Liberal MP says Trudeau should face leadership review | Power & Politics
26,004 viewsJan 24, 2024
Liberal MP Ken McDonald says he thinks it's time for his party to consider a leadership review of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. The Newfoundland MP stopped short of saying Trudeau should step down but did say he would like to see some sort of review organized within the party. The Power Panel weighs in on McDonald's comments
Carbon tax | Is Prime Minister Justin Trudeau facing a revolt within his own ranks?
45,038views ![]()
![]()
YO Petey Baby MacKay RE Federal Court Court File
No. T-1557-15 l`honorable Seamus O'Regan recalls my emails when he was
the Associate Minister of National Defence N'esy Pas Maxime Bernier?
> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III. Issue
>
> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV. Analysis
>
> A. Standard of Review
>
> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V. Conclusion
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
Jan 24, 2024
The Liberal cabinet retreat is being overshadowed by a Newfoundland MP speaking out against the carbon tax. CTV’s Kevin Gallagher reports.
MP Ken McDonald walks back his comments that Liberals need a leadership review
Avalon MP now says he's not calling for a review, says prime minister is a 'great campaigner'
Liberal MP Ken McDonald has done an about-face on comments to a Radio-Canada reporter this week when he said Prime Minister Justin Trudeau should be subject to a leadership review.
In a statement sent Thursday morning, McDonald walked back his comments, insisting he wasn't calling for a leadership review.
"The intent of my recent public comments was not to personally call for a leadership review, and I am not calling for one now," said McDonald, the member of Parliament for Newfoundland's Avalon riding.
Despite his statement Thursday, McDonald was clear in his comments to Radio-Canada reporter Laurence Martin in a recent interview that he wanted to see a leadership review, and that he wasn't sure if Trudeau was the right leader for the party heading into the next election.
WATCH | Ken McDonald's full comments on a leadership review:
While
he stopped short of saying the prime minister should step down, Liberal
MP Ken McDonald — who represents the Avalon riding — tells
Radio-Canada’s Laurence Martin a change is needed and he anticipates the
Conservatives making major inroads in the Atlantic provinces. McDonald
has been on the outs with his Liberal party before, voting with the
Conservatives on a motion to abolish carbon pricing.
"The government now of today is getting to be an old government," McDonald said in the interview, published Wednesday. "People are thinking maybe it's time for a change. I tell everybody: every leader, every party has a best-before date. Our best-before date is here. So we either have to change things up in a way to make people think we're new again, or we're able to do better going forward. But that's not something I have control of."
"You seem to suggest that there needs to be some sort of a shakeup, like maybe a leadership shakeup or something?" Martin asked.
"Even a leadership review, right? Like—" said McDonald.
"You want a leadership review?" asked Martin.
"A leadership review," continued McDonald. "Normally, in most circumstances in politics and especially in the federal government, if you go from a majority government to a minority government, there's supposed to be a leadership review. That hasn't happened. And we went in a minority in 2019 … and then we went to another minority in '21."
"So you think at least there should be a leadership review in the Liberal party?" Martin asked.
"Yes," he responded. "Let's clear the air. Let's, you know, as a party let's clear the air, and if people are still intent on having the leader we have now, fine, but at least give people the opportunity to have their say in what they think of the direction the party is going."
"And if there were a review like that, would you continue supporting Justin Trudeau or would you look for somebody else?" Martin asked.
"I would want to see the slate of candidates that would come forward and hear from them individually and then I would make up my mind," McDonald said.
"So it's not clear for you right now whether Justin Trudeau is the right leader for the Liberal party?"
"No. It's not clear."
Prime
Minister Justin Trudeau has been in power since 2015 but has faced
declining popularity and questions about his leadership as a fourth
election looms. (Christinne Muschi/The Canadian Press)
Other Atlantic MPs silent
CBC/Radio-Canada asked 15 Liberal MPs throughout Atlantic Canada to respond to McDonald's comments on Wednesday. Zero responded.
While McDonald stopped short of calling for Trudeau to step down during the interview, he was unequivocal in saying he wasn't sure if he would support Trudeau in the coming election.
On Thursday, McDonald took a much different tone.
"As I said, I believe that the prime minister is a smart politician, a great campaigner, and I know he still has the best interest of Canadians at heart," the statement reads.
"I will continue to support my caucus colleagues and the prime minister as I've done since 2015."
Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Click here to visit our landing page.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
With files from Laurence Martin, Patrick Butler, Radio-Canada
YO Petey Baby MacKay RE Federal Court Court File
No. T-1557-15 l`honorable Seamus O'Regan recalls my emails when he was
the Associate Minister of National Defence N'esy Pas Maxime Bernier?
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 10:36 AM |
| To: Ken.McDonald@parl.gc.ca | |
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 15:07:33 -0400 Subject: YO Petey Baby MacKay RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 l`honorable Seamus O'Regan recalls my emails when he was the Associate Minister of National Defence N'esy Pas Maxime Bernier? To: "maxime.bernier"<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY" <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie. <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mikegoosney@hotmail.com, gpelleypc@gmail.com, dwight@roadaheadnl.ca, nick.whalen@parl.gc.ca, seamus@seamus.ca, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, Rene.Arseneault@parl.gc.ca, Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca, Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca, Pat.Finnigan@parl.gc.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl. Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca, Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca, TJ.Harvey@parl.gc.ca, Robert.Morrissey@parl.gc.ca, Ken.McDonald@parl.gc.ca, Gudie.Hutchings@parl.gc.ca, Larry.Bagnell@parl.gc.ca, Michael.McLeod@parl.gc.ca, Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca, Colin.Fraser@parl.gc.ca, Bernadette.Jordan@parl.gc.ca, Darrell.Samson@parl.gc.ca, Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca, Darren.Fisher@parl.gc.ca, Bill.Casey@parl.gc.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras" <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, maurice <maurice@connexionsplus.com> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "David.Lametti" <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michael.Wernick" <Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "hon.melanie.joly" <hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca>, "Catherine.McKenna" <Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca> https://www.cbc.ca/news/ New Minister of Indigenous Services Seamus O'Regan takes part in a meeting with Assembly of First Nations leaders in Ottawa on Jan. 14. O'Regan and AFN National Chief Perry Bellegarde announced the new policy Monday. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 02:43:11 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks it was you who picked a fight with me today EH Gregorios Tzemenakis? To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for your message. Please note that this inbox is monitored by Minister O`Regan's staff. If your message is an invitation, or related to the riding of St. John's South?-?Mount Pearl, we will respond to your message as soon as possible. If your message is related to his role as Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence, please e-mail minister-ministre@vac-acc.gc. or call 1-866-522-2122. Most importantly, if you are a Veteran or a family member in crisis, please dial 911. There is also a 24/7 mental health assistance line that you can reach at 1-800-268-7708. Veterans Affairs Canada also operates a network of mental health clinics and you can find the one closest to you here: http://www.veterans.gc.ca/eng/ Regards, The Office of the Honourable Seamus O'Regan, P.C., M.P. --/-- Merci pour votre message. Veuillez noter que cette bo?te de r?ception est surveill?e par les employ?s du bureau parlementaire du ministre O'Regan. Si votre message est une invitation, ou en lien avec sa circonscription de St. John's Sud?-?Mount Pearl, nous r?pondrons ? votre message d?s que possible. Si votre message lui est adress? ? titre de ministre des Anciens Combattants et ministre associ? de la D?fense nationale, veuillez ?crire au minister-ministre@vac-acc.gc. ou appeler le 1-866-522-2022. Plus important encore, si vous ?tes in V?t?ran, ou un membre de la famille d'un V?t?ran, en crise, composez le 911. Il y a aussi une ligne t?l?phonique disponible 24/7 o? vous pouvez parler ? un professionnel en sant? mentale. Cette ligne est le 1-800-268-7708. Anciens Combattants Canada op?re aussi un r?seau de cliniques en sant? mentale, et vous pouvez trouver une clinique pr?s de chez vous ici : http://www.veterans.gc.ca/fra/ Salutations, Le bureau de l`honorable Seamus O'Regan, P.C., M.P. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:58:02 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest you recall this email? To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed. To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. Thank you ------------------- Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de Vancouver Granville. Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal. Merci ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:58:02 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest you recall this email? To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for contacting my office. This automated response is to assure you that your message has been received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible. Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not able to respond personally to every inquiry. Please do not hesitate to contact my office at the coordinates below should you have any questions regarding the status of your query. Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of Environment and Climate Change if it concerns topics pertaining to the Minister of Environment and Climate Changes' role. For all future correspondence addressed to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change, I ask that you please write directly to ec.ministre-minister.ec@ Best, Catherine McKenna, Member of Parliament, Ottawa Centre * * * Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqu? avec mon bureau. La pr?sente r?ponse automatique vous est envoy?e pour vous informer que votre message a ?t? re?u et qu'il sera examin? le plus rapidement possible. En raison du volume ?lev? de correspondance re?ue, je ne peux r?pondre personnellement ? chaque demande. N'h?sitez pas ? contacter mon bureau aux coordonn?es ci-dessous pour vous renseigner sur le statut de votre demande. Veuillez noter que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de l'Environnement et du Changement climatique s'il concerne des questions qui ont trait au r?le de la ministre de l'Environnement et du Changement climatique. Nous vous prions d'envoyer directement toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de l'Environnement et du Changement climatique ? ec.ministre-minister.ec@ Cordialement, Catherine McKenna, d?put?e, Ottawa Centre ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:58:02 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest you recall this email? To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for contacting the office of Sean Fraser, Member of Parliament for Central Nova. This is to assure you that your email has arrived, and that we appreciate hearing from you. If your matter is urgent, please contact our New Glasgow constituency office toll-free at 1-844-641-5886 between the hours of 8:30-4:30pm, and we will do our best to resolve your issue, or otherwise assist you. Thank you and have a great day! New Glasgow 2A-115 MacLean Street B2H 4M5 Toll-free 1-844-641-5886 902-752-0226 Antigonish 200-155 Main Street B2G 2B6 902-867-2919 Ottawa 110 Confederation Building K1A 0A6 613-992-6022 Facebook: facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<http Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter. Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www. www.seanfrasermp.ca Toll free: 1-844-641-5886 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:59:16 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest you recall this email? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com< Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases. ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 23:11:39 -0400 Subject: YO Katie Telford do ya think your buddy Gerry Butts or anyone else will recall this email by Wednesday? To: "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Paul.Shuttle" <Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, TCromwell@blg.com, catharine.tunney@cbc.ca, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts" <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer" <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, JagmeetForBurnaby <JagmeetForBurnaby@ndp.ca>, "maxime.bernier" <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "charlie.angus" <charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>, "elizabeth.may" <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "Hunter.Tootoo" <Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca>, "tony.clement.a1" <tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale" <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet" <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "jp.lewis"<jp.lewis@unb.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "David.Akin" <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com> https://davidraymondamos3. Tuesday, 12 February 2019 Jody Wilson-Raybould resigns from cabinet in wake of SNC-Lavalin allegations ---------- Original message ---------- From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:40 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can never deny that I tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and his latest client Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts? To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed. To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. Thank you ------------------- Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de Vancouver Granville. Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal. Merci https://twitter.com/ David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google "David Amos Federal Court file No. T-1557-15" in order to sort out the truth from fiction for themselves N'esy Pas? https://davidraymondamos3. #nbpoli #cdnpoli https://www.cbc.ca/news/ Jody Wilson-Raybould resigns from cabinet in wake of SNC-Lavalin allegations 236 Comments David Amos Surprise Surprise Surprise David Amos And now the lady quits? Yea Right Trust that Mr Scheer and everyone else who sits in opposition know that Jody Wilson-Raybould may have lost her mandate as Justice Minister because of her failings in Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal within my lawsuit against the Crown that was filed when Harper was the Prime Minister and Mr Scheer was the Speaker. Need I say that it irritated me bigtime when Jody appointed her Deputy Minister to the bench of Federal Court not long after I argued their minions in the Federal Court of Appeal? Methinks anyone can check my work by simply Googling two names "Jody Wilson-Raybould David Raymond Amos" N'esy Pas? David Amos Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google "David Amos Federal Court file No." in order to sort out the truth from fiction for themselves. Its blatantly obvious that Mr Trudeau had a duty to talk to Harper's Minister of justice and Peter MacKay and had them pay particular attention to info found within statement 83 of my lawsuit long before the election in October of 2015 Everybody knows why I am about to put the aforementioned matter before the Supreme Court and file several more lawsuits in the Federal Court against the RCMP and the CRA etc and also run for a seat in Parliament again N'esy Pas? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Randy.Boissonnault@parl.gc.ca Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:57:12 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Minister Qualtrough RE "Litigation Lmbo" Please enjoy an email that you and your fellow members of the PCO ignored for way past too long To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Hello, Thank you for writing to my office. I value hearing from Edmonton Centre constituents and stakeholders. Your email will be read. My team and I will be happy to respond. This email is an automatic response to let you know that your correspondence has been received. Please do not reply. As we prioritize responding first to residents of Edmonton Centre, please provide your postal code, if you have not done so already. Should you need it, this link will help you confirm who your Member of Parliament is: https://bit.ly/1BgbGyd. I will reply as soon as possible whether your issue pertains to you personally or if you have written to me on a matter related to my LGBTQ2 responsibilities or other legislative duties. If another government department or Member of Parliament can better address your inquiry, we will forward your email to the appropriate office and invite them to respond to you. Thank you again for writing to me. Kind regards, Randy Boissonnault Member of Parliament for Edmonton Centre Special Advisor to the Prime Minister on LGBTQ2 Issues E-mail: randy.boissonnault@parl.gc.ca< Website: http://rboissonnault.liberal. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/R. Twitter and Instagram: @R_Boissonnault ------------------------------ Bonjour, Merci d'avoir ?crit ? mon bureau. J'appr?cie lire les ?lecteurs et les intervenants d'Edmonton-Centre. Votre courriel sera lu et mon ?quipe et moi serons heureux d'y r?pondre. Ce courriel est une r?ponse automatique pour vous faire savoir que votre correspondance a bien ?t? re?ue. S'il vous pla?t ne r?pondez pas. ?tant donn? que nous donnons priorit? aux r?sidents d'Edmonton-Centre, s'il-vous-pla?t veuillez nous fournir votre code postal si vous ne l'avez pas d?j? fait. Au besoin, le lien suivant vous aidera ? confirmer qui est votre d?put?: https://bit.ly/1CyAl50 . Je vous r?pondrai d?s que possible si votre enjeux vous concerne personnellement ou si vous m'avez ?crit sur une question li?e ? mes responsabilit?s sur les enjeux LGBTQ2 ou ? d'autres t?ches l?gislatives. Si un autre service gouvernemental ou un autre membre du Parlement est dans une meilleure position pour r?pondre ? votre demande, nous transmettrons votre courriel au bureau appropri? et les inviterons ? vous r?pondre. Merci encore de m'avoir ?crit. Cordialement, Randy Boissonnault D?put? d'Edmonton-Centre Conseiller sp?cial du premier ministre sur les enjeux LGBTQ2 E-mail: randy.boissonnault@parl.gc.ca< Site internet: http://rboissonnault.liberal. Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/R. Twitter et Instagram: @R_Boissonnault Jody Wilson-Raybould resigns from cabinet in wake of SNC-Lavalin allegations Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stressed Monday that he had 'full confidence' in Wilson-Raybould Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Feb 12, 2019 11:39 AM ET Jody Wilson-Raybould, the former Attorney General of Canada, has resigned from cabinet. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press) Jody Wilson-Raybould — the former justice minister who has kept largely silent since a news report claimed the Prime Minister's Office pressured her to help Quebec-based engineering firm SNC-Lavalin avoid criminal prosecution — has resigned from cabinet. She tweeted a link to her resignation letter this morning. "With a heavy heart I am writing to tender my resignation as the Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence," she wrote. Jody Wilson-Raybould ✔ @Puglaas With a heavy heart I have submitted my letter of resignation to the Prime Minister as a member of Cabinet... https://jwilson-raybould. … 1,873 12:34 PM - Feb 12, 2019 Statement from the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville |... jwilson-raybould.liberal.ca "When I sought federal elected office, it was with the goal of implementing a positive and progressive vision of change on behalf of all Canadians and a different way of doing poltics." Wilson-Raybould, who was shuffled to the Veterans Affairs portfolio in January, has been under intense scrutiny since a Globe and Mail report alleged last week that the PMO wanted her to direct federal prosecutors to make a "deferred prosecution agreement" (DPA) to avoid taking SNC-Lavalin to trial on bribery and fraud charges in relation to contracts in Libya. Wilson-Raybould, who plans to stay on as MP for Vancouver-Granville, has been quiet since the story broke, saying she can't comment because she's bound by solicitor-client privilege. In her resignation letter, she said she has retained the services of lawyer Thomas Cromwell, a former justice of the Supreme Court of Canada, to advise her on "topics that I am legally permitted to discuss on this matter." In an email to CBC News, Cromwell said he would not be making any statements or doing any interviews. A spokesperson for MP Francis Scarpaleggia, chair of the national Liberal caucus, said that as of Tuesday morning, Wilson-Raybould hadn't left caucus. Ethics investigation launched Her resignation marks a significant turning point in the emerging SNC-Lavalin affair. Just a day earlier, Prime Minster Justin Trudeau told reporters he continues "to have full confidence in Jody." He also insisted that he did not direct Wilson-Raybould to come to any specific conclusions on whether to direct the Public Prosecution Service of Canada to reach an agreement with SNC-Lavalin. "She confirmed for me a conversation we had this fall, where I told her directly that any decisions on matters involving the director of public prosecutions were hers alone," Trudeau said Monday. "I respect her view that, due to privilege, she can't comment or add on matters recently before the media. I also highlight that we're bound by cabinet confidentiality. In our system of governance, her presence in cabinet should speak for itself." Companies guilty of wrongdoing should be hit where it hurts — in their pockets, says business prof Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs calls out 'racist and sexist' treatment of Wilson-Raybould Trudeau says he has 'confidence' in Wilson-Raybould as ethics commissioner probes PMO over SNC-Lavalin Jody Wilson-Raybould was involved in legal government talks about fate of SNC-Lavalin, sources say Wilson-Raybould's resignation likely will cast a shadow over the upcoming election campaign. So will a recently-launched probe by the federal ethics commissioner. On Monday, Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion informed the NDP MPs who had requested an investigation that there is sufficient cause to proceed with an inquiry into Trudeau's actions in the case. Responding to a letter from NDP MPs, Dion said he would investigate the prime minister personally for a possible contravention of Section 9 of the Conflict of Interest Act, which prohibits any official responsible for high-level decision-making in government from seeking to influence the decision of another person so as to "improperly further another person's private interests." SNC-Lavalin faces charges of fraud and corruption in connection with nearly $48 million in payments made to Libyan government officials between 2001 and 2011. The company has pleaded not guilty. If convicted, the company could be blocked from competing for federal government contracts for a decade. The case is still at the preliminary hearing stage. With files from the CBC's J.P. Tasker CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices ---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:24 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can never deny that I tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and his latest client Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com< Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:29 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can never deny that I tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and his latest client Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre message sera examin? avec attention. Merci! L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle S?curit? publique Canada ********* Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed. Thank you! Ministerial Correspondence Unit Public Safety Canada On 3/5/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: > https://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > Jane Philpott resigns from cabinet, citing loss of 'confidence' over > government's handling of SNC-Lavalin > Treasury Board president leaves as controversy over political > interference in criminal case intensifies > Kathleen Harris · CBC News · Posted: Mar 04, 2019 3:11 PM ET > > 8436 Comments > > David Amos > @Jay Henryk "This is much bigger than Wilson-Raybould. Much bigger". > > YUP > > Federal Court File No T-1557-14 statement no 83 is wicked > > > David Amos > @David Amos opps T-1557-15 > > > Rick Poulter > @Jay Henryk > Funny how JWR never complained until she was transferred (yeah, > demoted) to Veterans Affairs - a full month after the SNC-Lavalin > court case started in earnest. Quitting cabinet but not the party > makes me think she is planning a palace coup. Especially since > Philpott's resignation. > Both are politicians and expect no political pressure in cabinet - that's > weird. > > > > David Amos > @Rick Poulter "Quitting cabinet but not the party makes me think she > is planning a palace coup. Especially since Philpott's resignation. " > > Trust that Trudeau, Butts and their cohorts know that I agree with > your thinking. > > Methinks the lawyers Catherine McKenna and Melanie Joly are clever > enough to follow Jody and Jane in making Humpty Humpty fall and secure > another liberal mandate with quite likely a lady for a leader N'esy > Pas? > > > > > https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ > > SNC Lavalin affair: Philpott and Wilson-Raybould aren't lifelong > Liberals, and some say that's the problem > Trudeau 'wanted the best and brightest from outside politics' for his > cabinet, says Susan Delacourt > CBC Radio · Posted: Mar 05, 2019 8:00 AM ET > > > 117 Comments > > David Amos > "The prime minister refuted her testimony, saying "I completely > disagree with the characterization of the former attorney general > about these events." > > Yea Right Methinks the dude may change his tune again N'esy Pas? > > https://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > A senior government official said one of the options being discussed > is for Trudeau to "show some ownership over the actions of his staff > and officials" in their dealings with his former attorney general, > Jody Wilson-Raybould. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. > Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:58:02 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I > feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest > you recall this email? > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member > of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. > > This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. > Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there > may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your > message will be carefully reviewed. > > To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within > the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. > > > > Thank you > > ------------------- > > Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de > Vancouver Granville. > > Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre > courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de > correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de > votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. > > Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, > veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, > votre adresse et votre code postal. > > > > Merci > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca > Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:58:02 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I > feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest > you recall this email? > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Thank you for contacting my office. This automated response is to > assure you that your message has been received by my office and will > be reviewed as soon as possible. > > Due to the high volume of correspondence received, I am not able to > respond personally to every inquiry. Please do not hesitate to contact > my office at the coordinates below should you have any questions > regarding the status of your query. > > Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of > Environment and Climate Change if it concerns topics pertaining to the > Minister of Environment and Climate Changes' role. For all future > correspondence addressed to the Minister of Environment and Climate > Change, I ask that you please write directly to > ec.ministre-minister.ec@ > > Best, > > Catherine McKenna, Member of Parliament, Ottawa Centre > > * * * > > Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqu? avec mon bureau. La pr?sente > r?ponse automatique vous est envoy?e pour vous informer que votre > message a ?t? re?u et qu'il sera examin? le plus rapidement possible. > > En raison du volume ?lev? de correspondance re?ue, je ne peux r?pondre > personnellement ? chaque demande. N'h?sitez pas ? contacter mon bureau > aux coordonn?es ci-dessous pour vous renseigner sur le statut de votre > demande. > > Veuillez noter que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de > l'Environnement et du Changement climatique s'il concerne des > questions qui ont trait au r?le de la ministre de l'Environnement et > du Changement climatique. Nous vous prions d'envoyer directement toute > correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de l'Environnement et du > Changement climatique ? > ec.ministre-minister.ec@ > > Cordialement, > > Catherine McKenna, d?put?e, Ottawa Centre > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca > Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:58:02 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I > feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest > you recall this email? > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Thank you for contacting the office of Sean Fraser, Member of > Parliament for Central Nova. > > This is to assure you that your email has arrived, and that we > appreciate hearing from you. > > If your matter is urgent, please contact our New Glasgow constituency > office toll-free at 1-844-641-5886 between the hours of 8:30-4:30pm, > and we will do our best to resolve your issue, or otherwise assist > you. > > Thank you and have a great day! > > New Glasgow > 2A-115 MacLean Street B2H 4M5 > Toll-free 1-844-641-5886 > 902-752-0226 > > Antigonish > 200-155 Main Street B2G 2B6 > 902-867-2919 > > Ottawa > 110 Confederation Building K1A 0A6 > 613-992-6022 > > Facebook: > facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<http > Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter. > Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www. > www.seanfrasermp.ca > > Toll free: 1-844-641-5886 > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> > Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:59:16 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I > feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest > you recall this email? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. > > If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical > support, please contact our Customer Service department at > 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. > > If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to > publiceditor@globeandmail.com< > > Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com > > This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and > press releases. > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 23:11:39 -0400 > Subject: YO Katie Telford do ya think your buddy Gerry Butts or anyone > else will recall this email by Wednesday? > To: "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Paul.Shuttle" > <Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, > "Michael.Wernick"<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca > <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, TCromwell@blg.com, catharine.tunney@cbc.ca, > "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. > "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts" > <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer" > <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, JagmeetForBurnaby > <JagmeetForBurnaby@ndp.ca>, "maxime.bernier" > <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "charlie.angus" > <charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>, "elizabeth.may" > <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "Hunter.Tootoo" > <Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca>, "tony.clement.a1" > <tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale" > <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" > <Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca > <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely" > <Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet" > <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> > <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre" > <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "jp.lewis"<jp.lewis@unb.ca>, > "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "David.Akin" > <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, > Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com> > > https://davidraymondamos3. > > > Tuesday, 12 February 2019 > > Jody Wilson-Raybould resigns from cabinet in wake of SNC-Lavalin > allegations > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:40 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can > never deny that I tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and > his latest client Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts? > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member > of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. > > This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. > Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there > may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your > message will be carefully reviewed. > > To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within > the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. > > > Thank you > > ------------------- > > Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de > Vancouver Granville. > > Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre > courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de > correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de > votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. > > Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, > veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, > votre adresse et votre code postal. > > > > Merci > > > https://twitter.com/ > > David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos > Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others > Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google > "David Amos Federal Court file No. T-1557-15" in order to sort out the > truth from fiction for themselves N'esy Pas? > > > https://davidraymondamos3. > > > #nbpoli #cdnpoli > > > https://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > > Jody Wilson-Raybould resigns from cabinet in wake of SNC-Lavalin > allegations > > > 236 Comments > > David Amos > Surprise Surprise Surprise > > > David Amos > And now the lady quits? Yea Right > > Trust that Mr Scheer and everyone else who sits in opposition know > that Jody Wilson-Raybould may have lost her mandate as Justice > Minister because of her failings in Federal Court and the Federal > Court of Appeal within my lawsuit against the Crown that was filed > when Harper was the Prime Minister and Mr Scheer was the Speaker. Need > I say that it irritated me bigtime when Jody appointed her Deputy > Minister to the bench of Federal Court not long after I argued their > minions in the Federal Court of Appeal? > > Methinks anyone can check my work by simply Googling two names "Jody > Wilson-Raybould David Raymond Amos" N'esy Pas? > > > David Amos > Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google > "David Amos Federal Court file No." in order to sort out the truth > from fiction for themselves. Its blatantly obvious that Mr Trudeau had > a duty to talk to Harper's Minister of justice and Peter MacKay and > had them pay particular attention to info found within statement 83 of > my lawsuit long before the election in October of 2015 > > Everybody knows why I am about to put the aforementioned matter before > the Supreme Court and file several more lawsuits in the Federal Court > against the RCMP and the CRA etc and also run for a seat in Parliament > again N'esy Pas? > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Randy.Boissonnault@parl.gc.ca > Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:57:12 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Minister Qualtrough RE "Litigation Lmbo" > Please enjoy an email that you and your fellow members of the PCO > ignored for way past too long > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Hello, > > Thank you for writing to my office. I value hearing from Edmonton > Centre constituents and stakeholders. Your email will be read. My team > and I will be happy to respond. > > This email is an automatic response to let you know that your > correspondence has been received. Please do not reply. > > As we prioritize responding first to residents of Edmonton Centre, > please provide your postal code, if you have not done so already. > > Should you need it, this link will help you confirm who your Member of > Parliament is: https://bit.ly/1BgbGyd. > > I will reply as soon as possible whether your issue pertains to you > personally or if you have written to me on a matter related to my > LGBTQ2 responsibilities or other legislative duties. > > If another government department or Member of Parliament can better > address your inquiry, we will forward your email to the appropriate > office and invite them to respond to you. > > Thank you again for writing to me. > > Kind regards, > > Randy Boissonnault > Member of Parliament for Edmonton Centre > Special Advisor to the Prime Minister on LGBTQ2 Issues > > E-mail: randy.boissonnault@parl.gc.ca< > Website: http://rboissonnault.liberal. > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/R. > Twitter and Instagram: @R_Boissonnault > > > ------------------------------ > > > Bonjour, > > Merci d'avoir ?crit ? mon bureau. J'appr?cie lire les ?lecteurs et les > intervenants d'Edmonton-Centre. Votre courriel sera lu et mon ?quipe > et moi serons heureux d'y r?pondre. > > Ce courriel est une r?ponse automatique pour vous faire savoir que > votre correspondance a bien ?t? re?ue. S'il vous pla?t ne r?pondez > pas. > > ?tant donn? que nous donnons priorit? aux r?sidents d'Edmonton-Centre, > s'il-vous-pla?t veuillez nous fournir votre code postal si vous ne > l'avez pas d?j? fait. > > Au besoin, le lien suivant vous aidera ? confirmer qui est votre > d?put?: https://bit.ly/1CyAl50 . > > Je vous r?pondrai d?s que possible si votre enjeux vous concerne > personnellement ou si vous m'avez ?crit sur une question li?e ? mes > responsabilit?s sur les enjeux LGBTQ2 ou ? d'autres t?ches > l?gislatives. > > Si un autre service gouvernemental ou un autre membre du Parlement est > dans une meilleure position pour r?pondre ? votre demande, nous > transmettrons votre courriel au bureau appropri? et les inviterons ? > vous r?pondre. > > Merci encore de m'avoir ?crit. > > Cordialement, > > Randy Boissonnault > D?put? d'Edmonton-Centre > Conseiller sp?cial du premier ministre sur les enjeux LGBTQ2 > > > E-mail: randy.boissonnault@parl.gc.ca< > Site internet: http://rboissonnault.liberal. > Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/R. > Twitter et Instagram: @R_Boissonnault > > > > > Jody Wilson-Raybould resigns from cabinet in wake of SNC-Lavalin > allegations > Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stressed Monday that he had 'full > confidence' in Wilson-Raybould > Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Feb 12, 2019 11:39 AM ET > > Jody Wilson-Raybould, the former Attorney General of Canada, has > resigned from cabinet. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press) > > > Jody Wilson-Raybould — the former justice minister who has kept > largely silent since a news report claimed the Prime Minister's Office > pressured her to help Quebec-based engineering firm SNC-Lavalin avoid > criminal prosecution — has resigned from cabinet. > > She tweeted a link to her resignation letter this morning. > > "With a heavy heart I am writing to tender my resignation as the > Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National > Defence," she wrote. > > > > > > Jody Wilson-Raybould ✔ @Puglaas > With a heavy heart I have submitted my letter of resignation to > the Prime Minister as a member of Cabinet... > https://jwilson-raybould. > … > > 1,873 > 12:34 PM - Feb 12, 2019 > > > > Statement from the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of > Parliament for Vancouver Granville |... > jwilson-raybould.liberal.ca > > > "When I sought federal elected office, it was with the goal of > implementing a positive and progressive vision of change on behalf of > all Canadians and a different way of doing poltics." > > Wilson-Raybould, who was shuffled to the Veterans Affairs portfolio in > January, has been under intense scrutiny since a Globe and Mail report > alleged last week that the PMO wanted her to direct federal > prosecutors to make a "deferred prosecution agreement" (DPA) to avoid > taking SNC-Lavalin to trial on bribery and fraud charges in relation > to contracts in Libya. > > Wilson-Raybould, who plans to stay on as MP for Vancouver-Granville, > has been quiet since the story broke, saying she can't comment because > she's bound by solicitor-client privilege. > > In her resignation letter, she said she has retained the services of > lawyer Thomas Cromwell, a former justice of the Supreme Court of > Canada, to advise her on "topics that I am legally permitted to > discuss on this matter." > > In an email to CBC News, Cromwell said he would not be making any > statements or doing any interviews. > > A spokesperson for MP Francis Scarpaleggia, chair of the national > Liberal caucus, said that as of Tuesday morning, Wilson-Raybould > hadn't left caucus. > > Ethics investigation launched > > Her resignation marks a significant turning point in the emerging > SNC-Lavalin affair. > > Just a day earlier, Prime Minster Justin Trudeau told reporters he > continues "to have full confidence in Jody." > > He also insisted that he did not direct Wilson-Raybould to come to any > specific conclusions on whether to direct the Public Prosecution > Service of Canada to reach an agreement with SNC-Lavalin. > > "She confirmed for me a conversation we had this fall, where I told > her directly that any decisions on matters involving the director of > public prosecutions were hers alone," Trudeau said Monday. > > "I respect her view that, due to privilege, she can't comment or add > on matters recently before the media. I also highlight that we're > bound by cabinet confidentiality. In our system of governance, her > presence in cabinet should speak for itself." > > Companies guilty of wrongdoing should be hit where it hurts — in > their pockets, says business prof > > Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs calls out 'racist and sexist' > treatment of Wilson-Raybould > > Trudeau says he has 'confidence' in Wilson-Raybould as ethics > commissioner probes PMO over SNC-Lavalin > > Jody Wilson-Raybould was involved in legal government talks about > fate of SNC-Lavalin, sources say > > Wilson-Raybould's resignation likely will cast a shadow over the > upcoming election campaign. So will a recently-launched probe by the > federal ethics commissioner. > > On Monday, Ethics Commissioner Mario Dion informed the NDP MPs who had > requested an investigation that there is sufficient cause to proceed > with an inquiry into Trudeau's actions in the case. > > Responding to a letter from NDP MPs, Dion said he would investigate > the prime minister personally for a possible contravention of Section > 9 of the Conflict of Interest Act, which prohibits any official > responsible for high-level decision-making in government from seeking > to influence the decision of another person so as to "improperly > further another person's private interests." > > SNC-Lavalin faces charges of fraud and corruption in connection with > nearly $48 million in payments made to Libyan government officials > between 2001 and 2011. > > The company has pleaded not guilty. > > If convicted, the company could be blocked from competing for federal > government contracts for a decade. > > The case is still at the preliminary hearing stage. > > With files from the CBC's J.P. Tasker > > CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:24 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can > never deny that I tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and > his latest client Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. > > If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical > support, please contact our Customer Service department at > 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. > > If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to > publiceditor@globeandmail.com< > > Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com > > This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and > press releases. > > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca> > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:29 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can > never deny that I tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and > his latest client Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la > S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile. > En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance > adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un > retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre > message sera examin? avec attention. > Merci! > L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle > S?curit? publique Canada > ********* > > Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of > Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. > Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence > addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in > processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be > carefully reviewed. > Thank you! > Ministerial Correspondence Unit > Public Safety Canada > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:40 +0000 > Subject: Autoreply > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Thank you for contacting my parliamentary office. This automated > response is to assure you that your message has been received and will > be reviewed as soon as possible, noting that constituents of Timmins - > James Bay will be given priority. Due to the high volume of > correspondence received, I am not able to respond personally to every > inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded items will not > receive a response. > > If you have submitted a request for assistance please insure you have > included your full name, your mailing address and daytime telephone > number. To reach my community offices directly, please contact: > > Timmins 1-866-935-6464 > > Kirkland Lake 1-866-504-2747 > > Cochrane 1-705-465-1315 > > Thank you kindly, > > Charlie Angus > > Member of Parliament for Timmins - James Bay > > Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec mon bureau parlementaire. La > présente réponse automatique vous est envoyée pour vous informer que > votre message a été reçu et qu'il sera examiné le plus rapidement > possible, la priorité étant accordée aux électeurs de Timmins - Baie > James. En raison du volume élevé de correspondance reçue, je ne peux > répondre personnellement à chaque demande. Dans la plupart des cas, > les lettres anonymes, copies conformes et pièces transmises resteront > sans réponse. > > Si vous présentez une demande d'aide, n'oubliez pas d'indiquer votre > nom au complet, votre adresse postale et votre numéro de téléphone > (jour). Pour joindre directement mes bureaux locaux, veuillez > composer : > > > Timmins 1-866-935-6464 > > Kirkland Lake 1-866-504-2747 > > Cochrane 1-705-465-1315 > > > Cordiales salutations, > > Charlie Angus > > Député de Timmins - Baie James > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:40 +0000 > Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your > message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments > and questions from constituents. > > I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email) > than the average MP. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis, > however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not > be able to respond personally to each one. > > My constituents in Saanich-Gulf Islands are my highest priority. If > you are a constituent, please email > elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca< > help me serve you better, please ensure that your email includes your > full name and street address with your postal code. > > > For meeting requests and invitations, please email > requests@greenparty.carequests >>. > > Thank you once again for contacting me. > > > > Elizabeth May, O.C. > > Member of Parliament > > Saanich - Gulf Islands > > Leader of the Green Party of Canada > > -- > > Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec moi. La présente réponse vous > confirme que votre message a été reçu. Les questions et les > commentaires des électeurs sont toujours les bienvenus. > > Je reçois une correspondance (postale et électronique) beaucoup plus > abondante que le député type. Tous les messages électroniques sont lus > régulièrement, mais, en raison de l'abondance des courriels reçus à > mon bureau, il se peut que je ne sois pas en mesure de répondre > personnellement à chacun d'entre eux. > > Mes électeurs de Saanich-Gulf Islands passent en premier. Si vous êtes > un électeur, veuillez écrire à > elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca< > Pour m'aider à mieux vous servir, veillez à ce que votre courriel > comporte votre nom complet, votre adresse municipale et votre code > postal. > > Pour les demandes de rencontre et les invitations, veuillez écrire à > requests@greenparty.carequests > > Je vous remercie encore d'avoir communiqué avec moi. > > > Elizabeth May, O.C. > > Députée à la Chambre des communes > > Saanich-Gulf Islands > > Chef du Parti vert du Canada > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:50:13 -0400 > Subject: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can never deny that I > tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and his latest client > Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts? > To: TCromwell@blg.com, catharine.tunney@cbc.ca, > Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. > Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, > JagmeetForBurnaby@ndp.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, > charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca, > Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca, tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca, > hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, > Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, > jp.lewis@unb.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, > steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. > Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:07:59 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE:: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HMQ - COURT FILE > NO.: A-48-16 , Attn Lorri Warner have you and your bosses talked the > RCMP and the FBI YET??? > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member > of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. > > This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. > Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there > may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your > message will be carefully reviewed. > > To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within > the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. > > > > Thank you > > ------------------- > > Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de > Vancouver Granville. > > Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre > courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de > correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de > votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. > > Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, > veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, > votre adresse et votre code postal. > > > > Merci > > > The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell C.C. > Senior Counsel > > Phone: 604.632.3460 > Fax: 604.662.5327 > TCromwell@blg.com > > https://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > Jody Wilson-Raybould resigns from cabinet after SNC-Lavalin allegations > > Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Feb 12, 2019 11:39 AM ET > > "Wilson-Raybould, who plans to stay on as MP for Vancouver-Granville, > has been quiet since the Globe and Mail story broke, saying she can't > comment because she's bound by solicitor-client privilege. > > In her resignation letter, she said she has retained the services of > lawyer Thomas Cromwell, a former justice of the Supreme Court of > Canada, to advise her on "topics that I am legally permitted to > discuss on this matter." > > In an email to CBC News, Cromwell said he would not be making any > statements or doing any interviews." > > > https://davidraymondamos3. > > > Tuesday, 26 February 2019 > > NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh claims victory in Burnaby South byelection > > > > David Amos > Methinks it should be fairly obvious as to why the lawyer Melanie Joly > who is our current Minister of Tourism, Official Languages and La > Francophonie is smiling N'esy Pas? > > https://rbendayan.liberal.ca/ > > "Rachel built a successful legal practice at Norton Rose Fulbright in > the field of litigation and international arbitration while also > teaching at the Faculty of Law of the Université de Montréal. She then > served as Chief of Staff to the federal Minister of Small Business and > Tourism, where she played a key role in developing the Liberal > government’s women’s entrepreneurship strategy" > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:21:06 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Maxime Bernier Lets see if there is an > ethical politcal soul in York-Simcoe before the 12th > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. > > If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical > support, please contact our Customer Service department at > 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. > > If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to > publiceditor@globeandmail.com< > > Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com > > This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and > press releases. > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario > <Premier@ontario.ca> > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:21:05 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Maxime Bernier Lets see if there is an > ethical politcal soul in York-Simcoe before the 12th > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly > valued. > > You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, > reviewed and taken into consideration. > > There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the > need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your > correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a > response may take several business days. > > Thanks again for your email. > ______ > > Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de > nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. > > Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en > considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons. > > Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère > responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de > la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours > ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre. > > Merci encore pour votre courriel. > > > > > Check out my last comment in CBC yesterday > > > https://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > Jody Wilson-Raybould says she's bound by 'solicitor-client privilege,' > won't comment on SNC-Lavalin scandal > > > Media report suggests PMO pressured former attorney general to > intervene in fraud case > John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Feb 08, 2019 10:33 AM ET > > > 5584 Comments > Commenting is now closed for this story. > > > Kim Luciano > No courage, no honor, no integrity. This is the mantle ALL Canadians > wear if we elect these people again. > > > > Curtis Garrick > Wow...the liberals have confirmed JWR was involved in government talks > about the fate of SNC-Lavalin. Confirming what I have been saying all > along, she used solicitor-client privilege in order to avoid saying > anything that may incriminate her client. Canadians deserve a full > inquiry on this. We need to know exactly who was involved, and exactly > what happened, and if necessary criminal charges should be applied. > > > > Arthur Gill > From other reports this is just the tip of the iceberg folks. > Much more to come. > > > > Joc McTavish > What's a Trudeau without preferred treatment for Quebec. > > > > Richard Riel > Wow Lavalin executives are all over this, it is their salaries, perks, > and bonuses, being argued with politicians for free taxpayers revenues > that many don't have whatsoever. > > > > David Amos > Obviously I am not anonymous Here is a scoop for you to research and > decide whether it be true or false > > Methinks anyone can check my work by simply Googling two names "Jody > Wilson-Raybould David Raymond Amos" N'esy Pas? > > Trust that Mr Scheer and everyone else who sits in opposition know > that Jody Wilson-Raybould may have lost her mandate as Justice > Minister because of her failings in Federal Court and the Federal > Court of Appeal within my lawsuit against the Crown that was filed > when Harper was the Prime Minister and Mr Scheer was the Speaker. > > Everybody knows I about to put that matter before the Supreme Court of > Canada and file several more lawsuits against the RCMP and the CRA etc > and also run for a seat in Parliament again. > > Methinks truth is stranger than fiction and anyone can easily Google > "David Amos Federal Court file No." in order to sort out the truth > from fiction for themselves. Its blatantly obvious that Mr Trudeau > should have paid particular attention to statement 83 of my lawsuit > long before he was elected in October of 2015 N'esy Pas? > > > David Amos > @David Amos Need I say it irritated me bigtime when Jody appointed her > Deputy Minister to the bench of Federal Court not long after I argued > his minions in the Federal Court of Appeal? > > > Richard Donald > On the loss of jobs in Quebec - Bridges still will get built . The > government will fund projects. The workers would get paid from Stantec > (Head office Edmonton) or some other company that does not do so much > bribery as part of their operation > > > > Joc McTavish > Just > Not > Ready. > > > Jenna Collins > If Wilson-Raybould refused to succumb to pressure from the PMO in this > instance I will have the utmost respect for her. > > > > > York--Simcoe (Ontario) > By-Election (Monday, February 25, 2019) > > This list of confirmed candidates was issued on Wednesday, February 6, > 2019. > > Click here for a printer friendly version. > Candidates in your electoral district Candidate name Status Party > name Office phone number Name of official agent Name of auditor > Dorian Baxter Confirmed Progressive Canadian Party (289) > 221-2687 > Joseph Fred Hueglin Ian Edmonds > Scot Davidson Confirmed Conservative Party of Canada (905) > 535-1115 William Greenberg Ben Seto > Robert Geurts Confirmed People's Party of Canada > Cody Murrell > Adam Delle Cese > Keith Dean Komar Confirmed Libertarian Party of Canada > (249) > 288-1188 Coreen Corcoran Stephane Blais > Mathew Lund Confirmed Green Party of Canada (705) 345-6288 > Rhonda > Joslin Stacey Campbell > Jessa McLean Confirmed New Democratic Party 1 888 881-4637 > Robert > Szollosy Gail Bergman > Adam Suhr Confirmed National Citizens Alliance > Kristin Lynn Suhr > Micheal Doyle > Shaun Tanaka Confirmed Liberal Party of Canada (905) > 895-0859 > Vaughan Moult Harry Mortimer > John The Engineer Turmel Confirmed Independent (519) > 753-5122 > Delahnnovahh Livingstone Stacey Campbell > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> > Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 20:44:51 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin > should go back to law school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and > Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. > > If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical > support, please contact our Customer Service department at > 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. > > If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to > publiceditor@globeandmail.com< > > Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com > > This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and > press releases. > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 16:44:43 -0400 > Subject: Fwd: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to > law school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler > Thompson? > To: premier <premier@gnb.ca>, attorneygeneral > <attorneygeneral@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, > "Sophia.Harris"<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "maxime.bernier" > <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer" > <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "elizabeth.may" > <elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "Kathleen.Harris" > <Kathleen.Harris@cbc.ca>, "scott.bardsley"<scott.bardsley@canada.ca>, > "scott.brison"<scott.brison@parl.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford" > <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katy.Bourne" > <Katy.Bourne@sussex-pcc.gov.uk > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:44:16 -0400 > Subject: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to law > school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler > Thompson? > To: info@jayshin.ca, jay@lonsdalelaw.ca, karenwang@liberal.ca, > lauralynnlive@gmail.com > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > jmaclellan@burnabynow.com, kgawley@burnabynow.com > > Jagmeet Singh on Tory opponent: 'Maybe he should go back to law school' > Conservative candidate Jay Shin said Singh was 'keeping criminals out > of jail' during his days as a criminal defence lawyer > Kelvin Gawley Burnaby Now January 13, 2019 10:27 AM > > Julie MacLellan > Assistant editor, and newsroom tip line > jmaclellan@burnabynow.com > Phone: 604 444 3020 > Kelvin Gawley > kgawley@burnabynow.com > Phone: 604 444 3024 > > Jay Shin > Direct: 604-980-5089 > Email: jay@lonsdalelaw.ca > By phone: 604-628-0508 > By e-mail: info@jayshin.ca > > Karen Wang > 604.531.1178 > karenwang@liberal.ca > > Now if Mr Shin scrolls down he will know some of what the fancy NDP > lawyer has known for quite sometime > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Singh - QP, Jagmeet"<JSingh-QP@ndp.on.ca> > Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:39:35 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the > upcoming hearing on May 24th I called a lot of your people before High > Noon today Correct Ralph Goodale and Deputy Minister Malcolm Brown? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > > For immediate assistance please contact our Brampton office at > 905-799-3939 or jsingh-co@ndp.on.ca > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca > Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:18:35 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Minister Ralph Goodale and Pierre > Paul-Hus Trust that I look forward to arguing the fact that fhe Crown > filed my Sept 4th email to you and your buddies > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If > your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please > forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or > burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored. > > The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of > services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has > become vacant. The party Whip supervises the staff retained under > these circumstances. > > Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of > Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will > continue to provide services to constituents. > > You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at > (604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway, > Burnaby BC. > > Office Hours: > > Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm > Friday 10am - 12pm > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com> > Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher > of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms > Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal > counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be > directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be > directed to 646-853-0114. > ______________________________ > This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate > thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity. > This email may contain information that is confidential and/or > proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used, > copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended > recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have > received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and > promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed > to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted, > corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses > or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not > guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for > any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in > any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates. > Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic > signature under applicable law. > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca> > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000 > Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia > To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Mr. Amos, > We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of > Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the > Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province > of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim > against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney > General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will > not be responding to further emails on this matter. > > Department of Justice > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca> > Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk > would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why > did she take all four copies? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have > little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau. > Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate > Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > I will be out of the office until August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du > bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016. > > > > > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 >> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., >> To: coi@gnb.ca >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >> Good Day Sir >> >> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed >> to speak to one of your staff for the first time >> >> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who >> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt >> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker >> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. >> >> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I >> suggested that you study closely. >> >> This is the docket in Federal Court >> >> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >> >> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings >> >> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ >> >> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ >> >> April 3rd, 2017 >> >> https://archive.org/details/ >> >> >> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal >> >> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >> >> >> The only hearing thus far >> >> May 24th, 2017 >> >> https://archive.org/details/ >> >> >> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity >> >> Date: 20151223 >> >> Docket: T-1557-15 >> >> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 >> >> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell >> >> BETWEEN: >> >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS >> >> Plaintiff >> >> and >> >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN >> >> Defendant >> >> ORDER >> >> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on >> December 14, 2015) >> >> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to >> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November >> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim >> in its entirety. >> >> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a >> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then >> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian >> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, >> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter >> he stated: >> >> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the >> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. >> You are your brother’s keeper. >> >> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former >> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to >> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of >> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses >> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to >> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime >> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former >> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of >> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; >> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former >> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff >> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court >> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired >> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted >> Police. >> >> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my >> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many >> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am >> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I >> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in >> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, >> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding >> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has >> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. >> >> >> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of >> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There >> is no order as to costs. >> >> “B. Richard Bell” >> Judge >> >> >> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment >> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent >> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. >> >> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court >> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the >> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my >> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? >> >> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the >> most >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca >> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM >> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in >> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to >> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you >> dudes are way past too late >> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à >> lalanthier@hotmail.com >> >> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à >> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca >> >> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at >> lalanthier@hotmail.com >> >> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to >> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca >> >> Thank you, >> >> Merci , >> >> >> http://davidraymondamos3. >> >> >> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war >> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to >> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over >> five years after he began his bragging: >> >> January 13, 2015 >> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate >> >> December 8, 2014 >> Why Canada Stood Tall! >> >> Friday, October 3, 2014 >> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And >> Stupid Justin Trudeau >> >> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide >> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. >> >> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien >> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign >> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to >> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were >> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were >> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth >> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for >> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” >> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. >> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not >> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a >> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to >> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was >> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But >> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s >> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s >> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, >> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle >> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway >> campaign of 2006. >> >> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then >> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the >> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, >> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. >> >> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling >> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of >> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners >> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a >> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. >> >> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have >> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. >> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by >> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is >> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of >> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government >> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this >> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a >> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. >> >> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror >> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” >> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, >> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The >> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and >> >> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of >> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have >> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical. >> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me. >> >> Subject: >> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 >> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca >> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> >> January 30, 2007 >> >> WITHOUT PREJUDICE >> >> Mr. David Amos >> >> Dear Mr. Amos: >> >> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, >> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. >> >> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have >> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve >> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Honourable Michael B. Murphy >> Minister of Health >> >> CM/cb >> >> >> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: >> >> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 >> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, >> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, >> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John. >> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has >> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not >> >> Dear Mr. Amos, >> >> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off >> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I >> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. >> >> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position >> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process >> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the >> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these >> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this >> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. >> >> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false >> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear >> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada >> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment >> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. >> >> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on >> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Warren McBeath, Cpl. >> GRC Caledonia RCMP >> Traffic Services NCO >> Ph: (506) 387-2222 >> Fax: (506) 387-4622 >> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> >> >> >> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., >> Office of the Integrity Commissioner >> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street >> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 >> tel.: 506-457-7890 >> fax: 506-444-5224 >> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca >> > > > On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please >> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob >> >> http://thedavidamosrant. >> ilian.html >> >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ >>> >>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must >>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING???? >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >>> >>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the >>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball >>> cards? >>> >>> http://archive.org/details/ >>> 6 >>> >>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/ >>> >>> http://www.archive.org/ >>> >>> http://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >>> Senator Arlen Specter >>> United States Senate >>> Committee on the Judiciary >>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >>> Washington, DC 20510 >>> >>> Dear Mr. Specter: >>> >>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >>> raised in the attached letter. >>> >>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap >>> tapes. >>> >>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously. >>> >>> Very truly yours, >>> Barry A. Bachrach >>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >>> >> > > http://davidraymondamos3. > > > Sunday, 19 November 2017 > Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes > It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before > The Supreme Court > > https://decisions.fct-cf.gc. > > > Federal Court of Appeal Decisions > > Amos v. Canada > Court (s) Database > > Federal Court of Appeal Decisions > Date > > 2017-10-30 > Neutral citation > > 2017 FCA 213 > File numbers > > A-48-16 > Date: 20171030 > > Docket: A-48-16 > Citation: 2017 FCA 213 > CORAM: > > WEBB J.A. > NEAR J.A. > GLEASON J.A. > > > BETWEEN: > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS > Respondent on the cross-appeal > (and formally Appellant) > and > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN > Appellant on the cross-appeal > (and formerly Respondent) > Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017. > Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017. > REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: > > THE COURT > > > > Date: 20171030 > > Docket: A-48-16 > Citation: 2017 FCA 213 > CORAM: > > WEBB J.A. > NEAR J.A. > GLEASON J.A. > > > BETWEEN: > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS > Respondent on the cross-appeal > (and formally Appellant) > and > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN > Appellant on the cross-appeal > (and formerly Respondent) > REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT > > I. Introduction > > [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos) > filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court > against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million > in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial > Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary > properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety > that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian > Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan > (Claim at para. 96). > > [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a > motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the > Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to > amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim > disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious, > and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the > Prothontary’s Order). > > > [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr. > Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal > Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr. > Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages > for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in > 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment). > > > [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the > Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status > Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016. > As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s > cross-appeal. > > > II. Preliminary Matter > > [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in > relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March > 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of > the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal. > This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed > had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this > Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with > several judges but did not name those judges. > > [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to > identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he > had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed > with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal > Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in > the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on > subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, > c. F-7: > > > 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her > office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the > jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of > Appeal. > […] > > 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour > d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que > les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale. > […] > 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of > that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the > jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court. > > 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la > Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les > juges de la Cour fédérale. > > > [7] However, these subsections only provide that the > judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice > versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal > Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this > section. > [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that: > 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court > — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of > Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is > continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and > for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as > a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. > > 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel > fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en > français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue > à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du > Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et > continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en > matière civile et pénale. > 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court > — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in > English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an > additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for > the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior > court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. > > 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de > première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « > Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est > maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et > d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit > canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant > compétence en matière civile et pénale. > > > [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create > two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court > (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal > Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no > need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by > Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation > to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to > file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a > decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents > that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that > appeal book. > > > [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on > March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which > Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a > conflict in any matter related to him. > > > [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion > before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the > conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal > Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if > Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal > Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. > Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this > cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this > Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court > will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought > before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in > relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court. > > > [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that > the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and > submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a > conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also > afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict > that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his > view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of > documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the > documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular > judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including > copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that > such judge had a conflict. > > > [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is > that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in > 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before > that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he > had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and > therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner > of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was > personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr. > Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he > was a member of such firm. > > > [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his > appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb, > focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at > Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at > the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this > particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this > lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were > after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax > Court of Canada over 10 years ago. > > | |
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III. Issue
>
> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV. Analysis
>
> A. Standard of Review
>
> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V. Conclusion
> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>