Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all 3459 articles
Browse latest View live

Relatives of N.S. mass shooting victims say their lawyers should be allowed to question gunman's spouse

$
0
0
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:11:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Palango Methinks Madame Hupman asked
some clever questions today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of messages received, this automatic response
informs you that your email has been received and will be reviewed in
a timely manner.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.

**************

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.

**********

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca


---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:10:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
 
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 23:09:23 -0300
Subject: Hey Palango Methinks Madame Hupman asked some clever
questions today N'esy Pas?
To: mobreporter@gmail.com, "Brenda.Lucki"
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, NightTimePodcast
Tuesday, 12 July 2022

Relatives of N.S. mass shooting victims say their lawyers should be
allowed to question gunman's spou
se

 

 

https://globalnews.ca/news/6967657/shooting-domestic-violence/

She witnessed the N.S. mass shooter’s violence. She’s still struggling to be heard

Brenda Forbes, 62, wanted proof.

So the other day, Forbes balanced her iPad on her lap, set it to start recording, and called Glynn Wortman on the Messenger app from her phone.

“Hi,” Wortman can be heard saying. His voice is slightly muffled and the screen is dark, the iPad having slipped and fallen against Forbes’ body while they spoke.

“How’s it going?” she asked back.

 

 

Former neighbour stands by story RCMP did ‘nothing’ on N.S. killer’s spousal abuse

A former neighbour of the man who carried out the 2020 Nova Scotia mass killing stood by her story on Tuesday that RCMP did “nothing” when she reported a violent domestic assault years before the rampage.

Brenda Forbes said, “You bet,” when she was asked at a public inquiry if she still holds that view, despite a differing story from the RCMP investigating officer at the time.

Forbes, a military veteran in her 60s, testified under oath at a public inquiry that she’d told two “young” constables about a violent assault by the killer against his spouse, Lisa Banfield, in the summer of 2013, and that she and her husband had seen weapons at the killer’s home.

Read more: Killer’s violent past explored by inquiry investigating Nova Scotia mass shooting

In previous statements to media after the April 2020 murders of 22 people, Forbes had said the RCMP didn’t follow up after hearing her account when she met them at her workplace in Debert, N.S.

Forbes told the inquiry Tuesday that she’d been told about the assault by the killer’s uncle, Glynn Wortman. She said she’d called Glynn Wortman in front of the officers, put him on speakerphone, and that the uncle refused to speak directly to them because he feared Gabriel Wortman would kill him.

“Nothing was ever done. Nothing. Zip,” she testified on Tuesday.

Retired RCMP constable Troy Maxwell told the public inquiry in an interview that when he spoke to Forbes on July 6, 2013, it was a complaint about the killer “tearing around” the neighbourhood in an unmarked police car. Maxwell hasn’t yet testified under oath.

“When I look back at this instance, and remember everything that I remember, there was no allegation of any kind of domestic. There was no allegation of any other kind of complaint other than him driving around in the old, decommissioned police car,” Maxwell told the inquiry’s interviewers on April 29.

However, his handwritten notes from July 6, 2013, entered as evidence include the name of Glynn Wortman as well as those of Forbes and Gabriel Wortman, with “Lisa” written in brackets in the margin. Questioned by inquiry investigators, Maxwell said he didn’t know who Glynn Wortman was and that he wrote down “Lisa” because Forbes had said that was the name of Gabriel Wortman’s wife.

Glynn Wortman provided police with an account of the assault when he spoke to them in May 2020, saying he and a couple of friends were drinking beer at Wortman’s property, and he left after Wortman made a crude comment about Banfield.

The uncle said he went to check on Banfield a while later, because he knew Wortman was “off the rails,” and as he approached through the woods to Wortman’s property he saw him straddling on top of her, “strangling her, choking the s–t out of her.”

During cross-examination by a lawyer for the federal Justice Department _ which represents the RCMP _ Forbes said that though the killer threatened her after she reported the assault, she didn’t call police again.

“The reason I didn’t report this to the police was … I lost a lot of respect for the police. I didn’t think anything would ever get done,” she testified.

Forbes also testified her first awareness of Wortman’s domestic violence was in the years after they moved to Portapique in 2002, when Banfield came to her door and asked for help after she’d been assaulted by the killer. Forbes said she encouraged her neighbour to seek help but recalled that she was frightened of her partner, who had threatened her family.

“She was definitely afraid he would go after her,” she said, testifying from her home in Alberta.

George Forbes, Brenda’s husband, hasn’t given sworn testimony.

Read more: New report details generations of violence in Nova Scotia gunman’s family

However, he has said in an interview that at one point when the couple were in Wortman’s garage in 2002 or 2003, Wortman opened up “a couple of boxes” containing firearms. He said the weapons “weren’t your normal weapon you’d buy at a gun show,” and they looked like handguns.

The RCMP did not seek a search warrant for weapons at Gabriel Wortman’s residence before the mass shooting, according to evidence presented to the inquiry to date.

Evidence has been presented that in 2010, after Glynn Wortman reported to police that his nephew was threatening to kill his parents in Moncton, N.B., police decided against seeking a search warrant because it had been more than five years since the killer’s father, Paul Wortman, had seen weapons in the residence.

Brenda Forbes testified that after she reported the assault of Lisa Banfield to police, her fear of the killer grew, and she and her husband decided to sell their home, moving first to Truro, then to Halifax and, after encountering the killer in Halifax, to Alberta.

Forbes became emotional as she testified over her regrets at not telling the purchasers of her home, John Zahl and Joanne Thomas, about the danger she believed Gabriel Wortman posed to the community.

“The people that bought it, he killed them and he burnt the house down,” she said.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 12, 2022.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6ri5-fMbzE&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells

 


 

MCC - DAY 47 - BRENDA "BOE" FORBES

482 views
Streamed live 6 hours ago

3.41K subscribers

 

20 Comments

David Amos
Did I hear you say that you have lawyers in your family? If that it is so then it explains to me why you have been playing dumb with me Correct?
 
NS Bluenose
He had alway, from about the third stream stated he comes from family of lawyers. If you have been following along you well know he is far from stupid. He is one smart cookie, watch and learn. He is the only one who will find and get the answers with help from people who want the truth.
5
Highlighted reply
David Amos
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown Federal Court File No.T-1557-15
 
 
 
 
 
David Amos
Methinks Madame Hupman asked some clever questions today N'esy Pas?
 
Big Fun Garage
Je ne comprends pas.
 
David Amos
 @Big Fun Garage  Of that I have no doubt
 
beth lynch
BF appears seriously ill, not credible, and laying the tracks for DV for LB. Sounds to me she was, and still is obsessed with GW and watched everything from her deck. Maybe he rejected her, we'll never know the truth. She spoke on behalf of many people , but had no proof, all hearsay. (Just my opinion)
 
 
 
 
 
Judy Brown
2:50 - 2:51 We'd stash money up there and guns. Heard it mentioned at the time she said it, just wanted to time stamp it.
 
 
 
 
Denise
Brenda obviously has Parkinson or louy body dementia. Doesn't surprise me the rcmp would lie about her report because they didn't follow up. And I've had an ex setting outside my house and it's very intimidating and scary.
 
 
 
 
 
tinycha0s
keeeeeepppo gooooiiinnngggg
 
David Amos
David Amos RCMP YouTube
 
 
 
 
 
Denise
I don't see why you think she wouldn't think he was dangerous and why you are so against her?
 
NS Bluenose
Not against her, she seen nothing. No different then someone saying you did something without seen anything. Go through his old streams of her and he explains what she has to say it. Not what she seen she seen nothing. She is in with the coverup.
 

MCC - DAY 47 - BRENDA "BOE" FORBES

106 watching now
Started streaming 3 hours ago
 
 
 
3.41K subscribers
Nosy Scotian For us all ol MacDonald
Julia Rock She doesn’t remember her interviews.
David Amos The plot thickens
 
Little Grey Cells Illegally running databases .... THANK YOU!
GLenn B wtf lying witnesses
Ash Lunn I'm sure your neighbors thank Boe for running their names in that adatbase too
JJ are we wrapping it up early day
Little Grey Cells VERY RELIABLE.... CSI
Truth InAll Lies down in print forever!
Julia Rock Happy hour now!
Little Grey CellsBRENDA CSI FORBES
 
David Amos https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/07/relatives-of-ns-mass-shooting-victims.html
David Amos Already done 

David Amos​ Why am I the odd man out??? Could it be this old file https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right

Oh Dear
 https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featur....
SadMafioso Tim Bousquet is such a joke at this point.

David Amos ​Methinks anyone can go to 19 minutes for a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vtp75VeOAk

David Amos Yawn
 
 
 
 

Neighbour tried to sell his Portapique home to killer before last April’s shootings

A victim of last April's shootings tried to sell his home in Portapique to the killer before last April’s bloodbath that left 22 people dead.

Aaron Tuck — who was killed in the massacre along with his wife, Jolene Oliver, and their 17-year-old daughter, Emily Tuck  — “wanted to sell his house in Portapique and move back to Cape Breton and wanted $48,000 to $58,000 for it,” according to court documents made public by a judge Friday. 

The information police used to get search warrants in the case indicate one of Aaron Tuck’s friends since he was 13 years old told investigators that the killer  —  whom SaltWire is not naming  — offered Tuck $18,000 for the small dilapidated house with a view of the ocean.  

The friend told police he saw Aaron Tuck “get into an argument” over the lowball offer with the man who would end up killing him. 

“Aaron Tuck had issues with a buddy (of the killer) who was operating his four-wheeler on Aaron’s property and Aaron Tuck ended up getting in a fight with the (killer’s) buddy,” said Tuck’s friend. 

“A day after the fight both (the killer) and his buddy apologized to Aaron Tuck.” 
 
 
 
 

Excerpt: How Lillian Campbell Hyslop became Gabriel Wortman's 17th victim in N.S. killing spree

In his new book, 22 Murders, Paul Palango details the April 2020 killing spree and the many unanswered questions about the RCMP's response

The following is an excerpt from 22 Murders (Random House Canada), investigative journalist Paul Palango’s account of the April 2020 killing spree by Nova Scotia denturist Gabriel Wortman, and the many unanswered questions about the RCMP’s response. This excerpt begins on the morning of April 19, as news began to spread about the previous night’s extreme violence in Portapique, N.S., even as Wortman was able to continue his spree into a second day.


Approaching her sixty-fifth birthday, Lillian Campbell Hyslop and her husband, Michael, were enjoying their retirement in the scenic Wentworth Valley. They had moved there in 2014, after Michael had inherited a property that sat near the corner of highways 4 and 246, known locally as the 4 and the New Annan Road.

It was a good fit genealogically for her, a return to her roots, as it were. Lillian Campbell (no relation to RCMP superintendent Darren Campbell) was raised in the Scottish settlements of Glengarry County in Eastern Ontario, which were founded in 1784 by United Empire Loyalists who fled across the border from New York State. The area had long clung to the Gaelic language, just as Gaelic traditions continued to thrive in northern Nova Scotia and Cape Breton Island. There was even a Gaelic college not terribly far from Lillian’s new home — Colaisde na Gàidhlig, just south of Englishtown, of all places, on Cape Breton.

Between Lillian’s Ontario childhood and Nova Scotia retirement, she and Michael had spent thirty years in Yukon, which was about as far from Nova Scotia as they could reside in Canada. Lillian worked as a nurse at Whitehorse General Hospital and later for the Yukon government in its health services branch. She sang alto in a choir. As Gabrielle Plonka described it in the Whitehorse Daily Star, Lillian and Michael were active in the “mushing community.” They raised sled dogs when they lived in the Grizzly Valley. Michael had once managed the Yukon Quest, a 1,000-mile international sled dog race that runs every February from Fairbanks, Alaska, to Whitehorse. In later years, both he and Lillian volunteered during the race, which could take ten to sixteen days to complete over exceptionally rugged terrain.

“Her nature, her compassion, her gentleness, her spirits were just so good,” Lisa Triggs, an old friend of Lillian’s, told Plonka. “She would walk into a room and literally, Lillian would scan the room and right away from across the room she’ll smile at you and make you feel like you’re the only person in that room. I think her nature is just what made her an exceptional soul. There was nothing violent about her nature; she was always kind. She could deal with any situation.”

After breakfast on the morning of April 19, Lillian put on her safety vest and got ready for her regular morning walk down to Old Station Road — almost 10 kilometres there and back. Neither she nor Michael had any idea about the horror going on all around them. There had been no alerts. Even those who had access to and could decipher the RCMP’s tweets could be forgiven for not recognizing the extreme danger. No one knew where Wortman was.

Shortly after Lillian went out the door, around 9:30 a.m., Michael began to hear from friends about the murders. The RCMP was in the midst of responding to the first 911 calls from Hunter Road, about 13 kilometres to the north. By that time Lillian had already turned the corner and was heading south on the 4.

As Wortman sped along the smooth, recently paved highway, the RCMP was nowhere in sight. Cindy and Carlyle Brown had seen four RCMP cars coming from Oxford or Springhill, but they were well behind Wortman in Cumberland County. He was headed back to Colchester County. Same police force. Different jurisdictions. Under normal circumstances, they aren’t tuned in to the same assistance channel.

The RCMP said it knew from Wortman’s partner that he might be targeting other people. Even though a public warning hadn’t been put out, the RCMP on its own or with the assistance of Halifax Regional Police had evacuated or offered protection to a number of people, including former lawyer and now judge Alain Bégin. With the flood of 911 calls coming in from Hunter Road around 9:15 a.m., the RCMP had to know where Wortman was and that he was continuing to kill.

Wortman drove for about six minutes from Hunter Road and was approaching the New Annan Road intersection. He could likely see Lillian Hyslop turning the corner and walking away from him on the other side of the road. She got a little more than 100 metres down the road, just past the big, green rectangular road sign alerting drivers to turn right for West New Annan and Tatamagouche.

It was around 9:34 a.m. when Wortman either drove across the highway or made a U-turn, stopped near Hyslop, took aim at her head with his laser sight and shot her, killing her instantly. She was his seventeenth victim in about eleven and a half hours. A witness called 911 immediately and said they had “heard a bang” and seen an RCMP car leaving the area.

At 9:43 a.m. the RCMP alerted the Truro Police Service that a woman was lying by the side of the road and may have been hit by a police car. The RCMP cars responding to the call would have been coming from Oxford, Springhill or even Pugwash, a little farther away but still closer than Truro.

Wortman continued on his way south. By now, even he had to be amazed by the lack of police presence. He was driving down a main highway, heading back to the very area where he’d started killing, and there wasn’t a roadblock to be found. A few kilometres down the road he reached Folly Lake and was back in Colchester County. A few minutes after that he crested Folly Mountain and began his downhill descent to near sea level. In the middle distance he could see the sun glistening off his beloved Cobequid Bay. Did he wonder if he would ever witness those glorious tides again? Or did he have a plan to somehow escape with his life?

Soon he was back at the intersection with Plains Road, from which he had come earlier that morning. He didn’t turn, and continued south. About 400 metres down the road on his right was the Hidden Hilltop Family Campground. He had driven about 41 kilometres in twenty-five minutes and had killed Lillian Hyslop along the way. He had so far gone undetected, but now there was a Mountie approaching him from the other direction.

The Mountie passed him and recognized Wortman’s vehicle. The RCMP says the time was 9:47 a.m. The location they provided was not specific. The Mountie radioed his dispatcher and then made a U-turn to go after Wortman, but the killer had disappeared.

Excerpted from 22 Murders by Paul Palango. Copyright © 2022 Paul Palango. Published by Random House Canada, a division of Penguin Random House Canada Limited. Reproduced by arrangement with the Publisher. All rights reserved.

 

 https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/parker-donham-the-hot-mess-that-is-the-inquiry-into-a-murder-spree-and-the-rcmp-response

 

Parker Donham: The hot mess that is the inquiry into a murder spree and the RCMP response

The commission has so far glossed over such key facts that it could malign the integrity of its own conclusion

 
The judicial inquiry into deranged denturist Gabriel Wortman’s murder of 22 Nova Scotians in April 2020 is turning into a hot mess.

In the aftermath of Wortman’s murderous rampage, neither the federal nor provincial governments were keen to establish a full-bore judicial inquiry — especially not one that could subject the RCMP to the searching scrutiny afforded by sworn testimony and aggressive cross-examination.

The feds wanted to avoid a public spectacle that might pressure them to carry out top-to-bottom reform of Canada’s dysfunctional national police force. Then-Premier Stephen McNeil came from a family steeped in police work. His mother was high sheriff of Annapolis County, and five of his siblings serve as police officers. His minister of justice was a retired RCMP officer.

The past two decades have seen a string of disastrous RCMP calamities, including incidents in Spiritwood, Sask.; Biggar, Sask. (Colten Boushie); Mayerthorpe, Alta.; Vancouver International Airport ( Robert Dziekanski); Moncton, N.B.; and Houston, B.C. (Ian Bush). How long before an inquiry gets to the bottom of the force’s dysfunction?

Initially, the two governments announced a quiet “joint review” that would conduct inquiries in private before issuing a public report.

A furious outcry from families of the victims and members of the public forced them to reconsider. In July 2020, the then-federal public safety minister, Bill Blair, announced a public inquiry with power to compel witnesses and permit cross-examination. Michael MacDonald, an affable retired chief justice of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, would head the inquiry. The commission is generously resourced.

A memorial remembering Lillian Hyslop is seen along the road in Wentworth, N.S. on Friday, April 24, 2020.     A memorial remembering Lillian Hyslop is seen along the road in Wentworth, N.S. on Friday, April 24, 2020.Photo by THE CANADIAN PRESS, file

Its website lists staff members including a chief engagement officer, seven commission counsel, a commission counsel director, a community liaison director, an executive director and chief administrative officer, an investigations director, six investigators, a mental health director, a mental health support an outreach and engagement coordinator, two policy advisors, a research and policy director, three senior commission counsel, three senior communications advisors, a senior legal advisor, a senior policy advisor, a senior policy lawyer, and a team lead, investigations. quite the gravy boat. Quite the gravy boat.

Despite its clutch of PR specialists, the commission was unable to tell me how much it cost to send a glossy postcard to every Nova Scotia residence extolling its work. An unsigned response from the commission’s anonymous media email address said I could wait for the Public Accounts to be tabled next year.

Rubbish. The Public Accounts will certainly not have a line item for that mailing.

In recent weeks, a rising tide of criticism has engulfed the commission’s work. Premier Tim Houston complained about repeated delays in getting hearings underway, and the commission’s unresponsive treatment of victims’ family members. A white-shoe Halifax law firm, Patterson Law, took the unusual step of issuing a public rebuke of the commission over its vague and unconventional procedures.

I feel severely let down … I fought so hard for this public inquiry so another husband and father would not have to go through this

lawyers quoting a victim's husband, Nick Beaton

“Our clients continue to watch for signs that the public inquiry will proceed as it should, but feel greatly disappointed that, a week before commencement, there is no assurance that it will be anything other than the review that our clients marched to oppose in the summer of 2020,” wrote lawyers Sandra McCulloch and Robert Pineo. “In the words of (Nick) Beaton (whose wife was murdered), ‘I feel severely let down… I fought so hard for this public inquiry so that another husband and father would not have to go through this. The Commission is supposed to ask the hard questions and identify where things went wrong and how things need to change, but right now I just don’t see that happening.’”

True inquiries understand that the search for the truth, all the truth, is raw and uncomfortable

lawyer Gavin Giles

This week, Gavin Giles, a partner at McInnes Cooper, one of Atlantic Canada’s largest law firms, wrote a blistering letter to the Halifax Chronicle Herald, denouncing the commission’s procedures. “True inquiries focus on the who, what, when, where, why and how,” he wrote. “True inquiries understand intuitively that the search for the truth, all of the truth, is oftentimes raw and uncomfortable. True inquiries seek out information by exposing witnesses to direct and frequently aggressive forms of questioning. We are not seeing any of that in the commission’s work to date.”

At the heart of the problem seems to be the commission’s mandate that its work be “trauma-informed.” That’s a useful concept when it guides police interviews with sexual assault complainants. It’s foolhardy when applied to a factual inquiry into a mass murder covering 22 killings at 16 locations over 13 hours.

Justice MacDonald and his fellow commissioners seem to have taken the requirement to mean they should soft-pedal anything unpleasant — a plan that quickly sent the commission off the rails.

The family of murder victim Heather O’Brien responded with fury when the commission’s summary of evidence elided one particularly unpleasant fact: Data from O’Brien’s Fitbit showed that her heart continued to beat many hours after RCMP Const. Ian Fahie, who attended the aftermath of her shooting, had wrongly concluded that she was dead — and shooed away paramedics because an active shooter incident was underway.

“Const. Fahie is the lower ranking officer in this situation,” wrote Darcey Dobson, O’Brien’s daughter, on Facebook. “He has nothing to gain by lying. More likely he has a lot to lose for telling the truth.”

Commission counsel Roger Burrill explained that he glossed over the Fitbit detail because he thought people might find it “disturbing.”

Imagine that — who would have thought that an honest and competent investigation into the murder of 22 citizens might turn up anything disturbing.

Consistent with this approach, the commission refuses to mention Gabriel Wortman’s name in its documents and its own statements at public hearings. It’s as if his name has magical powers, and by its erasure, everything will be better.

Everything isn’t better. The murder of a loved one is an unspeakable life event for those left behind. Its impact never goes away.

Family members counting on the commission proceedings are not children. The commission should stop infantilizing them.

Correction: The original version of this story incorrectly said that the commission website does not include a staff list.

• Parker Donham is a retired journalist and communications advisor living in Cape Breton.

parker@donham.ca Twitter: @kempthead

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/n-s-mass-shooter-had-a-history-of-intimidation-violent-altercations-1.6517256

N.S. mass shooter had a history of intimidation, violent altercations

Interviews show a pattern of verbal and physical abuse and harassment of friends, patients and employees

The man who killed 22 people in Nova Scotia in April 2020 had a history of violence in the decades before his final rampage, inflicting assaults and harassment on strangers, employees, and patients alike.

New documents released by the Mass Casualty Commission leading the public inquiry examining the killings on April 18 and 19, 2020, show Gabriel Wortman had a pattern of intimidating, beating, stalking and berating anyone who offended him.

In interviews with police after the shootings, dozens of people going as far back as a woman he dated briefly after high school in 1986 describe him in terms including "creepy,""violent,""deranged," and "obsessive." 

Women who worked for him, or were patients at his denture clinic, repeatedly told investigators he made them uncomfortable, and men cited his dangerous temper and extreme rage as intimidating enough to prevent them reporting physical violence.

Denture patients were assaulted, abused

"He f--king scared the hell out of me," one former patient told police.

The man, identified only as BK, lived near the gunman's denture clinic in Dartmouth and ran into him occasionally when putting garbage in their shared dumpster. Wortman offered to fix the man's "scraggly" teeth and agreed to a monthly payment plan.

But when BK couldn't make his $50 payment in December 1999, Wortman confronted him at the dumpster, tackled him to the ground, tore the dentures out of his mouth and shoved a handful of snow into his mouth. 

"He goes, 'Merry Christmas to you.' And he walked away," BK recalled.

BK didn't go back to reclaim his dentures and went out of his way to ensure he didn't cross paths with Wortman again. He moved out of the area within a month.

Former employees told police it wasn't an isolated incident. 

Renée Karsten, a denturist who worked with Wortman at his Dartmouth clinic from about 2001 to 2007, said he would "snap" every once in a while. She described twice seeing him break patients' dentures in half or smash them on the floor because the patients complained about the fit. 

Karsten also told police about the day Wortman stormed out of the clinic — leaving a patient in the chair  — to beat a man who had been sitting on the windowsill of his building, having a smoke. 

"[He] just lost it and just grabbed him," Karsten told RCMP. "Just grabbed him off the windowsill and pulled him away from the window and just beat the shit out of him."

Karsten said she tried to intervene, but Wortman yelled at her to go back inside. She said he soon came back in, washed his hands and returned to the patient in the chair.

Denture board found pattern of inappropriate conduct

Wortman's interactions with patients were the subject of an investigation by the Denturist Licensing Board of Nova Scotia. The board received at least eight complaints about Wortman between 1998 and 2020. Three of those, filed in 2004, were by women who described abusive behaviour by Wortman and in one case, sexually explicit comments during treatment. 

Board registrar Maureen Hope told board chair Robert MacKean in September 2004 that when patients tried to resolve the issue of ill-fitting dentures, Wortman "goes on the defensive and situation goes from bad to worse … from what I have been told by the patients, at this point he is certainly bordering professional misconduct."

Wortman wrote to Hope in October 2004 in response to the complaints, saying the women were "fuelled by bitterness," or out for vengeance.

However, the board launched an investigation into the three complaints and a fourth filed in February 2005. 

Gunman called investigation 'witch hunt'

At one point during that investigation, Wortman contacted a consulting denturist hired by the board, asking him to change his findings on the quality of Wortman's work. After the investigation, he contacted an investigator at her workplace to tell her that the whole thing was a "witch hunt."

In February 2007, Wortman signed a settlement agreement in order to avoid a formal hearing, accepting allegations of professional misconduct and one of interfering with the board's investigation. 

He was suspended for a month and ordered to undergo counselling. Although he completed some counselling, the inquiry documents note he continued to "deny responsibility or wrongdoing when responding to subsequent patient complaints."

The documents show that Wortman wrote to the board to defend himself at least three more times against complaints in 2011, 2016 and 2019, each time saying the patients were either out to get him or had mental health issues.

There was no mention of any other investigations or sanctions from the board against Wortman related to complaints after 2007.

Repeated sexual harassment of multiple women

Although Wortman denied making sexual comments to the patient who filed the complaint in 2004, multiple women described sexual harassment and aggressive advances. 

A woman identified only as BB in the inquiry documents said she worked as a receptionist in Wortman's clinics soon after she finished high school, but quit after less than six months because he repeatedly exposed his penis to her and demanded sexual favours. 

Another woman, identified as SS, applied for a job at the Dartmouth clinic. After an initial interview in 2004, Wortman invited her for a second — at his cottage in Portapique. 

She went, only to have Wortman pressure her to have drinks and stay the night in his bedroom. She refused, but went on to work at his Halifax clinic. She said they were walking through a hospital one day to see a patient when he broke the silence by making a sexual comment to her "out of the blue."

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

"I think that in his head, he thought that he was God's gift to women and that all women should love him," SS told RCMP. 

A dental sales representative who visited Wortman's clinic in 1999 said he invited her to a gathering at his cottage in Lawrencetown. The woman, identified as OO, arrived to find Wortman and another woman — his girlfriend at the time, who he immediately broke up with in front of OO.

When that woman left, OO told police the gunman turned "aggressive," and told OO he "wanted to fool around." She left and Wortman pursued her in his Jeep.

"I sped up and he was speeding up. And he tried to take me off the road. And I was like, what the hell is wrong with you?" she said

OO told police he only stopped when someone yelled at him from the street, and called her "continuously" afterward to apologize.

Others said they wanted to report the gunman's fake police car and odd behaviour — but felt too intimidated to take that step.

Incident at gunman's garage

The summer before the mass shooting, a group partied at the gunman's garage, including a neighbour in Portapique called EE in the transcripts; her daughter, who is dubbed DD; and her friend, II. 

Both younger women later told police the gunman's fully marked RCMP car and uniforms scared them, and had them convinced he was either an officer or hosted parties with "dirty cops." 

The gunman also brushed against II all night, she said, and at one point he grabbed her breast.

Businesspeople who interacted with Wortman said he was confrontational, condescending and would get unreasonably agitated over minor infractions. 

The gunman's replica RCMP cruiser that was used in the N.S. mass shooting was created with a decommissioned 2017 Ford Taurus. (Mass Casualty Commission)

Allison MacDonald, a representative for Yellow Pages, said Wortman locked her out of his office in November 2019 when she arrived to a meeting two minutes late. During a followup meeting, she described him as "contentious," and said he paced around the office "huffing and puffing," and interrupted her to count down the time before his next meeting.

MacDonald said a male colleague who renewed Wortman's account in 2020 described him as "nice as pie."

In March 2020, Wortman contacted local CIBC officials about withdrawing large amounts of cash from his accounts, citing fears that the banks would close amid the pandemic. As bank officials tried to follow the protocols required for such a large withdrawal — $475,000 in total — Wortman grew increasingly agitated and irate. 

After a local branch manager filed an internal complaint about Wortman, CIBC's market vice-president for Nova Scotia and P.E.I. told police that he had a half-hour conversation with Wortman. Dean Branton described the gunman as "pretty upset" and "cursing a lot."

"He wanted his money come hell or high water," Branton told RCMP. "I said OK … then we have to do it in a manner that keeps you safe. Right? And so then that's when he said, he said, 'Well you let me worry about my f--king safety, buddy.'"

Wortman was known to law enforcement

Halifax Regional Police had dozens of pages of records on Wortman owing to the numerous altercations and assaults he was involved in over the years. 

One incident that did result in charges was Wortman's assault of a 15-year-old boy at the Tim Hortons near his Dartmouth clinic. Police records indicate Wortman confronted the teen in October 2001 — though it's not clear why — and a verbal disagreement escalated. The gunman punched the teen in the head and kicked him in the ribs.

The police file notes that Wortman claimed he was acting in self-defence after the teen spit on him. Wortman pleaded guilty to assault in 2002 and received a conditional discharge with probation. He was banned from possessing firearms for the duration of his probation and ordered to attend anger management and counselling. 

This incident, and other Halifax Regional Police incidents where the gunman was accused of assault or uttering threats, weren't immediately available to RCMP in the early hours of the mass shooting because the two police forces used different databases.

The lone exception was just before 1 a.m. AT on April 19, 2020, when a Halifax officer forwarded a file to RCMP on a February 2020 incident where the gunman was upset Halifax police officers had parked in his clinic lot, and locked the cruiser in.

More than eight hours after the rampage began, a Halifax officer emailed a record of the rest of the incidents to RCMP, but later recalled to the commission there "wasn't anything major."

Witnesses who spoke to RCMP after the shootings detailed numerous other fights that weren't ever reported to police. 

One man who did home renovations on Wortman's cottage in Portapique as a teenager in 2005 told police that Wortman was exceedingly meticulous and would turn violent when things weren't carried out to his standards.

"I don't get intimidated by very many people and that's one of the guys that came across to me, like, I got to be careful with him," said Joe Cartwright in his interview with RCMP after the shootings. "I made sure that [my boss] never ever left me alone, cause he was a f--kin', he was a scary man."

Cartwright described seeing Wortman assault a worker who walked on his grass. Wortman "laid the guy out in one hit," and knocked the worker down again when he tried to fight back. As other workers went about their business, Cartwright said the man finally got up and left.

The inquiry will hear from the gunman's former neighbour, Brenda Forbes, this week. Wortman stalked Forbes after she reported him to the RCMP for abusing his common-law spouse, Lisa Banfield.

Banfield is also expected to testify before the inquiry on Friday.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/n-s-mass-shooter-was-treated-like-an-animal-by-his-father-family-says-1.6516528

 

N.S. mass shooter was treated 'like an animal' by his father, family says

Gunman was abused as a child, documents say

New details describe how the gunman who killed 22 people in the Nova Scotia massacre of April 2020 was raised in a home of violence and psychological torment, growing up to continue the pattern set by a father he hated.

The Mass Casualty Commission leading the inquiry into what happened on April 18-19, 2020, when Gabriel Wortman went on a deadly rampage across the province in a mock RCMP car, released new documents Monday on the violence in Wortman's family.

Police interviews with various members of Wortman's family, as well as his common-law spouse Lisa Banfield, describe how the gunman was abused for years by his father, Paul Wortman.

"He never treated him like a little boy. He treated him like an animal," Glynn Wortman, Paul's brother, said in a police interview shortly after the massacre.

Laura Snowdon, commission counsel, said Monday that details of the gunman's upbringing were not intended to create sympathy for him, or "excuse or explain the horrific acts that he went on to commit."

"There are many people who witness or experience violence and abuse as children who do not go on to perpetrate mass casualty events," Snowdon said.

Instead, she said the topic was important when considering the broader causes and context that gave rise to the rampage.

Gabriel grew up as an only child in the Moncton, N.B., area with parents Paul and Evelyn Wortman. He has one sibling, biological brother Jeff Samuelson, who Paul and Evelyn had in 1970 in the U.S. and placed up for adoption at birth. 

Samuelson eventually learned of his birth family and met his parents, and the gunman, in 2010.

According to the foundational document released on Monday, the commission has not yet interviewed members of the Wortman family through its own team, despite attempts to speak to some of them.

History of violence in Wortman family

Inquiry documents said Paul has four brothers: Neil, Glynn, Alan and Chris. The two youngest brothers, Alan and Chris, are retired RCMP members.

In his statement to the RCMP after the mass shooting, Paul said he had been raised in a violent family "[w]here there was more than screaming going on."

Alan Wortman confirmed this in an interview with police, and said their father, Stanley — the gunman's grandfather —was violent toward the three older brothers, but not their mother, himself or Chris.

In a letter to Samuelson after he learned of his birth family, Neil outlined the Wortman family history and how violence went back two generations to the gunman's great-grandfather, George Wortman.

He wrote that George was "a tyrant who brutalized his family," and his children, including Stanley, were "seriously off-centre."

"All of them, to varying extents, treated their wives and children the only way they knew how — like their father treated his family members. Abused children often become [abusive] parents," Neil said.

Paul Wortman's brothers also described several incidents of abuse against his wife Evelyn, and said Gabriel witnessed much of it. One brother said they never reported the abuse because they were all "terrified" of Paul.

Childhood incidents

The gunman's childhood, and Paul himself, were keys to understanding the entire rampage, Glynn told police, adding Gabriel was "warped."

There were various incidents that left a mark on the gunman, Banfield and others said, including one time when Paul drove his son alone down a dirt road and Gabriel was convinced his father was going to kill him.

Another time, Paul gave his son a gun and told him to shoot him.

In his interview with the RCMP, Paul said he "had a hell of a temper" and screamed a lot but "I never hit Gabriel."

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

Samuelson said Paul once told him a story about how when Gabriel was about two and a half, Paul decided that Gabriel didn't need his favourite blanket anymore "so he burnt the [friggin'] thing in front of him."

Banfield and Neil told police that when the gunman was younger than 10, Paul made him kill the family dog.

"What does that do to a kid?" Neil said.

During the rampage in April 2020, the gunman also shot several dogs. 

Banfield has said the gunman told her he didn't feel his mother protected him from the abuse. As a result, Banfield said the gunman "had no respect for women, no respect for his father."

Gunman's violence toward father

The gunman grew up and went to the University of New Brunswick, studying psychology. That's where he met his first wife, and would go on to become a funeral director and later set up a denturist practice in the Halifax area.

On a family trip to Cuba around 2000, the gunman assaulted his father, Paul, who said Gabriel beat him until he was unconscious. 

Banfield, who was also on the trip, said the fight began because Paul was denying how he'd treated the gunman as a child.

After the assault, Paul took Banfield aside and urged her to leave the gunman.

He told her, "I was a bastard to my wife, I was a bastard to my son and Gabriel's gonna do the same thing to you," Banfield recalled to police.

Threats uttered against parents

There was another incident in June 2010 when the gunman phoned Glynn and told him he was going to drive to his parents' house in New Brunswick to kill them. 

Paul spoke to a Halifax Regional Police officer at the time who was investigating the allegation, and said his son had several serious weapons including pistols and long-barrelled guns, without a licence.

But Paul hadn't seen them himself in more than five years, and without more information the officer believed he couldn't get a search warrant.

When talking to police after the mass shooting, Paul said the massacre might have been avoided if "somebody had done a little bit more pushing" around the threats.

Gunman's medical history

According to medical records, the gunman was referred to psychiatrist Dr. Douglas Maynes in 2000.

The gunman saw Maynes four times. For these visits, the term listed under his chart is "narcissistic personality."

He also saw Dr. Cynthia Forbes in Fall River for hypertension in 2009 and reported a "history of alcoholism," although the notes state he planned to stop drinking that coming summer. 

At that time, Forbes suggested the gunman see a psychologist to help him deal with stress "but he wasn't interested at this point."

He didn't return to Forbes until June 2018, and between that time and January 2020 he visited her seven times for treatment of "benign hypertension."

"He had a horrible upbringing from a very dysfunctional family. And, um, never sought help … and … fell through the cracks," his uncle, Chris, said.

Chris also told police he always knew the gunman was capable of killing someone, most likely his parents or Banfield, "but not to this extent."

'This could have been me'

Samuelson said when he connected with his birth family in 2010, the revelation of having a long-lost brother came as a "major bombshell" for Gabriel. 

The gunman had to go through a "horrendous upbringing" alone with no role models, Samuelson said.

Chris agreed with this point, telling police he believes a lot of the animosity between the gunman and his parents stemmed from them keeping his brother a secret.

"This could have been me up there if ah, you know, if I had grew up in an environment like Gabriel did," Samuelson said.

On Monday, the inquiry is also expected to hear from a witness panel on mass shootings and masculinity, and an expert on intimate partner and family violence.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Haley Ryan

Reporter

Haley Ryan is a reporter based in Halifax. Got a story idea? Send an email to haley.ryan@cbc.ca, or reach out on Twitter @hkryan17.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/mass-shooting-inquiry-to-examine-gunman-s-family-violence-domestic-abuse-this-week-1.6516277 


Mass shooting inquiry to examine gunman's family violence, domestic abuse this week

Subject matter ahead will be difficult, says commission

Emily Hill, counsel for the Mass Casualty Commission leading the inquiry, said they are continuing to learn about what happened during the rampage on April 18 and 19, 2020, when 22 people were killed. 

But she said it's now important to "zoom out" and consider the larger context of how and why the mass casualty took place, so that the commission can make meaningful recommendations.

"We will be hearing from experts as well as other witnesses, and sharing hundreds of documents that contain sensitive information like transcripts, complaints and reports about sexual and physical violence, as well as aggressive, controlling and harassing behaviour," Hill told reporters last week. 

"Much of the content will be difficult, and will be impactful for many."

Violence in gunman's family to be discussed first

A main document and various materials on violence in the perpetrator's family will be released Monday, when an expert on intimate partner violence is also expected to testify.

This document will include statements from Wortman's family and his mental health and medical records. 

The inquiry has already heard about how Wortman was physically and psychologically abused as a child by his father Paul Wortman, according to police interviews with his longtime partner Lisa Banfield and other members of the Wortman family.

On Tuesday, a document and various materials about the gunman's violence toward others will be released.

George and Brenda Forbes tried to tell police about Gabriel Wortman's abuse of his partner, and that he had illegal guns in his home, but say police did not investigate. (CBC)

Also testifying Tuesday is Brenda Forbes, a former neighbour of the gunman's in Portapique, N.S., who tried to warn others of Wortman's abuse of Banfield. She has told police and the CBC about how Wortman harassed her after she made a report of the abuse to RCMP, to the point where she and her husband moved away.

Wednesday will see a document and source material released on the gunman's violence toward Banfield, his common-law spouse.

It is expected that the transcripts of the five multi-hour interviews Banfield has done with the commission over the past few months will also be released. An expert on gender-based and intimate-partner violence will also testify.

On April 18, 2020, the rampage started when the gunman attacked Banfield and threw her into his mock RCMP cruiser. She has told police she was able to escape through the partition in the car, and hid in the woods overnight.

Banfield said there'd been at least 10 other physical assaults over the years, and the gunman was controlling about where she went. 

On Thursday, there will be two roundtables on mass casualty incidents in Canada and around the world, and a discussion about psychiatric and psychological tools to prevent these events. 

Banfield will testify in person for the first time before the inquiry on Friday.

Hill said that given the four police interviews and five commission interviews with Banfield, they don't expect they will need more than one day of live testimony.

Commission counsel will be the only ones to question Banfield, an approach that lawyers for many victims' families have already raised concerns about.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/uncle-portpique-gunman-strange-little-guy-1.6381499

 

Uncle says Portapique gunman had history of rage

Warning: Details in this story are distressing and deal with intimate partner violence

The uncle of the gunman responsible for the murders of 22 people in rural Nova Scotia paints a disturbing picture of the man and his family.

Chris Wortman contacted the RCMP in the days immediately following the mass killings on April 18-19, 2020. Two RCMP officers flew to B.C. from Nova Scotia to interview him.

The Mass Casualty Commission investigating the killings released a transcript Friday of that interview, which was conducted on April 28, 2020.

Wortman, who was seven years older than the gunman, said the pair spent a lot of time together growing up.

"Always kind of a strange little guy, never known to have a friend," he said of his nephew, Gabriel Wortman, in an interview with RCMP Sgt. Cory Kilborn.

"He had a difficult upbringing."

Dysfunctional upbringing

Chris Wortman, himself a retired Mountie, recalled an incident involving the gunman as a boy. He said the gunman's father, Paul, loaded a .22 gun, handed it to his son and said, "Shoot" — meaning he wanted the boy to fire at him.

Wortman said police were called for that incident.

During the interview, Wortman said his family was dysfunctional and he moved away at the age of 19.

He described his nephew as a "career criminal."

"I don't know if you have to be caught to be a career criminal, but he was too smart to get caught," he said.

Wortman told police his nephew subsidized the cost of his university studies by smuggling alcohol and tobacco into Canada from the United States, and selling the contraband on the campus of the University of New Brunswick.

He said his nephew was obsessed with acquiring material things, including amassing a large collection of motorcycles, many of which were apparently destroyed when the gunman's warehouse in Portapique, N.S., was set on fire during the massacre.

'Controlling of his partner'

Wortman said he and his wife vacationed with the gunman and his partner, Lisa Banfield, in the Dominican Republic in 2016. He said his "spider sense" told him it was best to avoid his nephew after that because of his role as a police officer.

He said he never saw the gunman in person after that vacation.

Wortman said his nephew was very controlling of Banfield and criticized her appearance, but he said he never saw or heard evidence of domestic violence.

Even so, he suspected the gunman had the ability to harm her.

"In the back of my mind, I thought that if he ever does snap, it's going to be her," he said in his statement.

Wortman told the RCMP he thought his nephew was a sociopath and an untreated alcoholic who was prone to snapping, especially when he'd been drinking.

When he first heard about the killings, Wortman said he thought his nephew was mocking him. The gunman carried out his violence while disguised as a Mountie and drove in a decommissioned police cruiser he'd adapted to look like a real one.

"I'm sure he wasn't, but that's how I felt, you know, to put on a uniform and to get in a police car with all the proper decals on it," said Wortman.

"I just felt like it's just being a kick in the nuts and 'Here, have that' type thing."

Wortman said his first reaction when he saw an image of the gunman next to the mock police car he drove was that the uniform didn't look authentic, but the car could have fooled anyone.

     At one point during his rampage, Wortman exited his vehicle to remove his jacket and put on a high visibility vest. (Facebook)

He confirmed to police that he gave his nephew his Red Serge ceremonial uniform and his high brown boots to include in a display that was mounted on a wall in the gunman's cottage in Portapique — the same cottage that was destroyed in one of the fires the gunman set.

A pair of Mountie boots were recovered from a parking area in a Debert, N.S., industrial park where the gunman spent the early morning hours of April 19 before he resumed his 13-hour rampage.

Wortman said he left most of the pieces of his uniform behind when he retired from the Mounties, but he added the gunman could have stolen some pieces.

He also dismissed the speculation there might have been an accomplice, saying there is no one with the same mindset who would participate in something like this.

"I knew he was always capable of killing somebody or serious harm, but not to this extent," he said. 

"I just didn't think he'd go on a rampage, you know, pulling people over and just shooting. Like, Jesus Christ! Somebody walking on the side of the road."

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/rcmp-officers-impact-mass-shootings-1.5842000 

 

N.S. Mounties facing 'big morale challenges' in year marked by trauma, criticism

Union says RCMP decision not to comment further on mass shooting 'difficult' for front-line officers

The union representing RCMP officers in Nova Scotia says its members are finding it challenging that the force has stopped releasing information about the April mass shooting, especially as they continue to struggle with the personal toll of responding to the killing of 22 people, including their colleague Const. Heidi Stevenson. 

On April 18 and 19, a gunman travelled nearly 200 kilometres through rural communities shooting strangers, neighbours and acquaintances while masquerading as a Mountie.

Families of the victims are now suing the RCMP and have questioned whether the force did enough to stop the killer and warn of the danger. They've also been critical of the amount of information they've received about their loved ones' deaths. CBC News and other media organizations have gone to court to unseal search warrant documents in the case

The last press conference about the attacks was June 4 and in recent months, the RCMP has repeatedly declined interviews about its investigation. In response to media requests, it has sent the same statement reiterating its commitment to accountability, transparency and participating in the public inquiry, which it describes as "the most appropriate and unbiased opportunity" to provide the facts about what happened.

Brian Sauvé, president of the National Police Federation, said he wouldn't second-guess the force's decision to stop releasing information, but acknowledged front-line officers are finding it hard. 

"Our members want closure. Our members want ... to essentially be vindicated in their actions," said Sauvé, whose group represents approximately 1,060 RCMP officers stationed in Nova Scotia.

"I'll say that because from what I've seen, heard, read, those on the ground — and I'm not talking about command decisions, I'm talking about those on the ground who've responded to this incident — acted and worked in an extremely heroic manner with the resources available to them.

"For membership not to hear the RCMP support, that is challenging to them. And to wait for an inquiry to have their day and their say is difficult."

RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell shows a map tracking the gunman's movements during the rampage on April 18 and 19 during an April 24 press conference. Part of the RCMP’s justification for not providing additional comments about the mass shooting has been their ongoing investigation into where the shooter’s guns came from and whether he acted alone. (CBC)

Members not allowed to speak with media

The mass casualty commission has started its work and a final report is expected in November 2022.

Meanwhile, the police investigation — which includes looking at where the shooter obtained his weapons and whether he had help — continues. Two weeks ago, the RCMP announced three people, including the gunman's spouse, her brother and brother-in-law, face a charge related to allegedly providing the gunman with ammunition. The Mounties have not answered questions or provided any information beyond a press release. 

Individuals members of the RCMP are not permitted to speak to the media and could face disciplinary actions by doing so. Several officers declined to speak to CBC about their experiences in recent months, with some citing the possible repercussions. 

Gilles Blinn, who retired from the RCMP in New Brunswick in 2018, said he's frequently in touch with former colleagues in Nova Scotia who are struggling with criticism of their actions during the mass shooting and who are frustrated that they can't defend themselves.

"They're far removed from all the decisions that are made at headquarters in Halifax and headquarters in Ottawa. They have no say in what's going on ... it's like they're gagged," Blinn said. 

"They feel like they're not supported at the top. And any manager knows this, that if your people aren't happy under you, you have bad morale…. I think the morale is very low in Nova Scotia currently due to the fact that no one is speaking out on their behalf." 

Two RCMP officers observe a moment of silence to honour Const. Heidi Stevenson and the other 21 victims of the mass killings at a checkpoint on Portapique Road in Portapique, N.S., on Friday, April 24, 2020. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

Blinn spent 31 years with the RCMP, including eight on the staff organization that preceded the union. For many years, the former staff sergeant originally from Digby County answered media calls. He'd like to see the RCMP provide more information that could clear up questions about how officers responded to one of the country's worst mass killings in modern history. 

"You don't want to hamper your investigation. You don't want to hamper your upcoming coroner's inquest or anything else that's going on. And you have to be very diplomatic into what you're going to say. But there are things that I believe that they could say to satisfy all parties involved," he said.

Blinn's son was one of the officers who responded in Portapique on April 18, though he stressed he couldn't speak to his son's experience and didn't know exactly what happened that night or the following morning. 

During his time as an RCMP staff sergeant, Gilles Blinn conducted media interviews on behalf of the force. He retired in 2018 after 31 years. (Submitted by Gilles Blinn)

But many of the people he knows are also grappling with the horror of what unfolded, Blinn said. Overall, he said Mounties don't feel supported by their leadership or the public. 

"I know of some that turn to liquor. I know of some that were so traumatized that they've retired," he said. 

"The effects don't happen right away, for some members it'll take years.... The trauma of seeing all this death and destruction and the agony of the victims' families, which is what never goes away. You know, seeing their loved ones pick up the pieces after someone's been killed. And trust me, I've been there many times, so you never forget it."

Police block the highway in Debert, N.S., on Sunday, April 19, 2020. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

'I'm seeing burnout'

The RCMP offered employees the option of taking leave in the wake of the shootings. The force said some members took time off but would not disclose how many as it involves private health information.

Some employees are performing modified duties and others are on different types of leave, Cpl. Lisa Croteau said in an email. The RCMP employs about 1,450 people in the province, though not all are members of the union. 

CBC has confirmed some officers remain off work, in part, because they're dealing with the psychological impact of responding.

Sauvé said across the board, members have been hurting alongside their communities in a year that has been particularly challenging for policing. He said COVID-19 has meant fewer officers are being trained to fill vacancies, recruitment remains low, and the union is starting collective bargaining after nearly four years without a raise.

On top of that, protests against policing and police brutality in the U.S. and Canada have prompted widespread criticism of the profession.

The fact that officers have taken time to deal with trauma is positive, the union president said, as it signals an understanding that it's OK to admit to needing help. 

"We don't have to, you know, suck it up and soldier on any longer.... the RCMP, as well as Canadians, are starting to realize that trauma affects everybody differently and recovery from traumatic events can take longer for some than it can for others," said Sauvé.

"They had to respond to the incident. They've had to deal with the aftermath and the investigations of that incident, at the same time grieving the loss of one of their colleagues as well as some of their friends."

Children sign a Canadian flag at an impromptu memorial in front of the RCMP detachment on April 20, 2020, in Enfield, N.S. It was the home detachment of slain RCMP constable Heidi Stevenson, who was one of 22 people killed during Sunday's shooting rampage. (Tim Krochak/Getty Images)

The union said close to 100 officers travelled to Nova Scotia to help investigate the shootings and backfill officers who took time off in the months since the tragedy.

But even still, he said the force is facing "big morale challenges" exacerbated by COVID-19 and staffing stretched to the limit. Sauvé said many officers have been denied vacation time due to operational requirements and have been working "day in and day out."

"I'm seeing burnout. I am worried about it," said Sauvé.

Thirteen Deadly Hours: The Nova Scotia Shooting

2 years ago
Duration 45:10
The Fifth Estate presents a comprehensive inquiry into this year's mass shooting in Nova Scotia, chronicling 13 hours of mayhem that constitute one of Canada's deadliest events. [Correction: In the video, we incorrectly said officers jumped out of a cruiser outside the Onslow fire hall and began firing. In fact, the person who was interviewed said it was not a cruiser and she believed it was a Hyundai. Nova Scotia's Serious Incident Response Team has since found that it was an unmarked police vehicle.]

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Elizabeth McMillan is a journalist with CBC in Halifax. Over the past 13 years, she has reported from the edge of the Arctic Ocean to the Atlantic Coast and loves sharing people's stories. Please send tips and feedback to elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca

 

We have again had an exceptional year taking on 43 new issues between
October 2012 and September 2013 in our quest to promote the
improvement of members’ conditions of employment and work while
maintaining their welfare and dignity. At present we have 90 open
files which we are actively pursuing on behalf of our members.
How successful have we been?

“As an RCMP officer who worked at a large Municipal Detachment, my
worst nightmare happened a few years ago. I was wrongly accused of a
criminal offence. The matter was investigated by an outside police
force. In my opinion the investigation was sub-standard and less than
honest. 

When I contacted the local SRR of “J” Division, then Sgt.Gilles Blinn, 
he immediately initiated moral support knowing the circumstances.

The following three years were the hardest in our lives. Not only
psychologically and emotionally but also financially. The financial
hardship was beyond explanation. The situation was very hard on my
wife, my daughters as well as my extended family not to mention
co-workers, community, friends and myself.

We suffered through a very long and protracted court trial which
totally exonerated me.

Our first action after the trial was to initiate a legal suit against
that police force who did a horrible and malicious investigation
against me. All legal opinions were that it would take years, money
and there would be only discipline to the investigators without
financial reimbursement as I was found clearly not guilty.
I requested a reimbursement of my legal fees at public expense from
the Federal Government which took a few years to respond back only to
deny my request.

Then Legal Fund Representatives from “J” Division, S/Sgt. Gilles Blinn
and the “J” Division Legal Fund Board immediately initiated the
process to have my legal fees covered. This consisted of a review of
my case to the Legal Fund National Executive.

Thinking that it would take several months or years we were very
anxious over the process. However just a few weeks later I received
the news that my request for reimbursement was accepted and I did
receive the cheque for the total amount of my legal fees a short time
later. Now we can begin the healing process after all those years of
what I would describe as a living hell.

As my case clearly shows the RCMP policies/training did not protect me
from criminal prosecution and the jeopardy with respect to having to 
disburse thousands of dollars out of my own pocket to fight a frivolous 
and vexatious prosecution.

On behalf of myself and my family, I wanted to express my sincere
appreciation as well as a heartfelt “thank you” to the Mounted Police
Members’ Legal Fund for relieving our anxiety and financial pressure.
In closing, I want to strongly encourage members to support the Legal
Fund and join immediately if you are not a member. Any one member can
be placed in a position such as I found myself. You never know what
can happen to you!

Sgt. Al Boulianne

Because of privacy concerns and court ordered non-publication of
details we do not publish many of the comments we receive. We however
certainly like it when members show their appreciation and support.

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/mountie-found-not-guilty-of-sexual-exploitation-1.830608

Mountie found not guilty of sexual exploitation

RCMP Cpl. Al Boulianne has been found not guilty on two counts of sexual exploitation while in a position of trust.

Court of Queen's Bench Justice George Rideout handed down the decision on Tuesday afternoon in the Moncton, N.B., courtroom.

The complainant, who was 15 years old at the time of the alleged incidents in 2004, cannot be identified because of a publication ban.

She looked shocked as the verdict was read and looked straight ahead.

At the same time, Boulianne cried and his wife rushed over to embrace him. As the couple left court, Boulianne told reporters that he was happy the ordeal was over.

"It was over two years of hell for my family, myself, my church and everybody so we're so happy now that it's all over. We're happy," he said. "Thank you very much. Now we're gonna have a nice Christmas."

Boulianne, who headed the Codiac detachment's traffic division in the Moncton area, has been suspended with pay since the allegations surfaced in 2007.

Earlier in the trial, Boulianne told the court the girl was the one who made sexual advances and that he had spurned them.

In rendering his decision, Rideout said the two sides offered contradictory stories, and in the end he could not find any evidence to corroborate the complainant's side. The Crown prosecutor has 30 days to decide on whether to appeal the decision.

Boulianne now faces an internal RCMP investigation into his conduct.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

https://www.burchellmacdougall.com/people/linda-hupman

Linda R. Hupman

710 Prince St.
PO Box 1128, Stn. Main
Truro, Nova ScotiaB2N 5H1
Phone: 902-896-7566
 
 

 https://www.lenehanmusgravelaw.ca/jane-lenehan

Jane Lenehan, Partner

101-67 King's Wharf Place
Dartmouth, Nova ScotiaB2Y 0C6
Phone: 902-466-2200
 

 https://bloisnickerson.com/lawyers/thomas-tom-m-macdonald/

Thomas (Tom) M. Macdonald

1645 Granville St., Ste. 1100
PO Box 2147, Stn. Central
Halifax, Nova ScotiaB3J 3B7
Phone: 902-425-6000



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 11:47:00 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Does Allan Caroll or anyone else recall what went down
between the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers and I in 2018???
To: tmacdonald@bloisnickerson.com, jane@lenehanmusgravelaw.ca,
lhupman@burchellmacdougall.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 13:49:43 +0000
Subject: RE: Does Allan Caroll or anyone else recall what went down
between the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers and I in 2018???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.


Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-

Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca%20> /
premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premierministre@gnb.ca>


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 10:46:11 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Does Allan Caroll or anyone else recall what went down
between the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers and I in 2018???
To: nighttimepodcast@gmail.com, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
"blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 05:41:45 -0300
Subject: Does Allan Caroll or anyone else recall what went down
between the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers and I in 2018???
To: adam@adamrodgers.ca, lori.ward@justice.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, tim
<tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zoufCkji9SU&ab_channel=AdamRodgers


 

MCC Day 27 – Participants’ Boycott Continues, and Local District
Commander Testifies (by Video)
401 views
May 26, 2022
Adam Rodgers
549 subscribers
The Mass Casualty Proceedings continued today from Truro, with
testimony from Staff Sgt. Al Carroll, who was the District Commander
for Colchester County at the time of the shootings. Outside of the
facility where the proceedings were taking place, family members and
supporters were protesting the Commission’s decision-making on witness
accommodation requests for RCMP supervisors. This was day two of the
boycott of proceedings by many of the family participants. Some were
protesting outside of the proceedings venue, calling for changes to
the Commission procedures to allow more fulsome participation (and
specifically cross-examination) by participants and their lawyers.
Staff Sgt. Carroll, along with two other staff sergeants (none of whom
had direct experience with violence or exposure to scenes of violence
during the events of the mass casualty) have been given permission to
testify by video, with limits on cross-examination. Those protesting
are justified in their criticisms of the Commission’s approach.
Today’s testimony was a good demonstration of why the accommodation
requests need not have been granted. Staff Sgt. Carroll testified for
3 ½ hours in the morning, then another hour in the afternoon, with no
unscheduled breaks being requested by him, and he displayed no obvious
signs of discomfort, nor certainly trauma. He displayed little emotion
of any kind, or much energy, in his answers. The National Police
Federation has requested accommodations previously for lower ranking
officers. These had been rejected, and the officers thereafter also
testified with no obvious signs of discomfort or trauma. All of this
serves to undermine the credibility of both the NPF and the
Commission.


  8  Comments


David Amos

Go Figure


> ---------- Original message ----------
 > From: Allan Carroll <allan.carrollatrcmp-grcdorgcdotca>
 > Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:14:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: Trust that Murray Segal's appointment to whitewash the
> Rehteah Parsons matter did not surprise me after the meail I sent this
> weekend (AOL)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333atgmaildotcom>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Fraser, Sean - M.P."<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 20:12:43 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fwd Does anyone recall what went down
between the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers and I in 2018???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your message. This is an automated reply.
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<https://www.facebook.com/SeanFraserMP/photos/a.1628138987467042.1073741829.1627521694195438/2066666113614325/?type=3&theater>
Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter.com/SeanFraserMP>
Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www.instagram.com/seanfrasermp/?hl=en>
www.seanfrasermp.ca<file:///C:/Users/Savannah%20DeWolfe/Downloads/www.seanfrasermp.ca>
Toll free: 1-844-641-5886
Please be advised that this account is for matters related to Central
Nova. If you live outside of Central Nova and your issue pertains to
immigration, please contact Minister@cic.gc.ca
I am currently receiving an extremely high number of emails.
If you are inquiring about Canada’s commitment to welcome vulnerable
Afghan refugees, you can find more information on Canada’s response to
the situation in Afghanistan
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan.html>.
The Government of Canada remains firm in its commitment to welcome
Afghan refugees to Canada, and will be working to increase the number
of eligible refugees to 40,000. This will be done through 2 programs:
1.      A special immigration program for Afghan nationals, and their
families, who assisted the Government of Canada.
You don’t need to currently be in Afghanistan or return to Afghanistan
to be eligible or to have your application processed once you’re able
to apply.
 Find out more about this special immigration
program<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures/immigration-program.html>
2.      A special humanitarian program focused on resettling Afghan
nationals who
·   are outside of Afghanistan
·   don’t have a durable solution in a third country
·   are part of one of the following groups:
·  women leaders
·  human rights
advocates<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures.html#human-rights>
·  persecuted religious or ethnic minorities
·  LGBTI individuals
·  journalists and people who helped Canadian journalists
How to reach us
Contact us using our web
form<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/en/>.Please
don’t send photos or other attachments until we ask you to.
By phone at +1-613-321-4243
·        Available both inside Canada and abroad
·        Monday to Friday, 6:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. (ET)
·        Saturday and Sunday, 6:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. (ET)
·        We’ll accept charges for collect calls or calls with reverse charges
If you or a loved one are a Canadian citizen or PR currently in
Afghanistan, contact Global Affairs Canada’s 24/7 Emergency Watch and
Response Centre ASAP by phone (+1-613-996-8885), email
(sos@international.gc.ca<mailto:sos@international.gc.ca>) or text
(+1-613-686-3658).
If you would like to immigrate to Canada, please click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/come-canada-tool.html>
to learn more.
To inquire about the status of an immigration case,click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application/check-status.html>.
You can also contact your local Member of Parliament for further
assistance. If you don’t know who your Member of Parliament is, you
can find out here, https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
If you have been the victim of fraud or want to report fraudulent
activity, please call the Canada Border Services Agency’s fraud
hotline at 1-888-502-9060.
For other general questions about Canadian immigration, click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/services/immigration-citizenship.html>.
Thank you.
/////
Veuillez noter que je reçois actuellement un nombre extrêmement élevé
de courriels.
Si vous vous renseignez sur l'engagement du Canada à accueillir les
réfugiés afghans vulnérables, vous pouvez trouver plus d'information
sur la réponse du Canada à la situation en Afghanistan
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan.html>.
Le gouvernement du Canada reste ferme dans son engagement à accueillir
des réfugiés afghans au Canada, et s'efforcera d'augmenter le nombre
de réfugiés admissibles à 40 000. Cela se fera par le biais de deux
programmes :
Un programme d'immigration spécial pour les ressortissants afghans, et
leurs familles, qui ont aidé le gouvernement du Canada.
Vous n'avez pas besoin d'être actuellement en Afghanistan ou d'y
retourner pour être admissible ou pour que votre demande soit traitée,
une fois que vous serez en mesure de présenter une demande.
               Pour en savoir plus sur ce programme d'immigration
spécial<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales/programme-immigration.html>
2.     Un programme humanitaire spécial axé sur la réinstallation des
ressortissants afghans qui
·            se trouvent à l'extérieur de l'Afghanistan
·            n’ont pas de solution durable dans un pays tiers
·            font partie de l'un des groupes suivants :
·            femmes leaders,
·            défenseurs des droits de la
personne<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales.html>,
·            minorités religieuses ou ethniques persécutées,
·            personnes LGBTI,
·            journalistes et personnes ayant aidé des journalistes canadiens.
Comment nous joindre
Veuillez communiquer avec nous en utilisant notre formulaire
Web<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/fr/>.
Veuillez ne pas envoyer de photos ou d'autres pièces jointes jusqu'à
ce que nous vous le demandions.
Par téléphone au +1-613-321-4243.
·            Disponible au Canada et à l’étranger.
·            Du lundi au vendredi, de 6 h 30 à 19 h (HE).
·            Samedi et dimanche, de 6 h 30 à 15 h 30 (HE).
·            Nous acceptons les frais pour les appels à frais virés ou
les appels avec inversion des frais.
Si vous ou un de vos proches êtes un citoyen canadien ou un RP
actuellement en Afghanistan, communiquez dès que possible avec le
Centre de veille et d'intervention d'urgence 24/7 d'Affaires mondiales
Canada par téléphone (+1-613-996-8885), par courriel
(sos@international.gc.ca) ou par texto (+1-613-686-3658).
Si vous souhaitez immigrer au Canada, veuillez cliquer
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/immigrer-canada.html>
pour en savoir plus.
Pour vous renseigner sur l'état d'un dossier d'immigration, cliquez
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/demande/verifier-etat.html>.
Vous pouvez également contacter votre député local pour obtenir une
assistance supplémentaire. Si vous ne savez pas qui est votre député,
vous pouvez le découvrir ici, https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr.
Si vous avez été victime d'une fraude ou si vous voulez signaler une
activité frauduleuse, veuillez appeler la ligne d'assistance
téléphonique de l'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada au
1-888-502-9060.
Pour d'autres questions générales sur l'immigration canadienne,
cliquez ici<canada.ca/immigration>.
Merci.




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 17:10:51 -0300
Subject: Fwd Does anyone recall what went down between the lawyers
Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers and I in 2018???
To: bgrimes@lsnl.ca, jherman@flsc.ca, johnh@cba.org, john@iilace.org,
secretary@lsz.co.zw, fwilson@flsc.ca, luke.rheinberger@lst.org.au,
rsteinmann@lawsocietynamibia.org,
marie-christine.fiset@greenpeace.org, pmo@danskeadvokater.dk,
hc@hklawsoc.org.hk, marie-claude.bibeau@parl.gc.ca,
Premier@ontario.ca, "Candice.Bergen"<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>,
editor@pictouadvocate.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"
<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, shane.moffatt@greenpeace.org, "Sean.Fraser"
<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, Pamela.Murray@greenpeace.org,
davidmckiec@gmail.com, fvjones@gmail.com, info@nsbs.org

https://iilace.org/executive/

https://flsc.ca/about-us/management-team-and-professional-staff/

https://www.pictouadvocate.com/community/suspended-lawyer-keeping-public-up-to-date-on-mass-casualty-proceedings/article_06b4d062-cc75-11ec-b031-7f5e794bbb75.html


Suspended lawyer keeping public up-to-date on Mass Casualty proceedings
Janet Whitman For the Advocate
May 5, 2022

With a year hiatus from his law practice, Adam Rodgers is taking the
time to try and help Nova Scotians hold the commission investigating
April 2020’s mass shooting rampage accountable.

Contact Us
21 George Street
Pictou, Nova Scotia
B0K 1H0

Main line: 902-485-8014

Raissa Tetanish  | editor@pictouadvocate.com

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/desmond-inquiry-s2-d17-1.5960150

Desmond inquiry lawyer Adam Rodgers given one-year suspension for
professional misconduct

Rodgers has asked that the suspension be delayed until the fatality
inquiry has ended
Laura Fraser · CBC News · Posted: Mar 23, 2021 9:40 AM AT


https://www.nationalobserver.com/2021/03/12/opinion/palm-oil-canadian-dairy-federal-action


Getting dirty palm oil out of Canadian dairy requires federal action
By Shane Moffatt | Opinion | March 12th 2021


Think global, act local

We clearly need a new vision for the food we consume — one that
prioritizes resilience, accessibility, transparency and ecology. We
have the right to know where our food comes from, who produced it and
how it affects the planet. Agriculture Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau
has a mandate that talks about fighting climate change, stopping
biodiversity loss and building resilience, but there is clearly some
internal resistance to change.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Tilly Pillay <tpillay@nsbs.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:57:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: After reading the news this weekend about
Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers
a favour told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I am out of the office on vacation until November 8. If your matter is
urgent, please contact my assistant, Anne Broughm, at
abroughm@nsbs.org or 902 422 1491. Thank you.

Tilly



---------- Original message ----------
From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:57:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: After reading the news this weekend about
Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers
a favour told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If
your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please
forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or
burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored.

The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of
services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has
become vacant.  The party Whip supervises the staff retained under
these circumstances.

Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of
Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will
continue to provide services to constituents.

You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at
(604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway,
Burnaby BC.

Office Hours:

Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm
Friday 10am - 12pm



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 16:57:51 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: After reading the news this weekend about
Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers
a favour told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.




---------- Original message ----------
From: Birgitta Jonsdottir <birgitta@this.is>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 09:11:44 -0800
Subject: e-mail overload Re: Fwd: After reading the news this weekend
about Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam
Rodgers a favour told their assistants I would be publishing these
emails etc
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com


Thank you for writing to me. I get so many emails that it is
impossible for me to even read them all. If you have an urgent matter
to discuss. Please put Priority in the subject. Please refrain from
sending email to multitude of email addresses you might have for me.
Only send one email with priority in the subject. It means I will read
it and will do my very best to reply asap :)





---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 12:57:43 -0400
Subject: After reading the news this weekend about Nova Scotia
LIEbranos I did the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers a favour
told their assistants I would be publishing these emails etc
To: "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"
<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan
(LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
"Alex.Johnston"<Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
"Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1"<Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"pierre.poilievre.a1"<pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
pierre.paul-hus@parl.gc.ca,
ps.publicsafetymcu-securitepubliqueucm.sp@canada.ca, "ralph.goodale"
<ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
"clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
<david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Dale.Morgan"<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.eidt"
<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
"brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg"
<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>, "Norman.Sabourin"
<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>, "Gib.vanErt"<Gib.vanErt@scc-csc.ca>,
"marc.giroux"<marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
english@rcinet.ca, "kennedy.stewart"<kennedy.stewart@parl.gc.ca>,
pvanloan@airdberlis.com, nicola.diiorio@bcf.ca, "Nicola.DiIorio"
<Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
"sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Sophia.Harris"
<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, "David.Raymond.Amos"
<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
"len.hoyt"<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "david.young"
<david.young@mcinnescooper.com>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, "David.Akin"
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
news919 <news919@rogers.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
<news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips
<newstips@cnn.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, tpillay@nsbs.org,
Adam@boudrotrodgers.com, "lyle.howe"<lyle.howe@eastlink.ca>,
jason@boudrotrodgers.com

Monday, 5 November 2018

After reading the news this weekend about Nova Scotia LIEbranos I did
the lawyers Tilly Pillay and Adam Rodgers a favour told their
assistants I would be publishing these emails etc

Tilly Pillay is not in her office this week and things went as far as
they always do whenever I call or email her very questionable Law
Society Here hoping Adam Rodgers finally acts with some semblance of
Integrity. However after all this time I am not betting on it.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400
Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and
the NDP to ignore me as well???
To: Liberal / Assistance <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc?

On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> wrote:
> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the event that
> you were inclined to do so.)
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Munroe
> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
> To: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>; bdysart
> <bdysart@smss.com>; bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>;
> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com;
> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; assistance@liberal.ca; Karine
> Fortin <info@ndp.ca>; stephen.harper <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Trust
> that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore I am before
> the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>
> On 1/6/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>> BCC line
>>
>> Dr. John Gillis
>> P.O. Box 723
>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>> Canada B3J 2T3
>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>
>> John Allan, President
>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>> T: (709) 685-1230
>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>
>>
>> Braeden Caley
>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>>  604-809-9951
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>
>>
>> Britt Dysart QC
>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>> 77 Westmorland Street
>> P.O. Box 730
>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>> E3B 5B4
>>
>> P 506.443.0153
>> F 506.443.9948
>>
>>
>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>
>>
>> Ewan W. Clark
>> Montague
>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>
>> Robert M. Schuett
>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com
>>
>>
>> http://www.liberal.ca/national-board-of-directors/
>>
>> Who are we?
>>
>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>> Anna Gainey
>>
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>
>> T @annamgainey
>> Leader        Justin Trudeau
>> National President    Anna Gainey
>> Acting National Director      Christina Topp
>> National Vice-President (English)     Chris MacInnes
>> National Vice-President (French)      Marie Tremblay
>> National Policy Chair         Maryanne Kampouris
>> National Membership Secretary         Leanne Bourassa
>> Past National President       Mike Crawley
>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador   John Allan
>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island      Ewan Clark
>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party  John Gillis
>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association  Britt Dysart
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec)   Linda Julien
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario)  Tyler Banham
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba)         Sachit Mehra
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)     Evatt Merchant
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta)  Robbie Schuett
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)         Braeden
>> Caley
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon       Blake Rogers
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories)    Rosanna
>> Nicol
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut     Michel Potvin
>> Caucus Representative         Francis Scarpaleggia
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female)     Caitlin Tolley
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male)       Kevin Seesequasis
>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission        Carlene Variyan
>> President, Young Liberals of Canada   Justin Kaiser
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French)        Anne Adams
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English)       Kenneth D. Halliday
>> Chair, Council of Presidents  Veena Bhullar
>> Chief Financial Officer       Chuck Rifici
>> Chief Revenue Officer         Stephen Bronfman
>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada         Mike Eizenga
>> National Campaign Co-Chair    Katie Telford
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English)    Craig Munroe
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French)     Elise Bartlett
>>
>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>> CORRECT G$?
>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>> <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
>> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
>> "Marianne.Ryan"<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, sunrayzulu
>> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
>> "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
>> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, radical
>> <radical@radicalpress.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
>> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
>> andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.
>> html
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>> 81.  The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC.  The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82.  The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-
>> launch.html
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-w
>> ikileaks.html
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>
>>
>> 84.  The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were
>> recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP
>> knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the
>> Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact
>> that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the
>> Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the
>> statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist
>> Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that
>> Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the
>> American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against
>> the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th
>> Parliament.
>>
>> 85.  The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited
>> Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of
>> Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in
>> person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening
>> to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny
>> that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters
>> admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him.
>>
>> On 12/21/15, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Rabson, Mia"<Mia.Rabson@freepress.mb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:45:36 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Monday, January 4.
>>> If you need immediate assistance please contact our city desk at 613
>>> 697 7292 or fpcity@freepress.mb.ca.
>>> Happy Holidays!
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson
>>> Parliamentary Bureau Chief
>>> Winnipeg Free Press
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Sarra R. Deane"<s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 20:10:12 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until Thursday, Nov. 12th.  I will
>>> respond to emails upon my return. Miigwech and all the best.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:45:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca, Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca,
>>> "carolyn.bennett"<carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/peacemaker-363019331.html
>>>
>>> Peacemaker
>>> Group pushes for Truth and Reconciliation chairman to get Nobel Prize
>>>
>>> By: Mia Rabson
>>> Posted: 12/19/2015 3:00 AM   | Last Modified: 12/19/2015 6:12 AM
>>>
>>> " Murray Sinclair already has an impressive resumé.
>>>
>>> He's the first aboriginal judge appointed to the bench in Manitoba,
>>> co-commissioner of the Aboriginal Justice Inquiry and chairman of the
>>> Truth and Reconciliation Commission.
>>>
>>> But if a group of Canadians has its way, he will get one of the
>>> highest honours in the world to add to the list: Nobel Peace Prize
>>> recipient.
>>>
>>> "He and Phil Fontaine should share a Nobel Peace Prize," said Wab
>>> Kinew, associate vice-president for indigenous relations at the
>>> University of Winnipeg.
>>>
>>> Kinew said a group of people in Winnipeg, Toronto and Ottawa are
>>> collaborating to nominate the two men, who they believe are jointly
>>> responsible for giving back hope to Canada's indigenous people that
>>> hasn't existed in a long time.
>>>
>>> "They made it into something that is peace-building and
>>> nation-building," Kinew said. "It has really transformed our country."
>>>
>>> Mia Rabson, Ottawa Bureau Chief
>>> 613-369–4824
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>  Samyn, Editor
>>> 204–697–7295
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:05:01 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Wab Kinew
>>> To: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"
>>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
>>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/21/why-do-canadians-need
>>> -to-know-anything-about-injuns/
>>>
>>> http://www.uwinnipeg.ca/about/administration/avp-igca.htmlAssociate
>>> Vice-President, Indigenous Affairs
>>>
>>> Wab Kinew
>>> phone: 204.789.9931
>>> email: w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca
>>> Biography/Publications
>>>
>>> Executive Assistant
>>>
>>> Sarra Deane
>>> phone: 204.988.7121
>>> email: s.deane@uwinnipeg.ca
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --- Confidentiality Warning: This message and any attachments are
> confidential and subject to copyright. They are intended only for the use of
> the intended recipient(s) and may be privileged. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
> conversion to hard copy, copying, circulation or other use of this message
> and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete
> this message and any attachments from your system.
>
> --- Avis de confidentialité : Ce message et toute pièce jointe sont
> confidentiels et assujettis au droit d’auteur. Il est de l’usage exclusif du
> ou des destinataire(s) visé(s) et peuvent être confidentiels. Si vous n’êtes
> pas le(s) destinataire(s) visé(s), nous attirons votre attention sur le fait
> qu’il est strictement interdit d’utiliser cette information, de la
> transmettre, de l’imprimer sur papier, de la copier, de la distribuer ou de
> la diffuser. Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire visé, veuillez en aviser
> immédiatement l’expéditeur par courriel électronique et détruire ce message
> et toute copie de celui-ci.
>
> --------------------------------
> This email is a service from Liberal / Assistance.
>
>
>
>
>
> [J6PE8E-0WQN]

 

 
John Zahl and Joanne Thomas
 
 
John Zahl and Joanne Thomas

John Joseph Zahl was born in 1950 in Morris, Minnesota and graduated from Morris High School in 1967. He briefly attended St. Cloud State University before joining the United States Navy where he served as a Russian linguist. He has four children – Jennifer, Sarah, Andrew and Daniel from his first marriage. In 1981 he moved to Grand Forks, North Dakota where he started his career with Federal Express.

Elizabeth Joanne Thomas was born in 1961 in Winnipeg, Manitoba and graduated from Pierre Radisson Collegiate in 1979. She moved to Grand Forks, North Dakota in 1980 to attend University of North Dakota. She was employed at United Hospital there.

John and Joanne met in Grand Forks in 1985 and after a whirlwind romance they were married in December of that year. They moved to Albuquerque, New Mexico in 1987 where they made their home of 30 years. John graduated from University of New Mexico and continued his career with Federal Express until his retirement. He then worked part-time with troubled youth in the Albuquerque Public School System. Joanne completed her degree at University of Phoenix and was employed with Eye Associates and University of New Mexico Hospital before finishing her career as a health systems administrator with Health Care Services Corporation. While in New Mexico, they adopted and raised their grandchildren, Justin and Riley. In 2017 they found their dream home in Portapique, Nova Scotia and lived there until the time of their death.

John and Joanne were active in their community. John was an Elder in their local Presbyterian Church in Albuquerque and both John and Joanne remained in close contact with the congregation after they moved to Nova Scotia. They were also very active in supporting animal rescue organizations and adopted dogs and cats of their own. Joanne served on the board of directors of TREY (Trauma Recovery for Exploited Youth) and worked for her local church, St. James Presbyterian as a volunteer for the Laundry Project, helping indigent people. John volunteered at the church as well.

John and Joanne loved to travel and made new friends wherever they went. They were loved and will be deeply missed. Their sudden and untimely death on April 18, 2020 has devastated their family; we take comfort in knowing that they were together during this tragedy and would have found comfort and strength in each other. John and Joanne are now at peace in God’s eternal Kingdom.

Arrangements have been entrusted to Mattatall – Varner Funeral Home, 55 Young Street, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada. If so desired, donations in John and Joanne’s name may be made to your local humane society or a charity of your choice. Private messages of condolence may be sent to the family by viewing John and Joanne’s obituary on-line and selecting "Send A Condolence" at: www.mattatallvarnerfh.com

 

'She was just like an angel': Winnipeg-born woman believed to be victim of Nova Scotia shooting

Elizabeth Joanne Thomas and her husband, John Joseph Zahl, are presumed dead

A woman who grew up in Winnipeg is believed to be one of the 22 victims killed in this weekend's shooting in rural Nova Scotia, one of the worst mass killings in Canadian history.

Elizabeth Joanne Thomas, 58, who went by Joanne or Jo, grew up in Winnipeg's Windsor Park neighbourhood. Thomas and her husband, John Joseph Zahl, 69, are presumed dead after their home near Portapique was found burned to the ground on Sunday morning. 

Police say a gunman went on a rampage that began late Saturday in the small community of Portapique and ended 12 hours later in Enfield, N.S., nearly 100 kilometres south. The gunman was fatally shot by police officers.

The couple lived next door to the man police say was responsible for the killings.

The couple's family hope they will remembered for more than how they died.

 "They lived a good life, they were devoted to each other, almost 35 years of marriage, they loved their children fiercely and afforded them as many opportunities to travel and experience a wonderful life," said Joanne's sister Lori Thomas from her home in Brandon. Man.

Lori last spoke to her sister on Friday, when the pair chatted about cooking and gardening and Joanne feeding the wildlife that would visit their acreage in Nova Scotia.

"This is extraordinarily difficult," she said.

 "We are so overwhelmed and so shocked. It has not hit me exactly as I know it will later on, but I have to be strong," said Lori, who cares for their youngest sibling, who has special needs.

The couple had moved to the Portapique area in 2017 to spend their retirement, family says. (Go Fund Me/Gena Lawson)

The couple had several children — four from John's previous marriage and two adopted sons, who were their grandkids that they raised as their own.

John Zahl's daughter and Joannne's step-daughter, Jennifer Zahl Bruland, lives in Minnesota, and heard news of the shooting on Sunday.

"I immediately tried to contact them and didn't get responses, and they were always very good at getting back to me so I started getting worried Sunday evening," Jennifer said.

While her parents' remains have not been found, Jennifer said the family is slowly coming to terms with what's happened.

"I've seen pictures, I know that my parents' house is gone," she said, from her home in St. Cloud, Minn.

"I know they are missing and presumed dead.

"It's devastating, it's nothing I ever expected to happen."

Jennifer wants her parents to be remembered for the lives they lived, not what happened to them.

"They were loved by family and friends from Manitoba, from New Mexico, from Minnesota, from Nova Scotia, but we are stunned, we're struggling because this is a senseless act and it's affected so many families," she said.

"I'd like people to remember my dad and Joanne for the kind acts that they did and the laughter and the joy that they shared with so many people."

'They were kind people'

Joanne met her husband while living in North Dakota to attend college, where she was studying speech pathology. 

"They met and they fell in love almost immediately, it was like a whirlwind romance," said Jennifer.  "They knew they were right for each other, they were very much in love."

From there they moved to Albuquerque, N.M., where John worked for FedEx, and Joanne later worked for Blue Cross Blue Shield. 

Joanne and John met while they were both living in North Dakota. (Go Fund Me/Gena Lawson)

The couple retired in 2017 and moved to Nova Scotia. 

The couple embraced the community there and Joanne volunteered with the homeless, did fundraising projects for their church, and helped victims of human trafficking. 

"They were kind people, they were generous people," Jennifer said.

Despite having spent several years in the U.S., Joanne was a proud Canadian, and never gave up her citizenship, Jennifer said. 

"My dad fell in love with Canada," she said.

Jennifer remembers visits to Winnipeg with her parents and her stepmother always spoke of her the city she grew up in fondly.

"She always had a Jeanne's cake for her birthday and whenever my dad would pass through Winnipeg … he would pick up a Jeanne's cake for her," she said.

"Jeanne's cakes are a big deal for the family."

'Your life does change in a heartbeat'

Joanne's son, Justin Zahl, said while he spent much of his time growing up in the U.S., he recalls summer trips to Manitoba, where the family would spend time with Thomas's parents . 

"She loved it," Justin said. 

"She obviously had lots of friends there."

He said he is still waiting for more information to emerge from investigators and is trying to take things one day at a time and reflects on his mother's generous spirit.

"She was just like an angel," he said. 

"She would help anyone, it doesn't matter … even the person, the killer, she would've helped him. He lived right next door."

Joanne's friend, Rhonda MacLellan, also said if Joanne had heard gunshots, she would have gone to try to help.

"They're not the kind of people who would say, 'That's none of our business, let's not be concerned,'" said MacLellan. "If somebody needed help, they would part the Red Sea."

'Get-things-done' woman

MacLellan said Joanne was a friend who always gave her comic relief and was someone with whom she could share her heart. She said she was playful, exuberant and a "get-things-done woman."

She said they actually first met at a funeral. When MacLellan arrived, she took the last empty seat in the hall — right next to Joanne.

When she sat down, Joanne joked that MacLellan probably lucked into a good parking spot as well. When MacLellan said that she had, Joanne joked again, "I knew you lived a charmed life."

     A picture of Rhonda MacLellan, taken by Joanne Thomas, on the back deck of Thomas and Zahl's home in Portapique, N.S. (Rhonda MacLellan/Facebook)

"It was just such a lovely line: 'I knew you lived a charmed life," MacLellan told CBC.

"I just thought, 'I like this woman.' And I was just so happy that she liked me too and we just sort of hit it off."

MacLellan wrote a tribute to her friend and said she's been overwhelmed by the kind responses.

MacLellan said Joanne and her husband "didn't know a soul" when they moved to the area, but had quickly started to become rooted in the community.

"She right away got in and served and helped. If she would have been here 20 years, she would have known everybody in the town," MacLellan said.

The couple were supposed to be away on a European cruise, but had to cancel due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Physical distancing guidelines have made it hard for the family to grieve, Lori said. She says under normal circumstances she'd want to be out east  to support her nephews and be together as a family.

"To feed people, to hug people, to organize, to comfort, and my ability right now to do so is very limited," Lori said.

"This is not just a community tragedy or a familial tragedy, this has become a national tragedy, human contact is so important."

"Love your family and hold them close, because your life does change in a heartbeat," she said.

With files from Bryce Hoye, Emma Davie

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 

13 deadly hours: The Nova Scotia mass shooting - The Fifth Estate

571,411 views
Nov 24, 2020
 700K subscribers
The Fifth Estate conducts a comprehensive inquiry into the 13 hours of mayhem that constitute one of Canada's deadliest events. We hear from families of many of the 22 victims, and the terrible final moments their loved ones faced. Many questions remain about how the RCMP responded to the situation, and whether enough was done to protect the community. In one case, we show the RCMP was told of the presence of the shooter in a police cruiser hours before they acknowledged knowing this information. The piece explores the red flags police knew about with respect to the shooter, and presents a critical analysis of what went wrong on that April weekend.
 
 
 
 

Neighbour tried to sell his Portapique home to killer before last April’s shootings

A victim of last April's shootings tried to sell his home in Portapique to the killer before last April’s bloodbath that left 22 people dead.

Aaron Tuck — who was killed in the massacre along with his wife, Jolene Oliver, and their 17-year-old daughter, Emily Tuck  — “wanted to sell his house in Portapique and move back to Cape Breton and wanted $48,000 to $58,000 for it,” according to court documents made public by a judge Friday. 

The information police used to get search warrants in the case indicate one of Aaron Tuck’s friends since he was 13 years old told investigators that the killer  —  whom SaltWire is not naming  — offered Tuck $18,000 for the small dilapidated house with a view of the ocean.  

The friend told police he saw Aaron Tuck “get into an argument” over the lowball offer with the man who would end up killing him. 

“Aaron Tuck had issues with a buddy (of the killer) who was operating his four-wheeler on Aaron’s property and Aaron Tuck ended up getting in a fight with the (killer’s) buddy,” said Tuck’s friend. 

“A day after the fight both (the killer) and his buddy apologized to Aaron Tuck.”

Aaron Tuck, right, his daughter Emily Tuck, left, and partner Jolene Oliver, were all victims of the mass shooting on the weekend of April 18-19, 2020. - Facebook

Tuck’s friend “said that Aaron Tuck was bothered by the fact that (the killer) had a RCMP police car and he told Aaron to report it to Crimestoppers and Aaron Tuck said that he could not due to (the killer) making a threat towards Aaron Tuck,” said the documents used to obtain warrants. 

The friend knew the killer “had a holster for a gun in the back of the RCMP police car,” said the documents.

“At the end of 2019, Aaron Tuck told (the friend) that you could not tell the difference between (the killer’s) RCMP police car and a real one,” said the documents, which note Tuck did not help the killer with any of the decals on the vehicle.  

The killings started in Portapique, where the Dartmouth denturist had a cottage, on April 18 after he snapped, according to his spouse. The murderer shot multiple people and set homes on fire.   

Dressed in a police uniform and driving a fake police car, he evaded RCMP and killed four more people in Wentworth before heading toward Halifax, killing several more along the way, including at least two women in their cars. Mounties said they shot him dead April 19 at the Enfield Big Stop. In all, he killed 22 people.   

'Tied her hands together'

The killings started after the Dartmouth denturist’s common-law partner, Lisa Banfield, got upset while they were having drinks while Facetiming friends in Houlton, Maine to celebrate their 19th anniversary. The comment came after the killer and Banfield told their friends they were planning a commitment ceremony for their 20th anniversary. 

“She had said ‘Don’t do it,’ and I got upset that she said that so I said I’m leaving and (the killer) got pissed off,” about that, his spouse told police. 

The killer “got mad and accused Lisa of ruining their anniversary,” Banfield told police. 

She tried to apologize, but when that didn’t work, she went to bed naked. She pretended to be asleep before the killer pulled the blankets off her. 

He got Banfield out of the bed “and had her on the floor and was pulling her hair and kicking her,” Banfield told police.

She got up and he “kicked her again and she fell to the floor.” 

The killer “tied her hands together with what she thought was a belt off of a bathrobe,” she said.

Items of condolence overflow on the steps and yard in front of the old Portapique Church on July 23, 2020. - Eric WynneItems of condolence overflow on the steps and yard in front of the old Portapique Church on July 23, 2020. - Eric Wynne

He was pouring gas around their Portapique cottage “and said that he could not forget his gun,” she said. 

He grabbed a Glock handgun with a laser sight on it and warned her not to slip on the gasoline. The killer torched the place as they left.  

“Lisa Banfield said that she was being forcibly escorted back to (the killer’s nearby) warehouse and she was screaming and trying to kick (him) and trying to dig her heels into the ground.” 

The killer “told her that they were going to Dartmouth (where he had an office on Portland Street with an apartment above) and she believed that he would burn that place too.” 

He told her they were going to another place that is redacted from the documents, with plans to kill the occupants and burn that as well. 

“At one point during the walk to the warehouse, Lisa did manage to get away from (the killer) but tripped and fell and (he) found her easily and called her an idiot and told her that he had a flashlight.” 

'It didn't have to be this way'

The killer took Banfield’s shoes “and threw them in opposite directions and said, ‘now you can’t run bitch,’” she told police. 

At the nearby warehouse where he stored motorcycles and other gear, he poured gas on a truck before trying to put handcuffs on Banfield. 

“Lisa Banfield told (the killer) that it didn’t have to be this way and (he) said that it was too late and put a handcuff on one hand on Lisa and she dropped to the floor when he tried to put on the other handcuff.”

He made Banfield stand up by pulling her hair, “and she heard a shot on one side of her and then another on the other side. Lisa covered her face with her hands and thought that (her common-law spouse) was going to shoot her.” 

Instead, he forced her into the back of one of his fake police cars and locked her inside.  

When he walked away to get more guns, she managed to crawl out of the car and escape.  

She ran and heard shots, hiding briefly in a truck before moving on, believing the shots “seemed to be getting closer.”

Hid in the roots of a tree

“She left that hiding spot and eventually came across a tree with an exposed root system and hid inside the cavity,” Banfield told police. 

She stayed hidden all night, only coming out in the morning. 

“Lisa Banfield has had guilty feelings and wonders if (her partner) went to the locations that Lisa might attend to get help and killed the people as he went along. Lisa questions whether people would have died if she didn’t run away.” 

In the days before the killings, her partner “was very caught up with COVID-19 and was talking about death and said that he knew he was going to die,” Banfield told police. 

While he’d “seemed like the perfect guy at first,” the killer had become controlling over time, she told police.

'Never liked kids'

“Lisa is close with her family and (the killer) never understood this and would get upset. (He) never liked kids and Lisa would keep nieces away from him. (He) always said things about hurting her family so she was afraid to leave (him).” 

During a trip to Cuba years earlier, the killer had beaten up his father. The father “spoke to Lisa later that evening and said ‘I was a bastard to my wife. I was a bastard to my son and you need to leave (him) now.’” 

The killer “had nothing to do with his parents” or his uncle (an RCMP officer) and his wife. 

The killer “cut family off after there was a dispute over ownership of a house” with his uncle.  

Banfield “recalled a domestic incident where (her spouse) was choking her outside and (his uncle) came up and said, ‘You are just like your father.’ Lisa said that (her partner) had also choked her while in bed a few times and it was the little things that would set him off, not the big things.” 

When asked about the people he killed in Portapique, “Banfield said that she never really bothered with the neighbours, Greg and Jamie Blair and it was (her partner) that made connections with people, mostly when they were drinking.” 

Banfield said she “did not trust Lisa McCully (another neighbour her spouse killed) and didn’t know if she and (her partner) did anything.” 

She also told police the killer “had cheated on her many times.”

Banfield told police Alanna Jenkins and Sean McLeod  — two corrections officers who he killed on Hunter Road just north of Wentworth  — “were an odd couple,” and that she believed her spouse got his handcuffs and a prison guard uniform from McLeod. 

The couple would come over for drinks and the killer “seemed to like them both and there were never any arguments. Lisa Banfield said that (the killer) always wanted to collect uniforms.” 

'Humiliate her at times'

Banfield worked at his denture clinic, waxing and polishing dentures, taking payments and cleaning the offices. The killer “would humiliate her at times in front of a patient and would say that he needed to (make) her feel like a piece of shit,” she told police. 

Her partner didn’t care for the police, she said. He “would say the police think they are smart and say that it would be easy to kill them.” 

She knew “he was different but never thought he would do what he did.” 

She said the killer would tell a friend in Maine what kind of gun he wanted and the friend would get it for him. The killer had “told her how he would wrap firearms and place them in the tonneau cover in order to transport them back to Canada from the United States.” 

Pistols on his nightstand 

She told police he kept pistols on his nightstand in the bedroom “and talked a lot about guns.” 

A friend of the killer’s from Toronto, Kevin Von Bargen, told police that the Dartmouth denturist talked to him after the pandemic began “and was convinced that the world economy was going to collapse and he contacted CIBC to redeem his GICs and cash them out.”

They were “pretty strong” friends and had confided in each other in the past, Von Bargen told police, noting the killer “did not talk about having a grudge against anyone.” 

The killer had been married about 20 years ago and “the separation was amicable,” he told police, noting the killer “was culpable for some infidelity in that relationship.” 

Von Bargan told police the killer “had a deal in the works with respect to his property in Dartmouth and was planning on retiring outright.” 

The killer “talked about his parents being odd and very self-centred and how he learned about 10 years ago that he had a brother who had been put up for adoption in the U.S. (The killer) had tried hard to establish a relationship with his brother but his brother did not reciprocate.” 

Obsessions switched

In the last year of his life, the killer’s “switched from being obsessed with vintage Honda motorcycles to police cars and was buying the cars off a government surplus website,” Von Bargan told police. 

The killer told him “he had the one (with decals on it) for show and said that it looked cool in the shop and had $12,000-$15,000 invested in it.” 

Von Bargen also told police the killer “had a truck driver that would do runs between Toronto and Halifax and (the Dartmouth denturist) would give the driver teeth and the driver didn’t charge courier fees because of this.” 

Uniforms could have come from cousin's closet

A cousin who had been an RCMP officer told police the killer had visited him in 2011-12 before he retired from the force “and was at his house for a week and would have had access to his police uniforms as they were hanging in the closet.” 

The same cousin told police he gave the killer his red serge uniform and high brown boots and that they were on display at his cottage. 

The former cop told police he knew his cousin “was capable of killing someone, maybe his parents or Lisa, but he never thought that (he) would go on a rampage.” 

FBI agent Raymond Goergen told Canadian investigators that the killer used a friend’s address in Houlton, Maine, to receive shipments of boxes. The friend opened one up once to see it was a light bar. 

The killer’s friend, whose name is redacted, told Goergen two of his Glock pistols were missing and the Dartmouth denturist had access to his house. 

The friend who would shoot for target practice with the killer at a quarry  said he hadn’t checked the gun boxes in four or five years. But the FBI agent “said that the boxes were not dusty and were sitting on the floor in a closet.” 

Share story: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

She had a bad date with the future mass murderer, went back to his apartment, and an RCMP officer walked in

a building with giant teeth attached

The killer’s property in Dartmouth in 2019. The teeth were removed from the building days after the mass shootings, and the building was subsequently razed. — Google Maps

She was out with friends, having drinks at The Thirsty Duck on Spring Garden Road.

“I happened to be talking about my teeth… I wanted to get them laminated,” said the woman, who is referred to in Mass Casualty Commission documents as QQ. QQ gave a statement to RCMP Cst. Jennifer Tichonchuck in February of 2021, but the events in question happened in the fall of 2000.

“And I never knew he was even in this world,” QQ continued, “but he was standing I guess behind me or he was listening to me. And he interjected by saying, ‘I wouldn’t do that if I were you.'”

Twenty years later, the man killed 22 people in a murderous spree across Nova Scotia. The Halifax Examiner refers to him as GW.

GW, a denturist, told QQ about dental bleaching. Then he asked her out. “And I said yes.”

About a week later, GW picked QQ up for a date, and they went shopping at Costco. “Or he did,” said QQ. “It’s like money wasn’t an option and he wanted me to know it.”

From Costco, they drove to GW’s apartment above the denturist office on Portland Street. He dropped her off in front so he could park behind the building, then walked back around to let her in. They went upstairs.

“He talked a lot about himself,” said QQ.

GW told her about his recent divorce, which he explained came about because his wife discovered he was cheating with someone who leased a room in their apartment. This corresponds with his ex-wife’s statement to police; she said the other woman had taken denturist classes with GW.

Then balding, GW showed QQ a photo of himself with a full head of hair. “And you know, I mean, he was an extremely good looking guy, you know.”

GW lit a fire in the fireplace.

“And then he had a visitor.”

“We were in the living room,” explained QQ. “And it’s one thing led to another… and you know, he made a comment because — he didn’t make it any secret that he was very well endowed. Scary, actually. Freakish. Definitely not normal.”

“I was getting bad vibes, and we were in the living room,” continued QQ. “It was around midnight, I would say. It was late. And it was winter.”

She heard someone open the back door, then kick their boots on the ground to get the snow off.

“He didn’t knock. And he, it was an RCMP officer… he just walked right in, like it was your brother.”

QQ described the man: early 30s, dark complexion, dark hair, about the same height as GW. He looked like he worked out, but he wasn’t bulky.

An RCMP forage cap. Photo: saskcollections.org

“His ears stuck out. He had big ears. I thought, ‘man, you’re going to hold up that hat real good.'”

He removed his hat. It was a “hard hat, the normal police hat,” said QQ. “We call them a forage cap,” said Tichonchuck, the investigator.

And QQ remembered a yellow stripe going up his pant leg.

GW introduced the man to QQ, but 20 years later, she couldn’t remember the name.

The man in the police uniform told GW there was a break-in in the area, but that didn’t sound right to QQ. “I thought, hmmm, this is not your area, you’re RCMP. You’re not near where you’re supposed to be.”

The man in the police uniform soon left, and then GW stood up, put on a black parka, and grabbed a slingshot.

“I thought he was joking,” said QQ. “He said, ‘no, I gotta go outside for a minute.’… What he did was he put a marble through an apartment building; I guess he felt someone was making too much noise… and he put a marble through their living room window.”

The date got stranger still. GW would leave the room occasionally — QQ thought he was sneaking drinks, and as the night went on GW was getting increasingly drunk.

She was hungry, but his refrigerator was empty, and he wouldn’t take her to get food.

He told her he had paid his way through university by smuggling cigarettes and alcohol across the border, and then he had been an embalmer. He explained that there were “two ways how to drain bodies.” QQ described the two ways to Tichonchuck. “I’m like, oh my gosh, this is gross.”

Getting still more drunk, GW told QQ that when he was working in the denturist shop, he would masturbate several times a day. “Like why are you telling me this?”

In the morning, she didn’t see GW so she decided to “skim my behind out of there,” but then he re-appeared. “He was jumping around and he was nude. I was grossed out. This is [inaudible] would up. And he was proud of it. And I’m thinking this is getting crazier and crazier.”

That was the only time QQ went to GW’s apartment. She thinks she went on “a couple of dates” with him, but within a week or two, she decided she needed to end it.

“He became very possessive, real quick,” she explained. “Trying to lock me down.”

She decided to take him back to the “crime scene” — The Thirsty Duck. “And I brought someone that would come on to him” — her cousin Kim.

“And he fell for it.”

Kim and QQ went to The Thirsty Duck washroom, and Kim told her that GW was grabbing her ass. “So, I was like, Bingo!” said QQ.

The women returned to the table and started chatting with GW, and QQ told him it wasn’t working out. “And oh my good lord,” said QQ, “he had a temper.”

GW told QQ she was making the biggest mistake of her life.

“Anyhow, that was fairly early in the night,” she said. “And then it was a band playing, and then he had some girl.”

Two decades later, after the mass murders and all the publicity, it occurred to QQ that the “girl” GW was with that night was Lisa Banfield. “It’s like the same hairdo, same colouring, and you know, it appeared to be her.” Multiple witnesses have said that Lisa Banfield met GW in a bar, but the name of the bar doesn’t appear in any of the documents released publicly so far.

“So I got out of there, and that was it,” said QQ.

QQ was direct in her criticism of the RCMP. When she learned who the killer was, “I thought, there’s no way on God’s green earth he got away with this and no one in the RCMP knew about it.”

At the beginning of the interview, Tichonchuck mentioned that QQ had provided a statement soon after the murders. That previous statement has not yet been made public by the Mass Casualty Commission.


Comments

Sadly this doesn’t surprise me. In my opinion I think the killer had friends in law enforcement and it helped. I could be wrong just get that impression over what’s been reported so far

 

 
 

N.S. mass killer had an affair with neighbour he later murdered

Lisa McCully, died April 18, 2020, one of the victims on the first day of Nova Scotia's mass killing spree.  - Lisa McCully / Facebook
Lisa McCully was gunned down April 18, 2020 in the front yard of her home. - Lisa McCully / Facebook

Gabriel Wortman had an affair with a Portapique neighbour who would years later become one of his 22 victims, then after it ended, he both helped and harassed Lisa McCully. 

“Lisa Delong, a friend of Lisa McCully, told the RCMP that Ms. McCully and the perpetrator were engaged in an ongoing ‘affair’ in 2017,” say documents tabled Tuesday at the Mass Casualty Commission. 

“Ms. McCully told her that she was experiencing a lot of stress because of the situation with the perpetrator, whom she felt was pursuing a relationship with her.” 

In the May 2020 interview, Delong told the RCMP the situation caused McCully a lot of stress. 

“She was in love with him and was very confused because … she had been of the understanding that he was not in a relationship, but it appeared to her then that … there was a partner that was in the picture,” Delong said.  

She told investigators Wortman, who had a common-law wife in Lisa Banfield, might have “misrepresented” his relationship status to McCully. 

'She just saw the good in people'

McCully never expressed a fear of Wortman, Delong said. “She just saw the good in people.” 

Wortman would give her alcohol and small gifts, the schoolteacher told her friend.

McCully was “having lots of difficulty herself financially,” according to Delong. 

He “would make all these offers that he would absorb her debt, or he would pay off her bills and then just nothing (seemed) to materialize,” said her friend. “And, she was very confused about … what was going on.” 

When McCully’s brother died in September of 2017, the Dartmouth denturist came over to console her and helped her through the funeral process, according to Kelly Tattrie, who dated McCully for a couple of months in 2018. 

'Things crossed the line'

After that, Tattrie told RCMP in a May 2020 interview, “things crossed the line.” 

McCully told him she and Wortman hadn’t been in a relationship, but that they “slept together … a couple of times.” 

Tattrie asked McCully if Wortman had a partner, because he’d seen another woman at his place in Portapique. “And she said, ‘Yes, but she doesn’t know about it and I’d prefer if she doesn’t know about that.’” 

She “felt she was taken advantage of because of her emotional state,” Tattrie said. 

'It should never have happened'

McCully was embarrassed about getting involved with Wortman, he said. “It should never have happened,” she told Tattrie. “I was just in a really bad place.”

When he and McCully dated, Wortman would sometimes follow them in a car as they went for walks on the beach, watching them, which Tattrie deemed odd.  “I actually told Lisa at the time, ‘That guy’s creeping me out.’ And she said, ‘He’s fine,’ and whatnot. I think he still had quite an interest in Lisa, at that time. But she did not want anything to continue with him.” 

McCully told her friend Melanie Maloney that when her children were little, she would go over to talk with Wortman over a glass of wine once her kids had gone to sleep. “It was nice to have another adult to talk to,” Maloney told the RCMP  

“When she was having trouble with her finances he had offered to buy her house and let her live in it for free.”  

'That doesn't sound right'

Maloney warned the single mother against entering into such a scheme. “I just remember saying to her … that doesn’t sound right.” 

When McCully — who bought her Portapique home from Wortman’s uncle, Glynn, a decade before the mass shootings — told her pal about sleeping with the Dartmouth denturist, her friend thought “it seemed so predatory … (and) opportunistic … I just remember being worried for her.” 

On the flip side, John Kierstead, McCully’s father, told the RCMP in May of 2020 that Wortman had helped with negotiations when his daughter bought her place fully furnished. Wortman was “most cordial” at the time, said Kierstead, who suspected the denturist had romantic designs on his daughter.  

But McCully knew Wortman had a “live-in girlfriend,” Kierstead said. “She did not want to get caught in this triangle of (jealousy).” 

McCully “just let that relationship go. She remained friends with him, but she realized she was out of her league with him,” said her father. 

“He was just a little bit too … much for her,” Kierstead said. 

Two or three years before Wortman killed 22 people, including McCully, in April 2022, he helped her fix a backed-up septic tank. “Dug it up, replaced the drainage, (and it) didn’t cost her a penny,” Kierstead said. “Which was very good of him.” 

'Someone creeping around her house'

In the year before the killings, McCully told her friend Chad MacPherson that she’d called the Mounties to report “someone creeping around her house.” 

At the time, she’d suspected a former partner. But his alibi checked out, leaving McCully “always a little bit uneasy” about her situation, according to MacPherson, who spoke to investigators the day after his friend was killed.  

Just before the murders, McCully had told MacPherson’s wife, who taught at the same school, that “she was concerned that the neighbour across the road was being a little too weird. Walking up the road, pausing in front of her house, looking in the windows, that sort of thing.” 

McCully dated Portapique resident Leon Joudrey for a short time in the summer of 2019. Joudrey told police after the mass murders that Wortman’s behaviour towards him changed after McCully told the denturist they could no longer be friends.  

'You trying to poke the bear?'

“I said, ‘What did you do that for?’” Joudrey told investigators. 

“You trying to poke the bear?” 

Joudrey wasn’t happy about that turn of events as it meant a job he’d been hoping to do cutting trees down for Wortman fell through. “He was acting like an idiot, so I walked away.” 

About three weeks before the killings, Joudrey encountered Wortman in front of McCully’s house. “He gave me a big grin when I walked by,” Joudrey said.  

Joudrey said he backtracked to ask Wortman what his problem was, but when he got close, the denturist drove away in one of his surplus police cars, which did not have decals on it. “I didn’t have the chance to say anything. He took off.”  

Soon after, Joudrey heard Wortman gunning his car up and down Portapique Beach Road. “I thought to myself, ‘What a fucking asshole.’” 

'Very uncomfortable'

McCully told her friend Miriam Louise Cleogh, who bought a cottage in Portapique a decade ago, that she was “very uncomfortable” because she knew Wortman had weapons. 

“Do I think she ever knew what type of weapons? I doubt it.” 

McCully told Cleogh that it concerned her because her children spent time with Wortman, and that she had asked him not to talk about guns with her kids. 

McCully told her friend Ruth Janes that she'd had a brief fling with Wortman, but he “had way too many problems for her to date.” 

She also told Janes that Wortman “wasn’t a good role model for her kids and he had a lot of problems and she knew he had girlfriends.”  

Share story:
 
 
 
 

A month before the mass murders, the perpetrator went to Pictou to kill someone else

a fire

On March 19, 2020, the Washtub Laundromat in Pictou burned down. Photo: Brian Cameron

March 19, 2020, was an eventful night in Pictou.

“Fire lit up the night sky on the Pictou waterfront,” reported Adam MacInnis for the New Glasgow News.

The fire started at the Washtub Laundromat on Caladh Avenue, and spread to the adjacent enviro-depot. Firefighters feared that the fire would further spread to the nearby Coleraine Plaza seniors building, and so had that building evacuated.

The fire was dramatic and worrying enough, but also that night, the man who a month later killed 22 people in a murderous spree showed up at Acropole Pizza on Church Street. The Halifax Examiner refers to the man as GW.

GW was in Pictou looking for Kip MacKenzie. GW wanted to kill Kip.

The RCMP only found out about this in late April, after the murders, because Kip, who was on a police undertaking, hadn’t been seen for a few days. Cst. Ryan Murnaghan went to the pizza shop to look for him. A worker at the pizza place, Donald MacMillan, said oh, by the way, that killer was here back in March.

Murnaghan went to talk with Kimo Poirier, who lived next door to the burned out laundromat. Kimo “is well-known in Pictou,” reported Kevin Adshade for Saltwire, but not so well-known that Murnaghan knew his last name.

Kimo had seen Kip just the day before, said Murnaghan in an email to Sergeant Jonathan Kenny. Kimo said that Kip had told him GW was in town looking to kill him.

Both MacMillan and Kimo had the same basic story: six or seven years previously, Kip inherited some property in Fredericton, New Brunswick, but GW felt the property was rightly his. GW confronted Kip about it, and Kip, who was very drunk, signed some paperwork that gave GW title to the property. Some time after that, Kip, realizing what had happened, “knocked out” GW. GW had come to Pictou for revenge, by killing Kip.

Kip MacKenzie gave a statement to the RCMP in May 2020; the Mass Casualty Commission has that statement, but isn’t yet making it public or available for review by reporters, pending a privacy review.

Without MacKenzie’s statement, it’s impossible to know for sure, but the property in question may have once belonged to Tom Evans, the lawyer friend of GW’s who died in 2009 and willed GW much of his estate.

“It’s not too far of a stretch,” wrote Murnaghan to Kenny, “knowing what we know about [GW], that if he was in town that day, he could have burnt down the laundry mat to flush Kip out, put heat on him or thought he was living there. But I will leave that up to MCU [Major Crime Unit].”

In fact, though, another man had already been arrested for the March 19 fire, and for a series of other fires in Pictou on other days. On April 15, a 55-year-old man from New Brunswick was arrested and given an August 2020 court date for the fires. New reports and RCMP releases about the arrest don’t name the man, and there are no further new reports about him.

Did GW leave Hunter Road to look for Kip MacKenzie?

Alanna Jenkins and Sean McLeod. Photo: Facebook

Another document that the Mass Casualty Commission has and is not yet making public — but which has been reviewed by the Halifax Examiner — reveals that a relative of Sean McLeod told a third party that McLeod was in Portapique on April 18, 2020, about seven hours before the murders began.

According to this person, McLeod “was chopping wood for him [GW]” and when Lisa Banfield and GW went for a drive at about 3pm, McLeod went home to Hunter Road.

The murders in Portapique began at 10pm, and GW spent the night behind a welding shop in the Debert Industrial Park.

When GW left his hiding spot, he went to Hunter Road, about 50 kilometres north, and killed Sean McLeod, his partner Alana Jenkins, and neighbour Tom Bagley.

The Mass Casualty Commission “foundational document” about the Hunter Road murders details that GW’s fake police car was captured on video passing a residence somewhat south of the McLeod/Jenkins house at 6:29am, heading north. The same video captured the car heading south at 9:23am.

Neighbours to McLeod and Jenkins reported hearing gunshots at various times, but as is typical with accounts from multiple witnesses, the accounts don’t completely line up. That said, there seem to be two general time periods when gunshots were heard — at around just after 6:30am, and then again at just before 9am.

Tom Bagley left for his walk at around 8:50am. The first report of smoke from the scene was about 9am.

So far as is known, GW arrived at the house at about 6:35am and immediately shot McLeod, Jenkins, and their two dogs. He then did — what? — for two and a half hours before setting the house on fire, killing retired firefighter Tom Bagley, who arrived at the scene to help, and then left the scene.

This is speculation, but consider an alternative theory: GW killed McLeod and Jenkins, then left — possibly to travel north on Hunter Road out to Highway 6 to Pictou, to look for Kip MacKenzie. Then, failing to find MacKenzie, he reversed course and returned to Hunter Road. At the speed limit, the round trip would take about two hours. That would give him enough time to make it back to the McLeod/Jenkins residence, set it on fire, kill Bagley, then travel south past the Hunter Road video camera at 9:23am.

Again, that’s speculation. But it would be good to know if the RCMP canvassed video cameras along Highway 6 or in Pictou.


 
 

 https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featured/a-greedy-overbearing-little-bastard-the-life-of-a-terrible-man-from-university-asshole-to-mass-murderer/

 

‘A greedy, overbearing, little bastard’: the life of a terrible man, from university ‘asshole’ to mass murderer

This article includes detailed descriptions of violence.

Yesterday, we recounted the multi-generational violence in the Wortman family. The man the Halifax Examiner refers to as GW was of the fourth generation of that family, and as an adult murdered 22 people across Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020.

GW’s upbringing “turned him into a greedy, overbearing, little bastard,” said his uncle Glynn Wortman.

Today, we detail GW’s violence towards and manipulation of others throughout his life before the murders.

Leaving home

a stone house

Bridges House. Photo: University of New Brunswick archives

After a tumultuous childhood in the Moncton area, in 1986 GW moved to Fredericton to attend the University of New Brunswick.

A man referred to as BM was a roommate of GW at Bridges House, a dorm, for about four months. In an police interview a few days after the murders, BM referred to GW as a “bizarre individual” who would stay out all night, brag about his sexual exploits, and get into protracted arguments with other students.

GW went out of his way to antagonize people by, for example, pissing on the common bathroom floor.

Two of BM’s toes are webbed together, and GW threatened to cut them apart when BM was asleep. “I’ll never forget he said that,” said BM.

Once, a group of students went to Zellers, and GW was shoplifting, “he’s like stuffing stuff in his jacket, he was just a bizarre guy.”

For his behaviour, his dormmates gave GW the “Chuck Cosby award,” a secret award for being the asshole of the year.

BM said GW hung out with a “jerk bag lawyer” — BM couldn’t remember the lawyer’s name, but it was likely Tom Evans, with whom GW had a long friendship.

“And I think he used to pay him for services rendered, if you want to put it that way,” said BM. “It was weird. He always claimed he had some sort of relationship with this guy, right? And you know it was bizarre to say the least; he was dating a woman at the same time. It was like kind of a weird, twisted thing.”

GW made lots of fake IDs, which BM assumed were used to buy alcohol. Multiple witnesses have said that GW paid his way through university by smuggling alcohol and cigarettes across the U.S. border to resell in Fredericton. But GW’s father Paul, who may not be a reliable source, told investigators that he spent about $100,000 in support of GW’s university education.

Move to Nova Scotia

GW got a “Psych degree” and a “business diploma” from UNB, said GW’s ex-wife, who is referred to as FF.

FF and GW met while at university. “He was very bright,” said FF. “He’s a very, very intelligent man and he could do just about anything. Like, he could fix a car, he could do carpentry work, he could do electrical, he could do a whole bunch of things. He was really handy… he was the very opposite to me as far as being able to do stuff and the way we thought about things.”

While still students, FF saw GW’s violent side. Once they were at the student union pub, and another man said something rude to FF. “All of a sudden, the guy was on the ground, and he was saying ‘apologize to her!'” The bouncers took GW off the man.

After university, GW worked in “child and youth” for the province of New Brunswick, but he didn’t like the profession “because there wasn’t enough  money in it.” GW found work at McAdam’s Funeral Home in Fredericton, and then the couple moved to Kentville, Nova Scotia so GW could get certified as an embalmer. He then found work at Walkers Funeral Home in Dartmouth.

The couple moved to an apartment above the funeral home on Prince Albert Road.

“I didn’t like it when he drank,” said FF. “He made me nervous.”

Halifax police records through this period show a number of police interactions with GW, including a missing persons report (filed by FF; GW was found), an angry interaction with a pawn shop operator (GW alleged the pawnshop was selling a boat that had been stolen from him five years previously), and an assault, on Nov. 24, 1996.

A man named Vincent McNeil said that he had been at a party where there was “free liquor” and went home, but then decided to go back to the party. En route, he walked through the funeral home parking lot and, he said, saw a man breaking the sideview mirror of a black jeep that turned out to belong to GW. McNeil yelled at the man and chased him, but GW heard the commotion and saw McNeil running, so assumed McNeil had broken the mirror.

“Vincent stated that [GW] kicked him in the left leg and punched him in the face twice, knocking him to the ground,” wrote Cst. James Henry MacVicar in the police report. GW demanded that McNeil pay for the damage, and McNeil handed over a ring and a bracelet that he said were valued at over $500.

McNeil called police the next day. MacVicar interviewed him, and then asked GW to come to the police station to give his side of the story. MacVicar sided with GW in the dispute, as he had no prior convictions. And McNeil had been drunk, after all, and “the writer feels that Vincent had fallen down on his face.”

GW made a career change.

“There wasn’t enough money in [embalming] for him,” explained FF. “He had bigger aspirations, so he decided to go into denturist.” He took classes at Nova Scotia Community College’s Akerley campus. FF supported GW financially for his three years of schooling. The couple rented an apartment at Pine and Myrtle Streets in Dartmouth.

One time, GW was drinking and FF somehow offended him — she didn’t remember the perceived offence, but he “pinned me down on the floor.” FF ran outside, yelling, and GW pulled her back inside. “I don’t remember what happened after that,” she said.

To make ends meet, the couple took in a roommate, a young woman, 19 or 20, whom GW met at denturist school. But the whole time, GW was having an affair with the younger woman. “I had zero idea, and really, I was flabbergasted. They were in my home and they lied to me so well every day that I had no clue.”

FF learned about the affair one day when she unexpectedly brought lunch to a denturist office GW was building on Almon Street, near the bus station. “I caught them kissing in the dentist chair. That didn’t go over so well.”

FF kicked the woman out of the apartment. GW apologized, but started drinking heavily, and the couple soon ended the marriage. GW bought the building on Portland Street and moved into the empty apartment above the space he made into a denturist office below.

Soon after, QQ met GW at The Thirsty Duck, and one night he brought her back to the apartment. GW may have met Lisa Banfield the very night QQ stopped dating GW. Read “She had a bad date with the future mass murderer, went back to his apartment, and an RCMP officer walked in.”

Denturist complaints

a building with giant teeth attached

The killer’s property in Dartmouth in 2019. The teeth were removed from the building days after the mass shootings. — Google Maps

Multiple witnesses reported that GW was alternately kind and abusive towards his denturist patients. He’d extend credit to those who didn’t have insurance, but if they were late on their payments, he’d violently attack them.

Paul Wortman, GW’s father, recounted two such incidents.

“There was a guy that was not paying him, and he was in the neighbourhood,” walking by the denturist shop on Portland Street. “My son ran out early in the morning, he was in his underwear, and grabbed onto the guy, and said ‘give me your teeth.'” The man refused to take his teeth out, so GW reached into his mouth and pulled them out himself. According to Paul, GW said, “these will be in my office; when you get the money, they’re yours.”

Another time, while GW was shopping, he happened upon a man who owed him money. GW “said ‘give me your teeth,’ and the guy gave him his teeth and my son squashed them.”

At least eight of GW’s patients made complaints to the Denturist Board of Nova Scotia.

Three of the complaints came before the board at roughly the same time. The three complained of an ill-tempered denturist who refused to adjust or fix ill-fitting dentures, and one, named BO in the documents, complained that GW used “sex talk” while treating her, and asked her what colour her underwear was.

In response, GW wrote a letter to the board saying the complaints were nonsense.

“Three complaints in a few months is a real eye-opener,” wrote GW. “Some members of the public feel they should have an unfettered right to complain and to have that complaint investigated.”

“I have never acted in a dishonorable, disgraceful or unprofessional way,” he continued. “One has to see clearly that these letters of complaint have been written with one purpose in mind, vengeance. Having said that, they are also fueled by bitterness. I am in the opinion that these women all in the same age group cannot bear the fact that they are aging, coupled with the lost [sic] of teeth send them into a whirlwind.”

With regards to BO’s complaint, GW wrote that “This is clearly a person who is not well. I personally cannot imagine ever having sex talk with a 52 year old endentulous woman just the bare thought makes me ill.”

After a series of complaints, the board assigned a consulting denturist to review GW’s work. According to a March 20, 2006 letter from Maureen Hope, the registrar of the board, GW inappropriately tried to interfere with the investigator by asking the consulting denturist to change his opinion.

In the end, the board reprimanded GW, suspended him for one month, charged him $8,000, and required him to attend a seminar entitled “Dealing With Difficult People: How to Communicate with Tact and Skill.”

Portapique

the green roadsign to Portapique with a tartan sash tied around the post

The Portapique sign on Highway 2 was adorned with a NS tartan sash following the mass shooting that began there on April 18, 2020. Photo: Joan Baxter

The documents released this week by the Mass Casualty Commission show that GW continued to get in physical altercations and was involved in abusive and controlling relationships.

This continued as GW bought a cottage and then built a warehouse in Portapique.

Brenda Forbes, who is testifying today at the commission’s proceedings, detailed much of that behaviour; see “Brenda Forbes tried to warn neighbours and the RCMP about the ‘psychopath’ in Portapique years before he went on his murderous rampage. No one listened.”

As the Examiner reported in April, GW had a sexual relationship with a Portapique woman referred to as EE, who encouraged GW to have sex with “street girls.” We reported:

EE described her sexual experiences with GW.

“He’d be the little boy and I’d be the mummy and I’d be the cop,” explained EE, who would wear an RCMP uniform GW provided to her for the event. “He was one of those diaper kind of guys, so you would have to take off his diaper and you would have to clean his bum with your tongue and stuff like that instead of toilet paper, I mean it wasn’t dirty or pooping or anything like that but it was just imaginary, just kind of weird stuff.”

GW had an RCMP uniform and what EE described as “ankle shackles.” As well, he had two pairs of handcuffs — not police handcuffs, but rather the kind bought at sex shops (EE worked at a sex shop and was familiar with them).

At one point, a woman referred to as DD came to live with EE in Portapique, and EE arranged a sexual encounter between GW and DD.

“You hear the guys taking out their nephews for their 19th birthday and the strippers and all this,” said EE. “I thought it would be nice if DD — because she always said, ‘[EE] what’s a big one like?’ and I said, ‘Well’… so anyway, I arranged it for her to have somebody who was well-endowed, right, so I put them together, she went over and spent the night with him, and I picked her up in the morning.”

“She [DD] hates him, it was awful,” admitted EE.

“He was making me drinks,” recalled DD in a separate interview with Emily Hill, an investigator with the Mass Casualty Commission. “I was sitting there drinking. I remember being nervous because, like, I don’t know this guy, and clearly we’re going to have sex in a minute… I was trying to get more drunk because I didn’t like the situation.”

DD was then in her early 20s. She had recently been divorced. She was trying to attend university, but she had no place to live, so moved in temporarily with EE.

“I was just coming out of a breakup… I was a little, for lack of a better term, fucked up in the head about it,” DD told Hill. “I was trying to do whatever to cover up the pain I was feeling.”

“There’s two times I remember being at his house and having sex with him,” DD continued. “I think the way it works is he always gives you a bath first because he had a bathtub in the bedroom… I distinctly remember him giving me a bath… from what EE had told me, that’s what he did with these girls that he brings back.”

They had sex. “That was not a pleasant experience,” said DD.

Newly released documents explain that DD is EE’s daughter.

Housing disputes

A series of property disputes appears to have added to GW’s unravelling. These will no doubt be further detailed in a document to be released by the commission next week, “The Perpetrator’s Financial Misdealings.”

One of those property disputes was with Kip MacKenzie, and apparently involved property in Fredericton that once belonged to Tom Evans. See “A month before the mass murders, the perpetrator went to Pictou to kill someone else.”

Additionally, GW got in a dispute with his father Paul because Paul had lent him money to buy property in Portapique. After Tom Evans died and GW received an inheritance, GW paid Paul back in full, but Paul’s name was still on the deed. When Paul refused to take his name off the deed, GW threatened to kill him.

However, GW tried essentially the same scheme with his uncle Glynn. Glynn, then living out west, was in declining health, and GW convinced him to buy a property in Portapique. Glynn agreed, but couldn’t finance the purchase until he sold his former home; GW therefore provided a bridge loan to complete the deal. Glynn moved to Portapique, and when his old property sold, he repaid GW. But GW’s name remained on the deed, and he refused to remove it unless Glynn paid him another $70,000.

Another uncle, Neil, intervened, and the matter ended up in court before GW reluctantly removed his name from the deed.

Glynn ultimately sold the property — to Lisa McCully.

Tomorrow: GW’s violence towards Lisa Banfield.

 

 

 

 https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featured/brenda-forbes-tried-to-warn-neighbours-and-the-rcmp-about-the-psychopath-in-portapique-years-before-he-went-on-his-murderous-rampage-no-one-listened/

 

Brenda Forbes tried to warn neighbours and the RCMP about the “psychopath” in Portapique years before he went on his murderous rampage. No one listened.

Hand-written message "Portapique forever in our hearts" written on a placard in the Portapique memorial community church hall in June 2020, surrounded by Nova Scotia flags and flowers. Photo: Joan Baxter

“Portapique forever in our hearts” at Portapique memorial community church hall, June 2020. Photo: Joan Baxter

Some people who lived in Portapique and socialized with GW, the gunman who shot and killed 22 people in Nova Scotia on April 18 and 19, 2020, recall him as a “very nice guy” who was “polite,” “cordial,” “always laughing” and “light-hearted,” if a little “flirtatious” from time to time.

Brenda Forbes is not one of them.

In an interview with the RCMP just days after the tragedy, Forbes — who goes by the nickname Boe— said she knew a “psychopath” when she saw one.

It is the same word she used to describe GW in an interview with the Halifax Examiner in May that year.

Her husband, George Forbes, believes GW was trying to snap up all the property he could in the area, and said he seemed intent on becoming the “King of Portapique.”

He said GW cultivated “minions” in the community, getting people to do odd jobs for him; he would then reward their loyalty with booze and they would all drink together.

“He was happy with that lifestyle,” according to George Forbes. “I call it the Boss Hogg type of guy, and he’s got the little yappy dogs all around.”

Brenda and George Forbes describe a man who was violent with and extremely controlling of his girlfriend, Lisa Banfield, who was too afraid to leave GW for fear of what he would do to her and her family.

This information comes from transcripts of four interviews with Brenda and George Forbes released this week by the Mass Casualty Commission (MCC), which has turned its attention to GW’s violent behaviour towards others, and how he was able to elude police investigation despite a long history of violent and threatening behaviour and illicit activities involving gun smuggling from the United States.

The transcripts are from RCMP interviews with Brenda Forbes on April 22, 2020 and George Forbes on April 23 about their experience over 12 years with GW, another interview with the couple by Sergeant Colin Kuca of the RCMP Serious Crime unit in May 2020, and then an interview with the Forbes by MCC investigators Emily Hill and Paul Thompson in August 2021.

The transcripts paint a terrifying picture of a man who made Brenda, a veteran of Canada’s military, fear for her life, so much so that she and her husband left Portapique, selling their property there in 2015 at a loss of about $100,000.

First they moved to Halifax, but Brenda Forbes was still afraid she might run into GW, as his home and denturist business were in Dartmouth.

So in 2019, the Forbes moved to western Canada.

‘Warning signs’

When Brenda and George Forbes chose a plot of land in Portapique, and then designed and had a log cabin built in 2002, they thought it would be their “forever home.”

After many years in the military (40 for George, 30 for Brenda), which involved a lot of moving about the country and serving overseas, the Forbes were happy to settle in Portapique, close to Five Houses where George had had a cottage before he joined the military, and to Hilden, south of Truro, where his parents lived.

The Forbes moved into their Portapique home in the summer of 2002, and the following year met GW, who came by on a motorcycle with Lisa Banfield on the back, looking for information about the area.

George Forbes told him about a place for sale at 200 Portapique Beach Road, and for a while after GW bought and refurbished the property, the Forbes would join other neighbours at “Gabe’s” for weekend “fire pit” parties.

Portapique Beach Rd sign in the foreground, with an RCMP car parked on the road on April 25 2020. Photo: Joan Baxter

Portapique Beach Rd sign and RCMP car April 25, 2020. Photo: Joan Baxter

However, even then George was seeing “warning signs.”

George told the RCMP that GW was always “probing” about his work as a small arms instructor and advanced reconnaissance instructor for the military, and also asked if George could get him some ammunition.

“No I won’t,” George replied.

When George challenged GW for firing off his gun from his deck while he was drinking, pointing out that bullets could ricochet and it was a residential area, GW dismissed his concerns, saying, “Oh that’s not a big deal. We knew what we were doing.”

George told the RCMP that in 2007 or 2008, GW showed himself and Brenda several illegal weapons, including a “Russian – Eastern European type pistol,” as well as “a shotgun, a 12-guage, and a rifle,” and that none were locked up or secure.

“He pulled the gun out with the magazine still in it,” George said. There was no pistol lock, and GW kept it in a tool drawer in his shed.

When the Forbes asked him where he got the weapons, GW replied, “Oh, I have my connections.”

“We should have reported that right away,” Brenda Forbes said. But at the time, they didn’t think about it because, “we were just saying, ‘it’s Gabe.’”

George described GW as a “wheeler dealer,” a “manipulator” who did a lot of “swindling,” using cash and doing deals “under the table,” a “WIIFM” (What’s-In-It-For-Me?) person.

GW boasted to George that he had made money while a student in New Brunswick by smuggling cigarettes across the U.S. border, and that made George wonder where he was getting his illegal guns.

The Forbes also recall neighbourhood parties when, if GW didn’t feel he was getting enough attention, he would “grab” Banfield by the arm and force her to leave with him.

“She would start … you could see it in her face. She was scared to death of him,” Brenda told the MCC in August 2021.

George said GW drank “way too much,” and occasionally claimed to go “on the wagon,” for a week or a week and a half, before starting again.

All of these things suggested a “pattern,” George Forbes said, and made the Forbes decide to distance themselves from GW.

‘He beat the crap out of her’

Brenda Forbes told the RCMP that from the start she thought GW “was a little off,” and said it didn’t take long for them “to figure him out.”

And it wasn’t long after GW moved in with Lisa Banfield that he “started abusing her.” According to Brenda Forbes, GW:

… beat the crap out of her one day and she ran to my house. I told her that she needed to get help and there were places out there that she could hide from him, he wouldn’t find her. But she told me point blank she was too scared to leave because he would find her and kill her.

Brenda Forbes said GW had used his truck to block Banfield’s car in the driveway so she couldn’t get away.

Speaking to the MCC in 2021, Brenda said that if GW said “jump” Banfield would say “how high?”

“That’s how controlled she was by him. And I feel bad for her, I really do,” Brenda said.

Brenda Forbes later became friends with GW’s uncle, Glynn Wortman, who had moved to Portapique from Edmonton, persuaded to do so by his nephew who advanced the funds for the down payment on the home, and then put his own name on the deed.

She told the RCMP that in 2013, she let Glynn know that GW was cheating on Banfield, bringing “a shitload” of women and girls he picked up in a bar in Truro back to Portapique.

After Glynn told GW about this, GW “dragged” Banfield to Forbes’ house, holding Lisa by the arm, and threatened Brenda, saying, “You’re gonna regret this.”

After that, Brenda said GW would drive up to her house and stare at it for up to a half hour at a time.

“It scared the be-jesus out of me,” Brenda told the RCMP. “We both had FAC’s [weapons permits] and we both had our weapons and stuff … I don’t care, he still scared me.”

The complaint to the RCMP

And then came another incident in 2013, which Brenda Forbes recounted this way to the MCC in August 2021:

Dave Ellison and Richard Ellison and Glynn Wortman, they were out in the back part of the property that Gabriel had … And he had Lisa down on the ground choking her. And the guys, the three guys, they were trying to get Gabriel to stop. And she piped up and said, “Don’t say anything else because it’ll only get worse.” Glynn told me this. So I said, “Oh, my God.” So I … I was at work and I said, “That’s it, I’m calling the RCMP.” So I called the RCMP. I was at the cadet camp in Debert and they came down, there were two of them … And I told them what Glynn had told me. And they said, Well, would he be willing to speak to us?” And I said, “Just give me a second.” …. I called Glynn, I said, “Glynn, would you be willing to tell the RCMP what happened with Lisa and all the illegal weapons and stuff that he has?” He said, “No, because he’s already told me he’s killed somebody in the United States, and if I say anything, he’ll kill me.” And the RCMP heard every word of that.

The MCC Foundational Document on the perpetrator’s violent behaviour towards others, states that, “RCMP records confirm that Forbes contacted the RCMP on July 6, 2013. The officer who took the report, Cst. [Constable] Troy Maxwell, said that the report was not about domestic violence.”

When GW found out she had reported him to the RCMP, he again came to her house, and threatened he would “take” her out. “You’re going to be gone,” Brenda Forbes remembers him saying.

‘I’d be dead now’

In her interview with the Mass Casualty Commission, Brenda Forbes said the RCMP didn’t act on her complaint because they told her they “actually had to have proof” of the allegations about the assault on Lisa Banfield and the illegal weapons.

She explained that there was no way Banfield would come forward, and as for the weapons complaint, “What am I going to do, take pictures of it?” she said. “So basically they [the RCMP] let it go.”

During the Forbes’ May 2020 interview with the RCMP Serious Crimes unit, Sergeant Colin Kuca asked them if the police had ever followed up on Brenda Forbes’ complaint about GW’s assault on Banfield and the illegal weapons. This is part of the exchange that followed:

Brenda Forbes: Nope, not at all.

Colin Kuca: And you certainly didn’t get any call back from the police officers themselves, saying, “Hey, this is what we did.”

Brenda Forbes: No.

Colin Kuca: But what they did tell you if I understand correctly is, they provided you somewhat of a reason why they couldn’t really do anything about your suggestions that he had guns.

Brenda Forbes: Yeah, yeah.

Colin Kuca:…and they kind of suggested to you they might not be able to do much with the assault thing.

Brenda Forbes: Yeah, she’s [Banfield’s] not gonna say anything … and they actually said they were going to monitor him [GW].”

Colin Kuca: Right. OK. Whatever that means. OK. … so if I were to ask you …where Gabriel or Lisa [sic] spoken directly to by the RCMP following your complaint, do you have any idea?

Brenda Forbes: No. Not at all.

Colin Kuca:… if the RCMP had spoken to Gabriel …

Brenda Forbes [interrupting]: I’d be dead now … I would not be here … unless I had enough time to get (makes a gun noise).

‘They wouldn’t say boo’

Brenda Forbes told the RCMP that she warned everyone in Portapique about GW, but they ignored her. “He was feeding them all booze,” she said.

“So they wouldn’t say boo,” George added.

Brenda Forbes said most of them just “slammed” her, saying “that’s all garbage.”

In her interview with the MCC in 2021, Brenda Forbes said people would say to her, “No, he’s such a nice guy. He’s doing all this for us and everything. You don’t know what you’re talking about.”

Brenda said she was ostracized for speaking out.

In 2014, Brenda decided she had to get out of Portapique. Her husband was absent on months-long missions in Africa, and she was alone in the house, often hiding her vehicle so that GW would not know when she was home.

A "Nova Scotia Strong" banner on the front of the Portapique memorial church hall in June 2020. Photo: Joan Baxter

Portapique memorial community church hall in June 2020. Photo: Joan Baxter

Not a ‘forever home’ after all

“So we sold our home,” Brenda told the MCC:

And that hurts me, not because we sold the house, but I should have warned the people that bought it what he [GW] was like when they came here from New Mexico. When they came, I introduced them to the good people that were there, but I did not tell them about Gabriel. And I should have because he, when I went to sell the house I made it the codicil that if he wants to buy it, no way. And that pissed him off. He wanted the house.

Forbes told the RCMP that the reason GW killed the people who bought her house, and then burned it down, was not because of them, but because she refused to sell it to him.

“He took the houses down because of people that pissed him off,” Forbes said.

“It breaks my heart.”

When the MCC asked her in 2021 what she hoped could come out of this tragedy, Brenda replied that she would like to see “more support for women that are abused.”

“Abused or in a situation they can’t get out of,” George added.

Brenda told the MCC she believes there is a need for new laws as well:

When I reported that he had weapons and all that stuff, a new law should come out somehow that if a person reports something like that, they have to go and investigate, not just say, “Oh, we can’t do that.” Like … when I said she was being beaten and stuff, “Well, she has to come here.” No, if I told you, you go check it out, that’s the way it should be.”

 

https://globalnews.ca/news/6967657/shooting-domestic-violence/

She witnessed the N.S. mass shooter’s violence. She’s still struggling to be heard

Brenda Forbes, 62, wanted proof.

So the other day, Forbes balanced her iPad on her lap, set it to start recording, and called Glynn Wortman on the Messenger app from her phone.

“Hi,” Wortman can be heard saying. His voice is slightly muffled and the screen is dark, the iPad having slipped and fallen against Forbes’ body while they spoke.

“How’s it going?” she asked back.

Click to play video: 'Multiple witnesses to Nova Scotia shooter’s violent past'Multiple witnesses to Nova Scotia shooter’s violent past
Multiple witnesses to Nova Scotia shooter’s violent past – May 22, 2020

READ MORE: A detailed timeline of how the rampage unfolded

 

Wortman and Forbes met in Nova Scotia around 2007, friends through cadets but tied together now by Wortman’s nephew, who killed 22 people last month in the worst mass murder in modern Canadian history.

The rampage started in Portapique, a community of about 100 people 40 kilometres west of Truro, N.S., where the gunman was — for about a decade  — Forbes’ neighbour and, for a time, locked in a property dispute with his uncle Wortman.

Global News has verified the audio with Wortman, who said he witnessed his nephew abuse his partner repeatedly.

Forbes, who says she finally left the community in 2014 with her husband because of the gunman, called Wortman because she wanted proof. It felt necessary, she says, after the RCMP told Global News it had “not found a record” of Forbes reporting the gunman to them in 2013 for domestic violence and a cache of weapons.

Their response worried her.

“I don’t want people not to believe me,” she told Global News. “I tell the truth.”

Click to play video: 'New photos provide look at Nova Scotia gunman’s home'New photos provide look at Nova Scotia gunman’s home
New photos provide look at Nova Scotia gunman’s home – May 12, 2020

Forbes worried about finding herself in a scenario where nobody else spoke up about the gunman’s history and then finding that turned back on her somehow; she imagined people saying, you’re lying.

 

Click to play video: 'RCMP say no evidence of “hatred towards women” in Nova Scotia mass shooting'
Click to play video: 'Meet the woman who tried to stop N.S. killer’s abuse years ago'

Click to play video: 'N.S. shooting victim remembered as loving mother and teacher'

Click to play video: 'École Polytechnique massacre: Why we remember 30 years later'



David Amos


David Amos
Underestimate at your peril
NovaScotiaFreckles
Joanne Willoughby
💕
Snippy Pinky
James Geddes
1
Joanne Willoughby
Is anyone else going to Halifax on Friday? I’m registered but was wondering if anyone else will be there too, I feel like we should have LGC’s buttons to wear lol
God bless you for standing with families in Halifax, Joanne!!!❤🙏
Center Hice
Great 👍 video 👍 Little Grey Cells 👌, I ld have to say there s too much that doesn't add up with Lisa ,and whomever else was involved in this ,cause I don't think he did it on his own . Too much of he info doesn't add up .
nikki lewis
My question what if any relationship does she have with RCMP, HRP, CBSA
Janes Blond
How did her slippers end up in Debert?
1
Wildstar Productions
It has been suggested that Wortman tossed them out of his PC Replica. Why would he do that? Not sure. He had loaded up the car with so much stuff: duty belts, RCMP pants and boots, Guns, Ammo, gas cans, etc. And then he ditched a lot of it in Debert behind the Welding company. Had she been wearing them that night? It is unknown. We know that her shoes were found on Portapique Beach Road and that she claims to have been dragged to the Warehouse through the woods. Dragged barefoot through gasoline, gravel, shrubs, and finally, she ended up hiding in a tree's root system on an extremely cold night for many hours. Some of this story doesn't add up. Maybe the slippers are a red herring. Or maybe not. It'll be interesting to see if more comes out about this when she testifies.
1
Linda M
The replay seems to be missing stuff. lol
1
Like the beginning tech issue with mic or other things are missing?
Linda M
It was a large portion of the live chat missing.

 

https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/posts/leon-joudrey-has-been-open-and-consistent-about-what-took-place-on-the-morning-o/270855044560295/ 

 

February 16, 2021

 
Leon Joudrey has been open and consistent about what took place on the morning of April 19. He says he gave Lisa Banfield his sneakers and a jacket when she left his house with the police. The RCMP returned the jacket soon afterward and the shoes months later, leaving them at his door.
Joudrey has agreed to be interviewed by anyone who called. He’s that kind of guy. He looks you straight in the eye and lets her rip. His story is clear and concise. Over the past 10 months, Joudrey has been quoted often about what happened, but in every instance except here, media has refused to report that he didn’t buy into Banfield’s story.
The latest was Global TV’s ongoing podcast 13 HOURS. It appears that the show, hosted by Sarah Ritchie, has bought into the earliest narratives by the RCMP and the government that the main issue in this matter is domestic violence. That being the case anything contrary to that thesis is viewed with disdain.
In a recent episode Ritchie interviewed Joudrey and, once again, his version of events regarding Banfield didn’t make it to air.
A number of viewers on social media directly questioned Global about it.
One person contacted Global and recounted their conversation with news director Rhonda Brown in a post that was recently deleted from the television station's Instagram account.
In answer to the question, “How in the name of God did SHE (Sarah Ritchie) leave out the full testimony of Leon Joudrey?” Brown was quoted as saying:
“I can tell you this …conversation about the Leon Joudrey testimony went to the highest levels of Global News. We were advised that parts of his testimony may not be verified. And the police had a different account.”
After all the RCMP has done, Global is concerned about their story dovetailing with the police story. What is this, Communist China?
Via email, Frank extended Brown an opportunity to speak to this, but received no reply before press time...
A deal with the devil, by Paul Palango
(for subscribers only)

74 Comments

Florence Lane
WHAT A HAPPY LOOKING COUPLE.
FRANK YOU COULDN'T HAVE PICKED A BETTER PHOTO TO POST WITH YOUR STORY
MIGHT I ADD
WHO ARE YOU TRYING TO KID
HARD TO BELIEVE ANYTHING THAT COMES OUT OF HER MOUTH ALONG WITH LEON'S
6

The comment Florence Lane is replying to has been deleted.
Florence Lane
Sheri Syms no disrespect to you none
Sorry you took this as rude it's definitely not meant to be.
I have read everything from day one of this terrible tragedy
I have chosen not to say anything for months
I have lost a niece and nephew
My grandsons lost their grandmother
It is beyond disrespect that families friends have dealt with this kind of bullshit
You have yourself a great day Sheri
2
Maureen Ralph
Sheri Syms Just out of curiosity, was it known about the relationship between Joudrey and this so called maiden???? Are you from the area? a one of your loved ones murdered by this monster..if not then Shut Up with your meaningless comments!!!!
4

Tammy Marsters
If one survivor, dressed for the weather, hid in the woods for less time and had hypothermia how did she not? This is why I have never believed her story.
15

Susan Killam
Tammy Marsters Exactly, he had no skin in this game. What would have been a motive for lying about the details. He wouldn't have benefited from lying about anything that happened that night. Lisa Banfield, on the other hand, could have a number of motives for not telling the truth, not the least of which is that she doesn't look good in an orange suit.
5
Wendy Jean
Tammy Marsters with no shoes on! I think her slippers were in his car
2

Robin Leslie Armitage
Wendy Jean or pants or coat !! But, she had her phone, which she never used to warn anyone !!
Wendy Jean
Ohhh didn't know that

Colleen Wilkinson
If after all the running around she did barefoot- and especially in the woods she should have some sort of injuries on her feet. We’re there any?
7
Lana Theresa
Colleen Martin and kicked a window out of the replica cop car to escape with nothing on her feet.
5
Colleen Wilkinson
Lana Theresa right. I forgot about that!
- didn’t she also have one handcuff on? What happened to that? IF. She removed it herself there would have to be bruising or at least red marks IMO
2
Lana Theresa
Her stories don't add up at all.
3
Top fan
Barbara Amero
Colleen Martin Bruises can take minutes or days to appear. If the handcuff was loose, too big there likely wouldn’t be any bruising or red mark after sliding it off. It would be fairly easy to slide off, especially if her hand was smaller than her wrist. Dave Young says it has been proven time and time again that handcuffs are not a one size fits all type of restraints. He believes there are a moderate percent and maybe more of the general population that standard size handcuffs do not fit. They are either too small or in some cases too big. (Young has over 25 years of combined civilian and military law enforcement and training experience.)
Darren Robicheau
I wonder if her hands were ever tested for gun shot residue?
2
Colleen Wilkinson
Darren Robicheau I wonder if he had a toxology report?
2
Darren Robicheau
I'd also like to see the report on which rounds were found in officer Stevenson. I have a hard time believing Wortman was anywhere near shubie when that took place.
Colleen Wilkinson
Darren Robicheau We know he ended up in Enfield
Darren Robicheau
According to the video at the Enfield weigh scale with the time stamp on it. He can't be there and shubie at the same time.
Lana Theresa
Darren Robicheau lets hope so but probably not.
Lana Theresa
Darren Robicheau I agree. In first footage that was recorded by onlookers..no cop cars at that scene were even on fire.
Darren Robicheau
Yes and I have yet to see a picture from shubie that shows either police car with a push bar on it.
Lana Theresa
Darren Robicheau exactly different time frame.
Darren Robicheau
If GW police car had a push bar and neither on of the cars in shubie had one who was driving the other car? Seems there is more questions than answers.
Lana Theresa
Darren Robicheau none of the pics that were on social media even make any sense...the cop cars look like they were in 2 different spots also.
3
Top fan
Barbara Amero
Darren Robicheau What next? Pregnancy test?
Darren Robicheau
Barbara Amero not every stupid thought needs to be typed in the comments.
Lana Theresa
Barbara Amero ya because that makes sense...give your head a shake.

Lana Theresa
Original pictures don't lie...look at them closely!

Alex MacLean
I don't believe this woman's story for a second. And what's been going on with this case has been despicable. The government, media, and RCMP should all be ashamed. Recently, there have been family members of these victims kicked out of a Facebook group about the mass shooting because they dared question Banfield's story.
27
Linda Phillips
Alex MacLean Nova Scotia government gives $5 million to Sandpiper Ventures....Sarah Young is one of the woman-led venture capitalist. She is managing partner, responsible for Atlantic Canada Public Relations. She is the communications director for the Joint Public Inquiry in the mass murders. The public inquiry is charged to investigate (among many other things) the role the government of Nova Scotia played before and after the murders, the policy short comings, and the tangled relationship between the Provincial Department of Justice (including Minister Mark Furey) and the RCMP. And just as the inquiry begins its work, the provincial government gives $5 million to an organization controlled in part by the inquiry's communications director. Tim Bousquet, Halifax Examiner
4
John DeEll
Alex MacLean I too was kicked out of that same group back in the summer simply because I questioned the "battered woman" explanation!
Top fan
Barbara Amero
Alex MacLean But how did they question ”Banfield’s story”? Like Palango does with public ridicule, degradation? As for her story, how do you know what it is? She has not spoken publicly. What’s in unredacted court documents is police summary of what they say she told them, not actual transcripts of what she told them.

Maria Hagen
in most domestic abuse cases.. is it not the partner that generally found dead vs a mass killing spree of unrelated persons? yup, this stinks & has from the beginning.
9
Darren Robicheau
Didn't leon say that he found the jacket he gave to Lisa on the ground? Wonder if that was the so called jacket Lisa said she left by the woods so that the police would find it?

Laura Norman
Darren Robicheau his full story is here and what I gather is that it was the jacket he lent her by a pole and he asked if he could retrieve it and they let him.
Leon Joudrey: in his own words
YOUTUBE.COM
Leon Joudrey: in his own words
Leon Joudrey: in his own words
3
Darren Robicheau
Yes I have watched this and other interviews with Leon. What a mess the rcmp have created.
2
Laura Norman
Darren Robicheau seems so odd how he has been put aside in this.
Darren Robicheau
Laura Norman i would say its because Leon's story destroys the rcmp story of what happened.
10
Tom Page
Global News is Global Fiction
Janie Andrews
Darren Robicheau she was wearing Leon’s jacket when the RCMP came to his house. Leon stated that in his interviews.
3
Sheri Syms
Darren Robicheau yes he did. Outside next to a pole at the top of the PB Road
Glenn Hughes
yes it doesn’t add up, her story is too hard to believe! If she did not spend the night in the woods , Where was she???

Terri Gale
Glenn Hughes i think she was with GW all night, and the slippers they found were hers. I think she went back to get the cash and couldn't get it. Then went to Leon's.
7
Darren Robicheau
She was definitely somewhere other than where she said she was. My only question is if she was with GW all night how did she make it back to Leon's house without being seen by rcmp?
2
Wendy Jean
Terri Gale where was the cash?
Wendy Jean
Darren Robicheau she might have been with the rcmp
Glenn Hughes
She was somewhere , but not in the woods all night!
Terri Gale
Wendy Jean buried on his property is what a read.
Terri Gale
Darren Robicheau not sure, but I believe there is still a white Ford truck not accounted for.
Arlene MacDonald
The two of them make me sick .
2
Carrie Lynn Burke
I don’t believe her for a second
Ed Bowers
If she was innocent she would be dead. It's just that simple.
3
Katherine Ann
I want to read or hear Leon’s account. Is there anywhere a regular person could this?

Jennifer Sampson
You could start by looking up little grey cells on you tube. He's wonderful
2
13 deadly hours: The Nova Scotia mass shooting - The Fifth Estate
YOUTUBE.COM
13 deadly hours: The Nova Scotia mass shooting - The Fifth Estate
13 deadly hours: The Nova Scotia mass shooting - The Fifth Estate
2
Katherine Ann
Michelle Thank you. I will listen after work today. Thanks again.
Leon Joudrey: in his own words
YOUTUBE.COM
Leon Joudrey: in his own words
Leon Joudrey: in his own words
3
Darren Robicheau
I think 13 hours has some missing stuff.
Top fan
Barbara Amero
Darren Robicheau As I recall, !3 hours missed reporting that Leon Joudrey said he witnessed Wortman verbally abuse Banfield. I‘ve never seen anyone mention that. Certainly not Palango. Well that wouldn’t fit his narrative.
Darren Robicheau
Barbara Amero what narrative it that?
Top fan
Barbara Amero 
Darren Robicheau What narrative is it that you said you see me trying to push? Not trying to push any narrative; just commenting on others comments. I have no proof that she was abused. But I have no reason to believe that others (5 or more) lied when reporting publicly (not anonymously) to the media that they witnessed Wortman physically, verbally and otherwise abuse his long-time common-law spouse. So I believe them.
As for you saying it’s hearsay from a few people, I think it’s more than a few in terms of coming forward publicly (not anonymously); more than needed to corroborate what’s in unredacted court documents. If they report such under oath in court (or public inquiry), it would be eyewitness testimony, not hearsay. Perhaps they will be subpoenaed.
Considering all that’s been said about Wortman being a controlling, threatening, abusive, violent, dangerous man who pled guilty to physically assaulting a 15-year-old boy, I’d say there’s a very high probability that he physically, verbally and otherwise abused Banfield.
Paul Palango, Is A Nova Scotian.
ZONE6MEDIA.COM
Paul Palango, Is A Nova Scotian.
Paul Palango, Is A Nova Scotian.
Dane Hanson
Surprise surprise
Zacc Monaghan
  
The comment Maureen Ralph is replying to has been deleted.

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AO3WCEeBfrY&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells 

 

Leon Joudrey: in his own words

9,352 views
Premiered Oct 11, 2020
3.41K subscribers

 

 https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/why-i-didn-t-get-killed-survivor-of-n-s-mass-shooting-struggles-in-year-from-hell-1.5392372

 

'Why I didn't get killed?': Survivor of N.S. mass shooting struggles in 'year from hell'

Natasha Pace 2020

Natasha PaceCTV News Atlantic Reporter

@NatashaPaceContact

Published Sunday, April 18, 2021 6:45PM ADT

 

 
Leon Joudrey"Why I didn't get killed that night, it's hard to deal with when all my friends and neighbours did, and to wake up to the aftermath was just horrific," said Leon Joudrey, who hasn't been able to live in Portapique, N.S., since the tragedy.

HALIFAX -- To say the last year has been difficult for Leon Joudrey would be an understatement.

"It's been a year, a year from hell," he said.

For two years, Joudrey called the picturesque community of Portapique, N.S., home. But these days, he can't bring himself to live there.

"It's hard going back in there because you see all the burnt foundation of one of my neighbours and the memorial signs and it's a hard thing," said Joudrey. "Your home should be your comfort and it's not comfortable."

Joudrey was home on Saturday, April 18, 2020, the night a lone gunman went on a murderous rampage that started in Portapique and ended nearly 100 kilometers away in Enfield, N.S., the following day.

The shooter's common law spouse came to Joudrey's house that Sunday looking for help.

"Why I didn't get killed that night, it's hard to deal with when all my friends and neighbours did, and to wake up to the aftermath was just horrific," he said.

"I spent time with the Blairs and the Tucks, and Frank and Dawn, they were my neighbours, and Peter and Joy, they lived down the end of the road -- and Lisa McCully of course. So yeah, basically over half the people I knew got killed."

TRAGEDY AFFECTING WHOLE COMMUNITY

The last year has been challenging for many in Portapique and the surrounding communities.

"There is fear, there is anxiety, there is distrust," said Josh Fillmore, associate pastor of the Faith Baptist Church in nearby Great Village, N.S.

"In our church and in our community there are people who are not going too far from home these days. Not doing their daily walk on the shoulder of the road out of fear. But the bigger concern is for the people who are not connected. We believe there's a lot of suffering in silence behind closed doors."

Social worker Serena Lewis says the way each person deals with grief is unique and that this tragedy requires a complex approach and long-term planning.

"I really think that this time last year the world responded to us when we were brought to our knees," said Lewis.

"Some people have told me post-causality events across the globe that we could be looking at a 20-year process of healing, so it's important that we look at all of the different services we have but do we need unique services for something like this," she said.

SEARCHING FOR ANSWERS

Tom Taggart, the councillor for the area, says the only way the community will heal is when they finally get answers about what happened.

"Until that happens, there will never be an end to this, the hurt the pain and all that kind of stuff," said Taggart.

Joudrey agrees.

"As far as the process, the inquiry goes, I think everybody would agree with me that it's taken too long and families have been suffering and they want closure, answers," said Joudrey. "We're not getting the answers, we're not getting the closure and to go through this again for another year and then see where we stand, I hope we're further ahead than we are now."

While he waits for answers, Joudrey is trying to move forward the best he can.

"I do love the outdoors and I got two dogs that love it too, so that keeps me going," he said. "I never thought I'd find myself in this position, but what you go through is 'why not me?' Why you know that's part of it. What could you did to stop it. Yeah, it just plays on your mind 24-7."

 

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/lisa-banfield-mass-casualty-commission-testify-1.6506926

 

Relatives of N.S. mass shooting victims say their lawyers should be allowed to question gunman's spouse

Lisa Banfield will give evidence on July 15

The spouse of the gunman in the Nova Scotia mass shooting will testify mid-July before a public inquiry, but she won't face direct questions from lawyers representing victims' families.

The Mass Casualty Commission said Thursday in a news release that due to Lisa Banfield's status as a "survivor of the perpetrator's violence" and "in light of information she has already provided," only the inquiry's lawyer will be asking her questions during her July 15 appearance.

The decision drew criticism from lawyers representing families, who said it was the latest example of restrictions on their ability to pose questions directly to witnesses on their clients' behalf.

Josh Bryson, a lawyer for the family of victims Peter and Joy Bond, says his clients are losing faith in the credibility of the inquiry.

"Cross-examination can make or break a witness's evidence. You test the evidence in a meaningful and trauma-informed way," he said in an interview Thursday.

Michael Scott, a lawyer for a firm representing 14 of the families, said in an email that his clients were "deeply discouraged" by the commissioners' decision to "deny our clients a meaningful opportunity to question Lisa Banfield."

"Our clients are not confident that commission counsel will elicit all relevant evidence from Ms. Banfield," Scott wrote.

"Today's decision has significantly undermined the legitimacy of the process and our clients' confidence in the commissioners' independence."

Banfield, on the advice of her lawyers, had initially refused to speak under oath at the hearings into the 22 killings carried out by her spouse on April 18-19, 2020. However, she changed her position after a criminal charge laid against her for supplying ammunition to the killer was referred to restorative justice.

The inquiry has also refused to allow cross-examination of Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill and Staff Sgt. Andy O'Brien, who were the first RCMP managers overseeing the response to the shootings. That decision resulted in a boycott of some proceedings by lawyers representing some of the families.

Emily Hill, senior commission counsel, says participating lawyers can submit their questions in advance and can provide followup questions to the inquiry's lawyer to ask during the single day set aside to hear Banfield. She noted that Banfield has provided five unsworn interviews as well as documents that the public will be able to view.

However, Bryson said the inquiry's interviews are unsworn testimony, adding that it is crucial to have an opportunity for family lawyers to test prior statements by asking questions to a witness under oath.

Banfield's evidence could provide further information about the killer's personal history and state of mind and may also be key to the commission's mandate to examine the role of gender-based and intimate-partner violence in the killer's actions.

The inquiry has heard she was the last person with the gunman before he went on his rampage. The killer assaulted her and confined her in a car, but she managed to escape. She fled into the woods and hid before emerging the next morning and telling police the killer was driving a replica RCMP vehicle.

The RCMP have said from the outset that Banfield wasn't aware of her spouse's intentions when she provided him with ammunition prior to the shootings, but they proceeded with charges alleging she, her brother and her brother-in-law had illegally transferred ammunition to the killer.

During a briefing Thursday morning, the commission confirmed that senior RCMP officers, including Supt. Darren Campbell, Chief Supt. Chris Leather, assistant commissioner Lee Bergerman and Commissioner Brenda Lucki, will testify in July and August — under oath and subject to cross-examination.

Premier Tim Houston told reporters on Thursday he was aware of the decision not to permit cross-examination in Banfield's case and that he understood the families' concerns about the process. However, he didn't directly criticize the inquiry as he had done on the first day of its proceedings.

"I remain confident that at the end of this there will be recommendations and information that Nova Scotians can rely on," he said.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 07:24:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Leger, Louis (PO/CPM)"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 07:24:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Merci pour votre courriel.  Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 14
juillet 2022.  SVP contacter Laura Peasey au Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca ou au
506-230-1364 pour l’assistance.

Thank you for your email.  I will be out of the office until July 14,
2022.  Please contact Laura Peasey at Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca or at
506-230-1364 for assistance.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 04:23:57 -0300
Subject: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was that he would not
waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday No doubt a host of
other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: THopper@postmedia.com, "jagmeet.singh"<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca, "pierre.poilievre"
<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, jennifer@halifaxexaminer.ca,
paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Tom.Taggartmla@gmail.com,
darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca, bmassey@justice.gc.ca, "Amato, Mike #509"
<509@yrp.ca>, brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "michelle.rempel"
<michelle.rempel@parl.gc.ca>, kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca,
Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>, akennedy@quispamsis.ca,
"elizabeth.mcmillan"<elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca>, Justice Minister
<JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, PREMIER@novascotia.ca, andrewjdouglas
<andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca,
NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, tim
<tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis"
<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca
 
 
 

Thursday, 30 June 2022

How the N.S. mass shooter controlled, exploited women around him

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ottjrgpjGRY&ab_channel=NighttimePodcast

 

Video unavailable
This video is now private 
 
 
Methinks Palango's "Bad Boy" played him like fiddle N'esy Pas?

 

 ***Editor's note: The audio clip that forms the basis of this story is a fraud. Purported by Rob Doucette to be a clip of police questioning his friend Gabriel Wortman in the murder of Kevin James Petrie, it was lifted from an old episode of CSI. Frank (obviously!-ed.) regrets the error.***

 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 10, 2022 - with Paul Palango

296 watching now
Started streaming 28 minutes ago
7.45K subscribers
Paul Palango and I will discuss the unfolding public inquiry into the Nova Scotia Mass Shootings. Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice memo at nighttimepodcast.com/contact

 

https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova-scotia-rampage 

 

 https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/episodes/nova-scotia-mass-shooting-220703

 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 3, 2022 - Weekly Updates - with Paul Palango

Nova Scotia, April 18-19, 2020

Over a period of thirteen hours 51 year old denturist Gabriel Wortman, dressed as a police officer and driving a replica police car, carried out Canada’s most deadly act of mass murder. In this ongoing series Nighttime will explore the many elements of this tragic story. What happened, why it happened, and what could have been done to stop him.

In this episode Paul Palango and I recap the past weeks developments, respond to listener voice memos, and share some details of upcoming work we will be sharing.

 


---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 04:42:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Palango While you and your RCMP buddies
are still playng dumb Perhaps The Mob Reporter and I should talk EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<

mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Pineo, Robert"<RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 04:41:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Hey Palango While you and
your RCMP buddies are still playng dumb Perhaps The Mob Reporter and I
should talk EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.  Please note that I will be out of the
office during the week of July 11-15, 2022 attending Court and the
Public Inquiry.  I will be checking my messages and will try to
respond within 24 hours.

If you matter is urgent, please email Cassandra Billard at
cbillard@pattersonlaw.ca.

I apologize for any inconvenience.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "McCulloch, Sandra"<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 04:41:37 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Hey Palango While you and
your RCMP buddies are still playng dumb Perhaps The Mob Reporter and I
should talk EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be unavailable the week of July 11th, preparing for and
attending the Mass Casualty Commission. I will be accessing email only
periodically, as time permits, and will attend to your message at the
earliest opportunity. If you require an urgent response, please
contact Theresa Kaye at tkaye@pattersonlaw.ca or (902) 897-2000.

 

---------- Original message ----------
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 01:41:19 -0300
Subject: Hey Palango While you and your RCMP buddies are still playng
dumb Perhaps The Mob Reporter and I should talk EH?
To: mobreporter@gmail.com, "Brenda.Lucki"
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, NightTimePodcast

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1HdiQ-G2j8&ab_channel=TheMobReporter 

 

Prison visit with former Quebec Hells Angels boss Maurice "Mom" Boucher

80,485 views
Jun 6, 2018
438K subscribers
NEW: JOIN ME ON PATREON: https://www.patreon.com/TheMobReporter 
 
Here is a portion of former Hells Angels Motorcycle Club boss Maurice "Mom" Boucher talking to his daughter, during her visit to see him behind bars, on July 11, 2015. It was presented in court as a formal exhibit to support charges against him and ordered released. They were talking in French. En français. 
 
 
The Mob Reporter is a professional journalist bringing you real-life mob, police and true crime news and educational videos. ~ 
Please subscribe to my other channels: 
 
To read my news exposés and journalism in the National Post, visit: http://news.nationalpost.com/author/a...
 
For more information, visit http://www.adrianhumphreys.com
 
Please like, share, comment and subscribe. Thanks for watching! - 
The Mob Reporter 
-~-~~-~~~-~~-~- 
 
Please watch: "History seen through police photos": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jycNI...-~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
Kollin011
He’s communicating secretly with sign language. Canadian bikers are more like a mafia.
 
 
 
Lew Scagnetti
The guy looks to be in good shape like he's working out ! Also, I was not aware that Max. security prisons let you wear a watch !! Knowing Mom Boucher it's probably a Rolex !

Extr eme
you obviously don't know him
 
Lew Scagnetti
 @Extr eme  Nor do I want To !@!!
 
Regular Guy
He's not in that great of shape. He has throat cancer.
 
David Amos
 @Regular Guy  He is history now
 
 
 
 
 
trad duction
My personal translation which may contain mistakes : His daughter starts by gesturing on her forehead meaning, that he has to think and take a guess, she is trying to have him guessing a name, so he tried by stating 3 names. First he says "C'est Renee Levesques ?" She answers "Non L'autre" ( which means no the other ). To that he answers some name like " Remy Talbote". And she says "Non non l'affaire que tu..." ( which means No the business that you...) and she whispers the rest through silent lipsing which looks like she's saying "RIZZ""RIZZ" which could stand for Rizzuto. And then she says "Pas lui" ( meaning Not him ). Then he laughs and guessed it " C'est l'affaire de Mafia la, Raynald Des! ( which means The Mafria affair, Raynald Des! ) and he stops there because he was going to say Raynald Desjardins but you'll notice that his daughter says "OKAY" meaning cmon dont start saying full names here. And he switches it by saying "DesBandes" to lure the security guards who might have heard him and then she says "Hein?" which is equivalent to "Huh?" because she still doesn't feel comfortable with his bad choice of code-words and he switches again saying "Des Banques" and she repeats "DesBanques" and she laughs, then he laughs and says "Pas Raymond" which is another code meaning Not Raymond, which ultimately means Yes Raynald. Then it gets to all kinds of codes which very much clearly plots to murder. So at 0:37 she asks " mais tu pense que peut-etre ?" meaning do you think perhaps? and he answers " d'apres moi il va venir" ( meaning i suppose he will meet up ) and he makes the hand gestures/sign of cut throat or strangling. Then at 0:47 he says " si il vient !" meaning if he shows up! . And then she asks "oui mais lui en quoi que lui?" meaning in which reasons would he. And then she stops and says "pas de mes affaires" meaning none of my business. And she follows by saying "c'est ma curiosité" (meaning sorry im just curious ) to which he answers something very important "on en parlera après" ( he says "après" in a whispering voice ) which all means "we'll talk about it AFTER" as he multi-hits his chest with both hands/fingers which seems to implied bullets&chest as they are both laughing and he overlooks the back door window to verify if any security caught that one because that was quite a lot and not very discrete. Then it seems like he wants her to play an actrice role and create an act with the Mafia as if she is willing to go against her father as he says "Parceque je préfere que toi, tu sois capable de dire que t'es contre moi, que contre les autres" Lots of whispers there again after that but what he clearly says is "I prefer that you enable yourself to say that you're against me, rather than you being against TheOthers". And he continue saying Trust me you'll see that it's better and she laughs saying "yeah but..." ( they both laugh) Then at 1:12 she smartly replies "Non mais parceque lui il peut ne pas aimer que..." and she whispers " que je m'engage" which all means "Yes but no because him he might not like that... I bring myself in". To which he answers That's why I'm telling you I know someone whom. "C'est pour ca que je te dis que je connais quelqun qui" and he gestures at 1:19 some kind of gesture which seems to mean delegate or replacement. To which she happily says "Ok" and he says "je te demandais ca en passant" meaning I was just asking you while we're at it" and she's happy to retort at 1:28"Puis rendu la je sais plus rien" meaning "ok so from that point I shall not know anything further". He answers "C'est ca tu fais juste me dire Oui ou Non c'est tout la" which means "That's right you just let me know Yes or No and that all". Then from 1:34 they are referring to the person to whom she will delegate the task to when she says in code words again "Non mais moi je sais pas comment lui il reagit a quoi" which means " No but I dont know how one will react to what" Then it gets serious when he says "je ne sais pas si c'est son # ou pas" meaning "i dont know if it will be his # or not" which is a code sentence to say "i dont know if he will do the job himself or will delegate as well".Then she laughs out of surprise and at 1:46 he says "parceque lui il va te dire ah peu etre, tu sais" ( because him, you know, he would tell you ah maybe") meaning that this one might even tell you maybe I know someone else whom can do the job, and he says "lui aussi il va te répondre je connais quelqun ok Oui" ( him too he might say I know somebody ok yes ). At 1:57"Je connais peut-etre qulequn interessé" ( i might know someone interested ) and she answers "si ça t'intéresse" ( if that interests you ) and laughs at the fact that this job will probably go through many delegations for that one assignment / murder. And then a very important Rule is covered in the next exchange. The rule of Untouchable. As he says at 2:00"mais laisse moi le temps d'y parler parceque lui il pourra pas! " which translates to "at this point i'll need the time to talk to him because he wont be able to!" which is the Rule of not being able to kill a high profile gangster which they call a Made Man or an Untouchable unless a Boss like Boucher gave the direct authorization... as you can tell I watch a lot of movies and documentaries. Then let's jump to 2:10 where she says "mais peut-etre qu'il m'a donneront pas non plus" meaning "but maybe they might not allow me neither". And she continues saying "il va faire ok laisse moi checker ca" meaning "he might say to me ok let me looking into it". Which is coded again to say "what if they dont let me go through with that task of delegation and they just answer me Ok let me look into it". Then he says at 2:17"il est obilgé" meaning "they can't refuse". Then she says something fishy which seems as if the fact is she doesn't want to go through with this assignment and as if she tried to prepare her father for a non-success as she now says at 2:20"mais au moins ca va etre passé" meaning "well at least I would have passed the message" and THEN you'll notice the calm fire in him at 2:23 as he stops and stairs at her with heavy breathing which I hope your speakers can capture and finally after a four seconds of heavy breathing and silence he says "parceque moi ca me laisse indiférent ca et je le connais bien moi" meaning "all you just said here leaves uninterested because I know him well me". And then at 2:35 he does the cut-throat gesture again saying "so many things happened that I dont care anymore" ( il m'est arrivé tellement d'affaires que ca me fait boff ) and she answers with a fake smile "tu t'en christ" which means "you dont give a christ fck anymore" and he stairs at her straight in the eyes saying "n'importe qui, toute mes supposés" which means "i dont care about anybody and all of my supposedly" ( all my supposedly soldiers, allies, friends, family members ) and he stairs at her silently breathing hard and sadly she gets the message. And he looks at his watch and excuses himself and she fakes laughs and fake jokes and rest is history. - Rudy
 
Wow, well done. Thank you! 

trad duction
 @The Mob Reporter  Pleasure! Too bad I was two years late to view that great vid. Thanks to you too for sharing this very very interesting upload!
 
David Amos
 @The Mob Reporter  Perhaps we should talk

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aa-iMfjnXYk 

 


Maurice « Mom » Boucher meurt à 69 ans

20,804 views
Jul 10, 2022
 512K subscribers
L'ancien membre influent des Hells Angels Maurice Boucher, mieux connu sous le surnom de « Mom », est mort dimanche (10 juillet 2022) à l'âge de 69 ans d'un cancer de la gorge. Le récit de Marie-Josée Paquette Comeau Notre article sur le sujet : http://rc.ca/STgWfV

 

 

 https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/mom-boucher-to-serve-10-years-for-plot-to-kill-montreal-mafia-figure

 

'Mom' Boucher gets new 10-year sentence, daughter to serve house arrest

"All is good," said Boucher before the sentencing. The former Hells Angel is already serving three life sentences related to the murders of two prison guards and the attempted murder of another.

Maurice (Mom) Boucher was sentenced to a 10-year prison term on Friday for his leading role in a plot to murder Raynald Desjardins, an influential figure in the Montreal Mafia. 

The sentence was part of a common suggestion presented to Superior Court Justice Éric Downs at the Gouin courthouse in northern Montreal by defence lawyer Mathieu Poissant and prosecutor Matthew Ferguson. 

“All is good,” Boucher said when asked by Downs if he had anything to say before he officially sentenced him. 

Boucher, a former member of the Hells Angels, is already serving three life sentences for having issued orders that led to the murders of two prison guards and the attempted murder of another in 1997. 

“Institutions (like penitentiaries) are not law-free zones,” Downs said in reference to how Boucher hatched the plot while he was in a federal penitentiary and Desjardins was waiting to be transferred to one. The judge also criticized Boucher for having “manipulated” his then-pregnant daughter, Alexandra Mongeau, to serve as his messenger. 

Ferguson later told reporters while Boucher, 64, is already serving life sentences, the 10-year prison term he received on Friday could push the parole eligibility date beyond the 25 years he already is required to serve before he becomes eligible for full parole. 

Alexandra Mongeau, the daughter of Maurice (Mom) Boucher, leaves the courtroom after her hearing at the Gouin Courthouse on Friday, where she pleaded guilty to being in possession of the proceeds of crime.Alexandra Mongeau, the daughter of Maurice (Mom) Boucher, leaves the courtroom after her hearing at the Gouin Courthouse on Friday, where she pleaded guilty to being in possession of the proceeds of crime.Photo by Peter McCabe /MONTREAL GAZETTE

During the same hearing, Mongeau, 28, pleaded guilty to being in possession of the proceeds of crime.

According to a summary of facts read into the court record, Mongeau was being paid a cut (referred to as rent or taxes) of the profits on drugs sold in the Mercier-Hochelaga-Maisonneuve borough between 2011 and 2015. Her cut worked out to $1,000 per month and came from traffickers who sold drugs like cocaine in neighbourhoods her father ruled over when he was clearly the leader of the Hells Angels in Montreal during the 1990s. 

The investigation revealed that Mongeau worked for her allowance. She acted as a messenger between the drug trafficking network in Hochelaga-Maisonneuve and her father while he was behind bars. It was an indication that even though he has been incarcerated since 2002, Boucher still has influence on drug trafficking in parts of the city. 

The investigation also demonstrated that Mongeau wasn’t just a messenger. Beginning in November 2014, the police noticed a man tied to the network was holding cash for the Hells Angels. Drug dealers would drop bags of money off and, on Fridays, Mongeau would pick up the money. She paid the man $1,000 each time she picked up the money. Investigators believe between $100,000 and $160,000 was collected by Mongeau on a weekly basis. When the police executed a search warrant at the apartment, in February 2015, they found two bags with a total of more than $60,000 in them. 

Based on a common suggestion from defence lawyer Anne-Sophie Bedard and Ferguson, Downs agreed to a 21-month sentence Mongeau can serve in the community. The first six months of the sentence will be served as house arrest. 

During the house arrest, she will only be allowed to leave her home for work or to attend classes. Bedard told Downs that Mongeau recently completed studies to obtain her high school diploma. During weekends, she will have a brief window of freedom to allow her to shop for necessities like food. 

She was also ordered to not communicate with many of the people she was arrested with in November 2015. She can only communicate with her father by courier and any letters she sends him can be read by authorities at the federal penitentiary where Boucher is serving time. 

As part of the same hearing, Mongeau was acquitted on charges she faced related to the plot to murder Desjardins. Boucher recently pleaded guilty to leading the conspiracy. He wanted to have Desjardins killed once he was transferred from a provincial detention centre in Montreal to a federal penitentiary in Ste-Anne-des-Plaines.

At the time, Desjardins was awaiting his sentence for his leading role in the plot to murder Mafioso Salvatore Montagna. 

Mongeau was acquitted in that case even though the prosecution had evidence she acted as her father’s messenger when he wanted to know if someone on the outside was willing to give him the green light to have Desjardins killed. According to a summary of facts entered into the court record when Boucher pleaded guilty last month, his daughter visited him at a penitentiary, on July 26, 2015, and passed on the key message from the person on the outside. 

“Yes. Euh, he said yes, do it,” Mongeau was recorded telling Boucher. The rest of the conversation revealed that Mongeau appeared to be confused over where Desjardins was supposed to be killed.

“Certainly there … I don’t know,” Mongeau said at one point while apparently revealing she didn’t even know whether Desjardins had been transferred.

Prosecutor Matthew Ferguson speaks to journalists after the trial of of Maurice (Mom) Boucher at the Gouin Courthouse in Montreal on Friday, May 11, 2018.Prosecutor Matthew Ferguson speaks to journalists after the trial of of Maurice (Mom) Boucher at the Gouin Courthouse in Montreal on Friday, May 11, 2018.Photo by Peter McCabe /MONTREAL GAZETTE

Ferguson told reporters the Crown will not comment on why it decided to no longer prosecute Mongeau for the murder conspiracy.

When the hearing was almost over on Friday, Boucher stood up in the prisoner’s dock and waited for his daughter to look toward him. When she noticed him, Boucher made hand gestures indicating he approved of how she has lost a considerable amount of weight in recent months. He gave her an enthusiastic thumbs up with both hands.

pcherry@postmedia.com

 

>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just
>>> called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit
>>> against Nova Scotia
>>> To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca

, Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca,
>>> Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/NSDeputies.html
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/LLLangley-bio.html
>>>
>>> Laura Lee Langley
>>> 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor
>>> One Government Place
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-8940
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0667
>>> Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/just/deputy.asp
>>>
>>> Karen Hudson Q.C.
>>> 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor
>>> Joseph Howe Building
>>> Halifax, NS B3J 3J9
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4223
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0510
>>> Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/sns/ceo.asp
>>>
>>> Joanne Munro:
>>> 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South
>>> Maritime Centre
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4089
>>> Fax: (902) 424-5510
>>> Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I
>>> suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown
>>> Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached
>>> to you and your Premier etc.
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>>
>>>
>>> Vertias Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
 
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
>>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
>>> contact
>>> with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
>>> Integrity Commissioner
>>>
>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
>>> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
>>> Deschênes. They have two sons.
>>>
>>> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
>>> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
>>> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
>>> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
>>> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
>>> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
>>> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
>>> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
>>> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
>>> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
>>>
>>> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
>>> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
>>>
>>> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
>>> Canada.
>>>
>>> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
>>> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
>>> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
>>> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
>>>
>>> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
>>> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
>>> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
>>> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
>>> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
>>> Registration Act.
>>>
>>> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
>>> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
>>> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
>>> and a response will be forthcoming.
>>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
>>> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
>>> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
>>> Mallory Fowler
>>> Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
>>> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
>>>
>>>

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Duggan, Jennifer"<jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:06:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Folks should watch this before it goes
"Poof" EH Jagmeet Singh ?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be away from the office from July 9-24, 2022.

Je serai absente du bureau le 9-24 juillet 2022.


---------- Original message ----------
From: ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:06:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Folks should watch this before it goes
"Poof" EH Jagmeet Singh ?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

This will confirm the Professional Ethics Office has received your
enquiry and it has been placed in a priority sequence.

Due to our volume and the complexity of some enquiries, there may be a
delay in responding.

Thank you for your patience.
__________________________________

Le Bureau de l'éthique professionnelle confirme avoir reçu votre
demande qui a été placée dans un ordre de priorité.

En raison du volume et de la complexité de certaines demandes, il peut
y avoir un délai dans la réponse.

Merci pour votre patience.

Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle
Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada
73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101
RCMP Mailstop #58/
GRC Arrêt Postal #58
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0R2

1-866-206-0195 (off/bur)

ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca<mailto:ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

"Strong Ethics, Strong Organization"
« Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide»

This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is
loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be
reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the
originator."

« Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis
en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié
ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Pineo, Robert"<RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:06:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Folks should watch this before it goes
"Poof" EH Jagmeet Singh ?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.  Please note that I will be out of the
office on July 7, 2022 attending discovery examinations.  I will be
checking my messages and will respond within 24 hours.

If you matter is urgent, please email Cassandra Billard at
cbillard@pattersonlaw.ca.

I apologize for any inconvenience.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Tom Taggart <tom.taggartmla@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 17:05:52 -0700
Subject: Re: Folks should watch this before it goes "Poof" EH Jagmeet Singh ?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting us at the office of MLA Tom.Taggart. This
email is being monitored by my Constituency Assistant Andrea. Johnson,
who will get back to you as soon as possible. If your inquiry is
urgent, please feel free to call the Constituency Office @
902-641-2335

Our Office is located @ 10653 Hwy 2 Masstown, Nova Scotia, right next
door to the Petro- Canada.
Our Office hours are Monday- Friday 8:30am - 3:30pm or by appointment.
We are closed on Holidays.

--
Tom Taggart, MLA
Colchester North
(O) - 902-641-2335
tom.taggartmla@gmail.com



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Kennedy, Aaron"<akennedy@quispamsis.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:07:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Folks should watch this before it goes
"Poof" EH Jagmeet Singh ?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.
I am out of the office until Monday, and will respond at that time. If
you require immediate assistance, please call 849-5778.
- Aaron



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bergen, Candice - M.P."<candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 00:07:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Folks should watch this before it goes
"Poof" EH Jagmeet Singh ?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Hon. Candice Bergen, thank you for contacting the
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.

Ms. Bergen greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
possible.

If you are a constituent of Ms. Bergen’s in Portage-Lisgar with an
urgent matter please provide complete contact information.  Not
identifying yourself as a constituent could result in a delayed
response.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,

Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Au nom de l’hon. Candice Bergen, nous vous remercions de communiquer
avec le Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle.

Mme Bergen accorde une grande importance aux commentaires des
Canadiens.  Nous lisons et étudions tous les courriels entrants.
Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.  Nous y
répondons le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous faites partie de l’électorat de Mme Bergen dans la
circonscription de Portage-Lisgar et que votre affaire est urgente,
veuillez fournir vos coordonnées complètes.  Si vous ne le faites pas,
cela pourrait retarder la réponse.

Nous vous remercions une fois encore d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,

Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 21:05:49 -0300
Subject: Folks should watch this before it goes "Poof" EH Jagmeet Singh ?
To: "jagmeet.singh"<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca, "pierre.poilievre"
<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, jennifer@halifaxexaminer.ca,
paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Tom.Taggartmla@gmail.com,
darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca, bmassey@justice.gc.ca, "Amato, Mike #509"
<509@yrp.ca>, brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "michelle.rempel"
<michelle.rempel@parl.gc.ca>, kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca,
Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>, akennedy@quispamsis.ca,
"elizabeth.mcmillan"<elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca>, Justice Minister
<JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, PREMIER@novascotia.ca, andrewjdouglas
<andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca,
NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, tim
<tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3N3UXQxPQTo&ab_channel=NighttimePodcast

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3N3UXQxPQTo&ab_channel=NighttimePodcast 

 


Rob 'the Carpenter' on his time with Gabriel Wortman

626 views
Jul 10, 2022
7.44K subscribers
So glad you uploaded the video version…I was hoping you were going to and as always you don’t disappoint
 
Nosy Scotian
Great interview. Would love to hear more from Rob.
 
Chesco Threesixsixsix
This is a very enjoyable format to watch. Thank you for the upload and hard work.
 
S Rogers
Great interview - thanks
 
Jax
Great work here u need to interview others let’s reach out to Dave Lilly.
 
Johns bushcam /kayaking adventures!!!
Smooth criminal . Doesn't break the law but knows every criminal and worked security for someones Mom who got murdered. LOL . Amazing how much this guy does not know LOL.
 
S Rogers
Paul do you need a transcriber? - I can do that.

 

Frank

June 7, 2022
***Editor's note: The audio clip that forms the basis of this story is a fraud. Purported by Rob Doucette to be a clip of police questioning his friend Gabriel Wortman in the murder of Kevin James Petrie, it was lifted from an old episode of CSI. Frank (obviously!-ed.) regrets the error.***
A 34-second snippet of audio tape shows that Gabriel Wortman was considered to be a person of interest in the still-unsolved murder of a Dartmouth man in 2004, according to a longtime friend of the mass killer’s.
Court records show that at the time of his murder Kevin James Petrie was a 50-year-old career criminal who had been charged more than a dozen times with drug trafficking, various thefts and assaults between 1993 and 2000. Police believe Petrie had been assaulted during an apparent home invasion at 269 Pleasant Street in Dartmouth. He died 11 days later after being found in medical distress at 7132 Spruce Street near the intersection of Joseph Howe Drive and Highway 102 in Halifax. An autopsy showed he had died from the effects of blunt force trauma to the head.
In March 2019, the fifteenth anniversary of Petrie’s murder, the Nova Scotia Department of Justice offered a $150,000 reward to help solve the murder.
Robert Doucette, who worked as Wortman’s carpenter and sidekick for almost 20 years says he was with Wortman at his denturist business at 193 Portland Street in Dartmouth when two plain clothes RCMP investigators walked through the door and introduced themselves...
Gabriel Wortman and the 2004 cold case murder of Kevin James Petrie
-by Paul Palango
(for subscribers only)
0:02 / 0:36

12 Comments

Kendelle Blois
So you didn't verify it first? How many other things aren't verified lol
Cyndi Jennings
Good work Paul & Company. Keep digging. You are doing an incredible job.
10
Shawn Roberts
To bad main stream media wouldn't report or investigate this. National Post
9
Janie Andrews
Shawn Roberts because it’s not true
Rhyno Tonja
I'm finding it hard to hear most of what is being said in the video towards the end?
Denis Mackinnon
Rhyno Tonja same is there a transcript anywhere
Alex MacLean
Sorry folks, this isn't Wortman talking, but a recording from an episode of CSI.
Alex MacLean
Does anyone here have season 9 of CSI episode 19?
Ssr Chrissy Mackenzie
We are gunna see this 30 years later on an unsolved police crimes show. You watch.
2
Kathy Withak
Guilty af. Creepy voice.
2
Ssr Chrissy Mackenzie
Oh there's still so much more 

 

 

 

 

https://www.saltwire.com/cape-breton/news/mounties-tested-claim-ns-mass-killer-disposed-of-bodies-on-his-property-100752213/ 

 

Mounties tested claim N.S. mass killer disposed of bodies on his property

FOR MASS CASUALTY STORY: The entranceway to the former  property and "warehouse" of gunman Gabriel Wortman is seen on Orchard Beach Drive, in Portapique March 30, 2022.  TIM KROCHAK PHOTO The entranceway to the former  property and 'warehouse' of gunman Gabriel Wortman is seen on Orchard Beach Drive, in Portapique on March 30, 2022. - Tim Krochak

A friend of Gabriel Wortman’s who helped him build his Portapique palace says the Dartmouth denturist was building huge fires with heavy equipment to get rid of dead bodies in the middle of the night long before the Nova Scotia mass murders.  

But a study that used ground-penetrating radar at the site found no evidence that was the case. 

Wortman had “been a sexual predator in that area for 15 years or more” and “was always telling me different ways to get rid of bodies,” Robert Doucette told the RCMP on the same day a Mountie dog handler shot the killer dead at the Enfield Big Stop. 

Doucette met the denturist about a decade ago when Wortman hired him to do some work on his Portland Street clinic. He later helped Wortman with a building project in Portapique, staying in a trailer on the property for six months. 

“Gabriel bought all the booze, all the food. And we spent a lot of time shooting his firearms. He’s got a black Glock 40.”

Doucette — who said Wortman could “hit a beer can at 75 yards” with that pistol — described several other guns Wortman owned, as well as two cases of “U.S. military issue nail grenades.” 

He told police the mass killer was “extremely loose in the head.” 

“Sometimes he just goes off. It’s like a light switch goes and it’s like all of a sudden he's just smoked three grams of cocaine or something.”

Wortman told him the large brush fires he built on his Portapique property were to burn bodies. 

He described Wortman using an excavator to build a fire that was 13 metres long and more than six metres across, then dousing the pile with more than 100 litres of gasoline before setting it alight. 

“He was burning rotten reap,” Doucette said. “And I asked him about (it).” 

'Fire's a lot quicker'

Wortman told the builder the only way to get rid of a body “is either use a lot of lime, or just make a fire. He said the fire’s a lot quicker. . . . He was always telling me different ways to get rid of bodies.” 

Doucette said the large fires happened about four times while he was working on Wortman’s property, and always in the middle of the night. 

“I wouldn’t even turn the light on in my trailer. I wouldn’t even let him know I was awake.” 

The Mass Casualty Commission said it has no evidence to support Doucette’s claim that Wortman disposed of bodies on his property. 

Mounties investigated the claim.

“By May 11, forensic identification officers had used ground penetrating radar to search the underground of the perpetrator’s Portapique property,” said documents released Tuesday by the public inquiry. 

The civic sign welcoming people to Portapique. - Eric Wynne The civic sign welcoming people to Portapique. - Eric Wynne

They checked two of Wortman’s properties on that road, as well as the one where his warehouse had been on Orchard Beach Drive, looking for spots the killer might have tried hiding human remains. 

“The Nova Scotia RCMP investigated Robert Doucette’s statement that the perpetrator had burned and buried bodies on his property in Portapique,” said documents published Tuesday by the inquiry. 

“By May 11, 2020, forensic identification officers had used ground penetrating radar to search the underground of the perpetrator’s Portapique property. The RCMP took this investigative step with the assistance of Dalhousie University ‘to determine whether anything of relevance or interest to the investigation was buried on the property.’ Nothing was recovered.” 

Doucette described Wortman’s violent outbursts toward his common-law wife, Lisa Banfield, including that he’d heard her talking about how the denturist once held a gun to her head.  

'One post at a time' 

The carpenter also told police about a day Wortman mowed down more than 26 metres of fence with his truck. 

“He took that F-150 and just smashed the whole . . . fence right down,” Doucette said. 

“Like 80 feet of it. One post at a time.” 

Wortman was angry because he found out his uncle Glynn was not leaving him a Portapique home in his will, Doucette said. 

He’s “got more money than anybody I know,” Doucette said. 

“Why he wanted that house, or that property, I have no idea . . . but he just lost it.” 

That’s not the only time a property deal made Wortman angry. 

A former friend, Kipling MacKenzie, told Mounties about a physical fight he got into with Wortman several years before the mass killings over a motel property the denturist had scammed him out of in Fredericton. Mackenzie had knocked him out, according to one witness. 

“In March 2020, the perpetrator was in Pictou County asking people where Kipling MacKenzie lived,” said a report released Tuesday by the inquiry. 

'Looking for him to kill him' 

MacKenzie had told Donald MacMillan that Wortman was in Pictou on March 19, 2020 — the night of the Laundry Mat fire — and went to Acropole Pizza asking about MacKenzie. 

“Kip told him that . . . Wortman was looking for him to kill him,” RCMP Const. Ryan Murnaghan said in an April 26, 2020 email to another police officer.  

“It’s not (too) far of a stretch knowing what we know about Wortman that if he was in town that day, he could have burnt down the laundry mat to flush Kip out, put heat on him, or thought he was living there.” 


Share to LinkedInShare to More

 

 


Petroleum investigation ordered by province killed by EUB

$
0
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suyzo1bVVkQ

 


Southwest Magazine: New Brunswick Southwest MP John Williamson Interview

5 views
Jul 25, 2022
912 subscribers
MP John Williamson discusses historic inflation rates, the August 2022 closure of Grand Manan's only bank, the effects of ArriveCAN on Campobello Island tourism, the impending reduction of hours at the Vanceboro/St. Croix international border and more on CHCO-TV. Original Broadcast Date: July 2022

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/petroleum-investigation-killed-eub-1.6518610 

 

Petroleum investigation ordered by province killed by EUB

Regulator rejects Ministerial order citing lack of jurisdiction

The province overlooked the fact the requested investigation requires powers the EUB does not possess, according to the energy regulator.

"The Board does not have jurisdiction to investigate this directive," the EUB's chief clerk Kathleen Mitchell wrote in a letter to Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland last week.

The episode adds to an apparently confused understanding by the New Brunswick government about the EUB's powers and the manner in which petroleum prices are set in the province.

New Brunswick political leaders spent much of the spring jousting over what should be done about the rising and volatile cost of petroleum, even though prices in New Brunswick, outside of taxes, were consistently the lowest in the region through the period.

Premier Blaine Higgs said in June he wanted answers from the EUB about how it sets petroleum prices even though the body follows rules made by the province. (Ed Hunter/CBC)

On June 9, in the midst of that ongoing volatility, Holland said he had directed his department "to put together some sort of a request to the EUB to analyze and come back with recommendations," about how the province could better deal with petroleum pricing issues.

"This is an effort in which we want to go forward and say, in a rapid fashion, in immediate terms, come back to us with an analysis," said Holland.

New Brunswick has regulated the maximum amount oil and gas companies can charge consumers for petroleum products since 2006. 

Rules that govern that process were devised by the province and the Energy and Utilities Board was given responsibility for applying them. 

Normally the body adjusts the upper limit of what consumers can be charged for various petroleum products once per week based on rising and falling commodity prices and the official pricing formula spelled out in legislation.

However, between January and early June this year gasoline and diesel prices jumped 70 cents per litre in New Brunswick and required 44 separate price settings in 23 weeks. 

That included 21 special "interrupter" price settings, which are required when commodity prices rise or fall on markets by six cents per litre or more in a single trading day or five cents or more in the case of  furnace oil. 

Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland ordered the Energy and Utilties Board in June to investigate better ways to set prices. The board declined, citing a lack of jurisdiction given to it in legislation. (CBC)

On June 9, the EUB lifted the maximum price for regular unleaded gasoline in New Brunswick 8.3 cents to a then record 219.6 cents per litre.  That appeared to trigger Holland's call for the EUB to investigate what government could do to soften the price shocks.

In an official letter sent later that day, Holland told the EUB he wanted it to "make an investigation on how to reduce the volatility of petroleum product pricing caused by the interruptions in the weekly price setting." 

He also wrote he wanted the body to make recommendations on "how to mitigate the impact on consumers of high petroleum prices."

In its response to the Minister sent last week the board said it "doubts" it has the authority to look at the interruptions issue and is certain it has no jurisdiction to look at mitigating high prices for consumers.

"The Board only has jurisdiction to act upon those powers expressly or implicitly delegated through enabling legislation," wrote Mitchell for the board.

"Actions outside this jurisdiction are of no force or effect." 

The EUB requires more than a letter from Holland to dig into the requested investigations, Mitchell explained, suggesting an official assignment to look at the issue from Cabinet is required. 

"If the Government were to require the Board to carry out these investigations through the Lieutenant Governor in Council, by Order in Council, the Board would be seized with jurisdiction, and have the obligation to carry out such investigations," read Mitchell's letter.  

Gasoline and diesel prices in New Brunswick jumped 70 cents per litre between January and June requiring 21 special 'interruption' price settings by the Energy and Utilities Board. (Robert Jones/CBC News)

It's not the only misunderstanding this year the province has had over the limited authority it has given the Energy and Utilities Board over petroleum pricing. 

Also in June, New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs said his government was pressing the Board to explain how it sets prices in certain market conditions, apparently unaware the body is only permitted to follow formulas given to it by government.

"We are asking those questions of the EUB right now," said Higgs.

Despite concerns expressed by New Brunswick government officials over pricing, records show consumers in the province fared reasonably well through spring price shocks compared those in neighbouring jurisdictions.

According to the energy information company Kalibrate, the average price of a litre of unleaded gasoline in Saint John was 194.6 cents per litre in May and 210.7 cents in June.  That's within one cent of prices in Halifax for those two months even though taxes on gasoline in New Brunswick are more than six cents higher than in Nova Scotia. 

Diesel prices averaged 13 cents more in Saint John than Halifax but taxes on diesel were 15 cents higher in New Brunswick.

Asked this week whether the province will pass an order-in-council directing the EUB to conduct the investigations requested by Holland, his department indicated in an email it is now doing the work on its own.

"We are currently reviewing the Petroleum Products Pricing Act and will bring forward recommendations to government on how the Act can be amended to better protect consumers, and to provide more certainty and stability for retailers and everyday drivers," wrote spokesperson Nick Brown.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Robert Jones

Reporter

Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.

19 Comments

 
 
John D Bond
Another consequence of not being fully aware of how the world works. First poorly written emergency health orders that fail to pass the legal test when people are charged that are being thrown out of court for being to vague. Then creating a rental cap increase that would prevent people from losing their homes that has more holes than a brick of swiss cheese. Now not understanding how world markets work, the drivers for volatility in global markets for petroleum products and the asking the EUB to do something the legislation that created it does not provide tools for.
Rather substandard performance from the government. What the heck are the opposition parties doing in NB, they should be all over this and organizing like crazy. With a track record like this, they don't deserve to get re elected, but what to do when there are no viable options present.

 
David Sampson
How silly the government must be to think they could change the pricing of gas at the pumps without approval from the Irvings!
 
 
 
 
Johnny Jakobs
Keep drinking the kool aid and nothing will change.
 
 
 
Fred Brewer
This would be funny if it were not so sad. Mr. Holland asks the EUB to fix a problem that was created by the Dept of Energy back in 2006. The gasoline pricing formula was entirely devised by government, so government via the Dept of Energy should be able to adjust the formula without any outside help.

Why involve the EUB unless you are looking for someone else to blame?
 
Billy Joe Mcallister
Reply to @Fred Brewer: Holland is an empty suit 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Alex Butt 
I can not believe that people, especially new brunswickers fall for this smoke & mirrors. Every one knows that higgs is rolling is excess tax cash and loving every moment and is doing everything in his power to protect this and his buddies like the irvings bottom line, all the while the rest of us are are being financially decimated!
 
Les Cooper
Reply to @Alex Butt: you have proof?
 
 
Billy Joe Mcallister
Reply to @Les Cooper: Whether anyone has proof or not is moot. All that is required is a brain and a set of eyes
 
 
 
 
 
Carl Douglas
I think it would surprise most people to know the Crown still owns Canada. If you don't pay your taxes your land reverts to the crown, you sign a contract with a province you sign a contract with the Crown through the crowns representative. Ever wonder why the Queens representative has a massive mansion in Fredericton and yet the premier lives in a modest split level home? Perhaps we could ask the Queen for a break on fuel taxes. FYI "The land of Canada is solely owned by Queen Elizabeth II who .
 
Fred Brewer
Reply to @Carl Douglas: I will have to call BS on your statement that if you don't pay your taxes your land "reverts" to the crown. The land can be sold to recover the taxes, but that's about it. The crown cannot for instance take your land and build a shopping mall on it. They can sell it to recover the taxes but anything more than the taxes owed that gets recovered goes to the land owner or the holder of the mortgage.

Johnny Jakobs
Reply to @Fred Brewer: can the crown take your land if they want to build a highway through it? Yes. And yes, the crown can take your land.
 
Les Cooper
Reply to @Carl Douglas: the crown owns the crown land. Hence the name.
 
Carl Douglas
Reply to @Fred Brewer: If the land is sold you don't own it. What's the BS part? I'd expect most people would know that. I'm only pointing to the fact that the land is owned by the Crown (minus the 9.7%). That's fact not BS. 
 
 
 
 
 
Michael Collins
Turns out the EUB is just another paper tiger. That board or the government will not get the Irving Empire to reveal it's margins and profits, in particular the crack spread.
 
Donald Gallant
Reply to @Michael Collins:
Same for any other oil company.
 
Billy Joe Mcallister
Reply to @Michael Collins: Most boards come to be as fronts that follow and deliver directives from on high. They exist at the pleasure of their funders. They make the day to day decisions pertaining to daily operations while all the major changes are always political and/ or corporate
 
Rusty Shackleford
Reply to @Michael Collins: Its funny how everyone likes to blame the high gas pricing on Irving....funny, I don't see the price cheaper anywhere else. As a matter of fact, I hear gas is a little expensive in other provinces and countries too...man oh man those Irvings must have a further reach than I figured. Glad you guys have it all figured out. We should drive them out immediately. But wait...don't they employ 1 in 12 people here in NB? What do we tell them? What do you think it would do to our tax base if they were gone? Perhaps we should get rid of the McCain's as well while were at it? Its easy to blame all the problems on the big targets...Irving, McCain's, Trudeau, Higgs. Things are a bit more complex than that, and we have evolved critical thinking skills to work these things out. A shame we don't use them anymore.
 
 
Brian mcknight
That's convenient

Commission seeks to revoke real estate agency's licence for alleged rule violations

$
0
0

 https://www.c21.ca/directory/agents/audrie-beaulieu

Audrie Beaulieu

Audrie Beaulieu, Owner in Moncton, CENTURY 21 Canada

Owner

CENTURY 21 A & T Countryside Realty Inc.
1690 Mountain Rd

Moncton, NB E1g1a6

 

 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Steeves, Ernie Hon. (FTB/FCT)"<Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:17:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Audrie Beaulieu could use a friend
today N'esy Pas Ernie Steeves?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I am currently out of the office. I will gladly reply to your message
upon my return on July 18th, 2022. Thank you

Je suis présentement absent du bureau. Il me fera plaisir de répondre
à votre message dès mon retour le 18 juillet 2022. Merci



---------- Original message ----------
From: Michel Boudreau <michel@lutz.nb.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 19:15:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Audrie Beaulieu could use a friend
today N'esy Pas Ernie Steeves?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office on July 18th, 2022.  I may or may not be
able to access your email during this time.  If there is an emergency,
please contact our receptionist at 832-1500 and she will direct your
call.

Methinks Audrie Beaulieu could use a friend today N'esy Pas Ernie Steeves?

   Inbox 
Unstarred  David AmosWed, Jul 13, 2022 at 4:15 PM

Add star 

Mail Delivery Subsystem

<mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 4:15 PM
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Error Icon

Message blocked

Your message to shane.magee@cbc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information.
LEARN MORE
WarningThis link will take you to a third-party site
The response from the remote server was:

554 Email rejected due to security policies - https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#554 [geBbmkcMOpGqXgG7ISKOnA.uk15]


Final-Recipient: rfc822; shane.magee@cbc.ca
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; eu-smtp-inbound-2.mimecast.com. (91.220.42.211, the server
 for the domain cbc.ca.)
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 554 Email rejected due to security policies - https://community.mimecast.com/docs/DOC-1369#554 [geBbmkcMOpGqXgG7ISKOnA.uk15]
Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 12:15:51 -0700 (PDT)


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
To: audrie.beaulieu@century21.ca, media@fcnb.ca, shane.magee@cbc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, michel@lutz.nb.ca, michel.boudreau@fcnb.ca, "ernie.steeves"<ernie.steeves@gnb.ca>, registrar-greffier@tribunalnb.ca, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Bcc: 
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:15:48 -0300
Subject: Methinks Audrie Beaulieu could use a friend today N'esy Pas Ernie Steeves?
----- Message truncated -----

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/realty-complaint-update-1.6519099

 

Document offers more details about real estate agency's alleged problems

Regulator seeks closure of Century 21 A&T Countryside Realty Inc., agency says it will defend itself

More information has emerged about the allegations against a New Brunswick real estate agency that a regulator wants shutdown. 

The Financial and Consumer Services Commission announced Tuesday it filed an application seeking to revoke the licence of Century 21 A&T Countryside Realty Inc. 

However, few details were offered beyond a news release. The Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal, which would hear the request, released a copy of the statement of allegations Wednesday. The statement names the agency and a manager as respondents.

The document alleges there were repeated instances in which a trust fund account had insufficient funds compared to what it should have held, funds were used "for purposes other than the terms on which it was received," funds were withdrawn before they should have been, and there were complaints about late commission payments. 

In the period between an offer being accepted an the closing date, a buyer may be required to provide a deposit. 

The Real Estate Agents Act states that when an agent receives a cheque as a deposit with an offer, the money must be placed into a trust account when the offer is accepted.

Agency to defend itself

A&T Countryside Realty has not provided an interview. In a statement to media on Wednesday, the agency said it takes the allegations seriously and has spent "considerable time and resources addressing" the commission's requests.

"Century 21 A&T Countryside Realty Inc. will defend the allegations and welcomes the opportunity to tell its side of the story at the Tribunal," it stated.

The agency's statement says it takes issue with the commission's news release issued Tuesday because it doesn't contain all of the facts and could be misinterpreted.

The statement did not address some of the more specific information laid out in the statement of allegations. A lawyer representing the agency did not respond to a request for an interview.

The statement of allegations says there were complaints from the real estate industry about late commission payments from A&T Countryside Realty. (Pierre Fournier/CBC)

The statement says the agency opened its first office six years ago in Moncton. The commission has said the agency now has 24 sales people with offices in Fredericton, Rothesay, Saint Andrews, Shediac, and Campbellton.

The complaint names a manager who worked at A&T's Moncton office since 2016. It says the person oversees sales records of agents by ensuring proper document handling, record keeping, and trust account administration.

The manager declined to comment. 

The alleged violations largely centre on the trust accounts, saying rules were repeatedly violated. 

The Respondents also apparently do not consider the repeated trust account breaches to be serious, as they have not corrected the deficiencies brought to their attention.
- Statement of allegations

"It further appears that the trust fund handling by the Respondents has been deficient since the opening of the agency, and that the Respondents did not have the proper procedures in place to oversee proper trust account administration," the statement of allegations says.

It says attempts to bring the agency into compliance over several years have not led to changes in practices. 

"The Respondents also apparently do not consider the repeated trust account breaches to be serious, as they have not corrected the deficiencies brought to their attention," the document states. 

The statement of allegations says the agency has 30 days from the time it receives the document to file a notice it intends to defend itself. It's unclear how long it may take for the tribunal to hear the issue and make a decision.

In the statement to media saying it would defend itself before the tribunal, the agency said it will "continue working with [the commission's] reasonable and necessary requests." It also said the agency remains open and operational.

New Brunswick RCMP spokesperson Sgt. Nick Arbour said the force has not received a complaint about the agency.

The New Brunswick Real Estate Association, which co-regulates the real estate industry with the Financial and Consumer Services Commission, did not provide an interview.

In an emailed statement, it only said it respects the commission's role in "taking any necessary steps to initiate enforcement proceedings in the interest of protecting the public."

The association referred any other questions to the commission. The commission in turn said it wouldn't comment and directed CBC News to the statement of allegations.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Shane Magee

Reporter

Shane Magee is a Moncton-based reporter for CBC. He can be reached at shane.magee@cbc.ca.

 
 
 
 

NB Securities Commission

 
 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

RCMP Hospital

Description:

Who said I wasn't falsely imprisoned in the looney bin because of false hearsey accustions made against me by chickenshit RCMP dudes in Fat Fred City??? EH ya nasty French bastard of a blogger named Chucky LeBlanc???
 
 


 
 
 
 

Integrity Yea Right

 









 
 
 
Full Committee Hearing

Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry

Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time:   02:00 PM

Topic

The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”

Witnesses

Witness Panel 1

  1. Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
    Director - Division of Enforcement
    Securities and Exchange Commission
  2. Mr. Robert Glauber
    Chairman and CEO
    National Association of Securities Dealers
  3. Eliot Spitzer
    Attorney General
    State of New York
 
 

 

 https://www.saskatchewan.ca/government/directory?p=d78f7d8b-777f-436a-9d28-24baa2aeaafe

 

Earl McNutt

TitleInvestigator
OrganizationEnforcement

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority
FAX306-787-5899
Telephone Number306-787-5850
Emailearl.mcnutt@gov.sk.ca
Mailing Address6th Floor, 1919 Saskatchewan Drive, Regina, SK, S4P 4H2

 

https://globalnews.ca/video/8654174/podcast-on-investment-scams-hopes-to-educate-manitobans

 

Podcast on investment scams hopes to educate Manitobans

"Their whole method of operation is just to separate you from your money, so they'll tell you anything they think you need to hear." Manitoba Securities Commission and Money Smart Manitoba launched a podcast on investment scams to educate Manitobans. Global News Morning spoke with senior investigator Jason Roy, to talk about prevention. 
 

https://www.facebook.com/100717397986113/posts/had-another-family-just-write-in-about-their-story-they-have-also-started-a-form/129631998427986/ 

 


September 30, 2019 
HAD ANOTHER FAMILY JUST WRITE IN ABOUT THEIR STORY. THEY HAVE ALSO STARTED A FORMAL COMPLAINT TO MANITOBA SECURITIES COMMISSION REGARDING SCOTT KURZ AND JOE FIORILLO.
HERE IS DIRECT CONTACT INFORMATION FOR THE REPRESENTATIVES THAT ARE HANDLING YOUR COMPLAINTS.
Manitoba Securities Commission
Jason Roy -Senior investigator
Office: 204-945-4116
Email: Jason.Roy@gov.mb.ca
Andrew Tighe
Investigator
204-945-2556
Andrew.Tighe@gov.mb.ca
Please call as soon as possible and start your complaint right away.

https://mbsecurities.ca/complaints-guidance/alert-warnings/alerts/perch.html

Investor Alerts

The Manitoba Securities Commission
1130-405 Broadway
Winnipeg, MB
R3C 3L6

November 7, 2003

For Immediate Release

MSC Issues Alert for Improper Trading in Securities

Winnipeg, - The Manitoba Securities Commission is releasing an Investor Alert regarding Gary Perch of Winnipeg, Manitoba.

Commission staff have learned that Gary Perch has been soliciting money from the public to invest in his Winnipeg based pro golf shop. Staff have also learned that at least three people have given money to Gary Perch

Gary Perch has been recently advertising for money through a local newspaper. Gary Perch was contacted by Commission staff and told not to solicit the public unless he had an exemption to do so. Gary Perch indicated that he would comply. Gary Perch has not complied and has continued with his activities.

The public is being warned that Gary Perch is not permitted to collect money from the public in this way. If you have invested your money with him, your money may be at risk.

If anyone has been solicited by Gary Perch or given him money for investment purposes, please contact Jason Roy, Investigator with The Manitoba Securities Commission at 945-4116.

Media relations contacts:
Manitoba Securities Commission
Ainsley Cunningham
204-945-4733
1-800-655-5244 (Manitoba only)
aicunningh@gov.mb.ca

 

 

https://www.fcnb.ca/en/news-alerts/joint-forum-of-financial-market-regulators-receive-early-feedback-regarding-total-cost-reporting-and 

 

Joint Forum of Financial Market Regulators receive early feedback regarding total cost reporting and climate change

CSA logo

Toronto – The Joint Forum of Financial Market Regulators (Joint Forum) held its annual meeting on June 15, 2022. The Joint Forum brings together members of the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), the Canadian Council of Insurance Regulators (CCIR), the Canadian Association of Pension Supervisory Authorities (CAPSA) and representatives from the Canadian Insurance Services Regulatory Organizations (CISRO), as well as from the Mortgage Broker Regulators’ Council of Canada (MBRCC).

The Joint Forum heard feedback from key stakeholders representing industry associations and consumer advocates regarding the Total Cost Reporting (TCR) consultation. The TCR consultation (CSA members' websites and CCIR website) proposes enhanced cost disclosure reporting requirements for investment funds and segregated funds. Enhanced cost disclosure increases public protection by improving investors’ and policy holders’ awareness of ongoing embedded fees and contributes towards informed financial decisions. The consultation was launched on April 28, 2022 and formal submissions will be accepted until July 27, 2022. The Joint Forum members received initial comments on scope and implementation issues, level of information for investors and policy holders; and proposed transition period. 

The Joint Forum members received presentations about climate change, in particular, the frequency, severity and costs of extreme weather events as well as some private and public sector partnerships that are currently underway. Don Forgeron, President and CEO of the Insurance Bureau of Canada, and President of the Global Federation of Insurance Associations, delivered a national and international view from the property and casualty insurance sector. Kathy Bardswick, Chair of the Government of Canada’s Sustainable Finance Action Council, highlighted the initial work of the Council and steps regulators and the private sector can take toward achieving a sustainable finance eco-system in Canada.

“Regulators are committed to bringing TCR to market and will work closely with both the insurance and securities sectors to accomplish this in the most expedient manner,” said Robert Bradley, CCIR Chair and Superintendent of Insurance, Prince Edward Island. “Policy holders and investors deserve to understand all costs associated with owning investment and segregated fund products and be able to more easily compare their performance. Insurance regulators understand that the insurance industry is supportive of this initiative and have been aware since the release of our 2017 CCIR Position Paper on segregated funds.”

“The Total Cost Reporting project is crucial to complete the work introduced in 2013 under the CRM2 by providing  investors with information on all costs, including ongoing embedded costs such as management fees and trading expenses, of owning investment funds,” said Louis Morisset, CSA Chair and President and CEO of the Autorité des marchés financiers. “We continue to encourage registrants and insurers to conduct advance planning in order to implement the necessary changes as quickly as possible following the finalization of the TCR requirements.”

Tamara DeMos, CAPSA Vice-Chair, Chair of CAPSA’s ESG Committee and Managing Director, Private Pension Plans Division, Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions said that “Amongst all of the ESG considerations, the potentially intense effects of a disorderly transition to a lower carbon economy is driving regulators to accelerate and focus their efforts on climate-related risks. Pension plans need to assess their resilience to climate-related risks and meet their fiduciary obligations in an uncertain economic environment. Our work with other regulators is key to finding timely and effective risk management expectations that help protect members and beneficiaries.”

CCIR is an inter-jurisdictional association of insurance regulators. The mandate of the CCIR is to facilitate and promote an efficient and effective insurance regulatory system in Canada to serve the public interest.

The CSA, the council of the securities regulators of Canada’s provinces and territories, co-ordinates and harmonizes regulation for the Canadian capital markets.

CAPSA is a national association of pension regulators whose mission is to facilitate an efficient and effective pension regulatory system in Canada. It develops practical solutions to further the coordination and harmonization of pension regulation across Canada.

For media inquiries, please contact:
 
Ilana Kelemen
Canadian Securities Administrators
media@acvm-csa.ca

Russ Courtney 
Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Ontario
(For English insurance related - Toronto)
russ.courtney@fsrao.ca
437-225-8551

For Investor inquiries, please refer to your respective securities regulator. You can contact them here

 

https://www.securities-administrators.ca/about/contact-us/

Contact Us

CSA Secretariat

Canadian Securities Administrators
Tour de la Bourse
2010-800, Square Victoria
Montréal (Québec) H4Z 1J2
Tel: (514) 864-9510
Fax: (514) 864-9512
The CSA Secretariat is open from Monday to Friday from 8:30 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. ET.

In light of the exceptional situation caused by COVID-19, we encourage you to forward your questions by email: info@acvm-csa.ca.

Media requests can be forwarded by email to: media@acvm-csa.ca.

We will contact you as soon as possible. Thank you for your understanding.

Alberta

Alberta Securities Commission
Suite 600, 250–5 Street SW
Calgary, Alberta T2P 0R4
Fax: (403) 297-6156
Inquiries: Inquiries@asc.ca

British Columbia

British Columbia Securities Commission
P.O. Box 10142, Pacific Centre
Vancouver, BC V7Y 1L2
Fax: (604) 899-6506

Manitoba

The Manitoba Securities Commission
500-400 St. Mary Avenue
Winnipeg, MB R3C 4K5
Fax: (204) 945-0330

New Brunswick

Financial and Consumer Services Commission
85 Charlotte Street, Suite 300
Saint John, NB E2L 2J2
Fax: (506) 658-3059
Inquiries: info@fcnb.ca

Newfoundland and Labrador

Office of the Superintendent of Securities Service Newfoundland and Labrador
Service Newfoundland & Labrador
St. John's, NL A1B 4J6
Fax: (709) 729-6187

Northwest Territories

Office of the Superintendent of Securities
Department of Justice Government of Northwest Territories
Yellowknife, NT X1A 2L9
Fax: (867) 873-0243

Nova Scotia

Nova Scotia Securities Commission
Suite 400, 5251 Duke Street
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1P3
Fax: (902) 424-4625

Nunavut

Office of the Superintendent of Securities Nunavut
1st Floor, Brown Building
Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0

Ontario

Ontario Securities Commission
20 Queen Street West
Toronto, ON M5H 3S8
Fax: (416) 593-8122

Prince Edward Island

The Office of the Superintendent Securities
Consumer, Corporate and Insurance Services Division Office of the Attorney General
Charlottetown, PE C1A 7N8
Fax: (902) 368-5283

Québec

Autorité des marchés financiers
800, Square Victoria, 22e étage
Montréal, QC H4Z 1G3

Saskatchewan

Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority of Saskatchewan
6th Floor 1919 Saskatchewan Drive
Regina, SK S4P 3V7
Fax: (306) 787-5899

Yukon

Office of the Yukon Superintendent of Securities
307 Black Street, 1st Floor,
Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2N1
Fax: (867) 393-6251

 

 

https://www.fcnb.ca/en/about-the-fcnb 

 

About the FCNB

FCNB provides New Brunswickers with the knowledge, skills, and confidence to make informed spending and investing decisions.

We inform, educate, and protect over 800,000 consumers through regulation and financial education, and we regulate 36,000 industry participants who make their living working with New Brunswickers’ money.

As the province’s financial and consumer services regulator, we are responsible for the administration and enforcement of provincial legislation that regulates securities, insurance, pensions, credit unions, trust and loan companies, cooperatives, and more.

Our vision

Working together for regulatory excellence in financial and consumer services for New Brunswickers.

Our mandate

To provide regulatory services that protect the public interest, enhance public confidence and promote understanding of the regulated sectors through educational programs. We recognize the importance of setting an example in the areas of transparency and effective governance.

We are an arm's length, self-funded, independent Crown Corporation established by the provincial government on 1 July 2013. We are funded by the regulatory fees and assessments paid by the regulated sectors.

Our goals

People IconPeople: Build upon a highly skilled workforce that is passionate about what we do.


process iconProcess: Excel in the development of effective, practical and responsive regulatory services.


Consumer and Market Participants iconConsumer and Market Participants: Reduce risk and harm and build trust, awareness and fairness in financial and consumer services for New Brunswickers.

financial iconFinancial: Optimize our financial capacity to accomplish our mandate and deliver value to New Brunswickers.
 

ESG IconEnvironmental, Social and Governance (ESG): Embrace the ethical and practical values of ESG toward a more inclusive, sustainable and prosperous future.

Our values

Professional: Bring our best to the table every day to deliver high quality, forward-thinking work.

Respectful: Treat each other and the people we serve with dignity and respect.

Accountable: Be accountable for our work, our words and our actions.

Ethical: Act with integrity, be trustworthy and fair.

Inclusive: Respect and welcome different ideas, strengths, beliefs, interests, personal situations and diverse backgrounds.

Supportive: Work collaboratively, support learning and growth and celebrate each other’s successes.

 

Organization

FCNB is comprised of ten distinct divisions.

The Insurance Division administers the Insurance Act through the regulation, oversight, and licensing of insurers and insurance intermediaries (adjusters, agents and brokers, damage appraisers). This includes life, health, property, and casualty insurance.

The Pension Division is responsible for the enforcement of standards prescribed under the Pension Benefits Act and for the investigation of alleged violations. This division performs a variety of services, such as reviewing and registering documents that create and support pension plans, providing requested information about pension plans and retirement savings arrangements, and monitoring private pension plans to ensure compliance with the Act and its regulations.

The Securities Division administers the Securities Act through the regulation and oversight of registrants, securities issuers, and self-regulatory organizations. It reviews offering documents, continuous disclosure documents, and exemption applications to ensure these filings comply with securities laws. This division reviews applications for registration from dealers and advisers who are in the business of trading or advising in securities.

The Financial Institutions Division oversees the financial stability and solvency of credit unions for the protection of depositors and provides the related corporate registry services. It oversees the financial stability and solvency of provincially incorporated loan and trust companies, as well as regulating the licensing of extra-provincial loan and trust companies. This division is also responsible for the regulation and the incorporation of cooperatives.

The Consumer Affairs Division administers a wide range of consumer legislation. Activities include investigating consumer complaints, providing information and direction to the public on how to resolve their complaints, educating consumers and businesses on their rights and responsibilities, and issuing licences for the businesses under our consumer legislation.

The Enforcement Division is responsible for the assessment, investigation, and, in appropriate cases, prosecution of violations of the various laws over which FCNB has authority.

The Communications and Public Affairs Division is responsible for the development and delivery of FCNB’s financial literacy, consumer protection and awareness materials and for delivering presentations and workshops on these topics throughout the province.

The Unclaimed Property Division administers the Unclaimed Property Act. The Act will establish a free searchable list that helps reconnect New Brunswickers with their lost or forgotten monetary property. Under the Act, businesses and other entities holding unclaimed property are required to review their books and deliver any unclaimed monetary property to the Director.

Additionally, FCNB depends on the expertise of professionals in Legal Services, Information Technology and Regulatory Informatics, and Corporate Services.

 

Governance

The Commission is a Crown corporation created for the purpose of administering financial and consumer services legislation in New Brunswick.  Commission staff discharge the responsibilities prescribed by legislation and are overseen by Commission Members.

Commission Members, led by the independent chair, are accountable to the government through the Minister of Finance for the proper administration of the financial and consumer services legislation.  Members act as the board of directors; they develop policies, recommend changes to legislation and are responsible for management oversight. The chair presides over the Commission in its corporate capacity as a board of directors and in its capacity as a regulatory policy-maker.

The chief executive officer is responsible for the overall performance and management of the Commission, its staff and its day-to-day operations.

Under the Financial and Consumer Services Act A tribunal called the Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal has been established. The Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal performs adjudicative functions of the regulated sectors’ legislation independently from the activities of the Commission.

Our Governance Policy (PDF) includes details of efforts to ensure good governance and accountability.

It also includes the terms of reference for each of the Commission’s standing committees: the Audit and Risk Management Committee, and the Human Resources and Governance Committee.

The objective of the policy is to provide a flexible and practical framework for effective management and decision-making by the Commission. We report on our governance practices annually.

Conflict of Interest

RULE CO-001 - CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Report on Governance Practices

Report on Governance Practices - June 2022
Report on Governance Practices - June 2021
Report on Governance Practices - September 2020
Report on Governance Practices - June 2019    
Report on Governance Practices - June 2018    
Report on Governance Practices - June 2017    

Policies

CM3-101 Governance Release 15    

 

Commission Members

Expectations of all FCNB members

Each member is responsible for the effective management and execution of many duties including, but not limited to, the following:

  • Participate in the review and approval of Commission policies and strategies and in monitoring their implementation
  • Be an available resource to management and the Commission
  • Understand the difference between governing and managing, and not encroach on management’s area of responsibility

  • Encourage free and open discussion of the affairs of the Commission by its members

  • Become acquainted with senior management and question them appropriately and at proper times on strategy, implementation and results

  • Participate on committees when asked and become knowledgeable about the purposes and terms of reference of the committees

  • Be an effective ambassador for and representative of the Commission

  • Act at all times in the best interest of the Commission and conduct business and personal affairs in a manner which avoids embarrassment to the Commission

  • Attend all Commission and standing committee meetings unless special circumstances, as acknowledged by the Chair, prevent the member from attending

Appointment of members

All members are appointed by an Order-in-Council issued by the Lieutenant-Governor-in-Council. The Commission plays a role in the selection of candidates to recommend to the Minister for appointment to the Commission. The Human Resources and Governance Committee establishes the nomination process. The Human Resources and Governance Committee recommends candidates to the Commission to be recommended to the Minister. The Chair presents the list of the Commission’s recommended candidates and their profiles to the Minister.

For a full description of member duties and responsibilities, member appointment process, and the responsibilities attached to specific member roles, please consult the FCNB Governance Policy document.

Donald French
Vice Chair
Tania Morris.

 

 

http://www.fcnbtribunal.ca/welcome.html

The Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal is an administrative tribunal established by the Government of New Brunswick to provide independent adjudication and oversight in the financial and consumer services sectors.  Hearings are heard and decided by panels of one or more Tribunal Members having experience in legal matters and the regulated sectors.  The Tribunal is fair and accessible and promotes access to justice for all parties appearing before it.  For more information, please contact the Registrar of the Tribunal.

The Tribunal

The Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal is an administrative tribunal created by the Legislature pursuant to section 29 of the Financial and Consumer Services Commission Act [Act].  It has been in operation since July 1, 2013. The Tribunal is quasi-judicial in nature and has broad adjudicative powers, which include several “court-like” powers.  


The Tribunal hears appeals, reviews, applications and enforcement proceedings under financial and consumer services legislation.


The Tribunal typically hears matters in Saint John or Fredericton, but may hold hearings in other locations.


Mandate

 

The Tribunal’s mandate is to protect the public interest and enhance public confidence in the financial and consumer services sectors. The Tribunal provides independent adjudication and oversight in the financial and consumer services sectors.


The Tribunal has three main roles:


1.

It hears enforcement proceedings under:

 
    • the Collection and Debt Settlement Services Act;
    • the Cooperatives Act;
    • the Cost of Credit Disclosure and Payday Loans Act;
    • the Credit Reporting Services Act;
    • the Credit Unions Act;
    • the Direct Sellers Act;
    • the Insurance Act;
    • the Mortgage Brokers Act;
    • the Pension Benefits Act;
    • the Pre-arranged Funeral Services Act;
    • the Real Estate Agents Act;
    • the Securities Act; and
    • the Unclaimed Property Act.

2.

It provides independent oversight by hearing appeals and reviews of the following regulators and decision-makers' decisions:

 
  • the Superintendent of Insurance under the Insurance Act,

  • the Superintendent of Pensions under the Pension Benefits Act and the Pooled Registered Pension Plans Act,
 
  • the Financial and Consumer Services Commission under the Financial and Consumer Services Commission Act;

  • the Director of Consumer Affairs under the Auctioneers Licence Act, the Collection and Debt Settlement Services Act, the Cost of Credit Disclosure Act and Payday Loans Act, the Credit Reporting Services Act, the Direct Sellers Act, the Pre-arranged Funeral Services Act, and the Real Estate Agents Act,

  • the Director of Cooperatives under the Cooperatives Act,

  • the Executive Director of Securities or an exchange, self-regulatory organization, quotation and trade reporting system, clearing agency, auditor oversight body, trade repository and derivatives trading facility under the Securities Act,

  • the Director of Mortgage Brokers under the Mortgage Brokers Act,

  • the Superintendent of Credit Unions under the Credit Unions Act, and

  • the Superintendent of Loan and Trust Companies under the Loan and Trust Companies Act

  • the Director of unclaimed property under the Unclaimed Property Act.

3.     It hears applications under various pieces of legislation, including applications providing an opportunity to be heard.


Members

The Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal consists of a chair and other members appointed by Order-in-Council.  Members hold hearings, make rulings, review and analyze evidence and make decisions.  Below is a list of the Tribunal's members.

Daniel Léger

Member


Mr. Léger was called to the bar in 2015, and endeavours mostly in the fields of family and criminal law as a sole practitioner. He also represents the otherwise unrepresented by dedicating a portion of his time to acting as duty counsel in Provincial Court and in the Court of Queen’s Bench, Family Division.

 

In addition to his role as member of the Consumer and Financial Services Tribunal, Mr. Léger has been a vice-chairperson of the Worker’s Compensation Appeals Tribunal and is currently the Chairperson of the Mental Health Review Board.

 

Mr. Léger is fluently bilingual and is a member of the Law Society of New Brunswick and the Canadian Bar association.

 

 

 

---------- Original message ----------
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:15:48 -0300
Subject: Methinks Audrie Beaulieu could use a friend today N'esy Pas
Ernie Steeves?
registrar-greffier@tribunalnb.ca, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"

 

Commission seeks to revoke real estate agency's licence for alleged rule violations

Century 21 A&T Countryside Realty Inc. allegedly 'persistently and repeatedly' breached rules

New Brunswick's Financial and Consumer Services Commission is seeking to shut down a real estate agency, citing alleged violations related to trust accounts and other rules. 

The commission says in a news release issued Tuesday it has filed a statement of allegations with the Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal seeking to revoke the licence of Century 21 A&T Countryside Realty Inc., cease all regulated activity and pay a fine.

The agency has 24 realtors in Moncton, Saint Andrews, Fredericton and Rothesay and has a number of active real estate listings. 

Audrie Beaulieu, listed as a co-owner of the agency, told CBC there wouldn't be a comment Tuesday, but said a statement will be issued Wednesday.

It's alleged the agency "persistently and repeatedly breached various trust account rules and other provisions" of the Real Estate Agents Act even after it was placed under a lengthy period of supervision.

The release did not say specifically what violations are alleged. CBC has requested a copy of the statement of allegations from the tribunal. The commission did not provide an interview.

The administrative tribunal's website says it provides independent adjudication and oversight in the financial and consumer services sectors.

Conditions imposed after 2019 inspection

The commission's news release says a 2019 inspection by the New Brunswick Real Estate Association, which co-regulates the sector, "found deficiencies in its trust account and its financial reporting oversight" that led to the commission imposing conditions on the agency's licence. 

Those conditions included providing financial statements, quarterly reviews of the trust accounts by an independent third party, and monthly trust reconciliation and supporting documentation to the commission. 

The news release says that after several opportunities and extensions, the agency repeatedly failed to meet the terms and conditions on its licence.

"FCNB alleges this non-compliance presents a risk to consumers and has filed an enforcement proceeding to revoke the agency's licence," the release states. 

It says if the tribunal revokes the licence, any active listings could be negotiated with a new agency.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Shane Magee

Reporter

Shane Magee is a Moncton-based reporter for CBC. He can be reached at shane.magee@cbc.ca.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal
85 Charlotte Street
Saint John, NB
E2L 2J2

Toll free: (855) 267-1454
Telephone: (506) 658-5575
Fax: (506) 462-2157
e-mail: registrar-greffier@tribunalnb.ca

https://www.fcnb.ca/en/news-alerts/fcnb-files-to-have-new-brunswick-real-estate-agency-licence-revoked

The Financial and Consumer Services Commission of New Brunswick (FCNB)
has initiated an enforcement action, filing a statement of allegations
with the Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal (the Tribunal)
seeking to revoke the licence of a New Brunswick real estate agency.

The statement of allegations filed with the Tribunal alleges that
Century 21 A&T Countryside Realty Inc. (the agency) has persistently
and repeatedly breached various trust account rules and other
provisions under the Real Estate Agents Act (the Act), even after
being placed under a lengthy period of supervision. In addition to
revoking their licence, FCNB is also seeking that the agency cease
conducting all regulated activity and pay an administrative penalty
and hearing costs.

The New Brunswick real estate industry is co-regulated by FCNB and the
New Brunswick Real Estate Association (NBREA). The Act provides FCNB
the authority to investigate complaints and order financial audits
when necessary. Penalties are provided for non-compliance.

“Part of our role in administering the Real Estate Agents Act is to
conduct compliance reviews,” says Alaina Nicholson, Director of
Consumer Affairs at FCNB. “When we find evidence of non-compliance,
it’s our job to hold those people or entities accountable to ensure
their clients are fairly treated and that trust funds are properly
managed.”

In 2019, an inspection of the agency by the NBREA found deficiencies
in its trust account and its financial reporting oversight, leading
FCNB to place terms and conditions on the agency’s licence. As a term
and condition, the agency agreed to submit financial statements,
quarterly reviews of the trust accounts by an independent third-party,
and monthly trust reconciliation and supporting documentation to FCNB.

The statement of allegations filed with the Tribunal alleges that
after several opportunities and extensions, the agency has repeatedly
failed to meet the terms and conditions on their licence. FCNB alleges
this non-compliance presents a risk to consumers and has filed an
enforcement proceeding to revoke the agency’s licence.

Century 21 A&T Countryside Realty Inc. has 24 real estate salespeople
in Moncton, St. Andrews, Fredericton and Rothesay. Should the Tribunal
revoke the agency’s licence, any active listings with the agency could
be negotiated with a new agency.

New Brunswickers who have any concerns about a real estate
transaction, a mortgage transaction or an investment opportunity are
encouraged to contact FCNB.


Audio file of Alaina Nicholson, director of consumer affairs, FCNB

Quote


Media Contact:

1 866 933-2222 or media@fcnb.ca.

FCNB has the mandate to protect consumers and enhance public
confidence in the financial and consumer marketplace through the
provision of regulatory and educational services. It is responsible
for the administration and enforcement of provincial legislation
regulating mortgage brokers, payday lenders, real estate, securities,
insurance, pensions, credit unions, trust and loan companies,
cooperatives, and a wide range of other consumer legislation. It is an
independent Crown corporation funded by the regulatory fees and
assessments paid by the regulated sectors. Online educational tools
and resources are available at www.fcnb.ca.




http://lutz.nb.ca/michel-j-boudreau

Michel J. Boudreau
Bilingual Service

Contact Michel: michel@lutz.nb.ca

Admitted to the New Brunswick Bar, 2006

Education:
Université de Moncton (Bachelor of Law)
Université de Moncton (Bachelor of Science, Specialized in Biochemistry)
Université de Moncton (D.S.S. ,Health Sciences Diploma)

Employment:
• Litigation Lawyer- Lutz Parish Gerrish (March 2020 to present)
• Senior Legal Counsel, Enforcement Division– NB Financial and
Consumer Services Commission (August 2018 to present)
• Litigation Lawyer- Canty Lutz Delaquis Grant (May 2012 to July 2018)
• Associate Lawyer- Bingham Law (June 2006 to April 2012)

VOLUNTEER AND OTHER WORK
- New Brunswick Law Society Council – Member for Queens and Kings Counties
- Chair of the New Brunswick Branch of the CBA Privacy and Access Law Section
- LSNB Provincial Libraries Committee member
- Founding member of Carlton Community Centre Inc.
- Instructor at New Brunswick Law Society bar courses
- Guest judge at the Université de Moncton “Plaidoirie en appel” course
- Volunteer with the Hampton Area Chamber of Commerce Christmas parade
- Volunteer with the Children’s Wish Foundation “More Wishes More
Wonders” campaign
- Lecturer at continuing legal education sessions, as well as to
various insurance clients
- Vice Chair of the Economic Development Committee for Hampton




https://www.c21.ca/directory/agents/audrie-beaulieu

Audrie Beaulieu
Owner
CONTACT
Cell: (506) 866-8585
Office: (506) 387-2121
Website: http://audrie-beaulieu.c21.ca
Email: audrie.beaulieu@century21.ca


The Lady may rest assued that I gave Daniel Leger (506 801 8599) a call as well

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 19:01:59 -0400
Subject: Methinks the guy pictured in Moncton and many Maritimers
trying to get by on the old age stipend agree Heath Krevesky is eating
high on the hog N'esy Pas Ernie Steeves?
To: heath.krevesky@tritonlogging.com, checkup@cbc.ca,
Chris.Hall@cbc.ca, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Jenica.Atwin"
<Jenica.Atwin@parl.gc.ca>, "Ginette.PetitpasTaylor"
<Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre"
<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
"John.Williamson"<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, farseno@nb.aibn.com,
tgriordon@nb.aibn.com, association@ajefnb.nb.ca,
serge.rousselle@umoncton.ca, mrichard@lsbnb.ca, lleclerc@lsbnb.ca,
brian.maude@gnb.ca, lrichard@lsbnb.ca, pfrenette@lsbnb.ca,
isabel.lavoiedaigle@gnb.ca, michel.boudreau@fcnb.ca,
lcmarcou@mccain.ca, caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, daniel@jardinelaw.ca,
johnjarvie@rothesay.ca, khamer@unb.ca, carley@lutz.nb.ca,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>

, "Anita.Anand"
<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
"erin.otoole"<erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
"ernie.steeves"<ernie.steeves@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "ian.hanamansing"
<ian.hanamansing@cbc.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, james.mockler@gnb.ca,
cheryl.scholten@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
richard.williams@gnb.ca, michael.marin@unb.ca

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/11/a-20-year-spike-in-inflation-could-put.html


Saturday, 27 November 2021
A 20-year spike in inflation could put the bite on the Trudeau Liberals



https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thehouse/hall-file-inflation-1.6264330



The House
A 20-year spike in inflation could put the bite on the Trudeau Liberals
While the experts say it's not Ottawa's fault, it's still the
government's problem

Chris Hall · CBC News · Posted: Nov 27, 2021 4:00 AM ET


People wearing masks shop at a grocery store in Moncton, N.B., on
Wednesday, September, 22, 2021. (Christopher Katsarov/The Canadian
Press)

Heath Krevesky is a self-confessed political junkie — and a bit of a nerd.

That's his way of explaining why he's been tracking his weekly grocery
bill for years now. And why he's worried that inflation is taking a
bigger and bigger bite out of his food budget.

"In 2019, it cost me $9,826 to feed myself. In 2020, that cost of
feeding myself went to $11,994, an increase of 22 per cent," he said.

"I can't wait to find out how this year wraps itself out. It appears
as though it's going to be close to $14,000 for a single individual to
feed themselves."

Food prices. Gasoline. A meal out. The cost of many everyday items is
going up after inflation hit 4.7 per cent last month — the highest
rate in nearly twenty years.

Heath Krevesky of Nanaimo, B.C. says he's noticed the cost of
groceries rising throughout the pandemic. (Submitted by Heath
Krevesky)

For Krevesky, higher prices means scaling back the menu and adjusting
his tastes.

The resident of Nanaimo on Vancouver Island said he buys less meat
these days, and when he does, he leans to beef ribs rather than steak.

"It's sort of like your poor man's choice of beef, if you will," he
said during an interview for a special segment on inflation airing on
this weekend's edition of CBC's The House.

"Everybody would like to be able to afford a prime rib, you know, on a
semi-regular basis, I cannot afford that ... Ideally, I like to eat a
little bit of beef or chicken, fish, throughout the week, so I get a
balanced diet, but it's becoming increasingly more [expensive]."


16:57What’s causing Canada’s inflation woes?

Shoppers and business owners share their experiences with rising costs
and prices, and a panel of economists offer their perspective on
inflation in Canada. 16:57
Droughts, lockdowns, bottlenecks

It's hard to point to a single factor behind rising prices.

Droughts in Canada and other countries reduced crop yields. The
pandemic reduced production in manufacturing plants as consumers
emerged from lockdowns with money they're both willing and able to
spend.

"What we're seeing around the world is supply chain bottlenecks,"
Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said this week when asked by a
reporter if the Liberals' plan to spend another $100 billion on
post-pandemic programs is to blame for the jump in inflation.

"We are seeing higher energy prices. Energy is a global commodity.
When those prices are higher in one country, they are higher around
the world. We're seeing a basic challenge that shutting down the
world's economy turned out to be a much simpler process than turning
the global economy back on."

But for a government that remains relentlessly focused on what it
likes to call "the middle class and those working hard to join it,"
inflation isn't some abstract economic concept. It's making life less
affordable for those very same people.

Kathy Wainberg is the owner of Pita Ikram. She has two locations,
strictly take-out, in the northwest corner of Toronto. Like many small
restaurateurs, she struggles to hire staff and serve a steady stream
of customers.

Kathy Wainberg stands outside one of Pita Ikram's locations in
Toronto. (Kathy Wainberg / SUBMITTED)

A few months ago, she put up a notice letting customers know the
prices of their favourite shawarma meals were going up by about 20 per
cent.

"Things like oil that we use for frying food have, like, tripled in
price," she told The House. "We waited to raise prices for as long as
we possibly could … but in the restaurant industry, the margins are
razor thin, so we were unable to absorb maybe as much of the costs as
the customer would have liked to have seen."

It's stories like these that make inflation a convenient target for
any opposition politician intent on linking government policy to
rising prices.

Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre has been leading the charge on
inflation for his party. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Conservative finance critic Pierre Poilievre led the opposition charge
this week. He accused the Liberal government of wanton spending,
saying inflation is worse in this country than most other democratic
countries because, like the United States, the Liberals have been
"printing money to pay their bills" instead of controlling spending.

"The cost of government is driving up the cost of living. Almost a
half a trillion dollars of inflationist Liberal deficits mean more
dollars chasing fewer goods, driving higher prices," he said.

Poilievre is one of those politicians who can boil down complicated
issues like fiscal policy into easily-understood soundbites, packaged
with claims that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is entirely out of
touch with Canadians' lives.

"The prime minister says he doesn't think much about monetary policy,"
he said. "That's no surprise. After all, it's 'Justin-flation.'"

    Analysis
    The Conservatives' inflation argument is flawed — but it still might work

    In a fiery speech, O'Toole says Canada is 'drowning in debt and
division' on Trudeau's watch

    U.S. to release 50 million barrels of oil from reserve in move to
bring down prices

But economist Trevor Tombe of the University of Calgary said Poilievre
is stretching the data by suggesting inflation is worse in Canada than
in places like Switzerland.

"I can cherry-pick countries, too. Israel has among the highest rates
of money supply growth in the developed world, but among the lowest
rates of inflation," he said.

"So overall, across all developed economies, there really isn't a
strong relationship between the money supply growth and observed
inflation."

Economist Armine Yalnizian acknowledges the Liberals aren't immune to
the political impact of rising prices, even if the inflation rate now
is more of a short-term spike than a long-term trend.

"Of course the Liberals are vulnerable to people feeling like they're
losing purchasing power," she said.

    Listen to CBC Radio's The House: Bills, bills, bills

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Chris Hall

National Affairs Editor

Chris Hall is the CBC's National Affairs Editor and host of The House
on CBC Radio, based in the Parliamentary Bureau in Ottawa. He began
his reporting career with the Ottawa Citizen, before moving to CBC
Radio in 1992, where he worked as a national radio reporter in
Toronto, Halifax and St. John's. He returned to Ottawa and the Hill in
1998.





https://www.cbc.ca/radio/checkup/can-we-shop-our-way-out-of-the-climate-crisis-1.6247473



Cross Country Checkup·Sunday on Checkup
Can we shop our way out of the climate crisis?
How important is consumer choice? Call us: 1-888-416-8333

CBC Radio · Posted: Nov 13, 2021 12:35 PM ET




Demonstrators walk through Glasgow, Scotland — where COP26 was held —
during the Fridays For Future march on November 5, 2021. (Christopher
Furlong/Getty Images)

Cross Country Checkup1:53:00Can we shop our way out of the climate crisis?

As politicians and negotiators head home, COP26 has come to a close —
but concerns over climate change continue.

Some experts say it's the responsibility of consumers to change their
shopping habits and reduce their carbon footprints. Buying green, they
argue, will encourage the market to shift how products are made

Others, however, say the burden is on government to implement policies
and legislation that mitigate the effects of what we buy on the
planet.

Our question this week: Can we shop our way out of the climate crisis?
How important is consumer choice?

    Why advocates say Canada needs to rev up its electric car adoption

    To help fight climate change, give your shopping habits a
makeover, advocates say

    Bikes took a back seat at COP26. Advocates urge Canada to make
them a priority in its climate plan

    Alberta isn't alone in facing climate challenge, says province's
COP26 representative

    How climate change is causing grief, anxiety and depression

Tell us what you think: Call us at 1-888-416-8333, email us, or find
us on Facebook and Twitter.


BTW Deja Vu Anyone???

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/12/the-liebrano-propaganda-machine-aka-cbc.html

Saturday, 15 December 2018
The LIEBrano Propaganda Machine aka the CBC shows its fat nasty arse
BIGTIME after I sent them an email

FYI After I sent the email found below the LIEbrano Propaganda Machine
deleted all the comments in here and began again.

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/03/taxpayers-hit-with-31m-in-cancellation.html


Saturday, 9 March 2019
Taxpayers hit with $31M in cancellation costs after Higgs stops 4
major projects


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/06/new-provincial-courthouse-to-be-built.html

Wednesday, 30 June 2021
New provincial courthouse to be built in downtown Fredericton


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/11/equal-access-to-justice-threatened-in.html

Saturday, 27 November 2021
Equal access to justice threatened in the Acadian Peninsula, lawyers say


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 18:28:08 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Florian Arseneault Re AJEFNB I just called correct Mr Riordon?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>


---------- Original message ----------
From: Philippe Frenette <PFrenette@lsbnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 18:28:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Florian Arseneault Re AJEFNB I just
called correct Mr Riordon?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Please note that I will be away from the office on November 26, 2021.
I will not have access to my emails during my absence.  I will respond
to all emails as quickly as possible upon my return to the office.
Should this be an emergency please contact Erin Grondin at 458-8540.

Sincerely,

Philippe M. Frenette
Professional Liability Reserve/Fonds de réserve pour la responsabilité
professionnelle
Law Society of  New Brunswick- Barreau du Nouveau-Brunswick
68 rue Avonlea Court
Fredericton, NB E3C 1N8
Telephone/Téléphone: (506) 451-1423
Facsimile/Télécopieur: (506) 451-1420
pfrenette@lsbnb.ca<mailto:pfrenette@lsbnb.ca>

Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential.
It is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed.
If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
e-mail or telephone.
Avis Les informations contenues dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s)
pièce(s) jointe(s), sont confidentielles.  Les informations sont
dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si vous avez reçu ce
courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur par courriel ou
par téléphone.




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Mockler, James (DNRED/MRNDE)"<James.Mockler@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 18:28:09 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Florian Arseneault Re AJEFNB I just
called correct Mr Riordon?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I am currently out of the office. I will gladly respond to your
message upon my return on November 29, 2021.

Je suis présentement absent du bureau. Il me fera plaisirs de
réspondre à votre message dès mon retour le 29 Novembre 2021.

Thank you/merci


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2021 14:26:01 -0400
Subject: Attn Florian Arseneault Re AJEFNB I just called correct Mr Riordon?
To: farseno@nb.aibn.com, tgriordon@nb.aibn.com,
association@ajefnb.nb.ca, serge.rousselle@umoncton.ca,
mrichard@lsbnb.ca, lleclerc@lsbnb.ca, brian.maude@gnb.ca,
lrichard@lsbnb.ca, pfrenette@lsbnb.ca, isabel.lavoiedaigle@gnb.ca,
michel.boudreau@fcnb.ca, lcmarcou@mccain.ca,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, daniel@jardinelaw.ca,
johnjarvie@rothesay.ca, khamer@unb.ca, carley@lutz.nb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
james.mockler@gnb.ca, cheryl.scholten@gnb.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
richard.williams@gnb.ca, michael.marin@unb.ca

Florian Arseneault
Called to the bar: 1991 (NB)
Riordon & Arseneault
300-270 Douglas Ave.
Bathurst, New Brunswick E2A 1M9
Phone: 506-548-8822
Fax: 506-548-5297
Email: farseno@nb.aibn.com

T. Gregory Riordon
Called to the bar: 1989 (NB); Q.C.2012 (NB)
Riordon & Arseneault
300-270 Douglas Ave.
Bathurst, New Brunswick E2A 1M9
Phone: 506-548-8822
Fax: 506-548-5297
Email: tgriordon@nb.aibn.com

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/courts-acadian-peninsula-1.6264309


Equal access to justice threatened in the Acadian Peninsula, lawyers say

Fundamental rights are jeopardized by closures of courthouses in
northeast and elsewhere, groups say

Miriam Lafontaine · CBC News · Posted: Nov 27, 2021 8:00 AM AT


 The New Brunswick government says the closure of the Caraquet
courthouse on Jan. 1 is an attempt to use resources more efficiently.
(René Landry/Radio-Canada)

Lawyers say they're worried about the closure of courthouses underway
in the province for the last 15 years, with the Acadian Peninsula the
latest region to be hit.

This week, the provincial government announced that the courthouse in
Caraquet will close Jan. 1, and its caseload will be transferred to
Bathurst, about 66 kilometres away.

The Tracadie courthouse will become a satellite court, opening only
one day a week.

Lawyers who spoke with Radio-Canada say they have fears about how this
will impact predominantly French-speaking New Brunswickers in the
region, who will be forced to travel farther and face additional costs
as a result.

"It seems we have forgotten that access to justice is a fundamental
right recognized by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms," said attorney
Euclide Lebouthillier, the vice-president of the Association of French
Speaking Jurists of New Brunswick.

This right isn't worth much if citizens don't have the means to
exercise it, Lebouthillier said.

"Inevitably what's going to happen is that people are going to
renounce their rights recognized under the charter," he said.

The two courthouses that deal with criminal cases in provincial court
have been operating on reduced hours since the summer of 2020, the
Department of Justice and Public Safety said in a news release this
week.

There has also been a decrease in the volume of cases in the region
since 2012, the release said.

"These changes will allow us to make the best use of available
resources given the current volume of cases," Justice and Public
Safety Minister Hugh Flemming said in a statement.

"Since the Bathurst courthouse has the capacity to absorb these cases,
making these changes will allow us to relieve workload pressures for
staff and better allocate resources in our court system."

In 2012 ,the Caraquet court saw 1,260 cases but this number had fallen
to 711 in 2020, according to numbers provided by the government. The
Tracadie courthouse saw 1,061 cases in 2012 compared with 478 in 2020.

The Tracadie courthouse has been operating at reduced levels since the
summer of 2020, the province says. (Serge Bouchard/Radio-Canada )

"The target for occupancy per courtroom is 1,200 charges per year,"
said the Justice Department. "It's how the province determines how
many courtrooms are needed per location to accommodate the volume."

The chief judge of the provincial court was consulted about closures,
the province said Wednesday.

    New Fredericton courthouse will cost $60M, Burton courthouse to be
closed by 2025

People on low incomes may be hurt most

Several appearances are often necessary in criminal cases, and the
costs associated are not insignificant, said Marc Richard, the general
director of the Law Society of New Brunswick.

Lawyers charge extra for any additional time they have to spend
travelling, which is why the New Brunswick bar has always promoted an
equal distribution of courts around the province.

"Maybe the person is not guilty, but they want to get rid of the case,
so they decide to plead guilty instead," Richard said.

Low-income New Brunswickers in particular will bear the brunt of the
government's decision to close the courts, the two lawyers said.

These may not own vehicles and will be forced to take more time off
work to get to Bathurst.

The closures could discourage sexual assault victims and women
experiencing domestic violence from coming forward, the two also said.

"The woman, who already is a victim, will only become more victimized
as a result," LeBouthillier said.

Those who would normally contest tickets they believe are unjustified
might also be deterred, he added.

"He will just pay it because it costs too much to go up to Bathurst."

The two lawyers emphasized that it's not just regular citizens who
will be disadvantaged but everyone involved in the justice system.

Marc Richard, the general director of the Law Society of New
Brunswick, says lawyers charge for travelling time, which is why the
bar opposes reducing the number of courthouses around the province.
(Radio-Canada)

Eighty to 85 per cent of all cases in the province go through
provincial courts like the one in Caraquet, LeBouthillier said.

Since the court also deals with many cases involving municipal bylaw
violations, tickets, and violations of laws protecting the environment
and wildlife, police officers and fishing officers that have to
testify in these cases will be forced to travel more often.

"When we send our police officers to Bathurst and then elsewhere, it
is again the taxpayers who will have to pay, and police won't be on
the territory to do the work they are normally paid to do,"
LeBouthillier said.

Administrative staff in the Caraquet courthouse will be forced to move
out of the region once the courthouse closes to keep their jobs, he
added.

"From a social point of view, for the accused it is a loss. But for
society, it entails incredible costs and disorganization."

Lawyers will also be discouraged from establishing themselves in
communities such as Caraquet because they will constantly have to be
on the move to handle their cases.
Numerous closures since 2007

Premier Blaine Higgs's government isn't the first to close
courthouses. The Liberal governments under Brian Gallant and Shawn
Graham started closing courthouses in 2007.

The Graham government closed courthouses in Hampton, Richibucto,
Shediac, Sackville, Dalhousie, Neguac, Doaktown, Perth, Shippagan and
Sussex. The Gallant government closed the Grand Falls and St. Stephen
courthouses.

The Charlotte County courthouse in Saint Andrews closed in 2016.

    Historic courthouse becomes Hampton's new town hall

    St. Stephen courthouse closure prompts protest

LeBouthillier wants to see elected officials in the region fight
against the decision to closures. It's not just Caraquet and Tracadie
that have less access to the justice system, but the entire Acadian
Peninsula, he said.

MLAs in all three opposition parties have criticized the decision.

"Access to justice is a principle part of democracy," Isabelle
Thériault, the Liberal MLA for Carquet, said in an interview with
Radio-Canada.

"The government has just tabled a reform of local governance [under]
the pretext that it wants to develop and give more autonomy, and, a
few days later, it announces it is cutting services in our rural
Francophone, Acadian, and Liberal regions."

With files from Pascal Raiche-Nogue and Alix Villeneuve

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


 https://www.ajefnb.nb.ca/
À PROPOS DE NOUS

Le français, langue de travail et de service

L’Association des juristes d’expression française du Nouveau-Brunswick
Inc. (AJEFNB) est une association à but non lucratif. Créée en 1987,
elle œuvre activement à l’avancement de l’exercice du droit en
français au Nouveau-Brunswick. Forte de ses 200 membres – avocates et
avocats, juges, stagiaires, étudiantes et étudiants – elle occupe une
place de choix sur la scène publique et politique.


Notre mission



Depuis sa création, l’AJEFNB travaille activement à :



    promouvoir et à mettre à la disposition du public des services
juridiques en langue française dans la province du Nouveau-Brunswick
principalement, et au Canada en général.

    mettre à la disposition de ses membres et autres personnes qui
peuvent en avoir besoin des sources de références et du matériel
juridique en langue française.

    promouvoir des services de notariat en langue française.

    servir de porte-parole auprès des autorités législatives et
gouvernementales aux fins d’étendre et d’améliorer les services
juridiques en langue française.

    voir à rendre davantage disponible les services juridiques en
langue française au Nouveau-Brunswick et au Canada en renseignant la
population francophone sur ses droits.


Président : Me Florian ARSENEAULT

Vice-président : Me Euclide LEBOUTHILLIER Secrétaire-Trésorière :  Me
Brigitte OUELLETTE

Péninsule acadienne : Me Harold MICHAUD

Chaleur : Me Mario LANTEIGNE

Restigouche : Me Marilyne ST-LAURENT

Madawaska : Me Monica PLOURDE

Victoria/Carleton : Me Tina LAGACÉ-RIVARD

Fredericton : Me Véronique GUITARD

Fundy : Me Lucia WESTIN

Corps professoral : Me Érik LABELLE EASTAUGH

Assoc. étudiant(e)s : Mme Céleste BRANCH

Services juridiques: M. Yves GOGUEN


 AJEFNB
18, av. Antonine-Maillet
Pavillon Adrien-J.-Cormier
Université de Moncton
Moncton, N.-B. E1A 3E9

506-853-4151
association@ajefnb.nb.ca
© Association des juristes d'expression française du Nouveau-Brunswick.






 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 20:25:24 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Gen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain
this email again correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 16:23:06 -0400
Subject: Attn Gen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain this
email again correct?
To: wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca, art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca,
richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca,
mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca, "erin.otoole"<erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, stalker.mason@hq.nato.int,
"Greta.Bossenmaier"<Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int>,
mcu@justice.gc.ca, ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca,
"blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, MOC@hq.nato.int,
Jenica.Atwin@parl.gc.ca, "elizabeth.may"<elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>,
"Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, Taeyon.Kim@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca,
Daniel.Blaikie@parl.gc.ca, alexandre.boulerice@parl.gc.ca,
Stephane.Bergeron@parl.gc.ca, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "ron.tremblay2"
<ron.tremblay2@gmail.com>

Deja Vu anyone???

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/11/gen-wayne-eyre-named-permanent-chief-of.html

Thursday, 25 November 2021
Gen. Wayne Eyre named permanent chief of defence staff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-ObYj9eVDo&ab_channel=CBCNews

Defence Minister Anita Anand on why Admiral Art McDonald is out as
chief of defence staff
546 views
Nov 25, 2021
CBC News
 2.82M subscribers
'It's necessary to execute your duties in this role in a way that is
over and above simply acting within the bounds of the law,' said
Defence Minister Anita Anand on why Admiral Art McDonald was replaced
Thursday as chief of the defence staff.


 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Anand, Anita - M.P."<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 01:49:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Frank Clegg Did you ever say Hey to your
MP Anita Anand and the Rogers legal team for me???
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out to the office of Anita Anand, Member of
Parliament for Oakville. Please rest assured that your message will be
brought to her attention and we will make every effort to respond
promptly.

For matters related to the Department of National Defence, the
Canadian Armed Forces, or to discuss issues relevant to MP Anand’s
role as the Minister of National Defence, we ask that you email
DND_MND@forces.gc.ca<mailto:DND_MND@forces.gc.ca> directly. Please
note that our priority is to respond to inquiries from Oakville
residents as this email account is connected to our constituency
office in Oakville, ON.

If you have not already included your address and postal code, please
respond to this email with that information.

For direct updates from MP Anand, you may visit the following websites
or sign-up for our email list:
www.twitter.com/AnitaOakville<http://www.twitter.com/AnitaOakville>
www.facebook.com/AnitaOakville<http://www.facebook.com/AnitaOakville>
www.instagram.com/anitaanandoakville<http://www.instagram.com/anitaanandoakville>
Sign up for our email
list<https://parl.us19.list-manage.com/subscribe?u=3925b74881554936d97795c27&id=867d3c2821>
Thank you again for reaching out to the office of Anita Anand.

Sincerely yours,

Office of Anita Anand
Member of Parliament/Députée for Oakville
301 Robinson Street, Oakville, Ontario L6J 1G7
Tel: (905) 338-2008


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 15:16:45 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain
this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
To: candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Coon, David (LEG)"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:43:50 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried
to explain this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in
particular
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. / Merci pour votre courriel.

Due to a high volume of messages that I receive it may take a day or
more for me to respond. / En raison du volume élevé de messages que je
reçois, il se peut que je mette un jour ou plus pour y répondre.

If you are a constituent in need of help, please contact Taeyon Kim at
Taeyon.Kim@gnb.ca or call 506-455-0936. / Si vous êtes un électeur
ayant besoin d'aide, veuillez contacter Taeyon Kim à l'adresse
Taeyon.Kim@gnb.ca ou appelez le 506-455-0936.

For media requests, please call: 506-429-2285. / Pour les demandes des
médias, veuillez appeler au 506-429-2285.

Many thanks / Merci beaucoup,

David Coon
MLA Fredericton South & Leader of the Green Party/
Député deFredericton Sud et chef du Parti Vert



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Manly, Paul - M.P."<Paul.Manly@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:01:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried
to explain this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in
particular
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting me. This is an automated response to confirm
that your message has been received. I welcome comments and questions
from constituents of Nanaimo-Ladysmith.

My staff and I are providing assistance to constituents via email and
by phone. My constituency office in Nanaimo is also open with COVID-19
safety protocols in place. Please call 250-734-6400 if you wish to
make an appointment with a constituency assistant. You may also drop
by the office Tuesdays to Thursdays 10am - 4pm.

My Ottawa office is closed to walk-ins and in-person appointments.

I receive hundreds of emails and letters each week. Emails are
responded to as quickly as possible. Due to the high volume I cannot
respond to every email personally. My staff may respond on my behalf.

My constituents in Nanaimo-Ladysmith are my first priority. Please
include your full name and street address so my team and I will know
you are a constituent. You may also call my constituency office at
250-734-6400.

If you are not a constituent of Nanaimo-Ladysmith, please contact your
MP’s office for assistance. You can enter your postal code here
https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en if you are unsure who represents
you.

Additional resources are listed below.

Thank you once again for contacting me.

Paul Manly
Member of Parliament
Nanaimo-Ladysmith

----------------------------------------
Information & Resources
Government of Canada COVID-19 information portal
https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19.html


Government of British Columbia COVID-19 information portal
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/safety/emergency-preparedness-response-recovery/covid-19-provincial-support


City of Nanaimo COVID-19 information
https://www.nanaimo.ca/city-services/emergency-services/emergency-management/city's-response-to-covid-19


Town of Ladysmith COVID-19 information
https://www.ladysmith.ca/public-safety/public-health/co-vid-19-information


Regional District of Nanaimo COVID-19 information https://www.rdn.bc.ca/pandemic


District of Lantzville COVID-19 information
https://www.lantzville.ca/cms.asp?wpID=800


Islands Trust - Gabriola Island
http://www.islandstrust.bc.ca/islands/local-trust-areas/gabriola/


Island Health COVID-19 Outbreaks and Exposures
https://www.islandhealth.ca/learn-about-health/covid-19/outbreaks-and-exposures


The federal riding of Nanaimo-Ladysmith includes three provincial
ridings. If you are searching for contact information regarding
provincial issues, you can find contact information for your
provincial MLA here<https://www.leg.bc.ca/learn-about-us/members>

Hotlines:
·         Government of Canada COVID-19 Information – 1-833-784-4397
·         B.C. Health Information – 8-1-1
·         Emergency and travel assistance for Canadians abroad – 1-613-996-8855
·         Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) – 1-800-959-2041 or
1-800-959-2019



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:01:13 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain
this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
To: Jenica.Atwin@parl.gc.ca, "elizabeth.may"
<elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "Paul.Manly"<Paul.Manly@parl.gc.ca>,
"Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, MOC@hq.nato.int,
Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bergeron, Stéphane - Député"<Stephane.Bergeron@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:52:33 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and
tried to explain this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in
particular
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Bonjour!


Nous accusons, par la présente, réception de votre message et vous
remercions d’avoir communiqué avec nous.

Le cas échéant, un membre de notre équipe prendra contact avec vous
pour donner suite à votre courriel.

Merci et prenez soin de vous!

Stéphane Bergeron

Député de Montarville


Certaines précautions ont été mises en place au bureau de
circonscription afin d’assurer tant la protection des membres du
personnel que celle des visiteuses et visiteurs. Il sera notamment
nécessaire de se désinfecter les mains et de porter un masque avant
d’entrer dans le bureau. Une fois à l’intérieur, il faudra respecter
les règles de distanciation sociale et demeurer à distance du
plexiglas derrière lequel se trouvera la personne à la réception. Il
est toujours préférable de communiquer avec le bureau par téléphone ou
courriel et, si nécessaire, de prendre préalablement rendez-vous avant
de s’y présenter physiquement.


Si vous avez des symptômes grippaux, nous vous prions de ne pas vous
présenter à notre bureau et de téléphoner au 450 644-4545.


Toutes ces mesures ont pour objectif de contribuer à éviter ou limiter
une recrudescence de la COVID-19. Merci de votre compréhension!



---------- Original message ----------
From: Alexandre.Boulerice@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:26:07 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and
tried to explain this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in
particular
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Bonjour,

Compte tenu de la situation liée au COVID-19, nous prenons les mesures
nécessaires afin de diminuer le risque de propagation. Veuillez noter
que par conséquent, notre délai de réponse risque d'être plus long que
d'habitude.

Pour les dossiers reliés à l'immigration et à l'assurance-emploi, nous
vous contacterons dans les plus brefs délais.

Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension,

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Hello,

Considering the situation linked to COVID-19, we are taking
appropriate steps to decrease the risk of spreading infection. As
such, our response time might be longer than usual.

For files related to immigration and employment insurance, we will
contact you as soon as possible.

Thank you for your understanding,

Équipe du député Alexandre Boulerice
Rosemont-La-Petite-Patrie
514-729-5342
alexandre.boulerice@parl.gc.ca



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Blaikie, Daniel - M.P."<Daniel.Blaikie@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:26:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried
to explain this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in
particular
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for contacting the office of Daniel Blaikie, Member of
Parliament for Elmwood-Transcona. This automated reply is to assure
you that your message has been received by the office and will be
reviewed as soon as possible.

Our physical office remains closed to the general public, but staff
continue to work remotely to assist constituents of Elmwood-Transcona.

Due to the ongoing COVID-19 health crisis, our office has experienced
a dramatic increase in the volume of emails. Please note that our
office will be prioritizing assisting and responding to constituents
in Elmwood-Transcona and correspondence pertaining to Daniel's critic
roles. If your original email did not include your postal code, we
kindly ask that you provide us that information.

We appreciate your understanding.


The Office of Daniel Blaikie, M.P.
Elmwood-Transcona





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:48:08 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain
this email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
To: James.Bezan@parl.gc.ca, randall.garrison@parl.gc.ca,
"Leona.Alleslev"<Leona.Alleslev@parl.gc.ca>, John.Barlow@parl.gc.ca,
Luc.Berthold@parl.gc.ca, "bob.atwin"<bob.atwin@nb.aibn.com>,
"Bob.Zimmer"<Bob.Zimmer@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"<bob.rae@canada.ca>,
Bob.Benzen@parl.gc.ca, Steven.Blaney@parl.gc.ca,
John.Brassard@parl.gc.ca, Michael.Chong@parl.gc.ca,
Michael.Cooper@parl.gc.ca, James.Cumming@parl.gc.ca,
Gerard.Deltell@parl.gc.ca, Eric.Duncan@parl.gc.ca,
Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca, Dave.Epp@parl.gc.ca,
Rosemarie.Falk@parl.gc.ca, Ed.Fast@parl.gc.ca,
Kerry-Lynne.Findlay@parl.gc.ca, Cheryl.Gallant@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "pierre.poilievre"
<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLiVYvRCavs

Here's why Erin O'Toole fired Pierre Poilievre
119,253 views
Feb 11, 2021
Rebel News
1.45M subscribers
Why would Erin O'Toole, the leader of the Conservative Party of
Canada, fire his most popular MP, Pierre Poilievre?
READ MORE ► https://rebelne.ws/2LEk3G2


---------- Original message ----------
From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e
since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament
and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should
finally call me back N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be
reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.

Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre.
Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.

Art McD
He/Him // Il/Lui
Admiral/amiral Art McDonald

Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS)
Canadian Armed Forces
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<mailto:art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca> / Tel: 613-992-5054

Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD)
Forces armées canadiennes
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<mailto:art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca> / Tél: 613-992-5054


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:08:16 -0400
Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when I
was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the Queen
in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should finally call me back
N'esy Pas?
To: art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca,
JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, Ramesh.Sangha@parl.gc.ca,
Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:09 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON
STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Admiral Art McDonald is now the Chief of the Defence Staff, he may be
reached at art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. I will continue to monitor this
account periodically until my retirement from the Canadian Armed
Forces. Please reach out to EA CDS, LCol Richard Jolette at
richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca if you require to get a hold of me.

L'amiral Art McDonald est maintenant le Chef d'état-major de la
Défense, on peut le joindre au art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. Je
continuerai de surveiller ce compte périodiquement jusqu'à ma retraite
des Forces armées canadiennes. Veuillez contacter CdeC CEMD, Lcol
Richard Jolette au richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca si vous avez besoin de
me contacter.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:23 +0000
Subject: RE: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:27 +0000
Subject: RE: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when
I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the
Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should finally call me
back N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e
since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament
and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should
finally call me back N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>


On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:35:27 -0400
> Subject: Re: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>
> Cc: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca, "erin.otoole"<erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
> <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
> "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fifth-estate-military-justice-1.5943931
>
>
> Prosecuting high-ranking officers a 'significant challenge'
>
> "Retired colonel and lawyer Michel Drapeau, who is a leading expert in
> military justice, said he wonders how a court martial could hear a
> case involving Vance or McDonald when no one in the military,
> including judges, would outrank them."
>
> PERHAPS I SHOULD SUE THEM EH???
>
> On 9/23/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Byrne Furlong
>> Press Secretary
>> Office of the Minister of National Defence
>> 613-996-3100
>>
>> Media Relations
>> Department of National Defence
>> 613-996-2353
>> mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:14:23 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, Walter.Semianiw@mdlo.ca, Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Peter Stoffer
>> STRATEGIC ADVISOR
>>
>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>>
>>
>>
>> Mr. Stoffer served as a Member of Parliament for the riding of
>> Sackville-Eastern Shore from 1997 to 2015. During 2011-2015, he served
>> as the Official Opposition Critic for Veterans Affairs.
>>
>> During this time, Mr. Stoffer was honoured with a variety of awards
>> from the environmental, military, provincial and federal communities.
>> He was named Canada’s Parliamentarian of the year 2013, and he
>> received the Veterans Ombudsman award. Mr Stoffer has been knighted
>> into the Order of St. George and has also been knighted by the King of
>> the Netherlands into the Order of Orange Nassau.
>>
>> He is currently volunteering for a variety of veteran organizations.
>> He is also host to a radio show called “Hour of Heroes in Nova Scotia”
>> on Community Radio,  Radio Station 97-5 CIOE-FM, the Voice of the East
>> Coast Music.
>>
>>
>> Colonel-Maître® Michel William Drapeau
>> SENIOR COUNSEL
>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>> Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:43:40 -0300
>> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO
>> dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>> To: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"
>> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, mcu
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca,
>> "Paul.Shuttle"<Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:38:01 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM / SPAM SUSPECT] A little
>> Deja Vu for JONATHAN.VANCE et al
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Good day,
>>
>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>> has not been forwarded.
>>
>> Please forward your email to: stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>>
>> MJS
>>
>>
>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
>>> drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
>>> Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good day,
>>>
>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>>> has not been forwarded.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:35 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>> speech       contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until 23 February 2016. I am unable to
>>> monitor my e-mail during this time. For urgent matters, please contact
>>> my Chief of Staff, BGen Tammy Harris (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), or
>>> my EA, Maj Cedric Aspirault (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca) both of
>>> whom can contact me.
>>>
>>> Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 février 2016. Il ne me sera pas
>>> possible de vérifier mes couriels pendant cette période. En cas
>>> d'urgence, veuillez contacter ma chef d'état major, Bgén Tammy Harris
>>> (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), ou mon CdC, le maj Cédric Aspirault
>>> (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca), ils seront en mesure de me rejoindre.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Chisholm, Jill"<Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:34 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until
>>> Friday, February 26, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently
>>> during this time.  Should you require assistance please contact
>>> Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996.  Otherwise I will be pleased to
>>> respond to your message upon my return.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:46:28 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YOr Ralph Goodale Methinks this should
>>> stress the Integrity of the Globe and Mail and your minions in the
>>> RCMP N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>> Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read
>>> with
>>> care.
>>> However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21,
>>> there may be a delay in processing your email.
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera
>>> lu avec soin.
>>> Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain,
>>> veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le
>>> traitement de votre courriel.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Oreiginal message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:02:10 -0300
>>> Subject: A little Deja Vu for Ralph Goodale and the RCMP before I file
>>> my next lawsuit as promised
>>> To: Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>>> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.cabarbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, "clare.barry"
>>> clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>>> alaina@alainalockhart.ca, info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca,
>>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca,
>>> info@waynelong.ca, matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca,
>>> pat@patfinnigan.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, tj@tjharvey.ca,
>>> karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com, votejohnw@gmail.com,
>>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, Frank.McKenna@td.com, postur@for.is,
>>> postur@fjr.stjr.is, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
>>> Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dave.Young@nbeub.cajfurey@nbpower.com,
>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, postur@irr.is, birgittajoy@gmail.com,
>>> birgitta@this.is>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
>>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
>>> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, Yves.Cote@elections.ca, Greg.Bonnar@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>>> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:14:20 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Butts Here are some more comments
>>> published within CBC that the RCMP and their boss Ralph Goodale should
>>> review ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I am out of the office until Tuesday, October 22nd without access to
>>> this
>>> email.
>>> In my absence, you may contact Mike McNair
>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>) or
>>> Elder Marques
>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>>> Warm regards,
>>> Katie
>>> ______
>>> Bonjour,
>>> Je suis absente du bureau jusqu'au mardi 22 octobre sans accès à mes
>>> courriels.
>>> Durant mon absence, veuillez communiquer avec Mike McNair
>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>) ou
>>> Elder Marques
>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<mailto:elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
>>> Cordialement,
>>> Katie
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Butts, Gerald"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access
>>> to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at
>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.
>>>
>>> Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss
>>> limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez
>>> communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse
>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:30:48 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>
>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>
>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>
>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>
>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Merci
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:15 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>>> Merci!
>>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>>> S?curit? publique Canada
>>> *********
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>>> carefully reviewed.
>>> Thank you!
>>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>>> Public Safety Canada
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>
>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>
>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>
>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>
>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Merci
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
>>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:17 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>>> Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>>> comments.
>>>
>>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>>> commentaires.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:16 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>>
>>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>>>
>>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>>>
>>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>>
>>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>>> press releases.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:53:03 -0400
>>> Subject: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: wrscott@nbpower.com, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
>>> "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca>,
>>> "rick.doucet"<rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Sollows, David (ERD/DER)"
>>> <david.sollows@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
>>> "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca,
>>> "Bill.Fraser"<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "John.Ames"<John.Ames@gnb.ca>,
>>> gerry.lowe@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "art.odonnell"<art.odonnell@nb.aibn.com>,
>>> "jake.stewart"<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, mike.holland@gnb.ca, votejohnw
>>> <votejohnw@gmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
>>> greg.thompson2@gnb.ca, jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca,
>>> jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca,
>>> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
>>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
>>> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, wharrison
>>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> "clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>> "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
>>> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
>>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
>>> JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca,
>>> Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca, Newsroom
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>>> <news@dailygleaner.com>
>>> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, motomaniac333
>>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca,
>>> Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "McGrath, Stephen T"<Stephen.McGrath@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:40:22 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Does anyone recall the email entitled "So
>>> Stephen McGrath if not you then just exactly who sent me this latest
>>> email from your office?"
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your message, however I am no longer at the Department of
>>> Justice, and this email account is not being monitored.
>>>
>>> Please contact Kim Fleming at Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca (phone
>>> 902-424-4023), or Vicky Zinck at Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca (phone
>>> 902-424-4390). Kim and Vicky will be able to redirect you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just
>>> called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit
>>> against Nova Scotia
>>> To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca, Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca,
>>> Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/NSDeputies.html
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/LLLangley-bio.html
>>>
>>> Laura Lee Langley
>>> 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor
>>> One Government Place
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-8940
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0667
>>> Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/just/deputy.asp
>>>
>>> Karen Hudson Q.C.
>>> 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor
>>> Joseph Howe Building
>>> Halifax, NS B3J 3J9
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4223
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0510
>>> Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://novascotia.ca/sns/ceo.asp
>>>
>>> Joanne Munro:
>>> 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South
>>> Maritime Centre
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4089
>>> Fax: (902) 424-5510
>>> Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I
>>> suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown
>>> Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached
>>> to you and your Premier etc.
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>>
>>>
>>> Vertias Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
>>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
>>> contact
>>> with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
>>> Integrity Commissioner
>>>
>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
>>> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
>>> Deschênes. They have two sons.
>>>
>>> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
>>> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
>>> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
>>> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
>>> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
>>> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
>>> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
>>> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
>>> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
>>> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
>>>
>>> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
>>> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
>>>
>>> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
>>> Canada.
>>>
>>> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
>>> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
>>> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
>>> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
>>>
>>> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
>>> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
>>> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
>>> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
>>> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
>>> Registration Act.
>>>
>>> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
>>> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
>>> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
>>> and a response will be forthcoming.
>>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
>>> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
>>> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
>>> Mallory Fowler
>>> Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
>>> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>
>>>
>>> For the public record I knew Birgitta was no better than the people
>>> she bitches about when she refused to discuss the QSLS blog with me
>>> while she was in Canada making her rounds in the Canadain media in
>>> January of 2011.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of  the last two hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>
>>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>
>>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
>>>
>>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>>> Campaign, Rogers TV
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the
>>> 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the
>>> Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain
>>> this lawsuit to you real slow.
>>> To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
>>> "daniel.mchardie"<daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca,
>>> info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca,
>>> matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca,
>>> tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, "Frank.McKenna"
>>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca,
>>> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
,
>>> "dominic.leblanc.a1"<dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca
>, oldmaison
>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>,
>>> "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay"
>>> <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>>
>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>>> are not.
>>>
>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>>
>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>>
>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>>
>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>>
>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>>
>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>>> alive
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>>
>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>>> interesting though
>>>
>>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
>>>
>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>
>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>
>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>>> shy political animal
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
>>>
>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>
>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>
>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>>
>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>> into the US policy.
>>>
>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>
>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>
>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>>
>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>
>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>
>>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>>
>>
>

 

 

 

 

 

Spouse of N.S. mass shooter shows how deadly rampage began in video re-enactment

$
0
0

 
 
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - Lisa Banfield Re-enactment watch along / discussion

2,546 views
Streamed live on Jul 13, 2022
7.55K subscribers
Links: the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova... 
 
Buy 22 Murders by Paul Palango: https://www.amazon.ca/22-Murders-Inve... 

David Amos
Oh Dear
 
 
 
 
 

MCC - DAY 48 - LISA BANFIELD VIDEOS AND LEAF AUSTRALIA

1,362 views
Streamed live on Jul 13, 2022
75DislikeShareClip
3.43K subscribers
LISA'S "RE-ENACTMENT" VIDEO'S: https://masscasualtycommission.ca/fd-... 
PLEASE READ - RE BRENDA Troy Maxwell MCC interview RE Brenda Forbes https://masscasualtycommission.ca/fil... 
JUDE McCULLOCH AND JANEMAREE MAHER REPORT MISOGYNY https://masscasualtycommission.ca/fil...
David Amos
Oh Dear
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS

179 watching now
Started streaming 2 hours ago
3.42K subscribers





the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - Lisa Banfield Re-enactment watch along / discussion

2,546 views
Streamed live on Jul 13, 2022
79DislikeShareThanks
7.55K subscribers
Links: the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova... Buy 22 Murders by Paul Palango: https://www.amazon.ca/22-Murders-Inve... Provide feedback and comments on the episode: nighttimepodcast.com/contact Musical Theme: Noir Toyko by Monty Datta Contact: Website: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com Twitter: https://twitter.com/NightTimePod Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/NightTimePod Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nighttimepod Support the show: https://www.patreon.com/nighttimepodcast



 
 
 
 
 
 

 Tears, anguish — and a walkout — as N.S. mass killer’s wife testifies. 
 
 
 
Video unavailable
This video is private
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 17, 2022

Unlisted

1,120 views
Streamed live 3 hours ago
7.51K subscribers
Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice memo at nighttimepodcast.com/contact 
 
Links: the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova... 
 Buy 22 Murders by Paul Palango: https://www.amazon.ca/22-Murders-Inve... 
Provide feedback and comments on the episode: nighttimepodcast.com/contact 
Musical Theme: Noir Toyko by Monty Datta 
Contact: 
David Amos
Methinks I should save this before it goes "Poof" N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 17, 2022 - Weekly updates (with Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers)

In this double header episode, I'll be joined by both Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers to discuss the past week’s public inquiry hearings, respond to listener voice memos, and discuss recent updates in this ever evolving story.

Listen to the Aftershow  

In this post show discussion I'm joined by Scott MacLeod (brother of Sean MacLeod) and Darrell Currie (Deputy Fire Chief of Onslow Belmont F

 

Episode Links:

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova-scotia-rampage

Join the Nova Scotia Mass Casualty Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/novascotiamasscasualty

Send a tip related to this case: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/contact

Send a voicememo to the show:

nighttimepodcast.com/contact

 

 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: MICHAEL GORMAN <michael.gorman@cbc.ca>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 17:25:48 -0700
Subject: Out of office reply Re: Methinks folks should tune in and
listen to Paul Palango and his all knowing pumpkin before the show
goes "Poof" N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thanks for your email. I'll be away until July 18, 2022. I'll reply to
your message when I'm back in the office. If you need to speak to a
reporter sooner, please contact cbcns@cbc.ca.

--
Michael Gorman
CBC Nova Scotia
902-420-4320 (desk)
@michaeltgorman


 
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - Jan 30th Pre-Show - $13,000,000 SPENT BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING

1,107 views
Premiered Jan 30, 2022
7.51K subscribers
In this pre-show I will review and discuss this CBC article covering the 13,000,000 spent so far on an inquiry that has yet to hold it's first hearing. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-s... 
David Amos
Howcome you have not made this one go "Poof" yet???
 
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Public Editor, The Toronto Star"<publiced@thestar.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:25:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks folks should tune in and listen to
Paul Palango and his all knowing pumpkin before the show goes "Poof"
N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

THANK YOU for contacting the Toronto Star Public Editor's office.

This office handles queries about  accuracy and the Star's
journalistic standards as set out in its Newsroom Policy and
Journalistic Standards Guide

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2011/12/07/toronto_star_newsroom_policy_and_journalistic_standards_guide.html

The public editor's office is staffed Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., by Public Editor Bruce Campion-Smith and Public Editor,
Associate, Maithily Panchalingam.

If you are requesting a correction or questioning journalistic
standards, please send a link or details of where you read the article
you are questioning, (e.g.- date, page number, digital device.) Please
include your full name and a telephone number where we can reach you
for further information if necessary. Unfortunately, due to the volume
of emails we receive, we cannot reply to every email, but we do read
them all, consider carefully the issues raised, and take appropriate
action to attempt to resolve complaints in cases of error or breach of
the Star's standards.

Some messages to the public editor may be published in Bruce
Campion-Smith's public editor column, which explores journalistic
issues raised by readers. Please inform us if you do not want your
message published.

Corrections:  The public editor's office looks into claims of error on
any and all platforms on which the  Star publishes. The Star corrects
significant errors of fact. When we determine a correction is called
for, it will be published as soon as possible; the article will also
be corrected online and a correction appended. Generally, news
corrections are published on page A2 and corrections for other
sections (including Sports, Entertainment and Life)  are published in
those sections. Corrections are also published online:
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/corrections

Because many readers often point out the same error, we cannot notify
each person that we are publishing a correction. As well, because of
the volume of queries we receive, we are not always able to respond to
explain why we determined no correction is necessary. Every query
about a possible error is considered thoroughly however. We  thank all
readers  who take the time to help the Star report accurately.

Unpublishing: Generally, the Star does not delete (unpublish) content
from our websites or archives, except in some rare circumstances
following consultation with the editor-in-chief, managing editor, and
in some cases, legal counsel. In the case of verified errors, we will
correct/update the article and/or append corrections as necessary but
will not remove it from the Star' s digital  publishing record.

General feedback about coverage: If you are writing to express your
view of the Star's coverage, your message will be forwarded to the
appropriate department. Because of the volume of email we receive,
neither the public editor's office, nor the journalists in specific
departments, can respond to every reader comment about the Star's
coverage.

Letters to the Editor: If you want your comments expressing your view
considered for publication as a Letter to the Editor, please resend
your message to lettertoed@thestar.ca<mailto:lettertoed@thestar.ca>.
Letters must include full name, address and all phone numbers of
sender (daytime, evening and cellphone). Street names and phone
numbers will not be published. The Star reserves the right to edit
letters, which typically run 50-150 words. Please note: The Star
receives many more letters than it has  space to print. Due to the
volume, we unfortunately cannot acknowledge every submission.

Submissions to the Star: Commentaries, opinion pieces, story pitches
and press releases should be submitted to the section of the Star to
which they are best suited. A full list of departments is published on
the "Contact Us" page of the Star's website:
https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

How to reach a Star journalist: Most staff members, including
reporters, editors, columnists and photographers, can be reached by
email. In most cases the email address follows this formula (all lower
case, don't type spaces or the plus sign): first initial + last name
@thestar.ca. You can also reach staff in the Editorial department
(newsroom) via phone at 416-869-4300 or fax at 416-869-4328. Editorial
staff members can also be contacted within the department they work
for. To reach a freelance writer, please contact the section in which
his or her article appeared.

Subscriptions/Customer Service: The public editor's office handles
concerns about editorial content only.  For home delivery
subscriptions, delivery problems, billing inquiries and other customer
service matters, please email
circmail@thestar.ca<mailto:circmail@thestar.ca>. You may also go to
our Subscription page<http://www.thestar.com/about/subscribe.html> for
home delivery information.

Further information about how to contact other departments in the Star
can be found here: https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

Thank you for reading your Toronto Star.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fraser, Sean - M.P."<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:25:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks folks should tune in and listen to
Paul Palango and his all knowing pumpkin before the show goes "Poof"
N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your message. This is an automated reply.
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<https://www.facebook.com/SeanFraserMP/photos/a.1628138987467042.1073741829.1627521694195438/2066666113614325/?type=3&theater>
Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter.com/SeanFraserMP>
Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www.instagram.com/seanfrasermp/?hl=en>
www.seanfrasermp.ca<file:///C:
/Users/Savannah%20DeWolfe/Downloads/www.seanfrasermp.ca>
Toll free: 1-844-641-5886
Please be advised that this account is for matters related to Central
Nova. If you live outside of Central Nova and your issue pertains to
immigration, please contact Minister@cic.gc.ca
I am currently receiving an extremely high number of emails.




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 21:25:30 -0300
Subject: Methinks folks should tune in and listen to Paul Palango and
his all knowing pumpkin before the show goes "Poof" N'esy Pas?
To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Sean.Fraser"
<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>,
"mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Moiz.Karimjee"<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>,
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, andrew
<andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "darren.campbell"
<darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Gorman"
<Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, "michael.macdonald"
<michael.macdonald@thecanadianpress.com>, "Rhonda.Brown"
<Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, jesse
<jesse@viafoura.com>, publiced@thestar.ca, newsroom@therecord.com,
stevemckinley@thestar.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pbqoVpBnHQ&ab_channel=NighttimePodcast

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 17, 2022

431 watching now
Started streaming 67 minutes ago
7.5K subscribers
Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice memo at nighttimepodcast.com/contact
 
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 21:12:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andrew Douglas should quit playing dumb ASAP N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. I am out of the office this week, as I am
representing attending the Canadian regional conference of the
Commonwealth Parliamentary Association as well as meetings of the
Commonwealth Women Parliamentarians.

For media requests, please call: 506-429-2285.

---

Merci pour votre courriel. Je suis absente du bureau cette semaine.

Je participe à la Conférence régionale canadienne de l'Association
parlementaire du Commonwealth ainsi que des réunions des Femmes
parlementaires du Commonwealth.

Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez appeler: 506-429-2285.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2022 18:09:44 -0300
Subject: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango and Andrew Douglas
should quit playing dumb ASAP N'esy Pas?
To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
fin"
 

Thursday, 14 July 2022

Spouse of N.S. mass shooter shows how deadly rampage began in video
re-enactment
 
 

Methinks the very lazy corrupt media sheople love to republish Mikey MacDonald's spin on the Mass Casualty Commission Bullshit then polish the turd with their 2 bits worth. Others just use their photos and write their own spin.


Hence they should not complain that I do the same within my Blog in light of the fact I duly notified them of  what I have been up to for many years N'esy Pas?

 

Deja Vu Anyone??

 
 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Public Editor, The Toronto Star"<publiced@thestar.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:21:56 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Paul Manly I guess you have to rely on the lawyers
such as Melanie Joly and Elizbeth May or the RCMP to explain why I
just called
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

THANK YOU for contacting the Toronto Star Public Editor's office.
This office handles queries about  accuracy and the Star's
journalistic standards as set out in its Newsroom Policy and
Journalistic Standards Guide
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2011/12/07/toronto_star_newsroom_policy_and_journalistic_standards_guide.html

The public editor's office is staffed Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., by Public Editor Kathy English and Public Editor, Associate,
Maithily Panchalingam.

If you are requesting a correction or questioning journalistic
standards, please send a link or details of where you read the article
you are questioning, (e.g.- date, page number, digital device.) Please
include your full name and a telephone number where we can reach you
for further information if necessary. Unfortunately, due to the volume
of emails we receive, we cannot reply to every email, but we do read
them all, consider carefully the issues raised, and take appropriate
action to attempt to resolve complaints in cases of error or breach of
the Star's standards.

Some messages to the public editor may be published in Kathy English's
public editor column, which explores journalistic issues raised by
readers. Please inform us if you do not want your message published.

Corrections:  The public editor's office looks into claims of error on
any and all platforms on which the  Star publishes. The Star corrects
significant errors of fact. When we determine a correction is called
for, it will be published as soon as possible; the article will also
be corrected online and a correction appended. Generally, news
corrections are published on page A2 and corrections for other
sections (including Sports, Entertainment and Life)  are published in
those sections. Corrections are also published online:
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/corrections
Because many readers often point out the same error, we cannot notify
each person that we are publishing a correction. As well, because of
the volume of queries we receive, we are not always able to respond to
explain why we determined no correction is necessary. Every query
about a possible error is considered thoroughly however. We  thank all
readers  who take the time to help the Star report accurately.
Unpublishing: Generally, the Star does not delete (unpublish) content
from our websites or archives, except in some rare circumstances
following consultation with the editor-in-chief, managing editor, and
in some cases, legal counsel. In the case of verified errors, we will
correct/update the article and/or append corrections as necessary but
will not remove it from the Star' s digital  publishing record.
General feedback about coverage: If you are writing to express your
view of the Star's coverage, your message will be forwarded to the
appropriate department. Because of the volume of email we receive,
neither the public editor's office, nor the journalists in specific
departments, can respond to every reader comment about the Star's
coverage.
Letters to the Editor: If you want your comments expressing your view
considered for publication as a Letter to the Editor, please resend
your message to lettertoed@thestar.ca<mailto:lettertoed@thestar.ca>.
Letters must include full name, address and all phone numbers of
sender (daytime, evening and cellphone). Street names and phone
numbers will not be published. The Star reserves the right to edit
letters, which typically run 50-150 words. Please note: The Star
receives many more letters than it has  space to print. Due to the
volume, we unfortunately cannot acknowledge every submission.
Submissions to the Star: Commentaries, opinion pieces, story pitches
and press releases should be submitted to the section of the Star to
which they are best suited. A full list of departments is published on
the "Contact Us" page of the Star's website:
https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html
How to reach a Star journalist: Most staff members, including
reporters, editors, columnists and photographers, can be reached by
email. In most cases the email address follows this formula (all lower
case, don't type spaces or the plus sign): first initial + last name
@thestar.ca. You can also reach staff in the Editorial department
(newsroom) via phone at 416-869-4300 or fax at 416-869-4328. Editorial
staff members can also be contacted within the department they work
for. To reach a freelance writer, please contact the section in which
his or her article appeared.
Subscriptions/Customer Service: The public editor's office handles
concerns about editorial content only.  For home delivery
subscriptions, delivery problems, billing inquiries and other customer
service matters, please email
circmail@thestar.ca<mailto:circmail@thestar.ca>. You may also go to
our Subscription page<http://www.thestar.com/about/subscribe.html> for
home delivery information.
Further information about how to contact other departments in the Star
can be found here: https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

Thank you for reading your Toronto Star.
 
 
 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "MEDIA-MÉDIAS (VAC/ACC)"<vac.media-medias.acc@canada.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:28:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: How Ottawa gave up its entitlements to
embrace ethics SWAT teams Yea Right I agree now tell me another one Mr
Egan while allt unethical journalists
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

We have received your request and are working on a response. We will
send you an answer to your query as soon as possible.

Thank you for your interest in Veterans Affairs Canada.

***

Bonjour,

Nous avons bien reçu votre demande. Nous allons préparer une réponse à
vos questions et vous l’envoyer aussitôt que possible.

Nous vous remercions de l’intérêt pour Anciens Combattants Canada.

***

Media Relations | Relations avec les médias
Veterans Affairs Canada | Anciens Combattants Canada
Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
613-992-7468
vac.media-medias.acc@canada.ca<mailto:vac.media-medias.acc@canada.ca>
Check out our Media
Kits<http://www.veterans.gc.ca/eng/news/media-kits>! / Consultez notre
Trousse d’information<http://www.veterans.gc.ca/fra/news/media-kits>!



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Dale, Daniel"<ddale@thestar.ca>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:28:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: How Ottawa gave up its entitlements to
embrace ethics SWAT teams Yea Right I agree now tell me another one Mr
Egan while allt unethical journalists
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Daniel Dale is no longer at the Star. If you have a news tip or press
release, please send them to: city@thestar.ca<mailto:city@thestar.ca>.
Thank you for contacting the Star.
 
 

 
 https://www.thespec.com/ts/news/canada/2022/06/26/canadas-top-mountie-nova-scotias-mass-shooting-probe-and-some-missing-pages-heres-what-we-know-so-far.html
 
 

Canada’s top Mountie, Nova Scotia’s mass shooting probe and some missing pages: Here’s what we know so far

RCMP faced more scrutiny for initially removing pages from subpoenaed documents recording Lucki’s anger at refusal to release details about the guns.

HALIFAX—As controversy swirls around the RCMP, the Liberal government and allegations of interference in the investigation of the worst mass shooting in the country’s history, missing RCMP documentation is the latest development to take centre stage.

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki this week faced accusations that she sought to interfere with the Nova Scotia Mounties’ investigation into the province’s April 2020 massacre, potentially at the behest of then-public safety minister Bill Blair and the Prime Minister’s Office to grease the wheels for upcoming gun control legislation.

Lucki, Blair and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have denied that there was any interference with the Nova Scotia investigation.

On Friday, the RCMP — and the Department of Justice by extension — faced scrutiny for initially removing pages from subpoenaed documents that recorded Lucki’s anger at the Nova Scotia RCMP’s refusal to release details about the guns involved in the shooting. The Nova Scotia Mounties had said doing so would compromise their investigation.

The missing pages, which described Lucki telling a Nova Scotia contingent that she’d promised the public safety minister and the PMO the gun details would be released, were only handed over to the inquiry in May of this year, three months after the RCMP had provided the same documents without those pages.

Here’s what’s happened so far, and what’s likely to happen next.

What’s the controversy exactly?

Days after the mass shooting that saw 22 people killed by a gunman in northern Nova Scotia, there was a meeting between national and Nova Scotia RCMP.

Notes from that meeting, released this week by the public inquiry now reviewing the tragedy, show it included RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki and, from the Nova Scotia side, Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman, the province’s commanding officer; Supt. Darren Campbell; and strategic communications director Lia Scanlan.

RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell discusses the timeline of events and locations of the Nova Scotia shootings at RCMP headquarters in Dartmouth, N.S., on April 24, 2020.

In press briefings to that point, N.S. RCMP had withheld specifics on the weapons used by the gunman, saying that identifying the specific guns would compromise the investigation.

At the meeting, Lucki “was obviously upset” that N.S. RCMP had not released the specifics, Campbell’s handwritten notes indicate.

“The commissioner accused us (me) of disrespecting her by not following her instructions,” his notes said.

At the time, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government was in the process of pushing through an order-in-council that would ban the sale of 1,500 models of assault-style firearms.

Campbell’s notes indicate that when he attempted to explain the reasoning for not releasing this information, Lucki said that “we (the Nova Scotia RCMP) didn’t understand, that this was tied to pending gun control legislation that would make officers and public safer by or through this legislation.”

“The commissioner said that she had promised the Minister of Public Safety and the Prime Minister’s Office that the RCMP (we) would release this information,” wrote Campbell.

In an interview with the Mass Casualty Commission in February of this year, Scanlan also expressed frustration, saying Blair and Trudeau were “weighing in on what we could and could not say” in press briefings.

“That is 100 per cent Minister Blair and the Prime Minister,” she said. “And we have a commissioner that does not push back.”

Why was that bad, if it happened?

The notes from that conference seem to indicate that Lucki was willing to interfere with RCMP operations — the investigation of the mass shooting — to advance a gun-control agenda championed by the Prime Minister’s Office and by the public safety minister at the time, Blair.

Based on Lucki’s comments — as reported by Campbell — it appears that she was taking her marching orders from Blair and from the PMO.

If true, that’s problematic because it compromises the principle of “operational independence,” a central tenet of policing that dictates that politicians should never dictate or direct police operations. In principle, it’s a noble concept; in practice, the definition is somewhat fuzzy.

Lucki said late Tuesday that she would never take action that would jeopardize an investigation. Blair, now the emergency preparedness minister, denied that Lucki had ever promised him that the RCMP would release specific information about the guns. He’s also denied that he told anyone what the RCMP should communicate about their own investigation.

Trudeau, speaking from a Commonwealth summit in Rwanda, said Thursday there was no “undue influence or pressure” put on the RCMP in the days following the mass shooting, and that only police determine what information to release and when.

What position does this leave the RCMP commissioner in?

Lucki’s tenure atop the RCMP has not been without controversy.

In 2020, she drew criticism for saying she had struggled over the definition of systemic racism and its existence in her police force. Shortly thereafter, she changed tack and acknowledged that systemic racism was indeed present in the RCMP, drawing the ire of some members.

That same year, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association filed a lawsuit against her for delaying the release of a civilian watchdog report into RCMP spying on Indigenous and climate advocates. And a series of on-camera incidents sparking allegations of excessive use of force by RCMP officers prompted then-Chief of the Assembly of First Nations Perry Bellegarde to call for her replacement.

Trudeau said this week he still has confidence in Lucki to lead the RCMP. His support echoed that of current public safety minister, Marco Mendicino, and Blair.

What’s the deal with the missing notes?

On June 15, 2021, the Mass Casualty Commission issued a subpoena to the RCMP for its entire investigative file related to the mass shooting.

Eight months later, on Feb. 14, 2022, as part of that file, the RCMP turned over the notes of senior RCMP officers, including Campbell’s handwritten notes covering the period from April 19, 2020 to June 16, 2020. Campbell’s notes covered 132 pages.

Campbell was in the habit of writing the date in large numbers across the page in his notes like this: 2020-04-27.

In those notes turned over by the RCMP in February, his dates jumped from 2020-04-27 to 2020-04-29 — April 27, 2020, to April 29, 2020 — with no April 28 in between.

April 28, 2020 was the date of the conference with Lucki, during which Campbell’s notes reflected Lucki being upset about Campbell not releasing specific information on the guns used in the mass shooting, and noting her saying that she had promised the public safety minister and the PMO that she would do so.

More than three months later, on May 31, 2022, the commission received another batch of documents from the Department of Justice, which again included Campbell’s handwritten notes.

This time the notes numbered 136 pages and included the four pages of Campbell’s notes from the conference with Lucki, dated, as was his habit, with 2020-04-28 written across the page.

“The Commission sought an explanation from the Department of Justice about why four pages were missing from the original disclosure of Supt. Campbell’s notes,” the Mass Casualty Commission’s investigations director, Barbara McLean, said in a statement Friday.

“The Commission is also demanding an explanation for any further material that has been held back from disclosed material for privilege or other review where the fact that this has occurred is not clear on what has been produced to the Commission.

“In short, the Commission is seeking assurance that nothing else has been held back as per direction from subpoenas.”

The RCMP did not respond to a request from the Star seeking an explanation for the missing pages.

What do the victims families’ think?

“Our clients are understandably troubled by what they heard,” Michael Scott of Patterson Law, which represents most of the families of the victims of the shooting, said in a statement this week. “In the days following April 19, 2020, all efforts should have been focused on supporting victims, their families and the active investigation being carried out by local RCMP.

“Interfering in those efforts, to exploit a perceived political opportunity or otherwise, would have been inexcusable. We trust that the Mass Casualty Commission recognizes the importance of determining the truth of these allegations and the need for fulsome cross-examination of the relevant witnesses.”

When will we hear more from the players involved?

Campbell and Lucki are scheduled to appear as witnesses at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry in coming months, as are Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman, the province’s commanding officer at the time, and Chief Supt. Chris Leather, who was the critical incident commander the weekend of the shootings.

But a parliamentary public safety committee has also called upon many of the same players to testify as it digs into the allegations of political interference into the RCMP investigation.

Lucki and Blair are required to appear before the committee no later than July 25, and Campbell and Scanlan are being called as well. Also tapped for testimony before the committee are Bergerman and Leather.

With files from The Canadian Press

SM
Steve McKinley is a Halifax-based reporter for the Star. Follow him on Twitter: @smckinley1
 
 
 
 
https://raymond1212.rssing.com/chan-70058897/all_p19.html
 
 

—–Original Message—–
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:45 AM
Subject: Remember me Mr Travers? Say Hey to Bev Busson for me will ya?
All her cops are ducking me.
Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:30:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: My cell # is 506 434 1379 Stress test my integrity why don't ya?
To: “Travers, Jim” <jtravers@thestar.ca>

What you say is true, that is why I must sue.. We all know why
your fellow haughty snotty Upper Canadian reporters have ignored the
Code of Ethics for journalists for years. The freedom of the press is
a myth. They do what they are told. N'est Pas? However your publicly
held company is in a world of trouble with me.

If you doubt me ask Marie Beyette your company's
Vice-President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to ask the
following dudes about my issues about Tax Fraud Securities Fraud, Bank
Fraud and Murder. Rest assured the RCMP ain't gonna tell you shit.

Theses dudes are your directors and I have already proven many times
that their companies are as crooked as Hell. The Torys oufit was the
most fun of all just ask Lord Conrad Black and his sneaky lawyer Eddy
Greenspan about the doings between me and the corrupt Yankee US
Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald just acrost the 49th from you.

SARABJIT S. MARWAH (He should talk to Deborah Alexander)
Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer, Bank of Nova Scotia

RONALD W. OSBORNE (he should talk to Robert C. Pozen and Jeffery Carp)
Chairman, Sun Life Financial Inc.

THE HON. FRANK IACOBUCCI (He should talk to his partner John Laskin)
Chairman of the Board, Torstar Corporation
Counsel, Torys LLP
Former Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

“Travers, Jim” <jtravers@thestar.ca> wrote:

Your integrity is beyond my purview.

————————–

Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld

—–Original Message—–
From: David Amos
To: Travers, Jim
Sent: Sat Nov 04 09:08:59 2006
Subject: My cell # is 506 434 1379 Stress test my integrity why don't ya?

David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:51:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: Cya'll in Court Johnny Boy
To: premier@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca

David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:57:25 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Cya'l in Court Johnny Boy
To: john.logan@gnb.ca, christina.winsor@gnb.ca

Your assistant Katherine Wilson really pissed me off after a long wait
on hold to talk to you on the phone today. I read the news today and
just shook my head at the nonsense of it all.

Wilson claimed that she was well aware of my matters and that all of
your associates employed as Crown Attorneys have advised me to the
best of your abilities. How can that be? I have not been able to speak
to any of you since I spoke to the crook, Jeff Mockler over two years
ago and that was immediately after I came screaming out of jail in the
USA. I saw red as I read his words to me then. They were obviously
sent when he thought I would never get out of that Yankee jail.

To date I have not received one response in writng let alone speak to
anyone employed by the Crown as legal counsel, Despite the
unbelievable volume of material I have faxed emailed and delivered in
hand and byway of the Canada Post, you all failed to act within the
scope of your employment and certainly do not deserve a raise. In fact
you should all go to jail, not pass go and not allowed to accept even
200, dollars more from the taxpayers of New Brunswick.

The text of the fowarded email I sent last night to you political bosses
and many others says enough about my pending lawsuits.

The Governor General of Canada is the highest authority in Canada
who speaks in the name of the Crown N'est Pas? Well I received that
letter mere days before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA.

Well you can easily see that she affirms over two years ago that I had
done the right thing with regards to provincial law enforcement
authorities just as Deputy Prime Minister Landslide Annie McLellan
had suggested I do before I came back home to New Brunswick to run
for a federal seat in the malevolent 38th Parlaiment.

Wheras you refused to talk to me today Johnny Boy Logan, may I
suggest that you talk to the RCMP or some of your associates
starting with Jeff Mockler. I have had enough of your obvious malice.

I will leave you to wonder as to who else will read my opinion of you
and your legal cohorts in short order. Cya'll in Court.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

“Jan 3rd, 2004

Mr. David R. Amos
143 Alvin Avenue
Milton, MA 02186
U.S.A.

Dear Mr. Amos

Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regardingyour safety.
I apologize for the delay in responding.

If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition,
any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention
since the police are in the best position to evaluate the information
and take action as deemed appropriate.

I trust that this information is satisfactory.

Yours sincerely

A. Anne McLellan”

David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:43:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Fwd: BOOO ya Bastards
To: premier@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca,
greg.byrne@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca,
plee@stu.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca,
DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca, davies.carl@nbpub.com,
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca,
info@pco-bcp.gc.ca

David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:

Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:41:38 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: BOOO ya Bastards
To: jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, spinks08@hotmail.com,
Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca,
mackay01@canada.com,PoliticsNB@hotmail.com,
oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, handsofnothing@yahoo.ca,
gcox@citizenspress.org, stevengerickson@yahoo.com
CC: MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca,
Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca, Cy.LEBLANC@gnb.ca,
Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, Johnw.BETTS@gnb.ca,
saintjohnfundy@hotmail.com, len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com,
william.gould@gnb.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
news@kingscorecord.com

September 11th, 2004

Dear Mr. Amos,

On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson,
I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding
corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded
to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.

I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
Justice of Canada.

You already contacted the various provincial authorities regarding
your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.

Yours sincerely.
Renee Blanchet
Office of the Secretary to the
Governor General

Criminal Code PART IV OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION
OF LAW AND JUSTICE

Corruption and Disobedience 126. (1) Every one who, without
lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing
anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that
it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided
by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for
a term not exceeding two years.(2) Any proceedings in respect of a
contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in
subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance
of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that

Government.R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.),
s. 185(F).

________________________________
Crown lawyers receive help in fight for pay raise
Last Updated: Wednesday, November 1, 2006 | 9:26 AM AT
CBC News <http://www.cbc.ca/news/credit.html>

Lawyers who work for the New Brunswick government say a previously
secret report may help their case for a bigger pay raise.

The lawyers had to go to court to see the report, which proves they're
underpaid, they say. Government lawyers aren't unionized and can't
strike, so have no leverage in asking the government to raise their pay.

Last year, the government commissioned a study of what Crown
lawyers make across the country as part of a review of salaries.

The government wouldn't give the Crown Counsel Association a copy
of the report when it was done, so the association used the Right to
Information Act to take the government to court, and a judge ordered
the report released.

Association president John Logan says the report appears to show
government lawyers here are paid less than their counterparts in
other provinces.

“The association of Crown counsel are reviewing the report and intend
to use it as background information.”

The association is hoping to meet with the new attorney general to
talk about the report, but government spokesperson Christina Winsor
says a good pay plan is already in place.

“The current pay plan for the lawyers is an average of three per cent
a year over four years, and that is consistent and slightly above
inflation rates, which is averaging about two per cent right now.”

Winsor says a new study will be commissioned in 2009 when the
current schedule of pay increases expires
——————————————————————————–

http://www.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf_eng/judges-juges_eng.html

The Honourable John B. Laskin

Justice John B. Laskin practised litigation for more than 30 years in the Toronto office of Torys LLP. In his broad trial and appellate practice, he represented individuals, corporations, governments and their agencies, public institutions, industry associations, public interest groups, and Indigenous organizations. He appeared in the Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Courts, every level of court in Ontario, the courts of seven other provinces and territories, domestic and international arbitrations, and a variety of administrative tribunals.
Justice Laskin is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers and of Litigation Counsel of America, and has been a member of the Ontario Regional Committee of the Supreme Court Advocacy Institute. He has spoken, written and taught frequently on matters of public law and advocacy, and was co-editor of Canadian Charter of Rights Annotated. Before entering private practice, he was a professor in the University of Toronto’s Faculty of Law.
Born in Thunder Bay, Justice Laskin holds a B.A. (with distinction) from York University, an LL.B. (as Gold Medallist) from the University of Toronto, and an LL.M. from the University of California at Berkeley. He is a past President of the University of Toronto Law Alumni Association and was actively involved in the founding of the Faculty of Law at Lakehead University. In 2015, he was awarded the Law Society of Upper Canada’s Law Society Medal, given for outstanding service within the legal profession where the service is in accordance with the highest ideals of the profession.
Justice Laskin was appointed a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal on June 21, 2017.


Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security

of spyware protection.

Here just a couple of the latest examples

 
https://globalnews.ca/news/8992242/wife-of-n-s-mass-killer-lisa-banfield-gabriel-wortman-inquiry-shooting/
 

Wife of N.S. mass killer explains why she didn’t report earlier violence to police

Lisa Banfield struggled to maintain her composure as she described how her partner beat her in 2003 as witnesses looked on, and she offered new details about what happened when her spouse threatened to kill his parents in 2010.

It was the first time she has spoken publicly about her life with the killer, and the inquiry’s decision to spare her from facing cross-examination proved contentious. Lawyers from a firm representing families of 14 of the victims, as well as about 20 of those family members, walked out of the hearing in protest before it ended.

Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission on Friday.
Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan. 

The inquiry has heard Banfield was beaten and badly injured by Gabriel Wortman on the night of April 18, 2020, at the beginning of his shooting rampage that would claim 22 lives. She told investigators that she escaped into the woods and emerged the next morning to tell police that her partner was still at large and driving a vehicle that looked exactly like an RCMP cruiser.

Banfield said she will remain forever haunted by her decision to flee, as she wonders if her spouse might have harmed her and then left others alone.

“I often think would any of those people have died? So that is something that haunts me all the time, because I feel that they weren’t targeted. He was looking for me in the beginning,” she said.

Banfield’s testimony was at times painful and dramatic as she described what happened in June 2010 when Wortman’s uncle alerted Halifax police that his nephew had threatened to kill his parents over a property dispute.

Click to play video: 'Spouse of N.S. mass shooter reveals grim details about their life'  Spouse of N.S. mass shooter reveals grim details about their life

Banfield recalled how the killer had been drinking heavily and fired a bullet into the wall of their home in Dartmouth, N.S., terrifying her. When a Halifax police officer arrived at their door, Banfield admitted she lied when asked about the death threats and whether her spouse owned any weapons.

When commission lawyer Gillian Hnatiw asked why she lied, Banfield sobbed as she explained.

“He had the handgun by the nightstand, and he said. ‘If any police come, I’m shooting,”’ she said. “So, when they asked me that, I didn’t want them to go in, because I didn’t want them
(police) to get hurt.”

When an RCMP officer showed up at the couple’s summer home in Portapique, N.S., after the death threat was reported, Wortman insisted he didn’t own any firearms, aside from an old musket and another antique weapon suspended near the fireplace and “filled with wax,” Banfield testified.

She confirmed that the officer in question was Const. Greg Wiley, who had known Wortman for years and later told investigators that he had visited his Portapique home 16 times.

Hnatiw also asked Banfield about a violent assault at a gathering in Sutherland Lake, north of Portapique. In earlier interviews with the inquiry, she indicated the attack took place in 2001 or 2002, but she confirmed Friday the actual date was 2003.

She testified that when she tried to leave the bush party, Wortman became irate. As the pair drove away in his Jeep, he started punching her, she said.

“And as I was driving back on the back road, he’s yelling at me,” she said as the hearing room fell silent. “He started smacking me in my face. I’m thinking, ‘I’ve never had anybody hit me before … and I’m trying to drive. He just kept whacking me in the head.”

She said she jumped out of the vehicle and ran into the woods. He ran after her and caught her.

“He grabbed by the hair and was punching me, and I’m trying to protect myself,” she said. “I’m screaming. He pulled me out by the road … and then I could see these two (all-terrain vehicles) and their lights were on me. He looked up and he dropped me.”

Banfield said Wortman was later placed in the back of a police cruiser and taken back to their home in Portapique.

Asked why she declined to report the assault to police, Banfield replied: “That’s the first time anybody hit me, and I didn’t want to get anybody in trouble. I just thought, ‘I’m walking away.”’

Click to play video: 'Spouse of N.S. killer to testify in inquiry investigation'  Spouse of N.S. killer to testify in inquiry investigation

Hnatiw also asked Banfield about the early stages of the couple’s relationship, which started in 2001 after they met at a bar in downtown Halifax. Banfield said that on their first date, he showed up with two dozen long-stemmed roses. “I thought that was over the top,” she said.

But later that night, she was impressed by his reaction when his car was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by a young woman. “He approached the two young girls in the vehicle. He was smiling,” she said. “He said, ‘It’s OK.’ He was very calm. I thought, ‘He’s a good guy.”’

Earlier this week, the commission released a document based on evidence provided by Banfield during interviews with the RCMP and the inquiry detailing the killer’s long history of violence toward her. It said she would not face cross-examination, mainly because she could be traumatized by having to relive the violence she endured.

Still, lawyer Michael Scott, whose firm represents families of 14 of the victims, says the decision to limit questioning will leave lingering doubts about Banfield’s testimony.

Nick Beaton, husband of Kristen Beaton, takes a break outside the room as Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people., including Kristen Beaton. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew VaughanNick Beaton, husband of Kristen Beaton, takes a break outside the room as Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people., including Kristen Beaton. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan. 

Michael Scott from the Patterson Law team, representing the majority of families of victims, announces that they are leaving the inquiry as Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew VaughanMichael Scott from the Patterson Law team, representing the majority of families of victims, announces that they are leaving the inquiry as Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan.

Scott, several other lawyers in his firm and about 20 family members the firm represents walked out of the hearing in the afternoon. “We’ve decided with our clients we’ve heard enough and we’ll be leaving for the rest of the day,” he said.

“I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is lying, I don’t know if she’s telling the truth, I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is mistaken, because we don’t have an opportunity to ask her any questions.”

In the afternoon testimony, Hnatiw asked Banfield whether she ever suspected her spouse might harm others, given she knew he owned a mock RCMP cruiser, illegal guns and a stockpile of gas and money.

She replied she regarded it as related to his paranoia about the pandemic. “He was talking crazy, and I would pass it off because I didn’t want to listen to what he was saying,” she said.

During the 13 hours he was at large, the killer fatally shot 22 people, including a pregnant woman and a Mountie. He was shot dead by two Mounties on the morning of April 19, 2020.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 15, 2022.

 

 

https://www.therecord.com/ts/news/canada/2022/07/15/portapique-rampage-shooters-wife-to-testify-today-at-public-inquiry.html?li_source=LI&li_medium=therecord_canada

 

‘I was so scared’: Tears, anguish — and a walkout — as N.S. mass killer’s wife testifies

The gunman’s abusive and violent behaviour toward Lisa Banfield has been documented in previous testimony given to the Mass Casualty Commission, but victims’ lawyers have questions, which they won’t be allowed to ask her at the inquiry.

HALIFAX —Flanked by her sisters, Lisa Banfield took to the podium Friday as the most anticipated witness in the five-month run, thus far, of the inquiry into Nova Scotia’s worst mass shooting.

Her mouth set in a tight line, Banfield put her hand on the Bible and took an oath, beginning her first public appearance since her common-law husband, Gabriel Wortman, killed 22 people and torched several houses in a 13-hour rampage over April 18-19, 2020.

Looking visibly distraught, she faced a full room — some 200 people crowded into the Nova Scotia Ballroom at the Marriott, who had come looking for some kind of insight into killings that shocked the country.

In dramatic and emotional fashion, Banfield told the inquiry of her abuse at the hands of the gunman, of her fear for her safety and that of her family, of his penchant for collecting guns and police paraphernalia, and of the events of April 18, when what was supposed to be the celebration of their 19th anniversary went horribly wrong.

Before that night was out, she had been assaulted and confined in the back of the gunman’s replica RCMP car, from which she managed to escape. The killer, meanwhile, roamed the neighbourhood in Portapique, killing 13 people there before fleeing into the night. The next morning he would begin killing again, before eventually being shot dead by police at a gas station.

For families of victims wanting to know why their loved ones were killed, there was little solace; Banfield, in her only day of testimony, had much guilt, but few answers for them.

“This is what haunts me,” she said, in tears, to the inquiry. “It’s because I feel like he was targeting me and my family. And if I didn’t get out of that car, I often think, ‘Would any of those people have died?’

“That’s something that haunts me all the time, because I feel that they weren’t targeted. That he was looking for me in the beginning.”

Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, is flanked by her sisters Janice Banfield, left, and Maureen Banfield, as she testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry Friday.

Banfield described her escape into the woods surrounding the gunman’s warehouse, eventually crossing to the other side of the road, where she heard two men.

“I looked around because my back was sore, so I found a stick and I propped myself up and I started walking in the direction where I could hear the two guys talking … freaking out,” she said, her voice cracking.

“And as I’m getting closer, the stick broke. So, I dropped to my knees, and there was another log and I thought, ‘I don’t have it in me to crawl over this and try to prop myself up again.

“And then I heard, ‘Hey boys,’ or something. And — ‘bang!’ ‘bang!’ — and then there was nothing. And then I just crawled back to the log and just hid there.”

She was sure, she said, it had been the sound of the gunman killing another of his victims. It’s not clear exactly who that might have been.

“I’m thinking, ‘Should I go see if they’re OK?’ But I was so scared, and I didn’t want to move,” she said, in tears.

At one point, she wondered if she was hallucinating, she said, because she could see the shadow of somebody with a gun that looked like a rifle. She wondered if her mind was playing tricks on her.

She hid there by the log until morning, she said, then went to a neighbour’s house and called the police.

As Friday’s testimony went on, and the questions kept coming, Banfield seemed to become more comfortable, her posture more confident, her voice stronger.

But that confidence gave way when she began to relate some of the abuse she had faced at the hands of the gunman.

Lisa Banfield, spouse of Gabriel Wortman, dons a mask at Nova Scotia provincial court in Dartmouth, N.S., March 9.

When commission counsel Gillian Hnatiw questioned her about the guns that her spouse kept, Banfield said she didn’t think of reporting the weapons to police; that she wasn’t afraid that the gunman would use the guns on others, but that she was afraid that he would use them on her.

“There was a couple of times, where if we had a fight, he’d put the gun to my head to scare me and say that he could blow off my head,” she said tearfully. “So, I was scared. I said, ‘I swear I’m not going to say anything.’”

For all the powerful testimony, there was little new information revealed that had not already been gleaned from Banfield’s previous interviews with the RCMP, and an additional one with the Mass Casualty Commission.

The families of Wortman’s victims left the inquiry en masse in the afternoon, frustrated over what they saw as the inquiry’s inability to unearth the answers they have been seeking.

“We’ve decided with our clients that we’ve heard enough,” said Michael Scott of Patterson Law, which represents most of the victims’ families, during an afternoon break in the proceedings. “We’ll be leaving for the rest of the day.

“Nothing we’ve heard today has allayed any of our concerns about the way Ms. Banfield has been handled,” said Scott. “We haven’t heard any answers to any of the relevant questions about April 2020.”

Most of that frustration stems from the commission’s decision to limit Banfield’s questioning to the commission’s own counsel, rejecting requests from the victims’ families to allow their lawyers to independently cross-examine her. That decision was made in order to avoid further traumatizing Banfield, in line with the inquiry’s trauma-informed approach, according to the commission. Police have said they don’t believe Banfield was involved in the mass killing.

“Right now, what we have is evidence from Ms. Banfield that is entirely untested, some of it’s contradictory, and it leaves us in a position where we don’t know any more today than we did yesterday,” Scott said.

“I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is lying. I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is telling the truth. I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is mistaken, because we don’t have an opportunity to ask her any questions.”

Lawyer Michael Scott, representing the majority of families of victims, announces that they are leaving the inquiry as Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry Friday.

Ryan Farrington, whose mother, Dawn Gulenchyn, and stepfather, Frank Gulenchyn, were killed and their house burned that night in April 2020, had been hoping for some answers about how and why his parents died. He didn’t get them, he said.

“We’re not going to get any answers that we want to know about if our lawyers cannot ask (for) them,” he said. “So, yeah, the process, to me, is flawed. This entire public inquiry is flawed. I think it’s been a big waste of money right from the start.”

A frustrated Scott McLeod, brother of victim Sean McLeod, said he found himself no closer to answers than he was two and a half years ago.

“Why would he have targeted my brother, who was so far out of the way, and start this all over again the second day? What I want to know is, what was it that set him off that bad with my brother?” he asked earlier in the day.

“She’s not going to give us anything extra,” McLeod said of Banfield. “She’s the one witness that should know more than anybody else.

“With the upcoming Mounties (testifying), they’re setting aside two days for each of them. So why wouldn’t you set aside two days for Lisa Banfield?”

Shortly before she left a significantly emptier room than she had entered, Banfield was asked by commission counsel Hnatiw about the psychological impact of the past two and a half years.

“The fact that people would think that we would have anything to do with this … our family feels for all those people and we’re not angry that they’re angry, because, if it was my family, I would feel the same way,” said a tearful Banfield.

“But it’s just angering, because he did this, and I didn’t. And I would never contribute anything like that.

“It’s really hard because it’s scary to think that people are angry and that somebody could come after me or my family if they think that we had anything to do with it.”

The Mass Casualty Commission continues its inquiry Monday.

 
 
Steve McKinley
Halifax Bureau
stevemckinley@thestar.ca
Connect :
Steve McKinley is a reporter in the Star's Halifax bureau.
Location :
Halifax
Reporting Focus:
Generalist
 
 
 
 

About The Waterloo Region Record

Peter Moyer published the first issue of the Berlin Daily News on Feb. 9, 1878. Berlin was Kitchener's name until 1916.

It is to the Daily News that today’s Record sets its daily historical clock. Moyer anticipated his newspaper would run into "rough handling from its very birth." Sometimes he paid his staff in goods shopkeepers left behind to cover advertising bills.

German, English, daily, weekly - Berlin readers were swamped by newspapers in the late 1800s. For about six months in 1896, Berlin had three dailies - the Daily News, the Daily Record and the Daily Telegraph.

Ben Uttley, a teacher-turned-newspaperman, created the Berlin News-Record by merging his Daily Record with Moyer's Daily News in 1897.

There is another important branch to The Record's family tree. John Motz and Friedrich Rittinger published the first issue of a German weekly, The Berliner Journal, on Dec. 29, 1859. The Journal would continue for the next 65 years, outliving almost 20 local and area papers.

By 1919, it was owned by W.J. Motz, John Motz's son, and politician W.D. Euler. That year, they did an extraordinary thing for proprietors of a weekly paper - they bought a daily, Uttley's News Record.

They renamed it the Kitchener Daily Record and published out of 49 King St. W. The Daily Record took over the Daily Telegraph in 1922.

Some important dates in Record history:

• Jan. 7, 1929 -- the Record moved from 49 King St. W. to a new plant at 30 Queen St. N. (the Queen-and-Duke intersection.)

• By coincidence, The Record moved to its current home at 160 King St. E. on Friday - Jan. 7 in 2005.

• 1929, 1948, 1962 and 1973 - the years The Record bought new presses. In 2000, the newspaper closed the presses at Fairway Road. Printing is done on presses in Hamilton, Guelph and Vaughan.

• Dec. 31, 1947 - The Kitchener Daily Record became the Kitchener-Waterloo Record to reflect Waterloo becoming a city. In 1994, the newspaper recognized its region-wide coverage by dropping the cities from its name, becoming simply The Record.

• Jan. 26, 1978 - A huge snowstorm hit southern Ontario and forced The Record to miss getting a paper out for the first time in its history. Delivery trucks couldn't budge. Some Record staffers bunked down at their desks.

• The 1990s - A flurry of ownership changes. Four generations under the Motz family came to an end in 1989 when Southam Inc. bought the paper for $90 million. Southam sold The Record to Sun Media Corp. in 1998. By March 1999, The Record belonged to Torstar Corp.

• Sept. 11, 2001 - The Record published its first extra in 56 years. The occasion was the terrorist attacks in New York City.

• June 3, 2002 - Readers woke up to a morning Record - on a Monday. The Record was the last Canadian paper of its size to make the switch from afternoon to morning publication.

• Aug. 14, 2003 - A blackout swept across southern Ontario. Record employees put together a newspaper using laptop computers and a smidgen of emergency power.

• Jan. 7, 2005 - Record staff bade farewell to 225 Fairway Rd. S., the newspaper's home for 32 years. They moved to King and Scott streets in downtown Kitchener

• March 21, 2008 - The Record becomes the Waterloo Region Record, to better reflect the entire coverage area of this regional newspaper.

• Torstar was acquired in 2020 by Nordstar Capital, an entity owned by Toronto businessmen Jordan Bitove and Paul Rivett.

The Waterloo Region Record welcomes the opportunity to develop strategic partnerships that will contribute to the betterment of our community and promote public engagement, charitable fundraising and social innovation. Our Community Partnerships Program strongly supports collaborative initiatives with engaged citizens and organizations that strive to enhance the vitality of the Waterloo region. We encourage you to browse through our program categories listed below and review our philanthropic practices and goals. 

The Waterloo Region Record and Lyle S. Hallman Foundation Kids to Camp Fund enables children in need of financial assistance to attend a variety of day, overnight, recreational and educational camps, by partially or fully subsidizing camp costs.

We need your help!

Any individual or organization may make a gift to the Waterloo Region Record Kids to Camp Fund. A donation of just $100 can send a child to day camp for an entire week!

The Kids to Camp Fund is administered by our local Community Foundations. You can designate your gift to either the Kitchener and Waterloo Community Foundation’s Kids to Camp Fund or to the Cambridge and North Dumfries Community Foundation’s Kids to Camp Fund.

You can make a donation by mail by sending a cheque to: Kids to Camp Fund c/o Kitchener Waterloo Community Foundation, 260 King Street West - Unit 206 Kitchener, ON N2G 1B6 or Cambridge & North Dumfries Community Foundation, 190 Turnbull Ct., Unit 1B, Cambridge, ON  N1T 1J1. You can also donate online by visiting https://www.kwcf.ca/donate. Tax receipts will be issued for donations of $10 or more. Please ensure that cheques are made out to the Community Foundation of your choice, or note this in the "Special Instructions" box if you are donating online. If this is not noted, the funds will be directed to the Community Foundation that services your address.

If you are a family wishing to access funds for your child this summer, you must contact your camp of choice, who will then apply to the fund on behalf of your child. Camps can apply to the fund through the foundations websites.

For more information on the fund or learn how you can make a gift to the fund please contact Lesley Fitter, Advertising Solutions Manager, 519-895-5687.

 

Back to top

The Record Masthead

Neil Oliver

Chief Executive Officer and President, Metroland

Donna Luelo

Publisher, Waterloo Region Record
V.P. Sales, Torstar Regional Daily Brands

Jim Poling

Editor-in-Chief

David Elliott

Director of Distribution

 

Back to top

Our Journalistic Standards

The Torstar Journalistic Standards Guide provides a comprehensive code of journalistic principles and conduct to guide Waterloo Region Record journalists in their mission to responsibly engage and connect our readers on all platforms with trusted news, information and content.

Here are the general editorial principles that provide the foundation for this guide:

RESPONSIBILITY

The Record has responsibilities to its customers, its clients, its shareholders and its employees. But the operation of a news organization is, above all, a public trust, no less binding because it is not formally conferred. Our overriding responsibility is to the democratic society.

Freedom of expression and of the press must be defended against encroachment from any quarter, public or private. Journalists must ensure that the public’s business is conducted in public. They must be vigilant against all who would exploit the press for selfish purposes.

Journalists who abuse the power of their professional roles for selfish motives or unworthy purposes are faithless to that public trust.

ACCESS

The Record is a forum for the interchange of information and opinion. It should provide for the expression of disparate and conflicting views. It should give expression to the interests of minorities as well as majorities, of the powerless as well as the powerful. 

ACCURACY AND TRUTH

Good faith with the reader is the foundation of ethical and excellent journalism. That good faith rests primarily on the reader’s confidence that what we print is correct. Every effort must be made to ensure that everything published in the Record is accurate, is presented in context, and that all significant sides are presented fairly.

Journalistic integrity demands that significant errors of fact, as well as errors of omission, should be corrected promptly and as prominently and transparently as warranted. 

FAIRNESS

The Record should respect the rights of people involved in the news, be transparent and stand accountable to the public for the fairness and reliability of everything it publishes. Fair news reports provide relevant context, do not omit relevant facts and aim to be honest with readers about what we know and what we do not know. Our core fairness standard demands that any subject of potentially harmful allegations must be given opportunity to respond.

INDEPENDENCE

Independence from those we cover is a key principle of journalistic integrity. We avoid conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts. The Record believes in paying the costs incurred in gathering and publishing news. In circumstances where that may not be possible, we disclose information that could create the perception of a conflict of interest. Transparency with our readers and openness about the potential for conflicts should guide our considerations about real or perceived conflicts.

IMPARTIALITY

To be impartial does not require a news organization to be unquestioning or to refrain from editorial expression. Sound practice, however, demands a clear distinction for readers between news and opinion. All content that contains explicit opinion or personal interpretation should be clearly identified as opinion or analysis, as appropriate.

PRIVACY

Every person has a right to privacy. There are inevitable conflicts between the right to privacy, the public good and the public's right to be informed about the conduct of public affairs. Each case should be judged in the light of common sense and humanity.

 

Back to top

Accuracy and Corrections Policy

Here are some of the core policies included in our Standards Guide:

There can be no compromise with accuracy. Accuracy is our most basic contract with readers and is the responsibility of everyone in our newsrooms. Accuracy is grounded in verification, the essence of journalism. We must check and double-check all the information we publish, including information from all other publications.

Mistakes will happen. When they do, we correct our errors. Corrections serve the reader and they serve the public record. They are essential to building and maintaining trust with our readers. Anyone who becomes aware of a possible error has responsibility for alerting those responsible for corrections in their newsrooms.

Our corrections are guided by the core principles of accountability and transparency. We are accountable to our readers for the accuracy of the information we publish in stories, headlines, photos, cutlines, social media, graphics, data, videos and any other content on all of our platforms. We correct errors of fact in a clear, transparent manner on the platform(s) in which the error was published, as promptly as possible. We make clear to readers the correct information and the context and magnitude of the mistake.

On all of our platforms, it should be clear to readers how to report a possible error. Readers can do so by emailing corrections@therecord.com or, on therecord.com, readers can report possible errors directly on an article page by selecting the "Report an Error" icon.

 

Back to top

Diversity Policy

Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists. Torstar newsrooms aim to reflect the diversity of our communities and respect the human rights and equal dignity of all. We aim for a variety of voices as sources and contributors in our news and opinion.

We seek to foster greater community understanding about ethnicity, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, socio-economic status and physical/mental ability and do not perpetuate hurtful stereotypes.

Generally no reference, direct or indirect, should be made to a person’s race, colour or religion unless it is pertinent to the story.

In the case of a missing person or a criminal suspect at large, there may be justification for identifying race or colour as part of a full description that provides as many details as possible. Avoid vague descriptions that serve no purpose. At times, a group may make race a public issue. In such cases, the person’s race becomes relevant to the news.

Religion is important to the lives of many of our readers. We should not hold up one religion or set of beliefs as superior to another. Do not single out a religion or religious practice for ridicule or stereotyping or use profanities considered offensive to any religions.

We treat men and women equally and respect diverse gender identities, including people who identify as neither male nor female.

Torstar is committed to this same inclusivness and diversity reflective of our communities in its hiring, promotion, development and retention of its staff.

 

Back to top

Anonymity and Confidential Sources

The public interest is best served when news sources are identified by their full names. Torstar journalists are aggressive in pressing sources to put information on the record and seek independently to corroborate off-the-record information.

We do not provide anonymity to those who attack individuals or organizations or engage in speculation — the unattributed cheap shot. People under attack in our publications have the right to know their accusers.

There are times when reporters need confidential sources to serve readers and democracy. Responsible journalism in the public interest often depends on these confidential sources who give journalists information that powerful people seek to keep secret. There are times also when some sources, such as underage or other vulnerable people, may require anonymity in telling their stories.

Torstar journalists must discuss using confidential sources with their department head, and in some cases the newsroom’s most senior editor. They must always reveal the source’s identity to editors, and provide a compelling argument for why the source will not be named in news reports. Senior editors have responsibility to work with reporters to assess the credibility of all sources including confidential sources.

Once any promise is made to grant anonymity, we protect our source, only revealing their identity with that person’s permission.

Published articles must explain why sources have been granted anonymity and why we consider them authoritative and credible. Confidential sources should have first-hand knowledge of the information and this must be conveyed to the reader. We should publish as much information as possible about the source — including why they sought confidentiality — without revealing identity.

The definitions and ground rules for not naming a source must be discussed with sources. Any further promises made or deals brokered with any source must be discussed in advance with senior editors and are subject to the following:

• Composites, where several sources are compiled into one person, are not used. Pseudonyms are used only rarely, with a senior editor’s permission, and must be declared as such in stories.

• The source and the journalist must be clear on what has been agreed to and that agreement must be shared with the department manager. Torstar journalists keep their promises.

 

Back to top

Conflict of Interest

Independence from those we cover is a key principle of journalistic integrity. We avoid conflicts of interest and the appearance of conflicts. In circumstances where that may not be possible, we disclose information that could create the perception of a conflict of interest. Transparency with our readers and openness about the potential for conflicts should guide our considerations about real or perceived conflicts.

These policies apply to all outside interests that could cause our audiences to question the fairness and independence of our journalism.

We seek primarily to ensure that our reporters’ reputations as fair-minded fact-finders are not compromised by public displays of political or partisan views on public issues, nor influenced by personal involvement or personal axe-grinding on issues we cover.

Opinion journalists have greater leeway on these matters, in line with the latitude to express their own views in their work.

All Torstar editorial staff should inform their immediate supervisors of any outside activity that could result in a conflict of interest, or reasonably perceived conflict of interest, that could cause our audiences to question the integrity of our work.

These policies are not intended to restrict the personal lives, interests or expressions of beliefs of Torstar journalists outside their work lives. Rather, as has been established through various arbitration processes across the company, they seek to ensure that any such personal activities and interests do not come into conflict with the public role of our news organizations in any way that could be seen to compromise our editorial independence and integrity.

 

Back to top

News and Opinions

The Record clearly labels content on all platforms to draw a clear line between news and opinion. This glossary provides definitions for various types of news and opinion we publish.

NEWS

News content is verified information based on the impartial reporting of facts, either observed by the reporter or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. News reports do not include the opinion of the author.

News Terms

Analysis: A critical or contextual examination of an important and topical issue based on factual reporting. It provides an explanation of the impact or meaning of news events and draws on the authority and expertise of the writer. Analysis articles do not contain the author’s opinions.

Investigation: In-depth reporting in the public interest that reveals wrongdoing and/or systemic problems, holds those in power accountable and promotes positive change.

OPINION

Opinion articles based are based on personal interpretation and judgment of facts. Opinion journalists have wide latitude to express their own views, subject to standards of taste and laws of libel including views directly contrary to the editorial views of the Record.

Opinion Terms

Editorial: An article that presents a point of view reflecting the news organization's position on an issue of public interest. Editorials are not meant to be a neutral presentation of the facts. They are written by journalists who are expressing the view of the news organization. As an editorial serves to present the company’s voice, there is no individual byline.

Opinion: Articles based on the author’s interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. Opinion articles include columns written by staff and commentary from non-staff contributors. Opinion journalists have wide latitude to express their own views including views directly contrary to the news organization's editorial views, as long as they fall within the boundaries of taste and laws of libel. Columnists should not engage in personal axe-grinding or internecine debates with other columnists who write for either their own or other publications.

Advice: An advice article reflects the opinion of the author, who provides guidance or direction on a topic based on their expertise as well as their personal interpretations and judgments of facts.

Blog: An online journal updated regularly by a journalist or editorial department that supplements news coverage. Blogs are usually informal or conversational in style and may reflect a writer’s opinions, subject to the rights and responsibilities of fair comment.

First person: Narratives exploring an author’s insights, observations or thoughts based on that individual’s personal experience and opinions.

Readers’ letters: A selection of letters by readers expressing a point of view, usually concerning a recently published article or current event.

Review: A critical assessment of the merits of a subject, such as art, film, music, television, food or literature. Reviews are based on the writer’s informed/expert opinion.

 

Back to top

Contact Us

The Waterloo Region Record’s mailing address is: PO Box 25069, Kitchener, ON N2A 4A5

News, Events and Letters

News tips

Do you have a news tip? Or photos for us to consider for publication? Reach out to the news desk via email newsroom@therecord.com or phone 519-895-5602

Letters to the Editor

To submit a Letter to the Editor, please email: letters@therecord.com

Frequently asked questions

How do I subscribe to The Record?

Please click HERE to see our Home Delivery and ePaper subscription page. Already a subscriber? Click HERE to manage your account.

For TheRecord.com Digital Access, click HERE. Click HERE for Frequently Asked Questions about Digital Access. Click HERE to see our Subscription Terms and Conditions.

Is my Waterloo Regional Record digital subscription eligible for the digital news subscription tax credit?

Yes. Individuals who have a digital subscription to therecord.com or the Waterloo Region Record ePaper can claim the digital news subscription tax credit on their personal income tax return for the years 2020 to 2024. This is a non-refundable tax credit for amounts paid by individuals in the year to a qualified Canadian journalism organization (QCJO) for an eligible qualifying subscription. Click HERE to find out more about this tax credit and how to claim it.

I am a home-delivery subscriber. Is my subscription eligible for the digital news subscription tax credit?

Yes. Home delivery subscribers can claim the digital news subscription tax credit on their personal income tax return for the years 2020 through 2024 inclusive. Our home delivery subscriptions include digital access to therecord.com and ePaper edition.

The Canada Revenue Agency has indicated that if a subscription provides access to content of the qualified Canadian journalism organization (QCJO) that is not in digital form (i.e. in print), only the cost of a stand-alone subscription to the digital content of the QCJO can be claimed. The Waterloo Region Record maximum stand-alone digital subscription rate is $7.99 per month. If this maximum stand-alone rate exceeds the monthly price of your print subscription, see the CRA site for guidance on the amount of the eligible expense where there is no comparable stand-alone digital subscription.

To find out more about this tax credit and how to claim it, please visit the Government of Canada website. Please visit the CRA website for a list of qualifying digital news subscriptions. The Waterloo Region Record’s Qualified Canadian Journalism Organization (QCJO) designation number is: Q2438091. To view your subscription payments, visit our Subscriber Login portal and follow the steps below:

1. Login with your email and password (Don’t have an account setup? Create one.)

2. Click on PAYMENTS

3. Click on ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENTS to view your payment history

If you require assistance, please send us an email or call 1-800-210-5210 Note: Subscribers are responsible for ensuring that the amounts they are reporting are correct. Metroland Media Group Ltd. is not responsible for the amount you claim on your taxes

How can I access the E-Paper

Subscribers need to register for an online customer account. Then click HERE and log into the epaper with your ID/password and you'll have continued access while your subscription is active..

What services are offered?

All visitors to TheRecord.com have unrestricted access to classifieds through yourclassifieds.ca/waterlooregion, movie listings, births and obituaries through lifenews.ca, celebrations (anniversary, birthday and wedding announcements), auction listings, job ads through workopolis.com and localwork.ca, Homes Gallery, Wheels, community events and directories, and all news stories.

If you are a non-subscriber, call 519-894-3000 or toll-free 1-800-210-5210 to subscribe to The Record E-Edition for as little as $2.31 per week plus HST (minimum six-month subscription). It may take up to 24 hours to set up your account. The E-Paper is available online daily by 6:30 a.m.

Can I print articles from the newspaper?

All news articles have a link to a printer-friendly version with fewer graphics (to save ink or toner). Click this link, and then print the story page using your browser's printer icon or commands. Printed articles are for personal use only, and not for distribution.

Can I send articles by email?

Yes. You can send a link of the story via email by copying the URL in the address bar and pasting it into the body of an email.

Articles e-mailed between individuals are for personal use only. Distribution to a group or subscriber list would be considered a violation of copyright.

Can I print advertisements?

You can print advertisements you've found in our E-Edition.

What is the Self-Service Account Manager?

A service currently available to our subscribers. It allows you to make changes and inquiries about your subscription. You will be able to check your account balance, make payments, make vacation stops and contact our circulation department for any other questions or concerns you might have. You need to register yourself as a subscriber in order to access the "My Subscription" area of our site.

Can I link to a Record.com news story from my website?

You can link stories from TheRecord.com to your website.

Can I republish Record articles on my website?

Requests to republish material (in any format), which has been written by Record reporters, should be made in writing to Rod Frketich. Please include the article's headline and publication date, the writer's name along with an explanation of how the material will be used.

Can I read the classified ads?

Most Record classified ads are hosted on yourclassifieds.ca/waterlooregion. Items are displayed by postal code making yourclassifieds.ca the perfect solution for buying or selling hard to ship items such as cars, furniture, electronics, computers, pets, sporting goods, antiques, and much more. For employment ads, click here or here.

Can I read the obituaries?

All visitors to TheRecord.com may read obituaries at lifenews.ca. Obituaries published since November 2002 may be purchased in the print archive. Obituaries published prior to November 2002 are not available in electronic form; contact your local public or university library regarding access to The Record on microfilm.

Can I search for display advertisements?

Keyword searching of display advertisements is not available.

Can I search for display advertisements?

Complete editions of The Record, including display advertisements, are available in our E-Edition. You can view the page, just as it was published in the print edition.

Flyers and inserts that are not part of the regular newspaper are not available online, but most can be viewed on save.ca.

Can I print items from the e-edition, like the crossword puzzle, Sudoku or advertisements?

Yes. Once you are logged into the e-edition, click on the printer icon on the top of the page (icons are in red circles). Select the page(s) you want to print. Choose either portrait or landscape. Click on the box beside "High resolution Prints." Click on print. You can use your own printer settings to adjust the size, paper and other print functions.

How do I get a PDF of a page?

PDF stands for portable document format, a technology developed by Adobe. The biggest advantage to using PDF is that it preserves the original look of the document almost exactly -- photos, fonts, graphics and layout all appear as they do in the original. PDFs are not available on TheRecord.com, which uses an e-edition format. To get a PDF, contact 519-894-2250 ext. 772562.

What if I have a problem with delivery of my newspaper?

Missed or damaged newspaper? We want to make it right. Report delivery concerns using the self-service account manager, or call 519-894-3000 to speak to a Record circulation representative.

What if I have trouble logging in or setting up my web account?

Contact us by e-mail at circulation-self-serve@therecord.com, or call 894-3000 to speak to a Record circulation representative.

How can I find my password?

Forgot your password? Simply send us your e-mail address using this form, and we'll send you your password.

How do I submit a letter to the editor?

We welcome letters that are topical and include full name, address and phone number for verification. All letters are edited for clarity, style, and length. Letters delivered by mail or fax require a signature.

Letters can also be submitted online here.

To accommodate the letter volume and range, writers generally are limited to 200 words and one submission in two months. Short letters have more impact.

How do I place a classified ad?

All users have access to our online order forms, which will guide you through the process of placing a classified ad.

Before publication a classified ad representative will call you to confirm the final price including selected options and taxes.

How do I stop and start home delivery?

Going on vacation, or away for a few days? Use the self-service account manager to stop and start delivery, or call 519-894-3000 to speak to a Record circulation representative. If you are a subscriber that goes on vacation for 21 calendar days (includes Sundays) or less than you will continue to be charged your current subscription rate. You will have full access to therecord.com and our replica e-edition. If you are on vacation longer than 21 calendar days (includes Sundays) than you will be credited for the stop.

How can I become a carrier?

For information on how to become a carrier, click HERE.

How do I report a problem with the site?

We welcome your feedback -- comments, suggestions and bug reports. Contact Editor-in-Chief Jim Poling here


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:31:54 -0300
Subject: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of my sister and
her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied receiving this email
To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Sean.Fraser"
<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>,
"mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Moiz.Karimjee"<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>,
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>

However the former Attorney General refused to look on the internet to
verify what I said was true. So I gave up on his bullshit and told him
to answer me in writing because I could easily the lawyer got the
damned email. Lockyer just refused to admit it tis all.

Go Figure Why I brought this up today
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzms5ivv5DE 
 

MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS

179 watching now
Started streaming 2 hours ago
3.42K subscribers 

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:33:54 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.

As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.

If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
Government of Nova Scotia please visit:
http://novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CJane.MacDonald%40novascotia.ca%7Ceeca3674da1940841c1b08da0c273c2c%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637835659900957160%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2BUnVWeFXmCZiYsg7%2F6%2Bw55jn3t3WTeGL9l%2BLp%2BNkqNU%3D&reserved=0>

Thank you,

Premier’s Correspondence Team



---------- Original message ----------
From: James Lockyer <jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:32:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of
my sister and her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied
receiving this email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the Province until July 16. I will respond to your
email as soon as I return.

If your matter is urgent, please contact Kathy Doyle at
kdoyle@lzzdefence.ca or Katie Ray at katie@lzzdefence.ca.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lsbnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:34:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of
my sister and her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied
receiving this email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be absent from the office until August 2, 2022

Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 2 août 2022




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fraser, Sean - M.P."<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:33:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of
my sister and her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied
receiving this email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your message. This is an automated reply.
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<https://www.facebook.com/SeanFraserMP/photos/a.1628138987467042.1073741829.1627521694195438/2066666113614325/?type=3&theater>
Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter.com/SeanFraserMP>
Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www.instagram.com/seanfrasermp/?hl=en>
www.seanfrasermp.ca<file:///C:

/Users/Savannah%20DeWolfe/Downloads/www.seanfrasermp.ca>
Toll free: 1-844-641-5886
Please be advised that this account is for matters related to Central
Nova. If you live outside of Central Nova and your issue pertains to
immigration, please contact Minister@cic.gc.ca
I am currently receiving an extremely high number of emails.
If you are inquiring about Canada’s commitment to welcome vulnerable
Afghan refugees, you can find more information on Canada’s response to
the situation in Afghanistan
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan.html>.
The Government of Canada remains firm in its commitment to welcome
Afghan refugees to Canada, and will be working to increase the number
of eligible refugees to 40,000. This will be done through 2 programs:
1.      A special immigration program for Afghan nationals, and their
families, who assisted the Government of Canada.
You don’t need to currently be in Afghanistan or return to Afghanistan
to be eligible or to have your application processed once you’re able
to apply.
 Find out more about this special immigration
program<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures/immigration-program.html>
2.      A special humanitarian program focused on resettling Afghan
nationals who
·   are outside of Afghanistan
·   don’t have a durable solution in a third country
·   are part of one of the following groups:
·  women leaders
·  human rights
advocates<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures.html#human-rights>
·  persecuted religious or ethnic minorities
·  LGBTI individuals
·  journalists and people who helped Canadian journalists
How to reach us
Contact us using our web
form<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/en/>.Please
don’t send photos or other attachments until we ask you to.
By phone at +1-613-321-4243
·        Available both inside Canada and abroad
·        Monday to Friday, 6:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. (ET)
·        Saturday and Sunday, 6:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. (ET)
·        We’ll accept charges for collect calls or calls with reverse charges
If you or a loved one are a Canadian citizen or PR currently in
Afghanistan, contact Global Affairs Canada’s 24/7 Emergency Watch and
Response Centre ASAP by phone (+1-613-996-8885), email
(sos@international.gc.ca<mailto:sos@international.gc.ca>) or text
(+1-613-686-3658).
If you would like to immigrate to Canada, please click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/come-canada-tool.html>
to learn more.
To inquire about the status of an immigration case,click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application/check-status.html>.
You can also contact your local Member of Parliament for further
assistance. If you don’t know who your Member of Parliament is, you
can find out here, https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
If you have been the victim of fraud or want to report fraudulent
activity, please call the Canada Border Services Agency’s fraud
hotline at 1-888-502-9060.
For other general questions about Canadian immigration, click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/services/immigration-citizenship.html>.
Thank you.
/////
Veuillez noter que je reçois actuellement un nombre extrêmement élevé
de courriels.
Si vous vous renseignez sur l'engagement du Canada à accueillir les
réfugiés afghans vulnérables, vous pouvez trouver plus d'information
sur la réponse du Canada à la situation en Afghanistan
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan.html>.
Le gouvernement du Canada reste ferme dans son engagement à accueillir
des réfugiés afghans au Canada, et s'efforcera d'augmenter le nombre
de réfugiés admissibles à 40 000. Cela se fera par le biais de deux
programmes :
Un programme d'immigration spécial pour les ressortissants afghans, et
leurs familles, qui ont aidé le gouvernement du Canada.
Vous n'avez pas besoin d'être actuellement en Afghanistan ou d'y
retourner pour être admissible ou pour que votre demande soit traitée,
une fois que vous serez en mesure de présenter une demande.
               Pour en savoir plus sur ce programme d'immigration
spécial<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales/programme-immigration.html>
2.     Un programme humanitaire spécial axé sur la réinstallation des
ressortissants afghans qui
·            se trouvent à l'extérieur de l'Afghanistan
·            n’ont pas de solution durable dans un pays tiers
·            font partie de l'un des groupes suivants :
·            femmes leaders,
·            défenseurs des droits de la
personne<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales.html>,
·            minorités religieuses ou ethniques persécutées,
·            personnes LGBTI,
·            journalistes et personnes ayant aidé des journalistes canadiens.
Comment nous joindre
Veuillez communiquer avec nous en utilisant notre formulaire
Web<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/fr/>.
Veuillez ne pas envoyer de photos ou d'autres pièces jointes jusqu'à
ce que nous vous le demandions.
Par téléphone au +1-613-321-4243.
·            Disponible au Canada et à l’étranger.
·            Du lundi au vendredi, de 6 h 30 à 19 h (HE).
·            Samedi et dimanche, de 6 h 30 à 15 h 30 (HE).
·            Nous acceptons les frais pour les appels à frais virés ou
les appels avec inversion des frais.
Si vous ou un de vos proches êtes un citoyen canadien ou un RP
actuellement en Afghanistan, communiquez dès que possible avec le
Centre de veille et d'intervention d'urgence 24/7 d'Affaires mondiales
Canada par téléphone (+1-613-996-8885), par courriel
(sos@international.gc.ca) ou par texto (+1-613-686-3658).
Si vous souhaitez immigrer au Canada, veuillez cliquer
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/immigrer-canada.html>
pour en savoir plus.
Pour vous renseigner sur l'état d'un dossier d'immigration, cliquez
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/demande/verifier-etat.html>.
Vous pouvez également contacter votre député local pour obtenir une
assistance supplémentaire. Si vous ne savez pas qui est votre député,
vous pouvez le découvrir ici, https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr.
Si vous avez été victime d'une fraude ou si vous voulez signaler une
activité frauduleuse, veuillez appeler la ligne d'assistance
téléphonique de l'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada au
1-888-502-9060.
Pour d'autres questions générales sur l'immigration canadienne,
cliquez ici<canada.ca/immigration>.
Merci.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:34:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of
my sister and her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied
receiving this email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:33:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.

 

https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/248955756750224 

 

May be an image of 1 person

 

Save the kids or save the ex-con?
by Paul Palango
https://www.frankmagazine.ca/.../save-the-kids-or-save...
(for subscribers only)

On that terrible night in Portapique, the RCMP faced what on the surface, at least, seemed like a no-brainer of a situation: rescue four children hiding in a basement after their parents had been murdered by Gabriel Wortman, or save a convicted drug trafficker with ties to a Mexican drug cartel and his parents. Save the kids or save the con. An easy choice, you’d think. 

Yet, the RCMP chose to evacuate convicted drug trafficker Peter Griffon and his parents, Alan and Joanne Griffon, an hour or so before attending to the children. The cavalry showed up at the Griffon house at 4 Faris Lane sometime around midnight. 

Meanwhile, since 10:01 p.m. on April 18, four terrified children, two aged 12 and two aged 10, had been on the line with a 911 operator for about two hours, hunkered in the basement of slain school-teacher Lisa McCully’s house at 135 Orchard Beach Drive. Some half a kilometre away from the Griffon residence, as the crow flies...

...Tammy Oliver-McCreadie, the sister of Jolene Oliver, recently was able to gain access to her brother-in-law Aaron Tuck’s cell phone. To her astonishment she found a text from RCMP Constable Wayne (Skipper) Bent to Aaron. It was sent at 1:15 p.m. that Sunday. The Oliver family had been frantically calling the RCMP throughout that day because they couldn’t reach their family members. The RCMP repeatedly told them they were checking. But they hadn’t been. Not in person, anyway. 

The text to Aaron Tuck read: “This is Cst. Bent with the RCMP. Looking for Aaron Tuck to call me ASAP. Important. Thank you.”

The three Tucks couldn’t answer Skipper Bent’s text for obvious reasons. 

Their bodies weren’t found until near 6 p.m. that Sunday, while the Olivers kept calling the RCMP and being stalled by Bent and the new officer in charge Corp. Gerard Rose-Berthiaume.

“I have really no idea why in the %#@& would they text and not walk down the road and check them,” Oliver-McCurdie wrote in a message to Frank. 

“The phones were in the house. Aaron’s was plugged in charging.”

That Saturday night and well into the day on Sunday, the RCMP seemed obsessed with keeping regular members away from nine crime scenes on the lower half of Portapique Beach Road, even after the threat had been neutralized. 

Nobody bothered to do a wellness check on the Tucks, for one small example, until seven hours after Gabriel Wortman’s rampage was finally brought to an end in Enfield..

 

 

 

https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/302030761442723

 

No photo description available.

 
The RCMP, governments and the media have conflated all the killings into a single massacre. This is inaccurate. While Gabriel Wortman is the perpetrator in both massacres, the circumstances of each are decidedly distinct. By treating what happened as one prolonged incident provides both a disservice to the truth and a cover for the RCMP and its government and public enablers.
The first massacre took place on Saturday night April 18, and was contained in the community of Portapique Beach. It appears that no witness to any of the murders was left alive. Portapique resident Andrew MacDonald and his wife, Katie, were shot at by Wortman and escaped. MacDonald told the first arriving officer, Constable Stuart Beselt, that Wortman was dressed as a police officer and was driving a fully marked RCMP vehicle. It is understood that Beselt radioed that information to his base. The Mounties say they had five units in place by 10:35 p.m. or so, but they held their positions. Officers who wanted to go down the road were ordered not to by a corporal who threatened them with the loss of their jobs if they did not obey her. Thirteen people were killed that night: John Zahl and Joanne Thomas, Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn, Greg and Jamie Blair, Lisa McCully, Corrie Ellison, Aaron Tuck, Jolene Oliver, Emily Tuck and Peter and Joy Bond.
Could any of them been saved? Since the Columbine massacre in Colorado in 1999, police forces just about everywhere have recognized that the first officers on the scene of an active shooter must attack the shooter and not wait for specialized tactical officers to arrive on scene. The first responsibility of any law enforcement officer in a critical situation is preservation of life. Why did the RCMP not pursue Wortman when they were told where he was by MacDonald?

The second massacre occurred on the morning of April 19, and was spread out over a wide swath of Northern and Central Nova Scotia. A key thing to note is that the RCMP sent its officers home from Portapique around 6:30 a.m. after it was assumed that Wortman had committed suicide. Who made that assumption?
When daylight arrived, the bodies of Corrie Ellison and Lisa McCully were still lying by the road on Orchard Beach Drive. At least five bodies — the three Tucks and the two Bonds — wouldn’t be found until later that day. The police had no idea where Wortman was. Eventually, the police said that he likely spent the night behind a welding shop of Ventura Drive in Debert, but we still don’t really know that. It’s another assumption.
That morning, Wortman travelled 50 kilometres to Hunter Road in Wentworth, where he killed corrections officers Sean McLeod and Alanna Jenkins before setting their house on fire. He killed Good Samaritan neighbour, Tom Bagley, who came to check out what was going on. He then drove back toward Portapique and killed Lillian Hyslop on Highway 4. He eluded the RCMP near Glenholme, tried to gain entry into another residence, and then killed VON nurses Kristin Beaton and Heather O’Brien on Plains Road in Debert.
Wortman then headed south, where he shot and wounded Constable Chad Morrison and killed Constable Heidi Stevenson at Shubenacadie. At that scene he coldly executed Joey Webber, another Good Samaritan. He set his fake police car on fire with Webber in the back seat, and escaped in Webber’s Ford Escape. He stopped about a kilometre away at fellow denturist Gina Goulet’s house, killed her and stole her vehicle.
In all Wortman drove an estimated 200 kilometres. The RCMP did not set up a roadblock in front of him. Why?

One year after Portapique: On shifting timelines, evidence destruction, incompetence and unanswered questions, by Paul Palango
https://www.frankmagazine.ca/.../one-year-after-portapique
(for subscribers only)
See less

 

https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/312155487096917

 

No photo description available.

 

A hearty Frankland congratulations to Darryl MacDonald, Commander of the RCMP PEI Operational Communication Centre, named by the RCMP last week as the force's OCC Commander of the Year.
The Mounties hand out the awards every year in mid-April.
Fortuitous timing indeed for last year's winner, Glen Byrne!

 

https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/316306080015191 

 

May be an image of one or more people and text

 

Remember last April when the RCMP held four decidedly weird press conferences during which Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman, Chief Superintendent Chris Leather and Superintendent Darren Campbell all embarrassed themselves? Caught lurking behind the scenes at Campbell’s press conference on April 28 was an RCMP civilian employee named Alex Vass.
He is a former journalist who had spent almost 30 years working as a radio and television reporter in New Brunswick, the last 16 of them with the CTV network. In April 2005, Vass went to work for the Mounties in their strategic communications department. By 2020, he was a senior crisis and communications strategist in the force, “using traditional and social media to meet business goals or in other words using communications to solve and prevent crime,” as he so awkwardly states in his own LinkedIn profile.
Vass brought added value to the RCMP mainly because he had a pipeline back to his former comrades in the CTV newsroom, where he could deftly wield influence from behind the scenes and keep the CTV newsroom tame when it came to stories potentially harmful to the RCMP’s reputation.
There was another part of Vass’s back story that shed light on why the RCMP had put so much of its faith in Twitter and Facebook and why it continued to defend that mystifying decision. Leather memorably called the platform “a superior way to communicate this ongoing threat” and said he was “satisfied with the messaging.”
Vass was the key person inside the RCMP who was instrumental in convincing the force to use social media in a crisis and who was working behind the scenes to manage the force’s response to the growing criticism of the practise...

HOW THE MOUNTIES GOT ADDICTED TO TWITTER, by Paul Palango
https://www.frankmagazine.ca/.../how-the-mounties-got...
(for subscribers only)
See less

 

 

https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/319290883050044 

 

May be an image of 2 people

 

May 1, 2021

 
In which journo Paul Palango breaks in his new Frank hat during a recent episode of Nighttime: Canadian Crime, Mysteries, and the Weird
Sez host Jordan Bonaparte:
"I've gotta get me one of those. I'll go get my face punched in downtown with that hat on".
"I'd welcome it," declares the noted contrarian with an impish grin.
Palango's been a regular guest on Nighttime for months, where he talks at length about his ongoing investigation into last year's mass shootings.
He's back on the show tomorrow night, May 2, 10:15 N.S. time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VkD0oe-aEE

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngUK7665Fik 

 

12) N.D.A.s - Derpmergency Alert

603 views
Premiered Jan 23, 2022
175 subscribers
Big Fun Garage Back-Up Channel on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-1347083 12) N.D.A.s - Big Fun Garage (Rumble Link): https://rumble.com/vt2y06-january-22-...

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xojo_wUfW4o 

 

MCC Day 48 – Lisa Banfield Speaks

628 views
Jul 15, 2022
651 subscribers
Today, more than two years after the Nova Scotia mass shooting, the common law spouse of the killer has finally spoken in public, as she gave evidence in the Mass Casualty Commission proceedings. Lisa Banfield spent 19 years with Gabriel Wortman before he went on a rampage and killed 22 people over the course of 13 hours on April 18-19, 2020. It is difficult to know what to make of Ms. Banfield. She has had two years to prepare her answers, considerable preparation time and help from her high-profile lawyer, and the benefit of knowing everyone else’s versions of events before having to give evidence. On the other hand, multiple other witnesses have confirmed her accounts of having been the victim of domestic violence over an extended period of time. On yet another hand, she had no children to protect, and seemed to be enjoying a comfortable lifestyle built on criminal activity of which she must have been well aware, and now has a clear financial interest in denying knowledge of those criminal activities as she tries to retain entitlement to Gabriel Wortman’s estate.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzms5ivv5DE 

 

MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS

2,695 views
Streamed live

3.42K subscribers
 

15  Comments

 

Methinks at 4 hours 1 minute you dudes jerked the wrong old dog's chain again N'esy Pas? 
 
 "David Amos​Methinks Agent Margaritaville loves to play the wicked game N'esy Pas?" 
 
"SadMafioso​ @David Amos Je Nas Comprend Pas".

 

 
Joanne Willoughby
I wish I could see the “live chat”, I was interested to see what everyone thought of this today!
 
David Amos
Go to my blog     DELETED
 
Live chat is there now, Joanne.
 
Joanne Willoughby
 @Little Grey Cells 😊Also I truly Thank You for the shirts, that was very kind of You. When standing in line at Tim’s waiting for coffee yesterday on My way home, I was asked about My shirt. I had a nice chat with a young woman and gave her the name of your channel and told her to check it out IF she would like to have her eyes VERY WIDE OPEN! I hope she looks into it, the more people who get behind the truth the better. Take Care and Thank You for everything that You do ❤God Bless the 23 🙏🏻and their families 💕
 
 
 
Nosy Scotian
Shawn Banfield learned to barber in the clink. Owned G spot. Cuts in the front. Powders in the back. Nephew or cousin not sure to Lisa
 
Moshpit70
Damn Dude, The YT blocked your replay chat comments. I learned so much from your followers. Glad you're still working towards truth. Thanks Seamus, Chat.
 
Maureen Weeres
LB scared of Gabes threats with guns but not concerned about where he stored them!
 
 
 
Tony K
I have been watching most days...they swear/affirm them at beginning and at times Commissioner MacDonald would sometimes say to a witness you are still under oath when they return from lunch or long breaks....but not done consistently. I have never seen them swear them in again after breaks...unless next day continuation. Is all the other 50 days of testimony now invalid? Need one of the 30-50 lawyers present to intervene or are they considered still under oath?
 
Doreen Stokdijk
Notice how she says Gabrial in a nice way and then says sorry, G. Hmm
 
Scott Clark
how do they all keep the RBF for so long
 
 
tinycha0s
Has anyone seen the article about that dentist who got that contract with the prison systems? wonder if that’s got anything to do with this….?
 
 
 
Lynn M
Was she whispering something to her sister around the 59:00 min mark? Anyone hear it ?
 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/partner-of-n-s-gunman-set-to-testify-at-mass-shooting-inquiry-1.6520854

 

Partner of N.S. mass shooter tells inquiry why she didn't report illegal guns

Lawyers of victims’ families concerned about lack of ability to ask questions

The partner of the gunman who killed 22 people in the Nova Scotia mass shooting says she knew he didn't have a gun licence, but was scared he would kill her if she ever reported him to police.

Lisa Banfield testified Friday before the Mass Casualty Commission leading a public inquiry into the rampage on April 18 and 19, 2020, when her common-law spouse, Gabriel Wortman, killed neighbours and strangers as he drove a mock RCMP cruiser.

Banfield, who was only questioned by commission counsel, was composed for the first few hours of the day as she testified with two of her sisters by her side.

She became emotional when talking about the various firearms the gunman owned. Banfield said she never considered reporting her common-law spouse to the police, even though she knew he didn't have a licence.

"If we had a fight, he put the gun to my head to scare me and said he could blow off my head," Banfield said through tears.

"So I was scared. I'm not going to say anything."

Banfield said she was aware other men also knew Wortman had these guns and were afraid to say anything, "so what am I gonna do?"

Wanted to protect police from gunman

She was also asked about what happened when two Halifax Regional Police officers arrived at the Dartmouth home she shared with the gunman in June 2010, investigating reports that he had threatened to kill his parents.

At the time, Banfield told officers there were no guns in the house. She testified Friday that wasn't true, but she said she lied to protect the officers.

"[Wortman] had the handgun by the nightstand and said if any police come, 'I'm shooting,'" Banfield said. 

Soon after this, Banfield said RCMP Const. Greg Wiley came by the Portapique cottage to see whether Wortman had any firearms. 

Wiley in house for 10 minutes: Banfield

The inquiry has heard that Wiley visited the gunman's cottage more than a dozen times in the years before the mass shooting, since the officer went to him for tips on local crime.

During that 2010 visit, Banfield said Wiley asked Wortman if he had any guns. The gunman showed the Mountie an old musket and one decorative gun above a fireplace that was filled with wax.

Wiley was only in the cottage for about 10 minutes and didn't seem to take an official statement from the gunman, nor did he search the home, said Banfield.

She couldn't remember if Wiley visited the gunman's warehouse or if it had been built by then.

The Portapique, N.S. log cottage belonging to the Nova Scotia mass shooter. The building, and nearby warehouse, were burned to the ground during the April 2020 rampage. (Mass Casualty Commission)

The gunman began his rampage on April 18, 2020, after attacking Banfield during a celebration of their 19th anniversary. The gunman's long history of violence, emotional abuse and other controlling behaviour toward Banfield was outlined in a foundational document released earlier this week. 

Although Banfield's lawyer James Lockyer said she was apprehensive about testifying, due to revisiting of the trauma from her past, she chose to give her evidence in person rather than via video.

"She's showing, you know, a lot of courage there in my view, and she's going to do her best," Lockyer said Thursday.

As of Friday, Banfield has completed four interviews with police since the massacre, a video walk-through of her experience on April 18 and 19 in Portapique, N.S., and five recent interviews with the commission itself. 

Soon after the video walk-through in October 2020, the RCMP charged Banfield with supplying ammunition to the gunman and she stopped cooperating with police. Banfield also, under her lawyer's advice, initially refused to speak at the inquiry. That stance changed when her charge was referred to restorative justice in March.

According to a commission release, the decision to not allow questions from other participant lawyers is based on the volume of information Banfield has already provided, and her position as a "survivor of the perpetrator's violence."

Gillian Hnatiw, commission counsel, said earlier this week that while there may be "follow-up questions" put to Banfield on Friday about the shootings, their team will not be asking her to retell that story.

Michael Scott of Patterson Law, the firm representing the families of most victims, said they were "shocked" to hear that.

Scott said their clients already had significant concerns with the commission blocking direct cross-examination. He is not planning to submit any written questions for the commission to consider.

Scott said there is "absolutely no point" in having Banfield give sworn testimony in person under the conditions the commission has laid out.

Michael Scott is a lawyer with Patterson Law, whose firm represents more than a dozen families of Portapique victims. (CBC)

"We can be forgiven for concluding that Ms. Banfield has been called forward for no other reason than ... it can be said that she was called," Scott said Thursday.

He added that the commission's trauma-informed mandate would have been better served by having Banfield testify once in person, and not sit through multiple lengthy interviews behind closed doors.

If this process had been done the "proper way" and questions allowed from various lawyers, Scott said Banfield would have been allowed the opportunity to speak her piece. But as it stands, Scott said there will still be major questions around Banfield after she testifies Friday, and "speculation about what actually happened."

When asked what else the commission is hoping to learn from Banfield, one of their lawyers Emily Hill told reporters Thursday that there are multiple issues, including the history of the gunman's abuse in their relationship. Hill also said they do have questions for her as a witness to how the events of April 18 unfolded.

Banfield has told police how the gunman assaulted her before throwing her into the mock RCMP car in his Portapique garage. She said she escaped through an opening in the car's divider, and hid in the woods overnight.

Lockyer said he's glad that the commission will not allow questions from participant lawyers which may be driven by a "conspiracy theory" that Banfield actually didn't spend the night outside in the woods.

James Lockyer is a lawyer for Lisa Banfield, the partner of the mass shooter who killed 22 people in April 2020 across Nova Scotia. (CBC)

This type of question "takes us to south of the border," Lockyer said Thursday.

"You know, these shootings happen south of the border and the next thing we hear from the Alex Joneses of this world is that the shooting never actually happened, it's completely phony and was made up," Lockyer said.

"We don't need that kind of nonsense in Canada or in Nova Scotia."

Lockyer said Banfield is aware victims' families will be in the room Friday, and that's one of the reasons she wants to come in person. Banfield never knew the massacre was coming, Lockyer said, and every day thinks about what would have happened if she hadn't fled on April 18.

"She's going to think about that every day for the rest of her life. That's a difficult thing to carry, a very heavy burden to carry," Lockyer said.

"She just hopes that … she's going to be to tell them, as best she can, that she just wishes it never happened."

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

Although Patterson Law filed a motion asking for detailed reasons on the commission's approach, the commission released a decision dismissing this motion Thursday.

The commissioners said they have explained fully why Banfield is only being questioned by their own counsel, who are tasked to find answers in the public interest, and "not in the adversarial, trial-like model" on which the motion was based.

The commission also dismissed Patterson's request to give an oral submission about Banfield's testimony Friday.

This is not the first time the issue of lack of direct questioning has been raised by victims' families and their lawyers. In May, the commissioners decided that only their lawyers would question RCMP Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill and Sgt. Andy O'Brien in pre-taped interviews. Rehill was in charge of the police response during the first hours after 911 calls began to come in. O'Brien helped communicate with officers at the crime scene early in the crisis.

This drew a temporary boycott of the inquiry by many victims' families, who did not show up during the Mounties' testimonies and instructed their lawyers to do the same.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Haley Ryan

Reporter

Haley Ryan is a reporter based in Halifax. Got a story idea? Send an email to haley.ryan@cbc.ca, or reach out on Twitter @hkryan17.

With files from Catharine Tunney

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|

 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/lisa-banfield-mass-shooting-portapique-video-reenactment-1.6519111

 

Spouse of N.S. mass shooter shows how deadly rampage began in video re-enactment

Lisa Banfield told police what she could remember about Portapique events months later

Warning: This story contains details of violence and domestic abuse that are disturbing.

New videos show the long-time partner of the Nova Scotia mass shooter re-enacting what she saw and experienced the night the rampage began two years ago.

The Mass Casualty Commission released new documents and images Wednesday as part of its inquiry into what happened on April 18 and 19, 2020, when Gabriel Wortman killed 22 people while driving a mock RCMP car.

Among these are video re-enactments from October 2020, when Lisa Banfield took an RCMP investigator through what she remembers happened in Portapique.

Banfield said the night began with the couple celebrating their 19th anniversary and having drinks at the gunman's large garage next to his cottage. They were video chatting with friends in the United States and talking about how they planned to hold a commitment ceremony the next year. That's when their friend Angel Patterson said, "Don't do it." That upset Banfield and she left the garage. 

Halfway up the path to the cottage, Banfield said she decided to turn around and apologize to Wortman, but when she arrived he was already "irate." She told the commission she couldn't calm him down, and went back to the cottage and into bed.

What seemed like minutes later, Banfield said the gunman pulled the covers off the bed and assaulted her, kicking her into the bedpost. He then pulled her through the cottage which she noticed was already doused in gasoline, and set the building on fire once they got outside.

She then told police about the gunman leading her through the woods to the garage.

N.S. gunman’s eyes were ‘just so cold,’ says former common-law spouse

21 hours ago
Duration 0:54
New videos show Lisa Banfield, the long-time partner of the Nova Scotia mass shooter re-enacting what she saw and experienced the night the rampage began two years ago.

Once at the garage, the gunman started dousing the vehicles outside with gas. He dragged Banfield into the garage, and handcuffed her left hand. 

But when he demanded her right hand, Banfield said she held it back.

N.S. gunman’s ex describes what she thought would be her last moments before being shot

21 hours ago
Duration 1:16
Lisa Banfield remembers the tense moments she pleaded for her life.

When she was in the back seat of the mock RCMP cruiser behind the plexiglass partition, Banfield said the gunman loaded several firearms into the front of the vehicle.

He then went up to the loft apartment in the garage, and she tried to kick out the back seat windows with no success.

She managed to slip the handcuff off her left hand and was able to slide open a window in the divider and dive into the front seat. She ran from the garage, not taking any of the guns in the cruiser —  something she told police she has replayed over in her head.

N.S. gunman’s former common-law partner laments over being paralyzed by fear

21 hours ago
Duration 0:24
Lisa Banfield reenacts what she saw and experienced the night the rampage began two years ago.

After running from the garage, Banfield tried to hide in one of his trucks but was worried he would set it on fire, and fled into the woods.

Banfield told police how she spent the next few hours alone, hearing gunshots and terrified the gunman would find her. 

Lisa Banfield describes the sounds she could hear coming from beyond the woods she hid in

21 hours ago
Duration 3:29
The former common-law partner of the Nova Scotia mass shooter describes in her own words what she could hear while hiding in the dark woods in Portapique, N.S.

While Banfield was in hiding, the gunman killed 13 people within the small community.

She remained hidden inside a fallen tree overnight as temperatures dipped close to zero degrees, inquiry documents said.

Banfield said she thought if she could survive until dawn, she could then venture out for help.

‘Lisa, just do it.’ How the N.S. gunman’s ex eventually found help

21 hours ago
Duration 1:22
Terrified and in pain, Lisa Banfield describes how and when she emerged from her hiding place in the Portapique, N.S., woods

After first light, she walked to a neighbour who called police just before 6:30 a.m. on April 19. Members of the RCMP's emergency response team picked her up in an armoured vehicle a few minutes later.

Medical records released through the inquiry show Banfield spent five nights in hospital after suffering a fractured rib and vertebrae, as well as extensive bruising and scrapes from the night of April 18.


 
 
 
 

Inquiry learns details of abuse, control suffered by spouse of N.S. mass shooter

Lisa Banfield says she was convinced the gunman would kill her family if she left him

Inquiry hears from spouse of N.S. mass shooter about years of abuse, control

1 day ago
Duration 2:17
The public inquiry into the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting released dramatic, previously unseen video and testimony from the gunman's spouse Wednesday. She described suffering years of abuse at the gunman's hand, including on the night he killed 22 people.

Warning: details are disturbing.

The first time Lisa Banfield says she was physically abused by her partner was a terrifying assault where she ran into the woods in the early 2000s.

"He was running after me and I was screaming my head off, and then he caught me and then he … you know, I had blood all over me and he was dragging me back," Banfield recalled to police.

It's a scene she said played out again years later, the night her common-law spouse Gabriel Wortman began a shooting rampage in Portapique, N.S., that would leave 22 Nova Scotians dead.

The gunman's violence, emotional abuse and other controlling behaviour toward Banfield throughout their 19-year relationship are outlined in a new foundational document released Wednesday by the Mass Casualty Commission. The document is based on interviews with Banfield, her family and other witnesses.

The commission is leading the inquiry into the mass shootings on April 18 and 19, 2020, examining the tragedy and the factors that led up to it, including the violence in Wortman's family and his history of harassment and attacks on others.

Banfield, who is set to testify before the inquiry for the first time Friday, gave four police interviews following the massacre and five interviews with the commission itself in recent months.

Physical abuse began after party

The documents show that Banfield met Wortman in May 2001 at the now-defunct Halifax pub, the Thirsty Duck.

On their first date, he showed up with a dozen long-stemmed roses. Banfield felt that was "too showy," and said she wasn't impressed. But later in the evening, she was impressed by the gunman's calm demeanour when his car was rear-ended.

Things moved quickly after that. Three months later, Banfield had moved in with the gunman.

Initially, she described Wortman as "sweet and caring." That was before the first time she was physically abused, following a party at a cottage in Sutherland Lake, about a half-hour drive north of Portapique.

Although witnesses differed on when the incident happened — Banfield said it was in 2001, others suggested it was as late as 2007 — the commission said it was likely after October 2002 when the gunman bought his Portapique cottage.

The burned out remains of Gabriel Wortman's home on Portapique Beach Road, N.S., taken May 13, 2020. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

Banfield said Renée Karsten, a denturist who worked with Wortman at his Dartmouth clinic, invited the couple up for the night. But when Banfield wanted to leave and offered to take the gunman's Jeep home so he could stay, this "set him off."

As she left, the gunman jumped in the car and began hitting her in the head as she continued trying to drive. Banfield said she was crying so hard she couldn't see, so she stopped and fled into the woods.

The gunman soon caught Banfield and dragged her back to the car, but she ran away again when a group of people from the party arrived.

Karsten told police she saw Wortman dragging Banfield by the hair in the driveway, so she "lost it" and tried to intervene.

"His face and just the look in his eyes … it scared the hell out of me," Karsten told police.

Police involved, no charges laid

Karsten brought Banfield back to the cottage, and police came and drove the gunman back to his Portapique home. Banfield said that was the only time police were involved, and nothing came of the incident.

The commission said in the document it's unclear exactly why police were called and what they knew about the situation. While police records from this time "may have been purged" by now, the commission continues to investigate.

When Banfield eventually returned to the Portapique cottage that night, she saw the gunman pulling the tires off her car and throwing them over a bank. He told her to come inside, but she went to a neighbour's and waited for her niece to pick her up.

The niece, Stephanie Goulding, said Banfield was bloody and scraped up, with torn clothing. Goulding wanted to stop into the Truro police station to report the assault, but Banfield "begged" her not to, so instead a sister took photos of her injuries.

Banfield moved back into her sister Maureen Banfield's home after this, but Wortman soon began visiting and apologizing, saying he'd been drinking and he would never hurt her again — and they got back together.

This pattern would continue through the years, both Banfield and two of her sisters told police. The few times her family knew of the abuse and urged her to report it or leave the relationship, Banfield didn't want to take that step.

The gunman would often kick and punch the parts of her body that could be covered by clothing, Banfield said, like arms and legs. If he left marks on her neck while choking her, Banfield said she would use makeup to cover them.

On at least two occasions, Banfield said he put a gun to her head. 

"He would say afterwards, 'If I didn't love you, I wouldn't do this because that's how much I care about you,'" she told the commission.

One sister, Janice Banfield, called the gunman a "sociopath" and said she thought "we're gonna have to bury our sister one day."

But Banfield said she felt she had nowhere to go, because the gunman frequently threatened to kill her or her family if she ever left him.

"He would be like, 'I know where your family lives,' and look at me a certain way," she said.

Violence more prevalent than first reported

While Banfield originally told RCMP officers there had been around 10 incidents of physical abuse over the years, she has since told the commission there were actually far more.

"I just don't trust very well, and I was scared to say anything," she told the commission this May.

She originally told police years would go by between attacks, and the last time had been three years before the mass shooting. Upon reflection, Banfield told the commission that was part of her coping mechanism. 

Banfield would write a journal entry about an incident but never revisit it, so she believed an assault hadn't happened in years even though it was happening "all along."

"I would just have to block it out because … I needed to deal with whatever is going on in that moment, so I couldn't think about what's gone on," Banfield said.

Only one neighbour reported abuse

There were at least two instances of abuse witnessed by other people in Portapique. 

One day, the gunman's uncle Glynn Wortman and another neighbour saw him choking Banfield on the front lawn of their cottage. The uncle yelled, "You're just like your father, get off of her," Banfield recalled.

Earlier this week, the inquiry heard accounts from several of the gunman's uncles describing incidents of his father, Paul Wortman, abusing his wife, Evelyn.

One Portapique neighbour, Brenda Forbes, heard about the incident Glynn Wortman saw and reported it to the RCMP in 2013. Nothing came of her complaint, and Forbes said no one else in the community believed her or wanted to get involved. 

Banfield said she never told her family doctor about the abuse, and was careful to schedule visits only when she had no visible injuries.

Psychologist urged her to leave

But at one point, Banfield said things were "so bad" she saw a psychologist in Bedford who told her she was in an abusive relationship. This professional provided support and encouraged her to leave, but the gunman found out about it and made her stop.

The gunman also threatened to confront the doctor, Banfield said, and she felt "trapped."

Although Banfield said she was always "on eggshells" around the gunman, never knowing what would set him off, she consistently forgave his behaviour and tried to show him he was loved because "everybody always left him."

In a statement to the commission, Banfield wrote she felt bad for the gunman when he told her about how his father abused him as a child, especially because she had such a large and loving family.

"I thought I could help him if I just loved him unconditionally," Banfield said.

Controlling, isolating behaviour 

The range of abuse the gunman inflicted on Banfield fits into the definitions of intimate-partner violence and coercive control, which are laid out in an inquiry report from Dr. Katreena Scott on interventions to address abuse.

Scott writes that intimate-partner violence includes a range of behaviours besides physical violence, like unwanted sexual activity, threats, humiliation, and economic abuse which deprives a victim of the ability to provide for their own needs.

Coercive control is a set of behaviours that disempower someone in a relationship, Scott said, like removing their liberties, threats to their family, and limiting access to loved ones or transportation.

"Very early on there were so many signs of his controlling or bullying behaviour, but somehow, I was able to block it out and justify to myself how badly he treated me," Banfield wrote in a statement to the commission.

"Gabriel was jealous, controlling, possessive, extremely degrading, and piggish; it was 'his way or the highway.'"

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

Banfield said within the first couple of years, the gunman was able to convince her to quit her bank job at RBC so she could come work for his denturist business, which would make it easier for them to take time off and travel together. 

"I realize now that he just wanted to control my entire life," Banfield wrote to the commission.

He urged her to sell the car she'd had throughout her previous marriage, and he eventually bought her a Mercedes under his name.

Banfield was in the gunman's will by 2011, but her sister Maureen Banfield was worried she'd be left with nothing if they broke up because she had no other income or investments of her own.

By 2020, Banfield said she believed she was making around $25 an hour, but the clinic didn't have a regular payroll system. Instead, the gunman would write her cheques from a business account or give her cash, sometimes deducting a percentage from her cheques "for retirement," she said.

"He dealt with all the money things, so I trusted whatever," Banfield told the commission.

'He wanted me to know that without him, I had nothing'

Besides her work at his clinics, Banfield said she would wait on the gunman "hand and foot" by making all the meals and handling the cleaning and organizing of the household. She told one of her sisters it was the way she was raised and she wanted to take on these tasks.

Banfield said in her written statement the gunman controlled everything in her life, so when she didn't obey, he could take things away to "punish her," including her car keys, phone and salary.

"He wanted me to know that without him, I had nothing. I believed that," she wrote. "Made me feel so stupid and incapable of doing things on my own even though I did everything for him."

The gunman also often groped Banfield in front of her family because he thought "it was funny," she said, and their sexual relationship was always defined by his wants and needs, not hers.

Sex between them did not involve intimacy or tenderness, Banfield wrote to the commission, and said the gunman was "addicted to pornography." 

Despite his many affairs, including with Portapique neighbours or his own patients, Banfield said she forgave him every time — and "I am so ashamed of that."

Unhappy with Banfield socializing

While Banfield said the gunman would often become mad at her for wanting to see her siblings or other family, Banfield said he also didn't like her becoming too friendly with people in Portapique.

If he saw her having fun at neighbourhood parties, Banfield said the gunman would put her down in front of others for "acting like an idiot" and drag her away by the arm. If she refused, he would become violent and slap her or pull her hair.

At work, Banfield said he also belittled her and screamed at her in front of patients. When out for dinner one night, the gunman threw a glass of water in her face and left her alone in the restaurant.

The gunman's controlling behaviour and jealousy appeared to weigh on Banfield's mind. One time, Banfield saw another denturist while out drinking with her sister, and was terrified they might tell the gunman because she wasn't supposed to be out.

When her mother died, her high school boyfriend attended the funeral, but Banfield ushered him out, saying the gunman disliked him and would be upset he was there.

The violence and control from the gunman lasted until April 18, 2020, when he attacked Banfield on the night of their 19th anniversary. He threw her in his mock RCMP cruiser, but she said she escaped through an opening in the car's partition and hid in the woods overnight.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Haley Ryan

Reporter

Haley Ryan is a reporter based in Halifax. Got a story idea? Send an email to haley.ryan@cbc.ca, or reach out on Twitter @hkryan17.

 
 
 
 

Lisa Banfield re-enactment videos raise questions about why she was charged

Women’s Shelters Canada worries Banfield's experience with police will deter other women from reporting abuse

The release of new videos showing the longtime partner of the Nova Scotia mass shooter re-enacting what she saw and experienced the night of the rampage is raising questions about why police charged her in the weeks following the shootings.

The Mass Casualty Commission released footage Wednesday of Lisa Banfield walking an RCMP investigator through what she remembered happening in Portapique, N.S., on April 18 and 19, 2020, including how her partner beat her and tried to handcuff her.

The re-enactment was filmed in late October 2020, six months after Gabriel Wortman killed 22 people while driving a mock RCMP car.

A few weeks after filming the re-enactment, Banfield was charged with supplying ammunition to the gunman. 

The Crown eventually determined there was no public interest in sending the case to trial and instead referred the matter to restorative justice. Upon completion, the criminal charge will be dropped.

"I have concerns about the timeline and concerns about the fact she was charged in the first place," Banfield's defence lawyer, James Lockyer, said Thursday.

Erin Breen, a lawyer representing three sexual assault and justice groups — Avalon Sexual Assault Centre, Wellness Within, and the Women's Legal Education and Action Fund —  said she has concerns with the sequence of events.

"It's always been a very troubling issue from our perspective. My clients were quite outraged when they learned that Ms. Banfield was being charged," she said.

"Systemically it's a problem when a survivor comes forward and shares information about their survival behaviour and ends up getting charged in a criminal investigation." 

Banfield said she pleaded with gunman

In the videos released Wednesday, Banfield explains how the couple had been marking their 19th anniversary when they began fighting.

After she turned in for the night, Banfield said the gunman pulled the covers off the bed and assaulted her, kicking her into the bedpost. He then pulled her through the cottage, which she noticed was already doused in gasoline, and set the building on fire once they got outside, she told the investigator.

Banfield said the gunman dragged her into the garage and tried to put her in handcuffs. 

"Looking at his eyes, there was nothing there," she said. "It was just so cold."

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

Banfield was able to escape — shoeless  — and hide for the next few hours, terrified he would find her as she heard gunshots.

Medical records released through the inquiry show Banfield spent five nights in hospital after suffering a fractured rib and vertebrae, as well as extensive bruising and scrapes from the night of April 18.

Other documents made public Thursday as part of the commission covered how the gunman used violence, emotional abuse and other controlling behaviour toward Banfield for nearly two decades.

Push for more police training 

Megan Stephens, lawyer for Women's Shelters Canada, said she worries Banfield's experience will discourage other women from going to police.

"I'm concerned about the message that people get because sometimes violence is such that people do need to call the police; there is no one else who could step in to protect them," she said.

"But in this case, it feels like there were multiple failures of that, and the message that I think unfortunately women will get if they connect these dots, if they themselves are living in abusive relationships, is I don't know if that's the right option for me."

WATCH | Inquiry hears from spouse of N.S. mass shooter about years of abuse, control

Inquiry hears from spouse of N.S. mass shooter about years of abuse, control

1 day ago
Duration 2:17
The public inquiry into the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting released dramatic, previously unseen video and testimony from the gunman's spouse Wednesday. She described suffering years of abuse at the gunman's hand, including on the night he killed 22 people.

Breen said she hopes the commission's work will at least spark a conversation about how police and the justice system should approach intimate partner abuse.

"You see it quite commonly in situations where women are defending themselves in a violent conformation, end up getting charged with assault themselves," she said. 

"The current policy of a pro-arrest, pro-charge, pro-prosecution removes any choice or power from the person who has survived the violence."

Stephens said she also hopes police get more training about how to recognize and better respond to abuse, including controlling behaviour.

Lisa Banfield's running shoes, lost while fleeing Gabriel Wortman, are shown as commission counsel Gillian Hnatiw presents a foundational document about the violent behaviour that Wortman directed toward Banfield, his common-law spouse, at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18 and 19, 2020, in Halifax on Wednesday, July 13, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

"Intimate partner violence doesn't just involve discrete acts of physical violence, there are other ways in which controlling, coercive behaviour can really lead people to basically be stuck in situations and to have no control," she said.

"Unfortunately, there is not enough training that goes into preparing officers who are on the front line. All the more so in some of these rural communities where you don't have specialists, you have generalists."

Banfield felt 'betrayed' by re-enactment filming

In an interview Banfield gave to a commission lawyer in April of this year, she said she felt ambushed by the re-enactment filming.

She said she wanted to meet RCMP Sgt. Greg Vardy at the cottage in Portapique so he could see where her sneakers had been left and where she had hid overnight. It was the first time she had returned to the cottage since the night of the rampage. 

"I heard that people were thinking I'm lying about what happened, it's like, I thought if I go up there for the first time, I want somebody to see that, you know, to find my shoes, to find this tree, to find the things that I'm telling you that happened," she said.

But Banfield said when she went to meet the Mountie, he had brought along a small audio and video crew.

"It was just feeling like I was betrayed," she said. 

Her sister, Maureen, later jumps in on the interview. She said Banfield wasn't in the right mental shape to do the re-enactment. 

"Here's the thing that I feel is probably the deepest betrayal in terms of the manipulation of her actually being investigated without our knowledge," Maureen Banfield said.

"It was horrific and I think it was very damning to her mentally, and that's for me, I think, the most egregious thing that took place in terms of her well-being and putting her first." 

Banfield not under investigation during filming

A spokesperson for the RCMP said Banfield was not under investigation at the time of the re-enactment filming.

"The victim/witness video re-enactment was related to a period of time where Ms. Banfield was a victim of multiple crimes. Given that she was not under investigation, it would not have been appropriate to provide her with rights that are given to a person who is being investigated for an offence or who is under arrest," said Cpl. Chris Marshall.

"Lisa Banfield was provided her reason for arrest, rights to counsel and police warning, as required by the law, during the investigation in which she is charged with ammunition-related offences."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau, where she covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously for CBC in Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca

With files from Haley Ryan

 
 

3 accused of giving N.S. gunman ammunition named in lawsuit filed by families

Lisa Banfield, James Banfield, Brian Brewster listed as defendants alongside shooter's estate

Three people accused of giving ammunition to the man responsible for killing 22 people in Nova Scotia have now been added as defendants to the proposed class-action lawsuit launched by families of the victims. 

On April 18 and 19, denturist Gabriel Wortman killed neighbours, acquaintances and strangers, and burned several homes, including his cottage, before being shot and killed by police in Enfield, N.S. During most of the attacks, he was driving a decommissioned cruiser that he'd adapted to look like a real RCMP vehicle. 

The gunman's common-law spouse, Lisa Banfield, 52, her brother James Blair Banfield, 54, of Beaver Bank, N.S., and her brother-in-law Brian Brewster, 60, of Lucasville, N.S., have been charged with unlawfully providing the shooter with .223-calibre Remington cartridges and .40-calibre Smith & Wesson cartridges in the month leading up to the massacre, which began in Portapique, N.S.

Lisa Banfield is facing two counts and her relatives are each facing one count. They're all expected to enter pleas at their next court date in Dartmouth provincial court on March 9

Now, in addition to the criminal charges, the three are named in the lawsuit that argues they and the gunman's estate —which has been valued at $2.1 million— are liable to the families of the people who lost their lives, the estates and people who suffered damage to property and people who were injured due to Wortman's actions. 

There is a separate lawsuit families have filed against the RCMP and the province. 

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

The statement of claim filed against the estate alleges that in addition to killing 22 people, Wortman injured six people, killed five pets and burned or damaged three vehicles and four homes. 

Lisa Banfield, James Banfield and Brian Brewster's names were added to the lawsuit on Feb. 5. The other defendants include the public trustee, which is representing Wortman's estate, and three companies Wortman owned and controlled: Berkshire Broman Corp., Atlantic Denture Clinic Inc., and Northumberland Investments Inc.

"Ultimately, our job is to protect the interests of the families of those lost in the April tragedies and of course the victims, the survivors of that tragedy as well," said lawyer Sandra McCulloch, who represents the plaintiffs. "That requires us pursuing this avenue of potential recourse and accountability and answers for our families." 

In order to proceed as a class action, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court must certify the lawsuit. That has not yet happened. None of the named defendants have filed statements in response to the allegations made by the plaintiffs. 

The burned remains of Gabriel Wortman’s cottage in Portapique, N.S. Wortman disguised himself as a Mountie and over the course of 13 hours the night of April 18, 2020, and the following morning travelled nearly 200 kilometres in and around Portapique, killing 22 people. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

When the RCMP announced the criminal charges in December, the force said the trio were not aware of Wortman's plans.

The criminal case "coupled with the other information and evidence that we've been gathering on our end adds up to there being support for some degree of culpability on the part of each of those individuals," said McCulloch. 

Lawsuit alleges spouse acquired gasoline

The updated statement of claim alleges that Lisa Banfield "was aware of and facilitated Wortman's preparations, including but not limited to, his accumulation of firearms, ammunition, other weapons, gasoline, police paraphernalia, and the outfitting of a replica RCMP vehicle." 

It alleges Banfield "directly acquired some of the accelerants and ammunition used by Wortman in the crime spree" and that James Banfield and Brian Brewster also "directly acquired" ammunition. 

The proposed lawsuit claims all three were "negligent in [the] acquisition of these items" and that they "knew or ought to have known that Wortman had tortious intentions."

McCulloch declined to elaborate on the exact nature of the additional evidence gathered to support the allegations. 

The investigative firm Martin and Associates has been working with Patterson Law since the law firm was retained by the families. Last fall it set up a website to collect tips and information related to the mass shootings

Though police have said Lisa Banfield was the first victim of violence in Portapique on April 18, she was always excluded as a plaintiff from the families' lawsuit. 

"From our perspective, there has always been a possibility of a conflict of interest between [Banfield's] interest and those of our clients. And you're seeing that now manifest itself in our amendments," said McCulloch.

Spouse suing estate separately

In a separate civil case, however, Banfield is also suing her former partner's estate, which includes six properties, three corporations and $705,000 in cash seized from the wreckage of the couple's cottage in Portapique.

In her statement of claim, which was filed with the Nova Scotia Supreme Court last summer, Banfield said she was the victim of assault and battery, and suffered physical, emotional and psychological injuries and trauma.

Search warrant documents show several people told investigators Banfield, who lived with Wortman above the denture clinic in Dartmouth where they both worked, was abused during their 19-year relationship.

Lawyers representing Banfield are also opposing the application by CBC and other media organizations to lift some redactions in the search warrants related to the mass shooting investigation.

Banfield opposed to lifting redactions

In documents filed with the court on Feb. 5, James Lockyer and Jessica Zita, the Toronto lawyers who are representing Banfield, argue that 13 redacted paragraphs should remain blacked out because they explain the Crown's case against their client and "invades Lisa solicitor-client privilege." 

One paragraph is a summary of a statement Banfield's friend and lawyer Kevin van Bargen gave to police. 

"His information deals with business and financial affairs, unrelated and peripheral to the events. This invasion of Lisa's solicitor-client privilege is unwarranted, would not be permitted at her trial, and should not be provided to the media," the lawyers stated in the filings. 

Their filings said Lisa Banfield gave four statements to police, on April 19, April 20, April 28 and July 28. They said the other sections that should remain redacted pertain to her statements and those made by her co-accused and other family members who spoke to police between April and July.

Meanwhile, work on a public inquiry into the mass killings is underway. Last month the commission announced the staff who will lead the teams involved in the joint federal-provincial inquiry.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Elizabeth McMillan is a journalist with CBC in Halifax. Over the past 13 years, she has reported from the edge of the Arctic Ocean to the Atlantic Coast and loves sharing people's stories. Please send tips and feedback to elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 

Cross-examination of N.S. killer's spouse could promote conspiracy theories: lawyer

HALIFAX -

There are good reasons why the spouse of the man responsible for the worst mass shooting in modern Canadian history should not face cross-examination when she testifies Friday before a public inquiry, her lawyer says.

James Lockyer said Thursday his client, Lisa Banfield, should not be retraumatized by lawyers who seem determined to explore conspiracy theories about what happened April 18-19, 2020, when Gabriel Wortman killed 22 people during a 13-hour rampage across Nova Scotia.

The Toronto lawyer said some lawyers who represent victims' families appear keen to ask Banfield how she managed to escape from her deranged partner and survive a bitterly cold night in the woods around Portapique, N.S., on the first night of the rampage.

"Some of the lawyers, one or two of them, have been pretty hyperbolic in their statements," Lockyer said in an interview with The Canadian Press.

"They talk of wanting to cross-examine her about certain aspects of her trauma that night without ever explaining their goals. And their goals, when you think about it, can only be conspiracy-theorist goals."

Lockyer said the purpose of raising questions about Banfield's whereabouts would be to challenge her credibility and suggest that she may have spent the night elsewhere, which he says is absurd.

"These mass casualty events, particularly (those) we've seen south of the border, do give rise to conspiracy theorists," Lockyer said. "We don't need that in Canada. We don't need that in Nova Scotia. I think the commission is to be congratulated that they're not willing to entertain it."

Lawyer Michael Scott, whose firm represents 14 of the victims' families, challenged Lockyer's conspiracy comments, arguing that the inquiry's decision to limit questioning will leave lingering doubts about Banfield's testimony.

"There are very good questions to be asked about how she survived overnight," Scott said Thursday. "And by arranging a process where nobody is allowed to ask reasonable questions, then this promotes conspiracy theories."

The three commissioners overseeing the federal-provincial inquiry recently decided Banfield will not face cross-examination from lawyers who represent relatives of the victims, mainly because she could be traumatized by having to relive the violence she endured.

The inquiry has heard evidence that Banfield, whose relationship with Wortman spanned 19 years, was the victim of a controlling, abusive man who repeatedly beat her. Banfield has also told the RCMP and the commission that she was beaten and threatened immediately before her husband started killing people in Portapique.

On Thursday, the commission issued written reasons for its decision to limit questioning of Banfield, arguing that the role of a public inquiry is not the same as a trial.

"We have been clear from the beginning that this is not an adversarial, trial-like proceeding," the ruling says. The decision says the commission's approach "represents the most effective way to gather Ms. Banfield's best evidence."

Sandra McCulloch, a lawyer who works at the same firm as Scott, said inquiries and trials should share a commitment to finding facts.

"As much as we're in a different kind of legal proceeding, we're still in a proceeding where we have to have reliable evidence, and part of having reliable evidence is allowing it to be tested," McCulloch said. "That's largely not going to happen."

McCulloch is concerned that Banfield will not be asked about her partner's violent behaviour while they were together on that deadly weekend in April 2020.

In an earlier statement, the commission said Banfield may be accompanied by two support people and will "address remaining questions relevant to the commission's mandate."

Earlier this week, the commission released a 100-page document based on evidence provided by Banfield during four interviews with the RCMP and five interviews with the inquiry. That document provided extensive details about the killer's long history of gender-based violence.

As well, the inquiry on Wednesday was shown a video recording of a 90-minute RCMP interview, which featured Banfield providing a detailed description of what happened to her on the night of April 18, 2020.

The commission has confirmed participating lawyers have been invited to submit questions in advance of Banfield's testimony, and they can bring forward further questions on Friday.

Scott has said his clients have instructed him not to submit written questions for Banfield because doing so would lend legitimacy to a flawed process.

Lawyers for some families boycotted proceedings in May after the inquiry prevented cross-examination of two RCMP staff sergeants who oversaw the early response to the mass shooting.

Lockyer said his client was feeling apprehensive about appearing before the inquiry, which will be the first time she has spoken in public about the tragedy.

"I know ... she says to herself, `If I hadn't run and got away, would I have saved 22 lives?' And of course she says that to herself and always will. The probable answer is that it would have been 23 lives and not 22, but she's never going to believe that."

It's important to remember that Banfield was the first victim of the "mass casualty" event, he said.

"I don't think Lisa sees herself as a victim. She's too conscious of the people who were killed and their families. It's going to be a difficult day for her."

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 14, 2022.

 
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bergen, Candice - M.P."<candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:44 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Hon. Candice Bergen, thank you for contacting the
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.

Ms. Bergen greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
possible.

If you are a constituent of Ms. Bergen’s in Portage-Lisgar with an
urgent matter please provide complete contact information.  Not
identifying yourself as a constituent could result in a delayed
response.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,

Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Au nom de l’hon. Candice Bergen, nous vous remercions de communiquer
avec le Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle.

Mme Bergen accorde une grande importance aux commentaires des
Canadiens.  Nous lisons et étudions tous les courriels entrants.
Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.  Nous y
répondons le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous faites partie de l’électorat de Mme Bergen dans la
circonscription de Portage-Lisgar et que votre affaire est urgente,
veuillez fournir vos coordonnées complètes.  Si vous ne le faites pas,
cela pourrait retarder la réponse.

Nous vous remercions une fois encore d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,

Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Rempel, Michelle - M.P."<Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. thank
you for your email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in
touch with the MP. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our
office receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded
to:

If you are a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:

Queries regarding government programs, policies and operations take
time to research, contact appropriate departments and collate
information for dissemination to you. If you have provided your full
contact details on your query, your email will be responded to as
necessary.

If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, tax issues,
etc.), consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can
be activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent
form, a staff member will be in contact with you.

If you are not a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:

If you are not a Calgary Nose Hill resident, given the high volume of
emails we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as
INFORMATION. If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be
responded to as necessary.
If you are contacting MP Rempel Garner to review your case work,
please first contact your local MP for assistance.
If your email is a form letter:

Thank you for submitting this form letter. Due to the high volume of
emails M.P. Rempel Garner’s office receives, we are unable to
individually reply to form letters, particularly from non
constituents. Form letters are template letters generated by
organizations, webforms and other sources on a given issue. However,
M.P. Rempel Garner does review and consider information received from
all form letters.

If you are a constituent and would like a response regarding the
specific issue raised in your form letter, please email M.P. Rempel
Garner’s office individually at this email address with “Constituent -
(Insert subject)” in the subject of your email. This helps us to
identify constituents who wish to receive a response among the
hundreds of form letter responses our office receives on any given
day.

Again, thank you for reaching out to our office.

Invites:
If you have invited MP Rempel Garner to your event, please note that
decisions on what events to attend are completed on a bi-monthly
basis. As our office receives hundreds of invitations each week, our
office will only contact you if MP Rempel Garner will be attending.
Updates on MP Rempel Garner’s Work:
If you wish to know what is happening in Calgary Nose Hill and the job
MP Rempel Garner is doing for you in Ottawa, please sign up for her
e-newsletter on her website: https://mprempel.ca/
*M.P. Rempel Garner's office has a zero tolerance policy for
threatening, abusive, or aggressive language or behaviour towards the
Member and their staff. Phone calls, voicemails and emails containing
threatening or abusive language will result in the termination of
communications.

Thank you again.

Sincerely,
Office of The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P.
Calgary Nose Hill




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Kennedy, Aaron"<akennedy@quispamsis.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.
I am out of the office until Monday, and will respond at that time. If
you require immediate assistance, please call 849-5778.
- Aaron



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:42 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.

As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.

If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
Government of Nova Scotia please visit:
http://novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CJane.MacDonald%40novascotia.ca%7Ceeca3674da1940841c1b08da0c273c2c%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637835659900957160%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2BUnVWeFXmCZiYsg7%2F6%2Bw55jn3t3WTeGL9l%2BLp%2BNkqNU%3D&reserved=0>

Thank you,

Premier’s Correspondence Team


---------- Original message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:44 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Tom Taggart <tom.taggartmla@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 06:18:42 -0700
Subject: Re: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was that he would
not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday No doubt a
host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting us at the office of MLA Tom.Taggart. This
email is being monitored by my Constituency Assistant Andrea. Johnson,
who will get back to you as soon as possible. If your inquiry is
urgent, please feel free to call the Constituency Office @
902-641-2335

Our Office is located @ 10653 Hwy 2 Masstown, Nova Scotia, right next
door to the Petro- Canada.
Our Office hours are Monday- Friday 8:30am - 3:30pm or by appointment.
We are closed on Holidays.

--
Tom Taggart, MLA
Colchester North
(O) - 902-641-2335
tom.taggartmla@gmail.com



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 10:18:37 -0300
Subject: Re: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was that he would
not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday No doubt a
host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: THopper@postmedia.com, "jagmeet.singh"<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca, "pierre.poilievre"
<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, jennifer@halifaxexaminer.ca,
paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Tom.Taggartmla@gmail.com,
darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca, bmassey@justice.gc.ca, "Amato, Mike #509"
<509@yrp.ca>, brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "michelle.rempel"
<michelle.rempel@parl.gc.ca>, kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca,
Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>, akennedy@quispamsis.ca,
"elizabeth.mcmillan"<elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca>, Justice Minister
<JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, PREMIER@novascotia.ca, andrewjdouglas
<andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca,
NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, tim
<tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis"
<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>

https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/episodes/nova-scotia-mass-shooting-220710

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 10 - 11, 2022 - Weekly updates
and revelations (with Paul Palango)

In this double episode I share my two recent conversations with Paul
Palango. The first, recorded on July 10th, is our discussion
surrounding the interview with Rob the carpenter. The second, recorded
the next day, is an emergency update in which Paul and I discuss the
bizarre lie the that Rob the Carpenter told… and what that means to
the broader story.

Episode Links:

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series:
https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova-scotia-rampage

Join the Nova Scotia Mass Casualty Discussion Group:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/novascotiamasscasualty

Send a tip related to this case: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/cont


 https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/325844615728004/?type=3

  ·
Dear Frank:
I’m not a fan of your magazine; however, recently you have stepped out
of the fray and produced some very good journalism. Your interview
with Gabriel Wortman’s father being the most noteworthy. Some of your
Portapique coverage is noteworthy. Frank has a place in society.
However, your recent inclusion of Paul Palango is pointing you and our
neighbours in a very dark place as a society. I can’t reveal my real
identity due to my employment as I would be shunned by my colleagues
in media. I am aware, based on verifiable information that the
Canadian mainstream media has turned its back on Paul Palango, who was
a onetime trusted news source and held respect.
The tide began to shift several years ago when some of his views were
not based on credible information, but conjecture and speculation or
as the mainstream media believes, he is falling into some mental
health crisis.
Maclean’s leaned into Paul because he seemed to have information
nobody else had, and produced sources within the Mounties. It’s just
they were not credible, and had an axe to grind. Maclean’s verified
this fact and they cut Paul loose after that infamous story from last
June.
And they told other media sources that he is treacherous.
A colleague is working on a story about Lisa Banfield that has her and
her lawyer working on a libel suit against Frank and Paul. My sources
tell me the Mounties have nothing to suggest she is misaligned and
very much is a victim. After the inquiry and the evidence comes out
they will be positioned to be successful in showing Palango was
libellous.
I support what you do, I don’t agree with the style, but we are a free
society. My only reason for stepping in is that you are printing what
will be shown to be his false narrative based on untrustworthy sources
and possibly mental illness.
Ivana Smear,
Via email

Dear Ms. Smear:
This may come as a surprise to you, but I’ve heard this all before.
My position is very clear.
Since the first reports of gunshots at Portapique Beach on April 18,
2020, the response by the RCMP has been stranger than strange.
The Mounties arrived on scene in time to potentially trap the killer
in the community and perhaps prevent at least the last five murders.
Instead, Wortman got past them, had a rest in Debert, and then was
allowed to roam around Nova Scotia, killing nine more people.
Lisa Banfield says she hid in the woods for about eight hours on a
blistering cold night. She went to Leon Joudrey’s house at 6:34 a.m.
He has told many reporters and the police that he did not believe her
story.
The earliest reports claimed Banfield suffered severe injuries from a
beating administered by Gabriel Wortman.
Actually, the RCMP and the Crown blacked out the first description of
those injuries. The word they blacked out was “minor,” which was
consistent with what Joudrey said.
You suggest that I am treacherous and not trusted by the mainstream
media because of a story you highlighted in Maclean’s magazine from
last June.
For that story we obtained a copy of the RCMP’s undercover manual.
Among other things described in that document are the procedures the
force should use in a blown undercover operation.
The actions of the RCMP before, during and after the weekend of April
18-19 largely conform to the procedures described. I’ve spent the past
eight months trying to disprove that there was an undercover operation
in Portapique — to no avail.
The more I investigate the more it appears that someone in Wortman’s
circle appeared to have a special relationship with the authorities —
be they the RCMP, Halifax Police or even CSIS. Nothing is conclusive,
but that doesn’t mean you just give up because it’s too difficult.
That isn’t in my DNA.
My role as a journalist is to act as a disinterested investigator
whose duty it is to uncover the truth and show no fear or favouritism
to anyone. Like a pathologist, I am a friend of the dead. As Joseph
Pulitizer once put it: “Newspapers should have no friends.”
I am not here to be liked. I am not in it for the money, although some
uninformed critics have wrongly accused me of being so. I am here to
be the agent of the story and to do what it dictates that I must do.
As for Ms. Banfield, I believe it is in the public interest that her
story be fully examined because she was apparently the last person to
see Wortman before he went on his rampage.
You say Maclean’s dropped me because I was unreliable.
I can assure you that is not what happened.
I withdrew my story and chose to run it in Frank, as written.
That same story generated a number of leads which lead to the
discovery of the Pictou County analog recordings from the weekend in
question.
Stories about what was on those tapes brought even more stories and leads.
That’s what good journalists do.
As for my mental health, some people think I’m crazy for doing what
I’m doing. I have a nice, comfortable life. I took this on to help
other journalists, but when I found their work wanting, I got more and
more involved. That being the case, maybe I do have a mental health
issue. I admit that I can be a pain in the ass, but I always strive to
do the right thing.
The funny thing about my mental health is that the one agency slyly
pushing that narrative has been the RCMP.
“Look at the source,” referring to me, when another reporter tried
following up one of my stories.
“Another fairy tale,” Supt. Darren Campbell put it to the CBC’s
Elizabeth McMillan when commenting on another story. I stand by my
work in the past and now. Don’t you find it disturbing that the RCMP
is willing to invest in character assassination rather than address
the very real issues raised about his dysfunctional organization?
That’s not a good thing in a supposed democracy.
If you still insist on pushing the mental health angle, perhaps we can
both submit to a Rorschach test to determine who sees the crazier
stuff in the inkblots.
You also state that Banfield and her lawyer, James Lockyer, are
planning to sue me sometime down the road.
I know Mr. Lockyer from my days in Toronto. He lived on the next block
when he was defending Rubin (Hurricane) Carter, who strolled by my
house on his regular walks. Lockyer is a good lawyer and always has
been. He’s got to do what he thinks is best for his client.
If Banfield is truly planning to head down that road, I would give her
and Lockyer the following advice.
This is not my first rodeo. As a corporate journalist and as an
individual over the course of my career, I’ve been involved in about
18 major lawsuits (mostly on behalf of reporters who worked for me)
and occasionally as a plaintiff. I’m 16 and 0 with a couple of draws.
My last case should be seen as instructive.
In the mid-1990s, a group of individuals hiding behind a $3-billion
corporation listed on the New York Stock Exchange sued me for
$11-million to stop me from asking questions about them. It didn’t
stop me. They went up to $20 million. It still didn’t stop me. They
tried to hire hit man Ken Murdock to kill me. Murdock turned down the
job because he didn’t think it was right to kill a civilian.
How do I know? I met him. I spent four days in the maximum-security
Kingston Penitentiary interviewing him.
I didn’t counter-sue the company. Instead, I launched an entirely
different suit against it, its executives and lawyers. I called their
lawsuit “public relations.” It ended up being an almost 10-year fight.
The company went bankrupt, but the individuals didn’t. I ended up
getting a nice house of it.
The bottom line is this. I am prepared to take the slings and many
arrows that are fired back at me as a result of what I write.
But attacking the messenger is what the desperate and corrupt have
always done. It’s as old as the Old Testament. Look up Malachi.
The Greek philosopher Sophocles put it this way: “No one loves the
messenger who brings bad news.”
And here’s my take on it all: If you don’t like what I’m reporting and
writing, get off your butt, suck up some courage, do some of your own
investigating and either confirm what I’m reporting or prove me wrong.
You’d be doing everyone a favour — including yourself.
Paul Palango,
Chester

Attacking the messenger...
https://www.frankmagazine.ca/sing.../attacking-the-messenger See less
Comments
Nicholas Langille
Give it to em Paul.
If the rcmp had answers that could be strung together coherently maybe
I could trust what they say. But that hasn't happened .… See more

    Reply
    1y

Jim Barkhouse
Thank you Paul for your in depth coverage of this tragedy, your
pursuit of the truth will set the facts straight and will be
appreciated by all.

    Reply
    1y

Donna Marie Jessome
Wtg Mr. Palango, Keep doing You!
You and LGC are basically all we really have in this Massacre ,who are
trying your darntest to bring the truth forward and for that I Thank
You.

    Reply
    1y

Kelly Smales
This is awesome Paul. We need more courageous journalists like you!

    Reply
    1y

Christine Elliott
Excellent response Paul. as is your work. You’ve been tireless with
the Portipique story and your past work about the RCMP is so valuable.

    Reply
    1y

Paula Jarrett
Excellent work - keep going. People impacted by this horror deserve
nothing less. We all deserve nothing less.

        Reply
        1y



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 07:24:06 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Leger, Louis (PO/CPM)"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 07:24:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Merci pour votre courriel.  Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 14
juillet 2022.  SVP contacter Laura Peasey au Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca ou au
506-230-1364 pour l’assistance.

Thank you for your email.  I will be out of the office until July 14,
2022.  Please contact Laura Peasey at Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca or at
506-230-1364 for assistance.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Bergen, Candice - M.P."<candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 07:24:04 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Hon. Candice Bergen, thank you for contacting the
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.

Ms. Bergen greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
possible.

If you are a constituent of Ms. Bergen’s in Portage-Lisgar with an
urgent matter please provide complete contact information.  Not
identifying yourself as a constituent could result in a delayed
response.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,

Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Au nom de l’hon. Candice Bergen, nous vous remercions de communiquer
avec le Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle.

Mme Bergen accorde une grande importance aux commentaires des
Canadiens.  Nous lisons et étudions tous les courriels entrants.
Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.  Nous y
répondons le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous faites partie de l’électorat de Mme Bergen dans la
circonscription de Portage-Lisgar et que votre affaire est urgente,
veuillez fournir vos coordonnées complètes.  Si vous ne le faites pas,
cela pourrait retarder la réponse.

Nous vous remercions une fois encore d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,

Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle



On 7/11/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/06/how-ns-mass-shooter-controlled.html
>
> Thursday, 30 June 2022
> How the N.S. mass shooter controlled, exploited women around him
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ottjrgpjGRY&ab_channel=NighttimePodcast
>
>
> Video unavailable
> This video is private
>
>
> the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 10, 2022 - with Paul Palango
> 296 watching now
> Started streaming 28 minutes ago
> Nighttime Podcast
> 7.45K subscribers
> Paul Palango and I will discuss the unfolding public inquiry into the
> Nova Scotia Mass Shootings. Advance questions and comments can be
> submitted by voice memo at nighttimepodcast.com/contact
>
> https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/mass-shootings-caused-by-masculinity-says-report-commissioned-by-nova-scotia-inquiry
>
>
> Mass shootings caused by 'masculinity,' says report commissioned by
> Nova Scotia inquiry
>
> The paper makes few mentions of the April 2020 massacre in which a
> 51-year-old man driving a replica police car murdered 22 people
> Author of the article:
> Tristin Hopper
> Publishing date:
> May 03, 2022
>
> RCMP officers prepare to take mass shooter Gabriel Wortman into
> custody at a gas station in Enfield, N.S. on Sunday April 19,
> 2020.RCMP officers prepare to take mass shooter Gabriel Wortman into
> custody at a gas station in Enfield, N.S. on Sunday April 19, 2020.
> Photo by THE CANADIAN PRESS/Tim Krochak
>
> Amid criticisms that Nova Scotia’s Mass Casualty Commission has been
> far too reticent to criticize police actions amidst Canada’s deadliest
> mass shooting, this week the inquiry took a different focus: the role
> of “masculinity.”
>
> “Our research suggests that mass shootings are a gendered issue: they
> fundamentally have to do with the relationship between men,
> masculinity, and guns,” read the report tabled this week by the
> inquiry.
>
> Mass Shootings and Masculinity, drafted by two University of
> California sociologists, told the commissioners that mass shootings
> are inherently “enactments of masculinity,” and that in addition to
> curbing gun ownership, governments must pursue “cultural change.”
>
> The Mass Casualty Commission is convening hearings this week into the
> April 2020 active shooter incident in which a 51-year-old man driving
> a replica police car murdered 22 people at locations across rural Nova
> Scotia.
>
> In addition to probing the details of the massacre and the police
> response, the commission has also been mandated to examine
> “gender-based and intimate partner violence.”
>
> Notably, the massacre’s perpetrator had a lengthy history of violence
> against his common-law partner, Lisa Banfield. His April 2020 killing
> spree began after an argument in which he shot at Banfield and
> attempted to lock her in one of his replica police cars (she escaped,
> and ultimately survived the massacre).
>
> More On This Topic
>
>     Commission counsel Amanda Byrd presents information at the Mass
> Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia
> on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax.
>     Nova Scotia mass shooting gunman drew police attention 10 years
> before killings
>     A roadside memorial to victims of the Nova Scotia mass killing, in
> Portapique, N.S. on April 22, 2020.
>     Questioning his decisions, RCMP supervisor during N.S. mass
> shooting took 16-month leave afterward
>
> Another expert report received by the commission looked at the
> statistical link between gender-based violence and mass casualty
> attacks. “There is emerging evidence of a very real public risk of
> ‘private’ violence,” reads the report, which was commissioned for the
> inquiry from researchers out of Australia’s Monash University.
>
> But the University of California report does not examine any of the
> specifics of the Nova Scotia shootings, and only briefly touches on
> Canadian mass shootings generally. Rather, it focuses almost entirely
> on mass shootings in the United States, where the phenomenon is known
> to occur with far greater frequency as compared to the rest of the
> world.
>
> The 44-page report writes that U.S. mass shootings do not always
> correlate to state-level rates of gun ownership (Alaska, one of the
> most armed states, also has one of its lowest levels of mass
> shootings). So, researchers also cite a raft of sociological papers
> linking gun violence with race, right-wing politics and even
> “masculine overcompensation.”
>
> “Gun ownership, gun-related fatalities, and gun violence more
> generally are all gendered phenomena,” it reads.
>
> Researchers note at several points throughout the paper that their
> theories may have little bearing on Canada. While attributing American
> mass shootings to a protection-centric U.S. gun culture, the paper
> also says that Canada seems to have a “pre-1970 U.S. gun culture”
> which primarily treats firearms as hunting implements. Not mentioned
> is that in Canada, unlike the United States, it is technically
> forbidden to own firearms for the purposes of personal protection.
>
> In one of the report’s few direct mentions of the Nova Scotia
> massacre, the authors write only that it “resists easy
> classification.”
>
> Mass Casualty Commission hearings first began in February, and have
> faced heavy criticism from the families of massacre victims for its
> apparent reticence to question police actions during the 13 hours of
> the massacre.
>
> Perhaps most notably, the inquiry decided not to include evidence from
> a victim’s FitBit showing that she had a pulse for more than eight
> hours after RCMP members declared her dead.
>
> Hundreds of documents related to the inquiry have also been
> mysteriously removed from the Mass Casualty Commission’s website,
> including testimony from RCMP members criticizing the understaffing at
> select detachments and even internal accusations that one member
> allowed the shooter to “get away.”
>
 
 
 
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - Lisa Banfield Re-enactment watch along / discussion

600 views
Streamed live 18 hours ago
7.48K subscribers
Links: the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova... 
David Amos
Oh Dear 
 
 
 
 
 

Nothing happened at Brink's, and why that's Important

73 views
Jun 20, 2022
61 subscribers
by Paul Palango
 
David Amos
Oh My MY
 
 
 
 

MCC Day 46 – Presentation of Lisa Banfield’s Interviews and Re-enactments

638 views
Jul 13, 2022
643 subscribers
This was a dramatic day of evidence in the Mass Casualty Commission. For the first time, we have heard the voice of Lisa Banfield, and were able to walk in her shoes, in a sense, as she did a re-enactment of her movements during the overnight hours of April 18-19, 2020. This was all in advance of her expected appearance on Friday, and seemed designed to remove all drama from that appearance. Before the presentation, we heard from two Australian experts on gender-based violence.
 
David Amos
Oh Dear
 
 
 
 

650 interview june 11 video

28 views
Apr 16, 2021

61 subscribers
David Amos
Pure D LIEbrano BS
 
 
 
 
 
 

MCC - DAY 48 - LISA BANFIELD VIDEOS AND LEAF AUSTRALIA

1,114 views
Streamed live on Jul 13, 2022
3.41K subscribers
David Amos
Oh Dear
 
 
 
 

June 4 2020 Louise Renault interview with Leon Joudrey

165 views
Apr 24, 2021
61 subscribers
David Amos
Oh My My
 
 
 
 
 

Leon Joudrey: in his own words

9,371 views
Premiered Oct 11, 2020

3.41K subscribers
Heather
Leon, I don't know you but think of you often. He killed 3 people in my hometown (of Shubie) including the Mountie. Everyone who knows the back roads from Halifax to Portipique, knows exactly what roads to take to keep away from cops, driving on exactly the roads he chose, all the way to Shubenacadie, and on to Enfield. When we had active detachments in our small communities (like in Stewiacke), we had much better police service.
4
CON-CAN
Wow. Thank God for him speaking out. God bless you all.
4
God bless you Tara. We are ALL here for you and the other families. We WILL NOT stop.
6
Hockey Max imized
Leon you and I need to get out for a dive this summer. Stay well man.
SadMafioso
At least I can catch this one live!
6
Any bourbon?
2
robert thomas
and they didn't check Leon's house at the first chancethe other thing that strikes me @34:34 is the mounties don't really want to investigate it.it seems odd that Banfield ditched the jacket.
2
K Tibbitts
I just glistening to this one. And Leon says. He left his place at 3:45 to 4am. Drove by GW saw a cop in a passenger seat of the car and he figured they were looking for GW. He said they were on the speaker thing told me to go to the entrance... Wouldn't Lisa B have heard that?? Leon said he ignored that and drove past Blair's and Lisa mccully place and than around the other rd. Would Leon with headlights on driving around see Lisa M on the lawn and Corry on the street.. He also said he noticed a flicker at someone house .. I can't remeber who and said he knew something was wrong than.. But he already knew GW house was on fire.. And had hear 3 gun shots before he dozed off to sleep at 10pm right after he called a friend... Who was the fruend? Lisa B Lisa M. Maybe GW figured out Lisa B had a call Leon right before 10pm???
Kathy Withak
For Leon : did it look like Lisa had been crying? I saw an earlier report where her eye makeup was perfect??!?What kind of person can hear the neighbourhood being slaughtered and set ablaze, and not be absolutely terrified and hysterical? Her not coming out of the woods hours earlier has always bothered me. Corrie’s brother came out, yet she “cowered”?Corries brother came out frost bitten after 3-4 hours, she was in the woods 6-8 and no shoes or jacket. No visible injuries, no frost bite??!? No marcara running down her face?
1
K Tibbitts
He drove to great village fire hall and spoke with Terry Brown...
Chiang Love
happy thanksgiving to you all!
5
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
14:40 Nice catch SeamusAlso further along:residence in maine lines up with american flag parafanalia on Gabe's chopper tank and biker jacket ..juss sayin and $465/hr maybe working on other choppers ..or maybe that's the going rate for smugglers n hitmen these days ..or salary for civilian sector rcmp might be somewhere around $465grand a year.PS you won't see my surveillance cameras from outside my place either. If it can be seen outside then it can be disabled
4
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
Sorry Seamus.. still watching and adding to this..what if Gabe only used the decorated rcmp car for midnight border crossing/smuggling purposes? Maybe that's why that particular car was not seen often by locals.. would be interesting to know when exactly he had the 28B11 car number decal printed..since that number can be attached to Covid antibody clone lab results
1
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Lil Miss Sew It All  I've seen Heidi as the prime target from the start too a whistleblower taken out for betraying code red
1
Terry Trainor
Great interview BUT the Newfoundland women comment was not called for .. I have been to Newfoundland a few times over my lifetime and the people and epically the WOMEN were beautiful ..
2
gayann
Where these crime scenes bulldozed like the Sherman murders and the Pickton crime Scene?
7
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
Pretty telling if you ask me 🤔
2
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
Yes and willy p was making snuff so there were definitely cameras on the pickton property too..same with Wortman properties there woulda been surveillance cameras for sure and sherman's likely too..tho I'd no idea sherman property got dozed over too! 🤯
1
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Jarvis Church  lol we are living in the cloud these days likely sent straight to his cell and also stored in the cloud..where it cannot be burned up or destroyed by anyone but gabriel himself..and if you're here to be the boss of what people might feel is related (or unrelated for that matter) it's likely you who will end up being unwelcome here. Lil miss has been here from the start ..and she contributes
1
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Lil Miss Sew It All  and you're absolutely right about willy..not only has he admitted he did not work alone he just took the fall alone. And he got plenty free passes from his complicit co-conspirators
1
Lady Langton
You guys are getting warmer...
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
Happy Thanks Giving
2
robert thomas
why wasn't this crime scene locked down...
Fi Mi
This video has 7000+ views and most other of LGC vids are about 1000. Hmm
I'm not handsome like Leon...And YT messes with the numbers 😉. We can't believe everything that we see...But I am not as handsome lol
Fi Mi
 @Little Grey Cells  haha very funny. Yes I figured that too about the #s. The LB vids got a lot of views too hmm
K Tibbitts
Leon also says Lisa B came to his door in black spandex pants on.. Dressed in black not freezing just shaking. Scared so he put her in the bathroom till he called 911.. They came and took her right out.. Black spandex. I thought right before this happened she was in bed when GW came to drag her out.. Does she wear black spandex to bed usually?
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
Not to disrespect the guy being interviewed.. but it appears people thought Leon Joudrey was just as crazy as Gabe.. crazy enuf to be shooting guns and lighting fires (according to his own received text messages) curious and curiouserAnd he was interviewed/interrogated but cannot say much because it's ongoing..but he can come on youtube 🤔30:30 ..no NDA? Tho I totally get that he doesn't want to put families under duress... From personal experience closure doesn't come without full disclosure regardless of how harsh or disturbing those details may be.. imso 😏
7
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
And he slept for a couple hours (11-3am roughly?)..but he didn't get any sleep..he left the evacuation center..hid in the woods..left his gun behind under his blankets?..Uber contradictory statements coming from this guy..he's pretty much admitting that he himself could a been the shooter..he lived right there knew the area and the folks.. had guns and was known for setting fires apparently... He definitely don't like cops or at least the way they handled this.. and he admittedly travelled ahead of Gabe on the same route practically..before some of the killings.. plus he admits he held LB captive and wouldn't let her leave, put her in the bathroom?This whole scenario is beyond bizarre
3
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Jarvis Church  I kinda thought the same by the end of this but contradictory statements nuntheless..did he sleep? Did he get no sleep? He was out running around unattended same routes as "gunman" travelled "behind" him...these are his own words not mine.. maybe I'm just being overskeptical.. but with paid actors and ex cops/military etc now being employed by agencies like www.crisiscast.com well...anything's possible. 🤔 Guys got the cop haircut and build.. but I'm sure all your average neighbours do too lol..I dunno. But it's a running pattern in this storyline where the only alleged witnesses are folks who've already moved away from the area or are military/cop connected.. plus Leon gets pretty political at the end here..for a non political guy.. and seems to be somewhat hostile toward police.. I mean cops asked him what's in his garage..gunman's on the loose but he doesn't ask them to search his property to make sure the gunman's not lurking around..after all his gf is in this guy's house right? Maybe I'm alone in thinking that Leon's own depiction of himself and what went down actually fit the rcmp profile for the shooter better than Gabe wortman doesJust ain't adding up. Something's off
3
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Jarvis Church  and I'm not saying Leon was the shooter by any means..I'm saying that by his own words here...he'da made a hella Denny suspect had wortman lived through this.. circumstantially speaking
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Mike Jones  lol so I'm right on the money huh?🤭😷Shush
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Lil Miss Sew It All  that's right Any investigator or lawyer worth their salt will advise to leave personal emotion out of it
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Lil Miss Sew It All  I know it's not what RCMP are claiming
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Lil Miss Sew It All  yeah I honestly believe this was a case of certain individuals being targeted for a specific reason ...possibly the uncooperative property owners who don't wish to sell out to the oceanfront infastructure agenda..possibly whistleblowers ..possibly a combination of both..possibly none of the above but you're right on the mark when you say that the more murder victims the more confusing and the more difficult that makes it to sort out motives and intended targets etc. The perfect crime involves killing someone you've personally never met or known. No motive=No Investigation
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @Lil Miss Sew It All  PS moops like Mike jones up there are here attempting to discredit distract and dissuade. None of it works
 
 
 
 
 

Tuesday, 12 July 2022

Relatives of N.S. mass shooting victims say their lawyers should be allowed to question gunman's spouse

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:11:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Palango Methinks Madame Hupman asked
some clever questions today N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of messages received, this automatic response
informs you that your email has been received and will be reviewed in
a timely manner.
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6ri5-fMbzE&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells

 


 

MCC - DAY 47 - BRENDA "BOE" FORBES

482 views
Streamed live 6 hours ago

3.41K subscribers

 

20 Comments

David Amos
Did I hear you say that you have lawyers in your family? If that it is so then it explains to me why you have been playing dumb with me Correct?
 
NS Bluenose
He had alway, from about the third stream stated he comes from family of lawyers. If you have been following along you well know he is far from stupid. He is one smart cookie, watch and learn. He is the only one who will find and get the answers with help from people who want the truth.
5
Highlighted reply
David Amos
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown Federal Court File No.T-1557-15
 
 
 
 
 
David Amos
Methinks Madame Hupman asked some clever questions today N'esy Pas?
 
Big Fun Garage
Je ne comprends pas.
 
David Amos
 @Big Fun Garage  Of that I have no doubt
 
beth lynch
BF appears seriously ill, not credible, and laying the tracks for DV for LB. Sounds to me she was, and still is obsessed with GW and watched everything from her deck. Maybe he rejected her, we'll never know the truth. She spoke on behalf of many people , but had no proof, all hearsay. (Just my opinion)
 
 
 
 
 
Judy Brown
2:50 - 2:51 We'd stash money up there and guns. Heard it mentioned at the time she said it, just wanted to time stamp it.
 
 
 
 
Denise
Brenda obviously has Parkinson or louy body dementia. Doesn't surprise me the rcmp would lie about her report because they didn't follow up. And I've had an ex setting outside my house and it's very intimidating and scary.
 
 
 
 
 
tinycha0s
keeeeeepppo gooooiiinnngggg
 
David Amos
David Amos RCMP YouTube
 
 
 
 
 
Denise
I don't see why you think she wouldn't think he was dangerous and why you are so against her?
 
NS Bluenose
Not against her, she seen nothing. No different then someone saying you did something without seen anything. Go through his old streams of her and he explains what she has to say it. Not what she seen she seen nothing. She is in with the coverup.
 

MCC - DAY 47 - BRENDA "BOE" FORBES

106 watching now
Started streaming 3 hours ago
 
 
 
3.41K subscribers
Nosy Scotian For us all ol MacDonald
Julia Rock She doesn’t remember her interviews.
David Amos The plot thickens
 
Little Grey Cells Illegally running databases .... THANK YOU!
GLenn B wtf lying witnesses
Ash Lunn I'm sure your neighbors thank Boe for running their names in that adatbase too
JJ are we wrapping it up early day
Little Grey Cells VERY RELIABLE.... CSI
Truth InAll Lies down in print forever!
Julia Rock Happy hour now!
Little Grey CellsBRENDA CSI FORBES
 
David Amos https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/07/relatives-of-ns-mass-shooting-victims.html
David Amos Already done 

David Amos​ Why am I the odd man out??? Could it be this old file https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right

Oh Dear
 https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featur....
SadMafioso Tim Bousquet is such a joke at this point.

David Amos ​Methinks anyone can go to 19 minutes for a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vtp75VeOAk

David Amos Yawn
 
 
 
 
 

7) Je Ne Comprends Pas (Les Conflits d'Intérêts)

344 views
Premiered May 29, 2021
25DislikeShare
175 subscribers
Big Fun Garage Back-Up Channel on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-1347083 7) 
 
Je Ne Comprends Pas (Les Conflits d'Intérêts) - 
Big Fun Garage (Rumble Link): https://rumble.com/vt4lgg-7-je-ne-com...
 
 
Highlighted reply
Tired there, big fella, n'est pas?
 
 @Big Fun Garage  Methinks you are emulating Agent Margaritaville's style and making fun of mine N'esy Pas? 

Big Fun Garage
Sorry, but the QAnon turnoff was the previous exit.
 
David Amos
 @Big Fun Garage  Yea Right Hell you don't even have the balls to use your name just like your hero Brummell never would until the warrant went out for his arrest
 
Big Fun Garage
You'll never catch me, copper! 😆

 
 
 
 
 

6) Everyday (Seems To Be Getting Longer)

1,002 views
Premiered May 3, 2021
175 subscribers
Big Fun Garage Back-Up Channel on Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-1347083 
 
 6) Everyday (Seems To Be Getting Longer) - Big Fun Garage (Rumble Link): https://rumble.com/vt4lr7-6-everyday-...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:31:54 -0300
Subject: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of my sister and
her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied receiving this email
To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Sean.Fraser"
<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>,
"mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Moiz.Karimjee"<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>,
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>

However the former Attorney General refused to look on the internet to
verify what I said was true. So I gave up on his bullshit and told him
to answer me in writing because I could easily the lawyer got the
damned email. Lockyer just refused to admit it tis all.

Go Figure Why I brought this up today
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzms5ivv5DE 
 

MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS

179 watching now
Started streaming 2 hours ago
3.42K subscribers 


 ---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:53:43 -0400
Subject: Hey There Jeska Grue.and James Lockyer RE Federal Court File
No T-1557-15 I just called both of you about our common concerns about war
To: heythere@jeskagrue.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca, james.lockyer@umoncton.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca,
Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca, greg.thompson2@gnb.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com,
news@dailygleaner.com, Marc.Leger@gnb.ca, lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca,
infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca, briangallant10@gmail.com,
serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, greg.byrne@gnb.ca

I tried to explain now go figure things out for yourselves

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/armoured-car-cougar-sackville-memorial-park-1.5178986

Controversial armoured vehicle to be set up in Sackville Memorial
Park, upsets residents

While residents agree veterans deserve to be commemorated, some worry
the armoured vehicle glorifies war
Tori Weldon · CBC News · Posted: Jun 18, 2019 7:08 AM AT

"Jeska Grue, whose backyard backs onto the park, said what's already
there is plenty.

"I don't feel that it's the best way for a memorial park [to]
commemorate veterans and those affected by war."

Grue said an armoured vehicle could be an upsetting symbol for people
who have first-hand experience with war.

Her grandfather served in the Second World War, where he worked as a
tank mechanic.

"He did suffer from [post-traumatic stress disorder] and alcoholism
for the rest of his life," she said. "To me, that's the memory that it
draws."

Grue said refugees starting a new life in Sackville may also be
troubled by the armoured vehicle sitting in the middle of town.

But Jim Lockyer, honorary colonel of the 8th Canadian Hussars, said
the Cougar should act as a way to commemorate previous battles.

"This is not glorifying war, if anything it's a memento to discourage it."

He's toured fields in Italy where soldiers belonging to the 8th
Canadian Hussars lost their lives fighting during the Second World
War.

"There are young men, 18 to 25 years old, one of whom was Stedman
Henderson from Moncton, who again did not come home and they're still
there," he said.

"So it's a testimonial to their contribution."


 90 Comments


David Amos
Methinks anyone can Google "Fundy Royal Debate" then go to the 28
minute mark and listen closely N'esy Pas?

John Smith
Reply to @David Amos: david do you always ref your public speaking
engagements because your not permitted to think and speak of them out
loud in a public square maybe try a jesters hat traditionally they
were permitted to criticize the king and aristocrats

David Amos
Reply to @john smith: Methinks you should finally read my lawsuit
(Federal Court File No T- 1557-15)Paragraph 83 would be a could place
t start with regards to this issue N'esy Pas?

https://twitter.com/jeskagrue

https://jeskagrue.ca/info

 CONTACT/LOCATION

heythere@jeskagrue.ca

902-880-4783

JG lives very close to the Waterfowl Park.

James E. Lockyer, Q.C.
Université de Moncton
Professeur:
Faculté de droit
Edifice A.J. Cormier
Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9
Phone: 506-863-2134
Fax: 506-858-4534
Email: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
Subject: You wished to speak with me
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the years.


As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
productive use of either of our time.


If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
given due consideration.


Sincerely,


Charles Murray

Ombud NB

Acting Integrity Commissioner




>>>
>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:48:58 -0400 (EDT)
>>> From: "David Raymond Amos"davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>> Subject: I already know that you are as crooked as Hell Mr Leger. I am
>>> fishing for an honest cop not another corrupt bureaucrat. i am just
>>> proving that you know the truth Get it?
>>> To: Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>> CC: Day.S@parl.gc.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca,
>>> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
>>> infomorning@moncton.cbc.ca, infomorning@halifax.cbc.ca,
>>> webo@xplornet.com, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, samperrier@hotmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, amerrino@gmail.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com,
>>> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, rfowlo@comcast.net, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, pcollin@cpa-acp.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>>>
>>> Subject: Mr. Amos
>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:41:22 -0300
>>> From: "Leger, Marc (DPS/MSP)"Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>> To: "David Raymond Amos"davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>> David Amos,
>>>
>>> I am not able to address your concerns.
>>>
>>> Your calls and emails are not welcome and I would like you to stop
>>> communicating with me by phone and email
>>>
>>> Marc Léger
>>> Deputy Minister / Sous-ministre
>>> Public Safety / Sécurité publique
>>> (506) 453-7412 marc.leger@gnb.ca
>>> Working together to build a safer New Brunswick / Travaillons ensemble
>>> pour bâtir un Nouveau-Brunswick plus sûr
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
>> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
>> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
>> as usual
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> (Français à suivre)
>>
>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>
>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>> ‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>
>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
>> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
>> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
>> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, John.McNair@snb.ca,
>> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
>> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>>
>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>>  Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I.                    Introduction
>>
>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III.               Issue
>>
>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV.              Analysis
>>
>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>
>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V.                 Conclusion
>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>>
>> https://www.facebook.com/johnwilliamsonNB/photos/a.848901995163272.1073741826.172576949462450/1765074580212671/?type=3
>>
>> John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick
>> Southwest
>> May 17 at 12:48pm ·
>>
>> Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
>> the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.
>>
>> Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
>> issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
>> Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
>> 2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
>> that his local campaign was strong.
>>
>> How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
>> John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
>> here: https://donate.conservative.ca/membership/
>>
>> There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
>> be made, and events already planned.
>>
>> Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
>> 506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!
>>
>> Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
>> ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.
>>
>> And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
>> and to learn about upcoming events.
>>
>> Go John! And Vote John W!
>>
>> Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
>> Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
>> federal politics
>> CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT | Last Updated: May 28
>> Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he
>> won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)
>>
>> New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its
>> highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.
>>
>> Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead
>> jump into federal politics.
>>
>> Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA
>> said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who
>> beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.
>>
>> "It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong
>> voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my
>> heart.
>>
>> "I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's
>> very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis,
>> I want to move on."
>>
>> Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
>> riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
>>
>> Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative
>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes
>> part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>
>>     Health critic slams 'gutting' of top doctor's office
>>
>>     Blaine Higgs faces internal PC dissent over appointment
>>
>> That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John
>> Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the
>> riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding
>> will nominate their candidate June 28.
>>
>> Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton.
>> The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with
>> national organizations that advocate for veterans.
>>
>> "I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he
>> said.
>>
>>     Blaine Higgs wins N.B. PC leadership race on 3rd ballot
>>
>>     Tory leadership hopefuls scramble to be 'second choice' of rivals'
>> supporters
>>
>> Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC
>> leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under
>> Higgs.
>>
>> Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and
>> the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of
>> becoming a minister.
>>
>> But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it
>> does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go
>> another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my
>> options would be limited after that."
>>
>> The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him
>> realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.
>>
>> Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
>> years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
>> Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
>> Fredericton for the 2008 election.
>>
>> After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
>> Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
>> the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
>> defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.
>>
>> Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive
>> Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>>
>> In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the
>> first ballot out of seven candidates.
>>
>> Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial
>> party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>
>> "It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre
>> candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:37:04 -0400
>>> Subject: Birth Certificates of David and Max Amos
>>> To: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Assistant (Property): Samantha Williams
>>>
>>> Direct Line: (506) 648-0373
>>> Email: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: mike gauvin <mikegauvin@live.ca>
>>> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 01:29:25 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: 83 Valley Road FYI this is a document I may employ BTW I
>>> am in Saint John tommorrow attending a hearing at the EUB
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Tomorrow Iam going to talk to a guy that should do it.
>>> ______________________________
__
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: October 11, 2018 11:38:58 AM
>>> To: mike gauvin; swilliams; serge.gauvin; mrichard; serge.rousselle;
>>> david.eidt
>>> Cc: David Amos; greg.byrne; brian.gallant; David.Coon;
>>> kris.austin@gnb.ca; blaine.higgs; robert.gauvin@gnb.ca
>>> Subject: Re: 83 Valley Road FYI this is a document I may employ BTW I
>>> am in Saint John tommorrow attending a hearing at the EUB
>>>
>>> http://www.legaldeeds.com/Interface/Services/Conveyances/Canada/NB/contract_of_purchase_and_sale_of_real_property/questionnaire.php
>>>
>>> New Brunswick Contract of Purchase and Sale of Real Property will
>>> provide you with a custom completed contract of purchase and sale of
>>> real property used in the sale of residential or recreational real
>>> estate in New Brunswick. This document is a must for anyone buying or
>>> selling a home or lot privately in New Brunswick.
>>>
>>> By simply answering a few questions our service will produce for you
>>> an online custom completed contract, ready to be signed by the buyer
>>> and the seller.
>>>
>>> This document includes simple and straight forward instructions to
>>> enable you to execute quickly and effortlessly. A subject removal form
>>> is also included for your convenience. The cost of the personalized
>>> Contract of Purchase and Sale is $15.00, payable in Canadian dollars.
>>> Within a few minutes, you will receive your completed PDF documents by
>>> email.
>>>
>>> To proceed, complete the entries.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/10/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Obviously I have the same problem with every lawyer in New Brunswick.
>>>>
>>>> If you still wish to follow though on the deal. I will do as I
>>>> promised and pay you in full and get you to swear out and purchase and
>>>> sale agreement properly witnessed by SNB and handle this matter
>>>> myself.
>>>>
>>>> On 10/10/18, mike gauvin <mikegauvin@live.ca> wrote:
>>>>> Mosher Chedore replied to me that it's a conflict and cannot represent
>>>>> me.
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>> Sent: October 9, 2018 9:57:18 AM
>>>>> To: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca; mikegauvin@live.ca
>>>>> Cc: David Amos
>>>>> Subject: I have yet to receive a response Why?
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:37:04 -0400
>>>>> Subject: Birth Certificates of David and Max Amos
>>>>> To: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca
>>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Assistant (Property): Samantha Williams
>>>>>
>>>>> Direct Line: (506) 648-0373
>>>>> Email: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: mike gauvin <mikegauvin@live.ca>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:56:14 +0000
>>>>> Subject: Re: Hey Kyle read real slow
>>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey David, I tried to call Reid, no avail. I will call that Serge
>>>>> Gauvin guy Monday morning, this is getting ridiculous. I would just
>>>>> prefer to go through the proper legal channels.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yours Truly, Michael Gauvin
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzms5ivv5DE 
 

MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS

179 watching now
Started streaming 2 hours ago
3.42K subscribers
 
 
Welcome to live chat! Remember to guard your privacy and abide by our community guidelines.
 
 
StrawberrymochigunMorning Seamus
JJpuff party @Julia Rock
Pioneer DriverThe disappointment...oops day...we have all been waiting for.....LOL
brickleberryMorning all
Bushbaby _627Good morning everyone
InvasiononeMorning all
What TheHeckNSGod Bless all the families today! ❤
Becca AMorning ,, let the games begin !
Snippy PinkyLisa caused her OWN TRAUMA.. SHE COULD HAVE LEFT AND WITH THE FINANCES TOO!!! NO EXCUSES FOR LISA!!! SORRY!!! PLUS LOOK AT THOSE SISTERS... THEY APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN WILLING TO TAKE HER IN IF SHE NEED
But she never runs to her sisters UNTIL 23 are DEAD! THEN WOE IS ME!
 
Snippy PinkyNO the window in the cruiser is PATENTED means impossible to breach safety... PATENT MEANS ITS LEGALLY IMPOSSIBLE TO OUTSMART! PATENT... I CANT SAY IT ENOUGH
 
Snippy PinkyFAMILIES SHOULD SUE.... ITS PATENTED... I JUST TRIED TO GET THROUGH ONE WITH TWO YORK COPS. THEY OBLIGED ME AND LET ME TRY TO ESCAPE... I AM 110lbs 5ft2 and PETITE... JUST MY HEAD! NOTHING ELSE!
Snippy PinkyLIKE THE PATENT CLAIMS 
 
SadMafiosoYou can play my video on Banfields shoes. 39 large paces apart.
Snippy PinkyIM SMALLER... AND EX GYMNAST CAN CONTOURT STILL... NO CONTOURTIONIST COULD DO IT EITHER!
Snippy PinkyYes the jacket has a YOKE neckline and it does give the effect of slimming
SadMafiosoCorrect. It's staged, the RCMP reenactment.
 
SadMafiosoMy stream is frozen.... WTF

Snippy PinkyYes and its difficult to see
Snippy PinkyNERVOUS OF REPRICUSIONS from POLICE... POSSIBLY?
Snippy Pinkyvery nervous to tell the truth
Snippy PinkyWhat? WHAT DID SHE DO WITH HER TIGHTS?
 
Snippy PinkyPISSES ME OFF AND MAKES ME LOSS EVEN MORE FAITH IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM AND SOCIETY
!
Snippy PinkyI gotta try this... I have lots of tights to try with....
 
SadMafiosoHad to reboot.
Snippy PinkyBET YA IT SHOWS LISA HELPING...
 
Snippy Pinky@SadMafioso I have to logg out when hes live more then i am inn... YOu having problems too
 
Snippy Pinkyblue shirt and similar patch... AT LEAST IN ONTARIO
 
Snippy Pinkydifferent blue cotton.. POLICE DARKER corrections LIGHTER
Snippy PinkyI personally if I was the OFFICER that got her STATEMENT..I would have slipped that one in probably about 5 times in the hour to two at play
Snippy PinkySee what she says each time
Snippy PinkyThat NIGHT STAND I TELL YA....
Snippy PinkyI stayed once. PT IT OUT... IF IT DOESN'T GO... YOU SHOULD!!!!! TRUST ME!!!!!
Snippy PinkyThese items are usually tracked unless stolen... FOR EX. I WONT LIE... I ONCE HAD MY CAR BROKEN INTO WITH A BIKE ON THE TRUNK AND I HAD LAW ENFORCMENT EQUIP. STOLEN FROM MY CAR. NOBODY IN COM. KNEW..
Snippy PinkySHUSH INSTEAD OF SCREAM EVERYWHERE AND FIND... ITS SHUHHHH YOU NEVER LOST THAT OK!!!! BUT YOU DID AND ITS GONE AND ITS REPORTED!!! YA KNOW WHAT I MEAN JELLY BEANS, soft inside but tough on the outter
Snippy Pinkylike my ballistics was at large in community.. NOTHING LOL!!! nobody had a clue someone now had a ballistics vest that shouldn't and that stolen too sew.... just saying! SMALL LOL BUT MENS!
Becca ASnippy what was your previous profession
Snippy Pinkymanagement civil sesrvant.
SadMafiosoDid everyone forget about Peter Allan Griffon and G-Spot Haircuts (Banfield’s) all of a sudden? WTF.
Snippy Pinkybylaw enforcement and CITY HALL SECURITY... I traiined for others... but mainly PROFFESSIONAL SECURITY OF AT ELITE LEVELS SUCH AS PERIMETER INSTITUTE!
Snippy PinkyI am trained for interrogations at your BORDER in my opinion, I was training FOR CSIS!
Snippy Pinkyhahaha thats what I and I bet lisa and i bet the BENZ dealership is excited for... BENZ DEALERSHIP, SHE AINT WORTH IT... SHES looking forward to that too based on how she answered! then rolled eyes
Becca ARcmp have the security footage from everything that happened at the warehouse and on the property . No excuse
Snippy Pinkysat back mad like... BENZ WANNA GO WITH ME TOO, GABS GONE NOW!!!! LOL
InvasiononeIf the Angel argument actually happened, which I’m not sure it did, Lisa likely got mad that someone would dare think that SHE was the problematic one in the relationship, and not Gabe
Nosy ScotianG spot burned. what a coincidence
Macdonald DonI heard Seamus say the name Hudson...who was he referring to ?
Julia RockInvasionone - I agree!
Snippy PinkyQUICK APT... NOPE, sorry always booked between clients sew you cant stay and chat thanks... I have those I like to stay... they will SAVE ME
SadMafiosoThis case is going to improve CSI ratings, lol.
Snippy PinkyI TRUST THE GUY THAT DEALS WITH CARS ALL DAY EH... LIKE IF I SAW IT.. YOU BETTER TAKE MY WORD AS THE AUTO UPHOLSTERER WORKING ON CARS OVER LISA's... IF CAR GUY SAYS... BUT YA KNOW... lisa and money
Snippy PinkyOMG dont sue me lulu lemon china did you worse... lol if your here lol you still need that special coverstitch machine 🙂
Snippy Pinkyoh god is lulu lemon patented lol i better check... lol
NovaScotiaFreckles Is it weird seeing her in person nosy?
Snippy Pinky@Nosy Scotian your there LIVE!?
Becca AMoeny pigs
Becca AMoney
Snippy Pinkyexactly
Snippy PinkyCovid has some swine flu attributes LOL!!!! 🙂
Snippy PinkyI got SWINE FLU when I worked at the CITY. SERIOUSLY, I AM NOT THE DOCTOR! CITY GOT MAD, I GOT LET GO SHORTLY AFTER!!!! LOL COVID... AND THE GREAT RESIGNATIONS LOL LOL LOL
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Snippy PinkyI miss my partner agent margaritaville

Snippy PinkyMargaritaville is TECHNICALLY my fiancé if they ever FREE HIM!!!!
 
Snippy PinkyThey want me too... I AM BEFORE THE COURTS NOW!!! AND NOW AS I SHOULD BE!!!
Snippy PinkyNOT8
 
Snippy PinkyNOT* lol blonde
 
Macdonald DonSnippy Pinky...Yes, I knew who you were by your 'sew' references
Becca AGrow op?
Snippy Pinkybreak time for me... be back 🙂 YEAH TO BE HONEST IT WAS JUST BECAUSE AUTO CORRECT WHEN ITS SEW NOT SO MAKES INSTRUCTIONS JUST TERRIBLE BUT NOW ITS FUN!!!!
Peter LambRadio/ scanner code/ mutual aid access Comm 00051960
Julia RockI don’t think you can own a road it is likely Unassumed.
The Honkeningthat's normal in the Maritimes. private road on priv land, but if built gov wide the province will plow it
Julia RockYou likely look after it yourself.
Nic ColeIf you own it you have to do snow removal and repairs
Becca ANobody else finds it messed up the property that was torched and purchased by gov is where the new road is being built
CSE I.T. Departmentmy uncle had to liquidate my grandparents estate to pay off their debts before the LTC would accept them
Becca AIs the new road staying a private road or gov road ?
Julia Rock[message retracted]
Oh DearTo save family members from paying estate taxes some people will transfer all property into their children's names especially if they are going to a nursing home
Becca ARoads have to have 3 or more houses to be gov road
Mirage MysteriesI walked through the woods but didn’t see any signs saying keep out
Macdonald DonSeamus...GW did have some business holdings with colleague Tom Pattenton, remember ?
Judy BrownI will find out the name of people who sold 150 acres (I think) on PBR after the mass murder
SadMafioso@Mirage Mysteries I have a ton of photos of "No Trespassing" signs all over 136 OBD. That whole community had GTFO signs. No joke.
Mirage MysteriesThe gov signs they put up around Portapique right after the massacre I found extremely weird..
Mirage MysteriesI was saying about the new road through the woods. Did you also see them there? @sad
Mizz FoxxPut your glasses on gramps, you keep misreading people's comments lol
Becca ATransferred to Lisa maccully , wonder if there’s more to it than just a private sale
What TheHeckNSIt works like a condo board
NovaScotiaFreckles I was reading some texts between the rcmp and Maureen and did they actually give that money in the yard back to Lisa?
Becca AEveryone usually pays an annual fee who lives on the road for maintenance and upkeep
CSE I.T. Department@Sadmafioso I'm surprised they didn't slap no drone signs everywhere to keep Indoblue out 🤣🤣🤣
Becca ABut why is the road going directly through the property where he supposedly burnt all the bodies
Julia RockOver an hour now.
What TheHeckNSThe private road works as a condo board for residents living on the road
What TheHeckNSyou pay fees for snow removal, maintenance etc
Becca AAnd didn’t they start building the road while the government still owned the property ?
SadMafioso@CSE I.T. Department To my limited memory, there were no drone flying measures early own when it was all still on lockdown.
RobertThe only way this makes sense is if he was a police informant. And if he’s not Lisa needs to be cuffed immediately as she’s trying to leave. No excuse as to why she couldn’t of had him jailed long ago
Oh DearThe house is empty in the real estate photos I have from 2015
Mirage MysteriesThere was remnants of charred wood on that road too! Like a circle for a court then a burnt wood pile in the middle. Gave me a weird feeling..
Julia RockLying about where the cop car was driven and who drove.
SadMafiosoF-150. HUGE PROBLEM.
nikki lewisim not buying all that she has stated so far
Julia RockGabes cellphone?
What TheHeckNSPROBLEM: SHE physically SHOT the guns
CSE I.T. Department@Little Grey Cells it was with their lawyer and insurance lawyer's permission they were both suffering dementia and deemed incompetent unfortunately
Invasionone“When were these pictures taken” “It would say on my phone” and then no one clearly states when they were taken
Nancy Macgillivarylack of emotion when speaking victims names.
Julia RockGetting through a silent patrolman?
NOVA SCOTIA GROWN61Not until they seize
What TheHeckNSPROBLEM: She discouraged him from obtaining a Firearms Licence - this could have been her way out
What TheHeckNSCBSA would have caught him and he’d be behind bars if lucky
Oh DearLisa's
Julia RockGuys? What guys?
The Honkeningcouldnt locate the exact ebay purchase for silent patrolman, but that company has 4 models so should be easy to get specs and compare
Mizz FoxxMaureen will just say that Lisa needs to go. In the news, Maureen said they retraumatized her by surprising her with a tv crew for the recap, she thought it was just gonna be Vardy apparently 🤨
InvasiononeHe’s using the badge and card to get discounts and out of tickets, he has guns and no PAL, he holds a gun to her head, he “collects” cop paraphernalia, assaults her in public, but “he wasn’t a danger”
Julia RockWhere was the cop car driven? How often?
Julia RockKnew of illegal guns.
nikki lewisaided smuggling of guns
Julia RockDidn’t know the back roads but is very knowledgeable about the area.
Becca AMcc needs the security footage from the rcmp , why aren’t the mcc requesting it
Julia RockShe lied to police.
Mirage MysteriesWhat was the cult you mentioned GW was in an in an email? Are you also in said cult?
Julia Rock1 hr 9 mins.
The Honkeningall PC's have four cameras. when do we get that for 10pm to 12pm next day...
Little Grey CellsPardon? Am I in a cult?
Little Grey CellsUmmmm, no
Nancy Macgillivarysee if he swears her in now
Oh DearParty at Sutherland lake, leaving driving 30 minutes to Portapique and then going back to Sutherland lake.
Becca AMirage that’s wishful thinking , they didn’t even bo thy er to ask her about the hidden room with toilet
Nic ColeNo they mean Lisa talking about the cult
Little Grey CellsoOOOOO lolz, Lisa B LMFAO
StrawberrymochigunMirage are you in a cult?
Macdonald DonLB would have told her sister(s) of GW's gun threats, so they would have been making nightly wellness calls to her....when she wasn't responding that night, THEY would have called the RCMP
Darcy Dobsonis this thing on
Oh DearNot going to swear her in again????
CSE I.T. Department@Little Grey Cells tell your her shoulda bought a RCMP Ford Taurus they are magical cars 🤣🤣🤣🤣 who needs oil the pushbar will cool the engine
Strawberrymochigunlmao
Truth InAll4
Julia RockNo regard for law!
Truth InAll4
Strawberrymochiguncults
Julia RockNo regard for justice.
Chris LeeAt the very least remind her still under oath wtf
UncleBlazerNo Peter Griffon?
Mirage MysteriesYou mentioned Gabriel was in a cult. What one Would that be? What other members do you know of that were in that cult?
The Honkeningpeter griffon did the decals on the bumper...he worked at a sign shop.
nikki lewiswhat do you know versus what he told you ?
Chris LeeThis is a f'in joke
UncleBlazerPeter Griffon never spent time on the car with Gabe?
Julia RockThat left shoulder is some itchy.
Little Grey CellsHow well do you know her? When was the last time you spoke?
Judy BrownKeith and Cheryl Jeffers sold 155 acres right along the Bay
Oh DearOMG really don't ask question just lead her into what you want to hear
Julia RockPlease answer yes or no. No head bobbing.
Becca AWtf
Oh DearUnreal
Little Grey CellsWhile in Dartmouth by yourself .... asking to come up to see Gab?
Julia RockSign language lady cannot hear an affirmative head shake.
Truth InAllAsk Lisa if she had a problem with jealousy herself!
Oh DearWTF is this crap it is just sick
D 2CBig day 4 softball?!
What TheHeckNSWhat about his birthday party
Chris LeeIt is gross
InvasiononeBrenda didn’t witness ANYTHING
Mirage MysteriesRubbing her own shoulder self comforting.. which could indicate a lie
What TheHeckNSwhat about having a good time with others when the US folks came to NS
SadMafiosoMCC is serving up some serious Kool-Aid for us to drink. DON'T DRINK THIS TAINED PUNCH.
The Honkeningwhen do they ask about the day trip destination
MHRubbing her shoulder because her tan is flaking
JJso it's okay to bring up past abuse and details but not the night of April 18th
Macdonald DonsEAMUS...i BELIEVE THEY HAD SOME PROPEETY IN THE FREDERICTON AREA
Julia RockGlynn and Brenda. So reliable.
Little Grey CellsBday where you don't invite his friends... that wouldn't cause a problem with abuser.... not at all DERP
Julia RockStar witnesses.
What TheHeckNSYOU threw the BIG party for his bday
Oh DearThis is BS
MarshaMc@Sad she meant hot tub parties
JJunprepared..silly lawyer
SadMafioso@Oh Dear 💯
Oh Dearopps that is not the direction I want to lead you
Julia RockHe showed everyone his cop car and guns at this party.
Janes BlondShes not telling the full Angel story
Nic ColeHaha true Oh Dead
Nic ColeDear
lilybalm66Really prepared
CSE I.T. Departmentif Gab was a CI it would have been a handler picking up the cash at Brinks not the informant. that's why you will never ever see the FINTRAC record cuz payment authorizer, issuer of cash is listed
nikki lewisperhaps MCC you ashould have let lawyers ask theirown damn quesrionsa
MHFire the damned lawyer
Mirage Mysteries“We just want to make sure we keep this train wreck on track”
Julia RockYou failed for the respectful job.
Nancy Macgillivarynow they are worried about being respectful
D 2Cgotta coach the softball gently speaking softly
Little Grey CellsDid he get treatment?
Julia RockDescribe your relationship with alcohol.
Oh DearMy prayers for he families of the 23 this has to be so hard
Chris LeeCan't hurt anyones feelings
Little Grey CellsDid he ever see a doctor about his alcoholosm?
Chris LeeOh here we go now is alcohols fault
Darcy DobsonGillian honestly kills me. She even corrects the witnesses grammar
CSE I.T. Department@Little Grey Cells sooooo she never saw him build the car, yet states he built it himself, how does she know it wasn't built for him by RCMP 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Julia RockLisa how much do you drink.
UncleBlazerNever sold drugs in Portapique and Economy?
StrawberrymochigunThey better not blame just drugs again ffs
SadMafiosoLelesh.
Macdonald DonA couple of years ago, in the Discord, it was mentioned that the RCMP instructed GW that his cruiser would have to be kept on a trolly...
Little Grey CellsNova Stone?
Little Grey CellsLolz
UncleBlazerStone or stoned?
Truth InAllLol!
Oh DearNo mention about liver problems in medical records
Julia RockStone or stoned?
SadMafiosoGLENHOLME QUARY DOESNT HAVE FLAT STONE FFS!!!! I GET ROCK FROM THWRE!!!!!! WTF
Truth InAllBrenda misunderstood.
SadMafiosoTHEY HAVE ROUND WASHED STONE.
CSE I.T. Department@Little Grey Cells comm 0050847 only trip to dr mentioned they both got check ups only thing mentioned was Gabs elevated blood pressure
NovaScotiaFreckles She’s got quite the little attitude in her answers
SadMafiosoNO FLAT STONE. YPU GET THAT OUT OF WENTWORTH QUARY - LAFARGE!!!!
Snippy PinkyKnow Lisa, what your giving now after the fact being ACCEPTED or anything else is CRAZY TALK!
Nosy Scotianfun fact Lisa has a beautiful tan
Julia RockNone of this was cause for concern?
Darcy DobsonThey are not going to ask her any real questions the commissioners will not allow it
lilybalm66A great life but I was abused
Little Grey CellsLike repaying loans.... DERP
Snippy PinkyI love FUN FACTS... YOURS IS CORRECT!!! BETTER THEN MINE AND I LITERALLY AM PUT OUT BEING CARED FOR THESE DAYS LOL IN HIDING ISH LOL
Chris Lee@nosy nice tan and flow
Little Grey CellsShut it down
Mirage MysteriesHe would have a had a better chance of survival with a “hostage”
Nancy Macgillivaryomg
Becca AHe deboned ppl, I must have heard that wrong
The Honkeninghow much for those sad faces on her flanks. i want to buy one.
Snippy Pinkywhen you forget its because your micromanaging a lie your concealing or from saying something
NovaScotiaFreckles Nosy yes she does
Julia RockReport him?
Little Grey CellsSo you take a break from your "abuser"... DERP
nikki lewisdid you report your worries to anyone?
Snippy Pinkyhave to rewatch this after especially since i keep getting the boot anyways lol
nikki lewiserm that would be a no
What TheHeckNSSee how she says … I didn’t want to hear it
LucySailing into the afternoon…. Haven’t learned much new intel… outside of LBs gaffes “our business” “our home” “his police car” “his guns” “my phone”
What TheHeckNSSo saucy!
Snippy PinkyBUT SHE DOESN'T LEAVE!!!!
Little Grey CellsBest go stay with your sister or go to Dartmouth by yourself
What TheHeckNSLike provoking!
Strawberrymochigun'parden' it was quite clear what she asked
Char DayzIf she was abused would he allow her to call him crazy and walk away??
Chris LeeOnly your family.....nice
InvasiononeKilling his family? Shooting cops?
nikki lewisstop with these stupid closed questions
MHNotice she nods yes and says no
Snippy Pinkyyes I hear her attributes similar @What TheHeckNS
Jaimenot even an ounce upset that the massacre's happened
Little Grey CellsPOLICE BADGE??? She just said it
InvasiononeDid she not hear about him threatening his father or shooting a cop?
Snippy Pinkyhahaha
What TheHeckNS@Snippy Pinky it’s telling
Darcy DobsonHer family sits alive today and mine is broken. That irony is not lost on me
SadMafiosoI thought it was a EHS badge, you silly lawyer...
Snippy PinkyTHE ELITE DOOMS DAY THING LOL THEY PLUGGED AWHILE LOL HMMM....
David AmosMethinks Agent Margaritaville loves to play the wicked game N'esy Pas?
JJno threats to anyone but her and her families..23 ppl are gone
Snippy PinkyVERY TELLING @What TheHeckNS
Little Grey CellsMaybe she got some injections Mirage
Snippy Pinkyyes shes frustrated by being there like i bet she whined the whole drive there and the remainder of the evening (poor sisters) about how ptless that was of her etc.
Snippy Pinkynothing about the actual VICTIMS!!!!
SadMafioso@David Amos Je Nas Comprend Pas.

 
 
 
 
 
Judy BrownWill Leon testify?
Julia RockJust I thought I read next week. I could be wrong.
Snippy PinkyAFter the games LISA, WHAT DID YOU DO?
JJwhy did she need a high cost criminal lawyer right away,
Snippy PinkyCause you didn't GO IN THE FOREST PERIOD!!!! PERIOD!!! AND YOU DIDN'T GO OFF THE PATHS!!! UNLESS YOU CLEANED UP BETWEEN HIDING AND GOING TO LEONS!
Snippy PinkyBUT THEN WHERE?
Snippy PinkyI THINK SEW...
 
RobertWhy isn’t Leon being brought to testify, since he seen her with no visible injury’s, also where are the pictures of scratches or mud on her pants if she’s running and crawling through woods?
Snippy PinkyThat is why GAB SAT SEW LONG... LISA IS GETTING CLEANED UP LIKE THE GOLD DIGGER SHE IS INBETWEEN ALL THESE CASUALTIES.... I BET YA!!!!
InvasiononeIf the argument with Angel happened, which I’m not sure it did, Lisa probably got mad because someone would dare think that SHE was the problematic one in the relationship, and not Gabe
Snippy PinkyI can HEAR HER NOW... "GAB YA CANT DROP ME OFF LOOKING LIKE THIS NOW... JUST STOP AT THE WAREHOUSE PLEASE.... AND THEN AS SOON AS SHES GOOD... AND GAB THINKS ALL CLEAR... LETS GO!
Snippy PinkyIts 2022 we should be able to KNOT KNOW.... LIKE ITS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO GET AWAY WITH CRIME THESE DAYS... WE ARE INTELLECTUAL NOW SEW... SIGNS OF CLEAR COVER UP EVEN COPS KNOW IT
 
Snippy PinkyI didn't even make it living there for my first and last... HE HIT SEW FAST.... I ONLY MADE IT A MONTH AND A HALF... LOL STAY WITH ME....
Snippy PinkyThis correlates into the prisons if i had something to bet I would BET IT ALL ON IT!!!!! EVERYTHING I HAVE!!!!
SadMafioso@Strawberrymochigun 1) Get a better handle, and 2) Yeah, people how blankets hate animals are trash.
Strawberrymochigun@SadMafioso true and what do you mean by getting a better handle?
NovaScotiaFreckles I like pets but animals scare me
Snippy Pinkyyes dont trust anyone that hurts or wants to hurt animals... usually the first sign of something worse to come....
 
SadMafiosoYou're user name.
Nosy Scotianquestion. does she have tears when she does the crying thing. I'm too far back
Snippy PinkyAh... Butz the donated to me therapy cat is sew fat... sometimes it feels like a dog at my feet still lol
Strawberrymochigun@SadMafioso and what is wrong with my username
 
Snippy Pinkymy nieghbors I DO KNOW... AND THEY WENT OUT OF THEIR WAY TO GET ME A THERAPY PET... GOD LOVE COMMUNITY!!!!
 
Snippy PinkyShe wasn't in the BUSH ALL NIGHT and the clothes she wore is somewhere... where, i bet the dump with all the rest of the evidence they bulldozed
Steve MasonIs Leon testifying?
Chris LeeYa then they can say look at the rowdies shut it down
Steve Masonhe was contacted by her that night
Strawberrymochigun@ Paul Palango
.
Snippy PinkyWomen like lisa STASH make up and clothes etc EVERY WHERE GAB WAS especially since he isn't faithful... TRUST ME... A REAL WOMEN DOESN'T NEED MORE THEN ONE PURSE, LISA HAS THEM EVERYWHERE. I BET YA!
Snippy PinkyLike lisa EASILY could have had change of clothes in the vehicles... SHE IS THAT TYPE OF WOMEN!!!!
SadMafiosoBanfield has still yet to answer the MOST PIVOTAL QUESTIONS... And I assume those questions will never be asked...
Snippy PinkyPRE ADOLESCENCE! JUST CHECK THE PATENT... ITS IMPOSSIBLE!!!!
Snippy PinkyNO I TRIED.... YORK REGIONAL POLICE IN ONTARIO OBLIGED ME... I TRIED... NO!
David AmosFrom James Lockyer Date Fri, 15 Jul 2022 Subject James Lockyer an old law school classmate 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Chris Lee@Snippy I would love to hear how you get yourself in pickles. Probably very entertaining but doesn't sound much fun for you lol
JJlying ages someone
Julia RockSad are you there.
Nosy ScotianI don't see her fitting through it myself
Chris LeeWas the jeapordy theme from Nick? That was funny
CSE I.T. DepartmentI'm 6'2 210lbs and I know for a fact I can only pass my handcuffed wrists through the window. Cuz that's exactly what the window is designed for, and so cops can shoot, pepper spray or taser
NS BluenoseAaron’s teeth
Snippy PinkyMY LIFE WAS GREAT BEFORE THAT APARTMENT!!!! AMAZING!!!! NO COMPLAINTS!!!!
Snippy PinkyDoing the production covers for the upcoming 2016 LEXUS, BUSINESS WAS GOOD, I AM SINGLE AND LOVING IT, LOOKING GOOD FEELING GOOD AND THEN I RENT THAT APARTMENT... AND NO MATTER WHAT I DO. NOT STOPPING
David AmosSnippy is in quite a pickle with mean old me and my evil foes in the RCMP
SadMafioso@David Amos Don't you have an election to cut your hair for in Fundy Bay?
UncleBlazerDuplicate statements, different COMM numbers
David AmosNope
David AmosI retired
SadMafiosoFigures
 
 
 
 
 
D 2CDoes anyone else finally think "G" was "untouchable" because he was way more than just a "CI"?
Becca AHow come they don’t ask Maureen hope about the kit list and her detective steps sons dealings with wortmans she mentions ?
Snippy PinkyTHEY LOVED MY BED BEFORE!!! LOL
 
David AmosYo D2C BINGO
 
D 2Cbeen saying it from the start
SadMafioso@David Amos How much research do you got in this, other than emailing white shirts and the PMO?
Snippy Pinkyhahaha that comment... Hahaha they only attack eh when they see something they want and cant have! LOL
SadMafiosoYour internet track record is showing..
.
Snippy PinkyIt chief even at least gave a female name lol 
 
 
 
 
 
David AmosCHECK MY BLOG OBVIOUSLY I AM TALKING ABOUT YOU DUDES TODAY EH?
Snippy PinkyTakes a while to TRULY FILL THOSE BIG GREEDY BELLIES
 
Snippy PinkyI think she was in the passenger seat the entire time til the warehouse then dropped off at LEONS before Gab then continued on....
 
Snippy PinkyYes what happened LISA THAT SET HIM OFF... YOU KNOW... AND WE KNOW YOU KNOW!!!!
 
Snippy PinkyI dont get it... She says its broken and sent to the cloud but doesn't she use it for 3 calls after?
JJwtf is going on..it make no sence these lawyers aren't pushing more
Peter Byker@D 2C the contradictions are inevitable as the narrative is deeply tested.
SadMafiosoAgreed, if the lawyers are actually opposed, then they need to FIGHT.
NovaScotiaFreckles Why isn’t anyone questioning that she’s getting calls after it’s apparently broken and burnt but us?
Green Bastardthe lawyers need to stand up and get their disapproval on record. anything less is unacceptable.
InvasiononeMCC ruled yesterday that participant lawyers need to stop expecting this to function like a courtroom. Sounds like lawyers can’t get them to budge at all.
 
Snippy Pinkyexactly @Invasionone
 
Snippy PinkyHer phone would have likely had access to the security cameras too...
 
Snippy PinkyWOW
Snippy PinkyIMPOSSIBLE
InvasiononeWhy can the DOJ lawyers walk up and object to questioning like they did with Chief MacNeil but family lawyers can’t?
Snippy PinkySisters... WERE THEY LIVING IN FEAR FOR THEIR SISTERS SAFETY FROM GABRIEL?
JJthis is one-sided..the wrong side
CSE I.T. Department@Little Grey Cells comment makes total sense when Gab wanted the love of his life to run and save herself. Not very toxic masculinity abusive of Gab now is it
 
SadMafioso@little grey cells Agreed. They lawyers CAN make a stand
 
Snippy Pinkyexactly @CSE I.T. Department HE SOUNDS LIKE HE PROTECTED HER THAT EVENING KEEPING HER ALIVE!!!
SadMafiosoThey do not have good representation if they refuse to send up when asked to do so.
Snippy PinkyNOT A GOOD ABUSE NARRATIVE!
 
Snippy PinkyAnyone know what this tree looks like that lisa apparently became one with to survive the evenings events
InvasiononeNo elaboration on both the silent patrolman escape or being one with the tree. Even the MCC knows when something is too absurd to be believed.
Snippy Pinkyyup
 
Snippy PinkyLong breaks we pay for.. Man we some good to our civil servants us Canadians
 
Snippy PinkyShes looked annoyed this entire time like she feels she is being victimized by just being asked questions.
 
Snippy PinkyExactly.. Shes also now called the BENZ dealership liars as well all while its her bed of lies we must lay with... AND I DONT STAND FOR IT.. WHY IS THIS COMMISSION!
 
Snippy PinkyVERY SIMILAR HOWEVER KARLA EVENTUALLY OWNS UP TO HER ACTIONS, JUST TAKES AWHILE!
 
Snippy PinkyTara is LITERALLY SHOWING HER STRENGTH RIGHT NOW more then the legal representation!!!! GO TARA GO!!!! GOD LOVE YA!!!!
 
Snippy Pinkylol
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David AmosMy dog is wondering why I am laughing
 
Snippy PinkyDid she come in the BENZ? lol sew hard up i tells ya we are to believe lol

Snippy Pinkyher and her sister in BRAND NEW 2022 DESIGNER CLOTHING LOL... AH THIS SEAMSTRESS SEES YOUR SPENDING!!! LOL ITS MY JOB!
Snippy PinkyLisa is in a 400dollar dress alone... FYI!!!!
 
Snippy PinkyAbuse for a dress? IS THAT WHAT WE ARE TO BELIEVE? TAKE A SLAP FOR A NICE BENZ? LIKE.... IDK BUT NOT MY STYLE!!! thats for sure!
 
Snippy PinkyI am a designer myself and my most expensive dress is 400 and I ONLY HAVE IT CAUSE MY TOWER CRANE BF AT THE TIME BOUGHT IT FOR ME!~
Snippy PinkyI keep MENDING... IT CAN NOT GO ANYWHERE TOO EXPENSIVE LOL
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NovaScotiaFreckles Sorry I thought I seen something on Twitter my mistake
Snippy PinkyYOUR CHANNEL DOES GOOD WORK @SEAMUS... THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE VICTIMS REMAINING and community still grieving such a catastrophe!
CSE I.T. Departmentdid the lawyers stage the walkout to avoid showing their clients their true loyalty
🤔

 
Richard LaneBanfield only got restorative justice because the crown feels there's no 'public interest' in criminal charges for supplying bullets. wtf
Snippy PinkyThat is all LISA CARES ABOUT... HER PERSONAL LIFESTYLE!!! THAT IS IT!!!!
Snippy Pinkythank you @Char Dayz everyone of us here keeps SOME PRESSURE to TELL THE TRUTH EVENTUALLY!!!
 
Snippy Pinkyhybrid... LISA EASILY IS A HYBRID... Sets aside her victimhood for possessions therefore an accomplice in his crimes... IF ABUSE WAS THERE!!!!
 
Snippy PinkyCant say I BLAME THEM BUT MAYBE IF THEY RESPONDED BETTER WE WOULD BE HEALTHIER ON WHOLE!!!! THIS NO RESPONSE BUT PAPER LOGGING JUST AINT WORKING EH....
M UI hope after such a long break they bring Lisa back for another day of testimony.
Nanhahah, hilarious
Peter BykerIntuition leads to confirmation.
Nanhope you all have a world of sunshine and buttercups in your future, as do your female children
Truth InAllGetting close to 4:00
Mizz FoxxFemale children? lol wtf
Peter BykerUvalde
ckcan she do anything without the Banfield body guards?? t
Judy BrownNan what do you mean
Snippy Pinkylol yep wtf lol
Bushbaby _627Rehearsal must not be going well they are taking a long time
Patrick PenneyDid MCC go into witness protection..
Snippy Pinkydun dun dun.... lol
ckshe talks about being afraid to walk down street, is that not part of guilt
Snippy Pinkylol
 
Nanjust as you have all been brain washed into thinking LB was a killer too. Guess you don't know her or her family. They are not pompous liars like you want to believe.
Snippy Pinkythats called guilt yep
Snippy Pinkythat is what we call a NERVOUS TICK....
NanThis is a disgrace, to our province, the walking out and Beaton behaviour. Disgusting child like
Linda MI suspect she's afraid to run into one of us in public
Snippy PinkyGuarantee she scratches her arms all the time and bet ya they aint dry with that tan.... LOL
Green Bastardwelcome Nan
NovaScotiaFreckles What are you talking about nan?
Snippy PinkyIf it has ORGANIZED TIES... Hmmm... PLAUSIBLE SHES AFRAID BUT SHE WOULD HAVE TO TELL US THAT SEW....
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David AmosI tweet a lot too
 
Snippy PinkyHOW DO YOU NOT REMEMEBER? ANMESIA? LIKE?
Snippy PinkyHas banfield suffered many head injuries in her lifetime?
 
Snippy PinkyWow
.
Snippy PinkySURE SHE DOES SHE WAS FRIENDS WITH TWO SHE JUST FINISHED TELLING US!!!!
 
Linda MacDonaldWhy does she keep correcting herself from Gabriel to G
 
Snippy PinkyThats not strange to LISA?
 
Snippy Pinkyis this ROB GUY A CARPENTER?
 
Mirage MysteriesHow weird is that? A extremely rich man using Neighbours phones to contact his gf
CSE I.T. Departmentoooooo so she called Peter Griffin a known criminal to fetch her Gabriel
GLenn Bchar agreed she's even discusted
Snippy Pinkyyup
Snippy PinkyAND SHE DOESN'T ASK HIM TO EXPLAIN?
 
Snippy PinkySHE HAS A PAL... ITS BEEN REMOVED SINCE THIS RIGHT RCMP!!!!
 
Snippy PinkySHE IS KNOT SORRY!!!
 
Snippy PinkySHE IS SEW PETURBED THAT SHE HAS TO DO THIS!!!!
 
Snippy PinkyNo thanks.... but I am sorry to be a grammar pain LOL!!!
 
Snippy PinkyITS TOO MUCH FUN FOR ME, I AM GONNA BE SELFISH on this one... LOL IGNORE IT! LOL
 
Snippy PinkyShe doesn't SEAM to pay attention much!
 
Snippy PinkySURE SHE DOES SHE WAS FRIENDS WITH TWO SHE JUST FINISHED TELLING US!!!!
 
Julia RockGillian cut her off.
Snippy Pinkyno didn't she say he kept the orange puffy jacket over the seat for an illlusion for drivers by?!?!
 
Rebecca Jonesapparently none of these activities were strange or concerning to her ... she never would have gone to police about any of gw's activities and hobbies..
 
Snippy PinkyExactly @Rebecca Jones
 
Snippy PinkyI wanna see the tree too!!!! OH
Little Grey CellsMuted her
Snippy Pinkyhear that she was on WHAT?
Snippy PinkySAY IT LISA
 
Snippy PinkyWHAT MEDS?
 
Snippy Pinkyher nervous tick is absolutely amazing for telling when shes lying and when shes telling the truth!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David AmosI wonder if your pal Palango has called you people yet
Snippy PinkyI wonder where gab filled the replica cruisers with gas when he drove them?
Snippy PinkyCause like... COPS DONT JUST GO ANYWHERE EH!
Nancy Macgillivaryshe and sisters are watching this channel
 
Richard Lanemy niece and her husband died because she bought bullets, she ran. She's a victim of her own circumstances..
Tess NicholsonWhat did Nan say? I missed it.
RobertGetting Ammunition for GW means she literally contributed, FOH with this “I didn’t contribute” bs
Sandy Mechefskewhat is this Nan stuff?
Snippy PinkyI dont see NAN
NOVA SCOTIA GROWN61BLOCK NAN
 
NOVA SCOTIA GROWN61So block her. we don't need this in our chat
Snippy PinkyI think she was with gab til leons
JJwe shall rise above nan
cyndihey I missed the whole freak8n day except 40 mins hope we re all well
Snippy Pinkyand that is how she is sew clean and he told her that, if you want to survive stay with me and before this is over I will drop you at leons when able. SEW SHE DID
 
Snippy PinkyI will be taking this more seriously since finding out she only knew the C.O.'s!
 
Snippy PinkyBUT ALSO DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THOSE UNIFORMS LOOK LIKE?!?! OK!!!!
 
JJthat's it Julia 😉
Snippy PinkyBECAUSE ITS IMPOSSIBLE EVEN UNDER THE AGE OF 8!
 
Snippy PinkyI think Gab felt IF HE DROPPED HER AT LEONS, LEON WAS BEST TO KEEP HER SAFE AND INTO CUSTODY FOR HELP! DOESN
Snippy PinkyDOESN'T SOUND VERY ABUSIVE?!?
 
Joanne WilloughbyAre there any reports of anyone crawling through the silent patrol man OR is Lisa Banfield the only one🤷🏻‍♀

Snippy PinkyTARA SHOWED COURAGE THOUGH BY ATTENDING!!!
Snippy Pinkywhat about mrs. doubtfire?
 
Snippy PinkyNO SHE NEVER SAYS SHES SORRY NOTHING...
.
Snippy PinkySHE ACTUALLY SAYS ITS NOT THEIR FAULT AND SHES SORRY THEY FEEL THAT WAY
 
Snippy Pinkyhahaha
Snippy Pinkyyep work doxed
 
Snippy PinkyIn order to work the ABUSE NARRATIVE THEY MUST THROW RCMP UNDER THE BUS SEW THIS SHOULD GET INTERESTING!!!!
 
Snippy PinkyWhat is the reason given for SUING THE FAMILIES? SORRY to ask this deep in but... Can someone recall the reason for suing them? LIKE WHAT DID THEY DO?
 
Snippy Pinky@Becca A cause shes at the WAREHOUSE I BET YA!!! CLEANING HERSELF UP!
JJher lawyer did 11pm global news last night
 
Snippy PinkyCHANGING HER CLOTHES AND RIDING OF THEM, WASHING HERSELF UP EXCEPT WHATEVER LIL BLOOD SHE HAD AND FIXING HER HAIR AND FACE! before drop off at LEONS
 
 

 

Global National: July 15, 2022 | Wife of Nova Scotia mass shooter confesses to hiding information

56,060 views
Premiered Jul 15, 2022
 3.19M subscribers
On tonight's episode of Global National: The spouse of the gunman in the Nova Scotia mass shooting in 2020 spoke publicly for the first time in front of the Mass Casualty Commission. In an emotional, multi-hour testimony, Lisa Banfield confessed to hiding information from the police but stressed she did so because she was scared for her safety. Callum Smith has the latest. 
 
 Police in British Columbia are asking the public to help identify the shooters in the murder of Ripudiman Singh Malik. The 75-year-old was gunned down Thursday in a busy commercial complex in Surrey, B.C. As Aaron McArthur reports, the RCMP are confident this shooting was targeted but questions swirling about why Malik was gunned down. 
 
Plus, almost a year after Afghanistan fell to the Taliban, the Canadian special immigration program for Afghans is nearing capacity, but many who were instrumental in helping Canadian troops while in the country remain in hiding looking for a way out. Advocates and families with relatives still in the country are once again calling on Ottawa to do more. Abigail Bimman has the story. 
 
On the health front, Canada is reporting a 59 per cent increase in monkeypox cases, mirroring a global trend that has seen cases rise. As Jamie Mauracher reports, with this latest rise in cases there's a growing push for all Canadians to know the signs and be vigilant. 
 
Finally, U.S. President Joe Biden arrived in Saudi Arabia on Friday amid criticism after he vowed to make it a pariah state following the killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi. As Jackson Proskow explains, the visit comes as Biden faces a political crisis at home over gas prices. 
 
For more info, please go to https://globalnews.ca 
 
David Amos
O, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive!Walter Scott
 

Bro Lynn
Any stories on the police knowing he had a stash of illegal weapons? You know, because his next door neighbor—a military officer—told them two years prior? Or that they turned a blind eye because he was a CI in a biker gang smuggling case?
25
Yan Yu
looks like they found a scapegoat for the pigs total failure....
5
Rebell i Us Soul
The police only put work in after a crime is committed, they are never there to prevent a crime but only show up to take statements after the fact, that is something a computer can do. These clowns serve society how?
Pete Davidson
On one hand if Lisa did go to the RCMP sure they’d bust him for guns and he’d probably get out on bail and kill her. There wasn’t at the time, any way to put her in protective custody he wasn’t important to the RCMP other than being a bully of a reputation, which is amazing that there were no MEN man enough to slap him around or more, it’s like they wimped out. Lisa was caught between saving her own life and what she thought was a couple of cops and others. Little do she know the level of violence that was easily started only stopped with a slug in his brain. Between the comical bungling of where the shooter was, what vehicle he was driving and the timeline you’d swear the cops were in on it for training exercises....or funniest a scavenger hunt...it reads of a Monty Python sketch. The comfort some victims can take is in the end was he knew he was caught that he was being shot to death....
3
Klaus Schwab’s hubris.
Let’s correct the New Brunswick story , RCMP failure is the truth of that situation.
24
Olmr Gosh
The first stories were depressing to watch but in the end of global national went to very good news stories
2
Brian Ward
What a bunch of fluff ! What about the Millions of Dutch farmers protesting for their lively hoods and rights to put food on the table ! Their are things going on they don’t want people to know and what is coming people keep your eyes open 😳
14
Stewart D
I’m not Dutch.Sounds like a Dutch Global Story?
Wink Dinkerson
Seemingly there were numerous opportunities to thwart this killers shooting spree, before it began - yet all were ignored and overlooked.
6
MonsterT84
Remember our" trustworthy law enforcement" is here to protect us!!!
Jessica Pountney
Everyone knew he had a police car , I knew of it , it’s was parked behind his dental office in Dartmouth a lot of the time . This is a bunch of fluff and lies and everyone deserves real answers
13
SunshinEE
Did you report it?
Jessica Pountney
 @SunshinEE  it sat on a busy street , at his practise I thought it was an actual police car , I drive by it often thought it was a weird spot for them to always be parked . I didn’t have to report it , the cops knew
3
Cones
 @SunshinEE  report to who the rcmp who was in on it?
2
Jessica Pountney
 @SunshinEE  it was there for years lol they knew
Everything batman collector
If everyone knew why didn't everyone report it?
YZZ
 @Everything batman collector  why didn’t the police do something? Why does it have to be reported when it’s parked on a busy street right in front of their eyes.
1
V T
Someone should have asked her how she’s enjoying the payout of $475,000 he received from the RCMP prior to that event. This is all theatre
2
W. S.
That common-law spouse is putting on an act
15
Carlos R
you are an expert right?!
1
1
lima mackenzie
Along with the sisters. I don't think I have seen sadder faces. It's been two years. You would think these three woman actually lost something they loved that night. If they lost anything (especially LB) it would be the one thing that made her life pure hell (according to her). I will say it again. All my sympathy goes to the families. As for LB I just can't muster up any sympathy for this woman. Actually after seeing LB and her pathetic looking sisters all I can say is show a little respect to the families. Stop playing the victim card and give the families what they want. Answers. Bawling and crying doesn't work for them or anyone else. Two years and you"re still a mess. I guess guilt is a powerful thing. It can destroy you to the core. As for the sisters you played your part well. Be thankful you still get to hug your loved ones. Be thankful knowing what you knew about this man and knowing what he could be capable of doing your whole family survived this carnage. Amazing isn't it...Not one family member of his or LB's were murdered or harmed in this rampage. In all the years she spent with him not one member of her family was ever harmed by this man. Miraculous, coincidence who knows. What i do know is nothing this woman said has changed my opinion of her or what happened that night. Actually what I do know is after seeing the sad trio it has made me even more suspicious.
1
Carlos R
 @Darius Smith  otherwise it would be boring for all of us eh
1
Point Fire
The gentleman who hid in the woods for four hours was on the verge of hypothermia. Lisa claims to have pulled an all nighter, without shoes or thermal clothing, yet didn't need medical attention?
1
Rebell i Us Soul
Yup! She can save those crocodile tears, ain't nobody out here feeling sorry for her.
Carlos R
 @Rebell i Us Soul  you do not need to feel sorry just do not accuse people of something horrible with no evidence and just based on hearsay and crazy-based conspiracies
Louis Meloche
"I never thought he'd hurt anyone" but it sounds like he threatened her many times.
12
BlackCoffee
Educate yourself about domestic violence.
1
Louis Meloche
 @BlackCoffee  I bet you believe that col. Russell Williams wife had no idea what he was up to either ?
2
Blank Space Provided
 @BlackCoffee  Domestic violence victims believe that their abuser will hurt them. Claiming that she didn’t believe he would hurt anyone is inconsistent with that. Either she was being untruthful in her claims of abuse against her (not likely) OR she is lying now to minimize her failure to warn others about the threat he posed. Educate yourself about basic critical thinking.
Ieosus Lives
Rise Canada . Stand for you and your children's future .
33
Marc A
Rise? What do you mean by rise? You want us to do what exactly?You preaching for some violence?
3
Δ
 @Marc A  your projection is your confession
8
Ken Kanada
 @Marc A  settle down buddy. Maybe you have a few things to work out in therapy.
10
Just Working for the weekend
Cheese Ray Cheese Ray Cheese Ray
Kelly Tourigny
Canada is the best country on earth..thanks though.
4
3
Ieosus Lives
 @Marc A  can i quote your last comment ? "Someone needs to get rid of Putin immediately..."What do you mean by "get rid" of?You want us to do what exactly?You preaching for some violence? 🤔
3
Ieosus Lives
 @Marc A  Violence is for dullards and cowards. Violence is the language of your oppressors. We're better than them . Well, some of us .
Jamie Hume
Rise up for what exactly and in what way? Canada ranks #1 globally for quality of life. It ranks up a lot higher than the USA for most democratic and most stable democracy in the world. I vote. I write letters. I do social media. I get heard. I believe in democracy. We have a democracy so what the heck are you rattling on about?
1
Cosmic Comet Inner Chi Chi
 @Marc A  wow god forbid someone tries to tell ppl they have rights being violated!
2
1
Ieosus Lives
 @Jamie Hume  Get that from Just in TV ? Canada doesn't even make the top 20 . But nice lie.
2
Ieosus Lives
 @Jamie Hume Top 12 countries to live in based on jobs , price if goods , housing , and quality of life ; 1Denmark2Norway3Switzerland4Sweden5Finland6Netherlands7NewZealand8Germany9Luxembourg10Iceland11United Kingdom12Ireland
1
1
Clarkem
 @Marc A  rise up! And strike down the non believiers!
Bless Telemaque
 @Ieosus Lives   Imagine being in a country that is failing every single day
1
Ditzygypsy Jay
 @Kelly Tourigny  yes we are so lucky. So tired of the whiners.
1
Art Vandelay
We scored the top spot in "Quality of Life" and "Social Purpose," too. It looks like our country gained some serious bragging rights this year according to the 2021 "Best Countries in the World" U.S. News report, where Canada ranked number one overall.
Adrian H. Dragan
Interesting new development. My theory for the security,prosperity and insuring of liberty for the ''' Collective Of Global Civilization'' best at this Point In Time. Good News is that Eye Love You. Calling for an immediate ceasefire ! That stated, read the following thrice carefully and and please only discerning, wise and questioning persons respond : Back in October 2019, as a World Peace Advocate, Independent Student Scholar of History, Geopolitics, Wars & Civilizations and Independent Security Analyst and Theorist HAD concluded that we ( North America, NATO member countries and THE WEST) are on a path towards WW3 due to the US-CHINA TRADE WAR begun by the Trump Administration back in early 2018, The Arrest of the CFO of Huawei Meng Whenzou by the RCMP in Canada in order to honor an extradition treaty with the USA, other geopolitical events, & the historical event known as Pearl Harbor. Concluding as an Independent Thinker, Analyst and Philosopher that we ( Humanity ) are on a Path Towards WW3 HAD created, designed & made a New Training Program produced to go hand in hand with a WW3 scenario. Thus, October 17 2019 HAD performed the 1st session of the General War Integrated Total Body Training System aka The 300 Workout integrated & in parallel to a near future timeline witch was the WW3 scenario. 93 Days later, the COVID 19 Crisis Began ! In parallel to my WW3 scenario witch is caused by a Stock Market Crash witch consequently triggers a Global Financial Collapse the Coronavirus began. Not sure what caused Covid believe it was snakes but cannot rule out another possibility. What do know is my scenario HAD a solution the creation of a New Institution : The International Citizen Integrated Social Security Force aka The Dragon Army witch am calling for the creation. Tell the Leaders of the Free World Dragon Zero's Message : Drop Down and give Dragon 13 pushups with Love & For The Sake of World Peace. What say ye ? Will you join the Dancing Goddess & Dragon Kingdom for World Peace ? Can u support, volunteer, bless & love Adrian Hannah Dragon's World Peace Work ?
Art Vandelay
 @Adrian H. Dragan  Stop getting high from your own supply.
Ieosus Lives
 @Art Vandelay  absolutely not true . Judging by your comments , you are a paid whiner.
Ieosus Lives
 @Art Vandelay  you sound more legitimate when you're posting your vaccine rants . I see your channel has a severe lean towards the left . I'll wager that your pay cheque does too .
1
Adrian H. Dragan
 @Art Vandelay  Not me. Mostly high on coffee, sunlight and from a hyperactive child's energy. You ? u a drug fiend ?
1
Art Vandelay
 @Ieosus Lives   That's hilarious coming from someone who is suggesting Canada needs to rise up.
Ieosus Lives
 @Art Vandelay  Trump ? Seriously? Ha ha ha . And I'm supposed to take you seriously? Oh my .
Ieosus Lives
 @Art Vandelay  Yes i know Art , when you're skimming the bottom , rising up seems like such an impossibility, but you can do it little fella.
Ieosus Lives
 @Art Vandelay  what were you saying about Ad Hominem? You're the King , or Queen rather.
JJ
Who edits these segments? 😂“was reluctant to engage with Crown Prince MBS” 18:07😂Remember when Joe called him and he wouldn’t take his call? Who’s reluctant against whom? 😂 FYI, neither the King or Crown Prince received Joe at the airport whereas they were both there to welcome Trump
4
Bill Serjeantson
She said she was worried for her safety because on several occasions he threatened her with a handgun but then she says that she did not believe he would hurt anyone. Her entire testimony seemed to be series of contradictions.
8
BlackCoffee
Educate yourself about the psychology of domestic violence.
2
YZZ
You can be threatened by a domestic partner and simultaneously not expect them to go on a murderous rampage
3
Pete Davidson
Exactly, mental, psychological, physical not in any order. But what’s amazing is the two sisters sat idle by, did nothing kept it all to themselves. It’s like this guy had an entire province scared of him which I find really strange as I grew up in Cape Breton and some of the Bar fighters were and still are BIG and yet somehow this dentist didn’t cross their paths, that’s the deal with small town bullies they know who they can push around and who to stay clear of, seen it all too often but eventually they get what’s coming. My 2 cents worth.
Blank Space Provided
What is the point of an inquiry if you can’t inquire as to the truth of the evidence in the inquiry?
1
Ken Kanada
I wonder if the RCMP had any involvement with the murders? The guy had an RCMP vehicle. He had RCMP clothing. He was giving $450,000 from a Brinks truck. No one stopped this guy from killing all those people in 13 hours. What exactly were the RCMP doing in that time?
12
Jamie Hume
NO. Just no.
1
Pamela B
Running in circles - about 3 hours behind him. They missed several opportunities to stop him!!
3
Harbinger343
Shooting at each other, at the local fire department, not warning the public. You know, competent responsible law enforcement stuff…
4
Sage Lucien Corvus
 @Jamie Hume  why no? Why shouldn’t we try to cover all bases and be curious. That’s what keeps things interesting. And sometimes the craziest things turn out to be true. Also, freedom of speech soooo YES, JUST YES
4
Part of the fringe minority
Looks like he was associated with RCMP, agent perhaps.
3
BlackCoffee
Helping Trudie lay the foundation for his gun bill.
4
Art Vandelay
 @Ken Kanada  And that is the problem as per your opening comment.
The Middleman
So nothing related to Canada's current nightmare eh, if only the journalists could get a confession or even a simple yes or no out of the liberals. I'll litterally give you my entire weeks salary if you succeed.
12
curtis herbert
This lady could have stopped the NS mass shooting she is just as guilty as him for not speaking up she needs to be charged.
6
Carlos R
just sickening how we see those families trying to blame this lady....she is a victim just survived victim
6
curtis herbert
She's just as guilty for not speaking up
3
Carlos R
 @curtis herbert  easy for you to say when you were not there and just hide behind the internet...
1
curtis herbert
 @Carlos R  she helped him commit the crimes stop making excuses for her.
2
curtis herbert
 @Carlos R  all she had to do was go to police and get into protective custody.
2
Back Again
 @curtis herbert  Just like that? A woman was killed by her ex and she applied for a protection order but didn’t get it. Go back to your Xbox. Your attitude is what’s wrong in this world.
1
curtis herbert
 @Back Again  lol i don't play Xbox unlike yourself I believe everyone is responsible for their actions and this lady is lying she helped him get ammo and stayed with him for many years she's just as guilty as him.
Carlos R
 @curtis herbert  oh how did she help? I am sure everybody else on earth would like to know how did you arrive at that
curtis herbert
 @Carlos R  clearly you haven't watched the video or you know that she didn't come forward to police knowing he had weapons and would use them on others and she bought ammo for him.I don't believe her for sec that she had no idea what he would do.And you and others making excuses for her only makes her look more guilty as people like yourself are pushing an agenda that law abiding citizens should not have firearms for self protection or for fun of it.
Carlos R
 @curtis herbert  you would need to prove that she knew the ammo was going to use for killing people, not the other way around Einstein...it does not matter what you 'not believe for a second' ...it is about what you can prove or not.....explain to me how on this earth she could proof that the ammon she got would not be used to kill people...it is impossible right...and that is what you asking her to do....but it is YOU who need to prove she knew not the other way around
curtis herbert
 @Carlos R  no I don't have to prove anything giving somone ammo is illegal lol
1
curtis herbert
 @Carlos R  also not reporting somome who has illegal firearms is also illegal.
curtis herbert
 @Carlos R  its called aiding and a abetting.
Carlos R
 @curtis herbert  Oh you gotta report half of rural Nova Scotia my friend...and also it does not mean she is responsible for the killing in any shape or form
curtis herbert
 @Carlos R  she responsible because she didn't report him and helped him.Just because others commit crimes doesn't mean you can its still illegal and you would be charged.
Blank Space Provided
It’s sickening that we live in a society where you can’t ask any reasonable questions without being called an apologist for DV, but the people who could have reported it and kept it from happening to anyone else are not.
Cones
 @Carlos R  half of rural N.S has illegal firearms?
YZZ
 @Blank Space Provided  the police knew he had a cruiser and firearms and didn’t do anything. What do you say to that?
Keri C
 @curtis herbert  i think you need to consider her deress it seems she acted in psychological/physical defense as she reportedly dealt with on goong abuses. Police knew about him on many fronts and they did nothing prior, they are the ones who need accountability.
curtis herbert
 @Keri C  I also don't believe her she was with him for many years I'm sure their was many times she could have left him she traveled to usa and got him ammo and if the first cops didn't help her you go to another.
Everything batman collector
 @curtis herbert  u can't just walk in to a court and get protective custody tho
Everything batman collector
 @Carlos R  welllllll, as its canada and this guy didn't own these firearms legally her buying ammunition for him is illegal us legal firearm owners CANNOT go buy ammo for people without a license.
1
Everything batman collector
 @curtis herbert  100, this guy clearly isnt a pal holder
curtis herbert
 @Everything batman collector  you can walk into a police station and say you fear for your life then explain the person has illegal firearms and has said they will kill you.You can also leave said person when he,she goes to work.She was with him for many Yeats there's no excuse it's not like she was chained to the wall and could not leave
Everything batman collector
 @curtis herbert  ur describing restraining order, protective custody is something way different
curtis herbert
 @Everything batman collector  I'm not perfect I may have said the wroug thing.However she could have left him bit choose to stay with him for what ever reason and helped him.
Keri C
 @curtis herbert  i agree with this aspect it was disgusting.
Keri C
 @curtis herbert  i dont think you understand the impacts.of continual abuse on a person
curtis herbert
 @Keri C  she had many opportunities to leave, she spent over 10 years with him
lima mackenzie
Wow so many are being fooled by this woman!!! And her family!!!
1
lima mackenzie
 @Carlos R  What did she do? She hid in the woods knowing he was shooting people because he was looking for her. That's what I call a gutless human being. Did it never cross her mind that she could have traded her life for theirs. Twenty-two including a pregnant woman died at the hands of this man. She could have stopped the killings at anytime. She valued her life more then the innocent people he killed because of her. She chose to stay with this man. Her family knew he allegedly beat her and was abusive to her physically and mentally. But they chose to let their sister live in that abusive home. LB said he would kill her family if she ever left. Well I guess they are all selfish because they all stood back and protected themselves for years. Until the lunatic snapped. Then it was too late. But what the hell they get to hug their loved ones everyday. But the innocent people are the ones that paid the price for their selfish choices. Then they go to the MCC and act like they are victims. All three of them. It's great that she was able to muster up the strength physically and mentally to get her face and hair done for the cameras. I bet the victims families still have a hard time crawling out of bed and trying to handle one day at a time. It's one thing for a woman to put up with the abuse. But when she knows the abuser is capable, has threatened others it is her responsibility to take action. So many others in his family and her family knew what this man was capable of. So many stood by and watched this man be violent to others. They should all feel guilt. I really don't care to hear about LB's sad life. I don't feel sorry for her or anyone in his family or her family. They are all disgusting and deserve to feel guilt for the rest of their life.
1
Carlos R
 @lima mackenzie  from the privileging point of looking back, we can always play jesus to judge others.....it is very easy to say 'she should have this or that'...but when you see someone with a gun looking for, only survival instincts come in....i think none of us here in this comment section know what is like
1
Keri C
 @curtis herbert  again you.dont understand...think stalkhome syndrome....im not someone who falls for a victim mantality and i understand you dont know me at all, but there is way more to her psychological abuses that impact in ways your not aware and create these scenarios where woman are in abusive relationships sometimes to the point of their murder or death....there is a power dynamic beyond even the physical and or sexual where there imprisoned in plain sight. She may be in need of hospitalization and care for the rest of her life. The police are way more culpable in this. As far as her not reporting or buying amo fine charge her with that and take away her PAL. my understanding is Police were there many times and did nothing to protect her, she did not trust the cops so what was she to do? Even if she had not hidden in the woods the guy was clearly on a mission and unhinged perhaps spurred on by police and definately used by government. There is error upon error in this entire scenario and I do believe much foul play is at hand beyond the murderer im just not sure she was in on it but rather another victim.
FunnyHorseFlys
Put her in jail
9
jj jj
Not surprising. There are plenty of examples of of people coming up with excuses for their partners' deranged behaviour, whether it is murder or abuse of minors. The lengths people will go to be selfish to keep a partner. But even that doesn't make sense because for certain individuals based on a certain determination, as was the case here for her, her, there are unlimited fish in the sea, so why do they deliberately ignore all the other fish in the sea and willingly and deliberately choose to pick a deranged individual as their partner and then justify that partner treating themselves and other members of society badly?
1
YZZ
Because he knew everything about her, she lived with him, and was likely dependant on him too like all victims of abuse. Why are we not figuring out why the police did nothing when they knew he had a fake cruiser and many illegal guns? They’re scapegoating her and you’re faking for it hook line and sinker.
mcrick
She is getting away with her part
7
Charles U Fahrley
Dude really got his nose in there to catch those ol pox 😆
4
E-Curb
13:27Fixed it for you, Global News:"Confirmed cases of Monkeypox have largely been detected in GAY men."
Wayne McLean
Failures on so many levels.
3
Dave Gill
"neetu garcha" pronunciation in every video is amazing. Good for viewers. At least Global allows comments as opposed to CBC cowards.
E-Curb
Do you see this comment, CBC??? When you don't allow comments, it proves you are out of touch with the people.
David Amos
True but FYI Not all comments remain in public view
Rhonda Wentzell
I smell book deal.I’m disgusted.
2
mynameisray
She should be sent to prison for having this knowledge and not going to the police.
Aivah Bird
They for sure fled the country
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Impatient Blaine Higgs drops health minister, Horizon CEO

$
0
0

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/higgs-health-minister-1.6522029

 

Impatient Blaine Higgs drops health minister, Horizon CEO

Bruce Fitch becomes health minister, Dorothy Shephard moves to Social Development

Death in N.B ER waiting room highlights health-care crisis, premier says

1 day ago
Duration 1:49
New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs fired the province’s health minister and the CEO of a major health network after a man died in an ER waiting room, which he says highlights a wider health-care crisis in Canada.

 Premier Blaine Higgs dropped his health minister Friday and fired the CEO of one of two New Brunswick health networks after worsening news on the health-care front that included a "traumatizing" death in an emergency department's waiting room.

Bruce Fitch is now health minister, switching places with Dorothy Shephard, who moves from Health to Social Development, Higgs announced, during a Friday afternoon news conference.

Higgs also announced Horizon Health Network CEO John Dornan was fired from his role, and replaced on an interim basis by Margaret Melanson, the network's vice-president clinical services.

In addition, Higgs said he revoked the boards of both Horizon and Vitalité health networks and installed in their place a trustee for each.

WATCH | 'It starts at the top:' Higgs details changes to health-care leadership

Higgs says he was ‘appalled’ to hear of death in ER waiting room

1 day ago
Duration 3:33
The premier announced Friday he was firing the CEO of Horizon and replacing his health minister.

"We have a plan," Higgs said. "It needs to be implemented. The situation we're in today is the result of many, many years of successive governments refusing to deal with urgent situations."

The shakeup of New Brunswick's health-care leadership comes after a patient died in the waiting room of the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital's emergency department early Tuesday morning while waiting for care.

Witness John Staples said the man, a senior, had been waiting alone in a wheelchair, in visible discomfort for hours when he appeared to fall asleep. It was only during a routine check of people in the waiting room that a hospital employee realized the man had stopped breathing, he said.

Investigation ordered into death

Higgs said he was "appalled" when he heard a patient died while waiting to be seen in an emergency department.

He said he's asked Horizon Health Network to undertake an investigation into what happened, and that if he's not satisfied with the results, will ask for an external review.

Premier Blaine Higgs said the death of a patient in a Fredericton waiting room this week was traumatizing for the ER, the family and people who witnessed it. (Pat Richard/CBC)

"I have no doubt that every New Brunswicker is saddened and concerned by this story. We all want to know that if we go to the hospital we will receive help we need."

Answering questions from reporters, Higgs said his hope is the investigation uncovers whether any standards for care at the hospital were not being met when the patient died in the waiting room.

However, he was quick to note he doesn't believe fault lies with frontline health-care workers.

"I don't believe this has anything to do with — and I'm just stating an opinion here — anything to do with the nurses on shift or the people on shift.

"I believe it's a management issue. I believe there's no co-ordination of activity and that's what I'm trying to drive home here. If we don't get better management results in our hospitals, we won't get better health care."

Switching ministers

Higgs praised Shephard's work during the pandemic, and for her role in putting forward a new health-care plan for the province.

However, he said, Fitch would take a "fresh look" at how the department measures performance and where the shortcomings lie in health care.

Dorothy Shephard was shuffled from being minister of health to minister of social development, while Bruce Fitch was moved from social development to the role of health minister. (CBC)

"In the case of Bruce joining, sometimes a change is, some may say, better than a rest," Higgs said.

"Bruce is a seasoned individual within the government … he'll work with people anywhere, as Dorothy was, but bringing in a fresh look at, OK, how do we measure performance? How do we deliver on results? Where have we not provided and followed through on commitments made and what were the root causes of that?"

Revoking health authority boards

In place of the boards of directors for the two health authorities, Higgs said his government has appointed trustees Suzanne Johnston and Gerald Richard for Horizon and Vitalité, respectively.

"We are fortunate to have two outstanding and experienced individuals to come out of retirement to help guide us through these challenging times.

The boards of the health networks include members elected by the public and members appointed by government.

Higgs said the two boards were revoked to make quicker changes at the two health authorities.

"We're taking a crisis management approach here to allow decisions to be made, to allow direct consultation with appropriate people and get on with it.

"So we're removing this situation of a bureaucratic stalemate … and this isn't intended to be permanent but this is intended to get results. And right now I need to see results, and I want to remove the barriers and roadblocks for our health professionals to achieve them."

Higgs said he didn't have a timeline for when he expects results from the two trustees and was vague on what their targets were.

"There's going to be some targets we'll be setting out there that we want to achieve first. So I can't put a timeline on it but I do want to be clear on what the outcomes need to be."

'Major step backwards,' says ousted Horizon chair

Higgs's announcement was met with swift criticism from Jeff McAloon, the Horizon board chair until Friday. 

"I am disappointed and disheartened by Premier Higgs's unilateral decision to remove Dr. John Dornan as CEO of Horizon Health Network," McAloon said in an email statement.

"I believe in Dr. Dornan's experience and ability to affect real and positive change in the provincial health system."

During the news conference, Higgs sidestepped a question about what it was Dornan failed to do in his role as CEO.

"I think what I'm demonstrating here is a need to get a groundswell in relation to frontline workers in the case of Margaret Melanson and her role in clinical services and you know, how we can direct that in the hospitals," he said.

"I think in every hospital there needs to be a manager of clinical services that is really that gatekeeper of who is coming in? Who is going out? What's the time in? How quickly are we managing that? And we need to get on the ground with that.

   Dr. John Dornan was fired as CEO of Horizon Health Network after being officially named to the position only four months ago. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

McAloon characterized Higgs's move as a centralization of health-care control.

"To me, and to the partially elected, local board I led, today's announcement is a major step backward," he said. 

"It represents the loss of community ownership and engagement and clinical, leadership expertise.

"Centralizing control within the Premier's Office is not the answer. Politics is what got us here and is not the solution."

McAloon said he had not heard from Higgs and only learned of his decision moments before the news conference began.

"I join with all New Brunswickers in their feelings of shock and want nothing more than to see our system stabilized."

Johanne Lise Landry, spokesperson for Vitalité Health Network, said in an email that the health network did not receive any correspondence about its board being revoked.

There was also reaction from the medical community itself.

"Firing Dr. John Dornan would have to rank as one of the ill-advised, mindless and ill-considered decisions I have ever heard," tweeted cardiologist Dr. Robert Teskey. 

Opposition reaction

Interim Liberal Leader Roger Melanson wondered why it's taking so long for Higgs to do something about problems in the health–care system.

He said the premier has been in office for four years, and he needs to explain to New Brunswickers what his new plan is and why he thinks it will work.

But Melanson is concerned that attracting new doctors won't be high on the agenda for the province.

"We need health-care workers to be able to deliver these services, and they still have not even mentioned that today in this press conference," said Melanson.

Green Party health critic Megan Mitton said successive governments of Liberal and PC stripes have contributed to the state of the province's health-care system.

She's concerned about the abandonment of partially elected health boards, a move she said goes against democracy.

"We should not be seeing more centralization of our health-care system," said Mitton. "We should be going in the other direction and having more decision-making and power and resources at the local level."

Melanson said he would like to see the legislature recalled to deal with this issue, something Mitton said she would support.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Aidan Cox

Web reporter/editor

Aidan Cox is a web writer for the CBC based in Fredericton. He can be reached at aidan.cox@cbc.ca and followed on Twitter @Aidan4jrn.

-With files from Karissa Donkin, Shift and Jordan Gill

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/patient-died-waiting-room-emergency-department-chalmers-hospital-fredericton-horizon-john-staples-1.6519416 

 

Horizon review underway after patient dies in Fredericton ER waiting room

Witness John Staples says the health-care system is 'broken,' Liberals call for health minister's resignation

John Staples says the experience was a "stark and sombre realization" that New Brunswick's health-care system is "so sadly broken."

"It was a surreal moment because, I mean, I think I realized that they had just passed away in an ER waiting room," he said. "You're at a place where you're supposed to get care and you wind up passing away while you're waiting for that care."

"You're basically at the front door of health care … You're on the threshold of getting the care you need and you don't get it in time."

Staples, a residential support worker at an Oromocto community residence, says he went to the emergency room with a client who needed emergency care around midnight Monday.

He noticed the patient in question, who was several feet in front of them.

"It was very evident that they were in a lot of discomfort, just the way that they were behaving," he said.

"There was moaning and groaning and just the grimace on the face. I mean, it's just, you know, natural signs of discomfort when somebody is ill."

Appeared to fall asleep

After at least an hour of waiting, Staples moved his client from sitting along the wall to sitting beside the patient, respecting COVID distancing, so the client could watch the television on the wall.

Staples and his client watched a couple of half-hour TV shows and the patient appeared to fall asleep, he said.

                                      John Staples says he doesn't know the man whose death he witnessed in the ER, but that 'doesn't change the importance and the severity of the situation.' (Submitted by John Staples)

A hospital employee came out to check on people in the ER, which was fairly full, Staples said.

"And when they checked this one individual, very professionally rushed back [into the ER], so as not to cause any alarm, I assume."

Staples looked at the patient and noticed no rise and fall of the man's chest to indicate he was breathing. "And I thought, 'This person is gone.'"

That's when the hospital employee reappeared with three people and they wheeled the patient into the ER, he said.

"And as they were wheeling that person back, they called the 'code blue,'" which typically signals cardiac or respiratory arrest.

But they were too late.

"So that individual actually sat there in the waiting room and passed away."

No details released

Dr. John Dornan, president and CEO of the Horizon Health Network, confirmed that "an unexpected patient death took place" in the emergency department waiting room of the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital on Tuesday,.

No details about the patient or the circumstances surrounding the death have been released.

"Horizon thoroughly reviews any unexpected deaths that occur in our facilities to determine what took place and whether further action is required," Dornan said in an emailed statement. "As it relates to this incident, we immediately started the review process.

"We would like to extend our deepest sympathies to this individual's family and loved ones."

'We all have somebody that it could have been'

Staples was so moved by the experience he posted about it on social media Tuesday night.

"I think bringing this to people's attention, I mean, it's not new information, the wait times and the strain on our health-care system. But the fact that somebody passed away while waiting in a waiting room is — if there's ever a straw that breaks the camel's back, I think this is definitely a good opportunity for change to come about because we can't have people dying in our waiting rooms."

The Facebook post appears to have struck a chord. By Wednesday afternoon, it had been shared more than 3,000 times and had received nearly 200 comments. Staples isn't surprised.

"Well, I know for me personally, I have elderly parents. My dad has health issues. It could have been my dad being there. Right? And we all have somebody that it could have been.

"I mean, the fact that I didn't know the name of the individual who passed away doesn't change the importance and the severity of the situation.

"They're somebody's loved one. … They're still somebody who deserves the dignity and respect of being seen by a health-care professional."

Staples couldn't say whether the patient was triaged properly but said he doesn't blame the ER staff who were working that busy overnight shift. He has great empathy for them, he said.

They had to field a lot of questions and complaints from patients, he said, including one man who rang the bell after waiting four hours and left without being treated, as did a few others while Staples was there.

"The attendant was very empathetic with [the man who complained], but [said], 'You know, we've had people that have been here for eight hours. We're doing everything that we can,' which I believe they were.

"But it's just, what do we do with these wait times? Like, where do we get the doctors to come in so that we don't have people dying in waiting rooms?"

Minister reacts

Health Minister Dorothy Shephard said she was "deeply saddened and concerned" to learn of the patient's death and offered sympathy to the individual's family and friends.

She has requested a review of "the incident" from Horizon "for a complete understanding," she said in an emailed statement.

"We know the health care system is facing challenges and that frontline staff are working hard," Shephard said. "I have no doubt that every New Brunswicker and all of our health care workers are affected by this story. We all want to know that when we go for help it will be there, and that it can be provided.

"I anticipate receiving more information from Horizon officials in the coming days as the review progresses and the Department of Health offers our support to help in any way we can."

Save system 'before it's too late'

The Official Opposition is calling for the minister's resignation.

Jean-Claude D'Amours, the health critic for the Liberals, issued a statement late Tuesday afternoon about the patient's "very tragic passing" and offering condolences to family and friends "involved in this sad situation."

Citizens are pleading for help and all we hear from this government are platitudes and excuses for missed deadlines.
- Jean-Claude D'Amours, Liberal health critic

"Unfortunately, given the incompetence of the Higgs government and in particular the minister of health in addressing the dire crisis in health care in this province, this terrible outcome was a very real possibility," D'Amours said.

The Liberals have repeatedly demanded to see Shephard's plan to recruit "desperately needed health care professionals," he said.

"And ours is not a unique voice: professional health care associations like the Medical Society and the Nurses  Association have demanded action, citizens are pleading for help and all we hear from this government are platitudes and excuses for missed deadlines."

D'Amours called on the province to immediately free up enough of its "huge surpluses" to address hospital staffing issues.

Finance Minister Ernie Steeves initially budgeted a $244 million deficit for this year, but massive federal pandemic spending and a roaring economy turned it into a projected $487.8 million surplus.

But last month, Premier Blaine Higgs said it's too early to say if the province will be able to run a budget surplus as projected. The province is facing $100 million in higher costs because of inflation, and N.B. Power could take a similar hit, he said.

The premier "needs to stop whining to the federal government, demand that his minister of health resign and get on with saving our health care system before it's too late," said D'Amours.

With files from Hadeel Ibrahim

 

 

 

Wortman’s Outlaw Biker Ties

$
0
0

 

https://www.saltwire.com/nova-scotia/news/those-who-knew-gabriel-wortman-stunned-by-news-of-shooting-spree-439461/ 

 

Those who knew Gabriel Wortman stunned by news of shooting spree

Editor’s note — Some readers have expressed opposi ...To continue reading, subscribe to saltwire.com  

 

 

 

 

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-nova-scotia-mass-shooter-began-preparing-for-attack-over-a-year-in/ 

 

The gunman behind the mass shooting in Nova Scotia was assembling the pieces for the fake police cruiser used in his rampage more than a year before the deadly attack, newly released court documents say.

A heavily redacted RCMP application for a search warrant reveals how Gabriel Wortman used an online PayPal account to purchase equipment for the mock RCMP vehicle he drove in the April 18-19 killings that left 22 people dead in the province. An RCMP officer subsequently killed him at a gas station in Enfield.

The court documents were released Monday through a continuing legal effort from The Globe and Mail and other media outlets.

The documents also include more warnings from witnesses – and the gunman himself – about his paranoid behaviour in the early days of the global pandemic, as the 51-year-old denturist began stockpiling ammunition and significant amounts of cash.

In one e-mail obtained by the RCMP that was sent in March, about a month before the worst mass shooting in Canadian history, Mr. Wortman said he was preparing for the worst because COVID-19 would make people desperate “once the money runs out." He’d personally withdrawn $475,000 from the bank in preparation for what he thought would be the collapse of the financial system, one witness told police.

“Thank God we are well-armed," Mr. Wortman wrote. The grim comment is contained in the court documents that offer revealing insights into the gunman’s activities and behaviour. According to the RCMP, Mr. Wortman’s March 19 e-mail “talked about how the virus was huge and people have not dealt with something as big as it was.”

The court records also show that the gunman crossed the New Brunswick-Maine border multiple times in April and May of 2019, apparently to pick up police gear such as a siren, light bar and battering ram, which he had purchased online and had delivered to a U.S. postal box. He used companies such as Amazon, Kijiji and eBay to make his cruiser look as real as possible.

There’s also more evidence that warning signs surrounded Mr. Wortman long before his attack. The documents include statements from an unnamed friend of Aaron Tuck, one of the gunman’s neighbours and first victims. After the shootings, the friend told police that Mr. Tuck described violent altercations involving Mr. Wortman when he was drinking, and said he “would terrorize people.”

The man also described seeing a look-alike police vehicle in the man’s garage in 2019. Mr. Wortman told the man he was fixing up the fake cruiser to be used in “parades,” according to the document.

The RCMP have released few details about the firearms Mr. Wortman used during his 13-hour rampage, which started in the village of Portapique, N.S., on the night of April 18.

Story continues below advertisement

Having killed 13 people in the village, most of them friends and neighbours, he fled the area disguised as a Mountie and driving a vehicle that looked exactly like an RCMP cruiser.

The Mounties earlier confirmed that the killer had two semi-automatic handguns and two semi-automatic rifles, but they declined to release further details owing to their continuing investigation.

Gun-control advocates have said details about the firearms are important to the discussion about the federal government’s recent move to ban 1,500 types of military-style assault weapons.

However, the Mounties have confirmed that the gunman had a fifth firearm, which he took from RCMP Constable Heidi Stevenson after he rammed his vehicle into her cruiser and then fatally shot her in an exchange of gunfire.

The RCMP warrant application includes fleeting references to the acquisition of weapons, but the redactions make it impossible to decipher how he obtained the four other weapons.

The documents say Mr. Wortman did not have any firearms registered on the Restricted Weapons Registration System, the Canadian Firearms Information System or something called the Cognos client application system.

The court records also contain references to e-mails between the gunman and Peter Griffon, the man who helped the killer create the decals for the mock RCMP cruiser.

Excerpts from e-mails found on Mr. Griffon’s cellphone indicate that on the morning of April 18, the day the killing started, Mr. Wortman told Mr. Griffon that he was going to go for a drive with his partner, whose name is redacted, to celebrate their anniversary. He also refers to unspecified work the two men would do the following day.

On July 26 and July 31, 2019, Mr. Griffon sent photos to Mr. Wortman showing a white car with RCMP decals on it. Previously released information confirms that the vehicle Mr. Wortman used to evade police on April 18-19 was purchased on July 3, 2019.

Mr. Griffon, who was on parole from prison at the time, later provided a statement to police describing how he had made the decals for Mr. Wortman’s vehicle. Previously convicted of possession of cocaine for the purpose of trafficking in 2017, Mr. Griffon’s parole was revoked when the National Parole Board found out about his work with Mr. Wortman.

With a report from The Canadian Press

Follow Greg Mercer on Twitter: @GregMercerGlobe

 

 

 

 

 

https://thetarnishedbadgecom.godaddysites.com/f/and-then-we-got-duped-by-paul-palango 

 

And Then We Got Duped By Paul Palango

July 12, 2022
 
 
Rob Doucette aka Rob the Carpenter Rob Doucette aka Rob the Carpenter
 

  

FRANK MAGAZINE JULY 12, 2022

…. And then we got duped.

 

By Paul Palango

 

A 34-second snippet of audio tape showed that Gabriel Wortman was considered to be a person of interest in the still-unsolved murder of a Dartmouth man in 2004, according to a long-time friend of the mass killer’s.

 

 It looked like the perfect story.

 

The dead man’s name was Kevin James Petrie. He was 50 years old when he was bludgeoned on March 17, 2004. He died 11 days later. He lived in the same Dartmouth neighbourhood where Wortman had his denturist office and once owned a house. He was a thief and sold things to Wortman. He was into motorbikes, just like Wortman. He used to be a bumboy for local Hells Angels boss Randy Mersereau before Mersereau was whacked back in 1999.

 

There was that seductive, irresistible audio tape from 2004 in which two 'RCMPdetectives' questioned Wortman as a person of interest and told him that Kevin was dead. They didn’t actually utter the name Kevin, but Robert Doucette, Wortman’s carpenter friend, said he turned on his trusty tape recorder at the first mention of Kevin and caught some of the conversation. He assured us he was there and the conversation was exactly as recorded. It went like this:

 

'Wortman': “Ohhhh god.”

 

'Mountie': “You don’t seem too surprised to hear that. Why is that?”

 

'Wortman': “I had a vision that it was so.”

 

'Mountie': “So when was the last time you saw him, I mean, other than your dream?”

 

(At this point there is a six to seven second delay as 'Wortman' considers his response and then he does what might be described as an almost disembodied mantra. He goes on for about six seconds in a sing-songy fashion.)

 

Four of us were in the room listening to this and bought the story, but in retrospect there were clues that should have set off alarm bells.

 

Doucette started playing the tape to us before we had even settled into the room and after he played it, we all but ignored it moving onto other aspects that we wanted to explore.

 

Doucette said he had given the tape to RCMP investigators but they had done nothing with it.

 

We took a copy of the tape and afterwards we listened to it carefully. It seemed so real, even if the quality of the recording seemed more professional than something captured on a hidden, old-school tape recorder concealed in a pocket.

 

The timing also fit with something I had written in my recently published book, 22 Murders:

 

In the summer of 2003, Wortman threatened to shoot a neighbour, John Hudson, if he stepped onto the Portland Street property to help (Lisa) Banfield with her luggage. Later, the incident would be described as an example of Gabriel’s extreme jealousy. But his cartoonish defence of his possessions and property was starting to look like something more prosaic than jealousy. He was acting like a prototypical criminal who was leery of and unnerved by other criminals – or the police – getting too close to his stash. He mounted surveillance cameras around his business in Dartmouth and his properties in Portapique.

 

We were in a bit of a quandary. It was the kind of story you couldn’t just go out and have verified. We already know that the RCMP has been playing games galore on this file, so we couldn’t go to them. After all, we had published documents showing that the RCMP was destroying documents in the case back in the summer of 2020. That’s verified.

 

The other reality was that trying to dig into this story was like maneuvering through a den of snakes. Hardly anyone will co-operate on the record be they family, friends, neighbours, politicians or police. Everyone is afraid of everyone else.

 

The decision was made to throw it into the public forum and perhaps spark some interest in the Petrie murder, for which the Province of Nova Scotiahad put up a $150,000 reward for information leading to an arrest. It would also raise the issue of whether Wortman was a suspect in other unsolved murders.

 

Yeah, we were doing a public service.

 

Frank Magazineran the story. It put the tape on its website and we all lit up a congratulatory, if not metaphorical cigar, and quietly enjoyed our scoop, such as it was.

 

On Sunday night, July 10, Jordan Bonaparte and I did our regular Nighttime Podcast segment and talked about the story.

 

Monday morning, I was awakened early by every telecommunications device in my home dinging and pinging.

 

Something was going on.

 

Yikes! Yikes! Yikes!

 

An enterprising listener to the Nighttime Podcast was bothered by the tape. To him, it all sounded so scripted, like something he had heard before. After he got up that morning, he entered the phrases into his search engine and came up with a perfect match. It was from an episode of the ninth season of the television series CSI.

 

There was no doubt about it, but what to do?

 

I tried calling and texting Doucette, but he wasn’t picking up. I knew that he had a court appearance in Dartmouth at 1:30 p.m. for a trial on domestic assault charges which were ultimately withdrawn.

Frank editor Andrew Douglas and I made it our mission to meet there.

 

I got there early. I couldn’t help but notice that directly across the street from the Provincial Court facilities was the house at 269 Pleasant Street where Petrie had been beaten in a suspected home invasion.

 

As I turned the corner to the front door, there was Doucette standing alone.

 

“Hey, brother,” he said, seemingly oblivious to the havoc he had caused.

 

“What the hell did you do?” I asked.

 

He genuinely seemed flummoxed.

 

I played the audio of the CSI scene for him and said: “You said you taped this. It’s from a CSI episode.”

 

“It sounds similar,” Doucette said.

 

“It’s not similar,” I said. “It’s exactly the same.”

 

Doucette said he couldn’t explain what had happened. He said that he had played the tape for RCMP officers during his first interviews with them on April 19 and 23, 2020.

 

He said the Mounties took both his cell phone and the recorder and didn’t return them to him for 10 days. In an earlier interview with him, he did say that he thought things were missing from his telephone when he got it back. He had never mentioned the tape recorder until that moment.

 

“I thought the original tape was longer, but I hadn’t listened to it for years. It was in my drawer,” Doucette said.

 

“Are you suggesting that the RCMP deleted the original tape and replaced it with a conversation from CSI?”

 

“I don’t know,” he said.

 

“So, the question remains,” I asked: “Did two RCMP detectives really come to Wortman’s denturist office when you were there and ask him about Kevin Petrie?”

 

“They did,” he said. “I was there when it happened. I can’t explain what happened on the recorder.”

 

Neither can we, but the fact remains that we should have done better. (Regrets, we have a few… - ed.)

 

In regards to questions about what this episode does to Robert Doucette’s credibility on other matters involving Gabriel Wortman, well, it doesn’t help, certainly. But considering how long this man was friends with the killer, and how much of his information has been corroborated elsewhere, I would argue this unfortunate episode doesn’t completely hinder his credibility either. We’ll let you be the ultimate arbiter. 

-- 

Andrew Douglas
Frank Magazine
phone: (902) 420-1668
fax: (902) 423-0281
cell: (902) 221-0386
andrew@frankmagazine.ca
www.frankmagazine.ca

 

https://thetarnishedbadgecom.godaddysites.com/f/gabriel-wortman-and-the-2004-cold-case-murder-of-kevin-petrie 

 

Gabriel Wortman and the 2004 cold case murder of Kevin Petrie

July 7, 2022
 

Rob Doucette aka Rob the Carpenter

 

FRANK MAGAZINE JULY 7, 2022

THIRD OF THREE

 

Gabriel Wortman and the 2004 cold case murder of Kevin James Petrie 

by Paul Palango

 

A 34-second snippet of audio tape shows that Gabriel Wortman was considered to be a person of interest in the still-unsolved murder of a Dartmouth man in 2004, according to a longtime friend of the mass killer’s. 

 

Court records show that at the time of his murder Kevin James Petrie was a 50-year-old career criminal who had been charged more than a dozen times with drug trafficking, various thefts and assaults between 1993 and 2000. Police believe Petrie had been assaulted during an apparent home invasion at 269 Pleasant Street in Dartmouth. He died 11 days later after being found in medical distress at 7132 Spruce Street near the intersection of Joseph Howe Drive and Highway 102 in Halifax. 

 

An autopsy showed he had died from the effects of blunt force trauma to the head. In March 2019, the fifteenth anniversary of Petrie’s murder, the Nova Scotia Department of Justice offered a $150,000 reward to help solve the murder. 

 

Robert Doucette, who worked as Wortman’s carpenter and sidekick for almost 20 years says he was with Wortman at his denturist business at 193 Portland Street in Dartmouth when two plain clothes RCMP investigators walked through the door and introduced themselves. 

 

The Mounties were likely assigned to the Halifax Regional Police/RCMP Integrated Major Crime Unit. Doucette said the mood was casual and informal. 

 

They said they had come to ask Wortman about a person whom they described as “Kevin.” At the time Doucette said he knew of “a booster” named Kevin who did “business” with Wortman but didn’t know Kevin’s last name. “Kevin was just a little common thief … that used to hang around with us quite a bit. He used to pop in and sell stuff to Gabriel,” Doucette said in an interview with myself, Nighttime Podcast host Jordan Bonaparte and citizen investigators Chad Jones and Ryan Potter.

 

“The only time I ever seen Kevin was when I happened to be there and he would come and sell stolen stuff for 40 per cent of the cost. He sold meat for half the cost. I always wondered what happened to Kevin, myself.” 

 

At one point during their estimated 35-40-minute conversation with Wortman, the Mounties honed in on the big question all murder detectives ask: when did you last see the victim?

 

It was at this point Doucette reached into his pocket and activated the mini tape recorder he always carried with him. He captured only about 34 seconds of what was being said before he thinks he accidentally turned off the device hidden in his pocket. He captured an exchange between the detective and Wortman, just after the police mentioned Kevin’s name:

 

Mountie: “….he’s also dead.”

 

Wortman: “ohhhh god.”

 

Mountie: “You don’t seem too surprised to hear that. Why is that?”

 

Wortman: “I had a vision that it was so.”

 

Mountie: “So when was the last time you saw him, I mean, other than your dream?”

(At this point there is a six to seven second delay as Wortman considers his response and then Wortman does what might be described as an almost disembodied mantra. He goes on for about six seconds in a sing-songy fashion.)

 

Wortman: “Oh --godohgodohgodohgodohgodohgodohgodohgod”

 

There is brief laughter, and then a final indecipherable last comment - possibly “yes, but Stephen and I…” - after Wortman’s chant at which point Doucette believes he accidentally turned off the tape in his pocket.

 

Even to the untrained ear, Wortman appeared to zone out – dissemble – when asked about Petrie, like a child being caught stealing from the cookie jar.

 

After Wortman’s killing spree in April 2020, Doucette says he was interviewed up to seven times by Mountie investigators about what he knew about Wortman, whom he had known for almost 20 years. At one point Doucette said that he played the tape for RCMP but that the Mounties showed no interest in pursuing its possible importance. It doesn't appear anything about the tape has been released to the Mass Casualty Commission investigating Wortman’s deadly rampage which left 22 Nova Scotians dead. 

 

The revelation that Wortman was either a person of interest or a suspect in a previous murder flies in the face of previous denials from the RCMP that it had ever encountered him in a criminal case. It is also another example of the RCMP’s faulty institutional memory about Wortman, including allegations about domestic violence, possession of guns, having and driving a replica police car and his alleged threat to kill a police officer. 

 

Doucette, who was living near Shubenacadie at the time, does not know if the police conducted further interviews with Wortman.

 

It appears apparent, however, that the timing of the spring 2004 meeting coincided with Wortman’s move to beef up his security. I described what was going on in Wortman’s life around that time in my recent book, 22 Murders: Investigating the Massacres, Cover-up and Obstacles to Justice in Nova Scotia.

 

In the summer of 2003, Wortman threatened to shoot a neighbour, John Hudson, if he stepped onto the Portland Street property to help (Lisa) Banfield with her luggage. Later, the incident would be described as an example of Gabriel’s extreme jealousy. But his cartoonish defence of his possessions and property was starting to look like something more prosaic than jealousy. He was acting like a prototypical criminal who was leery of and unnerved by other criminals – or the police – getting too close to his stash. He mounted surveillance cameras around his business in Dartmouth and his properties in Portapique. 

 

That the Petrie murder investigators appeared to think of Wortman as a person of interest or suspect seems to provide additional context and support about Wortman’s inner world during that period.

 

For example, at this point Wortman was in the early stages of a personal relationship with Halifax Regional Police Constable Barry Warnell. Warnell, the longest serving active member of the force, has stated in interviews provided to the Mass Casualty Commisison that he was friends with Wortman due to their mutual interest in real estate. Warnell also purchased the house Wortman had lived in on Pine Street in Dartmouth after Wortman’s first marriage ended.

 

Doucette claims that Wortman told him that the deal with Warnell wasn’t as straightforward as it might have seemed. Doucette says that Wortman told him that he had returned money from the sale to Warnell for some reason.

 

Another interesting twist, Halifax police sources say, is that while Warnell was one of the highest paid officers on the force because of his penchant for pulling overtime, until 2007 he had been active in undercover roles. That raises the question of whether Warnell’s contact with Wortman had been personal, professional or a mix of both. Wortman’s common-law wife, Lisa Banfield, entered Wortman’s life around 2001 after the end of her first marriage to Michael Wagner. Throughout the early stages of the relationship there was much volatility. At one point Banfield’s father, Gilbert, offered to move her out of Wortman’s house. Over the years, she told various people that Wortman was difficult to live with and that she feared for her and her family’s life, if she left him. 

 

One potential line of questioning for her July 15 testimony before the Mass Casualty Commission: Did you know about the Petrie murder or investigation, and did that play a part in your almost leaving him in the spring of 2004? (While we're on the topic of potential questions for Lisa B: During an email exchange between Banfield and Wortman from May of 2019 released to the commission, she welcomes him to "the cult". What's that all about?)

 

Robert Doucette, meanwhile, sees his old friend Wortman in an even more sinister light. He spent a lot of time with him and heard and saw things that disturb him to this day.

 

“I really think he might have been a serial killer,” Doucette says. “He had barrels of lye and sulphuric acid underneath his deck. Him talking about the best way to get rid of bodies.” 

 

Doucette said Wortman never talked about killing anyone in particular, but more about how to get rid of a body – the theory of the perfect murder, as it were. He used to tell him that the foremost obstacle to getting rid of a body were teeth. 

 

“Teeth don’t burn,” he used to say. “All you gotta do is smash them.”

 

Fires were Wortman’s specialty, though, Doucette said. “Gabe was a fire bug. The bigger the fire the better.”

 

Wherever Wortman went, timely fires seemed to follow, providing insurance cash or, as in the case of a building next to his Dartmouth office in the early 2000s, a way to create a desired parking lot. 

 

“I didn’t think much of it at the time, but after all these murders were committed, I figured he might be part of the missing people. I think he was killing people, especially native women,” speculated Doucette. 

 

He cited a strange moment he observed during the six months he lived in a trailer at 136 Orchard Beach Drive in Portapique while building Wortman’s warehouse. It was the middle of the night – around 2 or 3 a.m. – when he was awakened and looked out a window. “He backed his truck down there 300 yards – maybe 500 yards,” Doucette recalled. “He was down there maybe 20 minutes or half an hour. He’d bring the truck back then get in his loader. He went back and moved the whole brush pile maybe 20 feet and then set it on fire.” It was curious behaviour and Doucette learned over the course of his precarious life not to get too curious when in the company of potentially dangerous people.

 

“Was Wortman a hitman?” Chad Jones asked.

 

“Hit men don’t get rid of their bodies,” Doucette replied. 

 

“Was he a cleaner?” Ryan Potter asked, wondering if Wortman, with his mortician pedigree, would be a likely person the bad guys might hire to dispose of a body.

 

“That’s possible, too,” Doucette said.

 

The answers to those questions are all unknown.

 

The important thing to note is that the Mass Casualty Commission appears to be all but allergic to finding those answers, dismissing anything about Wortman’s criminal activities as unimportant in the search for the truth. 

 

All that matters, it seems, is to make Lisa Banfield and any others who may know the real story feel comfortable. 

 

Now, these new revelations from Robert Doucette places an enormous elephant in the room which begs another obvious question: Was Gabriel Wortman a person of interest or suspect in other murders?

 

paulpalango@protonmail.com 

Paul Palango is author of the best selling book 22 Murders: Investigating the massacres, cover-up and obstacles to justice in Nova Scotia (Random House).


https://thetarnishedbadgecom.godaddysites.com/f/future-mass-killer-part-2-by-paul-palango 

 

When the Future mass killer shunned his friend Part 2

July 5, 2022

  

FRANK MAGAZINE JULY 5, 2022 2ND OF 3 STORIES

When the future mass killer shunned his friend Carpenter Rob for shooting his friend the bear

By Paul Palango

 

Meet Robert Arthur Mitchell Crowdog Taylor Doucette, otherwise known as Rob the Carpenter, Gabriel Wortman’s right-hand man for almost two decades.

 

He wears his greying hair tied back into a tight, single braid, and has been described as “scary” by some who have come across him. He admits that’s true – but says he’s not as scary as he looks.

 

He likes to wear a leather vest with patches on it, but the vest is a handed down family treasure that his great, great grandfather began wearing in 1897. Then there is a moose leather jacket that is 120 years old. 

 

“People think I am a biker when all I am is a fucking Indian,” he said at one point during a series of interviews. 

 

“I look like a pretty intimidating guy. I’ve looked this way since I was 16 years old. People see me coming and they cross the street but that’s not who I am. It’s just my protection. I’m totally the opposite. I go to work. I come home. I do crafts. I carve peace pipes. I do leather work.” 

 

Crowdog, as he likes to be called to acknowledge his proud Mi’kmaqheritage, was born and raised in the Yarmouth, N.S. area, spending much of his brutal childhood in the foster care system.

 

“I spent my first 14 years living in a wire dog cage,” he recalled. 

 

“By the time I was 10, I had spent more time in hospital than most people do in their entire lives. I didn’t learn to read as a child because I was always working. I finally taught myself to read when I was 26.”

 

He met his birth father when he was 15, who soon led him into the wider underbelly of the world, much of which Doucette refuses to discuss.

 

He even has policing in his blood.

 

He says his maternal grandfather was the notorious Verdun Mitchell, Halifax police chief in the ‘50s and ‘60s, who himself was a suspect in the still-unsolved 1955 murder of Halifax businessman Michael Leo Resk. Mitchell committed suicide in a washroom at Halifax police headquarters in 1968. Another relative was a police chief in Saskatchewan.

 

Doucette was working in 1999 or 2000 as a bouncer at the Ship Victory bar and restaurant in Dartmouth. He remembers the moment as if it were yesterday. It involved a member of the Rock Machine motorcycle club, the enemies of the Hells Angels in the Quebec biker war which was ongoing at the time.

 

“Somebody came in wearing a Rock Machine T-shirt,” Doucette recalled. 

 

“I told him to take it off. He wouldn’t take it off so I took him outside and took it off him. Gabriel praised me when I came back into the bar.”

 

“Are you a Hells Angel?” I asked.

 

“No, I am not a Hells Angel, but I do have acquaintances who are Hells Angels.”

 

In the ensuing years Doucette had a hand in building everything Wortman owned in Nova Scotia – his log cabin cottage and warehouse/man den in Portapiqueand his denturist office on Portland Street in Dartmouth.

 

They drank and partied together. Doucette was on the inside of just about everything in Wortman’s life until they had a falling out in the fall of 2018. 

 

After the massacres, a photograph circulated of Wortman feeding Tostitos out of the bag to a full grown wild black bear off the deck of his cottage at 200 Portapique Beach Road.

 

“It was going after somebody else’s dog … so I killed the bear,” Doucette said. 

 

But before that falling out, Doucette accrued a thousand stories about Wortman, enough knowledge to compel him to call 911 on the morning of April 19, 2020. He had heard on the news that the police had named Wortman as the man who was dressed as a Mountie and driving a replica Mountie cruiser while killing people – eventually 22 in all.

 

It was 10:12:15 a.m. when he called 911.

 

“I’m just wondering if you guys are aware of what weapons he has,” he said, all but discombobulating the 911 operator.

 

“Ahm, can you ah, why, how you, how would you know sir, how many weapons he has?” the operator nervously asked.

 

“I know he has an AR-15, he has a Barrett 50 caliber sniper rifle. I know he’s got a Glock 40 and he’s got an assault 12-gauge shotgun.”

 

“Do you know if these are all legally obtained?” the operator asked.

 

“No, they’re all brought across the border. He’s been smuggling out of Maine for probably the last 20 years,” Doucette said, adding a few seconds later: “He also has two cases of nail grenades.”

 

Doucette also told the operator that Wortman had a stockpile of official decals from the RCMP, Halifax Police, fire chiefs and postal vans.

 

“I was warning them to look out for the others,” Doucette said afterward. 

 

“(RCMP Constable) Heidi (Stevenson) was still alive when I called. I knew they were approaching (Wortman) with caution, but I was saying that they should be approaching with even more caution.”

Doucette said he called 911 because he was trying to save lives.

 

That’s not the image of him stored in police data banks.

 

On December 20th last year, Doucette was visiting a female friend who owned a vicious Serbian Rottweiler, a dog with a massive head and enormous biting power. Doucette said the dog attacked him and he had to fight it off. He still has puncture wounds on various parts of his anatomy. 

 

Halifax police showed up and the owner of the dog, fearing that the animal would be seized told the police that Doucette had attacked her and that the dog had intervened.

 

The police charged Doucette with assault. His trial is scheduled for July 11.

 

But nothing in that matter is as it seems.

 

We met the woman in question a few weeks ago. She drove Doucette to a book signing event at Chapters in Dartmouth. She looked presentable and once had an impressive job, but something was not right about her. We soon learned that she had serious psychiatric issues, but the police didn’t want to hear that, apparently. The disclosure documents provided to Doucette’s lawyer described him as being “a police hater” and “an associate of Gabriel Wortman” and “violent.”

 

“I may look like a violent guy, but I’m a peacemaker,” Doucette said. 

 

“They call me an associate of Wortman’s. I was trying to save lives and they (the police) make it look like I was fucking involved. They call me a police hater, but one of my best friends is a cop in Toronto.”

 

Also in Toronto, his older brother David Doucette tragically died in a suicide-by-cop incident outside a Spadina Road rooming house in 2015. 

 

Back in Nova Scotia, it appears to be a police strategy to minimize, discredit and even make disappear anything that Doucette has tried to offer up about Wortman and his life. In many ways it is similar to what happened to Portapique resident Leon Joudrey. 

 

Joudrey took in Wortman’s common-law wife Lisa Banfield at 6:34 a.m. on April 19. Joudrey, a woodsman, didn’t believe Banfield’s story about being in the woods for more than eight hours on a freezing night. The RCMP not only ignored him but eventually had Joudrey charged and locked up in a psychiatric facility.

 

Although he doesn’t hate the police, Doucette doesn’t trust them either. That’s one of the reasons that over the years he carried a mini recorder that he could switch on when times became interesting for him.

 

Over the years he enjoyed one of the clearest windows into Wortman’s wild world.

 

Through a woman he was dating in 2000, Doucette met denturist Gina Goulet. 

 

“My company name was the Horseman’s Hammer. I built every horse barn between Windsor and Truro.”

 

The Registry of Joint Stocks says the Horseman’s Hammer General Contracting, a sole proprietorship, operated out of Nine Mile River for several years beginning in 2004. 

 

Doucette said his girlfriend had him build fences for Goulet. 

 

“Gabriel went with me to do the estimate. I had the impression that (Wortman and Goulet) knew each other. They didn’t say that but I thought that.”

 

Goulet would become the 22nd and last of Wortman’s victims.

 

He said Wortman was on a never-ending hunt for sex. 

 

“Gabriel would chase everything from 18 to 80,” he said. 

 

“He was a pig that way. He would just go up to women and say: “I would like to fuck you.”

 

He described attending hot tub parties in the Portapique area, including those at Brenda Forbes’s house on Portapique Beach Road. 

 

“He’d just go with a bunch of booze, strip off and climb in the hot tub. Everybody else would just shoo …. and get out of the hot tub. Gabriel was built like a donkey. Wasn’t a whole lot of women who wanted that near them,” he said, indicating with a chop of his hand that Wortman’s penis hung halfway down to his knee. 

 

Doucette said that Lisa Banfield didn’t like him hanging around, but that he wasn’t all that fond of her either.

 

“To my mind she was the controlling one,” Doucette said, echoing comments made by others, as reported previously. 

 

“She didn’t like anyone hanging around that Gabe liked. One time Gabe, me and some guys were sitting around having a beer and Lisa marched in and said to Gabe: ‘You, come with me, right now.’ He jumped up and went with her.”

 

Doucette said that he witnessed moments of friction between the two but didn’t ever witness Wortman hitting or abusing Banfield. He did see him jack up her Mercedes, remove all the wheels and throw them into the river in one fit of pique.

 

Another time he heard Lisa say through a closed door: “Don’t you ever put a gun to my head, again.”

 

On the other hand, the day after one row between the couple, Doucette said that it was Wortman who was sporting a black eye.

 

From Doucette’s vantage point, Wortman was a complicated character, driven by money, sex and his love of his Portapique property. He wanted to own the entire area. The people he liked he liked a lot, almost to the point of taking ownership of them. He would give dentures away to people who needed them but if he thought a customer could afford to pay, Wortman wanted every last cent owing to him.

 

“One time we were in his office in Dartmouth, near where Lisa usually sat, and Gabe saw a customer go by who owed him $20 for a $3200 set of dentures,” Doucette remembered. 

 

“Gabe rushed out the door and took the teeth right out of the guy’s mouth.”

 

Yet Doucette described Wortman’s affection for an elderly couple who lived across the road from his cottage. In the last stages of the man’s life, the Victorian Order of Nurses would tend to him. Wortman would often be there overseeing what was going on. When the man died at age 93 or so, Wortman irrationally blamed the VON nurses for killing him.

 

Ironically, it seems, Wortman’s 18th and 19th victims were VON nurses Kristin Beaton and Heather O’Brien.

 

Everything about Wortman was confounding, Doucette says. He was addicted to criminal behaviour. His warehouse was filled with stolen goods. He was at one and the same time dodging the police and pretending to be them – or was he pretending?

 

“That’s a good question,” Doucette said. “I really wonder.”

 

tips@frankmagazine.ca

NEXT: Doucette’s tape recorder tells a riveting story


 

https://thetarnishedbadgecom.godaddysites.com/f/wortman%E2%80%99s-outlaw-biker-ties 

 

Wortman’s Outlaw Biker Ties

July 5, 2022
 

FRANK MAGAZINE JULY 5

On Wortman's outlaw biker ties, where he stashed his secret phone, and Lisa's history of ammo buys

 

Border officials knew mass killer smuggled guns, but was allowed to keep his NEXUS pass

By Paul Palango

 

A Halifax-area man who was close to Gabriel Wortman for almost 20 years says the RCMP failed to turn over full transcripts of his interviews in disclosures to the Mass Casualty Commission.

 

Robert Doucette told the police tales about, among other things, Wortman’s cell phone, his cache of grenades, a curious incident at the Canadian border and how he was there when Wortman’s common-law wife Lisa Banfieldfired off some rounds from a Glock 40 handgun and had been purchasing ammunition for Wortman for almost a decade.

 

Frank Magazine recently provided Doucette with copies of his statements released by the Mass Casualty Commission. After reviewing those documents, Doucette said that his statements appear to be strategically edited or sanitized to remove his recollection of some of the criminal and other potentially controversial behaviours by Wortman.

 

Until recently, Doucette, 56, had largely been known as the mysterious Rob The Carpenter, who helped Wortman build his cottage on Portapique Beach Road, his warehouse on Orchard Beach Drive and his denturist office on Portland Street in Dartmouth, among other things. 

 

Doucette has never been interviewed by the media. After a series of preliminary interviews, Doucette agreed to a three-hour filmed interview which was conducted at an undisclosed location on the afternoon of July 1 by myself, Nighttime Podcast host Jordan Bonaparte and citizen investigators Chad Jones and Ryan Potter.

 

In Doucette’s estimation, somewhere between a third and one half of what he told police in those interviews never made it onto the public record. He said he recently provided his lawyer with the interviews from the MCC website.

 

“I just gave her a copy as reading material. I didn’t tell her anything was missing… She told me there must be a lot missing because you get sentences and then there is a comment. There just seems that there’s something missed out."

 

Doucette said his interviews published by the MCC on its website are very misleading. 

 

“The statements appear to indicate that I spoke with them two or three times. In fact, investigators came to see me seven times. They came so often that I was kicked out of my apartment In Halifax by my landlord. He had some tax issues and the neighbour across the street was a cocaine dealer who complained to my landlord about all the police hanging around.”

 

The smuggling runs

 

Wortman had been smuggling cigarettes, drugs and guns across the border since his days at the University of New Brunswick in Fredericton from 1987 to 1991.

 

According to government documents released by the Mass Casualty Commission he had been targeted for investigation on numerous occasions beginning in at least 2008 and over the subsequent six years. Nevertheless, he was granted a NEXUS trusted traveler pass on April 1, 2015. Eight months later, Wortman was again targeted by customs officers. Afterward, he was not targeted again. The NEXUS pass was reevaluated in 2018, but not revoked by the CBSA. 

 

A heavily redacted CBSA internal communication on the MCC website — an email dated October 22, 2020 with the subject line ‘(Heads Up) Nova Scotia shooting’ — notes that ‘He was a NEXUS member’. In Wortman’s ‘client profile’ (contact information, DOB, etc), his NEXUS status is listed as ‘cancelled’. Although no date is given, one can assume it was a postmortem revocation of privileges. 

 

Doucette said he accompanied Wortman on two smuggling runs from Houlton, Maine to Woodstock, N.B.between 2016 and 2017. Doucette didn’t cross the border either time. Although the Nova Scotia-born and raised Doucette said he lived in the United States in the past, he had once smuggled into Canada a case of six M-16 rifles stolen from the U.S. military which placed him in jeopardy with U.S. authorities. 

 

Doucette said that in the first run he got out of Wortman’s vehicle on the Canadian side and had to wait “a day and a half to two days” for Wortman to return. He was vague about what he did killing time during that period. 

 

“I was just there. I can hang out anywhere,” he said. 

 

When they got back to Portapique, Wortman showed him the AR-15 assault rifle that he had smuggled. It was hidden in a false exhaust that Doucette said he had constructed under the truck. 

 

“The truck looked like it had dual exhausts but one of the exhausts wasn’t an exhaust. It looked like it went into the engine and came out the back of the truck. The middle looked like it was under a skid plate but that was just an empty compartment.”

 

On the second run to the border, Doucette said that Wortman returned in about two hours with another AR-15 and a 50-calibre Barrett sniper rifle, a weapon that currently retails for about $5,000. But something strange happened.

 

“He drove right past me and went somewhere else for an hour and a half. He then came back and picked me up,” Doucette said.

 

Wortman never explained the purpose of the side trip and Doucette was not about to ask him.

“That tells me that he had more in there and sold it somewhere,” Doucette said.

 

“If he was a (police) agent they’d have to photograph it all,” I said, repeating what I had been told by police sources familiar with such situations.

 

“I would imagine that,” Doucette said, adding that he didn’t know whether Wortman was working with the RCMP, but considering what had happened it was not beyond the realm of possibility.

 

In her statements to the RCMP, Banfield said that Wortman hid smuggled goods on the bed of his truck, under the tonneau cover.

 

“That doesn’t make any sense,” Doucette said dismissively.

 

It is not known what happened to Wortman’s black Ford 150 Platinum.

 

A call from the Canadian Border Services Agency

 

About six weeks after Wortman had smuggled the Barrett sniper rifle into Canada, Doucette said he received a call out of the blue from a CBSA agent, whose name he didn’t recall.

 

Doucette said he had no idea how the CBSA knew his name, phone number or details about Wortman’s smuggling run.

 

“He asked me about the two guns (the Barrett and AR-15),” Doucette said. “I have no idea how they knew about them.”

 

The conversation didn’t go far, Doucette said, but it raises questions about what law enforcement knew about Wortman’s activities during that time period. 

 

In the earliest days after the massacres, Nova Scotia RCMP commanding officers Chris Leather and Darren Campbell indicated that Wortman was never on their radar for his criminal activities – at least not in Nova Scotia. 

 

However, it should be noted that in 2016 the RCMP’s J Division in New Brunswick initiated three major operations focused on the Hells Angels and its expansion into the Maritimes. Projects Trident, Thunder and Thunderstruck were joint forces operations involving, among others, the Fredericton and Halifax police departments as well as Border Security. The primary targets of the multi-agency investigation were Hells Angels Nomads Robin Moulton and Emery “Pit” Martin who were arrested and charged in 2017 and 2018 respectively, and imprisoned.

 

Moulton resided near Woodstock, NB and when arrested was found to be carrying a 9mm Beretta handgun, a model that Wortman was known to have smuggled into Canada around that time.

Wortman’s cell phone

 

The RCMP and Lisa Banfield have insisted from the start that Wortman did not use a cell phone and that all calls to him were handled by Banfield. 

 

Robert Doucette says otherwise. 

 

He first brought up Wortman having a cell phone on April 19, 2020 at his first interview with police, which was conducted by Halifax Detective Constable Anthony McGrath. Doucette said the interview took place at RCMP headquarters at 80 Garland Avenue in Dartmouth.

 

In the 40-page transcript, Doucette is quoted as saying, “He can watch every one of his properties from his phone.”

 

Although the time of the interview isn’t given, it’s clear we are very early in the proceeding, as Doucette at least isn’t even aware that Wortman’s rampage had come to an end. So only a few hours, at most, had elapsed since Lisa Banfield (allegedly!-ed.) emerged from the woods in Portapique and told Const. Terry Brown that Wortman didn’t have a cell phone of his own.

 

Four days later on April 23, Constable Dayle Burris and Corporal Kathryn MacLeod conducted a follow up 31-minute interview with Doucette. 

 

“Rob, every little detail is important,” Burris said at one point. “Don’t leave anything out.”

But the meandering line of questioning didn’t include any attempt to find out more about the phone.

 

Meanwhile, in his interview with us, Doucette said that over the years Wortman was disciplined about his secret phone, the number to which he never gave out, even to Doucette.

 

“He hid it in the door panel of the truck. It was always in silent mode,” Doucette said. 

 

“Lisa didn’t even know about it. I saw it. It was an Android phone like a Samsung. He never called me on it, and I didn’t know the number to it.”

 

Others who have since gone on the record as saying Wortman didn’t have a phone — statements happily parroted by police — include neighbours Dana Geddes and Cyndi Starrett, among others. 

Doucette said Wortman used to monitor his home, business and warehouse security cameras on the cell phone.

 

The issue of whether Wortman had access to a cell phone has persisted since the massacres. At some points on Sunday April 19, it appears that someone was calling into the RCMP with information that was designed to throw off the Mounties.

 

For example, there was a call at around 10 a.m. about a dead woman in a car at the Hidden Hilltop Campground, just north of Masstown. It came just as the police thought they were closing in on Wortman on the Fisher family property just to the south of the campground. There has never been an explanation given for the dead woman in the car saga.

 

Likewise, if Wortman had a phone, a call from him about the police car parked at the Onslow-Belmont firehall might explain the strange behaviour of the two Mounties who shot at one of their own members and an EMO worker that morning.

 

The RCMP has denied that Wortman had a phone, but its statements must be weighed against the fact that the force was destroying evidence in the case in the months afterward until it was finally ordered to stop doing so in the fall of 2020.

 

Prior to the interviews with Doucette, two different police sources told Frank Magazine that they strongly believed that Wortman had a police-issued undercover cell phone.

Lisa Banfield – ammunition and guns

 

In December 2020 Lisa Banfield, her brother James and brother-in-law Brian Brewster were each charged with illegally supplying ammunition to Wortman, some of which he used in the 22 murders that were committed that weekend.

 

His finances exhausted by the legal battle, James Banfield eventually pleaded guilty to a charge. Earlier this year, as her case was set to go to trial, Banfield’s case was transferred to Restorative Justice, as was Brewster’s. This meant everything would be hidden away in a closed and odd process, considering the facts. Restorative justice means the two sides in a crime come together, talk things over and work out a resolution, as if it were a dispute that could ever be resolved. 

 

Doucette said he told the MCC investigators that Banfield had been purchasing ammunition for Wortman “since around 2010 or 2011. She wasn’t around Portapique all that much but when she did come up, I saw her bring ammunition. I don’t know if she had a PAL (Possession and Acquisition Licence). She got ammunition for everything except the Barrett. I don’t think it’s easy to get .50 calibres in Canada. I think Gabe brought a bunch of those in from the States.”

 

Doucette said he and Wortman used to shoot the guns, especially at the warehouse property with its long, cleared fields.

 

He said Wortman liked shooting the Barrett but wasn’t a very good shot at first. Doucette said that after he coached Wortman “he could take the top off a beer bottle from 500 yards or so.”

 

Doucette said he twice saw Banfield firing a Glock 40 pistol outside the cottage at 200 Portapique Beach Road. He said she was inexperienced at the time and that the gun was too much for it.

 

“She almost lost the gun over her head … and she handed it to me and shook her head,” Doucette said.

 

The grenades 

 

Lost in the shuffle over the past two years of stalling and deflections by the RCMP and the Mass Casualty Commission was the story of Wortman and the grenades.

 

Originally, the RCMP had blacked out mention of grenades in their Informations to Obtain a Search Warrant. Police sources told me the blacked-out word was grenades – possibly phosphorous grenades.

Eventually the word was unredacted in a mass release of information and lost in the deluge as stories considered sexier overwhelmed the news flow of the day.

 

But Wortman and the grenades are likely vital to the underlying story – Wortman and his relationships with biker gangs and his possible role as a Confidential Informant or police agent.

 

Of all the secret compartments that Doucette built for Wortman, one was in his warehouse at 136 Orchard Beach Drive under a work bench. That’s where he stored grenades.

 

Doucette said that Wortman had smuggled two cases of grenades across the border and that they came in a green U.S. military case with yellow lettering.

 

They were not phosphorus grenades.

 

“He showed them to me and asked me exactly how they worked,” Doucette recalled. 

 

“They were nail grenades. They were about as thick as a pen refill. Double headed. No ends – 3 ¼ inches long. Each one holds between 75 and 100 of these nails. All you do is twist these grenades, a quarter of a turn, and throw it. It will land in a room, bounce and then it will wobble. It will stand up straight up and down like an egg and when they go there is nothing in this room that wouldn’t be hit.” 

 

While anything to do with Wortman’s activities with criminals is constantly being downplayed by officialdom, the existence of the grenades may well be the key to what was really going on in Wortman’s world.

 

The police hunt for grenades featured largely in search warrants issued to Trident, Thunder and Thunderstruck investigators in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Quebec and Ontario, according to court records and sources.

 

In the underworld, shrapnel grenades are an exotic item most suited to the tastes of a select group outlaw motorcycle clubs, the only likely buyers. Wortman’s possession of the grenades raises obvious questions: Was he working with the bikers and supplying them with guns and grenades or was he working with the police to set those bikers up?

 

Doucette said he doesn’t know to whom Wortman was selling grenades, but conceded that it was at least his understanding that Wortman was selling guns and other paraphernalia to a number of Nova Scotia motorcycle club members over the years. These included the Darksiders and two Colchester County clubs – The Highlanders and the Mountain Men Rednecks. Police sources added that the Red Devils, a Hells Angels support club, were also likely Wortman customers.

 

A police source says that Wortman was a frequent visitor to the old Darksiders’ club house near his denturist clinic on Portland Street. 

 

“The door to the right was for members while the door to the left was for associates and friends of the club,” the policeman said. 

 

“I’ve been told that Wortman always went to the left.”

 

Doucette concurred, saying that Wortman was accepted by some of them as “a friend of the club” because he provided them with products they needed.

 

Law enforcement sources and others interviewed by Frank Magazine say each of the above assertions by Doucette raises serious and concerning unanswered questions about Wortman, police operations and the approach being taken by the Mass Casualty Commission investigating Wortman and the RCMP response.

 

Doucette, himself, is skeptical about the Mass Casualty Commission: “From what I can see, they are not trying to get to the truth.”

 

tips@frankmagazine.ca

NEXT: The man who shot Wortman’s pet wild bear.

 

 

 

 

https://40gallonsandamule.blogspot.com/2020/06/tracking-gabriel-wortman-mountie-ci.html 

 

Saturday, June 13, 2020

tracking the Gabriel Wortman, mountie CI claim though public online obits

the Hells Angel-Prison Guard angle - Paul droppin’ bad acid - or what ?
I don’t have any insider information —- Zip, None —— about Gabriel Wortman—- and probably you don’t either.

In fact, if you are like me, you feel more than ordinarily trapped behind a computer screen inside your home - thanks Covid !

How then do you get a sense that the media reports you hear have any truth to them ?

What I do first and foremost when reading a news story is to put the names I come across - particularly names that seem unusually rare - into a google search combined with the words “survived by” or “visit the grave of”. Searching for online obits.

Basically I am using the skills of genealogy 101 to do a little amateur detecting on a mass killer’s life.

Author and RCMP critic Paul Palango was on the Rick Howe radio show on June 11th, detailing his theories that the unstable and violent GW was given a lot of slack by the RCMP because he was a CI (informant) to the New Brunswick RCMP with regards to the Hells Angels and Mexican drug cartels etc.

Heavy stuff - is Paul just dropping bad acid and spinning this stuff out of his butt —- or what ?

He mentions an NS born Hells Angel called Peter Alan Griffon. I google that unusual name and “survived by” and get the obit of Tom Kavalak of Springhill NS.

Kavalak is survived by Joanne (Alan) Griffon of near by Portapique and Audrey McLeod of near by Truro. Audrey’s son is called Sean. Same name was one of GW victims. I google Sean McLeod and survived by Audrey Truro and a Chronicle Herald obit confirms the Portapique Hell’s Angel and the Hunter Road murdered prison guard are cousins.

About the same time, Paul is making that same point on the Rick Howe Show.

On this particular claim, a minute googling confirmed Paul was indeed ‘telling the truth’.

Now was that so very hard  - for me - or any ordinary citizen - to do ?

 

 

 
 
 

Friday, June 19, 2020

Wortman, CI - mounties move anti-biker operations to NB - suicide staff sergeant Bruce Reid


What connection - if any - between his tragic death & Wortman story ?
Was there a connection between the decision in late summer 2019 to centralize all Maritime mountie anti-biker operations to New Brunswick and the October 25th 2019 sudden suicide of veteran mountie, staff sergeant Bruce Reid ?

And did this central command process upset long time relationships local provincial RCMP had built up with informants inside and on fringes of local Hells Angels branches and farm teams ?

Such that the multi-province raids against Hells Angels & associates in February 2020 fuelled extrahuge amounts of biker paranoia over who had betrayed them this time ?

Did this paranoia spill over to lover-of-motorcycles, friends-with-Hells-Angels, RCMP CI, Gabriel Wortman in February and March 2020 ?

We recall, from FRANK MAGAZINE reporting, just how paranoid GW was about a couple of plain clothed HRM police poking around near his Portland street garage in mid February - a big RCMP anti biker operation was about to go down, starting a handful of days later.

As the raids continued into March, a jumpy GW withdrew $450,000 in large bills and started stockpiling gasoline.

Were things all going pear shaped for Gabe Wortman on the biker front ?

Did this coincide with covid worries? 

 (But GW claimed he was about to retire, so covid only affected the re-sale value of his clinic if he got out in April rather than wait til say July).

Did this coincide with his increasingly fragile health ?

 I see in his very last photos, a man who looked strikingly different from his life-long wiry self. Thirty years of hard drinking and not enough proper foods had really done a number on his health - his liver in particular.

A lot of questions ; so few answers.

Keep those tips coming in people - if not to me, than to other media sources you can trust to follow things up, not to just sit on them....
 
 michael.marshall55@gmail.com
 
 
 

 
 
 
 Page 417
 
 
 
 this page is not a offical RCMP our have affiliation with any Canadian police department it's a news story sharing source for the public and to support public interaction within Canada police departments to help with departmental issues
 
thetarnishedbadge@yahoo.com
 
 
 
Rick Howe and lawyer Robert Pineo interview discussing new tip line formed to gather witnesses and information in regards to the NS mass shooting
 
 
 
 
 
Rick Howe Paul palango October interview with regards to the public Inquiry into the NS shooting
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rick Howe show with Paul palango November NS shooting discussion
 
 
 
 

Search

Library Catalogue

Dispersing the fog : inside the secret world of Ottawa and the RCMP / Paul Palango.

Location

Public Safety Canada Library

Resource

Books & Reports

Alternate Title

Inside the secret world of Ottawa and the RCMP

Call Number

HV 8157 P35d 2008

Publishers

Description

544 p. ; 24 cm.

Summary

This book examines the recent history of the RCMP, arguing that Canadians should be concerned about its mandate, its performance, and its too-close relationship to government and politics. It gives an overview of the politically-charged investigations that have shaped the relationship between governments of Canada and the RCMP since the 1980s, such as the Income Trust scandal, Airbus, Project Sidewinder (a joint RCMP-CSIS investigation), the RCMP pensions and insurance scandal, and the Maher Arar case, concluding that the federal and provincial governments have re-shaped the RCMP over the past three decades for their own political purposes and that this influence has damaged both the RCMP as an organization, and undermined national security.

Contents

1. A typo: the key to a monumental intrigue. -- 2. Jean Chrétien and Giuliano Zaccardelli. -- 3. The emperor commissioner. -- 4. The invisible hand of Stephen Harper. -- 5. Maher Arar takes the stage. -- 6. The Mounties charge into the fog. -- 7. The crowing of an influential man. -- 8. My attempts to interview Maher Arar. -- 9. Arar reconsidered. -- 10. Behind the typo: CIM 2000 Inc. -- 11. Arar's travels. -- 12. The Canadian candidate and the scapegoat. -- 13. A convenient diversion. -- 14. The lost guardians. -- 15. The Arar gatekeepers take over the RCMP. -- 16. Shades of truth. -- 17. The secret armies of the RCMP. -- 18. The four horsemen of the apocalypse. -- 19. All the dead young saints. -- 20. Federal policing - the biggest scandal? -- 21. Airbus I - le cercle of disturbing benefactors. -- 22. Airbus II - lyin' Brian and his media "enemies". -- 23. Project sidewinder: the "power" behind the throne. -- 24. Canada's undermined national security. -- 25. The Australian model: constant evolution. -- 26. The lurking dangers of "integrated policing". -- 27. A not-so-invisible hand, after all.

Items

 #Call NumberStatusLocation
1HV 8157 P35d 2008On ShelfPS-Circ
 
 
 

Was Maher Arar linked to the FBI?

A journalist who has written three books on the RCMP says a typographical error in a federal commission of inquiry report led him to discover a great deal about Maher Arar’s past. Paul Palango, author of the new book Dispersing the Fog: Inside the Secret World of Ottawa and the RCMP (Key Porter Books, $32.95), told the Straight in a phone interview that he wonders if Arar, a Syrian-born Canadian engineer, has had a long-standing relationship with the FBI. Palango also said he thinks that the federal government made former RCMP commissioner Giuliano Zaccardelli a fall guy, possibly to cover this up.

Zaccardelli resigned in 2006 after revelations that the RCMP shared information about Arar with U.S. authorities, who detained him at an airport in New York. “They had to have a scapegoat to hammer home this Arar story,” Palango said. “And he was made a scapegoat.”

A commission headed by Ontario associate chief justice Dennis O’Connor had a mandate to report on the period between Arar’s detention in the United States on September 26, 2002, and Arar’s return to Canada in October 2003. O’Connor determined that Arar was shipped to Syria by the Americans and tortured, even though he posed no threat to national security. Prime Minister Stephen Harper later announced a $12.5-million settlement (including legal fees)  for Arar, who never testified under oath to anyone about his experiences.

Palango, a former national news editor at the Globe and Mail, said he had originally planned to write one chapter on Arar as an example of RCMP bungling. But it mushroomed into a much larger portion of the book as he learned more about the case. He noted that the O’Connor commission report provided very little information about Arar’s past.

“I didn’t know who he was,” Palango said. “If you asked the basic questions of journalists—who, what, where, when, why, and how—he’s like an invisible man.”

Palango discovered that the O’Connor commission report misspelled the name of a company that was listed as part of Arar’s employment history. In one place, it was identified as “CIM21000 Inc.”, and in another, it was written as “CIM2000”.

Palango later discovered that Arar had set up a company with a slightly different name, CIM 2000 Inc., which was registered between 1997 and 2000 in the name of his former sister-in-law, Parto Navidi. At the time, she and her ex-husband, Mourad Mazigh, were living in a house owned by an arms dealer named Pietro Rigolli. Rigolli was later jailed for violating a U.S. embargo on selling military hardware to Iran. Palango reports in his book that search warrants were executed on Navidi’s house and at a building at a Montreal airport, but that the affidavits to support the search warrants disappeared from a Montreal courthouse in 2000. In the book, Palango notes that it’s unclear whether Arar lived in the house with his brother-in-law and his brother-in-law’s then-wife.

Palango said that if in fact Arar was living there, “In light of the Rigolli investigation, which was conducted on both sides of the border in 1999 and 2000, Arar and his family would have been identified as being the tenants of Rigolli’s house. And all of those connections would have been made.”

In 1999, Arar went to Boston to work for a company called MathWorks, which Palango said was a contractor for the CIA and the U.S. defence department. Palango said that Arar appeared to have no difficulty obtaining work permits for the U.S., adding that it’s unlikely Arar was ever linked to terrorism.

“You can only infer from this that there is a special relationship between the U.S. government and Arar that had to be protected,” Palango maintained. “So what is that relationship? And why I lean towards the American angle is because of his access into the States. He can renew his work permits. He goes to work for MathWorks. You know, it seems all orchestrated to me.”

In a 2005 article citing unnamed CIA sources, the Washington Post reported that of 39 people who were sent to jails overseas through a process known as rendition, about 10 were later found to be innocent. Palango said that they all shared similar stories, which increased his suspicions about the true nature of the Arar case. As well, he claimed, all later got involved in left-wing politics. Arar’s wife, Monia Mazigh, the sister of Mourad Mazigh, ran for the federal NDP in the 2004 election. “So where does the FBI or CIA or U.S. intelligence want to be?” Palango said. “Where do they want information? It’s from the left wing.”

The Straight left a message for Arar through his publicist; Arar did not return the call by deadline.

Charlie Smith

Charlie Smith has been editor of the Georgia Straight since 2005. Before that, he was the paper's news editor.

 
 
 

HistoryGeneral

Dispersing the Fog

Inside the Secret World of Ottawa and the RCMP

by (author) Paul Palango

Publisher
Key Porter Books
Initial publish date
Oct 2008
Category
General

Description

Dispersing the Fog is an unprecedented and explosive report compiled from an investigation into the politics and justice system of Canada, focusing primarily on the relationship between governments of Canada since the 1980s and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.
Until recently, no institution in Canada has enjoyed such admiration and respect as the Mounties. They were beloved. They were trusted. They were respected.
From its humble beginnings in 1874, the Mounties have evolved into a hugely complex police force with almost 16,000 officers and nearly 10,000 civilians with an annual budget of $4 billion. There is no police service in the world like it, and for good reason. For more than 35 years the RCMP has found itself mired in a seemingly unending litany of organizational, legal and political controversies, the kinds of scandals that would have ruined a similar-sized corporation.
How did it all go so wrong?
In Dispersing the Fog, Paul Palango provides answers to questions that have long simmered in the consciousness of Canadians. Why was Ottawa so anxious to settle in the Maher Arar case? What were the roots of the Income Trust scandal that helped to get Stephen Harper elected Prime Minister of Canada? Was Brian Mulroney an innocent victim of biased journalists in the ongoing Airbus imbroglio? Why did governments cover up the truth in Project Sidewinder, a joint RCMP-CSIS investigation?
Palango builds on the powerful and influential arguments made in his first two RCMP books, Above the Law and The Last Guardians, to show Canadians why they should be concerned about the RCMP, its mandate, its performance and its relationship to governments and politics.
No other author knows the subject matter better than Palango. Dispersing the Fog is not just a book about the RCMP, but a story about the political and justice systems in general and a wake-up call for any Canadian concerned about the security and integrity of the country.
Dispersing the Fog is an elegant, thorough and conclusive debunking of the many myths of the RCMP and the Canadian way of policing. It shows clearly how the federal and provincial governments have encouraged and nurtured the RCMP over the past three decades for their own political purposes. It takes the reader on a step-by-step, virtually invisible process whereby one prime minister after another toyed or parried with the RCMP in pursuit of his own respective agenda.
In our post-9/11 world, Dispersing the Fog addresses the role played by RCMP leaders, politicians and the media, who have all collectively failed to recognize and address the very real and articulate concerns of Canadians from coast to coast who have long questioned the ability or willingness of the RCMP to carry out its duties.
No one who cares about democracy and the health of the country's guardian institutions can afford to ignore this book.
CORRECTION
Dispersing the Fog written by Paul Palango and published by Key Porter in 2008 incorrectly identified Julie Van Dusen as the source of a question posed by a member of parliament at the ethics committee into the Mulroney-Schreiber affair. Ms. Van Dusen reported on the proceedings but was not the source of any questions.
Key Porter and Paul Palango apologise for this mistake.

About the author

PAUL PALANGO was born in Hamilton, Ontario and earned a degree in journalism from Carleton University. He has worked at the Hamilton Spectator (1974-1976), covered the Toronto Blue Jays in their first season for the Toronto Sun (1977), and worked at the Globe and Mail from 1977 to 1990 as City Editor and National Editor—where he was responsible for the supervision of investigative journalism done by Globe reporters across the country. In 1989, on behalf of the Globe and its staff, he was selected to accept the Michener Award from then Governor-General Jeanne Sauve. After leaving the Globe, he worked as a freelancer, writing a city column for eye weekly magazine in Toronto for almost five years. In 1993, he began work as a fraud investigator for a leading forensic accounting firm, which allowed him to see the justice system from a unique perspective. In that capacity, he traveled extensively around North America investigating fraud, including an arson investigation in Saskatchewan, in which he helped the Mounties there focus on the likely perpetrator, who eventually was convicted and went to prison. He has worked on investigations for the Fifth Estate—including a case involving links between Hamilton mobsters and then Deputy Prime Minister Sheila Copps—as well as investigative journalist pieces for Saturday Night, MacLean’s, Elm Street, Canadian Business and Hamilton Magazine, among others. His books include, Above The Law (McClelland & Stewart) and The Last Guardians (McClelland & Stewart 1998).

Paul Palango's profile page

Other titles by Paul Palango

22 Murders

Investigating the Massacres, Cover-up and Obstacles to Justice in Nova Scotia

by (author) Paul Palango

Publisher
Random House of Canada
Initial publish date
Apr 2022
Category
General, Organized Crime, Law Enforcement
 

Description

#1 NATIONAL BESTSELLER
 
A shocking exposé of the deadliest killing spree in Canadian history, and how police tragically failed its victims and survivors.

As news broke of a killer rampaging across the tiny community of Portapique, Nova Scotia, late on April 18, 2020, details were oddly hard to come by. Who was the killer? Why was he not apprehended? What were police doing? How many were dead? And why was the gunman still on the loose the next morning and killing again? The RCMP was largely silent then, and continued to obscure the actions of denturist Gabriel Wortman after an officer shot and killed him at a gas station during a chance encounter.
 
Though retired as an investigative journalist and author, Paul Palango spent much of his career reporting on Canada’s troubled national police force. Watching the RCMP stumble through the Portapique massacre, only a few hours from his Nova Scotia home, Palango knew the story behind the headlines was more complicated and damning than anyone was willing to admit. With the COVID-19 lockdown sealing off the Maritimes, no journalist in the province knew the RCMP better than Palango did. Within a month, he was back in print and on the radio, peeling away the layers of this murderous episode as only he could, and unearthing the collision of failure and malfeasance that cost a quiet community 22 innocent lives.


Editorial Reviews

#1 NATIONAL BESTSELLER
PRAISE FOR PAUL PALANGO:
“Why isn’t the Nova Scotia mass shooting a national scandal? It may well turn out to be if Paul Palango has anything to say about it.” NOW (Toronto)

 
 
 

Dispersing the Fog: Inside the Secret World of Ottawa and the RCMP

by Paul Palango

Paul Palango has a lot of material to work with in his new book about the ineptitude, incompetence, and, in some cases, outright corruption of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. Having drifted far from the public image of probity that the Mounties have cultivated – and, Palango contends, have come to rely on to maintain their popular support – the force is in need of major changes.

Dispersing the Fog: Inside the Secret World of Ottawa and the RCMP covers everything from the RCMP's mishandling of the Air India investigation – due in part to the force’s ongoing rivalry with CSIS – to its role in the Maher Arar affair. Along the way, Palango points out more pedestrian examples of backwardness, such as the force’s outmoded training system and the shockingly long list of recent casualties. After all of this, the RCMP comes off worse than the Baltimore Police Department of David Simon’s TV series The Wire.
 
The RCMP’s investigations of former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney’s relationship with Karlheinz Schreiber offer all sorts of material for Palango, but he goes off in an improbable direction, discussing  shadowy groups Le Cercle, the Bilderberg Group, and the Trilateral Commission. He even throws in brief mentions of Opus Dei and the Bavarian Illuminati.

This is the stuff of poorly researched conspiracy theory websites. While there may be something reassuring and even entertaining in invoking nefarious organizations to help explain away some of the political events of the last quarter-century, it is ultimately unconvincing. Palango is on much firmer footing in his second chapter on the Mulroney-Schreiber affair, which focuses on the efforts of reporters to uncover details in the face of institutional roadblocks.

Aside from the drift into conspiracy theory, Dispersing the Fog is a useful catalogue of the many flaws and shortcomings of the RCMP, complete with interesting suggestions for improving their situation.

 
 
 
 
 

Paul Palango: Democracy and accountability are an illusion


By Paul Palango, straight.com
December 04, 2008

�Aren�t you afraid?�

That is a question I�ve been asked hundreds of times over the past two years as I researched, wrote, and published my latest book, Dispersing the Fog: Inside the Secret World of Ottawa and the RCMP.

The question has been asked of me by curious politicians, bureaucrats, police officers, a judge and an ex-judge, my friends and acquaintances, and members of my own family.

The very fact that it is asked suggests that Canadians are not entirely comfortable in their own country. We think we live in a safe, open society, but at the same time so many Canadians seem to believe that it is dangerous to ask questions or raise issues that might strike at the heart of something darker going on within the country.

Am I afraid?

No and yes.

In my career as a journalist and author, I�ve seen how power is wielded in the shadows.

In the early 1980s, as a reporter at the Globe and Mail, I undertook an investigation into the Urban Transportation Development Corp., an Ontario Crown corporation. The UTDC, as it was known, was the baby of then-premier William Davis, who had received international recognition for promoting the company�s linear-induction train technology. I found that the technology was extremely expensive and would not likely sell in a competitive market without enormous government subsidies.

The UTDC never sold another train after that article.

Back then, Davis took aim at me both personally and professionally. He called me a traitor to Ontario and complained privately to the publisher of the Globe and Mail about my �biased� reporting.

A few weeks later, while I was stopped at a traffic light on University Avenue in Toronto, a reporter for the Toronto Star pulled up beside me, rolled down his window, and said: �I hear you�re going to sports.�

And so it happened. Three weeks later, I was a sports reporter, but the sidetracking did not deter me. A year later I was the sports editor, then city editor and, finally, national editor at the Globe and Mail.

Nevertheless, I continued fighting to the end, driven by the belief that journalism was a calling, not a profession.

Over the years, I witnessed the gradual transformation of newsrooms. New reporters had better and more elaborate pedigrees. I remember one time when then�Globe editor William Thorsell posted the biography of a new young reporter on the bulletin board as an example of what we should all aspire to be. The reporter, Mark Kingwell, had multiple degrees and was an accomplished pianist. As it turned out, he wasn�t much of a reporter, but he turned out to be a notable pop philosopher and author.

Pedigree and university degrees became more important than instinct in the news business. Newsrooms, once rowdy and noisy, became like insurance company offices: neat, tidy, and lifeless. It was no surprise, therefore, that the stories emanating from these newsrooms became just as predictable. News decisions were replaced by business decisions, and the news business still wonders why it is not so highly regarded by the public.

In the 1990s, I wrote two books about the RCMP: Above the Law and The Last Guardians. The first book was widely praised; the second was all but ignored by the mainstream media. I think the reason for this was that I had begun to focus on the unseemly political realities of Canada, for example, the politicization of the bureaucracy and the lack of checks and balances built into the system.

At one point in the mid-1990s, I began to investigate the Vancouver Stock Exchange and the influence and activities of members of the Church of Scientology. Nobody would publish the piece, mainly because Time magazine was facing a $500-million lawsuit after having written a slice of that story.

In 1996, I became involved in an investigation in Hamilton, Ontario, of a waste-management company. By just asking questions, I attracted an $11-million lawsuit and death threats

In that investigation, I was among the first�if not the first�to uncover and recognize large-scale accounting fraud. I mistakenly believed that government, police, the banks, and the accounting industry would rush to the rescue, but I had not come to appreciate how much the world had changed in such a short period of time. The mainstream media, fed to the point of satiation on news releases and marketing by governments, business, and themselves, did not want to hear the story. In fact, they were more interested in attacking me.

I was made out to be the enemy, even though the company in question had hired private investigators to conduct surveillance on me and my family. Attempts were made to steal our trash. Someone tried to poison our dogs. My family lived in fear, and our circumstances were severely reduced, but we wouldn�t give in. It took me a decade to fight that lawsuit off and win a favourable settlement.

The two books I had written during this period were not published because of the outstanding litigation. The roaring tigers of the media and publishing world had been reduced to cowering kittens and stenographers.

By the time I came to write Dispersing the Fog, I was battle-hardened. That doesn�t mean I was not fearful, but I was careful and cautious, particularly so when I stumbled into the underlying story of Maher Arar.

The official Arar story was that he was an innocent man who was betrayed by incompetent RCMP and CSIS officers and shipped by the Americans to Syria, where he was tortured for a year. The O�Connor Commission held hearings and the Harper government awarded Arar $10.5 million in compensation in February 2007, and another $2 million for legal fees. I had publicly bashed the RCMP for what it had done on numerous occasions on radio, on television, and in print.

However, as I researched the book, there was much about the Arar story that did not make sense to me, especially after I began to dig deeper into the official story. An apparent typo in the O�Connor Commission report eventually led me back into Arar�s past to a convicted arms dealer. The timing and the circumstances of the arrest of the arms dealer, as well as the fact that documents about the case went missing from a Montreal courthouse in 2000, were extremely suspicious.

As I pursued the Arar story in the fall of 2007, each step I took was measured and thought out in advance. I didn�t want to talk to too many people I did not know, because that could be dangerous. The entire Arar affair had been hidden under the veil of national security. Reporter Juliet O�Neill and the Ottawa Citizen had already been raided by the police after having written stories about Arar�s past, based on tips from anonymous sources. I felt I had to fly under the radar and get my story out before anyone realized what I was doing.

However, strange things did begin to happen. By October 2007, my sources were telling me that the government and the RCMP had issued strict orders that no one discuss the Arar case with me.

In November, my computer started acting weirdly. I found that it was heavily infected with viruses. I installed a new computer on a Wednesday afternoon. It had a Windows firewall and another firewall on its router. The next morning, my brand-new computer was barely functioning. A technician from my Internet provider, Eastlink, worked over the phone with me for more than an hour trying to determine what was wrong. Finally, a technician came to my house. He discovered that overnight someone had hacked into the system and deposited 1,105 copies of viruses and Trojan horses on my hard drive. Eastlink security said that whoever had attacked me had targeted me and was �extremely sophisticated. You should call the police.�

I did not do that. I just changed computers and used my laptop. The next week, my laptop wasn�t working. Someone had managed to get into the registry and flip off my product code.

�Whoever did this must have been in your house,� a security technician from Eastlink told me. �You should call the police.�

I was certain that no one had been in my house, but I asked Eastlink to record both situations in its logs.

I had one more attack similar to the others. I called Halifax police chief Frank Beazley and asked him for advice. He told me to complain to the RCMP about it, but I declined to do so. I knew how the RCMP might try to use something like that against me by suggesting that I was paranoid. I asked Beazley to note my call and concerns in his diary.

So I just soldiered on, changing computers and improving my defences but never going off-line and working on a computer unconnected to the Internet. Call it doublethink. I believed that if I had done so and tried to hide what I was doing, I might have invited an intrusion by whoever was interested in my work.

�Are we in danger?� my wife, Sharon, asked me.

�Maybe, I don�t know,� I told her. �But I may have to go to jail for a while on some trumped-up charge. Will you visit me?�

Things seemed to settle down after that, but when I told my editor, Jonathan Schmidt, at Key Porter Books what had happened, he was stunned. �Our computers have been down for days,� Schmidt said. �Our technicians can�t figure out what happened.�

Maybe there was a connection and maybe not. Maybe it was all just a coincidence, but I had to take whatever was happening seriously.

My phones and computers were always acting up. As I reported in the book, I was mysteriously blocked from some Web sites while probing possible connections to Arar. Nevertheless, I talked openly on the phones and through e-mails and made it clear that copies of my stories were regularly being sent to my publisher, agent, lawyers, and others, including two working journalists. I kept these people in the loop at all times because the dumbest thing for a vulnerable freelancer to do is try to protect an explosive story alone. Ask Danny Casolaro. He ended up dead in August 1991 in a West Virginia motel bathtub, and his file on the �Octopus�, as he called it, went missing forever.

I did not flinch in pursuing this story because I see myself as merely the agent of the story, and the story demanded that I go as far as I possibly could to tell it.

Should I be afraid for my life? It seems like such an unreasonable proposition to even consider, but that�s the way Canadians seem to think. Like a vast colony of J. Alfred Prufrocks, far too many of us are afraid of our shadows, of making a scene or getting peach juice on our clothing. We are caught up in our creature comforts, our ATVs, iPhones, and scripted reality television, willfully oblivious that everything we have can be taken away at a moment�s notice, because no one really seems to believe in anything but the easy life.

Dispersing the Fog is more than the story of Maher Arar; it is an investigation and analysis of the past 30 years of Canadian politics. It conclusively shows, based upon hard and irrefutable evidence, that we have lost control of our own country. There is an appearance of democracy, but real democracy and accountability are an illusion. There is no will at the highest levels to incorporate checks and balances in the system that would serve to protect us all. I guess that�s too dangerous an idea to be discussed openly.

I love Canada. I want Canada to be fair, progressive, and governed by the rule of law. It is a battle worth waging for everyone, even if it means in the short term being personally smeared by politicians, police, and members of the media who are all too cognizant of their own culpability.

That�s the only thing to fear in Canada. You don�t get killed for being on the cutting edge in Canada; you either are ignored or shunned, or get heaps of mud thrown at you. Over the past few weeks, I�ve experienced all three.

I was booked to do a number of shows on national television�CTV�s Canada AM, the CBC�s Sunday Morning�and the CBC radio syndicate, among others. Each cancelled at the last minute. Why? We can�t find out. My public-relations person, Pat Cairns, says she has never seen a media response like that. She�s astonished. It�s clear that not only my well-researched Arar story but everything else in the book�about the RCMP, Jean Chr�tien, Brian Mulroney, Stephen Harper, and the state of Canada�is making too many people nervous.

Although the media is aware of what I have written, no one, to my knowledge, has bothered to confirm or refute what I report. To do so would only open a can of worms that no one�the government, political parties, or, especially, the mainstream media�wants to touch.

Instead, the official Arar story is perpetuated ad nauseam as if I had written nothing. The CBC�s Anna Maria Tremonti was almost in tears in early November while interviewing Arar and his wife, Monia Mazigh, about her recently published memoirs.

An executive producer for The Hour said George Stroumboulopoulos wasn�t interested in my story, and a week later, on November 27, Stroumboulopoulos interviewed Arar and Mazigh again, promoting Mazigh�s book without ever popping a meaningful question about Arar�s mysterious past.

I have been tarred as a conspiracy theorist�the lowest of the low�which is the Canadian way of shooting the messenger. I�ve even heard reporters say that my Arar story is not credible because I do not have �official sources� confirming it, as if the government would admit to what it has done. Many of the facts I dug out were unknown to the original RCMP investigators in the Arar case, hidden from them by their own force. The great irony is that the Canadian media got sucked into the Arar story because it relied religiously only on official sources who manipulated it into a box. The facts speak for themselves�the emperor is in the buff.

Those who have read it tell me Dispersing the Fog is a powerful and important story about the way Canada works and who is pulling the strings.

My brave publisher at Key Porter Books believes Dispersing the Fog is a landmark work�an elephant in the room that cannot be ignored forever. Just how long it will take to break through this journalistic blockade is anyone�s guess.

Thank you for letting me take this shower in public. And no, I have no problems sleeping at night.

 
 

For Information Concerning the Crisis in Darfur

click here


 

Northern Uganda Crisis

click here


 

 Whistleblowers Need Protection

 

 

Impatient Blaine Higgs drops health minister, Horizon CEO

$
0
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHG98qP-bTA&ab_channel=cpac

 


N.B. Premier Blaine Higgs replaces health minister, CEO of Horizon Health – July 15, 2022

1,012 views
Jul 15, 2022
112K subscribers
In a news conference in Fredericton, New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs announces that he is replacing Health Minister Dorothy Shephard and Horizon Health Network CEO Dr. John Dornan. Bruce Fitch will replace Shephard as the new health minister effective immediately and Melanie Melanson is the new CEO of Horizon Health Network. These changes come as the province deals with an overstretched health-care system and the death of a patient this week in an emergency waiting room in Fredericton. Higgs says that he has asked Horizon to investigate the death.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suyzo1bVVkQ

 


Southwest Magazine: New Brunswick Southwest MP John Williamson Interview

5 views
Jul 25, 2022
912 subscribers
MP John Williamson discusses historic inflation rates, the August 2022 closure of Grand Manan's only bank, the effects of ArriveCAN on Campobello Island tourism, the impending reduction of hours at the Vanceboro/St. Croix international border and more on CHCO-TV. Original Broadcast Date: July 2022

 

 ---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:12:18 -0300
Subject: Hey Higgy Methinls we all know why your buddy Dr. France
Desrosiers still won't speak with me N'esy Pas?
To: "bruce.fitch"<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "guy.arseneault"<guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>,
Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
David.Coon@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Premier@ontario.ca, normand.pelletier@dalhousie.ca,
lebrun@nb.aibn.com, Alysha.Elliott@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, monica@actuslaw.com, rene@actuslaw.com,
Jacques.Duclos@vitalitenb.ca, Thomas.Lizotte@vitalitenb.ca,
"Tim.RICHARDSON"<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>,
Brigitte.Sonier-Ferguson@vitalitenb.ca,
Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca
Cc: info@campbellton.org, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/emergency-room-death-edmundston-1.6531125

Edmundston ER death happened under 'much different' circumstances than Fredericton one, minister says

Public not being told what happened in 'tragic' Edmundston case because it's delicate, Vitalité says

A "tragic event" ended in the death of a person at the Edmundston emergency room, the Vitalité Health Network said Monday.

On Sunday, a person was admitted to the emergency department of the Edmundston Regional Hospital.

"The person ... lost their life under unforeseeable and exceptional circumstances," Dr. France Desrosiers, CEO of Vitalité, said in a news release.

The network has shared no details about the person, why they were in the emergency room, what happened leading up to the death, or the cause of death. 

"For confidentiality purposes and due to the delicate nature of the incident, no further details can be provided to the public at this time," Desrosiers said. 

This death comes on the heels of a death in the waiting room of the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital emergency room in Fredericton. That death triggered a major shakeup in health-care leadership in New Brunswick.

In response to a request for an interview, new Health Minister Bruce Fitch sent an emailed statement.

He said the circumstances of the Edmundston case were different from the Fredericton one but did not say how.

"I can't discuss the details surrounding this tragic event," Fitch said.

"It's important to note that the Department of Health must protect every individual's right to privacy — even those who are now deceased."

Fitch expressed his condolences to the family of the person who died Sunday. He said "an investigation will be completed," but did not say by whom.

No one from Vitalité was made available for an interview about the incident, although it happened in a part of the hospital members of the public use every day. 

Desrosiers said she was at the Edmundston hospital Monday speaking to staff.

Did service failure contribute to death?

It's not known how long the person was waiting for care, or whether a shortage of staff played a role in the death.

Jean-Claude D'Amours, Liberal health critic, said he doesn't have a lot of information about what happened, but "it's fair to let the health network do the investigation."

He said he would like to see what the investigation finds about what services were provided and if there was any lack of resources that led to the person's death.

"In the end I hope to see the detail … about the services that were provided, the services that were needed by that individual and understand in the end if it was the lack of resources, lack of services, that created that situation."

No one else hurt

Vitalité was asked whether mental health was a factor, in what capacity the police were involved and whether Vitalité kept track of unexpected ER deaths

"No further details can be provided," Vitalité spokesperson Thomas Lizotte said.

No employees or members of the medical staff were injured.

Desrosiers said a "comprehensive internal root cause assessment of the incident" is underway, and police and the coroner's office are also investigating.

"The Network also wishes to acknowledge the exemplary work and professionalism of its staff in handling this unfortunate incident," Desrosiers said.

"The Network extends its deepest condolences to the family and friends of the deceased."

Police try to understand

In response to a request for interview, the Edmundston Police Force issued a news release saying officers were called to the hospital on Sunday "to offer assistance following an event where a person unfortunately died in unexpected circumstances."

The force said it's investigating what happened " to better understand and assess the facts surrounding this unfortunate incident."

The news also comes as many hospitals are struggling with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and lack of staff. Some hospitals have reduced services, including the Edmundston hospital, and other emergency rooms have reduced hours.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Hadeel Ibrahim is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick based in Saint John. She's been previously awarded for a series on refugee mental health and for her work at a student newspaper, where she served as Editor-in-Chief. She reports in English and Arabic. Email: hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca. Twitter: @HadeelBIbrahim

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Desrosiers, Dr. France (VitaliteNB)"<Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 05:25:37 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : At least your lawyer Tim Ross can never
deny that I am still alive despite the fact I have been denied Heath
Care since 2008 when a doctor directed 3 members of the RCMP and two
hospital security guards to assault me CORRECT?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Je suis à l'extérieur du bureau jusqu'au 10 juillet.
Pour toute urgence, veuillez contacter M. Stépahen Legacy jusqu'au 7
juillet, puis, Dre Natalie Banville.

I'm away from the office until July 10th.
For any emergency, please contact M. Stephane Legacy until July 7th
than, Dre Natalie Banville.




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 14:38:52 -0300
Subject: Dr. France Desrosiers, Brent Babcock and CBC should never
deny the fact that I tried to talk Mayor Comeau today EH Chucky Murray
and Mr Higgs?
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "guy.arseneault"
<guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca,
Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
David.Coon@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>
Cc: info@campbellton.org, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Premier@ontario.ca,
normand.pelletier@dalhousie.ca, lebrun@nb.aibn.com,

Alysha.Elliott@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca

https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/elg/local_government/content/community_profiles/renderer.data.cities.2.html

Mayor
Ian Comeau

Councillors
Brent Babcock
Diane Cyr
Frédéric Daigle
Sterling (Fuzzy) Loga
Melanie Parent
Marco Savoie

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/campbellton-hospital-obstetrics-mayor-comeau-vitalite-ceo-bathurst-moose-fencing-1.6496691

Campbellton mayor secures meeting with head of Vitalité over lack of
obstetric services

Ian Comeau says 100-km drive through 'moose valley' to Bathurst
hospital is unacceptable

Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Jun 22, 2022 7:00 AM AT


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 18:27:46 -0300
Subject: Hey Higgy we all know why your buddy Dr. France Desrosiers
won't speak with me but I did manage to speak with Dr Hubert Dupuis
Trust that he knows why I agee with his litigation
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, "Roger.L.Melanson"
<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
Christian.R.Whalen@gnb.ca, Norman.Bosse@gnb.ca,
advocate-defenseur@gnb.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"
<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, mcu@justice.gc.ca, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, viltide@nb.sympatico.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
denis.landry2@gnb.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
info@campbellton.org, normand.pelletier@dalhousie.ca,
lebrun@nb.aibn.com, Alysha.Elliott@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca,
mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
alexandre.silberman@cbc.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca,
monica@actuslaw.com, rene@actuslaw.com, Jacques.Duclos@vitalitenb.ca,
Thomas.Lizotte@vitalitenb.ca, "Tim.RICHARDSON"
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, Brigitte.Sonier-Ferguson@vitalitenb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/egalit%C3%A9-sante-hospital-lawsuit-against-new-brunswick-1.6441288


Francophone lobby group questions delays in lawsuit over Vitalité's independence


Égalité Santé en français says delays could permit more ‘detrimental’
changes in N.B. health care

Alexandre Silberman · CBC News · Posted: May 04, 2022 3:54 PM AT

Dr. Hubert Dupuis, president of the francophone lobby group Égalité
Santé en français, speaks Wednesday at a news conference in Dieppe.
(Alexandre Silberman/CBC)

The Égalité Santé en français is continuing to try to force the New
Brunswick government to give the Vitalité Health Network increased
independence from government.

The francophone lobby group began a lawsuit in 2017, aiming to expand
community control for the health authority. The legal challenge argues
the province is infringing on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms by
not providing francophones "full and complete" control over Vitalité.

Dr. Hubert Dupuis, the group's president, said a preliminary inquiry
was expected to be held May 17 and 18. But he was informed last week
that the province decided to switch to an external legal firm, pushing
back proceedings.

"It seems like a strange tactic to delay the response to the questions
we've raised, but especially to give the government time to implement
other changes to the health care system to the detriment of the
francophone and Acadian community," he said in French.
Equality of services

At a Wednesday news conference at Dieppe's arts and culture centre,
members and supporters gathered to reiterate support for the lawsuit.

Égalité Santé en français also criticized the centralization of
health-care decisions, the new health-care plan and an inequality of
services and resources between Horizon and Vitalité.

It raised concerns that further centralization of decision-making
toward a "bilingual" model would result in reduced quality of
French-language services.

    Francophone lobby group sues province over Vitalité Health's independence

Dupuis said the delays appear to show the province is not prepared to
defend its position.

"We remind you that we filed our notice of lawsuit on June 17, 2017.
Did they just wake up?" he said at the news conference.

The Vitalité Health Network is one of two health authorities in the
province created by legislation. It has a board of directors, with
some members appointed and others elected.
The francophone lobby group Égalité Santé en français held a news
conference about its lawsuit against the province. It is pushing for
greater control over the Vitalité Health Network. (Alexandre
Silberman/CBC)

While the administration operates in French, the organization is
required to offer services to the public in both official languages.

The network's CEO is currently appointed by the province.

Égalité Santé en français is asking for that position and the board to
be elected by members of the community instead. It also wants the
province to ensure services offered at Vitalité are equal to those at
Horizon.

The lawsuit cites Article 16.1 of the charter, which guarantees
equality between French-speaking and English-speaking residents of New
Brunswick. It also refers to Law 88, which recognizes the equality of
both linguistic communities.

It asks for the court to recognize francophone rights to "distinct"
health institutions.

The province did not immediately respond to questions from CBC News
about the lawsuit.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Alexandre Silberman

Video Journalist

Alexandre Silberman is a video journalist with CBC New Brunswick based
in Moncton. He has previously worked at CBC Fredericton, Power &
Politics, and Marketplace. You can reach him by email at:
alexandre.silberman@cbc.ca

    Follow Alexandre on Twitter

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 15:33:54 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Réponse automatique : Hey Higgy Whereas Trudeau
TheYounger is our neck of the woods Methnks you dudes should ask him
many things beginning wth the standng of all your actions since Madame
Murphy was appointed Lt Gov N'esy Pas?
To: Brigitte.Sonier-Ferguson@vitalitenb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

BRIGITTE SONIER-FERGUSON. Profile photo of Brigitte Sonier Ferguson T
506.862.7512. F 506-862-7571. Brigitte.Sonier-Ferguson@vitalitenb.ca.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Desrosiers, Dr. France (VitaliteNB)"<Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 18:19:44 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Hey Higgy Whereas Trudeau TheYounger is
our neck of the woods Methnks you dudes should ask him many things
beginning wth the standng of all your actions since Madame Murphy was
appointed Lt Gov N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Je suis à l'extérieur du bureau jusqu'au 26 avril.
Pour toute urgence, veuillez contacter Mme Brigitte Sonier Ferguson.

I'm away from the office until april 26th.
For any emergency, please contact Mme Brigitte Sonier Ferguson.



On 4/19/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/04/appointment-of-unilingual-nb-lieutenant.html
>
> Monday, 18 April 2022
>
> Appointment of unilingual N.B. lieutenant-governor violated charter, judge
> rules
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-lieutenant-governor-brenda-murphy-1.6420040
>
> Appointment of unilingual N.B. lieutenant-governor violated charter, judge
> rules
> A Court of Queen's Bench judge has ruled that Prime Minister Justin
> Trudeau's 2019 appointment of unilingual Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy
> violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>
> Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appointed Brenda Murphy
> lieutenant-governor in 2019
> Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Apr 14, 2022 2:45 PM AT
>
> Brenda Murphy was appointed lieutenant-governor of New Brunswick in
> 2019 following the death of former Lt.-Gov. Jocelyne Roy Vienneau.
> (Submitted by Province of New Brunswick)
>
> Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's 2019 appointment of a unilingual
> lieutenant-governor in New Brunswick violated language guarantees in
> the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, a Court of Queen's Bench judge has
> ruled.
>
> Chief Justice Tracey DeWare says the charter's protections of New
> Brunswick's unique bilingual status means that a lieutenant-governor
> in this province must be bilingual.
>
> Brenda Murphy is not.
>
> DeWare stops short of calling the appointment unconstitutional and
> invalid, saying that declaring the position vacant would create chaos
> in New Brunswick.
>
> It would call into question all the laws Murphy has signed and the
> appointments and other cabinet decisions made in her name.
>
>     Acadian group launches legal challenge over unilingual
> lieutenant-governor
>     Brenda Murphy installed as New Brunswick's 32nd lieutenant-governor
>
> "Such a situation would create a legislative and constitutional crisis
> within the Province of New Brunswick which is not necessary to
> adequately vindicate the infringed language rights in question," she
> writes.
>
> She continues that her ruling should be "sufficient to ensure
> appropriate and prompt action on behalf of the government to rectify
> the situation," leaving it up to the federal government to decide on
> the timing and "the extent of that action."
>
> A spokesperson for Murphy said her office had not had time to digest
> the decision and had no comment yet.
>
> "This is a legal matter being dealt with at the federal level and
> questions should be directed there," said director of communications
> Alex Robichaud.
>
> In Calgary, Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland told reporters she
> was not aware of the decision.
>
> DeWare's ruling is based on three sections of the charter that apply
> only to New Brunswick.
>
>     Brenda Murphy 'humbled' to be appointed New Brunswick's new
> lieutenant-governor
>
> Section 16(2) declares that English and French have equal status "in
> all institutions of the legislature and government of New Brunswick,"
> while Section 16.1(2) requires the legislature and government to
> "preserve and promote" the equality of English and French.
>
> Section 20(2) guarantees the right of any New Brunswicker to
> communicate with or receive services from "any office of an
> institution of the legislature or government of New Brunswick" in
> English or French.
> Challenge not aimed at Murphy, group says
>
> The Acadian Society of New Brunswick launched the challenge, arguing
> that those sections apply to the lieutenant-governor's position.
>
> The federal government responded that because the appointment is made
> by the Governor General on the advice of the prime minister, it's not
> reviewable by courts.
>
> But DeWare found that because the challenge raised constitutional
> issues, the court had a duty to consider the case.
>
> President Alexandre Cédric Doucet said the association is not looking
> for Murphy to resign or be removed.
>
> "Let's be clear. This lawsuit has never been against the Honourable
> Brenda Murphy. It was against the process."
>
> Alexandre Cédric Doucet, president of the Acadian Society of New
> Brunswick, says the challenge wasn't about having Murphy removed from
> her role, but about forcing the federal government to amend the
> language criteria required for appointing lieutenant-governors.
> (Radio-Canada)
>
> He said the right response would be for the federal government to
> amend its legislation on bilingualism requirements in appointments to
> make clear future lieutenant-governors in New Brunswick must be
> bilingual.
> Ruling will likely be appealed, experts say
>
> Political scientist Stephanie Chouinard said while the ruling won't
> affect other provinces, similar charter provisions that apply to the
> federal government could have implications for Governors General.
>
> "There's no doubt in my mind that this decision will be appealed," she
> said.
>
> Gov. Gen. Mary Simon speaks English and Inuktitut but does not speak
> French.
>
> DeWare's ruling calls the litigation "an unavoidable intersection" of
> the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government and "an
> uncomfortable exercise" because of the complex jurisdictional
> questions.
>
> While language provisions of the charter and the laws don't normally
> require individuals to be bilingual, DeWare points out that the
> lieutenant-governor occupies a "peculiar and unique role."
>
> No one else can step into her role to fulfil her functions
> bilingually, the ruling says.
>
> "To simply argue that the requirements of bilingualism do not extend
> to a Lieutenant-Governor because she, as an individual, cannot be
> considered an 'institution' is a gross oversimplification of a complex
> question and fails to account for the unique character and
> constitutional quality of the role itself."
>
> University of New Brunswick law professor Kerri Froc called the ruling
> "an unreasonable interpretation" of the charter and predicted it would
> not survive an appeal.
>
> "This is also a massive overstep on the separation of powers," she
> said in a tweet. "As in unprecedented. As in, it will not stand."
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/long-term-care-new-brunswick-justin-trudeau-announcement-dalhousie-1.6423216
>
>
> Trudeau to make long-term care announcement in Dalhousie
>
> Prime minister will be joined by Social Development Minister Bruce
> Fitch and 2 federal ministers
>
> CBC News · Posted: Apr 19, 2022 12:59 PM AT
>
> Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is scheduled to be in Dalhousie at 3
> p.m. (Chad Hipolito/The Canadian Press)
>
> Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will be in northern New Brunswick today
> with Social Development Bruce Fitch to make a long-term care
> announcement.
>
> It will be held in Dalhousie at 3 p.m., according to the Prime
> Minister's Office.
>
> New Brunswick's federal ministers — Dominic Leblanc, minister of
> intergovernmental affairs, infrastructure and communities, and Ginette
> Petitpas Taylor, minister of official languages and minister
> responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency — will also
> attend.
>
> No other details have been released.
>
> Later in the day, Trudeau will visit a local daycare and meet with
> families to discuss early learning and child care, according to his
> itinerary.
> Pledged $9B during election campaign
>
> Last August, Trudeau said a re-elected Liberal government would spend
> $9 billion to address the dangerous shortfalls in Canada's long-term
> care sector that were exposed by the pandemic.
>
> Long-term care residents accounted for around 80 per cent of all
> reported COVID-19 deaths during the first wave of the pandemic, and
> continued to account for a disproportionate share of deaths until
> vaccines were made widely available.
>
> About $6.7 billion would be spent over four years to "improve the
> quality and availability of long-term care homes and beds," while $1.8
> billion would be spent over four years to raise the wages of personal
> support workers to at least $25 an hour and train 50,000 more of them.
>
> The Liberal plan also called for the creation of a new Safe Long-Term
> Care Act, which would set national standards of care in a sector that
> is governed almost entirely by the provinces and territories.
>
> But money for long-term care was one of a number of Liberal campaign
> promises left out of the 2022-23 federal budget.
>
> It projects just $1 million in new spending on long-term care beyond
> the 2021-2022 fiscal year.
>
> Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland blamed the pandemic and said it's
> now her job to "review and reduce" spending.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:05:55 +0000
> Subject: RE: Hey Higgy while you were meeting with the boyz a lady
> working for Dr. France.Desrosiers called me with private number in
> order to laugh and play dumb about my Health Care concerns EH?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write.
>
> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
> at the earliest opportunity.
>
> If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
> Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
> review and consideration.
>
> Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>
> En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
> informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
> meilleurs délais.
>
> Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
> secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
> pour examen et considération.
>
>
> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
> (506) 453-2144 or by email
> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>
>
> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>
>
>
> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
> P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1
> Canada
> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
> Email/Courriel:
> premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Bruce Hon. (SD/DS)"<Bruce.Fitch@gnb.ca>
> Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 03:05:56 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Higgy while you were meeting with the
> boyz a lady working for Dr. France.Desrosiers called me with private
> number in order to laugh and play dumb about my Health Care concerns
> EH?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email.  Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> If your request is Constituency related, please contact Kathy Connors
> at my Constituency office in Riverview at Kathy.Connors@gnb.ca or by
> phone at 506-869-6117.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
>
> Hon. Bruce Fitch
> MLA for Riverview
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
> Kathy Connors à mon bureau de circonscription à Riverview à
> Kathy.Connors@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506-869-6117.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
> L'hon. Bruce Fitch
> Député de Riverview
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Bruce Hon. (SD/DS)"<Bruce.Fitch@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 17:23:25 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Nicky Methinks David Coon and everybody
> else knows why I would never agree to Higgy's brand new plan for NB
> Power to deal with the Liebranos within the EUB N'esy Pas???
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email.  Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> If your request is Constituency related, please contact Kathy Connors
> at my Constituency office in Riverview at Kathy.Connors@gnb.ca or by
> phone at 506-869-6117.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
>
> Hon. Bruce Fitch
> MLA for Riverview
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
> Kathy Connors à mon bureau de circonscription à Riverview à
> Kathy.Connors@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506-869-6117.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
> L'hon. Bruce Fitch
> Député de Riverview
>
>
>
>
> On 3/22/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/atlantic-premiers-discuss-collaboration-1.6392416
>>
>>
>> Health-care collaboration on the table as Atlantic premiers finally
>> get in-person meeting
>>
>> Premiers discuss key issues, say they won't pursue permanent daylight
>> saving time unless other regions do
>>
>> Mia Urquhart · CBC News · Posted: Mar 21, 2022 6:07 PM AT
>>
>>
>> Pictured at the Council of Atlantic Premiers meeting in Halifax, from
>> left: Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston, New Brunswick Premier Blaine
>> Higgs, Prince Edward Island Premier Dennis King and Newfoundland and
>> Labrador Premier Andrew Furey. (Government of Nova Scotia)
>>
>> The four Atlantic premiers held their first in-person meeting since
>> before the pandemic on Monday, where they discussed a regional
>> approach to health care and other key regional issues.
>>
>> At the meeting, held in Halifax and chaired by Nova Scotia Premier Tim
>> Houston, the premiers talked about a unified effort to recruit and
>> retain health-care professionals and using potential "excesses" to
>> assist patients in neighbouring provinces.
>>
>> New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs said the four provinces are not in
>> competition with each other and will be working together to attract
>> health-care workers to the region.
>>
>> Higgs also said they discussed how provinces can share existing
>> resources. For example, if one area has an "excess" of some service,
>> it could be used by patients from other provinces.
>>
>> "If we have excess capability and we can utilize that, let's not get
>> hung up on where it is," Higgs said at a wrap-up briefing with the
>> media following the Council of Atlantic Premiers meeting.
>>
>> He said the patient's home province would pay for the service, but the
>> patient would have to travel to where the service is being offered.
>> Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston hosted the first in-person meeting of
>> the Atlantic premiers since before the pandemic. (Robert Short/CBC)
>>
>> Houston said all four Atlantic provinces are experiencing similar
>> challenges when it comes to health care.
>>
>> "It's safe to say that health care remains top of mind for each of our
>> provinces and our populations. The shortage of health-care workers is
>> not exclusive to Atlantic Canada, certainly not exclusive to Nova
>> Scotia. It's felt everywhere."
>>
>> Making it easier for health-care workers to travel between provinces
>> is part of the solution, he said.
>>
>> Currently, licensing criteria and fees structures are unique to each
>> province and complicate mobility between provinces.
>>
>> Making it easier for health-care workers to travel between provinces
>> means they could "move around and help each other out," Houston said.
>>
>> "We are one region and there's lots of family ties between them," he
>> said. "And so those are the opportunities that I'm looking forward
>> to."
>>
>> Houston said there was a "high degree of interest in harmonizing that
>> stuff."
>> Newfoundland Premier Andrew Furey said the ultimate goal would be for
>> one licensing system for health-care professionals like doctors.
>> (Government of Newfoundland and Labrador)
>>
>> Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Andrew Furey said "one of the
>> lessons learned from COVID … [is] that health-care mobility is
>> important."
>>
>> Furey, who has worked as a doctor around the world, said Canada is
>> fortunate to have "a robust licensing system that could be applied
>> blanket-statement to the whole country."
>>
>> "We are very well trained in Canada," he said. "Once you're licensed
>> in any jurisdiction, there's no reason to think that you shouldn't be
>> able to practice medicine somewhere else."
>>
>> Furey said the "exact model and instrument" still has to be
>> determined, but that a single entity controlling the licensing of
>> health-care professionals would be the goal.
>>
>> Health care was just one of the issues on the agenda. They also
>> discussed a regional approach to economic recovery, cost of living,
>> immigration and energy.
>> Daylight saving time
>>
>> The premiers also talked about the movement in other areas to
>> establish daylight saving time year-round.
>>
>> Prince Edward Island Premier Dennis King said islanders support the
>> idea of getting rid of the twice-yearly time change — as long as
>> they're not the only ones doing it.
>>
>> In the United States, one of the two chambers of Congress passed a
>> bill that would make daylight time permanent instead of the current
>> March-through-November schedule.
>>
>> The U.S. Senate passed the bill last week with support from both
>> parties. If it becomes law, it would mean an extra hour of daylight in
>> the evenings year-round.
>>
>> In Canada, Ontario has a law passed and ready to be implemented if New
>> York and Quebec do the same.
>>
>> "I think if that were to happen, we would have to react collectively
>> here in some way, shape or form," King said on Monday.
>>
>> "Essentially, we've all sort of decided that this doesn't make sense
>> for one of us to do this. If we are to proceed with something, it
>> would be … on a regional basis in response to what might be done in
>> other places."
>>
>> Higgs said there's also interest in New Brunswick in eliminating the
>> twice-yearly time change.
>>
>> But until other regions make a move, Higgs said, the Atlantic
>> provinces won't pursue it.
>> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> Mia Urquhart
>>
>> Mia Urquhart is a CBC reporter based in Saint John. She can be reached
>> at mia.urquhart@cbc.ca.
>>
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-19-vitalite-hospitals-red-alert-restrictions-health-care-workers-deficit-1.6387221
>>
>> COVID-19 is 'not over in hospitals,' head of Vitalité tells board
>> Social Sharing
>>
>>     Facebook
>>     Twitter
>>     Email
>>     Reddit
>>     LinkedIn
>>
>> CEO cites hospitalizations and staff absences being 'stable' over past
>> month, notes $24M operating deficit
>> Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Mar 16, 2022 7:11 PM AT |
>> Last Updated: March 16
>> Dr. France Desrosiers, president and chief executive officer of
>> Vitalité Health Network, said services are gradually resuming.
>> (Government of New Brunswick/YouTube)
>>
>> COVID-19 is "not over in hospitals," says the president and CEO of the
>> Vitalité Health Network.
>>
>> Dr. France Desrosiers made the comments during an update to the board
>> of directors Tuesday.
>>
>> New Brunswick lifted all of its COVID-19 restrictions Monday, but
>> Vitalité remains at the red alert level due to the number of
>> hospitalizations and absent health-care workers, Desrosiers said
>> during the public meeting.
>>
>> "The number of hospitalizations has remained stable I would say over
>> the last month. The number of absenteeism is also stable, but it is
>> still present.
>>
>> "So as soon as we are able to resume service, we resume it. Sometimes,
>> we have to revise downwards and we go back up as soon as possible
>> again."
>>
>> As of Saturday, the most recent figures available, there were 99
>> people with COVID-19 hospitalized across both the Vitalité and Horizon
>> health networks, down from 103 on Friday, including three people aged
>> 19 or under.
>>
>> Thirteen people required intensive care, down from 14, and seven of
>> them were on ventilators, unchanged.
>>
>> Of those in hospital, 46 were admitted for COVID-19, and 53 were
>> initially admitted for something else when they tested positive for
>> the virus. Of the 13 in an ICU, 11 are "for COVID" patients.
>>
>> The seven-day average of COVID-related hospitalizations increased to
>> 98 Saturday, from 96, while the seven-day average of COVID-related ICU
>> bed occupancies was 13, up from 12.
>> As of Saturday, 154 Vitalité health-care workers were off isolating
>> after testing positive for COVID-19. (Evan Mitsui/CBC)
>>
>> There were 513 health-care workers off Saturday after testing positive
>> for COVID-19, down from 577. That includes 154 from Vitalité, 300 from
>> Horizon and 59 from Extra-Mural and Ambulance New Brunswick.
>>
>> As of last Thursday, another 76 Vitalité health-care workers were
>> isolating because they had been a close contact of a positive case.
>>
>> Hospital capacity provincewide was listed at 90 per cent, up from 89
>> per cent on Friday, while ICU occupancy decreased to 71 per cent, from
>> 77 per cent.
>>
>> Vitalité and Horizon both announced last week that their hospitals and
>> health-care facilities would remain at the red level, despite the
>> province lifting all mandatory measures in the community.
>>
>> Vitalité is adjusting on a daily basis and services are gradually
>> resuming, said Desrosiers.
>> Pandemic-related costs for 2021-22 reach $26M
>>
>> But she noted the regional health authority recorded an operating
>> deficit of $24 million for the first nine months of the fiscal year,
>> largely due to additional expenses related to the pandemic.
>>
>> Desrosiers highlighted the challenges faced by human resources.
>>
>> "The network took into account that a significant number of
>> health-care workers had to be taken off the job due to the virus at
>> one time or another. The quick and efficient redeployment of resources
>> has made it possible to provide essential services and to cope with
>> the rapid increase in the number of hospitalized patients with
>> COVID-19," she said.
>>
>> Pandemic-related costs between April 1 and Dec. 31, 2021, totalled
>> $26.2 million, the board heard.
>>
>> "Through careful and responsible management of the pandemic's fifth
>> wave, we have emerged from this crisis with the sense that we did what
>> needed to be done," Desrosiers said in a statement.
>>
>>     Department of Education clarifies Russell's comments about
>> absenteeism triggering school closures
>>
>>     New Brunswick devises confusing way to measure vaccine protection
>>
>> Blood test and radiography services are almost completely restored,
>> with some backlog to be cleared up.
>>
>> Surgical services vary "from 75 to 80 per cent" of normal capacity,
>> depending on the location, said Desrosiers.
>>
>> "Sometimes there are areas that are 100 per cent, others are 50 per
>> cent. It really varies on a daily basis," she said.
>>
>> The province has passed the peak of the Omicron variant, according to
>> Dr. Jennifer Russell, the province's chief medical officer of health.
>>
>> "Yes, we do have a continued level of hospitalizations, but we're
>> managing," she told CBC on Monday.
>>
>> With the lifting of restrictions, some increases in hospitalizations
>> and cases are expected, said Russell.
>>
>> But they won't be overwhelming, she said, citing modelling, which has
>> not been made public.
>>
>> With files from Radio-Canada
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2022 13:19:03 -0400
>> Subject: Obviously Mayor Normand Pelletier is still complaining while
>> everyone ignores my personal concerns about Health Care EH Minister
>> Shephard and Kris Austin?
>> To: Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca, Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca,
>> David.Coon@gnb.ca, "Roger.L.Melanson"<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>,
>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, Christian.R.Whalen@gnb.ca, Norman.Bosse@gnb.ca,
>> advocate-defenseur@gnb.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Mike.Comeau"
>> <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, mcu@justice.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"
>> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
>> "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
>> <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, viltide@nb.sympatico.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
>> denis.landry2@gnb.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
>> info@campbellton.org, normand.pelletier@dalhousie.ca,
>> lebrun@nb.aibn.com, Alysha.Elliott@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
>> megan.mitton@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca,
>> mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> alexandre.silberman@cbc.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca,
>> monica@actuslaw.com, rene@actuslaw.com, Jacques.Duclos@vitalitenb.ca,
>> Thomas.Lizotte@vitalitenb.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)"<Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 17:30:32 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Kevin Arseneau before I go to the
>> hospital again called your cell and left a message Correct?
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.
>>
>> Should your issue be Constituency related, please contact Janet at my
>> constituency office at janet.johnston@gnb.ca or by calling 444-4530 or
>> 440-9542.
>>
>> Thanks again for taking the time to reach out to me with your concerns or
>> input.
>>
>> Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick Assemblée législative du
>> Nouveau-Brunswick
>> Office of Kris Austin, MLA                   Bureau de Kris Austin,
>> député
>> 506-462-5875                                   506-462-5875
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 11:39:16 -0300
>> Subject: Methinks Mr Higgs 'can't sit idly by' while my mental health
>> issues are addressed in public forums N'esy Pas Kris Austin?
>> To: Client.Advocate@gnb.ca, "jennifer.russell"
>> <jennifer.russell@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
>> "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"
>> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
>> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>> "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, mcu
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"
>> <Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
>> "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
>> premier <premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, pm
>> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Gerald.Butts"
>> <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Paul.Shuttle"
>> <Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
>> <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
>> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>
>> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
>> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
>>
>> Methinks Mr Higgs 'can't sit idly by' while my mental health issues
>> are addressed in public forums N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/09/province-cant-sit-idly-by-during-mental.html
>>
>>
>> #cdnpoli #nbpoli
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/blaine-higgs-mental-health-1.5296371
>>
>>
>>  Province 'can't sit idly by' during mental health crisis, Higgs says
>>
>>
>> 66 comments
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> I wonder if Kris Austin is reading this
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Methinks Mr Higgs 'can't sit idly by' while my mental health issues
>> are addressed in public forums N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Methinks its strange that the conservatives take a sudden interest in
>> mental health 11 long years after they had me falsely imprisoned in
>> the looney bin N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
>> not falsely
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: That is libel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Perhaps you should have your lawyer talk
>> to Dr Banic and the RCMP because I will be mentioning you within my
>> next lawsuit
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Are you related to the Federal Minister of
>> Health?
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: She used to work with the RCMP correct?
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Now you talk to yourself!
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Better yet are you a cop?
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Methinks you know as well as I why i
>> am posting my questions in this fashion to your new Light of Love
>> N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
>> wrong again
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
>> methinks you were released too soon! n'esy pas?
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Ask your lawyer why I am recording and
>> emailing your libel to your friends in the RCMP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Terry Tibbs
>> A plan, a plan, do you believe?
>> Is it me? Am I the only one hearing generalities, but no specifics?
>> We have to note, just the other day, both Scheer and Trudeau promised
>> big bucks in transfers for health care. So would it be prudent to
>> assume "business as usual" in the health care file until the money
>> fairy stops by? If the money fairy stops by?
>> We must remember too, you need a referral from a GP (typically your
>> family doctor) to see a mental health professional. So maybe the first
>> order of business would be addressing the shortage of GPs?
>> Whatever rabbit Mr Higgs pulls out of his hat, rebuilding a very
>> broken system will take time and money.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Its all just talk Higgs and his cohorts have
>> yet to provide me with a Health Care Card However 11 years ago the
>> liberals had no problem whatsoever squandering precious health care
>> resources by falsely imprisoning a political opponent in a mental ward
>> for the benefit of the conservative buddies Greg Thompson and Carl
>> Urquhart. Methinks the truly funny part of it all is that the shrinks
>> never got paid for their malicious services and now they try hard to
>> pretend it never happened and don't know who I am even though they
>> know I have the RCMP's documents with the doctor's signature N'esy
>> Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
>> things are really messed up in your alternative universe. If you were
>> placed in a mental facility then it was most certainly for just cause.
>> This is not done randomly. Furthermore, the physicians who attempted
>> to treat you were certainly paid by Medicare and if you think doctors
>> remember every single patient and document they may have signed while
>> on call or otherwise then i would suggest that you treatment was
>> unsuccessful.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Content disabled
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Dream on trust that Carl Urquhart and seven
>> car loads of cops tried the same trick again on election night 201 and
>> it backfired bigtime on them that time.Methinks you should checkout
>> YouTube sometime before you call me a liar N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>> Terry Tibbs
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor:
>> ANY "credible" professional keeps, besides computer records, a
>> handwritten daily log.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: I know I do Higgs and his cohort want to forget
>> that the RCMP used to pay me for my opinions Furthermore anyone can
>> Google me to see the reply to Taylor that was blocked
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Much to Taylor's chagrin I have the signed
>> document by the shrinks and the cops
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs:
>> agreed but then again why would they allow themselves to be harassed
>> by Amos the same way we are on this site? The probably told him they
>> don't remember to get rid of him. I wish we could do the same!
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Methinks that is more libel because I have
>> NEVER harassed ANYONE Hence you have no proof of it. However I do have
>> proof of my false arrest in writing signed by a doctor employed by the
>> government of New Brunswick and video of a member of the RCMP
>> admitting to his assault on me in the DECH. More importantly we have
>> your published comments today so that brings the matter up to date
>> N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jebidoah Shylah
>> Marijuana is only going to make it worse. If we can't ban this
>> dangerous drug, can we at least rename it 'Marijuana NB' instead of
>> Cannabis NB. Why sanitize this seedy habit.
>>
>>
>>
>> Mike Connors
>> Reply to @Jebidoah Shylah: You have got to be kidding. Cannabis is the
>> only thing keeping some soldiers alive that are suffering from PTSD
>> because we sent them to foreign countries to be shot at and see body
>> parts all over the place. We have seen the tragic results when this
>> has been taken away from them, so please educate yourself BEFORE you
>> speak next time.
>>
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> Reply to @Mike Connors: what about recreational marihuana?
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Who cares how much dope you SANB dudes
>> smoke?
>>
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: you are quite calm tonight! Are you on
>> valiums?
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: You can't argue so you insult and yet
>> you think you are clever. Methinks you are well aware that i have no
>> respect for the druggies and pill pushers who seem to be your
>> favourite people N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: whereas you are so respectful to all!
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Methinks I keep far better records
>> that you N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: in your "biased" opinion!
>>
>>
>>
>> Greg Smith
>> Reply to @Jebidoah Shylah: Great idea “Jebidoah”. While we’re at it,
>> let’s rebrand “NBLiquor” to “Ethanol NB”, and every gas station that
>> sells cigarettes as “Nicotine NB”, since neither of those make sense
>> either and follow your ridiculous model.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Methinks you should pull my old files
>> from the dockets of many courts on both sides of the medicine line and
>> look for some new ones too. Trust that you are about to be mentioned
>> in at least one lawsuit and you all knowing SANB dudes are well aware
>> of the many reasons why N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Greg Smith: True
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Methinks after all your malicious
>> nonsene last night the cat must have your tongue today N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> As if the elusive Higgs boson cares.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ian Scott
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Is that what you got from this? Maybe
>> move the idiotic mental health center in Campbelton to where it can be
>> operated properly instead of usual Liberal politics of the MLA's in
>> north.He at lest has acknowledged the problem more than any one in
>> last 4 years.And homeless issue blends right in.
>>
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> Reply to @Ian Scott: Ever since and before Confederation, all the
>> wealth has been transferred down south. It's about time that the north
>> gets its fair share. The comedian turned deputy Premier is not too
>> talkative since he won his Northeast riding. They gave him the title
>> just to mute him. He has always been droll, but not in the sense of
>> comical.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Why should the ringmaster at the
>> circus care what a clueless SANB dude thinks about anything
>> particularly in light of the fact that you still won'r admit that your
>> light of love Lou is a lady no matter how many times I tell you N'esy
>> Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug James
>> The policies of this province help cause mental illness. And now it is
>> telling us it is going to help solve the problem? Just look at the
>> overall healthcare system that is focused on treatment rather than
>> prevention and you'll understand just how impossible that will be.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Doug James: Cry me a river
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Donald Smith
>> Wow Mr. Higgs, province needs to focus more on mental health care, yet
>> another Media source has a front page news story today, Province Needs
>> More Psychiatrists Doctor says. If so, why don't we have them, its
>> either we Can't Afford Them, or we don't want to hire them, am I
>> seeing this wrong ??
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @Donald Smith:
>> Recrutement is a farce in NB...there are no billing numbers available
>> where they are needed. Simple fix but politicians pay lip service and
>> do nothing.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Yea right you should know
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
>> obviously
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: The real question is who is your lawyer and
>> does he or she know of your malice towards me?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> June Arnott
>> They will cut other services to help with the overdue Mental
>> Healthcare. It is so sad that they made cuts to MH decades ago. But
>> hey, at least the politicians still get their perks and raises!!
>>
>>
>>
>> Terry Tibbs
>> Reply to @June Arnott:
>> Hard to say. Both major applicants for the top federal job have
>> promised a visit from the health care money fairy if elected. So it
>> might be prudent to think that is the source of all the new found
>> health care spending that Mr Higgs is promising. I suspect we shall
>> have to wait and see...........
>> There is going to be a bit of a jackpot if regional government comes
>> to pass, though I suspect that payday has been spoken for elsewhere.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: FYI I have yet to get my Health Care card
>>
>>
>>
>> Terry Tibbs
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
>> If you are like me you don't need one because you don't get sick.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Terry Tibbs: I don't go to see the sawbones until I heard
>> the Grim Reaper knocking at my door. Whereas I have no Medicare Card I
>> paid a doctor to have look at me and he sent me straight to the
>> emergency room I have there twice this month and have been scheduled
>> for a raft of test for my old ticker. Heath Care card or not I am
>> entitled to the same service every other Canadian Citizen receives.
>> Now that I am a running for a seat in Parliament again methinks you
>> can bet dimes to dollars that I will be raising a lot of hell about
>> this N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jebidoah Shylah
>> Indeed those suffering from mental health problems need more help so
>> they can become productive members of society. If someone has a broken
>> leg, we don't write them off for life, we fix the leg. Why do people
>> not understand that mental health is the same as any part of the body,
>> fixable. When placed under immense stress and strain, it too can break
>> and because it's the hard rive of the body, it's essential we have the
>> best treatment for it. We also need to ban marijuana and make sure New
>> Brunswick is a drug free zone so that fewer people end up with mental
>> health issues that marijuana and other drugs are known to cause, and
>> so that more money is then available for those who have mental health
>> issues not self inflicted by drugs. It's an outrage that we are
>> subsidizing fancy stores for marijuana drug users while mental health
>> service suffers.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chantal LeBouthi
>> Reply to @Jebidoah Shylah:
>> Opioids is doing more damage and usually prescribe by doctors
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @Chantal LeBouthi:
>> yes to patients who shop around faking symptoms until some overworked
>> doc succumbs to the act and caves in. People need to accept
>> responsibility for their addictions and stop blaming everyone!
>>
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: it's the fault of both the doctors and the
>> patients in a lot of cases.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Methinks you found another Lou to love
>> After all you have something in common and that is you both despise me
>> and I am honoured that you do N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Chantal LeBouthi: Oh So True
>>
>>
>>
>> Marguerite Deschamps
>> Reply to @David Raymond Amos: sorry to burst your bubble, but I do not
>> despise yu.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Oh my my how quick you wish to forget
>> that you bragged of earlier today N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>> Lewis Taylor
>> Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps:
>> if the doctors are at fault then either they should be sued or have
>> their licenses revoked...why does this not happen? Heresay does not
>> equal guilt...if so then Amos would be right.
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Content disabled
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Methinks you are not clever enough to know
>> when to clam up N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Methinks your lawyer should pull Federal Court
>> File no T-1557-15 in Fat Fred City ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/dalhousie-s-walk-in-clinic-remains-closed-without-definitive-reopening-date-1.6372008
>>
>> Dalhousie's walk-in clinic remains closed without definitive reopening
>> date
>>
>> Region's only walk-in clinic has been closed for over a month
>> Alexandre Silberman · CBC News · Posted: Mar 04, 2022 7:00 AM AT
>>
>> The St. Joseph Community Health Centre in Dalhousie, N.B. was once a
>> hospital with 100 beds. (Alexandre Silberman/CBC)
>>
>> The Restigouche region's only walk-in clinic will not reopen this week
>> as expected.
>>
>> The clinic at the St. Joseph Community Health Centre in Dalhousie
>> closed its doors at the end of January in response to a staffing
>> shortage. At the time, the Vitalité Health Network said the temporary
>> closure would only last a month.
>>
>> But this week, it remained closed with no clear timeline on if or when
>> the clinic will start taking patients again.
>>
>> Dalhousie Mayor Normand Pelletier said residents without a primary
>> care provider or facing long waits for an appointment don't know where
>> to turn to.
>>
>> "They're extremely disappointed, they're scared," he said. "They don't
>> know where they're going to go for medical help in Restigouche County
>> anymore."
>>
>>     Dalhousie residents demand improved doctor recruitment after
>> clinic temporarily closes
>>
>> Residents held a protest last month calling on the health authority to
>> improve recruitment of health care providers. At the time of the
>> clinic's closure, only two out of six physician positions were filled
>> – with one doctor on leave.
>>
>> The Vitalité Health Network has not announced a new reopening date.
>> Dalhousie Mayor Normand Pelletier said residents are worried about the
>> temporary closure of the walk-in clinic at the St. Joseph Community
>> Health Centre. (Alexandre Silberman/CBC)
>>
>> Spokesperson Thomas Lizotte said all other services at the community
>> health centre, including a collaborative practice and ambulatory
>> services, remain available to patients.
>>
>> "Discussions are still ongoing with the Department of Health to ensure
>> strategic alignment with the new Health Plan," Thomas wrote in an
>> email.
>>
>> There are 4,200 patients with a regular primary care provider at the
>> collaborative practice.
>>
>> In an interview last month, Jacques Duclos, vice-president of
>> community services and mental health, said family physicians found the
>> workload of the walk-in clinic "unsustainable" because it took away
>> from the collaborative practice.
>>
>> He said discussions are focused on rethinking the primary care model,
>> spurred by the province's new health plan and improvements to virtual
>> care.
>>
>> WATCH / Closure of only walk-in clinic has aging community worried
>> Dalhousie's only walk-in clinic closes amid 'major crisis' in staffing
>> 15 days ago
>> Duration 3:03
>> Residents are calling on the Vitalité Health Network to improve
>> recruitment of doctors and nurses for the Restigouche region. 3:03
>>
>> Restigouche County has one of the province's oldest populations and is
>> facing a significant shortage of 13 primary care providers. Without
>> the clinic, residents have been waiting at the emergency room at the
>> Campbellton Regional Hospital, or driving an hour south to Bathurst.
>>
>> Pelletier said town council and the regional service commission have
>> heard no updates on recruitment since the demonstration. Now, he's
>> requesting a meeting with Health Minister Dorothy Shepard to ask for
>> increased control locally.
>>
>> "Probably we'd be better served under Horizon," he said.
>>
>> During the pandemic, the clinic had shifted to an appointment-only
>> model. Patients could no longer just show up and instead needed to
>> call in to get a spot.
>> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
>> Alexandre Silberman
>>
>> Video Journalist
>>
>> Alexandre Silberman is a video journalist with CBC New Brunswick based
>> in Moncton. He has previously worked at CBC Fredericton, Power &
>> Politics, and Marketplace. You can reach him by email at:
>> alexandre.silberman@cbc.ca
>>
>>     Follow Alexandre on Twitter
>>
>> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:23:02 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: RE NB Mental Hospitals et Aujourd'hui en Acadie
>> To: monica@actuslaw.com, rene@actuslaw.com
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca
>>
>> https://www.vitalitenb.ca/en/network/board-directors/members-board-directors
>>
>> Monica L. Barley
>>
>> Moncton
>>
>> Ms. Barley has been a lawyer for over 15 years. She now handles
>> defence and litigation proceedings in the fields of inheritance law,
>> contractual law, employment law and administrative law.
>>
>> Her professional experience also enabled her to serve, as Chair and as
>> member, on various boards of directors, such as those of 3 plus
>> Economic Development Corporation, the Crossroads for Women Inc. as
>> well as the Centre de pédiatrie sociale Sud-Est Inc.
>>
>>
>> https://actuslaw.ca/monicas-bio
>>
>> MONICA L. BARLEY – Partner
>>
>> Monica L. Barley obtained a Bachelor of Science in physics and
>> mathematics from the Université de Moncton before entering the Faculty
>> of Law to pursue her lifelong dream of becoming a lawyer.
>>
>> After being called to the bar in 2002, Monica became an associate
>> lawyer at Forbes Roth Basque and went on to be a federal crown
>> prosecutor.  In 2010, Monica began her career at Actus Law Droit,
>> where she became partner in 2012.
>>
>> In her practice, she focuses on dispute resolution, which includes
>> will and estates disputes, employment law, contract law,
>> administrative law and criminal law. In March 2014, Monica was
>> appointed Chair of The Financial and Consumer Services Tribunal. The
>> Tribunal is an independent adjudicative body, which holds hearings and
>> appeals under New Brunswick financial and consumer services
>> legislation.
>>
>> A strong believer in giving back, Monica has held several volunteer
>> roles. She is a past board member of Alternative Residences Inc., a
>> non-profit organization that strives to provide and assist individuals
>> living with a mental illness in finding housing; former President of
>> Crossroads for Women Inc., a shelter for women and children victims of
>> family violence; former Vice-President of Downtown Moncton
>> Centre-ville Inc.; and a former board member of 3 plus Economic
>> Development Corporation. She was chair of the Elder Law Section of the
>> New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian Bar Association and is now
>> President of Social Pediatric Center of Southeast New Brunswick.
>>
>> A self-described golf addict, Monica and her husband Kolin live in
>> Moncton.
>>
>> Monica L. Barley
>> Called to the bar: 2002 (NB)
>> Actus Law Droit
>> Partner
>> 900 Main St.
>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 1G4
>> Phone: 506-854-4040
>> Fax: 506-854-4044
>> Email: monica@actuslaw.com
>>
>> René J. Basque
>> Called to the bar: 1989 (NB); Q.C.2013 (NB)
>> Actus Law Droit
>> Partner
>> 900 Main St.
>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 1G4
>> Phone: 506-854-4040
>> Fax: 506-854-4044
>> Email: rene@actuslaw.com
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 01:06:55 +0000
>> Subject: RE: I see that one of the Conservatives' best friends Rene
>> Basque the first Acadian to head the CBA is as much of a crybaby about
>> LIEbranos, Judges and "Justice" as your are N'esy Pas Chucky Lelanc?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.  Please be
>> assured  that your email will be reviewed and if a response is
>> requested, it will be forthcoming.
>>
>>
>> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
>> Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre  courriel sera examiné
>> et qu’une réponse vous parviendra à sa demande.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:12:04 +0000
>> Subject: RE: RE NB Mental Hospitals et Aujourd'hui en Acadie
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Thank you for taking the time to write.
>>
>> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
>> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
>> at the earliest opportunity.
>>
>> If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
>> Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
>> review and consideration.
>>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
>>
>> En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
>> informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
>> meilleurs délais.
>>
>> Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
>> secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
>> pour examen et considération.
>>
>>
>> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
>> (506) 453-2144 or by email
>> media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>
>>
>> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
>> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
>>
>>
>> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
>> P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1
>> Canada
>> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
>> Email/Courriel:
>> premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:09:57 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: RE NB Mental Hospitals et Aujourd'hui en Acadie
>> To: Jacques.Duclos@vitalitenb.ca, "Roger.Brown"
>> <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
>> David.Coon@gnb.ca, "Roger.L.Melanson"<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>,
>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, Christian.R.Whalen@gnb.ca, Norman.Bosse@gnb.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
>> advocate-defenseur@gnb.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Mike.Comeau"
>> <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca
>>
>> CHRISTIAN WHALEN
>> Senior Legal Counsel
>> Office of the Child and Youth Advocate
>> Contact Information
>>
>> Phone : (506) 453-2789
>> Fax : (506) 453-5599
>> Email : Christian.R.Whalen@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:16:48 -0300
>> Subject: RE NB Mental Hospitals et Aujourd'hui en Acadie
>> To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
>> <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
>> "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
>> <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, viltide@nb.sympatico.ca,
>> Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca,
>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
>> info@campbellton.org, normand.pelletier@dalhousie.ca,
>> lebrun@nb.aibn.com, Alysha.Elliott@gnb.ca,
>> Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
>> Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
>> bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
>> jbosnitch@gmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
>> Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"
>> <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>
>>
>> https://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelle/1799963/ngola-blaine-higgs-coronavirus-nouveau-brunswick-defi-informations?cid=rg_il-reg_txt_inf_infolettre-matinale_acadie-2021-06-09_0
>>
>> Loin de s'excuser, le premier ministre Higgs met au défi le Dr Ngola
>> Le Téléjournal Atlantique
>> Blaine Higgs met au défi le Dr Ngola
>> Montage de deux photos du docteur Ngola et du premier ministre Higgs.
>>
>> Le docteur Jean-Robert Ngola, médecin (à gauche) et Blaine Higgs,
>> premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick (à droite).
>>
>> Photo : Mia Sheldon (CBC) et Andrew Vaughan (La Presse canadienne)
>>
>> Radio-Canada
>> 2021-06-08 | Mis à jour aujourd’hui à 12 h 59
>>
>> Le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick Blaine Higgs a publiquement
>> mis au défi le Dr Jean-Robert Ngola en lui demandant de l'autoriser à
>> révéler des informations privées potentiellement incriminantes. Un
>> geste qui n’est pas passé inaperçu par l’opposition, mardi.
>>
>> Le Dr Ngola faisait face, jusqu'à tout récemment, à des accusations
>> pour avoir enfreint la loi sur les mesures d’urgence durant la
>> pandémie. Ces accusations ont été abandonnées vendredi.
>>
>> Blaine Higgs, qui refuse toujours de s’excuser, dit maintenant détenir
>> des informations possiblement compromettantes, mais qu’il ne peut
>> divulguer en vertu de la Loi sur la protection de la vie privée.
>>
>> "J’ai de l’information qui n’a jamais été révélée publiquement",
>> a-t-il lancé mardi.
>> À lire aussi :
>>
>>     Ajournement des procédures pour le Dr Ngola au Nouveau-Brunswick
>>     Le Dr Jean-Robert Ngola est-il réellement le patient zéro?
>>
>> Blaine Higgs demande au Dr Ngola de promettre de ne pas le poursuivre
>> pour violation de la vie privée, ce qui lui permettrait de dévoiler
>> l’information demeurée secrète jusqu’ici.
>> Une attaque envers un citoyen racialisé, selon les avocats
>>
>> L'équipe de défense du Dr Ngola a vivement dénoncé les propos de
>> Blaine Higgs. Elle se demande à quelles informations il fait
>> référence.
>>
>> "Si M. Higgs a d’autres preuves, rien ne l'empêche de nous les envoyer
>> à nous, les avocats du Dr Jean-Robert Ngola. De cette façon, Dr Ngola
>> n’aura pas à renoncer à son droit à la vie privée comme le demande M.
>> Higgs", écrivent dans une déclaration les avocats Christian Michaud et
>> Joël Étienne.
>> Un homme barbu assis dans un bureau parle à une caméra.
>>
>> Christian Michaud, avocat, défend le Dr Robert Ngola. Il exige des
>> excuses du premier ministre envers son client.
>>
>> Photo : Radio-Canada / Paul Landry
>>
>> Ils rappellent que le médecin a fait l'objet de "l’enquête la plus
>> complète à laquelle un citoyen ait jamais été confronté dans
>> l'histoire du Nouveau-Brunswick" et qu'il a été entièrement disculpé
>> vendredi.
>>
>> "Le premier ministre Higgs a utilisé son titre et son privilège
>> parlementaire pour attaquer un citoyen racialisé et un homme
>> innocent", déclarent-ils.
>>
>> Les avocats ont donné sept jours au premier ministre pour s'excuser à
>> la suite de l'abandon des accusations. Ils envisagent des actions
>> supplémentaires s'ils n'en obtiennent pas d'ici la fin de la semaine.
>> À écouter :
>>
>>     Un des avocats du Dr Ngola réagit aux propos de Blaine Higgs
>>
>> Inacceptable, dit l'opposition
>>
>> Les paroles du premier ministre ont été vivement dénoncées par
>> l’opposition à Fredericton.
>>
>> Le chef du Parti vert du Nouveau-Brunswick, David Coon, a indiqué
>> qu’il était "inacceptable" pour le premier ministre "d’avoir un enjeu
>> personnellement avec un citoyen du Nouveau-Brunswick."
>> Le chef du Parti vert du Nouveau-Brunswick, David Coon.
>>
>> Le chef du Parti vert du Nouveau-Brunswick, David Coon.
>>
>> Photo : Radio-Canada
>>
>> Le député libéral de Moncton-Centre, Rob Mckee, a pour sa part ajouté
>> qu’il était "inquiétant" que le premier ministre détienne de
>> l’information personnelle liée au Dr Ngola.
>>
>> "Ça veut dire qu’il est en possession d’information privée que
>> seulement le bureau du procureur devrait avoir, en ce qui concerne la
>> poursuite publique contre le docteur, donc pourquoi est-ce que le
>> premier ministre est en possession de ces informations", a-t-il
>> demandé.
>> Rob McKee donne un point de presse
>>
>> Le député libéral de Moncton Centre, Rob McKee.
>>
>> Photo : CBC
>>
>> "Ce n’est vraiment pas la façon dont un premier ministre devrait
>> agir", a ajouté Rob Mckee.
>>
>> Blaine Higgs n’a pas voulu expliquer pourquoi il était en possession
>> d’informations personnelles concernant le Dr Ngola.
>>
>> D'après le reportage de Michel Corriveau
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:42:46 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: RE NB Mental Hospitals etc Why not ask Brad Green's
>> former assistant Chucky Murray and his blogging buddy Chucky Leblanc
>> about the document hereto attached?
>> To: viltide@nb.sympatico.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca,
>> kris.austin@gnb.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
>> brian.gallant@gnb.ca, robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Colin.McPhail@cbc.ca
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/tide-head-school-closure-policy-409-mayor-randy-hunter-1.5070564
>>
>> Village mayor fights to give school on the chopping block a 2nd act
>> Small Tide Head School was voted to close after years of declining
>> enrolment
>> Colin McPhail · CBC News · Posted: Mar 26, 2019 6:00 AM AT
>>
>>
>> Tide Head Village Office
>>
>> 6 Mountain St.
>> Tide Head, NB
>> Phone: (506) 789-6550
>> Fax: (506) 789-6553
>> Email: viltide@nb.sympatico.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:07:11 -0400
>> Subject: RE NB Mental Hospitals etc Why not ask Brad Green's former
>> assistant Chucky Murray and his blogging buddy Chucky Leblanc about
>> the document hereto attached?
>> To: info@campbellton.org, normand.pelletier@dalhousie.ca,
>> lebrun@nb.aibn.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Alysha.Elliott@gnb.ca,
>> hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca
>>
>> On 3/25/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/restigouche-hospital-youth-centre-ombud-report-northern-mayors-1.5066125
>>>
>>> North-south tension rises as leaders fear losing troubled youth mental
>>> health centre
>>>
>>> Northern mayors say moving centre out of Campbellton would be major loss
>>> Colin McPhail · CBC News · Posted: Mar 25, 2019 6:00 AM AT
>>>
>>> https://healthstandards.org/board-directors/george-weber/
>>>
>>> https://healthstandards.org/executive-team/
>>> Health Standards Organization
>>> 1150 Cyrville Road
>>> Ottawa, ON, Canada
>>> K1J 7S9
>>>
>>> Phone
>>> +1 613-738-3800
>>>
>>> Leslee J. Thompson ext 222
>>>
>>> George Weber
>>> Board Chair
>>>
>>> George Weber has served as President and CEO of the Royal Ottawa
>>> Health Care Group, one of four standalone specialized mental health
>>> facilities in Ontario, since 2007.
>>>
>>> Over the previous 26 years, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of
>>> a number of national organizations, such as the Canadian Red Cross and
>>> Canadian Dental Association, as well as various international
>>> organizations, including the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
>>> Societies in Geneva, Switzerland.
>>>
>>> Throughout his career, he has been involved in health and humanitarian
>>> work from multiple dimensions, including dental accreditation. George
>>> holds a Master’s degree from McGill University and has completed the
>>> Advanced Management Program from the Graduate School of Business
>>> Administration, Harvard University, the International Program for
>>> Board Members from the Institute of Management Development in
>>> Lausanne, Switzerland and the Directors course sponsored by the
>>> Institute of Corporate Directors and the Rotman School of Management,
>>> University of Toronto.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 14:30:57 -0400
>>> Subject: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of Ombud NB too After all
>>> he is the same politically appointed lawyer N'esy Pas?
>>> To: premier@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
>>> andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
>>> robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
>>> Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
>>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
>>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre
>>> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch@gmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
>>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>>> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
>>> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> ---------- Original  message ----------
>>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:13:29 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of your
>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>>> valued.
>>>
>>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>>
>>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>>> response may take several business days.
>>>
>>> Thanks again for your email.
>>> ______­­
>>>
>>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>>
>>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>>
>>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>>
>>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original  message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:13:26 -0400
>>> Subject: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of your Acting Integrity
>>> Commissioner N'esy Pas?
>>> To: premier@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
>>> andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.cabrian.gallant@gnb.ca,
>>> robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
>>> Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
>>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.camichelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
>>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.c, mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre
>>> andre@jafaust.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
>>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>>> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
>>> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpOY5yzB9-8
>>>
>>> New Brunswick Ombudsman Charles Murray on report regarding The
>>> Restigouche Hostipal Centre!
>>> 119 views
>>> Charles Leblanc
>>> Published on Feb 8, 2019
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>>> years.
>>>
>>>
>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>>> productive use of either of our time.
>>>
>>>
>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>>> given due consideration.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>>
>>> Charles Murray
>>>
>>> Ombud NB
>>>
>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:09:18 -0300
>>> Subject: So your buddy Charles Murray has my documents now N'esy Pas
>>> Chucky Baby?
>>> To: charles.murray@gnb.ca, Charles.McAllister@snb.ca, premier
>>> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25
>>> <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kim.macpherson@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, briangallant10
>>> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, execdirgen <execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>
>>>
>>> CBC
>>> 3 new watchdogs appointed
>>> Premier names child and youth advocate, official languages
>>> commissioner and ombudsman
>>> CBC News Posted: Jun 14, 2013 3:24 PM
>>>
>>>
>>> The new ombudsman is Charles Murray, a civil servant and former
>>> political assistant to one-time Tory MP Elsie Wayne and to former PC
>>> cabinet minister Brad Green.
>>>
>>> "I am confident that their experience and education will help them to
>>> carry out their respective duties effectively," said Premier David
>>> Alward.
>>>
>>> He said Murray's appointment is not political.
>>>
>>> YEA RIGHT DAVEY BABY
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbDs3NUo-Nk
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Evelyn Greene
>>> To: charles.mcallister@snb.ca ; blaine.higgs@gnb.ca ;
>>> kim.macpherson@gnb.ca ; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ;
>>> david.alward@gnb.ca ; charles.murray@gnb.ca ; madeleine.dube@gnb.ca ;
>>> ken.ross@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: don.forestell@gnb.ca ; dhashey@coxandpalmer.com
>>> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 6:32 PM
>>> Subject: RE: Ambulance New Brunswick Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. McAllister:  Ambulance New Brunswick Inc. is also CROWN
>>> CORPORATION UNDER PART III OF THE PUBLIC LABOR RELATIONS ACT, AND WHY
>>> WOULD NOT NOT KNOW THAT.  PLEASE ADVISE.  ALSO, MS. RENEE LAFOREST
>>> DOES NOT GET BACK TO ME.  DO YOU HAVE HER EMAIL.  MY FRIEND SALLY AND
>>> I WENT THERE TODAY AND WAS TOLD THAT SHE WAS IN A MEETING.  SO WHO
>>> MAKES THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE THE BOOKS AS PER THE
>>> PUBLIC RIGHTS AS TAXPAYERS?
>>>
>>>
>>> EVELYN GREENE  ALSO, THE LETTERS PATENT ARE NOT WITNESSED AS PER THE
>>> REGULATIONS UNDER THE COMPANY'S ACT.  COULD YOU COMMENT ABOUT THAT.
>>> WHY WOULD IT HAVE GONE THRU YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PROPER ATTENTION TO
>>> THE LAWYER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THE CO. THAT ALL IS IN COMPLIANCE
>>> WHICH IT ISN'T. LOOK AT THE DOCUMENTS FOR MEDAVIE EMS AND NB EMS AND
>>> TELL ME IF THEY WERE WITNESSED PROPERLY?
>>>
>>> SEND THIS ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INCLUDING DAVID HASHEY'S CLIENT,
>>> DONALD PETERS AND CHARLES MURRAY WHO BY WAY OF THE LEGISLATION ARE IN
>>> CONFLICT BY BEING ON THE BOARDS.  PLEASE CONFIRM?  I WANT TO KNOW HOW
>>> TO ACCESS THE BOOKS OF AMBULANCE N.B. INC. WHICH IS A PUBLIC
>>> CORPORATION WHICH IS PARTNERED WITH ANOTHER CO. N.B. EMS WHICH IS
>>> PARTNERED WITH MEDAVIE EMS MAKING THEM ALL SUBSIDIARIES AND ALL
>>> SHAREHOLDERS OF THE SUBSIDIARIES CAN GET LOAN GUARANTEES AND OTHER
>>> BENEFITS BUT WHY WAS THIS DEAL NOT PUT OUT FOR A COST ANALYSIS AND
>>> BIDDING AS PER THE RULES?
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> From: Charles.McAllister@snb.ca
>>> To: evelyngreene@live.ca
>>> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:49:31 -0400
>>> Subject: Ambulance New Brunswick Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is further to our discussion today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As indicated, this company is incorporated and subject to the
>>> Companies Act. You can access the Act at the following link:
>>>
>>> http://laws.gnb.ca/en/BrowseTitle
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The company’s head office location is as follows: Department  of
>>> Health, 520  King Street, Fredericton. You had asked me exactly where
>>> at 520 King Street is the head office. An ANB official indicates it is
>>> at the fourth floor of 520 King Street –which is occupied as well by
>>> offices of the Dept of Health.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You indicated you wish to attend and examined certain records of ANB.
>>> I have provided you with a contact name: Renee LaForest (phone number
>>> 453-3759). It is our understanding she is the secretary-treasurer of
>>> ANB.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I have indicated under the Companies Act, the relevant provisions
>>> regarding access is as follows:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> BOOKS OF THE COMPANY
>>>
>>> 104The company shall cause books to be kept by the secretary, or by
>>> some other officer or agent specially charged with that duty, wherein
>>> shall be kept recorded
>>>
>>> (a)a copy of the letters patent incorporating the company, and any
>>> supplementary letters patent, and of all by-laws of the company;
>>>
>>> (b)the names alphabetically arranged of all persons who are or have
>>> been shareholders;
>>>
>>> (c)the address and calling of every such person while a shareholder,
>>> as far as can be ascertained;
>>>
>>> (d)the number of shares of stock held by each shareholder;
>>>
>>> (e)the amounts paid in and remaining unpaid respectively on the stock
>>> of each shareholder;
>>>
>>> (f)all transfers of stocks, with the date and other particulars of the
>>> transfer, and the date of the entry thereof;
>>>
>>> (g)the names, addresses and callings of all persons who are or have
>>> been directors of the company, with the several dates at which each
>>> became or ceased to be a director;
>>>
>>> (h)minutes of all meetings of shareholders, directors and executive
>>> committee.
>>>
>>> R.S., c.33, s.103.
>>>
>>> 105(1)A book called the register of transfers shall be provided, and
>>> in the book shall be entered the particulars of every transfer of
>>> shares in the capital of the company.
>>>
>>> 105(2)One or more branch registers of transfers may be kept at places
>>> appointed by the directors.
>>>
>>> 105(3)Every transfer made at a branch registry shall be forthwith
>>> reported to the head office of the company.
>>>
>>> R.S., c.33, s.104.
>>>
>>> 106(1)Such books, with the exception of the minute books of the
>>> directors and executive committee, shall, during reasonable business
>>> hours of every day except Sundays and holidays, be kept open at the
>>> head office of the company or at such place as may be authorized under
>>> subsection (2) or (3) of this section, for the inspection of
>>> shareholders and creditors of the company and their personal
>>> representatives, and of any judgment creditor of a shareholder.
>>>
>>> 106(2)The Lieutenant-Governor in Council upon cause being shown to him
>>> may by order designate some other office of the company in the
>>> Province as the place where its books may be kept for the purposes of
>>> subsection (1).
>>>
>>> 106(3)Where an agent with an established place of business in the
>>> Province is appointed by the company for the purpose of recording the
>>> transfer of its shares, the book, in which are recorded the
>>> particulars mentioned in paragraphs 104(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f), may
>>> be kept at the agent’s place of business in the Province where the
>>> register of transfers is kept.
>>>
>>> 106(4)Every such shareholder, creditor or personal representative or
>>> judgment creditor may make extracts therefrom.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The definition section of the Act states as follows:
>>>
>>> “shareholder” means every subscriber to, or holder of, stock in the
>>> company, and includes every member of a company without share capital
>>> and the personal representatives of the shareholder;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As discussed with you, you do not seem to fall within the scope of
>>> section 106(1) to entitle you to see the records of ANB that are
>>> mentioned in section 104 of the Act.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You have expressed the view you are entitled to see the above records
>>> and perhaps other records, notwithstanding that you do not fall
>>> presently within s 106(1). To what extent you have other legal rights
>>> to see the above records (or other records), you will need to pursue
>>> that viewpoint with ANB, not with myself.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Charles McAllister
>>>
>>> Director- Companies Act
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Evelyn Greene
>>> To: ndesrosiers@ccla.org ; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ;
>>> lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
>>> sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca ; hubert.lacroix@cbc.ca ; andy.campbell@ctv.ca
>>> ; steve.murphy@ctv.ca ; w5@ctv.ca ; russomanno@wsgalaw.com ;
>>> kim.macpherson@gnb.ca ; heather.webb@gnb.ca ; david.alward@gnb.ca ;
>>> marie.claudeblais@gnb.ca ; madeleine.dube@gnb.ca ;
>>> charles.murray@gnb.ca
>>> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:53 PM
>>> Subject: FW: Disclosure still outstanding
>>>
>>>
>>> I am sending this to you folks as a beginning of some information you
>>> need to know.  On May 13, 2011, the day I was beaten up by police at
>>> Ambulance New Brunswick on 24 Harold Doherty Dr., in Fredericton, I
>>> had originally agreed to meet with Charles LeBlanc for the first at
>>> the front of the Legislature.  I had spoken with my MLA Brian
>>> MacDonald on the 12th and I made him aware that I was doing the
>>> interview due to him and others not looking into the corruption.
>>>
>>> On May 13, 2011, I later learned that Premier David Alward and Health
>>> Minister Madeleine Dube had gone to Moncton or St. John and I believe
>>> it was to open an ambulance or to do with something about a new part
>>> of the hospital.  I sort of flagged this in mind because I thought
>>> this is convenient that they are both out of town when I got beaten.
>>>
>>> I had arranged a few days earlier to meet Charles LeBlanc however,
>>> that morning I wrote him an email and cancelled saying I was not well
>>> which was true as is in the police records when they charged me.
>>> However, the timeline to deliver the Right to Information was up that
>>> day and in the afternoon I forced myself to go downtown and serve
>>> them.  I first went to Cox and Palmer Law Firm, then to the Court
>>> House to see Craig Carleton and then to the N.B. Police Commission and
>>> secretary/receptionist Julie Williams accepted the documents.
>>>
>>> Then I went to Ambulance N.B. where they seemingly were expecting me.
>>> I felt then as I do today that they were call by someone and were
>>> expecting me.
>>>
>>> 1. On the day of that Friday, May 13, 2011, I had an email from
>>> Charles LeBlanc saying all of a sudden his blog was shut down.
>>> However, as I reported at the time, I smelled a rat and I told Mr.
>>> LeBlanc this and later after that day I asked to do an interview in
>>> front of the Justice Bld. and Charles LeBlanc refused, saying he was
>>> interviewing Mayor Woodside at City Hall.  Then there was this big ten
>>> minute or more interview on Charles' blog with the Mayor and the Mayor
>>> was saying things like, "When I pick you up in the winter and give you
>>> a drive ........ (this was to Charles).  I smelled a rat then as I do
>>> not and I sent Charles a letter and copied all government heads saying
>>> he would make the perfect stooge for the mayor and others.
>>>
>>> Look at the next few emails, please.
>>>
>>> It was Sally Brooks who wanted me to meet with her and Charles LeBlanc
>>> at the coffee shop last week and I told Sally I did not trust him.
>>> She said he has ADHD and is harmless and that when he was in court he
>>> could hardly talk.  I told her that this did not compute in my mind,
>>> because he can stand in front of the police station on another day and
>>> blurt the hell out of himself yelling things at the police and writing
>>> all this stuff on the blog.  Sally said just come and see.  That
>>> morning, Charles LeBlanc could hardly look me in the fact and I told
>>> Sally that and she said she noticed but she felt it was nothing.  In
>>> fact, I gave him $10 for coffee and he took our picture and put it on
>>> the blog.  Howevr, he wanted to only put things on the blog which was
>>> really Sally and My blog but he wanted to control what went in and
>>> out.  For ex. he did not want to print anything about the letter I
>>> wrote the Police Commission and I copied other people, including David
>>> Amos who to this date, I have not yet met.  However, David does speak
>>> the truth to my mind.  He may be blunt, but he says it like it is.  I
>>> told Sally I thought Charles and David were friends behind closed
>>> doors, but I have now changed that idea.  For ex. at no time did
>>> Charles LeBlanc ever tell me about Andre Murray's plight with the same
>>> police officer who beat me, Cst. Nancy Rideout nor did he mention any
>>> of the facts, but knew my story.  I just recently learned of Andre
>>> Murray and the common denomination we have in common:  "police abuse".
>>>
>>> Please read the next few emails and see what you think.  Then on
>>> Friday, Sally said she met with Charles at his house and she was late
>>> to meet me for lunch.  She did not mention that they were walking on
>>> the street as has been written on our blog.  However, Sally told me to
>>> just let Charles do the whole process of the blog and not send
>>> anything to him but brief comments as Charles is not well enough to
>>> understand my topics of police commission willfull blindness.  I said
>>> okay, but she did not say they were together on the streets nor
>>> mention anything like that, just that she was late because of doing
>>> errands.
>>>
>>> Please remember that nothing about my story was ever written in the
>>> Brunswick Newspaper owned by irving and this is the case with Mr.
>>> Andre Murray.  Why?  Why would Jacques Poitras refuse to write
>>> anything and basically threw me out of the CBC a couple weeks ago,
>>> saying I wrote his boss, Hubert Lacroix.  I asked Mr. Lacrois since
>>> that time if Mr. Poitras has any connection with the female crown
>>> prosecutor, Ms. Poitras in Bathurst, N.B.
>>>
>>> Then someone wrote recently that our finance minister, mr. Higgs used
>>> to work for Irvings.
>>>
>>> I have continually asked if Irving or his son, Kenneth, who up and
>>> left the Irvings shortly after my beating took place and went to
>>> Kinross Gold may have anything to do with Ambulance N.B. and the big
>>> contract its partner, Medavie EMS which is a private, for-profit co.
>>> that has common shares and because it is a private co., the
>>> shareholders do not need to be mentioned at corporate records due to
>>> N.B. legislative statute under Private Act and corporations.  For ex.,
>>> Medavie EMS partnered with NB EMS and that too is partnered with
>>> Ambulance N.B.  They won a lucrative bid for sending a fleet of
>>> ambulances from Canada to Trinidad for $90 million a year.  Was it in
>>> our newspaper.  I did not see it.  Also, I have shared with many of
>>> you the corporate documents showing irregularities in the letters
>>> patent and the incorporation of Medavie EMS which is signed by a
>>> lawyer in Halifax who is with the law firm, Stewart McKelvey who
>>> represents Ambulance N.B. Inc.  I wrote the Trinidad Government and I
>>> got hold of the paper from Trinidad, the TNT Mirror saying the
>>> Attorney General was concerned about irregularities in the contract
>>> and Medavie EMS had written asking what was the hold up.  I then
>>> forwarded my story about getting beaten up at Ambulance NB Inc. and
>>> there was no investigation albeit I informed the Premier, David Alward
>>> and all other ministers.  It is my understanding too that in order for
>>> a P3 partnership that EMS set up with Ambulance NB it is supposed to
>>> be okayed with the Cabinet.  In fact the Minister has to sign off on
>>> it.  However, it was signed by a different Minister, Jack Keir, on
>>> behalf of Minister Greg Byrne who Mr. Keir said was out of the country
>>> at the time.  I asked the secretaries at Service NB who Jack Keir is
>>> and they did not know, but I later found out and called Mr. Keir.  He
>>> told me he is no longer the minister and did not know what he was
>>> signing, saying he is a North shore, St. John New Bru...

[Message clipped]  View entire message

 

 

https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/status/1549877313566916609

 

 
So I finally have a story about the guy that walks around Ottawa's downtown with a New Brunswick and/or Acadian flag tacked to a two by four. Story: New Brunswick protester centred out by Ottawa police, fined more than $1,000
 
Methinks a lot of folks enjoyed the story about your lawyer buddy and his mindless opinion better N'esy Pas? @premierbhiggs @cbcjones @RogerMelanson @CTVNews @DavidLametti @JustinTrudeau @RCMPNB @globalnews @HuffPost 
 
 
 

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/horizon-board-of-directors-new-brunswick-health-1.6526224 

 

Axed Horizon board member says quick decisions were 'delayed, deferred or refused'

Former CEO calls sudden, public firing 'bad management,''scapegoating.'

Linda Forestell, who had been an elected member of the Horizon Health Network board of directors for 10 years.says the premier's removal of all voting members last Friday came as a total surprise.

"We collaborated in as many ways as we possibly could," said Forestell.

"We tried over and over again to respond with lightning speed to requests from the Department of Health, only to have them stall at that level or be delayed, deferred or refused."

On Friday, after a man died in a Fredericton emergency room while waiting for care, Higgs replaced the minister of health, fired the Horizon CEO, and replaced the 15 voting members of the Horizon and Vitalité boards with a single trustee each.

Higgs said the dissolution of the boards would remove a "bureaucratic stalemate" and make the system more efficient, but he did not explain how. 

"I completely disagree with that," Forestell said Wednesday. 

"Our people, at Horizon, participated in the development of the provincial health plan, we helped craft it, we worked together with the task force, we were implementing it. … We incorporated the recommendations of the provincial health plan into Horizon's strategic plan.

"So no, I don't support that at all."

A public firing

Forestell said she got the news she was being removed from the board through a colleague, who was watching the news conference Higgs called to announce the move. 

The colleague's text said: "I really enjoyed working with you."

"My phone started to ring from fellow board members," Forestell said. "So I called [chair] Jeff McAloon and said, 'What's going on?' He said, 'We've been ... revoked.'

"I don't know why. I really and truly don't ... other than there was that unfortunate death in the ER. at the Chalmers Hospital."

John McGarry, a former board member and Horizon CEO who was fired by Shephard last year, agreed that HIggs's decision does not make sense.

McGarry said he doesn't know "whether it was just a knee-jerk reaction to somebody screaming 'Do something, do anything,' and this was the first thing that came to mind."

Former Horizon Health Network president John McGarry called the sudden, public firing of board members 'bad management.' (CBC)

He wondered why, when other players involved in running the health system are appointed by government, Higgs focused on getting rid of people at the regional health networks.

The switch in cabinet ministers, shuffling cabinet minister Bruce Fitch into Health and Dorothy Shephard into Social Development, was a "lateral move," and the bureaucrats at the top are "being protected," McGarry said.

"It's kind of the easy way out," he said. 

And making the changes out of the blue, without warning to those affected, is "not a sign of good management."

McGarry also said that when he was fired by Shephard, it happened the same way.

"I consider that a drive-by shooting, that's not fair to say those things in a press conference or in public without giving the organization an opportunity to address it," he said.

Forestell said that over the years, the Horizon board made recommendations that were rejected. One was to centralize certain procedures at certain regional hospitals, which, before Friday, seemed to finally be on the way to being implemented for hip and knee surgeries.

Another recommendation the province wouldn't take up called for a greater focus on building nursing homes to free up acute-care beds in hospitals.

During her 10-year term, Forestell saw three governments, four chairs of the boards, and five CEOs. 

"You can see that changes at the top are predictably not necessarily the best result for the delivery of the health-care system or health services in the province," she said.

One person voting more 'nimble' than 15

On Wednesday, the new health minister, Fitch, repeated Higgs's notion that the boards posed bureaucratic barriers to getting things done.

"There seems to be an ability — with less bureaucracy, without big boards — to drill down and make some changes that need to be changed without getting caught up in the bureaucracy," he told Information Morning in the Summer.

Fitch had no specific examples of the bureaucratic tangles he was blaming the boards for.

The board of directors has three non-voting members and 15 voting members. In making this decision, Fitch effectively replaced all 15 people with one trustee, said constitutional lawyer Lyle Skinner. 

                                    Lawyer Lyle Skinner says the Horizon and Vitalité boards of directors still exist, but now they have only one voting member. (Submitted by Lyle Skinner)

This means only one person would be voting about how to advise the health network, what recommendations to make and who the next CEO would be.

"It's always been reported that the board has been dissolved and that's technically incorrect," Skinner said. "It's just that the board, the voting members have ceased to hold office. A board exists that just has a voting member of one person."

The people chosen as trustees for the two health authorities are Gérald Richard for Vitalité and Suzanne Johnston for Horizon. They are also co-chairs of the health plan implementation task force, in charge of figuring out how to implement the province's a health-system overhaul in a timely manner.

Fitch said this change would mean the province can "be nimble, be quick to react using the best practices." 

Board acted with caution, former director says

McGarry said change can happen faster when people are taken out of the system, leaving "a direct line to the premier or the minister."

But he said not having diverse opinions can lead to bad decisions.

Forestell said the Horizon board did not stop trying to make quick decisions, but the directors tried to be cautious too.

"You don't just measure once or measure twice before you cut," she said. "You measure 15 times before you cut."

Skinner said the trustees do have one single vote in deciding what advice and recommendations to give the health authority, but they would still be making decisions with the help of the three non-voting board members who remain.

"There's still the CEO … and the two chairs of the professional and medical advisory committees," he said. "It's not that the trustee is just having a meeting by themselves."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Hadeel Ibrahim is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick based in Saint John. She's been previously awarded for a series on refugee mental health and for her work at a student newspaper, where she served as Editor-in-Chief. She reports in English and Arabic. Email: hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca. Twitter: @HadeelBIbrahim

With files from Information Morning in the Summer and Shift N.B.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

 

 


 

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/12/nurse-practitioners-fear-for-patients.html 

 

Monday, 20 December 2021

Nurse practitioners fear for patients amid clinic closures, redeployment to COVID test sites

 

 https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/04/nurse-practitioners-shocked-by-higgs.html

 

Saturday, 10 April 2021

Nurse practitioners shocked by Higgs government decision to charge for medical tests but CBC et al knows why I certainly am not

 

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/cbc-deleted-many-libelous-comments-this.html 

 

Sunday, 13 December 2020

CBC deleted many libelous comments this morning but not all Hence the Crown will be sued AGAIN

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:09:05 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Billy Blair RE "Police lay rare libel
charge" Methinks somebody should explain this CBC News article to me
real slow N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-

Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>




---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:15:48 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier Rankin. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.

We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/>
or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.

If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
https://811.novascotia.ca<https://811.novascotia.ca/>/ and use the
COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you determine if
you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet access, call 811.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:07:24 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Billy Blair RE "Police lay rare libel charge" Methinks
somebody should explain this CBC News article to me real slow N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Guilbeault, Honorable Steven (PCH)"<hon.steven.guilbeault@canada.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:07:22 +0000
Subject: Accusé de réception / Acknowledgment of Receipt
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Steven Guilbeault, ministre du
Patrimoine canadien.

Veuillez noter qu'en raison des circonstances exceptionnelles liées à
la pandémie COVID-19, le temps de réponse pourrait être plus long.

Soyez assurés que nous répondrons en temps opportun.

*****************************

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Steven Guilbeault, Minister of
Canadian Heritage.

Please note that due to the exceptional circumstances with respect to
the COVID-19 pandemic, response time may be longer.

Rest assured that we will respond in due time.




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 19:07:09 -0400
Subject: YO Billy Blair RE "Police lay rare libel charge" Methinks somebody 

 

N.S. man charged after fake ad posted seeking police decals

Man also posted defamatory comments online under another person's name

 

Haley Ryan· CBC News· Posted: Feb 26, 2021 10:47 AM AT

 

 

 https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/06/nurse-shortage-leads-to-bed-closures.html

 

Saturday, 22 June 2019

Nurse shortage leads to bed closures while province does nothing, says Horizon chair

 

 https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




Methinks political people should quit playing games with other people's lives over language and money N'esy Pas?


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/06/nurse-shortage-leads-to-bed-closures.html





https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/horizon-health-nursing-shortage-1.5184573

Nurse shortage leads to bed closures while province does nothing, says Horizon chair

Saint John Regional Hospital forced to close six beds




94  Comments 
Commenting is now closed for this story. (After much editing)



David Amos
Methinks political people should quit playing games with other people's lives over language and money N'esy Pas?

Mark (Junkman) George   
Reply to @David Amos:
My turn for getting disabled David I *guess* I just don't buy into the narrative the CBC is trying to sell?
 

Cindy Fordyce 
Reply to @Mark (Junkman) George: CBC isn't "trying to sell" anything. They are reporting on what is happening.
 

Ray Bungay
Reply to @Mark (Junkman) George: I had 2 tonight in this story, likely to be 3!
 

Mark (Junkman) George 
Reply to @Cindy Fordyce: Not Exactly.
If you actually read the story it does not say anyplace that Horizon Health is short funded. Meaning the money for those 200 nurses exists within the operating budget, just that Horizon Health can't be bothered to hire them.
It then goes on to blame the government for ending a $7.3 Million a year contract with the universities in 2005 (14 years ago) that the universities did not deliver on. It does not tell us why charges were not laid for fraud.
All in all the story is carefully crafted to make the government look bad.
 

David Amos 
Reply to @Mark (Junkman) George: "My turn for getting disabled David"

Methinks it par for the course when you strike a nerve with the "Powers That Be" N'esy Pas?
 

David Amos 
Reply to @Cindy Fordyce: Nope Go Figure

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
 
 
 
 
 



John O'Brien
The biggest problem by far with both Vitalite and Horizon is that the majority of supervisory positions are filled with total incompetents. The management culture dictates that staff who are struggling- physically, mentally or emotionally - with their job will be promoted to a less demanding (???) supervisory position.So, instead of having supervisory and management positions filled by leaders, those positions are often filled with staff whose only qualification is that are unable to perform their normal duties.So , as a favor, they are given positions where they are "coddled". And the rot goes from the top all the way down,.
 
 
Jake Quinlan
Reply to @John O'Brien: Interesting take, especially about lack of leaders in those positions. You know that leaders generally speak their minds, can't have any of that going on now. Those hiring these leaders may see them as threats, upset the status quo.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lou Bell
Maybe the Universities will get their 8+ million back when they USE THE MONEY FOR NURSE TRAINING LIKE THEY AGREED TO DO BUT DIDN'T !!!!

 
 
 
 
 
 
Fred Dee
geeeee... the Horizon chair was appointed by the LIBERALS... any surprise that he is complaining now? any shortage now has nothing to to with the current government!!

A nurse is a guaranteed job, one of the few medical jobe that only takes 4 years!! The rest have increased to 7 or 8 years,,,, requiring a degree to apply.. with no pay increase!!

We need to double the class sizes... increase tuition by 25-50%, will be able to fill the seats!!

Look at UNB law... increased tuition by 50% for new students... still same number of applicants!!
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Fred Dee: "the Horizon chair was appointed by the LIBERALS."

NOPE
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Fred Dee: "Look at UNB law... increased tuition by 50% for new students... still same number of applicants!!"

Methinks everybody knows the government can always use more lawyers to work as politicians and bureaucrats N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Miles Long
Too many nurse managers and not enough bedside nurses. Start training programs to upgrade LPNs to RNs/ Program to take BA and BScs in a short program to become RNs. Whatever happened to the CEO of Horizon, seems to have disappeared, maybe just media shy?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Miles Long: "Too many nurse managers and not enough bedside nurses"

YUP
 
 
Jake Quinlan
Reply to @Miles Long: Too many ineffective nurse managers?





June Arnott
These politicians making the cuts don’t care because if any of their families need medical attention they can purchase it elsewhere.
We are so screwed. Cancer is HUGE in NB and getting worse. But our elected officials have other plans


 
Mark (Junkman) George
Reply to @June Arnott:

Not once, in the article, did Horizon Health claim they were short funded. In fact, government departments operate on a budget. They are assigned X number of dollars, to spend as they see fit, the claim is they can't hire anybody, not that they are short funded.



David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @June Arnott: "We are so screwed. Cancer is HUGE in NB and getting worse"

Methinks it High Time folks start asking WHY N'esy Pas?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @June Arnott: WOW 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Eric Plexe
Mr. McGarry should address his concerns to Health Minister Ted Flemming who appointed him chair of the Horizon Health Network board in January -
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/horizon-health-chair-john-mcgarry-ceo-1.4992788
 
 
Mark (Junkman) George
Reply to @Eric Plexe:
Do you think? The Health Minister is not in charge of hiring anyone besides his office staff. What do you expect the Health Minister to do? Fire Mr McGarry?
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to @Mark (Junkman) George: "Fire Mr McGarry?"

Methinks the Health Minister should resign immediately afterwards N'esy Pas?

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-health-care-leadership-changes-blaine-higgs-defends-1.6523819 

 

Premier Blaine Higgs defends sweeping changes to health-care leadership

Replacing health minister, firing Horizon CEO, dropping health authority boards reflects sense of urgency

He replaced the health minister, fired the head of the Horizon Health Network and replaced the boards of directors of both Horizon and Vitalité with a single trustee each.

Higgs says his actions demonstrate a suitable sense of urgency for a system in "crisis," which he contends wasn't coming across from those managing the system.

"We're going to always find people that resist change. But the time for changing our system and getting it on a road to improvement is now," he said Monday.

"And sometimes I know the shock and awe thing is difficult, but I think everyone realized that something has to be different."

The shakeup comes after a patient died in the waiting room of the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital's emergency department in Fredericton early Tuesday morning while waiting for care.

Witness John Staples said the man, a senior, had been waiting alone in a wheelchair, in visible discomfort for hours when he appeared to fall asleep. It was only during a routine check of people in the waiting room that a hospital employee realized the man had stopped breathing, he said.

There were 17 ER patients waiting to be admitted that day and the hospital was full, according to Higgs.

Higgs said he believes it's necessary to make public the results of Horizon's review of a patient's death in the waiting room of the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital's emergency department last Tuesday morning while waiting for care. (Joe McDonald/CBC)

"We know hospital occupancy has always been a problem. We've had that before COVID. But are people being released [in] an appropriate [amount of] time? Do we have a flow through the system as needed, so we keep people moving because new people are coming in? All of these things are a process improvement, a flow, a management issue, and that's why I focus so much on that."

Higgs confirmed the results of the ongoing Horizon review of the patient's death will be made public. If he's not satisfied with the results, he will ask for an external review, he has said.

During Friday's news conference, Higgs announced Bruce Fitch replaces Dorothy Shephard as Health minister, while she takes over Social Development; Margaret Melanson replaces Dr. John Dornan as interim president and CEO of Horizon; and the government has appointed Suzanne Johnston and Gerald Richard as trustees for Horizon and Vitalité, respectively, replacing the boards, which included members elected by the public and appointed by government.

He was removing a "bureaucratic stalemate," he had said.

I guess I'm not the first to watch it deteriorate, but I might be the first to act like this in the sense of urgency to make something change.
- Blaine Higgs, premier

Asked Monday about his own role and the role of his office in watching the health-care system deteriorate, Higgs replied: "Well, I guess I'm not the first to watch it deteriorate, but I might be the first to act like this in the sense of urgency to make something change."

Higgs has been in office for four years. He won re-election with a majority government in September 2020 after calling a snap election following two years of leading the province's first minority government since 1920.

His government put more money into the health-care system, "but that wasn't working," he said between frequent sips of water, apologizing for having what he described as "a problem with [a] cold in [his] throat."

"I think I've demonstrated the responsibility to act and make something happen in a timely fashion and taken that accountability."

'Not afraid to try' new way

What if the sweeping leadership changes don't work?

"Well, there's a lot of what-ifs in the world, and I guess we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. Right now, I'm not afraid to act and to carry on to act because our people deserve better. Our employees deserve better. And we all need to ensure that that better happens," Higgs said.

"And I'm not afraid to be measured along the way to see that better is indeed happening. So I guess, you know, you can make that judgment in a few years and decide whether we got traction or whether we didn't. But right now, I'm not afraid to try and try in a new and in a different way."

Call for more resources

The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) in New Brunswick agrees changes are necessary, but contends more workers and better funding are among the things needed.

"We can change whoever we want at the head. If they don't have the resources to do their job and they are told all the time 'do more with less,' our members will continue to be frustrated with their managers and the managers will be frustrated with the government, which don't give them the tools to do their job," said spokesperson Simon Ouellette.

New Brunswick should pull out all the stops to recruit health-care workers, according to CUPE, including offering free education in the field.

CUPE spokesperson Simon Ouellette said financial and human resources are what's needed on the ground to help the New Brunswick health-care system. (Radio-Canada)

"Instead of doing that, we come to do an administrative shuffle and we have just removed a layer of transparency that we had with our health authorities which are now under supervision," said Ouellette.

Higgs said "money isn't going to fix all this."

Health plan will still be implemented this mandate

The leadership changes will allow for swifter changes to a strained system. Having a small, focused group emulates what the government did in the early days of the pandemic, he said. "We had a small group that made decisions … based on facts, and then moved that out across the system."

He still wants his government's health reform plan, announced last November, implemented during the current mandate, he said.

"We've fallen behind on the schedule, but we're going to get caught up because our health plan that we put forward is solid. There will always be tweaks and improvements as we go with any improved process, but we committed to doing it during this mandate."

The need for targets and speed of implementation were part of the health plan, which promised that by the second quarter of 2022-23, the list of New Brunswickers waiting for a doctor would be eliminated and replaced by the New Brunswick Primary Care Network.

An update provided last month showed about 63,000 people are now on the Patient Connect New Brunswick list — 23,000 more than when the plan as announced.

Higgs wants to see more sharing of best practices between the two health networks. He notes Vitalité, for example, just hired about 275 students to help allow staff nurses to take vacation this summer.

He also wants to see better communication and collaboration between individual hospitals. One area he points to is sharing information about ER capacity each day so people can travel to another hospital where waits may be shorter.

In addition, nurses should have the flexibility to trade shifts with each other, family doctors need to work in teams more, and surgeries and emergency care should be offered where waits are shorter, he said.

With files from Information Morning In The Summer and Radio-Canada

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fired-horizon-ceo-john-dornan-covid-19-new-brunswick-memo-masks-1.6523963

 

In staff memo day before he was fired, Horizon CEO urged community masking against COVID

Dr. John Dornan advised staff Thursday of 'escalating' transmission in community and health-care settings

In a memo last Thursday, the day before he was fired in a major health-care leadership shakeup, Dornan advised staff "multiple indicators have demonstrated an increase" in the virus across New Brunswick over the past two weeks.

COVID-19 incidence has jumped from 60 cases per 100,000 to 129, and the provincial PCR test positivity rate has doubled to 20 per cent, according to the memo obtained by CBC News.

Horizon spokesperson Kris McDavid confirmed Monday the memo is authentic.

The number of patients either admitted to a Horizon hospital because of COVID or initially admitted for another reason and later tested positive for the virus has spiked to 104 from 29, the memo indicates.

There are now COVID outbreaks on 15 Horizon hospital units, up from two.

And staff absenteeism due to COVID has increased from an average of 50 to an average of 150, Dornan advised.

"Given these concerning trends, Horizon and Vitalité continue to monitor data and will make an evidence-based decision on our [infection prevention control] alert levels," he wrote, noting similar increases in COVID activity are being seen in other provinces.

"Consider showing an example in our community by wearing masks when indoors, shopping, etc. As part of our larger community, the 14,000 of us can be good examples."

No plans for mandatory masking

Masking has not been required in New Brunswick since March 14, when all COVID-19 restrictions were lifted.

Last week, the province's chief medical officer of health said a return to mandatory masking or other protective restrictions is not being considered.

"At this point … we're not having that conversation," Dr. Jennifer Russell told CBC News.

"The message right now is about vaccination, because that's the thing that's going to decrease people's risk of having severe outcomes and requiring hospitalization."

Dornan urged Horizon's roughly 14,000 staff members to maintain continuous masking in health-care facilities and to consider masking in indoor public spaces in the community as an example to others as COVID-19 transmission increases across the province. (Submitted by AHS)

New Brunswick's decision to focus on COVID-19 vaccination alone in the face of rising COVID cases fuelled by the highly transmissible Omicron subvariants BA.5 and BA.4 is a "bad strategy," according to infection control epidemiologist Colin Furness.

He has predicted it will fail and put children under five, who are currently unvaccinated, at greater risk.

Department of Health officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday about whether the province's position on masking has changed.

Officials also did not immediately respond to questions about what, if any role Dornan's memo played in his ousting Friday.

Dornan, who was only appointed president and CEO in March, after serving in the role in an interim capacity for about seven months, declined to comment.

Provinces need to acknowledge COVID-19 is airborne and educate people about using respirator masks, infection control epidemiologist Colin Furness has said. (Nicholas Pfosi/Reuters)

Premier Blaine Higgs announced Dornan was fired, Dorothy Shephard was dropped as Health minister and the boards of both Horizon and Vitalité were removed, citing a growing health-care crisis that included the "traumatizing" death of a patient Tuesday in a Fredericton emergency department waiting room.

Margaret Melanson, Horizon's vice-president clinical services, will serve as Dornan's interim replacement.

Bruce Fitch has been named health minister and Shephard takes over as the minister of social development.

In place of the boards of directors for the two health authorities, Higgs said his government has appointed Suzanne Johnston and Gerald Richard as trustees for Horizon and Vitalité, respectively.

In addition to masking in public, Dornan asked staff in the memo to maintain continuous masking in Horizon facilities and to practise good hand hygiene.

They should also continue to follow infection prevention and control guidance, particularly physical distancing and occupancy limits in lunchrooms, he said, "as risk of transmission is significantly increased when your mask is removed while eating or drinking."

If staff have a community or occupational exposure to COVID, they should use on-site testing clinics, Dornan said.

If they have "ANY" symptoms of the virus, he stressed in capital letters, they should get tested.

Dornan thanked staff for their "ongoing diligence and support" in the pandemic response.

"Please stay safe and take time to recharge," he concluded.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

Impatient Blaine Higgs drops health minister, Horizon CEO

Bruce Fitch becomes health minister, Dorothy Shephard moves to Social Development

Death in N.B ER waiting room highlights health-care crisis, premier says

3 days ago
Duration 1:49
New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs fired the province’s health minister and the CEO of a major health network after a man died in an ER waiting room, which he says highlights a wider health-care crisis in Canada.

 Premier Blaine Higgs dropped his health minister Friday and fired the CEO of one of two New Brunswick health networks after worsening news on the health-care front that included a "traumatizing" death in an emergency department's waiting room.

Bruce Fitch is now health minister, switching places with Dorothy Shephard, who moves from Health to Social Development, Higgs announced, during a Friday afternoon news conference.

Higgs also announced Horizon Health Network CEO John Dornan was fired from his role, and replaced on an interim basis by Margaret Melanson, the network's vice-president clinical services.

In addition, Higgs said he revoked the boards of both Horizon and Vitalité health networks and installed in their place a trustee for each.

WATCH | 'It starts at the top:' Higgs details changes to health-care leadership

Higgs says he was ‘appalled’ to hear of death in ER waiting room

3 days ago
Duration 3:33
The premier announced Friday he was firing the CEO of Horizon and replacing his health minister.

"We have a plan," Higgs said. "It needs to be implemented. The situation we're in today is the result of many, many years of successive governments refusing to deal with urgent situations."

The shakeup of New Brunswick's health-care leadership comes after a patient died in the waiting room of the Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital's emergency department early Tuesday morning while waiting for care.

Witness John Staples said the man, a senior, had been waiting alone in a wheelchair, in visible discomfort for hours when he appeared to fall asleep. It was only during a routine check of people in the waiting room that a hospital employee realized the man had stopped breathing, he said.

Investigation ordered into death

Higgs said he was "appalled" when he heard a patient died while waiting to be seen in an emergency department.

He said he's asked Horizon Health Network to undertake an investigation into what happened, and that if he's not satisfied with the results, will ask for an external review.

Premier Blaine Higgs said the death of a patient in a Fredericton waiting room this week was traumatizing for the ER, the family and people who witnessed it. (Pat Richard/CBC)

"I have no doubt that every New Brunswicker is saddened and concerned by this story. We all want to know that if we go to the hospital we will receive help we need."

Answering questions from reporters, Higgs said his hope is the investigation uncovers whether any standards for care at the hospital were not being met when the patient died in the waiting room.

However, he was quick to note he doesn't believe fault lies with frontline health-care workers.

"I don't believe this has anything to do with — and I'm just stating an opinion here — anything to do with the nurses on shift or the people on shift.

"I believe it's a management issue. I believe there's no co-ordination of activity and that's what I'm trying to drive home here. If we don't get better management results in our hospitals, we won't get better health care."

Switching ministers

Higgs praised Shephard's work during the pandemic, and for her role in putting forward a new health-care plan for the province.

However, he said, Fitch would take a "fresh look" at how the department measures performance and where the shortcomings lie in health care.

Dorothy Shephard was shuffled from being minister of health to minister of social development, while Bruce Fitch was moved from social development to the role of health minister. (CBC)

"In the case of Bruce joining, sometimes a change is, some may say, better than a rest," Higgs said.

"Bruce is a seasoned individual within the government … he'll work with people anywhere, as Dorothy was, but bringing in a fresh look at, OK, how do we measure performance? How do we deliver on results? Where have we not provided and followed through on commitments made and what were the root causes of that?"

Revoking health authority boards

In place of the boards of directors for the two health authorities, Higgs said his government has appointed trustees Suzanne Johnston and Gerald Richard for Horizon and Vitalité, respectively.

"We are fortunate to have two outstanding and experienced individuals to come out of retirement to help guide us through these challenging times.

The boards of the health networks include members elected by the public and members appointed by government.

Higgs said the two boards were revoked to make quicker changes at the two health authorities.

"We're taking a crisis management approach here to allow decisions to be made, to allow direct consultation with appropriate people and get on with it.

"So we're removing this situation of a bureaucratic stalemate … and this isn't intended to be permanent but this is intended to get results. And right now I need to see results, and I want to remove the barriers and roadblocks for our health professionals to achieve them."

Higgs said he didn't have a timeline for when he expects results from the two trustees and was vague on what their targets were.

"There's going to be some targets we'll be setting out there that we want to achieve first. So I can't put a timeline on it but I do want to be clear on what the outcomes need to be."

'Major step backwards,' says ousted Horizon chair

Higgs's announcement was met with swift criticism from Jeff McAloon, the Horizon board chair until Friday. 

"I am disappointed and disheartened by Premier Higgs's unilateral decision to remove Dr. John Dornan as CEO of Horizon Health Network," McAloon said in an email statement.

"I believe in Dr. Dornan's experience and ability to affect real and positive change in the provincial health system."

During the news conference, Higgs sidestepped a question about what it was Dornan failed to do in his role as CEO.

"I think what I'm demonstrating here is a need to get a groundswell in relation to frontline workers in the case of Margaret Melanson and her role in clinical services and you know, how we can direct that in the hospitals," he said.

"I think in every hospital there needs to be a manager of clinical services that is really that gatekeeper of who is coming in? Who is going out? What's the time in? How quickly are we managing that? And we need to get on the ground with that.

   Dr. John Dornan was fired as CEO of Horizon Health Network after being officially named to the position only four months ago. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

McAloon characterized Higgs's move as a centralization of health-care control.

"To me, and to the partially elected, local board I led, today's announcement is a major step backward," he said. 

"It represents the loss of community ownership and engagement and clinical, leadership expertise.

"Centralizing control within the Premier's Office is not the answer. Politics is what got us here and is not the solution."

McAloon said he had not heard from Higgs and only learned of his decision moments before the news conference began.

"I join with all New Brunswickers in their feelings of shock and want nothing more than to see our system stabilized."

Johanne Lise Landry, spokesperson for Vitalité Health Network, said in an email that the health network did not receive any correspondence about its board being revoked.

There was also reaction from the medical community itself.

"Firing Dr. John Dornan would have to rank as one of the ill-advised, mindless and ill-considered decisions I have ever heard," tweeted cardiologist Dr. Robert Teskey. 

Opposition reaction

Interim Liberal Leader Roger Melanson wondered why it's taking so long for Higgs to do something about problems in the health–care system.

He said the premier has been in office for four years, and he needs to explain to New Brunswickers what his new plan is and why he thinks it will work.

But Melanson is concerned that attracting new doctors won't be high on the agenda for the province.

"We need health-care workers to be able to deliver these services, and they still have not even mentioned that today in this press conference," said Melanson.

Green Party health critic Megan Mitton said successive governments of Liberal and PC stripes have contributed to the state of the province's health-care system.

She's concerned about the abandonment of partially elected health boards, a move she said goes against democracy.

"We should not be seeing more centralization of our health-care system," said Mitton. "We should be going in the other direction and having more decision-making and power and resources at the local level."

Melanson said he would like to see the legislature recalled to deal with this issue, something Mitton said she would support.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Aidan Cox

Web reporter/editor

Aidan Cox is a web writer for the CBC based in Fredericton. He can be reached at aidan.cox@cbc.ca and followed on Twitter @Aidan4jrn.

-With files from Karissa Donkin, Shift and Jordan Gill

 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/horizon-president-ceo-john-dornan-1.6373553

 

Dr. John Dornan named Horizon's new president and CEO

Dornan, who has served in interim capacity since August, is 'excellent choice,' says board chair

Dornan, a former regional chief of staff and department head at the Saint John Regional Hospital, has served in the role in an interim capacity since last August, when Karen McGrath stepped down

During that time, Horizon has had to deal with the highest number of COVID-19-related hospitalizations of the pandemic and a significant number of staff off work because of isolation rules. 

"Dr. Dornan has 35 years of experience in the provincial health-care system, having held several positions in leadership, educational and front-line activities," Health Minister Dorothy Shephard said in a statement Friday, announcing his appointment.

"His skills, abilities and competencies will ensure the Horizon Health Network will continue to deliver high-quality health-care services to residents."

Horizon's board said it looks forward to working with Dornan and believes his "experience, knowledge and collaborative nature" are what the regional health authority needs to "lead the transformative change required to improve health-care services and attract health-care workers."

Upon being named interim president and CEO, Dornan immediately began to tackle the challenges facing Horizon, such as wait times in the emergency department and the recruitment and retention of health-care staff, the board said in a statement.

"As a physician who has worked across the province and having held several senior administrative and medical leadership positions, Dr. Dornan is uniquely skilled to lead the transformational changes that are required to improve our health care system," said board president Jeff McAloon.

Dornan has a master's degree in business administration and holds Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada fellowships in internal medicine, and endocrinology and metabolism.

He has practised medicine in New Brunswick since 1987 and played a principal role in the establishment of Dalhousie University's first New Brunswick-based satellite Royal College residency.

McAloon described him as "an excellent choice."

Dornan was selected following an open and transparent national search, according to the health minister. Last fall the Department of Health used an executive search firm to help find a new CEO for Horizon.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

13 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story
 

Brian Robertson
Dornan is a good man and can bring positive changes to Horizon Healthcare provided the Government keeps their fingers out of it.
 
 
Laura Smith
Great choice ! Should have happened years ago - someone finally is qualified for this role. Politics got in the way then.
 
 
 
Raymond Leger
Remember the days when Provincial governments would brag about creating more jobs rather than making more welfare?
 
 
Lou Bell
Reply to @Raymond Leger: Sure , it was fake news , but yeah , I remember those days . McKinnon gave us fake news many times !
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Michael Cain
Is he going to donate his salary to improving our health care system? good man!
Robin Ellison
Reply to @Michael Cain: Why do you assume he is a wealthy man? Physicians are well compensated, no question, but the salaries they receive that are published in the media do not take into account significant medical school debt, truncated careers (most physicians do not start practicing until their early thirties due to medical education taking 13-15 years), practice overhead (physicians are small businessmen, not government employees), lack of benefits and absence of a pension plan. I'm sure
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to @Robin Ellison: geez, nobody has a sense of humour nowadays
 
 
Lou Bell
Reply to @Michael Cain: Are you ?
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to @Lou Bell: hardly afford a roof over my head, thanks to your buddy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
JOHN NOWLAN
This appears to be a press release disguised as a news article. The Board is essentially congratulating themselves on the person they hired.
The jury is out on how well Horizon handled Covid; from the little information released to the public, it appeared that many people caught Covid AFTER they were admitted. Which calls into question the protocols used. I know for a fact that midway through the pandemic Horizon started handing out easily ripped paper masks to visitors and patients. On the face of it, that seemed to be an attempt to save money at the risk of spreading the virus.
And is someone who has spent 35 years with an organization really the best person to lead that organization to "transformational" change. It is more likely that he thinks the organization is doing more or less a good job and minor tinkering is all that is required.
I do not know this person, I am sure he is a fine fellow. But health care and other services in NB are in desperate need of fresh thinking, and, well, transformational change.
 
 
Lou Bell
Reply to @JOHN NOWLAN: Been in there many times . Masks were od good quality and never ripped . They're supposed to be used to cover nose and mouth you know . 
 
 
JOHN NOWLAN
Reply to @Lou Bell: Factually incorrect (par for the course for you). Horizon switched to paper last year.

 

 

https://horizonnb.ca/bios/jeff-mcaloon/ 

 

Jeff McAloon

Board Chair
Chair - Executive Committee

Currently working as an executive in the renewable energy sector, Jeff has held leadership roles in the for-profit and not-for-profit sectors and remains heavily involved in his community.

During his eight-year term as the President & CEO of the Saint John Regional Hospital Foundation, Jeff was responsible for leading fundraising initiatives that resulted in over $75 million raised for projects advancing health care in New Brunswick.

He is a graduate of Mount Allison University and Ryerson University.

Jeff has extensive experience as a Board Director, having served as Vice Chair of the Saint John Police Commission, Chair of the Saint John Parking and Transit Commission, Vice Chair of the Imperial Theatre, Chair of Touchstone Academy and the inaugural Chair of Connection Dance Works. It is through his work and volunteer experience that Jeff has developed a strong penchant for strategic planning, governance and team building.

 

https://huddle.today/2021/04/14/jeff-mcaloon-resigning-as-ceo-of-saint-john-regional-hospital-foundation/

 

Jeff-McAloon
Home» Jeff McAloon Resigning As CEO Of Saint John Regional Hospital Foundation

Jeff McAloon Resigning As CEO Of Saint John Regional Hospital Foundation

SAINT JOHN – The CEO of the Saint John Regional Hospital Foundation is moving on to the next chapter of his career.

Foundation officials announced Wednesday that Jeff McAloon is leaving the role effective July 1.

McAloon said after eight years as the foundation’s president and CEO, he feels now is the time for new leadership.

“I’m a believer that change in leadership is a really important thing, but the timing of that change is also critical,” McAloon said in a phone interview.

“The fact that we have finished one campaign, we have not launched another large campaign yet, that to me is the perfect time for leadership transition.”

During his tenure, McAloon has led the $12-million capital campaign for the Clinic 1 expansion project, which reached its fundraising goal in late March.

The expansion will increase the square footage of the clinic from 7,000 to 14,700 square feet, improving accessibility, privacy and patient comfort and care.

Clinic 1 serves more than 40,000 patients from across Atlantic Canada every year — a number that is expected to reach 46,000 in the next five years.

McAloon said there are “so many” highlights from his time with the foundation, but the biggest is the generosity he has witnessed from Saint Johners and New Brunswickers.

“I’ve always known that Saint John and New Brunswickers are incredibly generous, but I’ve got to experience first-hand,” he said. “The hundreds and hundreds of people that I’ve met who’ve shared their stories, who’ve shared their gifts of either encouragement or donations, it’s incredible.”

McAloon said he will be moving into an entrepreneurial role in the private sector, with more details to come in the near future.

In the meantime, an interim special committee of active board members, including chair Jamie Gallagher and vice-chair Derek Dobson, will act as transitional support for the foundation over the coming months.

The special committee will bring in an external recruitment firm and launch a comprehensive national search for McAloon’s replacement this month.

“We’re in a perfect position to do a really effective and smooth leadership transition,” said McAloon.

Gallagher thanked McAloon on behalf of the board of directors for his dedication and passion for the foundation.

“I have greatly enjoyed working with him, and I know my fellow Board members, management and staff have shared that experience,” Gallagher wrote in a news release. “We will miss Jeff, but he leaves the Foundation in a strong position for the future.”

Brad Perry is the news director with 97.3 The Wave/Country 94, Huddle content partners.

 he Smart Energy Company™ Announces New Addition to Leadership Team
The Smart Energy Company™, New Brunswick’s leading commercial solar developer, is
pleased to announce the appointment of Jeff McAloon as its new Chief Revenue Officer
effective July 1st, 2021. McAloon has led cross-sectoral operational growth for more than
20-years.
McAloon will be responsible for new revenue development including the export of the
NOREASTER® Solar Farm product line - a first-of-its-kind, modularized and packaged solar
energy solution proven to withstand the harsh climate of Atlantic Canada. Worldwide demand
for commercial-grade solar packages for farmers, businesses, municipalities and utilities is
growing exponentially.
“The solar industry is poised for historic growth, but it takes strong leadership to effectively
capitalize on opportunities like this,” said Chief Executive Officer, Mark McAloon. “Jeff has a
long history of building highly efficient and effective teams along with successfully growing new
lines of business in a variety of industries. I’m proud to be working alongside my brother while
enabling our complementary skill sets to strengthen the growth of our organization. We are
absolutely thrilled he is joining our team.”
About The Smart Energy Company™: The Smart Energy Company™ is New Brunswick’s
leading commercial solar developer, whose projects to date account for close to half of all
grid-tied solar installations in New Brunswick. More information about the NOREASTER® and
the Smart Energy Company™ and can be found at https://thesmartenergycompany.ca.
For more information:
Sarah Barrie
Chief Operating Officer
sarah@smart-energy.ca
506-849-3001

 

https://onbcanada.ca/smart-energy-company-new-brunswick/ 

 

The Smart Energy Company: Driving Energy Innovation in New Brunswick

The Smart Energy Company is urgently hiring Electrical Labourers to complete the site work for the Shediac solar farm! Full-time and contract work is available. See all details here.

Founded in 2016, Quispamsis-based The Smart Energy Company (TSEC) is helping Atlantic Canada’s businesses create pathways to a carbon-neutral future through innovative renewable energy solutions.

In June, NB Power announced it had selected TSEC to help with the building of a new 1.63 megawatt (MW) solar farm in Shediac, New Brunswick. “The solar farm is the first of its kind in the province and an important part of the larger Smart Grid Atlantic smart and renewable energy research program being run by NB Power, Siemens Canada, and Nova Scotia Power,” noted the utility in a press release.

“We are thrilled to have NB Power recognize our solution, the NOREASTER®, as the perfect fit for this project,” notes Jeff McAloon Chief Revenue Officer. “It’s a made-in-New Brunswick solution specifically designed to deal with the harsh Canadian climate. We think it’s fantastic that NB Power is eager to support a local startup like ours offering a solution designed, engineered, and manufactured right here in New Brunswick.”

Energy Innovation in New Brunswick

McAloon says it’s impossible to overstate how important the Shediac project is for the company. “We’ve been at this for five years, and we’ve already done about 50 per cent of the commercial solar projects in the province. We’re still a young company, however, so from a credibility standpoint this is tremendous. After five years of research and development, to have a major player like NB Power recognize our solution is truly a watershed moment for us.”

He says projects of this scale also help demonstrate to the rest of the country and beyond that New Brunswick is fully embracing innovative energy solutions. “Solar has been around a long time, and Atlantic Canada has not been as quick to fully adopt it as other regions. Having the province’s primary utility show that they see a future in it, so much so that they will invest in it with projects like the Shediac farm, sends a powerful message. That message is that yes, solar is viable, proven, and can succeed in Atlantic Canada. And we can build it here too.”

Looking to the Future

McAloon says TSEC now has support outside the province and is excited about exporting their solutions beyond New Brunswick. “We have interest now from Export Development Canada (EDC), which see this as a showcase project for other large-scale utilities, and a chance us to export our product to other provinces, the US, and abroad. It’s purpose-built to stand up to climates around the world, places that are susceptible to high winds, fog, and harsh winter conditions.”

He says myths remain about solar energy and its efficacy, but projects like the Shediac Community Solar Farm, and their growing list of other solar energy projects, can and are busting those myths. “I think more and more, the public is recognizing that solar works, and it’s great to see both NB Power and the province of New Brunswick embracing it.”

To learn about The Smart Energy Company’s NOREASTER®, as well as their clean energy storage and electric vehicle charging solutions visit https://thesmartenergycompany.ca/.

Looking to make your own connection to a provincial organization like NB Power? The New Brunswick First Procurement Strategy is a procurement strategy that ensures that goods, services, and construction services required by the government are procured from New Brunswick suppliers wherever possible while respecting trade agreements. Learn more here.

 

 https://thesmartenergycompany.ca/our-team

 

 

 

https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/health/news/news_release.2022.06.0332.html 

 

Task force co-chairs provide update on health plan implementation

FREDERICTON (GNB) – The co-chairs of the provincial government’s health plan implementation task force say they are seeing a vibrant passion for community health care and an encouraging desire for partnership in finding solutions.

Suzanne Johnston and Gérald Richard were appointed last fall to ensure implementation of the actions in the government’s health plan, Stabilizing Health Care: An Urgent Call to Action. They provided an update today after meeting with more than 40 individuals and community and organizational leaders to discuss the plan and its five action areas. New Brunswickers will be able to follow progress on the plan’s implementation on a new website launching this week.

Johnston and Richard said there is an openness to how people conceptualize health care in the communities they have visited, and that they were impressed with areas of the province where best practices are already being followed, with physicians and other health professionals working together through different models to provide a full range of primary care and community health services.

“We are hearing how clinicians working in collaborative teams find greater job satisfaction, and patients have told us ‘a team working together to help me stay healthy – that works for me,’” said Johnston. “Lifting the learnings from these areas allow us to move more quickly and inform solutions in other communities.”

Richard said there is strength in not taking a cookie-cutter approach to address the needs of individual communities.

“It is in the conversations around the table, in the communities, where we learn what works best for that community, and it is our role to take that information back to the health-care providers and have those conversations,” said Richard.

An example of community-led innovations is a project known as Nursing Homes Without Walls. It is led by a researcher at the Université de Moncton, supported by the Department of Social Development, and being piloted in six communities.

“There has been a 63 per cent drop in emergency room visits for people in Port Elgin enrolled in the Nursing Homes Without Walls program,” said Richard. “These are the success stories we need to share and learn from.”

Johnston said there is recognition across the province that everybody does not expect every service to be available everywhere; however, there is a reasonable expectation that people have access to a connected system of care, whether through new technology or a more co-ordinated approach among providers. She said this shift in attitudes bodes well for a successful evolution of New Brunswick’s health-care system.

“Health happens in communities,” said Johnston. “We have the opportunity to work together in advancing health-care delivery models in New Brunswick.”

Since the launch of the health plan last November:

  • eVisitNB virtual care is now available at no charge for people with a medicare card.
  • There have been enhancements to Tele-Care 811 referral services, including arranging a consultation with a doctor or nurse practitioner, either in person or over the phone.
  • Pharmacists can now renew many prescriptions, including those for shingles and birth control, without patients needing to visit a primary care provider.
  • Pharmacist fees for shingles and birth control management are now among those paid for by the government.
  • With respect to emergency care and 911 calls, paramedics are to use clinical judgement to find the most appropriate community care option.
  • With respect to addiction and mental health services, one-at-a-time therapy has been introduced and Bridge the gApp use has increased by 20 per cent. Bridge the gApp is an online access point for services related to substance abuse and mental health.
  • Four communities have been identified as sites for integrated community care: Dalhousie, Sussex, Fredericton and Charlotte County. Recruitment is underway for community developers and nurse practitioners in these communities, and community advisory committees are being established.
  • Family doctors and surgeons in the Fredericton and Bathurst regions are being trained to use a new e-referral program to improve patient access to surgery.
  • The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery program has been launched for colorectal surgery patients at the Dr. Georges-L.-Dumont University Hospital Centre. Preparations are underway to launch the program for colorectal surgery patients at the Moncton Hospital and for and hip and knee replacement surgery patients in Saint John. This program was first piloted at the Chaleur Regional Hospital and is shortening hospital stays and reducing surgical complications.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2021 20:51:13 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn NORMAN J. BOSSÉ Q.C. RE My right to Health Care I
got a call yesterday at about 4 PM from private number claiming to
speak for YOU True or False??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>


https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/health/news/news_release.2021.11.0820.html 

 

Health plan implementation task force, co-chairs announced

FREDERICTON (GNB) – The provincial government announced today that it is establishing a health plan implementation task force to be co-chaired by Gérald Richard and Suzanne Johnston to help guide the objectives in the new provincial health plan.

“We need to take swift action to stabilize our health-care system,” said Health Minister Dorothy Shephard. “One of the overarching themes in our new health-care plan is collaboration amongst all of our partners in the system. This task force will ensure we have a co-ordinated and consistent approach in achieving our goals.”

The task force will be independent of government. Its role will be to make recommendations to the ministers of Health and Social Development.

The group will be authorized to call upon the expertise of health professionals, academics and other experts as needed.

Gérald Richard is a former deputy minister in the Department of Health. Prior to joining that department in 2019, he had served as a deputy minister for the Department of Education and Early Childhood Development since 2013. He has held several positions in the education system, at the school and district levels, and became assistant deputy minister of Education and Early Childhood Development in January 2011.

“Our responsibility is to ensure the implementation of this plan is truly citizen-centred,” said Richard.

Suzanne Johnston served as the president of Niagara Health in Ontario from 2014 to 2019. She has more than 30 years of leadership experience in health care and government. Prior to joining Niagara Health, she was the vice-president of clinical programs and chief nursing officer for Northern Health in British Columbia. She obtained both her undergraduate and graduate degrees in nursing from the University of New Brunswick and completed her doctoral studies at the University of Arizona.

“This is an opportunity to make a difference for New Brunswickers,” said Johnston. “I feel we owe it to our front-line staff, including our nurses, to demonstrate that we are committed to a culture of respect, caring and kindness.”

This week, the provincial government will release its new health plan, Stabilizing Health Care: An Urgent Call to Action. The plan will outline a path forward, intended to stabilize and rebuild New Brunswick’s health-care system to be more citizen-focused, efficient, accountable, inclusive and service-oriented.

Media Contact(s)

Bruce Macfarlane, communications, Department of Health, bruce.macfarlane@gnb.ca.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 02:23:46 -0300
Subject: Fwd: At least your lawyer Tim Ross can never deny that I am
still alive despite the fact I have been denied Heath Care since 2008
when a doctor directed 3 members of the RCMP and two hospital security
guards to assault me CORRECT?
To: mike@valentlegal.ca, erika.hachey@mosshacheylaw.com,
andrew.moss@mosshacheylaw.com, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca,
Brigitte.Sonier-Ferguson@vitalitenb.ca, ethique.ethics@vitalitenb.ca,
"thomas.lizotte"<thomas.lizotte@vitalitenb.ca>,
Stephanie.Thebeau@vitalitenb.ca, MelanieDawn.Cameron@horizonnb.ca,
info@vitalitenb.ca, benoit.bourque@gnb.ca,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, tom.fetter@gnb.ca,
dave.dell@gnb.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca, "chuck.chiasson"
<chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, MichelleAnne.Duguay@gnb.ca,
Jason.Sully@gnb.ca, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
Jennifer.Russell@gnb.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "geoff.regan"
<geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "ian.fahie"<ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, DND_MND@forces.gc.ca,
"pierre.poilievre"<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "Candice.Bergen"
<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, Nick.Brown@gnb.ca,
Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca, Adam.Bowie@gnb.ca, "Alex.Vass"
<Alex.Vass@gnb.ca>, info@easterncms.com, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, DH.MS.Medicare@gnb.ca,
President@nbms.nb.ca, aknight@nbms.nb.ca, tross@nbms.nb.ca,
rcampbell@nbms.nb.ca, llepage@nbms.nb.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ryan Campbell <rcampbell@nbms.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 02:55:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: CBC makes a splash about Brody McGee's
health care issues and his troubles go away fast So much for ethics EH
Higgy??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I am currently away from the office until Tuesday, July 12, 2022.  If
this is urgent please contact John Maher at jmaher@nbms.nb.ca.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/university-of-new-brunswick-manoj-bhargava-class-action-lawsuit-1.6513513


14 people come forward in lawsuit against UNB, psychiatrist accused of
sexual assault


One victim wants to be representative for students allegedly sexually
assaulted by psychiatrist
Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Jul 07, 2022 4:52 PM AT


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 12:06:21 -0300
 Subject: Fwd: Re The coverup of the the actions of the Fredericton
 Police Force, the RCMP and Manoj Bhargava against me
 To: mike@valentlegal.ca
 Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

https://valentlegal.ca/class-action/university-new-brunswick-class-action/

 University New Brunswick Class Action
 Overview

 Valent Legal has commenced a class action lawsuit against the
 University of New Brunswick and Dr. Manoj Bhargava on behalf of a
 group of students who accessed mental health services through the UNB
 Student Health Centre and allege to have been subjected to sexual
 assault perpetrated by Dr. Bhargava.

 The Class Action alleges the University of New Brunswick, and its
 employees, were negligent by failing to properly protect the students
 accessing their health care services. The Class Action further alleges
 Dr. Bhargava was medically negligent by subjecting the student class
 members to sexual assault.

 Valent Legal is working on this Class Action in collaboration with New
 Brunswick law firm, Moss Hachey Law. To speak with a representative
 from Moss Hachey Law, please contact Erika Baker at 506-449-7544.
 Documents

 Notice of Action


 ---------- Original message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 09:06:58 -0300
 Subject: Re The coverup of the the actions of the Fredericton Police
 Force, the RCMP and Manoj Bhargava against me
 To: erika.hachey@mosshacheylaw.com, andrew.moss@mosshacheylaw.com
 Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

 Erika R. Hachey
 Called to the bar: 2013 (NB)
erika.hachey@mosshacheylaw.com,
 Andrew C.W. Moss
 Called to the bar: 2015 (NB)
 Email: andrew.moss@mosshacheylaw.com
 Moss Hachey Law
 90 Woodside Lane, Suite 103
 Fredericton, New Brunswick E3C 2R9
 Phone: 506-449-7544
 Fax: 506-300-2072


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/university-of-new-brunswick-sexual-assault-manoj-bhargava-1.5983964

 "Referring complaints to police

 Schollenberg said the college involved the police recently, after
 suspending Bhargava.

 "It became apparent that there may be more to this," he said.

 He said the college asked some of the 18 complainants if they were
 interested in speaking to the police and passed on their information
 to the Fredericton Police Force if they said yes.

     Fredericton psychiatrist suspended by College of Physicians and Surgeons

 Alycia Bartlette, spokesperson for the Fredericton Police Force, would
 not confirm whether the police are investigating Bhargava.

 "In general, we would not confirm whether a specific individual was
 the subject of a police investigation until such time as charges are
 laid in court, or there are operational reasons otherwise," she said
 in an email."

 >>> From: "Ross, Ken (DH/MS)"<ken.ross@gnb.ca>
  >>> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:43:31 -0300
  >>> Subject: Re: Hey Ken Who is Mental Health's and the Hospital in
  >>> Fredericton's lawyers?
  >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
  >>>
  >>> Got your messages Dave. I am in Toronto for meetings and will be back
  >>> in the office Friday. I will ask Barb Whitenect to follow up with you
  >>> in the interim. Yes Herby picked up ypur bike a while back.
  >>>
  >>> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> --- On Wed, 7/9/08, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
  >>>
  >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
  >>> Subject: Hey Ken Who is Mental Health's and the Hospital in
  >>> Fredericton's lawyers?
  >>> To: ken.ross@gnb.ca, Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
  >>> Cc: rosaire.santerre@gnb.ca, Marc.Pitre@gnb.ca, David.Eidt@gnb.ca,
  >>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, Judy.Cyr@gnb.ca, t.j.burke@gnb.ca,
  >>> police@fredericton.ca, Carrie.Levesque@gnb.ca, anne.elgee@gnb.ca,
  >>> danny.copp@fredericton.ca, jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
  >>> Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2008, 3:03 AM
  >>>
  >>> KENNETH ROSS, Assistant Deputy Minister
  >>> Addictions and Mental Health Services / Health
  >>> Contact Information
  >>> Phone: (506) 457-4800
  >>> Fax: (506) 453-5243
  >>>
  >>> BARBARA WHITENECT, Director
  >>> Addictions and Mental Health Services / Health
  >>> Contact Information
  >>> Phone: (506) 444-4442
  >>> Fax: (506) 453-8711
  >>> EMail Address: Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> Sorry to involve you but lets just say that I am really really pissed
  >>> off for very justifiable reasons.
  >>>
  >>> This should prove to some folks that at least I know how to read.
  >>>
  >>> http://www.ahsc.health.nb.ca/Programs/MentalHealth/rights.shtml
  >>>
  >>> I have no doubt whatsoever that you would more pissed than I am if
  >>> the malicious bullshit that happened to me last weekend had happened
  >>> to you.
  >>>
  >>> I will try to call you in business hours but I suspect in the end I
  >>> will wind up arguing this dude in court in short order. (On a lighter
  >>> note did Herby pick up my bike?)
  >>>
  >>> David Eidt
  >>> Legal Services
  >>> Office of the Attorney General
  >>> Tel: (506) 453-3964
  >>> Fax: (506) 453-3275
  >>> david.eidt@gnb.ca
  >>>
  >>> Best Regards
  >>> Dave
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> These emails and the bullshit from the news last year should to all
  >>> that I am as serious as a heart attack and far from mentally unstabe
  >>> but the cops have proven themselves to be monumental liars many times
  >>>
  >>> Subject:
  >>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
  >>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
  >>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> January 30, 2007
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  >>>
  >>> Mr. David Amos
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> Dear Mr. Amos:
  >>>
  >>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
  >>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
  >>>
  >>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
  >>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
  >>> Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.
  >>>
  >>> Sincerely,
  >>>
  >>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
  >>> Minister of Health
  >>>
  >>> CM/cb
  >>>
  >>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
  >>>
  >>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
  >>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
  >>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
  >>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
  >>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
  >>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
  >>> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
  >>> "Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
  >>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
  >>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
  >>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
  >>>
  >>> Dear Mr. Amos,
  >>>
  >>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
  >>> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
  >>> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
  >>>
  >>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
  >>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
  >>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
  >>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
  >>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
  >>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
  >>>
  >>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
  >>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
  >>> Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
  >>> US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
  >>> Petitcodiac, NB.
  >>>
  >>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
  >>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
  >>>
  >>> Sincerely,
  >>>
  >>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
  >>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
  >>> Traffic Services NCO
  >>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
  >>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
  >>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
  >>>
  >>> charles leblanc oldmaison@yahoo.com wrote:
  >>>
  >>> Where are ya living now???? Since the media seem to ignore ya? I'll
  >>> sit down for a debate with a recorder for the blog...Now? Don't get
  >>> all exicted and send this all over the world.....lol
  >>>
  >>> ----- Original Message ----
  >>> From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
  >>> To: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca; whalen@fredericton.ca;
  >>> david.kelly@fredericton.ca; cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca;
  >>> stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca; tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca;
  >>> scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca; marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca;
  >>> walter.brown@fredericton.ca; norah.davidson@fredericton.ca;
  >>> mike.obrien@fredericton.ca; bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca;
  >>> dan.keenan@fredericton.ca; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca;
  >>> mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca;
  >>> jlmockler@mpor.ca; scotta@parl.gc.ca; michael.bray@gnb.ca;
  >>> jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
  >>> Cc: news@dailygleaner.com; kcarmichael@bloomberg.net;
  >>> oldmaison@yahoo.com; advocacycollective@yahoo.com;
  >>> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca; cityadmin@fredericton.ca;
  >>> info@gg.ca; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca; rchedore@mosherchedore.ca;
  >>> police@fredericton.ca; chebert@thestar.ca; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca;
  >>> Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca; alltrue@nl.rogers.com;
  >>> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca;
  >>> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
  >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:37:04 PM
  >>> Subject: I promised one of the Fat Fred City cop Randy Reilly that I
  >>> would try to make him famous
  >>>
  >>> http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=davidraymondamos&search=Search
  >>>
  >>> A man is only as good as his word EH? To bad priests, bankers,
  >>> politicians, lawyers and cops can't claim the same N'est Pas
  >>>
  >>> http://actionlyme.org/FBI_WIRETAPE_TAPES.htm
  >>>
  >>> FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006
  >>>
  >>> Senator Arlen Specter
  >>> United States Senate
  >>> Committee on the Judiciary
  >>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
  >>> Washington, DC 20510
  >>>
  >>> Dear Mr. Specter:
  >>>
  >>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
  >>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
  >>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
  >>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
  >>> contact with you about this previously.
  >>>
  >>> Very truly yours,
  >>> Barry A. Bachrach
  >>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
  >>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
  >>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/.
  >>>
  >>> Paulette Delaney-Smith Paulette.Delaney-Smith@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
  >>> David,
  >>>
  >>> I received your voice mail, I have been transferred to another unit
  >>> and I am unaware of who is dealing with your complaints at this time.
  >>>
  >>> Paulette Delaney-Smith, Cpl.
  >>> RCMPolice "J" DIvision HQ
  >>>
  >>>
  >>>
  >>> http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.com/2008/03/media-restrains-itself-inexplicably.html
  >>>
  >>> Threat against Burke taken seriously
  >>>
  >>> By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN
  >>> dgleg@nb.aibn.com
  >>> Published Thursday May 24th, 2007
  >>> Appeared on page A1
  >>> An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and
  >>> Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him
  >>> recently.
  >>>
  >>> Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't
  >>> explain the nature of the threats.
  >>>
  >>> "I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made
  >>> specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told reporters
  >>> Wednesday.
  >>>
  >>> "The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me to a
  >>> couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside or
  >>> have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have
  >>> some
  >>> added protection and that added comfort."
  >>>
  >>> The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP
  >>> security
  >>> unit.
  >>>
  >>> Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have
  >>> been in recent weeks.
  >>>
  >>> "When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you have
  >>> to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said.
  >>> "But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my own
  >>> personal safety."
  >>>
  >>> Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed his
  >>> pattern of activity.
  >>>
  >>> "It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife
  >>> feel awful nervous."
  >>>
  >>> Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a
  >>> lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick.
  >>>
  >>> "(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure my
  >>> family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in
  >>> general due
  >>> to my background and training.
  >>>
  >>> "I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had to
  >>> happen."
  >>>
  >>> Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security concerns.
  >>>
  >>> "We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where threats
  >>> have to be taken pretty seriously," he said.
  >>>
  >>> Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001,
  >>> security in New Brunswick has been
  >>> beefed up.
  >>>
  >>> Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all
  >>> visitors are screened.
  >>>
  >>> The position of attorney general is often referred to as the
  >>> province's "top cop."
  >>>
  >>> Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role as
  >>> the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually
  >>> prosecutes them.
  >>>
  >>> "With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had
  >>> numerous
  >>> threats since Day 1 in office."
  >>>
  >>> Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do with
  >>> it.
  >>>
  >>> "I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a matter
  >>> and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them
  >>> their punishment or their sanction," he said.
  >>>
  >>> Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated?
  >>>
  >>> "I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied.
  >>>
  >>> Reporters asked when the threat would be over.
  >>>
  >>> "I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said
  >>> Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source."
  >>>
  >>> Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative government,
  >>> said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not
  >>> complimentary."
  >>>
  >>> "I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the security
  >>> of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch.
  >>>
  >>> "They look at each and every situation."
  >>>
  >>> Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former
  >>> premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did
  >>> have extra security staff assigned on occasion.
  >>>
  >>> He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with the
  >>> RCMP.
  >>


https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=161231191936&story_fbid=10157581582056937

CBC New Brunswick

  ·
Allegations that Bhargava has mistreated patients at the Student
Health Centre were shared on Instagram and Facebook late last week.
Fredericton psychiatrist suspended by College of Physicians and Surgeons
cbc.ca
Fredericton psychiatrist suspended by College of Physicians and Surgeons
Reports that Dr. Manoj Bhargava mistreated patients at the Student
Health Centre came to light on Instagram and Facebook late last week.
23 Comments


Mike Archibald
THis came out of nowhere on media but its not 'new', on 'ratemydoctor'
these criticisms have been there for some time.


Josanne Landry
Mike Archibald - Unfortunately the College can't act on online ratings
until a verified patient contacts them with an official complaint.


Mike Archibald
I suspect it would probably take more than one 'official complaint'.
But I was more referring to CBC and other media that can certainly
look at online sources like that for story ideas.



David Raymond Amos
Mike Archibald Remember me and the Not So Good Doctor in 2008???



David Raymond Amos
Mike Archibald http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/11/from-top-of-world-to-scum-of-earth.html
FROM THE TOP OF THE WORLD TO THE SCUM OF THE EARTH
DAVIDRAYMONDAMOS3.BLOGSPOT.COM
CBC New Brunswick

  ·
Allegations that Bhargava has mistreated patients at the Student
Health Centre were shared on Instagram and Facebook late last week.
Fredericton psychiatrist suspended by College of Physicians and Surgeons
cbc.ca
Fredericton psychiatrist suspended by College of Physicians and Surgeons
Reports that Dr. Manoj Bhargava mistreated patients at the Student
Health Centre came to light on Instagram and Facebook late last week.
23 Comments


Mike Archibald
THis came out of nowhere on media but its not 'new', on 'ratemydoctor'
these criticisms have been there for some time.


Josanne Landry
Mike Archibald - Unfortunately the College can't act on online ratings
until a verified patient contacts them with an official complaint.


Mike Archibald
I suspect it would probably take more than one 'official complaint'.
But I was more referring to CBC and other media that can certainly
look at online sources like that for story ideas.


David Raymond Amos
Mike Archibald Remember me and the Not So Good Doctor in 2008???


David Raymond Amos
Mike Archibald http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/11/from-top-of-world-to-scum-of-earth.html



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:32:58 -0400
Subject: At least your lawyer Tim Ross can never deny that I am still
alive despite the fact I have been denied Heath Care since 2008 when a
doctor directed 3 members of the RCMP and two hospital security guards
to assault me CORRECT?
To: jmaher@nbms.nb.ca, tross@nbms.nb.ca, "victor.boudreau"
<victor.boudreau@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Larry.Tremblay"
<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, NPNBExecutiveoffice@gmail.com,
"Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "jeremy.keefe"
<jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tim Ross <tross@nbms.nb.ca>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 17:21:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Atttn John Maher and Tim Ross Why didn't
your boss Anthony Knight or several former Ministers of Health answer
me in writing years ago?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.

I will be out of office November 16 - 17, 2017.  I will have
intermittant access to my email, and will try to respond to your email
as soon as possible.

Best Regards,
Tim Ross

________________________________________________________________________________

Merci pour votre e-mail.

Je serai hors du bureau 16 - 17 novembre, 2017. Je vais avoir accès
intermittent à mon email , et je vais essayer de répondre à votre
e-mail dès que possible .

Cordialement,
Tim Ross


Manager, Economics & Negotiations | Gérant, Questions économiques
In-House Counsel | Avocat Général
New Brunswick Medical Society |Société Médicale du Nouveau-Brunswick
21 Alison Boulevard, Fredericton NB E3C 2N5
Tel/tél:   (506) 458-8860 ext. 674
1-800-661-2001
Email: tross@nbms.nb.ca<mailto:tross@nbms.nb.ca>
www.nbms.nb.ca<http://www.nbms.nb.ca/>


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This email message and any attachments are confidential and are
intended only for the person(s) or organization(s) named above.  The
information contained in this email message and any attachments is
private and confidential.  If you are not the intended recipient of
this message, you are prohibited from disseminating, distributing,
disclosing, reading, reproducing or otherwise using this
communication.  If you have received this communication in error,
please return it to the sender and delete all records of this email
message and any attachments from your computer.  Thank you.


On 11/16/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> John Maher
> Director, Economics & Negotiations
> (506) 462-4622
> jmaher@nbms.nb.ca
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nurse-practitioners-doctors-1.4404747
>
> Province doesn't let nurse practitioners fill health-care gaps, group says
> At least 20,000 residents of New Brunswick are without a health-care
> provider
> By Elizabeth Fraser, CBC News Posted: Nov 16, 2017 11:14 AM AT
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> To: <jimparrottmla@bellaliant.com>; <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>;
> "jeff.mockler"<jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>; <pascal.hache@gnb.ca>;
> <victor.boudreau@gnb.ca>; <janet.mcneil@gnb.ca>;
> <Rick.Howe@rci.rogers.com>; <brian.t.macdonald@gnb.ca>;
> "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>; <mmallory@nbms.nb.ca>;
> <aknight@nbms.nb.ca>; "execdirgen"<execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>;
> "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>; "Wayne.Lang"
> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "brent.blackmore"
> <brent.blackmore@fredericton.ca>
> Cc: "oldmaison"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "Margot"<Margot@nbu.ca>;
> "kennedyc"<kennedyc@nbnet.nb.ca>; <news919@rogers.com>;
> "briangallant10"<briangallant10@gmail.com>; <sandenn87@me.com>;
> <dale.graham@gnb.ca>; <denis.caissie@gnb.ca>; <shawn.graham2@gnb.ca>;
> <pcmemb@gnb.ca>; "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
> <claude.landry@gnb.ca>
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 2:28 AM
> Subject: Who should I sue the "Independent" Dr Jim Parrot and his
> greedy doctor pals or the evil lawyers Anytime Flemming, Mr
> "Unethical" EX Minister of Health Mikey Murphy???
>
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/04/24/nb-doctors-lawsuit-medicare-cuts.html
>
> Anthony Knight
> Chief Executive Officer
> (506) 458-8860 ext. 670
> aknight@nbms.nb.ca
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYtvhy9GaQY
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html
>
> When I look on the web and see that Chucky Baby and the new MLA the ex
> cop from Fat Fred City Carl Urquart crossed paths in Harvey and are
> now great pals, I see Red and wanna call Wally Stiles again.
>
> For the record it was Carl Urquart and his buddy Greggy Baby Thompson
> the MP and Minister (they share and office a couple hundred yards from
> where I was staying for the past year just outside of Fat fred City)
> that made the false allegatiions that allowed the RCMP to get me
> locked up in the looney bin for a bit. The doctors who got sucked in
> by the RCMP bullshit about me were.
>
> Manoj Bhargava
> Community Mental Health
> 65 Brunswick Street
> Fredericton NB E3B 5G6
> Psy 04-02883
> Guadalajara 1987
> (506)-453-2132
>
> Zlatko Banic
> 69 Bliss Carman Drive Fredericton NB E3B 9P2
> Psy 03-02785
> Novi Sad 1981
> (506)-460-1905
>
> Dr.Jane V. Findlater
> Everett Chalmers Hospital
> PO Box 9000 Fredericton
> NB E3B 5N5 EmM 75-01333
> Dal 1974 (
> 506)-452-5058
> (506)-452-5645
>
>
>
> The New Brunswick Medical Society will launch a legal challenge
> against the Alward government’s decision to cut the amount doctors can
> bill medicare for services.
>
> The medical society announced its decision to fight the budgetary
> decision in court during a news conference in Fredericton on
> Wednesday.
>
> The organization, which represents the province’s doctors, said it
> believes the provincial government’s decision to cut medicare billing
> funds goes against a signed agreement it has with the government.
>
> Officials say they will file their challenge "imminently.”
>
> Dr. Robert Desjardins, the president of the New Brunswick Medical
> Society, said the board’s decision was unanimous.
>
> “The decision that we have unfortunately taken to go to court to have
> our agreement respected is unanimous among the representatives on our
> board, which again represents everyone in the province, and without
> any dissension,” he said.
>
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. Because of the nature of
> the allegations made in your message, I have taken the measure of
> forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve Graham of the RCMP
> "J" Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
> "Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear that
> Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and the
> US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing in
> Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Cleary, Dr. Eilish (DH/MS)"<Dr.Eilish.Cleary@gnb.ca>
> Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 12:31:56 -0300
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr Eilesh Cleary I called you weeks ago and you have
> not responded yet. Howcome?
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Apologies for not responding to your earlier email. I did receive it
> thank you. I struggle sometimes to keep up with the volume of emails I
> get so I don't get to respond to each and every one, although I
> certainly appreciate when people take the time to write
> Eilish Cleary
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2013 09:57 PM Atlantic Standard Time
> To: Cleary, Dr. Eilish (DH/MS)
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Subject: Attn Dr Eilesh Cleary I called you weeks ago and you have not
> responded yet. Howcome?
>
> I am not surprised but rather disappointed anyway. I thought that
> maybe just maybe you were ethical and gave you the benefit of my
> doubts
>
> However when I read the news today I just shook my head and was mad at
> myself because I know better than to trust a a high paid bureaucrat
> such as your evil former underling Van Buynder or even my friend Ken
> Ross.
>
> Its kinda obvious that you governement are just playing words games
> and that the greasy gasy oily guys will get what they want for nothing
> just like they always do.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/05/10/nb-cleary-reax-blueprint.html
>
> Be they Doctoer or lawyer or Indian Chief the personal wealth of a
> bureaucrat is far more important to them than the health or wealth of
> the people they purportedly serve.
>
> If you wish to dispute me have the sand to call me back or respond  to
> a simple email
>
> Forget trying to lock me up in your looney bin aggain. That nonsens
> did not work out to well for ya the last time Van Buynder and the
> corrupt RCMP tried that trick on me in 2010 and it appears that you
> were his boss the whole time Correct?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>
> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Dr Eilesh Cleary I am very impressed with your Integrity and
> gumption
> To: Eilish.Cleary@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Dr Elish Cleary
> Chief Medical Officer
> HSBC Place
> Floor: 5
> P. O. Box 5100
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5G8
> Phone : (506) 444-2112
> Eilish.Cleary@gnb.ca
>
> If you ever need help dealing with the :Powers that Be in this Place
> trust that is lots I can do but for now less is more Please use our
> resources to print this pdf file an stow it away for a rainy day.
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
>
> Then if push comes to shove someday merely mention my name and watch
> their eyes. The email below and the link to a Youtube should prove you
> I can put the Heath Minister over a barrel in a New York minute  (Its
> always about the money) .
>
>  If the smiling bastards still won't change their tune with you even
> after you show them the letters within the pdf file above, email me or
> give me a call and leave a message if I don't pick up. I will do my
> best to assist you ASAP.
>
> Best Regards and Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
 
 
 

Freedom Convoy leader Pat King granted bail

$
0
0

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GkooN2ap4A&ab_channel=CityNews

 

'Trucker Convoy' organizer Pat King granted bail with conditions

4,827 views
Jul 18, 2022
 384K subscribers
Pat King, an organizer of the “Freedom Convoy” protests that occupied downtown Ottawa for three weeks earlier this year, has been released on bail.
David Amos
Methinks Patty Baby and his lawyer can still talk to me if they dare N'esy Pas?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NvWNx0uDTY8&ab_channel=OttawaSun

 


RAW: Pat King released on bail, leaves Ottawa courthouse

3,366 views
Jul 18, 2022
2.65K subscribers
Patrick King, one of the leaders of the “Freedom Convoy” protest in downtown Ottawa last winter, has been released from jail as he awaits trial. King was arrested Feb. 18 and had been in custody since then. Superior Court Justice Anne London-Weinstein granted King bail on Monday morning under conditions that include him returning to Alberta as soon as possible.
 
David Amos
Methinks its pretty funny that he got to show Ottawa his fat nasty arse Nesy Pas?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXL6l1So--E&ab_channel=LiveFromTheShed

 

Live - Pat King Released on Bail

5,730 views
Streamed live 4 hours ago
39.6K subscribers
Pat King was released today from Ottawa under strict bail conditions including a curfew and shutting down his website and social media pages.
 
David Amos
Too Too Funny 
 
 
 
 

Pat King has been released! @DACEY MEDIA

5,501 views
Jul 18, 2022
1KDislikeShareThanksSave
39.6K subscribers
Pat King is released from the Ottawa court house under strict bail conditions and will be returning to Alberta soon. Footage by @DACEY MEDIA
 

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xc8Wj8GzUpU&ab_channel=DACEYMEDIA

 

Holy Sh*t, It's VIVA FREI - Great chat with Viva Frei at FREEDOM CONVOY 2022 in Ottawa, ON

53 views
Feb 22, 2022
90 subscribers
I had a fantastic chat with Viva Frei after nearly spilling my coffee on him at Freedom Convoy 2022
 
Robert Bourbeau
That dude was cool as h e double hockey sticks
1
Viva Frei is a good man. He was doing great work on the ground here. I had gone out to try to meet him the first day he came here, saw him but didn't chat. I was just walking down the street with frozen hand spilling coffee when I realized it was him. It's was a pretty good chat I though. It was like we were old friends almost. I'd love to have a chat with him about everything that's happened since some of the legalities about it.
 
 
David Amos
Say Hoka Hey to Little Davey and Big Bad Patty Baby's minions or me will ya???

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysMCExmdopg&ab_channel=VivaFrei 

 

Steve Bannon Trial Day1; Pat King "Released"; Ray Epps & MORE! Viva Mondays!

50,326 views
Streamed live 6 hours ago
 544K subscribers
Bannon trial Day 1. Pat King released. Ray Epps AND MORE!
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YZRDdkkMjI&ab_channel=TorontoStar 

 


Pat King granted bail after 150 days behind bars on ‘Freedom Convoy’ charges

10,695 views
Jul 18, 2022
 89.3K subscribers
While on bail the 44-year-old must return to Alberta, live under a curfew, and is banned from social media, organizing convoy-related demonstrations, and contacting fellow leaders of the “freedom” protests in Ottawa this winter.

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/pat-king-freedom-convoy-bail-decision-1.6523763 

 

Freedom Convoy leader Pat King granted bail

King had been in jail since February for role in Freedom Convoy protest

A key figure of the Freedom Convoy protest has been granted bail after spending five months in jail, an Ottawa court decided Monday.

Pat King emerged from the Elgin Street courthouse to hugs and cheers from supporters, who waved Canadian flags and chanted "freedom." King couldn't speak to reporters as a condition of his release.

The decision on King's bail status came after a two-day bail review hearing last week. There's a publication ban on the evidence and reasons for the decision.

King was back in an Ottawa courtroom after waiting months to hear if he would be released on bail, since his bail review in April came to an abrupt halt due to new charges against him and an apparent hacking of his lawyer's computer during the review. 

King's then-defence lawyer had requested a review of the decision to keep him in custody until his trial begins.

Since then, King has tapped a new lawyer to fight for his release and defend him against a mounting number of charges.

King, an Alberta resident, was a leading figure in the weeks-long convoy protest against COVID-19 restrictions, and was arrested on Feb. 18 on four charges: mischief, counselling to commit mischief, counselling to commit the offence of disobeying a court order and counselling to obstruct police. He faces additional charges of obstructing justice and perjury.

On Monday, Justice Anne London-Weinstein read out the conditions of King's release. They are: 

  • To vacate Ottawa as soon as possible, and no later than 24 hours.
  • To reside with a surety under supervision until he can take a flight to Edmonton.
  • Ottawa Police Service can check the surety's residence if required.
  • To reside with a surety in Alberta.
  • To be in employment under a surety.
  • To have no contact or communication with other Freedom Convoy leaders and stakeholders: Chris Barber, Tamara Lich, Daniel Bulford, Benjamin Dichter, James Bauder, Tyson Billings, Owen Swiderski, Tom Marrazzo, and Brian Carr. (Unless it's through counsel, or for his preparations for defence for his criminal charges.)
  • No protesting or public assembly, specifically related to COVID-19 pandemic, the Freedom Convoy and anti-government demonstration.
  • No social media in any form, no posting messages or having others post on his behalf. He must deactivate his Real Pat King website, Facebook page and other social media accounts within 48 hours, through a surety or counsel.
  • No giving interviews, including on social media.
  • To abide by a curfew of 10 p.m. to 6 a.m., unless he's with sureties. King must provide proof to police he is with a surety, if he's unavailable for a door-knock check.
  • King must post a $25,000 cash bond, to guarantee his next court appearance.
  • No possession of weapons or ammunition.

In June, a pastor who tried visiting regularly with King in jail at the Ottawa-Carleton Detention Centre said King was "pretty beat down."

With files from the Canadian Press

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/07/freedom-convoy-leader-pat-king-granted.html

Monday, 18 July 2022

Freedom Convoy leader Pat King granted bail

‘Freedom Convoy’ organizer Pat King granted bail

OTTAWA - Pat King, an organizer of the “Freedom Convoy” that paralyzed downtown Ottawa for three weeks last winter, has been granted bail.

The decision was delivered in an Ottawa courtroom Monday by Superior Court Justice Anne London-Weinstein.

OTTAWA - Pat King, an organizer of the “Freedom Convoy” that paralyzed downtown Ottawa for three weeks last winter, has been granted bail.

The decision was delivered in an Ottawa courtroom Monday by Superior Court Justice Anne London-Weinstein.

The proceedings were covered by a publication ban.

King nodded as the judge’s reasons were handed down, wearing a plaid shirt and his hair in a long braid.

In the courtroom, supporters wearing t-shirts that said “Free Pat King” brought tissues to their eyes as the judge delivered her decision.

London-Weinstein said King will have to leave Ottawa within 24 hours to return to Alberta, where he will be required to live with a surety.

When he emerged from the courthouse, King was met with cheers and a chant of “freedom” from a dozen supporters. He responded by pumping his fist in the air.

Conditions of King’s bail include a ban on social media use and to refrain from taking part in activities related to the convoy.

King is also forbidden from contacting other convoy organizers including Chris Barber, Benjamin Dichter, Tamara Lich and Tom Marazzo unless in the presence of counsel.

He is also expected to adhere to a curfew of 10 p.m. until 6 a.m.

Asked on the courthouse steps if King can abide by the bail conditions, his lawyer, Natasha Calvinho, said: “I think he can. I think that the five months in jail has been a harsh situation ... I think that he will.”

King was back in court last week after a hearing in April came to an abrupt halt when his lawyer’s computer appeared to be hacked.

The day after the April hearing, the Crown announced it was charging King with three counts each of perjury and obstruction of justice.

The latest accusations were in addition to 10 charges related to King’s involvement in the Ottawa events last winter.

The previous charges include mischief, intimidation, obstructing police and disobeying a court order.

Hundreds of big rigs and other trucks caused gridlock on Ottawa’s downtown streets for weeks as people protested COVID-19 health restrictions and the Liberal government.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 18, 2022.

 

Bail review for 'Freedom Convoy' organizer Pat King to continue on Thursday

An earlier hearing in April came to an abrupt and unexpected halt when his lawyer's computer appeared to be hacked

 OTTAWA -

“Freedom Convoy” organizer Pat King is waiting to hear whether he will be released on bail, with a bail review set to continue for a second day Thursday.

He was back in an Ottawa courtroom Wednesday after an earlier hearing in April came to an abrupt and unexpected halt when his lawyer's computer appeared to be hacked.

Since then, King has tapped a new lawyer to fight for his release and defend him against a mounting number of charges.

The day after the April hearing, the Crown announced it was charging King with three counts each of perjury and obstruction of justice.

The details of the testimony that led to those allegations are protected by a publication ban.

The proceedings on Wednesday were also covered by a publication ban.

The latest accusations are in addition to 10 charges related to King's involvement in the downtown Ottawa protest earlier this year.

The previous charges include mischief, intimidation, obstructing police and disobeying a court order.

King was arrested on Feb. 18 for his involvement in the three-week protest against COVID-19 restrictions that overran the streets of Ottawa.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 13, 2022.

---

This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Meta and Canadian Press News Fellowship.

 

 

---------- Original message ------------
From: Natasha Calvinho <natasha.calvinho@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:52:53 -0700
Subject: Auto Response Re: YO Lawrence Greenspon I called again about your client Madame Lich and attempted to speak with Eric Granger Correct?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Please note that I am in a homicide trial from June 20th to July 22nd, 2022. As a result there will be a delay in my ability to respond to emails as quickly as normal. If your matter is urgent, please contact my office at 613-680-0868.

--

Natasha J Calvinho

Tel: 613.680.0868 / Cell:613.222.8323 / Fax: 613.691.1043

116 Lisgar St., Suite 401

Ottawa ON K2P 0C2

 

Calvinho Criminal Defence





---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bergen, Candice - M.P."<candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:52:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Lawrence Greenspon I called again about
your client Madame Lich and attempted to speak with Eric Granger Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Hon. Candice Bergen, thank you for contacting the
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.

Ms. Bergen greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
possible.

If you are a constituent of Ms. Bergen’s in Portage-Lisgar with an
urgent matter please provide complete contact information.  Not
identifying yourself as a constituent could result in a delayed
response.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,

Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Au nom de l’hon. Candice Bergen, nous vous remercions de communiquer
avec le Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle.

Mme Bergen accorde une grande importance aux commentaires des
Canadiens.  Nous lisons et étudions tous les courriels entrants.
Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.  Nous y
répondons le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous faites partie de l’électorat de Mme Bergen dans la
circonscription de Portage-Lisgar et que votre affaire est urgente,
veuillez fournir vos coordonnées complètes.  Si vous ne le faites pas,
cela pourrait retarder la réponse.

Nous vous remercions une fois encore d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,

Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:54:39 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:54:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Lawrence Greenspon I called again about
your client Madame Lich and attempted to speak with Eric Granger Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.


---------- Original message ---------- 
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 17:54:49 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Lawrence Greenspon I called again about
your client Madame Lich and attempted to speak with Eric Granger Correct?


Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>


Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 14:52:46 -0300
Subject: YO Lawrence Greenspon I called again about your client Madame
Lich and attempted to speak with Eric Granger Correct?
To: lawrence@gghlawyers.ca, "david.fraser"
<david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>, David.Fraser@cbc.ca,
premier@ontario.ca, stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com,
sheilagunnreid@gmail.com, eric@gghlawyers.ca, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Candice.Bergen"<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>,
natasha.calvinho@gmail.com, Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"
<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
livefromtheshed2022@gmail.com, meghan.grant@cbc.ca,
lexharvey@thestar.ca, darren.major@cbc.ca, blilley@postmedia.com,
brigitte.bureau@radio-canada.ca

https://gghlawyers.ca/who-we-are/our-team/eric-granger/

"Eric Granger is a criminal defence lawyer who focusses on defending
the little guy against the coercive power of the state. He represents
clients at all stages of the criminal process, from bail hearings to
trials to appeals."


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwRKVT9VMfA&ab_channel=RebelNews 

 

Tamara Lich's lawyer Keith Wilson with Ezra Levant on why the Freedom Convoy organizer was arrested

24,654 views
Jun 28, 2022
 1.57M subscribers
SIGN THE PETITION ► http://www.FreeTamara.caTamara Lich, one of the organizers of the convoy to Ottawa, was arrested last night on a Canada-wide warrant.

 

YEA RIGHT

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmMtSku2UbE&ab_channel=LiveFromTheShed 

 

Tamara Lich in North Bay! Meeting her for the first time ❤️

25,744 views
37.8K subscribers
Tamara Lich stops in North Bay, Ontario to meet friends on her way home. It’s not every day you meet your heroes!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXxOMUgm70U&ab_channel=LiveFromTheShed 


Tamara Lich Arrested in Alberta

22,817 views
Streamed live on Jun 28, 2022
36.9K subscribers
Tamara Lich has been arrested again after the RCMP issued a nation wide warrant for breaching her release order.

 

 
 

Tamara Lich Arrested AGAIN! Canada Day Criminalized AND MORE! Viva Frei Live!

52,227 views
Streamed live on Jun 28, 2022
 543K subscribers
Canada is the new China.
 
 
 

655 Comments

 
Links: 
 Keith on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ikwilson 

 
 

David Amos
Cry me a river

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Uur9IILQ5M&ab_channel=TrueNorth

  

The persecution continues: Tamara Lich re-arrested in Alberta

16,089 views
Streamed live on Jun 28, 2022
75.5K subscribers
Freedom Convoy fundraiser and organizer Tamara Lich was arrested in her hometown of Medicine Hat, Alberta last night on a Canada-wide warrant at the behest of Ottawa police, on allegations she violated her bail conditions. Within the next week, Lich will be transported back to Ottawa. Police have not yet said what bail conditions Lich supposedly breached. True North's Andrew Lawton says the state continues to throw the book at her to dissuade others from taking the principled stands for liberty Lich has through the convoy and since. Convoy lawyer Keith Wilson joins The Andrew Lawton Show live to discuss. 
 
David Amos
Methinks the "Convoy Lawyer" Keith Wilson is a very nervous camper Nesy Pas?

 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/freedom-convoy-tamara-lich-arrested-1.6503718

 

Freedom convoy leader Tamara Lich arrested in Alberta, accused of breaching bail conditions

Lich told her lawyer she is expecting to be transported to Ontario in the next week

Lich was taken into custody Monday evening, according to Keith Wilson, who represents Lich on her non-criminal cases including a lawsuit.

Wilson, who spoke with Lich after her arrest, says she expects to be transported back to Ottawa in the next week.

Eric Granger, who is one of Lich's criminal defence lawyers also confirmed Lich's arrest.

Granger says he has no reason to believe his client has done anything wrong and is "looking to learn more at this stage."

"Based on everything we knew, she's been diligently complying with all of her bail conditions as was noted by the judge at her recent bail review.

While it's not yet clear which bail conditions she is accused of breaching, there is speculation on social media that Lich might be in legal trouble over a Facebook photo that shows her beside a fellow convoy organizer who she was ordered to stay away from by a judge. 

Canada-wide warrant

Lich faces charges of mischief, counselling mischief, obstructing police, counselling to obstruct police, counselling intimidation and intimidation by blocking and obstructing one or more highways for her role as one of the organizers of the protest that shut down much of downtown Ottawa earlier this year.

RCMP confirmed Lich was wanted on a Canada-wide warrant for breaching her release order but did not have further information as the arrest falls within the jurisdiction of the Medicine Hat Police Service (MHPS).

The MHPS says it will not release information until Tuesday morning. 

WATCH | Supporters cheer Tamara Lich as she is released from jail last winter:

Convoy organizer Tamara Lich released from jail

4 months ago
Duration 1:11
Tamara Lich, one of the organizers of the weeks-long occupation in downtown Ottawa, was released from jail on Monday with the condition that she leave Ottawa. Lich was arrested Feb. 17 and charged with counselling to commit mischief.

The anti-COVID-19 restriction blockades gridlocked Ottawa for three weeks last winter as protesters parked trucks that blocked neighbourhood access and main arteries around Parliament Hill.

After her arrest, Lich was released on bail in March on conditions which include staying off social media. She cannot organize any kind of protest and she is also not permitted to contact several of the other convoy leaders, including Tom Marazzo, an ex-military officer, who also had a failed bid as an Ontario MPP candidate.

Lich was subject to a bail review last month where prosecutors unsuccessfully sought to have her taken back into custody for allegedly violating her bail condition that she not support anything related to the Freedom Convoy.

Weeks after she was granted release in March, Lich was notified she'd been selected as a recipient of a freedom award, handed out by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF), a legal organization and registered charity based in Calgary.

Tamara Lich, fourth from the left, was ordered by a judge to have no contact with fellow convoy organizer Tom Marazzo, who is tagged as being second from the right. This photo shows the group in Toronto after Lich accepted her freedom award from the JCCF. (Facebook/Stacey Kauder )

The awards ceremony took place on June 16 in Toronto. 

The Ottawa judge ruled he would not revoke Lich's bail and instead, varied her conditions to allow travel to Ontario with a restriction that she be banned from entering the capital's downtown core.

Lich's reasoning for wanting to travel back to Ottawa is protected by a court-ordered publication ban and cannot be reported.

But on June 17, the day after the freedom awards were presented, Stacey Kauder, who describes Lich as a friend, posted a photo to her Facebook page showing Lich with her husband and four other attendees at the JCCF gala.

To Lich's left is a man identified as Marazzo, a fellow convoy organizer, who she was ordered to have no contact with unless her lawyer is present.

Friends of the two convoy organizers speculated on social media that Lich was allowed to have contact with Marazzo at the event because there were lawyers for the JCCF present who also represent Lich in her civil matters.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Meghan Grant

CBC Calgary crime reporter

Meghan Grant is a justice affairs reporter. She has been covering courts, crime and stories of police accountability in southern Alberta for more than a decade. Send Meghan a story tip at meghan.grant@cbc.ca or follow her on Twitter.

With files from Paula Duhatschek and David Fraser

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 


 

---------- Original message ------------
From: Natasha Calvinho <natasha.calvinho@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 09:11:43 -0700
Subject: Auto Response Re: Kempa said with a cloud of doubt hovering over the country's national police force, Blair should testify under oath. Methinks you should too N'esy Pas Marco Mendicino???
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Please note that I am in a homicide trial from June 20th to July 22nd, 2022. As a result there will be a delay in my ability to respond to emails as quickly as normal. If your matter is urgent, please contact my office at 613-680-0868.

--

Natasha J Calvinho

Tel: 613.680.0868 / Cell:613.222.8323 / Fax: 613.691.1043

116 Lisgar St., Suite 401

Ottawa ON K2P 0C2

 

Calvinho Criminal Defence

 

---------- Original message ----------
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2022 13:11:35 -0300
Subject: Kempa said with a cloud of doubt hovering over the country's
national police force, Blair should testify under oath. Methinks you
should too N'esy Pas Marco Mendicino???
To: bestdamnroofer@hotmail.com, freedomcentralcanada@gmail.com,
"Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy
<traversy.n@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
"stefanos.karatopis"<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, Dave Steenburg
<davesteenburg269@gmail.com>, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, Viva Frei <david@vivafrei.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, natasha.calvinho@gmail.com, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Anita.Anand"<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Chrystia.Freeland"
<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>, "Candice.Bergen"
<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"pierre.poilievre"<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>,
maverickmultimedia@mail.com, inunn@superaje.com,
artinfo6@digitaldoor.net, temp3@digitaldoor.net, mboudreau@stu.ca,
kent.roach@utoronto.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
livefromtheshed2022@gmail.com, freedom2canada@outlook.com,
gregory.re@fox.com, Cmd4pc@gmail.com, james@jamesbowielaw.com,
ontario@cp.org, JustinWells@foxnews.com, ottawanews@ctv.ca,
Michael.Kempa@uottawa.ca, drkempa@gmail.com

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/06/rcmp-commissioner-brenda-lucki-tried-to.html

Wednesday, 22 June 2022

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki tried to ‘jeopardize’ mass murder
investigation to advance Trudeau’s gun control efforts

Deja Vu Anyone???

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html

Wednesday, 29 July 2020

Federal and provincial governments to hold public inquiry into Nova
Scotia mass shootings


> Robert H. Pineo
> 902-405-8177
> rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca
>
>
> Sandra L. McCulloch
> 902-896-6114
> smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:04:13 -0300
> Subject: YO Bill.Blair Now that a full Public Inquiry is in order
> Methinks people such as Anne McLellan, Ralph Goodale Leanne Fitch,
> Allan Carroll, Mark Furey and YOU should testify under oath N'esy Pas?
> To: Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, CabalCookies
> < cabalcookies@protonmail.com>, El.Jones@msvu.ca,
> tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp.gc.ca, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB
> < JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com,
> "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "kevin.leahy"
> < kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca>, lagenomai4@protonmail.com,
> mlaritcey@bellaliant.com, mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com,
> toryrushtonmla@bellaliant.com, kelly@kellyregan.ca,
> mla_assistant@alanapaon.com, stephenmcneil@ns.aliantzinc.ca, PREMIER
> < PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, info@hughmackay.ca, pictoueastamanda@gmail.com,
> markfurey.mla@eastlink.ca, claudiachendermla@gmail.com,
> FinanceMinister@novascotia.ca, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, istayhealthy8@gmail.com,
> prmi@eastlink.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>,
> "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:48:08 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry
> Event." Methinks it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by
> the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca
>
>>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> After backlash, governments agree to hold public inquiry into Nova
> Scotia shooting
> By Alexander Quon & Elizabeth McSheffrey Global News
> Posted July 28, 2020 10:42 am
>
> WATCH: The federal government is now proceeding with a public inquiry
> into the Nova Scotia massacre that left 22 innocent people dead in
> April. Elizabeth McSheffrey looks at why Ottawa is changing paths now,
> and what the inquiry has the power to do.
>
> The decision to hold a review into the mass killing in April that
> resulted in the deaths of 22 people in Nova Scotia took three months
> to arrange. In less than a week the decision has been undone after a
> massive wave of public backlash.
>
> Federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair announced on Tuesday a
> public inquiry will be held into the mass shooting that began in
> Portapique, N.S. on April 18 and came to an end nearly 100 km away, 13
> hours later.
>
> “The Government of Canada is now proceeding with a full Public
> Inquiry, under the authority of the Inquiries Act,” said Blair in a
> statement.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Allan Carroll <allan.carroll@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:14:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: Trust that Murray Segal's appointment to whitewash the
> Rehteah Parsons matter did not surprise me after the meail I sent this
> weekend (AOL)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be AOL commencing  July 27, 2013  and returning on August 13,
> 2013.  Cpl David Baldwin of Amherst Det will be assuming my duties
> during my absence. Should you require immediate assistance, please
> contact the main Amherst office number at 902-667-3859.
>
> For inquiries about the Crisis Negotiation Team, please contact
> Sgt.Royce MacRae at 902-720-5426 (w) or 902-471-8776 (c)
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Leanne"<leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:05:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Now this
> is interesting As soon as Brad Wall got reelected as Premier he began
> blocking my email Go Figure EH David Drummond???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
> an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be repleid
> to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response please send
> your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton Police Force,
> 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506) 460-2300.
>
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
> retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
> and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
> appreciated.
>
> Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
> of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
> provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
> Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
> organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
> confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
> interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
> disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
> fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
> présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
> et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
> électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
> reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
>
> Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
> Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
> dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
> de la vie privée.
>
> GOV-OP-073
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:39:00 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks this afternoon Harjit Sajjan and
> his minions should go to Federal Court pull my file (T-1557-15) from
> the docket then read statement 83 real slow N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
> message sera examin? avec attention.
> Merci!
> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
> S?curit? publique Canada
> *********
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
> Thank you!
> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
> Public Safety Canada
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Leanne"<leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:38:59 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks this afternoon Harjit Sajjan and
> his minions should go to Federal Court pull my file (T-1557-15) from
> the docket then read statement 83 real slow N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
> an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your message may not be
> responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
> please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
> Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
> 460-2300. If this is an emergency related to public safety please call
> 911.
>
> En raison du grand nombre de courriels que reçoit cette messagerie, il
> se peut qu’une réponse tarde un peu à venir. Si vous avez besoin d'une
> réponse officielle, veuillez envoyer votre demande par écrit à mon
> attention aux soins (a/s) de la Force policière de Fredericton 311,
> rue Queen, Fredericton, NB   E3B 1B1, ou composer le 506 460-2300.
> S'il s'agit d'une urgence de sécurité publique, faites le 911.
>
>
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
> retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
> and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
> appreciated.
>
> Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
> of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
> provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
> Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
> organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
> confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
> interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
> disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
> fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
> présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
> et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
> électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
> reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
>
> Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
> Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
> dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
> de la vie privée.
>
> GOV-OP-073
>
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> Friday, 18 September 2015
> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>


 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/lucki-nova-scotia-shooting-interference-trudeau-1.6498884


Trudeau says Ottawa 'had a lot of questions' after N.S. mass shooting
but didn't interfere in investigation
'What we're seeing is this tragedy being used to further a political
agenda,' says families' lawyer

Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Jun 23, 2022 1:26 PM ET


     A memorial in front of the RCMP detachment on April 20, 2020 in
Enfield, Nova Scotia, honours RCMP Constable Heidi Stevenson, who was
one of 22 people killed during the shooting rampage. The gunman
masqueraded across rural Nova Scotia in a police uniform and mock RCMP
cruiser. (Tim Krochak/Getty Images)

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says the federal government had
questions about the 2020 mass shooting in Nova Scotia but remained
adamant his government did not interfere in the investigation.

His comments come as the law firm representing the families of more
than a dozen of the victims pushes to have a member of Trudeau's
cabinet testify following allegations there was political pressure
about what to say in the aftermath of the deadliest mass shooting in
Canadian history.

Members of Parliament on the House of Commons Public Safety and
National Security Committee voted Thursday to call key players —
including RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki, Nova Scotia RCMP Supt.
Darren Campbell, former RCMP communications director Lia Scanlan, and
Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair — to testify at committee
next month into allegations of political interference.

An exact date for the meeting has not been set.

"We did not put any undue influence or pressure. It is extremely
important to highlight that it is only the RCMP, it is only police
that determine what and when to release information," said Trudeau,
during a Thursday scrum with reporters in Kigali, Rwanda where he's
attending a Commonwealth summit.

"I will highlight, however, that when the worst mass shooting in
Canada's history happened, we had a lot of questions. Canadians had a
lot of questions."

Rob Pineo, a partner at Patterson Law, said they will be asking that
Blair, who was the minister of public safety at the time of the
shooting spree, and former Nova Scotia justice minister Mark Furey
appear before the Mass Casualty Commission about any potential
interference.

WATCH | Trudeau addresses claims of government interference in Nova
Scotia mass shooting probe
Trudeau addresses claims of government interference in Nova Scotia
mass shooting probe
22 hours ago
Duration 1:13
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau responds to questions about whether his
government interfered with the investigation into the 2020 mass
shooting in Nova Scotia.

The inquiry is investigating the April 18-19, 2020, rampage that
claimed the lives of 22 people — including a pregnant woman — and left
several people injured and several homes destroyed.

"Certainly we want to get to the bottom of it and we think that this
inquiry is the perfect forum in which to do that," Pineo said from
Truro, N.S.

"It's very disturbing if in fact it turns out to be factual. Really,
from our client's point of view, what we're seeing is this tragedy
being used to further a political agenda and political careers and
quite frankly, that's very upsetting to our clients."

Trudeau said he still "very much" has confidence in Lucki, who he
appointed in 2018, as she battles a new scandal after handwritten
notes from Nova Scotia RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell were released
earlier this week as part of the inquiry.

In Campbell's notes, which were written after an April 28, 2020
conference call between headquarters and the division, he alleges that
Lucki was upset that the RCMP in Nova Scotia were not revealing more
information about the weapons used because she had promised the
federal government — which was considering gun control legislation at
the time — that they would raise it.

    Mountie who wrote that RCMP head interfered in N.S. investigation
'came to his own conclusions,' says Blair

    Top Mountie denies claim she interfered in N.S. shooting investigation

"The Commissioner said she had promised the minister of public safety
and the Prime Minister's Office that the RCMP would release this
information," he wrote.

Campbell said he believed releasing information about the firearms
might hurt the investigation.

"I tried to explain there was no intent to disrespect anyone, however
we could not release this information at this time. The commissioner
then said that we didn't understand, that this was tied to pending gun
control legislation that would make officers and the public safer," he
wrote.
Gun ban announced days later

Just days after that April 28 meeting, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
announced a ban on some 1,500 firearm makes and models, including two
of the guns used in the Nova Scotia mass shooting — a Colt Law
Enforcement Carbine, a semi-automatic weapon, and a Ruger Mini-14.

At that time, police had still not released the specific makes and
models used in the attacks. That information didn't become public
until the fall of 2020, when the National Post reported details of the
weapons after obtaining a briefing note prepared for the prime
minister after the shooting.

Investigators have said they believe the shooter, Gabriel Wortman, who
didn't have a firearms licence, obtained three of the guns used during
the massacre in Maine and smuggled them into Canada.

    In his notes from the time, RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell wrote that
RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was upset that police in Nova Scotia
were not revealing more information about the weapons used in the
April 2020 mass shooting. The notes were released Tuesday as part of
the Mass Casualty Commission probe. (Robert Guertin/CBC)

Lucki issued a statement Tuesday evening where she wrote that
briefings with the public safety minister are necessary, particularly
during a mass shooting, but said there was no interference.

"I would never take actions or decisions that could jeopardize an
investigation," she wrote.  "I take the principle of police
independence extremely seriously, and it has been and will continue to
be fully respected in all interactions."

Trudeau said he received regular briefings on what police knew and
didn't know abut the shooter and the case.

"Those answers continue to come out," he said. "We will continue to
take responsible action."

On Wednesday Blair swatted down Campbell's written account of the call.

"The superintendent obviously came to his own conclusions and his
notes reflect that," he said.

WATCH | Government denies interfering in N.S. mass shooting investigation:
Government denies interfering in N.S. mass shooting investigation
2 days ago
Duration 2:09
The government continued to deny allegations of political interference
in the Nova Scotia mass shooting investigation. A report alleged RCMP
Commissioner Brenda Lucki asked officers for more information about
guns used in the massacre to share with the public safety minister and
the prime minister as they worked on new gun-control legislation.

"But I'm telling you, and I would tell the superintendent if I spoke
to him, I made no effort to pressure the RCMP to interfere in any way
with their investigation. I gave no direction as to what information
they should communicate."

In a statement to CBC News Thursday, Campbell declined to respond
saying he's waiting to be interviewed by the Mass Casualty Commission.

"I also expect to be called to the MCC as a witness sometime near the
end of July and I look forward to both opportunities," he wrote.

"As such, it would be inappropriate for me to make any public comments
prior to giving evidence under oath. I hope that you understand."
Ex-communications head says there was 'political pressure'

Campbell is not the only one to have flagged influence coming from
Ottawa during the rampage's aftermath.

In an interview with commission investigators earlier this year, Lia
Scanlan, the RCMP's former civilian director of the strategic
communications unit in the province, said Blair and the prime minister
"were weighing in on what we could and couldn't say."

She said Lucki was advised not to do media interviews but did anyway,
and in so doing, gave inaccurate information

Lucki initially shared that 17 people died, information RCMP had
confirmed internally, when the local commanders only said "in excess
of 10" people lost lives in a press briefing the evening of April 19.

"She went out and did that and knew damn well – and it was all
political pressure," said Scanlan.

Lia Scanlan was the head of communications for Nova Scotia RCMP in
April 2020. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

"That is 100 per cent Minister Blair and the prime minister and we
have a commissioner that does not push back."
'Not necessarily illegal,' says criminology prof

Michael Kempa, an associate professor of criminology, said a minister
or a mayor asking for information is not illegal, but it's not
necessarily appropriate.

"I was not surprised, but I was dismayed in the sense that this type
of political interference in RCMP operations has been all too common.
It's not necessarily illegal, but where it's not done properly — in
writing, in public so that citizens can decide whether or not it's
reasonable — It brings the RCMP into disrepute," he said.

"It's a shame for the RCMP that this type of thing continues to happen."

While the RCMP commissioner is accountable to the minister, they are
meant to operate independently.

The Supreme Court of Canada has made clear that the "commissioner is
not to be considered a servant or agent of the government while
engaged in a criminal investigation."

Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino said "there was an exchange of
information" after the shooting but maintained there was no
interference.

"I think it is incredibly important that Canadians have trust in their
institutions, including the RCMP and all law enforcement," said
Mendicino, who has been tasked with reforming the RCMP.

"What is important for Canadians is that there is a line of respect
that was demonstrated around the principle of operational
independence."

Kempa said with a cloud of doubt hovering over the country's national
police force, Blair should testify under oath.

"Unfortunately, given that we've got to where we are it should be the
case that Minister Blair gives testimony under oath, if for no other
reason to reassure Canadians who are watching, that there was nothing
untoward," he said.
Calls for House committee investigation

On Wednesday evening, Mendicino said he hadn't spoken to Lucki.

The minister said he will let the commission review the facts.

WATCH | Conservatives continue to press Liberal over claims of
interference in NS shooting investigation
Conservatives continue to press Liberal over claims of interference in
NS shooting investigation
19 hours ago
Duration 1:05
Conservative MP Stephen Ellis questions Emergency Preparedness
Minister Bill Blair over allegations the Liberal government pressed
for details of the shooter's weapons so info could be used as part of
bid for tougher gun laws.

"We look forward to ultimately seeing the report and to working
closely with the commissioners on any recommendations which they might
provide," he said.

Lucki is expected to be called as a witness at the inquiry next month.

    What the RCMP knew and didn't tell the public in days after N.S.
mass shooting

    CBC Investigates
    How the N.S. gunman got his weapons and who may have helped him in Maine

The claims have set off a frenzy on Parliament Hill, including calls
for an emergency debate and a House of Commons committee investigation
to get to the bottom of the allegations.

"This is disgusting to know that the prime minister and his office
would use the death of Canadians for his own political gain," said
Interim Conservative leader Candice Bergen Wednesday

On Thursday NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh called the allegations of federal
interference "deeply troubling."
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Catharine Tunney

Reporter

Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau,
where she covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously
for CBC in Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca

    Follow Cat on Twitter

With files from Blair Rhodes, Elizabeth McMillan and Haley Ryan

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 


 

 




N.S. beekeeper says big company's feeding practices are contaminating his honey

$
0
0

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/beekeeper-oxford-bragg-honey-contamination-1.6520210

 

N.S. beekeeper says big company's feeding practices are contaminating his honey

Bragg Lumber is open-feeding its bees sugar water, which affects the taste of honey

McKee's roadside stand is lined with jars of dark golden honey produced right in his backyard.

This is a busy time for McKee's bees. They're out gathering as much nectar as they can to make honey, usually flying up to three kilometres away to collect nectar from clover, daisies, wild roses and any other flowers they can find. 

But McKee says he and other small-scale honey producers in the province are facing a threat from the beekeeping operations of Bragg Lumber, a division of Oxford Frozen Foods.

The company uses thousands of hives to pollinate its blueberry fields. When the pollination season is over, Bragg disperses some of the hives to various areas of the province.

A carved wooden bear stands near a wood hut with a yellow sign that says Honey. Jars of honey sit on a shelf inside and geraniums in pots sit outside.McKee sells honey from his roadside stand and at local farmers' markets. (Brian MacKay/CBC)

Since Bragg has such a large quantity of bees, it can't rely on wildflower nectar to feed them all. 

McKee said Bragg is open-feeding its bees sugar water using barrels that any bees — including his — can access. The sugar water contaminates the honey, changing its taste and colour.

"I have an acquaintance who did not realize that Oxford's bees were so close and he had water-white honey … because it was basically sugar water. There was very little honey in it," McKee said. "It would have little taste — eating a boiled sweet."

Dozens of bees crawl in and out of an opening at the bottom of a beehive.Bees crawl in and out of one of McKee's hives. (Brian MacKay/CBC)

Bees prefer to consume nectar from flowers, but if the sugar water is more readily available, they'll eat that instead.

"They'll say it's not steak, it's hamburger, but it's OK," said McKee. "And that hive will then stop going out looking for other stuff and go to the sugar barrel because it's easy food."

There's a simple alternative to open-feeding sugar solution, McKee said. An inverted pail with sugar water can be placed directly on top of a hive, so only the bees from that hive can access the water.

Bill McKee holds a white barrel with a hole in the top that is covered by mesh.McKee shows how a pail feeder works. The opening is placed over a hole in the top of the hive so bees from that hive can access the sugar water. (Brian MacKay/CBC)

But when McKee's wife, Helen Sheldon, spoke with the company about the couple's concerns, the company did not seem sympathetic, he said.

"They didn't want to talk to us. They said, no, sorry, this is what we're doing."

The CBC has contacted Bragg Lumber and Oxford Frozen Foods, but has not received a response.

Two jars of honey with the label Belleisle Bees sit for sale on a shelf. Jars of McKee's honey sit for sale at his roadside stand. (Brian MacKay/CBC)

A spokesperson for the provincial Agriculture Department said sugar syrup can lighten the natural colours of honey and dilute its taste, resulting in "adulterated" or "impure" honey.

Sarah Levy MacLeod said for large-scale beekeepers, alternatives to open feeding can be costly.

"It would be a substantial investment for large-scale beekeepers to purchase individual hive feeders for hundreds or thousands of hives," she said in an emailed statement. "The labour and travel requirements to install, fill and re-fill individual hive feeders compared to open feeding are significant."

A row of beehives sit on the ground next to field with tall grass and wildflowers.McKee has about 90 hives in various locations, and his bees produce up to 6,000 pounds of honey each year. (Brian MacKay/CBC)

McKee said most honey producers feed sugar water to their bees starting in late August or September, when fewer nectar sources are in bloom, but open-feeding sugar water so early is a concern.

"There's no laws that says they can do this or can't do that. It's very open and it all depends on everybody shaking hands and following a reasonable expectation, and Bragg is stepping outside that."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Frances Willick is a journalist with CBC Nova Scotia. Please contact her with feedback, story ideas or tips at frances.willick@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

  

54 Comments

 

Bernard Gumble
From the Nova Scotia Beekeepers Association Code of Practice:

Open feeding
• Beekeepers are not to provide bees with unrestricted access to open containers of sugar syrup during the period May 15 to September 15. Doing so presents an unacceptable risk of contaminating honey. ( https://nsbeekeepers.ca/cmsAdmin/uploads/nsba-updated-code-of-practice.pdf )

Bragg Lumber/Oxford Frozen Foods is being a bad neighbour. And lazy: if we can tap a thousand maple trees at a time we can surely fill a hundred closed feeders from a central point.

I trust Bragg/Oxford is not harvesting "honey" from these hives!

 

 

 

June Arnott
Start a FB page calling them out, give their emails addresses etc, everyone can send them notes about how being a good neighbour goes a long way!
 
 
June Arnott
A very bad neighbour! What brand are they under so i dont buy their products
 
 
James Mack
Reply to @June Arnott: Oxford Blueberries./Frozen Foods 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jennifer Janz
Funny that this newcomer from Ontario didn't mention how he's disrupted the existing honey-producing balance in this neighbourhood with his own practices. I certainly won't be purchasing from him.
 
 
John Hammond
Reply to @Jennifer Janz: I've lived here for over 25 years-and I still have neighbours that call me a newcomer. Thankfully most of them have always been more accommodating.

And how does someone with only 90 hives "disrupt an existing honey-producing balance"? Is there an over-population of bees in the area?
 
 
jon Ebbad
Reply to @Jennifer Janz: lol newcomer, Aren't you just a ray of sunshine.
 
 
Brian Brooks
Reply to @Jennifer Janz: You sound like a wonderful person!
 
 
John Munson
Reply to @Jennifer Janz: You've never purchased from him in the past. I am sure he will succeed without your small pittance.
 
 
Scott Arnold
Reply to @Winston Gray: I suspect this is you wish: " ...could use more hateful words ..."

you are not a nice person ...
 
 
Leo Norton
Reply to @Jennifer Janz:
Newcomer, well ain't that sweet?

 

 https://www.facebook.com/groups/122099638404050/?multi_permalinks=1125497374730933&notif_id=1658160683697110&notif_t=group_activity&ref=notif


This content isn't available right now
When this happens, it's usually because the owner only shared it with a small group of people, changed who can see it or it's been deleted.

 

 https://abbonews.com/ns-beekeeper-says-big-companys-feeding-practices-are-contaminating-his-honey-abbo-news/

 

NS beekeeper says big company’s feeding practices are contaminating his honeyABBO News

About Us

Welcome to AbboNews.com your number one source for all things News. We’re dedicated to providing you with the very best of News.

Founded in 2020 by Muhammad Irshad, Abbo News has come a long way from its beginnings in Dera Ismail Khan (KP). When Muhammad Irshad first started out, his passion for “Best, fast, and correct news” drove them to start their own business.

We hope you enjoy our News as much as we enjoy offering them to you. If you have any questions or comments, please don’t hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

[Muhammad Irshad]

Email us: whatisyourquestions@gmail.com

 

 

 http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html

 

 

Tuesday, May 16, 2006

Harper and Bankers

Just Dave

May 10th, 2006
Prime Minister Stephen Harper,
Minister of Public Safety, Stockwell Day,
President of the Treasury Board, John Baird,
Ministers James Flaherty, and Vic Toews
C/o Bill Casey MP
103 Albion Street South,
Amherst, NS, B4H 2X2

Franky Boy McKenna, Deputy Chair,
John Bragg and John Thompson, Directors
Chris Montague Legal Counsel
C/o Jill Crosby, Bank Manager
TD Financial Group
620 Main Street
Sussex, NB, E4E 5L4

W. Geoffrey Beattie, Director
David Allgood, Legal Counsel,
C/o Sharon Armstrong, Bank Manager
Royal Bank of Canada
644 Main Street
Sussex, NB, E4E 7H9

John Manley PC, Director and
E. Jennifer Warren, Legal Counsel
C/o Maria Cormie, Bank Manager
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
761 Main St,
Moncton, NB. E1C 1E5

RE: Blowing the whistle on big banks and corrupt politicians too.

Hey,

Former Mountie testifies neighbour never reported N.S. mass shooter's domestic violence

$
0
0
 
 

MCC Day 49 – Another Panel Discussion on Mass Casualties, IPV, GBV and Family Violence

327 views
Jul 18, 2022
663 subscribers
After the drama of last week, which concluded with the (unsatisfactory) appearance of Lisa Banfield, the MCC has turned back to the monotony of further discussion panels for the week ahead, with an interlude tomorrow to hear from a police witness and examine Gabriel Wortman’s “financial misdealings”. The focus of today’s “roundtable” was “Mass Casualties, IPV, GBV and Family Violence: Exploring the Connections”. 
 
Most of what was discussed today has been covered in previous discussions on domestic, gender-based, and family violence. Generally, the panelists support treating this violence as a something akin to a public health response, as opposed to private matters. This leads to recommendations to have more resources dedicated to housing, counseling, and financial supports, as well as a shift in public attitudes towards victims of violence. 
 
As has been the case with other panel discussions and expert witnesses, a viewer who may have somehow stumbled upon this discussion would have had difficulty figuring out that it was being held in the context of an inquiry into a specific mass shooting. Certainly, there was no reference to Gabriel Wortman, Lisa Banfied, or any other individuals involved in the events of the April 18-19, 2020 mass casualty events. 
 
It raises questions as to the role of the Commissioners, and the use of the limited time allotted to the MCC. In a civil trial, where an issue arises that might be beyond the expected knowledge or intuitive abilities of the presiding judge, an expert (or, often, two competing experts) may be brought in to shed some light on the matter, after which the presiding judge uses their analytical skills to make a determination about the specific situation before them. 
 
Here, there have been over a dozen experts who have been speaking about the issues around domestic and intimate partner violence, who have seemingly been trying to cover the entire possible spectrum of issues on those topics, regardless of whether there is a connection to the events of the mass casualty being studied. 
 
The presumption behind the heavy volume of expertise on these issues of domestic violence seems to be that it is so unintuitive that these three Commissioners could not possibly come to their own conclusions, and require this high level of guidance in order to understand what is happening, and what needs to happen. That strikes me as a very low level of expectations to have for the three, supposedly highly qualified, Commissioners. 
 
The other possibility is that the time spent is seen to be somehow valuable in educating the public on issues of domestic and intimate partner violence, and that this will help address the identified issues around public attitudes around such violence. If that is the goal, the low level of public engagement on days were these panels have been featured would suggest it was an ill-conceived objective. 
 
There is limited time for the MCC to do it’s work and prepare a report with persuasive recommendations. Each day that is used for a discussion panel to aid the Commissioners or educate the public is a day that is not used to examine witnesses or deal with issues such as cross-border smuggling or criminal intelligence capabilities. These are all choices that the MCC is making. 
 
Tomorrow will be more relevant. There will be a witness, Cst. Troy Maxwell, who was identified as the officer to whom Brenda Forbes spoke regarding Lisa Banfield and Wortman’s ownership of illegal firearms. There will also be a presentation on Wortman’s financial misdealings. It will be interesting to see if there is a discussion of his connections to illegal activities, or whether it will be limited to cash dealings with denturist clients.
 
David Amos
Say Hey to your buddies Palango, Douglas and Bonaparte for me will ya?
 
 
 
 
 
 

Former Mountie testifies neighbour never reported N.S. mass shooter's domestic violence

Troy Maxwell is speaking before the public inquiry Tuesday via video

Troy Maxwell testified Tuesday via video at the public inquiry led by the Mass Casualty Commission into the shooting deaths of 22 people on April 18 and 19, 2020.

Maxwell, now retired after 21 years with the Mounties, has previously confirmed he was the responding officer from Bible Hill detachment assigned to handle the call from neighbour Brenda Forbes on July 6, 2013.

"If I'm being completely honest, the lack of notes shows me that this was a first-instance file. Because any time you have anything that you're going to be investigating, there would be way more information than that," Maxwell told the commission Tuesday.

He said a first-instance file is one that is concluded without taking any further investigative steps, and is handled very differently from a report of domestic violence.

Forbes has repeatedly told media outlets, RCMP, the commission in interviews and in-person testimony last week, that she told the Mounties about how the gunman, Gabriel Wortman, had choked his partner Lisa Banfield near their Portapique cottage.

She and her husband lived in Portapique at the time. Forbes said she'd heard about the assault from the gunman's uncle, Glynn Wortman, who saw it for himself. Forbes also said Glynn told her another neighbour, Richard Ellison, was also there.

During her talk with the officers at her workplace in Debert, Forbes said she told them the gunman also had illegal firearms and never had a gun licence. She also said she called Glynn and put him on speaker phone in front of the RCMP, but he refused to cooperate because he was worried the gunman would kill him.

"The RCMP heard all of that," Forbes told police soon after the mass shooting.

The officers then told Forbes there wasn't much they could do without Banfield "because we don't have her side of the story. And … with the weapons and stuff … we have no proof," Forbes said.

She added that the RCMP "never" followed up, and nothing ever came of the complaint.

Brenda Forbes, left, with her husband George. Forbes says she tried to tell police about Gabriel Wortman's abuse of his partner, and that he had illegal guns in his home, but that police did not investigate. (CBC)

But on Tuesday, Maxwell said he did not hear Forbes put Glynn on speaker phone, she never mentioned anything about an assault on Banfield and recalled the order of their meetings differently.

He said the complaint came through their Operational Communications Centre (OCC), containing details about someone "being belligerent" as they drove around Portapique.

Maxwell said he then called Forbes to get more information on her complaint which is when he would have taken down some notes.

One page of Maxwell's handwritten notes relates to Forbes' complaint, which include the names of Brenda Forbes, Glynn Wortman, and Richard Ellison, as well as the gunman's name and address. The word "Lisa" is in brackets on one side of the page.

Maxwell said Tuesday he doesn't know who Ellison and Glynn Wortman are, or why he wrote their names down. When asked about Lisa, he said "I don't know why it's there."

Former RCMP officer Troy Maxwell, when stationed in Bible Hill, N.S., made one page of notes about the meeting with Brenda Forbes in July 2013 detailing names of neighbours in Portapique and the gunman's partner. Forbes has said she told the RCMP at the time about the gunman's abuse of his common-law spouse Lisa Banfield, but Maxwell said Forbes complained about him speeding in the community. (Mass Casualty Commission)

For his next step, Maxwell said he recalls visiting the gunman's Portapique cottage around dusk the same day the complaint came in with another officer. They knocked on the door, but no one responded so they left.

He repeated Tuesday that if a domestic assault had been mentioned, there would have been more planning in how they approached that "high-risk" visit. 

Maxwell told the commission earlier this year that he remembers Forbes's complaint being about the gunman driving too fast around the neighbourhood "in an old, decommissioned police car."

Banfield has said the gunman did not own a decommissioned police car in 2013. He did buy four decommissioned Ford Taurus vehicles years later in 2019, and turned one into a fully marked replica RCMP cruiser that he used in the rampage.

When commission counsel Emily Hill asked Tuesday whether that information changed his mind, Maxwell said no — since he'd seen an older Crown Victoria, a model also use by police forces, on the gunman's property.

"In my mind there was definitely a Crown Vic backed in at that yard. There was another vehicle behind it, and there was a vehicle off to the side … that was damaged," Maxwell said.

The Portapique, N.S. log cottage belonging to the Nova Scotia mass shooter. The building, and nearby warehouse, were burned to the ground during the April 2020 rampage. (Mass Casualty Commission)

During this visit, Maxwell said he remembers speaking to some of Wortman's neighbours which would have fit with police "best practice." He couldn't remember who he met, but said one of them may have been in the military and had a "slim" build.

At some point within the next five days, Maxwell said he called the gunman to inform him of the vehicle complaint. He does not remember whether he spoke to him directly, but does recall leaving a message on his answering machine, Maxwell said Tuesday.

Maxwell also said he didn't remember how he got the gunman's phone number, but recalled it being related to an address in Dartmouth or Halifax.

Finally, Maxwell said Tuesday, he remembers visiting Forbes at her Debert workplace to tell her about the steps he'd taken, and how the file was being closed. He said he didn't remember how Forbes reacted.

Banfield told the commission last week that she never knew Forbes made a report to police in 2013, but confirmed what Forbes described did happen. 

After Forbes started speaking out about her complaint in the wake of the mass shooting, and how she'd tried to warn neighbours about the gunman, the Nova Scotia RCMP looked into their files.

That's when Maxwell turned in his one page of notes. Although the RCMP regularly purge old files, they were able to recover some details about Forbes' July 2013 complaint. 

It was dispatched as "causing of disturbance" and later concluded as "assist to general public," RCMP documents show.

The term assist to general public would apply to "very minor thing," Maxwell told the commission earlier, like speeding or someone driving a bike on the wrong side of the road.

Domestic violence would have led to different investigation: Maxwell

If Forbes' had told him anything about domestic violence, even second-hand, Maxwell has said he would have made note of it and it would have been flagged to superior officers. He previously said they would have taken separate statements from the gunman and Banfield. 

"My mother was abused as a child, so I did not take anything like that with a grain of salt, and it definitely would have been handled in a completely different manner than the notes you see," Maxwell said in his earlier commission interview.

If no one had been home when police arrived investigating domestic violence, Maxwell said Tuesday they would have returned to Portapique or asked other officers to check other properties until they found the suspect and victim.

The same day of Forbes's complaint, records show Maxwell conducted a check on the perpetrator using the Canadian Police Information Centre database, to see if he had any guns or concerning prior police interactions "to make sure that when we arrived we were safe."

By that time, the gunman had been reported to RCMP twice: first in 2010 after threatening to kill his parents, and then in 2011 that he wanted to "kill a cop."

On Tuesday, Hill pointed out a document that appears to show the OCC made the check into CPIC on his behalf about Wortman. Maxwell agreed that would likely have been the case since the communications centre checking into suspects and addresses was routine.

Banfield has said no police member ever interviewed her about possible domestic abuse before the mass shooting.

"Knowing that there was all these complaints … why didn't anybody even try to approach me? I've never had a police officer even ask me anything as far as my well-being or has he ever done anything to me," Banfield said in a commission interview.

The commission has said RCMP Const. Greg Wiley, who did visit the gunman's cottage to ask about firearms after the 2010 complaint, will testify at a later date yet to be announced.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Haley Ryan

Reporter

Haley Ryan is a reporter based in Halifax. Got a story idea? Send an email to haley.ryan@cbc.ca, or reach out on Twitter @hkryan17.





243 Comments
 
 
 
Den Garrison
Hmmm, if the complaint played out the way Brenda Forbes said it played out, you would expect to see the names of Wortman's uncle and friend, and Wortman's common law partner in the officer's notes. If it played out the way the officer said it did, why are all those other names in his notes when he was dealing with Wortman speeding through the neighbourhood? 
 
 
 
Michael Jackson
"But on Tuesday, Maxwell said he did not hear Forbes put Glynn on speaker phone, she never mentioned anything about an assault on Banfield and recalled the order of their meetings differently."
--------------------------------
Okay, but doesn't that mean that essentially someone is lying? Then, the question for me would be---what motivation would the Forbes's have for lying about this now? If they did not actually tell the police anything at the time, why would they now lie and say they did?

Because how could they know for sure the police didn't have proof of what they said at the time---like maybe one of the police officers had a body cam or was using a recording device of some kind---and simply show that evidence, thus proving those two folks to be mischief-makers at the least.

But not only are the police unable to provide such evidence of their version of events, they barely have anything at all related to the report. Which would be odd if the Forbes's version is correct, because police are not known for dismissing reports of violence and illegal weapons.

So, what could it be? Well, here is a quote from a Macleans article:

"The withdrawal of $475,000 in cash by the man who killed 22 Nova Scotians in April matches the method the RCMP uses to send money to confidential informants and agents, sources say."

"A Mountie familiar with the techniques used by the force in undercover operations, but not with the details of the investigation into the shooting, says Wortman could not have collected his own money from Brink’s as a private citizen.

“There’s no way a civilian can just make an arrangement like that,” he said in an interview.

He added that Wortman’s transaction is consistent with the Mountie’s experience in how the RCMP pays its assets. "
 
 
 
 
Anthony Gracey
So why were Ellison and Uncle Wortman in your notes if what Forbes is saying is false? He was one hostile witness imo.  
 
James Robson 
CBC does not want you to read editor Tim Bousquet's Halifax Examiner commentary last week concerning the glaring inconsistencies in what this RCMP recalls from 2013. Do it for some sense of honesty.
 
Bob Haagensen
Reply to @James Robson: There are very few reliable news sources any more. CBC isn't one of them. If you want reliable, in-your-face local news, read Halifax Examiner. If you want the same on an international level, look at Aljazeera
 
James Robson
Reply to @James Robson: CBC is an excellent news source - I come here often for news and insights you don't usually get from for-profit news orgs.
Don't know about the Examiner, but Frank Magazine has tons of info and analysis that is comprehensive and insightful
 
Paul North
Reply to @Bob Haagensen:
Yet here you are...
 
Bob Haagensen
Reply to @Paul North: Moth to a flame - can't help myself.
 
James Robson
Reply to @Paul North:
Read both for a better sense of the disconnect between the somewhat bleached narrative of msm and what independent media know now and in the case of the embarrassingly honest little HE was exposing within days of this terrible massacre. There have been far too many powerful political players involved in this huge case--few or any of which/whom ever wanted exposure of the actual details in any official public inquiry and consequently they dragged their feet until the pressure grew too great. And still there is no guarantee that all of the sordid facts will be washed in public.
 
James Robson
Reply to @Paul North:
For over two years and most other msm only provided a gloss of the massacre details. Therefore, the msm narrative reads very differently from the highly-connected and politically embarrassing details often published by the Halifax Examiner.
 
 
 
 
 
Robert Furlong
Here's what happened. He duped them into thinking he was on their side, an informant.
When what he was doing was laughing at them and taking great pride in their gullibility and they can't admit that they were played for fools.
 
James Robson
Reply to @Robert Furlong:
The real question is, was he a sometimes paid RCMP informant?
 
 
 
 
 
 
Shelley King Smith
For some reason the relaying of a very, very unflattering case of domestic abuse that I personally know about ( a relative was the v i c t i m) and how a certain police force handled it has been deactivated, no names were used other than that of a certain police force. No bad language, nothing and it was a personal account of what I knew. hmmmm
 
Bob Haagensen
Reply to @Shelley King Smith: It's the CBC way. Anything that even comes close to politically incorrect or doesn't align with CBC's editorial position gets shut down.
 
James Robson
Reply to @Bob Haagensen:
That editorial position is best described as pablum for mass consumption,
 
 
 
 
 
Video unavailable
This video is private
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 17, 2022

Unlisted

1,120 views
Streamed live 3 hours ago
7.51K subscribers
Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice memo at nighttimepodcast.com/contact 
 
Links: the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova... 
 Buy 22 Murders by Paul Palango: https://www.amazon.ca/22-Murders-Inve... 
Provide feedback and comments on the episode: nighttimepodcast.com/contact 
Musical Theme: Noir Toyko by Monty Datta 
Contact: 
David Amos
Methinks I should save this before it goes "Poof" N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 17, 2022 - Weekly updates (with Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers)

In this double header episode, I'll be joined by both Paul Palango and Adam Rodgers to discuss the past week’s public inquiry hearings, respond to listener voice memos, and discuss recent updates in this ever evolving story.

Listen to the Aftershow  

In this post show discussion I'm joined by Scott MacLeod (brother of Sean MacLeod) and Darrell Currie (Deputy Fire Chief of Onslow Belmont F

 

Episode Links:

the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova-scotia-rampage

Join the Nova Scotia Mass Casualty Discussion Group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/novascotiamasscasualty

Send a tip related to this case: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/contact

Send a voicememo to the show:

nighttimepodcast.com/contact

 
 

MCC - DAY 51 - LEAF, CFOJA AND MONASH

69 watching now
Started streaming 2 hours ago
3.42K subscribers
 
 

MCC - DAY 51 - ... JOHN AND NANCY HUDSON'S STATEMENTS

814 views
Streamed live 17 hours ago
3.42K subscribers
 
 
 
 
 
 

N.S. mass shooter had a history of financial 'misdealing,' according to new documents

$
0
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MZSmalDV4U&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells 

 

MCC - DAY 54 -

389 views
Streamed live 6 hours ago
3.43K subscribers
 
David Amos
You have another couple of emails from me and one of them contained my private cell number correct?

 

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YT4la9sXiw&ab_channel=AdamRodgers

 

MCC Day 50 – Perpetrator Financial Misdealings and RCMP Officer Misrememberings

333 views
Jul 19, 2022
666 subscribers
The Mass Casualty Commission took a welcome break from academic discussion panels today to explore evidence about the finances of the killer, and to hear from an RCMP officer who dealt with the complaint from Brenda Forbes, which she described in her evidence last week. The financial misdealings Foundational Document gave a window into the degree of illegal activity in which Gabriel Wortman was engaged, while Cst. Troy Maxwell’s testimony forced us to choose between two starkly different versions of a key event. 
 
David Amos
Dwayne KingSenior Manager, Grant ThorntonDwayne is a member of Grant Thornton’s AML Advisory. Prior to working at Grant Thornton Dwayne managed a team of 26 investigators as part of the Global Anti-Money Laundering Department for TD Bank. Dwayne also has 26 years of experience in Law Enforcement which includes over 8 years investigating Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime. Dwayne is a court qualified Money Laundering expert. He has received his designation as an Advanced Financial Crimes Investigative Specialist (CAMS – FCI), a Certified Anti Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS), a Certified Financial Crimes Specialists (CFCS) and a Certified Bitcoin Professional (CBP).


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wk0jA9Ejyw8&lc=Ugz9wWdvNIQEzq7eMGB4AaABAg.9dha9D6EPC69di4oj4bZV7

 

MCC - DAY 52 - THE BRENDA CALL... TROY MAXWELL & WORTMAN'S FINANCES

1,412 views
Streamed live on Jul 19, 2022
3.43K subscribers
Troy Maxwell's Notes July 6, 2013: https://masscasualtycommission.ca/fil... 
 
Troy Maxwell MCC interview transcript (No audio or video): https://masscasualtycommission.ca/fil... 
 
 

31 Comments

David Amos
You should have followed the money like Palango and I did long ago
 
Highlighted reply
robert thomas
where is the money David?
 
David Amos
 @robert thomas  Perhaps we should talk??? "If anybody finds this I would hope to impress on them the importance of doing what is right when it still matters and can save lives. I waited 20 days. Too late to be proactive. Don't wait for an authority for permission to speak."
 
David Amos
Are you the Retired dude who was teasing me today???
 
robert thomas
 @David Amos  that wasn't me.. I'm still working! So serious question then. You brought it up and suggest that you are smarter than the average bear.. so where is the money?
 
David Amos
 @robert thomas  Ask the bears you admire
 
David Amos
 @robert thomas  BTW are you the Robert Thomas dude who works for the CRA?
 
robert thomas
 @David Amos  No I work for a rebar company
  
David Amos
 @robert thomas  So why did you pick a fight with me today of all days?
 
robert thomas
 @David Amos  You are the one casting aspersions. I don't get it. Just wondering if you have some information that I don't.
 
David Amos
 @robert thomas  I repeat take it up with the RCMP
 
David Amos
 @robert thomas  The email I got from Palango last night that I forwarded to your hero Seamus would be a fine place to start
 
Highlighted reply
robert thomas
 @David Amos  Where did you read that Seamus is my hero? Why the vitriol? 
  
I don't get it.  
 
Everyone here on this channel is striving to find the find the truth where ever it can be found. By the way you started all this by claiming that you knew something more than everyone else.  
 
And maybe you do. 
 
All I wanted to know was where the money is that only you and Mr. Palango know of right now. And further I don't have access to LGC's email account. How could I? Do you think I am a spy or something? How am I supposed to know what you are talking about. Seriously man! You are being a troll.. 
 
Why? 
 
I doesn't make sense to me when we should all be on the same side when it comes to this tragedy. I have a day job and don't have time to explore everything in detail. If you have information please share.  
 
As far as Palango goes the fact is that I follow him too! Does that in and of itself make him a hero in my eyes as well.  
 
Anyways have a nice life!
 
David Amos
 @robert thomas "You are being a troll."Hmmm It has been my experience to understand that when somebody accuses you of being something that is exactly what they are
.
robert thomas
 @David Amos  Listen man! you started this.. You are being a troll. And yeah by engaging you I have become one as well. My bad I guess. Have a nice life!
 
David Amos
 @robert thomas "Don't wait for an authority for permission to speak."Methinks I should call every dude in the Nova Scotia phone book who shares your name so they can hear an old pissed off Maritimer's voice N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 
 
 
David Amos
PAUL PALANGO was born in Hamilton, Ontario and earned a degree in journalism from Carleton University. He has worked at the Hamilton Spectator (1974-1976), covered the Toronto Blue Jays in their first season for the Toronto Sun (1977), and worked at the Globe and Mail from 1977 to 1990 as City Editor and National Editor. In 1993, he began work as a fraud investigator for a leading forensic accounting firm, which allowed him to see the justice system from a unique perspective. In that capacity, he traveled extensively around North America investigating fraud, including an arson investigation in Saskatchewan, in which he helped the Mounties there focus on the likely perpetrator, who eventually was convicted and went to prison.
 
 
 
 
Underestimate at your peril
God wins and those who come against Him and His people shall be scattered to the winds like chaff.
 
 
 
 
 
brickleberry
I’m catching up on some missed parts and can’t get over how she is grilling this officer over their DV narrative. Disgusting.
 
 
 
 
 
 
David Amos
Dwayne King Senior Manager, Grant Thornton Dwayne is a member of Grant Thornton’s AML Advisory. Prior to working at Grant Thornton Dwayne managed a team of 26 investigators as part of the Global Anti-Money Laundering Department for TD Bank. Dwayne also has 26 years of experience in Law Enforcement which includes over 8 years investigating Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime. Dwayne is a court qualified Money Laundering expert. He has received his designation as an Advanced Financial Crimes Investigative Specialist (CAMS – FCI), a Certified Anti Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS), a Certified Financial Crimes Specialists (CFCS) and a Certified Bitcoin Professional (CBP).
 
 
David Amos
Dwayne King and his buddies in the PCO must recall this exchange 
 
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:10:52 +0000 
Subject: Your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes - 2017-02631 
  
Mr. David Raymond Amos 
 
Dear Mr. Amos:

Thank you for your various correspondence about abusive tax schemes, and for your understanding regarding the delay of this response.

This is an opportunity for me to address your concerns about the way the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) deals with aggressive tax planning, tax avoidance, and tax evasion by targeting individuals and groups that promote schemes intended to avoid payment of tax. It is also an opportunity for me to present the Government of Canada’s main strategies for ensuring fairness for all taxpayers.

The CRA’s mission is to preserve the integrity of Canada’s tax system, and it is taking concrete and effective action to deal with abusive tax schemes. Through federal budget funding in 2016 and 2017, the government has committed close to $1 billion in cracking down on tax evasion and combatting tax avoidance at home and through the use of offshore transactions. This additional funding is expected to generate federal revenues of $2.6 billion over five years for Budget 2016, and $2.5 billion over five years for Budget 2017.

More precisely, the CRA is cracking down on tax cheats by hiring more auditors, maintaining its underground economy specialist teams, increasing coverage of aggressive goods and service tax/harmonized sales tax planning, increasing coverage of multinational corporations and wealthy individuals, and taking targeted actions aimed at promoters of abusive tax schemes.

On the offshore front, the CRA continues to develop tools to improve its focus on high‑risk taxpayers. It is also considering changes to its Voluntary Disclosures Program following the first set of program
recommendations received from an independent Offshore Compliance Advisory Committee. In addition, the CRA is leading international projects to address the base erosion and profit shifting initiative of the G20 and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, and is collaborating with treaty partners to address the Panama Papers leaks.

These actions are evidence of the government’s commitment to protecting tax fairness. The CRA has strengthened its intelligence and technical capacities for the early detection of abusive tax
arrangements and deterrence of those who participate in them. To ensure compliance, it has increased the number of actions aimed at promoters who use illegal schemes. These measures include increased
audits of such promoters, improved information gathering, criminal investigations where warranted, and better communication with taxpayers.

To deter potential taxpayer involvement in these schemes, the CRA is increasing notifications and warnings through its communications products. It also seeks partnerships with tax preparers, accountants, and community groups so that they can become informed observers who can educate their clients.

The CRA will assess penalties against promoters and other representatives who make false statements involving illegal tax schemes. The promotion of tax schemes to defraud the government can lead to criminal investigations, fingerprinting, criminal prosecution, court fines, and jail time.

Between April 1, 2011, and March 31, 2016, the CRA’s criminal investigations resulted in the conviction of 42 Canadian taxpayers for tax evasion with links to money and assets held offshore. In total, the $34 million in evaded taxes resulted in court fines of $12 million and 734 months of jail time.

When deciding to pursue compliance actions through the courts, the CRA consults the Department of Justice Canada to choose an appropriate solution. Complex tax-related litigation is costly and time consuming, and the outcome may be unsuccessful. All options to recover amounts owed are considered.

More specifically, in relation to the KPMG Isle of Man tax avoidance scheme, publicly available court records show that it is through the CRA’s efforts that the scheme was discovered. The CRA identified many of the participants and continues to actively pursue the matter. The CRA has also identified at least 10 additional tax structures on the Isle of Man, and is auditing taxpayers in relation to these
structures.

To ensure tax fairness, the CRA commissioned an independent review in March 2016 to determine if it had acted appropriately concerning KPMG and its clients. In her review, Ms. Kimberley Brooks, Associate Professor and former Dean of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University, examined the CRA’s operational processes and decisions in relation to the KPMG offshore tax structure and its efforts to obtain the names of all taxpayers participating in the scheme. Following this review, the report, released on May 5, 2016, concluded that the CRA had acted appropriately in its management of the KPMG Isle of Man file. The report found that the series of compliance measures the CRA took were in accordance with its policies and procedures. It was concluded that the procedural actions taken on the KPMG file were appropriate given the facts of this particular case and were consistent with the treatment of taxpayers in similar situations. The report concluded that actions by CRA employees were in accordance with the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct. There was no evidence of inappropriate interaction between KPMG and the CRA employees involved in the case.

Under the CRA’s Code of Integrity and Professional Conduct, all CRA employees are responsible for real, apparent, or potential conflicts of interests between their current duties and any subsequent
employment outside of the CRA or the Public Service of Canada. Consequences and corrective measures play an important role in protecting the CRA’s integrity.

The CRA takes misconduct very seriously. The consequences of misconduct depend on the gravity of the incident and its repercussions on trust both within and outside of the CRA. Misconduct can result in
disciplinary measures up to dismissal.

All forms of tax evasion are illegal. The CRA manages the Informant Leads Program, which handles leads received from the public regarding cases of tax evasion across the country. This program, which
coordinates all the leads the CRA receives from informants, determines whether there has been any non-compliance with tax law and ensures that the information is examined and conveyed, if applicable, so that compliance measures are taken. This program does not offer any reward for tips received.

The new Offshore Tax Informant Program (OTIP) has also been put in place. The OTIP offers financial compensation to individuals who provide information related to major cases of offshore tax evasion that lead to the collection of tax owing. As of December 31, 2016, the OTIP had received 963 calls and 407 written submissions from possible informants. Over 218 taxpayers are currently under audit based on
information the CRA received through the OTIP.

With a focus on the highest-risk sectors nationally and internationally and an increased ability to gather information, the CRA has the means to target taxpayers who try to hide their income. For example, since January 2015, the CRA has been collecting information on all international electronic funds transfers (EFTs) of $10,000 or more ending or originating in Canada. It is also adopting a proactive approach by focusing each year on four jurisdictions that raise suspicion. For the Isle of Man, the CRA audited 3,000 EFTs totalling $860 million over 12 months and involving approximately 800 taxpayers. Based on these audits, the CRA communicated with approximately 350 individuals and 400 corporations and performed 60 audits.

In January 2017, I reaffirmed Canada’s important role as a leader for tax authorities around the world in detecting the structures used for aggressive tax planning and tax evasion. This is why Canada works daily with the Joint International Tax Shelter Information Centre (JITSIC), a network of tax administrations in over 35 countries. The CRA participates in two expert groups within the JITSIC and leads the working group on intermediaries and proponents. This ongoing collaboration is a key component of the CRA’s work to develop strong relationships with the international community, which will help it refine the world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians.

The CRA is increasing its efforts and is seeing early signs of success. Last year, the CRA recovered just under $13 billion as a result of its audit activities on the domestic and offshore fronts. Two-thirds of these recoveries are the result of its audit efforts relating to large businesses and multinational companies.

But there is still much to do, and additional improvements and investments are underway.

Tax cheats are having a harder and harder time hiding. Taxpayers who choose to promote or participate in malicious and illegal tax strategies must face the consequences of their actions. Canadians expect nothing less. I invite you to read my most recent statement on this matter at canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/news/2017/03/ statement_from_thehonourabledianelebouthillierministerofnational.

Thank you for taking the time to write. I hope the information I have provided is helpful.

Sincerely,

The Honourable Diane Lebouthillier
Minister of National Revenue
 
 
 
 
 
 

Joanne Willoughby
Finally home, time to watch. Hello everyone
 
 
 
 
 
CON-CAN
I feel that the lawyers actually cross examining this witness illustrates that they are capable of asking good question, but that they aren't allowed to for the most part. There has to be a reason to badger a witness like that.
 
Peter Byker
Yet, they call them "findings" when they're done! Ridiculous. All we've found are more questions.
 
David Amos
YO Tara perhaps you should call me now?
 
 
 
 
 
brickleberry
Why was That family’s lawyer so mad?? I’m so confused
 
 
 
 
 
Ken Triol
I look forward to the comments and I just couldn't make them work on this one. I have no idea why.
 
 
 
 
 
Joanne Willoughby
Shoot, live chat is not available
 
Peter Byker
I'm rewatching a lot of this, what a day! Thanks for your interest ❤ 
 
Hopefully it is working now...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-z_c_RVGIw8&t=199s

 

The Westray Coal Mine Explosion and Aftermath

713 views
Nov 10, 2017
9 subscribers
Just posting for history's. sake. It isn't a great speech and I will be first to admit that. Problem I had is I was talking to a computer screen and all I could see was the video feed of myself. Still all in all I think it shows well my progression from what was once something very difficult to address without breaking down to now a place where I can finally remove myself somewhat from the scene. Look at it from the Third Eye. 
 
If anybody finds this I would hope to impress on them the importance of doing what is right when it still matters and can save lives. I waited 20 days. Too late to be proactive. 
 
Don't wait for an authority for permission to speak.
 


 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgvIGBOE9v4&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells


MCC - DAY 53 - MORE SLOP... TIME TO RESEARCH ?

484 views
Streamed live 8 hours ago

3.43K subscribers
 

7 Comments

David Amos
I remember dealing with a certain RCMP member named Maloney and her lawyers long ago 
 

Accused killer stays free to await ruling

The Province
Thursday, January 29, 2004
By Suzanne Fournier

 

Former American Indian Movement activist John Graham walked away fromcourtyesterday still a free man.

Graham, a 48-year-old father of eight who has lived in Vancouver since1999,smiled in relief and hugged his supporters as he left the B.C. Courtof Appealfollowing a bid by federal Crown prosecutor Deborah Strachan torevoke the bail he was granted Jan. 16.

B.C. Court of Appeal Justice Risa Levine reserved her decision.

Strachan argued Graham could "choose to go underground again" and disappear.

Graham said outside court he has refused to hide and that U.S. agents haveinterviewed him many times over the last decade.

"The only political movement I've been involved in for 20 years is thelives of my children and my loved ones," said Graham. "I'm not goinganywhere I need to clear up these rumours that have been hanging over mefor years."

Graham, a Yukon native of the Champagne and Aishihk band, is accused of the28-year-old murder of Nova Scotia Mik'maq Anna Mae Pictou Aquash, whowasshot in the back of the head in December 1975 in what Strachan called a"cold-blooded execution-style" killing on the Pine Ridge reservation inSouth Dakota.

The U.S. is seeking Graham's extradition to face a murder charge in SouthDakota, where co-accused Arlo Looking Cloud has fingered Graham as thetriggerman.

Graham's accusers say he was ordered by AIM leaders to execute Aquash as asuspected informant.

Graham says he has disavowed AIM's goals and its male leaders, who he saidbecame "macho Hollywood Indians."

Graham was arrested in Vancouver Dec. 2 and released on stringent bailconditions requiring a $10,000 surety from each of five people and housearrest at an east-side residence.

Graham's lawyer, Terry LaLiberte, told Levine there is "not one tittle offorensicevidence" to link Graham to the killing of Aquash. He said theU.S. case relieslargely on "hearsay" evidence "that we can prove isincorrect."

Tuma T. W. Young, a Mik'maq lawyer and University of B.C. doctoral studentrepresenting Aquash's two adult daughters, Denise Pictou Maloney of Torontoand Debbie Pictou Maloney, a Nova Scotia RCMP officer, said that "naturallythe sisters would prefer certainty that [Graham] will show up in court sothey can get a fair hearing."

"To the sisters, this is about solving their mother's brutal murder afterall these years it's not about AIM leaders, though they should be heldresponsible if they ordered her death, or about blaming the FBI. An agencydoesn't shoot a defenceless woman, a person does, and we want him broughtto justice."
sfournier@png.canwest.com

© The Vancouver Province 2004

 

David Amos
I MUST SAY YOU PICKED A BAD DAY TO PLAY DUMB
 
 
 
 
cyndi
Shediac has a new facility for abused women but also has every program running for abusers, to help them, I always believed once a women beater/abuser always one!
 
tinycha0s
I feel like it’s easy to assume that until you are in a situation where you need to defend yourself and end up being called the aggressor….. Theres two sides to every story.The way they do it, it favours the person who calls the police, the “victim” is whoever can be more convincing. The system is broken. Beyond.
 
cyndi
 @tinycha0s  I've lived thru way more than lb abuse, she had it made! Compare to some, I know you can get away if you really really want to as well!!! Do people change for the better??? Hopefully but who wants to stick around and find out????
 
cyndi
Gabe wasn't my abuser(s) !!!
 

 


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/mcc-gunman-financial-misdealing-1.6524385

 

N.S. mass shooter had a history of financial 'misdealing,' according to new documents

Gunman’s partner said he ‘wasn’t claiming what he actually made’

The financial history of the gunman who killed 22 people in Nova Scotia in 2020 is dotted with red flags, but few were passed on or picked up by authorities until after his rampage, according to new documents tabled as part of the inquiry looking into the tragedy.

The latest foundational document from the Mass Casualty Commission looks at Gabriel Wortman's suspicious banking activity, improper billing practices and an eventually aborted plan to defraud a federal immigration program.

"The evidence described below suggests the perpetrator amassed money and other assets through a number of illegitimate or suspicious means," notes the commission.

"While there are no definitive answers about the sources of all his income, there is a clear pattern of misdealing."

Living beyond reported income 

As part of its investigation into the shooting, the RCMP commissioned a report from federal financial investigators to review the gunman's finances and those of his common-law spouse Lisa Banfield.

The financial review report said that between 2012 and 2019 the gunman reported an average annual income of $39,916 from his business, the Atlantic Denture Clinic. The commission's report said that worked out to $29,036 in disposable income.

But the Department of Community Services said the gunman's clinic received $434,406 between 2015 to 2020 in provincial funds to deliver services to clients receiving Employment Support and Income Assistance, and those in the Disability Support Program.

"The perpetrator obviously underreported his income," said commission lawyer Ronke Akinyemi on Tuesday.

The review noted that in addition to his salary an additional $232,907 was deposited in his personal accounts and another $96,753 was dropped into the joint account he held with Banfield during that period.

Dwayne King, the commission's lead financial investigator, said the gunman's spending habits and lifestyle exceeded his reported income.

For example, from December 2017 to May 2020 the perpetrator spent nearly $20,000 on PayPal and just over $23,000 on the GCSurplus site. — about 87 per cent of his reported disposable income. 

King also noted a mismatch in the amount Banfield was spending compared with her declared annual average salary of $15,288.

In an interview with the commission, Banfield said the gunman "wasn't claiming what he actually made" from his denture clinic. She described how she would collect cash from patients and, at the end of the day, would take it to the residence the couple shared above the clinic. 

Banfield said she would also cash cheques patients made out to the gunman and give the money to him. She said the gunman told patients to make cheques out to him versus the clinic. 

According to the report the couple filed their taxes as "single," despite living together for 19 years.

Banfield told a commission lawyer she didn't know why that was the case. The tax returns were prepared by a bookkeeper and not an accountant.The former is not obliged to report to the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC). 

Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the 2020 Nova Scotia murders in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. In an interview with the commission, Banfield said the gunman “wasn’t claiming what he actually made” from his denture clinic. (The Canadian Press/Andrew Vaughan)

The commission said there is also evidence to suggest the gunman was claiming personal purchases on his CIBC Visa card as business-related expenses.

The Canada Revenue Agency wouldn't say whether the federal agency was aware of the gunman's suspicious filings. 

"In order to ensure the integrity of our work and to respect the confidentiality provisions of the acts we administer, the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) does not comment on investigations that it may or may not have undertaken," said spokesperson Hannah Wardell in an email to CBC News.

Investigation turns up improper billing 

In 2005 the Denturist Licensing Board of Nova Scotia launched an investigation into the perpetrator for improper billing and to follow up on allegations he was aggressive with patients.

The board's records show the gunman had a practice of billing the insurance provider the full amount of the fee but only charging the patient the portion that was covered by their insurance, resulting in a discount for the patient. Two insurance companies told the board they felt the practice could be seen as fraudulent.

The gunman said he didn't realize the practice was wrong and signed a settlement agreement in 2007 with the board. 

Cash found on property 

When police combed the burned-out grounds of the gunman's cottage following the mass shooting they found a metal container buried underground. In it: eight packages of cash totalling $705,000.

Banfield said she believed some of that money came from the estate of his friend, Tom Evans. 

Evans's will did not go through probate and there are no records available with respect to the value or content of his estate.

While the gunman said the New Brunswick lawyer had no assets of any real value, the commission said a number of witnesses later told the RCMP that he benefited financially from being the sole beneficiary of Evans's estate.

The gunman had a history of hiding money around his properties, Banfield said, and that it was "normal" for him to have large bundles of cash. 

During a search of Gabriel Wortman's Portapique cottage, the RCMP discovered this metal ammunition container hidden below ground under the deck, containing cash. The money was in bundles of $100 bills adding up to $705,000. (Mass Casualty Commission)

One of the bundles of $100 bills found in a metal ammuniton box hidden underground beneath the gunman's cottage in Portapique. The total cash amount found was $705,000. (Mass Casualty Commission)

As previously reported,  the perpetrator withdrew $475,000 from an account at CIBC in March of 2020.

Banfield said he buried that money in a duffle bag at the cottage.

A senior manager for corporate security at CIBC said the request was unusual and he was concerned but that the money was "clean" meaning it raised no red flags. 

"How he brought it in and obviously no flags, nothing was abnormal, no flags came up, nothing was triggered" Joe Morgado told the commission in an interview. 

He said other clients, like the gunman, were concerned the start of the pandemic would bring on the collapse of banks.

Suspicious deposits triggered 2010 report

After the mass casualty, Canada's financial intelligence agency passed on information to RCMP regarding suspicious transactions, but FINTRAC had the gunman on its radar back in 2010, according to the documents.

In August of 2010, the gunman deposited $70,000 cash into a TD Bank account held in the name of one of his companies, Northumberland Investments Ltd. About two weeks later, he deposited another $130,000 in cash into the same account before withdrawing the $200,000 via a bank draft payable to himself. 

The cash deposits triggered TD to send a suspicious transaction report to FINTRAC. Banks are required to report suspicious transactions "if there are reasonable grounds" to suspect  money laundering or terrorist financing. 

The Mass Casualty Commission said it's unclear where the $200,000 bundle of cash came from. The commission said it contacted TD Bank, Scotiabank and CIBC — all institutions the gunman dealt with — for any clues but the banks said those records fall outside of their record-keeping timelines. 

TD's suspicious transaction report also mentioned a $154,000 deposit — around the same time as the $200,000 cash deposits — into the Northumberland account from a trust account of the law office of Alan G.D. Irvine. The account also received a credit of $78,000 from the trust account.

"FINTRAC did not appear to inform local law enforcement of this report or taken any other action," wrote the commission.

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

Because Canada's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing law has strict rules around sensitive information, FINTRAC said it "cannot comment on any decision to refer or not refer a [suspicious transaction report] to law enforcement."

After the shooting, PayPal Canada Co. and TD Bank filed suspicious transaction reports to FINTRAC detailing credit card payments and purchases and cash deposits. 

In its explanation, PayPal said it identified an account linked to the gunman "that is believed to have been used to make purchases for items utilized in facilitation of domestic terrorist activities."

 On April 22, 2020 —  days after the rampage came to an end —  FINTRAC forwarded the suspicious transaction report to the RCMP saying that it has "reasonable grounds to suspect" the information is "relevant to an investigation or prosecution of a money laundering offence." 

On May 1, 2020, FINTRAC said it sent more information onto the Mounties from PayPal and TD about the gunman buying police items including a centre console for a 2013 Ford Taurus, a ram for the front bumper of a Taurus sedan, siren lights, a dashcam, a thin blue line vinyl decal and a gun rack.

The gunman dressed as an RCMP officer and drove a replica police cruiser as he murdered 22 people on April 18 and 19, 2020. 

Plans to defraud immigration program 

The documents released Tuesday also detail how the gunman had begun to sketch out how he could defraud the Atlantic Immigration Pilot Program.

The federal program, launched in  2017, is meant to fill gaps in local labour markets by allowing  approved businesses to sponsor immigrants with the  understanding that they would be hired for a one-year period. Those who immigrate under the program are granted permanent residency within six months.

Emails between the gunman and friend Kevin von Bargen, a lawyer in Ontario, discuss having immigrants pay a fee and year's salary to Atlantic Denture and in return the clinic would make them an "employee" for a year. The applicant wouldn't have to actually work at the clinic and the plan was to pay the fake employee their own money back every two weeks to look like a salary.

The clinic was approved under the program in 2018 and the commission said emails suggest they were actively recruiting.

But more research put the plan on hold.

"The whole structure falls off the rails if it attracts CRA [Canada Revenue Agency] scrutiny," wrote von Bargen.

After the gunman googled "Inside the illegal immigration scheme targeting Atlantic Canada" the two men decided to abandon the scheme.

"Abort is my consensus," wrote the gunman in an email.

The gunman's financial misconduct appears to pre-date his time as a denturist. 

One of the gunman's uncles, Glynn Wortman, told police after the mass casualty that his nephew had a history of smuggling cigarettes into Canada when he was younger. He said the gunman was once caught at the border so then changed to bringing them over by boat.

Wortman said his nephew "sold enough illegal cigarettes that it put him through ... university" 

One of his former neighbours in Portapique, George Forbes, said the gunman used to brag to him about his history selling illegal cigarettes. 

The Mass Casualty Commission said understanding the gunman's finances helps their work examining the causes and circumstances that gave rise to the mass shooting. 

The commission said it ultimately decided not to pursue a full forensic accounting analysis. 

WATCH | Spouse of N.S. mass shooter testifies about guns, violence

Spouse of N.S. mass shooter testifies about guns, violence

4 days ago
Duration 2:31
WARNING: Story contains distressing details | Lisa Banfield, the spouse of the Nova Scotia mass shooter Gabriel Wortman, testified at the Mass Casualty Commission about the shooter's guns, fake RCMP vehicle and violent tendencies.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau, where she covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously for CBC in Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wk0jA9Ejyw8&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells 

 


MCC - DAY 52 - THE BRENDA CALL... TROY MAXWELL & WORTMAN'S FINANCES

1,333 views
Streamed live on Jul 19, 2022
3.43K subscribers
Troy Maxwell's Notes July 6, 2013: https://masscasualtycommission.ca/fil... Troy Maxwell MCC interview transcript (No audio or video): https://masscasualtycommission.ca/fil... Wortman's finances: https://masscasualtycommission.ca/fil...

  

14 Comments

David Amos
PAUL PALANGO was born in Hamilton, Ontario and earned a degree in journalism from Carleton University. He has worked at the Hamilton Spectator (1974-1976), covered the Toronto Blue Jays in their first season for the Toronto Sun (1977), and worked at the Globe and Mail from 1977 to 1990 as City Editor and National Editor. In 1993, he began work as a fraud investigator for a leading forensic accounting firm, which allowed him to see the justice system from a unique perspective. In that capacity, he traveled extensively around North America investigating fraud, including an arson investigation in Saskatchewan, in which he helped the Mounties there focus on the likely perpetrator, who eventually was convicted and went to prison.
 
 
David Amos
Dwayne King Senior Manager, Grant Thornton Dwayne is a member of Grant Thornton’s AML Advisory. Prior to working at Grant Thornton Dwayne managed a team of 26 investigators as part of the Global Anti-Money Laundering Department for TD Bank. Dwayne also has 26 years of experience in Law Enforcement which includes over 8 years investigating Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime. Dwayne is a court qualified Money Laundering expert. He has received his designation as an Advanced Financial Crimes Investigative Specialist (CAMS – FCI), a Certified Anti Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS), a Certified Financial Crimes Specialists (CFCS) and a Certified Bitcoin Professional (CBP).

 

Underestimate at your peril
God wins and those who come against Him and His people shall be scattered to the winds like chaff.

 

brickleberry
I’m catching up on some missed parts and can’t get over how she is grilling this officer over their DV narrative. Disgusting.
 

Joanne Willoughby
Finally home, time to watch. Hello everyone
 
CON-CAN
I feel that the lawyers actually cross examining this witness illustrates that they are capable of asking good question, but that they aren't allowed to for the most part. There has to be a reason to badger a witness like that.
 
Peter Byker
Yet, they call them "findings" when they're done! Ridiculous. All we've found are more questions.
 
 
brickleberry
Why was That family’s lawyer so mad?? I’m so confused
 
 
Ken Triol
I look forward to the comments and I just couldn't make them work on this one. I have no idea why.
 
 
Joanne Willoughby
Shoot, live chat is not available
 
 
Peter Byker
I'm rewatching a lot of this, what a day! Thanks for your interest ❤ 
 
 
Hopefully it is working now...

 

 

https://acams.digitellinc.com/acams/speakers/view/7701 

 

Dwayne_King

Dwayne King

Senior Manager, Grant Thornton

Dwayne is a member of Grant Thornton’s AML Advisory. Prior to working at Grant Thornton Dwayne managed a team of 26 investigators as part of the Global Anti-Money Laundering Department for TD Bank. Dwayne also has 26 years of experience in Law Enforcement which includes over 8 years investigating Money Laundering and Proceeds of Crime. Dwayne is a court qualified Money Laundering expert. He has received his designation as an Advanced Financial Crimes Investigative Specialist (CAMS – FCI), a Certified Anti Money Laundering Specialist (CAMS), a Certified Financial Crimes Specialists (CFCS) and a Certified Bitcoin Professional (CBP).

 

https://gateway.on24.com/wcc/eh/2313054/lp/3460518/5c_everything_you_were_afraid_to_ask_but_want_to_know_about_being_an_expert_witness/?partnerref=on24seo 

 

webcast

5C: Everything You Were Afraid to Ask but Want to Know About Being an Expert Witness

2:35 PM - 03:25 PM ET - What does it take to become an expert witness? What will it be like to defend your first opinion? What can you expect during testimony? How can you ensure you remain impartial? How can you start shaping your career now to become an expert? During this interactive session, you will get answers to these and many other questions as you hear expert witnesses speak openly and candidly about their journeys. True stories of actual court testimony will bring this training session to life as you learn through the eyes of current court-qualified witnesses.

 

You will learn how to:

  • Identify what it takes to become an expert witness
  • Assess methods to remain impartial
  • Determine what to expect during testimony

 

CPE: 1.0 | Ethics CPE: Yes

Session Level: Basic

Field of Study: Specialized Knowledge

Recommended Prerequisite: None

Speaker Bio

Dwayne King, CFE

Dwayne King, CFE

Lead Financial Crimes Investigator, Mass Casualty Commission

Privy Council Office

Dwayne King has 27 years of experience in law enforcement with more than eight years investigating money laundering and proceeds of crime as part of the Financial Crimes Unit of the Toronto Police Service. After leaving law enforcement, Dwayne managed a team of 26 investigators as part of the Global Anti-Money Laundering Department for TD Bank.

For two years, he was a Senior Manager as part of Grant Thornton’s Forensics Team. In April Dwayne took a leave from Grant Thornton and joined the Mass Casualty Commission as the lead financial crimes investigator into Canada's worst mass murder.

Caroline Dixon

Caroline Dixon

Senior Manager

Grant Thornton

As a senior manager in Grant Thornton's forensics and dispute resolution group, as well as a qualified Chartered Accountant (CA) and CA-designated specialist in investigative and forensic accounting (CA-IFA), I specialize in providing forensic accounting and litigation support services, as well as a wide range of anti-fraud work, to a diverse client base.On any given day, I’m helping clients conduct fraud risk and vulnerability assessments, internal control compliance engagements, fraud investigations, forensic accounting assignments, and anti-fraud work. I work with organizations across numerous industries, including police services, education, municipal, provincial and federal governments, healthcare, forestry, pharmaceutical, not-for-profit, and other public sector and Crown corporations.

As a senior manager in Grant Thornton's forensics and dispute resolution group, as well as a qualified Chartered Accountant (CA) and CA-designated specialist in investigative and forensic accounting (CA-IFA), I specialize in providing forensic accounting and litigation support services, as well as a wide range of anti-fraud work, to a diverse client base.

On any given day, I’m helping clients conduct fraud risk and vulnerability assessments, internal control compliance engagements, fraud investigations, forensic accounting assignments, and anti-fraud work. I work with organizations across numerous industries, including police services, education, municipal, provincial and federal governments, healthcare, forestry, pharmaceutical, not-for-profit, and other public sector and Crown corporations.

Outside of the office, you can find me speaking on the topics of forensic accounting, fraud awareness and prevention, and internal control risks, or co-authoring articles and whitepapers relating to fraud. I’ve also been qualified numerous times in the Ontario Court of Justice, as well as the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, to testify as an expert witness in forensic accounting.

In my spare time, I am generally outside—usually running, mountain biking, skiing or playing soccer.

 

RE The Nova Scotia mass shootings Seems that I must ask the CBC and their buddies the RCMP and FBI if the name Col. Joe Dotson Beasley The Third rings any bells EH Higgy???

Add star 

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Mon, May 2, 2022 at 8:44 PM
To: "elizabeth.mcmillan"<elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, jpink@pinklarkin.com, andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, JUSTMIN <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, "freedomreport.ca"<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis"<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Dwayne.King@masscasualtycommission.ca, Ronda.Bessner@masscasualtycommission.ca, prmibullrun@gmail.com, tim <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, zane@halifaxexaminer.ca


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/05/nova-scotia-gunman-was-on-police-radar_2.html

Monday 2 May 2022

Nova Scotia gunman was on police radar long before mass shooting, RCMP confirm


https://www.cbc.ca/listen/live-radio/1-63-the-current/clip/15909834-how-nova-scotia-mass-shooter-acquired-guns-maine

The Current with Matt Galloway
How the Nova Scotia mass shooter acquired guns in Maine
Play Segment
18:56
Share Segment
The inquiry into the deadliest mass shooting in Canada's history
continues this week. Two years ago, a gunman dressed as an RCMP
officer burned down houses and killed 22 people in Nova Scotia. CBC
reporter Elizabeth McMillan explains how tracing the story of how the
Portapique gunman got his weapons brought her to Houlton, Maine. And
retired U.S. federal prosecutor Margaret Groban talks about how Maine
is considered a source state for guns.
Aired: May 2, 2022

This is Google's cache of
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-nova-scotia-gunman-was-on-police-radar-long-before-mass-shooting-rcmp/.
It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 27 Apr 2022 08:54:29
GMT.

Nova Scotia gunman was on police radar long before mass shooting, RCMP confirm

Greg MercerAtlantic Canada Reporter
Halifax
Published June 4, 2020

This article was published more than 1 year ago. Some information may
no longer be current.

A Nova Scotia flag and single candle hangs on a pole on Highway 2 near
Portapique, N.S. on Friday, April 24, 2020 in memory of those killed.
The RCMP have been criticized over how they responded to the shooting
and for not warning residents about the gunman through the province’s
public alert system.Darren Calabrese/The Globe and

Nova Scotia RCMP say they are re-examining a 2013 domestic abuse and
weapons complaint against the gunman behind Canada’s worst mass
shooting, trying to better understand what, if any, action was taken
at the time.

They are also reviewing a policy under which some RCMP records are
purged after two years, in light of a now-deleted 2011 police safety
bulletin that warned Gabriel Wortman had a stash of weapons and had
said he wanted to kill a police officer.

That safety bulletin was erased from the RCMP’s database in 2013 –
part of an information management policy that police acknowledge
likely needs to change.

“We need to retain that information, and know about it for
circumstances such as this,” Chief Superintendent Chris Leather,
criminal operations officer for the Nova Scotia RCMP, said during an
update on the investigation.

N.S. family urges federal, provincial governments to end ‘back and
forth’ over public inquiry into mass shooting

Police told in 2011 that Nova Scotia gunman wanted to ‘kill a cop,’
document says

The 2011 safety bulletin and 2013 complaint, which came to light in
news reports, show the gunman was on the police radar long before he
killed 22 people in rural Nova Scotia in April, an attack police say
started with an assault on the woman he lived with.

The RCMP have been criticized over how they responded to the shooting
and for not warning residents about the gunman through the province’s
public alert system. Now, they’re also facing questions about why the
earlier complaints against the 51-year-old denturist did not result in
charges.

RCMP brass say they’ve identified two officers who handled the 2013
domestic abuse complaint, made by a neighbour in Portapique, N.S.,
where the gunman had a cottage. The complainant was concerned about
the gunman’s collection of illegal weapons and assaults on his partner
– including an incident where he was seen choking her on the ground
during a bonfire.

“We’re working through what records, notes and recollections they have
from that incident,” said Superintendent Darren Campbell, the officer
in charge of support services for Nova Scotia RCMP.

The RCMP initially said it had no record of that 2013 complaint.

Linda MacDonald, a co-founder of Persons Against Non-State Torture, an
anti-domestic violence organization, said cases where complaints seem
to go nowhere can dissuade people from reporting incidents. That’s a
major problem, because chronic spousal abuse and misogyny are often
linked to larger violent acts, she said.

“We’re very concerned that police don’t take these complaints very
seriously,” said Ms. MacDonald, a nurse based in Truro, N.S. “There’s
such a close connection between mass violence and spousal assault, but
police are ignoring it in this case.”

Supt. Campbell said complaints to police are taken seriously and followed up.

“I need the public to understand, when you call us, we believe you,” he said.

The 2011 safety bulletin was triggered by an anonymous tip to the
Truro Police Service from someone concerned about Mr. Wortman’s state
of mind, and his anger over a complaint about a break-and-enter at the
cottage he felt wasn’t properly investigated. The gunman’s main
residence was in Dartmouth, so Halifax Regional Police investigated
the tip, and then closed the file, the RCMP said.

An RCMP officer visited the cottage in Portapique several times, but
didn’t witness anything that would justify further investigation or
enough evidence of a danger to the public to produce a search warrant,
Supt. Campbell said.

“He didn’t see anything that caused him any concern or allow him to
take further action,” he said.

Chief Supt. Leather also suggested other reports, including complaints
and disputes with neighbours in the Portapique area from the early
2000s may have also been purged from police records.

Still, had police known about the 2011 safety bulletin when they
responded to 911 calls in April, they would not have responded any
differently, he said. The RCMP say the weapons used in the attack were
obtained long after that warning was issued.

“While a bulletin existed in 2011, it likely would not have changed
our response on April 18 and 19,” he said.

Supt. Campbell also revealed some details about an assessment done by
a forensic psychologist, which described the gunman as an “injustice
collector.”

Police use the term to describe someone who “may have felt slighted or
cheated or disrespected at any point in time in their lives. It may be
real, it may be perceived by the individual, however, as a result,
these injustices were held onto,” he said.

Supt. Campbell said at the briefing that a behavioural analysis of the
gunman has found some of his victims were targeted for perceived past
injustices, while others were selected at random.

The RCMP’s top brass also said they didn’t order an evacuation of
Portapique during the mass shooting because they initially believed
the gunman was in the area “lying in wait"– and sending people out of
their homes might put them in danger.

They now know he slipped away just minutes after RCMP arrived, driving
a look-alike police vehicle and wearing an officer’s uniform.

The RCMP don’t yet know how he obtained the uniform. He was never an
auxiliary member of the RCMP or a volunteer, Chief Supt. Leather
confirmed. He also did not get help from two retired RCMP officers in
his family, or a friend in another police force, to obtain any of his
uniforms or vests, they said.

Nova Scotia’s Justice Minister says there will be a joint
federal-provincial inquiry or review into the mass killing, but the
exact form is still taking shape. The RCMP are working on a national
policy for public alerts.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe
editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important
headlines. Sign up today.

Follow Greg Mercer on Twitter: @GregMercerGlobe

https://www.cbc.ca/radio/asithappens/as-it-happens-wednesday-edition-1.5567774/neighbour-who-warned-rcmp-about-n-s-shooter-s-domestic-violence-says-she-was-scared-to-death-of-him-1.5567781


Neighbour who warned RCMP about N.S. shooter's domestic violence says
she was 'scared to death' of him


Brenda Forbes says she sold her home and left town to get away from
Gabriel Wortman
CBC Radio · Posted: May 13, 2020 4:44 PM ET

Flowers pile up at a makeshift memorial in the small community of
Portapique, N.S. (Jonathan Villeneuve/Radio-Canada)

As It Happens12:12Neighbour who warned RCMP about N.S. shooter's
domestic violence says she was 'scared to death' of him

Update: After this story was published, RCMP told the Globe and Mail
it it has identified the two police officers who responded to a 2013
weapons and domestic abuse complaint against Gabriel Wartman and are
reviewing how it was handled. Police initially told CBC it had no
record of any such complaint. They are also reviewing a policy under
which some RCMP records are deleted after two years.

Warning: This story contains descriptions of domestic violence.

Transcript

Brenda Forbes says she was so afraid of her neighbour Gabriel Wortman
that she sold her Portapique, N.S., home and left town.

Six years later, she says Wortman burned that house to the ground and
killed everyone inside.

Wortman killed 22 people across various Nova Scotia communities last
month and burned a number of homes before police shot and killed him
outside a gas station in Enfield. He is believed to have perpetrated
the worst mass killing in Canadian history.

But years before that, in 2013, Forbes says she warned the RCMP that
Wortman was a dangerous man who beat his girlfriend and kept a cache
of weapons in his home. That's the same girlfriend who police say
Wortman beat and bound at the start of his murderous rampage. She
escaped and hid in the woods.

The Nova Scotia RCMP say they have no record of Forbes' complaint and
their investigation into the shooting is ongoing.

"We are looking into the gunman's previous relationships and
interactions," Cst. Hans Ouellette said in an email.

Forbes, who first told her story to the Halifax Examiner and The
Canadian Press, spoke to As It Happens host Carol Off. Here is part of
their conversation.

Brenda, how would you describe your former neighbour, Gabriel Wortman?

One word. Psychopath.

Is that how you would have described him before you knew what he did?

Oh yeah. Both me and my husband knew what he was like. And I let other
people in the community know the same thing and what he had been doing
with [his partner]. A lot of them just said to me, "Oh no, he's not
like that."

How did he treat her?

Like his possession.

He drank quite a bit, and when he drank, he got violent. And he had
her totally under his control.

You witnessed that he was physically abusing her as well. What can you
tell us about that?

The first time … she ran over to my house, actually, and she said that
he'd been beating her and he had blocked her car in so she couldn't
get away.

I said, "You need to get help."

And she said, "No, I can't, because he will hurt me again."

    Neighbour reported N.S. mass shooter's domestic violence, weapons to police

    Nova Scotia mass killer should be subjected to psychological
autopsy: experts

There was a second time, another incident, I understand, where you
wanted to get the RCMP involved. Can you tell us about that?

He got into drinking. She was there. And there were three other people
that were there, three other guys.

One of the guys told me he had her on the ground, was strangling her
and screaming at her. And she actually said, "Don't get involved or
you're only going to make it worse.".

One of the guys told me what happened. So I said, "That's it. It's done."

I went into work and I called the RCMP and they came down to see me.

I told them what the one fella had told me had happened. And I also
said that he has a bunch of illegal weapons as well.

And he said, "Can you get one of these guys to confirm what you just said?"

I said, "I will try. I will call one of them," which I did.

And I said [to the witness], "Would you be willing to talk to the
RCMP?" And the answer I got back was, "No way. ... He'll kill me."
The faces of some of the victims killed by a gunman in Nova Scotia. (CBC)

You and your husband said that you knew that he had these illegal
firearms. How did you know?

We're military, or we were. We're both retired now. And he'd had us at
his house when he first moved there, and he showed them to us.

And we knew right away that there is no way that he would have got
them here in Canada, number one, and he didn't have an FAC [Firearms
Acquisition Certificate].

And he actually asked us, because we were military, if we could get
him a weapon or ammunition.

My husband's like, "What? No way. That's against the law."

Did you ever tell the RCMP that you saw those firearms?

When I had that interview with them, I told them then.

They said ... we had to have, like, pictures or proof that he actually
had these weapons. We didn't have that.

So there was nothing, basically nothing, at that time that they could do.

    N.S. shooting rampage highlights public threat of domestic
violence: victim advocates

    Analysis
    Advocates say new firearms ban part of 'suite of protections'
needed to protect women from violence

I understand that you came to be personally afraid of him. From time
to time you had seen other women at his place when his partner wasn't
there. And you came to tell one of your neighbours about that.

He dragged her over to my house, pounded on the door. My husband
answered the door and [Wortman] ... started screaming.

I came downstairs, and he was screaming at me.

And I said, "If the shoe fits, wear it." I said, "I've seen countless
women at your place."

And he grabbed her, hauled her out the door, and he said, "You're
going to pay for this" to me.

Well, after that, she was no longer allowed to talk to me, come
anywhere near me, nothing.

My husband ended up going to Africa for the military, and I was
basically by myself. I would go to work and come back. And as soon as
I got home, he'd show up in his vehicle, park it right outside my
house, get out, stand and stare at the house for a good half-hour. And
he did that for a few days.

And I went, this is crazy. I'm scared to death now.

I could no longer live like that. My husband came home from Africa and
I let him know what had been going on.

[Wortman] showed up again, and [my husband] is like,"Yeah, we're more moving."

So we put the house up for sale and it took over a year to sell it. We
took a huge loss in it, because I just wanted to get out of there.

The one thing that I have regret about was the people that bought the
house. I should have let them know what he was like, because they
ended up getting killed too.

The laws have to change. If somebody gets, whether it be male or
female, if they get assaulted, if they're abused or whatever and
somebody reports it for them because they're too afraid to, it should
be looked at right away.

    - Brenda Forbes, former neighbour of the Nova Scotia shooter

So the people who bought your house were killed?

Yeah, and he burned the house down.

When you learned that, what effect did it have on you?

I'm going to say that he burned that house down not because the people
that were living there, but because of me.

It just rocked my world. And for somebody with PTSD [from the
military], it's a little bit harder.

Brenda, I'm so sorry. That's just simply awful. But you can't feel
you're responsible for that in any way.

It's hard not to.

But you're not. And you did everything you could. And when he was
menacing you at your door when you were alone in the house, did you
report him?

No, because the thing with being in the military, the words were,
"Suck it up, princess." Right? You're tough. You're a soldier. Just
soldier on.

So, no. Ugh. This is hard.

I can hear that it's very, very painful to talk about this, especially
the fear that you had as well. On the night of April 18th, [when] you
heard the story of this shooting ... in your neighborhood, did you
immediately think of your neighbour?

Oh, I knew it was him. And the first person I thought of was her.

Right away, I called the RCMP and let them know everything.

And they've interviewed you since?

I've had probably, I don't know, four or five interviews.
A Wentworth volunteer firefighter douses hotspots near destroyed
vehicles linked to the killings. (Tim Krochak/Getty Images)

Have you been able to speak with [Wortman's former partner] since?

I haven't spoken with her. No.

Would you like to?

Yes, I would. But I don't think she really wants to talk to anybody right now.

What would you say to her if you could?

How much I feel for her. How much I know that she had to go through.
Everything. I'm just glad she's OK.

Do you know if she has friends, if anyone is helping her, if she has a
circle of any kind?

When she was with him, she really wasn't allowed to have friends. But
she does have a good family.

When you reflect on this and what you knew over the years that you
were observing this, are your thoughts that this possibly could have
been prevented?

Yes.

The laws have to change. If somebody gets, whether it be male or
female, if they get assaulted, if they're abused or whatever and
somebody reports it for them because they're too afraid to, it should
be looked at right away.

And if you report anybody that has what you know are illegal weapons,
whether you have pictures or what of it, if somebody reports that, it
should be investigated, like, yesterday.

Is that why you came forward to tell your story? You want to get that
message out?

No.

When I first saw the stuff happening on the news and I saw neighbours
and stuff saying, "Oh, he was such a nice guy," I went ballistic.

So you wanted people to know what he was about.

When I was still living there and I let people around me that were
living there know what he had done and what he was like, they were
saying, "Oh no, he's not like that."

Well, now I'm getting bunches of e-mails from people that were there
that I told about what he was doing and stuff. And they're all
apologizing to me.

That doesn't work for me. You didn't believe me in the beginning. I'm
not a crazy lady. What I said was true. And it just irritates me now
that, oh, you finally realize it after everybody's dead.

Sorry, I'm getting a little upset here.

Brenda, you are entitled to be upset. And I just want to make sure
that you're OK, that when we let you go, you've got someone to talk to
or to be there with you.

Yes, I have a service dog and my husband.

OK, Brenda. You've been very generous and I know we walked you through
a lot of really painful stuff. But I think people appreciate knowing
what you've been able to tell them. Thank you.

You're welcome.

Written by Sheena Goodyear with files from The Canadian Press.
Interview produced by Kate Swoger and Jeanne Armstrong. Q&A has been
edited for length and clarity.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/how-the-nova-scotia-mass-shooter-smuggled-guns-into-canada-1.6437579


How the Nova Scotia mass shooter smuggled guns into Canada

Multiple people knew where the gunman stowed guns in the back of his
pickup truck
Elizabeth McMillan · CBC News · Posted: May 02, 2022 6:00 AM AT

The Blue Water Bridge into Port Huron, Mich., in 2020. Witnesses say
the gunman in the N.S. mass shooting smuggled guns and alcohol across
the Maine border into Canada. (Paul Sancya/Associated Press)

An RCMP investigator told a close friend of the N.S. man who killed 22
people that police didn't plan to hold the Maine man accountable for
giving the killer a gun, but wanted to know about how the shooter
acquired his weapons and smuggled them across the border to ensure
guns wouldn't make it into Canada in the future.

A transcript of the May 2020 RCMP interview with Sean Conlogue — a
resident of Houlton, Maine who knew Gabriel Wortman for more than two
decades — has been posted online by the public inquiry examining the
April 2020 mass shooting.

A CBC News investigation found that though Conlogue and at least one
other person in Maine may have broken U.S. federal laws by helping the
shooter obtain two of the guns he used during the April 2020 rampage,
it is unlikely they will face charges.

    CBC Investigates
    How the N.S. gunman got his weapons and who may have helped him in Maine

It is illegal for an American to transfer, sell, trade, give,
transport or deliver a firearm to someone they know is not a U.S.
resident. Investigators believe the shooter, who didn't have a
firearms licence, obtained three of the guns he used during the
massacre in Houlton and smuggled them into Canada.

Police traced two of his weapons back to Conlogue, who told
investigators he had no idea what his friend was planning. In a
four-hour interview, RCMP Staff Sgt. Greg Vardy asked him about their
relationship, guns and border crossings.

The gunman frequently stayed at Conlogue's home and had online orders
shipped to his address. Conlogue said he'd given Wortman a Ruger
handgun as a "token of appreciation" for the work he did around his
property during his visits.
The gunman frequently stayed at his friend Sean Conlogue's home in
Houlton, Maine. He had parcels, including pieces of the replica
cruiser he built, shipped there and would drive them back over the
border. (Eric Woolliscroft/CBC)

In response, Vardy told Conlogue it was illegal for him to do so.

"I'm not interested in charging you…. I want to know, like, the
truth," the Mountie said.

"We don't have any inkling of coming down here, coming after Sean
Conlogue for this event. This is about knowing what's happened for
those 22 families, so that in the future this stuff is not gonna
happen again. In the future, that these guns will never get across
that border."
Frequent border crossings

Search warrant documents show the Canada Border Services Agency
determined the gunman crossed the border at Woodstock, N.B., a short
drive from Houlton, 15 times in the two years prior to the shootings.

That included in April 2019 when the shooter stayed with Conlogue for
a week to help him after a foot surgery. During that visit, police
believe Wortman purchased a high-powered rifle — a Colt Law
Enforcement-brand carbine 5.56-mm semi-automatic — after attending a
local gun show.
After police shot and killed the gunman at a gas station in Enfield,
N.S., they found five firearms in his possession, three handguns and
two rifles. He obtained three of them in Houlton, Maine. (Mass
Casualty Commission)

Conlogue said he was in bed recovering and didn't go to the show, but
assumed Wortman went with a mutual friend. Vardy named the man but the
public inquiry has not released any documents related to interviews
with him.

He told Vardy he saw the shooter counting cash and remembers seeing a
rifle the day before the gunman left to return home to Nova Scotia.

"I said, 'what in the hell do you need something like that for?' And I
think his words were 'I've always wanted one,'" according to the
transcript of his RCMP statement.
Getting the guns across the border

Conlogue also told RCMP that he believed Wortman took the rifle back
into Canada by wrapping it up in the aluminum tonneau cover of his
truck.

"The day they left…. He was working on his roll-up top," Conlogue
said, adding that he "didn't want to rock the boat" and never asked
about the gun or the border crossing specifically.

Others, including Conlogue's friend, Scott Shaffer, and the gunman's
partner, Lisa Banfield, also told investigators they believed the guns
were smuggled that way.
A photo of the gunman's multiple cars, including the Ford F-150 pickup
truck, rear right, witnesses say he often used on trips across the
Maine border. (Mass Casualty Commission)

Banfield said she asked her spouse about it and he explained he'd
leave the cover rolled up and the back of the F-150 pickup open.

"So if they're looking for something, they're looking inside, they'd
have no reason to open the tonneau cover," Banfield told RCMP on April
28, 2020, adding he denied ever taking guns across the border while
she was with him.

Conlogue was also aware that Wortman had taken guns across the border before.

After the death of their mutual friend, Fredericton lawyer Tom Evans,
Conlogue said Wortman wrapped Evans's Ruger Mini in a blanket and
brought it to Maine. That rifle was another gun police found at the
end of the 13-hour rampage.
Police traced a Ruger P89 9-mm semi-automatic handgun back to Houlton,
Maine, and Conlogue told them he'd given it to the shooter as a gift.
He said his friend took a Glock 23 .40 calibre semi-automatic pistol
from his home. Police found the pistol in the stolen car the gunman
was driving when he was killed. (CBC News/Illustration)

While speaking with Vardy initially, Conlogue was vague about two
Glock handguns that went missing from his home, before explaining that
Wortman called him in the fall of 2017 to say he took them. Conlogue
said his friend had permission to use the handguns, but the agreement
was they were supposed to stay in his Houlton home.

"I didn't know until he had told me that he took those guns across the
border and I [pretty] near had a heart attack," Conlogue said in the
RCMP interview.

"It broke my heart because he betrayed trust that I'd had in him… I
probably at that time I should have said something."
Information crucial for border security

Ronald Vitiello, the former head of the U.S. border patrol, said
having someone close to the gunman report his activities could have
impacted how agents interacted with the gunman during his many border
crossings.

He said people who know an offender are the best source of up-to-date
intelligence.

"If somebody that had suspicion about his illegal activity went to the
RCMP or went to local authorities or went to the border authorities
and said, 'Hey, look, we think this individual is doing X, Y and Z'…
that might have been enough to scrutinize his travel back and forth a
bit more," he told CBC News.

"It highlights the need for individuals to report suspicious activity.
It highlights the need for both countries to co-operate on the
security regime to protect both the border community and the homeland
at large, right? Both Canada and the U.S."

The tonneau cover in the back of a vehicle would be a common place to
search if the shooter was flagged as a potential threat, he said.
According to search warrant documents, the gunman made the
approximately five-hour drive to Maine 15 times over two years prior
to the shootings, the Canada Border Services Agency determined. (CBC
News/Illustration)

The Canada Border Services Agency told CBC it uses "data, intelligence
and risk indicators to identify illicit firearms."

"Guided by intelligence" border agents use tools that include X-ray
machines, including hand-held ones, and detector dogs, the government
agency said in a statement to CBC News.

"Their specialized training, expertise and knowledge, in detecting
contraband and prohibited or restricted goods, allows them to always
be on the lookout for dangerous goods," it said.

But witnesses who spoke to police, including Banfield, said Wortman
was rarely searched. He had a NEXUS card, which meant both the U.S.
and Canada considered him a low-risk traveller.
NEXUS card for low-risk travellers

Anyone can apply for NEXUS. The program was designed to speed up
border crossings.

Applicants must go through an interview process and pass the risk
assessments of U.S. Customs and Border and CBSA background checks.

Criminal convictions will show on those checks and new convictions
will result in someone's membership being cancelled, Rebecca Purdy, a
senior spokesperson for the CBSA, said in an emailed statement.

Wortman didn't have a criminal record, though he received a
conditional discharge after pleading guilty to a 2001 assault. Meeting
conditions set by the court, which included nine months of probation
and a $50 fine, meant the case could be resolved without a conviction
on his record.

    Suspect in N.S. killings didn't have criminal record, but
previously pleaded guilty to a crime

Once approved, NEXUS members crossing land borders show their card at
a reader. They then pass a border officer who decides if they are
required to enter an inspection area, the CBSA told CBC.

Members may still be subject to in-depth searches because anyone
crossing the border can be referred for a secondary search, the
agency's statement said. Referrals happen as the result of factors
such as document validation, declaring goods and the payment of duties
and taxes.

It said everyone is required to report controlled or restricted items
like firearms and people importing goods aren't supposed to use the
NEXUS lane either.
CBSA has tip line

Vitiello said the authorities need people to flag illegal activity for
the system to work well.

"Having a regime that allows for low-risk travellers and people to
come in and out of both countries conveniently and friction-free is a
good thing, right? It helps drive both economies," said Vitiello.

"It highlights the need for the co-operation among border authorities
– co-operation with regard to intelligence and threats to criminal or
in the terrorism regime. "

CBSA said people can always report concerns to CBSA Border Watch by
calling a tip line or submitting information online.

In the 2021-2022 fiscal year, the agency seized 955 guns at border
crossings, including non-restricted, restricted and prohibited
firearms. That was up from 548 during 2020-2021 when travel was
limited due to the pandemic. In 2019-2020, the agency seized 753.
Gunman linked to firearms before 2020

The 2020 attacks weren't the first suggestion that the gunman, who
never had a licence to possess or use firearms, had them anyway.

CBC previously obtained records through freedom of information that
show in 2011, a Truro police officer circulated a tip to other
policing agencies that a source reported seeing firearms at the
gunman's Portapique, N.S., cottage and that he kept a handgun in his
night stand and a long gun in a compartment by a fireplace.

    CBC Investigates
    2011 tip that warned N.S. gunman wanted 'to kill a cop' was purged
from RCMP records

    Neighbour who warned RCMP about N.S. shooter's domestic violence
says she was 'scared to death' of him

That same report also referenced a 2010 investigation into threats
against the gunman's parents and information on file about him having
"several long rifles." The RCMP said in June 2020 that they were
looking into past interactions that officers had with the shooter.

In 2013, Brenda Forbes, who used to live in Portapique, told police
she reported to RCMP that her neighbour was abusive toward his partner
and had illegal weapons.
Boasted of history of smuggling

Guns also weren't the only thing people thought the gunman took over
the border illegally.

David McGrath, the partner of one of Lisa Banfield's sisters, told
RCMP the shooter had boasted about smuggling things in university.

"He used to run tobacco over the border when he was like, I don't
know, 20 years old. He was good at it," he said. "He's been shady his
entire [life] as far as I'm concerned."
Search warrant documents outline how the shooter used a Colt Law
Enforcement-brand carbine 5.56-mm semi-automatic rifle and that the
gun came from Maine in 2019. He had adapted it with three overcapacity
magazines, which each held 30 additional rounds. (CBC
News/Illustration )

Shaffer also told police the gunman would also pour vodka in jerry
cans to make it look like he was taking gas across the border to save
money since alcohol was cheaper in Maine.

Conlogue said his friend was known to put liquor in beer bottles. He
didn't know his guns were used in the mass shooting until Vardy told
him.

"That man was in my house, that man was a monster and I didn't see it,
neither did anybody else," Conlogue said.

"Honest to God it's eating me alive…. I can't eat, I can't sleep, I've
lost 25 pounds… evil… that's what it was."


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Elizabeth McMillan

Elizabeth McMillan is a journalist with CBC in Halifax. Over the past
12 years, she has reported from the edge of the Arctic Ocean to the
Atlantic Coast and loves sharing people's stories. Please send tips
and feedback to elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/mass-shooting-guns-houlton-maine-1.6433463

How the N.S. gunman got his weapons and who may have helped him in Maine

U.S. residents may have committed crimes, but it appears no one has been charged
Elizabeth McMillan, Angela MacIvor · CBC News · Posted: Apr 29, 2022 6:00 AM AT

N.S. gunman may have obtained weapons from U.S. residents
3 days ago
Duration 2:16
A CBC News investigation reveals at least two people in Maine may have
broken U.S. federal laws in helping the gunman obtain weapons used in
the April 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting. 2:16

At least two people in Maine may have broken U.S. federal laws by
helping a Nova Scotia man obtain two of the guns he used during the
April 2020 rampage that left 22 people dead, a CBC News investigation
has found — though it appears unlikely they will face charges.

After police shot and killed the gunman at a gas station in Enfield,
N.S., they found five firearms in his possession. Investigators traced
three of the weapons back to Houlton, Maine, a small town less than
seven kilometres from the New Brunswick border that the shooter
visited frequently.

Court records and documents released by the public inquiry examining
the tragedy outline how investigators believe Gabriel Wortman got
them. They suggest a longtime friend in Houlton gifted him one handgun
and he took another from that man's home. He also arranged to purchase
a high-powered rifle for cash after attending a gun show in the town.

The shooter, who didn't have a firearms licence, smuggled the guns
into Canada. Based on American law, he should never have been able to
obtain them in the first place.
Fewer than 6,000 people live in Houlton, Maine, where Nova Scotia's
mass shooter obtained three of his guns. The gunman crossed the nearby
border 15 times in two years prior to the shootings, including a week
in April 2019 that coincided with a gun show in the town. (Eric
Woolliscroft/CBC)

In the U.S., it is illegal for an American to transfer, sell, trade,
give, transport or deliver a firearm to someone they know is not a
U.S. resident, which includes Canadian tourists. Anyone found in
violation may face fines or up to 10 years in prison, depending on the
details of the offence.
Violations don't always end up in court

It appears no one in the U.S. has ever been charged with providing
guns used by the shooter.

A retired U.S. federal prosecutor said that's not entirely surprising.
Margaret Groban said firearms offences rarely end up in U.S. courts
unless the accused is considered a risk to the community.
After police shot and killed the gunman at a gas station in Enfield,
N.S., they found five firearms in his possession: three handguns and
two rifles. He obtained three of them in Houlton, Maine. (Mass
Casualty Commission)

"Even though it is technically a violent crime and people say, 'Why
don't you prosecute the crimes on the books?', there aren't resources
available to do that and it may not even be appropriate to do it,"
said Groban, who worked for the U.S. Department of Justice and now
teaches a course in firearms law at the University of Maine.

"There could be a number of relevant facts that might enter into
whether or not public safety would be served since the perpetrator of
this awful rampage is deceased."

She added that the priority is on stopping people "actively engaged in
violent crime and using firearms to commit those crimes."

Technical violations fall much further down the list.
No announced charges in U.S.

The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Exposives (ATF) does
not have an active investigation underway, according to spokesperson
Erik Longnecker. He said he was not aware of any charges related to
the Nova Scotia mass shooting being referred at the local, state or
federal level. CBC News could find no record of charges filed in
court.

The FBI steered questions about the case to Canadian law enforcement,
and said it couldn't confirm or deny the existence of an
investigation.

Meanwhile, the RCMP bounced questions back to the Americans.

The Mounties said they have been working with their "international
counterparts," and "any decisions to lay charges on offences committed
outside of Canada, would be considered by the relevant law enforcement
agency."

    Ammunition charge in N.S. mass murder case sent to restorative justice

    N.S. gunman's spouse, set to undergo restorative justice, lived
'in survival mode,' says lawyer

Early on, the RCMP said tracking the guns and figuring out whether
anyone helped the gunman in the lead-up to the killings was a critical
part of their investigation.

Only three people on the Canadian side of the border have faced any
criminal charges: the gunman's spouse, the spouse's brother and her
brother-in-law were charged with giving Wortman ammunition.

Since then, two of the cases were referred to restorative justice,
while a guilty plea was entered on the third.
How he got the guns

Summaries of police statements released through a court challenge
launched by CBC News and other media outlets shed some light on the
investigation.

They show that, in the days and weeks after the killings, an FBI agent
conducted interviews in Houlton, as did the RCMP and ATF.

One of the people they spoke with was Sean Conlogue, a longtime friend
of the gunman who often hosted him and his partner, Lisa Banfield, in
Houlton.
The gunman frequently stayed at his friend Sean Conlogue's home in
Houlton, Maine. He had parcels, including pieces for the replica
cruiser he built, shipped there and would drive them back over the
border. (Eric Woolliscroft/CBC)

Conlogue, 68, lives in a two-storey house with a spacious garage,
located on a quiet street dotted with aging Victorian homes. It's not
far from the members-only Elks Club in one of town centre's stately
brick buildings where he'd take Wortman for drinks.

The gunman would ship parcels to Conlogue's address, including
motorcycle parts and a light bar used to outfit the replica police
cruiser used during the rampage. Conlogue later told the commission
leading the public inquiry that he didn't open the packages, and
instead stored them at his home until the gunman picked them up.

Their friendship was close enough that Conlogue travelled to Nova
Scotia for Wortman's 50th birthday.

    Spouse of N.S. gunman describes how he unravelled weeks before mass killing

    Residents told police name of gunman, car details while he was
still in Portapique

The gunman and Banfield also shut down their denturist business in
Dartmouth, N.S., to care for Conlogue after he underwent foot surgery
and needed help getting around, according to transcripts of Mass
Casualty Commission interviews.
Conlogue would take his friend for drinks at the Elks Lodge in
Houlton. (Eric Woolliscroft/CBC)

Some time before the killings, the gunman phoned Conlogue to say he
was going to leave something for him in his will, Conlogue told the
commission last fall.

The gunman and his spouse spoke with Conlogue hours before the
violence in Portapique, N.S., started on April 18, 2020, one of the
reasons lawyers representing victims' relatives argued Conlogue should
be called as a witness at the inquiry.

In a phone interview last November, the commission's investigators
didn't probe Conlogue on the firearms. He told inquiry staff at no
point was he under the impression he was being investigated
criminally, and he expressed concern that his statements would become
public.

    How the N.S. gunman convinced people not to report mock cruiser
before mass shooting

    Mounties who killed N.S. gunman testify they were looking for
someone 'vindictive' and 'evil'

Handgun 'sign of gratitude'

Conlogue, who declined to speak with CBC News when two reporters went
to his home in late March, met the gunman years before in New
Brunswick. They shared a mutual friend, former Fredericton lawyer Tom
Evans.

Wortman got one of the five guns later found by police — a Ruger Mini
14 — from Evans's estate after his death, according to search warrant
documents. That rifle and an RCMP-issued service pistol stolen from
Const. Heidi Stevenson after he killed her during the mass shooting
were the only guns investigators traced back to Canada.

The other three came from Maine, and court records suggest Conlogue
once owned two of them — a Ruger P89 9-mm-calibre semi-automatic
handgun, and a Glock 23 .40 calibre semi-automatic pistol.

The Ruger handgun is considered a restricted firearm in Canada,
meaning people are only authorized to use it if they have a licence
and it's used for a specific purpose. The Glock is prohibited because
of the length of its barrel.

Two weeks after the shooting, the Canadian government announced a ban
on 1,500 types of firearms, including the two rifles used in the
killings, the Ruger Mini and a Colt M4 carbine. It was already illegal
to adapt them with additional rounds through over-capacity magazines,
as the gunman did.
Police traced a Ruger P89 9-mm calibre semi-automatic handgun back to
Houlton, Maine, and Conlogue told them he'd given it to the shooter as
a gift. He said his friend took a Glock 23 .40 caliber semi-automatic
pistol from his home. Police found the pistol in the stolen car the
gunman was driving when he was killed. (CBC News/Illustration)

Though his name is redacted in search warrant documents, Conlogue is
identifiable because details match statements he and others gave to
the public inquiry.

The records state that on May 7, 2020, Conlogue explained to an FBI
agent that he gifted Wortman a Ruger handgun two to five years earlier
"as a sign of gratitude" in exchange for odd jobs like tree removal,
since his friend wouldn't accept payment.

Conlogue told investigators that a few years before the shootings, he
discovered his friend had taken two of his Glock handguns back to
Canada, and when asked about it, Wortman said he "needed them for
protection." One of those Glocks was found with him at the end of the
shooting rampage.
According to search warrant documents, the gunman made the
approximately five-hour drive to Maine 15 times over two years prior
to the shootings, the Canada Border Services Agency determined. (CBC
News/Illustration)

Conlogue's close friends, Angel Patterson and Scott Shaffer, relayed a
slightly different sequence of events in their interviews with the
commission. They said that immediately after learning of the
shootings, they were at Conlogue's house and he told them he'd just
discovered empty gun boxes in his home.
A semi-automatic rifle and a straw man purchase

That explains where police think two of the Maine firearms came from.

But what about the third?

Police believe the shooter arranged to purchase a Colt Law
Enforcement-brand carbine 5.56-mm semi-automatic rifle he admired
after attending a gun show in Houlton.

It was April 2019, and he was staying at Conlogue's home at the time,
according to court documents and public inquiry transcripts.

Paul Harrison, who was on the executive of the Houlton Rifle and
Pistol Club that ran the popular event, said all the people selling
firearms inside the arena where it was held were authorized dealers.
That meant every buyer had to go through an FBI background check
before a sale went through.
The Houlton Rifle and Pistol Club's 31st Annual gun show was held
April 27-28, 2019. One of the organizers said about 700 passed through
the arena over the course of the weekend. In order to buy firearms,
American residents had to provide their driver’s licence and submit to
a background check that would ensure they didn't have a record that
would prevent them from owning a gun. (The Houlton Rifle and Pistol
Club/Facebook)

He said Canadians could attend and browse the 50 to 60 tables
displaying everything from ammunition to snowshoes and cookbooks, but
could not purchase firearms.

It's widely understood, he said, that a "straw man" purchase, where
someone buys a gun for another person who is prohibited from being
sold one, is "not a good thing."

"For years, local people here have gone to jail for years for doing
that," he said. "So that's pretty well-known that you don't do that,
whether it's a Canadian citizen or someone that has a felony and is a
prohibited person."
The gunman responsible for Nova Scotia's mass shooting in April 2020
walks by Joey Webber's Ford Escape SUV in Shubenacadie, N.S. The
gunman was carrying a Colt Law Enforcement-brand carbine 5.56 calibre
semi-automatic rifle. (Mass Casualty Commission)


Harrison said it would not have been difficult for authorities to
track who purchased a specific model that weekend, particularly
because all sales came with a paper trail.

"They knew all the vendors that were there. They talked to almost all
of them. I've heard several say that the FBI called them," he told CBC
News.

It appears the authorities did trace the carbine's path to some
extent, though exact details of the transaction and who helped Wortman
remain murky in public documents.
Search warrant documents outline how the shooter used a Colt Law
Enforcement-brand carbine 5.56-mm semi-automatic rifle and that the
gun came from Maine in 2019. He had adapted it with three
over-capacity magazines, which each held 30 additional rounds. (CBC
News/Illustration )

In the summary of the statement Conlogue gave to RCMP, he said he was
aware the shooter went to the gun show with someone else and bought a
rifle-type gun with a pistol grip.

Police spoke to people who either appeared to have been involved in
the sale of the gun, or who knew about it. It's not clear from court
records whether the sale took place inside the arena hosting the gun
show, or was a side-deal done outside. It's also not clear who bought
the gun, and how exactly it was turned over to Wortman.

One person, who was not identified in court records, told police he
sold the gun for $1,000 US to a well-dressed older man who had a Maine
licence with an address he thought was in Houlton.

Another person told RCMP there was a "quick and dirty" sale of a rifle
for $1,250 US, and they "did not know that the gun was for Gabriel and
did not want to get arrested and go to jail."

The Mass Casualty Commission plans to release its report on how the
gunman obtained firearms next week.
The gunman's replica RCMP cruiser that was used in the Nova Scotia
mass shooting was created with a decommissioned 2017 Ford Taurus.
Police believe he shipped parts for it that he ordered online to
Houlton. (Mass Casualty Commission)

Groban, the retired prosecutor, said straw man purchases — where
someone fills out the official paperwork and the gun ends up in
someone else's hands — are all too common in the U.S.

An estimated 100,000 people are caught lying on their firearms
background check forms each year. That doesn't count the people who
get away with it.

She said by comparison, the U.S. attorney's office only prosecutes
about 14,000 firearms cases of any kind a year.

"Even if they just did a steady diet of these cases, they couldn't
even make a dent," she said.
Margaret Groban worked as a prosecutor for three decades and was the
national domestic violence co-ordinator for the executive office for
United States Attorneys at the U.S. Department of Justice. (Submitted
by Margaret Groban)

While she wasn't privy to the details of the mass shooting
investigation, she said factors such as a five-year statute of
limitations and whether someone may have shown a fake licence could
impact any consideration of proceeding with any charges.

A person's remorse could also play a role, she said, if it was viewed
as unlikely they would reoffend.

"If it was someone who …continued to give guns to people who then
committed violent crimes, then that might be someone you would
consider, that would weigh the scales more toward prosecuting," Groban
told CBC News.

"But if it was a one-off crime with someone where he had no knowledge
that this kind of awful rampage would happen, that might weigh in
favour of not charging it."
Maine a corridor

She said Maine is considered a "source state" where it's easier to get guns.

"I don't think the fact of this horrible mass shooting would have been
lost on the Maine authorities and clearly if some Maine-sourced guns
were used that's a tragedy," Groban said. "And things should be done
to make sure that that doesn't happen again."

David Pucino, deputy chief counsel at the advocacy organization
Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, echoed Groban's concern
about resources, and said there is little enforcement of gun laws.

He'd like to see Maine make universal background checks through a
registered dealer mandatory for all firearms transactions, calling
private sales that don't require them "a big failing in the state."
Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left:
Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean
McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey
Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row
from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond,
Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie
Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

"The United States gun problem doesn't stop at our borders. It spills
over and affects every country in the hemisphere," he told CBC News
from New York.

"It's tremendously troubling the ways in which the circumstances that
we've seen in the United States, these mass shootings, these acts of
violence are something that are happening in other countries with U.S.
guns, because we've been so, so negligent here that our country, our
lawmakers have failed in so many ways in advancing a stronger gun
safety regime."
Houlton connection not welcomed

Eileen McLaughlin, a town councillor from Houlton, told CBC News it
was unfortunate her community was now linked to the Nova Scotia
tragedy.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was a part of life to travel back
and forth to New Brunswick, crossing the border and going to nearby
Woodstock for dinner or picking up supplies when needed.
Coun. Eileen McLaughlin of Houlton says she was troubled to learn
about the mass shooting in Nova Scotia and says she's always
considered her community a safe place that doesn't tolerate gun
violence. (Eric Woolliscroft/CBC)

She said there is little gun violence in her community and border
patrol agents are a frequent sight.

"People want to blame somebody. They want to blame a place, an
organization. They want to say, 'Oh, he brought arms over from
Houlton.' It's a reputation that just isn't fair for a community that
works really hard at enforcing laws," she said.

"The people in Houlton would never have approved this person from
having this weapon, and the law enforcement wouldn't. Border patrol
wouldn't. The sheriff's office wouldn't. And there would have been
clear legal ramifications if they had known that this had happened."


ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Elizabeth McMillan

Elizabeth McMillan is a journalist with CBC in Halifax. Over the past
12 years, she has reported from the edge of the Arctic Ocean to the
Atlantic Coast and loves sharing people's stories. Please send tips
and feedback to elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 15:11:37 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE My calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: Dwayne.King@masscasualtycommission.ca,
Ronda.Bessner@masscasualtycommission.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 14:32:30 -0300
Subject: RE My calls and emails about Federal and provincial
governments plan to hold public inquiry into Nova Scotia mass
shootings
To: "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, jpink@pinklarkin.com, andrew
<andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>,
jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
Joel.Kulmatycki@masscasualtycommission.ca, clambie@herald.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, prmibullrun@gmail.com,
tim <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, zane@halifaxexaminer.ca,
media@masscasualtycommission.ca

https://www.saltwire.com/cape-breton/news/ns-mass-casualty-commission-to-announce-participants-in-portapique-probe-100582762/

N.S. Mass Casualty Commission to announce participants in Portapique probe
Chris Lambie · Posted: April 30, 2021, 4:43 p.m.

Investigators want to hear from anyone who can shed light on the
events of April 18-19, 2020, says the release. “If you or someone you
know wants to get in touch with the investigations team, please
contact Joel.Kulmatycki at 902-394-3501 or
Joel.Kulmatycki@masscasualtycommission.ca


https://www.saltwire.com/cape-breton/news/provincial/card-raises-independence-questions-about-nova-scotias-mass-casualty-commission-100584621/

'I have no idea who to trust anymore': card raises independence
questions about Nova Scotia's Mass Casualty Commission
Chris Lambie · Posted: May 5, 2021, 6:46 p.m.

https://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/we-have-got-to-have-someplace-to-put-our-trust-high-expectations-for-the-mass-casualty-commission-1.5457120

'We have got to have someplace to put our trust': High expectations
for the Mass Casualty Commission
Heidi Petracek 2016

Heidi Petracek
CTV News Atlantic Reporter
Published Friday, June 4, 2021 7:28PM ADT


https://www.canadaland.com/podcast/372-the-rcmps-portapique-narrative-is-falling-apart/?fbclid=IwAR06bHusmV2akKQL93VSkbflNz9EgApVGqkLYADBKV7v6wonaNstP_YAM14

 CANADALAND
#372 The RCMP’s Portapique Narrative Is Falling Apart
Frank Magazine publisher Andrew Douglas and reporter Paul Palango
discuss their bombshell story, and what the RCMP may still be hiding
about Gabriel Wortman.


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html

Wednesday, 29 July 2020
Federal and provincial governments to hold public inquiry into Nova
Scotia mass shootings

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos
Methinks lots of folks may enjoy what Peter Mac Issac and his cohorts
said while the RCMP and a lot of LIEbranos were stuttering and
doubletalking bigtime N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html


 #nbpoli #cdnpoli


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioT6vj0zA_Q&t=3045s


Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government


58,732 views
Streamed live on Jul 27, 2020


Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson
Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government - Peter Mac Issac

 ----------Origiinal message ----------
 From: Peter Mac Isaac <prmibullrun@gmail.com>
 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:42:20 -0300
 Subject: Re: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." Methinks
it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by the Pierre Elliott
 Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

 A lot of info to chew on - every now and then we win one - Today we
 won a partial victory when the provincial liberals threw the federal
 liberals under the bus forcing their hand . Now the spin will be to
 get a judge they can control.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjxatZIus_o


Police Corruption? Nova Scotia Shooter - Behind The Scenes


86,369 views
Streamed live on Jul 28, 2020

Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson
Nova Scotia Shooter Behind The Scenes with Paul Palango a former
senior editor at The Globe and Mail and author of three books on the
RCMP, the most recent being Dispersing the Fog, Inside the Secret
World of Ottawa and the RCMP. His work on the Nova Scotia massacre has
been published in MacLeans and the Halifax Examiner.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Timothy Bousquet <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:41:36 -0300
Subject: Re: fea3
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello, I’m taking a much-needed vacation and will not be responding to
email until August 4. If this is urgent Halifax Examiner business,
please email zane@halifaxexaminer.ca.

Thanks,

Tim Bousquet
Editor
Halifax Examiner

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:43:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re My calls today about Federal Court File #
T-1557-15 Need I say that CBC lawyers such as Sylvie Gadoury and
Judith Harvie will need lawyers to argue me in Federal Court?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 15:42:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html
 
 
 

 


MCC - DAY 53 - MORE SLOP... TIME TO RESEARCH ?

66 watching now
Started streaming 80 minutes ago
3.43K subscribers

 

Top chat

David AmosYou should have followed the money like Palango and I did long ago

 David Amos Palango worked as a fraud investigator for a leading forensic accounting firm In that capacity, he traveled extensively around North America investigating fraud, in which he helped the Mounties

Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@David Amos yet the all seeing all wise Palango didn't see the Rob play coming a mile away unless he was in on the play and it was done purposely to throw out red herrings

David AmosBINGO

David Amos​I butted heads with Palango and his corrupt cop buddies in 2008

 

Julia JonesWhy is Trudeau in Halifax today for closed door meetings

 
 David Amos​Methinks the same reason the RCMP were hanging around in my neck of the woods on Monday spooking my dog 
 

David Amos​Ask Palango what he knows about the demise of RCMP Staff Sergeant Bruce Reid on Friday, October 25, 2019

 

CON-CAN @David Amos when you ask pp something, you have to expect that the answer is a lie
 
David AmosOf course
 
David AmosPerhaps you and I should talk???
 
CON-CAN @David Amos are you talking to me? I'm open to talking to you
 
CON-CAN[message retracted] 
 
J J
why can't one support both, why do we need to put each other down, we all have the same goal in here I do believe. Correct me if I'm wrong

 David AmosYes why not call me one of your friends knows my number

CON-CAN@Little Grey Cells can you check your text messages? 
 
 David Amos​I believe Con--Can is Tara Correct? 
 
 
David AmosWell are you Tara or not?
 
 
Ash LunnI thought con con was a guy that was parolee that was in prison twice? am I wrong? 
 
David AmosEXCUSE ME P MENT TO TYPE CAN
 
David AmosCAN-CON SHOULD KNOW THE LADY WHO SAT WITH TARA RECENTLY CORRECT???
 
SadMafioso@David Amos Con-Can is Tara...
 
David Amos​TRY TELLING ME SOMETHING I DON'T KNOW
 
 
SadMafioso'Feral Kid' Makes me think of the kid with the mullet from Mad Max 2.
 
SadMafiosoI find it interesting that Lisa Banfield forgot about how she recounted the kids "playing dead" when Wortman and her drove by in her MCC statment, but in her testimony she denied know/seeing them..
 
 
cwoodForgot about that sadmafiaso
 
Becca AWhy did the kids play dead is my question
 
David AmosWHY IS SEAMUS PLAYING DUMB IS MY QUESTION
 
SadMafioso@Becca A I dunno, but they allegedly use to play on Wortman's backhoe too. So like, he liked the kids enough to tolerate them at bare minimum. Meanwhile Lisa was super standoffish and contradicted
 
SadMafioso​her earlier statments in her testimony Friday.SadMafiosoher earlier statments in her testimony Friday.
 
 
SadMafioso@David Amos Ah! Tabarnak!
 
Chris LeeI forgot about that too Sad
 
Becca APlaying dumb about what ?
 
David AmosWHO I AM
 
Macdonald DonWho be you ?
 
David AmosPURE D BULLSHIT
 
SadMafioso@David Amos Did you know Tom Evans?
 
Peter Byker@David Amos I watched your video about the NB deputy premier, and the smoking fine he wanted to impose, interesting stuff. on the other hand, throwing darts around like that sucks. please chill.
 
David AmosALL LAWYERS IN FAT FRED CITY KNOW ONE MY CONTACT NUMBERS IS 902 800 0369 EVEN THE DEAD ONES
 
 
David AmosOBVIOUSLY ONE BYKER KNOWS ME N'ESY PAS?
 
 
Donna JjessYes Mr Amos , please don't be rude.Have a nice day.
 
David AmosWHAT WAS RUDE?
 
Donna JjessWhy do you think Seamus is being dumb@Mr.Amos.
 
SadMafiosoSounds a little like a Sugar Daddy situation. Just sayin' n'esy pas.
 
David AmosASK HIM @Donna Jjess 
 
Nosy ScotianDo you live in the hood Seamus? Lots of sirens lately. 
😁
SadMafiosoIt's Lisa McCully that Maloney is talking about. McCully is the only one in this story with a Suburu.
 
David AmosHE ADMITTED RECEIVING MY EMAILS CORRECT??? @SadMafioso 
 
SadMafioso@David Amos I dunno, ask Bill Blair.
 
Becca ADavid, if you have something to say just say it 
 
Donna Jjess@becca I agree
 
David AmosI LET MY DOG OUT IN CASE THE RCMP COME BACK TODAY BECAUSE i HAVE NO DOUBT THEY ARE READING THIS
 
Becca Astop being a
🐈
SadMafioso@Becca A You're offending my two cats.
😉
Becca ALol 
 
David AmosTRUST THAT BIG BAD BILLY BLAIR KNOWS ME QUITE WELL I SUED THE QUEEN BEFORE HE GOT ELECTED
 
David Amos@Becca A ALREADY DONE LONG AGO GOOGLE MY NAME AND FEDERAL COURT FILE NO T-1557-15
 
Becca AWhat does that have to do with lgc 
 
Ash Lunnif it's not connected to april 18-19 2020 the STFU
 
SadMafiosoWhat is 'CIRT'?
 
 
SadMafiosoSiRT* Serious Incident Response Team. But why does the MCC transcripe it as "CERT"? Weird.
 
Ash Lunn@SadMafioso so you cannot search the word SIRT if it is mis-spelled in docs
 
Macdonald DonIsn't it about time to start examining the lives of the RCMP members involved ?
 
NS BluenoseGina thought she will at her home 
 
David AmosYO @Joanne Willoughby WHY NOT GIVE TARA MY CELL NUMBER???
 
nikki lewisshe had cottage five islanmds
 
Liberty Heiress
🤔
NS BluenoseWondering same thing sounds like possibly 
 
SadMafiosoYes, there was speculation that Wortman and Banfield scoped out Goulets cottage in Five Islands the day of April 18th... It's been reported a multitude of times...
 
Ken TriolLOL I misread @David Amos ... I thought it said federal court "feral" and that sounded interesting... but it was "file"

 
David Amos YO @Ken Triol DO YA THINK PALANGO AND HIS BUDDIES IN THE RCMP ARE LAUGHING AT FEDERAL COURT FILE NO T-1557-15????
 
nikki lewiswas chad in PP sat night ?
 
 
SadMafiosoMy links aren't coping up.
 
SadMafiosoIt would be very problematic if Chad Morrison turned out to be Lisa Banfield’s chauffeur... LOL.
 
Ken Triol@David we have been in and out listening to this this morning so I am not sure exactly what you are asking me.. if you could be specific I'd be happy to answer
 
Nosy ScotianWhat a tangled
🕸
Macdonald DonOK, yeah, is a dismissive response...
 
 
NS BluenoseThis just keeps getting worse 
 
David Amos@Ken Triol PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME REAL SLOW WHY YOUR HERO BONAPARTE MADE MOST OF HIS YOUTUBES ON THIS TOPIC GO PRIVATE AFTER MY EMAILS TO SEAMUS ET AL LAST WEEKEND
 
Macdonald DonI vividly remember Leather, out of the blue revealing that Morrison and Heidi had a scheduled 'meet up'....
 
Linda MBonaparte often makes his videos private. Are they on his Patreon?
 
 
Ken Triol@David feel free to send a copy of your email to me in messenger. it may elucidate things for me. because I have no idea at this point what point you are actually trying to make
 
Macdonald DonSadMafioso...Driving Miss Shady...
 
Ken Triol@David when you say things like "real slow".. one is left to assume you are being deliberately rude to someone you don't know and I don't understand exactly why you would do that either
 
SadMafioso@MacDonald Don Lots of overturned log shade for sure.
 
NS BluenoseThey again 
 
Macdonald DonSadMafioso...I wonder if a decomposing tree would give off any warmth
 
Retire Cape Bretonash lun.. the Maloney intel go back to the American indian movement and Anna mae pictou aqquash
 
David Amos@Ken Triol ASK YOUR BUDDY @Little Grey Cells TO FORWARD MY EMAILS TO YOU AFTER ALL HE CLAIMED TODAY THAT HE DID NOT UNDERSTAND THEM & ASKED FOR MORE CORRECT? BETTER YET WHAT NOT JUST CHECK MY BLOG???
 
SadMafiosoI'll take the psy-op abuse and let it put me to sleep.
 
Retire Cape Bretonshe was just asking how Maloney got background check... read up on that one later shaemus
 
 
David Amos@Retire Cape Breton PERHAPS YOU SHOULD ASK ME ABOUT THAT TOPIC
 
.
Julia Jones@david go count sand
 
Retire Cape Bretonelaborate David. interesting read
 
Nosy Scotianmore docs pls
 
Ash Lunnsomeone shot on scene of CSI today. murdered. 
 
Linda MYes, knowing your own power @SadMafioso 
 
SadMafiosoSUGGESTION!
 
SadMafiosoBefore you shut it down, I have an idea.
 
David Amos@Retire Cape Breton ASK YOURSELF WHY I AGAINST THE MINISTER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS IN 2006
 
Ken TriolI like listening to @lgc also like to listen to nighttime I would be happy to listen to you if I understood what youre trying to say but your catastrophic typing is very distracting & bereft of facts
 
 
David AmosCALL ME SEAMUS
 
 
Peter Byker@Seamus, Will this comment box be available after the stream?? here's hoping, cheers
 
Retire Cape BretonDavid. lil confused. can u recommend reading
 
SadMafiosoSo like, most of us have jobs and responsibilities. So like, what if we record ourselves reading statements and upload our own MP3s so we all can listen to them as we work on other things? So like,
 
Nosy ScotianVery weird vibe. My guts jumped until Saturday afternoon
 
SadMafiosowe make statments more accessible.
 
 
David AmosCALL ME @Retire Cape Breton NOBODY EADS ANYTHING I SEND
 
 
SadMafioso@CON-CAN
😆
 Retire Cape BretonI'm not calling you lmaoo
 
SadMafiosoJust record audio and upload to YouTube?
 
Ash LunnGuy was shot and murdered on the se of CSI today in NY think
 
SadMafiosoYeah, we probably could assign statements to vintners to read out loud.
 
SadMafiosovolunteers*
 
David Amos@Retire Cape Breton CALL 1 902 800 0369 LEAVE A MESSAGE AND I WILL CALL BACK
 
 
SadMafioso@CON-CAN Also a good idea
 
.
David AmosMETHINKS THERE ARE FEDS WITHIN THIS CHAT AND THE HINT THAT I WAS COINTEL WAS NOT NICE N'ESY PAS?
 
SadMafiosoIf we can learn to mechanized the process, we can make it more accessible to the masses.
 
Macdonald DonIf you use youtube, make sure you back everything up..
  
.
David Amos@Ash Lunn THATS AN UNDERSTATEMENT
 
David Amos@Little Grey Cells YOU RECORDED LEON IN HIS OWN WORDS PERHAPS YOU SHOULD DO THE SAME WITH ME EH???
 
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFcointel pro agents ride the subway carrying ducks
 
SadMafiosoI'd agree with @Oh Dear 💯

SadMafiosoOnly like 90 pages a piece... LOL
 
David Amos@Little Grey Cells WHY DO YOU CONTINUE TO PLAY DUMB???

SadMafiosoTake care, I'll catch up from the morning tonight.
 
 
David Amos@Little Grey Cells DO YOU RECALL WHEN I FIRST CONTACTED YOU???
 
Linda MHave a great day @CON-CAN Do you make sleigh beds? lol
 
 
 
 

 

 



MCC - DAY 55 - ... AND PARTICIPANT SUBMISSIONS

$
0
0

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Public Editor, The Toronto Star"<publiced@thestar.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:10:05 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the RCMP, Palango and even Andy
Baby Douglas should understand why I am saving certain comments within
the live chat in this video by their pal Seamus N'esy Pas
David.Lametti?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

THANK YOU for contacting the Toronto Star Public Editor's office.

This office handles queries about  accuracy and the Star's
journalistic standards as set out in its Newsroom Policy and
Journalistic Standards Guide

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IG0CQmoTPkQ 

 

MCC Day 52 – Panel on Personal and Community Responses to IPV, GBV, and Family Violence

386 views
Jul 21, 2022
674 subscribers
The MCC today featured a panel discussion on “IPV, GBV and Family Violence: Personal and Community Responses”, and featured Pamela Cross, Legal Director, Luke's Place Support and Resource Centre, Dr. Deborah Doherty, former Executive Director of the Public Legal Education and Information Service of New Brunswick, Emma Halpern, Executive Director, Elizabeth Fry Society of Mainland NS, Professor Janet Mosher from Osgoode Hall Law School, Lorraine Whitman, President of the Native Women Association of Canada, and Dr. Rachel Zellars, Associate Professor, Saint Mary's University. 
 
This represented the eighth MCC discussion focused on domestic violence. Several of the panelists referenced the previous panel discussions, stating that they supported the submissions made so far. It is noteworthy that this panel, like every other IPV/GPV discussion held so far, was made up entirely of women. 
 
Those who have been watching the MCC proceedings will have noted that the Commissioners start each day with a land acknowledgment. Today, there was an additional solemn and/or ceremonial prayer-like introduction, which was lead by Ms. Whitman. Everyone in the room stood for this. Another thing that stood out in the ‘presentation’ element of what the MCC was hosting today was the highly visible sticker on the back of Ms. Cross’ laptop. The sticker was for “Thelma & Louise Live”, which is a play based on the 1991 movie. 
 
Those two items foretold the tone and content of the discussion, which was emotional (for the speakers) at times as they described many stories of abuse suffered by women in a wide range of circumstances. Discussions covered women suffering abuse who were also struggling with racism, their precarious immigration status, drug additions, sex work, and rural living.

12 Comments

David Amos
Methinks you and even Stevey Boy Murphy would have found it far more interesting watching Seamus and his buddies having fun as two interesting ladies embarrassed the hell out of the Commission and the DOJ lawyer Patricia MacPhee N'esy Pas ?
 
 
 
Jean Mac Aulay
Thank You Adam for your insight into the proceeding today at the MCC. So much time and money spent on these round table discussions.
 
 
EVELYN D. RAMSAY
Glad to see that Steve Murphy spoke out last nite at news time on Lisa Banfield not being cross examined! He said more in 5 min than the MCC has! Maybe give Steve the millions to investigate this! The MCC can certainly addressed the domestic violence factor to the ith degree and even the effects of childhood abuse on GW, heck bring in his Dad, but its to the point where its " sooo obvious" that they are shoving this to the forefront, instead of focusing on how we can speak up earlier and prevent from happening and what caused this and steps to prevent it. 1st it was " Honor the RCMP for bravery" and when that blew up, now its " Lisa and DV " and heck maybe the next topic is " Our politicians, who failed to speak up, need more training"! Any of them out on PTSD stress leave yet? How about lazer focus on the crime, how it was allowed to happen, how did the border fail, who's responsible in Maine, who all knew about the police cars, has GW killed before, what all did Lisa know, what was the fight really about and where was she all night and why didn't the RCMP take photos or test her. Time to get real. The only time I've seen any true action is when devasted Nick spoke up and he was rudely told no more outbursts! So they yell at Nick, and Lisa is treated like a China doll thats delicate and breakable. Maybe time for NS people to protest on the street and create some news.
 
David Amos
In all sincerity I wonder how many snobby sheople sleep at night
 
 
 
darrenm01
Gender based violence? Victims were 60% women and 40% men - Wortman’s spouse lived (one of the only people who did that encountered the mass shooter).That I’m aware of, the shooting didn’t involve any First Nations or African Nova Scotians, or immigrants, and didn’t involve children.Did the MCC get a blank check to bring in experts to talk about their specific areas of interest with no connection to the mass shooting?Is it stated anywhere what the actual purpose of the commission is? It seems to have lost focus and can’t possibly cover every topic unrelated to the mass shooting.
 
tony flapperjack
They’re employing a particular sociological lens and calling it a day
 
Kathleen Maguire
@darrenm01 I asked almost the exact questions the other day? What is their mandate? And by the mounting costs of this commission, I think they do have a BLANK CHEQUE!!!
 
David Amos
 @Kathleen Maguire  @darrenm01 AMEN
 
 
 
cyndi
Nothing wrong with a little bit of Jesus being invited in on these fool! He ll make them tell the truth!!
 
David Amos
Yea Right

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFNEKqVYzcs 

 

MCC - DAY 55 - ... AND PARTICIPANT SUBMISSIONS

797 views
Streamed live 15 hours ago
3.43K subscribers
David Amos
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:07:44 -0300 
Subject: Methinks the RCMP, Palango and even Andy Baby Douglas shouldunderstand why I am saving certain comments within the live chat inthis video by their pal Seamus N'esy Pas David.Lametti? 
 
This lady was far more interesting today than the mindless Jan Jensen ever was 
 
Patricia C. MacPhee 
 Called to the bar: 1999 (NS) 
Justice CanadaNational Litigation Sector, 
 
MCC - DAY 55 - ... AND PARTICIPANT SUBMISSIONS 
113 watching now 
Started streaming 2 hours ago 
 Little Grey Cells 
3.43K subscribers 
 
Top ChatWelcome to live chat! Remember to guard your privacy and abide by ourcommunity guidelines.
 
 
 
 
Chiang Love
I missed so much today. Hopefully I’ll catch up on the weekend.Thank you to all of you searching for the unvarnished truth. You know who you are and you totally rock! A special thank you to you Seamus, for putting in so much time and effort!
 
 
 
Ken Triol
Lol 😆 that comment about MCC not taking an ill advised vaycay was my adorable spouse.
 
 
 
cyndi
So lb needs to collect on policy, so the report says his shot didn't kill him, so not suicide

 

 

 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Public Editor, The Toronto Star"<publiced@thestar.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:10:05 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the RCMP, Palango and even Andy
Baby Douglas should understand why I am saving certain comments within
the live chat in this video by their pal Seamus N'esy Pas
David.Lametti?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

THANK YOU for contacting the Toronto Star Public Editor's office.

This office handles queries about  accuracy and the Star's
journalistic standards as set out in its Newsroom Policy and
Journalistic Standards Guide

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2011/12/07/toronto_star_newsroom_policy_and_journalistic_standards_guide.html

The public editor's office is staffed Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., by Public Editor Bruce Campion-Smith and Public Editor,
Associate, Maithily Panchalingam.

If you are requesting a correction or questioning journalistic
standards, please send a link or details of where you read the article
you are questioning, (e.g.- date, page number, digital device.) Please
include your full name and a telephone number where we can reach you
for further information if necessary. Unfortunately, due to the volume
of emails we receive, we cannot reply to every email, but we do read
them all, consider carefully the issues raised, and take appropriate
action to attempt to resolve complaints in cases of error or breach of
the Star's standards.

Some messages to the public editor may be published in Bruce
Campion-Smith's public editor column, which explores journalistic
issues raised by readers. Please inform us if you do not want your
message published.

Corrections:  The public editor's office looks into claims of error on
any and all platforms on which the  Star publishes. The Star corrects
significant errors of fact. When we determine a correction is called
for, it will be published as soon as possible; the article will also
be corrected online and a correction appended. Generally, news
corrections are published on page A2 and corrections for other
sections (including Sports, Entertainment and Life)  are published in
those sections. Corrections are also published online:
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/corrections

Because many readers often point out the same error, we cannot notify
each person that we are publishing a correction. As well, because of
the volume of queries we receive, we are not always able to respond to
explain why we determined no correction is necessary. Every query
about a possible error is considered thoroughly however. We  thank all
readers  who take the time to help the Star report accurately.

Unpublishing: Generally, the Star does not delete (unpublish) content
from our websites or archives, except in some rare circumstances
following consultation with the editor-in-chief, managing editor, and
in some cases, legal counsel. In the case of verified errors, we will
correct/update the article and/or append corrections as necessary but
will not remove it from the Star' s digital  publishing record.

General feedback about coverage: If you are writing to express your
view of the Star's coverage, your message will be forwarded to the
appropriate department. Because of the volume of email we receive,
neither the public editor's office, nor the journalists in specific
departments, can respond to every reader comment about the Star's
coverage.

Letters to the Editor: If you want your comments expressing your view
considered for publication as a Letter to the Editor, please resend
your message to lettertoed@thestar.ca<mailto:lettertoed@thestar.ca>.
Letters must include full name, address and all phone numbers of
sender (daytime, evening and cellphone). Street names and phone
numbers will not be published. The Star reserves the right to edit
letters, which typically run 50-150 words. Please note: The Star
receives many more letters than it has  space to print. Due to the
volume, we unfortunately cannot acknowledge every submission.

Submissions to the Star: Commentaries, opinion pieces, story pitches
and press releases should be submitted to the section of the Star to
which they are best suited. A full list of departments is published on
the "Contact Us" page of the Star's website:
https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

How to reach a Star journalist: Most staff members, including
reporters, editors, columnists and photographers, can be reached by
email. In most cases the email address follows this formula (all lower
case, don't type spaces or the plus sign): first initial + last name
@thestar.ca. You can also reach staff in the Editorial department
(newsroom) via phone at 416-869-4300 or fax at 416-869-4328. Editorial
staff members can also be contacted within the department they work
for. To reach a freelance writer, please contact the section in which
his or her article appeared.

Subscriptions/Customer Service: The public editor's office handles
concerns about editorial content only.  For home delivery
subscriptions, delivery problems, billing inquiries and other customer
service matters, please email
circmail@thestar.ca<mailto:circmail@thestar.ca>. You may also go to
our Subscription page<http://www.thestar.com/about/subscribe.html> for
home delivery information.

Further information about how to contact other departments in the Star
can be found here: https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

Thank you for reading your Toronto Star.

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 00:13:56 -0300
Subject: Re: Methinks folks should tune in and listen to Paul Palango
and his all knowing pumpkin before the show goes "Poof" N'esy Pas?
To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.

fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Sean.Fraser"
<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>,
"mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Moiz.Karimjee"<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>,
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, andrew
<andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "darren.campbell"
<darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Gorman"
<Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, "michael.macdonald"
<michael.macdonald@thecanadianpress.com>, "Rhonda.Brown"
<Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, jesse
<jesse@viafoura.com>, publiced@thestar.ca, newsroom@therecord.com,
stevemckinley@thestar.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:50:02 +0000
Subject: FRANK MAGAZINE TODAY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


FRANK MAGAZINE JULY 20, 2022


THE LOCKYER FACTOR


by Paul Palango



If you haven’t already noticed, something truly strange happened on
the road to finding the truth about what actually happened before,
during and after the Nova Scotia massacres of April 18 and 19, 2020.
Lisa Banfield and her $1,200-an-hour lawyer, James Lockyer, appear to
have been controlling the show from the very beginning. The Lockyer
factor as a not-so-hidden influencer on the news is important to
address.
On April 19, 2020, just hours after Lisa Banfield arrived at the door
of Leon Joudrey, she contacted lawyer Kevin von Bargen in Toronto to
seek advice and help. The lawyer, a friend of Wortman and Banfield,
put her onto James Lockyer.
From that moment forward, her every word has been treated as gospel.
By the RCMP, by the Mass Casualty Commission, and by the compliant
media. Even those who believe her to have been a victim of domestic
violence at the hands of Gabriel Wortman (and she clearly was), but
also believe she might know more than she’s letting on — and that what
she knows might be important to the inquiry’s purported fact-finding
mission — have been dismissed as cranks and conspiracists.
According to financial documents released by the inquiry after Lisa
Banfield’s dramatic “testimony” on July 15, Banfield reported earnings
of $15,288 one recent year.
That would cover a day, plus HST, of Lockyer’s valuable time.
He has been on the clock for 27 months or so, his fees covered by
taxpayers through the Mass Casualty Commission.
Banfield’s finances, such as they are, would have been a juicy subject
for any curious lawyer, but she wasn’t allowed to be cross examined.
Too traumatic, remember.
Questions abound.
Why did Banfield hire an esteemed criminal lawyer? Did no one let her
in on her status as a victim?
Lockyer seems like an exotic choice. He made his name from the early
‘90s onward representing men wrongly convicted of murder, such as
Stephen Truscott, David Milgaard, Robert Baltovich and Guy Paul Morin.
Morin was falsely accused of killing 9-year-old Christine Jessop in
Queensville, Ontario, near Toronto.
I was the city editor at the Globe and Mail then. I was intimately
involved in the story which was being covered by one of our reporters,
Kirk Makin. I even at one point had a meeting with Makin and Morin’s
mother, who protested his innocence. At the time I was wrongly unmoved
and skeptical of her story, but Makin persisted in digging into it and
worked closely with Lockyer. Morin was eventually exonerated. Kudos to
all. I hope I got smarter after that.
Lockyer, who lived a block away from me in Toronto, went on to become
a champion of the wrongly convicted and started the Innocence Project
to work on their behalf. Among his many clients was Rubin (Hurricane)
Carter, the former boxer who was wrongly convicted of three murders in
Paterson, NJ and was the inspiration for the 1976 Bob Dylan epic
Hurricane.
In recent years, Lockyer and his Innocence Project became involved in
the case of Nova Scotia’s Glenn Assoun, who was wrongly convicted in
1999 of murdering Brenda Way in Dartmouth four years earlier.
Lockyer worked along with lawyers Sean MacDonald and Phil Campbell to
have Assoun’s conviction overturned after he had spent 17 years in
prison. In the final years of that campaign an activist reporter named
Tim Bousquet took on the Assoun case and wrote about it extensively
for years, channeling and publicizing what the lawyers and their
investigators had uncovered. To his credit Bousquet uncovered some
things on his own.
Perhaps the biggest revelation in the Assoun case was that the RCMP
had destroyed evidence and had mislead the courts about Assoun.
Bousquet joined with the CBC in 2020 and produced a radio series, Dead
Wrong, about the case. As Canadians should know well by now, both the
federal and Nova Scotia governments ignored what the Mounties were
caught doing.
Fast forward to the Nova Scotia massacres and the news coverage of it.
As I wrote in my recent book, 22 Murders: Investigating the Massacres,
Cover-up and Obstacles to Justice In Nova Scotia, I had a brief fling
with Bousquet and his on-line newspaper, The Halifax Examiner, in
2020.
After publishing an opening salvo in Maclean’s magazine in May 2020, I
couldn’t find anyone else interested in my reporting, which challenged
the official narrative. Maclean’s writer Stephen Maher introduced me
to Bousquet. I knew nothing about either him or the Halifax Examiner.
Over the next several weeks, Bousquet published five of my pieces and
I was pleasantly surprised to find that the Examiner punched well
above its weight. Its stories were being picked up and read across the
country. Although I had never met the gruff and the usually
difficult-to-reach Bousquet, I thought we had a mutual interest in
keeping the story alive as the mainstream media was losing interest in
it and were moving on. At first blush, Bousquet seemed like a true,
objective journalist determined to find the truth. Hell, I was even
prepared to work for nothing, just to get the story out.
“I have to pay you, man,” he insisted in one phone call.
I felt badly taking money from him. I had no idea what his company’s
financial situation might be, and I didn’t want to break the bank. He
said he could pay me $300 or so per story and asked me to submit an
invoice, which I did.
Soon afterward, a cheque for $1500 arrived. I cashed it and then my
wife Sharon and I sent him $500 each in after tax money as a donation.
Like I said, I didn’t want to be a drag on the Examiner.
Once we made the donations, Bousquet all but ghosted me. He was always
too busy to take my calls or field my pitches. I couldn’t tell if I
was being cancelled or had been conned.
I began to replay events in my head and the one thing that leapt out
to me was Bousquet’s defensive and even dismissive reaction to two
threads I thought were important and newsworthy which I wanted to
write about.
One was the politically sensitive issue of writing objectively about
all the women in the story. There were female victims who had slept
with Wortman, which I though was contextually important in
understanding the larger story. Bousquet had made it clear that he
wasn’t eager for me to write about that. (Be trauma informed!-ed.)
There was also the fact that female police officers were at the
intersection of almost every major event that terrible weekend. The
commanding officer was Leona (Lee) Bergerman. Chief Superintendent
Janis Gray was in charge of the RCMP in Halifax County. Inspector
Dustine Rodier ran the communications centre. It was a long list that
will continue to grow.
I believe in equal pay for work of equal value but that comes with
equal accountability for all. I am gender neutral when evaluating
performance.
But it didn’t take psychic powers to detect that gender politics was a
big issue with Bousquet – his target market, as it were.
I really wanted to write about Banfield. My preliminary research
strongly suggested to me her story was riddled with weakness and
inconsistency, but nobody in the mainstream media would tackle it.
Hell, for months her name wasn’t even published anywhere outside the
pages of Frank magazine.
Bousquet’s position was that Banfield was a victim of domestic
violence and that her story, via vague, second-hand and untested RCMP
statements, was to be believed. No questions asked.
“You’re going to need something really big to convince me otherwise,”
Bousquet said in one of our brief conversations.
Afterward, I did have one face-to-face meeting with him in Halifax. He
actually sat in the back seat of our car because Sharon was in the
front. We met up because I wanted to tell him about sensitive leads I
had which, if pursued, would show that the RCMP had the ability to
manipulate its records and destroy evidence in its PROs reporting
system.
Considering his involvement in the Assoun case, where that very issue
was at the heart of Assoun’s exoneration, I thought Bousquet would be
eager to pursue the story.
As I looked at him in the rearview mirror, I could sense his
discomfort and lack of interest. So could Sharon who was sitting
beside me.
“That was weird,” she said.
Bousquet got out of the car, walked away and disappeared me for good.
It was all so inexplicable. If this was the new journalism that I was
experiencing, there was something terribly wrong with it. I couldn’t
believe that a journalist like Bousquet who aspired to be a
truthteller felt compelled to distill every word or nuance through a
political filter first or even something more nefarious.
Later, while writing for Frank Magazine, I broke story after story
about the case. Incontrovertible documents showing that the RCMP was
destroying evidence in the Wortman case. The Pictou County Public
Safety channel recordings showing for the first time what the RCMP was
doing on the ground during the early morning hours of April 19. The
911 tapes. The Enfield Big Stop videos. That Lisa Banfield lied in
small claims court on two different occasions.
Bousquet either ignored or ridiculed most of those stories in the
Halifax Examiner or on his Twitter feed, as if I were making the
stories up.
For the most part throughout 2021, the Halifax Examiner didn’t even
bother covering the larger story. There was no discernible legwork or
energy being expended on it. And regarding the stories he did publish,
I began to see a pattern. Naïve readers might have thought that he was
digging for new stories when in fact the Examiner was merely mining
court documents and uncritically reporting what resided therein. It
was all stenography, straight from the mouths of the RCMP and the MCC.
Time and time again, “new” stories would be published which were
essentially no different from previous ones but all with the same
theme: as Ray Davies of the Kinks put it in his masterpiece Sunny
Afternoon: “Tales of drunkenness and cruelty.”
The Monster and the Maiden stories, as I called them, reinforced in
readers' minds that Banfield was a helpless victim controlled by a
demonic Wortman, a narrative that, upon reflection, seemed to
perfectly suit Lockyer’s strategy.
For 27 months the RCMP and the Mass Casualty Commission played along,
sheltering Banfield as part of their “trauma-informed” mandate, even
though there was plenty to be skeptical about her story.
Banfield was beside Wortman for 19 years during which he committed
crime after crime. She was reportedly the last person to be with
Wortman and her incredible, hoary tale of escape should have been
enough to raise suspicions about her.
From the moment she knocked on Leon Joudrey’s door she has been
treated as a victim, which to this day astounds law enforcement
experts and others who have monitored the case. Many observers,
including but not limited to lawyers representing the families of the
victims, have serious questions about how Banfield spent the overnight
hours of April 18/19. Not helping matters is that she doesn’t appear
to have been subjected to any level of normal criminal investigation
or evidence gathering. Her clothing wasn’t tested. There were no
gunshot residue tests. She wasn’t subjected to a polygraph or any
other credible investigative procedure.
 Enter James Lockyer of the Innocence Project.

The puppetification of Tim Bousquet

As we moved closer to July 15, the day that Banfield would be
“testifying” at the MCC, it is also important to consider what
Bousquet and his minions were doing at the Halifax Examiner.
In the weeks and days leading up to Banfield’s appearance, the
Examiner’s reporting and Bousquet’s Twitter commentary began to take
on an illogical, more contemptuous and even hostile approach to anyone
who refused to buy into the RCMP and Banfield’s official version of
events.
In a series of hilariously one-sided diatribes, Bousquet lashed out at
Banfield’s critics whom he wouldn’t name. Some (likely us) were
“bad-faith actors.” He decried the “witchification” of Banfield.
He tweeted: “And just to repeat for the 1000th time: I’ve read
transcripts of interviews with dozens of people. I’ve read three
years’ of emails between Banfield and GW. I’ve read her Notes app.
There is ZERO evidence that she had any prior knowledge (of) GW’s
intent to kill people…. The notion that she is ‘complicit’ is pulled
out of people’s diarrhetic asses and plain old-fashioned misogyny.”
Oh, misogyny, that old woke slimeball to be hurled at any male who
dare be critical of any female.
One can’t help but sense the deft hand of a clever and experienced
defence lawyer running up the back of Bousquet’s shirt. That makes
sense.
Look at what has transpired on Lockyer’s watch.
Since April 2020, the RCMP and the federal and provincial governments
have wrapped themselves in a single, vague and inappropriate platitude
– trauma informed.
The original selling point was that this approach would prevent the
surviving family members from being further traumatized by the ongoing
“investigation” into the massacres.
What actually happened is much more sinister.
Lisa Banfield was coddled and protected the entire time not only by
the authorities but also by Lockyer’s friends in the mass media. The
wily old fox had the opportunity to mainline his thoughts into the
Globe and Mail, the Toronto Star, the CBC, CTV and Global News who
unquestioningly lapped it up.
At the MCC, Banfield wasn’t allowed to be cross examined because, as
Mr. Lockyer so eloquently explained, cross examination would just lead
to more conspiracy theories.
That’s rich.
The search for the truth will only confuse matters -- it’s better for
everyone that Banfield spin a much-rehearsed tale without challenge.
That’s clearly a $1,200-an-hour lawyer speaking.
The whole world has gone topsy-turvy. The Mass Casualty Commission,
the federal and provincial governments, the RCMP and Lisa Banfield are
now aligned on one side of the argument.
Meanwhile, the re-traumatized families find themselves agreeing with
this magazine and other skeptics and critics.
The final irony is that the Halifax Examiner bills itself as being
“independent” and “adversarial.” It seems to be neither these days.
In the end, Tim Bousquet’s approach to covering the Nova Scotia
Massacres is, to use his words: “Dead Wrong.”


paulpalango@protonmail.com


Paul Palango is author of the best selling book 22 Murders:
Investigating the massacres, cover-up and obstacles to justice in Nova
Scotia (Random House).




--
Andrew Douglas
Frank Magazine
phone: (902) 420-1668
fax: (902) 423-0281
cell: (902) 221-0386
andrew@frankmagazine.ca
www.frankmagazine.ca




Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

------- Original Message -------
On Sunday, July 17th, 2022 at 9:25 PM, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:


> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pbqoVpBnHQ&ab_channel=NighttimePodcast
>
>
> the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 17, 2022
> 379 watching now
> Started streaming 67 minutes ago
> Nighttime Podcast
> 7.5K subscribers
> Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice memo at
> nighttimepodcast.com/contact
>
> Live chat
>
> nikki lewisShe would have to prove zero negligence to the act
> Anne Marie EvansNighttime, hope you got my voice memo
> nikki lewisBut it’s possible she could claim all
> nikki lewisLol yeah nosy ☺
> BrendanAgreed. Banfield should have been questioned many times as
> should family members of theirs.
> Jmnl1199Did anyone notice Friday , Lisa’s sister the blonde one.
> Would nudge Lisa off and on with some questions
> nikki lewisEvery Damn witness should have given testimony in this sham
> Nosy ScotianWe'll have to compare horror stories sometime Nikki 😁
> Milkshaker69I don’t mean to judge.. but Lisa looks a lot more
> “weathered” than his sisters
> Julia RockJmnl1199 yes.
> Ash Lunnif LB signed any contract like a prenup like she says she did
> then wouldn't that still be ineffect?
> Ash Lunnthen again Wartman supposedly wrote a new will end of march
> 2020, unless that will is faked?
> Bushbaby _627Lisa’s video and some of her answers were word for word
> Christine WFor a person that hasn’t been able to sleep in over two
> years she looked well groomed ? Who’s her team?
> BrendanDid Wort have a will? Would his property be subject to seizure
> by the government?
> Jmnl1199Milkshaker69 yes I noticed she did, booze life she loved with
> him, then her stress after all this for 2 years I would say she is
> wearing it
> Ash Lunnwartman wills, one in oct 2007 and a new one done march 29th
> 2020 just before rampage
> Caper
> Evening folks
> Ryan
> there are 3 Wortman wills plus a prenup
> Chris LeeYa looking a bit like the goalie for the high school dart team lol
> BrendanInteresting, I can't remember if that info was in Paul's book.
> Ryan
> i''ll do a thread in the FB group and twitter if you guys want
> Jmnl1199He signed everything over to her didn’t he? Then she said she
> wanted nothing, changed her mind now wants
> Nosy Scotianshe didn't have her botox done that's all
> Ash Lunn@Ryan I saw in Comms only two listed?
> Caper
> Excellent Ryan thank you
> Nighttime Podcastk, I'm getting voicememo's for @Ryan now!
> Nighttime Podcasthaha
> Ash Lunn@Ryan yes plz, I want to see that, you rock
> wild foxi love you peeps
> Retire Cape Bretonanother performance art piece from palango?
> Ryan
> @Nighttime Podcast better late than never lol
> Anne Marie EvansNighttime-I sent one for Adam but it's best suited
> for Paul, should I send a new one
> Ash LunnI see kiplings statements on MCC the links are not working yet?
> Nighttime Podcastno it's fine @Anne Marie Evans , I will use it np
> nikki lewisyes please do a thread on that @ryan
> Ryan
> @Nighttime Podcast lol what? i thought you meant i called in last minute lol
> Nighttime Podcastno, straight up vm about you
> SMACwas 2 Five Islands Last year camping it was the darkest place
> ever when there was no moon.can't imagine going through the woods on
> hands &knees & not having my knee caps cut several &my hands ripped
> Ryan
> @Nighttime Podcast oh jeez
> SMACthe dead wood alone is very sharp
> Julia RockAnd barefoot @sMAC
> SMACI call Bullsh!t
> Christine WI wished in the reenactment she crawled a bit though the
> woods …. she had a hard time walking
> Ash Lunnur getting famous @Ryan lol
> SMAC@Jmnl1199 I caught the nudges that maureen was giving Lisa...I
> thought that the sister were more upset then she was...she never shed
> a tear
> 2bskorDid the whole route on the way back from Parrsboro today. Even
> stopped at the fire station.
> Lynn MShe was whispering to Maureen as well
> NS44Lisa "Houdini" Banfield.
> Julia RockCopperfield.
> Ash LunnTeflon LuLumon
> Lynn MDB Cooper
> Jmnl1199@smac that’s what I felt as well, then my mind went somewhere
> else. Wonder if she was with him as well on her sister
> 2bskorNo way that was done on a whim. It had to be planned
> Char DayzFrom where I was sitting I didn’t see the nudges. It’s
> probably best I didn’t notice 😡
> Ash Lunn@Char Dayz nudges and whispers answers to lisa from Maureen
> all the first half
> Jmnl1199@char days it was often
> Darrell Currie@2bskor you should have reached out. I would have given
> you the grand tour of where all the bullet holes are.
> Steve TracyWhen does the live stream start?
> Char DayzI guess I was too busy staring at Lisa, totally missed it.
> Lynn MWhatever happened to the caller that called a few times
> @nighttime ? He was an ex cop or something ?
> Patrick PenneyAdam Rodgers says he is one of top lawyers in Canada
> there was a game plan . and to boot no cross examination was free
> money for her lawyer
> Christine WDidn’t care for McDonald’s statements at the end … how
> great a support they are to her … 🤔🤔
> 2bskor@darrell Currie I will next time I go away for the weekend in
> august. Thanks!
> nikki lewisMacdonald needs to crawl back under his rock
> JayPlant pussy willows😜
> Rustyshelterin
> Mizz FoxxLisa used the charges to get out of really testifying and
> she used the presumption of testifying to get out of charges. She
> played the system. Professional victim
> Retire Cape Bretonpalangos performance art
> Robert BrackenI've seldom seen RCMP cruisers on highway 12.
> SMACI get that the silentparolwindow wasput inby GW but hewas very
> meticulous i the details I am sure that he made itfool proofI am sure
> that ther are some criminalsthat would like 2 know how she did that
> Julia RockMizz foxx absolutely.
> Sir Toast IIII drive highway everyday in morning and at night I see
> them all the time
>
> Subscribers-only mode. Messages that appear are from people who
> subscribe to this channel.

 




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:07:44 -0300
Subject: Methinks the RCMP, Palango and even Andy Baby Douglas should
understand why I am saving certain comments within the live chat in
this video by their pal Seamus N'esy Pas David.Lametti?
To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Sean.Fraser"
<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>,
"mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Moiz.Karimjee"<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>,
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, andrewjdouglas
<andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "darren.campbell"
<darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Gorman"
<Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, "michael.macdonald"
<michael.macdonald@thecanadianpress.com>, "Rhonda.Brown"
<Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, jesse
<jesse@viafoura.com>, publiced@thestar.ca, newsroom@therecord.com,
stevemckinley@thestar.ca, Dwayne.King@masscasualtycommission.ca,
"ian.fahie"<ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Anita.Anand"<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"
<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Oliver"<Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, Norman Traversy
<traversy.n@gmail.com>, "nick.brown"<nick.brown@gnb.ca>, "Alex.Vass"
<Alex.Vass@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>,
"pierre.poilievre"<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
Patricia.MacPhee@justice.gc.ca, "Candice.Bergen"
<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
pmacphee@justice.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, andrew
<andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>,
NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>

This lady was far more interesting today than the mindless Jan Jensen ever was

Patricia C. MacPhee
Called to the bar: 1999 (NS)
Justice Canada
Legal ounsel
National Litigation Sector, Duke Twr.
1400-5251 Duke St.
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1P3
Phone: 902-426-7914
Fax: 902-426-1351

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KFNEKqVYzcs&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells

 

MCC - DAY 55 - ... AND PARTICIPANT SUBMISSIONS

113 watching now
Started streaming 2 hours ago
3.43K subscribers

Top Chat

Welcome to live chat! Remember to guard your privacy and abide by our community guidelines.

 

Robert KlinckAny comments from these experts on the fact that governments employ specialists in behavioural psychology for the purpose of manipulating public opinion? Regarding wars, COVID, climate, etc.
 
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 00:25:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.

On 7/17/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2022/07/spouse-of-ns-mass-shooter-shows-how.html
>
> Thursday, 14 July 2022
>
> Spouse of N.S. mass shooter shows how deadly rampage began in video
> re-enactment
>
> Methinks the very lazy corrupt media sheople love to republish Mikey
> MacDonald's spin on the Mass Casualty Commission Bullshit then polish
> the turd with their 2 bits worth. Others just use their photos and
> write their own spin.
>
> Hence they should not complain that I do the same within my Blog in
> light of the fact I duly notified them of  what I have been up to for
> many years N'esy Pas?
> Deja Vu Anyone??
>
>
>  ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Public Editor, The Toronto Star"<publiced@thestar.ca>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 17:21:56 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Paul Manly I guess you have to rely on the lawyers
> such as Melanie Joly and Elizbeth May or the RCMP to explain why I
> just called
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> THANK YOU for contacting the Toronto Star Public Editor's office.
> This office handles queries about  accuracy and the Star's
> journalistic standards as set out in its Newsroom Policy and
> Journalistic Standards Guide
> https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2011/12/07/toronto_star_newsroom_policy_and_journalistic_standards_guide.html
>
> The public editor's office is staffed Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5
> p.m., by Public Editor Kathy English and Public Editor, Associate,
> Maithily Panchalingam.
>
> If you are requesting a correction or questioning journalistic
> standards, please send a link or details of where you read the article
> you are questioning, (e.g.- date, page number, digital device.) Please
> include your full name and a telephone number where we can reach you
> for further information if necessary. Unfortunately, due to the volume
> of emails we receive, we cannot reply to every email, but we do read
> them all, consider carefully the issues raised, and take appropriate
> action to attempt to resolve complaints in cases of error or breach of
> the Star's standards.
>
> Some messages to the public editor may be published in Kathy English's
> public editor column, which explores journalistic issues raised by
> readers. Please inform us if you do not want your message published.
>
> Corrections:  The public editor's office looks into claims of error on
> any and all platforms on which the  Star publishes. The Star corrects
> significant errors of fact. When we determine a correction is called
> for, it will be published as soon as possible; the article will also
> be corrected online and a correction appended. Generally, news
> corrections are published on page A2 and corrections for other
> sections (including Sports, Entertainment and Life)  are published in
> those sections. Corrections are also published online:
> https://www.thestar.com/opinion/corrections
> Because many readers often point out the same error, we cannot notify
> each person that we are publishing a correction. As well, because of
> the volume of queries we receive, we are not always able to respond to
> explain why we determined no correction is necessary. Every query
> about a possible error is considered thoroughly however. We  thank all
> readers  who take the time to help the Star report accurately.
> Unpublishing: Generally, the Star does not delete (unpublish) content
> from our websites or archives, except in some rare circumstances
> following consultation with the editor-in-chief, managing editor, and
> in some cases, legal counsel. In the case of verified errors, we will
> correct/update the article and/or append corrections as necessary but
> will not remove it from the Star' s digital  publishing record.
> General feedback about coverage: If you are writing to express your
> view of the Star's coverage, your message will be forwarded to the
> appropriate department. Because of the volume of email we receive,
> neither the public editor's office, nor the journalists in specific
> departments, can respond to every reader comment about the Star's
> coverage.
> Letters to the Editor: If you want your comments expressing your view
> considered for publication as a Letter to the Editor, please resend
> your message to lettertoed@thestar.ca<mailto:lettertoed@thestar.ca>.
> Letters must include full name, address and all phone numbers of
> sender (daytime, evening and cellphone). Street names and phone
> numbers will not be published. The Star reserves the right to edit
> letters, which typically run 50-150 words. Please note: The Star
> receives many more letters than it has  space to print. Due to the
> volume, we unfortunately cannot acknowledge every submission.
> Submissions to the Star: Commentaries, opinion pieces, story pitches
> and press releases should be submitted to the section of the Star to
> which they are best suited. A full list of departments is published on
> the "Contact Us" page of the Star's website:
> https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html
> How to reach a Star journalist: Most staff members, including
> reporters, editors, columnists and photographers, can be reached by
> email. In most cases the email address follows this formula (all lower
> case, don't type spaces or the plus sign): first initial + last name
> @thestar.ca. You can also reach staff in the Editorial department
> (newsroom) via phone at 416-869-4300 or fax at 416-869-4328. Editorial
> staff members can also be contacted within the department they work
> for. To reach a freelance writer, please contact the section in which
> his or her article appeared.
> Subscriptions/Customer Service: The public editor's office handles
> concerns about editorial content only.  For home delivery
> subscriptions, delivery problems, billing inquiries and other customer
> service matters, please email
> circmail@thestar.ca<mailto:circmail@thestar.ca>. You may also go to
> our Subscription page<http://www.thestar.com/about/subscribe.html> for
> home delivery information.
> Further information about how to contact other departments in the Star
> can be found here: https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html
>
> Thank you for reading your Toronto Star.
>
>
>  ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MEDIA-MÉDIAS (VAC/ACC)"<vac.media-medias.acc@canada.ca>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:28:32 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: How Ottawa gave up its entitlements to
> embrace ethics SWAT teams Yea Right I agree now tell me another one Mr
> Egan while allt unethical journalists
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> We have received your request and are working on a response. We will
> send you an answer to your query as soon as possible.
>
> Thank you for your interest in Veterans Affairs Canada.
>
> ***
>
> Bonjour,
>
> Nous avons bien reçu votre demande. Nous allons préparer une réponse à
> vos questions et vous l’envoyer aussitôt que possible.
>
> Nous vous remercions de l’intérêt pour Anciens Combattants Canada.
>
> ***
>
> Media Relations | Relations avec les médias
> Veterans Affairs Canada | Anciens Combattants Canada
> Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
> 613-992-7468
> vac.media-medias.acc@canada.ca
<mailto:vac.media-medias.acc@canada.ca>
> Check out our Media
> Kits<http://www.veterans.gc.ca/eng/news/media-kits>! / Consultez notre
> Trousse d’information<http://www.veterans.gc.ca/fra/news/media-kits>!
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Dale, Daniel"<ddale@thestar.ca>
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 16:28:32 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: How Ottawa gave up its entitlements to
> embrace ethics SWAT teams Yea Right I agree now tell me another one Mr
> Egan while allt unethical journalists
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Daniel Dale is no longer at the Star. If you have a news tip or press
> release, please send them to: city@thestar.ca<mailto:city@thestar.ca>.
> Thank you for contacting the Star.
>
>
>
> https://www.thespec.com/ts/news/canada/2022/06/26/canadas-top-mountie-nova-scotias-mass-shooting-probe-and-some-missing-pages-heres-what-we-know-so-far.html
>
>
> Canada’s top Mountie, Nova Scotia’s mass shooting probe and some
> missing pages: Here’s what we know so far
> RCMP faced more scrutiny for initially removing pages from subpoenaed
> documents recording Lucki’s anger at refusal to release details about
> the guns.
> SM
> By Steve McKinleyHalifax Bureau
> Sun., June 26, 2022
>
> RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki this week faced accusations that she
> sought to interfere with the Nova Scotia Mounties’ investigation into
> the province’s April 2020 massacre.
>
> HALIFAX—As controversy swirls around the RCMP, the Liberal government
> and allegations of interference in the investigation of the worst mass
> shooting in the country’s history, missing RCMP documentation is the
> latest development to take centre stage.
>
> RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki this week faced accusations that she
> sought to interfere with the Nova Scotia Mounties’ investigation into
> the province’s April 2020 massacre, potentially at the behest of
> then-public safety minister Bill Blair and the Prime Minister’s Office
> to grease the wheels for upcoming gun control legislation.
>
> Lucki, Blair and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have denied that there
> was any interference with the Nova Scotia investigation.
>
> On Friday, the RCMP — and the Department of Justice by extension —
> faced scrutiny for initially removing pages from subpoenaed documents
> that recorded Lucki’s anger at the Nova Scotia RCMP’s refusal to
> release details about the guns involved in the shooting. The Nova
> Scotia Mounties had said doing so would compromise their
> investigation.
>
> The missing pages, which described Lucki telling a Nova Scotia
> contingent that she’d promised the public safety minister and the PMO
> the gun details would be released, were only handed over to the
> inquiry in May of this year, three months after the RCMP had provided
> the same documents without those pages.
>
> Here’s what’s happened so far, and what’s likely to happen next.
>
> What’s the controversy exactly?
>
> Days after the mass shooting that saw 22 people killed by a gunman in
> northern Nova Scotia, there was a meeting between national and Nova
> Scotia RCMP.
>
> Notes from that meeting, released this week by the public inquiry now
> reviewing the tragedy, show it included RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki
> and, from the Nova Scotia side, Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman,
> the province’s commanding officer; Supt. Darren Campbell; and
> strategic communications director Lia Scanlan.
> RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell discusses the timeline of events and
> locations of the Nova Scotia shootings at RCMP headquarters in
> Dartmouth, N.S., on April 24, 2020.
>
> In press briefings to that point, N.S. RCMP had withheld specifics on
> the weapons used by the gunman, saying that identifying the specific
> guns would compromise the investigation.
>
> At the meeting, Lucki “was obviously upset” that N.S. RCMP had not
> released the specifics, Campbell’s handwritten notes indicate.
>
> “The commissioner accused us (me) of disrespecting her by not
> following her instructions,” his notes said.
>
> At the time, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government was in the
> process of pushing through an order-in-council that would ban the sale
> of 1,500 models of assault-style firearms.
>
> Campbell’s notes indicate that when he attempted to explain the
> reasoning for not releasing this information, Lucki said that “we (the
> Nova Scotia RCMP) didn’t understand, that this was tied to pending gun
> control legislation that would make officers and public safer by or
> through this legislation.”
>
> “The commissioner said that she had promised the Minister of Public
> Safety and the Prime Minister’s Office that the RCMP (we) would
> release this information,” wrote Campbell.
>
> In an interview with the Mass Casualty Commission in February of this
> year, Scanlan also expressed frustration, saying Blair and Trudeau
> were “weighing in on what we could and could not say” in press
> briefings.
>
> “That is 100 per cent Minister Blair and the Prime Minister,” she
> said. “And we have a commissioner that does not push back.”
>
> Why was that bad, if it happened?
>
> The notes from that conference seem to indicate that Lucki was willing
> to interfere with RCMP operations — the investigation of the mass
> shooting — to advance a gun-control agenda championed by the Prime
> Minister’s Office and by the public safety minister at the time,
> Blair.
>
> Based on Lucki’s comments — as reported by Campbell — it appears that
> she was taking her marching orders from Blair and from the PMO.
>
> If true, that’s problematic because it compromises the principle of
> “operational independence,” a central tenet of policing that dictates
> that politicians should never dictate or direct police operations. In
> principle, it’s a noble concept; in practice, the definition is
> somewhat fuzzy.
>
> Lucki said late Tuesday that she would never take action that would
> jeopardize an investigation. Blair, now the emergency preparedness
> minister, denied that Lucki had ever promised him that the RCMP would
> release specific information about the guns. He’s also denied that he
> told anyone what the RCMP should communicate about their own
> investigation.
>
> Trudeau, speaking from a Commonwealth summit in Rwanda, said Thursday
> there was no “undue influence or pressure” put on the RCMP in the days
> following the mass shooting, and that only police determine what
> information to release and when.
>
> What position does this leave the RCMP commissioner in?
>
> Lucki’s tenure atop the RCMP has not been without controversy.
>
> In 2020, she drew criticism for saying she had struggled over the
> definition of systemic racism and its existence in her police force.
> Shortly thereafter, she changed tack and acknowledged that systemic
> racism was indeed present in the RCMP, drawing the ire of some
> members.
>
> That same year, the B.C. Civil Liberties Association filed a lawsuit
> against her for delaying the release of a civilian watchdog report
> into RCMP spying on Indigenous and climate advocates. And a series of
> on-camera incidents sparking allegations of excessive use of force by
> RCMP officers prompted then-Chief of the Assembly of First Nations
> Perry Bellegarde to call for her replacement.
>
> Trudeau said this week he still has confidence in Lucki to lead the
> RCMP. His support echoed that of current public safety minister, Marco
> Mendicino, and Blair.
>
> What’s the deal with the missing notes?
>
> On June 15, 2021, the Mass Casualty Commission issued a subpoena to
> the RCMP for its entire investigative file related to the mass
> shooting.
>
> Eight months later, on Feb. 14, 2022, as part of that file, the RCMP
> turned over the notes of senior RCMP officers, including Campbell’s
> handwritten notes covering the period from April 19, 2020 to June 16,
> 2020. Campbell’s notes covered 132 pages.
>
> Campbell was in the habit of writing the date in large numbers across
> the page in his notes like this: 2020-04-27.
>
> In those notes turned over by the RCMP in February, his dates jumped
> from 2020-04-27 to 2020-04-29 — April 27, 2020, to April 29, 2020 —
> with no April 28 in between.
>
> April 28, 2020 was the date of the conference with Lucki, during which
> Campbell’s notes reflected Lucki being upset about Campbell not
> releasing specific information on the guns used in the mass shooting,
> and noting her saying that she had promised the public safety minister
> and the PMO that she would do so.
>
> More than three months later, on May 31, 2022, the commission received
> another batch of documents from the Department of Justice, which again
> included Campbell’s handwritten notes.
>
> This time the notes numbered 136 pages and included the four pages of
> Campbell’s notes from the conference with Lucki, dated, as was his
> habit, with 2020-04-28 written across the page.
>
> “The Commission sought an explanation from the Department of Justice
> about why four pages were missing from the original disclosure of
> Supt. Campbell’s notes,” the Mass Casualty Commission’s investigations
> director, Barbara McLean, said in a statement Friday.
>
> “The Commission is also demanding an explanation for any further
> material that has been held back from disclosed material for privilege
> or other review where the fact that this has occurred is not clear on
> what has been produced to the Commission.
>
> “In short, the Commission is seeking assurance that nothing else has
> been held back as per direction from subpoenas.”
>
> The RCMP did not respond to a request from the Star seeking an
> explanation for the missing pages.
>
> What do the victims families’ think?
>
> “Our clients are understandably troubled by what they heard,” Michael
> Scott of Patterson Law, which represents most of the families of the
> victims of the shooting, said in a statement this week. “In the days
> following April 19, 2020, all efforts should have been focused on
> supporting victims, their families and the active investigation being
> carried out by local RCMP.
>
> “Interfering in those efforts, to exploit a perceived political
> opportunity or otherwise, would have been inexcusable. We trust that
> the Mass Casualty Commission recognizes the importance of determining
> the truth of these allegations and the need for fulsome
> cross-examination of the relevant witnesses.”
>
> When will we hear more from the players involved?
>
> Campbell and Lucki are scheduled to appear as witnesses at the Mass
> Casualty Commission inquiry in coming months, as are Assistant
> Commissioner Lee Bergerman, the province’s commanding officer at the
> time, and Chief Supt. Chris Leather, who was the critical incident
> commander the weekend of the shootings.
>
> But a parliamentary public safety committee has also called upon many
> of the same players to testify as it digs into the allegations of
> political interference into the RCMP investigation.
>
> Lucki and Blair are required to appear before the committee no later
> than July 25, and Campbell and Scanlan are being called as well. Also
> tapped for testimony before the committee are Bergerman and Leather.
>
> With files from The Canadian Press
> SM
> Steve McKinley is a Halifax-based reporter for the Star. Follow him on
> Twitter: @smckinley1
>
>
>
>
> https://raymond1212.rssing.com/chan-70058897/all_p19.html
>
>
>
> —–Original Message—–
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:45 AM
> Subject: Remember me Mr Travers? Say Hey to Bev Busson for me will ya?
> All her cops are ducking me.
> Date: Sat, 4 Nov 2006 10:30:08 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: My cell # is 506 434 1379 Stress test my integrity why don't
> ya?
> To: “Travers, Jim” <jtravers@thestar.ca>
>
> What you say is true, that is why I must sue.. We all know why
> your fellow haughty snotty Upper Canadian reporters have ignored the
> Code of Ethics for journalists for years. The freedom of the press is
> a myth. They do what they are told. N'est Pas? However your publicly
> held company is in a world of trouble with me.
>
> If you doubt me ask Marie Beyette your company's
> Vice-President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary to ask the
> following dudes about my issues about Tax Fraud Securities Fraud, Bank
> Fraud and Murder. Rest assured the RCMP ain't gonna tell you shit.
>
> Theses dudes are your directors and I have already proven many times
> that their companies are as crooked as Hell. The Torys oufit was the
> most fun of all just ask Lord Conrad Black and his sneaky lawyer Eddy
> Greenspan about the doings between me and the corrupt Yankee US
> Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald just acrost the 49th from you.
>
> SARABJIT S. MARWAH (He should talk to Deborah Alexander)
> Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer, Bank of Nova Scotia
>
> RONALD W. OSBORNE (he should talk to Robert C. Pozen and Jeffery Carp)
> Chairman, Sun Life Financial Inc.
>
> THE HON. FRANK IACOBUCCI (He should talk to his partner John Laskin)
> Chairman of the Board, Torstar Corporation
> Counsel, Torys LLP
> Former Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> “Travers, Jim” <jtravers@thestar.ca> wrote:
>
> Your integrity is beyond my purview.
>
> ————————–
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
> —–Original Message—–
> From: David Amos
> To: Travers, Jim
> Sent: Sat Nov 04 09:08:59 2006
> Subject: My cell # is 506 434 1379 Stress test my integrity why don't ya?
>
> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 22:51:33 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Fwd: Cya'll in Court Johnny Boy
> To: premier@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
> mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
> Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
> john.foran@gnb.ca, giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca, plee@stu.ca,
> oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
> davies.carl@nbpub.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
> claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca
>
> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 10:57:25 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Cya'l in Court Johnny Boy
> To: john.logan@gnb.ca, christina.winsor@gnb.ca
>
> Your assistant Katherine Wilson really pissed me off after a long wait
> on hold to talk to you on the phone today. I read the news today and
> just shook my head at the nonsense of it all.
>
> Wilson claimed that she was well aware of my matters and that all of
> your associates employed as Crown Attorneys have advised me to the
> best of your abilities. How can that be? I have not been able to speak
> to any of you since I spoke to the crook, Jeff Mockler over two years
> ago and that was immediately after I came screaming out of jail in the
> USA. I saw red as I read his words to me then. They were obviously
> sent when he thought I would never get out of that Yankee jail.
>
> To date I have not received one response in writng let alone speak to
> anyone employed by the Crown as legal counsel, Despite the
> unbelievable volume of material I have faxed emailed and delivered in
> hand and byway of the Canada Post, you all failed to act within the
> scope of your employment and certainly do not deserve a raise. In fact
> you should all go to jail, not pass go and not allowed to accept even
> 200, dollars more from the taxpayers of New Brunswick.
>
> The text of the fowarded email I sent last night to you political bosses
> and many others says enough about my pending lawsuits.
>
> The Governor General of Canada is the highest authority in Canada
> who speaks in the name of the Crown N'est Pas? Well I received that
> letter mere days before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA.
>
> Well you can easily see that she affirms over two years ago that I had
> done the right thing with regards to provincial law enforcement
> authorities just as Deputy Prime Minister Landslide Annie McLellan
> had suggested I do before I came back home to New Brunswick to run
> for a federal seat in the malevolent 38th Parlaiment.
>
> Wheras you refused to talk to me today Johnny Boy Logan, may I
> suggest that you talk to the RCMP or some of your associates
> starting with Jeff Mockler. I have had enough of your obvious malice.
>
> I will leave you to wonder as to who else will read my opinion of you
> and your legal cohorts in short order. Cya'll in Court.
>> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> “Jan 3rd, 2004
>
> Mr. David R. Amos
> 143 Alvin Avenue
> Milton, MA 02186
> U.S.A.
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
>
> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
> predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regardingyour safety.
> I apologize for the delay in responding.
>
> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
> suggest that you contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition,
> any evidence of criminal activity should be brought to their attention
> since the police are in the best position to evaluate the information
> and take action as deemed appropriate.
>
> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> A. Anne McLellan”
>
> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:43:33 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Fwd: BOOO ya Bastards
> To: premier@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca,
> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca,
> mary.schryer@gnb.ca, rick.miles@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
> Bernard.LeBlanc@gnb.ca, Cheryl.Lavoie@gnb.ca,
> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca,
> giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> CC: jonesr@cbc.ca, mleger@stu.ca, jwalker@stu.ca,
> plee@stu.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, belord@gnb.ca,
> DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca, davies.carl@nbpub.com,
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca,
> claude.landry@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca,
> info@pco-bcp.gc.ca
>
> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:41:38 -0800 (PST)
> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
> Subject: BOOO ya Bastards
> To: jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
> Deb_Nobes@cbc.ca, spinks08@hotmail.com,
> Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, ndpnpd@nbnet.nb.ca,
> mackay01@canada.com,PoliticsNB@hotmail.com,
> oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, handsofnothing@yahoo.ca,
> gcox@citizenspress.org, stevengerickson@yahoo.com
> CC: MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca, Day.S@parl.gc.ca,
> Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
> Guimond.M@parl.gc.ca, Cy.LEBLANC@gnb.ca,
> Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, Johnw.BETTS@gnb.ca,
> saintjohnfundy@hotmail.com, len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com,
> william.gould@gnb.ca, cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca,
> news@kingscorecord.com
>
> September 11th, 2004
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson,
> I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD regarding
> corruption, one received from you directly, and the other forwarded
> to us by the Office of the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
>
> I regret to inform you that the Governor General cannot intervene in
> matters that are the responsibility of elected officials and courts of
> Justice of Canada.
>
> You already contacted the various provincial authorities regarding
> your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>
> Yours sincerely.
> Renee Blanchet
> Office of the Secretary to the
> Governor General
>
> Criminal Code PART IV OFFENCES AGAINST THE ADMINISTRATION
> OF LAW AND JUSTICE
>
> Corruption and Disobedience 126. (1) Every one who, without
> lawful excuse, contravenes an Act of Parliament by wilfully doing
> anything that it forbids or by wilfully omitting to do anything that
> it requires to be done is, unless a punishment is expressly provided
> by law, guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for
> a term not exceeding two years.(2) Any proceedings in respect of a
> contravention of or conspiracy to contravene an Act mentioned in
> subsection (1), other than this Act, may be instituted at the instance
> of the Government of Canada and conducted by or on behalf of that
>
> Government.R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 126; R.S., 1985, c. 27 (1st Supp.),
> s. 185(F).
>
> ________________________________
> Crown lawyers receive help in fight for pay raise
> Last Updated: Wednesday, November 1, 2006 | 9:26 AM AT
> CBC News <http://www.cbc.ca/news/credit.html>
>
> Lawyers who work for the New Brunswick government say a previously
> secret report may help their case for a bigger pay raise.
>
> The lawyers had to go to court to see the report, which proves they're
> underpaid, they say. Government lawyers aren't unionized and can't
> strike, so have no leverage in asking the government to raise their pay.
>
> Last year, the government commissioned a study of what Crown
> lawyers make across the country as part of a review of salaries.
>
> The government wouldn't give the Crown Counsel Association a copy
> of the report when it was done, so the association used the Right to
> Information Act to take the government to court, and a judge ordered
> the report released.
>
> Association president John Logan says the report appears to show
> government lawyers here are paid less than their counterparts in
> other provinces.
>
> “The association of Crown counsel are reviewing the report and intend
> to use it as background information.”
>
> The association is hoping to meet with the new attorney general to
> talk about the report, but government spokesperson Christina Winsor
> says a good pay plan is already in place.
>
> “The current pay plan for the lawyers is an average of three per cent
> a year over four years, and that is consistent and slightly above
> inflation rates, which is averaging about two per cent right now.”
>
> Winsor says a new study will be commissioned in 2009 when the
> current schedule of pay increases expires
> ——————————————————————————–
>
> http://www.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf_eng/judges-juges_eng.html
>
> The Honourable John B. Laskin
> Justice John B. Laskin practised litigation for more than 30 years in
> the Toronto office of Torys LLP. In his broad trial and appellate
> practice, he represented individuals, corporations, governments and
> their agencies, public institutions, industry associations, public
> interest groups, and Indigenous organizations. He appeared in the
> Supreme Court of Canada, the Federal Courts, every level of court in
> Ontario, the courts of seven other provinces and territories, domestic
> and international arbitrations, and a variety of administrative
> tribunals.
> Justice Laskin is a Fellow of the American College of Trial Lawyers
> and of Litigation Counsel of America, and has been a member of the
> Ontario Regional Committee of the Supreme Court Advocacy Institute. He
> has spoken, written and taught frequently on matters of public law and
> advocacy, and was co-editor of Canadian Charter of Rights Annotated.
> Before entering private practice, he was a professor in the University
> of Toronto’s Faculty of Law.
> Born in Thunder Bay, Justice Laskin holds a B.A. (with distinction)
> from York University, an LL.B. (as Gold Medallist) from the University
> of Toronto, and an LL.M. from the University of California at
> Berkeley. He is a past President of the University of Toronto Law
> Alumni Association and was actively involved in the founding of the
> Faculty of Law at Lakehead University. In 2015, he was awarded the Law
> Society of Upper Canada’s Law Society Medal, given for outstanding
> service within the legal profession where the service is in accordance
> with the highest ideals of the profession.
> Justice Laskin was appointed a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal on
> June 21, 2017.
>
>
> Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security
>
> of spyware protection.
> Here just a couple of the latest examples
>
> https://globalnews.ca/news/8992242/wife-of-n-s-mass-killer-lisa-banfield-gabriel-wortman-inquiry-shooting/
>
> Wife of N.S. mass killer explains why she didn’t report earlier
> violence to police
> By Michael Tutton and Michael MacDonald The Canadian Press
> Posted July 15, 2022 6:33 am
>
> WATCH: In an emotional, multi-hour testimony, Lisa Banfield confessed
> to hiding information from the police. Callum Smith has the latest.
>
> The common-law wife of the man responsible for the Nova Scotia mass
> shooting told an inquiry Friday that she lied to police about his
> illegal weapons and failed to report earlier violent behaviour because
> she was deeply afraid of him.
>
> Lisa Banfield struggled to maintain her composure as she described how
> her partner beat her in 2003 as witnesses looked on, and she offered
> new details about what happened when her spouse threatened to kill his
> parents in 2010.
>
> It was the first time she has spoken publicly about her life with the
> killer, and the inquiry’s decision to spare her from facing
> cross-examination proved contentious. Lawyers from a firm representing
> families of 14 of the victims, as well as about 20 of those family
> members, walked out of the hearing in protest before it ended.
>  Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at
> the Mass Casualty Commission on Friday.
> Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at
> the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural
> Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022.
> Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police
> cruiser, murdered 22 people. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan.
>
> The inquiry has heard Banfield was beaten and badly injured by Gabriel
> Wortman on the night of April 18, 2020, at the beginning of his
> shooting rampage that would claim 22 lives. She told investigators
> that she escaped into the woods and emerged the next morning to tell
> police that her partner was still at large and driving a vehicle that
> looked exactly like an RCMP cruiser.
>
> Banfield said she will remain forever haunted by her decision to flee,
> as she wonders if her spouse might have harmed her and then left
> others alone.
>
> “I often think would any of those people have died? So that is
> something that haunts me all the time, because I feel that they
> weren’t targeted. He was looking for me in the beginning,” she said.
>
> Banfield’s testimony was at times painful and dramatic as she
> described what happened in June 2010 when Wortman’s uncle alerted
> Halifax police that his nephew had threatened to kill his parents over
> a property dispute.
> Click to play video: 'Spouse of N.S. mass shooter reveals grim details
> about their life'   2:02 Spouse of N.S. mass shooter reveals grim
> details about their life
>
> Banfield recalled how the killer had been drinking heavily and fired a
> bullet into the wall of their home in Dartmouth, N.S., terrifying her.
> When a Halifax police officer arrived at their door, Banfield admitted
> she lied when asked about the death threats and whether her spouse
> owned any weapons.
>
> When commission lawyer Gillian Hnatiw asked why she lied, Banfield
> sobbed as she explained.
>
> “He had the handgun by the nightstand, and he said. ‘If any police
> come, I’m shooting,”’ she said. “So, when they asked me that, I didn’t
> want them to go in, because I didn’t want them
> (police) to get hurt.”
>
> When an RCMP officer showed up at the couple’s summer home in
> Portapique, N.S., after the death threat was reported, Wortman
> insisted he didn’t own any firearms, aside from an old musket and
> another antique weapon suspended near the fireplace and “filled with
> wax,” Banfield testified.
>
> She confirmed that the officer in question was Const. Greg Wiley, who
> had known Wortman for years and later told investigators that he had
> visited his Portapique home 16 times.
>
> Hnatiw also asked Banfield about a violent assault at a gathering in
> Sutherland Lake, north of Portapique. In earlier interviews with the
> inquiry, she indicated the attack took place in 2001 or 2002, but she
> confirmed Friday the actual date was 2003.
>
> She testified that when she tried to leave the bush party, Wortman
> became irate. As the pair drove away in his Jeep, he started punching
> her, she said.
>
> “And as I was driving back on the back road, he’s yelling at me,” she
> said as the hearing room fell silent. “He started smacking me in my
> face. I’m thinking, ‘I’ve never had anybody hit me before … and I’m
> trying to drive. He just kept whacking me in the head.”
>
> She said she jumped out of the vehicle and ran into the woods. He ran
> after her and caught her.
>
> “He grabbed by the hair and was punching me, and I’m trying to protect
> myself,” she said. “I’m screaming. He pulled me out by the road … and
> then I could see these two (all-terrain vehicles) and their lights
> were on me. He looked up and he dropped me.”
>
> Banfield said Wortman was later placed in the back of a police cruiser
> and taken back to their home in Portapique.
>
> Asked why she declined to report the assault to police, Banfield
> replied: “That’s the first time anybody hit me, and I didn’t want to
> get anybody in trouble. I just thought, ‘I’m walking away.”’
> Click to play video: 'Spouse of N.S. killer to testify in inquiry
> investigation'   2:16 Spouse of N.S. killer to testify in inquiry
> investigation
>
> Hnatiw also asked Banfield about the early stages of the couple’s
> relationship, which started in 2001 after they met at a bar in
> downtown Halifax. Banfield said that on their first date, he showed up
> with two dozen long-stemmed roses. “I thought that was over the top,”
> she said.
>
> But later that night, she was impressed by his reaction when his car
> was rear-ended by a vehicle driven by a young woman. “He approached
> the two young girls in the vehicle. He was smiling,” she said. “He
> said, ‘It’s OK.’ He was very calm. I thought, ‘He’s a good guy.”’
>
> Earlier this week, the commission released a document based on
> evidence provided by Banfield during interviews with the RCMP and the
> inquiry detailing the killer’s long history of violence toward her. It
> said she would not face cross-examination, mainly because she could be
> traumatized by having to relive the violence she endured.
>
> Still, lawyer Michael Scott, whose firm represents families of 14 of
> the victims, says the decision to limit questioning will leave
> lingering doubts about Banfield’s testimony.
>
> Nick Beaton, husband of Kristen Beaton, takes a break outside the room
> as Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at
> the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural
> Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022.
> Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police
> cruiser, murdered 22 people., including Kristen Beaton. THE CANADIAN
> PRESS/Andrew VaughanNick Beaton, husband of Kristen Beaton, takes a
> break outside the room as Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of
> Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry
> into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in
> Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer
> and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people., including
> Kristen Beaton. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan.
>
> Michael Scott from the Patterson Law team, representing the majority
> of families of victims, announces that they are leaving the inquiry as
> Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at
> the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural
> Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022.
> Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police
> cruiser, murdered 22 people. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew VaughanMichael
> Scott from the Patterson Law team, representing the majority of
> families of victims, announces that they are leaving the inquiry as
> Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at
> the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into the mass murders in rural
> Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax on Friday, July 15, 2022.
> Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer and driving a replica police
> cruiser, murdered 22 people. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan.
>
> Scott, several other lawyers in his firm and about 20 family members
> the firm represents walked out of the hearing in the afternoon. “We’ve
> decided with our clients we’ve heard enough and we’ll be leaving for
> the rest of the day,” he said.
>
> “I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is lying, I don’t know if she’s telling
> the truth, I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is mistaken, because we don’t
> have an opportunity to ask her any questions.”
>
> In the afternoon testimony, Hnatiw asked Banfield whether she ever
> suspected her spouse might harm others, given she knew he owned a mock
> RCMP cruiser, illegal guns and a stockpile of gas and money.
>
> She replied she regarded it as related to his paranoia about the
> pandemic. “He was talking crazy, and I would pass it off because I
> didn’t want to listen to what he was saying,” she said.
>
> During the 13 hours he was at large, the killer fatally shot 22
> people, including a pregnant woman and a Mountie. He was shot dead by
> two Mounties on the morning of April 19, 2020.
>
> This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 15, 2022.
> © 2022 The Canadian Press
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.therecord.com/ts/news/canada/2022/07/15/portapique-rampage-shooters-wife-to-testify-today-at-public-inquiry.html?li_source=LI&li_medium=therecord_canada
>
> ‘I was so scared’: Tears, anguish — and a walkout — as N.S. mass
> killer’s wife testifies
> The gunman’s abusive and violent behaviour toward Lisa Banfield has
> been documented in previous testimony given to the Mass Casualty
> Commission, but victims’ lawyers have questions, which they won’t be
> allowed to ask her at the inquiry.
> SM
> By Steve McKinley
> Halifax Bureau
> Fri., July 15, 2022
>
>  Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at
> the Mass Casualty Commission on Friday.
>
> HALIFAX —Flanked by her sisters, Lisa Banfield took to the podium
> Friday as the most anticipated witness in the five-month run, thus
> far, of the inquiry into Nova Scotia’s worst mass shooting.
>
> Her mouth set in a tight line, Banfield put her hand on the Bible and
> took an oath, beginning her first public appearance since her
> common-law husband, Gabriel Wortman, killed 22 people and torched
> several houses in a 13-hour rampage over April 18-19, 2020.
>
> Looking visibly distraught, she faced a full room — some 200 people
> crowded into the Nova Scotia Ballroom at the Marriott, who had come
> looking for some kind of insight into killings that shocked the
> country.
>
> In dramatic and emotional fashion, Banfield told the inquiry of her
> abuse at the hands of the gunman, of her fear for her safety and that
> of her family, of his penchant for collecting guns and police
> paraphernalia, and of the events of April 18, when what was supposed
> to be the celebration of their 19th anniversary went horribly wrong.
>
> Before that night was out, she had been assaulted and confined in the
> back of the gunman’s replica RCMP car, from which she managed to
> escape. The killer, meanwhile, roamed the neighbourhood in Portapique,
> killing 13 people there before fleeing into the night. The next
> morning he would begin killing again, before eventually being shot
> dead by police at a gas station.
>
> For families of victims wanting to know why their loved ones were
> killed, there was little solace; Banfield, in her only day of
> testimony, had much guilt, but few answers for them.
>
> “This is what haunts me,” she said, in tears, to the inquiry. “It’s
> because I feel like he was targeting me and my family. And if I didn’t
> get out of that car, I often think, ‘Would any of those people have
> died?’
>
> “That’s something that haunts me all the time, because I feel that
> they weren’t targeted. That he was looking for me in the beginning.”
> Lisa Banfield, the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, is flanked by
> her sisters Janice Banfield, left, and Maureen Banfield, as she
> testifies at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry Friday.
>
> Banfield described her escape into the woods surrounding the gunman’s
> warehouse, eventually crossing to the other side of the road, where
> she heard two men.
>
> “I looked around because my back was sore, so I found a stick and I
> propped myself up and I started walking in the direction where I could
> hear the two guys talking … freaking out,” she said, her voice
> cracking.
>
> “And as I’m getting closer, the stick broke. So, I dropped to my
> knees, and there was another log and I thought, ‘I don’t have it in me
> to crawl over this and try to prop myself up again.
>
> “And then I heard, ‘Hey boys,’ or something. And — ‘bang!’ ‘bang!’ —
> and then there was nothing. And then I just crawled back to the log
> and just hid there.”
>
> She was sure, she said, it had been the sound of the gunman killing
> another of his victims. It’s not clear exactly who that might have
> been.
>
> “I’m thinking, ‘Should I go see if they’re OK?’ But I was so scared,
> and I didn’t want to move,” she said, in tears.
>
> At one point, she wondered if she was hallucinating, she said, because
> she could see the shadow of somebody with a gun that looked like a
> rifle. She wondered if her mind was playing tricks on her.
>
> She hid there by the log until morning, she said, then went to a
> neighbour’s house and called the police.
>
> As Friday’s testimony went on, and the questions kept coming, Banfield
> seemed to become more comfortable, her posture more confident, her
> voice stronger.
>
> But that confidence gave way when she began to relate some of the
> abuse she had faced at the hands of the gunman.
> Lisa Banfield, spouse of Gabriel Wortman, dons a mask at Nova Scotia
> provincial court in Dartmouth, N.S., March 9.
>
> When commission counsel Gillian Hnatiw questioned her about the guns
> that her spouse kept, Banfield said she didn’t think of reporting the
> weapons to police; that she wasn’t afraid that the gunman would use
> the guns on others, but that she was afraid that he would use them on
> her.
>
> “There was a couple of times, where if we had a fight, he’d put the
> gun to my head to scare me and say that he could blow off my head,”
> she said tearfully. “So, I was scared. I said, ‘I swear I’m not going
> to say anything.’”
>
> For all the powerful testimony, there was little new information
> revealed that had not already been gleaned from Banfield’s previous
> interviews with the RCMP, and an additional one with the Mass Casualty
> Commission.
>
> The families of Wortman’s victims left the inquiry en masse in the
> afternoon, frustrated over what they saw as the inquiry’s inability to
> unearth the answers they have been seeking.
>
> “We’ve decided with our clients that we’ve heard enough,” said Michael
> Scott of Patterson Law, which represents most of the victims’
> families, during an afternoon break in the proceedings. “We’ll be
> leaving for the rest of the day.
>
> “Nothing we’ve heard today has allayed any of our concerns about the
> way Ms. Banfield has been handled,” said Scott. “We haven’t heard any
> answers to any of the relevant questions about April 2020.”
>
> Most of that frustration stems from the commission’s decision to limit
> Banfield’s questioning to the commission’s own counsel, rejecting
> requests from the victims’ families to allow their lawyers to
> independently cross-examine her. That decision was made in order to
> avoid further traumatizing Banfield, in line with the inquiry’s
> trauma-informed approach, according to the commission. Police have
> said they don’t believe Banfield was involved in the mass killing.
>
> “Right now, what we have is evidence from Ms. Banfield that is
> entirely untested, some of it’s contradictory, and it leaves us in a
> position where we don’t know any more today than we did yesterday,”
> Scott said.
>
> “I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is lying. I don’t know if Ms. Banfield
> is telling the truth. I don’t know if Ms. Banfield is mistaken,
> because we don’t have an opportunity to ask her any questions.”
> Lawyer Michael Scott, representing the majority of families of
> victims, announces that they are leaving the inquiry as Lisa Banfield,
> the common-law wife of Gabriel Wortman, testifies at the Mass Casualty
> Commission inquiry Friday.
>
> Ryan Farrington, whose mother, Dawn Gulenchyn, and stepfather, Frank
> Gulenchyn, were killed and their house burned that night in April
> 2020, had been hoping for some answers about how and why his parents
> died. He didn’t get them, he said.
>
> “We’re not going to get any answers that we want to know about if our
> lawyers cannot ask (for) them,” he said. “So, yeah, the process, to
> me, is flawed. This entire public inquiry is flawed. I think it’s been
> a big waste of money right from the start.”
>
> A frustrated Scott McLeod, brother of victim Sean McLeod, said he
> found himself no closer to answers than he was two and a half years
> ago.
>
> “Why would he have targeted my brother, who was so far out of the way,
> and start this all over again the second day? What I want to know is,
> what was it that set him off that bad with my brother?” he asked
> earlier in the day.
>
> “She’s not going to give us anything extra,” McLeod said of Banfield.
> “She’s the one witness that should know more than anybody else.
>
> “With the upcoming Mounties (testifying), they’re setting aside two
> days for each of them. So why wouldn’t you set aside two days for Lisa
> Banfield?”
>
> Shortly before she left a significantly emptier room than she had
> entered, Banfield was asked by commission counsel Hnatiw about the
> psychological impact of the past two and a half years.
>
> “The fact that people would think that we would have anything to do
> with this … our family feels for all those people and we’re not angry
> that they’re angry, because, if it was my family, I would feel the
> same way,” said a tearful Banfield.
>
> “But it’s just angering, because he did this, and I didn’t. And I
> would never contribute anything like that.
>
> “It’s really hard because it’s scary to think that people are angry
> and that somebody could come after me or my family if they think that
> we had anything to do with it.”
>
> The Mass Casualty Commission continues its inquiry Monday.
>
>
> Steve McKinley
> Halifax Bureau
> stevemckinley@thestar.ca
> Connect :
> Steve McKinley is a reporter in the Star's Halifax bureau.
> Location :
> Halifax
> Reporting Focus:
> Generalist
>
>
>
https://www.therecord.com/about/aboutus.html#c9
>
>
> About The Waterloo Region Record
>
> Peter Moyer published the first issue of the Berlin Daily News on Feb.
> 9, 1878. Berlin was Kitchener's name until 1916.
>
> It is to the Daily News that today’s Record sets its daily historical
> clock. Moyer anticipated his newspaper would run into "rough handling
> from its very birth." Sometimes he paid his staff in goods shopkeepers
> left behind to cover advertising bills.
>
> German, English, daily, weekly - Berlin readers were swamped by
> newspapers in the late 1800s. For about six months in 1896, Berlin had
> three dailies - the Daily News, the Daily Record and the Daily
> Telegraph.
>
> Ben Uttley, a teacher-turned-newspaperman, created the Berlin
> News-Record by merging his Daily Record with Moyer's Daily News in
> 1897.
>
> There is another important branch to The Record's family tree. John
> Motz and Friedrich Rittinger published the first issue of a German
> weekly, The Berliner Journal, on Dec. 29, 1859. The Journal would
> continue for the next 65 years, outliving almost 20 local and area
> papers.
>
> By 1919, it was owned by W.J. Motz, John Motz's son, and politician
> W.D. Euler. That year, they did an extraordinary thing for proprietors
> of a weekly paper - they bought a daily, Uttley's News Record.
>
> They renamed it the Kitchener Daily Record and published out of 49
> King St. W. The Daily Record took over the Daily Telegraph in 1922.
>
> Some important dates in Record history:
>
> • Jan. 7, 1929 -- the Record moved from 49 King St. W. to a new plant
> at 30 Queen St. N. (the Queen-and-Duke intersection.)
>
> • By coincidence, The Record moved to its current home at 160 King St.
> E. on Friday - Jan. 7 in 2005.
>
> • 1929, 1948, 1962 and 1973 - the years The Record bought new presses.
> In 2000, the newspaper closed the presses at Fairway Road. Printing is
> done on presses in Hamilton, Guelph and Vaughan.
>
> • Dec. 31, 1947 - The Kitchener Daily Record became the
> Kitchener-Waterloo Record to reflect Waterloo becoming a city. In
> 1994, the newspaper recognized its region-wide coverage by dropping
> the cities from its name, becoming simply The Record.
>
> • Jan. 26, 1978 - A huge snowstorm hit southern Ontario and forced The
> Record to miss getting a paper out for the first time in its history.
> Delivery trucks couldn't budge. Some Record staffers bunked down at
> their desks.
>
> • The 1990s - A flurry of ownership changes. Four generations under
> the Motz family came to an end in 1989 when Southam Inc. bought the
> paper for $90 million. Southam sold The Record to Sun Media Corp. in
> 1998. By March 1999, The Record belonged to Torstar Corp.
>
> • Sept. 11, 2001 - The Record published its first extra in 56 years.
> The occasion was the terrorist attacks in New York City.
>
> • June 3, 2002 - Readers woke up to a morning Record - on a Monday.
> The Record was the last Canadian paper of its size to make the switch
> from afternoon to morning publication.
>
> • Aug. 14, 2003 - A blackout swept across southern Ontario. Record
> employees put together a newspaper using laptop computers and a
> smidgen of emergency power.
>
> • Jan. 7, 2005 - Record staff bade farewell to 225 Fairway Rd. S., the
> newspaper's home for 32 years. They moved to King and Scott streets in
> downtown Kitchener
>
> • March 21, 2008 - The Record becomes the Waterloo Region Record, to
> better reflect the entire coverage area of this regional newspaper.
>
> • Torstar was acquired in 2020 by Nordstar Capital, an entity owned by
> Toronto businessmen Jordan Bitove and Paul Rivett.
>
> The Waterloo Region Record welcomes the opportunity to develop
> strategic partnerships that will contribute to the betterment of our
> community and promote public engagement, charitable fundraising and
> social innovation. Our Community Partnerships Program strongly
> supports collaborative initiatives with engaged citizens and
> organizations that strive to enhance the vitality of the Waterloo
> region. We encourage you to browse through our program categories
> listed below and review our philanthropic practices and goals.
>
> The Waterloo Region Record and Lyle S. Hallman Foundation Kids to Camp
> Fund enables children in need of financial assistance to attend a
> variety of day, overnight, recreational and educational camps, by
> partially or fully subsidizing camp costs.
>
> We need your help!
>
> Any individual or organization may make a gift to the Waterloo Region
> Record Kids to Camp Fund. A donation of just $100 can send a child to
> day camp for an entire week!
>
> The Kids to Camp Fund is administered by our local Community
> Foundations. You can designate your gift to either the Kitchener and
> Waterloo Community Foundation’s Kids to Camp Fund or to the Cambridge
> and North Dumfries Community Foundation’s Kids to Camp Fund.
>
> You can make a donation by mail by sending a cheque to: Kids to Camp
> Fund c/o Kitchener Waterloo Community Foundation, 260 King Street West
> - Unit 206 Kitchener, ON N2G 1B6 or Cambridge & North Dumfries
> Community Foundation, 190 Turnbull Ct., Unit 1B, Cambridge, ON  N1T
> 1J1. You can also donate online by visiting
> https://www.kwcf.ca/donate. Tax receipts will be issued for donations
> of $10 or more. Please ensure that cheques are made out to the
> Community Foundation of your choice, or note this in the "Special
> Instructions" box if you are donating online. If this is not noted,
> the funds will be directed to the Community Foundation that services
> your address.
>
> If you are a family wishing to access funds for your child this
> summer, you must contact your camp of choice, who will then apply to
> the fund on behalf of your child. Camps can apply to the fund through
> the foundations websites.
>
> For more information on the fund or learn how you can make a gift to
> the fund please contact Lesley Fitter, Advertising Solutions Manager,
> 519-895-5687.
>
>
> Back to top
>
> The Record Masthead
>
> Neil Oliver
>
> Chief Executive Officer and President, Metroland
>
> Donna Luelo
>
> Publisher, Waterloo Region Record
> V.P. Sales, Torstar Regional Daily Brands
>
> Jim Poling
>
> Editor-in-Chief
>
> David Elliott
>
> Director of Distribution
>
>
> Back to top
>
> Our Journalistic Standards
>
> The Torstar Journalistic Standards Guide provides a comprehensive code
> of journalistic principles and conduct to guide Waterloo Region Record
> journalists in their mission to responsibly engage and connect our
> readers on all platforms with trusted news, information and content.
>
> Here are the general editorial principles that provide the foundation
> for this guide:
>
> RESPONSIBILITY
>
> The Record has responsibilities to its customers, its clients, its
> shareholders and its employees. But the operation of a news
> organization is, above all, a public trust, no less binding because it
> is not formally conferred. Our overriding responsibility is to the
> democratic society.
>
> Freedom of expression and of the press must be defended against
> encroachment from any quarter, public or private. Journalists must
> ensure that the public’s business is conducted in public. They must be
> vigilant against all who would exploit the press for selfish purposes.
>
> Journalists who abuse the power of their professional roles for
> selfish motives or unworthy purposes are faithless to that public
> trust.
>
> ACCESS
>
> The Record is a forum for the interchange of information and opinion.
> It should provide for the expression of disparate and conflicting
> views. It should give expression to the interests of minorities as
> well as majorities, of the powerless as well as the powerful.
>
> ACCURACY AND TRUTH
>
> Good faith with the reader is the foundation of ethical and excellent
> journalism. That good faith rests primarily on the reader’s confidence
> that what we print is correct. Every effort must be made to ensure
> that everything published in the Record is accurate, is presented in
> context, and that all significant sides are presented fairly.
>
> Journalistic integrity demands that significant errors of fact, as
> well as errors of omission, should be corrected promptly and as
> prominently and transparently as warranted.
>
> FAIRNESS
>
> The Record should respect the rights of people involved in the news,
> be transparent and stand accountable to the public for the fairness
> and reliability of everything it publishes. Fair news reports provide
> relevant context, do not omit relevant facts and aim to be honest with
> readers about what we know and what we do not know. Our core fairness
> standard demands that any subject of potentially harmful allegations
> must be given opportunity to respond.
>
> INDEPENDENCE
>
> Independence from those we cover is a key principle of journalistic
> integrity. We avoid conflicts of interest and the appearance of
> conflicts. The Record believes in paying the costs incurred in
> gathering and publishing news. In circumstances where that may not be
> possible, we disclose information that could create the perception of
> a conflict of interest. Transparency with our readers and openness
> about the potential for conflicts should guide our considerations
> about real or perceived conflicts.
>
> IMPARTIALITY
>
> To be impartial does not require a news organization to be
> unquestioning or to refrain from editorial expression. Sound practice,
> however, demands a clear distinction for readers between news and
> opinion. All content that contains explicit opinion or personal
> interpretation should be clearly identified as opinion or analysis, as
> appropriate.
>
> PRIVACY
>
> Every person has a right to privacy. There are inevitable conflicts
> between the right to privacy, the public good and the public's right
> to be informed about the conduct of public affairs. Each case should
> be judged in the light of common sense and humanity.
>
>
> Back to top
>
> Accuracy and Corrections Policy
>
> Here are some of the core policies included in our Standards Guide:
>
> There can be no compromise with accuracy. Accuracy is our most basic
> contract with readers and is the responsibility of everyone in our
> newsrooms. Accuracy is grounded in verification, the essence of
> journalism. We must check and double-check all the information we
> publish, including information from all other publications.
>
> Mistakes will happen. When they do, we correct our errors. Corrections
> serve the reader and they serve the public record. They are essential
> to building and maintaining trust with our readers. Anyone who becomes
> aware of a possible error has responsibility for alerting those
> responsible for corrections in their newsrooms.
>
> Our corrections are guided by the core principles of accountability
> and transparency. We are accountable to our readers for the accuracy
> of the information we publish in stories, headlines, photos, cutlines,
> social media, graphics, data, videos and any other content on all of
> our platforms. We correct errors of fact in a clear, transparent
> manner on the platform(s) in which the error was published, as
> promptly as possible. We make clear to readers the correct information
> and the context and magnitude of the mistake.
>
> On all of our platforms, it should be clear to readers how to report a
> possible error. Readers can do so by emailing
> corrections@therecord.com or, on therecord.com, readers can report
> possible errors directly on an article page by selecting the "Report
> an Error" icon.
>
>
> Back to top
>
> Diversity Policy
>
> Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists.
> Torstar newsrooms aim to reflect the diversity of our communities and
> respect the human rights and equal dignity of all. We aim for a
> variety of voices as sources and contributors in our news and opinion.
>
> We seek to foster greater community understanding about ethnicity,
> race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, socio-economic status
> and physical/mental ability and do not perpetuate hurtful stereotypes.
>
> Generally no reference, direct or indirect, should be made to a
> person’s race, colour or religion unless it is pertinent to the story.
>
> In the case of a missing person or a criminal suspect at large, there
> may be justification for identifying race or colour as part of a full
> description that provides as many details as possible. Avoid vague
> descriptions that serve no purpose. At times, a group may make race a
> public issue. In such cases, the person’s race becomes relevant to the
> news.
>
> Religion is important to the lives of many of our readers. We should
> not hold up one religion or set of beliefs as superior to another. Do
> not single out a religion or religious practice for ridicule or
> stereotyping or use profanities considered offensive to any religions.
>
> We treat men and women equally and respect diverse gender identities,
> including people who identify as neither male nor female.
>
> Torstar is committed to this same inclusivness and diversity
> reflective of our communities in its hiring, promotion, development
> and retention of its staff.
>
>
> Back to top
>
> Anonymity and Confidential Sources
>
> The public interest is best served when news sources are identified by
> their full names. Torstar journalists are aggressive in pressing
> sources to put information on the record and seek independently to
> corroborate off-the-record information.
>
> We do not provide anonymity to those who attack individuals or
> organizations or engage in speculation — the unattributed cheap shot.
> People under attack in our publications have the right to know their
> accusers.
>
> There are times when reporters need confidential sources to serve
> readers and democracy. Responsible journalism in the public interest
> often depends on these confidential sources who give journalists
> information that powerful people seek to keep secret. There are times
> also when some sources, such as underage or other vulnerable people,
> may require anonymity in telling their stories.
>
> Torstar journalists must discuss using confidential sources with their
> department head, and in some cases the newsroom’s most senior editor.
> They must always reveal the source’s identity to editors, and provide
> a compelling argument for why the source will not be named in news
> reports. Senior editors have responsibility to work with reporters to
> assess the credibility of all sources including confidential sources.
>
> Once any promise is made to grant anonymity, we protect our source,
> only revealing their identity with that person’s permission.
>
> Published articles must explain why sources have been granted
> anonymity and why we consider them authoritative and credible.
> Confidential sources should have first-hand knowledge of the
> information and this must be conveyed to the reader. We should publish
> as much information as possible about the source — including why they
> sought confidentiality — without revealing identity.
>
> The definitions and ground rules for not naming a source must be
> discussed with sources. Any further promises made or deals brokered
> with any source must be discussed in advance with senior editors and
> are subject to the following:
>
> • Composites, where several sources are compiled into one person, are
> not used. Pseudonyms are used only rarely, with a senior editor’s
> permission, and must be declared as such in stories.
>
> • The source and the journalist must be clear on what has been agreed
> to and that agreement must be shared with the department manager.
> Torstar journalists keep their promises.
>
>
> Back to top
>
> Conflict of Interest
>
> Independence from those we cover is a key principle of journalistic
> integrity. We avoid conflicts of interest and the appearance of
> conflicts. In circumstances where that may not be possible, we
> disclose information that could create the perception of a conflict of
> interest. Transparency with our readers and openness about the
> potential for conflicts should guide our considerations about real or
> perceived conflicts.
>
> These policies apply to all outside interests that could cause our
> audiences to question the fairness and independence of our journalism.
>
> We seek primarily to ensure that our reporters’ reputations as
> fair-minded fact-finders are not compromised by public displays of
> political or partisan views on public issues, nor influenced by
> personal involvement or personal axe-grinding on issues we cover.
>
> Opinion journalists have greater leeway on these matters, in line with
> the latitude to express their own views in their work.
>
> All Torstar editorial staff should inform their immediate supervisors
> of any outside activity that could result in a conflict of interest,
> or reasonably perceived conflict of interest, that could cause our
> audiences to question the integrity of our work.
>
> These policies are not intended to restrict the personal lives,
> interests or expressions of beliefs of Torstar journalists outside
> their work lives. Rather, as has been established through various
> arbitration processes across the company, they seek to ensure that any
> such personal activities and interests do not come into conflict with
> the public role of our news organizations in any way that could be
> seen to compromise our editorial independence and integrity.
>
>
> Back to top
>
> News and Opinions
>
> The Record clearly labels content on all platforms to draw a clear
> line between news and opinion. This glossary provides definitions for
> various types of news and opinion we publish.
>
> NEWS
>
> News content is verified information based on the impartial reporting
> of facts, either observed by the reporter or reported and verified
> from knowledgeable sources. News reports do not include the opinion of
> the author.
>
> News Terms
>
> Analysis: A critical or contextual examination of an important and
> topical issue based on factual reporting. It provides an explanation
> of the impact or meaning of news events and draws on the authority and
> expertise of the writer. Analysis articles do not contain the author’s
> opinions.
>
> Investigation: In-depth reporting in the public interest that reveals
> wrongdoing and/or systemic problems, holds those in power accountable
> and promotes positive change.
>
> OPINION
>
> Opinion articles based are based on personal interpretation and
> judgment of facts. Opinion journalists have wide latitude to express
> their own views, subject to standards of taste and laws of libel
> including views directly contrary to the editorial views of the
> Record.
>
> Opinion Terms
>
> Editorial: An article that presents a point of view reflecting the
> news organization's position on an issue of public interest.
> Editorials are not meant to be a neutral presentation of the facts.
> They are written by journalists who are expressing the view of the
> news organization. As an editorial serves to present the company’s
> voice, there is no individual byline.
>
> Opinion: Articles based on the author’s interpretations and judgments
> of facts, data and events. Opinion articles include columns written by
> staff and commentary from non-staff contributors. Opinion journalists
> have wide latitude to express their own views including views directly
> contrary to the news organization's editorial views, as long as they
> fall within the boundaries of taste and laws of libel. Columnists
> should not engage in personal axe-grinding or internecine debates with
> other columnists who write for either their own or other publications.
>
> Advice: An advice article reflects the opinion of the author, who
> provides guidance or direction on a topic based on their expertise as
> well as their personal interpretations and judgments of facts.
>
> Blog: An online journal updated regularly by a journalist or editorial
> department that supplements news coverage. Blogs are usually informal
> or conversational in style and may reflect a writer’s opinions,
> subject to the rights and responsibilities of fair comment.
>
> First person: Narratives exploring an author’s insights, observations
> or thoughts based on that individual’s personal experience and
> opinions.
>
> Readers’ letters: A selection of letters by readers expressing a point
> of view, usually concerning a recently published article or current
> event.
>
> Review: A critical assessment of the merits of a subject, such as art,
> film, music, television, food or literature. Reviews are based on the
> writer’s informed/expert opinion.
>
>
> Back to top
>
> Contact Us
>
> The Waterloo Region Record’s mailing address is: PO Box 25069,
> Kitchener, ON N2A 4A5
>
> News, Events and Letters
>
> News tips
>
> Do you have a news tip? Or photos for us to consider for publication?
> Reach out to the news desk via email newsroom@therecord.com or phone
> 519-895-5602
>
> Letters to the Editor
>
> To submit a Letter to the Editor, please email: letters@therecord.com
>
> Frequently asked questions
>
> How do I subscribe to The Record?
>
> Please click HERE to see our Home Delivery and ePaper subscription
> page. Already a subscriber? Click HERE to manage your account.
>
> For TheRecord.com Digital Access, click HERE. Click HERE for
> Frequently Asked Questions about Digital Access. Click HERE to see our
> Subscription Terms and Conditions.
>
> Is my Waterloo Regional Record digital subscription eligible for the
> digital news subscription tax credit?
>
> Yes. Individuals who have a digital subscription to therecord.com or
> the Waterloo Region Record ePaper can claim the digital news
> subscription tax credit on their personal income tax return for the
> years 2020 to 2024. This is a non-refundable tax credit for amounts
> paid by individuals in the year to a qualified Canadian journalism
> organization (QCJO) for an eligible qualifying subscription. Click
> HERE to find out more about this tax credit and how to claim it.
>
> I am a home-delivery subscriber. Is my subscription eligible for the
> digital news subscription tax credit?
>
> Yes. Home delivery subscribers can claim the digital news subscription
> tax credit on their personal income tax return for the years 2020
> through 2024 inclusive. Our home delivery subscriptions include
> digital access to therecord.com and ePaper edition.
>
> The Canada Revenue Agency has indicated that if a subscription
> provides access to content of the qualified Canadian journalism
> organization (QCJO) that is not in digital form (i.e. in print), only
> the cost of a stand-alone subscription to the digital content of the
> QCJO can be claimed. The Waterloo Region Record maximum stand-alone
> digital subscription rate is $7.99 per month. If this maximum
> stand-alone rate exceeds the monthly price of your print subscription,
> see the CRA site for guidance on the amount of the eligible expense
> where there is no comparable stand-alone digital subscription.
>
> To find out more about this tax credit and how to claim it, please
> visit the Government of Canada website. Please visit the CRA website
> for a list of qualifying digital news subscriptions. The Waterloo
> Region Record’s Qualified Canadian Journalism Organization (QCJO)
> designation number is: Q2438091. To view your subscription payments,
> visit our Subscriber Login portal and follow the steps below:
>
> 1. Login with your email and password (Don’t have an account setup? Create
> one.)
>
> 2. Click on PAYMENTS
>
> 3. Click on ACCOUNT ADJUSTMENTS to view your payment history
>
> If you require assistance, please send us an email or call
> 1-800-210-5210 Note: Subscribers are responsible for ensuring that the
> amounts they are reporting are correct. Metroland Media Group Ltd. is
> not responsible for the amount you claim on your taxes
>
> How can I access the E-Paper
>
> Subscribers need to register for an online customer account. Then
> click HERE and log into the epaper with your ID/password and you'll
> have continued access while your subscription is active..
>
> What services are offered?
>
> All visitors to TheRecord.com have unrestricted access to classifieds
> through yourclassifieds.ca/waterlooregion, movie listings, births and
> obituaries through lifenews.ca, celebrations (anniversary, birthday
> and wedding announcements), auction listings, job ads through
> workopolis.com and localwork.ca, Homes Gallery, Wheels, community
> events and directories, and all news stories.
>
> If you are a non-subscriber, call 519-894-3000 or toll-free
> 1-800-210-5210 to subscribe to The Record E-Edition for as little as
> $2.31 per week plus HST (minimum six-month subscription). It may take
> up to 24 hours to set up your account. The E-Paper is available online
> daily by 6:30 a.m.
>
> Can I print articles from the newspaper?
>
> All news articles have a link to a printer-friendly version with fewer
> graphics (to save ink or toner). Click this link, and then print the
> story page using your browser's printer icon or commands. Printed
> articles are for personal use only, and not for distribution.
>
> Can I send articles by email?
>
> Yes. You can send a link of the story via email by copying the URL in
> the address bar and pasting it into the body of an email.
>
> Articles e-mailed between individuals are for personal use only.
> Distribution to a group or subscriber list would be considered a
> violation of copyright.
>
> Can I print advertisements?
>
> You can print advertisements you've found in our E-Edition.
>
> What is the Self-Service Account Manager?
>
> A service currently available to our subscribers. It allows you to
> make changes and inquiries about your subscription. You will be able
> to check your account balance, make payments, make vacation stops and
> contact our circulation department for any other questions or concerns
> you might have. You need to register yourself as a subscriber in order
> to access the "My Subscription" area of our site.
>
> Can I link to a Record.com news story from my website?
>
> You can link stories from TheRecord.com to your website.
>
> Can I republish Record articles on my website?
>
> Requests to republish material (in any format), which has been written
> by Record reporters, should be made in writing to Rod Frketich. Please
> include the article's headline and publication date, the writer's name
> along with an explanation of how the material will be used.
>
> Can I read the classified ads?
>
> Most Record classified ads are hosted on
> yourclassifieds.ca/waterlooregion. Items are displayed by postal code
> making yourclassifieds.ca the perfect solution for buying or selling
> hard to ship items such as cars, furniture, electronics, computers,
> pets, sporting goods, antiques, and much more. For employment ads,
> click here or here.
>
> Can I read the obituaries?
>
> All visitors to TheRecord.com may read obituaries at lifenews.ca.
> Obituaries published since November 2002 may be purchased in the print
> archive. Obituaries published prior to November 2002 are not available
> in electronic form; contact your local public or university library
> regarding access to The Record on microfilm.
>
> Can I search for display advertisements?
>
> Keyword searching of display advertisements is not available.
>
> Can I search for display advertisements?
>
> Complete editions of The Record, including display advertisements, are
> available in our E-Edition. You can view the page, just as it was
> published in the print edition.
>
> Flyers and inserts that are not part of the regular newspaper are not
> available online, but most can be viewed on save.ca.
>
> Can I print items from the e-edition, like the crossword puzzle,
> Sudoku or advertisements?
>
> Yes. Once you are logged into the e-edition, click on the printer icon
> on the top of the page (icons are in red circles). Select the page(s)
> you want to print. Choose either portrait or landscape. Click on the
> box beside "High resolution Prints." Click on print. You can use your
> own printer settings to adjust the size, paper and other print
> functions.
>
> How do I get a PDF of a page?
>
> PDF stands for portable document format, a technology developed by
> Adobe. The biggest advantage to using PDF is that it preserves the
> original look of the document almost exactly -- photos, fonts,
> graphics and layout all appear as they do in the original. PDFs are
> not available on TheRecord.com, which uses an e-edition format. To get
> a PDF, contact 519-894-2250 ext. 772562.
>
> What if I have a problem with delivery of my newspaper?
>
> Missed or damaged newspaper? We want to make it right. Report delivery
> concerns using the self-service account manager, or call 519-894-3000
> to speak to a Record circulation representative.
>
> What if I have trouble logging in or setting up my web account?
>
> Contact us by e-mail at circulation-self-serve@therecord.com, or call
> 894-3000 to speak to a Record circulation representative.
>
> How can I find my password?
>
> Forgot your password? Simply send us your e-mail address using this
> form, and we'll send you your password.
>
> How do I submit a letter to the editor?
>
> We welcome letters that are topical and include full name, address and
> phone number for verification. All letters are edited for clarity,
> style, and length. Letters delivered by mail or fax require a
> signature.
>
> Letters can also be submitted online here.
>
> To accommodate the letter volume and range, writers generally are
> limited to 200 words and one submission in two months. Short letters
> have more impact.
>
> How do I place a classified ad?
>
> All users have access to our online order forms, which will guide you
> through the process of placing a classified ad.
>
> Before publication a classified ad representative will call you to
> confirm the final price including selected options and taxes.
>
> How do I stop and start home delivery?
>
> Going on vacation, or away for a few days? Use the self-service
> account manager to stop and start delivery, or call 519-894-3000 to
> speak to a Record circulation representative. If you are a subscriber
> that goes on vacation for 21 calendar days (includes Sundays) or less
> than you will continue to be charged your current subscription rate.
> You will have full access to therecord.com and our replica e-edition.
> If you are on vacation longer than 21 calendar days (includes Sundays)
> than you will be credited for the stop.
>
> How can I become a carrier?
>
> For information on how to become a carrier, click HERE.
>
> How do I report a problem with the site?
>
> We welcome your feedback -- comments, suggestions and bug reports.
> Contact Editor-in-Chief Jim Poling here.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:31:54 -0300
> Subject: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of my sister and
> her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied receiving this email
> To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
> megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
> ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
> "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
> <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
> Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
> briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
> David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
> <smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
> <rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Sean.Fraser"
> <Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>,
> "mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, washington field
> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
> <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
> "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
> <barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Moiz.Karimjee"<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>,
> "Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, paulpalango
> <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
> <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
> <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>
>
> However the former Attorney General refused to look on the internet to
> verify what I said was true. So I gave up on his bullshit and told him
> to answer me in writing because I could easily the lawyer got the
> damned email. Lockyer just refused to admit it tis all.
>
> Go Figure Why I brought this up today
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzms5ivv5DE
>
> MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS
> 179 watching now
> Started streaming 2 hours ago
> Little Grey Cells
> 3.42K subscribers
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:33:54 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for your email
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
> confirmation your message has been received.
>
> As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
> correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
> correspondence identified as requiring a response.
>
> If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
> Government of Nova Scotia please visit:
> http://novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CJane.MacDonald%40novascotia.ca%7Ceeca3674da1940841c1b08da0c273c2c%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637835659900957160%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2BUnVWeFXmCZiYsg7%2F6%2Bw55jn3t3WTeGL9l%2BLp%2BNkqNU%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Premier’s Correspondence Team
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: James Lockyer <jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:32:01 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of
> my sister and her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied
> receiving this email
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the Province until July 16. I will respond to your
> email as soon as I return.
>
> If your matter is urgent, please contact Kathy Doyle at
> kdoyle@lzzdefence.ca or Katie Ray at katie@lzzdefence.ca.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lsbnb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:34:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of
> my sister and her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied
> receiving this email
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be absent from the office until August 2, 2022
>
> Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 2 août 2022
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Fraser, Sean - M.P."<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:33:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of
> my sister and her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied
> receiving this email
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your message. This is an automated reply.
> Facebook:
> facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<https://www.facebook.com/SeanFraserMP/photos/a.1628138987467042.1073741829.1627521694195438/2066666113614325/?type=3&theater>
> Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter.com/SeanFraserMP>
> Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www.instagram.com/seanfrasermp/?hl=en>
> www.seanfrasermp.ca<file:///C:
> /Users/Savannah%20DeWolfe/
Downloads/www.seanfrasermp.ca>
> Toll free: 1-844-641-5886
> Please be advised that this account is for matters related to Central
> Nova. If you live outside of Central Nova and your issue pertains to
> immigration, please contact Minister@cic.gc.ca
> I am currently receiving an extremely high number of emails.
> If you are inquiring about Canada’s commitment to welcome vulnerable
> Afghan refugees, you can find more information on Canada’s response to
> the situation in Afghanistan
> here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan.html>.
> The Government of Canada remains firm in its commitment to welcome
> Afghan refugees to Canada, and will be working to increase the number
> of eligible refugees to 40,000. This will be done through 2 programs:
> 1.      A special immigration program for Afghan nationals, and their
> families, who assisted the Government of Canada.
> You don’t need to currently be in Afghanistan or return to Afghanistan
> to be eligible or to have your application processed once you’re able
> to apply.
>  Find out more about this special immigration
> program<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures/immigration-program.html>
> 2.      A special humanitarian program focused on resettling Afghan
> nationals who
> ·   are outside of Afghanistan
> ·   don’t have a durable solution in a third country
> ·   are part of one of the following groups:
> ·  women leaders
> ·  human rights
> advocates<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures.html#human-rights>
> ·  persecuted religious or ethnic minorities
> ·  LGBTI individuals
> ·  journalists and people who helped Canadian journalists
> How to reach us
> Contact us using our web
> form<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/en/>.Please
> don’t send photos or other attachments until we ask you to.
> By phone at +1-613-321-4243
> ·        Available both inside Canada and abroad
> ·        Monday to Friday, 6:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. (ET)
> ·        Saturday and Sunday, 6:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. (ET)
> ·        We’ll accept charges for collect calls or calls with reverse
> charges
> If you or a loved one are a Canadian citizen or PR currently in
> Afghanistan, contact Global Affairs Canada’s 24/7 Emergency Watch and
> Response Centre ASAP by phone (+1-613-996-8885), email
> (sos@international.gc.ca<
mailto:sos@international.gc.ca>) or text
> (+1-613-686-3658).
> If you would like to immigrate to Canada, please click
> here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/come-canada-tool.html>
> to learn more.
> To inquire about the status of an immigration case,click
> here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application/check-status.html>
.
> You can also contact your local Member of Parliament for further
> assistance. If you don’t know who your Member of Parliament is, you
> can find out here, https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
> If you have been the victim of fraud or want to report fraudulent
> activity, please call the Canada Border Services Agency’s fraud
> hotline at 1-888-502-9060.
> For other general questions about Canadian immigration, click
> here<https://www.canada.ca/en/services/immigration-citizenship.html>.
> Thank you.
> /////
> Veuillez noter que je reçois actuellement un nombre extrêmement élevé
> de courriels.
> Si vous vous renseignez sur l'engagement du Canada à accueillir les
> réfugiés afghans vulnérables, vous pouvez trouver plus d'information
> sur la réponse du Canada à la situation en Afghanistan
> ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan.html>.
> Le gouvernement du Canada reste ferme dans son engagement à accueillir
> des réfugiés afghans au Canada, et s'efforcera d'augmenter le nombre
> de réfugiés admissibles à 40 000. Cela se fera par le biais de deux
> programmes :
> Un programme d'immigration spécial pour les ressortissants afghans, et
> leurs familles, qui ont aidé le gouvernement du Canada.
> Vous n'avez pas besoin d'être actuellement en Afghanistan ou d'y
> retourner pour être admissible ou pour que votre demande soit traitée,
> une fois que vous serez en mesure de présenter une demande.
>                Pour en savoir plus sur ce programme d'immigration
> spécial<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales/programme-immigration.html>
> 2.     Un programme humanitaire spécial axé sur la réinstallation des
> ressortissants afghans qui
> ·            se trouvent à l'extérieur de l'Afghanistan
> ·            n’ont pas de solution durable dans un pays tiers
> ·            font partie de l'un des groupes suivants :
> ·            femmes leaders,
> ·            défenseurs des droits de la
> personne<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales.html>,
> ·            minorités religieuses ou ethniques persécutées,
> ·            personnes LGBTI,
> ·            journalistes et personnes ayant aidé des journalistes
> canadiens.
> Comment nous joindre
> Veuillez communiquer avec nous en utilisant notre formulaire
> Web<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/fr/>.
> Veuillez ne pas envoyer de photos ou d'autres pièces jointes jusqu'à
> ce que nous vous le demandions.
> Par téléphone au +1-613-321-4243.
> ·            Disponible au Canada et à l’étranger.
> ·            Du lundi au vendredi, de 6 h 30 à 19 h (HE).
> ·            Samedi et dimanche, de 6 h 30 à 15 h 30 (HE).
> ·            Nous acceptons les frais pour les appels à frais virés ou
> les appels avec inversion des frais.
> Si vous ou un de vos proches êtes un citoyen canadien ou un RP
> actuellement en Afghanistan, communiquez dès que possible avec le
> Centre de veille et d'intervention d'urgence 24/7 d'Affaires mondiales
> Canada par téléphone (+1-613-996-8885), par courriel
> (sos@international.gc.ca) ou par texto (+1-613-686-3658).
> Si vous souhaitez immigrer au Canada, veuillez cliquer
> ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/immigrer-canada.html>
> pour en savoir plus.
> Pour vous renseigner sur l'état d'un dossier d'immigration, cliquez
> ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/demande/verifier-etat.html>.
> Vous pouvez également contacter votre député local pour obtenir une
> assistance supplémentaire. Si vous ne savez pas qui est votre député,
> vous pouvez le découvrir ici, https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr.
> Si vous avez été victime d'une fraude ou si vous voulez signaler une
> activité frauduleuse, veuillez appeler la ligne d'assistance
> téléphonique de l'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada au
> 1-888-502-9060.
> Pour d'autres questions générales sur l'immigration canadienne,
> cliquez ici<canada.ca/immigration>.
> Merci.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:34:58 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: James Lockyer an old law school classmate of
> my sister and her hubby Reid Chedore called me back and denied
> receiving this email
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 17:33:45 +0000
> Subject: Automatic Reply
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>
> Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
> note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
> that your message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>
> En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
> prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
> avec soin.
>
> Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
>
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/248955756750224
>
>
>
> May be an image of 1 person
>
>
> Frank
> January 12, 2021
>   ·
> Save the kids or save the ex-con?
> by Paul Palango
> https://www.frankmagazine.ca/.../save-the-kids-or-save...
> (for subscribers only)
>
> On that terrible night in Portapique, the RCMP faced what on the
> surface, at least, seemed like a no-brainer of a situation: rescue
> four children hiding in a basement after their parents had been
> murdered by Gabriel Wortman, or save a convicted drug trafficker with
> ties to a Mexican drug cartel and his parents. Save the kids or save
> the con. An easy choice, you’d think.
>
> Yet, the RCMP chose to evacuate convicted drug trafficker Peter
> Griffon and his parents, Alan and Joanne Griffon, an hour or so before
> attending to the children. The cavalry showed up at the Griffon house
> at 4 Faris Lane sometime around midnight.
>
> Meanwhile, since 10:01 p.m. on April 18, four terrified children, two
> aged 12 and two aged 10, had been on the line with a 911 operator for
> about two hours, hunkered in the basement of slain school-teacher Lisa
> McCully’s house at 135 Orchard Beach Drive. Some half a kilometre away
> from the Griffon residence, as the crow flies...
>
> ...Tammy Oliver-McCreadie, the sister of Jolene Oliver, recently was
> able to gain access to her brother-in-law Aaron Tuck’s cell phone. To
> her astonishment she found a text from RCMP Constable Wayne (Skipper)
> Bent to Aaron. It was sent at 1:15 p.m. that Sunday. The Oliver family
> had been frantically calling the RCMP throughout that day because they
> couldn’t reach their family members. The RCMP repeatedly told them
> they were checking. But they hadn’t been. Not in person, anyway.
>
> The text to Aaron Tuck read: “This is Cst. Bent with the RCMP. Looking
> for Aaron Tuck to call me ASAP. Important. Thank you.”
>
> The three Tucks couldn’t answer Skipper Bent’s text for obvious reasons.
>
> Their bodies weren’t found until near 6 p.m. that Sunday, while the
> Olivers kept calling the RCMP and being stalled by Bent and the new
> officer in charge Corp. Gerard Rose-Berthiaume.
>
> “I have really no idea why in the %#@& would they text and not walk
> down the road and check them,” Oliver-McCurdie wrote in a message to
> Frank.
>
> “The phones were in the house. Aaron’s was plugged in charging.”
>
> That Saturday night and well into the day on Sunday, the RCMP seemed
> obsessed with keeping regular members away from nine crime scenes on
> the lower half of Portapique Beach Road, even after the threat had
> been neutralized.
>
> Nobody bothered to do a wellness check on the Tucks, for one small
> example, until seven hours after Gabriel Wortman’s rampage was finally
> brought to an end in Enfield..
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/302030761442723
>
>
>
> No photo description available.
> Frank
> April 5, 2021  ·
>
> The RCMP, governments and the media have conflated all the killings
> into a single massacre. This is inaccurate. While Gabriel Wortman is
> the perpetrator in both massacres, the circumstances of each are
> decidedly distinct. By treating what happened as one prolonged
> incident provides both a disservice to the truth and a cover for the
> RCMP and its government and public enablers.
> The first massacre took place on Saturday night April 18, and was
> contained in the community of Portapique Beach. It appears that no
> witness to any of the murders was left alive. Portapique resident
> Andrew MacDonald and his wife, Katie, were shot at by Wortman and
> escaped. MacDonald told the first arriving officer, Constable Stuart
> Beselt, that Wortman was dressed as a police officer and was driving a
> fully marked RCMP vehicle. It is understood that Beselt radioed that
> information to his base. The Mounties say they had five units in place
> by 10:35 p.m. or so, but they held their positions. Officers who
> wanted to go down the road were ordered not to by a corporal who
> threatened them with the loss of their jobs if they did not obey her.
> Thirteen people were killed that night: John Zahl and Joanne Thomas,
> Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn, Greg and Jamie Blair, Lisa McCully, Corrie
> Ellison, Aaron Tuck, Jolene Oliver, Emily Tuck and Peter and Joy Bond.
> Could any of them been saved? Since the Columbine massacre in Colorado
> in 1999, police forces just about everywhere have recognized that the
> first officers on the scene of an active shooter must attack the
> shooter and not wait for specialized tactical officers to arrive on
> scene. The first responsibility of any law enforcement officer in a
> critical situation is preservation of life. Why did the RCMP not
> pursue Wortman when they were told where he was by MacDonald?
>
> The second massacre occurred on the morning of April 19, and was
> spread out over a wide swath of Northern and Central Nova Scotia. A
> key thing to note is that the RCMP sent its officers home from
> Portapique around 6:30 a.m. after it was assumed that Wortman had
> committed suicide. Who made that assumption?
> When daylight arrived, the bodies of Corrie Ellison and Lisa McCully
> were still lying by the road on Orchard Beach Drive. At least five
> bodies — the three Tucks and the two Bonds — wouldn’t be found until
> later that day. The police had no idea where Wortman was. Eventually,
> the police said that he likely spent the night behind a welding shop
> of Ventura Drive in Debert, but we still don’t really know that. It’s
> another assumption.
> That morning, Wortman travelled 50 kilometres to Hunter Road in
> Wentworth, where he killed corrections officers Sean McLeod and Alanna
> Jenkins before setting their house on fire. He killed Good Samaritan
> neighbour, Tom Bagley, who came to check out what was going on. He
> then drove back toward Portapique and killed Lillian Hyslop on Highway
> 4. He eluded the RCMP near Glenholme, tried to gain entry into another
> residence, and then killed VON nurses Kristin Beaton and Heather
> O’Brien on Plains Road in Debert.
> Wortman then headed south, where he shot and wounded Constable Chad
> Morrison and killed Constable Heidi Stevenson at Shubenacadie. At that
> scene he coldly executed Joey Webber, another Good Samaritan. He set
> his fake police car on fire with Webber in the back seat, and escaped
> in Webber’s Ford Escape. He stopped about a kilometre away at fellow
> denturist Gina Goulet’s house, killed her and stole her vehicle.
> In all Wortman drove an estimated 200 kilometres. The RCMP did not set
> up a roadblock in front of him. Why?
>
> One year after Portapique: On shifting timelines, evidence
> destruction, incompetence and unanswered questions, by Paul Palango
> https://www.frankmagazine.ca/.../one-year-after-portapique
> (for subscribers only)
> See less
>
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/312155487096917
>
>
>
> No photo description available.
>
>
> Frank
> April 20, 2021
>   ·
> A hearty Frankland congratulations to Darryl MacDonald, Commander of
> the RCMP PEI Operational Communication Centre, named by the RCMP last
> week as the force's OCC Commander of the Year.
> The Mounties hand out the awards every year in mid-April.
> Fortuitous timing indeed for last year's winner, Glen Byrne!
>
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/316306080015191
>
>
>
> May be an image of one or more people and text
>
>
> Frank
> April 26, 2021
>   ·
> Remember last April when the RCMP held four decidedly weird press
> conferences during which Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman, Chief
> Superintendent Chris Leather and Superintendent Darren Campbell all
> embarrassed themselves? Caught lurking behind the scenes at Campbell’s
> press conference on April 28 was an RCMP civilian employee named Alex
> Vass.
> He is a former journalist who had spent almost 30 years working as a
> radio and television reporter in New Brunswick, the last 16 of them
> with the CTV network. In April 2005, Vass went to work for the
> Mounties in their strategic communications department. By 2020, he was
> a senior crisis and communications strategist in the force, “using
> traditional and social media to meet business goals or in other words
> using communications to solve and prevent crime,” as he so awkwardly
> states in his own LinkedIn profile.
> Vass brought added value to the RCMP mainly because he had a pipeline
> back to his former comrades in the CTV newsroom, where he could deftly
> wield influence from behind the scenes and keep the CTV newsroom tame
> when it came to stories potentially harmful to the RCMP’s reputation.
> There was another part of Vass’s back story that shed light on why the
> RCMP had put so much of its faith in Twitter and Facebook and why it
> continued to defend that mystifying decision. Leather memorably called
> the platform “a superior way to communicate this ongoing threat” and
> said he was “satisfied with the messaging.”
> Vass was the key person inside the RCMP who was instrumental in
> convincing the force to use social media in a crisis and who was
> working behind the scenes to manage the force’s response to the
> growing criticism of the practise...
>
> HOW THE MOUNTIES GOT ADDICTED TO TWITTER, by Paul Palango
> https://www.frankmagazine.ca/.../how-the-mounties-got...
> (for subscribers only)
> See less
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/319290883050044
>
>
>
> May be an image of 2 people
>
>
> Frank
> May 1, 2021
>
>   ·
> In which journo Paul Palango breaks in his new Frank hat during a
> recent episode of Nighttime: Canadian Crime, Mysteries, and the Weird
> Sez host Jordan Bonaparte:
> "I've gotta get me one of those. I'll go get my face punched in
> downtown with that hat on".
> "I'd welcome it," declares the noted contrarian with an impish grin.
> Palango's been a regular guest on Nighttime for months, where he talks
> at length about his ongoing investigation into last year's mass
> shootings.
> He's back on the show tomorrow night, May 2, 10:15 N.S. time.
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VkD0oe-aEE
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ngUK7665Fik
>
>
> 12) N.D.A.s - Derpmergency Alert
> 603 views
> Premiered Jan 23, 2022
> Big Fun Garage
> 175 subscribers
> Big Fun Garage Back-Up Channel on Rumble:
> https://rumble.com/c/c-1347083 12) N.D.A.s - Big Fun Garage (Rumble
> Link): https://rumble.com/vt2y06-january-22-...
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xojo_wUfW4o
>
>
>
> MCC Day 48 – Lisa Banfield Speaks
> 628 views
> Jul 15, 2022
> Adam Rodgers
> 651 subscribers
> Today, more than two years after the Nova Scotia mass shooting, the
> common law spouse of the killer has finally spoken in public, as she
> gave evidence in the Mass Casualty Commission proceedings. Lisa
> Banfield spent 19 years with Gabriel Wortman before he went on a
> rampage and killed 22 people over the course of 13 hours on April
> 18-19, 2020. It is difficult to know what to make of Ms. Banfield. She
> has had two years to prepare her answers, considerable preparation
> time and help from her high-profile lawyer, and the benefit of knowing
> everyone else’s versions of events before having to give evidence. On
> the other hand, multiple other witnesses have confirmed her accounts
> of having been the victim of domestic violence over an extended period
> of time. On yet another hand, she had no children to protect, and
> seemed to be enjoying a comfortable lifestyle built on criminal
> activity of which she must have been well aware, and now has a clear
> financial interest in denying knowledge of those criminal activities
> as she tries to retain entitlement to Gabriel Wortman’s estate.
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzms5ivv5DE
>
>
>
> MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS
> 2,695 views
> Streamed live
>
> Little Grey Cells
> 3.42K subscribers
>
> 15  Comments
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Methinks at 4 hours 1 minute you dudes jerked the wrong old dog's
> chain again N'esy Pas?
>
>  "David Amos​Methinks Agent Margaritaville loves to play the wicked
> game N'esy Pas?"
>
> "SadMafioso​ @David Amos Je Nas Comprend Pas".
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Need I say that I am editing my blog???
>
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Say Hey to your old pal Palango for me will ya?
> 1
>
> Paul Kimber
> Paul Kimber
> Greetings brother. This is my second look at this today and it is the
> most riveting thing I have ever seen, because these issues are taking
> place in my household, today, right now. Why do abused women risk so
> many lives before they finally spill the beans? My daughters abuser, a
> career criminal with no regard for others whatsoever knows full well
> he will never be held accountable for his crimes. She is right. These
> women also know that co-operating with the police will not protect
> them for long and if the woman has a child they live in terror. The
> similarities in LB's testimony to our current situation where our
> threat has been alleviated by a 14 day psyche test [3rd one in 2
> years]. I now protect my family with a slingshot. It seems the
> families have no standing in the courts, even with mountains of
> evidence of violent crime, even gun crimes, reckless endangerment,
> etc... over and over again. The man terrorizing our and his family
> openly and inflicting harm on the whole community, has all of us
> concerned they will just let him go AGAIN! GW should have gotten pen
> time the first time he beat her up whether Lisa liked it or not. I've
> watched these courts of revolving door zoom justice for two years now.
> In our case the police risked there lives to protect us, [Almaguin
> OPP] several times. The RCMP are globalist jack-boots and that's
> obvious. The OPP are never surprised to have to respond to assaults on
> our home though, because the courts and politicians are letting them
> all loose now. This proceeding, sadly is as corrupt as the zoom
> fiascoes in our criminal courts. There is no justice in the land, but
> for Divine justice which is shortly to come for those who love the
> truth according to His purposes. This wicked world is about to receive
> its just reward as we enter a thousand years of peace with the Prince
> of Peace, the Lord Jesus Christ and we who love HIM. Praying for the
> folks in that courtroom, who are ever in my thoughts and prayers these
> days. God have mercy and heal your people. Maranatha.
>
>
>
> Joanne Willoughby
> Joanne Willoughby
> I wish I could see the “live chat”, I was interested to see what
> everyone thought of this today!
>
> David Amos
> David Amos
> Go to my blog     DELETED
>
> Little Grey Cells
> Little Grey Cells
> Live chat is there now, Joanne.
>
> Joanne Willoughby
> Joanne Willoughby
>  @Little Grey Cells  😊 Also I truly Thank You for the shirts, that
> was very kind of You. When standing in line at Tim’s waiting for
> coffee yesterday on My way home, I was asked about My shirt. I had a
> nice chat with a young woman and gave her the name of your channel and
> told her to check it out IF she would like to have her eyes VERY WIDE
> OPEN! I hope she looks into it, the more people who get behind the
> truth the better. Take Care and Thank You for everything that You do
> ❤️ God Bless the 23 🙏🏻 and their families 💕
>
>
>
> Nosy Scotian
> Nosy Scotian
> Shawn Banfield learned to barber in the clink. Owned G spot. Cuts in
> the front. Powders in the back. Nephew or cousin not sure to Lisa
> 1
>
> Moshpit70
> Moshpit70
> Damn Dude, The YT blocked your replay chat comments. I learned so much
> from your followers. Glad you're still working towards truth. Thanks
> Seamus, Chat.
> 1
>
> Maureen Weeres
> Maureen Weeres
> LB scared of Gabes threats with guns but not concerned about where he
> stored them!
>
>
>
> Tony K
> Tony K
> I have been watching most days...they swear/affirm them at beginning
> and at times Commissioner MacDonald would sometimes say to a witness
> you are still under oath when they return from lunch or long
> breaks....but not done consistently. I have never seen them swear them
> in again after breaks...unless next day continuation. Is all the other
> 50 days of testimony now invalid? Need one of the 30-50 lawyers
> present to intervene or are they considered still under oath?
> 1
>
> Doreen Stokdijk
> Doreen Stokdijk
> Notice how she says Gabrial in a nice way and then says sorry, G. Hmm
> 2
>
> Scott Clark
> Scott Clark
> how do they all keep the RBF for so long
>
>
> tinycha0s
> tinycha0s
> Has anyone seen the article about that dentist who got that contract
> with the prison systems? wonder if that’s got anything to do with
> this….?
>
>
>
> Lynn M
> Lynn M
> Was she whispering something to her sister around the 59:00 min mark?
> Anyone hear it ?
>
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/partner-of-n-s-gunman-set-to-testify-at-mass-shooting-inquiry-1.6520854
>
>
> Partner of N.S. mass shooter tells inquiry why she didn't report illegal
> guns
> Lawyers of victims’ families concerned about lack of ability to ask
> questions
>
> Haley Ryan · CBC News · Posted: Jul 15, 2022 5:00 AM AT
>
>
> Lisa Banfield, the partner of the gunman who carried out the Nova
> Scotia mass shooting of April 2020, speaks at the inquiry into the
> shooting on July 15, 2022. (CBC)
>
> The partner of the gunman who killed 22 people in the Nova Scotia mass
> shooting says she knew he didn't have a gun licence, but was scared he
> would kill her if she ever reported him to police.
>
> Lisa Banfield testified Friday before the Mass Casualty Commission
> leading a public inquiry into the rampage on April 18 and 19, 2020,
> when her common-law spouse, Gabriel Wortman, killed neighbours and
> strangers as he drove a mock RCMP cruiser.
>
>     CBC's full coverage of the inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass casualty
>
> Banfield, who was only questioned by commission counsel, was composed
> for the first few hours of the day as she testified with two of her
> sisters by her side.
>
> She became emotional when talking about the various firearms the
> gunman owned. Banfield said she never considered reporting her
> common-law spouse to the police, even though she knew he didn't have a
> licence.
>
> "If we had a fight, he put the gun to my head to scare me and said he
> could blow off my head," Banfield said through tears.
>
> "So I was scared. I'm not going to say anything."
>
> Banfield said she was aware other men also knew Wortman had these guns
> and were afraid to say anything, "so what am I gonna do?"
> Wanted to protect police from gunman
>
> She was also asked about what happened when two Halifax Regional
> Police officers arrived at the Dartmouth home she shared with the
> gunman in June 2010, investigating reports that he had threatened to
> kill his parents.
>
> At the time, Banfield told officers there were no guns in the house.
> She testified Friday that wasn't true, but she said she lied to
> protect the officers.
>
> "[Wortman] had the handgun by the nightstand and said if any police
> come, 'I'm shooting,'" Banfield said.
>
> Soon after this, Banfield said RCMP Const. Greg Wiley came by the
> Portapique cottage to see whether Wortman had any firearms.
> Wiley in house for 10 minutes: Banfield
>
> The inquiry has heard that Wiley visited the gunman's cottage more
> than a dozen times in the years before the mass shooting, since the
> officer went to him for tips on local crime.
>
> During that 2010 visit, Banfield said Wiley asked Wortman if he had
> any guns. The gunman showed the Mountie an old musket and one
> decorative gun above a fireplace that was filled with wax.
>
> Wiley was only in the cottage for about 10 minutes and didn't seem to
> take an official statement from the gunman, nor did he search the
> home, said Banfield.
>
> She couldn't remember if Wiley visited the gunman's warehouse or if it
> had been built by then.
>
> The Portapique, N.S. log cottage belonging to the Nova Scotia mass
> shooter. The building, and nearby warehouse, were burned to the ground
> during the April 2020 rampage. (Mass Casualty Commission)
>
> The gunman began his rampage on April 18, 2020, after attacking
> Banfield during a celebration of their 19th anniversary. The gunman's
> long history of violence, emotional abuse and other controlling
> behaviour toward Banfield was outlined in a foundational document
> released earlier this week.
>
> Although Banfield's lawyer James Lockyer said she was apprehensive
> about testifying, due to revisiting of the trauma from her past, she
> chose to give her evidence in person rather than via video.
>
> "She's showing, you know, a lot of courage there in my view, and she's
> going to do her best," Lockyer said Thursday.
>
> As of Friday, Banfield has completed four interviews with police since
> the massacre, a video walk-through of her experience on April 18 and
> 19 in Portapique, N.S., and five recent interviews with the commission
> itself.
>
> Soon after the video walk-through in October 2020, the RCMP charged
> Banfield with supplying ammunition to the gunman and she stopped
> cooperating with police. Banfield also, under her lawyer's advice,
> initially refused to speak at the inquiry. That stance changed when
> her charge was referred to restorative justice in March.
>
>     Spouse of Portapique gunman to have criminal charge resolved
>
>     Common-law spouse among 3 charged with giving N.S. shooter ammunition
>
> According to a commission release, the decision to not allow questions
> from other participant lawyers is based on the volume of information
> Banfield has already provided, and her position as a "survivor of the
> perpetrator's violence."
>
> Gillian Hnatiw, commission counsel, said earlier this week that while
> there may be "follow-up questions" put to Banfield on Friday about the
> shootings, their team will not be asking her to retell that story.
>
> Michael Scott of Patterson Law, the firm representing the families of
> most victims, said they were "shocked" to hear that.
>
> Scott said their clients already had significant concerns with the
> commission blocking direct cross-examination. He is not planning to
> submit any written questions for the commission to consider.
>
> Scott said there is "absolutely no point" in having Banfield give
> sworn testimony in person under the conditions the commission has laid
> out.
>
> Michael Scott is a lawyer with Patterson Law, whose firm represents
> more than a dozen families of Portapique victims. (CBC)
>
> "We can be forgiven for concluding that Ms. Banfield has been called
> forward for no other reason than ... it can be said that she was
> called," Scott said Thursday.
>
> He added that the commission's trauma-informed mandate would have been
> better served by having Banfield testify once in person, and not sit
> through multiple lengthy interviews behind closed doors.
>
> If this process had been done the "proper way" and questions allowed
> from various lawyers, Scott said Banfield would have been allowed the
> opportunity to speak her piece. But as it stands, Scott said there
> will still be major questions around Banfield after she testifies
> Friday, and "speculation about what actually happened."
>
> When asked what else the commission is hoping to learn from Banfield,
> one of their lawyers Emily Hill told reporters Thursday that there are
> multiple issues, including the history of the gunman's abuse in their
> relationship. Hill also said they do have questions for her as a
> witness to how the events of April 18 unfolded.
>
> Banfield has told police how the gunman assaulted her before throwing
> her into the mock RCMP car in his Portapique garage. She said she
> escaped through an opening in the car's divider, and hid in the woods
> overnight.
>
> Lockyer said he's glad that the commission will not allow questions
> from participant lawyers which may be driven by a "conspiracy theory"
> that Banfield actually didn't spend the night outside in the woods.
>
> James Lockyer is a lawyer for Lisa Banfield, the partner of the mass
> shooter who killed 22 people in April 2020 across Nova Scotia. (CBC)
>
> This type of question "takes us to south of the border," Lockyer said
> Thursday.
>
> "You know, these shootings happen south of the border and the next
> thing we hear from the Alex Joneses of this world is that the shooting
> never actually happened, it's completely phony and was made up,"
> Lockyer said.
>
> "We don't need that kind of nonsense in Canada or in Nova Scotia."
>
> Lockyer said Banfield is aware victims' families will be in the room
> Friday, and that's one of the reasons she wants to come in person.
> Banfield never knew the massacre was coming, Lockyer said, and every
> day thinks about what would have happened if she hadn't fled on April
> 18.
>
> "She's going to think about that every day for the rest of her life.
> That's a difficult thing to carry, a very heavy burden to carry,"
> Lockyer said.
>
> "She just hopes that … she's going to be to tell them, as best she
> can, that she just wishes it never happened."
>
> Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left:
> Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean
> McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey
> Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row
> from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond,
> Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie
> Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)
>
> Although Patterson Law filed a motion asking for detailed reasons on
> the commission's approach, the commission released a decision
> dismissing this motion Thursday.
>
> The commissioners said they have explained fully why Banfield is only
> being questioned by their own counsel, who are tasked to find answers
> in the public interest, and "not in the adversarial, trial-like model"
> on which the motion was based.
>
> The commission also dismissed Patterson's request to give an oral
> submission about Banfield's testimony Friday.
>
> This is not the first time the issue of lack of direct questioning has
> been raised by victims' families and their lawyers. In May, the
> commissioners decided that only their lawyers would question RCMP
> Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill and Sgt. Andy O'Brien in pre-taped interviews.
> Rehill was in charge of the police response during the first hours
> after 911 calls began to come in. O'Brien helped communicate with
> officers at the crime scene early in the crisis.
>
> This drew a temporary boycott of the inquiry by many victims'
> families, who did not show up during the Mounties' testimonies and
> instructed their lawyers to do the same.
> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
> Haley Ryan
>
> Reporter
>
> Haley Ryan is a reporter based in Halifax. Got a story idea? Send an
> email to haley.ryan@cbc.ca, or reach out on Twitter @hkryan17.
>
> With files from Catharine Tunney
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|
>
>
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/lisa-banfield-mass-shooting-portapique-video-reenactment-1.6519111
>
>
> Spouse of N.S. mass shooter shows how deadly rampage began in video
> re-enactment
> Lisa Banfield told police what she could remember about Portapique
> events months later
>
> Haley Ryan · CBC News · Posted: Jul 13, 2022 3:57 PM AT
>
>
> The gunman's partner Lisa Banfield, left, stands with a Nova Scotia
> RCMP investigator near the remains of the gunman's warehouse in
> Portapique, N.S., in October 2020, during a re-enactment of the events
> that took place months earlier on April 18, 2020. (Mass Casualty
> Commission)
>
> Warning: This story contains details of violence and domestic abuse
> that are disturbing.
>
> New videos show the long-time partner of the Nova Scotia mass shooter
> re-enacting what she saw and experienced the night the rampage began
> two years ago.
>
> The Mass Casualty Commission released new documents and images
> Wednesday as part of its inquiry into what happened on April 18 and
> 19, 2020, when Gabriel Wortman killed 22 people while driving a mock
> RCMP car.
>
> Among these are video re-enactments from October 2020, when Lisa
> Banfield took an RCMP investigator through what she remembers happened
> in Portapique.
>
> Banfield said the night began with the couple celebrating their 19th
> anniversary and having drinks at the gunman's large garage next to his
> cottage. They were video chatting with friends in the United States
> and talking about how they planned to hold a commitment ceremony the
> next year. That's when their friend Angel Patterson said, "Don't do
> it." That upset Banfield and she left the garage.
>
>     CBC's full coverage of the inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass casualty
>
> Halfway up the path to the cottage, Banfield said she decided to turn
> around and apologize to Wortman, but when she arrived he was already
> "irate." She told the commission she couldn't calm him down, and went
> back to the cottage and into bed.
>
> What seemed like minutes later, Banfield said the gunman pulled the
> covers off the bed and assaulted her, kicking her into the bedpost. He
> then pulled her through the cottage which she noticed was already
> doused in gasoline, and set the building on fire once they got
> outside.
>
> She then told police about the gunman leading her through the woods to
> the garage.
> N.S. gunman’s eyes were ‘just so cold,’ says former common-law spouse
> 21 hours ago
> Duration 0:54
> New videos show Lisa Banfield, the long-time partner of the Nova
> Scotia mass shooter re-enacting what she saw and experienced the night
> the rampage began two years ago.
>
> Once at the garage, the gunman started dousing the vehicles outside
> with gas. He dragged Banfield into the garage, and handcuffed her left
> hand.
>
> But when he demanded her right hand, Banfield said she held it back.
> N.S. gunman’s ex describes what she thought would be her last moments
> before being shot
> 21 hours ago
> Duration 1:16
> Lisa Banfield remembers the tense moments she pleaded for her life.
>
> When she was in the back seat of the mock RCMP cruiser behind the
> plexiglass partition, Banfield said the gunman loaded several firearms
> into the front of the vehicle.
>
> He then went up to the loft apartment in the garage, and she tried to
> kick out the back seat windows with no success.
>
> She managed to slip the handcuff off her left hand and was able to
> slide open a window in the divider and dive into the front seat. She
> ran from the garage, not taking any of the guns in the cruiser —
> something she told police she has replayed over in her head.
> N.S. gunman’s former common-law partner laments over being paralyzed by
> fear
> 21 hours ago
> Duration 0:24
> Lisa Banfield reenacts what she saw and experienced the night the
> rampage began two years ago.
>
> After running from the garage, Banfield tried to hide in one of his
> trucks but was worried he would set it on fire, and fled into the
> woods.
>
> Banfield told police how she spent the next few hours alone, hearing
> gunshots and terrified the gunman would find her.
> Lisa Banfield describes the sounds she could hear coming from beyond
> the woods she hid in
> 21 hours ago
> Duration 3:29
> The former common-law partner of the Nova Scotia mass shooter
> describes in her own words what she could hear while hiding in the
> dark woods in Portapique, N.S.
>
> While Banfield was in hiding, the gunman killed 13 people within the
> small community.
>
> She remained hidden inside a fallen tree overnight as temperatures
> dipped close to zero degrees, inquiry documents said.
>
> Banfield said she thought if she could survive until dawn, she could
> then venture out for help.
> ‘Lisa, just do it.’ How the N.S. gunman’s ex eventually found help
> 21 hours ago
> Duration 1:22
> Terrified and in pain, Lisa Banfield describes how and when she
> emerged from her hiding place in the Portapique, N.S., woods
>
> After first light, she walked to a neighbour who called police just
> before 6:30 a.m. on April 19. Members of the RCMP's emergency response
> team picked her up in an armoured vehicle a few minutes later.
>
> Medical records released through the inquiry show Banfield spent five
> nights in hospital after suffering a fractured rib and vertebrae, as
> well as extensive bruising and scrapes from the night of April 18.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/inquiry-learns-details-of-years-of-abuse-control-suffered-by-spouse-of-n-s-mass-shooter-1.6518865
>
> Inquiry learns details of abuse, control suffered by spouse of N.S. mass
> shooter
> Lisa Banfield says she was convinced the gunman would kill her family
> if she left him
>
> Haley Ryan · CBC News · Posted: Jul 13, 2022 11:16 AM AT
>
>
>
> Inquiry hears from spouse of N.S. mass shooter about years of abuse,
> control
> 1 day ago
> Duration 2:17
> The public inquiry into the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting released
> dramatic, previously unseen video and testimony from the gunman's
> spouse Wednesday. She described suffering years of abuse at the
> gunman's hand, including on the night he killed 22 people.
>
> Warning: details are disturbing.
>
> The first time Lisa Banfield says she was physically abused by her
> partner was a terrifying assault where she ran into the woods in the
> early 2000s.
>
> "He was running after me and I was screaming my head off, and then he
> caught me and then he … you know, I had blood all over me and he was
> dragging me back," Banfield recalled to police.
>
> It's a scene she said played out again years later, the night her
> common-law spouse Gabriel Wortman began a shooting rampage in
> Portapique, N.S., that would leave 22 Nova Scotians dead.
>
>     Mass shooting inquiry to examine gunman's family violence,
> domestic abuse this week
>
>     How the N.S. mass shooter controlled, exploited women around him
>
> The gunman's violence, emotional abuse and other controlling behaviour
> toward Banfield throughout their 19-year relationship are outlined in
> a new foundational document released Wednesday by the Mass Casualty
> Commission. The document is based on interviews with Banfield, her
> family and other witnesses.
>
> The commission is leading the inquiry into the mass shootings on April
> 18 and 19, 2020, examining the tragedy and the factors that led up to
> it, including the violence in Wortman's family and his history of
> harassment and attacks on others.
>
> Banfield, who is set to testify before the inquiry for the first time
> Friday, gave four police interviews following the massacre and five
> interviews with the commission itself in recent months.
> Physical abuse began after party
>
> The documents show that Banfield met Wortman in May 2001 at the
> now-defunct Halifax pub, the Thirsty Duck.
>
> On their first date, he showed up with a dozen long-stemmed roses.
> Banfield felt that was "too showy," and said she wasn't impressed. But
> later in the evening, she was impressed by the gunman's calm demeanour
> when his car was rear-ended.
>
> Things moved quickly after that. Three months later, Banfield had
> moved in with the gunman.
>
> Initially, she described Wortman as "sweet and caring." That was
> before the first time she was physically abused, following a party at
> a cottage in Sutherland Lake, about a half-hour drive north of
> Portapique.
>
> Although witnesses differed on when the incident happened — Banfield
> said it was in 2001, others suggested it was as late as 2007 — the
> commission said it was likely after October 2002 when the gunman
> bought his Portapique cottage.
>
> The burned out remains of Gabriel Wortman's home on Portapique Beach
> Road, N.S., taken May 13, 2020. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)
>
> Banfield said Renée Karsten, a denturist who worked with Wortman at
> his Dartmouth clinic, invited the couple up for the night. But when
> Banfield wanted to leave and offered to take the gunman's Jeep home so
> he could stay, this "set him off."
>
> As she left, the gunman jumped in the car and began hitting her in the
> head as she continued trying to drive. Banfield said she was crying so
> hard she couldn't see, so she stopped and fled into the woods.
>
> The gunman soon caught Banfield and dragged her back to the car, but
> she ran away again when a group of people from the party arrived.
>
> Karsten told police she saw Wortman dragging Banfield by the hair in
> the driveway, so she "lost it" and tried to intervene.
>
> "His face and just the look in his eyes … it scared the hell out of
> me," Karsten told police.
> Police involved, no charges laid
>
> Karsten brought Banfield back to the cottage, and police came and
> drove the gunman back to his Portapique home. Banfield said that was
> the only time police were involved, and nothing came of the incident.
>
> The commission said in the document it's unclear exactly why police
> were called and what they knew about the situation. While police
> records from this time "may have been purged" by now, the commission
> continues to investigate.
>
> When Banfield eventually returned to the Portapique cottage that
> night, she saw the gunman pulling the tires off her car and throwing
> them over a bank. He told her to come inside, but she went to a
> neighbour's and waited for her niece to pick her up.
>
> The niece, Stephanie Goulding, said Banfield was bloody and scraped
> up, with torn clothing. Goulding wanted to stop into the Truro police
> station to report the assault, but Banfield "begged" her not to, so
> instead a sister took photos of her injuries.
>
> Banfield moved back into her sister Maureen Banfield's home after
> this, but Wortman soon began visiting and apologizing, saying he'd
> been drinking and he would never hurt her again — and they got back
> together.
>
>     CBC's full coverage of the inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass casualty
>
> This pattern would continue through the years, both Banfield and two
> of her sisters told police. The few times her family knew of the abuse
> and urged her to report it or leave the relationship, Banfield didn't
> want to take that step.
>
> The gunman would often kick and punch the parts of her body that could
> be covered by clothing, Banfield said, like arms and legs. If he left
> marks on her neck while choking her, Banfield said she would use
> makeup to cover them.
>
> On at least two occasions, Banfield said he put a gun to her head.
>
> "He would say afterwards, 'If I didn't love you, I wouldn't do this
> because that's how much I care about you,'" she told the commission.
>
> One sister, Janice Banfield, called the gunman a "sociopath" and said
> she thought "we're gonna have to bury our sister one day."
>
> But Banfield said she felt she had nowhere to go, because the gunman
> frequently threatened to kill her or her family if she ever left him.
>
> "He would be like, 'I know where your family lives,' and look at me a
> certain way," she said.
> Violence more prevalent than first reported
>
> While Banfield originally told RCMP officers there had been around 10
> incidents of physical abuse over the years, she has since told the
> commission there were actually far more.
>
> "I just don't trust very well, and I was scared to say anything," she
> told the commission this May.
>
> She originally told police years would go by between attacks, and the
> last time had been three years before the mass shooting. Upon
> reflection, Banfield told the commission that was part of her coping
> mechanism.
>
> Banfield would write a journal entry about an incident but never
> revisit it, so she believed an assault hadn't happened in years even
> though it was happening "all along."
>
> "I would just have to block it out because … I needed to deal with
> whatever is going on in that moment, so I couldn't think about what's
> gone on," Banfield said.
> Only one neighbour reported abuse
>
> There were at least two instances of abuse witnessed by other people
> in Portapique.
>
> One day, the gunman's uncle Glynn Wortman and another neighbour saw
> him choking Banfield on the front lawn of their cottage. The uncle
> yelled, "You're just like your father, get off of her," Banfield
> recalled.
>
> Earlier this week, the inquiry heard accounts from several of the
> gunman's uncles describing incidents of his father, Paul Wortman,
> abusing his wife, Evelyn.
>
> One Portapique neighbour, Brenda Forbes, heard about the incident
> Glynn Wortman saw and reported it to the RCMP in 2013. Nothing came of
> her complaint, and Forbes said no one else in the community believed
> her or wanted to get involved.
>
> Banfield said she never told her family doctor about the abuse, and
> was careful to schedule visits only when she had no visible injuries.
> Psychologist urged her to leave
>
> But at one point, Banfield said things were "so bad" she saw a
> psychologist in Bedford who told her she was in an abusive
> relationship. This professional provided support and encouraged her to
> leave, but the gunman found out about it and made her stop.
>
> The gunman also threatened to confront the doctor, Banfield said, and
> she felt "trapped."
>
> Although Banfield said she was always "on eggshells" around the
> gunman, never knowing what would set him off, she consistently forgave
> his behaviour and tried to show him he was loved because "everybody
> always left him."
>
> In a statement to the commission, Banfield wrote she felt bad for the
> gunman when he told her about how his father abused him as a child,
> especially because she had such a large and loving family.
>
> "I thought I could help him if I just loved him unconditionally," Banfield
> said.
> Controlling, isolating behaviour
>
> The range of abuse the gunman inflicted on Banfield fits into the
> definitions of intimate-partner violence and coercive control, which
> are laid out in an inquiry report from Dr. Katreena Scott on
> interventions to address abuse.
>
> Scott writes that intimate-partner violence includes a range of
> behaviours besides physical violence, like unwanted sexual activity,
> threats, humiliation, and economic abuse which deprives a victim of
> the ability to provide for their own needs.
>
> Coercive control is a set of behaviours that disempower someone in a
> relationship, Scott said, like removing their liberties, threats to
> their family, and limiting access to loved ones or transportation.
>
> "Very early on there were so many signs of his controlling or bullying
> behaviour, but somehow, I was able to block it out and justify to
> myself how badly he treated me," Banfield wrote in a statement to the
> commission.
>
> "Gabriel was jealous, controlling, possessive, extremely degrading,
> and piggish; it was 'his way or the highway.'"
>
> Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left:
> Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean
> McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey
> Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row
> from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond,
> Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie
> Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)
>
> Banfield said within the first couple of years, the gunman was able to
> convince her to quit her bank job at RBC so she could come work for
> his denturist business, which would make it easier for them to take
> time off and travel together.
>
> "I realize now that he just wanted to control my entire life,"
> Banfield wrote to the commission.
>
> He urged her to sell the car she'd had throughout her previous
> marriage, and he eventually bought her a Mercedes under his name.
>
> Banfield was in the gunman's will by 2011, but her sister Maureen
> Banfield was worried she'd be left with nothing if they broke up
> because she had no other income or investments of her own.
>
> By 2020, Banfield said she believed she was making around $25 an hour,
> but the clinic didn't have a regular payroll system. Instead, the
> gunman would write her cheques from a business account or give her
> cash, sometimes deducting a percentage from her cheques "for
> retirement," she said.
>
> "He dealt with all the money things, so I trusted whatever," Banfield
> told the commission.
> 'He wanted me to know that without him, I had nothing'
>
> Besides her work at his clinics, Banfield said she would wait on the
> gunman "hand and foot" by making all the meals and handling the
> cleaning and organizing of the household. She told one of her sisters
> it was the way she was raised and she wanted to take on these tasks.
>
> Banfield said in her written statement the gunman controlled
> everything in her life, so when she didn't obey, he could take things
> away to "punish her," including her car keys, phone and salary.
>
> "He wanted me to know that without him, I had nothing. I believed
> that," she wrote. "Made me feel so stupid and incapable of doing
> things on my own even though I did everything for him."
>
> The gunman also often groped Banfield in front of her family because
> he thought "it was funny," she said, and their sexual relationship was
> always defined by his wants and needs, not hers.
>
> Sex between them did not involve intimacy or tenderness, Banfield
> wrote to the commission, and said the gunman was "addicted to
> pornography."
>
> Despite his many affairs, including with Portapique neighbours or his
> own patients, Banfield said she forgave him every time — and "I am so
> ashamed of that."
> Unhappy with Banfield socializing
>
> While Banfield said the gunman would often become mad at her for
> wanting to see her siblings or other family, Banfield said he also
> didn't like her becoming too friendly with people in Portapique.
>
> If he saw her having fun at neighbourhood parties, Banfield said the
> gunman would put her down in front of others for "acting like an
> idiot" and drag her away by the arm. If she refused, he would become
> violent and slap her or pull her hair.
>
> At work, Banfield said he also belittled her and screamed at her in
> front of patients. When out for dinner one night, the gunman threw a
> glass of water in her face and left her alone in the restaurant.
>
> The gunman's controlling behaviour and jealousy appeared to weigh on
> Banfield's mind. One time, Banfield saw another denturist while out
> drinking with her sister, and was terrified they might tell the gunman
> because she wasn't supposed to be out.
>
> When her mother died, her high school boyfriend attended the funeral,
> but Banfield ushered him out, saying the gunman disliked him and would
> be upset he was there.
>
> The violence and control from the gunman lasted until April 18, 2020,
> when he attacked Banfield on the night of their 19th anniversary. He
> threw her in his mock RCMP cruiser, but she said she escaped through
> an opening in the car's partition and hid in the woods overnight.
> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
> Haley Ryan
>
> Reporter
>
> Haley Ryan is a reporter based in Halifax. Got a story idea? Send an
> email to haley.ryan@cbc.ca, or reach out on Twitter @hkryan17.
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/lisa-banfield-video-charge-timeline-1.6520809
>
> Lisa Banfield re-enactment videos raise questions about why she was charged
> Women’s Shelters Canada worries Banfield's experience with police will
> deter other women from reporting abuse
>
> Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Jul 14, 2022 5:04 PM AT
>
>
> The gunman's partner, Lisa Banfield, left, stands with a Nova Scotia
> RCMP investigator near the remains of the gunman's warehouse in
> Portapique, N.S., in October 2020, during a re-enactment of the events
> that took place months earlier on April 18, 2020. (Mass Casualty
> Commission)
>
> The release of new videos showing the longtime partner of the Nova
> Scotia mass shooter re-enacting what she saw and experienced the night
> of the rampage is raising questions about why police charged her in
> the weeks following the shootings.
>
> The Mass Casualty Commission released footage Wednesday of Lisa
> Banfield walking an RCMP investigator through what she remembered
> happening in Portapique, N.S., on April 18 and 19, 2020, including how
> her partner beat her and tried to handcuff her.
>
>     CBC's full coverage of the inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass casualty
>
> The re-enactment was filmed in late October 2020, six months after
> Gabriel Wortman killed 22 people while driving a mock RCMP car.
>
> A few weeks after filming the re-enactment, Banfield was charged with
> supplying ammunition to the gunman.
>
> The Crown eventually determined there was no public interest in
> sending the case to trial and instead referred the matter to
> restorative justice. Upon completion, the criminal charge will be
> dropped.
>
> "I have concerns about the timeline and concerns about the fact she
> was charged in the first place," Banfield's defence lawyer, James
> Lockyer, said Thursday.
>
>     Spouse of N.S. mass shooter shows how deadly rampage began in
> video re-enactment
>
>     Inquiry learns details of abuse, control suffered by spouse of
> N.S. mass shooter
>
> Erin Breen, a lawyer representing three sexual assault and justice
> groups — Avalon Sexual Assault Centre, Wellness Within, and the
> Women's Legal Education and Action Fund —  said she has concerns with
> the sequence of events.
>
> "It's always been a very troubling issue from our perspective. My
> clients were quite outraged when they learned that Ms. Banfield was
> being charged," she said.
>
> "Systemically it's a problem when a survivor comes forward and shares
> information about their survival behaviour and ends up getting charged
> in a criminal investigation."
> Banfield said she pleaded with gunman
>
> In the videos released Wednesday, Banfield explains how the couple had
> been marking their 19th anniversary when they began fighting.
>
> After she turned in for the night, Banfield said the gunman pulled the
> covers off the bed and assaulted her, kicking her into the bedpost. He
> then pulled her through the cottage, which she noticed was already
> doused in gasoline, and set the building on fire once they got
> outside, she told the investigator.
>
> Banfield said the gunman dragged her into the garage and tried to put
> her in handcuffs.
>
> "Looking at his eyes, there was nothing there," she said. "It was just so
> cold."
>
> Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left:
> Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean
> McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey
> Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row
> from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond,
> Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie
> Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)
>
> Banfield was able to escape — shoeless  — and hide for the next few
> hours, terrified he would find her as she heard gunshots.
>
> Medical records released through the inquiry show Banfield spent five
> nights in hospital after suffering a fractured rib and vertebrae, as
> well as extensive bruising and scrapes from the night of April 18.
>
>     N.S. mass shooter had a history of intimidation, violent altercations
>
>     N.S. gunman's spouse, set to undergo restorative justice, lived
> 'in survival mode,' says lawyer
>
> Other documents made public Thursday as part of the commission covered
> how the gunman used violence, emotional abuse and other controlling
> behaviour toward Banfield for nearly two decades.
> Push for more police training
>
> Megan Stephens, lawyer for Women's Shelters Canada, said she worries
> Banfield's experience will discourage other women from going to
> police.
>
> "I'm concerned about the message that people get because sometimes
> violence is such that people do need to call the police; there is no
> one else who could step in to protect them," she said.
>
> "But in this case, it feels like there were multiple failures of that,
> and the message that I think unfortunately women will get if they
> connect these dots, if they themselves are living in abusive
> relationships, is I don't know if that's the right option for me."
>
> WATCH | Inquiry hears from spouse of N.S. mass shooter about years of
> abuse, control
> Inquiry hears from spouse of N.S. mass shooter about years of abuse,
> control
> 1 day ago
> Duration 2:17
> The public inquiry into the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting released
> dramatic, previously unseen video and testimony from the gunman's
> spouse Wednesday. She described suffering years of abuse at the
> gunman's hand, including on the night he killed 22 people.
>
> Breen said she hopes the commission's work will at least spark a
> conversation about how police and the justice system should approach
> intimate partner abuse.
>
> "You see it quite commonly in situations where women are defending
> themselves in a violent conformation, end up getting charged with
> assault themselves," she said.
>
> "The current policy of a pro-arrest, pro-charge, pro-prosecution
> removes any choice or power from the person who has survived the
> violence."
>
> Stephens said she also hopes police get more training about how to
> recognize and better respond to abuse, including controlling
> behaviour.
>
> Lisa Banfield's running shoes, lost while fleeing Gabriel Wortman, are
> shown as commission counsel Gillian Hnatiw presents a foundational
> document about the violent behaviour that Wortman directed toward
> Banfield, his common-law spouse, at the Mass Casualty Commission
> inquiry into the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18 and 19,
> 2020, in Halifax on Wednesday, July 13, 2022. Wortman, dressed as an
> RCMP officer and driving a replica police cruiser, murdered 22 people.
> (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)
>
> "Intimate partner violence doesn't just involve discrete acts of
> physical violence, there are other ways in which controlling, coercive
> behaviour can really lead people to basically be stuck in situations
> and to have no control," she said.
>
> "Unfortunately, there is not enough training that goes into preparing
> officers who are on the front line. All the more so in some of these
> rural communities where you don't have specialists, you have
> generalists."
> Banfield felt 'betrayed' by re-enactment filming
>
> In an interview Banfield gave to a commission lawyer in April of this
> year, she said she felt ambushed by the re-enactment filming.
>
> She said she wanted to meet RCMP Sgt. Greg Vardy at the cottage in
> Portapique so he could see where her sneakers had been left and where
> she had hid overnight. It was the first time she had returned to the
> cottage since the night of the rampage.
>
> "I heard that people were thinking I'm lying about what happened, it's
> like, I thought if I go up there for the first time, I want somebody
> to see that, you know, to find my shoes, to find this tree, to find
> the things that I'm telling you that happened," she said.
>
> But Banfield said when she went to meet the Mountie, he had brought
> along a small audio and video crew.
>
> "It was just feeling like I was betrayed," she said.
>
> Her sister, Maureen, later jumps in on the interview. She said
> Banfield wasn't in the right mental shape to do the re-enactment.
>
> "Here's the thing that I feel is probably the deepest betrayal in
> terms of the manipulation of her actually being investigated without
> our knowledge," Maureen Banfield said.
>
> "It was horrific and I think it was very damning to her mentally, and
> that's for me, I think, the most egregious thing that took place in
> terms of her well-being and putting her first."
> Banfield not under investigation during filming
>
> A spokesperson for the RCMP said Banfield was not under investigation
> at the time of the re-enactment filming.
>
> "The victim/witness video re-enactment was related to a period of time
> where Ms. Banfield was a victim of multiple crimes. Given that she was
> not under investigation, it would not have been appropriate to provide
> her with rights that are given to a person who is being investigated
> for an offence or who is under arrest," said Cpl. Chris Marshall.
>
> "Lisa Banfield was provided her reason for arrest, rights to counsel
> and police warning, as required by the law, during the investigation
> in which she is charged with ammunition-related offences."
> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
> Catharine Tunney
>
> Reporter
>
> Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau,
> where she covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously
> for CBC in Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca
>
>     Follow Cat on Twitter
>
> With files from Haley Ryan
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/lisa-banfield-brian-brewster-james-banfield-defendants-lawsuit-1.5905649
>
> 3 accused of giving N.S. gunman ammunition named in lawsuit filed by
> families
> Lisa Banfield, James Banfield, Brian Brewster listed as defendants
> alongside shooter's estate
>
> Elizabeth McMillan · CBC News · Posted: Feb 08, 2021 3:27 PM AT
>
>
> The remains of a cottage and the burnt shell of a decommissioned RCMP
> cruiser are seen at a property in Portapique, N.S., that belonged to
> the gunman who killed 22 people on April 18 and 19. (Steve
> Lawrence/CBC)
>
> Three people accused of giving ammunition to the man responsible for
> killing 22 people in Nova Scotia have now been added as defendants to
> the proposed class-action lawsuit launched by families of the victims.
>
> On April 18 and 19, denturist Gabriel Wortman killed neighbours,
> acquaintances and strangers, and burned several homes, including his
> cottage, before being shot and killed by police in Enfield, N.S.
> During most of the attacks, he was driving a decommissioned cruiser
> that he'd adapted to look like a real RCMP vehicle.
>
> The gunman's common-law spouse, Lisa Banfield, 52, her brother James
> Blair Banfield, 54, of Beaver Bank, N.S., and her brother-in-law Brian
> Brewster, 60, of Lucasville, N.S., have been charged with unlawfully
> providing the shooter with .223-calibre Remington cartridges and
> .40-calibre Smith & Wesson cartridges in the month leading up to the
> massacre, which began in Portapique, N.S.
>
> Lisa Banfield is facing two counts and her relatives are each facing
> one count. They're all expected to enter pleas at their next court
> date in Dartmouth provincial court on March 9.
>
> Now, in addition to the criminal charges, the three are named in the
> lawsuit that argues they and the gunman's estate —which has been
> valued at $2.1 million — are liable to the families of the people who
> lost their lives, the estates and people who suffered damage to
> property and people who were injured due to Wortman's actions.
>
> There is a separate lawsuit families have filed against the RCMP and
> the province.
>
> Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19. Top row from left: Gina
> Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod,
> Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber,
> Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top:
> Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom
> Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie
> Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)
>
> The statement of claim filed against the estate alleges that in
> addition to killing 22 people, Wortman injured six people, killed five
> pets and burned or damaged three vehicles and four homes.
>
> Lisa Banfield, James Banfield and Brian Brewster's names were added to
> the lawsuit on Feb. 5. The other defendants include the public
> trustee, which is representing Wortman's estate, and three companies
> Wortman owned and controlled: Berkshire Broman Corp., Atlantic Denture
> Clinic Inc., and Northumberland Investments Inc.
>
> "Ultimately, our job is to protect the interests of the families of
> those lost in the April tragedies and of course the victims, the
> survivors of that tragedy as well," said lawyer Sandra McCulloch, who
> represents the plaintiffs. "That requires us pursuing this avenue of
> potential recourse and accountability and answers for our families."
>
> In order to proceed as a class action, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court
> must certify the lawsuit. That has not yet happened. None of the named
> defendants have filed statements in response to the allegations made
> by the plaintiffs.
>
> The burned remains of Gabriel Wortman’s cottage in Portapique, N.S.
> Wortman disguised himself as a Mountie and over the course of 13 hours
> the night of April 18, 2020, and the following morning travelled
> nearly 200 kilometres in and around Portapique, killing 22 people.
> (Steve Lawrence/CBC)
>
> When the RCMP announced the criminal charges in December, the force
> said the trio were not aware of Wortman's plans.
>
> The criminal case "coupled with the other information and evidence
> that we've been gathering on our end adds up to there being support
> for some degree of culpability on the part of each of those
> individuals," said McCulloch.
> Lawsuit alleges spouse acquired gasoline
>
> The updated statement of claim alleges that Lisa Banfield "was aware
> of and facilitated Wortman's preparations, including but not limited
> to, his accumulation of firearms, ammunition, other weapons, gasoline,
> police paraphernalia, and the outfitting of a replica RCMP vehicle."
>
> It alleges Banfield "directly acquired some of the accelerants and
> ammunition used by Wortman in the crime spree" and that James Banfield
> and Brian Brewster also "directly acquired" ammunition.
>
> The proposed lawsuit claims all three were "negligent in [the]
> acquisition of these items" and that they "knew or ought to have known
> that Wortman had tortious intentions."
>
> McCulloch declined to elaborate on the exact nature of the additional
> evidence gathered to support the allegations.
>
> The investigative firm Martin and Associates has been working with
> Patterson Law since the law firm was retained by the families. Last
> fall it set up a website to collect tips and information related to
> the mass shootings.
>
> Though police have said Lisa Banfield was the first victim of violence
> in Portapique on April 18, she was always excluded as a plaintiff from
> the families' lawsuit.
>
> "From our perspective, there has always been a possibility of a
> conflict of interest between [Banfield's] interest and those of our
> clients. And you're seeing that now manifest itself in our
> amendments," said McCulloch.
> Spouse suing estate separately
>
> In a separate civil case, however, Banfield is also suing her former
> partner's estate, which includes six properties, three corporations
> and $705,000 in cash seized from the wreckage of the couple's cottage
> in Portapique.
>
> In her statement of claim, which was filed with the Nova Scotia
> Supreme Court last summer, Banfield said she was the victim of assault
> and battery, and suffered physical, emotional and psychological
> injuries and trauma.
>
> Search warrant documents show several people told investigators
> Banfield, who lived with Wortman above the denture clinic in Dartmouth
> where they both worked, was abused during their 19-year relationship.
>
> Lawyers representing Banfield are also opposing the application by CBC
> and other media organizations to lift some redactions in the search
> warrants related to the mass shooting investigation.
> Banfield opposed to lifting redactions
>
> In documents filed with the court on Feb. 5, James Lockyer and Jessica
> Zita, the Toronto lawyers who are representing Banfield, argue that 13
> redacted paragraphs should remain blacked out because they explain the
> Crown's case against their client and "invades Lisa solicitor-client
> privilege."
>
> One paragraph is a summary of a statement Banfield's friend and lawyer
> Kevin van Bargen gave to police.
>
> "His information deals with business and financial affairs, unrelated
> and peripheral to the events. This invasion of Lisa's solicitor-client
> privilege is unwarranted, would not be permitted at her trial, and
> should not be provided to the media," the lawyers stated in the
> filings.
>
> Their filings said Lisa Banfield gave four statements to police, on
> April 19, April 20, April 28 and July 28. They said the other sections
> that should remain redacted pertain to her statements and those made
> by her co-accused and other family members who spoke to police between
> April and July.
>
> Meanwhile, work on a public inquiry into the mass killings is
> underway. Last month the commission announced the staff who will lead
> the teams involved in the joint federal-provincial inquiry.
> ABOUT THE AUTHOR
> Elizabeth McMillan
>
> Elizabeth McMillan is a journalist with CBC in Halifax. Over the past
> 13 years, she has reported from the edge of the Arctic Ocean to the
> Atlantic Coast and loves sharing people's stories. Please send tips
> and feedback to elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
> Cross-examination of N.S. killer's spouse could promote conspiracy
> theories: lawyer
>
> Michael MacDonald and Michael Tutton
> The Canadian Press
> Published July 14, 2022 3:29 p.m. ADT
>
> HALIFAX -
>
> There are good reasons why the spouse of the man responsible for the
> worst mass shooting in modern Canadian history should not face
> cross-examination when she testifies Friday before a public inquiry,
> her lawyer says.
>
> James Lockyer said Thursday his client, Lisa Banfield, should not be
> retraumatized by lawyers who seem determined to explore conspiracy
> theories about what happened April 18-19, 2020, when Gabriel Wortman
> killed 22 people during a 13-hour rampage across Nova Scotia.
>
> The Toronto lawyer said some lawyers who represent victims' families
> appear keen to ask Banfield how she managed to escape from her
> deranged partner and survive a bitterly cold night in the woods around
> Portapique, N.S., on the first night of the rampage.
>
> "Some of the lawyers, one or two of them, have been pretty hyperbolic
> in their statements," Lockyer said in an interview with The Canadian
> Press.
>
> "They talk of wanting to cross-examine her about certain aspects of
> her trauma that night without ever explaining their goals. And their
> goals, when you think about it, can only be conspiracy-theorist
> goals."
>
> Lockyer said the purpose of raising questions about Banfield's
> whereabouts would be to challenge her credibility and suggest that she
> may have spent the night elsewhere, which he says is absurd.
>
> "These mass casualty events, particularly (those) we've seen south of
> the border, do give rise to conspiracy theorists," Lockyer said. "We
> don't need that in Canada. We don't need that in Nova Scotia. I think
> the commission is to be congratulated that they're not willing to
> entertain it."
>
> Lawyer Michael Scott, whose firm represents 14 of the victims'
> families, challenged Lockyer's conspiracy comments, arguing that the
> inquiry's decision to limit questioning will leave lingering doubts
> about Banfield's testimony.
>
> "There are very good questions to be asked about how she survived
> overnight," Scott said Thursday. "And by arranging a process where
> nobody is allowed to ask reasonable questions, then this promotes
> conspiracy theories."
>
> The three commissioners overseeing the federal-provincial inquiry
> recently decided Banfield will not face cross-examination from lawyers
> who represent relatives of the victims, mainly because she could be
> traumatized by having to relive the violence she endured.
>
> The inquiry has heard evidence that Banfield, whose relationship with
> Wortman spanned 19 years, was the victim of a controlling, abusive man
> who repeatedly beat her. Banfield has also told the RCMP and the
> commission that she was beaten and threatened immediately before her
> husband started killing people in Portapique.
>
> On Thursday, the commission issued written reasons for its decision to
> limit questioning of Banfield, arguing that the role of a public
> inquiry is not the same as a trial.
>
> "We have been clear from the beginning that this is not an
> adversarial, trial-like proceeding," the ruling says. The decision
> says the commission's approach "represents the most effective way to
> gather Ms. Banfield's best evidence."
>
> Sandra McCulloch, a lawyer who works at the same firm as Scott, said
> inquiries and trials should share a commitment to finding facts.
>
> "As much as we're in a different kind of legal proceeding, we're still
> in a proceeding where we have to have reliable evidence, and part of
> having reliable evidence is allowing it to be tested," McCulloch said.
> "That's largely not going to happen."
>
> McCulloch is concerned that Banfield will not be asked about her
> partner's violent behaviour while they were together on that deadly
> weekend in April 2020.
>
> In an earlier statement, the commission said Banfield may be
> accompanied by two support people and will "address remaining
> questions relevant to the commission's mandate."
>
> Earlier this week, the commission released a 100-page document based
> on evidence provided by Banfield during four interviews with the RCMP
> and five interviews with the inquiry. That document provided extensive
> details about the killer's long history of gender-based violence.
>
> As well, the inquiry on Wednesday was shown a video recording of a
> 90-minute RCMP interview, which featured Banfield providing a detailed
> description of what happened to her on the night of April 18, 2020.
>
> The commission has confirmed participating lawyers have been invited
> to submit questions in advance of Banfield's testimony, and they can
> bring forward further questions on Friday.
>
> Scott has said his clients have instructed him not to submit written
> questions for Banfield because doing so would lend legitimacy to a
> flawed process.
>
> Lawyers for some families boycotted proceedings in May after the
> inquiry prevented cross-examination of two RCMP staff sergeants who
> oversaw the early response to the mass shooting.
>
> Lockyer said his client was feeling apprehensive about appearing
> before the inquiry, which will be the first time she has spoken in
> public about the tragedy.
>
> "I know ... she says to herself, `If I hadn't run and got away, would
> I have saved 22 lives?' And of course she says that to herself and
> always will. The probable answer is that it would have been 23 lives
> and not 22, but she's never going to believe that."
>
> It's important to remember that Banfield was the first victim of the
> "mass casualty" event, he said.
>
> "I don't think Lisa sees herself as a victim. She's too conscious of
> the people who were killed and their families. It's going to be a
> difficult day for her."
>
> This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 14, 2022.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Bergen, Candice - M.P."<candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:44 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
> that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
> No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> On behalf of the Hon. Candice Bergen, thank you for contacting the
> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.
>
> Ms. Bergen greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
> and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
> receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
> possible.
>
> If you are a constituent of Ms. Bergen’s in Portage-Lisgar with an
> urgent matter please provide complete contact information.  Not
> identifying yourself as a constituent could result in a delayed
> response.
>
> Once again, thank you for writing.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
> ------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> Au nom de l’hon. Candice Bergen, nous vous remercions de communiquer
> avec le Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle.
>
> Mme Bergen accorde une grande importance aux commentaires des
> Canadiens.  Nous lisons et étudions tous les courriels entrants.
> Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.  Nous y
> répondons le plus rapidement possible.
>
> Si vous faites partie de l’électorat de Mme Bergen dans la
> circonscription de Portage-Lisgar et que votre affaire est urgente,
> veuillez fournir vos coordonnées complètes.  Si vous ne le faites pas,
> cela pourrait retarder la réponse.
>
> Nous vous remercions une fois encore d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.
>
> Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
>
> Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Rempel, Michelle - M.P."<Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
> that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
> No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> On behalf of the Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P. thank
> you for your email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in
> touch with the MP. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our
> office receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded
> to:
>
> If you are a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:
>
> Queries regarding government programs, policies and operations take
> time to research, contact appropriate departments and collate
> information for dissemination to you. If you have provided your full
> contact details on your query, your email will be responded to as
> necessary.
>
> If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, tax issues,
> etc.), consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can
> be activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent
> form, a staff member will be in contact with you.
>
> If you are not a constituent of Calgary Nose Hill:
>
> If you are not a Calgary Nose Hill resident, given the high volume of
> emails we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as
> INFORMATION. If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be
> responded to as necessary.
> If you are contacting MP Rempel Garner to review your case work,
> please first contact your local MP for assistance.
> If your email is a form letter:
>
> Thank you for submitting this form letter. Due to the high volume of
> emails M.P. Rempel Garner’s office receives, we are unable to
> individually reply to form letters, particularly from non
> constituents. Form letters are template letters generated by
> organizations, webforms and other sources on a given issue. However,
> M.P. Rempel Garner does review and consider information received from
> all form letters.
>
> If you are a constituent and would like a response regarding the
> specific issue raised in your form letter, please email M.P. Rempel
> Garner’s office individually at this email address with “Constituent -
> (Insert subject)” in the subject of your email. This helps us to
> identify constituents who wish to receive a response among the
> hundreds of form letter responses our office receives on any given
> day.
>
> Again, thank you for reaching out to our office.
>
> Invites:
> If you have invited MP Rempel Garner to your event, please note that
> decisions on what events to attend are completed on a bi-monthly
> basis. As our office receives hundreds of invitations each week, our
> office will only contact you if MP Rempel Garner will be attending.
> Updates on MP Rempel Garner’s Work:
> If you wish to know what is happening in Calgary Nose Hill and the job
> MP Rempel Garner is doing for you in Ottawa, please sign up for her
> e-newsletter on her website: https://mprempel.ca/
> *M.P. Rempel Garner's office has a zero tolerance policy for
> threatening, abusive, or aggressive language or behaviour towards the
> Member and their staff. Phone calls, voicemails and emails containing
> threatening or abusive language will result in the termination of
> communications.
>
> Thank you again.
>
> Sincerely,
> Office of The Honourable Michelle Rempel Garner, P.C., M.P.
> Calgary Nose Hill
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Kennedy, Aaron"<akennedy@quispamsis.ca>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:55 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
> that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
> No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email.
> I am out of the office until Monday, and will respond at that time. If
> you require immediate assistance, please call 849-5778.
> - Aaron
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:42 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for your email
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
> confirmation your message has been received.
>
> As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
> correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
> correspondence identified as requiring a response.
>
> If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
> Government of Nova Scotia please visit:
> http://novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CJane.MacDonald%40novascotia.ca%7Ceeca3674da1940841c1b08da0c273c2c%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637835659900957160%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2BUnVWeFXmCZiYsg7%2F6%2Bw55jn3t3WTeGL9l%2BLp%2BNkqNU%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Premier’s Correspondence Team
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 13:20:44 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
> that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
> No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
> that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
> reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Tom Taggart <tom.taggartmla@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 06:18:42 -0700
> Subject: Re: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was that he would
> not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday No doubt a
> host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for contacting us at the office of MLA Tom.Taggart. This
> email is being monitored by my Constituency Assistant Andrea. Johnson,
> who will get back to you as soon as possible. If your inquiry is
> urgent, please feel free to call the Constituency Office @
> 902-641-2335
>
> Our Office is located @ 10653 Hwy 2 Masstown, Nova Scotia, right next
> door to the Petro- Canada.
> Our Office hours are Monday- Friday 8:30am - 3:30pm or by appointment.
> We are closed on Holidays.
>
> --
> Tom Taggart, MLA
> Colchester North
> (O) - 902-641-2335
> tom.taggartmla@gmail.com
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 10:18:37 -0300
> Subject: Re: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was that he would
> not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday No doubt a
> host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
> To: THopper@postmedia.com, "jagmeet.singh"<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
> Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca, "pierre.poilievre"
> <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, jennifer@halifaxexaminer.ca,
> paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, Tom.Taggartmla@gmail.com,
> darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca, bmassey@justice.gc.ca, "Amato, Mike #509"
> <509@yrp.ca>, brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
> "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
> "Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
> "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
> <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "michelle.rempel"
> <michelle.rempel@parl.gc.ca>, kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca
,
> Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
> "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>, akennedy@quispamsis.ca,
> "elizabeth.mcmillan"<elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca>, Justice Minister
> <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, PREMIER@novascotia.ca, andrewjdouglas
> <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca,
> NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, tim
> <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca, "jan.jensen"
> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, washington field
> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
> briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid
> <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "stefanos.karatopis"
> <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
, "sylvie.gadoury"
> <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
> "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
, "Bill.Hogan"
> <Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>
>
> https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/episodes/nova-scotia-mass-shooting-220710
>
> the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 10 - 11, 2022 - Weekly updates
> and revelations (with Paul Palango)
>
> In this double episode I share my two recent conversations with Paul
> Palango. The first, recorded on July 10th, is our discussion
> surrounding the interview with Rob the carpenter. The second, recorded
> the next day, is an emergency update in which Paul and I discuss the
> bizarre lie the that Rob the Carpenter told… and what that means to
> the broader story.
>
> Episode Links:
>
> the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting Series:
> https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/nova-scotia-rampage
>
> Join the Nova Scotia Mass Casualty Discussion Group:
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/novascotiamasscasualty
>
> Send a tip related to this case: https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/cont
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/FrankNews/photos/a.116131900032611/325844615728004/?type=3
>
>   ·
> Dear Frank:
> I’m not a fan of your magazine; however, recently you have stepped out
> of the fray and produced some very good journalism. Your interview
> with Gabriel Wortman’s father being the most noteworthy. Some of your
> Portapique coverage is noteworthy. Frank has a place in society.
> However, your recent inclusion of Paul Palango is pointing you and our
> neighbours in a very dark place as a society. I can’t reveal my real
> identity due to my employment as I would be shunned by my colleagues
> in media. I am aware, based on verifiable information that the
> Canadian mainstream media has turned its back on Paul Palango, who was
> a onetime trusted news source and held respect.
> The tide began to shift several years ago when some of his views were
> not based on credible information, but conjecture and speculation or
> as the mainstream media believes, he is falling into some mental
> health crisis.
> Maclean’s leaned into Paul because he seemed to have information
> nobody else had, and produced sources within the Mounties. It’s just
> they were not credible, and had an axe to grind. Maclean’s verified
> this fact and they cut Paul loose after that infamous story from last
> June.
> And they told other media sources that he is treacherous.
> A colleague is working on a story about Lisa Banfield that has her and
> her lawyer working on a libel suit against Frank and Paul. My sources
> tell me the Mounties have nothing to suggest she is misaligned and
> very much is a victim. After the inquiry and the evidence comes out
> they will be positioned to be successful in showing Palango was
> libellous.
> I support what you do, I don’t agree with the style, but we are a free
> society. My only reason for stepping in is that you are printing what
> will be shown to be his false narrative based on untrustworthy sources
> and possibly mental illness.
> Ivana Smear,
> Via email
>
> Dear Ms. Smear:
> This may come as a surprise to you, but I’ve heard this all before.
> My position is very clear.
> Since the first reports of gunshots at Portapique Beach on April 18,
> 2020, the response by the RCMP has been stranger than strange.
> The Mounties arrived on scene in time to potentially trap the killer
> in the community and perhaps prevent at least the last five murders.
> Instead, Wortman got past them, had a rest in Debert, and then was
> allowed to roam around Nova Scotia, killing nine more people.
> Lisa Banfield says she hid in the woods for about eight hours on a
> blistering cold night. She went to Leon Joudrey’s house at 6:34 a.m.
> He has told many reporters and the police that he did not believe her
> story.
> The earliest reports claimed Banfield suffered severe injuries from a
> beating administered by Gabriel Wortman.
> Actually, the RCMP and the Crown blacked out the first description of
> those injuries. The word they blacked out was “minor,” which was
> consistent with what Joudrey said.
> You suggest that I am treacherous and not trusted by the mainstream
> media because of a story you highlighted in Maclean’s magazine from
> last June.
> For that story we obtained a copy of the RCMP’s undercover manual.
> Among other things described in that document are the procedures the
> force should use in a blown undercover operation.
> The actions of the RCMP before, during and after the weekend of April
> 18-19 largely conform to the procedures described. I’ve spent the past
> eight months trying to disprove that there was an undercover operation
> in Portapique — to no avail.
> The more I investigate the more it appears that someone in Wortman’s
> circle appeared to have a special relationship with the authorities —
> be they the RCMP, Halifax Police or even CSIS. Nothing is conclusive,
> but that doesn’t mean you just give up because it’s too difficult.
> That isn’t in my DNA.
> My role as a journalist is to act as a disinterested investigator
> whose duty it is to uncover the truth and show no fear or favouritism
> to anyone. Like a pathologist, I am a friend of the dead. As Joseph
> Pulitizer once put it: “Newspapers should have no friends.”
> I am not here to be liked. I am not in it for the money, although some
> uninformed critics have wrongly accused me of being so. I am here to
> be the agent of the story and to do what it dictates that I must do.
> As for Ms. Banfield, I believe it is in the public interest that her
> story be fully examined because she was apparently the last person to
> see Wortman before he went on his rampage.
> You say Maclean’s dropped me because I was unreliable.
> I can assure you that is not what happened.
> I withdrew my story and chose to run it in Frank, as written.
> That same story generated a number of leads which lead to the
> discovery of the Pictou County analog recordings from the weekend in
> question.
> Stories about what was on those tapes brought even more stories and leads.
> That’s what good journalists do.
> As for my mental health, some people think I’m crazy for doing what
> I’m doing. I have a nice, comfortable life. I took this on to help
> other journalists, but when I found their work wanting, I got more and
> more involved. That being the case, maybe I do have a mental health
> issue. I admit that I can be a pain in the ass, but I always strive to
> do the right thing.
> The funny thing about my mental health is that the one agency slyly
> pushing that narrative has been the RCMP.
> “Look at the source,” referring to me, when another reporter tried
> following up one of my stories.
> “Another fairy tale,” Supt. Darren Campbell put it to the CBC’s
> Elizabeth McMillan when commenting on another story. I stand by my
> work in the past and now. Don’t you find it disturbing that the RCMP
> is willing to invest in character assassination rather than address
> the very real issues raised about his dysfunctional organization?
> That’s not a good thing in a supposed democracy.
> If you still insist on pushing the mental health angle, perhaps we can
> both submit to a Rorschach test to determine who sees the crazier
> stuff in the inkblots.
> You also state that Banfield and her lawyer, James Lockyer, are
> planning to sue me sometime down the road.
> I know Mr. Lockyer from my days in Toronto. He lived on the next block
> when he was defending Rubin (Hurricane) Carter, who strolled by my
> house on his regular walks. Lockyer is a good lawyer and always has
> been. He’s got to do what he thinks is best for his client.
> If Banfield is truly planning to head down that road, I would give her
> and Lockyer the following advice.
> This is not my first rodeo. As a corporate journalist and as an
> individual over the course of my career, I’ve been involved in about
> 18 major lawsuits (mostly on behalf of reporters who worked for me)
> and occasionally as a plaintiff. I’m 16 and 0 with a couple of draws.
> My last case should be seen as instructive.
> In the mid-1990s, a group of individuals hiding behind a $3-billion
> corporation listed on the New York Stock Exchange sued me for
> $11-million to stop me from asking questions about them. It didn’t
> stop me. They went up to $20 million. It still didn’t stop me. They
> tried to hire hit man Ken Murdock to kill me. Murdock turned down the
> job because he didn’t think it was right to kill a civilian.
> How do I know? I met him. I spent four days in the maximum-security
> Kingston Penitentiary interviewing him.
> I didn’t counter-sue the company. Instead, I launched an entirely
> different suit against it, its executives and lawyers. I called their
> lawsuit “public relations.” It ended up being an almost 10-year fight.
> The company went bankrupt, but the individuals didn’t. I ended up
> getting a nice house of it.
> The bottom line is this. I am prepared to take the slings and many
> arrows that are fired back at me as a result of what I write.
> But attacking the messenger is what the desperate and corrupt have
> always done. It’s as old as the Old Testament. Look up Malachi.
> The Greek philosopher Sophocles put it this way: “No one loves the
> messenger who brings bad news.”
> And here’s my take on it all: If you don’t like what I’m reporting and
> writing, get off your butt, suck up some courage, do some of your own
> investigating and either confirm what I’m reporting or prove me wrong.
> You’d be doing everyone a favour — including yourself.
> Paul Palango,
> Chester
>
> Attacking the messenger...
> https://www.frankmagazine.ca/sing.../attacking-the-messenger See less
> Comments
> Nicholas Langille
> Give it to em Paul.
> If the rcmp had answers that could be strung together coherently maybe
> I could trust what they say. But that hasn't happened .… See more
>
>     Reply
>     1y
>
> Jim Barkhouse
> Thank you Paul for your in depth coverage of this tragedy, your
> pursuit of the truth will set the facts straight and will be
> appreciated by all.
>
>     Reply
>     1y
>
> Donna Marie Jessome
> Wtg Mr. Palango, Keep doing You!
> You and LGC are basically all we really have in this Massacre ,who are
> trying your darntest to bring the truth forward and for that I Thank
> You.
>
>     Reply
>     1y
>
> Kelly Smales
> This is awesome Paul. We need more courageous journalists like you!
>
>     Reply
>     1y
>
> Christine Elliott
> Excellent response Paul. as is your work. You’ve been tireless with
> the Portipique story and your past work about the RCMP is so valuable.
>
>     Reply
>     1y
>
> Paula Jarrett
> Excellent work - keep going. People impacted by this horror deserve
> nothing less. We all deserve nothing less.
>
>         Reply
>         1y
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 07:24:06 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: The last thing Palango told Bonaparte was
> that he would not waste his time listening to Lisa Banfield on Friday
> No doubt a host of other snobby journalists will Correct Tristin Hopper?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
> that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
> reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.
>
>
>
> On 7/15/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> However the former Attorney General refused to look on the internet to
>> verify what I said was true. So I gave up on his bullshit and told him
>> to answer me in writing because I could easily the lawyer got the
>> damned email. Lockyer just refused to admit it tis all.
>>
>> Go Figure Why I brought this up today
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xzms5ivv5DE
>>
>> MCC- DAY 50 - LISA BANFIELD... AND HANDLERS
>> 229 watching now
>> Started streaming 2 hours ago
>> 82
>> Dislike
>> Share
>> Clip
>> Save
>> Little Grey Cells
>> 3.42K subscribers
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 10:53:43 -0400
>> Subject: Hey There Jeska Grue.and James Lockyer RE Federal Court File
>> No T-1557-15 I just called both of you about our common concerns about
>> war
>> To: heythere@jeskagrue.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
>> dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca, james.lockyer@umoncton.ca,
>> ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca
>> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca,
>> Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca, greg.thompson2@gnb.ca,
>> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, Marc.Leger@gnb.ca, lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca,
>> infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca, briangallant10@gmail.com,
>> serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
>> steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca,
>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>
>> I tried to explain now go figure things out for yourselves
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/armoured-car-cougar-sackville-memorial-park-1.5178986
>>
>> Controversial armoured vehicle to be set up in Sackville Memorial
>> Park, upsets residents
>>
>> While residents agree veterans deserve to be commemorated, some worry
>> the armoured vehicle glorifies war
>> Tori Weldon · CBC News · Posted: Jun 18, 2019 7:08 AM AT
>>
>> "Jeska Grue, whose backyard backs onto the park, said what's already
>> there is plenty.
>>
>> "I don't feel that it's the best way for a memorial park [to]
>> commemorate veterans and those affected by war."
>>
>> Grue said an armoured vehicle could be an upsetting symbol for people
>> who have first-hand experience with war.
>>
>> Her grandfather served in the Second World War, where he worked as a
>> tank mechanic.
>>
>> "He did suffer from [post-traumatic stress disorder] and alcoholism
>> for the rest of his life," she said. "To me, that's the memory that it
>> draws."
>>
>> Grue said refugees starting a new life in Sackville may also be
>> troubled by the armoured vehicle sitting in the middle of town.
>>
>> But Jim Lockyer, honorary colonel of the 8th Canadian Hussars, said
>> the Cougar should act as a way to commemorate previous battles.
>>
>> "This is not glorifying war, if anything it's a memento to discourage
>> it."
>>
>> He's toured fields in Italy where soldiers belonging to the 8th
>> Canadian Hussars lost their lives fighting during the Second World
>> War.
>>
>> "There are young men, 18 to 25 years old, one of whom was Stedman
>> Henderson from Moncton, who again did not come home and they're still
>> there," he said.
>>
>> "So it's a testimonial to their contribution."
>>
>>
>>  90 Comments
>>
>>
>> David Amos
>> Methinks anyone can Google "Fundy Royal Debate" then go to the 28
>> minute mark and listen closely N'esy Pas?
>>
>> John Smith
>> Reply to @David Amos: david do you always ref your public speaking
>> engagements because your not permitted to think and speak of them out
>> loud in a public square maybe try a jesters hat traditionally they
>> were permitted to criticize the king and aristocrats
>>
>> David Amos
>> Reply to @john smith: Methinks you should finally read my lawsuit
>> (Federal Court File No T- 1557-15)Paragraph 83 would be a could place
>> t start with regards to this issue N'esy Pas?
>>
>> https://twitter.com/jeskagrue
>>
>> https://jeskagrue.ca/info
>>
>>  CONTACT/LOCATION
>>
>> heythere@jeskagrue.ca
>>
>> 902-880-4783
>>
>> JG lives very close to the Waterfowl Park.
>>
>> James E. Lockyer, Q.C.
>> Université de Moncton
>> Professeur:
>> Faculté de droit
>> Edifice A.J. Cormier
>> Moncton, New Brunswick E1A 3E9
>> Phone: 506-863-2134
>> Fax: 506-858-4534
>> Email: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
>> Subject: You wished to speak with me
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
>> years.
>>
>>
>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
>> productive use of either of our time.
>>
>>
>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
>> given due consideration.
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>>
>> Charles Murray
>>
>> Ombud NB
>>
>> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:48:58 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>> From: "David Raymond Amos"davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>>>> Subject: I already know that you are as crooked as Hell Mr Leger. I am
>>>>> fishing for an honest cop not another corrupt bureaucrat. i am just
>>>>> proving that you know the truth Get it?
>>>>> To: Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> CC: Day.S@parl.gc.ca, John.Foran@gnb.ca, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca,
>>>>> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
>>>>> infomorning@moncton.cbc.ca, infomorning@halifax.cbc.ca,
>>>>> webo@xplornet.com, Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, samperrier@hotmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>>>> Scott.A@parl.gc.ca, amerrino@gmail.com, deanr0032@hotmail.com,
>>>>> wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, rfowlo@comcast.net, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, pcollin@cpa-acp.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Mr. Amos
>>>>> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 11:41:22 -0300
>>>>> From: "Leger, Marc (DPS/MSP)"Marc.Leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: "David Raymond Amos"davidramos333@yahoo.ca
>>>>> David Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not able to address your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> Your calls and emails are not welcome and I would like you to stop
>>>>> communicating with me by phone and email
>>>>>
>>>>> Marc Léger
>>>>> Deputy Minister / Sous-ministre
>>>>> Public Safety / Sécurité publique
>>>>> (506) 453-7412 marc.leger@gnb.ca
>>>>> Working together to build a safer New Brunswick / Travaillons ensemble
>>>>> pour bâtir un Nouveau-Brunswick plus sûr
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
>>>> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
>>>> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
>>>> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
>>>> as usual
>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> (Français à suivre)
>>>>
>>>> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
>>>> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
>>>> ‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> Merci.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
>>>> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
>>>> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
>>>> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, John.McNair@snb.ca,
>>>> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
>>>> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>>
>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>>
>>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>>
>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>>
>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>>
>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>>
>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>>
>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>>
>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>>
>>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>>
>>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>>
>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>>
>>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>>
>>>>> Defendant
>>>>>
>>>>> ORDER
>>>>>
>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>>
>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>>>> he stated:
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>>> Police.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>>
>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>> Judge
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>>
>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>>> most
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Merci ,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject:
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>>
>>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>>
>>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>>
>>>>> CM/cb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>
>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>>> ilian.html
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>>> cards?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>>> The Supreme Court
>>>>
>>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>>
>>>> Amos v. Canada
>>>> Court (s) Database
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>> Date
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-30
>>>> Neutral citation
>>>>
>>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>>> File numbers
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>>
>>>> THE COURT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>>
>>>> I.                    Introduction
>>>>
>>>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>>
>>>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>>>
>>>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>>
>>>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>>> c. F-7:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal.
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>>> […]
>>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>>
>>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>>> section.
>>>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>>> that:
>>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>>> appeal book.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias:
>>>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>>
>>>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>>> (4th) 193).
>>>>
>>>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>>> (emphasis added)
>>>>
>>>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>>
>>>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>>
>>>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>>
>>>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>>
>>>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>>> to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> III.               Issue
>>>>
>>>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>>
>>>> IV.              Analysis
>>>>
>>>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>>>
>>>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>>
>>>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>>> interfere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>>
>>>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>>
>>>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>>> (…)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>>> para. 27).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>>
>>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>>
>>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>>
>>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>>
>>>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>>
>>>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>>
>>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>>> of process…
>>>>
>>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>>
>>>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>>
>>>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>>
>>>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>>
>>>> V.                 Conclusion
>>>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>>> without leave to amend.
>>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "David G. Near"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>>> J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>>
>>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>>> DOCKET:
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton,
>>>> New Brunswick
>>>>
>>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> May 24, 2017
>>>>
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>> DATED:
>>>>
>>>> October 30, 2017
>>>>
>>>> APPEARANCES:
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>>
>>>> Jan Jensen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://www.facebook.com/johnwilliamsonNB/photos/a.848901995163272.1073741826.172576949462450/1765074580212671/?type=3
>>>>
>>>> John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick
>>>> Southwest
>>>> May 17 at 12:48pm ·
>>>>
>>>> Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
>>>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
>>>> the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.
>>>>
>>>> Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
>>>> issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
>>>> Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
>>>> 2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
>>>> that his local campaign was strong.
>>>>
>>>> How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
>>>> John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
>>>> here: https://donate.conservative.ca/membership/
>>>>
>>>> There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
>>>> be made, and events already planned.
>>>>
>>>> Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
>>>> 506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!
>>>>
>>>> Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
>>>> ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.
>>>>
>>>> And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
>>>> and to learn about upcoming events.
>>>>
>>>> Go John! And Vote John W!
>>>>
>>>> Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
>>>> Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
>>>> federal politics
>>>> CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT | Last Updated: May 28
>>>> Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he
>>>> won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)
>>>>
>>>> New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its
>>>> highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.
>>>>
>>>> Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead
>>>> jump into federal politics.
>>>>
>>>> Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA
>>>> said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who
>>>> beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.
>>>>
>>>> "It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong
>>>> voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my
>>>> heart.
>>>>
>>>> "I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's
>>>> very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis,
>>>> I want to move on."
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
>>>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
>>>> riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative
>>>> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes
>>>> part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>>>
>>>>     Health critic slams 'gutting' of top doctor's office
>>>>
>>>>     Blaine Higgs faces internal PC dissent over appointment
>>>>
>>>> That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John
>>>> Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the
>>>> riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding
>>>> will nominate their candidate June 28.
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton.
>>>> The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with
>>>> national organizations that advocate for veterans.
>>>>
>>>> "I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he
>>>> said.
>>>>
>>>>     Blaine Higgs wins N.B. PC leadership race on 3rd ballot
>>>>
>>>>     Tory leadership hopefuls scramble to be 'second choice' of rivals'
>>>> supporters
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC
>>>> leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under
>>>> Higgs.
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and
>>>> the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of
>>>> becoming a minister.
>>>>
>>>> But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it
>>>> does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go
>>>> another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my
>>>> options would be limited after that."
>>>>
>>>> The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him
>>>> realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
>>>> years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
>>>> Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
>>>> Fredericton for the 2008 election.
>>>>
>>>> After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
>>>> Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
>>>> the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
>>>> defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive
>>>> Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
>>>>
>>>> In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the
>>>> first ballot out of seven candidates.
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial
>>>> party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.
>>>>
>>>> "It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre
>>>> candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:37:04 -0400
>>>>> Subject: Birth Certificates of David and Max Amos
>>>>> To: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca
>>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Assistant (Property): Samantha Williams
>>>>>
>>>>> Direct Line: (506) 648-0373
>>>>> Email: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: mike gauvin <mikegauvin@live.ca>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 01:29:25 +0000
>>>>> Subject: Re: 83 Valley Road FYI this is a document I may employ BTW I
>>>>> am in Saint John tommorrow attending a hearing at the EUB
>>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tomorrow Iam going to talk to a guy that should do it.
>>>>> ______________________________
__
>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>> Sent: October 11, 2018 11:38:58 AM
>>>>> To: mike gauvin; swilliams; serge.gauvin; mrichard; serge.rousselle;
>>>>> david.eidt
>>>>> Cc: David Amos; greg.byrne; brian.gallant; David.Coon;
>>>>> kris.austin@gnb.ca; blaine.higgs; robert.gauvin@gnb.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: 83 Valley Road FYI this is a document I may employ BTW I
>>>>> am in Saint John tommorrow attending a hearing at the EUB
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.legaldeeds.com/Interface/Services/Conveyances/Canada/NB/contract_of_purchase_and_sale_of_real_property/questionnaire.php
>>>>>
>>>>> New Brunswick Contract of Purchase and Sale of Real Property will
>>>>> provide you with a custom completed contract of purchase and sale of
>>>>> real property used in the sale of residential or recreational real
>>>>> estate in New Brunswick. This document is a must for anyone buying or
>>>>> selling a home or lot privately in New Brunswick.
>>>>>
>>>>> By simply answering a few questions our service will produce for you
>>>>> an online custom completed contract, ready to be signed by the buyer
>>>>> and the seller.
>>>>>
>>>>> This document includes simple and straight forward instructions to
>>>>> enable you to execute quickly and effortlessly. A subject removal form
>>>>> is also included for your convenience. The cost of the personalized
>>>>> Contract of Purchase and Sale is $15.00, payable in Canadian dollars.
>>>>> Within a few minutes, you will receive your completed PDF documents by
>>>>> email.
>>>>>
>>>>> To proceed, complete the entries.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 10/10/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Obviously I have the same problem with every lawyer in New Brunswick.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you still wish to follow though on the deal. I will do as I
>>>>>> promised and pay you in full and get you to swear out and purchase
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> sale agreement properly witnessed by SNB and handle this matter
>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 10/10/18, mike gauvin <mikegauvin@live.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>> Mosher Chedore replied to me that it's a conflict and cannot
>>>>>>> represent
>>>>>>> me.
>>>>>>> ______________________________
__
>>>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Sent: October 9, 2018 9:57:18 AM
>>>>>>> To: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca; mikegauvin@live.ca
>>>>>>> Cc: David Amos
>>>>>>> Subject: I have yet to receive a response Why?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:37:04 -0400
>>>>>>> Subject: Birth Certificates of David and Max Amos
>>>>>>> To: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca
>>>>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Assistant (Property): Samantha Williams
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Direct Line: (506) 648-0373
>>>>>>> Email: swilliams@mosherchedore.ca
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>> From: mike gauvin <mikegauvin@live.ca>
>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 15:56:14 +0000
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Hey Kyle read real slow
>>>>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey David, I tried to call Reid, no avail. I will call that Serge
>>>>>>> Gauvin guy Monday morning, this is getting ridiculous. I would just
>>>>>>> prefer to go through the proper legal channels.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yours Truly, Michael Gauvin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Staff Sgt. Al Carroll, former head of Colchester RCMP testifies at mass shooting public inquiry

$
0
0

https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/status/1551387950944079872 

 

 
Hardly anyone at #MCC today! Maybe that’s because they have the same panelists, repeating the same information…..just a different spin on it. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck….. Maybe some real witnesses would be more helpful!
 

Replying to @darrellbcurrie
 
I talked to you before this show began then called in and mentioned you before you called in Correct?
 
youtube.com
the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 24, 2022 - with Paul Palango
Paul Palango and I will discuss the unfolding public inquiry into the Nova Scotia Mass Shootings. Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice ...
11:04 PM · Jul 24, 2022

Top Mountie in area of N.S. mass shooting stayed home to avoid command confusion


 
HALIFAX — The senior RCMP officer in the district where the Nova Scotia mass shooting occurred says he stayed home during the rampage because having a "white shirt" present at the command post would have caused confusion.

In his interview last month with the public inquiry, Archie Thompson, who retired about six months after the April 18-19, 2020, killings, said if he had left his home about 90 kilometres south of the command post and driven to the scene, it would have raised questions about who was running the operation.

At the time, the veteran officer had been superintendent in charge of the RCMP's Northeast Nova district for almost four months, and he wore the white shirt of a commissioned officer.

In his interview released Friday by the inquiry, Thompson outlined difficulties reaching his second-in-command for the district, Staff Sgt. Steve Halliday, on the phone during some of the tension-filled moments as the killer drove a replica police cruiser on April 19 and continued his murders in the Wentworth area.

Twenty-two people, including a pregnant woman, would die before police shot the perpetrator at a gas station in Enfield, N.S.

Thompson said his notes indicated that at 9:52 a.m. on April 19, Halliday sent him a message saying "shots fired," and then was unable to provide a further update as he was busy. Thompson said that more than an hour later, at 10:57 a.m., Halliday sent another message saying, "We have major issues," and telephoned his commander 15 minutes later to relay information about additional deaths.

However, Thompson said being present at the command post where Halliday was assisting Staff Sgt. Jeff West, the critical incident commander, wouldn't have helped.

"I wouldn't want to do that and inject myself into the investigation .... The rank, the colour of the uniform tends to have an impact when I show up," he said.

While the retired superintendent said it was his role to "get the resources moving along if required," he said through the night he heard that the RCMP officers on the scene had sufficient personnel.

Asked by the commission lawyer if he should have been at the scene to determine this, Thompson responded that he didn't believe that would be the normal procedure.

Thompson's interview also indicated that he was among those asked by Halliday the morning of April 19 to look into notifying the public that police had learned the killer was armed and driving a replica RCMP vehicle.

Halliday testified in May that he confirmed the replica vehicle was still unaccounted for at 7:55 a.m. on April 19, and had noted at about 8 a.m. "this has to be communicated out to the (RCMP) members, all municipal agencies, police departments and border crossings and we have to get it out to the public as soon as possible."

Thompson's notes say that at 8:22 a.m., he and Halliday "discussed the need to ensure this information was made public," and six minutes later, he called Chief Supt. Chris Leather, the second-highest ranking officer in the province, to provide "an update" and get a number for Lia Scanlan, the director of strategic operations.

Thompson said he called Scanlan at 8:39 a.m. and informed her about the marked police car, and she agreed she would call a sergeant at the command post. Thompson told the public inquiry lawyer he then left the matter with her, and said it was her department's responsibility.

Halliday testified in May that he was surprised the message about the replica vehicle didn't go out to the public until 10:17 a.m., more than two hours after his notes recorded he wanted this to occur.

Lawyers for family members have criticized the delay, noting that during the extra hours of delay at least six people were killed on April 19.

The inquiry has said that the precise role Leather may have played in the delay is unclear and in a summary it published May 17 said that inquiry staff were still investigating Leather's role in this. He is expected to testify before the inquiry next week.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 22, 2022.

Michael Tutton, The Canadian Press

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/rcmp-24-hour-trial-clarenville-coverage-on-call-1.4542011 

 

Around-the-clock policing left small detachments 'stretched pretty thin': RCMP

24-hour policing experiment ends in Clarenville, Marystown but continues in Grand Falls-Windsor

 

CBC News · Posted: Feb 19, 2018 8:30 PM NT

 

 Superintendent Archie Thompson oversees 17 police detachments for the RCMP in Newfoundland and Labrador. (Mike Rudyk/CBC)

Clarenville has 14 RCMP officers, while the Marystown detachment has 21 and the Grand Falls-Windsor detachment has 27.

You need your days off to recharge your batteries.- Superintendent Archie Thompson

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1B3iJWbScg&t=348s&ab_channel=AdamRodgers

 

MCC Day 28 - S/Sgt. Rehill's Pre-taped Testimony & How Commissioners Might Rebuild Confidence

586 views
May 31, 2022
674 subscribers
Staff Sergeant Brian Rehill testified yesterday, by Zoom, and the video was released this morning. S/Sgt. Rehill had asked for accomodations to allow the testimony to not be broadcast live, and for him to not be cross examined. The MCC Commissioners granted his request, but should be having second thoughts after watching him testify without trouble for over five hours. S/Sgt. Rehill testified about miscommunications on the containment efforts in Portapique, the dynamic of having multiple commanders giving orders over the radio, and distinctions between his evidence and S/Sgt. Halliday's when it came to knowledge of the gunman's replica police car. MCC lawyer Roger Burrill asked the direct questions, and then asked some questions on behalf of the other participants. It is not clear why this procedure was considered less traumatic for the S/Sgt. than having another lawyer ask the same questions, though Burrill's gentle approach and lack of any follow-up may be the answer. In the video, I talk about what I think the Commissioners need to start doing in order to start fostering and establishing some confidence among the participants and the public. It is *not* more pre-written, vaguely phrased remarks about how difficult all this must be for everyone.

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/sgt-andy-o-brien-testimony-public-inquiry-1.6472107

 

Why a senior Mountie who'd been drinking on night of N.S. shootings says he jumped into action

Sgt. Andy O'Brien's testimony was not public and he didn't face direct questions from families' lawyers

O'Brien was off shift on the night of April 18, 2020, and had consumed four to five drinks of rum at home between 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. AT, at which point the first 911 calls came in, he said Tuesday. 

"I have a very strong sense of responsibility for the members that I'm responsible to. I lost a member in 2017 who worked for me. My nightmare that night was I was going to lose another," O'Brien told the inquiry tasked with examining the 13-hour rampage that left 22 people dead, injured others and devastated many in Nova Scotia. 

In the first hour of the police response on April 18, 2020, O'Brien — whose Monday-to-Friday job was overseeing the daily operations of the RCMP in Colchester County — communicated by radio from home with the team of three officers on foot in a subdivision where police would later discover 13 people had been killed. 

O'Brien advised them to "be very, very cautious, do not be aggressive" and not to approach a burning building unless someone was at risk.

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

He testified the RCMP code of conduct prohibits anyone who's been drinking from working and though he felt he didn't violate that, he was aware it could "bring into question the integrity of any decision-making" and hurt the confidence other officers and the public had in him.

Because of the optics, he advised his boss, Staff Sgt. Al Carroll, who went into work as a result. 

O'Brien testified he got his wife to drive him to his detachment to pick up a portable radio. 

"I was not intoxicated, but that's not the point. The point is there's always going to be a perception if people are aware you've been drinking … that you're compromised," he said.

O'Brien is one of two senior RCMP officers who was approved to answer questions in recorded sessions, as opposed to in front of a roomful of participants and lawyers. 

Lawyers representing families could submit questions in advance, but some boycotted proceedings in Truro, N.S., because they were not permitted to directly question O'Brien and Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill, who testified Monday. Neither session was live streamed as has been the case with every other witness, but the commission said it will post the video. 

Anna Mancini, counsel for the Mass Casualty Commission, questions former RCMP sergeant Andy O'Brien on May 31, 2022, as part of the inquiry into the N.S. mass shooting of 2020. (CBC)

Anna Mancini, the lawyer asking questions for the Mass Casualty Commission, pointed out some of O'Brien's directions to front-line officers appeared "at odds or contradictory" with his claim that he would not make decisions about the police response. 

She specifically asked about O'Brien's comment to "hold off" when Const. Chris Grund asked about sending a second team into the subdivision where they knew four children were hiding in a home. 

O'Brien testified he only got on the radio after waiting "what seemed to me to be a lifetime" for someone else to respond, and did so after 15 seconds because he was fearful the officer would take it upon himself to go in.

He also characterized his response to "hold off" as pointing out established RCMP protocol not to send two teams of officers into an area with an active shooter situation as opposed to making an order. 

"It wasn't a decision, it was 'this is our training' ... We don't want anybody else in the crossfire," he said. 

In that instance, O'Brien said the officers in charge — Rehill, Carroll and Staff Sgt. Steve Halliday — were very busy and he felt "compelled" to help as it was "a case of obviously none of them heard the transmission or were in a position to respond to it." 

O'Brien said he did not believe alcohol affected his judgment. 

3 weeks of testimony from commanders 

This is the third week senior officers have testified about the decisions they made and information they processed during the shooting rampage. 

O'Brien, like Carroll and Rehill, said he had no memory of hearing Const. Vicki Colford communicate on the radio that she was hearing about a back way out of Portapique. At the time, the RCMP were trying to seal off the community and only later realized the gunman drove out on a private road along a blueberry field that did not appear to be an exit on maps, they testified.

O'Brien also said he did not remember if Colford brought this up when he spoke to her on the phone about 20 minutes after her radio broadcast. 

Throughout his testimony, O'Brien said he could not remember specific details or conversations, including the person he spoke with in some cases.

For example, O'Brien said he knew he consulted someone by phone before giving Grund and Const. Bill Neil the go-ahead to walk into Portapique to try to rescue the children. 

Rehill was overseeing the response for the first three hours from the RCMP's communications centre. Early on April 19, Staff Sgt. Jeff West took over as critical incident commander and worked with a team at the fire hall in Great Village, N.S. 

On Monday, Rehill testified he called O'Brien around 3 a.m. to relay West's wishes that due to things "getting awfully confusing," he and O'Brien needed to "step back" and let the command team "run the show."

Challenges remembering details

Mancini asked specifically about an exchange that occurred about an hour after that conversation, when West asked O'Brien over radio to stop telling officers stationed around Portapique they could leave checkpoints if other officers were there.

The direction to try to relieve those officers would've come from someone else, O'Brien testified.

"I'm not sure how that evolved. I believe that was instructions given to me by one manager and then a rethink or correction by another manager," he said. 

"It's also possible I misinterpreted the conversation of whoever I was speaking with, I don't know. I have no memory or notes." 

Mancini, as other lawyers for the commission have, asked if there was confusion about who was issuing commands to front-line officers on the radio. 

O'Brien responded by describing an analogy of creating a "beast" of a structure of more than 100 people in a few hours "with a business plan no one has seen before you started the task" to try to stop a threat. 

RCMP vehicles continued to block the crime scene in Portapique, N.S. on April 26, 2020. The morning of April 19, O'Brien was responsible for ensuring an officer was guarding each of the crime scenes that had been discovered. (Olivier Lefebvre/CBC)

He said any time there is a command post, the volume of information being processed is overwhelming.

"It's impossible to create something in that breadth, and in that time span, with that lack of understanding what the challenges are, without having some crossed wires," he said, adding it's difficult to relate the scale and complexity of the response to civilians. 

O'Brien went off shift to sleep for a few hours overnight and reported to the command post the following morning, around the time 911 calls started coming in about new shootings. 

As the tactical team rushed to try to track down the gunman, O'Brien and Carroll drove to Portapique to ensure officers were still watching the crime scenes from the night before. 

Secured scenes in Portapique

It would still be hours before police discovered the full extent of the carnage. Officers did not locate the bodies of five people in two homes on Cobequid Court until much later, and hours after family members called looking for information. 

Had he known there might be more victims, finding them would have been the top priority, O'Brien testified. But he said he never received any information from the RCMP's dispatch centre about people who hadn't been accounted for. 

One officer, Const. Nick Dorrington, previously told the inquiry that O'Brien sent him out to drive around Portapique and look for bodies on lawns. 

When asked about Dorrington's comments, O'Brien said he only recalled trying to offer a break to an officer guarding a gruesome crime scene, and knew the officer would only leave to take a drive if he was given another task.

He said it never occurred to him there could be other scenes. 

"It was such a unique situation. I'd never been to a crime scene that extended past what we were aware of," he said. 

"I wish we had known. I wish we had found them soon. I can't imagine what the families went through." 

'No magic solution'

Mancini asked about suggestions for improving future responses, but O'Brien said there is "no magic solution."

"It's such a multi-legged process that there are going to be gaps. There's lots of things about this incident that I wish had been different," he said. 

"But we can't change those. We did our best. There were parts of this process that I really wish we could've done better, but we did the best with what we had at the time."

 

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/8-hours-find-5-ns-mass-shooting-victims-deficient-lawyer-1.6469143  

 

More than 18 hours to find 5 N.S. mass shooting victims was 'deficient': lawyer

RCMP fell short by failing to order a house-to-house canvassing of the home, says Josh Bryson

A lawyer for families of victims killed in the Nova Scotia mass shooting says an 18-hour delay in finding five bodies of those murdered is a sign of "deficient" policing.

A study released Thursday by the public inquiry into the shooting quotes RCMP supervisor Sgt. Andy O'Brien stating "it did not occur" to him to drive to scenes other than locations where bodies were known to be and where fires had occurred in Portapique, N.S.

The public inquiry has said 13 of 22 victims were killed by the gunman in Portapique between about 10 p.m. and about 10:45 p.m. AT on April 18, 2020, when the killer escaped through a back road in his replica police car.

However, the study says it wasn't until 4:46 p.m. on April 19, 2020, that the bodies of Peter and Joy Bond and — a few minutes later — those of Aaron Tuck, Jolene Oliver and Emily Tuck were found on a small road called Cobequid Court at the southern end of the community.

Josh Bryson, a lawyer for the Bond and Tuck families, said the RCMP fell short by failing to order a house-to-house canvassing of the homes in the small community sooner than they did, adding that police left desperate family members wondering about their loved ones' fates.

"It's deficient, it's not appropriate," Bryson said Friday in an interview. "It's not acceptable to us. You had members on hand .... There were no searches [in the morning].

"They didn't seem to consider that there might have been residents in homes who needed medical attention."

On the morning of April 19, 2020, emergency response team members were gradually evacuating the community. However, after a call came in at 9:30 a.m. of another shooting near Wentworth, N.S., those officers rapidly left Portapique in pursuit of the gunman. The inquiry heard Thursday that district commander Staff Sgt. Al Carroll and Sgt. O'Brien took charge of the Portapique area at this time, with constables under their command. Carroll left mid-morning, leaving O'Brien in charge.

Bryson said Bond family members had reached out to police via 911 seeking information the morning of April 19, but the requests didn't appear to make their way to Carroll.

Carroll testified on Thursday he didn't recall receiving "any messaging" from police dispatchers about these calls. He also said that he didn't expect that the houses would be searched, as it was up to the major crime investigators to take the next steps.

Const. Nick Dorrington told inquiry investigators he was ordered to look for "fatalities on front lawns" on April 19. The study says GPS records indicate his car stopped in front of the Bond house at 10:26 a.m. Dorrington's car was at the residence for about 30 seconds, but he didn't enter the home.

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

Bryson said he's left to wonder why the officer didn't approach the house. "Mr. Bond was in the front door deceased, the screen door was off its hinges, television was on, the lights were on. For someone to sit in the driveway, it's extremely upsetting and concerning," he said.

"There's no evidence to suggest they [the victims] were still alive but it's very distressing to know your loved ones remained in the area with first responders in the vicinity, but they aren't being discovered," the lawyer added.

The theme of failures of communication has been prominent over the past week at the public inquiry hearings.

Carroll testified on Thursday that he didn't learn until 3:30 a.m. on April 19 that there were two key eyewitnesses who saw the killer and his replica patrol car at about 10:15 p.m. the previous night.

Bryson said the RCMP's communications shortcomings have emerged as a key revelation of the inquiry to date.

"A lot of this we can remedy, from my point of view, with better systems to convey information, which would be minimal in cost," he said.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QF0-JLd-Zj8&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells 

 


MCC - DAY 28 - AL CARROLL -COMMAND DECISIONS & CRITICAL ICIDENT RESPONSE

1,139 views
Streamed live on May 26, 2022
3.43K subscribers

 

 


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/al-carroll-testimony-truro-mass-shooting-hearings-1.6466379

 

Former head of Colchester RCMP testifies at mass shooting public inquiry

Staff Sgt. Al Carroll, now retired, was district commander of RCMP in Bible Hill

Staff Sgt. Al Carroll first found out about a situation in Portapique, N.S., when his son, who was also a police officer, called him at home to give him a heads up.

At that time, Const. Jordan Carroll was working in Cumberland County and helped block off part of Highway 2 west of the entrance to the subdivision where the violence started. 

That evening, a gunman attacked neighbours, killing 13 people before driving away in a decommissioned police car he'd designed to look like an actual RCMP cruiser. The following morning Gabriel Wortman killed nine more people: acquaintances and strangers, including a pregnant woman and an RCMP officer. 

The senior Carroll answered questions Thursday via Zoom after the commission overseeing the public inquiry granted an accommodation. In its decision, the commission didn't explain the exact reasons for the him appearing virtually, but said it considers private health information.

The National Police Federation and Canada's attorney general had requested that Carroll appear in person, but said he should only answer questions posed by the inquiry's lawyers. 

The commission decided he will still have to answer questions posed by lawyers for families of the victims, though some are boycotting proceedings in response to the decision that two other senior officers will be allowed to testify in pre-recorded sessions and won't face any cross-examination.

N.S. mass shooting victims’ families boycotting public inquiry

2 months ago
Duration 3:58
Brett Ruskin provides the latest on the public inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass shooting.

Carroll was just shy of 40 years of service with the Mounties that spring and as detachment commander his role was predominantly administrative — overseeing the detachment's staff of 34 officers — but the night of April 18, 2020, he put on his uniform and headed to the office to help. 

In the early hours, Carroll helped with positioning officers in the Portapique area and efforts to close off exits. 

Commission counsel Roger Burrill asked about a radio broadcast at 10:48 p.m. from Const. Vicki Colford where she explained a woman whose husband the gunman had injured told her about a possible back way out of the subdivision. 


She said: "Millbrook, if you guys want to have a look at the map, we're being told there's a road, kind of a road that someone could come out, before here. Ah, if they know the roads well." Only later would police determine the gunman drove out a private road along a blueberry field, likely escaping a few minutes before Colford's broadcast. 

Carroll said the audio played during the public inquiry proceedings was the first time he heard the communication. He said the radio transmission could have occurred when he was on the phone. 

That night he moved to a makeshift command centre set up in Great Village, N.S., and worked closely with fellow staff sergeants Steve Halliday and Addie MacCallum. He worked into the next morning. 

The 'blueberry field road' north of Cobequid Court in Portapique, N.S., looking north toward Brown Loop. This is the road the gunman is believed to have used to leave the subdivision. (Mass Casualty Commission )

Drawing on maps while planning response

During Thursday morning's questions, Burrill also asked about the information Carroll was using while planning how to contain Portapique. Carroll said MacCallum consulted what he believed was Google Earth and they reviewed the topography of Portapique, including the blueberry field to the east of the main entrance.

"It looks like just a big field, just a big open field ... we're not seeing an egress point in that area," he testified. "We looked at what we had to look at. It showed nothing we could determine was an active roadway."

The commanders working out of the fire hall in Great Village, N.S., were consulting maps and had printed versions pinned to the walls. (Mass Casualty Commission)

MacCallum previously told the commission he wasn't satisfied with the view on Google and felt it was out of date, "making roads where there's no roads." But he couldn't log into an RCMP satellite imagery program that night. Carroll said he had not been trained on that program as he planned to retire in May 2020. 

Carroll said they were also relying on staff at the RCMP's Operational Communications Centre, where dispatchers worked and Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill was overseeing the response, because they had access to the RCMP program and could review it to look for egress points. 

He and MacCallum also knew the area well and they took down a large map that had been hung on a wall of the detachment to use as a reference point, Carroll said. 

Questions about command structure

Burrill also asked Carroll about Sgt. Andy O'Brien's role. As a non-commissioned officer in the Bible Hill detachment, O'Brien ran the day-to-day operations of the detachment.

Carroll testified he offered to help the night of April 18, after O'Brien told him he'd had a couple glasses of wine and though he wasn't intoxicated, wouldn't be going to the scene out of concern someone might spell the alcohol on his breath. 

Carroll said he was later surprised to hear O'Brien's voice on the radio since he didn't realize he had a portable one at home, but he didn't have any concerns about O'Brien's ability to function. 

At one point, O'Brien got on the radio and said he didn't want a second team on the ground in Portapique, N.S., to "avoid having anyone else in the crossfire."

"I thought Andy was just helping us out, monitoring and passing on information as need be to the rest of us," Carroll said in response to questions about the command role O'Brien had at that time.

N.S. officers defend firing at bystander in mass shooting

3 months ago
Duration 2:03
An inquiry into the April 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting heard from two RCMP officers who apologized for mistakenly shooting at a man wearing a safety vest outside a fire hall in Onslow, N.S., thinking he was the gunman.

Burrill said O'Brien's comment sounded more like providing directions to the front-line officers, to which Carroll replied that he perceived O'Brien as being concerned about safety and was pointing out danger.

But he did concede "it may have been a breach of command structure."

Carroll also acknowledged he "overstepped" his own role when he responded on the radio to his son's request for backup on a road west of Portapique's main entrance. But he said he would have "jumped in" if any officer was not getting a response on the radio and the fact that the constable was his son "had no relevance."

O'Brien and Rehill are both scheduled to testify next week, but will only be questioned by commission counsel next week in pre-taped video interviews, with the chance for other lawyers to submit questions.

'I should have asked more questions'

Later, lawyers questioned Carroll about his conversation with one of the officers who opened fire at the Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade. Const. Terry Brown called Carroll afterward to say he fired his service weapon.

Carroll testified he thought it was just the one accidental shot and asked if the team could continue searching for the gunman. He later learned that Brown and his partner, Const. Dave Melanson, both shot their carbines in the direction of a civilian outside the hall.

He said he stood by that decision to keep the team on the road given they were looking "for a madman out there shooting people." But he testified had he known what happened at the fire hall, he would have gone there personally to check in right away.  

"It falls on me. I should have asked more questions. I was … just so content that nobody was injured and I didn't ask the questions I should have asked and that falls on me," Carroll said.

Family members protest

As Carroll began testifying virtually, about 20 people gathered to protest outside the Truro hotel where the inquiry was being held.

Family members and friends of the victims, as well as supporters of the families, are upset about the accommodations being made for Carroll and two other key RCMP officers involved in the shooting response.

People gather signs for a protest in Truro outside the inquiry into the N.S. mass shooting of 2020 on May 26, 2022. Victims' families say they are upset with the commission's decision to limit how key RCMP members are testifying. (Haley Ryan/CBC)

"If the officers that were in charge those two days can't get on the stand and defend their decisions that they made, then there's something wrong with this whole process," Charlene Bagley, whose father Tom Bagley was killed in the mass shooting, told reporters.

"If they are not going to allow them to get up and speak the only truth that there is, then why are we taking part in this? Why has $26.5 million dollars been put towards this, for causing more trauma to the public and to the families?"

The group quietly marched on the sidewalk throughout the morning, holding signs that said "the truth hurts" and "don't hide behind the badge" as drivers honked in support.

The commission has said the accommodations are to help people with health or privacy concerns give their best evidence in a "trauma-informed" way.

Charlene Bagley, daughter of one of the victims of the 2020 mass shooting in Nova Scotia, speaks with reporters in Truro outside the inquiry into the shootings on May 26, 2022. (Haley Ryan/CBC)

But Bagley said it feels like the commission is not really thinking of the trauma of the other people involved — just the officers. 

"That's all it seems to be. So their trauma seems to trump everyone else's. Not OK with that."

Some signs also called on Nova Scotia's premier to weigh in, reading "Houston we have a problem." 

Premier Tim Houston told reporters in New Glasgow on Thursday that he listens carefully whenever the victims' families raise issues about the inquiry.

When asked about whether Houston could work with the federal government to ensure these concerns are being met, the premier said that the inquiry is an independent process and "we have to be respectful of that."

However, Houston said he's optimistic the commission is also receiving the message and will take the steps necessary to ease the concerns from families, Nova Scotians and politicians "all equally."

"Hopefully, we can find a way to get this back on track. The inquiry is really important that we get to the answers, so we just need everyone to have the confidence that everyone has the same goal," Houston said.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Elizabeth McMillan is a journalist with CBC in Halifax. Over the past 13 years, she has reported from the edge of the Arctic Ocean to the Atlantic Coast and loves sharing people's stories. Please send tips and feedback to elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca

With files from Michael Gorman

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pQPQqdOY6o&ab_channel=AdamRodgers 

 


MCC Day 25 – Critical Incident Commanders Testify

677 views
May 18, 2022
674 subscribers
We are learning more about the RCMP command structure as the Mass Casualty Commission proceedings continue. Today, two further recently retired staff sergeants testified. Staff Sgts. Jeff West and Kevin Surette testified together as a panel. They were working together in command of the mass casualty response for the bulk of the 13 hours over which it took place. Staff Sgt. West was in charge, with Staff Sgt. Surette in support. No reason was offered by Commission lawyer Roger Burrill in the introduction as to why these two witnesses should testify together, and certainly no compelling reason was obvious. Command decisions and structures within the RCMP are certainly a major focus of the Commission, and so it would have seemed sensible to me that these witnesses would have been examined separately. As it stood, there was a great deal of mutual support offered by each for the answers of the other witness, and this can have the effect of giving artificial credibility to answers that might otherwise leave the listener in doubt. Staff Sgt. West retired in July, 2021, and Staff Sgt. Surette retired in August, 2021. They are the latest in a growing line of RCMP supervisors who have retired since the mass casualty events. Such a mass exodus in the upper ranks of the force certainly fosters suspicion about the felt quality of decisions made at the time, though also may clear the ground, in a sense, for new leadership to take over. The staff sergeants today spoke about getting called into the situation, information they received, setting up the command posts at the Great Village Fire Hall, and then coordinating the response and deployment of resources. Though they are both retired, neither staff sergeant was seemingly prepared to acknowledge any errors made, or recognize the potential for meaningful improvement.
 
 
 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/incident-commanders-feared-roadblocks-would-lead-to-more-deaths-in-n-s-mass-shooting-1.6458449

 

Incident commanders feared roadblocks would lead to more deaths in N.S. mass shooting

Retired staff sergeants testified before the inquiry on Wednesday

Retired staff sergeants Jeff West and Kevin Surette testified Wednesday before the Mass Casualty Commission leading the inquiry into the April 2020 mass shooting, when a gunman killed 22 people in the province.

The pair were asked Wednesday about their thoughts on using roadblocks around 10:20 a.m. on April 19, after the gunman had killed strangers he encountered as well as acquaintances.

Surette said he pushed to not block roads like Highway 102, the main artery through Truro, even though that was one choke point between the northern and southern parts of the province.

He said such a roadblock could easily have generated a line of cars two kilometres long. Given that they knew the gunman was killing "at random," Surette said didn't want to expose anyone to further danger.

"We knew that there was likely going to be a shootout at some point," Surette said Wednesday. 

"We didn't want a shootout to happen in front of a lineup of civilians parked on the 102, probably getting out of their cars and looking around to see what's going on."

He said the "lesser of two evils" was the plan they decided on: placing officers at strategic points along the highways to watch intersections.

Both West and Surette said the 13-hour critical incident that evolved into a manhunt for a mobile shooter was a situation they reacted to based on their decades of experience — but it was not something the RCMP had ever trained them for.

RCMP investigators search for evidence at the location where Const. Heidi Stevenson was killed along the highway in Shubenacadie, N.S. on Thursday, April 23, 2020. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

The scenario that Surette feared — citizens pulling over to ask questions at a shooting scene — happened later that morning around 10:50 a.m. in Shubenacadie, where RCMP Const. Heidi Stevenson was killed by the gunman after a gunfight between the two. Joey Webber, a man who pulled over to try and help as he passed by, was also killed.

Inquiry documents show multiple people in nearby cars saw the gunman's shootout with Stevenson on a highway interchange, drove directly by while he was still there, or were roaming around on foot and approached the RCMP officers that were later guarding the scene.

West and Surette were the two on-call critical incident commanders (CIC) the night the shootings began on April 18. West was reached first by Steve Halliday, a now-retired staff sergeant, who called him at 10:42 p.m. to tell him there was a likely active shooter situation in Portapique.

West let Surette know he was being called in to take charge of the incident and bring in resources like the emergency response team, and arrived at the makeshift command post in Great Village near Portapique after 1 a.m. Surette, who was based in Yarmouth, made his way to Great Village a few hours later to offer West support.

They also addressed gaps in information, including that they weren't aware until eight hours after the fact that a witness to the gunman had been shot but survived.

Key information not passed on from early hours

The inquiry has heard that Portapique residents Andrew and Kate MacDonald were shot at by the gunman from his mock cruiser, but managed to drive away quickly and encountered the first RCMP officers who responded to the community just before 10:30 p.m. on April 18.

The MacDonalds were on the phone with 911 when the shooting happened, and Kate eventually was transferred to risk manager Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill. She told him the gunman was in a police car that had stripes.

Both MacDonalds spoke with officers at the scene, and Kate told Const. Vicki Colford about a back road out of the community that came out near an old church on Highway 2. Colford radioed that information out at 10:48 p.m. 

Police didn't interview Andrew again until after 5 a.m. on the 19th, and West said he finally learned about his information around 6:30 a.m. on April 19 when Halliday told him. 

Halliday testified Tuesday that he also hadn't known about Andrew's existence until around 3:30 a.m. in a debrief with the first team of officers who'd met the MacDonalds in Portapique.

Commissioners ask how to fill gap

West said he never was told about the Colford broadcast about a secondary exit, and couldn't "speculate" on why he wasn't told about Andrew's evidence until hours later.

"It's a bit surprising that you would arrive and take command three hours in without the information about Andrew MacDonald reaching you, and certainly that it doesn't reach you until the following morning," Commissioner Kim Stanton said to West on Wednesday.

"What is the structural gap that would ensure that that kind of information is captured and shared?"

West said he doesn't have a "simple answer," as he wasn't able to read any reports on the drive to Great Village and relied on conversations with Halliday to fill him in. When West got to the command post, he said there was no time to review 911 transcripts or look through earlier radio logs.

West suggested someone in a crime analyst role scanning through the huge volume of information and picking out the vital pieces would have been helpful, rather than "relying on word of mouth." But, he said there are no officers assigned to that role within critical incidents he's aware of.

"Clearly there's a gap there," said Surette.

Issues with helicopter communication

West and Surette talked about issues they had in trying to get through on the police radio channels to share important updates throughout the incident. West said poor radio coverage is a reality across rural parts of the country, and Surette said too many people talking over one another has been a problem he's seen for years.

This technical issue also appeared when Surette said he was trying to direct the provincial Department of Natural Resources that took to the air after 6 a.m. on April 19. Because the chopper didn't have an encrypted police channel, Surette was communicating to the pilot on another channel through a portable radio and there were several times he either couldn't get through or there was a major delay.

While Surette said he was successful in directing the helicopter to Glenholme where the gunman had visited a couple's home, it arrived too late to spot him. At one point, Surette was trying to get the chopper to crime scenes on Plains Road and wasn't aware it had stopped to refuel.

The setup was "not ideal," he said.

Alert not in 'toolbox'

West and Surette said Wednesday they did not consider sending a public emergency alert about the shootings through the province's Emergency Management Office (EMO), which at the time was the only agency with the Alert Ready system in the province.

Surette said he'd gotten an alert about COVID-19 on his cellphone just weeks beforehand, but didn't think the alert capability had reached into policing.

The inquiry heard last week that at the time of the shooting, alerts could be sent to all Nova Scotia cellphones on 4G networks, as well as TV and radio stations. EMO staff made presentations on the alert system to RCMP multiple times in the years before the tragedy, and offered them the ability to send alerts on their own, but that was turned down.

"It was not a tool in our toolbox at that time," West said.

West also said he was not aware of exactly what media releases or public communications were going out about the incident, since he'd delegated that task to Halliday.

The RCMP and Halifax Regional Police can now issue their own alerts.

The inquiry's public hearings will resume next Wednesday.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

 

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/one-of-rcmp-officers-in-command-of-n-s-mass-shooting-testifies-at-inquiry-1.6456206 

 

RCMP officer in charge explains why he dismissed marked car evidence in N.S. shooting

Retired staff sergeant Steve Halliday spoke before the inquiry Tuesday

Steve Halliday, a retired staff sergeant, testified Tuesday at the inquiry examining the shootings that he was able to quickly discount that theory, and instead believed the vehicle connected to the gunman was in fact a decommissioned or old RCMP car.

Halliday is one of a number of officers who have testified at the inquiry that they didn't imagine during the early hours of the rampage that the vehicle being driven by Gabriel Wortman, who killed 22 people on April 18-19, 2020, was nearly identical to a real police cruiser.

He also outlined what he knew of the emergency alert system, and what information led him and other officers to conclude the gunman remained in the community of Portapique, N.S., hours after the shooting began, when in fact he had escaped and would resume killing people the next morning.

A new document released Tuesday by the commission conducting the inquiry details the RCMP command structure and decisions over the 13 hours the gunman was active, and lays out what each officer did and when.

At 10:35 p.m. on April 18, risk manager Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill called Halliday at home to tell him about a likely active shooter situation in Portapique, where multiple people had died, fires were set around the community and a police car was possibly involved.

As the risk manager on duty at the Operational Communications Centre in Bible Hill, N.S., Rehill had been in charge of the unfolding incident from the moment victim Jamie Blair called 911 at 10:01 p.m. She said her husband, Greg, had been shot by Wortman, a neighbour. She also said there had been an "RCMP car" in their yard.

She herself was then shot and killed by the gunman.

Halliday said Tuesday that Rehill told him Dave Lilly, a now-retired RCMP sergeant, had been brought up as being possibly connected since he owned property near Portapique.

"My first thought was 'uh-oh,'" Halliday told the inquiry, adding he was worried Lilly had his marked cruiser with him in Portapique and had done something "heinous" in the community.

"I was really concerned that this could be the case," Halliday said.

According to the inquiry documents, at 10:55 p.m. Halliday called Lilly directly. Lilly was at his cottage, which wasn't in Portapique, and it became clear he wasn't involved in the active shooter situation.

     A photo of the gunman's decommissioned 2017 Ford Taurus that he made into a replica cruiser. (Mass Casualty Commission)

Halliday said once he realized Lilly wasn't involved, the idea of the marked cruiser morphed to a decommissioned or older model of police car. He said from his experience, when people are caught up in traumatic situations their information can be "wrongly worded or misinterpreted."

"That factored into my thought process at that time," Halliday said.

When asked further about this issue by lawyers representing victims' families, Halliday said the idea of  a decommissioned car with some old reflective markings left behind made the most sense. To conclude that someone had created a mock RCMP car, which the gunman actually used, "wasn't realistic to me."

The inquiry has also heard that the first three officers who searched for the gunman in Portapique didn't imagine they were looking for someone in a fully marked police car that looked nearly identical to their own.

Halliday retired in January 2021 after 30 years with the Mounties in various roles. He had been an instructor for courses like immediate action rapid deployment, and had been in "numerous" critical incidents over the years through his work as a crisis negotiator.

He did not have critical incident commander training.

Halliday brings in other officers

After the first call from Rehill, Halliday took over and brought in the rest of the command team. He called Staff Sgt. Jeff West at 10:42 p.m. to bring him in as the critical incident commander and get him to mobilize his team "as quickly as he could."

At that time, he would have passed on the information to West that a marked police car was possibly involved, Halliday said Tuesday. Halliday also called Staff Sgt. Addie MacCallum and told him he'd need him to handle containment and identify a perimeter.

MacCallum and Staff Sgt. Al Carroll were first to arrive at Bible Hill detachment and began to "prepare and muster resources" for the incident, including assessing maps of the Portapique area, constructing a profile of the gunman and helping call out for other resources.

Just after 11:30 p.m., Halliday joined the two other officers at Bible Hill and decided to have Rehill continue controlling resources on the ground as "ad hoc incident commander."

After spending the first few hours at the Bible Hill detachment, Halliday, MacCallum and Carroll moved to the Great Village command post to join West and other officers. Halliday arrived just after 2 a.m.

The 'blueberry field road' north of Cobequid Court in Portapique, looking north toward Brown Loop. (Mass Casualty Commission )

Andrew MacDonald, a Portapique resident who had been shot and injured by the gunman, was interviewed by Const. Jeff MacFarlane around 5 a.m. He told the officer the gunman's car had "coloured" vinyl decals like a police cruiser, and there was "potentially" another way to get out of Portapique through a path that came out near a church on Highway 2. 

MacDonald's account was passed on to Halliday by Cpl. Gerard Rose-Berthiaume about an hour later. According Halliday's notes, Rose-Berthiaume told him the gunman had driven a Ford Taurus back into Portapique after shooting MacDonald near the entrance to the community. There is no mention of MacDonald's description of police decals on the vehicle.

The notes also say Rose-Berthiaume indicated "there was no other way out" of the community. That information later proved wrong, as the gunman likely used an old back road to leave Portapique. When asked about that Tuesday, Halliday said he could only form opinions based on multiple details he knew at the time.

Halliday said by that point of the morning, and after learning early on that Lilly wasn't involved, the marked police car information had long been "dispelled." 

He said police knew about three Ford Taurus cars the gunman owned, all decommissioned police vehicles. Officers believed two were burning in Portapique while a third was in Dartmouth, N.S., which meant all were accounted for.

Police only later realized there was a fourth, which the gunman was driving. It was unregistered and made to look like an RCMP cruiser.

The remains of the gunman's Portapique property and burnt shell of a car, taken in May 2020. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

Halliday said the main impression he took from Rose-Berthiaume was that the gunman "was trapped" in Portapique as long as he was still driving a car — "so that to me was important information, because it enhanced, you know, my belief that the suspect was probably still down in that area."

Other cues that the gunman was still in the area had come in throughout the night from the initial team on the ground as well as the emergency response team, Halliday said. Those included what sounded like gunshots into the early hours of April 19 and flashlights in the woods of both Portapique and the nearby community of Five Houses.

Halliday became emotional when talking about what those first three officers — constables Stuart Beselt, Aaron Patton and Adam Merchant — dealt with on the ground.

He said they were some of the "bravest people" he'd ever met, who risked their lives to help a community in a situation their immediate action rapid deployment training wouldn't have prepared them to address.

That training is based upon finding and stopping an active shooter in a well-lit, clearly defined area, Halliday said, and came out of the 1999 Columbine High School shooting. Portapique was more like a "bush-tracking event," he said, where members on the ground didn't even have night-vision goggles.

"When you have an event like this that no one has ever been faced with before, that there has to be opportunities to look and assess what we can improve on, what we can learn, to provide our members with the best opportunity for success," Halliday said.

Rehill issued first containment directions

The commission has suggested the shooter left Portapique not long after the shootings via a private back road — called blueberry field road by locals — then continued on Brown Loop Road to Highway 2 between 10:41 p.m. and 10:45 p.m.

Between 10:44 to 10:46 p.m., Rehill issued the first directions to set up a containment perimeter beyond the intersection of Portapique Beach Road and Highway 2, including roadblocks in the surrounding area.

However, the inquiry has already heard it wasn't until midnight that officers were stationed on Highway 2 east of Portapique Beach Road. In the first hour and a half of the police response, two containment points were set up further west of Portapique Beach Road. 

A pair of officers moved to Brown Loop, to which the blueberry field road connects, at 5 a.m.

Command believed back road impassable by car

Halliday spoke Tuesday about the containment in those first few hours. He said judging from maps they examined at the Bible Hill detachment and Carroll's "local knowledge," there was only one way in or out of Portapique by car — the main entrance of Portapique Beach Road.

"I was satisfied that based on the information I had at that time that our containment was set up in such a manner that anybody who was escaping, you know, in a vehicle, would be intercepted," Halliday said.

However, once he had access to better satellite maps at the command post in Great Village, Halliday said around 4:30 a.m. he noticed a line along the blueberry field that seemed to connect to Brown Loop Road.

Halliday recalled he brought this up to Carroll and MacCallum as a possible exit route. All three agreed "no one could get out there in a car," although perhaps it could be travelled on by foot or in an ATV.

Just to "err on the side of caution," Halliday said they decided to move up the roadblock of two members further east up to the Brown Loop Road.

"To be safe rather than sorry … let's move somebody up," Halliday told the inquiry.

Halliday not told of Colford broadcast

Sandra McCulloch of Patterson Law, whose firm represents many victims' families, asked Halliday about whether he'd heard a broadcast about a possible side road around 10:48 p.m. from Const. Vicki Colford, who'd just interviewed Kate MacDonald.

"We're being told there's a road, kind of a road that someone could come out, before here," Colford radioed.

Halliday said he was still making calls at home and not on the radio by that point, and said no one ever relayed that information to him at the time.

When McCulloch asked whether this detail would have impacted how he assessed the maps of Portapique he was looking at while at the Bible Hill detachment, Halliday said "certainly any information would have come under consideration."

The inquiry has already heard that MacCallum had issues trying to bring up the force's Pictometry program, which is based on satellite imaging, in the first hour of the mass shooting so the officers in Bible Hill turned to Google Maps standard view and paper maps.

McCulloch pointed to an inquiry report showing a view of Portapique with the Pictometry system, which Halliday said looked quite similar to the satellite mapping he looked at hours later. When asked if this would have been helpful to have in the first hours when containment was set up, Halliday agreed.

Alert not in 'playbook'

The inquiry documents show that Halliday spoke with a staff member at the provincial Emergency Management Office just after 6 a.m. about setting up the Onslow fire hall as a comfort centre for Portapique evacuees.

Halliday said Tuesday that he didn't discuss the possibility of sending an emergency alert through EMO, which at that time was the only agency with the Alert Ready system in the province.

The inquiry heard last week that at the time of the shooting, alerts could be sent to all Nova Scotia cell phones on 4G networks, as well as TV and radio stations. EMO staff made presentations on the alert system to RCMP multiple times in the years before the tragedy, and offered them the ability to send alerts on their own, but that was turned down.

Halliday said Tuesday he was "unfamiliar" with the alert system being used for policing in the province.

"It simply wasn't in our playbook," he said.

The RCMP and Halifax Regional Police can now issue their own alerts.

Roadblocks brought up

The inquiry also heard about Halliday's radio broadcast just before 11 a.m. on April 19, directing another member to look at closing Highway 2 southbound. This would have come right after Const. Heidi Stevenson was shot and killed by the gunman after he crashed his cruiser into hers in Shubenacadie.

Before that, Halliday said there had been some discussions around roadblocks or whether they should create checkpoints strategically along certain areas.

However, he said the decision was made not to do this as it "posed increased risk to the public" by creating a bigger target for the gunman where people were stuck sitting in a line of cars.

After Stevenson was shot and the net was "tightening down" on the gunman's location, Halliday said roadblocks seemed appropriate because they finally knew where he was within a smaller area.

Tara Miller, who represents relatives of victims Aaron Tuck and Kristen Beaton, asked Halliday about why exactly more roadblocks weren't set up in the Truro area on April 19 to prevent the gunman moving from the northern part of Nova Scotia to the south.

She noted by the time police knew the gunman was active again around 9:30 a.m. on April 19, when the call came in about victim Lillian Campbell in Wentworth, the gunman's partner Lisa Banfield had told police she was worried he would head to her sister's home in Dartmouth to hurt her.

Halliday said within a short time after Campbell's death, the gunman knocked on the door of a couple's home in nearby Glenholme and multiple RCMP officers as well as the emergency response team surrounded that area.

"It was my belief that individual was going to be dealt with at that home," Halliday said, so that was the focus.

But Miller suggested it is the job of police to look at the "global picture," and keep in mind all information about where the gunman might head next — to which Halliday agreed.

Two more RCMP commanding officers involved in the mass shooting response will testify before the inquiry on Wednesday.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/vicki-colford-portapique-response-mass-shooting-1.6492861

 

Mountie who warned of back way out of Portapique doesn't remember saying it

Const. Vicki Colford, now retired, says she was focused on helping woman in shock

Const. Vicki Colford, who has since retired, answered questions in a sworn affidavit entered as a Mass Casualty Commission exhibit earlier this month. Her statement is shedding light on how police missed a key piece of information about a possible escape route the gunman is believed to have used to evade police stationed less than a kilometre away.

On April 18, 2020, Colford was the fourth RCMP officer to arrive the night a gunman killed 13 neighbours and torched several homes. Family members of people killed the following morning have questioned why police did not do more to seal off the community and why it took so long to realize the gunman could have driven out on a private road bordering a blueberry field.

The public inquiry examining the tragedy went over surveillance footage, spoke to witnesses and determined the gunman most likely drove along the field and out onto Highway 2 a few hundred metres from the main entrance between 10:41 p.m. and 10:45 p.m. AT.


By the time Colford pulled up around 10:32 p.m., two officers had gone into the community on foot. After learning a third would join them, she decided to check vehicles at the entrance and ensure Andrew and Katie MacDonald, who had been shot at, got medical attention.

At 10:48 p.m., Colford said on her police radio: "If you guys want to have a look at the map, we're being told there's a road, kind of a road that someone could come out, before here. Ah, if they know the roads well."

But at least three senior officers overseeing the response testified they never heard her transmission and Colford herself said she didn't realize she made it.

'No recollection' of radio transmission

It wasn't until reviewing inquiry documents that she learned of it and had "no recollection" of being told about a back exit or if the woman she spoke with identified the road connected to it, Colford wrote in an affidavit.

The MacDonalds left in separate ambulances and Colford stayed with Katie MacDonald for about 45 minutes.

"Katie MacDonald was very upset and not speaking clearly. I was trying to keep her calm while monitoring our surroundings for the threat," she said.

   An aerial map of Portapique from May 2020 with street names added by the Mass Casualty Commission. (Mass Casualty Commission)

Her focus was on "trying to keep my head on a swivel to watch and be aware" amid the nearby fires, shots fired and the active shooter on the loose, Colford stated.

She said her assumption — based on reading the transcript — was that she made the broadcast to pass new information to the risk manager overseeing the response and anyone else that was part of it.

She said most of her communications that night happened over the radio, but she did also speak with senior officers by phone.

Worried about ambush, screening vehicles

Another Portapique resident, Harlan Rushton, told the commission he spoke to a female Mountie on his way out, telling her something along the lines of, "You know there's another way out," and the officer agreed.

Colford told the commission she didn't have any memory of that exchange but checked about 10 vehicles looking for signs of the gunman, weapons, gas cans and anything suspicious.

   An RCMP officer talks with a local resident before escorting them home at a roadblock in Portapique on April 22, 2020. The night of April 18, Const. Vicki Colford was stationed at the entrance to Portapique Beach Road. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

Her goal, she explained, was to get people out quickly so the exchanges only lasted a few seconds. She said she scanned the back of trucks and hatchbacks and got at least one driver to pop their trunk.

"I had no idea where the perpetrator was… The possibility of ambush was always on my mind," she wrote.

"Every time a vehicle was leaving, it diverted my attention from my surroundings and I didn't want anyone to get shot at while stopped."

Not required to testify 

Lawyers representing families of victims had requested that Colford appear as a witness and though the commissioners initially said they would subpoena her, they later granted Colford an accommodation that she could provide a written statement instead of oral testimony.

The National Police Federation had made the request and submitted confidential personal information that the commissioners considered.

Lawyers representing participants were able to submit the questions they had for Colford, including requests to clarify statements she previously made to the RCMP during an interview a few days after the shootings. She answered 63 questions posed by the commission.

Felt like 'sitting duck'

Colford and Cpl. Natasha Jamieson spent most of the night stationed near the mailboxes at the top of Portapique Road. While positioned around a colleague's SUV, they tried to provide each other with cover — Colford with a shotgun and Jamieson with her service pistol.

Neither officer had completed carbine training.

"I really felt very much like a sitting duck in that I couldn't see much beyond my immediate area due to lack of street lights," Colford told the commission.

Colford had previously provided back up to a colleague — Const. Nick Dorrington — who pulled the gunman over for speeding in February 2020 but had no other prior interactions with him and didn't know the community that well.

Dorrington is scheduled to testify at the inquiry on Monday.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Elizabeth McMillan is a journalist with CBC in Halifax. Over the past 13 years, she has reported from the edge of the Arctic Ocean to the Atlantic Coast and loves sharing people's stories. Please send tips and feedback to elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/constable-nick-dorrington-testimony-mass-shooting-1.6494902

 

Mountie says gunman looked 'infuriated' when pulled over months before N.S. shootings

Officer with military background criticizes response to rampage, says he should've been sent to pursue killer

An RCMP constable testified Monday that in February 2020 he swore at Gabriel Wortman to get back in his vehicle after pulling him over for speeding and the 51-year-old immediately presented as a "clear threat" by walking back toward the cruiser in Portapique, N.S. 

"The way he approached was very direct, purposeful. He looked infuriated, I had no idea as to who this individual was and why he'd be conducting himself in such a manner," Const. Nick Dorrington told a public inquiry examining the shooting and arson rampage that injured some and left 22 people dead, including a pregnant woman and an RCMP officer.

The exchange "de-escalated quickly," however, once Wortman was back in his vehicle and they had a brief conversation, Dorrington testified.

"He proceeded to tell me that he felt that he was being targeted," and became compliant after Dorrington explained that the stop was in no way prompted by an earlier altercation Wortman had with Halifax Regional Police over a parking dispute, the officer said. 

The gunman then brought up his affection for Ford Tauruses, that he had a number of them and collected police paraphernalia, but Dorrington said the minute-long conversation did not prompt him to have any concerns about public safety. 

Dorrington, who spent 17 years in the army before joining the RCMP in 2015, was stationed in Colchester County and was one of the officers who responded to the mass shooting overnight on April 18 and into April 19. That weekend he was on call after working a day shift. 

During Monday's testimony, he was critical of one of his RCMP supervisor's role in the response and said he didn't agree with the decision to only send one team into the section of Portapique where people were killed. He also felt he should have been deployed to chase down the gunman the following morning. 

Const. Nick Dorrington said he took a photo of the gunman's drivers licence and his speed radar as evidence in the event the driver contested a ticket in court. (CBC Photo Illustration)

After learning he'd pulled over the suspect a few months previously, Dorrington shared photos he took of the gunman's licence and the back of the decommissioned Ford Taurus he'd been driving. 

He said the vehicle he'd stopped had faded reflective strips from its time as an RCMP car and that it had a small Canadian flag on the rear by the trunk. 

But, similarly to what several other Mounties have previously told the Mass Casualty Commission, while envisioning what the suspect was driving, he was never picturing a fully marked cruiser like the one the gunman put together and drove during the rampage. 

Frustrated with positioning

Between midnight and 5 a.m., Dorrington and another officer were stationed on Highway 2 screening vehicles four kilometres east of crime scenes in Portapique.

Dorrington testified he "had a challenge" with Sgt. Andy O'Brien's direction to set up there because he felt it was "in contradiction" to his training related to tracking down active shooters.

The public inquiry previously heard that the senior officers overseeing the response were concerned about the possibility of sending more than one team into the "hot zone" where the shooter was last seen due to the possible safety risk of officers being involved in crossfire or a "blue-on-blue" situation where they mistook each other for the suspect. 

The commanders did not have GPS coordinates for general duty constables on the ground. 

But Dorrington said that night he felt the approach should have been to use "as many teams as are necessary to move in locate and neutralize the threat" and agreed with commission counsel Roger Burrill's suggestion that it caused him frustration. 

Issues with supervisor's role

During a behind-the-scenes interview with commission staff, Dorrington was critical of O'Brien's involvement, given that he wasn't on duty and was speaking on the radio from his home.

On Monday, he said that while he has since walked back criticism related to O'Brien's training, he maintained that his involvement made it challenging to know who was in charge. 

"To be receiving direction from Sgt. O'Brien, although I'm sure well intentioned, was creating … additional airtime on the radio, which is problematic. And it created, in my mind, confusion for the chain of command," Dorrington said.

O'Brien and Dorrington worked closely together on Sunday in Portapique. Both remained in the community keeping an eye on the crime scenes. 

Once calls started coming in about new shootings in the Wentworth area, Dorrington said he was "not allowed" to leave to help with the manhunt, despite making his case to O'Brien.

"I felt that given my skill set with previous military training in active theatre [along] with RCMP training, coupled with the fact that I had an unmarked vehicle, that I'd be perhaps the best positioned to leave my current location," he said. 

At one point, Commissioner Leanne Fitch asked Dorrington if he had ever taken or instructed courses in overseeing a critical incident response. He said he had not. 

Dorrington said he was a sergeant in the military so had similar duties to O'Brien's and was in charge of a unit in that capacity. 

Passing along sighting of gunman Sunday morning

While in Portapique on April 19, Dorrington advised his wife to shelter in their basement. He said information gathered from the gunman's spouse, Lisa Banfield, suggested he had a hit list and he was worried that he could be viewed as a target given he was the last Mountie to interact with the gunman.

The officers who interviewed Banfield in the back of an ambulance previously testified at the inquiry and said that while she told them her sister in Dartmouth could be at risk, they did not describe a hit list. 

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

After learning of the situation, Dorrington's wife called a friend who happened to notice a marked RCMP cruiser driving south toward the Halifax area on a secondary highway. Dorrington tried to figure out if an actual cruiser was in the area and then radioed to his colleagues after the possible sighting. 

There was a lot of radio chatter at the time and Dorrington testified he felt there "was a significant delay" in the distribution of his message, which he felt was "pertinent and of high priority." 

Felt equipment was insufficient 

Equipment and training was another area with which Dorrington took issue. 

He said given that the RCMP predominantly polices rural parts of Canada, more active shooter training should be done outside with more of it focused on night-time scenarios. 

Night vision goggles or hand-held devices to identify heat sources would also be helpful, he said, so that general duty officers wouldn't have to wait for specialized resources like the emergency response team during a crisis. 

Lawyer Sandra McCulloch, who represents many family members of people who were killed, asked Dorrington about comments he'd previously made to the inquiry about having had requests related to officer safety denied by a detachment commander prior to April 2020. 

Those requests included a chair to restrain people who could be a physical risk to themselves or others at the detachment, Dorrington said. 

He also requested rotatable spotlights for vehicles that he said would help illuminate long driveways and alleys better than the fixed lights on the lightbars on cruisers that only move when a vehicle does. 

A request for push bars on patrol vehicles — which he said would be cheaper than repairing damage to vehicles — was denied about a week before two of the detachment's cruisers were written off after one backed into another, he said.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/emergency-response-team-tim-mills-trent-milton-testimony-1.6454106

 

Retired tactical officer calls RCMP 'broken organization' at N.S. mass shooting inquiry

Cpl. Tim Mills, now retired, and Cpl. Trent Milton were part of emergency response team

Retired tactical officer details frustration with RCMP in N.S. shooting inquiry

2 months ago
Duration 2:01
A public inquiry into the Nova Scotia mass shooting heard from a retired officer who led the tactical response, and was critical of the RCMP for not having enough staff, proper technology or mental health support to deal with the incident and its aftermath.

 Two RCMP tactical officers testifying Monday at the inquiry examining the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting say responding was made more challenging by not having an adequately staffed team, overnight air support or the technology to pinpoint their locations.

Emergency Response Team leader Cpl. Tim Mills, who decided to retire six months after the shootings, and Cpl. Trent Milton, who took over team leader responsibilities, answered questions together in a witness panel.

In his testimony, as in his behind-the-scenes interview, Mills said he was proud of his team's efforts but didn't hold back criticism of his former employer, calling it a "broken organization."

"The RCMP as an organization wants to give this impression they care about their members.... Commissioner Brenda Lucki has said herself, 'We'll do whatever we can. We can't do enough.' The way we were treated after this is disgusting, absolutely disgusting — it's why I left the RCMP," he said Monday morning.

He said senior management failed to support tactical officers in the weeks after the mass shooting by turning down a request for time to debrief together.

Commission counsel Roger Burrill, right, questions retired RCMP Cpl. Tim Mills, left, and Cpl. Trent Milton as they testified at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry Monday about emergency response team actions. (Andrew Vaughan/Canadian Press)

Mills said he proposed having the team work on administrative tasks at headquarters for two weeks in hopes it would help them process together the trauma they experienced.

But despite initial support from psychologists who met with the team, he said the eight part-time members of the group were told to return to their regular front-line duties in their home detachments or take sick leave.

"There are members off today because of Portapique, not working, that didn't see what we [saw]," said Mills. [They] didn't experience what we experienced. We were at multiple sites, multiple casualties and they forced our guys back to work, our part-timers back to work, a week and a half after."

Wanted to keep busy, together

Milton, who is still working, was more measured, but testified the recommendation to debrief together was consistent with what he'd learned at a SWAT team leadership course.

He said the instructor shared best practices for mental health support developed after other mass shootings, like the 1999 Columbine High School massacre in the U.S., where high numbers of first responders left their positions afterward.

They were told that teams should "keep busy, you need to keep together and be with like-minded individuals. And that's all we were asking for at that point in time," Milton said. 

In his interview with commission investigators, Milton said the weeks after the mass shooting were difficult because of the refusal to allow part-time members to take two weeks away from front-line duties. 

"It was kind of a huge jab … you're telling me I now need to go home and sit in my basement by myself and try to cope with this by myself," Milton told the inquiry in his interview. He remained at work but others took leave.

Cpl. Tim Mills, far left, had 20 years experience on the Nova Scotia RCMP's Emergency Response Team when he led the tactical unit responding to the April 2020 mass shooting. Cpl. Trent Milton is second from left. Days later, they stood at attention as the body of their colleague, Const. Heidi Stevenson, who was among the 22 people killed, passed by. (CBC)

While some senior officers were supportive, Milton said there were "huge gaps" that "went beyond disrespect" and reflected "ignorance" of what they were going through.

He said, for example, the division's commanding officer, now-retired Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman, never met directly with ERT after the mass shooting. He said Chief Supt. Chris Leather, who ultimately came to oversee the tactical team, didn't show up for a meeting to discuss mental health strategies.

"The RCMP is very good at talking the talk and putting out that we've got all these mental health strategies in place, but the action implementation is…is severely lacking," Milton told commission investigators.

Previous requests for larger ERT denied

In April 2020, the tactical team had five full-time members and eight part-time officers who assisted with high-risk situations across Nova Scotia, often barricaded people and calls that involved weapons. After learning of an active shooter in Portapique around 10:45 p.m. AT on April 18, Mills alerted everyone and they assembled at the RCMP's Dartmouth headquarters and rushed to Colchester County.

The inquiry determined they arrived at the scene between 12:35 a.m. and 1:15 a.m. ERT took over the lead on the ground from the general duty officers who were first on the scene.

Both Mills and Milton testified the team was five members short of what had previously been recommended and typically only eight members were on call. 

All 13 members responded on April 18, 2020, but Mills said that wasn't unusual. He said despite not approving multiple proposals to expand the unit, management was "getting their cake and eating it too" because his team was keen to help.

"Most of the time you were getting more than eight guys. Even the guys that weren't on call, were answering that call, because that's what we love to do," he testified. 

Milton said since the mass shooting, ERT has grown to 12 full-time members and there is a proposal with the Department of Justice to add six more full-timers in the next three years. He said they now require a minimum of 12 members to respond to a call. 

Drew on Moncton experience

The commission's report released Monday summarized the team's actions in Portapique, Glenholme, Debert, Shubenacadie and Enfield.

Milton and Mills said what they faced was unlike any specific scenario they'd encountered in training and it drew on many of their skills.

But many ERT officers had responded to the 2014 Moncton shooting, in which a gunman shot five Mounties, killing three and injuring two others. Mills said being there and living through that experience was "good exposure and gave us a very good idea of how to deal with something like that."

Members of the RCMP's emergency response team travelled in a tactical armoured vehicle, as well as trucks and Suburbans during the mass shooting response. Police block the highway in Debert, N.S., on Sunday, April 19, 2020. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

The tactical team spent the early-morning hours following up on possible sightings of the gunman, including nearly two hours — between 1:20 a.m. and 2:20 a.m. and then again from 3:25 a.m. to 4 a.m. — spent clearing properties slightly west of the subdivision where the gunman had killed 13 neighbours.

They also picked up Clinton Ellison, a man who had been hiding in the woods for hours after discovering his brother Corrie's body, checked for vital signs on victims and surveyed the gunman's burning properties.

For more than three hours, starting at 12:45 a.m., the Mounties were communicating on an unencrypted radio channel, which meant anyone with a scanner could have tuned in to hear the transmissions between the officers on the ground, their commanders and the dispatch centre. The commission found using this public channel was an error but it didn't explain why exactly it happened. 

No ability to track locations on phones

During those overnight hours, they had to rely on dispatchers to verbally explain directions over the radio. 

Mills and Milton testified they previously had access to an app that allowed them to see team members' locations on a map of the area. But the app expired and replacement devices they were using needed upgrades and had been sent to Ottawa six weeks previously.

RCMP Cpl. Trent Milton testifies about emergency response team actions on May 16, 2022. (Andrew Vaughan/Canadian Press)

Mills said listening back to recorded communications illustrates the "total confusion" that resulted in attempts to convey locations verbally. 

"It was totally pitch black that night, poorly marked roads, rural area, trying to figure out where to go that night without that ability was frustrating and tough to do," Mills told the inquiry. 

They agreed having the app wouldn't have changed the outcome but they thought it would've allowed them to complete tasks faster.

'Still fighting' for GPS software

Milton said one of the recommendations that came from the independent review into the Moncton shootings was for GPS tools. Through pilot projects, he said they'd come to rely on the apps "quite heavily" and they "were basically blind as far as situational awareness" without them.

Since the 2020 mass shooting, Milton said all RCMP tactical officers in Canada are using new software and he said a year ago he was told it would also be available to all general duty members, but that has yet to happen.

"It's still taken longer than it needs to. We're now eight years post-Moncton and a very simple software app that would provide much better situational awareness at all levels, we're still fighting to get it where it needs to be," he testified. 

     A RCMP dog handler and a member of ERT shot and killed the gunman at a gas station in Enfield, N.S. Other tactical officers arrived to provide backup. (Tim Krochak/The Canadian Press)

Overnight, the RCMP didn't have access to any air support, something Mills testified "would've helped a lot." The only helicopter for the Atlantic region was down for maintenance, something Mills and Milton said wasn't unusual.

The inquiry found the Department of National Defence declined to provide one of their helicopters for an active shooter situation and a provincial one couldn't fly until dawn.

Air support not available 24/7

Milton said the RCMP "certainly have issues surrounding air support" and that people still expect a response around the clock, despite there not being any contingency plans for backups.

In April of 2020, Milton was a drone operator and the only one on scene. Though his equipment could be used at night, he said the priority was helping focus on other tasks. The equipment took time to get in the air and the view was limited that night because of the low cloud cover, thick trees and because they couldn't let the drone out of their sight, he testified.

Around 6:15 a.m., Milton launched the drone from Orchard Beach Drive, near the gunman's garage and where police found the bodies of two people. He said in the 15 minutes it was in the air, he could see the heat signatures of some animals but no humans.

In the past two years, he said the Mounties have added smaller drones to their fleet that are also have thermal imaging and take less time to use.


When a provincial Lands and Forestry helicopter finally was available, ERT moved ahead with plans to start evacuating homes. Mills testified he wanted that aerial view to guard against any potential ambushes in the "hot zone" around the gunman's last known location given they didn't know if he was hiding in the woods.

They didn't get far though before a 911 call came in after a shooting about 40 kilometres away in Wentworth, N.S.

When they left the community, they were not aware five people were dead in their homes on Cobequid Court. They said they told the officers in charge the address they'd gone to and shifted to trying to stop the threat.

They spent the next two hours frantically trying to track down the gunman, who by then was travelling between rural communities driving a replica RCMP cruiser killing strangers.

By the time a dog handler and a tactical officer shot and killed Gabriel Wortman at a gas station in Enfield, N.S., 22 people, including a pregnant woman, a teenager and an RCMP officer, had been murdered. Others were injured and several homes destroyed by fire in the 13-hour rampage. 

WATCH | Former tactical leader says management's treatment pushed him to leave RCMP 

Former tactical leader says management’s treatment pushed him to leave RCMP

2 months ago
Duration 3:45
Two RCMP tactical officers testifying at the inquiry examining the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting say the response was made more challenging by not having an adequately staffed team, overnight air support or the technology to pinpoint locations.
 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/family-nova-scotia-shootings-1.5814403 

 

RCMP took 19 hours to find parents, daughter killed in Nova Scotia mass shooting in April

Family struggling to understand why it took police so long to make discovery

Tammy Oliver-McCurdie lost her younger sister, Jolene Oliver, in last April's mass shooting in Portapique, N.S., and her worst fear remains that the 39-year-old woman, her husband, Aaron Tuck, 45, and their 17-year-old daughter, Emily, lay injured for hours.

The family of three were among the 13 people killed on April 18 in their tiny subdivision in rural Nova Scotia, about 130 kilometres north of Halifax. A gunman went on to kill nine more people the following morning in what became one of the worst mass killings in Canadian history.

A police officer shot and killed the man responsible at a gas station in Enfield, N.S., on Sunday, April 19 at 11:26 a.m., after the gunman travelled about 195 kilometres.

During a teleconference on July 3 with the Oliver family, who live in Alberta, the RCMP said they didn't discover the couple and their daughter until 5 p.m. on April 19 — 19 hours after investigators believe they were killed.

By that point, family members had been frantically calling and looking for information for hours, pleading with the RCMP to send an officer to check on their loved ones.

Police assured the Oliver family they did not suffer, though the final reports from the Nova Scotia medical examiner about how exactly they died are still not complete.


"Always what goes through your mind is how long did they lay there for alive?" Oliver-McCurdie said in an interview with CBC News. "The best story is yes, they went fast. But what if they didn't?"

CBC's The Fifth Estate investigated and found that while the RCMP did tell some residents to leave their homes late on April 18, they left others in the community to sleep through the night, unaware a neighbour had gone on a shooting spree.

Families have questions about delays

The Oliver family is among several that lost loved ones in the rampage who have raised questions about how the RCMP responded and why it took so long to confirm the deaths.

Oliver-McCurdie said she still doesn't understand the delay, given that the subdivision is small and police arrived Saturday night. The Oliver-Tuck home was located about two kilometres from the entrance to the community.

"I would hope that police would check the house to see if everyone was OK, especially if they're missing the shooter. So a lot of questions and a lot of anger coming out of that piece for me and my family," she said.

"I'm upset over it. It makes no sense when it comes to a public safety standpoint, it makes no sense."

At the July 3 meeting, RCMP investigators said officers in Portapique were still in the process of clearing homes on the Sunday afternoon, which is why it took so long to get to Oliver and Tuck's house. They also said at the meeting that on the day after the shooting, they were concerned about properly identifying victims and not releasing incorrect information.

As far as the Oliver family knows, no one in the house called 911. 

WATCH | Thirteen Deadly Hours: The Nova Scotia Shooting:

 

The Fifth Estate presents a comprehensive inquiry into this year's mass shooting in Nova Scotia, chronicling 13 hours of mayhem that constitute one of Canada's deadliest events. [Correction: In the video, we incorrectly said officers jumped out of a cruiser outside the Onslow fire hall and began firing. In fact, the person who was interviewed said it was not a cruiser and she believed it was a Hyundai. Nova Scotia's Serious Incident Response Team has since found that it was an unmarked police vehicle.]

The Oliver family, calling from Red Deer, Alta., on the Sunday, became frantic after Jolene didn't pick up her mother's daily phone call while they have their morning coffee. Aaron and Emily Tuck also didn't respond to calls, texts or Facebook messages.

Before noon Nova Scotia time, the family had heard there was a situation in Portapique and had begun calling the RCMP and hospitals. Twelve hours later — five hours after police say they discovered the family — an RCMP officer finally contacted them to pass on the horrific news.

Oliver-McCurdie said that by then, she, her other sister and parents assumed the worst but had still wondered if somehow the family of three had managed to escape.

"It's one thing to find out that your family is dead and have the confirmation, and it's another excruciating piece to wait in limbo for confirmation," she said.

"You have all these officers, you're supposed to have all these resources. There's no reason why someone couldn't have just driven down there [and checked the house].... After a dozen or more phone calls my family made during the day, it doesn't make sense."

By Sunday night, the police were dealing with 16 crime scenes in several communities. Investigators told the Oliver family that the medical examiner couldn't move the bodies from the home until Tuesday afternoon — a further delay that Oliver-McCurdie said caused them grief and anxiety.

Mass shooting subject of public inquiry

The RCMP declined to answer any questions from CBC News about the case, citing an ongoing public inquiry into the mass shooting called by the provincial and federal governments.

"The RCMP recognizes the need to provide the factual account of what transpired this past April. With the public inquiry now ongoing, the most appropriate and unbiased opportunity to do so is with our full participation in the inquiry," Cpl. Lisa Croteau said in an emailed statement.

The inquiry's final report isn't expected for two more years.

Emily Tuck and Jolene Oliver. The family would often go on outdoor adventures together in Nova Scotia. (Submitted by Tammy Oliver-McCurdie)

In the meantime, Oliver-McCurdie said, her family decided to speak out about the details of the deaths of her sister, brother-in-law and niece — and the questions that remain — to promote discussion about how policing in rural areas could be improved and how April's tragedy might have been prevented.

She said she would also like police forces to tighten the rules and limit access to their own logos and equipment. The shooter — Gabriel Wortman, 51, a denturist with a clinic in Dartmouth — purchased decommissioned police cars and gear online and used them to masquerade as a Mountie. Information on the specifications for the graphics on RCMP cruisers remains publicly available.

"If a positive piece is better public policy, better safety, for those living in Canada ... that makes their deaths ... a little bit easier if we can do better as a society and do better with protecting people in Canada. That needs to be the aim," Oliver-McCurdie said.

'They did everything, just the three of them'

Jolene Oliver, who grew up in Alberta, moved east with her husband and daughter seven years ago to be closer to Tuck's parents. But she left behind a miniature Christmas village she loved, and Oliver-McCurdie said she has been trying to find a way to display her sister's collection.

Oliver worked as a restaurant server because she loved interacting with people — being there to listen to them, support them and make sure they got home safely, her sister said.

Emily Tuck enjoyed working in the garage with her father, Aaron. (Submitted by Tammy Oliver-McCurdie)

"She made the best of everything she ever had. A really unique outlook on life, a very positive outlook on life."

In Portapique, Oliver-McCurdie said, Jolene loved walking along the shore of Cobequid Bay and would insist on taking a proper picnic basket for the family's snacks.

"They did everything, just the three of them," she said.

The family moved into a home that didn't have electricity, and they spent months working on it together. When they needed a washing machine, Aaron Tuck was industrious enough to find a solution, Oliver-McCurdie said.

"He just had that knack, that creative art with welding and wood and things and just understanding them. He had a very great mechanical mind that he could come up with an invention for almost anything," she said.

Emily Tuck spent time in the garage with her father, learning about motors and welding. Like Aaron, Emily also had a creative side and loved playing her fiddle.

WATCH | Emily Tuck plays the violin:

A final song: Emily Tuck plays the violin

Duration 2:22
Emily Tuck, 17, was one of the victims of a deadly shooting rampage in N.S. She and her parents were found dead in their Portapique home. This is the final video posted of her online.

"She made a lot of art and a wrote a lot of poems," Oliver-McCurdie said. "She's a really unique kid and a really unique outlook. She was a lot of fun."

For now, as the Oliver family wait for answers, they continue to grieve. In Alberta, they planted three oak trees from Nova Scotia's Colchester County in memory of the branch of their family they've lost.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Elizabeth McMillan is a journalist with CBC in Halifax. Over the past 13 years, she has reported from the edge of the Arctic Ocean to the Atlantic Coast and loves sharing people's stories. Please send tips and feedback to elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/shooting-victims-portapique-nova-scotia-alberta-1.5538557

 

'They died together': Family of 3 killed in Nova Scotia shooting rampage remembered

'No matter how hard it was, they always stayed together. They always focused on family'

Visitors were rare. The doors were never locked.

The tree-lined property was often filled with the lively hum of their teenage daughter Emily playing the violin. 

For Oliver, who grew up in Calgary, living off the grid was a new adventure. For Tuck, the quaint house and the hard work that came with it had always been home. 

His father had built it to be sturdy and self-sufficient, and they worked hard to maintain his legacy. 

In an interview with CBC News on Monday, Jolene Oliver's sister, Tammy Oliver-McCurdie, said all three family members were found dead inside the home Sunday.

Jolene Oliver was 40 years old. Aaron Tuck was 45. Emily Tuck was 17. They are among the victims of one of the deadliest mass killings in Canadian history.

RCMP now confirm at least 18 people, including an RCMP officer, were killed in the rampage. The gunman was fatally shot by police who responded to 911 calls about gunfire and pursued him through several communities.

'They've always stuck together'

The senselessness of the deaths of Oliver, Tuck and their teenage daughter has left other members of their family haunted. 

"For 20 years, they've had quite the journey, and they've always stuck together," Oliver-McCurdie said.

"No matter how hard it was, they always stayed together. They always focused on family and staying together.

"There were times when they literally had nothing, but they always stuck together. At least they died together."

Oliver and Tuck met years ago in Alberta. She was a waitress and he was one of her regular customers. They moved to Nova Scotia two years ago when his mother became ill and eventually inherited the family home.

Tuck, known to his friends as "Friar," worked as a mechanic. Oliver continued working as a waitress, a job she loved.

"She just loved connecting with people and helping and listening," Oliver-McCurdie said in a phone interview from her home in Red Deer, Alta.

"She is amazing. She's my best friend. She was always so wise. She had the weirdest wisdom." 

'She didn't even get to live her life'

Emily, just a few weeks shy of high school graduation, was deciding whether she wanted to pursue a career in music or in welding.

Adept at violin, she was also a budding mechanic after a childhood spent tinkering with cars in the garage with her father.

"She didn't even get to live her life. She had so much potential ... so much love, so smart, so caring, so humble," Oliver-McCurdie said. 

"Emily was amazing. She loves mechanics and playing music and she loved reading books. 

"And when you can get her to really smile, she can light up an entire community. She was pretty cool."

They didn't need to spend money to make memories.
- Tammy Oliver-McCurdie

In recent weeks, with the coronavirus pandemic shuttering business across the country, money was tight.

Oliver-McCurdie said she takes comfort in knowing they spent their final days together without distraction, taking walks and playing music together as a family.

One of the last Facebook posts from the family was a video of Emily playing the violin for her father in the living room. 

"They got to spend the last few weeks together as a family and just enjoy each other's company," she said. "They were having fun.

"They didn't need to spend money to make memories. They just persevered and they just made the best of every situation and worked with what they had and made a great life." 

WATCH | A video of Emily Tuck, 17, playing violin for her father posted to Facebook

A final song: Emily Tuck plays the violin

Duration 2:22
Emily Tuck, 17, was one of the victims of a deadly shooting rampage in N.S. She and her parents were found dead in their Portapique home. This is the final video posted of her online.
 
The shooting rampage began late Saturday in Portapique, a quiet community about 40 kilometres west of Truro. 
 
The violence didn't end until 12 hours later when the gunman was killed after being intercepted by officers about 90 kilometres away in Enfield, north of Halifax.
 
The shooter was not a stranger to the family. He lived on the adjacent property. 
 
Oliver-McCurdie said she'd heard of tense exchanges between the family and their neighbour in the past, but nothing that would foreshadow the deaths of so many.

'We don't have any answers'

As details of the rampage hit the news in bits and pieces, Oliver-McCurdie began to worry. Her sister wasn't answering the phone.

Her niece's social media accounts had gone silent.

Watching the news break from nearly 5,000 kilometres away, she felt helpless. She thought of buying a plane ticket.

She prayed that they had run into the woods for cover. Or maybe they were injured in hospital.

More than 10 agonizing hours later, a call from the RCMP confirmed her worst fears. 

The waiting was torture. Knowing the truth has left her with a grief so suffocating she finds it difficult to breathe, she said.

The bodies of her family members will remain inside the home until Tuesday. Police have told her little else. 

"We don't have any answers on what happened. I have a lot of questions."

Oliver-McCurdie has been left to wrestle with her questions as she plans two funerals. Because of the pandemic, family members on opposite sides of the country will not be able to grieve together.

Oliver-McCurdie said the family is taking solace in all the messages of support they have received from people in Portapique, from Canadians across the country, and from other grieving families. 

The tragedy should serve as a reminder to hold loved ones close, she said. 

She had a falling out with her sister years ago and regrets the time they lost. 

"By the grace of God, I was able to mend that in the last few months. I just wish I called her more, now knowing that I had such limited time.

"If there are people out there, if there's anybody in their life that they need to mend a fence with, do it sooner than later because you never know. You never know."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Wallis Snowdon is a journalist with CBC Edmonton focused on bringing stories to the website and the airwaves. She loves helping people tell their stories on issues ranging from health care to the courts. Originally from New Brunswick, Wallis has reported in communities across Canada, from Halifax to Fort McMurray. She previously worked as a digital and current affairs producer with CBC Radio in Edmonton. Wallis has a bachelor of journalism (honours) from the University of King's College in Halifax, N.S. Share your stories with Wallis at wallis.snowdon@cbc.ca.

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4KemlpsMdY&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells

 

THE OLD CREW REUNION 2 YEARS ON

1,049 views
Streamed live on Apr 20, 2022
3.43K subscribers
 

David Amos
Go figure why this crew still accuses me of working with the corrupt cops after all these years.Nobody is that dumb

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/family-lawyers-call-for-more-live-testimony-in-nova-scotia-s-mass-shooting-inquiry-1.6419592 

 

Lawyers for victims' families call for more testimony in N.S. shooting inquiry

They say opportunities needed for followup questions, testing evidence

The Mass Casualty Commission leading the inquiry has now laid out the full timeline of what it believes happened across April 18 and 19, 2020, based on interviews, 911 calls, police radio logs and other evidence.

But lawyers for the victims' families said Wednesday that written accounts are simply not enough, because they need the ability to ask followup questions and clarify important details to make sure the inquiry's working with the best evidence.

"It leaves the inference, rightly or wrongly, that there is an avoidance to call a witness," said Tara Miller, who represents family members of Aaron Tuck and Kristen Beaton, who were killed by the gunman.

"That necessary questions are not being asked, and that information is not being disclosed and difficult truths may not be uncovered."

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

The commission had asked to hear from participants about gaps and errors in the record they've noticed so far, or comment on emerging themes.

In the past five weeks of the inquiry, there have been eight witnesses called in person. Two more officers testified Thursday, bringing the total to 10.

Miller also said there's an impression the inquiry is running out of time to hear from witnesses, as the spring schedule leaves little time for testimony, which is "unsettling for our client and further assists in the erosion of confidence in the process."

The commission's interim report is due May 1, but Miller said it's clear they cannot yet make any factual findings of what happened over the two days of the massacre "as this information is still not complete."

Joshua Bryson, who represents the family of victims Joy and Peter Bond, said getting to hear earlier this week directly from two firefighters and a victim's father about being at the Onslow fire hall when police mistakenly thought they spotted the gunman and opened fire was "moving and very informative."

Greg Muise, Onslow fire chief, Darrell Currie, deputy chief, and Portapique, N.S., resident Richard Ellison, left to right, field questions about the incident at the Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade Hall at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry in Halifax on Monday. (Andrew Vaughan/Canadian Press)

Bryson said based on that testimony, he heard details he "certainly didn't glean" from any of the previous documents or interviews provided by the commission.

While the commission has a trauma-informed approach that aims to make witnesses comfortable when sharing their information, Bryson said this mandate should not "blunt" the inquiry's search for answers.

"There is a great concern by my clients that the trauma-informed approach will continue to be attempted … as a measure to curtail witness testimony and curtail the commission's mandate to make findings," Bryson said. 

Lawyer Sandra McCulloch, whose firm represents many victims' families, said she was especially disappointed to see the police union's recent request to have an officer give evidence by written affidavit.

McCulloch said the National Police Federation's request for the officer to use a question-and-answer document, drafted by commission lawyers, is taking a "narrow" view of testimony on specific topics that won't be able to illustrate why the officer took certain actions.

Union says other ways of testifying must come first

Brian Sauvé, president of the union, said Wednesday it is always open to having Mounties testify — when necessary.

"We should be exhausting every other available opportunity to gather that evidence," he said. 

Lawyers said they are still unclear on when multiple people they have requested might testify, including key witnesses such as the gunman's partner, Lisa Banfield.

The inquiry will take a break from public hearings next week to honour the second anniversary of the massacre. It will resume on April 25.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/onslow-belmont-fire-hall-shooting-amid-hunt-for-manhun-1.6415529

 

Mountie who shot at fire hall had 'no doubt' N.S. gunman was outside

Man who was targeted was in fact local emergency management co-ordinator, not the mass killer

Const. Terry Brown said there was no doubt in his mind a man in a safety vest running behind an RCMP cruiser towards the fire hall in Onslow, N.S., in the midst of the frenzied hunt for a mass shooter was the suspect he'd heard the gunman's spouse describe hours earlier. 

The RCMP officer recounted the "split-second" decision he and his partner made before discharging their carbines in the direction of what turned out to be a civilian on April 19, 2020, in a lengthy interview with the public inquiry examining the response to the mass shooting that claimed the lives of 22 people, including a pregnant woman and a Mountie. 

"I was sure that he was — if he got away, he was going to go kill more people, because there was no doubt in my mind … that that's the guy we were looking for," Brown told investigators with the Mass Casualty Commission on March 10, 2022, according to new details released by the inquiry on Monday.

Brown said he was not aware the fire hall was being used as a comfort centre for people told to leave their homes in Portapique, N.S., the tiny community 28 kilometres away where 13 people had been murdered the night before. He also told the inquiry he did not know that a fellow Mountie from Pictou County had been sent there to provide security that morning.

The gunman was driving a replica RCMP cruiser and was disguised as a Mountie. Brown said his partner, Const. Dave Melanson, tried to radio colleagues after they slammed on the brakes of their unmarked Nissan Altima less than 100 metres from the fire hall to alert them they saw an RCMP cruiser and who they thought was Gabriel Wortman, the man wanted for murder. 

Two RCMP officers started firing in the direction of the Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade hall. (CBC)

Brown said he didn't even notice a second person at the hall, the actual RCMP officer sitting in his patrol car, and had his carbine pointed at another man in the parking lot who was wearing a vest. 

"And he's looking at me and then he ducks behind the car, and I was sure he was getting a gun," Brown told the inquiry. "We're yelling, like, 'Show us your hands.' And this is happening very, very quickly."

He said he started firing when the man started running toward the building and in retrospect, the "tunnel vision" of concentration he experienced meant that he didn't hear his own rifle go off or realize that his partner also fired. 

The man wearing the high-visibility yellow and orange safety vest, David Westlake, was the emergency management co-ordinator for Colchester County and was at the fire hall to help connect displaced people with support provided by the Red Cross. 

Surveillance footage captured outside the fire hall shows Const. Terry Brown and Const. Dave Melanson leaving the parking lot less than five minutes after they started firing. (Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade surveillance cameras)

Westlake, who spoke to commission investigators last June, has a different recollection of the same moments, when he said he was walking behind the Pictou County cruiser and a grey vehicle screeched to a halt across the parking lot. 

"I never heard 'police' or 'show your hands.' I heard 'get down.' And I am adamant to this day this is what I heard," Westlake said in his interview.

"I remember a shot that sounded like a sonic boom and then another one that was really loud and I'm moving at this time." 

Brown fired four rounds and Melanson fired one, inquiry documents show. 

Const. Dave Gagnon was stationed outside the fire hall to provide security on April 19, 2020. He got out of his cruiser and put his hands up at 10:21 a.m. after two fellow RCMP officers started firing toward the hall. (Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade surveillance cameras)

Westlake said he ran inside yelling "shots fired," and ducked down as he entered the fire hall to pick up the portable radio he had dropped. It would be hours before he realized he was the Mounties' target. 

Const. Dave Gagnon, the officer from Pictou County who was sitting in his parked vehicle, tried to radio back to the officers. He also yelled at them and they finally dropped their guns, he told Nova Scotia's Serious Incident Response Team, the police watchdog agency that investigated the shooting at the fire hall. It found all three officers experienced problems getting on their radios due to getting "bonged out," a problem that results from many people trying to talk at once. 

On Monday, the public inquiry heard audio that Gagnon was able to transmit. 

"Hey! Hey! Hey! Hey.... Who are you shooting at? It's Gagnon," he said. 

4 men hid for an hour

In the hall, two firefighters had been assisting Richard Ellison, a man from Portapique whose son was killed the previous evening. 

Greg Muise, the fire chief, and Darrell Currie, the deputy chief, previously told CBC they hid in terror behind tables for an hour after hearing the shots outside their hall, thinking the actual gunman was outside and having heard someone banging on one of the hall's doors. 

                 Sources: Mass Casualty Commission / Twitter (CBC)

Muise and Currie told CBC at the beginning of public hearings that the shooting has caused lasting trauma and they remain frustrated that no one from the RCMP has ever apologized or explained why shots were fired. 

Muise, Currie and Ellison testified together in a panel on Monday in Halifax and told the inquiry's commissioners they feared for their lives. 

"I remember thinking, how am I going to die? Am I going to bleed out on the floor of this comfort centre? Am I going to see this person? Is he going to shoot through the wall? It was pretty horrific," Currie said. 

'Is everyone OK?'

Westlake was the only one of the four to speak to a Mountie in the minutes after the shooting. He said Gagnon and the man he later learned was Melanson stepped inside the hall briefly. Surveillance video shows they were inside the hall for 30 and 17 seconds respectively. 

"I heard somebody come in and say, 'Is everybody OK? Is anybody hurt,' or something along that line. And I responded back, 'No. All four of us are OK,'" Westlake recounted. 

Gagnon, in his Serious Incident Response Team interview later on April 19, 2020, said after checking the group was OK he told the other two officers, "Everybody's good in there."

Westlake and the firefighters all said no one explained who shot at them or why.

On Monday in Halifax, Muise said they felt like "hostages." He said things would have been different if the Mounties had identified themselves and relayed the group was safe.

"You know, 'We're RCMP, we're here, we're sorry, what's going on in there, we'll be back to talk to you.' Nothing. We had nothing, just like we were shoved under a rug somewhere and left," he said. 

Surveillance video from the Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade hall on April 19, 2020, shows Brown at the rear of the building. The time code on the surveillance video is 10 minutes fast. (Mass Casualty Commission)

Brown said he circled the building, unsure if the actual gunman was on the property, and learned after that everyone inside was fine. 

"I was upset. I wasn't crying or upset in that way. I was just upset because … I knew that that's a big deal. We just discharged our weapons. I've never discharged my weapon while on duty other than to put down an animal," he said in his interview with the commission. 

Surveillance video from the hall shows Brown and Melanson were at the hall for less than five minutes. They left to continue their pursuit of the gunman.

Meanwhile, the four men in the hall continued hiding and learned that the RCMP had tweeted that Wortman, who by that point had killed 19 people, had been spotted in the Onslow-Belmont area at the same time the shots had erupted. 

At one point, Westlake looked outside and didn't see Gagnon's car — which the officer had moved away from the front of the building — so he told the group they should move between the fire trucks so they'd be better protected, he explained to the commission investigators. They didn't emerge from the hall for about an hour and after calling people to find out what was happening. 

$40K in damage

Brown and Melanson left behind nearly $40,000 worth of damage, including to one of the fire trucks, a monument and an electronic sign at the end of the parking lot near to where they fired.

"You could see where the bullets they came through that door just like it wasn't even there. If they would have hit one of us, it would've been the end of us. Big time," Ellison testified Monday. 

Westlake told the commission's investigators that in the weeks that followed the incident, he went to the RCMP to demand they cover the costs of damage to the fire hall and continued to work with them, assisting with the search for a missing child, and made inquiries to check in on how Gagnon was doing. 

"I fought very hard with the RCMP to pay the bills, to get rid of the scars at the fire hall because at lot of people were driving by and looking at it," Westlake said. 

 Greg Muise, Onslow fire chief, Darrell Currie, deputy chief and Portapique resident Richard Ellison, left to right, field questions about the incident at the Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade Hall at the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry on April 11, 2022. (Andrew Vaughan/Canadian Press)

But he told the inquiry that even as he outwardly made jokes about the experience at the fire hall and tried to process it with humour, it was taking its toll.

"For 30 years I witnessed a lot of trauma, but … this was more than what I could ever expect. And it took me a long time to say it's not my fault this occurred. And I don't really care if anybody views me as broken….. I don't want this to happen to anybody else," Westlake said. 

He said he struggled to understand — knowing that the officers would've been aiming at his centre of mass — why the two officers chose to employ lethal force based on the visual of something as common as a safety vest. 

"I've never had malice to the two individuals that pulled the trigger. I still don't to this day. I want to meet them. I want to ask them how they missed," he said. 

No 'blue on blue'

Brown never disputed that he was aiming to stop Westlake and took issue with the how the fire hall incident has been considered a "blue on blue" situation, where a police officer shot at one of his own. 

He said his target was always the man in the safety vest and had he wanted to shoot the cruiser, he would have hit it. He said the man was an "identical match" to the description of the gunman given to him earlier by Lisa Banfield, the shooter's spouse, and from another RCMP officer, Const. Rodney Peterson.

Thirteen Deadly Hours: The Nova Scotia Shooting

2 years ago
Duration 45:10
The Fifth Estate presents a comprehensive inquiry into this year's mass shooting in Nova Scotia, chronicling 13 hours of mayhem that constitute one of Canada's deadliest events. [Correction: In the video, we incorrectly said officers jumped out of a cruiser outside the Onslow fire hall and began firing. In fact, the person who was interviewed said it was not a cruiser and she believed it was a Hyundai. Nova Scotia's Serious Incident Response Team has since found that it was an unmarked police vehicle.]

Banfield had given Brown the information while she was in the back of an ambulance that morning after she emerged from the woods in Portapique after escaping the gunman the night before. Peterson passed the gunman on the road in Glenholme, N.S., and relayed a description of him back to his colleagues.

In his inquiry interview, Brown said having GPS on RCMP officers' portable radios activated, enabling the risk manager in telecoms to monitor locations, "would have changed a lot of things."

'Desperately wanted to get that guy'

Brown's interview with the public inquiry, a transcript of which was released, was the first in-depth description of what prompted he and Melanson to start firing. He previously provided a statement to the police watchdog agency that investigated and cleared Brown and Melanson of any criminal wrongdoing, finding they had reasonable grounds to believe they were firing at the killer.

Brown and his partner Melanson had been working since 3 a.m., called in to help with the investigation into what was happening in Portapique, N.S. 

Hours after interviewing Banfield, the pair were in Great Village when calls came in about a shooting in Wentworth, N.S., so they put on their hardbody armour and rushed to their cars, racing toward reported sightings with their carbines at their side. 

"I remember thinking, like, we're going to be in a position where we might be able to get this guy," Brown told the commission. "We desperately wanted to get that guy."

The fire hall and a truck were damaged during the shooting. Repairing the damage cost $39,000 and the fire brigade says the RCMP paid the bill. (Submitted by Sharon McLellan)

The fire hall incident wasn't the first time they came across a cruiser and wondered if it was the suspect. As they headed toward a sighting in Glenholme, they spotted the marked vehicle belonging to Const. Rodney MacDonald and stopped 50 metres away, radioing to confirm who it was. 

In the hour that followed the fire hall shooting, the pair came upon the scene where Const. Heidi Stevenson was killed, passed the EHS station where unbeknownst to them a bleeding Const. Chad Morrison was waiting for help, and came upon the distraught daughter of Gina Goulet, the last person murdered.

Brown stressed to inquiry investigators that April 19 was not his first high-stress active shooter situation. He was on the ground in Moncton, N.B., in 2014 when three officers were shot and killed by a gunman and had seen many difficult situations in his 13 years with the force. 

"At no point did I feel that I wasn't in control of what I was doing, that the situation was too big for me. I felt, for the most part prepared, as prepared as you could be….. I wasn't running around that day recklessly, you know?" he said. 

"I wanted to stop that guy from killing people that day. It was as simple as that."


 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/onslow-belmont-fire-hall-shooting-lasting-imacts-1.6360267 

 

Firefighters say RCMP gunfire at N.S. fire hall caused lasting trauma

Greg Muise and Darrell Currie were inside Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade when 2 RCMP officers fired at it

On April 19, 2020, amid the manhunt for a shooter disguised as a Mountie who ended up killing 22 people in rural Nova Scotia, two RCMP officers pulled over at the Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade hall and started firing.

They had mistaken a municipal official in a safety vest standing beside an actual RCMP cruiser for their suspect, causing nearly $40,000 worth of damage to the rural station.

But the impact went far beyond a shattered sign and punctured siding.

Muise and Currie, the chief and deputy chief, assumed the actual gunman was outside and spent an hour with two other men huddled behind tables, fearing for their lives.

It wasn't until later that they learned the shooter had driven by their hall not long before the Mounties stopped there and that he was long gone when the gunfire erupted. The officers left without talking to the firefighters.   

Two RCMP officers started firing in the direction of the Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade hall on April 19, 2020, around 10:21 a.m. (CBC)

In the nearly two years since, they have struggled with the lasting trauma. 

"It took part of my life.... I lost part of my life," Muise said Tuesday during public hearings for the mass shooting inquiry.

"The fire hall was like a second home to me.... I'm nervous every time I go there, not sure, not knowing what's going to happen next. It's a challenge." 

Muise and Currie attended the first day of the public proceedings for the commission in their uniforms. They were not swayed by the commissioners' assurances during opening remarks that the inquiry would be transparent and thorough.

"Those are words, and we've heard words for 15 months," Currie said in an interview.

"They post updates on the website, but nothing substantial has come out of that. So without seeing any actions, which we haven't seen at this point, I don't believe that anything is going to change."

Though they once hoped a public inquiry would shed light on their experience and how it could be prevented, the firefighters' confidence waned as more than a year passed without hearing from the Mass Casualty Commission.

They said they finally spoke to inquiry investigators earlier this month after their lawyers pushed the commission to reach out and after inquiry staff had already prepared a summary document detailing what happened at the fire hall.

But they said the interview didn't dig into what actually happened to them that spring morning — when the RCMP asked them to open the hall as a comfort centre for people displaced by the violence in Portapique, N.S., — and focused only on how it impacted them. 

Without that, "the context of the supports required and long term effects will not hold as much relevance and be difficult to understand," Currie said in a letter to the commission he sent last week. 

The Mass Casualty Commission's mandate includes looking at the events of April 18-19, 2020, including the police response, as well as how the people most affected were treated afterward. 

Muise and Currie are participants in the inquiry and represented by Patterson Law. The firm also represents 23 others, including people closely affected and more than half of the families who lost loved ones.

Like some family members who say they have lost faith in the process, the pair say they're not holding their breath that the joint federal-provincial inquiry will lead to lasting change. 

"I've been disappointed all along in the way the commission has handled the proceedings so far. So I'm coming into this with low expectations," said Currie. 

     A municipal official who was outside the fire hall ran inside when gunfire started, as captured by security footage in the fire hall. (Onslow Belmont Fire Brigade surveillance cameras)

Barbara McLean, the commission's investigations director, previously told CBC News the start of the hearings does not mark the end of her team's investigation and that it will continue until the final report in November

On Tuesday, the commissioners said they intend to call witnesses when needed during public hearings to clarify any controversial information and have incorporated interviews with about 150 people into documents that will be introduced.

One document will focus on the Onslow fire hall incident.

But Muise said he doesn't understand why they were contacted so late in the inquiry process and he doesn't think there will be enough time to call or subpoena all the relevant people to testify. 

"I think they should have been looking at witnesses [when the inquiry's work started]. I think they waited too long to do that and now they're trying to rush it to get it done," he said. 

Deputy fire chief Darrell Currie was in the bay with the fire trucks when he heard gunfire. He looked to Twitter for information as no one came inside to explain what was going on. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

Currie wants people to remember that the impacts of the mass shooting go beyond the losses for families of people killed and extend to those injured and deeply affected as a result of the gunman's rampage. 

"Our story is largely forgotten when the big story is told," said Currie. "We don't have a grieving process to go through, we have our own trauma to deal with.... There's pretty much an entire community that's been traumatized." 

Though he and Muise both still go to fire calls, Currie has been on leave from his day job after being diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

Fire Chief Greg Muise says the call to help at his own fire station ended up being the worst call he  responded to in the decades he's been a volunteer firefighter. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

He's attended workshops and dozens of psychologist and psychiatrist appointments trying to process the experience. 

"I'm taking medication I never took before. I had trouble sleeping, concentrating, focus, depression, anxiety — all that sort of textbook PTSD-type symptoms," he said. 

"As a first responder, we go to help. We know basically what we're responding to. But this is something that just happened to us. We experienced it and it's been tough." 

A changed view of RCMP 

After the fire hall was hit with gunfire, the province's Serious Incident Response Team investigated and last winter, it cleared the two officers who fired the shots of any criminal wrongdoing, finding they had reasonable grounds to believe a man outside the hall was the killer

The firefighters had never heard an explanation directly from the force, let alone an apology, and never heard directly from the people who shot the hall, Muise said, adding he knows who they are and has since been on a call with one of them. 

 Greg Muise and Darrell Currie attended the opening day of the Mass Casualty Commission at the Halifax Convention Centre. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

Muise said over four decades, he attended emergency calls alongside Mounties, but his trust eroded when police fired in his direction and neither of the officers came inside to check on them. 

"I always felt comfortable around them. We did our job and they did their job and you know, what happened that day just kind of took that away. Not sure who we can trust out there anymore," he said.

"Leaving us there in the hall for an hour. It's like a hostage situation to me."

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 Darrell Currie. (902) 890-1328 darrellbcurrie@gmail.com

 

 

 

 

Post office closure plan for Deer Island opposed by leaders

$
0
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suyzo1bVVkQ

 


Southwest Magazine: New Brunswick Southwest MP John Williamson Interview

5 views
Jul 25, 2022
912 subscribers
MP John Williamson discusses historic inflation rates, the August 2022 closure of Grand Manan's only bank, the effects of ArriveCAN on Campobello Island tourism, the impending reduction of hours at the Vanceboro/St. Croix international border and more on CHCO-TV. Original Broadcast Date: July 2022

 

 

 

Post office closure plan for Deer Island opposed by leaders

Canada Post says it tried but failed to find someone to fill the position after the postmistress at Leonardville resigned on April 30, but Deer Island Chamber of Commerce Chairwoman Katherine Landry, West Isles Local Service District (LSD) Advisory Committee Chairperson Sheena Young and New Brunswick Southwest MP John Williamson, among others, question how hard the Crown corporation tried.

They also question Canada Post’s claim that it consulted with the community before deciding on this change. Jacqueline Mingo on Prince Edward Island, Maritime president of the Canadian Post Masters and Assistants Association (CPAA), understands that a Canada Post local area superintendent from Fredericton spoke to a former member of the West Isles Local Service District Committee not from Leonardville.

Williamson’s office has written to Canada Post President and CEO Doug Ettinger — a former president and CEO of Ganong Bros. in St. Stephen, incidentally — seeking information on whom the corporation consulted and the process followed to come to this decision.

Williamson says the decision breaches Canada Post’s mandate to serve rural communities as well as a federal moratorium on closing rural post offices that specifically lists Leonardville as a post office not to be closed.

 

Map of southwestern New Brunswick showing Deer Island. Photo from the Deer Island Chamber of Commerce website.

According to Mingo, Canada Post can get around the moratorium if it makes an honest effort but cannot fill a position after a postmaster quits or retires. Tim Blizzard, Canada Post’s director of operations for New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island, said in an interview from Moncton that the corporation made two attempts to find someone to take over the job at Leonardville, but Mingo says the entire process took only one month.

The Leonardville postmistress resigned on April 30, Mingo says. “They said community discussions were completed on May 31, and the final recommendation is to proceed with the permanent closure of the post office and the installation of permanent CMBs [community mail boxes],” she says. She adds that the decision was to be effective May 31 but was delayed till after the community mail boxes were installed. Deer Island resident Brooke Young, who has circulated a petition against this decision, understands that the changeover will take place on July 22.

The CPAA is the trade union representing staff in small town and rural post offices. They are Canada Post employees covered by a collective agreement, but in some cases, including Leonardville, these rural postmasters have to provide their own post office premises.

After a former Leonardville postmistress retired, a new person took over but had to rent facilities at $800 a month, cutting seriously into the income of someone working 20.5 hours a week, Mingo says. The collective agreement provides for extra money to cover higher expenses, “but, obviously, nobody told her that,” the union leader says.

She contends that more people would have shown interest had Canada Post put up posters and taken other steps to advertise the position and the possibility of losing the service. “I think if people knew it was coming down to that, there might have been more push to keep it, so to me, I don’t believe they tried as hard as they said they did,” she says, contending that the corporation “just took the answer they wanted” after “reaching out to the wrong person” for community consultation. “I just think at some of these smaller ones in these remote areas, they’re just hoping that nobody will pay much attention,” she says.

Sheena Young, chairperson of the LSD advisory committee, offered her business location, The Boatique at Hibernia, as an alternative location for the post office. Mingo understands that Canada Post rejected this location as it lies 500 metres beyond the outer limits of Leonardville. Williamson’s staff determined from Google maps that The Boatique is 1.8 kilometers, a bit more than a mile, from the current post office.

Mingo describes Canada Post as “unreasonable” for not compromising over the distance. “If Canada Post is really wanting to keep up, they should make accommodations for something like that,” she says. Williamson feels that Canada Post should accept the offer from The Boatique, which would still be closer than Lord’s Cove, about five kilometres away.

The outlet at Lord’s Cove “is not a post office” but, rather, “a retail outlet, a retail counter, that the store owns,” Mingo and others say. Employees get closer to minimum wage without federal health, pension and other benefits. Mingo says the store owner could decide to end the contract at any time, forcing people to take the ferry to the nearest post office at Back Bay on the mainland.

If the Leonardville Post Office closes, Deer Island will lose “our last remaining federal employee,” Sheena Young says. The community has already lost RCMP officers based on the island, border security and fisheries officers, she says.

Mingo says Deer Island will have to “make noise” to reverse this decision, which community leaders seem ready to do.

Canada Post is a federal Crown corporation, but Fundy The Isles Saint John West provincial MLA Andrea Anderson Mason supports this effort by the islanders to retain the post office. “There are certain essential services that we must recognize, and certainly postal service is definitely one of them,” she says, adding, “We have to be careful not to erode services on our islands in particular.”

“Well, the people on the other side of the island where Leonardville is are very upset, and I would say most islanders are very upset because this isn’t the first post office we’ve lost. We also lost the post office in Fairhaven, so, you know, we continue to lose services,” says Landry, chairwoman of the chamber and a member of the LSD advisory committee.

“Canada Post has a monopoly to serve the country, and they have to do it, whether it is a small community like Deer Island or downtown Toronto,” says Williamson, the MP.

“A post office, as you know, is a place you go to meet your neighbour and to learn of community events, and to take this from Deer Island is a substantial blow to our culture and the support that we receive from the federal government,” states Sheena Young.

Derwin Gowan is a reporter for various media in south-western New Brunswick. This article was first published in The Quoddy Tides on July 8, 2022. 

Tel. (207) 853-4806

 qtides@midmaine.com

 

https://shopboatique.com/


1600 Route 772
Hibernia Cove, NB
E5V 1L7

506 747 2139

https://www.charlottefm.ca/2020/04/28/sheena-young-of-deer-island-talks-with-mark-downey-about-doing-business-during-covid-19/

 

https://www.facebook.com/Deer-Island-Chamber-of-Commerce-239936059732576/


The Deer Island Chamber of Commerce set up this page to promote the Island community and member business.
1,056 peoplelike this
1,132 people follow this
(506) 755-0133
 

General Questions about Deer Island Chamber of Commerce

     Katherine Landry
​     Phone:  506 - 755 - 0133
 
 
      950 Route 772
     Fairhaven, NB
     E5V 1P5
     Fax:  506 - 747 - 1093
     Email:  deerisland.chamberofcommerce@gmail.com
 
 
young's lobster company ltd

40 Lord's Cove Road 
Lord's CoveNBE5V 1G1
506-747-1999

https://www.girlsgonewater.com/sheena

 

“The water has never let my family down.” - Sheena Young

Sheena Young

Lobster Buyer & Entrepreneur

Sheena is a businesswoman involved in many aspects of fisheries on Deer Island, New Brunswick. She works as a lobster buyer for her family business and recently opened a storefront called the Boatique in partnership with her sister to service local fishermen on the island.

From a young age, Sheena had the opportunity to be out on the water with her father, who was a fisherman. She adds context, “There are pictures of me in my dad’s new boat at three weeks [old].” Sheena credits her father for encouraging her to be a woman on the water, which wasn’t always common, and explains that one of her favourite things to do when she was young was to take a day off school in the spring to go lobster fishing with him.

As a businesswoman, her ethic is to first build honesty, integrity, and trust, and then everything else will follow. She considers herself a fisherman first and a seafood buyer after. “Today, for my sister and me to be leading a business in a completely male-dominated industry is something that we relish the challenge of, and I think have really earned our way and earned respect. If you want to talk rope, or quality of bait… we can talk the talk because we’ve walked the walk."

 



 


 

 


The Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 24, 2022 - with Paul Palango

$
0
0

 

Nighttime (podcast) - Jordan Bonaparte / Curiouscast | Listen Notes

 
 
 

PAUL P - A PAIR OF NUKNUUKS, AND ALL KIND OF QUESTIONS

2,133 views
Streamed live on Dec 29, 2020
3.43K subscribers
Please email us any tips: 
nsinvestigators@gmail.com 
 
Our team: 
Tara 
Please subscribe to Tara's channel: 
 
Steve L-TT 
Please subscribe to his channel:  
Steve's Twitter: 
 
JMSO 
Please subscribe to Adrian's channel: 
Adrian's Twitter:  
 
Rage in the Kage 
Please sub to Kage's channel: 
 
 Oh Dear 
Please subscribe to her channel:  
 
AND OF COURSE, ALL OF THE HUGE SUPPORT OF ALL OF YOU!!!! THANKS SO MUCH TO THE DISCORD!!! WITHOUT ALL OF YOU, THIS WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE :) 
 
God bless!!!! 
Seamus
SONG
Fear God
ARTIST
LuxrayBeats
LICENSES
 

20 Comments

David Amos
Perhaps we should talk
 
David Amos
 
 "The document first was sent anonymously to Little Grey Cells, aYou Tube channel, which operates out of Alberta. The show’s host, Seamus Gorman, has been discussing it for the past few days in his broadcasts as part of a group called The Discord. It is comprised of 380 citizen investigators who have banded together since the massacre to dig up information."
 
#TrustTheMaDHaTTer
 @David Amos  381 😏I'm not in the discord lol
 
 
David Amos
 @#TrustTheMaDHaTTer  You are not funny either

 

Methinks I should ask Bonaparte's beloved "Burt and Ernie" if they know how their buddies sleep at night N'esy Pas?

  

David Amos

<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
AttachmentSun, Jul 24, 2022 at 11:22 PM
To: NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, darrellbcurrie@gmail.com, tkaye@pattersonlaw.ca, Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/status/1551387950944079872 

 

 
Hardly anyone at #MCC today! Maybe that’s because they have the same panelists, repeating the same information…..just a different spin on it. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck….. Maybe some real witnesses would be more helpful!
 

Replying to @darrellbcurrie
 
I talked to you before this show began then called in and mentioned you before you called in Correct?
 
youtube.com
the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 24, 2022 - with Paul Palango
Paul Palango and I will discuss the unfolding public inquiry into the Nova Scotia Mass Shootings. Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice ...
11:04 PM · Jul 24, 2022

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "McCulloch, Sandra"<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:21:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andy Douglas should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their
article published on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


I will be unavailable July 21st and 22nd attending the  the Mass
Casualty Commission. I will be accessing email only periodically, as
time permits, and will attend to your message at the earliest
opportunity. If you require an urgent response, please contact Theresa
Kaye at tkaye@pattersonlaw.ca or (902) 897-2000




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Fraser, Sean - M.P."<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:21:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andy Douglas should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their
article published on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your message. This is an automated reply.
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<https://www.facebook.com/SeanFraserMP/photos/a.1628138987467042.1073741829.1627521694195438/2066666113614325/?type=3&theater>
Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter.com/SeanFraserMP>
Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www.instagram.com/seanfrasermp/?hl=en>
www.seanfrasermp.ca<file:///C:

/Users/Savannah%20DeWolfe/Downloads/www.seanfrasermp.ca>
Toll free: 1-844-641-5886
Please be advised that this account is for matters related to Central
Nova. If you live outside of Central Nova and your issue pertains to
immigration, please contact Minister@cic.gc.ca
I am currently receiving an extremely high number of emails.
If you are inquiring about Canada’s commitment to welcome vulnerable
Afghan refugees, you can find more information on Canada’s response to
the situation in Afghanistan
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan.html>.
The Government of Canada remains firm in its commitment to welcome
Afghan refugees to Canada, and will be working to increase the number
of eligible refugees to 40,000. This will be done through 2 programs:
1.      A special immigration program for Afghan nationals, and their
families, who assisted the Government of Canada.
You don’t need to currently be in Afghanistan or return to Afghanistan
to be eligible or to have your application processed once you’re able
to apply.
 Find out more about this special immigration
program<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures/immigration-program.html>
2.      A special humanitarian program focused on resettling Afghan
nationals who
·   are outside of Afghanistan
·   don’t have a durable solution in a third country
·   are part of one of the following groups:
·  women leaders
·  human rights
advocates<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures.html#human-rights>
·  persecuted religious or ethnic minorities
·  LGBTI individuals
·  journalists and people who helped Canadian journalists
How to reach us
Contact us using our web
form<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/en/>.Please
don’t send photos or other attachments until we ask you to.
By phone at +1-613-321-4243
·        Available both inside Canada and abroad
·        Monday to Friday, 6:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. (ET)
·        Saturday and Sunday, 6:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. (ET)
·        We’ll accept charges for collect calls or calls with reverse charges
If you or a loved one are a Canadian citizen or PR currently in
Afghanistan, contact Global Affairs Canada’s 24/7 Emergency Watch and
Response Centre ASAP by phone (+1-613-996-8885), email
(sos@international.gc.ca<mailto:sos@international.gc.ca>) or text
(+1-613-686-3658).
If you would like to immigrate to Canada, please click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/come-canada-tool.html>
to learn more.
To inquire about the status of an immigration case,click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application/check-status.html>.
You can also contact your local Member of Parliament for further
assistance. If you don’t know who your Member of Parliament is, you
can find out here, https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
If you have been the victim of fraud or want to report fraudulent
activity, please call the Canada Border Services Agency’s fraud
hotline at 1-888-502-9060.
For other general questions about Canadian immigration, click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/services/immigration-citizenship.html>.
Thank you.
/////
Veuillez noter que je reçois actuellement un nombre extrêmement élevé
de courriels.
Si vous vous renseignez sur l'engagement du Canada à accueillir les
réfugiés afghans vulnérables, vous pouvez trouver plus d'information
sur la réponse du Canada à la situation en Afghanistan
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan.html>.
Le gouvernement du Canada reste ferme dans son engagement à accueillir
des réfugiés afghans au Canada, et s'efforcera d'augmenter le nombre
de réfugiés admissibles à 40 000. Cela se fera par le biais de deux
programmes :
Un programme d'immigration spécial pour les ressortissants afghans, et
leurs familles, qui ont aidé le gouvernement du Canada.
Vous n'avez pas besoin d'être actuellement en Afghanistan ou d'y
retourner pour être admissible ou pour que votre demande soit traitée,
une fois que vous serez en mesure de présenter une demande.
               Pour en savoir plus sur ce programme d'immigration
spécial<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales/programme-immigration.html>
2.     Un programme humanitaire spécial axé sur la réinstallation des
ressortissants afghans qui
·            se trouvent à l'extérieur de l'Afghanistan
·            n’ont pas de solution durable dans un pays tiers
·            font partie de l'un des groupes suivants :
·            femmes leaders,
·            défenseurs des droits de la
personne<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales.html>,
·            minorités religieuses ou ethniques persécutées,
·            personnes LGBTI,
·            journalistes et personnes ayant aidé des journalistes canadiens.
Comment nous joindre
Veuillez communiquer avec nous en utilisant notre formulaire
Web<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/fr/>.
Veuillez ne pas envoyer de photos ou d'autres pièces jointes jusqu'à
ce que nous vous le demandions.
Par téléphone au +1-613-321-4243.
·            Disponible au Canada et à l’étranger.
·            Du lundi au vendredi, de 6 h 30 à 19 h (HE).
·            Samedi et dimanche, de 6 h 30 à 15 h 30 (HE).
·            Nous acceptons les frais pour les appels à frais virés ou
les appels avec inversion des frais.
Si vous ou un de vos proches êtes un citoyen canadien ou un RP
actuellement en Afghanistan, communiquez dès que possible avec le
Centre de veille et d'intervention d'urgence 24/7 d'Affaires mondiales
Canada par téléphone (+1-613-996-8885), par courriel
(sos@international.gc.ca) ou par texto (+1-613-686-3658).
Si vous souhaitez immigrer au Canada, veuillez cliquer
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/immigrer-canada.html>
pour en savoir plus.
Pour vous renseigner sur l'état d'un dossier d'immigration, cliquez
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/demande/verifier-etat.html>.
Vous pouvez également contacter votre député local pour obtenir une
assistance supplémentaire. Si vous ne savez pas qui est votre député,
vous pouvez le découvrir ici, https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr.
Si vous avez été victime d'une fraude ou si vous voulez signaler une
activité frauduleuse, veuillez appeler la ligne d'assistance
téléphonique de l'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada au
1-888-502-9060.
Pour d'autres questions générales sur l'immigration canadienne,
cliquez ici<canada.ca/immigration>.
Merci.





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Public Editor, The Toronto Star"<publiced@thestar.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:21:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andy Douglas should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their
article published on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

THANK YOU for contacting the Toronto Star Public Editor's office.

This office handles queries about  accuracy and the Star's
journalistic standards as set out in its Newsroom Policy and
Journalistic Standards Guide

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2011/12/07/toronto_star_newsroom_policy_and_journalistic_standards_guide.html



The public editor's office is staffed Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., by Public Editor Bruce Campion-Smith and Public Editor,
Associate, Maithily Panchalingam.



If you are requesting a correction or questioning journalistic
standards, please send a link or details of where you read the article
you are questioning, (e.g.- date, page number, digital device.) Please
include your full name and a telephone number where we can reach you
for further information if necessary. Unfortunately, due to the volume
of emails we receive, we cannot reply to every email, but we do read
them all, consider carefully the issues raised, and take appropriate
action to attempt to resolve complaints in cases of error or breach of
the Star's standards.



Some messages to the public editor may be published in Bruce
Campion-Smith's public editor column, which explores journalistic
issues raised by readers. Please inform us if you do not want your
message published.

Corrections:  The public editor's office looks into claims of error on
any and all platforms on which the  Star publishes. The Star corrects
significant errors of fact. When we determine a correction is called
for, it will be published as soon as possible; the article will also
be corrected online and a correction appended. Generally, news
corrections are published on page A2 and corrections for other
sections (including Sports, Entertainment and Life)  are published in
those sections. Corrections are also published online:
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/corrections

Because many readers often point out the same error, we cannot notify
each person that we are publishing a correction. As well, because of
the volume of queries we receive, we are not always able to respond to
explain why we determined no correction is necessary. Every query
about a possible error is considered thoroughly however. We  thank all
readers  who take the time to help the Star report accurately.

Unpublishing: Generally, the Star does not delete (unpublish) content
from our websites or archives, except in some rare circumstances
following consultation with the editor-in-chief, managing editor, and
in some cases, legal counsel. In the case of verified errors, we will
correct/update the article and/or append corrections as necessary but
will not remove it from the Star' s digital  publishing record.

General feedback about coverage: If you are writing to express your
view of the Star's coverage, your message will be forwarded to the
appropriate department. Because of the volume of email we receive,
neither the public editor's office, nor the journalists in specific
departments, can respond to every reader comment about the Star's
coverage.

Letters to the Editor: If you want your comments expressing your view
considered for publication as a Letter to the Editor, please resend
your message to lettertoed@thestar.ca<mailto:lettertoed@thestar.ca>.
Letters must include full name, address and all phone numbers of
sender (daytime, evening and cellphone). Street names and phone
numbers will not be published. The Star reserves the right to edit
letters, which typically run 50-150 words. Please note: The Star
receives many more letters than it has  space to print. Due to the
volume, we unfortunately cannot acknowledge every submission.

Submissions to the Star: Commentaries, opinion pieces, story pitches
and press releases should be submitted to the section of the Star to
which they are best suited. A full list of departments is published on
the "Contact Us" page of the Star's website:
https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

How to reach a Star journalist: Most staff members, including
reporters, editors, columnists and photographers, can be reached by
email. In most cases the email address follows this formula (all lower
case, don't type spaces or the plus sign): first initial + last name
@thestar.ca. You can also reach staff in the Editorial department
(newsroom) via phone at 416-869-4300 or fax at 416-869-4328. Editorial
staff members can also be contacted within the department they work
for. To reach a freelance writer, please contact the section in which
his or her article appeared.

Subscriptions/Customer Service: The public editor's office handles
concerns about editorial content only.  For home delivery
subscriptions, delivery problems, billing inquiries and other customer
service matters, please email
circmail@thestar.ca<mailto:circmail@thestar.ca>. You may also go to
our Subscription page<http://www.thestar.com/about/subscribe.html> for
home delivery information.

Further information about how to contact other departments in the Star
can be found here: https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html



Thank you for reading your Toronto Star.





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Leger, Louis (PO/CPM)"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:21:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andy Douglas should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their
article published on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Bonjour, et merci pour votre courriel.  Je consulterai ma boîte de
réception périodiquement; pour les questions urgentes, veuillez
contacter Laura Peasey au Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca ou 506-230-1364 pour
l’assistance.

Hello and thank you for your email.  I will be checking my inbox only
periodically; for pressing matters please contact Laura Peasey at
Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca or 506-230-1364 for assistance.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 14:20:27 -0300
Subject: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango and Andy Douglas
should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their article published
on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Sean.Fraser"
<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>,
"mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Moiz.Karimjee"<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>,
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, andrew
<andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "darren.campbell"
<darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Gorman"
<Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, "michael.macdonald"
<michael.macdonald@thecanadianpress.com>, "Rhonda.Brown"
<Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, jesse
<jesse@viafoura.com>, publiced@thestar.ca, newsroom@therecord.com,
stevemckinley@thestar.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>

https://tj.news/telegraph-journal/101923082

'Trying to get their life back': Portapique in recovery

The appearance of normalcy in Portapique region should not be confused
with the absence of lingering trauma, according to Colchester North
MLA Tom Taggart. He was born and raised in Portapique and served as
municipal councillor at the time of the mass shooting.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:50:02 +0000
Subject: FRANK MAGAZINE TODAY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>



FRANK MAGAZINE JULY 20, 2022


THE LOCKYER FACTOR


by Paul Palango





If you haven’t already noticed, something truly strange happened on
the road to finding the truth about what actually happened before,
during and after the Nova Scotia massacres of April 18 and 19, 2020.
Lisa Banfield and her $1,200-an-hour lawyer, James Lockyer, appear to
have been controlling the show from the very beginning. The Lockyer
factor as a not-so-hidden influencer on the news is important to
address.
On April 19, 2020, just hours after Lisa Banfield arrived at the door
of Leon Joudrey, she contacted lawyer Kevin von Bargen in Toronto to
seek advice and help. The lawyer, a friend of Wortman and Banfield,
put her onto James Lockyer.
From that moment forward, her every word has been treated as gospel.
By the RCMP, by the Mass Casualty Commission, and by the compliant
media. Even those who believe her to have been a victim of domestic
violence at the hands of Gabriel Wortman (and she clearly was), but
also believe she might know more than she’s letting on — and that what
she knows might be important to the inquiry’s purported fact-finding
mission — have been dismissed as cranks and conspiracists.
According to financial documents released by the inquiry after Lisa
Banfield’s dramatic “testimony” on July 15, Banfield reported earnings
of $15,288 one recent year.
That would cover a day, plus HST, of Lockyer’s valuable time.
He has been on the clock for 27 months or so, his fees covered by
taxpayers through the Mass Casualty Commission.
Banfield’s finances, such as they are, would have been a juicy subject
for any curious lawyer, but she wasn’t allowed to be cross examined.
Too traumatic, remember.
Questions abound.
Why did Banfield hire an esteemed criminal lawyer? Did no one let her
in on her status as a victim?
Lockyer seems like an exotic choice. He made his name from the early
‘90s onward representing men wrongly convicted of murder, such as
Stephen Truscott, David Milgaard, Robert Baltovich and Guy Paul Morin.
Morin was falsely accused of killing 9-year-old Christine Jessop in
Queensville, Ontario, near Toronto.
I was the city editor at the Globe and Mail then. I was intimately
involved in the story which was being covered by one of our reporters,
Kirk Makin. I even at one point had a meeting with Makin and Morin’s
mother, who protested his innocence. At the time I was wrongly unmoved
and skeptical of her story, but Makin persisted in digging into it and
worked closely with Lockyer. Morin was eventually exonerated. Kudos to
all. I hope I got smarter after that.
Lockyer, who lived a block away from me in Toronto, went on to become
a champion of the wrongly convicted and started the Innocence Project
to work on their behalf. Among his many clients was Rubin (Hurricane)
Carter, the former boxer who was wrongly convicted of three murders in
Paterson, NJ and was the inspiration for the 1976 Bob Dylan epic
Hurricane.
In recent years, Lockyer and his Innocence Project became involved in
the case of Nova Scotia’s Glenn Assoun, who was wrongly convicted in
1999 of murdering Brenda Way in Dartmouth four years earlier.
Lockyer worked along with lawyers Sean MacDonald and Phil Campbell to
have Assoun’s conviction overturned after he had spent 17 years in
prison. In the final years of that campaign an activist reporter named
Tim Bousquet took on the Assoun case and wrote about it extensively
for years, channeling and publicizing what the lawyers and their
investigators had uncovered. To his credit Bousquet uncovered some
things on his own.
Perhaps the biggest revelation in the Assoun case was that the RCMP
had destroyed evidence and had mislead the courts about Assoun.
Bousquet joined with the CBC in 2020 and produced a radio series, Dead
Wrong, about the case. As Canadians should know well by now, both the
federal and Nova Scotia governments ignored what the Mounties were
caught doing.
Fast forward to the Nova Scotia massacres and the news coverage of it.
As I wrote in my recent book, 22 Murders: Investigating the Massacres,
Cover-up and Obstacles to Justice In Nova Scotia, I had a brief fling
with Bousquet and his on-line newspaper, The Halifax Examiner, in
2020.
After publishing an opening salvo in Maclean’s magazine in May 2020, I
couldn’t find anyone else interested in my reporting, which challenged
the official narrative. Maclean’s writer Stephen Maher introduced me
to Bousquet. I knew nothing about either him or the Halifax Examiner.
Over the next several weeks, Bousquet published five of my pieces and
I was pleasantly surprised to find that the Examiner punched well
above its weight. Its stories were being picked up and read across the
country. Although I had never met the gruff and the usually
difficult-to-reach Bousquet, I thought we had a mutual interest in
keeping the story alive as the mainstream media was losing interest in
it and were moving on. At first blush, Bousquet seemed like a true,
objective journalist determined to find the truth. Hell, I was even
prepared to work for nothing, just to get the story out.
“I have to pay you, man,” he insisted in one phone call.
I felt badly taking money from him. I had no idea what his company’s
financial situation might be, and I didn’t want to break the bank. He
said he could pay me $300 or so per story and asked me to submit an
invoice, which I did.
Soon afterward, a cheque for $1500 arrived. I cashed it and then my
wife Sharon and I sent him $500 each in after tax money as a donation.
Like I said, I didn’t want to be a drag on the Examiner.
Once we made the donations, Bousquet all but ghosted me. He was always
too busy to take my calls or field my pitches. I couldn’t tell if I
was being cancelled or had been conned.
I began to replay events in my head and the one thing that leapt out
to me was Bousquet’s defensive and even dismissive reaction to two
threads I thought were important and newsworthy which I wanted to
write about.
One was the politically sensitive issue of writing objectively about
all the women in the story. There were female victims who had slept
with Wortman, which I though was contextually important in
understanding the larger story. Bousquet had made it clear that he
wasn’t eager for me to write about that. (Be trauma informed!-ed.)
There was also the fact that female police officers were at the
intersection of almost every major event that terrible weekend. The
commanding officer was Leona (Lee) Bergerman. Chief Superintendent
Janis Gray was in charge of the RCMP in Halifax County. Inspector
Dustine Rodier ran the communications centre. It was a long list that
will continue to grow.
I believe in equal pay for work of equal value but that comes with
equal accountability for all. I am gender neutral when evaluating
performance.
But it didn’t take psychic powers to detect that gender politics was a
big issue with Bousquet – his target market, as it were.
I really wanted to write about Banfield. My preliminary research
strongly suggested to me her story was riddled with weakness and
inconsistency, but nobody in the mainstream media would tackle it.
Hell, for months her name wasn’t even published anywhere outside the
pages of Frank magazine.
Bousquet’s position was that Banfield was a victim of domestic
violence and that her story, via vague, second-hand and untested RCMP
statements, was to be believed. No questions asked.
“You’re going to need something really big to convince me otherwise,”
Bousquet said in one of our brief conversations.
Afterward, I did have one face-to-face meeting with him in Halifax. He
actually sat in the back seat of our car because Sharon was in the
front. We met up because I wanted to tell him about sensitive leads I
had which, if pursued, would show that the RCMP had the ability to
manipulate its records and destroy evidence in its PROs reporting
system.
Considering his involvement in the Assoun case, where that very issue
was at the heart of Assoun’s exoneration, I thought Bousquet would be
eager to pursue the story.
As I looked at him in the rearview mirror, I could sense his
discomfort and lack of interest. So could Sharon who was sitting
beside me.
“That was weird,” she said.
Bousquet got out of the car, walked away and disappeared me for good.
It was all so inexplicable. If this was the new journalism that I was
experiencing, there was something terribly wrong with it. I couldn’t
believe that a journalist like Bousquet who aspired to be a
truthteller felt compelled to distill every word or nuance through a
political filter first or even something more nefarious.
Later, while writing for Frank Magazine, I broke story after story
about the case. Incontrovertible documents showing that the RCMP was
destroying evidence in the Wortman case. The Pictou County Public
Safety channel recordings showing for the first time what the RCMP was
doing on the ground during the early morning hours of April 19. The
911 tapes. The Enfield Big Stop videos. That Lisa Banfield lied in
small claims court on two different occasions.
Bousquet either ignored or ridiculed most of those stories in the
Halifax Examiner or on his Twitter feed, as if I were making the
stories up.
For the most part throughout 2021, the Halifax Examiner didn’t even
bother covering the larger story. There was no discernible legwork or
energy being expended on it. And regarding the stories he did publish,
I began to see a pattern. Naïve readers might have thought that he was
digging for new stories when in fact the Examiner was merely mining
court documents and uncritically reporting what resided therein. It
was all stenography, straight from the mouths of the RCMP and the MCC.
Time and time again, “new” stories would be published which were
essentially no different from previous ones but all with the same
theme: as Ray Davies of the Kinks put it in his masterpiece Sunny
Afternoon: “Tales of drunkenness and cruelty.”
The Monster and the Maiden stories, as I called them, reinforced in
readers' minds that Banfield was a helpless victim controlled by a
demonic Wortman, a narrative that, upon reflection, seemed to
perfectly suit Lockyer’s strategy.
For 27 months the RCMP and the Mass Casualty Commission played along,
sheltering Banfield as part of their “trauma-informed” mandate, even
though there was plenty to be skeptical about her story.
Banfield was beside Wortman for 19 years during which he committed
crime after crime. She was reportedly the last person to be with
Wortman and her incredible, hoary tale of escape should have been
enough to raise suspicions about her.
From the moment she knocked on Leon Joudrey’s door she has been
treated as a victim, which to this day astounds law enforcement
experts and others who have monitored the case. Many observers,
including but not limited to lawyers representing the families of the
victims, have serious questions about how Banfield spent the overnight
hours of April 18/19. Not helping matters is that she doesn’t appear
to have been subjected to any level of normal criminal investigation
or evidence gathering. Her clothing wasn’t tested. There were no
gunshot residue tests. She wasn’t subjected to a polygraph or any
other credible investigative procedure.
 Enter James Lockyer of the Innocence Project.

The puppetification of Tim Bousquet

As we moved closer to July 15, the day that Banfield would be
“testifying” at the MCC, it is also important to consider what
Bousquet and his minions were doing at the Halifax Examiner.
In the weeks and days leading up to Banfield’s appearance, the
Examiner’s reporting and Bousquet’s Twitter commentary began to take
on an illogical, more contemptuous and even hostile approach to anyone
who refused to buy into the RCMP and Banfield’s official version of
events.
In a series of hilariously one-sided diatribes, Bousquet lashed out at
Banfield’s critics whom he wouldn’t name. Some (likely us) were
“bad-faith actors.” He decried the “witchification” of Banfield.
He tweeted: “And just to repeat for the 1000th time: I’ve read
transcripts of interviews with dozens of people. I’ve read three
years’ of emails between Banfield and GW. I’ve read her Notes app.
There is ZERO evidence that she had any prior knowledge (of) GW’s
intent to kill people…. The notion that she is ‘complicit’ is pulled
out of people’s diarrhetic asses and plain old-fashioned misogyny.”
Oh, misogyny, that old woke slimeball to be hurled at any male who
dare be critical of any female.
One can’t help but sense the deft hand of a clever and experienced
defence lawyer running up the back of Bousquet’s shirt. That makes
sense.
Look at what has transpired on Lockyer’s watch.
Since April 2020, the RCMP and the federal and provincial governments
have wrapped themselves in a single, vague and inappropriate platitude
– trauma informed.
The original selling point was that this approach would prevent the
surviving family members from being further traumatized by the ongoing
“investigation” into the massacres.
What actually happened is much more sinister.
Lisa Banfield was coddled and protected the entire time not only by
the authorities but also by Lockyer’s friends in the mass media. The
wily old fox had the opportunity to mainline his thoughts into the
Globe and Mail, the Toronto Star, the CBC, CTV and Global News who
unquestioningly lapped it up.
At the MCC, Banfield wasn’t allowed to be cross examined because, as
Mr. Lockyer so eloquently explained, cross examination would just lead
to more conspiracy theories.
That’s rich.
The search for the truth will only confuse matters -- it’s better for
everyone that Banfield spin a much-rehearsed tale without challenge.
That’s clearly a $1,200-an-hour lawyer speaking.
The whole world has gone topsy-turvy. The Mass Casualty Commission,
the federal and provincial governments, the RCMP and Lisa Banfield are
now aligned on one side of the argument.
Meanwhile, the re-traumatized families find themselves agreeing with
this magazine and other skeptics and critics.
The final irony is that the Halifax Examiner bills itself as being
“independent” and “adversarial.” It seems to be neither these days.
In the end, Tim Bousquet’s approach to covering the Nova Scotia
Massacres is, to use his words: “Dead Wrong.”


paulpalango@protonmail.com


Paul Palango is author of the best selling book 22 Murders:
Investigating the massacres, cover-up and obstacles to justice in Nova
Scotia (Random House).




--
Andrew Douglas
Frank Magazine
phone: (902) 420-1668
fax: (902) 423-0281
cell: (902) 221-0386
andrew@frankmagazine.ca
www.frankmagazine.ca




Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

------- Original Message -------
On Sunday, July 17th, 2022 at 9:25 PM, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:


> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pbqoVpBnHQ&ab_channel=NighttimePodcast
>
>
> the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 17, 2022
> 379 watching now
> Started streaming 67 minutes ago
> Nighttime Podcast
> 7.5K subscribers
> Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice memo at
> nighttimepodcast.com/contact
>
> Live chat
>
> nikki lewisShe would have to prove zero negligence to the act
> Anne Marie EvansNighttime, hope you got my voice memo
> nikki lewisBut it’s possible she could claim all
> nikki lewisLol yeah nosy ☺
> BrendanAgreed. Banfield should have been questioned many times as
> should family members of theirs.
> Jmnl1199Did anyone notice Friday , Lisa’s sister the blonde one.
> Would nudge Lisa off and on with some questions
> nikki lewisEvery Damn witness should have given testimony in this sham
> Nosy ScotianWe'll have to compare horror stories sometime Nikki 😁
> Milkshaker69I don’t mean to judge.. but Lisa looks a lot more
> “weathered” than his sisters
> Julia RockJmnl1199 yes.
> Ash Lunnif LB signed any contract like a prenup like she says she did
> then wouldn't that still be ineffect?
> Ash Lunnthen again Wartman supposedly wrote a new will end of march
> 2020, unless that will is faked?
> Bushbaby _627Lisa’s video and some of her answers were word for word
> Christine WFor a person that hasn’t been able to sleep in over two
> years she looked well groomed ? Who’s her team?
> BrendanDid Wort have a will? Would his property be subject to seizure
> by the government?
> Jmnl1199Milkshaker69 yes I noticed she did, booze life she loved with
> him, then her stress after all this for 2 years I would say she is
> wearing it
> Ash Lunnwartman wills, one in oct 2007 and a new one done march 29th
> 2020 just before rampage
> Caper
> Evening folks
> Ryan
> there are 3 Wortman wills plus a prenup
> Chris LeeYa looking a bit like the goalie for the high school dart team lol
> BrendanInteresting, I can't remember if that info was in Paul's book.
> Ryan
> i''ll do a thread in the FB group and twitter if you guys want
> Jmnl1199He signed everything over to her didn’t he? Then she said she
> wanted nothing, changed her mind now wants
> Nosy Scotianshe didn't have her botox done that's all
> Ash Lunn@Ryan I saw in Comms only two listed?
> Caper
> Excellent Ryan thank you
> Nighttime Podcastk, I'm getting voicememo's for @Ryan now!
> Nighttime Podcasthaha
> Ash Lunn@Ryan yes plz, I want to see that, you rock
> wild foxi love you peeps
> Retire Cape Bretonanother performance art piece from palango?
> Ryan
> @Nighttime Podcast better late than never lol
> Anne Marie EvansNighttime-I sent one for Adam but it's best suited
> for Paul, should I send a new one
> Ash LunnI see kiplings statements on MCC the links are not working yet?
> Nighttime Podcastno it's fine @Anne Marie Evans , I will use it np
> nikki lewisyes please do a thread on that @ryan
> Ryan
> @Nighttime Podcast lol what? i thought you meant i called in last minute lol
> Nighttime Podcastno, straight up vm about you
> SMACwas 2 Five Islands Last year camping it was the darkest place
> ever when there was no moon.can't imagine going through the woods on
> hands &knees & not having my knee caps cut several &my hands ripped
> Ryan
> @Nighttime Podcast oh jeez
> SMACthe dead wood alone is very sharp
> Julia RockAnd barefoot @sMAC
> SMACI call Bullsh!t
> Christine WI wished in the reenactment she crawled a bit though the
> woods …. she had a hard time walking
> Ash Lunnur getting famous @Ryan lol
> SMAC@Jmnl1199 I caught the nudges that maureen was giving Lisa...I
> thought that the sister were more upset then she was...she never shed
> a tear
> 2bskorDid the whole route on the way back from Parrsboro today. Even
> stopped at the fire station.
> Lynn MShe was whispering to Maureen as well
> NS44Lisa "Houdini" Banfield.
> Julia RockCopperfield.
> Ash LunnTeflon LuLumon
> Lynn MDB Cooper
> Jmnl1199@smac that’s what I felt as well, then my mind went somewhere
> else. Wonder if she was with him as well on her sister
> 2bskorNo way that was done on a whim. It had to be planned
> Char DayzFrom where I was sitting I didn’t see the nudges. It’s
> probably best I didn’t notice 😡
> Ash Lunn@Char Dayz nudges and whispers answers to lisa from Maureen
> all the first half
> Jmnl1199@char days it was often
> Darrell Currie@2bskor you should have reached out. I would have given
> you the grand tour of where all the bullet holes are.
> Steve TracyWhen does the live stream start?
> Char DayzI guess I was too busy staring at Lisa, totally missed it.
> Lynn MWhatever happened to the caller that called a few times
> @nighttime ? He was an ex cop or something ?
> Patrick PenneyAdam Rodgers says he is one of top lawyers in Canada
> there was a game plan . and to boot no cross examination was free
> money for her lawyer
> Christine WDidn’t care for McDonald’s statements at the end … how
> great a support they are to her … 🤔🤔
> 2bskor@darrell Currie I will next time I go away for the weekend in
> august. Thanks!
> nikki lewisMacdonald needs to crawl back under his rock
> JayPlant pussy willows😜
> Rustyshelterin
> Mizz FoxxLisa used the charges to get out of really testifying and
> she used the presumption of testifying to get out of charges. She
> played the system. Professional victim
> Retire Cape Bretonpalangos performance art
> Robert BrackenI've seldom seen RCMP cruisers on highway 12.
> SMACI get that the silentparolwindow wasput inby GW but hewas very
> meticulous i the details I am sure that he made itfool proofI am sure
> that ther are some criminalsthat would like 2 know how she did that
> Julia RockMizz foxx absolutely.
> Sir Toast IIII drive highway everyday in morning and at night I see
> them all the time
>
> Subscribers-only mode. Messages that appear are from people who
> subscribe to this channel.


Moreau SJ 1.pdf
436K View as HTMLScan and download

 

 

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dwkpTmtCAM

 


the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 24, 2022 - with Paul Palango

252 watching now
Started streaming 109 minutes ago
7.58K subscribers
Paul Palango and I will discuss the unfolding public inquiry into the Nova Scotia Mass Shootings. Advance questions and comments can be submitted by voice memo at nighttimepodcast.com/contact
 
 
 
Subscribers-only mode. Messages that appear are from people who’ve subscribed to this channel for 1 minute or longer.
 
 
Top Chat 
 

Nighttime Podcasthaha
Ken TriolI think her words should stay they may have relevance later on
where the wind blowsvery good show
cyndithanks to the wrench
Nighttime Podcastthe chat isn't archived anyway. no need to have someone here distracting conversation
cyndithanksdoc
RyanGarage has hiding spots if i recall.
ToshI thought Paul was going to reveal a shirt featuring the magic pumpkin at the beginning of this stream 😂
Nighttime Podcastopen lines next
Jmnl1199If HB don’t like our thoughts and opinion, maybe should not be here
Center HiceNever addressing the families to say I m so sorry for your love ones ,but no she was more focused on how it makes her angry ? really ? quite a temper
RyanCBSA paying for anything?
Scott McLeodMaybe HB can sign up and come to the MCC and talk to me about it
Darrell CurrieI'm be there in person watching Campbell and Leather this week. I don't expect to hear anything new from them.
Center HiceExactly, it's evident hb probably is on the wrong show ,or maybe part of mcc 😆 lol
tarnished badgebanfield admits twice gw had a relationship with the police
where the wind blowschillwcat
Kristen StronachI’d like to make it in person sometime
Scott McLeod@Darrell Currie we will have to take lots of notes for next weekend
where the wind blowsyes
Kim Lomaxwhat is Paul's email please ?
where the wind blowsI see it 👁👁😎
Peter BykerPonder the Pumpkin
Laura AJordan you should do a Nighttime-Polango shirt with a Magic pumpkin
Center HiceHe definitely had help ,and was willing to be taken out for the others envolved.
Scott McLeodLMAO
Jmnl1199Lmao
Nighttime Podcastdeff!
where the wind blowsomg 🤣😂🤣
Center HicePaul if she's calling you money grabbing, what about her in seeing?
Nicholas Langilledid she point on " the tree" on her walkabout?
Darrell Currie@Scott McLeod for sure. Maybe some explanations about the RJ for LB!
Ken TriolI like the magic pumpkin we could all have a latte together
where the wind blowsby paul
Woodsfanatic🤣🤣🤣🤣
where the wind blows😂😂
Nicholas Langillepoint out *
Strawberrymochigunnight night
Center Hicethat was suppose to read suing
where the wind blowsnite strawberry
Jmnl1199Did anyone notice when LB was on the stand, her sister kept nudging her during certain times?
Scott McLeod@Darrell Currie for sure
Mamacita 902yup
Lynn MI noticed the nudging and heard them whispering as well@jmnl1199
Jmnl1199Wonder what that was about, remind her of the story. I mean they shared him
Center HiceYeah I noticed her sister doing that while she was on the stand ,but they should nt have been able to go up with her in the first place ! lol real honest inquiry lol 😆
cyndiright!!? @center why and who does that?
Jmnl1199@ Lynn yes, why did they not wonder about that
Darrell Currie@Jmnl1199 that is what prompted the loud verbal exchange between Rob Pineo and the MCC lawyers.
Scott McLeodThe sister in the red dress had hair like Peg Bundy and make up by an undertaker
Center Hiceexactly Cyndy 💯
Mamacita 902omg yes!!! 😅
Ryan@Darrell Currie you don't say!
Lynn MYesssss @scott McLeod 🥸🥸🥸🥸🥸
Ash Lunn@Darrell Currie i suspected that was what set pineo off
Jmnl1199@Darrell Currie yes she did lol
Center HiceThe Mcc should be going out of their way for the victims family s not LB who should be a suspect .
Lynn MAlso @jmnl1199 Lisa looked like she was looking or texting on a phone under the table
Ryan@Nighttime Podcast See @Darrell Currie 's comment's about the lawyer fight?
where the wind blowswasn't very long
Grumpee Chatspiderman vibes
cyndiI lllliiiikkkkeee it
Cheryl Clarkehow are you holding up without your pop @Nighttime
Michael Keefenice @Jordan
Grumpee Chathb is a wingnut
nikki lewisand cbc cuts out the gillian part
Nicholas Langilleand what did maxwell say the mcc doesn't agree with
Mamacita 902HB totally related to LB
Center HiceYeah I wander Jordan ,he could be a spy for the mcc lol 😆
Anne Marie EvansNightime- you still didn't use my voice clip
Kristen StronachDropped the wrench 😂
Patrick PenneyWhat was Lawyer fight about?
Ash Lunn@Nighttime Podcast I thought you had other mods in chat with wrenches too?
nikki lewisthere are plenty of trolls out there, easy to make out to be someone
cyndiwacked by the wrench!!! thanks @ kristen
Center Hice👍 great job 👏 to the wrench s 👏
Ryanwhat was the question again?
Albinono one investigated the Houlton connection
Tosh@ryan where in the states did the ammunition come from?
where the wind blowswhy ask about where ammo was from
Center HiceThe caller s on the 💰 money
Ryangotcha
Patrick Penneysource of the ammo in the US.. manufacturer etc
nikki lewiszero info from MCC on Clayfield connections too
Anne Marie Evansmy question was about Lisa's injuries and how could she run with the supposed injuries she had, sent in as a voice memo
Ryan
we've been working on the CBSA angle. the straw man purchase of a gun in Maine, The Banfield clan buying pistol ammo pre Mass Casualty
Center HiceAnd fit throgh the pexy glass on top of it Ann Marie
Center HiceThat callers right ✅👌 on
Milkshaker69I’d say that they’re not looking into states stuff because it opens up more stuff
Milkshaker69Such as like all the stuff coming over the boarder
Milkshaker69All the stuff they’re purposely ignoring
Nicholas Langillenvm. he says Wortman was driving . they want him to say that Forbes said she complained about him besting Banfield
Anne Marie Evanscenter- yes for sure I'll be calling in
where the wind blowscan u buy it and get it delivered off ebay?
tarnished badgeRyan I have a cbsa name for you to check out he is out of NS private message me
Patrick PenneyGriffin & Leon Joudrey should testify
Michael Keefe@Patrick 100% agree
Center HiceThats the problem Jordan ,your right ✅ I think Rob s info was half truths ,sort a like LB 👍
Nighttime Podcastsound ok?
Patrick Penneyyep
ToshYep
Ash Lunncaller volume is really low
Alex MacLeanWortman claimed in an email to Von Bargen he could've purchased a .50 cal. I got the impression he never did buy it. Did Wortman tell Doucette this story?
Center HiceGood 👍 job Anne Marie 👏
Michael Keefesound is good
Anne Marie Evanssounds perfect
Anne Marie Evansnightime- when are the lines oprn
Anne Marie Evansopen
where the wind blowskids r able to buy arms off Ebay in the states that r underage
cyndirob is a monster and he charmed you in and then he fkd you, and now he gets to hide in the back ground now!
Center HiceExactly 💯 caller
2bskorMy gosh there is no way to remove decals and reuse them. Did you ever take decals off of cars? He worked as a lot attendant
Cheryl Clarkenow @Anne Marie
Ash Lunnwho was the guy in bridgewater they said made decals too?
Anne Marie Evansnumber? to call
2bskorDid griffon mot admit he made the decals yesterday he has never been in the stand. Where the heck is he?
Michael Keefeanyone could cut vinyl decals with products like a Cricut
Center HiceAnd they found a cell # for gw in LB s phone ,so he didn't have a phone bs 🙄 And tells has a record for his #
Patrick Penneyis Griffon MIA?
Ryan@Center Hice they ignored the shit out of that
Patrick PenneyWhere is LEOn still in Portapique?
Center HiceExactly Ryan 💯
2bskorHe was going to either buy or sell a motorcycle to Wortman hence the conversation and phone number.
Cheryl Clarke@Darrell wouldn't mind hearing more about the lawyers
Center HiceWe all need the # for the mcc
cyndiear drum damage for sure
Center HiceExactly 💯 percent caller ,your right ✅👏 And I have that experience from the army
where the wind blowsI used to practice in a basement
Darrell Currie@Cheryl Clarke hoping to call in shortly
Ryan@Center Hice Rob said GW watched his CCTV via the phone. Angel Patterson indicated the police asked her about the phone as well.
where the wind blowsunder pawn shop they stomp on floor if customer came in
Ryanthe shots where in the warehouse i believe
AlbinoGriffon is definitely MIA. and nobody is shooting 50 cal. on Orchard beach .it would be memorable
dollie the warehouse I'm sure
Cheryl Clarke@Darrell 👍😊
Center HiceYup Ryan ,but she totally lied about it
cyndishe said it happened in a few spots , lb changes her story
Ryanwhile trying to put the handcuffs on
where the wind blowsshe would have lost some hearing if some did right by ur ear
SMACin the warehouse she said by the bar
nikki lewisand he agreed to not handcuff the second wrist, yet she had to rip it off?
Center HiceShe had to be led by the officer to alot of the places .
ToshThat was a great series btw
Ryan@nikki lewis zip cuffs would cut into the wrists, found some in debert
Center HiceNo coat found in wood s either
Center HiceHello 👋 Anne Marie
Kristen StronachAnne Marie!!!
Strawberrymochigunlol
cyndihey 🍓
StrawberrymochigunHey Cyndi
Scott McLeod12.5 X11.5
cyndi🤗
Center HiceExactly 💯 Anne Marie ,I cleaned those cars for the r c m p ,and she s not fitting through lol 😆
StrawberrymochigunBeen in a cop car gang hahaha
Marc TrefryWhen I hear that voice, it’s time to say good night.
Jmnl1199Remember she climbed that with broken ribs
Strawberrymochiguncop cars are uncomfy
Jmnl1199I call BS
Center HiceI use to have the contract for hazardous cleaning for the r c m p lol 😆 so I know she s not getting through ,unless she's Hudene
lisa cameronQuestion. Was thaf divider something he made ? Wouldn’t they take that out before they would sell it ?
Becca BScott are you sure it’s only 12.5 inches wide ? Looked as wide as the car seat in the pic
Ryanwhen i called the manufacturer they suggested the partition was built to prevent such an escape. also the sides were blocked of by the b pillars so you couldn't reach around it
Ryan@lisa cameron he bought it, it's police issue
SMACif the glove don't fit... lol
Ash Lunn@lisa cameron wartman bought that divider
Center HiceYes Jordan ,but that's the problem ,how much have the family s have been traumatized 😳
Michael Keefe@Scott...are you Sean McLeod's brother?
Scott McLeod@Michael Keefe I am his brother
where the wind blowsmake up on ?
nikki lewisif a genuine part you would think rcmp would be suing manufacturer for a useless bit of equipment if people can get through it
Center HiceExactly 💯 Anne Marie spot on ,all those points 👉
2bskorMaybe they could fly a lady from Australia to rot through the divider 😜
dollie I thought they said he made the divider
lisa cameronI wass just wondering I thought it may be homemade. You are right why would he skip on anything after the work he did on the outside
Michael KeefeI am so sorry for your loss, and so sorry that the MCC is failing you and the other families
where the wind blowsawe poor kid lots of water
Albinoshe was delivered to Leons by the RCMP Otherwise they would have checked his house and garage.
Center HiceThats what I was saying I know the patitions well from doing their cars .Please get better 🙏 are with you Anne Marie
where the wind blowsyes they should challenge
Ash Lunn@Albino bingo
Granny LindaPrayers for you and your family Anne marie
Patrick PenneyMCC only challenges Family lawyers or members who call BS..3 sleeping puppets
Lynn MLines are hot tonight
Sun Shineany proof LB was even in Portapique that night?
ToshI would think that’s what a “recreation” would be useful for. In all parts of the inquiry
Center HiceGood 👍 job Ryan 👍 you did well ,and your right ,and the mcc s not interested in the truth 😉
What TheHeckNSYes Jordan - all kinds of inconsistencies
where the wind blowsanne marie u did great!
Mamacita 902put LB through a lie detector
lisa cameronI seen them before they didn’t look like that . It was black with a mesh on it plus the glasss or whatever it was plexiglass
Ryanin the defense of the MCC the did supplementary reports on the F150 and and Corrie Ellison death
Stuart Pearce'I smell a Rat" that got out of the back of the Cop Car...
Kristen StronachOh dear
Chris LeeOh man its David. He is something
Patrick Penney@sunshine good point- who can confirm she was there
StrawberrymochigunOh he sounds pissed
Ash Lunnhere, scrunching up paper and throwing it over my shoulder lol
where the wind blowsoh yes to work for le here u sign under federal in the states
Mr. MWhacko
Michael Keefe😑
Ash Lunnhere comes the squirrels looking for a great NUT
nikki lewisperhaps the wrench could be used now?
Nighttime Podcastill give him a sec
Ash Lunn@nikki lewis please
Center HiceGreat job 👏 caller ,your right ✅ on . We just want the truth 😔
Michael Keefenight folks!
KarenCB65What is his point?
Chris LeeThe Riddler live
Lynn MNames holyyyyy
nikki lewisperhaps in voice is more coherent than chat
where the wind blowsnite Michael
Mr. Mnobody cares
Kristen StronachI don’t think I can wrench a caller lol
Nighttime Podcastnight michael
Darrell Currie@Nighttime Podcast I'm not sure all your guest deserve air time, just saying
Ash Lunnanyone have a shovel?
cyndiwrench 🔧 hes as bad as the mcc a
What TheHeckNSProof
cyndidude hiw can you prove that
nikki lewisexactly, give us some new info and facts and proof
Retire Cape BretonIra McCaskill...
Strawberrymochigunhe sounds upset that gw didn't buy a bike from him lol
Kristen StronachLOL bye bye
Center HiceI agree 👍, it as clear as day that gw was working with r c m p ,caller David spot 👌 on.
StrawberrymochigunLOL
cyndihahah strawberry 🍓
Cheryl Clarke👍😊
beckyalegraYay ..someone coherent
Center HiceHello 👋 Scott and friend
Retire Cape BretonI trust all the ppl you guys write off
Center HiceGod bless you the family 👪🙏 members of the 23 .
Kristen StronachHey Scott and Darrell!
Cheryl Clarke@nighttime ask about the lawyers please
KarenCB65Question for nighttimers..... I don’t think I’m delusional about this lol but can anyone remember a video that was on YouTube earlier on with witnesses of the shooting at Enfield? continued down belo
Center HiceAnd Darrell
cyndithey were worth our money
nikki lewisi think they know what they are doing, how could tye write such a complex report within weeks of the event, thats was part of their story/narrative
Patrick PenneyDoes Darryl or Scott know why Pinoe Freak out?
nikki lewisshould have hired thouse ladies to actually do it if they wanted truth - the mass sham i mean
Ash Lunn@Scott McLeod &@Darrell Currie careful the rcmp are likely recording your call tonight lmao
KarenCB65It sounded like 2 younger guys watching the shooting of Wortman and one guy was saying let’s get out of here bc they can’t catch us with all this money?
Center HiceWe really need one of the lawyers to stand up in inquiry ,and state how are we suppose to do our job ,and cross examination. ✝
nikki lewismcc trying to save face imo
Becca BCan’t believe how long they let that lawyer question them for , was hours. The girls killed it
Becca B He was brutal
What TheHeckNS@Nighttime Podcast please ask why participants lawyers did no submissions on Friday??
Ash Lunn@Scott McLeod don't tell me you believe Boe Forbes over retired officer Maxwell? Say it isn't so man.
Center HiceThe Mcc along for the ride to make sure the truth doesn't come ,God help their souls ,theirs blood on their hands.
Becca BHe remembered exactly where the cars were parked though in wortmans driveway
AlbinoYeah what's wrong with these lawyers nothing to lose everything to gain. speak out!
ToshGood night all and Nighttime. Keep up the good work.
nikki lewisround peg square hole
Center HiceBut unfortunately Brenda Forbes is a attention seeker ,a witness running off hear say ,and didn't witness anything . She just wants her moment of fame .
Center HiceThe Lawyers need to put the Mcc on the Johnny
Center HiceLive
NS44karen i know that video
Lynn MWhispering as well
What TheHeckNSThey were
What TheHeckNSUnder the table
Ash Lunnmaureen was whispering her answers and interfering
nikki lewismaureen more than janice
Center HiceHer sisters on the stand with her Give me a break?
nikki lewisv odd dynamics when you read statements
nikki lewiscbc cut loads out
Ash Lunncncn bought and pid for $300K thy got
Table Six@nikki lewis : agree - extremely odd dynamics considering LB is a grown woman!
Ash Lunn*CBC
What TheHeckNSMaureen knew it all
Center HiceBecause cbc is owned by the government Nikkie
What TheHeckNSShes the head of the family
RyanMaureen get gas money for helping with the Brinks run?
Ash Lunnlol
cyndiAmazon beast she is
Center HiceLol Ryan 😆 I think sisters get a million for gas ⛽ fund lol 😆
Jmnl1199Yes and she slept with GW
What TheHeckNSI would totally do it for my sister
nikki lewishas a 6mth time gap on sneakers too it seems
nikki lewis@how do you know that @Jmnl1199 ?
What TheHeckNSBS @Jmnl1199
Ken TriolI was wondering how they knew that as well about Maureen
Center HiceYour ✅ right Scott ,I can tell you being in that r c m p building with the white shirts ,crooked as hell ,I feel bad for some of the good officers .
Jmnl1199LB was very aware they were, it was about the money
What TheHeckNSThat’s BS
Center Hicelol Darrell 😆
Ken Triolif that's true about them both doing that with Gabe it just makes the story get a whole lot more creepy
What TheHeckNSWheres your proof
nikki lewishearsay unless anything to offer
KarenCB65Darrell, you weren’t offered Victim Services? That’s absolutely ludicrous
Jmnl1199@ centre HIce million for gas 😂🤣
where the wind blowswas fun
Cheryl Clarkethanks for calling in guys 😊
cyndimaybe Maureen abuses all the family lol
Center HiceI thought you like 👍👌 that million gas ⛽ lol
Mamacita 902Thanks Scott and Darrell
Ken TriolMaureen actually seemed more upset than Lisa on some levels
What TheHeckNSThanks for calling in Scott and Darrell
Center HiceCyndy which ones Maureen 🤔
KarenCB65NS 44 can you tell me how to find it again?
Cheryl Clarkeboth awesome gentleman
Kristen StronachThey seem fantastic. Night all!
where the wind blowsthanks enjoyed
BrendanThanks Jordan. Always appreciated and interesting.
Mamacita 902they need their own show lol

 

 

 

 

https://www.ottawalife.com/article/investigative-reporter-and-author-paul-palango-says-rcmp-destroyed-evidence-in-nova-scotia-shootings 

 

Investigative reporter and author Paul Palango says RCMP memo points to destruction of evidence in Nova Scotia shootings

Investigative reporter and author Paul Palango says RCMP memo points to destruction of evidence in Nova Scotia shootings

Editor’s note:

On April 18–19, 2020, Gabriel Wortman committed multiple shootings and set fires at 16 locations in the Nova Scotia, killing 22 people and injuring three others before he was shot and killed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) in Enfield. The attacks are the deadliest rampage in Canadian history, exceeding the 1989 École Polytechnique massacre in Montreal, where 14 women were killed. On May 1, in the wake of the attacks, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, following through on a 2019 campaign promise, announced an immediate ban on some 1,500 makes and models of "military-grade assault-style" weapons, including the types used in the attacks. For part of the 13-hour crime spree, Wortman impersonated a police officer by driving a replica RCMP car and wearing a RCMP uniform. 

Wortman obtained several firearms illegally without a possession and acquisition licence. On December 4, three people, including Wortman's spouse, were charged with supplying him with ammunition later used in the attacks.

During the incident, the RCMP failed use the Alert Ready to warn the public about the attacks, as well as not responding to reports of Wortman's behaviour and previous acts of domestic violence. An investigation into law enforcement's response to the rampage, including the decision not to use Alert Ready, is underway. A public inquiry into the law enforcement response was declared on July 28 following escalating criticism of the investigation's lack of transparency.

Paul Palango is a former national editor of The Globe and Mail responsible for investigative reporting. He  has written three books on the RCMP. Ottawa Life Magazine will publish Palango’s articles on matters related to the shootings and the conduct of the RCMP before, during and after the incident.

Palango believes the Mountie’s are hiding “explosive” information relating to the gunman’s case.

He questions why the RCMP have issued an internal order to stop destroying evidence in the case, which is illegal and further brings into question the very competency of the RCMP itself. It should be noted that Palango’s reporting comes less than two weeks after a scathing report on sexual harassment in the RCMP by former Supreme Court of Canada Justice Michel Bastarache  found that at least 130 women in the RCMP had been raped by other officers. 


MONTHS TOO LATE?
RCMP orders moratorium on Wortman evidence destruction in October

By Paul Palango

The RCMP issued an order seven weeks ago to its members involved in the investigation in the Nova Scotia massacres to stop destroying evidence in the case, according to internal RCMP documents obtained by Frank magazine.

The trigger for the moratorium on destruction of evidence appears to be a Canada Labour Code investigation undertaken byEmployment and Social Development Canada into the matter.

The four-page document is dated October 15, 2020. It appears to come from an internal RCMP web page and is headlined: “MD-218 – Moratorium on the destruction of information involving Gabriel Wortman pertaining to the investigation of the mass shooting in Nova Scotia on 2020-04-18 and 2020-04-19”. The URL for the web page is: http://infoweb.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/manuals-mauels/national/moratorium-moratoire/md-218 (Editors note: the URL is no longer working).

The last bit of information is missing from the photocopy.

The four-page document is dated October 15, 2020. It appears to come from an internal RCMP web page and is headlined: “MD-218 – Moratorium on the destruction of information involving Gabriel Wortman pertaining to the investigation of the mass shooting in Nova Scotia on 2020-04-18 and 2020-04-19”

The document first was sent anonymously to Little Grey Cells, aYou Tube channel, which operates out of Alberta. The show’s host, Seamus Gorman, has been discussing it for the past few days in his broadcasts as part of a group called The Discord. It is comprised of 380 citizen investigators who have banded together since the massacre to dig up information.

The timing and wording of the memorandum strongly suggests that the RCMP has been destroying documents and data in the case. Since May, multiple anonymous sources close to the investigation have suggested the RCMP was destroying or altering paper and electronic evidence. This has previously been reported in the Halifax Examiner and on the Halifax talk show hosted by Rick Howe. The RCMP has not commented on the allegations to date.

The order commands the RCMP to collect, protect and retain every kind of evidence in the case, including paper documents, electronic data, 911 calls and radio communications.

To date the RCMP has resisted releasing any information or answering any questions about what it did and didn’t do before, during and after the shootings on April 18 and 19.

In the new documents the RCMP is ordered to collect and retain “all records, documents, and information pertaining to communications and dealings with Gabriel Wortman, and all occurrences linked or related to Gabriel Wortman, including intelligence reports, citizen reports, calls for service and occurrence reports.”

The RCMP has been told to collect and retain “all occurrence reports, briefing notes, SITreps, taskings and regular members’ notes of the incidents, including notes or regular members who responded from ‘H’ Division,” which is Nova Scotia.

The directive makes it clear that a focus of the investigation is the murder by Wortman of Constable Heidi Stevenson and the shooting of Constable Chad Morrison near Shubenacadie on April 19. Although Wortman had already killed 19 people before he got to Shubenacadie that Sunday morning, Stevenson and Morrison were travelling alone in their marked cruisers when they each came upon Wortman.

The protection order applies to “All medical, employment and training files of Const. Heidi Stevenson, Const. Chad Morrison and other individuals injured or involved.”

In the past there have been unproven allegations that Stevenson had some sort of conflict with a superior in her previous post at Cole Harbour and had been transferred to Enfield, north of Halifax Airport, shortly before her death.

After the shooting of three Mounties in Moncton onJune 4, 2014, a Canada Labour Code investigation found the RCMP liable and a judge later fined the force $540,000. Among other things, the RCMP was blamed for its lax supervision, poor communications and inadequate training and equipment. The murdered officers were virtual sitting ducks for killer Justin Bourque who was armed with a high-powered rifle. Prior to the shootings the RCMP had promised to upgrade weaponry for police but did not. After the fine was issued, the force provided Colt C-8 rifles, an upgrade to the AR-15 semi-automatic, to its patrol officers.

In recent months, a current RCMP member has been quoted on numerous occasions in the Halifax Examiner and elsewhere as saying that the RCMP was attempting to “pasteurize” the evidence in the case. The member said there are ways the force can alter electronic files and data, "or even make it disappear.”

Another current member said in an interview that the biggest problem from a public interest point of view is that the RCMP data management system, known by its acronym PROS, can be manipulated by senior officers.

“There has never been an audit conducted on the integrity of data in the PROS system,” the ranking officer said. “The force has had six months to play with the evidence. Now, these investigators aren’t going to take ‘the dog ate my homework’ for an answer. They will demand answers to their questions.”

A third former RCMP officer who is familiar with the current inner workings of the force said this in an interview: “This is the nightmare for the force that I’ve been expecting. They have been doing everything they can to hide information. They have likely trying to scrub the database to get rid of anything incriminating.”

Among the issues that are potentially embarrassing for the force:

  • The chain of command that weekend. Did the RCMP follow its rules and procedures manual?
  • The lack of a public alert. Who made that decision? Why?
  • The fact that only a handful of Mounties were assigned to the original crime scene. There are almost 1,000 RCMP officers in the province in various capacities. Were they called out? If not, why not? If so, how many refused to attend?
  • Why were nearby municipal police forces in Truro, Amherst, and Halifax, among others, not called in for assistance or adequately warned about the dangers?
  • Why did the RCMP call for help from the New Brunswick RCMP when it had clearly not exhausted all its resources in Nova Scotia?
  • Why did the RCMP not employ a helicopter in its search and containment efforts?
  • The possible relationship between Wortman and the RCMP, or other police forces associated with the RCMP. Was he or anyone in his circle a confidential informant, police agent or auxiliary police?

All these questions and more are being asked as part of the Labour Code investigation. The RCMP has appointed Erika Lathem in the Criminal Operations office at the force’s Nova Scotia headquarters as co-ordinator for all information.

Detailed questions put to the RCMP this morning, which have thus far gone unanswered, include:

  • Why would the publication of a document such as this be necessary at all? Would it generally be regular practice for the RCMP to destroy evidence related to the largest mass-shooting in Canadian history?
  • If the publication of such a document was necessary, why would it be published at such a late date, six months after the mass-shooting incident?
  • Was any evidence relating to Gabriel Wortman and the mass-shooting ordered destroyed prior to October 15/20? If so, why, and who gave the orders?
  • To your knowledge, was any evidence inadvertently or mistakenly destroyed prior to October 15/20?
  • To your knowledge, how much evidence will not be able to be presented at the inquiry or in the various lawsuits, or in the Labour Code investigation because it has been destroyed, either inadvertently or on purpose?

Paul can be reached at his secure and encrypted email address: paulpalango@ protonmail.com.

 

A Little New Years Eve Deja Vu for Trump, Trudeau, RCMP, FBI, CBC, CTV Frank Magazine, Vice Magazine, Feminists, the Ghosts the Queens Crook Tim Richardson and his buddy the Evil Fat Bastard of Edmonton commonly known as Mr Baconfat




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fraser, David"<david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 14:53:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: [EXTERNAL] Re: A Little New Years Eve Deja
Vu for Trump, Trudeau, RCMP, FBI, CBC, CTV Frank Magazine, Vice
Magazine, Feminists, the Ghosts the Queens Crook Tim Richardson and
his buddy the Evil Fat Bastard of Edmonton commonly known as...
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I'm out of the office from Wednesday to Monday and will have limited
access to email.

If your email requires a response before I return, please contact my
colleague Sarah Anderson Dykema at sarah.dykema@mcinnescooper.com.

Thanks!


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 11:51:59 -0300
Subject: Re: A Little New Years Eve Deja Vu for Trump, Trudeau, RCMP,
FBI, CBC, CTV Frank Magazine, Vice Magazine, Feminists, the Ghosts the
Queens Crook Tim Richardson and his buddy the Evil Fat Bastard of
Edmonton commonly known as Mr Baconfat
To: dan.ahlstrand@news957.com, Todd.Veinotte@rci.rogers.com,
paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>,
Vanessa.vandeNes@rci.rogers.com, meghan@halifax.citynews.ca,
news@halifax.citynews.ca, kelly@mdwlaw.ca, tara@mdwlaw.ca
Cc: andrew@frankmagazine.ca, andrewjdouglas@gmail.com,
nsinvestigators@gmail.com, tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
prmibullrun@gmail.com, "Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, "elizabeth.mcmillan"
<elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca>, "lisa.mayor"<lisa.mayor@cbc.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "justmin@gov.ns.ca"
<justmin@gov.ns.ca>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Mad
Ape <chiefape@gmail.com>, "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, Jon
Blanchard <dexterdyne@gmail.com>, aparish@burchells.ca, "greg.church"
<greg.church@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, eps@edmontonpolice.ca, calgarypolice
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, Ob Wor <obscene.works@gmail.com>, msegal
<msegal@murraysegal.com>, David Fraser
<david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>, jpink <jpink@pinklarkin.com>,
"premier@gov.ns.ca"<premier@gov.ns.ca>, Glen Canning
<grcanning@gmail.com>, michael@frankmagazine.ca,
blake@frankmagazine.ca, comment@contrarian.ca, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Glen Muise
<glenmuise1000@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca, smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca,
Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, JUSTWEB
<JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, news957 <news957@rogers.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, zach@halifaxexaminer.ca,
premier@gnb.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>

https://archive.org/details/RogersTalkshowBuffoons

 Rogers Talkshow Buffoons

by    David Raymond Amos


Topics   RCMP, FBI

Andy Baby Kyrstal and Tommy Boy Young ain't got nothing on this mean
old Maritimer


Todd Veinotte
Reporter

Todd Veinotte joins Global News New Brunswick as a veteran reporter
with more than 20 years in the media.

He has worked in print, radio and television and held many positions
including; reporter, anchor, news director and producer.

Todd has hosted a regional radio talk show for four years (The Todd
Veinotte Show) which was heard throughout the Maritimes including
Saint John, Moncton and Halifax.

He also helped produce a twice-weekly podcast for three years as well,
primarily talk-show format covering everything and anything.

Todd is based out of Saint John.


Dan Ahlstrand

The news business has certainly taken Dan to places all over the
country. After spending part of his life in the Canadian Armed Forces,
Dan graduated from Confederation College’s radio and television
program and took his first gig in the paper-making town of Dryden,
Ontario. From there it was to Thunder Bay for a stint at Dougall Media
and then off to Owen Sound and Bayshore Broadcasting. When Rogers
Media decided to launch three news-talk stations in Atlantic Canada,
Dan jumped at the opportunity. First at an anchor at News 91.9 in
Moncton, then as the host of The Drive with Dan Ahlstrand and then The
New Brunswick Morning News. Dan is now the news director at CityNews
95.7 and co-anchors All News Mornings on each weekday morning from 6
a.m. to 10 a.m. When not working away in the newsroom you can find Dan
chasing a trout on a stream, watching his beloved Everton on the
pitch, or quietly hoping that Toronto will find a way to win the
Stanley Cup.

Email   dan.ahlstrand@news957.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1azdNWbF3A&t=183s&ab_channel=DavidAmos

Me,Myself and I
383 views
Apr 2, 2013
David Amos
45 subscribers


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ca6Egqghmw&ab_channel=DavidAmos

Tom Young
91 views
Dec 12, 2012
David Amos
45 subscribers



..

https://halifax.citynews.ca/local-news/andrew-krystal-former-citynews-halifax-talk-show-host-dies-5397615

Andrew Krystal, former CityNews Halifax talk show host, dies
Krystal was the first host of Maritime Morning when News 95.7 launched in 2005
Dan Ahlstrand Dan Ahlstrand
May 23, 2022 9:45 AM

andrew krystal
Andrew KrystalTwitter/@andrewkrystal
Listen to this article
00:01:12

Andrew Krystal has passed away.

The former Halifax radio talk show host died Sunday in Toronto.

Krystal started his broadcast career in Toronto before moving to
Halifax to help launch what was News 95.7 in 2005.

He and Maritime Morning became a very popular part of the fledgling
station as his beloved "Krystal Nation" grew.

Krystal joined The Todd Veinotte Show in November of 2020, where he
discussed his role as a talk show host.

"We approach journalism, but we're not journalists. Ultimately we are
entertainers," he stated. "I do the best I can. You don't go on and be
mean to everybody, but you can't go on always kissing up, there has to
be a range."

"You're compassionate, you're aggressive, you're understanding, you're
insightful. Hopefully you're prepared, you're intelligent and you're
well read. Those are important things."

In July of 2010, Krystal left Halifax and returned to Toronto where he
was heard on Sportsnet The Fan 590 and seen on CityNews Toronto.

From there he continued in talk radio with a show on SiriusXM, and
also formed his own communications company.

Funeral details have not yet been released.



https://halifax.citynews.ca/nova-scotia-news/families-of-ns-mass-shooting-victims-end-boycott-will-return-to-inquiry-hearings-5441145

Families of N.S. mass shooting victims end boycott, will return to
inquiry hearings

HALIFAX — Lawyers representing the relatives of the 22 people murdered
in the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting will retake their seats at next
week's mass casualty commission hearings, but they say their clients'
lack of confidence in the process remai
Lyndsay Armstrong, The Canadian Press
Jun 3, 2022 5:15 PM

20220603150620-629a5efc09798d52d0ddf247jpeg
Tara Miller, a lawyer who represents family members of Aaron Tuck and
Kristen Beaton, addresses the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into
the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax
on Thursday, March 3, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan

HALIFAX — Lawyers representing the relatives of the 22 people murdered
in the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting will retake their seats at next
week's mass casualty commission hearings, but they say their clients'
lack of confidence in the process remains.

Tara Miller, a lawyer representing the family of two victims, said in
an interview Friday she will return to the public hearings beginning
Monday, but “our return next week is by no means an endorsement of the
decision made by the commissioners,” who prevented cross-examination
of key Mountie witnesses.

Last week, lawyers representing the majority of the 22 victims’
families boycotted the commission proceedings at the direction of
their clients. This was in response to the decision to prevent the
families’ lawyers from directly questioning Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill
and Sgt. Andy O’Brien.

“They’ve lost confidence,” Miller said. “While the lawyers will be
there next week, I’m not sure what clients will be there."

The commission said they agreed to allow the two witnesses to avoid
being cross-examined and to testify through video instead of in person
due to the officers' unspecified health concerns. In response, the
families of victims took to the streets last week in protest.

Patterson Law, which represents 14 of 22 families, said in a statement
last week that their clients are "disheartened and further
traumatized" by the commission's decision. Patterson Law lawyer
Michael Scott said in an email Friday his team will attend public
proceedings next week.

Miller said that on May 30, she told the commission she planned to
table a motion amending the rules so family participants can question
witnesses directly. She said she is waiting to hear back from the
commission. The motion, she explained, is critical toward restoring
confidence in the commission process for the victims’ families.

Many key RCMP witnesses have yet to testify at the hearing, Miller
said, adding that all should be cross-examined.

“The deep concern from my clients and other families as I understand
it, is that we will see this again,” she said.

Emily Hill, senior counsel for the mass casualty commission, told
reporters Friday it’s possible the commission will grant further
accommodations to witnesses that would allow them to avoid being
cross-examined or testifying in person. But she said no further
requests for accommodations have been made so far.

“At this point we haven’t received any other requests … but if we
receive them, then we have to consider them,” she said.

“Family lawyers have been permitted to ask questions of almost every
witness,” she said, and some questions asked in the recorded testimony
came from families’ counsel.

Miller, however, said she was able to submit written questions to
commission counsel, which she said does not equate to adequate
questioning of witnesses. “It’s misleading for them to suggest that
the ability to ask questions has been allowed."

“What we’re advocating for is appropriate cross-examination, which is
materially different than asking questions, putting them in writing
and giving them to commission counsel to ask in place of us doing it
ourselves with the appropriate followup,” Miller said.

Wayne MacKay, a professor emeritus at the Dalhousie University law
school in Halifax, says it seems there was a lack of communication
between the Mass Casualty Commission and the public about why the
decision was made to exempt two senior RCMP officers from being
cross-examined.

"I realize there is … personal health information that has to be
respected. But even with that, the families have walked out with their
lawyers for part of it,” he said in a recent interview.

“Surely, there needed to be a more fully developed and thoughtful
communication about that whole process,” he added.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 3, 2022.

— With files from Michael MacDonald in Halifax.

---

This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Meta and
Canadian Press News Fellowship.

Lyndsay Armstrong, The Canadian Press


https://www.mdwlaw.ca/lawyers/tara-miller/

 Tara Miller, Q.C.
Partner: Personal Injury Lawyer

tara@mdwlaw.ca

Phone: 902.422.5881

Toll Free: 1.844.956.9833

Kelly Dion, Paralegal
kelly@mdwlaw.ca


Tara is the “M” in MDW Law. A proactive and well-respected litigator
with a reputation of being firm but fair, she joined MDW Law as a
partner in May 2015 and is the leader of the firm’s personal injury
and insurance litigation practice group. She received her Queen’s
Counsel designation in 2019.

Originally from beautiful but cold Labrador, she sought the warmth of
Nova Scotia to attend university and begin a civil litigation practice
at a large Atlantic regional law firm.  She then honed her litigation
skills practicing insurance defence litigation exclusively in-house
for a national insurance company. She now uses her almost 25 years of
knowledge and experience to help clients injured in motor vehicle and
other accidents receive fair and timely settlements. She also
regularly provides advice and representation in other insurance
litigation matters.

Tara was drawn to a personal injury practice after a close family
member was in a significant accident.  She understands the emotional
toll on individuals and families dealing with the aftermath of an
unexpected injury or tragedy. While she does not hesitate to take
matters to trial when necessary, she believes alternative dispute
resolution leading to early settlement is in every client’s best
interest as the best results for most are achieved outside of the
adversarial court process. She has a wealth of experience in
negotiation, mediation and alternative dispute resolution. Her
experience also includes representing Personal Representatives of
deceased family members in the Desmond Fatality Inquiry under the
Fatality Investigations Act.

Outside of the office, Tara is an active and engaged volunteer in her
community.  She is a longstanding provincial Board member and Chair of
Special Olympics Nova Scotia.  She is the Past President of the PC
Party of Nova Scotia, after serving for 3 years as Party President.
In the legal community, she is a board member of the Lawyers Insurance
Association of NS and a member (and past executive member) of the
national CBA Women Lawyers Forum.  She is the former Chair of the Fine
Arts Parents Association.

Like her clients, Tara is passionate about her own family.  The mother
of two active teenagers (and a small but mighty dog), she is in charge
of clean laundry, timely transportation and short order meal
preparation!  She also spends a fair amount of time in soccer fields
and hockey rinks watching QMJHL games.  She spends some of her spare
time on a yoga mat, at her life long family cottage on the North
Shore, in running sneakers or working from a cookbook in the kitchen
with a glass of wine in hand.


PC Party Executive

    Share

Table Officers

    President: David Bond
    Executive Vice President:
    Secretary: Morris MacLeod
    Treasurer: Peter Orser
    Past President: Julie Chaisson
    Vice President (Policy): Rob Shea
    Vice President (Organization): Stephen Taylor
    PCNS Fund Chair: Chris Lydon
    Provincial Director: Penny Morash (non-voting)

Ex-Officio Members

    Leader: Tim Houston
    Young PC President: Tristan Shaw
    Women’s Caucus: Nicole Mosher

District Vice-Presidents

District 1
Glace Bay-Dominion, Cape Breton-Whitney Pier, and Sydney-Membertou
Todd McDougall

District 2
Victoria-The Lakes, Northside-Westmount, and Cape Breton East
Rob Andrews

District 3
Inverness, Richmond, and Guysborough-Tracadie
Barry Landry

District 4
Pictou Centre, Pictou West, Pictou East, and Antigonish
Hilton Moore

District 5
Cumberland North, Cumberland South, Colchester North,
Truro-Bible Hill-Millbrook-Salmon River, and Colchester-Musquodoboit Valley
Andy Smith

District 6
Hants East, Waverly-Fall River-Beaver Bank, Sackville-Uniacke,
Sackville-Cobequid, and Hammonds Plains-Lucasville
David Borden

District 7
Bedford Basin, Bedford South, Timberlea-Prospect, Clayton Park West,
and Fairview-Clayton Park
Jim Hanifen

District 8
Halifax Atlantic, Halifax Armdale, Halifax Chebucto, Halifax Needham,
and Halifax Citadel-Sable Island
Mike Salterio

District 9
Dartmouth North, Dartmouth East, Dartmouth South, and Eastern Passage
Rhonda Vickers

District 10
Cole Harbour-Dartmouth, Cole Harbour, Preston, and Eastern Shore
Lisa Bonang

District 11
Chester-St. Margaret's, Lunenburg, Lunenburg West, Queens, and Shelburne
Evelyn Snyder

District 12
Argyle, Yarmouth, Clare, and Digby-Annapolis
Marc Blinn

District 13
Annapolis, Kings West, Kings North, Kings South, and Hants West
Eric Meisner
Members At Large

    George Laird
    Darren McFadgen
    Marlene Smith
    Sue Uhren

Committee Chairs & Other Ex-Officio

    National Council – Nova Scotia: Rob Batherson
    2022 Annual Meeting Co-Chairs: Ryan Sharpe & Sarah McInnes
    Constitution: George White
    4PC Operations: Cheryl Newcombe
    Communications Chair: Mark Boudreau
    Membership: Jackie King
    Diverse Communities: Betty Thomas
    Code of Conduct Committee Co-Chairs: Adam Grant & Sarah McInnes

Management Committee Members

    Julie Chaisson
    Tim Houston
    David Bond
    Peter Orser
    Morris MacLeod
    David MacGregor
    Chris Lydon
    Rob Shea
    Stephen Taylor
    Barry Landry
    Andy Smith

Past Presidents

    Ms. Julie Chaisson, February 2019 – February 2021
    Ms. Tara Miller, February 2016 – February 2019
    Ms. Janet Fryday Dorey, February 2012 – February 2016
    Mr. Robert Batherson, November 2009 – February 2012
    Mr. Scott Armstrong, February 2006- November 2009
    Mr. John MacDonell, February 2004- February 2006
    Mr. Grant Galbraith, February 2002- February 2004
    Ms. Heather Foley Melvin, April 2000 –  February 2002
    Mr. Tom Jarmyn, February 1999 – April 2000
    The late Mr. Stephen Mont, February 1996 – February 1999
    Hon. Alfie MacLeod, October 1994 – February 1996
    Mr. Jim White, February 1994 – October 1994
    The late Mr. Jim Connors, February 1993 – February 1994
    Mr. Blair Mitchell, November 1991 – February 1993
    Mrs. Irene Swindells, February 1988 – November 1991
    The late Mr. John Abbass, January 1985 – February 1988
    The late Miss. Helen Gillis, February 1983 – January 1985
    The late Mr. John Grant
    The late Mrs. Sylivia Isenor
    Mr. Gordon Tidman
    Hon. Angus MacIsaac
    Mr. Walter Goodfellow
    The late Mr. Maurice Flemming
    The late Hon. Finlay MacDonald
    The late Rt. Hon. Robert L. Stanfield
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:33:24 -0400
Subject: Fwd: A Little New Years Eve Deja Vu for Trump, Trudeau, RCMP,
FBI, CBC, CTV Frank Magazine, Vice Magazine, Feminists, the Ghosts the
Queens Crook Tim Richardson and his buddy the Evil Fat Bastard of
Edmonton commonly known as Mr Baconfat
To: NightTimePodcast@gmail.com, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

https://www.nighttimepodcast.com/episodes/nova-scotia-rampage-8

the Nova Scotia Rampage - Part 8 - Is it Fair to Question the RCMP?

https://globalnews.ca/author/nighttime/

The Nighttime Podcast
Suite 110
103-287 Lacewood Drive
Halifax, NS  B3M3Y7

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 17:17:03 -0400
Subject: A Little New Years Eve Deja Vu for Trump, Trudeau, RCMP, FBI,
CBC, CTV Frank Magazine, Vice Magazine, Feminists, the Ghosts the
Queens Crook Tim Richardson and his buddy the Evil Fat Bastard of
Edmonton commonly known as Mr Baconfat
To: andrew@frankmagazine.ca, andrewjdouglas@gmail.com,
nsinvestigators@gmail.com, tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
prmibullrun@gmail.com, "Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, "elizabeth.mcmillan"
<elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca>, "lisa.mayor"<lisa.mayor@cbc.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "justmin@gov.ns.ca"
<justmin@gov.ns.ca>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Mad
Ape <chiefape@gmail.com>, "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, Jon
Blanchard <dexterdyne@gmail.com>, aparish@burchells.ca, "greg.church"
<greg.church@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, eps@edmontonpolice.ca, calgarypolice
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, Ob Wor <obscene.works@gmail.com>, msegal
<msegal@murraysegal.com>, David Fraser
<david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>, jpink <jpink@pinklarkin.com>,
"premier@gov.ns.ca"<premier@gov.ns.ca>, Glen Canning
<grcanning@gmail.com>, michael@frankmagazine.ca,
blake@frankmagazine.ca, comment@contrarian.ca, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Glen Muise
<glenmuise1000@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca, smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca,
Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, JUSTWEB
<JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, news957 <news957@rogers.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
zach@halifaxexaminer.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier
<scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/nobody-safe-from-edmonton-blogger-charged-with-hate-crime-1.4161015

'Nobody was safe from it': Edmonton blogger charged with rare hate
crime targeted individuals across Canada

Police say Barry Winters, 62, made derogatory remarks about race,
gender, politics
Roberta Bell · CBC News · Posted: Jun 14, 2017 5:38 PM MT

Edmonton police Sgt. Gary Willits of the hate crimes unit said the
investigation into blog posts targeting numerous individuals took more
than a year.  (Scott Neufeld/CBC)

Blogs that led to a rare charge of promoting hatred were more extreme
than anything he's ever seen before, says an Edmonton police
investigator.

"I've never seen such extreme hatred from an individual," said
Edmonton police Sgt. Gary Willits. "He just kept spewing and nobody
was safe from it.

"He literally in some of these blogs was saying to kill people."

After an investigation of more than a year, Edmonton police confirmed
Wednesday a CBC News report a day earlier that revealed Barry Winters,
62, was charged with wilful promotion of hatred on a blog called The
Baconfat Papers and other blogs between 2014 and 2016. But police say
there's reason to believe the posts date back at least two years
earlier.

Copies of the blog submitted for evidence by one of many complainants
in the case show the blogger repeatedly made derogatory comments about
numerous individuals across the country, including a number of
well-known politicians and LGBTQ advocates in Edmonton.

The remarks don't exclusively target one particular group, but focus
on various factors, including race, gender, sexual orientation and
culture. Others attack individual politicians in various levels of
government.

Willits said it's possible some people still don't know they were
targeted in the blog posts.

Glenn Canning, based in Toronto, said there were dozens of posts on
Winters' blog between 2014 and 2016 about his daughter, Rehtaeh
Parsons. She committed suicide after she was sexually abused by a
group of teenage boys at a party in Halifax in 2013.

Canning said he discovered his daughter and his family were the
subject of the blog posts after someone contacted him and told him
about them.

It just broke my bloody heart in half to read that.

- Rehtaeh Parsons 's father Glen Canning

The blogs that focused on Rehtaeh were "just disgusting and sick," Canning said.

"It just broke my bloody heart in half to read that. It was cruel and
it is even crueller to know that the guy did it for no other reason
than he enjoyed hurting somebody."

Canning said he was in touch with police over the past year after they
opened the investigation. He's glad police have finally laid a charge.

"I've cried over this," Canning said. "When it happens to you over a
very personal thing, it affects you pretty badly."

Marni Panas, an Edmonton-based LGBTQ advocate, said she was appalled
when she stumbled across posts on a blog suggesting she move to a
country where transgender women, like herself, are persecuted.

You don't know who's on the other end of these keyboards.

- Marni Panas


"You don't know who's on the other end of these keyboards.You don't
know what they're capable of and that instills a real fear," said
Panas, who notified police in 2016.

Panas said she has experienced online hateful comments before, but
said it stood out that the blogger in this instance was from the same
city.

She said she'd never met the the blogger, to her knowledge, but
wondered what would happen if she did.

Willits said police began the investigation in early 2016, after they
received complaints about the blog posts. Collecting the evidence was
time-consuming and complicated, he said, because patterns of hatred,
threats and harm had to be documented meticulously.

Willits said stating an opinion, a personal dislike, of something or
someone, is not the same as "intruding on others" and "uttering
threats."

The charge Winters faces is rare. Alberta Justice said in an email
that province-wide, that type of charge has only been laid on three
other occasions since 2011.

Edmonton police had to seek approval from the attorney general to
charge the blogger, who police say had a growing following numbering
into the thousands.

The posts were filled with derogatory words and "dehumanized scorn"
toward people and identifiable groups, Willits said.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/barry-winters-kris-wells-lgbtq-edmonton-hate-charges-1.4201914

Professor hopeful hate-crime charge will deter others, despite death of accused

'Of course, it’s tragic when anyone passes away and very said, I
think, in this case,' LGBTQ advocate says
CBC News · Posted: Jul 12, 2017 3:45 PM MT

A rare hate-crimes court case in Edmonton is over but the complainants
may not have the kind of closure they were hoping for.

The man charged with wilful promotion of hatred for offensive language
he used on his blog, The Baconfat Papers, died of a stroke July 4, one
of the complainants confirmed Wednesday.

The Edmonton police hate crimes unit charged Barry Winters this spring
after receiving complaints about his blog from LGBTQ advocates,
including Kris Wells, the faculty director of the University of
Alberta's Institute for Sexual Minority Studies and Services.


•Edmonton police charge blogger with hate crime against prof
•​'Nobody was safe from it': Edmonton blogger charged with rare hate crime
•Rise in reported hate crimes in Alberta no surprise to many

"Of course, it's tragic when anyone passes away and very sad, I think,
in this case," Wells told CBC News.


"I don't think there's any resolution," Wells said. "This person
hasn't been held accountable; only in the sense of karma, perhaps, if
you believe in that — the universe taking care of things on its own
terms."

Even though there will be no court hearing or decision, Wells is
hopeful the nature of the charge will act as a deterrent to others
using racist, homophobic or sexist language.

"When you cross that line from free speech to hate speech, there will
be consequences. That's probably the most important message out of
these charges."


Wells said he was shocked at the "hateful and horrific nature of the
comments," when he read Winters's blog over two years ago. Wells was
one of several people targeted with violent threats.


"I'm used to lots of issues being directed my way because of the work
that I do and in the LGBTQ community, but this really was beyond any
bounds of acceptability."


Wells acknowledged that the threshold is high for police to lay
hate-crime charges, but he's hoping more people will report to police
if they suspect someone's behaviour falls under that part of the
Criminal Code.

Wells said only one in 10 hate crimes is reported in Canada.

Statistics Canada data show the rate of hate crimes in Alberta rose 39
per cent in 2015, compared to a five-per-cent rise nationally.

The Alberta Justice and Solicitor General office said the charge
against Winters will be stayed before Aug. 4, which was to be
Winters's next court appearance.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:49:52 -0700
Subject: Re the many Webpages of Frank Magazine, Vice Magazine,
Feminists, Philip Rose, Glen Canning, Dean Roger Ray, Patty Baby Doran
and the Mindless Evil Fat Bastard in Edmoton commonly known as Mr
Baconfat
To: "rod.knecht"<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
, sunrayzulu
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "scott.macrae"<scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Rhansen <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>,
pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, blake <blake@frankmagazine.ca>,
bourdap <bourdap@halifax.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jesse
<jesse@jessebrown.ca>, sean <sean@canadalandshow.com>,
"Stephen.Horsman"<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "danny.copp"
<danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, macklamoureux@gmail.com, Cindy Bruneau
<Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
"don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, themayor
<themayor@calgary.ca>, woodsideb <woodsideb@fredericton.ca>, deanr0032
<deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes"<Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
bluelightning 03 <bluelightning_03@hotmail.com>
, smcintyre
<smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, mgorman <mgorman@herald.ca>,
"selena.ross@cbc.ca"<selena.ross@cbc.ca>, michael@frankmagazine.ca,
mikegormanhfx@gmail.com, meghan@feministcurrent.com,
christopherrowe@gmail.com, philiprose123@gmail.com, "Kevin.leahy"
<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, "Staples, David (Edm
Journal)"<dstaples@edmontonjournal.com>
, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>,
"joshua.skurnik"<joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, "macpherson.don"
<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
acampbell@ctv.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, cblatchford
<cblatchford@postmedia.com>

I hope by now Mack Lamoureux has figured out that I am NOT Mr Baconfat
and that he has checked the malevolent blog close enough to see what a
liar Mr Baconfat has proven himself to be.

First lets quote one of his latest blogs

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/vice-canada-amos-canning-and-that-evil-bastards-blog/

"Since that bombastic threat NO media has contacted me until now, and
Mr. Lamoureux freelancing for an obscure “on-line” sort of alternative
“news” magazine VICE Canada, two galaxies over in the “cyber-space
universe” called referring to me as “David” and hounded me with three
or four e mails for an “interview.” Its  gratifying to know that Mr.
Canning has finally been successful in his cries for media assistance
in dealing with me, that evil bastard, and that blog in the “outer
reaches of the cyber-space universe."

"NO media has contacted me until now"

YEA RIGHT???

Following that "little epsitle" Mr Bconfat posted a YouTube of his
butt buddy Patty Baby Doran.

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/glen-canning-exposed/

To relieve yourselves of boredon perhaps everybody and the
"journalists" amongst you in particular should fast forward to 28
minutes and 30 sec and freeze fames as you read two emails between Mr
Baconfat and Frank Magazine last year from last year. DUHHH???

Kinda easy to see that your old blogging buddy Mr Baconfat is a
Monumental Liar with a very poor memory kinda like you N'esy pas
Chucky Leblanc? Like you Mr Baconfat deletes his blogs once a Faux Pas
has been exposed which is why I must save his words and yours EH
Chucky Baby?

However there is much more that the VICE dudes should enjoy. It proves
that the arseholes within CBC, CTV, Global, the Herald, the Irving
Empire and Frank Magazine etc have known about Glen Canning and Mr
Baconfat's questionable actions all along. But this recent news should
have embarassed the Hell out the RCMP and their boss Mr Harper. Yet
nobody gave a damn Eh Kevin Leahy

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/child-porn-policing-program-suffers-from-rcmp-underspending-1.2963885

There is a lot more to be found within the following link. If you read
you will see I explained this to Frank Magazine et al in great detail
last year so there is no need to be redundant.

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/yo-mr-baconfat-folks-have-to-pay-to.html

Here is just a taste so the that evil bastard Mr Baconfat can eat his
own words and hopefully choke on them..

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/glen-cannings-insane-jihad-against-us.html

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Glen Canning's Insane Jihad Against Us Infidels!

Glen Canning and his ex wife Leah Parsons have been waging a
relentless Jihad of sort against anyone that does not buy the "family
Parsons /Canning " propaganda about the life and martyrdom of "Saint
Rehtaeh of Parsons." Glen and Leah's Jihad against myself and others
has taken strange turn in the last few weeks. A few short weeks ago
seemingly one of the parents of the principles of the Rehtaeh Parsons
tragedy emailed me to complain the "antics of Leah Parsons and Glen
Canning." Glen Canning sent 7 emails and six obscene hate filled
epistles to my blog comments. Also Gen Canning made a threatening and
harassing telephone call to my wife's place of employment. And today
things got "curiouser and curiouser" when Mike Gorman of Halifax's
Frank Magazine emailed some questions for me, as he is reporting about
the Rehtaeh Parsons" media circus of the last year or so. Is Mr.
Gorman a mere shill for Glen Canning?

One of the questions Mr. Gorman posed to me was, "was I going to
defend myself and launch a lawsuit. After I answered his query, it
occurred to me that "those four boys" vilified, slandered, outted by
anonymous, Team Parsons / Canning, and the Feministas, would have a
very good case to litigate against all of these parties. These lads
were never charged with a crime, never convicted, their identities
protected by law, were abused, exposed, threatened, and their lives
ruined by a "lynch mob" fomented and directed by Glen Canning and Leah
Parsons using social media.. It seems to me these people have been
grievously wronged and injured by the Canning, Parsons duo and are
entitled to considerable legal remedy. Glen Canning and Leah Parsons
ought to pay recompense to the collateral damage victims of their
"Holy War."

Mr. Gorman was entirely ignorant of "Rehtaeh's Law, that deals with
cyber-bullying, harassment by posting, and distributing humiliating,
and or naked pictures on social media. The behavior that some say
drove poor Rehtaeh to suicide is now illegal. The ignorant Mr. Gorman
wondered what effect would Rehaeh's Father "suing" me under Rehteah's
Law would have on me. "Rehtaeh's Law is a CC of C section. So Mr.
Canning has no input in the laying of such charges. I further educated
Mr Gorman, that no one can "cyber-bully" Rehtaeh Parsons because she
is dead as a Mackeral. There are no naked or pornographic pictures of
Rehtaeh, nor of Mr. Glen Canning for that matter, if he is considering
saying he is a victim of a miscreant violating Rehtaeh's Law. In fact
I haven't harassed, bullied, sent unsolicited email, or communicated
with anyone. I write a blog. A blog Glen Canning frequently visits and
reads very much on his volition.

Glen Canning and his ex wife Leah Parsons have been impersonating
people on the world wide web, harassing them, and threatening them,
because there is money to be made being "poor victims. And they would
NOT want or let anyone jeopardize that. Mr. Canning has NO legal
options, recourse, or means to shut me or others up.

That's game, set and match, Glen!

Posted by Seren at 1:35 PM

Hence VICE Magazine has every chance in the world to set the record
straight. EH Jesse Brown and Chucky Leblanc?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:26:22 -0700
Subject: Whilst Chucky Leblanc was having a little pow wow with Jesse
Baby Brown in Fat Fred City his old blogging butt buddy the Very Evil
Bastard Mr Baconfat of Edmonton was busy typing his latest epistle
about Vice Magazine, Glen Canning and Mean Old Me
To: Jeff.Callaway@wildrose.ca, David.Price@wildrose.ca,
finance@wildrose.ca, "Heather.Forsyth"
<Heather.Forsyth@assembly.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
"Raj.Sherman"<Raj.Sherman@assembly.ab.ca>, Rachel Notley
<Rachel.Notley@assembly.ab.ca>
, "greg.clark@albertaparty.ca"
<greg.clark@albertaparty.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
, ed <ed@wildrose.ca>,
highwood@assembly.ab.ca, joe.anglin@assembly.ab.ca, "Danielle.Smith"
<Danielle.Smith@assembly.ab.ca
>, shennig@taxpayer.com,
SHutton@stikeman.com, LacLaBiche.StPaul.TwoHills@assembly.ab.ca,
brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, Shayne.Saskiw@assembly.ab.ca, sunrayzulu
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "rod.knecht"<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
,
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Rhansen
<Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
, macklamoureux
<macklamoureux@gmail.com>, Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, jesse
<jesse@jessebrown.ca>, sean <sean@canadalandshow.com>,
"Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Leanne.Fitch"
<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>

Which blog will get more hits?  Survey Says?

http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.ca/2015/02/jesse-brown-from-canadaland-is.html

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/vice-canada-amos-canning-and-that-evil-bastards-blog/

Better yet does anyone even care?



That said perhaps Mr Lamoureux should finally sprout some balls and
answer my emails or at least pick up the phone and give me call. Most
folks know that I find it very offensive to be thought of as the evil
Mr Baconfat  EH Cindy Buneau and Rod Knecht?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/attn-sidney-powell-et-al-i-just-called.html


Saturday, 26 December 2020
ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in Texas and many
of your associates within the Dec 11th filings

---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:07:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:08:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>




---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:11:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:07:53 -0400
Subject: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in
Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
To: info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com,
tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach
<bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
news <news@dailygleaner.com>, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>, Nathalie
Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, tracy@uncoverdc.com
Cc: James@jamesfetzer.com, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, editor@americanthinker.com,
jeromecorsi6554 <jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com>, susan@susanbradford.org


 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNv-DoZ-6Dk&feature=emb_title

Patrick Byrne dropping MOABS exclusively on SteelTruth
•Streamed live on Dec 22, 2020
Ann Vandersteel
SteelTruth Weeknights 9pm ET


SteelTruth™

(561) 320-2464
P.O. Box 3074
Tequesta, FL 33469
tips@steeltruth.com
media@steeltruth.com


Press Inquires: press@deepcapture.com or phone (480) 692-9336

At the time much of the content on DeepCapture.com was written, the
Great Financial Crisis of 2008 was either on the verge of happening or
had just occurred. In those days, emotions among this publication’s
contributors were raw and, in an effort to get their warnings noticed
and appropriate blame placed, occasionally hyperbolic language and
shocking imagery were employed. Were we to write these entries today,
a different tone would prevail.

Yet, being a record of a pivotal time in our global economic history,
we’ve decided to leave the rawness unedited, with the proviso that
readers take the context of the creation of certain posts into
account, and that those easily offended re-consider the decision to
read them.

https://radioinfluence.com/2020/12/21/dark-to-light-a-meeting-with-the-president/


Dark To Light: A Meeting With The President
Radio Influence Staff
December 21, 2020
3

Patrick Byrne joins us today for a passionate conversation about his
meeting with the President of the United States. There isn’t a need
for many show notes.

If there was ever an episode of the show you need to share with your
friends and family, this is it.

Follow Tracy Beanz on Twitter, subscribe to her YouTube channel, and
check out her newest venture, UncoverDC.com!

Follow Frank on Twitter, subscribe to his YouTube channel, and follow
his solo podcast, Quite Frankly!
Subscribe to Dark To Light With Frank & Beanz on Apple Podcasts,
Stitcher, TuneIn Radio, Google Play, the iHeartRadio app, and now on
Spotify!


YO Jimmy Fetzer we talked again today after 16 very long years Correct?

https://jamesfetzer.com/

James H. Fetzer
Legal Defense Fund
800 Violet Lane
Oregon, WI   53575
(608) 835-2707
James@JamesFetzer.com


Now say Hey to the Yankee lawyer in Hells Kitchen Mikey Leron who
calls himself  "Lionel" in Youtue and other so called free thinkers
then go figure why I am so pissed off

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_M4lTc5sLw&t=7s&ab_channel=GiuseppeVafanculoNeedtoKnow%3ATheFetzerReport


Need to Know: The Fetzer Report World Premiere
•Streamed live on Sep 3, 2020
Giuseppe Vafanculo Need to Know: The Fetzer Report
The first episode Special Report Features Professor Jim Fetzer along
with commentators Giuseppe Vafanculo from Revolution Radio and Susan
Bradford Author & Muckraking Journalist


http://susanbradford.org/about.php

Susan was lead investigative journalist in the Abramoff investigation,
exposing the machinations of the Deep State within Indian Country and
Bob Mueller's partisan prosecution of Republican superlobbyist Jack
Abramoff and the executives of Enron. She has broken a number of
stories that have been picked up by ABC News and other national media.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uudM2hYNgSgv/


Jim Fetzer

2211 subscribers

Need to Know Episode 93 (23 December 2020) with Giuseppe Vafanculo and
David Scorpio. Whistleblower shares witnessing traitorous betrayal of
Trump at Friday night White House Meeting. Trump appoints Sidney
Powell Special Counsel, traitors in White House block her entry. Jenna
Ellis calls out traitor Barr. Pence lets down Trump again. More and
more election fraud revealed. Some GOP Congressmen will challenge
electoral fraud on House floor. Trump threatens to veto stimulus bill
unless direct payments upped to $2,000. Drunken Pelosi parties
maskless with no social distancing--traitorous HYPOCRITE! 5 key
elements to scamdemic. Who finally admits most PCR tests reveal
nothing but the common cold. 3,150 MRNA ejection recipients sickened
enough to require hospitalization. 50% of US States plan to deny White
People the MRNA quackccination. Russian scientist who worked on COVID
quackccine stabbed, falls out of window (another suicide). Netanyahu
government collapses, 4th Israeli election in 2 years



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beTDI9WggNY&t=1346s&ab_channel=LionelNation

America the Unrecognizable
9,600 views
Streamed live on Dec 23, 2020
Lionel Nation


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lionel Media <info@lionelmedia.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:16:31 +0000
Subject: The New Lionel Nation Channel
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Remember what it was like to think dangerously? When expression and
thought weren't throttled. When we questioned everything.


** “Censorship reflects society’s lack of confidence in itself. It is
a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.” – Potter Stewart
------------------------------
------------------------------
View this email in your browser
(https://us14.campaign-archive.com/?e=4dcb13a46e&u=aaca0d56ddaf02ef4aa46f516&id=04990bcd04)

Here’s the news. I’ve a new channel. A new platform. A new paid
subscription membership
(https://lionelmedia.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) . It’s
not on any social media platform. It’s LionelMedia
(https://lionelmedia.com/) . New and improved. Remember when thinking
was dangerous and unregulated? You know. Freedom of speech. Freedom of
thought, expression, belief. Unfettered, unencumbered, unplugged.
Remember? Sounds too good to be true. But it’s happening. Here
(https://lionelmedia.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) .
Countering the deep state, police state, intel state, shadow
government and ruling class #BigTech fascists. Ahem.

My story. Tuesday morning, 11 September 2001 CE. Redpilled. Big time.
Everything changed for me and I haven’t been the same since. I was in
NYC and couldn’t believe what I was seeing. And then I couldn’t
believe what I was reading and seeing on TV. But the truth was online.
This was before social media and Twatter, Fecesbook and that other
thing. It was Wild West Internet. The theories and hypotheses were
exploding. Many daft, many deranged and many spot-on and deadly
accurate. Perfect. We were called Truthers. Translation: People who
didn’t believe the official account (for a variety of reasons).
Imagine that, derided for wanting the truth. And it was fun and cool
and dangerous. And great.

But wait, there’s more. If you want to question vaccine safety
especially as to kids and you’re not RFK Jr. with Kennedy immunity,
you’re an Anti-Vaxxer and you’re off social media. Remember in 2016
when tough guy wannabe and overrated actor Bobby De Niro dared to
screen “Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe”? Seems that tough guy
Bobby got whacked and backed down. As the NYT reported
(https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/movies/robert-de-niro-pulls-anti-vaccine-documentary-from-tribeca-film-festival.html)
: “Facing a storm of criticism over its plan to show a documentary
about the widely debunked link between vaccines and autism, the
Tribeca Film Festival on Saturday pulled the film from its schedule
next month.” Did you catch that? Widely debunked link between vaccines
and autism. You’d better say it’s debunked or you’ll go the way of
Jenny McCarthy. Who? (Precisely.)

I said there was more. Doubt that UBL was dispatched in a gun battle
in Abbottabad and tossed into the drink à la Luca Brasi with not one
single morgue shot available and question the seemingly endless
passels of ex-Navy SEALs who swear they single-handedly plugged Osama
bin Forgotten, you’re a Deather. Ditto for questioning Saddam’s phone
cam dispatch. Unsure as to Barry O’s provenance (and you can think
Hillary C for that one), you’re a Birther (and a racist). Think that
masks don’t work (as Fauci said repeatedly) other than to steam up
glasses and perpetuate the culture of anonymity, you’re a Masker. (OK,
I made that one up). Bottom line, if you don’t regurgitate the pap,
the story line, you’re on your own. And for most folks they couldn’t
care less. Just let them pose half nude in front of a bathroom mirror
or perseverate the illusion and fantasy of hotness via beauty app and
they’re fine. That’s the way it works. Addict folks to social media
and then demand that they abide by the
rules of insipidity or lose their exhibitionist license. Sorry,
Sparky, not for me.

Then, it all changed. After social media hooked everyone with an
unlimited narcissism stage it changed the rules. Don’t talk at all of
the aforementioned or anything about hydroxychloroquine, stolen
elections, Biden’s profligate son, China, geoengineering, the
conspiracy theory du jour, pro-Trump ideations, “hate speech” and any
of the forbidden phobias or Poof! Off you go. Be gone. Demonetization,
shadow-banning, prohibition in toto, suspension, exceptions, labeling,
cautionary warnings. Systematic destruction of random and erstwhile
protected thought. You will be relegated and exiled in social media
Elba.

I need my own platform. I'm being second-guessed, sanctioned,
penalized, throttled, demonetized. And for what exactly? Especially
now with a spate of ex-Mafia made channels regaling you with lurid
tales of hits and murder and "the life." (Whither omertà?) That’s OK.
But dare to discuss COVID therapeutics and you’re Elvis. Sorry. Look,
there’s nothing wrong with making money from the dissemination of
opinion and analysis. We’re capitalists, after all. (That’s still
legal. Right, AOC?) I want to say what I want and share it with the
world for comments and reactions and reasonable pecuniary support.
It’s what I’ve been doing professionally for 33 years inter alia.
Heritage MSM news platforms are dead. Shock jocks are dinosaurs.
Nothing shocks anymore. Other than the level of censorship. The only
thing available of any informational truth value is citizen/civilian,
alternative and foreign media. And this.

Our mailing address is:

Lionel Media
The Lebron Firm
745 5th Avenue, 5th Floor
New York, New York 10151


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/overstocks_colorful_founder_has_tales_to_tell_about_the_russia_hoax.html

December 23, 2020
Overstock's colorful founder has tales to tell about the Russia hoax
By Andrea Widburg

Patrick Byrne, Overstock's founder, has long suspected that Obama set
up a police intelligence state that's been calling the shots in
American politics since 2015.  On Sunday, he pushed back against those
of Trump's legal advisers demanding surrender.  On Tuesday, he claimed
that Obama had blackmailed Hillary Clinton to own her politically.  If
that's true, what Byrne is saying can upend the American political
scene.

The New Yorker profiled Byrne early in December.  Sheelah Kolhatkar,
who wrote the profile, thinks Byrne is probably as crazy as John
McAfee, with both given over to life-destroying conspiracy theories.
Kolhatkar plays fair, though, and cannot deny his brilliance.

    Former employees describe a memory trick he likes to perform, in
which he studies a deck of cards for a few minutes and then recites
back the order of the cards, one by one. "When he's on, he's smart,
charming, complex, and brilliant," Marc Cohodes, who was once a critic
of Overstock and is now an investor in the company, told me.

While Byrne may be eccentric, he's often right.  He was the first to
realize that investment firms and stock traders were colluding to
drive stock prices down.  He was accused of being paranoid, but the
financial crisis proved he was correct.  Additionally, while Byrne's
tales about his adventures sound like fiction, that doesn't mean they
are:

    David Luban, a professor of law at Georgetown University who has
known Byrne since teaching him as an undergraduate, observed that
improbable things seem to happen to Byrne with remarkable frequency.
"He's a hard man to bet against," Luban said. "So many of his stories
that have seemed utterly incredible turn out to be true."

Byrne's biggest adventure was his relationship with Maria Butina, who
was later convicted of acting as an unregistered Russian foreign
agent.  When she approached him, he was worried enough to report that
fact to the FBI and was surprised when the Fibbies were unconcerned.
Throughout their one-and-a-half-year affair, Byrne kept the FBI
apprised.

Eventually, Byrne decided that the FBI were the baddies, and were
setting up Butina, who was arrested in July 2018:

    By then, Byrne's suspicions about the F.B.I. had crystallized into
a belief that he had been part of a plot by high-ranking members of
the Obama Administration to commit political espionage, in an attempt
to control the next President.

Byrne also claims that the Obama administration planned the Russia
hoax as early as 2015:

    According to the government's version of events, the F.B.I. opened
Crossfire Hurricane, its investigation into possible ties between the
Trump campaign and the Russian government, on July 31, 2016, after it
found out that the Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos had told
an Australian diplomat that he'd heard that Russians had compromising
information about Hillary Clinton. Byrne claims that it all really
started a year earlier, when the F.B.I. became aware of his
relationship with Butina.

We know that the government's account — that they opened the
investigation on July 31, 2016 — is a lie.  A July 28, 2016 Peter
Strzok text to Lisa Page refers to already open counter-intelligence
investigations.  Moreover, Clinton and the DNC had hired Fusion GPS in
April 2016 to investigate Trump's alleged Russian ties.  Byrne thinks
Strzok was an architect of the Russia hoax and used Byrne's
relationship with Butina to further it.

Strzok denies all knowledge of Bryne and Butina.  As a reminder, this is Strzok:

Peter Strzok's creepy smirks freak out Twitter audience

On Sunday, Bryne spoke about a meeting in the Oval Office and claimed
that Trump's legal advisers are betraying him by urging him not to
fight massive election fraud:

Now Byrne has gone on record to say that he was part of a 2015 sting
operation that saw Hillary accept multi-million-dollar bribes from
foreign governments.  Byrne thought the sting was to reveal Hillary's
criminality, only to discover that it was to give Obama a hold over
her when (as everyone assumed) she entered the White House.  You can
see the video clip here in which Byrne explains that Obama had used
the Deep State to set up a blackmail operation.

The big question is whether Byrne is a fabulist, whose utterances we
should ignore — or is he, instead, a brilliant, successful, connected,
often prescient man who's currently a voice in the wilderness and
should be taken very seriously?  I don't have an answer for that, but
his statements seem consistent with what we know about Hillary's
corruption and the Obama Deep State, including the FBI.

Image: Patrick Byrne Interview with Ann Vandersteel.  YouTube screen grab.

Staff
Editor and Publisher    —       Thomas Lifson
Deputy Editor   —       J.R. Dunn
Deputy Editor   —       Drew Belsky
Deputy Editor, Graphics consultant
(i.e., drop Manager, Social Media)      —       Monica Showalter
Deputy Editor   —       Andrea Widburg
Co-founders     —       Richard Baehr, Ed Lasky



Those were your latest videos now enjoy one mine from 2007 published a
full year before the RCMP falsely arrested me after the FBI had
arrested the Yankee Goveno Spitzer in Washington
Obviously (I reloaded It in this YouTube Channel after Google bought
YouTube and maliciously deleted my old faithful account)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVGHg0jlVWk&ab_channel=MaritimeMalaise

RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
1,586 views
Oct 9, 2010
MaritimeMalaise


Below is a true copy of my latest email It was sent today to Sidney
Powell byway of her webpage format The lawyers found below will get
regular email just like I have done with you people (I already called
them all and spoke to some and left messages with the rest)


Perhaps all you lawyers should check my work from years ago and call
me back  ASAP???

https://www.scribd.com/doc/265620671/Cross-Border-Txt


On 12/13/20, Pam Stavropoulos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
> Thank you David!
>
> Really appreciate wide dissemination of these concerns as you clearly
> recognise.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pam S.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Raymond Amos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au>
> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2020 2:16 PM
> To: pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au
> Subject: Contact Form submission from
> http://pamstavropoulos.com.au/contact/
>
> Sender's name: David Raymond Amos
> E-mail: David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com
> Phone: 506 434 8433
>
> Message: ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 23:14:01 -0400
> Subject: ATTN Yanis Varoufakis and Pam Stavropoulos I just tweeted about
> your concerns about Julian Assange and global economy etc
> To: y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
> Cc: motomaniac333
>
> Yanis Varoufakis
> Web Site:
>     https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu
> Email:
>     y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
> Address:
>     Parliament Mansion (Megaro Voulis), GR10021
> Athens / Tel. +30 2103707568 / Fax +30 2103707570.
>
> Check out the attachment for USA litigation over 18 years ago
>
>
> Please notice that the webcasts and transcripts of this hearing went
> missing not long  before the economy crashed in 2008 Find the letter
> fom Spitzer to me on page 12 within the document I offer as
> "Integrity-Yea-Right" and ask yourself why Assaage has never metioned
> me In fact I bet that you folks won't either
>
> https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
>
>  Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
> Mutual Fund Industry
>
> Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003
>
> Witness Panel 1
>
>     Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>     Director - Division of Enforcement
>     Securities and Exchange Commission
>           Cutler - November 20, 2003
>     Mr. Robert Glauber
>     Chairman and CEO
>     National Association of Securities Dealers
>           Glauber - November 20, 2003
>     Eliot Spitzer
>     Attorney General
>     State of New York
>           Spitzer - November 20, 2003
>
>
>
> Yanis Varoufakis
> @yanisvaroufakis
> ·
>
> Law and Disorder: The case of Julian Assange - DiEM25
> The conviction of Julian Assange would signify a new dystopian
> landscape in which all investigative journalism risks prosecution.
> diem25.org
>
> David Raymond Amos
> @DavidRaymondAm1
> ·
> 1h
> Perhaps you and I should have a long talk ASAP?
>
> FYI this old pdf file is the tip of the iceberg of things that Bolton
> and Assange have known about yours truly for many years
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>
> David Raymond Amos
> @DavidRaymondAm1
> ·
> 41m
> The first link I offer in the blog Greece is among the many that
> received hundreds of documents byway of registered US Mail as I
> returned home to run for public office 6 more times while suing the
> Queen
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>
> Notice Assange and Trumps lawyer's email before they became famous?
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>
> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
> first email I ever sent you
> To: David Amos
>
> dear Dave
> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
> find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime
>
> thank you for bearing with me
> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>
> with oceans of joy
> birgitta
>
> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
> not.
>
> Andre Gide
>
> Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
> http://this.is/birgittahttp://joyb.blogspot.com -
> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>
>>>> From: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>>
>>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>>
>>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>>
>>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>>
>>>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> To: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G"Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
>>>> something
>>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>>
>>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>
>>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>>
>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Dear David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>>> office.
>>>>
>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
>>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>>
>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>>
>>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>>> waits attendance.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
>>>> Hafnarstræti 15
>>>> 101 Reykjavík
>>>> Iceland
>>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
>>>> +354-540-3600
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>
> Wednesday, 2 August 2017
>
> Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting
> with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the United Nations,
> This was the pdf file attached to the email found below
>
> https://www.scribd.com/document/332928056/UN-DUDES
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MAY, Theresa"theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32
> 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador
> to the United Nations,
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> If your email is to the Prime Minister, please re-send to the No 10
> website:
> www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>
> http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>
>
> If you are a constituent of the Prime Minister, please re-send to:
> sharkeyj@parliament.uk
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
> recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
> copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
> but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
> encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:16 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki
> Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the
> United Nations,
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
> Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au
,
> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
> "CNN.Viewer.Communications.
Management" , news-tips , lionel
> Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
> elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
> oldmaison , andre
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Michael Cohen
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
> called and left a message for you
> To: David Amos
>
> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
> directed to 646-853-0114.
> ______________________________
__
> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
> electronic signature under applicable law.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
>
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
> Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
> T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
> To: David Amos
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> ------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:33 +0000
Subject: RE: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000
Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Original message ----------
From: "B English (MIN)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:29 +0000
Subject: Automated response from the office of Hon Bill English
To: David Amos

Thank you for your email to the Prime Minister.

This is an automated response.

Please be assured that any matters you raise in your email will be
noted; however, not all messages will receive an individual response.

Yours sincerely
The Office of the Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: PmInvites
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:50 +0000
Subject: PM Invites
To: David Amos

Thank you for your invitation/meeting request to the Prime Minister,
the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP.
Your invitation will be considered in light of the Prime Minister's
existing commitments.
We will be in touch with you as soon as possible to formally advise
the progress of your invitation/meeting request.

Yours sincerely

Prime Minister's Office

______________________________
________________________________________

IMPORTANT: This message, and any attachments to it, contains information
that is confidential and may also be the subject of legal professional or
other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
must not review, copy, disseminate or disclose its contents to any other
party or take action in reliance of any material contained within it. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return email informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of the
message from your computer system.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Turnbull, Malcolm (MP)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President
Donald J. Trump I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen
(646-853-0114) Why does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

***Please be advised that this email address is no longer in use***

Thank you for taking the time to write to me. Feedback from the people
we represent is always extremely valuable for members of parliament,
and especially valuable to me as Prime Minister.

However as you can imagine I receive a very large, sometimes
dauntingly large, amount of correspondence and it is important that we
do everything we can to respond to it as quickly and effectively as
possible.

So to help us best direct your enquiry and respond to it, please
complete this contact form. If you have written a detailed message in
your email, just cut and paste it into the contact form and complete
the details requested.

If you would like to invite me or Lucy to an event, please forward the
invitation to pminvites@pmc.gov.au.

If you are a Wentworth constituent, please make us aware of this and
my electorate office team in Edgecliff will be in touch.

Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull
Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
"CNN.Viewer.Communications.
Management" , news-tips , lionel
Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
oldmaison , andre


> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
> andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Merci ,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>>  Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I.                    Introduction
>>>
>>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III.               Issue
>>>
>>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV.              Analysis
>>>
>>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V.                 Conclusion
>>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>

 


MCC - DAY 56 - SUPERINTENDENT DARREN CAMPBELL

$
0
0

 

 https://www.country94.ca/2022/07/25/lucki-and-blair-deny-allegations-of-political-interference-in-n-s-mass-shooting-investigation/

 

Lucki and Blair deny allegations of political interference in N.S. mass shooting investigation

Saint John, NB, Canada / Country 94
Lucki and Blair deny allegations of political interference in N.S. mass shooting investigation

Royal Canadian Mounted Police Commissioner Brenda Lucki. (SOURCE: CPAC)

A strong denial on Monday of any political interference by the Liberal government in the Nova Scotia mass shooting investigation.

The House of Commons standing committee on public safety and national security heard from RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki and former Public Safety Minister Bill Blair on Monday.

Committee members are searching for answers regarding whether or not there was government pressure to release the details to the public on the guns used in the 13-hour rampage that began in Portapique on April 18th, 2020. Twenty-two lives were lost.

Bill Blair, a former police officer and chief, remained steadfast in his belief that at no time was there any political pressure.

“I’ll reiterate that at no time did I cross that line. I did not direct the commissioner of the RCMP and I did not have any private conversation with her in which that was done,” Blair says. “The commissioner did not promise me that she would do this. I think the commissioner understood her job, and her job was to serve the people of Canada and the people of Nova Scotia, to give them information that they desperately needed and wanted with respect to the terrible tragedy that had taken place there.”

Former Public Safety Minister Bill Blair. (Source: CPAC)

The allegations surfaced last month when handwritten notes penned by RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell during an April 28th meeting with Lucki were released in a report published by the mass casualty commission.

The notes indicated Lucki was upset the details were not included in a press conference citing a “promise” made to the Prime Minister’s Office and Blair, ahead of the Liberal government’s impending gun control legislation.

Cumberland/Colchester MP Dr. Stephen Ellis, who is the Conservative shadow minister for public safety and member of the committee, says the goal of today’s meeting is to get answers.

“All of this leads us to believe that there are back-room deals, and a lack of political integrity from the Liberal government on how they deal with the RCMP,” says Ellis.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has also denied the allegations. Blair was moved to the Emergency Preparedness portfolio last October.

“I want to be very clear. I did not direct the RCMP. I did not direct them in their operations or in their communications,” Blair says.

RCMP cruisers parked in front of Portapique Beach Road during the NS mass shooting that claimed 22 lives in April 2020.

Meantime, Lucki says there was, of course, pressure given it was the worst mass shooting in Canada’s history. She says there was also frustration over the media reporting details before police regarding the number of fatalities and even the background of the perpetrator, for example.

She explained that did not mean there was interference on a political level.

“First of all, there was pressure for every single bit of information related to this incident, the number of deceased, where the deceased were located, who the deceased were, the background of the deceased, the perpetrator, the background of the perpetrator, the perpetrator’s common-law spouse … it went on and on,” Lucki says. “It was relentless, especially from the media.”

She was questioned on why in the days after the mass shooting she pivoted from not wanting details on the firearms to be released due to the active nature of the investigation to calling for the information to be made public. Lucki says it was due to the fact that the details were changing rapidly, even hourly, when it came to the investigation.

She says at every press conference new information would be released.

Lucki believes the allegations stem from miscommunication, adding she’s a calm person who at no time got upset that the details were not given out.

“There were a lot of issues we were having with the flow of communication. Whether or not it was released was not my concern. Somebody asked me if it was going to be a part of it. I asked them, and they said yes, and it wasn’t,” Lucki says. “We were getting criticized by the media at every angle for the lack of timely information.”

**With files from Kevin Northup.**

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nw5aGg080Sg 

 


MCC Day 54 – Sup Darren Campbell Testifies and Senior RCMP Officers Point Fingers

132 views
Jul 25, 2022
678 subscribers
It was a busy day for those following the analysis of actions of senior RCMP officers during the events of the mass shooting of April 18-19, 2020 and the press conferences which were held in the aftermath. Superintendent Darren Campbell, who was the third ranking officer in NS at the time of the mass shooting, was testifying in Halifax in the Mass Casualty Commission proceedings. At the same time, Federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair, RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki, and Chief Superintendent Chris Leather were all appearing before the Public Safety and National Security Committee. 
 
I was watching both proceedings during the early afternoon when there was an overlap of a few hours. There was a time when Commissioner Lucki was in Ottawa talking about how she wanted to be open and transparent, while at the same time in Halifax, Sup. Campbell was saying the same thing. Meanwhile the evidence was showing that Commissioner Lucki had quashed an idea to participate in a CBC Fifth Estate documentary, and Sup. Campbell had withheld information on firearms during a press conference. It was more than a little disorienting. 
 
The officers seem to recognize that their collective performance has received a failing grade, and are now trying to deflect blame from themselves to others in the senior roles in Nova Scotia and nationally, while at the same time protecting the reputation of the RCMP itself.
 
David Amos
Methinks you enjoyed the circus today as much as I did N'esy Pas?

 

 https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/province-house/will-the-mass-casualty-commission-report-even-matter/

 

Will the mass casualty commission report even matter?

Last week, Examiner editor Tim Bousquet asked 'What's the point of the Mass Casualty Commission?' In his column today, Stephen Kimber offers a (slightly) more hopeful take. He says it's too soon to know.

The Mass Casualty Commission, with (left to right) commissioners Leanne Fitch, Michael MacDonald, and Kim Stanton, in February 2022. Pool photo by Andrew Vaughan/ Canadian Press

So… is it already too late for the Mass Casualty Commission’s final report to matter?

Was its credibility irreparably shredded even before it began, thanks to the circumstances of its unwanted-by-governments birth? By its ever-escalating costs? By the encyclopedic weight of its mandate? By its slowness in beginning its public hearings? By its overly trauma-informed interpretation of how it should go about its business? By its seemingly restrictive rules around questioning important witnesses? By endless, earnest research reports, expert opinions, round-table discussions and panels delving into broader social issues like domestic violence that few seemed to pay attention to and even fewer believed the commission’s consideration would improve? By the by-now inevitable cover-up conspiracy theories that have dogged its every decision? By an unrealistic, too tight deadline to complete its work.

My own answer to my first question is that we don’t simply know. Not yet.

Let’s circle back to those other issues.

The public inquiry into the horrific mass murders of April 2020 did not get off to an auspicious start. Neither Ottawa nor the provincial government wanted one. Instead, they announced a review they could limit and control.

The families of the victims rightly pushed back, the governments eventually backed down and created a public inquiry with a broad mandate and a restricted timeline.

The families’ success in forcing governments to change their minds gave some among them a sense of empowerment and entitlement. They felt they now had the right to direct the process.

But the inquiry’s broad mandate (“causes, context and circumstances”) meant that this was never just about them or the deaths of their individual loved ones.  Intimate partner violence, family violence, gun regulations, police responses, public alert systems…

At the same time, the inquiry’s restricted timeline — its work is supposed to be done and dusted by November 1, less than two years after it began — created an impossible burden for the commission.

Oh, and then there was COVID. The mass shooting happened early in the pandemic and the inquiry’s work was inevitably slowed and hampered by its ongoing impact.

Oh, and then there was its trauma-informed mandate. That’s a reflection — for good and ill — of the times in which we live. But the commissioners’ understandable desire not to retraumatize families already traumatized by the events of April 2020 quickly smacked up against the reality that many of those same families felt they were being more re-traumatized by the commissioners’ attempts to protect them.

Instead, the main beneficiaries of the commission’s trauma-informed approach seem to be some RCMP officers whose union and lawyers asked for special treatment for them.

It’s worth noting that only six witnesses asked for accommodation to testify. One was denied outright, two were allowed to testify as a panel and three were granted various other levels of accommodation.

So far as we know, none of the Mounties’ most senior officers — the ultimate decision-makers — have been excused or will be accommodated. Darren Campbell and C/Supt. Chris Leather will testify for two days each this week. In late August, Lee Bergerman and Brenda Lucki are scheduled to appear

That said, the inquiry’s timeline means not every question will ultimately be resolved by testimony and/or cross-examination.

Let’s consider two examples.

Two on-the-ground RCMP officers provided investigators with different accounts of what they did in the first seven minutes after they arrived at the scene where Heather O’Brien had just been shot by the killer.

Their memories of which one did what when in those chaotic minutes differ. Each remembers being the one to open O’Brien’s car door, check her pulse and believe — briefly — that she might be alive.

What appeared to make that discrepancy significant was the fact that O’Brien’s family later said they had data indicating her FitBit continued to show a pulse hours later.

Did the police leave her to die?

The commission didn’t call either officer to provide public testimony. Why not?

Well, consider their full statements to investigators and then fast forward to how those first six minutes ended.

One officer, a trained medic, who initially said he’d thought he’d detected a pulse with his thumb had called for a LifeFlight air ambulance.

His partner, also a trained medic, wasn’t so sure. Given the gravity of her injuries, he wondered if what his partner had felt was the result of his own adrenaline, or perhaps the result of hopeful tunnel vision.

He suggested they perform “a systematic parallel check of the pulse at her carotid, brachial, and femoral arteries for 10 to 15 seconds each. They did not detect a pulse. Cpl. Ivany then conducted a pupil check with his flashlight and found them unresponsive. Due to these findings, and the severity of her injuries, he determined that Ms. O’Brien was deceased.”

The commission did call the chief medical examiner, who ultimately conducted the autopsy on O’Brien, as a witness. His expert testimony — based on 16 years’ experience — was that her death had been instantaneous or had occurred within minutes.

The unscientific FitBit data didn’t change his view.

He was, it should be noted, cross-examined.

The other example involves retired RCMP constable Troy Maxwell, who responded to a 2013 complaint from Brenda Forbes about GW, the man who would become the mass killer.

We have testimony from Forbes, that the complaint involved an alleged domestic assault by the killer on Lisa Banfield, his common-law spouse.

Maxwell denied that to investigators. He claimed the complaint had been about the killer driving dangerously on local roads in a replica Mountie car.

In her own testimony, Banfield not only confirmed the assault happened as Forbes had described but also testified that the killer didn’t own a replica RCMP car until six years later.

That’s a significantly different version of events. And it’s important because it raises questions about how seriously the Mounties took allegations of domestic abuss, including, in particular, by GW himself.

Maxwell was called to testify. He stuck to his original story, but during cross-examination by one of the lawyers for the families — yes, they were able to ask questions — he offered a telling explanation of why he hadn’t bothered to seek statements from those whose names he wrote down, including Banfield’s, before closing the file.

“We don’t have the ability to sit around and say, ‘Oh yeah, we’re going to spend an hour on this,’” he testified.

We don’t know what the commissioners will make of Maxwell’s testimony — or, really, anything else they’ve heard. Other than emphasizing that the inquiry is trauma-informed, they haven’t said much.

They will have plenty to consider. There are now more than 60 so-called foundational documents, supplementary reports and policy documents, deep dives into everything from minute-by-minute accounts of what happened when during the killer’s rampage, to his family and personal history of violence, to his financial misdealings.  Those documents include cross-referenced investigator interviews, statements, audio recordings, photos, transcripts of police calls, etc.

And all are available to anyone with just a few mouse clicks. They’re worth a read.

Despite suggestions from some critics that the commission was created to exonerate the RCMP, those documents paint a damning picture of police incompetence and failure at every level.

The commissioners will have all of that to consider.

Plus, there are close to 20 more research and technical reports on everything from “Communications Interoperability and the Alert Ready System,” to “Crime Prevention and Community Safety in Rural Communities,” to “Police and First Responder Decision-making During Mass Casualty Events.”

Not to forget the transcripts of all the roundtables and panels that have occupied the commissioners’ attention during the public hearings.

Does any of that matter?

In Thursday’s Morning File, my colleague, a frustrated Tim Bousquet, who has probably spent more time and energy covering this story than almost any other journalist, asked “What’s the point?”

For sure, the inquiry has helped us understand what happened before and during the murders of April 18 and 19, 2020. There is a veritable treasure trove of documentation released, the likes of which I’ve never seen publicly available before.

And the inquiry is at least raising important questions about the “why?” of it all, questioning that looks at issues of policing, emergency responses, care for first responders, how next-of-kin notifications work, intimate partner violence, political and bureaucratic intervention in police operations, and more.

In November, the three commissioners will release their final report, including a long list of recommendations. I have no doubt the recommendations will be thoughtful, and also that they will mostly be ignored.

He may be right.

But he may not be.

Many people, including some critics of the current commission, consider the 1990 Royal Commission on the Donald Marshall, Jr., Prosecution to be the “gold standard” for such inquiries.

We tend to remember its key factual finding — that Marshall, who’d spent more than a decade in prison for a murder he didn’t commit, was failed by the criminal justice system…

at virtually every turn, from his arrest and wrongful conviction for murder in 1971 up to, and even beyond, his acquittal by the Court of Appeal in 1983. The tragedy of the failure is compounded by evidence that this miscarriage of justice could — and should — have been prevented, or at least corrected quickly, if those involved in the system had carried out their duties in a professional and/or competent manner. That they did not is due, in part at least, to the fact that Donald Marshall, Jr. is a Native.

But, as the commission itself pointed out a few paragraphs later, its role was not…

just to determine whether one individual was the victim of a miscarriage of justice, or even to get to the bottom of how and why that miscarriage occurred. The Nova Scotia Government, which appointed this Royal Commission on October 28, 1986, also asked us to “make recommendations” to help prevent such tragedies from happening in the future.

The commission’s final report, which ran to seven volumes, included research studies that — like the various research reports and roundtables of the current mass casualty commission — were largely ignored by the media and the public as they unfolded. But they helped shape the most far-reaching of the report’s 82 recommendations.

These covered legal procedures for righting wrongful convictions, as well as new criminal justice system policies regarding visible minorities, and police. They recommended, for example, that the Crown make full and timely disclosure to the defence of all relevant information. The commission also recommended that public provincial prosecutors remain totally independent from any political interference. These prosecutors, argued the commission, should be answerable only to a province’s legislature, not the attorney general. In the case of federal prosecutors, they are answerable to Canada’s Parliament…

The Marshall Inquiry’s recommendations led to the creation of the first independent public prosecution service in Canada. As well, the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society established its first race relations committee. The inquiry and its recommendations helped bring more inclusion and diversity to Nova Scotia’s and Canada’s law schools and public service.

No one will pretend the Marshall report ended racism in the criminal justice system in Nova Scotia, or that all its recommendations were implemented.

As Michelle Williams, the then-chair of the Dal Law School’s Indigenous Blacks a& Mi’kmaq program — itself a result of the report — told a 2018 panel on the report’s impact: “Many of the Marshall Commission’s recommendations have yet to be implemented… There are no specific restorative justice programs. Black and Indigenous peoples are still overrepresented in the criminal justice system.”

Still… I think it’s fair to say the Marshall commission not only led to some significant positive changes but also changed the conversation around race in Nova Scotia.

Can the Mass Casualty Commission do the same for issues around gun violence and gender-based violence?

I don’t know.

It will depend.

On the report that the commissioners write.

On the willingness of governments to address the recommendations.

And on our own individual and collective commitment as citizens to push for change.

I live in hope.

 

https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featured/whats-the-point-of-the-mass-casualty-commission/ 

 

What’s the point of the Mass Casualty Commission?

The Mass Casualty Commission, with (left to right) commissioners Leanne Fitch, Michael MacDonald, and Kim Stanton, in February 2022. Pool photo by Andrew Vaughan/ Canadian Press

What’s the point?

That’s the question I keep asking myself about the Mass Casualty Commission, as the commissioners, the many lawyers (so many, I’ve lost count), the relatives of the victims, the police, the academic experts, the reporters, and the public participate in the months-long inquiry.

For sure, the inquiry has helped us understand what happened before and during the murders of April 18 and 19, 2020. There is a veritable treasure trove of documentation released, the likes of which I’ve never seen publicly available before.

And the inquiry is at least raising important questions about the “why?” of it all, questioning that looks at issues of policing, emergency responses, care for first responders, how next-of-kin notifications work, intimate partner violence, political and bureaucratic intervention in police operations, and more.

I’m a reporter. It’s my job to cover all these issues, and in that tiny prism of insight, I’ve learned a lot and hopefully explained to the public in an intelligible manner some of what I’ve learned.

But again: what’s the point?

In November, the three commissioners will release their final report, including a long list of recommendations. I have no doubt the recommendations will be thoughtful, and also that they will mostly be ignored.

Oh, any recommendations about buying cops new gear and increasing police budgets will be latched upon with enthusiasm by the RCMP and its supporters. Post-inquiry, probably a bunch of money will be spent on stuff we didn’t need an inquiry to tell us to do — radio equipment and emergency alert systems will be upgraded, consultants will write new internal RCMP policies about active shooters in rural areas, and already overworked general duty cops will be saddled with more training and paperwork. But whatever lessons are learned from Portapique won’t apply to the next mass murder, and all too soon we’ll be going through this whole process again.

So far as any commission recommendations that involve institutional or societal change go, the commissioners will be thanked for their work, patted on their heads, and sent on their way. And the RCMP will continue to be the same broken bureaucracy it’s always been, and we’ll continue to have the same broken, sexist society we’ve always had.

Maybe this process will bring closure to those who have lost loved ones? We might hope so, but it won’t. That’s not how this ends. No matter what the commission does, those family members will continue to carry pain and anger, and will continue to have questions about the unanswerable. Long after this inquiry is over and the rest of the world moves on to whatever comes next, those who have lost will continue to shoulder their enormously heavy losses.

For now, we’re spending tens of millions of dollars on the inquiry, and everybody gets a slice of the pie. The commissioners themselves get their six-figure salaries, as judges do. The lawyers get their hourly rate, as lawyers do. The academics land some commissioned contracts, as academics do. A litany of support staff (communications and tech staff, security, venue cooks and janitors, etc.) get much-needed work in these difficult financial times, as support staff do. And reporters get a bunch of assignments at shit pay, as reporters do.

That’s not criticism, and it’s especially not criticism of those who are just working their damn jobs and trying to survive. We all need to eat. But let’s not ignore that we’re spending those tens of millions of dollars on this public process and not on some other public need, like providing housing or addressing the climate crisis. We should think about what we value, and what we don’t value so much.

I feel like I’m playing something more than an observer’s role in a public ritual that sometimes borders on Shirley Jackson’s The Lottery— someone is selected for the daily stoning, and we all join in to appease whatever god we think we’ve been neglecting.

Maybe the metaphorical stoning is deserved. It’s impossible not to fault those who were aware of the violence inflicted upon Lisa Banfield and did nothing, or those who had knowledge of the killer’s illegal weapons and failed to report them. Clearly, there were multiple policing failures by many individual cops. There’s a lot of blame to go around, and I’ve tossed my fair share of stones.

Yet I often come out of the daily proceedings of the inquiry not so much angry about this or that person, but rather disappointed with humanity in general. We’re a messy species, full of contradictions and pain and weird desires and strange motivations, and we’re not very capable of deep thought or changing our ways. All that messiness plays out every day in eight billion little dramas across the full spectrum of tragedy and comedy, but it takes a terrible mass murder before we give it any real scrutiny.

Which is to say, I don’t know what the fuck the point of this is.

There was a terrible loss of life, and too much pain to be privately contained. The hurt is enormous, and inescapable. So as messy humans do, we ritualize it with an inquiry.

And I report on it, because that’s what I do. And because I’m a messy human too, some of my reporting is better and some worse. I sometimes don’t give enough attention to things that deserve more attention, and sometimes give too much attention to things that deserve less. I have my own interests, my own insights and lack thereof, my own skills and inabilities.

Sometimes a few stones are tossed in my direction. I won’t go into this at any depth, but I will say that it’s my job as an editor to make informed judgment calls about what to publish and what not to publish, and there are reasons for those decisions. I can’t always make those reasons public, but I try to do this work with integrity, and it has to be left there. I won’t get in a pissing match about it.

Anyway, next week RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell and C/Supt. Chris Leather will testify, for two days each. So I’ll be covering that in depth. And then I’m going to take a mini vacation before returning in late August for the testimony of Lee Bergerman and Brenda Lucki.

My apologies for being a bit disjointed here. But if you value the Examiner’s reporting on the inquiry and everything else, please consider subscribing. Subscribers make this work possible. Thank you!

 

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Public Editor, The Toronto Star"<publiced@thestar.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:04:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

THANK YOU for contacting the Toronto Star Public Editor's office.

This office handles queries about  accuracy and the Star's
journalistic standards as set out in its Newsroom Policy and
Journalistic Standards Guide

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2011/12/07/toronto_star_newsroom_policy_and_journalistic_standards_guide.html

The public editor's office is staffed Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., by Public Editor Bruce Campion-Smith and Public Editor,
Associate, Maithily Panchalingam.

If you are requesting a correction or questioning journalistic
standards, please send a link or details of where you read the article
you are questioning, (e.g.- date, page number, digital device.) Please
include your full name and a telephone number where we can reach you
for further information if necessary. Unfortunately, due to the volume
of emails we receive, we cannot reply to every email, but we do read
them all, consider carefully the issues raised, and take appropriate
action to attempt to resolve complaints in cases of error or breach of
the Star's standards.

Some messages to the public editor may be published in Bruce
Campion-Smith's public editor column, which explores journalistic
issues raised by readers. Please inform us if you do not want your
message published.

Corrections:  The public editor's office looks into claims of error on
any and all platforms on which the  Star publishes. The Star corrects
significant errors of fact. When we determine a correction is called
for, it will be published as soon as possible; the article will also
be corrected online and a correction appended. Generally, news
corrections are published on page A2 and corrections for other
sections (including Sports, Entertainment and Life)  are published in
those sections. Corrections are also published online:
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/corrections

Because many readers often point out the same error, we cannot notify
each person that we are publishing a correction. As well, because of
the volume of queries we receive, we are not always able to respond to
explain why we determined no correction is necessary. Every query
about a possible error is considered thoroughly however. We  thank all
readers  who take the time to help the Star report accurately.

Unpublishing: Generally, the Star does not delete (unpublish) content
from our websites or archives, except in some rare circumstances
following consultation with the editor-in-chief, managing editor, and
in some cases, legal counsel. In the case of verified errors, we will
correct/update the article and/or append corrections as necessary but
will not remove it from the Star' s digital  publishing record.

General feedback about coverage: If you are writing to express your
view of the Star's coverage, your message will be forwarded to the
appropriate department. Because of the volume of email we receive,
neither the public editor's office, nor the journalists in specific
departments, can respond to every reader comment about the Star's
coverage.

Letters to the Editor: If you want your comments expressing your view
considered for publication as a Letter to the Editor, please resend
your message to lettertoed@thestar.ca<mailto:lettertoed@thestar.ca>.
Letters must include full name, address and all phone numbers of
sender (daytime, evening and cellphone). Street names and phone
numbers will not be published. The Star reserves the right to edit
letters, which typically run 50-150 words. Please note: The Star
receives many more letters than it has  space to print. Due to the
volume, we unfortunately cannot acknowledge every submission.

Submissions to the Star: Commentaries, opinion pieces, story pitches
and press releases should be submitted to the section of the Star to
which they are best suited. A full list of departments is published on
the "Contact Us" page of the Star's website:
https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

How to reach a Star journalist: Most staff members, including
reporters, editors, columnists and photographers, can be reached by
email. In most cases the email address follows this formula (all lower
case, don't type spaces or the plus sign): first initial + last name
@thestar.ca. You can also reach staff in the Editorial department
(newsroom) via phone at 416-869-4300 or fax at 416-869-4328. Editorial
staff members can also be contacted within the department they work
for. To reach a freelance writer, please contact the section in which
his or her article appeared.

Subscriptions/Customer Service: The public editor's office handles
concerns about editorial content only.  For home delivery
subscriptions, delivery problems, billing inquiries and other customer
service matters, please email
circmail@thestar.ca<mailto:circmail@thestar.ca>. You may also go to
our Subscription page<http://www.thestar.com/about/subscribe.html> for
home delivery information.

Further information about how to contact other departments in the Star
can be found here: https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

Thank you for reading your Toronto Star.

 

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2022/07/25/despite-witness-accounts-mounties-couldnt-believe-mass-shooter-had-replica-rcmp-car.html 

 

Despite witness accounts, Mounties couldn’t believe mass shooter had replica RCMP car

HALIFAX—The RCMP didn’t immediately follow up on reports that a killer was driving a replica police car because it was inconceivable to officers that someone could have meticulously replicated one, a senior RCMP officer on Monday told the inquiry into the mass shooting in Nova Scotia.

Darren Campbell, now the RCMP chief superintendent in New Brunswick, was, in April 2020, the senior Mountie in Nova Scotia in charge of the mass killing, in which Gabriel Wortman killed 22 people before he was shot dead by police.

In the days that followed, Campbell would be the most public face of the RCMP, the one who conducted the majority of briefings on the police force’s investigation.

In the first call to 911 on the night of April 18, Jamie Blair, the second of the killer’s victims, said the person who had just shot her husband was her neighbour, that he had a replica police car, which was decaled and labelled RCMP, and that he was not a police officer.

Further witnesses that night, including the Blair and McCully children, and Andrew and Kate MacDonald — Andrew was shot in the shoulder by the killer — confirmed those details.

Yet the police, in their communications that night, downplayed the possibility that the killer might be driving a replica RCMP car, instead checking to see if one of their own cars had gone missing, and then introducing the idea that they were looking for a decommissioned police car — a white Ford Taurus — something the gunman was known to collect.

The information that the car was, in fact, an exact replica of an RCMP vehicle, marked and decaled, was not passed along, an oversight that Campbell said could have made a significant difference in how the police went about looking for the killer.

RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell discusses the timeline of events and locations of the Nova Scotia shootings at RCMP headquarters in Dartmouth, N.S., in this April 2020 file photo.

Campbell likened police communications on that subject to a game of “Telephone,” where a relayed message gets distorted as it is passed from person to person.

Mass Casualty Commission counsel Rachel Young asked Campbell if he saw the failure to pass on the details about the vehicle as a significant breakdown in the gathering and sharing of information on that night.

What I think happened — which is, I think, an element of human nature and perhaps biases that are created through our own experiences — is that the realistic possibility of someone creating a replica police car was probably lost on individuals,” Campbell said.

“The likelihood of someone who had created that to a degree in which the perpetrator did … my sense is, is that that was a factor that contributed to that miscommunication.”

He said that in his 32 years of policing, he had never encountered someone who had created a replica police car. Had he been responding directly to the incident himself, he said, he likely would have made the same assumptions about the witness reports.

“If they had known that we were looking for (a marked RCMP car), if they had made that assessment and communicated, ‘Everyone, we are looking for a marked police car. Whether it’s real or not, we don’t know.’ Certainly, that would have made a difference,” he told the commission.

“Without understanding that, any responding officer could have seen a police vehicle in the area and just thought they were another responding police vehicle. And we could have missed an opportunity for engaging the individual.”

But Campbell would not go so far as to say that what multiple witnesses described to police was actually a replica RCMP car.

“Would you agree that from those first, earliest moments of the mass casualty, witnesses told the (Operational Communications Centre) and the RCMP that there was a replica cruiser out there?” asked inquiry counsel Rachel Young.

“Not a replica cruiser. No, I wouldn’t agree with that,” replied Campbell. “But they mentioned that there was a police car, and it was (decaled) and labelled RCMP.”

“And it was not a police officer. That I would agree with. But to characterize it as a replica police car … there’s no information in there to suggest it was a replica police car.”

That prompted an outburst, “Oh, come on!” from someone in attendance at the inquiry.

Campbell suggested that a better system of operational communications should give officers direct access to the witness statements, rather than have them rely on information passed on from officer to officer.

Controversy erupted around Campbell last month when his handwritten notes on a teleconference held with RCMP commissioner Brenda Lucki days after the mass casualty were made public by the inquiry.

In the meeting between the Nova Scotia RCMP contingent and its national counterparts, Campbell’s notes documented a browbeating from Lucki following his decision to not release details on the guns used in the shooting. Campbell had said that releasing that information would have compromised the RCMP investigation.

According to those notes, Lucki told the N.S. contingent that she’d promised then-public safety minister Bill Blair and the Prime Minister’s Office that those details would be released.

“The commissioner was obviously upset,” Campbell wrote in his notes.

“The commissioner accused us (me) of disrespecting her by not following her instructions.”

“Some in the room were reduced to tears and were emotional over this belittling reprimand,” he added later in his notes.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government was, at the time, in the process of pushing through an order-in-council that would ban the sale of 1,500 models of assault-style firearms.

That revelation led to accusations of Lucki — and, by extension, Blair and Trudeau — interfering with the Nova Scotia RCMP’s investigation. Critics called for Lucki’s resignation.

All three have denied any interference in the investigation. Lucki and Blair appeared Monday before a House of Commons committee investigating those allegations.

At the same time, the RCMP came under further criticism when the MCC revealed that the four pages of Campbell’s notes that documented that teleconference had been omitted when it first submitted those notes to the inquiry.

Campbell’s testimony to the commission Monday did not cover the controversy. He is scheduled to be before the inquiry again Tuesday.

SM
Steve McKinley is a Halifax-based reporter for the Star. Follow him on Twitter: @smckinley1

 

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:01:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

[French follows/ le français suit]

I will be out the country with limited access to my email until July
27th, 2022. In my absence, please contact Jeremy Broadhurst or Ben
Chin.

Jeremy.Broadhurst@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
Ben.Chin@pmo-cpm.gc.ca

Je serai hors du pays et j'aurai un accès limité à mes courriels
jusqu'au 27 juillet 2022. En mon absence, veuillez communiquer avec
Jeremy Broadhurst ou Ben Chin.

Jeremy.Broadhurst@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
Ben.Chin@pmo-cpm.gc.ca



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Campbell, Darren"<darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:01:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Good day,

I will be away from the office from July 24th to July 27th
inclusively. Supt. Andy LeClair will be acting in my absence.  He can
be reached by email at Andy.leClair@rcmp-grc.gc.ca or by mobile at
604-341-8656.
*******
Bonjour,

Je serai absent du bureau du 24 au 27 juillet inclusivement.  Le
surintendant Andy LeClair sera en intérim pendant mon absence.  Vous
pouvez le rejoindre par courriel à Andy.leClair@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ou par
cellulaire au 604-341-8656.

Thank you / merci

C/Supt. Darren Campbell, Surint. pr.
Interim OIC CROPS / Officier responsable de l'OREC en interim
RCMP "J" Division / GRC division "J"



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Pineo, Robert"<RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:01:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.  Please note that I will be out of the
office during the week of July 25-29, 2022 preparing for or attending
the Public Inquiry.  I will be checking my messages and will try to
respond within 24 hours.

If you matter is urgent, please email Cassandra Billard at
cbillard@pattersonlaw.ca.

I apologize for any inconvenience.




---------- Original message ----------
From: "McCulloch, Sandra"<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:01:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be unavailable the week of July 25th, preparing for and
attending the the Mass Casualty Commission. I will be accessing email
only periodically, as time permits, and will attend to your message at
the earliest opportunity. If you require an urgent response, please
contact Theresa Kaye at tkaye@pattersonlaw.ca or (902) 897-2000.




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Rhonda M. Brown"<Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:02:04 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thanks for getting in touch. I'm out of the office until Monday,
August 9 but will be checking email occasionally.

If your matter is urgent, please contact Richard Dooley at
Richard.Dooley@globalnews.ca

Thanks,

Rhonda




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Bergen, Candice - M.P."<candice.bergen@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:04:34 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Hon. Candice Bergen, thank you for contacting the
Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.

Ms. Bergen greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
possible.

If you are a constituent of Ms. Bergen’s in Portage-Lisgar with an
urgent matter please provide complete contact information.  Not
identifying yourself as a constituent could result in a delayed
response.

Once again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,

Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Au nom de l’hon. Candice Bergen, nous vous remercions de communiquer
avec le Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle.

Mme Bergen accorde une grande importance aux commentaires des
Canadiens.  Nous lisons et étudions tous les courriels entrants.
Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.  Nous y
répondons le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous faites partie de l’électorat de Mme Bergen dans la
circonscription de Portage-Lisgar et que votre affaire est urgente,
veuillez fournir vos coordonnées complètes.  Si vous ne le faites pas,
cela pourrait retarder la réponse.

Nous vous remercions une fois encore d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,

Bureau de la cheffe de l’Opposition officielle




---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:04:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 22:04:52 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.

As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.

If you are looking for the most up-to-date information from the
Government of Nova Scotia please visit:
http://novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CJane.MacDonald%40novascotia.ca%7Ceeca3674da1940841c1b08da0c273c2c%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637835659900957160%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=%2BUnVWeFXmCZiYsg7%2F6%2Bw55jn3t3WTeGL9l%2BLp%2BNkqNU%3D&reserved=0>

Thank you,

Premier’s Correspondence Team

 

----------Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 19:01:09 -0300
Subject: Fw Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or journalist or professor
or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were ethical they would have
blown the whistle by now if only to protect their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: bill.blair@parl.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca, "Moiz.Karimjee"
<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@justice.gc.ca>, "Barbara.Whitenect"
<Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Jennifer.duggan"<Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.fitch"<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>, tim <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>,
"darren.campbell"<darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Gorman"
<Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, "michael.macdonald"
<michael.macdonald@thecanadianpress.com>, "Rhonda.Brown"
<Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, jesse
<jesse@viafoura.com>, publiced@thestar.ca, newsroom@therecord.com,
stevemckinley@thestar.ca, "ian.fahie"<ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, tblackwell@postmedia.com,
paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, "pierre.poilievre"
<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, andrewjdouglas
<andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>,
nsinvestigators <nsinvestigators@gmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, "Candice.Bergen"
<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 04:40:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: 13 deadly hours Perhaps Elizabeth McMillan
and Lisa Mayor should have another talk with the lawyers Sean.Fraser
and Robert Pineo EH?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Pineo, Robert"<RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 04:40:12 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: 13 deadly hours Perhaps Elizabeth McMillan
and Lisa Mayor should have another talk with the lawyers Sean.Fraser
and Robert Pineo EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. I will be attending outside meetings during
the week of November 16, 2020 and will not have access to my telephone
or email. I will return your messages during the evenings. Thank you
and have a nice day.



 

Senior N.S. Mountie says Ottawa did not act on request for review of mass shooting response

Supt. Darren Campbell testifying before the public inquiry on Monday and Tuesday

Supt. Darren Campbell is testifying Monday before the Mass Casualty Commission leading the public inquiry into the killings on April 18-19, 2020, when a gunman shot and killed 22 people over 13 hours in several communities throughout the province. The victims include a pregnant woman and an RCMP officer. 

Campbell was the support services officer at the time of the shootings, which made him the third-highest ranked Mountie in the province. He handled most of the public briefings after April 19, 2020, and was in charge of bringing in critical incident resources like incident commanders and the emergency response team.

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

After Campbell met with key responders and managers who were on during the mass shooting, including retired staff sergeants Jeff West and Kevin Surette, who were the incident commanders, he said he wanted an independent assessment of the Nova Scotia response.

On a "number of occasions" Campbell approached the national unit handling contract and Indigenous policing in Ottawa for this review, he said, which would ideally be done by critical incident commanders from outside the RCMP who had trained through the Canadian Police College.

He wrote a formal letter asking for this review and it went up to the deputy commissioner of the unit, but Campbell said he never received a formal response. Campbell said he got the sense Ottawa was wondering whether a review would be duplicating efforts of the Mass Casualty Commission.

"I was disappointed, because I saw utility and value in having other Canadian critical incident commanders look at what we did to identify what we did properly, and to identify any gaps that could be addressed immediately," Campbell said.

When asked by commission counsel whether he could have launched an internal Nova Scotia RCMP review of the response, Campbell said it's important to go outside of the province to ensure those looking at what happened can be objective.

Campbell unsatisfied with firearm investigation

Campbell told the commission he is unsatisfied with the investigation into how Gabriel Wortman obtained firearms and brought them into Canada.

"In terms of those that assisted him, I would say for me, personally, I'm not satisfied that we've been able to conclude what I believe the expectations of survivors and victim families would expect and personally, me as a police officer and investigator, what I would wish to accomplish, in terms of the provision of firearms. That is the outstanding element for me."

Campbell confirmed in his testimony that any U.S. investigations into the gunman's acquisition of firearms are now closed.

A CBC investigation found that at least two people in Maine may have broken U.S. federal laws by helping the gunman obtain firearms.

After police shot and killed the gunman at a gas station in Enfield, N.S., they found five firearms in his possession. Investigators traced three to Houlton, Maine, a town near the New Brunswick border.

Court records and documents released by the commission suggested a longtime friend in the small town gave him one handgun, and that Wortman took another from the man's home. The gunman also arranged to buy a high-powered rifle for cash after attending a gun show there.

Under U.S. law, it is illegal for an American to transfer, sell, trade, give, transport or deliver a firearm to someone they know is not a U.S. resident.

The two remaining guns found in Wortman's possession after his death included Const. Heidi Stevenson's service pistol and a pistol bequeathed to him by his friend, former Fredericton lawyer Tom Evans.

Campbell said while officers are no longer actively investigating the Portapique case, the investigation has not been officially closed, and police will still take action if new information is received.

Leather testifying later this week

Campbell said his bosses at the time, Chief Supt. Chris Leather and former commanding officer Lee Bergerman, would have been aware of his request, but he did not know if they supported it or had conversations about it.

The commission's outline for this week indicates Campbell's testimony Monday and Tuesday will cover topics including public communications during and after the rampage and other context. 

The force has been widely criticized for not providing information to the public about the gunman's movements in a replica RCMP cruiser in a more timely manner. The Mounties relied on social media to provide updates and didn't notify the public that the gunman was driving a replica police car for more than two hours after confirming the information.

Chief Supt. Chris Leather was the second-highest ranking Mountie in Nova Scotia at the time of the shootings. (CBC)

Families of the victims have also been critical of the information provided to them about their loved ones during and after the shootings.

Campbell's handwritten notes taken during a meeting on April 28, 2020, touched off a political firestorm when they were released by the commission in June. The notes described a conference call with RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki, who berated the Nova Scotia management team for failing to disclose the types of firearms used by the gunman.

Campbell's notes indicated Lucki made a comment about promising the Prime Minister's Office and minister of public safety that information would be released. At the time, the federal Liberal government was getting ready to introduce new gun control legislation. 

The federal opposition parties are accusing Lucki of applying political pressure to the Nova Scotia investigators to help the federal government build its case.

Lucki and former public safety minister Bill Blair will both appear Monday before a House of Commons committee investigating the allegations of political interference.

Leather, the second-highest ranking Mountie in Nova Scotia at the time of the shootings, will also appear before the committee. He is then scheduled to testify before the commission in Nova Scotia on Wednesday and Thursday.

The commission's schedule indicates Leather will be questioned about "internal and inter-agency communication" after the shootings.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 

Full Testimony: Minister Blair on alleged political interference in N.S. massacre investigation

352 views
Jul 25, 2022
6DislikeShareSave
 97.8K subscribers
Subscribe http://www.youtube.com/user/nationalp...Testifying Monday morning before the House standing committee on public safety and national security, Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair denied allegations that he and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau pressured RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki to convince investigators to release information on the firearms used by Nova Scotia gunman Gabriel Wortman The House committee probing political interference into the police investigation of the Nova Scotia mass shooting will also hear from RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki.
David Amos

---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 04:40:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: 13 deadly hours Perhaps Elizabeth McMillan and Lisa Mayor should have another talk with the lawyers Sean.Fraser and Robert Pineo EH?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

 
 
 
 
 

Full Testimony: RCMP's Brenda Lucki on alleged political interference in N.S. massacre investigation

334 views
Jul 25, 2022
6DislikeShareSave
 97.8K subscribers
RCMP boss Brenda Lucki appears before commons committee on N.S. shooting probe.
 
David Amos
Follow the money 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Brenda Lucki <brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:06:51 -0400
Subject: Re: RE My calls AGAIN today about WAR, MURDER, MONEY, TAXATION and George Soros and Iggy versus Sebastian Kurz and Viktor Orbán etc (Away on Leave - En congé)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Bonjour - Hello

I am currently away on holidays, and will return Tuesday, March 27th. If
you require assistance during my absence, please contact Cpl. Roshan
Pinto at 639-625-3577 or Nicole Yandon at 639-625-3066.  I will be
checking my e-mails periodically.

Je suis présentement en congé de retour au bureau mardi, le 27  mars.
Pour toute demande urgente, veuillez communiquer avec Cap. Roshan Pinto
au 639-625-3577 ou Nicole Yandon au 639-625-3066.  Je vais vérifier mon
courrier électronique périodiquement.

Brenda

>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 03/12/18 11:06 >>>

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/abt-apd/org.html

Paul Rochon Deputy Minister:
Finance Canada
90 Elgin St.
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G5
Phone: 613-369-4434
 
 
 

RCMP HQ refused top officer's request for independent review of Nova Scotia shooting: inquiry

Supt. Darren Campbell's notes suggested that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki had chastised officers investigating the rampage for not releasing details on the guns used by the killer

One of the top RCMP officers involved in responding to Nova Scotia’s mass-shooting rampage in 2020 says he pushed repeatedly to have an independent review of how the incident was handled — only for national headquarters to reject his request.

Chief Supt. Darren Campbell told the federal-provincial inquiry examining the episode Monday he sent emails and a formal letter to highers-up in Ottawa asking for a review by police critical-incident experts not connected to those involved.

Past experience told him that such an outside review — including even officers from other police forces — is more valuable than an internal one, he said.

Campbell said he eventually got the sense that officials in RCMP headquarters felt that the Mass Casualty Commission was already in the works and they did not want a separate police review as well. But he said he believed that could have been useful, providing advice that could have been implemented long before the still-ongoing inquiry is completed.

“I was disappointed because for me as a program manager, I saw utility and value in having other Canadian critical incident commanders to look at what we did … identify gaps that could be identified immediately,” he told the commission.

As head of support services in the RCMP’s H division in Nova Scotia, Campbell oversaw the force’s critical-incident program in the province.

He said he did have a meeting with about 20 of the critical-incident commanders and other senior officers involved in responding to the rampage, but that no report or summary came out of the session. There was a sense of “disillusionment” among the group, said Campbell.

“I looked every one of them in the eye,” he testified. “I do believe every one did everything they could, they did their best and they felt awful about what happened.”

Campbell also revealed he thought it was important for the RCMP to continue releasing what information it could on the incident as time wore on, but that headquarters told H division in late 2020 to no longer do so.

Commissioner Brenda Lucki herself cancelled “at the last minute” tentative plans he had made to be interviewed by CBC’s Fifth Estate program that September, the inquiry heard.

“I was in favour (of doing the interview) largely because of the fact it was clear to me there was much interest in what happened. I mean, it was a catastrophic series of events that many people had questions about,” Campbell testified.

“My concern always was that If we don’t say anything there’s this perception that we’re hiding something. I didn’t want that perception to become a reality.”

National headquarters directed in December that the Nova Scotia division put out no more information on the case, and leave any releases to the newly announced inquiry, he said.

In other testimony, Campbell suggested the that RCMP in Nova Scotia is woefully under-staffed, despite the fact it mainly polices rural areas with long distances between calls.

He had cited 2019 statistics in an earlier report that indicated Halifax municipal police have 209 officers per 100,000 population and the force in Truro, N.S., 286. By contrast, the RCMP in Colchester, N.S., have 76 for every 100,000 people.

“We’re policing rural areas with half the resources of our municipal counterparts who have a much more geographically confined area of responsibility,” said Campbell. “It affects our response times, it affects public safety, it affects officer safety as well.”

Although he didn’t specify how those numbers might have affected response to the April 2020 shooting spree — which saw two officers and 20 other people killed — he said it is an important issue for the commission to address.

“To say it as simply as I possibly can, every single day I always have concerns over the level of resources on our front lines,” said the officer, who is now based in New Brunswick. “I believe wholeheartedly that we are considerably understaffed in order to be able to meet the expectations the public has of us and to make sure our responding officers out there are promptly supported.”

Staffing levels are generally determined by contracts with the province and municipalities and “what communities are willing to pay for and support.”

Campbell’s testimony has been hotly anticipated because of comments he made in notes of a meeting with Lucki 10 days after the mass shooting that ignited charges of political interference in the investigation.

Campbell suggested in the notes that Lucki had chastised local officers investigating the April 2020 rampage for not releasing details on the type of guns used by the killer.

Lucki indicated that she had promised Public Safety Minister Bill Blair and the prime minister’s office that such information would be divulged, and tied the issue to the looming introduction of new gun-control legislation.

Campbell told the commissioner that he had ordered officers not to release the firearms information, out of fear it might jeopardize an investigation still trying to determine where the guns originated, according to his notes. His record of the meeting was released by the Mass-Casualty Commission.

The meeting between Lucki and local RCMP commanders took place 10 days after the shooting rampage through rural Nova Scotia, which left 22 people dead, several others injured and houses destroyed.

Opposition critics accused the Liberal government of interfering in an active police investigation, but Blair denied that he or anyone else in government had pressured the force.

Lucki released a statement saying she regretted her language in the meeting with Campbell, but also insisted there was no political interference.

“It was a tense discussion, and I regret the way I approached the meeting and the impact it had on those in attendance. My need for information should have been better weighed against the seriousness of the circumstances they were experiencing.”

On the other hand, a report released by the inquiry last month argues that the RCMP waited too long to release critical information about the shooting, including the types of firearms used.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToweMrTItBM

 

MCC - DAY 56 - SUPERINTENDENT DARREN CAMPBELL

616 views
Streamed live 6 hours ago

3.44K subscribers
David Amos
I repeat thanks for showing me your nasty arses last night
 

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 23:22:51 -0300
Subject: Methinks I should ask Bonaparte's beloved Burt and Ernie" if
they know how their buddies sleep at night N'esy Pas?
To: NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>,
darrellbcurrie@gmail.com, tkaye@pattersonlaw.ca, Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/status/1551387950944079872


Conversation
Darrell Currie
@darrellbcurrie
·
Jul 18
Hardly anyone at #MCC today! Maybe that’s because they have the same
panelists, repeating the same information…..just a different spin on
it. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck….. Maybe some real
witnesses would be more helpful!


David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to
@darrellbcurrie
I talked to you before this show began then called in and mentioned
you before you called in Correct?
youtube.com
the Nova Scotia Mass Shooting - July 24, 2022 - with Paul Palango
Paul Palango and I will discuss the unfolding public inquiry into the
Nova Scotia Mass Shootings. Advance questions and comments can be
submitted by voice ...
11:04 PM · Jul 24, 2022·


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "McCulloch, Sandra"<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:21:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andy Douglas should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their
article published on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


I will be unavailable July 21st and 22nd attending the  the Mass
Casualty Commission. I will be accessing email only periodically, as
time permits, and will attend to your message at the earliest
opportunity. If you require an urgent response, please contact Theresa
Kaye at tkaye@pattersonlaw.ca or (902) 897-2000




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Fraser, Sean - M.P."<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:21:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andy Douglas should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their
article published on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your message. This is an automated reply.
Facebook: facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<https://www.facebook.com/SeanFraserMP/photos/a.1628138987467042.1073741829.1627521694195438/2066666113614325/?type=3&theater>
Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter.com/SeanFraserMP>
Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www.instagram.com/seanfrasermp/?hl=en>
www.seanfrasermp.ca<file:///C:

/Users/Savannah%20DeWolfe/Downloads/www.seanfrasermp.ca>
Toll free: 1-844-641-5886
Please be advised that this account is for matters related to Central
Nova. If you live outside of Central Nova and your issue pertains to
immigration, please contact Minister@cic.gc.ca
I am currently receiving an extremely high number of emails.
If you are inquiring about Canada’s commitment to welcome vulnerable
Afghan refugees, you can find more information on Canada’s response to
the situation in Afghanistan
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan.html>.
The Government of Canada remains firm in its commitment to welcome
Afghan refugees to Canada, and will be working to increase the number
of eligible refugees to 40,000. This will be done through 2 programs:
1.      A special immigration program for Afghan nationals, and their
families, who assisted the Government of Canada.
You don’t need to currently be in Afghanistan or return to Afghanistan
to be eligible or to have your application processed once you’re able
to apply.
 Find out more about this special immigration
program<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures/immigration-program.html>
2.      A special humanitarian program focused on resettling Afghan
nationals who
·   are outside of Afghanistan
·   don’t have a durable solution in a third country
·   are part of one of the following groups:
·  women leaders
·  human rights
advocates<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/refugees/afghanistan/special-measures.html#human-rights>
·  persecuted religious or ethnic minorities
·  LGBTI individuals
·  journalists and people who helped Canadian journalists
How to reach us
Contact us using our web
form<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/en/>.Please
don’t send photos or other attachments until we ask you to.
By phone at +1-613-321-4243
·        Available both inside Canada and abroad
·        Monday to Friday, 6:30 a.m. to 7 p.m. (ET)
·        Saturday and Sunday, 6:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. (ET)
·        We’ll accept charges for collect calls or calls with reverse charges
If you or a loved one are a Canadian citizen or PR currently in
Afghanistan, contact Global Affairs Canada’s 24/7 Emergency Watch and
Response Centre ASAP by phone (+1-613-996-8885), email
(sos@international.gc.ca<mailto:sos@international.gc.ca>) or text
(+1-613-686-3658).
If you would like to immigrate to Canada, please click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/come-canada-tool.html>
to learn more.
To inquire about the status of an immigration case,click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/immigration-refugees-citizenship/services/application/check-status.html>.
You can also contact your local Member of Parliament for further
assistance. If you don’t know who your Member of Parliament is, you
can find out here, https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
If you have been the victim of fraud or want to report fraudulent
activity, please call the Canada Border Services Agency’s fraud
hotline at 1-888-502-9060.
For other general questions about Canadian immigration, click
here<https://www.canada.ca/en/services/immigration-citizenship.html>.
Thank you.
/////
Veuillez noter que je reçois actuellement un nombre extrêmement élevé
de courriels.
Si vous vous renseignez sur l'engagement du Canada à accueillir les
réfugiés afghans vulnérables, vous pouvez trouver plus d'information
sur la réponse du Canada à la situation en Afghanistan
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan.html>.
Le gouvernement du Canada reste ferme dans son engagement à accueillir
des réfugiés afghans au Canada, et s'efforcera d'augmenter le nombre
de réfugiés admissibles à 40 000. Cela se fera par le biais de deux
programmes :
Un programme d'immigration spécial pour les ressortissants afghans, et
leurs familles, qui ont aidé le gouvernement du Canada.
Vous n'avez pas besoin d'être actuellement en Afghanistan ou d'y
retourner pour être admissible ou pour que votre demande soit traitée,
une fois que vous serez en mesure de présenter une demande.
               Pour en savoir plus sur ce programme d'immigration
spécial<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales/programme-immigration.html>
2.     Un programme humanitaire spécial axé sur la réinstallation des
ressortissants afghans qui
·            se trouvent à l'extérieur de l'Afghanistan
·            n’ont pas de solution durable dans un pays tiers
·            font partie de l'un des groupes suivants :
·            femmes leaders,
·            défenseurs des droits de la
personne<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/refugies/afghanistan/mesures-speciales.html>,
·            minorités religieuses ou ethniques persécutées,
·            personnes LGBTI,
·            journalistes et personnes ayant aidé des journalistes canadiens.
Comment nous joindre
Veuillez communiquer avec nous en utilisant notre formulaire
Web<https://specialmeasures-mesuresspeciales.apps.cic.gc.ca/fr/>.
Veuillez ne pas envoyer de photos ou d'autres pièces jointes jusqu'à
ce que nous vous le demandions.
Par téléphone au +1-613-321-4243.
·            Disponible au Canada et à l’étranger.
·            Du lundi au vendredi, de 6 h 30 à 19 h (HE).
·            Samedi et dimanche, de 6 h 30 à 15 h 30 (HE).
·            Nous acceptons les frais pour les appels à frais virés ou
les appels avec inversion des frais.
Si vous ou un de vos proches êtes un citoyen canadien ou un RP
actuellement en Afghanistan, communiquez dès que possible avec le
Centre de veille et d'intervention d'urgence 24/7 d'Affaires mondiales
Canada par téléphone (+1-613-996-8885), par courriel
(sos@international.gc.ca) ou par texto (+1-613-686-3658).
Si vous souhaitez immigrer au Canada, veuillez cliquer
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/immigrer-canada.html>
pour en savoir plus.
Pour vous renseigner sur l'état d'un dossier d'immigration, cliquez
ici<https://www.canada.ca/fr/immigration-refugies-citoyennete/services/demande/verifier-etat.html>.
Vous pouvez également contacter votre député local pour obtenir une
assistance supplémentaire. Si vous ne savez pas qui est votre député,
vous pouvez le découvrir ici, https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr.
Si vous avez été victime d'une fraude ou si vous voulez signaler une
activité frauduleuse, veuillez appeler la ligne d'assistance
téléphonique de l'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada au
1-888-502-9060.
Pour d'autres questions générales sur l'immigration canadienne,
cliquez ici<canada.ca/immigration>.
Merci.





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Public Editor, The Toronto Star"<publiced@thestar.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:21:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andy Douglas should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their
article published on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

THANK YOU for contacting the Toronto Star Public Editor's office.

This office handles queries about  accuracy and the Star's
journalistic standards as set out in its Newsroom Policy and
Journalistic Standards Guide

https://www.thestar.com/opinion/public_editor/2011/12/07/toronto_star_newsroom_policy_and_journalistic_standards_guide.html

The public editor's office is staffed Monday to Friday, 9 a.m. to 5
p.m., by Public Editor Bruce Campion-Smith and Public Editor,
Associate, Maithily Panchalingam.

If you are requesting a correction or questioning journalistic
standards, please send a link or details of where you read the article
you are questioning, (e.g.- date, page number, digital device.) Please
include your full name and a telephone number where we can reach you
for further information if necessary. Unfortunately, due to the volume
of emails we receive, we cannot reply to every email, but we do read
them all, consider carefully the issues raised, and take appropriate
action to attempt to resolve complaints in cases of error or breach of
the Star's standards.

Some messages to the public editor may be published in Bruce
Campion-Smith's public editor column, which explores journalistic
issues raised by readers. Please inform us if you do not want your
message published.

Corrections:  The public editor's office looks into claims of error on
any and all platforms on which the  Star publishes. The Star corrects
significant errors of fact. When we determine a correction is called
for, it will be published as soon as possible; the article will also
be corrected online and a correction appended. Generally, news
corrections are published on page A2 and corrections for other
sections (including Sports, Entertainment and Life)  are published in
those sections. Corrections are also published online:
https://www.thestar.com/opinion/corrections

Because many readers often point out the same error, we cannot notify
each person that we are publishing a correction. As well, because of
the volume of queries we receive, we are not always able to respond to
explain why we determined no correction is necessary. Every query
about a possible error is considered thoroughly however. We  thank all
readers  who take the time to help the Star report accurately.

Unpublishing: Generally, the Star does not delete (unpublish) content
from our websites or archives, except in some rare circumstances
following consultation with the editor-in-chief, managing editor, and
in some cases, legal counsel. In the case of verified errors, we will
correct/update the article and/or append corrections as necessary but
will not remove it from the Star' s digital  publishing record.

General feedback about coverage: If you are writing to express your
view of the Star's coverage, your message will be forwarded to the
appropriate department. Because of the volume of email we receive,
neither the public editor's office, nor the journalists in specific
departments, can respond to every reader comment about the Star's
coverage.

Letters to the Editor: If you want your comments expressing your view
considered for publication as a Letter to the Editor, please resend
your message to lettertoed@thestar.ca<mailto:lettertoed@thestar.ca>.
Letters must include full name, address and all phone numbers of
sender (daytime, evening and cellphone). Street names and phone
numbers will not be published. The Star reserves the right to edit
letters, which typically run 50-150 words. Please note: The Star
receives many more letters than it has  space to print. Due to the
volume, we unfortunately cannot acknowledge every submission.

Submissions to the Star: Commentaries, opinion pieces, story pitches
and press releases should be submitted to the section of the Star to
which they are best suited. A full list of departments is published on
the "Contact Us" page of the Star's website:
https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

How to reach a Star journalist: Most staff members, including
reporters, editors, columnists and photographers, can be reached by
email. In most cases the email address follows this formula (all lower
case, don't type spaces or the plus sign): first initial + last name
@thestar.ca. You can also reach staff in the Editorial department
(newsroom) via phone at 416-869-4300 or fax at 416-869-4328. Editorial
staff members can also be contacted within the department they work
for. To reach a freelance writer, please contact the section in which
his or her article appeared.

Subscriptions/Customer Service: The public editor's office handles
concerns about editorial content only.  For home delivery
subscriptions, delivery problems, billing inquiries and other customer
service matters, please email
circmail@thestar.ca<mailto:circmail@thestar.ca>. You may also go to
our Subscription page<http://www.thestar.com/about/subscribe.html> for
home delivery information.

Further information about how to contact other departments in the Star
can be found here: https://www.thestar.com/about/contactus.html

Thank you for reading your Toronto Star.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Leger, Louis (PO/CPM)"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 17:21:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango
and Andy Douglas should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their
article published on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Bonjour, et merci pour votre courriel.  Je consulterai ma boîte de
réception périodiquement; pour les questions urgentes, veuillez
contacter Laura Peasey au Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca ou 506-230-1364 pour
l’assistance.

Hello and thank you for your email.  I will be checking my inbox only
periodically; for pressing matters please contact Laura Peasey at
Laura.Peasey@gnb.ca or 506-230-1364 for assistance.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 14:20:27 -0300
Subject: Methinks the "Frank" buddies Paul Palango and Andy Douglas
should read yesterday's Telegraph Journal and their article published
on my birthday 40 years ago N'esy Pas?
To: james.lockyer@umoncton.ca, jlockyer@lzzdefence.ca,
megan.mitton@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
ernie.steeves@gnb.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"
<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
Tori.Weldon@cbc.ca, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca,
Newsroom@globeandmail.com, infoam@fredericton.cbc.ca,
briangallant10@gmail.com, MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
David.Akin@globalnews.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>, "Pineo, Robert"
<rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "Sean.Fraser"
<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Louis.Leger"<Louis.Leger@gnb.ca>,
"mary.wilson"<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "Moiz.Karimjee"<Moiz.Karimjee@ontario.ca>,
"Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, andrew
<andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, "darren.campbell"
<darren.campbell@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Michael.Gorman"
<Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca>, "michael.macdonald"
<michael.macdonald@thecanadianpress.com>, "Rhonda.Brown"
<Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca>, sheilagunnreid
<sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, jesse
<jesse@viafoura.com>, publiced@thestar.ca, newsroom@therecord.com,
stevemckinley@thestar.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, paulpalango
<paulpalango@protonmail.com>, NightTimePodcast
<NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, nsinvestigators
<nsinvestigators@gmail.com>

https://tj.news/telegraph-journal/101923082

'Trying to get their life back': Portapique in recovery

The appearance of normalcy in Portapique region should not be confused
with the absence of lingering trauma, according to Colchester North
MLA Tom Taggart. He was born and raised in Portapique and served as
municipal councillor at the time of the mass shooting.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:50:02 +0000
Subject: FRANK MAGAZINE TODAY
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>



FRANK MAGAZINE JULY 20, 2022


THE LOCKYER FACTOR


by Paul Palango

Top Mountie in area of N.S. mass shooting stayed home to avoid command confusion


 
HALIFAX — The senior RCMP officer in the district where the Nova Scotia mass shooting occurred says he stayed home during the rampage because having a "white shirt" present at the command post would have caused confusion.

In his interview last month with the public inquiry, Archie Thompson, who retired about six months after the April 18-19, 2020, killings, said if he had left his home about 90 kilometres south of the command post and driven to the scene, it would have raised questions about who was running the operation.

At the time, the veteran officer had been superintendent in charge of the RCMP's Northeast Nova district for almost four months, and he wore the white shirt of a commissioned officer.

In his interview released Friday by the inquiry, Thompson outlined difficulties reaching his second-in-command for the district, Staff Sgt. Steve Halliday, on the phone during some of the tension-filled moments as the killer drove a replica police cruiser on April 19 and continued his murders in the Wentworth area.

Twenty-two people, including a pregnant woman, would die before police shot the perpetrator at a gas station in Enfield, N.S.

Thompson said his notes indicated that at 9:52 a.m. on April 19, Halliday sent him a message saying "shots fired," and then was unable to provide a further update as he was busy. Thompson said that more than an hour later, at 10:57 a.m., Halliday sent another message saying, "We have major issues," and telephoned his commander 15 minutes later to relay information about additional deaths.

However, Thompson said being present at the command post where Halliday was assisting Staff Sgt. Jeff West, the critical incident commander, wouldn't have helped.

"I wouldn't want to do that and inject myself into the investigation .... The rank, the colour of the uniform tends to have an impact when I show up," he said.

While the retired superintendent said it was his role to "get the resources moving along if required," he said through the night he heard that the RCMP officers on the scene had sufficient personnel.

Asked by the commission lawyer if he should have been at the scene to determine this, Thompson responded that he didn't believe that would be the normal procedure.

Thompson's interview also indicated that he was among those asked by Halliday the morning of April 19 to look into notifying the public that police had learned the killer was armed and driving a replica RCMP vehicle.

Halliday testified in May that he confirmed the replica vehicle was still unaccounted for at 7:55 a.m. on April 19, and had noted at about 8 a.m. "this has to be communicated out to the (RCMP) members, all municipal agencies, police departments and border crossings and we have to get it out to the public as soon as possible."

Thompson's notes say that at 8:22 a.m., he and Halliday "discussed the need to ensure this information was made public," and six minutes later, he called Chief Supt. Chris Leather, the second-highest ranking officer in the province, to provide "an update" and get a number for Lia Scanlan, the director of strategic operations.

Thompson said he called Scanlan at 8:39 a.m. and informed her about the marked police car, and she agreed she would call a sergeant at the command post. Thompson told the public inquiry lawyer he then left the matter with her, and said it was her department's responsibility.

Halliday testified in May that he was surprised the message about the replica vehicle didn't go out to the public until 10:17 a.m., more than two hours after his notes recorded he wanted this to occur.

Lawyers for family members have criticized the delay, noting that during the extra hours of delay at least six people were killed on April 19.

The inquiry has said that the precise role Leather may have played in the delay is unclear and in a summary it published May 17 said that inquiry staff were still investigating Leather's role in this. He is expected to testify before the inquiry next week.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 22, 2022.

Michael Tutton, The Canadian Press

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/rcmp-24-hour-trial-clarenville-coverage-on-call-1.4542011 

 

Around-the-clock policing left small detachments 'stretched pretty thin': RCMP

24-hour policing experiment ends in Clarenville, Marystown but continues in Grand Falls-Windsor

 

CBC News · Posted: Feb 19, 2018 8:30 PM NT

 

 Superintendent Archie Thompson oversees 17 police detachments for the RCMP in Newfoundland and Labrador. (Mike Rudyk/CBC)

Clarenville has 14 RCMP officers, while the Marystown detachment has 21 and the Grand Falls-Windsor detachment has 27.

You need your days off to recharge your batteries.- Superintendent Archie Thompson

 


---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:47:09 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or journalist
or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were ethical they
would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect their own
interests N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest.
Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus%5dwww.canada.ca/coronavirus>

If you, a family member, relative, or friend is abroad and needs
assistance, please visit contact 1-613-996-8885, email
sos@international.gc.ca, or visit:
https://travel.gc.ca/assistance/emergency-assistance?_ga=2.172986851.1318157851.1584477702-1658130046.1584477702

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**

Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "Drouin, Nathalie (BRQ)"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:46:27 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Veuillez noter que je suis absente pour une période indeterminée, sans
accès à mes courriels. Je vous invite à communiquer par courriel avec
mon adjointe Irène Ghobril à Irène.Ghobril@justice.gc.ca ou Me Annie
Van Der Meerscheen à Annie.VanDerMeerscheen. Merci.

Please note that I am away for an indefinite period, with no access to
my e-mails. Please contact by e-mail my assistant Irène Ghobril at
Irene.Ghobril@justice.gc.ca or Me Annie Van Der Meerscheen at
Annie.VanDerMeerscheen@justice.gc.ca. Thank you.

NOTIFICATION ÉLECTRONIQUE: NotificationPGC-AGC.Civil@justice.gc.ca


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:46:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or journalist
or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were ethical they
would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect their own
interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)"<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:46:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or journalist
or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were ethical they
would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect their own
interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are
greatly valued.  You can be assured that all emails and letters are
carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
If your issue is Constituency related, please contact Lisa Bourque at
my constituency office at
Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca<mailto:Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca>  or  (506) 755-2810.
Thank you.


Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous
tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Si c’est au sujet du bureau de circonscription,  veuillez contacter
Lisa Bourque  à  Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca<mailto:Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca>  ou
(506)755-2810.
Merci.

Andrea Anderson-Mason, Q.C. / c.r.

​​

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Campbell, Tyler (ECO/BCE)"<Tyler.Campbell@gnb.ca>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 22:46:28 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or journalist
or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were ethical they
would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect their own
interests N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I am currently out of the office and will be returning on July 13.

Please contact Amanda Brown (amanda.brown@gnb.ca) for assistance.

***
Je suis actuellement en congé et je reviendrai le 13 juillet.

Veuillez contacter Amanda Brown (amanda.brown@gnb.ca) pour obtenir de l'aide.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:46:26 -0700
Subject: Out of the office Re: Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or
journalist or professor or politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were
ethical they would have blown the whistle by now if only to protect
their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you for your message.

I am currently out of the office and not responding to emails at this time.

I will respond to any messages upon my return on June 29.

All the best,
Nathalie

--


*Nathalie Sturgeon *
Reporter, Telegraph-Journal | Brunswick News Inc.
------------------------------

Mobile: 506-466-8150
sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com
https://tj.news
------------------------------


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:46:23 -0300
Subject: Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or journalist or professor or
politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were ethical they would have blown
the whistle by now if only to protect their own interests N'esy Pas?
To: Mario.Maillet@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, tj <tj@burkelaw.ca>,
"tyler.campbell"<tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon.
(JAG/JPG)"<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>, nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, Nathalie
Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "Norman.Bosse"
<Norman.Bosse@gnb.ca>, "Roger.Brown"<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones"
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Cote"
<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>,
"Ginette.PetitpasTaylor"<Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>, Office
of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Shawn @ The Manatee"
<shawn@themanatee.net>, "Tim.RICHARDSON"<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>,
"andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/06/as-calls-to-defund-police-grow-some-say.html


Saturday, 27 June 2020
As calls to 'defund' police grow, some say it's time for the RCMP to do less

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others

Methinks if just 1 RCMP member or journalist or professor or
politician or lawyer or bureaucrat were ethical they would have blown
the whistle by now if only to protect their own interests N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/06/as-calls-to-defund-police-grow-some-say.html


#nbpoli #cdnpoli


https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rcmp-contract-policing-defund-1.5626544


As calls to 'defund' police grow, some say it's time for the RCMP to do less
Public Safety is reviewing the RCMP's role in regional and municipal policing

Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Jun 27, 2020 4:00 AM ET


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 08:46:38 -0300
Subject: Re: Attn Sgt. Mario Maillet I just called and introduced
myself Correct? Now how about an honest answer in writing as to the
whereabouts of my Harley and the Yankee wiretap tapes?
To: Mario.Maillet@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca,
Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca




---------- Original message ----------
From: Brenda Lucki <brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 13:06:51 -0400
Subject: Re: RE My calls AGAIN today about WAR, MURDER, MONEY,
TAXATION and George Soros and Iggy versus Sebastian Kurz and Viktor
Orbán etc (Away on Leave - En congé)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Bonjour - Hello

I am currently away on holidays, and will return Tuesday, March 27th. If
you require assistance during my absence, please contact Cpl. Roshan
Pinto at 639-625-3577 or Nicole Yandon at 639-625-3066.  I will be
checking my e-mails periodically.

Je suis présentement en congé de retour au bureau mardi, le 27  mars.
Pour toute demande urgente, veuillez communiquer avec Cap. Roshan Pinto
au 639-625-3577 ou Nicole Yandon au 639-625-3066.  Je vais vérifier mon
courrier électronique périodiquement.

Brenda

>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 03/12/18 11:06 >>>

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/abt-apd/org.html

Paul Rochon Deputy Minister:
Finance Canada
90 Elgin St.
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0G5
Phone: 613-369-4434

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:55:47 +0000
Subject: RE: RE My calls today about George Soros versus Sebastian
Kurz and Viktor Orbán
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 18:56:26 +0000
Subject: Re: RE My calls today about George Soros versus Sebastian
Kurz and Viktor Orbán
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 15:11:34 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE My calls today about George Soros versus Sebastian
Kurz and Viktor Orbán
To: informacio.was@mfa.gov.hu
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Address not found
Your message wasn't delivered to Was.missions@kum.hu because the
address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 15:05:51 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE My calls today about George Soros versus Sebastian
Kurz and Viktor Orbán
To: Was.missions@kum.hu, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, djtjr
<djtjr@trumporg.com>, lionel <lionel@lionelmedia.com>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 14:54:06 -0400
Subject: RE My calls today about George Soros versus Sebastian Kurz
and Viktor Orbán
To: "mission.ott"<mission.ott@mfa.gov.hu>, ottawa-ob@bmeia.gv.at,
austrianconsulatehfx@breakhouse.ca, miniszterelnok@mk.gov.hu,
mk@mk.gov.hu
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "George.Soros"
<George.Soros@opensocietyfoundations.org>, mdcohen212@gmail.com,
postur <postur@for.is>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
"bill.pentney"<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, rmellish
<rmellish@cbcl.ca>

https://twitter.com/sebastiankurz/with_replies

Sebastian Kurz
‏Verified account @sebastiankurz
6 hours ago

Konnte mich heute erstmals mit der  Personalvertretung im
Bundeskanzleramt treffen. Danke für den guten Austausch - freue mich
sehr auf die Zusammenarbeit!
Translated from German by Bing

Could meet today for the first time with the staff in the Chancellor's
Office. Thank you for sharing good - look forward to cooperation!
2 replies 2 retweets 15 likes


https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies


David Raymond Amos
‏ @DavidRayAmos 5 hours ago
Replying to @sebastiankurz

Did anyone mention my name yet?

David Raymond Amos
‏ @DavidRayAmos 8 hours ago
Replying to @sebastiankurz

I just called your Foreign Minister's Office +43 50 11 50 0 to offer
my assistance & his staff refused to listen Perhaps sor Viktor Orban
should call back 902 800 0369 so I can explain
@realDonaldTrump #FBI & missing hearing records ASAP

https://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=90F8E691-9065-4F8C-A465-72722B47E7F2


https://www.bmeia.gv.at/en/contact-us/

Federal Ministry for Europe, Integration and Foreign Affairs

Minoritenplatz 8, 1010 Vienna

Tel. +43 (0) 50 11 50 - 0


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Ügyfélszolgálat (BM)"<ugyfelszolgalat@bm.gov.hu>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:06:36 +0000
Subject: Valasz
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Tisztelt Feladó!

Tájékoztatjuk, hogy elektronikus levelét fogadta a Belügyminisztérium
levelezőrendszere, megérkezett az
ugyfelszolgalat@bm.gov.hu<mailto:ugyfelszolgalat@bm.gov.hu> címre.
A jogszabályban meghatározott időn belül válaszolunk levelére, illetve
továbbítjuk a címzett személynek vagy hivatali szervezetnek.
Kérjük szíves türelmét a válasz megérkezéséig.

Ez egy automatikus üzenet, kérjük, ne válaszoljon rá!


BM Ügyfélszolgálat

________________________________

Ezen üzenet és annak bármely csatolt anyaga bizalmas, jogi védelem
alatt áll, a nyilvános közléstől védett. Az üzenetet kizárólag a
címzett, illetve az általa meghatalmazottak használhatják fel. Ha Ön
nem az üzenet címzettje, úgy kérjük, hogy telefonon, vagy e-mail-ben
értesítse erről az üzenet küldőjét és törölje az üzenetet, valamint
annak összes csatolt mellékletét a rendszeréből. Ha Ön nem az üzenet
címzettje, abban az esetben tilos az üzenetet vagy annak bármely
csatolt mellékletét lemásolnia, elmentenie, az üzenet tartalmát
bárkivel közölnie vagy azzal visszaélnie.

This message and any attachment are confidential and are legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If
you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the
sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system.
Please note that any dissemination, distribution, copying or use of or
reliance upon the information contained in and transmitted with this
e-mail by or to anyone other than the recipient designated above by
the sender is unauthorised and strictly prohibited.


Viktor Orbán Prime Minister
Postal address: 1357 Budapest, Pf. 6.
E-mail: miniszterelnok@mk.gov.hu
Website: www.orbanviktor.hu

http://www.kormany.hu/hu/elerhetosegek

Antal Rogán
Head of Cabinet of the Prime Minister
Postal address: 1357 Budapest, Pf. 1.
Phone: +36 1 896 1747
Fax: +36 1 795 0893
E-mail: mk@mk.gov.hu

https://ottawa.mfa.gov.hu/eng/contact/generated

Ambassador Dr. Bálint Ódor
Phone +1 (613) 230-2717
Email mission.ott@mfa.gov.hu
Trade and Investment +1 (613) 230-2717/210

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/print_2149.html

Hungary Washington DC Embassy.
Address: 3910 Shoemaker Street, N.W..
Washington ,DC 20008.
Phone: 1-202--362-6730

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:24:08 -0400
Subject: Fwd: ATTN Péter Szijjártó RE Trump and George Soros et al I
have
been trying to talk to people working for Hungarian Prime Minister for
years
To: sajto@keh.hu, sonja.wintersberger@unvienna.org,
anne.thomas@unvienna.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.unis.unvienna.org/unis/en/pressrels/2011/unisinf410.html


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:09:13 +0000
Subject: RE: ATTN Péter Szijjártó RE Trump and George Soros et al I have
been trying to talk to people working for Hungarian Prime Minister for
years
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 12:10:40 +0000
Subject: Re: ATTN Péter Szijjártó RE Trump and George Soros et al I have
been trying to talk to people working for Hungarian Prime Minister for
years
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office


---------- Original  message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:07:54 -0400
Subject: ATTN Péter Szijjártó RE Trump and George Soros et al I have
been
trying to talk to people working for Hungarian Prime Minister for years
To: intcomm@mk.gov.hu, "George.Soros"
<George.Soros@opensocietyfoundations.org>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, mcohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>,
"Diane.Lebouthillier"<Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca>,
"Diane.Lebouthillier"<Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca>, RT-US
<RT-US@rttv.ru>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, birgittaj
<birgittaj@althingi.is>, postur <postur@for.is>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
president <president@whitehouse.gov>, "boris.johnson.mp"
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, "Andrew.Bailey"
<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, news
<news@kingscorecord.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Whereas you were appointed to State Secretary for Foreign Affairs and
External Economic Relations of the Prime Minister’s Office.you above
all should understand why I have  an issue with Banksters since well
before George W Bush was first elected while Trump judged Beauty
Queens and managed marry one from your neck of the woods

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/hungary-sheds-bankers-shackles-by.html

Tuesday, 27 August 2013
Hungary Sheds Bankers' Shackles | By Ronald L. Ray

You are  also saying some very important things lately about politcs
and George Soros and Donald Trump

BREAKING : George Soros ARREST On The Table ? Hungarian Foreign Minister
TNTV Total News T.V
Published on Jan 30, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kin3r_H8w8

HOWEVER SO AM I AND I DID CALL YOUR OFFICE TODAY FROM A POOR
CONNECTION AND WAS TOLD TO CALL THESE NUMBERS

36 1 458 1240
36 1 458 1844

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN OR CHECK YOUR TWITTER ACCOUNT AND MINE ASAP

Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade
Head office: 1027 Budapest, Bem rakpart 47.
Postal address: 1027 Budapest, Bem rakpart 47.
Phone: +36-1-458-1000
Fax: +36-1-212-5918
Péter Szijjártó, Minister of Foreign Affairs and Trade

Postal address: 1027 Budapest, Bem rakpart 47.
Phone: +36-1-458-1178, +36-1-458-1253
Fax: +36-1-375-3766

International Communications Office

E-mail: intcomm@mk.gov.hu
Phone:
+36 1 896 1905


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 08:45:26 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Billy Morneau RE FATCA and NAFTA Perhaps you and your
friend Mikey Cohen or even big talking Sherry Peel Jackson should talk
to me before Trump and Trudeau upset the Mexicans even more EH?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
called and lefTo: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
directed to 646-853-0114.
________________________________
This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
electronic signature under applicable law.


>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 00:14:35 +000
> Subject: RE: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing today in
> Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the Queen's sneaky
> little minions who think they are above the law and the rest of us as
well
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR postur@for.is
> Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 00:15:21 +0000
> Subject: Re: Here ya go folks please enjoy the hearing today in
> Federal Court and the notes I read from as I argued the Queen's sneaky
> little minions who think they are above the law and the rest of us as
> well
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
>
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
>
http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
most
>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> D> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>
>
> Vertias Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Kulik, John"<john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 17:37:49 +0000
> Subject: McInnes Cooper
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate
> with our firm, please do so through me.
>
> Thank you.
>
> John Kulik
> [McInnes Cooper]<http://www.mcinnescooper.com/>
>
> John Kulik Q.C.
> Partner & General Counsel
> McInnes Cooper
>
> tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350
>
> 1969 Upper Water Street
> Suite 1300
> Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1
>
> asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215
>
>
>
> Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential
> and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended
> only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or
> telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues
> dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont
> confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client.
> Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si
> vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur
> par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too
late
> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com,
mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.ca,
> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.ca,
> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do
>
>
http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/35072/FM030_Respondent_Attorney-General-of-Canada-on-Behalf-of-the-United-States-of-America.pdf
>
>
http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,
leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : W> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
> Visit Number 29,419
>
>
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
>
> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it
yet
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
> To:  randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>
> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
> Conservatives
>
>
> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>
> Here is why
>
>
http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
>
> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
> following file
>
>
http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
> http://occupywallst.org/users/DavidRaymondAmos/
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Hansen, David"David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello Mr. Amos,
>
> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
> region.  We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
> defendant or plaintiff.  If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
> and your question.  I am not the appropriate contact for other
> matters.
>
> Thanks
>
> David A. Hansen
> Regional Director | Directeur régional
> General Counsel |Avocat général
> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
> services de consultation
> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
> B3J 1P3
> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
> 426-2329
> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
> this entire e-mail.
> Before printing think about the Environment
> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked
to
>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com,
shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.commvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>>
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>>
http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach"rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau Wh>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Clemet1@parl.gc.ca,
maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org,
whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.cajustin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>
> First things first have a Look at the 3 documents hereto attached (Not
> a big read)
>
> Listen to these old voicemails from interesting FEDS at about  the
> same point in time (Won't take long)
>
> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>
> then ask youselves or the lawyers Senator Shelby or Spizter or Cutler
> or Bernie madoff's old buddy Robert Glauber where the webcast and
> transcript went for a very important hearing held in late 2003 by the
> United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
>
>
http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=90F8E691-9065-4F8C-A465-72722B47E7F2
>
> Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
> Mutual Fund Industry
>
> November 20, 2003 02:00 PM
> The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
> series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
> Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
>
>     Archived Webcast
>
> Witness Panel 1
>
> Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>     Director - Division of Enforcement
>     Securities and Exchange Commission
>     cutler.pdf (175.5 KBs)
>
> Mr. Robert Glauber
>     Chairman and CEO
>     National Association of Securities Dealers
>     glauber.pdf (171.1 KBs)
>
> Eliot Spitzer
>     Attorney General
>     State of New York
>     spitzer.pdf (68.2 KBs)
>
> Permalink:
>
http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2003/11/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
>
>
> Trust that the evil women and men that  PM Trudeau "The Younger"
> appointed to to his cabinet will continue to play dumb because of
> their oath to The Privy Council. However it does not follow that
> everybody who works for them are dumb and they have no such oath to
> uphold N'esy Pas?.
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lisa Porteous <lporteous@kleinlyons.com>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:46:22 +0000
> Subject: RCMP
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> David,
>
> Thank you for your email inquiring about our class action against the
> RCMP. As you may know, the Notice of Claim was filed in the Brit> brought by former RCMP constable Janet Merlo on behalf of female RCMP
> members. Unfortunately, we cannot assist you with your claim.
>
> We recommend that you contact Mr. Barry Carter of Mair Jensen Blair
> LLP to discuss any claim you may have against the RCMP for harassment.
> His contact information is as follows:
>
> Mr. Barry Carter
> Mair Jensen Blair LLP
> 1380-885 W. Georgia Street
> Vancouver, BC V6C 3E8
> Phone: 604-682-6299
> Fax 1-604-374-6992
>
> This is not intended to be an opinion concerning the merits of your
> case. In declining to represent you, we are not expressing an opinion
> as to whether you should take further action in this matter.
>
> You should be aware that there may be strict time limitations within
> which you must act in order to protect your rights. Failure to begin
> your lawsuit by filing an action within the required time may mean
> that you could be barred forever from pursuing a claim. Therefore, you
> should immediately contact another lawyer ( as indicated above) to
> obtain legal advice/representation.
>
> Thank you again for considering our firm.
>
> Yours truly,
>
> Lisa Porteous
> Case Manager/Paralegal
>
> lporteous@kleinlyons.com
> www.kleinlyons.com
>
> KLEIN ∙ LYONS
> Suite 400-1385 West 8th Avenue
> Vancouver BC V6H 3V9 Canada
> Office 604.874.7171
> Fax 604.874.7180
> Direct 604.714.6533
>
> This email is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
> privilege. It is intended only for the use of the person to whom it is
> addressed. Any distribution, copying or other use by anyone else is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> telephone us immediately and destroy this e-mail.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/darren-campbell-notes-mass-casualty-commission-disclosure-1.6498991 

 

Senior Mountie's controversial notes about commissioner held back for months, inquiry says

Mass Casualty Commission says 4 pages of Supt. Darren Campbell’s notes missing from initial disclosure

The key section included allegations the head of the RCMP promised politicians the force would release information about guns used during the April 2020 rampage.

The Mass Casualty Commission said the federal government sent 132 pages of Supt. Darren Campbell's handwritten notes in mid-February 2022, but that the file had no references to a meeting with Commissioner Brenda Lucki on April 28, 2020.

Three weeks ago, the inquiry received a second file of Campbell's notes for the same time period. The package included the pages Campbell wrote about a conference call he and other senior officers in Nova Scotia had with Lucki.

It happened just over a week after a gunman disguised as a Mountie killed 22 people, including a pregnant woman, injured others and destroyed several homes by fire.

Twenty-two people died on April 18 and 19, 2020. Top row from left: Gina Goulet, Dawn Gulenchyn, Jolene Oliver, Frank Gulenchyn, Sean McLeod, Alanna Jenkins. Second row: John Zahl, Lisa McCully, Joey Webber, Heidi Stevenson, Heather O'Brien and Jamie Blair. Third row from top: Kristen Beaton, Lillian Campbell, Joanne Thomas, Peter Bond, Tom Bagley and Greg Blair. Bottom row: Emily Tuck, Joy Bond, Corrie Ellison and Aaron Tuck. (CBC)

In the previously undisclosed pages, Campbell wrote that Lucki was displeased with the local commanders for not releasing information about the makes and models of guns used in the attacks, details that he felt could risk jeopardizing the investigation into how the shooter obtained his weapons.

RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki denies a claim by a fellow Mountie that she tried to direct the information investigators released as part of their probe into the 2020 mass shooting in Nova Scotia. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/blair-lucki-nova-scotia-shooting-gun-control-1.6496511

In May 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a ban on some 1,500 makes and models of guns, including the two of the guns used in the Nova Scotia mass shooting. At that time, police had not released the specific makes and models used in the attacks.

Campbell's allegation that Lucki had made commitments to Trudeau and then-public safety minister Bill Blair in advance of new gun control legislation ignited a political firestorm in Ottawa this week, with opposition MPs demanding an investigation into the possibility of political interference.

Both Blair and Trudeau have denied doing so and stated the RCMP makes its own decisions about releasing information.

Lucki has also denied she would interfere with a police investigation, but did not address the claim she wanted to release more information in advance of the Liberals' plan to introduce new gun control legislation in May 2020.

Campbell and Lucki are expected to be called as witnesses at the inquiry late next month. They've also been summoned to appear before a parliamentary hearing in Ottawa at the end of July to address allegations of potential political interference.

Barbara McLean, investigations director with the commission, said in a statement to CBC News that the commission is seeking an explanation from the Department of Justice about why four pages were missing from the original disclosure.

She added that it is "demanding an explanation for any further material that has been held back" in cases where the commission was not aware it was happening.

"The commission is seeking assurance that nothing else has been held back as per direction from subpoenas," McLean said.

Files subpoenaed last June

The commission said it first asked for all the RCMP's investigative files related to the probe into the April 2020 massacre through a subpoena on June 15, 2021.

In response, it has received thousands of pages of documents and files have come in "on a rolling basis" and staff "followed up regularly on items that had not yet been received."

"These documents have often been provided in a disjointed manner that has required extensive commission team review," McLean said, adding that staff review everything "carefully for any gaps or additional information."

Conservatives continue to press Liberal over claims of interference in NS shooting investigation

1 month ago
Duration 1:05
Conservative MP Stephen Ellis questions Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair over allegations the Liberal government pressed for details of the shooter's weapons so info could be used as part of bid for tougher gun laws.

CBC News learned of the discrepancy because the joint federal and provincial inquiry initially posted 132 pages of Campbell's notes on its website last week and that file had no mention of the Lucki meeting.

But the commission quoted Campbell's comments about Lucki in a document released Tuesday summarizing how the RCMP communicated with the public in the months after the shootings. A 136-page file containing Campbell's additional notes — including that April meeting — was shared with journalists under an embargo in advance. They have since been posted on the commission's website

 Supt. Darren Campbell with the Nova Scotia RCMP took extensive handwritten notes of a meeting he and other local officials had with Commissioner Brenda Lucki on April 28, 2020. (Mass Casualty Commission)

Justice Department statement

In a statement issued Friday evening, the Justice Department said that it sent more than 2,000 pages of notes from senior officers on Feb. 11, 2022, and March 2, 2022. Some pages, including the four pages of Campbell's notes in question, required assessment for whether they were privileged.

The statement said the review determined the pages were not privileged, and they were provided to the commission without redactions on May 30, 2022.

"While it is a usual practice to review documents for privilege before disclosure, the Commission was not advised that some pages of the notes of senior officers were being reviewed for privilege," said the statement.

"Department of Justice counsel should have done so and will work with the Commission to establish a process for review."

Campbell hasn't been interviewed

The Mass Casualty Commission has yet to speak to Campbell directly about his allegations.

As the officer in charge of support services overseeing units including the tactical team and major crimes unit, Campbell was the Nova Scotia RCMP's main spokesperson in three press conferences held in late April and June 2020. He also met with many of the families of people killed.

Campbell said in a statement Thursday to CBC News that he has "been waiting for some time to be interviewed by the Mass Casualty Commission" and that it'll happen soon. He also said he looks forward to testifying.

"As such, it would be inappropriate for me to make any public comments prior to giving evidence under oath," Campbell said.

Months ago, the commissioners overseeing the joint federal and provincial inquiry said they expected to ask Campbell to testify, along with former Asst. Commissioner Lee Bergerman, who has since retired from the role she held as the commanding officer of the Nova Scotia RCMP, and Chief Supt. Chris Leather, who was the second in command in April 2020.

'Monumental task' of combing through documents

Rob Pineo, a lawyer who represents families of 14 people killed in the mass shooting as well as others who have been affected by it, said the discrepancy in Campbell's notes is "definitely concerning but certainly not surprising given how information has rolled out during this inquiry process."

The Mass Casualty Commission typically shares its documents with participants, including the lawyers representing families, prior to releasing the information to the public. But Pineo said some witnesses who have testified before the commission have shared their background interviews and relevant records.

He attributes this to an unrealistic timeline set when the two levels of government established the commission in the fall of 2020 and set a deadline of November of this year for the inquiry's final report.

 Rob Pineo is a lawyer at Patterson Law and represents families of 14 people killed in the mass shooting, as well as others who have been affected by it. (CBC)

"We feel that the timeframe, the goalposts that were set for this inquiry, didn't allow enough time for the information and evidence to be properly vetted and disclosed," he said.

Going through the thousands of pages of records has been a "monumental task" even for the large team involved at his firm, Pineo said.

"In a regular court setting we would have months, maybe years, to digest evidence and work through legal theories. Here we usually have a matter of days or weeks," he said.

The commission said in its interim report that by late March it had issued 70 subpoenas, including many to the RCMP, for both documents and for witnesses to appear.

Campbell, Leather leaving N.S.

Campbell and Leather are both leaving Nova Scotia, Nova Scotia RCMP confirmed Friday.

Campbell was promoted to chief superintendent and will be working in New Brunswick in the coming weeks. He'll be the interim core policing criminal operations officer for J Division.

Leather is joining the federal policing modernization team at RCMP National Headquarters in Ottawa in the coming months.

Neither Campbell or Leather have begun their new roles.

WATCH | In June 2020, Supt. Darren Campbell shared details about what investigators had learned about gunman's motivations and mindset: 

RCMP offer new information about the Nova Scotia shooter's motivations, mindset and reasons for liquidating his assets

2 years ago
Duration 5:42
RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell receives updates about the Nova Scotia mass shooting investigation through his role as support services officer.

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/blair-lucki-nova-scotia-shooting-gun-control-1.6496511

 

Top Mountie denies claim she interfered in N.S. shooting investigation

Conservatives accusing Liberals of using the deaths of Canadians to push political agenda

The head of the RCMP is denying a claim by a fellow Mountie that she tried to direct the information investigators released as part of their probe into the 2020 mass shooting in Nova Scotia.

That allegation was contained in handwritten notes from Nova Scotia RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell which were released Tuesday as part of the Mass Casualty Commission probe.

The commission is investigating the April 18-19, 2020, rampage that claimed the lives of 22 people — including a pregnant woman — and left several people injured and several homes destroyed. The commission released a report Tuesday on the way the RCMP and government communicated with the public about the incident.

In those notes, Campbell wrote that RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki was upset that the RCMP in Nova Scotia was not revealing more information about the weapons used because she had promised the federal government — which was considering gun control legislation at the time — that they would raise it.

"As a police officer, and the RCMP commissioner, I would never take actions or decisions that could jeopardize an investigation. I did not interfere in the ongoing investigations into the largest mass shooting in Canadian history," Lucki wrote in a statement released Tuesday evening.

WATCH Did Ottawa try to interfere in the investigation?

Did the government try to interfere in an RCMP investigation of the Nova Scotia mass shooting?

1 month ago
Duration 11:02
A report released by a public inquiry into the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting suggests RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki had promised the government to release information regarding the firearms used in the tragedy. MPs Taleeb Noormohamed and Raquel Dancho weigh in.

Lucki did not address the claim that she was pushing for the release of more information to help the Liberals' plans for gun control. She did say briefings with the minister of public safety are necessary, particularly during a mass shooting.

"This is standard procedure, and does not impact the integrity of ongoing investigations or interfere with the independence of the RCMP," she wrote.

"I take the principle of police independence extremely seriously, and it has been and will continue to be fully respected in all interactions."

Mountie feared release would 'jeopardize' investigation 

The allegation stems from an April 24, 2020 news conference. During that event, Campbell told reporters the gunman had two semi-automatic handguns and two semi-automatic rifles. He would not offer more details but said that some of the guns might have come from the United States and the Canada Border Services Agency was assisting with the investigation.

"The commissioner was obviously upset. She did not raise her voice but her choice of words was indicative of her overall dissatisfaction with our work," Campbell wrote after meeting with Lucki a few days later. His handwritten notes describing that meeting became part of the commission's investigation.

"The Commissioner said she had promised the Minister of Public Safety and the Prime Minister's Office that the RCMP (we) would release this information," Campbell continued. "I tried to explain there was no intent to disrespect anyone, however we could not release this information at this time. The Commissioner then said that we didn't understand, that this was tied to pending gun control legislation that would make officers and the public safer."

Then-Public Safety minister Bill Blair speaks with RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki as they wait to appear before a Commons committee on February 27, 2020 in Ottawa. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

In the spring of 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced a ban on some 1,500 firearm makes and models, including two of the guns used in the Nova Scotia mass shooting — a Colt Law Enforcement Carbine, a semi-automatic weapon, and a Ruger Mini-14.

At that time, police had not released the specific makes and models used in the attacks. That information didn't become public until the fall of 2020, when the National Post reported details of the weapons after obtaining a briefing note prepared for the prime minister after the shooting.

Campbell said he told the RCMP Strategic Communications Unit not to release information about the firearms because it might hamper the investigation.

"I said we couldn't because to do so would jeopardize ongoing efforts to advance the U.S. side of the case as well as the Canadian components of the investigation," he wrote.

"Those are facts and I stand by them."

Of the meeting with Lucki, Campbell wrote that some in the room "were reduced to tears and emotional over this belittling reprimand."

In her statement, Lucki said she regrets her behaviour in that meeting.

WATCH | Victims' families lash out at N.S. shooting inquiry: 

Angry victims’ families heard at N.S. shooting inquiry

1 month ago
Duration 4:57
Family members of the N.S. shooting victims expressed their frustration about how the RCMP handled telling them about what happened to their loved ones. Meanwhile, a report questioned whether the RCMP's top cop interfered with the release of some information because of promises to the Prime Minister's Office.

"Several days after the mass shooting, I met with Nova Scotia RCMP colleagues to discuss a number of things. This included the flow of information to RCMP National Headquarters on the investigation and the public release of information. It was a tense discussion, and I regret the way I approached the meeting and the impact it had on those in attendance," she said.

"My need for information should have been better weighed against the seriousness of the circumstances they were experiencing. I should have been more sensitive in my approach. Had I led the meeting differently, these employees would have felt more supported during what I know was an extremely difficult time."

Blair denies pressuring top Mountie

During a fiery round of questioning in the House of Commons Tuesday, Conservative MP Stephen Ellis accused Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair — who was public safety minister at the time — of using the deaths of Canadians to push the Liberals' political agenda.

Blair denied the allegation.

"The commissioner of the RCMP has confirmed for the commission that no such direction or pressure was ever exerted by me or by any other member of this government," he said.

The Conservatives continued to raise the issue during question period Tuesday, and Blair kept replying that the RCMP commissioner's police operations are independent of the government.

"Among the more important work of the Mass Casualty Commission is to examine the important communication challenges that were evident during this tragic event. We look forward to fact-based findings and recommendations for improvement," Blair said.

In a statement to CBC News, a spokesperson for Blair denied the minister had any involvement in RCMP decisions.

"At no time during his tenure … did Minister Blair or his office direct the RCMP in any of their operational decisions, including during and immediately following the tragic events in April 2020," the statement reads.

"The decision of what information to publicly disclose regarding any investigation, as with all operational matters, is taken solely at law enforcement's discretion."

The commission investigation has not released any notes from Lucki. She is expected to be called as a witness next month. 

"The RCMP continues to be an active participant in the MCC. I will be providing testimony in the coming weeks, and the RCMP will continue to support the Commission's important work," Lucki's statement says.

The Liberals last month tabled Bill C-21, which would impose a national freeze on the purchase, sale, importation and transfer of handguns in Canada.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Catharine Tunney is a reporter with CBC's Parliament Hill bureau, where she covers national security and the RCMP. She worked previously for CBC in Nova Scotia. You can reach her at catharine.tunney@cbc.ca

With files from Elizabeth McMillan

https://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/en/news/2020/speaking-remarks-supt-darren-campbell 

 

Speaking remarks: Supt. Darren Campbell

April 24, 2020
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia

Speech

Check against delivery

As Cpl. Clarke said, I am Superintendent Darren Campbell, Support Services Officer, Nova Scotia RCMP.

Before I begin and provide you with information related to the incidents as they unfolded, I want to first acknowledge those who lost their lives.

Twenty-two innocent people were killed at the hands of a gunman and three people were injured. To call this a tragedy is an understatement. Some of those who lost their lives did so while trying to save others. They are heroes.

I want to express my sincere condolences to all the families.

There are two elements that I would like to address before going through the incidents as they unfolded.

The incidents happened in rural Nova Scotia, Portapique is a community in Colchester County in the central part of the province. This is a small community, about 100 people live there year-round. The homes are set back from the road, some are old, others new and some are summer residences along the Bay of Fundy. This is a quiet community, there are no sidewalks or street lights.

The RCMP implements a Critical Incident Command structure when responding to complaints that may impact public safety. Highly skilled and trained officers come together as a team in order to direct emergency personnel and the multiple specialized policing units deployed when responding to a complaint.

These two elements are important to be aware of as I go through the timeline of the incidents.

The following details I will be sharing with you have been put together because of the benefit of hindsight, of knowing what happened. The police officers responding to the initial 911 call and the subsequent calls did not have the benefit of the knowledge I am about to share with you. The initial complaint was of a shooting.

To help explain the timeline I will be talking about three clusters of incidents. The first cluster was in Portapique on Saturday night. On Sunday, there was a second cluster of incidents in Wentworth, Glenholme, and Debert. And then, a third and final cluster in Shubenacadie, Milford and Enfield.

(Cluster one)

What we learned as part of the investigation is that on April 18 before the first call came in there was an assault between the gunman and a person known to him in Portapique.

The victim managed to escape from the gunman and hid overnight in the woods.

Following this, police received the first call to 911 with a report of a shooting at a home in Portapique.

Officers arrived at 10:26 p.m. where they located a male leaving the area with an apparent gunshot wound.

They learned that this man was shot while driving his vehicle.

The victim indicated a vehicle drove by him while he was driving and the shot came from the passing vehicle.

Officer arranged for EHS to attend to the victim and he was taken to hospital by EHS.

Several of their units responded to the area and upon arriving, located several people who were deceased lying in the roadway. There were also several structures already on fire.

In total there were over 7 locations where people were found deceased. Many of the deceased were discovered while responding members were checking homes for victims and/or suspects. At this time, police began looking at a number of possible suspects as a result of the information they were receiving.

While the situation was unfolding the Critical Incident Program was engaged and staging to take control of the critical incident.

During this point perimeters were established. Specialized Units responded including Police Dog Services, Emergency Response Teams and a DNR helicopter. We also had the Explosives Disposal Unit, crisis negotiators and the Emergency Medical Response Team on stand by. Within a very short time, we also engaged specialized units and resources from J Division in New Brunswick.

Over a lengthy period of time, first responders engaged in clearing residences, searching for suspects, providing life saving measures. Telecommunicators remained on the line with witnesses in the immediate area.

Fairly early into our involvement, we learned of a possible suspect and learned the individual lived in a home in the community of Portapique.

The possible suspect's home and garages were fully engulfed in flames. Two police vehicles as well as a third vehicle were also burning on the property.

We also learned that the gunman was in possession of a pistol and long barreled weapons. He was also known to own several vehicles that looked like police vehicles.

Our efforts to locate suspect continued throughout the night.

After 0630, at daybreak, a victim emerged from hiding after she called 911.

Our officers responded and it was at that time that, through a significant key witness, we confirmed more details about Gabriel Wortman. This included the fact that he was in possession of a fully marked and equipped replica vehicle and was wearing a police uniform. He was in possession of several firearms that included pistols and long guns.

At that time, we issued a BOLO (Be on the Look Out), a bulletin that included a description of the suspect and vehicle, to all police officers in Nova Scotia.

We maintained containment of the scene and continued to search for the suspect.

(Cluster 2)

More than 12 hours after our initial arrival in Portapique, we began receiving a second series of 911 calls in an area more than 60 km away.

Our investigation has revealed that the gunman attended a residence on Hunter Rd. in the Glenholme area.

At that location, the gunman killed two men and a woman and set residence on fire.

At least two of the victims here were known to the gunman.

Our investigation uncovered that the gunman then travelled to a residence on Hwy 4 in Glenholme.

He knocked on the door and awoke the residents. He was known to the occupants. They identified him to 911 call takers and said he was driving a police vehicle and carrying a long gun.

They didn't answer the door and he left.

The gunman continued southbound on Hwy 4 from Glenholme to the Wentworth area.

He encountered a woman out walking and shot the woman at roadside. He continued south towards Debert.

At that point he encountered two people driving their vehicles. A witness described that he pulled over one of the vehicles and shot one of the occupants. He continued driving down the same road, encountered a second vehicle and shot and killed that female victim.

During this second series of events, from the timing of the first call on Hunter Road to the last incident, it was about a distance of 44 kilometers.

(Cluster 3)

Cst. Morrison and Cst. Stevenson were communicating and arranged to meet. Cst. Morrison was waiting for Cst. Stevenson at Hwy 2 & Hwy 224. What appeared to be a marked RCMP vehicle approached Cst. Morrison. As they had prearranged to meet at that location, Cst. Morrison thought the vehicle was Cst. Stevenson.

The approaching police vehicle was actually driven by the gunman. The gunman pulled up beside Cst. Morrison and immediately opened fire. Cst. Morrison received several gunshot wounds and began to retreat from the area, driving his vehicle away from the scene. He notified other officers and dispatch that he was shot and that he was enroute to EHS station for emergency medical attention.

During that time, Cst. Heidi Stevenson was nearby in that area, believed to be driving northbound on Hwy 2 while the gunman was travelling southbound on Hwy 2. At that point, both vehicles collided head on. Cst. Heidi Stevenson engaged the gunman. The gunman took Cst. Stevenson's life. He also took Cst. Stevenson's gun and mags.

A passerby stopped and was fatally shot by the gunman. The gunman set both Cst. Stevenson's vehicle and the replica police vehicle on fire. He left the scene, driving south on Hwy 224 in the passerby's vehicle, which was described as a silver SUV.

The gunman travelled south on Hwy 224 for a short distance where he entered a home on the East Side of Hwy 224. That home happened to be the home of a woman known to the gunman. The gunman shot and killed the female resident.

The gunman then removed the police clothing he was wearing and transferred his weapons to the female victim's vehicle which was a red Mazda 3.

The gunman travelled south on HWY 224, coming to the Big Stop Irving in Enfield. While he was at the gas pumps, one of our tactical resources came into the gas station to refuel their vehicle. When the officer exited the vehicle, there was an encounter and the gunman was shot and killed by police at 11:26 a.m.

The distance the gunman travelled from the first shooting of Cst. Morrison to the encounter with police at the Big Stop is approx. 23 kms

The situations within the clusters of critical incidents were rapidly evolving, which has increased the complexity of investigating the horrific incidents.

Nova Scotia RCMP continue to ask for anyone who has information about any of these incidents to contact us. We are looking for photos, videos, and any other material that may help. No piece of information is too small, and if you have information we would like to hear from you.

We ask those with information to call the RCMP tip line at 1-902-720-5959. We've already gotten many tips and we thank the public for taking the time to reach out.

 

 

Maps - Speaking notes: Supt. Darren Campbell

April 24, 2020
Dartmouth, Nova Scotia

Speech

Map 1

Map of Nova Scotia highlighting the location of Wentworth, Portapique, Debert, Shubenacadie, Milford and Enfield and their proximity to Halifax.

Map 2

A topographical map of the region of Nova Scotia where shooting incidents occurred. Markers depict the locations and start times of incidents:

  • Portapique (10:26pm, April 18)
  • Wentworth (9:35am, April 19)
  • Debert (10:08am, April 19)
  • Shubenacadie (10:49am, April 19)
  • Enfield (approximately 11:26am, April 19)

Map 3

A closer view of the locations in Portapique, Nova Scotia where shooting incidents first occurred. Markers depict where victims were found on:

  • Portapique Beach Road
  • Orchard Beach Road
  • Bayview Court

Map 4

A close-up map of the area of Nova Scotia where shooting incidents occurred. Markers depict the locations where victims were found as well as the start time of each incident:

  • Portapique (11:26pm, April 18)
  • Wentworth (9:35am, April 19)
  • Debert (10:06 am, April 19)

Map 5

A close-up map of the locations in Shubenacadie, Nova Scotia where shooting incidents occurred. Markers depict where victims were found on Highway 2.

Map 6

A close-up map of the area of Nova Scotia where shooting incidents occurred. Markers depict the following locations where victims were found as well as the start time of the incident:

  • Milford (10:49am, April 19)
  • Enfield (approximately 11:26am, April 19)

Lisa LaFlamme's Latest Business Venture Sparks Tension With CTV & Bell Media Sponsors - She Fires Back Live On Air!

$
0
0

 

 https://bc.ctvnews.ca/beware-of-fake-ads-featuring-celebrities-1.5736520

 

Beware of fake ads featuring celebrities

 

 CTV chief anchor Lisa LaFlamme is not in the CBD business or endorsing CBD products.

VANCOUVER -

A pop-up ad on Facebook featuring CTV News anchor Lisa LaFlamme hooked Bonnie Meyer of Vancouver to click on an offer for CBD gummies.

"If she's endorsing them they've got to be good. You know I have nothing but total respect for Lisa LaFlamme," Meyer told CTV News.

She added that she thought she was going to get a free trial but the next day she noticed more than $300 in credit card charges from a company called Galaxy Primal CBD.

"Pay attention before you click," explained Simon Lis, Better Business Bureau president of Mainland B.C.

Lis said she's heard complaints about free trial offers before.

"The trick is once you sign up for this free offer, they ask you for a credit card, maybe for shipping. You may or may not get the product or when sometimes you do get the product, you start entering into this long standing agreement where now you're getting the product every month," she said.

Meyer received a lot of CBD product, which she says she did not want or order. In addition, she said she received more credit card charges and is now out $616.

As for celebrity endorsements?

Lisa LaFlamme tweeted out a warning last June about her name and likeness being used to promote CBD.

"It's fake," she wrote. "Please don't be fooled."

CTV News tried to get a comment from the company that Meyer says took the order, but got caught in a loop that led to no answers.

We called the number that Meyer says her credit card company gave her that was associated with the charges. A customer service representative answered and told us that they represent several different brands. However, he did acknowledge we were calling from a TV station.

"I will try to escalate this one to our manager and I will let them talk to you, OK?" he said.

No one got back to us. We also called the number that Meyer said she used when trying to communicate with the company that took her order.

We got another call centre and a customer service representative, who called herself Mary, gave us another number to call.

"You have a chance to talk with one of our supervisors and manager," Mary said, but when the number was called, Mary answered the phone again.

"You told me I could call this number and talk to a supervisor," CTV News Vancouver's Ross McLaughlin said.

"Hmm," said Mary.

"Can I?"

The call disconnected.

All the CBD products that Meyer received had a natural product number on them. We looked the number up in Health Canada's database and discovered it was linked to a company called Stalco Inc. based in North York, Ont.

We left a message for Steven Page, the company president, but got no response.

The company's voicemail recording seems to distance itself from the actual sales of its products.

The voicemail recording stated, "Please note Stalco is a third party logistics company and does not sell any products. If you have questions regarding a product that was shipped from our facility, please contact the company that sold you the product."

Fortunately, Meyer says she was able to get all the credit card charges reversed after putting them in dispute with her credit card company's fraud department.

"It can be challenging because you need to show that you didn't agree to these charges and so if you're clicking without reading, you may have inadvertently signed up for something," said Lis.

As for pop-up ads on social media?

"I don't trust them. I'll be scared of every ad that pops up now," Meyer said.  

 

Ross McLaughlin

CTV News Vancouver Consumer Reporter

Vancouver

Contact

February 2022 update: Ross McLaughlin is no longer with CTV News. 

Ross McLaughlin has a reputation for getting results. An award-winning investigative consumer reporter with 18 Emmys® and 4 Edward R. Murrow Awards, McLaughlin has built a career on exposing injustice and giving a voice to those who can’t be heard.

McLaughlin’s stories and specials have focused on making a positive impact on viewers, no matter where he’s worked and lived. As the head of Atlanta’s NBC affiliate’s Center for Investigative Action team, McLaughlin helped fulfil a station-wide commitment to provide positive change in the community. His in-depth investigative reporting has reached to the top levels of local and national government: EBT Welfare Fraud resulted in the introduction of a new law in Georgia; Red Light Camera Intersections was used during testimony at a Congressional hearing on Capitol Hill.

McLaughlin’s dynamic on-air presence and unique style of story-telling has earned him recognition in major markets throughout the U.S. and Canada. Prior to his work in Atlanta, McLaughlin was the face of WJLA-TV’s 7 On Your Side franchise in Washington, DC. His investigation into DC Metro Bus fatal crashes exposed reckless driving and resulted in a complete overhaul of driver training, monitoring, and disciplinary actions. His feature reporting has won accolades too. Grazing For Groceries, McLaughlin’s interpretation of a supermarket chain’s unusual move to encourage shoppers to sample products before buying them, earned him an Emmy.

In 2002 and 2003, McLaughlin worked as part of the on-air team at nationally syndicated Celebrity Justice, digging into high-profile celebrity court cases, including Michael Jackson, Robert Blake, and Winona Ryder’s shoplifting trial. His work as an investigative journalist led to national television appearances, including Larry King Live, Good Morning America, The O’Reilly Factor, Court TV, and MSNBC.

Prior to his time in Los Angeles, McLaughlin was the Consumer Investigative Reporter for KIRO-TV in Seattle. He pioneered undercover investigative techniques, including his landmark Odometer Rollback, where he captured a used-car dealer’s scheme on camera, an industry first. McLaughlin received top honors for his work from the National Association of Consumer Advocates. 

A dual U.S. and Canadian citizen, McLaughlin was nationally recognized as the “Trouble Shooter,” Canada’s first consumer investigative television journalist. Prior to moving to the U.S. in 1996, McLaughlin also anchored prime-time weekday newscasts at ITV (now Global) in Edmonton, Alberta. He began his broadcasting career as a radio host and producer in Calgary and Medicine Hat, Alberta.

McLaughlin studied Broadcast Journalism at the Southern Alberta Institute of Technology in Calgary, and attended Royal Roads Military College in British Columbia. 

 

 

 https://redcoral-wine.com/collections/kids-socks/products/bees-bunnies-dogs-kids-socks?fbclid=IwAR1b-f2F7B4hp7MyO7ubBA6y9fVMPu4St2McXp-JWyvQ3L-4HqUvDGkal40

 

Lisa LaFlamme's Latest Business Venture Sparks Tension With CTV & Bell Media Sponsors - She Fires Back Live On Air!

(NBC) - In a shocking 1-on-1 interview, Canada’s most popular news anchor reveals how she “wouldn't be here without CBD.”

By Nigel Chiwaya | NBC Health

(NBC) - Canada's beloved nightly news anchor and burgeoning business woman Lisa LaFlamme made headlines after revealing her new CBD line on Live TV last week. Pharmaceutical companies were outraged saying they will be filing a lawsuit against LaFlamme and CTV for violating their contract and undercutting their prices. She responded with this:

“When I started this whole thing back in 2018, it really was just a part-time passion project and a way for me to give back. After being given so much, I figured there was no better time to make Tranquileafz CBD Gummies available to everyone, as it can help thousands of people experience life pain-free and live much happier lives.”

Her product, Tranquileafz CBD Gummies, has been flying off the shelves within minutes and Lisa LaFlamme says her number one struggle as CEO is being able to keep up with demand. Her CBD wellness line is 90% cheaper and five times more effective than those being offered by Pfizer and other “Big Pharma” companies.

Bayer and Pfizer were furious after seeing a massive dip in their sales, calling for Lisa LaFlamme to be indicted, saying: “We’re happy Mrs. LaFlamme found something to replace prescriptions, but her announcement was a direct breach of contract. CTV should fire her immediately and she should formally apologize.“

Lisa LaFlamme appeared on Live TV the next day, not to apologize, but to offer viewers free samples.

“I’m not going to let these companies intimidate me,” Lisa fired back during her appearance. “Our product, Tranquileafz CBD Gummies, has helped me and my family cope with what ails us! I am so confident in it that I’m offering free samples to everyone. Tranquileafz CBD Gummies is the product of thousands of hours of research and development. I wouldn’t talk about something on air I don’t believe in and give to my family.”

Lisa LaFlamme eventually admitted that big pharma companies are furious with her after noticing a large decline in sales since Tranquileafz CBD Gummies was launched on the market.

“Users of Tranquileafz CBD Gummies are experiencing results that before now were only possible through prescription medication. It’s obviously a much cheaper, and safer alternative and because of that pharmaceutical companies are finding it harder to keep patients using their prescriptions.”

Lisa LaFlamme's words coupled with online reports of amazing results got us curious about Tranquileafz CBD Gummies so we did some research — here’s what we found.

Is Tranquileafz CBD Gummies Right For You?

The short answer is Yes.

Tranquileafz CBD Gummies has been found to have a positive impact on key body functions including - neurological, physical, and psychological.

This includes but not limited to:

  • Reduces Chronic Pain
  • Supports Joint Health
  • Reduces Anxiety
  • Reduces Headaches
  • Reduces Blood Sugar
  • Supports Cognitive Health
  • Antioxidant Support

While making an appearance on ‘NBC’ she gifted the cast and crew with Tranquileafz CBD Gummies products and made sure every guest was given a sample of the life changing supplement. Since then, she has cultivated a huge celebrity clientele who are regularly reordering the products. See for yourself!


 

Lisa LaFlamme's new line has been a huge hit amongst fellow celebs who got to try the initial launch of Tranquileafz CBD Gummies.

Wayne Gretzky I started a new prescription my doctor suggested and had several negative side effects. Lisa gave me a sample of Tranquileafz CBD Gummies and the product is a miracle worker. It only took a few days for me to notice the difference.

Celine Dion The absolute BEST for general aches and pains. This miracle makes a long evening or day much more enjoyable. Every night that I use Tranquileafz CBD Gummies I wake up and feel better then ever before. I can’t believe it.

Michael J. Fox The advances Lisa LaFlamme has made in the CBD industry are remarkable. I wouldn’t believe it if I hadn’t had the chance to try it out for myself. After using Tranquileafz CBD Gummies for two weeks I was already feeling like a new me with nearly no pain symptoms.

William Shatner It’s hard to believe, but my joint pain is almost gone! After a few weeks of using Tranquileafz CBD Gummies I was able to stop taking all 'over the counter' and prescription medications. I feel like my brain is sharper as well. 


Try It For Yourself!

While Tranquileafz CBD Gummies is selling out around the world, Lisa LaFlamme didn’t want our readers to miss out on experiencing the benefits of Tranquileafz CBD Gummies for themselves.

As such, she is offering our lucky readers the chance to try Tranquileafz CBD Gummies for A Big Discount! There’s no need to rush out to the shops or wait in line. You can order your big discount bottles of the supplement right now from the comfort of your own home. And you don’t need to pay any shipping.

If you want to finally be free from pain while fostering a much better quality of life, make sure you use Tranquileafz CBD Gummies every day. This product is designed to give you incredible results.

Because of the high demand of Tranquileafz CBD Gummies, Lisa LaFlamme can only offer a limited amount of big discount bottles so you’ll need to act quickly to take advantage of this amazing offer.

LIMITED SPECIAL DISCOUNT AVAILABLE, ONLY FOR NBC News READERS
Tuesday, July 26, 2022: Only 6 Big Discount Bottles Remain!

SPECIAL DISCOUNT ONLY For NBC News Viewers: Tranquileafz CBD Gummies

Big Discount + Free Shipping Promotion Ends:

Tuesday, July 26, 2022

Start A Conversation

Dan H.

I really didn't expect such a cool post from you. Actually I have been using Tranquileafz CBD Gummies for about a year already and couldn't be any happier!

Reply . 13 . Like . 12 minutes ago

Zac P.

The timing of this couldn't be better, my wife and I are struggling and this could be our answer.

Reply . 14 . Like . 16 minutes ago

Fritz C.

Yesterday I got my package Tranquileafz CBD Gummies and I already managed to try it! I feel better than ever already!

Reply . 2 . Like . 1 hour ago

Ryan P.

Ryan. I've heard that as well. I am anxious to find out for myself. Thanks FOX!

Reply . 13 . Like . 12 minutes ago

Reynan P.

I have been using Tranquileafz CBD Gummies for two weeks and I can definitely say that could never expect such a strong effect. This is simply AMAZING!!


MCC - DAY 57 - DARREN CAMPBELL (PART 2)

$
0
0

http://www.cacole.ca/confere-reunion/2021/MichaelOMalley.shtml

 

Superintendent Michael O’Malley

Michael O’Malley has been the Director of the RCMP National Public Complaints Directorate since November 2018. His postings include locations in the Maritimes, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, back to the Maritimes and now in the National Capital Region. He was appointed to Commissioned Officer in 2005. Michael has been a detachment and district commander. He was responsible for provincial, regional and national programs. The majority of his RCMP service has been in operational Divisions.  He has significant experience in Aboriginal Policing, Restorative Justice, working with Elders and local Justices of the Peace to address social problems from my eleven years living in indigenous communities. Michael served multiple terms on the Board of Directors for the New Brunswick Canadian Mental Health Association.

 

 cacole.executivedirector@gmail.com

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POvbJq6WTPM&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells 

 


 

MCC - DAY 57 - DARREN CAMPBELL (PART 2)

122 watching now
Started streaming 5 hours ago
3.44K subscribers 


Welcome to live chat! Remember to guard your privacy and abide by our community guidelines.
 
What TheHeckNSTHE DRUNK SGT O’BRIEN
J Jshe can dish it out but can't take it or explain her position
Little Grey CellsGreat JJ. Please do. Lets see conflicts
Julia RockHe has nothing.
Little Grey CellsLEAF?
Green BastardMy only question for Campbell would be " how have you climbed to your rank, when you apparently know nothing"
Julia RockSo short staffed is a public safety risk. Did you report this in any way?
Green Bastardhere come the story line the media will follow.
J J@Julia Rock not listed anywhere?
Ash LunnHoly it's HOT out! Is it 5 O'Brien yet?
CaperEveryone start using all those answers at work. Screwup on purpose and just plead ignorance
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFas a neighbor of the GTA for 43 yrs I honestly didn't know Sandy Hook was a school in the city of Toronto. geez I learn something new everyday 🤣🤣🤣
Chris LeeIt's 5Obrien somewhere
Julia Rock@JJ what?
Little Grey CellsWhat about Bernard? Did you ACTUALLY activate Critical Incident Package because Bernard (Crisis Negotiator) NEVER got a call...
Jayme ReneeYou have months to plan for a Parental Leave
Green Bastardunderstaffed, we need more money and toys. shiny things
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFNasha the boutique income tax lawyer should know all the tricks for hiding $$$ from FINTRAC CSIS RCMP eyes 🤣🤣🤣
Julia RockCourt cases are booked months in advance. So you have visibility!
J J@Julia Rock ..sorry I miss understood. I thought you responded to me comment about Campbell's career listedd online
Julia RockIt’s like vacation.
Green BastardDid you guys have lunch together? Smiling at each other like you shared a burger
InvasiononeIs Bernard still active duty? I wouldn’t know much about him if it weren’t for this stream. MCC seems hesitant to acknowledge that he exists
Julia Rock@JJ. It was seamus. Lol.
J JI need to put my Nascar fingers on pause lmao or start using spell check..fml blahaha
Nosy Scotianhe retired inviso
Chris LeeThe brass get rewarded for keeping the budget down then promoted so they don't ask for anymore it will make them look bad
Tony KCould always use more staffing given the level of incompetence shown by some....more probability to get good one vs bad one.
Chris LeeIt's all about themselves
Ash Lunnrcmp has a lot of waste and overage, he's right about that lmao
Julia RockNobody wants to be an RCMP
Julia RockYou don’t ask? Public safety is at risk?
Green Bastardthis seems rehearsed
J Jdoes anyone know what tracking application the rcmp uses for there fleet? what company manages the software
NS BluenoseChris Lee but it cost overtime to have people work extra shifts
InvasiononeIf Bernard is retired, they should have had him testify at the commission long ago, instead of burying his story in an interview no one will read
Green BastardI keep seein ads to sign up for RCMP
Green Bastardmore taxpayers money
Little Grey CellsBernard is either retired or soon to retire. He said "Darren Bernard, Sergeant with the RCMP, formerly incharge of Milbrook, but soon to retire, so yeah" October 13, 2021
Chris LeeYup that's very true ot costs more
Tony KMinimum and Maximum levels like any organization....
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFwhat about government mandated goof coof policies affecting a detachments staffing
Ash Lunnrcmp is hiring now and you don't even have to go to Depot training in Regina now. lol
J Jlooks like the RCMP and Tourism NS did a collaboration together it made me barf..its on my tweets if u haven't seen it
Jayme Renee Because the public doesn’t trust you? Could that be why? It is not an honourable profession anymore
Julia RockTwo more told to stay in the woods?
NS BluenoseWell who would
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFDANCO Addie would know about staffing shortages and needs under his watch
Little Grey CellsWho authorized Dorrington and co WHO BROKE CHAIN OF COMMAND?
Green Bastardno coverage. Its simple. We cant do this bc NS is too rural or too big. so we need more officers. Ok so if you cant do it, get out and we will go provincial and find a way to make it work
Ash Lunnrcmp accepting just about anyone to join now, even if you identify as a kittie cat lol
Green Bastardleather
Little Grey CellsNAME!!!
Julia RockSend them all to Nunavut. Lots of land to spread out and train.
Little Grey CellsWHO???????
NS BluenoseWho is that person name as no list
Green Bastardcalled it
Virtual Asylumscheer*
NS BluenoseWho holds that position
Green Bastard👉
Little Grey CellsNobody takes ANY RESPONSABLITY in this completely evil organization. If they do, they leave in disgust!!!!
Julia RockHe says, she says!
Little Grey CellsWHAT IS THE PERSON IN CHARGE'S NAME???????
NS BluenoseEnough with the positions name who is in the positions
Julia RockHe had a problem admitting ert was under him!
Little Grey CellsCOWARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
NS BluenoseWhen ert sent out why was negotiator not called out on the 18th and 19th
David AmosYOU ARE A COWARD TOO
Tony KYou must submit to higher why and how many more staff you need....every organization does it.
Truth InAllTAV useless sardine can.
Julia RockMultitasking or general tasking not something that comes automatic foe
FRANKLY NSoh look ducks that glow is now in chat. Welcome!
Jayme ReneeWho was driving the TAV??????
Tony KThere was a trg ERT member driving the ERT vehicle I believe that night.
Tony KTAV
Little Grey CellsOsmosis ...ummmm no
Green BastardNot many on the road these days
Green BastardEspecially out of Enfield
Green BastardMost days 10-20 RCMP cars in lot of detachment
Julia Rock[message retracted]
Little Grey Cellsany 28B11s Green Bastard or does that just go to CSIS in Burnside?
Julia RockSo scripted they could have changed places.
Green BastardWhere was Campbell during the night of 18th? When was he made aware it was more than a weapons complaint?
Green BastardJust to burnside
Little Grey Cellslolz Green
Little Grey CellsFederal.... read in
NS BluenoseRead in those who were not called in by mr Campbell crew were not read in
NS BluenoseAll the money in the world would not have stopped this as it just would have helped them cover up more
Tony KYou cannot simply pick from any section that is not busy and place into ERT....they have already said it must be a full time posn for all their posns.
Julia RockIn a nutshell, the RCMP needs to go.
Julia RockUseless bunch of tools.
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF1 white shirt per GD member will fix everything and issue all members a Fitbit linked to a public access cloud server
Jayme ReneeWe do not have enough coverage in East Hants in my opinion. Call non emergency line and get bible hill. It’s real encouraging.
Green Bastardmy time is almost up?
Little Grey CellsLower mainland not for long despite MSM campaign. BC KICKING RCMP OUT.
Julia RockHow’s the climate in BC towards the RCMP?
Nosy Scotianagree @Jayme. territory is huge
NS BluenoseSo they are on time limit and question limits glad to see it is open and transparent
Jayme ReneeAnd people on the other side of the Bridge are in worse shape because they are covered out of HRM.
David Amoshttps://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/criminal-charge-withdrawn-against-spouse-of-nova-scotia-mass-killer-1.6002613
Little Grey CellsBERNARD WAS NOT CALLED. DID CAMPBELL ACTUALLY ACTIVATE CIP OR DID HE LIE?
Green Bastardis this a joke to you?
Little Grey CellsNova scotia will kick you out as well
Green BastardSTOP SMILING
Green BastardGET OUT
Julia RockI hope it’s realistic that the RCMP are phased out.
Linda MDo don't need ERT for props.
Julia RockQuit drinking, do your jobs and stop being so corrupt.
David Amoshttps://atlantic.ctvnews.ca/nova-scotia-mass-shooting-public-inquiry-issues-rcmp-new-subpoena-for-information-1.5978425
Peter Bykercapacity for chaos
Little Grey CellsBut you do Linda. What would they have for STAGED Bigstops?
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFNasha your a income tax lawyer you should know all police Services are taxpayer funded so why would another PD pay RCMP to use taxpayer equipment and resources
Green BastardNo one needs integrated. Get out
Julia RockIntegrated Bs!
Green Bastardand lunch
Little Grey Cellskk that was a nothing burger other than Federal
Julia RockJosh gets 1.5 hrs.
Green Bastardmask up
Green Bastardlol
Green BastardCampbell doesnt care...save breath
Little Grey CellsWhy is Tom not working with Mr Bryson? Hmmmmmmmmmmm
Julia RockI hope Josh goes aboard him like he did maxwell.
Green Bastardits been a long 2.5 years..
Green Bastardwhere is that?
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFcost sharing and funding you mean the very $$$ Nasha helps her clients avoid paying 🤣🤣🤣
Green Bastardwhere are messages between those two mcc?
Green Bastard​saddle up
Green Bastardlol
Green Bastardyou didnt answer
Robert KlinckIronically talking about funding concerns during the most profligate "inquiry" ever, which has an unlimited budget. By contrast, the 9/11 commission had a $3,000,000 budget to be spent over 18 months.
Little Grey CellsAnswer?
Green BastardWHAT DO YOU EVEN DO?
Chiang LoveYou give the the impression that you’d like the RCs out of NS @Green Bastard 😉
Ash Lunndoes this guy know anything?? or is he just dense?
Green BastardLet me be clear, I cant comment on that @Chiang Love lol
InvasiononeSelective memory and selective expertise. “I oversee the activation and operation of a critical incident package, but I have no idea what they actually do and can’t speak to that”
Little Grey CellsLiability admitted. They broke their contract and can't fulfill public safety requirements
NS BluenoseWho sets those number name not position
Little Grey CellsOOOOOOPS, Darren
Truth InAllDowe
Green BastardOPPPPPPPPPS
Green Bastardis like ops
Little Grey CellsHow about Dion Sutton at the END OF THE ROAD?
NS BluenoseDog teams did as well kept top of road
Truth InAllYes Sutton!
Julia RockImagine Jane traversing with hardly any clothes and no gear.
Jayme ReneeWaiting for the Covid defence
Green Bastardlol
NS BluenosePhone have gps couldn’t lie their
Little Grey CellsCellebrite ALL phones!!!!!!! GPS for ALL members!!!!! BOOOOOOOOM!
Green Bastarddont fall asleep darren..
Green BastardBoom
Green Bastardstumbling
YESSIno difference !?
Ash Lunnwhat!!
Green Bastardjenga blocks falling
Green Bastardta uhhh bicuits
Ash Lunnhe is freaking nuts
NS BluenoseOh someone isn’t as compost know he f*** up go in for it josh
Julia RockWhy was 3 officers sent in?
Green BastardIm in NB now....I cant speak to that
Green Bastardwhen?
NS BluenoseDon’t give him a chance to compose himself
Little Grey CellsBERNARD???????
Green BastardJosh is quick
Julia RockDispatch a CI package but doesn’t check numbers. Wow.
Truth InAllBack to bed
Truth InAllZzz
Truth InAllHe went back to bed
Green Bastardso experianced?
Julia RockSo using his numbers excuse, half the ERT members could have been on vacation.
Truth InAllBernard was kept out!
Little Grey CellsCome on Josh. Ask about Bernard
Green Bastardoh wow
Green BastardJust had message delete
J Jhe got a call quick 22:04
Little Grey CellsOn YT Green Bastard?
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFSAMSUNG CELL PHONES AND TMR2 AND MWS come on Bryson you are lowballing Campbell you know damn well this all exists SERVE YOUR CLIENTS NOT THE MCC
Green Bastardyep
Little Grey Cellshmmmmm odd
Little Grey CellsSend it my way and I will write it if YT wont allow it
Julia RockPsychic?
J JWho called about the cottage being on fire 🔥 it was still light out according to LB
Green Bastardlet me try again
NS BluenoseJosh go in for it you will be the hero and will improve your business
Little Grey CellsOUCH on Green Bastards message being deleted. GTFO out CSE
Green Bastardmessage deleted was "bernard is key, bc no one is talking about him, besides us"
Julia RockWhy wasn’t fire allowed in?
Green BastardCome at me CSE, try me
J Jthose nerves oh my
cyndihas lb lawyer been up yet?
Green BastardIm not in the modd for CSE bs today
Tony KDoes not a scene have to be safe for fire or EHS to be permitted into it?
Chiang LoveOkay, so why wasn’t the fire dept stopped?
Little Grey CellsGreen Bastard's deleted message by CSE " Bernard is key, bc no one is talking about him, besides us"
Chiang LoveWhy was^^
Green Bastard​no his question


Ash LunnWTF where you involved in other than a coverup?

Green Bastardcrime scenes were compromised
Green Bastardif you recall leather saying we have up to 17 crime scenes....
Truth InAllEvery one.
Julia RockCovering evidence first
Ken Trioleverybody's lawyer always tells them that they should not volunteer so I wonder why he volunteered MORE in that last answer
Little Grey CellsNo Tony Critical Incident Package is only activated by Campbell
Little Grey Cells"16) I am responsible for approving requests in Nova Scotia to initiate the Critical IncidentProgram. At 10:46 pm on April 18, 2020, I was contacted by the on-call Critical IncidentCommander who pro
Little Grey Cellsvided me with some details pertaining to the incident in Portapique. Iapproved the full Critical Incident Program to respond in Portapique"
Ken Trioloh my goodness the joy Bond question is making this man turn red
Green Bastardisnt that around the time wortman drove through a field?
Green Bastardcould be, but was it?
Little Grey CellsCampbell affidavit
Green Bastardvague?
Little Grey CellsWhat about Bent text to Aaron????
Julia RockHence the reason pineo was talking about location of houses from road.
cyndishow us the photos
Tony Kinconsistencies...mistakes
Green BastardThis guy seems like he hasnt done a thing with this case
Green Bastardother than try to cover sht up
Green BastardWHAT DO YOU DO?
Ash Lunnwas wartman wearing boots or sneakers with his black jeans?
Linda MWere the Bond bodies moved prior to investigation?
Little Grey Cellsother residentS (plural) is he speaking of Bonds or Tucks?
Green BastardYOU WERE SUPERINTENDENT?
nikki lewisi got impression he was referring to the tucks there
Little Grey CellsWhat residence was he speaking of?
Ken Triolwhen he is repeating the question he is buying himself time to formulate the answer
nikki lewishe talked about no properties burnt on CC
Green BastardNOTHING BUT HELIUM
Tony KBryson and family mbr stated the original crime scene diagram did not match where their family mbrs were found.
nikki lewisi think he merged his repsonse to kind of cover off bonds and tucks
Ken TriolI also think he is implying veracity when he says"When I testified about this earlier"
Green BastardFUREY
Tony KI thought the Bond residence
Green BastardFUREY wasnt? lol
Green Bastardof course he doesnt
Little Grey CellsOOOOOOOOO
NS BluenoseI would say Nova Scotia has never been as bad since all the rcmp came from BC years ago we had good RCMP officer living in our communities
Little Grey CellsI couldnt send message
Green Bastardit doesnt matter where he has
Julia RockYou can’t speak to April 2020 FFS!
Little Grey CellsCrime scene not accurate at Tucks either
Green BastardInteresting @Little Grey Cells
Little Grey Cellshmmmmmmm
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFAaron's interaction with the perpS
Green BastardBS Campbell. ROT
Julia RockNo toot toot here Campbell.
Anita ButtsSexual assaults except their own perpetrators
nikki lewislie deny lie deny
NS44didnt they audit about his ex wife?
Little Grey CellsWhat about 45?
Brenda GrantDarren Iam not aware Campbell lol
Little Grey CellsRed car?
Green BastardCampbell is losin control
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFkeywords being meeting SOME FORM of policing standards not fully compliant to taxpayer demands
Linda MacDonaldI don’t trust a word from Darren’mouth! Lies lies lies
Julia RockPrepared script
Green Bastardby Lucki, pass the buck
Linda MacDonaldOwn your actions Darren
nikki lewishes getting pissy as about to be called out for his lack of geography
Little Grey CellsRIFE with errors on 24
Peter Lambapr 24 conference. why did the rcmp say Goulets car was a RED Mazda. it was said in eng and French.
nikki lewisonly now !!???????
nikki lewisBS!
Julia RockHelen hunt will be standing soon
Green Bastardoh so you now have stuied the geography of the province vs 2020
Little Grey CellsThis is why I reposted the press conferences. MAJOR errors
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFNS RCMP are spiralling towards a code 404 status
Green Bastardyour time is off eh Campbell?
Peter LambCampbell was at Enfield scene. why did he refer to Gina's car as a RED Mazda? who wrote the script?
Tony KERT got lost a few times with their vehicles going to Glenholm...more map issues.
Little Grey CellsWTF???????
Green Bastardthey are always 404. province is too big for them
MHtwo years later
nikki lewisexactly Peter and who stands up and reads something in his position and not triple check it , hmmm
Little Grey CellsWHAT KIND OF INVESTIGATION DID AYOU DO?????????
Ken TriolI'm a little out of the loop I'm not sure who Helen Hunt might be?
Julia RockCamel Campbell.
Tony K[message retracted]
Julia RockMcPhee. Ag
Little Grey CellsLook at the thumbnail of this video Tony. He said RED
Peter LambThe R.C.M.P do not make that mistake. reference to Red Mazda
Ken Triolthx
Green Bastardnot me
Green Bastardprovince is too big Josh...they need more toys
Tony K@Peter Lamb yes, he saw the car at Big Stop...yes clearly not read....I am sure he will admit mistake if questions is asked.
NS BluenoseNegotiation why wasn’t he sent out
Julia RockThis should be labelled Camp Bellhead!
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFCampbell is incharge of equipment and resource allocation hence he'd be sitting in the CIC ensuring DANCO and COC have everything they need. Campbell was fully in the loop real-time
Green BastardMassive province...you should probably go
Tony KLGC - yes love to here his explanation as well....but suspect he will state it was just another mistake he read...hope they ask it.
Little Grey Cells"10 err 11:23" yesterdays thumbnail
Green Bastard100 todd
Little Grey CellsExit 9
Little Grey CellsWhat investigation DID THEY ACTUALLY DO????????
Green Bastardbut where were you
Tony KClearly they wanted to make it seem they were doing everything when they were not.
Little Grey CellsBulldozers busy, destroying crime scenes, parades
NS citizenmeatcove lol
Julia RockTruro. Yes!
Green Bastardsmoke still smoldering and you were starting coverup
Green Bastarddont forget coverUP
Truth InAllTAV was useless for the victims
nikki lewiscourse he will find no fault, thats his crew
Donna Jjesslmao @NS citizen
Green BastardThats why mills bounced
Tony KWe all can be critical....it took to long...some could not even find it.
Brenda Grantwhat evidence was destroyed Campbell?!!
NS citizenhow long would it take them to get to Dingwall?
Green BastardI wouldnt do well in person
Chris LeeOh here we go
Green BastardIntimately
Little Grey CellsShubie crime scene NOT secure and Bernard having to stop firemen from accidently destroying evidence
Green Bastardnot inimately
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@Little Grey Cells Campbell assigned Carroll to site security which means Carroll would have a radio/cell call from Campbell allocating a bulldozer to start the evidence collection
Green BastardBernardis/was one of the good ones
Goodnews BearThe RCMP where in on the hit. Everything else is smoking mirrors.
Goodnews BearLIARS
Little Grey CellsDion Sutton another
Green BastardTim just coughed on all of his afvanced articles
Peter BykerCampbell's Goop🥣"Mmm, Mmm, Bad!"
Judy Brownhe said a massive province, little over 17 Nova Scotia's would fit in Ontario.
Little Grey CellsKevin and Cortez Island. YT banned my video when I discussed HOIT and SgtKevin
Green Bastardlol Peter
Becca AGood question
Ash LunnCampbell's Soup has an expiry date......just saying.....
Little Grey CellsMichichi is OIC MCU?
Little Grey CellsNot actioned
Green Bastardlockyear
Little Grey CellsLisa's lawyer... why??????
Green Bastardand hairclub for men
Tony KSave LB questions...what can they be
UncleBlazerLockyer with the special guest appearance
Ken TriolLOL we can now see Lisa banfield's Achilles heel she is pissed that they have used her so agregiously and even charged her only to drop the charges
Becca AThey don’t charge ppl they’re protecting
Peter Bykera malicious prosecution gambit, perhaps???
Little Grey CellsGelen Bonvie
Little Grey CellsHmmmmmm
Anita ButtsIf this was the states Lisa would be in jail
Little Grey CellsGlen
Tony KSgt/Cpls lay charges with no higher authority...cannot happen.
Green Bastardcampbell you would agree that my client came out of a tree ?
Julia RockOh he can remember that?
Chris LeeLol
CaperWhat privilege does her lawyer have in questioning. Wasn’t she found guilty of charges regardless the punishment
Little Grey CellsWhy November? June interview.
Tony KCharges go higher for approval within RCMP before going to crown prosecutors on such an important issue.
Ken TriolLOL when he says I might have it means there's some paperwork floating around there somewhere I hope someone finds it
Green Bastardohhhh
Julia RockAlways pointing.
Little Grey CellsThe perceptions....
Green BastardPointing fingers
Little Grey CellsOptics
Becca AThese questions are in regards to being set up
CaperHe deserves no better answer than the families lawyers
Green Bastardleather doesnt stand a chance
Ken Trioloh my goodness look how red this Witness IS now
Julia RockGreat memory now.
Becca AI wonder if that’s around the same time they mention slippers in debert the first time
Becca AWhat was marks last name ?
Little Grey Cellssolicitor client bullshit
Green BastardYou remember the people within the rcmp
Green Bastardbs
nikki lewisbarbie back
Green Bastardchareges are dropped
nikki lewismoot point now !!!!
Green Bastardbut forget the families
Becca AExactly
CaperTo bad the mcc didn’t pony up for this lawyer for the families. What’s he charge again an hour completely covered by the mcc
Green Bastardmacdonald is hugry
InvasiononeLisa’s charges get dismissed, and now he wants to hijack the commission
nikki lewismacdonald being arsy
Green Bastardlooks like he has been on crystal crescent beach for three hours
Becca AMacdonald ugh
Peter Lambnothing but drama surrounds Lisa Banfield imo
Becca ASame dirty circle
Green Bastardbreak
Green Bastard lol
Green Bastardno mask
Little Grey Cellsoh oh meltdown
Julia RockChecking out the hunger level with the girls.
Tony KMacDonald needs help from Stanton....
Green Bastard3 hr break...well be back tmr
Truth InAllMacDonald getting advice. Looser
Becca ADoes she even have the authority to speak
nikki lewis100% Peter, off completely scott free and this BS dicussion about her, what about the families !
Lynn MSmoking it lol
Little Grey CellsNOT answered
Green Bastardlol
Green Bastardno answer
Ken Trioloh my goodness there must be some big sunshine in that room because Mr McDonald whole head looks red
Green Bastarddo you like sleepytime or lemon ginger
Julia RockNow the other day when LB was there no questions regarding charges could be asked. Here we are. Wtf?
Virtual Asylum"appropriate to lay charges"? She should be UNDER the prison
nikki lewisbecause she is now off scott free @Julia Rock
Truth InAllRights!
Julia RockNikki. No ammo charges either?
Lynn MFluid and dynamic
InvasiononeI hope family lawyers who think “I can’t ask that question” are paying attention to this. Do you think Bob is worried about what he can and can’t answer? REPRESENT YOUR CLIENTS
Becca AYes
Ken TriolI find it interesting that he is referring to his client as Lisa even though it's not a court of law you would expect him to say Miss Banfield
Green BastardBanfield is way more intelligent than she lets on
cyndiCampbell soup makes you poop, down your leg and in your boot!
David AmosNeed I say I been waiting or Lockyer to step up to the plate and start swinging???
Truth InAllI ask one well said!
CaperThat’s classic rcmp
nikki lewisall moot point re if read charges anyway, she has clean record
Green Bastardits been years snce you have been in BC tho campbell
Little Grey CellsHe will go after RCMP for a civil suit
Green Bastardkind of like no one reminded you that you are under oath
NovaScotiaFreckles Back for lunch
NS44ok im leaving
NovaScotiaFreckles Why is Lisa’s lawyer interviewing him?
Tony KPerhaps that is why restorative justice was given if rights were not properly given so if they fought it they would win....had to settle for the far lesser evils.
Green Bastardpointing fingers
nikki lewisyep @LGC, i agree, back up plan when other suits may fail
Donna Jjess[message retracted]
Little Grey CellsOptics BINGO
Becca AThey probably didn’t have enough for a conviction
Julia RockRemembers so well now. Selective memory.
NovaScotiaFreckles Funny how her restorative justice is done so the lawyer is here asking questions
Ken TriolI would imagine the bill for Mr Lockyear is getting pretty big
CaperIf their rights were infringed upon that was an argument for the proceedings
Donna JjessWhy is her Lawyer even be allowed here today ? Why is he?
J DoneMr Bigs are good for some, not for Lisa
Becca AExactly
Green Bastardwhere are all of your notes? if public interest, why did it take you two years to provide notes, and be interviewed by mcc
Becca ABingo
Julia RockAlso, pineo wanted lockyear here this morning before he proceeded. Hmmm
Anita ButtsThey are afraid of her because she knows everything
Becca A💯
nikki lewisbecause officially he represents a "participant"🤢
Green Bastardha not funny
Becca AIt’s a classic rcmp move
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@Little Grey Cells LLZ is laying out a giant class action suit she's gone after the families so why not every taxpayer
NovaScotiaFreckles She’s a participant?!
Green Bastardgood point Julia
Becca ATo protect their own
Tony KLockyear saying they were mistreated so they can later still sue for unfair persecution if they choice to do so.
Green BastardFamilies werent a concern for you at all, your family, maybe, but not victims families,
Little Grey CellsArtwork set up Todd?
David AmosNeed I say I was overjoyed that Campbell THE EVIL Superintendent Michael O’Malley and their KPMG buddies???
AlleyCat2580Command triangle=Bermuda triangle
Green Bastardwhat\?
Green Bastardlol
InvasiononeGabe’s estate isn’t enough
Truth InAllLol!
NS Bluenose​Oh we are trying to give Lisa pity party


Tony KPerhaps that is why restorative justice was given if rights were not properly given so if they fought it they would win....had to settle for the far lesser evils.
Green Bastardpointing fingers
nikki lewisyep @LGC, i agree, back up plan when other suits may fail
Donna Jjess[message retracted]
Little Grey CellsOptics BINGO
Becca AThey probably didn’t have enough for a conviction
Julia RockRemembers so well now. Selective memory.
NovaScotiaFreckles Funny how her restorative justice is done so the lawyer is here asking questions
Ken TriolI would imagine the bill for Mr Lockyear is getting pretty big
CaperIf their rights were infringed upon that was an argument for the proceedings
Donna JjessWhy is her Lawyer even be allowed here today ? Why is he?
J DoneMr Bigs are good for some, not for Lisa
Becca AExactly
Green Bastardwhere are all of your notes? if public interest, why did it take you two years to provide notes, and be interviewed by mcc
Becca ABingo
Julia RockAlso, pineo wanted lockyear here this morning before he proceeded. Hmmm
Anita ButtsThey are afraid of her because she knows everything
Becca A💯
nikki lewisbecause officially he represents a "participant"🤢
Green Bastardha not funny
Becca AIt’s a classic rcmp move
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@Little Grey Cells LLZ is laying out a giant class action suit she's gone after the families so why not every taxpayer
NovaScotiaFreckles She’s a participant?!
Green Bastardgood point Julia
Becca ATo protect their own
Tony KLockyear saying they were mistreated so they can later still sue for unfair persecution if they choice to do so.
Green BastardFamilies werent a concern for you at all, your family, maybe, but not victims families,
Little Grey CellsArtwork set up Todd?
David AmosNeed I say I was overjoyed that Campbell THE EVIL Superintendent Michael O’Malley and their KPMG buddies???
AlleyCat2580Command triangle=Bermuda triangle
Green Bastardwhat\?
Green Bastardlol
InvasiononeGabe’s estate isn’t enough
Truth InAllLol!
NS BluenoseOh we are trying to give Lisa pity party
Green BastardLeather again
Truth InAllOhhh told on Leather.
NovaScotiaFreckles I can’t with this woman anymore
Julia RockHe is rounding third, almost there campbell!
Green Bastardsettle down Macdonald
InvasiononeHahaha “asked and answered” where has that objection been for the past few months??
Green BastardWow Macdonald is pissed
nikki lewisMacdonald is PISSED!
Truth InAllMacDonald is shook
nikki lewisquestion is WHY?
Green Bastardyep
Green BastardJenga
Becca AHave been saying it since the beginning, they laid charges on his father in laws and Peter.. everyone closest to gabe for a reason… to protect themselves.
Green BastardI know
M UI missed the afternoon, looks like it’s been intense!
Green BastardIts a civil on its wayy
Anita Butts🤥
Peter Bykerit sounded like Advisory Crown councils named Mark Harim(sp.?) Shauna Macdonald (sp.?) were mentioned. @Little Grey Cells could I share a link?
Julia RockYes so obvious what lockyear is doing.
NS BluenoseNow that she has her case finished
Green BastardPineo still in building?
Becca AThey erased his social media to protect themselves , not the banfields
M UPineo working with Lockyear?
nikki lewismass sham def know more, zero reason for Macdonald to get pissy then
Tony KEstate not enough for LB needs...she wants more.
Ken TriolMr Locklear is very good and probably worth every penny so it will be interesting to see the strategy of the RCMP and the MCC going forward
J DoneWasn't the EMT who took Lisa to the Hospital a Pineo?
Julia RockKen, I agree!
J DoneI might be wrong on that
Julia RockYes
Green BastardMCC worried about Lockyear.
Julia RockRifht
Julia RockRight
Green BastardMacdonald didnt say boo all day until lockeyea
nikki lewisthe $100k Legal fees banfield got from MCC were likely blown within a short while, $1200 a hour lockyear
Ken TriolI believe it was indeed a Pineo who made contact with Lisa
nikki lewiscan lockyear sue MCC toob ????
Green BastardYes J done
Linda MOf course because its all art work.
nikki lewistoo? I guess why not ?
J Donerelation?
nikki lewislaw suite against RCMP, DOJ,, MCC, Province
Green BastardGreg Pineo
J DoneThat's interesting if there's some collusion with the lawyers
Tony KSubpoena back LB if Lockyear wants to play hard ball and permit full cross examinations.
Peter Lambyes tonyk
Truth InAllInteresting Campbell said Leather was for it too.
nikki lewisshe opportunity to tell all though, and nothing to date
Mizz FoxxBecca wtf are you serious right now. team Lisa much lol
ck@ Tony K. love that idea. leave her two guards behind though.
Julia RockLockyears questions hardly look scripted. Why is he allowed these privileges?
Truth InAllOh yes long
NS BluenoseThey will settle so she doesn’t spill the beans.
Truth InAllMacDonald needs a cool down group hug session
nikki lewiswas lockyear last one or did they say DOJ asking questions?
Peter Bykeri'm spooked out too
NovaScotiaFreckles That annoyed me that her lawyer was there
Truth InAllThe lawyer is top notch, unlike the lawyers here.
Becca AIt’s finally getting somewhere at least
Green Bastardwe are paying for her bill lol
Ken Triol@lgc here in the middle of the prairies my wife and I think that Lisa is being used unwillingly... and we also believe that this lawyer will exact her revenge for that
Truth InAllAnd her lawyer knows what he is shooting for
nikki lewisi thought each participant got $100k for the MCC process?
Truth InAllYes the MCC pays for her lawyer
Julia RockNikki they said this morning ward and young after lockyear.
Becca AMe too ken
ckwho is paying her legal bills. and all 3 of them are now free
NovaScotiaFreckles Wait what!!! The tax payers paid for her legal bills?!
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFpainting a picture of Lisa railroaded by incompetent RCMP and then Command triangle attempted to silence her with wrongful charges
nikki lewisthansk @Julia Rock 🙂
Tony KMust be cap on lawyer fees for all....cannot be unlimited....Lockyear will get cut of any settlement.
Ken Triolagree @truth
Becca AAfter having experience myself with an ex rcmp attempting to set me up , it’s a classic move
M UMaybe LB wanted to be crossed examined but wasn’t allowed 🤷‍♀
Green Bastardthere was a lot of money found at the cottage...
Truth InAllJust the fact her pricey lawyer is there today’s shows much.
Green Bastardsooooo rcmp
What TheHeckNSI assume tax payers are paying for her to be represented in the Inquiry’
M UHer brothers paid their own legal fees
Julia RockSo Lb was abused by police as well? Is that the story now?
Becca ANext they’ll be trying to throw her in the nut house to shut them up lol it’s classic
nikki lewisis lockyear on retainer as all the money is in trust right now?
Ken TriolI think that Lisa is not who she purports to be at all
What TheHeckNSSeamus, you should offer to interview her
Robert Klinck$3 million was the initial 9/11 commission budget. Final bill was $15 million.
Becca AIn statements Maureen says Lisa’s scared of rcmp
Mizz FoxxBecca, not the same. Were you living off the proceeds of crime for nearly 2 decades while saying "I don't want to know" every time something got shady? Lisa benefited in every way, she's not a victim
Becca AAnd doesn’t trust them … there’s a reason for it
Julia RockSo Gabe was going to put names on a cop car for fallen officers and she was afraid of them?
NovaScotiaFreckles If someone abuses your sister or sister in law why are you out there buying him ammo
InvasiononeWas that the first “asked and answered” objection of the entire commission?
M UGood point @LGC
What TheHeckNS@nikki lewis good question, I’m assuming from the 19th-the time she was confirmed a participant, SHE would have paid for it
nikki lewisone of them ?
GlowwatcherLB had a lawyer representing her the next day. The MCC was not formed for over a year, who was paying the intial lawyer fees
What TheHeckNS@Mizz Foxx YES thank you
Ken Triol@glow watcher that is a very good question
Robert KlinckWhat is the source of the money for the MCC, which is patently a propagandistic exercise?
NS BluenoseNikki she is big then one of them, they would through any member
Truth InAllPending pay
Stella VW[message retracted]
Judy Brownhells Angels?
What TheHeckNSSHE would pay that
nikki lewisdid Gabe stock Lockyear up on a cash float way before?
Truth InAllThat lawyer is paid when the dust settles
Ken Trioleither this is all part of the drama prescripted ...but I'm going to put my money on this was a curveball
Julia RockWhy get a lawyer from day one unless you are guilty or know lots that might incriminate you.
nikki lewisI think she has a special relationship/shes one of them in a way, works "for" them
Becca AKevin von. Bergan set her up with him I believe
Ken Triolat Nikki I agree with you I see Lisa's body language is being powerful not victim-like at all.. she pretends well but not good enough
What TheHeckNSTin cans full of money
lilybalm66i think she knows everything
Becca AWho was gabes con partner
lilybalm66yup for sure
Judy Brownremember Louise Russo shooting in Toronto AG made deal with Hells Angels to pay her
What TheHeckNSThey’re scared of what she represents
Judy Brown2011
NS BluenoseIf she is holding lots of brown envelopes she better have dead man’s switch
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFBanfield mafia has juice on RCMP or the Banfield's are a somebody playing off as a nobody
M UMaybe she is the handler?
Mizz FoxxTodd 💯
Oh Dear
afternoon all
lilybalm66i also think the whole Banfield family are involved some how
Julia Rock20
Oh Dear
Did I miss anything interesting?
Julia RockLilybalm66 agree.
Julia RockLockyear showed up
Becca AGabe was team blue but the reds are all over this case.
Peter Lambagreed Becca. engineered imo
Peter BykerLB's lawyer made an unexpected return
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFLisa knows enough to pawn everything off on a dead man while she takes in the dough and disappears
nikki lewisafternoon after court date this morning
Becca AHas anyone ever found anything on the banfields aside from one of then having a Marriott as a fb friend , serous question ?
Julia RockThey announced lockyear this morning when Rachel young gave the agenda.
Green Bastardunless he snuck in
NovaScotiaFreckles Sorry what was pineos comment?
nikki lewisis lockyear in the room or something?
Ken Triolthat's interesting which band field had a Marriott as a Facebook friend
nikki lewishe wasnt as he was at court getting lisa off hook officially
Virtual Asylumwho was the Banfield that had a Marriot as a fb friend?
Green Bastardhave we discussed the banfields?
Julia RockPineo wanted a break and said he wanted to discuss with his team. They almost didn’t go to break, pineo said lockyear was interested in being there. Something like that
Becca AMilitary dr political Steven ellis is blue ?
NovaScotiaFreckles What was pineos comment?
Julia RockPineo pushed for the break as he wanted lockyear in the room.
Donna Jjess[message retracted]
Chiang LoveFar too many people want the truth to stay well hidden!!
Becca AI don’t trust pineo
Donna JjessHere's there @Nikki
What TheHeckNSPineo wanted to ask about the lead up to charges \
MHI thought he said Lisa's charges are being dropped this morning so then he could mention her
NovaScotiaFreckles Why would he want him there
Chiang LoveThat was very odd.
nikki lewisi dont think he was this morning though?
nikki lewishe would have been at dartmouth court with Lisa
Truth InAllHer charge dismissed
nikki lewischarges offically dropped
Donna JjessNot sure @Nikki
NS BluenoseI though he believe he might have wanted to object to questions about the guns was how I took it. It didn’t make sense
David AmosPerhaps Seamus should grow some Balls and call me now?? 902 800 0369
Virtual Asylumespecially a blackmailer like HER
Anita ButtsRestorative Justice
nikki lewisDartmouth Court
Truth InAllShe did the steps and was discharged
Julia RockHe wasn’t there and I don’t know if he joined after break.
Becca APineos questions today were telling
NovaScotiaFreckles Completed the restorative justice thing
Truth InAllToday
M UDo we know what they had to do for restorative justice?
ckpiniot said he wanted to be there. they appeared in court this morning over finalizing restorative justice.
Judy Brownlockyer's more of a victims rights advocate, or wrongfully convicted. don't know what is angle is other than playing Banfield as a victim
Truth InAllPeino said he was on his way.
NS BluenoseChRges withdrawn
Mizz FoxxBecca, the Banfield's supplied Gabe with ammo. They didn't just give him some, they supplied him. You don't supply ammo to an aggressive sketchbag just cuz. they're part of it
ckcharges are withdrawn and closed
Jayme ReneeHe had questions about the banfield charges and made comment that unless he had snuck Lockyer wasn’t there. Wouldn’t he have been in court w/ LB this morning???
Chiang LoveShe finished her restorative justice obligations, I believe
Green BastardBang on Mizz foxx
Mizz FoxxWhether Wortman killed everyone or not, the Banfield's are involved beneficiaries off his lifestyle. Ignorance is an excuse, not a good reason
M UThey signed off on the restorative justice today, they’ve completed what was required.
Jayme ReneeShe completed RJ and charges were dropped or dismissed not sure on terminology
ckbut this morning piniot had stated he was going to question about Lisa b and that is why he says he wanted to be there
Julia RockMizz foxx. Exactly. All in on it!
David Amos I told everyone what was gong on out of the gate
Becca AMizzfox, but we don’t know what gabe told them the ammo was for , we do know he told Kevin he was stocking up on ammo and taking gun courses to protect from humans
Julia RockMizz foxx. They will be forever linked to these massacres.
Becca AMaureen hope/doucette seemed to know he had a hit list
Mizz FoxxThat face Janice makes is the face people make when their house of cards fell down. no more funzies sad face
Green Bastardbut you wanted all of the money
Green Bastardwhy did it take two years for you to speak regardless of rcmp
Becca AMaureen hope said a man in bridgwater did the decaling. Rcmp uncles said he was smuggling guns for years and gave him police gear ..If they are going to charge a few charge all
Glowwatchercourt rules LB had met all restoring justice requirements and all charges dropped
David Amos I talked to Nick Beaton first
Becca A Not calling her a victim , but being used as a deflection to protect others and wipe their hands clean
Julia Rock30 mins.
Becca AEmails suggest Kevin bergin and Kevin were professional con artists , zero charges
Becca AAnd gabe I mean
robert thomasSo missed everything today.. Did I miss much or was it moar of the same...
NS BluenoseEh I remember
Mizz FoxxNah Robert, even Lockyer, Lisa's lawyer was there. Campbell looked shook
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFwithdrawn means not enough evidence to proceed it doesn't mean Lisa and the Banfield boys are innocent
AlbinoLisa knows what cops partied at the rape garage.
Mizz FoxxMacDonald was disturbed as well. They seem freaked out. Like...what if Banfield does decide to be more upfront just anyway? 😯
David AmosI repeat follow the money and KPMG ARE THE GATEKEEPERS
Mizz FoxxNarrative would be toilet bowled. Wouldn't that be nice
Julia RockLockyear isn’t following a script. That’s not allowed! Lol.
MHtwo minutes to then retire for day?
Becca AAlbino , did she ? Half the statements from women in Portapique didn’t seem like they even knew she existed . One said she didn’t pass requirements to join the community bonfires .
robert thomasSo, in essence, Lisa walks, Campbell balks, and for the rest of us as far as MCC is concerned, wait for the final report of nothing to see here!
nikki lewisi think they will have to allow DOJ to go ahead
Mizz FoxxLockyer is doing what all lawyers should have been doing from the get go, asking questions when they say not to, it shakes em up
Julia RockThey protected her until the charges were dropped and now her lawyers are coming for blood.
David AmosI posted that link hours ago in this chat
nikki lewisCampbell is finished after today, mcc wouldnt dare not let DOJ ask their questions haha
Becca ASeems like gabe had her running the clinic while he did everything and everyone feom Portapique to maine lol



Julia RockSo Lb was abused by police as well? Is that the story now?
Becca ANext they’ll be trying to throw her in the nut house to shut them up lol it’s classic
nikki lewisis lockyear on retainer as all the money is in trust right now?
Ken TriolI think that Lisa is not who she purports to be at all
What TheHeckNSSeamus, you should offer to interview her
Robert Klinck$3 million was the initial 9/11 commission budget. Final bill was $15 million.
Becca AIn statements Maureen says Lisa’s scared of rcmp
Mizz FoxxBecca, not the same. Were you living off the proceeds of crime for nearly 2 decades while saying "I don't want to know" every time something got shady? Lisa benefited in every way, she's not a victim
Becca AAnd doesn’t trust them … there’s a reason for it
Julia RockSo Gabe was going to put names on a cop car for fallen officers and she was afraid of them?
NovaScotiaFreckles If someone abuses your sister or sister in law why are you out there buying him ammo
InvasiononeWas that the first “asked and answered” objection of the entire commission?
M UGood point @LGC
What TheHeckNS@nikki lewis good question, I’m assuming from the 19th-the time she was confirmed a participant, SHE would have paid for it
nikki lewisone of them ?
GlowwatcherLB had a lawyer representing her the next day. The MCC was not formed for over a year, who was paying the intial lawyer fees
What TheHeckNS@Mizz Foxx YES thank you
Ken Triol@glow watcher that is a very good question
Robert KlinckWhat is the source of the money for the MCC, which is patently a propagandistic exercise?
NS BluenoseNikki she is big then one of them, they would through any member
Truth InAllPending pay
Stella VW[message retracted]
Judy Brownhells Angels?
What TheHeckNSSHE would pay that
nikki lewisdid Gabe stock Lockyear up on a cash float way before?
Truth InAllThat lawyer is paid when the dust settles
Ken Trioleither this is all part of the drama prescripted ...but I'm going to put my money on this was a curveball
Julia RockWhy get a lawyer from day one unless you are guilty or know lots that might incriminate you.
nikki lewisI think she has a special relationship/shes one of them in a way, works "for" them
Becca AKevin von. Bergan set her up with him I believe
Ken Triolat Nikki I agree with you I see Lisa's body language is being powerful not victim-like at all.. she pretends well but not good enough
What TheHeckNSTin cans full of money
lilybalm66i think she knows everything
Becca AWho was gabes con partner
lilybalm66yup for sure
Judy Brownremember Louise Russo shooting in Toronto AG made deal with Hells Angels to pay her
What TheHeckNSThey’re scared of what she represents
Judy Brown2011
NS BluenoseIf she is holding lots of brown envelopes she better have dead man’s switch
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFBanfield mafia has juice on RCMP or the Banfield's are a somebody playing off as a nobody
M UMaybe she is the handler?
Mizz FoxxTodd 💯
Oh Dear
afternoon all
lilybalm66i also think the whole Banfield family are involved some how
Julia Rock20
Oh Dear
Did I miss anything interesting?
Julia RockLilybalm66 agree.
Julia RockLockyear showed up
Becca AGabe was team blue but the reds are all over this case.
Peter Lambagreed Becca. engineered imo
Peter BykerLB's lawyer made an unexpected return
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFLisa knows enough to pawn everything off on a dead man while she takes in the dough and disappears
nikki lewisafternoon after court date this morning
Becca AHas anyone ever found anything on the banfields aside from one of then having a Marriott as a fb friend , serous question ?
Julia RockThey announced lockyear this morning when Rachel young gave the agenda.
Green Bastardunless he snuck in
NovaScotiaFreckles Sorry what was pineos comment?
nikki lewisis lockyear in the room or something?
Ken Triolthat's interesting which band field had a Marriott as a Facebook friend
nikki lewishe wasnt as he was at court getting lisa off hook officially
Virtual Asylumwho was the Banfield that had a Marriot as a fb friend?
Green Bastardhave we discussed the banfields?
Julia RockPineo wanted a break and said he wanted to discuss with his team. They almost didn’t go to break, pineo said lockyear was interested in being there. Something like that
Becca AMilitary dr political Steven ellis is blue ?
NovaScotiaFreckles What was pineos comment?
Julia RockPineo pushed for the break as he wanted lockyear in the room.
Donna Jjess[message retracted]
Chiang LoveFar too many people want the truth to stay well hidden!!
Becca AI don’t trust pineo
Donna JjessHere's there @Nikki
What TheHeckNSPineo wanted to ask about the lead up to charges \
MHI thought he said Lisa's charges are being dropped this morning so then he could mention her
NovaScotiaFreckles Why would he want him there
Chiang LoveThat was very odd.
nikki lewisi dont think he was this morning though?
nikki lewishe would have been at dartmouth court with Lisa
Truth InAllHer charge dismissed
nikki lewischarges offically dropped
Donna JjessNot sure @Nikki
NS BluenoseI though he believe he might have wanted to object to questions about the guns was how I took it. It didn’t make sense
David AmosPerhaps Seamus should grow some Balls and call me now?? 902 800 0369
Virtual Asylumespecially a blackmailer like HER
Anita ButtsRestorative Justice
nikki lewisDartmouth Court
Truth InAllShe did the steps and was discharged
Julia RockHe wasn’t there and I don’t know if he joined after break.
Becca APineos questions today were telling
NovaScotiaFreckles Completed the restorative justice thing
Truth InAllToday
M UDo we know what they had to do for restorative justice?
ckpiniot said he wanted to be there. they appeared in court this morning over finalizing restorative justice.
Judy Brownlockyer's more of a victims rights advocate, or wrongfully convicted. don't know what is angle is other than playing Banfield as a victim
Truth InAllPeino said he was on his way.
NS BluenoseChRges withdrawn
Mizz FoxxBecca, the Banfield's supplied Gabe with ammo. They didn't just give him some, they supplied him. You don't supply ammo to an aggressive sketchbag just cuz. they're part of it
ckcharges are withdrawn and closed
Jayme ReneeHe had questions about the banfield charges and made comment that unless he had snuck Lockyer wasn’t there. Wouldn’t he have been in court w/ LB this morning???
Chiang LoveShe finished her restorative justice obligations, I believe
Green BastardBang on Mizz foxx
Mizz FoxxWhether Wortman killed everyone or not, the Banfield's are involved beneficiaries off his lifestyle. Ignorance is an excuse, not a good reason
M UThey signed off on the restorative justice today, they’ve completed what was required.
Jayme ReneeShe completed RJ and charges were dropped or dismissed not sure on terminology
ckbut this morning piniot had stated he was going to question about Lisa b and that is why he says he wanted to be there
Julia RockMizz foxx. Exactly. All in on it!
David Amos I told everyone what was gong on out of the gate
Becca AMizzfox, but we don’t know what gabe told them the ammo was for , we do know he told Kevin he was stocking up on ammo and taking gun courses to protect from humans
Julia RockMizz foxx. They will be forever linked to these massacres.
Becca AMaureen hope/doucette seemed to know he had a hit list
Mizz FoxxThat face Janice makes is the face people make when their house of cards fell down. no more funzies sad face
Green Bastardbut you wanted all of the money
Green Bastardwhy did it take two years for you to speak regardless of rcmp
Becca AMaureen hope said a man in bridgwater did the decaling. Rcmp uncles said he was smuggling guns for years and gave him police gear ..If they are going to charge a few charge all
Glowwatchercourt rules LB had met all restoring justice requirements and all charges dropped
David Amos I talked to Nick Beaton first
Becca A Not calling her a victim , but being used as a deflection to protect others and wipe their hands clean
Julia Rock30 mins.
Becca AEmails suggest Kevin bergin and Kevin were professional con artists , zero charges
Becca AAnd gabe I mean
robert thomasSo missed everything today.. Did I miss much or was it moar of the same...
NS BluenoseEh I remember
Mizz FoxxNah Robert, even Lockyer, Lisa's lawyer was there. Campbell looked shook
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFwithdrawn means not enough evidence to proceed it doesn't mean Lisa and the Banfield boys are innocent
AlbinoLisa knows what cops partied at the rape garage.
Mizz FoxxMacDonald was disturbed as well. They seem freaked out. Like...what if Banfield does decide to be more upfront just anyway? 😯
David AmosI repeat follow the money and KPMG ARE THE GATEKEEPERS
Mizz FoxxNarrative would be toilet bowled. Wouldn't that be nice
Julia RockLockyear isn’t following a script. That’s not allowed! Lol.
MHtwo minutes to then retire for day?
Becca AAlbino , did she ? Half the statements from women in Portapique didn’t seem like they even knew she existed . One said she didn’t pass requirements to join the community bonfires .
robert thomasSo, in essence, Lisa walks, Campbell balks, and for the rest of us as far as MCC is concerned, wait for the final report of nothing to see here!
nikki lewisi think they will have to allow DOJ to go ahead
Mizz FoxxLockyer is doing what all lawyers should have been doing from the get go, asking questions when they say not to, it shakes em up
Julia RockThey protected her until the charges were dropped and now her lawyers are coming for blood.
David AmosI posted that link hours ago in this chat
nikki lewisCampbell is finished after today, mcc wouldnt dare not let DOJ ask their questions haha
Becca ASeems like gabe had her running the clinic while he did everything and everyone feom Portapique to maine lol
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFI was so concerned about public safety I had to buy ammo and help smuggle guns across the border and hide all the $$$$
nikki lewisno bullets supplied people wouldnt have died, period, they are culpable,
Julia Rock35
NS BluenoseHer charges been dropped is all your going to here tonight on the new
MHLocklear thrown out
robert thomasAll the money in play provides a massive motive for Banfield to look the other way...
Little Grey CellsPineo is back?
Becca ADavid Amos you’ve been set up before what’s your take on Lisa , being protected or set up to deflect and wipe their own hands clean ?
NS BluenoseNothing about Campbell’s testimony
Mizz Foxx😬
Little Grey CellsNothing about Tara? Task 703?
robert thomashe did not sleep well last night
Becca APineos back wtf
Green Bastardmazk
Peter Bykerdid they remove the mention of the brother, and brother in laws charge in the article?
What TheHeckNSThats how disconnected they are from this
Little Grey CellsAnd now no Lockyer?
Mizz FoxxStanton is allergic to reality
Becca AWow
InvasiononeLockyer was finished
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFLisa merely lost a few $1000 dollars and a cabin 23 families lost everything. The victims families are entitled to the utmost support from Ottawa and the country. Lisa doesn't deserve anything
nikki lewislockyear got shown the door lol
Green Bastardblaming truro?
Becca ALockyer is a goner
Little Grey CellsWTF is going on
Tony KAG must show the minimum safety was being provided.
Julia RockLockyear wanted to stay his hair had another appt!
robert thomaswhat did Lockyer do?
MHjust moving on with no explanation
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@Invasionone LLZ will stick around until the class action suit is settled and the cash divyed up
Green Bastardwow.
MHfisticuffs in the hallway?
robert thomaswhat did I miss!
Mizz FoxxCampbell's getting sick of being there, the smug is wearing off
InvasiononeI meant Lockyer was finished with his questions before break
Little Grey CellsA lot Robert
Green Bastardwalking through grocery store listening
J DoneWere we expecting Lockyer back? He seemed to be finished
David AmosLockyer played everyone but mean old me like fiddle
Little Grey CellsI didnt understand that Lockyer was finished
Becca AHe was finished ? I thought they interrupted him for an emergency break
InvasiononeNo he was done after the objection
J DoneI think he said, "OK, well that's all" and thanked the guy
Peter Byker@Green Bastard That's one way of Liking and Sharing, cheers, play this out LOUD
MHthere was an objection - and then gone. Not finished in my mind
Julia RockWrapping a bow on things!
David AmosShould I call Robert Thomas today?
FRANKLY NSDucks that glow and have a long history with RCMP
Julia RockHe was finished the break was abrupt
Tony K[message retracted]
Green Bastardno earbuds. campbell is loud af right now in produce lol
Mizz FoxxMCC breaks are a reset button. like when a video game lags out and you have to restart the system. Lockyer was lagging the narrative. "NEXT!" MacDonald face glowy red
David AmosGoogle David Raymond Amos and check my work
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAFI'm going to ask RCMP HQ for 2 support ducks I'm naming them KFC and Popeye
Peter BykerHijack the intercom! lol
FRANKLY NSCOINTELPRO
MHif he was finished, they should have said so
robert thomasgo ahead @David Amos make my day. But be careful you were in a round about way threatening me the other day from behind your keyboard
MHLISA won't like it
Becca ACan’t believe Truro police chief is Steven MacNeil that’s why they seem so different and liberal vs the thin blue liners
Little Grey CellsThreats aren't good
David AmosI am blogging the words in this chat right now
Little Grey Cellsrefrain
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@FRANKLY NS 🤫🤫🤫🤫 Cointel and MH Chaos are conspiracies made on a subway 😉
Julia RockJust went back and looked. MacDonald interjected to lockyear and said that’s been asked and answered and lockyear said ok that’s all to campbell. MacDonald immediately said let’s take a break.
Little Grey CellsAnd?
J DoneMH, if you go back about 46 or 47 minutes it seemed pretty clear he was done - would be easy to miss though
MHgotcha
Green Bastardlol the looks I got 🤣
Little Grey CellsThe grocery store is entertained or shocked?
Little Grey CellsCrayons and sharpies?
Julia RockI’m waiting for her to break out and sing Coal Miners Daughter!
nikki lewisthats too funny @Green Bastard
David AmosRobert Thomas is a liar Perhaps he should call the RCMP as I suggested in Public comments when he decided to Troll me Trust that the cops know I never threaten anyone
Virtual Asylumis this guy from NS or elsewhere?
CaperThey bid on the contract. They get it by underbidding then cry they don’t have enough money to provide the level of service established in the contract
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@Little Grey Cells don't forget the key ingredient to full integration and interoperability SNACKS LOTS OF SNACKS 🤣🤣
David AmosHere we go with the COINTEL BULLSHT AGAIN EH?
Little Grey CellsSnack bus
robert thomasI wasn't trolling you @David Amos I was asking you a question and then you went onto my youtube channel and decided to make it personal
Green Bastardprobably 1k phone bill coming
Little Grey CellsShort snack bus
CaperHis family is originally from NewWaterford cape Breton ns
Mizz FoxxDavid wtf chill
Virtual Asylumok thanks Caper
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@Little Grey Cells all agencies need a tactical armoured snack mobile 🤣🤣
J DoneMight have been able to outfit the whole detachment if they skipped some of the LEAF weeks
Little Grey CellsWortman/Banfield get 1k phone bills... please dont tell me you are like that lolz
robert thomasquoting something I said in a video I posted for some reason about something unrelated to this rather than answering a simple question..
David Amosi TAKE TROLLS AND THEIR WORDS PERSONALLY
Green Bastardwe are used to public safety being reduced
Little Grey CellsNot aware of an audit. DOJ lawyer KNOWS
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@Little Grey Cells oh and don't forget the support ducks key to any good government op
Green Bastardto the level I'm trained? you don't have any answers for for your level of training
Little Grey CellsSo was an audit being done? Campbell said he wasn't aware but DOJ lawyer would KNOW
robert thomaswell you were being a troll and then you threatened to call everyone in Nova Scotia with my name so that we could talk... but no I am not supposed to take that as a threat
David AmosTHE BETTER QUESTION IS WHO AUDITS THE AUDITORS???
Julia RockWouldn’t a lawyer know this?
Little Grey CellsDOJ lawyer would Julia
Green Bastard@ Little grey they had some looks of annoyance
Forever Chippernurses been doing 24 hour schedules forever
Baylin is a cross dressing LEAF@Little Grey Cells that RCMP audit would be on a secure O drive to be found at a reuse it center in the near future 😜
Little Grey CellsBC is kicking RCMP out
Little Grey CellsIndo is a huntin
Green Bastardindo lol
Julia RockHappy they want to work along side one another?
Green Bastardget out of NS
Green Bastardwe have low rcmp
Green Bastardstandards
Green Bastardto be clear
David AmosANYONE CAN READ MY COMMENTS BETTER YET DID I CALL ANYONE BUT THE RCMP AND HOST OF LAWYERS BEFORE THE SHIT HIT THE FAN TODAY?
Center HiceHow's it going Seamus, and all . This case has been a nightmare 😳
Virtual Asylumgreen bastard of course they did...alot of people around here have the "go along to get along attitude" until something happens to them. Selfish people.




Criminal charge withdrawn against spouse of Nova Scotia mass killer

HALIFAX -

The criminal charge against Lisa Banfield for providing ammunition to the gunman who killed 22 Nova Scotians in April 2020 has been withdrawn.

Crown prosecutor Sarah Lane told Judge Theodore Tax at the provincial court in Dartmouth, N.S., that Banfield has successfully completed the restorative justice process and that the Crown is withdrawing the charge against her.

Banfield was charged in March with unlawfully providing her common-law spouse with ammunition in the month leading up to the mass killings.

Banfield, her brother and brother-in-law were charged with giving Gabriel Wortman .223-calibre Remington cartridges and .40-calibre Smith and Wesson cartridges.

Police have said all three had no prior knowledge of the killer's plans.

Nova Scotia's restorative justice program creates opportunities for people accused of crimes and victims of crime to work together to come to resolutions, permitting suspects to avoid criminal records.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 26, 2022.

This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Meta and Canadian Press News Fellowship.

MCC - DAY 57 - DARREN CAMPBELL (PART 2)

$
0
0

 

RCMP Supt. Darren Campbell discusses the timeline of events and locations of the Nova Scotia shootings at RCMP headquarters in Dartmouth, N.S., in this April 2020 file photo.

An e-mailed statement from the force says Chief Superintendent John Robin is departing as leader of the team, as he is married to Halifax RCMP Chief Supt. Janis Gray.

Retired RCMP Staff Sergeant Mike Butcher, husband of Nova Scotia Assistant Commissioner Lee Bergerman, is also now off the team.

The force says Chief Supt. Michael O’Malley will assume leadership of the project team in August, adding that Chief Supt. Robin and Staff Sgt. Butcher have “asked to step away.”

The inquiry into the rampage of April 18-19, 2020, includes a mandate to probe in detail what happened during the 13-hour killing spree, including the police response and communication with the public and the families of the 22 people killed by the gunman.

The RCMP say they had assigned Chief Supt. Robin and Staff Sgt. Butcher to the team because of their qualifications and experience, but they say concerns were later raised about the appearance of a conflict of interest.

After an internal review, the force says the two officers stepped away to ensure the Mass Casualty Commission “remains a defendable, credible and transparent process.”

Staff Sgt. Butcher’s wife, Assistant Commissioner Bergerman, recently announced she will retire in early October, days before the Mass Casualty Commission begins public hearings.

Story continues below advertisement

The hearings are scheduled from Oct. 26 until Dec. 10, with an interim report due in May, 2022, and a final report six months later.

http://www.cacole.ca/confere-reunion/2021/MichaelOMalley.shtml

 

Superintendent Michael O’Malley

Michael O’Malley has been the Director of the RCMP National Public Complaints Directorate since November 2018. His postings include locations in the Maritimes, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, back to the Maritimes and now in the National Capital Region. He was appointed to Commissioned Officer in 2005. Michael has been a detachment and district commander. He was responsible for provincial, regional and national programs. The majority of his RCMP service has been in operational Divisions.  He has significant experience in Aboriginal Policing, Restorative Justice, working with Elders and local Justices of the Peace to address social problems from my eleven years living in indigenous communities. Michael served multiple terms on the Board of Directors for the New Brunswick Canadian Mental Health Association.

 

 cacole.executivedirector@gmail.com

 

 

FEDERAL COURT File No. T-1347-20 

BETWEEN:


BRITISH COLUMBIA CIVIL LIBERTIES ASSOCIATION
Applicant


and


ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE COMMISSIONER BRENDA
LUCKI, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH
COLUMBIA, as represented by the MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND
SOLICITOR GENERAL
Respondents
 

AFFIDAVIT OF MICHAEL O'MALLEY
(Affirmed February 3, 2021)
 

I, Michael O'Malley, of the City of Ottawa, in the Province of Ontario,
AFFIRM THAT:


Background:
1. I have been a member of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police ("RCMP")
since July 1987. I started with the RCMP as a non-commissioned officer
and worked in general duty positions in New Brunswick, the Northwest
Territories and Nunavut. In 2005, I became a commissioned officer in the
RCMP. I have worked in various positions as a commissioned officer
including District Commander (2006 to 2011 ), Atlantic Region Corporate
Planning and Client Services Officer (2011 to 2012), District Policing Officer
(2012 to 2014), and Atlantic Region Employee Management Relations
Officer (2014 to 2015). In July 2015, I transferred to Ottawa and assumed
the position of Director, Technical Operations Strategic Services Branch. I
was promoted into my current rank of Superintendent in 2012.

 


 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=POvbJq6WTPM&ab_channel=LittleGreyCells 

 


MCC - DAY 57 - DARREN CAMPBELL (PART 2)

650 views
Streamed live 9 hours ago
3.44K subscribers
David Amos
TAH TAH MR CAMPBELL
 
Lockdown Design
Hi just listening while working
 
 
 

 

Criminal charge withdrawn against spouse of Nova Scotia mass killer

HALIFAX -

The criminal charge against Lisa Banfield for providing ammunition to the gunman who killed 22 Nova Scotians in April 2020 has been withdrawn.

Crown prosecutor Sarah Lane told Judge Theodore Tax at the provincial court in Dartmouth, N.S., that Banfield has successfully completed the restorative justice process and that the Crown is withdrawing the charge against her.

Banfield was charged in March with unlawfully providing her common-law spouse with ammunition in the month leading up to the mass killings.

Banfield, her brother and brother-in-law were charged with giving Gabriel Wortman .223-calibre Remington cartridges and .40-calibre Smith and Wesson cartridges.

Police have said all three had no prior knowledge of the killer's plans.

Nova Scotia's restorative justice program creates opportunities for people accused of crimes and victims of crime to work together to come to resolutions, permitting suspects to avoid criminal records.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 26, 2022.

This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Meta and Canadian Press News Fellowship.

 
 
 

BREAKING: Federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair says that a public inquiry will be held into the Nova Scotia Shooting.
Image
Replying to @AlexanderQuon
Full story here:
Hmmmm
 
 

Laura Lynn Tyler Thompson
Replying to @AlexanderQuon
See my interview from this morning with Nova Scotia journalist Paul Palango on the disturbing facts of this case. youtu.be/YjxatZIus_o
They reword the statement and people eat it up. So they'll ask all the questions, compile all the info, and then tell us, the public which info is relevant. How is this any different than what they said before? Is this actually a change, or a trick?
 
 

Show replies
Replying to @AlexanderQuon
Unbelievable! Nova Scotians will never forget that these politicians were ready to abandon the families of these shooting victims, and only backed down after being shamed into it. Shame on them.
 
Image

Show replies
 


Replying to @AlexanderQuon
They didn’t want to. I wonder what changed their minds.
 


 
 

Victims’ families warn Mass Casualty Commission may be set up to fail

 
 
Nick Beaton (right), Kristen Beaton's husband, leads hundreds of people on a march to the RCMP detachment in Bible Hill on Wednesday, July 22, 2020, as an effort to keep the pressure on the provincial and federal governments to call a public inquiry into the mass shooting on April 18 and 19 
Nick Beaton (right), Kristen Beaton's husband, leads hundreds of people on a march to the RCMP detachment in Bible Hill on Wednesday, July 22, 2020, as an effort to keep the pressure on the provincial and federal governments to call a public inquiry into the mass shooting on April 18 and 19. But recently, Beaton said the lack of information being provided to the families has essentially made the public inquiry "the review that we fought against." - Nicole Munro / File

Lawyers representing the families of many of the Portapique massacre’s victims are warning that the Mass Casualty Commission may already be failing their clients.

“I don’t think there is a single client who feels satisfied with the information they have received thus far,” said Sandra McCulloch, a lawyer at the firm Patterson Law, which represents 23 families of the victims of the April 2020 killings.

“More problematically, based on the way things are at this point, many are discouraged in the belief that they will walk away from this proceeding with as many unanswered questions (as they have now).”

The Mass Casualty Commission is scheduled to begin hearings in Halifax on Feb. 22 that will run until late fall.

The commission’s stated role is to “provide clarity around the causes, context and circumstances that led to the April 2020 mass casualty in Nova Scotia and make meaningful recommendations to help keep communities safer in the future.”

Patterson Law took the unusual step of issuing a public statement on Monday evening laying out their concerns.

They include a lack of information about who would be called as witnesses, whether they will be cross-examined by lawyers representing the families of victims, what documents would be made available and whether objections could be raised to evidence not presented during the hearings or lawyers could seek to have brought forward.

McCulloch explained that as far as she could tell, lawyers representing the families would have to justify to the commission the necessity of cross-examining each witness. However, they still don’t know at what point before, during or after the testimony they would get to seek approval to cross-examine the witness.

The plan is markedly different than during the Desmond Fatality Inquiry hearings into the 2017 quadruple murder-suicide carried out in Guysborough County by Afghan War veteran Lionel Desmond.

That inquiry saw lawyers representing each of the families involved, along with other individuals and institutions, have the opportunity to ask questions of each witness automatically after the initial testimony.

“Aside from our frustration about a lack of detail about the schedule of the public proceedings, we hold fear that evidentiary matters which we, on behalf of our clients, will fail to be fully explored by the commission,” reads the Patterson Law statement.

McCulloch said her firm has raised their concerns with the commission but with seven days left before hearings begin and with a lack of satisfactory response thus far, they felt it important to make them public.

Commission senior counsel Emily Hill responded to the concerns in a written statement.

“Over the past number of months, (participants) have had a critical role in shaping the factual record,” wrote Hill.

“Since the fall, we have provided family members, through their counsel, information weekly. This includes drafts of the Commission’s Foundational Documents and tens of thousands of pages of information, including transcripts of 911 calls, witness interviews, security camera footage from April 18 & 19 2020, notes and investigative files, information about the police responses on April 18 & 19 2020 and more. We also asked for, and acted on, their input through written requests and weeks of meetings. This included input on areas for further investigation by the Commission.”

Hill said that throughout the hearings there will be opportunities for the families and other participants to raise their concerns with gaps in the record and suggest witnesses to be interviewed.

“A public inquiry is not a trial, nor is it about assigning blame,” wrote Hill.

“Public inquiries are about change. The Commission’s work is to determine what happened and why and how it happened in order to make recommendations that will help make sure it does not happen again.”

The commission was established in response to public outrage at both the provincial and federal governments when they first announced a review, to be held behind closed doors, into the killings.

In a written statement, Nicholas Beaton, whose wife and unborn child were killed by the gunman, warned that the commission runs the risk of falling far short of its goals.

“This has been the review that we fought against,” wrote Beaton.

“We wanted the tools that a public inquiry would give us, that a review would not. … All this has done is cost taxpayers millions of dollars, only to give us a review anyway.”

 

 

 

 
 

Former prime minister Stephen Harper endorses Pierre Poilievre for Conservative leadership

$
0
0

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nt73qsSWtGY

 

Former prime minister Stephen Harper endorses Pierre Poilievre for Conservative leadership

5,173 views
Jul 26, 2022
 3.14M subscribers
Three strategists join Power & Politics to discuss what an endorsement from former prime minister Stephen Harper means for Pierre Poilievre's campaign, as well as the rest of the leadership race.
David Amos
Too Too Funny
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: Jean Charest <messages@jeancharest.ca>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2022 19:11:52 -0400
Subject: You have a place in a Conservative Party led by me | Vous avez une place dans un Parti conservateur dirigé par moi
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
 
 
 
Charest,-Jean-logo---Blue-Bilingual-EN-FR

« Le français suivra »

David,

 

Justin Trudeau's government is falling apart. We need to defeat him and his NDP-Liberal coalition, but to do so, we must be united as one voice.

 

These past months have seen a lot of anger and many accusations flying between campaigns. It damages our Party and our message, but worst of all, it damages our ability to come together when the leadership campaign is over.

 

There are real concerns about a split in the Party again if we don't deal with this.

 

So I want to say to you here and now: when I am Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, YOU will be welcome in our party.

 

I recognize that many of us have different opinions and beliefs, but our ability to unite despite our differences has been our greatest strength. No other party in Canada has been able to bring together such a diverse set of groups with a common vision.

 

Your voice in this coalition is important. It helps bring perspective and representation to the decision table, even if we don't all always agree with one another.

 

What unites us is greater than where we differ. As a leader, I understand and respect this.

 

I respect you and your beliefs, and there is room at my table for you to be part of the discussion.

 

We may not always agree on the final direction chosen, but it is absolutely critical to our unity that your voice is heard!

 

That is the kind of Conservative Party I want to lead, and the kind of Conservative Party I want you to be a part of.

 

We need to agree on this now before divisiveness pushes us too far away from one another.

 

We are all stronger together, and only together are we going to defeat Justin Trudeau.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jean Charest

 

P.S. If you agree with me that as a Party we must remain united and respectful of each other, let me know by tapping here and mark me as your FIRST choice on the ballot!

   

David,

 

Le gouvernement de Justin Trudeau s'effondre. Nous devons le vaincre, lui et sa coalition néo-démocrate-libérale, mais pour ce faire, nous devons parler d'une seule voix.

 

Nous avons été témoins de beaucoup de colère dans les derniers mois et de nombreuses accusations voler entre les campagnes. Cela nuit à notre parti et à notre message, mais pire que tout, cela nuit à notre capacité de nous unir une fois la campagne à la direction terminée.

 

Il y a de réelles inquiétudes quant à une nouvelle scission si nous ne nous occupons pas de cela.

 

Alors je veux vous dire ici et maintenant : quand je serai chef du Parti conservateur du Canada, VOUS serez les bienvenus.

 

Je sais que beaucoup d'entre nous ont des opinions et des croyances différentes, mais notre capacité à nous unir malgré nos différences a toujours été notre plus grande force. Aucun autre parti au Canada n'a été en mesure de réunir un ensemble aussi diversifié de groupes différents partageant une vision commune.

 

Votre voix dans cette coalition est importante. Cela contribue à ajouter de la perspective et une meilleure représentation à la table de décision, même si nous ne sommes pas toujours d'accord les uns avec les autres.

 

Ce qui nous unit est plus grand que ce qui nous divise. En tant que leader, je comprends et respecte cela.

 

Je vous respecte, vous et vos croyances, et il y a de la place à ma table pour que vous participiez à la discussion.

 

Nous ne sommes peut-être pas toujours d'accord sur la direction finale choisie, mais il est absolument essentiel pour notre unité que votre voix soit entendue&nbsp;!

 

C'est le genre de Parti conservateur que je veux diriger, et le genre de Parti conservateur dont je veux que vous fassiez partie.

 

Nous devons nous mettre d'accord là-dessus maintenant avant que les divisions ne nous éloignent trop les uns des autres.

 

Nous sommes tous plus forts ensembles, et ce n'est qu'ensemble que nous allons battre Justin Trudeau.

 

Sincèrement,

 

Jean Charest

 

P.S. Si vous êtes d'accord avec moi qu'en tant que parti, nous devons rester unis et respectueux les uns envers les autres, faites-le moi savoir en appuyant ici et en m’inscrivant comme votre PREMIER choix sur votre bulletin de vote!

   

Follow the team that's Built to Win.

Suivez le mouvement Bâti pour gagner.

Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Instagram
   

Copyright © 2022 Jean Charest Campaign, All rights reserved.

Droits d’auteur © 2022 Jean Charest Campaign. Tous les droits sont réservés.

Jean Charest Campaign, 500-30 Wellington Street West, Commerce Court South, Toronto, Ontario, M5L 1E2, Canada

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

Viewing all 3459 articles
Browse latest View live