> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To:
coi@gnb.ca> Cc:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
>
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th
https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug>
> January 11th, 2016
https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
>
https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
>
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
>
https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From:
justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To:
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>
lalanthier@hotmail.com>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>
lalanthier@hotmail.com>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"
MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca> To:
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> To:
kilgoursite@ca.inter.net,
MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>
nada.sarkis@gnb.ca,
wally.stiles@gnb.ca,
dwatch@web.net,
>
motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> CC:
ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
riding@chuckstrahl.com,
John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>
Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"
bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"
PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
>
e-mail:coi@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <
JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "
motomaniac333@gmail.com"<
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
On 8/3/17, David Amos <
motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
>
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz> ilian.html
>
>>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>>
http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200>> 6
>>
>>
http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html>>
>>
http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139>>
>>
http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email:
bbachrach@bowditch.com>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.htmlSunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.doFederal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<
Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:04:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a
snap-election was flawed bigtime N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:04:18 -0300
Subject: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a snap-election was flawed
bigtime N'esy Pas?
To:
oldmaison@yahoo.com,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
chris@duffie.ca,
ron.tremblay2@gmail.com,
aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca,
jake.stewart@gnb.ca,
andre@jafaust.com,
rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
<
David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
<
megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<
kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "dan.
bussieres"<
dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
<
serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"<
greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"Jack.Keir"<
Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
<
tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<
jeff.carr@gnb.ca>,
bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com,
jjatwin@gmail.com, markandcaroline
<
markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
sheppardmargo@gmail.com,
jordan.gill@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy"<
steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"
<
David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Newsroom <
Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Furey, John"<
jfurey@nbpower.com>,
"David.Lametti"<
David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <
mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin"<
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
<
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <
premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<
premier@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <
motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
<
blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<
robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore"<
Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Fowler"
<
Shane.Fowler@cbc.ca>, pm <
pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<
PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, "Katie.Telford"
<
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, postur <
postur@for.is>, postur
<
postur@fjr.stjr.is>
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_repliesDavid Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks I should not have been surprised to see the VERY CORRUPT CBC
block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter and in the very
domain we all pay for with our tax dollars N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/higgss-rationale-for-no-snap-election.html #nbpoli #cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/provincial-election-covid-19-1.5691769 CBC's Facebook Live answers questions about provincial election
Do you have questions about the election on Sept. 14? We have answers
CBC News · Posted: Aug 19, 2020 10:44 AM AT
46 Comments
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks they will block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter N'esy Pas?
BINGO
Your account has been banned until September 3, 2020. Reason: We have
banned this account for 15 days because we believe it is in violation
of our Terms of Use. For more information, please visit:
http://cbc.ca/submissions.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-premier-blaine-higgs-no-election-agreement-flawed-1.5685109Higgs's rationale for no-snap-election deal is flawed, says political expert
Three byelections must be held this fall
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 13, 2020 2:50 PM AT
99 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Methinks "political experts" make some of the best clowns in Higgy's
circus but the Green Meanies take the cake N'esy Pas?
David Amos
A false dilemma??? Too Too Funny
"One thing that is very important to realize is that there's not two
options here," Green MLA Kevin Arseneau said on his way in to the
meeting. "It's not an election or a deal. That's like a false dilemma
that's been invented."
Lou Bell
Reply to @David Amos: Dilemma alright ! Does Arsenault reveal he's an
back door SANB Liberal or continue running as an uncommitted Green ?
We know what Gauvins true colours always were ! Same as Arsenault !
David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you must have enough clues between your
ears to understand that a dilemma is a dilemma for the former SANB
boss and that is no such thing as a false one N'esy Pas?
Jos Allaire
Reply to @Lou Bell: I see that you are obsessed with the SANB, grosse bee got!
Jos Allaire
Reply to @David Amos: I think you are giving Lou Dumbell too much credit.
David Amos
Reply to @Jos Allaire: Welcome back to the circus Maggie
Lou Bell
Reply to @David Amos: Ah yes , the reincarnation of poor Maggie ! And
we also know who Marc is now . With an Anglophone name to boot !
Jason Inness
I think Higgs has done a pretty good job. However, this is a
disturbing trend that he is always looking for more power. He doesn't
seem to consult his caucus on important decisions (i.e. the ER
Closures), he wanted more power legislated into the EM Act (and backed
down when he couldn't get the votes to pass it), and now he wants the
opposition to declare two years of support for his government. If this
is how he acts with a minority, can he really be trusted with a
majority government?
Jos Allaire
Reply to @Jason Inness: I agree with you on everything except the
first sentence.
David Amos
Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks Maggie by any other name is like moth
to flame N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Reply to @Jason Inness: Can the SANB Liberals be trusted any at all ?
See their UNDISCLOSED 130 million dollar giveaway of taxpayers money
!!! Obviously they can't !!!!!!!!
Al Borland
If Higgs were to send Cardy packing back to the N D P , Greens, or
Liberals where he belongs then he'd gain my vote. Otherwise, let's
hope the P A N B do well.
David Amos
Reply to @Al Borland: Now thats funny. Methinks you PANB people should
Google Cardy Higgs and butter tarts ASAP N'esy Pas?
Peter Baxter
Inconceivable.....
Very much against tradition....
Like Brian Gallant refusing to step aside when he did not have the most seats!
So ... we know......inconceivable and very much against tradition
...are trade marks of the Liberals !
"It would be very much against how custom and convention typically
operate in Canada" ,...yep...that describes what Brian did....only two
years ago...in a nutshell
David Amos
Reply to @Peter Baxter: You understand that it is just a circus?
Fred Brewer
I smell desperation coming from the PC camp.
David Amos
Reply to @Fred Brewer: Me Too
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/robert-gauvin-election-former-deputy-premier-1.5690535Former PC cabinet minister runs for Liberals in Shediac Bay-Dieppe
Robert Gauvin was deputy premier and minister of tourism in Blaine
Higgs's cabinet until quitting
Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 18, 2020 11:47 AM AT
233 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks Higgy et al are well aware that I am overjoyed by the fact
that Mr Gauvin donned a red coat and opted to remain in the circus
N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise
Josef Blow
Reply to @David Amos: Just when you thought you were having a good
day, along comes the Beard.
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks you are just jealous that you can't
grow one worth talking about N'esy Pas?
Jim Cyr
He's an opportunistic disgrace to all Acadians.
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks many Acadians appreciate his skills as a
comedian so they should keep the clown in the circus N'esy Pas?
David Stairs
these guys will do anything to guarantee the golden pension....say one
thing to get votes and then follow whatever party line there is...it's
disgusting...
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Stairs: Methinks it par for the course that all
politicians and public employees play N'esy Pas?
Johnny Almar
This is enough reason to ditch the Liberal party.
Vickers will probably lose in Miramichi because the PA has a well
liked and respected MLA there already.
Insiders have balked at Vickers’ poor social skills and overall snobiness.
Al Borland
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Let's hope the People's Alliance replace the
Liberals as the official opposition. I see good things in the future
for New Brunswick. A level of unity and pride that we haven't had for
a long time.
Janice small
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Thie is nothing exciting about Vickers, poor
people skills,, no experience in gouvernment reminds of my grandfather
when he talks, little no no charisma and really knows nothing about
being Premier.. Just like Gallant,, but that's what the party wants a
soft gumby who they can twist and bend and make him tow the party
line.. God forsaken if they had somebody with a voice and an opinion..
David Amos
Reply to @Johnny Almar: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
things never cease N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @Al Borland: Dream on
Luke Armstrong
Shediac Bay - Dieppe...do you they ever elect anyone but Liberals?
val harris
Reply to @Luke Armstrong: No and it shows they know what they are
doin. Well done Shediac
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Luke Armstrong: French name, the vote is yours. Doesn't
matter what kind of human garbage it is
Josef Blow
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Pretty nasty language there, Mr. Oliver ! I'm
surprised CBC would, in this very situation, allow "human garage" such
as that to which you so gingerly refer, to publish such offensive
gibberish.
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: Did I hurt your feelings? Awww
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: Whats a human garage? I'm confused. If you're
gonna go all moral police on someone get the nasty bits right at
least, precious Mr blow
Greg Windsor
Reply to @val harris: well that is certainly where the money is being
pumped into....
Josef Blow
Reply to @Ray Oliver: A gallant effort Ray, but you'"ll need to eat a
few more Wheaties to get up to speed. I'll sip my Red Rose waiting for
your arrival … ah, I'll make a pot. Lots of time … And, my feelings
are damaged … but I'll make it. Ne pas worry.
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Josef Blow: A "Gallant" effort. Perfect candidate for
Shediac. Maybe prop one up like weekend at Bernies, he/she would win
every time. Be about as useful too
Jeff Leblanc
Reply to @Ray Oliver: just mute this new guy who seems to be a
condescending jerk. Thats what I'm doing. Then him and David Amos and
Marc Martin can all play together in the sandbox with nobody' to
bother them
David Amos
Reply to @Josef Blow: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
things never cease N'esy Pas?
Brian Robertson
It's always been us and them.
The French always vote Liberal, so we either concede to them of vote
Conservative.
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Brian Robertson: or...and here me out, you could vote
purple. Then one day, not this election cycle or even next, but one
day they might get enough seats to be a viable alternative. We will
never know unless we give it a shot.
Dan Lee
Reply to @Brian Robertson:
What is it with you quys ..the french this ....the french that.......
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Dan Lee: well I mean come on. In NB the French are quite
vocal and tend to be catered to by the main 2 parties who need the
votes. And that rubs the great silent majority the wrong way. Used to
bother me too but I've come to accept it will never change. Your food
will taste better and the air will be fresher when you realize that
sad fact.
Dan Lee
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: bahahahaha.......yea...... bahahaha...........
Josef Blow
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: So, you appear to equate "Purple" (such a
noble colour for such a petty party) with "Green", (as in the
expression, "The grass is always greener on the other side".
Someone once told me that the reason why the grass is likely "greener
on the other side", is because that is where the septic tank is … . I
think the idea fits the bill here.
Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @Josef Blow: the only way the grass would be greener near the
septic tank would be it it was leaking
Natalie Pugh
Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: We need to, now more than ever, force the
change! Our children and grandchildren have been placed second best
simply for not being able to speak a language that is fading away.
After all what are the true stats of those who are unilingual french
in NB....3%?? It's not about culture and never was. It's control over
the job market and nothing else.
David Amos
Reply to @Brian Robertson: Methinks you should explain to folks real
slow why lots of French folks voted for Mr Gauvin in the last election
or all the other Conservatives they have elected in the past
particularly under the mandates of Hatfield, Lord and even Alward
N'esy Pas?
Brian Robertson
Reply to @David Amos:
I think you should explain this bizarre idiom you have adopted as some
kind a signature preamble and postscript to all your comments.
But, in the fullness of time and the plethora of my posts, you will
find the answers to your query.
It would be redundant of me to repeat it merely at your request.
Eric Plexe
Robert Gauvin would not be the only political opportunist to change
parties as Dominic Cardy was formerly the leader of the NB NDP.
Mack Leigh
Reply to @Eric Plexe:
It is not about political conviction, ethics or strength of character
but all about what Gauvin can benefit from this move..
Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Mack Leigh:
Much the same as Mr Cardy then..............
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks Minister Cardy won't miss having to
share his butter tarts with the former Deputy Premier as his former
conservative cohort Mr Duffie challenges him for his seat N'esy Pas?
Lou Bell
Now all we need is for Arsenault to admit his also being another SANB Liberal .
David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you forgot that when the liberals didn't
want him to run for them last time he snubbed Higgy et al and ran for
the Green Meanies instead N'esy Pas?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:46 -0300
Subject: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything a
cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas?
To:
Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
irwinlampert@gmail.com,
glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
<
Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"Barbara.Whitenect"<
Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
<
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey"<
barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
<
Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<
sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <
mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee"<
Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
"steve.murphy"<
steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
Jacques.Poitras@cbc.caCc:
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Premier@ontario.ca,
Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, motomaniac333
<
motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Alexander.Quon@globalnews.ca---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<
Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca---------- Original message ----------
From: "Axiotis-Perez, Alex"<
Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:14:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Hello,
Please note that I am currently away from the office.
For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Brooke
Malinoski (
Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca)
Thank you!
*****
Bonjour,
Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
Pour toute question urgente pendent mon absence, veuillez contacter
Brooke Malinoski (
Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca)
Merci !
---------- Original message ----------
From:
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.caDate: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
Cleveland Allaby?
To:
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.comThank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.
Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit:
https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/enMoreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.
Best,
MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.
En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:
https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/frEn outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.
Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site :
http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirusMerci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
Cordialement,
Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:14:56 -0300
Subject: Re: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything
a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas Cleveland Allaby?
To:
Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca,
rick.lafrance@pcnb.org,
bobhatheway@gmail.com,
cleveland.allaby@me.com,
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
David.Coon@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca,
blaine.higgs@pcnb.org,
claude.williams@pcnb.org,
duncan@dlmca.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Furey, John"<
jfurey@nbpower.com>,
francineqs@gmail.com,
stephan.richard1@gmail.com,
awlebrun@hotmail.com,
charlesdoucet850@gmail.com, "David.Lametti"
<
David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<
Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
<
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
<
Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Bill.Morneau@parl.gc.ca,
Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca,
Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
John.Williamson@parl.gc.caCc:
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, mcu <
mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
ssducks@xplornet.ca,
shawn_morrison_1974@icloud.com,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
premier.ministre@gnb.ca,
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Premier@ontario.ca,
newsroom@globeandmail.com---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<
Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 16:41:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyers Joël Etienne and
Christian Michaud, the RCMP, the CBC and Higgy et al must be well
aware of my emails and the blog I created on July 8th and updated
today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.
If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.
Thank you.
Bonjour,
Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
Merci.
Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <
mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:11:27 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To:
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com** Message blocked **
Your message to
blaine.higgs@pcnb.org has been blocked. See technical
details below for more information.
The response from the remote server was:
550 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. AS(201806281)
[
TO1CAN01FT012.eop-CAN01.prod.protection.outlook.com]
On 8/12/20, David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<
Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:28:26 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
> Cleveland Allaby?
> To: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
> understanding.
>
> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
> visit
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>
> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
> veuillez visiter
>
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
> Merci.
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick
> E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
On 8/7/20, David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Whereas the RCMP, thier lawyers and their political bosses don't like
> to read things perhaps they may enjoy reviewing some videos I made
> after the Feds falsely arrested me and assaulted me the DECH in Fat
> Fred City 2008
>
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjonbmIti-o>
> The RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
> 326 views
> Oct 15, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IXzuc4QFLY>
> RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
> 73 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nq9WozWEyAI>
> Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
> 372 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9tFll72Wcs>
> A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this CD
> 44 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From:
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To:
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit:
https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
>
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
>
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:
https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site :
http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
>
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Telford, Katie"<
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>
> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
> Axiotis-Perez
> (
Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:
Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>
> ***
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>
> Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
> Alex Axiotis-Perez
> (
Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:
Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <
Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <
newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to
customerservice@globeandmail.com>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
mailto:
publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to
letters@globeandmail.com>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From:
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in
> CBC
> To:
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit:
https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
>
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<
http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
>
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:
https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site :
http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
>
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <
david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:08 -0300
> Subject: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
> To:
irwinlampert@gmail.com,
glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
> <
Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
>
Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect"<
Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <
carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey"<
barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
> <
Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <
sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <
mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Friday.Joe"<
Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <
motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
> <
Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<
steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
>
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-management-reviews-police-investigations-1.5670446>
>
> Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
>
> Management reviews give previously hidden look at quality of RCMP
> investigations
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>
> "Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said he would be surprised if some of the issues found in the
> older reports continued to this day.
>
> "I saw very very few examples of police officers who would obviously
> violate an accused's rights under the charter," Lampert said of his
> time on the bench, referring to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>
> "Some were through inadvertence rather than malfeasance. In some cases
> they just didn't realize that they were doing something wrong and it
> would be pointed out to them and you would hope that it wouldn't
> happen again."
>
> New Brunswick is among three provinces where Crown prosecutors must
> approve charges before they are laid in court.
> Court issues
>
> A 2017 review of the Hampton detachment is generally favourable, but
> describes prosecutions abandoned or dropped.
>
> In three of 45 cases brought to the Crown by police, the evidence
> didn't support the charges. Issues with arrests in two of the 45 cases
> led to the Crown not prosecuting. The report pointed to a lack of
> supervision as a contributing factor.
>
> "When supervision is not taking place, solvable, prosecutable cases
> could result in acquittals or charges forwarded when not warranted,
> bringing liability to the organization and members," the report says."
>
>
>
>
> 30 Comments
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Henry
> I cannot think of a worse job than being a police officer. Working
> nights, deaths, domestic violence, distrust in law enforcement, and
> while trying to do your job the best you can, the very real
> possibility you make a split second mistake, and you yourself end up
> in jail the rest of your life!
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Paperwork, and the lack of the proper paperwork,
> could hardly be lumped in with split second mistaken decisions.
>
> Dan Moore
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Yes, policing is a difficult job, if it is your
> worst job don't become a police officer. We should demand only the
> best suited become police officers and you clearly don't fit the bill.
> Also be aware that in that 'split second' mistake that could end you
> up in jail could also take the life of an innocent person as we have
> seen happen in the US time and again though less so in Canada, it
> still occurs. Being a police officer should not put you above the law
> rather place you under greater scrutiny as it is their job to enforce
> it. All aspects of it including presumed innocence and other
> constitutional rights.
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The RCMP are still playing dumb about falsely
> arresting me even after I sued the Crown and are inviting me to do so
> again Go Figure
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said..... "Some were through inadvertence rather than
> malfeasance. In some cases they just didn't realize that they were
> doing something wrong and it would be pointed out to them and you
> would hope that it wouldn't happen again."
> That pretty much sums the problem up right there where police are not
> held accountable for their actions , and the people in the position of
> over seeing the Justice System let it slide , and hope that the police
> will do better . That combined with the militarization of the police
> is rapidly eroding the public's trust in the police and Justice System
> . You need to look no further than what is currently happening in the
> U.S. to see where things are eventually heading .When the only tool
> that the police have is a hammer , then every problem starts to look
> like a nail .
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Matt Steele:
> Imo, you picked out the most important sentence in that article, but I
> have a completely different take on it.
>
> To me it shows there are checks and balances in place, in the system,
> that are working.
>
> However, I feel that the law & order bureaucracy in Canada is too
> insulated and lacks real transparency and accountability. Elections
> and short term limits for Judges, Crown Prosecutors and police chiefs
> would help solve the problem.
>
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you Irwin Lampert should check my work
> N;esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
>
https://nbweddings.ca/about-me/>
>
> :"For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges."
>
> J. Gilles Lemieux
> Called to the bar: 1990 (NB)
> Lemieux Ménard & Co
> Lawyer
> 4405 Route 115
> Saint-Antoine Sud, New Brunswick E4V 2Z5
> Phone: 506-525-9717
> Fax: 506-525-9509
> Email:
glemieux@lemcolaw.ca>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <
kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <
motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at
David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@
parl.gc.ca> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon à l'adresse suivante
>
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Pour toute question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David à l'adresse
> suivante
David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@
parl.gc.ca>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
>
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
Ahead of Wednesday's speech from the throne NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said his party would need to see the Canada emergency response benefit (CERB) extended and paid sick leave offered to every employee across the country to ensure no Canadian has to go to work sick. (The Canadian Press)
The Pentagon’s ever-expanding military budget ruins creativity and pollutes good leadership, argues retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson — a fierce critic of the 'military-industrial complex.' (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
The new school will be built on land next to Bernice McNaughton High School and will eventually replace the smaller and aging Hillcrest and Bessborough schools. (Google Maps)
