https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Whatever Trade War Trump pursues with whomever is not gonna affect Kim Jong-un and North Korea in a negative fashion. In fact it may assist him in finally getting to trade with the rest of the so called "Free World" N'esy Pas?
#cdnpoli#TradeWar #NAFTA
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pompeo-north-korea-kim-jong-un-1.4737897
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Scott Wilson "It is hard to find non-moderated words for what he is doing" My reply
My reply
Methinks that is the story of my life within the comment section of CBC's domain N'esy Pas?
#cdnpoli#nbpoli#TradeWar #NAFTA
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/trump-china-trade-war-1.4735828
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Methinks in lieu of merely clicking "dislike" about my choice of words folks should Google the following and finally begin to check my work N'esy Pas?
Trump Cohen Morneau Amos NAFTA FATCA TPP
#cdnpoli#nbpoli#TradeWar#Trump #Trudeau#NAFTA
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/07/why-trumps-trade-war-makes-sense.html
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Methinks Canadian folks should get over the fact that Trump was elected and start studying what he is doing as the Yankee President that affects us and the rest of the world N'esy Pas?
#cdnpoli#nbpoli#TradeWar#Trump#TrudeauSplaining#Trudeau#NAFTA
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/trump-china-trade-war-1.4735828
Neil Austen
David Amos
Brian Bailey
Charles Hobart
Dale Sullivan
Katy Rose
Ivan Nano
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pompeo-north-korea-kim-jong-un-1.4737897
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Whatever Trade War Trump pursues with whomever is not gonna affect Kim Jong-un and North Korea in a negative fashion. In fact it may assist him in finally getting to trade with the rest of the so called "Free World" N'esy Pas?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pompeo-north-korea-kim-jong-un-1.4737897
North Korea says Pompeo made 'gangster-like' demands but he calls talks 'productive'
U.S. Secretary of State says Pyongyang officials commit to new discussions on denuclearization
The Associated Press· Posted: Jul 07, 2018 7:36 AM ET Comments
Steven Read
Trump just can't stop making things up and his base can't stop believing him. This is bizarre
David Amos
@Steven Read Methinks folks blessed with common sense would not believe any of them but one thing is for certain whatever Trade War Trump pursues with whomever is not gonna affect Kim Jong-un and North Korea in a negative fashion. In fact it may assist him in finally getting to trade with the rest of the so called "Free World" N'esy Pas?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/trump-china-trade-war-1.4735828
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/trump-china-trade-war-1.4735828
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Scott Wilson "It is hard to find non-moderated words for what he is doing" My reply
My reply
Methinks that is the story of my life within the comment section of CBC's domain N'esy Pas?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/trump-china-trade-war-1.4735828
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Methinks in lieu of merely clicking "dislike" about my choice of words folks should Google the following and finally begin to check my work N'esy Pas?
Trump Cohen Morneau Amos NAFTA FATCA TPP
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/07/why-trumps-trade-war-makes-sense.html
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Methinks Canadian folks should get over the fact that Trump was elected and start studying what he is doing as the Yankee President that affects us and the rest of the world N'esy Pas?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/trump-china-trade-war-1.4735828
Why Trump's trade war makes sense — if you're Trump
If the U.S. escalates its trade war, the rest of the world, starting with Canada, will be collateral damage
Comments
Scott Wilson
Trump is playing one-dimensional checkers, here, and apparently doesn't even think the other side gets a turn! It is hard to find non-moderated words for what he is doing.
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Scott Wilson "It is hard to find non-moderated words for what he is doing"
Methinks that is the story of my life within the comment section of CBC's domain N'esy Pas?
Methinks that is the story of my life within the comment section of CBC's domain N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@David Amos Surprise Surprise Methinks the Honourable Forest Gump was correct "Stupid Is As Stupid Does" N'esy Pas?
John Oaktree
@David Amos
Yup he would Messy Paws...
Yup he would Messy Paws...
Neil Austen
Do people know many times Trump has gone bankrupt in his personal business. This alone should have barred him running for office. Are people really so clueless?
David Amos
@Neil Austen Methinks Canadian folks should get over the fact that Trump was elected and start studying what he is doing as the Yankee President that affects us and the rest of the world N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Neil Austen Methinks Canadian folks should get over the fact that Trump was elected and start studying what he is doing as the Yankee President that affects us and the rest of the world N'esy Pas?
Content disabled.
@Neil Austen Methinks folks should be made aware that the second most "liked" comment thread which was yours as well just went "POOF" N'esy Pas?
"POOF"
Neil Austen
Neil Austen
Being polite about Trump is anti productive. Let's just call him for what he is - disgusting and dangerous. If you keep talking about Trump and reporting his atrocities as it were something normal, uneducated people are not going to understand the repugnant nature of what Trump is and what he is doing.
Jason Tremblay (JasonDiggy)
@Neil Austen
Trump is bringing on the economic and democratic demise of Western countries.
Well played, Putin. Well played.
Trump is bringing on the economic and democratic demise of Western countries.
Well played, Putin. Well played.
David Amos
@Jason Tremblay (JasonDiggy) "Similarly, a president who sees China as a menace lurking around every corner wouldn't want the U.S. to rely on any foreign country for its economic or military needs. "
Methinks CBC is starting to understand what I have talking about N'esy Pas?
Methinks CBC is starting to understand what I have talking about N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Jason Tremblay (JasonDiggy) Methinks in lieu of merely clicking "dislike" about my choice of words folks should Google the following and finally begin to check my work N'esy Pas?
Trump Cohen Morneau Amos NAFTA FATCA TPP
Trump Cohen Morneau Amos NAFTA FATCA TPP
"POOF"
Jack Black
Jack Black
@Neil Austen
Some of his business may have gone bankrupt in the past but i think hes doing ok. Hes worth over 3.5 billion.
He also donates his salary every paycheck. Trumps Presidential salary has gone to Veterans, opiod abuse, transportation min ect. Likely wont read about the good things Trump has done if you only read CBC or CNN.
Some of his business may have gone bankrupt in the past but i think hes doing ok. Hes worth over 3.5 billion.
He also donates his salary every paycheck. Trumps Presidential salary has gone to Veterans, opiod abuse, transportation min ect. Likely wont read about the good things Trump has done if you only read CBC or CNN.
David Amos
@Jack Black Methinks folks blessed with common sense would not believe any of them but one thing is for certain whatever Trade War Trump pursues with whomever is not gonna affect Kim Jong-un and North Korea in a negative fashion. In fact it may assist him in finally getting to trade with the rest of the so called "Free World" N'esy Pas?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pompeo-north-korea-kim-jong-un-1.4737897
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pompeo-north-korea-kim-jong-un-1.4737897
Brian Bailey
Navarro is ludicrous. I live in China and I see American products everywhere. People look up to the US and want to send their kids there to study. Trump is nuts. How could the "former" leader of the free world elect such a stupid President who will cause SO MUCH DAMAGE to many, many countries, in addition to the US itself? ! The world will bypass the US as much as it can in order to save itself from as much damage as possible, but seriously, Americans are stupid to have elected this crazy man.
Content disabled.
David Amos
David Amos
@Brian Bailey I do agree with you however methinks I should point out that the only other choice Yankee folks were offered to elect as the leader of the free world was Hillary N'esy Pas?
Charles Hobart
It is in Canada’s, China’s and the EU’s strong collective interests to forge a new economic relationship that is independent of Washington. Canada must fight against the Trumpian worldview wherein ‘might makes right’ and rules are for only the weak.
David Amos
@Charles Hobart YUP
David Amos
@Josephine Marcus "Haven't seen that MeToo guy Justin in a while, is he taking another vacation in British Columbia this time?"
Nope Methinks Trudeau the Younger has changed costumes again and according to CBC he is having a pretty good time in Harper's old stomping grounds even after his old history in BC was considered N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/trudeau-visits-hehrs-pancake-breakfast-calgary-stampede-1.4738157
Nope Methinks Trudeau the Younger has changed costumes again and according to CBC he is having a pretty good time in Harper's old stomping grounds even after his old history in BC was considered N'esy Pas?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/trudeau-visits-hehrs-pancake-breakfast-calgary-stampede-1.4738157
David Amos
@Andreas Burnett "Trump is a "bad guy" because he isn't doing what the creditors want. "
Methinks you don't know "The Donald" I know N'esy Pas?
Methinks you don't know "The Donald" I know N'esy Pas?
Dale Sullivan
Navarro and Ross are trying out an economic experiment. They don't care if it fails. And it will. Trump doesn't care either. They are willing to gamble. The everyday American is the one who will suffer.
David Amos
@Dale Sullivan I concur
Bryan Atkinson
Like any war, there are always casualties on both sides. Including a trade war. As US casualties mount, Trump will undoubtedly be hurt at the ballot box.
It's unfortunate, it's unnecessary and it's unprovoked. But this time Trump, himself, will be hurt by his miscalculated belligerence.
It's unfortunate, it's unnecessary and it's unprovoked. But this time Trump, himself, will be hurt by his miscalculated belligerence.
David Amos
@Bryan Atkinson Methinks we will know the true score on what the Yankees think of this malicious nonsense in November. In the "mean" time we should all hope Trump does not inspire a stock market crash or we all will suffer N'esy Pas?
Bryan Atkinson
@Artie Gibson
Like Trump, you're unclear on the concept of what trade is meant to accomplish. It's a zero sum game.
The negative balance of exports to imports is made up by the price benefit to American consumers from buying imported products. And since the US is basically at full employment, importing more than they export is not hurting their job market.
If Trump goes ahead with his tariffs on cars it's expected to add about $2000. to the price of a vehicle. You don't think that will hurt American consumers?
Like Trump, you're unclear on the concept of what trade is meant to accomplish. It's a zero sum game.
The negative balance of exports to imports is made up by the price benefit to American consumers from buying imported products. And since the US is basically at full employment, importing more than they export is not hurting their job market.
If Trump goes ahead with his tariffs on cars it's expected to add about $2000. to the price of a vehicle. You don't think that will hurt American consumers?
David Amos
@Bryan Atkinson Methinks you look at trade and tariffs far different that I as is yur right. It could be because I do not agree with the liberals or conservatives or free trade and NAFTA in particular. However it appears that Trump is using trade as some sort of weapon to the chagrin of most folks worldwide including the US citizens he purportedly serves and protects N'esy Pas?
Jackson Thomson
Donald Trump, next bankruptcy, America.
Little room to maneuver given deficits (1 trillion 2018) with a booming economy.
Little room to maneuver given low rate by the Fed.
Little room to maneuver given deficits (1 trillion 2018) with a booming economy.
Little room to maneuver given low rate by the Fed.
Andy Benoit
@Jackson Thomson and don’t forget about who will go down with them !
CANADA THAT IS ,!
CANADA THAT IS ,!
David Amos
@Andy Benoit YUP
Maya Tikal
If it makes sense to Trump then it's obviously a bad idea. Worst. President. Ever.
David Amos
@Maya Tikal Methinks you should inform Trump's many fans ASAP because even CNN has admitted that some polls claim he is even more popular N'esy Pas?
Katy Rose
Shame on the conservatives that are cheering for this country to fail.
Dan Cooper
@James Fitzgibbon
Indeed! Incels and young conservatives are one in the same. Bitter and angry at society for their yuge loss in the genetic lottery.
Pierre Poilievre is their poster boy and a 'star' conservative LOL
They actually believe that if society regresses, it will push them to the top...
Sad
Indeed! Incels and young conservatives are one in the same. Bitter and angry at society for their yuge loss in the genetic lottery.
Pierre Poilievre is their poster boy and a 'star' conservative LOL
They actually believe that if society regresses, it will push them to the top...
Sad
David Amos
@Dan Cooper Methinks folks blessed with common sense would not believe Pierre Poilievre or any of them but one thing is for certain whatever Trade War Trump pursues with whomever is not gonna affect Kim Jong-un and North Korea in a negative fashion. In fact it may assist him in finally getting to trade with the rest of the so called "Free World" N'esy Pas?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pompeo-north-korea-kim-jong-un-1.4737897
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pompeo-north-korea-kim-jong-un-1.4737897
Ivan Nano
It will only be when the pocket books of ordinary people get hit, will Trump's popularity with Republicans start to diminish. (with everyone else there no chance he will gain popularity)
Based on how quickly things are ramping up, that should start happening very soon.
With crops in the fields that have no markets, with gas prices rising, when your next car is $$$$ more than it was last year, when WalMart starts raising all their prices, ... the list goes on.
As for this 'war' with China, the Americans still fail to realize they've already lost.
Based on how quickly things are ramping up, that should start happening very soon.
With crops in the fields that have no markets, with gas prices rising, when your next car is $$$$ more than it was last year, when WalMart starts raising all their prices, ... the list goes on.
As for this 'war' with China, the Americans still fail to realize they've already lost.
Brian Cohen
@Victor Cretu
China can out last them easily
China can out last them easily
David Amos
@Brian Cohen YUP Methinks everybody knows that Trump's bluff is being called bigtime even by Trudeau "The Younger". Furthermore everybody knows the Golden Rule is "He with The Gold Makes The Rules" Nobody should deny that the Chinese and the Russians have been buying gold by the ton for years with the Yankee's petrodollars and Canada can produce its own gold N'esy Pas?
Erin Wilson
Poor Don Trump. He failed at business. He failed at being a billionaire. Now he's failing as a president & ruining America.
Don Trump has made a mockery of America.
Don Trump has made a mockery of America.
David Amos
@Erin Wilson Welcome to the circus
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 18:55:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Chuck Thompson I just called you back
Why is it that CBC won't say anything about me or to me since 2004
even though you people obviously knew I existed on the ballots?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 14:55:24 -0400
Subject: Attn Chuck Thompson I just called you back Why is it that CBC
won't say anything about me or to me since 2004 even though you people
obviously knew I existed on the ballots?
To: "Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada. ca>, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "hance.colburne"
<hance.colburne@cbc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> , "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"
<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
"brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
LeslieBory@canadianschoice.com , Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>, paul
<paul@paulfromm.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> , "Melanie.Joly"
<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. ca>, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>
You received a new 10:00 minutes voicemail message, on Tuesday, July
03, 2018 at 08:01:10 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from 4165093315.
You received a new 4:59 minutes voicemail message, on Tuesday, July
03, 2018 at 08:06:53 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from 4165093315.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/ canada/new-brunswick/fundy- royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
Fundy Royal campaign targets middle class with focus on jobs
Fundy Royal voters have elected Conservatives all but 1 time in 28
elections over 101 years
CBC News · Posted: Oct 17, 2015 6:00 AM AT
56 Comments
David Amos
It appears that the CROWN Corp known as CBC has failed its MANDATE
once again and acted in a very partisan fashion in ignoring my name on
the ballot. Correct? The real question is will the CROWN even allow
this comment to be posted?
David Amos
@David Amos FYI
http://www.cbc.ca/news/ politics/factscan-plans-to- test-political-claims-during- election-1.2951761
Tall tale-telling politicos, take heed: You could soon find your
claims put through the truth grinder by the folks at FactsCan, a newly
launched website that aims to provide an independent, non-partisan
fact-checking service during the upcoming federal election.
■FactsCan website
According to co-founder Dana Wagner, who also works as a researcher at
Ryerson University in Toronto, the team behind the site wants to help
voters "separate out the truth from spin, distortion, omission, error
and lies."
"Our goal is to enable Canadians to critically engage in
political-speak, and to encourage politicians to be honest and
accurate with their words," she told CBC News via email.
Unlike many countries, she noted, Canada does not have a major
fact-checking outlet — and FactsCan is hoping to change that before
the next election.« less
RURAL GUY
@David Amos was going to hold my nose and vote con until I seen your
name right at the top of the ballot. I instantly checked yours without
even looking any further. I've never seen such a poor choice for prime
minister for our three main parties, ever. when harper polls as good
as he is, kinda tells you something about the other two, yuk
David Amos
@David Amos FACTS
http://www.cbc.radio-canada. ca/en/reporting-to-canadians/ acts-and-policies/management/ human-resources/2-2-21/
STATEMENT
CBC/Radio-Canada is Canada's national public broadcaster and one of
its largest cultural institutions. In the fulfillment of this critical
role, this Code of Conduct outlines the values and expected behaviours
that guide CBC/Radio-Canada employees in all activities related to
their professional duties. By committing to these values and adhering
to the expected behaviours, CBC/Radio-Canada employees strengthen the
ethical culture of the public sector and contribute to public
confidence in the integrity of all public institutions.
1. Respect for Democracy
Subject to the Broadcasting Act, CBC/Radio-Canada employees shall
uphold the Canadian parliamentary democracy and its institutions by:
1.1 Respecting the rule of law and carrying out their duties in
accordance with legislation, policies and directives in a manner that
is and appears to be non-partisan and impartial.
1.2 Loyally carrying out the mandate of CBC/Radio-Canada as set out in
the Broadcasting Act, for which it is accountable to Parliament and
Canadians.
1.3 Providing decision makers of CBC/Radio-Canada with the
information, analysis and advice they need, always striving to be
open, candid and impartial.
2. Respect for People
CBC/Radio-Canada employees shall respect human dignity and the value
of every person by:
2.1 Treating every person with respect and fairness.« less
David Amos
@RURAL GUY Thank You for the vote of confidence Kind Sir
David Amos
Clearly there are FIVE candidates not merely four.
http://www.elections.ca/ Scripts/vis/candidates?L=e&ED= 13004&EV=41&QID=-1&PAGEID=17
and everybody knows it
https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=-cFOKT6TlSE
CT
@David Amos I'm sorry they ignored you,you have great points but you
should really pick a demographic that is smarter.Here people vote for
cons without ever using their brains.Sad really when all they
represent are Irving ,the potash corp and their minions.They are owned
by them and they don't even know it.
David Amos
Go figure
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ new-brunswick/pirate-party-s- james-wilson-aims-to-lead- party-nationally-1.2511054? cmp=rss
CBC writes lots about people who BS a lot then don't bother to put
their name on a ballot. Yet I have done so FIVE times and they have
never said a peep other than bar me from the airwaves and try to have
their pals in the other CROWN Corp known as the RCMP arrest me. Page
14 of this old pdf file of mine is the reason why.
http://www.checktheevidence. com/pdf/2526023- DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt. pdf
David Amos
I must Say I am rather impressed at CBC's sudden fit of Integrity to
allow my posts to stand the test of time for a few hours at least. (:
Rest assured that I have been saving digital snapshots just in case
they delete and block me as usual :)
In return here is an old scoop about CTV that CBC and everybody else
and his dog has been ignoring for 11 very long years after I ran in
the election of the 38th Parliament against the aptly named lawyer Rob
Moore.
http://thedavidamosrant. blogspot.ca/2013/08/re-bce- and-jean-pierre-blais-of-crtc. html
----- Original Message -----
From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: I am curious
Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is
no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the
documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the
process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it
in my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We
will then provide you with a reply.
Martine Turcotte
Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
Tel: (514) 870-4637
Fax: (514) 870-4877
email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
Tel: (514) 870-4638
email: diane.valade@bell.ca« less
David Amos
Anybody bother to notice I am the only person posting here with a real
name and it is the same name that is on the ballot in Fundy Royal?
Do ya think the lawyer Rob Moore "The True Conservative" or any of the
others would dare to debate me in writing with their true name within
a website funded by the taxpayer and controlled by questionable public
servants? How about outside the CROWN"s domain within the Yankee
website called Twitter? That is where I play very serious Political
Hard Ball. See for yourself or ask Rob Moore's hero Stevey Boy Harper
if I am a liar or not.
https://twitter.com/ DavidRayAmos/with_replies
tony forward
I may be a little confused here, Is there not 5 candidates in this
Riding.. Humm. Seems you forgot the Independent candidate, David Amos
is running, heard him on the radio and has a u tube following, Funny
how u tube has become become more accurate than the CBC. Shame on you,
CBC. Lets just see if you will post this comment,,,
David Amos
@tony forward For the record CBC is well aware that I am the fifth
candidate. Hance Colburne of CBC moderated the debate in Hampton on
Oct 7th one before CBC posted on their website on Oct 14th his
interview with Rob Moore on CBC airwaves
https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=DyNx6QEHqRA
David Amos
BTW Rob Moore and I know the truth about Randy Quaid's questionable
arrests in Canada and the USA. More importantly so does Randy I know
that for a fact.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/ randy-quaid-release-jail- vermont-1.3274216
"I never worried about being found guilty or any of that for any of
these charges because I know the truth, and I know the facts are going
to come out at some point, and today was a good sign of that," Randy
Quaid said
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ montreal/randy-quaid-court- appearance-1.3262238
"Quaid and his wife Evi, a Canadian citizen, have been living in
Montreal since February 2013."
"Robert Gervais, an official with the Immigration and Refugee Board,
confirmed in an email to CBC News that a detention review hearing for
Quaid is scheduled for Thursday afternoon.
But the reason for the actor's arrest is unclear.
Quaid, 64, was detained Tuesday morning after attending a regular
check-in with CBSA officials in downtown Montreal.
Quaid's lawyer, Mark Gruszczynski, declined to shed light on the
affair or to reveal the reason for Quaid's arrest."
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:07 -0500
> Subject: Calls and E-mails to CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Cc: Rob Renaud <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> CBC personnel have contacted me concerning your calls and e-mails to
> them. As you are threatening legal action, would you kindly direct any
> further calls or correspondence to me. Other CBC personnel will not
> respond further to your correspondence or calls.
>
>
> Edith Cody-Rice
> Senior Legal Counsel
> Premier Conseiller juridique
> CBC/Radio-Canada
> 181 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1K9
> Postal Address: P.O. Box 3220, Station C, Ottawa K1Y 1E4
> Tel: (613) 288-6164
> Cell: (613) 720-5185
> Fax/ Télécopieur (613) 288-6279
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE
> This communication is subject to solicitor/client privilege and
> contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to
> whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other
> distribution of this communication
> or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to
> anyone.
>
> AVIS IMPORTANT
> La présente communication est assujettie au privilège du secret
> professionnel de l'avocat et renferme des renseignements confidentiels
> intéressant uniquement leur destinataire. Il est interdit de
> divulguer, de copier ou de distribuer cette communication par quelque
> moyen que ce soit ou de donner suite à son contenu sans y être
> autorisé. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez nous en
> avertir immédiatement et le supprimer en évitant de le lire, de le
> copier ou de le transmettre à qui que ce soit.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:28 AM
> Subject: RE: I am curious
>
> Mr. Amos,
>
> I confirm that I have received your documentation.
>
> There is no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself,
> the documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in
> the process of printing it.
>
> I have asked one of my lawyers to review it in my absence and report
> back to me upon my return in the office. We will then provide you with
> a reply.
>
>
> Martine Turcotte
> Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
> BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
> 1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
> Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
>
> Tel: (514) 870-4637
> Fax: (514) 870-4877
> email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
>
> Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
>
> Tel: (514) 870-4638
>
> email: diane.valade@bell.ca
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@ hotmail.com
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 6:12 AM
> To: Turcotte, Martine (EX05453)
> Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca; W-Five@ctv.ca
> Subject: I am curious
>
> Madam
>
> I did not receive a response from you to the last email so I am not
> certain if you received it. I must inform you that I will be closing
> my briefcase in Yahoo for public view at the end of the week. I have a
> great deal of material to add and I only wish certain parties to view
> it. I opened it for you the other day as an act of good faith. Mr.
> Pozen can check my work in the dockets of the various courts around
> Boston they are a matter of Public Record my files are not. As you can
> see by this and some following emails. I am very busy dealing with
> criminal matters first before filing civil complaints in the USA. As I
> told you when you called a lot has been happening. I have made a lot
> of cops mad at me and I don't trust them a bit particularly after the
> Police Commission is willing to check their work so i have been busy
> watching my back and covering my butt. However that does not mean that
> I have not thought about our conversation and was curious about a few
> things.
>
> I was glad to receive your call and impressed by the fact that you
> were more than willing to receive the material and a copy of the
> wiretap tape in particular. Your stated willingness to uphold the law
> was a rare statement to me. However I was curious why you only
> mentioned my voicemail to Mr. Pozen and not the email to your company
> and the news program that it owns. Did they not inform you as well? If
> they didn't I am not surprised because I have some other rather
> interesting denials from the Media. the most interesting would have to
> be from the PBS program called Frontline when I introduced its
> producer Michael Sullivan to the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan. Now
> that is a story well worth W5 telling. Too bad they showed me their
> ass. As a courtesy to you and a further act of good faith, I will not
> forward this email to anyone else until after I return to the USA and
> nothing has been resolved between BCE and I and I am compelled to name
> it in my complaint. I would find it very hard to believe that Mr,
> Pozen does not know everything he needs to know about me right now.
>
> I had also called a lawyer, Steven Skurka who had a week long little
> special on CTV . I had tried to inform him that I knew my rights his
> assistant hollered at me. You from speaking to me yourself that I am
> not a rude character. I found it too funny to be treated that way and
> I had resolved to serve him this stuff byway of the local ATV Station
> that had presented his smiling talking head to me. That is why I was
> telling you that you could get this stuff from the local ATV station.
> I found it quite strange that you did not rely on them to send it on
> to you. Thus I must make an extra copy to comply with your request.
>
> I know the date stamp on the forwarded email is incorrect but that is
> because my old laptop goes to the first year in it when I boot up and
> sometimes I am too busy or tired to bother changing it. However MSN
> tracks it with the true date. Brad Smith and I have a bone to pick as
> well and I have been checking his work rather closely since he ignored
> my letter to him last year. His boss Bill Gates is gonna be very angry
> and Brad Smith and Steve Balmer in the near future if I have anything
> to do with it. If you do act ethically and immediately I will settle
> with your company very cheaply in comparsion to the bottom lines of my
> first two complaints. In fact I will be so impressed I will
> immediatlely offer you a better job than the one you have now. Please
> study the material I will provide you closely and ask me any thing you
> wish.
>
> I will do as I promised and send the material you requested as soon as
> I can put it all together. Right now I am on the move and far away
> from my printer. Is the following your correct address? Perhaps you
> should consider sending someone to the my meeting with the Police
> Commission in Fredericton next week in order to hear me speak of these
> matters to law enforcement before I return to the USA. Once I do
> return there I will serve the Mr. Pozen the material as promised and
> call him to testify in my pending trial. The following emails should
> explain some of my concerns to you. My wife will be in Canada next
> week as well to pick up our kids. I will allow you to speak to her if
> you wish. She has had a nervous breakdown over the legal crap and I do
> have her Durable Power of Attorney pursuant to M.G.L. 201 B. Mr. Pozen
> can ask Robert S. Creedon Jr. about that document. I argued it with
> him before the entire Judicuary Commitee on Sept. 18th 2003.
>
> I will call you in a minute to make certain that you get this and the
> following emails.
>
> David R. Amos
>
> Martine Turcotte
>
> 1000 de la Gauchetiere Ouest
> Floor 41
> Montreal, Quebec H3B 58H Canada
> Tel: (514) 870-4637
> Fax: (514) 870-4877
>
> For the Record I gave the Irving "Rag called the Gleaner" in Fat Fred
> City and the CBC dudes in Toronto copies of the following lawsuits in
> the USA in 2002 long before I gave some material to Bellglobemedia
> byway of their W-Five yo yos. Clearly nobody knows how to read if they
> don't think I ain't sued folks before EH?
>
> Ask W-Five or their lawyers if I am a liar or not. Better yet ask
> Stevey Boy Murphy or Andy Campbell in Fat Fred City if they dare to
> chaleenge the truth. If all else fails and you bloggers seek counsel
> you can trust why not ask Chucky Leblanc or your "Blogger General"
> T.J. Burke he received the same documents on June 24th, 2004 the day
> Danny boy Busierres and the Fat Fred City Finest attempted to banish
> me from the LEG but it ain't worked out to well for them yet EH Chucky
> Leblanc? However chucky was quick to report that I was banished the
> following day and ain't said apeep about it since. Who to you think
> told him not to talk about it? Kelly lamrock, T.J. Burke. the Irvings
> or all three?
>
> FYI W-Five took an interest in my matters at about the same time
> Chretien's underling was calling Bush a moron.(I oftern call myself an
> oxymoron Methinks somebody has been studing my words EH?) I supported
> Chretein's underling's thinking in two affidavits demanding judgements
> by default filed in the following dockets on December 12th, 2002.
>
> The following day Cardinal Law (Methinks that is why chucky hates me
> so) quit Beantown and ran off to the Holy See. Years later he helped
> pick the latest Pope(a former Hitler Youth who is making his bones
> with the croooked little Georgey Boy Bush Jr. right now in the USA.)
>
> Never Forget the Queen is the protector of the Faith of the Church of
> England . She would not allow her family's assests to be stolen and
> given to the catholic Church. Why should I act any different?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: W-FIVE Viewer Mail
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:03 PM
> Subject: RE: possble story
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> I would like to thank you for your email to W-FIVE, sorry for the
> delay in responding.
>
> We review every email and story idea that we receive here at W-FIVE
> and give it serious consideration. Your email has been forwarded to
> our executive and senior producer for review. If we are interested in
> pursuing your idea further, you will be contacted by one of our
> researchers.
>
> Thanks again for your input. Your interest in our program is much
> appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Lisa-Marie
>
> Production Coordinator
>
> W-FIVE
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: a friend of David Amos' email account
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:28 PM
> To: W-FIVE@ctv.ca
> Subject: possble story
>
>
> I am a Canadian Citizen who thus far, as a plaintiff, has two Lawsuits
> in the US District Court of Massachucetts they are numbered 02-11686-
> RGS and 02-11687-RGS.
>
> They were removed to that Court from the Norfolk Superior Court by the
> US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan very improperly. However they shall
> remain there because of my status as a Canandian Citizen. Judge Sterns
> has not even held a Conference about the matters because he likely
> does not want to hear the matter because I have presented all Members
> of the Bar with their worst fear of a catch 22 problem.
>
> Accordinging to law he is late. I have complained of 47 defendants 34
> of whom are State Defendants( the Attorney General, The Commission of
> Judicial Conduct Board of Bar Overseers etc) and 3 are Federal
> Treasury Agents. Some of the defendants are over two months late in
> their answer to the Summons.
>
> The smallest suit amounts to 188 million dollars in the form of
> relief. There is a lot to these matters and too much to briefly
> explain. But in a nutshell my wife's Aunt, who is buried beside Rose
> Kennedy, left my wife some money. It was stolen by her relatives in
> executing the estate. No news there. But the crooks are very well
> connected politically and every part of the old crony network in
> Boston covered for them.
>
> The crook and our cousin, Charles J. Kickham Jr of the Kickham Law
> Office on Beacon St, has been past President of Bar Associations. He
> has sat on the Board of Governors of Harvard Law School etc. I have
> given much information to many members of the press who have simply
> ignored some interesting facts.
>
> What should be somewhat newsworthy is how far a wild colonial boy has
> come in prosecuting Pro Se the most profund Yankee carpetbaggers. My
> next two lawsuits Under title 18 are wickedly righteous. I have left
> one copy of much information in Saint John New Brunswick at a lawyer's
> Office, Mosher and Chedore 33 Charlotte St if some one wishes to view
> them. I can be reached at this Cell number 506 434- 1379
>
> David R. Amos
>
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 18:55:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Chuck Thompson I just called you back
Why is it that CBC won't say anything about me or to me since 2004
even though you people obviously knew I existed on the ballots?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 14:55:24 -0400
Subject: Attn Chuck Thompson I just called you back Why is it that CBC
won't say anything about me or to me since 2004 even though you people
obviously knew I existed on the ballots?
To: "Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "hance.colburne"
<hance.colburne@cbc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"
<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
"brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
LeslieBory@canadianschoice.com
<paul@paulfromm.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>
You received a new 10:00 minutes voicemail message, on Tuesday, July
03, 2018 at 08:01:10 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from 4165093315.
You received a new 4:59 minutes voicemail message, on Tuesday, July
03, 2018 at 08:06:53 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from 4165093315.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/
Fundy Royal campaign targets middle class with focus on jobs
Fundy Royal voters have elected Conservatives all but 1 time in 28
elections over 101 years
CBC News · Posted: Oct 17, 2015 6:00 AM AT
56 Comments
David Amos
It appears that the CROWN Corp known as CBC has failed its MANDATE
once again and acted in a very partisan fashion in ignoring my name on
the ballot. Correct? The real question is will the CROWN even allow
this comment to be posted?
David Amos
@David Amos FYI
http://www.cbc.ca/news/
Tall tale-telling politicos, take heed: You could soon find your
claims put through the truth grinder by the folks at FactsCan, a newly
launched website that aims to provide an independent, non-partisan
fact-checking service during the upcoming federal election.
■FactsCan website
According to co-founder Dana Wagner, who also works as a researcher at
Ryerson University in Toronto, the team behind the site wants to help
voters "separate out the truth from spin, distortion, omission, error
and lies."
"Our goal is to enable Canadians to critically engage in
political-speak, and to encourage politicians to be honest and
accurate with their words," she told CBC News via email.
Unlike many countries, she noted, Canada does not have a major
fact-checking outlet — and FactsCan is hoping to change that before
the next election.« less
RURAL GUY
@David Amos was going to hold my nose and vote con until I seen your
name right at the top of the ballot. I instantly checked yours without
even looking any further. I've never seen such a poor choice for prime
minister for our three main parties, ever. when harper polls as good
as he is, kinda tells you something about the other two, yuk
David Amos
@David Amos FACTS
http://www.cbc.radio-canada.
STATEMENT
CBC/Radio-Canada is Canada's national public broadcaster and one of
its largest cultural institutions. In the fulfillment of this critical
role, this Code of Conduct outlines the values and expected behaviours
that guide CBC/Radio-Canada employees in all activities related to
their professional duties. By committing to these values and adhering
to the expected behaviours, CBC/Radio-Canada employees strengthen the
ethical culture of the public sector and contribute to public
confidence in the integrity of all public institutions.
1. Respect for Democracy
Subject to the Broadcasting Act, CBC/Radio-Canada employees shall
uphold the Canadian parliamentary democracy and its institutions by:
1.1 Respecting the rule of law and carrying out their duties in
accordance with legislation, policies and directives in a manner that
is and appears to be non-partisan and impartial.
1.2 Loyally carrying out the mandate of CBC/Radio-Canada as set out in
the Broadcasting Act, for which it is accountable to Parliament and
Canadians.
1.3 Providing decision makers of CBC/Radio-Canada with the
information, analysis and advice they need, always striving to be
open, candid and impartial.
2. Respect for People
CBC/Radio-Canada employees shall respect human dignity and the value
of every person by:
2.1 Treating every person with respect and fairness.« less
David Amos
@RURAL GUY Thank You for the vote of confidence Kind Sir
David Amos
Clearly there are FIVE candidates not merely four.
http://www.elections.ca/
and everybody knows it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
CT
@David Amos I'm sorry they ignored you,you have great points but you
should really pick a demographic that is smarter.Here people vote for
cons without ever using their brains.Sad really when all they
represent are Irving ,the potash corp and their minions.They are owned
by them and they don't even know it.
David Amos
Go figure
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
CBC writes lots about people who BS a lot then don't bother to put
their name on a ballot. Yet I have done so FIVE times and they have
never said a peep other than bar me from the airwaves and try to have
their pals in the other CROWN Corp known as the RCMP arrest me. Page
14 of this old pdf file of mine is the reason why.
http://www.checktheevidence.
David Amos
I must Say I am rather impressed at CBC's sudden fit of Integrity to
allow my posts to stand the test of time for a few hours at least. (:
Rest assured that I have been saving digital snapshots just in case
they delete and block me as usual :)
In return here is an old scoop about CTV that CBC and everybody else
and his dog has been ignoring for 11 very long years after I ran in
the election of the 38th Parliament against the aptly named lawyer Rob
Moore.
http://thedavidamosrant.
----- Original Message -----
From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: I am curious
Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is
no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the
documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the
process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it
in my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We
will then provide you with a reply.
Martine Turcotte
Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
Tel: (514) 870-4637
Fax: (514) 870-4877
email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
Tel: (514) 870-4638
email: diane.valade@bell.ca« less
David Amos
Anybody bother to notice I am the only person posting here with a real
name and it is the same name that is on the ballot in Fundy Royal?
Do ya think the lawyer Rob Moore "The True Conservative" or any of the
others would dare to debate me in writing with their true name within
a website funded by the taxpayer and controlled by questionable public
servants? How about outside the CROWN"s domain within the Yankee
website called Twitter? That is where I play very serious Political
Hard Ball. See for yourself or ask Rob Moore's hero Stevey Boy Harper
if I am a liar or not.
https://twitter.com/
tony forward
I may be a little confused here, Is there not 5 candidates in this
Riding.. Humm. Seems you forgot the Independent candidate, David Amos
is running, heard him on the radio and has a u tube following, Funny
how u tube has become become more accurate than the CBC. Shame on you,
CBC. Lets just see if you will post this comment,,,
David Amos
@tony forward For the record CBC is well aware that I am the fifth
candidate. Hance Colburne of CBC moderated the debate in Hampton on
Oct 7th one before CBC posted on their website on Oct 14th his
interview with Rob Moore on CBC airwaves
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
David Amos
BTW Rob Moore and I know the truth about Randy Quaid's questionable
arrests in Canada and the USA. More importantly so does Randy I know
that for a fact.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/
"I never worried about being found guilty or any of that for any of
these charges because I know the truth, and I know the facts are going
to come out at some point, and today was a good sign of that," Randy
Quaid said
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
"Quaid and his wife Evi, a Canadian citizen, have been living in
Montreal since February 2013."
"Robert Gervais, an official with the Immigration and Refugee Board,
confirmed in an email to CBC News that a detention review hearing for
Quaid is scheduled for Thursday afternoon.
But the reason for the actor's arrest is unclear.
Quaid, 64, was detained Tuesday morning after attending a regular
check-in with CBSA officials in downtown Montreal.
Quaid's lawyer, Mark Gruszczynski, declined to shed light on the
affair or to reveal the reason for Quaid's arrest."
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:07 -0500
> Subject: Calls and E-mails to CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Cc: Rob Renaud <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> CBC personnel have contacted me concerning your calls and e-mails to
> them. As you are threatening legal action, would you kindly direct any
> further calls or correspondence to me. Other CBC personnel will not
> respond further to your correspondence or calls.
>
>
> Edith Cody-Rice
> Senior Legal Counsel
> Premier Conseiller juridique
> CBC/Radio-Canada
> 181 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1K9
> Postal Address: P.O. Box 3220, Station C, Ottawa K1Y 1E4
> Tel: (613) 288-6164
> Cell: (613) 720-5185
> Fax/ Télécopieur (613) 288-6279
>
> IMPORTANT NOTICE
> This communication is subject to solicitor/client privilege and
> contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to
> whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other
> distribution of this communication
> or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to
> anyone.
>
> AVIS IMPORTANT
> La présente communication est assujettie au privilège du secret
> professionnel de l'avocat et renferme des renseignements confidentiels
> intéressant uniquement leur destinataire. Il est interdit de
> divulguer, de copier ou de distribuer cette communication par quelque
> moyen que ce soit ou de donner suite à son contenu sans y être
> autorisé. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez nous en
> avertir immédiatement et le supprimer en évitant de le lire, de le
> copier ou de le transmettre à qui que ce soit.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
> Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:28 AM
> Subject: RE: I am curious
>
> Mr. Amos,
>
> I confirm that I have received your documentation.
>
> There is no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself,
> the documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in
> the process of printing it.
>
> I have asked one of my lawyers to review it in my absence and report
> back to me upon my return in the office. We will then provide you with
> a reply.
>
>
> Martine Turcotte
> Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
> BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
> 1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
> Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
>
> Tel: (514) 870-4637
> Fax: (514) 870-4877
> email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
>
> Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
>
> Tel: (514) 870-4638
>
> email: diane.valade@bell.ca
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos mailto:motomaniac_02186@
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 6:12 AM
> To: Turcotte, Martine (EX05453)
> Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca; W-Five@ctv.ca
> Subject: I am curious
>
> Madam
>
> I did not receive a response from you to the last email so I am not
> certain if you received it. I must inform you that I will be closing
> my briefcase in Yahoo for public view at the end of the week. I have a
> great deal of material to add and I only wish certain parties to view
> it. I opened it for you the other day as an act of good faith. Mr.
> Pozen can check my work in the dockets of the various courts around
> Boston they are a matter of Public Record my files are not. As you can
> see by this and some following emails. I am very busy dealing with
> criminal matters first before filing civil complaints in the USA. As I
> told you when you called a lot has been happening. I have made a lot
> of cops mad at me and I don't trust them a bit particularly after the
> Police Commission is willing to check their work so i have been busy
> watching my back and covering my butt. However that does not mean that
> I have not thought about our conversation and was curious about a few
> things.
>
> I was glad to receive your call and impressed by the fact that you
> were more than willing to receive the material and a copy of the
> wiretap tape in particular. Your stated willingness to uphold the law
> was a rare statement to me. However I was curious why you only
> mentioned my voicemail to Mr. Pozen and not the email to your company
> and the news program that it owns. Did they not inform you as well? If
> they didn't I am not surprised because I have some other rather
> interesting denials from the Media. the most interesting would have to
> be from the PBS program called Frontline when I introduced its
> producer Michael Sullivan to the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan. Now
> that is a story well worth W5 telling. Too bad they showed me their
> ass. As a courtesy to you and a further act of good faith, I will not
> forward this email to anyone else until after I return to the USA and
> nothing has been resolved between BCE and I and I am compelled to name
> it in my complaint. I would find it very hard to believe that Mr,
> Pozen does not know everything he needs to know about me right now.
>
> I had also called a lawyer, Steven Skurka who had a week long little
> special on CTV . I had tried to inform him that I knew my rights his
> assistant hollered at me. You from speaking to me yourself that I am
> not a rude character. I found it too funny to be treated that way and
> I had resolved to serve him this stuff byway of the local ATV Station
> that had presented his smiling talking head to me. That is why I was
> telling you that you could get this stuff from the local ATV station.
> I found it quite strange that you did not rely on them to send it on
> to you. Thus I must make an extra copy to comply with your request.
>
> I know the date stamp on the forwarded email is incorrect but that is
> because my old laptop goes to the first year in it when I boot up and
> sometimes I am too busy or tired to bother changing it. However MSN
> tracks it with the true date. Brad Smith and I have a bone to pick as
> well and I have been checking his work rather closely since he ignored
> my letter to him last year. His boss Bill Gates is gonna be very angry
> and Brad Smith and Steve Balmer in the near future if I have anything
> to do with it. If you do act ethically and immediately I will settle
> with your company very cheaply in comparsion to the bottom lines of my
> first two complaints. In fact I will be so impressed I will
> immediatlely offer you a better job than the one you have now. Please
> study the material I will provide you closely and ask me any thing you
> wish.
>
> I will do as I promised and send the material you requested as soon as
> I can put it all together. Right now I am on the move and far away
> from my printer. Is the following your correct address? Perhaps you
> should consider sending someone to the my meeting with the Police
> Commission in Fredericton next week in order to hear me speak of these
> matters to law enforcement before I return to the USA. Once I do
> return there I will serve the Mr. Pozen the material as promised and
> call him to testify in my pending trial. The following emails should
> explain some of my concerns to you. My wife will be in Canada next
> week as well to pick up our kids. I will allow you to speak to her if
> you wish. She has had a nervous breakdown over the legal crap and I do
> have her Durable Power of Attorney pursuant to M.G.L. 201 B. Mr. Pozen
> can ask Robert S. Creedon Jr. about that document. I argued it with
> him before the entire Judicuary Commitee on Sept. 18th 2003.
>
> I will call you in a minute to make certain that you get this and the
> following emails.
>
> David R. Amos
>
> Martine Turcotte
>
> 1000 de la Gauchetiere Ouest
> Floor 41
> Montreal, Quebec H3B 58H Canada
> Tel: (514) 870-4637
> Fax: (514) 870-4877
>
> For the Record I gave the Irving "Rag called the Gleaner" in Fat Fred
> City and the CBC dudes in Toronto copies of the following lawsuits in
> the USA in 2002 long before I gave some material to Bellglobemedia
> byway of their W-Five yo yos. Clearly nobody knows how to read if they
> don't think I ain't sued folks before EH?
>
> Ask W-Five or their lawyers if I am a liar or not. Better yet ask
> Stevey Boy Murphy or Andy Campbell in Fat Fred City if they dare to
> chaleenge the truth. If all else fails and you bloggers seek counsel
> you can trust why not ask Chucky Leblanc or your "Blogger General"
> T.J. Burke he received the same documents on June 24th, 2004 the day
> Danny boy Busierres and the Fat Fred City Finest attempted to banish
> me from the LEG but it ain't worked out to well for them yet EH Chucky
> Leblanc? However chucky was quick to report that I was banished the
> following day and ain't said apeep about it since. Who to you think
> told him not to talk about it? Kelly lamrock, T.J. Burke. the Irvings
> or all three?
>
> FYI W-Five took an interest in my matters at about the same time
> Chretien's underling was calling Bush a moron.(I oftern call myself an
> oxymoron Methinks somebody has been studing my words EH?) I supported
> Chretein's underling's thinking in two affidavits demanding judgements
> by default filed in the following dockets on December 12th, 2002.
>
> The following day Cardinal Law (Methinks that is why chucky hates me
> so) quit Beantown and ran off to the Holy See. Years later he helped
> pick the latest Pope(a former Hitler Youth who is making his bones
> with the croooked little Georgey Boy Bush Jr. right now in the USA.)
>
> Never Forget the Queen is the protector of the Faith of the Church of
> England . She would not allow her family's assests to be stolen and
> given to the catholic Church. Why should I act any different?
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: W-FIVE Viewer Mail
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:03 PM
> Subject: RE: possble story
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> I would like to thank you for your email to W-FIVE, sorry for the
> delay in responding.
>
> We review every email and story idea that we receive here at W-FIVE
> and give it serious consideration. Your email has been forwarded to
> our executive and senior producer for review. If we are interested in
> pursuing your idea further, you will be contacted by one of our
> researchers.
>
> Thanks again for your input. Your interest in our program is much
> appreciated.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Lisa-Marie
>
> Production Coordinator
>
> W-FIVE
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: a friend of David Amos' email account
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:28 PM
> To: W-FIVE@ctv.ca
> Subject: possble story
>
>
> I am a Canadian Citizen who thus far, as a plaintiff, has two Lawsuits
> in the US District Court of Massachucetts they are numbered 02-11686-
> RGS and 02-11687-RGS.
>
> They were removed to that Court from the Norfolk Superior Court by the
> US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan very improperly. However they shall
> remain there because of my status as a Canandian Citizen. Judge Sterns
> has not even held a Conference about the matters because he likely
> does not want to hear the matter because I have presented all Members
> of the Bar with their worst fear of a catch 22 problem.
>
> Accordinging to law he is late. I have complained of 47 defendants 34
> of whom are State Defendants( the Attorney General, The Commission of
> Judicial Conduct Board of Bar Overseers etc) and 3 are Federal
> Treasury Agents. Some of the defendants are over two months late in
> their answer to the Summons.
>
> The smallest suit amounts to 188 million dollars in the form of
> relief. There is a lot to these matters and too much to briefly
> explain. But in a nutshell my wife's Aunt, who is buried beside Rose
> Kennedy, left my wife some money. It was stolen by her relatives in
> executing the estate. No news there. But the crooks are very well
> connected politically and every part of the old crony network in
> Boston covered for them.
>
> The crook and our cousin, Charles J. Kickham Jr of the Kickham Law
> Office on Beacon St, has been past President of Bar Associations. He
> has sat on the Board of Governors of Harvard Law School etc. I have
> given much information to many members of the press who have simply
> ignored some interesting facts.
>
> What should be somewhat newsworthy is how far a wild colonial boy has
> come in prosecuting Pro Se the most profund Yankee carpetbaggers. My
> next two lawsuits Under title 18 are wickedly righteous. I have left
> one copy of much information in Saint John New Brunswick at a lawyer's
> Office, Mosher and Chedore 33 Charlotte St if some one wishes to view
> them. I can be reached at this Cell number 506 434- 1379
>
> David R. Amos
>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/pompeo-north-korea-kim-jong-un-1.4737897
North Korea says Pompeo made 'gangster-like' demands but he calls talks 'productive'
U.S. Secretary of State says Pyongyang officials commit to new discussions on denuclearization
Why Trump's trade war makes sense — if you're Trump
If the U.S. escalates its trade war, the rest of the world, starting with Canada, will be collateral damage
If one word could sum up how many Canadians feel about the Trump-shaped piano dangling over the country's economy, it would likely be "disbelief."
Sure, we know all about America First, Rust Belt jobs and Canadian dairy subsidies, but certainly, even U.S. President Donald Trump knows how much trade has helped to make Americans rich, many Canadians say to themselves.
The country's prosperity is so undeniable that it's easy, reasonable even, for Canadians to brush off Trump's anti-trade jeremiads as equal parts bluster, negotiating tactics and base-galvanizing political rhetoric.
Even with trade barriers now going up between U.S. and China, it remains hard to imagine that Trump would blow up the global trading system given how much U.S. workers would suffer, right?
Maybe not.
The national security reasoning the Trump administration initially used to justify steel and aluminum tariffs was widely seen as a pretext that allowed the White House to bypass Congress and use executive power to regulate trade and charge unilaterally down the path of protectionism.
Even more troubling for Canada's economic fortunes, though, would be if that justification were sincere. In that light, Trump's reliance on Peter Navarro, an economist best known for his radical views on China, as one of his top trade advisers is an ominous sign.
That's in part because Navarro is one of the few economic advisers who supports the protectionist trade policies Trump and his commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, are advocating, says Dan Ciuriak, a former deputy chief economist in Canada's Department of Foreign Affairs and now the head of his own consulting firm.
"There's not a single trade economist who agrees that what they're saying even makes sense, apart from Peter Navarro," Ciuriak said.
A professor at the University of California, Irvine, the 68-year-old, Harvard-educated Navarro wasn't always fixated on China. Early in his career, he believed in free trade and ran for mayor of San Diego as a Democrat.
His three books on the subject paint a dark picture of a world in which the U.S. and China are hurtling toward a reckoning, and not just on trade.
In the trailer for the documentary version of Navarro's second book, Death by China, a talking head opines, "China is the only major nation in the world that is preparing to kill Americans."
Until recently, such anti-China sentiment only existed far beyond the periphery of policy discussions.
In the U.S., trade policy has often taken a back seat to foreign policy. When viewed through Navarro's theories, moves such as saddling Canada and the European Union with auto tariffs, pulling out of NAFTA and the World Trade Organization, as Trump has threatened to do in the past, and opening up a trade war with China start to make sense.
Similarly, a president who sees China as a menace lurking around every corner wouldn't want the U.S. to rely on any foreign country for its economic or military needs.
While economists see steel and aluminum tariffs as a tax on U.S. consumers that makes everything from beer cans to F-150s more expensive, but when imports are seen as a national security threat, that cost appears necessary in order to allow the industrial capabilities thought to be critical to the country's defence to be repatriated.
The blueprint for Trump's retreat into Fortress America is becoming more visible. Following through on his threats to hit China with $500 billion in tariffs would effectively erect a trade wall across the Pacific. Auto tariffs would do the same across the Atlantic while abandoning NAFTA would sever economic ties with the rest of North America.
If the Trump administration keeps traveling this road, overseas markets are likely to dry up, and U.S. exporters will be the ones to take the early hits, as the case of Harley Davidson moving some of its production offshore has already shown.
Big U.S. multinational companies are also likely to suffer. Apple, for one, must already be shuddering at the thought of losing access to China, the world's biggest smartphone market.
An attempt to reshape the U.S. economy would run the risk of undoing the benefits of trade. That could result in a lower standard of living for Americans and potentially for Canadians, as well, given the integrated nature of our economies.
"Maybe if you're willing to stick it out, it's doable over the very long term, but the medium term is miserable," said Jacqueline Best, a political economist at the University of Ottawa.
"The medium term is full of job losses and dislocation."
A domestic market of 325 million people also makes an isolationist economic policy a more viable option than it would be for smaller nations. Trade just isn't as important to the U.S. as it is to most other countries. Exports account for only 12 per cent of U.S. gross domestic product compared to 31 per cent for Canada, according to World Bank data. Imports, similarly, comprise 15 per cent of U.S. GDP versus 33 per cent for Canada.
The White House may well veer off its current course, but if it doesn't, Canada may need to work with other countries to blunt the damage. That strategy is already taking shape in the form of multilateral trade deals and a co-ordinated effort to hit vulnerable Republican congressional districts with retaliatory tariffs.
Congress, which has the constitutional right to regulate trade, could potentially reclaim the trade file from the White House if November's midterm elections spur a renewed appetite to muster the veto-proof majority that is required to overturn the tariffs or revoke Trump's executive power to impose them.
Beyond economic considerations, an increase in U.S. protectionism also puts into sharper relief the so-called trade-peace theory, a time-tested idea that says countries that trade together don't go to war.
"One can hope the auto tariffs don't materialize, the steel tariffs are short term, that NAFTA gets back on its feet," said Best. "People have been hoping for the best for a long time, and it's pretty obvious now that was wishful thinking. If everyone is in a major recession or depression and we're fighting wars, is anyone winning?"
Sure, we know all about America First, Rust Belt jobs and Canadian dairy subsidies, but certainly, even U.S. President Donald Trump knows how much trade has helped to make Americans rich, many Canadians say to themselves.
The country's prosperity is so undeniable that it's easy, reasonable even, for Canadians to brush off Trump's anti-trade jeremiads as equal parts bluster, negotiating tactics and base-galvanizing political rhetoric.
Even with trade barriers now going up between U.S. and China, it remains hard to imagine that Trump would blow up the global trading system given how much U.S. workers would suffer, right?
Maybe not.
The influence of Peter Navarro, China hawk
The national security reasoning the Trump administration initially used to justify steel and aluminum tariffs was widely seen as a pretext that allowed the White House to bypass Congress and use executive power to regulate trade and charge unilaterally down the path of protectionism.
Even more troubling for Canada's economic fortunes, though, would be if that justification were sincere. In that light, Trump's reliance on Peter Navarro, an economist best known for his radical views on China, as one of his top trade advisers is an ominous sign.
- ANALYSIS | Warning signs as states revive Depression-era trade tactics
- A trade war is a political act of economic destruction: Don Pittis
"There's not a single trade economist who agrees that what they're saying even makes sense, apart from Peter Navarro," Ciuriak said.
A professor at the University of California, Irvine, the 68-year-old, Harvard-educated Navarro wasn't always fixated on China. Early in his career, he believed in free trade and ran for mayor of San Diego as a Democrat.
- Donald Trump crashes the Canada Day party: Aaron Wherry
- Tariffs 101: How Canada's counter-tariffs on U.S. goods work, and what they'll do
His three books on the subject paint a dark picture of a world in which the U.S. and China are hurtling toward a reckoning, and not just on trade.
In the trailer for the documentary version of Navarro's second book, Death by China, a talking head opines, "China is the only major nation in the world that is preparing to kill Americans."
Until recently, such anti-China sentiment only existed far beyond the periphery of policy discussions.
In the U.S., trade policy has often taken a back seat to foreign policy. When viewed through Navarro's theories, moves such as saddling Canada and the European Union with auto tariffs, pulling out of NAFTA and the World Trade Organization, as Trump has threatened to do in the past, and opening up a trade war with China start to make sense.
Fortress America
Similarly, a president who sees China as a menace lurking around every corner wouldn't want the U.S. to rely on any foreign country for its economic or military needs.
While economists see steel and aluminum tariffs as a tax on U.S. consumers that makes everything from beer cans to F-150s more expensive, but when imports are seen as a national security threat, that cost appears necessary in order to allow the industrial capabilities thought to be critical to the country's defence to be repatriated.
- Canada's retaliatory tariffs are coming — and they could hurt Canadians, too
- These are the places most vulnerable to U.S. tariffs
The blueprint for Trump's retreat into Fortress America is becoming more visible. Following through on his threats to hit China with $500 billion in tariffs would effectively erect a trade wall across the Pacific. Auto tariffs would do the same across the Atlantic while abandoning NAFTA would sever economic ties with the rest of North America.
Big U.S. multinational companies are also likely to suffer. Apple, for one, must already be shuddering at the thought of losing access to China, the world's biggest smartphone market.
U.S. less reliant on trade than some
An attempt to reshape the U.S. economy would run the risk of undoing the benefits of trade. That could result in a lower standard of living for Americans and potentially for Canadians, as well, given the integrated nature of our economies.
"Maybe if you're willing to stick it out, it's doable over the very long term, but the medium term is miserable," said Jacqueline Best, a political economist at the University of Ottawa.
"The medium term is full of job losses and dislocation."
- China has unused weapons in escalating trade war: Don Pittis
- U.S. tariffs take effect on $34B in Chinese imports as Beijing announces retaliation
A domestic market of 325 million people also makes an isolationist economic policy a more viable option than it would be for smaller nations. Trade just isn't as important to the U.S. as it is to most other countries. Exports account for only 12 per cent of U.S. gross domestic product compared to 31 per cent for Canada, according to World Bank data. Imports, similarly, comprise 15 per cent of U.S. GDP versus 33 per cent for Canada.
Congress, which has the constitutional right to regulate trade, could potentially reclaim the trade file from the White House if November's midterm elections spur a renewed appetite to muster the veto-proof majority that is required to overturn the tariffs or revoke Trump's executive power to impose them.
- Beyond NAFTA tweaks: How Trump's anti-trade talk could be bad for Canada
- Chocolate vs. steel: A look at Canada's strategic tariff retaliation strategy
Beyond economic considerations, an increase in U.S. protectionism also puts into sharper relief the so-called trade-peace theory, a time-tested idea that says countries that trade together don't go to war.
"One can hope the auto tariffs don't materialize, the steel tariffs are short term, that NAFTA gets back on its feet," said Best. "People have been hoping for the best for a long time, and it's pretty obvious now that was wishful thinking. If everyone is in a major recession or depression and we're fighting wars, is anyone winning?"