Federal government met the threshold to invoke Emergencies Act: Rouleau
Report calls out policing failures and Ontario's inaction during an 'unsafe and chaotic' protest
"Lawful protest descended into lawlessness, culminating in a national emergency," he wrote in his highly-anticipated report, tabled Friday in the House of Commons.
"Invocation of the Emergencies Act is a drastic move, but it is not a dictatorial one."
The document sheds new light on one of the most controversial decisions ever made by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's government. On Feb. 14, 2022, Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act to end the protests that had blocked downtown Ottawa's streets for nearly a month.
The protesters were angry with the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including vaccine requirements.
It was the first time the law had been triggered since it was created in 1988.
By invoking the act, the federal government gave law enforcement extraordinary powers to remove and arrest protesters, and gave itself the power to freeze the finances of those connected to the protests. The temporary emergency powers also gave authorities the ability to commandeer tow trucks to remove protesters' vehicles from the streets of the capital.
The law defines a national emergency as a situation that "cannot be effectively dealt with under any other law of Canada." Further, a public order emergency can only be invoked when there is "a threat to the security of Canada" as defined by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act.
Justice Paul Rouleau releases his report on the Liberal government's use of the Emergencies Act, in Ottawa, Friday, Feb.17, 2023. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
"In my view, there was credible and compelling information supporting a reasonable belief that the definition of a threat to the security of Canada was met," Rouleau wrote in his executive summary, which runs to more than 200 pages.
"I have concluded that cabinet was reasonably concerned that the situation it was facing was worsening and at risk of becoming dangerous and unmanageable."
Rouleau's report largely exonerates Trudeau regarding his decision to invoke the Emergencies Act. But the prime minister does not escape criticism.
For example, Rouleau said Trudeau's reference on Jan. 27 to some protesters as a "fringe minority" likely inflamed the situation and hardened protesters' resolve.
He also concluded that federal consultation with the provinces was "adequate" but "could, and likely should, have been better."
Ontario government's response was 'troubling'
His report makes 56 recommendations to improve intelligence sharing, police response to wide-scale protests and the Emergencies Act itself.
Rouleau reserved some of his most blistering remarks for the Ontario government.
"I find the Province of Ontario's reluctance to become fully engaged in such efforts directed at resolving the situation in Ottawa troubling," he said.
Rouleau said Premier Doug Ford and his cabinet did not properly respond to a crisis in a city in their jurisdiction.
Commissioner Paul Rouleau said Premier Doug Ford and his cabinet did not properly respond to a crisis in an Ontario city subject to their jurisdiction. (Greg Bruce/CBC)
"Given that the city and its police service were clearly overwhelmed, it was incumbent on the province to become visibly, publicly and wholeheartedly engaged from the outset," wrote Rouleau, a justice of the court of appeal for Ontario.
He wrote that moments of urgency require leaders of governments at all levels "to rise above politics and collaborate for the common good."
"Unfortunately, in January and February of 2022, this did not always happen," he wrote.
The Ottawa Police Service also gets poor marks from the justice, who wrote that if city police had properly assessed the information and intelligence at their fingertips, it "would have told a different story."
He said the city police response was marred by a lack of proper planning, intelligence failures and internal dysfunction.
While Rouleau takes aim at some of former Ottawa police chief Peter Sloly's leadership choices and decisions, he also said that it would be too easy to attribute all of the shortfalls and errors to him.
"As well, some errors on Chief Sloly's part were unduly enlarged by others, to a degree that suggests scapegoating," he wrote.
Rouleau praised the Windsor police, the Ontario Provincial Police, the RCMP and the City of Windsor for learning from the mistakes of the Ottawa police.
Rouleau says situation could have been avoided
During six weeks of testimony last fall, the Public Order Emergency Commission heard from more than 70 witnesses, including cabinet ministers and protesters.
Rouleau wrote that the "spark" for the early 2022 protests was more than two years of COVID-19 restrictions and the federal government's decision to require that commercial truck drivers be vaccinated in order to enter Canada.
Growing distrust in government in certain segments of the population, coupled with government responses to COVID, "exacerbated" this pre-existing dynamic.
Rouleau said he accepts that COVID-19 had a profound impact on Canadians and they had a right to to lawfully protest what they saw as government overreach.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appears as a witness at the Public Order Emergency Commission in Ottawa, Friday, Nov. 25, 2022. Trudeau defended the government's use of the act in his testimony. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
"I do not accept the organizers' descriptions of the protest in Ottawa as lawful, calm peaceful or something resembling a celebration," Rouleau wrote.
"The bigger picture reveals that the situation in Ottawa was unsafe and chaotic."
He also dismissed the organizers' claims that they were unaware of acts of harassment and intimidation directed at local residents.
Ultimately, Rouleau wrote, "it is regrettable that such a situation arose here, because in my view, it could have been avoided."
WATCH | Ottawa's convoy protest, from start to finish
With files from JP Tasker
So there you have it, dare not speak out against the great man.
How many people died during this protest? How many government agencies collapsed? We all know the answer, none. So a few people lost sleep for several nights, well, that might happen in a democracy. But Canada, is now clearly seen to be no longer a democracy.
Trudeau's use of Emergencies Act during "Freedom Convoy" justified, inquiry rules | FULL
The Trudeau government met the “very high threshold” for invoking the Emergencies Act for the first time in Canadian history during the “Freedom Convoy” protests in Ottawa last year, the inquiry commissioner has ruled. In the over 2,000-page report, Justice Rouleau called the “Freedom Convoy” a “singular moment in history” exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as online misinformation and disinformation. While there was failure in policing, Rouleau said the ‘Freedom Convoy” protests and response can also be seen as a “failure of federalism.” Trudeau took the unprecedented step to invoke the Emergencies Act – the successor to the controversial War Measures Act – on Feb. 14, 2022. By that time, the convoy protest in Ottawa was grinding into its third week, and like-minded protests had popped up at Canada-U.S. border crossings in Windsor, Ont., and Coutts, Alta.666 Comments
Emergencies Act inquiry: Trudeau speaks after use of powers deemed appropriate | LIVE
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, along with Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland, will speak after the government was cleared for invoking the Emergencies Act for the first time in Canadian history during the so-called “Freedom Convoy” protests in Ottawa last year. In the over 2,000-page report, Justice Rouleau called the “Freedom Convoy” a “singular moment in history” exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as online misinformation and disinformation. While there was failure in policing, Rouleau said the ‘Freedom Convoy” protests and response can also be seen as a “failure of federalism.”NDP MPs react to the Emergencies Act inquiry’s final report – February 17, 2023
Automatic reply: Frank Au can never deny that I gave Commissioner Paul Rouleau the benefit of my doubt before his report goes public
Frank Au can never deny that I gave Commissioner Paul Rouleau the benefit of my doubt before his report goes public
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:22 AM |
To: Frank.Au@ontario.ca, "Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, rob.stewart@ps-sp.gc.ca, "Nathalie.G.Drouin"<Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, marcel.beaudin@opp.ca, jeffery.hutchinson@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Thomas.Carrique@opp.ca, pat.morris@opp.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, jdp@tdslaw.com, joel@joelharden.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "pierre.poilievre"<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, shantona@papechaudhury.com, leonj@bennettjones.com, edann@edlaw.ca, gpoliquin@ovcounsel.com, pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl.gc.ca, Patrick.Brazeau@sen.parl.gc.ca, george.furey@sen.parl.gc.ca, larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, nrodriguez@conwaylitigation.ca, mduckett@dsscrimlaw.com, srp@tdslaw.com, mtsurumi@legalanalysis.ca, tcurry <tcurry@litigate.com>, kris.austin@gnb.ca, rokaku8@gmail.com, patrickking <patrickking@canada-unity.com>, jcarpay@jccf.ca, traversy.n@gmail.com, kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, cvangeyn@theccf.ca, christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca | |
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, dominic.cardy@gnb.ca, rick <rick@petersoncapital.ca> | |
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Au, Frank (MAG)"<Frank.Au@ontario.ca> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:27:39 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Re Urgent Consultation To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. I am away on a secondment until Spring 2023, and do not have access to emails. If you require assistance, please call 416.326.4600 and ask for the Duty Crown. Thank you. https://www.cbc.ca/news/ |
As Emergencies Act report tabled, key witnesses have moved on
Public Order Emergency Commission to release findings later today
As the Public Order Emergency Commission (POEC) prepares to release its highly anticipated report into last winter's convoy protests, many of the witnesses from the City of Ottawa and the Ottawa Police Service who testified last fall have either left or moved to new roles.
On Thursday, the commission announced it would make its final report public later today after tabling it in Parliament.
The Canadian Press reported the commission had requested, and been granted, an extension to the original Feb. 6 deadline for submitting its final report to the government.
The deadline for tabling the report in Parliament — Feb. 20 — remained intact, however. That meant the commission's findings and recommendations had to be made public no later than Monday, the Family Day statutory holiday in Ontario.
(The timeline set out by the Emergencies Act requires that the report be submitted to Parliament and released to the public within 360 days of the emergency declaration being revoked, which occurred on Feb. 23, 2022.)
Former Ottawa Mayor Jim Watson testifies before the Public Order Emergency Commission on Oct. 18, 2022. Watson did not run for re-election. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
Mayor, councillors gone
The commission heard from 76 witnesses over six weeks of public testimony, from Oct. 14 until the prime minister's appearance on Nov. 25. Of those, seven were either elected officials or senior bureaucrats with the City of Ottawa, and five more were senior members of the Ottawa Police Service (OPS).
None of the elected officials from the city who testified — former mayor Jim Watson, former councillor and police services board chair Diane Deans, and former councillors Mathieu Fleury and Catherine McKenney — remains in office. Of those, only McKenney ran for re-election last fall, but failed in their bid to become mayor.
Of the other city officials who testified, only Kim Ayotte, Ottawa's general manager of emergency and protective services, remains in the same job.
Former city manager Steve Kanellakos, who testified about his efforts to broker a deal between police and the protesters, resigned amid controversy on Nov. 28, just two days before the release of a damning report on Ottawa's troubled LRT project.
Watson's former chief of staff Serge Arpin left with his boss, customary practice among political staffers.
Deputy Chief Steve Bell, now chief administrative officer of the Ottawa Police Service, waits to appear before the Public Order Emergency Commission on Oct. 24, 2022. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)
All 5 OPS witnesses remain
All five senior members of the Ottawa Police Service who testified before the commission last fall remain, though most have changed jobs. (This doesn't include former chief Peter Sloly, who resigned during the occupation of Ottawa by convoy protesters, and who had been out of policing for more than eight months by the time he testified before the commission in late October.)
Steve Bell, who was named interim chief after Sloly's resignation, and who oversaw the eventual dispersal of the protest in Ottawa, is now a deputy chief and chief administrative officer of the OPS. At the time of the convoy's arrival in Ottawa, Bell was in charge of intelligence, information and investigation for the force.
Patricia Ferguson, who testified to the deep "dysfunction" at the top of the OPS, and said the force was left "floundering" when protesters failed to leave the capital after the first weekend, remains acting deputy chief.
Russell Lucas, an inspector with the police service's special events section during the protests, is currently an acting superintendent, according to an update provided by the OPS on Thursday.
Supt. Robert Bernier, an inspector within the force's communications branch who was appointed event commander during the occupation, is also listed by the OPS as an acting superintendent.
Supt. Robert Drummond, who was tasked with overseeing the police liaison team that negotiated with protest leaders and the public order unit that eventually helped end the occupation, also maintains that rank. (Drummond was in an acting role at the time of his testimony last fall.)
Police and protesters square off in front of Parliament Hill on Feb. 19, 2022. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)
'Multiple points of failure'
In an email to CBC, Paul Champ, a lawyer who represented downtown residents and businesses during the Emergencies Act inquiry, noted the commission heard "extensive evidence of multiple points of failure" by both government officials and police.
"Even though many of those responsible have left the stage, the POEC report will memorialize those mistakes and serve as a guide for public officials going forward. I would also like to see some apologies by the police, the city and the province, but that's probably asking too much," Champ wrote.
He said he also hopes to see the report provide some guidance "about the oversight and direction the Ottawa Police Services Board can have over the Ottawa Police Service."
Journalists covering the inquiry will be allowed to peruse an embargoed version of the report starting at 10 a.m. ET. The embargo will be lifted once the report is tabled in Parliament.
Commissioner Paul Rouleau will also read a prepared statement, which will be streamed live on the commission's website, where the full report will be made available to the public.
Automatic Reply
Re Urgent Consultation
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 6:58 PM |
To: bernierr@ottawapolice.ca, kiezc@ottawapolice.ca, lucasr@ottawapolice.ca, ferguson@ottawapolice.ca, kays@ottawapolice.ca, rheaumec@ottawapolice.ca, bells@ottawapolice.ca, bourisc@ottawapolice.ca, pattersonm@ottawapolice.ca, brownc@ottawapolice.ca, kennedyk@ottawapolice.ca, drummondr@ottawapolice.ca, dunlopJ@ottawapolice.ca | |
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, chriskiez@solusyion.com, cnardi@postmedia.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca> | |
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 6:01 PM |
To: rob.stewart@ps-sp.gc.ca, "Nathalie.G.Drouin"<Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, marcel.beaudin@opp.ca, jeffery.hutchinson@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Thomas.Carrique@opp.ca, pat.morris@opp.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, jdp@tdslaw.com, joel@joelharden.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "pierre.poilievre"<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, frank.au@ontario.ca, shantona@papechaudhury.com, leonj@bennettjones.com, edann@edlaw.ca, gpoliquin@ovcounsel.com, pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl.gc.ca, Patrick.Brazeau@sen.parl.gc.ca, george.furey@sen.parl.gc.ca, larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, nrodriguez@conwaylitigation.ca, mduckett@dsscrimlaw.com, srp@tdslaw.com, mtsurumi@legalanalysis.ca, tcurry <tcurry@litigate.com>, kris.austin@gnb.ca, rokaku8@gmail.com, patrickking <patrickking@canada-unity.com>, jcarpay@jccf.ca, traversy.n@gmail.com, kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, rick <rick@petersoncapital.ca>, nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca> | |
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Valerie.Phillips@justice.gc.ca, Deborah.Mayo@justice.gc.ca, "Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, cvangeyn@theccf.ca, christopher.rupar@justice.gc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca> | |
From: "Au, Frank (MAG)"<Frank.Au@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:27:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Urgent Consultation
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
I am away on a secondment until Spring 2023, and do not have access to
emails. If you require assistance, please call 416.326.4600 and ask
for the Duty Crown. Thank you.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:27:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Urgent Consultation
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:27:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.
We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
-------------------
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.
En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.
Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Rupar, Christopher"<Christopher.Rupar@justice.gc.
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:27:47 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique - Automatic reply: Re Urgent Consultation
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
I will be out of the office until October 27 2022. If your matter is
urgent, please contact Deborah Mayo at (613) 670-6361
(Deborah.Mayo@justice.gc.ca.) Valerie Phillips
(Valerie.Phillips@justice.gc.
le 27 octobre 2022. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance contactez Deborah
Mayo (613) 670-6361(Deborah.Mayo@justice.
(Valerie.Phillips@justice.gc.
On 10/25/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> "As discussed, for your review and comments. Trying to keep it simple!
> Note that I dropped your last bullet point"
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> LIVE PUBLIC ORDER EMERGENCY COMISSION INQUIRY Day 9 - October 25, 2022
> 1,086 watching now
> Started streaming 7 hours ago
> WARCAMPAIGN
> 52.5K subscribers
> Support the WARCAMPAIGN Help us keep fighting for FREEDOM in the
> political sphere and the culture war! http://BuyVestige.com
>
> Public Order Emergency Commission Documents
> https://
>
> February 14, 2022 Declaration of Public Order Emergency: Explanation
> pursuant to subsection 58(1) of the Emergencies Act
> https://www.publicsafety.gc.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Perspectives (POEC/CEDU)"<Perspectives@poec-cedu.gc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:46:38 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Colleen McKeown I just called Trust
> that Greg DelBigio and a legion of RCMP members should remember me
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Hello / Bonjour,
>
> Merci pour votre message/soumission écrite à la Commission sur l’état
> d’urgence. Ceci pour vous aviser que nous avons bien reçu votre
> message/soumission écrite.
>
> Veuillez noter que nous recevons tous les jours un nombre élevé de
> courriels. Nous répondrons à votre demande ou accuserons réception de
> votre soumission écrite dès que possible; cela peut prendre plusieurs
> jours.
>
> Pour plus d’information sur notre processus de consultation publique,
> veuillez consulter l'adresse suivante :
> https://
>
> https://
> Twitter : @CommissionEDU<https://
> Facebook : Commission sur l’état d’urgence |
> Facebook<https://www.facebook.
>
> ***
> Thank you for your message/submission to the Public Order Emergency
> Commission. This is to advise you that we have received your
> message/submission.
>
> Please note that we receive a high volume of emails every day. We will
> respond to your request or acknowledge receipt of your comment or
> submission as soon as possible; this may take up to several days.
>
> You can find out more about our public submissions process on our
> website at, https://
>
> https://
> Twitter: @POECommission<https://
> Facebook: Public Order Emergency Commission - Home |
> Facebook<https://www.facebook.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Tomkins, Alyssa"<Alyssa.Tomkins@gowlingwlg.com
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 21:41:01 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Kim Ayotte and Alan Honner are
> interesting dudes N'esy Pas Norm Traversy?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Please note that I am in a hearing from October 13-November 25. I will
> be checking email periodically, but I may be slower than usual to
> respond. If your request is urgent, please contact my assistant,
> Jessie Bernard, at jessie.bernard@gowlingwlg.com.
>
> The information in this email is intended only for the named recipient
> and may be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended
> recipient please notify us immediately and do not copy, distribute or
> take action based on this email. If this email is marked 'personal'
> Gowling WLG is not liable in any way for its content. E-mails are
> susceptible to alteration. Gowling WLG shall not be liable for the
> message if altered, changed or falsified.
>
> Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP is a member of Gowling WLG, an international
> law firm which consists of independent and autonomous entities
> providing services around the world. Our structure is explained in
> more detail at www.gowlingwlg.com/legal.
>
> References to 'Gowling WLG' mean one or more members of Gowling WLG
> International Limited and/or any of their affiliated businesses as the
> context requires. Gowling WLG (Canada) LLP has offices in Montréal,
> Ottawa, Toronto, Hamilton, Waterloo Region, Calgary and Vancouver.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jeff Pniowsky <JDP@tdslaw.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 16:55:52 +0000
> Subject: Re: Attn Jeff Pniowsky I was readig about you in CBC today
> perhaps we should talk ASAP?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Cc: "Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com"<Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com>,
> "pierre.poilievre"<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, premier
> <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
> nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
> <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
> <Nathalie.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca
> <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
> "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "fin.minfinance-financemin.
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
> <Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> "Jason.Proctor"<Jason.Proctor@cbc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> "Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
> <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
> <Andrew.LeFrank@cbsa-asfc.gc.
> <Andrew.Baumberg@cas-satj.gc.
> <Ellen.Desmond@crtc.gc.ca>, "Christian.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.
> <Christian.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.
> <Allison.St-Jean@tc.gc.ca>, "media@tc.gc.ca"<media@tc.gc.ca>,
> "hc.media.sc@canada.ca"<hc.media.sc@canada.ca>,
> "mary-liz.power@canada.ca"<mary-liz.power@canada.ca>,
> "media@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca"<media@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca>,
> "Chris.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca"<Chris.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca>
> "christopher.rupar"<christopher.rupar@justice.gc.
>
> David,
>
> Further to our conversation, and to be clear I have not agreed to act
> as your counsel. Please address all such correspondence to your
> counsel/advisors and not to our firm.
>
> Jeff
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 24, 2022, at 9:45 AM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> wrote:
>
> Jacqueline C. Maarse
> Called to the bar: 1990 (ON)
> Grant Thornton LLP
> General Counsel:
> 2000-200 King St. W.
> Toronto, Ontario M5H 3T4
> Phone: 416-369-7013
> Fax: 416-360-4944
> Email: jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com
>
> The pdf files hereto attached forever prove that the RCMP, the US
> Treasury Dept, the latest NB AG Teddy Feming and Jacqueline Maarse
> know that Grant Thornton and KPMG were the auditors of the Brookline
> Savings Bank were I reported the fraud in 2003 Inbox
>
>
> Add star David Amos<motomaniac333@gmail.com> AttachmentSat, Jun 28,
> 2014 at 12:14 AM
> To: "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
> Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com, bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>, Brian Gallant
> <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
> nraynard@grantthornton.ca, "john.logan"<john.logan@gnb.ca>,
> marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
> <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>,
> "mclaughlin.heather"<mclaeptughlin.heather@
> "Wayne.Gallant"<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> benjamin.bertrand@rcmp-grc.gc.
> <roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> <matt.hayes@mcinnescooper.com>
> <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.
> Cc: "brad.anderson"<brad.anderson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> <mnielsen@pgcitizen.ca>, justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>,
> Wayne.Clary@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"
> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, frankffrost <frankffrost@hotmail.com>,
> radical <radical@radicalpress.com>, merv <merv@northwebpress.com>,
> Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, "mark.vespucci"
> <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, "rick.hancox"
> <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "steven.blaney"
> <steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.barry"
> <david.barry@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "Darren.Woroshelo"
> <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.
> <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>
> Bcc: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>, wmjervis <wmjervis@hotmail.com>
>
> Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Maarse, Jacqueline"<Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com>
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:54:05 +0000
> Subject: Your call today with Grant Thornton
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Further to your call with the 2 gentlemen in our Moncton office today,
> we appreciate your interest in Grant Thornton. We ask that you direct
> any correspondence you may wish to send to my attention at the address
> indicated below. We will not be in a position to copy documents from
> your computer and we ask that you do not attend at our offices for
> that purpose. As indicated in the call, communications relating to
> ongoing litigation are dealt with by our General Counsel's Office and
> our partners and staff are not able to engage with you on these
> matters.
>
> Regards,
> Jacqueline Maarse
>
> Jacqueline Maarse | General Counsel
> Grant Thornton LLP
> 12th Floor | 50 Bay Street | Toronto | ON | M5J 2Z8
>
> E Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com<
> http://www.grantthornton.ca/<h
>
> [cid:image001.jpg@01CF909B.
> <http://www.grantthornton.ca/<
> [cid:image002.jpg@01CF909B.
>
>
> Grant Thornton LLP is proud to be
> recognized as one of Canada's best
> workplaces for our sixth consecutive year!
>
> ______________________________
> Disclaimer: This email is intended solely for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use
> of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact
> the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.
>
> http://www.
>
> FREDERICTON - The New Brunswick government has launched a lawsuit
> against an accounting firm in an effort to recover $50 million
> provided as loan guarantees to the Miramichi-based Atcon group of
> companies.
>
> The lawsuit filed with the Court of Queen's Bench in Saint John
> alleges that Grant Thornton was in breach of its duties to the
> province in an inspection of the financial books of the Atcon group of
> companies.
>
> The former Liberal government of then premier Shawn Graham provided
> the loan guarantees to the companies in 2009.
>
> The statement of claim alleges the government approved the loan
> guarantees as a result of financial reports from Grant Thornton.
>
> "But for the Grant Thornton opinions and representations, the province
> would not have sustained a loss in excess of $50 million," the
> document asserts.
>
> It says the accounting firm "failed to exercise the care, diligence,
> and skill of an auditor of reasonable competence and prudence."
>
> None of the allegations contained in the statement of claim have been
> proven in court.
>
> Atcon, based in Miramichi, went bankrupt in April 2010.
>
> Grant Thornton LLP, Grant Thornton International and a chartered
> accountant who works for the company are named as the defendants. They
> have not filed a statement of defence and the accountant named in the
> statement of claim could not be reached for comment.
>
> Norm Raynard, managing partner in New Brunswick for Grant Thornton,
> said in an emailed statement that the company would not offer specific
> comments on the lawsuit because they are still reviewing the court
> documents.
>
> "We will vigorously defend ourselves against this action," he wrote.
>
> "Our initial reaction is that this timing has much to do with the
> political calendar in the province."
>
> The next provincial election is set for Sept. 22.
>
> Attorney General Hugh Flemming said the timing is not political.
>
> "This is not a time schedule which in any way was influenced by the
> government and it is not a political issue," he said Tuesday.
>
> He said the government had no choice but to take the matter to court
> because of the $50 million that was spent.
>
> "The government owes a duty to the people of New Brunswick to do what
> they can to recover this," Flemming said.
>
> © Copyright 2014
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> http://www.
>
> http://www.
>
> 'Strong suspects' but no charges in Highway of Tears cases: RCMP
>
> VANCOUVER - The Mountie overseeing the investigation into the murders
> and disappearances of women and girls along British Columbia's
> so-called Highway of Tears says his officers have a number of "strong
> suspects," but they have yet to uncover enough evidence to lay charges
> nearly two years after the last major break in the case.
>
> Staff-Sgt. Wayne Clary leads project E-PANA, which has spent years
> investigating the deaths and disappearances of 18 women and girls
> along three highways in the province's north.
>
> Roughly 60 officers were assigned to the case at the height of the
> investigation, though Clary said that number has dropped to between 12
> and 15, who spend most of their time on the project. Still, he said
> E-PANA is very much an active investigation.
>
> "It has scaled down, because we've pounded through a lot of work, but
> there's still enough work in front of us to keep going," Clary told
> The Canadian Press.
>
> "There's more than one investigation where we have strong suspects or
> persons of interest, and we're clearly focusing on those. ... I'd like
> nothing more than to sit down with the families and say, 'We've got
> the guy."'
>
> Clary declined to offer details about how many suspects the RCMP have
> identified or in which specific cases, though he said the suspects
> they have in mind are located in Canada.
>
> The last significant development came in September 2012, when
> investigators said they believed a dead American convict named Bobby
> Jack Fowler was responsible for killing as many as three of the women.
>
> The RCMP said investigators had uncovered DNA evidence linking Fowler,
> who died in an Oregon prison in 2006, to Colleen MacMillen, who was
> murdered in 1974. They also said they believed Fowler may have been
> involved in the deaths of Gale Weys and Pamela Darlington, both 19,
> who were killed in the mid-1970s.
>
> Clary said the force doesn't have the same kind of direct evidence
> tying Fowler to Weys and Darlington, but he added: "Personally, I
> think it's him in the other two."
>
> Clary said E-PANA hasn't come up with evidence to suggest any of the
> other women and girls were linked together, meaning there could be 15
> different suspects for the 15 remaining cases.
>
> "If we have a strong suspect, absolutely we're looking for crossed
> lines, but right now we're not seeing that," he said.
>
> E-PANA was launched in 2005 amid growing concern about the number of
> women and girls who vanished or were found dead along highways in the
> province's north. It also came several years after serial killer
> Robert Pickton was arrested in the Vancouver area - a case that Clary
> worked on as part of Project Evenhanded.
>
> The Highway of Tears often refers to a remote stretch of Highway 16
> between Prince Rupert and Prince George, but E-PANA also includes
> cases along the adjacent Highways 97 and 5.
>
> Investigators identified 18 women and girls who were involved in
> hitchhiking or other high-risk behaviour and were last seen within a
> couple of kilometres of those highways. The final list included cases
> between 1969 and 2006.
>
> Investigators once held annual group meetings, but Clary said they now
> contact each family individually, either in person or by telephone.
>
>
>
> http://www.pgfreepress.com/
>
> City bids adieu to RCMP Supt. Eric Stubbs
> Posted On 26 Jun 2014By : Staff ReporterComment: 0Tag: RCMP
> Firepit manager Robert Ryan, left, elders Violet Bozoki and Tom Reece
> and executive director Vanessa West presemted RCMP Supt. Eric Stubbs
> with some gifts before he leaves for a new posting in Ottawa at the
> end of the month. Stubbs and Ryan both spoke of the steps which have
> been taken to bring the First Nations community and the RCMP in Prince
> George closer. The gifts were made by patrons of the Firepit, and Ryan
> told Stubbs, “You’re taking a part of us with you.” Allan WISHART/Free
> Press
> After three years as the top cop in Prince George and a combined 14
> years in Northern BC, Superintendent Eric Stubbs is leaving Prince
> George and province.
>
> Friday June 27, marks the final day Superintendent Stubbs will be in
> charge of the RCMP’s Municipal Detachment in Prince George, a position
> he held since arriving in June 2011. During his time here,
> Superintendent Stubbs has reduced crime in nearly every category,
> created a unit dedicated to combating domestic violence, and was a
> catalyst in the transformation of the Community Policing Section to a
> new model with focuses on youth and enforcement. Of course, he was
> also the detachment commander leading up to, during and following the
> move to the new City of Prince George Municipal Detachment.
>
> “I would like to thank Superintendent Stubbs for his excellent service
> to Prince George and northern B.C.,” said Mayor Shari Green of Prince
> George, in a press release. “Among the many achievements on his watch,
> I’d like to point out his dedication to reducing domestic violence,
> the continued support of the Downtown Enforcement Unit, and his
> essential role in the Mayor’s Task Force on Crime. I wish
> Superintendent Stubbs every success in this next exciting phase of his
> service to Canadians.”
>
> Stubbs will be taking on a new role as National Criminal Operations
> Officer in Ottawa; a role that comes with a promotion to Chief
> Superintendent.
>
> Superintendent Stubbs has provided a tremendous service to the
> citizens of northern BC through his work in four communities over 14
> years said Supt. Lesley Bain, acting officer in charge of the RCMP in
> northern B.C. He has had a significant impact in each community he has
> policed, none more than Prince George. He will be greatly missed and
> we wish him the best in his new role in Ottawa.
>
> Inspector Brad Anderson, the Detachment’s Operations officer, will
> take over command of the detachment until such time that a successor
> is named.
>
> On behalf of the members, staff and volunteers of the Prince George
> RCMP, I want to extend a thank you to Eric for his leadership over the
> past three years said Anderson. It has been a pleasure working for him
> in such a positive environment.
>
>
>
>
> ------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:43:38 -0400
> Subject: Re: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny that I warned
> New Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many times
> beginning in 2004
> To: jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com, pnoble@grantthornton.ca,
> paul.robichaud@gnb.ca, ggilbert@grantthornton.ca,
> nraynard@grantthornton.ca, jdelaney@grantthornton.ca,
> kferguson@grantthornton.ca, blewis@grantthornton.ca,
> krieger@grantthornton.ca, hjaffer@grantthornton.ca,
> rgodbold@grantthornton.ca, pmartin@grantthornton.ca,
> gdent@grantthornton.ca, karrt <karrt@sec.gov>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, oig
> <oig@ftc.gov>, whistleblower <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle
> <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>,
> "dean.buzza"<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, police
> <police@fredericton.ca>, GillesLee <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, "peter.dauphinee"<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>,
> law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>, "rick.hancox"<rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>,
> "marie-claude.blais"<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler"
> <jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>, "luc.labonte"<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>,
> "lucie.dubois"<lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.
> <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
> rhouston <rhouston@burkerobertson.com>, richard.dearden@gowlings.com,
> "allan.cutler"<allan.cutler@
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, ottawairc@state.gov, bginsberg
> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
> Cc: Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> amacbeath@grantthornton.ca, bmatthews@grantthornton.ca,
> derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca
>
> From: "Matthews, Bev"<Beverley.Matthews@ca.gt.com>
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:36:55 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny
> that I warned New Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many
> times beginning in 2004
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> I have stepped down from my position as General Counsel of Grant
> Thornton as of July 31, 2012.
>
> My successor, Jacqueline Maarse, can be reached at
> jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com or at 416 369-7013.
>
> I will respond directly to any e-mails associated with the limited
> matters for which I have responsiblity as Special Counsel to the firm
> or to any e-mails of a personal nature.
>
> Bev Matthews
>
> ______________________________
> Disclaimer: This email is intended solely for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use
> of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is
> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact
> the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:36:40 -0400
> Subject: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny that I warned New
> Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many times beginning in
> 2004
> To: pnoble@grantthornton.ca, paul.robichaud@gnb.ca,
> ggilbert@grantthornton.ca, nraynard@grantthornton.ca,
> jdelaney@grantthornton.ca, kferguson@grantthornton.ca,
> blewis@grantthornton.ca, krieger@grantthornton.ca,
> hjaffer@grantthornton.ca, rgodbold@grantthornton.ca,
> pmartin@grantthornton.ca, gdent@grantthornton.ca, karrt
> <karrt@sec.gov>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, oig <oig@ftc.gov>, whistleblower
> <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, Whistleblower
> <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>, "dean.buzza"<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> police <police@fredericton.ca>, GillesLee <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>,
> andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "peter.dauphinee"
> <peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>, "rick.hancox"
> <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "marie-claude.blais"
> <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler"<jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>,
> "luc.labonte"<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>, "lucie.dubois"
> <lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.
> <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
> rhouston <rhouston@burkerobertson.com>, richard.dearden@gowlings.com,
> "allan.cutler"<allan.cutler@
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, ottawairc@state.gov, bginsberg
> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
> Cc: Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> amacbeath@grantthornton.ca, bmatthews@grantthornton.ca,
> derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca
>
> "Harper, Stephen - M.P."<Harper.S@parl.gc.ca> wrote:
>
> Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the
> Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight
> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:32:54 -0500
> From: "Harper, Stephen - M.P."<Harper.S@parl.gc.ca>
> To: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
>
> Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the
> Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they
> have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply.
>
> *Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response.
>
> If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them
> to:
>
> Stephen Harper, M.P.
> Leader of the Opposition
> House of Commons
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6
>
> maggie.trudel-maggiore@
>
> Mr. Amos,
>
> thank you for your phone message and several email messages. As the
> Director of Values and Ethics in the departments of Foreign Affairs
> Canada and International Trade Canada, my current mandate applies only
> to internal management issues. For example, establishing a code of
> conduct for our employees as well as providing advice to staff on
> conflict of interest and conflict resolution.
>
> As such I don't think I could be in a position to assist you. Please
> remove my name from your distribution list.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Maggie Trudel-Maggiore
> A/Director, Values and Ethics
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> The crook Paul Robichaud spewed Pure Double talking Bullshit today
>
> "Robichaud told reporters on Thursday that suing Grant Thornton, the
> company that audited Atcon’s financial records, could be considered
> but he said the province is unlikely to follow that specific option.
>
> “[A lawsuit] is something that we could consider, but I already said
> in the past it is not an option that we are going to look at this
> point. But we are looking at every option at this point,” Robichaud
> said."
>
> http://www.grantthornton.ca/<h
>
> http://www.nbica.org/english/
>
> The RCMP, Rick Hancox,Bruce Lewis of Fat Fred City and his bosses in
> Upper Canada should at least recall what I explained to them on the
> phone in 2006 before you nasty bastards sent all the cops against me.
> CORRECT???
>
> GO FIGURE
>
> http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
>
> My concerns about the severe lack of INTEGRITY of Grant Thornton and
> KPMG obviously had to do with their fraudulent auditing of the
> Brookline Bancorp etc (Putnam Investments is now owned by Power Corp
> BTW) while many Yankees, the USDOJ and the US Treasury Dept attacked
> my family and I in order to cover up their many wrongs. Meanwhile the
> cops and politicians in my nativeland did everything in ther power to
> assist in the many wrongs for nearly 11 years and counting. N'esy Pas?
>
> http://www.powercorporation.
>
>
>
> http://www.nbsc-cvmnb.ca/nbsc/
>
> 13 December 2012
>
> Canadian Securities Regulators Publish Discussion Paper on Mutual Fund Fees
>
> Toronto – The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) today published
> for comment CSA Discussion Paper 81-407 Mutual Fund Fees, which
> examines the mutual fund fee structure in Canada and identifies
> potential investor protection issues arising from that structure. The
> Discussion Paper sets out various topics for discussion in order to
> evaluate the appropriate structure for Canada.
>
> Canada’s mutual fund fees have been the subject of much debate in
> recent years. Some research studies examining Canada’s mutual fund
> fees, along with international reforms, have prompted greater interest
> in reviewing the issue of mutual fund fees in Canada.
>
> “Mutual funds are a key investment in the portfolios of many
> Canadians,” said Bill Rice, Chair of the CSA and Chair and CEO of the
> Alberta Securities Commission. “It is important that we look at
> Canada’s mutual fund fee structure carefully in determining what
> changes could or should be considered to enhance investor protection
> and foster confidence in our market.”
>
> To date, the CSA has focused its efforts on enhancing the transparency
> of mutual fund fees and commissions through initiatives such as the
> Point of Sale, and Cost Disclosure and Performance Reporting projects.
> While these initiatives remain a priority on behalf of investors, the
> CSA has determined that it is also necessary to consult extensively
> with investors and market participants to explore whether further
> issues remain.
>
> The CSA welcomes feedback on the Discussion Paper, which can be found
> on CSA members’ websites. The comment period is open until April 12,
> 2013. All comments will be considered in the CSA’s decision and next
> steps, and also assist in the development of a roundtable the CSA
> plans to hold with investors and industry participants in 2013.
>
> The CSA, the council of the securities regulators of Canada’s
> provinces and territories, coordinates and harmonizes regulation for
> the Canadian capital markets.
>
> – 30 –
>
> For more information:
> Wendy Connors-Beckett
> New Brunswick Securities Commission
> 506 643-7745
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
> theUS. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing
> in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:59 PM
> Subject: Fw: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: ottawairc@state.gov
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:28 AM
> Subject: Fw: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: doralee.smith@pwgsc.gc.ca ; MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 9:49 AM
> Subject: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: eamacleod@cbrmps.cape-breton.
> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:26 PM
> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms.
> Matthews
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: comartin.j@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.G@parl.gc.ca ; cotler.i@parl.gc.ca ;
> Hawn.L@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.S@parl.gc.ca ;
> scarpinelli@publicintegrity.
> MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca ; Chan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ;
> Batters.D@parl.gc.ca ; Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ;
> Komarnicki.E@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: SECU@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; hollam@parl.gc.ca ;
> arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ;
> McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ;
> gemerson@tor.fasken.com ; garth@garth.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ;
> Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ;
> news957@rci.rogers.com ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ;
> leo@primetimecrime.com ; crilf@ucalgary.ca ;
> giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.
> stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-
> info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; kmearn@mpdmilton.org
> ; Freeman.C@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:52 PM
> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms.
> Matthews
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: chanr0@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:00 PM
> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms.
> Matthews
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: johnforan.mla@nb.aibn.com ; Chris.Baker@gnb.ca ;
> yvon.leblanc3@gnb.ca ; rachel.bard@gnb.ca ; Louise.LEMON@gnb.ca
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:47 PM
> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms.
> Matthews
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: amacbeath@grantthornton.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:09 PM
> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms.
> Matthews
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: bmatthews@grantthornton.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:32 PM
> Subject: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. Matthews
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: freemc@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:00 PM
> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it
> works
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: pmartin@GrantThornton.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:07 PM
> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it
> works
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: nraynard@GrantThornton.ca ; jdelaney@GrantThornton.ca ;
> kferguson@GrantThornton.ca ; blewis@GrantThornton.ca
> Cc: krieger@GrantThornton.ca ; hjaffer@GrantThornton.ca ;
> rgodbold@GrantThornton.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:59 AM
> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it
> works
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: gdent@GrantThornton.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:04 AM
> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it
> works
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: ckennedy@notes.tcs.treas.gov
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:32 PM
> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it
> works
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: Raf.Souccar@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; tim.killam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> martin.blais@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; harrir1@parl.gc.ca ; harrir@parl.gc.ca ;
> peterj@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:44 PM
> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it
> works
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: leo@primetimecrime.com ; gary.bignell@peelpolice.on.ca ;
> crilf@ucalgary.ca
> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 12:17 PM
> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it
> works
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Raymond Amos
> To: angie.coss@cjad.com
> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:03 PM
> Subject: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 15,578
> Domain Name (Unknown)
> IP Address 198.235.184.# (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants)
> ISP Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : Ontario
> City : Toronto
> Lat/Long : 43.6667, -79.4167 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
> .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 800
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am
> Last Page View Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.bing.com/...avid<ht
> amos&FORM=LENIE
> Search Engine bing.com<http://bing.com>
> Search Words david amos
> Visit Entry Page
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Visit Exit Page
> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 25 2011 10:41:25 am
> Visit Number 15,578
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca>; <thedderson@gov.nl.ca>; "pm"
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <premier@gov.nl.ca>; <pnoble@grantthornton.ca>;
> "ggilbert"<ggilbert@grantthornton.ca>; "Minister.Industry"
> <Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca>; <sheila.fraser@oag-bvg.gc.ca>
> Cc: "IgnatM"<IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; "maritime_malaise"
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>; <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:00 PM
> Subject: Tell me another one Mr Rideout after you talk to Brian
> Crawley perhaps you PCs should consider returning my calls EH?
>
>
> Representative of the Leader’s Office
> Mr. Derrick Rideout
> Principal Assistant to the Premier
> Email: derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca
>
> From: Derrick Rideout <derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Don't know why i was sent this.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Auto-reply from csheahan@pa-law.ca"<csheahan@pa-law.ca>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:22:37 -0400
> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Please be advised that I will be away from the office from April 1,
> 2011 to April 11, 2011 (inclusive). If you require immediate
> assistance, please contact Debbie White at 709-634-3136. Thank you,
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Williams, Norm"<nwilliams@grantthornton.ca>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:23:15 -0400
> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: RE Financial oversight the media,
> the SEC, Madoff, Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting Grant Thornton LLP. Norm Williams, CA has
> withdrawn from the firm effective December 31, 2010 and will be
> transitioning his files to other professionals within the firm over
> the next few weeks. If you have immediate needs please contact Bill
> Budgell at bbudgell@GrantThornton.ca or (709) 778-8802 and we will be
> pleased to service your needs.
> This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing
> or other use of this email by persons or entities other
> than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this email in
> error, please contact the sender immediately and
> delete the material from any computer.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:56:23 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: pnoble@grantthornton.ca, ggilbert@grantthornton.ca
> Cc: "Minister.Industry"<Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca>, "sheila. fraser"
> <sheila.fraser@oag-bvg.gc.ca>, ducepg <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>
>
> http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:22:34 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: pcparty@nf.aibn.com, derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca, jbabb@babblaw.ca,
> cynthia_downey@hotmail.com, "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca"
> <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, "David.ALWARD@gnb.ca"<David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>
> Cc: nwilliams@grantthornton.ca, csheahan@pa-law.ca, abugden@pa-law.ca,
> maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.com>
>
> I just called agsin. Heres why
>
> http://www.dunderdale2011.ca/
>
> Just Dave
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 13,631
> Domain Name shawcable.net<http://
> IP Address 24.85.83.# (Shaw Communications)
> ISP Shaw Communications
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : Canada (Facts)
> State/Region : British Columbia
> City : Vancouver
> Lat/Long : 49.25, -123.1333 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Macintosh MacOSX
> Browser Safari 1.3
> Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_5; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1152 x 720
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Apr 12 2011 10:27:57 pm
> Last Page View Apr 12 2011 10:27:57 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
> http://www.google.ca...
> Search Engine google.ca<http://google.ca>
> Search Words babblaw.ca<http://babblaw.ca>
> Visit Entry Page
> http://davidamos.blo...06/04/
> Visit Exit Page
> http://davidamos.blo...06/04/
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-8:00
> Visitor's Time Apr 12 2011 6:27:57 pm
> Visit Number 13,631
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:46:59 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: mark@snellingcenter.org
> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:16:39 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: Harriet.Johnson@state.vt.us, michael.clasen@state.vt.us,
> Harold@haroldalbrechtmp.ca, colleen@snellingcenter.org
> Cc: "PATRICK. MURPHY"<PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov>, "jacques.boucher"
> <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:35:28 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff,
> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: GovernorVT@state.vt.us, jeb.spaulding@state.vt.us
> Cc: cmain2@bloomberg.net
>
> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/
>
> Whats this? A possibly ethical Governor in Vermont? I tried talking to
> his people Heres hoping that he emails me back because his help
> suddenly got busy didn't ask for my number.
>
> "Vermont’s governor, Democrat Peter Shumlin, has said he seeks to use
> an escape clause in the law to create a government- run health system
> that would cover every resident and put private insurers, including
> Cigna Corp. (CI), out of business in that state."
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:15:49 -0300
> Subject: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, Putnam and
> the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc
> To: whistleblower@finra.org, michael_copeland@fortunemail.
> letters@fortune.com, susan.pulliam@wsj.com, Russ.Stanton@latimes.com,
> meredith.goodman@latimes.com, ninkster@navigantconsulting.
> dgolub@sgtlaw.com, firstselectmanffld@town.
> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca
> Cc: oig <oig@sec.gov>, "Dean.Buzza"<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> "Fred. Pretorius"<Fred.Pretorius@gov.yk.ca>, "rick.hancox"
> <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)"Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov
> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, USANYS-MADOFF
> USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov, "Litt, Marc (USANYS)"Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov Cc:
> webo webo@xplornet.com, vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov,
> krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
>
> Thank you for your response.
>
> Wendy Olsen
> Victim Witness Coordinator
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
> To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
>
> Ms Olsen
>
> Thank you for keeping me informed.
>
> Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
> make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
> disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
> of Law within a purported democracy.
>
> As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
> wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
> privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
> protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution.
>
> The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
> aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
> the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
> pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
> was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
> trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
> secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
> people and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
> are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
> beginning over seven years ago..
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 506 756 8687 begin_of_the_skype_
> end_of_the_skype_highlighting
>
> P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
> soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
> night.
>
> http://www.bostonherald.com/
>
> Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
> is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
> timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud, forgery,
> perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal wiretappping
> and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
>
>
> "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
> and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
>
> He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
> Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
> acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
> Putnam insiders.
>
> Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
> is in hot water again.
>
> Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
> private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
> investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
> enter the private sector," Scannell said."
>
>
> --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com wrote:
>
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
> OFFICE SDNY
> To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.
> oig@sec.gov, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
> ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.net
> Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
> mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
> david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
> benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.
> Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
>
> Need I say BULLSHIT?
>
> http://www.bostonherald.com/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
> SDNY
> To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
> ninkster@navigantconsulting.
> Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.
> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:45:07 -0300
> Subject: RE Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, Wikileaks and Daniel Ellsberg
> etc
> To: ellsbergpress@gmail.com, info@armycourtmartialdefense.
> "birgittaj@althingi.is"<birgittaj@althingi.is>, "Julian Assange)"
> <editor@wikileaks.org>, julian@sunshinepress.org,
> julian@wikileaks.org, smari <smari@immi.is>
> Cc: cindy@eff.org, clg_news@legitgov.org, maritime_malaise
> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, Wayne_Boone@carleton.ca
>
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:33:32 -0400
> Subject: Notice that I knew Assange before he got World Famous?
> To: CLG_News <clg_news@legitgov.org>
>
> From: "Julian Assange)"<editor@wikileaks.org>
> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT)
> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>
> More info http://immi.is/<http://immi.is
>
> Julian Assange
> Editor
> WikiLeaks
> http://wikileaks.org/<http://
>
>
>
>
> On 10/7/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>
>> New Brunswick·CBC Investigates
>> How to keep secrets from the public: Don't write anything down
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/
>>
>> Judge slams CRA and Justice Department for 'egregious' conduct in epic
>> Tax Court battle
>>
>>
>> Decision likely to affect dozens of Canadians appealing gross
>> negligence penalties from tax agency
>>
>> Jason Proctor · CBC News · Posted: Oct 07, 2022 4:00 AM PT |
>>
>>
>> A tax Court judge has slammed the Canada Revenue Agency for failing to
>> comply with pre-trial court rules and orders. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)
>>
>> A Tax Court judge has slammed the Canada Revenue Agency and the
>> Justice Department for "egregious" conduct that threatened to deny
>> three taxpayers the right to a fair trial in an epic battle over
>> millions of dollars worth of tax penalties.
>>
>> In a scathing decision that could have widespread implications, Judge
>> Patrick Boyle found the CRA committed an "intentional and deliberate"
>> pattern of ignoring court rules to "frustrate" the right that all
>> Canadians have to get a full picture of an opponent's case before
>> heading to court.
>>
>> The three taxpayers — a Manitoba psychiatrist, an Ontario nurse and a
>> B.C. Air Canada pilot — were appealing three million dollars' worth of
>> gross negligence penalties levelled against them, for rejected returns
>> filed through a pair of disgraced tax consultancy firms.
>>
>> But after years of pre-trial delays resulting from the CRA's repeated
>> failure to comply with his orders, Boyle took the extraordinary
>> measure of allowing the appeals without having a trial on the merits
>> of the case this week, to "protect the integrity of the judicial
>> process."
>>
>> Canada Revenue Agency accused of blaming victims as 'gross
>> negligence' cases drag on
>>
>> "I find the [CRA's] egregious approach to pre-trial discovery in these
>> appeals to prejudice all three appellants who have been denied," Boyle
>> wrote in his ruling.
>>
>> "These abuses of the discovery process ... have caused considerable
>> delay and expense to three Appellants in respect of their appeals.
>> They have also led to an inefficient use of public resources financed
>> by all Canadians."
>> 'With great power comes great responsibility'
>>
>> Boyle's decision is the latest chapter in a saga that has seen
>> hundreds of Canadians slapped with gross negligence penalties after
>> filing returns through DeMara Consulting and Fiscal Arbitrators.
>>
>> The principals of both companies were jailed for tax fraud for
>> promoting schemes Boyle says "resemble in many respects the
>> de-taxation practices of sovereign citizens, though with less of the
>> non-fiscal cultish aspects."
>> Hundreds of Canadians filed appeals in Tax Court after the CRA
>> levelled gross negligence penalties against them in association with
>> returns filed through a pair of disgraced tax consultancies. (Minichka
>> / Shutterstock)
>>
>> According to court records, B.C.-based DeMara's scheme was called "the
>> remedy" and essentially involved claiming personal expenditures and
>> debts as expenses and capital losses for a non-existent business.
>>
>> Canada's Income Tax Act gives CRA the ability to levy penalties
>> against Canadians who make false statements and omissions on their tax
>> returns, either knowingly or under circumstances that amount to gross
>> negligence.
>>
>> The penalties in the DeMara and Fiscal Arbitrators case have reached
>> into the millions, leading to a huge backlog of appeals that have been
>> making their way through tax court since 2013.
>>
>> Tax agency obtains 'jeopardy order' for debt from Downton
>> Abbey-loving billionaire
>>
>> Jeff Pniowsky, the Winnipeg-based lawyer who represented all three
>> plaintiffs, said fighting a decade-long court battle with the threat
>> of financial ruin hanging over their heads has cost his clients "years
>> of happiness."
>>
>> "This was fundamentally a case about justice. Justice for the
>> taxpayers who had to endure years of gamesmanship and chicanery by one
>> of Canada's most powerful institutions: the CRA," Pniowsky told the
>> CBC.
>>
>> Pniowsky, who has four children, said Boyle's ruling reminded him of a
>> line from one of his family's favourite superhero movies: Spiderman.
>>
>> "With great power comes great responsibility," he said.
>>
>> "It's clear from this case that the CRA and the Justice Department
>> have lost sight of that common-sense principle."
>> 'Unprepared, unco-operative or untruthful'
>>
>> Boyle's detailed 53-page ruling goes through the history of the case,
>> and the circumstances that led to each of the orders he found the CRA
>> later ignored.
>>
>> The fight centred on pre-trial discovery, and the rights of the
>> taxpayers to examine a CRA representative or "nominee" who was
>> "knowledgeable" about their case.
>> The CRA has the ability to levy gross negligence penalties against
>> taxpayers who lie on their income tax forms. The penalties have been
>> devastating for some. (Graeme Roy/The Canadian Press)
>>
>> The first person the agency put forward was "unaware of any criminal
>> investigation and had not informed himself" about any involvement of
>> the CRA's criminal investigators in the case.
>>
>> The second nominee was a lead criminal investigator who "did not even
>> inform himself ... whether any investigation was undertaken of any of
>> these three appellants."
>>
>> At one point, Boyle called the investigator "thoroughly unprepared,
>> unco-operative or untruthful."
>>
>> The judge said the CRA and its lawyers twisted the words of an order
>> that boiled down to a demand for the agency to hand over any documents
>> relating to any investigations that touched on the three appellants.
>>
>> "I variously described this as 'outrageously misleading and
>> inappropriate,''this might be contemptuous,' ... 'deeply, deeply
>> disturbed,''highly inappropriate' and 'I don't think you were
>> reasonably mistaken,'" Boyle wrote.
>>
>> It is an ex-reference: B.C. judge removes 'dead parrot' joke from
>> class-action ruling
>>
>> The judge also zeroed in on the CRA's failure to tell the defence that
>> the second page of a three-page "Investigation Abort Report" against
>> one of the plaintiffs had gone missing. The report was handed over in
>> the middle of hundreds of documents. The missing page explained why a
>> criminal investigation was dropped.
>>
>> The CRA claimed it had no "specific obligation" to point out missing
>> pages — a position Boyle found "shocking."
>>
>> "Courts do not consider discovery to be a game, and it is particularly
>> disappointing when the Crown is the offending party," the judge said.
>>
>> He said the omission gave credence to the idea the CRA "is hiding
>> something from them, from the Court and from Canadians about how these
>> investigations have been conducted.
>> 'Stop, or I'll yell stop again!'
>>
>> The judge pointed out that the CRA is "represented by the Department
>> of Justice which is essentially Canada's largest national law firm and
>> employs a large number of tax litigation lawyers who are wholly
>> familiar" with the court's rules.
>>
>> Boyle said making yet another order for compliance would be pointless.
>> The judge compared his battle to get the CRA to comply with his orders
>> to a skit by Monty Python, whose troupe members are seen here from
>> left to right: John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Terry Jones, Graham
>> Chapman, Michael Palin and Eric Idle. (PBS/Python (Monty) Pictures
>> Ltd./The Associated Press)
>>
>> He was reminded of a skit by legendary English comedy troupe Monty
>> Python.
>>
>> "To make such an order would conjure up memories of the Pythonesque
>> skit of the British bobby of another era yelling at a scofflaw: 'Stop!
>> Stop!—Stop, or I'll yell 'stop' again!'" the judge wrote.
>>
>> The three appeals were supposed to be the lead plaintiffs for a much
>> larger group of appeals. The judge said those people will have to
>> speak with their lawyers to determine how the ruling applies to them.
>>
>> Pniowsky says he believes the decision is the first of its kind
>> against the CRA. He predicted fallout both in other DeMara and Fiscal
>> Arbitrators cases and in the wider world of tax litigation.
>>
>> "Intoxicated with a sense of moral righteousness, the government
>> apparently determined or acted like these Canadians were not worthy of
>> basic procedural rights, thereby committing the same wrongs they
>> accused the taxpayers of: gross neglect, wilful blindness and at times
>> deceptive conduct," he said.
>> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> Jason Proctor
>>
>> @proctor_jason
>>
>> Jason Proctor is a reporter in British Columbia for CBC News and has
>> covered the B.C. courts and the justice system extensively.
>>
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>>
>> https://www.tdslaw.com/
>>
>> Jeff Pniowsky
>>
>> Jeff focuses his practice in the areas of tax litigation and dispute
>> resolution in the tax audit and appeals process, tax advisory
>> services, and complex commercial litigation.
>>
>> (204) 934-2586
>> jdp@tdslaw.com
>>
>> Winnipeg
>> (204) 934-0586
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 23:52:35 -0400
>> Subject: Diane.Lebouthillier and her old buddy John Ossowski should
>> remember my email and a couple of their own documents EH Madame
>> Desmond and Christian Lorenz ?
>> To: "Diane.Lebouthillier"<Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.
>> John.Ossowski@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca, megan.maloney@crtc.gc.ca,
>> bell.regulatory@bell.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
>> <sturgeon.nathalie@
>> <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
>> <traversy.n@gmail.com>, jswaisland@landingslaw.com,
>> Andrew.LeFrank@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Ellen.Desmond"
>> <Ellen.Desmond@crtc.gc.ca>, Christian.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.
>> Allison.St-Jean@tc.gc.ca, media@tc.gc.ca, hc.media.sc@canada.ca,
>> mary-liz.power@canada.ca, media@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca,
>> Chris.Lorenz@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca, "christopher.rupar"
>> <christopher.rupar@justice.gc.
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
>> Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:28 AM
>> Subject: RE: I am curious
>>
>> Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is
>> no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the
>> documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the
>> process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it
>> in my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We
>> will then provide you with a reply.
>>
>> Martine Turcotte
>> Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
>> BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
>> 1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
>> Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
>>
>> Tel: (514) 870-4637
>> Fax: (514) 870-4877
>> email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
>>
>> Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
>> Tel: (514) 870-4638
>> email: diane.valade@bell.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> A copy of this letter and all related correspondence will be added to
>> the public record of the proceeding.
>>
>> If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me
>> at (613) 697-4027 or megan.maloney@crtc.gc.ca.
>>
>> In the meantime, the Commission is currently continuing its review of
>> this costs application.
>>
>> Yours Sincerely,
>>
>> originally signed by
>>
>> Megan Maloney
>> Legal Counsel
>>
>> PIAC Welcomes New Board Members
>>
>> Adds Expertise in Telecommunications, Broadcasting and Class Actions
>>
>> OTTAWA – The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), today announced
>> the recent election of four new directors to its Board, all experts in
>> either telecommunications, broadcasting or class actions:
>>
>> Konrad von Finckenstein is a lawyer and consultant based in
>> Ottawa. He was previously Chair of the Canadian Radio-television and
>> Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), an Honourable Justice of the
>> Federal Court of Canada and the Commissioner of Competition at the
>> Competition Bureau of Canada. In addition, he has held senior posts in
>> the Government of Canada in positions related to international trade,
>> telecommunications, competition and electronic commerce. Mr. von
>> Finckenstein has been elected as PIAC’s Chair of the Board.
>> Suzanne Lamarre is a lawyer and engineer with the firm of
>> Therrien, Couture and is a former Commissioner of the CRTC. Maitre
>> Lamarre works in the areas of telecommunications, radiocommunications
>> and broadcasting law as a strategic advisor on regulatory and
>> governmental matters at both the national and international level.
>> Monica Auer is a lawyer and the Executive Director of Canada’s
>> Forum for Research & Policy in Communications (FRPC), a non-partisan
>> organization focused on Canada’s communications system. She previously
>> worked at the CRTC and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC).
>> Ms. Auer has been elected as PIAC’s Vice-Chair.
>> Jonathan Schachter is a Toronto based lawyer with Sotos LLP, with
>> his practice areas including class actions, consumer protection
>> litigation, competition and price fixing, privacy litigation,
>> professional liability litigation, and trademarks and intellectual
>> property litigation and arbitration.
>>
>> “PIAC’s extensive work on behalf of consumers before the CRTC requires
>> the utmost guidance and insight,” said John Lawford, Executive
>> Director and General Counsel of PIAC. “We are therefore thrilled to
>> add to our Board persons with unparalleled experience to guide our
>> communications advocacy, as well as an expert in consumer class
>> actions as this sector becomes more litigious,” he added.
>>
>> PIAC is a federally incorporated not-for-profit and registered charity
>> that advocates for consumer interests, and in particular vulnerable
>> consumer interests, in the provision of important public services.
>> PIAC is known for its representation of consumer, low-income and
>> seniors groups before the CRTC, arguing for better services, more
>> choice and consumer protection for customers of Internet, wireless,
>> telephone and broadcasting services.
>>
>> For more information, please contact:
>>
>> John Lawford
>> Executive Director and General Counsel
>> Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
>> (613) 562-4002 ×25
>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>> Tuesday, 14 February 2017
>>>
>>> RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I just got
>>> off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why does he lie
>>> to me after all this time???
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
>>> called and left a message for you
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>>> ______________________________
>>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
>>> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
>>> electronic signature under applicable law.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Min.Mail / Courrier.Min (CRA/ARC)"<PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000
>>> Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes -
>>> 2017-02631
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. David Raymond Amos
>>> motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes,
>>> and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.
>>>
>>> This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way
>>> the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning,
>>> tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups
>>> that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an
>>> opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main
>>> strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.
>>>
>>> The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system,
>>> and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive
>>> tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the
>>> government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax
>>> evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of
>>> offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate
>>> federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and
>>> $2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.
>>>
>>> More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more
>>> auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams,
>>> increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized
>>> sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations
>>> and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at
>>> promoters of abusive tax schemes.
>>>
>>> On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve
>>> its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to
>>> its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program
>>> recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance
>>> Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international
>>> projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of
>>> the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
>>> Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the
>>> Panama Papers leaks.
>>>
>>> These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to
>>> protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and
>>> technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax
>>> arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To
>>> ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at
>>> promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased
>>> audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal
>>> investigations where warranted, and better communication with
>>> taxpayers.
>>>
>>> To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is
>>> increasing notifications and warnings through its communications
>>> products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants,
>>> and community groups so that they can become informed observers who
>>> can educate their clients.
>>>
>>> The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other
>>> representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax
>>> schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can
>>> lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution,
>>> court fines, and jail time.
>>>
>>> Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal
>>> investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for
>>> tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total,
>>> the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million
>>> and 734 months of jail time.
>>>
>>> When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA
>>> consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate
>>> solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming,
>>> and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts
>>> owed are considered.
>>>
>>> More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance
>>> scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the
>>> CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many
>>> of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The
>>> CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the
>>> Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these
>>> structures.
>>>
>>> To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in
>>> March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG
>>> and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate
>>> Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie
>>> University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in
>>> relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain
>>> the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this
>>> review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA
>>> had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man
>>> file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA
>>> took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was
>>> concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were
>>> appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were
>>> consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The
>>> report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with
>>> the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no
>>> evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA
>>> employees involved in the case.
>>>
>>> Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA
>>> employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts
>>> of interests between their current duties and any subsequent
>>> employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada.
>>> Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in
>>> protecting the CRA’s integrity.
>>>
>>> The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of
>>> misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions
>>> on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in
>>> disciplinary measures up to dismissal.
>>>
>>> All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant
>>> Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding
>>> cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which
>>> coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines
>>> whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures
>>> that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that
>>> compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward
>>> for tips received.
>>>
>>> The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in
>>> place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who
>>> provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion
>>> that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the
>>> OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible
>>> informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on
>>> information the CRA received through the OTIP.
>>>
>>> With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and
>>> internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the
>>> CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income.
>>> For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting
>>> information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of
>>> $10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a
>>> proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that
>>> raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs
>>> totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800
>>> taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with
>>> approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60
>>> audits.
>>>
>>> In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for
>>> tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for
>>> aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works
>>> daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre
>>> (JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The
>>> CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the
>>> working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing
>>> collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong
>>> relationships with the international community, which will help it
>>> refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.
>>>
>>> The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of
>>> success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a
>>> result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts.
>>> Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts
>>> relating to large businesses and multinational companies.
>>>
>>> But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and
>>> investments are underway.
>>>
>>> Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who
>>> choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax
>>> strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians
>>> expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on
>>> this matter at
>>> canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/
>>> statement_from_
>>>
>>> Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have
>>> provided is helpful.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>>
>>> The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
>>> Minister of National Revenue
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Click the following link to unsubscribe or subscribe to TDS
> e-communications:
>
> Unsubscribe at
> https://tdslaw.us3.list-
>
> Subscribe at https://www.tdslaw.com/
>
4936 Comments