Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Norman was told by Harper cabinet to talk to Quebec shipyard about leasing deal

$
0
0
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies





Replying to and 47 others
Methinks greedy lawyers drag out such things in order to keep on milking the matter for all it was worth in legal fees N'esy Pas? 


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/05/norman-was-told-by-harper-cabinet-to.html


 



https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mark-norman-supply-ship-davie-harper-mackay-1.5134548




Norman was told by Harper cabinet to talk to Quebec shipyard about leasing deal




1640 Comments


TWO TOP threads went missing before I could save them



Cap Harlock
You can't save the Liberals this time CBC!


David Amos  
Reply to @Cap Harlock: Yes they can Peter MacKay answered my lawsuit before polling day 2015 and everybody knows it 

David Amos 
Reply to @Cap Harlock: Gee I wonder where two of the top threads went already  

Jamie Gillis
Reply to @david mccaig: "Appears the cons were behind all of this all along."

And yet Mr. MacKay is happy to speak publicly about this. And The Admiral and his legal team said nothing about a lack of cooperation from former Conservative minister and took strips off the Liberals. Seems rather odd, don't you think. Well, if you're a Trudeau supporter.  


David Mccaig 
Reply to @David Amos:
David you and I know this happens all the time.


David Mccaig 
Reply to @David Amos:
Missing top comments, thats not at all thats been added or taken. 













 
Reul Boivin
McKay was on Question Period yesterday and said he talked extensively with Norman's lawyer over a year ago. The liberals were withholding information that cleared Norman.Terrible stuff.
 
Mark (Junkman) George
Reply to @Reul Boivin:

Just more "honest and transparent" government. Thanks JT for showing us how its done. 


Bill Dixon 
Reply to @Reul Boivin: Did he say whether or not he'd volunteered that information to the prosecution? Because if he hadn't, why not? Why, as a former Minister of Justice, just stand by and watch this train wreck chug down the tracks?

My bet is that the Conservatives selectively provided the information to the defence, in hopes that eventually it would all blow up in the face of the Liberals. No mind how much time, money, and resources at Justice Canada were wasted.


David Amos
Reply to @Reul Boivin: "McKay was on Question Period yesterday and said he talked extensively with Norman's lawyer over a year ago"

Ask yourself why she held back for so long 


 
Mathieu Fortier
Reply to @David Amos: How is the investigation her responsibility here?

Don Smith 
Reply to @Bill Dixon:

I'm wondering why Norman's Defence team didn't disclose this last year before he was formally removed from his post. Hell! Why didn't Norman??


Phil K'Mee 
Reply to @David Amos:

Because smart defence lawyers do not reveal their ace in the hole until the time of maximum effect; like, say, right after the government team of lawyers is giving their carefully rehearsed version of events. 

 
David Amos 
Reply to @Mathieu Fortier: There was nothing for her to investigate She already knew the truth because MacKay told her

David Amos 
Reply to @Phil K'Mee: Methinks greedy lawyers do such things in order to keep on milking the matter for all it was worth in legal fees N'esy Pas? 


Norman was told by Harper cabinet to talk to Quebec shipyard about leasing deal

'Mark Norman was acting ... with cabinet authority,' says ex-defence minister Peter MacKay


Vice-Admiral Mark Norman walks with his lawyers Marie Henein (right) and Christine Mainville as they leave court in Ottawa on Wednesday, May 8, 2019. (Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS) 

 
Vice-Admiral Mark Norman not only had the blessing of the former Conservative cabinet to deal with a Quebec shipyard, he was authorized to speak with it directly in the run-up to the signing of a $668 million leasing contract, CBC News has learned.

The revelation raises further questions about the handling of the RCMP's investigation into allegations the military's former second-in-command leaked sensitive cabinet information about the contract.

It also peels back the curtain on some of the thinking that may have gone into the Crown's decision to stay the single breach-of-trust charge against Norman, who at one time commanded the Royal Canadian Navy.


"Mark Norman was acting within his authority and with cabinet authority," Peter MacKay, who held both the justice and defence portfolios under then-prime minister Stephen Harper, told CBC News.

"Having taken the decision that we did via cabinet committee, and therefore giving Mark Norman the green light to proceed, he would have had [the] authority to speak to the Davie shipyard."


Former federal defence minister Peter MacKay: "Yes, (Mark Norman) was very often speaking to Davie shipyard." (CBC)

The vast majority of the 12 alleged leaks of cabinet information that were the focus of Norman's court case took place under the former Conservative government, which scrambled in the run-up to the 2015 election to secure a temporary supply ship for the navy over the opposition of some parts of the public service and the military.

It isn't clear whether the Mounties or the Crown knew before laying the breach-of-trust charge that Norman had clear marching orders from the Harper government.

That information would have been contained in a pile of Conservative-era cabinet documents that the current Liberal government fought to keep secret.

"The RCMP didn't have it, and didn't look for it," said Norman's lawyer Marie Henein last week at a news conference after the Crown stayed the charge against her client.

"I don't think they were suppressing anything. I think the full picture of how these very complicated contracts are negotiated, and what the life of this particular contract was ... It was far more complicated, far more sophisticated and was not completely looked at."

The RCMP last week defended the thoroughness of its investigation. When contacted by CBC News on Monday about the latest information, the federal police force declined to comment.

"We are not in a position to provide further comments on the matter," said the unsigned email statement from the RCMP.

'Full faith in our institutions'


In the Commons on Monday, Justice Minister David Lametti turned aside opposition attacks and persistent allegations of political interference in the case by expressing "full faith in our institutions," including the Mounties.

"The charges in question were laid by the [director of public prosecutions]," he said. "The process was managed by the DPP and the stay was decided by the prosecution service. Evidence was gathered by the RCMP, turned over to the prosecution. DPP and prosecutor have both stated there was no government interference or contact."

The case against Norman, who was relieved last year as the vice chief of the defence staff, came apart last week when the Crown said it did not have a reasonable chance of conviction based upon new information submitted in a brief by the defence team.

The lead prosecutor refused to say what that information was, conceding it was new evidence that the prosecution had not seen before.

Since then, three former Conservative cabinet ministers have acknowledged they gave interviews to Norman's lawyers, providing details and context regarding was going on when the Harper government approved the lease of the MV Asterix from the Davie shipyard in Levis, Que.
The leasing plan was opposed by federal shipbuilding and defence bureaucrats, who wanted to either compete the lease proposal with other shipyards or wait and force the navy to make do until the eventual delivery of permanent supply ships, expected some time in the 2020s.

The Harper cabinet decided to do an end-run around those opposed to the short-term lease — including the former chief of the defence staff, the now-retired Gen. Tom Lawson.

MacKay said Norman "had a unique and important role to play in this procurement, which was made on an emergency basis."

He said Norman acted as so-called "super project manager" tasked with delivering the lease deal.

"Cabinet would have given Mark Norman and the defence department the authority to move forward on this procurement. So, yes, he was very often speaking to Davie shipyard," MacKay said.

About the Author


Murray Brewster
Defence and security
Murray Brewster is senior defence writer for CBC News, based in Ottawa. He has covered the Canadian military and foreign policy from Parliament Hill for over a decade. Among other assignments, he spent a total of 15 months on the ground covering the Afghan war for The Canadian Press. Prior to that, he covered defence issues and politics for CP in Nova Scotia for 11 years and was bureau chief for Standard Broadcast News in Ottawa.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Trending Articles