David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others


Methinks Mr Trump and his lawyers have yet to settle with me about the many documents and wiretaps I gave Mr Mueller and his cohorts in 2003 long before I ran for a seat in the 39th Parliament N'esy Pas? 


 https://scribd.com/doc/265620671/Cross-Border-Txt





#nbpoli#cdnpoli



 https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/robert-mueller-roger-stone-russia-investigation-trump-commute-sentence-1.5646624

Robert Mueller defends Russia probe, says Roger Stone 'remains a convicted felon' in op-ed

Washington Post opinion piece comes after Trump commuted sentence of ally

The Associated Press· Posted: Jul 11, 2020 7:01 PM ET



Former U.S. special counsel Robert Mueller testifies before a House intelligence committee hearing in Washington in July 2019. (Leah Millis/Reuters)

Former U.S. special counsel Robert Mueller sharply defended his investigation into ties between Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, writing in a newspaper opinion piece Saturday that the probe was of "paramount importance" and asserting that a Trump ally, Roger Stone, "remains a convicted felon, and rightly so" despite the president's decision to commute his prison sentence.

The op-ed in The Washington Post marked Mueller's first public statement on his investigation since his congressional appearance last July. It represented his firmest defence of the two-year probe whose results have come under attack and even been partially undone by the Trump administration, including the president's extraordinary move Friday evening to grant clemency to Stone just days before he was due to report to prison.

Mueller said that though he had intended for his 448-page report on the investigation to speak for itself, he felt compelled to "respond both to broad claims that our investigation was illegitimate and our motives were improper, and to specific claims that Roger Stone was a victim of our office.

"The Russia investigation was of paramount importance. Stone was prosecuted and convicted because he committed federal crimes. He remains a convicted felon, and rightly so," Mueller wrote.

Mueller did not specify who was making the claims, but it appeared to be an obvious reference to Trump, who as recently as Saturday derided the investigation as this "whole political witch hunt and the Mueller scam."




The mere publication of the op-ed was striking in itself for a former FBI director who was tight-lipped during the investigation, refusing to respond to attacks by the president or his allies or to even make public appearances explaining or justifying his work.

In his first public appearance after the conclusion of his investigation, Mueller had said that he had hoped his report would speak for itself. When he later testified to U.S. House of Representatives lawmakers, he was similarly careful not to stray beyond the report's findings or offer new evidence.
But that buttoned-up approach created a void for others, including at the Justice Department, to place their own stamp on his work. Even before the report was released Attorney General William Barr issued a four-page summary document that Mueller said did not adequately capture the gravity of his team's findings.

The op-ed traced the basis for the Stone prosecution, with Mueller recounting how Stone had not only tampered with a witness but also lied repeatedly about his efforts to gain inside information about Democratic emails that Russian intelligence operatives stole and provided to WikiLeaks, which published them in the run-up to the election.

Those efforts, including his discussions with Trump campaign associates about them, cut to the heart of Mueller's mandate to determine whether anyone tied to the campaign co-ordinated with Russia in the hacking or disclosure of the stolen Democratic emails.

WATCH | Trump commutes friend Roger Stone's prison sentence:



Roger Stone was sentenced in February to three years and four months in prison for lying to Congress, witness tampering and obstructing the House investigation into whether the U.S. president's campaign colluded with Russia to win the 2016 election. 4:07

Stone was particularly critical, Mueller writes, because he claimed inside knowledge about WikiLeaks' release of the stolen emails and because he communicated during the campaign with people known to be Russian intelligence officers.

"We did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired with the Russian government in its activities," Mueller wrote. "The investigation did, however, establish that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome.

It also established that the campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts."









973 Comments






John Perry
"Robert Mueller defends Russia probe, says Roger Stone 'remains a convicted felon' in op-ed"

Everyone who is speaking honestly about this topic knows you're right Mr. Mueller.
Commuting Stone's sentence is a massive abuse of power.
^ By voting to end the Senate impeachment trial of Trump without calling any witnesses or evidence: 51 Republican Senators betrayed their nation, participated in a cover-up and denied justice to the American people.


David Amos
Reply to @John Perry: Methinks Mr Trump and his lawyers have yet to settle with me about the many documents and wiretaps I gave Mr Mueller and his cohorts in 2003 long before i ran for a seat in the 39th Parliament N'esy Pas?


Hubert McTavish
Reply to @David Amos:
I once knew a woman named Tory Amos who lived in Livingstones Cove Nova Scotia. She drove a snow plough in the winter and pogey throughout the summer.


David Amos 





















Sidney Watts
Looking more like a banana republic every day. 


David Amos
Reply to @Sidney Watts: Methinks many folks must have found it interesting that a few days before his lawyer pal Michael Cohen was returned to jail in dispute over Trump Book N'esy Pas?

Michael D. Cohen, President Trump’s onetime lawyer and fixer, was in good spirits on Thursday when he arrived at a Manhattan federal courthouse, where he expected to complete routine paperwork related to his home confinement amid the coronavirus pandemic.

Mr. Cohen, who was released from prison in May on a medical furlough, was stunned when probation officers asked him to sign a document that would have barred him from speaking to reporters or publishing a book during the rest of his sentence, his legal adviser said.

Mr. Cohen, believing the agreement violated his First Amendment rights, refused to sign it, the adviser, Lanny Davis, said. Less than two hours later, federal marshals stepped out of an elevator with handcuffs and took Mr. Cohen back into custody.

Mr. Cohen’s return to jail was the latest twist in a case whose dizzying ups and downs have prolonged the legal woes of a man who once said he would take a bullet for Mr. Trump and later implicated the president in federal crimes.

Continue reading the main story

In a statement, the federal Bureau of Prisons said that Mr. Cohen had been returned to jail after he “refused the conditions of his home confinement.”

As a federal inmate, the bureau said in a separate statement, Mr. Cohen must comply with bureau policies, including requirements that he consent to electronic monitoring and obtain approval for any media interviews. 

Last week, Mr. Cohen said on Twitter that he anticipated releasing a book in late September. Mr. Davis said on Thursday that the book was ready for publication and would recount Mr. Cohen’s experiences working for Mr. Trump for years. 

Mr. Cohen testified before Congress last year that he had previously turned down a deal worth around $750,000 to sell a book about his time working for Mr. Trump that was tentatively titled, “Trump Revolution, From the Tower to the White House, Understanding Donald J. Trump.”

Continue reading the main story

As part of his home confinement, probation officers asked Mr. Cohen on Thursday to agree to eight conditions, including “no engagement of any kind with the media, including print, TV, film, books, or any other form of media/news,” according to a copy of the document obtained by The New York Times.

The purpose of the prohibition, the document said, was to “avoid glamorizing or bringing publicity to your status as a sentenced inmate serving a custodial term in the community.”

Mr. Cohen pointed out to the officers that he had spoken to reporters while he was in prison, Mr. Davis said. 

After Mr. Cohen refused to sign the agreement, the probation officers said they would try to work out a resolution, Mr. Davis said. 

Mr. Cohen and another of his lawyers, Jeffrey Levine, waited about 90 minutes, Mr. Davis said. Three federal marshals then arrived and, without warning, began to take Mr. Cohen into custody.

“He had the rug pulled out from under him,” Mr. Levine said in an interview.

At that point, Mr. Davis said, Mr. Cohen relented and agreed to sign the document to avoid returning to jail. The marshals continued to take him into custody anyway, Mr. Davis said, with one of them saying, “It’s out of our hands.” 

A spokesman for the U.S. Marshals Service did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Mr. Cohen was brought to a federal detention facility in the city, according to two people briefed on his legal status.

Continue reading the main story

Mr. Cohen, who pleaded guilty in 2018 to campaign finance violations and other crimes, was released from federal prison on May 20 on a medical furlough and allowed to return to his home. He had asked to be released because, he said, he had medical conditions that might be worsened by the virus’s spread in prison.

It was expected that after finishing the medical furlough, he would serve the balance of his sentence under home confinement, abiding by a strict set of rules. But a final decision on that had not been made, officials said.

Before his release, Mr. Cohen had been serving a three-year sentence at a minimum-security camp next to a federal prison and detention center in Otisville, N.Y., about 75 miles northwest of New York City. He was scheduled to complete his sentence in November 2021, according to the prisons bureau.

The federal crimes that Mr. Cohen pleaded guilty to were connected to a scheme to pay hush money to two women — a former adult film actress and a former Playboy model — who claimed they had affairs with Mr. Trump before he was president. 

During his guilty plea in August 2018, Mr. Cohen pointed the finger at the president, telling the court that Mr. Trump had directed him to make the hush payments for the purpose of influencing the 2016 election. Mr. Trump has denied the allegations.

During his furlough from prison, Mr. Cohen was photographed on July 2 having dinner at a sidewalk table outside Le Bilboquet, a French restaurant near his Park Avenue apartment, according to The New York Post, which published the photograph.

The authorities did not contact Mr. Cohen after the episode and he did not believe it violated the terms of his release, Mr. Davis said.

Ben Protess and Benjamin Weiser contributed reporting.

Maggie Haberman is a White House correspondent. She joined The Times in 2015 as a campaign correspondent and was part of a team that won a Pulitzer Prize in 2018 for reporting on President Trump’s advisers and their connections to Russia. @maggieNYT
 

William K. Rashbaum is a senior writer on the Metro desk, where he covers political and municipal corruption, courts, terrorism and broader law enforcement topics. He was a part of the team awarded the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for breaking news. @WRashbaum•Facebook
 

Nicole Hong covers law enforcement and courts in New York. She previously worked at The Wall Street Journal, where she was part of a team that won the 2019 Pulitzer Prize in National Reporting for stories about secret payoffs made on Donald Trump's behalf to two women.

A version of this article appears in print on July 10, 2020, Section A, Page 23 of the New York edition with the headline: Trump Fixer Back in Jail After Clash Over Publishing Book.

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @MaudeBarlow @ElizabethMay @dimitrilascaris@paulmanly





https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/monday-7th-of-march-2016-attn-dimitri.html



#nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://dimitrilascaris.org/in-the-news/







---------- Original message ----------
From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 19:27:42 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: This email easily proves what Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson said to Norman Traversy and her fans on July 7th at the 45 minute 30 second mark of her YouTube stream is not true
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting me. This automated response is to assure you that your message has been received. I welcome comments and questions from constituents.

Due to COVID-19, my constituency and hill offices are closed to walk-ins and in-person appointments. We continue to provide services to constituents via email and by phone.

I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email) than the average MP. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis, however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not be able to respond personally to each one.

My constituents in Saanich-Gulf Islands are my highest priority. If you are a constituent, please email elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca. To help me serve you better, please ensure that your email includes your full name and street address with your postal code. You may also call my constituency office at 250-657-2000.

If you are not a constituent, please contact your MP’s office for assistance. You can enter your postal code here if you are unsure who represents you.

If you require details on the resources available to Canadians regarding COVID-19, please visit my website.

You may also visit my colleague Paul Manly’s website.

Or, please read below for more information.

Thank you once again for contacting me.

Elizabeth May, O.C.
Member of Parliament
Saanich - Gulf Islands
Parliamentary Leader of the Green Party of Canada


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 19:58:21 -0400
Subject: Attn Dimitri Lascaris Perhaps we should talk ASAP? My # is 902 800 0369
To: dimitri.lascaris@siskinds.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.votedimitri.ca/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:53:25 -0400
Subject: Attn Sigmundur Davíð Gunnlaugsson Re My contacts with Iceland
and my lawsuit in the Federal Court of Canada
To: sdg@althingi.is, einarg@althingi.is, adalheidura@althingi.is,
reykjavik@piratar.is, klm@althingi.is, thorunne@althingi.is,
valgerdurg@althingi.is, sjs@althingi.is, thorsteinns@althingi.is,
bjorto@althingi.is, karlg@althingi.is, netfrett@mbl.is,
news@icenews.is
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, astah@althingi.is,
>.
Alternatively, write to: The Correspondence & Enquiry Unit, HM
Treasury, 1 Horseguards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ or telephone 020 7270
5000.

If you are a resident of the Tatton constituency, please ensure that
you have included your full postal address and postcode so that we can
identify you as a constituent. We receive a large volume of emails
every day and will reply to your message as soon as possible.

The Tatton Office, which is for constituents only, can be reached on
01565 873 037. If you are unsure whether George Osborne is your MP,
you can check by using this utility: http://findyourmp.parliament.uk

If you are a personal contact, your e-mail will be forwarded to Mr
Osborne accordingly.

Office of the Rt Hon George Osborne MP
First Secretary of State & Chancellor of the Exchequer
Member of Parliament for Tatton

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 16:34:22 +0000
Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
and questions from constituents.

I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email)
than the average MP. My office replied to over 400,000 pieces of
correspondence 2014. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis,
however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not
be able to respond personally to each one.

My constituents in Saanich-Gulf Islands are my highest priority. If
you are a constituent, please email
elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca<mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca>. To
help me serve you better, please ensure that your email includes your
full name and street address with your postal code.

For meeting requests and invitations, please email
requests@greenparty.carequests@greenparty.ca>.

Thank you once again for contacting me.

Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P.
Member of Parliament for Saanich-Gulf Islands
Leader of the Green Party of Canada

--

Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec moi. La présente réponse vous
confirme que votre message a été reçu. Les questions et les
commentaires des électeurs sont toujours les bienvenus.

Je reçois une correspondance (postale et électronique) beaucoup plus
abondante que le député type. Mon bureau a répondu à plus de 400 000
lettres en 2014. Tous les messages électroniques sont lus
régulièrement, mais, en raison de l'abondance des courriels reçus à
mon bureau, il se peut que je ne sois pas en mesure de répondre
personnellement à chacun d'entre eux.

Mes électeurs de Saanich-Gulf Islands passent en premier. Si vous êtes
un électeur, veuillez écrire à
elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca<mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca>.
Pour m'aider à mieux vous servir, veillez à ce que votre courriel
comporte votre nom complet, votre adresse municipale et votre code
postal.

Pour les demandes de rencontre et les invitations, veuillez écrire à
requests@greenparty.carequests@greenparty.ca>.

Je vous remercie encore d'avoir communiqué avec moi.

Elizabeth May, O.C.
Députée de Saanich-Gulf Islands
Chef du Parti vert du Canada


On 1/21/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Methinks I will give the latest US Consul General, Steven Giegerich,
> lin my neck of the woods a call this morning to see who has a bigger
> file on each other and ask him the obvious question about J. Russell
> George..
>
> Obviously I heard Giegerich say he was talking to the RCMP in Fat Fred
> City just before I appeared in Federal Court. I bet when he said that
> that both the CBC and the US State Dept was wondering if my name came
> up EH Ast Com Roger Brown?
>
> https://player.fm/series/information-morning-fredericton-from-cbc-radio-new-brunswick-highlights/consul-general
>
> Whereas J. Russell George has afmitted knowledge of my concerns in
> writing several times perhaps he should blow the whistle himself
> before I sue him personally.
>
> Hereto attached are some of documents that are now before Federal
> Court right now.
>
> The text of my filings can be found here.
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> Your lawyers will have to query the docket to see the CROWN's filing
> as they contain an amazing amount of desperate bullshit that I could
> not possibly scan.
>
> This was what was said in the past month before the court during oral
> arguments pertaining to Federal Court File no T-1557-15
>
> Dec 14th
> https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> Jan 11th
> https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
>
> Meet the IG:  J. Russell George this is what brags about himself
>
> https://www.treasury.gov/tigta/about_ig.shtml
>
> this is some of what I wrote about J. Russell George as his
> Conserative cohorts three years ago
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/j-russell-george-of-irs-versus-prez.html
>
> Monday, 3 June 2013
> J. Russell George of the IRS versus Prez Obama
>
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/9092510/Chicago
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 17:27:53 -0300
> Subject: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
> Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch
> Industries??? If anyone should know about such things it is Olson
> after all he assisted Ashcroft and Bush against me
> To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Office@tigta.treas.gov, RBauer@perkinscoie.com,
> mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov, "Gilles.Moreau"
> < Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, ron.klain@revolution.com,
> dboies@bsfllp.com, tolson@gibsondunn.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> "ed.pilkington"<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, news
> < news@thetelegraph.com.au>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com, gregory.craig@skadden.com,
> Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com
>
> Hey
>
> As Harper sits and bullshits his cohorts in the Council of Foreign
> Relations in the Big Apple today I bet he was listening to what was
> happening with Obama and the IRS and Holder and his DOJ minions
> in Washington.
>
> Hevery body and his dog knows Harper knew about my battles with the
> US Treasury and Justice Depts way back when he was the boss of the
> opposition in Canada's Parliament. Two simple files easily found on
> the Internet cannot be argued.
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Chief Counsel, Treasury.
> Inspector General for Tax Administration, (202) 622-4068.
>
> When Teddy bitches about polticians using the IRS to attack their
> enemies because he knows it true because he helped Bush the IRS
> against me when Obama was just a State Senator . The proof was when I sent
> him
> the documents that came along with the letter found on page 13 of this
> old file Teddy Baby Olson quit as Solicitor General.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
> Harper and every body else knows It was no coincidence that I sent the
> lawyers Olson as Solicitior General, Ferguson as the co chair of the
> Federal Reserve Bank, and J Strom Thurmond Jr the youngest US
> Attorney the same pile of documents on April Fools Day 2004.
>
> The sad but terrible truth is that legions of cops, lawyers polticians
> and bureaucrats in Canada and the USA knew about the US Secret Service
> coming to my home after dark on April Fools Day 2003 bearing false
> allegations of a presidential threat and threatening to use their
> implied right to use exta ordinary rendition against me as a non
> citizen less than two weeks after the needless War in Iraq began and
> no WMD were ever found.
>
> You can bet dimes to dollars i called some Yankee Inspector Generals
> (starting with 202 622 4068) and reminded them that I am still alive
> and kicking and reminding the world of their malicious incompetence
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> PS Below you can review some emails I sent you and your Yankee cohorts
> such asTeddy Baby Olson before Obama was reelected EH Harper? In truth
> I would rather settle in confidence with Obama then sue the Hell out
> of the CROWN and the Holy See Trust that the evil old Judge Bastarache
> has known why for a very long time.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: "Rob Talach"<rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>
> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
> a lot to you
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To:
> Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 7:43 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re the IRS Tom 330-592-1848
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 19:25:43 -0300
> Subject: Re the IRS
> To: tom.zawistowski@ohiolibertycouncil.org
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <stephen.m.cutler@jpmorgan.com>; <andrew.r.kosloff@jpmorgan.com>;
> < newsonline@bbc.co.uk>; <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>;
> < Rupert.Murdoch@fox.com>
> Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> < Charles.O'Donnell@gnb.ca>;
> < john.barthelmes@dos.nh.gov>; <sbloch@bcounsel.com>; "oig"<oig@sec.gov>
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 1:42 AM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called about the IRS etc I bet the former Yankee
> Attorney Generals Mukasey, Gonzales and Ashcroft remember me EH Mr Bauer
> and
> Mr Harper?
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:47:12 -0400
> Subject: You people can't say that I did not call and try to tell you
> stuff about Bernard Madoff and his pals
> To: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
> rbernard@bakerlaw.com, roxanne.taylor@accenture.com,
> daniel.prince@accenture.com, gary.a.morgenstern@accenture.com,
> david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
> mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com
> Cc: oig oig@sec.gov
>
> http://www.scribd.com/doc/10975148/Providian
>
> FYI I called Andrew Kosloff of JP Morgan Chase (212-552-4672) and told
> him to remind his boss Stephen Cutler that i am still above ground and
> still Rasing Hell
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 19,468
> Domain Name rr.com ? (Commercial)
> IP Address 74.66.242.# (Road Runner)
> ISP Road Runner
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : New York
> City : New York
> Lat/Long : 40.7619, -73.9763 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Macintosh MacOSX
> Browser Safari 1.3
> Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1440 x 900
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit May 23 2013 12:57:15 am
> Last Page View May 23 2013 1:02:11 am
> Visit Length 4 minutes 56 seconds
> Page Views 2
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...6mdLPQ&sig2=GKYqfMXb
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words "andrew kosloff"
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time May 22 2013 11:57:15 pm
> Visit Number 19,468
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 21:00:02 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called about the IRS etc I bet the former Yankee
> Attorney Generals Mukasey, Gonzales and Ashcroft remember me EH Mr
> Bauer and Mr Harper?
> To: cmitchell@foley.com, media@truethevote.org,
> mbmukase@debevoise.com, argonzales@wallerlaw.com,
> info@ashcroftgroupllc.com, ap@theprestongroup.org,
> info@mikesullivanforsenate.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, RBauer
> < RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
>
> Now this was beyond ridiculous
>
> https://www.mikesullivanforsenate.com/
>
> http://www.truethevote.org/news/true-the-vote-files-suit-against-the-irs
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <info@gomezforma.com>
> Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 10:24 PM
> Subject: I just called 617 249 4113 about Mr Gomez running for the Senate
>
>
> http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/04/supporters_of_republican_senat.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 21:00:02 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: I just called about the IRS etc I bet the former Yankee
> Attorney Generals Mukasey, Gonzales and Ashcroft remember me EH Mr
> Bauer and Mr Harper?
> To: cmitchell@foley.com, media@truethevote.org,
> mbmukase@debevoise.com, argonzales@wallerlaw.com,
> info@ashcroftgroupllc.com, ap@theprestongroup.org,
> info@mikesullivanforsenate.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, RBauer
> < RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>
>
> Now this was beyond ridiculous
>
> https://www.mikesullivanforsenate.com/
>
> http://www.truethevote.org/news/true-the-vote-files-suit-against-the-irs
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <georgiateapartypatriots@gmail.com>; <dlightman@mcclatchydc.com>;
> < debbie0040@yahoo.com>; <KHall@mcclatchydc.com>;
> Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; <Ottawa@efc-canada.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 7:22 PM
> Subject: I just called about the IRS etc
>
>
> http://www.miamiherald.com/2013/05/16/3401235/irs-scandal-puts-the-caffeine.html
>
> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/tea-party-irs_n_3272237.html?utm_hp_ref=elections-2012
>
> http://www.newsmax.com/US/tea-party-irs-apology/2013/05/13/id/504227
>
> Atlanta Tea Party Patriots
> This is the group for all of Atlanta Tea Party Patriots. While all the
> metro Tea Party Patriots group fall under the Atlanta Tea Party, we
> encourage each respective county to have their own group so you can
> get to know your fellow Tea Party Patriots in your area.
>
> Local Coordinators:
> Julianne Thompson ~ georgiateapartypatriots@gmail.com 404-798-4663
> Debbie Dooley ~ debbie0040@yahoo.com
> Jenny Beth Martin
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <v.tubin@uwinnipeg.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:53 PM
> Subject: Fwd: I just called AGAIN
>
>
> From: Dean Peachey <d.peachey@uwinnipeg.ca>
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 16:51:45 -0500
> Subject: Re: I just called AGAIN (Out of office)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be working out of the country untiil Friday, May 24, with
> intermittent access to email, and may be delayed in responding to
> correspondence. If the matter is urgent, please contact Vanja Tubin
> at v.tubin@uwinnipeg.ca or 204-988-7105.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <duff@goodorg.ca>; <dbaker@bakerlaw.ca>; "Tom.Mann"<Tom.Mann@gnb.ca>;
> ; "david"<david@fairwhistleblower.ca>;
> "allan.cutler"
> < allan.cutler@canadians4accountability.org>; <d.peachey@uwinnipeg.ca>;
> "Dion.Mario"<Dion.Mario@psic-ispc.gc.ca>; "toewsv1"<toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>
> Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "Gilles.Blinn"
> < Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; <info@lift.to>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 6:50 PM
> Subject: I just called AGAIN
>
>
> http://democracywatch.ca/biographies/
>
> Duff Conacher, LL.B.
> Director, GoodOrg.ca Consulting
> 416-546-3443
> duff@goodorg.ca
>
> David Baker B.A., LL.B., LL.M., L.S.M.
> email: dbaker@bakerlaw.ca
> phone: 416 533-0040, ext. 222
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <WMalley@perkinscoie.com>
> Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "Fred.Wyshak"
> < Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov>; "bob.paulson"<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:43 PM
> Subject: I just called Mr Malley
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: "justicedonedirtcheap.7777newdposts"
> < justicedonedirtcheap.7777newdposts@blogger.com>
> Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2013 5:34 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Re Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about
> Presidential enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch Industries???
> If anyone should know about such things it is Olson after all he assisted
> Ashcroft and Bush against me
>
>
> From: Elizabeth May <leader@greenparty.ca>
> Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 13:28:01 -0700
> Subject: Thank you for your message / Merci pour votre courriel Re: Re
> Teddy Baby Olson was on Fox News today yapping about Presidential
> enemies list as he represents the crooks in Koch Industries??? If
> anyone should know about such things it is Olson after all he assisted
> Ashcroft and Bush against me
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for your email. We will work to ensure that a response is
> sent to you as soon as possible.
>
> For invitations or meeting requests, please email ea@greenparty.ca.
> For media inquiries, please email media@greenparty.ca.
>
> Nous vous remercions d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. Nous ne
> ménagerons aucun effort pour vous transmettre notre réponse dans les
> meilleurs délais.
>
> Leader's Office Correspondence Team
> Équipe de correspondance du Bureau de la chef
>
> --
> Green Party of Canada
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *TIGTA Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman
> < WhistleblowerProtection@tigta.treas.gov>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:37:08 +0000
> Subject: RE: Hey Paul Samyn Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 I
> wonder after January 11th if the fancy dudes over in the UK or way
> down under will continue to ignore me as well??? After we share the
> same Queen N'esy Pas Stevey Boy harper?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Good morning,
>
> We have received your e-mail to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
> Administration (TIGTA) Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman.  This
> e-mail account and TIGTA’s Ombudsmen are available to Internal Revenue
> Service (IRS) employees and applicants as well as contractors who have
> been subjected to retaliation as a result of engaging in
> whistleblowing activities (i.e., efforts on your part to report fraud,
> waste, and abuse).  Based upon the information in your e-mail, it does
> not appear that your inquiry falls within these parameters.
>
> Thank you.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 6:23 PM
> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca; george.osborne.mp;
> J.Key@ministers.govt.nz; SpeakersOffice3@parliament.govt.nz;
> Andrew.Robb.MP@aph.gov.au; George.Soros; stephen.harper.a1;
> elizabeth.may; David.Coon; gopublic; whistle; washington field; *TIGTA
> Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman; whistleblower; Whistleblower;
> crof@shaw.ca; justin.ling; editor@thetyee.ca; Karine Fortin;
> carolyn.bennett; Doug@dougeyolfson.ca; doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca;
> fpcity@freepress.mb.ca; w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca; Paul.Lynch;
> Marianne.Ryan; sunrayzulu; dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca; john.green; chiefape;
> Catherine.Harrop@cbc.ca; redmond.shannon; Joe Friday;
> loyalistlaw@gmail.com; steve.roberge; robert.stoney; Leanne.Fitch;
> tj@burkelaw.ca; lou.lafleur; jeddy@coxandpalmer.com; oldmaison; andre;
> greg.byrne; paulzed@zed.ca; smay@coxandpalmer.com; nbpc
> Cc: David Amos; Greta.Bossenmaier; Jonathan.Vance; jon.gerrard
> Subject: Hey Paul Samyn Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 I wonder
> after January 11th if the fancy dudes over in the UK or way down under
> will continue to ignore me as well??? After we share the same Queen
> N'esy Pas Stevey Boy harper?
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:44:28 -0400
> Subject: Well at least Paul Samyn of the Free Press has finally
> admitted what the Free Press in Louis Riel's old stomping gronds has
> been ignoring for 11 years EH Justin Trudeau
> To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> < justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
> "carolyn.bennett"<carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
> "Marianne.Ryan"<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, sunrayzulu
> < sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
> "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
> < gopublic@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, radical
> < radical@radicalpress.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
> andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Samyn,Paul"<Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca>
> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 23:40:17 +0000
> Subject: RE: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP,
> their new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence
> etc cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85
> now CORRECT G$?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David;
>
> We are in receipt of your emails as well as your voice mail messages.
> At this point, we will not be following up on this story.
> Paul
>
> Paul Samyn  | Editor
>
> 204.697.7234  | 1355 Mountain Ave.  |  R2X 3B6
> winnipegfreepress.com  |  @paulsamyn
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Robert Stoney <loyalistlawoffice@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Tue, 05 01 2016 05:05:12
> Subject: Auto Response: Hey TJ Burke and Louie lafleur January 11th is
> coming fast Ya can't say that your buddies and the Police Commission
> ain't mentioned bigtime in my complaint N'esy Pas Stevey Boy Roberge?
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> I am currently experiencing difficulties with the following email accounts:
>
> robertstoney@yahoo.ca
>
> loyalistlawoffice@yahoo.ca
>
> If you have sent a message to either of these accounts, please re-send
> that message to:
>
> loyalistlaw@gmail.com
>
> Also, please update my contact information to reflect
> loyalistlaw@gmail.com as my primary email address, effective
> immediately.
>
> Thank you for your patience.
>
> //RMS//
>
> Robert Stoney
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Robb, Andrew (MP)"<Andrew.Robb.MP@aph.gov.au>
> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 12:27:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Nasty Trolls on the Internet & TPP So
> Prime Minister John Key and Minister Andrew Robb Should the FIVE EYES
> do their jobs for the benefit of the common man instead of messing
> with for yours N'esy Pas Justin Trudeau???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for taking the time to contact me.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply so that you know that your
> email has arrived.
>
> As you will appreciate given the large number of emails received each
> day, a reply cannot be sent immediately, nor can a reply be sent to
> every email received.
>
> I will however read your correspondence.
>
> I prioritise emails from my constituents and those relating to my
> trade, investment and tourism portfolio.
>
> If your email relates to my responsibilities as Minister for Trade and
> Investment, I will consider your correspondence and respond if
> appropriate.
>
> If your email is part of an automatically generated campaign, I will
> note your views.
>
> For those interested, there is a significant amount of useful facts
> regarding the China FTA and Trans Pacific Partnership on my
> Department’s website:
>
> http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/chafta/Pages/australia-china-fta.aspx
>
> and
>
> http://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/tpp/Pages/trans-pacific-partnership-agreement-tpp.aspx
>
>
> In the meantime, you may be interested in completing my community
> survey by clicking
> here<http://www.andrewrobb.com.au/Goldstein/OnlineSurvey.aspx>. You
> may also be interested in visiting my
> website<http://www.andrewrobb.com.au/>,
> Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/AndrewRobbMP>,
> Twitter<https://twitter.com/andrewrobbmp>, or
> YouTube<https://www.youtube.com/user/AndrewRobbMP> pages.
>
> Yours sincerely,
> ANDREW ROBB
> Minister for Trade & Investment
> Federal Member for Goldstein
>
> E: andrew.robb.mp@aph.gov.au<mailto:andrew.robb.mp@aph.gov.au>
>
> Electorate Office
> 368 Centre Road, Bentleigh VIC 3204
> P  03 9557 4644   F  03 9557 2906
>
> Parliament House
> Suite M1-22
> Parliament House
> Canberra ACT 2600
> P (02) 6277 7420   F (02) 6273 4128
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Speakers Office <SpeakersOffice3@parliament.govt.nz>
> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 22:18:52 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Trust that I don't mind being wrong about
> the choice of Speaker after listening to the Senate reform plans I say
> WOW just like Geoff Regan did when he commented that he was the first
> Speaker from the Maritimes in nearly 100 years
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> On behalf of Rt Hon David Carter, Speaker of the House of
> Representatives, thank you for your email.
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write and please be assured that your
> comments will be read by Mr Speaker. However, there may be no further
> response to you.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Office of the Speaker
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "J Key (MIN)"<J.Key@ministers.govt.nz>
> Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2016 12:28:12 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for your email
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> On behalf of the Prime Minister, Rt Hon John Key, thank you for your email.
>
> Please note that although email increases the speed of delivery, it
> may not be possible to provide you with the rapid response users of
> email may anticipate.
>
> The fact that you have taken the time to write is appreciated.  You
> can be assured that your views will be noted.
>
>
> Yours sincerely
> The Office of the Prime Minister
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Francis - WordPress.com"<court-orders@wordpress.com>
> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 17:57:43 -0800
> Subject: [#2468707]: Your recent message to WordPress.com
> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
>
>> Feel free to scroll down until your conscience bothers you.
>>
>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/
>> [...]
>
> Hi David,
>
> The site in question has been removed from WordPress.com for violating
> our Terms of Service.
>
> Francis
> Community Guardian
> WordPress.com | Automattic
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 15:51:51 -0700
> Subject: Re: [#2468707]: Phone message from +19028000369 and your
> client Barry Winters' malevolent WordPress blog
> To: court-orders@wordpress.com, "washington.field"
> < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "gilles.moreau"
> < gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
> < Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
> < martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
> < justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "justmin@gov.ns.ca"
> < justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "rod.knecht"<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>,
> pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, Glen Canning
> < grcanning@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Barry Winters
> < sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
>
> Thanks for responding to my calls
>
> Here ya go. Feel free to scroll down until your conscience bothers you.
>
> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/
>
> You client is Barry Winters of Edmonton Alberta and his email address
> can be found in the Cc line of this email
>
> Perhaps you should confer with your lawyers. Obviously I sent the
> emails l directly to them one year apart and received no response.
> Scroll past your message to me and you will see my latest email to you
> people in its entirety.
>
> Trust that my family and I will sue your company in the USA someday.
> However i have every right to sue WordPress in Canada first
>
> FYI My family still lives in the Boston area and you people have been
> publishing libel, sexual harassment and death threats against them for
> way past too long. Trust that I saved every word.of this evil website
> of yours.
>
> Clearly both the FBI and the RCMP got the same email as well. I am not
> joking about this.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> On 12/28/15, Sal P. - WordPress.com <court-orders@wordpress.com> wrote:
>> Hi there David,
>>
>> Thanks for getting in touch.
>>
>> I'm not seeng any previous emails from the address you're currently
>> writing
>> from, but perhaps you used a different address in the message you
>> mentioned
>> sending last year?
>>
>> If you have a complaint about a WordPress.com blog, please provide
>> further
>> information. In order to correctly review an abuse report we need the
>> following info:
>>
>> * The complete and exact URL of the post, page, or comment content being
>> reported.
>> * Direct quotations or citations of text or other material appearing at
>> the
>> above URL.
>> * Explanation as to why the above content is being reported as a
>> violation
>> of our Terms of Service, and specifically, which term said content is
>> violating.
>>
>> Once we have all of the above information, we can proceed with reviewing
>> your complaint.
>>
>> If you have legal process you'd like to send us, you can attach it in a
>> reply to this message. Keep in mind that WordPress.com is located in the
>> United States. Per our policies, we will respond only in compliance with
>> US
>> law and in reply to valid US-issued legal process or orders.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Sal P. | Community Guardian | WordPress.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and
> the NDP to ignore me as well???
> To: Liberal / Assistance <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm
> < pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, mcu
> < mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc?
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 16:57:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: WELL A COUPLE ETHICAL COMPUTERS AFFIRMED YOUR RECEIPT OF
> BARRY WINTERS LATEST PUBLISHED DEATH THREAT AGAINST ME WITHIN WORDRESS
> AS THE MINDLESS ZIONIST CELEBRATES THE BIRTH OF A MAN HE LOVES TO HATE
> To: press@eff.org, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
> < Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, justmin
> < justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "david.fraser"<david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>,
> andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, andrewjdouglas
> < andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: EFF Press <press@eff.org>
> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:56:10 -0800
> Subject: Out of Office
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello. EFF offices are closed through January 4. We may be able to
> answer some urgent requests, but please note: we may not be able to
> get back to you as much of the staff is traveling. Thank you and see
> you on January 4.
>
> On 12/25/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Cindy Cohn <cindy@eff.org>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:52:55 -0800
>> Subject: EFF is closed until January 4, 2016
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> EFF is closed until January 4, 2016.
>>
>> I will be periodically checking my email over the holiday, however. If
>> this is an emergency, please resend with URGENT in the subject line.
>>
>> For media requests, please email press@eff.org.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Cindy
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 16:52:44 -0400
>> Subject: WELL A COUPLE ETHICAL COMPUTERS AFFIRMED YOUR RECEIPT OF
>> BARRY WINTERS LATEST PUBLISHED DEATH THREAT AGAINST ME WITHIN WORDRESS
>> AS THE MINDLESS ZIONIST CELEBRATES THE BIRTH OF A MAN HE LOVES TO HATE
>> To: sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
>> < Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
>> premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "scott.mckeen"
>> < scott.mckeen@edmonton.ca>, "don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>,
>> Cindy Bruneau <Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, teddyspalace@gmail.com,
>> customercare.other@hudsonsbay.com,
>> marks.customer.service@canadiantire.ca, jacob.glick@rci.rogers.com,
>> DDrummond <DDrummond@google.com>, abusecomplaints@markmonitor.com,
>> levi.heath@btlaw.com, jonathan.boustani@btlaw.com, mcu
>> < mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
>> < justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, cindy
>> < cindy@eff.org>, grosloff@durietangri.com, jeff@lakeshorelaw.org,
>> jgratz@durietangri.com, sagnolucci@kvn.com, axr@kvn.com,
>> dmcgowan@durietangri.com, ddurie@durietangri.com, patrick_doran1
>> < patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
>> "rodney.wadden"<rodney.wadden@fredericton.ca>, "rod.knecht"
>> < rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
>> < martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
>> < Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
>> < Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul.Collister"
>> < Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "mark.vespucci"
>> < mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "trudeau.j"<trudeau.j@parl.gc.ca>, john
>> graham <john.graham@safeway.com>, bruce bowman
>> < bruce.bowman@sobeys.com>, karin mccaskill
>> < karin.mccaskill@sobeys.com>, press@automattic.com, gopublic
>> < gopublic@cbc.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, oldmaison
>> < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, newsonline
>> < newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, news
>> < news@dailygleaner.com>, news <news@hilltimes.com>, news
>> < news@kingscorecord.com>, "mclaughlin.heather"
>> < mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>, radical
>> < radical@radicalpress.com>, paul <paul@paulfromm.com>,
>> business.ethics@safeway.com, tpandos@bentallkennedy.com,
>> customerservice@bestbuycanada.ca, echun@bestbuycanada.ca,
>> "ed.pilkington"<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, "Jacques.Poitras"
>> < Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, lois
>> < lois@loisjoysheplawy.com>, bluelightning 03
>> < bluelightning_03@hotmail.com>
>>
>> I DOUBLE DOG DARE ANYONE WITH EVEN AN INKLING OF ETHICS OR EMPATHY TO
>> SCROLL THROUGH BARRY WINTERS EVIL BLOG AND TRY NOT TO BE OFFENDED
>>
>> HERE IS ANOTHER DEATH THREAT JUST TO RUB IT IN
>>
>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/06/david-amos-and-the-kiddies-get-what-they-deserve/
>>
>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/20/naked-barry-the-beautiful-edmonton-police-detective-and-fucked-up-david-amos-2/
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Cindy Bruneau <cindy.bruneau@edmonton.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:39:22 -0800
>> Subject: Out of Office Re: Fwd: Perhaps you and the RCMP should review
>> these voicemails the documents and emails within the old pdf files
>> hereto attached before you quit N'esy Pas Mario Dion?
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> I am away from the office and will return on Tuesday December 29
>> 2015. If your matter is time sensitive please contact Corporate
>> Security Monitoring and dispatch centre at 780-496-8888, and ask to
>> speak to the Advisor on call.
>>
>> I will respond to your email when I return.
>>
>> Have a great day!
>> --
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Cindy Bruneau, CPP
>> Corporate Security Advisor
>> Law Branch
>> Corporate Services
>> 780-496-5156
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> “Corporate Security’s mission is to mitigate risks to
>>
>> corporate assets and to contribute to the improved
>>
>> livability of employees and the citizens of Edmonton”
>>
>> To report a security incident:
>>
>> Click here
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Genevieve Rosloff <GRosloff@durietangri.com>
>> Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:39:29 -0800
>> Subject: Out of Office: Perhaps you and the RCMP should review these
>> voicemails the documents and emails within the old pdf files hereto
>> attached before you quit N'esy Pas Mario Dion?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Genevieve Rosloff is no longer with Durie Tangri LLP. Please call
>> 415-362-6666 if you need assistance.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/25/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Merry Xmass Mr Baconfat
>>>
>>> Here is one Hell of an email even if I do say so myself
>>>
>>> Please enjoy like you did the last one after you teased me about my
>>> Twitter account
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/07/little-david-amos-crying-and-whining-on-twitter/
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/08/little-david-amos-is-crying-again-3/
>>>
>>> You mentioned a lot of people and businesses in your Xmass blog so I
>>> took the liberty of informing them I read your comments about them as
>>> you sanction my demise again. I also included some old emails to many
>>> other people who know very well by now.
>>>
>>> Trust that I will sue someday soon just as you have begged me to do
>>> for many years. In the "Mean" time say Hoka Hey for me the RCMP, the
>>> EPS and to your racist family such as your evil Mother, Lori and
>>> Austin Ink and their  "Outlaws". as well. Need I say shame on you all?
>>> You know that I ain't one bit religious but but at least I am not wo
>>> faced. Why in Hell do you Zionist oxymorons celebrate Christmas while
>>> puting down Christ all the god damned time?
>>>
>>> I must also ask why does your daughter Keltie Winters and her cohorts
>>> in the Today Centre abide with what you publish about many people and
>>> her family in particular?
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> P.S. Glen Canning and the lawyers who represent WordPress and Sobeys
>>> etc really should study this entire email rather closely this time.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/22/its-christmas-in-the-city-pure-hell-with-the-outlaws-and-death-to-david-amos/
>>>
>>> “Its Christmas in the City,” Pure Hell with the Outlaws, and Death to
>>> David Amos!
>>> by baconfatreport on December 22, 2015
>>>
>>> Dead Rehtaeh Parsons…She wasn’t raped but she really liked to fuck her
>>> best friend’s boyfriends. Happy Christmas Glen and Leah.
>>>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 12/13/15, YouTube <noreply@youtube.com> wrote:
>
>> From: YouTube <noreply@youtube.com>
>> Subject: New activity on your video: Trudeau The Younger and CBCs mandate
>> To: David Amos
>> Date: Sunday, December 13, 2015, 10:09 PM
>> New
>> comment on your video
>> Trudeau
>> The Younger and CBCs
>> mandate+Tanker Malley As amusing as
>> that is that has nothing to do with it. I can't remember
>> if that guy threatened Amos like he did the school. I think
>> he just made references to risque posts his
>> daughterReplyView
>> all
>> commentsYouTube
>> comments are powered by Google+Learn
>> moreUnsubscribe
>> from these emails.
>>
>> Google Inc., 1600 Amphitheatre Pkwy, Mountain View, CA 94043
>> USA
>
>
> On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> wrote:
>> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the event
>> that
>> you were inclined to do so.)
>>
>> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Craig Munroe
>> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
>> To: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm
>> < pm@pm.gc.ca>; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>;
>> bdysart
>> < bdysart@smss.com>; bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>;
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com;
>> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
>> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; assistance@liberal.ca;
>> Karine
>> Fortin <info@ndp.ca>; stephen.harper <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
>> Trust
>> that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore I am
>> before
>> the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>>
>> On 1/6/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>>> BCC line
>>>
>>> Dr. John Gillis
>>> P.O. Box 723
>>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>>> Canada B3J 2T3
>>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>>
>>> John Allan, President
>>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>>> T: (709) 685-1230
>>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Braeden Caley
>>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>>>   604-809-9951
>>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>>
>>>
>>> Britt Dysart QC
>>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>>> 77 Westmorland Street
>>> P.O. Box 730
>>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>>> E3B 5B4
>>>
>>> P 506.443.0153
>>> F 506.443.9948
>>>
>>>
>>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Ewan W. Clark
>>> Montague
>>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>>
>>> Robert M. Schuett
>>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.liberal.ca/national-board-of-directors/
>>>
>>> Who are we?
>>>
>>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>>> Anna Gainey
>>>
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>>
>>> T @annamgainey
>>> Leader        Justin Trudeau
>>> National President    Anna Gainey
>>> Acting National Director      Christina Topp
>>> National Vice-President (English)     Chris MacInnes
>>> National Vice-President (French)      Marie Tremblay
>>> National Policy Chair         Maryanne Kampouris
>>> National Membership Secretary         Leanne Bourassa
>>> Past National President       Mike Crawley
>>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador   John Allan
>>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island      Ewan Clark
>>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party  John Gillis
>>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association  Britt Dysart
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec)   Linda Julien
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario)  Tyler Banham
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba)         Sachit Mehra
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)     Evatt Merchant
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta)  Robbie Schuett
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)         Braeden
>>> Caley
>>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon       Blake Rogers
>>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories)    Rosanna
>>> Nicol
>>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut     Michel Potvin
>>> Caucus Representative         Francis Scarpaleggia
>>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female)     Caitlin Tolley
>>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male)       Kevin Seesequasis
>>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission        Carlene Variyan
>>> President, Young Liberals of Canada   Justin Kaiser
>>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French)        Anne Adams
>>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English)       Kenneth D.
>>> Halliday
>>> Chair, Council of Presidents  Veena Bhullar
>>> Chief Financial Officer       Chuck Rifici
>>> Chief Revenue Officer         Stephen Bronfman
>>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada         Mike Eizenga
>>> National Campaign Co-Chair    Katie Telford
>>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English)    Craig Munroe
>>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French)     Elise Bartlett
>>>
>>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>>> CORRECT G$?
>>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>>> < carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca...

[Message clipped]  View entire message

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies



David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others


Methinks the clowns Trump and Scheer and lots of folks know if they can smell Trudeau The Younger's bullshit or his buddy Gerald Butts" farts through a mask then its not gonna stop the virus either N'esy Pas?


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/andrew-scheer-spotted-without-mask-at.html



#nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkx8_y7iK24

Air Canada Refused Boarding to this Woman Because She Wouldn't Wear a Mask

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZZ73Or9HfKE&t=2732s

Norman Traversy & the private prosecution of Justin Trudeau

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/andrew-scheer-pearson-airport-no-mask-1.5640979

Andrew Scheer spotted without a mask at Toronto's Pearson Airport

The airport's rules say all passengers and employees must wear a mask 'at all times'

David Cochrane, John Paul Tasker· CBC News· Posted: Jul 07, 2020 4:47 PM ET



Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer, centre, is seen at Toronto's Pearson Airport without a mask on while waiting for a flight to Ottawa. (@baleener/Twitter)


Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer was seen at a departure gate at Toronto's Pearson Airport Tuesday without a mask on — an apparent contravention of the rules that apply to all travellers passing through the terminal.

The airport's website stipulates that "all passengers and airport employees" must wear a mask or a face covering "at all times." The mandatory mask rule has been in place since June 1 to stop the spread of COVID-19 among the travelling public.

"This includes the pre- and post-security screening areas of the terminals, parking facilities, people mover train, sidewalks/curbs outside the terminals and other outdoor public areas," the airport rules say.

There are exceptions for people under the age of two, travellers who are unable to remove a face covering without assistance and for people who have trouble breathing. Masks are not required for travellers dining at food and beverage locations.



Social media users posted pictures of Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer at Toronto's Pearson Airport Tuesday. (@canadiandollaz/Twitter)


A number of pictures surfaced on social media Tuesday of Scheer speaking to Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister and others while waiting to board a flight. Pallister also appears to have his mask off while speaking to Scheer in the terminal.

A spokesperson for Scheer confirmed to CBC News that the pictures of Scheer were taken Tuesday.

"Mr. Scheer wore a face mask while travelling to Ottawa [Tuesday]. He removed it to make a phone call. This picture must have been taken before he put it back on," said Kelsie Chiasson, acting director of communications for Scheer.

The pictures do not appear to show Scheer talking on the phone.

WATCH | Scheer is asked why he didn't wear a mask at Pearson airport:



Federal Opposition Leader Andrew Scheer spoke with reporters the day after he was photographed speaking with Manitoba's Premier and three other men at Pearson airport. None were wearing masks even though the airport requires passengers to wear them. 2:17


On Wednesday, Scheer said he had nothing more to add and called repeated questions about the incident "ridiculous."

"It was pretty self-explanatory yesterday," he said when pressed by reporters.

"It's hard to believe this is actually your question and your followup when we're dealing with a prime minister that is under an investigation for ethics violations for the third time.

"We're dealing with $300 billion worth of deficit with no recovery plan, with no budget this year, and you want to know how long I had my mask off yesterday after making a phone call? Come on, that's ridiculous."

Premier Pallister told CBC News his maskless moment was a lapse in judgment.

"I lifted my mask to join some friends in conversation at the Toronto airport this afternoon," he said in an emailed statement. "It was an error on my part, it won't happen again."

Social media users asked Pearson's Twitter account if masks were still required after the Scheer pictures surfaced.

"They are! All travelers and employees inside the terminal must wear a mask or face covering," the airport's account said in response.






CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies



David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others


Methinks Higgy et al should enjoy a little Deja Vu as they consider a snap election while their favourite welfare bum Chucky Leblanc plays the victim card again N'esy Pas?


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/new-brunswick-premier-wont-rule-out.html



#nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkMglZ6i5FY





https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/election-talk-heats-up-new-brunswick-1.5635871

New Brunswick premier won't rule out snap election call

Premier Blaine Higgs has said he hasn't made a decision about going to the polls sooner rather than later

Jordan Gill· CBC News· Posted: Jul 02, 2020 9:17 PM AT |



Premier Higgs hasn't ruled out an early election, but none of the other parties seem keen on the idea. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

New Brunswick's political parties seem to have mixed views on the possibility of a snap election in the coming months.

The province has had a minority government for 19 months, which traditionally would be considered getting long in the tooth.

But COVID-19 has made the premise of holding any mass gathering, like voting, potentially hazardous.

In an interview on Information Morning Fredericton last Friday, Premier Blaine Higgs wouldn't rule out holding an election sooner rather than later.
"I haven't made a decision on that at this point," Higgs said.

Under the province's fixed-election date act, the government does not have to hold an election until October 2022

Few expect the minority government to last that long and the province does need to hold at least two byelections soon, with a third seat possibly opening up in the fall.

"My ability to stay in office is really at the desire of those who are supporting me in the opposition parties because I don't have numbers by myself to do so," said Higgs.

"That obviously plays a role in the decision as well. So there's a number of factors."

Opposition reacts

For his part Liberal Leader Kevin Vickers said he does not want an election this year and said his party would not force an election in 2020. It's a drastic shift from earlier this year when he swore to help bring down the government.

"No one's eyes should be on an election right now," Vickers said in an interview Thursday. "This is the last thing this province needs."


Liberal Leader Kevin Vickers says his party won't force an election in 2020. (CBC)

VIckers said he believes the two byelections should be held, and that Elections New Brunswck should use those as test cases for how to proceed is a general election is required later in the pandemic.

Green Party Leader David Coon also said this isn't the right time for an election and he would be surprised if Higgs chose to go that route.

"The people of the province I don't think have any appetite for an election during a pandemic," he said. 


Green Party Leader David Coon said New Brunswickers don't want to go to the polls. (CBC)

"They want us to focus on keeping them safe and secure and healthy,"

In an email to CBC News a spokesperson for the People's Alliance said while leader Kris Austin did not think New Brunswickers want an election, if one is called, his caucus will be ready.

Uncharted waters

J.P. Lewis, a political scientist at University of New Brunswick Saint John, said the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and a lack of polling data make it difficult to determine what the governing Progressive Conservatives are likely to do, or if it's a good idea politically.

He said in normal circumstances he would say the likelihood of a snap election would be high, but these aren't normal circumstances.

"If we didn't have a pandemic I would say the odds are really good, if we were waging on this I would say I'll take that we're going to have an election," said Lewis.


Normally J.P. Lewis, a political scientist at the University of New Brunswick Saint John, would bet on an election happening now, but given COVID-19 there's too many unknowns to make a prediction (Graham Thompson/CBC)

"But just because of the situation we're in I think they almost need to wait and maybe the party will do a poll to figure that out because I think that's what they need to know."

Lewis said the fact the Liberals have said they wouldn't force an election makes it more difficult for the Tories to justify one to the public.

"If [the Liberals] had said, 'you know we're ready to go,' then if we have a general election anytime soon and it's unpopular you could say 'well the Liberals wanted this as well," said Lewis.
"Now [Higgs] is boxed in … if he decides to go it's his decision."

But a lot of that is predicated on the province's appetite for a vote, which Lewis said we really don't understand because not enough polling has been done on the subject.

"[For] someone who doesn't follow politics that closely if their next question is 'well do we have to have one?' And the answer is 'no.' Then they could say 'well why would we? Why don't we just keep trying to solve what's going on,'" said Lewis.




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 00:58:23 -0300
Subject: YO Blaine Higgs Merhinks Mary Wilson should certainly remember me
even though she may have no clue as to who Mr. Oickle is N'esy Pas?
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>
"Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>,
Cc: premier <premier@gnb.ca>, Carole.Caron2@gnb.ca,
 "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Mike Therien <therien.mike@brunswicknews.com>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
"jake.stewart"<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, mdcohen212@gmail.com
> or by phone at
506-357-1177.

Thank you again for your email.

----------------------------

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
Carole à mon bureau de circonscription à Oromocto à
Carole.Caron2@gnb.caCarole.Caron@gnb.ca> ou par téléphone au
506-357-1177.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.


Anybody notice tha Chucky posted two comments and deleted one within
his pwn Youtube after I sent the email toyou all that Wilson's
computer acknowledged???


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkMglZ6i5FY

Lunatic James Oickle from Fredericton goes after Blogger on a peaceful

Saturday morning!!!

425 views
•Jul 11, 2020
Charles Leblanc
1.8K subscribers
Lunatic James Oickle from Fredericton goes after Blogger on a peaceful
Saturday morning!!!

3 Comments

Charles Leblanc
1 hour ago
He came after me AGAIN tonight....told him to take a swing at me but
he wouldn't...I think I'm going to the cops this week to have them
sign papers that the citizens can take the law into their own
hands.......

Charles Leblanc
1 hour ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAx2sVQ2UfA&t=2s

Blogger will NOT remove video of confrontation with James Oickle. Why

Fredericton Police are silent?

263 views
•Jul 12, 2020
Charles Leblanc



Go Figure why Chucky Crybaby Leblanc seldom uses this blog anymore

http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2008/02/from-top-of-world-to-scum-of-earth-in.html

Charles LeBlanc Political ADHD Activist

Sunday, February 24, 2008

FROM THE TOP OF THE WORLD TO THE SCUM OF THE EARTH IN A MATTER OF MONTHS!!!!

citymotel
Originally uploaded by Oldmaison

00031


Last week, I was approached by someone with an interesting story.

It's a tale of a guy who was on top of the world but came down pretty hard.

He used to be the owner of the City Motel in Fredericton.


00034


His name is Jim.

Jim was doing ok until his whole world came crashing down. I mean REALLY DOWN!!!

Until his downfall, he used to mingle with the higher ups of society.

He leased the City Motel for 10 years. I might add that he also owned
the Lobster Hut which was attached to the Motel.

Many politicians would stay over night in that building. Ohhhhh???? If
walls could talk??? But Jim sure can!!!!

Jim took his business very seriously!

He told me that if he was still the owner of the Motel and he would
have seen this blogger in the building? He would have asked me to
leave the area. I wouldn't even be allowed in the parking lot. Only if
I was invited to the motel by the politicians in advance.

He made certain the MLA'S had privacy from the media.

Speaking of privacy? He went so far as building this back door so they
could maintain their privacy.


0004000038


A meeting was arranged and I met with Jim.

He told me some very interesting tales raging from the politicians to
the way the Fredericton Police Force handled his case.

Especially the story he told the Government that he would go public
with some stories he seen in his motel?

The Government quickly reacted. It was sort of like my case of telling
our elected officials that I would go public with the murder? < This
is the only reason I was told that I was banned from the Legislature >

The Liberals quickly told me that they would haul me in court for Harassment!!!

I explained to Jim I was a blogger and anyone can become a journalist
by writing their story and I'll blog it.

Too bad my recorder is broken because I would have just interviewed
the guy. So we have to do it the hard way.

The interesting issue on this one? It was a Civil matter and the media
still managed to put the story on the front page.


motel1


Also added was the Fredericton Police Force supervised the eviction.

What's with this????

Once this hit the front page? Jim’s life began his downward spiral.

Jim was the type of guy who was involved in all kinds of political
events and he had a Carte Blanche to visit the P.C’S in their building
but all this came to a sudden halt once he was told - In the future,
he would have to make an appointment.

Jim didn't like the way he was treated so he threaten to go public
with his stories of going ons in his Motel.



00041


Well, he ended up in a mental ward for three months because of other issues.

Well? After chatting with the guy, he didn't look coo coo to me?

He sounded very sincere with his emotional stories.

I'll be blogging the tales during the next few weeks.



jim


Stay tuned....

P.S. I hope I'm not shot on the streets because of this one?

Truly stay tuned....

Posted by Blogger Charles LeBlanc at 7:54 PM


8 comments:

Anonymous said...
    I know Jim Oickle and have always thought of him as an honest and
sincere person. What happened to him was wrong wrong wrong, from the
way he was treated by the owners of the City Motel / Lobster Hut who
stole his business to him being thrown in the Restigouche Institution
in Campbellton because he wouldn't take the crap from anyone anymore.
It's amazing what can happen when you start to threaten the
establishment with their dirty little secrets. It's about time Jim's
story was told. He has suffered so much, I think that this might help
him by getting it off his shoulders. I bet a few people aren't going
to be happy about it though... his enemies will be out with their
knives soon enough...be brave Jim!
    11:39 AM

Anonymous said...
    Don't worry.
    There will be no stories told.

    Same as ,there were no stories by the hundreds in the know bout
kingsclear ,hatfield,mckenna,et all.
    12:01 PM

Anonymous said...
    Hey Charles, I'm not sure if you have done a story on this but the
Woolastook Park situation with Fred (Paget) and him losing it under
"interesting circumstances". With camping season on the way, it will
be interesting.
    By the way, I think he did a great job. the park was closed when
the Gov't owned it because they couldn't maintain it now he has put
his life savings into it, they want it back - ridiculous!
    1:55 PM

Anonymous said...
    charles,
    i am glad you wrote a story about jim. i used to work in that
building for both the lobster hut and the motel and loved every minute
of it.

    it's a shame, because the city motel and lobster hut was a good
place to go and i was actually proud to say that i worked there
instead of mcdonalds like everyone else my age, at the time.

    i was there the day the cops all showed up at the motel. i went to
the front desk and asked what was going on and my supervisor told me
to go home. whoever took over the motel stopped giving me hours and
wouldn't give me a reason as to why they stopped scheduling me.
instead they said "we'll call you when we need you back", i figured i
would wait a bit, and i never got that call back. i was 19, living on
my own, paying my own bills and groceries and they didn't even care. i
had to move back home and to this day, i will not step foot into that
hotel or suggest anyone go there, because it isn't the same.

    they ruined the look of the city motel and its not as inviting as
it used to be when jim was running it. its quite a shame, really, and
a stupid move on their part because now, all you see is an empty
parking lot.

    i am happy to hear he is still kicking around.
    4:51 PM

Anonymous said...
    Now you've got my curiousity up. What happened at the City Motel /
Lobter Hut anyways? I remember seeing it in the paper, looked like a
big scam on the part of the owners to me. Wait until he's just about
to take over the lease and steal it from him. We never did hear Jim's
side of the story about how those creeps took his business away from
him. I used to like the way it looked too, it had character. I think
they even used to promote it on the tourism brochures because it was
so interesting. Now it looks like any old place on the side of a
highway. BORING. The empty parking lot tells it all. Didn't take them
long to ruin a good business.
    5:55 PM

jimoicke@hotmail.com said...
    Charles I'm writing this comment to see if you get comments posted
on stories this old. If so I think its time we tell the rest of the
story.
    I will answer any questions your readers wish to put to me in
regards to what they have heard about me. I promise to tell only the
truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
    You had a comment from a sister that I no longer see. Is it
possible to retrieve it?
    9:46 PM

Blogger Charles LeBlanc said...
    Nope...you told me to remove those stories...

    sorry...
    3:27 PM

James said...
    Good. Better that way, I'm sure an Anon will bring it up in
regards to another issue and I will deal with it then. Thanks for
taking it down when I asked. Love the Bedbug Story, this place needed
to be looked at back when I was in business 4 years ago. Keep up the
good work.
    1:41 PM







However you people should study the aforementioned email because
nobody can deny that the words of his old pal Mr Oickle can be found
text of a long deleted blog of Chucky Leblanc's Correct?


>
> Wednesday, April 07, 2010
>
> I support Fredericton Police Chief Barry MacKnight 100%!!!!
>
> During these past few months, there's lots of stories about battles
> between the Police Union and the Police Chief.
>
> The Union release a Poll among their members saying only 10% of the
> force supports their Chief.
>
> I first heard of problems a couple of years ago.
>
> I was surprise because the Cops are doing a fantastic job in keeping
> this City safe.
>
> Who's responsible for Fredericton to be a safe City?
>
> Our leaders at the top of the Fredericton Police Force?
>
> I would say - Yes!!
>
> I chatted with some Business owners during the past month and everyone
> is supporting the way the Cops are patrolling the Downtown area.
>
> They are walking the beat and clearing the troublemakers from the Downtown
> core.
>
> I have met Police Chief Barry MacKnight on a few occasion and found
> the Chief a nice pleasant gentlemen to chat with.
>
> I might add I was very surprise when he spoke Le Francais en Chiac!!!
>
> lol
>
> THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE NEED!!!
>
> lol
>
> The chief chiac was proven when he launched the new cruiser....
>
> Here's a blog I wrote on this issue -
>
> I'm happy they never went with the Black and White Cruiser they have
> in Bathurst!
>
> But it sure reminds you for a nice cold Canadian eh???
>
> lol
>
> What's a Emergencie??? We chiac Acadians say - Emergency!!..lol
>
> Urgence???
>
> SO? WHAT DO YOU THINK OF NEW COLORS???
>
> Myself, I didn't like the new colors and Mayor Brad Woodside agreed!!!
>
> Click below for video -
>
> But seriously??? Why are so many members of our Police Force upset
> with the Chief?
>
> Is he demanding too much from the Union Members?
>
> His contract is up for renewal in July and the local media are pushing
> the issue.
>
> This is the very first time there's a contract renewal with a Police Chief.
>
> In the past, former Police Chiefs were there for 20 years.
>
> Who will decide Barry MacKnight future?
>
> The Councilors at City Hall?
>
> Will this be an open meeting?
>
> Will the public have a say?
>
> I tried to get some answers but everyone is keeping their mouth shut
> on this issue.
>
> Lets say that we do get a new chief and crime goes up? Who will we
> blame? The new Police Chief?
>
> So what's the problem?
>
> I know for a fact many members of the Police Force reads this Blog.
> Maybe they can tell the readers what the problem is???
>
> Myself? I support the Police Chief 100% and I hope his contract is
> renewed for another 5 years!!!
>
> P.S. I'm not kissing ass!! I'm just calling it as it is!!!
> Posted by Charles LeBlanc at 8:55:00 AM
>
> 10 comments:
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     How mixed up is Charles? He hates the RCMP who have never
> arrrested him and loves the Fredericton Police who have.
>     11:14 AM, April 07, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Any complaints fabricated against the Fredericton Police are
> simply the quebec spreading organization trying to force french on
> everything by getting Fredericton policed by RCMP. But Moncton has had
> their fill!
>     11:22 AM, April 07, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Do police cars in Fredericton real have EMERGENCIE instead of
> URGENCE for the french portion on their police cars?! I have noticed
> that but if this is the case, it is simply unbelievable!! How can this
> have happened?
>     11:29 PM, April 07, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Hey Charles,Fredericton doesnt need 2 police forces,we have the
> R.C.M.P at the top of Regent street,the city force on Queen street. I
> think we should disband the chief and his car kicking bandits and
> replace mayor Woodside at the same time.Our chief hasnt the right to
> wear a badge or call himself a cop,he isnt anything more then a social
> worker
>     11:51 PM, April 07, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Exactly what a Police Officer needs to be, A Social Worker. An
> educated Social Worker. Not a bilingual shortcake!
>
>     7:42 AM, April 08, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     I agree, our police officers should be trained as social workers
> and counselors and not the thugs we have today.
>
>     Maybe throw in some non violent conflict resolution training as well.
>     10:32 AM, April 08, 2010
>
> jimoickle@hotmail.com said...
>
>     My view of both Chief and Deputy Chief remains the same. I will go
> on a lie detector with them both any time. Deputy Chiefs brother was
> involved with stealing all the assets in a Civil Case from a truck
> parked as requested by City Police Officers. I have tried to have
> charges laid only to have them make me out to be the criminal. The
> witnesses are many upstanding citizens yet I can't even get police to
> discuss. They are a joke and MacKnight is the biggest joke. You may
> think I'm crazy but ask Conrad Mead of CKTP, his 3 sons, Robb
> Hartland(Double B), my father Norman Oickle, Tony Mcfaggen, Peter
> Keith, and they will confirm that this theft occurred. They saw the
> evidence and the way the police harassed me when I tried to press
> charges. This theft was done with the help of numerous officers and
> can be proven. Ten minutes on a lie detector for the chief and I would
> settle it. I deserve at least that for all I did for my community
> before these protectors of the Law got involved. I will sign my name
> and assure you Charles the others I mention will confirm the handling
> of my case was Criminal.
>
>     12:24 AM, April 09, 2010
> jimoickle@hotmail.com said...
>
>     For the record...Up until this truck was broken into I never had a
> single problem with the City Police nor did I have a single thing on a
> Criminal Record over my 50 years as an upstanding citizen. I will put
> my record along side a few of the forces detectives any time. Lets
> fire up the Lie Detectors and then you will see some fired. Come on
> Barry you were the one who wanted all the newbie's on your force to
> take a Lie Detector Test. You and I can prove how well they work. If
> I'm wrong I pay all cost...if right give me back my eguipment and
> press charges against those who were paid to uphold the Law not twist
> it for their own purposes.
>     1:16 AM, April 09, 2010
>
> Magos said...
>
>     Lie detectors don't work.
>     10:12 AM, April 09, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Barry thinks they do as he is the one that stated in Daily Garbage
> he would like to see all new recruits have to take one before being
> accepted into his Farce. Charles the next time you see Barry you
> should get him on video answering you in regards to his feelings on
> Lie Detectors and wether they work or not.
>
>     2:29 PM, April 10, 2010
>
> Fredericton police chief steps down
> Barry MacKnight is retiring on July 1
> CBC News
> Posted: Jun 20, 2012 3:02 PM AT
>
> Related Stories
>
> RCMP takes over Charles LeBlanc arrest probe
>
> Woodside concerned over handling of blogger's arrest
>
> Fredericton blogger's arrest attack on civil liberties
>
>  Fredericton Police Chief Barry MacKnight says he was planning to
> retire in 2013, but decided to step down next month instead. (CBC)
> Fredericton Police Chief Barry MacKnight has announced that he will be
> stepping down on July 1.
>
> MacKnight, 49, said he was planning to retire in early 2013, but has
> come to an agreement with the city where the early retirement
> provisions of the contract will be honoured.
>
> "It was an opportunity that came up and I talked to the city
> administrator and the mayor and we came to an agreement, simple as
> that," he told CBC News Wednesday.
>
> “The time was right," MacKnight said earlier in a statement.
> "It is time for a change."
>
> MacKnight has been chief for seven years and on the force for 25 years.
> It's been "a satisfying run," he said in the statement, calling it an
> "honour" to work with so many professional police officers and a
> "privilege" to work with city council and staff.
> "I know I am leaving the city in the good hands of a very professional
> and dedicated police force, and I am proud of that," MacKnight said.
>
> 'I especially appreciate that he always worked with the city’s best
> interests at heart.'—Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside
>
> "I also want to thank the people of Fredericton for their support over
> my tenure."
> Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside says the process to choose a successor
> will be decided in the coming days after he discusses the matter with
> council and the chief administrative officer.
>
> MacKnight served the city well, Woodside said.
> "I especially appreciate that he always worked with the city’s best
> interests at heart and I wish him the very best in any future
> endeavours."
>
> On heels of blogger controversy
> MacKnight's retirement comes on the heels of difficulties between the
> force and controversial blogger Charles LeBlanc.
>
> LeBlanc, who faced charges of criminal libel earlier this year for
> allegedly damaging the reputation of a police officer on his website,
> was arrested at the legislature last month.
> Police said LeBlanc was arrested after a complaint of "assault by
> trespasser." LeBlanc has been banned from the legislature grounds
> since 2006.
>
> LeBlanc is scheduled to appear in court on June 25.
>
> The investigation has since been handed over to the RCMP.
>
> MacKnight, who plans to find another job, says his early departure
> from the force has nothing to do with LeBlanc's case.
>
> "It's an important issue, but we deal with important issues here every
> single day," he told CBC News. "It's what police officers do every day
> — they make very difficult decisions based on good faith and the
> information they have at the time.
>
> "I can't be any clearer about this," he said. "The past two months
> have been no harder than any few months I've ever been in this job.
> Yeah, this is a hard job, and somethimes the media is engaged in the
> issues we're dealing with and sometimes they're not."
>
> MacKnight said the investigation will continue with the city
> administrator. He declined to comment any further on the case.
>
> LeBlanc's arrest came just days after he and his lawyer called for a
> public inquiry into the Fredericton Police Force's handling of a raid
> at LeBlanc's home in January.
>
> LeBlanc, who writes a controversial blog that is often critical of
> police officers, politicians and the legislature's sergeant-at-arms,
> was accused of damaging the reputation of a city police officer in
> blog posts last summer.
>
> Police seized his computer and LeBlanc says he was told he would be
> facing charges of criminal libel.
>
> But on May 4, the provincial government announced it would not be
> proceeding with criminal libel charges against LeBlanc, saying that
> section of the Criminal Code has been deemed unconstitutional by other
> jurisdictions.
>
> From: "Mazerolle Stephens, Angela(JUS)"Angela.MazerolleStephens@gnb.ca
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:39:20 -0300
> Subject: RE: "I have to caution you, this is not a game." Karlheinz
> Schreiber
> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Mr. Amos:
>
> Receipt is acknowledged of the five pieces of e-mail you sent to me on
> May 14, 2009.
>
> Upon review, it is apparent that they do not relate to me either
> personally or professionally. Please note that your correspondence is
> unwanted and unwelcome.
>
> Please do not send me any more of your communications, as I find them
> harassing in nature.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Angela Mazerolle Stephens
> Superintendent of Pensions
> Office of the Superintendent of Pensions Department of Justice and
> Consumer Affairs
> Province of New Brunswick
> Frederick Square, Ste. 450
> 77 Westmorland Street
> P.O. Box 6000
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1
> Ph: (506) 453-2055
> Fax: (506) 457-7266
>
> E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE
> This e-mail and the information contained in it is confidential, may be
> privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the
> addressee(s). Any other person is strictly prohibited from using,
> disclosing, distributing or reproducing it. If you have received this
> communication in error, please reply by e-mail to the sender and delete
> or destroy all copies of this message.
>
> CLAUSE DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ POUR LES ENVOIS PAR COURRIEL
> Le présent courriel et les renseignements qu'il contient sont
> confidentiels, peuvent être protégés par le secret professionnel et
> sont à l'usage exclusif du (des) destinataire(s) susmentionné(s). Toute
> autre personne est par les présentes avisée qu'il lui est strictement
> interdit d'en faire l'utilisation, la diffusion, la distribution ou la
> reproduction. Si cette transmission vous est arrivée par erreur,
> veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par
> courriel, puis effacer ou détruire toutes les copies du présent
> message.
>

---------- Orignal message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 23:12:42 -0300
Subject: YO Blaine Higgs Merhinks you should enjoy a liitle Deja Vu as
you consider a snap election while your favourite welfare bum Chucky
Leblanc plays the victim card again N'esy Pas?
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "Kevin.Vickers"
<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>
Cc: premier <premier@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca>,
"David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
>.  Thank you!
>
> *************************************
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre  courriel sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> media-medias@gnb.camedia-medias@gnb.ca>.  Merci!
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dominic Cardy <dcardy@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:23:13 -0300
> Subject: Re: Whereas Chucky Leblanc is going down memory lane with
> Blaine Higgs tonight Methinks Dominic Cardy and his buddy Kelly Lamrock
> should remind their boss of a few things N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David,
>
> Would you like another butter tart?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dominic
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2018 20:51:37 -0400
> Subject: Whereas Chucky Leblanc is going down memory lane with Blaine
> Higgs tonight Methinks Dominic Cardy and his buddy Kelly Lamrock
> should remind their boss of a few things N'esy Pas?
> To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, kelly <kelly@lamrockslaw.com>,
> "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, "serge.rousselle"
> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Fraser"<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin
> <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca>, "dan. bussieres"
> <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"
> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "bruce.fitch"
> <bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, Brian
> Gallant <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>, "brian.keirstead"
> <brian.keirstead@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Oliver"<Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, "carl.
> davies"<carl.davies@gnb.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
> Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2"<denis.landry2@gnb.ca>,
> "Stephen.Horsman"<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "wayne.easter"
> <wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
> <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca>, kedgwickriver
> <kedgwickriver@gmail.com>, markandcaroline
> <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, "Wilfred.Roussel"
> <Wilfred.Roussel@gnb.ca>, Kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca,
> gaudet2018@gmail.com, "Gilles.LePage"<Gilles.LePage@gnb.ca>,
> dannysoucypc@gmail.com, dcardy@gmail.com, "Gary.Crossman"
> <Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca>, "Glen.Savoie"<Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca>,
> jeannotvolpe2018 <jeannotvolpe2018@gmail.com>, "jeff.carr"
> <jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
> "jill.green.fton"<jill.green.fton@gmail.com>, MarcelDoiron
> <MarcelDoiron@rocketmail.com>, martykingston2018@gmail.com,
> votemarywilson <votemarywilson@gmail.com>, mikeholland4albert
> <mikeholland4albert@gmail.com>, peggymcleanpchq@gmail.com,
> scott.smith.nms@gmail.com, "Trevor.Holder"<Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca>,
> "Dorothy.Shephard"<Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
> <news@dailygleaner.com>, "David.Raymond.Amos"
> <David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/mr-higgs-and-dominic-cardy-are-trying.html
>
>
> Monday, 22 January 2018
>
> Mr Higgs and Dominic Cardy are trying to learn how to herd cats and
> even the clowns are laughing at the nonsense
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 05:35:32 +0000
> Subject: RE: Mr Higgs and Dominic Cardy are trying to learn how to
> herd cats and even the clowns are laughing at the nonsense
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.  Please be
> assured  that your email will be reviewed.
>
> If this is a media request, please forward your email to
> media-medias@gnb.camedia-medias@gnb.ca
>>.  Thank you!
>
> *************************************
>
> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
> Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre  courriel sera examiné.
>
> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
> media-medias@gnb.camedia-medias@gnb.ca>.  Merci!
>
>
>
> Tuesday, 28 August 2018
>
> For people who haven't seen the interview I made with P.C. Leader
> Blaine Higgs....
>
> https://youtu.be/gJurxc9Msxw
>
> Posted by Charles Leblanc at 1:04 pm No comments :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Cardy, Dominic (LEG)"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 18:23:57 +0000
> Subject: RE: [Possible Spam/Pourriel] Yo Dominic Cardy Butter Tarts me
> arse.Give the all the the Fat Bastard Lamrock methinks the nasty
> neocons made a huge Faux Pas getting in bed with you two Fake Left
> dudes before an election N'esy Pas Donny Boy Arnenault?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Wright, Hamish (LEG)"
> <Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>
>
> Dear David,
>
> I am so sorry that you are unhappy. I hope the butter tart will help.
> Sometimes when I feel sad I'll have two butter tarts. Because we are
> fiscal conservatives we can only send you one butter tart so, if you
> are very sad, maybe you have a special friend who can help you by
> buying the second one? That would be a great example of civil society
> in action, and a very real public/private partnership.
>
> There are so many things I want to say right now but, in the end, all
> that matters is that we are kind to each other, right?
>
> Yours, etc,
>
> Dominic
> ________________________________________
> From: David Amos [motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: November-03-17 3:14 PM
> To: Cardy, Dominic (LEG); Wright, Hamish (LEG); kelly; Higgs, Blaine
> (LEG); leanne.murray; Leanne.Fitch; martin.gaudet; oldmaison; andre;
> Coon, David (LEG); briangallant10; Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM);
> Stephane.vaillancourt; Tom.Mann; Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM);
> Jacques.Poitras; nmoore; jeremy.keefe; steve.murphy; newsroom; news
> Cc: David Amos; adawson@acrc.ca
> Subject: [Possible Spam/Pourriel] Yo Dominic Cardy Butter Tarts me
> arse.Give the all the the Fat Bastard Lamrock methinks the nasty
> neocons made a huge Faux Pas getting in bed with you two Fake Left
> dudes before an election N'esy Pas Donny Boy Arnenault?
>
> Say Hey to the Fat Fred City Finest and their union for me will ya?
> Obviously it is the same one the Arseole Donny now work for N'esy Pas
> Chucky Leblanc and Andre Faust?
>
> http://buildingtrades.ca/about-2/staff-directory/
>
> Robert R. Blakely
> Canadian Operating Officer
> Phone: 613-236-0653 ex. 29
>
> Arlene Dunn
> Deputy Director
> Phone: 613-236-0653 ex. 26
> Cell 613 619 0653
>
> DONALD ARSENEAULT
> Government Relations Manager
> Phone: 613-236-0653 ex. 25
>
> Andrew Dawson
> Atlantic Canadian Representative
> Phone: 506-470-5435
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 05:49:51 -0300
> Subject: Re the Corrupt cops in the RCMP and the Fat Fred City Finest
> and their constant whining about pensions they don't earn
> To: david.banks@fredericton.ca, paul.estey@fredericton.ca,
> "frederic.loiseau"<frederic.loiseau@fredericton.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch"
> <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "leanne.murray"
> <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>, "martin.gaudet"
> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, andremurraynow <andremurraynow@gmail.com>,
> lmanzer <lmanzer@gmail.com>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>,
> "peter.dauphinee"<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>, jwambolt
> <jwambolt@nbnet.nb.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
> evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>, mike.obrien@fredericton.ca,
> "david.kelly"<david.kelly@fredericton.ca>, advocacycollective
> <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>, briangallant10
> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Jimmy.Bourque"<Jimmy.Bourque@pcnb.org>,
> "Ted.Hsu"<Ted.Hsu@parl.gc.ca>, "flaherty.j"<flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>,
> freemanrobmenard <freemanrobmenard@gmail.com>, "victor.boudreau"
> <victor.boudreau@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
> leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, "ian.fahie"<ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "bernadine.chapman"<bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "lucie.dubois"
> <lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Juanita.Peddle"
> <Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, woodsideb
> <woodsideb@fredericton.ca>, adawson@acrc.ca, "terry.seguin"
> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>,
> "mclaughlin.heather"<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>,
> "macpherson.don"<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, "greg.weston"
> <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, toewsv1 <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>,
> "marie-claude.blais"<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Quigley"
> <Mike.Quigley@gnb.ca>, "Marc.Leger"<Marc.Leger@gnb.ca>,
> "Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>, "dean.buzza"
> <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>
> Good Evening Mr Banks
>
> How you pension plans doing looks like you have to work long than you
> planned for less. EH? Cry me a river.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/04/04/pension-plans-1/
>
> Better start putting something aside for a lawyer to defend you. I
> will be requesting a copy of all my conversations with you office.
> Trust that nsty bastards laughing a tme and giving me their number
> just won’t do. One thing I for certain I know who you are and just
> exactly what you do with the RCMP thanks to Chucky Leblanc and your
> bragging. Tell me truly dirt the evil Brit Sally Brooks grab your
> balls? Too too funny whether it be true or false.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXUqPPWsfqA
>
> Now this ridiculous
>
> This cop
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AR8jhyoTPo
>
> assaulted his guy on his bike
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2Hl18OIvok
>
> Then this wacko does the same
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFoQXeyfsbs
>
> And the Fat Fred City arrest who?
>
> The recent news easily explains to even the mindless Chucky Leblanc
> why the corrupt Police Chief of Fat Fred City Finest quit after the
> election in 2012.EH?
>
> The real reason MacKnight went for early retirement was because he and
>  his City Council buddies well understood retiring early was far more
> profitable for the crooked bastard.
>
> If anyone had been paying attention they would have known most pension
> plans were in deficit after the economy to a nose dive excluding that
> of the RCMP and their bankster buddies
>
> Victor Boudreau took care of all his provincial underlings in 2009
> byway of the Taxpayer dimes and taxing cigarettes etc even more whilst
> the socialist lawyer Tom Mann bitched about investing in smoking. I
> will wage Mann won’t won’t bite the hand that feeds now that the idiot
> David Alward gave him a big job.
>
> If MacKnight were to quit because of Chucky Leblanc’s  nonsense it
> would have been back in 2007 or 2009
>
> In 2010 when many members of his own Police Force were making
> complaints against him or getting suddenly sick or quitting the City
> Council should had shitcanned him ASAP
> HOWEVER just like old J Edgar Hoover the corrupt Police Chief had the
> dirt on everyone in Fat Fred City so the smiling bastards under
> Woodside paid him off after he was reelected
>
> Anyone can call me a liar if you wish but put it in writing  with a
> true name and signature.
> Everybody and his dog knows MacKnight and his pals attacked me in
> 2004, stole my old Harley in 2007 and have been covering up MURDER and
> Financial Crimes for way past too long’
>
> The fact that the CROWN had refused to prosecute Chucky Leblanc after
> the Fat Fred City Finest arrested him three times and twice at the
> CROWN’s request should have been an embarrassment for the CROWN and
> its corrupt politicians not MacKnight. He was slightly embarrassed
> that his Police Dept had more complaints against it than any other PD
> but that did not bother him because he knew he was protected by the
> CROWN. The proof that he was Woodside’s best btt buddy was when he
> tried to throw the wannbe lawyer Mark Darcy off of public property. As
> soon as Darcy quoted the Charter to MacKnight in front of the press
> and many witnesses MacKnight  ran away and to hide in Woodside’s
> domain whilst Darcy continued yapping to the press inside City Hall.
> Need I say I loved saving Chucky Leblanc’s videos that night?
> Everybody know the Fat Fred City Finest have been illegally harassing
> me on public property since 2004 for the benefit of their political
> puppetmasters and not the people they purported serve.
>
> One month after MacKnight retired I let everybody and his dog know how
> pissed off I got when Acting Chief Leanne Fitch had her minions make
> false allegations against me on behalf of her nasty pal Rob Frenette
> only a month or so after the CBC exposed what a monumental liar he is.
>  It has been many months and I have yet to receive and answer in
> writing or even a call back from Fat Fred City Finest, their lawyer
> Leanne Murray or the Police Commission. However that does not surprise
> me. The Police Commission has answered Chucky Leblanc and his friends
> many times since I made my complaint in 2004 yet I NEVER received an
> answer except one from Danny Copp telling me that I did not respond to
> his queries fast enough while I was falsely imprisoned in a Yankee
> jail. However I did receive MANY emails from Brad Woodside and his
> mindless Deputy David Kelly that they will have to argue in court
> someday.
>
> Murder is a capital crime so there is no statute of limitations. Thus
> I can litigate again anytime I wish. Need I say Chucky’s blogger buddy
> Mr Baconfat has not been helping New Brunswick or Fredericton’s case
> since 2009. With Idle No More heating up for the summer we may not
> have to wait long for some clever greedy Indian lawyers to finally
> read it. Furthermore the deliberate ignorance of my evidence of
> securities crimes and tax crimes by law enforcement people whose
> mandate is to investigate such things has had a direct effect on
> everybody’s pensions plans.
>
> Any cop or lawyer should confess that ignorance of the law is no
> excuse. What they won’t admit is that every cop should follow his
> mandate and lawyer who received my material should READ the first
> parts of the Law Society Act. As officers of the Queen’s court in
> order to keep their licenses to practice law for a fee they MUST
> protect the public interests and safety. When they receive evidence of
> murder and financial crimes cop should see that it is investigated
> ASAP. If a lawyer gets the same stuff from someone who is not a client
> even if they pretend to not understand it they still must report it to
> law enforcement ASAP. If a client asks them to do so and seeks
> protection and they don’t they are criminals as well. Need I say the
> legions of governmental lawyers and politicians are in deep shit with
> mean old me? That is why everybody plays dumb and nobody dares to say
> my name not even the tough talking Chucky Leblanc. It truly is that
> simple. I must ask the obvious question.
>
> Everybody knows I have many wiretap tapes of the mob and have given
> many to various cops, the RCMP, the FBI, CISNB, the US Senate
> Judiciary Committee and even the Arar Inquiry. Hell the Fat Fred City
> Finest willingly stole some wiretap tapes along with my old Harley.
> The very dumb cop Randy Reilly asked me to take my stuff out of my
> saddlebags and I refused. I had served him a pile of documents that he
> refused so it as my turn to say no. I simply told him if he was gonna
> steal my bike registered in the USA he can steal it all. I immediately
> called Martin Gaudet the cop supervising him that night and Gaudet was
> so ignorant he would not even give me the Tow Company contact
> information.
>
> http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.ca/2013/04/fredericton-police-force-in-action.html
>
> For the record I also called the FBI and told them of the wiretap
> tapes in the saddlebag. I heard that in return the Yankees claimed my
> bike was stolen and it did disappear from SNB records. A !965 Harley
> Davidson completely original even the paint does not evaporate. I have
> heard of the arsehole Alan MacPhee bragging to women that he has a
> nice old Harley he is going to restore. He must be waiting for me to
> die first because if I or friends of mine see it on the streets in Fat
> Fred City there will be a call about a stolen Harley immediately. I
> sent his boss and several lawyers registered mail about my bike in
> 2007 as soon as the CROWN refused to press charges against me or
> provide any information at all. Since 2007 and as recently as December
> 2012 many cops have affirmed that there is no warrant for my arrest
> for any unpaid fines or anything else. However in 2012 the CROWN did
> send me some interesting information about my motorcycle and Judge
> Richards” involvement in the matter...I remember her when she was in
> charge of court documents when a pile of disappeared from the dockets
> in 2004 In 2005 she was the Sheriff who ignored me when I complained
> that one of her deputies had me illegally removed from court for the
> benefit of the lawyer David Lutz who was involved in the same matters
> involving the aforementioned missing documents .Whenever I ask about
> my Harley or their tickets now the Fat Fed City Finest only laugh and
> say what Harley or not my problem and end the conversation because the
> suddenly become to busy drinking free Tim’s coffee and eating donuts
> to talk anymore? Just how dumb are the Fat Fred City Finest, many
> other police depts. and Alward’s provincial minions to say such things
> and  try to block my emails after you even the GOVERNOR GENERAL etc
> have already acknowledged getting Hard Copy from me and the cops and
> even the New Brunswick police Commission recorded our conversation
> since 2004 DUHHH????
>
> I began with you David Banks so I will end with you. As you no doubt
> know the CRTC wants to study 911 operations and new technology. Does
> that not include emails?  You can bet that the CRTC already are well
> aware of the Fredericton Police and the RCMP and the 911 operators
> they have in common acting under the very nasty chickenshit named
> David Banks. Perhaps you should ask them if you can read the emails
> the Fat Fred City Finest blocked or ignored. BTW please notice who
> else got this email then tell you lawyer Leanne Murray to scroll down
> and go fine the Hard Copy of many document that the Attorney General
> Brad Green admitted they have had since 2004. That includes a true
> copy of a Yankee wiretap tap just like Chucky Leblanc’s buddies stole
> from me in 2004 and finally gave to the Fat Fred City Finest at Xmass
> time 2010 REMEMBER MacKnight sent Mikey Wilson out looking for me
> immediately afterwards merely because I call David Kelly about you
> dudes and his ex Bobbi too? He always speaks for you does he not? You
> cannot deny that he has sent us all the same emails. I doubt you are
> blocking his CORRECT???
>
> In closing I must say all the corrupt cops within the Fat Fred City
> Finest and the politicians they serve deserve not one red cent of
> their wages or pensions. In fact most should be in JAIL.
>
> What say you now Chucky Baby Leblanc? I bet you and all your crybaby
> associates will continue to play dumb as you call me names and pray
> that I die soon N’esy Pas?
> SHAME ON YOU ALL
>
> YOU BASTARDS DEFINITELY DO GET THE GOVERNMENTS YOU DESERVE
>
> ASK DAVEY BABY COON. HE KNOWS EVERTHING EH???
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tipHN1HAHI8
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zxuft6s-8Lk
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=caq7j2KCnYE
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
> Fredericton police chief steps down
> Barry MacKnight is retiring on July 1
> CBC News
> Posted: Jun 20, 2012 3:02 PM AT
>
> Fredericton Police Chief Barry MacKnight has announced that he will be
> stepping down on July 1.
>
> MacKnight, 49, said he was planning to retire in early 2013, but has
> come to an agreement with the city where the early retirement
> provisions of the contract will be honoured.
>
> MacKnight, who plans to find another job, says his early departure
> from the force has nothing to do with LeBlanc's case.
>
> Pension changes will ensure 'long-term integrity'
>
> Finance Minister Blaine Higgs says task force report will be released
> this session
> By Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon, CBC News
> Posted: Mar 27, 2012 3:57 PM AT
>
> Changes to provincial pension plans that will help address the plans'
> deficits and ensure their sustainability are coming soon, says the
> finance minister.
>
> The provincial task force on protecting pensions is expected to report
> to the government during this session, Blaine Higgs said Tuesday as
> part of his budget speech.
>
> The task force will recommend how to put the appropriate rules and
> regulations in place for the long-term sustainability of existing
> pension plans, both public and private, he said.
> “Our goal is to ensure that employee benefits that have been earned to
> date will not be negatively affected by future changes while we
> separate pension reform from the collective bargaining process," he
> said.
>
> The provincial government will seek ways to expand the coverage of
> affordable, sustainable pension plans in New Brunswick to residents
> who currently do not have adequate pension plan coverage, said Higgs.
>
> The changes will be fair to both employees and taxpayers, he said.
> “Our government’s vision is that New Brunswickers should have the
> opportunity for a safe and secure retirement," the finance minister
> said.
>
> "We must also provide assurance to pension contributors that the
> long-term integrity, due diligence and rigour necessary in the
> business and financial operations of the system are maintained at a
> high level."
>
> The Alward government launched a review of public sector plans in
> September. It is expected to include consultation with the public,
> including employees, contributing employers, union representatives and
> pensioners.
>
> The same task force is also reviewing private sector plans.
>
> Higgs said pension plans are facing deficits because people are living
> longer after retirement than previously predicted and market values
> have been lower than expected.
> "Those are the issues we're trying to address because if we don't, it
> will be a problem," he told reporters. "We will fix it...We have a
> program that will do just that."
>
>
>
> charles leblanc oldmaison@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Where are ya living now???? Since the media seem to ignore ya?
>
> I'll sit down for a debate with a recorder for the blog...Now?
>
> Don't get all exicted and send this all over the world.....lol
>
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 07:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> Subject: Who says they are ignoring me Chucky? Ask Barry McKnight why
> the Yankees are researching him
> To: news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca,
> info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
> police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
> Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
> CC: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, whalen@fredericton.ca,
> david.kelly@fredericton.ca, cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca,
> stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca, tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca,
> scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca, marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca,
> walter.brown@fredericton.ca, norah.davidson@fredericton.ca,
> mike.obrien@fredericton.ca, bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca,
> dan.keenan@fredericton.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
> mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
> jlmockler@mpor.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca,
> jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 1,013
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 206.15.101.# (NEWS CORPORATION)
> ISP NEWS CORPORATION
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : New York
> City : New York
> Lat/Long : 40.7605, -73.9933 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft Win2000
> Browser Firefox 2.0
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3)
> Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit May 23 2007 6:17:17 pm
> Last Page View May 23 2007 6:17:17 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...%22barry mcknight%22
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words fredericton police department "barry mcknight"
> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time May 23 2007 5:17:17 pm
> Visit Number 1,013
>
> Survey of Fredericton police officers finds poor morale within
> forcePublished on February 11, 2010
>
> Published on February 25, 2010
> The Canadian Press ~ The News     Topics : Fredericton
>
> FREDERICTON - Mayor Brad Woodside has told police Chief Barry
> MacKnight to improve morale within his department following the
> release of a survey that showed a lack of confidence by officers in
> the abilities of upper management.
>
> "What I am saying to the police is sit down, clean it up and deal with
> it," Woodside said Wednesday.
>
> The report, prepared for the Fredericton police union, found that only
> 10 per cent of survey respondents had confidence in MacKnight, while
> 26 per cent had confidence in Deputy Chief Leanne Fitch.
>
> It also questioned the chief's accessibility, his vision for the
> future, and his ability to communicate effectively.
>
> "Labour management seems to be a problem there," Woodside said. "I
> have spoken to the city administrator. I have spoken to the chief and
> I want morale back where it should be and I want these issues dealt
> with."
>
> MacKnight said he takes responsibility when things go wrong in the
> police department.
> "We are going to address the issues that can be addressed and should
> be addressed," he said. "This is an important issue for us (but) we
> are not going to make any snap decision."
>
> The survey suggested that a climate of fear exists within the force
> and that members feel MacKnight believes all public complaints made
> against officers.
>
> MacKnight said the past year was a tough one for officers with respect
> to public complaints.
>
> "One of the major themes I am taking away from this is anxiety about
> internal investigations," he said.
>
> He said he's accessible to members of the force but admitted some
> people may feel he isn't.
>
> MacKnight said morale is always a concern because it has a direct
> impact on the provision of good services to citizens.
>
> He said he will go over the report and identify what its major themes
> are and what can be done to address them.
>
> Wednesday, April 07, 2010
>
> I support Fredericton Police Chief Barry MacKnight 100%!!!!
>
> During these past few months, there's lots of stories about battles
> between the Police Union and the Police Chief.
>
> The Union release a Poll among their members saying only 10% of the
> force supports their Chief.
>
> I first heard of problems a couple of years ago.
>
> I was surprise because the Cops are doing a fantastic job in keeping
> this City safe.
>
> Who's responsible for Fredericton to be a safe City?
>
> Our leaders at the top of the Fredericton Police Force?
>
> I would say - Yes!!
>
> I chatted with some Business owners during the past month and everyone
> is supporting the way the Cops are patrolling the Downtown area.
>
> They are walking the beat and clearing the troublemakers from the Downtown
> core.
>
> I have met Police Chief Barry MacKnight on a few occasion and found
> the Chief a nice pleasant gentlemen to chat with.
>
> I might add I was very surprise when he spoke Le Francais en Chiac!!!
>
> lol
>
> THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE NEED!!!
>
> lol
>
> The chief chiac was proven when he launched the new cruiser....
>
> Here's a blog I wrote on this issue -
>
> I'm happy they never went with the Black and White Cruiser they have
> in Bathurst!
>
> But it sure reminds you for a nice cold Canadian eh???
>
> lol
>
> What's a Emergencie??? We chiac Acadians say - Emergency!!..lol
>
> Urgence???
>
> SO? WHAT DO YOU THINK OF NEW COLORS???
>
> Myself, I didn't like the new colors and Mayor Brad Woodside agreed!!!
>
> Click below for video -
>
> But seriously??? Why are so many members of our Police Force upset
> with the Chief?
>
> Is he demanding too much from the Union Members?
>
> His contract is up for renewal in July and the local media are pushing
> the issue.
>
> This is the very first time there's a contract renewal with a Police Chief.
>
> In the past, former Police Chiefs were there for 20 years.
>
> Who will decide Barry MacKnight future?
>
> The Councilors at City Hall?
>
> Will this be an open meeting?
>
> Will the public have a say?
>
> I tried to get some answers but everyone is keeping their mouth shut
> on this issue.
>
> Lets say that we do get a new chief and crime goes up? Who will we
> blame? The new Police Chief?
>
> So what's the problem?
>
> I know for a fact many members of the Police Force reads this Blog.
> Maybe they can tell the readers what the problem is???
>
> Myself? I support the Police Chief 100% and I hope his contract is
> renewed for another 5 years!!!
>
> P.S. I'm not kissing ass!! I'm just calling it as it is!!!
> Posted by Charles LeBlanc at 8:55:00 AM
>
> 10 comments:
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     How mixed up is Charles? He hates the RCMP who have never
> arrrested him and loves the Fredericton Police who have.
>     11:14 AM, April 07, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Any complaints fabricated against the Fredericton Police are
> simply the quebec spreading organization trying to force french on
> everything by getting Fredericton policed by RCMP. But Moncton has had
> their fill!
>     11:22 AM, April 07, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Do police cars in Fredericton real have EMERGENCIE instead of
> URGENCE for the french portion on their police cars?! I have noticed
> that but if this is the case, it is simply unbelievable!! How can this
> have happened?
>     11:29 PM, April 07, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Hey Charles,Fredericton doesnt need 2 police forces,we have the
> R.C.M.P at the top of Regent street,the city force on Queen street. I
> think we should disband the chief and his car kicking bandits and
> replace mayor Woodside at the same time.Our chief hasnt the right to
> wear a badge or call himself a cop,he isnt anything more then a social
> worker
>     11:51 PM, April 07, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Exactly what a Police Officer needs to be, A Social Worker. An
> educated Social Worker. Not a bilingual shortcake!
>
>     7:42 AM, April 08, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     I agree, our police officers should be trained as social workers
> and counselors and not the thugs we have today.
>
>     Maybe throw in some non violent conflict resolution training as well.
>     10:32 AM, April 08, 2010
>
> jimoickle@hotmail.com said...
>
>     My view of both Chief and Deputy Chief remains the same. I will go
> on a lie detector with them both any time. Deputy Chiefs brother was
> involved with stealing all the assets in a Civil Case from a truck
> parked as requested by City Police Officers. I have tried to have
> charges laid only to have them make me out to be the criminal. The
> witnesses are many upstanding citizens yet I can't even get police to
> discuss. They are a joke and MacKnight is the biggest joke. You may
> think I'm crazy but ask Conrad Mead of CKTP, his 3 sons, Robb
> Hartland(Double B), my father Norman Oickle, Tony Mcfaggen, Peter
> Keith, and they will confirm that this theft occurred. They saw the
> evidence and the way the police harassed me when I tried to press
> charges. This theft was done with the help of numerous officers and
> can be proven. Ten minutes on a lie detector for the chief and I would
> settle it. I deserve at least that for all I did for my community
> before these protectors of the Law got involved. I will sign my name
> and assure you Charles the others I mention will confirm the handling
> of my case was Criminal.
>
>     12:24 AM, April 09, 2010
> jimoickle@hotmail.com said...
>
>     For the record...Up until this truck was broken into I never had a
> single problem with the City Police nor did I have a single thing on a
> Criminal Record over my 50 years as an upstanding citizen. I will put
> my record along side a few of the forces detectives any time. Lets
> fire up the Lie Detectors and then you will see some fired. Come on
> Barry you were the one who wanted all the newbie's on your force to
> take a Lie Detector Test. You and I can prove how well they work. If
> I'm wrong I pay all cost...if right give me back my eguipment and
> press charges against those who were paid to uphold the Law not twist
> it for their own purposes.
>     1:16 AM, April 09, 2010
>
> Magos said...
>
>     Lie detectors don't work.
>     10:12 AM, April 09, 2010
>
> Anonymous said...
>
>     Barry thinks they do as he is the one that stated in Daily Garbage
> he would like to see all new recruits have to take one before being
> accepted into his Farce. Charles the next time you see Barry you
> should get him on video answering you in regards to his feelings on
> Lie Detectors and wether they work or not.
>
>     2:29 PM, April 10, 2010
>
> Fredericton police chief steps down
> Barry MacKnight is retiring on July 1
> CBC News
> Posted: Jun 20, 2012 3:02 PM AT
>
> Related Stories
>
> RCMP takes over Charles LeBlanc arrest probe
>
> Woodside concerned over handling of blogger's arrest
>
> Fredericton blogger's arrest attack on civil liberties
>
>  Fredericton Police Chief Barry MacKnight says he was planning to
> retire in 2013, but decided to step down next month instead. (CBC)
> Fredericton Police Chief Barry MacKnight has announced that he will be
> stepping down on July 1.
>
> MacKnight, 49, said he was planning to retire in early 2013, but has
> come to an agreement with the city where the early retirement
> provisions of the contract will be honoured.
>
> "It was an opportunity that came up and I talked to the city
> administrator and the mayor and we came to an agreement, simple as
> that," he told CBC News Wednesday.
>
> “The time was right," MacKnight said earlier in a statement.
> "It is time for a change."
>
> MacKnight has been chief for seven years and on the force for 25 years.
> It's been "a satisfying run," he said in the statement, calling it an
> "honour" to work with so many professional police officers and a
> "privilege" to work with city council and staff.
> "I know I am leaving the city in the good hands of a very professional
> and dedicated police force, and I am proud of that," MacKnight said.
>
> 'I especially appreciate that he always worked with the city’s best
> interests at heart.'—Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside
>
> "I also want to thank the people of Fredericton for their support over
> my tenure."
> Fredericton Mayor Brad Woodside says the process to choose a successor
> will be decided in the coming days after he discusses the matter with
> council and the chief administrative officer.
>
> MacKnight served the city well, Woodside said.
> "I especially appreciate that he always worked with the city’s best
> interests at heart and I wish him the very best in any future
> endeavours."
>
> On heels of blogger controversy
> MacKnight's retirement comes on the heels of difficulties between the
> force and controversial blogger Charles LeBlanc.
>
> LeBlanc, who faced charges of criminal libel earlier this year for
> allegedly damaging the reputation of a police officer on his website,
> was arrested at the legislature last month.
> Police said LeBlanc was arrested after a complaint of "assault by
> trespasser." LeBlanc has been banned from the legislature grounds
> since 2006.
>
> LeBlanc is scheduled to appear in court on June 25.
>
> The investigation has since been handed over to the RCMP.
>
> MacKnight, who plans to find another job, says his early departure
> from the force has nothing to do with LeBlanc's case.
>
> "It's an important issue, but we deal with important issues here every
> single day," he told CBC News. "It's what police officers do every day
> — they make very difficult decisions based on good faith and the
> information they have at the time.
>
> "I can't be any clearer about this," he said. "The past two months
> have been no harder than any few months I've ever been in this job.
> Yeah, this is a hard job, and somethimes the media is engaged in the
> issues we're dealing with and sometimes they're not."
>
> MacKnight said the investigation will continue with the city
> administrator. He declined to comment any further on the case.
>
> LeBlanc's arrest came just days after he and his lawyer called for a
> public inquiry into the Fredericton Police Force's handling of a raid
> at LeBlanc's home in January.
>
> LeBlanc, who writes a controversial blog that is often critical of
> police officers, politicians and the legislature's sergeant-at-arms,
> was accused of damaging the reputation of a city police officer in
> blog posts last summer.
>
> Police seized his computer and LeBlanc says he was told he would be
> facing charges of criminal libel.
>
> But on May 4, the provincial government announced it would not be
> proceeding with criminal libel charges against LeBlanc, saying that
> section of the Criminal Code has been deemed unconstitutional by other
> jurisdictions.
>
> From: "Mazerolle Stephens, Angela(JUS)"Angela.MazerolleStephens@gnb.ca
> Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:39:20 -0300
> Subject: RE: "I have to caution you, this is not a game." Karlheinz
> Schreiber
> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Mr. Amos:
>
> Receipt is acknowledged of the five pieces of e-mail you sent to me on
> May 14, 2009.
>
> Upon review, it is apparent that they do not relate to me either
> personally or professionally. Please note that your correspondence is
> unwanted and unwelcome.
>
> Please do not send me any more of your communications, as I find them
> harassing in nature.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Angela Mazerolle Stephens
> Superintendent of Pensions
> Office of the Superintendent of Pensions Department of Justice and
> Consumer Affairs
> Province of New Brunswick
> Frederick Square, Ste. 450
> 77 Westmorland Street
> P.O. Box 6000
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1
> Ph: (506) 453-2055
> Fax: (506) 457-7266
>
> E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE
> This e-mail and the information contained in it is confidential, may be
> privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the
> addressee(s). Any other person is strictly prohibited from using,
> disclosing, distributing or reproducing it. If you have received this
> communication in error, please reply by e-mail to the sender and delete
> or destroy all copies of this message.
>
> CLAUSE DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ POUR LES ENVOIS PAR COURRIEL
> Le présent courriel et les renseignements qu'il contient sont
> confidentiels, peuvent être protégés par le secret professionnel et
> sont à l'usage exclusif du (des) destinataire(s) susmentionné(s). Toute
> autre personne est par les présentes avisée qu'il lui est strictement
> interdit d'en faire l'utilisation, la diffusion, la distribution ou la
> reproduction. Si cette transmission vous est arrivée par erreur,
> veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par
> courriel, puis effacer ou détruire toutes les copies du présent
> message.
>
> Boudreau defends pension plans' $21M investment in big tobacco
> Last Updated: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 | 9:10 AM AT
>
> CBC News
> Related
>
> N.B. pensions have $21M in tobacco companies
>
> N.B. moving ahead in lawsuit against big tobacco
>
> Anti-smoking group cheers N.B. lawsuit against tobacco companies
>
> External Links
> New Brunswick provincial pension investments
>
> (Note: CBC does not endorse and is not responsible for the content of
> external sites - links will open in new window)
>
> Finance Minister Victor Boudreau said tobacco companies that are being
> sued by the province have proven to be strong investments for the New
> Brunswick Investment Management Corp.
>
> 'The New Brunswick Investment Management Corporation has a mandate of
> getting a maximum return on their investments so that our pension
> funds can continue to grow.'— Finance Minister Victor Boudreau
>
> When the Liberal government launched the lawsuit against tobacco
> companies in 2006, two cabinet ministers said it was about holding
> them accountable for the soaring health-care costs attributed to those
> who used their products.
>
> But Boudreau said on Tuesday when it comes to making money on the
> province's pension plans, it's important for investment managers to
> earn revenue any way they can.
> "The New Brunswick Investment Management Corporation has a mandate of
> getting a maximum return on their investments so that our pension
> funds can continue to grow," he said.
>
> The pension funds lost almost $2 billion in the markets last year,
> including on its tobacco stocks. But the finance minister said over
> the years the tobacco industry has proved to be a strong money maker.
>
> The records released last week by the New Brunswick Investment
> Management Corp. show heavy investments in Imperial Tobacco, Rothmans,
> British American Tobacco, Philip Morris, its parent company Altria
> Group and R.J. Reynolds.
>
> The provincial government agency that manages the pension funds of
> public servants, teachers and judges had holdings in those companies
> worth about $21.2 million on March 31, 2008.
>
> Those same companies are all targets in a lawsuit launched in December
> 2006 by the province. New Brunswick alleges the companies failed to
> warn consumers of the dangers of smoking, marketed light cigarettes as
> safe and targeted children in their advertising campaigns. It argues
> those actions all led to widespread health problems and public medical
> costs for those who began smoking.
>
> N.B. union wants tobacco companies snuffed out of pensions
>
> N.B. pension holdings on March 31, 2008
> • $10.6 million in Phillip Morris and its parent, Altria Group.
> • $4.9 million in British American Tobacco.
> • $2.7 million in Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd.
> • $2.4 million in Rothmans Inc.
> • About $600,000 in R.J. Reynolds.
>
> The New Brunswick Union of Public and Private Employees, one of the
> largest contributors to the province's pension funds, is joining the
> Canadian Cancer Society and New Brunswick Lung Association in calling
> for the province to dump its investments in tobacco companies.
>
> Tom Mann, the union's executive director, said his 5,800 members don't
> like it being invested with cigarette manufacturers.
>
> And he said because of the amount the union contributes to the
> pensions that it should have some sway in where that money is parked
> by the pension plan.
>
> "Certainly the people who own that money should have a say in how it's
> invested," Mann said.
>
> Kenneth Maybee, the president of the New Brunswick Lung Association,
> said on Tuesday that the province's pension fund managers must stop
> investing in tobacco companies, calling the revelation an "eye-opener"
> that was "disconcerting."
>
> "It's perhaps one of these cases where one arm [of the government]
> doesn't know where the other arm is. But I think the message will be
> very clear … that it's not the right thing to do," Maybee said.
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/04/02/nb-fredericton-police-pension-morale.html
>
> Fredericton police morale at 7-year low, union rep says
> Shared-risk pension dispute latest in a string of issues
> CBC News
> Posted: Apr 2, 2013 12:09 PM AT
>
> Pension experts eye changes to save benefits
> A leader with the union representing Fredericton police officers says
> morale on the force is at a seven-year low with the unresolved pension
> issue the latest in a string of issues.
>
> Andrew Dawson says officers have been without a collective agreement
> for more than two years, without a permanent chief since last summer,
> have faced criticism over their handling of a blogger's case, and are
> now facing the possible loss of pension benefits as the city moves to
> a shared-risk plan.
>
> "We have one member with nearly 25 years of service who, when it
> became clear that the city was going down this road, he just went in
> and tendered his resignation and said, ‘No, you know what? Enough is
> enough. I'm going home,'" said Dawson.
>
>  Police union leader Andrew Dawson said the lack of information about
> the city's pension plans is troubling. (CBC)
>
> "And there are many who are nearly as distressed about what exactly it
> is the city is doing. The lack of information is the big thing.”
>
> Fredericton council had unanimously approved a plan on March 18 to
> convert the city’s pension plan to a shared-risk model, which has been
> promoted by the provincial government.
>
> Under the new plan, city employees will have to work longer with fewer
> guarantees. Pensioners will also see changes to their cost-of-living
> adjustment.
>
> Dawson says the police union was only officially notified of the plan
> six days before the city took action.
>
> "It seems the city has been moving this way for a long time, but we
> haven't been part of the process at all," he said.
>
> The Labour and Employment Board ruled switching to the new plan would
> have to be delayed for the police and fire departments until both
> groups have gone through arbitration hearings.
>
> The police union is not planning any job action, said Dawson.
>
> Two weeks have been set aside for an arbitration hearing in mid-June,
> he said. "We know we'll be able to present our case and get a fair
> answer finally."
>
> Firefighters are expected to go into an arbitration hearing with the
> city later this month.
> Meanwhile, city officials have said they will continue informal
> pension talks with the two unions, hoping they will agree to the
> shared-risk model.
>
> The city's current plan has a $60-million deficit.
>
>
> CRTC seeks public input on 911 emergency service
> Commission looking to improve service by utilizing new technologies
> The Canadian Press
> Posted: Dec 17, 2012 5:07 PM AT
>
> The CRTC is conducting a public consultation on ways it can improve
> Canada's 911 emergency service. (Darren Staples/Reuters)
>
> Canada's telecom regulator is asking for the public’s input on how to
> improve the 911 emergency service in light of changing technology.
>
> The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission said
> Monday it will review the findings of the public consultation which
> asks for Canadians' input in the following areas:
>
> • The performance and adequacy of the technology currently employed by
> 911 services, such as that used to locate a caller using a cellphone.
> • The issues related to the provision of 911 services on
> next-generation networks, including how systems should be designed and
> the appropriate institutional arrangements.
> • Policy considerations on 911 matters.
> "Each year, the 911 system is relied upon by thousands of Canadians
> during emergency situations," national commissioner Tim Denton said in
> a news release. "As telecommunications networks evolve and adopt new
> technologies, we all have an interest in ensuring that the system
> continues to meet Canadians' needs."
>
> The CRTC said Denton will conduct research on 911 services in light of
> the telecommunications system's evolution to next-generation networks
> based on Internet Protocol.
>
> "In particular, I would encourage first responders, call centre
> operators and governmental bodies to share their ideas on how the 911
> system could help them better respond to emergency situations," Denton
> said.
>
> The commissioner's recommendations will be presented before May 2013
> and consulted when the CRTC begins its formal review of the regulatory
> framework for Canada’s 911 system.
>
> The formal consultation will be completed in 2014-15.
> With files from CBC News
>
> Anti-bullying advocate faces questions over tactics
> Bullying Canada co-founder defends handling of complaints
> By Jacques Poitras, CBC News
> Posted: Jun 21, 2012 7:53 AM AT
>
>  Rob Frenette, who was given the Order of New Brunswick for his
> community service in 2011, is facing questions over his tactics. (CBC)
>
> A high-profile anti-bullying activist in New Brunswick is being
> criticized for the way he challenges institutions and organizations.
>
> A school superintendent says Rob Frenette was not realistic in
> demanding District 14 respond within hours to a complaint about
> bullying at a Woodstock school.
>
> And NB Power says it has not been able to substantiate Frenette’s
> allegations of 400 to 500 bullying complaints at the Crown
> corporation.
>
> Frenette is standing by his actions in both cases. He would not agree
> to an interview but sent CBC a prepared statement responding to the
> criticisms.
>
> “I've been asked not to do any further interviews on these topics,” he
> said about District 14, “as some are now escalated to the Minister of
> Education/Superintendent. As for NB Power, that file won't be
> discussed any further, unless a employee comes forward.”
>
> Frenette, a victim of bullying himself as a child, co-founded Bullying
> Canada, a national lobbying group, in 2006. He was successful in
> pressuring the New Brunswick government to create an Anti-Bullying
> Day.
>
> Last year, he was named a member of the Order of New Brunswick, the
> province’s highest recognition for community service.
>
> The citation said he was honoured “for his tireless devotion to and
> passionate commitment to ending the spectre of bullying in our
> province and all across Canada."
> Former premier Shawn Graham praised Frenette as “a strong voice
> against bullying and a role model” and current premier David Alward
> has also lauded his efforts.
>
> Bullying Canada is a non-profit organization that has applied for
> charitable status with Revenue Canada. Starting in September, it will
> be required to file some financial information, which will be made
> public.
>
> Frenette says he does not earn a salary from the organization.
>
> Disputed numbers
> Frenette says he first contacted NB Power last September. He went
> public in December, then brought it up again in April.
>
> In the legislature, a Liberal MLA, Brian Kenny, repeated Frenette’s
> claim that Bullying Canada had received 400 to 500 complaints of
> bullying from employees of the utility.
> But NB Power says it has been unable to verify those numbers.
>
> “What we need in order to investigate these and follow through is to
> know locations, know particulars, know names of the people involved,
> and that's been one of the challenges that we have when we've been
> dealing with Bullying Canada,” says Lori Clark, the head of human
> resources at the utility.
>
> “We've not been able to get the information that would allow us to
> deal with the situations.”
>
> Clark says she was surprised by the number.
> “It's not realistic in terms of what we're dealing with,” she says.
> “There's less than 10 cases [at the moment]. In the single digits, in
> fact.”
>
> Ross Galbraith, the manager for the union representing most NB Power
> employees, is also skeptical of the number.
>
> “I've not seen any volume of complaints like that, four or 500,” says
> Galbraith, who adds that his members are never reticent about letting
> him know when they have a problem.
> “It's just a very, very high number. It's an unbelievably high number for
> me."
>
> He says eight to 10 complaints is the number in a normal year and they
> range from outright bullying to harassment to anything else related to
> an employee’s discomfort in the workplace.
>
> Galbraith says when he heard Frenette’s number, “I met with my staff,
> and met with our executive board members, and I asked, 'Is there
> something going on here?' Because I'm not seeing an increase. It's
> about steady—the same type of thing you would get every year.”
>
> Frenette said in an e-mail on June 4 the number is “a log of the
> amount of phone calls and emails we received between September of last
> year and April of this year. We still as of today are receiving calls
> from NB Power staff about concerns.”
>
> In an earlier e-mail response on May 24, Frenette said Bullying Canada
> has decided to direct any NB Power employees to take their complaints
> to their union or the corporation’s ombudsman.
>
> “Our charity’s information and resources are targeted at youth /
> parents,” he said.
> “Our work was never really in to the workplace.
>
> He said he took that decision in light of a fight he is having with
> the utility over several Right to Information requests he made.
> Frenette released portions of the material he received, showing that
> communications officials at the utility were upset about his
> description of the bullying complaints.
>
> He is also appealing NB Power’s refusal to release any documents under
> the Right to Information Act that name him or Bullying Canada.
>
> “NB Power has made it clear that they are not interested in the
> assistance we could offer them,” he added in the e-mail.
>
> “We offered company-wide workshops etc but they declined.”
>
> Frenette says he offered the workshop at no charge, though Bullying
> Canada normally charges $500 per session.
>
> Kathleen Duguay, a NB Power spokeswoman, says Frenette offered both
> for-fee and no-fee workshops, but “at that time NB Power had already
> engaged in workshop development and/or was delivering
> workshop/awareness session with employees.”
> Superintendent says release was damaging
>
> The other organization pushing back against Frenette’s tactics is
> District 14, the school district covering most of the St. John River
> Valley.
>
> The district will no longer exist after this week as a result of a
> provincial reorganization of districts.
>
> In May, Theresa Blackburn, a Woodstock town councillor and community
> college instructor, criticized Frenette in a newspaper column for how
> he handled a bullying complaint at Woodstock Middle School.
>
> Frenette had issued a press release April 29 accusing administrators
> at the school of not acting on a case of bullying.
>
> He issued the release around noon, after contacting the school early
> that morning to advise them he was going public.
>
> Blackburn says that wasn’t nearly enough time for a busy principal or
> superintendent to respond.
>
> “In one fell swoop, I felt that Bullying Canada had ruined the
> reputation of an administration that had worked so hard for the last
> three or four years,” says Blackburn, who dealt with the same school
> officials when her son was bullied.
>
> She says the officials did everything right in her son’s case, but it
> wasn’t quick, as Frenette seemed to be demanding in the new case.
>
> “My son's issues were not resolved in five days. When you're dealing
> with people, it's complex. It's really complex. And it takes more than
> just a couple of emails and the demand of action,” she says.
>
> “Mediation has to take place. There are meetings that have to take
> place. Press releases aren't going to solve what's going on.”
>
> John Tingley, the acting district 14 superintendent, says he was
> visiting schools in the northern part of the district that morning,
> and it was unfair of Frenette to expect a response within a few hours.
>
> “The relationship is more difficult now between the school and the
> parent” as a result of Frenette’s press release, Tingley said.
>
> Frenette says he only issued the release because the family asked for it.
> “That’s a practice that we’ve always had in place,” he said in an
> e-mail statement.
> “We as an organization did not make the decision to issue the media
> release.”
> He says in previous cases, the school principal has not returned his
> calls, and has made it clear in this case “that she would not be
> interested in working with us on this matter.”
>
> He says officials at the Department of Education are now involved and
> until they respond to him, he won’t comment further on the case.
>
>
> FRIDAY, MAY 18, 2012
> How come SGT Andrew MacDonald from the Fredericton Police Force
> received a huge pension after arresting Blogger????
>
>
> How come this Cop who grabbed me from the streets received a huge
> pension and my complaint was denied???
>
> Once again??? The Bad Cops gets away with another one and at the
> Taxpayers expense!!!
>
> Yes...the Citizens in Fredericton are in great danger for these VERY bad
> Cops!!!
>
> Here's the story - < We need a Provincial Inquiry on the way the Less
> fortunate are being treated in this Province!!!! >
>
> Just received this letter today!!!! So I guess with the retirement of
> Andrew MacDonald? My complaint is officially over!!!
>
> Click below for story -
>
> SGT ANDREW MACDONALD IS FORCE TO RETIRE AFTER HE ARRESTED THE BLOGGER!!!
>
> Here's the letter!!!
>
> You newcomers can watch the video!!
>
> The confrontation -
>
> Part one
>
> http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/O50mtX6K4Jo?fs=1&hl=en_US
>
> Part two
>
> http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/vMH5jrI20Z4?fs=1&hl=en_US
>
> The Arrest -
>
> Part one -
>
> [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ph4t_yLFmsE&hl=en&fs=1]
>
> Posted by Charles LeBlanc at 6:51:00 PM
> 4 comments:
>
> Anonymous said...
> Well, more video's of unreasonable behaviour by public servants and
> proof of a complete waste of public funds giving these morons jobs.
> Good for you keeping your cool Charles.
> 7:23 PM, May 18, 2012
>
> Anonymous said...
> "Huge pension" lol...My god you are one simple person .... And how
> much is he getting please tell ?? Or maybe simply because he worked 37
> years for the City of Fredericton ?? Yes Charles, people that work for
> a living can have a pension if they want. You may not know this
> because I understand you dont work at all ...
> 8:21 PM, May 18, 2012
>
> Anonymous said...
> gPaBecause he EARNED it. When someone works for the same organization
> and contributes to a pension fund for at LEAST 30 years, they have
> EARNED a pension. It's NOT a reward!! Now if they have had to deal
> with people like YOU for all those years, they SHOULD get Monetary
> Award or BONUS just for the added headache. I hope you are enjoying a
> wonderful retirement, Andrew!!
>
> Post it if you have the balls, Charles!
> 11:56 AM, May 19, 2012
>
> Anonymous said...
> It is part of having a job, you would not understand.
> 9:40 PM, May 19, 2012
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> To: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca; whalen@fredericton.ca;
> david.kelly@fredericton.ca; cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca;
> stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca; tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca;
> scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca; marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca;
> walter.brown@fredericton.ca; norah.davidson@fredericton.ca;
> mike.obrien@fredericton.ca; bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca;
> dan.keenan@fredericton.ca; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca;
> mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca;
> jlmockler@mpor.ca; scotta@parl.gc.ca; michael.bray@gnb.ca;
> jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
> Cc: news@dailygleaner.com; kcarmichael@bloomberg.net;
> oldmaison@yahoo.com; advocacycollective@yahoo.com;
> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca; cityadmin@fredericton.ca;
> info@gg.ca; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca; rchedore@mosherchedore.ca;
> police@fredericton.ca; chebert@thestar.ca; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca;
> Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca; alltrue@nl.rogers.com;
> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca;
> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:37:04 PM
> Subject: I promised one of the Fat Fred City cop Randy Reilly that I
> would try to make him famous
>
> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=davidraymondamos&search=Search
>
> A man is only as good as his word EH? To bad priests, bankers,
> politicians, lawyers and cops can't claim the same N'est Pas
>
> http://actionlyme.org/FBI_WIRETAPE_TAPES.htm
>
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
>
> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
> From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> Subject: Now everybody and his dog knows TJ Burke and his cop buddies
> allegations against me are false and you had the proof all along EH
> Chucky?
> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbombud@gnb.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net,
> advocacycollective@yahoo.com, Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca,
> cityadmin@fredericton.ca, info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca,
> rchedore@mosherchedore.ca, police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca,
> Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca,
> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca,
> Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
> CC: dgleg@nb.aibn.com, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, whalen@fredericton.ca,
> david.kelly@fredericton.ca, cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca,
> stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca, tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca,
> scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca, marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca,
> walter.brown@fredericton.ca, norah.davidson@fredericton.ca,
> mike.obrien@fredericton.ca, bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca,
> dan.keenan@fredericton.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
> mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
> jlmockler@mpor.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca,
> jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/05/24/nb-burkethreat.html
>
> http://www.canadaeast.com/ce2/docroot/article.php?articleID=149018
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2007/05/tj-burke-walking-around-with-rcmp.html
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2006/06/fapo-has-meeting-about-panhanding.html
>
> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2007/05/hats-off-to-cbc-reporter-jacques.html
>
> http://maritimes.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=9856
>
> Methinks your liberal pals just made a major faux pas N'est Pas?
> Scroll down Frenchie and go down?.
>
> Threat against Burke taken seriously
>
> By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN
> dgleg@nb.aibn.com
> Published Thursday May 24th, 2007
> Appeared on page A1
> An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and
> Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him
> recently.
>
> Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't
> explain the nature of the threats.
>
> "I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made
> specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told reporters
> Wednesday.
>
> "The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me to a
> couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside or
> have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have some
> added protection and that added comfort."
>
> The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP security
> unit.
>
> Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have
> been in recent weeks.
>
> "When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you have
> to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said.
> "But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my own
> personal safety."
>
> Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed his
> pattern of activity.
>
> "It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife feel awful
> nervous."
>
> Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a
> lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick.
>
> "(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure my
> family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in general due
> to my background and training.
>
> "I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had to
> happen."
>
> Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security concerns.
>
> "We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where threats
> have to be taken pretty seriously," he said.
>
> Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001,
> security in New Brunswick has been
> beefed up.
>
> Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all
> visitors are screened.
>
> The position of attorney general is often referred to as the
> province's "top cop."
>
> Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role as
> the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually
> prosecutes them.
>
> "With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had numerous
> threats since Day 1 in office."
>
> Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do with it.
>
> "I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a matter
> and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them
> their punishment or their sanction," he said.
>
> Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated?
>
> "I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied.
>
> Reporters asked when the threat would be over.
>
> "I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said
> Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source."
>
> Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative government,
> said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not
> complimentary."
>
> "I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the security
> of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch.
>
> "They look at each and every situation."
>
> Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former
> premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did
> have extra security staff assigned on occasion.
>
> He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with the
> RCMP.
>
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: After you all read real slow and
> listen closely say Hoka Hey to Stockwell Day and Petey Baby MacKay for
> me will ya?
> Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 06:29:37 -0700
> From: "Fitzgerald, Patrick (USACAC)"Patrick.Fitzgerald@usdoj.gov
> To: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> I will be out of the Office until Monday June 4, 2007. If you need to
> contact someone immediately, please call AUSA Eileen Decker at
> 213-894-0721 or my assistant Joan Moon at 213-984-4699.
>




 http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2008/02/from-top-of-world-to-scum-of-earth-in.html

Sunday, February 24, 2008

 

8 comments:

 

Anonymous said...

I know Jim Oickle and have always thought of him as an honest and sincere person. What happened to him was wrong wrong wrong, from the way he was treated by the owners of the City Motel / Lobster Hut who stole his business to him being thrown in the Restigouche Institution in Campbellton because he wouldn't take the crap from anyone anymore. It's amazing what can happen when you start to threaten the establishment with their dirty little secrets. It's about time Jim's story was told. He has suffered so much, I think that this might help him by getting it off his shoulders. I bet a few people aren't going to be happy about it though... his enemies will be out with their knives soon enough...be brave Jim!

11:39 AM 

 

Anonymous said...

Don't worry.
There will be no stories told.

Same as ,there were no stories by the hundreds in the know bout kingsclear ,hatfield,mckenna,et all.

12:01 PM 

 

Anonymous said...

Hey Charles, I'm not sure if you have done a story on this but the Woolastook Park situation with Fred (Paget) and him losing it under "interesting circumstances". With camping season on the way, it will be interesting.
By the way, I think he did a great job. the park was closed when the Gov't owned it because they couldn't maintain it now he has put his life savings into it, they want it back - ridiculous!

1:55 PM 

 

Anonymous said...

charles,
i am glad you wrote a story about jim. i used to work in that building for both the lobster hut and the motel and loved every minute of it.

it's a shame, because the city motel and lobster hut was a good place to go and i was actually proud to say that i worked there instead of mcdonalds like everyone else my age, at the time.

i was there the day the cops all showed up at the motel. i went to the front desk and asked what was going on and my supervisor told me to go home. whoever took over the motel stopped giving me hours and wouldn't give me a reason as to why they stopped scheduling me. instead they said "we'll call you when we need you back", i figured i would wait a bit, and i never got that call back. i was 19, living on my own, paying my own bills and groceries and they didn't even care. i had to move back home and to this day, i will not step foot into that hotel or suggest anyone go there, because it isn't the same.

they ruined the look of the city motel and its not as inviting as it used to be when jim was running it. its quite a shame, really, and a stupid move on their part because now, all you see is an empty parking lot.

i am happy to hear he is still kicking around.

4:51 PM 

 

Anonymous said...

Now you've got my curiousity up. What happened at the City Motel / Lobter Hut anyways? I remember seeing it in the paper, looked like a big scam on the part of the owners to me. Wait until he's just about to take over the lease and steal it from him. We never did hear Jim's side of the story about how those creeps took his business away from him. I used to like the way it looked too, it had character. I think they even used to promote it on the tourism brochures because it was so interesting. Now it looks like any old place on the side of a highway. BORING. The empty parking lot tells it all. Didn't take them long to ruin a good business.

5:55 PM 

 

jimoicke@hotmail.com said...

Charles I'm writing this comment to see if you get comments posted on stories this old. If so I think its time we tell the rest of the story.
I will answer any questions your readers wish to put to me in regards to what they have heard about me. I promise to tell only the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
You had a comment from a sister that I no longer see. Is it possible to retrieve it?

9:46 PM 

 

Blogger Charles LeBlancsaid...

Nope...you told me to remove those stories...

sorry...

3:27 PM 

 

James said...

Good. Better that way, I'm sure an Anon will bring it up in regards to another issue and I will deal with it then. Thanks for taking it down when I asked. Love the Bedbug Story, this place needed to be looked at back when I was in business 4 years ago. Keep up the good work.

1:41 PM

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies






David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Content disabled 
Methinks lots of politicians can still recall all the tricks the FBI and their RCMP buddies pulled in order to secure the illegal extraditions of the First Nations activists Leonard Peltier and John Graham Too bad that Madame Meng's lawyers can't N'esy Pas?





David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others


Methinks Trudeau et al know why I called David Hartman and left him a wicked voicemail then began calling all his cohorts beginning with his new boss Minister Champagne N'esy Pas?


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/global-affairs-official-says-giving.html



#nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/meng-wanzhou-extradition-csis-federal-court-1.5645672







David Raymond Amos‏Replying to @DBHartman
Perhaps you and I should have a long talk very soon?  

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right


Quote Tweet


David Raymond Amos‏




https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/meng-wanzhou-extradition-csis-federal-court-1.5645672

Global Affairs official says giving Meng Wanzhou CSIS documents could hurt Canada

David Hartman swore federal court affidavit in AG's fight for redactions to extradition documents

Jason Proctor· CBC News· Posted: Jul 13, 2020 1:00 AM PT



Meng Wanzhou is seen prior to an appearance in B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver. The Huawei executive is fighting for disclosure of CSIS documents in her bid to avoid extradition to the United States on charges of fraud. (Ben Nelms/CBC)

The director general for Global Affairs Canada in South Asia says disclosing sensitive information from CSIS to Meng Wanzhou as part of her battle against extradition could risk Canadian lives, further damage Chinese-Canadian relations and even compromise the fight against COVID-19.

David Hartman warned against giving the Huawei executive's lawyers unredacted copies of documents from Canada's spy agency in an affidavit sworn as part of a proceeding that will be heard in federal court later this month.

The affidavit was filed in late June in support of the attorney general, who is fighting to keep from public view communication about Meng's arrest between CSIS and the FBI.

"Generally speaking, such disclosure would inflame tensions between the governments of Canada and China, and would, necessarily, provoke a response harmful to bilateral relations and Canadian interests," Hartman's affidavit says.

"Given the consular considerations, disclosure could also risk causing harm to individual Canadian lives."
Hartman served as Global Affairs' executive director for greater China until August 2017.
He and CSIS intelligence officer Michel Guay both filed affidavits in the federal court case, which will be heard during four days of hearings at the end of the month.

The first day of proceedings will be held in public on July 27; the remaining three days will be behind closed doors.

The fight centres on six heavily redacted CSIS documents the attorney general disclosed to Meng's lawyers after an order from the B.C. Supreme Court judge overseeing her extradition case.

The U.S. wants the Huawei chief financial officer sent to New York to face fraud charges in relation to an allegation that she lied to an HSBC executive in August 2013 about her company's control of a firm accused of violating U.S. economic sanctions against Iran.

Prosecutors claim Meng's alleged lies put the bank in danger of violating the same sanctions themselves, risking prosecution and loss as a result.

Meng's lawyers plan to argue that the FBI and Canadian authorities mounted a "covert criminal investigation" against their client, sharing technical information about her electronic devices and conspiring to have Canadian border officers detain and question her without a lawyer for three hours before RCMP placed her under arrest.


CSIS released these heavily redacted documents to lawyers for Meng as part of extradition proceedings. The Huawei executive's legal team is fighting in federal court to have the redactions lifted. (Jason Proctor/CBC)

'Perception of influence'

The CSIS documents include an email, operational notes, a report and three so-called "situation reports" written before and after Meng's arrest at Vancouver's airport on Dec. 1, 2018.

The situation reports state that CSIS received word from the FBI the day before Meng's arrest and that the U.S. agency would "not be present in an effort to avoid the perception of influence."

The reports say the RCMP recognized the "highly political nature of the arrest" and predicted from the outset that Meng's detention would "be of great consequence internationally and bilaterally."

Large portions of all the documents have been redacted.

In their affidavits, both Hartman and Guay stress that they have not viewed the unredacted portions of the documents themselves, so that they won't be at risk of inadvertently disclosing sensitive information during the public proceeding.


Michael Spavor, left, and Michael Kovrig are in Chinese custody, both having been charged with spying. (The Associated Press/International Crisis Group/The Canadian Press)

Hartman describes the damage Meng's extradition case has already caused Canadian-Chinese relations, including the suspension of canola seed imports and the arbitrary detentions of former diplomat Michael Kovrig and entrepreneur Michael Spavor.

Kovrig and Spavor have been held in Chinese prisons since the days immediately following Meng's arrest. Last month, the Chinese formally charged them with spying. Canada hasn't had consular access to either man since January.

Souring public opinions

Hartman says the COVID-19 pandemic has only "underlined the necessity" for Canada to engage in bilateral relations with China.

"China has been an important supplier of personal protective equipment and pharmaceutical products in global supply chains and accounted for a significant portion of medical supplies procured by the Government of Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic," Hartman wrote.

He says "Canadian media coverage and public opinion on China has grown increasingly negative, reflecting public opinion trends globally."

The affidavit traces the change in sentiment to the introduction of a new national security law in Hong Kong, "reports of Chinese intimidation and harassment of human rights defenders in China as well as in Canada" and a "Chinese disinformation campaign around the origins of COVID-19."
  

A still from a video of Meng filed as part of a defence application for access to documents. The video was taken during her first few hours in custody. (Court proceedings)

As a result, Hartman says "it is in Canada's interest to ensure that the management of our necessary but complex engagement with China is not negatively affected even further by the public disclosure of sensitive information."

Guay's concerns about the redacted material are related solely to the impact it might have on national security. He writes about the importance of maintaining confidential sources and of the need CSIS has to share information on the understanding it will be kept confidential.

"If foreign agencies were to lose faith in the commitment of the service to protect confidential third party information, there would be significant impact on the willingness of those agencies to provide information to the service in the future," he says.

'An ongoing role in her arrest'

In federal court documents, Meng's lawyers say the unredacted portions of the CSIS documents make it plain that "not only was CSIS involved in communicating with the FBI and others regarding the planning of Ms. Meng's arrest prior to December 1, 2018, but that CSIS had an ongoing role in the arrest."

As such, they are also seeking emails, texts, telephone logs and briefing notes from CSIS as well as the identity of the authors of the reports.

Meng's lawyers hope to use that information in upcoming B.C. Supreme Court hearings to argue that she was the victim of abuses of process and breaches of charter rights so egregious that the extradition proceedings should be tossed.
The 48-year-old's case is predicted to extend well into 2021. Meng has denied all the allegations against her.

She has been living under a form of house arrest — trailed by security guards and ordered to wear a GPS-monitoring ankle bracelet — in one of two multimillion dollar homes she owns on Vancouver's west side, since her release on $10 million bail the week after her arrest.

 

  

1733 Comments





Benjamin Twine
Is to much to ask that the RCMP do something right ?


Monique Brookes 


























Dave Jones
Well she won't get a fair trial in USA ....yet china is choking itself with its arm lock on our neck....trying to gets us to bow down to them......
Both of them are sabatoging themselves...... 


 



























Jamie Ireland
Drop her in Howe Sound, let the Orcas have a feast . Enough of this fiasco


David Amos 


Dan Boulin
Not only has Canada no "consular access" to either of our two Michaels since January - but even if we did - can you imagine our lawyers asking the Chinese for release of sensitive documents from their top spy agencies?
- I think we all know what the answer would be.. 


David Amos 
Reply to @Don Cheer: What are you reading right now? 


David Amos
Reply to @Doug James: Methinks Trudeau was just playing legal games with people's freedom in order to keep Trump "The art of a deal dude" happy enough to secure the wicked NAFTA 2.0 deal for the benefit of his benefactors N'esy Pas?


Oksana Szulhan
Reply to @David Amos:
Meng Wanzhou






















John Sollows
So ... it seems extremely prudent NOT to disclose the information to Meng's lawyers. They may argue successfully that they were denied information they needed to assure a fair trial, and the case subsequently may get tossed for that reason.

Fine by me and the next time the U.S. can do its own dirty work. 

 

leonard g MacAulay
Reply to @david mccaig:
Which is why I agree with John Sollows on this case. Do not release documents, case gets tossed. Security stays intact, Meng goes home and the US looks for another patsey.


David Amos  





















Regina E. Gardzinski 
When will Canada WAKE UP. Do you think the Chinese would provide their intelligence to free the two Michaels? 

 




---------- Original message ----------
From: geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:26:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: What do the many lawyers and bureaucrats
working for Trudeau, Ian Shugart and François-Philippe Champagne have
to say to me now?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing to the office of the Hon. Geoff Regan, Member of
Parliament for Halifax West. This response confirms that your email
has been received.
Our office is currently receiving a higher than normal volume of
correspondence related to COVID-19. However, as always, your comments
and suggestions are very much appreciated. Please note that priority
will be given to constituents of Halifax West. Please reply to your
original email with your postal code and we will reply as soon as
possible.
Please note that my staff and I are currently working from home due to
the COVID-19 pandemic. We are still available by e-mail, and by phone
at 902-426-2217.
You may also find the information you are looking for online:
*     Information on COVID-19 -
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
*     Details on Canada's COVID-19 economic response plan, including
support for individuals and businesses -
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/economic-response-plan.html
Once again, thank you for reaching out to our office.
Yours truly,


Geoff Regan, M.P.
Halifax West
[social-facebook-box-blue-
>
www.Canada.ca/Coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/Coronavirus>
www.novascotia.ca/coronavirus<http://www.novascotia.ca/coronavirus>





---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:26:29 -0300
Subject: What do the many lawyers and bureaucrats working for Trudeau,
Ian Shugart and François-Philippe Champagne have to say to me now?
To: francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca,
alan.kessel@international.gc.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, Rebecca.Netley@international.gc.ca,
David.Hartman@international.gc.ca, Jason.Proctor@cbc.ca,
Catherine.Blewet@pco-bcp.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "geoff.regan"<geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, ilsauottawa@gmail.com, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, laskinsociety@gmail.com

---------- Original message ----------
From: Francois-Philippe.Champagne@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:36:16 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE Federal Court Rule 55 and the "Rule
of Law" myth Trudeau and his minions used against Huawei's CFO Meng
Wanzhou in order to insure NAFTA 2.0 was a deal with Trump
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

* An English message will follow

Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de circonscription fédéral de
Saint-Maurice-Champlain et de votre député François-Philippe
Champagne.

Nous accusons réception de votre courriel.
Cordialement,


Bureau de François-Philippe Champagne
Député de Saint-Maurice-Champlain
Ministre des Affaires étrangères
Bureau de circonscription à Shawinigan :
632, avenue de Grand-Mère, bureau 1
Shawinigan QC G9T 2H5
Tél.: 819 538-5291
Téléc.: 819 538-7624
***************************

Thank you for writing to François-Philippe Champagne's Constituency Office.

We acknowledge receipt of your email.
Kind regards,
François-Philippe Champagne's Office
MP for Saint-Maurice-Champlain
Minister of Foreign Affairs

Constituency Office:
632, avenue de Grand-Mère, suite 1
Shawinigan QC  G9T 2H5
Phone : 819 538-5291
FAX : 819 538-7624



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Shugart, Ian"<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:36:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Rule 55 and the "Rule of
Law" myth Trudeau and his minions used against Huawei's CFO Meng
Wanzhou in order to insure NAFTA 2.0 was a deal with Trump
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


Please note that Ian Shugart, Clerk of the Privy Council, will be out
of the office from July 11 to July 19. During his absence, you can
contact Catherine Blewett at 613-957-5466.

All correspondence and various requests should be routed in the usual manner.

Thank you

**************************************************************

Veuillez prendre note qu’Ian Shugart, Greffier du Conseil privé, sera
absent du bureau le 11 au 19 juillet.  Pendant son absence, vous
pouvez communiquer avec Catherine Blewett au 613-957-5466.

Toute correspondance et autres demandes doivent être acheminées de
façon habituelle.

Merci

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies


David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks Trudeau et al know why I called David Hartman and left him a
wicked voicemail then began calling all his cohorts beginning with his
new boss Minister Champagne N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/global-affairs-official-says-giving.html

#nbpoli #cdnpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/meng-wanzhou-extradition-csis-federal-court-1.5645672



David Raymond Amos‏ Replying to @DBHartman

Perhaps you and I should have a long talk very soon?


https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right



Quote Tweet

David Hartman
@DBHartman

· Jul 6

A heartfelt congratulations to @BobRae48 on your appointment! We’re
all looking forward to working with you in your new role! @CanadaFP
@FP_Champagne @CanadianPM @CanadaUN twitter.com/canadianpm/sta…


David Raymond Amos‏
Replying to @KesselAlan

I just called Correct?


Quote Tweet

Alan Kessel
@KesselAlan

· Apr 4

Proud of you and your Global Affairs Cabada team's commitment to
helping Canadians get home. Your Ottawa colleagues thank and applaud
you all. Stay safe and healthy. twitter.com/KirstenHillman…



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/meng-wanzhou-extradition-csis-federal-court-1.5645672

Global Affairs official says giving Meng Wanzhou CSIS documents could
hurt Canada

David Hartman swore federal court affidavit in AG's fight for
redactions to extradition documents
Jason Proctor · CBC News · Posted: Jul 13, 2020 1:00 AM PT


1369 Comments



Dan Boulin
Not only has Canada no "consular access" to either of our two Michaels
since January - but even if we did - can you imagine our lawyers
asking the Chinese for release of sensitive documents from their top
spy agencies?
- I think we all know what the answer would be..


Show 5 older replies


Don Cheer
Reply to @Doug James:
More CPP propaganda from Xi or is it CPC propaganda
Hard to tell the difference these days

David Amos
Reply to @Dan Boulin: Who picked this fight with China?

Dan Boulin
Reply to @David Amos: Still trying to figure that one out.....

David Amos
Reply to @Don Cheer: What are you reading right now?










John Sollows
So ... it seems extremely prudent NOT to disclose the information to
Meng's lawyers. They may argue successfully that they were denied
information they needed to assure a fair trial, and the case
subsequently may get tossed for that reason.

Fine by me and the next time the U.S. can do its own dirty work.


Show 9 older replies


David Amos
Reply to @John Sollows: I agree After reading the news today trust
that I called David Hartman, left him a wicked voicemail then began
calling allhis cohorts beginning with his new boss Minister Champagne

David Amos
Reply to @david mccaig: "Trump has admitted he wants Ms Meng Wanzhou
in US custody to use as negotiating tool to deal with the Chinese."

True







Regina E. Gardzinski
When will Canada WAKE UP. Do you think the Chinese would provide their
intelligence to free the two Michaels?

Show 4 older replies

Julie Lee
Reply to @Erica Wong: Yeah, sure, they are able to present whatever
"evidence" they need in court to sentence whoever they say guilty

David Amos
Reply to @Regina E. Gardzinski : Methinks if we had ethical
"intelligence" people we would not have become shills for Trump N'esy
Pas?

David Amos
Reply to @Julie Lee: I concur





---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:31:00 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE Federal Court Rule 55 and the "Rule of Law" myth
Trudeau and his minions used against Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou in
order to insure NAFTA 2.0 was a deal with Trump
To: francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca, alan.kessel@canada.ca,
"PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>,
Rebecca.Netley@canada.ca, David.Hartman@canada.ca,
Jason.Proctor@cbc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, ilsauottawa@gmail.com, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, laskinsociety@gmail.com

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/meng-wanzhou-extradition-csis-federal-court-1.5645672


Global Affairs official says giving Meng Wanzhou CSIS documents could
hurt Canada

David Hartman swore federal court affidavit in AG's fight for
redactions to extradition documents
Jason Proctor · CBC News · Posted: Jul 13, 2020 1:00 AM PT


After reading the news today trust that I called David Hartman first

http://www.goc411.ca/en/73417/David-Hartman

David Hartman works as Director General for Global Affairs Canada.
David can be reached at 343-203-4492



Mr Kessel should not deny that he called me and we had a long talk in
2006 not long after Harper named MacKay as his first Minister of
Foreign Affairs


http://www.goc411.ca/en/213061/Alan-Kessel

Alan Kessel works as Assistant Deputy Minister for Global Affairs Canada.
Alan can be reached at 343-203-3571



https://www.jewishottawa.com/community-calendar/bora-laskin-law-society-reception-with-alan-kessel-1538763696


The Bora Laskin Law Society is excited to announce our next event, a
reception featuring a talk by Alan Kessel, Assistant Deputy Minister
of Legal Affairs and The Legal Adviser to Global Affairs Canada. Mr.
Kessel's talk is titled "Canada in International Law: At the
Inflection Point" and will feature his thoughts on the subject
informed by his broad and deep experience as a practitioner and a
Canadian diplomat.

The reception will take place at 7PM on November 7, 2018 at the
offices of Gowling WLG (Suite 2600, 160 Elgin, Ottawa). Gowling WLG
has generously and graciously agreed to host and sponsor this event.

Please join us for what will undoubtedly be an engaging, stimulating
evening with an exceptional speaker, wonderful company and gracious
hospitality.

Space is limited so RSVP to laskinsociety@gmail.com are appreciated.

Sponsor: Bora Laskin Law Society and Gowling WLG


https://ilsaaediuottawa.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/a-talk-with-alan-kessel-assistant-deputy-minister-legal-affairs-and-legal-adviser-to-global-affairs-canada/


A Talk with Alan Kessel, Assistant Deputy Minister Legal Affairs and
Legal Adviser to Global Affairs Canada.
March 6, 2019 

Hey everyone!

Join ILSA, the International Law Group (ILG), and the International
Commission of Jurists Canada (ICJ Canada) for an exciting talk with
Alan Kessel, Assistant Deputy Minister Legal Affairs and Legal Adviser
to Global Affairs Canada. The event will take place next Friday, March
15th from 11:30 – 1:00 in FTX 359!

We are incredibly lucky to have Mr. Kessel join us for this
not-to-miss event!  Here are some details about Mr. Kessel:

Alan Kessel assumed his responsibilities as Assistant Deputy Minister
Legal Affairs and Legal Adviser to Global Affairs Canada in September
2017. Prior to this appointment Mr. Kessel was Deputy High
Commissioner in London between September 2013 and August 2017.

Mr. Kessel has held numerous positions in the Legal Branch of Global
Affairs Canada, including that of the Legal Adviser (2005 – 2013); as
Deputy Legal Adviser and Director General of the Bureau of Legal
Affairs (2004 – 2005); as Director of the United Nations, Criminal and
Treaty Law Division.

Mr. Kessel has spent a large part of his career negotiating bilateral
and multilateral instruments ranging from extradition treaties to the
establishment of international criminal justice systems to prosecute
perpetrators of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Mr.
Kessel has represented Canadian interests before United Nations bodies
and has presented government views at Canadian Parliamentary
Committees. His legal work on Arctic matters has included delineation
of Canada’s continental shelf and sovereignty questions in the far
north.

His postings abroad have included the Canadian Embassy in Sweden (1985
– 1987), the Canadian Mission to the United Nations in Geneva,
Switzerland (1990 – 1994) and the Canadian High Commission in London,
UK (2000 – 2004, 2013 -2017).

Mr. Kessel received his bachelor of Arts degree in 1976 from the
University of Waterloo and his law degree in 1979 from Osgoode Hall
Law School in Toronto. He was called to the Bar of Ontario in 1981.
After several years in private practice in Toronto, he joined the then
Department of External Affairs and International Trade in 1983.

http://www.goc411.ca/en/69835/Rebecca-Netley


Rebecca Netley works as Executive Director for Global Affairs Canada.
Rebecca can be reached at 343-203-2450



http://www.goc411.ca/en/83243/Francois-Philippe-Champagne

François-Philippe Champagne works as Minister of Foreign Affairs for
Global Affairs Canada.
François-Philippe can be reached at 343-203-1851

http://www.goc411.ca/en/291482/Marta-Morgan

Marta Morgan works as Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs for Global
Affairs Canada.
Marta can be reached at 343-203-4911

http://www.goc411.ca/en/263385/Stephane-Levesque


Stéphane Levesque works as Assistant Deputy Minister for Global Affairs Canada.
Stéphane can be reached at 343-203-1650

http://www.goc411.ca/en/229197/Jennifer-MacIntyre

Jennifer MacIntyre works as Corporate Secretary & Director General for
Global Affairs Canada.
Jennifer can be reached at 343-203-3506


http://www.goc411.ca/en/72674/Masud-Husain

Masud Husain works as Director General for Global Affairs Canada.
Masud can be reached at 343-203-2554


http://www.goc411.ca/en/43499/Maroun-Boutros

Maroun Boutros works as Assistant Director for Global Affairs Canada.
Maroun can be reached at 613-437-9133

http://www.goc411.ca/en/Employees/IndexByUnit/C%3dCA%2cO%3dGC%2cou%3dGAC-AMC%2cOU%3dDCD-DCD%2cou%3dDCC-DCC

Georgiana Malurica
Georgiana Malurica works as Senior Correspondence Officer for Global
Affairs Canada.
Georgiana can be reached at 343-203-6637




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 20:57:20 +0000
Subject: RE: RE Federal Court Rule 55 and the "Rule of Law" myth
Trudeau and his minions used against Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou in
order to insure NAFTA 2.0 was a deal with Trump
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.

http://www.goc411.ca/en/83243/Francois-Philippe-Champagne

François-Philippe Champagne works as Minister of Foreign Affairs for
Global Affairs Canada.
François-Philippe can be reached at 343-203-1851
francois-philippe.champagne@parl.gc.ca

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 17:51:47 -0300
Subject: RE Federal Court Rule 55 and the "Rule of Law" myth Trudeau
and his minions used against Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou in order to
insure NAFTA 2.0 was a deal with Trump
To: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
mcu@justice.gc.ca, Renee.Theriault@scc.csc.ca,
Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca, marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca,
Rachel.rappaport@justice.gc.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, rob.moore@parl.gc.ca,
Kathleen.Harris@cbc.ca, media@justice.gc.ca, media@scc.csc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca, Winston.Yep@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, ian.young@scmp.com,
john.carsley@justice.gc.ca, rfrater@justice.gc.ca,
garybotting@shaw.ca, sfenton@fentonlaw.ca,
EGottardi@peckandcompany.ca, rpeck@peckandcompany.ca,
dm@martinandassociates.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca,
Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Alex.Benac@hkstrategies.ca, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>

This was the first blog I published about Meng Wanzhou and YOU people Correct?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/01/huawei-canada-statement-regarding-meng.html



Please enjoy another blog about Meng Wanzhou and YOU people

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/06/pm-rejects-calls-from-19-prominent.html

Thursday, 25 June 2020
PM rejects calls from 19 prominent Canadians to set Meng free to
secure the release of 2 Canadians


https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks now that NAFTA 2.0 is finally a deal the mindless lawyer
David Lametti will be ordered to set Madame Meng free as Trudeau et al
attempt to turn the worm on Trump and make amends with China N'esy
Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/06/pm-rejects-calls-from-19-prominent.html

#nbpoli #cdnpoli

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YB4hewDLiSI


John Bolton on Canada-China tensions and the Trump presidency
15,748 views
Jun 30, 2020

CBC News: The National
A foreign policy hawk with a year-long stint as U.S President Donald
Trump’s national security adviser, John Bolton, sat down with The
National's Adrienne Arsenault to talk about his White House memoir and
his views on Trump’s presidency.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/bolton-trump-trudeau-1.5619484

 CBC News · Posted: Jun 19, 2020 2:22 PM ET |

Bolton's dig at Chretien over Huawei
Bolton's book also takes a quick dig at former prime minister Jean
Chrétien. It involves Chrétien's suggestion that Canada should free
Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou, in Canadian custody pending extradition
to the U.S.

"Never a friend of the U.S., [Chrétien] was arguing that Canada should
simply not abide by our extradition treaty," he writes.





---------- Original message ----------
From: Scott Fenton <sfenton@fentonlaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:24:43 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO David Lametti RE Federal Court Rule 55
easily proves that the "Rule of Law" is a myth in Canada Methinks
lawyers working for Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou will talk to mow
N'esy Pas Nathalie.Drouin?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Please note that I will be out of the office working between January 6
and 24, 2020 and may not be in a position to respond to any emails or
telephone calls in a timely manner.

If the matter is administrative in nature, please contact Sharon
Tagapulot at 416-955-1611 or
stagapulot@fentonlaw.ca<
applewebdata://BCBD5FB1-59C3-4600-BEAF-68BABEEF9EF7/stagapulot@fentonlaw.ca>.

If the matter is urgent, please contact Ian R. Smith at 416-955- 0367
or ismith@fentonlaw.ca<applewebdata://BCBD5FB1-59C3-4600-BEAF-68BABEEF9EF7/ismith@fentonlaw.ca>.

Yours truly,


Scott K. Fenton


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Frater, Robert"<Robert.Frater@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:24:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO David Lametti RE Federal Court Rule 55
easily proves that the "Rule of Law" is a myth in Canada Methinks
lawyers working for Huawei's CFO Meng Wanzhou will talk to mow
N'esy Pas Nathalie.Drouin?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be in court the week of January 20. I will respond to emails
when I am able to do so.




Here is  little more Deja Vu for Mr Frater to enjoy His former boss
Peter MacKay did answer this lawsuit while he was still the Attorney
General and I was running against his fellow Cabinet Minister  Mr
Moore again Correct Mr Trudeau???


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Butts, Gerald"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
Organization commonly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access
to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at
laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.

Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss
limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez
communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse
laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca



---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 01:00:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC,
Banksters and Taxmen
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.

This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.

To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.

Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at mcu@justice.gc.ca or call
613-957-4222.

Thank you

-------------------

Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.

Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.

Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.

Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.

Merci


---------- Original message ----------
From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 13:20:44 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath
to the Queen and the 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big
Bad Billy Casey the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from
NB should explain this lawsuit to you real slow.
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
lalanthier@hotmail.com

Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca

Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
lalanthier@hotmail.com

To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca

Thank you,

Merci ,




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:34:07 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and Taxmen
To: jmwilson@mta.ca, alaina@alainalockhart.ca, stephanie.coburn@greenparty.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

http://james4fundyroyal.weebly.com/

https://alainalockhart.liberal.ca/


http://www.greenparty.ca/en/content/federal-council-new-brunswick-stephanie-coburn



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:18:04 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and Taxmen
To: nicolas@allvotes.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,  brendan@brendanmiles.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tim.Moen@libertarian.ca,
info@democraticadvancementparty.ca

ENJOY

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281544801/Federal-Court-Seal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/281442628/Me-Versus-the-Crown


>
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
 > Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
 > RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
 > actions CORRECT?
 > To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
 > Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
 > <admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca"<mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
 > "media@blaineimmigration.com"<media@blaineimmigration.com>,
 > "Sophia.Harris"<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
 > <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
 > "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
 > <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "mark.vespucci"
 > <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
 > <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
 > <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
 > <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
 > <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
 > washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
 > <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
 > "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
 > Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
 > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 >
 > I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
 > be accessing my Emails.  For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
 > Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
 > Lofaro 613 843 3540..
 >
 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 >
 > Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22  janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
 > mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
 > Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
 > Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
 >
 >
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: "Moore, Rob - M.P."<Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
 > Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
 > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 >
 > On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
 > email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
 > our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
 > receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
 >
 > Constituent of Fundy Royal:
 >
 > The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
 > ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
 > appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
 > ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
 > manner.
 >
 > If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
 > consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
 > activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
 > staff member will be in contact with you.
 >
 > If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
 > 506-832-4200.
 >
 > Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
 >
 > If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
 > appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
 > if his schedule can accommodate.
 >
 > Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
 > Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
 > office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
 >
 > Non-Constituent Enquiries:
 >
 > If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
 > we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
 >
 >  If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
 > as necessary.
 >
 > Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
 > office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
 >
 > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 > From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
 > <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
 > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
 > Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
 > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 >
 > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
 > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
 > comments.
 >
 > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
 > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
 > commentaires.
 >
 >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 >> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
 >> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
 >> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
 >> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
 >>
 >> Mr. Amos,
 >> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
 >> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
 >> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
 >> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
 >> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
 >> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
 >> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
 >>
 >> Department of Justice
 >>
 >>
 >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 >>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
 >>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
 >>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
 >>> To: coi@gnb.ca
 >>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
 >>>
 >>> Good Day Sir
 >>>
 >>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
 >>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
 >>>
 >>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
 >>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
 >>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
 >>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
 >>>
 >>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
 >>> suggested that you study closely.
 >>>
 >>> This is the docket in Federal Court
 >>>
 >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
 >>>
 >>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
 >>>
 >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
 >>>
 >>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
 >>>
 >>> April 3rd, 2017
 >>>
 >>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
 >>>
 >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> The only hearing thus far
 >>>
 >>> May 24th, 2017
 >>>
 >>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
 >>>
 >>> Date: 20151223
 >>>
 >>> Docket: T-1557-15
 >>>
 >>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
 >>>
 >>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
 >>>
 >>> BETWEEN:
 >>>
 >>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
 >>>
 >>> Plaintiff
 >>>
 >>> and
 >>>
 >>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
 >>>
 >>> Defendant
 >>>
 >>> ORDER
 >>>
 >>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
 >>> December 14, 2015)
 >>>
 >>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
 >>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
 >>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
 >>> in its entirety.
 >>>
 >>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
 >>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
 >>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
 >>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
 >>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
 >>> he stated:
 >>>
 >>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
 >>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
 >>> You are your brother’s keeper.
 >>>
 >>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
 >>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
 >>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
 >>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
 >>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
 >>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
 >>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
 >>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
 >>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
 >>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
 >>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
 >>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
 >>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
 >>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
 >>> Police.
 >>>
 >>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
 >>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
 >>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
 >>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
 >>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
 >>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
 >>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
 >>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
 >>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
 >>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
 >>> is no order as to costs.
 >>>
 >>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
 >>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
 >>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
 >>>
 >>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
 >>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
 >>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
 >>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
 >>>
 >>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
 >>> most
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> ---------- Original message ----------
 >>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
 >>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
 >>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
 >>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
 >>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
 >>> dudes are way past too late
 >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
 >>>
 >>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
 >>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
 >>>
 >>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
 >>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
 >>>
 >>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
 >>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
 >>>
 >>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
 >>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
 >>>
 >>> Thank you,
 >>>
 >>> Merci ,
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
 >>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
 >>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
 >>> five years after he began his bragging:
 >>>
 >>> January 13, 2015
 >>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
 >>>
 >>> December 8, 2014
 >>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
 >>>
 >>> Friday, October 3, 2014
 >>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
 >>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
 >>>
 >>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
 >>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
 >>>
 >>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
 >>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
 >>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
 >>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
 >>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
 >>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
 >>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
 >>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
 >>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
 >>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
 >>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
 >>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
 >>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
 >>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
 >>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
 >>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
 >>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
 >>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
 >>> campaign of 2006.
 >>>
 >>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
 >>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
 >>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
 >>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
 >>>
 >>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
 >>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
 >>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
 >>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
 >>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
 >>>
 >>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
 >>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
 >>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
 >>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
 >>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
 >>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
 >>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
 >>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
 >>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
 >>>
 >>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
 >>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
 >>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
 >>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
 >>>
 >>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
 >>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
 >>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
 >>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
 >>>
 >>> Subject:
 >>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
 >>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
 >>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
 >>>
 >>> January 30, 2007
 >>>
 >>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
 >>>
 >>> Mr. David Amos
 >>>
 >>> Dear Mr. Amos:
 >>>
 >>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
 >>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
 >>>
 >>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
 >>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
 >>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
 >>>
 >>> Sincerely,
 >>>
 >>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
 >>> Minister of Health
 >>>
 >>> CM/cb
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
 >>>
 >>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
 >>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
 >>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
 >>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
 >>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
 >>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
 >>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
 >>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
 >>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
 >>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
 >>>
 >>> Dear Mr. Amos,
 >>>
 >>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
 >>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
 >>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
 >>>
 >>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
 >>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
 >>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
 >>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
 >>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
 >>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
 >>>
 >>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
 >>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
 >>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
 >>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
 >>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
 >>>
 >>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
 >>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
 >>>
 >>>  Sincerely,
 >>>
 >>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
 >>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
 >>> Traffic Services NCO
 >>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
 >>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
 >>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
 >>>
 >>>
 >>>
 >>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
 >>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
 >>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
 >>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
 >>> tel.: 506-457-7890
 >>> fax: 506-444-5224
 >>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
 >>>
 >>
 >>
 >> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
 >>
 >>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
 >>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
 >>>
 >>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
 >>> ilian.html
 >>>
 >>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
 >>>>
 >>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
 >>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
 >>>>
 >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
 >>>>
 >>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
 >>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
 >>>> cards?
 >>>>
 >>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
 >>>> 6
 >>>>
 >>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
 >>>>
 >>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
 >>>>
 >>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
 >>>>
 >>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
 >>>> Senator Arlen Specter
 >>>> United States Senate
 >>>> Committee on the Judiciary
 >>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
 >>>> Washington, DC 20510
 >>>>
 >>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
 >>>>
 >>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
 >>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
 >>>> raised in the attached letter.
 >>>>
 >>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
 >>>> tapes.
 >>>>
 >>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
 >>>>
 >>>> Very truly yours,
 >>>> Barry A. Bachrach
 >>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
 >>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
 >>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
 >>>>
 >>>
 >>
 >> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
 >>
 >>
 >> Sunday, 19 November 2017
 >> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
 >> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
 >> The Supreme Court
 >>
 >> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
 >>
 >>
 >> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
 >>
 >> Amos v. Canada
 >> Court (s) Database
 >>
 >> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
 >> Date
 >>
 >> 2017-10-30
 >> Neutral citation
 >>
 >> 2017 FCA 213
 >> File numbers
 >>
 >> A-48-16
 >> Date: 20171030
 >>
 >> Docket: A-48-16
 >> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
 >> CORAM:
 >>
 >> WEBB J.A.
 >> NEAR J.A.
 >> GLEASON J.A.
 >>
 >>
 >> BETWEEN:
 >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
 >> Respondent on the cross-appeal
 >> (and formally Appellant)
 >> and
 >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
 >> Appellant on the cross-appeal
 >> (and formerly Respondent)
 >> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
 >> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
 >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
 >>
 >> THE COURT
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> Date: 20171030
 >>
 >> Docket: A-48-16
 >> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
 >> CORAM:
 >>
 >> WEBB J.A.
 >> NEAR J.A.
 >> GLEASON J.A.
 >>
 >>
 >> BETWEEN:
 >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
 >> Respondent on the cross-appeal
 >> (and formally Appellant)
 >> and
 >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
 >> Appellant on the cross-appeal
 >> (and formerly Respondent)
 >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
 >>
 >> I.                    Introduction
 >>
 >> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
 >> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
 >> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
 >> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
 >> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
 >> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
 >> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
 >> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
 >> (Claim at para. 96).
 >>
 >> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
 >> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
 >> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
 >> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
 >> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
 >> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
 >> Prothontary’s Order).
 >>
 >>
 >> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
 >> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
 >> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
 >> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
 >> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
 >> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
 >>
 >>
 >> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
 >> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
 >> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
 >> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
 >> cross-appeal.
 >>
 >>
 >> II.                 Preliminary Matter
 >>
 >> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
 >> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
 >> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
 >> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
 >> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
 >> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
 >> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
 >> several judges but did not name those judges.
 >>
 >> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
 >> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
 >> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
 >> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
 >> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
 >> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
 >> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
 >> c. F-7:
 >>
 >>
 >> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
 >> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
 >> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
 >> Appeal.
 >> […]
 >>
 >> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
 >> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
 >> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
 >> […]
 >> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
 >> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
 >> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
 >>
 >> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
 >> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
 >> juges de la Cour fédérale.
 >>
 >>
 >> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
 >> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
 >> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
 >> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
 >> section.
 >> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
 >> that:
 >> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
 >> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
 >> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
 >> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
 >> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
 >> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
 >>
 >> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
 >> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
 >> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
 >> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
 >> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
 >> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
 >> matière civile et pénale.
 >> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
 >> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
 >> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
 >> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
 >> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
 >> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
 >>
 >> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
 >> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
 >> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
 >> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
 >> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
 >> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
 >>
 >>
 >> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
 >> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
 >> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
 >> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
 >> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
 >> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
 >> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
 >> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
 >> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
 >> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
 >> appeal book.
 >>
 >>
 >> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
 >> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
 >> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
 >> conflict in any matter related to him.
 >>
 >>
 >> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
 >> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
 >> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
 >> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
 >> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
 >> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
 >> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
 >> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
 >> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
 >> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
 >> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
 >> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
 >>
 >>
 >> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
 >> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
 >> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
 >> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
 >> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
 >> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
 >> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
 >> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
 >> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
 >> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
 >> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
 >> such judge had a conflict.
 >>
 >>
 >> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
 >> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
 >> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
 >> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
 >> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
 >> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
 >> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
 >> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
 >> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
 >> was a member of such firm.
 >>
 >>
 >> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
 >> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
 >> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
 >> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
 >> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
 >> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
 >> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
 >> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
 >> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
 >>
 >>
 >> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
 >> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
 >> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
 >> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
 >> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
 >> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
 >> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
 >> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
 >> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
 >> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
 >> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
 >> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
 >> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
 >> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
 >> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
 >> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
 >> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
 >> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
 >> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
 >> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
 >> apprehension of bias:
 >> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
 >> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
 >> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
 >> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
 >> reasonable apprehension of bias:
 >> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
 >> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
 >> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
 >> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
 >> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
 >> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
 >> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
 >> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
 >>
 >> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
 >> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
 >> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
 >> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
 >> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
 >> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
 >> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
 >> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
 >> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
 >> (4th) 193).
 >>
 >> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
 >> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
 >> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
 >> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
 >> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
 >> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
 >> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
 >> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
 >> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
 >> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
 >> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
 >> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
 >> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
 >> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
 >> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
 >>
 >>
 >> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
 >> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
 >> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
 >> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
 >> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
 >> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
 >> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
 >> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
 >> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
 >> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
 >>
 >>
 >> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
 >> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
 >> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
 >> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
 >> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
 >> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
 >> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
 >> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
 >> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
 >> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
 >> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
 >> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
 >> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
 >> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
 >> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
 >> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
 >>
 >>
 >> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
 >> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
 >> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
 >> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
 >> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
 >> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
 >> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
 >> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
 >>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
 >> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
 >> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
 >> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
 >> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
 >> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
 >> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
 >> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
 >> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
 >> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
 >> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
 >>
 >>
 >> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
 >> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
 >> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
 >> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
 >> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
 >> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
 >> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
 >> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
 >> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
 >> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
 >> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
 >> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
 >> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
 >> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
 >> events from over a decade ago.
 >> (emphasis added)
 >>
 >> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
 >> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
 >> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
 >> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
 >> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
 >> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
 >> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
 >> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
 >> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
 >> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
 >> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
 >> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
 >> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
 >> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
 >> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
 >> Webb hearing this appeal.
 >>
 >> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
 >> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
 >> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
 >> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
 >> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
 >>
 >> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
 >> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
 >> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
 >> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
 >> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
 >> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
 >> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
 >>
 >> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
 >> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
 >> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
 >> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
 >> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
 >> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
 >> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
 >> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
 >> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
 >> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
 >>
 >> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
 >> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
 >> to recuse himself.
 >>
 >> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
 >> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
 >> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
 >> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
 >> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
 >>
 >> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
 >> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
 >> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
 >> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
 >> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
 >> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
 >> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
 >> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
 >> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
 >> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
 >> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
 >> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
 >>
 >>
 >> III.               Issue
 >>
 >> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
 >> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
 >> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
 >> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
 >> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
 >>
 >> IV.              Analysis
 >>
 >> A.                 Standard of Review
 >>
 >> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
 >> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
 >> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
 >> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
 >> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
 >> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
 >> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
 >> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
 >> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
 >> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
 >> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
 >> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
 >> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
 >> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
 >> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
 >> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
 >> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
 >> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
 >> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
 >>
 >> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
 >> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
 >> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
 >> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
 >> interfere.
 >>
 >>
 >> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
 >> Prothonotary’s Order?
 >>
 >> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
 >> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
 >> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
 >>
 >> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
 >> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
 >> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
 >> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
 >> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
 >> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
 >> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
 >> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
 >> (…)
 >>
 >>
 >> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
 >> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
 >> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
 >> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
 >> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
 >> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
 >> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
 >> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
 >> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
 >> [footnotes omitted].
 >>
 >>
 >> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
 >> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
 >> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
 >> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
 >> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
 >> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
 >> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
 >> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
 >> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
 >> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
 >> para. 27).
 >>
 >>
 >> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
 >> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
 >> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
 >> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
 >>
 >>
 >> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
 >> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
 >> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
 >> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
 >>
 >> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
 >> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
 >>
 >> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
 >> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
 >>
 >> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
 >> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
 >> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
 >> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
 >> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
 >>
 >> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
 >> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
 >> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
 >> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
 >> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
 >>
 >> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
 >> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
 >> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
 >>
 >> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
 >> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
 >> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
 >> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
 >> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
 >> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
 >> of process…
>>
 >> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
 >> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
 >> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
 >> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
 >> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
 >> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
 >> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
 >> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
 >>
 >> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
 >> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
 >> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
 >>
 >> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
 >> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
 >> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
 >> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
 >> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
 >> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
 >> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
 >> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
 >> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
 >> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
 >> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
 >> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
 >> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
 >> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
 >> supporting a cause of action.
 >>
 >> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
 >> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
 >> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
 >> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
 >> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
 >> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
 >> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
 >> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
 >>
 >> V.                 Conclusion
 >> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
 >> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
 >> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
 >> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
 >> without leave to amend.
 >> "Wyman W. Webb"
 >> J.A.
 >> "David G. Near"
 >> J.A.
 >> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
 >> J.A.
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
 >> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
 >>
 >> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
 >> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
 >> DOCKET:
 >>
 >> A-48-16
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> STYLE OF CAUSE:
 >>
 >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
 >>
 >>
 >>
 >> PLACE OF HEARING:
 >>
 >> Fredericton,
 >> New Brunswick
 >>
 >> DATE OF HEARING:
 >>
 >> May 24, 2017
 >>
 >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
 >>
 >> WEBB J.A.
 >> NEAR J.A.
 >> GLEASON J.A.
 >>
 >> DATED:
 >>
 >> October 30, 2017
 >>
 >> APPEARANCES:
 >> David Raymond Amos
 >>
 >>
 >> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
 >> (on his own behalf)
 >>
 >> Jan Jensen
 >>
 >>
 >> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
 >>
 >> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
 >> Nathalie G. Drouin
 >> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
 >>
 >> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
 >>
 >
 >