Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

N.B. Liberals face $40K penalty stemming from own reforms to encourage women candidates

$
0
0

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

 

 

Replying to   @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks Higgy et al know why the RCMP did not arrest the wannabe Phonelosers who have been harassing my Clan since 2007 on the phone and in emails, CBC, YouTube, blogs and Twitter N'esy Pas?

#cdnpoli#nbpoli

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-liberals-penalty-women-candidates-1.5776239 

 

N.B. Liberals face $40K penalty stemming from own reforms to encourage women candidates

The party ran just 10 women in September's election, down from 19 in 2018

 

Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Oct 26, 2020 6:00 AM AT

 


Former New Brunswick Liberal Premier Brian Gallant promoted the goal of more women in politics, and in 2017 created financial incentives and penalties to encourage parties to make that happen. (CBC News)

A law introduced by the former government of Brian Gallant to financially reward parties who recruit women candidates, and penalize those who don't, has backfired on New Brunswick Liberals.

They stand to lose over $10,000 in public funding next year, and $40,000 over the next four years, after they ran mostly men in September's general election. 

Almost all of that lost money will be paid out to the Green Party instead, which fielded 25 women candidates, two and a half times more than the Liberals did.

Green Party executive director Marco Morency said he is not sure paying parties to run women candidates is good public policy, but Greens will happily accept the gender bonus since that is the law.

"We won't refuse it," said Morency   

"I think there's a ton of other ways that we could encourage more women to participate in politics, and clearly the financial incentive is not on the top of the list. The result is telling us that it didn't work. And I doubt that it will work in the future."

Formula divides up $630K in public funding

The formula dividing up a pot of about $630,000 in annual public funding for New Brunswick political parties is based on votes each received in the most recent election, but was reconfigured by Liberals in 2017 to make votes cast for women count 50 per cent more than votes cast for men.

It was an idea recommended by the New Brunswick Women's Council to the province's Commission on Electoral Reform. Gallant said he believed it would push parties to recruit more women to run for office. 


Former New Brunswick Liberal leader Kevin Vickers recruited mostly men to run in last month's general election. The 10 women who ran for the party were the fewest since 2006. (Submitted by Liberal Party of New Brunswick)

"The proposal by the electoral reform commission will provide a real tangible incentive for parties to nominate more women as candidates," said Gallant.

"There is still much that needs to be done to have more women in positions of influence, but this is a good start to having more women sitting in the legislature."  

But the plan fell flat this year, at least with the Liberal Party, which nominated just 10 women among its 49 candidates.  It's well below the 19 women Liberals put forward in 2018, and the fewest number of women to run for the party since 2006.

In September, Kevin Vickers, the Liberal leader at the time, said the party was unable to find many women able to "drop everything" on short notice and run in the snap election which was called suddenly by Premier Blaine Higgs in August. 

In a statement issued Sunday about the financial penalty Liberals are now facing, Isabelle Thériault, Caraquet MLA and opposition critic for women's equality, said the party accepts the consequences.

"The snap election made candidate recruitment more difficult this year and unfortunately we had fewer female candidates than last time, but that in no way changes our position on the funding formula we put in place in 2017 to incentivize parties to recruit more women," said Thériault in the statement. 

"This reform happened because more needs to be done to increase the number of women involved in politics."

Elections New Brunswick has not formally calculated how the election results will affect what each party will receive from public funds beginning in the next fiscal year, but the formula is straightforward.


The New Brunswick Green Party ran 25 women in last month's provincial election, eight in the Moncton area. (Submitted by Green Party of New Brunswick)

Overall, Liberals received 34.5 per cent of votes among the five parties that are part of the public funding pool, but will qualify for just 32.8 per cent of the money linked to votes because it received so few for women candidates.  

By contrast, Greens are eligible for nearly 17 per cent of the funding pool, despite receiving just over 15 per cent of the vote. That is because over half of its total was made up of high-value ballots cast for women.

Every one per cent of the funding pool is worth about $6,300.

Progressive Conservatives had 17 women run as candidates, up from 14 in 2018. It is the most it has ever fielded.

The PCs and the People's Alliance were less affected by the gender formula. Each qualified for funding within a fraction of one per cent of their overall vote share.  

Although most of the NDP's candidates were women, its vote totals overall were less than two per cent and were only boosted by a few hundred dollars.


Marco Morency is the executive director of the New Brunswick Green Party. (Submitted by Marco Morency)

Morency said he believes recruiting women candidates should be a matter of principle. He said he is uneasy with the idea of political parties having to be rewarded financially for doing something that should require no inducement.

"It's a matter of values for us," he said. "It's never been about the money and I think it would be a wrong reason. Such a profound issue, mixing it with financial incentives, it sends the wrong signals."   

PCs get biggest share

PCs will receive the most from public funds next year, approximately $250,000, based on their share of the vote and nearly 46,000 ballots cast for the women who ran for the party.

Liberals qualify for approximately $207,000, followed by the Green Party ($106,000), the People's Alliance ($56,000) and the NDP ($11,000). 

Direct payment based on vote totals is the most important of four sources of public money offered to New Brunswick political parties to assist in their political operations.

Legislation also grants each party just over $7,000 per year to pay for financial audits required by law and tax credits to attract donors, estimated to be worth $380,000 in 2017.  

In election years, parties are also offered rebates of election campaign expenses in ridings where they are able to attract 15 per cent of the vote or more.  In the 2018 election, that provision resulted in $1.5 million in payments to parties. 

About the Author

Robert Jones

Reporter

Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006. 

 

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

55 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

 

 
David Amos
"We won't refuse it," said Morency
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: Of course not thats the reason he is playing the wicked game
'The formula dividing up a pot of about $630,000 in annual public funding for New Brunswick political parties is based on votes each received in the most recent election"
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Terry Tibbs
How perfectly discriminatory.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: I concur but its nice to see the dudes who made the wicked rule being penalized for ignoring it
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: BTW When I opened my laptop to the same spot that we were was last night when I quit for the evening and saw a lot red markers but my critics were busy
 
 
Johnny Jakobs
Reply to @David Amos: thats dirty Harry doing some editing
 
 
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: I refreshed the page and saw that Mr Tibbs had been rubbed out too
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: You 2 make a nice pair!
 
 
Terry Tibbs
Content disabled 
Reply to @David Amos:
They seem to have a bit of a war going against me at the moment for not drinking their kool-aid.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Me Too
 
 
David Amos
Content disabled  
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: if you were to post what you and I said last night as we quit for the night trust I would publish it within my blog
 
 
David Amos
Content disabled  
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: He and his mindless buddies are just local not so clever wannabe Phonelosers in Fat Fred City who have been shilling for the Keystone Kops and harassing my Clan and many others since 2007 in YouTube, blogs and Twitter etc
 
 
Johnny Jakobs
Reply to @Ray Oliver: and you're still the town joke
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: Not even close. "Your Clan". Thats a good one. Aren't you suppose to be the provider for said "Clan"? LOL...
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: He is. Too bad its not him.
 
 
Johnny Jakobs
Reply to @Ray Oliver: lol... sure bud.
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: lay off the silly smoke
 
 
Johnny Jakobs
Reply to @Ray Oliver: stop drinking the Kool aid Boinger
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: Again. Not him. Not even close.
 
 
 
 
 
 



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
James Risdon
Why not just let the women decide for themselves if they want to run for public office?

This business of infantalizing women and trying to coax them into occupations that they quite frankly do not want to do, whether it is politics or digging ditches or logging or doing steel work on skyscrapers, is absurd.

No-one complains that there are fewer men than women working in the editorial offices of Cosmo or doing nails in salons or working as nurses in hospitals or teachers in elementary schools or handling the public relations of government ministries.

Why are we now using public money to try to force women into making choices that many of them clearly do not want to make?

When did feminism become anti-choice?

Let women do what they want to do.
 
 
Greg Miller
Reply to @James Risdon: Simply put--your idea makes too much sense in a politically correct world!
 
 
James Risdon
Reply to @Greg Miller: Maybe that's why I lost when I ran for the Legislature.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @James Risdon: Yea Right 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gerry Ferguson
The New Brunswick greenies ran 25 women in the last election? How many of them won a seat?
 
 
Joseph Vacher
Reply to @Gerry Ferguson: exacly! maybe they had no plans to win, just wanted that sweet sweet gender $$$
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Joseph Vacher: BINGO
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ray Oliver 
Love This!!
 
 
 
 
 
 
Ben Haroldson 
Spose higgs new that? naw. If you want to make things right, get after the at c on 6, they still haven't paid.    

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Trending Articles