---------- Original message ----------
From: Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 03:45:58 -0700
Subject: Out of the office Re: Fwd: Methinks Andrea Johnson, Andrea
Anderson-Mason, Kathy Bockus, Tammy Scott-Wallace, Jill Green, Arlene
Dunn, Diane Carey, Sherry Wilson, Mary Wilson and Dorothy Shephard
disagree with Paryse Suddith et al N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for your message.

I am currently out of the office and not responding to emails at this time.

I will respond to any messages upon my return on Monday, Aug. 27.

All the best,
Nathalie

--


*Nathalie Sturgeon *
Reporter, Telegraph-Journal | Brunswick News Inc.
------------------------------

Mobile: 506-466-8150
sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com
https://tj.news
------------------------------


https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Methinks Andrea Johnson, Andrea Anderson-Mason, Kathy Bockus, Tammy Scott-Wallace, Jill Green, Arlene Dunn, Diane Carey, Sherry Wilson, Mary Wilson & Dorthy Shephard disagree with Paryse Suddith et al N'esy Pas?


 #nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/advocates-fewer-women-election-1.5699081




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos

Content disabled
Methinks folks should check the tally of of how many ladies Higgy et al have nominated in ridings that no doubt the PC Party will win easily N'esy Pas?

>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>
> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
> Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.caAlex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>
> ***
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>
> Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
> Alex Axiotis-Perez
> (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.caAlex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
> RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.compubliceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in
> CBC
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:17:08 -0300
> Subject: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
> To: irwinlampert@gmail.com, glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Barbara.Whitenect"<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
> <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Friday.Joe"<Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
> <Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-management-reviews-police-investigations-1.5670446
>
>
> Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
>
> Management reviews give previously hidden look at quality of RCMP
> investigations
> Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:00 AM AT
>
> "Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said he would be surprised if some of the issues found in the
> older reports continued to this day.
>
> "I saw very very few examples of police officers who would obviously
> violate an accused's rights under the charter," Lampert said of his
> time on the bench, referring to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>
> "Some were through inadvertence rather than malfeasance. In some cases
> they just didn't realize that they were doing something wrong and it
> would be pointed out to them and you would hope that it wouldn't
> happen again."
>
> New Brunswick is among three provinces where Crown prosecutors must
> approve charges before they are laid in court.
> Court issues
>
> A 2017 review of the Hampton detachment is generally favourable, but
> describes prosecutions abandoned or dropped.
>
> In three of 45 cases brought to the Crown by police, the evidence
> didn't support the charges. Issues with arrests in two of the 45 cases
> led to the Crown not prosecuting. The report pointed to a lack of
> supervision as a contributing factor.
>
> "When supervision is not taking place, solvable, prosecutable cases
> could result in acquittals or charges forwarded when not warranted,
> bringing liability to the organization and members," the report says."
>
>
>
>
>  30 Comments
>
>
>
> David Amos
> Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Henry
> I cannot think of a worse job than being a police officer. Working
> nights, deaths, domestic violence, distrust in law enforcement, and
> while trying to do your job the best you can, the very real
> possibility you make a split second mistake, and you yourself end up
> in jail the rest of your life!
>
> Terry Tibbs
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Paperwork, and the lack of the proper paperwork,
> could hardly be lumped in with split second mistaken decisions.
>
> Dan Moore
> Reply to @Bill Henry: Yes, policing is a difficult job, if it is your
> worst job don't become a police officer. We should demand only the
> best suited become police officers and you clearly don't fit the bill.
> Also be aware that in that 'split second' mistake that could end you
> up in jail could also take the life of an innocent person as we have
> seen happen in the US time and again though less so in Canada, it
> still occurs. Being a police officer should not put you above the law
> rather place you under greater scrutiny as it is their job to enforce
> it. All aspects of it including presumed innocence and other
> constitutional rights.
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: The RCMP are still playing dumb about falsely
> arresting me even after I sued the Crown and are inviting me to do so
> again Go Figure
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Matt Steele
> Irwin Lampert, a provincial court judge in Moncton who retired last
> year, said..... "Some were through inadvertence rather than
> malfeasance. In some cases they just didn't realize that they were
> doing something wrong and it would be pointed out to them and you
> would hope that it wouldn't happen again."
> That pretty much sums the problem up right there where police are not
> held accountable for their actions , and the people in the position of
> over seeing the Justice System let it slide , and hope that the police
> will do better . That combined with the militarization of the police
> is rapidly eroding the public's trust in the police and Justice System
> . You need to look no further than what is currently happening in the
> U.S. to see where things are eventually heading .When the only tool
> that the police have is a hammer , then every problem starts to look
> like a nail .
>
>
> David Peters
> Reply to @Matt Steele:
> Imo, you picked out the most important sentence in that article, but I
> have a completely different take on it.
>
> To me it shows there are checks and balances in place, in the system,
> that are working.
>
> However, I feel that the law & order bureaucracy in Canada is too
> insulated and lacks real transparency and accountability. Elections
> and short term limits for Judges, Crown Prosecutors and police chiefs
> would help solve the problem.
>
>
> David Amos
> Reply to @Matt Steele: Methinks you Irwin Lampert should check my work
> N;esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
>
> https://nbweddings.ca/about-me/
>
>
> :"For many years I was involved with various judges’ associations. I
> served terms as President of the New Brunswick Provincial Court
> Judges’ Association and the Canadian Association of Provincial Court
> Judges and was a Governor of the American Judges’ Association. For a
> number of years I was a member of the New Brunswick Judicial Council,
> a body which dealt with complaints filed against judges."
>
> J. Gilles Lemieux
> Called to the bar: 1990 (NB)
> Lemieux Ménard & Co
> Lawyer
> 4405 Route 115
> Saint-Antoine Sud, New Brunswick E4V 2Z5
> Phone: 506-525-9717
> Fax: 506-525-9509
> Email: glemieux@lemcolaw.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy <kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
>  sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Chaplin, Lynn (NBPC/CPNB)"&lt;Lynn.Chaplin@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 04:58:45 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
>> LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to dlete
>> my emails N'esy Pas/ Andrea Anderson-Mason.
>> To: David Amos &lt;motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Please be advised this account is not monitored.
>>
>> veuillez noter que ce compte n"est pas surveillé
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"&lt;Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 06:04:32 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the lawyer Rob McKee as the
>> LIEbrano Shadow Justice and Attorney General,was VERY STUPID to delete
>> my emails N'esy Pas Andrea Anderson-Mason???.
>> To: David Amos &lt;motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting me.
>>
>> A provincial election was called on August 17th and will be held on
>> September 14th. During that time, my constituency office is required
>> to be closed. The phone and email will not be monitored during this
>> period.
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Megan Mitton
>>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> Merci de m'avoir contacté. Des élections provinciales ont été
>> déclenchées le 17 août et auront lieu le 14 septembre. Pendant cette
>> période, mon bureau de circonscription doit être fermé. Le téléphone
>> et le courriel ne seront pas surveillés pendant cette période.
>>
>> Merci !
>> Megan Mitton
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/22/20, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 08:17:31 -0700
>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for
>>> the third time The pdf files hereto attached are for real
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>
>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick,
> please
>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at
> greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>> ‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 11:17:25 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Robert McKee I am calling you for the third time The
> pdf
>>> files hereto attached are for real
>>> To: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com, "brian.gallant"
>>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "chris.collins"<chris.collins@gnb.ca>, tj
>>> <tj@burkelaw.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coo>>
>>> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "greg.byrne"
>>> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>
>>>
>>> Robert K. Mckee
>>> Called to the bar: 2012 (NB)
>>> Fowler Law P.C. Inc.
>>> 69 Waterloo St.
>>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 0E1
>>> Phone: 506-857-8811
>>> Fax: 506-857-9297
>>> Email: robert.mckee@fowlerlawpc.com
>>>
>>>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-liberal-party-nomination-moncton-centre-1.4689918
>>>
>>> Robert McKee to run for the Liberals in Moncton Centre
>>> Lawyer won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, a spokesperson for
>>> the party says
>>> CBC News · Posted: Jun 03, 2018 4:50 PM AT
>>>
>>> Robert McKee, a 32-year-old lawyer and first-term Moncton city
>>> councillor, declared his candidacy for the Moncton Centre Liberal
>>> nomination on May 17. (Submitted)
>>>
>>> Robert McKee has won the Moncton Centre Liberal nomination and will
>>> run for the party in the upcoming provincial election this fall.
>>>
>>> The 32-year-old lawyer was elected to Moncton city council in May,
>>> 2016, representing Ward 3, and declared his candidacy for the Moncton
>>> Centre Liberal nomination on May 17.
>>>
>>> He won Saturday's nomination by acclamation, according to Duncan
>>> Gallant, a spokesperson for the party.
>>>
>>> The availability to run in Moncton Centre for the Liberals opened up
>>> after Speaker Chris Collins said he wouldn't reoffer for the party.
>>>
>>>     Speaker Chris Collins won't reoffer for Liberals, plans to sue
>>> premier for libel
>>>     8 Liberals quit over premier's 'humiliating' treatment of Chris
>>> Collins
>>>
>>> Premier Brian Gallant suspended Collins from the Liberal caucus on
> the
>>> basis of allegations of harassment made by a former employee of the
>>> legislature.
>>>
>>> Collins described Premier Gallant's handling of the allegations as
>>> "atrocious" and will finish his term as an independent.
>>>
>>> ​The election is scheduled for Sept. 24.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and
> managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady
> who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the
> Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by>>> 12, 2015, in which
>>>> Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of
> Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention
> a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the
> Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen
> Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that
> letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check
> the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including
> you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number
> of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be
> witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court
> of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and,
> retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should
> I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et
> al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party
> has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator
> of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.
> There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had
> sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau
> the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre
> à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more
> war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean
> Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second
> campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary
> to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There
> were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the
> dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins
> to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister
> Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that
> then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and
> babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by
> planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and
> control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital
> and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions
> of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC
> have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December
> 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I
> have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner
> Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com,
> riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our
> position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>>  Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister
> of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the
> Province
>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well
> Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY
>>>>> FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament
> baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the
> matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
> previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I.                    Introduction
>>>
>>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr.
> Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11
> million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and
> Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of
> a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19,
> 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two
> of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he
> believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed
> in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de
> la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
> Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and
> as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour
> d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal
> Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would
> no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement
> to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of
> that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which
> Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice
> Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos
> at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings
> were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice
> Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen
> May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer.
> The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In
> Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having
> thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the
> Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The
> Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or th>> lawyer. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by
> the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular
> circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there
> are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not
> to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor
> is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it ca>> trial judge could not remain impartial in
>>> the case. The mere fact
> that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he
> would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour
> a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six
> years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made
> it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in
> Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member
> of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no
> involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving
> Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true
> copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement
> authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for
> him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in
> the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At th>> both
>>> Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III.               Issue
>>>
>>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the
> Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV.              Analysis
>>>
>>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere
> with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary
> order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This
> Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in
> 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right
> of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to
> advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or int>> best, the Plaintiff’s action
>>> may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the
> Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In
> considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v.
> Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003
> SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff;
> and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that
> a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed
> sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of
> pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making
> bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the R>> engaged in
>>> deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred
> from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the
> RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V.                 Conclusion
>>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT
> DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:04:24 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a
>>> snap-election was flawed bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>>> understanding.
>>>
>>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>>
>>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>>> (506) 453-2144.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>>
>>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>>> veuillez visiter
>>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>>
>>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nou>> Email/Courriel:
>>> premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:04:18 -0300
>>> Subject: Methinks Higgs's rationale for a snap-election was flawed
>>> bigtime N'esy Pas?
>>> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, chris@duffie.ca,
>>> ron.tremblay2@gmail.com, aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca,
>>> jake.stewart@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
>>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
>>> <megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
>>> <kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
>>> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "dan.
>>> bussieres"<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"
>>> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "tyler.campbell"
>>> <tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@gnb.ca>,
>>> bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com, jjatwin@gmail.com, markandcaroline
>>> <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, sheppardmargo@gmail.com,
>>> jordan.gill@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> "David.Akin"
>>> <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
>>> carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
>>> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Furey, John"
> <jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>> "David.Lametti"<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>> "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
>>> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
>>> <premier@gnb.ca>
>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
>>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
>>> "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Fowler"
>>> <Shane.Fowler@cbc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
>>> <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, "Katie.Telford"
>>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>, postur
>>> <postur@fjr.stjr.is>
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>>>
>>>
>>> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
>>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>>> Methinks I should not have been surprised to see the VERY CORRUPT CBC
>>> block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter and in the very
>>> domain we all pay for with our tax dollars N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/higgss-rationale-for-no-snap-election.html
>>>
>>>  #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>>>
>>>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/provincial-election-covid-19-1.5691769
>>>
>>>  CBC's Facebook Live answers questions about provincial election
>>> Do you have questions about the election on Sept. 14? We have answers
>>>
>>> CBC News · Posted: Aug 19, 2020 10:44 AM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 46 Comments
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Methinks they will block me in Facebook just like they do in Twitter
>>> N'esy
>>> Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> BINGO
>>> Your account has been banned until September 3, 2020. Reason: We have
>>> banned this account for 15 days because we believe it is in violation
>>> of our Terms of Use. For more information, please visit:
>>> http://cbc.ca/submissions.
>>>
>>>
>>>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-premier-blaine-higgs-no-election-agreement-flawed-1.5685109
>>>
>>> Higgs's rationale for no-snap-election deal is flawed, says political
>>> expert
>>> Three byelections must be held this fall
>>>
>>> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 13, 2020 2:50 PM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 99 Comments
>>> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Methinks "political experts" make some of the best clowns in Higgy's
>>> circus but the Green Meanies take the cake N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> A false dilemma??? Too Too Funny
>>>
>>> "One thing that is very important to realize is that there's not two
>>> options here," Green MLA Kevin Arseneau said on his way in to the
>>> meeting. "It's not an election or a deal. That's like a false dilemma
>>> that's>> back door SANB Liberal or continue running as an uncommitted
>>> Green ?
>>> We know what Gauvins true colours always were ! Same as Arsenault !
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you must have enough clues between your
>>> ears to understand that a dilemma is a dilemma for the former SANB
>>> boss and that is no such thing as a false one N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: I see that you are obsessed with the SANB, grosse
> bee
>>> got!
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @David Amos: I think you are giving Lou Dumbell too much
> credit.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Jos Allaire: Welcome back to the circus Maggie
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Reply to @David Amos: Ah yes , the reincarnation of poor Maggie ! And
>>> we also know who Marc is now . With an Anglophone name to boot !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jason Inness
>>> I think Higgs has done a pretty good job. However, this is a
>>> disturbing trend that he is always looking for more power. He doesn't
>>> seem to consult his caucus on important decisions (i.e. the ER
>>> Closures), he wanted more power legislated into the EM Act (and
> backed
>>> down when he couldn't get the votes to pass it), and now he wants the
>>> opposition to declare two years of support for his government. If
> this
>>> is how he acts with a minority, can he really be trusted with a
>>> majority government?
>>>
>>> Jos Allaire
>>> Reply to @Jason Inness: I agree with you on everything except the
>>> first sentence.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks Maggie by any other name is like moth
>>> to flame N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Reply to @Jason Inness: Can the SANB Liberals be trusted any at all ?
>>> See their UNDISCLOSED 130 million dollar giveaway of taxpayers money
>>> !!! Obviously they can't !!!!!!!!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Al Borland
>>> If Higgs were to send Cardy packing back to the N D P , Greens, or
>>> Liberals where he belongs then he'd gain my vote. Otherwise, let's
>>> hope the P A N B do well.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Al Borland: Now thats funny. Methinks you PANB people
> should
>>> Google Cardy Higgs and butter tarts ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Peter Baxter
>>> Inconceivable.....
>>> Very much against tradition....
>>> Like Brian Gallant refusing to step aside when he did not have the
> most
>>> seats!
>>>
>>> So ... we know......inconceivable and very much against tradition
>>> ...are trade marks of the Liberals !
>>> "It would be very much against how custom and convention typically
>>> operate in Canada" ,...yep...that describes what Brian did....only
> two
>>> years ago...in a nutshell
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Peter Baxter: You understand that it is just a circus?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fred Brewer
>>> I smell desperation coming from the PC camp.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Fred Brewer: Me Too
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/robert-gauvin-election-former-deputy-premier-1.5690535
>>>
>>> Former PC cabinet minister runs for Liberals in Shediac Bay-Dieppe
>>> Robert Gauvin was deputy premier and minister of tourism in Blaine
>>> Higgs's cabinet until quitting
>>>
>>> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Aug 18, 2020 11:47 AM AT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 233 Comments
>>> Commenting is now closed for this story.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Methinks Higgy et al are well aware that I am overjoyed by the fact
>>> that Mr Gauvin donned a red coat and opted to remain in the circus
>>> N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Surprise Surprise Surprise
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @David Amos: Just when you thought you were having a good
>>> day, along comes the Beard.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Methinks you are just jealous that you can't
>>> grow one worth talking about N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jim Cyr
>>> He's an opportunistic disgrace to all Acadians.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks many Acadians appreciate his skills as>>
>>> these guys will do anything to guarantee the golden pension....say
> one
>>> thing to get votes and then follow whatever party line there
> is...it's
>>> disgusting...
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Content disabled
>>> Reply to @David Stairs: Methinks it par for the course that all
>>> politicians and public employees play N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Johnny Almar
>>> This is enough reason to ditch the Liberal party.
>>>
>>> Vickers will probably lose in Miramichi because the PA has a well
>>> liked and respected MLA there already.
>>>
>>> Insiders have balked at Vickers’ poor social skills and overall
>>> snobiness.
>>>
>>> Al Borland
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Let's hope the People's Alliance replace the
>>> Liberals as the official opposition. I see good things in the future
>>> for New Brunswick. A level of unity and pride that we haven't had for
>>> a long time.
>>>
>>> Janice small
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Thie is nothing exciting about Vickers, poor
>>> people skills,, no experience in gouvernment reminds of my
> grandfather
>>> when he talks, little no no charisma and really knows nothing about
>>> being Premier.. Just like Gallant,, but that's what the party wants a
>>> soft gumby who they can twist and bend and make him tow the party
>>> line.. God forsaken if they had somebody with a voice and an
> opinion..
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Johnny Almar: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks
> amazing
>>> things never cease N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Al Borland: Dream on
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Luke Armstrong
>>> Shediac Bay - Dieppe...do you they ever elect anyone but Liberals?
>>>
>>> val harris
>>> Reply to @Luke Armstrong: No and it shows they know what they are
>>> doin. Well done Shediac
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Luke Armstrong: French name, the vote is yours. Doesn't
>>> matter what kind of human garbage it is
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: Pretty nasty language there, Mr. Oliver ! I'm
>>> surprised CBC would, in this very situation, allow "human garage"
> such
>>> as that to which you so gingerly refer, to publish such offensive
>>> gibberish.
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Did I hurt your feelings? Awww
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Whats a human garage? I'm confused. If you're
>>> gonna go all moral police on someone get the nasty bits right at
>>> least, precious Mr blow
>>>
>>> Greg Windsor
>>> Reply to @val harris: well that is certainly where the money is being
>>> pumped into....
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: A gallant effort Ray, but you'"ll need to eat a
>>> few more Wheaties to get up to speed. I'll sip my Red Rose waiting
> for
>>> your arrival … ah, I'll make a pot. Lots of time … And, my feelings
>>> are damaged … but I'll make it. Ne pas worry.
>>>
>>> Ray Oliver
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: A "Gallant" effort. Perfect candidate for
>>> Shediac. Maybe prop one up like weekend at Bernies, he/she would win
>>> every time. Be about as useful too
>>>
>>> Jeff Leblanc
>>> Reply to @Ray Oliver: just mute this new guy who seems to be a
>>> condescending jerk. Thats what I'm doing. Then him and David Amos and
>>> Marc Martin can all play together in the sandbox with nobody' to
>>> bother them
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: Imagine me agreeing with you. Methinks amazing
>>> things never cease N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Brian Robertson
>>> It's always been us and them.
>>> The French always vote Liberal, so we either concede to them of vote
>>> Conservative.
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson: or...and here me out, you could vote
>>> purple. Then one day, not this election cycle or even next, but one
>>> day they might get enough seats to be a viable alternative. We will
>>> never know unless we give it a shot.
>>>
>>> Dan Lee
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson:
>>> What is it with you quys ..the french this ....the french that.......
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Dan Lee: well I mean come on. In NB the French are quite
>>> vocal and tend to be catered to by th>> bother me too but I've come to
>>> accept it will never change. Your food
>>> will taste better and the air will be fresher when you realize that
>>> sad fact.
>>>
>>> Dan Lee
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: bahahahaha.......yea......
> bahahaha...........
>>>
>>> Josef Blow
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: So, you appear to equate "Purple" (such a
>>> noble colour for such a petty party) with "Green", (as in the
>>> expression, "The grass is always greener on the other side".
>>>
>>> Someone once told me that the reason why the grass is likely "greener
>>> on the other side", is because that is where the septic tank is … . I
>>> think the idea fits the bill here.
>>>
>>> Jeff LeBlanc
>>> Reply to @Josef Blow: the only way the grass would be greener near
> the
>>> septic tank would be it it was leaking
>>>
>>> Natalie Pugh
>>> Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: We need to, now more than ever, force the
>>> change! Our children and grandchildren have been placed second best
>>> simply for not being able to speak a language that is fading away.
>>> After all what are the true stats of those who are unilingual french
>>> in NB....3%?? It's not about culture and never was. It's control over
>>> the job market and nothing else.
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Brian Robertson: Methinks you should explain to folks real
>>> slow why lots of French folks voted for Mr Gauvin in the last
> election
>>> or all the other Conservatives they have elected in the past
>>> particularly under the mandates of Hatfield, Lord and even Alward
>>> N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>> Brian Robertson
>>> Reply to @David Amos:
>>> I think you should explain this bizarre idiom you have adopted as
> some
>>> kind a signature preamble and postscript to all your comments.
>>> But, in the fullness of time and the plethora of my posts, you will
>>> find the answers to your query.
>>> It would be redundant of me to repeat it merely at your request.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Eric Plexe
>>> Robert Gauvin would not be the only political opportunist to change
>>> parties as Dominic Cardy was formerly the leader of the NB NDP.
>>>
>>> Mack Leigh
>>> Reply to @Eric Plexe:
>>> It is not about political conviction, ethics or strength of character
>>> but all about what Gauvin can benefit from this move..
>>>
>>> Terry Tibbs
>>> Reply to @Mack Leigh:
>>> Much the same as Mr Cardy then..............
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks Minister Cardy won't miss having to
>>> share his butter tarts with the former Deputy Premier as his former
>>> conservative cohort Mr Duffie challenges him for his seat N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Lou Bell
>>> Now all we need is for Arsenault to admit his also being another SANB
>>> Liberal .
>>>
>>> David Amos
>>> Reply to @Lou Bell: Methinks you forgot that when the liberals didn't
>>> want him to run for them last time he snubbed Higgy et al and ran for
>>> the Green Meanies instead N'esy Pas?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 22:37:46 -0300
>>> Subject: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the farm on anything a
>>> cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas?
>>> To: Amy.Sturgeon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
>>> glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
>>> <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
>>> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
>>> Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> "Barbara.Whitenect"<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
>>> <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>>> "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
>>> <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>> Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, "Shane.Magee"<Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
>>> "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca
>>> Cc: Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
>>> Patricia.Levesque@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, mot>> ---------- Original message
>>> ----------
>>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:01 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
>>> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
>>> understanding.
>>>
>>> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
>>> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>>
>>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>>> (506) 453-2144.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Bonjour,
>>>
>>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
>>> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
>>> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
>>>
>>> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
>>> veuillez visiter
>>> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
>>>
>>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>>
>>> Merci.
>>>
>>>
>>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
>>> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
>>> E3B 5H1
>>> Canada
>>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>>> Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Axiotis-Perez, Alex"<Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:14:56 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Please note that I am currently away from the office.
>>> For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Brooke
>>> Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca)
>>> Thank you!
>>> *****
>>> Bonjour,
>>> Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.
>>> Pour toute question urgente pendent mon absence, veuillez contacter
>>> Brooke Malinoski (Brooke.Malinoski@pmo-cpm.gc.ca)
>>> Merci !
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 01:15:00 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it would not be wise to bet the
>>> farm on anything a cop or lawyer or politician has to say N'esy Pas
>>> Cleveland Allaby?
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
>>> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>>>
>>> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
>>> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
>>> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our
> regular
>>> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>>>
>>> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
>>> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation
> to
>>> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
>>> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
>>> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
>>> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>>>
>>> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office
> if
>>> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
>>> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>>>
>>> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
>>> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>>>
>>> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
>>> as possi>> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
>>> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
>>> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> **
>>> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable
> Bill
>>> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
>>> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
>>> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
>>> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
>>> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>>>
>>> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre
> bureau
>>> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
>>> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
>>> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
>>> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
>>> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
>>> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>>>
>>> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
>>> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
>>> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
>>> courrier ?lectronique.
>>>
>>> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
>>> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>>>
>>> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> Cordialement,
>>>
>>> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
>>> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
>>> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
>>> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>

---------- Original message ----------
From: Mike Therien <therien.mike@brunswicknews.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 05:17:08 -0300
Subject: Re: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and Taxmen
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Please remove me from your distribution list.

Mike Therien
Editor, Telegraph-Journal

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018, 12:54 AM David Amos, <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 01:00:20 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC,
> Banksters and Taxmen
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
> directly to the Department of Justice at
> mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca
> or call 613-957-4222.
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>
> Merci
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Lebouthillier, Diane"<Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 20:48:50 +0000
> Subject: Réponse automatique : Your various correspondence about
> abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Diane Lebouthillier, ministre du
> Revenu national. Votre courriel sera lu avec soin et recevra toute
> l'attention voulue.
>
> Si votre courriel porte sur une demande de rencontre ou une invitation
> à une activité particulière, nous tenons à vous assurer que votre
> demande a été notée et transmise à notre adjointe à l'agenda.
>
> ***************************
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Diane Lebouthillier, Minister
> of National Revenue. Your email will be read with care and will
> receive every consideration.
>
> If your email relates to a meeting request or an invitation to a
> specific event, please be assured that your request has been noted and
> sent to our scheduling assistant.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<
> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 22:05:38 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Minister of National Revenue Diane Lebouthillier May
> I suggest that your minions do the right thing by me and my Income
> supplement?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC)"<PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000
> Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. David Raymond Amos
> motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes,
> and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.
>
> This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way
> the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning,
> tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups
> that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an
> opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main
> strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.
>
> The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system,
> and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive
> tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the
> government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax
> evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of
> offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate
> federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and
> $2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.
>
> More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more
> auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams,
> increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized
> sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations
> and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at
> promoters of abusive tax schemes.
>
> On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve
> its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to
> its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program
> recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance
> Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international
> projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of
> the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
> Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the
> Panama Papers leaks.
>
> These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to
> protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and
> technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax
> arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To
> ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at
> promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased
> audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal
> investigations where warranted, and better communication with
> taxpayers.
>
> To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is
> increasing notifications and warnings through its communications
> products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants,
> and community groups so that they can become informed observers who
> can educate their clients.
>
> The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other
> representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax
> schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can
> lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution,
> court fines, and jail time.
>
> Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal
> investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for
> tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total,
> the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million
> and 734 months of jail time.
>
> When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA
> consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate
> solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming,
> and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts
> owed are considered.
>
> More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance
> scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the
> CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many
> of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The
> CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the
> Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these
> structures.
>
> To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in
> March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG
> and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate
> Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie
> University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in
> relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain
> the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this
> review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA
> had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man
> file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA
> took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was
> concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were
> appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were
> consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The
> report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with
> the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no
> evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA
> employees involved in the case.
>
> Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA
> employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts
> of interests between their current duties and any subsequent
> employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada.
> Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in
> protecting the CRA’s integrity.
>
> The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of
> misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions
> on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in
> disciplinary measures up to dismissal.
>
> All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant
> Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding
> cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which
> coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines
> whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures
> that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that
> compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward
> for tips received.
>
> The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in
> place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who
> provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion
> that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the
> OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible
> informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on
> information the CRA received through the OTIP.
>
> With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and
> internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the
> CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income.
> For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting
> information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of
> $10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a
> proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that
> raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs
> totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800
> taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with
> approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60
> audits.
>
> In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for
> tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for
> aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works
> daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre
> (JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The
> CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the
> working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing
> collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong
> relationships with the international community, which will help it
> refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.
>
> The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of
> success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a
> result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts.
> Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts
> relating to large businesses and multinational companies.
>
> But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and
> investments are underway.
>
> Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who
> choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax
> strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians
> expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on
> this matter at canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/news/2017/03/
> statement_from_thehonourabledianelebouthillierministerofnational.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have
> provided is helpful.
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
> Minister of National Revenue
>
>
>
> https://www.telegraphjournal.com/kings-county-record/story/100712615/election-sussex-fundy-stmartins
>
>
> Sussex candidates split on work opportunities in N.B.
> TAMMY SCOTT-WALLACE Telegraph-Journal
>
> September 14, 2018
>  Participating in the Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins meet the candidates
> event, hosted by the Chamber of Commerce, are Progressive Conservative
> candidate Bruce Northrup; Fred Harrison of the Green party; Liberal
> Ian Smyth; Peoples Alliance candidate Jim Bedford and David Amos
> running as an Independent.
> Photo: Tammy Scott-Wallace/Telegraph-Journal
> SUSSEX • The rate in which families are leaving the province and the
> pain that causes the economy needs to be a primary focus in the
> Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins riding this election, said Progressive
> Conservative candidate Bruce Northrup.
>
> And to him, closing the door to the development of the province’s
> natural resources is the main contributor to the problem of
> out-migration.
>
> Differing political positions were represented during a meet the
> candidates event in the riding Wednesday night.
>
> “Why are they going west?” Northrup asked, answering his own question.
> “To work in oil fields, to work in natural gas.”
>
> Those who move away for work are often lost forever as they settle
> down and make their family there, he added. Northrup has been
> staunchly opposed to the moratorium on hydraulic fracturing Brian
> Gallant’s Liberal put in place following the last provincial election.
>
> “We have to develop our natural gas and natural resources to keep them
> here. They’re exiting by the hundreds,” Northrup said.
>
> Liberal candidate Ian Smyth, however, sees it differently.
>
> He believes there’s lots of work, but not the right “attitudes.”
>
> He talked about recent job interviews he was conducting on his farm
> where he was offering a $13 an hour job. The person he was supposed to
> interview didn’t bother to show up or call, and that happened five
> times, Smyth said.
>
> “There’s not a shortage of work. There’s all kinds of work,” he said,
> “but attitudes have to change.”
>
> People have the right to leave the province for better work
> opportunities, he added.
>
> “It’s all about choices – it’s a free country,” said the father of
> four young children.
>
> As someone who left his community of St. Martins where he was fire
> chief for 22 years to go to Alberta, Peoples Alliance candidate
> Bedford said, he knows how difficult it is to uproot. The low wages he
> was earning picking rocks, however wasn’t near enough. He sent six
> resumes to Alberta companies, and he received calls for work from all
> six of them.
>
> He lived there with his family for 10 years.
>
> “People are payments away from losing their homes,” Bedford said.
> “We’re fooling ourselves when we say how great we are. Look around
> your neighbourhood, look around this room.”
>
> Dollar figures on what the sweet spot should be for an adequate
> provincial minimum wage fluctuated among parties when the question
> came up.
>
> Independent candidate David Amos, who ran federally the last time
> around, says people are not earning what they need to survive. He
> believes $18 an hour is a fair paycheque.
>
> “Why can’t the working man earn what the old man gets?” he said,
> referring to his old age pension. He said often the working person
> still has a family to raise at home.
>
> But an appropriate minimum wage is not only about another couple bucks
> for the worker,  Bedford pointed out.
>
> “It’s a fine balancing act,” the Sussex businessman said. A $15
> minimum wage, he said, pushes closer to $35 an hour for the employer
> who has to contribute more for employment insurance and Canada Pension
> Plan for the worker.
>
>  A small crowd of voters attended the Sussex and District Chamber of
> Commerce event to meet the candidates of Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins on
> Wednesday night in Sussex Corner.
> Photo: Tammy Scott-Wallace/Telegraph-Journal
> That could mean fewer businesses, and in turn fewer jobs.
>
> “You have to look at what the full impact will be,” Bedford said.
>
> Minimum wage in New Brunswick is currently $11.25 an hour, which is
> similar to the other Maritime provinces.
>
> But the Liberals are committing as part of their election platform to
> increasing it to $14 an hour gradually, Smyth said.
>
> “People need $14 to survive,” he said.
>
> The Green party wants to do even better than that, said candidate Fred
> Harrison, by raising the amount $1 a year until it reaches $15.25.
>
> Northrup said the Tories are not committing to an increase.
>
> Amos, Bedford and Northrup all took aim at the controversial carbon
> tax the Liberals have committed to.
>
> “There’s no disputing climate change,” Amos said. “Mother Nature is
> going to do what she wants to do. New taxation isn’t going to fix it.”
>
> Bedford also believes it should be eliminated, as should taxes on used
> vehicles. There should also be a major drop in small business tax, he
> said.
>
> The  Progressive Conservative platform has a sharp focus on reducing
> taxes, Northrup said.
>
> “My favourite three words in our platform is ‘no more taxes’,” he
> said. “We want to put more money in your pockets.
>
> “At the end of the day we’re totally, totally taxed out.”
>
> It was a mild, small crowd of about 25 people that gathered to meet
> the candidates hosted by the Sussex and District Chamber of Commerce
> in Sussex Corner.
>
> The Chamber held a similar event in early August, before the writ was
> dropped.
>
> Wednesday evening’s event took place at the same time a televised
> debate among the provincial party leaders was happening.
>
> Fracking, which is often a hot topic in the Sussex region with the
> business community supporting it, received varying opinions during the
> panel discussion.
>
> Amos is against fracking.
>
> “If there’s nothing in it for all of us, why bother?” he said,
> referring to the companies that have more to benefit than New
> Brunswickers with its inadequate royalty structure.
>
> But Northup believes there’s a lot of benefit for New Brunswickers to
> use its own natural resources, from salt mined in Picadilly, to
> natural gas.
>
> In his opinion, too much is being brought into the province from outside.
>
> “We need to develop our own resources to benefit ourselves,” he said.
> People in the riding need to work, especially since the potash mine in
> the riding closed in 2016, taking hundreds of jobs with it.
>
> Bedford cannot reasonably expect there not to be hiccups along the way
> with any new developments, but feels “the benefits are going to
> outweigh the risks.”
>
> He too believes “we need to depend on ourselves. We need to get people
> working.”
>
> Harrison said potential risks need to be fully understood, but
> generally speaking he doesn’t oppose natural resource development.
>
> “I would still want to err on the side of the environment and
> encourage and develop more natural resources that are sustainable,”
> the artist said.
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.telegraphjournal.com/daily-gleaner/story/44198467/provinces-only-independent-candidate?source=story-related
>
> Province’s only independent candidate says he’s never voted
> TAMMY SCOTT-WALLACE Kings County Record
>
> October 8, 2015
>  David Amos Independent SUSSEX • One of the province’s most colourful
> characters this federal election says he knows a lot about politics,
> but he has never checked a ballot.
>
> “I never voted in my life,” David Amos, the province’s only
> Independent candidate, said in a meet-and-greet of candidates held in
> Sussex Tuesday night.
>
> “Understand the game, never played, never voted.”
>
> The mechanic used to run a motorcycle shop in Four Corners near
> Sussex, and added a lively component to the gathering that gave
> candidates of Fundy Royal a forum to speak to issues important to the
> riding, lead by the Sussex & District Chamber of Commerce.
>
> Incumbent Rob Moore, who is seeking re-election for the Conservatives,
> faced off with Amos at the polls before in 2004. At that time Moore
> took the riding by a landslide.
>
> Amos told the crowd he offers as an independent because there is no
> democracy with towing a party line, as he feels the other candidates
> do.
>
> “You know how they stand and you must say what they say,” Amos said of
> party lines. “I speak for the people. You’re my boss. I would make a
> deal with the devil if it behooves what the people want.”
>
> When someone in the crowd referred to a member of parliament as a
> leader, Amos objected.
>
> “The parliamentarian is your servant,” he said. “He works for you –
> he’s not your leader. If he re-offers, check his work.”
>
> The issue of representation came up when Patricia McKay asked from the
> audience whether parties would consider a better way for the electoral
> system to function. Last election, she pointed out, the majority of
> people did not vote for the Conservatives yet that party formed
> government.
>
> Simply put, said Moore, every riding chooses their representative
> which he sees as a fair way to choose a government.
>
> “The person with the most votes goes to Ottawa,” he said. The party
> with the most representatives become government.
>
> Amos said the system isn’t about to change.
>
> “Someone like Elizabeth May would have to be prime minister to change
> it,” the Independent candidate said, referring to the Green party
> leader.
>
> Alaina Lockhart believes there could be a new way of creating
> governments, and other countries can be looked at for examples in
> ensuring the best representation of all people.
>
> “This would be the last first-past-the-post election system,” she
> said. “We believe we can do better.”
>
> Green party candidate Stephanie Coburn said her party believes there
> needs to be democratic renewal, which allows for a system where the
> interests of each riding can be spoken through their MP without
> recourse. As it is, she said, the party whip tells members how they
> need to vote on issues.
>
> “And we’re very interested in proportional representation,” Coburn
> said, which would reflect all of the voters who elect them in
> proportion to their number instead of the winner-take-all system in
> place now.
>
> During the debate Moore went under fire by a member of the audience
> who asked why, after five opportunities to speak, he never once
> mentioned his leader Stephen Harper’s name.
>
> “I’m running to be member of parliament for this area,” Moore said.
> “You have to be able to stand on your own two feet.”
>
> He said he respects his leader and feels he has lead the country
> through considerable economic challenges. Through Harper’s leadership
> Moore is convinced Canada is an envied nation.
>
> He said he won’t, however, “ride on somebody’s coat tails” as he seeks
> re-election in Fundy Royal. His hope, he said, is people vote for what
> he has done the past 10 years in the riding based on his record.
>
> “Each of us here have to get elected – it’s our name on the ballot,”
> Moore said.
>
> Lockhart said she is proud to use her leader Justin Trudeau’s name.
>
> “I’m standing on my own two feet to be a representative of this area,”
> he said, “but you have to be proud of your leader as well.”
>
> Jennifer McKenzie, the candidate for the NDP, feels the Harper
> government failed in finding opportunities to improve the economic
> condition of the country.
>
> “And the Liberal plan is not much better,” she said. She believes like
> New Brunswick Liberal Premier Brian Gallant, Trudeau is “likely to do
> the opposite of what he said he would do during his campaign.”
>
> Amos laughed at the question directed at Moore.
>
> “He won’t say his boss’s name,” the Independent candidate said.
>
> He said, however, he is not only critical of Harper as the other
> parties tended to be during the evening.
>
> “I don’t like all the leaders,” he said to a chuckling crowd.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mike Therien <therien.mike@brunswicknews.com>
> > Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:35:58 -0400
> > Subject: Re: ATTN Mike Therien Because you played dumb
> > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >
> > I see that you are an independent candidate. I still have no idea why you
> > are emailing me and phoning and hanging up. If you have an issue, please
> > state it. Otherwise, please stop.
> >
> > *Mike Therien*
> > Editor | Telegraph Journal
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Telephone: (506) 645-3260
> > therien.mike@brunswicknews.com
> > https://www.telegraphjournal.com/
> > ------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 18:28:04 -0400
> > Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> > Taxmen
> > To: wallace.tammy@brunswicknews.com, "Jacques.Poitras"
> > <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peacock.kurt"
> > <peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com>, "Robert. Jones"
> > <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
> > <andre@jafaust.com>
> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> > Date: Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 12:02 PM
> > Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> > Taxmen
> > To: "Andre.Lareau"<Andre.Lareau@fd.ulaval.ca>
> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Customer Contact Centre <consumer.queries@fca.org.uk>
> > Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 14:04:38 +0000 (GMT)
> > Subject: RE: 20150925 David Amos - FSA complaint # ISS10441377 Yo
> > Minister George Osborne does anyone even w    [
> > ref:_00Db0K8yP._500b0Puckd:ref ]
> > To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >
> > Our ref: 203286755/ 41282294
> >
> > Dear Mr Amos
> >
> > Thanks for your further emails about KPMG and alleged tax evasion.
> > This response covers both your email to my colleagues  in the
> > complaint team, and also the one addressed directly to us.
> >
> > Tax evasion
> >
> > Tax evasion is the responsibility of Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs
> > (HMRC). They're the organisation in the UK that oversees tax law. As
> > you've got concerns about KPMG and their tax activities in the UK, you
> > can report this to HMRC. We can't act on reports of tax evasion.
> >
> > Also, I can't comment on media reports about action that may be taken,
> > such as the one you've sent me in the link. What we doWe auhtorise and
> > regulate financial services firms in the UK.
> > The types of firms we regulate include banks, mortgage brokers and
> > insurance providers.
> >
> > I realise this isn't the response you were hoping for, but trust that
> > I've clarified our position.
> >
> > Yours sincerely
> >
> > Nicola Grady (Miss)Associate
> > | Customer Contact Centre
> >
> > Financial
> > Conduct Authority
> >
> > Consumer Helpline: 0800 111
> > 6768
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 25 September 2015 16:04
> > To: investigations@cbc.ca; Andre.Lareau@fd.ulaval.ca; dean.buzza;
> > Complaints Scheme
> > Cc: David Amos; Consumer Queries; oig; oig
> > Subject: Fwd: RE FSA complaint # ISS10441377 Yo Minister George
> > Osborne does anyone even work in "Not So Merry" Old England?
> >
> >
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/kpmg-tax-sham-could-lead-to-criminal-investigation-experts-say-1.3223371
> >
> > CBC asked Lareau, an internationally recognized expert on tax law, to
> > visit the renowned  offshore haven in the Irish Sea in a bid to track
> > down answers about a KPMG tax scheme that the CRA is alleging was
> > "intended to deceive" authorities.
> >
> > "It really is a textbook case of a sham, when you look at the
> > documents," Lareau concluded.
> >
> > But he also cautioned that a criminal investigation would require a
> > higher burden of proof, both to collect evidence in the first place
> > and to obtain a conviction.
> >
> > And that the CRA would need to show that KPMG and its clients
> > knowingly deceived tax authorities.
> >
> > "They have to prove the intention to defraud the system," he said.
> >
> >
> >
> > https://www.fd.ulaval.ca/faculte/personnel/46
> >
> > André Lareau
> > Faculté de droit
> > Pavillon Charles-De Koninck
> > 1030, avenue des Sciences-Humaines
> > Bureau 2135
> > Université Laval
> > Québec (Québec)  G1V 0A6
> > Contact
> > (418) 656-2131, poste 3481
> > (418) 656-7714
> > Andre.Lareau@fd.ulaval.ca
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Customer Contact Centre <consumer.queries@fca.org.uk>
> > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:23:10 +0000 (GMT)
> > Subject: Financial Conduct Authority    [ ref:_00Db0K8yP._500b0Puckd:ref
> ]
> > To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> >
> > Dear Mr Amos,
> >
> > Thank you for your recent email addressed
> > to the whistle blowing department within the Financial Conduct Authority
> > (FCA).
> > Your email has been passed onto the contact centre as the most
> > appropriate department to reply to you.
> >
> > While I do appreciate you have concerns with KPMG in the US, the FCA
> > will be unable to intervene as we only regulate the KPMG entity based
> > in the UK. I can see from your email you have contacted the relevant
> > bodies in the US and Canada I suggest you continue to liaise with
> > them.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:18:15 -0400
> > Subject: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and Taxmen
> > To: Andrew.Treusch@cra-arc.gc.ca, John.Ossowski@cra-arc.gc.ca,
> > Richard.Montroy@cra-arc.gc.ca, irussell@iiac.ca, bamsden@iiac.ca,
> > ministre@justice.gouv.qc.ca, public.integrity@oag.state.ny.us,
> > dmills@cra.ca, dfrancis@nationalpost.com, dsimon@stu.ca,
> > rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, DAmirault@bankofcanada.ca,
> > ZLalani@bankofcanada.ca, victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, ibruce@petersco.com,
> > rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, tobin.lambie@cica.ca, jlisson@fasken.co.uk,
> > labe@fasken.com, george.greer@cica.ca, Rachel.degrace@payroll.ca,
> > Kerry-Lynne.Findlay@cra-arc.gc.ca, atip-aiprp@cra-arc.gc.ca,
> > atip-aiprp@bankofcanada.ca, jbutler@cppib.com, mmcdaid@cppib.com,
> > "roger.l.brown"<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> > Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
> > Kerry-Lynne.Findlay@parl.gc.ca, Philippe.Brideau@cra-arc.gc.ca,
> > Madonna.Gardiner@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Blair@cra-arc.gc.ca,
> > Doug.Gaetz@cra-arc.gc.ca, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
> > gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
> > "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, whistle <whistle@fca.gov.uk>,
> > Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
> > <whistleblower@finra.org>, "peter.mackay"
> > <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, Raynald
> > Lampron <Lampron.Raynald@psic-ispc.gc.ca>
> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "matt.taibbi"
> > <matt.taibbi@rollingstone.com>, "John.Lally"
> > <John.Lally@fredericton.ca>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>
> >
> >
> > ENJOY
> >
> > https://www.scribd.com/doc/281544801/Federal-Court-Seal
> >
> > https://www.scribd.com/doc/281442628/Me-Versus-the-Crown
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> > Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 19:19:07 -0400
> > Subject: Re: Media: Fundy Royal election story
> > To: Tamara Gravelle <gravelle.tamara@brunswicknews.com>
> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> >
> > Sorry but I am not on the Internet much lately and I just got your
> message
> > now.
> >
> > Ten years ago I returned to my traveling way. I have no home or phone
> > per se just a MagiJack (902 800 0369) You can call an leave a message
> > if you wish. However  I can only use it while on line and suffice to
> > say that I do not have an Internet provider so I rely on resturant
> > WiFi etc as I move about.
> >
> > Kinda busy lately I have a lawsuit I must  file Monday then see some
> > folks, I plan to be back in Susses next week to get my name on the
> > ballot and begin raising some Hell again. Perhaps you will get to see
> > me in action.
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Dave
> >
> > On 9/11/15, Tamara Gravelle <gravelle.tamara@brunswicknews.com> wrote:
> >> Hey David,
> >>
> >> I'm wrapping up the story I'm working on today. If you would like to
> >> contribute please give me a call at 433-1070 before 5 p.m.
> >>
> >> Thanks and I hope to hear from you soon,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Tamara Gravelle <
> >> gravelle.tamara@brunswicknews.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey David,
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately I won't be back in the office until 9:30 tomorrow. We
> >>> could
> >>> either do a phone interview then, or I can email you a list of
> questions
> >>> and you can send me back the response.
> >>>
> >>> What works best for you?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the story, it's definitely interesting.
> >>>
> >>> Tamara
> >>> On Sep 10, 2015 5:26 PM, "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I am online right now are you?
> >>>>
> >>>> FYI Here is what you folks wrote 11 years ago
> >>>>
> >>>> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
> >>>>
> >>>> By Erin Hatfield
> >>>>
> >>>> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
> >>>> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
> >>>>
> >>>> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
> >>>> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
> >>>> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
> >>>> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
> >>>>
> >>>> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
> >>>> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
> >>>> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
> >>>> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
> >>>> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
> >>>> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
> >>>> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
> >>>>
> >>>> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
> >>>> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
> >>>> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
> >>>> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
> >>>>
> >>>> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
> >>>> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
> >>>> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
> >>>> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
> >>>> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
> >>>> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
> >>>> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
> >>>> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
> >>>> response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
> >>>> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
> >>>>
> >>>> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
> >>>> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
> >>>> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
> >>>> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
> >>>> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
> >>>> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
> >>>>
> >>>> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
> >>>> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
> >>>> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
> >>>> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
> >>>> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
> >>>> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
> >>>> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
> >>>> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
> >>>> abiding citizens."
> >>>>
> >>>> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
> >>>> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
> >>>> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
> >>>> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
> >>>>
> >>>> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
> >>>> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
> >>>> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
> >>>> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
> >>>> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
> >>>> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
> >>>>
> >>>> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
> >>>> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
> >>>> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
> >>>> process for the June 28 vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
> >>>> favourite possessions-motorcycles.
> >>>>
> >>>> McKnight/KCR
> >>>>
> >>>> The Unconventional Candidate
> >>>>
> >>>> David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But..
> >>>>
> >>>> By Gisele McKnight
> >>>>
> >>>> FUNDY-He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
> >>>> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
> >>>> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
> >>>>
> >>>> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot-David Amos.
> >>>>
> >>>> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
> >>>> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
> >>>> running for office in Canada.
> >>>>
> >>>> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
> >>>> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
> >>>>
> >>>> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
> >>>> favourite place to do so-Fundy.
> >>>>
> >>>> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
> >>>> dissatisfaction with politicians.
> >>>>
> >>>> "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
> >>>> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
> >>>>
> >>>> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
> >>>> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
> >>>> needed to change his life.
> >>>>
> >>>> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
> >>>> sometimes in midlife."
> >>>>
> >>>> So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
> >>>> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
> >>>> Panhead motorcycle.
> >>>>
> >>>> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
> >>>> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
> >>>> renew your faith in mankind - you help anyone you can, you never ask
> >>>> for anything, but you take what they offer."
> >>>>
> >>>> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
> >>>> and conversation all over North America.
> >>>>
> >>>> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
> >>>> and a daughter and become a house-husband - Mr. Mom, as he calls
> >>>> himself.
> >>>>
> >>>> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms-a motorcyclist
> >>>> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
> >>>> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
> >>>> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
> >>>>
> >>>> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his
> >>>> life.
> >>>>
> >>>> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
> >>>> "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
> >>>>
> >>>> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
> >>>>
> >>>> "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
> >>>> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
> >>>> call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
> >>>>
> >>>> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
> >>>>
> >>>> "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
> >>>> not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."
> >>>>
> >>>> What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
> >>>> the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> >>>> name a few.
> >>>>
> >>>> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
> >>>> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
> >>>> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
> >>>> (NAFTA) out the window.
> >>>>
> >>>> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
> >>>> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
> >>>>
> >>>> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
> >>>>
> >>>> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
> >>>> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
> >>>> Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."
> >>>>
> >>>> Although.if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
> >>>> your X by his name.
> >>>>
> >>>> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
> >>>> say, 'what the hell.'"
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/9/15, Tamara Gravelle <gravelle.tamara@brunswicknews.com> wrote:
> >>>> > Hi,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I'm a reporter with the Kings County Record in Sussex and I heard
> you
> >>>> may
> >>>> > be running in the federal election this year in the riding of Fundy
> >>>> Royal.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I was wondering if this is true and, if so, if we could do a short
> >>>> > phone
> >>>> > interview for a story?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Please let me know what you think and when would be good for you.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Thanks,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > Tamara Gravelle
> >>>> > Reporter | Kings County Record
> >>>> > @TamaraEileenSTU <https://twitter.com/TamaraEileenSTU>
> >>>> > (W) 433-1070
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Tamara Gravelle
> >> Reporter | Kings County Record
> >> @TamaraEileenSTU <https://twitter.com/TamaraEileenSTU>
> >> (W) 433-1070
> >>
> >
>


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nathalie-sturgeon-1.4197581

Forestry group prepares plan to save Acadian forest

Group holds a workshop on saving the Acadian forest from climate change

Nathalie Sturgeon· CBC News· Posted: Mar 06, 2019 5:26 PM AT


Community Forests International is hoping to help preserve the Acadian forest, which grows in Atlantic Canada and some New England states, from the damaging effects of climate change. (CBC)
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices





Peter demerchant
Love the effort.... but it's a joke here in nb. There is one player making the calls in nb forests. People need to get out and see for themselves what's happening, they will be shocked. I spend alot of time in the woods and I can tell you the game plan here is clear, till, plant, spray and repeat. Oh ya and have a government funded propaganda dept telling people everything is fine, what a joke. As another writer said, take a pic of your favorite spot, it wont be there long 



Community Forests International. 

10 School Lane, Sackville, NB E4L 3J9

(506) 536-3738

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/12/david-coon-calls-for-basic-income.html

Sunday, 22 December 2019

David Coon calls for basic income guarantee to replace social assistance

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@Kathryn98967631 and 49 others 
Methinks all my political foes understand why the longer I listened to the Green Meanie Leader yap on CBC the more I considered running against him in the next election and why I posted only one comment N'esy Pas?


 #nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/david-coon-basic-income-guarantee-1.5400458




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY

RCMP Sussex New Brunswick

http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2005/09/sussex-gold-found-and-bernard-lords.html

Charles LeBlanc Political ADHD Activist

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Content disabled
Methinks everybody knows that I can easily prove that I am David Raymond Amos and the fact that Quebec never agreed with the Charter means it never took effect N'esy Pas?



 #nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/people-s-alliance-candidate-french-connection-acadian-1.5701007




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos@MConroyMLA and 2 others
Methinks you people should understand why I called your spindoctor and your friend Marc Allain the director of the Carrefour Beausoleil and asked them a simple question about the Charter after I read the @CBCNB spin today N'esy Pas?

 #nbpoli#cdnpoli


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/people-s-alliance-candidate-french-connection-acadian-1.5701007

An Alliance candidate's French connection

Michelle Conroy says she values her family’s Acadian roots, despite her stance on bilingualism

Jacques Poitras· CBC News· Posted: Aug 27, 2020 7:00 AM AT



People's Alliance candidate Michelle Conroy loves Acadian culture but not all of the laws and policies put in place to preserve French. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

When People's Alliance MLA Michelle Conroy rose in the legislature over the last couple of years to read the prayer at the start of the day, she did something unusual for a member of her party.

She recited the prayer in both official languages.

That sets her apart in a political party that made criticism of official bilingualism a central tenet of its platform in 2018.

Last year Conroy told a party meeting in Miramichi that the media had unfairly labelled the party anti-French.

"We read it all the time, that there is a misconception of what we stand for and what we do and how we feel," she said. "And I think a lot of people don't know or don't realize that I do come from an Acadian background."


Conroy's grandparents, Marcel and Alfreda Cormier, relocated from near Saint-Louis-de-Kent to Chatham in the 1950s. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Unlike her two colleagues from the last legislature, Alliance Leader Kris Austin and Rick DeSaulniers in Fredericton-York, Conroy has direct, firsthand knowledge of francophone life.

That includes how easily the language can be overwhelmed in a majority English community.
Conroy said she loves Acadian culture. But at the same time, she opposes many of the laws and policies put in place over several decades to preserve French amid New Brunswick's English majority — measures that didn't exist when her grandparents made a fateful move.

From Kent County to Chatham

Conroy's name before she was married was Cormier. Her grandparents Marcel and Alfreda relocated from near Saint-Louis-de-Kent to Chatham, now part of the city of Miramichi, in the 1950s.

"There was not a whole lot of French back then," she said.

"For years, the Cormier family was the only French family in Chatham," said Conroy's aunt, Della Drake-Daley, who was born before the move and who still speaks French today, including at occasional gatherings of fellow seniors looking to practise their mother tongue.


Michelle Conroy says she values her Acadian roots, but she opposes laws and policies aimed at slowing the assimilation her family experienced. 4:57

Her younger brother Donnie, Conroy's father, was born after the move to Chatham, so he grew up immersed in English.

"When Dad grew up, the family of course spoke French at home and then Dad would answer in English, so he never really spoke [French] either," Conroy said.

She said her father understands the language but doesn't speak it. Donnie Cormier sat in on the interview with his daughter and sister, which took place at his kitchen table, but he declined to be interviewed.

A common story

The Cormier story is a common one in New Brunswick, reflecting a demographic pressure that can squeeze the French out of a family in a generation or two.

According to Statistics Canada, the percentage of New Brunswickers with French as their mother tongue has declined from 35.9 per cent in 1951 to 32.4 per cent in 2016.


Conroy's father, Donnie Cormier, was born after the move to Chatham, so he grew up immersed in English. Her aunt Della Drake-Daley, who was born before the move, still speaks French. (Jacques Poitras/CBC )

It's particularly acute in Miramichi, a majority English area that draws in many residents of surrounding francophone communities for work.

"It's cultural gravity," said Marc Allain, the director of the Carrefour Beausoleil, a francophone community centre and school.

• Leaders talk money, isolation and hips and knees
• Higgs promises to confront homelessness 'head-on'

Without a French-language school option, "the reality is that the kid will be going to school in English, he'll be having Scouts in English, he's going to be having minor league [sports] in English.

"All of his formative experiences will be in that language and that's how he's going to perceive himself. … And that's the dynamic that we get into, built over generations."

A bulwark opposed by the Alliance

The school, which opened in 1985, is meant as a bulwark against that pressure. But it's part of the francophone school system, and the Alliance opposes the province's dual system.

Conroy said bilingual schools would allow all children to learn both languages, despite extensive social science research that shows francophone kids will tend to end up speaking English in such settings and lose their French.

Carrefour Beausoleil wasn't open when Conroy started school, and she didn't enrol in the late immersion that existed at the time.

"I kind of wish that I —" she began when asked if she regrets that.

"I don't regret not doing it," she continued. "I wish there was more French that was available then but … I remember at the time, even when I had the chance to go, I was worried about how my marks would be and things like that, changing languages."

Four tries for hospital job

Conroy decided to run for the Alliance in part because of her own experience trying to get a permanent job at the Miramichi Regional Hospital.

"I was denied employment four times," she said.

She held a casual position for eight years, dealing with the public and, she felt, doing a good job communicating in French. But a permanent position was out of reach.

It's impossible to blame individuals for something that is such a social phenomenon. It's just a question of opportunities and lack thereof.

- Marc Allain, director of Carrefour Beausoleil

"I could help anybody that came to the counter but if you didn't pass the test, you didn't get hired," she said.

Conroy said she had a "two" or "intermediate" ranking in the provincial public service language proficiency, and the job required a "two-plus."

According to the provincial system, a "two" means the employee is "able to satisfy routine social demands and limited work requirements."

"Two-plus" means they are "able to participate fully in general conversation."

Not long after her fourth attempt, she decided to run for the Alliance.

Pushing for changes

At recent four-party negotiations to try to avert a provincial election, Conroy recounted her experience and the Alliance pushed for positions requiring "two-plus" to be reduced to "two."

"All four parties agreed that it has to be looked at," Conroy said. In a Facebook message posted publicly by her party, she told a constituent that francophone Liberal and Green MLAs felt she had a point.


Marc Allain, director of the Carrefour Beausoleil, a francophone community centre and school, said only 51.5 per cent of the children in the Miramichi area who have the constitutional right to attend school in French are enrolled. (Mike Heenan/CBC)

"If anything, [the discussion] did knock down barriers and knock down some walls to let us talk about it," she said. "And I feel going forward, for the people that are lucky enough to get back in, we have something to go on."

Horizon Health doesn't comment on hiring decisions, but in a statement, vice-president Margaret Melanson said the authority takes its legal obligations seriously and bilingual service "is a key component of offering safe and quality care."

She said employees who can't offer service in a patient or visitor's chosen language must track down someone who can. She also said the network is working on new training and complaint processes and "a new language-proficiency testing model."

Aunt supports Alliance position

Conroy's aunt Della, who said she also missed out on a job years ago because her French wasn't good enough, agreed with her niece that language requirements are too onerous.

"She could do the job and she trained the person who replaced [her] — that doesn't make sense."

On the other hand, Della Drake-Daley said, her five children were all raised in English and did not follow French immersion, and four of them have jobs in New Brunswick.

"They made out fine," she said.

Impossible to blame individuals

Marc Allain said the relentless demographic pressure of assimilation is not the fault of any one parent or family.

"It's often more a question of lack of resources or lack of linguistic or cultural infrastructure than anything else," he said.

"It's impossible to blame individuals for something that is such a social phenomenon. It's just a question of opportunities and lack thereof."

Conroy said it was "just the way the system is and the way things happen. It's not even something that we even noticed growing up or even commented on."

From past to present

The past is past, but even today, in Conroy's own riding, francophones are still grappling with assimilation.

The school and community centre, which also houses a daycare, is hoping to expand. All 70 spaces at the daycare are full and there are another 68 children on the waiting list.

With 300 students, the school is also full, though according to a survey Allain commissioned, only 51.5 per cent of the children in the Miramichi area who have the constitutional right to attend school in French are enrolled.

The other 48.5 per cent are missing the chance to preserve their mother tongue, Allain said. But some families opt for less crowded English schools.

Two different stories

Allain is reluctant to talk politics but said Conroy has not supported the push for expansion.

It's an issue that touches so closely on the experience of her own family, yet at the same time the two stories could not be farther apart.

"I don't think it would surprise anybody that we do not share the same vision of the foundations of what this place was built on, the notion of duality and the fact that a francophone kid has the same rights to access to education as anybody else," he said.

"At this point with our local MLA, it's extremely difficult to find common ground because there's such a wide disagreement at the base."

For complete coverage | Links to all New Brunswick votes 2020 stories







139 Comments





JJ Carrier
The whole party is based on CoR-style racism and anti-French hoo-hah, so her background and views are moot...


Chachi Arcola 

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks everybody knows that I can easily prove that I am David Raymond Amos and the fact that Quebec never agreed with the Charter means it never took effect N'esy Pas?


JJ Carrier
Reply to @Jos Allaire: Which Archie Levesque you mean? I know a half-dozen just in the Charlo region alone...


JJ Carrier 


Jeff LeBlanc
Reply to @JJ Carrier: um it's dining room not basement. Nice YouTube channel though and I found 1 "interview" some woman did of you and I don't even believe it's real. Post links to articles you wrote on your channel if you are legit. Old timey hockey videos don't count. Then I'll share your channel link to everyone so they can see you are legit. Which you won't do...because you are not.




https://www.carbeau.ca/english2










https://www.facebook.com/michelleconroymla/


Re-Elect Michelle Conroy as your MLA for Miramichi on September 14th, 2020.. To order a lawn sign or get involved in the campaign call 506 773-6006.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:49:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti and Cameron Ahmad
should have a long talk with their boss ASAP N'esy Pas Madame
Wilson-Raybould and Mr Scheer?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.

---------- Original message ----------
From: charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 15:49:08 +0000
Subject: Autoreply
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting my parliamentary office.  This automated
response is to assure you that your message has been received and will
be reviewed as soon as possible, noting that constituents of Timmins -
James Bay will be given priority.  Due to the high volume of
correspondence received, I am not able to respond personally to every
inquiry.  In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded items will not
receive a response.

If you have submitted a request for assistance please insure you have
included your full name, your mailing address and daytime telephone
number.   To reach my community offices directly, please contact:

Timmins  1-866-935-6464

Kirkland Lake  1-866-504-2747

Cochrane  1-705-465-1315

Thank you kindly,

Charlie Angus
Member of Parliament for Timmins - James Bay


Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec mon bureau parlementaire. La
présente réponse automatique vous est envoyée pour vous informer que
votre message a été reçu et qu'il sera examiné le plus rapidement
possible,  la priorité étant accordée aux électeurs de Timmins - Baie
James.  En raison du volume élevé de correspondance reçue, je ne peux
répondre personnellement à chaque demande. Dans la plupart des cas,
les lettres anonymes, copies conformes et pièces transmises resteront
sans réponse.

Si vous présentez une demande d'aide, n'oubliez pas d'indiquer votre
nom au complet, votre adresse postale et votre numéro de téléphone
(jour).  Pour joindre directement mes bureaux locaux, veuillez
composer :

Timmins  1-866-935-6464

Kirkland Lake  1-866-504-2747

Cochrane  1-705-465-1315

Cordiales salutations,

Charlie Angus
Député de Timmins - Baie James



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:49:04 -0300
Subject: Methinks David Lametti and Cameron Ahmad should have a long talk with
their boss ASAP N'esy Pas Madame Wilson-Raybould and Mr Scheer?
To: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Cameron.Ahmad@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
"Nathalie.Drouin\"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, \"jan.jensen\"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, \"blaine.higgs\"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
\"Ross.Wetmore\"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, motomaniac333
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, \"Shane.Magee\"<Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>,
\"steve.murphy\"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, \"David.Akin\""
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, jordan.gill@cbc.ca, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Premier@ontario.ca,
mack.lamoureux@vice.com, lauralynnlive@gmail.com, Norman Traversy
<traversy.n@gmail.com>, CabalCookies <cabalcookies@protonmail.com>,
mcu@justice.gc.ca, warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca,
PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
editor@canucklaw.ca, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,
olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca, David.Lametti.a1@parl.gc.ca,
michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/chief-electoral-officer-prefers.html

Wednesday, 5 August 2020

Chief electoral officer prefers byelections over general election

https://www.linkedin.com/in/cameron-ahmad-30035355/?originalSubdomain=ca

• 
  
  
  
  

National Campaign Spokesperson | Porte-parole, campagne nationale

Company Name

Liberal Party of Canada • Parti Libéral du Canada

Dates Employed Aug 2015 – Nov 2015

Employment Duration4 mos

Location Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Press Secretary to the Liberal Leader | Attaché de presse du chef libéral

Company Name

House of Commons of Canada Chambre des communes du Canada

Dates Employed May 2014 – Aug 2015

Employment Duration1 yr 4 mos

Location Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Président / President

Company Name

Jeunes libéraux du Canada (Québec) / Young Liberals of Canada (Quebec)

Dates Employed Sep 2013 – May 2014

Employment Duration9 mos

Location Montréal, Québec, Canada

Le président des JLC(Q) siège sur le Conseil de direction et le Conseil d'administration du Parti libéral du Canada (Québec) et agit en tant que porte-parole officiel des jeunes libéraux fédéraux du Québec.
Les JLC(Q) forment l'aile jeunesse officielle du Parti libéral du Canada (Québec), regroupant tous les membres jeunes (âgés entre 14 et 25 ans) du parti résidant au Québec.

The President of the YLC(Q) serves on the Board of directors of the Liberal Party of Canada (Québec) and is the official spokesperson of federal Liberal youth in Quebec.
The YLC(Q) is the official youth wing of the Liberal Party of Canada (Quebec), consisting of all youth members of the party (between the ages of 14 and 25 years old) residing in Quebec. …

Traducteur indépendant / Freelance Translator

Company Name

OXO Translations

Dates Employed Aug 2013 – Mar 2014

Employment Duration8 mos

Location Montréal, Québec, Canada

Political Aide, Minister of Immigration / Attaché politique, ministre de l’immigration

Company Name

Assemblée nationale du Québec

Dates Employed 2012 – 2013

Employment Duration1 yr

Location Notre-Dame-de-Grâce, Québec, Canada

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Please note that I am currently away from the office.

For any urgent matters during my absence, please contact Alex
Axiotis-Perez (Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.caAlex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
>).

***

Bonjour,

Veuillez noter que je suis présentement absent du bureau.

Pour toute question urgente pendant mon absence, veuillez contacter
Alex Axiotis-Perez
(Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.caAlex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).



80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Phone: 613-992-4211
 

https://www.linkedin.com/in/alex-axiotis-perez-97623a141/?originalSubdomain=ca 

 Alex Axiotis-Perez

• Alex has a accExecutive Assistant to the Chief of Staff at the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada

• Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

https://opengovca.com/employee/Axiotis-Perez,_Alexandra#employer

Surname	Axiotis-Perez
Given Name	Alexandra
Title	Executive Assistant to the Chief of Staff / Adjointe exécutive au Chef de cabinet
Telephone Number	613-992-4211
Street Address	80 Wellington Street / 80, rue Wellington
City	Ottawa
Province	Ontario
Postal Code	K1A 0A2
Country	Canada
Department Name	Prime Minister's Office Cabinet du Premier ministre (PMO-CPM)
Organization Name	Office of the Chief of Staff Bureau de la Chef de Cabinet (COS-CDC)

Employees with the same organization

Full Name	Position	Department	Address
Katie Telford	Chief of Staff	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Ron Angeli	Special Assistant	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
John Sinfield	Special Assistant	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Elise Maiolino	Senior Gender and Diversity Advisor	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Brooke Malinoski	Manager, Office of the Chief of Staff	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2

Employees with the same department

Full Name	Position	Department	Address
Justin Trudeau	Prime Minister	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3
Gabrielle Cesvet	Senior Speechwriter	Prime Minister's Office	Langevin Block 80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Lindsay Gordon	House Manager	Prime Minister's Office	24 Sussex Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3
Cameron Ahmad	Director of Communications	Prime Minister's Office	Langevin Block 80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Samantha Khalil	Senior Manager, Issues Management & Parliamentary Affairs	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Patrick Travers	Senior Policy Advisor	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3
Jordan Deagle	Deputy Director, Communications	Prime Minister's Office	Langevin Block 80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Adam Scotti	Photographer	Prime Minister's Office	Langevin Block 80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3
Sebastien Belliveau	Deputy Director Issues Management & Parliamentary Affairs	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A2
Sarah Goodman	Senior Advisor	Prime Minister's Office	80 Wellington Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A3
Find all employees with the same department

---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:25 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca
>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>





https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @WandaMMason1and 49 others
Methinks Big Bad Billy Blair, Chucky Leblanc and Higgy et al should agree that it was not wise for CBC to delete my comments about the doings of Cardy and Lambert this evening N'esy Pas? 



https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/chief-electoral-officer-prefers.html



 #nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/standing-committee-talks-election-preparedness-1.5674262

Chief electoral officer prefers byelections over general election

Kim Poffenroth says byelections are good first test of new protocols

Mia Urquhart· CBC News· Posted: Aug 04, 2020 7:29 PM AT



Elections New Brunswick is preparing for upcoming byelections and the possibility of a general election. Either way, going to the polls during a pandemic will look different. (CBC)

The best contingency plan for holding an election during a pandemic is to not hold an election during a pandemic, according to Liberal MLA Roger Melanson.

"That would be the best case scenario for everybody to stay safe and be safe and don't have to worry about their public health during a pandemic," Melanson told a standing committee of the legislature Tuesday afternoon.

He told the hearing that New Brunswick shouldn't hold a general election in the shadow of COVID-19.

Premier Blaine Higgs hasn't ruled out making a snap election call.

Higgs lacks a majority in the legislature and the pending retirement of PC MLA Bruce Northrup will make it even harder for the government to win confidence votes and pass legislation.

At the very least, two byelections are required, with vacant seats in Saint Croix and Shediac Bay - Dieppe, and Higgs has said he isn't sure whether to call a general election or just go ahead with byelections.

He acknowledged last month that many New Brunswickers don't want to go to the polls in a pandemic.


Chief electoral officer Kim Poffenroth told a standing committee of the legislature that she's ready for a general election but would prefer to test new pandemic-related protocols on a smaller scale. (Graham Thompson/CBC)

Kim Poffenroth, the chief electoral officer at Elections New Brunswick, said the province is ready for an election, but that she would prefer to test the new procedures around pandemic safety with a byelection rather than a full-scale provincial election.

"It's really all about being able to test new procedures," Poffenroth told reporters after the hearing.

"Elections New Brunswick, I think rightfully, tends to be conservative when it comes to testing new procedures. So we like to test things at a small scale before we implement them on a large scale," she said.

Also, there are a number of things that Elections New Brunswick cannot pilot during a general election.

One of those would change the way votes are collected. Poffenroth said she'd like to run a test of telephone voting — and that can only be done during a byelection.

"Unfortunately, I don't have any authority to pilot that kind of novel voting process at a general election," she explained.

 Behind the scenes preparations underway to navigate risks of possible snap election

Moncton Centre Liberal MLA Rob McKee said the Liberals have heard that a campaign could begin as early as this week, which would put election day in early September.

During Tuesday's standing committee on "procedure, privileges and legislative officers," several politicians voiced their opposition to holding a general election.


Moncton Liberal MLA Rob McKee said it would be “irresponsible” to call an election in a pandemic. (CBC)

McKee told the hearing that it would be "irresponsible" to call an election in a pandemic.

He asked Poffenroth what contingency plans and safety protocols will be put in place. He also wondered what would happen if someone showed up at a polling station not wearing a mask.

The bottom line is that masks will not be enforced, said Poffenroth.

"One's right to vote is the most basic democratic right. It's No. 3 under the Charter of Rights," she told the committee.

Voters will be asked to wear a mask, but they will not be turned away.

"I don't believe I have the authority, constitutionally, to do that," she said.

• New Brunswick premier won't rule out snap election call

The staff at polling stations won't "get into a fight with somebody and throw somebody out of a polling location because they refuse."

While there are a few more powers that Poffenroth would like to see given to Elections New Brunswick, the power to stop an election is not one of them — not even during a pandemic.

"As the chief electoral officer, I did not want the authority to determine whether an election should be paused or put on hold."

She said "some additional flexibility to deal with public health emergencies" would be helpful in a pandemic, but the decision to halt an election should rest with the Legislative Assembly.

'Flatten the election curve'

Using a term from the pandemic lexicon, Poffenroth encouraged voters to "flatten the election curve" in an effort to reduce crowds at polling stations on election day.

She wants people to consider voting at advanced polls or at the returning office in their riding, or by using mail-in ballots.

And if they do vote on election day, she suggested avoiding peak voting times — on the way home from work and after supper.

"So trying to encourage people that can get out to vote early if they have some flexibility in their work, or if they don't work, to vote at those off-peak times."

Poffenroth told the committee that Elections New Brunswick has spent more than $1 million to make voting in a pandemic safer for everyone.

• ANALYSIS Higgs's popularity has soared, but PCs still struggling to unlock the francophone vote

All polling staff will wear masks and/or face shields, and masks will be provided to voters who don't have their own.

"We've spent a little over a million dollars and the largest portion of that is for masks and face shields both for our workers and voters."

She said each polling station will also have two additional COVID-related positions — a personal protection constable, who will explain the safety protocols, ask them to use hand sanitizer, and offer them a mask if they don't have one; and a roving constable, who will ensure high-touch points are properly sanitized.

Mail-in ballots

Poffenroth hopes that more people will use mail-in ballots.

She thinks there may be a misconception among voters that only those outside the province can use this method.

Elections New Brunswick has ordered an increased supply of mail-in ballots and bought $19,000 worth of stamps. Normally, voters were expected to pay their own postage, but under the circumstances, Poffenroth felt it was "appropriate" for Elections New Brunswick to foot the bill.

Opposition positions

Liberal Leader Kevin Vickers has said he does not want an election this year and said his party would not force an election.

Green Party Leader David Coon also said this isn't the right time for an election.

People's Alliance leader Kris Austin has said he doesn't think New Brunswickers want an election.








14 Comments





David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks Roger Melanson was just reminding the lawyer Kim Poffenroth who appointed her to her fancy job not long before the last writ was dropped N'esy Pas?













Ray Oliver
Why does Rob McKee look so scared? Did Amos just walk in and challenge him to a debate?


SarahRose Werner

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Why do you care about a Moncton lawyer you can't vote for anyway? Are you even a Canadian citizen yet?

























Gerry Ferguson
If people can work, go out to the stores, visit families, etc I can't imagine how voting would be so dangerous.


SarahRose Werner 






























Matt Steele
With a minority govt. in place for the past couple of years , and with three by-elections in the wings ; it would be wise to have a general election , and clear the air ; because failure at the polls during the by-elections could topple the govt. anyways . It sounds like many of the opposition MLAs are scared of an election because they might lose their seats along with their fat salaries , expense accounts , and gold plated pension plans .





























Terry Tibbs
So, I'm *guessing* that the money irregularities are all "fixed up", and we are all set to proceed with more of the same......................................


David Amos 





























Donald Gallant
A week with the polls open should suffice for this election.


David Amos 


























David News
If we can consider sending kids to school, opening the province for travel within the Atlantic Bubble, re opening for business, we can certainly hold an election.
Not that any of the politicians have shown or stated what they would do differently. Higgs doesn't have a mandate to deal with the fallout of Covid-19, the government could easily fall through the 2 by elections.
One final comment, migrating to phone in ballots is likely a step NB is not ready for. Cell phone calls are notoriously easy to hack/ intercept compared to landlines. VoIP depending upon the encryption used by the carrier are also an open question. Opening up phone in ballot taking could lead to a huge increase in identity theft as sophisticated criminals could eavesdrop on the call and get valuable information typically not easily accessible from the call  


David Amos













David Amos

Hot off the presses

"When pressed about when he will make a decision, Higgs wouldn't be pinned down. "

"So I'm sure that Elections New Brunswick ... can figure out a way that we can maintain democracy and move it in a direction that allows us to ensure we do it safely. And it would only be under those conditions of being able to do it safely that I would consider calling an election in the future."

Too Too Funny Indeed














David Amos
"Higgs said he has met with caucus to discuss the issue and will continue to do so. He said an election won't be called "without a clear understanding of how we can manage it safely, and how we can have an election that ensures that democracy continues to work as it needs to in order to govern our province."

Yea Right












David Amos

"Premier Blaine Higgs said he's not prepared to call a general election — at least not this week.

That was about as definitive as he got when asked during a Tuesday afternoon news conference."

YUP But Methinks there are 3 more Fridays to come before this month is history N'esy Pas?








--------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:38:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 09:43:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the
RCMP should check work very closely today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.compubliceditor@globeandmail.com
>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 06:38:17 -0300
Subject: Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the RCMP should check
work very closely today N'esy Pas?
To: "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, irwinlampert@gmail.com,
glemieux@lemcolaw.ca, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca,
"Barbara.Whitenect"<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Friday.Joe"<Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca>, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, premier.ministre@gnb.ca,
Alex.Axiotis-Perez@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "benoit.bourque"<benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "Shawn @ The Manatee"<shawn@themanatee.net>,
tj <tj@tjharvey.ca>, tj <tj@burkelaw.ca>, kedgwickriver
<kedgwickriver@gmail.com>, kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>,
"Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.fitch"<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "Wilson, Sherry Hon.(SNB)"
<Sherry.Wilson@snb.ca>, "margot.cragg"<margot.cragg@umnb.ca>,
"mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, Joel MacIntosh
<macintosh.joel@gmail.com>, "Stephen.Horsman"
<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "Stephane.vaillancourt"
<Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Harpelle"
<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, ron.tremblay2@gmail.com,
aadnc.minister.aandc@canada.ca, jake.stewart@gnb.ca,
andre@jafaust.com, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
"Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"
<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "dan. bussieres"
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>,
"tyler.campbell"<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"
<jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com, jjatwin@gmail.com,
markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, sheppardmargo@gmail.com,
carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
"David.Lametti"<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Fowler"<Shane.Fowler@cbc.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, postur <postur@for.is>,
postur <postur@fjr.stjr.is>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Shane.Magee"
<Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, jordan.gill@cbc.ca, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>

Whereas the RCMP, thier lawyers and their political bosses don't like
to read things perhaps they may enjoy reviewing some videos I made
after the Feds falsely arrested me and assaulted me  the DECH in Fat
Fred City 2008


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjonbmIti-o

The RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 1
326 views
Oct 15, 2010
MaritimeMalaise


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3IXzuc4QFLY

RCMP in Fat Fred City Pt 2
73 views
Oct 9, 2010
MaritimeMalaise


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nq9WozWEyAI

Speak of the Devil and Cst. Mark Blakely of the RCMP appears
372 views
Oct 9, 2010
MaritimeMalaise


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9tFll72Wcs

A Clip of Yankee Police surveilance wiretap tape 139 Sgt Moe loved this CD
44 views
Oct 9, 2010
MaritimeMalaise








https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/chief-electoral-officer-prefers.html


Wednesday, 5 August 2020
Chief electoral officer prefers byelections over general election

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies


David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @WandaMMason1 and 49 others
Methinks Big Bad Billy Blair, Chucky Leblanc and Higgy et al should
agree that it was not wise for CBC to delete my comments about the
doings of Cardy and Lambert this evening N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/chief-electoral-officer-prefers.html

 #nbpoli #cdnpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/standing-committee-talks-election-preparedness-1.5674262

Chief electoral officer prefers byelections over general election
Kim Poffenroth says byelections are good first test of new protocols

Mia Urquhart · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 7:29 PM AT



18 Comments



David Amos
Methinks Roger Melanson was just reminding the lawyer Kim Poffenroth
who appointed her to her fancy job not long before the last writ was
dropped N'esy Pas?





Ray Oliver
Why does Rob McKee look so scared? Did Amos just walk in and challenge
him to a debate?

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Ray Oliver: CBC uses that photo in any article where they
refer to McKee. I don't think they like him very much.

David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Methinks your buddies Chuckty Leblanc, former
speaker Chris Collins, his lawyer TJ Burke and everybody else knows
why the only lawyer the liberals have with a seat in the old maison so
to speak was afraid of me BEFORE the last election N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Why do you care about a Moncton lawyer you
can't vote for anyway? Are you even a Canadian citizen yet?






Gerry Ferguson
If people can work, go out to the stores, visit families, etc I can't
imagine how voting would be so dangerous.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Gerry Ferguson: I've scrutineered for a few elections and
the polling places can get fairly well jammed up at some times of day.
It can be managed, but a trial run in managing it - for example, in
by-elections - would be useful.

David Amos
Reply to @Gerry Ferguson: Exactly

David Amos
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks it should be fun to ask if you
worked as a scrutineer when I ran in Saint John Harbour in 2006 I
doubt you voted for me anyway N'esy Pas?






Matt Steele
With a minority govt. in place for the past couple of years , and with
three by-elections in the wings ; it would be wise to have a general
election , and clear the air ; because failure at the polls during the
by-elections could topple the govt. anyways . It sounds like many of
the opposition MLAs are scared of an election because they might lose
their seats along with their fat salaries , expense accounts , and
gold plated pension plans .

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Matt Steele:
Since when was "wise" ever a factor in a NB election?

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks it was on or about the 12th of Never






Terry Tibbs
So, I'm *guessing* that the money irregularities are all "fixed up",
and we are all set to proceed with more of the
same......................................

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: BINGO





Donald Gallant
A week with the polls open should suffice for this election.

David Amos
Reply to @Donald Gallant: I concur





David News
If we can consider sending kids to school, opening the province for
travel within the Atlantic Bubble, re opening for business, we can
certainly hold an election.
Not that any of the politicians have shown or stated what they would
do differently. Higgs doesn't have a mandate to deal with the fallout
of Covid-19, the government could easily fall through the 2 by
elections.
One final comment, migrating to phone in ballots is likely a step NB
is not ready for. Cell phone calls are notoriously easy to hack/
intercept compared to landlines. VoIP depending upon the encryption
used by the carrier are also an open question. Opening up phone in
ballot taking could lead to a huge increase in identity theft as
sophisticated criminals could eavesdrop on the call and get valuable
information typically not easily accessible from the call

David Amos
Reply to @David News: Welcome back to the circus



Tuesday, 4 August 2020
How the pandemic pushed puffin research back years

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Methinks before his old buddy Higgy drops the writ Chucky Leblanc
should admit that Cardy's concerns about his cat and butter tarts are
still pretty funny N'esy Pas?


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/how-pandemic-pushed-puffin-research.html


 #nbpoli #cdnpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/how-the-pandemic-put-back-puffin-research-on-canada-s-last-disputed-island-1.5672894


 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 16:39:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Chucky Leblanc before your old buddy
Higgy drops the writ you dudes must admit that Cardy's concerns about
his cat and butter tarts are still pretty funny N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca


How the pandemic pushed puffin research back years
COVID-19 has even affected a remote seabird research station in the
Gulf of Maine


Shane Fowler · CBC News · Posted: Aug 04, 2020 6:30 AM AT




11 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.



David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks Big Bad Billy Blair, Chucky Leblanc and Higgy et al should
agree that it was not wise for CBC to delete my comments about the
doings of Cardy and Lambert this evening N'esy Pas?




David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks before his old buddy Higgy drops the writ Chucky Leblanc
should admit that Cardy's concerns about his cat and butter tarts are
still pretty funny N'esy Pas?




David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks this must be a slow news day N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: FYI Minister Cardy's cat is named "Puffin"

Methinks before Higgy has the writ dropped somebody should research
Cardy Puffin and butter tarts N'esy Pas?




Tuesday, 4 August 2020
Internal RCMP reviews find illegal arrests, incomplete investigations
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Methinks former Attorney General Irwin Cotler knows why I was not
surprised that Irwin Lampert a former General Counsel for the Canadian
Jewish Congress would deny getting an email from me N'esy Pas?



https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/08/internal-rcmp-reviews-find-illegal.html



 #nbpoli #cdnpoli




https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-management-reviews-police-investigations-1.5670446



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 09:55:34 -0300
Subject: Why is that I am not surprised that Irwin Lampert a former
General Counsel
for the Canadian Jewish Congress would deny getting an email from me?



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 12:23:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Irwin Lampert Re what you and the RCMP say in CBC
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>




https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-management-reviews-police-investigations-1.5670446




73  Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.



David Amos
Methinks Bill Blair, Irwin Lampert and the RCMP should check work very
closely today N;esy Pas?


David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: "I hardly believe you've been unlawfully
arrested, goods seized time after time and now our precious Higgy
won't give you Medicare."

So YOU Say EH?



David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks the RCMP should also review my lawsuit N'esy Pas?

Ray Oliver
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: Go away. No one cares about the mess you surely
created. I hardly believe you've been unlawfully arrested, goods
seized time after time and now our precious Higgy won't give you
Medicare.

Ray Oliver
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: That's one awful streak of luck for one average
low key citizen!!!



>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
>> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>
>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>> Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>
>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>
>>
>>
>> Merci
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
>> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
>>
>> This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
>> know that every incoming email is read and reviewed.  A member of my
>> Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
>> follow-up is required.
>> Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
>> responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
>> non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
>>
>> In your email, if you:
>>
>> *         have verified that you are a constituent by including your
>> complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
>> will be provided in a timely manner.
>> *         have not included your residential postal mailing address,
>> please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
>> and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
>>
>> If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
>> contact your Member of Parliament.  If you are unsure who your MP is,
>> you can find them by searching your postal code at
>> http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
>>
>> Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
>> attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
>> 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
>> voicemails will be returned promptly.
>>
>> Once again, thank you for your email.
>>
>> The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
>> Wellington-Halton Hills
>> toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
>> Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
>> E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.camichael.chong@parl.gc.ca>
>> Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://www.michaelchong.ca>
>>
>> THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
>> AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
>> CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
>> copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
>> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
>> received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
>> delete this message from your system.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:18:40 -0400
>> Subject: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law school too N'esy
>> Pas Pierre Poilievre?
>> To: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
>> pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>> Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:44:16 -0400
>> Subject: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to law
>> school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler
>> Thompson?
>> To: info@jayshin.ca, jay@lonsdalelaw.ca, karenwang@liberal.ca,
>> lauralynnlive@gmail.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com, kgawley@burnabynow.com
>>
>> Jagmeet Singh on Tory opponent: 'Maybe he should go back to law school'
>> Conservative candidate Jay Shin said Singh was 'keeping criminals out
>> of jail' during his days as a criminal defence lawyer
>> Kelvin Gawley Burnaby Now January 13, 2019 10:27 AM
>>
>> Julie MacLellan
>> Assistant editor, and newsroom tip line
>> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com
>> Phone: 604 444 3020
>> Kelvin Gawley
>> kgawley@burnabynow.com
>> Phone: 604 444 3024
>>
>> Jay Shin
>> Direct: 604-980-5089
>> Email: jay@lonsdalelaw.ca
>> By phone: 604-628-0508
>> By e-mail: info@jayshin.ca
>>
>> Karen Wang
>> 604.531.1178
>> karenwang@liberal.ca
>>
>> Now if Mr Shin scrolls down he will know some of what the fancy NDP
>> lawyer has known for quite sometime
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Singh - QP, Jagmeet"<JSingh-QP@ndp.on.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:39:35 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
>> upcoming hearing on May 24th I called a lot of your people before High
>> Noon today Correct Ralph Goodale and Deputy Minister Malcolm Brown?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> For immediate assistance please contact our Brampton office at
>> 905-799-3939 or jsingh-co@ndp.on.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:18:35 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Minister Ralph Goodale and Pierre
>> Paul-Hus Trust that I look forward to arguing the fact that fhe Crown
>> filed my Sept 4th email to you and your buddies
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If
>> your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please
>> forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or
>> burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored.
>>
>> The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of
>> services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has
>> become vacant.  The party Whip supervises the staff retained under
>> these circumstances.
>>
>> Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of
>> Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will
>> continue to provide services to constituents.
>>
>> You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at
>> (604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway,
>> Burnaby BC.
>>
>> Office Hours:
>>
>> Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm
>> Friday 10am - 12pm
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
>> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
>> of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
>> Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>> ________________________________
>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
>> Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
>> signature under applicable law.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
>> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
>> did she take all four copies?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
>> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>>
>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>>  Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I.                    Introduction
>>
>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III.               Issue
>>
>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV.              Analysis
>>
>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>
>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V.                 Conclusion
>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irwin-lampert-former-moncton-judge-codiac-regional-policing-authority-1.5175053
>
> Former Moncton judge takes on new role with the law
> Social Sharing
>
> Irwin Lampert retired after he spent 30 years as a Moncton provincial
> court judge
> Kate Letterick · CBC News · Posted: Jun 14, 2019 7:27 AM AT
>
>