Sandpiper Shep returns to Dorchester perch amid questions & controversy
After a three year absence, Shep, the world’s largest semipalmated sandpiper, returned to the village square in Dorchester on Saturday, even though Tantramar town council has not approved installation of the giant statue or allocated money for it.
“I’m calling it The Dirty Bird,” says Bill Steele, who operates the Dorchester Jail Bed & Breakfast, only a stone’s throw from the statue.
“I mean it’s a great tourist draw and that’s good for me, but it’s being done without following proper procedures,” he says. “The village council didn’t commission the artist and never approved the project.”
Steele points out that when Dorchester was amalgamated with Sackville and three rural local service districts, the province drafted a budget that had no money in it for the sandpiper statue and the new town of Tantramar hasn’t approved any for it either.
“The statue was municipal property taken without any permission – repaired – and reinstalled without any public money,” Steele wrote in an earlier Facebook message.
He says he has filed a formal municipal code of conduct complaint against local Councillor Debbie Wiggins-Colwell raising “questions behind how our public asset got in the hands of private citizens with no authority in place.”
When reached by telephone, Councillor Wiggins-Colwell said she hadn’t heard about Steele’s formal complaint against her and emphasized that citizens were overwhelmingly behind the effort to get the statue back in the village square.
“I can say this has been an ongoing project for two years and finally Shep is here in a bird-friendly town where tourism is so important,” she said, referring further questions to Kara Becker, a former deputy mayor in the village who has been leading efforts to reinstate the statue.
“There’s a lot of community support,” Becker said during a telephone interview. “We’ve raised enough money to pay for Shep three times over.”
She notes that she appeared before Tantramar council on March 14th asking it to collaborate with citizens so that the statue could be restored in time for this year’s Sandpiper Festival and the return of the migrating shorebirds to the Bay of Fundy in August.
Although Mayor Andrew Black said he understood the economic importance of the statue and the desire to get it back, Becker complains that there was no follow up from the town and when she e-mailed later to ask about citizens donating to the project, she received this response from CAO Jennifer Borne:
At this time Tantramar is not able to accept financial donations or any donation that requires a tax-receipt post-reform as a result of the formation of a new entity. In addition to this, Tantramar Council has not accepted this particular project.
“So, we just went ahead and put the statue back because it’s so important to us,” Becker says. “It’s pretty much the only thing we have.”
Meanwhile a report from the Canadian Press news agency quotes an e-mailed statement from Mayor Black:
“The municipality of Tantramar and its council did not commission this work to be done nor request or approve the installation of this statue on municipally owned land.”
The news agency report, carried by Global news, adds that when Black was asked if the statue would be removed, he replied that the matter won’t be discussed until municipal offices reopen on Tuesday.
“I predict it will be taken down in the next few days,” Bill Steele tells Warktimes.
But Kara Becker warns that protesting citizens would be out in the streets waving placards to defend it.
To read the full report from the Canadian Press, click here.
For an extensive CHMA background report as well as information about Oromocto artist Robin Hanson, who created the $9300 statue of Shep, click here.
13 Responses to Sandpiper Shep returns to Dorchester perch amid questions & controversy
YO Higgy Methinks Mayor Andy Black and his buddy Billy Steele know they ain't fooling many folks in Dorchester N'esy Pas?
Mitton, Megan (LEG)<Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca> | Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 3:00 AM |
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
(le français suit) This brief message is to let you know that your email has been received. Thank you for reaching out and sharing your comments and concerns with me. If this is an urgent matter, please call my Constituency office: (506) 378-1565 or the Fredericton office: (506) 457-6842. For media inquiries please contact (506) 429-2285. - - - Ce bref message a pour but de vous informer que votre courriel a bien été reçu. Je vous remercie de m'avoir contacté et de m'avoir fait part de vos commentaires et de vos préoccupations. S'il s'agit d'une question urgente, veuillez appeler mon bureau de circonscription : (506) 378-1565 ou le bureau de Fredericton : (506) 457-6842. Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le (506) 429-2285. Megan
Mitton (elle / she, her) Députée de Memramcook-Tantramar |
Responsable en matière de la santé, le logement, le changement climatique, et les droits humains. MLA for Memramcook-Tantramar | Advocate and Critic on files including Health, Housing, Climate Change, and Human Rights. Le Nouveau-Brunswick est situé sur les territoires traditionnels, non cédés des Mi’kmaq, Wolastoqiyik & Peskotomuhkati. | New Brunswick is situated on the unceded traditional territories of the Mi’kmaq, Wolastoqiyik & Peskotomuhkati. |
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 3:00 AM |
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Andrew.Holland@natureconservancy.ca, Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, a.black@sackville.com, dan.murphy@umnb.ca, b.phinney@sackville.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "bruce.wark"<bruce.wark@bellaliant.net>, jean-francois.leblanc@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, TheBirdist@gmail.com, macxjack@gmail.com, hansonartgallery39@gmail.com | |
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, jborne@dorchester.com, d.beal@sackville.com, b.goodwin@sackville.com, m.beal@sackville.com, Eric.Hanson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca | |
Tantramar council votes not to remove Dorchester’s sandpiper statue
Sandpiper Shep will stay on her perch in Dorchester’s village square after Tantramar council voted unanimously tonight not to remove her.
At the same time, council directed the town engineer to confirm that Shep was installed safely “with the understanding that the statue is not a municipally owned asset at this time.”
“I want to make it clear that leaving the statue in place increases the town’s risk,” Mayor Andrew Black told council.
“It puts the Town of Tantramar at an insurance and liability risk.”
Black said that in his opinion, protecting the public purse and lessening or mitigating risk are two of the most important roles of members of council.
He was commenting on the fact that the sandpiper statue was not commissioned either by the village of Dorchester or the town of Tantramar and was installed Saturday on municipal property by private citizens without authorization.
CHMA reports that Robin Hanson, the Oromocto artist who created the new fibreglass Shep, says he was approached by former Dorchester Mayor Debbie Wiggins-Colwell acting on behalf of local volunteers who later raised the money to pay for the $9300 statue.
During tonight’s Tantramar council meeting, Mayor Black said “it sets a precedence of a lack of respect for the decision-making process.”
He also said it threw the process for requesting proposals and quotes for municipal projects “out the window” in violation of laws such as the provincial procurement act and the town’s procedural bylaw.
“Normally, something like this would go through a process and we would in fact own that piece of property, but we don’t, so we had to try to figure out the best way to approach that,” Black told reporters after tonight’s council meeting.
Meantime, Councillor Wiggins-Colwell said she could not comment at this time.
Dorchester resident Bill Steele told Warktimes on Saturday he has filed a formal, municipal code of conduct complaint against her.
Tantramar Mayor Andrew Black blocks a vote on who will be his deputy
In a move that surprised many observers, Tantramar Mayor Andrew Black prevented council from electing a deputy mayor at its first meeting on Tuesday.
“We have just sat as the new council of the Town of Tantramar,” Black said.
“We have not had an opportunity to interact with one another. I would like us to be able to know each other and have an understanding of who we are as councillors and as council, before we make the decision of who would be the deputy mayor,” he added.
Black was responding to a motion from Councillor Debbie Wiggins-Colwell who sought to add the election of deputy mayor to Tuesday’s council agenda.
She pointed out that the bylaw governing council procedures requires it to elect a deputy mayor at its first meeting.
However, changing the agenda requires unanimous approval, and after all other councillors had voted to change it, Black asked clerk Donna Beal: “Do I vote as well?”
In the past, Sackville mayors have voted only to break council ties, but the new procedural bylaw imposed by the province allows the mayor to vote on every issue.
“I will vote nay,” Black declared defeating the motion to add the election of deputy mayor to council’s agenda.
However, he told reporters later, that he’s uncomfortable with the bylaw that gives the mayor a vote and would rather provide information and guidance.
“Voting on an issue I think, it’s just not me, it’s just not what I would want to do,” he said.
Black added, however, that it will be up to council to change the bylaw.
“I might have my own ideas about what I would like to see,” he said, “but if council passes the bylaw saying that the mayor should vote, then so be it.”
Black said the election of a deputy mayor could take place at council’s next meeting later this month.
7 Responses to Tantramar Mayor Andrew Black blocks a vote on who will be his deputy
So, the rookie Mayor subverts the will of Council as his first act. It seems according to the Mayor, that Council will only be able to play with the toys after showing they get to know each other. Or does his preferred candidate for Dep not have the requisite votes yet? I wanted to reach out to Mayor and Council on this issue but their Town email addresses were not publicly available as of this writing. All this bravado about “ready to get to work” after the swearing in last month, was really what?
I believe you have nailed it once again Mike. You’d have to be from another planet to not know who he will try to get the position of deputy. He knew that something had been in the works I’m sure and had put a bandage over it for a couple weeks. I sure hope these new councillors can see past this and get a deputy elected other than the one obvious pick he would make. Definitely a bad look early for those who voted for him. Maybe a look at what’s to come.
“If I get stoned and sing all night long, it’s a family tradition” Hank Jr…,
The Local Governance Act has always indicated that the Mayor has a vote unless otherwise determined by the local government under their procedural by-law. This, as we know, is a new Local Government which now serves a new Town so things have changed and there is a new way of conducting this local government’s business that better aligns with local governments throughout the province.
I am sure UMNB is well aware of this need to ensure more uniformity in having local governments conduct their business in order to ensure delivery of services to their residents.
Maybe the issue here is not who implemented the bylaw, or when a mayor can vote, it is the requirement for a unanimous vote by council to add an item to the agenda.
Lots of learning for this new Mayor and Council as it tries to disengage from how business used to be done in the former local governments and how it will need to be done in the new local government.
Local Governance Act
Voting
66(1) Subject to this Act, each member of council present at a meeting shall announce his or her vote openly and individually, and the clerk shall record it, and no vote shall be taken by ballot or by any other method of secret voting, and every vote taken in that manner is of no effect.
66(2) Despite subsection (1), a local government may, in a procedural by-law made under paragraph 10(2)(a) or in a municipal charter or private or special Act of the local government, provide that the mayor shall not vote except to have a casting vote in the event of a tie.BY-LAW NO. 2022-03
A BYLAW RESPECTING THE PROCEEDINGS OF TANTRAMAR MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND COMMITTEE MEETINGSXIII. MOTIONS
11. After the Mayor has counted the vote, the Mayor shall declare whether it was “carried”, “carried unanimously” or “defeated”. Except where provided for in this bylaw or by the applicable legislation, a majority vote of the Members present who are eligible to vote, shall decide a motion or question before the Council. If the vote results in a tie, the motion will be considered defeated.And so the meek has inherited (in his mind) the earth. Let the games begin!
His Worship has demonstrated himself to be a person who is perhaps a bit too picky about who he works closely with, and not picky enough about who he alienates…
Perhaps. He spent his time as Councillor as part of a solid voting bloc and no one, including local media raised an eyebrow. Now that two of his allies are no longer there, he seems to attempt to revive that arrangement by trying to form an alliance on the new council (with those that are like minded). He gratuitously thanks the Rural Health Action Group (where his principal campaign advisor thankfully volunteers) but painfully ignores any credit whatsoever to Horizon Health. He’s called out both the NS and NB govts for remaining silent on the Chignecto Ithmus issue – these are levels of govt to work with in the future. I truly hope he grows into the job but past behaviour seems to indicate that he more interested in performative advocacy and empty gestures.
https://warktimes.com/2023/01/
Tantramar Town Council says no to holding a public question period
At its first meeting tonight, Tantramar Town Council voted against amending its agenda to allow members of the public and media to ask questions.
The agenda did not include the public question period that has been a tradition in Sackville for at least 30-years because the new council was operating under a procedural bylaw imposed by the province.
Councillor Michael Tower moved a motion, seconded by Councillor Allison Butcher, calling for a public question period to be added to the agenda.
“I would like to add at the end of the meeting a question period for the public or the press to maintain our transparency,” Tower said.
He suggested that during the recent municipal election campaign, candidates had spoken in favour of openness.
“I think losing this question period takes away transparency,” Tower added.
The motion to amend the agenda to include a public question period required unanimous consent. Councillors Debbie Wiggins-Colwell, Matt Estabrooks and Bruce Phinney voted no.
Mayor Black then explained that the new council was operating under a bylaw imposed by the province.
“I’ve heard that it’s pretty much standard across the province,” he said, adding that the new council can now look at its bylaws “and potentially change them if we need to.”
During an interview later, he said that he personally favours holding a public question period, but that council itself would have to make that decision.
Communications officer
CAO Jennifer Borne told reporters after the council meeting that Tantramar will be reviewing its bylaws.
“If there’s any potential amendments, any feedback that comes in, certainly any information will go into the files for potential amendments going forward and council can review them,” she said.
In an earlier e-mail to Warktimes, Borne wrote that Tantramar welcomes public and media interest in local government.
“Under the new organizational structure, we will have a Corporate Communications position that will be dedicated to providing information to the media and public on decisions of council,” she added.
She later assured reporters that the new communications officer would not replace the council question period, but would create opportunities for public engagement and feedback.
A step backward
Mount Allison Professor Geoff Martin, who specializes in the study of local governments, wrote in an e-mail that “it’s a real step backward not to have a question period, an outrage even.”
Martin, who served on Sackville Town council from 1998 to 2004, adds it gives citizens a chance to question the people they elected.
“This is supposed to be the order of government closest to the people, and the only one that ‘does not rule on behalf of the King,'” he added.
“This is supposed to be a democratic government, not a soulless corporation.”
7 Responses to Tantramar Town Council says no to holding a public question period
Why have a question period? We’re in Sackville New Brunswick, where we don’t care what people think. We’ll tell them what they should think.
In fact, meetings shouldn’t even be open to the public.
This would eliminate the need for elections, too!
Sackville, where Council questions You!!
We are off to a flying start. So much for election promises. Of course, there should be a public question period at the beginning and end of every council meeting.
Virgil – as a former Councillor, what are your thoughts on the Mayor delaying the vote to appoint a Deputy Mayor?
Oh sure… but I still remember when you were town councillor raising some questions about the amount of smartgrowth being built in the centre of town by John Lafford and how your fellow town councillor Margo T. King “shushed” you from speaking… oh Virgil.. those were the days… early 2011 I believe… could have even been late 2010… the culture of shushing only got worse.
OK folks! A little juvenile
Council is supposed to be directing the agenda not the provibce or the Mayor. In politics perception ls everything and not having a question period because the province mandated it as a starter bylaw , and besides others are doing it, sounds might mean the $1200 a day carpet bagger Chad Petersons is calling the tunes. But council gets one more chance to communicate to the provincial government that you do not plan to be mere creatures of provincial governments. Does this mean that when the actual budget that is due in March will also be shoved down your throats like your just another advisory committee? The day the finances are tabled you need to demand that the province know that it will be open to the public and not editorialized by the Mayor otherwise be prepared to either resign en mass or spend four years being part of an illusion presented to you as local governance.
Ummmm the Deputy Mayor???
In the former Village of Dorchester, the councillor with the highest number of votes is offered the position. Otherwise council elects the Deputy Mayor. The Mayor appoints portfolios but does not appoint a Deputy Mayor; but if he desires an inclusive council, the mayor might suggest council nominate a councillor from the former LSDs .The party has started. You have been elected by us to serve citizens, not bureaucrats. It is unfortunate that you are in one of the top three corrupt states in North America as mentioned at a MtA guess speaker that deals with these matters. I Think it was a Mr. Bowser who lives in Riverview. Tantramar might want to hire him just so my new identity starts with a clean slate. Get your brooms out.I have read the new bylaw and under presentations it is noted that an individual or group can address council. So there is an opportunity to ask questions.
IX 4 does note individuals or groups wishing to address council by appearing at the meeting with no previous registration should sign in at the door and will be called in the order they register. They will be given 2 minutes each. It does not say you can not ask questions and it appears that it would ensure that the time is well spent for questions and answers, as opposed to using question periods as soap boxes.
As for the media asking questions, not sure why continuing on with the informal media scrum that was always happening can not still take place. Maybe a more formally media scrum could be organized by media and members of council could make themselves available after the meetings.
Again this is not about what the mayor calls a provincially imposed bylaw. It is about doing business differently in order to be more effective in addressing community service needs and concerns. This is a new process and it must be given time to work and councillors and mayor must be supportive in helping it along.
Proper communication will be needed so residents understand the process and are able to address council in a public meeting.IX. PRESENTATIONS
1. The Presentations portion of a Council meeting shall provide an opportunity for individuals to appear as a formal delegation or on their own to make brief presentations to Council on matters within the subject matter jurisdiction of Council.
2. All individuals or groups wishing to address Council and wishing to be listed on the meeting agenda should register with the Clerk at least seven (7) calendar days prior to the date of the meeting, providing their name, topic of concern, and indicating whether there has been any previous contact with a member of Council or Administration regarding the matter. The Clerk will be responsible for preparation of the Council Report Form, if required, for all registered presentations from members of the public. In order to ensure system compatibility and that Members receive all required materials in advance of the meeting, any presentations requiring the use of audio/video technology must be submitted to the Clerk at least three (3) business days prior to the date of the meeting, otherwise they will not be accepted for use at the meeting.
3. Registered presentations shall be limited to five (5) minutes each, followed by questions from Members if applicable. When individuals wish to appear before Council during a Public Hearing, their presentation shall be limited to five (5) minutes.
4. Individuals or groups wishing to address Council by appearing at the meeting with no previous registration should sign in at the door and will be called in the order they register. No audio-visual presentations will be permitted for unregistered presentations. Unregistered presentations shall be limited to two (2) minutes each, followed by questions from Members if applicable.Thanks Shawn. It’s nice to have the facts laid out rather than read sensational articles that mislead the public.
UPDATED: Goodbye Dorchester Village, Hello Ward 1: hope & dismay
With the Village of Dorchester about to disappear, local candidates for the new Tantramar town council are talking fondly of Shep, the sandpiper statue that once stood as a symbol of village identity.
“Shep’s been gone now for a couple of years,” says Deputy Mayor Robert Corkerton, one of two candidates competing for the single seat in Ward 1 that includes Dorchester and surrounding communities.
“It got to the point where Shep was rotten right through,” he says, adding that the village council has explored various options for replacing Shep.
“People come to Dorchester to see the sandpipers when the birds are here, but also to stop and see Shep, the same as the lobster out in Shediac,” he says.
“He’s been there for 20 years and people want him back.”
Dorchester’s Mayor Debbie Wiggins-Colwell, who is also running for the Ward 1 seat on Tantramar council, says she’s been talking with the sculptor who created the original, wooden Shep as well as artists in Calgary who work with more durable materials.
“I’m looking at two options, either the Calgary group that would do it in fibreglass or we’re looking at bronze, the same as [George] Stanley is in Sackville,” she says.
“I’m hoping maybe the bronze will be our option, but that’s something we have to work towards,” Wiggins-Colwell adds.
Both candidates suggest they would take up the need for a new Shep at Tantramar town council after it takes office on January 1st.
They say the sandpiper statue is crucial not only for Dorchester’s sense of itself, but also for its ongoing appeal to tourists who flock to the Nature Conservancy’s shorebird reserve at nearby Johnson’s Mills to witness the birds’ annual August migration.
Identity loss
But even as the candidates talk about the symbolic and practical need to restore Sandpiper Shep, voters in the village and the small communities around it, worry that Dorchester is about to be lose its identity anyway as the village is swallowed up by the larger and richer town of Sackville.
“I’ve actually heard it said from people in Sackville, when the amalgamation process started, that ‘We don’t want Dorchester,'” says Neil Harris, a retired salesman who returned home to the village three years ago after a 48-year absence.
“My concern is that some people in Sackville are just going to sweep us aside,” he says.
Harris’s concern is shared by Wayne Feindel who served for more than 30 years on the village council — his last three terms as Dorchester’s mayor.
“This community will not be run and looked after the way it is now,” he says.
“Dorchester is a tightly run organization [and] with no money, they’ve done miraculous things,” Feindel says.
“There’s no way this bigger group will be able to run this community as well as it was done even with more money to the people who are running and to the mayor, a nice little bribe to try to get people involved, but you have to have something deeper than that if you’re going to run for your community,” he says.
(Feindel’s “nice little bribe” refers to the tripling of salaries for elected representatives on Tantramar’s new council.)
As Sackville becomes the “centre of gravity” in the new municipality, he says the focus will inevitably shift to it.
“A town with so many resources, with doctors and lawyers and people in every field and stores and all that, they have no sense of anything beyond Sackville and I don’t see that changing overnight.”
When combined with the growth of centralized bureaucracy in an expanded Southeast Regional Service Commission and with only one representative on council, Feindel foresees the disappearance of volunteers rooted in the local community.
“The volunteers are just not going to be here, like with the Sandpiper Festival and stuff like that,” he says.
Dorchester will become “a soulless place,” he predicts.
Hope for a bright future
But Tantramar Ward 1 candidate Debbie Wiggins-Colwell says that Dorchester getting swallowed up by Sackville isn’t a worry for her, at least not yet.
“I don’t look at it that way, you know,” she says, adding that all parts of Tantramar can collaborate and work together.
“That’s how I’m looking at it, going into it,” she says.
“Now maybe you ask me this at the end of three years, it might be entirely different, but right now, that’s how I look at it.”
Wiggins-Colwell says she foresees a future in which natural beauty and community-run events like the Shiretown and Sandpiper Festivals combine to bring the citizens of Tantramar together.
“I mean we’re not even 13 kilometres from Sackville,” she says, adding that the round trip on Rte. 935 from Dorchester to Rockport and Wood Point is stunningly beautiful.
“That’s my happy place,” she says. “I love it.”
Cross promotion is key
Candidate Robert Corkerton is also hopeful as he points out that the village has already built a solid set of stairs and railings in anticipation of Shep’s return along with crowds of tourists eager to pose for photos on the newly built platform beside him.
He says his 16 years on the village council would help guide his efforts to help promote the many attractions in the new town including the Nature Conservancy shorebird reserve, Sackville’s Waterfowl Park and Farmers Market, Fort Beauséjour as well as the ice cream and other attractions at Trueman’s Blueberry Farm.
“We have such an opportunity to say, ‘What do we have? How can we promote this? Where are our air B&Bs, where are our hotels and motels and what can we do to cross-promote everything?’
“What can we do to bring people here to Tantramar?” he asks. “How can we make it a destination spot, so people will want to come in and spend their money here?”
‘Losing out’
With election day only three weeks away, it remains to be seen which of the two hopeful candidate messages will resonate most with voters in Dorchester and its surrounding communities.
Aaron Stright, who recently returned to the Dorchester area after 10 years away working as a welder in Alberta, says he’s not optimistic at all because Sackville will be the centre of the new town.
“Most of the people in Sackville don’t seem to have Dorchester’s interests in mind,” he says.
“We’re stuck out on the side and nobody really wants to think about us and now they’re going to be controlling more of what goes on here,” he adds.
“A lot of people are worried about losing out because Sackville’s going to get more than we do.”
All-candidates forum
Both Robert Corkerton and Debbie Wiggins-Colwell appeared at the all-candidates forum held on Saturday, November 12 in Middle Sackville.
Here is Robert Corkerton’s two-minute opening statement:
I’m a resident of the current Village of Dorchester and have lived there for the past 20 years. I live there with my wife Lise and our four children. I’m originally from England and moved to Montreal when I was a young child. This is where I learned French and I’m fully bilingual. For the past 16 years, I’ve had the honour of being a member of the Council of the Village of Dorchester. Over that time, I’ve worked on different portfolios, and the constant being recreation programming and playing fields. I’ve served on the the board of Recreation New Brunswick as representing the village, a provincial NGO for the recreation in the province. I’m currently in my 20th year serving as a leader in Scouts Canada having held different positions throughout the years. I’m a volunteer with the Dorchester Food Bank and new as of this year, I’m also the director for the junior programs for the Moncton Black Tide Rugby Club. I’m looking to serve because I feel the experience on council and other boards and my understanding of governance workings will be an asset to help bring Tantramar into existence and set it on a good path for the future.
Here is Debbie Wiggins-Colwell’s opening statement:
I am the last mayor for the Village of Dorchester and first female mayor also. I’ve lived in Dorchester for over 50 years, raised three of my children there, had owned my own business and my husband and I opened a second business in the village square of Dorchester. I am now retired. I have many years of volunteering under my belt, most recently, including the founding board member of the Greater Dorchester Moving Forward and in 2017 was honoured by receiving the Molly Kool Award for Outstanding Contributions by a woman in the southeast part of New Brunswick. And I am now ready to serve as first councillor for Ward 1.
To read Debbie Wiggins-Colwell’s campaign brochure, click here.
To read Robert Corkerton’s campaign brochure, click here.
To listen to Erica Butler’s CHMA interview with Debbie Wiggins-Colwell, click here.
To listen to Erica Butler’s CHMA interview with Robert Corkerton, click here.
8 Responses to UPDATED: Goodbye Dorchester Village, Hello Ward 1: hope & dismay
Great article as usual Bruce. It is also worth mentioning that everyone in the new town has a vote for mayor–if you live outside the old town of Sackville boundaries, make them earn your vote. In my experience, one smart person can make a lot of difference on a council of 9. Whoever wins this ward seat, you will have your constituents behind you to make sure that all areas of the new town get their share. Use your voice and vote and deny unanimity and silence if your constituents are being ignored. Early on, like in the City of Miramichi in the 1990s, insist that municipal assets in Dorchester be used instead of being sold and centralizing everything in Sackville. Maybe a town department should be located there, for example. With technology it is even easier now…
I agree.
It did not take long for incomplete information to get posted in the local election.
The facts about “Shep” not being replaced by the Village administration are far more than a case of “Rotten Wood.” Already the candidates failed to state the replacement process was begun by the previous Village Administration in 2019 and was not completed in a timely manner before other issues arose which ensured the demise of the 20 year old village icon.
As a member of the Sandpiper Festival’s organizing committee, I was asked in 2019 to arrange for the shipment of the statue of “Shep” to Fredericton for repairs before the winter set in.
I proceeded to follow the committee’s request and the artist was contacted and agreed the timing was right, transport was arranged and all that was needed was for the Village Administration to arrange for the equipment to lift the statue off the foundation and place it on a truck I had available, which they had agreed to do.
With my part done, I waited until January 2020, at which time I was informed by the Village Administration, not the festival organizing committee, that they were taking over the project.
The statue sat there for months before it finally was shipped for repairs. After further investigation, it was determined that, because of the delay in shipping and being outside through another winter, the statue was deemed unrepairable.
The Village Administration made the decisions behind closed doors and what we have today is a beautiful podium and a very expensive project that could have been avoided. Now the administrative and financial discussions and decision making will begin all over again. All of which could have been avoided.
On the positive side, Ward 1 now has the largest and sharpest looking outdoor, all-weather podium in the entire province of New Brunswick. It is my hope that the “Shep Podium” will attract Activists, Political and Social Speakers where they can mount and declaim their aspirations to the large crowds that will visit Ward 1 to hear them and have their pictures taken as past visitors did for 20 years of “Shep’s” existence in the community square.
This is just a small issue, but I’m wondering if more accurate and creditable information will be presented pertaining to bigger issues in the future.
Thanks for telling the whole truth about that Max. I think often the toxic positivity spin applied by government is what puts constituents off the most. Elected officials need to tell the whole truth and take responsibility when they make mistakes.
I have been very impressed by the newsletters put out by Greater Dorchester Moving Forward Co-op. The variety of endeavors undertaken is truly inspiring. I hope that the energy behind Moving Forward will make sure Dorchester is not left out in the new municipal organization.
“Most of the people in Sackville don’t seem to have Dorchester’s interests in mind,” he says…. Not with me as Mayor, this is my home. I ran because I don’t want the smaller communities being overlooked and I thought that might end up being the case. I run the Westmorland Historical Society, in Dorchester. No one should feel like their community’s identity is going to be lost.
The Town of Tantramar is a collective of different villages and towns to be honest… economically speaking the government just wanted a tighter control of governance so just consider this is an opportunity to co-mingle with like-minds in the area instead of feeling separate and distant you are part of a larger body of homies… I find it amusing how ‘identity’ is tied up in postal codes.. maybe its because I have lived in other places in Canada and in England.. this area is ready to bloom… just enjoy the journey together and don’t worry so much… Bonnie Swift will make a fine mayor for this new entity as I think she brings a more common sense approach to the job and I will vote for her and Bruce Phinney and Wendy Epworth and look forward to seeing how this new body of representatives takes this as an assignment to take the reigns for the region as a collective of homies… these are people with more in common than they might think and there is going to be some really good collaborations taking place. Please stay positive and don’t let the “Eeyores” out there get you down.
Collaborations ordered from the top down in good old teutonic fashion by corporate directors is not a cooperative adventure. It is corporatism or as defined by John Ralston Saul ‘facism’. The Unconscious Society .
Bonnie Swift promises as Tantramar mayor to end secrecy, promote citizen engagement
Bonnie Swift says she decided to run for mayor of the new town of Tantramar because she wants to end the secrecy that has prevailed in Sackville’s local government.
“Actually, it was the biggest thing that motivated me to run, get the information to the people,” she said yesterday during an interview with Warktimes.
“I want the public to know what their town is doing and how they’re managing everything inside that town.”
As one example of secrecy, Swift points to the $28,000 Montana report on how to end bullying, harassment and favouritism in the Sackville fire department that has never been released to the public.
“I want to see the Montana report, what I can see, what I’m allowed to legally see, I would want to see,” she says, adding that the town government has been too closed.
“I mean that report is probably under lock and key in some CAO desk somewhere,” she says.
“If something’s not functioning right or people are being harassed and abused, as a mayor, I would want to know about that.”
Swift also says firefighters need better protection as whistleblowers.
“Whistleblowers are very important to the functionality of everything,” she says, “and I really didn’t like the silencing of the fire department.”
Swift notes that under Sackville’s whistleblower policies, firefighters are expected to report their concerns to senior management even when those managers may be causing their problems.
“As Mayor no whistleblowers will ever be silenced,” Swift writes in her platform document entitled “Fighting for Open Government.”
‘Citizen engagement’
Bonnie Swift addressing Sackville council last June
Swift’s platform position on “citizen engagement” partly reflects the circumstances that led to her appearance before Sackville town council last June as a member of Concerned Citizens.
The 35-member group called unsuccessfully on council to re-open a zoning change clearing the way for the AIL plastic pipe plant on Walker Road.
Concerned Citizens pointed out that residents of the area were not notified about the development before council held a public hearing on the zoning change before finally approving it.
In her mayoralty platform, Swift writes it’s a good example of the municipality’s poor citizen engagement process.
“One of the largest developments, if not the largest development, is currently happening in our town, yet almost none of the citizens in the region knew about it until the massive 18-acre clear cut took place,” she writes.
During our interview, Swift criticized town council for failing to do any research in order to answer residents’ questions about the potential effects on groundwater, air emissions or traffic in the area.
“I think, because the council is the first line of defence, you can’t rely on other levels of government, it’s your responsibility to keep the community safe, to keep the environment safe and to take care of public welfare,” she says.
“So, if you are not doing that, you’re not representing the people.”
Swift promises that if she’s elected mayor, “these types of inadequate practices will stop” because “poor engagement creates a lot of distrust with both the Council and the developer.”
Drive-thrus
Swift points in her platform to what she calls the “double standard” on climate change.
In 2001, Sackville town council passed a bylaw banning any further fast-food drive-thrus next to the TransCanada highway, a ban that it re-affirmed in 2016.
“I don’t think it’s fair to prevent a small business from expanding or having a drive-thru due to idling cars if you are going to have large manufacturing facilities go in without questioning their environmental footprint,” she writes referring, for example, to greenhouse gas emissions from the manufacture of plastics.
“Nobody in our council ever asked what the climate footprint of the plastics plant would be,” she says.
“We should have fair processes that evaluate everything, everything should be put under a climate lens, big business, small business, whatever comes into town; if we’re going to have a climate lens for this, let’s put everybody under it fairly or nobody under it at all.”
Fracking
Swift does not mention fracking for shale gas in her platform, but during our interview, she said that as an environmental engineer, she knows that the public has received a lot of misinformation about it over the years.
That’s why she paid for a full-page ad on fracking in the Sackville Tribune-Post in 2012.
“I believe people should know the truth,” she says. “I worked on 1,200 fracked wells in groundwater protection and so, I know the industry.”
Swift says the critics had never worked on even a single shale or natural gas well.
“So, I thought who better to get the actual good, bad and ugly out about this industry,” she explains.
“I wanted people to know what’s involved, what we do to protect the environment and what the real risks are…
“I’ve never had to remediate a site because of fracking, ever.”
Swift acknowledges that there are some risks to fracking, mostly because of surface contamination, but says industry practices have now minimized those risks.
“I certainly don’t believe you should be fracking in the middle of a town, but if there’s remote locations where they’re developing wells, you know, there’s a possibility then,” she says.
“Is fracking right for Sackville?” Swift asks. “I don’t know. If people don’t want it, they don’t want it, but they should know everything about it before they make that decision.”
Update
Bonnie Swift visited her hometown of Dorchester on November 1st to talk to about 25 people who attended the Tuesday Neighbour Café at the Moving Forward Co-operative on Station Street.
“This is what a community should look like, I don’t want smaller communities like Dorchester to be ignored,” she said.
“I have an ear and as mayor, I would listen.”
Swift grew up in Dorchester, one of six children in a working class family.
To read more about her background as well as her position on issues such as the hospital and heath care crisis, affordable housing and climate change as outlined in her 10-page campaign platform document, click here.30 Responses to Bonnie Swift promises as Tantramar mayor to end secrecy, promote citizen engagement
Excellent! Thanks Bruce and Bonnie – lovely to see a very ethical lady running!
Thanks so much Kata.
It’s great that we have a capable third candidate for Mayor. Recent news, reported by Erica Butler at CHMA radio, is that the advisory committee secretly recommended to the provincial “facilitator” in August that the new Tantramar mayor and councillor salaries be TRIPLED over the current Sackville rate. This recommendation has been accepted and presumably this will be inserted into the 2023 Tantramar budget by the facilitator. This is new spending of well over $100,000 per year.
One of the things that I will be looking for in candidates is for them to say “this is wrong and if I am elected we will re-examine it and hopefully a majority will agree to roll it back to something more reasonable.” In 2024 at least, if 2023 is now set in stone (thanks to Higgs and Allain).
If Bruce will indulge me ….
Hefty raises on the way for new Tantramar mayor and council » CHMA: https://www.chmafm.com/welcome/hefty-raises-on-the-way-for-new-tantramar-mayor-and-council/Bonnie Swift’s platform for Mayor of Tantramar is a refreshing, articulate statement of principles that bespeak a candidate who will dedicate herself to transparency in all circumstances that permit it. This is clearly someone who will work with Council to restore the democratic functioning of our local government. It is time that the citizens of Tantramar have a trustworthy Mayor and Council who together will work to guarantee, to the extent possible, an honest, open and respectful environment for the difficult years ahead dealing with the downloaded financial burdens imposed by the provincial government.
Wow,finally someone who is ethical and will represent what is best for the welfare of the community .Making good decisions based on doing the research and what is the right choice for the safety and health of the community is a challenging job. ..Here is a candidate that is willing to put the hard work and an honest approach into what is right and best ,not try to sneak things in that benefit certain people that have a hidden agenda that is self serving.Bonnie would be a very good asset to a step in the right direction for this community.They would be fortunate to have someone of her rare integrity and calibre as Mayor of Tantramar!
I read your article but I only see that Bonnie is running for Mayor of Sackville.There is no mention of Dorchester and the other areas that make up the new Tantramar region. She only talks about what she will do for Sackville.
We live in Middleton and if our taxes are going to increase I want some, at least a fraction of the money go to other areas besides Sackville.
Since moving here 8 years ago we are seeing a revitalization of the Dorchester area with new farming (Willow Farms, Homestead Farms, etc), B&Bs, plus Greater Dorchester Moving Forward Co-operative & Station 8 Community Fridge to name a few. Recently the Dorchester Daycare Center had to move to a new location because it had out grown it’s original space. This means there are new people moving to the area. Many older homes are being renovated for instance Lady Smith Manor and several residences in Dorchester & Middleton.
Dorchester wants to be known as a place for people to come, stay and enjoy what it has to offer and not as a Drive Thru community.
So I would like to hear what Bonnie & the other candidates are going to do for Dorchester & area and remind them that we are a part of the region as well as Sackville. We want our “share of the pie and not just the crumbs.”
We may not have the population of Sackville but we have heart and care about our community!I believe that the point of the newly named united “entity” of Tantramar is based on relative distribution of population, I fail to see how Bonnie Swift’s platform can be construed to be detrimental to any one of the five communities that make up the township of Tantamar. The new town councillors will need to work together to ensure the needs of the whole are equitably met in all its parts. Remember that the four units outside Sackville proper have four voices on council, equal in numbers to the four voices of the the Sackville councilors. In other words, the four outlying communities have the same weight and voice as the community of Sackville.
You might like to know that Bonnie Swift is from Dorchester and is one of the old school women — she has common sense and wisdom and kindness on her side… I like her… I know her husband.. these are sound thinking people. We could do a lot worse on this first Tantramar mayor’s run… think hard about what you want for your area and work towards it with others — we are literally all building this new world, not the politicians… stay positive! Thanks for your comment.
Thanks, Kata, I really don’t get Carolyn comments. I grew up in Dorchester, I am the President of the Westmorland Historical Society in Dorchester. I pour tons of volunteer hours into Dorchester every year. As President of the WHS, I manage the Keillor House and St. James Church. We also host numerous and large events in Dorchester all the time. Also manage historical properties like the Bell Inn and the Payzant Card. Our society host the public library in our Payzant card building. Currently, I am the only Mayoral Candidate who is actively engaging in Dorchester and has been for years. I work with Meriam Andrews at the Lady Smith on various town activities all the time. We are on the same board.
I grew up in Dorchester, I am the President of the Westmorland Historical Society there. I pour tons of volunteer hours into that community as their President. I manage the Keillor House and St. James Church. We also host numerous and large events in Dorchester all the time. I also manage the Keillor House Museum and St James Museum as well as many of the historical properties like the Bell Inn and the Payzant Card. Our society hosts the public library in our Payzant card building. I am speaking at Dorchester moving forward tomorrow. It would have helped to ask me Candidates before posting something like this. I am the only Mayoral Candidate who is actively engaging in Dorchester and has been for many years. I work with Meriam Andrews at the Lady Smith on various town activities all the time, we are on the same board. Ask the Citizens like Alice Folkins about me, she was volunteer of the year there and we work together continuously. Dorchester in my hometown and I care about it deeply. Dorchester is one of reasons I ran. I don’t want smaller communities being ignored.
Interesting that Bonnie Swift is both for (pipe plant) and against (fracking) the precautionary principle. Not always possible to have it both ways in public office.
Wrong she didn’t say that. She said she is for all industrial development when done right. She is against the lack of public engagement with the citizens and the double standards this town applies when evaluating small and large business for climate change. Since most of the citizens up there didn’t know about the plastic pipe plant, she is pretty bang on about that. If you read her platform that should have been abundantly clear.
So she’s pro fracking? Great. Just what we need…
I worked on Nova Chemicals Polyethylene plant in Joffrey, AB. It is one of the biggest manufactures of polyethylene thermoplastics in Canada. The only difference was the town, and the developer actively engaged the citizens. Whereas the citizens of Sackville had no clue what was happening until they saw, an 18-acre clearcut and people started to ask what is happening here? After working on hundreds of industrial developments across western Canada this was one of worst examples of citizen engagement in a small town I have ever seen. It’s the town’s public engagement processes I am concerned with, not the industry. When you are an engineer consulting firm you do not pick and choose who you work for, you work for all types of industries. The town did the citizens a huge disservice and the backlash they are getting is well deserved.
There is usually no point to trying to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their own ignorance, but I’ll give try. Hydro-fracking is a common engineering practice that environmental engineers use remediated contaminated sites when contaminants are bound to heavy soils. Water well drillers will use it to increase the flow rate of water wells. It’s used in mining as well. It’s used in numerous industries. It is a necessary engineering tool for many types projects. Look up hydrofracking for remediation.
Wow Bonnie, that’s a pretty harsh response. I’m surprised someone who hopes to represent us all as mayor is so quick to get in a flame war with a constituent. I’m not sure I can support that kind of behaviour in a mayor. Would you?
She’s just what we need. She speaks in facts and they were being rude. We have bigger issues than hydro-fracing that the town banned in 2012 anyway. It is a moot point to even talk about it. Everything else she wants to achieve is bang on.
Ignorance? Really, Bonnie? We know (as in, that is the scientific consensus) that the industry vastly understated the amount of methane that escapes into the atmosphere from fracked wells. And how pernicious, if shorter-lived, a GHG is methane? Very. And what about the chemicals that are shot down into the earth along w sand, etc.? We can’t even learn what these are because the industry claims this info as proprietary. Sounds like a good case for the precautionary principle, as most NBers agreed when they turfed-out the Alward government.
Tim would probably instruct his students to protest fracking and pipelines and oil sands and energy projects that aren’t solar panels and windfarms … but Tim would never mention a peep to his students about how wrong it is that so much Saudi oil flows into New Brunswick.
I agree and we take more oil from Saudi Arabia every year. From a Country with no human rights, no women’s rights and no environmental rights.
If you read my article in 2012 than you would have known that all chemicals are all pretty much food and household grade now. I posted a list of ones used and there are only about a dozen.They are only applied at 0.1%. There is nothing proprietary about them at all. Oil and gas is regulated by the province it has absolutely anything to do with municipal government. Plus, why would you assume I am for us against any industry? I am for the proper facts and information getting to the public so they can make wise decisions. I clearly said this industry is up to the people. If people don’t want it they need to speak to their MLA’s this has nothing with our municipal government the provincial government issues the licenses for this industry.
On another note here are all the the additives.Soooo proprietary. Not!
-Calcium chloride (food preservative)
-Xamthagum polymer (food additive used in gluten free baking)
-Sodium bicarbonate (common baking soda)
-Polyamide fatty acid blend (fatty acid blend similar to linseed oil)
-Carboxymethyl cellulous (food thickener used in ice cream, also used in toothpaste)
-Bentonite (a fine clay soil used also used in kitty litter)
-Barite (used in barium drinks for X-rays of the digestive tract )
Base oils (environmentally sensitive synthetic oil)
-Calcium hydroxide (lime used in lawn fertilizer and cement)
-Sodium Hydroxide (used food curing)Just because something is safe as a food additive doesn’t make it safe to drink. Salt being an easy example.
The water is not left in the ground all the water is pumped back out of the steel and concrete well casements and then taken to treatment facilities. So why would any have to drink it? That makes no sense. These casings to protect the groundwater are 4 feet of steel and concrete and pressured tested before operations to ensure they don’t leak.
In reading your platform I see no mention of any other areas except Dorchester and Sackville. Living in neither of these communities can you explain what you are going to do if elected as mayor for the other communities now becoming a part of Tantramar. Midgic, Middle Sackville, Westcok, Point de Bute, Jolicure etc ?
Thanks Karen, I am contacting the reps from these areas so I can get out to present to them. I will be in Baie very soon. I will post the date. I am speaking with other ward candidates as well. On my “Bonnie Swift for Mayor” Facebook page. I will be providing those dates. What ward are you in?
I appreciate the response. Ward 5
I am very pleased to see that a third person has taken up the challenge to run for mayor this is important to all the communities involved.Im afraid for years that a lot of these issues have not been handled on a consistent basis and a lot of issues seem to be based on who wants what.One that really needs more input is our volunteer fire fighters jumping out of bed at 3 or 4 am m/f to respond to life saving calls be respected and treated in a professionally manner with respect .Thank you for your service
I have been speaking to several firefighters and I will be fighting for them. They know I have their backs.I will be taking up this issue up. Don’t you worry they are one of my top priorities. They will not be ignored by me.
https://www.chmafm.com/
This is one more example of ‘bikeshedding’. Elected officials should focus on the important stuff (like climate change) but instead waste time on fibreglass birds.
https://whatsthepont.blog/2011/11/06/bikeshedding-prospering-in-your-committees-parkinsons-law-of-triviality/
Great little video Harold as it certainly relates to the lack of communication and discussion with citizens and councillors here in town with major projects, like the current $5 million flood mitigation project that is about to get underway.
The plans, as drawn, will effectively reverse the Industrial Park area storm water flow by sending it towards town and into the existing water holding pond adjacent St James Street. That major fact was not revealed by the consultant.
The project will also enable siltation to totally seal off the outlet at Aboiteau AB-01, behind Russell Metals that discharges into the Tantramar River, within the first year, because the existing flow of flushing storm water will be taken away.
We will then only have ONE working aboiteau, that being the undersized AB-02 behind Armtec, to evacuate storm water from our downtown area. Methinks this is ‘bikeshedding’ at it’s best when $5 million is being spent on a project that will only worsen our possibility of storm water flooding and so little time is being spent actually having this very expensive project explained to anyone.
Now back to BIG BIRD!
Everything is art and art is everything.
I think most locals realize that this complaint is just the result of a sore loser.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. Let’s get real. Move the bird to another place. Bigger fish to fry. No, make that birds not fish.
Sandpiper Shep has driven the council Koo Koo . There is no turning back from Koo Koo .
Is this a case of citizens overriding council? Well, perhaps and so be it as council refuses to listen and rather enjoys dictating.
A tempest in a teapot! Just another example of casuistry employed to bury historic realities. The construction and seating of the now iconic Shep was instituted under the authority of the Village of Dorchester ‘s Village Council, long before Premier Higg’s municipality act reconfigured the landscape of New Brunswick, bolstered by its removal of the new entities’ powers to self-govern in full (such as barring citizens from asking questions at Council meetings!)
When Shep was unseated for concerns about its decay, the monument was still within the authority of the Village Council. And, I would daresay, was the idea to replace it. Little did the villagers expect that they would be left bereft of seeing that aspiration realized by the political maneuvering of their provincial government. Let’s imagine, for example, that the Sackville water tower were to be tumbled by a tornado. Would the township of Tantramar be forbidden from proposing a replacement of the crucial infrastructure? Yet the once independent town had provided one half the cost of the $2,430,242 project.
The point is that the refurbished Shep has a right to be put back on her throne, and I for one, would be happy to help to see that happen, as I suspect a number of others in the area would be so inclined. Not a donation! A restoration! Just the way it was and should be. Down with casuistry!
Peter – Thank you. That is exactly the point.
People, people people ! What are you thinking? :”Shep” the sandpiper is more than bronze, wood or fiberglass. Shep didn’t even star in the 1965 movie THE SANDPIPER, about a cross-cultural; marriage. Shep isn’t even about Jessica Glasner’s timeless World War Two story the Voyage of the Sandpiper.’ Shep in fact represents three decades of the whole village of Dorchester striving to protect and promote their unique place in history. Shep is indeed the result of hard work, many meetings, a school auditorium filled with everyone, and of every age from Rock Port to Breau Creek. A total commitment from a tri cultural village mostly shunned by Sackville and even recorded in the former Town of Sackville’s Town meetings. The impetus and the work of involved citizens kept councilors and their mayor darting back forth like the Sandpipers at Johnson’s Mills . Then one day the tide came in for the Village.. It is a certain irony that the Sandpiper Festival was launched by controversy ranching from a cartoon of the Mayor promoting a “leviathan piper:” to be erected in the square to international rage that the famous Sandpiper Stew would include actual sandpipers. Finishing off by assuring everyone that there also was no Mud from Johnson’s Mills in the mud pie desert.. Today due to no small part transmitted through the internet the image of Shep Dorchester is part of the Fundy Biosphere Reserve includes the local local school as a UNESCO sponsored educational site helping maintain the world class foot print that Doug Howe wrote for the Reader digest. In the year 2017 Federal and provincial governments chose Dorchester to celebrate the 150th Anniversary. At a historical heritage fair where five Dorchester students won the staggering amount of $700 dollars for their Bi-centennial essays. If if you can erect a bronze Cattail statute. I think SHEP even If just fiberglass deserves a place in local history. The Dorchester D-Day Dodgers who when serving on village council meetings around a couple of card tables all the while debating with great dissonance to prove who was right, but how to protect the truth. I know by the 1970’s my Dad and others were wondering if winning was worth the price they paid.. Duty and self reliance coupled with courage and loyalty now substituted by actions that involved replacing what worked with what sounded good. This is for another day_ EDUCATION.
Totally off topic, but I just saw your name. I’m assuming you are the teacher Mr. Feindel. I was a student of yours in the late ’90s in Dorchester and just wanted to say thank you for everything you did while I was a student. I loved your classes!
Lynsey you are most welcome. Those days were the best of times because students like yourself were very self reliant and had solid footing to leap forward into the world. Junior high high was the best fun ever. Take care
Terrific to see the good people of Dorchester take the initiative and instal their bird. Well done. I am fan of this worthwhile artwork [no plaques about climate change needed]. There is definitely money to cover costs for installation – lots and lots of money right? Remember what Mayor Shawn Mesheau was quoted as saying:
““We are setting the foundation for the generations to come. How exciting is that!” declared mayoralty candidate Shawn Mesheau. “Our population will be 9,100 and our tax base $1 billion.” Maybe we should get this little quote made in to fridge magnets to distribute throughout Tantramarshire.