https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Methinks many do agree that Aaron Wherry's opinions have removed all doubt as to who he is working for N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/10/andrew-scheers-mid-campaign-identity.html
#cdnpoli#nbpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/andrew-scheer-american-citizenship-2019-election-1.5308174
Scheer (we were told) is a guy like you, or least like someone you might know. In other words, he's not Justin Trudeau.
In political terms, that persona has its merits. But this is Scheer's first election as party leader and, before winning the leadership, he was not a particularly prominent public figure. As a result, his character and personal history had not been poked and prodded in any serious way by journalists and political rivals before this fall.
Too often over the last seven weeks, he has seemed to crumble on contact.
The Liberals took the first poke on Aug. 22, when they posted video of a speech Scheer gave in 2005 opposing same-sex marriage. Scheer didn't immediately step forward to address what he'd said 14 years ago. By the time he did talk about it with reporters, the Liberals had posted another video — this one raising questions about what Scheer had told anti-abortion activists during his campaign for Conservative leader.
When Scheer faced the television cameras on Aug. 30, he accused the Liberals of "dredging up divisive issues." But he didn't do much to account for what he'd said in 2005, and he struggled to clarify how he would handle matters related to abortion if he were prime minister now. A Scheer government, he said, would neither introduce nor support legislation related to abortion — but he stopped short of saying that Conservative backbenchers would be prevented from moving forward with abortion-related measures.
While questions about those issues were left to linger, others emerged.
First, there were the questions about whether he had misrepresented himself when he said he'd worked as an insurance broker. As it turned out, he had not been licensed as a broker, and he'd only worked in an insurance company's office for "six or seven months."
Asked by the CBC's Rosemary Barton this week whether he should just admit to being a "career politician," Scheer still insisted on the value of his apparently limited experience in the private sector.
During that same interview (part of CBC's Face to Face sessions with the major party leaders), Scheer again declined to elaborate or reflect on his opinion of same-sex marriage, or explain why he declines to march in Pride parades. (The parade-related questions for Scheer extended to the climate change strikes, which he also avoided last Friday.)
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
Reply to @Rick Wier: Methinks the Fat Lady ain't sung yet N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @FloryGoncalves and 49 others
Methinks many do agree that Aaron Wherry's opinions have removed all doubt as to who he is working for N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/10/andrew-scheers-mid-campaign-identity.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/andrew-scheer-american-citizenship-2019-election-1.5308174
Andrew Scheer's mid-campaign identity crisis
From citizenship to same-sex marriage to pre-politics resumés, Scheer is struggling to define his own image
Scheer (we were told) is a guy like you, or least like someone you might know. In other words, he's not Justin Trudeau.
In political terms, that persona has its merits. But this is Scheer's first election as party leader and, before winning the leadership, he was not a particularly prominent public figure. As a result, his character and personal history had not been poked and prodded in any serious way by journalists and political rivals before this fall.
Too often over the last seven weeks, he has seemed to crumble on contact.
Fast attacks, slow response
The Liberals took the first poke on Aug. 22, when they posted video of a speech Scheer gave in 2005 opposing same-sex marriage. Scheer didn't immediately step forward to address what he'd said 14 years ago. By the time he did talk about it with reporters, the Liberals had posted another video — this one raising questions about what Scheer had told anti-abortion activists during his campaign for Conservative leader.
When Scheer faced the television cameras on Aug. 30, he accused the Liberals of "dredging up divisive issues." But he didn't do much to account for what he'd said in 2005, and he struggled to clarify how he would handle matters related to abortion if he were prime minister now. A Scheer government, he said, would neither introduce nor support legislation related to abortion — but he stopped short of saying that Conservative backbenchers would be prevented from moving forward with abortion-related measures.
While questions about those issues were left to linger, others emerged.
First, there were the questions about whether he had misrepresented himself when he said he'd worked as an insurance broker. As it turned out, he had not been licensed as a broker, and he'd only worked in an insurance company's office for "six or seven months."
Asked by the CBC's Rosemary Barton this week whether he should just admit to being a "career politician," Scheer still insisted on the value of his apparently limited experience in the private sector.
During that same interview (part of CBC's Face to Face sessions with the major party leaders), Scheer again declined to elaborate or reflect on his opinion of same-sex marriage, or explain why he declines to march in Pride parades. (The parade-related questions for Scheer extended to the climate change strikes, which he also avoided last Friday.)
About the Author
Aaron Wherry has covered Parliament Hill since 2007 and has written for Maclean's, the National Post and the Globe and Mail. He is the author of Promise & Peril, a book about Justin Trudeau's years in power.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @albert gagnon: Who could trust a Yankee who spoke for the Queen for many years and didn't bother telling anyone that he should not?
David Raymond Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @charles harper: Methinks everybody would love to review Don Martin's article about now excepting Mr Butts and Mr Wherry N'esy Pas?
Obviously I read it
Don Martin: The knight in shining armour falls hard from his high horse
Published Friday, September 20, 2019
"Roughly ten years ago, I had lunch with then-backbench MP Justin Trudeau to pitch him on a warts-and-all biography.
The way I figured it, he was five years away from being Liberal leader and eight from being prime minister so a book could introduce him to voters without sugarcoating.
He listened politely before shrugging off the idea, saying he'd never be prime minister. He had too many secrets."
Obviously I read it
Don Martin: The knight in shining armour falls hard from his high horse
Published Friday, September 20, 2019
"Roughly ten years ago, I had lunch with then-backbench MP Justin Trudeau to pitch him on a warts-and-all biography.
The way I figured it, he was five years away from being Liberal leader and eight from being prime minister so a book could introduce him to voters without sugarcoating.
He listened politely before shrugging off the idea, saying he'd never be prime minister. He had too many secrets."
Bob Rialy
Reply to @Janice Vian: Taught pre law as well. He's so smart.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Bob Rialy: Methinks he should have read the lawsuit I filed in 2015 that I mentioned him in when Harper was the PM and the Yankee Scheer spoke for our Queen N'esy Pas?
Reply to @Laine Smith: the Russians must have hacked the editing room. Lmao
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Laine Smith: Me Too
Jon Smith
Scheer is on the right side of all the issues. Stand your ground Andrew. The CBC and Justin are in the weeds.
John James
Reply to @Jon Smith: i think you meant on the weed
Rick Wier
Reply to @Jon Smith: Andy, soon to be a footnote in history, wonder which Harper retread the conservatives will turn to next, you can have Kenney back any time you want, he is floundering in Alberta. Maybe go with Dougie?
Ivan Nano
Reply to @Jon Smith: He refuses to clearly say what he really believes: that the state should have control over women's bodies, the world was better when st8 white men made all the decisions, the LGBT people should be ostracized/shunned, that the poor are completely to blame for their situation, that the oil industry should have even a stronger control over Canada, , ...
So he has muddied to waters hoping people wouldn't notice the fraud behind the curtain.
So he has muddied to waters hoping people wouldn't notice the fraud behind the curtain.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jon Smith: Surely you jest
David Raymond Amos
Donald Patrick
Crisis? CBC is getting worse as the election draws closer. Real desperation. I guess they are afraid to lose their sugar-daddy........and they should be!!!
Csin Banat
Reply to @Donald Patrick: watch out the elephant in the room!
George Bath
Reply to @Donald Patrick: oh I see it's ok for Harper and scheer to mock another person but not the cbc?
where's my hypocrisy sharpie
where's my hypocrisy sharpie
Marq See
Reply to @Donald Patrick: he's struggling, so it is a crisis.
Kirk Miller
Reply to @csin banat: blkface...snc...nor man...there are many elements in the room
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Donald Patrick: Sometimes the truth is awful funny
Gerald Johnston
Wherry is a liberal hack,, fits in great at the cbc
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Gerald Johnston: Surprise Surprise Surprise
Only because of the criminally complicit MSM like CBC & CTV.
And how many were there on dressing up for a few parties?