https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
![]()
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/province-fredericton-shooting-costs-1.4941826
![]()
![stephen blunston]()
stephen blunston
![David Amos]()
![cheryl wright]()
![David Amos]()
David Amos
![Marc Martin]()
![David R. Amos]()
![Marc Martin]()
![David R. Amos]()
![David Amos]()
David Amos
![Marc Martin]()
![David R. Amos]()
![Johnny Horton]()
Johnny Horton
![]()
Public Safety Minister Carl Urquhart said Tuesday the province will help the City of Fredericton pay for the costs related to the Aug. 10 shooting of two police officers and two civilians. (CBC)
---
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
ashley.beaudin@gnb.cam >. Merci!
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gauvin, Serge (SNB)"<Serge.Gauvin@snb.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:49 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am out of the office. Please contact Patrick Windle at
patrick.windle@snb.caP >
Je suis absent du bureau. Veuillez contacter Patrick Windle à
patrick.windle@snb.caP >
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Cormier, Donna (JAG/JPG)"<donna.cormier@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:15:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yp John Logan I just called
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I'm away from the office until December 12, 2018. Should your matter
require immediate attention, please contact Susan Butler at (506)
453-6309.
Je suis à l'extérieur du bureau jusqu'au 12 décembre 2018. Si votre
matière est urgente, veuillez communiquer avec Susan Butler au (506)
453-6309.
Merci / Thank you
Donna Cormier
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:49:18 -0400
Subject: Yp John Logan I just called
To: donna.cormier@gnb.ca, John.Logan@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 02:04:52 -0400
Subject: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong Organization
commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
To: Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
"carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Stephane.vaillancourt"
<Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, "michael.comeau"<michael.comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Norman.Sabourin"<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
"gerry.lowe"<gerry.lowe@gnb.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"
<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
<dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ethics-ethique ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:22:30 -0500
Subject: Re: Re My many calls to the Calgary Police Dept about their
client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This will confirm that we have received your enquiry and it has been
placed in a priority sequence.
******************************
La présente confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre requête et qu'elle
a été placée en ordre de priorité de réception.
Thank you/Merci
Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle
Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada
73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101
RCMP Mailstop #58/
GRC Arrêt Postal #58
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0R2
1-866-206-0195 (off/bur)
ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
"Strong Ethics, Strong Organization"
« Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide »
This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is
loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be
reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the
originator."
« Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis
en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié
ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 23:39:28 -0400
Subject: Re My many calls to the Calgary Police Dept about their
client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
To: patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>, "philip.bryden"
<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Glen Canning
<grcanning@gmail.com>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
pol4982 <pol4982@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
city.manager@calgary.ca, lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca,
Glenda.Cole@calgary.ca, Shannon.Belvedere@calgary.ca,
Brian.Graham@calgary.ca, David.Lewis@calgary.ca,
David.Mercer@calgary.ca, Stephen.Wheeler@calgary.ca,
Douglas.Merchant@calgary.ca, mike lokken
<mike.lokken@albertaicenorth.
<Mike.Lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
pol9600@calgarypolice.ca, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, Seand@wsba.org, Saran@wsba.org,
mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>, douge@wsba.org, "serge.rousselle"
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, mrichard
<mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"martin.gaudet"<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
misandry.happens@gmail.com, thomas@1000notes.com, paulal@wsba.org,
Questions@wsba.org, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:45:21 -0400
Subject: Attn Sean Davis we just talked about the ethics of Washington
State Bar Association and their friend Patrick Doran
To: Seand@wsba.org, Saran@wsba.org, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
douge@wsba.org, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, mrichard
<mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Paula Littlewood
Executive Director
206-733-5950 | paulal@wsba.org
voicemail only
Sean Davis
General Counsel, Director of the Office of General Counsel
206-733-5944 | Seand@wsba.org
Sara Niegowski
Chief Communications & Outreach Officer
206-733-5930 | Saran@wsba.org
Jean McElroy
Chief Regulatory Counsel, Director of Regulatory Services Department
206-727-8277 | jeanm@wsba.org
Doug Ende
Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Director of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel
206-727-8275 | douge@wsba.org
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:16:05 -0400
Subject: Now I have some questions about the ethics of the Washington
State Bar Association and their friend Patrick Doran
To: paulal@wsba.org, Questions@wsba.org, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ethics-ethique
<ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"misandry.happens"<misandry.happens@gmail.com>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Monday, 4 June 2018
Now I have some questions about the ethics of the Washington State Bar
Association and their friend Patrick Doran
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Misandry Today Admits To Sharing The Mad Shangi's Dox
1,581 views
Cognitive Thought
Streamed live on Mar 14, 2018
Joining me is VampKandy & Sinatra.
9 Comments
David Amos
2 months ago
The RCMP can bet our thin Canadian dimes to fat Yankee petrodollars
that I saved this video and the FBI know why
David Amos
2 months ago
I hear you people talking about Glen Canning and I dealing with your
pal Patrick Doran you can bet I contacted the cops AGAIN
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Update from Washington State Bar Association
9 views
Mad Shangi
Published on Jun 4, 2018
I got a follow up from the Washington State Bar Association. The
matter is closed, and no further action will be taken. It's
disappointing, but not surprising.
https://encyclopediadramatica.
https://www.wsba.org/about-
Our Mission
The mission of the Washington State Bar Association is to serve the
public and the members of the Bar, to ensure the integrity of the
legal profession, and to champion justice.
The Washington State Bar Association is part of the judicial branch,
exercising a governmental function authorized by the Washington
Supreme Court to license the state’s more than 38,000 legal
professionals. The WSBA both regulates lawyers under the authority of
the Court and serves its members as a professional association — all
without public funding.
As a regulatory agency, the WSBA administers the bar admission
process, including the bar exam; provides record-keeping and licensing
functions; and administers the professional discipline system. As a
professional association, the WSBA also provides continuing legal
education for attorneys, in addition to numerous other educational and
member-services and opportunities to advance professionally.
Governance and Leadership
The Board of Governors is WSBA's governing body charged with
determining the general policies of the Bar and approving its annual
budget. The Board consists of the president, president-elect, and
immediate past president and members elected from each Congressional
District and three at-large positions.
The Board of Governors elects the president-elect of the Bar and
selects the executive director.
Questions? Contact our knowledgeable Service Center representatives or
key support contacts. We are here to assist you 8 a.m.–5 p.m. Monday
through Friday.
Phone
Toll-free: 800-945-9722
Local: 206-443-9722
Email
Questions@wsba.org
Fax
206-727-8316 – Main
206-727-8325 – Office of Disciplinary Counsel
206-727-8313 – Regulatory Services, Licensing and Admissions
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:25:46 -0400
Subject: YO "Misandry Today" your pal "Thomas" or anyone else can go
to the 52 minute mark of this hearing held about 2 weeks before Barry
Winters was finally arrested and listen to me mention Patrick Doran's
malicous work within Encylopedia Dramatic
To: Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, thomas <thomas@1000notes.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor
<themayor@calgary.ca>
https://archive.org/details/
Then his fellow Trolls should check Doran's work in ED
https://encyclopediadramatica.
Nobody can deny that he provides the entire text of my lawsuit srcoll
down to Paragraph 75 to reqd the following statement AGAIN Do you not
see Doran and Wnters named???
75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
“Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
Winters and his blogs.
BTW the DavidRayAmos Troll attacking using my name is not me. I was
not aware of Doran in ED until Barry Winters blogged about it
I suspect it was the same Troll who created the ED webpage that you
used to source your bullshit about me from
The reason I CC'd the universe and many cops in particular is because
I am filing a lawsuit about the shit.
In a nutshell Doran is a shill for the Calgary cops Get it yet?
On 3/31/18, Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> Thank you for directing your email to me specifically so I can respond.
>
> Please do not take my lack of response to your prior emails as a form of
> disrespect, its not. However, after reading your prior emails, I was unable
> to decipher who your message was specifically directed it.
>
> Was there something specific you wanted to discuss? Or were you just
> notifying me on the links and info included in this most recent email?
>
> Also, is there a reason the known universe is CC'd?
>
> Again, I'm not being disrespectful, but I know very little about you and
> your history with Patrick Doran, other than there was some sort of feud.
>
> Can you provide me some history and context?
>
> Respectfully,
> DDJ
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:37 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>> email-suit.html
>>
>>
>> Saturday, 31 March 2018
>> Yo "Misandry Today" does this email suit a noname Yankee paralegal's
>> demand of me that he quickly deleted?
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>>
>> LEGALLY PWNED: MISANDRY TODAY (DDJ)
>> 99 views
>> 15 1 Share
>>
>> Mad Shangi
>> Published on Mar 29, 2018
>>
>>
etc etc etc
https://www.youtube.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The DDJ Drama Stream Extravaganza #DramaLivesMatter
962 views
79
7
Share
Save
Cognitive Thought
Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018
DDJ has a Yes and No answer to a basic principle and conflates it with
an assumed argument.
If you like what you see, please Subscribe! (:
⚙Support My Work⚙
Streamlabs: https://streamlabs.com/
PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/
Maker Support: https://www.makersupport.com/
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/
Merchandise: http://tee.pub/lic/ZH_vh4ESxHg
⚙Social Media⚙
Twitter: https://twitter.com/anonymous_
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/
Minds: https://www.minds.com/
Gab: https://gab.ai/Cog_Thought
Discord: https://discord.gg/ryrKPCR
⚙Patrons⚙
Scott Mraz: https://www.youtube.com/c/
DerWeisePanda: https://twitter.com/
Joseph Yhu: http://www.twitter.com/
Bearing: https://www.youtube.com/
Olenska: https://twitter.com/
CatherineAquitaine: https://www.minds.com/
Sheepalicious: https://twitter.com/
Shareyourworldwide: https://minds.com/
Joseph Palka: https://www.youtube.com/user/
Deodora Langerrud: https://www.facebook.com/
BobTheTrollKing: https://www.youtube.com/
The Gayest Person on Patreon: https://www.youtube.com/
Hoody: https://twitter.com/HoodyGeek
ShortBusMooner: https://twitter.com/
Chrome Fotter: https://www.youtube.com/
Occam's Razor: https://www.youtube.com/
A Very Dead Horse: https://www.youtube.com/
Thomas Schnadelbach
GarbageHumanTJM64
Clackston Biaar
Drauka Grissa
Paulie J
Debra J O'Connor
Static Citizen
Robert Etgeton III
Matt Studwell
Agent_R_Patriarchy
David Berryman
(To all my Patrons without links, let me know what social link you'd like here.)
Thank you all for your support!
More than anything though, whatever you do with your day, enjoy yourself. (:
Category
People & Blogs
14 Comments
David Amos
Add a public comment...
David Amos
David Amos
8 months ago
Clearly by your own words you perverts know that I contacted the cops
in Canada, the USA and the UK about your slander and criminal libel.
Please do go ahead and study my blog and discuss it on one of your oh
so informative livestreams. Trust that you will find this comment at
the top of this blog in a heartbeat along with some selected comments
from your live chat last night while your discussion bored me enough
to send me to la la land.
Feel free to check my work about YOUR obvious malice towards me.
http://davidraymondamos3.
That said. I have no false illusions about justice. However I also
know I can make you perverts rather infamous as I bust ya in front of
your friends. We all know the corrupt cops in the UK who are more
concerned about Nazi Pugs will never act within the scope of their
employment just like the RCMP and the FBI never did. Everybody knows
its because of my lawsuits in the USA and Canada. However the RCMP
and I have been at war since 1982 when Coggy Baby was no doubt
shitting yellow.
My contact info is always on the bottom of the lawsuits and made
public by the courts. Hence I have no problem whatsoever telling the
world who I am in a sick little Troll's YouTube channel that may go
"Poof" tomorrow if I decide to pick up the phone contact Google's
lawyers personally. If you dummies had bothered to notice I sent their
top lawyer in the USA and Canada the same email the "Thomas"
chickenshit makes fun of.
What if I decide to waste some more of precious time on Trolls and
figure out who you are? What id I then "dox" you dudes and DDJ as
well on the Internet before I name you all within a paragraph or two
in my next lawsuit against the Crown? If you had bothered to read
paragraph 75 of a lawsuit NOT about cows (Federal Court File No
T-1557-15) you would have seen that I did it with Patty Baby Doran
and his butt buddy Barry Winters in 2015. Correct? My my won't that be
fun for the RCMP and their shills when I do it again particularly
after Barry Winters was arrested and then purportedly shit the bed
last year?
Please feel free to tell us more in your next livestream just how much
fun you perverted Trolls are still having with me. Rest assured that
I will save every word.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
5 Campbell St
Apohaqui, NB
902 800 0369
Never forget that you nasty noname little bastards picked this fight with me.
Ragnok Ulfbhert
Ragnok Ulfbhert
8 months ago (edited)
The "Somewhere in the pooblic space" over the rainbow spoof has to be
a song Cog. It will be glorious lol
4
Saoirse
Saoirse
8 months ago
See I knew there was a reason I found myself wide awake at 4 am. I
have a 2 and a half hour podcast to catch up on.
3
Admiral Thunderbunny
Admiral Thunderbunny
8 months ago
Can't we just agree that DDJ is just a:
Transitional
Amalgamation of
Recycled
Detritus
3
The Badman
The Badman
8 months ago
Ddj is a grandad probably in his 50s just so you know cog
2
John Brown
John Brown
8 months ago
Grandpas don't behave the way he does. Absolutely not.
Mad Shangi
Mad Shangi
8 months ago
DDJ exposed for breaking the law. https://www.youtube.com/watch?
MGTOW REVEALED
MGTOW REVEALED
8 months ago
Turd flinging monkey just got terminated for community guidelines.
Celestina Monkey and Misandry Today DDJ is next :) All MGTOWS are
going down, MGTOW is cancer, worse than feminism. Good riddance.
1
The Badman
The Badman
8 months ago
Did Katherine lamp show up? What happened I musta missed a stream
1
CaptainAwesomesworld
CaptainAwesomesworld
8 months ago
The Badman dollars to doughnuts kat lamp is a ddj sock puppet
1
The Badman
The Badman
8 months ago
nah, she was on his just a stream stream, she is just a senile looney old bag.
John Brown
John Brown
8 months ago
Hey Cog, you should know that DDJ has said multiple times that he's an
orphan. Doesn't that count as coming from a broken home? Oh wait, his
statements don't apply to him, my bad.
Mad Shangi
Mad Shangi
8 months ago
You might appreciate this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Live chat replay is on. Messages that appeared when the stream was
live will show up here.
David Amos
Are Coggy and Patty Baby having a bad day? Say Hoka Hey to your cop
pals for me will ya?
David Amos
You should know Patty Baby Everybody with two clues between their
ears must have figured out that you are a shill for the corrupt
Calgary cops
David Amos
That why Barry Winters got arrested but you did not Correct?
David Amos
You tell these fools I sued about cows and they believe you? Too too
funny indeed
David Amos
Perhaps your pals should read paragraph 75 of the lawsuit they make
fun of to see what is said of Trolls and the names of Patty Baby Doran
and Barry Winters EH?
lennon 41
WE THE CHAT
Doku HL SD
#CowGang
lennon 41
RESERVE THE RIGHT
Mad Shangi
Is he insinuating that people who are commenting on his videos now
are part of a conspiracy?!
Doku HL SD
the age of man is over the age of cow is now
Jorge mackensen
Get your cowsuits and tin foil hat on, we're gonna stalk some cows today......
Unholy Mole
the cownt down to destruction
Nightbot
⚙Support The Channel⚙ https://streamlabs.com/
DataWasteland
AND MILK IT FOR ALL ITS WORTH
Doku HL SD
madox cow disease
lennon 41
FUCKIN NORMIES
Jacob gulf city Navo
I want to punch ddj in the face
DataWasteland
IRRITABLE BULL SYNDROME
Doku HL SD
cownflicting arguments
Jimmie The Rustle
I don't think DDJ is observing the same reality as the rest of us.
lennon 41
TOWER 7 THAT HOE
Toothless Cowboy
Inifinte Bull Shite #MADoxcow ?
Doku HL SD
#MADoxcow
Doku HL SD
cow gang is on the rise
DataWasteland
ITS THE NEW MOOOOVMENT
Jacob gulf city Navo
Olenska I’m going to bed goodnight
Doku HL SD
MOOOOOO
Mad Shangi
Something tells me this April 1st conversation ain't happening. LOL!
Doku HL SD
MOOOOOOvement
Mad Shangi
He's got a bitch made voice.
Jorge mackensen
DDQ= Drama Dairy Queen
Doku HL SD
moooooove up dat drama
Doku HL SD
we're all from broken pastures
CThomas The Peasant
@Olenska Did I miss much of the (((autism)))?
Nightbot
⚙Support The Channel⚙ https://streamlabs.com/
Doku HL SD
🐄🐄🐄🐄🐄
Mad Shangi
Traumatic like the way his kids got fondled by his ex's boyfriend?
CThomas The Peasant
@Olenska Is it Moo-ving?
Jorge mackensen
I'm disturbed by the amount of Udders on the DDQ show mooooooooooooo🐮
CThomas The Peasant
@Olenska So I've herd
Doku HL SD
we have a cow gang problem on the internet we need a new moovement to
combats its
Catherine Aquitaine
Hello everyone!
Mad Shangi
I think @David Amos gave up on us. LOL!
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:47:21 -0400
Subject: Re My many calls to the City of Calgary this week about the
Calgary Police Dept their client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
To: themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, city.manager@calgary.ca,
lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca, Glenda.Cole@calgary.ca,
Shannon.Belvedere@calgary.ca, Brian.Graham@calgary.ca,
David.Lewis@calgary.ca, David.Mercer@calgary.ca,
Stephen.Wheeler@calgary.ca, Douglas.Merchant@calgary.ca, mike lokken
<mike.lokken@albertaicenorth.
<Mike.Lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol9600@calgarypolice.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Nobody should deny the fact that I tried to reason with you people for
ten long years.
Yesterday I had heard enough from people playing dumb.
Here is the email I promised to send to your lawyers
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:16:30 -0400
Subject: Re: DDJ's Inferno: Responding to MadShangi's Campaign of Harassment
To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
"Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Scorched Earth = Butt Hurt
59 views
Mad Shangi
Published on Mar 12, 2018
What happens when you trigger a sex-doll peddlin' fake MGTOW? Well,
you get doxxed of course.
On 3/12/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> DDJ's Inferno: Responding to MadShangi's Campaign of Harassment
> 2,412 views
> Misandry Today
> Published on Mar 11, 2018
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:24:02 -0400
Subject: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt Cops and their
clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in BC, Dean Roger
Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran in Alberta, Encyclopedia Dramatica,
the Baconfat Legacy etc and Section 300 of the Canadian Crimial Code
To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
"philip.bryden"<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
<ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
"bill.clark"<bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca>
<Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
<ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
danadurnford <danadurnford@hotmail.com>, Dean Ray
<deanrogerray@hotmail.com>, maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>,
xtofury <xtofury@gmail.com>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
"don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, smcintyre
<smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
"david.eby.mla"<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, pol7163
<pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, police <police@halifax.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, police <police@fredericton.ca>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<grcanning@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
https://encyclopediadramatica.
http://baconfatlegacy.
The Baconfat Legacy
Blog Archive
• ▼ 2018 (1)
o ▼ January (1)
Glen Canning: Exploiter of Rehtaeh Parsons
• ▼ 2017 (11)
o ▼ December (1)
Disturbed Troll Glen Canning Leaves Even More Angr...
o ▼ October (10)
The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Am...
The New Baconfat Mission Statement
Archive: Glen Canning and Leah Parsons on Stage
Butt-Hurt Troll Glen Canning Posts A Comment
The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos (1980's s...
The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos
The Musical PWNage of Glen Canning
RIP BARRY WINTERS: Don't Let Free Speech Die With ...
Glen Canning: Psychopath
Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
Tuesday, 24 October 2017
Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
Welcome to The Baconfat Legacy - started in tribute to Mr. Barry
Winters: a controversial blogger, opinionated troll and Edmonton
resident, who sadly passed away. Before his passing, his blog was the
subject of hate crime charges due to the offensive politically
incorrect nature of Barry's writing. I will continue this blog in that
tradition. You are going to read words like "faggot,""nigger,"
"kike,""spick,""nip,""bitch,""cunt,""whore,""slut,""wop,"
"midget," and anything else that just happens to pop into my head,
because like Barry I'm an equal opportunity offender. And if you don't
like the aggressive, in your face, deliberately offensive nature of
this blog well you can suck my fucking dick. Go tell David Amos and
Glen Canning to go fuck themselves too. Alert your local authorities
and go bitch to your friends in the government, because the Baconfat
is back baby.
And in the interest of free speech I hope you fuckers try to shut me
down, because I will fight you. If you don't like this blog, then
don't read it. Go read the fucking Babysitter's Club for all I care.
But any bullshit trumped up charges you throw at me will make my day.
Because the day we start locking people up for talking shit in a
fucking blog, is the day that fascism rules. C'yall in court,
motherfuckers.
Posted by Mad Shangi at 00:24
http://www.canadianlawlist.
Glenda E. Cole
City Solicitor
Called to the bar: 1988 (AB); Q.C.2013 (AB)
Phone: 403-268-5182
City Solicitor's Office
Law Dept., 12th Flr., 800 Macleod Trail S.E.
PO Box 2100, Stn. M
Calgary, Alberta T2P 2M5
Phone: 403-268-2441
Fax: 403-268-4634
Email: lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca
Listed Individuals
Shannon C. Belvedere
Mary Ann Bendfeld
Jocelyn J. Caldwell
Glenda E. Cole
C. Tat Fan
Jill S. Floen
James T. Floyd
Paul Frank
Leila J. Gosselin
Brian C. Graham
Andrea Hankins-Palmer
Amanda Hart
T. E. Haufe
B. R. Inlow
Denise C. Jakal
Lori L. Kerr
My-Le Lai
David J. Lewis
Richard Loomer
Lesia Luciuk
Ola Malik
David E. Mercer
Douglas D. Merchant
Hanna Oh
Lise Olsen
Carol L. Reesor
Marnie B. Rusen
Colleen N. Sinclair
Tina Squire
R. Shawn Swinn
Stephen B. Wheeler
Trudy Wobeser
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
72. The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary,
Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the
Plaintiff ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had
researched Byron Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of
Justice in late 2006 has not been made public. More importantly the
lawyer who has been the MP representing Fundy Royal for the past
eleven years and that the former Minister of Public Safety
acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about Byron Prior that
contained the entire text of his website before the writ was dropped
for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email exchange
has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on the
Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed.
The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find
published on the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman”
character named Max published within the YouTube domain. It was an
interview of Byron Prior as he was protesting on the grounds of the
House of Commons the day after the Prime Minister was found in
“Contempt of Parliament” and his most contemptuous minority mandate
became a matter of history. His majority mandate is history and the
Plaintiff seeks relief.
73. The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public
Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia
claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had
several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons
during 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the
Plaintiff but he does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the
same street as the Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is
being prosecuted by the Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It
is unlikely he would move far from the city soon. If the Crown wishes
to argue this complaint Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc should be
summoned to testify about what they know of this matter and of their
being illegally barred from parliament properties as well. Failing
that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of documentation
including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide byway of
digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the concerns
of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the
Plaintiff and many others.
74. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was
before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff
that she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and
while visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by
the RCMP and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert
area of Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency
offices of the Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded
her emails to and from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former
Premier and the office of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff
to support her. The Plaintiff introduced himself to all the
aforementioned parties in order to assist Robin Reid and they were
ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff discovered he could no longer
assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the actions of Neo Nazis who
supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP and many other law
enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well aware of the
reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people in any
fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis
are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown
but their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.
75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
“Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
Winters and his blogs.
76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up
on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor
Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their
actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal
gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to
politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters
responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June
of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry
Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his
published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That
fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received
any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the
EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime
Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while
continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to
university students and anyone else who will listen to them
particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every
word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic
cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a
lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He
considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates
that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of
cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court
of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore
other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work
of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and
WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the
EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking
him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and
to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the
anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the
questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of
Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the
law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations.
78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified
himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a
follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for
certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff
has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of
time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone
number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior.
The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable
fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss
the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and
the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA
and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know
that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend to be anyone by
having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP or the EPS)
appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows commercial
programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former
assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to
jail because of robo calls.
79. The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions
to sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring
his complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was
trying to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to
pull the same trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that
if the EPS managed to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s
signature then it would delay his lawsuit because the EPS could claim
that his complaint under investigation and that the EPS could say
nothing about it until the matter had concluded. The Plaintiff
informed the EPS that anyone could use an anonymous phone number and
claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it should do so from an
identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just like he does. In
fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous calls for many
years and the police claimed they could do nothing because the
malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted
ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the
harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal
barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada.
80. The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet
harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of
two Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and
promptly ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends
were being much harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the
RCMP in NB created a YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to
catch a local arsonist. As soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about
eleven incidents of arson on his friend’s farm in the same area the
Plaintiff and his friend were attacked by many Troll’s within the
Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only laughed at the obvious
malice that they were publishing for a year without attempting to
moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the RCMP
YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of
members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of “Organized
Crime”. The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments
within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand
to a local office of the RCMP. Once the Plaintiff had a conversation
with a member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s
complaint, the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and
said nothing further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most
of the comments digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and
the RCMP. Years later the Crown stayed the “Organized Crime” charges
against the Tingleys and a publication ban was placed on their
concerns about malicious prosecution. The matter was put before the
Supreme Court of Canada Rodney Tingley, et al. v. Her Majesty the
Queen SCC Docket no. 34107 and the Plaintiff had no idea of any
outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak with some of the Tingleys
and they admitted to knowing about him and his common concerns with
the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have advised them not
to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same holds true
with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another German who
moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting against
them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s
easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as
they attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of
lawsuit.
81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
Winters was in fact o...
[Message clipped] View entire message
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
After my calls to the offices of the Attorney General and particularly the latest Public Safety Minister Carl Urquhart yesterday the RCMP and many lawyers know Fat Fred City and the province are about to get sued BIGTIME
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/province-fredericton-shooting-costs-1.4941826
Province promises to help Fredericton with shooting costs
12 Comments
stephen blunston
so I guess when the city made our budget they were lying to us , as they knew were getting money from the feds waiving rcmp costs, province says it will help yet the Fredericton municipality states they nees to increase taxes and fees to cover these cost .. I guess the city getting like all levels of government looking for any excuse to raise taxers for another money grab
David Amos
@stephen blunston YUP
cheryl wright
@stephen blunston same as when they cried boo hoo it cost the city/province so much because of flooding this spring. they stopped boohoo-ing when it was noted that the feds paid their cost. every politician; every councilor; every mayor needs a lesson in truth telling, ethics and economics.
David Amos
"Ericson said the RCMP costs could be part of all three areas of shooting costs, and he doesn't yet know how much the waived bills will actually save the city."
I wonder if the RCMP has found my Harley and the Yankee wiretaps yet
I wonder if the RCMP has found my Harley and the Yankee wiretaps yet
Marc Martin
@David Amos
Who cares....
Who cares....
David R. Amos
@Marc Martin Obviously the RCMP
Marc Martin
@David R. Amos
But again...who cares...
But again...who cares...
David R. Amos
@Marc Martin The FBI as well
David Amos
Trust that after my calls to the offices of the Attorney General and particularly the latest Public Safety Minister Carl Urquhart yesterday the RCMP and many lawyers know that Fat Fred City and the province are about to get sued BIGTIME
Marc Martin
@David Amos
Cry me a river...
Cry me a river...
David R. Amos
@Marc Martin Methinks you are the one who should be crying to your lawyer about now N'esy Pas?
Johnny Horton
Ridiculous.
Cry wolf, gouge the taxpayers, and then keep the money when it isn’t needed.
Cry wolf, gouge the taxpayers, and then keep the money when it isn’t needed.
Province promises to help Fredericton with shooting costs
Shootings will cost the City of Fredericton about $4M in the next two years
The City of Fredericton is getting help paying for the costs associated with the fatal shootings of two police officers and two civilians on Aug. 10.
During question period Tuesday, Fredericton North MLA Stephen Horsman asked if the Progressive Conservative government was going to do anything to help the city avoid debt.
Minister of Public Safety Carl Urquhart said the government has met with RCMP and "the cost of RCMP policing to the city has been waived, so we will not be receiving the bill from the RCMP to the City of Fredericton."
He said he's also asked the city to provide a cost breakdown of how much it had to spend as a result of the shootings.
"As soon as I have that, we're going to sit down and see what other further assistance we can provide to them," Urquhart said, as he was cheered by members of the legislative assembly.
The city has said a $2.1 million budget shortfall this year was mostly related to the cost of the shootings.
A gunman killed police constables Robb Costello, 45, and Sara Burns, 43, and civilians Donnie Robichaud, 42, and Bobbi Lee Wright, 32, outside an apartment building on the north side of Fredericton.
Coun. Greg Ericson, chair of the city's finance committee, said the announcement that RCMP will be waiving the bill for its services related to the shootings came as a surprise to him, although the city had asked the federal and provincial governments for help.
"Certainly, the city is incredibly thankful for their support," he said. "As far as I know, city staff and members of the province's staff have meetings scheduled … to discuss those issues because there's a lot of different costs coming from different places."
![]()
Coun. Greg Ericson, the chair of the public safety and environment committee, said the city would appreciate any help from provincial and federal governments. (CBC)
Ericson said the total cost of the shootings is still unclear. In approximate figures, he said, the city will spend $2.1 million over two years to hire 10 new officers. The regimental funeral is expected to cost around $1 million, and the investigation, which continues, is expected to cost $1 million.
Ericson said the RCMP costs could be part of all three areas of shooting costs, and he doesn't yet know how much the waived bills will actually save the city.
He said the finance committee hasn't seen bills or a description of services in the aftermath of the shootings.
"They were active in the regimental funeral, they were active in the investigation, they were active providing service support on the scene," he said.
"I don't know the full scope of their activities but they were a magnificent support for the city, and they were greatly relied on at that time."
He said the city is looking forward to conversations next week to sort out all the expenses and what kind of timelines they should expect.
However, he's sure no amount of surprise financial relief will change the budget passed by council last week. The budget included major fee increases and some cuts in capital projects.
"At this point the budget is signed, sealed and delivered," he said.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and PracticesDuring question period Tuesday, Fredericton North MLA Stephen Horsman asked if the Progressive Conservative government was going to do anything to help the city avoid debt.
Minister of Public Safety Carl Urquhart said the government has met with RCMP and "the cost of RCMP policing to the city has been waived, so we will not be receiving the bill from the RCMP to the City of Fredericton."
He said he's also asked the city to provide a cost breakdown of how much it had to spend as a result of the shootings.
"As soon as I have that, we're going to sit down and see what other further assistance we can provide to them," Urquhart said, as he was cheered by members of the legislative assembly.
The city has said a $2.1 million budget shortfall this year was mostly related to the cost of the shootings.
A gunman killed police constables Robb Costello, 45, and Sara Burns, 43, and civilians Donnie Robichaud, 42, and Bobbi Lee Wright, 32, outside an apartment building on the north side of Fredericton.
Coun. Greg Ericson, chair of the city's finance committee, said the announcement that RCMP will be waiving the bill for its services related to the shootings came as a surprise to him, although the city had asked the federal and provincial governments for help.
"Certainly, the city is incredibly thankful for their support," he said. "As far as I know, city staff and members of the province's staff have meetings scheduled … to discuss those issues because there's a lot of different costs coming from different places."
Ericson said the RCMP costs could be part of all three areas of shooting costs, and he doesn't yet know how much the waived bills will actually save the city.
He said the finance committee hasn't seen bills or a description of services in the aftermath of the shootings.
"They were active in the regimental funeral, they were active in the investigation, they were active providing service support on the scene," he said.
"I don't know the full scope of their activities but they were a magnificent support for the city, and they were greatly relied on at that time."
He said the city is looking forward to conversations next week to sort out all the expenses and what kind of timelines they should expect.
However, he's sure no amount of surprise financial relief will change the budget passed by council last week. The budget included major fee increases and some cuts in capital projects.
"At this point the budget is signed, sealed and delivered," he said.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:55:47 -0400
Subject: YO John Logan your old pals in Canadian Forces and the RCMP
can never claim that they didn't know the awful truth N'esy Pas?
To: robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
premier@gnb.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca>, David.Coon@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
premier@ontario.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
Jack.Keir@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
serge.gauvin@snb.ca, <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
pm@pm.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca,
claude.poirier@snb.ca, alan.roy@snb.ca, Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca,
Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca, Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca, Catherine.Harrop@cbc.ca,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com, news919@rogers.com,
attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, clare.barry@justice.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca,
dan.bussieres@gnb.ca
https://davidraymondamos3.
Wednesday, 12 December 2018
The latest Public Safety Minister Carl Urquhart yesterday the RCMP and
many lawyers know Fat Fred City and the province are about to get sued
BIGTIME
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:50 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
ashley.beaudin@gnb.cam
>. Thank you!From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 06:55:47 -0400
Subject: YO John Logan your old pals in Canadian Forces and the RCMP
can never claim that they didn't know the awful truth N'esy Pas?
To: robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
premier@gnb.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca>, David.Coon@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
premier@ontario.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
Jack.Keir@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
serge.gauvin@snb.ca, <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
pm@pm.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca,
claude.poirier@snb.ca, alan.roy@snb.ca, Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca,
Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca, Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca, Catherine.Harrop@cbc.ca,
Frank.McKenna@td.com, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com, news919@rogers.com,
attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, clare.barry@justice.gc.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca,
Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca, Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca,
dan.bussieres@gnb.ca
https://davidraymondamos3.
Wednesday, 12 December 2018
The latest Public Safety Minister Carl Urquhart yesterday the RCMP and
many lawyers know Fat Fred City and the province are about to get sued
BIGTIME
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:50 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca
---
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
sera examiné.
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gauvin, Serge (SNB)"<Serge.Gauvin@snb.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 17:48:49 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : YO Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin Enjoy
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am out of the office. Please contact Patrick Windle at
patrick.windle@snb.ca
Je suis absent du bureau. Veuillez contacter Patrick Windle à
patrick.windle@snb.ca
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Cormier, Donna (JAG/JPG)"<donna.cormier@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:15:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yp John Logan I just called
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I'm away from the office until December 12, 2018. Should your matter
require immediate attention, please contact Susan Butler at (506)
453-6309.
Je suis à l'extérieur du bureau jusqu'au 12 décembre 2018. Si votre
matière est urgente, veuillez communiquer avec Susan Butler au (506)
453-6309.
Merci / Thank you
Donna Cormier
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 15:49:18 -0400
Subject: Yp John Logan I just called
To: donna.cormier@gnb.ca, John.Logan@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 02:04:52 -0400
Subject: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong Organization
commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
To: Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>,
"carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Stephane.vaillancourt"
<Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, "michael.comeau"<michael.comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Norman.Sabourin"<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>,
"gerry.lowe"<gerry.lowe@gnb.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"
<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "dale.drummond"
<dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ethics-ethique ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:22:30 -0500
Subject: Re: Re My many calls to the Calgary Police Dept about their
client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
This will confirm that we have received your enquiry and it has been
placed in a priority sequence.
******************************
La présente confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre requête et qu'elle
a été placée en ordre de priorité de réception.
Thank you/Merci
Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle
Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada
73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101
RCMP Mailstop #58/
GRC Arrêt Postal #58
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0R2
1-866-206-0195 (off/bur)
ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
"Strong Ethics, Strong Organization"
« Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide »
This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is
loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be
reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the
originator."
« Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis
en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié
ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2018 23:39:28 -0400
Subject: Re My many calls to the Calgary Police Dept about their
client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
To: patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>, "philip.bryden"
<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Glen Canning
<grcanning@gmail.com>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
pol4982 <pol4982@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
city.manager@calgary.ca, lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca,
Glenda.Cole@calgary.ca, Shannon.Belvedere@calgary.ca,
Brian.Graham@calgary.ca, David.Lewis@calgary.ca,
David.Mercer@calgary.ca, Stephen.Wheeler@calgary.ca,
Douglas.Merchant@calgary.ca, mike lokken
<mike.lokken@albertaicenorth.
<Mike.Lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
pol9600@calgarypolice.ca, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, Seand@wsba.org, Saran@wsba.org,
mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>, douge@wsba.org, "serge.rousselle"
<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, mrichard
<mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"martin.gaudet"<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
misandry.happens@gmail.com, thomas@1000notes.com, paulal@wsba.org,
Questions@wsba.org, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:45:21 -0400
Subject: Attn Sean Davis we just talked about the ethics of Washington
State Bar Association and their friend Patrick Doran
To: Seand@wsba.org, Saran@wsba.org, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
douge@wsba.org, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, mrichard
<mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Paula Littlewood
Executive Director
206-733-5950 | paulal@wsba.org
voicemail only
Sean Davis
General Counsel, Director of the Office of General Counsel
206-733-5944 | Seand@wsba.org
Sara Niegowski
Chief Communications & Outreach Officer
206-733-5930 | Saran@wsba.org
Jean McElroy
Chief Regulatory Counsel, Director of Regulatory Services Department
206-727-8277 | jeanm@wsba.org
Doug Ende
Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Director of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel
206-727-8275 | douge@wsba.org
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:16:05 -0400
Subject: Now I have some questions about the ethics of the Washington
State Bar Association and their friend Patrick Doran
To: paulal@wsba.org, Questions@wsba.org, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, washington
field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ethics-ethique
<ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"misandry.happens"<misandry.happens@gmail.com>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Monday, 4 June 2018
Now I have some questions about the ethics of the Washington State Bar
Association and their friend Patrick Doran
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Misandry Today Admits To Sharing The Mad Shangi's Dox
1,581 views
Cognitive Thought
Streamed live on Mar 14, 2018
Joining me is VampKandy & Sinatra.
9 Comments
David Amos
2 months ago
The RCMP can bet our thin Canadian dimes to fat Yankee petrodollars
that I saved this video and the FBI know why
David Amos
2 months ago
I hear you people talking about Glen Canning and I dealing with your
pal Patrick Doran you can bet I contacted the cops AGAIN
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Update from Washington State Bar Association
9 views
Mad Shangi
Published on Jun 4, 2018
I got a follow up from the Washington State Bar Association. The
matter is closed, and no further action will be taken. It's
disappointing, but not surprising.
https://encyclopediadramatica.
https://www.wsba.org/about-
Our Mission
The mission of the Washington State Bar Association is to serve the
public and the members of the Bar, to ensure the integrity of the
legal profession, and to champion justice.
The Washington State Bar Association is part of the judicial branch,
exercising a governmental function authorized by the Washington
Supreme Court to license the state’s more than 38,000 legal
professionals. The WSBA both regulates lawyers under the authority of
the Court and serves its members as a professional association — all
without public funding.
As a regulatory agency, the WSBA administers the bar admission
process, including the bar exam; provides record-keeping and licensing
functions; and administers the professional discipline system. As a
professional association, the WSBA also provides continuing legal
education for attorneys, in addition to numerous other educational and
member-services and opportunities to advance professionally.
Governance and Leadership
The Board of Governors is WSBA's governing body charged with
determining the general policies of the Bar and approving its annual
budget. The Board consists of the president, president-elect, and
immediate past president and members elected from each Congressional
District and three at-large positions.
The Board of Governors elects the president-elect of the Bar and
selects the executive director.
Questions? Contact our knowledgeable Service Center representatives or
key support contacts. We are here to assist you 8 a.m.–5 p.m. Monday
through Friday.
Phone
Toll-free: 800-945-9722
Local: 206-443-9722
Questions@wsba.org
Fax
206-727-8316 – Main
206-727-8325 – Office of Disciplinary Counsel
206-727-8313 – Regulatory Services, Licensing and Admissions
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.
>
>
> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.
Department of Justice
On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:25:46 -0400
Subject: YO "Misandry Today" your pal "Thomas" or anyone else can go
to the 52 minute mark of this hearing held about 2 weeks before Barry
Winters was finally arrested and listen to me mention Patrick Doran's
malicous work within Encylopedia Dramatic
To: Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, thomas <thomas@1000notes.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor
<themayor@calgary.ca>
https://archive.org/details/
Then his fellow Trolls should check Doran's work in ED
https://encyclopediadramatica.
Nobody can deny that he provides the entire text of my lawsuit srcoll
down to Paragraph 75 to reqd the following statement AGAIN Do you not
see Doran and Wnters named???
75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
“Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
Winters and his blogs.
BTW the DavidRayAmos Troll attacking using my name is not me. I was
not aware of Doran in ED until Barry Winters blogged about it
I suspect it was the same Troll who created the ED webpage that you
used to source your bullshit about me from
The reason I CC'd the universe and many cops in particular is because
I am filing a lawsuit about the shit.
In a nutshell Doran is a shill for the Calgary cops Get it yet?
On 3/31/18, Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> Thank you for directing your email to me specifically so I can respond.
>
> Please do not take my lack of response to your prior emails as a form of
> disrespect, its not. However, after reading your prior emails, I was unable
> to decipher who your message was specifically directed it.
>
> Was there something specific you wanted to discuss? Or were you just
> notifying me on the links and info included in this most recent email?
>
> Also, is there a reason the known universe is CC'd?
>
> Again, I'm not being disrespectful, but I know very little about you and
> your history with Patrick Doran, other than there was some sort of feud.
>
> Can you provide me some history and context?
>
> Respectfully,
> DDJ
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:37 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>> email-suit.html
>>
>>
>> Saturday, 31 March 2018
>> Yo "Misandry Today" does this email suit a noname Yankee paralegal's
>> demand of me that he quickly deleted?
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>>
>> LEGALLY PWNED: MISANDRY TODAY (DDJ)
>> 99 views
>> 15 1 Share
>>
>> Mad Shangi
>> Published on Mar 29, 2018
>>
>>
etc etc etc
https://www.youtube.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The DDJ Drama Stream Extravaganza #DramaLivesMatter
962 views
79
7
Share
Save
Cognitive Thought
Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018
DDJ has a Yes and No answer to a basic principle and conflates it with
an assumed argument.
If you like what you see, please Subscribe! (:
⚙Support My Work⚙
Streamlabs: https://streamlabs.com/
PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/
Maker Support: https://www.makersupport.com/
Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/
Merchandise: http://tee.pub/lic/ZH_vh4ESxHg
⚙Social Media⚙
Twitter: https://twitter.com/anonymous_
BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/
Minds: https://www.minds.com/
Gab: https://gab.ai/Cog_Thought
Discord: https://discord.gg/ryrKPCR
⚙Patrons⚙
Scott Mraz: https://www.youtube.com/c/
DerWeisePanda: https://twitter.com/
Joseph Yhu: http://www.twitter.com/
Bearing: https://www.youtube.com/
Olenska: https://twitter.com/
CatherineAquitaine: https://www.minds.com/
Sheepalicious: https://twitter.com/
Shareyourworldwide: https://minds.com/
Joseph Palka: https://www.youtube.com/user/
Deodora Langerrud: https://www.facebook.com/
BobTheTrollKing: https://www.youtube.com/
The Gayest Person on Patreon: https://www.youtube.com/
Hoody: https://twitter.com/HoodyGeek
ShortBusMooner: https://twitter.com/
Chrome Fotter: https://www.youtube.com/
Occam's Razor: https://www.youtube.com/
A Very Dead Horse: https://www.youtube.com/
Thomas Schnadelbach
GarbageHumanTJM64
Clackston Biaar
Drauka Grissa
Paulie J
Debra J O'Connor
Static Citizen
Robert Etgeton III
Matt Studwell
Agent_R_Patriarchy
David Berryman
(To all my Patrons without links, let me know what social link you'd like here.)
Thank you all for your support!
More than anything though, whatever you do with your day, enjoy yourself. (:
Category
People & Blogs
14 Comments
David Amos
Add a public comment...
David Amos
David Amos
8 months ago
Clearly by your own words you perverts know that I contacted the cops
in Canada, the USA and the UK about your slander and criminal libel.
Please do go ahead and study my blog and discuss it on one of your oh
so informative livestreams. Trust that you will find this comment at
the top of this blog in a heartbeat along with some selected comments
from your live chat last night while your discussion bored me enough
to send me to la la land.
Feel free to check my work about YOUR obvious malice towards me.
http://davidraymondamos3.
That said. I have no false illusions about justice. However I also
know I can make you perverts rather infamous as I bust ya in front of
your friends. We all know the corrupt cops in the UK who are more
concerned about Nazi Pugs will never act within the scope of their
employment just like the RCMP and the FBI never did. Everybody knows
its because of my lawsuits in the USA and Canada. However the RCMP
and I have been at war since 1982 when Coggy Baby was no doubt
shitting yellow.
My contact info is always on the bottom of the lawsuits and made
public by the courts. Hence I have no problem whatsoever telling the
world who I am in a sick little Troll's YouTube channel that may go
"Poof" tomorrow if I decide to pick up the phone contact Google's
lawyers personally. If you dummies had bothered to notice I sent their
top lawyer in the USA and Canada the same email the "Thomas"
chickenshit makes fun of.
What if I decide to waste some more of precious time on Trolls and
figure out who you are? What id I then "dox" you dudes and DDJ as
well on the Internet before I name you all within a paragraph or two
in my next lawsuit against the Crown? If you had bothered to read
paragraph 75 of a lawsuit NOT about cows (Federal Court File No
T-1557-15) you would have seen that I did it with Patty Baby Doran
and his butt buddy Barry Winters in 2015. Correct? My my won't that be
fun for the RCMP and their shills when I do it again particularly
after Barry Winters was arrested and then purportedly shit the bed
last year?
Please feel free to tell us more in your next livestream just how much
fun you perverted Trolls are still having with me. Rest assured that
I will save every word.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
5 Campbell St
Apohaqui, NB
902 800 0369
Never forget that you nasty noname little bastards picked this fight with me.
Ragnok Ulfbhert
Ragnok Ulfbhert
8 months ago (edited)
The "Somewhere in the pooblic space" over the rainbow spoof has to be
a song Cog. It will be glorious lol
4
Saoirse
Saoirse
8 months ago
See I knew there was a reason I found myself wide awake at 4 am. I
have a 2 and a half hour podcast to catch up on.
3
Admiral Thunderbunny
Admiral Thunderbunny
8 months ago
Can't we just agree that DDJ is just a:
Transitional
Amalgamation of
Recycled
Detritus
3
The Badman
The Badman
8 months ago
Ddj is a grandad probably in his 50s just so you know cog
2
John Brown
John Brown
8 months ago
Grandpas don't behave the way he does. Absolutely not.
Mad Shangi
Mad Shangi
8 months ago
DDJ exposed for breaking the law. https://www.youtube.com/watch?
MGTOW REVEALED
MGTOW REVEALED
8 months ago
Turd flinging monkey just got terminated for community guidelines.
Celestina Monkey and Misandry Today DDJ is next :) All MGTOWS are
going down, MGTOW is cancer, worse than feminism. Good riddance.
1
The Badman
The Badman
8 months ago
Did Katherine lamp show up? What happened I musta missed a stream
1
CaptainAwesomesworld
CaptainAwesomesworld
8 months ago
The Badman dollars to doughnuts kat lamp is a ddj sock puppet
1
The Badman
The Badman
8 months ago
nah, she was on his just a stream stream, she is just a senile looney old bag.
John Brown
John Brown
8 months ago
Hey Cog, you should know that DDJ has said multiple times that he's an
orphan. Doesn't that count as coming from a broken home? Oh wait, his
statements don't apply to him, my bad.
Mad Shangi
Mad Shangi
8 months ago
You might appreciate this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Live chat replay is on. Messages that appeared when the stream was
live will show up here.
David Amos
Are Coggy and Patty Baby having a bad day? Say Hoka Hey to your cop
pals for me will ya?
David Amos
You should know Patty Baby Everybody with two clues between their
ears must have figured out that you are a shill for the corrupt
Calgary cops
David Amos
That why Barry Winters got arrested but you did not Correct?
David Amos
You tell these fools I sued about cows and they believe you? Too too
funny indeed
David Amos
Perhaps your pals should read paragraph 75 of the lawsuit they make
fun of to see what is said of Trolls and the names of Patty Baby Doran
and Barry Winters EH?
lennon 41
WE THE CHAT
Doku HL SD
#CowGang
lennon 41
RESERVE THE RIGHT
Mad Shangi
Is he insinuating that people who are commenting on his videos now
are part of a conspiracy?!
Doku HL SD
the age of man is over the age of cow is now
Jorge mackensen
Get your cowsuits and tin foil hat on, we're gonna stalk some cows today......
Unholy Mole
the cownt down to destruction
Nightbot
⚙Support The Channel⚙ https://streamlabs.com/
DataWasteland
AND MILK IT FOR ALL ITS WORTH
Doku HL SD
madox cow disease
lennon 41
FUCKIN NORMIES
Jacob gulf city Navo
I want to punch ddj in the face
DataWasteland
IRRITABLE BULL SYNDROME
Doku HL SD
cownflicting arguments
Jimmie The Rustle
I don't think DDJ is observing the same reality as the rest of us.
lennon 41
TOWER 7 THAT HOE
Toothless Cowboy
Inifinte Bull Shite #MADoxcow ?
Doku HL SD
#MADoxcow
Doku HL SD
cow gang is on the rise
DataWasteland
ITS THE NEW MOOOOVMENT
Jacob gulf city Navo
Olenska I’m going to bed goodnight
Doku HL SD
MOOOOOO
Mad Shangi
Something tells me this April 1st conversation ain't happening. LOL!
Doku HL SD
MOOOOOOvement
Mad Shangi
He's got a bitch made voice.
Jorge mackensen
DDQ= Drama Dairy Queen
Doku HL SD
moooooove up dat drama
Doku HL SD
we're all from broken pastures
CThomas The Peasant
@Olenska Did I miss much of the (((autism)))?
Nightbot
⚙Support The Channel⚙ https://streamlabs.com/
Doku HL SD
🐄🐄🐄🐄🐄
Mad Shangi
Traumatic like the way his kids got fondled by his ex's boyfriend?
CThomas The Peasant
@Olenska Is it Moo-ving?
Jorge mackensen
I'm disturbed by the amount of Udders on the DDQ show mooooooooooooo🐮
CThomas The Peasant
@Olenska So I've herd
Doku HL SD
we have a cow gang problem on the internet we need a new moovement to
combats its
Catherine Aquitaine
Hello everyone!
Mad Shangi
I think @David Amos gave up on us. LOL!
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:47:21 -0400
Subject: Re My many calls to the City of Calgary this week about the
Calgary Police Dept their client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
To: themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, city.manager@calgary.ca,
lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca, Glenda.Cole@calgary.ca,
Shannon.Belvedere@calgary.ca, Brian.Graham@calgary.ca,
David.Lewis@calgary.ca, David.Mercer@calgary.ca,
Stephen.Wheeler@calgary.ca, Douglas.Merchant@calgary.ca, mike lokken
<mike.lokken@albertaicenorth.
<Mike.Lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol9600@calgarypolice.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Nobody should deny the fact that I tried to reason with you people for
ten long years.
Yesterday I had heard enough from people playing dumb.
Here is the email I promised to send to your lawyers
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:16:30 -0400
Subject: Re: DDJ's Inferno: Responding to MadShangi's Campaign of Harassment
To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
"Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Scorched Earth = Butt Hurt
59 views
Mad Shangi
Published on Mar 12, 2018
What happens when you trigger a sex-doll peddlin' fake MGTOW? Well,
you get doxxed of course.
On 3/12/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> DDJ's Inferno: Responding to MadShangi's Campaign of Harassment
> 2,412 views
> Misandry Today
> Published on Mar 11, 2018
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:24:02 -0400
Subject: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt Cops and their
clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in BC, Dean Roger
Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran in Alberta, Encyclopedia Dramatica,
the Baconfat Legacy etc and Section 300 of the Canadian Crimial Code
To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
"philip.bryden"<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
<Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
<ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
"bill.clark"<bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca>
<Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
<ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
danadurnford <danadurnford@hotmail.com>, Dean Ray
<deanrogerray@hotmail.com>, maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>,
xtofury <xtofury@gmail.com>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
"don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, smcintyre
<smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
"david.eby.mla"<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, pol7163
<pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, police <police@halifax.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, police <police@fredericton.ca>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<grcanning@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
https://encyclopediadramatica.
http://baconfatlegacy.
The Baconfat Legacy
Blog Archive
• ▼ 2018 (1)
o ▼ January (1)
Glen Canning: Exploiter of Rehtaeh Parsons
• ▼ 2017 (11)
o ▼ December (1)
Disturbed Troll Glen Canning Leaves Even More Angr...
o ▼ October (10)
The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Am...
The New Baconfat Mission Statement
Archive: Glen Canning and Leah Parsons on Stage
Butt-Hurt Troll Glen Canning Posts A Comment
The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos (1980's s...
The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos
The Musical PWNage of Glen Canning
RIP BARRY WINTERS: Don't Let Free Speech Die With ...
Glen Canning: Psychopath
Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
Tuesday, 24 October 2017
Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
Welcome to The Baconfat Legacy - started in tribute to Mr. Barry
Winters: a controversial blogger, opinionated troll and Edmonton
resident, who sadly passed away. Before his passing, his blog was the
subject of hate crime charges due to the offensive politically
incorrect nature of Barry's writing. I will continue this blog in that
tradition. You are going to read words like "faggot,""nigger,"
"kike,""spick,""nip,""bitch,""cunt,""whore,""slut,""wop,"
"midget," and anything else that just happens to pop into my head,
because like Barry I'm an equal opportunity offender. And if you don't
like the aggressive, in your face, deliberately offensive nature of
this blog well you can suck my fucking dick. Go tell David Amos and
Glen Canning to go fuck themselves too. Alert your local authorities
and go bitch to your friends in the government, because the Baconfat
is back baby.
And in the interest of free speech I hope you fuckers try to shut me
down, because I will fight you. If you don't like this blog, then
don't read it. Go read the fucking Babysitter's Club for all I care.
But any bullshit trumped up charges you throw at me will make my day.
Because the day we start locking people up for talking shit in a
fucking blog, is the day that fascism rules. C'yall in court,
motherfuckers.
Posted by Mad Shangi at 00:24
http://www.canadianlawlist.
Glenda E. Cole
City Solicitor
Called to the bar: 1988 (AB); Q.C.2013 (AB)
Phone: 403-268-5182
City Solicitor's Office
Law Dept., 12th Flr., 800 Macleod Trail S.E.
PO Box 2100, Stn. M
Calgary, Alberta T2P 2M5
Phone: 403-268-2441
Fax: 403-268-4634
Email: lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca
Listed Individuals
Shannon C. Belvedere
Mary Ann Bendfeld
Jocelyn J. Caldwell
Glenda E. Cole
C. Tat Fan
Jill S. Floen
James T. Floyd
Paul Frank
Leila J. Gosselin
Brian C. Graham
Andrea Hankins-Palmer
Amanda Hart
T. E. Haufe
B. R. Inlow
Denise C. Jakal
Lori L. Kerr
My-Le Lai
David J. Lewis
Richard Loomer
Lesia Luciuk
Ola Malik
David E. Mercer
Douglas D. Merchant
Hanna Oh
Lise Olsen
Carol L. Reesor
Marnie B. Rusen
Colleen N. Sinclair
Tina Squire
R. Shawn Swinn
Stephen B. Wheeler
Trudy Wobeser
http://davidraymondamos3.
Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
Court File No. T-1557-15
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Plaintiff
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Defendant
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
72. The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary,
Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the
Plaintiff ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had
researched Byron Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of
Justice in late 2006 has not been made public. More importantly the
lawyer who has been the MP representing Fundy Royal for the past
eleven years and that the former Minister of Public Safety
acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about Byron Prior that
contained the entire text of his website before the writ was dropped
for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email exchange
has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on the
Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed.
The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find
published on the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman”
character named Max published within the YouTube domain. It was an
interview of Byron Prior as he was protesting on the grounds of the
House of Commons the day after the Prime Minister was found in
“Contempt of Parliament” and his most contemptuous minority mandate
became a matter of history. His majority mandate is history and the
Plaintiff seeks relief.
73. The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public
Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia
claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had
several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons
during 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the
Plaintiff but he does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the
same street as the Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is
being prosecuted by the Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It
is unlikely he would move far from the city soon. If the Crown wishes
to argue this complaint Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc should be
summoned to testify about what they know of this matter and of their
being illegally barred from parliament properties as well. Failing
that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of documentation
including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide byway of
digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the concerns
of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the
Plaintiff and many others.
74. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was
before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff
that she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and
while visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by
the RCMP and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert
area of Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency
offices of the Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded
her emails to and from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former
Premier and the office of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff
to support her. The Plaintiff introduced himself to all the
aforementioned parties in order to assist Robin Reid and they were
ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff discovered he could no longer
assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the actions of Neo Nazis who
supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP and many other law
enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well aware of the
reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people in any
fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis
are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown
but their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.
75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
“Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
Winters and his blogs.
76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up
on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor
Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their
actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal
gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to
politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters
responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June
of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry
Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his
published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That
fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received
any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the
EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime
Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while
continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to
university students and anyone else who will listen to them
particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every
word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic
cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a
lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He
considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates
that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of
cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court
of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore
other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work
of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and
WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the
EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking
him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and
to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the
anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the
questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of
Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the
law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations.
78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified
himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a
follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for
certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff
has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of
time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone
number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior.
The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable
fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss
the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and
the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA
and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know
that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend to be anyone by
having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP or the EPS)
appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows commercial
programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former
assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to
jail because of robo calls.
79. The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions
to sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring
his complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was
trying to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to
pull the same trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that
if the EPS managed to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s
signature then it would delay his lawsuit because the EPS could claim
that his complaint under investigation and that the EPS could say
nothing about it until the matter had concluded. The Plaintiff
informed the EPS that anyone could use an anonymous phone number and
claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it should do so from an
identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just like he does. In
fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous calls for many
years and the police claimed they could do nothing because the
malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted
ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the
harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal
barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada.
80. The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet
harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of
two Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and
promptly ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends
were being much harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the
RCMP in NB created a YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to
catch a local arsonist. As soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about
eleven incidents of arson on his friend’s farm in the same area the
Plaintiff and his friend were attacked by many Troll’s within the
Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only laughed at the obvious
malice that they were publishing for a year without attempting to
moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the RCMP
YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of
members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of “Organized
Crime”. The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments
within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand
to a local office of the RCMP. Once the Plaintiff had a conversation
with a member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s
complaint, the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and
said nothing further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most
of the comments digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and
the RCMP. Years later the Crown stayed the “Organized Crime” charges
against the Tingleys and a publication ban was placed on their
concerns about malicious prosecution. The matter was put before the
Supreme Court of Canada Rodney Tingley, et al. v. Her Majesty the
Queen SCC Docket no. 34107 and the Plaintiff had no idea of any
outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak with some of the Tingleys
and they admitted to knowing about him and his common concerns with
the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have advised them not
to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same holds true
with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another German who
moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting against
them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s
easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as
they attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of
lawsuit.
81. The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
that was before the SCC. The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
82. The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
Winters was in fact o...
[Message clipped] View entire message