Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all 3457 articles
Browse latest View live

Hey Higgy Methinks your buddy Cardy must have ran out of butter tarts N'esy Pas??

$
0
0

 

 ---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:43:27 +0000
Subject: RE: Hey Higgy Methinks your buddy Cardy must have ran out of
butter tarts N'esy Pas??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write.

Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
at the earliest opportunity.

If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
review and consideration.

Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
pour examen et considération.


If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144 or by email
media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-

Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>





---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:42:23 -0300
Subject: Hey Higgy Methinks your buddy Cardy must have ran out of
butter tarts N'esy Pas??
To: oipcns@novascotia.ca, Chris.dEntremont@parl.gc.ca,
"Bernadette.Jordan"<Bernadette.Jordan@parl.gc.ca>,
lenametlege.diab@parl.gc.ca, jean.laroche@cbc.ca, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
andrew <andrew@frankmagazine.ca>, micote <micote@postmedia.com>, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, mlcohen@eastlink.ca, "Heather.McPherson"
<Heather.McPherson@parl.gc.ca>, "Health.Minister"
<Health.Minister@novascotia.ca>, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca,
JUSTMIN <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, "Karen.Hudson"
<Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca>, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca,
Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca, Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/11/need-i-be-redundant-say-pure-d-bullshit.html



---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 20:46:49 +0000
Subject: RE: Need I be redundant say PURE D BULLSHIT TWICE???
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 16:46:41 -0400
Subject: Need I be redundant say PURE D BULLSHIT TWICE???
To: Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, jharmon@boyden.com, Info@pic.alberta.ca,
Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Frank.McKenna@td.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, jkee@google.com,
DDrummond@google.com, colinmckay@google.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Cardy, Dominic (LEG)"Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:56:35 +0000
Subject: RE: ATTN Sigríður Á. Andersen, Bjarni Benediktsson and
Gudlaugur Thór Thórdarson, RE Federal Court File No T-1557-15 I just
called your offices Again
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Cc: "Wright, Hamish (LEG)"Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca

Mr. Amos,

Did you know that they eat puffins in Iceland?? Puffins!

Full disclosure: I have a cat named Puffin but she is (a) not from
Iceland; (b) does not eat puffins; (c) has no discernible central
nervous system - though I guess that is my cross to bear, as a
responsible cat owner, and not yours, as a public nuisance.

Did you enjoy your butter tart substitute? I was expecting a thank you
note but then I realized you were likely very busy suing the
government of Rwanda for using the wrong sort of hand cream or
something equally important.

Sincerely,

Dominic

-----Original Message-----
From: "Washington Field"<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 5:13 PM
To: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,Subject: RE: Attn Cst Paul Lynch RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15
and your continued support of Barry Winters and his malevolent cohorts
for one year since you first contacted me.

The FBI Washington Field Office is in receipt of your emails. It is
unclear as to what your complaint is. In order for us to properly
assess your complaint, you will need to provide the following details:
- Your name and contact information
- Full Details about the fraud/crime and a time line of events
- Any bio-data you have on the subject (address, email address, name, etc…)
- Any supporting/collaborating evidence you might have about the crime/subject
Upon providing the above information, the FBI, depending on the
circumstances, may work with other federal and local agencies to
ensure that the fraud or crime is investigated.

Please also be advised that  the Washington Field Office FBI is
responsible for investigating federal violations in the Washington
D.C. metropolitan area, to include areas of Northern Virginia.  The
FBI has 56 field offices throughout the United States, with multiple
satellite Resident Agencies covering rural areas related to these 56
field offices.  If you know which state the crime/subject came from,
please know that the complaint will be forwarded to that State’s FBI
Field Office. Attached is a link with the contact information for each
Field Office: http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field/listing_by_state


Thank you for your communication.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-land-acknowledgment-racist-1.6224063

 

2 PC ministers slammed Higgs's land acknowledgment policy

In internal email, Jill Green and Dominic Cardy said policy makes government appear racist

Two Progressive Conservative cabinet members strongly criticized the Higgs government's new policy on land acknowledgements, saying it could create a perception the government is racist.

In an internal email Oct. 15, Transportation and Infrastructure Minister Jill Green and Education and Early Childhood Minister Dominic Cardy urged Premier Blaine Higgs to withdraw the policy and apologize for it.

"The memo sent to all GNB employees on Thursday, October 14, has added an unnecessary conflict that is creating confusion and justifiable anger toward our government," Green and Cardy wrote in the email obtained by CBC News.

But they backed down within hours after an urgent meeting with the premier, according to a second email.

The new policy bans government officials from acknowledging that New Brunswick sits on "unceded" and "unsurrendered" Indigenous land.

The two ministers wrote in their first email that they saw "no plan" to improve the relationship with First Nations and said the memo, and other government moves, "raise questions about our sincerity, our competence, and whether we are the racists our opponents claim."

Premier Blaine Higgs said the two ministers had 'overreacted' to the new policy and were 'apologetic' after the meeting with him. (Government of New Brunswick/YouTube)

In another passage, they said government moves like the new policy "create the impression of a government intentionally reinforcing racist behaviour."

The ministers sent the email to the premier just before 4 p.m. on Friday, Oct. 15. It was addressed to Higgs and was copied to his chief of staff Louis Leger, clerk of the executive council Cheryl Hansen and all PC MLAs.

The criticism prompted an immediate meeting with Higgs and his deputy minister of strategic initiatives and communications Nicolle Carlin, according to the second email.

Shortly after 6 p.m. the same day, Green and Cardy thanked Higgs "for the productive meeting … and for understanding and listening to our concerns." 

In the second email they tell Higgs they "share your commitment to build a new relationship with First Nations and the need for a strategy to broaden the conversation beyond a purely legal focus." 

They also refer twice to the need to work together, and they invited Higgs to set aside time at the next PC caucus meeting "to share your vision for a province where all citizens, no matter their backgrounds, feel a part of one New Brunswick." 

Green said the meeting with Higgs was "very heated" but satisfied her.

"We were all able to be heard and talk about our concerns, and talk about the balance between the legal suits and the human side of things, and how it's important for us to try to recognize both in our pathway forward. … It was a very good discussion." 

She said in an interview she was concerned the memo would create "confusion" among her departmental staff and would also hurt her ability to deal with St. Mary's First Nation in her Fredericton North riding.

The reference to a perception of racism "was an echoing of what I'd been hearing in messages from my constituents and others around me," she said.

    In a memo leaked earlier this month, New Brunswick Attorney General Ted Flemming said the policy against title acknowledgments followed advice from lawyers for the government. (Joe McDonald/CBC)

Cardy, whose Fredericton West-Hanwell riding includes Kingsclear First Nation, said he was hearing the same thing.

He said the second email wasn't a retraction of his criticisms but a way of telling the PC caucus that Higgs had followed up.

"Something that I've always admired about him is a tolerance for discussion, dissent and debate," Cardy said.

Higgs said in an interview that Green and Cardy had "genuine concerns" and he didn't insist they fall in line or resign.

But he also said they had "overreacted" to the new policy and were "apologetic" after the meeting with him.

"There was certainly a regret that the letter was sent."

Higgs's office also released a detailed response from Aboriginal Affairs Minister Arlene Dunn in which she said recent land title litigation, "by its very nature, implies something is broken" but said there is a plan to improve the relationship.

Officials have been reviewing all Indigenous initiatives to ensure they comply with the law and respect First Nations'  rights to set the stage for new discussions, she said. 

"I am pleased to report that this process is nearing completion."

This is an enormously complicated file with all kinds of elements around it that are just starting to to be discussed
- Dominic Cardy, minister

She said while some decisions in the early part of the review "are difficult or uncomfortable," they would allow the province to create "a solid foundation" for a better relationship in the future.

Green said in an interview she hadn't been aware of the breadth of that review.

"Do we each know everything about each other's files? No. And her email was fantastic. It's a great summary of all the work that's ongoing … I didn't know all of everything, so I'm definitely glad she sent that to us." 

Cardy said he was familiar with Dunn's work already but wanted Higgs to articulate "a broader vision" of what an inclusive New Brunswick would look like, including a better relationship with First Nations. 

Following the email exchange and a "really good caucus conversation" on Oct. 19,  "we've certainly moved quite a long way down that road, and that's all for the good," he said. 

"This is an enormously complicated file with all kinds of elements around it that are just starting to to be discussed, and we have to be very careful in the way we handle it.

"There was clearly an understanding from he premier's side that that was understood, and MInister Dunn's been doing a lot of incredible work behind the scenes." 

Wolstoqey land claim filed

Attorney General Ted Flemming sent the new land acknowledgement policy to all government employees on Oct. 14.

Land acknowledgments have become common at many events, ceremonies and performances in the province.

But Flemming wrote that referring to New Brunswick as "unceded and unsurrendered" territory could hurt the province's case in land title litigation filed by Wolastoqey chiefs that covers 60 per cent of the province.

The memo said government employees are allowed to refer to the province as "the ancestral homelands" of those nations but would not be punished for talking about unceded or unsurrendered territory.

The memo sparked angry reactions from Indigenous people and others, but Higgs said it was necessary to clarify legal issues raised in the lawsuit as a way of getting to a better relationship.

"Yes, it involves tough discussions, especially when we're being sued, and it involves us putting all the facts on the table, so I think emotions run high sometimes, and some folks are more emotional than others, as we know," he said.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit.

 
 
 


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:38:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Larry Tremblay 506-452-3400 I just called
If the RCMP wish to continue to harrass me please have your minions
use real names with real phone numbers like Cst. Amy Sturgeon did
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.
 
 
 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:43:25 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Higgy Methinks your buddy Cardy must
have ran out of butter tarts N'esy Pas??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.

Thanks again for your email.
______­­

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:42:29 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.

As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
correspondence identified as requiring a response.

We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2Fcoronavirus%2F&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367672291%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=w%2BOsM5R7MFVxiqyjO2BAf6%2Bhyqwk%2FlhJgFPZiux%2FdlI%3D&reserved=0>
or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcanada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367682286%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VcH333SLZ540PWKlS5TJm0KVV0P8TdSq5MAG%2FwTfSV0%3D&reserved=0>.
You can also call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.

If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
https://811.novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F811.novascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367692284%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=0EfyFucV6pzKpjejXy0yxg1gQGxY%2BycmQ5AH9gF0VqU%3D&reserved=0>/
and use the COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you
determine if you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet
access, call 811.

Thank you,

Premier’s Correspondence Team



 ---------- Original message ----------
From: Justice Minister <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:42:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Higgy Methinks your buddy Cardy must
have ran out of butter tarts N'esy Pas??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to the Minister of Justice. Please be assured
that it has been received by the Department. Your email will be
reviewed and addressed accordingly. Thank you.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Information Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia <oipcns@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:42:30 +0000
Subject: OIPC Auto-Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for emailing the Office of the Information and Privacy
Commissioner for Nova Scotia (OIPC).  We will strive to respond to
inquiries as soon as possible and usually respond within four business
days.

Please note that our office does not respond to or take any action on
emails that we are copied on.

If you have submitted a new request for review or other file-related
correspondence, please note that this email is the OIPC’s confirmation
of receipt. If you have submitted a request for review, your request
for review file with the OIPC has entered the intake stage. Files at
the intake stage are addressed in the chronological order they are
received. You will receive a separate notice regarding your request
for review, usually within one to two months.

The OIPC does not process access to information requests. If you are
making an access to information request, please send it to the public
body, municipality or health custodian that has the records you are
seeking:  Public Body Contact
Information<https://oipc.novascotia.ca/PB_Contact#overlay-context=publictools>.

Regards,

[Logo no text]

Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Nova Scotia
Telephone: 902.424.4684; Toll free within NS: 1.866.243.1564
TDD: 1.800.855.0511;  Fax: 1.902.424.8303

https://oipc.novascotia.ca
Follow us on Twitter @NSInfoPrivacy

Notice:  This email may contain confidential information and is
intended only for the individual named.  If you have  received this
email by mistake, please notify me by email or by calling
1-902-424-4684 immediately and delete it from your system. Do not copy
or distribute it.






---------- Original message ----------
From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:42:28 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
of the Premier.

We appreciate the time you have taken to write.


NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has
reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.

Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
copie. Merci de votre cooperation.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:42:32 +0000
Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of The Honourable Kelvin Goertzen, Premier of Manitoba, we
would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.

Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
earliest opportunity.

 Thank you for taking the time to write.

Premier’s Correspondence Team
Executive Council
Government of Manitoba

*******************************

Au nom du premier ministre du Manitoba, M. Kelvin Goertzen, nous
accusons réception de votre courriel.

 Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatisée pour vous
informer que votre courriel a été reçu et qu’il sera examiné dans les
meilleurs délais.

 Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
Conseil exécutif
Gouvernement du Manitoba



---------- Original message ----------
From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX"<Premier@gov.bc.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:44:12 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Higgy Methinks your buddy Cardy must
have ran out of butter tarts N'esy Pas??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to write. Due to the volume of incoming
messages, this is an automated response to let you know that your
email has been received and will be reviewed at the earliest
opportunity. If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the
mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer
your email for review and consideration.

For information on COVID-19, please refer to the resources below:

BC’s Immunization Plan is designed to save lives and stop the spread
of COVID-19. For more information on COVID-19 vaccines and how to get
vaccinated, please visit:
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/covid-19/vaccine/plan

Masks are required in all public indoor settings for people 12 and
older to help slow the transmission of COVID-19. Additionally, proof
of vaccination is required to access some events, services and
businesses. Further details on the BC Vaccine Card, mask mandates and
BC’s Restart is available here:
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/covid-19/info/response

If you or a family member believes they are displaying symptoms of
COVID-19, please complete the BC COVID-19 Self-Assessment Tool:
https://covid19.thrive.health/<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcovid19.thrive.health%2F&data=04%7C01%7CPremier%40gov.bc.ca%7C9797e6e430354eaf3d2f08d98f5785bb%7C6fdb52003d0d4a8ab036d3685e359adc%7C0%7C0%7C637698428327989606%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=vJhFouV6ly8Xh%2BUOv%2FQkgrh7ddQAsmOxhwVeAXlNTM8%3D&reserved=0>.
If the tool advises you are demonstrating relevant symptoms, please
call 8-1-1 to speak with a healthcare professional.

For the answers to common questions about COVID-19, please visit:
https://www.healthlinkbc.ca/health-feature/coronavirus-disease-covid-19<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.healthlinkbc.ca%2Fhealth-feature%2Fcoronavirus-disease-covid-19&data=04%7C01%7CPremier%40gov.bc.ca%7C9797e6e430354eaf3d2f08d98f5785bb%7C6fdb52003d0d4a8ab036d3685e359adc%7C0%7C0%7C637698428327999563%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=YnOiCHoehFKNktmUdAo7p541HDOq4%2BdTe%2BneWMm%2FRnA%3D&reserved=0>
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19

Again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,

John Horgan
Premier


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Jordan, Bernadette - M.P."<Bernadette.Jordan@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:42:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Higgy Methinks your buddy Cardy must
have ran out of butter tarts N'esy Pas??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Constituency Office of Hon. Bernadette
Jordan, Member of Parliament for South Shore - St. Margaret's.

This is an automatic confirmation of receipt of your message.

The constituency office deals exclusively with matters pertaining to
the riding of South Shore - St. Margaret's and its constituents. If
you have not done so already, please include your full name, address,
and postal code in your message.

If you are writing to Minister Jordan in her capacity as Minister of
Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard, please note we will
forward your email to the Ministry's correspondence office. For any
follow-up or future correspondence, please contact them directly at:
Min@dfo-mpo.gc.ca<mailto:min@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>.

Please note that we receive a high volume of messages and responses
can be delayed. If you are a constituent of South Shore - St.
Margaret's and require urgent assistance, please call our office at
902-527-5655.

Thank you for your note and patience as we respond to a large number
of messages.

Best,


MP Staff to Hon. Bernadette Jordan



---------- Original message ----------
From: "McPherson, Heather - M.P."<Heather.McPherson@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:42:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Higgy Methinks your buddy Cardy must
have ran out of butter tarts N'esy Pas??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

[le français suit]

Thank you for contacting the office of Heather McPherson, MP for
Edmonton Strathcona.

If you are a constituent looking for assistance with federal programs,
please make sure that you have given your full name, address, and
phone number.

If you are in need of urgent help, the following services are
available via telephone:

  *   Emergency needs (food, clothing, shelter): 1-866-644-5135
  *   Mental Health Distress Line: 780-482-4357
  *   Mental Health Live Chat: 1-877-302-2642 (available weekday day &
evenings + weekend afternoons)
  *   Seniors Abuse Helpline: 780-454-8888
  *   Family violence info line: 780-310-1818
  *   Child and family crisis support: 1-800-638-0715
  *   Child abuse hotline: 1-800-387-5437
  *   Crisis Diversion Team: 211 (Press 3 for the 24/7 Crisis Diversion Team)
  *   Trans Lifeline: 1-877-330-6366
  *   Sexual Assault Centre of Edmonton: 780-423-4121
  *   WIN House Women’s Shelter: 780-479-0058
  *   Lurana Women’s Shelter: 780-424-5875

Below are a few non-emergency phone numbers:

  *   Alberta Health Services: 811
  *   Alberta Health & Seniors Advocates: 780-422-1812
  *   Seniors help line: 211
  *   City of Edmonton help line, including bylaw inquiries such as
parking, construction, noise and/or neighbourhood cleanliness: 311
  *   Alberta Works: 780-644-9992
  *   Edmonton Community Legal Centre: 780-702-1725
  *   Legal Aid: 1-866-845-3425

Constituency Staff,

Heather McPherson
Member of Parliament for Edmonton Strathcona
New Democratic Party of Canada
____________

Merci d’avoir communiqué avec le bureau de Heather McPherson, députée
d’Edmonton Strathcona.

Si vous êtes un concitoyen et que vous voulez de l’aide à propos des
programmes fédéraux, veuillez nous donner votre nom complet, votre
adresse et votre numéro de téléphone.

Si vous avez un urgent besoin d’aide, voici des ressources téléphoniques :

  *   Aide urgente pour les besoins de première nécessité
(ravitaillement, habillement et hébergement) : 1-866-644-5135
  *   Ligne d’écoute pour les personnes en détresse psychologique : 780-482-4357
  *   Clavardage en direct pour la santé mentale : 1-877-302-2642 (le
jour et le soir durant la semaine, l’après-midi durant la fin de
semaine)
  *   Ligne d’assistance pour les aînés victimes de mauvais
traitements : 780-454-8888
  *   Ligne d’information sur la violence familiale : 780-310-1818
  *   Soutien à l’enfance et à la famille en crise : 1-800-638-0715
  *   Numéro d’urgence pour la violence faite aux enfants : 1-800-387-5437
  *   Équipe de déjudiciarisation en situation de crise : 211 (faites
le 3 pour l’équipe disponible en tout temps)
  *   Trans Lifeline : 1-877-330-6366
  *   Centre d’aide aux victimes d’agressions sexuelles d’Edmonton :
780-423-4121
  *   Refuge pour femmes WINhouse : 780-479-0058
  *   Refuge pour femmes Lurana : 780-424-5875

Vous trouverez ci-dessous le numéro de services non urgents :

  *   Services de soins de santé de l’Alberta : 811
  *   Intervenant auprès des personnes âgées et en matière de santé de
l’Alberta : 780-422-1812
  *   Ligne d’aide pour les personnes âgées : 211
  *   Ligne d’aide de la ville d’Edmonton (information concernant le
règlement municipal sur le stationnement, la construction, le bruit et
la propreté des quartiers) : 311
  *   Alberta Works : 780-644-9992
  *   Centre d’aide juridique communautaire d’Edmonton : 780-702-1725
  *   Aide juridique : 1-866-845-3425

Le personnel dans la circonscription,

Heather McPherson
Députée d’Edmonton Strathcona
Nouveau Parti démocratique du Canada




---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 18:42:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.






Marc Garneau is booted out of cabinet and Mélanie Joly becomes Foreign Affairs minister

$
0
0

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Garneau, Marc - Député"<marc.garneau@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 14:50:53 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: "As a church pastor and an attendee, I need
to remember that the government is God's way of maintaining a public
good" Round 2 EH Higgy??
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

(An English message follows)

IMPORTANT

Veuillez noter qu’en raison du COVID-19, nous ne recevrons personne au
bureau. Il nous fera plaisir de vous venir en aide par courriel ou par
téléphone (514-283-2013).

Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. Tenant
compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement,
il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse. Veuillez noter que
dans le traitement de la correspondance, nous devons prioriser les
citoyens de la circonscription de Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount, par
conséquent nous vous invitons à inclure votre adresse résidentielle
dans votre communication.

Pour toutes les questions ou situations qui concernent les Affaires
étrangères Canada, veuillez les envoyer au bureau du ministre à
marc.garneau@international.gc.ca<mailto:marc.garneau@international.gc.ca>


Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Médias seulement : Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez téléphoner :
1-343-203-7700 ou
media@international.gc.ca<

mailto:media@international.gc.ca>


Pour les demandes du public, soyez assuré(e) que nous lirons votre
message attentivement.

Cordialement,

Bureau de l’honorable Marc Garneau,

Député de Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount,

Ministre des Affaires étrangères


***



IMPORTANT


Please note that, because of COVID-19, we will not receive anybody at
our office. We will be happy to help you by email or by phone
(514-283-2013).


Dear Sir/Madam:

Thank you for taking the time to write to us. Due to the high volume
of emails that we receive daily, there may be a delay in our response.
Please note that we give priority to correspondence received from the
constituents of Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount, and as such, we ask
that you include your residential address in your communication.

For matters or questions that relate to Foreign Affairs Canada, kindly
send them to the Minister’s office at
marc.garneau@international.gc.ca<mailto:marc.garneau@international.gc.ca>

Thank you for your understanding.

Media only: For requests from the media, please contact:
1-343-203-7700 or
media@international.gc.ca<mailto:media@international.gc.ca>

For requests from the public, you can rest assured that we will
carefully read your message.

Best regards,

Office of the Honourable Marc Garneau,

MP for Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount

Minister of Foreign Affairs

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: marc.garneau@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:17:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its High Time for legions of
Yankees and Minister Marc Garneau and his many lawyers to do their job
N'esy Pas Maxime Bernier?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

(An English message follows)

Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. Tenant
compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement,
il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse. Veuillez noter que
dans le traitement de la correspondance, nous devons prioriser les
citoyens de la circonscription de Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount, par
conséquent nous vous invitons à inclure votre adresse résidentielle
dans votre communication.

Pour toutes les questions ou situations qui concernent Transports
Canada, veuillez les envoyer au bureau du ministre à
mintc@tc.gc.ca<mailto:mintc@tc.gc.ca>

Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Médias seulement : Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez téléphoner :
1-613-993-0055 ou media@tc.gc.ca<mailto:media@tc.gc.ca>

Pour les demandes du public, soyez assuré(e) que nous lirons votre
message attentivement.

Cordialement,

Bureau de l’honorable Marc Garneau,
Député de Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount,
Ministre des Transports


***

Dear Sir/Madam:

Thank you for taking the time to write to us. Due to the high volume
of emails that we receive daily, there may be a delay in our response.
Please note that we give priority to correspondence received from the
constituents of Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount, and as such, we ask
that you include your residential address in your communication.

For matters or questions that relate to Transport Canada, kindly send
them to the Minister’s office at mintc@tc.gc.ca<mailto:mintc@tc.gc.ca>


Thank you for your understanding.

Media only: For requests from the media, please contact:
1-613-993-0055 or media@tc.gc.ca<mailto:media@tc.gc.ca>

For requests from the public, you can rest assured that we will
carefully read your message.

Best regards,

Office of the Honourable Marc Garneau,
MP for Notre-Dame-de-Grâce-Westmount
Minister of Transport

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Guilbeault, Steven - Député"<Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:17:16 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : YO Melanie Joly ans Pablo Rodriguez
Methinks Steven Guilbeault, his buddy Catherine Tait and all your
former nasty minions in CBC must take courses on playing dumb N'esy
Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Accusé de réception / Acknowledgment of Receipt

Merci d’avoir écrit à Steven Guilbeault, député de
Laurier–Sainte-Marie et ministre du Patrimoine canadien. Ce courriel
confirme la réception de votre correspondance. Veuillez prendre note
que votre demande sera traitée dans les meilleurs délais.

Si votre courriel touche le Patrimoine canadien, veuillez écrire à
hon.steven.guilbeault@canada.ca

Cordialement,
Le bureau de circonscription de Steven Guilbeault

---------------

Thank you for contacting the office of Steven Guilbeault, Member of
Parliament for Laurier–Sainte-Marie and Minister of Canadian Heritage.
This email confirms the receipt of your message. Please note that your
request will be processed as soon as possible.

If your email is with regards to Canadian Heritage, please email
hon.steven.guilbeault@canada.ca

With our best regards,
The constituency office of Steven Guilbeault




 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Anand, Anita - M.P."<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2021 08:18:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Frank Clegg Anita Anand and the Rogers
legal team cannot deny publishing this debate wihile CBC and CTV
denied that I was runing for a seat in Parliament again while suing
the Queen Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Hello,

Thank you for reaching out to the office of Anita Anand, Member of
Parliament for Oakville. Please rest assured that your message will be
brought to her attention and we will make every effort to respond
promptly.

If you have not already included your address and postal code, please
respond to this email with that information. Please note that our
priority is to respond to inquiries from Oakville residents as this
email account is connected to our constituency office in Oakville, ON.
Inquiries relating to the Ministry of Public Services and Procurement
will be forwarded to the appropriate department for consideration and
response.

For the most up to date information on the Coronavirus (COVID-19), you
may visit www.canada.ca/coronavirus. Check back often, as this site
changes daily with updates.

For direct updates from MP Anand, you may visit the following websites
or sign-up for our email list:

  *   www.twitter.com/AnitaOakville<http://www.twitter.com/AnitaOakville>
  *   www.facebook.com/AnitaOakville

<http://www.facebook.com/AnitaOakvile>
  *   www.instagram.com/anitaanandoakville<http://www.instagram.com/anitaanandoakville>
  *   Sign up for our email list<http://eepurl.com/gW3UrH>

Thank you again for reaching out to the office of Anita Anand.


Sincerely yours,

Anita Anand

Member of Parliament/Députée for Oakville

301 Robinson Street, Oakville, Ontario L6J 1G7

Tel: (905) 338-2008


---------- Original message ----------
From: Randy.Boissonnault@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:57:12 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Minister Qualtrough RE "Litigation Lmbo"
Please enjoy an email that you and your fellow members of the PCO
ignored for way past too long
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Hello,

Thank you for writing to my office.  I value hearing from Edmonton
Centre constituents and stakeholders. Your email will be read. My team
and I will be happy to respond.

This email is an automatic response to let you know that your
correspondence has been received. Please do not reply.

As we prioritize responding first to residents of Edmonton Centre,
please provide your postal code, if you have not done so already.

Should you need it, this link will help you confirm who your Member of
Parliament is: https://bit.ly/1BgbGyd.

I will reply as soon as possible whether your issue pertains to you
personally or if you have written to me on a matter related to my
LGBTQ2 responsibilities or other legislative duties.

If another government department or Member of Parliament can better
address your inquiry, we will forward your email to the appropriate
office and invite them to respond to you.

Thank you again for writing to me.

Kind regards,

Randy Boissonnault
Member of Parliament for Edmonton Centre
Special Advisor to the Prime Minister on LGBTQ2 Issues

E-mail: randy.boissonnault@parl.gc.ca<mailto:randy.boissonnault@parl.gc.ca>
Website: http://rboissonnault.liberal.ca/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/R.Boissonnault
Twitter and Instagram: @R_Boissonnault

  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Bonjour,

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? mon bureau. J'appr?cie lire les ?lecteurs et les
intervenants d'Edmonton-Centre. Votre courriel sera lu et mon ?quipe
et moi serons heureux d'y r?pondre.

Ce courriel est une r?ponse automatique pour vous faire savoir que
votre correspondance a bien ?t? re?ue. S'il vous pla?t ne r?pondez
pas.

?tant donn? que nous donnons priorit? aux r?sidents d'Edmonton-Centre,
s'il-vous-pla?t veuillez nous fournir votre code postal si vous ne
l'avez pas d?j? fait.

Au besoin, le lien suivant vous aidera ? confirmer qui est votre
d?put?: https://bit.ly/1CyAl50 .

Je vous r?pondrai d?s que possible si votre enjeux vous concerne
personnellement ou si vous m'avez ?crit sur une question li?e ? mes
responsabilit?s sur les enjeux LGBTQ2 ou ? d'autres t?ches
l?gislatives.

Si un autre service gouvernemental ou un autre membre du Parlement est
dans une meilleure position pour r?pondre ? votre demande, nous
transmettrons votre courriel au bureau appropri? et  les inviterons ?
vous r?pondre.

Merci encore de m'avoir ?crit.

Cordialement,

Randy Boissonnault
D?put? d'Edmonton-Centre
Conseiller sp?cial du premier ministre sur les enjeux LGBTQ2


E-mail: randy.boissonnault@parl.gc.ca<mailto:randy.boissonnault@parl.gc.ca>
Site internet: http://rboissonnault.liberal.ca/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/R.Boissonnault
Twitter et Instagram: @R_Boissonnault

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/chretien-trudeau-better-served-1.6221965 

 

Trudeau would have been 'better served' to listen to party's old guard, says Chrétien

Former PM reflects on challenges of crafting a cabinet, minority governments and lessons from the past

"I'm not there, but sometimes I thought that, you know, they would have been better served if they would have looked to have older, experienced people with them," Chrétien said in an interview airing on Rosemary Barton Live on Sunday. 

Chrétien said he isn't passing judgment on the current Liberal government.

But, in a forthcoming book, he wrote that while "Trudeau and his team aspire to be reformists on a grand scale … their lack of experience for succeeding in that goal is more and more apparent."

Asked about that remark by CBC's chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton, Chrétien said the current crop of Liberals in Ottawa "don't consult me," and that he is fine with that.

"I'm not there. It's not my responsibility," he said. 

Justin Trudeau, right, and Chrétien stand together on stage at an event to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the Canadian flag, in Mississauga Ont., on Feb. 15, 2015. (Chris Young/The Canadian Press)

Chrétien also noted in his book that rejecting politicians, and the politics of the past, are part of the Trudeau Liberals' identity. 

"They say to whoever wants to hear that one of their great successes is in having sidelined the old guard," he wrote in My Stories, My Times, Vol. 2, coming out on Tuesday. 

The former prime minister said that the reason he believes in the value of leaning on the previous generation's experience is because he is a product of that kind of thinking. 

In 1966, Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson, who Chrétien and others referred to as "Mike," promoted him to parliamentary secretary for Mitchell Sharp, then the minister of finance, who took Chrétien under his wing. 

"I benefited from that," he said. "Mitchell Sharp was selected by 'Mike' Pearson to train me and I think that was rather, perhaps, a success."

Crafting a cabinet

Chrétien stressed that he is not criticizing Trudeau's decisions. The former prime minister even campaigned with Trudeau in the most recent election, appearing alongside him at a rally in Mississauga, Ont. He said he is just pointing out that the two men have a very different approach to politics. 

"I don't want to pass judgment, you know. For me, it's not my role. For me, I did it differently," he told Barton.   

Chrétien also spoke about the challenges of putting together a federal cabinet that draws on the strength of a caucus while being representative of the country. 

"It is difficult because you have all sorts of constraints," he said. "You have to have at least one representative from every province and you have the problem of language, of religion, of sex and so on." 

"It's very, very difficult. And you know that for one person who is pleased there's ten who are very unhappy … This is a very difficult task and you're alone." 

Minority governments

Chrétien reflected on how he crafted a cabinet while sitting at a restaurant table in Korea, scratching out names and portfolios on a piece of restaurant stationery that he has kept as a memento. 

He wrote in his book that, while he was a minister in minority governments under Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Pearson, he would have liked to have led a minority government himself. 

"I said to Justin after the second election. I said, 'In a way, you're lucky. I never had a minority government.' For me, who loves politics, I always thought it would be politics at its best," he said.  

Chretien, who oversaw three majority governments between 1993 and 2003, said, as a person who likes brokering deals and compromises, he would "have enjoyed having [a minority government], in a way."

"I preferred to have a majority government and the people of Canada wanted to give me a majority government. So what can I say?"

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QiOisghe_gI&ab_channel=CBCNews

 


Former PM Chrétien reflects on difficulties of forming a cabinet

19,101 views
Oct 24, 2021
2.8M subscribers
Former prime minister Jean Chrétien spoke to CBC chief political correspondent Rosemary Barton about his years in government, Canada's relationship with China and his personal style of politics. 
 
»»» 
 
Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: 
Connect with CBC News Online: For breaking news, video, audio and in-depth coverage:  
Find CBC News on Facebook: 
Follow CBC News on Twitter: 
For breaking news on Twitter:  
Follow CBC News on Instagram:  
Subscribe to CBC News on Snapchat:
Download the CBC News app for iOS: 
Download the CBC News app for Android:
 
 »»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» 
 
For more than 75 years, CBC News has been the source Canadians turn to, to keep them informed about their communities, their country and their world. Through regional and national programming on multiple platforms, including CBC Television, CBC News Network, CBC Radio, CBCNews.ca, mobile and on-demand, CBC News and its internationally recognized team of award-winning journalists deliver the breaking stories, the issues, the analyses and the personalities that matter to Canadians.
David Amos
Too Too Funny

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04eAR3ln8K8&ab_channel=CTVNews

 


One-on-one interview with former prime minister Jean Chretien

92,295 views
Oct 24, 2021
719K subscribers
Evan Solomon sits down with Former Prime Minister Jean Chretien to discuss a wide-range of topics ahead of the release of his new book. 
Subscribe to CTV News to watch more videos:  
Connect with CTV News: For the latest news visit: 
For a full video offering visit the CTV News Network:  
CTV News on Facebook:  
CTV News on Twitter:  
Watch CTV News on Twitter:  
CTV News on Google+:  
CTV News on Instagram: 
 CTV News on Pinterest: 
 CTV News is Canada's most-watched news organization both locally and nationally, and has a network of national, international, and local news operations.
 
David Amos
Oh My My Methinks the not so wise old guy Jean Chretien should learn to clam up N'esy Pas?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iwpkcOs5Xw&ab_channel=CBCNews%3ATheNational 

 


Chrétien under fire for residential school comments

13,186 views
Oct 25, 2021
 1.2M subscribers
WARNING: This story contains distressing details. Former prime minister Jean Chrétien is under fire after saying on the Radio-Canada’s Tout le Monde en Parle he never heard about abuse at residential schools during his tenure as minister of what was then called Indian affairs from 1968 to 1974.

Comments are turned off.

SURPRISE SURPRISE SURPRISE

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/chretien-residential-schools-abuse-minister-1.6224844

 

Residential school abuse reported to department while Jean Chrétien was minister, records show

Chrétien said he never heard of abuse while he was in charge at Indian Affairs

WARNING: This story contains distressing details

While Jean Chrétien was minister of Indian affairs, his federal department received several reports — including one addressed directly to him — of mistreatment and physical abuse of children at residential schools, government records show.

Chrétien, Canada's prime minister from 1993 to 2003, told a popular Radio-Canada talk show on Sunday that he never heard about abuse at residential schools while he was minister of what was then called the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development from 1968 to 1974.

A cursory look at the historical record reveals that while Chrétien was minister, his department received at least four reports outlining allegations of abuse and mistreatment of children at St. Anne's Indian Residential School, which operated in the Fort Albany First Nation, along Ontario's James Bay coast.

The department also received reports of abuse from other residential schools during his tenure, including two from one that sat about 130 kilometres north of his hometown of Shawinigan, Que., records show.

"It's a terrible, terrible thing, when you get that old, you are still consumed in all those lies and there is no shame at all in what you've done to other people in the country," said northern Ontario residential school survivor Mike Cachagee, a member of the Chapleau Cree First Nation who attended three schools.

"It's sad. It just shows you that whole aspect of colonialism and how entrenched it is."

Mike Cachagee, a member of the Chapleau Cree First Nation in northern Ontario, attended three residential schools. (Joe Fiorino/CBC)

During his appearance on Radio-Canada's Tout le monde en parle, Chrétien, 87, said none of his officials ever told him about abuse at residential schools.

"This problem was never mentioned when I was minister. Never," he said.

Report that teacher kept weapons, ammunition

Yet Chrétien's officials were fielding reports of abuse during his tenure at Indian Affairs at a time when the failure of the residential school system was widely and publicly discussed.

Under Chrétien's tenure, the federal government began taking over direct operations of the institutions in 1969 from the churches that ran most of the schools in the system since its inception.

One letter, dated Dec. 28, 1968, was addressed to Chrétien and handwritten by a teacher who taught at Catholic-run St. Anne's residential school.

The letter outlined concerns over how the institution was run.

"The main complaint we had centred around the attitude of the people at the mission toward the [Indigenous] people, which I would to say is prejudicial," said the letter, obtained under the Access to Information Act by NDP MP Charlie Angus, who represents the northern Ontario riding of Timmins—James Bay.

No record has yet surfaced of a reply.

NDP MP Charlie Angus, who represents the northern Ontario riding of Timmins—James Bay, says Chrétien is trying to 'whitewash' the past. (CBC)

Chrétien did not respond to a request for comment from CBC News.

"It is outrageous for Jean Chrétien to try to whitewash his role," Angus said.

In 1971, federal officials received reports that a student claimed they had been "mistreated and discriminated against" by a teacher, and another student claimed they had been kicked by a staff member, according to an entry in the school narrative for the St. Anne's institution, which is posted on the website of the National Centre for Truth and Reconciliation (NCTR).

School narratives outline the basic history of an institution and are primarily based on federal government records. The narratives, compiled by Ottawa, were a key document used in residential school compensation cases.

That same year, a federal government employee reported that another St. Anne's teacher kept weapons and ammunition in class to scare students, according to the narrative. That same teacher faced allegations of beating one student and kicking another, the narrative said.

In 1973, a separate St, Anne's staff member was "reprimanded for offering alcohol to a minor" staying at the school residence and convincing her to drink it, according to the narrative.

The next year, the school principal wrote the Indian agent in Moose Factory, Ont., that the parents and an unnamed First Nation band chief planned to press charges against another teacher at St. Anne's for kicking a child in the face during a physical education class.

"We have tried to explain the situation to the parents and to the chief, but they refuse to recognize the fact that it was an accident," the principal wrote in a Jan, 23, 1974 letter, obtained by CBC News.

Evelyn Korkmaz, who attended St. Anne’s Indian Residential School between 1969 and 1972, says Chrétien should 'just fess up' rather than refuse accountability for the pain caused by institutions he oversaw as a government minister. (Submitted by Evelyn Korkmaz; Stephanie Jenzer/CBC)

Evelyn Korkmaz, a St. Anne's residential school survivor who lives in Ottawa, said it hurt her to hear the former prime minister refuse any accountability for the pain caused by institutions he oversaw as a government minister.

"You should just fess up and say, 'I screwed up, I'm sorry I'm human, I looked the other way. I look back in my past and I regret that I did,'" Korkmaz said. 

Sexual abuse allegations against employee

At the Anglican-run La Tuque residential school, which sat just north of Chrétien's hometown, the federal government launched an inquiry in 1971 into allegations that a former employee "mistreated children, including cutting students' hair as punishment for disobedience," according to the institution's narrative, posted by the NCTR.

A year earlier, an employee was suspended and "discharged" from the institution after four former students went to local police in La Tuque, Que., with allegations they were sexually abused, according to the narrative, which cites several government records.

The narrative does not recount what happened with the complaints.

In 1973, federal officials received reports that a grandparent of two students attending Catholic-run Lebret residential school in Saskatchewan claimed that a supervisor "broke a girl's arm and then laughed" and that two to three supervisors "were cruel towards pupils," according to the narrative.

Historian John Milloy published a book in 1999 on residential schools called A National Crime. The abuse that took place 'was no secret in the department, it wouldn't be a secret' in Chrétien's office, he says. (CBC)

"That [Chrétien] didn't know there were instances of abuse is unimaginable," historian John Milloy said.

Milloy, a professor emeritus at Trent University in Peterborough, Ont., published a book in 1999 on residential schools called A National Crime.

"It was no secret in the department, it wouldn't be a secret in his office," he said in an interview with CBC News.

Failure of residential schools publicly discussed

Milloy's book states that the department regularly received reports of the mistreatment and abuse of children at residential schools throughout the history of the institutions.

By the time Chrétien took over as Indian affairs minister, the failure of the residential school system had been publicly discussed in studies and newspaper articles.

On March 28, 1967, the Edmonton Journal reported that the Alberta government had tabled a report in the legislature that included interviews with five teenage girls who attended Blue Quills residential school. The girls said they left the institution, accusing a priest of "making advances" toward them.

The report's author, Morton Newman, wrote that "Indian Affairs officials corroborated the girls' story," the Journal reported.

That same year, the Canadian Welfare Council released a report by George Caldwell blasting the residential school system as a failure, and the federal department agreed, according to  Milloy's book.

Chrétien, in a 1968 letter, wrote that for Indigenous children, "remaining a member of the family unit can be more beneficial than the best residential school care," according to the book.

Support is available for anyone affected by their experience at residential schools, and those who are triggered by the latest reports.


A national Indian Residential School Crisis Line has been set up to provide support for former students and those affected. People can access emotional and crisis referral services by calling the 24-hour national crisis line: 1-866-925-4419

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jorge Barrera is a Caracas-born, award-winning journalist who has worked across the country and internationally. He works for CBC's Indigenous unit based out of Ottawa. Follow him on Twitter @JorgeBarrera or email him jorge.barrera@cbc.ca.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/jean-chr%C3%A9tien-tlmep-comments-1.6223637 

 

Jean Chrétien says he never heard about abuse in residential schools while he was minister

Chrétien also said in his experience at a conventional boarding school, he 'never had a problem'

WARNING: This story contains distressing details.

Former prime minister Jean Chrétien said Sunday that during his tenure as minister of what was then Indian Affairs, he never heard anything about abuse happening in residential schools. 

Chrétien made the comments during an appearance on the popular Radio-Canada talk show, Tout le Monde en Parle.

"This problem was never mentioned when I was minister. Never," said Chrétien, now 87, of his time in the department from 1968 to 1974.

During the French interview, Chrétien appeared to draw a comparison between his own experience attending a conventional college boarding school as a teenager to that of Indigenous children who were forced to attend residential schools.

"I ate baked beans and oatmeal. And to be sure, it was hard living in a boarding school, extremely hard. Here in Quebec, we had to [in order to get into university]," he said.

"In Shawinigan, we didn't have a college. We had to go to Trois-Rivières or to Joliette," he explained. "We had no choice. It was hard but my parents insisted I go to university and I had to do it."

Chrétien said while he didn't enjoy sleeping in a dorm with 200 others, he "never had a problem."

Stories of physical and sexual abuse of Indigenous children in residential schools were documented in the 2015 Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

More recently, discoveries of unmarked graves on residential school sites have once again brought the issue to the forefront.

Innu author critical of former PM's comments

The former prime minister's comment drew the ire of another guest on the talk show, Innu author Michel Jean.

"Respectfully, I don't think Mr. Chrétien knows exactly what residential schools are," he said.

"The word boarding school makes people think it was a school where we teach people to write, but it wasn't that."

Innu author Michel Jean pushed back against the comments made by Jean Chrétien during the interview. (Radio-Canada)

He said that while Chrétien might recall eating poor-quality food, it doesn't compare to what children in residential schools were subjected to.

"My mother's cousin told me that when there was duck, the nuns would keep the duck meat and cut the feet off, with its toenails still on, boil that in water, and that's what they gave to the kids."

Jean described how members of his own family suffered abuse in residential schools.

"There is someone in my family who attended a residential school in Fort George who was sexually assaulted every day for eight years by a nun," said Jean.

"It was called a boarding school, but it was not a school."

'We can't rewrite history'

Chrétien, who appeared on the talk show to discuss his new book, said that he was aware of the existence of residential schools, but not what was going on there.

In Chrétien's autobiographical book, the former prime minister recounts an anecdote where he advised Queen Elizabeth not to apologize to the Maori people of New Zealand for the harm done to them by the British colonial administration.

Chrétien writes in the book that he told her: "Your Majesty, if you start [apologizing] I will have to bring you to Canada and, since we have several hundred Indigenous communities, you will be on your knees for at least two years."

When asked about this, Chrétien said it's fine to apologize, but "we can't rewrite history. Terrible things happened."

Chrétien went on to defend his record, saying he tried to improve the lives of Indigenous people in Canada, both personally and politically.

"I even adopted an Indigenous son, to lead by example," he said. "This proves my investment in this issue."

The last of the residential school sites in Canada closed in 1997, while Chrétien was prime minister.


How to get help

Support is available for anyone affected by their experience at residential schools, and for those triggered by the latest reports.

A national Indian Residential School Crisis Line has been set up to provide support for residential school survivors and those affected. People can access emotional and crisis referral services by calling the 24-hour national crisis line: 1-866-925-4419.

With files from Radio-Canada, Kate McKenna

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cabinet-announcement-trudeau-1.6225121

 

Anand to defence, Joly to foreign affairs: Trudeau announces major cabinet shakeup

New cabinet announced ahead of Parliament's Nov. 22 return

CBC News special: Liberal cabinet swearing-in ceremony

5 hours ago
Live
CBC's special coverage of Justin Trudeau's new Liberal cabinet ministers being sworn in at Rideau Hall. 0:00

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is kicking off his third mandate with a monumental shift in his cabinet lineup that makes significant changes to senior portfolios.

Governor General Mary May Simon oversaw the swearing-in ceremony this morning at Rideau Hall — which saw nine new faces added to cabinet, three names dropped, some prominent shuffles and the creation of new portfolios ahead of Parliament's return next month.

The new cabinet list adds up to 39 ministers, including Trudeau — slightly larger than the last roster. 

In one of the largest shakeups, Oakville MP Anita Anand becomes only the second woman in Canadian history to take on the role of Defence minister, after former prime minister Kim Campbell in the 1990s.

She inherits a tough job as the Canadian Armed Forces continues to battle a sexual misconduct crisis. Multiple high-ranking military officers have been moved out of their jobs while facing allegations.

As questions about his handling of that crisis continue to swirl, Harjit Sajjan has been bumped to minister of International Development and minister responsible for Pacific Economic Development Canada.

Mélanie Joly received a major promotion this morning, moving up from minister of Economic Development and Official Languages to a much higher profile as Foreign Affairs minister. She served previously as minister of Heritage but took a political hit in her home province of Quebec when she tried to promote the government's agreement with Netflix.

She takes over from Marc Garneau, who is no longer in cabinet.

Public Services and Procurement Minister Anita Anand received a promotion in today's cabinet shuffle. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Canada is getting a new Environment and Climate Change minister just days ahead of the United Nations climate change conference in Glasgow (COP26). Long-time environmental activist Steven Guilbeault is taking on the role following his previous posting as Heritage minister.

The Quebec MP, who has worked with groups such as Equiterre and Greenpeace, will have a prominent role in cabinet as the Liberals attempt to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 40 to 45 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030.

His predecessor, Jonathan Wilkinson, takes over Natural Resources. 

Mélanie Joly received a promotion this morning, taking on a new role in. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)

As the country still grapples with the lingering effects of the pandemic, Jean-Yves Duclos takes over the health ministry. He's being replaced as president of the Treasury Board by Ottawa-area MP Mona Fortier.

Patty Hajdu, who took on the health ministry just months before the pandemic hit, becomes minister of Indigenous Services and minister responsible for the federal economic development agency for Northern Ontario.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, left, and Gov. Gen. Mary May Simon, right, pose with Steven Guilbeault, the new minister of Environment and Climate Change, during the cabinet swearing-in ceremony. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Hajdu will work on the Liberals' reconciliation agenda with Marc Miller, who slides over to Crown-Indigenous Relations. 

Their new appointments come amid renewed calls for justice for residential school survivors and for the federal government to compensate First Nations children. Ottawa has until Friday to decide whether it will appeal a decision by the Federal Court to uphold two Canadian Human Rights Tribunal orders requiring Ottawa to pay out billions of dollars to Indigenous children.

Former government house leader Pablo Rodríguez takes over as Heritage minister, keeping the portfolio in the hands of a Quebec MP. Former whip Mark Holland moves into a cabinet position, taking over Rodríguez's old job.

New portfolios

A number of portfolios have been created, broken up or renamed.

After years overseeing various Indigenous files, Carolyn Bennett moves to a new position as minister of Mental Health and Addictions and associate minister of health.

The veteran politician was recently forced to apologize publicly to Jody Wilson-Raybould after suggesting the Indigenous MP's expressions of concern about residential schools and Indigenous rights were actually a ploy to secure a generous MP's pension. Wilson-Raybould described the message as "racist & misogynist."

Former Public Safety minister Bill Blair becomes president of the Queen's Privy Council and takes on a new role as minister of Emergency Preparedness — a file that used to be housed under public safety.

Marco Mendicino takes over a slimmer Public Safety department.

Dominic LeBlanc stays on as minister of Intergovernmental Affairs but also takes on the infrastructure and communities files.

Trudeau made other changes to his team today:

  • Ahmed Hussen becomes minister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion.
  • Karina Gould becomes minister of Families, Children and Social Development.
  • Joyce Murray becomes the new minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard.
  • Mary Ng becomes minister of International Trade, Export Promotion, Small Business and Economic Development.
  • Seamus O'Regan becomes minister of Labour.
  • Ginette Petitpas Taylor gets a second chance in cabinet as minister of Official Languages and minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency.
  • Filomena Tassi becomes minister of Public Services and Procurement
  • Dan Vandal stays on as minister of Northern Affairs but also takes on responsibility for Prairies Economic Development Canada and the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency.

New faces

There will be some fresh faces around the cabinet table as well.

Former broadcaster and Toronto MP Marci Ien becomes the new minister for Women, Gender Equality and Youth.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, right, congratulates Marci Ien, minister for Women, Gender Equality and Youth. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Brampton West's Kamal Khera has been named minister of Seniors; the previous minister, Deb Schulte, was defeated in September's election.

Pascale St-Onge, elected in Brome—Missisquoi, has been appointed minister of Sport and minister responsible for Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions. She previously worked as a union leader in Quebec's cultural sector.

Alberta will get a seat at the table — Edmonton Centre MP Randy Boissonnault is the new minister of Tourism and associate minister of finance. He was first elected in 2015 but lost his seat in 2019, only to win it back last month by a narrow margin. He served previously as a special adviser to the prime minister on LGBTQ2 issues.

Nova Scotia MP Sean Fraser, who was first elected in 2015, finally gets a spot at the table as the new minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship.

Central Nova MP Sean Fraser also gets a spot at the table as the new minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship. (Robert Short/CBC)

Newfoundland and Labrador's Gudie Hutchings moves in as minister of Rural Economic Development.

Helena Jaczek, a former Ontario MPP and provincial health minister, becomes the minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario.

Returning ministers 

A few ministers are keeping their old jobs. Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Chrystia Freeland has agreed to remain in both roles and David Lametti stays as attorney general and minister of justice.

 Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Tuesday, Oct.26, 2021. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)

Transport Minister Omar Alghabra keeps his job, Marie Claude Bibeau remains at Agriculture and Agri-food, Dianne Lebouthillier stays at National Revenue and Lawrence MacAulay keeps Veterans Affairs.

Carla Qualtrough also remains minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion.

Francois Philippe Champagne stays on as minister as Innovation, Science and Industry.

Along with Garneau, Waterloo MP Bardish Chagger and Winnipeg Jim Carr were dropped from cabinet.

Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole was quick to criticize the new cabinet lineup, saying it's filled with "largely inexperienced and ideologically driven individuals."

"With inflation at a near twenty-year high, causing gasoline, grocery and housing prices to skyrocket, and businesses suffering from major supply chain interruptions, it is clear from today's appointments that the Trudeau government is not serious about addressing Canada's economic challenges," he said in a media statement.

"Today's changes to cabinet represent just another example of the prime minister continuing to reward ministers who have consistently demonstrated incompetence and a lack of accountability."

With files from David Cochrane and Nick Boisvert

  

O'Toole attacks Trudeau's 'inexperienced' cabinet as a threat to national unity

Conservative leader says Trudeau rewarding ministers who have 'demonstrated incompetence'

In a statement released as ministers were still being sworn in at Rideau Hall, O'Toole said Trudeau's cabinet picks are "yet another example" of his "record of style over substance."

"Today's changes to the cabinet represent just another example of the prime minister continuing to reward ministers who have consistently demonstrated incompetence and a lack of accountability," O'Toole said.

Before today's swearing-in ceremony, O'Toole called for Harjit Sajjan to be dumped as defence minister over his "track record of failure" on the sexual misconduct file in the Canadian Armed Forces. "Canada's Conservatives are calling on Justin Trudeau to finally do the right thing, and fire Minister Sajjan from cabinet," O'Toole said in a Monday statement.

Anita Anand and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Tuesday, Oct. 26, 2021. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

While Sajjan was removed from that high-profile post, the B.C. MP will stay in cabinet as the minister of International Development. Ontario MP Anita Anand — who served as Public Services and Procurement minister during the mad scramble to buy COVID-19 vaccines over the past 16 months — will replace Sajjan at defence. Anand is only the second woman in Canadian history to hold that job.

Mélanie Joly, was demoted from Heritage to serve as the minister of tourism in August 2018 after facing a torrent of criticism over her handling of the so-called "Netflix tax" and reforms to the broadcasting sector. She's now making a triumphant return to a prominent position with her appointment Tuesday as minister of Foreign Affairs.

While O'Toole described the new cabinet as "inexperienced," just nine of the 39 members in this cabinet are new ministers.

Only one person named to cabinet today — Pascale St-Onge, a former Quebec union leader who will serve as the minister of sport — was first elected in October's general election. Of the nine new members appointed today, Ginette Petitpas-Taylor served previously in cabinet as health minister between 2017 and 2019.

O'Toole's talk of a national unity threat appears to be a thinly veiled reference to the appointment of long-time Quebec climate activist Steven Guilbeault to the position of environment minister. In the past, the Conservatives said Guilbeault's very presence in the Liberal Party suggests Trudeau is hostile to the oil and gas industry, a business that sustains tens of thousands of jobs and pumps billions into government coffers.

Steven Guilbeault is the new environment minister. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Before entering electoral politics, Guilbeault co-founded Équiterre, a Quebec environmental organization, and served as the director of the Quebec chapter of Greenpeace for more than a decade.

While at Greenpeace, Guilbeault was arrested after climbing a 340-metre tower and unfurling a banner that read "Canada and Bush Climate Killers"— an act of civil disobedience meant to draw attention to inaction by Canada and the U.S. on the Kyoto Protocol climate agreement.

Later, Guilbeault emerged as an ardent opponent of pipeline development, including the Trans Mountain expansion project that is now being built by a Crown corporation.

Greenpeace celebrated Guilbeault's appointment Tuesday, calling him a leader who "knows the file."

"He knows the key players and he understands just how much is at stake," the group said in a media statement.

Trudeau previously defended his decision to run Guilbeault under the Liberal banner, saying in 2019 that the party welcomes "a broad range of views on a lot of different issues."

Construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline is well underway, with more than 9,400 people actively working on the project in hundreds of communities across B.C and Alberta.

O'Toole said another pressing concern for the Conservative Party is the country's economic recovery, suggesting Trudeau's new cabinet is ill-equipped to deal with ongoing COVID-related issues.

"With inflation at a near twenty-year high, causing gasoline, grocery and housing prices to skyrocket, and businesses suffering from major supply chain interruptions, it is clear from today's appointments that the Trudeau government is not serious about addressing Canada's economic challenges," he said.

"Canadians will only get higher prices, higher taxes, and smaller paycheques under this government's economic plan. What they deserve are solutions to our economic challenges, not more risky and unproven economic schemes."

At a press conference on Parliament Hill, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh also criticized the new cabinet. He took issue with the appointment of Carolyn Bennett, the outgoing Crown-Indigenous relations minister, and Marc Miller — who, until today, served as the Indigenous Services minister — to new cabinet positions.

Miller will replace Bennett at Crown-Indigenous Relations, the portfolio that deals with land claims and ongoing reconciliation efforts. Bennett, who has served in an Indigenous-related portfolio since the Liberal government was first elected in 2015, will now be the minister for mental health and addictions.

WATCH: Singh reacts to appointment of Canada's new defence minister

Singh reacts to appointment of Canada's new defence minister

2 days ago
2:07
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh is asked what he expects from newly appointed Defence Minister Anita Anand. 2:07

No longer health minister, Patty Hajdu will take over for Miller at Indigenous Services, a department that is primarily focused on the delivery of government programs to First Nations, Metis and Inuit communities.

The NDP has consistently criticized the government's move under Bennett and Miller to launch an application for a judicial review of a landmark human rights tribunal compensation order for First Nations children.

The federal government has argued that the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal overreached and was wrong to order Ottawa to pay $40,000 to each child affected by the on-reserve child welfare system since 2006.

Singh calls for 'concrete actions'

"If Justin Trudeau had a problem with the approach taken by the previous ministers, then they probably wouldn't be in cabinet. But they're still in cabinet, so that means they were OK with their approach. That's a problem," Singh said. "If someone's done a bad job, they shouldn't be there anymore."

Singh said his priorities for this next session of Parliament are implementing paid sick leave, boosting funds for health care, a national child care regime and a pharmacare plan. He said he worries this new cabinet will fail to deliver.

"The cabinet changes don't change who's at the top of this and a lot of these things have been around for the past six years since Mr. Trudeau's been in power and those changes haven't happened," he said.

"Changing the minister that deals with Indigenous Services doesn't change that they've got a decision to make in a couple days about whether they're going to appeal or fight Indigenous kids in court. Those are the things we want to see — concrete actions, not just who's in the different roles."

National Indigenous leaders, meanwhile, said they're willing to work with Miller to deliver results.

In a media statement, Assembly of First Nations National Chief RoseAnne Archibald congratulated the new ministers and said she "look[s] forward to continuing the work we've done" with Miller on reconciliation.

"My hope is that these individuals, and all ministers in cabinet, will work alongside First Nations to find a healing path forward in 2022 and beyond," Archibald said.

The Native Women's Association of Canada (NWAC) said it was "pleased to learn" that Hajdu would assume her new role and that Miller would still be involved in the Indigenous file after the cabinet overhaul.

"All of these new ministers have shown compassion in their previous roles and in their work at the federal level, and we are hopeful that spirit will continue as they take on their new jobs," Lorraine Whitman, the president of NWAC, said in a statement. "These appointments are good steps forward for reconciliation."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

John Paul Tasker

Parliamentary Bureau

J.P. Tasker is a senior writer in the CBC's parliamentary bureau in Ottawa. He can be reached at john.tasker@cbc.ca.


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/alberta-federal-cabinet-parliament-environment-1.6225615 

 

Kenney says longtime activist's appointment as environment minister sends 'very problematic' message

Longtime environmental activist Steven Guilbeault gets prominent role in Trudeau's cabinet

Longtime environmental activist and former heritage minister Steven Guilbeault will take on the prominent role in cabinet as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Liberals attempt to slash greenhouse gas emissions by 40 to 45 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030.

The Quebec MP once worked as a senior member of Greenpeace and was arrested in 2001 for scaling Toronto's CN Tower in an attempt to draw attention to climate change.

WATCH | Steven Guilbeault scaled CN Tower as Greenpeace activist in 2001:

Taking Greenpeace's message to the skies

20 years ago
3:14
Greenpeace scales Toronto's CN Tower in protest over the Kyoto Protocol. 3:14

Guilbeault has vocally opposed pipelines and also co-founded the environmental non-profit group Équiterre, which was cited as a participant in "anti-Alberta energy campaigns" in the United Conservative Party's controversial Allan Report. Guilbeault himself was mentioned in the report by name six times.

On Tuesday, Kenney expressed concern over his appointment as minister of environment and climate change. 

"I certainly hope that [Guilbeault] … will quickly demonstrate to Alberta, and other resource-producing provinces, a desire to work together constructively on practical solutions that don't end up killing hundreds of thousands of jobs," Kenney said.

"But his own personal background and track record on these issues suggest somebody who is more of an absolutist than a pragmatist when it comes to finding solutions."

'Kenney's head is gonna explode'

Duane Bratt, a political scientist with Mount Royal University in Calgary, put it more bluntly.

"Kenney's head is gonna explode," he said. "This is really a finger in the eye to everything that Kenney has done."

According to Bratt, Guilbeault, who was a star recruit for the federal Liberals in 2019, desperately wanted to be the environment minister.

Justin Trudeau officially introduced Steven Guilbeault as the Liberal Party of Canada's candidate in the Montreal riding of Laurier-Sainte-Marie. (Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press)

"I think Trudeau would have put him in that spot in 2019, except for the shellacking they took out in the Prairies," Bratt said.

Jonathan Wilkinson had the job but was shuffled on Tuesday to become minister of natural resources, which makes him another notable appointment for Alberta.

Kenney said Tuesday that Wilkinson's relationship with Alberta had been "constructive" during his tenure as environment minister.

"I think [he] understood that Alberta is a good faith partner in addressing the climate challenge, and I think broadly agreed with our effort," the premier said. 

Meanwhile, Bratt says Guilbeault could have his work cut out for him.

"If the job is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, I think he could very well be effective. If it's about the politics around that, that's going to be a lot tougher for this man."

If the job is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, I think he could very well be effective. If it's about the politics around that, that's going to be a lot tougher for this man.​​​​​​
- Duane Bratt, political scientist with Mount Royal University

But when Guilbeault was running for the federal Liberals in 2019, the high-profile environmentalist said he was willing to be pragmatic about pipelines in the pursuit of better environment policy and explained why he felt comfortable running for the party, despite seeing the issue differently.

"I disagree with the pipeline," he told CBC News at the time about the Trans Mountain pipeline, which the Liberal government purchased in 2018. It approved its expansion the following year.

"But when I look at everything that the Liberal government has done over the past four years, in terms of fighting climate change, there's so much for me to rally around that, despite this point of disagreement, I've decided to go ahead."

UCP has tried to work with Ottawa, Kenney says

Kenney said Tuesday that since elected in 2019, the UCP has attempted to find a way forward with the federal government and tried to address the "urgent need" to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while still growing Alberta's economy and responsibly developing its resources.

"Despite our best efforts, we have constantly been surprised by ever-more ambitious federal targets and prejudicial policies, which seem to be directed at impeding Alberta's natural resource development, jobs and our economy," Kenney said.

But Bratt pointed out that Kenney's so-called Fight-Back Strategy has likely not endeared his government to anyone in Ottawa, nor has it done him many favours back in Alberta.

"The carbon tax, the War Room, the Allan Inquiry, buying [the Keystone XL pipeline] — they've all been self-punches to the face," Bratt said.

"I don't think Trudeau thinks he's got a lot of leverage right now," said Bratt.

He pointed to both the "massive unpopularity of the Kenney government" and the seats the Liberals managed to win in Alberta in the federal election.

Appointment comes days before UN climate conference 

Meanwhile, Alberta's energy industry seemed to be taking the appointment in stride.

The Canadian Association of Energy Contractors (CAEC), the Canadian Energy Pipeline Association (CEPA) and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) said they would continue working with the federal government. 

Tim McMillan, the president and CEO of CAPP, said it was incredibly important that industry, along with Guilbeault and Wilkinson, find common ground.

"Canadian producers share the aspiration of Canadians to find realistic and workable solutions to the challenge of climate change," he said. 

Bratt said environmental groups will likely be thrilled to see Guilbeault in the role.

The announcement comes just days ahead of the United Nations climate change conference in Glasgow.

"[Trudeau is] gonna walk in with someone who got arrested and convicted over demonstrations to defend the environment," Bratt said. "That's pretty strong cred."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Hannah Kost

Online Journalist/Associate Producer

Hannah Kost is an award-winning journalist from Calgary, Alta. She joined the CBC in 2019 as an online journalist and associate producer.

With files from Colleen Underwood, Julia Wong and Catharine Tunney

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/federal-cabinet-list-2021-1.6225231 

 

Who's who in Justin Trudeau's 2021 cabinet

Chrystia Freeland : Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Chrystia Freeland, second from right, and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Tuesday. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Omar Alghabra: Minister of Transport

 

Omar Alghabra arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Anita Anand: Minister of National Defence

 

Anita Anand and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Tuesday, Oct.26, 2021. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Carolyn Bennett: Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health


Carolyn Bennett and a family member arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Marie-Claude Bibeau: Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food

Marie-Claude Bibeau arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Bill Blair: President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Emergency Preparedness

Bill Blair arrives at a cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Randy Boissonnault: Minister of Tourism and Associate Minister of Finance

Randy Boissonnault arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

François-Philippe Champagne: Minister of Innovation, Science and Commerce

Francois-Philippe Champagne arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Jean-Yves Duclos : Minister of Health

Jean-Yves Duclos and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Mona Fortier: President of the Treasury Board

Mona Fortier arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Tuesday, Oct.26, 2021. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Sean Fraser: Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Sean Fraser and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Karina Gould: Minister of Families, Children and Social Development 

Karina Gould arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Steven Guilbeault: Minister of Environment and Climate Change

Steven Guilbeault, centre, and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Patty Hajdu: Minister of Indigenous Services and minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Northern Ontario

Patty Hajdu and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Mark Holland: Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mark Holland and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Tuesday, Oct.26, 2021. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Ahmed Hussen: Minister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion

Ahmed Hussen arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Gudie Hutchings: Minister of Rural and Economic Development

Gudie Hutchings arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Marci Ien: Minister for Women, Gender Equality and Youth



Marci Ien and her family arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Helena Jaczek: Minister responsible for the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario

Helena Jaczek arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Mélanie Joly: Minister of Foreign Affairs

 

Melanie Joly and a family member arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Kamal Khera: Minister of Seniors

Kamal Khera (right) arrives for a cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

David Lametti: Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada

David Lametti (left) arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Dominic LeBlanc: Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs, Infrastructure and Communities

Dominic LeBlanc arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Diane Lebouthillier: Minister of National Revenue

Diane Lebouthillier arrives at a cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Lawrence MacAulay: Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence

Lawrence MacAulay and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Marco Mendicino: Minister of Public Safety

 

Marco Mendicino and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Marc Miller: Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations 

Marc Miller arrives with family members at a cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Joyce Murray: Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard

Joyce Murray (right) arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Mary Ng: Minister of International Trade, Export Promotion, Small Business and Economic Development

Minister of Small Business, Export Promotion and International Trade Mary Ng and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Tuesday, Oct.26, 2021. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Seamus O'Regan: Minister of Labour

Seamus O'Regan (right) arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Ginette Petitpas Taylor: Minister of Official Languages and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

 

Ginette Petitpas Taylor arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Carla Qualtrough: Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Disability Inclusion

Carla Qualtrough arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Pablo Rodriguez: Minister of Canadian Heritage and Quebec Lieutenant

 

Pablo Rodriguez and family members arrive for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Harjit Sajjan: Minister of International Development and Minister responsible for the Pacific Economic Development Agency of Canada

Harjit Sajjan and family members arrive at a cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Pascale St-Onge: Minister of Sport and Minister responsible for the Economic Development Agency of Canada for Quebec

Pascale St-Onge (Daniel Coulombe/Radio-Canada)

Filomena Tassi: Minister of Public Services and Procurement

 

Filomena Tassi (centre) arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall in Ottawa, Tuesday, Oct.26, 2021. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Dan Vandal: Minister of Northern Affairs; Minister responsible for Prairies Economic Development Canada, and minister responsible for the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency

Dan Vandal arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

Jonathan Wilkinson: Minister of Natural Resources

Jonathan Wilkinson arrives for the cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Rideau Hall. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

 

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 13:54:55 -0300
Subject: YO Higgy I wonder if your lawyer buddy Mr Letson told his
political partner Mel about this email yet
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, abruce.lji@gmail.com,
jake@porthawkesburyreporter.com, info@voteseanfraser.ca

http://voteseanfraser.ca/
(902) 695-3505
Send Message
info@voteseanfraser.ca


 

---------- Original message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 01:25:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Higgy I wonder if your lawyer buddy Mr
Letson or anyone else recalls this email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 21:21:37 -0400
Subject: YO Higgy I wonder if your lawyer buddy Mr Letson or anyone
else recalls this email
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, peter.loewen@utoronto.ca,
jeveritt@unb.ca, "jp.lewis"<jp.lewis@unb.ca>, ddesserud
<ddesserud@upei.ca>, "Kim.Poffenroth"<Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>,
"Paul.Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>,
thomas.oneil@mcinnescooper.com
, "len.hoyt"
<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
mletson@lawsoncreamer.com, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 14:48:37 -0400
Subject: Re: Yo Gerry Lowe so much for political experts EH?
To: peter.loewen@utoronto.ca, "gerry.lowe"<gerry.lowe@gnb.ca>,
mletson@lawsoncreamer.com, jeveritt@unb.ca, "jp.lewis"
<jp.lewis@unb.ca>, ddesserud <ddesserud@upei.ca>, "Kim.Poffenroth"
<Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>, "Paul.Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>,
thomas.oneil@mcinnescooper.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, "Connell.Smith"
<Connell.Smith@cbc.ca>

'Astonishingly low' chance of PC win if rejected ballots distributed
fairly, court told

U of T professor Peter Loewen proposes statistical formulas for
distributing rejected ballots
Connell Smith · CBC News · Posted: Jun 27, 2019 6:00 AM AT

On 6/28/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:58:02 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I
>> feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest
>> you recall this email?
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for contacting the office of Sean Fraser, Member of
>> Parliament for Central Nova.
>>
>> This is to assure you that your email has arrived, and that we
>> appreciate hearing from you.
>>
>> If your matter is urgent, please contact our New Glasgow constituency
>> office toll-free at 1-844-641-5886 between the hours of 8:30-4:30pm,
>> and we will do our best to resolve your issue, or otherwise assist
>> you.
>>
>> Thank you and have a great day!
>>
>> New Glasgow
>> 2A-115 MacLean Street B2H 4M5
>> Toll-free 1-844-641-5886
>> 902-752-0226
>>
>> Antigonish
>> 200-155 Main Street B2G 2B6
>> 902-867-2919
>>
>> Ottawa
>> 110 Confederation Building K1A 0A6
>> 613-992-6022
>>
>> Facebook:
>> facebook.com/SeanFraserMP<https://www.facebook.com/SeanFraserMP/photos/a.1628138987467042.1073741829.1627521694195438/2066666113614325/?type=3&theater>
>> Twitter: @SeanFraserMP<https://twitter.com/SeanFraserMP>
>> Instagram: SeanFraserMP<https://www.instagram.com/seanfrasermp/?hl=en>
>> www.seanfrasermp.ca
>>
>> Toll free: 1-844-641-5886
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 16:59:16 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court Court File No. T-1557-15 I
>> feel compelled to ask does Andy Scheer or Seamus O'Regan or the rest
>> you recall this email?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:29 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can
>> never deny that I tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and
>> his latest client Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>> Merci!
>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>> S?curit? publique Canada
>> *********
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>> Thank you!
>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>> Public Safety Canada
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:40 +0000
>> Subject: Autoreply
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for contacting my parliamentary office.  This automated
>> response is to assure you that your message has been received and will
>> be reviewed as soon as possible, noting that constituents of Timmins -
>> James Bay will be given priority.  Due to the high volume of
>> correspondence received, I am not able to respond personally to every
>> inquiry.  In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded items will not
>> receive a response.
>>
>> If you have submitted a request for assistance please insure you have
>> included your full name, your mailing address and daytime telephone
>> number.   To reach my community offices directly, please contact:
>>
>> Timmins  1-866-935-6464
>>
>> Kirkland Lake  1-866-504-2747
>>
>> Cochrane  1-705-465-1315
>>
>> Thank you kindly,
>>
>> Charlie Angus
>>
>> Member of Parliament for Timmins - James Bay
>>
>> Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec mon bureau parlementaire. La
>> présente réponse automatique vous est envoyée pour vous informer que
>> votre message a été reçu et qu'il sera examiné le plus rapidement
>> possible,  la priorité étant accordée aux électeurs de Timmins - Baie
>> James.  En raison du volume élevé de correspondance reçue, je ne peux
>> répondre personnellement à chaque demande. Dans la plupart des cas,
>> les lettres anonymes, copies conformes et pièces transmises resteront
>> sans réponse.
>>
>> Si vous présentez une demande d'aide, n'oubliez pas d'indiquer votre
>> nom au complet, votre adresse postale et votre numéro de téléphone
>> (jour).  Pour joindre directement mes bureaux locaux, veuillez
>> composer :
>>
>>
>> Timmins  1-866-935-6464
>>
>> Kirkland Lake  1-866-504-2747
>>
>> Cochrane  1-705-465-1315
>>
>>
>> Cordiales salutations,
>>
>> Charlie Angus
>>
>> Député de Timmins - Baie James
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 17:50:40 +0000
>> Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
>> message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
>> and questions from constituents.
>>
>> I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email)
>> than the average MP. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis,
>> however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not
>> be able to respond personally to each one.
>>
>> My constituents in Saanich-Gulf Islands are my highest priority. If
>> you are a constituent, please email
>> elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca<
mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca>. To
>> help me serve you better, please ensure that your email includes your
>> full name and street address with your postal code.
>>
>>
>> For meeting requests and invitations, please email
>> requests@greenparty.carequests
@greenparty.ca
>>>.
>>
>> Thank you once again for contacting me.
>>
>>
>>
>> Elizabeth May, O.C.
>>
>> Member of Parliament
>>
>> Saanich - Gulf Islands
>>
>> Leader of the Green Party of Canada
>>
>> --
>>
>> Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec moi. La présente réponse vous
>> confirme que votre message a été reçu. Les questions et les
>> commentaires des électeurs sont toujours les bienvenus.
>>
>> Je reçois une correspondance (postale et électronique) beaucoup plus
>> abondante que le député type. Tous les messages électroniques sont lus
>> régulièrement, mais, en raison de l'abondance des courriels reçus à
>> mon bureau, il se peut que je ne sois pas en mesure de répondre
>> personnellement à chacun d'entre eux.
>>
>> Mes électeurs de Saanich-Gulf Islands passent en premier. Si vous êtes
>> un électeur, veuillez écrire à
>> elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca<
mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca>.
>> Pour m'aider à mieux vous servir, veillez à ce que votre courriel
>> comporte votre nom complet, votre adresse municipale et votre code
>> postal.
>>
>> Pour les demandes de rencontre et les invitations, veuillez écrire à
>> requests@greenparty.carequests
@greenparty.ca>.
>>
>> Je vous remercie encore d'avoir communiqué avec moi.
>>
>>
>> Elizabeth May, O.C.
>>
>> Députée à la Chambre des communes
>>
>> Saanich-Gulf Islands
>>
>> Chef du Parti vert du Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:50:13 -0400
>> Subject: The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell can never deny that I
>> tried to inform him of what the RCMP, the CBC and his latest client
>> Jody Wilson-Raybould knows Correct Me Butts?
>> To: TCromwell@blg.com, catharine.tunney@cbc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
>> JagmeetForBurnaby@ndp.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
>> charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca,
>> Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca, tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca,
>> Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
>> jp.lewis@unb.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 10:07:59 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE:: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HMQ - COURT FILE
>> NO.: A-48-16 , Attn Lorri Warner have you and your bosses talked the
>> RCMP and the FBI YET???
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>
>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>> Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>
>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>
>>
>>
>> Merci
>>
>>
>> The Honourable Thomas Albert Cromwell C.C.
>> Senior Counsel
>>
>>     Phone: 604.632.3460
>>     Fax: 604.662.5327
>>     TCromwell@blg.com
>>
>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/wilson-rayboul-snc-lavalin-1.5015755
>>
>> Jody Wilson-Raybould resigns from cabinet after SNC-Lavalin allegations
>>
>> Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Feb 12, 2019 11:39 AM ET
>>
>> "Wilson-Raybould, who plans to stay on as MP for Vancouver-Granville,
>> has been quiet since the Globe and Mail story broke, saying she can't
>> comment because she's bound by solicitor-client privilege.
>>
>> In her resignation letter, she said she has retained the services of
>> lawyer Thomas Cromwell, a former justice of the Supreme Court of
>> Canada, to advise her on "topics that I am legally permitted to
>> discuss on this matter."
>>
>> In an email to CBC News, Cromwell said he would not be making any
>> statements or doing any interviews."
>>
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/02/ndp-leader-jagmeet-singh-claims-victory.html
>>
>>
>> Tuesday, 26 February 2019
>>
>> NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh claims victory in Burnaby South byelection
>>
>>
>>
>>  David Amos
>> Methinks it should be fairly obvious as to why the lawyer Melanie Joly
>> who is our current Minister of Tourism, Official Languages and La
>> Francophonie is smiling N'esy Pas?
>>
>> https://rbendayan.liberal.ca/en/
>>
>> "Rachel built a successful legal practice at Norton Rose Fulbright in
>> the field of litigation and international arbitration while also
>> teaching at the Faculty of Law of the Université de Montréal. She then
>> served as Chief of Staff to the federal Minister of Small Business and
>> Tourism, where she played a key role in developing the Liberal
>> government’s women’s entrepreneurship strategy"
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:21:06 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Maxime Bernier Lets see if there is an
>> ethical politcal soul in York-Simcoe before the 12th
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> <Premier@ontario.ca>
>> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:21:05 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Maxime Bernier Lets see if there is an
>> ethical politcal soul in York-Simcoe before the 12th
>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______­­
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Singh - QP, Jagmeet"<JSingh-QP@ndp.on.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:39:35 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
>> upcoming hearing on May 24th I called a lot of your people before High
>> Noon today Correct Ralph Goodale and Deputy Minister Malcolm Brown?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>> For immediate assistance please contact our Brampton office at
>> 905-799-3939 or jsingh-co@ndp.on.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
>> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
>> of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
>> Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>> ______________________________
__
>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
>> Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
>> signature under applicable law.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
>> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
>> did she take all four copies?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
>> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
>> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>
>>>
>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>>  Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I.                    Introduction
>>
>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III.               Issue
>>
>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV.              Analysis
>>
>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>
>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V.                 Conclusion
>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 00:00:38 -0400
Subject: EUB 486 Irving bullshit and Kent Group Ltd.
To: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

ACTING CHAIRPERSON: Okay. Thank you. So that being considered, so
those minimum filing requirements that are included in the letter of
January the 19th 2021 by Mr. Letson to the chief clerk will be, at a
minimum, the information that needs to be provided to the chief clerk
prior to the first round of IRs.
Just one comment, Mr. Hoyt, the Board will be retaining an independent
expert which will be Mr. Jason Parent from the Kent Group. And I also
understand that Mr. Parent may have some comment regarding on the
proposed MFR. So if that is an issue, we will be informing the
applicant if there is any other requirements of the minimal filing
requirements once he starts his process of reviewing the information.

Kent Group Ltd.
367 Princess Ave.
London, Ontario
N6B 2A7

Jason.Parent@kalibrate.com
519-672-7000 x 112

Jason Parent is the Managing Director at Kent Group Ltd. His
responsibilities encompass a range of project management roles, as
well as the analysis and reporting of data for our clients. Mr.
Parent’s functional specialties include the areas of regulatory
analysis, petroleum market and price/ margin analysis, forecasting and
performance benchmarking.

Mr. Parent has seventeen years experience in providing consulting and
performance data analysis in the petroleum industry. This industry
expertise is supported by a degree in Business Administration, having
graduated with distinction. Jason plays a vital role in the management
of relationships with our extensive client base, meeting their needs
through a diverse range of services including consulting and custom
project work, development of custom data delivery and reporting, as
well as assisting clients in the development of specific project needs
and deliverables.



Media release January 7, 2021
The New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board has received an
application from Irving Oil requesting an interim increase to the
wholesale margins for motor fuels and furnace oil of $0.035/litre, as
well as a final order increasing the wholesale margin for motor fuels
from $0.0651/litre to $0.1054/litre and an increase to the wholesale
margin for furnace oil from $0.055/litre to $0.0963/litre.
The Board has set a pre-hearing conference for Monday, January 25 at
9:30 a.m. for the Board to consider the following:
a. Minimum Filing Requirements;
b. The specific process that will be used by the Board to consider
this application;
c. An appropriate filing schedule;
d. Intervenor Requests;
e. Irving Oil’s request for an interim order under section 40 of the
EUB Act, including any written or oral submission of approved
Intervenors; and,
f. Any other relevant issue.
The pre-hearing conference will be held via the Zoom Web Conference
platform. Interested parties can visit the Board’s website at
www.nbeub.ca for details on how to request to intervene.
The application and related documents can be viewed at www.nbeub.ca by
searching Matter number 486.
The Board’s proceedings are open the general public to attend and
observe, and as such, the Board invites any person or organization
interested in observing the proceedings to contact the Board at
general@nbeub.ca to obtain the sign-in information for any of the
upcoming hearings.
For more information contact:
Kathleen Mitchell
506-658-2504

VIA EMAIL
January 19, 2021
Kathleen Mitchell, Chief Clerk
New Brunswick Energy & Utilities Board
PO Box 5001
Saint John, NB E2L 4Y9
Dear Ms. Mitchell:
Re: An Application by Irving Oil Marketing G.P. and Irving Oil
Commercial G.P. (Matter 486), Our File No. 6994-009
Further to the Order of the Energy and Utilities Board (Board) in this
Matter dated January 8, 2021, wherein it indicated that it will
consider, inter alia, minimum filing requirements for this Matter, we
are writing to advise of the Board staff’s recommendations on that
point. To assist in the review of the application, Board staff
recommends the adoption of the following minimum filing requirements:
1) The information related to the factors the Board must consider as
set out at subsection 9(1) of NB Regulation 2006-41:
a. Cost of transporting fuel from New York Harbor
b. Volumes of sales
c. Storage Costs
d. Inventory turnover rates
e. Applicable levies and insurance costs
2) The underlying calculations for the tables found at page 1 of
Appendix A of Exhibit IO 1.02
3) All supporting documentation for the following information
contained on page 2 of Appendix A
a. Terminal fees,
b. Transportation and Port Fees,
c. Working Capital Management and Overhead,
d. Federal Compliance Costs
4) Please provide the total sales

In addition, we advise that Board staff expect to retain an
independent expert to review the application and file evidence in
Matter 486. The expert may have additional recommendations for minimum
filing requirements, and if so, those recommendations will be provided
to all parties prior to the Pre-hearing Conference scheduled for
January 25th, 2021.
We trust you will find this in order.
Yours very truly,
LAWSON CREAMER
Matthew R. Letson (P.C.*), Partner
Direct: (506) 633-3533
mletson@lawsoncreamer.com


Darren Gillis
Irving Oil
10 King Square South
Saint John, NB E2L 0G3
Telephone: (506) 647-4162
Email: darren.gillis@irvingoil.com

Scholten's Grocery
90 Hubbard Road
Fredericton NB E3B 6B4

Chris.Scholten@Scholtens.ca
(506) 459-4643

Jerry.Scholten@Scholtens.ca
(506) 457-0566


Hafsah Mohammad, Organizational Representative
Grassroots NB
114 Somerset Drive
Moncton, NB E1A 3T9
(587) 597 - 2953
nb.grassroots@gmail.com


Jennifer Bueno
Solidarité Fredericton Solidarity Volunteer
Solidarité Fredericton Solidarity
15-215 Main Street, Fredericton, NB, E3A 1E1
(506) 962-0521
jennifer.bueno@unb.ca
Simon Ouellette
Solidarité Fredericton Solidarity
4-122 Aberdeen Street, Fredericton, NB E3R 1R5
(506) 229-6038
ouellette.acadie@gmail.com


Lynaya Astephe, Chair
Leap4wards
1877 Red Head Rd,
Saint John, NB E2P 1J5
[506-653-7959
leap4wards@gmail.com

Aditya Rao, Human Rights Representative
Canadian Union of Public Employees
91 Woodside Lane
Fredericton, NB E3C 0C5
(506) 247-0137
arao@cupe.ca


Abram Lutes,
Provincial Coordinator
New Brunswick Common Front for Social Justice
236 St George St, Suite 412
Moncton, NB E1C 1W1
506-855-8977
frontnb@bellaliant.net






https://www.facebook.com/MerylSartyPPCNBSW/about/

(506) 660-0028

Contact. 506-262-3353 meryl.sarty@gmail.com ...

travis-ppc.nbsw@protonmail.com
,

Letters

Mary Milander
Saint John

Denis Y. Boulet

Brent Theriault

Sunny Corner Enterprises Inc
Eric Lloyd President
259 Dalton Ave.
Miramichi, NB
E1V 3C4
Tel: (506) 622-5600
info@sunnycorner.ca

Lorneville Mechanical Contractors Ltd.
75 Stinson Drive
Saint John, NB E2M 7E3
Jim Brewer President
Todd Bethune, CFO
Styve Dumouchel, CEO
(506) 635-8090

New Brunswick Building Trades Council
Jean-Marc Ringuette, President
26 Kiwanis Court
Saint John, NB  E2K 4L2
Phone: (506) 635-1221
jeanmarc@ibew502.ca

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-oil-energy-board-margins-1.5886011

Irving Oil supporters and skeptics lining up on opposite sides of
company price hike request

Energy and Utilities Board holds first hearing into requested
wholesale margin increases today
Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Jan 25, 2021 7:26 AM AT

An initial hearing into Irving Oil's request for increases in
petroleum wholesale prices begins today in front of the New Brunswick
Energy and Utilities Board with supporters raising the stark prospect
of the company shutting down if it does not get what it is asking for
and skeptics warning the board against being manipulated.

"We must be cautiously aware that no business is too big to fail,"
read one letter on the issue received and posted publicly last week by
the EUB.

"They are playing the Board,"  read another about the company's application.

New Brunswick adopted petroleum price regulation in 2006 and put the
Energy and Utilities Board in place to oversee it.  Currently
wholesalers are allowed to add 6.51 cents per litre to the price of
motor fuels they handle (gasoline and diesel) and 5.5 cents per litre
to furnace oil.

Irving Oil is applying for a 62.8 per cent (4.09 cent per litre)
increase in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels and a 54.9
per cent (3.02 cent per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.
New Brunswick's Energy and Utilities Board has scheduled a full
hearing into Irving Oil's request for wholesale petroleum price
increases for March 30. It will hear arguments Monday for and against
an emergency interim increase. (Robert Jones/CBC News)

The increases are substantially more than the 11 per cent growth in
inflation that has occurred since the margins last changed in March
2013, but the company says fundamental changes in the oil industry and
a sudden collapse in demand for petroleum products caused by the
COVID-19 pandemic have rendered those old amounts obsolete.

"Petroleum pricing regulations in New Brunswick were created 15 years
ago," Darren Gillis, Irving Oil chief marketing officer, said in an
affidavit supporting the application. "They did not contemplate the
challenges of the last several years and were not designed to react to
a global pandemic."

If granted in full, the increases would apply to all New Brunswick
wholesalers and would cost consumers about $60 million per year in
higher retail prices.

The Energy and Utilities Board has tentatively scheduled a full
hearing into the matter for the end of March, but in its application
Irving Oil said its situation is dire and it cannot wait that long for
relief.
Irving Oil's Darren Gillis is heading the company's effort to have the
Energy and Utilities Board approve $60 million in increased petroleum
margins for New Brunswick wholesalers. (Irving Oil)

Instead it is asking for 85 per cent of the requested increase on
motor fuels (3.5 cents) and 99 per cent of the increase on furnace oil
(3.0 cents) to be granted immediately pending the outcome of the full
hearing next spring.

"The entire supply chain in under pressure and at risk," Gillis said
in the application. "COVID-19 has exacerbated challenges for the
industry and urgent action is required."

That tone has alarmed supporters of Irving Oil who fear the company is
in trouble. Last week, the company  announced layoffs at its Saint
John refinery and worried suppliers have been mobilizing to urge the
EUB to grant its request in full.

Eric Lloyd is president of Sunny Corner Enterprises Inc., an
industrial construction firm in Miramichi that does business with
Irving Oil.

Lloyd wrote to the EUB to say it "must take action to understand the
economic forces that are stressing a very important contributor to our
economy," and warned it is not "too big to fail" in asking its request
be granted.
Hafsah Mohammad is with the Moncton social justice and climate action
group Grassroots NB, one of several groups registered to oppose Irving
Oil's application. (Tori Weldon/CBC News)

Another Irving supplier, Lorneville Mechanical Contractors Ltd. in
Saint John, also sent a letter expressing concern about the company's
financial health.

"We understand that Irving Oil has identified New Brunswick's highly
regulated fuel pricing system as a challenge to its ability to operate
reliably and sustainably," wrote Lorneville's president Jim Brewer, in
endorsing immediate increases.

Local building trade unions warned the viability of the refinery
itself could hinge on the EUB's decision.

"It would be devastating to lose this asset," wrote union president
Jean-Marc Ringuette in his letter supporting Irving Oil's request.

But others are skeptical.

A number of anti-poverty, union and social justice organizations have
signed up to oppose Irving Oil's application and a clutch of private
citizens, like Saint John resident Mary Milander, also sent letters
opposing  the increase.

"I believe that that the people of Saint John and the whole province
have suffered financially much more than the oil industry during the
pandemic," Milander wrote to the board.
Natural Resources and Energy Development Minster Mike Holland stoked
early controversy about Irving Oil's request by writing a letter to
the Energy and Utilities Board telling it the application should be
dealt with quickly. (Radio-Canada)

Although yet to start, the hearing has already been highly
controversial following news last week that New Brunswick Natural
Resources Minister Mike Holland sent his own letter to the EUB
expressing concerns about Irving Oil's ability to supply products at
current prices.

That led to criticism from all three opposition parties and a call for
Holland to resign from Green Party Leader David Coon. Premier Blaine
Higgs defended Holland's intervention.

The EUB has granted interim relief to applicants in other cases
before, but normally on the condition money collected from consumers
be returned if the increases are later found to be unjustified.

A complicating factor in Irving Oil's application for immediate relief
is that Gillis has acknowledged that other than home heating oil
sales, returning money to customers will not be possible.

"In the unlikely case the permanent increase for motor fuels is lower
than the interim increase, Irving Oil cannot effectively and fairly
rebate the difference," he said.



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-oil-wholesale-petroleum-price-1.5887093


Irving Oil request for 'urgent' wholesale price hike stalls over
redacted evidence

Energy and Utilities Board adjourns to allow groups opposing price
increase to argue for access to evidence
Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Jan 25, 2021 5:58 PM AT

Irving Oil Ltd. is applying for a 62.8 per cent (4.09 cent per litre)
increase in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels and a 54.9
per cent (3.02 cent per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.
  (Devaan Ingraham/Reuters )

Irving Oil's attempt to win immediate wholesale petroleum price
increases from the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board stalled
quickly Monday over objections from a variety of community
organizations that too much of the application is based on secret
material.

"The amount of information that is redacted in these documents makes
it very difficult for our organization to meaningfully participate,"
said Abram Lutes with the New Brunswick Common Front for Social
Justice

"It limits our ability to participate meaningfully and to advocate on
behalf of low income workers and people in poverty."

Several other groups expressed similar concerns and the EUB's acting
Chair Francois Beaulieu scheduled a hearing Friday morning to deal
with the objections. That forced a delay in Irving Oil's request for
immediate increases in wholesale petroleum margins at least until next
week.
Francois Beaulieu, acting chair of the Energy and Utilities Board,
scheduled a hearing Friday morning to deal with objections to Irving
Oil's requests. (Graham Thompson/CBC)

"The board will adjourn and we'll await the interveners to file their
objections," said Beaulieu.

Until recently, Irving Oil has shown little outward concern about
petroleum wholesale margins in New Brunswick. Since 2016, it twice
declined to participate in scheduled reviews of the issue by the
board, including the latest one launched in 2019.
COVID-19 has affected business

But the company says the COVID-19 pandemic has hit its business hard,
and it now requires immediate changes.

In prepared remarks for the EUB on Monday that he was ultimately
unable to deliver before proceedings adjourned Irving Oil marketing
president Darren Gillis planned to outline the company's hardships

"We've reduced spending across the company, cancelled projects, and
unfortunately reduced our employee and contractor workforce," said the
prepared remarks.

"Significant sales declines (Jet Fuel, Marine Fuel and Transportation
Fuel) and higher costs are having a serious impact on the entire
supply chain. No one, no company is insulated from the impacts of the
pandemic, including Irving Oil."
Company asks for substantial increases

The company is applying for a 62.8 per cent (4.09 cent per litre)
increase in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels and a 54,9
per cent (3.02 cent per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.

It is asking that prior to a full hearing in late March,  85 per cent
of the requested increase on motor fuels (3.5 cents) and 99 per cent
of the increase on furnace oil (3.0 cents) be granted immediately

The increases are substantially more than the 11 per cent growth in
inflation that has occurred since the margins last changed in March
2013. But much of Irving Oil's evidence in support of changes that
large is not being publicly shared to protect company operational and
financial information, an immediate sticking point Monday

    Irving Oil supporters and skeptics lining up on opposite sides of
company price hike request

Beaulieu noted the EUB itself along with public intervener Heather
Black and any experts they hire are permitted to view all the
material, but that did little to satisfy several participants.

Hafsah Mohammad with the Moncton social justice and climate action
group Grassroots NB expressed support for Black's role but said more
perspectives on Irving Oil's application are needed

"I think that has a problematic element with one person speaking for
the entire public," said Mohammad.

"I thought that's why there are interveners. If it is solely on
Heather Black I am concerned with just one person being assigned to
this role."
Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland wrote a
letter to New Brunswick's Energy and Utilities Board, in which he said
an Irving Oil application for petroleum price increases should be
dealt with quickly. (Radio-Canada)

Mohammad also pressed Beaulieu to explain his view on a letter sent to
the EUB by Mike Holland, the New Brunswick natural resources and
energy development minister, and its effect on the hearing..

Holland wrote to the board on Jan. 6, one day after Irving Oil filed
its application, to back the company's request for an "expedited"
review.

"I did not have any intention to comment on the letter but if an
intervener does put it forward I'll comment on it," said Beaulieu.

"I'm putting it forward," said Mohammad

Beaulieu said all citizens have a right to send letters to comment on
matters before the board, and he viewed Holland's as just one of many
that have arrived from the public.
Irving oil lawyer concerned over delay

"Any person in the province of New Brunswick can comment on any
proceeding of the board," said Beaulieu  "We're independent and that
will continue."

Irving Oil lawyer Len Hoyt expressed concern about delays in getting
to the request for immediate price increases, but the application is
effectively on hold for a week while the company's reliance on
confidential information is dealt with first

"The urgency and the expediency of this is of upmost importance to my
client." said Hoyt.

About the Author
Robert Jones

Reporter

Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick
since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New
Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the
adoption of price regulation in 2006.





CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/hanwell-man-sues-nb-liquor-over-agency-store-contract-1.1328143


Hanwell man sues NB Liquor over agency store contract

Moncton's Power Plus Technology won the agency store contract
CBC News · Posted: Apr 23, 2013 9:35 AM AT

A Hanwell convenience store is launching a lawsuit against NB Liquor
to ensure the proper process was put in place in approving a new
agency store licence 1:44

A Fredericton-area convenience store owner is taking NB Liquor to
court to find out why a Moncton company received an agency liquor
store in Hanwell.

NB Liquor’s decision to award Moncton’s Power Plus Technology the
contract to build an agency store next to the Trans-Canada Highway,
near Hanwell, has sparked a local controversy.

The decision has been the focus of public meetings and a petition.

Now Chris Scholten said he is preparing to take the fight to another
level to find out why the two local companies lost out to the Moncton
business.

Scholten said the only way to receive a fair and independent review of
NB Liquor’s decision is to head to court.
Chris Scholten is one of two Hanwell businessowners who lost their
bids to set up a NB Liquor agency store in the Fredericton-area
community. (CBC)

"I’m just looking for a fair, independent review of the decision
process to ensure that the right process was followed, following the
guidelines and the request for proposal to which we applied," he said.

Daniel Allain, the president of NB Liquor, said in February the Crown
corporation formed an internal agency store task force to review the
expansion of the agency store network.

At the time, Allain said the decision to create the task force was
intended to guarantee an "open and transparent process."

NB Liquor did not comment on Monday as the  Hanwell decision is now
heading to court.

But Scholten said NB Liquor has not been open with him on how the
decision was made.

"Unfortunately we’ve just been hit with roadblock after roadblock. We
are just being ignored quite frankly," he said.

Scholten asked the ombudsman's office to investigate.

The office has agreed to review the file but Scholten said he's heard
nothing from the independent office so far.

But Scholten’s lawyer did hear from NB Liquor late on Monday afternoon.

The agency received documentation that had been requested a month ago
under the province’s Right to Information and Protection of Privacy
Act.

Scholten said he will look through the information with his lawyer but
he still plans to take legal action.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|About CBC News


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-liquor-agency-store-contract-in-hanwell-sparks-anger-1.1328145


NB Liquor agency store contract in Hanwell sparks anger
Social Sharing


Community group argues contract should have gone to a local bidder,
not Moncton company
CBC News · Posted: Feb 21, 2013 7:19 PM AT
Liquor store controversy

    8 years ago 2:03

NB Liquor's decision to award the contract for a new agency store in
Hanwell to a Moncton-based company instead of a local one has sparked
the creation of a new community group and a petition 2:03

NB Liquor's decision to award the contract for a new agency store in
Hanwell to a Moncton-based company instead of a local one has sparked
the creation of a new community group and a petition.

Gayla Macintosh, a member of the Concerned Citizens of Hanwell,
contends NB Liquor broke its own rules with the decision.

The Crown agency's guidelines call for contracts for agency stories to
be awarded to local businesses, she said.

Scholten's Convenience Store and the nearby Hanwell Village Mart had
both submitted bids to operate the new agency store.

But Power Plus Technology, owners of the Magnetic Hill Esso gas
station, was the successful bidder for the store, which will be built
next to the Trans Canada Highway near Hanwell, along with a brand gas
bar and convenience store.

"One of the guidelines is that they want it to be a centrally-located
place and this would be it — one of these two stores would be it — and
we don't know why," said Macintosh.
'Unfair' decision
NB Liquor plans to open 10 new agency stores this year. (CBC)

The group is encouraging citizens who oppose the "unfair" decision to
sign a petition supporting a Hanwell bid and to send an email
expressing their "displeasure" to the premier, finance minister, the
local MLA and the head of NB Liquor.

The decision simply doesn't make sense, said Josh Allen, a regular
customer at Scholten's.

"Better here for the economy, for Scholten's itself, bring more
business here, rather than have a business from out of town come in
and take over their clientele," he said.

NB Liquor spokeswoman Marcelle Saulnier says decisions about where the
10 new agency stores will go this year is based on customer traffic,
location and site evaluation, among other criteria.

"In this case we hired a firm to go look at the various proposals that
we accepted and they came back with a scoring," she said.

The criteria does give points for being locally-owned and operated,
but it's low on the list, said Saulnier.

None of the companies' owners would comment on Thursday.

The Concerned Citizens of Hanwell will be holding an information
session on Monday at 7 p.m. at the Starlite Lodge. The group has
invited NB Liquor CEO Daniel Allain to attend.
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-liquor-agency-store-dispute-in-hanwell-goes-to-ombudsman-1.1305792


NB Liquor agency store dispute in Hanwell goes to ombudsman

Convenience store owner contends contract should have gone to local bidder
CBC News · Posted: Mar 15, 2013 5:24 PM AT | Last Updated: March 15, 2013
Scholten’s Convenience Store was one of the two local businesses that
lost a bid to operate the agency store. (CBC)

The owner of a convenience store near Fredericton who lost his bid to
become an agency store for NB Liquor is taking his case to the
provincial ombudsman.

Chris Scholten, of Scholten's Convenience Store in Hanwell, contends
local bidders are supposed to be given preference.

But the Hanwell contract went to Moncton-based gas retailer Power Plus
Technology instead.

Scholten says he's gone through the NB Liquor review process, has
spoken to the president of the Crown agency and even put a call in to
the minister of finance, but is still not satisfied with the answers
he's received about why the other company won.

"We feel that even the mandate of this agency program has been
violated. We feel that the procedures that were to be followed have
been violated. And we question the evaluations of the independent
proposals as well — that they were unfairly evaluated," he said.

"So we're just looking for an independent review to make sure that the
proper decision was made."
A conceptual drawing of a proposed gas station and NB Liquor agency
store in Hanwell. (CBC)

Hanwell Village Mart had also applied to be an agency store.

Jason Lutes, the owner of Power Plus Technology, has said he believes
the matter is being blown out of proportion and denied being awarded
the contract because of any political connections.

He was already planning to build a convenience store in the area
before the call for applications from NB Liquor for an agency store,
he said.

Lutes will build the store next to the Trans-Canada Highway near
Hanwell, along with a gas bar and convenience store.

Some Hanwell residents have expressed concerns the new store will pull
business away from existing stores in the area. The issue has sparked
the creation of a new community group called Concerned Citizens of
Hanwell and a petition.

NB Liquor officials have said decisions about new agency stores are
based on customer traffic, location and site evaluation, among other
criteria.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-budget-double-tax-cut-private-sector-1.5493205


'Double taxation' cut will energize private sector, say N.B. business leaders

Province reducing tax on buildings like rental properties by 50%
Colin McPhail · CBC News · Posted: Mar 10, 2020 8:44 PM AT

Rental property owners and business officials say new tax cuts
announced by the Progressive Conservative government Tuesday will help
stoke the New Brunswick economy and spur construction.

Finance Minister Ernie Steeves announced a 50 per cent reduction in
the provincial non-owner-occupied property residential tax over a
four-year period starting in the 2021 taxation year.

Owners and developers have long sought to scrap the so-called "double
tax" which levies a provincial tax on top of the municipal tax for
buildings like rental properties and cottages.

Willy Scholten, president of the New Brunswick Apartment Owners
Association, said his group has been lobbying government officials on
the issue since 2004.

He believes the move will lead to new construction.
Bryan Eneas/CBC


"We have a lot of issues right now with not enough supply of rental
apartments in the province, and a lot of our association attributes a
lot of that to this double taxation," Scholten said following
Steeves's address in the legislature.

"We don't have outside people coming to the province and saying this
is a good place to do business."

The tax rate will drop from $1.233 per $100 of assessed value to
$0.5617 — or about 14.04 cents per year until 2024.

The owners' association has proposed phasing the tax out completely
over a three-year period, but Scholten said this is a step in the
right direction.

"We hope that they continue after here to the eventual full
elimination, so we are no longer offside with the rest of the
country," said Scholten, adding New Brunswick is the lone Canadian
jurisdiction to impose such a tax.

More budget day coverage:

Could the tax savings be passed onto tenants? Scholten said it's too
early to tell.

"It's not a full elimination and we don't know what's going to happen
with assessments either along the way," he said. "So we'll have to
wait to see what happens with our property tax bills."

The PCs also plan to reduce the non-residential property tax rate —
including commercial and industrial buildings — by 8.25 cents per year
until 2024. That will decrease the rate from $2.1860 per $100 of
assessment to $1.8560.

The $10.2-billion provincial budget projects a $92.4-million surplus
and to reduce the net debt by $129.3 million. The budget is buoyed,
however, by a $200-million increase in federal transfer payments.

"We have to, beyond balancing the budget, give back," Steeves told reporters.

"We thought [the tax reductions] were ones that would help businesses
and, ultimately, help a lot of New Brunswickers and, ultimately, help
the economy of New Brunswick."

'You have to focus on the private sector'

The budget struck a chord with People's Alliance Leader Kris Austin.
His party has long argued against double taxation for
non-owner-occupied properties.

"If you want true economic growth, you have to focus on the private
sector," he said. "The best way to that is tax reduction and
deregulation."

Austin said all three Alliance members will vote in favour, while
Liberal Leader Kevin Vickers maintained that his party will vote
against the budget in an attempt to topple the government.
Ed Hunter/CBC


Green Leader David Coon told reporters his caucus — and its three
crucial votes — has reserved a decision until meeting to discuss.

Also included in the budget is the Higgs government's carbon pricing
plan. It will be set at 6.6 cents per litre at the pumps — same as the
federal backstop — but the Tories will cut the New Brunswick gas tax
by 4.6 cents, creating a net two-cent increase.

The government has not passed its carbon tax legislation and if the
budget is defeated and an election is called, it won't get the chance,
meaning the federal price will be in place on April 1.

David Duplisea, CEO of the Saint John Region Chamber of Commerce, said
if that's the case, it will make New Brunswick less competitive with
neighbouring provinces like Nova Scotia.

Encouraged by the private-sector support, Duplisea said there isn't
anything in or not in the budget worth toppling the government over.

He said many of his 700 members wanted the tax breaks in one form or
another, and this creates a "positive investment climate."

"These items … we have been asking for these and we're confident that
this will help to spur investment in our respective regions and in the
province as a whole," Duplisea said.

Both the Saint John and Fredericton chambers of commerce lauded the
government for reducing the net debt and balancing the budget.

Krista Ross, CEO of the Fredericton Chamber of Commerce, specifically
highlighted the double taxation policy in a statement Tuesday.

"This will make business in New Brunswick more competitive and give us
a chance to build economic momentum, which in turn will allow
government to further reduce debt and deliver more services," Ross
said.

"In the coming years, this will be even more important as we cannot
expect to receive large increases in equalization payments on an
annual basis."



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/inclusionary-zoning-double-tax-1.5394435

Forcing builders to include low-income units not a solution, say developers


Social Development Minister Dorothy Shephard open to exploring
inclusionary zoning
CBC News · Posted: Dec 12, 2019 6:02 PM AT | Last Updated: December 12, 2019
The province’s practice of taxing non-owner-occupied properties
differently than owner-occupied properties has long been a complaint
among landlords and developers. (Bryan Eneas/CBC)

Two Fredericton developers question the wisdom of implementing
inclusionary zoning, a policy that forces developers to include
affordable units in their projects.

Social Development Minister Dorothy Shephard has said it would be
"interesting" to explore a proposed Montreal bylaw that would make
developers either set aside a certain number of units in their
buildings as affordable units or pay into a fund for social housing.

"I think with the help of our municipalities that it's worthy of
looking at," Shephard said.

But Jeff Yerxa, the president and CEO of Ross Ventures Ltd., said
while the idea is worth looking at, any development would still have
to make money, and mandating units could make that difficult for
certain projects.
Sees problem with some developments

"I think that every development has got its own place in the market,"
Yerxa said.

"If you're doing a big waterfront development, I think it's tough to
include affordable housing … I don't think it's reasonable for the
province to subsidize rent for affordable housing for people in, you
know, developments such as that."

    Province to spend $629K on new affordable housing units over 3
years, $12M on repairs

Willy Scholten, the president of the NB Apartment Owners Association,
said he opposes any new "hurdles."

"The problem with doing this ... inclusionary zoning … is [it's]
another hurdle for development," said Scholten.

"If we start doing more and more of putting more and more hurdles we
have less development. If we have less development, we have less
units."

Scholten said the province could do more to increase development by
ending the so-called "double tax" on rental properties.
No exemption

"We need to fix that, and that'll make affordability easier and make
the whole development easier," said Scholten.

"We'll get more development. More development will mean the vacancy
rates will go up. Rental rates will go down."

The province's practice of taxing non-owner-occupied properties
differently from owner-occupied properties has long been a complaint
among landlords and developers.

    'I've never felt shame like this in my life': 500 homeless, 5,000
await affordable housing

The tax sees landlords pay both municipal and provincial property
taxes on their rental properties and aren't eligible for a break on
those.

While owner-occupied properties also are assessed taxes by both the
province and municipality, the owners can receive tax credits that
largely eliminate the provincial portion.

Scholten said the province is bringing in enough revenue to offset
what it would lose in revenue if it ended the "double tax." If that
happened, landlords would be willing to freeze rental rates for a
period, he said.

with files from Information Morning Fredericton



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/property-tax-cut-benefits-landlords-says-ndp-leader-1.1129675

Property tax cut benefits landlords, says NDP leader

CBC News · Posted: Sep 18, 2012 6:21 AM AT

New Democratic Party Leader Dominic Cardy says landlords in New
Brunswick appear to be backing away from a promise on lower rents.

Last week, the provincial government announced it is cutting property
taxes for the owners of apartment buildings, but won't force them to
pass the savings to tenants.

The NDP leader said the landlords should stand by what they said.
NDP Leader Dominic Cardy says landlords could stand behind a promise
on lower rents. (CBC)

"I think they need to go back to look at the statements they made a
few months ago," Cardy said.

"I think they need to be held to account, and the government does as
well, because they said the purpose of this was to help renters, and
instead it's going to help just the landlords, and that's not fair."

The provincial budget in March promised a gradual reduction in property taxes.
Election promise

Back then, Willy Scholten of the New Brunswick Apartment Owners
Association predicted the provincial government would force landlords
to pass on the savings.

"I would see the government not giving up the revenue without some
sort of legislation to make sure that it does happen, and we would
support that," Scholten said at the time.

Last week, Scholten no longer supported provincial government
enforcement of lower rental fees.

"We're private business, and we believe that the markets should
dictate that, so we wouldn't agree with that," he said.

Scholten said he would support enforcement if the tenant tax were
eliminated altogether, but that's not happening.

He said with other costs rising, the gradual tax reduction isn't
enough for landlords to even freeze rents.

The 2010 Progressive Conservative election platform promised that an
"easing" of the tenant tax would "benefit those living in apartments."

It now appears that promise will only be kept by landlords who choose
to honour it.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices





https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/bruce-fitch-plans-overhaul-of-property-tax-system-1.1207180


Bruce Fitch plans overhaul of property tax system

'Spike protection' mechanism will guard against assessment hikes above 10%
CBC News · Posted: Sep 12, 2012 11:04 AM AT

Local Government Minister Bruce Fitch announced a series of property
tax reform proposals on Wednesday. (CBC)

New Brunswick homeowners will be offered a new "spike protection"
mechanism to guard against large property tax assessment hikes, Local
Government Minister Bruce Fitch announced on Wednesday.

Fitch released a discussion document on property tax reform that
called for a number of changes.

"We are fulfilling our commitment to make a fairer and more effective
property tax system," Fitch said in a statement.

As a part of the provincial government’s proposed package of reforms,
the three-per-cent property tax freeze is being lifted.
Interactive feature

Click here to find out how different communities spend their property taxes

The local government minister said homeowners will be moving back to a
market-value system where their property assessments, which are used
to calculate property taxes, can fluctuate.

Fitch said there will be a permanent exemption given for the 146,000
homeowners who took advantage of the two-year assessment cap.

For example, if a person saved $10,000 between the 2012 market value
and the 2012 capped value of their property, they will receive an
exemption for that rate. So every year when that person's property
assessment comes in, they will be exempted for $10,000.

However, when they sell their house, the new owner will pay the full
market rate.

The provincial government estimates it will take about 20 years for
all the exemptions to work their way out of the system.

As well, homeowners will be given the option of paying for their
property taxes monthly instead of in one large annual payment.

The provincial government will also introduce a mechanism to safeguard
homeowners from property tax, assessment increases of more than 10 per
cent.
Ending 'double taxation'

Another element of the property tax plan is to reduce the amount of
tax by 23 per cent that is imposed on rental properties, commercial
properties and second homes.

Building owners have complained for years they have to pass on the
extra cost to tenants.

There's also to be help for homeowners.

Fitch said he hopes the change will mean relief for tenants.

"This will help the landlords, and we expect those savings will be
passed on to the renters, to help either lower rent, improve the
quality of housing, or mitigate any planned increases in the rental
prices," Fitch said.

But the reforms announced on Wednesday will not force apartment
building owners to pass on the savings.

Owners say the tax break isn't enough to guarantee rent reductions but
it may help landlords put off rent increases.

Other elements of the property tax reform paper include:

    Property tax bills will be simplified.
    A new cost-sharing model for RCMP services that will more fairly
distributing costs among all users.
    Minimizing the impact of these reforms on farmers, homeowners and
businesses in local service districts.
    Exempting libraries from property tax.

The tax reduction doesn't go far enough, according to Willy Sholten of
the New Brunswick Apartment Owners Association.

"This will mean that we'll still be 1.8 times the single family rate
and 1.8 times the average in Canada. So there's still quite a gap. But
the government has done something and it's being portrayed as the
first phase."

But any tax reduction is good, according to Kevin Lacey, Atlantic
director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

"This tax reduction will mean that those living in apartments in the
long-term will likely see a benefit. And this combined with the
government's announcement in the budget that it will freeze rental
rates is a good thing for taxpayers of the province."

The provincial government says it won't be losing money because of the
tax reductions.

It expects it'll be covered by a doubling of the real property
transfer fee in the last budget that should generate up to an extra $8
million each year.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

 

MLA Update About Grassroots Democracy Building on a Foundation of Truth and Justice Determination and Dedication Servant Leadership and Honesty

$
0
0

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/ali-duale-tim-houston-anti-racisim-legislation-1.6233948 

 

MLA ends protest following commitment from premier to work on anti-racism legislation

Ali Duale was planning not to be at Province House for the duration of the fall sitting

Liberal MLA Ali Duale says he will take his seat this week at Province House following a commitment from Nova Scotia's premier to bring in anti-racism legislation in the spring.

Duale, who represents Halifax Armdale, said PC Premier Tim Houston sent a letter Monday inviting the Liberal caucus to establish an all-party committee that will "produce legislation to address systemic racism in government." The NDP was also invited.

He told reporters at Province House that Houston first floated the idea by him during a conversation on Friday.

"This is how this legislature is supposed to be," said Duale.

"We've been elected across this province as Nova Scotians with the best interest of Nova Scotians. My hope as a rookie politician [is] to see my term, this mindset and this collaboration to continue [on] every subject matter."

New Democrat MLA Suzy Hansen says she's looking forward to a collaborative approach to drafting legislation. (Robert Short/CBC)

New Democrat MLA Suzy Hansen said her party would also participate in the committee to draft legislation. She said she's keeping an open mind on how the work will play out, but she is a fan of the approach.

"I think if we did that for everything that would be amazing, because then all of us could have our say on what we think is important from each of our perspectives," Hansen told reporters.

"I'm all about educating and making sure that we're looking at it from the proper lens and utilizing all of our conversations and being able to talk about it candidly and then coming to, hopefully, a consensus of a conclusion to do the right thing."

'We want to get this right'

Houston told reporters it made sense to bring everyone together on the bill, because "that's the way the system works best."

"We'll expand the group out to community members, as well. We want to get it right. It's important. It's an important time for Nova Scotia and we want to get this right."

The premier said he'd previously asked African Nova Scotian Affairs Minister Pat Dunn to assemble an all-party committee to talk about "a broad range of issues."

Duale announced last week he intended not to sit at the legislature for the duration of the fall sitting as a form of protest, until the government agreed to pass Bill 12, a piece of anti-racism legislation put forward by the Nova Scotia Liberal Party.

At the time, Houston said the province's Office of Equity and Anti-Racism was working on similar legislation, but he did not think it would be ready for the fall sitting. He committed to having the office marry it with parts of the Liberal bill.

Staffer fired for racist comments about MLA

Duale's planned protest followed revelations that his Liberal colleague, Preston MLA Angela Simmonds, was the subject of racist comments by a political staffer in a social media message exchange.

Houston, upon learning of the comments, informed Simmonds, Liberal Leader Iain Rankin, and then fired the staffer, who worked with the Justice Department.

Last Friday, Duale said without a clear commitment to legislation aimed at removing racism from government institutions, MLAs of colour could not truly feel safe at work. Province House could not be considered the people's House if the members who sat there could not support such legislation, he said.

In his statement, Duale touched on why the issue is so important.

"As the first Muslim and first refugee to be elected to the Nova Scotia Legislature, this bill speaks to the very reason I chose to enter politics," Duale said in his statement Tuesday.

"I firmly believe this bill sets politics aside and puts the people first — a principle that guides me as I serve as MLA."

For more stories about the experiences of Black Canadians — from anti-Black racism to success stories within the Black community — check out Being Black in Canada, a CBC project Black Canadians can be proud of. You can read more stories here.


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/angela-simmonds-tim-houston-racism-political-staffer-1.6230245

 

MLAs speak in support of colleague after racist comments come to light

Angela Simmonds was the target of remarks by a now-former political staffer

Opposition members stood in solidarity Friday with Liberal MLA Angela Simmonds at Province House after learning she was the subject of racist comments by a political staffer.

The staffer, who worked with the Justice Department, was fired by Premier Tim Houston on Thursday after he learned of the comments. The premier informed Simmonds and Liberal Leader Iain Rankin of what happened shortly after he learned about it.

On Friday, during members' statements at Province House, all Liberal MLAs and some New Democrats dedicated their statements to speaking in support of Simmonds, as well as the other Black MLAs in the House — Ali Duale, Suzy Hansen and Tony Ince.

Simmonds said she was overwhelmed and moved by the support of her colleagues.

"I have fought issues before, but it was the very first time in a long time where it was a family and I could just feel people's emotions forming," she told reporters at Province House.

"It was a complete privilege and honour to be standing there witnessing that."

Suzy Hansen is the New Democrat MLA for Halifax Needham. (Robert Short/CBC)

While racism might not be regularly discussed on the floor of the legislature, Simmonds said current and past Black MLAs have been having these conversations and experiences. The conversations need to keep happening, she said.

"We need to be comfortable in our discomfort," Simmonds said. "Saying, 'We acknowledge it and we care,' is not enough.

"It is not enough because we were elected officials to be here and it is not OK to say that we are going to do better. We need to see that we're doing better."

Hansen, the NDP member for Halifax Needham, said it's one thing for conversations to happen inside the chamber, but she said those conversations also need to happen in smaller groups among MLAs.

"We need to have some heart-to-heart conversations, to be uncomfortable, to feel that, but also to share," she told reporters.

"And we need to do that in a space that's going to be safe for everyone."

Premier Tim Houston said his government is working on an anti-racism piece of legislation. (Robert Short/CBC)

The premier told reporters that much work remains to fight racism in the province and his government is committed to doing its part.

"There's a lot of initiatives, many initiatives that had already been started by the previous government through the Office of Equity and Anti-Racism. We support those strongly and we'll continue to do as much as possible to fight racism in this province," said Houston.

Simmonds and the Liberals have argued the situation that played out Thursday illustrates the need for a bill they've put forward that would define racism and hate, and create an action plan to remove it from government departments and Crown corporations.

Duale announced that beginning Tuesday, as a form of protest, he will not take his seat in the House during the fall sitting unless that bill is passed.

The Halifax-Armdale MLA said the bill was the key reason he entered politics, and a legislature that cannot support such a bill cannot be considered the people's House.

  Ali Duale speaks to reporters about Bill 12 outside the chamber at Province House on Friday. (Robert Short/CBC)

"If these things are taking place inside this House, do you think the community is safe? If this happens [to] one of us, do you think anybody is safe? And if this is ignored, do you think we believe there is justice, fairness and human rights? I don't think so, and that's why I'm making this decision," said Duale.

Rankin said he supports Duale's protest.

Houston said he backs the intent of the Liberals' bill, but said something similar is already being drafted by the Office of Equity and Anti-Racism. While he doesn't think it will be ready in time for this sitting, the premier said it would marry elements of the Liberal bill and he's willing to work with them.

"We just need to make sure that we do the work to get it right [before] we move forward," said Houston.

For more stories about the experiences of Black Canadians — from anti-Black racism to success stories within the Black community — check out Being Black in Canada, a CBC project Black Canadians can be proud of. You can read more stories here.

(CBC)

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/angela-simmonds-tim-houston-racism-political-staffer-1.6229440

 

N.S. premier fires political staffer for comments about Liberal MLA

Angela Simmonds says she deserves to feel safe at Province House

Nova Scotia Premier Tim Houston fired a political staffer on Thursday after learning they made racist comments about Liberal MLA Angela Simmonds in a social media exchange.

Houston had a meeting with Simmonds and Liberal Leader Iain Rankin to inform them about it shortly after it was brought to his attention by his own staff.

"The premier wanted to let me know that there was some racist, inappropriate, derogatory comments made about me on social media by one of his staffers," Simmonds said in an interview.

The messages were exchanged between the staffer, who worked with the Justice department, and a friend. In Snapchat exchanges the staffer said Simmonds didn't know what she was talking about and was quick to "play the race card."

Simmonds said the premier made clear the staffer's actions weren't acceptable and wouldn't be tolerated within government. She's hopeful something positive can come from it.

"That something is going to be that you cannot treat people this way or say things about people without having consequences for your actions, in particular when we serve the public," she said.

"I can't come into a legislature as a Black woman, doing my job in a space that it doesn't feel safe and every time I raise issues of importance it then becomes about a Black woman who doesn't know what she's talking about or playing a race card or those sort of behaviours."

Simmonds said it was particularly troubling because she'd been in meetings with the staffer in her capacity as the Liberal justice critic.

Zero tolerance for inappropriate behaviour: premier

The premier said he was "taken aback" upon learning what happened. He said he wanted Simmonds to hear about it from him and to know he'd be taking action.

"There is zero tolerance for any type of inappropriate behaviour," Houston said in an interview.

The attention of his government is focused on "making sure that people know there's no room for racism in our society," he said. There will always be work to do on the issue and Houston said he's committed to doing it.

"I haven't walked in the shoes. I'm always trying to learn and to listen and to be respectful."

The Liberals have a bill before the House aimed at creating a multi-year strategy and action plan to eliminate racism and hate from government departments, Crown corporations and arm's-length organizations. It includes definitions for what constitutes racism and hate.

Simmonds said passing that legislation would send the message that "we were heard, and we matter."

"Change is about progression and that's what this bill would mean, is that we are moving forward. We're defining things that have never been defined before … And it raises the bar of how we need to treat people."

 

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/racism-street-checks-police-justice-minister-brad-johns-1.6228981

 

Justice minister says street checks loophole to be closed next month

Brad Johns says he expects to issue a ministerial directive by the end of November

Nova Scotia Justice Minister Brad Johns says the loophole on street checks will be closed by the end of November.

Johns was asked several times during question period Thursday about his department's plans to do away with a provision that allows police street checks to persist under the guise of investigating suspicious activity.

It's been established already that the practice is illegal and disproportionately targets Black people and other people of colour. The former Liberal government brought in a ban on the practice, however the loophole remained.

Johns told reporters at Province House that he expects to be able to issue a ministerial directive by the end of November. The minister said most of the work required has been completed, but he wants to have a chance first to meet with representatives from Black communities to make sure things are correct.

"That's the most important thing to me," said Johns.

Preston MLA Angela Simmonds is the Nova Scotia Liberal Party's justice critic. (Jean Laroche/CBC)

Liberal justice critic Angela Simmonds, whose district of Preston includes several historical Black communities, noted the government already has recommendations from the Decade for People of African Descent Coalition.

"This isn't anything new," Simmonds told reporters. "What's new is that we represent the voices in the House."

Simmonds said she doesn't think there's been much of a reduction in street checks since they were banned because of how much discretion remains for police. She said clarifying the language would help officers, too.

"This isn't just for communities, but it's actually to protect law enforcement as well because they do have to do their job," she said.

"And so we can appreciate the kind of grey area that this has caused, for sure. But what we do know is it is illegal and it continues to be illegal until the legislation changes and until they address the language."


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 https://nslegislature.ca/members/profiles/angela-simmonds

Angela Simmonds

Simmonds, Angela
Liberal

Angela Simmonds was first elected to the Nova Scotia House of Assembly as MLA for Preston in 2021.

She is a Deputy Speaker.

Ms. Simmonds is a lawyer. Prior to becoming an MLA, she was the Executive Director of the Land Titles Initiative in the Office of Equity and Anti-Racism.

She is a member of the Law Amendments Committee. She is also a member of the House of Assembly Management Commission.

Constituency Party Start Date
Preston Liberal 2021

Contact details

Constituency office

Civic address:

49 Wilfred Jackson Way
Dartmouth, NS
B2Z 1A8

Business address

Nova Scotia Liberal Caucus Office
5151 George St., Suite 1402
P.O. Box 741
Halifax, NS
B3J 2T3

Phone: 902-424-8637
Fax: 902-424-0539
Phone: 902-433-1494
office@angelasimmonds.ca

 

Add star 

mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com

<mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com>
Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:02 PM
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

MLA Update (Case Ref: ES3077)

   


Dear David Amos

 
MLA Weekly Update 

Date Monday, September 27th, 2021


My Mission as MLA for Cumberland North 

Now is ReBuilding Cumberland North Together with you 

Building on a Foundation of - 

Truth and Justice
Determination and Dedication
Servant Leadership
And Honesty

We will Build On the Pillars of - 

Timely Access to Health Care when needed
Poverty Reduction and Empowering All People
Environment and Caring for our Earth
Entrepreneurship and Business

Last week in Politics

Monday I attended an important meeting with my colleague Tory Rushton in Cumberland South and Mayor Murray Scott with staff from the Northern Zone Nova Scotia Health to discuss the urgent need for nursing staff at Cumberland Regional and All Saints Hospital. 

If you know of any nurses that may be interested in “coming home” to Cumberland to work in one of our hospitals please share with them the links below. You can also encourage them to reach out to me and I will personally make sure that a local nurse manager gets their resume. One of the major problems contributing to this problem of lack of nurses is the centralization of power and control leading to a very ineffective hiring process which has very limited actual human connection and no local decision making. I am confident based on the PC health plan, that positive changes are coming that will improve these hiring processes. In the meantime we do need to urgently help to fix our current situation so that the nurses we do have will stay to care for you and I and our families. 

This is the link to public postings for registered nurse positions at Nova Scotia Health https://jobs.nshealth.ca/nsha/go/Registered-Nurse/2570417/
 and the link to licensed practical nurse positions https://jobs.nshealth.ca/nsha/go/Licensed-Practical-Nurse/2570517/
 
After working in my office I joined some friends in the campaign HQ for Dr Stephen Ellis. Dr Ellis won the election here in the riding of Cumberland Colchester. I look forward to working with him. He seems equally as concerned about the violations of the Canada Health Act and I am confident together we can produce an effective voice for our area. 

Tuesday I held meetings with constituents. I also joined Sheila Christie, Brad from the Wesleyan Church and Denise Allen at 26 Maltby Court in Amherst to show our community the newest Food pantry that is set up. Denise came to me during the election in August and told me she was concerned about children and families going hungry. We contacted Sheila who started a food pantry, the one across from Maggie’s Place and contacted the Wesleyan Church about a location and voila, one month later it is done. “Leave what you can and take what you need” concept. Together we can accomplish anything we set our minds to, let’s work to remove barriers and have a ‘can-do” attitude despite the challenges we may face. 
In the evening I attended the Annual General Meeting in the evening for the Pugwash Village Commission. 

Wednesday I had a meeting with the Atlantic Physicians Provider Services Society, a group of local business women and men led by Mr. Sean Cheverie. 
I met with the Cumberland County Transportation Services Board. CCTS provides valuable transportation in the county. If you are looking for an area to help in our county, consider joining this board. They are also looking for more drivers. If you have time and want to help please contact Helen Sims at 902-667-8149. The CCTS is regulated by the provincial Utility and Review Board and I will be exploring ways to support this important board and the transportation services it provides. 

In addition to having meetings with constituents on Wednesday, we held our first Grassroots Democracy gathering here in Amherst. There were approximately 30 people in attendance and we had a healthy robust brainstorming session. We discussed issues we wanted to see change in Cumberland North. Those in attendance worked together to identify areas needed for growth as well as started working on identifying solutions. More time is needed before breaking into working groups so we made a decision to meet again to continue our work. Date will be shared in upcoming correspondence. If you are interested in joining the discussion please call the office and let us know 902-661-2288 or email me at Elizabeth.Smith-McCrossin@novascotia.ca

Thursday I attended a 40th Anniversary celebration at the Cumberland County Museum with a visit from the Lieutenant  Governor Arthur LeBlanc and his wife Patsy LeBlanc. While there I purchased a book recently written by local author Mr. Stephen Leahey. His book entitled “Chignecto & Remsheg prior to 1755” is a look into our unique history in our area. The book is available at the Museum. 

I had meetings with constituents and then attended a funeral at the Legion for Veteran Glen Brown. He was brother to local Veteran Lorne Baird. 
Afterwards I met with Mayor Scott and Mayor Kogan, MLA Tory Rushton along with Chairs of the Hospital Health Boards of Amherst and Springhill to discuss the urgent need for nurses to stop the NS Health plan to decrease hours in the ER at the Springhill hospital.

Cumberland Forestry Advisory Meeting was held Thursday evening. Forestry is an important part of our heritage, our economy and our future here in Cumberland and throughout the Region. The CFAC has an active monthly newsletter and if you are interested in taking a look, please visit 
https://us2.campaign-archive.com/?u=2fac4ba10a40eb5ef01e76969&id=094b2b0dc8&fbclid=IwAR2hciqa0hPTa4zUrCVJwV6_SfQzJxMpQ71JaOZwav0f-9OcSPRdY-X6nOQ


My colleague in Cumberland South Mr. Tory Rushton is Nova Scotia’s new Minister of Lands & Forestry. We are looking forward to a strong future in forestry under Tory Rushton’s leadership. 

I drove to Halifax in the evening to be at the Legislature for the am. I also watched an interesting meeting called the Stanfield Conversations: Talking Democracy - “Democracy on the Edge”. I am concerned about the state of our democracy and I enjoyed listening to the conversation hosted by Dalhousie University. 

Friday The Nova Scotia Legislature sat Friday morning to give us an opportunity to elect a Speaker. We elected Keith Bain as Speaker and Angela Simmonds and Lisa Lachance as deputy Speakers. Photos from Friday’s special sitting of the legislative assembly are available at: https://news.novascotia.ca/photos/2021/09/24/special-sitting-choose-speaker-and-deputy-speakers

The first session of the 64th General Assembly will resume at 1 p.m. on Tuesday, Oct. 12 when the Lieutenant-Governor of Nova Scotia delivers the speech from the throne.

I will be preparing for the 64th General Assembly daily between now and the 12th of October. 

Friday I also attended the funeral for the Allen/Robertson and Sears families that recently lost their family of 6 in a tragic fire. The funeral service was held outdoors in Victoria Park in Amherst. It was an emotional service and very well organized by the staff at Campbell’s Funeral Home. So many people suffered loss in our community and the families of RJ, Michelle, and their four innocent children will be missed. Our community will continue to support them.

Sunday I attended the National Annual General Meeting for Equal Voice and will stay on the Board as the Nova Scotia Director. I look forward to supporting more women and work towards gender parity in our political leadership. 

This week in Politics 

Today is Medic Monday. We honour and thank our paramedics for their service to our communities. 

I have a busy week with meetings and will be focusing on preparing for the Legislature as well. 

Saturday there is a lot of action in Pugwash with the Farmer’s Market and Farmer’s Olympics Fun & Games from 9-1pm. There is also a band playing in addition to the regular amazing vendors selling their local products. 
https://pugwashfarmersmarket.com/

Maritime focus

Tuesday is the Atlantic Premiers Council Meeting. It was scheduled for Monday and Tuesday, in person meetings but got changed to a one day virtual meeting. I am looking forward to hearing some positive outcomes from this meeting. I have been asking for a coordinated Maritime approach to the pandemic for a year now. We are all fighting the same virus. Our Medical officers of health could be working together for a Regional approach. We are too small to be working in isolation. Of course, our border towns in Cumberland and Westmoreland understand better than anyone the stress when our provinces do not work together. 


Politically speaking, Saturday was a significant day in International politics. The “two Michael’s” came home after being detained in China for over 1000 days. They were held hostage but released after a British Colombia court dropped the Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou extradition case. Meng reached a deferred prosecution agreement with the US.
​​​​​​

Birthdays
I would like to extend Birthday greetings to anyone celebrating a birthday or Anniversary this week, including:

Monday - Jean Surette and Kaili-Pipes
Tuesday - Brittany Melanson and Mike MacKenzie
Wednesday - Joanne Hart and Jeff Bacon 
Thursday - Brad Meisner and Marc Busked
Friday - Todd Blenkhorn and John Baxter
Saturday - Tim Hurley and Amy MacDonald

Obituaries
I would like to extend my sympathies to anyone who has lost a loved one recently, including the family and friends of:


Heather Susan Ripley

https://www.arbormemorial.ca/campbells/obituaries/heather-susan-ripley/71706/
​​
Kenneth Anthony Ontychuck

https://www.arbormemorial.ca/campbells/obituaries/kenneth-anthony-ontychuck/71836/
​​​​​​
Jocelyn Evelyn Atkinson

https://www.arbormemorial.ca/campbells/obituaries/joyce-evelyn-atkinson/71887/

Dianne Sarah Bacon

https://www.arbormemorial.ca/campbells/obituaries/dianne-sarah-bacon/71854/

Gary Lester Bickerton

https://www.arbormemorial.ca/campbells/obituaries/gary-lester-bickerton/64984/
​​​​​​
Daphne Grant 

https://www.jonesfuneralhome.ca/obituaries/156723
​​​​​​
Ellis Goodwin

https://www.jonesfamilyfuneralcentre.ca/obituaries/156620
​​​​​​
Paulette Croft

https://www.mmcfunerals.com/obituary/paulette-croft

James Mont

https://www.mmcfunerals.com/obituary/james-mont


Final thoughts

We all know life is short. Time flies by us faster than most of us want. 
Be sure that you are living your best life
While we live during this global pandemic
We are in control of some things
Like what we eat, drink, 
What we say and how we choose to respond to others.

As a nurse and as a Mom,
I love prevention.
Prevention of problems, illness, disease
Is always the best medicine.

Fall is here, flu season approaching
Make sure your diet is healthy, lots of foods with vitamins and minerals
Lots of water and healthy fresh air and sunshine
Be sure to continue your infection control measures to prevent 
Getting a flu virus or Covid virus from anyone else
Good hand washing is always the best prevention. 
And of course the flu vaccine will be available in about 3 weeks from your doctor, NP and pharmacist. 
Although vaccines have become more controversial during this pandemic, 
Vaccination does prevent viral illness. 

Let’s keep educating ourselves, 
Let’s treat one another with respect, 
Despite our differences
Let’s keep the conversation going
United we stand
Divided we fall
And falling isn’t an option 
So let’s stand together, despite our differences. 

Lets embrace our humanity
Our strengths and our weaknesses
Our knowledge and our lack of knowledge
Our hurts and our pains

Lets embrace one another
Forgive, Love, extend Grace 
And move forward as one people
Broken, hurt,
But never willing to stop giving and living 
With all our heart, soul and mind. 

Have great week, 
Take care of yourself and one another

Elizabeth 



Elizabeth Smith-McCrossin MBA, BScN
Cumberland North MLA 
                            
Live everyday to the fullest and love as much as humanly possible.
















 


A challenger emerges to Nova Scotia Power's renewable retail electricity monopoly

$
0
0

 


 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/utility-and-review-board-renewable-electricity-roswall-development-1.6227865

 

A challenger emerges to Nova Scotia Power's renewable retail electricity monopoly

Roswall Development Inc. has been issued a licence by the UARB, but many hurdles remain

On Tuesday, the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board awarded the first retail supplier licence to a numbered company subsidiary of Roswall Development Inc.

Roswall president Dan Roscoe said it means Nova Scotians will now have a choice from whom they purchase electricity.

"Today, history was made in Nova Scotia," he said.

The licence is an essential step in the company's plans to develop a 33-megawatt wind farm on Crown land that was part of the Bowater Mersey holdings near Milton in Queens County.

The company forecasts sales to 15 industrial and about 800 residential customers starting in late 2023.

"It's an important tool for accelerating our transition to a green economy. This will enable both individuals and businesses to achieve their various carbon goals," said Roscoe, a veteran wind power developer and the renewable energy lead at Cape Breton University's Verschuren Centre for Sustainability in Energy and the Environment.

'Competitive rates' promised

Both Roscoe and the board are clear the licence is just a first step.

The wind farm still has major hurdles to clear, including passing an environmental assessment, working out interconnection arrangements with Nova Scotia Power, and getting customers to actually sign up.

Rates are also a work in progress.

They will incorporate tariffs the company must pay Nova Scotia Power to use its transmission lines.

"We will be able to provide competitive rates that are stable over time," said Roscoe.

A sober assessment from the regulator

In approving the licence, NSUARB member Stephen McGrath wrote that while the company presented "a reasonable business model," this was contingent on many assumptions.

"It recognized it would need to make significant investment in understanding this market, the technical and financial applications, and the optimization of various assets and resources on an ongoing basis," he wrote.

"The company acknowledged that it would have to grow its team and seek strategic partnerships to make its proposed model successful."

Roswall has filed an application to lease Crown land for the wind farm and a development permit with the Region of Queens Municipality.

Why cabinet must approve the venture

Roswall Development is the first company to take advantage of the "renewable to retail" program created seven years ago by a Liberal government under Stephen McNeil.

One of the company principals and chair of the Roswall board is Michel Samson, a former energy minister in the McNeil government.

Although the Liberals created the framework through the Electricity Act, regulations and other steps, the government did not say when sales could begin.

As a result, the licence issued by the board will include a condition that no sales can occur before the provincial cabinet sets a date.

The licence is held by 4363174 Nova Scotia Limited, which was registered on Oct. 4, 2021.

As part of its application, the company had to submit a cheque for $7,500 and a letter of credit for $200,000.

Principals also underwent credit and criminal background checks, which were satisfactory.

Who's involved with the company?

Roswall told regulators that its executive and management have been at "the forefront of renewable energy development in Nova Scotia over the past 15 years."

In addition to Samson, other directors on the numbered company board include:

  • Barbara Pike, a member of the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board and former CEO of the Maritimes Energy Association.
     
  • David Howell, president of Valley Homes and chief financial officer of Brison Developments Ltd.

Roswall's board members include:

  • Edgar Samson of Premium Seafoods.
     
  • Veteran utilities executive Ray Robinson, formerly of Emera.
     
  • Energy efficiency expert Dale Robertson.

Roscoe sits on the boards of both companies.

 

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op2bmd-XXHc&ab_channel=MaritimeMalaise

 


 

Hey Former Attorney General Mikey Murphy say Hoka Hey to TJ Burke and the RCMP

822 views
Oct 17, 2010
52 subscribers

From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Mr Spurr here is the reason that I told you the story about
the RCMP, CTV, CBC, Youtube, BCE and Alliant
To: robert.hanf@emera.com, "James.Spurr"<James.Spurr@emera.com>,
"david.rodenhiser"<david.rodenhiser@nspower.ca>
Cc: shelley.black@enbridge.com, info@northerngateway.ca,
 info@pipeupagainstenbridge.ca, jolan@forestethics.orginfo@cupe.bc.ca
info@pacificwild.org, Jessica.Wilson@greenpeace.org
Received: Sunday, October 17, 2010, 10:34 PM 
 
I did try hard to talk to you last fall. Ask David Rodenhiser. That
said I think you Emera dudes are crazy not to at least try to settle
with me before I decided to raise the stakes in your wicked game.
Please don't think me dumb I saw you checking me out whilst we talked
and I could tell that you believed every word I said.

FYI the reason I was so pissed off was a few days earlier a host of
very corrupt cops in seven cars pounced my son and I at 2:30 in the
morning right after the David Alward and the PCs won their big
mandate. As you can see I have reloaded some of my old videos that
were maliciously deleted just as the writ was dropped. Surf through
and you will see your face Mr Spurr You seemed like an ok guy on the
phone but so did the former Attorney General Mikey Murphy before he
and his pals sent all the corrupt cops to attack me. If nothing you
should deny that we talked on the 6th and that quite some time before
I opted to upload a video about you Ermera dudes again and reintroduce
myself to big talking activists in BC.
 
 
Just Dave 
By Location Visit Detail 
Visit 12,074 
Domain Name smartmeter.com ? (Commercial) 
 IP Address 142.67.28.# (Nova Scotia Power) 
ISP Nova Scotia Power 
Location Continent : North America 
Country : Canada (Facts) 
State/Region : Nova Scotia 
City : Halifax 
Lat/Long : 44.65, -63.6 (Map) 
Language English (U.S.) en-us 
Operating System Microsoft WinXP Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; MS-RTC LM 8; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) Javascript version 1.3 
Monitor Resolution : 1920 x 1080 
Color Depth : 32 bits 
 Time of Visit Oct 6 2010 3:05:39 pm 
 Last Page View Oct 6 2010 3:08:13 pm 
Visit Length 2 minutes 34 seconds 
Page Views 2 Referring URL http://www.bing.com/... nb&src=IE-SearchBox 
Search Engine bing.com Search Words david amos nb 
Out Click View my complete profile http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915... 
Time Zone UTC-4:00 Visitor's Time Oct 6 2010 3:05:39 pm 
Visit Number 12,074 
 
From: Redden, Zeda 
To: David Amos 
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 12:43 AM 
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Yo George Cope I am still very curious if the lawyers Fred Crooks and Maritine Turcotte have learned the meaning of the word INTEGRITY yet? 
 
Vacation Alert
 
******** 
 
I will be out of the office from Monday June 21 until Wednesday June 23 with limited access to voice mail or email during this time. For investor services inquiries please contact Tanya Murphy at 1-877-248-3113. For general inquiries please contact my assistant, Lisa Prevost as 902-487-7981. 
 
Best regards, 
Zeda Redden 
 
Subject: 
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 
From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)" MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca 
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com 
 
January 30, 2007 
 
WITHOUT PREJUDICE 
 
Mr. David Amos 
 
 Dear Mr. Amos: 
 
This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton. 
 
Sincerely, 
 
Honourable Michael B. Murphy Minister of Health

 

 

https://nsuarb.novascotia.ca/about/member-biographies 

 

 

Disponible en français

Peter W. Gurnham, Q.C.

 

Mr. Gurnham was appointed as a Member of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board on June 5, 2003 and then as Chair on October 23, 2004.

Mr. Gurnham holds bachelor's degrees in Economics and Law from Dalhousie University in Halifax and was appointed as a Queen's Counsel in 1998. Prior to his appointment to the Board, he practiced law with Cox Hanson O'Reilly Matheson, where he specialized in administrative and regulatory law, and was managing partner of the firm for nine years. He is a past Chairman of the Nova Scotia Elections Commission, has served in a number of senior positions with Scouts Canada, is Past Chair of Symphony Nova Scotia, Past Chair of the Finance Committee, Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society, and has been involved in a number of other community and charitable groups. He is a recipient of several awards in recognition of service to community.

Mr. Gurnham is a member of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society, the Canadian Bar Association, the National Association of the Regulatory Utility Commissioners (US), and is Past Chair of CAMPUT: Canada’s Energy and Utility Regulators. He is a former Co-Chair of the annual Energy Regulation Course sponsored by CAMPUT at Queens University.

Roland A. Deveau, Q.C.

 

Roland Deveau was appointed as a Member of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in December, 1998 and named as Vice Chair on August 20, 2012.

Before joining the Board, Mr. Deveau practiced law with the firm of Pink, Macdonald, Harding in Yarmouth and Pointe de L'Église, Nova Scotia, where his preferred areas of practice were municipal, administrative and commercial law. He was also involved in various community economic development initiatives, including serving as President of the local Chamber of Commerce.

Mr. Deveau is a Past President of the provincial association of French speaking lawyers, as well as a former director and officer of the national “Fédération canadienne des juristes d'expression francaise de common law". He has also served on Bar Council of the Barristers' Society. In 2016 and 2017, he served as President of Golf Canada (the sport's governing body in Canada), and has chaired its Audit and Risk and Compensation Committees. He was Canada’s representative on the R&A Amateur Status Committee in St. Andrews, Scotland from 2014 to 2016. He is a nationally certified golf rules official who has officiated in both provincial and national amateur and professional golf championships, including the PGA Tour.

He holds a Bachelor of Law and a Bachelor of Science (Chemistry) from Dalhousie University and received his Queens Counsel (Q.C.) designation in 2010. He is a member of CAMPUT: Canada’s Energy and Utility Regulators, the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (US), the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society and the Canadian Bar Association.

David J. Almon, LL.B.

 

David Almon was appointed as a Member of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in 1998.

Before joining the Board, Mr. Almon held a consulting position with the Department of Energy Mines and Resources Canada in Ottawa, monitoring, from Committee through to passage in Parliament, the framework of legislative initiatives constituting the National Energy Program (1982-84), served as Parliamentary Assistant in the House of Commons, following which he joined Burke Mitton Thompson law firm in Halifax in 1984.

In addition to maintaining a private law practice, Mr. Almon has held additional consulting positions with the Department of Foreign Affairs, involved with the planning and administrative arrangements for the Halifax Summit (G-7) and Fifth Economic Leaders Meeting - Vancouver (APEC) as well as presiding as Chair of the Nova Scotia Criminal Review Board. He has served on the Dalhousie University Board of Governors and Alumni Association and Legal Ethics Committee of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society.

Mr. Almon, who was born in Halifax, holds degrees in Political Science, Education and Law and is a Member of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society, The Canadian Bar Association, CAMPUT: Canada’s Energy and Utility Regulators and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (US).

Roberta J. Clarke, Q.C.

 

Roberta Clarke, appointed as a Member of the Board in July, 2009, previously practiced law for thirty-two years with Blois, Nickerson & Bryson in Halifax.

Born and educated in St. John's, Newfoundland, Ms. Clarke received a B.A. from Memorial University of Newfoundland (1973, University Gold Medalist, Political Science). After receiving her LL.B. from Dalhousie University (1976), she was called to the Bars of Newfoundland (1976) and Nova Scotia (1977).

Ms. Clarke has served as Referee under the Civil Procedure Rules, Member of the Regional Assessment Appeal Court, Member of the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Dispute Advisory Panel, and Vice-Chair of the Provincial Appeal Board under the Health Authorities Act. She has been active in various professional organizations in both leadership and education roles, and in public and community service, including Advisory Groups of the Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia, Capital District Health Authority Research Ethics Board, Pine Hill Divinity Hall, and Atlantic School of Theology. Ms. Clarke was appointed Queen's Counsel in 1997. In 2003, she was the first female recipient of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society Distinguished Service Award.

Ms. Clarke is a member of the Nova Scotia Barristers' Society, the Canadian Bar Association, the Canadian Association of Members of Public Utility Tribunals, and the National Association of Regulators of Utility Commissioners (US). She is currently a member of the CAMPUT Education Committee.

Richard J. Melanson, LL.B.

Originally from Corberrie, Nova Scotia, before joining the Board, Mr. Melanson practiced law in Halifax for 27 years with Blois Nickerson and Bryson LLP. He had extensive experience in administrative law, having acted as an outside counsel to the Board for over twenty years and acted for or appeared before various other administrative tribunals and agencies. He also practiced in the areas of corporate-commercial law, real property transactions, bankruptcy and insolvency and civil litigation. He was involved in the firm’s management, chairing the firm’s articling committee, together with sitting on the firm’s partnership and associates compensation committees.

Mr. Melanson received his Bachelor of Arts (French major-1981) and Bachelor of Education (1983) from Université Sainte-Anne. He is a graduate of Dalhousie Law School, receiving the University Medal in 1988, awarded to the student who achieved the highest average of those obtaining first class distinction in third year studies. He was admitted to the Nova Scotia Bar in 1989.

Mr. Melanson has been an active volunteer in the legal community, including sitting as a Commissioner on the Law Reform Commission of Nova Scotia and the Board of Directors of the provincial association of French speaking lawyers. He has also served as a volunteer with various professional and civic organizations, including chairing the discipline committee as a member of the Board of Examiners of the Nova Scotia Association of Social Workers and holding the position of treasurer with Canadian Parents For French (Nova Scotia).

He is a member of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society, the Canadian Bar Association, CAMPUT: Canada’s Energy and Utility Regulators, and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (US).

Steven Murphy, MBA, P.Eng.

Prior to joining the Board, Mr. Murphy worked for 28 years in the Engineering Consulting Industry. He previously worked for WSP Canada and AECOM Canada Ltd., where he served as Senior Manager for Atlantic Canada for both firms. He also worked for CBCL Limited as the Manager of the Municipal Engineering Department, as well as a Senior Project Manager. The primary areas of his engineering practice were water, wastewater and municipal infrastructure projects, providing him the opportunity to work with a number of Municipalities and Utilities throughout Atlantic Canada.

Mr. Murphy holds a Diploma in Engineering from Dalhousie University, a Bachelor of Civil Engineering from Technical University of Nova Scotia, and a Masters of Business Administration from Dalhousie University. He has been a registered professional engineer with Engineers Nova Scotia since 1990. In 2003, he was presented with the Citizenship Award from Engineers Nova Scotia. He is also a past member of the Atlantic Canada Water and Waste Water Association Scholarship Review Committee, the American Water Works Association, and the American Public Works Association.

Mr. Murphy has also demonstrated professional and community service involvement. On the professional side, he is a former member of the Board of Directors of the Consulting Engineers of Nova Scotia and Dalhousie Engineering Alumni Association. On the community side, he served as Chair of the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) Downtown Design Review Committee. He is also an Associate Member and Past National Vice-President of the Canadian Progress Club, where he was presented with a Canadian Progress Club National Member of the Year Award in 2009.

He is a member of CAMPUT: Canada’s Energy and Utility Regulators, and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (US).

Stephen McGrath, LL.B.

 

Before joining the Board, Mr. McGrath was a Director of Legal Services with the Nova Scotia Department of Justice, with shared responsibility for the management of legal services for departments and agencies throughout the provincial government. Mr. McGrath was with the Department of Justice for 16 years, and before assuming his role as director, held various positions in the Legal Services Division. His work included advice to the Nova Scotia Department of Energy and appearances before courts and administrative bodies on behalf of numerous departments and agencies of the Government of Nova Scotia. Mr. McGrath was awarded the Premier’s Award of Excellence in 2009 for his work to determine the methodology for Crown Share Adjustment Payments to the Province of Nova Scotia under the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord. Before joining the Province, Mr. McGrath was a partner with the Dartmouth, Nova Scotia law firm, Boyne Clarke. During his 10 years there, his practice focused on commercial litigation and environmental law.

Mr. McGrath was a member and past chair of the Board of Directors of the Regional Residential Services Society and was a former member of the Board of Directors of the Help Line Society. He has also been a volunteer coach with minor hockey.

Mr. McGrath is a member of the Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society. He was formerly a Council Member of the Society, is a past chair of the Society’s Code of Professional Conduct Committee and a member of the Ethics Advisory Committee. He is a member of the Canadian Bar Association and was previously a Member of the Executive and Council Member with the Association, and past chair of the Young Lawyers and Civil Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution Sections of the Association. He is also a member of CAMPUT: Canada’s Energy and Utility Regulators and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (US).

Jennifer Nicholson, CPA, CA

 

Jennifer Nicholson was appointed as a Member of the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board in April 2018.  Jennifer is a graduate of Saint Mary’s University and in 1997 qualified as a Chartered Accountant (now a Chartered Professional Accountant).  She qualified with Ernst & Young and following that has held a number of positions.  She was Senior Director Stakeholder Relations for Emera from 2006 to 2010.  Following that, she was Executive Vice President and Vice President Investor Relations with Brigus Gold.  She was CFO and Director of Risk, Environment, Social and Governance for Halterm and prior to being appointed to the Board was a partner in Executive Finance Partners Inc. which, among other things, provided courses in Ethical Intelligence, Board Governance and Executive Presence and provided CFO for hire services for small and medium sized businesses.  For a number of years she was a lecturer at Saint Mary’s University and an instructor at the Atlantic School of Chartered Accountancy.  Among Jennifer’s volunteer activities are Board Chair of the Blue Nose Marathon, member of the Saint Mary’s University Board of Governors, Treasurer and Secretary of CAMPUT, past Council member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, Treasurer of Canadian Martyrs Minor Basketball and a number of other community and charitable organizations.

 

 

Disponible en français

Mission

To fairly and independently resolve matters in an efficient and effective manner.

Vision

To be widely recognized as a trusted, leading adjudicative and regulatory tribunal.

Values

We are:

  • Ethical and act with integrity
  • Respectful
  • Responsive, dedicated, and knowledgeable

The way we operate is:

  • Fair and independent
  • Accessible and accountable
  • Efficient and cost effective

Our communication with our stakeholders, the public and each other is:

  • Timely and understandable
  • Open and transparent
  • Respectful and courteous

Our decisions are:

  • Impartial and objective
  • Consistent and timely
  • Well-reasoned and easily understood

Our workplace is:

  • Professional and team oriented
  • Collaborative and collegial
  • Committed to delivering high quality services

 

Copies of the Board's current and past Strategic Plans are available on our Plans & Reports page.

 

Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board
3rd Floor, Summit Place
1601 Lower Water Street
Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3P6

Telephone: (902) 424-4448
Toll Free: 1-855-442-4448
Fax: (902) 424-3919
Email: board@novascotia.ca

 

https://www.roswall.ca/who-we-are

 

Who We Are


Based in Halifax, Nova Scotia in Canada, the people leading Roswall Development have been on the front lines of the significant energy transition that has taken place in Nova Scotia over the past decade. Collectively, we have successfully built and operated $150 million (CAD) of wind and solar projects and have extensive involvement in renovating public infrastructure.

Through our combined experience, we have completed energy efficiency retrofits of over 100 public buildings and installed onsite renewable energy systems at over 1,000 locations, helping to save hundreds of millions of dollars in energy costs.

12_Men holding metal.jpg 


"We are proud to have played significant roles in the Nova Scotia Community Feed-in Tariff program that built over 200MW of locally owned renewable energy projects, the Solar City Halifax program that installed solar at thousands of homes, and the Town of Bridgewater's Smart Cities Challenge award win."

— Daniel Roscoe, P.Eng, Managing Director

Board of Directors

Daniel Roscoe, P.Eng
PARTNER AND Managing Director

Daniel Roscoe is a veteran renewable energy executive with extensive experience in all stages of wind and solar project development, financing, construction, and operation. He has built wind energy projects across North America, with a focus on Atlantic Canada and New England, along with hundreds of on-site solar projects. Daniel’s specialty is making small scale utility projects be as profitable as possible.

As a passionate advocate and engaged stakeholder for locally-owned renewable energy and for transition to a sustainable energy economy, Daniel has successfully advocated for innovative energy policies including the Nova Scotia Community Feed-in Tariff program and Solar City Halifax. These programs and the resulting projects played a major role in transforming the Nova Scotia electricity supply from 2008-2016.

Daniel is a Professional Engineer in Nova Scotia with a Bachelor of Applied Science (Civil Engineering) from the University of Waterloo. He is the former chief operating officer of Scotian WindFields Inc. and SWEB Development LP.

Hon. Michel Samson, BA, LLB, ECNS
BOARD CHAIR

Michel Samson is a counsel at Cox & Palmer and previously spent 19 years as a Member of the Nova Scotia Legislature, which included a period as Minister of Energy.

David Howell, CPA, CMA
HEAD OF FINANCE

David Howell is the president of New Valley Homes Inc. and the chief financial officer of Brison Developments Ltd. He is on the Board of four Nova Scotian renewable energy companies and was the lead at SWEB Development LP for project financing for Nova Scotia.

Mitch Underhay, BCom (H)
DEVELOPMENT MANAGER

Mitch Underhay has worked directly to install 25 wind turbines over 13 projects sites in ten jurisdictions in the United States and Canada. During that time, he managed relations with landowners, municipalities, the province/state, local first nations, local utilities and system operators.

Dale Robertson, P.Eng
DIRECTOR

Dale Robertson is an award-winning energy efficiency expert whose work has been international in scope and includes projects on five continents since 1981 leading to hundreds of millions of dollars in reduced energy consumption. He was the leader of an engineering study team performing energy audits in over 800 buildings and facilities of virtually every nature - residential, commercial, industrial, manufacturing, processing, agriculture, government, hospitality and education.

Ray Robinson, P.Eng
DIRECTOR

Ray Robinson is the chief executive officer of Saint John Energy and board member/past chair of the Canadian Electricity Association. He is the former chief operating officer of Emera Caribbean and held many other utility executive positions.

Barbara Pike, BCom
DIRECTOR

Barbara Pike is a member of the Canada Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board and former founding chief executive officer of the Maritime Energy Association. She sits on the Boards of three renewable energy companies and has 20 years of experience in the energy sector.

Edgar Samson
DIRECTOR

Edgar Samson is the President and CEO of Premium Seafoods Ltd and sits on the Board of Directors for a number of community organizations. He is a native of Petit De Grat, Nova Scotia and a graduate of the Nova Scotia Institute of Technology’s electrician program. In the spring of 1984, Edgar, along with partners John Samson and Brian Samson, established Premium Seafoods, a lobster brokerage business. Over the last 33 years, Premium Seafoods has experienced several expansions and continues to grow. Edgar is presently a co-owner/director of several companies, which employ over 200 people in rural Cape Breton.

 

 

397 Bedford Highway
Halifax, Nova Scotia
B3M 2L3
Canada

info@roswall.ca

(902) 489-6787

 

https://www.brisondevelopments.com/about/management/

 

President/Owner

Mitch F Brison

Mitchell Brison

Mitch Brison
Cell: 1 (902) 798-6395
Fax: 1 (902) 798-8873
Email: mbrison@eastlink.ca

Controller

David F Howell

David Howell

Cell: 1 (902) 790-0111
Fax: 1 (902) 798-8873
Email: mbrison@eastlink.ca


https://www.linkedin.com/in/ray-robinson-6a49b2/?originalSubdomain=ca

 

Ray Robinson

Ray Robinson

President & CEO at Saint John Energy
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada Contact info
  • 500+ connections

About

Successful senior executive with more than 30 years’ experience in the electrical utility industry. Skilled in securing regulatory approval and permits for projects that span international borders. Proven ability to lead organizations through mergers and acquisitions to seamless, efficient operations. Track record of strategy development and implementation that results in innovative, customer-centered solutions and strong returns for shareholders.

Specialties: Operations turnaround, successful development of transmission line projects and power plants, project management.

  • Chomsky said "if people treasure their liberty so much, they should find a way to protect it and secure it for themselves"

    $
    0
    0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cc_neyVp-rI&ab_channel=PrimoRadical

     


    Noam Chomsky on Vaccine Mandates

    12,036 views
    Oct 24, 2021
    28.7K subscribers
    In this clip from his extremely controversial interview on PRIMO RADICAL #250, former MIT professor and esteemed political commentator Noam Chomsky discusses why he supports vaccine mandates.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzWcP2b4uZ4&ab_channel=PrimoRadical 

     


     

    PRIMO RADICAL #250: Noam Chomsky

    12,250 views
    Oct 23, 2021
    28.7K subscribers
    The living legend, former MIT linguistics professor and political commentator Noam Chomsky returns for this monumental 250th episode! In this interview, we discuss vaccination mandates, student loan debt, progressive media like The Young Turks (TYT), and the utility of voting for Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Chomsky also shares a Hollywood film that he enjoyed and responds to the question of what he would like to be remembered for.

     

     https://news.yahoo.com/noam-chomsky-unvaccinated-remove-themselves-171900487.html

     


    Noam Chomsky: Unvaccinated should 'remove themselves from the community,' access to food 'their problem'

     Philosopher Noam Chomsky argued that those who remain unvaccinated should be segregated, saying that obtaining food after they had "the decency to remove themselves from the community" was "their problem.

    After the left-wing linguist was asked what separation of the unvaccinated would look like on a practical level, Chomsky said the unvaccinated should remove themselves from the community for the safety of others and make arrangements to get food without coming into contact with others.

    Chomsky, 92, compared people who do not want to get vaccinated to those who do not want to stop at red lights in traffic, saying that if people treasure their liberty so much, they should "find a way to protect it and secure it for [themselves]."

    The linguist's remarks were met with mixed reactions on Twitter, with some supporting his calls for the unvaccinated to be isolated.


    Others accused him of being a socialist and slammed him as an "overrated babbling authoritarian mess."

    Chomsky's remarks on segregating the unvaccinated come after a growing number of businesses are requiring their workers to get vaccinated. About 1,900 state workers in Washington reportedly either resigned or were fired by Oct. 19, and Northwell Health in New York fired 1,400 employees on Oct. 4 for refusing the COVID-19 vaccine.

    While the left-wing philosopher has made headlines in the past for controversial remarks, such as calling for reparations for black people, he also signed an anti-cancel culture letter in July 2020 warning of an "intolerant climate" on "all sides."

    Washington Examiner Videos

    Tags:News, Noam Chomsky, Vaccination, Coronavirus, Food

    Original Author:Asher Notheis

    Original Location:Noam Chomsky: Unvaccinated should 'remove themselves from the community,' access to food 'their problem'

     

    Noam Chomsky says the "right response" to The Unvaccinated is "to insist that they be isolated" from society youtu.be/VX0hn6F-jsI?t=

    Noam Chomsky doubles down on his previous call for the state to segregate The Unvaccinated from society:
    "How can we get food to them? Well, that's actually their problem." via @PrimoRadicalyoutu.be/TzWcP2b4uZ4

     
    A

    "How can we get food to them?" Chomsky told YouTube's Primo Radical on Sunday. "Well, that's actually their problem."

    Noam Chomsky is correct #IsolateTheUnvaccinated
    PoliticsVideoChannel
    @politvidchannel
    Replying to @politvidchannel
    Noam Chomsky on the Unvaccinated: "insist that they be isolated" from society
    Embedded video


     

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JduPGFNwB7A&ab_channel=MITVideoProductions 

     


    Noam Chomsky - Foundations of World Order: the UN, World Bank, IMF & Decl. Human Rights 1999

    373,381 views
    Dec 6, 2018
    51.5K subscribers

     

     

     

    https://www.grahamdefense.org/20040320noam.htm


    Meeting with Noam Chomsky,
    Vancouver, B.C., March 20, 2004 *

    Noam Chomsky took time out of his tightly scheduled Vancouver tour to meet with John Graham and legal team to discuss the case. Chomsky was in town to speak at a mass rally to mark the one year anniversary of the invasion of Iraq by the U.S./U.K. coalition. Noam Chomsky also spoke at a sold-out fundraiser for NDP MP Svend Robinson, where Professor Chomsky mentioned that this is a very important case for Canadians to be concerned about.


    Left to right: Lyn Crompton, Noam Chomsky, Terry LaLiberte, John Graham


    High resolution version of the above photo suitable for printing: graham_chomsky.jpg (Size: 2.19 MB).


    * Photos by Joni Miller, courtesy of the John Graham Defense Committee.

     

     https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-ghost-of-the-lesbian-lawyer-janet.html

     

    September 1st, 2004

    Howard Rubin, Lyn Crompton                              Andy Scott                                           and Greg Delbigio                                               Minister of Indian Affairs                        c/o Terry LaLiberte,                                          61 Carleton Street                                   Barrister and Solicitor                                       Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2
    1190-605 Robson Street
    Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5J3 
     
                                        RE: Corruption
    Hoka Hey,
           Please find enclosed a copy of most of the material sent to two Lieutenant Governors and the Governor General. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court and a Minister in our government in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also enclosed a copy of a letter I composed months ago but never sent and some other information you may find interesting about the political scene in South Dakota.
               Leonard has been a political prisoner for far too long with Canadian assistance let us not allow history to repeat itself with John Graham.
             May I suggest that you all give my friend Barry Bachrach a call, drop my name and then look to the best interests of the people that you are employed to speak for. There is a strong possibility that my actions may embarrass you in the near future if you choose to ignore this letter. You are looking at just the tip of a very malevolent iceberg that we all know exists. No government is beyond reproach once the electorate has been properly informed. Conrad Black just proved to us all how bad things really are if anyone was paying attention.
                                                Cya’ll in CourtJ
                                                                          David R. Amos
                                                                          153 Alvin Ave.
                                                                          Milton MA. 02186

    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I, David R. Amos, of 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. on Sept 2nd, 2004, I delivered the enclosed material to the office of Andy Scott at 61 Carleton Street Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2 and by mail to Terry LaLiberte. 
    David R, Amos
    153 Alvin Ave.
    Milton, MA. 02186

     


    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent:Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:28 PM
    Subject:RE: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?
    SURE MENTION ME. CHAOMSKY IS PART OF THE FAKE LEFT. THEY ARE LOSERS.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
    Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:33 PM
    To: Bachrach, Barry A.
    Subject: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?

    This really pissed me off. I have long email exchanges with him and when he and Paul Saba spoke in Milton (I had served Saba the same stuff you got at the same time.) I gave the same stuff to Noam's help without a CD recording. The old bugger don't mind running off to Canada to rub elbows with other Canadians he finds newsworthy but won't even pick up the phone to call me. He sure can talk a good talk though. I even had a long talk with Graham's buddies. I guess it is time to write his lawyers a letter do you wish for me to mention you?
     
    ----- Original Message -----
    Sent:Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:05 PM
    Subject:Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?

    It seems that CSIS is messing with my mail
    Sent by last Thursday by Canada Post to RCMP General Counsel Liliana Longo c/o Ast. Commissioner Gerry Lynch in NFLD. I have now called NFLD and gave Gerry the tracking number and told him if he wants to read his mail he should send someone to find it. After all he is one of the second in Command of the RCMP and Longo is his lawyer.
    Canada Post won't say dick to me about it.
    To track and confirm delivery of your item, enter the Item number, Reference number, or Delivery Notification Card number in the corresponding field provided below, then click the Submit button.
    No records found for specified search criteria: 46227406901
    Sent US Mail Saturday in Beantown all it had to do was go about a half a mile to the Canadian Consulate.
    Obviously I informed them but the thing is they don't know who else I told. Kinda of a double check one by phone and one by email.
    Track & Confirm
    Shipment Details
    You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 5717

    Your item was forwarded to a different address at 2:22 pm on September 21, 2004 in BOSTON, MA 02108. This was because of forwarding instructions or because the address or ZIP Code on the label was incorrect. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.

    Here is what happened earlier:
    ACCEPTANCE, September 17, 2004, 10:30 pm, BOSTON, MA 02205
    Anyway it ain't no matter to me now Their mail is filed in court for the public to view. If they want to piss and moan about it they can argue me later in court.
    They are public servants they should read their god damned mail. The Postal Service has a little explaining to do anyway over the Attorney General Robb Quinan and his Mail fraud anyway. I will just and this shit to it. I knew old man Ronald Irwin would duck and run but arguing Longo should be fun,
    What I did in Norfolk Probate Court today was way beyond fun it went way better than I dreamed it could. October 1st should prove to be quite a hoot after meeting Angie in court today. I wonder if Longo is a pretty as she is. She looks good in her picture anyway I am certain that she is a damn sight smarter than Angie. Angie is so stupid I almost feel ashamed for making her show me her ass. (Not really I am an ass man)
    Now it appears all the Canadian Boobs have shown me their ass a well. Time to talk to the right Yankees just before the November Election and then head out as planned. i finally got the tape from the New Brunswick Police Commission and I will send a copy of it your way someday Byron. I made sure I mentioned you several times and showed them the documents but I didn't speak of what it was about but everybody will know they got something really kinda big. I did to protect ya buddy. I also mentioned Barry once. I hope Barry called you today. I know the FEDS are likely listening and reading our emails so I recorded it here to protect the both of you and Collen Rowley as well. I cannot afford the time
    to wait for her to retire she is more valuable to me as an honest lawyer within the FBI before the Yankee federal election, not afterwards.
    I also hear Jean and Joyse on the tape so it should protect their butts as well. I will order a copy of the Probate Court tape as soon as we can afford it. But it will likely be edited anyway
    From: "Bachrach, Barry A."
    To: 'moto maniac'
    Subject: RE: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron
    Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:49:51 -0400

    you got to be careful. just found out someone went out to pine ridege. totally disrupted a group of people trying to fight the corruption. guess what. bingo, his wife is an fbi agent. i smelled something and told them to find out. in the interim, the work was disrupted as planned.
     
     
    -----Original Message-----
    From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:47 PM
    To: Bachrach, Barry A.
    Subject: Fwd: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron

    Be careful Byron and I both think this lady is a FED in BC. He just spilled some beans to her on purpose.So that they will make a play against me on Oct 1st. You know what they say about keeping your friends close and your enemies closer. There is nothing wrong with my emails she just said that so that others won't read them.

    Byron Prior wrote:
    From: "Byron Prior"
    To:
    CC: "Lisa" , "moto maniac" ,
    "John Bjornstrom"
    Subject: FR: Byron RE; Mafia Boss visit, yesterday
    Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:14:13 -0230
    Yesterday I had the unpleasent presents of one of Eastern Canada's Top Mafia Bosses & Drug Lord, from Montreal, a Newfie, spend more than 2 hours in my home, inquiring what my intentions were with my WEB-Site & if any persons have made me any offers to get ride of my site. I told him only threats of charging me from the NFLD. Constabulary. His offer to me was to forget everything & come back to work for him, immediately, if I wish, drug mule. I said no thanks & told him my web site will be there until my last breath. His comment to me was, that may be so, and left my home. John, you have my association chart, he married the Mexican Girl who couldn't speak English, by Judge Lloyd Wicks, at the NFLD. Hotel. John, that list has been with, RCMP, NFLD. Const., CIA, FBI, since 2001, why is he still aloud to travel the world from South America to Qubec to NFLD. constantly, & not be bothered by anyone when they are all aware of what he does, is he really representing them & the MOB. I'm sure others in this group know exactly who I'm speaking about, how do you sleep at night? Should anything happen to me I told him & I tell you all, I won't go without a fight, I will inform as many public as I can & I have records hidden in several places & with many different people. What is most disapointing to me is how many foney & corrupt people are out there without consience. YES, I will stay a member of this group, as long as I feel there is 1 honest person here. 34 years a MULE & for that now I call myself a JACKASS. If you have to run drugs for kids, it's better not to survive.
    Byron David Prior
    66 Readers Hill Crescent
    Conception Bay South
    A1W5B4
    709 834 9822
     

     

     

     

    Hartland liquor outlet dispute headed to court

    $
    0
    0

     Deja Vu or What???


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/review-of-nb-liquor-s-conduct-in-hanwell-agency-store-dispute-sought-1.2688373

     

     

    Review of NB Liquor's conduct in Hanwell agency store dispute sought

    Chris Scholten, owner of Scholten’s Convenience Store, calls for independent review of selection process

    The owner of a convenience store in Hanwell is calling for an independent review of how NB Liquor handled the awarding of an agency store franchise in the community, located near Fredericton.

    Chris Scholten, of Scholten’s Convenience Store, says there are still too many unanswered questions about NB Liquor's original decision to award the contract to Moncton-based Power Plus Technology Inc.

    A Court of Queen's Bench judge recently quashed the decision after Scholten, whose bid for the agency store had been rejected, sought a judicial review.

    Justice Paulette Garnett ruled in May NB Liquor's review procedure for those contesting a decision is "inadequate and unfair."

    Earlier this month, NB Liquor CEO Brian Harriman told CBC News a new request for proposals is in the works and he hopes a new contract for a Hanwell agency store will be awarded by late this summer.

    But Scholten wants a full review of what happened before NB Liquor proceeds. He has sent a letter to Harriman, urging him to order an independent review.

    “Even after 16 months of litigation, we still don’t have all the information as to how this went as wrong as it did. The people of this community still have more questions than answers about this," he said in a statement on Thursday.

    “In the interest of fairness, I think it is best at this point to wait to find out what an independent review reveals,” Scholten said. “I think the whole process has called the credibility of NB Liquor into question, certainly in this community. That has to be repaired I think before we can proceed here.”

    Scholten is questioning the "conduct" of NB Liquor, its former president Daniel Allain, and Hudson Creative Design of Moncton, the company contracted by the Crown corporation to help choose the winning bidder.

    “An independent review of this matter can ensure the same mistakes are not made again,” he said. “We don’t want to end up in the same place again, 18 months from now."

     

    Related Stories

     

     

     ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 03:21:35 +0000
    Subject: RE: Mr Marcoux We just talked about your CFO Mr Chase and
    Higgy etc Well here is a little Deja Vu for you from 5 years ago You
    really should ask the Feds what happened next
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:

    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>

     ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 00:19:30 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Mr Marcoux We just talked about your CFO Mr Chase and
    Higgy etc Well here is a little Deja Vu for you from 5 years ago You
    really should ask the Feds what happened next
    To: pcook@valleyequipment.ca, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
    "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
    < blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>
    Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/hartland-liquor-store-move-1.6229395

     

    Hartland liquor outlet dispute headed to court

    'Manipulation' or 'pure incompetence' alleged in agency store move out of downtown

    "Traffic volumes observed in January are typically less than during other months of the year, especially compared to the summer months," wrote Brendan McPhee of CBCL Ltd., the engineering consulting company that conducted the Hartland traffic count.

    "This would be especially true as Hartland is home to the World's Longest Covered Bridge, which is a well-known tourist attraction."

    A dispute over the awarding of the N.B. Liquor agency outlet in Hartland is headed to court next month, with duelling traffic counts likely to be the central issue.

    In April, N.B. Liquor moved its lucrative agency franchise from a traditional spot near Hartland's famed covered bridge to the local Hartland Irving station and Valu Foods outlet, about one kilometre upriver.   

    The move triggered opposition in the town and accusations by Peter Cook, the owner of the Freshmart grocery store that lost the outlet, of political manoeuvres and corporate cronyism.

    Cook, a prominent Liberal in Carleton County, had the franchise but lost a competition to keep it after N.B. Liquor put the contract up for open bidding.  

     

    Peter Cook (holding scissors) is seen at a ribbon-cutting ceremony in 2016. Cook is suing N.B. Liquor for the way it handled his bid to retain the liquor outlet at his grocery store in downtown Hartland. (Facebook)

    Cook disputes bid count

    A 100-point score card N.B. Liquor used to grade two bids it received appeared to show Cook was beaten easily, 96.1 to 88.25.

    Cook disputes that count and believes N.B. Liquor's politically appointed board of directors, headed by prominent Progressive Conservative and one-time Irving Oil employee John Correia, played a role in the outcome.

    "It was either manipulated on purpose, which I believe, or if nothing else, it's pure incompetence," Cook said this week.

    "I was cheated." 

    N.B. Liquor has declined to comment publicly on the dispute, but in an affidavit filed with the Court of Queen's Bench vice-president Alan Sullivan said Correia had no involvement in the evaluation process and his past associations are irrelevant to Cook's losing the bid.

    "Mr. Correia's previous or current roles with ANBL or other companies had no effect on the fact the Applicant scored lower in the RFP process than Valu Foods," Sullivan's affidavit said.

     

    John Correia was appointed chair of NB Liquor by the Higgs government and was an early backer of Higgs leadership bid. NB Liquor denies he exerted any influence on the decision to move the Hartland outlet. (Coast Tire)



    Traffic count most contentious issue

    A number of issues are disputed by Cook in N.B. Liquor's scoring of the two bids, but a traffic count that was worth 30 points in the competition – more than any other element – has emerged as the most contentious.

    N.B. Liquor's traffic study was conducted over 48 hours on a Tuesday and Wednesday during the second week of January this year, and showed vehicles passing the Irving station to be within 95 per cent of the number going past Cook's store.  

    Cook disputes that count because his store can be reached by multiple streets running in front of and behind his building, and because traffic was measured on only one street.

    Although N.B. Liquor's request for proposals says scoring of the traffic count will be "based on vehicle traffic going past the proponents place of business," correspondence filed in court shows the consultant believed the job was to measure only traffic travelling on Main Street.

    "We understand the main objective is to obtain a comparison between the daily Main Street traffic volumes," wrote Mark MacDonald, CBCL's senior transportation engineer.

    Cook said beyond that issue, summer traffic in downtown Hartland is much higher than in winter and the selection of two mid-week days in January to do a study guaranteed a flawed result.

    To make that point, Cook hired Roy Consultants of Moncton, a frequent engineering contractor to the New Brunswick department of transportation and infrastructure, to conduct a second traffic study over five days in mid-August.   

    Hartland's Irving station and Valufoods outlet at the edge of town was declared the winner of N.B. Liquor's agency store contract on March 17. It took over on April 1. (Google Streetview)

    Second study conducted in mid-August

    That study, authored by civil engineer Jérémie Aubé, counted 29 per cent more vehicles passing in front of Cook's location on Main Street than the Irving location, using counters in similar locations to N.B. Liquor's count.  

    But the difference jumped to 111 per cent more passing near Cook's store by adding in a count of cars using a second route.

    In his report, Aubé conceded that counting traffic is not a perfect science.  

    "The data area is not perfectly sealed, and vehicles may enter and exit the system freely without being captured by traffic counting devices," he wrote.

    Cook has softened one claim made in an early affidavit: the street in front his store was blocked for a time by roadwork while N.B. Liquor's traffic count was underway.  

    He concedes now that he had the dates of the traffic count wrong.

    On its scorecard, N.B. Liquor graded the traffic count 30 to 28.6 in Cook's favour because of the slight difference in its numbers.

    Cook feels his study shows the traffic score should have been at worst 30 to 15 in his favour, more than enough to merit his overall bid winning, his bid scored 9 points lower on the rest of the elements.

    "I feel we have a chance, and a good chance, that a judge could overrule it," he said.

    Both sides are scheduled to be in court in Fredericton on Nov. 9.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Robert Jones

    Reporter

    Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 02:38:29 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Mr Marcoux We just talked about your CFO Mr Chase and
    Higgy etc Well here is a little Deja Vu for you from 5 years ago You
    really should ask the Feds what happened next
    To: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>



    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nbliquor-new-brunswick-hartland-irving-1.5984665
     

    Political interference alleged after Hartland liquor outlet moved to Irving station

    NB Liquor board approves moving outlet to edge of Hartland, despite objections from town and employers

    Transferring the outlet triggered objections by the town itself and two of its largest employers.

    But even with evidence of a botched traffic count contaminating the decision, efforts to have Premier Blaine Higgs intervene and cancel the move fell flat.

    "The Town of Hartland feels the decision is detrimental to our ongoing efforts to improve and increase our town economy on all fronts," wrote Hartland's chief administrative officer David Hutten in a March letter to Higgs asking him to stop the relocation of the liquor outlet away from the bridge.

    "It is imperative that we continue to grow our municipal downtown core and not strip it bare of essential and leisure provisions," argued Hutten.

    It's the first time a successful operator of an NB Liquor agency store has had their contract moved to a competitor since the program began in 1991 but last minute appeals to the province to halt the switch failed and the change went ahead April 1.

    Liquor store long been downtown

    Hartland has had a liquor outlet in its downtown core since 1986.

    It was first installed during the government of former Progressive Conservative Premier Richard Hatfield, Hartland's MLA at the time, as part of the community's reconstruction following a major fire that destroyed several downtown buildings in 1980.

    The outlet has occupied different locations over 35 years but always within steps of the Hartland Covered Bridge, a recognized national historic site as the longest bridge of its kind in the world.

    The structure is a tourist magnet in the town and celebrates its 100th anniversary this year.

    Freshmart sits across from the entrance to the Hartland Covered Bridge. (Google Street view)

    Until this month NB Liquor's outlet had been located across the street from the entrance to the bridge inside a local grocery store called the Hartland Freshmart.

    Last year Freshmart recorded $1.5 million in alcohol sales, placing in it the top third of outlets in NB Liquor's agency network. 

    Freshmart assumed control of the Hartland contract in 2019 after its owner, Peter Cook, bought a nearby convenience store that had owned the licence since the mid 1990s.

    But Cook is also a prominent Liberal and, coincidentally or not, when Freshmart's liquor contract came up for renewal this year, NB Liquor said it found a better arrangement.

    In what the Crown corporation insists was an impartial evaluation of bids it received following a request for proposals, the local Hartland Irving station and Valu Foods outlet, about one kilometre upriver from the covered bridge, was selected as the new location for the lucrative outlet.

    "We wish to advise you that your application for the Agency appointment was unsuccessful," NB Liquor's Bonnie Harnish wrote to the Freshmart on March 17.

    "Please take assurance in knowing the decision was made following the results of a prescribed and unbiased process."

    Retailer questions decision's fairness

    Cook, who ran as a Liberal in the 2010 provincial election and is related by marriage to former Liberal MLAs Fred and Andrew Harvey, does not accept he was dealt with fairly.

    On March 26, he filed an application with the Court of Queen's Bench in Fredericton to review the decision, alleging that irregularities in how bids were scored unfairly steered the contract to the local Irving station.

    "Favouring business because they are associated with Irving is improper," Cook said in a sworn affidavit filed with his court application.

    Cook is suspicious because the final decision on moving the Hartland location was made by NB Liquor's board of directors, which is chaired by John Correia.

    Correia is a former head fundraiser for the New Brunswick Progressive Conservative Party and, like Higgs, a former  employee of Irving Oil.

    John Correia was appointed chair of NB Liquor by the Blaine Higgs government. He was an early backer of Higgs's leadership bid and is a former head of the PC Party's fundraising team. Correia spent much of his working career with Irving Oil and Irving-owned Maritime Tire and is now vice-president of Coast Tire. (Coast Tire)

    In his affidavit, Cook claims the scoring of proposed outlet locations was "politically motivated" and ultimately unfair to  his bid because of his own party activity and a favouritism NB Liquor has for outlets branded as Irving stations.

    "There appears to be an ongoing trend such that [NB Liquor] is awarding more and more agency store contracts to retailers who are working with Irving and who purchase and sell Irving gasoline," Cook said in his affidavit in an apparent reference to the Irving station in Plaster Rock winning an outlet last year.

    NB Liquor denies that accusation.

    In an email, spokesperson Thomas Tremblay said the Hartland contract was awarded in a standard way following an "unbiased" 100-point evaluation NB Liquor conducts every time it decides where to place an outlet among competing bidders.

    The scoring system gives points based on a variety of easily measured factors, including shelf and floor space and cooler size available for selling alcohol (20 points) hours of operation (10 points), and available parking (four points).

    Credit is also given if the location sells lottery tickets (one point), coffee (one point) or fast food (one point).

    The scorecard does favour bids connected to oil companies, but not specifically Irving. It awards two points if gasoline is sold onsite, which can be significant in a close contest.

    A flawed traffic count?

    However, the single most important element, worth 30 points, is a traffic count conducted at each location, which appeared to be mishandled by NB Liquor in a way that undermined Freshmart's bid.

    Cook claims that intentionally or by accident the count was done over five days in February exactly as the town dug up the road in front of his store to upgrade local sewer lines, guaranteeing a poor result for his store.

    Peter Cook (holding scissors) is involved in several New Brunswick businesses. He is suing NB Liquor for the way it handled his bid to retain the liquor outlet at his grocery store in downtown Hartland. (Facebook)

    "The traffic counter was placed on a road that was closed for construction to all vehicles save for transport trucks for two days out of four and a half or five days [NB Liquor] ran the traffic count study," Cook said in his affadavit.

    "Vehicles were redirected in such a way that they did not pass through the traffic counter."

    Hutten, the town administrator, confirmed that account.

    "The municipality wasn't informed this counting would be happening, so without being aware of that we had that road closed down for two days of the actual car-counting process," said Hutten.

    "It was closed for a day and overnight and most of the second day."

    Town of Hartland administrator David Hutten wrote a letter to Premier Blaine Higgs on behalf of the community, calling the decision to move the local liquor outlet away from the downtown 'detrimental' and asking for it to be reversed. (LinkedIn)

    Cook said he called NB Liquor to alert them to the problem but was told he could not make contact during the evaluation process.

    He said NB Liquor did not include alternative downtown routes to his store, on Orser, Brighton and Queen streets, in its traffic count.

    "If we lost fair and square then that's what it would be," Cook said in an interview. "But it's too obvious [we didn't]. It's ridiculous."

    NB Liquor mum on traffic count results

    Tom Tremblay said NB Liquor chair Correia was not available to be interviewed about what happened in Hartland, but according to the corporation's scoring system, every vehicle missed in its traffic survey matters.

    A bidder with 25 per cent more cars recorded in the survey than a competitor receives six more points in the evaluation. A traffic count that is twice as high as a competitor is worth a 15-point advantage.

    NB Liquor will not disclose what its traffic count in Hartland was or how many points each bidder received, only that on the final scorecard, the Irving location came out ahead.

    "Your submission met the mandatory requirements," Bonnie Harnish wrote in her letter to the Freshmart. "However, the total score did not yield the highest score."

    Tremblay acknowledged what happened in Hartland is unusual.

    Since agency outlets were first introduced by NB Liquor in 1991, dozens of existing operators in good standing have won hundreds of renewals. Not a single one has lost its contract in a request-for-proposals procedure other than the Hartland Freshmart.

    "Any examples of a change as you describe have typically been related to a business closure or other specific cause," wrote Tremblay.

    "We don't have an example of a change of award based solely on scoring in our current records."

    Others worry about impact on downtown

    Cook is fighting NB Liquor's decision but he's not the only one in Hartland upset by what happened.

    Kevin Chase with Day & Ross and Ben Craig of Craig Manufacturing, two of Hartland's largest employers, both wrote to the province to object to the decision, as did David Hutten on behalf of the town.

    "I am sure it seems like a small thing just moving the store a few clicks down the road, but I really believe this decision will have big repercussions on all of us in Hartland," Craig wrote in his letter to local PC MLA Bill Hogan.

    "We truly believe that towns without a downtown are less attractive places to live. We currently have dozens of open jobs we can't fill, as attracting talent to work in and live in Hartland is already a real challenge."

    In reply, Hogan sounded sympathetic but said there was nothing he could do.

    "I have fully investigated this decision and have had several discussions with the Chair of NB Liquor, unfortunately the process that they have in place was followed and a decision was rendered. I have exhausted all the avenues available to me."

    Chase, who is chief financial officer at Day & Ross, made his appeal directly to Higgs without success.

    "Attracting talent to our area is sometimes difficult, and one of the things we have found is is that employees want to work where it is convenient for them to have access to goods and services," wrote Chase.

    "We ask that you review and reverse this decision and leave the agency liquor outlet within the Hartland downtown core."

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Robert Jones

    Reporter

    Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    Luc C. Marcoux
    Called to the bar: 1996 (ON); 1996 (NB); Q.C.2016 (NB)
    McCain Foods Limited
    8800 Main St.
    Florenceville-Bristol, New Brunswick E7L 1B2
    Phone: 506-375-5353
    Fax: 506-375-5058
    Email: lcmarcou@mccain.ca

    Peter Cook 506-375-6726 pcook@valleyequipment.ca.

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 08:39:03 -0400
    Subject: Yo Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" This is the document
    your lawyer Jan Jensen is responding to that The Federal Court of
    Appeal has yet to file I name ALL the Judges in my next lawsuit
    To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
    < hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"
    < Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca

    >, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, oldmaison
    < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, george.filliter@gmail.com, lcmarcou@mccain.ca,
    cmichaud@coxandpalmer.com, tross@judicom.ca, coi@gnb.ca,
    m.pelletier@nb.aibn.com, "Kim.Poffenroth"<Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>,
    nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "brian.keirstead"
    < brian.keirstead@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "craig.callens"
    < craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
    "david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "jan.jensen"
    < jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
    < bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, postur
    < postur@for.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, birgittaj
    < birgittaj@althingi.is>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25
    < sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>
    Cc: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
    "Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
    < Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "CRAIG.DALTON"<CRAIG.DALTON@gnb.ca>,
    "kirk.macdonald"<kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>, briangallant10
    < briangallant10@gmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
    < Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
    Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 04:21:40 +0000
    Subject: Re: Yo Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" if Jan Jensen is
    the best lawyer the LIEbranos have to send against me then you and the
    RCMP are gonna love my next lawsuit
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


    Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

    Kveðja / Best regards
    Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
    Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2016 04:21:42 +0000
    Subject: Re: Yo Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" if Jan Jensen is
    the best lawyer the LIEbranos have to send against me then you and the
    RCMP are gonna love my next lawsuit
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


    Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.

    Kveðja / Best regards
    Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior


    On 12/13/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:


    > On 12/12/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 09:46:19 -0800
    >> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Attn premier Brian Gallant and Kirk
    >> MacDonald I just called your friends in the Law Society of New
    >> Brunswick for the last time From now on we argue before the courts
    >> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>
    >> (Français à suivre)
    >>
    >> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
    >> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> Thank you.
    >>
    >> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
    >> ‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> Merci.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 12/12/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>> Methinks if Kik MacDonald were truly wise he would make another speech
    >>> before Xmass but this time he should tell the awful truth instead of
    >>> just making fun of our trubles with LIEBRANOS N'esy Pas Davey Baby
    >>> Coon?
    >>>
    >>> Trust that watching this politite nonsense is truly offensive to any
    >>> Maritmer with two clues between their ears.
    >>>
    >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/political-panel-dec-8-1.3888331
    >>>
    >>> Conflict of Interest Commissioner
    >>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
    >>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
    >>> tel.: 506-457-7890
    >>> fax: 506-444-5224
    >>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
    >>>
    >>> Michèle Pelletier
    >>> Arseneault & Pelletier
    >>> 568A Ave. des Pionniers
    >>> Balmoral, New Brunswick E8E 1E3
    >>> Phone: 506-826-1819
    >>> Fax: 506-826-1817
    >>> Email: m.pelletier@nb.aibn.com
    >>>
    >>> KIM POFFENROTH
    >>> Assistant Deputy Attorney General
    >>> Legislative Services (Branch)
    >>> Office of the Attorney General
    >>> Phone : (506) 453-2855
    >>> Fax : (506) 457-7342
    >>> Email : Kim.POFFENROTH@gnb.ca
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/integrity-commissioner-named-1.3885165
    >>>
    >>> The Gallant government has introduced legislation to merge several
    >>> legislative watchdog positions into a single job and has chosen a
    >>> retired judge to take on the newly expanded role.
    >>>
    >>> Alexandre Deschênes
    >>>
    >>> Alexandre Deschênes, a retired New Brunswick Court of Appeal justice,
    >>> is to be the first integrity commissioner in New Brunswick.
    >>>
    >>> Retired New Brunswick Court of Appeal justice Alexandre Deschênes will
    >>> become the province's first integrity commissioner, an appointment
    >>> supported by the opposition Progressive Conservatives and Green Party
    >>> Leader David Coon.
    >>>
    >>> Premier Brian Gallant introduced a bill Wednesday to create the
    >>> position.
    >>>
    >>> For now, Deschênes fills the vacant position of conflict-of-interest
    >>> commissioner and will also oversee legislation governing the privacy
    >>> of personal health records.
    >>>
    >>> Next July, Deschênes will add responsibility for the lobbyist registry
    >>> to his duties.
    >>>
    >>> The Liberals say they will proclaim legislation to set up the registry
    >>> by next July. The law was passed by the previous PC government in 2014
    >>> but not enacted.
    >>>
    >>>      Conflict of interest commissioner, MLAs have conflicting views on
    >>> transparency
    >>>      ​Commissioner wants mandatory privacy breach reporting
    >>>      N.B. legislature will study cutting independent watchdogs
    >>>
    >>> And next September, after Anne Bertrand, the information and privacy
    >>> commissioner, finishes her seven-year term, that job will become part
    >>> of Deschênes's job as integrity commissioner.
    >>>
    >>> An  independent study, done as part of the government's program
    >>> review,  recommended the merging of the legislative officer positions.
    >>>
    >>> All parties in the legislature agreed on two other appointments
    >>> Wednesday: lawyer Michèle Pelletier as consumer advocate for insurance
    >>> and assistant deputy attorney general Kim Poffenroth as chief
    >>> electoral officer.J
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> http://lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca/en/about/council/council
    >>>
    >>> At its Annual General Meeting on Saturday, June 25th, 2016, the Law
    >>> Society of New Brunswick elected its new Executive for the 2016-2017
    >>> term:
    >>>
    >>> New Executive
    >>>
    >>> George P. Filliter, Q.C.
    >>> President
    >>> 68 Avonlea Court
    >>> Fredericton, NB E3C 1N8
    >>> Tel: (506) 454-7678
    >>> Fax: (506) 454-6983
    >>> george.filliter@gmail.com
    >>>
    >>> Luc Marcoux, Q.C.
    >>> Vice-President
    >>> McCain Foods Limited
    >>> 8800 Main Street
    >>> Florenceville-Bristol, NB E7L 1B2
    >>> Tel: (506) 375-5353
    >>> Fax: (506) 375-5058
    >>> lcmarcou@mccain.ca
    >>>
    >>> Christian E. Michaud, Q.C.
    >>> Treasurer
    >>> Cox & Palmer
    >>> Blue Cross Center
    >>> 644 Main Street, Suite 500
    >>> Moncton, NB E1C 1E2
    >>> Tel: (506) 863-1131
    >>> Fax: (506) 856-8150
    >>> cmichaud@coxandpalmer.com
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Law Society of New Brunswick
    >>> 68 Avonlea Court
    >>> Fredericton, New Brunswick
    >>> E3C 1N8
    >>> (506) 458-8540
    >>> (506) 451-1421
    >>>
    >>> general@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca
    >>>
    >>> http://lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca/en/for-lawyers/queen-counsel-nominations
    >>>
    >>> October 24, 2016
    >>>
    >>> Eleven New Brunswick lawyers were appointed Queen’s Counsel by the
    >>> Lieutenant-Governor of New Brunswick, the Honourable Jocelyne Roy
    >>> Vienneau, on Monday, October 24, 2016, at the Legislative Assembly in
    >>> Fredericton.
    >>>
    >>>      Christa Bourque, Q.C., of Moncton
    >>>      Krista Lynn Colford, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>>      The Honourable Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., of Bathurst
    >>>      Edward L. Derrah, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>>      Shannon Doran, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>>      Nathalie L. Godbout, Q.C., of Saint John
    >>>      Stephen J. Hutchison, Q.C., of Saint John
    >>>      The Honourable Dominic A. J. LeBlanc, Q.C., of Shediac
    >>>      Luc Marcoux, Q.C., of Florenceville-Bristol
    >>>      D. Andrew Rouse, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>>      John R. Williamson, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>>
    >>> The distinction of Queen’s Counsel is conferred upon experienced
    >>> lawyers in recognition of their commitment to the principles of the
    >>> legal profession and contributions to their communities. Eligible
    >>> lawyers include those who have been members of the Law Society of New
    >>> Brunswick and have been engaged in the active practice of law in the
    >>> province for at least 15 years with extensive experience before the
    >>> courts or have demonstrated exceptional service to the profession.
    >>>
    >>>   In the fall of this year, a committee consisting of the Chief Justice
    >>> of New Brunswick, J. Ernest Drapeau, the Attorney General of New
    >>> Brunswick and the President of the Law Society of New Brunswick, will
    >>> consider candidates for the next Queen’s Counsel appointments.
    >>>
    >>> The distinction of Queen’s Counsel is conferred upon experienced
    >>> lawyers in recognition of their commitment to the principles of the
    >>> legal profession and contributions to their communities. The criteria
    >>> for these appointments are:
    >>>
    >>> A regular member of the Law Society of New Brunswick who:
    >>>
    >>> a) has been engaged in the active practice of law in the Province of
    >>> New Brunswick for at least fifteen years, with extensive experience
    >>> before the courts;
    >>>
    >>> b) in the opinion of the Committee, merits the appointment by reason
    >>> of exceptional service to the legal profession.
    >>>
    >>> It should be noted that past practice indicates that Queen’s Counsel
    >>> appointments typically have more than seventeen years at the Bar.
    >>>
    >>> The Law Society encourages members to forward a letter and a resume in
    >>> order to be considered as a candidate for a Queen’s Counsel
    >>> appointment. Persons may either apply personally or may nominate a
    >>> member of the Law Society. All applicants will be treated equally by
    >>> the Committee whether they are nominated, or whether they apply
    >>> personally.
    >>>
    >>> In your letter, you may wish to identify two individuals, either
    >>> within or outside the Law Society who might provide additional
    >>> information to assist the Committee in considering this matter. If
    >>> letters of reference are provided, they may be identified for this
    >>> purpose.
    >>>
    >>> Your application or nomination should be received by Chief Justice J.
    >>> Ernest Drapeau no later than Friday, June 24, 2016, at 4:00 p.m.
    >>>
    >>> It may be sent via email to tross@judicom.ca or sent/delivered to:
    >>>
    >>> Committee on Queen’s Counsel Appointments
    >>> c/o The Hon. Chief Justice J. Ernest Drapeau
    >>> Court of Appeal of New Brunswick
    >>> Justice Building
    >>> 427 Queen Street, Room 311
    >>> Fredericton, NB   E3B 1B7
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/kirk-macdonald-dominic-leblanc-judge-moving-bill-1.3866450
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Judge-moving bill aims to help Dominic LeBlanc, Tory MLA charges
    >>> Kirk MacDonald says Liberals drafted bill to help put Jolène Richard
    >>> and André Richard on court
    >>>
    >>> By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Nov 24, 2016 6:03 PM AT
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> A Progressive Conservative MLA has taken the unusual step of naming
    >>> names — including that of a sitting provincial court judge — in his
    >>> attack on a proposed law on how Court of Queen's Bench judges are
    >>> transferred.
    >>>
    >>> Kirk MacDonald told the legislature last week that he believes the
    >>> government bill was drafted to help the spouse and the brother-in-law
    >>> of federal Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc, a close ally of Premier Brian
    >>> Gallant.
    >>> nb-andre-richard-jolene-richard
    >>>
    >>> A Progressive Conservative MLA believes the Liberal government's
    >>> judge-moving bill was drafted to help have André Richard and Jolène
    >>> Richard appointed to the Court of Queen's Bench. (CBC)
    >>>
    >>> "I will give you two names. I will give you Jolène Richard and André
    >>> Richard, two people I believe are looking for judicial appointments
    >>> here in New Brunswick," MacDonald said during second-reading debate on
    >>> the bill.
    >>>
    >>> In fact, Jolène Richard is already a provincial court judge. André
    >>> Richard is her brother and a senior lawyer at Stewart McKelvey.
    >>>
    >>>      Province names new judge, wife of MP Dominic LeBlanc
    >>>
    >>> "Dominic LeBlanc has some judges that he wants to appoint in New
    >>> Brunswick, and the framework as it currently exists does not allow for
    >>> that to happen," MacDonald said.
    >>>
    >>> André Richard stated Thursday he "had no involvement in the
    >>> government's decision to propose changes to the Judicature Act."
    >>>
    >>> "As you know, my sister is already a judge who sits in Moncton. I fail
    >>> to understand why our names are being brought into this debate."
    >>> Bill gives veto to minister
    >>>
    >>> The Liberal bill would amend the Judicature Act, which governs how
    >>> courts operate, to give the justice minister a veto over Chief Justice
    >>> David Smith of the Court of Queen's Bench transferring judges from one
    >>> court to another.
    >>> nb-chief-justice-david-smith
    >>>
    >>> Court of Queen's Bench Chief Justice David Smith has transferred 13
    >>> judges since becoming chief justice in 1998. (Acadia University)
    >>>
    >>> PC MLAs have hinted in the past about who they believe the bill was
    >>> designed to help. But until now, no one was willing to name them.
    >>>
    >>> It's rare for politicians to draw sitting judges into partisan
    >>> debates, and the veteran Tory MLA did not offer any evidence to back
    >>> up his allegations. He turned down a request to explain his views in
    >>> an interview.
    >>> Parliamentary privilege
    >>>
    >>> Parliamentary privilege protects members of the legislature from being
    >>> sued for defamation or held in contempt of court for comments they
    >>> make during proceedings. No such protection exists for things they say
    >>> outside the legislature.
    >>>
    >>> Provincial court judges such as Richard are appointed by the province,
    >>> but Court of Queen's Bench justices are named by Ottawa. Both courts
    >>> are administered by the province, but the current law gives Smith the
    >>> power to move judges on his court on his own.
    >>>
    >>> Smith has argued the bill would threaten the independence of the
    >>> courts, which could make it unconstitutional.
    >>> Bill brought back
    >>>
    >>> The Liberals introduced the bill during the last session, but it
    >>> didn't pass before the session ended. They brought it back last week.
    >>>
    >>> Justice Minister Denis Landry said last week the bill was designed to
    >>> bring "best practices" to court administration and end the pattern of
    >>> justices being named to smaller courthouses and then being transferred
    >>> soon after.
    >>>
    >>>      Judge-moving legislation introduced again
    >>>      2 chief justices appear at odds over judge-moving bill
    >>>      7 things list reveals about controversial judge-moving bill
    >>>
    >>> "This is what we want to correct," he said. "If we name a judge, they
    >>> should reside there, for a long period of time, not just two or three
    >>> months then move them where they want to go."
    >>>
    >>> Asked whether he'd veto such a transfer, Landry said, "This is what
    >>> we'll
    >>> see."
    >>>
    >>> Landry's department said Thursday it would not comment on MacDonald's
    >>> accusation.
    >>> Larger locations favoured
    >>>
    >>> MacDonald said during last week's debate that it's true Court of
    >>> Queen's Bench justices are often appointed to smaller locations and
    >>> are then moved to one of the three largest cities.
    >>> Dominic LeBlanc
    >>>
    >>> Federal Fisheries Minister Dominic LeBlanc is a close ally of New
    >>> Brunswick Premier Brian Gallant. (CBC)
    >>>
    >>> He said that court postings in Moncton, Fredericton, and Saint John
    >>> are "The positions that everyone seems to want."
    >>>
    >>> And he said the current system for moving judges, "which is controlled
    >>> by the chief justice, does not work for Dominic LeBlanc and the
    >>> Liberal Party of New Brunswick," MacDonald said.
    >>>
    >>>      Upside to judge-moving bill touted by ex-constitutional lawyer
    >>>      Gallant government's judge-moving bill questioned by legal expert
    >>>
    >>> "They want to change it. They want to have a situation where they have
    >>> a mechanism to control that decision and to effect change on that
    >>> decision."
    >>>
    >>> In June, Smith transferred Justice Tracey DeWare from Woodstock to
    >>> Moncton and Justice Richard Petrie from Saint John to Woodstock.
    >>>
    >>> DeWare was moved to fill a vacancy after Justice Brigitte Robichaud
    >>> switched to supernumerary, or part-time, status.
    >>>
    >>> Jolène Richard did not respond to interview requests.
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
    >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
    >>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
    >>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
    >>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
    >>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
    >>> to be..
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
    >>>
    >>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
    >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
    >>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
    >>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
    >>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
    >>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
    >>> to be..
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
    >>>
    >>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
    >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
    >>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
    >>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
    >>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
    >>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
    >>>
    >>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> This is the docket
    >>>
    >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>>
    >>> These are digital recordings of  the last two hearings
    >>>
    >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>>
    >>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>>
    >>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
    >>>
    >>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
    >>> Campaign, Rogers TV
    >>>
    >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
    >>>
    >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
    >>>
    >>> Veritas Vincit
    >>> David Raymond Amos
    >>> 902 800 0369
    >>>
    >>> FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
    >>> most
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >>>
    >>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    >>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    >>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    >>> five years after he began his bragging:
    >>>
    >>> January 13, 2015
    >>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >>>
    >>> December 8, 2014
    >>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >>>
    >>> Friday, October 3, 2014
    >>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    >>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
    >>>
    >>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
    >>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
    >>>
    >>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
    >>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
    >>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
    >>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
    >>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
    >>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
    >>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
    >>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
    >>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
    >>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
    >>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
    >>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
    >>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
    >>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
    >>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
    >>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
    >>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
    >>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
    >>> campaign of 2006.
    >>>
    >>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
    >>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
    >>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
    >>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
    >>>
    >>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
    >>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
    >>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
    >>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
    >>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
    >>>
    >>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
    >>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
    >>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
    >>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
    >>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
    >>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
    >>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
    >>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
    >>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
    >>>
    >>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
    >>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
    >>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
    >>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
    >>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
    >>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
    >>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
    >>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
    >>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
    >>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
    >>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
    >>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
    >>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
    >>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
    >>>
    >>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
    >>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
    >>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
    >>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
    >>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
    >>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
    >>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
    >>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
    >>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
    >>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
    >>> are not.
    >>>
    >>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
    >>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
    >>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
    >>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
    >>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
    >>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
    >>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
    >>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
    >>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
    >>>
    >>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
    >>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
    >>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
    >>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
    >>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
    >>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
    >>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
    >>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
    >>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
    >>>
    >>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
    >>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
    >>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
    >>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
    >>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
    >>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
    >>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
    >>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
    >>>
    >>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
    >>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
    >>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
    >>>
    >>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
    >>>
    >>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
    >>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
    >>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
    >>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
    >>> alive
    >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>
    >>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
    >>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
    >>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
    >>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
    >>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
    >>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
    >>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
    >>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
    >>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
    >>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
    >>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
    >>> < smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
    >>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
    >>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
    >>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
    >>> < terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
    >>> < whistleblower@ctv.ca>
    >>>
    >>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
    >>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
    >>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
    >>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
    >>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
    >>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
    >>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
    >>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
    >>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
    >>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
    >>> interesting though
    >>>
    >>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
    >>>
    >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
    >>>
    >>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
    >>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
    >>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
    >>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
    >>>
    >>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
    >>>
    >>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
    >>> shy political animal
    >>>
    >>> Veritas Vincit
    >>> David Raymond Amos
    >>> 902 800 0369
    >>>
    >>> Enjoy Mr Weston
    >>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
    >>>
    >>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
    >>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
    >>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
    >>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
    >>> including a Canadian general.
    >>>
    >>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
    >>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
    >>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
    >>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
    >>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
    >>>
    >>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
    >>>
    >>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
    >>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
    >>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
    >>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
    >>> into the US policy.
    >>>
    >>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
    >>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
    >>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
    >>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
    >>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
    >>> were deployed WMD.
    >>>
    >>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
    >>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
    >>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
    >>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
    >>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
    >>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
    >>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
    >>>
    >>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
    >>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
    >>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
    >>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
    >>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
    >>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
    >>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
    >>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
    >>> George W Bush administration was onerous
    >>>
    >>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
    >>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
    >>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
    >>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
    >>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
    >>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
    >>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
    >>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
    >>>
    >>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
    >>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
    >>>
    >>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400
    >>> Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the
    >>> 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the
    >>> Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain
    >>> this lawsuit to you real slow.
    >>> To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
    >>> "daniel.mchardie"<daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca,
    >>> info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca,
    >>> matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca,
    >>> tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com
    >>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Frank.McKenna"
    >>> < Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca,
    >>> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
    >>> "dominic.leblanc.a1"<dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca>, oldmaison
    >>> < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>,
    >>> "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay"
    >>> < peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
    >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
    >>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
    >>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
    >>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
    >>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
    >>>
    >>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
    >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000
    >>> Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
    >>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
    >>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
    >>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
    >>> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
    >>> and a response will be forthcoming.
    >>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
    >>>
    >>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
    >>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
    >>> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
    >>> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
    >>>
    >>> Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
    >>> Mallory Fowler
    >>> Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
    >>> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> For the public record I knew Birgitta was no better than the people
    >>> she bitches about when she refused to discuss the QSLS blog with me
    >>> while she was in Canada making her rounds in the Canadain media in
    >>> January of 2011.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2012/12/so-det-louie-lafleur-have-you-and.html
    >>>
    >>> From: "MacKenzie, Lloyd (SNB)"lloyd.mackenzie@snb.ca
    >>> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:01:27 -0400
    >>> Subject: Telephone Conversation re: 1965 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
    >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>> Cc: "Bastarache, Donald J.(SNB)"Donald.Bastarache@snb.ca,
    >>> "Morrison, Bill (SNB)"bill.morrison@snb.ca,
    >>> "Levesque-Finn, Sylvie(SNB)"Sylvie.Levesque-Finn@snb.ca, "Pleadwell,
    >>> Derek
    >>> (SNB)"Derek.Pleadwell@snb.ca
    >>>
    >>> Mr. Amos:
    >>> Upon your request I will inform Mr. Derek Pleadwell[(506)
    >>> 444-2897], Chairperson SNB Board of Directors, of our extended
    >>> conversation regarding the issues surrounding the 1965 Harley-Davidson
    >>> motorcycle when he visits my office at approximately 3:30 P.M. today.
    >>>
    >>> Also, as requested, I've copied in Ms. Sylvie Levesque-Finn[ (506)
    >>> 453-3879 ],SNB President.
    >>>
    >>> Lloyd D. MacKenzie, AACI, P. App, CAE
    >>> Regional Manager of Assessment - Beauséjour Region/Responsable
    >>> régional de l'évaluation - region Beauséjour
    >>> Assessment/ de l'évaluation
    >>> Service New Brunswick/ Service Nouveau-Brunswick
    >>> 633 rue Main St.
    >>> 4th floor/4ième étage
    >>> Moncton, NB E1C 8R3
    >>> Tel/Tél: (506) 856-3910
    >>> Fax/Téléc: (506) 856-2519
    >>>
    >>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/friday-13th-of-june-was-my-final-follow.html
    >>>
    >>> From: Grady, Louise (ENB)
    >>> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2014 11:55 AM
    >>> To: mailto:David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
    >>> Subject: Final Follow up: Your registration as an independent candidate
    >>>
    >>> Mr. Amos:
    >>>
    >>> Following the Chief Electoral Officer's request by telephone on May
    >>> 28, 2014 and his previous e-mailed requests for additional information
    >>> with respect to your registration as an independent candidate (please
    >>> see below), and having not received that information despite having
    >>> provided you with several opportunities to furnish the requested
    >>> information, he has now directed that said registration be cancelled.
    >>> Should you wish to re-apply for registration as an independent
    >>> candidate, you may do so after 60 days following the cancellation of
    >>> your present registration as provided for under subsection 146.1(1) of
    >>> the Elections Act.
    >>>
    >>> Louise Grady
    >>> Elections Coordinator / Coordinatrice des élections
    >>>
    >>> Elections New Brunswick / Élections Nouveau-Brunswick
    >>> Office/bureau : (506) 453-2218 / 1-800-308-2922
    >>> Fax/télécopieur: (506) 457-4926
    >>> http://www.electionsnb.ca
    >>>
    >>> From: Grady, Louise (ENB)
    >>> Sent: May 28, 2014 4:20 PM
    >>> To: 'David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com'
    >>> Subject: Follow up: Your registration as an independent candidate
    >>>
    >>> Mr. Amos:
    >>>
    >>> At the request of Mr. Michael Quinn, Chief Electoral Officer of the
    >>> Province of New Brunswick, I am writing to summarize his phone call to
    >>> you this afternoon, reminding you of his message of May 14 (see
    >>> below). In the message he left on your voice mail, he granted you a
    >>> few more days' grace and asked you to return his call at (506)
    >>> 453-2218. He added that should he not hear from you by then, he would
    >>> proceed to cancel your registration as an independent candidate as
    >>> provided for in the Elections Act.
    >>>
    >>> Louise Grady
    >>> Elections Coordinator / Coordinatrice des élections
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Elections New Brunswick / Élections Nouveau-Brunswick
    >>> Office/bureau : (506) 453-2218 / 1-800-308-2922
    >>> Fax/télécopieur: (506) 457-4926
    >>> http://www.electionsnb.ca
    >>>
    >>
    >

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Fitch, Leanne"<leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
    Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:05:42 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: I just called and tried to discuss Whitey
    Bulger's recent murder in prison and his victims buried in the
    Yarmouth area long ago
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I will be out of office March 25, 2018 returning late day April 8,
    2019. Je quitterai le bureau le 25 mars, je rentrerai tard le jour 08,
    d'avril 2019.

    Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
    an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your message may not be
    responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
    please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
    Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
    460-2300. If this is an emergency related to public safety please call
    911.

    En raison du grand nombre de courriels que reçoit cette messagerie, il
    se peut qu’une réponse tarde un peu à venir. Si vous avez besoin d'une
    réponse officielle, veuillez envoyer votre demande par écrit à mon
    attention aux soins (a/s) de la Force policière de Fredericton 311,
    rue Queen, Fredericton, NB   E3B 1B1, ou composer le 506 460-2300.
    S'il s'agit d'une urgence de sécurité publique, faites le 911.


    This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
    intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
    addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
    you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
    retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
    other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
    strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
    contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
    and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
    appreciated.

    Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
    of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
    provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
    Protection of Privacy Act.

    Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
    uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
    organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
    confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
    interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
    disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
    fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
    présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
    et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
    électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
    reconnaissants de votre collaboration.

    Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
    Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
    dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
    de la vie privée.

    GOV-OP-073



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Eddy, Jamie (Fredericton)"<JEddy@coxandpalmer.com>
    Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:07:30 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: I just called and tried to discuss Whitey
    Bulger's recent murder in prison and his victims buried in the
    Yarmouth area long ago
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I am currently out of the office at a hearing returning on Friday
    March 29.  I will have no access to emails  or phone calls during this
    period of time.  If your matter is urgent please contact my assistant
    Jennifer Patterson at 506 462 4762 / jpatterson@coxandpalmer.com who
    can direct you to another member of our Employment and Labour Group.
    Thank you. Jamie





















    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2021 19:48:13 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: I trust that his minion Mark Koneda of US Naval Intel
    and his FBI pals know why I had no respect for their Biden's old buddy
    Rep. Alcee Hastings for rather obvious reasons
    To: raylmcgovern@gmail.com
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:52:37 -0300
    Subject: I trust that his minion Mark Koneda of US Naval Intel and his
    FBI pals know why I had no respect for their Biden's old buddy Rep.
    Alcee Hastings for rather obvious reasons
    To: Dawn.McArdle@mail.house.gov, Matt.Gaetz@mail.house.gov,
    bgordon@anchorsgordon.com, patrick.parsons@mail.house.gov,
    nia_ig.fct@navy.mil, art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
    < Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int>, "Boston.Mail"
    < Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
    "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "rob.moore"
    < rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
    "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, washington field
    < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Ian.Shugart"
    < Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier
    < premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
    < premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
    < premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, PREMIER
    < PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
    < premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Office
    of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
    < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
    < barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
    < Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
    < fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>

    https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/06/rep-alcee-hastings-dies-narrowing-democratic-house-majority-to-just-7.html?__twitter_impression=true&recirc=taboolainternal

    Rep. Alcee Hastings dies, narrowing Democratic House majority to just 7
    Published Tue, Apr 6 202110:44 AM EDTUpdated Tue, Apr 6 20214:01 PM EDT
    Christian Nunley
    @cnunley7
    Share
    Key Points

        Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., died Tuesday at age 84 after a
    two-year bout with pancreatic cancer.
        Democrats now hold a narrower margin in the House, with a 218-211
    split, while six vacant seats remain.


    Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., listens to students speak about their
    experiences with gun violence during the The Gun Violence Prevention
    Task Force panel Wednesday afternoon May 23, 2018.
    Sarah Silbiger | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., died Tuesday after a more than two-year
    bout with pancreatic cancer, NBC News confirmed.

    Hastings, who served in the House for nearly three decades, was 84.
    Throughout his career, he held several key committee assignments and
    leadership positions, most recently as vice chairman of the rules
    committee. He had also been Florida’s first Black federal trial judge,
    appointed to the bench in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter.

    “As an attorney, civil rights activist and judge, and over his nearly
    thirty years in Congress, he fought tirelessly to create opportunities
    to lift up working families, communities of color, children and
    immigrants,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote in a statement.

    President Joe Biden reacted to Hastings’ death on Tuesday afternoon.
    “Across his long career of public service, Alcee always stood up to
    fight for equality, and always showed up for the working people he
    represented,” he said in a statement. “Jill and I are saddened to
    learn of his passing.”

    Democrats now hold a narrower advantage in the House, 218-211, giving
    the party a smaller margin of error in passing legislation. Six seats
    are vacant, four of which were previously held by Democrats and two by
    Republicans.

    Three of the four Democratic House seats were vacated by appointments
    to positions in President Joe Biden’s Cabinet. Deb Haaland, of New
    Mexico, was appointed secretary of the Department of Interior; Marcia
    Fudge, of Ohio, was named head of the Department of Housing and Urban
    Development, and Cedric Richmond, of Louisiana, became senior advisor
    to the president and director of the White House Office of Public
    Engagement.

    One of the two vacant GOP seats is no longer up for contest. Julia
    Letlow of Louisiana was elected in late March but has yet to be sworn
    in. Julia will replace her late husband, Luke Letlow, who was elected
    to the seat but died before being sworn in due to Covid-19
    complications.

    In 1983, when Hastings was a federal judge, he was acquitted in
    criminal court on a charge of conspiring to solicit a bribe in
    exchange for leniency in a sentencing.

    Alcee Hastings testifying at his impeachment trial in 1989.
    Michael Jenkins | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

    Nevertheless, the House impeached Hastings in 1988 amid accusations
    that he perjured himself during that criminal trial. The Senate voted
    to convict him, removing him from the bench, but did not vote to
    disqualify him from holding future office.

    Hastings appealed the impeachment conviction in 1992. A federal judge
    overturned the conviction, on the grounds that a 12-member Senate
    committee, rather than the full Senate, conducted the impeachment
    trial. This was the first time a Senate conviction was overturned by a
    federal judge.

    The next year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled federal courts do not have
    the authority to review the procedures of a Senate impeachment trial.
    Hastings’ legislative career, which began with his election in 1992
    and continued until his death, was unaffected by the decision.

    On 4/6/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
    > Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:03:08 +0000
    > Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie
    > Cooper made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas
    > Howie Anglin?
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Dear David Amos,
    > The Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) Office of the Inspector General
    > (IG) reviewed your email and attached .WAV file provided to the NIA
    > Hotline on 2 April 2021. I found no connection to the United States
    > Navy or United States Naval Intelligence.
    >
    > Naval Inspectors General exist to improve the efficiency and
    > effectiveness of US Navy Programs, and strive to eliminate and prevent
    > waste, fraud, and abuse with their respective departments. Naval IGs
    > are restricted to assessing matters falling within the purview of
    > their respective commanders.
    >
    > Citing the lack of an apparent connection to the US Navy or Naval
    > Intelligence, I am unable to provide further assistance, or provide
    > direct referral to any other agency or activity.
    >
    > Sincerely,
    >
    > Mark Koneda
    > Investigator
    > Naval Intelligence Activity
    >     Office of the Inspector General
    > NIA_IG@navy.mil
    > (301)669-3030 (unclass)
    > TSVOIP 560-3030
    >
    > INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The
    > information contained in this email and any accompanying attachments
    > may contain Inspector General sensitive or pre-decisional information,
    > which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of
    > Information Act (FOIA, 5 USC Section 552). It should not be released
    > to unauthorized persons. If you are not the intended recipient of this
    > information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of
    > any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you
    > received this email in error, please notify this office by email or by
    > calling (301) 669-3030.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    > Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 12:50 PM
    > To: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
    > Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper
    > made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie
    > Anglin?
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca
    > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 13:49:10 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper made a
    > deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie Anglin?
    > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >
    > The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be
    > reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
    >
    > Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre.
    > Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
    >
    > Art McD
    > He/Him // Il/Lui
    > Admiral/amiral Art McDonald
    >
    > Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS)
    > Canadian Armed Forces
    > art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<mailto:art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca> / Tel:
    > 613-992-5054
    >
    > Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD)
    > Forces armées canadiennes
    > art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<mailto:art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca> / Tél:
    > 613-992-5054
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    >> > > > From: "McKnight, Gisele"McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
    >> > > > To: lcampenella@ledger.com
    >> > > > Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
    >> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
    >> > > > Subject: David Amos
    >> > > >
    >> > > >
    >> > > > > Hello Lisa,
    >> > > > > David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he
    >> > became
    >> > > an
    >> > > > > independent (not representing any political party) candidate in
    >> > > > > our
    >> > > > federal
    >> > > > > election that was held June 28.
    >> > > > >
    >> > > > > He was a candidate in our constituency of Fundy (now called
    >> > > Fundy-Royal).
    >> > > > I
    >> > > > > wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates.
    >> > > > > That
    >> > > story
    >> > > > > appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story,
    >> > > > > written
    >> > by
    >> > > > one
    >> > > > > of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
    >> the
    >> > > > > candidates' debate held June 18.
    >> > > > >
    >> > > > > As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the
    >> > > > > election.
    >> > The
    >> > > > > winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.
    >> > > > >
    >> > > > > I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
    >> > taken
    >> > > by
    >> > > > > reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the
    >> > > > > photo
    >> > that
    >> > > > > ran, but this one is very similar.
    >> > > > >
    >> > > > > Gisele McKnight
    >> > > > > editor A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate
    > 2.JPG
    >> > > > > Kings County Record
    >> > > > > Sussex, New Brunswick
    >> > > > > Canada
    >> > > > > 506-433-1070
    >> > > > >
    >> > > >
    >> > >
    > Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
    >
    > By Erin Hatfield
    >
    > "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
    > world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
    >
    > The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
    > the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
    > watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
    > unofficial, theme song for the debate.
    >
    > The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
    > they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
    > Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
    > chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
    > left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
    > mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
    > the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
    >
    > The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
    > organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
    > of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
    > and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
    >
    > Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
    > responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
    > exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
    > Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
    > other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
    > Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
    > questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
    > relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
    > response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
    > getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
    >
    > Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
    > party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
    > well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
    > on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
    > places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
    > shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
    >
    > The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
    > one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
    > front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
    > voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
    > Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
    > readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
    > final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
    > register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
    > abiding citizens."
    >
    > The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
    > women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
    > yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
    > spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
    >
    > Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
    > Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
    > yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
    > post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
    > Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
    > anyplace," Armstrong responded.
    >
    > As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
    > candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
    > fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
    > process for the June 28 vote.
    >
    > Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
    > favourite possessions—motorcycles.
    >
    > McKnight/KCR
    >
    > The Unconventional Candidate
    >
    > David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
    >
    > By Gisele McKnight
    >
    > FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
    > wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
    > that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
    >
    > Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
    >
    > The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
    > and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
    > running for office in Canada.
    >
    > One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
    > to meet Elections Canada requirements.
    >
    > When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
    > favourite place to do so—Fundy.
    >
    > Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
    > dissatisfaction with politicians.
    >
    > "I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
    > said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
    >
    > The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
    > 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
    > needed to change his life.
    >
    > "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
    > sometimes in midlife."
    >
    > So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
    > motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
    > Panhead motorcycle.
    >
    > "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
    > experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
    > renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
    > for anything, but you take what they offer."
    >
    > For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
    > and conversation all over North America.
    >
    > Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
    > and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
    > himself.
    >
    > He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
    > rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
    > individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
    > Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
    >
    > Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.
    >
    > "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
    > "It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
    >
    > Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
    >
    > "I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
    > interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
    > call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
    >
    > And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
    >
    > "I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It’s
    > not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."
    >
    > What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
    > the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
    > name a few.
    >
    > "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
    > farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
    > death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
    > (NAFTA) out the window.
    >
    > NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
    > easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
    >
    > Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
    >
    > "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
    > especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
    > Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."
    >
    > Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
    > your X by his name.
    >
    > "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
    > say, ‘what the hell.’"
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Orignal message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:49:00 -0300
    > Subject: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper made a deal with the
    > VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie Anglin?
    > To: hcooper@toddweld.com, washington field
    > < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, stateofcorruptionnh1
    > < stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com>, "Boston.Mail"
    > < Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
    > art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca,
    > JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
    > Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
    > Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
    > Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    > clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
    > David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"
    > < blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca,
    > hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
    > "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>,
    > Ramesh.Sangha@parl.gc.ca, Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca,
    > Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca, Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"
    > < Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, chad@williamson.law,
    > steve.phillips@gov.ab.ca, Karen.Thorsrud@gov.ab.ca,
    > ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, Kaycee.Madu@gov.ab.ca,
    > edmontonprosecutions@gov.ab.ca, dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com,
    > howard.anglin@gmail.com, centralpeace.notley@assembly.ab.ca,
    > cypress.medicinehat@assembly.ab.ca, airdrie.east@assembly.ab.ca,
    > lacombe.ponoka@assembly.ab.ca, brooks.medicinehat@assembly.ab.ca,
    > bonnyville.coldlake.stpaul@assembly.ab.ca,
    > theangryalbertan@protonmail.com, david.dickson@dksdata.com,
    > lboothby@postmedia.com, acps.calgaryprosecutions@gov.ab.ca, premier
    > < premier@gov.ab.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
    > keean.bexte@rebelnews.com, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine
    > < sfine@globeandmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, news-tips
    > < news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
    > ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca, "Katie.Telford"
    > < Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
    > etiernan@wickedlocal.com, nesimpson@patriotledger.com,
    > jdifazio@patriotledger.com, Nathalie Sturgeon
    > < sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "steve.murphy"
    > < steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
    >
    > https://no-click.mil/?https://www.patriotledger.com/news/20180118/prosecutors-say-joyces-lawyer-lied-should-be-pulled-from-trial
    >
    > Prosecutors say Joyce’s lawyer lied, should be pulled from trial
    >
    >   By Neal Simpson
    > The Patriot Ledger
    > Posted Jan 18, 2018 at 12:59 PM
    >
    > BOSTON - Federal prosecutors have accused an attorney for former state
    > Sen. Brian Joyce of lying to state ethics officials and are asking a
    > judge to have him pulled from Joyce’s defense team if the former
    > legislator’s corruption case goes to trial.
    >
    > In a motion filed earlier this month, prosecutors said lawyer Howard
    > Cooper had made “several material and false representations” to the
    > state Ethics Commission on behalf of Joyce, a Milton Democrat who is
    > accused of using the influence of his office to collect a series of
    > bribes, kickbacks and gifts, including hundreds of pounds of free
    > coffee and a Jeep.
    >
    > Prosecutors say Cooper helped Joyce cover up at least two of his
    > schemes and could provide important testimony at trial.
    >
    > Cooper, a founding partner at Todd & Weld in Boston, was not
    > identified by name in the 113-count indictment against Joyce, but
    > prosecutors said in their motion filed earlier this month that he was
    > the unnamed attorney described in the indictment as sending misleading
    > emails and letters to the Ethics Commission on Joyce’s behalf. Cooper
    > did not respond to request for comment Wednesday.
    >
    > In one of those letters, sent in October 2016, prosecutors say Cooper
    > falsely told the Ethics Commission that Joyce had directed his
    > retirement account to purchase common stock in an energy-insurance
    > holding company doing business in Massachusetts.
    >
    > In fact, prosecutors say, the retirement account was a sham created to
    > evade IRS penalties and hide Joyce’s direct investment in the company,
    > which stood to benefit from alternative-energy legislation that Joyce
    > was championing on Beacon Hill.
    >
    > Prosecutors say Cooper also sent two misleading emails to the Ethics
    > Commission about Joyce’s relationship with a Dunkin’ Donuts franchisee
    > who made payments to Joyce and sent him free coffee at the same time
    > that the senator was pushing legislation that would help the
    > franchisee’s business.
    >
    > Prosecutors said Joyce received hundreds of pounds of free coffee from
    > the franchisee – giving much of it away to constituents or fellow
    > state senators – but later tried to claim he paid for the coffee
    > deliveries or had received them in exchange for legal services
    > provided by his law firm.
    >
    > In 2015, prosecutors say Cooper emailed the Ethics Commission and told
    > them Joyce had purchased the coffee he gave out to fellow senators the
    > previous Christmas. In reality, prosecutors say Joyce only paid for
    > the coffee only after The Boston Globe reported on the Christmas gifts
    > a month later.
    >
    > Then in 2016, prosecutors say Cooper told the commission in an email
    > that an earlier delivery of coffee in 2013 had been made in exchange
    > for Joyce’s legal work on related to a Dunkin’ Donuts franchise. But
    > prosecutors say Joyce only invented that arrangement in 2015, two
    > years after the coffee had already been delivered.
    >
    > Joyce was released last month on $250,000 bond secured by property he
    > owns in Canton. He is due back in court Feb. 23.
    >
    > Neal Simpson may be reached at nesimpson@ledger.com or follow him on
    > Twitter @NSimpson_Ledger.
    >
    > https://no-click.mil/?https://www.patriotledger.com/news/20180129/accountant-charged-with-helping-ex-sen-brian-joyce-defraud-irs
    >
    > Accountant charged with helping ex-Sen. Brian Joyce defraud IRS
    > Image: Former Massachusetts State Sen. Brian Joyce is surrounded by
    > reporters as he leaves the U.S. Federal Courthouse in Worcester, Mass
    > By Erin Tiernan
    > The Patriot Ledger
    > Posted Jan 29, 2018 at 2:50 PM
    >
    > Federal prosecutors say John H. Nardozzi helped the former Milton
    > Democrat avoid paying almost $800,000 in taxes over a four-year
    > period.
    >
    > WORCESTER — A longtime accountant for former state Sen. Brian Joyce
    > has been charged with helping the embattled Milton Democrat prepare
    > and file false income tax returns, federal officials said.
    >
    > John. H. Nardozzi of Waltham is accused of aiding Joyce and his family
    > in defrauding the government out of almost $800,000 in taxes over a
    > four-year period, according to an indictment unsealed on Monday.
    >
    > Joyce was charged in a separate federal indictment in December that
    > alleges he laundered more than $1 million in kickbacks and bribes
    > through his law practice and another private business.
    >
    > Nardozzi will appear in federal court in Worcester on Monday
    > afternoon, charged with one count of conspiring to defraud the IRS and
    > eight counts of aiding and assisting in the filing of false tax
    > returns, the U.S. Attorney’s Office said.
    >
    > Prosecutors allege Nardozzi conspired with Joyce to defraud the IRS by
    > deducting millions of dollars in personal expenses as legitimate
    > business expenses, inflating self-employment income for Joyce and his
    > wife by more than $2 million in order to maximize retirement plan
    > contributions, falsifying withdrawals from a retirement account and
    > falsifying dividends on Joyce’s personal tax returns.
    >
    > In total, Nardozzi is accused of misclassifying $2,268,520 to reduce
    > Joyce’s tax burden, according to prosecutors. Joyce’s law firm should
    > have paid out $850,748 in taxes during that period, of which Joyce
    > paid just $56,766.
    >
    > “For tax years 2011 through and including 2014, defendant Nardozzi and
    > Joyce knowingly and willfully caused [Brian Joyce’s law firm] to avoid
    > paying approximately $793,982 in federal corporate income taxes,” the
    > indictment states.
    >
    > Joyce, who moved to Westport with his family last year following an
    > FBI-raid on his law office, faces more than 100 charges ranging from
    > racketeering and extortion to money laundering and could place Joyce
    > behind bars for up to 20 years.
    >
    > Then-Acting U.S. Attorney William Weinreb hinted in December at a
    > press conference announcing Joyce’s indictment that more arrests were
    > likely as the investigation into Joyce’s alleged corruption continued.
    >
    > “He used his office as a criminal enterprise to make deals with his
    > business cronies and in exchange he took bribes, kickbacks ... and
    > took steps to conceal his corrupt acts,” Weinreb said at the time
    >
    > Nardozzi’s indictment indicates that prosecutors believe the certified
    > public accountant played a part in that cover up.
    >
    > Joyce and his wife bought $471,250 in common stock from a Delaware
    > energy insurance broker in 2014, $395,125 of which they paid for
    > though a series of early withdrawals from their retirement accounts.
    > In the Joyce indictment, prosecutors said the retirement account was a
    > sham created to evade IRS penalties and hide Joyce’s direct investment
    > in the company, which stood to benefit from alternative-energy
    > legislation that Joyce pushing on Beacon Hill.
    >
    > Prosecutors allege Nardozzi, an accountant of 37 years, falsely
    > reported it as a tax-exempt retirement account rollover with the
    > intent to help the Joyce’s avoid paying taxes to the IRS.
    >
    > “By reporting the early withdrawal of funds from the Joyce’s
    > retirement accounts as a tax-exempt rollover on Joyce’s 2014 personal
    > tax return... defendant Nardozzi and Joyce caused Joyce and Joyce’s
    > spouse to avoid paying approximately $208,100 in additional income
    > taxes and early withdrawal penalties,” the indictment states.
    >
    > Nardozzi was not named in the original 113-count indictment against
    > Joyce. Joyce pleaded not guilty to the charges on Dec. 8 and is
    > currently free on a $250,000 bond.
    >
    > Prosecutors have also fingered Joyce’s laweyr, Howard Cooper as taking
    > a role in Joyce’s corruption coverup. A motion filed earlier this
    > month asked a federal judge to remove Cooper from Joyce’s defense
    > team, accusing him of making “several material and false
    > representations” to the state Ethics Commission on behalf of Joyce.
    > Cooper has not been indicted, but prosecutors said Cooper helped Joyce
    > cover up at least two of his schemes, including the stock purchase,
    > and could provide important testimony at trial.
    >
    > Erin Tiernan may be reached at etiernan@wickedlocal.com. Neal Simpson
    > contributed to this report.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > https://no-click.mil/?https://www.patriotledger.com/news/20180404/prosecutors-in-joyce-case-earn-rebuke-from-legal-community
    >
    >
    > Prosecutors in Joyce case earn rebuke from legal community
    >
    > By Neal Simpson
    > The Patriot Ledger
    > Posted Apr 4, 2018 at 4:47 PM
    >
    > BOSTON — Federal prosecutors seeking to disqualify an attorney for
    > former state Sen. Brian Joyce from his upcoming corruption trial have
    > earned a rebuke from dozens of lawyers and several legal organizations
    > who accuse them of trying to to broaden their ability to have
    > defendants’ lawyers removed.
    >
    > Prosecutors had argued that attorney Howard M. Cooper, founding
    > partner at Todd & Weld in Boston, should be stripped from Joyce’s
    > defense team at trial because Cooper has unwittingly helped Joyce
    > cover up some of his corrupt activities by submitting false statements
    > to the state Ethics Commission, making Cooper a potential witness to
    > Joyce’s crimes. But in an amicus brief submitted earlier this week, a
    > collection of lawyers and legal organizations argue that such thinking
    > would erode defendants’ Sixth Amendment right to their chosen counsel
    > and interfere with attorneys’ ability to represent their clients while
    > criminal charges are pending.
    >
    > “Granting the present motion would threaten ethical and effective
    > advocacy by counsel in numerous other cases,” the brief reads. “It
    > would encourage the government to seek to disqualify counsel more
    > frequently in any of the array of circumstances in which defense
    > counsel may advocate on a client’s behalf and might present what the
    > government may later claim to be inaccurate information.”
    >
    > The battle over the future of Joyce’s legal representation comes as
    > the former Milton Democrat faces a 113-count indictment accusing him
    > of turning his Beacon Hill office into a money-making venture where he
    > traded legislation and political influence for more than $1 million in
    > kickbacks, hundreds of pounds of free coffee and a 2014 Jeep. He was
    > arrested on the charges this past December and released on $250,000
    > bond.
    >
    > A little more than a month after Joyce’s arrest, federal prosecutors
    > indicated that they would seek to disqualify Cooper from representing
    > Joyce at trial and could call him to testify about several statements
    > he made to the ethics commission on Joyce’s behalf. Some of those
    > statements had addressed the commission’s questions about whether the
    > senator had received free Dunkin’ Donuts coffee in exchange for
    > pushing favorable legislation, whether he’d filed legislation without
    > disclosing that it would benefit a client, and whether he’d appeared
    > before a state commission while concealing his financial investment in
    > the company.
    >
    > Prosecutors have not suggested that Cooper was aware that the
    > statements were false, but said that Joyce had nonetheless “entangled
    > Attorney Cooper in the cover-up.” In a motion filed in late February,
    > prosecutors argued that Joyce had used Cooper’s statements to further
    > his crimes, making communications between the two exempt from
    > attorney-client privilege.
    >
    > In response, Joyce accused prosecutors of trying to disqualify his
    > attorney by making him into a witness even through they hadn’t shown
    > any need for Cooper’s testimony. Joyce said he would even stipulate
    > that he himself had prepared and reviewed the statements that
    > prosecutors say were false.
    >
    > Joyce, who is a lawyer, also argued Cooper had only submitted the
    > statements to defend Joyce against allegations of wrongdoing and had
    > not been involved in setting up the corrupt deals Joyce is accused of
    > making. Joyce hired Cooper and his firm, Todd & Weld, in March 2015
    > after Boston Globe reporters began asking Joyce’s office questions.
    >
    > Joyce said disqualifying Cooper would violated his Sixth Amendment
    > right to choose his legal counsel and force him to find a new attorney
    > following the loss of his job, the end of his practice and “the
    > exhaustion of his resources.”
    >
    > “Now the government takes aim at the one attorney who has represented
    > him throughout, in whom he reposes the greatest trust and confidence,
    > and ask the Court to require him to start over with new counsel he
    > does not want and cannot afford,” attorneys for Joyce and Cooper said
    > in a motion filed on their behalf. “This would be a cruel, unfair and
    > clearly unconstitutional blow.”
    >
    > The Boston legal community apparently agrees. In a motion filed
    > Monday, a group including the Massachusetts Bar Association, the
    > Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, the American
    > Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts and 71 individual attorneys
    > argued that the prosecutors’ request had “far-reaching and troubling
    > Sixth Amendment implications,” potentially opening the door for
    > prosecutors to have defense attorneys removed from a case by claiming
    > that they had previously presented inaccurate information on their
    > client’s behalf. The Boston Bar Association is seeking to file a
    > separate amicus brief.
    >
    > “We believe the government’s motion threatens the constitutionally
    > protected right of a lawyer to present a client’s defense to courts
    > and to government agencies,” Jon Albano, president-elect of the Boston
    > Bar Association, said in a statement. “A lawyer should not be
    > disqualified for presenting a client’s side of a case when there is no
    > evidence that the lawyer knew the client was not telling the truth.”
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 12:19:51 -0400
    > Subject: Methinks one of Trump's many lawyers should call the FBI
    > dudes in DC and Beantown ASAP They are far too chicken to talk to me
    > or you N'esy Pas Mikey Gill?
    > To: sheri.dillon@morganlewis.com, washington field
    > < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, hcooper <hcooper@toddweld.com>,
    > stateofcorruptionnh1 <stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com>, "Boston.Mail"
    > < Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
    > "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
    > Pierre.Parent@parl.gc.ca, "Gib.vanErt"<Gib.vanErt@scc-csc.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
    > jonathan.albano@morganlewis.com, "Dale.Morgan"
    > < Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    >
    > Sheri A. Dillon
    > 1111 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
    > Washington, DC 20004-2541
    > United States
    > Phone +1.202.739.5749
    > sheri.dillon@morganlewis.com
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario
    > < Premier@ontario.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 13:21:16 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: The LIEbranos latest Constitutional and
    > Legal Adviser Michael Fenrick denied receiving this email but several
    > computers did not
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
    > valued.
    >
    > You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    > reviewed and taken into consideration.
    >
    > There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    > need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    > correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    > response may take several business days.
    >
    > Thanks again for your email.
    > ______­­
    >
    > Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    > nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
    >
    > Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    > considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
    >
    > Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    > responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    > la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    > ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
    >
    > Merci encore pour votre courriel.
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 09:21:12 -0400
    > Subject: Fwd: The LIEbranos latest Constitutional and Legal Adviser
    > Michael Fenrick denied receiving this email but several computers did
    > not
    > To: jagmeet.singh@ndp.ca, sfeinman <sfeinman@fahrllc.com>, premier
    > < premier@ontario.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
    > < premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
    > < premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
    > < premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, "premier.ministre"
    > < premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, doug
    > < doug@fordnation.ca>, "francis.scarpaleggia"
    > < francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca>
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 12:51:40 +0000
    > Subject: RE: The LIEbranos latest Constitutional and Legal Adviser
    > Michael Fenrick denied receiving this email but several computers did
    > not
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.  Please be
    > assured  that your email will be reviewed.
    >
    > If this is a media request, please forward your email to
    > media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>.  Thank you!
    >
    > *************************************
    >
    > Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
    > Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre  courriel sera examiné.
    >
    > Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
    > media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>.  Merci!
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
    > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
    > Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
    > To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Mr. Amos,
    > We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
    > Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
    > Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
    > of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
    > against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
    > General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
    > not be responding to further emails on this matter.
    >
    > Department of Justice
    >
    > On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >
    >> Good Day Sir
    >>
    >> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
    >> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
    >>
    >> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
    >> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
    >> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
    >> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
    >>
    >> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
    >> suggested that you study closely.
    >>
    >> This is the docket in Federal Court
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>
    >> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
    >>
    >> Dec 14th https://no-click.mil/?https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>
    >> January 11th, 2016
    >> https://no-click.mil/?https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>
    >> April 3rd, 2017
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
    >>
    >>
    >> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
    >>
    >>
    >> The only hearing thus far
    >>
    >> May 24th, 2017
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
    >>
    >>
    >> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
    >>
    >> Date: 20151223
    >>
    >> Docket: T-1557-15
    >>
    >> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
    >>
    >> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
    >>
    >> BETWEEN:
    >>
    >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >>
    >> Plaintiff
    >>
    >> and
    >>
    >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>
    >> Defendant
    >>
    >> ORDER
    >>
    >> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
    >> December 14, 2015)
    >>
    >> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
    >> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
    >> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
    >> in its entirety.
    >>
    >> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
    >> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
    >> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
    >> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
    >> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
    >> he stated:
    >>
    >> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
    >> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
    >> You are your brother’s keeper.
    >>
    >> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
    >> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
    >> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
    >> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
    >> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
    >> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
    >> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
    >> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
    >> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
    >> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
    >> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
    >> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
    >> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
    >> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
    >> Police.
    >>
    >> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
    >> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
    >> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
    >> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
    >> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
    >> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
    >> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
    >> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
    >> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
    >>
    >>
    >> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
    >> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
    >> is no order as to costs.
    >>
    >> “B. Richard Bell”
    >> Judge
    >>
    >>
    >> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
    >> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
    >> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
    >>
    >>   I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
    >> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
    >> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
    >> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
    >>
    >> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
    >> most
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >>
    >> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    >> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    >> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    >> five years after he began his bragging:
    >>
    >> January 13, 2015
    >> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >>
    >> December 8, 2014
    >> Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >>
    >> Friday, October 3, 2014
    >> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    >> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
    >>
    >>
    >> Vertias Vincit
    >> David Raymond Amos
    >> 902 800 0369
    >> >> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
    >> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
    >> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
    >> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
    >>
    >> Subject:
    >> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
    >> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
    >> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>
    >> January 30, 2007
    >>
    >> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
    >>
    >> Mr. David Amos
    >>
    >> Dear Mr. Amos:
    >>
    >> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
    >> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
    >>
    >> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
    >> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
    >> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
    >>
    >> Sincerely,
    >>
    >> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
    >> Minister of Health
    >>
    >> CM/cb
    >>
    >>
    >> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
    >> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
    >> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
    >> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
    >> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
    >> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
    >>
    >> Dear Mr. Amos,
    >>
    >> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
    >> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
    >> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
    >>
    >> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
    >> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
    >> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
    >> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
    >> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
    >> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
    >>
    >> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
    >> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
    >> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
    >> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
    >> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
    >>
    >> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
    >> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
    >>
    >>   Sincerely,
    >>
    >> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
    >> GRC Caledonia RCMP
    >> Traffic Services NCO
    >> Ph: (506) 387-2222
    >> Fax: (506) 387-4622
    >> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
    >>
    >>
    >> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
    >> Senator Arlen Specter
    >> United States Senate
    >> Committee on the Judiciary
    >> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
    >> Washington, DC 20510
    >>
    >> Dear Mr. Specter:
    >>
    >> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
    >> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
    >> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
    >> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
    >> contact
    >> with you about this previously.
    >>
    >> Very truly yours,
    >> Barry A. Bachrach
    >> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
    >> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
    >> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-integrity-commissioner-conflict-of-interest-boudreau-1.4154004
    >>
    >> Integrity commissioner calls for tougher conflict-of-interest law
    >> N.B. legislation should apply to apparent conflicts, not just actual
    >> ones, Alexandre Deschênes says
    >> By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Jun 12, 2017 6:30 AM AT
    >>
    >> Alexandre Deschênes's first act as commissioner was to deal with
    >> Victor Boudreau's 20 per cent investment in Shediac Campground Ltd., a
    >> proposed 700-site facility that has generated local opposition.
    >> (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
    >>
    >> New Brunswick's integrity commissioner says the conflict-of-interest
    >> law for politicians should be toughened to clarify cases such as
    >> cabinet minister Victor Boudreau's former investment in a proposed
    >> campground near Parlee Beach.
    >>
    >> Alexandre Deschênes said earlier this year that Boudreau's stake in
    >> the project did not put him in a conflict of interest but that the
    >> appearance of a conflict was "inevitable."
    >>
    >> Unlike other conflict-of-interest laws, "our act does not apply to an
    >> apparent conflict of interest," he said in an interview with CBC News.
    >> "It's not in there."
    >>
    >> Previous commissioners suggested law
    >>
    >> Boudreau recused himself from Parlee Beach issues anyway, even though
    >> he didn't technically have to. The law said ministers aren't in a
    >> conflict if decisions that affect their private interests also apply
    >> to the general public.
    >>
    >>      Boudreau recuses himself from Parlee Beach controversy
    >>      Victor Boudreau case shows 'huge loophole' in conflict law, ethics
    >> group says
    >>
    >> "Mr. Boudreau could have gone on and said, 'I'm the minister of health
    >> and I'm going to make decisions that apply to the general public and
    >> the act allows it,'" Deschênes said.
    >>
    >> "If you'd had the words 'apparent conflict of interest' [in the law]
    >> it would have been clear."
    >>
    >> Deschênes pointed out two of his predecessors as conflict-of-interest
    >> commissioner, Pat Ryan and Stuart Stratton, recommended expanding the
    >> act to include the appearance of conflicts.
    >>
    >> "It started out way back," he said. "We're looking at almost a decade
    >> here where the suggestion has been made that apparent conflict of
    >> interest ought to be included in the act. It's not been done.
    >>
    >> "But as a commissioner, I will be following what they've been doing
    >> and I will be recommending it when I file a report."
    >>
    >> Updated conflict act
    >>
    >> The Gallant Liberals passed amendments to update the Members Conflict
    >> of Interest Act during the spring session of the legislature, but they
    >> did not include a ban on perceived conflicts.
    >>
    >> Progressive Conservative MLA Brian MacDonald has also called for the
    >> Liberals to fix what he calls "a gap in the law."
    >>
    >>      'Gap in the law': PC critic suggests review of conflict law
    >>      Premier backs Victor Boudreau's involvement in Parlee Beach issue​
    >>
    >> Deschênes was appointed the province's integrity commissioner last
    >> year. The new role incorporates the role of conflict-of-interest
    >> watchdog and registrar of lobbyists, and in September it will also
    >> include the Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
    >>
    >> Victor
    >>
    >> Cabinet minister Victor Boudreau recused himself from the Parlee Beach
    >> issues anyway, even though the law said ministers aren't in a conflict
    >> if decisions that affect their private interests also apply to the
    >> general public. (CBC)
    >>
    >> Deschênes's first act as commissioner was to deal with Boudreau's 20
    >> per cent investment in Shediac Campground Ltd., a proposed 700-site
    >> facility that has generated local opposition.
    >>
    >> As health minister, Boudreau oversees the public health offices, and
    >> his department was part of a working group looking at how to deal with
    >> fecal contamination at Parlee Beach. One option the group looked at
    >> was a moratorium on new development near the beach.
    >>
    >> That would have affected the proposed campground.
    >>
    >>      'I told him, and he made it public, that the appearance of
    >> conflict in this case was absolutely inevitable. He couldn't get
    >> around it. It was there.'
    >>
    >>      - Alexandre Deschênes
    >>
    >> The law bans ministers from making decisions that affect their
    >> "private interest," but it makes an exception if the decision applies
    >> to the broader public, even if the minister would still benefit.
    >>
    >> Deschênes said in his letter to Boudreau in March that "one could
    >> argue" a decision on a moratorium would affect the broader public.
    >>
    >> "Under the act, he might have been entitled to continue to have
    >> discussions that applied to the general population, even though he was
    >> part of [the project] at that point," Deschênes said in an interview
    >> last week.
    >>
    >> "I told him, and he made it public, that the appearance of conflict in
    >> this case was absolutely inevitable. He couldn't get around it. It was
    >> there."
    >> An MP's perceived conflict matters
    >>
    >> The federal conflict of interest code for MPs also includes an
    >> exception for decisions that affect the general public, but it
    >> includes an explicit reference to perceived conflicts.
    >>
    >> Boudreau put his investment in a blind trust in 2014, which meant he
    >> had no role in the running of the business. But the value of his stake
    >> would have been affected by a moratorium on future development.
    >>
    >> Parlee beach
    >>
    >> In May, Victor Boudreau announced he was giving up his investment in
    >> the campground on Parlee Beach altogether.
    >>
    >> He said in March he learned of the potential moratorium Feb. 28 and
    >> met with Deschênes March 2, the first date they could arrange it.
    >>
    >> "That perception is the issue," Boudreau said at the time. "And if the
    >> perception is the issue, and the perception is what's going to be
    >> prevent us from getting to the bottom of it, then I'm prepared to
    >> recuse myself from all activities relating to this committee."
    >>
    >> Last month he announced that he was giving up his investment in the
    >> campground altogether.
    >>
    >> Deschênes said he believes most ministers and MLAs would do the same
    >> thing if he told them there was an apparent, but not actual, conflict.
    >>
    >> "In most cases I think they will listen and they will do what has to
    >> be done to put an end to an apparent conflict of interest, although
    >> technically they could continue to do what they want to do."
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> 6 Comments
    >>
    >> David Raymond Amos
    >>
    >> I sure hope the new integrity commissioner finally does his job and
    >> answers me in writing
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
    >> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
    >> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
    >> tel.: 506-457-7890
    >> fax: 506-444-5224
    >> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
    >> Integrity Commissioner
    >>
    >> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
    >> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
    >> Deschênes. They have two sons.
    >>
    >> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
    >> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
    >> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
    >> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
    >> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
    >> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
    >> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
    >> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
    >> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
    >> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
    >>
    >> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
    >> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
    >>
    >> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
    >> Canada.
    >>
    >> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
    >> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
    >> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
    >> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
    >>
    >> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
    >> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
    >> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
    >> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
    >> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
    >> Registration Act.
    >>
    >> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
    >> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 16:22:25 -0400
    >> Subject: Thank you for your signature Frenchy
    >> To: Andre Murray <andremurraynow@gmail.com>, "marie-claude.blais"
    >> < marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
    >> evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>,
    >> "danny.copp"<danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, nbombud
    >> < nbombud@gnb.ca>, coi <coi@gnb.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
    >> < Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    >> Cc: "dan. bussieres"<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
    >> < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>
    >>
    >> From: "Bussières, Dan (LEG)"<Dan.Bussieres@gnb.ca>
    >> Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 15:47:49 -0400
    >> Subject: RE: I just called all three of your offices
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> Oui je vois
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 12/6/12, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>> I don't take orders well ask the corrupt ex cop Bussieres why that is
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:46:11 -0400
    >> Subject: Attn premier Brian Gallant and Kirk MacDonald I just called
    >> your friends in the Law Society of New Brunswick for the last time
    >> From now on we argue before the courts
    >> To: george.filliter@gmail.com, lcmarcou@mccain.ca,
    >> cmichaud@coxandpalmer.com, tross@judicom.ca, coi@gnb.ca,
    >> m.pelletier@nb.aibn.com, "Kim.Poffenroth"<Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>,
    >> nbpc <nbpc@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    >> "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "brian.keirstead"
    >> < brian.keirstead@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    >> "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
    >> < David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "jan.jensen"
    >> < jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
    >> < bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, postur
    >> < postur@for.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, birgittaj
    >> < birgittaj@althingi.is>
    >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "kirk.macdonald"
    >> < kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>,
    >> "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>
    >>
    >> Methinks if Kik MacDonald were truly wise he would make another speech
    >> before Xmass but this time he should tell the awful truth instead of
    >> just making fun of our trubles with LIEBRANOS N'esy Pas Davey Baby
    >> Coon?
    >>
    >> Trust that watching this politite nonsense is truly offensive to any
    >> Maritmer with two clues between their ears.
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/political-panel-dec-8-1.3888331
    >>
    >> Conflict of Interest Commissioner
    >> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
    >> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
    >> tel.: 506-457-7890
    >> fax: 506-444-5224
    >> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> Michèle Pelletier
    >> Arseneault & Pelletier
    >> 568A Ave. des Pionniers
    >> Balmoral, New Brunswick E8E 1E3
    >> Phone: 506-826-1819
    >> Fax: 506-826-1817
    >> Email: m.pelletier@nb.aibn.com
    >>
    >> KIM POFFENROTH
    >> Assistant Deputy Attorney General
    >> Legislative Services (Branch)
    >> Office of the Attorney General
    >> Phone : (506) 453-2855
    >> Fax : (506) 457-7342
    >> Email : Kim.POFFENROTH@gnb.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/integrity-commissioner-named-1.3885165
    >>
    >> The Gallant government has introduced legislation to merge several
    >> legislative watchdog positions into a single job and has chosen a
    >> retired judge to take on the newly expanded role.
    >>
    >> Alexandre Deschênes
    >>
    >> Alexandre Deschênes, a retired New Brunswick Court of Appeal justice,
    >> is to be the first integrity commissioner in New Brunswick.
    >>
    >> Retired New Brunswick Court of Appeal justice Alexandre Deschênes will
    >> become the province's first integrity commissioner, an appointment
    >> supported by the opposition Progressive Conservatives and Green Party
    >> Leader David Coon.
    >>
    >> Premier Brian Gallant introduced a bill Wednesday to create the position.
    >>
    >> For now, Deschênes fills the vacant position of conflict-of-interest
    >> commissioner and will also oversee legislation governing the privacy
    >> of personal health records.
    >>
    >> Next July, Deschênes will add responsibility for the lobbyist registry
    >> to his duties.
    >>
    >> The Liberals say they will proclaim legislation to set up the registry
    >> by next July. The law was passed by the previous PC government in 2014
    >> but not enacted.
    >>
    >>      Conflict of interest commissioner, MLAs have conflicting views on
    >> transparency
    >>      ​Commissioner wants mandatory privacy breach reporting
    >>      N.B. legislature will study cutting independent watchdogs
    >>
    >> And next September, after Anne Bertrand, the information and privacy
    >> commissioner, finishes her seven-year term, that job will become part
    >> of Deschênes's job as integrity commissioner.
    >>
    >> An  independent study, done as part of the government's program
    >> review,  recommended the merging of the legislative officer positions.
    >>
    >> All parties in the legislature agreed on two other appointments
    >> Wednesday: lawyer Michèle Pelletier as consumer advocate for insurance
    >> and assistant deputy attorney general Kim Poffenroth as chief
    >> electoral officer.J
    >>
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca/en/about/council/council
    >>
    >> At its Annual General Meeting on Saturday, June 25th, 2016, the Law
    >> Society of New Brunswick elected its new Executive for the 2016-2017
    >> term:
    >>
    >> New Executive
    >>
    >> George P. Filliter, Q.C.
    >> President
    >> 68 Avonlea Court
    >> Fredericton, NB E3C 1N8
    >> Tel: (506) 454-7678
    >> Fax: (506) 454-6983
    >> george.filliter@gmail.com
    >>
    >> Luc Marcoux, Q.C.
    >> Vice-President
    >> McCain Foods Limited
    >> 8800 Main Street
    >> Florenceville-Bristol, NB E7L 1B2
    >> Tel: (506) 375-5353
    >> Fax: (506) 375-5058
    >> lcmarcou@mccain.ca
    >>
    >> Christian E. Michaud, Q.C.
    >> Treasurer
    >> Cox & Palmer
    >> Blue Cross Center
    >> 644 Main Street, Suite 500
    >> Moncton, NB E1C 1E2
    >> Tel: (506) 863-1131
    >> Fax: (506) 856-8150
    >> cmichaud@coxandpalmer.com
    >>
    >>
    >> Law Society of New Brunswick
    >> 68 Avonlea Court
    >> Fredericton, New Brunswick
    >> E3C 1N8
    >> (506) 458-8540
    >> (506) 451-1421
    >>
    >> general@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca/en/for-lawyers/queen-counsel-nominations
    >>
    >> October 24, 2016
    >>
    >> Eleven New Brunswick lawyers were appointed Queen’s Counsel by the
    >> Lieutenant-Governor of New Brunswick, the Honourable Jocelyne Roy
    >> Vienneau, on Monday, October 24, 2016, at the Legislative Assembly in
    >> Fredericton.
    >>
    >>      Christa Bourque, Q.C., of Moncton
    >>      Krista Lynn Colford, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>      The Honourable Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., of Bathurst
    >>      Edward L. Derrah, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>      Shannon Doran, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>      Nathalie L. Godbout, Q.C., of Saint John
    >>      Stephen J. Hutchison, Q.C., of Saint John
    >>      The Honourable Dominic A. J. LeBlanc, Q.C., of Shediac
    >>      Luc Marcoux, Q.C., of Florenceville-Bristol
    >>      D. Andrew Rouse, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>      John R. Williamson, Q.C., of Fredericton
    >>
    >> The distinction of Queen’s Counsel is conferred upon experienced
    >> lawyers in recognition of their commitment to the principles of the
    >> legal profession and contributions to their communities. Eligible
    >> lawyers include those who have been members of the Law Society of New
    >> Brunswick and have been engaged in the active practice of law in the
    >> province for at least 15 years with extensive experience before the
    >> courts or have demonstrated exceptional service to the profession.
    >>
    >>   In the fall of this year, a committee consisting of the Chief Justice
    >> of New Brunswick, J. Ernest Drapeau, the Attorney General of New
    >> Brunswick and the President of the Law Society of New Brunswick, will
    >> consider candidates for the next Queen’s Counsel appointments.
    >>
    >> The distinction of Queen’s Counsel is conferred upon experienced
    >> lawyers in recognition of their commitment to the principles of the
    >> legal profession and contributions to their communities. The criteria
    >> for these appointments are:
    >>
    >> A regular member of the Law Society of New Brunswick who:
    >>
    >> a) has been engaged in the active practice of law in the Province of
    >> New Brunswick for at least fifteen years, with extensive experience
    >> before the courts;
    >>
    >> b) in the opinion of the Committee, merits the appointment by reason
    >> of exceptional service to the legal profession.
    >>
    >> It should be noted that past practice indicates that Queen’s Counsel
    >> appointments typically have more than seventeen years at the Bar.
    >>
    >> The Law Society encourages members to forward a letter and a resume in
    >> order to be considered as a candidate for a Queen’s Counsel
    >> appointment. Persons may either apply personally or may nominate a
    >> member of the Law Society. All applicants will be treated equally by
    >> the Committee whether they are nominated, or whether they apply
    >> personally.
    >>
    >> In your letter, you may wish to identify two individuals, either
    >> within or outside the Law Society who might provide additional
    >> information to assist the Committee in considering this matter. If
    >> letters of reference are provided, they may be identified for this
    >> purpose.
    >>
    >> Your application or nomination should be received by Chief Justice J.
    >> Ernest Drapeau no later than Friday, June 24, 2016, at 4:00 p.m.
    >>
    >> It may be sent via email to tross@judicom.ca or sent/delivered to:
    >>
    >> Committee on Queen’s Counsel Appointments
    >> c/o The Hon. Chief Justice J. Ernest Drapeau
    >> Court of Appeal of New Brunswick
    >> Justice Building
    >> 427 Queen Street, Room 311
    >> Fredericton, NB   E3B 1B7
    >>
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/kirk-macdonald-dominic-leblanc-judge-moving-bill-1.3866450
    >>
    >>
    >> Judge-moving bill aims to help Dominic LeBlanc, Tory MLA charges
    >> Kirk MacDonald says Liberals drafted bill to help put Jolène Richard
    >> and André Richard on court
    >>
    >> By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Nov 24, 2016 6:03 PM AT
    >>
    >> A Progressive Conservative MLA has taken the unusual step of naming
    >> names — including that of a sitting provincial court judge — in his
    >> attack on a proposed law on how Court of Queen's Bench judges are
    >> transferred.
    >>
    >> Kirk MacDonald told the legislature last week that he believes the
    >> government bill was drafted to help the spouse and the brother-in-law
    >> of federal Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc, a close ally of Premier Brian
    >> Gallant.
    >> nb-andre-richard-jolene-richard
    >>
    >> A Progressive Conservative MLA believes the Liberal government's
    >> judge-moving bill was drafted to help have André Richard and Jolène
    >> Richard appointed to the Court of Queen's Bench. (CBC)
    >>
    >> "I will give you two names. I will give you Jolène Richard and André
    >> Richard, two people I believe are looking for judicial appointments
    >> here in New Brunswick," MacDonald said during second-reading debate on
    >> the bill.
    >>
    >> In fact, Jolène Richard is already a provincial court judge. André
    >> Richard is her brother and a senior lawyer at Stewart McKelvey.
    >>
    >>      Province names new judge, wife of MP Dominic LeBlanc
    >>
    >> "Dominic LeBlanc has some judges that he wants to appoint in New
    >> Brunswick, and the framework as it currently exists does not allow for
    >> that to happen," MacDonald said.
    >>
    >> André Richard stated Thursday he "had no involvement in the
    >> government's decision to propose changes to the Judicature Act."
    >>
    >> "As you know, my sister is already a judge who sits in Moncton. I fail
    >> to understand why our names are being brought into this debate."
    >> Bill gives veto to minister
    >>
    >> The Liberal bill would amend the Judicature Act, which governs how
    >> courts operate, to give the justice minister a veto over Chief Justice
    >> David Smith of the Court of Queen's Bench transferring judges from one
    >> court to another.
    >> nb-chief-justice-david-smith
    >>
    >> Court of Queen's Bench Chief Justice David Smith has transferred 13
    >> judges since becoming chief justice in 1998. (Acadia University)
    >>
    >> PC MLAs have hinted in the past about who they believe the bill was
    >> designed to help. But until now, no one was willing to name them.
    >>
    >> It's rare for politicians to draw sitting judges into partisan
    >> debates, and the veteran Tory MLA did not offer any evidence to back
    >> up his allegations. He turned down a request to explain his views in
    >> an interview.
    >> Parliamentary privilege
    >>
    >> Parliamentary privilege protects members of the legislature from being
    >> sued for defamation or held in contempt of court for comments they
    >> make during proceedings. No such protection exists for things they say
    >> outside the legislature.
    >>
    >> Provincial court judges such as Richard are appointed by the province,
    >> but Court of Queen's Bench justices are named by Ottawa. Both courts
    >> are administered by the province, but the current law gives Smith the
    >> power to move judges on his court on his own.
    >>
    >> Smith has argued the bill would threaten the independence of the
    >> courts, which could make it unconstitutional.
    >> Bill brought back
    >>
    >> The Liberals introduced the bill during the last session, but it
    >> didn't pass before the session ended. They brought it back last week.
    >>
    >> Justice Minister Denis Landry said last week the bill was designed to
    >> bring "best practices" to court administration and end the pattern of
    >> justices being named to smaller courthouses and then being transferred
    >> soon after.
    >>
    >>      Judge-moving legislation introduced again
    >>      2 chief justices appear at odds over judge-moving bill
    >>      7 things list reveals about controversial judge-moving bill
    >>
    >> "This is what we want to correct," he said. "If we name a judge, they
    >> should reside there, for a long period of time, not just two or three
    >> months then move them where they want to go."
    >>
    >> Asked whether he'd veto such a transfer, Landry said, "This is what we'll
    >> see."
    >>
    >> Landry's department said Thursday it would not comment on MacDonald's
    >> accusation.
    >> Larger locations favoured
    >>
    >> MacDonald said during last week's debate that it's true Court of
    >> Queen's Bench justices are often appointed to smaller locations and
    >> are then moved to one of the three largest cities.
    >> Dominic LeBlanc
    >>
    >> Federal Fisheries Minister Dominic LeBlanc is a close ally of New
    >> Brunswick Premier Brian Gallant. (CBC)
    >>
    >> He said that court postings in Moncton, Fredericton, and Saint John
    >> are "The positions that everyone seems to want."
    >>
    >> And he said the current system for moving judges, "which is controlled
    >> by the chief justice, does not work for Dominic LeBlanc and the
    >> Liberal Party of New Brunswick," MacDonald said.
    >>
    >>      Upside to judge-moving bill touted by ex-constitutional lawyer
    >>      Gallant government's judge-moving bill questioned by legal expert
    >>
    >> "They want to change it. They want to have a situation where they have
    >> a mechanism to control that decision and to effect change on that
    >> decision."
    >>
    >> In June, Smith transferred Justice Tracey DeWare from Woodstock to
    >> Moncton and Justice Richard Petrie from Saint John to Woodstock.
    >>
    >> DeWare was moved to fill a vacancy after Justice Brigitte Robichaud
    >> switched to supernumerary, or part-time, status.
    >>
    >> Jolène Richard did not respond to interview requests.
    >>
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
    >> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
    >> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
    >> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
    >> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
    >> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
    >> to be..
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >>
    >> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
    >>
    >> Kveðja / Best regards
    >> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
    >> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
    >> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
    >> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
    >> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
    >> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
    >> to be..
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >>
    >> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
    >>
    >> Kveðja / Best regards
    >> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
    >> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
    >> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
    >> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
    >> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
    >> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >>
    >> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
    >>
    >> Kveðja / Best regards
    >> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
    >>
    >>
    >> This is the docket
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>
    >> These are digital recordings of  the last two hearings
    >>
    >> Dec 14th https://no-click.mil/?https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>
    >> Jan 11th https://no-click.mil/?https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>
    >> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
    >>
    >> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
    >> Campaign, Rogers TV
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
    >>
    >> Veritas Vincit
    >> David Raymond Amos
    >> 902 800 0369
    >>
    >> FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
    >>
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >>
    >> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    >> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    >> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    >> five years after he began his bragging:
    >>
    >> January 13, 2015
    >> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >>
    >> December 8, 2014
    >> Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >>
    >> Friday, October 3, 2014
    >> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    >> Stupid Justin Trudeau
    >>
    >> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
    >> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
    >>
    >> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
    >> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
    >> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
    >> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
    >> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
    >> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
    >> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
    >> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
    >> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
    >> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
    >> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
    >> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
    >> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
    >> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
    >> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
    >> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
    >> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
    >> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
    >> campaign of 2006.
    >>
    >> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
    >> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
    >> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
    >> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
    >>
    >> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
    >> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
    >> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
    >> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
    >> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
    >>
    >> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
    >> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
    >> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
    >> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
    >> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
    >> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
    >> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
    >> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
    >> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
    >>
    >> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
    >> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
    >> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
    >> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
    >> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
    >> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
    >> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
    >> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
    >> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
    >> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
    >> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
    >> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
    >> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
    >> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
    >>
    >> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
    >> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
    >> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
    >> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
    >> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
    >> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
    >> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
    >> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
    >> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
    >> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
    >> are not.
    >>
    >> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
    >> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
    >> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
    >> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
    >> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
    >> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
    >> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
    >> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
    >> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
    >>
    >> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
    >> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
    >> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
    >> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
    >> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
    >> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
    >> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
    >> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
    >> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
    >>
    >> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
    >> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
    >> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
    >> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
    >> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
    >> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
    >> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
    >> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
    >>
    >> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
    >> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
    >> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
    >>
    >> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
    >>
    >> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
    >> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
    >> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
    >> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
    >> alive
    >> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>
    >> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
    >> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
    >> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
    >> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
    >> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
    >> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
    >> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
    >> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
    >> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
    >> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
    >> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
    >> < smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
    >> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
    >> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
    >> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
    >> < terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
    >> < whistleblower@ctv.ca>
    >>
    >> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
    >> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
    >> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
    >> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
    >> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
    >> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
    >> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
    >> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
    >> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
    >> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
    >> interesting though
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
    >>
    >> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
    >> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
    >> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
    >> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
    >>
    >> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
    >> shy political animal
    >>
    >> Veritas Vincit
    >> David Raymond Amos
    >> 902 800 0369
    >>
    >> Enjoy Mr Weston
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
    >>
    >> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
    >> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
    >> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
    >> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
    >> including a Canadian general.
    >>
    >> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
    >> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
    >> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
    >> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
    >> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
    >>
    >> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
    >> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
    >> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
    >> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
    >> into the US policy.
    >>
    >> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
    >> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
    >> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
    >> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
    >> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
    >> were deployed WMD.
    >>
    >> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
    >> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
    >> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
    >> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
    >> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
    >> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
    >> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
    >>
    >> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
    >> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
    >> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
    >> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
    >> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
    >> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
    >> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
    >> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
    >> George W Bush administration was onerous
    >>
    >> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
    >> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
    >> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
    >> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
    >> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
    >> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
    >> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
    >> ....not necessarily in that order. "
    >>
    >> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
    >> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
    >>
    >> https://no-click.mil/?http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400
    >> Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the
    >> 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the
    >> Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain
    >> this lawsuit to you real slow.
    >> To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
    >> "daniel.mchardie"<daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca,
    >> info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca,
    >> matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca,
    >> tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com
    >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Frank.McKenna"
    >> < Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca,
    >> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
    >> "dominic.leblanc.a1"<dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca>, oldmaison
    >> < oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>,
    >> "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay"
    >> < peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    > https://no-click.mil/?http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
    >
    >
    > Sunday, 19 November 2017
    >
    > Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
    > It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
    > The Supreme Court
    >
    > https://no-click.mil/?https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
    >
    >
    > Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    >
    > Amos v. Canada
    > Court (s) Database
    >
    > Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    > Date
    >
    > 2017-10-30
    > Neutral citation
    >
    > 2017 FCA 213
    > File numbers
    >
    > A-48-16
    > Date: 20171030
    >
    > Docket: A-48-16
    > Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    > CORAM:
    >
    > WEBB J.A.
    > NEAR J.A.
    > GLEASON J.A.
    >
    >
    > BETWEEN:
    > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    > Respondent on the cross-appeal
    > (and formally Appellant)
    > and
    > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    > Appellant on the cross-appeal
    > (and formerly Respondent)
    > Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
    > Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
    > REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
    >
    > THE COURT
    >
    >
    >
    > Date: 20171030
    >
    > Docket: A-48-16
    > Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    > CORAM:
    >
    > WEBB J.A.
    > NEAR J.A.
    > GLEASON J.A.
    >
    >
    > BETWEEN:
    > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    > Respondent on the cross-appeal
    > (and formally Appellant)
    > and
    > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    > Appellant on the cross-appeal
    > (and formerly Respondent)
    > REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
    >
    > I.                    Introduction
    >
    > [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
    > filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
    > against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
    > in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
    > Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
    > properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
    > that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
    > Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
    > (Claim at para. 96).
    >
    > [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
    > motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
    > Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
    > amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
    > disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
    > and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
    > Prothontary’s Order).
    >
    >
    > [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
    > Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
    > Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
    > Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
    > for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
    > 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
    >
    >
    > [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
    > Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
    > Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
    > As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
    > cross-appeal.
    >
    >
    > II.                 Preliminary Matter
    >
    > [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
    > relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
    > 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
    > the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
    > This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
    > had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
    > Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
    > several judges but did not name those judges.
    >
    > [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
    > identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
    > had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
    > with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
    > Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
    > the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
    > subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
    > c. F-7:
    >
    >
    > 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
    > office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
    > jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
    > Appeal.
    > […]
    >
    > 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
    > d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
    > les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
    > […]
    > 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
    > that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
    > jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
    >
    > 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
    > Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
    > juges de la Cour fédérale.
    >
    >
    > [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
    > judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
    > versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
    > Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
    > section.
    > [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
    > 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    > — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
    > Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
    > continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
    > for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
    > a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    >
    > 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
    > fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
    > français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
    > à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
    > Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
    > continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
    > matière civile et pénale.
    > 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    > — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
    > English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
    > additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
    > the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
    > court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    >
    > 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
    > première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
    > Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
    > maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
    > d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
    > canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
    > compétence en matière civile et pénale.
    >
    >
    > [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
    > two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
    > (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
    > Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
    > need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
    > Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
    > to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
    > file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
    > decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
    > that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
    > appeal book.
    >
    >
    > [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
    > March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
    > Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
    > conflict in any matter related to him.
    >
    >
    > [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
    > before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
    > conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
    > Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
    > Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
    > Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
    > Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
    > cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
    > Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
    > will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
    > before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
    > relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
    >
    >
    > [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
    > the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
    > submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
    > conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
    > afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
    > that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
    > view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
    > documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
    > documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
    > judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
    > copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
    > such judge had a conflict.
    >
    >
    > [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
    > that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
    > 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
    > that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
    > had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
    > therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
    > of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
    > personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
    > Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
    > was a member of such firm.
    >
    >
    > [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
    > appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
    > focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
    > Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
    > the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
    > particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
    > lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
    > after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
    > Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
    >
    >
    > [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
    > alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
    > Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
    > Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
    > practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
    > Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
    > who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
    > affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
    > that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
    > letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
    > Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
    > Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
    > “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
    > Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
    > possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
    > [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
    > was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
    > Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
    > 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
    > judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
    > apprehension of bias:
    > 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
    > criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
    > Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
    > Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
    > reasonable apprehension of bias:
    > … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
    > reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
    > question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
    > of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
    > viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
    > the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
    > than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
    > unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
    >
    > [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
    > person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
    > thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
    > give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
    > previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
    > administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
    > rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
    > Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
    > also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
    > (4th) 193).
    >
    > [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
    > Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
    > Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
    > particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
    > case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
    > involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
    > Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
    > judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
    > lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
    > determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
    > rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
    > 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
    > finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
    > which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
    > as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
    >
    >
    > 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
    > asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
    > the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
    > taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
    > defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
    > judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
    > Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
    > Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
    > there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
    > and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
    >
    >
    > 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
    > inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
    > different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
    > judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
    > of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
    > conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
    > involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
    > in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
    > for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
    > interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
    > statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
    > information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
    > opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
    > His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
    > had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
    > unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
    >
    >
    > 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
    > of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
    > disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
    > two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
    > recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
    > that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
    > that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
    > time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
    >              To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
    > the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
    > involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
    > the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
    > circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
    > or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
    > 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
    > Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
    > trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
    > been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
    > his former firm for a considerable period of time.
    >
    >
    > 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
    > realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
    > and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
    > of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
    > in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
    > In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
    > trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
    > his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
    > decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
    > either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
    > client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
    > off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
    > client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
    > earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
    > events from over a decade ago.
    > (emphasis added)
    >
    > [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
    > involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
    > Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
    > clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
    > alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
    > Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
    > Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
    > Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
    > had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
    > was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
    > involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
    > with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
    > sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
    > Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
    > also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
    > Webb hearing this appeal.
    >
    > [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
    > (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
    > reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
    > the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
    > with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
    >
    > [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
    > F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
    > reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
    > lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
    > was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
    > Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
    > Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
    >
    > [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
    > stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
    > of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
    > He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
    > entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
    > and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
    > to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
    > police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
    > enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
    > conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
    >
    > [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
    > apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
    > to recuse himself.
    >
    > [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
    > experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
    > the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
    > confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
    > Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
    >
    > [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
    > Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
    > that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
    > a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
    > both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
    > Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
    > begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
    > you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
    > was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
    > Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
    > for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
    > not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
    >
    >
    > III.               Issue
    >
    > [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
    > Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
    > in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
    > Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
    > legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
    >
    > IV.              Analysis
    >
    > A.                 Standard of Review
    >
    > [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
    > Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
    > be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
    > made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
    > Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
    > 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
    > this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
    > articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
    > [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
    > Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
    > prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
    > case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
    > the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
    > error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
    > law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
    > a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
    > if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
    > determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
    > (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
    >
    > [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
    > assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
    > must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
    > erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
    > interfere.
    >
    >
    > B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
    > Prothonotary’s Order?
    >
    > [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
    > paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
    > Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
    >
    > 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
    > addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
    > of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
    > in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
    > the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
    > the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
    > or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
    > does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
    > (…)
    >
    >
    > 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
    > provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
    > the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
    > Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
    > determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
    > A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
    > only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
    > best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
    > suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
    > [footnotes omitted].
    >
    >
    > [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
    > on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
    > that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
    > liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
    > who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
    > included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
    > the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
    > paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
    > identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
    > Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
    > para. 27).
    >
    >
    > [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
    > cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
    > identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
    > 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
    >
    >
    > [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
    > 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
    > determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
    > element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
    >
    > a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
    > conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
    >
    > b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
    > conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
    >
    > c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
    > officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
    > public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
    > Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
    > (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
    >
    > [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
    > material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
    > public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
    > Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
    > “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
    >
    > [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
    > in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
    > D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
    >
    > …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
    > assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
    > negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
    > “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
    > upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
    > conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
    > of process…
    >
    > To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
    > requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
    > out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
    > officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
    > office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
    > mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
    > allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
    > a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
    > (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
    >
    > [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
    > Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
    > absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
    >
    > [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
    > disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
    > basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
    > ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
    > the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
    > engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
    > conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
    > faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
    > the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
    > these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
    > non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
    > Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
    > the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
    > barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
    > supporting a cause of action.
    >
    > [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
    > allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
    > reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
    > Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
    > Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
    > find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
    > The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
    > amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
    >
    > V.                 Conclusion
    > [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
    > cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
    > dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
    > November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
    > without leave to amend.
    > "Wyman W. Webb"
    > J.A.
    > "David G. Near"
    > J.A.
    > "Mary J.L. Gleason"
    > J.A.
    >

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZqArRNshSM&ab_channel=Rogerstv 

     


    2018 New Brunswick Provincial Election Saint John Region Candidate Messages

    401 views
    Sep 20, 2018
    21Share
    88.1K subscribers
    Candidate messages for the following ridings in the 2018 New Brunswick Provincial Election: Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins Hampton Quispamsis Rothesay Saint John East Portland Simonds Saint John Harbour Saint John Lancaster Kings Centre Fundy-The-Isles-Saint John West Saint Croix

     

     

    https://globalnews.ca/news/4403536/new-brunswick-election-sussex-fundy-st-martins/ 

     

    New Brunswick election: Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins

    Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins
    19 out of 19 polls reporting
    •  
      Votes
      Percent
    • ✔︎ Elected
      Bruce Northrup
      3,816
      49.5%
      PC

    • Jim Bedford
      1,874
      24.3%
      People's Alliance

    • Ian Smyth
      1,212
      15.7%
      Liberals

    • Fred Harrison
      505
      6.5%
      Green

    • Dawna Robertson
      254
      3.3%
      NDP

    • David Raymond Amos
      54
      0.7%
      IND

     

     

    YO Premier Gallant thanks for having an ethical computer while you have a big Pow Wow way up North. Did the cry baby spin doctor Randy Mckeen get to go too?

      
    Add star 

    David Amos

    <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    AttachmentSun, Jul 24, 2016 at 2:51 AM
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    Hereto attached is the letter I discussed with Judge Southcott on
    January 11th, 2016 that has all you sneaky Liberals in such hot water
    ten years later  I bet the Progressive Conservatives still laughing
    about the letter I got from the mindless lawyer David Eidt N'esy Pas
    Teddy Flemming?

    Published on Jul 23, 2016
    Ted Flemming, Q.C.. MLA, Rothesay is asked of $40 fee to vote at P.C.
    Leadership in October!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RPSKM4bjOU

    A lawyer such as teddy baby Flemming knows as well as I that the
    Progressive Conservative Party has been dead since lawyers such as
    Petey Baby MacKay and Brian Mosher my brother in law' s law firm
    partner  back stabbed David Orchard and merger with Harper western
    wackos in 2003 before I can home and ran against one of the their
    lawyer Rob Moore in the election of the 38th Parliament.

    Everybody and his dog knows that as soon as my words were reported by
    the Kings County Record, one the Irving Empire's newsrags after I had
    crossed paths with the RCMP and Harper on his bus with Rob Moore and
    Elsie Wayne in Sussex NB on June 19th, 2004 the lawyer Bernie Lord and
    his minions in NB were not long barring me from Parliamentary
    Properties in NB and Chucky Leblanc was quick to report in the Fake
    Left Indy Media that your Deputy Rremier former Cpl Stevey Boy
    Horseman of the Fat Fred City Finest was investigating at that very
    same point in time. while you and your lawyer buddy Ellen Creighton
    were just starting law school CORRECT Brian Gallant?.

    BTW tell your pal Ellen Creighton that just because sneaky Librano
    lawyers block me it does not follow that I can't follow their tweets
    to their very sneaky CBC buddies before and after Elections that I am
    running in. Here is a little proof,

    https://twitter.com/creightonellen

    Ellen Creighton @CreightonEllen  Nov 13
    @mchardie Reminds me of big debate on Steve Paikin's blog post last
    year on women experts. Improvement w/ effort:
    http://www.informedopinions.org/steve-paikin-the-agenda-producers-prove-its-possible/



    At least you, Premier Gallant should notice that the lawyers for
    Astral Media got the same pile of my documents that the New Brunswick
    Securities Commission and the Commissioner of Federal Judical Affairs
    got right after your spin doctor Randy McKeen pissed me off when he
    denied that my name was on the ballot for the 39th Parliament. You
    must remember how McKeen whined a cried when Bell bought out Astral
    and he got shitcanned and bitched about the government he now works
    for Chucky Baby does CORRECT?

    Former KHJ Journalist Randy McKeen talks about local media

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tJHcjbCVV0

    BTW I posted the text of the letter to you Libranos within many blogs
    way back in 2006 after Harper won his first mandate and it still can
    be seen within some to this very day

    In 2008 your blogging butt buddy buddy Chucky Leblanc's Fake Left
    buddies in QSLS of Fredericton posted a picture of it as they had fun
    teasing me about being barred from the Legislative buildings and the
    cops stealing my Harley and all the attacks against my kids and I
    iwithin YouTube EH?

    The unionized bureaucrat bastards who support the NDP love to
    embarrass you similing bastard with my material CORRECT. If you
    disagree at least notice that they posted these these blogs not long
    before and just after the RCMP falsely arrested me in Fredericton.
    REMEMBER?

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-fat-fred-citys-finest.html

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/05/david-amos-high-noon-email-to-ottawa.html

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html


    P.S. Before I clicked send on this email I made certain that I called
    Ian Smyth and Pat Pelley to make certain that they knew who I was. I
    did so because I had never heard of either them until I researched the
    changing of the guard within the Librano Party and within Fundy Royal
    in particular. However I am a quick study Smyth did not pick up but
    Pat Pelley certainly did. The lady played dumb for awhile but in the
    end she confessed that she knew of me but she was too busy babysitting
    a granchild to bother talking to mean old me anymore. Perhaps she
    should call her pal David Lutz in Fundy royal and statrt lining up
    lawyers afer she gets this email N'esy Pas?.




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
    Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 17:43:36 +0000
    Subject: RE: The FSB, Federal Court file no T-1557-15 ,secret oaths to
    the British Queen and the evil Feds etc FYI I did call Moody's lawyer
    Goggins When he did not pick up I contacted Michael Adler an he did
    not return my call.
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
    Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
    and a response will be forthcoming.
    Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.

    Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
    Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
    et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
    Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.

    Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
    Mallory Fowler
    Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
    Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
    Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 11:54:21 +0000
    Subject: RE: Fw: Does the RCMP keep track of all the various email
    accounts and Youtube channels etc that their favourite shill in Sylvan
    Lake Dean Roger Ray aka Dirty Dicky Dean has?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
    Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
    and a response will be forthcoming.
    Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.

    Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
    Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
    et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
    Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.

    Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
    Mallory Fowler
    Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
    Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre

    http://nbliberal.ca/executive/

    Brian Gallant
    LEADER OF THE NEW BRUNSWICK LIBERAL ASSOCIATION

    Joel Reed
    PRESIDENT
    joel.b.reed@gmail.com

    Justin Trudeau
    LEADER OF THE LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA

    Bertin LeBlanc
    VICE-PRESIDENT PROVINCIAL
    bertanileblanc@bellaliant.net

    Anita Scott
    VICE-PRESIDENT FEDERAL

    Nathan Davis
    VICE-PRESIDENT (POLICY)
    nathanrdavis@hotmail.com

    Vacant
    VICE-PRESIDENT (COMMUNICATIONS)

    Tammy Rampersaud
    VICE-PRESIDENT (MEMBERSHIP)

    Monique LeBlanc, MLA
    REPRESENTING PROVINCIAL CAUCUS
    Monique.LeBlanc@gnb.ca

    Dominic LeBlanc, MP
    REPRESENTING FEDERAL CAUCUS
    dominic.leblanc@nb.aibn.com

    Yvon Landry
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, ACADIE-BATHURST
    landber@nbnet.nb.ca

    Rhéal LeBlanc
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, BEAUSÉJOUR
    eperlan@rogers.com

    Cindy Miles
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, FREDERICTON
    cindy.miles68@gmail.com

    Pat Pelley
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, FUNDY-ROYAL
    pat@pelley.com

    Gaétan Pelletier
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, MADAWASKA-RESTIGOUCHE
    curriemill@bellaliant.net

    Bill Sargent
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, MIRAMICHI
    s.sargent@rogers.com

    Mary Carpenter
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, MONCTON-RIVERVIEW-DIEPPE
    carpenter.marye@gmail.com

    Sharon McEachern
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NEW BRUNSWICK SOUTHWEST
    sher.mceachern@gmail.com

    Rod Borden
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, SAINT JOHN-ROTHESAY
    borden.rod@gmail.com

    Andre Beaulieu
    REGIONAL DIRECTOR, TOBIQUE–MACTAQUAC
    and.beaulieu@gmail.com

    Britt Dysart
    PAST PRESIDENT

    Monica Gaudet-Justason
    NEW BRUNSWICK WOMEN’S LIBERAL COMMISSION

    Brad Henstock
    NEW BRUNSWICK YOUNG LIBERAL COMMISSION

    Mary Carpenter
    NEW BRUNSWICK SENIORS LIBERAL COMMISSION

    Vicky Wallace Godbout
    NEW BRUNSWICK LIBERAL ASSOCIATION ABORIGINAL PEOPLES COMMISSION

    Elizabeth McEwen
    TREASURER

    Pete Belliveau
    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
    pete.belliveau@nbliberal.ca

    http://nbliberal.ca/nbla-staff/

    NEW BRUNSWICK LIBERAL ASSOCIATION
    715 Brunswick Street
    Fredericton NB E3B 1H8

    506-453-3950  or  1-800-442-4902
    Fax: 506-453-2476

    Pete Belliveau, Executive Director
    Email: pete.belliveau@nbliberal.ca


    http://nbliberal.ca/federal-riding-presidents/

    ACADIE-BATHURST
    Pierre Godin
    449, allée de la Tour Petit-Rocher, NB E8J 1L8
    783-2233

    BEAUSEJOUR
    Clermont Richard
    37 Savoie Street Richibucto NB E4W 4J1
    523-9201
    clem.richard1944@gmail.com

    FREDERICTON
    Corben McLean
    Fredericton NB
    506-292-5380
    c.mclean@royalarsenal.org

    FUNDY-ROYAL
    Ian R. Smyth
    506-433-8636
    ismyth37@gmail.com

    MADAWASKA-RESTIGOUCHE
    Lucien Leblanc
    506-987-1343
    lucien.leblanc@live.ca

    MIRAMICHI-GRAND LAKE
    Carrie Ross
    506-622-0152
    carries_multiplication@hotmail.com

    MONCTON-RIVERVIEW-DIEPPE
    Jean-Valmond LeBlanc
    118 Royal Oaks Blvd, Moncton NB E1H 3P2
    506-874-3382
    mrdliberalassoc@gmail.com

    NEW BRUNSWICK SOUTHWEST
    Garry Christie
    50 Kerr Lake Road Bocabec NB E5B 3L7
    506-529-4808
    garry.christie@bellaliant.net

    SAINT JOHN
    Patrick McCaffrey
    506-642-9669
    mccaffreypj@gmail.com

    TOBIQUE-MACTAQUAC
    Peter Cook
    506-375-6726
    pcook@valleyequipment.ca

    https://www.facebook.com/nbla.alnb/posts/944358775659206

    Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins Liberal Association Holiday Season Open House

    Event:
        Sussex-Fundy-St. Martins Liberal Association Holiday Season Open House
    Date:
        21/12/2015 7:00 pm
    Organizer:
        Paul Ready
    Phone:
        (506) 433-2817
    Updated:
        17/11/2015 3:48 pm

    Venue:
        Sussex and Area Seniors’ Centre
    Address:
        50 Perry Street, Sussex, NB, Canada

    Date: Monday, December 21, 2015
    When: 7pm – 9pm
    Where: Sussex and Area Seniors’ Centre, 50 Perry Street, Sussex
    Light Refreshments
    All Welcome


    http://www.cbc.ca/shift/columnists/home-grown/2012/12/14/tasty-cheese-from-armadale-farm/

    Friday December 14, 2012
    Tasty Cheese from Armadale Farm

    Ian Smyth married into a family of dutch cheesemakers -- six
    generations beginning in the Netherlands and for the past 20 years in
    Sussex. Now, Smyth makes all of Armadale's products himself. From
    gouda to feta to quark to cheddar -- he's your man! (Photo: Armadale
    Farm)

    http://sussexrotary.org/pictures/

    http://sussexrotary.org/club-news/

    Sussex Rotary Club News. ... Rotarian Ian Smyth introduced Andrew
    Clarke to the meeting on June 13, 2016.

    http://www.profitlearn.com/About-Us/Facilitators/Pelley-Consulting/

    Pelley Consulting
    pat@pelley.com
    C. 506-608-8213

    46 Dineen Drive
    Fredericton, New Brunswick
    Canada E3B 9W4
    Toll-free: 1-877-644-2267
    Fax: (506) 452-1890
     profitlearn@learnsphere.ca


    http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/executive_council/multimedia/mmrenderer.2014.09.2014-09-25_1.JPG.html

    Executive Council Office,  September 25, 2014 - Fredericton
    Transition team announced
    Premier-designate Brian Gallant announced a three-member transition
    team to liaise with the civil service in the period leading to the
    swearing-in of the new cabinet. From left: Len Hoyt; Ellen Creighton;
    Gallant and Don Ferguson.


    http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/contacts/dept_renderer.168.920.html#employees

    Premier (Premier's Office)
    675 King Street
    Fredericton
    P: (506) 453-2144


    BRIAN GALLANT,  (Premier)
    premier@gnb.ca

    STEPHEN HORSMAN,  (Deputy Premier)
    Stephen.horsman@gnb.ca

    GREG BYRNE,  (Principal Secretary)
    Principal Secretary (Branch)

    P: (506) 453-2144

    greg.byrne@gnb.ca


    MICHAEL PEARSON, (Director)
    Strategic Planning (Section)
    michael.pearson@gnb.ca

    MARTY MOCKLER,  (Senior Advisor)
    Stakeholder Engagement (Section)
    marty.mockler@gnb.ca


    http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/contacts/dept_renderer.140.1806.html#employees

    Minister of Families and Children (Minister's Office)
    551 King Street
    Fredericton
    P: (506) 453-2001

    STEPHEN HORSMAN ,  (Minister)
    Stephen.horsman@gnb.ca

    ROY WIGGINS, (Executive Assistant)
    Roy.wiggins@gnb.ca

    MCKEEN, RANDY (Departmental Assistant)
    randy.mckeen@gnb.ca

    http://thewave.ca/news/917120041/liberals-announce-transition-team

    Liberals Announce Transition Team
    Posted on Thursday, September 25, 2014 12:33 PM

    A three-member transition team has been formed by Premier designate
    Brian Gallant to work with the civil service in the lead up to the
    swearing in of the new provincial cabinet.

    The transition team is being chaired by lawyer Len Hoyt of
    Fredericton. He's a partner and chairs the board at McInnes Cooper,
    one of the largest law firms in this part of the country.

    The other two members are Don Ferguson who retired in 2012 as deputy
    minister of health and Ellen Creighton who worked as an investigator
    and advisor at the Competition Bureau before returning to New
    Brunswick in 2013 to become executive director of the New Brunswick
    Liberal Association. Part of her job will be to turn the party
    platform into government policies.


    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/liberal-lobbyist-hired-as-senior-deputy-minister-raising-conflict-fears-1.760530

    Liberal lobbyist hired as senior deputy minister, raising conflict fears

    CBC News Posted: Dec 19, 2008 5:32 PM AT

    A top Liberal insider and corporate lobbyist is now one of the
    province's most powerful bureaucrats.

    Doug Tyler, a former deputy premier, has been appointed the deputy
    minister of strategic priorities.

    Tyler is the vice-president of government relations for Saint
    John-based Revolution Strategy, where his government experience is a
    selling point on the company website.

    Earlier this week, the Opposition Conservatives argued in question
    period that Tyler's appointment to this job would create the
    perception of conflict of interest, because he'd be able to influence
    decisions that could benefit those he once was paid to represent.

    Opposition Leader David Alward said at the time that Tyler should be
    forced to disclose all of his former clients before taking the job so
    people would know his old allegiances.

    At the time, Graham said that was a personal attack on Tyler.

    Late on Friday, Graham's office issued a news release formally
    announcing Tyler's appointment and his Jan. 5 start date.

    Tyler was an MLA and cabinet minister in the former premier Frank
    McKenna years before losing his seat in the 1999 election.

    It's his more recent work that's been controversial. After helping run
    Shawn Graham's 2006 election campaign and acting on the three-person
    Liberal transition team, Tyler moved to Revolution as a
    government-affairs consultant.

    In his time as a paid lobbyist Tyler has represented a wind energy
    consortium trying to land a lucrative contract from NB Power without a
    formal bidding process.

    He got Graham to support the plan, but NB Power refused, saying it
    could not bypass the tendering process.

    Tyler also arranged meetings with provincial officials for another
    Revolution client, Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.  The federal Crown
    corporation wants to sell New Brunswick a new, untested model of a
    nuclear reactor.

    The deputy minister's position opened up recently when Chris Baker,
    who was Graham's chief of staff while in Opposition, left the
    government for the private sector. The sensitivity of the role of
    deputy minister of policy and priorities means that premiers typically
    pass the post to one of their top political lieutenants.

    The deputy minister is in charge of the cabinet agenda and shaping the
    premier's policy agenda.

    Graham had promised to create a lobbyist registry in the province. He
    backed away from that commitment this week, saying it was too
    expensive. Graham said he now wants to see if he can work with other
    regional governments to develop an inter-provincial lobbyist registry.


    Doug Tyler is a political figure in the province of New Brunswick, Canada.

    Tyler was a member of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick from
    the 1987 election until his defeat in the 1999 election. He served in
    the cabinet from 1991 to 1999 overseeing various ministries, including
    a stint as Deputy Premier under Camille Thériault's leadership.

    Tyler was campaign manager for Paul Duffie's unsuccessful bid for the
    New Brunswick Liberal Party leadership, campaign manager for the New
    Brunswick Liberals in the 2003 election, co-chair for the Liberal
    Party of Canada's campaign in New Brunswick in the 2004 federal
    election and co-compaign manager for the New Brunswick Liberals in the
    2006 provincial election.

    From 2004 to 2006 he served as chief of staff to New Brunswick MP Andy
    Scott in his role as Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs. On
    September 20, 2006, Premier-designate of New Brunswick Shawn Graham
    appointed Tyler to chair his transition team.

    In his first press conference as Premier, on October 3, 2006 Shawn
    Graham said the Doug Tyler was serving as his acting chief of staff.
    He was replaced by former cabinet colleague Bernard Thériault who
    became Graham's first permanent chief of staff on October 30, 2006. He
    has worked at the Saint John-based public relations firm Revolution
    Strategy.[1]



    http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/contacts/dept_renderer.153.831.202071.html#employees

    New Brunswick Jobs Board Secretariat (Secretariat)
    675 King Street
    Fredericton
    P: (506) 453-8444

    DAVID CAMPBELL,  (Chief Economist)
    david.campbell@gnb.ca

    SUSAN HOLT (Chief, Business Partnerships)
    susan.holt@gnb.ca
    http://davidwcampbell.com/2008/12/the-doug-tyler-affair/

    The Doug Tyler Affair
    Posted on December 21, 2008 by David Campbell   

    The mystique.  They mystery.  A ‘lobbyist’ now working for the
    government.  Ooooooh.  The Opposition is some angry that Doug Tyler,
    former McKenna Minister has gone from lobbyist to senior government
    position.  As if that hasn’t happened before.  New Brunswick is a
    small province.  Ex Cabinet ministers many times end up with nice
    government jobs (just ask David Alward’s predecessor).

    Of course I believe that senior government appointments should be
    vetted for conflict of interest but that’s tough in a small province.
    One thing I can say from 20 years of working in and around the system.
    There is definitely ‘lobbying’ that goes on but I have never witnessed
    it rise to the level of corruption.  I am not saying that bribes,
    payoffs, blackmail, etc. don’t happen but I have never heard about it.

    There needs to be systems in place to ensure that government money is
    spent appropriately (and that includes who gets hired) but I am
    equally if not more concerned about having accountability systems to
    ensure that government money is spent effectively.

    It’s an outrage with former Minister Norm Betts spends $90 for burger
    in Boston but there isn’t even a whiff of interest in whether or not
    the tens of thousands of taxpayer dollars spent on that trip to Boston
    was an effective use of money.

    You could say the same thing about all departments of government.
    There needs to be at least as much accountability related to outcomes
    (results) as related to the processes (how the money was spent).  It
    kind of misses the point to be outraged about NB Power bonuses (a
    0.02% cost item) and hardly even mention the actual success or failure
    of NB Power.  That is not the best example because the TJ has done a
    pretty good job of reporting on the activities of NB Power. I’d double
    the Deputy Minister salaries in a heartbeat if it resulted in a
    doubling of the effectiveness of their departments.

    This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged accountability, Doug
    Tyler, Economic development.

    21 Responses to The Doug Tyler Affair

    mikel says: December 21, 2008 at 2:24 pm       

        Keep in mind there are LOTS of ‘policies’ that are ‘routine’ in NB
    that would be a conflict of interest anywhere else simply because
    there is more media elsewhere. Far bigger than that issue is how many
    Irving employee’s end up in high government departments and often even
    go back to Irving. Charles Leblanc has sometimes made that an issue
    but nobody has really gotten into it.

        And even right off the top of my head we can add the liberal deal
    in Mactaquac as well as the new plaza on Fredericton’s watershed, also
    shady liberal deals that have the support of the party. I’m sure NBT
    could add many others, including his pet peeve, the cancellation of
    the inquiry into the Caissie Populaire that has BOTH parties
    fingerprints all over it. Remember, New Brunswick is a FAR more closed
    government than most. And that’s without ANY investigation. Being
    small doesn’t justify conflicts of interest, and people have a VERY
    misguided sense of what senior bureaucrats actually do. Here the view
    of the man in the street is very correct, that senior bureaucrats
    simply don’t DESERVE those salaries. Unlike the private sector their
    jobs seldom depend on performance, although in the private sector
    thats often rarely true as well.

        Anybody who has worked in business or government knows damn well
    that the hard workers out there don’t do it because of the money.
    There’s a reason the stereotype in movies exists where the secretary
    is the brains behind the outfit. Charles Leblanc could probably do a
    better job as head of NB communications, but certainly not the ‘type’
    of job that government’s want, which is why the ‘best’ workers within
    government are often the worst for the public utility (or just the
    public).

    Anonymous says: December 21, 2008 at 5:29 pm   

        I had thought that the NB Power bonuses were to be tied to a
    variety of performance benchmarks. The biggest of these was the
    timeliness and budget performance of the reactor retrofit.

        I think the sensible thing in Doug Tyler’s case is to provide a
    statutory requirement of a six month cooling off period, followed by
    the revelation of former clients. I don’t think this would be a
    revolutionary approach to lobbyist regulation in North America.

        You can obviously argue that the addition of Doug Tyler to the
    Liberal Government is a positive thing for New Brunswick. I also
    imagine Mr Tyler had exactly the same connections and direct lines to
    senior Government officials last week as a lobbyist as he does this
    week as a DM. That’s not the issue. The issue is whether New
    Brunswickers should know who was paying for his services before he
    began officially advising Government.

    Rob says:       December 21, 2008 at 5:29 pm   

        Anon above was me, by the way

    Anonymous says: December 21, 2008 at 5:33 pm   

        Good post. Did we expect a Conservative to get the post? These
    appointments happen everywhere; they are simply more public in NB due
    to our size.

        The more important question to ask is what direction will policy
    take now; more shelved reports or meaningful strategic action?

    Vincerolly says: December 21, 2008 at 7:39 pm   

        The casual tolerance of unethical political practices under the
    guise of New Brunswick’s small size is a gross indictment of the
    degree to which we consider these practices to be acceptable.

        In fact, there are expenditure management systems, accountability
    frameworks and ethics guidelines that apply equally to all political
    jurisdictions, regardless of size.

        Only when we decide that we will no longer tolerate unethical
    practices as a rule, and not simply on an exception basis, will it be
    possible to speak of a time when these shameful practices could cease.

    David Campbell says:    December 21, 2008 at 7:47 pm   

        I am not sure how you get shameful out of this. When berard lord
    made his old law partner deputy minister – is that shameful? I still
    think we have to be able to differentiate between old partisans
    getting plum jobs that they are at least on paper qualified for – as
    Tyler is.

    mikel says: December 21, 2008 at 10:31 pm       

        Of course the Bernard Lord case is ‘shameful’ as well. Again, go
    look at what a Deputy Minister DOES. There are tons of books in the
    public administration section of your library written by bureaucrats
    of all stripes. To say that somebody who was a lobbyist for specific
    issues or a company has the ‘paper qualifications’ to be a deputy
    minister is the ‘casual tolerance’ the above poster is talking about.
    However, this is how many former commonwealth countries operate, the
    idea is still that the ‘elite’ are ‘more qualified’ based on the fact
    that they know ‘the rules’ and the jargon. As we saw with the
    Venezuela deal, knowing rules and jargon doesn’t equip one
    (necessarily) with brains-in that case doing a retrofit which only has
    one source of product (which tons of commentators were pointing out
    during the retrofit).

        If you look around at most countries there isn’t even a POSITION
    known as ‘deputy minister’. For a ‘second in command’ you’d think at
    least it would have to be somebody who is ELECTED. But again, that’s
    Canada’s system. You only need look next door to Maine and notice that
    FAR more positions are run by ballot, not by who somebody thinks
    ‘looks good on paper’. I didn’t even follow the above comment, is
    somebody asserting that you don’t even know who he was a lobbyist
    FOR?? And now he’s a deputy minister? IF that’s true, that goes FAR
    beyond simply shameful, that’s downright third worldien.

    mikel says: December 21, 2008 at 10:36 pm       

        Sorry, forgot to mention to Vince’s point-just because people
    aren’t rioting in the streets is no reason to think that its ‘casual
    acceptance’. The simple reality is that there is simply nothing people
    can do about it. What’s the alternative? Set off bombs? This is voter
    turnout is plummeting. NB is a little different because it has
    virtually no immigration, and an aging population who still vote out
    of a sense of duty. That’s rapidly changing in the world, you can look
    at Ontario’s recent election, Alberta’s, even Canada’s. It’s always
    interesting when CBC reports on stuff like this because then you can
    get a general sense-and it isn’t pretty. Stuff like this is very
    similar to what forced Britain to bring in ‘responsible government’,
    at least a little of it. But it takes quite a bit of work and
    organization to make radical changes in how governments operate, and
    we haven’t seen much of that, which means of course such things will
    continue.

    David from Moncton says: December 21, 2008 at 10:40 pm 

        Policies and Priorities is a very partisan position. It’s not like
    Tyler is being appointed to Deputy Minister of Justice or Health or
    even BNB. This is the senior civil servant who helps keep the
    Executive Council on track by thinking big picture rather than
    reacting to the latest newspaper-inspired crisis. The position is
    ill-suited to a professionally neutral public servant. It needs to be
    staffed by someone who can look the premier in the eye and say,
    “that’s not a good idea” rather than being another “Yes Man or Woman”.

    Vincerolly says: December 21, 2008 at 11:36 pm 

        David, I regret that either you cannot see the conflict of
    interest or alternately that your position may be that there’s nothing
    to be done. Mikel also seems to be saying that in the absence of
    measures to address these conflicts we should simply capitulate to
    unethical comportment. Riot in the streets? The appropriate
    alternative to setting off bombs in response to these ethical
    challenges would, at a minimum, involve discussing how these decisions
    are wrong.

        And when we attempt to shrug off our responsibilities as citizens
    to speak out against ethical wrongdoing — even if it happens with
    regularity (or perhaps because it does), it is shameful indeed.

        I don’t recall that a reasoned response to challenges to
    accountability is “well, what are you going to do?”

    David Campbell says:     December 22, 2008 at 2:22 am   

        It is certainly possible that I have shrugged my shoulders a bit
    because I focus – maybe more than I should – on outcomes rather than
    processes.

        Maybe all DM appointments should be vetted in the way a cabinet
    minister is vetted in the U.S.?

    Anonymous says: December 22, 2008 at 12:40 pm   

        This is laughable. Of course such an appointment will be someone
    that is a trusted party faithful and of course they will have had
    prior business or interaction with government. You guys are buying
    into the hype Alward is trying to fabricate. If he gets in do you
    expect him to appoint a Liberal?

        Good opposition would be scrutinizing his philosphies and strategy
    and exploring the priorities he intends to set. Will it be economic
    development or potholes? Will it be our worst education system or
    moose fencing? Will it be esculating health care costs or auto
    insurance rates? Will it be tax policy or internet access? If he gets
    the priorities right, we can be thankful for this appointment.

    Rob says:       December 22, 2008 at 12:55 pm   

        I don’t think his party membership is the issue. The issue is that
    last week special interests were paying him to convince government to
    change course in a way beneficial to those special interests. Now, Mr
    Tyler is being paid by government to tell them how best to change
    course.

        Will consideration be given to those who buttered his bread
    before? Probably not, but all doubt could be removed with proactive
    disclosure.

    Vincerolly says: December 22, 2008 at 5:03 pm   

        David, your suggestion that DMs (and perhaps other high ranking
    appointments) should be vetted publicly has real merit. Of course it
    would slow down the machinery of government, and there would be those
    who would resist any brake on government operations. But an open
    review would have the merit of allowing for political discussion, not
    to remove ALL ambiguity, but to allow for at least the prospect that a
    conflict of interest would meet with the full glare of the public
    interest.

        We should not dismiss talented, committed and ethical individuals
    merely on the grounds of their partisan affiliation. David rightly
    points out that many, and perhaps in some situations, most candidates
    for a patronage post may have a partisan history. That in itself
    should not disqualify an individual from serving in the public
    interest. However, the public should be aware of that partisan
    affiliation and there should be a forum to determine whether it
    constitutes a conflict of interest. This would tend to hold elected
    officials more accountable than the current “method”.

        Surely when the ends justify the means, the public cannot be well served.

    Anonymous says: December 23, 2008 at 8:49 am   

        AS NB is such a ‘Small’ province why is there a need for Deputy Ministers?

    Bev says:       December 24, 2008 at 3:00 pm   

        It is interesting to see some of the comments on this article. I
    wander how many of the negative posters has shown up chastising
    Stephen Harper for his senate appointments.

        Mr. Alward is firing blanks trying to stir the citizens of this
    province up but after being part of the government that rehired 5
    defeated ministers/mlas when they got defeated he has no reason to
    call Mr. Tyler’s appointment into question. The sad thing or perhaps
    the good thing is that Mr. Tyler has more experience then the other
    five Bernard Lord and David Alward hired.

        I admit that I do know Doug Tyler but I will also say that he is a
    honest person and will represent Shawn Graham’s government to the
    highest and with fairness.

        Remember, David Alward was chosen as a party leader by only
    beating an unknown candidate by fewer then 260 switched votes. The
    heavy weights, Robichaud, Volpe, and others saw the light and
    chickened out and left Alward to fend for himself.

        Mr. Alward, having been a minister in a government that did
    nothing in their last six years in office and filled so many positions
    with defeated members that the government’s seam were busting, only
    has to look in the mirror to see what is wrong with the PC party.

        Most likely Mr. Alward’s biggest regret is that he does not have
    anybody that could come near to Mr. Tyler’s experience, that he can
    call on.

    Anonymous says: December 25, 2008 at 2:14 pm   

        Tyler will at least be providing input in an official capacity.
    Hopefully this is a sign of the government finding itself and creating
    its own identity.

        The negative backlash against people merely because of their
    politics is part of the reason good people are avoiding the process.
    We should be examining principles, policies and strategies of such
    individuals. Instead we worry about politics; he is a long time
    liberal and of course he has had prior dealings and interactions with
    governments. As long as they were legal, we should drop the BS and
    start working to move this province out of last place in so many
    performance indicators.

    mikel says: December 26, 2008 at 6:23 pm       

        People have a really misguided view of political machinery. It’s
    not like government was up against a wall and ‘needed somebody
    yesterday’. But as far as partisanship goes, again, the job of
    political opposition is to oppose. Lots here are questioning the
    decision, at the very least the way it was made, and the opposition’s
    job is to give such opposition a voice in the legislature. Alward was
    never leader of the PC’s before, so the argument can’t be made about
    how he handled PC decisions. Since both parties have been around for
    decades, the argument can go back and back and back that because Party
    X did such and such they have no ‘authority’ to make criticisms.
    That’s of course ludicrous, Mr. Alward is doing his job, and the
    criticism would be far more credible if he didn’t say anything, or if
    he congratulated the liberals on their choice. That, essentially, was
    New Brunswick in the late eighties and early nineties. I’ll repeat, I
    was around during those years and that’s when the seeds of real
    poverty began and there were just as few long term success stories as
    under Mr. Lord’s government. An opposition actually opposing is
    necessary in a system that doesn’t give any power to the people.

    Anonymous says: December 27, 2008 at 10:39 am   

        Mikel just helped explain why so many have become dis-engaged from
    politics; opposing for the sake of opposing. No debate, no better
    alternatives, no tweaking or fine tuning to optimize, no consistent
    strategy or policy. Just simple if government says white, opposition
    says black.

        This was entertaining when the NDP did it knowing they would not
    be put to task forming a government. It is disturbing when a
    legitimate contender does it.

    mikel says: December 27, 2008 at 9:21 pm       

        No, what I explained was why ANYBODY is still ‘engaged in
    politics’. For the vast majority such stories as these are so common
    that they are not even worth thinking about. But for ‘alternatives’,
    the opposition is in no position to offer them-if some reporter asked
    them they probably WOULD have an alternative suggestion, probably just
    as partisan.

        That’s the benefit of ‘coalition’ governments, then at least there
    isn’t just black and white. The ‘opposing for the sake of opposing’ is
    a result of the electoral system-its a symptom not a disease. That,
    again, is why so many are disconnected from politics. Even here there
    are lots of comments by people who are at least nominally interested,
    but in two days this blog will be gone with no effect. THAT is why
    people get disconnected-because there is no point in being connected.

    Anonymous says:January 8, 2009 at 9:52 pm       

        As a New Brunswicker who has lived away for many years I will
    offer you this thought. The tacit approval of this kind of collusion
    does not go unnoticed by people across the country. Does it happen
    everywhere? Sure. However, when it is seen to happen in New Brunswick
    it adds to an already insidious perception of NB as a corrupt
    backwater run by Irving Oil and a bunch of yahoos. Again, I was raised
    in NB and I know things are more complex than this and that it is
    comparatively unfair but try telling that to a “liberal” private
    school snob from Upper Canada. I had always hoped that NB would get
    it’s sh*t together and move towards a more participatory style
    democracy. Sadly it seems the wolves still run the hen house and I
    will have to continue to bear the condescending remarks on my
    birthplace. Poor me :(

    5 attachmentsScan and download all attachments

    jan 20th fredericton.pdf
    118K View as HTMLScan and download

    David Eidt.pdf
    555K View as HTMLScan and download

    nb securities commission.pdf
    166K View as HTMLScan and download

    Federal Court Commissioner.pdf
    102K View as HTMLScan and download

    Tanker Contemptable.pdf
    66K View as HTMLScan and download

     

    Russia Breaks Diplomatic Ties With NATO

    $
    0
    0

    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/18/world/europe/russia-nato.html?action=click&module=RelatedLinks&pgtype=Article 

     

    Russia Breaks Diplomatic Ties With NATO

    Moscow’s decision to end its diplomatic mission to the alliance will end a long, post-Cold War experiment in building trust between militaries.

    MOSCOW — Russia plans to cease its diplomatic engagement with the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the Russian foreign minister said on Monday, in the latest sign of unraveling relations between Moscow and the West.

    Though significant on a diplomatic level, the announcement was not apparently accompanied by any military moves by Russia threatening European security. And Moscow still maintains diplomatic relations with the individual governments in the alliance.

    The decision will end a post-Cold War experiment, never very successful, in building trust between Russia and the Western alliance, established decades ago to contain the Soviet Union, which officials in Moscow accused of later encroaching on former Soviet territory.

    By early next month, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said, Russia will halt the activities of its representative office at NATO headquarters in Brussels and withdraw diplomatic credentials from emissaries of the alliance working in Moscow.

    NATO’s response was muted. “We have taken note of the decision by Russia to suspend the work of its diplomatic mission,” a spokeswoman, Oana Lungescu, said. “NATO’s policy toward Russia remains consistent. We have strengthened our deterrence and defense in response to Russia’s aggressive actions, while at the same time we remain open to dialogue.”

    The breakoff of diplomatic ties also comes as President Biden is seeking to strengthen the European alliance after former President Donald J. Trump denigrated members as freeloaders on American military spending and threatened to withdraw.

    Relations between Moscow and the West have been strained for years, but the immediate impetus for the Russian move was a spy scandal.

    Earlier this month, NATO ordered eight Russian diplomats to leave Belgium by Nov. 1, saying they were undeclared intelligence officers. The alliance also reduced the size of the Russian representative office.

    In response, Mr. Lavrov said Russia’s entire diplomatic mission would leave by Nov. 1, or a few days after that date.

    “Because of NATO’s targeted steps, proper conditions for elemental diplomatic activity don’t exist,” he said. “In response to NATO’s actions, we are halting the work of our permanent representation to NATO, including the work of the main military envoy.”

    Relations with the alliance had in any case long ago gone off the rails, he said. NATO had already twice reduced the size of the Russian delegation, in 2015 and 2018, he said. “On the military level there are absolutely no contacts taking place,” he said.

    He said NATO had set up a “prohibitive regime” for Russian diplomats in Brussels by banning them from its headquarters building. Without visiting the building, he said, they could not maintain ties with alliance officials.

    Mr. Lavrov suggested the expulsions of Russian diplomats had come as an unwelcome surprise, as he had met in New York just days earlier with the alliance’s secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, and discussed de-escalating tensions.

    “He in every way underscored the honest, as he said, interest in the North Atlantic alliance in normalizing relations with the Russian Federation,” Mr. Lavrov said.

    NATO could still convey diplomatic messages to Russia’s embassy in Brussels, if necessary, Mr. Lavrov said.

    In addition to diplomatic frictions, military tensions have also escalated in recent years, including last spring when Russian troops massed along Ukraine’s border, ostensibly for a military exercise.

    In the immediate post-Cold War era, Russia had claimed a moral high ground in relations with NATO. Moscow, Russians noted, had dismantled its alliance of that era, the Warsaw Pact, while NATO in contrast expanded into former Soviet and East Bloc nations. Russia has since initiated new military alliances of its own, with former Soviet states and with China.

    Relations were also strained by NATO’s intervention in the Balkan wars in the 1990s against Serbia, a Russian ally.

    Russia responded, for a time, by dispatching an outspoken nationalist, Dmitry O. Rogozin, now the director of Russia’s space program, as its emissary to the alliance in Brussels, where he became a thorn in the side of NATO officials.

    The problems simmered on. NATO’s view of Russia dimmed further after Russia intervened militarily in Ukraine in 2014. Ukraine is not a NATO member, but Russia’s aggressive moves there revived worries of an expansionist Kremlin agenda in Eastern Europe.

    In announcing the halt to Russia’s diplomatic relations with NATO, Mr. Lavrov said Monday that the alliance didn’t show any interest in “equal dialogue or joint work.” He said there was no need to “go on pretending that in the foreseeable future anything will change.”

    Monika Pronczuk contributed reporting.

     

     


    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/31/world/europe/biden-putin-russia-united-states.html

     

    Rivals on World Stage, Russia and U.S. Quietly Seek Areas of Accord

    There have been a series of beneath-the-surface meetings between the two countries as the Biden administration applies a more sober approach to relations with the Kremlin.

    President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia and President Biden in June in Geneva. The summit set off a series of contacts between the two countries.Credit...Doug Mills/The New York Times

    MOSCOW — It might seem as if little has changed for Russia and the United States, two old adversaries seeking to undercut each other around the world.

    Russian nuclear-capable missiles have been spotted on the move near Ukraine, and the Kremlin has signaled the possibility of a new intervention there. It has tested hypersonic cruise missiles that skirt American defenses and cut all ties with the American-led NATO alliance. After a summer pause, ransomware attacks emanating from Russian territory have resumed, and this past week, Microsoft revealed a new Russian cybersurveillance campaign.

    Since President Biden took office nine months ago, the United States has imposed sweeping new sanctions on Russia, continued to arm and train Ukraine’s military and threatened retaliatory cyberattacks against Russian targets. The American Embassy in Moscow has virtually stopped issuing visas.

    As world leaders met at the Group of 20 summit this weekend in Rome, Mr. Biden did not even get the chance to hash things out with his Russian counterpart face to face because President Vladimir V. Putin, citing coronavirus concerns, attended the event remotely.

    Yet beneath the surface brinkmanship, the two global rivals are now also doing something else: talking.

    The summit between Mr. Biden and Mr. Putin in June in Geneva touched off a series of contacts between the two countries, including three trips to Moscow by senior Biden administration officials since July, and more meetings with Russian officials on neutral ground in Finland and Switzerland.

    An image from a video released by the Russian Defense Ministry Press Service on Oct. 4, supposedly showing a new Zircon hypersonic cruise missile being launched by a submarine of the Russian Navy from the Barents Sea.
    Credit...Russian Defense Ministry Press Service, via Associated Press

    There is a serious conversation underway on arms control, the deepest in years. The White House’s top adviser for cyber and emerging technologies, Anne Neuberger, has engaged in a series of quiet, virtual meetings with her Kremlin counterpart. Several weeks ago — after an extensive debate inside the American intelligence community over how much to reveal — the United States turned over the names and other details of a few hackers actively launching attacks on America.

    Now, one official said, the United States is waiting to see if the information results in arrests, a test of whether Mr. Putin was serious when he said he would facilitate a crackdown on ransomware and other cybercrime.

    Officials in both countries say the flurry of talks has so far yielded little of substance but helps to prevent Russian-American tensions from spiraling out of control.

    A senior administration official said the United States was “very cleareyed” about Mr. Putin and the Kremlin’s intentions but thinks it can work together on issues like arms control. The official noted that Russia had been closely aligned with the United States on restoring the Iran nuclear deal and, to a lesser degree, dealing with North Korea, but acknowledged that there were many other areas where the Russians “try to throw a wrench into the works.”

    Mr. Biden’s measured approach has earned plaudits in Russia’s foreign policy establishment, which views the White House’s increased engagement as a sign that America is newly prepared to make deals.

    “Biden understands the importance of a sober approach,” said Fyodor Lukyanov, a prominent Moscow foreign policy analyst who advises the Kremlin. “The most important thing that Biden understands is that he won’t change Russia. Russia is the way it is.”

    For the White House, the talks are a way to try to head off geopolitical surprises that could derail Mr. Biden’s priorities — competition with China and a domestic agenda facing myriad challenges. For Mr. Putin, talks with the world’s richest and most powerful nation are a way to showcase Russia’s global influence — and burnish his domestic image as a guarantor of stability.

    Russian troops boarding a transport plane during drills in April in Taganrog, Russia, about 100 miles from the Ukrainian border.
    Credit...Reuters

    “What the Russians hate more than anything else is to be disregarded,” said Fiona Hill, who served as the top Russia expert in the National Security Council under President Donald J. Trump, before testifying against him in his first impeachment hearings. “Because they want to be a major player on the stage, and if we’re not paying that much attention to them they are going to find ways of grabbing our attention.”

    For the United States, however, the outreach is fraught with risk, exposing the Biden administration to criticism that it is too willing to engage with a Putin-led Russia that continues to undermine American interests and repress dissent.

    European officials worry Russia is playing hardball amid the region’s energy crisis, holding out for the approval of a new pipeline before delivering more gas. New footage, circulated on social media on Friday, showed missiles and other Russian weaponry on the move near Ukraine, raising speculation about the possibility of new Russian action against the country.

    In the United States, it is the destructive nature of Russia’s cybercampaign that has officials particularly concerned. Microsoft’s disclosure of a new campaign to get into its cloud services and infiltrate thousands of American government, corporation and think tank networks made clear that Russia was ignoring the sanctions Mr. Biden issued after the Solar Winds hack in January.

    But it also represented what now looks like a lasting change in Russian tactics, according to Dmitri Alperovitch, the chairman of the research group Silverado Policy Accelerator. He noted that the move to undermine America’s cyberspace infrastructure, rather than just hack into individual corporate or federal targets, was “a tactical direction shift, not a one-off operation.”

    Russia has already found ways to use Mr. Biden’s desire for what the White House refers to as a more “stable and predictable” relationship to exact concessions from Washington.

    Microsoft blew the whistle on a new cybersurveillance campaign conducted this past week.
    Credit...Swayne B. Hall/Associated Press

    When Victoria Nuland, a top State Department official, sought to visit Moscow for talks at the Kremlin recently, the Russian government did not immediately agree. Seen in Moscow as one of Washington’s most influential Russia hawks, Ms. Nuland was on a blacklist of people barred from entering the country.

    But the Russians offered a deal. If Washington approved a visa for a top Russian diplomat who had been unable to enter the United States since 2019, then Ms. Nuland could come to Moscow. The Biden administration took the offer.

    Ms. Nuland’s conversations in Moscow were described as wide ranging, but in the flurry of talks between the United States and Russia, there are clearly areas the Kremlin does not want to discuss: Russia’s crackdown on dissent and the treatment of the imprisoned opposition leader Aleksei A. Navalny have gone largely unaddressed, despite the disapproval that Mr. Biden voiced on the matter this year.

    While Mr. Biden will not see Mr. Putin in person at the Group of 20 summit in Rome or at the Glasgow climate summit, Dmitri S. Peskov, Mr. Putin’s spokesman, said in October that another meeting this year “in one format or another” between the two presidents was “quite realistic.”

    “Biden has been very successful in his signaling toward Russia,” said Kadri Liik, a Russia specialist at the European Council on Foreign Relations in Berlin. “What Russia wants is the great power privilege to break rules. But for that, you need rules to be there. And like it or not the United States is still an important player among the world’s rule setters."

    Aleksei A. Navalny, the Russia opposition leader, in a Moscow court in February.
    Credit...Kirill Kudryavtsev/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

    The most notable talks between Russian and American officials have been on what the two call “strategic stability” — a phrase that encompasses traditional arms control and the concerns that new technology, including the use of artificial intelligence to command weapons systems, could lead to accidental war or reduce the decision time for leaders to avoid conflict. Wendy Sherman, the deputy secretary of state, has led a delegation on those issues, and American officials describe them as a “bright spot” in the relationship.

    Working groups have been set up, including one that will discuss “novel weapons” like Russia’s Poseidon, an autonomous nuclear torpedo.

    While Pentagon officials say that China’s nuclear modernization is their main long-term threat, Russia remains the immediate challenge. “Russia is still the most imminent threat, simply because they have 1,550 deployed nuclear weapons,” Gen. John E. Hyten, who will retire in a few weeks as the vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters on Thursday

    An annual military show outside Moscow in August.
    Credit...Pavel Golovkin/Associated Press

    In other contacts, John F. Kerry, Mr. Biden’s climate envoy, spent four days in Moscow in July. And Robert Malley, the special envoy for Iran, held talks in Moscow in September.

    Aleksei Overchuk, a Russian deputy prime minister, met with Ms. Sherman and Jake Sullivan, Mr. Biden’s national security adviser — talks that Mr. Overchuk described as “very good and honest” in comments to Russian news media.

    Mr. Putin, finely attuned to the subtleties of diplomatic messaging after more than 20 years in power, welcomes such gestures of respect. Analysts noted that he recently also sent his own signal: Asked by an Iranian guest at a conference in October whether Mr. Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan heralded the decline of American power, Mr. Putin countered by praising Mr. Biden’s decision and rejecting the notion that the chaotic departure would have a long-term effect on America’s image.

    “Time will pass and everything will fall into place, without leading to any cardinal changes,” Mr. Putin said. “The country’s attractiveness doesn’t depend on this, but on its economic and military might.”

    Anton Troianovski reported from Moscow, and David E. Sanger from Washington.

     

     

    https://news.usni.org/2021/07/01/more-nato-ships-enter-black-sea-while-tensions-with-russia-simmer

     

    More NATO Ships Enter Black Sea While Tensions With Russia Simmer


    ITS Fasan, SNMG2 flagship cross under Istanbul strait on July 1, 2021. NATO Photo

    The flagship of Standing NATO Maritime Group 2 entered the Black Sea on Thursday with two more alliance warships set to join the Sea Breeze exercises that started earlier this week, NATO announced.

    Frigate ITS Virginio Fasan (F 591) passed through the Bosphorus headed for the Black Sea with a Turkish frigate and will join with a Romanian warship, according to ship spotters in Turkey.

    “During [Fasan’s] deployment in the Black Sea, and after the joining of TCG Barbaros and ROS Regina Maria, SNMG2 will participate in bilateral U.S.-Ukraine exercise Sea Breeze,” reads a statement from NATO.

    To date, NATO ships that have entered the Black Sea are the U.S. guided-missile destroyers USS Laboon (DDG-58) and USS Ross (DDG-71), French diving support ship FS Alizé A645, British guided-missile destroyer HMS Defender (D63), patrol vessel HMS Trent (P224) and the Dutch frigate HNLMS Evertsen (F805).

    The recent ships’ transits into the Black Sea follow last week’s clashes between Russian military forces and Defender and Evertsen. While transiting the Black Sea off the coast of Crimea, Russian fighters and patrol vessels operated close to Defender while Russian forces warned the destroyer away from the vicinity of the coast, USNI News reported at the time.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2kG2R1GY0UI&ab_channel=USNINewsVideo

     


    Earlier this week, images showing Russian fighters with anti-ship missiles flying over Evertsen in the Black Sea were released by the Dutch defense ministry. Dutch Defense minister Ank Bijleveld-Schouten called the Russian actions against Evertsen“irresponsible.”

    Evertsen has every right to sail there,” Bijleveld-Schouten said, according to SkyNews.
    “There is no justification whatsoever for this kind of aggressive act, which also unnecessarily increases the chance of accidents.”

    Earlier this week, when asked about the incidents on a television show, Russian president Vladimir Putin said the intent of the alliance ships in the Black Sea was to help establish U.S. bases in the region, according to a translation of the exchange by the BBC.

    “They know they cannot win this conflict: we would be fighting for our own territory; we didn’t travel thousands of miles to get to their borders, they did,” he said.

    The exercises and the Russian response come after unknown entities have falsified the automatic identification system (AIS) tracks for NATO warships to show them near the Russian-held territory of Crimea.


    USNI News reported the automatic identification system (AIS) tracks of Defender and Evertsen were falsified on June 18 to show the warships off of the Russian naval base in Sevastopol in Crimea, while a track for USS Ross (DDG-71) was falsified on June 29 operating about 5 miles from the Crimean coast.

     

    Sam LaGrone

    About Sam LaGrone

    Sam LaGrone is the editor of USNI News. He has covered legislation, acquisition and operations for the Sea Services since 2009 and spent time underway with the U.S. Navy, U.S. Marine Corps and the Canadian Navy.

     

     

    https://www.reuters.com/world/wide-disagreements-low-expectations-biden-putin-meet-2021-06-15/ 

     

    Far apart at first summit, Biden and Putin agree to steps on cybersecurity, arms control

    By and

    Summary

    • Biden asks Putin about pipeline ransomware attacks
    • Three-hour talks described as professional rather than friendly
    • U.S., Russia to send their ambassadors back to their capitals
    • First U.S.-Russian summit since Biden took office in January

    GENEVA, June 16 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden and Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed on Wednesday to begin cybersecurity and arms control talks at a summit that highlighted their discord on those issues, human rights and Ukraine.

    In their first meeting since he took office in January, Biden asked Putin how he would feel if a ransomware attack hit Russia's oil network, a pointed question making reference to the May shutdown of a pipeline that caused disruptions and panic-buying along the U.S. East Coast.

    While Biden stressed that he did not make threats during the three-hour meeting, he said he outlined U.S. interests, including cybersecurity, and made clear to Putin that the United States would respond if Russia infringed on those concerns.

    Both men used careful pleasantries to describe their talks in a lakeside Swiss villa, with Putin calling them constructive and without hostility and Biden saying there was no substitute for face-to-face discussions.

    They also agreed to send their ambassadors back to each other's capitals. Russia recalled its envoy after Biden said in March that he thought Putin was a "killer." The United States recalled its ambassador soon after.

    Putin said on Wednesday that he had been satisfied by Biden’s explanation of the remark.

    But there was no hiding their differences on issues such as human rights, where Biden said the consequences for Russia would be "devastating" if jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny died, or cyberspace, where Washington has demanded Moscow crack down on ransomware attacks emanating from Russian soil.

    "I looked at him and said: 'How would you feel if ransomware took on the pipelines from your oil fields?' He said: 'It would matter,'" Biden told reporters at an unusual solo news conference, itself an illustration of the tensions between the two nations.

    The query referred to a cyberattack that closed the Colonial Pipeline Co (COLPI.UL) system for several days in May, preventing millions of barrels of gasoline, diesel and jet fuel from flowing to the East Coast from the Gulf Coast.

    Biden also vowed to take action against any Russian cyberattacks: "I pointed out to him that we have significant cyber capability. And he knows it."

    'THIS IS NOT ABOUT TRUST'

    Speaking to reporters before Biden, Putin dismissed U.S. concerns about Navalny, Russia's increased military presence near Ukraine's eastern border and U.S. suggestions that Russians were responsible for the cyberattacks on the United States.

    He also suggested Washington was in no position to lecture Moscow on rights, batting away question about his crackdown on political rivals by saying he was trying to avoid the "disorder" of a popular movement, such as Black Lives Matter.

    "What we saw was disorder, disruption, violations of the law, etc. We feel sympathy for the United States of America, but we don’t want that to happen on our territory and we'll do our utmost in order to not allow it to happen,” he said.

    He also seemed to question the legitimacy of arresting the rioters who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, seeking to stop Biden’s certification as president after he beat his predecessor, Donald Trump, in the November election by over 7 million votes.

    1/12

    U.S. President Joe Biden and Russia's President Vladimir Putin shake hands as they arrive for the U.S.-Russia summit at Villa La Grange in Geneva, Switzerland, June 16, 2021. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

    Biden said any comparison between what happened on Jan. 6 and the Black Lives Matter movement was “ridiculous.”

    U.S.-Russia relations have been deteriorating for years, notably with Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea from Ukraine, its 2015 intervention in Syria and U.S. charges - denied by Moscow - of meddling in the 2016 election won by Trump.

    Neither side gave details on how their planned cybersecurity talks might unfold, although Biden said he told Putin that critical infrastructure should be “off-limits” to cyberattacks, saying that included 16 sectors that he did not publicly identify.

    "We need some basic rules of the road that we can all abide by," Biden said he had told Putin.

    Biden said he raised human rights issues because it was in the "DNA" of his country to do so, and also because of the fate of U.S. citizens jailed in Russia.

    Putin said he believed some compromises could be found, although he gave no indication of any prisoner exchange deal.

    Putin, 68, called Biden, 78, a constructive, experienced partner, and said they spoke "the same language." But he added that there had been no friendship, rather a pragmatic dialogue about their two countries' interests.

    "President Biden has miscalculated who he is dealing with," said U.S. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who is close to Trump. He called it "disturbing" to hear Biden suggest that Putin cared about his standing in the world.

    Trump was accused by both Democrats and some Republicans of not being tough enough on Putin, particularly during a jovial 2018 meeting in Helsinki between the two leaders.

    This time, there were separate news conferences and no shared meal.

    Both Biden and Putin said they shared a responsibility, however, for nuclear stability, and would hold talks on possible changes to their recently extended New START arms limitation treaty.

    In February, Russia and the United States extended New START for five years. The treaty caps the number of strategic nuclear warheads they can deploy and limits the land- and submarine-based missiles and bombers to deliver them.

    A senior U.S. official told reporters that Biden, Putin, their foreign ministers and interpreters met first for 93 minutes. After a break, the two sides met for 87 minutes in a larger group including their ambassadors.

    Putin said it was "hard to say" if relations would improve, but that there was a "glimpse of hope."

    “This is not about trust, this is about self-interest and verification of self-interest,” Biden said, but he also cited a “genuine prospect” of improving relations.

    Reporting By Steve Holland and Vladimir Soldatkin; Additional reporting by Humeyra Pamuk and Stephanie Nebehay in Geneva, Tom Balmforth and Andrew Osborn in Moscow; Writing by Arshad Mohammed in Saint Paul, Minn.; Editing by Mary Milliken and Sonya Hepinstall

    Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

     

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-putin-summit-russia-naval-exercise/

     

    Ahead of Biden-Putin summit, Russia conducts what it calls its largest naval exercise in the Pacific since Cold War

    The exercise includes surface ships, anti-submarine aircraft and long range bombers. 

    U.S. defense officials said that on Sunday, the U.S. scrambled F-22s from Hawaii in response to the bomber flights, but the bombers did not enter the Air Defense Identification Zone and were not intercepted.  

    At the same time, officials said a U.S. carrier strike group headed by the USS Vinson is operating about 200 miles east of Hawaii, conducting a strike group certification exercise. The exercise had been planned but was moved closer to Hawaii in response to the Russian exercise.

    "U.S. Indo-Pacific Command is monitoring the Russian vessels operating in international waters in the Western Pacific," U.S. Indo-Pacific Command spokesman Captain Mike Kafka told CBS News in a statement.  

    "We operate in accordance with international law of the sea and in the air to ensure that all nations can do the same without fear or contest and in order to secure a free and open Indo-Pacific. As Russia operates within the region, it is expected to do so in accordance with international law."

    Earlier this year, Russia built up tens of thousands of troops on the border with Ukraine as a part of what it called an exercise before reducing troops in late April after a month of buildup. The Pentagon called on Russia to be more transparent about troop movements during the buildup. 

    After meeting with NATO leaders on Monday, Mr. Biden indicated in a press conference that he will address the transparency of Russia's behavior in his meeting with Mr. Putin.  

    "I shared with our allies that I will convey  to President Putin: That I'm not looking for conflict with Russia, but that we will respond if Russia continues its harmful activities and that we will not fail to defend the Transatlantic Alliance or stand up for democratic values," Mr. Biden said. 
     

     

     

     https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20210421-putin-warns-of-quick-and-tough-response-to-any-provocation-by-the-west

     

    Putin warns of 'quick and tough' response to any provocation by the West

     


    Issued on:
    Russian President Vladimir Putin giving his annual state of the nation address in Moscow, Russia, on April 21, 2021.
    Russian President Vladimir Putin giving his annual state of the nation address in Moscow, Russia, on April 21, 2021.© Alexander Zemlianichenko, AP

    President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday sternly warned the West against encroaching further on Russia’s security interests, saying Moscow’s response will be “quick and tough” and make the culprits feel bitterly sorry for their action.

    The warning during Putin’s annual state-of-the-nation address came amid a massive Russian military buildup near Ukraine, where cease-fire violations in the seven-year conflict between Russia-backed separatists and Ukrainian forces have escalated in recent weeks. The United States and its allies have urged the Kremlin to pull the troops back.

    “I hope that no one dares to cross the red line in respect to Russia, and we will determine where it is in each specific case,” Putin said. “Those who organize any provocations threatening our core security interests will regret their deeds more than they regretted anything for a long time.”

    Moscow has rejected Ukrainian and Western concerns about the troop buildup, saying it doesn’t threaten anyone and that Russia is free to deploy its forces on its territory. But the Kremlin also has warned Ukraine against trying to use force to retake control of the rebel-held east, saying Russia could be forced to intervene to protect civilians in the region.

    “We really don’t want to burn the bridges,” Putin said. “But if some mistake our good intentions for indifference or weakness and intend to burn or even blow up those bridges themselves, Russia’s response will be asymmetrical, quick and tough."

     


     

    00:31

    Outrage over Navanly's treatment

    As Putin spoke, a wave of protests started rolling across Russia’s far east in support of imprisoned opposition leader Alexei Navalny. The politician, who is Putin’s most persistent critic and was poisoned with a chemical nerve agent last year, started a hunger strike three weeks ago to protest what he said was inadequate medical treatment and officials’ refusal to allow his doctor to visit him.

    Navalny’s treatment and deteriorating condition has caused international outrage and prompted his allies to call the nationwide protests. Police detained several Navalny associates in Moscow and moved to disperse unauthorized demonstrations across Russia, arresting scores.

    In his speech, Putin pointed to Russia’s moves to modernize its nuclear arsenal and said the military would continue to build more state-of-the-art hypersonic missiles and other new weapons. He added that the development of the nuclear-armed Poseidon underwater drone and the Burevestnik nuclear-powered cruise missile is continuing successfully.

    In an apparent reference to the U.S. and its allies, the Russian leader denounced those who impose “unlawful, politically motivated economic sanctions and crude attempts to enforce its will on others.” He said Russia has shown restraint and often refrained from responding to “openly boorish” actions by others.

    The Biden administration last week imposed new sanctions on Russia for interfering in the 2020 U.S. presidential election and for involvement in the SolarWind hack of federal agencies — activities Moscow has denied. The U.S. ordered 10 Russian diplomats expelled, targeted dozens of companies and individuals, and imposed new curbs on Russia’s ability to borrow money.

    Russia retaliated by ordering 10 U.S. diplomats to leave, blacklisting eight current and former U.S. officials, and tightening requirements for U.S. Embassy operations.

    “Russia has its own interests, which we will defend in line with the international law,” Putin said during Wednesday’s address. “If somebody refuses to understand this obvious thing, is reluctant to conduct a dialogue and chooses a selfish and arrogant tone, Russia will always find a way to defend its position.”

    'Bullying Russia' is a 'new sport'

    In an emotional outburst, Putin chastised the West for acquiring a defiant stance toward Russia.

    “Some countries have developed a nasty habit of bullying Russia for any reason or without any reason at all. It has become a new sport,” he said.

    In an apparent reference to the U.S. allies, he compared them to Tabaqui, a cowardly golden jackal kowtowing to Shere Khan, the tiger in Rudyard Kipling’s “Jungle Book.” “They howl to please their lord,” he said.

    Russia this week engaged in a tense tug-of-war with the Czech Republic, following Prague’s move to expel 18 Russian diplomats over a massive Czech ammunition depot explosion in 2014. Moscow has dismissed the Czech accusations of its involvement in the blast as absurd and retaliated by expelling 20 Czech diplomats.

    Putin also harshly criticized the West for failing to condemn what he described as a botched coup attempt and a failed plot to assassinate Belarus’ President Alexander Lukashenko, allegedly involving a blockade of the country’s capital, power cuts and cyberattacks. Belarusian and Russian security agencies arrested the alleged coup plotters in Moscow earlier this month.

    The practice of organizing coups and planning political assassinations of top officials goes over the top and crosses all boundaries,” Putin said, drawing parallels to plots against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and the popular protests that led to the ouster of Ukraine’s former Russia-friendly president, Viktor Yanukovych, in 2014.

    Russia responded to Yanukovych’s ouster by annexing Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula and throwing its support to the separatists in the country’s east. Since then, fighting there has killed more than 14,000 people and devastated the industrial heartland.

    Putin dedicated most of his annual address to domestic issues, hailing the nation’s response to the coronavirus pandemic. He said the quick development of three coronavirus vaccines underlined Russia’s technological and industrial potential. He called for a quicker pace of immunizations, voicing hope the country could achieve collective immunity this fall.

    He put forward incentives to help the economy recover from the pandemic and promised new social payments focusing on families with children.

    (AP)

     


    Russia Bolsters Its Submarine Fleet, and Tensions With U.S. Rise

    Nuclear-powered submarines at a base in Russia’s Murmansk region. Moscow has increased submarine patrols in the past year.
    Credit...Lev Fedoseyev/TASS, via Getty Images

    NAPLES, Italy — Russian attack submarines, the most in two decades, are prowling the coastlines of Scandinavia and Scotland, the Mediterranean Sea and the North Atlantic in what Western military officials say is a significantly increased presence aimed at contesting American and NATO undersea dominance.

    Adm. Mark Ferguson, the United States Navy’s top commander in Europe, said last fall that the intensity of Russian submarine patrols had risen by almost 50 percent over the past year, citing public remarks by the Russian Navy chief, Adm. Viktor Chirkov. Analysts say that tempo has not changed since then.

    The patrols are the most visible sign of a renewed interest in submarine warfare by President Vladimir V. Putin, whose government has spent billions of dollars for new classes of diesel and nuclear-powered attack submarines that are quieter, better armed and operated by more proficient crews than in the past.

    The tensions are part of an expanding rivalry and military buildup, with echoes of the Cold War, between the United States and Russia. Moscow is projecting force not only in the North Atlantic but also in Syria and Ukraine and building up its nuclear arsenal and cyberwarfare capacities in what American military officials say is an attempt to prove its relevance after years of economic decline and retrenchment.

    Independent American military analysts see the increased Russian submarine patrols as a legitimate challenge to the United States and NATO. Even short of tensions, there is the possibility of accidents and miscalculations. But whatever the threat, the Pentagon is also using the stepped-up Russian patrols as another argument for bigger budgets for submarines and anti-submarine warfare.


    American naval officials say that in the short term, the growing number of Russian submarines, with their ability to shadow Western vessels and European coastlines, will require more ships, planes and subs to monitor them. In the long term, the Defense Department has proposed $8.1 billion over the next five years for “undersea capabilities,” including nine new Virginia-class attack submarines that can carry up to 40 Tomahawk cruise missiles, more than triple the capacity now.

    “We’re back to the great powers competition,” Adm. John M. Richardson, the chief of naval operations, said in an interview.

    Last week, unarmed Russian warplanes repeatedly buzzed a Navy destroyer in the Baltic Sea and at one point came within 30 feet of the warship, American officials said. Last year some of Russia’s new diesel submarines launched four cruise missiles at targets in Syria.

    Mr. Putin’s military modernization program also includes new intercontinental ballistic missiles as well as aircraft, tanks and air defense systems.

    To be sure, there is hardly parity between the Russian and American submarine fleets. Russia has about 45 attack submarines — about two dozen are nuclear-powered and 20 are diesel — which are designed to sink other submarines or ships, collect intelligence and conduct patrols. But Western naval analysts say that only about half of those are able to deploy at any given time. Most stay closer to home and maintain an operational tempo far below a Cold War peak.

    Rostov-on-Don, a diesel-electric attack submarine, being launched in St. Petersburg, Russia, in 2014.Credit...Anatoly Maltsev/European Pressphoto Agency

    The United States has 53 attack submarines, all nuclear-powered, as well as four other nuclear-powered submarines that carry cruise missiles and Special Operations forces. At any given time, roughly a third of America’s attack submarines are at sea, either on patrols or training, with the others undergoing maintenance. American Navy officials and Western analysts say that American attack submarines, which are made for speed, endurance and stealth to deploy far from American shores, remain superior to their Russian counterparts.

    The Pentagon is also developing sophisticated technology to monitor encrypted communications from Russian submarines and new kinds of remotely controlled or autonomous vessels. Members of the NATO alliance, including Britain, Germany and Norway, are at the same time buying or considering buying new submarines in response to the Kremlin’s projection of force in the Baltic and Arctic.

    But Moscow’s recently revised national security and maritime strategies emphasize the need for Russian maritime forces to project power and to have access to the broader Atlantic Ocean as well as the Arctic.

    Russian submarines and spy ships now operate near the vital undersea cables that carry almost all global Internet communications, raising concerns among some American military and intelligence officials that the Russians could attack those lines in times of tension or conflict. Russia is also building an undersea unmanned drone capable of carrying a small, tactical nuclear weapon to use against harbors or coastal areas, American military and intelligence analysts said.

    And, like the United States, Russia operates larger nuclear-powered submarines that carry long-range nuclear missiles and spend months at a time hiding in the depths of the ocean. Those submarines, although lethal, do not patrol like the attack submarines do, and do not pose the same degree of concern to American Naval officials.

    Two nuclear-powered cruise-missile submarines, Smolensk, left, and Voronezh, at a base in northern Russia in March.Credit...Lev Fedoseyev/TASS, via Getty Images

    Analysts say that Moscow’s continued investment in attack submarines is in contrast to the quality of many of Russia’s land and air forces that frayed in the post-Cold War era.

    “In the Russian naval structure, submarines are the crown jewels for naval combat power,” said Magnus Nordenman, director of the Atlantic Council’s trans-Atlantic security initiative in Washington. “The U.S. and NATO haven’t focused on anti-submarine operations lately, and they’ve let that skill deteriorate.”

    That has allowed for a rapid Russian resurgence, Western and American officials say, partly in response to what they say is Russia’s fear of being hemmed in.

    “I don’t think many people understand the visceral way Russia views NATO and the European Union as an existential threat,” Admiral Ferguson said in an interview.

    In Naples, at the headquarters of the United States Navy’s European operations, including the Sixth Fleet, commanders for the first time in decades are having to closely monitor Russian submarine movements through the maritime choke points separating Greenland, Iceland and the United Kingdom, the G.I.U.K. Gap, which during the Cold War were crucial to the defense of Europe.

    The United States attack submarine Virginia, lead boat of its class, moved up the Clyde en route to the naval base at Faslane, Scotland, last month.       Credit...Andrew Testa for The New York Times

    That stretch of ocean, hundreds of miles wide, represented the line that Soviet naval forces would have had to cross to reach the Atlantic and to stop United States forces heading across the sea to reinforce America’s European allies in time of conflict.

    American anti-submarine aircraft were stationed for decades at the Naval Air Station Keflavik in Iceland — in the middle of the gap — but they withdrew in 2006, years after the Cold War. The Navy after that relied on P-3 sub-hunter planes rotating periodically through the base.

    Now, the Navy is poised to spend about $20 million to upgrade hangars and support sites at Keflavik to handle its new, more advanced P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft. That money is part of the Pentagon’s new $3.4 billion European Reassurance Initiative, a quadrupling of funds from last year to deploy heavy weapons, armored vehicles and other equipment to NATO countries in Central and Eastern Europe, to deter Russian aggression.

    Navy officials express concern that more Russian submarine patrols will push out beyond the Atlantic into the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Russia has one Mediterranean port now, in Tartus, Syria, but Navy officials here say Moscow wants to establish others, perhaps in Cyprus, Egypt or even Libya.

    “If you have a Russian nuclear attack submarine wandering around the Med, you want to track it,” said Dmitry Gorenburg, a Russian military specialist at the Center for Naval Analyses in Washington.

    This month, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency christened a 132-foot prototype drone sea craft packed with sensors, the Sea Hunter, which is made with the intention of hunting autonomously for submarines and mines for up to three months at a time.

    The allies are also holding half a dozen anti-submarine exercises this year, including a large drill scheduled later this spring called Dynamic Mongoose in the North Sea. The exercise is to include warships and submarines from Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland and the United States.

    “We are not quite back in a Cold War,” said James G. Stavridis, a retired admiral and the former supreme allied commander of NATO, who is now dean of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University. “But I sure can see one from where we are standing.”


    Correction: 

    A map on April 21 with the continuation of an article about what Western military officials say is a significantly increased presence of Russian submarines along the coastlines of Scandinavia and Scotland, the Mediterranean Sea and the North Atlantic, meant to contest American and NATO undersea dominance, omitted two countries in NATO. Croatia and Luxembourg are also members.

    Follow The New York Times’s politics and Washington coverage on Facebook and Twitter, and sign up for the First Draft politics newsletter.

    A version of this article appears in print on April 21, 2016, Section A, Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline: Russia Expands Submarine Fleet as Rivalry Grows . Order Reprints | Today’s Paper | Subscribe

     

     

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56746138 

     

    Russia to consider Biden plan for Putin summit

     
    Published
     
    A camouflage net covers military hardware during an exercise held by units of the Novorossiysk guards mountain air assault division of the Russian Airborne Troops at Opuk rangeImage source, Getty Images Image caption, Russia's military has been conducting exercises in Crimea as well as near the border with eastern Ukraine

    Hours after US President Joe Biden proposed a summit with Russia's Vladimir Putin, the Kremlin has said it will study the idea.

    "It is early to talk about this meeting in terms of specifics," said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.

    Mr Biden made the proposal on the phone with Mr Putin, raising concerns about Russia's troop build-up on Ukraine's borders, the White House said.

    The phone-call late on Tuesday was only the second conversation that President Biden has had with Russia's leader since he took office in January. Moscow recalled its ambassador for consultations last month after Mr Biden said he considered President Putin to be a "killer".

    Mr Biden's predecessor, Donald Trump, met Mr Putin in Finland in 2018 and Finnish President Sauli Niinisto has reportedly offered to host a new summit.

    Mr Niinisto's office said in a statement that he had a long call with the Russian leader on Tuesday evening and expressed concern about the troop build-up.

    Mr Peskov said on Wednesday that "without doubt bilateral ties are important".

    How significant is the troop build-up?

    The US and European leaders have watched Russian military movements with increasing alarm. Ukraine's presidential spokeswoman, Yulia Mendel, said this week that Russia now had some 40,000 troops on the border with eastern Ukraine and a further 42,000 in Crimea, which was seized and then annexed by Russia in 2014. 

    Map of eastern Ukraine

    1px transparent line

    Russian-backed separatists then took control of parts of eastern Ukraine in a conflict in which some 14,000 people have died, and clashes have flared up in recent weeks.

    Until now Moscow has spoken of its troop movements as an internal affair, and Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu said on Tuesday they were part of a three-week drill to test combat readiness. He accused Nato of moving troops near Russia's borders, which the Western military alliance has denied.

    How has Nato responded?

    Nato Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg called for an end to the "unjustified, unexplained and deeply concerning" military build-up, after talks in Brussels on Tuesday with US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken as well as Ukraine's foreign minister. Ukraine is not part of Nato but its president, Volodymyr Zelensky, is keen to join.

    UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab has called on Russia to end "provocations" and de-escalate tensions.

    Ukraine's military said it was conducting exercises near the Crimean peninsula in case of a Russian attack and the US is sending two warships to the Black Sea, which has prompted Russia's navy to move some of its fleet there from the Caspian Sea.

    In a separate development, the Kremlin said Mr Putin's foreign policy adviser, Yuri Ushakov, had warned the US ambassador over any "unfriendly steps" Washington might take, such as imposing further sanctions.

     

     
     

    President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. spoke today with President Vladimir Putin of Russia. They discussed a number of regional and global issues, including the intent of the United States and Russia to pursue a strategic stability dialogue on a range of arms control and emerging security issues, building on the extension of the New START Treaty. President Biden also made clear that the United States will act firmly in defense of its national interests in response to Russia’s actions, such as cyber intrusions and election interference. President Biden emphasized the United States’ unwavering commitment to Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The President voiced our concerns over the sudden Russian military build-up in occupied Crimea and on Ukraine’s borders, and called on Russia to de-escalate tensions. President Biden reaffirmed his goal of building a stable and predictable relationship with Russia consistent with U.S. interests, and proposed a summit meeting in a third country in the coming months to discuss the full range of issues facing the United States and Russia.


    https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/04/02/russia-ukraine-military-biden/

     

    Russia’s Buildup Near Ukraine Puts Team Biden on Edge

    Is Russia testing the waters or just testing Biden?

     

     

    https://foreignpolicy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/GettyImages-1231288169.jpg?resize=1000,667&quality=90   An Ukrainian soldier stands in position on the front line with Russia-backed separatists in Donetsk region on Feb. 19. Anatolii Stepanov/AFP via Getty Images

    Russia is massing an unusual number of troops on the border with Ukraine, posing an early test for the Biden administration as it looks to repair relations with NATO allies and distinguish itself from former U.S. President Donald Trump’s controversial approach to relations with Moscow.

    The buildup of forces on the Ukrainian border, along with hundreds of cease-fire violations in Ukraine’s eastern territories controlled by Russia-backed separatists, has alarmed NATO and sparked a flurry of phone calls between senior members of the Biden administration and their Ukrainian and Russian counterparts.

    “They’re probing, they’re trying to see what we’re going to do, what NATO would do, what the Ukrainians would do,” said Jim Townsend, a former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense for Europe and NATO until 2017. “Is this a jumpy administration, or is this an administration that’s going to act with resolve? They’re doing all of these things to assess where the new administration is.”

    President Joe Biden spoke to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Friday, according to a Ukrainian readout, the first conversation between the two countries’ leaders since Trump’s ill-fated call in July 2019 with Zelensky that sparked his first impeachment investigation. “We stand shoulder to shoulder when it comes to preservation of our democracies,” the Ukrainian leader tweeted after the 50-minute conversation.

    Envoys from the 30-member NATO alliance met on Thursday to discuss the matter and expressed concern about Russia’s large-scale military exercises and the uptick in cease-fire violations, a NATO official told Foreign Policy. “Russia’s destabilizing actions undermine efforts to de-escalate tensions,” the official said. “NATO continues to support Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. We remain vigilant and continue to monitor the situation closely.”

    On Friday, the Kremlin warned that any deployment of NATO troops to Ukraine would escalate tensions further and prompt Russia to take additional measures to protect itself.

    The conflict in eastern Ukraine between the country’s armed forces and Russia-backed separatists has periodically flared since a 2015 peace deal brought the worst of the fighting to an end. Observers of the conflict say the current escalation is of a different magnitude than previous scares.

    Videos shared by Russian social media users, which are difficult to independently verify, appear to show trains and convoys of military vehicles streaming to the border with Ukraine and Crimea, the strategic Ukrainian peninsula on the Black Sea that Russia illegally annexed in 2014. Observers and experts are still trying to sort out Russian intentions behind the buildup, which appeared to outpace Moscow’s normal tempo for military exercises.

    “[Russian President Vladimir Putin is] not so obvious when he pulls the big move. Why is he letting us see this?” said Townsend, the former Pentagon official.

    Former U.S. officials saw this as a clear effort by Moscow to test the new Biden administration, which is still parsing policy reviews on how to craft a new strategy toward Russia after other escalations, including a massive hack on U.S. government agencies that Washington has blamed on the Kremlin.

    “This could be a troop maneuver where they’re just testing to see how we react, it could be something military, or it could be where he parks people on the border,” a former senior Trump administration official told Foreign Policy. “They need to lay out publicly what the policy is. Further Russian incursions are not acceptable.”

    The Crimea annexation in 2014 also started with a major snap military exercise along Russia’s western border with Ukraine, before masked men later poured into the Black Sea territory and overtook it.

    Longtime observers of the conflict are skeptical that Russia is planning a renewed invasion of Ukraine, but they did not rule out the possibility entirely. “The thing about Vladimir Putin is that when we are thinking about what he is going to do, we are trying to think that it’s going to be something rational,” said Kirill Mikhailov, a researcher with the Conflict Intelligence Team, which tracks Russian military involvement in Ukraine. “He may have an entirely different view of the world, given that the information that he is getting is presumed to be highly curated.”

    The Russian military analyst Pavel Felgenhauer characterized this alternate worldview in comments to the BBC last month: “In the understanding of the Russian military, the West is waging hybrid war against Russia on many fronts: in Belarus, in Ukraine, with respect to Alexey Navalny,” he said.

    Robert Lee, an expert on the Russian military and a Ph.D. candidate at King’s College London, said the moves were most likely intended to deter Ukraine from any future offensives in the region. “Russia is showing that they retain escalation dominance,” he said.

    Zelensky has made a number of moves against Russian proxies in Ukraine, which some observers said may have factored into Moscow’s calculus. In February, the Ukrainian oligarch Viktor Medvedchuk, a close Putin ally, was sanctioned by Kyiv, and three TV channels controlled by the magnate were shut down.

    “It’s not about Medvedchuk as an individual,” said Michael Carpenter, who served as U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia during the Obama administration. “One of the main reasons why the Kremlin keeps these protracted conflicts percolating over time is precisely so that when its other levers of influence, whether they be oligarchs or corrupt politicians among neighboring countries, when they don’t deliver, they always have the option of turning up the heat on the conflict in order to gain influence in that way.”

    Former U.S. officials also pointed to Putin’s desire to pressure Germany on multiple fronts, including the controversial construction of the undersea Nord Stream 2 natural gas pipeline that would bypass Ukraine and the Berlin-led Trilateral Contact Group that is tasked with ongoing cease-fire negotiations in eastern Ukraine.

    But through Friday, the Ukrainian military continued going through its regular high-readiness training cycles, according to a source familiar with the preparations. Most assessments from the ground indicate that the Russians are conducting strategic posturing, but do not discount a sudden land grab, the source said. Ukraine could also move forward heavy equipment positioned in the west that is aimed at halting a Russian advance, including U.S.-made Javelin anti-tank missiles, which can rapidly be moved to the front lines under rules approved last year.

    “The problem with the Russians is everything for them is a red line, and they bluster on everything, and when their position starts to collapse, they’ll backpedal,” a former senior U.S. defense official said. “The Ukrainians understand that better than anyone.”

    The buildup comes amid a host of other escalatory activities by Moscow. “They have really brought out a continental-wide saber-rattling event,” said Ben Hodges, who was commanding general of U.S. Army Europe until 2017. Last Friday, the Russian defense ministry published a video of three Russian submarines punching up through ice in the Arctic, a difficult maneuver that Hodges said was a demonstration of capability in a region that has been subject to increasing military competition.

    On Monday, NATO reported an “unusual peak” in Russian flights near the fringes of the alliance, with 10 flights being intercepted by NATO planes within a six-hour window. These events, combined with the buildup along the border with Ukraine, are “obviously not a coincidence,” Hodges said.

    The tensions come as West-Russia relations have “hit the bottom,” according to Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov. Moscow recalled its ambassador to Washington, Anatoly Antonov, after Biden agreed to a comment that Putin was a “killer” in a recent interview.

    But the Biden administration intends to keep its diplomatic channel open to Moscow despite the spike in bilateral tensions. A State Department spokesperson told Foreign Policy that there are “no plans” to recall the U.S. ambassador to Moscow, John Sullivan, to Washington in response to Russia’s decision.

    “We remain committed to open channels of communication with the Russian government, both to advance U.S. interests and reduce the risk of miscalculation between our countries,” the spokesperson said.

    Even as tensions have increased in the last few days, former U.S. officials said Kyiv remains wary of escalating any conflict, potentially taking the bait from Moscow and allowing Russia-backed forces to further consolidate their gains in the east. Instead, Zelensky is likely to lean on the West, the person said.

    “The Ukrainians are better off with a stalemate than escalating and getting their clock cleaned,” the former senior U.S. defense official said. “[Their] best play in the Donbass is international pressure and to wait Putin out. Plinking a few tanks with Javelins isn’t going to do much,” the official said, referring to Ukraine’s U.S.-supplied anti-tank Javelin missiles.

    Amy Mackinnon is a national security and intelligence reporter at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @ak_mack

    Jack Detsch is Foreign Policy’s Pentagon and national security reporter. Twitter: @JackDetsch

    Robbie Gramer is a diplomacy and national security reporter at Foreign Policy. Twitter: @RobbieGramer

     

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/hmcs-calgary-china-sea-transit-1.5972098

     

    Canadian warship transits South China Sea as diplomatic tensions remain high

    HMCS Calgary passed near the disputed Spratly Islands, claimed by both China and the Philippines

    The Department of National Defence says HMCS Calgary passed through the South China Sea while travelling from Brunei to Vietnam on Monday and Tuesday. 

    The passage did not go unnoticed by China, which shadowed the Canadian ship, according to a Defence official speaking on condition of anonymity.

    China claims much of the sea as its territory and has been greatly expanding its military presence in the area. Many of those claims have been rejected by China's neighbours and several international rulings. 

    The Calgary's passage could aggravate tensions with Beijing, which has been engaged in a diplomatic dispute with Ottawa since Huawei executive Meng Wanzhou was arrested at the Vancouver airport in December 2018. 

    Beijing subsequently arrested two Canadians, Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, in what the federal government and others have described as an act of retaliation in response to Meng's detention. 

    Meng is now facing possible extradition to the U.S. to face fraud allegations, while China has launched court proceedings against Kovrig and Spavor behind closed doors in recent weeks.

    Department of National Defence spokesperson Daniel Le Bouthillier confirmed the Calgary passed near the disputed Spratly Islands — which both China and the Philippines claim and where the Chinese military has set up facilities and equipment.

    Demonstrating support for allies

    He said the South China Sea was the most practical route for the warship. Canadian officials have previously denied trying to send any message when warships have passed through waters claimed by China. 

    But documents obtained by The Canadian Press last year show such passages are often discussed at the highest levels of government before being approved. 

    One transit by HMCS Ottawa through the South China Sea's Taiwan Strait last year was described in the documents as having "demonstrated Canadian support for our closest partners and allies, regional security and the rules-based international order."

    Defence officials were told to keep quiet about the Ottawa's trip in September 2019, three months after Chinese fighter jets buzzed two other Canadian ships making the same voyage.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

     

     https://www.heritage.org/military-strength/assessing-threats-us-vital-interests/russia


    Assessing Threats to U.S. Vital Interests

    Russia

    Oct 20, 2021 

     

    Russia

     The Heritage Foundation

    Alexis Mrachek

    Russia remains a formidable ‌threat to the United States and its interests in Europe. From the Arctic to the Baltics, Ukraine, and the South Caucasus, and increasingly in the Mediterranean, Russia continues to foment instability in Europe. Despite economic problems, Russia continues to prioritize the rebuilding of its military and funding for its military operations abroad. Russia remains antagonistic to the United States both militarily and politically, and its efforts to undermine U.S. institutions and the NATO alliance continue without letup. In Europe, Russia uses its energy position, along with espionage, cyberattacks, and information warfare, to exploit vulnerabilities with the goal of dividing the transatlantic alliance and undermining faith in government and societal institutions.

    Overall, Russia possesses significant conventional and nuclear capabilities and remains the principal threat to European security. Its aggressive stance in a number of theaters, including the Balkans, Georgia, Syria, and Ukraine, continues both to encourage destabilization and to threaten U.S. interests.

    Military Capabilities. According to the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS):

    • Among the key weapons in Russia’s inventory are 336 intercontinental ballistic missiles, 2,840 main battle tanks, 5,220 armored infantry fighting vehicles, more than 6,100 armored personnel carriers, and more than 4,684 pieces of artillery.
    • The navy has one aircraft carrier; 49 submarines (including 11 ballistic missile submarines); four cruisers; 11 destroyers; 15 frigates; and 125 patrol and coastal combatants.
    • The air force has 1,160 combat-capable aircraft.
    • The army has 280,000 soldiers.
    • There is a total reserve force of 2,000,000 for all armed forces.1
      undefinedundefined

    In addition, Russian deep-sea research vessels include converted ballistic missile submarines, which hold smaller auxiliary submarines that can operate on the ocean floor.2

    undefinedundefined

    To avoid political blowback from military deaths abroad, Russia has increasingly deployed paid private volunteer troops trained at Special Forces bases and often under the command of Russian Special Forces. It has used such volunteers in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine because they help the Kremlin “keep costs low and maintain a degree of deniability,” and “[a]ny personnel losses could be shrouded from unauthorized disclosure.”3

    undefinedundefined

    In February 2018, for example, at Deir al-Zour in eastern Syria, 500 pro-Assad forces and Russian mercenaries armed with Russian tanks, artillery, and mortars attacked U.S.-supported Kurdish forces.4

    undefinedundefined
    Approximately 30 U.S. Rangers and Delta Force special operators were also at the base.5
    undefinedundefined
    U.S. air strikes helped to repulse the attack, and “three sources familiar with the matter” estimated that approximately 300 Russian mercenaries were either killed or wounded.6
    undefinedundefined
    Moscow claims, however, that since the launch of its Syria operation, only 112 Russian troops have suffered casualties.7
    undefinedundefined

    In January 2019, reports surfaced that 400 Russian mercenaries from the Wagner Group were in Venezuela to bolster the regime of Nicolás Maduro.8

    undefinedundefined
    Russian propaganda in Venezuela has supported the regime and stoked fears of American imperialism. In February 2020, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov visited Venezuela to “counteract U.S. sanctions” and show support for Maduro.9
    undefinedundefined

    During the past few years, as the crisis has metastasized and protests against the Maduro regime have grown, Russia has begun to deploy troops and supplies to bolster Maduro’s security forces.10

    undefinedundefined
    In December 2018, for example, Russia temporarily deployed two Tu-160 nuclear-capable bombers to Caracas.11
    undefinedundefined
    Russia also exports billions in arms to Venezuela (and has loaned the regime money to purchase Russian arms) along with $70 million–$80 million yearly in nonmilitary goods.12
    undefinedundefined

    In July 2016, Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a law creating a National Guard with a total strength (both civilian and military) of 340,000, controlled directly by him.13

    undefinedundefined
    He created his National Guard, which is responsible for “enforcing emergency-situation regimes, combating terrorism, defending Russian territory, and protecting state facilities and assets,” by amalgamating “interior troops and various law-enforcement agencies.”14
    undefinedundefined
    Putin is more likely to use this force domestically to stifle dissent than he is to deploy it abroad.15
    undefinedundefined
    However, in November 2020, the Russian National Guard (Rosgvardia) and the Belarusian Ministry of the Interior signed an official cooperation deal specifying that either side “may carry out law-enforcement-type operations on the other’s territory.”16
    undefinedundefined

    This deal likely directly resulted from the Belarusian protests that broke out in August 2020 following the fraudulent presidential election.

    At first, the COVID-19 pandemic severely affected Russia’s economic growth.17

    undefinedundefined
    However, the Russian economy rebounded during the latter part of the pandemic and is expected to record growth in 2021.18
    undefinedundefined

    Because of the economic boost following the coronavirus lockdowns, Russia will likely find it easier to fund its military operations.

    In 2020, Russia spent $61.7 billion on its military—5.23 percent less than it spent in 2019—but still remained one of the world’s top five nations in terms of defense spending.19

    undefinedundefined

    Much of Russia’s military expenditure is directed toward modernization of its armed forces. According to a July 2020 Congressional Research Service report, “Russia has undertaken extensive efforts to modernize and upgrade its armed forces” since its invasion of Georgia in 2008.20

    undefinedundefined
    From 2010 to 2019 (the most recent year for which data are publicly available), close to 40 percent of Russia’s total military spending was on arms procurement.21
    undefinedundefined
    Taking into account total military expenditure, Russia spent more than 4 percent of GDP on defense in 2020.22
    undefinedundefined

    In early 2018, Russia introduced its new State Armament Program 2018–2027, a $306 billion investment in new equipment and force modernization. However, according to the Royal Institute of International Affairs, “as inflation has eroded the value of the rouble since 2011, the new programme is less ambitious than its predecessor in real terms.”23

    undefinedundefined

    Russia has prioritized modernization of its nuclear capabilities and “claims to be 81 percent of the way through a modernization program to replace all Soviet-era missiles with newer types by the early 2020s on a less-than one-for-one basis.”24

    undefinedundefined
    Russia plans to deploy the RS-28 (Satan 2) ICBM by 2022 as a replacement for the RS-36, which is being phased out in the 2020s.25
    undefinedundefined
    The missile, which can carry up to 15 warheads,26
    undefinedundefined
    was to undergo test launches in 2019, but the tests were delayed. To complete the tests, “Russia will first need to upgrade the testing site,” which Russian Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu admitted in December 2020 had yet to be built.27
    undefinedundefined

    The armed forces also continue to undergo process modernization, which was begun by Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov in 2008.28

    undefinedundefined
    Partially because of this modernization, former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development Elbridge Colby stated in January 2018 that the U.S. military advantage over Russia is eroding.29
    undefinedundefined

    In April 2020, the Kremlin stated that it had begun state trials for its T-14 Armata main battle tank in Syria.30

    undefinedundefined
    In March 2021, Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu revealed that the Russian military would receive a pilot batch of the T-14 Armata tanks in 2022.31
    undefinedundefined
    Aside from the T-14 Armata, 10 new-build T-90M main battle tanks, contracted in 2017, were delivered to the 2nd Motor-Rifle Division in the Moscow region in 2020.32
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s fifth-generation Su-27 fighter fell short of expectations, particularly with regard to stealth capabilities. In May 2018, the government cancelled mass production of the Su-27 because of its high costs and limited capability advantages over upgraded fourth-generation fighters.33

    undefinedundefined
    Russia lost one of its Su-27 jets near the Crimean coast during a planned mission in March 2020.34
    undefinedundefined

    In October 2018, Russia’s sole aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, was severely damaged when a dry dock sank and a crane fell, puncturing the deck and hull.35

    undefinedundefined
    In December 2019, the carrier caught on fire during repair work.36
    undefinedundefined
    Despite these setbacks, the Kuznetsov is scheduled to begin sea trials in 2022.37
    undefinedundefined
    In May 2019, reports surfaced that Russia is seeking to begin construction of a new nuclear-powered aircraft carrier in 2023 for delivery in the late 2030s, but the procurement’s financial and technological feasibility remains questionable.38
    undefinedundefined

    Following years of delays, the Admiral Gorshkov stealth guided missile frigate was commissioned in July 2018. The second Admiral Gorshkov–class frigate, the Admiral Kasatonov,began sea trials in April 2019, but according to some analysts, tight budgets and the inability to procure parts from Ukrainian industry (importantly, gas turbine engines) make it difficult for Russia to build the two additional Admiral Gorshkov–class frigates as planned.39

    undefinedundefined
    Nevertheless, on April 23, 2019, keel-laying ceremonies took place for the fifth and sixth Admiral Gorshkov–class frigates, which reportedly will join Russia’s Black Sea fleet.40
    undefinedundefined

    Russia plans to procure eight Lider-class guided missile destroyers for its Northern and Pacific Fleets, but procurement has faced consistent delay.41

    undefinedundefined
    As of April 2020, Russia’s Severnoye Design Bureau halted development of the frigates because of financial setbacks.42
    undefinedundefined

    In November 2018, Russia sold three Admiral Grigorovich–class frigates to India. It is set to deliver at least two of the frigates to India by 2024.43

    undefinedundefined
    The ships had been intended for the Black Sea Fleet, but Russia found itself unable to produce a replacement engine following Ukraine sanctions. Of the planned 14 frigates, Russia had engines for only two,44
    undefinedundefined
    but in January 2021, India procured gas turbine engines from Ukraine to give to Russia to install on the frigates.45
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s naval modernization continues to prioritize submarines. In June 2020, the first Project 955A Borei-A ballistic-missile submarine, the Knyaz Vladimir, was delivered to the Russian Northern Fleet, an addition to the three original Project 955 Boreis.46

    undefinedundefined
    Russia reportedly will construct at least 10 more Borei-A–class submarines.47
    undefinedundefined
    According to Admiral Phil Davidson, head of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, it was expected that “the Russian Pacific Fleet [would] add its first Kalibr cruise missile-capable ships and submarines to its inventory in 2021.”48
    undefinedundefined
    In August 2021, the missile corvette Sovetsk, part of Russia’s Baltic Fleet, test-launched a Kalibr cruise missile from the White Sea.49
    undefinedundefined

    The Khaski-class submarines are planned fifth-generation stealth nuclear-powered submarines. They are slated to begin construction in 2023 and to be armed with Zircon hypersonic missiles, which have a reported speed of from Mach 5 to Mach 6.50

    undefinedundefined
    According to a Russian vice admiral, these submarines will be two times quieter than current subs.51
    undefinedundefined

    Russia also continues to upgrade its diesel electric Kilo-class subs.52

    undefinedundefined
    Reportedly, it inducted the first improved Project 636 Kilo-class submarine into its Pacific Fleet in November 2019 and is now focused on delivering six Project 636 improved Kilo-class subs to the Pacific Fleet.53
    undefinedundefined
    According to one assessment, the submarines’ improvement in noise reduction has caused them to be nicknamed “Black Holes,” but “the submarine class lacks a functioning air-independent propulsion system, which reduced the boats’ overall stealth capabilities.”54
    undefinedundefined

    Transport remains a nagging problem, and Russia’s defense minister has stressed the paucity of transport vessels. According to a RAND report:

    In 1992, just after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Russian Federation military had more than 500 transport aircraft of all types, which were capable of lifting 29,630 metric tons. By 2017, there were just over 100 available transport aircraft in the inventory, capable of lifting 6,240 metric tons, or approximately one-fifth of the 1992 capacity.55
    undefinedundefined

    In 2017, Russia reportedly needed to purchase civilian cargo vessels and use icebreakers to transport troops and equipment to Syria at the beginning of major operations in support of the Assad regime.56

    undefinedundefined

    Although budget shortfalls have hampered modernization efforts overall, Russia continues to focus on development of such high-end systems as the S-500 surface-to-air missile system. As of March 2021, the Russian Ministry of Defense was considering the most fitting ways to introduce its new S-500 Prometheus surface-to-air missile system, which is able to detect targets at up to 1,200 miles, with its missile range maxing at approximately 250 miles, “as part of its wider air-defense modernization.” According to one report, the S-500 system will enter full service by 2025.57

    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s counterspace and countersatellite capabilities are formidable. A Defense Intelligence Agency report released in February 2019 summarized Russian capabilities:

    [O]ver the last two decades, Moscow has been developing a suite of counterspace weapons capabilities, including EW [electronic warfare] to deny, degrade, and disrupt communications and navigation and DEW [directed energy weapons] to deny the use of space-based imagery. Russia is probably also building a ground-based missile capable of destroying satellites in orbit.58
    undefinedundefined

    In December 2020, Russia tested a ballistic, anti-satellite missile built to target imagery and communications satellites in low Earth orbit.59

    undefinedundefined
    According to Colonel Andrei Revenok, Chief of the Space Troops’ Main Center for Missile Attack Warning within Russia’s Aerospace Force, in February 2021, the latest Voronezh radars will replace all of the existing airspace control systems.60
    undefinedundefined

    Military Exercises. Russian military exercises, especially snap exercises, are a source of serious concern because they have masked real military operations in the past. Their purpose is twofold: to project strength and to improve command and control. According to Air Force General Tod D. Wolters, Commander, U.S. European Command (EUCOM):

    Russia employs a below-the-threshold of armed conflict strategy via proxies and intermediary forces in an attempt to weaken, divide, and intimidate our Allies and partners using a range of covert, difficult-to-attribute, and malign actions. These actions include information and cyber operations, election meddling, political subversion, economic intimidation, military sales, exercises, and the calculated use of force.61
    undefinedundefined

    Exercises in the Baltic Sea in April 2018, a day after the leaders of the three Baltic nations met with President Donald Trump in Washington, were meant as a message. Russia stated twice in April that it planned to conduct three days of live-fire exercises in Latvia’s Exclusive Economic Zone, forcing a rerouting of commercial aviation as Latvia closed some of its airspace.62

    undefinedundefined
    Sweden issued warnings to commercial aviation and sea traffic.63
    undefinedundefined
    It turned out that Russia did not actually fire any live missiles, and the Latvian Ministry of Defense described the event as “a show of force, nothing else.”64
    undefinedundefined
    The exercises took place near the Karlskrona Naval Base, the Swedish navy’s largest base.65
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s snap exercises are conducted with little or no warning and often involve thousands of troops and pieces of equipment.66

    undefinedundefined
    In April 2021, for example, between 150,000 and 300,000 Russian troops massed at the Ukrainian border and in Crimea to conduct snap exercises that also involved approximately 35,000 combat vehicles, 900 aircraft, and 190 navy ships.67
    undefinedundefined
    The reintroduction of snap exercises has “significantly improved the Russian Armed Forces’ warfighting and power-projection capabilities,” according to one account. “These, in turn, support and enable Russia’s strategic destabilisation campaign against the West, with military force always casting a shadow of intimidation over Russia’s sub-kinetic aggression.”68
    undefinedundefined

    Snap exercises have been used for military campaigns as well. According to General Curtis M. Scaparrotti, former EUCOM Commander and NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, for example, “the annexation of Crimea took place in connection with a snap exercise by Russia.”69

    undefinedundefined
    Such exercises also provide Russian leadership with a hedge against unpreparedness or corruption. “In addition to affording combat-training benefits,” the IISS reports, “snap inspections appear to be of increasing importance as a measure against corruption or deception.”70
    undefinedundefined

    Russia conducted its VOSTOK (“East”) strategic exercises, held primarily in the Eastern Military District, mainly in August and September of 2018 and purportedly with 300,000 troops, 1,000 aircraft, and 900 tanks taking part.71

    undefinedundefined
    Russia’s defense minister claimed that the exercises were the largest to have taken place in Russia since 1981; however, some analysis suggests that the actual number of participating combat troops was in the range of 75,000–100,000.72
    undefinedundefined

    One analyst described the extent of the exercise:
    [T]he breadth of the exercise was impressive. It uniquely involved several major military districts, as troops from the Central Military District and the Northern Fleet confronted the Eastern Military District and the Pacific Fleet. After establishing communication links and organizing forces, live firing between September 13–17 [sic] included air strikes, air defence operations, ground manoeuvres and raids, sea assault and landings, coastal defence, and electronic warfare.73
    undefinedundefined

    Chinese and Mongolian forces also took part, with China sending 3,200 soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army along with numerous pieces of equipment.74

    undefinedundefined
    Chinese participation was a significant change from past iterations of VOSTOK, although Chinese forces were likely restricted largely to the Tsugol training ground, and an uninvited Chinese intelligence ship shadowed the Russian Navy’s sea exercises.75
    undefinedundefined

    Threats to the Homeland

    Russia is the only state adversary in the Europe region that possesses the capability to threaten the U.S. homeland with both conventional and nonconventional means. Although there is no indication that Russia plans to use its capabilities against the United States absent a broader conflict involving America’s NATO allies, the plausible potential for such a scenario serves to sustain the strategic importance of those capabilities.

    Russia’s 2021 National Security Strategy describes NATO as a threat to the national security of the Russian Federation:

    Military dangers and military threats to the Russian Federation are intensified by attempts to exert military pressure on Russia, its allies and partners, the buildup of the military infrastructure of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization near Russian borders, the intensification of reconnaissance activities, the development of the use of large military formations and nuclear weapons against the Russian Federation.76
    undefinedundefined

    The same document also clearly states that Russia will use every means at its disposal to achieve its strategic goals:

    [P]articular attention is paid to…improving the system of military planning in the Russian Federation, developing and implementing interrelated political, military, military-technical, diplomatic, economic, information and other measures aimed at preventing the use of military force against Russia and protecting its sovereignty and territorial integrity.77
    undefinedundefined

    Strategic Nuclear Threat. Russia possesses the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons (including short-range nuclear weapons) among the nuclear powers. It is one of the few nations with the capability to destroy many targets in the U.S. homeland and in U.S.-allied nations as well as the capability to threaten and prevent free access to the commons by other nations.

    Russia has both intercontinental-range and short-range ballistic missiles and a varied arsenal of nuclear weapons that can be delivered by sea, land, and air. It also is investing significant resources in modernizing its arsenal and maintaining the skills of its workforce, and modernization of the nuclear triad will remain a top priority under the new state armament program.78

    undefinedundefined
    An aging nuclear workforce could impede this modernization. “[A]lthough Russia’s strategic-defence enterprises appear to have preserved some of their expertise,” according to the IISS, “problems remain, for example, in transferring the necessary skill sets and experience to the younger generation of engineers.”79
    undefinedundefined
    Nevertheless, Putin revealed in December 2020 “that modern weapons and equipment now make up 86 percent of Russia’s nuclear triad.”80
    undefinedundefined

    Russia currently relies on its nuclear arsenal to ensure its invincibility against any enemy, intimidate European powers, and deter counters to its predatory behavior in its “near abroad,” primarily in Ukraine but also concerning the Baltic States.81

    undefinedundefined

    This arsenal serves both as a deterrent to large-scale attack and as a protective umbrella under which Russia can modernize its conventional forces at a deliberate pace, but Russia also needs a modern and flexible military to fight local wars such as those against Georgia in 2008 and the ongoing war against Ukraine that began in 2014.

    Under Russian military doctrine, the use of nuclear weapons in conventional local and regional wars is seen as de-escalatory because it would cause an enemy to concede defeat. In May 2017, for example, a Russian parliamentarian threatened that nuclear weapons might be used if the U.S. or NATO were to move to retake Crimea or defend eastern Ukraine.82

    undefinedundefined

    General Wolters discussed the risks presented by Russia’s possible use of tactical nuclear weapons in his 2020 EUCOM posture statement:

    Russia’s vast non-strategic nuclear weapons stockpile and apparent misperception they could gain advantage in crisis or conflict through its use is concerning. Russia continues to engage in disruptive behavior despite widespread international disapproval and continued economic sanctions, and continues to challenge the rules-based international order and violate its obligations under international agreements. The Kremlin employs coercion and aggressive actions amid growing signs of domestic unrest. These actions suggest Russian leadership may feel compelled to take greater risks to maintain power, counter Western influence, and seize opportunities to demonstrate a perception of great power status.83
    undefinedundefined

    Russia has two strategies for nuclear deterrence. The first is based on a threat of massive launch-on-warning and retaliatory strikes to deter a nuclear attack; the second is based on a threat of limited demonstration and “de-escalation” nuclear strikes to deter or terminate a large-scale conventional war.84

    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s reliance on nuclear weapons is based partly on their small cost relative to the cost of conventional weapons, especially in terms of their effect, and on Russia’s inability to attract sufficient numbers of high-quality servicemembers. In other words, Russia sees its nuclear weapons as a way to offset the lower quantity and quality of its conventional forces.

    2022_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength_MAP_10.gif

    Moscow has repeatedly threatened U.S. allies in Europe with nuclear deployments and even preemptive nuclear strikes.85

    undefinedundefined
    The Russians justify their aggressive behavior by pointing to deployments of U.S. missile defense systems in Europe. In the past, these systems were not scaled or postured to mitigate Russia’s advantage in ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons to any significant degree, but Pentagon officials have revealed that laser-armed Strykers, new Eastern European batteries, and sea-based interceptors are set to arrive by 2023.86
    undefinedundefined

    Russia continues to violate the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty, which bans the testing, production, and possession of intermediate-range missiles.87

    undefinedundefined
    Russia first violated the treaty in 2008 and then systematically escalated its violations, moving from testing to producing to deploying the prohibited missile into the field. Russia fully deployed the SSC-X-8 cruise missile in violation of the INF Treaty early in 2017 and has deployed battalions with the missile at a missile test site, Kapustin Yar, in southern Russia; at Kamyshlov, near the border with Kazakhstan; in Shuya, east of Moscow; and in Mozdok, in occupied North Ossetia.88
    undefinedundefined
    U.S. officials consider the banned cruise missiles to be fully operational.89
    undefinedundefined

    In December 2018, in response to Russian violations, the U.S. declared Russia to be in material breach of the INF Treaty, a position with which NATO allies were in agreement.90

    undefinedundefined
    The U.S. provided its six-month notice of withdrawal from the INF treaty on February 2, 2019, and officially withdrew from the treaty on August 2.91
    undefinedundefined

    The sizable Russian nuclear arsenal remains the only threat to the existence of the U.S. homeland emanating from Europe and Eurasia. While the potential for use of this arsenal remains low, the fact that Russia continues to threaten Europe with nuclear attack demonstrates that it will continue to play a central strategic role in shaping both Moscow’s military and political thinking and the level of Russia’s aggressive behavior beyond its borders.

    Threat of Regional War

    Many U.S. allies regard Russia as a genuine threat. At times, this threat is of a military nature. At other times, it involves less conventional tactics such as cyberattacks, utilization of energy resources, and propaganda. Today, as in Imperial times, Russia uses both the pen and the sword to exert its influence. Organizations like the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), for example, embody Russia’s attempt to bind regional capitals to Moscow through a series of agreements and treaties.

    Russia also uses espionage in ways that are damaging to U.S. interests. For example:

    • In May 2016, a Russian spy was sentenced to prison for gathering intelligence for Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) while working as a banker in New York. The spy specifically transmitted intelligence on “potential U.S. sanctions against Russian banks and the United States’ efforts to develop alternative energy resources.”92
      undefinedundefined

    The European External Action Service, diplomatic service of the European Union (EU), estimates that 200 Russian spies are operating in Brussels, which also is the headquarters of NATO.94

    undefinedundefined
    According to one report, Russian spies are becoming harder to track because they infiltrate companies, schools, and even the government.95
    undefinedundefined

    On March 4, 2018, Sergei Skripal, a former Russian GRU colonel who was convicted in 2006 of selling secrets to the United Kingdom and freed in a spy swap between the U.S. and Russia in 2010, and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with Novichok nerve agent by Russian security services in Salisbury, U.K. Hundreds of residents could have been contaminated, including a police officer who was exposed to the nerve agent after responding.96

    undefinedundefined
    It took a year and the work of 190 U.K. Army and Air Force personnel plus contractors to complete the physical cleanup of Salisbury.97
    undefinedundefined

    2022_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength_MAP_11.gif

    undefinedundefined

    On March 15, 2018, France, Germany, the U.K., and the U.S. issued a joint statement condemning Russia’s use of the nerve agent: “This use of a military-grade nerve agent, of a type developed by Russia, constitutes the first offensive use of a nerve agent in Europe since the Second World War.”98

    undefinedundefined
    U.S. intelligence officials have reportedly linked Russia to the deaths of 14 people in the U.K. alone, many of them Russians who ran afoul of the Kremlin.99
    undefinedundefined

    Russian intelligence operatives are reportedly mapping U.S. telecommunications infrastructure around the United States, focusing especially on fiber-optic cables.100

    undefinedundefined

    • In March 2017, the U.S. charged four people, including two Russian intelligence officials, with directing hacks of user data involving Yahoo and Google accounts.101
      undefinedundefined

    Russia has also used its relations with friendly nations—especially Nicaragua—for espionage purposes. In April 2017, Nicaragua began using a Russian-provided satellite station at Managua that, even though the Nicaraguan government denies it is intended for spying, is of concern to the U.S.104

    undefinedundefined
    In November 2017, the Russian-built “counter-drug” center at Las Colinas opened, its future purpose being to support “Russian security engagement with the entire region.”105
    undefinedundefined
    According to a Foreign Policy Research Institute report, “Aside from the center, Russian forces have participated in joint raids and operations against drug trafficking [in Nicaragua], capturing as many as 41 presumed traffickers in one particular operation” since 2017.106
    undefinedundefined
    Russia also has an agreement with Nicaragua, signed in 2015, that allows access to Nicaraguan ports for its naval vessels.107
    undefinedundefined

    Pressure on Central and Eastern Europe. Moscow poses a security challenge to members of NATO that border Russia. Although a conventional Russian attack against a NATO member is unlikely, primarily because it would trigger a NATO response, it cannot be entirely discounted. Russia continues to use cyberattacks, espionage, its significant share of the European energy market, and propaganda to sow discord among NATO member states and undermine the alliance. The Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service’s International Security and Estonia 2019 report states clearly that “[t]he only serious threat to regional security, including the existence and sovereignty of Estonia and other Baltic Sea states, emanates from Russia. It involves not only asymmetrical, covert or political subversion, but also a potential military threat.”108

    undefinedundefined

    After decades of Russian domination, the countries of Central and Eastern Europe factor Russia into their military planning and foreign policy formulation in a way that is simply unimaginable in many Western European countries and North America. Estonia and Latvia have sizable ethnic Russian populations, and there is concern that Russia might exploit this as a pretext for aggression—a view that is not without merit in view of Moscow’s irredentist rhetoric and Russia’s use of this technique to annex Crimea.

    According to Lithuania’s National Threat Assessment 2021, “It is almost certain that Russia’s policy of denying the sovereign choices of its neighbours will remain one of the most significant security threats in the Baltic Region in the future.”109

    undefinedundefined
    Its National Threat Assessment 2019 states that Russia “exploits democratic freedoms and rights for its subversive activity” and “actually promotes its aggressive foreign policy” while “pretending to develop cultural relations” in Lithuania.110
    undefinedundefined

    Latvian authorities describe the means used by Russia to claim that it is defending the rights of citizens or Russian compatriots in similar terms: TV propaganda to push discrediting messages about Latvia and stories in which the rights of Russian citizens are allegedly violated; “spreading interpretations of history favourable to Russia within Russia and abroad, as well as actively engaging in military-memorial work”; and the use of “compatriot support funds and other compatriot policy bodies” targeted at Latvian youth.111

    undefinedundefined

    Russia has also sought to undermine the statehood and legitimacy of the Baltic States. In January 2018, for example, Putin signed a decree renaming an air force regiment the “Tallinn Regiment” to “preserve holy historical military traditions” and “raise [the] spirit of military obligation.”112

    undefinedundefined
    General Scaparrotti testified in March 2017 that Russian propaganda and disinformation should be viewed as an extension of Russia’s military capabilities: “The Russians see this as part of that spectrum of warfare, it’s their asymmetric approach.”113
    undefinedundefined

    In 2020, Russia used the COVID-19 pandemic to spread disinformation. In March, for example, various Russian state news sources reported that the U.S. initiated the coronavirus pandemic, that the U.S. deployed the virus as a “biological weapon,” or that the virus was a complete hoax created by the United States. Nor did Russia create this disinformation on its own; it relied on various theories created by China and Iran.114

    undefinedundefined

    In addition, Russia has sought to use disinformation to undermine NATO’s Enhanced Forward Presence (eFP) in the Baltics. In April 2017, for example, Russian hackers planted a false story about U.S. troops being poisoned by mustard gas in Latvia on the Baltic News Service website.115

    undefinedundefined
    Since 2017, a disinformation campaign nicknamed “ghostwriter” has been ongoing. In some cases, Russian hackers published false news stories “on real news websites without permission.” In one case, a Lithuanian news site published a fake article in 2019 “claiming that German soldiers had desecrated a Jewish cemetery,” and in another, a fake message was published on the Polish War Studies Academy website, purportedly from the organization’s commander, calling for troops “to fight against ‘the American occupation.’”116
    undefinedundefined

    U.S. troops stationed in Poland for NATO’s eFP have been the target of similar Russian disinformation campaigns.117

    undefinedundefined
    A fabricated interview with U.S. Army Europe commander Lieutenant General Christopher Cavoli that was published online was meant to undermine NATO’s reputation among the public.118
    undefinedundefined
    One report summarized that “Russia’s state propaganda channels RT and Sputnik remain very keen to exploit to the maximum any incidents involving eFP personnel, and to repeat the Kremlin’s anti-NATO and anti-eFP narrative.”119
    undefinedundefined
    In particular, more recent Russian propaganda has focused on portraying eFP as an “occupying force.”120
    undefinedundefined

    Russia has also demonstrated a willingness to use military force to change the borders of modern Europe. When Kremlin-backed Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych failed to sign an Association Agreement with the EU in 2013, months of street demonstrations led to his ouster early in 2014. Russia responded by sending troops, aided by pro-Russian local militia, to occupy the Crimean Peninsula under the pretext of “protecting Russian people.” This led to Russia’s eventual annexation of Crimea, the first such forcible annexation of territory in Europe since the Second World War.121

    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s annexation of Crimea has effectively cut Ukraine’s coastline in half, and Russia has claimed rights to underwater resources off the Crimean Peninsula.122

    undefinedundefined
    In May 2018, Russia inaugurated the first portion of a $7.5 billion, 11.8-mile bridge connecting Russia with Kerch in occupied Crimea. The project will be fully completed in 2023.123
    undefinedundefined
    The effect on Ukraine’s regional economic interests can be seen in the fact that 30 percent of the cargo ships that served Mariupol could not clear the span.124
    undefinedundefined
    In December 2019, Russia completed a new rail bridge over the Kerch Strait that the EU condemned as “yet another step toward a forced integration of the illegally annexed peninsula.”125
    undefinedundefined

    Russia has deployed 28,000 troops to Crimea and has embarked on a major program to build housing, restore airfields, and install new radars there.126

    undefinedundefined
    The Monolit-B radar system, for instance, has a passive range of 450 kilometers, and its deployment “provides the Russian military with an excellent real-time picture of the positions of foreign surface vessels operating in the Black Sea.”127
    undefinedundefined
    In addition, “Russian equipment there includes 40 main battle tanks, 680 armored personnel carriers and 174 artillery systems of various kinds” along with 113 combat aircraft.128
    undefinedundefined

    These numbers may be larger now, given Russia’s military buildup in Ukraine in April 2021.129

    undefinedundefined
    In March 2019, Russia announced the deployment of nuclear-capable Tupolev Tu-22M3 strategic bombers to Gvardeyskoye air base in occupied Crimea.130
    undefinedundefined

    Control of Crimea has allowed Russia to use the Black Sea as a platform to launch and support naval operations in the Eastern Mediterranean.131

    undefinedundefined
    The Black Sea fleet has received six Kilo diesel submarines and three Admiral Grigorovich–class frigates equipped with Kalibr-NK long-range cruise missiles.132
    undefinedundefined
    Russia is also planning to add Gorshkov-class frigates to its Black Sea fleet.133
    undefinedundefined
    Kalibrs have a range of at least 2,500 kilometers, placing cities from Rome to Vilnius within range of Black Sea–based cruise missiles.134
    undefinedundefined

    Russia has deployed five S-400 air defense systems with a potential range of around 250 miles to Crimea.135

    undefinedundefined
    Russia’s new S-350 air defense systems also have the potential to be deployed to Crimea.136
    undefinedundefined
    In addition, “local capabilities have been strengthened by the Pantsir-S1 (SA-22 Greyhound) short-to-medium-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) and anti-aircraft artillery weapons system, which particularly complements the S-400.”137
    undefinedundefined
    Russia also deploys the Bastion P coastal defenses armed with the P-800 Oniks anti-ship cruise missile, which “has a range of up to 300 kilometers and travels at nearly Mach 2.5, making it extraordinarily difficult to defeat with kinetic means.”138
    undefinedundefined

    In eastern Ukraine, Russia has helped to foment and sustain a separatist movement. Backed, armed, and trained by Russia, separatist leaders in eastern Ukraine have declared the so-called Lugansk People’s Republic and Donetsk People’s Republic. Moscow has backed separatist factions in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine with advanced weapons, technical and financial assistance, and Russian conventional and special operations forces. Approximately 3,000 Russian soldiers are operating in the Donbas region of Ukraine.139

    undefinedundefined
    Russian-backed separatists daily violate the September 2014 Minsk I and February 2015 Minsk II cease-fire agreements.140
    undefinedundefined
    These agreements have led to the de facto partition of Ukraine and have created a frozen conflict that remains both deadly and advantageous for Russia. As of April 2021, the war in Ukraine had cost an estimated 14,000 lives.141
    undefinedundefined

    On November 25, 2018, Russian forces blocked the passage of three Ukrainian naval vessels through the Kerch Strait and opened fire on the ships before boarding and seizing them along with 24 Ukrainian sailors.142

    undefinedundefined
    In September 2019, Russia released the sailors in a prisoner swap with Ukraine.143
    undefinedundefined
    Russian harassment of ships sailing through the Kerch Strait and impeding of free movement had taken place consistently before the November 2018 aggression and continued afterwards.144
    undefinedundefined
    Russian inspections of ships, blockages of the strait, and delays have coalesced to constrict the port of Mariupol, where shipping traffic has been greatly reduced since 2014.145
    undefinedundefined

    In Moldova, Russia supports the breakaway enclave of Transnistria, where yet another frozen conflict festers to Moscow’s liking. According to a Congressional Research Service report:

    Russia stations approximately 1,500 soldiers in Transnistria, a few hundred of which Moldova accepts as peacekeepers. In 2017, the Constitutional Court ruled that Russia’s troop presence in Moldova was unconstitutional, and parliament adopted a declaration calling on Russia to withdraw. In 2018, the U.N. General Assembly passed a resolution calling on Russia to withdraw its troops from Moldova “unconditionally and without further delay.”
    A political settlement to the Transnistrian conflict appears distant. The Moldovan government supports a special local governance status for Transnistria, but Russia and authorities in Transnistria have resisted agreement.
    The conflict-resolution process operates in a “5+2” format under the chairmanship of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), with the OSCE, Russia, and Ukraine as mediators and the EU and the United States as observers. The EU also supports conflict management through a Border Assistance Mission to Moldova and Ukraine (EUBAM). EUBAM seeks to help the two countries combat transborder crime, facilitate trade, and resolve the conflict over Transnistria, which shares a long border with Ukraine.146
    undefinedundefined

    Russia continues to occupy 12 percent of Moldova’s territory. In August 2018, Russian and separatist forces equipped with armored personnel carriers and armored reconnaissance vehicles exercised crossing the Dniester River in the demilitarized security zone. Moldovan authorities called the exercises “provocative,” and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Mission to Moldova “expresse[d] its concern.”147

    undefinedundefined
    On January 22, 2019, in an effort to enhance its control of the breakaway region, Russia opened an office in Moscow for the Official Representation of the Pridnestrovian Moldavian Republic in the Russian Federation.148
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s permanent stationing of Iskander missiles in Kaliningrad in 2018 occurred a year to the day after NATO’s eFP deployed to Lithuania.149

    undefinedundefined
    Russia reportedly has deployed tactical nuclear weapons, the S-400 air defense system, and P-800 anti-ship cruise missiles to Kaliningrad.150
    undefinedundefined
    Additionally, it plans to reestablish a tank brigade and a “fighter aviation regiment and naval assault aviation (bomber) regiment” in Kaliningrad and to reequip the artillery brigade with new systems.151
    undefinedundefined
    According to the IISS, the majority of Russian air force pilot graduates this past year were sent to Kaliningrad “to improve staffing” in the air force units located there.152
    undefinedundefined

    Russia also has outfitted a missile brigade in Luga, Russia, a mere 74 miles from the Estonian city of Narva, with Iskander missiles.153

    undefinedundefined
    Iskanders have been deployed to the Southern Military District at Mozdok near Georgia and Krasnodar near Ukraine as well, and Russian military officials have reportedly asked manufacturers to increase the Iskander missiles’ range and improve their accuracy.154
    undefinedundefined

    Nor is Russia deploying missiles only in Europe. In February 2018, Russia approved the deployment of warplanes to an airport on Iturup, one of the largest Kuril Islands.155

    undefinedundefined
    In September 2019, Russia announced its plans to deploy additional missile systems on Paramushir and Matua, two islands in the northern portion of the Kuril Island chain.156
    undefinedundefined
    In December 2020, Russia announced the deployment of S-300V4 air defense missile systems on Iturup.157
    undefinedundefined
    Russia has stationed 3,500 troops on the Kuril Islands. In December 2018, Japan lodged a formal complaint over the building of four new barracks.158
    undefinedundefined

    Russia has deployed additional troops and capabilities near its western borders. In May 2021, Russia announced plans to increase its troop presence along its western border “in response to what it views as an increasing threat from the United States and the NATO alliance.”159

    undefinedundefined
    In June 2020, one report revealed that the brigade in the Western Military District is relatively well-equipped with “modern weapons and specialist equipment, including ‘T-90A tanks, BTR-82A armored personnel carriers, BMP-3 combat vehicles, as well as 9A34 Strela-10 and 2S6M Tunguska air defense systems.’”160
    undefinedundefined

    According to a report published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs:
    Five dedicated storage and maintenance bases have been established in the Western Military District, and another one in the Southern Military District (and a further 15 in the Central and Eastern districts). These, similar to the US Army’s POMCUS (Prepositioning Of Materiel Configured in Unit Sets), contain pre-positioned, properly maintained brigade-level assets, and 2.5 units of fire for all equipments.161
    undefinedundefined

    Russia represents a real and potentially existential threat to NATO member countries in Eastern and Central Europe. Considering Russia’s aggression in Georgia and Ukraine, a conventional attack against a NATO member, while unlikely, cannot be ruled out entirely. In all likelihood, Russia will continue to use nonlinear means in an effort to pressure and undermine both these nations and the NATO alliance.

    Militarization of the High North. Russia has a long history in the Arctic and, as an Arctic nation, has interests there. However, Russia’s ongoing militarization of the region, coupled with its bellicose behavior toward its neighbors, makes the Arctic a security concern.

    Because nationalism is on the rise in Russia, Vladimir Putin’s Arctic strategy is popular among the population. For Putin, the Arctic is an area that allows Russia to flex its muscles without incurring any significant geopolitical risk.

    Russia is also eager to promote its economic interests in the region. Half of the world’s Arctic territory and half of the Arctic region’s population are located in Russia. It is well known that the Arctic is home to large stockpiles of proven and yet unexploited oil and gas reserves. The majority of these reserves are thought to be located in Russia. In particular, Russia hopes that the Northern Sea Route (NSR) will become one of the world’s most important shipping lanes.

    Russia has invested heavily in the Arctic region, opening a series of Arctic bases and investing in cold-weather equipment, coastal defense systems, underground storage facilities, and specialized training. Additionally, “Russian hardware in the High North area includes bombers and MiG31BM jets, and new radar systems close to the coast of Alaska.”162

    undefinedundefined

    Russia has also staged a series of statement activities in the Arctic. In 2007, Artur Chilingarov, then a member of the Russian Duma, led a submarine expedition to the North Pole and planted a Russian flag on the seabed. Later, he declared: “The Arctic is Russian.”163

    undefinedundefined
    In July 2017, Russia released a new naval doctrine citing the alleged “ambition of a range of states, and foremost the United States of America and its allies, to dominate the high seas, including in the Arctic, and to press for overwhelming superiority of their naval forces.”164
    undefinedundefined

    In May 2017, Russia announced that its build-up of the Northern Fleet’s nuclear capacity is intended “to phase ‘NATO out of [the] Arctic.’”165

    undefinedundefined
    A recent statement exercise occurred in March 2021, when three Russian ballistic missile submarines punched through the Arctic ice near the North Pole.166
    undefinedundefined

    In addition to an ongoing strong naval presence in the Arctic, Russia often undertakes aggressive Arctic flights. In one instance in March 2017, nine Russian bombers simulated an attack on the U.S.-funded, Norwegian-run radar installation at Vardø, Norway, above the Arctic Circle.167

    undefinedundefined
    In May 2017, 12 Russian aircraft simulated an attack against NATO naval forces taking part in the Eastern Atlantic Area (EASTLANT) 17 exercise near Tromsø, Norway, and later that month, Russian aircraft targeted aircraft from 12 nations that were taking part in the Arctic Challenge 2017 exercise near Bodø.168
    undefinedundefined
    In April 2018, Maritime Patrol aircraft from Russia’s Pacific Fleet for the first time exercised locating and bombing enemy submarines in the Arctic while fighter jets exercised repelling an air invasion in the Arctic region.169
    undefinedundefined

    Although the Arctic region has been an area of low conflict among the Arctic powers, NATO should consider the implications of Russia’s recent aggressive military behavior. NATO is a collective security organization designed to defend the territorial integrity of its members. Five NATO members (Canada, Denmark, Iceland, Norway, and the United States) are Arctic countries, and each has territory above the Arctic Circle. Two closely allied nations (Finland and Sweden) also have Arctic territory.

    The U.S. in recent years has begun to pay increased attention to the Arctic theater in Europe. One way has been by maintaining an enhanced presence in Norway. In April 2021, the two nations signed the Supplementary Defense Cooperation Agreement, which in part allows the U.S. to build additional infrastructure at Rygge and Sola air stations in southern Norway as well as Evenes air station and Ramsund naval station above the Arctic Circle.170

    undefinedundefined

    Construction at Evenes will support Norwegian and allied maritime patrol aircraft in monitoring Russian submarine activity.

    Because Russia is an Arctic power, its military presence in the region is to be expected, but it should be viewed with some caution because of Russia’s pattern of aggression. In the Arctic, sovereignty equals security. Respecting national sovereignty in the Arctic would ensure that the chances of armed conflict in the region remain low. Since NATO is an intergovernmental alliance of sovereign nation-states built on the consensus of all of its members, it has a role to play in Arctic security. In the words of NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg:

    Increased Russian presence, more Russian bases in the High North, has also triggered the need for more NATO presence, and we have increased our presence there with more naval capabilities, presence in the air, and not least, the importance of protecting transatlantic undersea cables transmitting a lot of data.171
    undefinedundefined

    In March 2017, a decree signed by Putin gave the Federal Security Service (FSB), which controls law enforcement along the Northern Sea Route, an Arctic shipping route linking Asia and Europe, additional powers to confiscate land “in areas with special objects for land use, and in the border areas.”172

    undefinedundefined
    Russia’s Arctic territory is included within this FSB-controlled border zone. The FSB and its subordinate coast guard have added patrol vessels and have built up Arctic bases, including a coast guard base in Murmansk that was opened in December 2018.173
    undefinedundefined

    The Russian National Guard, which reports to President Putin,174

    undefinedundefined
    is likewise taking on an increased role in the Arctic and is now charged with protecting infrastructure sites that are deemed to be of strategic importance, including a new liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal at Sabetta that was opened in December 2017.175
    undefinedundefined
    In April 2021, shareholders of Novatek, Russia’s second-largest natural gas producer, “approved external financing of $11 billion for the Arctic LNG 2 project, which is expected to start production of [LNG] in 2023.”176
    undefinedundefined

    In May 2018, Putin issued a presidential degree setting a target of 80 million tons shipped across the NSR by 2024.177

    undefinedundefined
    In December 2020, Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear power company, announced that it had shipped a record 32 million tons on the NSR in 2020. This surpassed the original target of 29 million tons.178
    undefinedundefined
    In March 2019, Russian media reported that the government was drafting stringent navigation rules for the entire length of the NSR outside Russian territorial waters. Under these rules, for example, foreign navies would be required to “post a request with Russian authorities to pass through the Sevmorput [NSR] 45 days in advance, providing detailed technical information about the ship, its crew and destination.”179
    undefinedundefined

    Russia also has been investing in military bases in the Arctic. Its base on Alexandra Land, commissioned in 2017, can house 150 soldiers autonomously for up to 18 months.180

    undefinedundefined

    In addition, old Soviet-era facilities have been reopened.

    In September 2018, the Northern Fleet announced construction plans for a new military complex to house a 100-soldier garrison and anti-aircraft units at Tiksi; in January 2019, Russian authorities claimed that the base was 95 percent completed.181

    undefinedundefined
    Also in 2018, Russia opened an Arctic airfield at Nagurskoye that is equipped with a 2,500-meter landing strip and a fleet of MiG-31 or Su-34 Russian fighters.182
    undefinedundefined

    Air power in the Arctic is increasingly important to Russia, which has 14 operational airfields in the region along with 16 deep-water ports.183

    undefinedundefined
    According to a March 18, 2021, Forbes report, “the Russian navy has tasked a regiment of upgraded MiG-31BM [interceptor aircraft] to skip and hop across Arctic airfields in order to range across the cold-but-rapidly-thawing North Pole.”184
    undefinedundefined
    In March 2019, Mayor General Igor Kozhin, head of the Russian Naval Air Force, claimed that Russia had successfully tested a new airstrip cover that is effective in “temperatures down to minus 30 centigrades.”185
    undefinedundefined

    Russia resumed regular fighter jet combat patrols in the Arctic in 2019.186

    undefinedundefined
    The Ministry of Defense, for example, announced that in January 2019, two Tu-160 bombers flew for 15 hours in international airspace over the Arctic.187
    undefinedundefined
    Over the course of one week in April 2019, Russian fighter and bomber jets flew near the coast of Norway twice. In one instance, two Tu-60 bombers and a MiG-31 flew 13 hours over the Barents, Norwegian, and North Seas. British and Danish jets scrambled to meet the Russian aircraft.188
    undefinedundefined

    Russian Arctic flights are often aggressive. In May 2017, 12 Russian aircraft simulated an attack against NATO naval forces taking part in the EASTLANT 17 exercise near Tromsø, Norway, and later that month, Russian aircraft targeted aircraft from 12 nations, including the U.S., that took part in the Arctic Challenge 2017 exercise near Bodø.189

    undefinedundefined
    As noted previously, in April 2018, Maritime Patrol aircraft from Russia’s Pacific Fleet for the first time exercised locating and bombing enemy submarines in the Arctic while fighter jets exercised repelling an air invasion in the Arctic region.190
    undefinedundefined
    In March 2020, two Russian strategic heavy bombers flew over U.S. submarines surfaced in the Arctic Ocean, and in April, two maritime Tu-142 reconnaissance and anti-submarine warfare planes flew over the Barents, Norwegian, and North Seas.191
    undefinedundefined

    In 2017, Russia activated a new radar complex on Wrangel Island.192

    undefinedundefined
    In 2019, it announced plans to lay a nearly 8,000-mile fiber-optic cable across its Arctic coast, linking military installations along the way from the Kola Peninsula through Vladivostok.193
    undefinedundefined
    Construction of the cable began in spring 2021.194
    undefinedundefined

    In November 2019, Russia announced rocket firings in the Norwegian Sea 20 to 40 nautical miles from the Norwegian coast. The test firings, with little advance notice, were designed to send a message as they took place in an area through which NATO ships were sailing during the Trident Juncture exercise.195

    undefinedundefined
    In March 2021, Russia’s Admiral Gorshkov frigate successfully “launched an Oniks cruise missile and hit a coastal target on Novaya Zemlya, about 300 kilometers from launch position.”196
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s ultimate goal is encapsulated in a June 2019 study published by the Royal Institute of International Affairs:

    Since the mid-2010s, the Kremlin has deployed substantive force and capabilities along the coast of its northern border in the AZRF [Arctic Zone of the Russian Federation]. Parts of the armed forces are now Arctic-capable, and have developed concepts of operations tailored to that environment. With the creation of OSK Sever [Joint Strategic Command North] in 2013, the Russian armed forces have been slowly reshaping their Arctic command structure. The Arctic forces are primarily focused on air and naval operations, with the aim of creating an integrated combined-arms force for the region.197
    undefinedundefined

    For a few years, Russia was developing three new nuclear icebreakers, and in May 2019, it launched its third and final Arktika.198

    undefinedundefined
    The Arktika, currently the world’s largest and most powerful nuclear icebreaker,199
    undefinedundefined
    sailed straight to the North Pole in October 2020.200
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s most recently released naval doctrine, from July 2017, cites the alleged “ambition of a range of states, and foremost the United States of America and its allies, to dominate the high seas, including in the Arctic, and to press for overwhelming superiority of their naval forces.”201

    undefinedundefined
    In May 2017, Russia had announced that its buildup of the Northern Fleet’s nuclear capacity is intended “to phase ‘NATO out of [the] Arctic.’”202
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s Northern Fleet is also building newly refitted submarines, including a newly converted Belgorod nuclear-powered submarine that was launched in April 2019.203

    undefinedundefined
    The Belgorod is expected to carry six Poseidon drones, also known as nuclear torpedoes, and will carry out “a series of special missions.”204
    undefinedundefined
    The submarine will have a smaller minisub that will potentially be capable of tampering with or destroying undersea telecommunications cables.205
    undefinedundefined
    According to Russian media reports, the Belgorod“will be engaged in studying the bottom of the Russian Arctic shelf, searching for minerals at great depths, and also laying underwater communications.”206
    undefinedundefined
    A similar submarine, the Khabarovsk, is under construction and scheduled to be launched in the fall of 2021.207
    undefinedundefined

    Russia continues to develop and increase its military capabilities in the Arctic region. The likelihood of armed conflict remains low, but physical changes in the region mean that the posture of players will continue to evolve. It is clear that Russia intends to exert a dominant influence. According to a U.S. Department of State official, as quoted in a Congressional Research Service report:

    [The U.S. has] concerns about Russia’s military buildup in the Arctic. Its presence has grown dramatically in recent years with the establishments of new Arctic commands, new Arctic brigades, refurbished airfields and other infrastructure, deep water ports, new military bases along its Arctic coastline, an effort to establish air defense and coastal missile systems, early warning radars, and a variety of other things along the Arctic coastline. We’ve seen an enhanced ops [operations] tempo of the Russian military in the Arctic, including last October one of the largest Russian military exercises in the Arctic since the end of the Cold War. So there is some genuine and legitimate concern there on the part of the United States and our allies and partners about that behavior in the Arctic.208
    undefinedundefined

    Destabilization in the South Caucasus. The South Caucasus sits at a crucial geographical and cultural crossroads and has been strategically important, both militarily and economically, for centuries. Although the countries in the region (Armenia, Georgia, and Azerbaijan) are not part of NATO and therefore do not receive a security guarantee from the United States, they have participated to varying degrees in NATO and U.S.-led operations. This is especially true of Georgia, which aspires to join NATO.

    Russia views the South Caucasus as part of its natural sphere of influence and stands ready to exert its influence by force if necessary. In August 2008, Russia invaded Georgia, coming as close as 15 miles to the capital city of Tbilisi. A decade later, several thousand Russian troops occupied the two Georgian regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

    Russia has sought to deepen its relationship with the two occupied regions. In 2015, it signed so-called integration treaties with South Ossetia and Abkhazia that, among other things, call for a coordinated foreign policy, creation of a common security and defense space, and implementation of a streamlined process for Abkhazians and South Ossetians to receive Russian citizenship.209

    undefinedundefined
    The Georgian Foreign Ministry criticized the treaties as a step toward “annexation of Georgia’s occupied territories,”210
    undefinedundefined

    both of which are still internationally recognized as part of Georgia.

    In January 2018, Russia ratified an agreement with the de facto leaders of South Ossetia to create a joint military force—an agreement that the U.S. condemned.211

    undefinedundefined
    In November 2017, the U.S. State Department approved an estimated $75 million sale of Javelin missiles to Georgia, and in June 2018, the State Department approved a sale of Stinger missiles.212
    undefinedundefined
    Russia’s “creeping annexation” of Georgia has left towns split in two and families separated by military occupation and the imposition of an internal border (known as “borderization”).213
    undefinedundefined
    In May 2020, the U.S. Embassy in Tbilisi reported that Russian-led security forces were continuing to erect unauthorized fences and reinforcing existing illegal “borderization” efforts near a number of Georgian villages.214
    undefinedundefined

    Today, Moscow continues to exploit ethnic divisions and tensions in the South Caucasus to advance pro-Russian policies that are often at odds with America’s or NATO’s goals in the region, but Russia’s influence is not restricted to soft power. In the South Caucasus, the coin of the realm is military might. It is a dangerous neighborhood surrounded by instability and insecurity reflected in terrorism, religious fanaticism, centuries-old sectarian divides, and competition for natural resources.

    Russia maintains a sizable military presence in Armenia based on an agreement that gives Moscow access to bases in that country until at least 2044.215

    undefinedundefined
    The bulk of Russia’s forces, consisting of 3,300 soldiers, dozens of fighter planes and attack helicopters, 74 T-72 tanks, almost 200 APCs, and an S-300 air defense system, are based around the 102nd Military Base.216
    undefinedundefined
    Russia and Armenia have also signed a Combined Regional Air Defense System agreement. Even after the election of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan following the so-called Velvet Revolution, Armenia’s cozy relationship with Moscow remains unchanged.217
    undefinedundefined
    Armenian troops have even deployed alongside Russian troops in Syria to the dismay of U.S. policymakers.218
    undefinedundefined

    Another source of regional instability is the Nagorno–Karabakh conflict, which began in 1988 when Armenia made territorial claims to Azerbaijan’s Nagorno–Karabakh Autonomous Oblast.219

    undefinedundefined
    By 1992, Armenian forces and Armenian-backed militias had occupied 20 percent of Azerbaijan, including the Nagorno–Karabakh region and seven surrounding districts. A cease-fire agreement was signed in 1994, and the conflict has been described as frozen since then. In 2020, major fighting broke out along the front lines. After six weeks of fighting, Azerbaijan liberated its internationally recognized territory, “which had been under Armenian occupation since the early 1990s.”220
    undefinedundefined

    The conflict ended on November 9, 2020, when Armenia and Azerbaijan signed a Russian-brokered cease-fire agreement.221

    undefinedundefined
    As part of the nine-point cease-fire plan, nearly 2,000 Russian peacekeeping soldiers were deployed to certain parts of Nagorno-Karabakh largely populated by ethnic Armenians. In May 2021, tensions rose again in the region but for a different reason—the demarcation of the Armenian–Azerbaijani border.222
    undefinedundefined

    The Nagorno–Karabakh conflict offers another opportunity for Russia to exert malign influence and consolidate power in the region. While its sympathies lie with Armenia, Russia is the largest supplier of weapons to both Armenia and Azerbaijan.223

    undefinedundefined
    As noted by Eurasia expert Eduard Abrahamyan, “for years, Moscow has periodically sought to use the local authorities in Karabakh as a proxy tool of coercive diplomacy against both Baku and Yerevan.”224
    undefinedundefined

    The South Caucasus might seem distant to many American policymakers, but the spillover effect of ongoing conflict in the region can have a direct impact both on U.S. interests and on the security of America’s partners, as well as on Turkey and other countries that depend on oil and gas transiting the region. Russia views the South Caucasus as a vital theater and uses a multitude of tools that include military aggression, economic pressure, and the stoking of ethnic tensions to exert influence and control, usually to promote outcomes that are at odds with U.S. interests.

    Increased Activity in the Mediterranean. Russia has had a military presence in Syria for decades, but in September 2015, it became the decisive actor in Syria’s ongoing civil war, having saved Bashar al-Assad from being overthrown and having strengthened his hand militarily, thus enabling government forces to retake territory lost during the war. Although conflicting strategic interests cause the relationship between Assad and Putin to be strained at times, Assad still needs Russian military support to take back Idlib province, a goal that he likely shares with Putin.225

    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s Hmeymim Air Base is closely located to Idlib, a source of attacks from rebel fighters and terrorist groups, and Moscow instinctively desires to protect its assets. Assad’s only goal is to restore sovereignty over all of Syria; Russia generally is more focused on eliminating terrorism in the region and must manage its relationship with Turkey.

    2022_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength_MAP_12.gif

    In January 2017, Russia signed an agreement with the Assad regime to “expand the Tartus naval facility, Russia’s only naval foothold in the Mediterranean, and grant Russian warships access to Syrian waters and ports…. The agreement will last for 49 years and could be prolonged further.”226

    undefinedundefined
    According to a May 2020 report, Russia is reinforcing its naval group in the Mediterranean Sea with warships and submarines armed with Kalibr cruise missiles.227
    undefinedundefined
    In May 2021, the Voice of America reported that Russia is expanding its navy base at Tartus and “planning to construct a floating dock to boost the port’s ship repair facilities.”228
    undefinedundefined

    The agreement with Syria also includes upgrades to the Hmeymim air base at Latakia, including repairs to a second runway.229

    undefinedundefined
    Russia deployed the S-400 anti-aircraft missile system to Hmeymim in late 2015.230
    undefinedundefined
    It also has deployed the Pantsir S1 system. “The two systems working in tandem provide a ‘layered defense,’” according to one account, “with the S-400 providing long-ranged protection against bombers, fighter jets, and ballistic missiles, and the Pantsir providing medium-ranged protection against cruise missiles, low-flying strike aircraft, and drones.”231
    undefinedundefined
    Russia currently operates out of Hmeymim air base on a 40-year agreement and continues to entrench its position there, as demonstrated by its recent building of reinforced concrete aircraft shelters.232
    undefinedundefined
    In August 2020, Syria agreed to give Russia additional land and coastal waters to expand its Hmeymim air base.233
    undefinedundefined

    Russia is using Syria as a testing ground for new weapons systems while obtaining valuable combat experience for its troops. According to Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, former Commander, U.S. Army Europe, Russia has used its intervention in Syria as a “live-fire training opportunity.”234

    undefinedundefined
    The IISS similarly reports that Russia has used Syria as “a test bed for the development of joint operations and new weapons and tactics.”235
    undefinedundefined

    In fact, Russia has tested hundreds of pieces of new equipment in Syria. In December 2018:
    Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yury Borisov detailed to local media…the various new weapons systems [that] have been introduced to the conflict. These included the Pantsir S1 anti-aircraft and Iskander-M ballistic missile systems on the ground, Tupolev Tu-160 supersonic strategic bombers, Tu-22M3 supersonic bombers and Tu-95 propeller-driven bombers, as well as Mikoyan MiG-29K fighters and Ka-52K Katran helicopters in the air.236
    undefinedundefined

    Overall, Russian arms sales abroad reportedly exceeded $13 billion in 2019, surpassing sales in 2018 by more than $2 billion.237

    undefinedundefined

    Russian pilots have occasionally acted dangerously in the skies over Syria. In May 2017, for example, a Russian fighter jet intercepted a U.S. KC-10 tanker, performing a barrel roll over the top of the KC-10.238

    undefinedundefined
    That same month, Russia stated that U.S. and allied aircraft would be banned from flying over large areas of Syria because of a deal agreed to by Russia, Iran, and Turkey. The U.S. responded that the deal does not “preclude anyone from going after terrorists wherever they may be in Syria.”239
    undefinedundefined

    The U.S. and Russia have a deconfliction hotline to avoid midair collisions and incidents, but incidents have occurred on the ground as well as in the air. In November 2018, Ambassador James Jeffrey, U.S. Special Representative for Syria Engagement, told news media that “American and Russian forces have clashed a dozen times in Syria—sometimes with exchanges of fire.”240

    undefinedundefined

    In October 2018, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi signed a strategic cooperation treaty with Russia.241

    undefinedundefined
    In November 2018, Russia sought to solidify its relations with Egypt, approving a five-year agreement for the two countries to use each other’s air bases.242
    undefinedundefined
    Russia is a major exporter of arms to Egypt, which agreed to purchase 20 Su-35 fighter jets in 2018 for $2 billion.243
    undefinedundefined
    Production of the Su-35 jets began in May 2020.244
    undefinedundefined

    In Libya, Russia continues to support Field Marshal Khalifa Haftar with weapons and military advisers. According to the Department of Defense, Russia’s Wagner Group continues to be involved militarily in Libya.245

    undefinedundefined
    Despite its ties to Haftar, Russia has also focused on growing business ties with the Libyan government in Tripoli.246
    undefinedundefined

    Russia has stepped up its military operations in the Mediterranean significantly, often harassing U.S. and allied vessels involved in operations against the Islamic State. In April 2020, for example, a U.S. Navy aircraft over the Mediterranean Sea was intercepted by a Russian Su-35 jet—the second time in four days that “Russian pilots made unsafe maneuvers while intercepting US aircraft.”247

    undefinedundefined
    The Russian jet had taken off from Hmeymim air base in Syria. This happened again in May when two Russian Su-35 jets unsafely intercepted a U.S. Navy P-8A maritime patrol aircraft over international waters in the Eastern Mediterranean.248
    undefinedundefined

    From April–August 2017, the U.S. along with British, Dutch, and Spanish allies tracked the Krasnodar, a Kilo-class submarine, as it sailed from the Baltic Sea to a Russian base in occupied Crimea. The submarine stopped twice in the eastern Mediterranean to launch cruise missiles into Syria and conducted drills in the Baltic Sea and off the coast of Libya. This was one of the first times since the Cold War that the U.S. and NATO allies had tracked a Russian submarine during combat operations.249

    undefinedundefined
    In February 2020, General Wolters revealed that Russian submarines are becoming more active and harder for the United States to track.250
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s position in Syria, including its expanded area-access/area-denialcapabilities and increased warship and submarine presence, underscores the growing importance of the Mediterranean theater in ensuring Europe’s security.

    The Balkans. Security has improved dramatically in the Balkans since the 1990s, but violence based on religious and ethnic differences remains an ongoing possibility. These tensions are exacerbated by sluggish economies, high unemployment, and political corruption.

    Russia’s interests in the Western Balkans are at odds with the ongoing desire of the U.S. and its European allies to encourage closer ties between the region and the transatlantic community:

    Russia seeks to sever the transatlantic bond forged with the Western Balkans…by sowing instability. Chiefly Russia has sought to inflame preexisting ethnic, historic, and religious tensions. Russian propaganda magnifies this toxic ethnic and religious messaging, fans public disillusionment with the West, as well as institutions inside the Balkan nations, and misinforms the public about Russia’s intentions and interests in the region.251
    undefinedundefined

    Senior members of the Russian government have alleged that NATO enlargement in the Balkans is one of the biggest threats to Russia.252

    undefinedundefined

    In June 2017, Montenegro became NATO’s 29th member state, and in March 2020, North Macedonia became NATO’s 30th member state, both joining Albania and Croatia as NATO members in the Balkans.

    Russia stands accused of being behind a failed plot to break into Montenegro’s parliament on election day in 2016, assassinate its former prime minister, and install a pro-Russian government. In May 2019, two Russian nationals, believed to be the masterminds behind the plot, were convicted in absentia along with 12 other individuals for organizing and carrying out the failed coup. The trial judge stated that the convicted Russians who organized the plot “knowingly tried to terrorize Montenegrins, attack others, threaten and hurt basic constitutional and social structures.”253

    undefinedundefined

    After Russia annexed Crimea, the Montenegrin government backed European sanctions against Moscow and even implemented its own sanctions. Nevertheless, Russia has significant economic influence in Montenegro and in 2015 sought unsuccessfully to gain access to Montenegrin ports for the Russian navy to refuel and perform maintenance. Russia was the largest investor in Montenegro until October 2020, when it was surpassed by China.254

    undefinedundefined

    North Macedonia’s accession to NATO was similarly targeted by Russia, which had warned the nation against joining the alliance and sought to derail the Prespa agreement that paved the way for membership by settling long-standing Greek objections to Macedonia’s name.255

    undefinedundefined
    In 2018, after North Macedonia was invited to join NATO, Russia’s ambassador to the EU stated that “there are errors that have consequences.”256
    undefinedundefined
    In July 2018, Greece expelled two Russian diplomats and banned entry by two Russian nationals because of their efforts to undermine the name agreement; Russian actions in Macedonia included disinformation surrounding the vote, websites and social media posts opposing the Prespa agreement, and payments to protestors as well as politicians and organizations opposing the agreement.257
    undefinedundefined

    Serbia in particular has long served as Russia’s foothold in the Balkans:

    Russia’s influence in the Balkans centers on Serbia, a fellow religiously orthodox nation with whom it enjoys a close economic, political, and military relationship. Serbia and Russia have an agreement in place allowing Russian soldiers to be based at Niš airport in Serbia. The two countries signed a 15-year military cooperation agreement in 2013 that includes sharing of intelligence, officer exchanges, and joint military exercises. In October [2017], Russia gave Serbia six MiG-29 fighters (which while free, will require Serbia to spend $235 million to have them overhauled). Additionally, Russia plans to supply Serbia with helicopters, T-72 tanks, armored vehicles, and potentially even surface-to-air missile systems.258
    undefinedundefined

    The so-called Russian–Serbian Humanitarian Center at Niš is “widely believed to be a Russian spy base” and is located “only 58 miles from NATO’s Kosovo Force mission based in Pristina.”259

    undefinedundefined

    In February 2020, Serbia purchased the Pantsir S1 air-defense system from Russia despite objections and potential sanctions from the United States.260

    undefinedundefined
    Russia has used its cultural ties to increase its role in Serbia, positioning itself as the defender of orthodoxy and investing funds in the refurbishing of orthodox churches. It also has helped to establish more than 100 pro-Russian non-governmental organizations and media outlets in Macedonia.261
    undefinedundefined

    Serbia and Russia have signed a strategic partnership agreement that is focused on economic issues. Russia’s inward investment is focused on the transport and energy sectors. Except for those in the Commonwealth of Independent States, Serbia is the only country in Europe that has a free trade deal with Russia. In January 2019, Serbia and Russia signed 26 agreements relating to energy, railway construction, and strategic education cooperation.262

    undefinedundefined

    In a January 2019 state visit to Serbia, Vladimir Putin stated a desire for a free trade agreement between Serbia and the Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union, to be signed by the end of the year. An agreement between the two countries was signed in October 2019 “following veiled warnings from the European Union.”263

    undefinedundefined
    In addition, Russia has held out the possibility of $1.4 billion in infrastructure aid to Serbia aimed at building the Turk Stream pipeline and increasing Russia’s energy leverage in the region. Russia also has continued to oppose Kosovo’s recognition as an independent sovereign country and has condemned Kosovo’s creation of its own army.264
    undefinedundefined

    However, Serbia still participates in military exercises far more often without Russia than with Russia. “In 2017,” for example, “Serbian forces participated in 2 joint exercises with Russia and Belarus but held 13 exercises with NATO members and 7 with U.S. units.”265

    undefinedundefined

    Like Russia, Serbia is a member of NATO’s Partnership for Peace program. Additionally, Serbia has been part of the U.S. National Guard’s State Partnership Program, partnering with the State of Ohio since 2006.

    Russia is also active in Bosnia and Herzegovina—specifically, the ethnically Serb Republika Srpska, one of two substate entities inside Bosnia and Herzegovina that emerged from that country’s civil war in the 1990s. Moscow knows that exploiting internal ethnic and religious divisions among the country’s Bosniak, Croat, and Serb populations is the easiest way to prevent Bosnia and Herzegovina from entering the transatlantic community.

    Republika Srpska’s current unofficial leader, Milorad Dodik, has long advocated independence for the region and has enjoyed a very close relationship with the Kremlin. President Željka Cvijanović also claims that Republika Srpska will continue to maintain its partnership with Russia.266

    undefinedundefined
    Recent events in Ukraine, especially the annexation of Crimea, have inspired more separatist rhetoric in Republika Srpska. In September 2018, two weeks before elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov visited Sarajevo, but he also visited Banja Luka in Republika Srpska, where he visited the site of “a future Serbian–Russian Orthodox cultural center.”267
    undefinedundefined

    In many ways, Russia’s relationship with Republika Srpska is akin to its relationship with Georgia’s South Ossetia and Abkhazia occupied regions: more like a relationship with another sovereign state than a relationship with a semiautonomous region inside Bosnia and Herzegovina. When Putin visited Serbia in October 2014, Dodik was treated like a head of state and invited to Belgrade to meet with him. In September 2016, Dodik was treated like a head of state on a visit to Moscow just days before a referendum that chose January 9 as Republika Srpska’s “statehood day,” a date filled with religious and ethnic symbolism for the Serbs.268

    undefinedundefined
    In October 2018, just days before elections, Dodik again visited Russia where he watched the Russian Grand Prix in a VIP box with Putin.269
    undefinedundefined
    Republika Srpska continues to host its “statehood day” in defiance of a ruling by Bosnia’s federal constitutional court that both the celebration and the referendum establishing it were illegal.270
    undefinedundefined

    On January 9, 2020, Bosnian Serbs again held “statehood day.”271

    undefinedundefined
    At the 2018 “statehood day,” then-president Dodik and the self-proclaimed leaders of South Ossetia had “signed a memorandum on cooperation between the ‘states.’”272
    undefinedundefined
    Russia has reportedly trained a Republika Srpska paramilitary force in Russia at the nearby Niš air base to defend the Serbian entity. It has been reported that “[s]ome of its members fought as mercenaries alongside the Kremlin’s proxy separatists in Ukraine.”273
    undefinedundefined
    Veterans organizations in Russia and Republika Srpska have developed close ties.274
    undefinedundefined

    Russia has cultivated strong ties with the security forces of Republika Srpska. Russian police take part in exchanges with the security forces, and Russian intelligence officers reportedly teach at the police academy and local university. On April 4, 2018, the Republika Srpska authorities opened a new $4 million training center “at the site of a former army barracks in Zaluzani, outside Banja Luka.” The site serves as the headquarters for “anti-terrorist units, logistics units, and a department to combat organized crime.”275

    undefinedundefined

    Russia does not want Kosovo to be seen as a successful nation pointed toward the West. Rather, it seeks to derail Kosovo’s efforts to integrate into the West, often by exploiting the Serbian minority’s grievances. In the most jarring example, in January 2017, a train traveling from Belgrade to Mitrovica, a heavily Serb town in Kosovo, was stopped at the Kosovar border. The Russian-made train was “painted in the colors of the Serbian flag and featured pictures of churches, monasteries, and medieval towns, as well as the words ‘Kosovo is Serbian’ in 21 languages.”276

    undefinedundefined

    The U.S. has invested heavily in the Balkans since the end of the Cold War. Tens of thousands of U.S. servicemembers have served in the Balkans, and the U.S. has spent billions of dollars in aid there, all in the hope of creating a secure and prosperous region that will someday be part of the transatlantic community.

    The foremost external threat to the Balkans is Russia. Russia’s interests in the Balkans are at odds with the U.S. goal of encouraging the region to progress toward the transatlantic community. Russia seeks to sever the transatlantic bond forged with the Western Balkans by sowing instability and increasing its economic, political, and military footprint in the region.

    Threats to the Commons

    Other than cyberspace and (to some extent) airspace, the commons are relatively secure in the European region. Despite Russia’s periodic aggressive maneuvers near U.S. and NATO vessels—and with the significant exception of the Kerch Strait—this remains largely true with respect to the security of and free passage through shipping lanes. The maritime domain is heavily patrolled by the navies and coast guards of NATO and NATO partner countries, and except in remote areas in the Arctic Sea, search and rescue capabilities are readily available. Moreover, maritime-launched terrorism is not a significant problem, and piracy is virtually nonexistent.

    Sea. In May 2018, 17 Russian fighter jets buzzed the HMS Duncan, which was serving as the flagship of Standing NATO Maritime Group Two (SNMG2), operating in the Black Sea. Commodore Mike Utley, who was leading SNMG2, stated that the ship was “probably the only maritime asset that has seen a raid of that magnitude in the last 25 years,” and then-British Defense Minister Gavin Williamson described the behavior as “brazen Russian hostility.”277

    undefinedundefined
    In April 2018, a fully armed Russian jet buzzed a French frigate operating in the eastern Mediterranean.278
    undefinedundefined

    Russian threats to the maritime theater also include activity near undersea fiber-optic cables. In July 2019, a Russian submarine reportedly was trying to tap information flowing through undersea cables near Russia’s northern shore in the Barents Sea. The cables “carry 95 percent of daily worldwide communications” in addition to “financial transactions worth over $10 trillion a day.”279

    undefinedundefined

    Thus, any disruption would cause a catastrophic reduction in the flow of capital.

    The Yantar, a mother ship to two Russian minisubmersibles, is often seen near undersea cables, which it is capable of tapping or cutting, and has been observed collecting intelligence near U.S. naval facilities, including the submarine base at Kings Bay, Georgia.280

    undefinedundefined
    The Russian spy ship Viktor Leonov was spotted collecting intelligence within 20 miles of Kings Bay in March 2017 and within 30 miles of Groton, Connecticut, in February 2018.281
    undefinedundefined

    Airspace. Russia has continued its provocative military flights near U.S. and European airspace over the past year. In April 2021, Lieutenant General David Krumm from Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson, Alaska, revealed that during the past year, there was a large increase in Russian activity and the U.S. intercepted more than 60 Russian aircraft.282

    undefinedundefined
    That was the “most action the Alaska Air Defense Identification Zone—a region spanning 200 nautical miles that reaches past U.S. territory and into international airspace—ha[d] seen since the Soviet Union fell in 1991.”283
    undefinedundefined
    In October 2020, F-22 Raptor stealth fighter jets scrambled “to intercept Russian long-range bombers and fighters flying off Alaska’s coast” in “the 14th such incident off Alaska’s coast in 2020.”284
    undefinedundefined

    In March and April 2019, the Royal Air Force scrambled fighters twice in five days to intercept Russian bombers flying near U.K. airspace off Scotland while the U.S., Australia, and 11 NATO allies were taking part in the Joint Warrior exercise in Scotland.285

    undefinedundefined
    Also in March 2019, Italian jets operating from Keflavík in Iceland intercepted two Russian Tu-142 Bear bombers flying in Iceland’s air surveillance area.286
    undefinedundefined

    Aggressive Russian flying has occurred near North American airspace as well. In January 2019, two U.S. F-22s and two Canadian CF-18 fighters scrambled when two Russian Tu-160 Blackjack bombers flew into Arctic airspace patrolled by the Royal Canadian Air Force.287

    undefinedundefined

    Russian flights have also targeted U.S. ally Japan. Twice in one day in June 2019, two Russian Tupolev Tu-95 bombers entered Japanese airspace—over Minamidaito Island east of Okinawa and over Hachijo Island southeast of Tokyo. Japan sent out fighter jets to warn them.288

    undefinedundefined
    In incidents in January, March, and May 2019, Japan scrambled fighter jets to intercept a Russian Il-38N maritime patrol aircraft (MPA) flying over the Sea of Japan.289
    undefinedundefined
    Nor is it only MPAs that fly near Japan; for instance, Russian Su-24 attack aircraft were intercepted in December 2018 and January 2019 incidents.290
    undefinedundefined
    Between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2019, Japan had to scramble jets 343 times to intercept Russian aircraft, although that was 47 times less than was necessary in the preceding year.291
    undefinedundefined

    The principal threat from Russian airspace incursions, however, remains near NATO territory in Eastern Europe, specifically in the Black Sea and Baltic regions. In the Black Sea region, in December 2020, Russia scrambled one of its Su-30 fighter jets to prevent U.S. and French reconnaissance planes from crossing the Russian border, even though they were flying over international waters.292

    undefinedundefined
    In March 2021, NATO fighter jets scrambled 10 times in one day “to shadow Russian bombers and fighters during an unusual peak of flights over the North Atlantic, North Sea, Black Sea and Baltic Sea.”293
    undefinedundefined
    In the Baltics, in April 2021, “NATO scrambled fighter jets from bases in Estonia, Lithuania and Poland to track and intercept Russian fighters, bombers and surveillance aircraft over the Baltic Sea.”294
    undefinedundefined

    There have been several incidents involving Russian military aircraft flying in Europe without using their transponders. In April 2020, two maritime Tu-142 reconnaissance and anti-submarine warfare planes flew over the Barents, Norwegian, and North Seas but had switched off their transponders. As a result, two Norwegian F-16s were scrambled to identify the planes.295

    undefinedundefined
    In September 2019, a Russian Air Force Sukhoi Su-34 fighter flew over Estonian airspace without filing a flight plan or maintaining radio contact with Estonian air navigation officials because the plane’s transponder had been switched off. This was the second violation of Estonia’s airspace by a Russian aircraft in 2019.296
    undefinedundefined
    In August 2019, two Russian Su-27 escort jets flew over the Baltic Sea without a flight plan and without turning on their transponders.297
    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s violation of the sovereign airspace of NATO member states is a probing and antagonistic policy that is designed both to test the defense of the alliance and as practice for potential future conflicts. Similarly, Russia’s antagonistic behavior in international waters is a threat to freedom of the seas.

    Russia’s reckless aerial activity in the region also remains a threat to civilian aircraft flying in European airspace. That the provocative and hazardous behavior of the Russian armed forces or Russian-sponsored groups poses a threat to civilian aircraft in Europe was amply demonstrated by the July 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight MH17, killing all 283 passengers and 15 crewmembers, over the skies of southeastern Ukraine.

    Cyber. Russian cyber capabilities are sophisticated and active, regularly threatening economic, social, and political targets around the world. Even more, Moscow appears to be increasingly aggressive in its use of digital techniques, often employing only the slightest veneer of deniability in an effort to intimidate targets and openly defy international norms and organizations.

    Russia clearly believes that these online operations will be essential to its domestic and foreign policy for the foreseeable future. As former Chief of the Russian General Staff General Yuri Baluyevsky has observed, “a victory in information warfare ‘can be much more important than victory in a classical military conflict, because it is bloodless, yet the impact is overwhelming and can paralyse all of the enemy state’s power structures.’”298

    undefinedundefined

    Russia continues to probe U.S. critical infrastructure. In January 2019, testifying before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, then-Director of National Intelligence Daniel R. Coats assessed that:

    Russia has the ability to execute cyber attacks in the United States that generate localized, temporary disruptive effects on critical infrastructure—such as disrupting an electrical distribution network for at least a few hours—similar to those demonstrated in Ukraine in 2015 and 2016. Moscow is mapping our critical infrastructure with the long-term goal of being able to cause substantial damage.299
    undefinedundefined

    Russia continued to conduct cyberattacks on government and private entities in 2020 and 2021. In December 2020, Russian hackers “broke into a range of key government networks, including in the Treasury and Commerce Departments, and had free access to their email systems.”300

    undefinedundefined
    According to The New York Times, “[a]bout 18,000 private and government users downloaded a Russian tainted software update—a Trojan horse of sorts—that gave its hackers a foothold into victims’ systems, according to SolarWinds, the company whose software was compromised.”301
    undefinedundefined
    Multiple U.S. government agencies, the Pentagon, nuclear labs, and several Fortune 500 companies had been using the SolarWinds software on their computers.302
    undefinedundefined

    In April 2021, the U.S. Treasury sanctioned Russia for the SolarWinds hack. It also sanctioned 32 Russian “entities and individuals” who had carried out “Russian government-directed attempts to influence the 2020 U.S. presidential election, and other acts of disinformation and interference.”303

    undefinedundefined

    In May 2021, a Russia-based hacking group known as DarkSide launched a cyberattack against Colonial Pipeline, “the operator of one of the nation’s largest fuel pipelines.”304

    undefinedundefined
    The 5,500-mile pipeline, “responsible for carrying fuel from refineries along the Gulf Coast to New Jersey,” was down for six days.305
    undefinedundefined
    Colonial Pipeline paid DarkSide $90 million in bitcoin as a ransom payment,306
    undefinedundefined
    but the Department of Justice was able to recover approximately $2.3 million of that amount a few weeks later.307
    undefinedundefined
    In June 2021, REvil, a Russian cybercriminal group, launched a ransomware attack on JBS, “the world’s largest meat processing company.”308
    undefinedundefined
    As a result of the cyberattack, JBS was forced to shut down all nine of its U.S. plants for a brief period.309
    undefinedundefined

    However, the United States is not Russia’s only target. In February 2020, the U.S. and its key allies accused Russia’s main military intelligence agency, the GRU, of a broad cyberattack against the Republic of Georgia. According to The New York Times, the attack “took out websites and interrupted television broadcasts.”310

    undefinedundefined

    The attack was limited, but through its accusation, the U.S. sought to deter Moscow from intervening in the 2020 presidential election.

    In April 2018 alone, Germany’s head of domestic intelligence accused Moscow of attacking his government’s computer networks, and the U.K.’s National Cyber Security Center warned that Russian hackers were targeting Britain’s critical infrastructure supply chains. Cyber activity continues to be a significant part of Russia’s efforts to manipulate and undermine democratic elections in Europe and elsewhere.

    In addition to official intelligence and military cyber assets, Russia employs allied criminal organizations (so-called patriotic hackers) to help it engage in cyber aggression. Using these hackers gives Russia greater resources and can help to shield its true capabilities. Patriotic hackers also give the Russian government deniability when it is desired. In June 2017, for example, Putin stated that “[i]f they (hackers) are patriotically-minded, they start to make their own contribution to what they believe is the good fight against those who speak badly about Russia. Is that possible? Theoretically it is possible.”311

    undefinedundefined

    Russia’s cyber capabilities are advanced and of key importance in realizing the state’s strategic aims. Russia has used cyberattacks to further the reach and effectiveness of its propaganda and disinformation campaigns, and its ongoing cyberattacks against election processes in the U.S. and European countries are designed to undermine citizens’ belief in the veracity of electoral outcomes and erode support for democratic institutions in the longer term. Russia also has used cyberattacks to target physical infrastructure, including electrical grids, air traffic control, and gas distribution systems.

    Russia’s increasingly bold use of cyber capabilities, coupled with their sophistication and Moscow’s willingness to use them aggressively, presents a serious challenge both to the U.S. and to its interests abroad.

    Conclusion

    Overall, the threat to the U.S. homeland originating from Europe remains low, but the threat to America’s interests and allies in the region remains significant. Behind this threat lies Russia. Although Russia has the military capability to harm and (in the case of its nuclear arsenal) to pose an existential threat to the U.S., it has not conclusively demonstrated the intent to do so.

    The situation with respect to America’s allies in the region is different. Through NATO, the U.S. is obliged by treaty to come to the aid of the alliance’s European members. Russia continues its efforts to undermine the NATO alliance and presents an existential threat to U.S. allies in Eastern Europe. NATO has been the cornerstone of European security and stability ever since its creation in 1949, and it is in America’s interest to ensure that it maintains both the military capability and the political will to fulfill its treaty obligations.

    While Russia is not the threat to U.S. global interests that the Soviet Union was during the Cold War, it does pose challenges to a range of America’s interests and those of its allies and friends closest to Russia’s borders. Russia possesses a full range of capabilities from ground forces to air, naval, space, and cyber. It still maintains the world’s largest nuclear arsenal, and although a strike on the U.S. is highly unlikely, the latent potential for such a strike still gives these weapons enough strategic value vis-à-vis America’s NATO allies and interests in Europe to ensure their continued relevance.

    Russian provocations that are much less serious than any scenario involving a nuclear exchange pose the most serious challenge to American interests, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe, the Arctic, the Balkans, and the South Caucasus. As the 2021 Worldwide Threat Assessment states:

    Moscow will continue to employ a variety of tactics this year meant to undermine US influence, develop new international norms and partnerships, divide Western countries and weaken Western alliances, and demonstrate Russia’s ability to shape global events as a major player in a new multipolar international order. Russia will continue to develop its military, nuclear, space, cyber, and intelligence capabilities, while actively engaging abroad and leveraging its energy resources, to advance its agenda and undermine the United States.312
    undefinedundefined

    For these reasons, the Index of U.S. Military Strength continues to assess the threat from Russia as “aggressive” and “formidable.”

    2022_IndexOfUSMilitaryStrength_ASSESSMENTS_Threats_RUSSIA.gif

    Endnotes

    1. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2021: The Annual Assessment of Global Military Capabilities and Defence Economics (London: Routledge, 2021), pp. 164–217.
    2. Michael Birnbaum, “Russian Submarines Are Prowling Around Vital Undersea Cables. It’s Making NATO Nervous,” The Washington Post, December 22, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russian-submarines-are-prowling-around-vital-undersea-cables-its-making-nato-nervous/2017/12/22/d4c1f3da-e5d0-11e7-927a-e72eac1e73b6_story.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    3. Paul Stronski, “Implausible Deniability: Russia’s Private Military Companies,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Commentary, June 2, 2020, https://carnegieendowment.org/2020/06/02/implausible-deniability-russia-s-private-military-companies-pub-81954 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    4. Kimberly Marten, “The Puzzle of Russian Behavior in Deir al-Zour,” War on the Rocks, July 5, 2018, https://warontherocks.com/2018/07/the-puzzle-of-russian-behavior-in-deir-al-zour/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    5. Thomas Gibbons-Neff, “How a 4-Hour Battle Between Russian Mercenaries and U.S. Commandos Unfolded in Syria,” The New York Times, May 24, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/24/world/middleeast/american-commandos-russian-mercenaries-syria.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    6. Maria Tsvetkova, “Russian Toll in Syria Battle Was 300 Killed and Wounded: Sources,” Reuters, February 15, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-russia-casualtie/russian-toll-in-syria-battle-was-300-killed-and-wounded-sources-idUSKCN1FZ2DZ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    7. Luke Harding, “Lawsuit Targets Russian Mercenary Company over Role in Syria,” The Guardian, March 15, 2021, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/15/lawsuit-seeks-justice-for-suspected-russian-killing-of-syrian-detainee (accessed June 19, 2021).
    8. Maria Tsvetkova and Anton Zverev, “Exclusive: Kremlin-Linked Contractors Help Guard Venezuela’s Maduro—Sources,” Reuters, January 25, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-politics-russia-exclusive/exclusive-kremlin-linked-contractors-help-guard-venezuelas-maduro-sources-idUSKCN1PJ22M (accessed June 19, 2021).
    9. Tom Balmforth, “Russia Sends Lavrov to Venezuela to ‘Counteract’ U.S. Sanctions,” Reuters, February 4, 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-venezuela-lavrov/russia-sends-lavrov-to-venezuela-to-counteract-u-s-sanctions-idUSKBN1ZY19Q (accessed June 19, 2021).
    10. Reuters, “Russian Air Force Planes Land in Venezuela Carrying Troops: Reports,” March 24, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-politics-idUSKCN1R50NB (accessed June 19, 2021).
    11. Andrew Osborn, “Russian Nuclear-Capable Bomber Aircraft Fly to Venezuela, Angering U.S.,” Reuters, December 11, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-venezuela-russia-airforce/russian-nuclear-capable-bomber-aircraft-fly-to-venezuela-angering-u-s-idUSKBN1OA23L (accessed June 19, 2021).
    12. Daria Litvinova, “Russia in Venezuela: As Moscow Accuses U.S. of ‘Information War,’ What Is Putin’s Role in the Standoff?” CBS News, updated May 1, 2019, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-in-venezuela-why-vladimir-putin-backs-nicolas-maduro-in-standoff-with-donald-trump-us/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    13. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017: The Annual Assessment of Global Military Capabilities and Defence Economics (London: Routledge, 2017), p. 186.
    14. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “Putin Creates National Guard Force,” July 4, 2016, https://www.rferl.org/a/putin-national-guard-dissent-riots/27836301.html (accessed June 19, 2021), and International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 169.
    15. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 186.
    16. Warsaw Institute, Russia Monitor, “Russia’s Rosgvardia Sets Foot in Belarus,” December 22, 2020, https://warsawinstitute.org/russias-rosgvardia-sets-foot-belarus/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    17. Press release, “Russia’s Economy Loses Momentum amid COVID-19 Resurgence, Says New World Bank Report,” The World Bank, December 16, 2020, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2020/12/16/russias-economy-loses-momentum-amid-covid-19-resurgence-says-new-world-bank-report (accessed June 19, 2021).
    18. Anna Andrianova, “Russian Economy Rebounding from Covid Slump After Lockdown,” Bloomberg, updated April 2, 2021, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-04-01/russian-economy-continues-climb-from-covid-slump-after-lockdown (accessed June 19, 2021).
    19. Table 1, “The 40 Countries with the Highest Military Expenditure in 2020,” in Diego Lopes Da Silva, Nan Tian, and Alexandra Marksteiner, “Trends in World Military Expenditure, 2020,” Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Fact Sheet, April 2021, p. 2, https://sipri.org/sites/default/files/2021-04/fs_2104_milex_0.pdf (accessed June 19, 2021).
    20. Andrew S. Bowen, “Russian Armed Forces: Military Modernization and Reforms,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. 11603, July 20, 2020, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11603 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    21. Siemon T. Wezeman, “Russia’s Military Spending: Frequently Asked Questions,” Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Backgrounder, April 27, 2020, https://www.sipri.org/commentary/topical-backgrounder/2020/russias-military-spending-frequently-asked-questions (accessed June 19, 2021).
    22. Table 5, “Russian Defence Expenditure as % of GDP,” in International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2021, p. 174.
    23. Richard Connolly and Mathieu Boulègue, “Russia’s New State Armament Programme: Implications for the Russian Armed Forces and Military Capabilities to 2027,” Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs Research Paper, May 2018, p. 2, https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2018-05-10-russia-state-armament-programme-connolly-boulegue-final.pdf (accessed June 24, 2021).
    24. Hans M. Kristensen and Matt Korda, “Russian Nuclear Weapons, 2021,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 77, No. 2 (March 2021), p. 94, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00963402.2021.1885869?needAccess=true (accessed June 19, 2021).
    25. Maxim Starchak, “Year 2020 in Review: Results of Russia’s Nuclear Weapons Modernization,” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 18, Issue 7 (January 13, 2021), https://jamestown.org/program/year-2020-in-review-results-of-russias-nuclear-weapons-modernization/ (accessed June 19, 2021), and Franz-Stefan Gady, “Russia’s Most Powerful Intercontinental Ballistic Missile to Enter Service in 2021,” The Diplomat, March 30, 2018, https://thediplomat.com/2018/03/russias-most-powerful-intercontinental-ballistic-missile-to-enter-service-in-2021/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    26. “Russia’s Hypersonic Ballistic Missile and Laser System in Final Tests, Putin Says,” The Moscow Times, April 11, 2019, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/04/11/russias-hypersonic-ballistic-missile-laser-system-final-tests-putin-says-a65204 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    27. Starchak, “Year 2020 in Review: Results of Russia’s Nuclear Weapons Modernization.”
    28. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 159.
    29. Tom Bowman, “U.S. Military Advantage over Russia and China ‘Eroding,’ Pentagon Says,” NPR, January 19, 2018, https://www.npr.org/2018/01/19/579088536/u-s-military-advantage-over-russia-and-china-eroding-says-pentagon (accessed June 19, 2021).
    30. Kyle Mizokami, “Russia Is Field Testing Its New Armata Tank in Syria,” Popular Mechanics, April 22, 2020, https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a32228809/russia-armata-tank/ (accessed June 24, 2021).
    31. “Russia to Receive Advanced Armata Tanks in 2022,” The Moscow Times, March 4, 2021, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/03/04/russia-to-receive-advanced-armata-tanks-in-2022-a73149 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    32. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2021, p. 170.
    33. Alex Lockie, “Russia Admits Defeat on Its ‘Stealth’ F-35 Killer by Canceling Mass Production of the Su-57 Fighter Jet,” Business Insider, July 12, 2018, https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-admits-defeat-su-57-not-going-into-mass-production-2018-7 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    34. “Russian Fighter Jet Crashes Near Crimea, Pilot Missing,” The Moscow Times, March 26, 2020, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2020/03/26/russian-fighter-jet-crashes-near-crimea-pilot-missing-a69753 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    35. Ryan Pickrell, “Russia Is Talking About Scrapping Its Only Aircraft Carrier, Putting the Troubled Ship out of Its Misery,” Business Insider, April 8, 2019, https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-is-talking-about-scrapping-kuznetsov-its-only-aircraft-carrier-2019-4 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    36. Zahra Ullah, Darya Tarasova, and Brad Lendon, “Russia’s Only Aircraft Carrier Catches Fire; 1 Dead and 2 Missing,” CNN, updated December 12, 2019, https://www.cnn.com/2019/12/12/europe/russian-carrier-fire-intl/index.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    37. Benjamin Brimelow, “Russia’s Unlucky Aircraft Carrier Is Getting Ready for Its Return to Action,” Business Insider, April 19, 2021, https://www.businessinsider.com/russian-aircraft-carrier-kuznetsov-getting-ready-for-return-to-action-2021-4 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    38. Ryan Pickrell, “Russia Is Planning to Build Its First Nuclear-Powered Aircraft Carrier After Breaking Its Only Flattop,” Business Insider, May 8, 2019, https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-wants-to-build-its-first-nuclear-powered-aircraft-carrier-2019-5 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    39. Franz-Stefan Gady, “Russia Lays Down 2 Project 22350 Admiral Gorshkov-Class Stealth Frigates,” The Diplomat, April 24, 2019, https://thediplomat.com/2019/04/russia-lays-down-2-project-22350-admiral-gorshkov-class-stealth-frigates/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    40. Ibid. and Xavier Vavasseur, “Project 22350 Gorshkov-Class Frigates to Join Russia’s Black Sea Fleet,” Naval News, April 2, 2020, https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/04/project-22350-gorshkov-class-frigates-to-join-russias-black-sea-fleet/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    41. Thomas Nilsen, “Russian Navy Gets Go-ahead for Design of New Nuclear Powered Destroyers,” The Barents Observer, August 28, 2017, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2017/08/russian-navy-gets-go-ahead-design-new-nuclear-powered-destroyers (accessed June 19, 2021).
    42. Joseph Trevithick, “Russia Has Abandoned Its Massive Nuclear Destroyer and Supersized Frigate Programs,” The War Zone, April 21, 2020, https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/33099/russia-has-abandoned-its-massive-nuclear-destroyer-and-supersized-frigate-programs (accessed June 19, 2021).
    43. Snehesh Alex Philip, “India Gets Ukrainian Engines for Its Stealth Frigates, Sends Them to Shipbuilder in Russia,” The Print, January 19, 2021, https://theprint.in/defence/india-gets-ukrainian-engines-for-its-stealth-frigates-sends-them-to-shipbuilder-in-russia/587923/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    44. Andrew Osborn, “Despite Putin’s Swagger, Russia Struggles to Modernize Its Navy,” Reuters, February 21, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-military-insight/despite-putins-swagger-russia-struggles-to-modernize-its-navy-idUSKCN1QA0U7 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    45. Philip, “India Gets Ukrainian Engines for Its Stealth Frigates, Sends Them to Shipbuilder in Russia.”
    46. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2021, pp. 164 and 171.
    47. Sputnik, “Russia Could Go Beyond Planned Series of 10 Borei-Class Nuclear-Powered Subs, Government Says,” May 17, 2021, https://sputniknews.com/military/202105171082913306-russia-could-go-beyond-planned-series-of-10-borei-class-nuclear-powered-subs-government-says/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    48. Dave Makichuk, “Russia’s Kalibr Missile Puts US on the Back-Heel,” Asia Times, March 12, 2021, https://asiatimes.com/2021/03/russias-kalibr-missile-puts-us-on-the-back-heel/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    49. TASS, “Russian Naval Ship Test-Fires Kalibr Cruise Missile from Arctic Sea,” August 31, 2021, https://tass.com/defense/1332025 (accessed September 1, 2021).
    50. Charlie Gao, “Russia’s Husky Class Submarine: Armed with Nuclear Torpedoes and Hypersonic Missiles?” The National Interest, The Buzz Blog, May 10, 2018, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russias-husky-class-submarine-armed-nuclear-torpedoes-25784 (accessed June 19, 2021), and Michael Peck, “Russia Wants to Arm Its New Husky-Class Submarines with Hypersonic Missiles,” The National Interest, The Buzz Blog, May 31, 2018, http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/russia-wants-arm-its-new-husky-class-submarines-hypersonic-26063 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    51. Gao, “Russia’s Husky Class Submarine: Armed with Nuclear Torpedoes and Hypersonic Missiles?”
    52. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 174.
    53. Franz Stefan-Gady, “First Project 636.3 Kilo-Class Attack Sub to Enter Service with Russia’s Pacific Fleet This Month,” The Diplomat, November 22, 2019, https://thediplomat.com/2019/11/first-project-636-3-kilo-class-attack-sub-to-enter-service-with-russias-pacific-fleet-this-month/ (accessed June 19, 2021), and International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2021, p. 171.
    54. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 174.
    55. Ben Connable, Abby Doll, Alyssa Demus, Dara Massicot, Clint Reach, Anthony Atler, William Mackenzie, Matthew Povlock, and Lauren Skrabala, Russia’s Limit of Advance: Analysis of Russian Ground Force Deployment Capabilities and Limitations, RAND Corporation, 2020, pp. xvii and 56, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2563.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    56. Andrew Osborn, “Russia Expands Military Transport Fleet to Move Troops Long Distances,” Reuters, March 7, 2017, http://www.reuters.com/article/russia-navy-expansion-idUSL5N1GK470 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    57. Roger McDermott, “Moscow Weighs Options to Procure S-500 Air-Defense Systems,” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 18, Issue 48 (March 24, 2021), https://jamestown.org/program/moscow-weighs-options-to-procure-s-500-air-defense-systems/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    58. U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency, Challenges to Security in Space, released February 11, 2019, p. 23, https://www.dia.mil/Portals/27/Documents/News/Military%20Power%20Publications/Space_Threat_V14_020119_sm.pdf (accessed June 4, 2021). For release date, see news release, “Defense Intelligence Agency Releases Report on Challenges to U.S. Security in Space,” Defense Intelligence Agency, February 11, 2019, https://www.dia.mil/news/articles/article-view/article/1754150/defense-intelligence-agency-releases-report-on-challenges-to-us-security-in-spa/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    59. Sandra Erwin, “Space Force Official: Russian Missile Tests Expose Vulnerability of Low-Orbiting Satellites,” SpaceNews, December 16, 2020, https://spacenews.com/space-force-official-russian-missile-tests-expose-vulnerability-of-low-orbiting-satellites/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    60. TASS, “Latest Voronezh Radars to Replace All Russian Existing Airspace Control Systems,” February 15, 2021, https://tass.com/defense/1256441 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    61. General Tod D. Wolters, United States Air Force, Commander, United States European Command, statement on EUCOM posture before the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate, February 25, 2020, p. 3, https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Wolters_02-25-20.pdf (accessed June 19, 2021). Emphasis in original.
    62. Olevs Nikers, “Russia’s Offshore ‘Missile Tests’: Psychologically Undermining the Economic Security of the Baltics,” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 15, Issue 74 (May 15, 2018), https://jamestown.org/program/russias-offshore-missile-tests-psychologically-undermining-the-economic-security-of-the-baltics/ (accessed June 19, 2021), and Michael Birnbaum, “Russia Tests Missiles in the Baltic Sea, a Day After Baltic Leaders Met with Trump,” The Washington Post, April 4, 2018, https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russia-tests-missiles-in-the-baltic-sea-a-day-after-baltic-leaders-met-with-trump/2018/04/04/0a35e222-380d-11e8-af3c-2123715f78df_story.html?utm_term=.8f8c10f97f62 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    63. Samuel Osborne, “Russian Live Missile Tests Force Latvia to Close Airspace over Baltic Sea: ‘It’s Hard to Comprehend,’” The Independent, April 5, 2018, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-latvia-missile-tests-baltic-sea-airspace-donald-trump-baltic-leaders-white-house-a8289451.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    64. Nikers, “Russia’s Offshore ‘Missile Tests’: Psychologically Undermining the Economic Security of the Baltics,” and Birnbaum, “Russia Tests Missiles in the Baltic Sea, a Day After Baltic Leaders Met with Trump.”
    65. Osborne, “Russian Live Missile Tests Force Latvia to Close Airspace over Baltic Sea: ‘It’s Hard to Comprehend.’”
    66. Col. Tomasz K. Kowalik and Dominik P. Jankowski, “The Dangerous Tool of Russian Military Exercises,” Foreign Policy Association, Foreign Policy Blogs, June 7, 2017, https://foreignpolicyblogs.com/2017/06/07/dangerous-tool-russian-military-exercises/ (accessed June 19, 2021). Article “originally published by [the] Center for European Policy Analysis.”
    67. Nike Ching, “Blinken Heads to Ukraine After Russia Sends 150K Troops to Border,” Voice of America, April 30, 2021, https://www.voanews.com/europe/blinken-heads-ukraine-after-russia-sends-150k-troops-border (accessed June 19, 2021), and Vladimir Isachenkov, “Russian Military Says Its Troops Back to Bases After Buildup,” Associated Press, April 29, 2021, https://apnews.com/article/world-news-moscow-ukraine-europe-russia-629232949b5253512a58ca6fef215af9 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    68. Dave Johnson, “VOSTOK 2018: Ten Years of Russian Strategic Exercises and Warfare Preparation,” NATO Review, December 20, 2018, https://www.nato.int/docu/review/2018/Also-in-2018/vostok-2018-ten-years-of-russian-strategic-exercises-and-warfare-preparation-military-exercices/EN/index.htm (accessed June 19, 2021).
    69. U.S. Strategic Command, “Remarks by Gen. Curtis M. Scaparrotti at the 2016 Deterrence Symposium,” La Vista, Nebraska, July 27, 2016, http://www.stratcom.mil/Media/Speeches/Article/986470/2016-deterrence-symposium/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    70. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 187.
    71. Andrew Higgins, “300,000 Troops and 900 Tanks: Russia’s Biggest Military Drills Since Cold War,” The New York Times, August 28, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/28/world/europe/russia-military-drills.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    72. Ibid. and Johnson, “VOSTOK 2018: Ten Years of Russian Strategic Exercises and Warfare Preparation.”
    73. Mathieu Boulègue, “Russia’s Vostok Exercises Were Both Serious Planning and a Show,” Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, September 17, 2018, https://www.chathamhouse.org/expert/comment/russia-s-vostok-exercises-were-both-serious-planning-and-show (accessed June 19, 2021). Also posted on IntelliBriefs, September 18, 2018, http://intellibriefs.blogspot.com/2018/09/russias-vostok-exercises-were-both.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    74. Ibid. and Johnson, “VOSTOK 2018: Ten Years of Russian Strategic Exercises and Warfare Preparation.”
    75. Higgins, “300,000 Troops and 900 Tanks: Russia’s Biggest Military Drills Since Cold War,” and Sam LaGrone, “China Sent Uninvited Spy Ship to Russian Vostok 2018 Exercise Alongside Troops, Tanks,” U.S. Naval Institute News, September 17, 2018, https://news.usni.org/2018/09/17/china-sent-uninvited-spy-ship-russian-vostok-2018-exercise-alongside-troops-tanks (accessed June 19, 2021).
    76. Vladimir Putin, “On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation,” Decree of the President of the Russian Federation No. 400, Moscow, July 2, 2021, pp. 11–12, https://www.academia.edu/49526773/National_Security_Strategy_of_the_Russian_Federation_2021 (accessed July 20, 2021).
    77. Ibid., p. 12.
    78. Connolly and Boulègue, “Russia’s New State Armament Programme: Implications for the Russian Armed Forces and Military Capabilities to 2027,” p. 16.
    79. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 15.
    80. Kristensen and Korda, “Russian Nuclear Weapons, 2021,” p. 90.
    81. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 15.
    82. Tom O’Connor, “Russia Conflict with NATO and U.S. Would Immediately Result in Nuclear War, Russian Lawmaker Warns,” Newsweek, May 30, 2017, http://www.newsweek.com/russia-politician-nuclear-weapons-us-nato-crimea-617613 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    83. Wolters, statement on EUCOM posture, p. 3.
    84. Barry D. Watts, Nuclear–Conventional Firebreaks and the Nuclear Taboo, Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2013, p. 43, https://csbaonline.org/uploads/documents/Nuclear-Conventional-Firebreaks-Report1.pdf (accessed June 19, 2021).
    85. Shaun Waterman, “Russia Threatens to Strike NATO Missile Defense Sites,” The Washington Times, May 3, 2012, http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/may/3/russia-threatens-strike-nato-missile-defense-sites/?page=all (accessed June 19, 2021), and David Reid, “Russia Threatens Military Response to Any NATO Action over Nuclear-Ready Missile,” CNBC, June 26, 2019, https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/26/russia-threatens-response-to-nato-over-nuclear-ready-ssc-8-missile.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    86. Patrick Tucker, “US Missile Defenses Are About to Level up,” Defense One, August 4, 2020, https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2020/08/us-missile-defenses-are-about-level/167462/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    87. Michael R. Gordon, “U.S. Says Russia Tested Missile, Despite Treaty,” The New York Times, January 29, 2014, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/30/world/europe/us-says-russia-tested-missile-despite-treaty.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    88. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “Report: Russia Has Deployed More Medium-Range Cruise Missiles than Previously Thought,” February 10, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/report-russia-has-deployed-more-medium-range-cruise-missiles-than-previously-thought/29761868.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    89. Michael R. Gordon, “Russia Deploys Missile, Violating Treaty and Challenging Trump,” The New York Times, February 14, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/14/world/europe/russia-cruise-missile-arms-control-treaty.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    90. Jim Garamone, “NATO Agrees: Russia in Material Breach of INF Treaty,” U.S. Department of Defense, December 5, 2018, https://dod.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1705843/nato-agrees-russia-in-material-breach-of-inf-treaty/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    91. Fact Sheet, “President Donald J. Trump to Withdraw the United States from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty,” The White House, February 1, 2019, https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-withdraw-united-states-intermediate-range-nuclear-forces-inf-treaty/ (accessed June 29, 2021), and press statement by Michael R. Pompeo, U.S. Secretary of State, “U.S. Withdrawal from the INF Treaty on August 2, 2019,” U.S. Embassy and Consulates in Russia, August 2, 2019, https://ru.usembassy.gov/u-s-withdrawal-from-the-inf-treaty-on-august-2-2019/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    92. News release, “Russian Banker Sentenced in Connection with Conspiracy to Work for Russian Intelligence,” U.S. Department of Justice, May 25, 2016, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/russian-banker-sentenced-connection-conspiracy-work-russian-intelligence (accessed June 20, 2021).
    93. Sara Murray, Sam Fossum, and Lindsay Benson, “Maria Butina Released from Federal Prison, Deported to Russia,” CNN, updated October 25, 2019, https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/25/politics/maria-butina-released/index.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    94. Deutsche Welle, “Hundreds of Russian and Chinese Spies in Brussels—Report,” February 9, 2019, https://www.dw.com/en/hundreds-of-russian-and-chinese-spies-in-brussels-report/a-47437958 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    95. Warren Strobel and John Walcott, “Fewer Russian Spies in U.S. but Getting Harder to Track,” Reuters, March 28, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-russia-spies/fewer-russian-spies-in-u-s-but-getting-harder-to-track-idUSKBN1H40JW (accessed June 19, 2021).
    96. BBC News, “Sergei Skripal: Who Is the Former Russian Intelligence Officer?” March 29, 2018, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-43291394 (accessed June 20, 2021); Martin Evans and Victoria Ward, “Salisbury Nerve Agent Backlash: Residents Outraged as 500 Told They May Be at Risk a Week After Spy Attack,” The Telegraph, March 12, 2018, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/03/11/salisbury-public-warned-wash-clothes-nerve-agent-attack/ (accessed June 20, 2021); and Ella Wills, “Police Officer Discharged from Hospital After Salisbury Spy Poisoning Speaks Out: ‘Life Will Probably Never Be the Same,’” Evening Standard, March 22, 2018, https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/police-officer-discharged-from-hospital-after-salisbury-spy-poisoning-speaks-out-for-first-time-life-a3797041.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    97. Lauren Said-Moorhouse and Samuel Quashie-Idun, “Salisbury Declared Novichok-Free Nearly a Year After Nerve Agent Attack,” CNN, March 1, 2019, https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/01/uk/salisbury-novichok-cleanup-gbr-intl/index.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    98. News release, “Statement from the United States, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom on the Attack in Salisbury,” The White House, March 15, 2018, https://ni.usembassy.gov/statement-united-states-france-germany-united-kingdom-attack-salisbury/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    99. Heidi Blake, Tom Warren, Richard Holmes, Jason Leopold, Jane Bradley, and Alex Campbell, “From Russia with Blood: The Kremlin’s Ruthless Assassination Program and Vladimir Putin’s Secret War on the West,” BuzzFeed News, June 15, 2017 (including June 16, 2017, update), https://www.buzzfeed.com/heidiblake/from-russia-with-blood-14-suspected-hits-on-british-soil?utm_term=.dtzm1n1mZB#.po1WlrlWp0 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    100. Ali Watkins, “Russia Escalates Spy Games After Years of U.S. Neglect,” Politico, June 1, 2017, http://www.politico.com/story/2017/06/01/russia-spies-espionage-trump-239003 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    101. BBC News, “US Charges Russian Spies over Yahoo Breach,” March 15, 2017, http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-39281063 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    102. Katie Bo Williams, “US Sanctions Russia over Hacking, Expels 35 Officials,” The Hill, December 29, 2016, http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/312119-us-announces-sanctions-on-russia (accessed June 20, 2021).
    103. Nadia Schadlow and Brayden Helwig, “Protecting Undersea Cables Must be Made a National Security Priority,” Defense News, July 1, 2020, https://www.defensenews.com/opinion/commentary/2020/07/01/protecting-undersea-cables-must-be-made-a-national-security-priority/ (accessed June 20, 2021), and Marcia Wendorf, “Both the U.S. and Russia Are Stalking the World’s Undersea Cables,” Interesting Engineering, August 16, 2019, https://interestingengineering.com/both-the-us-and-russia-are-stalking-the-worlds-undersea-cables (accessed June 28, 2021).
    104. Cristina Silva, “New Cold War: Is Russia Spying on the U.S. from a Nicaragua Military Compound?” Newsweek, May 22, 2017, http://www.newsweek.com/new-cold-war-russia-spying-us-nicaragua-military-compound-613427 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    105. Evan Ellis, “Russian Engagement in Latin America: An Update,” Center for Strategic and International Studies Commentary, December 19, 2017, https://www.csis.org/analysis/russian-engagement-latin-america-update (accessed June 20, 2021).
    106. Ivan Ulises Klyszcz, “Russia’s Central American Engagements,” Foreign Policy Research Institute Russia Foreign Policy Paper, October 2019, p. 18, https://www.fpri.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/rfp1klyszcz.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    107. Brett Forrest, “In Cold War Echo, Russia Returns to U.S.’s Backyard,” The Wall Street Journal, January 31, 2018, https://www.wsj.com/articles/russia-returns-to-u-s-s-backyard-1517403600 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    108. Estonian Foreign Intelligence Service, International Security and Estonia 2019, p. 4, https://www.valisluureamet.ee/pdf/raport-2019-ENG-web.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    109. State Security Department of the Republic of Lithuania and Defence Intelligence and Security Service Under the Ministry of National Defence, National Threat Assessment 2021, p. 6, https://www.vsd.lt/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/2021-EN-el_.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    110. State Security Department of the Republic of Lithuania and Second Investigation Department Under the Ministry of National Defence, National Threat Assessment 2019, p. 6, https://www.vsd.lt/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2019-Gresmes-internetui-EN.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    111. Latvian State Security Service, Annual Report for 2018, April 2019, pp. 18–24, https://vdd.gov.lv/en/useful/publications/annual-report-on-the-activities-of-latvian-state-security-service-in-2018.art139 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    112. Per Olaf Salming, “Kremlin Intimidation: Putin Renames Air Force Regiment ‘Tallinn Regiment,’” UpNorth, January 30, 2018, https://upnorth.eu/kremlin-intimidation-putin-renames-air-force-regiment-tallinn-regiment/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    113. Bill Gertz, “Russia Waging Information Warfare, General Says,” The Washington Free Beacon, March 24, 2017, http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-waging-information-warfare-general-says/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    114. Alexis Mrachek, “Don’t Believe Russia’s Disinformation About Coronavirus,” The Daily Signal, April 7, 2020, https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/04/07/dont-believe-russias-disinformation-about-coronavirus/.
    115. Baltic News Service/TBT Staff, “Fake News About US Troops Posted on BNS Website and Cyber Attack Suspected,” The Baltic Times, April 13, 2017, http://www.baltictimes.com/fake_news_about_us_troops_posted_on_bns_website_and_cyber_attack_suspected/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    116. BBC News, “Hackers Post Fake Stories on Real News Sites ‘to Discredit NATO,’” July 30, 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-53594440 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    117. Bill Gertz, “Russia Steps up Anti-U.S. Military Propaganda,” The Washington Free Beacon, April 27, 2017, http://freebeacon.com/national-security/russia-steps-anti-u-s-military-propaganda/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    118. John Vandiver, “Poland Hit by Wave of Fake News Before Start of Major Military Exercise with US,” Stars and Stripes, May 29, 2020, https://www.stripes.com/news/europe/poland-hit-by-wave-of-fake-news-before-start-of-major-military-exercise-with-us-1.631647 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    119. Kalev Stoicescu and Pauli Järvenpää, Contemporary Deterrence: Insights and Lessons from Enhanced Forward Presence, International Centre for Defense and Security, January 2019, p. 13, https://icds.ee/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/ICDS_Report_Contemporary_Deterrence_Stoicescu_J%C3%A4rvenp%C3%A4%C3%A4_January_2019.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    120. Atlantic Council, Digital Forensic Research Lab, “#BalticBrief: The Kremlin’s Loudspeaker in Latvia,” November 18, 2018, https://medium.com/dfrlab/balticbrief-the-kremlins-loudspeaker-in-latvia-14c6398b2473 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    121. Kathrin Hille, Neil Buckley, Courtney Weaver, and Guy Chazan, “Vladimir Putin Signs Treaty to Annex Crimea,” Financial Times, March 18, 2014, http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d93e4c7c-ae6d-11e3-8e41-00144feab7de.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    122. Janusz Bugajski and Peter B. Doran, “Black Sea Rising: Russia’s Strategy in Southeast Europe,” Center for European Policy Analysis Black Sea Strategic Report No. 1, February 2016, p. 8, https://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/644196_29f8496cc1934185865b81480c4561b5.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    123. Neil MacFarquhar, “Putin Opens Bridge to Crimea, Cementing Russia’s Hold on Neighbor,” The New York Times, May 15, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/15/world/europe/putin-russia-crimea-bridge.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    124. UNIAN Information Agency, “Shipping Volumes at Mariupol Port Fall 10% Against 2017—Media,” January 9, 2019, https://www.unian.info/economics/10402497-shipping-volumes-at-mariupol-port-fall-10-against-2017-media.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    125. Ann M. Simmons, “New Rail Bridge to Crimea Strengthens Russia’s Hand Against Ukraine,” The Wall Street Journal, updated December 26, 2019, https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-rail-bridge-to-crimea-strengthens-russias-hand-against-ukraine-11577379297 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    126. “Deployment: Ukraine,” in International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance2021, p. 205. Ukraine has put the number of Russian troops in occupied Crimea at more than 31,000; however, with Russia’s military buildup in April 2021, the number could now be closer to 40,000. Ukrinform, “Already 31,500 Russian Troops Deployed in Occupied Crimea,” November 7, 2019, https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-polytics/2813512-already-31500-russian-troops-deployed-in-occupied-crimea.html (accessed June 20, 2021), and Dan DeLuce, “Steady Increase in Russian Troops in Crimea on Ukraine Border, Pentagon Says,” NBC News, updated April 20, 2021, https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/steady-increase-russian-troops-crimea-ukraine-border-says-pentagon-n1264546 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    127. Michael Petersen, “The Naval Power Shift in the Black Sea,” War on the Rocks, January 9, 2019, https://warontherocks.com/2019/01/the-naval-power-shift-in-the-black-sea/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    128. Dmitry Gorenburg, “Is a New Russian Black Sea Fleet Coming? Or Is It Here?” War on the Rocks, July 31, 2018, https://warontherocks.com/2018/07/is-a-new-russian-black-sea-fleet-coming-or-is-it-here/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    129. UNIAN Information Agency, “U.S. Experts Show Russian Military Equipment Transferred to Crimea amid Recent Build-up,” May 6, 2021, https://www.unian.info/world/russian-aggression-u-s-experts-show-russian-military-equipment-transferred-to-crimea-amid-recent-buildup-11411557.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    130. Reuters, “Russia Decides to Deploy Nuclear-Capable Strategic Bombers to Crimea: RIA,” March 18, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-crimea-bombers-idUSKCN1QZ1WV (accessed June 20, 2021).
    131. Bugajski and Doran, “Black Sea Rising: Russia’s Strategy in Southeast Europe,” p. 3.
    132. Gorenburg, “Is a New Russian Black Sea Fleet Coming? Or Is It Here?”
    133. Vavasseur, “Project 22350 Gorshkov-Class Frigates to Join Russia’s Black Sea Fleet.”
    134. “Russia: SSGN Severodvinsk to Get Caliber Cruise Missiles,” Naval Today, August 16, 2012, http://navaltoday.com/2012/08/16/russia-ssgn-severodvinsk-to-get-caliber-cruise-missiles/ (accessed June 20, 2020), and Sam Jones and Kathrin Hille, “Russia’s Military Ambitions Make Waves in the Black Sea,” Financial Times, May 13, 2016, https://next.ft.com/content/1b9c24d8-1819-11e6-b197-a4af20d5575e (accessed June 20, 2021).
    135. Petersen, “The Naval Power Shift in the Black Sea.”
    136. Mark Episkopos, “Russia’s New S-350 Air Defense System Could See Combat in Crimea and Syria,” The National Interest, The Reboot Blog, August 15, 2020, https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/russias-new-s-350-air-defense-system-could-see-combat-crimea-and-syria-166969 (accessed June 26, 2021).
    137. Sergey Sukhankin, “Russia Pours More Military Hardware into ‘Fortress Crimea,’” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 14, Issue 147 (November 14, 2017), https://jamestown.org/program/russia-pours-military-hardware-fortress-crimea/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    138. Petersen, “The Naval Power Shift in the Black Sea.”
    139. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance2021, p. 205.
    140. Meetings Coverage and Press Releases, “Situation in Eastern Ukraine Remains ‘Tense and Volatile’ Despite Post-Ceasefire Reduction in Fighting, Security Council Told During Briefing,” U.N. Security Council, December 11, 2015, https://www.un.org/press/en/2015/sc12154.doc.htm (accessed June 20, 2021).
    141. Reuters, “Two Ukrainian Soldiers Killed in Eastern Ukraine: Military,” April 6, 2021, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-crisis-casualties/two-ukrainian-soldiers-killed-in-eastern-ukraine-military-idUSKBN2BT0KV (accessed June 20, 2021).
    142. Crimea.Realities, “Russian Court Leaves Jailed Ukrainian Sailors in Pretrial Detention,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, January 15, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/russian-court-leaves-jailed-ukrainian-sailors-in-pretrial-detention/29711363.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    143. Ivan Nechepurenko and Andrew Higgins, “Russia and Ukraine Swap Dozens of Prisoners, in a ‘First Step to Stop the War,’” The New York Times, updated April 9, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/07/world/europe/russia-ukraine-prisoner-swap.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    144. Heather Knauert, Spokesperson, statement on “Russia’s Harassment of International Shipping Transiting the Kerch Strait and Sea of Azov,” U.S. Department of State, August 30, 2018, https://ru.usembassy.gov/russias-harassment-of-international-shipping-transiting-the-kerch-strait-and-sea-of-azov/ (accessed June 26, 2021).
    145. Current Time, Crimea.Realities, and Stuart Greer, “Ukraine’s Mariupol Port Struggles to Stay Afloat amid Russian ‘Hybrid War,’” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, November 21, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-s-mariupol-port-struggles-to-stay-afloat-amid-russian-hybrid-war-/30285170.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    146. Cory Welt, “Moldova: An Overview,” Congressional Research Service In Focus No. 10894, updated March 9, 2020, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/download/IF/IF10894/IF10894.pdf/ (accessed June 28, 2021).
    147. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “OSCE Expresses Concern over Russian Forces Actions in Transdniester,” August 16, 2018, https://www.rferl.org/a/osce-expresses-concerns-russian-forces-transdniester/29437831.html (accessed June 20, 2021), and press release, “OSCE Mission to Moldova Concerned About Unsanctioned Military Exercises in the Security Zone,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, August 15, 2018, https://www.osce.org/mission-to-moldova/390644 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    148. Dumitru Minzarari, “Russia Perfecting Its Elections Interference Toolkit in Moldova,” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 16, Issue 12 (January 31, 2019), https://jamestown.org/program/russia-perfecting-its-elections-interference-toolkit-in-moldova/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    149. Sergey Sukhankin, “Kaliningrad: From Boomtown to Battle-Station,” European Council on Foreign Relations Commentary, March 27, 2017, https://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_kaliningrad_from_boomtown_to_battle_station_7256 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    150. Michael Krepon and Joe Kendall, “Beef up Conventional Forces; Don’t Worry About a Tactical Nuke Gap,” Breaking Defense, March 28, 2016, http://breakingdefense.com/2016/03/beef-up-conventional-forces-dont-worry-about-a-tactical-nuke-gap/ (accessed June 20, 2021), and Sukhankin, “Kaliningrad: From Boomtown to Battle-Station.”
    151. State Security Department of the Republic of Lithuania and Second Investigation Department Under the Ministry of National Defence, National Threat Assessment 2019, p. 22.
    152. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2020: The Annual Assessment of Global Military Capabilities and Defence Economics (London: Routledge, 2020), p. 171.
    153. Kalev Stoicescu and Henrik Praks, “Strengthening the Strategic Balance in the Baltic Sea Area,” International Centre for Defence and Security Report, March 2016, p. 14, https://icds.ee/wp-content/uploads/2016/Kalev_Stoicescu__Henrik_Praks_-_Strengthening_the_Strategic_Balance_in_the_Baltic_Sea_Area.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    154. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2017, p. 216, and Damien Sharkov, “Russian Military Asks Weapons Makers to Extend Range and Precision of Nuclear-Capable Iskander Missiles,” Newsweek, May 19, 2017, http://www.newsweek.com/russia-military-weapons-maker-nato-arms-missiles-iskander-nuclear-capable-612409 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    155. Andrew Osborn, “Russia Approves Warplane Deployment on Disputed Island Near Japan,” Reuters, February 2, 2018, https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-japan-russia-islands-military/russia-approves-warplane-deployment-on-disputed-island-near-japan-idUKKBN1FM179 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    156. Kyodo News, “Russia Plans to Beef up Missile Defense on Northern Kurils, Close to Islands Claimed by Japan,” The Japan Times, September 3, 2019, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/09/03/national/russia-plans-beef-missile-defense-northern-kurils-close-islands-claimed-japan/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    157. Associated Press, “Russia Deploys Missiles to Pacific Islands Claimed by Japan,” December 1, 2020, https://apnews.com/article/international-news-world-war-ii-kuril-islands-japan-russia-15dbd41dba12496daaeb1b59e5244681 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    158. Franz-Stefan Gady, “Russia Is Building Military Barracks on Disputed Kuril Islands,” The Diplomat, December 19, 2018, https://thediplomat.com/2018/12/russia-is-building-military-barracks-on-disputed-kuril-islands/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    159. Jason Lemon, “Russia Plans to Build up Troops near Western Border to Combat Increasing Threat from NATO,” Newsweek, May 31, 2021, https://www.newsweek.com/russia-plans-build-troops-near-western-border-combat-increasing-threat-nato-1596293 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    160. Roger McDermott, “Russia’s Armed Forces Strengthen Western Military District,” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 17, Issue 91 (June 24, 2020), https://jamestown.org/program/russias-armed-forces-strengthen-western-military-district/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    161. Charles Dick, “Russia Ground Forces Posture Towards the West,” Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Russia and Eurasia Programme Research Paper, April 2019, p. 12, https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/research/2019-04-04-Dick.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    162. Nick Paton Walsh, “Satellite Images Show Huge Russian Military Buildup in the Arctic,” CNN, updated April 5, 2021, https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/05/europe/russia-arctic-nato-military-intl-cmd/index.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    163. Tom Parfitt, “Russia Plants Flag on North Pole Seabed,” The Guardian, August 2, 2007, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/aug/02/russia.arctic (accessed June 20, 2021).
    164. Dmitry Gorenburg, “Russia’s New and Unrealistic Naval Doctrine,” War on the Rocks, July 26, 2017, https://warontherocks.com/2017/07/russias-new-and-unrealistic-naval-doctrine/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    165. Daniel Brown, “Russia’s Northern Fleet Beefs up Its Nuclear Capabilities to Phase ‘NATO Out of Arctic,’” Business Insider, June 1, 2017, http://www.businessinsider.com/russias-northern-fleet-beefs-up-its-nuclear-capabilities-phase-nato-out-arctic-2017-6 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    166. Joseph Trevithick, “Three Russian Ballistic Missile Submarines Just Surfaced Through the Arctic Ice Together,“ The War Zone, March 26, 2021, https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/39953/three-russian-ballistic-missile-submarines-just-surfaced-through-the-arctic-ice-together (accessed June 24, 2021).
    167. Thomas Nilsen, “Russian Bombers Simulated an Attack Against This Radar on Norway’s Barents Sea Coast,” The Barents Observer, March 5, 2018, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2018/03/russian-bombers-simulated-attack-against-radar-norways-barents-sea-coast (accessed June 20, 2021).
    168. Thomas Nilsen, “Arctic Challenge 2017 Set for Take Off,” The Barents Observer, May 16, 2017, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2017/05/arctic-challenge-2017-set-take (accessed June 20, 2019), and Nilsen, “Russian Bombers Simulated an Attack Against This Radar on Norway’s Barents Sea Coast.”
    169. “Russian Pacific Fleet Il-38N MPA Practice ASW in Arctic,” Navy Recognition, April 2, 2018, https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2018/april-2018-navy-naval-defense-news/6109-russian-pacific-fleet-il-38n-mpa-practice-asw-in-arctic.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    170. Thomas Nilsen, “U.S. Navy Will Build Airport Infrastructure in Northern Norway to Meet Upped Russian Submarine Presence,” The Barents Observer, April 16, 2021, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2021/04/us-navy-build-airport-infrastructure-northern-norway-meet-increased-russian (accessed June 20, 2021).
    171. Kostya Manenkov and Vladimir Isachenkov, “Russia’s Northernmost Base Projects Its Power Across Arctic,” Associated Press, May 18, 2021, https://apnews.com/article/arctic-europe-russia-business-technology-b67c5b28d917f03f9340d4a7b4642790 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    172. Thomas Nilsen, “FSB Gets Right to Confiscate Land from People,” The Barents Observer, May 16, 2017, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2017/05/fsb-gets-right-confiscate-land-people (accessed June 20, 2021).
    173. Atle Staalesen, “New FSB Base Opens Way for More Operations in Arctic,” The Barents Observer, January 3, 2019, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2019/01/new-fsb-base-opens-way-more-operations-arctic (accessed June 20, 2021).
    174. BBC News, “Putin Creates New National Guard in Russia ‘to Fight Terrorism,’” April 6, 2016, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35975840 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    175. Atle Staalesen, “National Guard Becomes Arctic Protector,” The Barents Observer, January 28, 2019, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2019/01/national-guard-becomes-arctic-protector (accessed June 20, 2021).
    176. Reuters, “Russia’s Novatek Approves Arctic LNG 2 Financing of $11 bln by End-Q2,” April 23, 2021, https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/russias-novatek-approves-arctic-lng-2-financing-11-bln-by-end-q2-2021-04-23/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    177. Atle Staalesen, “It’s an Order from the Kremlin: Shipping on Northern Sea Route to Reach 80 Million Tons by 2024,” The Barents Observer, May 15, 2018, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/arctic/2018/05/its-order-kremlin-shipping-northern-sea-route-increase-80-million-tons-2024 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    178. Atle Staalesen, “Shipping on Northern Sea Route Breaks Record,” The Barents Observer, December 22, 2020, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/arctic/2020/12/shipping-northern-sea-route-breaks-record (accessed June 20, 2021).
    179. Pavel Felgenhauer, “Russia Claims Total Military Superiority in the Arctic,” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 16, Issue 36 (March 14, 2019), https://jamestown.org/program/russia-claims-total-military-superiority-in-the-arctic/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    180. Elizabeth McLaughlin, “The Race for the Arctic: As New Frontier Opens, Russia Leaves US in Its Wake,” ABC News, May 10, 2017, http://abcnews.go.com/International/race-arctic-frontier-opens-russia-leaves-us-wake/story?id=47304875 (accessed June 20, 2021), and Andrew Osborn, “Putin’s Russia in Biggest Arctic Military Push Since Soviet Fall,” Reuters, January 30, 2017, http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN15E0W0 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    181. Atle Staalesen, “New Arctic Naval Base Built in 6 Months,” The Barents Observer, January 30, 2019, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/civil-society-and-media/2019/01/new-arctic-naval-base-built-6-months (accessed June 20, 2021).
    182. Atle Staalesen, “Russian Navy Announces It Will Significantly Expand Arctic Air Patrols,” The Barents Observer, January 2, 2018, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2018/01/russian-navy-announces-it-will-significantly-increase-arctic-air-patrols (accessed June 20, 2021), and Atle Staalesen, “Navy Pilots Take Off to New Arctic Bases,” The Barents Observer, March 13, 2019, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/2019/03/navy-pilots-take-new-arctic-bases (accessed June 20, 2021).
    183. Robbie Gramer, “Here’s What Russia’s Military Build-Up in the Arctic Looks Like,” Foreign Policy, January 25, 2017, http://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/25/heres-what-russias-military-build-up-in-the-arctic-looks-like-trump-oil-military-high-north-infographic-map/?utm_content=buffer12641&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer (accessed June 20, 2021).
    184. David Axe, “Russia’s Arctic MiGs can Cover the Country’s Entire Northern Shipping Route,” Forbes, March 18, 2021, https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2021/03/18/russias-arctic-migs-can-cover-the-countrys-entire-northern-shipping-route/?sh=4c9071cb7866 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    185. Staalesen, “Navy Pilots Take Off to New Arctic Bases.”
    186. Thomas Nilsen, “Russia Resumes North Pole Patrols with Fighter Jets,” The Barents Observer, February 2, 2019, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2019/02/russia-resumes-north-pole-patrols-fighter-jets (accessed June 20, 2021).
    187. Thomas Nilsen, “In Polar Night, Russia Exercises Strategic Bombers and Newest Frigate,” The Barents Observer, January 27, 2019, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2019/01/polar-night-russia-exercises-strategic-bombers-and-newest-frigate (accessed June 20, 2021).
    188. Thomas Nilsen, “Video: Russian Bombers Outside Norway for Second Time in a Week,” The Barents Observer, April 4, 2019, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2019/04/video-russian-bombers-outside-norway-second-time-week (accessed June 20, 2021).
    189. Nilsen, “Arctic Challenge 2017 Set for Take Off,” and Nilsen, “Russian Bombers Simulated an Attack Against This Radar on Norway’s Barents Sea Coast.”
    190. TASS, “Russian Pacific Fleet Il-38N MPA Practice ASW in Arctic,” Navy Recognition, April 2018 Naval Defense Industry News, https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/news/defence-news/2018/april-2018-navy-naval-defense-news/6109-russian-pacific-fleet-il-38n-mpa-practice-asw-in-arctic.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    191. Kyle Mizokami, “Watch Russia Bombers Fly over U.S. Submarines During Arctic Exercise,” Popular Mechanics, March 12, 2020, https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a31446211/russia-bombers-us-submarines/ (accessed June 20, 2021), and Thomas Nilsen, “Russian Sub Hunters Worry Air Traffic Controllers. Norway Scrambled F-16s and F-35s,” The Barents Observer, April 30, 2020, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2020/04/russian-sub-hunter-worries-air-traffic-controllers-norway-scrambled-f-16s-and-f-35s (accessed June 20, 2021).
    192. Damien Sharkov, “Russia Deploys Air Radar on Arctic Wrangel Island,” Newsweek, January 4, 2017, http://www.newsweek.com/russia-deploys-air-radar-arctic-wrangel-island-538527 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    193. Thomas Nilsen, “Russia Plans to Lay Trans-Arctic Fiber Cable Linking Military Installations,” The Barents Observer, April 24, 2018, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2018/04/russia-slated-lay-military-trans-arctic-fibre-cable (accessed June 20, 2021).
    194. Thomas Nilsen, “Work on a Russian Trans-Arctic Fiber Optic Cable Starts This Spring,” The Barents Observer, April 21, 2021, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/industry-and-energy/2021/04/work-trans-arctic-fiber-optic-cable-starts-may (accessed June 20, 2021).
    195. Thomas Nilsen, “Russia to Test-Launch Rockets Near Norway’s Arctic Coast in Last Days of Trident Juncture,” Radio Canada International, Eye on the Arctic, October 31, 2018, http://www.rcinet.ca/eye-on-the-arctic/2018/10/31/russia-missile-launch-norway-finnmark-arctic-flight-nato-trident-juncture/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    196. Thomas Nilsen, “Northern Fleet Frigate Fired Missile at Target on Novaya Zemlya as British Reconnaissance Aircraft was Watching,” The Barents Observer, March 25, 2021, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/security/2021/03/northern-fleet-makes-ready-missile-tests (accessed June 20, 2021).
    197. Mathieu Boulègue, “Russia’s Military Posture in the Arctic: Managing Hard Power in a ‘Low Tension’ Environment,” Chatham House: The Royal Institute of International Affairs Research Paper, June 2019, p. 16, https://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/2019-06-28-Russia-Military-Arctic_0.pdf (accessed June 27, 2021).
    198. Stephen Blank, “Russia’s New Arctic Base Continue[s] the Militarization of the High North,” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 12, Issue 202 (November 6, 2015), http://www.jamestown.org/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=44572&no_cache=1#.VxqCwfkrJph (accessed June 20, 2021); Osborn, “Putin’s Russia in Biggest Arctic Military Push Since Soviet Fall”; and Franz Stefan-Gady, “Russia Launches New Nuclear-Powered Icebreaker,” The Diplomat, May 27, 2019, https://thediplomat.com/2019/05/russia-launches-new-nuclear-powered-icebreaker/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    199. Reuters, “Russia Says World’s Largest Nuclear Icebreaker Embarks on Arctic Voyage,” September 22, 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-arctic-icebreaker/russia-says-worlds-largest-nuclear-icebreaker-embarks-on-arctic-voyage-idUSKCN26D1FO (accessed June 20, 2021).
    200. Thomas Nilsen, “Russia’s New Giant Icebreaker Sailed Straight to the North Pole,” The Barents Observer, October 5, 2020, https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/arctic/2020/10/russias-new-giant-icebreaker-sailed-straight-north-pole (accessed June 20, 2021).
    201. Gorenburg, “Russia’s New and Unrealistic Naval Doctrine.”
    202. Brown, “Russia’s NATO Northern Fleet Beefs up Its Nuclear Capabilities to Phase ‘NATO Out of Arctic.’”
    203. Kyle Mizokami, “Russia Launches Belgorod, the World’s Longest Submarine,” Popular Mechanics, April 24, 2019, https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a27243915/russia-launches-belgorod-the-worlds-longest-submarine/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    204. Alex Lockie, “Russia Says It’s Going to Arm a Submarine with 6 Nuclear ‘Doomsday’ Devices,” Business Insider, March 12, 2019, https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-to-arm-a-secretive-submarine-with-6-nuclear-doomsday-devices-2019-3 (accessed June 20, 2021). See also TASS, “Russian Northern Fleet Creates Submarine Division for Deep-Water Operations,” Navy Recognition, posted April 27, 2018, https://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php/naval-news/naval-news-archive/2018/april-2018-navy-naval-defense-news/6169-russian-northern-fleet-creates-submarine-division-for-deep-water-operations.html (accessed June 20, 2021), and RIA Novosti, “Russia to Convert Belgorod Submarine for Special Missions,” RP Defense, February 9, 2012, http://rpdefense.over-blog.com/article-russia-to-convert-belgorod-submarine-for-special-missions-98932964.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    205. Lockie, “Russia Says It’s Going to Arm a Submarine with 6 Nuclear ‘Doomsday’ Devices.”
    206. Sputnik, “Russian Navy to Receive Biggest and Most Unique Nuclear Submarine in the World,” updated April 23, 2017, https://sputniknews.com/military/201704231052905471-russia-navy-biggest-sub/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    207. TASS, “Russia’s Khabarovsk Submarine to Be Launched in Fall 2021,” Naval News, April 19, 2021, https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/04/russias-khabarovsk-submarine-to-be-launched-in-fall-2021/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    208. Ronald O’Rourke, Laura B. Comay, Peter Folger, John Frittelli, Marc Humphries, Jane A. Leggett, Jonathan L. Ramseur, Pervaze A. Sheikh, and Harold F. Upton, “Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. R41153, updated May 17, 2021, p. 20, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41153.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    209. Civil Georgia, “Moscow, Sokhumi Endorse Final Text of New Treaty,” November 22, 2014, http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=27841 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    210. Civil Georgia, “Tbilisi Condemns Russia’s Move to Sign New Treaty with Sokhumi,” November 22, 2014, http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=27842 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    211. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “U.S. Condemns Russian Military Deal with Georgian Breakaway Region,” January 26, 2018, https://www.rferl.org/a/u-s-condemns-russian-ossetia-military-deal-georgia/29000754.html (accessed June 20, 2021), and press statement, “Russia’s Violations of Georgian Sovereignty,” U.S. Department of State, January 26, 2018, https://2017-2021.state.gov/russias-violations-of-georgian-sovereignty/index.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    212. News release, “Georgia—Javelin Missiles and Command Launch Units,” U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency, November 20, 2017, http://www.dsca.mil/major-arms-sales/georgia-javelin-missiles-and-command-launch-units (accessed June 20, 2021), and Agenda.ge, “After Javelins Georgia to Receive Further Defence Weaponry from US, Stingers,” June 20, 2018, https://agenda.ge/en/news/2018/1321 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    213. Adrian Croft, “Georgia Says Russia Bent on ‘Creeping Annexation’ of Breakaway Regions,” Reuters, February 26, 2015, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-georgia-russia-idUSKBN0LU2M020150226 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    214. U.S. Embassy in Georgia, “Statement on Continued ‘Borderization’ Activities Along the ABL, as Well as Disinformation Campaign Against the Lugar Center,” May 27, 2020, https://ge.usembassy.gov/u-s-embassy-statement-on-continued-borderization-activities-along-the-abl-as-well-as-the-disinformation-campaign-against-the-lugar-center-may-27/#.Xs57tRzLz2g.twitter (accessed June 20, 2021).
    215. Andrew Osborn, “Russia to Beef up Military Presence in Former Soviet Space,” The Telegraph, August 18, 2010, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/7952433/Russia-to-beef-up-military-presence-in-former-Soviet-space.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    216. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2020, p. 184.
    217. Joshua Kucera and Bradley Jardine, “Armenia Elects Protest Leader as Prime Minister,” Eurasianet, May 8, 2018, https://eurasianet.org/s/armenia-elects-protest-leader-as-prime-minister (accessed June 20, 2021).
    218. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Armenian Service, “U.S. Frowns on Armenia’s Involvement in Russia-Backed Syria Mission,” February 13, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/us-frowns-on-armenia-s-involvement-in-russia-backed-syria-mission/29768111.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    219. In 1991, the Azerbaijan SSR Parliament dissolved the Nagorno–Karabakh Autonomous Oblast and divided the area among five rayons (administrative regions) in Azerbaijan.
    220. Luke Coffey, “Winners and Losers of the Second Karabakh War,” Arab News, November 21, 2020, https://www.arabnews.com/node/1766356 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    221. Andrew Kramer, “Facing Military Debacle, Armenia Accepts a Deal in Nagorno-Karabakh War,” The New York Times, updated February 25, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/09/world/middleeast/armenia-settlement-nagorno-karabakh-azerbaijan.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    222. Al Jazeera, “Azerbaijan Accuses Armenia of Shooting as Border Tensions Rise,” May 28, 2021, https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/5/28/azerbaijan-accuses-armenia-of-shooting-as-border-tensions-rise (accessed June 20, 2021).
    223. Jack Farchy, “Russia Senses Opportunity in Nagorno–Karabakh Conflict,” Financial Times, April 19, 2016, https://next.ft.com/content/3d485610-0572-11e6-9b51-0fb5e65703ce (accessed June 20, 2021), and Nurlan Aliyev, “Russia’s Arms Sales: A Foreign Policy Tool in Relations with Azerbaijan and Armenia,” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor, Vol. 15, Issue 47 (March 28, 2018), https://jamestown.org/program/russias-arms-sales-foreign-policy-tool-relations-azerbaijan-armenia/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    224. Eduard Abrahamyan, “Is Russia Cultivating ‘Symmetric Separatism’ in Karabakh?” Jamestown Foundation Eurasia Daily Monitor; Vol. 16, Issue 83 (June 5, 2019), https://jamestown.org/program/is-russia-cultivating-symmetric-separatism-in-karabakh/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    225. Editorial Board, “The Lessons of Idlib,” The Wall Street Journal, March 3, 2020, https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-lessons-of-idlib-11583281376 (accessed June 29, 2021).
    226. Reuters, “Russia Establishing Permanent Presence at Its Syrian Bases: RIA,” December 26, 2017, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-russia-bases/russia-establishing-permanent-presence-at-its-syrian-bases-ria-idUSKBN1EK0HD (accessed June 28, 2021).
    227. TASS, “Russia Builds up Mediterranean Naval Force,” Naval News, May 6, 2020, https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2020/05/russia-builds-up-mediterranean-naval-force/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    228. Jamie Dettmer, “Russia Expands Military Facilities in Syria,” Voice of America, May 12, 2021, https://www.voanews.com/middle-east/russia-expands-military-facilities-syria (accessed June 20, 2021).
    229. Reuters, “Russia to Upgrade Its Naval, Air Bases in Syria: Interfax,” January 15, 2017, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-syria-russia-base-idUSKBN14Z0FQ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    230. Jonathan Marcus, “Russia S-400 Syria Missile Deployment Sends Robust Signal,” BBC News, December 1, 2015, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34976537 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    231. Ben Brimelow, “Russia’s Newest Anti-Air Defenses Are in Syria—and the US Should Be Worried,” Business Insider, April 11, 2018, http://www.businessinsider.com/pantsir-s1-makes-russian-air-defenses-stronger-2018-2 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    232. Atlantic Council, Digital Forensic Research Lab, “#PutinAtWar: Russia Fortifies Air Base in Khmeimim,” November 11, 2018, https://medium.com/dfrlab/putinatwar-russia-fortifies-air-base-in-khmeimim-803f4cc07946 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    233. Reuters, “Syria Agrees to Let Russia Expand Hmeimim Air Base,” August 19, 2020, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-syria-airbase/syria-agrees-to-let-russia-expand-hmeimim-air-base-idUSKCN25F2BP (accessed June 20, 2021).
    234. BBC News, “Russia Used Syria as Live-Fire Training—US General,” December 22, 2016, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-38402506 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    235. International Institute for Strategic Studies, The Military Balance 2019: The Annual Assessment of Global Military Capabilities and Defence Economics (London: Routledge, 2019), p. 168.
    236. Tom O’Connor, “Russia Is ‘Forcing’ U.S. Military Out of Syria and Testing New Weapons to Help, Reports Say,” Newsweek, December 17, 2018, https://www.newsweek.com/russia-forcing-us-out-syria-new-weapons-1262207 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    237. Associated Press, “Putin Hails Russian Arms Sales Abroad,” December 16, 2019, https://apnews.com/10890594de4c91991cd3c1babdf6406d (accessed June 20, 2021).
    238. Ryan Browne, “US Official: Russia Apologized After Russian Jet Performed Barrel Roll over US Plane,” CNN, updated May 25, 2017, http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/25/politics/russia-us-aircraft-barrel-roll/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    239. Anne Barnard, “Russia Says Deal Bars American Jets from Much of Syria’s Skies. U.S. Says No,” The New York Times, May 5, 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/05/world/middleeast/syria-deescalation-zones-russia-iran-turkey.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    240. Chad Garland, “US and Russian Forces Have Clashed Repeatedly in Syria, US Envoy Says,” Stars and Stripes, November 23, 2018, https://www.stripes.com/news/us-and-russian-forces-have-clashed-repeatedly-in-syria-us-envoy-says-1.557790 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    241. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “Putin, Egyptian Leader Sign ‘Strategic’ Partnership Treaty,” October 17, 2018, https://www.rferl.org/a/putin-egytian-leader-el-sissi-discuss-increasing-arms-sales-direct-air-links-moscow-visit-sochi/29547819.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    242. Vladimir Isachenkov, “Russia Negotiates Deal for Its Warplanes to Use Egypt Bases,” Associated Press, November 30, 2017, https://apnews.com/bdfae4502ca74c1eacdbf6d32252e8f4 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    243. “Russia Secures $2Bln Fighter Jet Contract with Egypt—Reports,” The Moscow Times, March 18, 2019, https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/03/18/russia-secures-2bln-fighter-jet-contract-with-egypt-reports-a64842 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    244. Derek Bisaccio, “Su-35 Production for Egypt Begins,” Defense & Security Monitor Blog, May 18, 2020, https://dsm.forecastinternational.com/wordpress/2020/05/18/egyptian-su-35-production-begins/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    245. News release, “Russia, Wagner Group Continue Military Involvement in Libya,” U.S. Africa Command, July 24, 2020, https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/2287821/russia-wagner-group-continue-military-involvement-in-libya/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    246. James Marson, “After Military Push in Syria, Russia Plays Both Sides in Libya,” The Wall Street Journal, updated June 7, 2018, https://www.wsj.com/articles/after-military-push-in-syria-russia-plays-both-sides-in-libya-1528372802 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    247. Ryan Browne and Chandelis Duster, “Russia Intercepts US Navy Aircraft over Mediterranean Sea,” CNN, updated April 20, 2020, https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/20/politics/russian-military-intercepts-us-navy-aircraft/index.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    248. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “Russian Fighters Intercept U.S. Aircraft, Risk Midair Collision, U.S. Navy Says,” May 27, 2020, https://www.rferl.org/a/us-navy-russia-su35-aircraft/30636592.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    249. Julian E. Barnes, “A Russian Ghost Submarine, Its U.S. Pursuers and a Deadly New Cold War,” The Wall Street Journal, October 20, 2017, https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-russian-ghost-submarine-its-u-s-pursuers-and-a-deadly-new-cold-war-1508509841 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    250. Christopher Woody, “Top U.S. Commander in Europe Says Russia’s Subs Are Getting Busier, as Trump Cuts Sub-Hunting Planes from the Pentagon Budget,” Business Insider, February 26, 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com/russia-subs-getting-busier-and-harder-to-track-in-atlantic-2020-2 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    251. Daniel Kochis, “A Roadmap for Strengthened Transatlantic Pathways in the Western Balkans,” Heritage Foundation Backgrounder No. 3286, March 16, 2018, p. 4, https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/report/roadmap-strengthened-transatlantic-pathways-the-western-balkans.
    252. Leonid Bershidsky, “Russia Re-Enacts the Great Game in the Balkans,” Bloomberg, corrected January 20, 2017, https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-01-19/russia-re-enacts-the-great-game-in-the-balkans (accessed June 20, 2021).
    253. Andrew E. Cramer and Joseph Orovic, “Two Suspected Russian Agents Among 14 Convicted in Montenegro Coup Plot,” The New York Times, May 9, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/09/world/europe/montenegro-coup-plot-gru.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    254. Samir Kajosevic, “China Replaces Russia as Largest Investor in Montenegro,” Balkan Insight, October 20, 2020, https://balkaninsight.com/2020/10/20/china-replaces-russia-as-largest-investor-in-montenegro/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    255. Andrew Rettman, “Nato to Add Macedonia Despite Putin Warning,” EUobserver, February 7, 2019, https://euobserver.com/foreign/144109 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    256. Helene Cooper and Eric Schmitt, “U.S. Spycraft and Stealthy Diplomacy Expose Russian Subversion in a Key Balkans Vote,” The New York Times, October 9, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/09/us/politics/russia-macedonia-greece.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    257. Ibid.
    258. Kochis, “A Roadmap for Strengthened Transatlantic Pathways in the Western Balkans,” p. 9.
    259. Ibid., p. 4.
    260. Dusan Stojanovic, “Another European Country Has Bought Russian Anti-Aircraft Weapons at Putin’s Suggestion—and over US Warnings,” Business Insider, February 24, 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com/more-russian-weapons-for-serbia-despite-us-sanction-threats-2020-2 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    261. Marc Santora and Neil MacFarquhar, “Putin Gets Red Carpet Treatment in Serbia, a Fulcrum Once More,” The New York Times, January 17, 2019, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/17/world/europe/serbia-putin-russia-belgrade-vucic.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    262. Snezana Bjelotomic, “Serbia and Russia Sign 26 Intergovernmental Agreements During Putin’s Visit,” Serbian Monitor, January 18, 2019, https://www.serbianmonitor.com/en/serbia-and-russia-sign-26-intergovernmental-agreements-during-putins-visit/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    263. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Balkan Service, “Serbia Signs Trade Agreement with Russia-Led Eurasian Economic Union,” October 25, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/serbia-to-ink-trade-agreement-with-russia-led-eurasian-economic-union/30235917.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    264. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “On Visit to Serbia, Putin Accuses Kosovo of ‘Illegally’ Setting up an Army,” January 17, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/ahead-of-high-level-visit-to-serbia-putin-blasts-west-s-role-in-balkans/29714843.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    265. Vincent L. Morelli and Sarah E. Garding, “Serbia: Background and U.S. Relations,” Congressional Research Service Report for Members and Committees of Congress No. R44955, updated November 16, 2018, p. 13, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R44955.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    266. Srpska Republika News Agency and N1 Sarajevo, “RS President: Republika Srpska Has Very Good Relations with Serbia and Russia,” N1, January 5, 2019, http://rs.n1info.com/English/NEWS/a449708/RS-President-Republika-Srpska-has-very-good-relations-with-Serbia-and-Russia.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    267. Reuters, “Russia Backs Bosnia’s Integrity amid Serb Calls for Secession,” September 21, 2018, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-bosnia-russia/russia-backs-bosnias-integrity-amid-serb-calls-for-secession-idUSKCN1M11Q4 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    268. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “Tensions Rise as Bosnian Serbs Vote in Banned Referendum,” updated September 25, 2016, https://www.rferl.org/a/balkan-tensions-rise-as-bosnian-serbs-push-ahead-with-banned-referendum/28010813.html (accessed June 208, 2021), and Gordana Knezevic, “Russia’s Fingers in Bosnia’s Pie,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, September 28, 2016, https://www.rferl.org/a/russia-putin-republika-srpska-bosnia-dodik-referendum-statehood-day/28018362.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    269. Zorica Ilic, “Russia’s Balkan Power Games on Show Ahead of Elections,” Deutsche Welle, October 6, 2018, https://www.dw.com/en/russias-balkan-power-games-on-show-ahead-of-elections/a-45781149 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    270. Andrew Byrne, “Bosnian Serb Forces Take Part in Illegal ‘Statehood Day’ Parade,” Financial Times, January 9, 2017, https://www.ft.com/content/5ffff694-d66f-11e6-944b-e7eb37a6aa8e (accessed June 20, 2021).
    271. Talha Ozturk and Gorana Jakovljevic, “Bosnian Serbs Celebrate Statehood Day Defying Court Ban,” Anadolu Agency, January 9, 2020, https://www.aa.com.tr/en/europe/bosnian-serbs-celebrate-statehood-day-defying-court-ban/1698046# (accessed June 20, 2021).
    272. Thea Morrison, “Georgia’s Breakaway S.Ossetia Signs Agreements with Republika Srpska,” Georgia Today, January 11, 2018, http://georgiatoday.ge/news/8733/Georgia%E2%80%99s-Breakaway-S.Ossetia-Signs-Agreements-with-Republika-Srpska (accessed June 20, 2021).
    273. Gordana Knezevic, “Talk of Paramilitaries, Real or Imagined, Could Fuel Division,” Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, February 21, 2018, https://www.rferl.org/a/balkans-talk-of-paramilitaries-fuel-division/29055292.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    274. Vera Mironova and Bogdan Zawadewicz, “Putin Is Building a Bosnian Paramilitary Force,” Foreign Policy, August 8, 2018, https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/08/08/putin-is-building-a-bosnian-paramilitary-force/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    275. Ibid.
    276. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Balkan Service, “Serbia Stops ‘Promo Train’ to Kosovo’s North,” January 14, 2017, https://www.rferl.org/a/28233304.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    277. Christopher Woody, “‘Good Luck, Guys’: 17 Russian Jets Buzzed a British Destroyer and Left a Threatening Message Earlier This Year,” Business Insider, November 27, 2018, https://www.businessinsider.com/17-russian-jets-buzzed-a-british-destroyer-in-the-black-sea-2018-11 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    278. Reuters, “As Syria Tensions Surge, Russian Fighter Jet Buzzes French Warship in Breach of International Law,” The Japan Times, April 11, 2018, https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/04/11/world/syria-tensions-surge-russian-fighter-jet-buzzes-french-warship-breah-international-law/#.Wx_gGIpKjcs (accessed June 20, 2021).
    279. Marcia Wendorf, “Both the U.S. and Russia Are Stalking the World’s Undersea Cables,” Interesting Engineering, August 16, 2019, https://interestingengineering.com/both-the-us-and-russia-are-stalking-the-worlds-undersea-cables (accessed June 20, 2021).
    280. Kyle Mizokami, “What Is a Russian Spy Ship Doing in the Eastern Mediterranean?” Popular Mechanics, September 19, 2017, https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a28276/yantar-spy-ship-eastern-mediterranean/ (accessed June 20, 2021), and Deb Reichmann, “Russia May Be Targeting Undersea Internet Cables. Here’s Why That’s Bad,” Yahoo News, March 30, 2018, https://www.yahoo.com/news/russia-may-targeting-undersea-internet-213130980.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    281. Ryan Browne and Zachary Cohen, “Russian Spy Ship Spotted 100 Miles off North Carolina Coast,” CNN, updated January 22, 2018, https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/22/politics/russia-spy-ship-us-coast/index.html?sr=twCNNp012218russia-spy-ship-us-coast0253PMStory&CNNPolitics=Tw (accessed June 20, 2021).
    282. Rachel S. Cohen, “Spike in Russian Aircraft Intercepts Straining Air Force Crews in Alaska, Three-Star Says,” Air Force Times, April 28, 2021, https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2021/04/28/spike-in-russian-aircraft-intercepts-straining-air-force-crews-in-alaska-three-star-says/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    283. Ibid.
    284. Corey Dickstein, “US Jets Intercept Russian Bombers off Alaskan Coast for 14th Time this Year,” Stars and Stripes, October 20, 2020, https://www.stripes.com/news/air-force/us-jets-intercept-russian-bombers-off-alaskan-coast-for-14th-time-this-year-1.649318 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    285. BBC News, “RAF Lossiemouth Jets Scrambled to Russian Planes Twice in Five Days,” April 3, 2019, https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-highlands-islands-47799660 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    286. Jelena Ćirić, “Russian Bombers Enter NATO Airspace Near Iceland,” Iceland Review, March 19, 2019, https://www.icelandreview.com/news/russian-bombers-enter-nato-airspace-near-iceland/ (accessed June 20, 2021), and Larissa Kyzer, “Russian Bombers Re-Enter NATO Airspace Near Iceland,” Iceland Review, March 29, 2019, https://www.icelandreview.com/news/russian-bombers-reenter-nato-airspace-near-iceland/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    287. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “U.S., Canadian Jets Scrambled to Escort Russian Bombers Away from North American Coastline,” January 27, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/us-canadian-jets-scramble-escort-russian-blackjack-bombers-away/29733515.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    288. Carlos M. Vazquez II and Aya Ichihashi, “Russian Bombers Violated Japan’s Airspace Twice in One Day, Defense Ministry Says,” Stars and Stripes, June 21, 2019, https://www.stripes.com/news/pacific/russian-bombers-violated-japan-s-airspace-twice-in-one-day-defense-ministry-says-1.586945 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    289. Franz-Stefan Gady, “Japan Scrambles Fighter Jets to Intercept Russian Military Reconnaissance Plane,” The Diplomat, March 29, 2019, https://thediplomat.com/2019/03/japan-scrambles-fighter-jets-to-intercept-russian-military-reconnaissance-plane/ (accessed June 20, 2021), and Franz-Stefan Gady, “Japan Scrambles Fighter Jets to Intercept 2 Russian Military Aircraft,” The Diplomat, May 6, 2019, https://thediplomat.com/2019/05/japan-scrambles-fighter-jets-to-intercept-2-russian-military-aircraft/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    290. Franz-Stefan Gady, “Japan Intercepts 2 Russian Nuclear-Capable Fighter-Bombers,” The Diplomat, January 17, 2019, https://thediplomat.com/2019/01/japan-intercepts-2-russian-nuclear-capable-fighter-bombers/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    291. Gady, “Japan Scrambles Fighter Jets to Intercept 2 Russian Military Aircraft.”
    292. Reuters, “Russia Scrambles Fighter Jet to Escort NATO Planes over Black Sea,” The Jerusalem Post, December 7, 2020, https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/russia-scrambles-fighter-jet-to-escort-nato-planes-over-black-sea-651422 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    293. News release, “NATO Jets Intercept Russian Warplanes During Unusual Level of Air Activity,” North Atlantic Treaty Organization, last updated March 30, 2021, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_182897.htm (accessed June 20, 2021).
    294. News release, “NATO Fighter Jets Intercept Russian Military Aircraft over the Baltic Sea,” North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Allied Air Command, April 21, 2021, https://ac.nato.int/archive/2021/20210420_Baltic_Intercepts (accessed June 20, 2021).
    295. Nilsen, “Russian Sub Hunters Worry Air Traffic Controllers. Norway Scrambled F-16s and F-35s.”
    296. Associated Press, “Russian Aircraft Violates Airspace of NATO Member Estonia,” ABC News, September 24, 2019, https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/russian-aircraft-violates-airspace-nato-member-estonia-65818448 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    297. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, “NATO Says Russian Su-27 Escort Jets Had No Flight Plans, Turned off Transponders,” August 14, 2019, https://www.rferl.org/a/nato-says-russian-su-27-escort-jets-had-no-flight-plans-turned-off-transponders/30109797.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    298. BBC News, “Russian Military Admits Significant Cyber-War Efforts,” February 23, 2017, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39062663 (accessed June 20, 2021).
    299. Daniel R. Coats, Director of National Intelligence, “Worldwide Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community,” statement before the Select Committee on Intelligence, U.S. Senate, January 29, 2019, p. 6, https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/2019-ATA-SFR---SSCI.pdf (accessed June 20, 2021).
    300. David Sanger, “Russian Hackers Broke into Federal Agencies, U.S. Officials Suspect,” The New York Times, May 10, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/13/us/politics/russian-hackers-us-government-treasury-commerce.html?login=smartlock&auth=login-smartlock (accessed June 24, 2021).
    301. Ibid.
    302. David E. Sanger, Nicole Perlroth, and Eric Schmitt, “Scope of Russian Hacking Becomes Clear: Multiple U.S. Agencies Were Hit,” The New York Times, updated May 10, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/14/us/politics/russia-hack-nsa-homeland-security-pentagon.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    303. “FACT SHEET: Imposing Costs for Harmful Foreign Activities by the Russian Government,” The White House, April 15, 2021, https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/04/15/fact-sheet-imposing-costs-for-harmful-foreign-activities-by-the-russian-government/ (accessed June 20, 2021).
    304. Jenna McLaughlin, “Justice Department Recovers Majority of Colonial Pipeline Ransom: ‘We turned the tables on DarkSide,’” Yahoo News, June 7, 2021, https://news.yahoo.com/justice-department-recovers-majority-of-colonial-pipeline-ransom-we-turned-the-tables-on-dark-side-210611828.html (accessed June 20, 2021), and Michael Schwirtz and Nicole Perlroth, “DarkSide, Blamed for Gas Pipeline Attack, Says It Is Shutting Down,” The New York Times, updated June 8, 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/14/business/darkside-pipeline-hack.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    305. Matt Egan and Clare Duffy, “Colonial Pipeline Launches Restart After Six-Day Shutdown,” CNBC, updated May 12, 2021, https://www.cnn.com/2021/05/12/business/colonial-pipeline-restart/index.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    306. Ryan Browne, “Hackers Behind Colonial Pipeline Attack Reportedly Received $90 Million in Bitcoin Before Shutting Down,“ CNBC, May 18, 2021, https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/18/colonial-pipeline-hackers-darkside-received-90-million-in-bitcoin.html (accessed June 20, 2021).
    307. News release, “Department of Justice Seizes $2.3 Million in Cryptocurrency Paid to the Ransomware Extortionists Darkside,” U.S. Department of Justice, June 7, 2021, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-seizes-23-million-cryptocurrency-paid-ransomware-extortionists-darkside (accessed June 19, 2021).
    308. BBC News, “JBS: FBI Says Russia-Linked Group Hacked Meat Supplier,” June 3, 2021, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57338896 (accessed June 19, 2021).
    309. Brett Molina and Mike Snider, “JBS USA, World’s Largest Meat Supplier, Shuts Down 9 Beef Plants After Cyberattack; ‘Vast Majority’ of Plants to Open Wednesday,” USA Today, June 1, 2021, https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/shopping/2021/06/01/jbs-cyberattack-worlds-largest-meat-supplier-closes-5-beef-plants/7493850002/ (accessed June 19, 2021).
    310. David E. Sanger and Marc Santora, “U.S. and Allies Blame Russia for Cyberattack on Republic of Georgia,” The New York Times, updated February 21, 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/20/world/europe/georgia-cyberattack-russia.html (accessed June 19, 2021).
    311. Denis Pinchuk, “Patriotic Russians May Have Staged Cyber Attacks on Own Initiative: Putin,” Reuters, June 1, 2017, http://www.reuters.com/article/us-russia-economic-forum-putin-cyber-idUSKBN18S56Y (accessed June 19, 2021).
    312. Office of the Director of National Intelligence, “Annual Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community,” April 9, 2021, p. 9, https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/assessments/ATA-2021-Unclassified-Report.pdf (accessed June 19, 2021).

  • In October 2019, the U.S. released and deported to Russia Maria Butina, a convicted Russian operative who had infiltrated American conservative political groups to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.93
    undefinedundefined

  • In December 2016, the U.S. expelled 35 Russian intelligence operatives, closed two compounds in Maryland and New York that were used for espionage, and levied additional economic sanctions against individuals who took part in interfering in the 2016 U.S. election.102
    undefinedundefined

  • Undersea cables in the United States are also at risk of being tapped for valuable intelligence. Fourteen Russian sailors who died aboard a submarine that caught fire in July 2019 were suspected of attempting to tap information flowing from American undersea cables.103
    undefinedundefined
  •  

    Need I remind Marc Patrone formerly of the CRTC and the RCMP that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?

    $
    0
    0

    https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/status/1455379267521495041

     

    "If you can control the national police force, you can control the population." Cpl. Daniel Bulford, Trudeau's sniper overwatch, speaks out against the Prime Minister's extreme plans. thecountersignal.com/news/exclusive
    Replying to @TheRealKeean
     

     

     

    https://www.thecountersignal.com/theshow/trudeaus-sniper-puts-pm-on-blast

     

    EXCLUSIVE: Trudeau’s sniper detail blasts PM over mandate

    Oct 27 Written By Keean Bexte

     https://podcastaddict.com/episode/130452251

    Justin Trudeau's personal sniper detail has put the PM on blast over his mandatory vaccine plan, calling the scheme "authoritarian."
    Corporal Daniel Bulford, an officer in the RCMP speaks with journalist Keean Bexte over Trudeau's "first step" to tame the national police force and what his plans are for the rest of the population.

    Keean Bexte is an internationally recognized journalist, having broken stories on location from Hong Kong to Washington D.C.

    Bexte has a Bachelor of Science from the University of Calgary in Energy Science and Economics.

    Bexte left his position as a traveling journalist with Rebel News to become editor-in-chief of The Counter Signal.© Keean Bexte 2021

    Contact: contact@thecountersignal.com

     

     

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ye-y8ZXkg5E&ab_channel=RebelNews

     


     

    EXCLUSIVE: RCMP refer case against senior Trudeau staffer to prosecutors | Keean Bexte

    60,592 views
    Sep 4, 2019
     1.52M subscribers
    http://www.TerryGuillon.comhttp://bit.ly/2lSe7vP Keean Bexte of TheRebel.media reports: Following investigation into Meadow Lake assault, RCMP have forwarded the file against Terry Guillon to Crown prosecutors.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JryJOXc08ug&list=PL2HWRRSziC_HSIbAuvGLCpibEltqy334p&index=100&ab_channel=RebelNews 

     


     

    John McCallum, the Chinese Lobbyist | Keean Bexte files formal complaint with Lobbying Commissioner

    10,264 views
    Sep 7, 2020

     1.52M subscribers
    http://www.ChineseLobbyist.comKeean Bexte joins Ezra Levant to discuss the formal complaint he's filed to the Lobbying Commissioner naming John McCallum, Justin Trudeau's handpicked (former) ambassador to China. FULL REPORT: https://rebelne.ws/326UlQb

     

    https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/former-crtc-commissioner-hired-at-sun-news-1.1287087/comments-7.397899 

     

    A commissioner at the CRTC has left his post to join Sun News.

    CRTC logo

    A commissioner at the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission has left his post after five years to join Sun News, as the broadcaster seeks “must carry” status.

    Marc Patrone’s contract with the CRTC ended on March 18. He is now the Sun News Network’s director of news operations for Western Canada.

    The Chronicle Herald reported Patrone’s new job Friday, and CTV confirmed the move.

    Sun News vice-president Kory Teneycke sent an email to CTV News showing that the federal conflict of interest commissioner approved Patrone’s hiring.

    In a letter, the commissioner’s office noted that Patrone’s dealings with Quebecor Media took place more than one year before his last day his last day at the CRTC and were not related to Sun News Network’s licencing interests. As a result, he was not violating his post-employment obligations under the Conflict of Interest Act, the letter said.

    Sun Media is asking the CRTC to grant its news channel “mandatory carriage.” If approved, cable and satellite customers across Canada will be paying to have its news channel as part of their TV packages.

    On Thursday, a well-placed source told CTV’s Ottawa Bureau Chief Robert Fife that Sen. Mike Duffy approached a Conservative insider with connections to the CRTC three weeks ago to discuss Sun Media.

    “You know people at the CRTC,” the insider quoted Duffy as saying. “This is an important decision on Sun Media. They have to play with the team and support Sun Media’s request.”

     

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/marc-patrone-253bb960/?originalSubdomain=ca

     

    Marc Petrone Photo

    Marc Patrone 

    Media/communications professional

    About

    Communications/Media writing, strategist, social media

    Experience

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: New Blue Party of Ontario <info@newblueontario.com>
    Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 11:15:54 -0700
    Subject: Thank you for contacting the New Blue! Re: Lubna and Nadeem
    Faruqi should ask Eliot Spitzer or the FBI who I am then Go Figure why
    methinks dudes like this Yankee Whitney Tilson are dangerous N'esy Pas?
    To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

    Just a quick note to thank you for reaching out.

    You asked for another option.  Now be a part of it!  Be one of our
    first New Blue Party members!

    To join and become a member of the New Blue Party of Ontario, please
    visit www.newblueontario.com/membership

    To donate and receive a generous political tax credit, please visit
    www.newblueontario.com/donate

    Donations for the party are received by the New Blue Ontario Fund.

    Joining any one of Ontario’s establishment political parties as a
    “member” gets you nothing more than annoying telemarketing phone calls
    for donations.

    And as we have seen over the last few years in the Ontario PC Party,
    sometimes being a “member” will get you defrauded of your vote in
    fixed internal party elections!

    Being a New Blue Party member is different! As a member you will be
    able to apply to run as a candidate, participate in your local New
    Blue riding association, contribute to the policy process, and more.

    Visit www.newblueontario.com/membership to learn more.

    Due to the increased volume of emails we have been receiving with
    interest in the New Blue Party of Ontario, it has taken us longer than
    we'd like to respond.

    We can assure you that every email we receive is read.

    Thank you for your patience and your support!

    New Blue Party of Ontario Team

     

    https://twitter.com/NewBlueON/with_replies 

     

    On Friday, I joined @richardsyrett on @sauga960am to discuss Bill 12's defeat and
    @NewBlueON Party developments! Listen below!  
     
    soundcloud.com
    Victory on Bill 12 & New Blue Party Developments (The Richard Syrett...
    Jim Karahalios joins Richard Syrett on Sauga 960 AM to discuss how Belinda and the New Blue Party led the charge against Bill 12, Mandatory COVID-19 Vaccinations in the Education and Healthcare Sector
     
     
     
     
     
     @Sauga960AM
    @sauga960am
    New Podcast! "The Marc Patrone Show - October 26, 2021 - Cabinet Shuffle, Trudeau's Bodyguard Refusing to give Vax Status, RCMP Pushback on Vax Mandates" on @Spreaker
    #danmcteague#keanebexte#leoknight#newstalksauga960am#rcmp#sauga960am

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/one-of-trudeaus-bodyguards-speaks-out-forcefully-against-covid-jab-mandates-calls-them-authoritarian/ 

     

    Featured Image
    Corporal Daniel Bulford of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Screenshot

    (LifeSiteNews) – An elite member of the special police unit tasked with protecting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau blasted COVID jab mandates, saying Canadians need to stand up to government dictates before it’s too late.

    “We are free citizens in this country. We should be allowed the flexibility that if I feel comfortable with it and you feel comfortable with it and we want to have a conversation inside of a home, that’s our right to do it in my opinion,” Corporal Daniel Bulford of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) said to The Counter Signal founder Keean Bexte.

    “So visualize that line in the sand about what you’re not willing to let them take away from you, because when you look at history, these things don’t happen overnight. They happen in increments. They will incrementally take more and more away from you. And they only do it because we allow them to. Not just the police, but the civilian population, the mass of the population and again, specific to law enforcement, I think they’re targeting the RCMP.”

    In what could be a career-ending video interview that went on for nearly an hour, Bulford, who has spent the past eight years on sniper duty in Ottawa, talked in length about “authoritarian” jab mandates. 

    Bulford told Bexte that he feels “angry,” a little bit resentful, and concerned and sad for the direction that this country is heading” due to the COVID jab mandates.

    He said that Trudeau’s words and language around COVID jabs rules are “deliberately dividing the population when he’s talking about the responsible Canadians,” who take the jabs.

    “People like me, I guess the non-responsible Canadians, you are deliberately painting us as the other and even our own commissioner is using that exact same language,” Bulford said.

    “That really bothers me and people of my mindset because. You know where that can go? … That’s a malicious act.”

    Bulford grew up in northern Alberta, and is a trained sniper tasked with protecting Trudeau and other dignitaries, especially when they are in large, uncontrolled settings. In essence, his job is not unlike that of a member of the U.S. Secret Service that protects the President.

    Bulford said that he thinks the COVID jab mandates are “far more about control than it is about public health.”

    “That’s why we’re doing what we’re doing. That’s why I’m willing to put my job on the line for this. I’m ready to change careers if I need to. They can come for my job, but I will not participate in this authoritarian-type behavior. I refuse to.”

    Bulford told Bexte that when it comes to promoting the COVID jabs, he thinks that the “government and our media are under a tremendous amount of influence from powerful corporations that have big pockets.”

    “And they’re under a lot of pressure to say the things that those corporations want them to say. That’s my personal opinion,” Bulford said.

    In early October, Trudeau announced unprecedented COVID-19 jab mandates for all federal workers, which includes the RCMP and military, and said the un-jabbed will no longer be able to travel by air, boat, or train.

    Along with mandating all federal workers be jabbed, Trudeau said that all federally regulated industries such as airlines and marine transportation would also have to mandate COVID injections.

    Sniper: Mandating COVID injections on people is something that is ‘out of bounds’ 

    In his interview with Bexte, Bulford said that the government has “no business telling people what they do with their body.”

    “Bodily autonomy to me is paramount. If people out there have chosen to take the vaccine because they felt that was the right decision for them, I fully support your choice. I would never criticize you for that,” Bulford said.

    “But I have taken many steps in my life to make myself resilient to illness and disease, and I would hope that you would respect my choice to not take it because I mainly don’t believe that they’re effective, and I think we’re starting to see evidence of that in the long term, you know beyond a few months.”

    Bulford said people can “still become sick and they can still transmit” after getting the jabs. He said they are “not willing to take any of the significant safety concern, the safety risks associated with these, when they don’t even show to prevent infection and spread.”

    “But I know the language has changed, you know, earlier on, it was the best tool to beat the pandemic. It was the best tool to prevent infection and prevent the transmission of the virus. And then it changed to, people who are fully vaccinated are less likely to become infected and less likely to transmit the virus.”

    Bulford said he wanted to do his ‘own’ research on COVID jabs 

    In the interview with Bexte, Bulford said that in his position he does not interact with the public much, so he “wanted to do a little bit of research into it myself before I made before I made a decision (to get the jabs).”

    “So I asked, is it mandatory? And the answer I received at the time was, No, it’s not,” Bulford said.

    “I want to know a bit more about this, especially since I had already heard rumblings about a new method of technology being implemented.”

    Bulford said he wanted to do more of his own research into the jabs after it became apparent that COVID-19 was not as deadly as first thought in early 2020, so he decided to do “a pretty deep dive into the issue.”

    “I decided that, OK, I’m not going to take any information from anyone that is not an accredited professional and immunology, virology, vaccine development. And when it came to the medical biology and when it came to the medical side, like I’m going to pay attention to critical care physicians, people that are treating COVID patients right,” Bulford said.

    “I know from my own experience in my organization that you’re going to get the most accurate picture of the situation on the ground by talking to people that are on the frontline dealing with it.”

    Bulford then said that he is “not anti-vaccine” and that he has had many jabs such as for Yellow Fever, which most Canadians would never have to take.

    However, when it comes to the COVID jabs, Bulford said he just has “a real concern about the safety and the efficacy of these current products.”

    Bulford is a member of the group Mounties for Freedom, which is made up of active and retired RCMP members who say they cannot “willingly participate in enforcing” COVID jabs mandates,” and have called upon their top boss to investigate government officials.

    Mounties for Freedom’s open letter dated October 21 sent to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki now has 55,325 signatures.

    Many consider mandates a gross assault on individual freedoms that’s unnecessary in light of COVID-19’s high survivability among most groups, low risk of asymptomatic spread, and research indicating that post-infection natural immunity is equally protective against reinfection.

    The COVID-19 injections approved for emergency use in Canada, including the Pfizer jab for ages 12 and up, all have connections to cells derived from aborted babies.

    All four have also been associated with severe side effects such as blood clots, rashes, miscarriages, and even heart attacks in young, healthy men.

     

     

    https://mounties4freedom.ca/ 

     

    Open Letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki

    RCMP National Headquarters
    73 Leikin Dr
    Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2

    October 21, 2021

    Dear Commissioner Brenda Lucki:

    We respectfully submit this open letter to express our most sincere concerns and resolute stand against the forced coercive medical intervention of Canadians, and against the undue discrimination experienced by those exercising their lawful right to bodily autonomy. We are not against vaccinations, but as law enforcement officers, we cannot in good conscience willingly participate in enforcing mandates that we believe go against the best interests of the people we protect.

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    As Canadians, our constitutionally-protected freedoms precede the government, and may only be temporarily limited if the majority of evidence justifies such infringements as reasonable, provable, and guided by law. If presented with all available evidence in a court, we firmly believe the government implemented mandates would not hold up under scrutiny.
    As experienced investigators, we look past what information is provided and focus on how the information is presented. A proper investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible, and follow the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case, even contradictory evidence. Why, then, is there little to no tolerance for free and open debate on this matter? Many credible medical and scientific experts are being censored. Accordingly, we rightly have concerns about “the science” we are being coerced to “follow”.
    As representatives of our communities within the RCMP and representatives of the RCMP in our communities, we have never witnessed such division in our country. This sense of “Us versus Them” will be further fueled by having a police force consisting only of “vaccinated” people, while serving communities consisting of “unvaccinated” people, which goes against the community policing model the RCMP has strived to achieve.
    As law enforcement officers, we already face higher levels of stress and mental illnesses due to the nature of our work. These have been compounded – considerably – by mandates that we believe are deeply unethical, threatening our livelihood, and dividing society.
    As federal employees, what is being done to mitigate this stress? Moreover, what assurances are we given that the injections will not cause short or long-term side effects? What steps will be taken to ensure members are compensated for adverse side effects?
    Police officers are expected to preserve the peace, uphold the law, and defend the public interest. We strongly believe that forced and coerced medical treatments undermine all three and, thus, contradict our duties and responsibilities to Canadians. We remain loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights and ask you to send investigators to collect statements from medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they have been silenced – putting lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to all so the public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent.

    ABOUT US

    This letter was created from the collective thoughts, beliefs, and opinions of actively serving police officers of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from across the country. We have a wealth of experience which includes, but is not limited to, General Duty, Federal Serious and Organized Crime, School Liaison, Prime Minister Protection Detail, Emergency Response Team, Media Relations, and Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit. We come from various ranks, levels of experience, communities, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs, and vaccination statuses. Together we are the Mounties for Freedom. We are individual police officers who united in the belief that citizens, including federal employees, should not be forced and coerced into taking a medical intervention.

    OUR STANCE

    In August 2021, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced, “Federal public servants need to be fully vaccinated,” and that for those without a medical exemption who choose not to be vaccinated: “There will be consequences”1.
    Since that statement, many federal employees have been told they will be sent home without pay for refusing to receive a contested medical treatment. We have united in the belief that people should not be forced or coerced into receiving the current COVID-19 treatments – it should be voluntary. We stand united against the forced and coerced medical intervention of Canadians and against the discrimination faced by those who have exercised their right to bodily autonomy. We believe in democracy, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the Bill of Rights.
    This is not about whether people should be vaccinated – that is a personal choice.

    THE LAW

    Our primary duty as peace officers in the RCMP is the preservation of peace2. We have never witnessed the level of division in our country as we currently see from the COVID-19 pandemic. It is our responsibility, now more than ever, to make all efforts at preserving the peace in our country.
    The Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the Charter) protects fundamental rights and freedoms essential to keeping Canada a free and democratic society3. The Canadian Bill of Rights adds, “… the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge … the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions.4” It continues to say, “Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law.5
    We believe our federal and provincial governments have failed to uphold the Charter, Bill of Rights, and Constitution and we are witnessing the erosion of democracy in Canada. As you know, the Charter does not guarantee absolute freedoms. If the government is going to limit freedoms, it must establish the limitations are reasonable given all available facts. The government must adhere to a process to prove their actions are appropriate, called the Oakes test. We firmly believe, if presented with all available evidence in a court, the government implemented mandates would not pass the Oakes test. At the time of writing this letter, the Charter’s section 33 Notwithstanding Clause has not been invoked for this pandemic.
    Requiring mandatory COVID-19 treatment options is a slippery slope and allows the government to overstep its authority unchecked. It infringes on the fundamental belief in our society that the individual has the right and freedom to choose. The choice of whether to receive medical treatments has always been an individual’s right in Canada. The Canadian National Report on Immunization (1996) stated “Immunization is not mandatory in Canada; it cannot be made mandatory because of the Canadian Constitution.6” Section 2 of The Charter guarantees these fundamental freedoms through the freedom of conscience (subsection a) and the freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression (subsection b)7. Without individuals having the freedom to choose, we would not have a democratic society.
    Though the Nuremberg Code is not a law, it is internationally accepted and falls in line with the spirit of our Charter and Bill of Rights. A key component of the Nuremberg Code is that participants in a medical experiment need to participate voluntarily without any form of force or coercion8. We have obtained documentation from several Canadian doctors who have explained the current COVID-19 treatment options in Canada, being referred to as “vaccines”, were recently authorized as new drugs despite the absence of long-term data9. According to these accredited Canadian doctors, these treatment options did not meet the criteria of true vaccines until very recently when the definition of vaccine was changed10,11. Without long-term data, these vaccines are still experimental. We believe the act of removing the rights and freedoms of citizens who refuse to participate in specific COVID-19 treatment options is a form of coercion.
    The Criminal Code contains our country’s Criminal Offences and explains that a person commits an assault by intentionally applying force to someone else without that person’s consent12. The Criminal Code further explains that consent is not obtained from a person who submits, or neglects to resist, on the grounds of authority being exercised over them13. How then can someone give proper consent to a COVID-19 treatment injection when doing so under the threat of losing their job, freedoms, or livelihood? Canadian courts have already ruled that medical treatment without proper informed consent is an assault14.
    As law enforcement officers, we cannot in good conscience willingly participate in enforcing mandates that violate the laws of our country and breach the rights and freedoms of the people we protect.

    LEST WE FORGET

    Each year, on the 11th of November, we remember those who sacrificed their lives for our freedoms. From Flanders Field to Juno Beach, many Canadians have bled and died fighting tyrannical nations. We need to remember past events to prevent the repetition of history’s greatest mistakes.
    On the 30th of September, we had the opportunity to reflect on such times during our first National Day for Truth and Reconciliation. Under the direction of the Government of Canada, RCMP members were once issued lawful orders to remove children from their homes and transport them to residential schools. Canada is still recovering from the impact of those decisions and actions. The RCMP has yet to regain the trust of some citizens.
    There was a time when scientists believed humans were divided into racial hierarchies and that a person’s intelligence level and characteristics were determined by race15. These beliefs were not heavily contested and were widely accepted as scientific fact16. Phrenology was also widely accepted as being a legitimate scientific study17. These are not examples of science being wrong but of people conducting poor investigations or misunderstanding their findings. These are just two of several historical examples of widely accepted scientific truths, which became ridiculed practices.
    We look back at those times of racial hierarchy and wonder how something so wrong could have been so widely accepted as truth. It is just as hard for many people to conceptualize how RCMP officers could have blindly followed lawful orders that devastated so many lives. Yet now we find ourselves in dangerous waters, when RCMP officers are being forced under coercion and duress to participate in actions they believe go against the spirit of Canadian laws.
    We find it ironic that an organization that preaches the honour and respect of Canadian values, and the sacrifice of their veterans, would support actions that contradict the values our veterans fought to uphold. Enforcement of identification and checkpoints was an early step in what would become the Holocaust. Canadian citizens of various backgrounds are being segregated and punished for choosing not to disclose a personal medical decision. We cannot think of a more ironic and cruel way for our governments to pay homage to the sacrifices Canadians have made worldwide to protect individual freedoms than by participating in a process that takes those freedoms away.
    Today, instead of having one version of scientific “truth” during this pandemic, we have versions that contradict one another. How can some professionals be so certain their interpretation of science is correct when others give evidence to the contrary? History has already demonstrated we get things wrong even when our scientists agree.
    We acknowledge there is a spectrum filled with beliefs relating to this pandemic. For the sake of simplicity, we will refer to two main schools of thought: the common narrative (those who believe the current COVID-19 treatment injections are the way through the pandemic) and those who have concerns with the COVID-19 treatment injections. It’s important to note we are not discussing “antivaxxers” in this letter. We are discussing people with various vaccination statuses who pose questions about the current COVID-19 treatment options being forced upon them.

    THE SCIENCE

    RCMP members are not scientists nor healthcare professionals; our profession is law enforcement. We do not pretend to be experts in medical or scientific fields, but we are experienced and professional investigators: we look for the facts. Proper investigations follow simple practices that remain consistent across most fields. These practices include but are not limited to: asking the right questions, following evidence, being aware of how biases may affect results, and allowing the evidence to point to the conclusion – not allowing the conclusion to point to the evidence. Most importantly, a proper investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible and follow the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case, even contradictory evidence.
    The COVID-19 pandemic has caused several scientists and medical professionals to provide us with information they described as “science”, “scientific”, or “facts”. The problem with many of these statements is that the provided information often contradicted another piece of “scientific fact” that an equally qualified professional had produced. This makes it near impossible for the average person to know what to believe and what not to believe.
    As experienced investigators, we look past what information is provided and focus on how the information is presented. This allows us some insight into the credibility of the information. Some professionals make definitive statements such as “It’s safe and effective” or “This is the way”, giving little or no explanation of how they reached their conclusion. When the information provided is challenged or questioned, the response often indicates the answer is something that cannot be questioned. The CDC recently changed its definition of immunity and vaccine10,11, allowing the current COVID-19 treatment injections to fit the definition. This is an example of actions taken when you allow your conclusion to point to your evidence.
    Other qualified professionals have provided alternate pieces of information during this pandemic. It is not what their results were, but how they arrived at their results that we believe in. These professionals have all been able to articulate their findings quite well and are quick to admit the remaining questions they cannot answer. These professionals (from Canada18 and abroad19) have expressed warnings and concerns with the current COVID-19 treatment options condoned by the governments. Some of these concerns suggest a higher-than-average number of moderate to severe side-effects from the COVID-19 “vaccinations” compared with our traditional vaccinations19. Others have stated the current COVID-19 treatment options are proving to be less effective than initially believed20,21.
    We have attached several documents as appendices to this letter which contain information we believe raises reasonable concerns with the current COVID-19 vaccination mandates seen across our country. We encourage you to review the documents and the work each document references thoroughly. Though we understand we have provided a lot of material – which will take time and resources to read – we believe the fact that there is so much evidence opposing the mandatory roll-out of the current COVID-19 treatments is reason enough to take our concerns seriously.
    There have also been scientific papers that suggest natural immunity is a better form of protection than what the COVID-19 vaccination can give21-24. Why is antibody testing not being discussed as a potential option for RCMP members?
    Here is a list of the documents we’ve attached to this letter. These documents are a sample of what is available and were written by people (or groups) of scientific or medical professionals in fields directly related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We defer to their expertise.
    • Appendix A This is an open letter from Dr. Eric Payne, a pediatric neurologist in Alberta, to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. In his letter, Dr. Payne highlights several inconsistencies he has found with the common narrative. Dr. Payne provides several sources from around the world throughout his letter.
    • Appendix B This is the Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration. This heavily sourced document provides information on the current pandemic and makes recommendations based on their findings.
    • Appendix C This is a letter from Dr. Byram Bridle, a viral immunologist in Ontario, to the President of the University of Guelph. Dr. Bridle uses his extensive experience and qualifications to explain his concerns with the common narrative surrounding the COVID-19 treatment injections. Dr. Bridle also articulates his concerns with the COVID-19 health mandates.
    • Appendix D This is an open letter from Health Professionals United to the Alberta Health Services. The letter outlines reasons why several frontline healthcare workers in Alberta heavily oppose mandatory COVID-19 vaccination mandates.
    • Appendix E This is an open letter from frontline healthcare workers in British Columbia to Dr. Bonnie Henry, Adrian Dix, and Premier John Horgan. The author(s) state their experiences and expertise are being ignored and ask that the vaccination mandates be revoked.
    • Appendix F This is a report from Dr. Tess Lawrie from the United Kingdom. Dr. Lawrie demonstrates the abnormal number of reported adverse effects from the current COVID-19 treatment injections.
    • Appendix G This is a comprehensive report comparing natural immunity to COVID-19 vs Vaccine-Induced Immunity. It was comprised from several scientists from Ontario and British Columbia.

    CENSORSHIP

    We are not against vaccinations, and we are trying to aid our country through this pandemic. We want to participate in a way that is safe for both our physical and mental well-being. We believe it is essential for people to participate with full informed consent by understanding all the risks of what they are being asked (or in this case forced) to participate in.
    As experienced police officers, we have become accustomed to the media portraying us negatively or experienced the media misrepresenting the outcome of a police incident. It would be little to no surprise for us to hear that a media agency misreported an incident. However, it was surprising for us to learn that several of these scientists and doctors, who questioned the information fueling the COVID-19 treatment mandates, also spoke of censorship25-27.
    As experienced investigators, we know it is our responsibility to present all available facts to the public – by proxy of the courts. It is not our place to decide what the outcome of an investigation should be. Our job is to collect all available facts so that the public (the courts) can make an informed decision. We have learned from past mistakes that presenting evidence that only supports one side, while ignoring or refusing to acknowledge evidence from another side, is wrong and tarnishes an investigation. We cannot provide evidence from witnesses who agree on one story while ignoring or hiding the witnesses who agree on a different account of an incident.
    It would be unthinkable that RCMP members would blatantly disregard witnesses in an investigation to mislead the courts. The investigation would lose all integrity and the members would be criticized. Why then are we allowing this same behaviour to occur by other public figures? There are accredited medical professionals from our own country who are desperately trying to have their findings heard. Instead of allowing these professionals to speak freely and discuss their results publicly, they are being silenced by governing bodies25-27.
    Our experience in law enforcement and as investigators have allowed us to see how crucial it is that these professionals be allowed to speak openly and publicly. Without the information being included in discussions, we believe the citizens of Canada (including RCMP members) are not receiving the information they need to make an informed decision. This is contrary to our laws and beliefs, and we do not support it.
    These medical professionals have tried to stand up and support their country. We are now standing up and supporting them. They must be allowed to share their information publicly to maintain people’s faith in the government. If the people believe the government is continuing to censor experts, the country will fall into instability. This is common around the world in countries whose tyrannical governments sensor information from their people.

    DISCRIMINATION

    We strongly oppose the discrimination that has already begun to create segregation in our country. It has divided families, ended friendships, torn apart spouses, and entered the RCMP workplace. We believe the current messaging being put out by our provincial and federal governments is promoting the creation of an in-group referred to as “Vaccinated” and an out-group as “Unvaccinated”. Even worse, the out-group has been labelled “Anti-vaxxers,” a term used out of context in a negative and derogatory way. The messaging from our governments is causing the dehumanization of the “Unvaccinated” group. By dehumanizing the out-group, an institution creates a greater divide between them and the in-group.28
    Police agencies across Canada pride themselves in their efforts to hire officers reflective of the communities they serve. This allows community members to relate to their officers and see them as part of the community. We are representatives of our communities within the RCMP and representatives of the RCMP in our communities. Having a police force consisting only of “vaccinated” people while serving communities consisting of “unvaccinated” people will tear down some of the similarities RCMP members share with their communities. This will create a greater sense of “Us versus Them” between communities and police, which contradicts the community policing model the RCMP has strived to achieve for decades. We anticipate that unless this is corrected soon, it will continue to increase the divide in our country.
    Dehumanizing individuals is challenging. It is easier to attach a label and stigma to a group. That way, anyone or anything that comes from the group can be written off28. The term “Anti-vaxxer” is currently being used to mislabel and group people into a category to take away their credibility. This has allowed things to be written and said against this group that would be intolerable if written or said about any other group.
    On August 26th, 2021, the Toronto Star ran an article that read in large bold letters, “I have no empathy left for the wilfully unvaccinated. Let them die. I honestly don’t care if they die from COVID. Not even a little bit. Unvaccinated patients do not deserve ICU beds. At this point, who cares. Stick the unvaccinated in a tent outside and tend to them when the staff has time.29,30” If “willfully unvaccinated” was replaced with “Black”, “Gay”, or “willfully Muslim”, this would have been labelled a Hate Crime. How then can we allow such things to be said about people who choose not to receive a medical intervention? Should we allow the same messaging for those who choose not to get a flu shot one season?
    The boldness of this statement being printed in a major newspaper shows how acceptable it is in our society to treat people as a lower class of citizens. As RCMP members, we must preserve peace in our communities and put a stop to this.

    PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH

    This pandemic has increasingly made people feel isolated from their friends, families, and peers. RCMP members already face higher levels of stress and mental illnesses due to the nature of our work. Members affected by the double-vaccination mandate have faced greater stress and isolation as they have watched their status as citizens and regular members begin to diminish. There is currently insufficient support for these members, and there does not seem to be a plan insight to provide adequate support.
    The recent vaccination update has left some people feeling more isolated than ever. In times like this, people need support from a community, and our membership is no different. We fear there are more members afraid to speak up about these recent updates for fear of being targeted. Many members may be trying to stick this out on their own, or worse, suffering in silence. We ask that you attempt to reach out in partnership with the NPF to all members who may be negatively affected by these mandates and let them know their employer and governments support them.
    Though most people seem to have little to no side effects from the COVID-19 treatment injections, an abnormal number of moderate to severe adverse reactions have included death31. What assurances are we given that the injections will not cause short or long-term side effects? Studies show that stress and sleep can play a huge factor in whether a vaccine is effective or not32,33. Are you ensuring RCMP members are provided with the appropriate amount of rest before an injection? What steps will the RCMP take to ensure members are compensated for adverse side effects?
    We also believe enough evidence has been presented to question whether our governments’ actions in this pandemic are the most appropriate. This is causing moral and ethical stressors for some members as they no longer believe their role as police officers is reflective of the democracy Canada claims to be. Mental health and stress levels will have an impact on how members interact with the public.

    PARALLELING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

    The RCMP has taught us the importance and severity of domestic violence. Domestic violence is centred around power and control between an abuser and a victim. One of the biggest problems with domestic violence is there is often an escalation in the severity of abuse. RCMP members have been taught how to identify the signs that someone is involved in an abusive relationship. There are different types of abuse the abuser may engage in to keep control over their victim: Physical, Financial, and Emotional.
    Emotional abuse is quite complex and will often include a variety of tactics such as socially distancing the victim from friends and family, discrediting the victim so they have difficulty obtaining support from others, and making the victim believe that their thoughts and beliefs are wrong – to the point the victim thinks they must be insane. When it comes to finances, an abuser will withhold money and assets from the victim. This ensures the victim cannot survive without remaining in the abusive relationship with the abuser. When an abuser feels they are losing control over their victim, it is quite common for them to escalate their tactics to maintain control.
    The federal government is currently displaying several of those traits with its own employees, including the RCMP34.
    Commissioner Lucki, we understand your position is appointed, and we are concerned that you too may be subject to a similar relationship with the Prime Minister. Though you, as our top Mountie, should be impartial, you may be forced into supporting some of these actions out of duress. We ask that you do what we ask our domestic violence victims to do – to take a stand against the abuser. This country needs strong and supportive people in positions of authority. Please show Canadians that the RCMP will remain impartial to political agendas and true to the Charter and our Bill of Rights.

    PUBLIC INTEREST

    Lastly, we want to draw attention to the public safety issues that will arise if these COVID-19 mandates are upheld.
    Pierre Elliot Trudeau once said, “There’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation.35” How is it our federal government is now saying it will be mandatory for employees working from home to receive the COVID-19 treatment injections?36
    Regardless of their vaccination statuses, there are RCMP members who feel the steps taken by the federal and provincial governments are too extreme and do not have the best interest of Canadian citizens. Forcing these mandates will cause several RCMP officers to lose faith in the federal government’s commitment to the Charter. These RCMP officers will not participate in actions they believe contradict their morals, ethics, and Canadian laws. These RCMP officers believe it is their responsibility to challenge the federal government in court if necessary.
    The RCMP, which is already understaffed, will have additional gaps to fill across the country when these members are not working. Communities will have lost healthy and experienced officers, causing a decrease in available resources. There will also be an increase in taxpayers’ spending as the federal government attempts to fill these gaps. Being short-staffed will have a trickle-down effect causing fewer RCMP bodies to be available to properly recruit, assess, and conduct adequate background checks on potential cadets.
    Our experience in law enforcement and as investigators have allowed us to see how crucial it is that professionals be allowed to speak openly and publicly. Without including their information in discussions, we believe the citizens of Canada (including RCMP members) are not receiving the information they need to make an informed decision. This is contrary to our laws and beliefs, and we do not support it.
    We want to reiterate a point stated earlier in this letter, so it is remembered. If the people believe the government is continuing to censor experts, the country will fall into instability. We are experts in law enforcement and investigations. We are losing faith in the motives of our government, and we will not willingly participate in actions against people whose Charter rights and freedoms are being violated.

    CALL TO ACTION

    Commissioner Lucki, we ask that you represent the best image of the RCMP by remaining loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights and not to any particular public figure. Our job as Mounties is to preserve the peace. If we continue down this road of segregation and discrimination, we risk repeating past mistakes. The divide in our society is quickly leaning toward a level of national security. We ask that you open an investigation to ensure no criminal acts were committed in the dissemination of information from federal and provincial health authorities or public figures in positions of trust. We ask you to send investigators to collect statements from medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they had been silenced – putting lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to all so the public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent. As Canada’s national police force, we are unique in our ability to conduct a large-scale cross-country investigation, which must be transparent to regain trust in the government.
    We also ask that you challenge the Federal Government’s decision to send Mounties home without pay for decisions they’ve made on beliefs protected by Canadian laws. Neither the RCMP, nor the communities they serve, can endure the loss of experienced police officers.

    We await your response and your plan of action.

    Respectfully,

    Mounties for Freedom

    Mounties For Freedom
    cc.
    • The Honourable Bill Blair, Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness The Honourable Jean-Yves Duclos, President of the Treasury Board of Canada Brian Sauvé, President of the National Police Federation

    END NOTES

    1. Connolly, Amanda, “Notice Offering Options for Federal Workers Who Refuse Vaccines Was ‘Erroneous’: Trudeau,” Global News (2021). Accessed September 30, 2021, https://globalnews.ca/news/8118913/canada-mandatory-vaccines-federal-workers/.
    2. Government of Canada, “Duties,” Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. R-10). Accessed October 19, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/r-10/page-3.html.
    3. ———. “Learn about the Charter,” Accessed October 19, 2021. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/learn-apprend.html.
    4. ———. “Bill of Rights,” Canadian Bill of Rights (S.C. 1960, c. 44). Accessed October 19, 2021. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-12.3/page-1.html.
    5. Ibid.
    6. Public Health Agency of Canada, “Canadian National Report on Immunization – 1996,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://web.archive.org/web/20080414131846/http:/www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/97vol23/23s4/23s4b_e.htmlhttp:/www.phacaspc.gc.ca/publicat/ccdr-rmtc/97vol23/23s4/23s4b_e.html
    7. Government of Canada, “Guide to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms – Section 2,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/how-rightsprotected/guide-canadian-charter-rights-freedoms.html#a2b.
    8. National Institutes of Health, “The Nuremberg Code,” Accessed September 30, 2021, https://history.nih.gov/display/history/Nuremberg+Code.
    9. Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 18, par. 3. Appendix B.
    10. Payne, Eric, “RE: Mandatory mRNA Vaccine Mandate for Alberta Physicians,” (September 14, 2021), p. 1, par 1. Appendix A.
    11. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention, “Immunization: The Basics,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm.
    12. Government of Canada, “Assault,” Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), S. 265 (1)(a). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/FullText.html.
    13. ———. “Assault,” Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46), S. 265 (3)(d). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/FullText.html.
    14. Supreme Court of Canada, “Hopp v. Lepp,” 1980 CanLII 14 (SCC), [1980] 2 SCR 192. Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1980/1980canlii14/1980canlii14.html.
    15. Bryson, Bill, The Body, narrated by Bill Bryson (New York, NY: Random House Audio, 2019), Audible audio ed., 14 hrs., 4 min.
    16. Ibid.
    17. Encyclopedia.com, “Phrenology in Nineteenth-Century Britain and America,” Accessed October 19, 2021, https://www.encyclopedia.com/science/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/phrenology-nineteenth-century-britain-and-america.
    18. Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 2, par, 1. Appendix B.
    19. Dolan, Mark, and Lawrie, Tess, “16 July 2021,” YouTube, July 16, 2021, Interview, 14:56 min. Accessed on October 19, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgsXVe9IXco&t=2s.
    20. Lawrie, Tess, “RE: Urgent preliminary report of Yellow Card data up to 26th May 2021,” (June 9, 2021), p. 6, par. 4. Appendix F.
    21. Bridle, Byram, “COVID-19 Vaccines and Children: A Scientist’s Guide for Parents,” (June 15, 2021), p. 2, par. 2. Accessed October 20, 2020, https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/2021-06-15-children_and_covid-19_vaccines_full_guide.pdf.
    22. Canadian Covid Care Alliance, “Canadian Covid Care Alliance Declaration,” (September 24, 2021), p. 2-3. Appendix B.
    23. Bridle, Byram, “An Open Letter to the President of the University of Guelph,” (September 17, 2021), p. 2. Appendix C.
    24. Mallard, Bonnie, et al., “Which is better for future COVID-19 prevention: Immunity Following Natural Infection or Vaccine-Induced Immunity?” (October 8, 2021), p. 2, par. 3. Appendix G.
    25. Payne, Eric, “RE: Mandatory mRNA Vaccine Mandate for Alberta Physicians,” (September 14, 2021), p. 1-14. Appendix A.
    26. Dzsurdzsa, Cosmin, “Derek Sloan Hosts Press Conference with Censored Doctors,” True North News. Accessed October 20, https://tnc.news/2021/06/17/derek-sloan-hosts-press-conference-with-censored-doctors/.
    27. Sloan, Derek, “Censorship in Canada,” Vimeo, June 17, 2021, CPAC Parliamentary Press Conference, 3:15. Accessed on October 20, 2021, https://standupcanada.solutions/censorship-in-canada.
    28. Wilkerson, Isabel, Caste, narrated by Robin Miles (New York, NY: Random House Audio, 2020), Audible audio ed., 14 hrs., 26 min.
    29. Slapinski, Mark, “‘Hate Speech’: The Toronto Star Slammed for Headline Wishing Death on the Unvaccinated,” Toronto 99. Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.toronto99.com/2021/08/26/hate-speech-the-toronto-star-slammed-for-headline-wishing-death-on-the-unvaccinated/.
    30. Bridle, Byram, “An Open Letter to the President of the University of Guelph,” (September 17, 2021), p. 5. Appendix C.
    31. Dolan, Mark, and Lawrie, Tess, “16 July 2021,” YouTube, July 16, 2021, Interview, 14:56 min. Accessed on October 20, 2021, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PgsXVe9IXco&t=2s.
    32. Walker, Matthew, Why We Sleep, narrated by Steve West (New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Audio, 2017), Audible audio ed., 13 hrs., 52 min.
    33. Ibid.
    34. Sauvé, Brian, “Members who do not complete an attestation to being fully vaccinated can expect to be put on administrative Leave Without Pay,” National Police Federation (October 7, 2021). Email broadcast to NPF members.
    35. CBC Archives, “Trudeau: There’s no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nation,” CBC News (1967). Accessed October 20, 2021, https://www.cbc.ca/archives/entry/omnibus-bill-theres-no-place-for-the-state-in-the-bedrooms-of-the-nation.
    36. Johnson, Gail, “Declare Your Covid-19 Vaccination Status,” RCMP NOC News. Email broadcast to RCMP members.

     

     

    https://www.spreaker.com/user/sauga960am/oct-26-the-marc-patrone-show-podcast?fbclid=IwAR2pRusW4RHg2WSlDAoEFYeSxLtSJjsTQ6ooAUgiQyfF0iSI-wOslTLtWX8 


    The Marc Patrone Show - October 26, 2021 - Cabinet Shuffle, Trudeau's Bodyguard Refusing to give Vax Status, & RCMP Pushback on Vax Mandates

     

    I called you ealier today before blogging about you dudes

     

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/11/need-i-remind-marc-patrone-formerly-of.html

     

    https://www.spreaker.com/show/the-marc-patrone-show

     

    The Marc Patrone Show

    https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/dpr-rmr/2007-2008/inst/rtc/rtc04-eng.asp

     

    Symbol of the Government of Canada

    ARCHIVED - Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission


    Archived Content

    Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.

    APPENDICES

    Appendix A: CRTC Members and Offices


    CRTC Members
    ChairmanKonrad von Finckenstein(819) 997-3430
    Vice-Chairman, BroadcastingMichel Arpin(819) 997-8766
    Vice-Chairman, TelecommunicationsLen Katz(819) 997-8766
    CommissionerRita Cugini,* Ontario(819) 997-2431
    (416) 954-6269
    (604) 666-2914
    CommissionerTimothy Denton
    CommissionerElizabeth Duncan,* Atlantic(819) 997-4764
    (902) 426-2644
    CommissionerSuzanne Lamarre,* Quebec(819) 997-3831
    Commissioner (Part-Time)Peter Menzies *

    Alberta/Northwest Territories

    (819) 953-0435
    (780) 455-6390
    CommissionerCandice Molnar *
    CommissionerMichel Morin
    CommissionerMarc Patrone
    CommissionerLouise Poirier
    CommissionerSteven Simpson, * British Columbia

    * These commissioners also have regional responsibilities


    Client Services - Central Office
    Telephone (Toll-Free)
    1-877-249-CRTC (2782)
    Client Services(819) 997-0313
    Public Examination Room(819) 997-2429
    Access to Information and Privacy(819) 994-5366
    Library(819) 997-4484
    TDD (Toll-Free)1-877-909-2782
    Media Relations(819) 997-9403
    Fax Numbers
    General(819) 994-0218
    Communications(819) 997-4245
    Finance and Corporate Services(819) 953-5107
    General Counsel(819) 953-0589
    Human Resources Information(819) 953-5107
    Electronic Access
    Internethttp://www.crtc.gc.ca

     


    CRTC Offices
    Central Office
    Les Terrasses de la Chaudi�re
    Central Building
    1 Promenade du Portage
    Gatineau, Quebec
    J8X 4B1

    Tel.: (819) 997-0313
    Fax: (819) 994-0218
    TDD: 1-877-909-2782

    Mailing address:
    CRTC
    Ottawa, Ontario
    K1A 0N2

    Ontario
    55 St. Clair Avenue East
    Suite 624
    Toronto, Ontario
    M4T 1M2

    Tel.: (416) 952-9096
    Fax: (416) 954-6343

    In Nova Scotia
    Metropolitan Place
    99 Wyse Road
    Suite 1410
    Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
    B3A 4S5

    Tel.: (902) 426-7997
    Fax: (902) 426-2721
    TDD: (902) 426-6997

    In Saskatchewan
    Cornwall Professional Bldg.
    2125-11th Avenue
    Suite 103
    Regina, Saskatchewan
    S4P 3X3

    Tel.: (306) 780-3422
    Fax: (306) 780-3319

    In Quebec
    205 Viger Avenue West
    Suite 504
    Montr�al, Qu�bec
    H2Z 1G2

    Tel.: (514) 283-6607
    Fax: (514) 283-3689

    In Alberta
    Standard Life Centre
    10405 Jasper Avenue,
    Suite 520
    Edmonton, Alberta
    T5J 3N4

    Tel.: (780) 495-3224
    Fax: (780) 495-3214

    In Manitoba
    275 Portage Avenue
    Suite 1810
    Winnipeg, Manitoba
    R3B 2B3

    Tel.: (204) 983-6306
    Fax: (204) 983-6317
    TDD: (204) 983-8274

    In British Columbia
    580 Hornby Street
    Suite 530
    Vancouver, British Columbia
    V6C 3B6

    Tel.: (604) 666-2111
    Fax: (604) 666-8322
    TDD: (604) 666-0778


    Appendix B: Legislation, Directions and Associated Regulations

    Statutes


    Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission ActR.S.C. 1985, c. C-22, as amended
    Broadcasting ActS.C. 1991, c. 11, as amended
    Telecommunications ActS.C. 1993, c. 38, as amended

    Directions, Regulations and Rules of Procedure

    Direction to the CRTC (Ineligibility of Non-Canadians)
    Direction to the CRTC (Ineligibility to Hold Broadcasting Licences)
    Direction to the CRTC (Reservation of Cable Channels)
    CRTC Rules of Procedure
    Broadcasting Information Regulations, 1993
    Broadcasting Licence Fee Regulations, 1997
    Broadcasting Distribution Regulations
    Pay Television Regulations, 1990
    Radio Regulations, 1986
    Specialty Service Regulations, 1990
    Television Broadcasting Regulations, 1987
    CRTC Tariff Regulations
    CRTC Telecommunications Rules of Procedure
    Telecommunications Fee Regulations, 1995
    Canadian Telecommunications Common Carrier Ownership and Control Regulations

    Fwd: CRTC Reference: 770193 YO Minister Guilbeault Say Hey to the lawyers Melanie Joly and Ellen Desmond for me will ya?

       Inbox 
    Add star 

    David Amos

    <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    AttachmentFri, Aug 28, 2020 at 6:59 PM
    To: hon.steven.guilbeault@canada.ca, steven.guilbeault@canada.ca, Ellen.Desmond@crtc.gc.ca, Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca, martine.turcotte@bell.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, graeme.mcphail@rci.rogers.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Frank.McKenna@td.com, prmibullrun@gmail.com, Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca, Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, traversy.n@gmail.com, kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, kevin.leahy@pps-spp.gc.ca, sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com, Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, PREMIER@novascotia.ca, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com
    Ellen C. Desmond Commissioner
    Commissioner, Atlantic Region & Nunavut
    Metropolitan Place,
    99 Wyse Road, Suite 1410       
    Dartmouth Nova Scotia

    902-426-2644

    Minister Guilbeault Announces Two New Appointments to the CRTC Français

    News provided by
    Canadian Heritage

    Jun 25, 2020, 09:00 ET

    Share this article

    The Government of Canada announces the appointments of Ellen C.
    Desmond and Nirmala Naidoo as regional members of the Canadian
    Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission

    OTTAWA, ON, June 25, 2020 /CNW/ - The Honourable Steven Guilbeault,
    Minister of Canadian Heritage, today announced two new appointments to
    the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission
    (CRTC): Ellen C. Desmond as regional member for Atlantic and Nunavut,
    and Nirmala Naidoo as regional member for Alberta and Northwest
    Territories. Each will serve a five-year term.

    Ellen C. Desmond, of New Brunswick, is the Director of Legal and
    Administration with the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board.
    Prior to joining the Energy Board in 2006, Ms. Desmond was engaged in
    private practice for over 12 years. Ms. Desmond received a Bachelor of
    Arts from St. Thomas University, a Bachelor of Law from the University
    of New Brunswick (UNB), a Masters in Social Work from Carleton
    University and a Masters in Law from York University. She has taught
    on a part time basis at UNB Law School for several years. Ms. Desmond
    is the current Chair of the Administrative Law Section for the
    Canadian Bar Association (New Brunswick Branch), a member of the Board
    for Symphony New Brunswick, a member of the Accounting and Auditing
    Standards Oversight Council, and the Atlantic Canada Lead for Women
    General Counsel Canada.

    Nirmala Naidoo, of Alberta, is a veteran award-winning television
    anchor, journalist and communications expert. She has worked for CTV's
    W5, NBC London, Christian Science Monitor Television (London), Visnews
    (London), and Middle East Broadcasting (London). She was the evening
    news anchor for Global Calgary and CBC Calgary. She is an outspoken
    advocate and keynote speaker for human rights issues. Ms. Naidoo is
    also a champion of environmental sustainability and worked as a senior
    manager for the Alberta Climate Change Office and Executive Director
    for Green Calgary. She holds a Bachelor's degree in arts from the
    University of Alberta and an Honours Bachelor's degree in journalism
    from Carleton University.

    The CRTC is an administrative tribunal that regulates and supervises
    broadcasting and telecommunications on behalf of Canadians. The
    Commission is dedicated to ensuring that media content creators and
    consumers have access to a world-class communication system that
    promotes innovation and enriches their lives.

    Quotes

    "Today, I have the pleasure of announcing the appointments of Ellen C.
    Desmond and Nirmala Naidoo as regional members of the CRTC. Their
    extensive expertise in the industry will be strong assets to the CRTC.
    I am confident that they will play a pivotal role in bringing forward
    their respective region's perspectives. Congratulations to both of
    you! These positions were previously occupied by Christopher MacDonald
    and Linda Vennard, and I'd like to thank them both for the proven
    leadership they displayed during their time at the CRTC."

    —The Honourable Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Canadian Heritage

    Quick Facts

    In 2016, the Government of Canada adopted a new approach to
    Governor-in-Council appointments. This approach respects the principle
    of diversity and is based on an open, transparent and merit-based
    selection process. It results in the recommendation of competent
    candidates who reflect Canadian diversity.

    As they become available, all appointment opportunities within the 16
    organizations in the Canadian Heritage Portfolio are posted on the
    Governor in Council Appointments website. Those interested can apply
    online.

    Associated Links

    Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 15:17:54 -0400
    Subject: Fw: CRTC Reference: 770193 Cya in Federal Court Mr Blais
    To: "jean-pierre.blais"<jean-pierre.blais@crtc.gc.ca>,
    "martine.turcotte"<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, jkee <jkee@google.com>,
    "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>,
    graeme.mcphail@rci.rogers.com"Melanie.Joly"<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
    "Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, MulcaT
    < MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, "Michael.Wernick"
    < Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca>


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: CRTC DONOTRESPOND/NEPASREPONDRE
    Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 10:30 AM
    To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    Subject: CRTC Reference: 770193

    Good morning Mr. Amos:

    Further to your correspondence of May 19th, and after an extensive
    review of the other issues you have raised, we have concluded that we
    do not have jurisdiction over these matters.

    Therefore, we consider all matters you have previously contacted this
    office about to be closed. Please note that we will no longer respond
    to any correspondence from you on these subjects.

    Sincerely,

    Chantal Proulx
    Client Services | Services à la clientèle
    Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission | Conseil
    de la radiodiffusion et des télécommunications canadiennes
    Ottawa, Canada K1A 0N2
    Telephone | Téléphone 1-877-249-2782 / TTY | ATS 1-877-909-CRTC (2782)
    Outside Canada | Hors Canada 819-997-0313 / TTY | ATS 819-994-0423
    Facsimile / Télécopieur 819-994-0218
    Government of Canada | Gouvernement du Canada
    http://www.crtc.gc.ca
    Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/CRTCeng | Suivez-nous sur
    Twitter (@CRTCfra): https://twitter.com/CRTCfra
    Like us on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/crtceng | Aimez-nous sur
    Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/crtcfra


    On 12/6/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:


    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Howard Maker <howard.maker@ccts-cprst.ca>
    > Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 15:06:47 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Attn John Lawford Look at the photos hereto
    > attached
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > I am out of the office, returning on December 9, 2019. I will reply to
    > your message as soon as possible.
    >
    > Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 9 decembre 2019.  Je r?ponderai ?
    > votre message d?s que possible.
    >
    >
    >
    > https://www.ccts-cprst.ca/35-increase-complaints-filed-telecom-tv-customers/
    >
    > CCTS releases latest data in Annual Report
    >
    > Ottawa (November 28, 2019) – The Commission for Complaints for
    > Telecom-television Services (CCTS) reports today that it concluded its
    > 2018-19 year having received nearly 19,300 complaints from Canadian
    > telecom and TV customers, an all-time high in the organization’s
    > twelve-year history.
    >
    > Canadians complained most often about their wireless service, followed
    > in order by internet, TV and local phone services. Billing issues were
    > the predominant irritant for customers, followed by issues related to
    > the disclosure of important information about their service.
    >
    > Bell’s share of all complaints declined in 2018-19 from 33% to 30%
    > (almost 5,900). Rogers’ share also declined from 10% to 9% (just over
    > 1,800). TELUS’ share increased by 1.5% to 8% (the number of TELUS
    > complaints jumped by 71% to just over 1,600).
    >
    > The CCTS also reports a 42% increase in the number of service provider
    > violations of the Wireless Code. The most common Code violations
    > involved the failure to provide important documentation to customers
    > and to provide proper notice before disconnection of service. There
    > were only 3 breaches of the Television Service Provider Code.
    >
    > On January 31, 2020, the CCTS will begin to administer a fourth code
    > of conduct, the Internet Code, which was issued by the Canadian
    > Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) earlier this
    > year. The new Code will apply to large internet service providers and
    > is intended to make it easier for customers to understand service
    > contracts, plan prices and promotions, and help prevent bill shock.
    >
    > “Record numbers of complaints, rapid industry change, and our own
    > desire for continuous improvement have motivated us to focus on our
    > dispute resolution process, and we’re looking at ways to improve our
    > service to make it more efficient, effective and transparent,” said
    > Howard Maker, CCTS’ Commissioner and CEO. “Our goal is to ensure that
    > we continue to provide a service that’s easy for consumers and service
    > providers to use, that resolves disputes promptly and fairly, and
    > provides valuable insight into the specific challenges faced by
    > consumers.”
    >
    > Despite the increasing number of complaints, the CCTS continues to
    > successfully resolve over 90% of complaints.
    >
    > Customers who are unable to resolve an issue directly with their
    > telecom or TV service provider can file their complaint online for
    > free at ccts-cprst.ca.
    > About the CCTS
    >
    > We are Canada’s national and independent organization dedicated to
    > resolving customer complaints about telecommunications and television
    > services, fairly and free of charge. This includes billing errors,
    > compliance with contract terms and commitments, service delivery,
    > credit management and collections issues. Let’s talk solutions!
    > Contact
    >
    > 613-688-3283 | Toll free: 1-855-512-9783 | communications@ccts-cprst.ca
    >
    >
    > https://www.xplornet.com/about/news/5g-is-coming-to-rural-new-brunswick-a-lot-sooner-than-you-think/
    >
    >
    > 5G is Coming to Rural New Brunswick a Lot Sooner Than You Think
    >
    > July 25, 2019
    >
    > St. Martins, NB – Major upgrades are on the way: over 83,000 rural
    > homes and businesses in New Brunswick will soon have access to the
    > latest 5G-ready Internet technology capable of providing dramatically
    > faster Internet services with unlimited data.
    >
    > Xplornet President and CEO Allison Lenehan today joined
    > representatives of the Government of Canada and the Province of New
    > Brunswick to confirm that the province will see a major upgrade to its
    > rural broadband network, positioning New Brunswick as a leader in
    > access to future 5G services.
    >
    > This project will see Xplornet Communications Inc., Canada’s leading
    > rural broadband provider and a proudly New Brunswick-based company,
    > install or enable up to 3,000 km of fibre optic cable. Along with
    > upgrades to hundreds of sites, this investment will enable the latest
    > wireless technology to deliver future 5G services, while bringing
    > speeds of 100 Megabits per second (Mbps) and unlimited data downloads
    > to rural communities in New Brunswick.
    >
    > “At Xplornet, we focus on enabling rural Canadians to stay connected
    > to what matters, at ever faster speeds, regardless of where they
    > choose to live,” said Allison Lenehan, President and CEO of Xplornet.
    > “Today’s announcement is the next step in our plan to continue
    > evolving and improving Internet service in rural New Brunswick by
    > deploying the latest 5G-ready technology in our home Province.”
    >
    > Xplornet will invest $80 million to deliver this critical broadband
    > infrastructure project to rural New Brunswickers. This investment is
    > enabled by a $40 million contribution from the Government of Canada,
    > via the Rural and Northern Infrastructure Communities Stream of the
    > Investing in Canada infrastructure plan. The total cost of the project
    > is $120 million.
    >
    > “We are grateful to the Government of Canada and the Province of New
    > Brunswick for supporting rural communities by investing in broadband,”
    > said Mr. Lenehan. “We know customers want reliable, fast Internet
    > connections – whether for keeping up with work, or keeping in touch
    > with loved ones. All of us at Xplornet are excited to get this project
    > started, to make better Internet service available to our customers,
    > and our home Province.”
    >
    > -30-
    >
    > About Xplornet Communications Inc.
    >
    > Headquartered in Woodstock, New Brunswick, Xplornet Communications
    > Inc. is one of Canada’s leading broadband service providers.  For over
    > a decade, Xplornet has been providing innovative broadband solutions
    > to rural customers at work, home and play across Canada.  Today,
    > Xplornet offers voice and data communication services through its
    > unique wireless and satellite network that connects Canadians to what
    > matters.
    >
    > For inquiries, please contact:
    >
    > James Maunder
    > Vice President, Public Affairs and Communications
    > james.maunder@corp.xplornet.com
    >
    >
    > Xplornet Responds to Industry Canada’s Spectrum Auction Announcement
    >
    > April 5, 2012
    >
    > MARKHAM, ON, March 15, 2012 /CNW/ – John Maduri, CEO of Xplornet
    > Communications Inc., Canada’s leading provider of rural broadband,
    > responded today to Industry Canada’s announcement of proposed changes
    > to foreign ownership and spectrum auction rules.  Overall, Xplornet is
    > conditionally supportive of the direction of the proposed changes.
    > “Industry Canada has responded to a wide range of complex issues and
    > diverse interests around foreign investment and spectrum rules in a
    > fair and balanced way,” said Maduri today.  However, Xplornet remains
    > disappointed that spectrum auctions will continue to be biased towards
    > urban mobile providers and against providers of rural broadband.  “To
    > acquire spectrum for rural use, bidders would be required to buy urban
    > areas.  This prices many rural broadband providers out of the spectrum
    > market and slows expansion of broadband to rural Canadians,” said
    > Maduri.
    >
    > Xplornet looks forward to participating in the upcoming auctions.
    > However, Xplornet believes that 700 MHz alone will not be able to meet
    > the growing capacity needs of broadband users.  “Our strongest
    > recommendation to Industry Canada is to advance, as quickly as
    > possible, the 2.5 GHz auction.  Every delay making this spectrum
    > available slows the development and improvement of broadband networks
    > for all Canadians.  We sincerely hope Minister Paradis makes
    > expediting this auction a major priority,” concluded Maduri.
    >
    > About Xplornet Communications Inc.
    > Headquartered in Woodstock, New Brunswick, Xplornet Communications
    > Inc. (formerly Barrett Xplore Inc.) is Canada’s leading rural
    > broadband provider.  We believe everyone should have access to the
    > transformative benefits of broadband, so we make our service available
    > everywhere in Canada, including the hard to reach places.  We overcome
    > the challenges of Canada’s vast geography through our deployment of
    > Canada’s first national 4G network, which leverages both
    > fixed-wireless towers on the ground and next-generation satellites in
    > space.  Our customers live in the farthest reaches of the country and
    > just outside of major urban centres, and through our coast-to-coast
    > network of local dealers we connect them to all that the Internet
    > offers.  Xplornet is high-speed Internet – for all of Canada.
    >
    > xplornet.com | twitter.com/xplornet | facebook.com/xplornet
    >
    > For further information:
    >
    > Media Inquiries:
    > Morten Paulsen
    > 403.399.3377
    > morten@paulsengroup.ca
    >
    >
    > On 12/6/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2019/lt190221.htm
    >>
    >> Filing Information with the Commission
    >>
    >> The requested information is to be filed with the Commission by 4
    >> March 2019 (10 days). Any other interested party may file a response
    >> by 11 March 2019 (5 days). The Council may reply to any comments no
    >> later than 18 March 2019 (5 days). All filings are to be provided to
    >> all persons copied within this letter.
    >>
    >> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/big-telcos-hike-internet-prices-amid.html
    >>
    >> Sunday, 20 January 2019
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Big telcos hike internet prices amid soaring demand, revenues
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
    >>
    >> Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
    >>
    >> Methinks Ms Harris should review the documents I sent her in 2002
    >> before she says too much more about the big company that owns her
    >> journalistic competition N'esy Pas?
    >>
    >> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/big-telcos-hike-internet-prices-amid.html
    >>
    >>
    >> #nbpoli #cdnpoli
    >>
    >> https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/bell-telus-shaw-internet-price-hike-1.4984489
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Big telcos hike internet prices amid soaring demand, revenues
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> 1212 Comments
    >> Commenting is now closed for this story.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David R. Amos
    >>
    >>
    >> Content disabled.
    >> David R. Amos Methinks some folks may enjoy reading a portion of a
    >> comment I made as I ran in the election of the 42nd Parliament N'esy
    >> Pas?
    >>
    >> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
    >>
    >>
    >>   ----- Original Message -----
    >>   From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
    >>   To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
    >>   Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
    >>   Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:28 AM
    >>   Subject: RE: I am curious
    >>
    >>   Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is
    >>   no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the
    >>   documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the
    >>   process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it
    >>   in my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We
    >>   will then provide you with a reply.
    >>
    >>   Martine Turcotte
    >>   Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
    >>   BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
    >>   1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
    >>   Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
    >>
    >>   Tel: (514) 870-4637
    >>   Fax: (514) 870-4877
    >>   email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
    >>
    >>   Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
    >>   Tel: (514) 870-4638
    >>   email: diane.valade@bell.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> A copy of this letter and all related correspondence will be added to
    >> the public record of the proceeding.
    >>
    >> If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me
    >> at (613) 697-4027 or megan.maloney@crtc.gc.ca.
    >>
    >> In the meantime, the Commission is currently continuing its review of
    >> this costs application.
    >>
    >> Yours Sincerely,
    >>
    >> originally signed by
    >>
    >> Megan Maloney
    >> Legal Counsel
    >>
    >> PIAC Welcomes New Board Members
    >>
    >> Adds Expertise in Telecommunications, Broadcasting and Class Actions
    >>
    >> OTTAWA – The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC), today announced
    >> the recent election of four new directors to its Board, all experts in
    >> either telecommunications, broadcasting or class actions:
    >>
    >>      Konrad von Finckenstein is a lawyer and consultant based in
    >> Ottawa. He was previously Chair of the Canadian Radio-television and
    >> Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), an Honourable Justice of the
    >> Federal Court of Canada and the Commissioner of Competition at the
    >> Competition Bureau of Canada. In addition, he has held senior posts in
    >> the Government of Canada in positions related to international trade,
    >> telecommunications, competition and electronic commerce. Mr. von
    >> Finckenstein has been elected as PIAC’s Chair of the Board.
    >>      Suzanne Lamarre is a lawyer and engineer with the firm of
    >> Therrien, Couture and is a former Commissioner of the CRTC. Maitre
    >> Lamarre works in the areas of telecommunications, radiocommunications
    >> and broadcasting law as a strategic advisor on regulatory and
    >> governmental matters at both the national and international level.
    >>      Monica Auer is a lawyer and the Executive Director of Canada’s
    >> Forum for Research & Policy in Communications (FRPC), a non-partisan
    >> organization focused on Canada’s communications system. She previously
    >> worked at the CRTC and the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC).
    >> Ms. Auer has been elected as PIAC’s Vice-Chair.
    >>      Jonathan Schachter is a Toronto based lawyer with Sotos LLP, with
    >> his practice areas including class actions, consumer protection
    >> litigation, competition and price fixing, privacy litigation,
    >> professional liability litigation, and trademarks and intellectual
    >> property litigation and arbitration.
    >>
    >> “PIAC’s extensive work on behalf of consumers before the CRTC requires
    >> the utmost guidance and insight,” said John Lawford, Executive
    >> Director and General Counsel of PIAC.  “We are therefore thrilled to
    >> add to our Board persons with unparalleled experience to guide our
    >> communications advocacy, as well as an expert in consumer class
    >> actions as this sector becomes more litigious,” he added.
    >>
    >> PIAC is a federally incorporated not-for-profit and registered charity
    >> that advocates for consumer interests, and in particular vulnerable
    >> consumer interests, in the provision of important public services.
    >> PIAC is known for its representation of consumer, low-income and
    >> seniors groups before the CRTC, arguing for better services, more
    >> choice and consumer protection for customers of Internet, wireless,
    >> telephone and broadcasting services.
    >>
    >> For more information, please contact:
    >>
    >> John Lawford
    >> Executive Director and General Counsel
    >> Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC)
    >> (613) 562-4002 ×25
    >>
    >> jlawford@piac.ca
    >>
    >>
    >> David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:30:37 -0400 (EDT)
    >> From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Attn John Lawford Look at the photos hereto attached
    >> To: coyne@deborahcoyne.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
    >> From: David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
    >> Subject: Attn John Lawford Look at the photos hereto attached
    >> To: piac@piac.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:30:41 -0400 (EDT)
    >> From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you
    >> lawyer call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: email@stephentaylor.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:02:27 -0400 (EDT)
    >> From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you
    >> lawyer call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: ca-abuse@cc.yahoo-inc.com, abuse@yahoo.com, chobson@yahoo-inc.com,
    >> coombss@fleishman.com, finnegan@yahoo-inc.com,
    >> suneel.khanna@publishing.rogers.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com
    >> CC: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 15:01:16 -0400 (EDT)
    >> From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you
    >> lawyer call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: politics@clc-ctc.ca, anti-racism&hr@clc-ctc.ca, sectreas@clc-ctc.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Raymond Amos <davidramos333@yahoo.ca> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:43:04 -0400 (EDT)
    >> From: David Raymond Amos < davidramos333@yahoo.ca>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you
    >> lawyer call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: susan.harris@emera.com
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you
    >> lawyer call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: jtanguay@m-x.ca, communications@m-x.ca , boxmoc@bostonoptions.com,
    >> boxr@bostonoptions.com, barbarapike@aims.ca, brianleecrowley@aims.ca,
    >> george.cooper@mcinnescooper.com, nbbox@ps.gc.ca, peibox@ps.gc.ca ,
    >> nsbox@ps.gc.ca, Len.Leriche@ps.gc.ca, DICK.ISABELLE@gnb.ca,
    >> Marc.Leger@gnb.ca, Corey.Akerley@gnb.ca
    >> CC: bbixby@burnslev.com, lgold@burnslev.com, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca,
    >> press@royalcollection.org.uk, Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca ,
    >> moore.r@parl.gc.ca, bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
    >> jchretien@heenan.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca,
    >> Casey.B@parl.gc.ca, Arthur.A@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.L@parl.gc.ca,
    >> milliken@petermilliken.org, ciec-ccie@parl.gc.ca , Bagnell.L@parl.gc.ca,
    >> Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, duffy@ctv.ca, DannyWilliams@gov.nl.ca,
    >> checkup@cbc.ca, louiselorefice@ndp.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
    >> oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca,
    >> gypsy-blog@hotmail.com , spinks08@hotmail.com,
    >> lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca,
    >> T.J.Burke@gnb.ca
    >>
    >>    I caught you money dudes in Montreal peeking at me today.
    >>
    >> Just Dave
    >> By Location > Visit Detail
    >> Visit 2,118            [>>]    Domain Name     (Unknown)     IP
    >> Address     205.205.155.# (Bourse de Montreal)    ISP     Metrix
    >> Interlink    Location             Continent   :   North America
    >> Country   :   Canada  (Facts)    State/Region   :   Quebec    City   :
    >> Montral    Lat/Long   :   45.5, -73.5833 (Map)    Language
    >> French (Canada)
    >> fr-ca    Operating System     Microsoft WinXP    Browser     Internet
    >> Explorer 6.0
    >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)    Javascript
    >>    version 1.3    Monitor             Resolution   :   1024 x 768
    >> Color Depth   :   32 bits     Time of Visit     Sep 18 2007 11:23:41
    >> am    Last Page View     Sep 18 2007 11:34:40 am    Visit Length
    >> 10 minutes 59 seconds    Page Views     4    Referring URL
    >> http://search.yahoo....i=UTF-8&vc=&fp_ip=CA     Search Engine
    >> search.yahoo.com    Search Words    "david amos" whistleblower
    >> securities    Visit Entry Page
    >> http://davidamos.blo...-stewart-and-me.html    Visit Exit Page
    >> http://davidamos.blo...rles-leblanc_23.html     Out Click
    >> http://briefcase.yahoo.com/motomaniac_02186
    >> http://briefcase.yah...com/motomaniac_02186    Time Zone     UTC-5:00
    >> Visitor's Time     Sep 18 2007 10:23:41 am    Visit Number     2,118
    >>
    >> Rest assured that you were not alone. Other beancounting dudes in
    >> Quebec are worried too. N'est Pas? I spotted them before I called you.
    >>
    >> Just Dave
    >> By Location > Visit Detail
    >> Visit 2,115          [<<]  [>>]    Domain Name     gc.ca ? (Canada)
    >> IP Address     198.103.61.# (Finance Canada and Treasury Board
    >> Secretariat)    ISP     GTIS    Location             Continent   :
    >> North America    Country   :   Canada  (Facts)    State/Region   :
    >> Quebec    City   :   Templeton    Lat/Long   :   45.4833, -75.6 (Map)
    >> Language     English (Canada)
    >> en-ca    Operating System     Microsoft Win2000    Browser
    >> Internet Explorer 6.0
    >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; CRTC; .NET CLR
    >> 1.1.4322)    Javascript     version 1.3    Monitor
    >> Resolution   :   800 x 600    Color Depth   :   32 bits     Time of
    >> Visit     Sep 18 2007 9:40:46 am    Last Page View     Sep 18 2007
    >> 9:40:46 am    Visit Length     0 seconds    Page Views     1
    >> Referring URL     http://www.google.ca...&hl=en&start=20&sa=N    Search
    >> Engine    google.ca    Search Words    betty macphee    Visit Entry
    >> Page     http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html    Visit Exit
    >> Page     http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html    Out Click
    >>     Time Zone     UTC-5:00    Visitor's Time     Sep 18 2007 8:40:46
    >> am    Visit Number     2,115
    >>
    >>
    >> However we should not overlook some Maritimers who were not so happy
    >> on the very day Danny Boy Williams has his buddy Eddy drop the writ so
    >> he could get reelected in a bigtime fashion.
    >>
    >>           Just Dave
    >> By Location > Visit Detail
    >> Visit 2,104          [<<]  [>>]    Domain Name     (Unknown)     IP
    >> Address     209.128.31.# (Aliant Telecom)    ISP     Aliant Telecom
    >> Location             Continent   :   North America    Country   :
    >> Canada  (Facts)    State/Region   :   Newfoundland    City   :   Happy
    >> Valley    Lat/Long   :   53.3, -60.3 (Map)    Language     English
    >> (U.S.)
    >> en-us    Operating System     Microsoft WinXP    Browser     Internet
    >> Explorer 6.0
    >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
    >> 1.1.4322 )    Javascript     version 1.3    Monitor
    >> Resolution   :   1280 x 720    Color Depth   :   32 bits     Time of
    >> Visit     Sep 17 2007 11:42:49 am    Last Page View     Sep 17 2007
    >> 11:42:49 am    Visit Length     0 seconds    Page Views     1
    >> Referring URL        Visit Entry Page
    >> http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html    Visit Exit Page
    >> http://davidamos.blo...3/ides-of-march.html    Out Click          Time
    >> Zone     UTC-4:00    Visitor's Time     Sep 17 2007 12:12:49 pm
    >> Visit Number     2,104
    >>
    >>
    >> Lets not forget the crooks down under the 49th or their buddies way down
    >> under
    >>
    >>
    >> Just Dave
    >> By Location > Visit Detail
    >> Visit 2,080          [<<]  [>>]    Domain Name     lightship.net ?
    >> (Network)    IP Address     216.204.42.# (Dynagraf)    ISP
    >> Lightship Telecom, LLC    Location             Continent   :   North
    >> America    Country   :   United States  (Facts)    State   :
    >> Massachusetts    City   :   Canton    Lat/Long   :   42.1847, -71.122
    >> (Map)    Language     English (U.S.)
    >> en-us    Operating System     Microsoft WinXP    Browser     Internet
    >> Explorer 6.0
    >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)    Javascript
    >>    version 1.3    Monitor             Resolution   :   800 x 600
    >> Color Depth   :   32 bits     Time of Visit     Sep 15 2007 1:52:19 am
    >>    Last Page View     Sep 15 2007 1:52:19 am    Visit Length     0
    >> seconds    Page Views     1    Referring URL
    >> http://www.google.co...hl=en&start=130&sa=N    Search Engine
    >> google.com     Search Words    suffolk county sheriff cabral building
    >> regional lock up    Visit Entry Page
    >> http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html    Visit Exit Page
    >> http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html    Out Click          Time
    >> Zone     UTC-5:00    Visitor's Time     Sep 15 2007 12:52:19 am
    >> Visit Number     2,080
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Just Dave
    >> By Location > Visit Detail
    >> Visit 2,092          [<<]  [>>]    Domain Name     netspace.net.au ?
    >> (Australia)    IP Address     203.33.165.# (Netspace)    ISP
    >> Netspace    Location             Continent   :   Oceania/Australasia
    >> Country   :   Australia  (Facts)    State/Region   :   New South
    >> Wales    City   :   Sydney    Lat/Long   :   -33.8833, 151.2167 (Map)
    >> Language     English (Australia)
    >> en-au    Operating System     Microsoft WinXP    Browser     Internet
    >> Explorer 7.0
    >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322;
    >> .NET CLR 2.0.50727 ; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30)    Javascript     version
    >> 1.3    Monitor             Resolution   :   1024 x 768    Color Depth
    >> :   32 bits     Time of Visit     Sep 16 2007 12:17:38 am    Last
    >> Page View     Sep 16 2007 12:17:38 am    Visit Length     0 seconds
    >> Page Views     1    Referring URL
    >> http://www.blogger.com/profile/7645241    Visit Entry Page
    >> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/     Visit Exit Page
    >> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/    Out Click          Time Zone
    >> UTC+9:00    Visitor's Time     Sep 16 2007 1:17:38 pm    Visit Number
    >>    2,092
    >>
    >>
    >>      FYI. I took an interest in the Monteal Exchange for several
    >> reasons today. First because of the crossborder doings of the liberal
    >> government in New Brunswick in which my G.A.L..'s law firm partner Mr.
    >> Gold is involved. Second is the CRTC hearings in Montreal (Do you know
    >> who the fed Betty MacPhee and the lawyer, Martine Turcotte are?).
    >> Third my research of what Frank Quattone and his old Bank in Beantown
    >> is up to these days. (After I contacted his lawyers and he was
    >> mysteriously released from jail, he made a very strange promise to the
    >> FEDs indeed. All my bells and whistles went off)  Last but not least
    >> the results of the byelections in Quebec last night caused every
    >> politcal animal in Canada worth his sand to rear his ugly head. Now
    >> that every piltical wardog and moneyman political wardog smells
    >> another Federal election coming, it is highttime that I pounce as
    >> well. N'est Pas?
    >>
    >>     In case you are wondering, here is the link to your document that
    >> caused me to call you dudes in Montreal Exchange this morning.
    >>
    >> http://www.m-x.ca/f_circulaires_en/016-05_en.pdf
    >>
    >>      May I suggest that you people print the attachments within this
    >> and the following emails and have your lawyers study them closely.
    >> Failing that, you should at least listen to some of the attachments in
    >> the other emails to assure yourselves that I am a very serious
    >> Maritimer who does not like to be lied to and laughed at by people who
    >> should know better.
    >>
    >>        It seems that I must prove to you dudes within Bourse de
    >> Montréal Inc. that I am a very quick study in order to get past your
    >> assistants that claim everybody is in a meeting. You have no idea how
    >> many times I have heard that bullshit over the course of the past six
    >> years. Simply put, I will put up with that nonsense no more. So I
    >> called you dudes back and managed to speak to a lawyer who claimed her
    >> name was Hanh Ly. She obviously was not in a meeting as Jacques
    >> Tanguay's assistant had claimed a moment earlier. EH? Ms. Ly claimed
    >> that she was too busy to talk to me or look my name up on her computer
    >> because she was dealing with some kind of emergency. So I simply told
    >> her that I my concerns may become a somewhat bigger issue in short
    >> order and that I would mention our little pow to  her bosses. she was
    >> not long finding me on the Internet then EH?
    >>
    >>       That said I began my little study of your outfit as well. I
    >> quickly saw that I have crossed paths with some of your Directors
    >> byway of their other occupations. Thus there is no need to send you
    >> dudes at Bourse de Montréal Inc. Hard Copy of my material at this
    >> point in time. I should give you some time to respond to these emails
    >> just in case you may wish to act ethically ASAP in the best interests
    >> of all. Methinks that the only onus on me at this point in time is
    >> prove byway of this email and the ones to follow that what I am the
    >> man I told your lawyers I was and prove that I made contact with you
    >> N'est Pas?
    >>
    >>       Never forget Frank Quattone and Martha Stewart both went to a
    >> Yankee jail partly because of minor evidence found within just one
    >> email. More importantly to my clan and I,  is the fact that I was
    >> falsely imprisoned in the USA after running for a seat in the 38th
    >> Parliament merely because I had sent emails proving what I said about
    >> many wrongs is true.
    >>
    >>       Part of my little study of you dudes caused me to take a far
    >> greater interest in the Boston Options Exchange Group LLC (BOX because
    >> of Luc Bertrand and Philippe Loumeau claimed association with it. i
    >> had never heard of them before so I took and interesta and called
    >> (866) 768-8845. I managed to talk to Nick Losurdo a very new lawyer
    >> who just got a job with BOX. As soon as he could see that he was in
    >> way over his head, he very quickly tried to falsely claim that I was
    >> threatening him in someway. That said we very quickly resovoled that I
    >> was not and I told him where he could begin to query the Yankee
    >> dockets in his neck of the woods in order to study my work and  act in
    >> the best interests of BOX.  I am very accustomed nasty lawyers and
    >> their bullshit false allegations as you will soon see. The malice of
    >> liars/lawyers is expected, the obvious question I must ask is why will
    >> nobody else act within the scope of their employment as they play with
    >> other people's money?
    >>
    >>      Whereas Barbara Pike of AIMS called me back yesterday just to
    >> call me a lair, I will send her nasty little Institute in the
    >> Maritimes once again byway of her and her not so long departed and
    >> soon to be back boss, Brian Lee Crowley what you Dudes in Montreal are
    >> about to receive. Lets just say that she really pissed me off.
    >> Everybody knows I hate it when Maritmers go out of their way to screw
    >> Maritimers for the benefit of Yankees and the publicly held
    >> corporations that they own way out west in Stevey Boy Harper's
    >> stomping grounds.
    >>
    >> http://www.aims.ca/aboutaims.asp?cmPageID=337
    >>
    >>      Her own bragging about her former positions should suggest that
    >> she do her homework before pissing off a political animal EH? Methinks
    >> that she should have talked to her directors and advisors such as
    >> Brian Lee Crowley Peter LougheedJohn C. Crosbie, John F. Irving, Norm
    >> Miller George Cooper a senior partner in the Atlantic Canadian law
    >> firm of McInnes Cooper first. N'est Pas Georgey Boy?
    >>
    >>
    >> Just Dave
    >> By Location > Visit Detail
    >> Visit 2,061          [<<]  [>>]    Domain Name     corridor.ns.ca ?
    >> (Canada)    IP Address     64.5.219.# (Bell Canada)    ISP     Bell
    >> Canada    Location             Continent   :   North America
    >> Country   :   Canada  (Facts)    State/Region   :   Nova Scotia
    >> City   :   Halifax    Lat/Long   :   44.65, -63.6 (Map)    Language
    >> English (U.S.)
    >> en-us    Operating System     Microsoft WinXP    Browser     Internet
    >> Explorer 6.0
    >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
    >> 1.1.4322)    Javascript     version 1.3    Monitor
    >> Resolution   :   800 x 600    Color Depth   :   32 bits     Time of
    >> Visit     Sep 14 2007 10:27:54 am    Last Page View     Sep 14 2007
    >> 10:41:17 am    Visit Length     13 minutes 23 seconds    Page Views
    >> 2    Referring URL    http://www.blogger.com/profile/7645241     Visit
    >> Entry Page     http://davidamos.blogspot.com/    Visit Exit Page
    >> http://davidamos.blo...04/just-dave_22.html     Out Click     View my
    >> complete profile
    >> http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609     Time Zone     UTC-4:00
    >> Visitor's Time     Sep 14 2007 10:27:54 am    Visit Number     2,061
    >>
    >>
    >> Just Dave
    >> By Location > Visit Detail
    >> Visit 2,062          [<<]  [>>]    Domain Name     cciw.ca ? (Canada)
    >> IP Address     198.73.130.# (JD IRVING LIMITED)    ISP     JD IRVING
    >> LIMITED    Location             Continent   :   North America
    >> Country   :   Canada  (Facts)    State/Region   :   New Brunswick
    >> City   :   Saint John    Lat/Long   :   45.2667, -66.0667 (Map)
    >> Language     English ( U.S.)
    >> en-us    Operating System     Microsoft WinXP    Browser     Firefox
    >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.6)
    >> Gecko/20070725 Firefox/2.0.0.6    Javascript     version 1.5
    >> Monitor             Resolution   :   1280 x 1024    Color Depth   :
    >> 32 bits     Time of Visit     Sep 14 2007 11:06:35 am    Last Page
    >> View     Sep 14 2007 11:06:48 am    Visit Length     13 seconds
    >> Page Views     1    Referring URL        Visit Entry Page
    >> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/    Visit Exit Page
    >> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/    Out Click     View my complete
    >> profile
    >> http://www.blogger.c...15428735081915360609     Time Zone     UTC-4:00
    >> Visitor's Time     Sep 14 2007 11:06:35 am    Visit Number     2,062
    >>
    >>      Th Yankee lawyer that BOX employs must know of my Clan's
    >> malevolent court appointed trustee James McLaughlin and heard of my
    >> G.A.L  Brian Bixby who McLaughlin had appointed for his benefit not
    >> mine. Nick lives to close to McLaughlin not to.  N'est Pas? You dudes
    >> in Montreal must know Bixby's law firm partner Leornard Gold. He
    >> maintains and office in Montreal in order to assist him in helping
    >> ot6her Yankees to screw Maritimers Correct? Ask that Yankee crook who
    >> the hell I am if you don't believe me. His partner nasty partner Bixby
    >> was appointed by a Probate Court against my will and well paid to
    >> protect the interests of my children both living and unborn. Bixby has
    >> failed to return my phone calls or answer one email or letter as he
    >> biled his riduculous fees to our interests. That profoundly corrupt
    >> Yankee lawyer failed miserably in regards to my little Clan's futures
    >> years ago. In fact he did not even make an appearance until just after
    >> his federal Attorney General
    >>
    >> Ashcroft flew to Canada to talk to Wayne Easter and they came up with
    >> a new plan to be rid of me. But the plans of mice and men and crooked
    >> politicans don't always work out so well. N'est Pas?
    >>
    >> Four years later I still ain't in jail and I am still acting in the
    >> best interest of all
    >> of my children and yours to this very day even if none of you are
    >> willing to do so.
    >>
    >>                                         Veritas Vincit
    >>                                              David Raymond Amos
    >>
    >> Say Hoka Hey to these Yankee lawyers will ya? I see that I succeeded
    >> my ex lawyer shitcanned from his old law firm EH Bixby? Perhaps you
    >> should call him back now EH Yankee?
    >>
    >> Barry Alden Bachrach
    >> The Law Office of Barry Bachrach
    >> 62 Paxton Street
    >> Leicester MA 01524
    >> Admitted to the bar on 1983-01-19
    >> 508-892-1533
    >>
    >>
    >> Nicholas James Losurdo
    >> 7 Deerfield Lane
    >> Natick MA 01760
    >> 508-561-2662
    >> Admitted to the bar on 2006-11-30
    >>
    >> Leonard M Gold & Brian D Bixby
    >> Burns&Levinson LLP
    >> 125 Summer Street
    >> Boston MA 02110
    >> 617-345-3831
    >> Admitted to the bar on 1981-12-23
    >>
    >>
    >>     Leonard M. Gold  Partner  Office Phone: 617.345.3831
    >> Alternate Phone: 514.989.3151
    >> Location: Boston, MA
    >> Send an email
    >> Download Vcard
    >>
    >> Practice:
    >>    Chairman, Canada Practice
    >>    Bankruptcy
    >>    Corporate
    >>    Finance
    >>    International Practice
    >>    Life Sciences
    >> Bar Admissions:
    >> Massachusetts, New York
    >> Experience:  Leonard M. Gold is the Managing Director of Burns &
    >> Levinson Canada Co. and a Partner in Burns & Levinson LLP. He provides
    >> cross-border assistance to Canadian companies seeking to develop
    >> operations in the United States and to American companies wishing to
    >> establish a presence in Canada. He has lectured to Canadian
    >> entrepreneurs on doing business in the United States, including
    >> accessing the financial market and corporate formation. Mr. Gold also
    >> works with trade organizations in both countries to facilitate trade
    >> missions.
    >> Prior to joining Burns & Levinson Canada he was a principal in the
    >> law firm of Lakin, Solomon & Gold, P.A and was Vice President,
    >> Financial Institutions and Government Relations for the Canadian
    >> consulting entity of Gabel International. In both these roles, Mr.
    >> Gold was instrumental in organizing seminars, workshops and
    >> conferences that facilitated the introduction of U.S. businesses to
    >> investment opportunities in Canada.
    >> In addition to his U.S./Canada relations practice, he has extensive
    >> experience in the practice of bankruptcy and insolvency. He has
    >> special expertise in assisting multinational companies on the impact
    >> of United States bankruptcy law, with emphasis on Canada.
    >> Memberships:
    >>    Board of Directors of NECBC (New England Canada Business Council)
    >>    Boston Bar Association
    >> Education:
    >>    LL.M. degree, Washington University School of Law
    >>    J.D. degree, Hofstra University School of Law
    >>    B.A., Clark University
    >> Quotes:
    >>    5/20/2007, The Telegraph Journal - Plenty of room at top of the
    >> e-health market for province
    >> Mr. Gold was quoted in this article in regards to his role as a
    >> 'corporate cupid' for connecting Canadian companies with U.S. venture
    >> capital firms.
    >>    3/15/2007, The Telegraph Journal - N.B. Eyes Financial Pipeline to
    >> Venture Capital in U.S.
    >> Mr. Gold was featured in this article for his role as a 'corporate
    >> cupid' for Canadian companies.
    >>    3/31/2006, Montral Gazette - Corporate Cupid
    >> Leonard Gold and Burns & Levinson LLP were featured in this article by
    >> Mike King. The article was about the success of our Canadian
    >> operations and the Pipeline events Mr. Gold and the Firm have been
    >> running.
    >>    11/24/2005, The Montreal Gazette - "Strictly Legal"
    >> Len was quoted in this article by Sarah Dougherty regarding the
    >> Pipeline events he coordinates each year, where pre-selected Canadian
    >> companies are brought to Boston for one-on-one meetings with venture
    >> capitalists. "It's not just the money, but the strategic connections
    >> VCs have to offer," Gold said.
    >>
    >>     Brian D. Bixby  Partner  Office Phone: 617.345.3360
    >> Location: Boston, MA
    >> Send an email
    >> Download Vcard
    >>
    >> Practice:
    >>    Chairman, Probate & Trust Litigation
    >>    Divorce & Family
    >>    Trusts & Estates
    >> Bar Admissions:
    >> Massachusetts
    >> Experience:  Brian Bixby is Co-Chair of the Firm's Private Clients
    >> Group. He concentrates his practice on all aspects of estate planning;
    >> fiduciary administration; probate court litigation: petitions,
    >> complaints, appeals, family law, guardianships, and conservatorships;
    >> and representation of trustees, executors, and beneficiaries.
    >>
    >> Mr. Bixby came to Burns & Levinson in 1996 from his former firm of
    >> Cuddy Bixby, where he directed the trusts and estates and family law
    >> practices. He previously specialized in those areas of law at Ropes &
    >> Gray.
    >>
    >> Mr. Bixby has written and spoken extensively for the Massachusetts
    >> Bar Association, Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc., and
    >> the National Business Institute, Inc. Most recently he co-authored
    >> such publications as Fiduciary Litigation in the Probate Court, Estate
    >> Planning for Incapacitated Persons in the Probate Court, Problem Areas
    >> in Probate Planning and Administration, Litigating Will Contests and
    >> Accounts, and How to Handle a Will Contest. He has served on numerous
    >> committees and subcommittees of the American, Massachusetts, and
    >> Boston Bar Associations, and lectures frequently throughout
    >> Massachusetts.
    >> Memberships:
    >>    American Bar Association, member of the Section of Real Property,
    >> Probate and Trust Law
    >>    American College of Trust and Estate Counsel, Fellow and member of
    >> Fiduciary Litigation Committee 2007 - 2008.
    >>    Boston Bar Association, Member of the Probate Committee
    >>    Boston Estate Planning Council
    >>    Boston Probate Forum, steering committee (2007 - 2010)
    >>    Massachusetts Bar Association, Member of the Probate Law Section
    >> Council, Chairperson of the Probate Litigation Practice Group as well
    >> as Chair of the Taxation Law Section Council (2007 - 2008)
    >>    Northeastern University School of Law Alumni/ae Association, Board
    >> of Directors
    >> Additional Information:
    >>    Mr. Bixby is President for the Massachusetts Family and Probate Inn
    >> of Court.
    >>    Mr. Bixby was a U.S. Delegate for the XII International Congress on
    >> Family Law (Havana, Cuba, 2002)
    >>    Mr. Bixby was appointed to the Fee Arbitration Board of the
    >> Massachusetts Bar Association (2003)
    >> Education:
    >>    J.D., Northeastern University School of Law, 1977
    >>    A.B., Brown University, 1974
    >> Awards:
    >>    Mr. Bixby was selected as a Massachusetts SuperLawyer in 2004, 2005
    >> and 2006. The selection is based on a survey of Massachusetts
    >> attorneys and reviewed by an independent blue ribbon panel. Listed
    >> attorneys and finalists consist of the top 5% of attorneys in
    >> Massachusetts. The polling is conducted by Massachusetts SuperLawyers
    >> and Law & Politics Media. Mr. Bixby was also listed as one of the Top
    >> 100 Massachusetts SuperLawyers in 2004.
    >> Quotes:
    >>    4/28/2006, Investor's Business Daily - How to Cope with a Pension
    >> Cutback
    >> Brian Bixby was quoted in this article by Kirk Shinkle.
    >>    3/1/2006, Sky Radio - Sky Radio Interview with Brian D. Bixby on
    >> Estate Planning
    >> Interview broadcast on American Airlines flights in March 2006.
    >>    6/27/2005, Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly - "The Producers"
    >> Brian Bixby was featured in the article by Tony Wright. Brian, along
    >> with three other top Boston Attorneys are mentioned for their
    >> dedication and hard work to their practices.
    >>    6/13/2005, Fox News 25 - TV Interview: Joan Kennedy Case
    >> Brian Bixby was interviewed by Fox News 25 regarding the Joan Kennedy
    >> case.
    >>
    >> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you
    >> lawyer call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: ott@minbuza.nl
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you
    >> lawyer call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: mail@mongolembassy.org
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 08:16:27 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you
    >> lawyer call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: leonard.edwards@international.gc.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Look at the photos hereto attached before you or you lawyer
    >> call me a liar Mr. Reed
    >> To: dreed@franklintempleton.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 19:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: dmcguinty.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org, ogilvie.john@gmail.com,
    >> cornwall@theinquiry.ca, gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org,
    >> keith.neuman@environics.ca, info@familycoalitionparty.com,
    >> iurquha@thestar.ca, ep523@freenet.carleton.ca, sapelbaum@trebnet.com,
    >> info@libertarian.on.ca , amercer@libertarian.on.ca, alanjmercer@yahoo.ca,
    >> treasurer@libertarian.on.ca , jcxxr@yahoo.com, rogerfrazer@yahoo.com,
    >> 4321as@canada.com, pwcuff@yahoo.com , zgh@trixnet.com,
    >> madzia_hanebach@hotmail.com, paolof@libertarian.on.ca,
    >> canudiggit1@yahoo.ca, frankrandolphscott@yahoo.ca, john@adlib.ca,
    >> anniesunsky@netscape.net , mgobin@libertarians.ca, ra@ra1.net,
    >> brucejlk@gmail.com, extraheath99@rogers.com
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 16:49:24 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: ogilvie.john@gmail.com , orakwa@paulcomm.ca, Kahentinetha2@yahoo.com,
    >> Brian.Heslip@ontario.ca, Brandy.Winter@ontario.ca,
    >> mkwinter.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org, donvalleywest@johntory.ca,
    >> dbrown@dwpv.com, kathleen@kathleenwynne.ca, doherty@kos.net,
    >> teamlogan@hotmail.com, greenwoodspeers@hotmail.com, rlm@xplornet.com,
    >> mark@thesharksite.com, oneail2007@gmail.com, brmckenzie@hotmail.com,
    >> GPBrown@Rogers.com, paul_simas@yahoo.ca, awalker@franklintempleton.ca,
    >> champeda@bellnet.ca, devin.kelly4@gmail.com, candidate@benpolley.ca ,
    >> djsmith@interhop.net, pormond@gpo.ca, raydartsch@sympatico.ca,
    >> vserda@bmts.com, jojo@gokenora.com, campaign@trifonhaitas.com,
    >> info@votefrankdejong.ca , ron.yurick@gmail.com, djanuczkowski@primus.ca,
    >> lawcaroline@yahoo.com, bhaines@rogers.com, daniel_cjds@yahoo.ca,
    >> sgoel@rogers.com, ted@brantgreenontario.ca, jolleys@rogers.com,
    >> timw@mightytrans.com, crc@colincarmichael.ca, kbell@ciaccess.com,
    >> rrosefrei@sympatico.ca, info@nqwgreens.ca, marion_schaffer@yahoo.com,
    >> mcpj@resist.ca
    >> CC: info@marijaminic.ca, spagnotta@greenparty.ca, mijco@hotmail.com,
    >> tzetter@epnn.com, doughfanderson@sympatico.ca, russell@pass-it-on.ca,
    >> patrick.kraemer@rogers.com , mraegard@hotmail.com,
    >> lhelferty@sympatico.ca,
    >> fixit4u@sympatico.ca, wvarcoe@gpo.ca, ekennedy@glen-net.ca,
    >> mark@appleseedlawn.com, lizcouture@hotmail.com , bsmith@ncys.ca,
    >> timidgreen@gmail.com, back.motion@on.aibn.com, Ward40@gmail.com,
    >> glennkitchen@sympatico.ca, stefandixon@yahoo.com,
    >> peterellis1000@hotmail.com , larkilander@cogeco.ca,
    >> miriamstucky@gmail.com, ampayne@wightman.ca, vote.greenparty@hotmail.com,
    >> redpointer2003@yahoo.ca, tom.syl@xplornet.com, mhyde@gpo.ca,
    >> Leonardo7@ncf.ca, JFord@ottawasouthgreens.ca, manoussi@magma.ca,
    >> djohnston@gpo.ca, gordonkubanek@storm.ca, mullen.melanie@gmail.com,
    >> twilley@isys.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>   Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 01:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: bamyot@heenan.ca , johnh@cba.org, info@cba.org, sjakab@bcsc.bc.ca,
    >> jmoffat@talisman-energy.com , cslusarchuk@mccarthy.ca,
    >> wendy.king@weyerhaeuser.com, g_goodwin@ducks.ca, rodea@johnson.ca,
    >> john.hope@dal.ca, srosentz@cmhc-schl.gc.ca, bdwylynko@fedex.com,
    >> natalie.lecavalier@le-cavalier.com, bwerry@regina.ca,
    >> skuppek@ccca-cba.org, jgj@aikins.com, dkcarroll@chcbarristers.com,
    >> wonchulenko@ltgg.ca, jpmaccarthy@rlr-law.com, jesse@bccla.org,
    >> jennifer.warren@cibc.com, freethinkersclub@shaw.ca,
    >> Kahentinetha2@yahoo.com, robb.costello@fredericton.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: Gregory.Corbett@gnb.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: cmhafo@unb.aibn.com.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 11:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: oconng@parl.gc.ca, mp@gordonoconnor.ca, 90006@ute.sei.org,
    >> Tania.Hache@ccra-adrc.g.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 14:11:30 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: gkquinn@gov.pe.ca , jamcmillan@gov.pe.ca, dpobrien@gov.pe.ca,
    >> jrdiamond@gov.pe.ca, llgoulden@gov.pe.ca, delarter@gov.pe.ca,
    >> vamoore@gov.pe.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:57:35 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: gnpalmer@edu.pe.ca, cynthiadunsford@gmail.com, cldunsford@gov.pe.ca,
    >> rwjghiz@gov.pe.ca, gigreenan@edu.pe.ca, pgbinns@gov.pe.ca,
    >> omcrane@gov.pe.ca, jdbagnall@gov.pe.ca, wjsheridan@gov.pe.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: gypsy-blog@hotmail.com
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 10:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: mike.ferguson@gnb.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >> Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 21:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
    >> From: David Amos < motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: Fw: A Storm delayed Valentine for the Yankee Depupty Dog
    >> Robert F. O'Meara and his Fed cohorts in two countries.
    >> To: tonie.chaltas@hillandknowlton.ca
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> David Amos <...
    >>
    >> [Message clipped]
    >>
    >



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 07:33:01 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: YO Melanie Joly and Pablo Rodriguez Methinks Steven
    Guilbeault, his buddy Catherine Tait and all your former nasty minions
    in CBC must take courses on playing dumb N'esy Pas?
    To: legermedia@gmail.com, "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
    "wayne.easter"<wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
    < sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "Sean.Fraser"
    < Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Newsroom
    < Newsroom@globeandmail.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:16:53 -0300
    Subject: YO Melanie Joly ans Pablo Rodriguez Methinks Steven
    Guilbeault, his buddy Catherine Tait and all your former nasty minions
    in CBC must take courses on playing dumb N'esy Pas?
    To: "Melanie.Joly"<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>,
    Steven.Guilbeault@parl.gc.ca, "pablo.rodriguez"
    < pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
    < darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
    < barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
    < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
    < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
    prmibullrun@gmail.com, "Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
    "Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
    RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca, smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca, Norman Traversy
    < traversy.n@gmail.com>, CabalCookies <cabalcookies@protonmail.com>,
    El.Jones@msvu.ca, tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "steve.murphy"
    < steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, kevin.leahy@pps-spp.gc.ca,
    Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>,
    AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com, "Bill.Blair"
    < Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "kevin.leahy"
    < kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca>, lagenomai4@protonmail.com,
    mlaritcey@bellaliant.com, mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com,
    toryrushtonmla@bellaliant.com, kelly@kellyregan.ca,
    mla_assistant@alanapaon.com, stephenmcneil@ns.aliantzinc.ca, PREMIER
    < PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, info@hughmackay.ca, pictoueastamanda@gmail.com,
    markfurey.mla@eastlink.ca, claudiachendermla@gmail.com,
    FinanceMinister@novascotia.ca, "Bill.Morneau"
    < Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm
    < pm@pm.gc.ca>, istayhealthy8@gmail.com, prmi@eastlink.ca,
    "PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, "Katie.Telford"
    < Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html


    I waited all day to hear this nonsense


    https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1769780803841


    Sound Off: Deciphering the shift to a public inquiry of the Nova
    Scotia mass shooting

        2 hours ago
        News
        3:19

    Moving forward with a public inquiry may provide relief for some, but
    many questions remain. Jean Laroche and Michael Gorman decipher the
    politics of the decision.


    ---------- Original message ----------
     From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:09:14 -0300
     Subject: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." What a
     difference a day makes EH? Notice CBC ain't talking about this yet?
     To: "darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
     <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
     <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
     <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>
     Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, prmibullrun@gmail.com,
     "Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson"
     <Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>



    ----------Origiinal message ----------
    From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:04:25 +0000
    Subject: RE: YO Bill.Blair Now that a full Public Inquiry is in order
    Methinks people such as Anne McLellan, Ralph Goodale Leanne Fitch,
    Allan Carroll, Mark Furey and YOU should testify under oath N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    comments.
    Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
    any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
    on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
    Government of Canada website at
    www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
    calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

    Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
    Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
    En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
    que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
    Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
    économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
    le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
    www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
    composant le
    1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.




    ----------Origiinal message ----------
    From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
    Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:04:54 +0000
    Subject: Automatic Reply
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
    confirmation your message has been received.

    We recognize that Nova Scotians have concerns about novel coronavirus
    (COVID-19). If you are looking for up-to-date information, we
    encourage you to visit:
    novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/> or
    canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
    call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.

    If you are experiencing symptoms, please use the COVID-19 online
    self-assessment, which can be found here:
    https://when-to-call-about-covid19.novascotia.ca/en

    On April 18th and 19th, our province experienced an unimaginable
    tragedy, in already difficult times.

    To share your condolences, please visit StrongerTogetherNS on
    Facebook, or by sending them to
    condolences@novascotia.ca<mailto:condolences@novascotia.ca>.

    To contribute to the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, created in
    partnership with the Canadian Red Cross, visit redcross.ca and search
    for the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, or call 1-800-418-1111.

    Kind Regards,

    Premier’s Correspondence Team


     ----------Origiinal message ----------
     From: Peter Mac Isaac <prmibullrun@gmail.com>
     Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:42:20 -0300
     Subject: Re: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." Methinks
    it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by the Pierre Elliott
     Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

     A lot of info to chew on - every now and then we win one - Today we
     won a partial victory when the provincial liberals threw the federal
     liberals under the bus forcing their hand . Now the spin will be to
     get a judge they can control.

     > On Jul 28, 2020, at 6:48 PM, David Amos
    < david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
     >
     > BTW I inserted a lot more info in this blog
     >
     > https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/independent-panel-slap-in-face-says.html
     >
     >
     > https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/province-house/protesters-decry-shocking-and-paternalistic-decision-to-hold-review-not-inquiry-into-nova-scotia-mass-shooting/
     >
     >
     > Protesters decry ‘shocking and paternalistic’ decision to hold review,
     > not inquiry into Nova Scotia mass shooting
     > July 27, 2020 By Yvette d'Entremont
     >
     > Gathered at Victoria Park in Halifax at noon Monday for a general
     > strike intended to draw attention to demands for a public inquiry into
     > the Nova Scotia mass killing.
     >
     > The event was slated to run from noon to 12:22, a 22-minute strike to
     > pay homage to the 22 people whose lives were taken during the weekend
     > of April 18-19.
     >
     > “This is something that all sectors of society have asked for,” Martha
     > Paynter, founder and coordinator of Women’s Wellness Within, told
     > reporters before the event started.
     >
     > Her organization works for reproductive justice, prison abolition and
     > health equity. It was one of several feminist community activist and
     > advocacy groups behind Monday’s ‘Strike back: Demand an inquiry’
    > event."
     >
     >
     >
     > https://marthapaynter.ca/
     >
     >
     > ‘Strike back: Demand an inquiry’ event." is a registered nurse
     > providing abortion and postpartum care. She is a Doctoral Candidate in
     > Nursing at Dalhousie University. She is the founder and coordinator of
     > Women’s Wellness Within, a non-profit organization supporting
     > criminalized women and transgender/nonbinary individuals in the
     > perinatal period in carceral institutions and the community. She works
     > to advance reproductive justice through advocacy, collaboration and
     > nursing scholarship.
     >
     > For her nursing advocacy and research, Martha has received numerous
     > awards including  the 2018 Rising Star Award from the Canadian
     > Association of Perinatal and Women’s Health Nurses, the 2018 Health
     > Advocacy Award from the Council of the College of Registered Nurses of
     > Nova Scotia, the 2018 3M National Student Fellowship, and in 2017, the
     > Senate of Canada Sesquicentennial Medal for volunteer service to the
     > country.
     >
     > Martha’s doctoral research is supported by the Pierre Elliott Trudeau
     > Foundation, CIHR Banting-Best Canadian Doctoral Scholarship, the
     > Killam Predoctoral Scholarship, the Canadian Nurses Foundation,
     > Dalhousie University and the IWK Health Centre"
     >
     >
     >
     > ---------- Original message ----------
     > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
     > Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 11:29:02 -0400
     > Subject: Attn El Jones I just called and left a message saying
    Iiked your style
     > To: El.Jones@msvu.ca, tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "steve.murphy"
     > <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
     > Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
     >
     > https://www.halifaxexaminer.ca/featured/prisons-refugees-cats/#3.%20Fight%20me%20over%20cat%20names
     >
     > Prisons, Refugees, Cats
     >
     > August 5, 2018 By El Jones
     >
     > Martha Paynter was driving through New Brunswick this weekend and
     > texted me that she saw a billboard for the Airbnb in the old
     > Dorchester Jail.
     >
     > Among the attractions listed on the website are that it was the site
     > of the last double hanging in New Brunswick (more on that in a
     > moment), with a highlight being that guests can stay in the former
     > cells.
     >
     > tim@halifaxexaminer.ca
     >
     > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayro4wYzckg&t=64s
     >
     > El Jones - Judges
     > 1,107 views
     > el jones
     > Published on May 25, 2016
     >
     > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V7y0IkmSVTc
     >
     > Canada is So Polite - El Jones
     > 2,895 views
     > Janice Jo Lee
     > Published on Jan 25, 2018
     >
     >


    Melanie Joly vs Hubby Lacroix.pdf
    29K View as HTMLScan and download

     


    ----Oiginal Message -----
    From: David Amos
    To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; andre <andre@jafaust.com>; andremurraynow <andremurraynow@gmail.com>; "mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.com"<mcknight.gisele@dailygleaner.com>; mclaughlin.heather <mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>
    Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 2:09 PM
    Subject: Too Too Funny

    Friday, January 18, 2013

    So-called Journalist Don Macpherson and the Daily Gleaner declares war against the Blogger!!!!!

    litigantIMG_8179_edited

    I wanted to blogged this issue weeks ago but I was distracted by other matters.

    I was VERY surprised when someone bought this story to my attention.

    So-called Irving Journalist Don MacPherson from the Daily Gleaner called me a  " LITIGANT "


     donmacpherson1


    Which I'm not sure what this means but It's sorta calling a person a low life or something like that?

    I quickly email a letter to the Editor but Gisele McKnight refused my letter to the Editor explaining to the readers that I wasn't " A Litigant "

    So? The Irvings decided to declare war against the Blogger?

    I accept their challange.

    In the old days, I would just write a letter to the Atlantic Press Council and the issue would be taken care of but that don't exist anymore.

    Get ready for some Blogs against the Staff and ESPECIALLY so called Journalist Don Macpherson because this National Enquirer Style of Journalism must be confronted and put to a stop!

    The Public must not allow a Newspapers call the Citizens names and they are not allowed to reply to their story.

     IMGP7457


    This issue could be have been resolve but Gisele McKnight <  Editor of Letters to the Editor > refuse to post my concerns.

    Get ready for many Blogs against the Irving's Papers during the next few months!!!

    If Don MacPherson wants to play games? I love games!!!!


    justiceinnewbrunswick


    Sigh.....all this could have been settle with a letter to the editor!!!

    Truly stay tuned!!!

    18 comments:

    Anonymous said...
    Did it ever occur to you to look up the definition of the word?

    A LITIGANT is simply someone engaged in legal action.

    Might want to look up the word IDIOT while you're at it!
    7:54 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    "Sigh.....all this could have been settle with a letter to the editor!!! "

    Sigh.....all this could have been settle with a dictionary or a basic junior high level education!!!
    7:56 AM, January 18, 2013
    Charles LeBlanc said...
    So? The word is a complement and not an insult?

    One more thing...if i LOOK FOR THE WORD Coward Jerkface?

    I should find your name right idiot?

    :P
    7:58 AM, January 18, 2013
    Scott Agnew said...
    My name is Scott Agnew Charles. Do with it what you want and call me any names you please. Fact remains, I'm not the one who declared war on a person and organization based on my own lack of understanding of the English language and inability to even bother to look in a dictionary when I don know the meaning of a word.

    Nope, no need to inform yourself. just go with the tried and true, in your face, ignorant and misinformed Charles Leblanc style.
    8:03 AM, January 18, 2013
    Charles LeBlanc said...
    What???? You're still around??

    I remember you?

    You were the coward I was suppose to meet at tim years ago but you never showed up!!!

    Yes...Scott Agnew < strange name > you are the cowards of all cowards.

    I taught Jamie Irving fired you years ago!!!
    8:07 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    charles you and scott agnew seem to be having a lovers spat.lmao


    JAG
    9:22 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/litigant

    Litigant is simply someone involved in a lawsuit. It is neither a compliment nor an insult. It is simply a descriptive word.

    Calm down and use some common sense before you fly off the handle. If you find a word you don't know/understand simply look it up. You obviously have access to the Internet and a wealth of web sites that provide dictionary services.
    9:24 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    The word litigant is pretty broad, this should help in understanding the meaning and the context.

    litigant n. any party to a lawsuit. This means plaintiff, defendant, petitioner, respondent, cross-complainant, and cross-defendant, but not a witness or attorney.


    litigant noun adversary, adverse party, appellant, appellee, claimant, complainant, contender, contestant, controversialist, correspondent, defendant, disputant, intervenor, legal adverrary, legal opponent, litigationist, litigator, opponent, opponent in a lawsuit, party, party to a lawsuit, party to a legal action, party to a proceeding, party to a suit, party to an action, party to legal proceeding, petitioner, plaintiff, suitor, the defense.

    Redneck Comment --> Don Macpherson should do something about his above average weight because of the additional health care cost that is associated with obesity health related issues, which can be just as costly as it is for smokers. F@#kin smokers.
    9:27 AM, January 18, 2013
    Charles LeBlanc said...
    I don't believe so because Don MacPherson always used this word as negative in his report to the Irvings...
    9:28 AM, January 18, 2013
    mikel said...
    I agree, Charles knows how to use the internet, so look it up-especially before writing a letter to the editor about it!

    As the above poster points out, a litigant is somebody involved in a LAWSUIT-meaning civil court. So Charles is right to be upset, because he has NEVER been involved in a lawsuit. I don't see why it means a 'low life' or anything like that, but its not the proper term for what Charles was (is?).

    So while you are belittling charles and calling him an idiot for not knowing what the term means, and not looking it up, just keep in mind that there is another person who fits that description, and he works as a reporter for the only print media in the province.

    Which puts them on about an equal footing when it comes to news.
    9:39 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    Mikel,

    I'm aware of several community newspapers that the Irving's dont own in this province.

    Plus anyone can start a print media anytime they want.
    10:19 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    The Gleaner has reported self represented litigants very negatively recently and has not provided any balanced reporting on the issue of members of the public representing themselves in court, so Charles is right to take this as a negative comment about him. and Mikel is right - Charles did not "choose" to go to court for charges against him. He had no choice and when lawyers bail you have to keep going.
    10:48 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    MacPherson used "Litigant" which means you're involved in lawsuits (or legal matters)

    What I think Charles is confusing it with is "Litigious", which means you are "unreasonably prone to go to law to settle disputes."

    Although they are similar, there's a big difference between the two, how they are used and what they mean.
    10:48 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    He is using his newspaper for other reason than (just the facts) and putting him in with Andre Murray who has been denied any justice whatsoever and that's from a impartial viewpoint. This journalist is trying to put Charles in some sort of bad light light,like a disgruntled person with no point.

    What a pile O crap!
    11:35 AM, January 18, 2013
    mikel said...
    Anybody CAN, but that's irrelevant, and its pretty much the only print media of note, and certainly the only one in Fredericton (and that's really besides the point I think).
    11:37 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    The courts are getting hit with a wave of self represented people who dont have to follow court protocol and they are purposely frustrating people from further action.

    They put up low level crap judges like Clendenning as gate keepers on the bottom rung,then at the higher level chief justices pretend to care by nodding so nicely at the litigants all the while their shredding the case in their minds before the trials begun.
    11:42 AM, January 18, 2013
    Anonymous said...
    With the help of corrupt Irving press the courts are attacking self represented parties for many reasons, including that: members of the public can stand up in court and tell the truth on the record without lawyers there to misrepresent the facts, to show; to show people they "need" lawyers to "win" in court (to keep charging big fat fees) and to prevent justice to cover up the serious corruption in the "establishment" of New Brunswick and Fredericton. I notice the Irving press has never informed the public of the judges' duty to direct and assist the self-represented, written by Beverly McLachlin, Chief Justice of Canada and endorsed by the Canadian Judicial Council.
    12:24 PM, January 18, 2013
    André Faust said...
    Irving not only owns the major news papers but owns most of the major printing presses/shops in the province.

    So to try and produce your own paper you have to go out of province, but that takes time, by the time you send your layout flats, now day's is digital, the produce the paper and send it back the news is obsolete.

    Yes in theory you produce your own paper but practically highly unlikely.

    The other issue that happens if you try to produce your own news paper is advertisement to cover the cost of production. Irving has a very aggressive sales team, that as a small operator you can't compete with.

    If you think Irving is bad look at the SUN news network, Corporate Harper's own propaganda machine. Look at this connection here is old Kory Teneycke, who is currently vice-president of Sun News Network.Interestingly enough He was the former director of communications for the Canadian Prime Minister's Office.

    Lets turn the hand of clock back to 2010 for the CRTC licensing of Sun News. Konrad von Finckenstein (not Frankenstein) as Chair of the CRTC opposed the application, Harper forced him to his position as chair of the CRTC, as a Plum Harper offered him the position of ambassador. There is a lot more to this story as well, when you look at the backgrounds of the journalist working under the Suns banner, for example Ezra Levant, well known Sun Personality,, look at his background, Educated at the University of Calgary, where Harper was educated, was a key organizer for the reform party, advocated for the petroleum industry an has has declared to special interests groups such as aboriginal and bilingual groups. I could go through each the Suns media staff and for most show connections between Industry, Harper. the reform and the Conservative party. Enough said .. lol


    Contents
    1:25 PM, January 18, 2013

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:06:49 +0000
    Subject: RE: Kevin Lacey moved to Alberta to serve as a general duty
    constable with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Maskwacis but is
    not there anymore Correct?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-

    Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:06:53 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Kevin Lacey moved to Alberta to serve as a
    general duty constable with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in
    Maskwacis but is not there anymore Correct?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Merci encore pour votre courriel.



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:05:39 +0000
    Subject: Thank you for your email
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email to Premier Houston. This is an automatic
    confirmation your message has been received.

    As we are currently experiencing higher than normal volumes of
    correspondence, there may be delays in the response time for
    correspondence identified as requiring a response.

    We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
    you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
    to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnovascotia.ca%2Fcoronavirus%2F&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367672291%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=w%2BOsM5R7MFVxiqyjO2BAf6%2Bhyqwk%2FlhJgFPZiux%2FdlI%3D&reserved=0>
    or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcanada.ca%2Fcoronavirus&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367682286%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=VcH333SLZ540PWKlS5TJm0KVV0P8TdSq5MAG%2FwTfSV0%3D&reserved=0>.
    You can also call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.

    If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
    https://811.novascotia.ca<https://can01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2F811.novascotia.ca%2F&data=04%7C01%7CCathy.Williams%40novascotia.ca%7C7f853ddb9c444d16e82d08d993067f26%7C8eb23313ce754345a56a297a2412b4db%7C0%7C0%7C637702478367692284%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=0EfyFucV6pzKpjejXy0yxg1gQGxY%2BycmQ5AH9gF0VqU%3D&reserved=0>/
    and use the COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you
    determine if you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet
    access, call 811.

    Thank you,

    Premier’s Correspondence Team



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:05:38 +0000
    Subject: Thank you for your email
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
    of the Premier.

    We appreciate the time you have taken to write.

    NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has
    reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
    e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
    Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.

    Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
    professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
    strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
    distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
    vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
    électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
    copie. Merci de votre cooperation.




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 16:05:34 -0300
    Subject: Kevin Lacey moved to Alberta to serve as a general duty
    constable with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Maskwacis but is
    not there anymore Correct?
    To: "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    Kevin.Lacey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "Michelle.Boutin"
    <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Brenda.Lucki"
    <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
    <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier
    <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Office of the
    Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
    <premier@gnb.ca>

    https://www.taxpayer.com/about/spokespeople/kevin-lacey

     

     

     https://www.taxpayer.com/media/LaceyKevin_AHP1333.jpg

    Kevin Lacey

    Alberta Director

    Phone:
    780-722-1749

    Email:
    klacey@taxpayer.com

    Kevin signed on as Alberta director in 2021 for his second tour of duty with the Canadian Taxpayers Federation.

    Kevin initially served as the Atlantic Director. He was a frequent contributor to public policy debates on CTV, CBC, Global News and talk radio. His commentaries appeared in local and national newspapers, including the National Post and Globe and Mail.

    Before that, Kevin spent about 15 years working in government and politics. He ran has own public affairs consulting business and served in the Office of the Prime Minister of Canada and Office of the Premier of Nova Scotia.

    He also acted as Interim President of Canadians for Affordable Energy, which advocated for changes to make Canadian energy more affordable.

    He moved to Alberta to serve as a general duty constable with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Maskwacis.

    Kevin was awarded the Queen’s Jubilee medal for his work with the Canadian Coalition for Victims Against Terror, a group of terrorist victims working to strengthen Canada’s anti-terror laws.

    In his spare, time Kevin coaches minor hockey.

     

    Royal Canadian Mounted Police 

    1 Mile Rd and Highway 611 E, 
    Samson Townsite, Maskwacis, 
    AB T0C 1N0

     
     
     

    Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

    Kevin.Lacey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

    The email address you entered couldn't be found. Please check the recipient's email address and try to resend the message. If the problem continues, please contact your email admin.
     
     
     ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:50:04 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
    long memory and keep good records as well?
    To: media-medias@gnb.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
    briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca,
    jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca, francine.landry@gnb.ca,
    jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, benoit.bourque@gnb.ca, gilles.lepage@gnb.ca,
    "guy.arseneault"<guy.arseneault@gnb.ca>, daniel.guitard@gnb.ca,
    rene.legacy@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, isabelle.theriault@gnb.ca,
    eric.mallet@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart"
    <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
    <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
    <Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:31:18 +0000
    Subject: RE: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
    long memory and keep good records as well?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.


    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Bockus, Kathy (LEG)"<Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 15:31:19 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some
    folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    If your request is constituency related, please contact Gillian Scott
    at my Constituency office in St. Stephen at Gillian.Scott@gnb.ca or by
    phone at 506-466-1449.
    Thanks again for your email.
    ______

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
    Shelley McKeeman à mon bureau de circonscription à St. Stephen à
    Shelley.McKeeman@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506-466-1449.
    Merci encore pour votre courriel.



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 12:29:11 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
    long memory and keep good records as well?
    To: Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca, Margaret.Johnson@gnb.ca, Richard.Ames@gnb.ca,
    Jill.Green@gnb.ca, Ryan.Cullins@gnb.ca, Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca,
    Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca, Daniel.J.Allain@gnb.ca,
    Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, Greg.Turner@gnb.ca, maryewilsonMLA@outlook.com,
    Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca, Bruce.Fitch@gnb.ca,
    Kathy.Bockus@gnb.ca, Arlene.Dunn@gnb.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca,
    Tammy.Scott-Wallace@gnb.ca, claude.williams@pcnb.ca, "Robert. Jones"
    <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, oldmaison
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andrea.johnson"
    <andrea.johnson@pcnb.org>, jenica.atwin@parl.gc.ca,
    dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>,
    Paul.D'Astous@gnb.ca, Louis.Leger@gnb.ca, cleveland.allaby@me.com,
    Nicolle.Carlin@gnb.ca, Francois.Robichaud@gnb.ca, "tyler.campbell"
    <tyler.campbell@gnb.ca>, "nick.brown"<nick.brown@gnb.ca>,
    shawn_morrison_1974@icloud.com, vtpca@xplornet.ca, duncan@dlmca.ca,
    andrewjdykeman@gmail.com, bobhatheway@gmail.com, lwyou1@rogers.com,
    francineqs@gmail.com, awlebrun@hotmail.com, jd.grant@rogers.com,
    ssducks@xplornet.ca, ilecwamh@hotmail.com, charlesdoucet850@gmail.com,
    rwillseely@gmail.com, stephan.richard1@gmail.com,
    slmaceachern@gmail.com
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca,
    "Roger.L.Melanson"<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
    <robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
     
     
    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/11/need-i-remind-marc-patrone-formerly-of.html

    Monday, 1 November 2021
    Need I remind Marc Patrone formerly of the CRTC and the RCMP that some
    folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Carr, Jeff Hon. (ELG/EGL)"<Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 11:31:39 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Lest we forget the Round 2 EUB Hearing for
    the "Not So Smart" Meters begins next week
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    If your request is Constituency related, please contact Rose Ann at my
    Constituency office in Fredericton Junction at RoseAnn.Smith@gnb.ca or
    by phone at 506-368-2938.
    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Si votre demande est liée à la circonscription, veuillez contacter
    Rose Ann à mon bureau de circonscription à Fredericton Junction à
    RoseAnn.Smith@gnb.ca ou par téléphone au 506-368-2938.
    Merci encore pour votre courriel.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:46:50 +0000
    Subject: RE: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a
    long memory and keep good records as well?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.


    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.


    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
    Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)"<Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:46:50 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some
    folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email.

    Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.

    If your concern is constituency related, please contact my
    constituency office assistant Janet by phone or email.
    janet.johnston@gnb.ca or 506-440-9542

    Thank you for taking the time to reach out to me with your questions
    or concerns.

    Sincerely,

    Kris Austin
    Leader-People's Alliance Party
    506-462-5875



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Kris Rondolo <krondolo@generationscrewed.ca
    >
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:44:27 -0700
    Subject: I have left Generation Screwed Re: Need I remind Higgy and
    Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as
    well?
    To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

    Hello,

    Thank you for your email.

    Unfortunately, I am no longer accessible via this email. I have left
    Generation Screwed effective May 28, 2021.

    To contact the Managing Director for the Canadian Taxpayers
    Federation's student programs and initiatives, including Generation
    Screwed, please send an email to Renaud Brossard at
    RBrossard@contribuables.ca.

    Thank you for patience, someone will be able to answer your email shortly.

    Sincerely,

    Kris Rondolo

    --

    Kristine T. Rondolo
    *Executive Director*
    Generation Screwed | Génération Sacrifiée
    E: krondolo@generationscrewed.ca | T: 1-613-981-8411

    [image: Image result for find us on facebook icon]
    <https://www.facebook.com/GenerationScrewed/>
    <https://www.instagram.com/genscrewedcdn/>
    <https://twitter.com/GenScrewedCdn>
    <https://www.linkedin.com/company/generation-screwed/about/>




    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 14:57:55 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Franco Terrazzano out of office Re: Need I remind Higgy
    and Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records
    as well?
    To: klacey@taxpayer.com, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, jcarpay
    <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "John.Williamson"<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Franco Terrazzano <fterrazzano@taxpayer.com>
    Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 10:44:27 -0700
    Subject: Franco Terrazzano out of office Re: Need I remind Higgy and
    Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as
    well?

    To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

    I am out of office until Thursday, please reach out to the CTF's
    Alberta Director Kevin Lacey for immediate assistance:
    klacey@taxpayer.com

    --

    *Franco Terrazzano*
    Federal Director
    Canadian Taxpayers Federation
    Phone | 403.918.3532

    [image: USE_StandUp_Logo_boxshape (small)]


    Get free e-mail updates <http://taxpayer.com/node/11193>

    Follow me on Twitter* @franco_nomics <https://twitter.com/franco_nomics>*



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Media Relations-PAB / Relation avec les médias-DGAP (CRA/ARC)"
    <cra-arc.media@cra-arc.gc.ca>
    Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:41:35 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Sylvie Gadoury RE KPMG etc Methinks CBC
    and the Justice Dept should know that I just got a call from John
    Williamson's office (613 995 5550) Perhaps somebody should ask my MP
    how that call concluded N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) Media
    Relations team. Our office hours are Monday to Friday between 9 a.m.
    and 5 p.m. (Eastern time).

    Please note that if you are not a news reporter, your email will not
    be addressed.

    You can write to the Minister
    here<https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/cjid/prot/ntr.action>.

    If you wish to speak with a CRA agent, please use the phone numbers below.

    1.             1-800-959-8281 (Individual tax enquiries)
    2.             1-800-387-1193 (Benefit enquiries)
    3.             1-800-959-5525 (Businesses and self-employed individuals)
    4.             1-613-940-8495 (if calling from outside Canada/USA)

    For other commonly used CRA phone numbers please visit our contact
    page.<https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/corporate/contact-information/telephone-numbers.html>

    For information on scams or to report deceptive telemarketing, contact
    the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre (CAFC) online at
    www.antifraudcentre.ca<http://www.antifraudcentre.ca/> or toll free at
    1-888-495-8501.

    If you believe you may be the victim of fraud or have given personal
    or financial information by mistake, contact your local police
    service. For more information, go to
    www.canada.ca/taxes-fraud-prevention<http://www.canada.ca/taxes-fraud-prevention>.

    ********************************************************************************************
    Merci d'avoir contacté l'équipe des Relations avec les Medias de
    l'Agence du revenu du Canada. Nos heures de service sont du lundi au
    vendredi, de 9 h à 17 h (heure de l'Est).

    Veuillez noter que si vous n’êtes pas un journaliste, votre courriel
    ne sera pas traité.

    Vous pouvez écrire à la ministre
    ici<https://apps.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/cjid/prot/ntr.action?request_locale=fr_CA>.

    Si vous souhaitez parler à un agent de l'Agence, composez l’un des
    numéros de téléphone suivant:

    1.             1-800-959-7383 (Impôt sur le revenu des particuliers)
    2.             1-800-387-1194 (Prestations fiscales)
    3.             1-800-959-7775 (Renseignments des entreprises)
    4.             1-613-940-8496 (Appels provenant de l'extérieur du Canada et É-U)

    Pour les autres numéros de téléphone courrant de l'Agence, veuillez
    consulter notre page de
    coordonnées<https://www.canada.ca/fr/agence-revenu/organisation/coordonnees/numeros-telephone.html>.

    Pour obtenir des informations sur les fraudes ou le télémarketing
    trompeur, contactez le Centre antifraude du Canada au
    www.centreantifraude.ca<http://www.centreantifraude.ca/> ou en
    composant le numéro sans frais 1-888-495-8501.

    Si vous croyez avoir été victime d'une fraude ou si vous avez fourni
    par erreur des renseignements personnels ou financiers, contactez
    votre service de police local. Pour plus de renseignements, consultez
    la page Protégez-vous contre la
    fraude<https://www.canada.ca/fr/agence-revenu/organisation/securite/protegez-vous-contre-fraude.html>.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Coon, David (LEG)"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>
    Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:40:04 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Sylvie Gadoury RE KPMG etc Methinks CBC
    and the Justice Dept should know that I just got a call from John
    Williamson's office (613 995 5550) Perhaps somebody should ask my MP
    how that call concluded N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. / Merci pour votre courriel.

    I am currently out of the office. I will be back on Monday, January
    6th. / Je suis hors du bureau.  Je serai de retour le lundi 6 janvier.

    I will respond as soon as possible.  / Je vous répondrai dès que possible.

    Please note that from December 23rd, 2019 until January 6th, 2020 the
    Constituency Office for Fredericton-South will be closed. Emails and
    telephone messages sent during this time will receive a response in
    early January. The office will re-open Monday, January 6th. /
    Veuillez noter que du 23 décembre 2019 au 6 janvier 2020, le bureau de
    circonscription de Fredericton-Sud sera fermé. Les courriels et les
    messages téléphoniques envoyés pendant cette période recevront une
    réponse au début de janvier. Le bureau ouvrira le lundi 6 janvier.

    If this is a media request for MLAs Megan Mitton or Kevin Arseneau or
    myself, please call (506) 429-2285. / Pour toute demande de médias
    avec les député.e.s Megan Mitton et Kevin Arseneau ou moi-même,
    veuillez appeler le (506) 429-2285.

    Have a safe and joyous holiday season! / Passez de joyeuses fêtes en
    toute sécurité !

    David Coon
    MLA Fredericton South & Leader of the Green Party/
    Député de Fredericton Sud et chef du Parti Vert


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Carr, Jeff Hon. (ELG/EGL)"<Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca>
    Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 21:40:03 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Sylvie Gadoury RE KPMG etc Methinks CBC
    and the Justice Dept should know that I just got a call from John
    Williamson's office (613 995 5550) Perhaps somebody should ask my MP
    how that call concluded N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    I will be away from the office until January 6th, 2020.

    Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 6 janvier 2020.
     
     

    Need I remind Higgy and Holland that some folks have a long memory and keep good records as well?

     
     
     
    Add star 

    David Amos

    <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    AttachmentMon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:44 PM
    To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca, marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca, krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com, jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca, leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com, pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com, prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie"<JPetrie@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John"<john.furey@mcinnescooper.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "howard.anglin"<howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson"<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>
     


     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:38:38 -0400
    Subject: Need I remind Higgy and Holland that the "Not So Smart" Meter
    hearing in the EUB begins on Monday?
    To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
    marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
    kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
    michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
    caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca,
    krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
    jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
    greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
    PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
    maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca,
    brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca,
    leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
    premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
    premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
    pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
    prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca,
    brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
    megan.mitton@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
    <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com>, votejohnw <votejohnw@gmail.com>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, john.mcneil@gnb.ca,
    jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
    <wharrison@nbpower.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 09:31:18 -0400
    Subject: Methinks the EUB and Johnny "Never Been Good" Herron in
    particular forgot that one Intervener had lots to say EH Mr Furey?
    To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
    marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
    kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
    michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
    caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca,
    krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
    jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
    greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
    PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
    maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca,
    brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca,
    leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
    premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
    premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
    pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
    prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca,
    brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
    megan.mitton@gnb.ca, BrianThomasMacdonald
    <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com>, votejohnw <votejohnw@gmail.com>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, john.mcneil@gnb.ca,
    jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
    <wharrison@nbpower.com>

    On 7/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: "Campbell, Tyler (ECO/BCE)"<Tyler.Campbell@gnb.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:30 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is
    > one of the emails I mentioned
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > I am currently out of the office and will be returning on July 22.
    >
    > From July 15 to 17, please contact Jason Humphrey for assistance at
    > jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca. For assistance on July 18 and 19, please
    > contact John McNeil at john.mcneil@gnb.ca.
    >
    > ***
    > Je suis actuellement hors du bureau et retournera le 22 Juillet.
    >
    > Du 15 au 17 juillet, veuillez contacter Jason Humphrey pour obtenir de
    > l'aide à l'adresse jason.humphrey2@gnb.ca. Pour obtenir de l'aide les
    > 18 et 19 juillet, veuillez contacter John McNeil à john.mcneil@gnb.ca.
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Legislative Assembly Office
    > <LegislativeAssemblyOffice@assembly.ab.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:33 +0000
    > Subject: RE: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is one of the
    > emails I mentioned
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Please note that due to an electoral boundary change in the 2019
    > Alberta election, this address is no longer valid or accepting email.
    > Please refer to the following web site to identify your new MLA and
    > constituency contact information.
    >
    > http://www.assembly.ab.ca/lao/mla/mla_help.htm
    >
    > Thank you
    >
    > Legislative Assembly Office
    >
    > [cid:image001.gif@01D4F058.1F3E4570]
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
    > <Premier@ontario.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 12:11:29 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Paige MacPherson I just called this is
    > one of the emails I mentioned
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
    > valued.
    >
    > You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    > reviewed and taken into consideration.
    >
    > There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    > need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    > correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    > response may take several business days.
    >
    > Thanks again for your email.
    > ______­­
    >
    > Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    > nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
    >
    > Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    > considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
    >
    > Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    > responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    > la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    > ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
    >
    > Merci encore pour votre courriel.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >> Début du message réexpédié :
    >>
    >> De: "Mitchell, Kathleen"<Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>
    >> Objet: Matter 430 - NB Power 2019-2020 General Rate Application / Instance
    >> Nº 430 - Énergie NB Demande générale de tarifs pour 2019-2020
    >> Date: 16 juillet 2019 08:44:00 UTC−3
    >> À: "david.sollows@gnb.ca"<david.sollows@gnb.ca>,
    >> "Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com"<Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com>,
    >> "dave.lavigne@enbridge.com"<dave.lavigne@enbridge.com>,
    >> "Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com"<Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com>,
    >> "jeffery.callaghan@mcinnescooper.com"
    >> <jeffery.callaghan@mcinnescooper.com>, "gerald@kissnb.com"
    >> <gerald@kissnb.com>, "cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com"
    >> <cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com>, "hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com"
    >> <hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com>, "lcozzarini@nbpower.com"
    >> <lcozzarini@nbpower.com>, "jfurey@nbpower.com"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
    >> "SWaycott@nbpower.com"<SWaycott@nbpower.com>, "NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com"
    >> <NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com>, "wharrison@nbpower.com"
    >> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "bcrawford@nbpower.com"<bcrawford@nbpower.com>,
    >> "NConnellyBosse@nbpower.com"<NConnellyBosse@nbpower.com>, "Lawton, John"
    >> <John.Lawton@nbeub.ca>, "Desmond, Ellen"<ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Dickie,
    >> Michael"<Michael.Dickie@nbeub.ca>, "Young, Dave"<Dave.Young@nbeub.ca>,
    >> "Mitchell, Kathleen"<Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>, NBEUB/CESPNB
    >> <General@nbeub.ca>, "heather.black@gnb.ca"<heather.black@gnb.ca>,
    >> "rdk@indecon.com"<rdk@indecon.com>, "rrichard@nb.aibn.com"
    >> <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>, "jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com"
    >> <jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com>, "dan.dionne@perth-andover.com"
    >> <dan.dionne@perth-andover.com>, "pierreroy@edmundston.ca"
    >> <pierreroy@edmundston.ca>, "ray.robinson@sjenergy.com"
    >> <ray.robinson@sjenergy.com>, "sstoll@airdberlis.com"
    >> <sstoll@airdberlis.com>, "pzarnett@bdrenergy.com"
    >> <pzarnett@bdrenergy.com>, "heather.quinn (heather.quinn@gnb.ca)"
    >> <heather.quinn@gnb.ca>, "bill.breckenridge@gnb.ca"
    >> <bill.breckenridge@gnb.ca>
    >>
    >> Good morning,
    >>
    >> Please note that the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board will be
    >> releasing the Decision in relation to the above noted Matter at 10:00 AM.
    >>
    >>
    >> Bonjour,
    >>
    >> Veuillez noter que la Commission de l'énergie et des services publics du
    >> Nouveau-Brunswick publiera la décision relative à l’instance susmentionnée
    >> à 10 h 00.
    >>
    >>
    >> Kathleen Mitchell
    >> Chief Clerk | Greffière en chef
    >>
    >> Energy & Utilities Board | Commission de l’énergie et des services publics
    >> du N.-B.
    >> 15 Market Square, Suite 1400
    >> Saint John, NB  E2L 4Y9
    >> 506-643-7324 (direct)
    >> 506-658-2504 (reception)
    >> Confidentiality Notice
    >> This private message (and any attachments) is for the exclusive use of the
    >> individual for whom, or entity for which, it is intended.  It may contain
    >> information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure by
    >> law.  Its author does not waive the protection afforded to it under
    >> applicable law. Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient
    >> does not constitute waiver of privilege.  Its possession or usage, by any
    >> person other than the one for whom it is intended, is not authorized by
    >> its author and is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this
    >> communication in error, please notify us immediately, at our expense, by
    >> telephone at (506) 658-2504.  Also, if you received this email in error,
    >> delete it and any attachments from your computer system and records. Thank
    >> you.
    >>  Avis de confidentialité
    >> Ce message privé (et toutes les pièces jointes) est à l'usage exclusif de
    >> la personne pour laquelle ou entité pour laquelle, il est destiné. Il peut
    >> contenir des informations qui sont personnelles, confidentielles ou
    >> exemptées de la divulgation par la loi.  Son auteur ne renonce pas à la
    >> protection accordée en vertu de la loi applicable.  Sa divulgation à toute
    >> personne autre que son destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de
    >> privilège. Sa possession ou l'utilisation, par une personne autre que
    >> celle pour laquelle il est destiné, n'est pas autorisée par son auteur et
    >> est strictement interdite.  Si vous recevez cette communication par
    >> erreur, veuillez nous appeler dans les plus brefs délais, à frais virés,
    >> au (506) 658-2504.  Aussi, si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur,
    >> veuillez effacer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre
    >> système informatique et de vos dossiers. Merci.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On 7/16/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> Paige MacPherson
    >> Atlantic Director
    >> Office Location: MAILING ADDRESS ONLY: 5201 Duke St PO Box 34077
    >> Scotia Square Halifax, NS B3J 1N0
    >> Phone: 902.717.7078 / TOLL FREE: 1.877.909.5757
    >> E-mail: pmacpherson@taxpayer.com
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:44:39 -0400
    >> Subject: Re: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must have noticed
    >> his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked bureaucrat Marc
    >> Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
    >> To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
    >> marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
    >> kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, serge.gauvin@snb.ca,
    >> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca,
    >> caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca,
    >> krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com,
    >> jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca,
    >> greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
    >> PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
    >> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca,
    >> brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca,
    >> leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
    >> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca,
    >> premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com,
    >> pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com,
    >> prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca,
    >> brian.gallant@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
    >> megan.mitton@gnb.ca
    >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
    >> <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com>, votejohnw <votejohnw@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "Gallant, Brian (LEG)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
    >> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:31:40 +0000
    >> Subject: RE: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must have noticed
    >> his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked bureaucrat Marc
    >> Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> Thank you for writing to the Leader of the Official Opposition of New
    >> Brunswick. Please be assured that your e-mail will be reviewed.
    >>
    >> If this is a media request, please forward your e-mail to
    >> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>. Thank you!
    >>
    >> ---
    >>
    >> Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
    >> officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
    >> sera examiné.
    >>
    >> Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
    >> ashley.beaudin@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>.  Merci!
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "Martin, Marc   (SNB)"<Marc.Martin@snb.ca>
    >> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 13:31:22 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Deputy Premier Robert Gauvin must
    >> have noticed his fellow SANB comedian the overpaid underworked
    >> bureaucrat Marc Martin at play in CBC again today N'esy Pas?
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Je serai absent du bureau le 8 janvier 2018. Pour des questions
    >> de traduction, veuillez communiquer avec Cindy Dempsey par téléphone
    >> au 444-2563 ou par courriel à l'adresse cindy.dempsey@snb.ca.
    >>
    >> I will be away from the office on January 8th, 2018. For
    >> translation-related questions, please contact Cindy Dempsey 444-2563
    >> ou par courriel à l'adresse cindy.dempsey@snb.ca.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:11:48 -0400
    >> Subject: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian Title people, the
    >> Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that I will figure out
    >> what a form 13a is.
    >> To: serge.gauvin@snb.ca, patrick.windle@snb.ca, "claude.poirier"
    >> <claude.poirier@snb.ca>, "john.mcnair"<john.mcnair@snb.ca>,
    >> Erin.Hardy@snb.ca, "alan.roy"<alan.roy@snb.ca>
    >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant"
    >> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
    >> MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, "serge.rousselle"
    >> <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca, "greg.byrne"
    >> <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca>,
    >> "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
    >> <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> Serge Gauvin
    >> Registrar General of Land Titles
    >> Called to the bar: 1995 (NB)
    >> Phone: 506-457-6933
    >> Fax: 506-444-3033
    >> Email: serge.gauvin@snb.ca
    >> Patrick V. Windle
    >> Deputy Registrar General of Land Titles
    >> Called to the bar: 1997 (NB)
    >> Email: patrick.windle@snb.ca
    >> Service New Brunswick
    >> Land Registry, 985 College Hill Rd.
    >> PO Box 1998, Stn. A
    >> Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5G4
    >>
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: "Auto-reply from kevhache@nb.aibn.com"<kevhache@nb.aibn.com>
    >> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 18:20:04 -0400
    >> Subject: Re: Too Funny I just talked to Claude Landry Elvy Robichaud’s
    >> old Chief of Staff He forgot what went down in 2004 and the emails I
    >> sent him since
    >> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    >>
    >> Bonjour
    >>
    >> Je serais absent du bureau du 6 aout au   22 aout inclusivement.  Le
    >> bureau sera fermé du 6 au 19 aout inclusivement pour les vacances d
    >> ete et sera ouvert a partir du 20 aout.  Bonne Vacance a tous
    >>
    >> Je retournerais votre courriel a mon retour.
    >>
    >> Kevin J. Hache
    >>
    >> CABINET KEVIN J. HACHE
    >> 8 Boul St-Pierre Ouest
    >> C.P. 5662
    >> Caraquet NB E1W 1B7
    >> 506 727 5150 (telephone)
    >> 506 727 6686 (telecopieur)
    >> kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
    >> Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
    >> my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
    >> tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
    >> as usual
    >> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>
    >> (Français à suivre)
    >>
    >> If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
    >> email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> Thank you.
    >>
    >> Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
    >> ‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca
    >>
    >> Merci.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
    >> Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
    >> to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
    >> David Lutz QC for me will ya?
    >> To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, John.McNair@snb.ca,
    >> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
    >> David.Eidt@gnb.ca
    >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
    >> Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:51:09 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Irving's ridiculous constitutional
    >> challenge and Federal Court File no T-1557-15 I wonder if George
    >> Cooper and Hélène Beaulieure even know how many times the Irvings and
    >> partners of their VERY snobby law firm have offended me over t...
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> I will be out of the office until October 30, 2017.  Je serai absent
    >> du bureau jusqu'au 30 octobre 2017.
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
    >> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
    >> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
    >> did she take all four copies?
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
    >> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
    >> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
    >> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
    >> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "McNair, John (SNB)"<John.McNair@snb.ca>
    >> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:29 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
    >> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> I will be out of the office August 1 - August 12. I will reply to your
    >> email when I return. If you require immediate assistance, please
    >> contact Chantal Leger at 663-2510. Thank you.
    >>
    >> Je serai absent du bureau les 1 aout - 12 aout. Je répondrai à votre
    >> courriel à mon retour. Si vous nécessitez de l'assistance
    >> immédiatement, veuillez contacter Chantal Leger au 663-2510. Merci.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)"<Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
    >> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:28 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
    >> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> Le francais suit:
    >>
    >> Hello,
    >>
    >> I am currently out of the office. I will gladly reply to your message
    >> upon my return on August 15, 2016. Should you require immediate
    >> assitance please contact Celeste Savoie at (506) 471-5290 or by email:
    >> Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
    >>
    >> Have a nice day!
    >>
    >> Bonjour,
    >>
    >> Je suis presentement hors du bureau. Il me fera plaisir de repondre a
    >> votre message a mon retour August 15, 2016. Si vous avez besoin d'une
    >> assitance immediate, veuillez communiquer avec Celeste Savoie au (506)
    >> 471-5290 ou par courriel a: Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.
    >>
    >> Bonne journee!
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
    >> Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:43:27 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My we just talked briefly Correct Ms
    >> Beaulieu? It appears to me that the latest President of the NB Law
    >> Society thinks non lawyers are not worth talking to
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> I will be out of the office until July 21, 2014. Je serai absent du
    >> bureau jusqu'au 21 juillet 2014.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
    >>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >>> To: coi@gnb.ca
    >>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>
    >>> Good Day Sir
    >>>
    >>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
    >>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
    >>>
    >>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
    >>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
    >>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
    >>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
    >>>
    >>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
    >>> suggested that you study closely.
    >>>
    >>> This is the docket in Federal Court
    >>>
    >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>>
    >>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
    >>>
    >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>>
    >>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>>
    >>> April 3rd, 2017
    >>>
    >>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
    >>>
    >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> The only hearing thus far
    >>>
    >>> May 24th, 2017
    >>>
    >>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
    >>>
    >>> Date: 20151223
    >>>
    >>> Docket: T-1557-15
    >>>
    >>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
    >>>
    >>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
    >>>
    >>> BETWEEN:
    >>>
    >>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >>>
    >>> Plaintiff
    >>>
    >>> and
    >>>
    >>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>>
    >>> Defendant
    >>>
    >>> ORDER
    >>>
    >>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
    >>> December 14, 2015)
    >>>
    >>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
    >>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
    >>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
    >>> in its entirety.
    >>>
    >>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
    >>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
    >>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
    >>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
    >>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
    >>> he stated:
    >>>
    >>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
    >>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
    >>> You are your brother’s keeper.
    >>>
    >>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
    >>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
    >>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
    >>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
    >>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
    >>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
    >>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
    >>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
    >>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
    >>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
    >>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
    >>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
    >>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
    >>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
    >>> Police.
    >>>
    >>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
    >>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
    >>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
    >>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
    >>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
    >>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
    >>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
    >>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
    >>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
    >>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
    >>> is no order as to costs.
    >>>
    >>> “B. Richard Bell”
    >>> Judge
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
    >>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
    >>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
    >>>
    >>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
    >>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
    >>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
    >>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
    >>>
    >>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
    >>> most
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
    >>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
    >>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
    >>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
    >>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
    >>> dudes are way past too late
    >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>
    >>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
    >>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >>>
    >>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
    >>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >>>
    >>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
    >>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >>>
    >>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
    >>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >>>
    >>> Thank you,
    >>>
    >>> Merci ,
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    >>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    >>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    >>> five years after he began his bragging:
    >>>
    >>> January 13, 2015
    >>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >>>
    >>> December 8, 2014
    >>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >>>
    >>> Friday, October 3, 2014
    >>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    >>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
    >>>
    >>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
    >>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
    >>>
    >>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
    >>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
    >>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
    >>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
    >>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
    >>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
    >>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
    >>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
    >>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
    >>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
    >>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
    >>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
    >>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
    >>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
    >>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
    >>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
    >>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
    >>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
    >>> campaign of 2006.
    >>>
    >>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
    >>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
    >>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
    >>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
    >>>
    >>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
    >>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
    >>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
    >>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
    >>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
    >>>
    >>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
    >>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
    >>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
    >>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
    >>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
    >>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
    >>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
    >>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
    >>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
    >>>
    >>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
    >>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
    >>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
    >>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
    >>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
    >>>
    >>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
    >>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
    >>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
    >>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
    >>>
    >>> Subject:
    >>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
    >>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
    >>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>>
    >>> January 30, 2007
    >>>
    >>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
    >>>
    >>> Mr. David Amos
    >>>
    >>> Dear Mr. Amos:
    >>>
    >>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
    >>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
    >>>
    >>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
    >>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
    >>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
    >>>
    >>> Sincerely,
    >>>
    >>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
    >>> Minister of Health
    >>>
    >>> CM/cb
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
    >>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
    >>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
    >>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
    >>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
    >>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
    >>>
    >>> Dear Mr. Amos,
    >>>
    >>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
    >>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
    >>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
    >>>
    >>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
    >>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
    >>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
    >>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
    >>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
    >>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
    >>>
    >>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
    >>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
    >>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
    >>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
    >>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
    >>>
    >>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
    >>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
    >>>
    >>>  Sincerely,
    >>>
    >>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
    >>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
    >>> Traffic Services NCO
    >>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
    >>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
    >>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
    >>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
    >>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
    >>> tel.: 506-457-7890
    >>> fax: 506-444-5224
    >>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
    >>>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
    >> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
    >> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
    >> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> Mr. Amos,
    >> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
    >> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
    >> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
    >> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
    >> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
    >> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
    >> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
    >>
    >> Department of Justice
    >>
    >> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
    >>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
    >>>
    >>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
    >>> ilian.html
    >>>
    >>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
    >>>>
    >>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
    >>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
    >>>>
    >>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
    >>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
    >>>> cards?
    >>>>
    >>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
    >>>> 6
    >>>>
    >>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
    >>>>
    >>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
    >>>>
    >>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
    >>>> Senator Arlen Specter
    >>>> United States Senate
    >>>> Committee on the Judiciary
    >>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
    >>>> Washington, DC 20510
    >>>>
    >>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
    >>>>
    >>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
    >>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
    >>>> raised in the attached letter.
    >>>>
    >>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
    >>>> tapes.
    >>>>
    >>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
    >>>>
    >>>> Very truly yours,
    >>>> Barry A. Bachrach
    >>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
    >>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
    >>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>
    >> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
    >>
    >>
    >> Sunday, 19 November 2017
    >> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
    >> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
    >> The Supreme Court
    >>
    >> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
    >>
    >>
    >> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    >>
    >> Amos v. Canada
    >> Court (s) Database
    >>
    >> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    >> Date
    >>
    >> 2017-10-30
    >> Neutral citation
    >>
    >> 2017 FCA 213
    >> File numbers
    >>
    >> A-48-16
    >> Date: 20171030
    >>
    >> Docket: A-48-16
    >> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    >> CORAM:
    >>
    >> WEBB J.A.
    >> NEAR J.A.
    >> GLEASON J.A.
    >>
    >>
    >> BETWEEN:
    >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >> Respondent on the cross-appeal
    >> (and formally Appellant)
    >> and
    >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >> Appellant on the cross-appeal
    >> (and formerly Respondent)
    >> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
    >> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
    >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
    >>
    >> THE COURT
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Date: 20171030
    >>
    >> Docket: A-48-16
    >> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    >> CORAM:
    >>
    >> WEBB J.A.
    >> NEAR J.A.
    >> GLEASON J.A.
    >>
    >>
    >> BETWEEN:
    >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >> Respondent on the cross-appeal
    >> (and formally Appellant)
    >> and
    >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >> Appellant on the cross-appeal
    >> (and formerly Respondent)
    >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
    >>
    >> I.                    Introduction
    >>
    >> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
    >> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
    >> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
    >> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
    >> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
    >> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
    >> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
    >> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
    >> (Claim at para. 96).
    >>
    >> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
    >> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
    >> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
    >> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
    >> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
    >> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
    >> Prothontary’s Order).
    >>
    >>
    >> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
    >> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
    >> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
    >> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
    >> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
    >> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
    >>
    >>
    >> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
    >> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
    >> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
    >> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
    >> cross-appeal.
    >>
    >>
    >> II.                 Preliminary Matter
    >>
    >> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
    >> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
    >> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
    >> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
    >> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
    >> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
    >> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
    >> several judges but did not name those judges.
    >>
    >> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
    >> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
    >> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
    >> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
    >> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
    >> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
    >> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
    >> c. F-7:
    >>
    >>
    >> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
    >> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
    >> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
    >> Appeal.
    >> […]
    >>
    >> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
    >> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
    >> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
    >> […]
    >> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
    >> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
    >> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
    >>
    >> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
    >> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
    >> juges de la Cour fédérale.
    >>
    >>
    >> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
    >> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
    >> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
    >> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
    >> section.
    >> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
    >> that:
    >> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    >> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
    >> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
    >> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
    >> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
    >> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    >>
    >> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
    >> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
    >> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
    >> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
    >> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
    >> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
    >> matière civile et pénale.
    >> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    >> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
    >> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
    >> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
    >> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
    >> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    >>
    >> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
    >> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
    >> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
    >> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
    >> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
    >> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
    >> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
    >>
    >>
    >> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
    >> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
    >> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
    >> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
    >> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
    >> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
    >> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
    >> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
    >> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
    >> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
    >> appeal book.
    >>
    >>
    >> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
    >> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
    >> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
    >> conflict in any matter related to him.
    >>
    >>
    >> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
    >> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
    >> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
    >> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
    >> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
    >> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
    >> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
    >> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
    >> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
    >> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
    >> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
    >> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
    >>
    >>
    >> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
    >> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
    >> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
    >> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
    >> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
    >> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
    >> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
    >> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
    >> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
    >> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
    >> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
    >> such judge had a conflict.
    >>
    >>
    >> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
    >> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
    >> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
    >> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
    >> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
    >> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
    >> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
    >> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
    >> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
    >> was a member of such firm.
    >>
    >>
    >> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
    >> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
    >> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
    >> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
    >> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
    >> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
    >> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
    >> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
    >> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
    >>
    >>
    >> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
    >> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
    >> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
    >> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
    >> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
    >> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
    >> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
    >> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
    >> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
    >> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
    >> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
    >> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
    >> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
    >> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
    >> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
    >> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
    >> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
    >> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
    >> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
    >> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
    >> apprehension of bias:
    >> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
    >> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
    >> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
    >> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
    >> reasonable apprehension of bias:
    >> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
    >> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
    >> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
    >> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
    >> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
    >> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
    >> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
    >> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
    >>
    >> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
    >> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
    >> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
    >> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
    >> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
    >> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
    >> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
    >> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
    >> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
    >> (4th) 193).
    >>
    >> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
    >> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
    >> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
    >> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
    >> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
    >> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
    >> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
    >> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
    >> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
    >> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
    >> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
    >> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
    >> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
    >> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
    >> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
    >>
    >>
    >> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
    >> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
    >> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
    >> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
    >> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
    >> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
    >> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
    >> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
    >> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
    >> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
    >>
    >>
    >> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
    >> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
    >> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
    >> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
    >> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
    >> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
    >> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
    >> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
    >> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
    >> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
    >> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
    >> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
    >> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
    >> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
    >> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
    >> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
    >>
    >>
    >> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
    >> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
    >> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
    >> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
    >> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
    >> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
    >> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
    >> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
    >>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
    >> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
    >> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
    >> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
    >> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
    >> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
    >> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
    >> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
    >> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
    >> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
    >> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
    >>
    >>
    >> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
    >> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
    >> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
    >> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
    >> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
    >> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
    >> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
    >> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
    >> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
    >> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
    >> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
    >> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
    >> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
    >> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
    >> events from over a decade ago.
    >> (emphasis added)
    >>
    >> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
    >> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
    >> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
    >> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
    >> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
    >> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
    >> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
    >> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
    >> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
    >> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
    >> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
    >> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
    >> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
    >> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
    >> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
    >> Webb hearing this appeal.
    >>
    >> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
    >> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
    >> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
    >> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
    >> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
    >>
    >> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
    >> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
    >> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
    >> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
    >> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
    >> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
    >> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
    >>
    >> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
    >> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
    >> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
    >> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
    >> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
    >> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
    >> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
    >> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
    >> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
    >> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
    >>
    >> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
    >> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
    >> to recuse himself.
    >>
    >> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
    >> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
    >> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
    >> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
    >> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
    >>
    >> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
    >> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
    >> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
    >> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
    >> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
    >> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
    >> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
    >> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
    >> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
    >> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
    >> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
    >> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
    >>
    >>
    >> III.               Issue
    >>
    >> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
    >> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
    >> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
    >> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
    >> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
    >>
    >> IV.              Analysis
    >>
    >> A.                 Standard of Review
    >>
    >> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
    >> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
    >> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
    >> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
    >> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
    >> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
    >> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
    >> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
    >> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
    >> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
    >> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
    >> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
    >> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
    >> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
    >> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
    >> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
    >> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
    >> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
    >> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
    >>
    >> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
    >> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
    >> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
    >> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
    >> interfere.
    >>
    >>
    >> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
    >> Prothonotary’s Order?
    >>
    >> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
    >> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
    >> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
    >>
    >> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
    >> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
    >> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
    >> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
    >> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
    >> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
    >> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
    >> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
    >> (…)
    >>
    >>
    >> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
    >> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
    >> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
    >> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
    >> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
    >> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
    >> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
    >> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
    >> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
    >> [footnotes omitted].
    >>
    >>
    >> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
    >> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
    >> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
    >> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
    >> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
    >> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
    >> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
    >> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
    >> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
    >> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
    >> para. 27).
    >>
    >>
    >> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
    >> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
    >> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
    >> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
    >>
    >>
    >> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
    >> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
    >> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
    >> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
    >>
    >> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
    >> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
    >>
    >> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
    >> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
    >>
    >> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
    >> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
    >> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
    >> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
    >> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
    >>
    >> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
    >> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
    >> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
    >> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
    >> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
    >>
    >> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
    >> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
    >> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
    >>
    >> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
    >> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
    >> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
    >> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
    >> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
    >> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
    >> of process…
    >>
    >> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
    >> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
    >> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
    >> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
    >> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
    >> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
    >> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
    >> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
    >> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
    >>
    >> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
    >> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
    >> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
    >>
    >> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
    >> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
    >> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
    >> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
    >> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
    >> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
    >> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
    >> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
    >> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
    >> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
    >> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
    >> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
    >> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
    >> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
    >> supporting a cause of action.
    >>
    >> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
    >> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
    >> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
    >> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
    >> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
    >> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
    >> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
    >> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
    >>
    >> V.                 Conclusion
    >> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
    >> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
    >> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
    >> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
    >> without leave to amend.
    >> "Wyman W. Webb"
    >> J.A.
    >> "David G. Near"
    >> J.A.
    >> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
    >> J.A.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
    >> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
    >>
    >> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
    >> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
    >> DOCKET:
    >>
    >> A-48-16
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> STYLE OF CAUSE:
    >>
    >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> PLACE OF HEARING:
    >>
    >> Fredericton,
    >> New Brunswick
    >>
    >> DATE OF HEARING:
    >>
    >> May 24, 2017
    >>
    >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
    >>
    >> WEBB J.A.
    >> NEAR J.A.
    >> GLEASON J.A.
    >>
    >> DATED:
    >>
    >> October 30, 2017
    >>
    >> APPEARANCES:
    >> David Raymond Amos
    >>
    >>
    >> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
    >> (on his own behalf)
    >>
    >> Jan Jensen
    >>
    >>
    >> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
    >>
    >> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
    >> Nathalie G. Drouin
    >> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
    >>
    >> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
    >>
    >>
    >> https://www.facebook.com/johnwilliamsonNB/photos/a.848901995163272.1073741826.172576949462450/1765074580212671/?type=3
    >>
    >> John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick
    >> Southwest
    >> May 17 at 12:48pm ·
    >>
    >> Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
    >> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
    >> the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.
    >>
    >> Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
    >> issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
    >> Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
    >> 2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
    >> that his local campaign was strong.
    >>
    >> How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
    >> John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
    >> here: https://donate.conservative.ca/membership/
    >>
    >> There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
    >> be made, and events already planned.
    >>
    >> Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
    >> 506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!
    >>
    >> Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
    >> ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.
    >>
    >> And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
    >> and to learn about upcoming events.
    >>
    >> Go John! And Vote John W!
    >>
    >> Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
    >> Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
    >> federal politics
    >> CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT | Last Updated: May 28
    >> Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he
    >> won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)
    >>
    >> New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its
    >> highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.
    >>
    >> Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead
    >> jump into federal politics.
    >>
    >> Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA
    >> said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who
    >> beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.
    >>
    >> "It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong
    >> voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my
    >> heart.
    >>
    >> "I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's
    >> very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis,
    >> I want to move on."
    >>
    >> Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
    >> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
    >> riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
    >>
    >> Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative
    >> nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes
    >> part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
    >>
    >>     Health critic slams 'gutting' of top doctor's office
    >>
    >>     Blaine Higgs faces internal PC dissent over appointment
    >>
    >> That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John
    >> Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the
    >> riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding
    >> will nominate their candidate June 28.
    >>
    >> Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton.
    >> The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with
    >> national organizations that advocate for veterans.
    >>
    >> "I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he
    >> said.
    >>
    >>     Blaine Higgs wins N.B. PC leadership race on 3rd ballot
    >>
    >>     Tory leadership hopefuls scramble to be 'second choice' of rivals'
    >> supporters
    >>
    >> Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC
    >> leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under
    >> Higgs.
    >>
    >> Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and
    >> the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of
    >> becoming a minister.
    >>
    >> But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it
    >> does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go
    >> another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my
    >> options would be limited after that."
    >>
    >> The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him
    >> realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.
    >>
    >> Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
    >> years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
    >> Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
    >> Fredericton for the 2008 election.
    >>
    >> After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
    >> Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
    >> the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
    >> defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.
    >>
    >> Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive
    >> Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
    >>
    >> In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the
    >> first ballot out of seven candidates.
    >>
    >> Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial
    >> party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.
    >>
    >> "It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre
    >> candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.
    >>
    >



    EUB Barring.pdf
    79K View as HTMLScan and download
    2 attachmentsScan and download all attachments

    EUB 430 Decision.pdf
    273K View as HTMLScan and download

    Add star 

    David Amos

    <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    AttachmentMon, Nov 1, 2021 at 2:44 PM
    To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca, marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org, rbrossard@contribuables.ca, krondolo@generationscrewed.ca, federal.director@taxpayer.com, jbowes@taxpayer.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca, strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca, leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com, fterrazzano@taxpayer.com, pmacpherson@taxpayer.com, on.director@taxpayer.com, prairie@taxpayer.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie"<JPetrie@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John"<john.furey@mcinnescooper.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "howard.anglin"<howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson"<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>
    Bcc: myson333 <myson333@yahoo.com>, rrichard <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>, Fishman Kramer <lizkramer@hotmail.com>, hcs6cedar <hcs6cedar@gmail.com>

     
     

    The CBC News is Too Too Funny today Methinks the LIEbranos and CUPE could use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?

    $
    0
    0
    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 04:31:12 +0000
    Subject: RE: YO Mr Jones do ya think Higgy or Stevey Boy Murphy or
    everybody's evil blogging buddy Chucky Lelanc will explain just one of
    my old emails to the latest CUPE Bosses?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 01:31:06 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: YO Mr Jones do ya think Higgy or Stevey Boy Murphy or
    everybody's evil blogging buddy Chucky Lelanc will explain just one of
    my old emails to the latest CUPE Bosses?
    To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
    marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
    kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
    attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org,
    rbrossard@contribuables.ca, krondolo@generationscrewed.ca,
    federal.director@taxpayer.com, jbowes@taxpayer.com,
    Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
    tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
    PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
    strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca,
    calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca, leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca,
    premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca,
    premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com,
    fterrazzano@taxpayer.com, pmacpherson@taxpayer.com,
    on.director@taxpayer.com, prairie@taxpayer.com,
    Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
    <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
    Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau"
    <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>,
    "Holland, Mike (LEG)"<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, jcarpay
    <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie"<JPetrie@nbpower.com>, "Furey,
    John"<john.furey@mcinnescooper.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "howard.anglin"
    <howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson"
    <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
    "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 01:18:15 -0300
    Subject: YO Mr Jones do ya think Higgy or Stevey Boy Murphy or
    everbody's evil blogging buddy Chucky Lelanc will explain just one of
    my old emails to the latest CUPE Bosses?
    To: "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Stephendrost1418@gmail.com,
    "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
    <robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>,
    "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
    fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca,
    Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, jesse@viafoura.com,
    news@dailygleaner.com, nben@nben.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
    dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, jeff.carr@gnb.ca,
    oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
    Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca, Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca,
    megan.mitton@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
    steve.murphy@ctv.ca, nick.brown@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca,
    michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, carl.davies@gnb.ca,
    Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca, ron.tremblay2@gmail.com,
    Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
    philippe@dunsky.com, Steven_Reid3@carleton.ca,
    darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca, "sylvie.gadoury"
    <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Cyril.Theriault"
    <Cyril.Theriault@gmail.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
    <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, pchamp@champlaw.ca, "hugh.flemming"
    <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>


     
     

     

    Steve Drost Elected President of CUPE NB

    This Saturday April 24 2021, Steve Drost has been elected for a 2-year term as provincial president of the New Brunswick Division of the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE NB). More than 200 delegates, representing CUPE locals from across the province, elected Drost to lead New Brunswick’s largest union. The vote was conducted Saturday afternoon at CUPE NB’s 58th annual convention, which took place virtually, Friday and Saturday.


    “I will do my best each and every day for all our members, to make sure we are truly listening and making CUPE NB a grassroots, member driven Division. I am honoured to be your president,” said Drost to delegates. Drost, who has been vice-president of CUPE NB for the last two years, takes the place of President Brien Watson.

    “I have been working for over 44 years in the education sector, so I am looking forward for retirement,” said Brien Watson.  “I wish Steve all the best in his new role,” said Watson.

    “It’s an honour to follow in the foots steps of Brother Watson, who diligently served his 2-year term as Division President. He picked up the “Bargaining Forward” campaign, and took head-on the enormous curveball that is COVID-19,” said Drost.

    Sharon Teare, herself a Personal Care worker at St John & St Stephen Home in Saint John and President of the NB Council of Nursing Home Unions, has been elected for a one-year term as  CUPE NB’s First Vice-President. Drost and Teare will join Kim Copp on the CUPE NB inner executive. Copp is currently the CUPE NB Secretary Treasurer and works as an LPN at the Forestdale Home in Riverside Albert.

    “With those two great leaders by my side, we have what it takes to mount the challenge against Blaine Higgs’s “Zeros for our Heroes” wage freeze plans and his anti-worker politics,” said Drost.

    Drost has been president of CUPE Local 1418, Rehabilitation and Therapy since 2013. He began his career as a practising social worker in 1988. At present he is a Clinical 3 Social Worker and has been practising front line Social Work in Child Welfare his entire career.

    “Brother Drost is a dedicated activist. I’m confident our Division and the labour movement will grow even stronger under his leadership,” said Brien Watson.



     
     

    Tuesday, 2 November 2021

    Steve Drost, CUPE NB Presiden is asked by Blogger about Locked Out Worke...




      


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 22:39:40 +0000
    Subject: RE: Higgy lets the cat out of the bag and reveals that he is
    still messing with other people's pensions for the benefit of his
    bankster buddies
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.


    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-

    Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>

     
    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 21:33:45 -0300
    Subject: YO Mr Jones do ya think Mr Higgs is reading CBC yet?
    To: "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
    <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
    "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"
    <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "greg.byrne"
    <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison
    <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
    "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
    <mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
    "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
    ,
    "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
    premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
    <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
    "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
    "Russell, Stephen"<srussell@nbpower.com>, "Waycott, Stephen"
    <SWaycott@nbpower.com>, "Stephen.Horsman"<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>,
    "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan
    (LEG)"<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"
    <rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, "michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>,
    "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"
    <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/09/premier-promises-nursing-home-workers.html

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/blaine-higgs-cupe-nursing-home-workers-1.5295459

     Premier promises nursing home workers a new wage proposal they won't like
    Offer will be presented this week or next and will be 'final,' premier says
    CBC · Posted: Sep 24, 2019 3:40 PM AT


    90 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story.



    David Raymond Amos
    I have been arguing the budget and pensions with Higgs and his cohorts
    for years. The most memorable time was a after a debate with Rob Moore
    the lawyer buddy of Higgs during the last federal election. I had some
    fun but I bet Higgs was sorry he crossed paths with me that night. In
    the last election during the only debate I was allowed to participate
    in I explained again how I would go about us getting us out of debt
    overnight and stop the lawsuits by merely honouring the deal with the
    bureaucrats and teachers etc and their pension plans Bruce Northrup
    nor anyone else dared to argue the common sense of such a simple idea.
    I also repeated the simple idea on Rogers TV and it still can be
    viewed to this very day.

    Is anybody curious?

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
    Well as the people elected them and not you, I’d say they won that
    debate, despite your evisiknist history. Heck they won it without even
    needing to talk.

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @David Raymond Amos: I see the Irving shill is still dogging
    me but whenever I respond to him I am blocked Go Figure whose side CBC
    is on

    Clarence Slydell
    Reply to @David Raymond Amos:

    I posted this in reply to another poster on a different story but it
    applies here as well.

    "Johnny boy likes to argue. He likes to take the opposing side of any
    topic and put his own oddball spin on it and then hang on with all his
    might, kinda like a pitbull with it's jaws clamped down on whatever
    victim it chooses, making stuff up as he goes along and most people
    fall right into his trap engaging him while he giggles with glee at
    the attention he's getting.

    There is a word for this kind of behaviour on internet boards but CBC
    doesn't like anyone to use it as they seem to enjoy the results that
    it brings."

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Clarence Slydell: I figured that out months ago However the
    real question is why does CBC block replies to him?

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Clarence Slydell: BTW scroll to the bottom comment to see
    what I said to Deschamps last night

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Clarence Slydell: BTW this is what he want folks to ignore
    now that my name is on another ballot Obviously I am the first one to
    speak

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZqArRNshSM






    Ben Haroldson
    It'll be final in his own mind. Time to call a new provincial
    election.Between him and cardy, things are NOT good.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
    Yes they were SOOOOO MUCH better when the libs bid $100m on some
    sports games and gave their buddies six figure patronage jobs,

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
    Yea ATCON was so much better.

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: did I say anything about electing libs? I
    have NEVER voted lib in my life. So figure it out wise guy.

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: For that matter, I have NEVER voted pc
    provincially either. I did use the fed pcs to get rid of the gun reg,
    and I am going to do it again.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
    What other choices are there, the greens and ndp will do the exact
    same thing. It’s the whole core of party politics.

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: Waste yer vote. I usually vote for the party
    or ind not aligned with gun control, heck I'd even vote for the DA if
    he was running in my riding.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
    The whole problem with turfing governments every four or eight years
    is that they don’t have time to get anything accomplished in terms of
    real change. They spend their time trying to undo the mess the
    previous government left behind.

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: On the pot thing, the big delay was for the
    hairy man to get all his buds in the door.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
    Yep cause there aren’t enough deaths due to guns in Toronto. Nobody
    NEEDS a gun. People want them sure but they don’t need them.

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: Coruption is the problem. Doesn't matter who
    gets in fed, or prov, every one of them passes through the event
    horizon of the black hole of corruption. We need to get to the bottom
    of that in a hurry.

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: It's a hobby for me. I hunt, and I love wild
    meat, and I love the woods. I'm not hurting a thing and I'm all legal,
    but whenever something happens in the big smoke, I'm one of the ones
    who gets punished.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
    People hunted wild meat for millennia before guns...

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: Well then why aren't we still doing it that way?

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
    You tell me, you are the one using the gun :)

    Lewis Taylor
    Reply to @Johnny Horton:
    remember Orimulsion??

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:" heck I'd even vote for the DA if he was
    running in my riding."

    Thank You Kind Sir

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson: Methinks you will like what I said about my
    guns N'esy Pas?

    Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
    By Erin Hatfield

    "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
    world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

    The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
    the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
    watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
    unofficial, theme song for the debate.

    The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
    they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
    Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
    chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
    left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
    mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
    the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat."

    "Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
    responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
    exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
    Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
    other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
    Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
    questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
    relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
    response to the question of the national gun registry. "Nobody's
    getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
    You mean how the liberals promised an inquiry until they got into
    power and shut one down so the citizens couldn’t delve into the deal
    they made for $338 million while having lost $700m on the
    rifrvidhment,

    Typica” liberal math though as long as some money coma in, it doesn’t
    matter the actual cost.

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Good luck next time

    Ben Haroldson
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: " Nobody NEEDS a gun. People want them sure
    but they don’t need them. " That statement is as liberal as it gets
    around here, so you really don't know what you are or aren't.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson:
    I’m libertarian, no government.

    But my political leanings have nothing to doe tin if people need a gun or not,
    . Shoot, I’m not even opposed to guns. However people still don’t need
    them despite what I actually think of them. That’s too separate issue.

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Ben Haroldson: Next Time? I am on the the ballot in Fundy
    Royal right now I don't need luck because I have no false illusions of
    ever winning If you watched what I said on Rogers TV when I ran
    against Bruce Northrup et al last fall you should have noticed that I
    didn't ask anyone to vote for me. I use the political debates to
    expose the public corruption in support of my litigation.

    George Smith
    Seems a significant number of Higgs appointments are Irving people. He
    treats bargaining like the Irvings too. Welcome to the New Irving
    government. I believe the others parties should defeat him and he'd be
    thrown out of office. But that won't happen because they have a say in
    this Minority Government and probably wouldn't have a say after a new
    election.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @George Smith:
    Why? So the liberals can again get in power and hire all their buddies
    for the next frsncophonie games?

    George Smith
    Reply to @Johnny Horton:
    So you support the new Irving run Government of N.B. We always knew
    they ran our province no matter what party was in power. Higgs just
    makes it official.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @George Smith:
    So why it when one says something on the internet, it automatically
    implies the opposite.

    Can one not like either? Must one spell thst our in every single post,

    Although I do support both parties limiting the raise to 1% like all
    the other groups got.

    I do find it very hypocritical though that suddenly the liberals want
    blood on this file. It’s just so bloody transparent politics. For
    something hike in power, against it while not in power. Thst goes for
    many things including in this case, patronage sppoitments and the 1%
    raise.

    Lewis Taylor
    Reply to @Johnny Horton:
    Horton are you an Irving employee???

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Of course he is

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor:
    Right, so one can’t criticize the other side, if they do. They clearly
    work for Irving, left wing logic.
    One csn dislike bofh you know, it doesn’t need to be pointed out in
    every post everything gone dislikes,

    David Raymond Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Its a waste of precious time arguing with an
    Irving However an Irving Newsrag did tell a little truth about me
    years ago

    The Unconventional Candidate

    David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….

    By Gisele McKnight

    FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
    wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
    that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

    Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.

    The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
    and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
    running for office in Canada.

    One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
    to meet Elections Canada requirements.

    When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
    favourite place to do so—Fundy.

    Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
    dissatisfaction with politicians.

    "I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
    said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

    The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
    1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
    needed to change his life.

    "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
    sometimes in midlife."

    So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
    motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
    Panhead motorcycle.

    "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
    experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
    renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
    for anything, but you take what they offer."


    David Raymond Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @David Raymond Amos:

    For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
    and conversation all over North America.

    Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
    and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
    himself.

    He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
    rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
    individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
    Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."

    Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.

    "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
    "It’s alright to ***** in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"

    What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
    the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
    name a few.

    "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
    farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
    death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
    (NAFTA) out the window.

    NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
    easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.

    Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.

    "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
    especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
    Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."

    Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
    your X by his name.

    "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
    say, ‘what the hell.’"






    Johnny Horton
    It’s hilarious watching all the liberals foaming at the bit for Higgs
    had over this - w%%hen the liberals had the file for over two years
    and made basically the exact same offer.

    Lewis TaylorContent disabled
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: Irving Boy!

    David Raymond Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor: I call him an Irving shill







    Kyle Woodman
    How can Higgs, on the one hand, say we have no money but then appoint
    a partisan "tourism consultant" with no credentials to a newly created
    position for $175,000 /year +expenses. We are already paying a
    qualified deputy minister to do that job. Dosen't sound like "finding
    efficiencies" to me.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Kyle Woodman:
    So as long as the money goes instead to this special interest group
    instead of that special interest
    group, it’s okay?

    Kyle Woodman
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: what special interest group is Yetta Hurley part of?

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Kyle Woodman:
    Special interest group, as in a group looking out for their own
    special interests,

    Kyle Woodman
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: you think you're pretty smart, don't you. It
    comes across as arrogance.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Kyle Woodman:
    I don’t see why pointing out s group of people wanting a raise higher
    than what every other government group has gotten is arrogant, and
    it’s certainly self interest to demand a raise more than others got.

    David Raymond Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Kyle Woodman: I truly believe he is as dumb as post






    Johnny Horton
    All those poor stressed out laundry workers need their 20% raise.

    George Smith
    Reply to @Johnny Horton:
    Just wondering which Irving company you work for.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @George Smith:
    I don’t work for Irving never did. I do however though think
    government wages should be in line with private sector wages for the
    same job,

    Lewis Taylor
    Reply to @Johnny Horton:
    You could get a job and work in a nursing home?

    David Raymond Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: Pure D BS

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor:
    If they’d hire me without needing to join a union so I can negotiate
    my own job description and salary. Sure, I could leave retirement to
    pitch in,





    Matt Steele
    Govt. workers need to realize that N.B. is broke , and the TAXPAYERS
    ARE MAXED OUT . The Province currently has a 14 BILLION dollar debt ;
    and pays around 2 MILLION per day just in interest . Maybe if these
    Govt. workers want more money , they should get a job in the private
    sector , and see what they are getting paid . No one is forcing these
    workers to work for govt. as they can quit any time that they wish

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Matt Steele: Cry me another river







    SarahRose Werner
    "This has to be a team." - Oh, yeah, telling people, "You won't like
    this but it's final," that's a really great way to inspire team work.
    Being a team depends on trust, and Higgs has yet to give the workers
    any reasons to trust him.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @SarahRose Werner:
    The “team” is the group of workers that get paid by the government.
    The Rest of the team has accepted 1%.

    Marguerite Deschamps
    Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Where the elusive Higgs Bozon worked
    before, he used to tell people what to do. That's what he calls team
    work.

    Marguerite Deschamps
    Reply to @Johnny Horton:

    Lewis Taylor
    Reply to @Johnny Horton:
    Not so popular...IRving boy

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor: HMMMM





    Paul Bourgoin
    One has to understand that here in New Brunswick subsidies to industry
    who milk government funds, benefit from tax breaks are more important
    than services to the owners of New Brunswick, the RESIDENTS!

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Paul tha
    One has to understand that here in NB, one is part of a system. that
    if one gets 20%, sll have to get 20%. Thst as everyone else has
    accepted 1%, they must accept that is what they will get too.

    Marguerite Deschamps
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: I always thought you CONservative supporters
    understood the market forces of capitalism and offer and demand? -
    Maybe the elusive Higgs Bozon will, too late, he'll finally see, that
    health care workers have gone somewhere else.

    Johnny Horton
    Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps:
    First off I’m not conservative.
    You do know people can be something other than a lib or a con right?
    Secondly. There is nothing capitalist nor supply and demand about a union.
    Drop the union, let each worker negotiate their own value, then you’ll
    actually have capitalism,

    Marguerite Deschamps
    Reply to @Johnny Horton: then what are you, green?

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Marguerite Deschamps: Methinks he is playing you like a
    fiddle N'esy Pas?




    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/final-offer-cupe-nursing-home-workers-1.5299598

    Final offer from province still not enough, nursing home union says

    Union leaders expect wage proposal will be rejected by members,
    prolonging the dispute
    Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Sep 27, 2019 11:35 AM AT


    149 Comments


    David Raymond Amos
    "We're willing to wait out the premier on that [St. Croix] byelection,
    and we can count, and he can count too," Cormier said. "If he loses
    that byelection, we can count as well. His government could fall."

    Methinks the old Union dudes are as dumb as posts anyone with half a
    clue can see Higgs is baiting people on many fronts so that an
    election will be called while the liberals are in the toilet. Clearly
    the Ex-Cor Clown thinks he can win a majority next time around.
    However the Green Meanies and the PANB Wackos may serve upon Higgs and
    Vickers a rather shocking surprise if enough folks get tired of the NB
    Power nonsense such a 100 million for "Not So Smart" meters and huge
    NB Power payout to the the Irvings et al byway of Large Industrial
    Renewable Energy Purchase Program which was unveiled by the Alward
    government in 2011 N'esy Pas?

    I bet Higgs remembers this headline

    EUB challenges NB Power to reveal analysis of political burden
    Crown corporation resists full disclosure of cost analysis to protect
    commercially sensitive information
    Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Apr 29, 2016 7:23 AM AT




    David Raymond Amos
    Methinks the ghost of Lofty MacMillan is laughing at this nonsense
    while the mean mouthed little Bobby Davidson is is crying because he
    ain't involved in this war of words N'esy Pas?









    David Raymond Amos
    "We can't wait to see that clock run out in Charlotte County because
    we'll certainly be in Charlotte County to ask the Tory candidate what
    he thinks of the nursing home workers in his riding that he or she
    would be representing," said union first vice-president Roland
    Cormier."

    Too Too Funny Methinks they were serious and wished to force political
    showdown with Higgs the Union dudes should be asking Gallant to stay
    in his seat awhile longer and asking the liberal MLA to step down from
    the Speakers Chair ASAP N'esy Pas?






    David Raymond Amos
    Surprise Surprise Surprise

    Terry Tibbs
    Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
    What do you think David? 48 hour flu coming right up?

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks its par for the course N'esy Pas?






    Chantal LeBouthi
    On radio Canada Robert gauvin is telling austerity

    Ray Bungay
    Reply to @Chantal LeBouthi: Yes and the City of Saint John wants its
    workers to settle for around 1%, like when pigs fly!

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @Chantal LeBouthi: Methinks some folks know that Robert
    Gauvin is just a comedian who has links with the Irving Clan's media
    Hence he will never be reelected on the North Shore Perhaps he should
    move to Saint John Harbour and run there next time next time Everybody
    in Fat Fred City knows that Stinktown could use a good laugh or two
    these days N'esy Pas?






    Michael Levesque
    we got money for Rodney Weston and Dana Glendenning to collect NB
    taxpayer funded pension checks they DID NOT QUALIFY FOR bur we got no
    money for valuable home care workers.

    David Raymond Amos
    Reply to @michael levesque: Methinks you should ask yourself why I am
    humming that old Pink Floyd tune called "Us and Them" Trust that the
    Union bosses doing all the yapping are just playing their part at the
    circus because their wages and pensions are secure N'esy Pas?

    "Up and down.
    But in the end it's only round and round.
    Haven't you heard it's a battle of words
    The poster bearer cried."




    On 9/26/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/credit-nb-budget-surplus-1.5296734
    >
    > New Brunswick deep in the black — again
    >
    > PCs may not be able to take all the credit for $72.6M budget surplus
    > Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Sep 26, 2019 6:00 AM AT
    >
    > 64  comments
    >
    > David Raymond Amos
    > "Despite the surplus, New Brunswick's debt still grew slightly, by
    > $32.7 million, because of the ongoing addition of new capital assets."
    >
    > Go figure why Higgs and Holland are ignoring NB Power wish to add
    > another 100 million to our deft for "not So Smart Meters" after the
    > EUB had turned them down under Gallant's mandate
    >
     
     
     

    Premier Higgs heard CUPE members loud and clear

    Share this page in your online social circles

    Striking CUPE members at the NB legislatureOver 5,000 striking frontline workers, CUPE leaders from other provinces and supporters marched on the New Brunswick legislature to send a message to Premier Blaine Higgs and the governing PC Party. That message was heard loud and clear as it was reported by news outlets that the crowd noise and speeches from outside could be heard throughout the building.

    MLAs were returning to the legislature on what was supposed to be the opening day of the new legislative session, however, Premier Higgs announced earlier that they would cancel the throne speech and extend the previous session. Many expected this move would set the stage for the announcement of back to work legislation. However, no such legislation was announced.

    The rally began after two separate marches of frontline workers and supporters converged on the steps of the legislature. CUPENB President Steve Drost addressed the crowd, reminding frontline workers that they hold the power when they work together. He introduced the presidents of all 10 striking locals, who called upon their members in the crowd to make themselves heard. CUPE Maritimes Regional Director Sandy Harding called Premier Higgs out to a bargaining table that was set up at the steps and read out the last bargaining positions before Higgs had walked away from negotiations.

    CUPE’s National President Mark Hancock delivered an energetic speech, calling out Premier Higgs for his allegiances to the billionaire Irving Family and correcting the premier on his claim that the strike is being run by the CUPE National machine. “The CUPE machine,” Hancock said, “is each and every one of you who voted to take strike action and are walking picket lines until the government pays you what you’re worth.” National Secretary Charles Fleury also addressed the crowd, strengthening the striking workers’ resolve proclaiming that “sometimes we have no choice but to take to the streets, and we’ll stay on the streets until we get the contract we deserve.

    The province-wide strike will enter its sixth day tomorrow. CUPE New Brunswick’s Central Bargaining Team is still waiting for the Higgs government to return to the bargaining table.

     
     

    CUPE joins court challenge over violation of Charter rights by the Province of New Brunswick

    Share this page in your online social circles

    Fredericton, NB– The Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) has served the province of New Brunswick with a Notice of Motion to intervene in a lawsuit launched by the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) against the unilateral conversion of the province’s Public Service Pension Plan into a Shared Risk Pension Plan.

    “The rights of CUPE members and many other public sector workers were violated when the government unilaterally imposed pension changes on workers, in violation of their right to free collective bargaining,” said Daniel Légère, president of CUPENB.

    In December of 2013, the Province adopted Bill 11 - An Act Respecting Pensions which converted the province’s pension plan - to which CUPE’s members belong - into a so-called ‘shared risk’ pension plan. Far from sharing risk, however, the effect of the conversion was to reduce benefits and shift substantial pension risk from the province to CUPE members and other public servants.

    The conversion significantly reduced the benefits provided by the pension plan, significantly reduced the security of benefits and barred any collective agreement provisions that could improve members’ pension benefits in the future.

    “These changes violated our members’ rights under section 2(d) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the “Charter”),” said Légère. “CUPE fully supports this court challenge and will intervene to defend our members’ rights.”

    A Statement of Claim filed by PIPSC in February of this year alleges that the statutory imposition of the shared risk model, together with the denial of fundamental collective bargaining rights, substantially interfere with the guarantee of freedom of association protected by section 2(d) of the Charter. CUPE’s intervention will support the challenge on that basis.

    CUPE has also sought full disclosure under the Province’s Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act in accordance with the government’s promise of transparency and openness in regard to the conversion. However, notwithstanding findings in favour of disclosure by the Province’s Office of the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner in a decision dated March 4, 2016, access to conversion relevant materials has so far been denied.

     

     


    New Brunswick C.U.P.E. President Daniel Légère stalked by Blogger!!!

    73 views
    Nov 1, 2018

    2.14K subscribers

     


    The day C.U.P.E. President Daniel Légère straighten out the Chaleur Regional Service Commission!!!

    84 views
    Nov 3, 2018
    2.14K subscribers

     

     https://nbmediacoop.org/2019/04/17/15222/

     

    Outgoing CUPE NB president Daniel Légère praised as “an elevater”

    A chapter in the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) New Brunswick’s history has closed with Daniel Légère’s end of tenure as the union’s president. Labour leaders and social justice advocates in New Brunswick are remembering his time as president as a remarkable one for leadership and solidarity.  

    At the CUPE NB Convention in Fredericton on April 11, members of the province’s largest union elected a new president, Brien Watson. Watson will replace Légère, who held the position for 14 years.

    Patrick Colford, president of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour, calls Légère “an elevater.”

    “As Nelson Mandela once said, ‘It is better to lead from behind and to put others in front, especially when you celebrate victory when nice things occur. You take the front line when there is danger. Then people will appreciate your leadership.’ This quote summarizes Danny Légère’s leadership style. He has always been an elevater, lifting people up and helping them both realize their full potential and ensuring that they reach their potential,” says Colford.

    Légère’s union activism began the day he became a worker almost 40 years ago. As a correctional officer in St. Hilaire, he became the shop steward and was supporting worker grievances before he had even passed his probationary period.

    Danny Légère and Sandy Harding, CUPE Maritimes regional director. CUPE photo.

    Sandy Harding, Vice-President of CUPE NB, says, “Danny is a principled, passionate and dedicated leader. During his 14 years as CUPE NB president, he grew the membership and engaged workers the likes of which has not been seen in decades. He left CUPE NB in a better and stronger place.”

    Making L’Acadie Nouvelle’s top 30 list of most influential New Brunswick francophones in 2017 and 2018, Légère has been a spokesperson for better wages and pensions, pay equity, new legislation on first contract arbitration and a critical voice against privatization of health care and public services.

    Not only a fierce defender of his union’s membership, which includes nursing home workers, health care workers, child care providers, school bus drivers, librarians and other workers across the province, Légère can also be found on picket lines and rallies in solidarity with other workers and marginalized groups here in New Brunswick and across the world.

    danny-jesus-michel
    In 2008, Danny Légère, then President of CUPE NB (left) and Michel Boudreau, then President of the NB Federation of Labour, met with Jesus Brochero, representative with SINTRACARBON, in Moncton to discuss the conditions and demands of coal miners in Colombia. Photo: Tracy Glynn.

    David Frank, a labour historian, notes Légère’s social unionism. According to Frank, “The most important thing to know about Danny Légère is that he came up through the ranks of a union that values active membership engagement at all levels, from its locals and councils to the provincial division. As a leader, he has helped make CUPE NB a strong voice for the kind of social unionism that advances the interests of all working people in the province.”

    A strong supporter of CUPE’s global justice campaigns, Légère is also active with the New Democratic Party and the Common Front for Social Justice, the province’s largest anti-poverty group.

    Danny Légère, President of CUPE NB, and other labour representatives rally against the Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement outside the office of Moncton MP Brian Murphy in 2009. Photo by Tracy Glynn.

    Légère has joined other union leaders and students to protest the Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement, extended his support to Colombian and Filipino workers at times that called for cross-border worker solidarity, and joined Mi’kmaq and Wolastoqiyik peoples and allies at Idle No More actions.

    “Danny has been a friend, a mentor, and a confident to so many during his tenure as CUPE NB president. He will leave a huge void there, but with his leadership and mentoring he has paved away for other leaders to take the reins. Danny has garnered the respect of Canadians from coast to coast to coast. His legacy will live on throughout the labour movement for many, many years to come,” says Colford.

    Tracy Glynn, an editorial board member of the NB Media Co-op, has worked with Daniel Légère in numerous coalitions and networks, including in solidarity with workers in Colombia.

     

    https://fednb.ca/about/executive/


    2019-2021 Executive Council

    Executive Officers

    Daniel Légère, CUPE

    Daniel Légère, CUPE

    President

    Brian Duplessis, ILA

    Brian Duplessis, ILA

    Secretary - Treasurer

    Chris Watson, CUPE

    Chris Watson, CUPE

    1st Vice President

    Amanda Coughlan

    Amanda Coughlan

    2nd Vice President

    Heather Fraser, PSAC

    Heather Fraser, PSAC

    Vice-President responsible for Women’s Issues

    Armando Flores

    Armando Flores

    Vice-President responsible for Young Workers

    Union Vice-Presidents – 5,000 and more members



    Sandy HardingCUPE
    Stephen DrostCUPE
    Shanny DoucetPSAC
    Joey DunphyPSAC
    Paula DoucetNBNU
    Maria RichardNBNU

    Union Vice-Presidents – 800 to 5,000 members



    Dave DudleyCUPW
    Daniel SmithUFCW
    Carla ThibodeauUSW


    Wayne BrownNBFUR

     

    Union Vice-Presidents – less than 800 members



    George LeamanBCTGM
    Larry CookIAFF

    Labour Councils’ Vice-Presidents



    Kevin Suttie- Saint JohnCUPW
    David Meade – FrederictonPSAC
    Lorn Martin – EdmundstonCUPE
    Vacant- Restigouche
    Vacant – Miramichi
    Melissa Brown – MonctonCUPE
    Serge Plourde- BathurstCUPE

     

    Canadian Labour Congress



    Alex FurlongAtlantic Regional Director
    Serge LandryRegional Representative

     

     

     https://fednb.ca/open-letter-to-premier-higgs-land-acknowledgments/

     

    Hon. Blaine Higgs
    Premier, Government of New Brunswick
    Chancery Place
    P.O. Box 6000
    Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1

    (Open letter)

    October 20, 2021

    Dear Premier Higgs,

    We [I] would like to begin by acknowledging that we are in Mi’kma’ki, the ancestral and unceded territory of the Mi’kmaq People. This territory is covered by the “Treaties of Peace and Friendship” which Mi’kmaq Wəlastəkwiyik (Maliseet), and Passamaquoddy Peoples first signed with the British Crown in 1726. (NBFL Land Acknowledgment)

    Like many union, social and community organizations, the New Brunswick Federation of Labour (NBFL) starts all of its meetings and events with a land acknowledgment. We believe that this is an important step towards reconciliation by acknowledging a historical fact.

    I was pleased to see the significant presence of Indigenous peoples at the New Brunswick Day celebrations this year. I was hopeful that our government was taking a huge step towards reconciliation in our province. However, my hope was tempered by the recent directive from your government for public servants not to refer to the land being unceded or unsurrendered in land acknowledgments.

    On behalf of the 38,000 affiliated members of the New Brunswick Federation of Labour, I am calling on you to reconsider this position and withdraw this directive. It divides our communities even further in New Brunswick.

    Sincerely,
    Daniel Legere
    President, New Brunswick Federation of Labour

     
     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:38:11 -0300
    Subject: Higgy lets the cat out of the bag and reveals that he is
    still messing with other people's pensions for the benefit of his
    bankster buddies
    To: andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca,
    marc.martin@snb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
    kris.austin@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
    attorneygeneral@ontario.ca, caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.org,
    rbrossard@contribuables.ca, krondolo@generationscrewed.ca,
    federal.director@taxpayer.com, jbowes@taxpayer.com,
    Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
    tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
    PABMINMAILG@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@gov.bc.ca,
    strathmore.brooks@assembly.ab.ca, brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca,
    calgary.lougheed@assembly.ab.ca, leader@freedomconservativeparty.ca,
    premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca,
    premier@gov.ab.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca, ksims@taxpayer.com,
    fterrazzano@taxpayer.com, pmacpherson@taxpayer.com,
    on.director@taxpayer.com, prairie@taxpayer.com,
    Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca, "barbara.massey"
    <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
    Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "Mike.Comeau"
    <Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, ministryofjustice <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>,
    "Holland, Mike (LEG)"<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, jcarpay
    <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, "Petrie, Jamie"<JPetrie@nbpower.com>, "Furey,
    John"<john.furey@mcinnescooper.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "howard.anglin"
    <howard.anglin@gmail.com>, "John.Williamson"
    <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
    "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 19:38:22 -0300
    Subject: Higgy lets the cat out of the bag and reveals that he is
    still messing with other people's pensions for the benefit of his
    bankster buddies
    To: Stephendrost1418@gmail.com, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
    "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
    <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
    fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca,
    Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca, jesse@viafoura.com,
    news@dailygleaner.com, nben@nben.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
    dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, jeff.carr@gnb.ca,
    oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
    Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca, Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca,
    megan.mitton@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
    steve.murphy@ctv.ca, nick.brown@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca,
    michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, carl.davies@gnb.ca,
    Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca, ron.tremblay2@gmail.com,
    Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
    philippe@dunsky.com, Steven_Reid3@carleton.ca,
    darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca, "sylvie.gadoury"
    <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Cyril.Theriault"
    <Cyril.Theriault@gmail.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
    <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, pchamp@champlaw.ca, "hugh.flemming"
    <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/11/the-cbc-news-is-too-too-funny-today.html


    Tuesday, 2 November 2021


    The CBC News is Too Too Funny today Methinks the LIEbranos and CUPE could use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/protest-legislature-cupe-strike-1.6234204

     

    Thousands march to legislature in massive protest on Day 5 of CUPE strike

    Public-sector workers, supporters from across Canada gather outside as new session of legislature begins

    Busloads of participants arrived from across the country to join the demonstration, held on Day 5 of a strike by 22,000 provincial employees who are members of Canadian Union of Public Employees.

    CUPE leaders and workers from across Canada showed up in support of the New Brunswick workers.

    Police estimated several thousand participants were at the demonstration, which filled the lawn of the legislature and spilled onto the sidewalks. Noise from the gathering could be heard blocks away.

    As the provincial government resumed a session that had been adjourned in June, protesters chanted and blew noisemakers, and CUPE leaders gave speeches on the lawn of the legislature. 

    While police officers directed traffic that slowed to a crawl, demonstrators set up dozens of empty tables, signalling they were ready to get back to the bargaining table.

       An aerial view of the demonstration at the legislature. (Mikael Mayer/Radio-Canada)

    On Monday afternoon, the Higgs government cancelled a planned speech from the throne that would have kicked off a new session of the legislature Tuesday.

    The move made it easier for the province to introduce and quickly pass back-to-work legislation to end the strike by the Canadian Union of Public Employees, something Premier Blaine Higgs has been talking about for days. 

    Higgs told reporters Monday afternoon that a bill would not come Tuesday but could happen at any time, depending on how the strike affects health-care services.

    The strike involves 22,000 government workers in 10 locals, including health care, education, transportation and agricultural sectors, as well as social workers, jail guards, court stenographers and staff at WorkSafeNB and New Brunswick community colleges.

    With files from Mrinali Anchan

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.com/2021/11/cupe-locked-out-workers-marches-towards.html

     

    Tuesday, 2 November 2021

    C.U.P.E. Locked out Workers marches towards the New Brunswick Legislatur...

     



     

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/higgs-cupe-pension-labour-strike-1.6234521

     

    Higgs wants striking employees to be willing to discuss pension changes

    On Day 5 of government employees' strike, N.B. premier says province could return to bargaining table soon

    Higgs and his government were pounded inside the legislature by opposition parties and outside by a large, noisy throng of striking CUPE members and supporters as the legislature reconvened for the first time since June.

    The labour dispute dominated Question Period, with the Liberals and Greens pressing him to move quickly to make a deal.

    "This is not a chicken dance," Opposition Liberal Leader Roger Melanson said, referring to the premier's onstage gyrations during New Brunswick Day celebrations in August. "This is serious."

    Melanson accused the premier of dancing from position to position on the strike as well, threatening back-to-work legislation on the one hand while offering to talk on the other.

    "It's confusing, all over the place, disoriented, disorganized," he said.

    The government got a noisy welcome to the legislature on Tuesday by thousands of striking and locked-out public sector workers and supporters. (Jacques Poitras/CBC News)

    Higgs told reporters he is prepared to talk to CUPE. 

    "I'd be, certainly, be willing to do that," he said. "I'd expect that one way or the other there will be some discussions about next steps and that would be getting back to the table." 

    But he said if talks resume, "there's got to be an openness that it's because we're going to find a resolution, not because we spent two or three or four or five or six days on the picket line."

    The government and the union have made competing wage proposals only one percentage point apart. 

    A key sticking point is the premier's push to add the CUPE local representing school bus drivers to the province's shared-risk pension plan, a regime that relieves the province of having to top up pension shortfalls with taxpayer dollars.

    In return, Higgs is offering to bring 2,200 educational assistants into the plan, giving them a pension for the first time.

    He is accusing CUPE of resisting the shift to shared-risk for the bus drivers because the national parent union has been fighting shared-risk plans Canada-wide.

    Green Leader David Coon and Liberal Leader Roger Melanson both urged the premier to drop his insistence on talking about pension changes in these negotiations. (CBC)

    But opposition leaders say it's Higgs who is being stubborn.

    "Putting this pension issue on the table, which is only affecting two locals, is taking hostage the rest," Melanson said.

    Green Party leader David Coon urged Higgs to put the issue aside.

    "It's pure insanity that he's insisting that this pension issue be dealt with in the context of these negotiations," Coon said.

    "He's got to stop that, take it off the table. He'll be back to the table immediately if he does that and we'll have a fair wage settlement before the end of the week. I can guarantee you that." 

    Higgs said Tuesday there's been no further discussion about back-to-work legislation to force an end to the strike.

    But he said that if that happens, the bill will be far-reaching, imposing wage settlements not just on the more than 20,000 CUPE members in the current dispute but on 55,000 unionized public-sector employees.

    "Whatever we do with CUPE, it will apply to 55,000 employees," Higgs said, meaning "all unions. … It would be our wage mandate for government if we did that."

    He said that would include nurses, who have twice rejected tentative agreements this year.

    "If you look at legislation that has been put in on a wage bill anywhere in the country, you don't pick and choose. It is the wage bill for government."

    But he added, "It's not my goal to have a legislated wage mandate. That's not my goal. I certainly would like to have a negotiated settlement." 

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Jacques Poitras

    Provincial Affairs reporter

    Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.com/2021/11/striking-cupe-members-protesting-at.html 

     

    Monday, 1 November 2021

    Striking C.U.P.E Members protesting at the Chancery Place in Fredericton!!!


     

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:25:19 +0000
    Subject: RE: The CBC News is Too Too Funny today Methinks the
    LIEbranos and CUPE could use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Petitpas Taylor, Ginette - M.P."<Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 16:23:51 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: The CBC News is Too Too Funny today Methinks
    the LIEbranos and CUPE could use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross
    Wetmore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for writing.

    While our office receives a tremendous volume of correspondence, as a
    Member of Parliament, I appreciate all feedback, positive or negative,
    on the issues of the day and my team and I carefully track what is on
    the minds of my constituents.

    However, because I was elected to serve the people of
    Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, priority will be given to correspondence
    from my constituency.

    As such, if you haven`t already done so, we appreciate you including
    your home address, postal code and telephone number in emails, as it
    helps us better respond to messages or inquiries that require
    follow-up.

    In addition, while we have entered an election period, my constituency
    team is still here to serve you and to provide assistance to my
    constituents of Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe.

    However, if you`re looking to reach out to me to discuss policy issues
    related to the election, I encourage you to reach out to my campaign
    team directly.

    Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.

    Regards,

    Ginette
     ______________________________

    _______________________________________________________________

    Bonjour,

    Je vous remercie d’avoir écrit.

    Bien que notre bureau reçoive un volume considérable de
    correspondance, en tant que députée, j’apprécie tous les commentaires,
    positifs ou négatifs, sur les questions d’actualité et mon équipe et
    moi-même suivons attentivement ce qui est dans l’esprit de mes
    électeurs.

    Toutefois, comme j’ai été élue pour servir les gens de
    Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, la priorité sera accordée à la
    correspondance provenant de ma circonscription.

    Par conséquent, si vous ne l’avez pas déjà fait, nous vous remercions
    d’inclure votre adresse personnelle, votre code postal et votre numéro
    de téléphone dans les courriels, car cela nous aide à mieux répondre
    aux messages ou aux demandes de renseignements qui nécessitent un
    suivi.

    De plus, bien que nous soyons entrés dans une période électorale,
    l’équipe de ma circonscription est toujours là pour vous servir et
    pour aider mes électeurs de Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe.
    Si vous cherchez à me contacter pour discuter des questions de
    politique liées à l’élection, je vous encourage à contacter
    directement mon équipe de campagne.

    Encore une fois, merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

    Cordialement,

    Ginette

     
     

    Higgs once praised 'fair' union wages he now says are too high

    In real terms, wages were higher six years ago following increases Higgs himself approved

    He praised the higher rates at the time as "fair to both employees and taxpayers." 

    That's not the position he has taken recently as the labour dispute that has pitted thousands of New Brunswick government employees in multiple union locals against the province drags into its fifth day.

     A central issue in the confrontation, according to labour historian and University of New Brunswick professor emeritus David Frank, is what, if anything, should be done about the erosion of employee wages by inflation.

    "Do we want them to have good jobs ... or do we want services at the cheapest possible price?" Frank said in an interview with CBC News on Monday. 

    "Obviously there's a distinction, and CUPE's bargaining position is that real wages should not be going down in the face of inflation." 

    More than 20,000 unionized New Brunswick government employees in several CUPE locals are caught up in the labour dispute. (Patrick Lacelle/Radio-Canada)

    'It's easy to argue inflation': Higgs

    Last Friday, when the strike began, Higgs said that should not be a concern because public-sector wages and benefits are better than those available from private employers and can withstand some erosion.

    "The wages are very good in the public sector," Higgs told CBC News, in explaining why matching the cost of living is not an issue he sympathizes with.

    "I know it's easy to argue inflation," he said. "But it's where you start. And what I'm seeing here is that they're starting at a very strong level."

    Higgs appeared to blame previous New Brunswick governments for letting employee wages escalate, even though he had a direct hand in guiding the issue for several years.

    As finance minister in the former Progressive Conservative government of David Alward, Higgs was involved in approving wage rates he now complains are too high, even though in real terms they are lower now than where he left them.   

    In June 2013, the Alward government signed a four-year deal with hospital workers in CUPE Local 1252, one of the unions involved in the current fight. That deal involved a two-year wage freeze, followed by two years of two-per-cent increases.

    The contract expired in June 2015 after the Alward government was defeated, and employee wages have shrunk significantly in real terms since then, due to inflation.  

    Local 1252 signed another four-year agreement after 2015 with the former Liberal government of Brian Gallant that included a series of raises totalling 4.1 per cent.

    But the Consumer Price Index in New Brunswick has increased 13.5 per cent since then.

    That makes the 2014 and 2015 wage levels for CUPE Local 1252, set during Higgs's term as finance minister, richer than current levels.

    CUPE New Brunswick president Steve Drost says government employees' wages have been eroded in recent years by inflation. (Jacques Poitras/CBC News)

    Similar case for educational workers

    It's a similar case with educational workers in CUPE Local 2745, who are also caught up in the current fight.

    They struck a four-year deal with the Alward government in 2011, with wages Higgs praised at the time as reasonable for all sides. Their wage rates are less now in real terms than they were when that contract expired in 2015.

    "The key aspect of this agreement, from our perspective, is that it respects the wage restraint policy which provides for two years of zero increases followed by two-per-cent increases in each of the final two years," Higgs said at the time.

    "By working collaboratively in this negotiation process, both parties have proven that we can reach an agreement that is fair to our valued public servants while still respecting New Brunswick's fiscal challenges."

    Higgs has not said why wages he once hailed as fair are now thought to be too high, especially after being shrunk by inflation. But David Frank said the view the public ultimately takes on the wage issue will play a big role in which side backs down.

    "Public responses to those two visions perhaps will have some effect on what government and the unions decide to do," Frank said.

    CUPE is asking for a combined 12 per cent wage increase over four years.

    The province briefly offered 10 per cent over five years, but reduced it to 8.5 per cent when union negotiators declined the offer.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Robert Jones

    Reporter

    Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
     
     
     
     
     

    Province wrong to stop paying EAs designated essential during strike, board rules

    Board sided with educational assistants' union after it filed a complaint against New Brunswick government

    Over the weekend, the province locked out all non-essential EAs, who are part of a strike by thousands of provincial government employees that began Friday. Striking employees do not get paid.

    But when the province decided to have students learn from home, the 45 per cent of EAs designated essential and therefore unable to join the strike were asked to stay home without pay.

    The labour board decided this was against the law and asked the province to cease and desist immediately.

    An order says refusing to allow essential EAs to work, and refusing to pay them, is against labour law.

    In a post on Facebook, CUPE Local 2745 said lawyers for the union made their case at a virtual hearing Monday afternoon. The union says designated workers could return to their workplace Tuesday.

    But Education Minister Dominic Cardy is asking EAs not to go to school. He said teachers and students are working from home because with custodians out, cleaning standards cannot be maintained.

    "We're asking them not to come to work, that the labour board ... ruling absolutely stands, so their pay isn't affected at all," he told Information Morning Fredericton.

    He did not say why the province was not paying essential EAs, but said the education system will try to integrate them into home learning.

    "We have to make sure that we have to be able to integrate them into something we can do to help support home learning, if that ends up being possible," he said.

    Cardy previously said the 1,700 EAs designated essential would not be enough to keep children learning well from schools, and the province has ordered all schools to teach remotely because CUPE's strike schedule has been "unpredictable."

    'In it to win it'

    Local 2745 president Theresa McAllister said that over the weekend, the designated EAs received an email saying "there was no work available for them to do," since students will be learning remotely. That's when CUPE decided to file the complaint.

    McAllister said the union asked workers to go into schools Tuesday, but their respective schools said stay home and you will be paid.

    McAllister said the favourable decision has boosted morale for those on the picket lines.

    "It has really boosted their spirits, that we're in it to win it," she said in an interview.

    With files from Information Morning Fredericton

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
     
     
     
     

    Ordering CUPE back to work won't be a simple process for Higgs, says labour lawyer

    Premier is threatening to create back-to-work legislation for at least some CUPE workers

    Premier Blaine Higgs says he's looking at back-to-work legislation that would order some or all striking members of the Canadian Union of Public Employees to end their walkout.

    But that route is not a simple one. Nor is the premier's other option: using the province's COVID-19 state of emergency.

    No provincial government in Canada has used back-to-work legislation since 2015, when the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the right to strike is protected by the Constitution, says Ottawa labour lawyer Paul Champ.

    "No one has tried it," he says. "I'm sure government lawyers across the country have looked at it and decided to step away, and I'd be interested to see if New Brunswick thinks somehow that they can get away with it." 

    Paul Champ, an Ottawa lawyer who specializes in labour law, says no government in Canada has attempted back-to-work legislation since the Supreme Court ruled in 2015 that the right to strike is protected. (Jean Delisle/ CBC)

    The 2015 ruling quashed the Saskatchewan government's attempt to unilaterally decide which unionized workers were essential and then ban them from striking.

    "The right to strike is an essential part of a meaningful collective bargaining process in our system of labour relations," it said. "It is an indispensable component of that right."

    Champ says that means any government seeking to restrict that right "is going to have an uphill battle to try to justify it."

    Another obstacle is timing.

    The government swept away one time-gobbling obstacle Monday by cancelling the speech from the throne scheduled for Tuesday.

        In 2015, the Supreme Court quashed an effort by Saskatchewan to unilaterally declare striking workers essential. (Justin Tang/The Canadian Press)

    That also means no Official Opposition reply to the speech Thursday, freeing up two days for regular business.

    "Not having a throne speech does give us additional flexibility that allows us to move quicker as needed," Higgs said Monday, though he said there would be no bill introduced Tuesday.  

    Still, any bill must be read and voted on three times and must also go through a committee review.

    And under the legislature's rules, each of those four steps must happen on a different sitting day.

    The only way that timeline can be further compressed is if all MLAs grant unanimous consent to bypass the rules, something Green Party house leader Kevin Arseneau says will not happen.

    Green Party house leader Kevin Arseneau says his party would not agree to speeding up the process of a back-to-work bill. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

    "Absolutely not," he says. "There will be no unanimous consent for back-to-work legislation. Absolutely not." 

    Arseneau says on top of refusing to consent to accelerating the timeline, the Greens are also looking at other procedural tools to slow it down.

    "There's many different ways of slowing down or putting pressure on bills," Arseneau says. 

    If a bill is eventually passed, it will likely be subject to a legal challenge based on the 2015 Saskatchewan case, Champ says.

    Higgs said Monday that a back-to-work bill would also include a "wage mandate" to impose pay increases on CUPE rather than sending that issue to binding arbitration. 

    Premier Blaine Higgs says his government could use the emergency order to force striking employees back to work if the strike impacts health-care services. (Government of New Brunswick)

    He also said another option is the Emergency Measures Act, which says the province can "provide for the maintenance and restoration of essential facilities" during an emergency.

    That would apply only narrowly to "more specific" situations that affect pandemic efforts, he said.

    The emergency order is also subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and Champ says applying it to only a very narrow number of health workers would be the only way it would have a chance of surviving a court challenge.

    But even then, he says the province may have a hard time.

    Clerical and housekeeping staff who had been working at regional health authority clinics are members of CUPE Local 1252 but were not designated essential, so they're able to strike.

    Norma Robinson of CUPE says the province has had plenty of time to seek redesignation of workers as essential but has never done so. (CBC)

    The designation of essential workers happened before the clinics began operating, and CUPE has not agreed to change the designation now that the strike is underway.

    CUPE 1252 president Norma Robinson said the dispute has been on the horizon for months and the province didn't approach the union about redesignation until the last few days.

    "They had lots of time," she said.

    The government could also have asked the New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board by now for a redesignation, Champ says.

    "If New Brunswick was running into a potential labour dispute some time ago and they had a designated worker list that was pre-COVID, I would think it would have been incumbent on the government to bring such an application before the labour board before they reach a situation of crisis."

    Because it hasn't done so, he says it will be hard to argue during any legal challenge that the province had no choice but to use a back-to-work bill or the emergency order to force those workers back to work.

    Corrections

    • An earlier version of this story said no government in Canada has used back-to-work legislation since 2015. This was based on erroneous information from Paul Champ. In fact the federal government passed back-to-work legislation in 2018 to stop rotating strikes by the Canadian Union of Postal Workers. That legislation was challenged by CUPW using the 2015 Supreme Court ruling. The case remains before the courts.
      Nov 02, 2021 12:11 PM AT

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Jacques Poitras

    Provincial Affairs reporter

    Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
     
     
     
     
     

    Higgs government cancels throne speech, but rules out back-to-work bill Tuesday

    Move could allow government to bring in back-to-work legislation quicker

    The move would make it easier for the province to introduce and quickly pass back-to-work legislation to end the strike by the Canadian Union of Public Employees, something Premier Blaine Higgs has been talking about for days. 

    "Clearly the government is improvising in trying to get this back-to-work legislation as quick as possible," said Green Party house leader Kevin Arseneau. "What it signals is there's absolutely no willingness to get back to the table." 

    Higgs told reporters Monday afternoon that a bill would not come Tuesday but could happen at any time, depending on how the strike affects health-care services.

    "It's going to be a day-by-day thing, but … not having a throne speech does give us additional flexibility that allows us to move quicker as needed." 

    Speaker Bill Oliver notified MLAs on Monday afternoon that he was cancelling an 11 a.m. sitting that would have prorogued the existing session, a necessary step before the new session could start with the throne speech.

    The speech drafted by the government and delivered by Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy had been scheduled for 1 p.m.

    But Oliver's notice says MLAs will convene instead at 1 p.m. "for the purpose of resuming" the existing session.

    Under house rules, no legislation can be introduced on a day set aside for a throne speech or for the Official Opposition's reply to the speech, which would have taken place Thursday.

    Now Tuesday and Thursday are both freed up for regular sitting days, which shortens the time required to get urgent legislation passed.

    Any bill before the legislature must be read and voted on three times and must also go through a committee review.

    Each of the four steps must happen on separate sitting days unless all MLAs consent unanimously to waive that rule, something Arseneau said Monday his party will not agree to.

    "Absolutely not," he said. "There will be no unanimous consent for back-to-work legislation. Absolutely not."

    Some COVID-19 vaccination clinics and testing centres have been closed as a result of the strike.

    More than 20,000 unionized public-sector workers in 10 different CUPE locals have been without contracts for years. The first workers walked off the job on Friday, with others joining them on the weekend.

    Higgs said on the weekend that the COVID impact was a possible trigger for back-to-work legislation or an emergency order.

    "CUPE is saying, 'It's all right for New Brunswickers to go without screening during a pandemic,'" he said. "They're saying they're willing to allow potential symptomatic and positive individuals to go into vulnerable locations and cause further infections. 

    "I don't think that is right, and I don't think New Brunswickers think it is right either."

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
      
     
     
    185 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story.
     
     
    Raymond Leger
    Sad state of affairs we have here in New Brunswick
     
     
    Johnny Lawrence
    Reply to @Raymond Leger: different day, same old drivel.
     
     
    Al Clark
    Reply to @Raymond Leger: an alias for Amos. Broken record. 
     
    TOO TOO FUNNY METHINKS I SHOULD TRUST THAT EVERYODY KNOWS IT AIN'T ME BABE BEAUSE UNLIKE THE SPINDOCTORS I ALWAY POST IN MY TRUE NAME N'ESY PAS?
     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2021 13:23:45 -0300
    Subject: The CBC News is Too Too Funny today Methinks the LIEbranos
    and CUPE could use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?
    To: Stephendrost1418@gmail.com, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
    "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Roger.L.Melanson"
    <roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
    fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca,
    Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca, jesse@viafoura.com,
    news@dailygleaner.com, nben@nben.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
    dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, jeff.carr@gnb.ca,
    oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
    Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca, Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca,
    megan.mitton@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca,
    steve.murphy@ctv.ca, nick.brown@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca,
    michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, carl.davies@gnb.ca,
    Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca, ron.tremblay2@gmail.com,
    Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
    philippe@dunsky.com, Steven_Reid3@carleton.ca,
    darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca, "sylvie.gadoury"
    <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
    <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, pchamp@champlaw.ca, "hugh.flemming"
    <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/higgs-union-wages-cupe-strike-1.6233433

    Higgs once praised 'fair' union wages he now says are too high

    In real terms, wages were higher six years ago following increases
    Higgs himself approved
    Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Nov 02, 2021 7:00 AM AT


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brunswick-labour-board-cupe-strike-1.6233697

    Province wrong to stop paying EAs designated essential during strike,
    board rules

    Board sided with educational assistants' union after it filed a
    complaint against New Brunswick government
    Hadeel Ibrahim · CBC News · Posted: Nov 02, 2021 10:36 AM AT


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/cupe-back-to-work-higgs-1.6233141

    Ordering CUPE back to work won't be a simple process for Higgs, says
    labour lawyer

    Premier is threatening to create back-to-work legislation for at least
    some CUPE workers
    Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Nov 02, 2021 8:00 AM AT


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/throne-speech-cancelled-nb-1.6232865

    Higgs government cancels throne speech, but rules out back-to-work bill Tuesday

    Move could allow government to bring in back-to-work legislation quicker
    Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Nov 01, 2021 2:40 PM AT


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:15:10 -0400
    Subject: 333 Too Too Funny Methinks the LIEbranos could use a little
    Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?
    To: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
    Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:04:17 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Too Too Funny Methinks the LIEbranos could
    use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Merci encore pour votre courriel.



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:04:19 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Too Too Funny Methinks the LIEbranos could
    use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

    If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
    support, please contact our Customer Service department at
    1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

    If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
    publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

    Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

    This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
    press releases.



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Harrison, Wanda"<WHarrison@nbpower.com>
    Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:04:16 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: EXT -  Too Too Funny Methinks the LIEbranos
    could use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    I am currently out of the office with no access to my email.

    Please contact Joanne Regan at jregan@nbpower.com or 458-3711 for any issues.

    Thank you


    ________________________________
    This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
    intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
    addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
    you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
    retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
    other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
    strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
    contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
    and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
    appreciated.
    Le pr?sent courriel (y compris toute pi?ce jointe) s'adresse
    uniquement ? son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
    organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privil?gi?s ou
    confidentiels. Si vous n'?tes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
    interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
    diss?miner, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
    fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre fa?on. Si vous avez re?u le
    pr?sent courriel par erreur, pri?re de communiquer avec l'exp?diteur
    et d'?liminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
    ?lectronique ou imprim?e de celui-ci, imm?diatement. Nous sommes
    reconnaissants de votre collaboration.






    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:04:20 +0000
    Subject: RE: Too Too Funny Methinks the LIEbranos could use a little
    Deja Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    comments.

    Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    commentaires.


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 20:04:13 -0400
    Subject: Too Too Funny Methinks the LIEbranos could use a little Deja
    Vu N'esy Pas Ross Wetmore?
    To: mike.holland@gnb.ca, wharrison@nbpower.com, gthomas@nbpower.com,
    Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca, jesse@viafoura.com,
    news@dailygleaner.com, nben@nben.ca, premier@gnb.ca,
    blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
    Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, jeff.carr@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
    andre@jafaust.com, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
    Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
    David.Coon@gnb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
    sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
    nick.brown@gnb.ca, robert.mckee@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
    Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
    michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca, carl.davies@gnb.ca,
    carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Cathy.Rogers@gnb.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
    roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca, Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca,
    ron.tremblay2@gmail.com, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, premier@ontario.ca
    Cc: philippe@dunsky.com, Steven_Reid3@carleton.ca,
    motomaniac333@gmail.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
    Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/01/mlas-executive-assistant-charged-with.html

    Tuesday, 21 January 2020

    MLA's executive assistant charged with assault of provincial employee

    https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

    David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
    Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
    Too Too Funny Methinks the LIEbranos could use a little Deja Vu N'esy Pas?

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/charges-dropped-against-liberal-mla-1.768948

     #nbpoli #cdnpoli

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/wetmore-douthwright-assault-road-worker-highway-mclaughlan-1.5434988


     

    Charges dropped against Liberal MLA

    The charges against a Liberal MLA accused of allegedly punching a Conservative party employee have been dropped.

    The charges were dropped by the Crown prosecution on Wednesday after it was heard in the Fredericton provincial court that Chris Collins, the representative for Moncton East, had fulfilled conditions of an alternative-measures program by doing community service.

    Collins allegedly got into a confrontation with another man, who works for the Conservative party, at the Back Nine Bar on Dec. 19 and allegedly struck him several times. Collins was later charged with summary assault.

    In a written statement in January, Collins apologized for his actions, saying, "I deeply regret allowing myself to become involved in such an incident. It was completely out of character for me."

    Collins is a former Moncton city councillor. He was elected to the provincial riding of Moncton East in March 2007 byelection after former premier Bernard Lord resigned from politics.

    Collins' 12-year-old son Sean died of cancer in July 2007.

    The alternative-measures program sometimes allows citizens without a criminal record to take alternative actions with the victim and the community to promote reconciliation and avoid acquiring a record.

    The court heard Collins performed volunteer work with a charitable group and completed the terms of the program on June 11.

    The prosecution was brought in from Nova Scotia because of Collins's position in the government.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices




    MLA's executive assistant charged with assault of provincial employee

    Shawn Douthwright is scheduled to make an appearance in Moncton court on Friday

    Shawn Douthwright, the executive assistant to Agriculture, Aquaculture and Fisheries Minister Ross Wetmore, is being charged with assaulting a provincial road worker.

    Court documents say the alleged assault on Scott McLaughlan took place on July 4, 2019, near Second North River, about 28 kilometres west of Moncton. The documents were filed Dec. 27.

    McLaughlan could not be reached by CBC News for a comment, but CUPE 1190 laid out the allegations, quoting union member McLaughlan, in a news release last November. 

    The release said Wetmore and Douthwright drove up to a Department of Transportation roadside work site along Route 112, where McLaughlan and other workers were gathered.

    Agriculture Minister MLA Ross Wetmore, who the union says was present for the alleged assault by his executive assistant, has said little about it. (Philip Drost/CBC News)

    Wetmore "shouted at us, insulted us, using derogatory words and saying road workers were incompetent," McLaughlan is quoted as saying.

    The union accused both the Progressive Conservative MLA for Gagetown-Petitcodiac and his assistant of insulting the employees. The release went on to allege that the situation escalated when Douthwright grabbed McLaughlin by the shoulders and shouted an expletive at him.

    Union president Brent Wiggins alleged this was not an isolated incident and said in the release that there has been "repeated harassment" of highway workers by Wetmore.

    When reached by the CBC, Douthwright replied in an email: "I look forward to telling my story in the proper venue. I have no comment at this time."

    Communications director Vicky Deschênes said there would be no comment from the province because "it would be inappropriate to discuss a matter before the courts."

    But the alleged assault was addressed in the legislature on three separate occasions late last year. 

    Robert McKee, the Liberal MLA for Moncton Centre, broached the issue on Nov. 22, 2019, when he outlined the allegations during question period and said, "we would like to give the minister an opportunity to give his side of the story to the house here this morning."

    Liberal MLA Lisa Harris questioned Wetmore in the legislature in November, asking if he would step down. (Joe McDonald/CBC)

    To which Wetmore replied, in part, "I've been told that this has been forwarded to the RCMP, so right at the time being I'll have no comment."

    McKee then asked Wetmore if he would be willing to step down from cabinet until the matter was fully resolved.

    Wetmore answered by saying: "This is an HR [human resources] issue that has been dealt with, and I have no intention of commenting any more until this has been concluded with the RCMP."

    McKee accused Wetmore of deflecting and then asked Premier Blaine Higgs about removing Wetmore from his position.

    Asked in the legislature to clarify how the matter was dealt with and about any consequences for Wetmore and Douthwright, Premier Blaine Higgs said he could not respond because of privacy issues. (CBC)

    "I can't speak of the particulars of that situation, but I am under the understanding it has been fully dealt with," said Higgs, who said that because of privacy issues, he wasn't free to discuss what happened.

    The next week, questions persisted from the Liberals. Lisa Harris, the Miramichi Bay-Neguac MLA, asked the premier specifically how the matter was dealt with and what consequences there were for Wetmore and Douthwright.

    Wetmore responded again that it was a human resources issue, and anyone wanting to know more should file an access to information request with the province. 

    He then spoke about his success as a minister, a response that surprised Harris.

    "Mr. Speaker, it is unreal that the member opposite would switch the conversation when we are talking about a serious allegation." 

    Liberal MLA Rob McKee asked for specifics surrounding the assault allegations. (CBC)

    She again asked if Wetmore would be stepping down.

    Higgs replied: "I agree with the member. It is not acceptable. It is not acceptable to have any type of abusive situation, whether it be physical or verbal. We would not tolerate it, and we did not."

    He then suggested someone had been disciplined.

    "We feel that the disciplinary action was suitable for the situation and that it was done promptly," Higgs said.

    But he did not say what disciplinary action was taken.

    Higgs said if the RCMP were to investigate, his government would co-operate.

    An investigation by the RCMP resulted in a charge of assault against Douthwright. He is scheduled for a first appearance in a Moncton court on Friday. 

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

     

     

    I just called your Commission AGAIN As I said something smelled very fishy in NB about uranium Anne McLellan and Alan Graham long ago

    $
    0
    0
     

    Point Lepreau webinar

    Join the CNSC on November 16, 2021, for a webinar on the Point Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station, operated by New Brunswick Power (NB Power).

    This webinar will provide information about NB Power’s application to renew its nuclear facility operating licence for a 25 year period, with no proposed changes to current operations or consideration of new nuclear projects. The existing licence will expire on June 30, 2022.

    The purpose of this webinar is to:

    • provide information on NB Power’s renewal application
    • provide information on specific safety and control areas
    • explain how the public, Indigenous groups and potential intervenors can participate in the upcoming hearings on January 26 and May 11–12, 2022

    Join the webinar

    Deadline to register: November 15 at noon (EST)

    This webinar will be hosted in English and French. Space is limited, so register in advance using the links below. When you register, you will receive a confirmation email with login details for the webinar.

    English session: November 16
    Time: 10:30 am to noon (AST)
    9:30 am to 11 am (EST)

    Register

    Questions

    The CNSC welcomes questions prior to the webinar.

    Submit your question

    Related links

     

     
     

    Public Commission hearings

    Please note that until further notice, all Commission proceedings will be held remotely.

    We continue to monitor the pandemic situation and are focusing on critical services to ensure that nuclear facilities are safe and that the public and environment are protected.

    The Commission makes decisions on the licensing of major nuclear facilities through a public hearing process.

    The public hearing gives involved parties and members of the public an opportunity to be heard before the Commission. Following a public hearing, the Commission deliberates and makes its decision on the matter. The Commission renders decisions according to service standards, depending on the nature and complexity of the files. The Commission also holds public meetings.

    One-part or two-part hearings

    Commission hearings are governed by Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Rules of Procedure, under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act. Public hearings usually take place in a one or two-part process. Two-part public hearings take place on days that are usually 60 days apart. Most decisions involving major nuclear facilities are made through the two-part public hearing process.

    One-part public hearing process

    For a one-part hearing, all of the evidence from the applicant, CNSC staff and intervenors is heard by the Commission in a single hearing session. To allow potential intervenors to review the proposal and prepare for the hearing, written submissions from the applicant and CNSC staff must be filed at least 60 days prior to the hearing day.

    Intervenors are then invited to register their submissions at least 30 days prior to the hearing. Participants may file supplementary information up to seven days prior to the hearing day.

    Commission hearings are normally open to the public, but some are also be held in-camera (closed session) in whole or in part. For example, certain protected information may not be discussed in a public forum.

    During a public hearing, simultaneous interpretation in one or the other of Canada's official languages is provided when necessary. Verbatim transcripts are produced and published on CNSC’s website the week following each hearing day. The Commission's decision and its reasons for decision are normally published within six weeks after the conclusion of the hearing.

    Two-part public hearing process

    During Part 1 of a two-part public hearing, the applicant and CNSC staff present written and oral submissions to the Commission and respond to questions from the Commission. 

    As with a one-part hearing, intervenors are invited to register their submissions at least 30 days prior to the hearing. Participants may file supplementary information up to seven days prior to the hearing day.

    During Part 2, which usually takes place 60 days after Part 1, registered intervenors have an opportunity to make their views known to the Commission and to respond to any related questions from the Commission Members.

    Usually, 30 days before Hearing Part 2, intervenors may file their intervention requests and submissions.  This means that intervenors have 30 days to review the information presented during Part 1 and submit their request before Part 2.

    The applicant and CNSC staff must also attend Part 2 and be prepared to respond to further questioning by the Commission. 

    How the CNSC chooses where to hold Commission hearings

    In the spirit of openness and transparency, the CNSC prides itself on holding Commission hearings in the communities that will be most affected by the decision at hand, when possible.

    When considering a hearing location, the CNSC looks for available venues (such as hotels, conference centres and recreation facilities) that meet its requirements for proximity to the relevant nuclear facility. Local municipalities and tourism associations are also contacted in an attempt to find an optimal location that can accommodate the hearing’s duration, the expected number of intervenors, and the necessary technical services. In addition, the CNSC insists that the location be wheelchair accessible.

    Watch a public Commission hearing or meeting

    CNSC offers online videos, or webcasts, of its public hearings and meetings.  If you are interested in learning about what happens at a public hearing or meeting, watch public Commission hearings or meetings online.

    Participate in a public Commission hearing

    Members of the public are welcome to observe hearings or to formally participate as intervenors. Find out more on how to participate in a public Commission hearing.

    For more information

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 18:17:11 -0300
    Subject: I just called again
    To: interventions@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:24:58 -0300
    Subject: I just called your Commission. As I said somethng smells very
    fishy in NB about uranium Anne McLellan and Alan Graham
    To: interventions@cnsc-ccsn.gc.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 00:03:42 -0300
    Subject: Attn Ms. Jordan Mr. Pope I will likely be calling your office
    again tomorrow (207) 626-3800 & (603) 271-2231
    To: Anne.H.Jordan@maine.gov, Christopher.Pope@hsem.nh.gov

    http://www.maine.gov/dps/admin.htm

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:48:04 -0300
    Subject: Attn Patrick Murphy ans Duane Ingram I just called again and
    tried to reason with you and got the usual run around have a lawyer
    call 506 756 8687
    To: PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, DUANE.INGRAM@cbsa-asfc.gc.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 16:55:16 -0300
    Subject: Some lawyer within Financiere Banque Nationale and Fidelity
    Investments should call me back now EH Gilles Duceppe? 506 756 8687
    To: john.thompson@greatermoncton.org, denis.dube@nbc.ca,
    Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, cs.english@fmr.com
    Cc: Carrie.C@parl.gc.ca, Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
    Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, cmteweb@parl.gc.ca,
    marcom@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, david.allgood@rbc.com,
    mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca

    Clearly I am raising a little Financial Hell on both sides of the
    border and overseas as well much to the former liberal David Emerson's
    chagrin of that I have no doubt.

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos

    QSLS Politics
    By Location  Visit Detail
    Visit 2,150
    Domain Name   state.ma.us ? (U.S.)
    IP Address   170.63.96.# (Massachusetts Department of Revenue)
    ISP   Massachusetts Department of Revenue
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  United States  (Facts)
    State  :  Massachusetts
    City  :  Boston
    Lat/Long  :  42.3425, -71.0677 (Map)
    Language   English (U.S.)
    en-us
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Internet Explorer 6.0
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)
    Javascript   version 1.3
    Monitor   Resolution  :  800 x 600
    Color Depth  :  32 bits
    Time of Visit   May 29 2008 7:15:09 pm
    Last Page View   May 29 2008 7:20:22 pm
    Visit Length   5 minutes 13 seconds
    Page Views   2
    Referring URL  http://www.google.co...
    chusetts&btnG=Search
    Search Engine  google.com
    Search Words  david amos, massachusetts
    Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....
    eblower-part-1b.html
    Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....
    leblower-part-4.html
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-5:00
    Visitor's Time   May 29 2008 1:15:09 pm
    Visit Number   2,150


    Just Dave
    By Location  Visit Detail
    Visit 4,482
    Domain Name   (Unknown)
    IP Address   209.5.96.# (Financiere Banque Nationale)
    ISP   Rogers Telecom
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
    State/Region  :  Quebec
    City  :  Montreal
    Lat/Long  :  45.5, -73.5833 (Map)
    Language   English (Canada)
    en-ca
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Internet Explorer 6.0
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
    1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727)
    Javascript   version 1.3
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1280 x 1024
    Color Depth  :  32 bits
    Time of Visit   May 29 2008 1:34:40 pm
    Last Page View   May 29 2008 1:34:40 pm
    Visit Length   0 seconds
    Page Views   1
    Referring URL  http://www.blogger.com/profile/7645241
    Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
    Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-4:00
    Visitor's Time   May 29 2008 1:34:40 pm
    Visit Number   4,482

    Just Dave
    By Location  Visit Detail
    Visit 4,467
    Domain Name   fmr.com ? (Commercial)
    IP Address   192.223.243.# (Fidelity Investments)
    ISP   Fidelity Investments
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  United States  (Facts)
    State  :  Massachusetts
    City  :  Boston
    Lat/Long  :  42.3425, -71.0677 (Map)
    Language   English (U.S.)
    en-us
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Internet Explorer 6.0
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR
    1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; InfoPath.1)
    Javascript   version 1.3
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
    Color Depth  :  32 bits
    Time of Visit   May 28 2008 12:13:41 pm
    Last Page View   May 28 2008 12:13:41 pm
    Visit Length   0 seconds
    Page Views   1
    Referring URL  http://www.google.co...nd%2C ma&btnG=Search
    Search Engine  google.com
    Search Words  "peter h. collins" construction townsend, ma
    Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-
    and-bush.html
    Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-
    and-bush.html
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-5:00
    Visitor's Time   May 28 2008 11:13:41 am
    Visit Number   4,467

    QSLS Politics
    By Location  Visit Detail
    Visit 2,154
    Domain Name   gov.bc.ca ? (Canada)
    IP Address   142.32.208.# (British Columbia Systems Corporation)
    ISP   British Columbia Systems Corporation
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
    State/Region  :  British Columbia
    City  :  Victoria
    Lat/Long  :  48.4333, -123.35 (Map)
    Language   English (U.S.)
    en-us
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Internet Explorer 6.0
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)
    Javascript   version 1.3
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
    Color Depth  :  32 bits
    Time of Visit   May 29 2008 8:37:11 pm
    Last Page View   May 29 2008 8:37:11 pm
    Visit Length   0 seconds
    Page Views   1
    Referring URL
    Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....email-
    to-ottawa.html
    Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....email-
    to-ottawa.html
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-8:00
    Visitor's Time   May 29 2008 11:37:11 am
    Visit Number   2,154


    Just Dave
    By Location  Visit Detail
    Visit 4,469
    Domain Name   (Unknown)
    IP Address   38.103.43.# (Performance Systems International)
    ISP   Performance Systems International
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  United States  (Facts)
    State  :  District of Columbia
    City  :  Washington
    Lat/Long  :  38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
    Language   English (U.K.)
    en-gb
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Firefox
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.12)
    Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12
    Javascript   version 1.5
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
    Color Depth  :  32 bits
    Time of Visit   May 28 2008 12:56:01 pm
    Last Page View   May 28 2008 12:58:31 pm
    Visit Length   2 minutes 30 seconds
    Page Views   3
    Referring URL  http://www.google.co...stinat&
    start=20&sa=N
    Search Engine  google.com
    Search Words  joe christinat
    Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-
    and-bush.html
    Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-
    and-bush.html
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-5:00
    Visitor's Time   May 28 2008 11:56:01 am
    Visit Number   4,469




    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:08:34 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Somebody should call me back now EH? 506 756 8687
    To: john.thompson@greatermoncton.org, denis.dube@nbc.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 15:32:23 -0300
    Subject: Somebody should call me back now EH? 506 756 8687
    To: pilgrimadv@publiccounsel.net,
    plymouthcountyprobatecourt@pcpfc.com, Worcesterba@publiccounsel.net,
    hampdenba@publiccounsel.net, franklinba@publiccounsel.net,
    ecbaa@aol.com, norfolkba@publiccounsel.net,
    bristolba@publiccounsel.net, jstone@mdalaw.org, mdalawrobyn@yahoo.com,
    Berkshireba@publiccounsel.net, barnstableba@publiccounsel.net
    ,
    hcba@crocker.com

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 17:36:34 -0300
    Subject: You tease me about smoking guns after my family has suffered
    through pure hell lady?
    To: contact@cindyforcongress.org

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:29:21 -0300
    Subject: Better yet call the Treasury Dept's IG
    To: benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 18:08:47 -0300
    Subject: For the record I called both of you guys to talk about Werner
    and got voicemail as usual
    To: jduncan@ecojustice.ca, jroberts@ecojustice.ca

    Then I called your mail line and got somebody who didn't care as usual.

    Well now welcome back to my world. Rest assured I don't care what
    planet your lawyers come from. They should understand how to come meet
    me in Federal Court someday if I demand that they testify to all that
    they know to be true so help them the god of their world EH?

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 15:49:22 -0300
    Subject: I just called you Mr. Houle
    To: marhoule@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca, cadoyle@nrcan-rncan.gc.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 14:00:19 -0300
    Subject: I just call you office to get the number of the Comittee that
    oversees the Office of Public Sector of Integrity
    To: cmteweb@parl.gc.ca, marcom@parl.gc.ca
    Cc: Carrie.C@parl.gc.ca, Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca, Casey.B@parl.gc.ca,
    david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca,
    Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca,
    alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca

    I am sending the three emails I promised. Rest assured that my
    concerns about the lack of Public Sector Integrity do not begin or end
    with the lack of integrity within the Ofice of Public Sector Integrity
    and should be of great concern to many Parliamentry committees and the
    Canadian People as a whole.

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos

    http://cmte.parl.gc.ca/cmte/CommitteeList.aspx?Lang=1&PARLSES=392&JNT=0&SELID=CONTACT&COM=13196

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 14:36:13 -0300
    Subject: Your recent success begs the obvious question Ivan. Are you
    and your brother readiy to take me on in Court or stand with me NOW???
    To: ivan.court@saintjohn.ca, mayor@saintjohn.ca, police@saintjohn.ca
    Cc: oldmaison@yahoo.com, danf@danf.net, citymanager@saintjohn.ca,
    legal@saintjohn.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:31:28 -0300
    Subject: Attn Sheila Fraser I have had enough of your malicious assistants
    To: communications@oag-bvg.gc.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 13:30:15 -0300
    Subject: Say Hello to Anthony fellas he hates it when I tape
    conversations I called you all and tried to explain Now I'll Cya'll in
    Court EH?
    To: b.carroll@sackville.com, paul.stapleton@fredericton.ca,
    chris.macpherson@fredericton.ca, rpenney@stjohns.ca,
    cao@annapoliscounty.ns.ca, owen.tobert@calgary.ca
    Cc: anthonyk@frederictonchamber.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 11:41:08 -0300
    Subject: Why not ask Byron Prior or Brian Mulroney, or George H. W,
    Bush or little Bernie Lord if you think I am a liar kid?
    To: Dan Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>
    Cc: oldmaison@yahoo.com

    http://www.scribd.com/full/2931800?access_key=key-5rj2bm49lsznvi2rcy5



    On 5/10/08, Dan Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net> wrote:
    > Amos, I saw Prior's videos before I contacted you.
    >
    > The Hathaway stuff is common knowledge, he got lenient sentencing
    > because of?
    >
    > I know the restraint needed not to say unprovable things are definite,
    > but I don't think it's too much to ask to be clearer in the message, i.e.:
    >
    > ONLY THE FOUR FELLAS THAT MET IN FAT FRED CITY TODAY COULD KNOW HOW BAD
    > THINGS TRULY ARE IN THE MARITIMES. CORRECT
    >
    > I'm honestly having trouble following the story without clearer
    > information - who what where when & why.
    >
    > P.S. You prior reactions made it very hard to broach further inquiry
    > into the matter.
    >
    > Best wishes,
    >
    > Dan F.
    >
    > David Amos wrote:
    >> Gypsy-blog
    >> By Location  Visit Detail
    >> Visit 22,977
    >> Domain Name   tiscali.nl ? (Netherlands)
    >> IP Address   82.169.82.# (Tiscali BV)
    >> ISP   Tiscali B.V.
    >> Location   Continent  :  Europe
    >> Country  :  Netherlands  (Facts)
    >> State/Region  :  Noord-Brabant
    >> City  :  Aalburg
    >> Lat/Long  :  51.75, 5.1333 (Map)
    >> Language   unknown
    >> Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    >> Browser   Firefox
    >> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.14)
    >> Gecko/20080404 Firefox/2.0.0.14
    >> Javascript   disabled
    >> Time of Visit   May 9 2008 10:14:21 pm
    >> Last Page View   May 9 2008 10:14:21 pm
    >> Visit Length   0 seconds
    >> Page Views   1
    >> Referring URL  unknown
    >> Visit Entry Page   http://gypsy-blog.bl...away-
    sentencing.html
    >> Visit Exit Page   http://gypsy-blog.bl...away-
    sentencing.html
    >> Out Click
    >> Time Zone   unknown
    >> Visitor's Time   Unknown
    >> Visit Number   22,977
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 23:59:26 -0300
    >> Subject: RE Justice and Freedom of Speech Danny Boy perhaps you should
    >> read the judgement with one of my emails today
    >> To: danf@danf.net
    >> Cc: oldmaison@yahoo.com
    >>
    >> Then read the rest of the email. It is within your own blog as well.
    >> You comment in mine I comment in yours turn about is fair play after
    >> particularly after what you said of me to others N'est Pas?
    >>
    >> http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.com/2008/03/curtis-hathaway-sentencing.html
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "Dan F."<noreply-comment@blogger.com>
    >> Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 18:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
    >> Subject: [Just Dave] New comment on Me and Bush.
    >> To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com
    >>
    >> Dan F. has left a new comment on the post "Me and Bush":
    >>
    >> Amos,
    >>
    >> I'll be honest with you - I don't have it in me to read through all
    >> your stuff.
    >>
    >> For those who want to hear your story, would you please write a
    >> medium-long length blog with as much of the story as possible in it?
    >>
    >> No pressure - best wishes.
    >>
    >> Post a comment:
    >> https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11475858&postID=111093368474666362&ext-ref=comm-sub-email
    >>
    >> Unsubscribe to comments for this post:
    >> http://www.blogger.com/comment-unsubscribe.g?blogID=11475858&postID=111093368474666362
    >>
    >> Posted by Dan F. to Just Dave at Friday, May 09, 2008
    >>
    >
    >



    2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt(1).pdf
    663K View as HTMLScan and download
    2 attachmentsScan and download all attachments

    SRIC Yankee Treasury Dept IG.wav
    179K Scan and download

     

    https://www.nbpower.com/en/about-us/news-media-centre/news/2018/nb-power-ceo-ga%C3%ABtan-thomas-appointed-chairman-of-the-atlanta-centre-governing-board-of-the-world-association-of-nuclear-operators/


    NB Power CEO Gaëtan Thomas appointed chairman of the Atlanta Centre
    Governing Board of the World Association of Nuclear Operators
    2018-05-14

    Fredericton, N.B. –  The World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO)
    announced the appointment of Gaëtan Thomas as the new Chairman of the
    WANO-Atlanta Centre Regional Governing Board.

     "I am pleased to announce the appointment of Gaëtan Thomas and
    welcome him to the Atlanta Centre Regional Governing Board and the
    wider WANO family. Gaëtan brings a wealth of experience and insight to
    the position, which will be very valuable to the global community of
    nuclear operators.”  said Jacques Regaldo, chairman of WANO.

    WANO, which has over 130 members across the globe, is the organization
    that unites every company and country in the world that operates
    commercial nuclear power plants. Its goal is to achieve the highest
    possible standards of nuclear safety and excellence in operational
    performance. WANO is headquartered in London and, in addition to the
    Atlanta Centre, which has 38 members, WANO also has regional centres
    in Moscow, Paris and Tokyo.

    “I am honoured to serve as Chairman of the Atlanta Centre and to work
    with all of our nuclear professionals around the world to continue to
    improve nuclear safety in our region and to represent our centre with
    the international organization,” said Mr. Thomas. “NB Power’s Point
    Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station has long been a WANO member and has
    benefited greatly from this professional association.”

    Mr. Thomas has served as Chief Executive Officer of NB Power since
    February 2010. He is an Electrical Engineering graduate from the
    University of New Brunswick. A lifelong employee of the utility, Mr.
    Thomas has worked in all aspects of the business including as vice
    president of both the Nuclear and Distribution and Customer Service
    divisions.

    In 2015 & 2016, Mr. Thomas was named by Atlantic Business Magazine as
    one of the region’s Top 50 CEOs, and was selected as one of the Most
    Influential Acadians by l’Acadie Nouvelle, New Brunswick’s French
    provincial daily newspaper.

    Media contact: Marc Belliveau, communications, NB Power, 506-458-4203.


    https://www.wano.info/about-us


    ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​The World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO) unites every company and country in the world that has an operating commercial nuclear power plant to achieve the highest possible standards of nuclear safety. 

     

    WANO appoints Robert Gambrill as Director of WANO Atlanta Centre 

    1

    WANO appoints Robert Gambrill as Director of WANO Atlanta Centre
    WANO has appointed Robert (Bob) Gambrill as the Director of the WANO Atlanta Centre. Bob has formally replaced Russ Brian, who has successfully completed his three year tenure as WANO Atlanta Centre Director.

    WANO Atlanta Centre is located in Atlanta, Georgia and provides services and assistance to WANO members in the United States, Mexico, Canada, South Africa, China, United Arab Emirates, and Romania.

    In carrying out the WANO mission to maximise the safety and reliability of commercial nuclear power plants worldwide and in addition to providing assistance to members within the region, Atlanta Centre also implements WANO strategic activities and goals, ensures effective application of WANO resources within the region and to other regional centres, and promotes the professional development of seconded personnel.

    In parallel to his position with WANO, Bob Gambrill is also serving as Vice President, International, for the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). INPO is an independent, non-profit organisation with a mission to promote the highest levels of safety and reliability in the operation of commercial nuclear power plants. 

    Robert Gambrill, the new Director at WANO Atlanta Centre, stated: “I am pleased to serve as Director of WANO Atlanta Centre and look forward to working closely with the WANO Leadership Team, so that together we can achieve our goals.”  

    Ingemar Engkvist, Chief Executive Officer at WANO, stated: “I am delighted that Bob has joined WANO, he joins us at a key moment in our history and I look forward to working closely with him and our Atlanta Centre colleagues to support our members and maximise safety and reliability across the world. I would also like to take this opportunity to wish Russ all the very best for his retirement and thank him for his dedicated service to WANO, INPO and to the global nuclear industry throughout his career.”
     

     

     
    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:31:40 -0400
    Subject: Re: RE KPMG & RCMP Need I say that I was not surprised to
    find out on Halloween that the lawyers of the Corrupt Crown Corp known
    as NB Power knew that my lawsuit in Federal Court had been dismised
    before I did?
    To: gathomas@nbpower.com, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>,
    "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
    <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "darrow.macintyre"
    <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
    "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, nmoore
    <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "jeremy.keefe"<jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>,
    "jennifer.warren"<jennifer.warren@cibc.com>, "Frank.McKenna"
    <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "len.hoyt"<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
    "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
    "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca,
    Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Furey, John"
    <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
    "andrew.baumberg"<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
    , "marc.giroux"
    <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "lise.henrie"
    <lise.henrie@cas-satj.gc.ca>, "Norman.Sabourin"
    <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
    >, ethics-ethique
    <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >, "Liliana.Longo"
    <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "Bill.Morneau"
    <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "bill.pentney"<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>,
    "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
    <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
    >, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
    "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
    "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "ralph.goodale"
    <ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>

    http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/re-kpmg-rcmp-need-i-say-that-i-was-not.html

    Wednesday, 17 January 2018
    RE KPMG & RCMP Need I say that I was not surprised to find out on
    Halloween that the lawyers of the Corrupt Crown Corp known as NB Power
    knew that my lawsuit in Federal Court had been dismissed before I did?

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-revenue-agency-records-kpmg-1.4113406


    CRA records missing in KPMG tax dodge affair
    Watchdog groups call for investigation after correspondence appears to
    have been deleted
    Harvey Cashore, Nicole Percy, Nicole McCormick, Kimberly Ivany,
    Patrick Butler · CBC News ·  May 18, 2017

     

     

     

     ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Anderson-Mason, Andrea Hon. (JAG/JPG)"<Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:36:35 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Marc.Belliveau Methinks just because you
    and CBC delete your Spin about Gaëtan Thomas the NB Power boss and his
    Nuclear buddies it does not follow that it is forgotten N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are
    greatly valued.  You can be assured that all emails and letters are
    carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.
    If your issue is Constituency related, please contact Lisa Bourque at
    my constituency office at
    Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca<mailto:Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca>  or  (506) 755-2810.
    Thank you.


    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations. Nous
    tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
    Si c’est au sujet du bureau de circonscription,  veuillez contacter
    Lisa Bourque  à  Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca<mailto:Lisa.Bourque@gnb.ca>  ou
    (506)755-2810.
    Merci.

    Andrea Anderson-Mason, Q.C. / c.r.

    ​​​​​


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
    Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:36:34 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Marc.Belliveau Methinks just because you
    and CBC delete your Spin about Gaëtan Thomas the NB Power boss and his
    Nuclear buddies it does not follow that it is forgotten N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
    Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

    Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
    note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
    that your message will be carefully reviewed.

    We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

    -------------------

    Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
    Justice et procureur général du Canada.

    En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
    prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
    votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
    avec soin.

    Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
    Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:36:34 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Marc.Belliveau Methinks just because you
    and CBC delete your Spin about Gaëtan Thomas the NB Power boss and his
    Nuclear buddies it does not follow that it is forgotten N'esy Pas?
    To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

    Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!

    This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
    know that every incoming email is read and reviewed.  A member of my
    Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
    follow-up is required.
    Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
    responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
    non-chain (or "forwards") variety.

    In your email, if you:

    ·         have verified that you are a constituent by including your
    complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
    will be provided in a timely manner.
    ·         have not included your residential postal mailing address,
    please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
    and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.

    If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
    contact your Member of Parliament.  If you are unsure who your MP is,
    you can find them by searching your postal code at
    http://www.ourcommons.ca/en

    Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
    attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
    1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
    voicemails will be returned promptly.

    Once again, thank you for your email.

    The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
    Wellington-Halton Hills
    toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
    Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
    E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<mailto:michael.chong@parl.gc.ca>
    Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://www.michaelchong.ca>

    THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
    AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
    CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
    notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
    copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
    strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
    received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
    delete this message from your system.




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 01:36:30 -0400
    Subject: Fwd: YO Marc.Belliveau Methinks just because you and CBC
    delete your Spin about Gaëtan Thomas the NB Power boss and his Nuclear
    buddies it does not follow that it is forgotten N'esy Pas?
    To: robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
    Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca,
    carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
    Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, srussell@nbpower.com,
    Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
    Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca, Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
    Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
    michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
    Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,
    mcu@justice.gc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, David.Eidt@gnb.ca,
    blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, andre@jafaust.com
    Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Roger.L.Melanson@gnb.ca,
    Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Austin, Kris (LEG)"<Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:12:36 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Marc.Belliveau Methinks just because you
    and CBC delete your Spin about Gaëtan Thomas the NB Power boss and his
    Nuclear buddies it does not follow that it is forgotten N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


    Thank you for your email.

    Please be assured that all emails and letters are read carefully.

    Should your issue be Constituency related, please contact Janet at my
    constituency office at janet.johnston@gnb.ca or by calling 444-4530 or
    440-9542.

    Thanks again for taking the time to reach out to me with your concerns or input.

    Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick Assemblée législative du Nouveau-Brunswick
    Office of Kris Austin, MLA                   Bureau de Kris Austin, député
    506-462-5875                                   506-462-5875





    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:12:35 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Marc.Belliveau Methinks just because you
    and CBC delete your Spin about Gaëtan Thomas the NB Power boss and his
    Nuclear buddies it does not follow that it is forgotten N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
    message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
    and questions from constituents.


    All emails are reviewed on a regular basis, however due to the high
    volume of emails my office receives, I may not be able to respond
    personally to each one.


    For media requests, please call Amanda Wildeman at: 506-429-2285 or
    email her at: Amanda.wildeman@gnb.ca<mailto:Amanda.wildeman@gnb.ca>


    Thank you once again for contacting me.

    Megan Mitton

    Member of the Legislative Assembly/Députée

    Memramcook - Tantramar

    megan.mitton@gnb.ca<mailto:megan.mitton@gnb.ca>

    506-378-1565


    Merci de m'avoir contacté. Ce courriel a pour but de vous assurer que
    votre message a bien été reçu. Je vous invite à me faire part de vos
    commentaires et de vos questions.


    Tous les courriels sont révisés régulièrement, mais en raison du
    volume élevé de courriels que mon bureau reçoit, il se peut que je ne
    sois pas en mesure de répondre personnellement à chacun.


    Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez communiquer avec Amanda
    Wildeman au : 506-429-2285 ou par courriel à : Amanda.wildeman@gnb.ca


    Merci encore une fois de m'avoir contacté.

    Megan Mitton

    Member of the Legislative Assembly/Députée

    Memramcook - Tantramar

    megan.mitton@gnb.ca<mailto:megan.mitton@gnb.ca>

    506-378-1565



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
    Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 05:12:35 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Marc.Belliveau Methinks just because you
    and CBC delete your Spin about Gaëtan Thomas the NB Power boss and his
    Nuclear buddies it does not follow that it is forgotten N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Merci encore pour votre courriel.


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 01:12:31 -0400
    Subject: YO Marc.Belliveau Methinks just because you and CBC delete
    your Spin about Gaëtan Thomas the NB Power boss and his Nuclear
    buddies it does not follow that it is forgotten N'esy Pas?
    To: Marc.Belliveau@gnb.ca, gthomas@nbpower.com, jfurey@nbpower.com,
    robert.mckee@gnb.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
    steve.murphy@ctv.ca, vicky@joiscientific.com, wharrison@nbpower.com,
    Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Karissa.Donkin@cbc.ca,
    NBInvestigates@cbc.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, mike.holland@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
    Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
    rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca,
    premier@gnb.ca, premier@ontario.ca

    NB Power CEO Gaëtan Thomas appointed chairman of the Atlanta Centre
    Governing Board of the World Association of Nuclear Operators
    2018-05-14

    Fredericton, N.B. –  The World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO)
    announced the appointment of Gaëtan Thomas as the new Chairman of the
    WANO-Atlanta Centre Regional Governing Board.

     "I am pleased to announce the appointment of Gaëtan Thomas and
    welcome him to the Atlanta Centre Regional Governing Board and the
    wider WANO family. Gaëtan brings a wealth of experience and insight to
    the position, which will be very valuable to the global community of
    nuclear operators.”  said Jacques Regaldo, chairman of WANO.

    WANO, which has over 130 members across the globe, is the organization
    that unites every company and country in the world that operates
    commercial nuclear power plants. Its goal is to achieve the highest
    possible standards of nuclear safety and excellence in operational
    performance. WANO is headquartered in London and, in addition to the
    Atlanta Centre, which has 38 members, WANO also has regional centres
    in Moscow, Paris and Tokyo.

    “I am honoured to serve as Chairman of the Atlanta Centre and to work
    with all of our nuclear professionals around the world to continue to
    improve nuclear safety in our region and to represent our centre with
    the international organization,” said Mr. Thomas. “NB Power’s Point
    Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station has long been a WANO member and has
    benefited greatly from this professional association.”

    Mr. Thomas has served as Chief Executive Officer of NB Power since
    February 2010. He is an Electrical Engineering graduate from the
    University of New Brunswick. A lifelong employee of the utility, Mr.
    Thomas has worked in all aspects of the business including as vice
    president of both the Nuclear and Distribution and Customer Service
    divisions.

    In 2015 & 2016, Mr. Thomas was named by Atlantic Business Magazine as
    one of the region’s Top 50 CEOs, and was selected as one of the Most
    Influential Acadians by l’Acadie Nouvelle, New Brunswick’s French
    provincial daily newspaper.

    Media contact: Marc Belliveau, communications, NB Power, 506-458-4203.

    https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Uq5FSBESyqgJ:https://www.nbpower.com/en/about-us/news-media-centre/news/2018/nb-power-ceo-ga%25C3%25ABtan-thomas-appointed-chairman-of-the-atlanta-centre-governing-board-of-the-world-association-of-nuclear-operators/+&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca&client=firefox-b-d



    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/joi-scientific-sheriff-follow-1.5393015



    Florida sheriff's office closes extortion investigation involving Joi Scientific

    Karissa Donkin · CBC News · Posted: Dec 16, 2019 6:00 AM AT



    Roy Kirk
    The province is paying $20K per mo to determine if a free-energy
    device (a.k.a. a perpetual motion machine) works? An odd way to waste
    of tax/ratepayer dollars. But I guess we chalk it up to
    'out-of-the-box', 'blue-sky', 'innovative' thinking? The people who
    signed off on this in the funding agencies should be unceremoniously
    turfed.


    David Raymond Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Roy Kirk: Methinks that many would agree that there should
    be a criminal investigation beginning with Norm Betts and who he knows
    N'esy Pas?









    David Raymond Amos
    Content disabled
    Methinks Gaëtan Thomas is looking forward to his retirement Maybe he
    will follow David Hay's lead and quit early before the EUB allows NB
    Power to up our Power rates or I sue the Queen again N'esy Pas?

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-ceo-retires-unexpectedly-1.904013

    NB Power CEO retires unexpectedly
    "He thought the time was right,' minister says
    CBC News · Posted: Jan 26, 2010 4:23 PM AT

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-salaries-executives-1.5098464

    NB Power management pay not excessive, utility claims
    President Gaëtan Thomas earned almost $575K in 2017, latest available
    figures show
    Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Apr 16, 2019 5:30 AM AT

    "Executive pay at NB Power may become an issue at its annual rate
    hearing next month but the utility has already gone on record
    disputing claims salaries among its managers are bloated, as former
    premier Brian Gallant openly suggested in last fall's provincial
    election."

    53 Comments

    David Amos
    Methinks the overpaid NB Power president Gaëtan Thomas and his Board
    of Directors should explain to the Minister Mikey Holland and the
    folks he represents why the NB Power lawyers and the EUB barred me
    from intervening as the rate increase hearings N'esy Pas?







    David Raymond Amos
     Content disabled
    Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Methinks the leader of the Green Party,
    Premier Blaine Higgs and Minister Holland cannot deny that I talked to
    and emailed Vicky Harris of Joi Scientific on March 1st as soon as I
    read Shane McShane's comment about SEC informing us that Mr Thomas sat
    on its board of Directors N'esy Pas?

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-florida-start-up-1.5037917

    Stop NB Power deal with mysterious Florida startup, Green leader says
    Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Mar 01, 2019 6:00 AM AT

    63 Comments

    Shawn McShane
    @David Amos And Joi Scientific Director Gaetan Thomas aka CEO of NB
    Power says what?

    David Raymond Amos
    @Shawn McShane Methinks you should ask his lawyers Madame Harrison and
    Mr Furey they are the ones I emailed because they work for you N'esy
    Pas?

     

    https://www.mccarthy.ca/en/people/gaetan-thomas 

     

    Gaetan Thomas | McCarthy Tétrault

    A recognized leader in Canada’s energy sector, Gaëtan is known for his expertise in power generation and distribution, and large construction projects.

    Gaëtan is a Strategic Advisor with McCarthy Tétrault, where he advises firm clients on the strategic issues surrounding their important infrastructure projects, including utility planning and leadership, major construction engineering, electrical energy generation, transmission and distribution, and government relations. Gaëtan is President & CEO of Conseil Économique of New Brunswick, representing more than 500 francophone businesses.

    Prior to joining the Conseil, Gaëtan enjoyed a successful 38-year career with NB Power, culminating in his 10-year role as President & CEO, during which time he led the utility through significant construction projects and positive growth. His NB Power legacy includes his accomplishments as VP Nuclear, whereby he led a successful $2.4 billion project to build a world-class nuclear generation facility – one of only three in Canada. Other roles at NB Power covered operations, engineering, project design & commissioning, and executive management – within the Generation, Nuclear, Transmission & Distribution and Customer Service Business Units.

    In addition to extensive project management experience on nuclear projects and the vision that brought small modular reactors to New Brunswick, Gaëtan is known for expertise in implementing SmartGrid systems and large transformational change leadership.

    Gaëtan is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of New Brunswick. He was elected into the Junior Achievement of New Brunswick’s Business Hall of Fame in 2019, has been recognized five times as a Top 50 CEO by Atlantic Business Magazine, and is a member of the Top 50 CEO Hall of Fame.

    Gaëtan is a member of the Federal Net-Zero Advisory Body reporting to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change. He also is Past Chairman of the World Association of Nuclear Operators (Atlanta Center), and Vice-Chairman of the Atlantic Cancer Research Institute Board of Directors. He is fully bilingual in written and spoken French and English.

    Education

    Honorary Doctorate, Science – University of New Brunswick, 2018

    ICD.D Designation – Institute of Corporate Directors, 2013

    Bachelor of Engineering, Electrical – University of New Brunswick, 1982

     

    Yo Chucky Leblanc your buddy Mikey Holland that his minion Marc.Belliveau was correct I did cross paths with him and Patrick Ervin and Michael Costello of the EUB a long time ago


    David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 1:55 AM
    To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, Marc.Belliveau@gnb.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, jfurey@nbpower.com, wharrison@nbpower.com, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, matthew.wegener@unb.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca, marc.martin@snb.ca, john.green@gnb.ca, jp.lewis@unb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, heather.black@gnb.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "jake.stewart"<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Oliver"<Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca>, "Karen.Ludwig"<Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "Jane.Philpott"<Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Larry.Tremblay"<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    Bcc: myson333 <myson333@yahoo.com>, "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, rrichard <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>
    Wednesday, 24 April 2019

    New Brunswick Minister of Forestry Mike Holland hunted down by Blogger
    about HUGE 2019 Flood!!

    https://youtu.be/q0jhyzpY0xs

    Posted by Charles Leblanc at 10:47 am No comments :


    NBPOWER Communication dude Marc Belliveau chat with Blogger about huge
    2019 Flood!

    https://youtu.be/lyWGLRCLf9I

    Posted by Charles Leblanc at 10:43 am No comments :



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
    Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:05:34 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Matthew Wegener I just called your office
    about KPMG and NB Power's books
    To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

    Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
    of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.

    This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
    Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
    may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
    message will be carefully reviewed.

    To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
    the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.


    Thank you

    -------------------

    Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
    Vancouver Granville.

    Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
    courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
    correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
    votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.

    Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
    veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
    votre adresse et votre code postal.


    Merci



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca
    Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:05:34 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Matthew Wegener I just called your office
    about KPMG and NB Power's books
    To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

    Hello,

    Thank you for your email to the Honourable Jane Philpott, Member of
    Parliament for Markham-Stouffville.

    This automated message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of
    your email. Due to the high volume of correspondence, there may be a
    delay in processing your email. Rest assured it will be given every
    consideration.

    If you have not already done so, please send us your full name,
    address and postal code which will enable us to assist you more
    quickly.

    Thank you,

    Office of the Hon. Jane Philpott
    Member of Parliament, Markham-Stouffville



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Green, John (PETL/EPFT)"<John.Green@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:05:34 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Matthew Wegener I just called your office
    about KPMG and NB Power's books
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    
    Je suis présentement à l'extérieur du bureau, de retour le 17 avril
    2019. J'aurai accès limité  à mes courriels et appels pendant ce
    temps, donc veuillez me laisser un courriel ou message vocale et je
    ferai le suivi à mon retour.

    Pour de l'aide veuillez composer le (506) 453-2261.

    Merci.
    I am currently away from the office, returning April 17, 2019. I will
    have limited access to my emails and phone calls during this time, so
    please leave an email or voice mail and I will respond upon my return.

    For immediate assistance, please call (506) 453-2261


    Thank you.

    John Green



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:05:24 -0400
    Subject: YO Matthew Wegener I just called your office about KPMG and
    NB Power's books
    To: matthew.wegener@unb.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca,
    Marc.Belliveau@gnb.ca, marc.martin@snb.ca, john.green@gnb.ca,
    jp.lewis@unb.ca, Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,
    rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, heather.black@gnb.ca,
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca
    Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com,
    Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca, Diane.Lebouthillier.a1@parl.gc.ca,
    "Bill.Morneau"Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
    clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, kathleen.roussel@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
    Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
    Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-point-lepreau-insurance-settlement-cost-1.5089232

    Top-secret Point Lepreau insurance settlement details leaking
    Social Sharing

    NB Power deal over nuclear plant refurbishment may be worth $159M,
    according to inadvertently released figures
    Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Apr 09, 2019 6:30 AM AT


    6 Comments


    David R. Amos
    Surprise Surprise Surprise



    David R. Amos
    Methinks it interesting that Matthew Wegener, a professor of
    accounting at the University of New Brunswick came up with the same
    figure I did last year but in a much different fashion N'esy Pas?


    Fred Brewer
    Point Lepreau is the albatross around NB Power's neck. Mactaquac will
    be the next.


    David R. Amos
    Reply to @Fred Brewer: Methinks many would agree that the real
    albatrosses are the NB Power's Management, its Board of Directors and
    of course the politicians who use the cash cow for their benefit N'esy
    Pas?




    Ferdinand Boudreau
    Why always secret stuff-- Its our money?
    Getting tired wool pulled over our eyes


    David R. Amos
    Reply to @Ferdinand Boudreau: Methinks you should no doubt understand
    why NB Power and the EUB keep barring me from intervening any more
    However anyone can check the public record to study what I have
    already done N'esy Pas?

    https://www.unb.ca/faculty-staff/directory/business/wegener-matthew.html


    Matthew Wegener
    Assistant Professor PhD
    Business, Faculty of
    Oland Hall 225
    Saint John
    matthew.wegener@unb.ca
    1 506 648 5534



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:32:18 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mikey Holland I just called your offices
    for the LAST time then I obviously contacted your lawyers
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

    If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
    support, please contact our Customer Service department at
    1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

    If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
    publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

    Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

    This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
    press releases.





    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:29:35 -0400
    Subject: YO Mikey Holland I just called your offices for the LAST time
    then I obviously contacted your lawyers
    To: mike.holland@gnb.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
    jfurey@nbpower.com, wharrison@nbpower.com, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
    David.Coon@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
    brian.gallant@gnb.caNewsroom@globeandmail.com,
    news@kingscorecord.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca
    Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca,
    oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
    mcu@justice.gc.ca


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2019 10:16:51 -0400
    Subject: YO Mikey Holland So Says the EUB So Say You All? RE Matter
    430 - NB Power 2019-2020 General Rate Application
    To: blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca,
    David.Coon@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca,
    robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
    oldmaison@yahoo.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
    andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
    robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
    Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
    Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca,
    Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
    Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com,
    news@dailygleaner.com, news919@rogers.com, news@hilltimes.com,
    maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
    Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca,
    martine.turcotte@bell.ca, Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca,
    andre@jafaust.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca,
    megan.mitton@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,
    michelle.conroy@gnb.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca,
    Diane.Lebouthillier@parl.gc.ca


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Mitchell, Kathleen"<Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca>
    Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 16:15:36 +0000
    Subject: Matter 430 - NB Power 2019-2020 General Rate Application /
    Instance Nº 430 - Énergie NB Demande générale de tarifs pour 2019-2020
    To: David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com, david.sollows@gnb.ca,
    Paul.Volpe@enbridge.com, dave.lavigne@enbridge.com,
    Gilles.volpe@enbridge.com, jeffery.callaghan@mcinnescooper.com,
    gerald@kissnb.com, cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com,
    hanrahan.dion@jdirving.com, lcozzarini@nbpower.com,
    jfurey@nbpower.com, SWaycott@nbpower.com,
    NBPRegulatory@nbpower.com, wharrison@nbpower.com,
    bcrawford@nbpower.com, John.Lawton@nbeub.ca, ecdesmond@nbeub.ca,
    Michael.Dickie@nbeub.ca, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca,
    Kathleen.Mitchell@nbeub.ca, General@nbeub.ca, heather.black@gnb.ca,
    rdk@indecon.com, rrichard@nb.aibn.com, jeff.garrett@sjenergy.com,
    pzarnett@bdrenergy.com
    dan.dionne@perth-andover.com, pierreroy@edmundston.ca,
    ray.robinson@sjenergy.com, sstoll@airdberlis.com,

    Good afternoon,

    Please find attached a Decision in connection with the above-noted matter.


    Bonjour,

    Veuillez trouver ci-joint une Décision de la Commission dans le cadre
    de l'instance susmentionnée.

    Kathleen Mitchell
    Chief Clerk | Greffière en chef

    Energy & Utilities Board | Commission de l'énergie et des services
    publics du N.-B.
    15 Market Square, Suite 1400
    Saint John, NB  E2L 4Y9
    506-643-7324 (direct)
    506-658-2504 (reception)

    Confidentiality Notice
    This private message (and any attachments) is for the exclusive use of
    the individual for whom, or entity for which, it is intended.  It may
    contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from
    disclosure by law.  Its author does not waive the protection afforded
    to it under applicable law. Disclosure to anyone other than the
    intended recipient does not constitute waiver of privilege.  Its
    possession or usage, by any person other than the one for whom it is
    intended, is not authorized by its author and is strictly prohibited.
    If you have received this communication in error, please notify us
    immediately, at our expense, by telephone at (506) 658-2504.  Also, if
    you received this email in error, delete it and any attachments from
    your computer system and records. Thank you.

     Avis de confidentialité
    Ce message privé (et toutes les pièces jointes) est à l'usage exclusif
    de la personne pour laquelle ou entité pour laquelle, il est destiné.
    Il peut contenir des informations qui sont personnelles,
    confidentielles ou exemptées de la divulgation par la loi.  Son auteur
    ne renonce pas à la protection accordée en vertu de la loi applicable.
    Sa divulgation à toute personne autre que son destinataire ne
    constitue pas une renonciation de privilège. Sa possession ou
    l'utilisation, par une personne autre que celle pour laquelle il est
    destiné, n'est pas autorisée par son auteur et est strictement
    interdite.  Si vous recevez cette communication par erreur, veuillez
    nous appeler dans les plus brefs délais, à frais virés, au (506)
    658-2504.  Aussi, si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez
    effacer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre système
    informatique et de vos dossiers.  Merci.



    https://www.nbpower.com/en/about-us/news-media-centre/news/2018/nb-power-ceo-ga%C3%ABtan-thomas-appointed-chairman-of-the-atlanta-centre-governing-board-of-the-world-association-of-nuclear-operators/


    NB Power CEO Gaëtan Thomas appointed chairman of the Atlanta Centre
    Governing Board of the World Association of Nuclear Operators
    2018-05-14

    Fredericton, N.B. –  The World Association of Nuclear Operators (WANO)
    announced the appointment of Gaëtan Thomas as the new Chairman of the
    WANO-Atlanta Centre Regional Governing Board.

     "I am pleased to announce the appointment of Gaëtan Thomas and
    welcome him to the Atlanta Centre Regional Governing Board and the
    wider WANO family. Gaëtan brings a wealth of experience and insight to
    the position, which will be very valuable to the global community of
    nuclear operators.”  said Jacques Regaldo, chairman of WANO.

    WANO, which has over 130 members across the globe, is the organization
    that unites every company and country in the world that operates
    commercial nuclear power plants. Its goal is to achieve the highest
    possible standards of nuclear safety and excellence in operational
    performance. WANO is headquartered in London and, in addition to the
    Atlanta Centre, which has 38 members, WANO also has regional centres
    in Moscow, Paris and Tokyo.

    “I am honoured to serve as Chairman of the Atlanta Centre and to work
    with all of our nuclear professionals around the world to continue to
    improve nuclear safety in our region and to represent our centre with
    the international organization,” said Mr. Thomas. “NB Power’s Point
    Lepreau Nuclear Generating Station has long been a WANO member and has
    benefited greatly from this professional association.”

    Mr. Thomas has served as Chief Executive Officer of NB Power since
    February 2010. He is an Electrical Engineering graduate from the
    University of New Brunswick. A lifelong employee of the utility, Mr.
    Thomas has worked in all aspects of the business including as vice
    president of both the Nuclear and Distribution and Customer Service
    divisions.

    In 2015 & 2016, Mr. Thomas was named by Atlantic Business Magazine as
    one of the region’s Top 50 CEOs, and was selected as one of the Most
    Influential Acadians by l’Acadie Nouvelle, New Brunswick’s French
    provincial daily newspaper.

    Media contact: Marc Belliveau, communications, NB Power, 506-458-4203.


    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/01/re-kpmg-rcmp-need-i-say-that-i-was-not.html


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:33:47 -0400
    Subject: Fwd: RE KPMG & RCMP Need I say that I was not surprised to
    find out on Halloween that the lawyers of the Corrupt Crown Corp known
    as NB Power knew that my lawsuit in Federal Court had been dismised
    before I did?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 13:31:40 -0400
    Subject: Re: RE KPMG & RCMP Need I say that I was not surprised to
    find out on Halloween that the lawyers of the Corrupt Crown Corp known
    as NB Power knew that my lawsuit in Federal Court had been dismised
    before I did?
    To: gathomas@nbpower.com, "Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>,
    "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
    <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "darrow.macintyre"
    <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
    "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, nmoore
    <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "jeremy.keefe"<jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>,
    "jennifer.warren"<jennifer.warren@cibc.com>, "Frank.McKenna"
    <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "len.hoyt"<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
    "greg.byrne"<greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
    "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca,
    Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc.gc.ca
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Furey, John"
    <jfurey@nbpower.com>, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>,
    "andrew.baumberg"<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
    , "marc.giroux"
    <marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "lise.henrie"
    <lise.henrie@cas-satj.gc.ca>, "Norman.Sabourin"
    <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
    >, ethics-ethique
    <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >, "Liliana.Longo"
    <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "Bill.Morneau"
    <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "bill.pentney"<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>,
    "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
    <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca
    >, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
    "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
    "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "ralph.goodale"
    <ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>

    http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/re-kpmg-rcmp-need-i-say-that-i-was-not.html

    Wednesday, 17 January 2018
    RE KPMG & RCMP Need I say that I was not surprised to find out on
    Halloween that the lawyers of the Corrupt Crown Corp known as NB Power
    knew that my lawsuit in Federal Court had been dismissed before I did?

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-revenue-agency-records-kpmg-1.4113406


    CRA records missing in KPMG tax dodge affair
    Watchdog groups call for investigation after correspondence appears to
    have been deleted
    Harvey Cashore, Nicole Percy, Nicole McCormick, Kimberly Ivany,
    Patrick Butler · CBC News ·  May 18, 2017




    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 04:39:08 -0300
    Subject: Need I remind the CBC, the Green Meanies, Premier Alward,
    David Coon and all their pals what I said about Harper, Banksters,
    Yankees, the RCMP, Indians,Zionists, the Neo Nazis such as Werner Bock
    and the old political whore Louie Lapierre?
    To: patrick.ervin@gnb.ca, Marc.Belliveau@gnb.ca,
    ralphm@interchange.ubc.ca, meahan.lynn@hawk.ca, apark@unb.ca,
    tal@unb.ca, mauriced@uwaterloo.ca, kiddk@unb.ca,
    rjackson@geofirma.com, "bernadine.chapman"
    <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, mjs837@nyu.edu, hmc
    <hmc@mediacoop.ca>, wendallnicholas <wendallnicholas@gmail.com>,
    ppalmater <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
    >, jrebick
    <jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca>, "Gary.Rhodes"
    <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "gary.forward"
    <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
    <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>,
    "fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo"<fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>,
    "calgary.acadia"<calgary.acadia@assembly.ab.ca
    >, deanr0032
    <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>,
    "calgary.northwest"<calgary.northwest@assembly.ab.ca>,
    jcherry@uoguelph.ca, disiegel@mailbox.syr.edu, David.Schneider@mun.ca,
    bmayer@ucalgary.ca, rene.lefebvre@ete.inrs.ca,
    john.molson@ggl.ulaval.ca, cryan@ucalgary.ca,
    lalita.bharadwaj@usask.ca, Sustainability@nas.edu,
    fmetallic@migmaqresource.org, Joey.Couturier@gmail.com,
    Richard.Saillant@umoncton.ca, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, pm
    <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"<ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , leader
    <leader@greenparty.ca>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
    "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
    , briangallant10
    <briangallant10@gmail.com>, execdirgen <execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>

    http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/09/need-i-remind-cbc-green-meanies-premier.html

    Hey

    Please don't try to deny the fact that I can easily prove David
    Alward, David Coon and the CBC know the old bastards Louis Lapierre
    and Werner Bock very well. They were both playing the wicked political
    game in New Brunswick long before I put my name on a ballot in 2004.

    http://spingolaspeaks.info/2013/06/18/tuesday-6-18-werner-bock/

    http://justice4germans.com/

    http://www.radicalpress.com/

    Alward must remember when Danny Boy Bussieres illegally barred me from
    Legislative properties and his pal Chucky Leblanc stole my documents
    he promised to give to the Attorney General then spilled  the Beans on
    his political neo con pals in the local Indi Media forum run by David
    Coon's many Green Meanie and Fake Left  minions. Ask the sneaky
    liberal lawyer Bernie Richard or his pals in the NB Police Commission,
    the Fat Fred City Finest and the RCMP  if I am a lair or not if you
    lost your local records and did not bother to read the documents that
    I provided you people long ago. The documents hereto attached are for
    the CROWN to argue in Federal Court. I will as I promised long ago sue
    you greedy local dudes later. Right now you are far to busy
    embarassing
    yourselves and I am enjoying the circus.

    However Mr Alward I must say that was particularly evil of your
    underling the drunken ex cop Carl Urquhart to try to have the RCMP and
    his pals in the Fat Fred City Finest  arrest me AGAIN on the night you
    won your mandate in September of 2010. You know very well that was two
    whole weeks after I had recieved the letter (hereto attached) from the
    Chair of BHP and NONE of you has ever dared to even discuss it in the
    three very long years since I forwarded it on to you and Premier Brad
    Wall etc during the election in NB. Trust that Premier Dexter got it
    it as well while he sat in opposition in Nova Scotia and bitched about
    Harper and his mindless cohorts.

    For the record trust that I thought it was incredibly that you crazy
    bastard's arrested the Neo Nazi Werner Bock in open court today and
    filed him in the Looney Bin for a long weekend. I find it rather funny
    indeed. Hell Bock laughed at me when you bastards tried hard to lock
    me up in 2008 and your blogging butt buddies Chucky Leblanc and his
    pals Richy Baby Harris and Danny Boy Fitzgerald felt free to violate
    my privacy and blog about it because they do not know the law and
    thought my goose was cooked anyway. When I asked Werner Bock why he
    thought it was funny he claimed it was just "Gallows Humour". When
    iresponded that the ghost of a Hanged Manwould see no humour in his
    jokes, he quit laughing. However he still uses that excuse to this
    very day. So turn about is fair play and its my turn to laugh at his
    plight. For what it is worth Werner Bock does not abuse his cattle and
    the CROWN knows it and it also knows that I have secured all his
    documents in a digital form and can easily prove the malice practiced
    against him by the RCMP and many others since the early seventies. He
    was very dumb not to call me as a witness whether I would have be
    hostile towards his standing as a Neo Nazi or not I would have told
    the truth and provided supporting documentation of what I witnessed
    personally. The reason Bock did not call me is because he knew that I
    would not support his theory about laser beams and etc because I had
    not witnessed it. I witnessed his care of the cattle their very
    strange deaths, the unwillingness of various governmental authorities
    to investigate and the constant police harrassment of him in a effort
    to shut
    him up. The farmer had every right to ask people to investigate. The
    animals were his lively hood and more importantly to the rest of us
    his cattle were going into the FOOD CHAIN. When the CFIA tried hard to
    have the RCMP to arrest both of un in 2009 and put their malice in
    writng it was beyond ridiculous. Werner Bock was very foolish indeed
    to stab me in the back and try to make friends with the bastards.

    The RCMP did managed to divide us in 2009 but neither of us are
    conquered thus far.
    You can see that I included many of Werner Bock's friends on the
    Internet in this email as well. We shall all see if they have the
    balls to speak in his defence. N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc and David
    Coon?

    BTW Methinks the CROWN Corp known as the CBC just violated Werner Bock's
    privacy BIGTIME as well. They always told me that they are not allowed
    to talk about suicides because of Mental Health and privacy issues.
    The same should hold true for all people even German immigants.
    Furthermore the CBC can never deny that never said a
    word about Byron Priors various litigations oe when the evil Newffy
    Judge Orr locked up him in the Waterford Hospital  for about nine
    months or so.

    I must say the CROWN was particularly dumb to lock up Bock and get the
    CBC brag about it particularly while the NB Attorney General is
    assisting two Jewish Groups to attack the McCorkell estate at the same
    time that the CROWN is prosecuting one of Bock's Neo Nazi friends Arty
    Baby Topham of Radical Press. Methinks between the
    Huffington Post, a heard of other bloggers and Internet talkshow hosts
     New Brunswick will be put  on the map even more than it  already is.

    Also even thogh everybody and his dog knows that Werner Bock and I
    parted company in 2009 the CROWN cannot deny that three of my calves
    died on Werner Bock's farm and I recorded and protested their demise
    as well. You also all know I was the one who made the videos for Bock
    in 2008/09 and wrote the words in his website about Section 444 of the
    Canadian Criminal Code. Hell I did so over a year after Mikey Murphy
    the Fomer Minister of Health/Attorney General  responded to me and
    asked the local boss of the RCMP Steve Graham to investigate and they
    never did So I made Werner Bock rather well known on the Internet in
    2008/2009 CORRECT? Google Werner Bock's name before you dare to call
    me a liar and put it in writing.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/12/werner-bock-blames-death-rays-aliens-for-cow-deaths_n_1589706.html

    http://maritimediseases.50megs.com

    That said since old Louis Lapierre claims to be unwell and can't talk
    to the CBC perhaps he in the Looney Bin with Werner Bock tonight?
    Perhaps someday when he feels better will he join the other snobby and
    very sneaky retirees in NB and sue in order to protect his unearned
    pension too N'esy Pas?

    If ya wanna know why I so pissed off on August 23 why not ask the RCMP or
    Premiers, Redford, Alward and Dexter.

    If politicians and cops play dumb or won't talk to you and you truly
    don't already know just Google two names of very different men who are
    still trying to protect their childrens' reputations and stop cyber
    bullying over the Internet while the corrupt cops laugh at us.

    David Amos and Glen Cannning

    Your favourite Zionist Mr Baconfat has had lots to evil to spew about
    us all EH Chucky Baby Leblanc?

    Well Davey Baby Alward wouldn't you be pissed off  too if the the RCMP
    laughed at you while this shit was being published about your children
    while the Zionist spindoctor was bitching on Labor Day about YOU and
    Premiers Ghiz and Dexter begging Harper for money???

    http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/

    Sunday, September 1, 2013

    Maritime Kanada's Cocksuckers

    So Premier Alward, Premiers Ghiz and  Darrell Dexter, do you guys gently
    unzip "Stevie boy's" trousers and blow him each year when you go to Ottawa
    to beg for more federal tax dollars and equalization from the rest of
    Canada?

    Red Deer Alberta,  city of less than 100,000 that has basically
    statistically full employment. Red Deer has robust manufacturing,
    conventional oil and oils sand industry servicing, agriculture and food
    processing, petro-chemical production: All turbocharged with home grown
    expertise and an unsurpassed quality if life.

    Red Deer and Central Alberta has hundreds of family or privately owned
    companies with 50 to 100 skilled workers, with gross revenues of 50 to 100
    million dollars.

    Meanwhile in Kanada's Appalachia, inbred Maritime Kanada, unemployment in
    those provinces run from 9 % to 14 % unemployment. In Alberta and
    Saskatchewan  it runs from 4.3% to 4.5 % . In each of Canada's parasitic
    Maritime jurisdictions the largest employer is the provincial government. No
    immigrants choose Maritime Kanada to settle in because the education systems
    are piss poor, and there is no private enterprise to speak of.

    In Maritime Kanada the inbred politicians campaign on the promise of a
    "chicken in every pot, and a government job for everyone that can read and
    make his X on the paper." And some that can't.

    Then there are Laura the Butt and Max still turning tricks, and Rehtaeh that
    is till dead, dead, dead. You still trying to make money off that Glen?

    Posted by Seren at 10:32 AM No comments:

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos
    902 800 0369

    Subject:
    Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
    From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
    To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

    January 30, 2007

    WITHOUT PREJUDICE

    Mr. David Amos

    Dear Mr. Amos:

    This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
    2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. Because of the nature of
    the allegations made in your message, I have taken the measure of
    forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve Graham of the RCMP
    "J" Division in Fredericton.

    Sincerely,

    Honourable Michael B. Murphy
    Minister of Health

    Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
    From: "Warren McBeath"<warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >
    To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
    nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
    motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com, John.Foran@gnb.ca,
    Oda.B@parl.gc.ca, "Bev BUSSON"<bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Paul
    Dube"<PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
    forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n

      Dear Mr. Amos,

    Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today.

    I was on days off over  the holidays and returned to
    work this evening. Rest assured I was not  ignoring
    or procrastinating to respond to your   concerns.

    As your attachment sent today refers from Premier
    Graham, our position  is clear on your dead calf issue:
    Our forensic  labs do not process  testing on animals
    in cases such as yours, they   are referred to the
    Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can
    provide these  services. If you do not choose to utilize
    their   expertise in this  instance, then that is your
    decision and nothing more can be done.

    As for your other concerns regarding the US Government,
    false  imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US,   etc...
    it is clear that  Federal authorities are aware of your concerns
    both in Canada and the  US. These issues do not fall into the
    purvue of Detachment policing in  Petitcodiac, NB.

    It was indeed an interesting and informative
    conversation we had on  December 23rd,
    and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.

    Sincerely,

     Warren McBeath, Cpl.
    GRC Caledonia RCMP
    Traffic Services NCO
    Ph: (506) 387-2222
    Fax: (506) 387-4622
    E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: <patrick.ervin@gnb.ca>; <Marc.Belliveau@gnb.ca>;
    <ralphm@interchange.ubc.ca>; "linkejul"<linkejul@gmail.com>;
    "markandcaroline"<markandcaroline@gmail.com>; "oldmaison"
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; <meahan.lynn@hawk.ca>; <apark@unb.ca>; <tal@unb.ca>;
    <mauriced@uwaterloo.ca>; <kiddk@unb.ca>; <rjackson@geofirma.com>;
    <jcherry@uoguelph.ca>; <disiegel@mailbox.syr.edu>; <David.Schneider@mun.ca>;
    <bmayer@ucalgary.ca>; <rene.lefebvre@ete.inrs.ca>;
    <john.molson@ggl.ulaval.ca>; <cryan@ucalgary.ca>;
    <lalita.bharadwaj@usask.ca>; <Sustainability@nas.edu>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ;
    <fmetallic@migmaqresource.org>
    ; "premier"<premier@gnb.ca>; "Davidc.Coon"
    <Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>; <Joey.Couturier@Gmail.com>;
    <Richard.Saillant@umoncton.ca>
    Sent: Friday, August 23, 2013 12:38 AM
    Subject: New Brunswick Energy Institute??? Yea Right Just another expensive
    whitewash overseen up by the old political whore Louie Lapierre


    Do I seem pissed off? Perhaps you should ask the Harper or bosses of
    the RCMP why that is EH David Coon?

    http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/news/news_release.2012.10.0960.html

    http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/news/news_release.2013.07.0673.html

    http://www.fisheries.ubc.ca/faculty-staff/ralph-matthews

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:47:13 -0300
    Subject: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the National
    Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanie Horst Sauerteig
    talked to that I did not?
    To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "mckeen.randy"
    <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, news@959sunfm.com, xchief
    <xchief@bell.blackberry.net>, minister <minister@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca>,
    premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "marie-claude.blais"
    <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "john.warr"<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    "bernadine.chapman"<bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    mjs837@nyu.edu, hmc <hmc@mediacoop.ca>, wendallnicholas
    <wendallnicholas@gmail.com>, ppalmater
    <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
    >, jrebick <jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Gary.Rhodes"
    <Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "gary.forward"
    <gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
    <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>,
    "fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo"<fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>,
    deanr0032 <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>,
    gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>

    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:29:46 -0300
    Subject: Re: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the
    National Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
    Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
    To: Horst Sauerteig <sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca>
    Cc: sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, "chris.huskilson"
    <chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com \"joe.oliver.c1\""
    <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
    <Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
    "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
    pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
    premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
    elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
    ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
    david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
    Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett"<rob.bennett@emera.com>,
    mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca

    FUCK YOU Sauerteig  I don't need your consent

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Horst Sauerteig <sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca>
    Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:49:45 -0400
    Subject: Re: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the
    National Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
    Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
    sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, "chris.huskilson"
    <chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com \"joe.oliver.c1\""
    <joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
    <Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
    "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
    pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
    premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
    elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
    ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
    Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
    Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett"<rob.bennett@emera.com>,
    mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca

    Please note that Mr. Amos sent this e-mail without my knowledge and/or
    consent.
    Horst Sauerteig, Wednesday, July 17, 2013

    http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/17/mining-interests-blamed/

    http://www.nashwaakwatershed.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Communique-classification-des-eaux.pdf

    Lawrence Wuest 367 2280

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:21:38 -0300
    Subject: Do you people want my help YET???
    To: CHenschel@cpaws.org, media@cpaws.org, cpawsnb@nb.sympatico.ca,
    rclowater@cpaws.org
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/15/protected-areas/

    http://cpaws.org/news/chapter/nb

    Media contact:

    Ellen Adelberg
    Director of Communications
    (613)569-7226 ext. 234
    media@cpaws.org

    http://www.nben.ca/en/collaborative-action/news-from-groups/itemlist/user/212-Contact:

    Roberta Clowater, 506-452-9902;
    cpawsnb@nb.sympatico.ca



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:45:05 -0300
    Subject: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the National
    Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
    Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
    To: sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca,
    "chris.huskilson"<chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com
    \"joe.oliver.c1\""<joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
    <Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
    "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
    pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
    premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
    elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
    ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
    Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
    Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett"<rob.bennett@emera.com>,
    mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op2bmd-XXHc

    http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningsaintjohn/2013/07/15/city-not-prepared-for-oil-disaster-possibilites/

    Horst Sauerteig
    88 Bedell Avenue
    Saint John, NB E2K 2C4
    Telephone .(506) 658-1326

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/07/15/nb-emera-brunswick-pipeline-safety-717.html

    http://brunswickpipeline.com/en/home/ourbusiness/boardofdirectors.aspx

    http://lawsoncreamer.com/lawyers/nathalie-godbout/

    http://www.zoominfo.com/#!search/profile/person?personId=1413397560&targetid=profile

    http://www.conservationcouncil.ca/about-us/eco-heroes/

    http://brunswickpipeline.com/en/home/community/saintjohncommunityliaisoncommittee/2008/agendawednesdayfebruary272008.aspx

    http://www.canaportlng.com/pdfs/ccelc_minutes_june92008.pdf

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 04:24:21 -0300
    Subject: Imagine if David Eby beats Christy Clark this time around I
    suspect he will become BC's next Attorney General then Cummins decides
    to finally to act ethically and embarasses the hell out the NDP, the
    Liberals, Harper, and you EH Mr Plant?
    To: "gplant@heenan.ca"<gplant@heenan.ca>, "dave.eby@gmail.com"
    <dave.eby@gmail.com>, "elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca"
    <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>, "jchretien@heenan.ca"
    <jchretien@heenan.ca>, "rheenan@heenan.ca"<rheenan@heenan.ca>,
    "bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com"<bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>,
    "broy@ogilvyrenault.com"<broy@ogilvyrenault.com>,
    "media@cumminsforbc.ca"<media@cumminsforbc.ca>, "weststar@telus.net"
    <weststar@telus.net>, "t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
    <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "premier@gov.bc.ca"<premier@gov.bc.ca>,
    "francoise.raunet@greenparty.bc.ca"
    <francoise.raunet@greenparty.bc.ca>, duane <duane@nickull.net>,
    "premier@gov.ab.ca"<premier@gov.ab.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ,
    "derek.burney@nortonrose.com"<derek.burney@nortonrose.com>,
    "vhuntington@dccnet.com"<vhuntington@dccnet.com>, RBauer
    <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, rtalach@beckettinjurylawyers.com,
    mbastarache@heenan.ca, ddexter <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, premier
    <premier@gnb.ca>

    Hey Mr Plant

    Please notice that I added two more pdf files to this email  that all our
    surving past and present Prime Ministers and Governor Generals are
    well aware of but you may not have seen them.

    Remember our conversation and the four emails I sent you one month before
    the writ was dropped? It was at about the same time a couple of my enemies
    in BC Splitting the Sky and Dougy Baby Christie dropped dead. They were
    followed up not long afterwards by none other than Rotten Ralphy Klein?
    Does it make me an evil person to be happy that I out lived some of my foes?
    You should not deny that Rotten Ralphy's Attorney General got the same
    letter and the same a pile of documents and a CD that all the Canadian
    Attorney General's received except the Quebecers who turned the Registered
    US Mail back 10 times but it was NEVER returned to the USA. Methinks the
    RCMP or their pals in CSIS stole my mail just like they have done before and
    since. Its rough being a whistleblower. N'esy Pas Mr. Chretien and Mr.
    Cutler?

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html

    http://www.integritybc.ca/?page_id=276

    http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2013/04/23/the-candidate-chronicles-a-friendly-election/

    Now to be fair here is one all the lawyers working for the Yankees Al Gore,
    Prez Obama and George Soros should review before Birgitta Jonsdotter and her
    Wikileaks buddies finally read it..

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/5051668/Al-Gore-and-the-boys

    Yea I know I am pipe dreaming. I doubt things will change in my lifetime but
    what is life with fine dreams? History has proven the Sheeple always get the
    governments they deserve when apathy rules the day. However once they start
    losing their shirts and have no cake to eat there is always hell to pay and
    do roll on occasion. Anyone paying attention can see that the stock
    market is at an artificial high created by the greedy Banksters NOT the
    economy. Obviously it has nowhere to go but down. Look out when it does.
    Even old folks who support Harper and Cummins get pissed when they lose
    another big chunk of their precious pensions. But to hell with us old folks
    our days
    taking advantage of this wonderful old old are winding down anyway. What is
    far worse to me is that methinks the "Powers that Be" may let loose the Dogs
    of War once again at about the same time the economy crashes. I am not the
    only soul predicting this but I have been rather outspoken about this since
    2002 when the greedy Yankees attacked my little Clan. Te public record
    of my affairs speaks for itself. If my reasoning is correct all of our
    children's future will become truly dire indeed. Shame on all you greedy
    smiling
    bastards if what I believe comes true. Trust that I will hate being correct
    but to deny the obvious would make me as foolish as you people.

    Pipedream or not the rest of this email is a nightmare for any unethical
    lawyer or cop to read or ignore.

    Unlike a lawyer or a poltiician I have always trusted my conscience, my
    logic and my strange gut feelings.just like the honest cops in the movies
    do.
    Thus far the senses I was born with have not failed me. So I must confess
    the
    I have not lost my faith in my fellow common man yet even though I hold much
    contempt towarss many low men in high places. My doubts are justifiable but
    I
    still have hope especially after watching the black guy named Charles talk
    about
    taking a break from munching on his MacDonald's and playing  his part help
    to
    save three long lost girls in the USA  It is guys like him that assure me
    that we
    common folk are not all evil people like the wealthy ones amongst us usually
    are.
    Charles should run for Congress I suspect he would win by a landslide if a
    self
    serving Independent can beat BC's Attorney General in the last election/ If
    the
    sneaky lawyer David Eby beats Christy Clark in her own riding it will only
    serve to further prove my point. Need I say I love how the political parties
    in BC are creating their own Independent opponents? Too too funny. Seems
    that they are bringing about "change" byway of their malicious incompetence.

    History as I said earlier has proven the worm always turns on the smiling
    bastards. With any luck at all it may happen soon in BC. I know I have done
    my part to try to bring about change in BC since 2004.  I still have so many
    irons in the fire in so many places to singe some fancy political arses with
    that it is quite simply unbelievable. For instance with regards to this
    email pipelines in your neck of the woods I know everyone of you checked out
    the letters hereto attached but did nothing . Curipusity is a hell of a
    thing but you are all afraid of Harper Correct? I doubt many of you greedy
    people know about Lenny Hoyt, Emera and Enbridge or Mr. Jones, his Director
    Derek Burney within TransCanada versus Mean Old Me. Trust
    that it would take me only minutes to explain it to anyone with two clues
    between their ears. In fact I have done so to quite few and still they say
    and do nothing. Hell the dumb Green Meanies in Canada have understood me
    since 2004 and still don't care about the shit that went down between Danny
    Boy Williams and I even after he sues some of them. Go figure?

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/05/07/nb-enbridge-appeal-rates-leonard.html

    http://www.transcanada.com/612.html

    http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/193845.pdf

    Methinks folks should stop listening to greedy lawyers EH? What say you Mr.
    Plant? If you recall our conversation on March 15th you demanded I wrap
    things up in a couple of minutes and I promptly did so within 30 seconds or
    so then I called your friend Elisabeth Graff and her bosses as well. After
    all your Law Firm has had Hard Copy of my material for nearly a year before
    you quit politicking as an Attorney General Then Wall Eyed Wally Opal gladly
    took your job and in turn got his arse kicked out of office by an incredibly
    stupid Independent whom I talked to as well CORRECT Ms Huntington a former
    RCMP
    Security person and Acting-Chief of Staff to the Solicitor General of
    Canada?
    What I did not bother telling you Mr. Plant was the the reason I called on
    lots
    of people the Ides of March. Scroll down and you will see I caught Harper's
    minions checking my work that day. Plus I know for a fact the CSE and the
    RCMP listen to all my calls so why not give them an earful then prove to
    many
    others I am paying attention too?

    Believe it or not not everybody is a afraid of Mr. Harper and many are
    tired of his antics. I heard through the grapevine that I have
    gotten some fans amongst the Feds and that maybe someone may use my
    documents to blow the whistle. Heres hoping that is true. The sooner I get
    my old Harley back and return to being "Just Dave" I am sure many
    politicians
    and lawyers will breath a sigh of relief. Methinks the CROWN and I should
    write an MOU ASAP and then assist me in asking the the Yankees to settle
    with as well. What say Mr. Plant? Do you know an old liberal lawyer in YOUR
    law firm capable of writing a letter to the Prime Minister and making a deal
    with fellow devil on behalf of a Canadian citizen that they purportedly
    serve? I do they got this email too and my letter hereto attached. Four of
    the
    documents are from the Canadian government one is from a very big cheese
    and only one is mine Correct?

    If no no lawyer takes my side rest assured the Green Meanies South of the
    49th heavily financed by George Soros/Swartz are about to be enlightened
    much to the chagrin of Harper and Prez Obama and of course my wife's evil
    Catholic cousins and their old Yankee buddy John Kerry the current Secretary
    of the Sad State of Affairs in the US of A.

    http://www.theinquiry.ca/wordpress/settlements/bastarache-conciliation-deals/moncton-dioceses-money-woes-will-worsen-lawyer-says/

    http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf

     Such is the way of the world and the life and times of a fierce but ethical
    political animal. As long as I maintain my Integrity I and tell the truth
    all day long
    to anyone I choose to then sit back and watch the "Powers That Be" squirm.
    Sooner or later somebody will grow some balls and simply say my name in a
    Parliament or a Congress or in the corporate media. The love of money
    dictates it.
    Of that I have no doubt.

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos
    902 800 0369



    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: <kristyf@bcconservative2013.ca
    >; <media@cumminsforbc.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:24 PM
    Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and political spats


    Media contact:
    Andrea Smith
    604.897.8478
    media@cumminsforbc.ca

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/09/16/bc-cummins-attack-ads.html

    http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1107310278688-34/Campaign+Briefing+Notes-+Volume+1+Issue+2.pdf

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Dix.MLA, Adrian"<Adrian.Dix.MLA@leg.bc.ca>
    Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:03:21 +0000
    Subject: Thank you for your email
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email.  This response is to assure you that your
    message has been received.

    All of my e-mail messages are reviewed on a regular basis. However,
    due to the high volume of e-mails received, I may not be able to
    respond personally to each one.  To help me serve you better, please
    ensure that your e-mail includes your full name, phone number and
    street address with your postal code.

    To ensure your email is sent to the most appropriate office, a
    database of all MLAs, searchable by postal code, is available at the
    BC Legislature website:  http://www.leg.bc.ca/mla/3-1-1.htm

    Thank you again for taking the time to share your ideas, concerns, and
    insight with me. If you require an immediate response or your email is
    urgent, please call our office directly at 604-660-0314

    Adrian Dix

    MLA, Vancouver-Kingsway

    Leader, New Democrat Official Opposition

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:20:05 -0300
    Subject: I just called about Fracking, Money, Municipal elections and
    Public Corruption
    To: acimediagroup@nb.aibn.com
    Cc: mhayes <mhayes@stu.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, markandcaroline
    <markandcaroline@gmail.com>

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/04/26/nb-shale-gas-doaktown-debate-632.html

    Thursday April 26, 2012
    Doaktown elections
    Posted by Kevin Shaw

    Stan Donovan was certain candidates for office in Doaktown would be
    eager to share their views on all issues at a public forum, then he
    ran into fracking.

    STANLEY M DONOVAN
    (506) 365-7860

    Doaktown,  NB

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/04/26/nb-bathurst-mayoral-race.html

    James Risdon.
    1050 Smith Street.
    Bathurst, New Brunswick.
    E2A 3V2.
    (506) 545-7192
    acimediagroup@nb.aibn.com

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:49:33 -0300
    Subject: Re Phone calls and emails to and from the CRTC, CTV and CBC since
    2002
    To: ed@veq.ca, fcfa@fcfa.franco.ca, peter.foster@crtc.gc.ca, andre
    <andre@jafaust.com>
    Cc: millstoneeditor@bell.net, jeanpierre.caissie@aaapnb.ca,
    "peter.dauphinee"<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>,
    "ndesrosiers@ccla.org"<ndesrosiers@ccla.org>

    http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/backgrnd/language/olmc_members.htm

    http://www.millstonenews.com/2011/06/edith-cody-rice.html

    Edith Cody-Rice - Publisher

         Edith Cody-Rice is the publisher of the Millstone. She recently
    retired from the position of Senior Legal Counsel to the Canadian
    Broadcasting Corporation where she worked for twenty-nine years. Edith
    has worked extensively with journalists  to help them publish their
    stories. She is currently a director of the Michener Foundation which
    grants awards and fellowships to outstanding journalists.

       Edith is deeply interested in literature and for 19 years held
    literary luncheons at the National Arts Centre in Ottawa for many of
    Canada's outstanding writers. She was also on the board of directors
    of the Writers' Trust of Canada for 15 years and was its chair in the
    mid 1990's. She founded a very popular fundraising dinner for the
    Trust in Ottawa called Politics and the Pen which raises over $200,000
    per year for the Writers' Trust. She was a founding director of the
    George Woodcock Fund which provides support to published writers who
    face financial need while completing a book project.
       Edith has also been a director of the Writers' Foundation of
    Canada, the Ottawa Valley Book Festival, the Ottawa International
    Writers' Festival, and is currently a board member of Puppets Up!
    International Puppet Festival.   Edith has been a fund raiser for the
    Ottawa library.

       Edith serves on the Millstone as publisher, reporter at large, book
    reviewer, legal counsel and web designer.

    From: Edith Cody-Rice <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>
    Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:53:07 -0500
    Subject: Calls and E-mails to CBC
    To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    Cc: Rob Renaud <Rob.Renaud@cbc.ca>

    Dear Mr. Amos:

    CBC personnel have contacted me concerning your calls and e-mails to
    them. As you are threatening legal action, would you kindly direct any
    further calls or correspondence to me. Other CBC personnel will not
    respond further to your correspondence or calls.


    Edith Cody-Rice
    Senior Legal Counsel
    Premier Conseiller juridique
    CBC/Radio-Canada
    181 Queen Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1K9
    Postal Address: P.O. Box 3220, Station C, Ottawa K1Y 1E4
    Tel: (613) 288-6164
    Cell: (613) 720-5185
    Fax/ Télécopieur (613) 288-6279

    IMPORTANT NOTICE
    This communication is subject to solicitor/client privilege and
    contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to
    whom it is addressed.  Any unauthorized disclosure, copying, other
    distribution of this communication
    or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you
    have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and
    delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to
    anyone.

    AVIS IMPORTANT
    La présente communication est assujettie au privilège du secret
    professionnel de l'avocat et renferme des renseignements confidentiels
    intéressant uniquement leur destinataire. Il est interdit de
    divulguer, de copier ou de distribuer cette communication par quelque
    moyen que ce soit ou de donner suite à son contenu sans y être
    autorisé. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, veuillez nous en
    avertir immédiatement et le supprimer en évitant de le lire, de le
    copier ou de le transmettre à qui que ce soit.

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/cbc-world-to-tackle-bush-on-false-flag.html

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Ombudsman de Radio-Canada <Ombudsma@radio-canada.ca>
    Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:24:41 -0400
    Subject: Faire suivre : Fwd: I tried to call you all The pdf files
    hereto attached prove that  I am no liar and the mp3 and te wav files
    in the next two emails speak  volumes
    To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

    Dear David Amos:

    I acknowledge receipt of you three e-mails attached.
    The Radio-Canada Ombudsman has a mandate to determine whether
    information programs of Radio-Canada has broadcast fully respect
    CBC/Radio-Canada*s journalism policy.  Radio-Canada's Office of the
    Ombudsman is completely independent of Radio-Canada program management
    and thus does not intervene in the editorial process prior to the
    broadcast of information programs.  You can read the mandate of the
    Ombudsmans  web sites: http://www.radio-canada.ca/apropos/ombudsman/
    and http://www.cbc.ca/ombudsman/

    Best regards,

    Julie Miville-Dechêne
    Ombudsman, Services français
    Société Radio-Canada
    www.radio-canada.ca/Ombudsman

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: David Amos
    To: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
    Cc: diane.valade@bell.ca
    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 12:01 AM
    Subject: Re: I am curious

    Ms. Turcotte

    Great. Thanks for the response. It saves time and unnecessary expense
    and redundancy because as I said, your local ATV Station is getting a
    hard copy and Mr. Pozen will receive his upon my return to the USA. I
    will attach hardcopy of this email to those documents so they will
    understand that I am serious about my complaints. But I will remain
    true to my word and not forward this email to anyone outside of your
    company. Trust that I am seeking friends not more foes. I truly
    believe that CTV should capitalize on this story but I am somewhat
    dubious after I saw how Bell Canada employed its media to slam the
    people striking against Aliant last night. Please never forget I have
    been compelled to play the wicked political game and I do understand
    the argument at the bottom of this email. I am very much against the
    huge mergers at the Global Level. I am certain every lawyer and
    politician knows why.
    Best Regards
    David R. Amos

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
    To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
    Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 10:28 AM
    Subject: RE: I am curious

    Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is
    no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the
    documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the
    process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it in
    my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We will
    then provide you with a reply.

    Martine Turcotte
    Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
    BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
    1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
    Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7
    Tel:(514) 870-4637
    Fax: (514) 870-4877
    email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca

    Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction:
    Diane Valade
    Tel: 514) 870-4638
    email: diane.valade@bell.ca

    -----Original Message-----
    From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 6:12 AM
    To: Turcotte, Martine (EX05453)
    Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca; W-Five@ctv.ca
    Subject: I am curious

    Madam

    I did not receive a response from you to the last email so I am not
    certain if you received it. I must inform you that I will be closing
    my briefcase in Yahoo for public view at the end of the week. I have a
    great deal of material to add and I only wish certain parties to view
    it. I opened it for you the other day as an act of good faith. Mr.
    Pozen can check my work in the dockets of the various courts around
    Boston they are a matter of Public Record my files are not. As you can
    see by this and some following emails. I am very busy dealing with
    criminal matters first before filing civil complaints in the USA. As I
    told you when you called a lot has been happening. I have made a lot
    of cops mad at me and I don't trust them a bit particularly after the
    Police Commission is willing to check their work so i have been busy
    watching my back and covering my butt. However that does not mean that
    I have not thought about our conversation and was curious about a few
    things.

    I was glad to receive your call and impressed by the fact that you
    were more than willing to receive the material and a copy of the
    wiretap tape in particular. Your stated willingness to uphold the law
    was a rare statement to me. However I was curious why you only
    mentioned my voicemail to Mr. Pozen and not the email to your company
    and the news program that it owns. Did they not inform you as well? If
    they didn't I am not surprised because I have some other rather
    interesting denials from the Media. the most interesting would have to
    be from the PBS program called Frontline when I introduced its
    producer Michael Sullivan to the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan. Now
    that is a story well worth W5 telling. Too bad they showed me their
    ass. As a courtesy to you and a further act of good faith, I will not
    forward this email to anyone else until after I return to the USA and
    nothing has been resolved between BCE and I and I am compelled to name
    it in my complaint. I would find it very hard to believe that Mr,
    Pozen does not know everything he needs to know about me right now.

    I had also called a lawyer, Steven Skurka who had a week long little
    special on CTV . I had tried to inform him that I knew my rights his
    assistant hollered at me. You from speaking to me yourself that I am
    not a rude character. I found it too funny to be treated that way and
    I had resolved to serve him this stuff byway of the local ATV Station
    that had presented his smiling talking head to me. That is why I was
    telling you that you could get this stuff from the local ATV station.
    I found it quite strange that you did not rely on them to send it on
    to you. Thus I must make an extra copy to comply with your request.

    I know the date stamp on the forwarded email is incorrect but that is
    because my old laptop goes to the first year in it when I boot up and
    sometimes I am too busy or tired to bother changing it. However MSN
    tracks it with the true date. Brad Smith and I have a bone to pick as
    well and I have been checking his work rather closely since he ignored
    my letter to him last year. His boss Bill Gates is gonna be very angry
    and Brad Smith and Steve Balmer in the near future if I have anything
    to do with it. If you do act ethically and immediately I will settle
    with your company very cheaply in comparsion to the bottom lines of my
    first two complaints. In fact I will be so impressed I will
    immediatlely offer you a better job than the one you have now. Please
    study the material I will provide you closely and ask me any thing you
    wish.

    I will do as I promised and send the material you requested as soon as
    I can put it all together. Right now I am on the move and far away
    from my printer. Is the following your correct address? Perhaps you
    should consider sending someone to the my meeting with the Police
    Commission in Fredericton next week in order to hear me speak of these
    matters to law enforcement before I return to the USA. Once I do
    return there I will serve the Mr. Pozen the material as promised and
    call him to testify in my pending trial. The following emails should
    explain some of my concerns to you. My wife will be in Canada next
    week as well to pick up our kids. I will allow you to speak to her if
    you wish. She has had a nervous breakdown over the legal crap and I do
    have her Durable Power of Attorney pursuant to M.G.L. 201 B. Mr. Pozen
    can ask Robert S. Creedon Jr. about that document. I argued it with
    him before the entire Judicuary Commitee on Sept. 18th 2003.

    I will call you in a minute to make certain that you get this and the
    following emails.

    David R. Amos

    Martine Turcotte
    1000 de la Gauchetiere Ouest
    Floor 41
    Montreal, Quebec H3B 58H Canada
    Tel: (514) 870-4637
    Fax: (514) 870-4877

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: David Amos
    To: W-Five@ctv.ca
    Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; oldmaison@yahoo.com
    Sent: Sunday, January 06, 1980 4:07 PM
    Subject: My turn to tell a tale.

    I think is time to let a little something out of the bag for the
    benefit of a few Maritimers who think they know something about the
    Media.I did notify CBC, the Rogers crowd and Harry Steele's folks that
    I knew a little bit about the Media and that I had written a book
    about it. Problem is I need an editor and I believe I may have found
    one.He comes in the form of a disenchanted newspaper man. But the
    thing is I want to put it on the web for all to read for free so there
    is no money in it for him. So I guess I wiil sue some big company with
    a Prima Facia complaint and settle for a lesser amount out of court.
    Lets just say I am looking hard at you dudes. I had zeroed in on the
    Yankee media long ago and I am certain folks within the Ottawa Citizen
    and Democracy Watch had checked my work(Hey Duff say hey to Dan for
    me) I have crossed paths with many of Globemedia's people many times
    for many reasons and I can easily prove it. What I haven't bothered to
    tell them that I knew the reason Gobal etc never mentioned me was
    Frank McKenna and the Irving influence because basically that was a no
    brainer anyway. However If Globemedia and all their cohorts didn't
    think I knew about the influence Robert Pozen in Boston, you had best
    think again. then give Mr. Spitzer, Mr. Galvin, Mr. Shelby and Mr.
    Donaldson a call and drop my name along with Mr. Nesters and Mr.
    Koski's and tell them my stuff is off to the Arar Commission I am
    heading back to the USA to call Mr. Pozen and many folks he calls
    friends to court. Perhaps in Ottawa Bill Rowe will truly speak for the
    common man after all if the worm turns on his buddies. How do you
    people sleep at night? What say you? Why not get honest with the world
    and I will settle cheap? I will give one of your lawyers something
    real soon before I serve Mr. Pozen his just due byway of this lawyer
    Jeffrey N Carp MFS Investment Management
    500 Boylston Street Boston MA 02116-3741 617-954-5747 Perhaps he
    should call Putnam investments or the Brookline Savings bank and say
    hey to Mr Chapman and Mr Tripp for me. I just called Bob Pozen at 617
    954-5707 and introduced myself so that he can never say that he never
    heard my name.

    MFS set to agree to second settlement
    By SINCLAIR STEWART

    00:00 EST Wednesday, March 31, 2004

    By SINCLAIR STEWART

    00:00 EST Wednesday, March 31, 2004

    Sun Life Financial Inc.'s Boston-based mutual fund arm will agree to a
    $50-million (U.S.) settlement today with U.S. regulators over
    allegations the firm directed trading commissions to brokerages in
    exchange for preferential treatment, according to people familiar with
    the matter.

    Sources said Massachusetts Financial Services Co. will announce a deal
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission this morning that will
    also include "compliance reforms," in addition to a token $1
    disgorgement penalty.

    Eric Morse, a spokesman for MFS, declined to comment. A spokesman for
    the SEC refused to discuss any talks with the firm.

    The embattled fund company is hoping this settlement will enable it to
    move beyond the intense public and regulatory scrutiny it has endured
    in the past several months.

    In early February, MFS agreed to a $350-million settlement with the
    SEC and New York State Attorney-General Eliot Spitzer for allegedly
    permitting improper trades in some of its bigger funds. That figure
    included $225-million in penalties and restitution to investors, along
    with $125-million in fee reductions spread out over the next five
    years.

    The fallout within MFS, which manages about $140-billion in assets,
    was also considerable. Its two highest-ranking officials -- chief
    executive officer John Ballen and president Kevin Parke -- were each
    fined and slapped with temporary suspensions by the SEC, leading to
    their departures from the firm. Long-serving chairman Jeffrey Shames
    also retired in the aftermath of MFS's problems, and was replaced by
    Robert Pozen, formerly a senior executive at Fidelity Investments and
    onetime associate general counsel at the SEC.

    Mr. Pozen has been charged with cleaning up the mess, and tightening
    the firm's internal controls.

    He has already hired new legal and compliance officers, added
    monitoring staff, and imposed a ban on so-called "soft dollar"
    transactions. The firm also prohibited the practice of directing
    trading fees to brokerages in exchange for being placed on a preferred
    list of customers and receiving better visibility for its funds.

    This latter arrangement, known in industry circles as "pay for play,"
    is at the centre of MFS's pending settlement with the SEC. Sources
    said the current settlement talks advanced fairly quickly because of
    the voluntary compliance improvements MFS has undertaken.

    In a recent interview with The Globe and Mail, Mr. Pozen attacked the
    basis of the regulator's case as "very weak" and said it should have
    raised this as a problem when it conducted audits of the company.

    Nevertheless, he said he hoped to settle the matter quickly, in large
    part to avoid a costly legal battle and prevent nervous investors from
    pulling their money out of MFS funds. So far, the damage has been
    contained to one major client, the Illinois Teachers Retirement
    System, which fired MFS last month as lead manager on a $664-million
    portfolio.

    The SEC is investigating about a dozen other fund companies for
    directed brokerage, although sources say MFS will settle individually,
    rather than as part of a group.

    Last fall, brokerage powerhouse Morgan Stanley agreed to pay
    $50-million to settle charges it failed to tell investors it was
    promoting funds with which the firm had a special arrangement. Morgan
    Stanley had a "Partners Program" of 14 funds, including MFS, that paid
    "substantial" fees in return for the brokerage steering their funds to
    investors, the SEC claimed.

    The regulator indicated a few months ago it would begin investigating
    a number of fund companies for directing commissions, but did not say
    which firms it would target.

    Sun Life revealed in a filing that MFS was under investigation for
    this practice just a couple of weeks after its first settlement with
    the SEC and Mr. Spitzer. The news came as a surprise to most
    observers, some of whom criticized the insurer's CEO, Donald Stewart,
    for not disclosing this probe earlier.

    MFS is hoping to recoup some of the $175-million it must repay
    investors under the terms of the first settlement by suing firms and
    individuals that engaged in market timing and late trading of its
    funds. Market timing involves making frequent trades in and out of
    funds in order to cash in on minor pricing discrepancies. It is not
    illegal, but is usually prohibited by many fund companies, since the
    quick trading can raise administrative costs and undermine returns to
    investors.

    ----- Original Message -----

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: W-FIVE Viewer Mail
    To: 'R. S. Webb'
    Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 3:03 PM
    Subject: RE: possble story

    Dear Mr. Amos,

    I would like to thank you for your email to W-FIVE, sorry for the
    delay in responding.

    We review every email and story idea that we receive here at W-FIVE
    and give it serious consideration. Your email has been forwarded to
    our executive and senior producer for review. If we are interested in
    pursuing your idea further, you will be contacted by one of our
    researchers.

    Thanks again for your input. Your interest in our program is much
    appreciated.

    Sincerely,

    Lisa-Marie

    Production Coordinator

    W-FIVE

    -----Original Message-----
    From: R. S. Webb [mailto:cei@nbnet.nb.ca]
    Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:28 PM
    To: W-FIVE@ctv.ca
    Subject: possble story

    I am a Canadian Citizen who thus far, as a plaintiff, has two Lawsuits
    in the US District Court of Massachucetts they are numbered 02-11686-
    RGS and 02-11687-RGS. They were removed to that Court from the Norfolk
    Superior Court by the US Attorney Michael J. Sullivan very improperly.
    However they shall remain there because of my status as a Canandian
    Citizen. Judge Sterns has not even held a Conference about the matters
    because he likely does not want to hear the matter because I have
    presented all Members of the Bar with their worst fear of a catch 22
    problem. Accordinging to law he is late. I have complained of 47
    defendants 34 of whom are State Defendants( the Attorney General, The
    Commission of Judicial Conduct Board of Bar Overseers etc) and 3 are
    Federal Treasury Agents. Some of the defendants are over two months
    late in their answer to the Summons. The smallest suit amounts to 188
    million dollars in the form of relief. There is a lot to these matters
    and too much to briefly explain. But in a nutshell my wife's Aunt, who
    is buried beside Rose Kennedy, left my wife some money. It was stolen
    by her relatives in executing the estate. No news there. But the
    crooks are very well connected politically and every part of the old
    crony network in Boston covered for them. The crook and our cousin,
    Charles J. Kickham Jr of the Kickham Law Office on Beacon St, has been
    past President of Bar Associations. He has sat on the Board of
    Governors of Harvard Law School etc. I have given much information to
    many members of the press who have simply ignored some interesting
    facts. What should be somewhat newsworthy is how far a wild colonial
    boy has come in prosecuting Pro Se the most profund Yankee
    carpetbaggers. My next two lawsuits Under title 18 are wickedly
    righteous. I have left one copy of much information in Saint John New
    Brunswick at a lawyer's Office, Mosher and Chedore 33 Charlotte St if
    some one wishes to view them. I can be reached at this Cell number 506
    434- 1379

    David R. Amos



    LAW

    Canadian Media Deregulation Provides Insight Into FCC Proposal



    Critics of consolidation say the integrity of the news is being
    undermined by the effects of concentrated ownership





    Editor's Note: This story has been updated to correct inaccuracies.
    Please see the corrected version here.

    The original version of this story (see below) posted on May 29, 2003
    incorrectly stated that Canada's two national newspapers, The Globe
    and Mail and the National Post, recently laid off their online
    editorial staffs. According to globeandmail.com editor Angus Frame,
    there have been no recent editorial layoffs at globeandmail.com; the
    site's 18-person staff continues to write and edit stories that are
    published exclusively online. The National Post did not have dedicated
    online editorial staff, and did not have online editorial layoffs. The
    story also failed to acknowledge that the country's largest newspaper,
    the Toronto Star, also has a significant online operation.

    The Federal Communications Commission is poised to unveil new media
    ownership rules June 2 that some experts believe may change the face
    of American journalism.

    The new rules would allow media companies to own television stations
    and newspapers in the same cities.

    The FCC barred companies from owning newspapers and TV stations in the
    same market in 1975, but big media owners like the Tribune Co., Knight
    Ridder, MediaNews Group and the New York Times say it's time to lift
    that ban.

    They argue that cross-ownership makes for better journalism: Staffers
    working for companies that own newspapers and TV stations in the same
    market can work together to create richer, multimedia news reports
    that can then run in the company's paper and on their stations and Web
    sites.

    Advocates say the synergies of convergence lead to cost savings,
    increased advertising revenues and greater efficiencies.

    Cross-ownership already exists in some markets: The FCC granted about
    40 exemptions to the cross-ownership rule in cases where a company
    already had television or radio stations and a newspaper in a single
    city. The FCC also granted exemptions in larger markets after media
    mergers produced cross-ownership situations.

    ‘The concentration of ownership in a lot of major Canadian cities is
    of interest for a lot reasons, but mainly because it provides too much
    news coming through one pipeline.’
    --Russ Mills, former publisher of the Ottawa Citizen

    The Tribune Co., for example, owns television stations and newspapers
    in Los Angeles, Chicago, New York and Miami.

    How further media consolidation and convergence would play out if the
    FCC does lift the ban on cross-ownership has been the subject of hot
    debate in the weeks leading up to the commission's June 2 vote.

    Experts familiar with the rapid consolidation of media in Canada say
    the U.S. should look northward for some lessons on what loosening
    cross-ownership restrictions could mean to journalism in the U.S.

    In Canada, the deregulation of cross-media ownership occurred
    gradually over the last 20 years. Within the past eight years, it has
    led to massive consolidation of media companies.

    Most of Canada's news media -- including newspapers and broadcast
    stations in all of its major cities -- are in the hands of two media
    giants: CanWest Global Communications Inc., and Bell Globemedia -- a
    division of the country's largest telephone company, Bell Canada.

    The rapid media consolidation in Canada has inspired an
    often-acrimonious debate over whether Canadian journalists are able to
    report objectively on social and political issues and whether the
    country's corporate media has allowed business interests to undermine
    the role of journalism in a modern democracy.

    "Based on the experience in Canada, dropping restrictions on
    cross-ownership certainly hasn't worked out well," said Russ Mills,
    former publisher of the Ottawa Citizen in Canada's capital city, who
    was fired by CanWest in a fight over editorial independence.

    "The concentration of ownership in a lot of major Canadian cities is
    of interest for a lot of reasons, but mainly because it provides too
    much news coming through one pipeline," he said. "When companies use
    ownership to control the news, and they do have the ability to do so,
    it hurts everyone."

    Though the two media conglomerates said cross-media consolidation
    would improve online journalism, many media observers say online
    journalism at local papers has gone downhill in the wake of
    consolidation.

    The country's two national newspapers, the National Post, half-owned
    by CanWest, and The Globe and Mail, owned by Bell Canada's media wing,
    Globemedia, have laid off the online reporters and editors at the two
    papers that once produced copy separate from print editions.

    The two papers, former online staffers said, were the only ones in
    Canada that were doing something other than simply repurposing content
    from newspaper pages into newspaper Web sites.

    Executives at Bell Globemedia and CanWest have defended the cutbacks,
    saying they were a result of cost-cutting efforts and consolidations
    undertaken after spending billions of dollars to acquire newspaper and
    broadcasting properties.

    Consolidation accelerated in 1990s

    Canada's restrictions on cross-media ownership were carved largely
    from regulatory decisions on broadcasting licenses made since the
    1950s by the Canadian Radio-Television Commission -- Canada's version
    of the FCC.

    By the mid-1980s, Canadian media experts say, exceptions to
    cross-media ownership rules had eroded the cross-ownership ban to the
    point that it was unenforcable and largely ignored.

    By the mid-1990s, consolidation of Canadian media companies had
    accelerated on the strength of dot.com economics. And in 2000,
    CanWest, the second largest broadcaster in the country, announced a
    $3.5-billion deal to purchase a majority of the nation's newspapers --
    including papers in the nation's 12 largest cities.

    Within weeks, Jean Monty, Bell Canada's CEO at the time, announced
    that Canada's largest phone company had set its sights on owning both
    content and the multimedia pipelines into consumers' homes.

    The decision prompted Bell Globemedia to purchase the Globe and Mail
    and the nation's largest TV network, CTV, in 2001.

    Despite the rising consolidation of media outlets, the massive
    purchases of newspapers by CanWest Global and Bell Globemedia took
    many Canadian journalists and media-watchers by surprise.

    CanWest and Bell executives convinced Canada's CRTC that convergence
    was necessary to attract advertising revenue and reduce costs if
    newspapers in many Canadian communities were to survive. And they
    promised that resources from new revenues would be devoted to
    improving the quality and reach of journalism through the Internet.

    When questions about convergence arose during CRTC hearings on both
    companies' broadcast licenses shortly after their newspaper purchases,
    they promised regulators that they would separate management of
    news-gathering operations by their television stations and newspapers.

    Officials from the Canada National Newspaper Guild complained that
    keeping management separate would not prevent companies from forcing
    journalists to perform work for both newspapers and television, to the
    detriment of journalistic independence.

    Critics -- including journalism professors, journalists, newspaper and
    broadcast union officials, and some government officials -- have
    argued that the quality of journalism has gone down, not up, as a
    result of convergence.

    Joyce Smith, an assistant professor at Canada's Ryerson University,
    teaches online journalism and worked on the online staff at the Globe
    and Mail before those employees were laid off last year.

    She said the one opportunity to see convergence succeed might have
    been missed by Bell Globemedia in its efforts to cut costs to recoup
    some of what it spent on media acquisitions.

    "What I found interesting was that the actual idea of convergence
    wasn't a hit with people working with just the newspaper or just
    television," Smith said. "Where it really happened was with the online
    news team. There were things the TV folks could clearly do much better
    with the online newspaper. By pooling resources, it all did work much
    better.

    "But in the tradition of journalism," she said, "reporters were
    asking, 'What does this mean for me? Does it mean that I have to file
    stories to the Web and then do stand-ups in newsroom, while doing my
    piece for the deadline at the end of the day?'

    "Basically, (owners) wanted reporters to be one-man bands," Smith
    said. "That has been played and replayed here. It made sense from a
    business model, but journalists, especially those who have been around
    for a while, went into newspapers and TV for a reason. Some are great
    at doing both, but not everyone has the same aptitude. And no one has
    the time in the day to do it all. Some of the expectations were
    outrageous."

    Canada reexamining changes

    While U.S. media critics and media executives have been testifying
    over the past few weeks in Senate hearings on the proposed changes in
    the FCC's media ownership rules, Canada is busy reexamining what has
    come of its own cross-media consolidations.

    Two inquiries are underway by Canadian government officials to explore
    the impact of cross-media ownership and consolidation on journalistic
    integrity and media responsibility.

    The Canadian Senate's Committee on Transport and Communication began
    taking testimony at the end of April on those issues and is expected
    to report its findings within the next year.

    A House of Commons committee on Canadian heritage is expected to
    release an 800-page report next month on its own yearlong
    investigation into the impact of media concentration and political
    efforts by corporations to ease restrictions on foreign ownership of
    Canadian media.

    But media-watchers, who have a ringside seat on Canada's great media
    debate, say they are doubtful that government investigations will
    produce any new regulation on media conglomerates.

    "The horse is out of the barn," said Arnold Amber, director of the
    National Newspaper Guild of Canada. "But the good news is that this
    has at least inspired a vigorous national debate on press freedom and
    responsibility."

    Amber and other critics of media convergence said promises of more
    stories and better information from combining print and broadcast news
    staffs have largely failed in Canada.

    "Bell Globemedia is talking about restructuring and selling off its
    media wing," Amber said. "The failure of convergence to bring in
    revenues was primarily responsible for the resignation of Bell
    Canada's CEO, Jean Monty," who stepped down in April 2002.

    Geoffrey Elliot, vice-president of corporate affairs for CanWest, said
    that convergence has not led to revenues, or the reduced costs, the
    company had hoped for.

    But Elliot, and other supporters of cross-media ownership, argues that
    all sides have benefited from consolidation.

    "We are a family-owned business that saw an opportunity in which the
    whole was greater than the sum of the parts," Elliot said. "We saw
    substantial potential synergies on the sales side by putting
    television and newspaper assets together, since they both serve
    primarily advertising clients as sources of revenue, and serve a
    combination of local and national markets."

    Amber said the companies likely saw their primary financial advantages
    from a convergence of back-office technologies -- combining
    circulation, sales, printing and management operations.

    But it was something else that brought issues to a head in Canada over
    media consolidation and sharing newsroom resources: The loss of
    diversity of voices within the Canadian media took on new importance,
    observers say, after a series of events that led to accusations of
    censorship and political bias by CanWest's owners.

    In December 2001, CanWest -- which owns 11 major dailies and 22
    smaller papers in Canada -- issued a directive to its newspaper
    editors that they would be expected to run three editorials per week
    that reflected the position of CanWest’s owners on political or social
    issues.

    The decision was met with a spate of criticism -- especially when
    editors were told that other local editorials were not to contradict
    those from corporate headquarters.

    A byline strike ensued at the Montreal Gazette, and inquiries by the
    newspaper guild there led to findings that work by columnists and
    cartoonists was spiked when it conflicted with opinions from corporate
    headquarters.

    Several journalists quit; some staffers published a protest Web site.

    The furor finally boiled over into the public arena last June when
    Russ Mills, the publisher of the Ottawa Citizen, was fired by CanWest
    for running a series of stories and an editorial that outlined alleged
    political and financial irregularities in the administration of
    Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien.

    Elliot, the CanWest vice president, said the controversy arose because
    Mills failed to let CanWest's owners know in advance of the series or
    the editorial -- which called on Chretien, a friend of CanWest
    patriarch Israel Asper, to resign.

    Mills said he had not sought permission for either the investigative
    series, or the editorial, because he believed in preserving "editorial
    independence."

    The problem, Mills said, was that the new owners were trying to
    dictate local editorial policy from corporate headquarters.

    Elliot described the concern over attempts at a national editorial
    policy -- which has since been largely abandoned –- as a tempest
    without substance.

    He said CanWest’s owners were "well within their rights to propose
    national editorials," and that their actions were no different that
    those of other newspaper ownership groups prior to media
    consolidation.

    "There has never been any effort to control what was published in news
    stories," he said.

    Since his firing, Mills has become an outspoken critic of media
    consolidation in Canada, and he testified in April before the Canadian
    Senate committee conducting media hearings. He was also awarded a
    Neiman Fellowship at Harvard University and is the incoming dean of
    the journalism program at Algonquin College in Ottawa.

    Meanwhile, Mills' firing prompted a public opinion poll by Canada's
    largest media union that found that the incident had caused the public
    to lose confidence in the media's editorial independence.

    The results, union officials said, showed that Canadians were
    concerned about press freedom and wanted the government to look into
    problems associated with media concentration.

    Peter Murdock, then vice-president of the communications union, told
    Canada Newswire that the poll "demonstrates that Canadians want their
    journalists protected from the whims and prejudice of media barons. It
    is a grim warning to media corporations and government that Canadians
    believe that the very integrity of the news that feeds our democracy
    is being undermined by the effects of concentrated media ownership."

    It is clear that online journalism at Canada’s newspapers has changed
    dramatically under CanWest’s corporate control.

    The company replaced independent newspaper Web sites with a common
    site, Canada.com, which allows consumers to access local news by
    clicking on the community they are interested in.

    Elliot said community news on the Web site comes from local newspapers
    and television stations, and said that consolidating that information
    on a single Web site provides consumers better access to local news
    across the country -- as well as reduces costs.

    Bruce MacCormack, former head of interactive media at CanWest, said
    supplementing newspaper and television content with a common Web site
    has made access to news more efficient and allowed the corporation to
    serve consumers better.

    "The consumers of online media … were also television viewers and
    newspaper readers, and at different points in the day, different media
    were the best way to reach those people," MacCormack said.

    "Someone watching television in the evening could be told about
    stories being developed for the next day's newspaper, which is read on
    the commuter train as people go to work," he said. "Then, during
    working hours, the Internet was the most effective way to get them up
    to date on news, and tease them for television use at night."

    "These were handoff mechanisms that worked to reach people, so
    consumers and the public were able to access services in the most
    appropriate media, for whatever method they could best be served."

    CanWest recently filed testimony with the FCC to support the
    relaxation of cross-media regulations in the U.S. That testimony
    challenges media critics on their central objections to cross-media
    ownership.

    "Today's media market is the richest and most diverse in the history
    of modern media," the document says. "Cross-ownership has strengthened
    media companies and encouraged greater diversity and more sources of
    information.

    "Experience," it adds, "simply does not support the contention of some
    opponents of cross-media ownership, that consumers would have access
    to fewer point of view, or would see only repackaged versions of the
    same content across multimedia platforms."

    Smith, the Ryerson professor -- despite her criticisms of the handling
    of online media opportunities in Canada -- said she sees differences
    between media ownership consolidation in Canada and in the United
    States.

    "In the U.S., because of the size of the market, the chance of one or
    two owners gobbling up everything, I think, would be less than in
    Canada," she said. "But there is some caution in that.

    "If you are thinking about journalists, there are wonderful things
    about operating in a converged environment. It was really exciting
    thinking we could potentially have video, and it may be good for news
    consumers in the sense that (online video) will be a faster way of
    converging types of media.

    "But you get a lot of the same stuff. There is no alternative. You are
    going to lose some (editorial) voices in the process."

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: "kennedyc"<kennedyc@nbnet.nb.ca>; "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>;
    "premier"<premier@gnb.ca>; "Angela.MazerolleStephens"
    <Angela.MazerolleStephens@gnb.ca>; "info"<info@pierlotpensionlaw.com>;
    "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>;
    "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>; "acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>;
    "Paul.Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>;
    <pierre-marcel.desjardins@umoncton.ca>; "srowland"<srowland@goodmans.ca>;
    "bob.rae"<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
    >; <Margot@nbu.ca>; "execdirgen"
    <execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>; <rveys@soa.org>; "Wayne.Lang"
    <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "dean.buzza"<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
    "toewsv1"<toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "marie-claude.blais"
    <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; "adrian.dix.mla"<adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>;
    "premier"<premier@gov.bc.ca>; "MulcaT"<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "andre"
    <andre@jafaust.com>; "oldmaison"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "paul.dewar.a1"
    <paul.dewar.a1@parl.gc.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; <gd.wells@bellaliant.net>;
    <pension@gnb.ca>; "cpowers"<cpowers@soa.org>; <ombudsman@cibc.com>;
    "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>
    Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 1:45 AM
    Subject: Yo Mr Sinclair why was I not surprised to see Kennedy dismiss me
    after Victor Boudreau stepped up and added his two bits?


    In my humble opinion you dudes nee to learn new tricks. Most of the
    unions already went along with the sucker play so the retirees
    pensions were never under threat anyway. The smart ones with enough
    time in retired last year as soon as they smell what was in the wind.

     Blaine Higgs just did his road trip to stir up a lot of shit so folks
    would ignore his budget. Kinda like what Boudreau did with the ferries
    in 2009. N'esyPas?

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/04/24/nb-pension-reforms-liberals-legal.html

    The Opposition Liberals are questioning whether proposed pension
    reforms for retired civil servants are legal.

    Retired civil servants could lose their annual cost-of-living
    increases when markets perform poorly under the proposed changes.

    Liberal MLA Victor Boudreau pointed to recent unrelated lawsuit where
    a Court of Queen’s Bench judge ruled an employer could not
    unilaterally change the rules for cost-of-living increases in pension
    benefits.

    Still, Boudreau stopped short of calling the reforms illegal.

    "We don't have the resources to do that type of legal reference,” he said.

    “But obviously the province does and could very easily refer this to
    the courts to get a reference from them.”

    Finance Minister Blaine Higgs had acknowledged during one of a series
    of public meetings with retirees last week that he wasn't sure he
    could legally change the pension rules.

    After checking with government lawyers, however, he said Tuesday he is sure.

    "I received an answer that said yes, we could,” said Higgs.

    Will review case law
    But Attorney General Marie-Claude Blais seemed unprepared for Liberal
    questioning about the 2011 case, which involved hospital workers
    across the province.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: "Cliff Kennedy"<kennedyc@bdsminc.ca>; "david.alward"
    <david.alward@gnb.ca>; "srowland"<srowland@goodmans.ca>;
    "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>; "John.Sinclair"
    <John.Sinclair@nbimc.com>; "marie-claude.blais"
    <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; "Wayne.Lang"<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
    "police"<police@fredericton.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; "terry.seguin"
    <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>
    Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 7:31 PM
    Subject: Re: We just talked about pensions correct Mr Kennedy?


    You are the arsehole who had no time for me and treated me like fool
    when I called and tried to tell you how I could help you but  then you
    were as sweet as pie the next day to Terry Seguin who will never do a
    fucking thing except make fun of you CORRECT?

    On 4/23/13, Cliff Kennedy <kennedyc@bdsminc.ca> wrote:
    > David!  You certainly have the wrong Clifford Kennedy. I am not a lawyer
    > and
    > never have been. I am a retired Civil Servant from the Province of New
    > Brunswick with 26 years of service. Cliff.
    >
    > Sent from my iPhone
    >
    > CLIFFORD KENNEDY JR.
    > 73 Kenneth Street
    > Beaver Dam (NB) E3B 8B3
    > Home: 506-459-3665
    > Mobile: 506-470-2070
    > Email: kennedyc@bdsminc.ca
    >
    >


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: "kennedyc"<kennedyc@nbnet.nb.ca>; "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>;
    "premier"<premier@gnb.ca>; "Angela.MazerolleStephens"
    <Angela.MazerolleStephens@gnb.ca>; "info"<info@pierlotpensionlaw.com>;
    "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>;
    "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>; "acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>;
    "Paul.Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>;
    <pierre-marcel.desjardins@umoncton.ca>; "srowland"<srowland@goodmans.ca>;
    "bob.rae"<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
    >; <Margot@nbu.ca>; "execdirgen"
    <execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>; <rveys@soa.org>; "Wayne.Lang"
    <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "dean.buzza"<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
    "toewsv1"<toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>; "marie-claude.blais"
    <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; "adrian.dix.mla"<adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>;
    "premier"<premier@gov.bc.ca>; "MulcaT"<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>; "andre"
    <andre@jafaust.com>; "oldmaison"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "paul.dewar.a1"
    <paul.dewar.a1@parl.gc.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; <gd.wells@bellaliant.net>;
    <pension@gnb.ca>; <cpowers@soa.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 1:01 AM
    Subject: Yo Margo say hey to the very nasty Mr Cardy and his new lawyer/NDP
    buddy Lamrock for me will ya?


    BTW Both the CROWN Corps known as the CBC and the RCMP know that I
    have been publishing quite a few of my emails (including this one) in
    this blog lately

    http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/04/re-pensions-i-have-to-caution-you-this.html

    From: Richard Veys <rveys@soa.org>
    Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 22:47:26 -0500
    Subject: Out of Office: We just talked about pensions correct Mr Kennedy?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I will be out of the office until May 1 and will have only occasional
    access to email during that time.  Please excuse any delay in
    responding.  If you need assistance before May 1, please contact my
    assistant, Cathy Powers, at cpowers@soa.org or 847-706-3568.


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Pension@gnb.ca"<Pension@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 00:47:04 -0300
    Subject: Automatic Reply - Réponse Automatique
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email.

    If you are registering for the PSSA Retiree Town Hall information
    session, you are now registered.

    If you are offering your comments, thank-you for taking the time to
    provide your input but please note that we will not be responding to
    the comments.

    Nous vous remercions pour votre courriel.

    Si vous vous inscrivez pour la session d'information pour les
    retraités de la LPRSP, vous êtes maintenant inscrit.

    Si vous offrez vos commentaires, nous vous remercions pour votre temps
    et vos idées. Priez noter par contre, que nous ne pourrons pas
    répondre aux commentaires.




    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: "kennedyc"<kennedyc@nbnet.nb.ca>; "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>;
    "premier"<premier@gnb.ca>; "Angela.MazerolleStephens"
    <Angela.MazerolleStephens@gnb.ca>; "info"<info@pierlotpensionlaw.com>;
    "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>;
    "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>; "acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>;
    "Paul.Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>;
    <pierre-marcel.desjardins@umoncton.ca>; "srowland"<srowland@goodmans.ca>;
    "bob.rae"<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
    >; <Margot@nbu.ca>; "execdirgen"
    <execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>; <rveys@soa.org>; <pmccrossan@eckler.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; <gd.wells@bellaliant.net>;
    <pension@gnb.ca>
    Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 12:46 AM
    Subject: Re: We just talked about pensions correct Mr Kennedy?


    Susan Rowland and your old Law Firm certainly remember mean old me EH Bob
    Rae?

    http://www.pensioncoalitionnb.ca/home/commentary/31-contract-morre-than-a-piece-of-paper

    http://pensioncoalitionnb.ca/8-latest-news/9-time-to-act

    http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/04/22/pensioners/

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/story/2013/02/21/f-shared-risk-pension-plan.html

    http://www.nbu.ca/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=599%3Adutch-model-woes-shouldnt-alarm-pensionners-actuary-&catid=115%3Atalk-about-pensions&Itemid=328&lang=en

    From: "Mazerolle Stephens, Angela(JUS)"Angela.MazerolleStephens@gnb.ca
    Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:39:20 -0300
    Subject: RE: "I have to caution you, this is not a game." Karlheinz
    Schreiber
    To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

    Mr. Amos:

    Receipt is acknowledged of the five pieces of e-mail you sent to me on
    May 14, 2009.

    Upon review, it is apparent that they do not relate to me either
    personally or professionally. Please note that your correspondence is
    unwanted and unwelcome.

    Please do not send me any more of your communications, as I find them
    harassing in nature.

    Sincerely,

    Angela Mazerolle Stephens
    Superintendent of Pensions
    Office of the Superintendent of Pensions Department of Justice and
    Consumer Affairs
    Province of New Brunswick
    Frederick Square, Ste. 450
    77 Westmorland Street
    P.O. Box 6000
    Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1
    Ph: (506) 453-2055
    Fax: (506) 457-7266

    E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE
    This e-mail and the information contained in it is confidential, may be
    privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the
    addressee(s). Any other person is strictly prohibited from using,
    disclosing, distributing or reproducing it. If you have received this
    communication in error, please reply by e-mail to the sender and delete
    or destroy all copies of this message.

    CLAUSE DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ POUR LES ENVOIS PAR COURRIEL
    Le présent courriel et les renseignements qu'il contient sont
    confidentiels, peuvent être protégés par le secret professionnel et
    sont à l'usage exclusif du (des) destinataire(s) susmentionné(s). Toute
    autre personne est par les présentes avisée qu'il lui est strictement
    interdit d'en faire l'utilisation, la diffusion, la distribution ou la
    reproduction. Si cette transmission vous est arrivée par erreur,
    veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par
    courriel, puis effacer ou détruire toutes les copies du présent
    message.

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: <td.ombudsman@td.com>; <citicanadaombudsman@citigroup.com>;
    <ombudsman@scotiabank.com>; <ombudsman@rbc.com>; <ombudsman@cibc.com>;
    <ombudsman@obsi.ca>; <alan.sinclair@ubs.com>;
    <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
    <leader@greenparty.ca>; <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>;
    "evelyngreene"<evelyngreene@live.ca>; <wearefredup@gmail.com>;
    "acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 9:51 PM
    Subject: All the people crying about their pensions need to have
    Franky McKenna explain what I said about Victor Boudreau's budget in
    2009 EH Mr Sinclair?


    From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:26:06 -0300
    Subject: Attn Ms Sheila Fraser clearly the lawyer Angela Mazerolle
    Stephens and her boss TJ Burke are willing to argue me in Federal
    Court Do you too?
    To: tom@nbu.ca, Debbie@nbu.ca, marilynquinn@nbnu.ca, dbrown@nbnu.ca,
    alberta.stanton@gnb.ca, Atip-aiprp@oag-bvg.gc.ca,
    communications@oag-bvg.gc.ca, pension@unb.ca, dlegere@cupe.ca,
    norma.robinson07@yahoo.com, pat.bonner@saintjohn.ca,
    odet.robichaud@gnb.ca, dsmith@judicom.gc.ca
    Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    ,
    "oldmaison@yahoo.com"oldmaison@yahoo.com, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca"
    t.j.burke@gnb.ca

    Just so ya know I don't think Judge David Smith was talking through his
    hat with his little spit and chew with the crook T J Burke and his soon
    to Dr of Law boss Mr Graham. My question is why didn't he call me a
    week or so ago?

    http://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/cmslib/general/news_pub_other_Alternative_en.pdf

    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009/05/05/nb-burke-judge-complaint-259.html

    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009/05/07/nb-burke-jackson-judge-525.html

    http://www.unb.ca/news/view.cgi?id=1734

    http://nbbusinessjournal.canadaeast.com/journal/article/664174

    http://www.nbpea.nb.ca/pagehandler.asp?pid=188&lid=eng

    http://www.nbnu-siinb.nb.ca/contact.htm

    http://nb.cupe.ca/contacts/executive-committee/

    http://www.unb.ca/pension/content/contact.html

    From: "Mazerolle Stephens, Angela(JUS)"Angela.MazerolleStephens@gnb.ca
    Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:39:20 -0300
    Subject: RE: "I have to caution you, this is not a game." Karlheinz
    Schreiber
    To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

    Mr. Amos:

    Receipt is acknowledged of the five pieces of e-mail you sent to me on
    May 14, 2009.

    Upon review, it is apparent that they do not relate to me either
    personally or professionally. Please note that your correspondence is
    unwanted and unwelcome.

    Please do not send me any more of your communications, as I find them
    harassing in nature.

    Sincerely,

    Angela Mazerolle Stephens
    Superintendent of Pensions
    Office of the Superintendent of Pensions Department of Justice and
    Consumer Affairs
    Province of New Brunswick
    Frederick Square, Ste. 450
    77 Westmorland Street
    P.O. Box 6000
    Fredericton, NB E3B 5H1
    Ph: (506) 453-2055
    Fax: (506) 457-7266

    E-MAIL CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE
    This e-mail and the information contained in it is confidential, may be
    privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the
    addressee(s). Any other person is strictly prohibited from using,
    disclosing, distributing or reproducing it. If you have received this
    communication in error, please reply by e-mail to the sender and delete
    or destroy all copies of this message.

    CLAUSE DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ POUR LES ENVOIS PAR COURRIEL
    Le présent courriel et les renseignements qu'il contient sont
    confidentiels, peuvent être protégés par le secret professionnel et
    sont à l'usage exclusif du (des) destinataire(s) susmentionné(s). Toute
    autre personne est par les présentes avisée qu'il lui est strictement
    interdit d'en faire l'utilisation, la diffusion, la distribution ou la
    reproduction. Si cette transmission vous est arrivée par erreur,
    veuillez en aviser immédiatement l'expéditeur par
    courriel, puis effacer ou détruire toutes les copies du présent
    message.

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:07:30 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: I did call the lawyer Kevin Young in PA first and was
    dismissed by his assistant
    To: angela.mazerollestephens@gnb.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:55:26 -0300
    Subject: I did call the lawyer Kevin Young in PA first and was
    dismissed by his assistant
    To: kevin.young@towersperrin.com, Keri.Alletson@towersperrin.com

    http://www.towersperrin.com/tp/showhtml.jsp?url=global/about/leadership.htm&country=global

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:33:51 -0300
    Subject: FYI I called (202 551-6061) for H. David Kotz, the Inspector
    General of the SEC and several of his associates again today after
    receiving the usaula response.
    To: newyork-fund@citco.com, halifax-fund@citco.com,
    toronto-fund@citco.com, info@nsbi.ca, oig <oig@sec.gov>,
    chairmanoffice@sec.gov, jenny.strasburg@wsj.com
    Cc: "t.j.burke@gnb.ca"<t.j.burke@gnb.ca>, webo <webo@xplornet.com>,
    advocacycollective <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>
    ,
    "oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Richard Harris
    <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, dohertylaw <dohertylaw@rogers.com>,
    "David.ALWARD@gnb.ca"<David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>

    As per usual the Yankee Feds all played as dumb as posts but some of
    the snobby invited me to sue the USA. However my thinking is why don't
    I sue some of the nasty bastards personally as well just like I did
    seven very long years ago?

    Better yet why don't I start with you T.J. Burke and call Vaugh
    Barnett and his blogging buddies Richard Harris, Danny Boy Fitzgerald
    and Chucky Leblanc and witnesses to testify against you?

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos

    From: CHAIRMANOFFICE <CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov>
    Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:17:01 -0400
    Subject: U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your e-mail to the Chairman's Office of the U.S.
    Securities and Exchange Commission.  Your comments and concerns are very
    important to us.  Unfortunately, because of the large volume of e-mail
    received, the Chairman can not personally respond to each message.  We
    do read and carefully consider the opinions expressed in all of the
    e-mails that we receive.

        If you are an investor with a complaint about a securities
    professional, firm or a public company, please visit our Complaint
    Center,
    at http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml, to file a complaint.  If you have
    a securities-related question, please visit our website at
    http://www.sec.gov/answers.shtml to find fast answers to your questions
    and solutions to common investment problems.  If you are a securities
    professional needing assistance on technical matters, please check our
    "information for" pages on the top right of our website, www.sec.gov.

        We deeply appreciate your taking the time to communicate your
    thoughts and concerns to the Securities and Exchange Commission.



        Sincerely,


        Kristin J. Kaepplein
        Director
        Office of Investor Education and Advocacy
        U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 03:39:10 -0300
    Subject: Perhaps you should remind SPECIAL AGENT KRISTA L. CORR of the
    documents and CD I gave the FBI and Dianne Wilkerson and of her answer
    to me EH?
    To: mdstern@sswg.com, barryp.wilson@yahoo.com,
    michael.sullivan@usdoj.gov, jacoby@globe.com, ambrogi@legaline.com,
    info@chuckturner.us, lsweet@bostonherald.com, walker@globe.com
    Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>

    http://multimedia.boston.com/m/21517066/newsnight-chuck-turner-s-attorney.htm

    http://www.med.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Rich/2008/JHR_10212008_2-08cr54_USA_v_Szypt.pdf

    BARRY P. WILSON
    240 COMMERCIAL STREET
    SUITE 5A
    BOSTON, MA 02109 (
    617) 248-8979
    Email: barryp.wilson@yahoo.com

    http://www.sswg.com/max.htm

    Max D. SternPartner
    Stern Shapiro Weissberg & Garin LLP
    90 Canal Street
    Boston, MA, 02114-2022
    617-742-5800 ext. 111
    mdstern@sswg.com,


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 5 Apr 2009 10:02:02 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNYc
    To: Lawrence_Summers@ksg.harvard.edu, doug_gavel@harvard.edu,
    donna_kalikow@hks.harvard.edu, david_ellwood@harvard.edu,
    roberta.rampton@thomsonreuters.com, andrew.stern@thomsonreuters.com,
    gensongillespie@aol.com, EGreenspan <EGreenspan@144king.com>,
    rwhillman@ucdavis.edu
    Cc: Dan Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, webo <webo@xplornet.com>, Editor
    <Editor@pittsburghquarterly.com>, Matthew Talbot
    <editor@thereview.on.ca>, editor <editor@thismagazine.ca>, EDitor
    <EDitor@ripoffreport.com>

    Hey Larry

    Remember me and the ghost of Charles J. Kickham Jr and all your p;d
    Treasury buddies?

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090404/ts_nm/us_summers_hedgefund

    http://www.law.ucdavis.edu/faculty/Hillman/

    "The road to practicing law internationally begins at home," said Robert
    Hillman

    No shit Mr hillman tell that to your buddy Chris Cox the former editor
    of the Harvard Law Review and all his other legal cohorts will ya?

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:30:39 -0300
    Subject: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNYc
    To: almenasm@northjersey.com
    Cc: contact@whosarat.com

    http://www.fortleesuburbanite.com/NC/0/248.html

    http://www.northjersey.com/opinion/moreviews/For_former_mayor_Madoff_conveys_a_deeper_evil.html

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:58:54 -0300
    Subject: Remember me lady? Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION
    FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNYc
    To: talkleft@aol.com, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, Kandalaw@mindspring.com,
    Dan Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, dtnews@telegraph.co.uk,
    TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com
    Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, Russ.Stanton@latimes.com,
    meredith.goodman@latimes.com, ninkster@navigantconsulting.com,
    dgolub@sgtlaw.com, dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com,
    bresee@courant.com

    http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/4/1/202519/5769

    It's criminal forfeiture and he pleaded guilty to the forfeiture
    counts but disputed the amounts. There's a March 6 letter about the
    forfeitures that's sealed but the media has filed a motion to unseal
    it. Madoff's lawyer filed a letter today agreeing parts should be
    unsealed.

    Whose emails from March 6th do YOU think are still sealed? To think
    you call youself a lawyer and you have had my material for five years
    EH dummy?

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 14:42:32 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNYc
    To: eisman@kimeisler.com
    Cc: "flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca"<flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca>, goodale
    <goodale@sasktel.net>

    http://www.kimeisler.com/

    http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/6896.html

    FYI I got an interesting call from Greg Craig's office in the White
    House before I received the following email perhaps you should ask me
    why that is if you don't already know the reason and are forbidden
    from reporting the awful truth of it all. EH?

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:50:17 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    To: chad.bray@dowjones.com

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)"<Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
    Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400
    Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , USANYS-MADOFF
    <USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov>, "Litt, Marc (USANYS)"<Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
    Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov,
    krishnamurthyp@sec.gov

    Thank you for your response.

    Wendy Olsen
    Victim Witness Coordinator

    On 4/20/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    > http://www.pensioncoalitionnb.ca/our-team
    >
    > Our Team
    > Created on Friday, 08 February 2013 11:49
    > The intent is to help give focus to the growing pension coalition for
    > retirees in the province.
    >
    > Here is the Steering Committee "TEAM" ...
    >
    > The Official Media Contact person is Clifford Kennedy:
    >
    > kennedyc@nbnet.nb.caThis email address is being protected from
    > spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.       459-3665 (H)
    >    470-2070 (cell)
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 03:19:33 -0300
    > Subject: Who is more ethical INTERPOL or the RCMP or Elections Canada
    > or Sun Media or politicians if any at all EH?
    > To: Brigitte.Pellerin@sunmedia.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
    > <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
    , MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, pm
    > <pm@pm.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
    > sylvain.petitclerc@dpcp.gouv.qc.ca, brazep@sen.parl.gc.ca
    > Cc: "bob.paulson"<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "j.kroes"
    > <j.kroes@interpol.int>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2013/03/22/senator_patrick_brazeaus_legal_team_appalled_by_version_of_events_circulating_in_media.html
    >
    > http://www.orilliapacket.com/2013/02/26/woman-says-patrick-brazeau-spat-in-her-face-pushed-her-down-stairs
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 18:42:27 -0300
    > Subject: I just called and left a message for Michael Sona's lawyer
    > about Harper, Elections Canada and Sun Media
    > To: nboxall@bsbcriminallaw.com, brian.lilley@sunmedia.ca
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    > Phone: 613-604-2188
    > 877-786-4479
    >
    > Fax: 613-236-6958
    >
    > E-mail: nboxall@bsbcriminallaw.com
    >
    > Mr. Boxall is a founding partner of Bayne Sellar Boxall.
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 00:46:06 -0400
    > Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Cst Peddle ask the
    > nasty Newfy lawyer Tommy Boy Marshall why that is
    > To: "Wayne.Lang"<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, toewsv1
    > <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, georgemurphy@gov.nl.ca, tosborne@gov.nl.ca,
    > william.baer@usdoj.gov, randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca, yvonnejones@gov.nl.ca,
    > gerryrogers@gov.nl.ca
    > Cc: Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, tommarshall@gov.nl.ca,
    > "bob.paulson"<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos
    > <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
    > Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
    > To: randyedmunds <randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
    > affect the interests of every person in every district of every
    > country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
    > Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
    > some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
    >
    > All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
    > Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
    > Conservatives
    >
    >
    > Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
    > link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
    >
    > Here is why
    >
    > http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2
    >
    > Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
    > Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
    > Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
    > following file
    >
    > http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
    >
    > http://occupywallst.org/users/DavidRaymondAmos/
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:32:30 -0400
    > Subject: Andre meet Biil Csapo of Occupy Wall St He is a decent fellow
    > who can be reached at (516) 708-4777 Perhaps you two should talk ASAP
    > To: wcsapo <wcsapo@gmail.com>
    > Cc: occupyfredericton <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>
    >
    > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    > Subject: Your friends in Corridor or the Potash Corp or Bruce Northrup
    > or the RCMP should have told you about this stuff not I
    > To: "khalid"<khalid@windsorenergy.ca>, "Wayne.Lang"
    > <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
    > <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
    > "thenewbrunswicker"<thenewbrunswicker@gmail.com>, "chiefape"
    > <chiefape@gmail.com>, "danfour"<danfour@myginch.com>, "evelyngreene"
    > <evelyngreene@live.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
    > <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, "tom_alexander"
    > <tom_alexander@swn.com>
    > Cc: "thepurplevioletpress"<thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>,
    > "maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    > Date: Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 4:16 PM
    >
    >
    > http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
    >
    > http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
    >
    > http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
    >
    > FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
    > Senator Arlen Specter
    > United States Senate
    > Committee on the Judiciary
    > 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
    > Washington, DC 20510
    >
    > Dear Mr. Specter:
    >
    > I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
    > named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
    > raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
    > these are illegal
    > FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you
    > about this previously.
    >
    > Very truly yours,
    > Barry A. Bachrach
    > Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
    > Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
    > Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
    >
    > http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
    >
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
    > the USDOJ for me will ya?
    > To: "RBauer"<RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
    > cspada@lswlaw.com, "msmith"<msmith@svlaw.com>, "bginsberg"
    > <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig"
    > <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
    > <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
    > <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
    >, "MulcaT"<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
    > "leader"<leader@greenparty.ca>
    > Cc: alevine@cooley.com, "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ,
    > michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
    > Date: Saturday, November 17, 2012, 10:10 AM
    >
    >
    > QSLS Politics
    > By Location  Visit Detail
    > Visit 29,419
    > Domain Name   usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
    > IP Address   149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
    > ISP   US Dept of Justice
    > Location   Continent  :  North America
    > Country  :  United States  (Facts)
    > State  :  District of Columbia
    > City  :  Washington
    > Lat/Long  :  38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
    > Language   English (U.S.) en-us
    > Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    > Browser   Internet Explorer 8.0
    > Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
    > CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
    > DI60SP1001)
    > Javascript   version 1.3
    > Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
    > Color Depth  :  32 bits
    > Time of Visit   Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
    > Last Page View   Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
    > Visit Length   0 seconds
    > Page Views   1
    > Referring URL  http://www.google.co...
    wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
    > Search Engine  google.com
    > Search Words  david amos bernie madoff
    > Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
    olsen-on.html
    > Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
    olsen-on.html
    > Out Click
    > Time Zone   UTC-5:00
    > Visitor's Time   Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
    > Visit Number   29,419
    >
    >> http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324595904578119412229102532.html
    >>
    >> http://www.ecbalaw.com/partnerEmery.html
    >>
    >>
    >> http://www.madoff.com/document/dockets/000997-peterbmadofforder09-01503docket77.pdf
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:50:17 -0300
    >> Subject: Fwd: Re :USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    >> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    >> To: chad.bray@dowjones.com
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)"<Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
    >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400
    >> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    >> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , USANYS-MADOFF
    >> <USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov>, "Litt, Marc (USANYS)"<Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov>
    >> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov,
    >> krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
    >>
    >> Thank you for your response.
    >>
    >> Wendy Olsen
    >> Victim Witness Coordinator
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
    >> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
    >> To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
    >> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
    >> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
    >> OFFICE SDNY
    >>
    >> Ms Olsen
    >>
    >> Thank you for keeping me informed.
    >>
    >> Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
    >> make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
    >> disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
    >> of Law within a purported democracy.
    >>
    >> As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
    >> wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
    >> privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
    >> protect their butts from impreacment,  litigation and prosecution.
    >>
    >> The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
    >> aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
    >> the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
    >> pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
    >> was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
    >> trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
    >> secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
    >> poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
    >> are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
    >> beginning over seven years ago..
    >>
    >> Veritas Vincit
    >> David Raymond Amos
    >> 506 756 8687
    >>
    >> P.S. For the record  Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
    >> soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
    >> night.
    >>
    >> http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
    >> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
    articleFull
    >>
    >> Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
    >> is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
    >> timing  They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
    >> forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
    >> wiretappping  and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.
    >>
    >> "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
    >> and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."
    >>
    >> He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
    >> Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
    >> acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
    >> Putnam insiders.
    >>
    >> Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
    >> is in hot water again.
    >>
    >> Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
    >> private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
    >> investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
    >> enter the private sector," Scannell said."
    >>
    >> --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
    >> OFFICE SDNY
    >> To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, "oig"
    >> <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
    >> ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald"<danf@danf.net>
    >> Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
    >> mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
    >> david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
    >> benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
    >> Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM
    >>
    >> Need I say BULLSHIT?
    >>
    >> http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
    >> ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#
    articleFull
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
    >> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
    >> OFFICE
    >> SDNY
    >> To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
    >> ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
    >> Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
    >> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
    >> <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
    >> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    >> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    >> To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us, MartiK1 <MartiK1@parl.gc.ca>,
    >> "Paul. Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
    >> <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
    >> Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov
    >>
    >> From: "Peck,Dave"<DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
    >> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
    >> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
    >> INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.
    >>
    >> Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.
    >>
    >> He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
    >> gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us
    >>
    >> I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.
    >>
    >> Thank you,
    >>
    >> Chief Dave Peck
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
    >> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    >> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    >> To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
    >> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
    >> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    >> To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: USANYS-MADOFF
    >> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
    >> To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
    >> Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
    >>
    >> In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
    >> received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
    >> victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.  This
    >> includes your email to the Government.  If the correspondence from
    >> victims is unsealed, the victim's personal identifying information
    >> including name, address, telephone number and email address (to the
    >> extent it was included on the correspondence) will become public. The
    >> Government must submit a response to the request by NBC and ABC by
    >> Tuesday, March 31, 2009.  Please let us know whether you consent to
    >> the full disclosure of your correspondence, or whether you wish to
    >> have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy or other reasons.
    >> If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
    >> know the reason.  We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
    >> can.  Thank you.
    >>
    >> I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
    >> emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
    >> reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
    >> chickenshits.
    >>
    >> I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
    >> never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
    >> with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?
    >>
    >> Veritas Vincit
    >> David Raymond Amos
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
    >> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
    >> KPMG etc  may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
    >> To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
    >> Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
    >> KPMG etc  may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
    >> To: PChavkin@mintz.com
    >> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)"<Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
    >> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
    >> Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
    >> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
    >> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>
    >>     On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
    >> guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
    >> March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:
    >>
    >>      Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
    >> consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
    >> defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
    >> Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
    >> imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
    >> released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
    >> Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
    >> conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
    >> whether the Court intends to accept the plea.  At that time, the Court
    >> will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.
    >>
    >>     Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by the
    >> Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense counsel
    >> to speak on the issue of bail.  The Court will then announce its
    >> intended ruling on that issue.  The Court will then invite individuals
    >> who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.
    >>
    >>     The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
    >> heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
    >> restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant.  The Court
    >> also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
    >> concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
    >> proceeding.
    >>
    >>     A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
    >> be
    >> found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
    >> Southern District of New York:
    >>
    >> http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys
    >>
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
    >> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
    >> To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
    >> Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
    >> KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
    >>
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
    >> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
    >> To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
    >> USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
    >> Cc: oig
    >> Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
    >> etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
    >>
    >> horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: "Sartory, Thomas J."<TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
    >> Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
    >> Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
    >> discuss     Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
    >> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>
    >>
    >> Dear Mr. Amos,
    >>
    >>     I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs.  Your email below to
    >> Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
    >> While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
    >> Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a  position to
    >> help you.  Please do not send further communications to any of our
    >> attorneys.  We will not be able to respond, and your communications
    >> will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.
    >>
    >>     We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.
    >>
    >> Sincerely,
    >>
    >> Thomas J. Sartory
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: David Amos [mailto:
    >> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
    >> To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
    >> reed@hbsslaw.com
    >> Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
    >> discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
    >>
    >> Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH? (902 800 0369)
    >>
    >>
    >> Post a comment:
    >> https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11475858&postID=114783709674881631&ext-ref=comm-sub-email
    >>
    >> Unsubscribe to comments for this post:
    >> http://www.blogger.com/comment-unsubscribe.g?blogID=11475858&postID=114783709674881631
    >>
    >> Posted by David Raymond Amos to Just Dave at Friday, May 22, 2009
    >>
    >

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: "elisabeth.graff"<elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "weststar"
    <weststar@telus.net>; "premier"<premier@gov.bc.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; "t.wilson"
    <t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "radical"<radical@radicalpress.com>
    Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:35 PM
    Subject: Fwd: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA and
    Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians lawyers
    Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd Russell and
    Claude Aubin versus Mean old me


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:03:04 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA
    and Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians
    lawyers Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd
    Russell and Claude Aubin versus Mean old me
    To: premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
    lmcgrady@mbwlaw.ca
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "adrian.dix.mla"
    <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:08:49 -0300
    Subject: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA and
    Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians
    lawyers Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd
    Russell and Claude Aubin versus Mean old me
    To: yvonnejones@gov.nl.ca, "MulcaT@parl.gc.ca"<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
    "aubinc@cactuscom.com"<aubinc@cactuscom.com>,
    "justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
    ,
    "policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com"<policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com>,
    "media.karenforcanada@gmail.com"<media.karenforcanada@gmail.com>,
    "Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca"<Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca>,
    brycefequet@metisnationofcanada.com
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , trussell
    <trussell@nunatukavut.ca>, ppalmater <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
    >,
    Darcey@metisonline.ca, merv <merv@northwebpress.com>, radical
    <radical@radicalpress.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
    "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, jacques boucher
    <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, andre
    <andre@jafaust.com>

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2013/03/15/nl-peter-penashue-political-reaction-315.html

    http://nlliberals.ca/caucus/cartwright-lanse-au-clair-yvonne-jones-mha/

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: <gerrish@nb.aibn.com>; "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>;
    <johnelaw@nb.aibn.com>; "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>;
    <odette.snow@umoncton.ca>; <ipeach@unb.ca>; "donald.arseneault"
    <donald.arseneault@gnb.ca>; "david.wilkins"
    <david.wilkins@nelsonmullins.com>; "david.akin"<david.akin@sunmedia.ca>
    Cc: <richard.scott@mcinnescooper.com>; <renner@unb.ca>;
    <smaclean@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>; <mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>;
    <paulette.robert@hotmail.com>; "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ;
    <bartllaw@nb.aibn.com>; <Kim.Poffenroth@gnb.ca>;
    <tgallant-leblanc@coxandpalmer.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7:31 AM
    Subject: Fwd: At least Alward Rene Basque and even Jason Cooling know
    Seguin, Collins and Cardy are full of bullshit just like you EH Chucky
    Lelanc?


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 05:15:52 -0300
    Subject: At least Alward Rene Basque and even Jason Cooling know
    Seguin, Collins and Cardy are full of bullshit just like you EH Chucky
    Lelanc?
    To: "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, chris.collins@gnb.ca,
    Roger.L.Melanson@gnb.ca, "luc.labonte"<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>,
    "Wayne.Lang"<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman"
    <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, police <police@fredericton.ca>,
    Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, "mike.olscamp"
    <mike.olscamp@gnb.ca>, johnw.betts@gnb.ca,
    james.mockler@gormannason.com, nicole.beaulieu@gnb.ca,
    chantal.m.cormier@gnb.ca, "marie-claude.blais"
    <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "dan. bussieres"<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>,
    "Leanne.Fitch"<Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, sunrayzulu
    <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "dean.buzza"<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    deanr0032 <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, xtofury <xtofury@gmail.com>,
    grenouf <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>, radical
    <radical@radicalpress.com>, merv <merv@northwebpress.com>, acampbell
    <acampbell@ctv.ca>, "mckeen.randy"<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>,
    "mclaughlin.heather"<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>,
    "macpherson.don"<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>,
    ron@knowbrainer.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca, Annette.Caines@justice.gc.ca,
    catharine.wilson@gnb.ca, legal@fredericton.ca,
    PoliceCommission-Commissiondepolice@gnb.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca
    Cc: rene@actuslaw.com, jason.cooling@gnb.ca, oldmaison
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, premier
    <premier@gov.ab.ca>, andremurraynow <andremurraynow@gmail.com>, andre
    <andre@jafaust.com>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>, sallybrooks25
    <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, evelyngreene <evelyngreene@live.ca>,
    jwambolt@nbnet.nb.ca, Anne.M.Richard@gnb.ca

    This video is comical (maybe it will go viral)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFoQXeyfsbs&feature=youtu.be

    Clearly I backed up Andre Murray your former friend even though you
    and Sally Brooks and Evelyn Greene would not N'esy Pas Chucky Baby?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbbmVnRsIh8&feature=youtu.be

    Hell I even posted his entire email within his blog teasing me about ranting

    http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/03/fwd-audio-video-criminal-assault-who-is.html

    http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/2013/03/audio-video-evidence-of-assault-who-is.html

    Obviously the Fat Fred City Finest charged the wrong dude as usual
    because Rodgers is a stooge for the corrupt cops just like you.
    Clearly Andre Murray made a point of proving it and before he goes to
    court this morning he sent your pals Sally and Jenn and even mean old
    me further proof of what I have been saying about you ever since you
    labelled me as a Hells Angel in 2004 then teased me about your buddy
    Dan Busierres ilegally barring me from the Legislative properties.

     That said this is really funny the bullshit coming from CBC on a
    daily basis kills me

    http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/03/12/public-intervenor/

    this was sick and sad and funny too

    http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.ca/2008/04/jason-cooling-former-bodyguard-to.html

    Small wonder why I save every word of things that concern N'esy Pas Chucky
    Baby?

    Veritas Vincit
    David Ramond Amos
    902 800 0369

     ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Andre Murray <andremurraynow@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 02:21:09 -0300
    Subject: Re: AUDIO VIDEO CRIMINAL ASSAULT... WHO IS THE VICTIM?
    Members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE somehow decided that Neil Rodgers
    is the victim
    To: "sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca"<sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, charles leblanc
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Evelyn Greene <evelyngreene@live.ca>, David
    Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, jwambolt@nbnet.nb.ca

    March 13, 2013,

    Hello Sally,
                      good to hear back from you, I must admit I hesitated to
    include your email address in the first group of my mass email, campaign to
    educate people as to what it means to live in Fredericton, New Brunswick.

    I do truly miss you, and our times together as confusing as they were.

    The SYSTEM appears to be working according to THEIR plans to keep us all
    divided amongst ourselves, or at least not trusting each other as I believe
    this is their plan.  In any case, I have sent a copy of the audio video to
    Charles Leblanc to see if he is going to offer or deny his support of
    members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE.

    I hope what David Amos has been saying about Charles Leblanc which appear
    to me that David Amos believes Charles Leblanc is a FREDERICTON POLICE
    FORCEprovocateur, I hope this does not become entirely true in my
    mind.

    The consequences of Charles Leblanc not publishing the audio video.

    This is evidence that I am not guilty of assault, which is also evidence
    of as Charles Leblanc claims that his nemesis, FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE are
    once again victimizing the innocent.

    Once again before I sign off, I always enjoyed our times together, as crazy
    as the times may have been. You know what I mean by that, right.

    Once again here is the ink to the subject audio/video evidence:
    http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/2013/03/audio-video-evidence-of-assault-who-is.html

    Also to be sure, I have never intended any disrespect to you.

    Sincerely without malice, aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity.
    ___________________Andre Murray


    On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:35 PM, sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca<
    sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca> wrote:

    > I am disappointed in how disrespectful you were to me but I wish you luck
    > tomorrow.
    >
    > The below will be of interest to you and may be helpful.
    >
    > Courts Woman changes tune about knife attack **
    >  By DON MACPHERSON
    > macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com
    > **12 Mar 2013 06:45PM**
    > A prosecutor withdrew an assault charge against a Fredericton man in court
    > Monday, noting authorities will likely pursue an investigation against the
    > alleged complainant in the case.
    > Payton Walter Armstrong, 44, of 16 Gilbert St., Apt. 7, had previously
    > waived his right to a bail hearing in provincial court and pleaded guilty
    > to an indictable count of assault against Robin Leslie Monteith Tupy,
    > alleging a Feb. 21 offence.
    > He was scheduled to appear in court for sentencing Monday, but duty
    > counsel Rick Cove, representing Armstrong, said his client instead was
    > moving to withdraw his guilty plea.
    > In an unusual move, Crown prosecutor Claude Haché consented to the motion,
    > and once Judge Julian Dickson granted it, Haché withdrew the assault
    > charge.
    > He explained when the city police initial received the assault report, the
    > complainant, Tupy, told officers she was the victim of an unprovoked
    > attack
    > by Armstrong. She provided a sworn, video-recorded statement to that
    > effect, Haché said.
    > A few days later, he said, Tupy provided police with a second statement.
    > “A lot of the incident had now changed (in the new statement),” the
    > prosecutor said.
    > In the second statement, the woman reported she’d initially assaulted
    > Armstrong and then he assaulted her.
    > Haché said Tupy provided a third statement indicating she’d assaulted
    > Armstrong and then she’d grabbed a knife and held it to herself,
    > threatening to do herself harm.
    > In that final statement, she said Armstrong came at her to get the knife
    > away from her.
    > Haché said the Crown plans to proceed with an unspecified charge against
    > Tupy.
    > Dockson granted the Crown motion to withdraw the charge and told Armstrong
    > he was free to go.
    > Tupy was present in court for Monday’s proceedings, though she left the
    > courthouse before Armstrong was released from custody by sheriff’s
    > officers.
    > He had been in custody since his arrest March 1, meaning he served 10 days
    > behind bars as a result of the apparently false allegations.
    > When approached by The Daily Gleaner at the courthouse Monday following
    > his release, Armstrong declined to comment.
    >
    >  *From:* Andre Murray <andremurraynow@gmail.com>
    > *To:* "Reid, Anne (JUS)"<Anne.Reid@gnb.ca>; "Alchorn, Kathy"<
    > kathy.alchorn@fredericton.ca>; Annette.Caines@justice.gc.ca; Access to
    > Information <Access.Information@gnb.ca>; "Astle, Cheryl (JAG/JPG)"<
    > Cheryl.Astle@gnb.ca>; "Broadley, Tracy (JAG/JPG)"<Tracy.Broadley@gnb.ca>;
    > keith.ball@gnb.ca; Michael Bray <michael.bray@gnb.ca>;
    > brad.woodside@fredericton.ca; "Carleton, Craig (JUS)"<
    > Craig.Carleton@gnb.ca>; melissa.grant@justice.gc.ca; "Wilson, Catharine
    > (JUS)"<catharine.wilson@gnb.ca>; charles leblanc <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
    > "Copp, Danny"<danny.copp@fredericton.ca>; "Thériault, Denis (JAG/JPG)"<
    > Denis.Theriault@gnb.ca>; "MacPherson, Don"<
    > macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>; LEGAL DEPARTMENT <legal@fredericton.ca>;
    > Police Commission / Commission de police <
    > PoliceCommission-Commissiondepolice@gnb.ca>; "Trevors, Hon. Robert
    > (DPS/MSP)"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>; Evelyn Greene <evelyngreene@live.ca>;
    > ginette.hannan@gnb.ca; Nathalie.LeBlanc@gnb.ca;
    > bettydanielski@hotmail.com;
    > hilary.drain@gnb.ca; "Mahoney, Sarah (JUS)"<Sarah.Mahoney@gnb.ca>;
    > "Lingley, Jeff"<jeff.lingley@fredericton.ca>; "Quartermain, Kim"<
    > kim.quartermain@fredericton.ca
    >; mcu@justice.gc.ca; NBPC@gnb.ca;
    > "Williams, Julie (NBPC)"<Julie.Williams@gnb.ca>; "Philibert, Pauline
    > (NBPC)"<Pauline.Philibert@gnb.ca>; "Peddle, Madonna"<
    > madonna.peddle@fredericton.ca>
    ; "Ramsay, Tanya"<
    > Tanya.ramsay@fredericton.ca>; Ron Howse <ron@knowbrainer.ca>; "Toole, Joy
    > (JAG/JPG)"<Joy.Toole@gnb.ca>; sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca
    > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 12, 2013 6:49:15 PM
    >
    > *Subject:* AUDIO VIDEO CRIMINAL ASSAULT... WHO IS THE VICTIM? Members of
    > FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE somehow decided that Neil Rodgers is the victim
    >
    > Hello to those whom cherish justice,
    >
    > please be advised that I will be posting this email correspondence on
    > Justice Done Dirt Cheap
    > http://justicedonedirtcheap.blogspot.ca/2013/03/audio-video-evidence-of-assault-who-is.htmland
    > respectfully request that you do the same on your most popular, the voice
    > of Fredericton Blog as I am sure the public appreciates.
    >
    > Please find herein enclosed a link to an Audio Video recording which is
    > substantive material evidence filed with Provincial Court of New Brunswick
    > and the Crown Prosecutors Office.
    >
    > Please Be advised that March 13, 2013, a scheduled Hearing of 2:00 PM for
    > the Hearing and Trial of matters concerning Criminal Assault, Breach of
    > Undertaking and a third matter which is the question of the validity of
    > the
    > subject Undertaking which was coerced from myself Andre Murray, under
    > threat of jail time in Saint John, by members of FREDERICTON POLICE FORCE,
    > who were at that time holding me in a jail cell, at the downtown, Police
    > Station at 311 Queen Street, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
    >
    >
    >
    > Sincerely without malice, aforethought, ill will, vexation, or frivolity .
    >
    > Andre Murray
    >


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: "Claude Aubin"<aubinc@cactuscom.com>; "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>;
    "marc.garneau.a1"<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
    <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
    ; "MulcaT"<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>;
    <presse@philippecouillard.com>
    ; <montreal@philippecouillard.com>;
    <meerang.rb@gmail.com>; <media@georgetakach.ca>; <info@georgetakach.ca>;
    <info@martincauchon.ca>; <media@martincauchon.ca>;
    <policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com>; <media.karenforcanada@gmail.com>;
    <media@davidbertschi.ca>; <info@pierremoreau.ca>
    Cc: <peter.penashue@parl.gc.ca>; <Darcey@metisonline.ca>; <jriche@innu.ca>;
    <trussell@nunatukavut.ca>; <minister@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca>;
    <ministre@ec.gc.ca>; <Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca>;
    <DuaneM@metisnation.ca>; <info@pco-bcp.gc.ca>;
    <peter.penashue@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
    ; <info@metisnation.ca>;
    <brycefequet@metisnationofcanada.com>; <info@claudeaubinmetis.com>; "David
    Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; "ppalmater"
    <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
    >; <news@northwebpress.com>;
    <appa@sen.parl.gc.ca>; <bcm@international.gc.ca>; "RBauer"
    <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>; "bginsberg"<bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
    Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:57 PM
    Subject: Yo Harper Just exactly how dumb is your French buddy Claude
    Aubin????


    Just Dave
    By Location  Visit Detail
    Visit 18,799
    Domain Name   gc.ca ? (Canada)
    IP Address   198.103.111.# (Privy Council Office)
    ISP   GTIS
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
    State/Region  :  Ontario
    City  :  Ottawa
    Lat/Long  :  45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
    Language   English (U.S.) en-us
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Firefox
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0
    Javascript   version 1.5
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
    Color Depth  :  24 bits
    Time of Visit   Jan 23 2013 5:10:21 pm
    Last Page View   Jan 23 2013 5:12:20 pm
    Visit Length   1 minute 59 seconds
    Page Views   2
    Referring URL  http://www.google.ca...248874,
    d.aWc&cad=rja
    Search Engine  google.ca
    Search Words  david amos
    Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
    Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blo...per-
    and-bankers.html
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-5:00
    Visitor's Time   Jan 23 2013 4:10:21 pm
    Visit Number   18,799

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: "elisabeth.graff"<elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "weststar"
    <weststar@telus.net>; "premier"<premier@gov.bc.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; "david.akin"
    <david.akin@sunmedia.ca>
    Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:33 PM
    Subject: Fwd: DOD Auditor General and alan.white@cbc.ca


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos
    Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
    Subject: DOD Auditor General and   alan.white@cbc.ca
    To: "alan.white@cbc.ca"<alan.white@cbc.ca>, oldmaison
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>

    Just Dave
    By Location > Visit Detail
    Visit 19,128
    Domain Name   dnd.ca ? (Canada)
    IP Address   131.137.247.# (Defence Research Establishment-Ottawa)
    ISP   Defense Research Establishment
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
    State/Region  :  Ontario
    City  :  Ottawa
    Lat/Long  :  45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
    Language   English (U.S.) en-us
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Internet Explorer 7.0
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
    InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
    3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
    Javascript   version 1.3
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1280 x 800
    Color Depth  :  32 bits
    Time of Visit   Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
    Last Page View   Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
    Visit Length   0 seconds
    Page Views   1
    Referring URL
    http://www.bing.com/search?q=alan.white@cbc.ca&src=IE-SearchBox
    Search Engine  bing.com
    Search Words  alan.white@cbc.ca
    Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/10/for-record.html
    Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/10/for-record.html
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-4:00
    Visitor's Time   Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
    Visit Number   19,128

    QSLS Politics
    By Location > Visit Detail
    Visit 30,501
    Domain Name   gc.ca ? (Canada)
    IP Address   192.197.72.# (Office of the Auditor General of Canada)
    ISP   Office of the Auditor General of Canada
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
    State/Region  :  Quebec
    City  :  Gatineau
    Lat/Long  :  45.4833, -75.65 (Map)
    Language   English (Canada) en-ca
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Internet Explorer 8.0
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
    CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR
    3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
    Javascript   version 1.3
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1613 x 1008
    Color Depth  :  32 bits
    Time of Visit   Mar 15 2013 7:10:33 pm
    Last Page View   Mar 15 2013 7:15:45 pm
    Visit Length   5 minutes 12 seconds
    Page Views   3
    Referring URL
    Visit Entry Page
    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
    Visit Exit Page
    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-4:00
    Visitor's Time   Mar 15 2013 2:10:33 pm
    Visit Number   30,501

    Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:08:42 -0800 (PST)
    From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
    Subject: So do ya think Harper ordered CBC to ignore me or Heenan? (: Or
    could it be Dick Cheney :)
    To: Ombudsman@cbc.ca, ombudsman@radio-canada.ca,
    newsroom@allheadlinenews.com, jromanelli@hfxnews.ca, cfleming@hfxnews.ca,
    pramsay@amherstdaily.com, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
    Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca, Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
    Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, egarris2@antiwar.com, btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca,
    Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com,
    martine.turcotte@bell.ca, premier@gov.ns.ca, McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca
    CC: tjconnel@gannett.com, jchretien@heenan.ca, rheenan@heenan.ca,
    bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, broy@ogilvyrenault.com,
    kmearn@mpdmilton.org, governorlynch@nh.gov, mayor@ci.boston.ma.us,
    kinsella@stu.ca, mcomeau@stu.ca, ruby@ruby-edwardh.com,
    Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca, Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca,
    atlantic@ctv.ca, smurphy@ctv.ca, Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca, Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca,
    Regan.G@parl.gc.ca, Savage.M@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca,
    news-tips@nytimes.com, foreign@nytimes.com, dinoratt@telus.net,
    editor@thetyee.ca

    It has been a couple of days since the one honest lady and from CBC emailed
    me and
    nobody calls while the Feds kill my email account?

    Don't that just piss me off  when I see you checking my work to beat the the
    band?

    What are you doing in Upper Canada?

    Are ya waiting for me to blog your nonsense or just sue ya?

    David Raymond Amos <davidramos@xplornet.com> wrote:

    From: "David Raymond Amos"<davidramos@xplornet.com>
    To: <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>, <newsroom@nbpub.com>,
    <carl.davies@gnb.ca>,
    <janet.trail@gnb.ca>, <Akoschany@ctv.ca>, <jtravers@thestar.ca>,
    <warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >, <cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com>,
    <Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    "Spinks Spinks"<spinks08@hotmail.com>, <seanoshaughnessy@rogers.com>,
    <jonesr@cbc.ca>, <mleger@stu.ca>, <jwalker@stu.ca>, <plee@stu.ca>,
    <dwatch@web.net>, <Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca>, <oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com>,
    <btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca>, <trenchcoatblog@yahoo.ca>, <Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca>,
    <advocacycollective@yahoo.com>
    , <MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca>,
    <collins.moncton-east@hotmail.com>, <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>,
    <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
    <Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca>, <Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca>,
    <abel.leblanc@gnb.ca>, <eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca>, <Scott.A@parl.gc.ca>,
    <John.Foran@gnb.ca>, <premier@gnb.ca>, <Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca>
    ,
    <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    <chris.goodwin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , <info@cisnb-srcnb.ca>,
    <bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    CC: <bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <Oda.B@parl.gc.ca>,
    <paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Henry McCandless"<hemccand@shaw.ca>,
    <dwatch@web.net>, <president@utoronto.ca>, <rbrant@mccarthy.ca>,
    <bsullivan@wc.com>, <jimwilson@telus.net>, <info@lymedisease.org>,
    <lbj1@pacbell.net>, <ottawa@chuckstrahl.com>, <riding@chuckstrahl.com>,
    <chris.cunningham@utoronto>, <bpel@mccarthy.ca>, <Catboat15@aol.com>,
    <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>, <Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca>,
    <solberg.m@parl.gc.ca>, <thompson.g@parl.gc.ca>, <toews.v@parl.gc.ca>,
    <Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>, <ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>,
    <fbinhct@leo.gov>, <patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov>
    ,
    <Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov>,
    <stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com
    >, <olived@sen.parl.gc.ca>,
    <bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, <broy@ogilvyrenault.com>,
    <cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com
    >, <stronach.b@parl.gc.ca>,
    <day.s@parl.gc.ca>, <duffy@ctv.ca>,
    <tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com>, <mikemurphymla@hotmail.com>,
    <dykstrafarms@hotmail.com>
    Subject: Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp known as CBC
    Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:22:27 -0400

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: David Raymond Amos
    To: office@AJAs.ca
    Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:38 AM
    Subject: Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp known as CBC



    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ombudsman de Radio-Canada"<ombudsman@radio-canada.ca>
    To: "David Raymond Amos"<davidramos@xplornet.com>
    Cc: "CBC Ombudsman"<Ombudsman@cbc.ca>
    Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 12:00 PM
    Subject: {Spam?} Rép. : Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp
    known as CBC


    Dear Sir:

     I write to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail and your voice mail, which I
    have shared with the office of the Ombudsman of the English network. It will
    follow up with your request.
    For more information, you can consult CBC Ombudsman's web site:
    http://www.cbc.ca/ombudsman/

    Best regards,

    Laure Simonet
    Assistant of the Ombudsman, French Services
    Société Radio-Canada

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:47:29 -0400
    Subject: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and political spats
    To: andrew.weaver@greenparty.bc.ca
    , leader@greenparty.bc.ca,
    weaver@ocean.seos.uvic.ca, ida.chong.mla@leg.bc.ca,
    michael.byers@ubc.ca, colivier@theprovince.com, leader
    <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader <leader@actionparty.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , editor@desmogblog.com,
    judy@yesbc.ca, mhager@postmedia.com

    http://www.theprovince.com/news/Green+Party+candidate+pressured+election/7691565/story.html#axzz2Eyjd6DI9

    http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Star+Green+party+candidate+Andrew+Weaver+says+Democrat+asked/7691247/story.html

    http://www.theprovince.com/news/Green+Party+candidate+pressured+election/7691565/story.html#axzz2Eyjd6DI9

    http://www.desmogblog.com/weaver-sues-tim-ball-libel

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: <josh@bccla.org>; <Carmen@bccla.org>; <sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>
    ;
    <gaetan.caron@neb-one.gc.ca>; <ted@tedhsu.ca>; <Ted.Hsu@parl.gc.ca>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; <gplant@heenan.ca>;
    <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "joe.oliver.c1"<joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>
    Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:56 PM
    Subject: Perhap somebody should ask Joe Oliver some serious questions ASAP
    EH Ted Hsu?


    http://bccla.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/20130114-NEB-Letter.pdf

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    To: <gplant@heenan.ca>; <james@jameskeller.ca>; <dbennett@cp.org>
    Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ;
    <sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>
    ; <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>
    Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 4:35 PM
    Subject: The lawyer Leggett and her legal cohorts are too too funny
    sometimes EH Mr Plant?


    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/09/06/bc-geoff-plant-enbridge-hearings.html?cmp=rss

    http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=5119

    Geoff Plant, Q.C.bPartner
    Vancouver 604 891.1186
    Victoria 250 381.9321
    gplant@heenan.ca


    http://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/contact/elisabeth-graff-654409/

    Elisabeth Graff
    Solicitor
    Called to the bar: 2008 (BC)
    Justice (BC), Min. of
    Abor. Law - Environ., Resource & Abor. Law Group
    PO Box 9220, Stn. Prov. Govt
    Victoria, British Columbia V8W 9J1
    Phone: 250-356-1155 Ext:
    Fax: 250-356-8939
    Email: elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca

    http://www.ipe.ualberta.ca/en/EventsandSeminars/ChinaandIndiaGlobalPowerShiftO/SpeakerProfiles/JohnCarruthers.aspx

    http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+Attorney+General+Geoff+Plant+represent+Northern+Gateway+hearings/7199978/story.html

    http://www.thecanadianpress.com/english/marketing/contacts/CPContactsEnglish.pdf

    http://www.jameskeller.ca/contact/

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-lawyer-grills-northern-gateway-president-on-enbridges-liability/article4526907/

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:07:18 -0300
    Subject: BTW Heather Remember when Harper stopped the BHP Potash deal?
    To: martinhea39@gmail.com
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:44:45 -0300
    Subject: I just called from 902 800 0369 Perhaps the Qatari Embassy
    should study the attachments closely EH Mr Alward?
    To: musoviczl@repsol.com, pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com
    Cc: ottawa@mofa.gov.qa, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, David Amos
    <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
    leader <leader@greenparty.ca>

    Qatari Embassy in Ottawa, Canada
    800-150 Metcalfe Street
    Ottawa Ontario K2P 1P1
    Telephone (+1) 613 241 4917
     E-mail ottawa@mofa.gov.qa
    http://www.repsolenergy.com/rena_team/rena_team.html

    http://www.repsolenergy.com/press_room/press_room.html

    http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/kuwait-koweit/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/fs-qatar-fd.aspx?lang=eng&view=d

    http://www.nccar.ca/statements/news-releases/establishment-of-the-embassy-of-qatar-in-canadaune-ambassade-du-qatar-a-ottawa/

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 01:07:11 -0400
    Subject: YO Nathan Cullen WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPORTING,
    JOURNALISM AND PROPAGANDA???
    To: cullen1 <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, gsmith@classicrockcfnr.ca,
    dquan@postmedia.com, merv@northwebpress.com, charlie@straight.com, pm
    <pm@pm.gc.ca>, president@ubcic.bc.ca,
    palmater@indigenousnationhood.com, ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca,
    radical <radical@radicalpress.com>, hjk <hjk@quesnelbc.com>,
    "macpherson.don"<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>,
    "mclaughlin.heather"<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>, acampbell
    <acampbell@ctv.ca>, "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, Jessica Hume
    <jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , vivian.krause@mac.com,
    Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org

    I believe that only propaganda exists these days. The other two terms
    are merely myths that bullshitters use to jusify greedy wordsmiths who
    try to wax poetic for whomever will pay them the most. If all else
    fails the corporations hire the cheapest help they can get for local
    events and just cut and paste and print and pay some other dude for
    the fancy words to elp sell their newsrag. Original thought and common
    sense evaporated with veritical intigration or whatever the evil
    corporate bastards wish to call these days.

    http://www.ubcic.bc.ca/about/executive.htm#axzz2Gn4tlS9t

    Perhaps some clever Indian in BC will ask me why I ran against Andy
    Scott when he was the Minister of Indian Affairs EH John Duncan? I see
    folks in your neck of the woods checking my work alot lately. No doubt
    some of it is because of the upcoming election and the doings between
    me and the Wally Opal and the RCMP back in 2005. However there is the
    doings between the NEB and I in 2006 but that bullshit only involves
    mere matters of money and the environment. YOU cannot deny that the
    Minister of Indian Affairs has had Hard Copy of my concerns since 2004
    and THAT involves the Captial Crime known and MURDER. YOUR head office
    is in Amherst Nova Scotia which well within MY stomping gounds. Thus
    that is where I will serve you the summons in order to bring the RCMP
    and your lawyers to Federal Court CORRECT Minister Duncan? Perhaps you
    should call the RCMP in Amherst Nova Scotia and ask them about the
    documents and CD I served on them with a witness who has my Durable
    Power of Attorney in August of 2012 in order to bring everything up to
    date.

    FYI its mostly the same materail that Wally Opal and the lawyer
    Shirley Heafey as the Commissioer of Public Complaints Against the
    RCMP received byway of registered US Mail (signature required) in 2005

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/7625653/Indian-Affairs

    http://www.straight.com/news/grand-chief-stewart-phillip-stephen-harper-attacked-first-nations-rights-2012

    http://www.terracedaily.ca/show10549a0x300y1z/THE_DIFFERENCE_BETWEEN_REPORTING_JOURNALISM_AND_PROPAGANDA_

    http://www.classicrockcfnr.ca/index.php/on-air/nationview-journeys-archives/

    Air Date: December 14, 2012
    The Union of BC Indian Chiefs has announced they are ready and willing
    to take legal action against the Federal Government over concerns of
    the potential Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion & Protection
    Agreement (FIPPA). President of the UBCIC Grand Chief Stewart Phillip
    explains what a potential international free-trade agreement would
    mean for the environment and country. Meanwhile Reporter Jon Brown
    speaks with BC Conservative Leader John Cummins who's making a
    northern tour.

    Interview Segment: Grand Chief Stewart Phillip & Conservative Leader
    John Cummins

    http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/nvgt.do?lang=eng&prtl=1&sbPrtl=&estblmntNo=123456126441&profile=cmpltPrfl&profileId=501&app=sold

    QSLS Politics
    By Location  Visit Detail
    Visit 29,838
    Domain Name   shawcable.net ? (Network)
    IP Address   70.67.22.# (Shaw Communications)
    ISP   Shaw Communications
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
    State/Region  :  British Columbia
    City  :  Comox
    Lat/Long  :  49.6833, -124.9333 (Map)
    Language   English (U.K.) en-gb
    Operating System   Microsoft WinNT
    Browser   Firefox
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0
    Javascript   version 1.5
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1366 x 768
    Color Depth  :  24 bits
    Time of Visit   Dec 26 2012 10:28:18 pm
    Last Page View   Dec 26 2012 10:28:18 pm
    Visit Length   0 seconds
    Page Views   1
    Referring URL  http://www.google.ca...LAqq-
    gLgM&usg=AFQjCN
    Search Engine  google.ca
    Search Words  whistle blower charged with defamation bc
    Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....es-
    libel-charge.html
    Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....es-
    libel-charge.html
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-8:00
    Visitor's Time   Dec 26 2012 1:28:18 pm
    Visit Number   29,838


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:00:26 -0400
    Subject: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan Cullen
    To: vivian.krause@mac.com, joel@renewalpartners.com, "ross.mcmillan"
    <ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org
    >, charlie@straight.com,
    "gregor.robertson"<gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca
    >,
    info@forestethics.org, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca,
    harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
    enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca
    Cc: cullen1@parl.gc.ca, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , oig
    <oig@sec.gov>, oig <oig@ftc.gov>, todd@forestethics.org

    http://forestethics.org/todd-paglia-executive-director-responds-lastest-news-canada

    Cullen to question Enbridge, government at JRP in February
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    DECEMBER 12, 2012

    Prince Rupert – MP Nathan Cullen will next appear before the National
    Energy Board's Enbridge Joint Review Panel (JRP) in February.

    Cullen will question witnesses from Enbridge on emergency preparedness
    and response mechanisms that would be established to deal with oil
    spills.

    Later in the spring, Cullen will also cross-examine Department of
    Fisheries and Oceans officials about federal assessments of the
    project’s environmental impacts.

    JRP hearings continue in Prince Rupert this week and are set to resume
    there on February 4.  The panel will sit for two-week rotations until
    early spring and must issue its recommendation by the end of 2013.


    - 30 -

    Contact: Shelley Browne, cullen1@parl.gc.ca 250-877-4140


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:31:34 -0300
    Subject: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the left
    versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
    To: kcryderman@calgaryherald.com, tips@660news.com,
    david.cournoyer@gmail.com, Lee.Richardson@gov.ab.ca,
    jason.kenney.c1@parl.gc.ca, Elizabeth.May.C1@parl.gc.ca,
    Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, leader
    <leader@actionparty.ca>, donn@petroxcapital.ca,
    albertadiary@gmail.com, support@erinotoole.ca, editor@oakbaynews.com,
    info@joancrockatt.ca
    Cc: vin@vincentstpierre.com, rahim@tedxcalgary.ca,
    harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
    datkins@oceancapitalpartners.com, galloway@uvic.ca,
    paulsummerville@shaw.ca, mrankin@murrayrankin.ca,
    murray@murrayrankinndp.ca, elizabeth@elizabethcull.ca,
    charleyberesford@gmail.com, loriacreative@yahoo.com,
    info@innermusica.com, rscollis@gmail.com

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By-elections_to_the_41st_Canadian_Parliament#cite_note-Kady-20

    http://victoriavision.blogspot.ca/

    http://alberta.ca/albertafiles/includes/directorysearch/goaBrowse.cfm?txtSearch=Executive%20Branch&Ministry=EXC&LevelID=17734&userid=106619

    http://www.calgaryliberal.com/2012/09/14/liberal-nomination-12-the-race-for-calgary-centre/

    http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/politics/Liberals+choose+candidate+Calgary+Centre/7277510/story.html

    http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2012/09/strikebreaker-condemns-joan-crockatt-for-role-in-calgary-herald-strike/

    http://daveberta.ca/2012/08/calgary-centre-nomination-update/


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:31:34 -0300
    Subject: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the left
    versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
    To: kcryderman@calgaryherald.com, tips@660news.com,
    david.cournoyer@gmail.com, Lee.Richardson@gov.ab.ca,
    jason.kenney.c1@parl.gc.ca, Elizabeth.May.C1@parl.gc.ca,
    Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, leader
    <leader@actionparty.ca>, donn@petroxcapital.ca,
    albertadiary@gmail.com, support@erinotoole.ca, editor@oakbaynews.com,
    info@joancrockatt.ca
    Cc: vin@vincentstpierre.com, rahim@tedxcalgary.ca,
    harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
    datkins@oceancapitalpartners.com, galloway@uvic.ca,
    paulsummerville@shaw.ca, mrankin@murrayrankin.ca,
    murray@murrayrankinndp.ca, elizabeth@elizabethcull.ca,
    charleyberesford@gmail.com, loriacreative@yahoo.com,
    info@innermusica.com, rscollis@gmail.com

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By-elections_to_the_41st_Canadian_Parliament#cite_note-Kady-20

    http://victoriavision.blogspot.ca/

    http://alberta.ca/albertafiles/includes/directorysearch/goaBrowse.cfm?txtSearch=Executive%20Branch&Ministry=EXC&LevelID=17734&userid=106619

    http://www.calgaryliberal.com/2012/09/14/liberal-nomination-12-the-race-for-calgary-centre/

    http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/politics/Liberals+choose+candidate+Calgary+Centre/7277510/story.html

    http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2012/09/strikebreaker-condemns-joan-crockatt-for-role-in-calgary-herald-strike/

    http://daveberta.ca/2012/08/calgary-centre-nomination-update/

    From: Josipa Petrunic <enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca>
    Subject: Follow up
    To: "David Amos"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Received: Sunday, June 5, 2011, 8:45 PM

    Dear David,

    Apologies for the delay in my response. This week was jammed with
    board meetings for our riding and a massive volunteer appreciation BBQ
    that we held yesterday. I'm just catching up on messages now.

    Apropos the information you sent to me, I found it very interesting.
    In fact, here in Calgary East, I'm planning a series of
    workshops/public lectures that look at "Corruption in Canada". My
    policy team and I are meeting this week to discuss the items you sent
    to me and your case in particular to see what we can do in terms of,
    at least, bringing some public awareness to this case and other cases
    of corruption and questionable practices in Canadian governance and
    government relations with businesses.

    Do make sure to send us a follow up on what you decide to do, apropos
    your proposed law suit. I will share the information with my team.

    As my own follow up question, though, why have you sent me this
    material as opposed to approaching your local MP and/or Liberal
    candidate? Surely others would be interested too.

    I know Ted. He's a great person and he'll be a wonderful MP. Do let me
    know what transpires on that front.

    Best of luck in your efforts. We'll chat soon,

    Josipa
    --
    Josipa Petrunic
    Liberal Party Candidate
    Federal constituency of Calgary East
    www.josipapetrunic.ca
    www.facebook.com/votejosipa
    Phone: 403-719-6253

    From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: Josipa I will try calling you again (902 800 0369) BTW I am
    not a local nor am I a liberal
    To: enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca
    Cc: ted@tedhsu.ca, David Amos
    Received: Monday, May 23, 2011, 10:38 PM

    Say hey to Ted Hsu

    I explained myself to your sister Ana ( who was quite nice) She
    obviously told you I had called after you responded to my first emaiI.
    She told me you were heading out to debate that night so I sent you
    the email with the attachemnt about BHP and Potash Corp so you could
    embarass some Conservatives as to why Harper stopped the hostile
    takeover last year but clearly you did not read it in time for the
    election but there is still a bit of time to stir the pot before the
    Speech from the Throne in June

    Anyway to answer your question I am the whistleblower that inspired
    this hearing in Washington DC before I came home and ran for public
    office 4 times in Canada between 2004 and 2006 then got stuck here
    without my wife and kids

    http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1

    http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2

    The first email I sent you had this pdf file attached and Ted got it too.

    www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.pdf

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos

    P.S. The rest of this email and its attachment contains just one of
    the reasons Stockwell Day quit.

    From: Josipa Petrunic <enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca>
    Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:26:34 -0400
    Subject: Reading your message
    To: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

    Hi David -

    I just heard your message (sort of) on the telephone.
    Unfortunately the line is garbled and all I could hear was your name and
    a mention of a Senate website site. The rest is mostly garbled for some
    reason and I can't make out your phone number or the website you were
    trying to direct me towards. Were you on a cell phone, by chance? It
    sounds like digital interference on the phone.

    That said, I have indeed scanned through the emails you sent to me,
    but I have a number of questions, as the order of the emails is all
    over the place and it's
    hard for me to track what happened when and who you were responding to
    at certain times.

    I thought that it might be easier for you to come to
    one of our meetings (i.e. our board meeting on June 1st). We always
    leave a slot of time for people from the community, like yourself, to
    talk about issues thought to be important and which we, as Liberals, can
    talk about.

    Indeed, as I'm developing a lecture series for Calgary
    East right now, it might be worthwhile having you succinctly explain the
    situation and your role in whistleblowing, so that I can grasp the
    issues at hand.

    In the meantime, could you email me your number and a
    link to the website you mentioned. I can start by looking at the site.

    Cheers, Josipa
    ---
    Josipa Petrunic
    Liberal Party Candidate
    Federal
    constituency of Calgary East
    www.josipapetrunic.ca [1]
    www.facebook.com/votejosipa [2]
    Phone: 403-719-6253


    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Subject: Fwd: Ted perhaps you should mention this email to the lawyers
    Sean Casey, Dominic Leblanc, Bob Rae and Ralph Goodale ASAP
    To: ted@tedhsu.ca
    Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
    Received: Friday, May 20, 2011, 2:33 PM

    When you responded once again to the earlier email I figured it was
    not you who blocked the email I was calling about. Ask yourself who
    blocked this email to you and why. BTW after I called you and left a
    message about this I did as I promised and called Bob Rae's office as
    well. He did ot call me back but i saw his help checking my work on
    the web while we talked.

    Best Regards
    Dave

    --- On Thu, 5/19/11, Ted Hsu <ted@tedhsu.ca> wrote:


    From: Ted Hsu <ted@tedhsu.ca>
    Subject: Re: Ted I figured out it was you who called me back (613 544 8450)
    To: "David Amos"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Received: Thursday, May 19, 2011, 8:18 PM


    Hello David,


    I'm going to go over the contents of your email.


    Regards,


    Ted Hsu


    On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:30 PM, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    wrote:

    Congrats on two fronts.

    One for getting elected

    Two and more importantly to me is the fact that you are the only
    elected politician to returm a call to me this year. No joke.

    That fact alone proves to me that you are the only person who should
    be the liberal leader and our next Prime Minister No joking again.

    because you acted ethiclly with me I will keep this email in
    confidence until we get a chance to talk.

    Best Regards
    Dave

    Please study the text of the email when you get the time but checkout
    the pdf files attached ASAP before the 41st Parliament sits would be
    wise

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:34:44 -0300
    Subject: never-mind-northern-gateway-
    keystone-xl
    To: albertadiary <albertadiary@gmail.com>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    http://albertadiary.ca/2012/01/never-mind-northern-gateway-keystone-xl_17.html

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:35:46 -0300
    Subject: The lawyer Leggett and her legal cohorts are too too funny
    sometimes EH Mr Plant?
    To: gplant@heenan.ca, james@jameskeller.ca, dbennett@cp.org
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ,
    sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/09/06/bc-geoff-plant-enbridge-hearings.html?cmp=rss

    http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=5119

    Geoff Plant, Q.C.bPartner
    Vancouver 604 891.1186
    Victoria 250 381.9321
    gplant@heenan.ca


    http://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/contact/elisabeth-graff-654409/

    Elisabeth Graff
    Solicitor
    Called to the bar: 2008 (BC)
    Justice (BC), Min. of
    Abor. Law - Environ., Resource & Abor. Law Group
    PO Box 9220, Stn. Prov. Govt
    Victoria, British Columbia V8W 9J1
    Phone: 250-356-1155 Ext:
    Fax: 250-356-8939
    Email: elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca

    http://www.ipe.ualberta.ca/en/EventsandSeminars/ChinaandIndiaGlobalPowerShiftO/SpeakerProfiles/JohnCarruthers.aspx

    http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+Attorney+General+Geoff+Plant+represent+Northern+Gateway+hearings/7199978/story.html

    http://www.thecanadianpress.com/english/marketing/contacts/CPContactsEnglish.pdf

    http://www.jameskeller.ca/contact/

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-lawyer-grills-northern-gateway-president-on-enbridges-liability/article4526907/

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    To: <sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>
    ; <gaetan.caron@neb-one.gc.ca>;
    <rowland.harrison@neb-one.gc.ca>; <john.bulger@neb-one.gc.ca>;
    <kenneth.bateman@neb-one.gc.ca
    >; <roland.george@neb-one.gc.ca>;
    <georgette.habib@neb-one.gc.ca
    >; <david.hamilton@neb-one.gc.ca>;
    <kenneth.vollman@neb-one.gc.ca
    >
    Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:02 PM
    Subject: We just talked Ms. Legget I must say you picked a bad day to
    play dumb EH?

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:07:18 -0300
    Subject: BTW Heather Remember when Harper stopped the BHP Potash deal?
    To: martinhea39@gmail.com
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:44:45 -0300
    Subject: I just called from 902 800 0369 Perhaps the Qatari Embassy
    should study the attachments closely EH Mr Alward?
    To: musoviczl@repsol.com, pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com
    Cc: ottawa@mofa.gov.qa, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, David Amos
    <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
    leader <leader@greenparty.ca>

    Qatari Embassy in Ottawa, Canada
    800-150 Metcalfe Street
    Ottawa Ontario K2P 1P1
    Telephone (+1) 613 241 4917
     E-mail ottawa@mofa.gov.qa
    http://www.repsolenergy.com/rena_team/rena_team.html

    http://www.repsolenergy.com/press_room/press_room.html

    http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/kuwait-koweit/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/fs-qatar-fd.aspx?lang=eng&view=d

    http://www.nccar.ca/statements/news-releases/establishment-of-the-embassy-of-qatar-in-canadaune-ambassade-du-qatar-a-ottawa/

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Alan Dark <Alan.Dark@cbc.ca>
    Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:57:14 -0400
    Subject: Re: I just called from 902 800 0369 and tried to talk to you
    Mr Tomick (Out of office)
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email.  Please be advised that I am currently out of
    the office; returning Monday Agust 27th.

    If your matter is urgent, please contact Camilla Inderberg at
    416-205-5545 or by email camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca or Janice Smith
    416-205-2940 or janice.smith@cbc.ca

    Best regards,
    Al



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:03:50 -0300
    Subject: Ask yourself why CBC would report none of this
    To: kim_woima@nexeninc.com, "greg.weston"<greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
    jack.tomik@cbc.ca, alan.dark@cbc.ca
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , jacques_poitras
    <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>

    You do know Landslide Annie is on the Board of Directors of Nexen I hope

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/08/20/f-scott-peterson-cnooc-nexen.html


    http://www.nexeninc.com/en/Governance/BoardofDirectors/BoardBios.aspx

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    To: "thepurplevioletpress"<thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>;
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; <baron@unbsj.ca>; <beacon@stu.ca>; <argosy@mta.ca>;
    <diane@umcs.ca>; <lefront@umoncton.ca>; <oculus@umce.ca>; <eic@theaq.net>;
    <editor@thebruns.ca>; "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>; "fairbairn"<fairbairn@capp.ca>;
    <david.wilkins@nelsonmullins.com>; <Angie.Leonard@capp.ca>;
    <markus.ermisch@capp.ca>; "pknoll"<pknoll@corridor.ca>; "linkejul"
    <linkejul@gmail.com>
    Cc: <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>; <Jim.Balcomb@gnb.ca>; "premier"
    <premier@gnb.ca>; "maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
    <khjnews@astral.com>; <Sam.McEwan@gnb.ca>; "davidc.coon"
    <davidc.coon@gmail.com>; "water"<water@conservationcouncil.ca>
    ;
    "WaterWarCrimes"<waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>; "robin reid"
    <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>; "tom_alexander"<tom_alexander@swn.com>;
    "khalid"<khalid@windsorenergy.ca>; <Paul.Barnes@capp.ca>
    Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:43 AM
    Subject: BTW Chucky I called the Radio Station where your liberal friends
    such as Mckeen works to give the kid Justin who had just subscribed to my
    Twitter account a scoop.


    Anyway you friend Kelly answered the phone even though she admitted
    knowing who i was she played dumb about everything else.

    When I mentioned what your blogging but buddy Danny Boy Fitz published
    below Kelly said that she was not "privy" to it. I laughed because we
    all are. Randy McKeen, Keith Ashfield and the rest of all know that
    was PURE BULLSHIT and that the privy is the best spot for corporate
    journalists to hang out share their sit. Sicial media is the ONLY way
    to go. Too bad so sad for your fans that you are not ethical EH Chucky
    Leblanc??

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/david-amos-vs-fat-fred-citys-finest.html

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    To: <baron@unbsj.ca>; <beacon@stu.ca>; <argosy@mta.ca>; <diane@umcs.ca>;
    <lefront@umoncton.ca>; <oculus@umce.ca>; <eic@theaq.net>;
    <editor@thebruns.ca>; "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>; "fairbairn"<fairbairn@capp.ca>;
    <david.wilkins@nelsonmullins.com>; <Angie.Leonard@capp.ca>;
    <markus.ermisch@capp.ca>; "pknoll"<pknoll@corridor.ca>; "linkejul"
    <linkejul@gmail.com>
    Cc: <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>; <Jim.Balcomb@gnb.ca>; "premier"
    <premier@gnb.ca>; "maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
    <khjnews@astral.com>; <Sam.McEwan@gnb.ca>; "davidc.coon"
    <davidc.coon@gmail.com>; "water"<water@conservationcouncil.ca>
    ;
    "WaterWarCrimes"<waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>; "robin reid"
    <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>; "tom_alexander"<tom_alexander@swn.com>;
    "khalid"<khalid@windsorenergy.ca>; <Paul.Barnes@capp.ca>
    Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:15 AM
    Subject: Re Natural Gas etc Hey Brucy Baby Northrup I tried to talked all
    the wannabe journalists Nobody cared and said just to send another email
    that they will no doubt ignore Go Figure EH?


    Ya think the recent news would make the college kids sit up and pay
    attention. But nope everybody and his dog just wants to play dumb.
    Thus they get the governments they truly deserve

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/01/18/nb-association-defends-angie-leonard.html

    http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/907431/capp-and-the-new-brunswick-oil-and-natural-gas-association-work-to-advance-onshore-development-in-new-brunswick

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-01-19/canada-pledges-to-sell-oil-to-asia-after-obama-rejects-keystone-pipeline.html

    http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/01/18/nb-oil-industry-angie-leonard-516.html

    http://www.newswire.ca/en/story/907431/capp-and-the-new-brunswick-oil-and-natural-gas-association-work-to-advance-onshore-development-in-new-brunswick

    Trust that I will enjoy explaining this emai in FEDERAL court someday.

    Go Figure EH?

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos
    902 800 0369

    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:54:10 -0400
    Subject: Yo David Wilkins No way Jose i am tel the world how evil you
    are No doubt your playing hardball politicking this weekend too N'esy
    Pas Yankee?
    To: david.wilkins@nelsonmullins.com, shannon.odeadawson@capp.ca,
    communication@capp.ca, travis.davies@capp.ca,
    maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>
    Cc: counsel <counsel@barackobama.com>, newt <newt@newt.org>, Barry
    Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Ken.Zielke"<Ken.Zielke@gov.ab.ca>,
    vanlop1 <vanlop1@parl.gc.ca>, toewsv1 <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>,
    "Barry.Shaw"<Barry.Shaw@forces.gc.ca>

    From: David Wilkins <David.Wilkins@nelsonmullins.com>
    Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 16:48:39 -0500
    Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Yo David Wilkins have Mr Baconfatt
    say Hoka Hey to all your clients in Alberta As I deal your evil GOP
    Wannbe Prez Butt Buddies in South Carolina EH?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    I am out of the office on business January 18,19, 20 & 23. I will be
    checking emails periodically. If you need immediate assistance, please
    call my assistant, Ashley Martin at 803-255-9207

    ==============================
    ================================================



    Confidentiality Notice

    This message is intended exclusively for the individual or
    entity to which it is addressed. This communication may
    contain information that is proprietary, privileged,
    confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure.

    If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized
    to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message
    or any part of it.  If you have received this message in
    error, please notify the sender immediately either by
    phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete
    all copies of this message.

    To ensure compliance with the requirements imposed by the
    IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice
    contained in this communication (including the
    attachments) is not intended or written to be used, for
    the purpose of (a) avoiding penalties under the Internal
    Revenue Code or (b) promoting, marketing or recommending
    to another party any transaction or tax-related matter[s].
    To provide you with a communication that could be used to
    avoid penalties under the Internal Revenue Code will
    necessarily entail additional investigations, analysis and
    conclusions on our part.
    ==============================
    ================================================




    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:17:20 -0300
    Subject: Re Danny Williams Vs the Sierra Club Very Interesting lawsuit
    and counterclaim EH Mr Bennnett
    To: jb@sierraclub.ca, lgue@davidsuzuki.org, grenouf
    <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>, editor@theindependent.ca
    Cc: jbaker@ottenheimerbaker.com, info@alderonironore.com,
    ktsakumis@alderonironore.com, "pgleeson@alderonironore.com \"David
    Amos\""<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , jvettese@casselsbrock.com

    http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/125139-muskrat-falls-critic-countersues-williams

    http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/node/4542

    FYI I just call Bruno Marcocchio @ 902-567-1132 and he had no clue as
    to what I was talking about However trust that just like Gretchen
    Fitzgerald, Danny Williams and his corporate pals know EXACTLY who I
    am and why I was calling.

    http://www.tmx.com/en/news_events/exchange_bulletins/bulletins/10-7-2011_TSX-NewListingADV.html

    http://alderonironore.com/corporate/board_directors/

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/05/nfld-whistleblower-dodges-libel-charge.html

    2005 01 T 0010

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
    TRIAL DIVISION
    BETWEEN:

    WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
    AND:
    BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT

    AND BETWEEN:
    BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
    BY COUNTERCLAIM

    AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
    BY COUNTERCLAIM

    AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
    BY COUNTERCLAIM

    AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
    BY COUNTERCLAIM

    AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
    BY COUNTERCLAIM

    AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
    BY COUNTERCLAIM

    AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
    BY COUNTERCLAIM

    AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
    BY COUNTERCLAIM

    SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT

    Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010

    Date of Filing of Document: 25 January 2005

    Name of Filing Party or Person: Stephen J. May

    Application to which Document being filed relates: Amended Application
    of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order
    restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of
    Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it's entirety, and to refer this
    proceeding to case management.

    Statement of purpose in filing: To maintain an Order restricting
    publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike
    the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case
    management.

    A F F I D A V I T

    I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John's, in the Province of
    Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
    as follows:

    THAT I am a Partner in the St. John's office of PATTERSON PALMER
    solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
    Random-Burin-St. George's in the Parliament of Canada.

    THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
    about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
    Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
    publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
    with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
    Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
    mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior's sister.

    THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
    Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my
    Affidavit.

    THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts' letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
    received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
    as Exhibit "2".

    THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
    an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
    was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit.
    Following Mr. Roberts' receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
    that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
    firm closed our file.

    THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
    following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
    allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
    approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
    old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
    accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
    saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
    of the material on the site.

    THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
    the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
    a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews' intentions to
    commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
    web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4"
    to this Affidavit.

    THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
    voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
    of Mr. Prior.

    THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
    from Mr. Amos.

    THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr.
    Amos.

    THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
    e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
    of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews'
    claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews' solicitor. I attach as
    Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
    to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
    whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
    the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
    as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.

    THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
    addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
    Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
    Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
    Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
    Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
    Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
    letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
    received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
    representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
    letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
    his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts' letter also covered
    his reply to Mr. Amos.

    THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
    Sunday, 23 January 2005.

    THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
    Mr. Prior's counterclaim.

    SWORN to before me at
    St. John's, Province of Newfoundland and Labrador this 24th day of
    January, 2005.

    Signed by Della Hart
    STEPHEN J. MAY
    Signature STAMP
    DELLA HART
    A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
    the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. My commission expires on
    December 31, 2009



    ---- Original Message -----
    From: "McKnight, Gisele"McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
    To: lcampenella@ledger.com
    Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
    Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
    Subject: David Amos

    Hello Lisa,

    David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
    an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
    federal
    election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
    Fundy (now called  Fundy-Royal).

    I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
    story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
    by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
    the candidates' debate held June 18.

    As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
    The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.

    I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
    taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
    that ran, but this one is very similar.


    A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG

    Gisele McKnight editor
    Kings County Record
    Sussex, New Brunswick
    Canada
    506-433-1070


    Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd

    By Erin Hatfield

    "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
    world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

    The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
    the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
    watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
    unofficial, theme song for the debate.

    The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
    they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
    Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
    chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
    left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
    mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
    the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.

    The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
    organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
    of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
    and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.

    Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
    responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
    exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
    Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
    other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
    Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
    questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
    relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
    response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
    getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."

    Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
    party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
    well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
    on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
    places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
    shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.

    The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
    one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
    front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
    voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
    Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
    readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
    final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
    register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
    abiding citizens."

    The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
    women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
    yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
    spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.

    Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
    Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
    yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
    post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
    Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
    anyplace," Armstrong responded.

    As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
    candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
    fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
    process for the June 28 vote.

    Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
    favourite possessions—motorcycles.

    McKnight/KCR

    The Unconventional Candidate

    David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But….

    By Gisele McKnight

    FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
    wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
    that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

    Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.

    The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
    and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
    running for office in Canada.

    One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
    to meet Elections Canada requirements.

    When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
    favourite place to do so—Fundy.

    Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
    dissatisfaction with politicians.

    "I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
    said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

    The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
    1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
    needed to change his life.

    "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
    sometimes in midlife."

    So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
    motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
    Panhead motorcycle.

    "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
    experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
    renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
    for anything, but you take what they offer."

    For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
    and conversation all over North America.

    Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
    and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
    himself.

    He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
    rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
    individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
    Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."

    Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.

    "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
    "It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"

    Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.

    "I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
    interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
    call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."

    And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.

    "I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
    not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."

    What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
    the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
    name a few.

    "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs – fishing,
    farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
    death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
    (NAFTA) out the window.

    NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
    easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.

    Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.

    "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
    especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
    Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."

    Although…if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
    your X by his name.

    "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
    say, 'what the hell.'"


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:01:00 -0300
    Subject: RE John Conway of the University of Regina and his published
    opinion of the demise of the NDP In SK
    To: John.Conway@uregina.ca, voices@operationmaple.com, bwall
    <bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>,
    bboyd@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, pr@potashcorp.com,
    Podwika@potashcorp.com, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
    corporate.relations@potashcorp.com
    Cc: dwain@saskndp.ca, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
    Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com, jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com,
    "jacques.nasser"<jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com>, occupyfredericton
    <occupyfredericton@gmail.com>, "9.17occupywallstreet"
    <9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.com>, occupyottawa
    <occupyottawa@gmail.com>

    http://www.operationmaple.com/home/173-saskatchewan-ndp-faces-electoral-disaster

    http://www.arts.uregina.ca/john-conway

    I don't believe John Conway knows as much as he thinks he does so he
    deserved to be somewhat more enlightened EH Brad Wall? Rest assured
    that I called him and told him as much as he wanted to know while
    Lingenfelter's campain manager played as dumb as a post about my
    concerns.

    However as dumb as Lingenfelter and his cohorts may pretend to be if
    the NDP boss in SK truly practiced old style, right wing “take no
    prisoners” politicking he who have embarassed the hell out of Brad
    Wall last year with the letter from Jac Nasser to mean old me that is
    hereto attached.

    Anyone with two clues between their ears or even a dumb NDP dude would
    know that BHP Billiton's Marius Kloppers visiting Brad Wall during an
    election campaign is just no coincidence at all. Something smells
    truly rotten indeed. However the only way to resolve my concerns is
    byway of litigation CORRECT MR WALL?

    http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/business/breakingnews/bhp-billiton-ceo-meets-with-saskatchewan-premier-during-election-campaign-131894618.html

    Have your lawyers review the emials below and tell your Attorney
    General to find the documents I sent his office byway REGISTERED US
    MAIL in 2005 and tell them to give me a call if they have more BALLS
    than you EH MR WALL?

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos
    902 800 0369


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
    Subject: Fw: RE BHP's game I just called Bill Boyd and the NDP In SK
    they played dumb as usual
    To: bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, dlingenfelter@mla.legassembly.sk.ca,
    bboyd@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, pr@potashcorp.com,
    Podwika@potashcorp.com, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
    corporate.relations@potashcorp.com
    Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com


    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Subject: Yo Shawny Baby interestng trick your pal Carl Urquhart and
    his buddies in the RCMP and Fat Fred City's Finest tried to pull on my
    son and I last night EH?
    To: "MLA"<MLA@carlurquhart.com>, "kelly. lamrock"
    <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, "jack. keir"<jack.keir@gnb.ca>,
    "jack.macdougall"<jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca
    >, "Ed. Doherty"
    <Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca>, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"<wally.stiles@gnb.ca>,
    "oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "danfour"
    <danfour@myginch.com>, "Richard Harris"
    <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, "tracy"<tracy@jatam.org>, "nb.
    premier"<nb.premier@gmail.com>, "nbpolitico"<nbpolitico@gmail.com>,
    "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>
    Cc: "Wayne.Lang"<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rob.lafrance"
    <rob.lafrance@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "shawn. graham"<shawn.graham@gnb.ca>,
    "John. Foran"<John.Foran@gnb.ca>, "john"
    <john@johncampbellsaintjohnharbour.ca>, "krisaustin"
    <krisaustin@panb.org>, "robin reid"<zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, "tony"
    <tony@peoplestandup.ca>, fortsaskatchewan.vegreville@assembly.ab.ca,
    "Barry.MacKnight"<Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, "Barry Winters"
    <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
    Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 6:25 PM

    How dumb was that? I must ask did he expect the cops to arrest both of
    us and then call us both crazy? Hell Urquhart even bragged in front of
    the cops that he did the same shit on July 4th, 2008 That malicious
    nonsense didn't work out too well for the long gone lawyer and former
    Minister of Health Mikey Murphy partcularly after the nasty French
    bastard Chucky Lebanc and hs pals violated my privacy and blogged
    about N'esy Pas? I told the cops last nght to simply Google my name and
    the dumb bastards laughed.

    FYI type in Davd Amos to see that I wa not jokng with the smiling dumb
    bastards last nght Google will offer Chucky Leblanc's bullshit about
    mean old me at the top of the hit  list DUHHH?

    Davd Amos plus Google equals

    http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html

    Do tell does Carl Baby really think I won't sue his nasty arse
    someday? Ya think the corrupt ex cop of Fat Fred City's Finest would
    at least wait until he and his cohorts got sworn in to take over your
    jobs EH?

    --- On Mon, 9/13/10, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:


    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Subject: How is your conscience and sense of ethical conduct doing now
    ladies?
    To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com, Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com
    Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"<william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    "Dean.Buzza"<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 7:57 PM


    Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
    Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
    July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
    Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
    Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
    held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
    Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
    previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
    including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
    and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
    working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
    Chartered Secretaries.

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)"<Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com>
    Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
    Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
    To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com


    Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
    Billiton

    Susan Collins
    Company Secretariat
    BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
    T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
    E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.com<mailto:jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com>

    <<Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf>>


    -----Original Message-----
    From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
    To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
    fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp.com;
    lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
    krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
    tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com; nmiller@corridor.ca;
    bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
    nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
    potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com;
    rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
    mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
    Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
    Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
    WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
    Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
    of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
    you people buy much stock in their stock eh?

    With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
    issues again about  theexploitation of our natural resources to a
    bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
    attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
    McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
    did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
    conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
    Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
    now)

    Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
    with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
    sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
    simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
    have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos


    This message and any attached files may contain information that is
    confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
    by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
    the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
    recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
    that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
    is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
    therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
    sender immediately and delete the message.



    http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=821

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash-corp-soars-bhp-bid-rejected/article1675353/

    http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00828/BHPrelease_828561a.pdf

    http://www.potashcorp.com/media/POT_2010_Letter_from_BHP_Billiton's_Chairman.pdf

    http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/aboutUs/companyOverview/ourBoard.jsp

    http://www.potashcorp.com/about/management_board/senior_management/podwika/

    http://www.corridor.ca/media/2010-press-releases/20100510.html

    http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=712&name=foster&pg=&office=

    http://www.robmooremp.com/081908.htm

    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009/05/07/nb-penobsquis-water-lawyer-1056.html?ref=rss

    http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.ca/2010/03/risk-and-reward-when-rural-life-meets-economic-development/5666

    http://www.vancouverislandwaterwatchcoalition.ca/go456a/FRACKING

    http://www.elements.nb.ca/theme/ecojustice/JeanPaul/JeanPaul.htm

    http://www.nbmediacoop.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1133:penobsquis-residents-seek-compensation-for-damages&catid=82:environment&Itemid=197



    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Subject: Yo Mr Harper What part of this email did the many Green
    Meanies fail to understand last year?
    To: "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "davidc.coon"<davidc.coon@gmail.com>,
    leader@greenparty.ca, "campaign"<campaign@briantopp.ca>,
    "Nycole.Turmel"<Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
    <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
    >, "briangallant10"
    <briangallant10@gmail.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
    <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "gregory.graham"
    <gregory.graham@tidescanada.org>, "ross"<ross@tidescanada.org>,
    "ross.mcmillan"<ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org
    >,
    info@blackriver.ns.ca, "maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
    darce@nsrighttoknow.ca, timb@thecoast.ca, "counsel"
    <counsel@barackobama.com>, "newt"<newt@newt.org>, "info"
    <info@mittromney.com>
    Cc: jb@sierraclub.ca, "premier@gov.ns.ca"<premier@gov.ns.ca>,
    "premier.ministre"<premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.ca>,
    "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX"<premier@gov.bc.ca>, "premier"
    <premier@gnb.ca>
    Date: Friday, January 27, 2012, 8:46 AM


    You and lawyers such as Joey Oliver, Gary Lunn and Dizzy Lizzy May are
    well aware of why I have "Issues" with the Greasy Gassy Oily Guys, the
    National Energy Board and all the Green Meanies EH?

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:26:17 -0300
    Subject: I just called
    To: timb@thecoast.ca
    Cc: info@greenbelt.ca, taxworthy@gordonfn.org, tim@gordonfn.org,
    tbrodhead@mcconnellfoundation.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Lisa Gue <lgue@davidsuzuki.org>
    Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:37:02 -0400
    Subject: RE: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me
    back Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Cc: Jean-Patrick Toussaint <jptoussaint@davidsuzuki.org>, Sutton Eaves
    <seaves@davidsuzuki.org>, Ian Bruce <ibruce@davidsuzuki.org>

    Mr. Amos,

    When you called my cell phone earlier, as I was on my way into a
    meeting, you offered to send me an e-mail outline the information you
    are looking for from the David Suzuki Foundation. Is this it??

    Lisa Gue

    From: Sutton Eaves <seaves@davidsuzuki.org>
    Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: The greedy pople on the Fake Left
    say nasty things about mean old me as well EH Stevey Boy Harper?
    To: "David Amos"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:55 PM


    Thanks for your message. I am out of the office until Tuesday, April 19.

    If this is a media request, please contact Ian Hanington at
    ihanington@davidsuzuki.org, or Leanne Clare at lclare@davidsuzuki.org.

    Otherwise, I'll return your message when I return.

    Have a great day!


    From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Subject: The greedy pople on the Fake Left say nasty things about mean
    old me as well EH Stevey Boy Harper?
    To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy@jatam.org,
    dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca,
    nmiller@corridor.ca, coalitionstlaurent@me.com,
    jeanpatrick.toussaint@adelaide.edu.au, info@climateprojectcanada.org,
    lgue@davidsuzuki.org, ibruce@davidsuzuki.org, seaves@davidsuzuki.org,
    "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "IgnatM"<IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, "danfour"
    <danfour@myginch.com>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
    <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "charlieparkermla"
    <charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca>, "ducepg"<ducepg@parl.gc.ca>,
    "LaytoJ"<LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, leader@greenparty.ca
    Cc: "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>, ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca
    Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:54 PM


    From: John Bennett <jb@sierraclub.ca>
    Subject: Re: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me
    back Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
    To: "Paula Boutis"<pboutis@ilercampbell.com>,
    "JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com"<JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com>, "Wayne
    Gallant"<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "webo@xplornet.com"
    <webo@xplornet.com>, "Gretchen Fitzgerald"<gretchenf@sierraclub.ca>,
    "maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Cc: "pfalvo@yellowknife.ca"<pfalvo@yellowknife.ca>
    Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:26 PM


    He is known to Gretchen as not quiet rational.

    John Bennett Executive Director Sierra Club Canada 613 291 6888

    -----Original Message-----
    From: "Paula  Boutis"<pboutis@ilercampbell.com>
    Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:18:46
    To: JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com<JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com>; Wayne
    Gallant<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
    webo@xplornet.com<webo@xplornet.com>;
    jb@sierraclub.ca<jb@sierraclub.ca>;
    gretchenf@sierraclub.ca<gretchenf@sierraclub.ca>;
    maritime_malaise<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
    Cc: pfalvo@yellowknife.ca<pfalvo@yellowknife.ca>
    Subject: RE: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me back
    Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?

    I am not responding to Dave Amos' emails, but I believe I have heard
    he has some "issues".  I have no sense of what his involvement is with
    the organization or why he is threatening law suits (my receptionist
    just intercepted a call and he told her he didn't want to leave a
    message and to just tell her that he would "see me in court").

    Does anyone have any idea what to do about this guy?   Should we just
    ignore him?

    Paula

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:01:31 -0300
    Subject: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me back
    Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
    To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy@jatam.org,
    dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca,
    nmiller@corridor.ca, coalitionstlaurent@me.com,
    jeanpatrick.toussaint@adelaide.edu.au, info@climateprojectcanada.org,
    lgue@davidsuzuki.org, ibruce@davidsuzuki.org, seaves@davidsuzuki.org,
    pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>
    Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
    "oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour
    <danfour@myginch.com>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
    <bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, charlieparkermla
    <charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca>, ducepg <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>,
    LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, leader@greenparty.ca

    http://www.coalitionsaintlaurent.ca/en/contact

    Jean-Patrick Toussaint
    Spokesperson (english), St-Lawrence Coalition
    (David Suzuki Foundation)
    514-316-4646

    http://www.davidsuzuki.org/fr/

    http://www.climateprojectcanada.org/.profile/jtoussaint3

    http://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/jeanpatrick.toussaint

    http://www.climateprojectcanada.org/about/board

    Did that lots of people have an opinion of bugets not just David
    Suzuki and the greasy gassy oily guys such as Emera, Corridor
    Resources and irving Oil

    http://www.davidsuzuki.org/media/

    Just Dave
    By Location  Visit Detail
    Visit 13,581
    Domain Name   videotron.ca ? (Canada)
    IP Address   69.70.160.# (Videotron Ltee)
    ISP   Videotron Ltee
    Location   Continent  :  North America
    Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
    State/Region  :  Quebec
    City  :  Boucherville
    Lat/Long  :  45.6, -73.45 (Map)
    Language   English (U.S.) en-us
    Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
    Browser   Firefox
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8)
    Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)
    Javascript   version 1.5
    Monitor   Resolution  :  1680 x 1050
    Color Depth  :  24 bits
    Time of Visit   Apr 6 2011 2:01:04 pm
    Last Page View   Apr 6 2011 2:01:04 pm
    Visit Length   0 seconds
    Page Views   1
    Referring URL  http://www.google.ca...
    0yufbeXCuJf0WH_kccBw
    Search Engine  google.ca
    Search Words  david amos corridor resources
    Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
    Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
    Out Click
    Time Zone   UTC-5:00
    Visitor's Time   Apr 6 2011 1:01:04 pm
    Visit Number   13,581



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:04:12 -0300
    Subject: FYI here is a litte Deju Vu from Saint John Harbour for Dr Ed
    to review EH Shawny Baby?
    To: john <john@johncampbellsaintjohnharbour.ca>,
    "carlkillen@gmail.com"<carlkillen@gmail.com>, "Ed. Doherty"
    <Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca>, sharon_christian@transcanada.com, Aaron Kennedy
    <sjmpabk@nb.sympatico.ca>, alison.gayton@unb.ca,
    Allison_denning@hc-sc.gc.ca, amcallis@nrcan.gc.ca,
    mcnan@reg2.health.nb.ca, info@irishhouseoftara.com,
    ohallowe@gov.ns.ca, caring@rogers.com, cstpierre@nbpower.com, "Charles
    L. Debly"<charlesdebly56@yahoo.com>, dannyrobichaud@nb.aibn.com,
    deg@nb.aibn.com, darrell@unbi.org, dawnc@nbnet.nb.ca,
    ddavies@mccarthy.ca, "Dorothy C. Dawson"<lawbrodc@hotmail.com>,
    erik.denis@gnb.ca, FollowFran@yahoo.ca, fjames@gmail.com,
    wattadil@nbnet.nb.ca, gnemecr@repsolypf.com, macgriff@nbnet.nb.ca,
    saurtwo@nb.sympatico.ca, ileadley@duke-energy.com,
    horse97@nb.sympatico.ca, Jake.Harms@justice.gc.ca, jsmellie@osler.com,
    pearcer@nbnet.nb.ca, joel_forrest@transcanada.com,
    pappas.john@jdirving.com, smithl@bennettjones.ca,
    len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com, lratelle@gazmetro.com,
    Brunswick.Pipeline@ec.gc.ca, mbrown@heritagegas.com,
    mosher.mark@jdirving.com, matthew_wharton@transcanada.com,
    burgess@nbnet.nb.ca, christiemike@rogers.com,
    Muratte.Graves@irvingoil.com, murray99@nbnet.nb.ca,
    gretenern@bennettjones.ca, nmiller@corridor.ns.ca,
    longsure@nbnet.nb.ca, peggyjames@rogers.com, Paul.Vanderlaan@gnb.ca,
    zedpl@parl.gc.ca, pthompson@blgcanada.com, Pcblaney@rogers.com,
    rjpelletier@duke-energy.com, rene.gallant@nspower.ca,
    richard.neufeld@fmc-law.com, Rinde.Powell@encana.com,
    fairbairn@capp.ca, Robert.Gall@shell.com, robmoirndp@gmail.com,
    ronald.moore@esso.ca, ron@unitedway.aibn.nb.com,
    shelley.black@enbridge.com, mcgratst@gov.ns.ca,
    sweilcox@nb.sympatico.ca, curriet@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca,
    ted_semadeni@anadarko.com, tdalgleish@mccarthy.ca,
    edterry@nbnet.nb.ca, tinkpen@gmail.com, William.Gould@gnb.ca
    Cc: "kelly. lamrock"<kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, "shawn. graham"
    <shawn.graham@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
    danfour <danfour@myginch.com>, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>,
    "tomp. young"<tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com>, tony
    <tony@peoplestandup.ca>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:59:59 -0300
    Subject: I called you all and tried to explain how I can help with
    your concerns I repeat just say my name
    To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy
    <tracy@jatam.org>, dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca
    Cc: nmiller <nmiller@corridor.ca>, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"
    <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>

    If nothing else listen to this and get pissed off lIke mean old me. At
    least that emotion is honest.

    http://www.archive.org/details/Corridor1

    Veritas Vincit
    David Raymond Amos



    http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/in-the-news

    http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/en/media/release/coalition-calls-leaders-act-immediately-stop-oil-and-gas-exploration-gulf-st-lawrence

    COALITION CALLS ON LEADERS TO ACT IMMEDIATELY TO STOP OIL AND GAS
    EXPLORATION IN GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE
    For Immediate Release - October 4, 2010
    PICTOU, NS – Today’s decision by the Canada Newfoundland and Labrador
    Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB) to allow seismic blasting in the
    Gulf of St. Lawrence was met with shock and concern by a coalition
    calling for a moratorium on oil and gas development in the Gulf of St.
    Lawrence. The coalition - made of aboriginal, fishing, and
    environmental organizations - is calling on municipal, provincial,
    federal, and aboriginal leaders to act swiftly to halt the testing.

    “With this decision, the CNLOPB has approved an activity that could
    damage this entire precious ecosystem,” according to Mary Gorman of
    the Save Our Seas and Shores, “We want this decision reversed
    immediately, and action taken to allow jurisdictions bordering on the
    Gulf to have a say in its future.”

    “Seismic testing could start in the next 48 hours, potentially
    damaging marine mammals like blue whales, and disrupting fish and
    fisheries. This approval has given oil and gas as a toehold in the
    Gulf that could lead to full scale drilling,” according to Danielle
    Giroux of the. “Fishermen I work for need more say over protecting the
    Gulf. We want the CNLOPB’s decision reversed immediately.”

    “An oil spill in the Gulf of St. Lawrence would impact fish stocks and
    coastal communities in Quebec, PEI, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and
    Newfoundland. Moreover, the national importance of this ecosystem must
    be upheld.”  says Gretchen Fitzgerald, of the Sierra Club Canada. “
    Federal laws to protect endangered species and fish habitat recognize
    the importance of protecting our shared biodiversity and resources.
    This decision is not reflecting this shared responsibility or concerns
    expressed by groups around the Gulf.”

    -30-



    For more information, please contact:

    Mary Gorman, Save our Seas and Shores, 902-926-2128/mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca

    Danielle Giroux (Francais), Attention Fragile (Magdalen Islands)
    418-969-9440/dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca

    Gretchen Fitzgerald, Director, Sierra Club Atlantic, 902-444-3113/
    gretchenf@sierraclub.ca

    Mark Butler, Policy Director, Ecology Action Centre,
    902-429-5287/action@ecologyaction.ca

    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    Subject: Say Hoka Hey to the very sneaky lawyer Dizzy Lizzy May for me will
    ya?
    To: JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com, "Wayne.Gallant"
    <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , webo@xplornet.com,
    board@sierraclub.ca, jb@sierraclub.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca,
    maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
    Cc: pfalvo@yellowknife.ca, pboutis@ilercampbell.com, leader@greenparty.ca
    Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:28 PM


    http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/john-bennet-bio

    Bennett was assisting Cape Bretoners opposing a coal-fired power plant
    at Point Aconi in Nova Scotia when he first caught the attention
    Elizabeth May, then Sierra Club Canada’s executive-director. May liked
    his approach – among other things, he’d brought his wife and two
    daughters to a potluck supper meeting and assured the group he was
    there to hear from them, not issue orders. Several years – and, after
    an interview on a train ride from Toronto to Ottawa -- later, she
    hired him as the Club’s director of atmosphere and energy.

    He managed environmental education campaigns; was the Club’s main
    spokesperson on air, energy, automotive and climate change issues;
    prepared fundraising proposals; and wrote position papers and research
    articles.

    During this period, Bennett also headed the Climate Action Network, an
    association of up to 100 environmental, health, labour and faith
    organizations from 10 provinces and two territories. There, he was
    also the chief spokesperson, wrote releases and papers, and acted as
    liaison with government officials, ministers, MPs, their staffs and
    industry leaders. He did similar work with a successor organization,
    ClimateforChange.ca.

    It was then that he was involved in preparing reporters for the
    federal Conservative government’s climate plan. “I figured we had to
    talk to the media. We had to meet the government head-on, and say what
    they were doing was going backward. We were very effective.”

    The work “succeeded to the extent that when Stéphane Dion became
    Liberal leader, the party thought the climate and environment were
    where they should campaign. They were right; they just did it very
    badly.”

    A spirit of collaboration

    Most recently, Bennett was communications director for the Green Party
    of Canada, including the 2008 campaign in which the Greens, led by
    May, won nearly a million votes and was the only party to increase its
    total.

    “It’s a well-rounded background, ranging from activist events to
    negotiating in the halls of power,” Bennett says. “My knowledge covers
    the spectrum of issues across the country.”

    Bennett’s experience has demonstrated the importance of collaborating
    with other groups and including as many people as possible, and their
    ideas, in whatever work must be done. That was especially obvious in
    the creation of the Green Budget Coalition, which analyzed federal
    budgets in terms of their impact on environmental concerns.


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: David Amos
    To: Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
    letters@proislam.com ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Canada@cair-net.org ;
    dcr618@msn.com ; madd_professor@cox.net ; Iolmisha@cs.com ;
    derrickcrobinson@gmail.com ; khr909@hotmail.com ; erniemusic2@yahoo.com ;
    kevin_annett@hotmail.com ; radical@radicalpress.com ; thespur@hotmail.com ;
    lisah@whooshnet.com ; dougchristie@shaw.ca ; lawald@web.net ;
    wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; info@afi-international.com ;
    wgoss@smss.com ; landrews@smss.com ; jcrosbie@coxandpalmer.com ;
    rgfaloon@coxandpalmer.com ; dhashey@coxandpalmer.com ; smay@coxandpalmer.com
    ; kmccullogh@smss.com ; gpetrie@smss.com ; orakwa@paulcomm.ca ;
    Kahentinetha2@yahoo.com ; katenies20@yahoo.com ; media@cupw-sttp.org
    Cc: ceri@shaw.ca ; deanr0032@hotmail.com ; info@politicswatch.com ;
    Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca ; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca ; Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca ;
    McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca ; Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
    Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Holland.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ;
    Martin.Pat@parl.gc.ca ; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ;
    Turner.G@parl.gc.ca ; Chong.M@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ;
    warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; John.Foran@gnb.ca
    Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 3:15 PM
    Subject: RE;Budget votes and more War its the same old same old If you
    forgot scroll down


    I just talked to Paul Dewar's office for the last time.and spoke to Jamesey
    Baby once again. He to me to go for it and sue the Crown I told him I willl
    also sue him and his chickenshit boss too or my name ain't "Just Dave".
    reveiw his Bullshit and start lining up lawyers.

    "Katter, Robert (MP)"<Bob.Katter.MP@aph.gov.au> wrote:

    Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach
    George W. Bush and put a stop Harper's motion tommorrow
    Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 02:18:35 +1000
    From: "Katter, Robert \(MP\)"<Bob.Katter.MP@aph.gov.au>
    To: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

    Thank you for your e-mail which will be forwarded to the appropriate staff
    member to deal with as soon as possible.
    The Kennedy electorate is a large electorate (about 2.5 times the size of
    the entire State of Victoria) with almost 150,000 residents, over 120
    schools and over 140 localities all with various service and sporting clubs.
    For this reason we receive quite a large volume of faxes, letters, e-mails
    and phone calls each day and while our staff aim for a 7-day turnaround in
    correspondence - unfortunately this is not always possible.  However, if you
    have not heard back from anyone at the office within 7-14 days, please
    telephone the office on the numbers listed below.
    If the matter is urgent please phone 1800 810 519, or if you are not in the
    electorate, 07 4061 6066.
    To save disappointment we should advise that correspondence from outside the
    electorate is not given the priority that correspondence within the
    electorate is given.
    That said, many thanks for your message, and we will endeavour to get back
    to you as soon as possible.
    Hon Bob Katter MP
    Member for Kennedy
    Innisfail Office:  Cnr Edith & Owen Sts PO Box 1638 Innisfail FNQ 4860 Ph 07
    4061 6066 Fx 07 4061 6566
    Mt Isa Office:  52 Miles St Mt Isa NWQ 4825 PO Box 2130 Mt Isa NWQ 4825 Ph
    07 4743 3534 Fx 07 4743 0189
    Parliament House (Sitting weeks only) Ph 02 6277 4978  Fx 02 6277 8558
    Toll Free Number: 1800 810 519

    "Roy, Bruno (Patterson Palmer NB)"<broy@pattersonpalmer.ca> wrote:

    Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Stevey Boy Harper and Malicious Mikey
    Ignatieff ain't fishing on Brokeback Mountian EH? Here is why
    Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:52:58 -0300
    From: "Roy, Bruno \(Patterson Palmer NB\)"<broy@pattersonpalmer.ca>
    To: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

    I will be out of the office until May 23rd. Should you need any assistance,
    please call my assistant Doris at 856-9800.

    Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 mai. Si vous avez des questions, vous
    pouvez rejoindre mon adjointe Doris au 856-9800.



    "Dewar, Paul - M.P."<Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca> wrote:
      Subject: RE: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach George W. Bush and put a
    stop Harper's motion tommorrow
      Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:49:47 -0400
      From: "Dewar, Paul - M.P."<Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca>
      To: "David Amos"<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>


      Hi David. My name is James and I have been asked to send this message onto
    you from Paul…

      Dear Mr. Amos,

      Thank you for informing me of your concerns regarding Canada's role in
    Afghanistan after February 2007.

      The NDP voted against this motion because we believe it is the wrong
    mission for Canada. It does not reflect the peace-making values that
    Canadians want to see our forces undertake on the world stage. This forced
    motion essentially ties our aid and development funds to war-making, and we
    cannot support that.

      It is quite clear that Harper's Conservatives aren't interested in due
    diligence. They're interested in dragging us further into a US-style combat
    role and away from our traditional peace keeping role. Much like the
    Liberals before them, the Conservatives have failed to tell Canadians:

      - What the chain of command and control will be for this mission.
      - What the definition of success will be for our troops.
      - What our exit strategy will be.

      Many Canadians have written me wanting answers and it is our duty as
    representatives of our constituents, to get answers before committing to any
    new missions overseas. As any soldier knows, time spent on reconnaissance is
    never wasted.

      New Democrats recognize that Canada does have a role in assisting Afghanis
    in rebuilding their country. Afghanistan is the largest recipient of
    Canadian overseas development aid and we fully support the continuation of
    that funding - outside of this mission.

      Thank you again for the time and effort you have taken to share your
    thoughts with me, and for bringing your opinion on this matter to my
    attention.

      Sincerely,



      Paul Dewar, MP Ottawa Centre



    ------------------------------
    ------------------------------------------------
      From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
      Sent: May 16, 2006 8:13 PM
      To: Allen, Mike - M.P.; rcastrocalvo@yahoo.com; irislana@hotmail.com;
    Angus, Charlie - M.P.; Atamanenko, Alex - M.P.; Bell, Catherine - M.P.;
    Bevington, Dennis - M.P.; Black, Dawn - M.P.; Blaikie, Bill - M.P.;
    Charlton, Chris - M.P.; Chow, Olivia - M.P.; Christopherson, David - M.P.;
    Comartin, Joe - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen, Nathan - M.P.; Davies,
    Libby - M.P.; Dewar, Paul - M.P.; Julian, Peter - M.P.; Marston, Wayne -
    M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Martin, Tony - M.P.; Masse, Brian - M.P.;
    Mathyssen, Irene - M.P.; Nash, Peggy - M.P.; Priddy, Penny - M.P.; Savoie,
    Denise - M.P.; Siksay, Bill - M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy - M.P.; Emerson,
    David - M.P.
      Cc: Simms, Scott - M.P.; Russell, Todd - M.P.; Manning, Fabian - M.P.;
    Hearn, Loyola - M.P.; Doyle, Norman - M.P.; Byrne, Gerry - M.P.; McGuire,
    Joe - M.P.; MacAulay, Lawrence - M.P.; D'Amours, Jean-Claude - M.P.;
    Hubbard, Charles - M.P.; Murphy, Brian - M.P.; Thibault, Robert - M.P.;
    Savage, Michael - M.P.; Regan, Geoff - M.P.; Keddy, Gerald - M.P.; Eyking,
    Mark - M.P.; Cuzner, Rodger - M.P.; Brison, Scott - M.P.
      Subject: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach George W. Bush and put a
    stop Harper's motion tommorrow


      Hey
              Before all the Parliamentarians argue and then vote to support
    further Canadian deaths in one of George W. Bush's Wars for Global Control
    for the benefit of his corporate cohorts perhaps, you should at least listen
    to the attachments if you do not wish to bother to read what Billy Casey and
    the Bankers got on May 12th. If I can assist in preventing the demise of
    just one more Canadian warrior in a malicious foreign war, all of my work
    will have been worth it EH?
               If everyone ignores me as usual, I will not be surprised. At
    least I will sleep well with my conscience tonight because I know I have
    done my very best to stop the nonsense since early 2002 long before the War
    in Iraq began. None of you deserve to sleep well at all because you all
    supported Harper's orders to send our people to war even before the 39th
    Parliament sat this year. As far as I am concerned the blood of four very
    honourable soldiers can be found on your hands. Shame on all of you for not
    even bothering to honour our dead by lowering the flag on the Peacetower. As
    long as I have been aware and could consider myself a Proad Canadian, I
    thought we were peacekeepers rather than poorly paid hired guns for crooked
    corporations, corrupt politicians and their wicked Yankee bible pounding
    buddies.
                                                                Veritas Vincit
                                                                       David
    Raymond Amos


      FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006

      Senator Arlen Specter
      United States Senate
      Committee on the Judiciary
      224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
      Washington, DC 20510

      Dear Mr. Specter:

      I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man named,
    David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters raised in the
    attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI
    wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
    previously.

      Very truly yours,
      Barry A. Bachrach
      Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
      Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
      Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com


            Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
            From: "David Amos"<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
            Subject: Jumping Jimmy Flaherty's jump boots versus Crosbie's old
    mukluks in a liberal Senate
            To: Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov,
    duffy@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com,
    Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
    Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, Kandalaw@mindspring.com, kmdickson@comcast.net,
    trvl@hotmail.com, patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, fbinhct@leo.gov,
    oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca,
    EGreenspan@144king.com, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
    alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca,
    Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca, racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net,
    freeman.c@parl.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, graham.b@parl.gc.ca,
    arthur.a@parl.gc.ca
            CC: nwnews@cknw.com, davidamos@bsn1.net, BBACHRACH@bowditch.com,
    david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca,
    moore.r@parl.gc.ca, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, toews.v@parl.gc.ca,
    day.s@parl.gc.ca, casey.b@parl.gc.ca, mlevine@goodmans.ca, brae@goodmans.ca,
    steve.moate@utoronto.ca, sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com, rep@karenyarbrough.com,
    dc@thepen.us, paul.neuman@asm.ca.gov, info@afterdowningstreet.org,
    gearpigs@hotmail.com, alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca

       Deja Vu Anyone? Anyone?
      That's what John Crosbie wore in 1979, the last time a budget brought down
    a Canadian government in a minority-Parliament situation. It proved to be a
    bad omen, given that the Conservative government of the day foundered on
    Crosbie's document.
      The mukluks proved to be

     











    Moncton budget proposes cutting tax rate after assessments soar

    $
    0
    0

     

     ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 18:30:53 +0000
    Subject: RE: Methinks the CBC, the RCMP and YOU should start lining up
    lawyers EH Higgy???
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 15:29:05 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Methinks the CBC, the RCMP and YOU should start lining
    up lawyers EH Higgy???
    To: becky.holland@snb.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, "george.oram"<george.oram@gnb.ca>,
    Lucie.Dubois@gnb.ca, "John.Lunney"<John.Lunney@gnb.ca>,
    Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news
    <news@dailygleaner.com>, "martin.gaudet"
    <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
    <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
    david.coon@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
    "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>,
    "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "chuck.chiasson"
    <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, "charles.murray"<charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
    "Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Ross.Wetmore"
    <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
    "Cyril.Theriault"<Cyril.Theriault@gmail.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 01:44:45 -0400
    Subject: Methinks the CBC, the RCMP and YOU should start lining up
    lawyers EH Higgy???
    To: "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hugh.flemming"
    <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
    "barb.whitenect"<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "barbara.massey"
    <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
    <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
    <Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
    "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"
    <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
    <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>,
    "martin.gaudet"<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
    <Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
    david.coon@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
    "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>,
    "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "chuck.chiasson"
    <chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, "charles.murray"<charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
    "Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
    "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jake.stewart"
    <jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, "george.oram"
    <george.oram@gnb.ca>, Lucie.Dubois@gnb.ca, John.Lunney@gnb.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
    John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca, john@jardineauctioneers.com,
    blair@jardineauctioneers.com, John.green@gnb.ca

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 05:41:43 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: RE The CBC and RCMP A Telephone Conversation
    re: 1965 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle and New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes from
    5064544400
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

    Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
    that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
    understanding.

    If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
    visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144.

    Thank you.


    Bonjour,

    Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
    quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
    Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

    Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
    veuillez visiter
    www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

    Merci.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000
    Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
    E3B 5H1
    Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
    Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2020 05:40:31 +0000
    Subject: Automatic Reply
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
    Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

    Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
    note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
    that your message will be carefully reviewed.

    We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

    -------------------

    Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
    Justice et procureur général du Canada.

    En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
    prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
    votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
    avec soin.

    Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.

    On 11/25/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
    > JARDINE AUCTIONEERS INC.
    > 1849 Route 640, Hanwell Road
    > Fredericton NB E3C 2A7
    > CANADA
    > Phone: 506-454-4400 Fax: 506-450-3288
    > Toll Free: 1-877-499-4400
    >
    > John Jardine  john@jardineauctioneers.com
    > Blair Sissons blair@jardineauctioneers.com
    >
    >
    >     ----- Forwarded Message -----
    > From: magicJack <voicemail@magicjack.com>
    > To: DAVID AMOS
    > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020, 04:58:17 PM AST
    > Subject: New VM (1) - 0:04 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
    > 5064544400
    >  Dear magicJack User:
    >
    > You received a new 0:04 minutes voicemail message, on Tuesday,
    > November 24, 2020 at 03:58:15 PM in mailbox 9028000369 from
    > 5064544400.
    >
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-19-outbreak-coronavirus-pandemic-1.5813783
    >
    >
    > N.B. COVID-19 roundup: Some classes go online, testing sites boosted
    > after 5 new cases
    >
    > Dr. Jennifer Russell announces new cases in Saint John and Moncton regions
    > Marie Sutherland · CBC News · Posted: Nov 24, 2020 10:30 AM AT
    >
    >
    >  236 Comments
    >
    >
    > David Amos
    > Content disabled
    > Methinks Cardy knew the virus was in the Quispamsis school despite
    > what he claimed to Seguin this morning Everybody knows what happening
    > when the lips of a turncoat dude who consumes too many of little Lou's
    > butter tarts are moving N'esy Pas?
    >
    > Lou Bell
    > Content disabled
    > Reply to @David Amos: What did he claim " this morning " ? What would
    > you have preferred , he blab it for all the " conspiracy theorists "
    > to spin ???
    >
    > Lou Bell
    > Content disabled
    > Reply to @David Amos: Did you ever get your tricycle back ?
    >
    > Lou Bell
    > Reply to @Lou Bell: Spin , like Dave and the " Me Party " ??
    >
    > DeanRoger Ray
    > Reply to @Lou Bell: It was auctioned off at least ten years ago (minus
    > about a dozen Memorex cassettes...)
    >
    > David Amos
    > Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Pure D BS
    >
    > DeanRoger Ray
    > Reply to @David Amos: You wish
    >
    > Rob Sense
    > Reply to @DeanRoger Ray:
    > The wheels came off long ago.
    >
    > DeanRoger Ray
    > Reply to @David Amos: In fact it was done through the Jardines.
    >
    > David Amos
    > Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: I just called Jardines and they denied
    > selling my Harley
    >
    > David Amos
    > Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: trust that the RCMP are well aware that your
    > buddies Bell and Cardy both live near Jardines and the crook who still
    > has my bike
    >
    > Ray Oliver
    > Reply to @David Amos: You didn't hear the laughter in the background?
    >
    > David Amos
    > Reply to @Ray Oliver: I heard worse than mere laughter
    >
    > DeanRoger Ray
    > Reply to @David Amos: “I’m David Raymond Amos and I have the world
    > record for suing lawyers. Mehears you sold my Harley. True or False?”
    >
    > Ray Oliver
    > Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: You forgot "the only time I've ever stood in
    > a court of law was as Defendant never the Plaintiff".. but I do throw
    > meritless lawsuits at educated lawyers that get laughed out of the
    > room as often as possible"
    >
    >
    >
    > http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/06/for-public-record-when-i-hears-and-read.html
    >
    >
    > Thursday, 22 June 2017
    >
    > For the Public Record when I heard and read the news about the RCMP
    > today I felt compelled to rewrite a brief that I am ordered to file in
    > the Federal Court of Appeal tomorrow
    >
    >
    > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnLsExAsWN0
    >
    > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjonbmIti-o&list=UU_xApcTENOws8eIxoNNWPFQ
    >
    > From: "MacKenzie, Lloyd (SNB)"lloyd.mackenzie@snb.ca
    > Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:01:27 -0400
    > Subject: Telephone Conversation re: 1965 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
    > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    > Cc: "Bastarache, Donald J.(SNB)"Donald.Bastarache@snb.ca,
    > "Morrison, Bill (SNB)"bill.morrison@snb.ca,
    > "Levesque-Finn, Sylvie(SNB)"Sylvie.Levesque-Finn@snb.ca, "Pleadwell, Derek
    > (SNB)"Derek.Pleadwell@snb.ca
    >
    > Mr. Amos:
    > Upon your request I will inform Mr. Derek Pleadwell[(506)
    > 444-2897], Chairperson SNB Board of Directors, of our extended
    > conversation regarding the issues surrounding the 1965 Harley-Davidson
    > motorcycle when he visits my office at approximately 3:30 P.M. today.
    >
    > Also, as requested, I've copied in Ms. Sylvie Levesque-Finn[ (506)
    > 453-3879 ],SNB President.
    >
    > Lloyd D. MacKenzie, AACI, P. App, CAE
    > Regional Manager of Assessment - Beauséjour Region/Responsable
    > régional de l'évaluation - region Beauséjour
    > Assessment/ de l'évaluation
    > Service New Brunswick/ Service Nouveau-Brunswick
    > 633 rue Main St.
    > 4th floor/4ième étage
    > Moncton, NB E1C 8R3
    > Tel/Tél: (506) 856-3910
    > Fax/Téléc: (506) 856-2519
    >

     

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-council-budget-2022-tax-rate-1.6235611

     

    Moncton budget proposes cutting tax rate after assessments soar

    City staff outline 2022 budget forecasts $176 million on operations, and $108 million on capital projects

    The tax rate would be reduced by more than 10 cents from $1.6497 per $100 of assessed value to $1.5472 if the budget is approved by city council. It's the first tax rate change since 2016. 

    The assessed value of properties in the city, determined by the province, rose 10.89 per cent, leading council to recommend a tax rate cut. 

    The budget indicates a one cent change in the tax rate translates to a reduced tax bill of $22.50 for a home valued at $225,000, and $35 for a $350,000 home. The rate change would affect all types of properties, not just homes.

    City staff outlined the proposed 2022 operating and capital budgets during a committee meeting Wednesday. 

    The budget forecasts spending $176 million on operations, and $108 million on capital projects like roads, water and sewer systems and on municipal buildings.

    Councillors question grant spending

    Spending on grants drew the first suggestions to change the budget. The city forecasts spending $7.6 million on grants to community non-profits.

    Multiple councillors voiced support for increasing the $25,000 grant to Ensemble, which had sought $51,000 next year. Ensemble presented to council its plans for an overdose prevention site earlier in the week.

    "We need to support them as much as we can," Coun. Paulette Theriault said of non-profits that care for vulnerable people. Coun. Bryan Butler moved a motion to increase the funding to the amount Ensemble had requested.

    Jacques Doucet, the city's chief financial officer, told councillors they may be able to find room in the budget, but it could also require changes to the tax rate. The request to increase that grant will be considered later this week. 

         A security vehicle leaves the House of Nazareth homeless shelter parking lot earlier this year. The shelter on Albert Street is the largest in the city. (Shane Magee/CBC)

    Others questioned city grants for the House of Nazareth homeless shelter. Councillors have heard from residents and businesses in the area affected by increased drug use and crime related to those using the shelter. 

    When the shelter relocated to a larger building on Albert Street, the organization claimed it would offer mental health and other support services in-house but that didn't happen. 

    Coun. Marty Kingston asked if they're working to add those services.

    Jocelyn Cohoon, the city's director of recreation, said the city is trying to confirm if that's going to happen.

    The city has budgeted to provide the shelter with $25,000 grants for three years. Cohoon said some of the grant money the organization requested will be put in a reserve until the city knows what the group plans to do. 

    Mayor Dawn Arnold said she liked that approach. 

    "We need a bit of leverage there," Arnold said. She said the "elephant in the room" continues to be mental health services under the province's jurisdiction. 

    "We have to advocate long and hard to our province on that one," Arnold said. 

    The budget doesn't include any of the requested $3 million by the Humanity Project recently. City staff indicated that they are still analyzing the request and will bring a report to council in the future. 

    Overall, staff wages, benefits and overtime make up a significant portion of the operations budget at $59 million. The budget shows 693 full-time city staff, down from 697 this year. 

    The city's share of the Codiac Regional Policing Authority budget, which covers 70 per cent of the Codiac Regional RCMP budget, at $27.7 million. That's up from $23.4 million last year.

    The budget has climbed in part because of a new collective agreement that included salary increases for the Mounties. 

     
     
     
     
     

    Southern N.B. cities propose property tax cuts for 2022

    Homeowner tax bills and municipal revenues will still increase because of higher property values

    The overall provincial tax base grew by 7.7 per cent this year, according to Service New Brunswick - or $5.2 billion - due to new construction and real estate sales.

    It means a windfall for some municipalities, which are now in the midst of their annual budget deliberations.

    In Moncton, assessed property values have increased by 10.89 per cent, according to municipal budget documents posted online. And the city is looking at reducing the property tax rate by 10.25 cents to $1.5472 per $100 of assessed value.

    In Saint John, an online budget proposal shows assessed value up by 6.2 per cent and the finance committee proposing a 7.5 cent reduction in the tax rate, which would take it to $1.71 per $100.

    In Fredericton, assessed property values are up by an average of 9.2 per cent. And this week city councillors voted to cut the property tax rate by 2.25 cents to $1.4086 per $100.

    The consensus on council was that 2.25 cents was "fair," said Henri Mallet, chair of Fredericton's municipal finance and corporate administration committee.

    Henri Mallet, Ward 12 councillor in Fredericton, and chair of the city's finance committee says a 2.25 cent cut is a "happy medium." The average homeowner will be paying more than $300 more on their tax bill. (City of Fredericton)

    It will allow the city to "address some needs" and "give back to citizens," Mallet said.

    Despite the rate cut, Fredericton homeowners will see their tax bill increase by hundreds of dollars.

    Average house assessments in the city have risen to $252,464, said Mallet. That means an average tax bill will increase by $348 to $3,556.21.

    City revenues, in turn, are expected to increase by about $8 million, he said.

    Spending will increase on renewing infrastructure, such as roads and pipes.

    "The longer that we push those down the road the cost gets higher and higher," Mallet said.

    The extra money will also help cover increasing costs, he said, such as solid waste tipping fees, insurance premiums and other bills that need to be paid.

    The planning department will get an additional staff member to help with big projects like reviewing the heritage bylaw and developing a plan for the city core.

    Building services will gain a new "environmental" staff position, said Mallet, to help ensure facilities are as energy efficient as possible.

    An extra sidewalk plow operator will be hired.

    A sidewalk ice-breaker project will be piloted.

    And side streets, known as "Priority 3", will get some salting in winter.

    Fredericton city councillors met Monday to iron out details of the city's upcoming budget. What will their decisions mean to your tax bills? Jeanne Armstrong talks to councillor Henri Mallet. 10:16

    The city is foregoing an extra $2 million it would have collected, had it not cut the property tax rate.

    In that scenario, average tax bills would have been almost $60 higher at $3.613.01.

    Some councillors had suggested that extra money could be spent on things like housing, environmental initiatives, and trail safety, said Mallet.

    They also debated an even bigger cut to the tax rate — four cents per $100 of assessment — but that was voted down, he said.

    "We also need to balance our budget."

    It's a much different financial position than the councillor has ever seen in his time at City Hall.

    "For the last five years the budget was really thin," he said.

    Capital spending had to be cut in order to maintain services, said Mallet, after assessments were frozen in 2018, and revenues fell last year due to the pandemic.

    The full city budget is scheduled to be voted on Nov. 22.

    Other cities

    Budget deliberations in Moncton are taking place this week.

    If all goes well, said city spokesperson Isabelle LeBlanc, the budget may be ratified Friday. 

    Dieppe had the highest tax base growth in the province at 12.75 per cent. 

    Its budget will be presented Nov. 15.

    It's a different situation in northern New Brunswick, where tax bases have also grown, but by smaller margins.

    The City of Campbellton will release its budget information on Nov. 15 as well, said Mayor Ian Comeau.

    Tax base growth in that city has been 2.99 per cent, he said.

    "Maintaining our tax rate would be ideal for us at this time," said Comeau.

    Edmundston is "not in the same boat as Fredericton, Moncton or Saint John in regards to increased assessed values," said spokesperson Mychèle Poitras.

    Its budget is scheduled to be adopted Nov. 9.

    In Miramichi, the tax base has increased by 4.42 per cent, but a tax cut has not been proposed, said treasurer Nancy Gorman.

    The final budget is expected to be presented Nov. 9.

    A budget presentation and approval meeting in Bathurst is planned for Nov. 15.

    According to the province, Bathurst's tax base grew by 5.84 per cent.

    With files from Information Morning Fredericton

     
     
     
     
    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:27:59 -0300
    Subject: I called everybody on the ballot in St. George before sending
    this email correct? Need I say shame on CBC again???
    To: faith.e.avery@gmail.com, detorakisjohn@gmail.com,
    sharontucker2018@gmail.com, bcba@rogers.com,
    lesliekarenarmstrong@gmail.com
    , bbacher31@gmail.com,
    gil.breau@gmail.com, coultonnm@hotmail.com, detorakis.a@gmail.com,
    hoop@nbnet.nb.ca, dararcleslie@gmail.com,
    macpherson_cynthia@yahoo.com, barbarayn22@gmail.com
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
    pierre.boudreau@moncton.ca, dawn.moncton@gmail.com,
    team@ginglesformayor.com, ybelliveaumoncton@gmail.com,
    krysta@krystaformoncton.com, isabellemoncton2021@gmail.com,
    martykingston3@gmail.com, leblanmo@gmail.com, splint@rogers.com,
    hafsah@ualberta.ca, realallainmoncton@gmail.com,
    shawncrossman@gmail.com, patrickrichardmoncton@gmail.com,
    danrossward1@gmail.com, BourgeoisMoncton2@gmail.com,
    Arognaunt4shewolf@hotmail.com, voteblairlawrence@gmail.com,
    charleslegermoncton2021@gmail.com, support@bettinamoores.ca,
    jeff4ward2@gmail.com, dianiblancoward3@gmail.com,
    bdbutler@nbnet.nb.ca, tamaranicholward3@gmail.com,
    davesteevesmoncton@gmail.com, susan.edgett@moncton.ca,
    brian.hicks@moncton.ca, paulette.theriault@moncton.ca,
    paul.pellerin@moncton.ca, paulrichardmoncton@gmail.com,
    info.council@moncton.ca, "len.hoyt"<len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>,
    Don.Darling@saintjohn.ca, Nathalie Sturgeon
    <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca,
    "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
    ,
    "Paul.Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
    <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/farmer-pleased-gold-mining-company-can-t-access-farm-without-permission-1.6047236

    Farmer pleased gold mining company can't access his land without permission

    John Detorakis's farm was part of a large mineral claim along the Bay
    of Fundy coast
    Shane Fowler · CBC News · Posted: Jun 01, 2021 7:30 AM AT

    16 Comments

    David Amos
    Methinks Higgy et al knows why the Mayor-elect and I should talk N'esy Pas?


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-mayor-arnold-campaign-donations-1.6047184

    Developers, Irvings and family helped fund Moncton's successful mayoral race

    List offers insight into into municipal campaign financing in province
    without limits or rules
    Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Jun 01, 2021 6:00 AM AT

    83 Comments Before I refeshed the page to see if CBC was up to their
    usual unethical trick Trust that I was nt surprised to see this

    David Amos
    Content deactivated
    Methinks Mayor Dawn Arnold read my latest email to her rather closely
    N'esy Pas?



    Methinks some politicians and media sheople should find these big
    talkers interesting EH??

    https://anchor.fm/nicholaspereira/episodes/MSM-Manipulation--Cult-Tactics-plus-my-answer-to-Jagmeet-Singh-and-the-Mayor-of-Belledune-e116cov

    MSM Manipulation & Cult Tactics plus my answer to Jagmeet Singh and
    the Mayor of Belledune
    The Nicholas Pereira Show • May 19

    More importantly folks in Belldune should check the comment section on
    June 5th ad study the rest this email closely N'esy Pas Higgy?

    NB Power pulls out of Maritime Iron project, company says

    NB Power has not offered any comment on cancelled project
    Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Jun 05, 2020 3:04 PM AT

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/belledune-smelter-village-council-maritime-iron-plant-1.5364373

    Stung by smelter closing, Belledune looks to $1B iron plant proposal

    Delegation of councillors heads to Fredericton to discuss Maritime Iron plant
    CBC News · Posted: Nov 19, 2019 6:30 AM AT

    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=479703262640596

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 12:22:21 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
    after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
    they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
    should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
    To: pierre.boudreau@moncton.ca, dawn.moncton@gmail.com,
    team@ginglesformayor.com, ybelliveaumoncton@gmail.com,
    krysta@krystaformoncton.com, isabellemoncton2021@gmail.com,
    martykingston3@gmail.com, leblanmo@gmail.com, splint@rogers.com,
    hafsah@ualberta.ca, realallainmoncton@gmail.com,
    shawncrossman@gmail.com, patrickrichardmoncton@gmail.com,
    danrossward1@gmail.com, BourgeoisMoncton2@gmail.com,
    Arognaunt4shewolf@hotmail.com, voteblairlawrence@gmail.com,
    charleslegermoncton2021@gmail.com, support@bettinamoores.ca,
    jeff4ward2@gmail.com, dianiblancoward3@gmail.com,
    bdbutler@nbnet.nb.ca, tamaranicholward3@gmail.com,
    davesteevesmoncton@gmail.com, susan.edgett@moncton.ca,
    brian.hicks@moncton.ca, paulette.theriault@moncton.ca,
    paul.pellerin@moncton.ca, paulrichardmoncton@gmail.com,
    info.council@moncton.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "len.hoyt"
    <len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com>, Don.Darling@saintjohn.ca, Nathalie
    Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-council-pierre-boudreau-conduct-1.5993457

    Moncton council won't sanction councillor for Facebook posts attacking activist

    Coun. Pierre Boudreau's apology accepted as sufficient
    Shane Magee · CBC News · Posted: Apr 19, 2021 6:59 PM AT


    Pierre A. Boudreau
    Councillor-at-Large

    506.866.8069
    pierre.boudreau@moncton.ca

    Pierre is serving his fifth term as a City Councillor-at-Large, after
    being re-elected in May 2016. He brings to his role on Council a
    background in law and a passion to grow an economically sustainable
    city.

    Retired from practising law in 2010, Pierre now devotes most of his
    time to Council work. He is known for meticulously researching before
    decision making on Council issues. Key areas of focus for him are
    sustainable economic growth and proper maintenance and upgrades to the
    City’s infrastructure assets.

    Pierre’s interest in politics came at an early age as he served as
    president of the student council at École Vanier. He went on to
    complete a Bachelor of Arts degree from the Université de Moncton in
    1972 and then a law degree from the University of New Brunswick in
    1975.

    Pierre and his high school sweetheart, Rita, married in 1973. They are
    the proud parents of two adult children and grandparents of Emilie and
    Cédrick Alexandre Boudreau. When he is not serving residents of
    Moncton, Pierre enjoys reading, cycling and photography.

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 14:10:55 -0300
    Subject: Re: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
    after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
    they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
    should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Cc: steve.roberge@gnb.ca, tj@burkelaw.ca, kelly@lamrockslaw.com,
    carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca,
    don.darling@saintjohn.ca, alan.roy@snb.ca, ckdrnews@radioabl.ca,
    news@931theborder.ca, news@959sunfm.com, contact@mcgmedia.net,
    smstevens@epla.net, info@gg.ca, brian.marlatt@pcparty.org,
    mehuenef@gmail.com, joe.hueglin@bellnet.ca, Joe.Hueglin@gmail.com,
    tmgarj@telusplanet.net, adamlordon@gmail.com, info@larrylynch.ca,
    peggy4mayor@gmail.com, clanthony@mta.ca, johnwforan@yahoo.ca,
    a.furlong9@gmail.com, tankert.geo@yahoo.com, kattie@nb.sympatico.ca,
    tonyrussell_518@hotmail.com, smithrd@nb.sympatico.ca,
    ryansomers@ymail.com, campbellmike229@gmail.com, sfedgett@gmail.com,
    roymacmullin2016@gmail.com, paulrichardmoncton@gmail.com,
    ASeamans@townofriverview.ca, CCassista@townofriverview.ca,
    mayor@moncton.ca, mayor.chorley@townofhampton.ca
    ,
    marc.thorne@sussex.ca, bachatt@nbnet.nb.ca, gclark@quispamsis.ca,
    kirstinherta@gmail.com, terryk12@nb.sympatico.ca, vop@nbnet.nb.ca,
    villra@nbnet.nb.ca, vnorton@nbnet.nb.ca,
    mflewwelling@sussexcorner.com, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
    serge.gauvin@snb.ca, wayne.gallant@nbpolice.ca,
    Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    Connell.smith@cbc.ca, premier@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
    leader@greenparty.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca,
    david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, robert.david.steele.vivas@gmail.com,
    jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com, jcomey@law.columbia.edu,
    Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, Robert.Jones@cbc.ca

    Deja Vu Anyone???

    On 1/7/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Trust that you will find this email at the bottom of this blog in a
    > hearbeat
    >
    >
    > https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/methinks-cbc-blaine-higgs-his-deputy.html
    >
    >
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/kennebecasis-police-chief-wayne-gallant-rcmp-1.4380826
    >
    > Ex-RCMP boss Wayne Gallant named new chief of Kennebecasis Regional Police
    > Force
    > Gallant, who was in charge of criminal operations for New Brunswick
    > RCMP, will replace retiring Steve Palmer
    > Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 02, 2017 9:53 AM AT
    >
    >
    > The Kennebecasis Regional Police Force has a new chief.
    >
    > Wayne Gallant, the former RCMP officer in charge of criminal
    > operations in New Brunswick, was announced Thursday as the new leader
    > of the force, which covers Rothesay and Quispamsis.
    >
    > Wayne Gallant, the former chief superintendent of the New Brunswick
    > RCMP, is taking over as chief of the Kennebecasis Regional Police
    > Force, effective Nov. 27. (Kennebecasis Regional Police Force)
    >
    > He will take over Nov. 27, according to a news release issued by the
    > Kennebecasis Regional Joint Board of Police Commissioners.
    >
    > "The board is pleased to have attracted a policing leader with such a
    > breadth of experience," chair Matt Alexander said in an emailed
    > statement to CBC News.
    >
    > "Wayne is a highly respected and decorated member of the policing
    > community and he will be a great asset to the Kennebecasis Valley,"
    > said Alexander, who is also the deputy mayor of Rothesay.
    >
    > Gallant will replace Chief Steve Palmer, who is scheduled to retire in
    > March, after he turns 60.
    >
    >     Kennebecasis police culture must change, chief says
    >     Kennebecasis officer under criminal investigation for alleged
    > sexual harassment
    >     Kennebecasis Regional Police Force seeks new chief, again
    >
    > Palmer described Gallant as "an excellent choice."
    >
    > "I believe he has the knowledge and experience to be a very positive
    > leader for the organization," which includes 38 officers and five
    > civilian employees, he said.
    >
    > 'Life-long learner'
    >
    > Gallant, who left the RCMP in June 2016, has been working with
    > Fisheries and Oceans Canada as regional director of conservation and
    > protection for the Gulf region.
    >
    > He previously served 27 years with the national police force, most
    > recently as chief superintendent for the province for five years and
    > the two years prior as superintendent of the Codiac detachment in the
    > greater Moncton region.
    >
    > The board's release described Gallant as a "life-long learner who has
    > embraced new opportunities throughout his career."
    >
    > He has worked in general duty policing, human resources, major crime
    > and forensic identification.
    >
    > Officer probe continues
    >
    > Gallant takes on his new role with the Kennebecasis Regional Police
    > Force as one of its senior officers remains under criminal
    > investigation for alleged intimidation, sexual harassment, obstruction
    > and mischief involving a female civilian employee.
    >
    > Insp. Jeff Porter, a 29-year veteran, has been suspended with pay
    > since June 2016, when the force barred him from having any contact
    > with the alleged victim, whom he supervised.
    >
    > None of the allegations against Porter have been proven.
    >
    > Kennebecasis Regional Police Force Chief Steve Palmer is scheduled to
    > retire in March, after 34 years with the force. (Kennebecasis Regional
    > Police Force)
    >
    > Palmer, who has been with the force since 1983, has only been the
    > chief for a year.
    >
    > He was promoted from deputy chief when his predecessor Stephen
    > McIntyre retired four days after a scathing report said he failed to
    > properly investigate when the Porter matter when it was brought to his
    > attention.
    >
    > The bard of police commissioners posted the chief's position in June.
    >
    > The board wanted to start the process "well in advance" of Palmer's
    > retirement, seeking both internal and external candidates from across
    > Canada, the chair had said.
    >
    > Palmer will continue in an advisory and support role until his
    > retirement, while Gallant familiarizes himself with force.
    >
    > Will pursue partnerships
    >
    > "Mr. Gallant's philosophy as a police leader is based upon working
    > with community stakeholders and employees in the pursuit of
    > organizational excellence that maximizes officer and community
    > safety," according to the board's release.
    >
    > "This will be done by engaging the community and working with partners
    > to advance evidence‐based strategies and fostering a sense of
    > collective stewardship of the resources available," it said.
    >
    > ​Gallant was honoured with the RCMP's exemplary service medal.
    >
    > He was awarded a the Member of the Order of Merit of Police Officers
    > by the Governor General of Canada in 2015, received a Queen Elizabeth
    > II Diamond Jubilee medal in 2012 and a police leadership award for
    > excellence in organizational innovation from the provincial government
    > in 2011.
    >
    > He has a masters and bachelor degree in education and a bachelor of
    > arts in history.
    >
    > Gallant has spent the majority of his career in New Brunswick but has
    > also worked in Ontario, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland.
    >
    >
    > CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|About CBC News
    >
    >
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/kennebecasis-police-jeff-porter-harassment-1.4809499
    >
    >
    > Kennebecasis officer committed 81 breaches of Police Act, independent
    > report finds
    >
    >  Insp. Jeff Porter to face arbitration hearing Nov. 21 on allegations
    > involving female civilian employee
    > Bobbi-Jean MacKinnon · CBC News · Posted: Nov 09, 2018 6:00 AM AT
    >
    > Insp. Jeff Porter of the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force has been
    > suspended with pay since June 2016. An inspector's annual salary
    > ranges from about $104,000 to $115,000. (Facebook)
    >
    > A senior officer with the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force committed
    > 81 breaches of various sections of the provincial Police Act,
    > including sexual harassment, abuse of authority, corrupt practice and
    > discreditable conduct, an independent investigator hired by the New
    > Brunswick Police Commission has found.
    >
    > Insp. Jeff Porter, a 30-year veteran of the force that covers Rothesay
    > and Quispamsis, also committed five violations of internal policies,
    > including workplace harassment, according to the investigator's report
    > obtained by CBC News.
    >
    > Porter, who contends the allegations against him are false, is
    > scheduled to face a public arbitration hearing with the commission,
    > the provincial policing oversight body, on Nov. 21 at 2 p.m.
    >
    > It comes after the parties were unable to reach an agreement on
    > corrective measures during a private settlement conference last month.
    >
    >     Kennebecasis police culture must change, chief says
    >     Kennebecasis officer under criminal investigation for alleged
    > sexual harassment
    >     Kennebecasis Regional Police Force suspends officer
    >
    > The commission has appointed Edmundston-based lawyer Gary McLaughlin
    > to hear the case. A location has not yet been determined.
    >
    > Porter was suspended with pay more than two years ago after
    > accusations he engaged in a series of inappropriate sexual behaviours
    > involving a female civilian employee he supervised, sources and
    > documents reveal.
    >
    > An inspector's salary is more than $100,000 a year. Municipal and
    > regional forces in New Brunswick cannot suspend an officer without
    > pay.
    >
    > Investigator's findings
    >
    > The commission's investigator, Ottawa-based lawyer Jennifer White,
    > found Porter violated numerous sections of the Police Act's code of
    > professional conduct.
    >
    > White broke down her findings against Porter this way:
    >
    >     Discreditable conduct: 67 counts.
    >     Workplace harassment: six counts.
    >     Neglect of duty: five counts.
    >     Corrupt practice: two counts.
    >     Damage police force property: one count.
    >
    > Porter also committed police force policy violations, White concluded
    > in her report, dated June 28. Among them:
    >
    >     Respectful workplace/harassment policy: three counts.
    >     Workplace harassment: one count.
    >     Personal use of police force assets/property and human resources: one
    > count.
    >
    > No criminal charges
    >
    > Porter's lawyer, Jamie Eddy, had been 'hopeful' a settlement could be
    > reached. (Cox & Palmer)
    >
    > Porter was previously investigated by the New Brunswick RCMP for
    > alleged intimidation, sexual harassment, obstruction and mischief
    > involving the woman he remains barred from having any contact with.
    >
    > No charges were laid.
    >
    > "The Crown did not approve charges be pursued," confirmed Porter's
    > lawyer, Jamie Eddy.
    >
    > "He's relieved on that front that there's no charges, but this whole
    > process has been extremely stressful, and he has family."
    >
    > He said Porter had hoped to resolve the matter during the settlement
    > conference.
    >
    > "My client wants to return to work. That's what his goal is."
    >
    > Eddy has raised questions about whether the police commission met
    > deadlines set out in the Police Act and suggested the issue will be
    > "front and centre" at arbitration.
    >
    > Under the act, an officer must be served with notice of a settlement
    > conference within six months of a complaint being filed. Otherwise,
    > the commission loses jurisdiction and "no further action shall be
    > taken" against the officer.
    >
    > Robert Basque, the lawyer representing the alleged victim, has
    > declined to comment, citing the ongoing proceedings.
    >
    > Range of possible sanctions
    >
    > Steve Roberge, executive director of the New Brunswick Police
    > Commission, could not say how much the Porter investigation has cost
    > to date but said investigations typically range from about $5,000 to
    > more than $100,000, depending on their complexity. (CBC)
    >
    > Steve Roberge, executive director of the New Brunswick Police
    > Commission, said he cannot comment on the specifics of any particular
    > case.
    >
    > But he said settlement conferences are held to "discuss the behaviour
    > that has been the subject of the complaint and to come to some
    > resolution through corrective measures."
    >
    >     I will be fighting the false allegations.
    >     - Jeff Porter, suspended police inspector
    >
    > "When settlement conferences occur, they occur because the
    > investigation has sustained the allegations."
    >
    > Sanctions at the settlement stage can range from a verbal reprimand to
    > dismissal.
    >
    > At the stage coming up, the arbitrator can either dismiss a matter or
    > impose one or a combination of the same range of sanctions that apply
    > at the settlement conference.
    >
    > Felt threatened, intimidated
    >
    > Const. Kelley McIntyre, who was awarded officer of the year by the
    > International Association of Women Police in August 2018, was
    > described by the association as 'a tenacious investigator often
    > consulted by other officers when dealing with domestic violence'
    > cases. (Facebook/Kennebecasis Regional Police Force)
    >
    > The Porter case dates back to February 2016, when the alleged victim
    > confided in Const. Kelley McIntyre that she felt threatened and
    > intimidated by Porter and wanted to quit.
    >
    > McIntyre told another female officer, who told Steve Palmer, the
    > deputy chief at the time, who took the information to then-chief
    > Stephen McIntyre, of no relation to Kelley, and requested the
    > allegations be investigated.
    >
    > Four days later, the chief ordered an investigation — not into Porter
    > but into McIntyre, accusing her of "workplace harassment" for
    > allegedly "poisoning the work environment" of Porter.
    >
    > Kelley McIntyre subsequently filed a Police Act complaint against the
    > chief.
    >
    > "If this was a member of the public, this case would not have been
    > allowed to be handled this way, based on our own policies and the
    > women's abuse protocols," McIntyre wrote in her complaint to the
    > Kennebecasis Regional Joint Board of Police Commissioners, which
    > governs the force.
    >
    > "I believe you will find that there are reasonable grounds to
    > investigate these alleged breaches because they have the effect to
    > undermine public confidence in the force if they continue to be
    > ignored," she wrote.
    >
    > Scathing report on former chief
    >
    > An independent investigator found the chief committed 23 breaches of
    > various sections of the police code of conduct by, among other things,
    > failing "to ensure that the improper or unlawful conduct of Insp.
    > Porter was not concealed."
    >
    > McIntyre, the chief, retired in the wake of the scathing report.
    >
    > In a subsequent interview, he said he had acted without having all the
    > necessary information.
    >
    > This past summer, Kelley McIntyre was awarded officer of the year by
    > the International Association of Women Police, in part because of the
    > support she provided to a colleague during a "major internal
    > investigation involving allegations of sexual harassment," according
    > to media release issued by the association.
    >
    > McIntyre's "courage to come forward caused her and her family a great
    > deal of suffering and personal stress, but this did not stop her from
    > pushing forward and insisting on a proper and professional internal
    > investigation," said the release, which did not refer to the Porter
    > case.
    >
    > New police chief
    >
    > The current police chief, Wayne Gallant, said he could say little
    > about the criminal or Police Act investigations into Porter while the
    > judicial process continues to unfold.
    >
    > "The RCMP investigation is concluded and there's no charges going to
    > be laid criminally and I'm sure as you know criminal harassment is one
    > thing but you know workplace harassment, the thresholds are different,
    > he said.
    >
    > "So the police commission is dealing with the workplace allegations of
    > workplace harassment and that investigation is concluded as well and
    > we're heading into sort of the next stage."
    > Chief Wayne Gallant, left, and Deputy Chief Jeff Giggey, right,
    > recently welcomed recently promoted Inspectors Mary Henderson and
    > Anika Becker to the force's management team. (Facebook/Kennebecasis
    > Regional Police Force)
    >
    > Porter is no longer listed on the force's website but is still an
    > inspector suspended with pay, Gallant said.
    >
    > "Nothing has changed in that regard."
    >
    > In June, Gallant permanently filled two inspector positions by
    > promoting two women to the management rank — a first in the force's
    > 67-year history.
    >
    > "I wouldn't read anything more into that other than the fact that I
    > wanted to have, you know, my leadership team here complete, so that I
    > could go forward with the agenda that I have," said Gallant.
    >
    > The force currently has 37 officers, seven of whom are women, and four
    > female civilian employees.
    >
    > 'No intention of resigning'
    >
    > The New Brunswick Police Commission only has the authority to
    > discipline active police officers.
    >
    > If an officer resigns or retires at any stage of the investigative or
    > disciplinary process, "they are no longer considered a police officer
    > and therefore the Police Act no longer applies to them, which means
    > the proceedings would be halted and annulled," said Roberge.
    >
    > Porter, who joined the force as a patrol officer in 1988 and rose
    > through the ranks, being promoted to sergeant of patrol, then major
    > crime and now inspector of operations, "has no intention of resigning
    > from the police force," said Eddy, his lawyer.
    >
    > "I will be fighting the false allegations," Porter said in an emailed
    > statement.
    >
    > The Police Act states an arbitrator's decision is final, but Roberge
    > said there have been cases where a decision has been challenged
    > through judicial review by a Court of Queen's Bench judge.
    >
    > CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: Robert Steele <>
    > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:00:45 -0400
    > Subject: Re: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps
    > after I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and
    > they denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
    > should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > REMOVE.  All future emails will be dropped to spam.
    >
    > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:51 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > wrote:
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 10:51:16 -0400
    > Subject: RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and Yankee wiretaps after
    > I called The Field Units of the FBI in Washington and Boston and they
    > denied sending me any emails YEA RIGHT Well the FBI and the RCMP
    > should review paragraphs 39, 53, 55 and 61 of the aforesaid complaint
    > To: washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
    > James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov, Marc.Cappellini@ic.fbi.gov, "mark.vespucci"
    > <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>,
    > "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Gilles.Moreau"
    > <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson"
    > <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Wayne.Gallant"
    > <Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "john.warr"
    > <john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>,
    > "Patrick.Fitzgerald"<Patrick.Fitzgerald@skadden.com>, "gregory.craig"
    > <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
    > "Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "Jonathan.Vance"
    > <Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
    > <Greta.Bossenmaier@cse-cst.gc.ca>, robert.david.steele.vivas@gmail.com
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Paul.Lynch"
    > <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
    , sunrayzulu <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>,
    > "Marianne.Ryan"<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "Charmaine.Bulger"
    > <Charmaine.Bulger@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rod.knecht"
    > <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
    >
    > Hey
    >
    > First things first .
    >
    > Here are two old emails of mine that I posted within the blog of Andre
    > Murray's about what went down between the lawyer James Comey and the
    > IRS Special Agent Mark Vespucci and their FBI cohorts and mean old me
    > beginning in late 2001.
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/i-must-tell-all-why-i-am-astounded-and.html
    >
    > Saturday, 22 June 2013
    > I must tell all why I am astounded and delighted that Prez Obama would
    > appoint the crook James Comey of all people to be the boss of the FBI
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/01/good-evening-special-agent-mark.html
    >
    > Wednesday, 16 January 2013
    > Good evening Special Agent Mark Vespucci Say Hoka Hey to Mr Obama's
    > lawyer for me will ya???
    >
    > http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/5-years-waiting-on-bank-fraud-payout.html
    >
    > The former US Attorney James Comey (Who received hard copy of my
    > concerns in 2003) who is now latest boss of the FBI should say Hey his
    > old buddy Hillary Clinton (she got hard copy of the same stuff plus
    > more a little later on in 2003)  and their latest boss Prez Obama
    > (Everybody and his dog knows that he has had Hard Copy of my material
    > since early 2004 CORRECT Bobby Paulson, Petey Baby MacKay, Franky Boy
    > Mckenna, Gregy Craig, Patty Fitzgerald and Bobby Bauer?)
    >
    >  We should not forget the minor minions called Special Agents such as
    > Mark Vespucci and lawyers such as Barry Bachrach. I understand that
    > these sneaky Yankees now work with Marc Cappellini of the FBI in
    > Beantown EH James.Comey and Bob Paulson?
    >
    > https://icwatch.wikileaks.org/docs/jamesbcomey_JamesComeyicfbigovFederalBureauofInvestigation(FBI)Director2014-09-01fbidhs
    >
    > DIRECTOR
    > James B Comey
    > FBI/DHS
    > 202-324-3444
    > James.Comey@ic.fbi.gov
    >
    > FIELD SUPERVISOR
    > Marc B Cappellini
    > 617-223-6465
    > Marc.Cappellini@ic.fbi.gov
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: "Washington Field"<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
    > Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2016 5:13 PM
    > To: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ,
    > Subject: RE: Attn Cst Paul Lynch RE Federal Court File no T-1557-15 and
    > your
    > continued support of Barry Winters and his malevolent cohorts for one year
    > since you first contacted me.
    >
    > The FBI Washington Field Office is in receipt of your emails. It is unclear
    > as to what your complaint is. In order for us to properly assess your
    > complaint, you will need to provide the following details:
    > - Your name and contact information
    > - Full Details about the fraud/crime and a time line of events
    > - Any bio-data you have on the subject (address, email address, name, etc…)
    > - Any supporting/collaborating evidence you might have about the
    > crime/subject
    >
    > Upon providing the above information, the FBI, depending on the
    > circumstances, may work with other federal and local agencies to ensure
    > that
    > the fraud or crime is investigated.
    >
    > Please also be advised that  the Washington Field Office FBI is responsible
    > for investigating federal violations in the Washington D.C. metropolitan
    > area, to include areas of Northern Virginia.  The FBI has 56 field offices
    > throughout the United States, with multiple satellite Resident Agencies
    > covering rural areas related to these 56 field offices.  If you know which
    > state the crime/subject came from, please know that the complaint will be
    > forwarded to that State’s FBI Field Office. Attached is a link with the
    > contact information for each Field Office:
    >
    > http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field/listing_by_state
    >
    >
    > Thank you for your communication.
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 09:38:37 -0400
    > Subject: RE Julian Assange I just called Embassy of Ecuador in London
    > again (011 44 20 7584 1367) Perhaps the former FM Ricardo Patino who
    > is now Minister of Defense will pay attention this time but Yankee
    > lawyers ain't betting on it EH Ron Klain?
    > To: embassy@embassyecuador.ca, postur@for.is, khrafnsson
    > <khrafnsson@gmail.com>, jessica.glenza@theguardian.com
    ,
    > mark.berman@washpost.com, travis@rawstory.com, birgittaj
    > <birgittaj@althingi.is>, ron.klain@revolution.com,
    > liam.stack@nytimes.com, jon.herskovitz@thomsonreuters.com, birgitta
    > <birgitta@this.is>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
    > "chineseembassy.ca"<chineseembassy.ca@gmail.com>, eperalta@npr.org,
    > gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
    > "john.warr"<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ,
    > tmg@goodrelations.co.uk, dtnews@telegraph.co.uk,
    > harriet.alexander@telegraph.co.uk
    >
    > Why is Julian Assange still inside the embassy of Ecuador?
    > More than three years ago WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fled into
    > the embassy of Ecuador in London. But why is he there, and will he
    > ever leave?
    >
    > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/11681502/Why-is-Julian-Assange-still-inside-the-embassy-of-Ecuador.html
    >
    > "WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson said that they would not
    > believe any assurances "short of an open, official, formal
    > confirmation that the US government is not going to prosecute
    > WikiLeaks".
    >
    > Ecuador defense ministry spat ends in shake-up
    > AFP•March 3, 2016
    >
    > https://www.yahoo.com/news/ecuador-defense-ministry-spat-ends-shake-215544405.html?ref=gs
    >
    > "Ecuador's top diplomat, Ricardo Patino, will take over as defense
    > minister after the previous chief resigned in a spat over cuts to the
    > military pension fund by President Rafael Correa, officials said
    > Thursday.
    >
    > Patino, a close ally of the leftist president, has held a series of
    > cabinet posts in his administration, and has been highly visible as
    > foreign minister for his outspoken defense of Ecuador's decision to
    > grant exile to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in its London
    > embassy."
    >
    > http://www.embassyecuador.ca/english/index.php?id=contacto
    >
    > EMBASSY OF ECUADOR IN CANADA
    > OTTAWA
    >
    > AMBASSADOR
    > H.E. Nicolás Trujllo-Newlin
    > 99 Bank Street, Suite 230
    > Ottawa, Ontario
    > K1P 6B9
    > Tel: (613) 563 – 8206
    > (613) 563 – 4286
    > Fax: (613) 235 – 5776
    > E-mail: embassy@embassyecuador.ca
    >
    > Consul Mr. Marcel Gross
    > 2055 Peel, Suite 601
    > Montreal, Québec
    > H3A 1V4
    > Phone number: (514) 874 – 4071
    > Fax: (514) 874 – 9078
    >
    > E-mail: info@consecuador-quebec.org
    >
    > Jurisdiction: Québec, New Brunswick, Nova Scottia, P.E.I, Newfoundland
    > and Labrador
    >
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
    >>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
    >>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
    >>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
    >>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
    >>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
    >>> to be..
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
    >>>
    >>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> This is the docket
    >>>
    >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>>
    >>> These are digital recordings of  the last two hearings
    >>>
    >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>>
    >>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>>
    >>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
    >>>
    >>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
    >>> Campaign, Rogers TV
    >>>
    >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
    >>>
    >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
    >>>
    >>> Veritas Vincit
    >>> David Raymond Amos
    >>> 902 800 0369
    >>>
    >>>
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: <justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
    > Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
    > Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
    > Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
    > submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
    > dudes are way past too late
    > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >
    >
    > Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
    > lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >
    > Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
    > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >
    > Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
    > lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >
    > To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
    > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >
    > Thank you,
    >
    > Merci ,
    >
    >
    > http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >
    >
    > 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    > five years after he began his bragging:
    >
    > January 13, 2015
    > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >
    > December 8, 2014
    > Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >
    > Friday, October 3, 2014
    > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    > Stupid Justin Trudeau
    >
    > Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
    > behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
    >
    > When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    > actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
    > in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
    > the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
    > involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
    > significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
    > of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
    > operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
    > Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
    > The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
    > deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
    > Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
    > redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
    > less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
    > alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
    > then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
    > incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
    > professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
    > Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
    > campaign of 2006.
    >
    > What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
    > Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
    > Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
    > support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
    >
    > What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
    > chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
    > less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
    > as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
    > deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
    >
    > The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
    > the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
    > That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
    > constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
    > remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
    > non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
    > regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
    > instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
    > limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
    >
    > President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
    > attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
    > Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
    > and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
    > initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
    > essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
    > ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
    > and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
    > or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
    > terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
    > “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
    > Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
    > ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
    > Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
    >
    > One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
    > was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
    > amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
    > denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
    > self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
    > “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
    > G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
    > behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
    > Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
    > cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
    > are not.
    >
    > Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
    > mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
    > world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
    > David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
    > and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
    > and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
    > “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
    > criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
    > tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
    >
    > In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
    > “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
    > successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
    > marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
    > military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
    > equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
    > antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
    > years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
    > won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
    >
    > My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
    > Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
    > Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
    > served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
    > democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
    > other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
    > these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
    > other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
    >
    > Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
    > and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
    > shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
    >
    > Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
    >
    > From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
    > Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
    > Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
    > the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
    > alive
    > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >
    > This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
    > your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
    > to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
    >
    >>>>>
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    > Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
    > Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
    > War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
    > To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
    > Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
    > william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    , stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
    > dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
    > milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
    > sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
    > <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
    > susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
    , Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
    > eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
    > Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
    > <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
    > <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
    >
    > I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
    > Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
    > Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
    > CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
    > be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
    > that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
    > if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
    > about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
    > old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
    > never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
    > interesting though
    >
    > http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
    >
    > http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
    >
    > Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
    > this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
    > Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
    > Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
    >
    > http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
    >
    > The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
    > shy political animal
    >
    > Veritas Vincit
    > David Raymond Amos
    > 902 800 0369
    >
    > Enjoy Mr Weston
    > http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
    >
    > "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
    > brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
    > says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
    > to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
    > including a Canadian general.
    >
    > That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
    > who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
    > U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
    > also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
    > prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
    >
    > http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
    >
    > "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
    > being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
    > demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
    > "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
    > into the US policy.
    >
    > At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
    > colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
    > in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
    > report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
    > never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
    > were deployed WMD.
    >
    > Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
    > invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
    > concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
    > (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
    > about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
    > that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
    > authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
    >
    > There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
    > its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
    > to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
    > folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
    > upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
    > are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    > and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
    > Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
    > correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
    > George W Bush administration was onerous
    >
    > American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
    > military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
    > naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
    > in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
    > thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
    > operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
    > lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
    > ....not necessarily in that order. "
    >
    > You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
    > Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
    >
    > http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
    >
    >
    > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >
    > Recorded entry(ies) for T-1557-15
    > (
    > Court number information Court Number : T-1557-15
    >
    > Style of Cause : DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    > Proceeding Category : Actions Nature : Others - Crown (v. Queen) [Actions]
    > Type of Action : Ordinary
    >
    > 38 records found for T-1557-15  Doc Date Filed Office Recorded Entry
    > Summary
    > - 2016-02-25 Ottawa Copy of Notice of Appeal (Appeal Court File No.
    > A-48-16 ) appealing NOTICE OF CROSS APPEAL filed in Federal Court of
    > Appeal filed in the Court of Appeal on 12-FEB-2016 on behalf of
    > Plaintiff placed on file on 25-FEB-2016
    >
    > - 2016-02-16 Ottawa Copy of Notice of Appeal (Appeal Court File No.
    > A-48-16 ) appealing Order of Southcott, J. dated 25-JAN-2016 filed in
    > the Court of Appeal on 04-FEB-2016 on behalf of Plaintiff placed on
    > file on 16-FEB-2016
    >
    > - 2016-01-25 Toronto Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Plaintiff
    > and Defendant via fax transmission confirmation with respect to Order
    > and Reasons dated 25-JAN-2016 placed on file on 25-JAN-2016
    >
    > - 2016-01-25 Toronto Certificate of Order certifying that the Court
    > (Justice Southcott) on 25-JAN-2016 ordered at the end of his Order and
    > Reasons as follows: "This Court Orders that: 1. the Plaintiff's appeal
    > is allowed in part; 2. the Order of Prothonotary Morneau dated
    > 12-NOV-2015 is set aside; 3. the claims for relief in the final
    > paragraph of the Plaintiff's Statement of Claim are struck without
    > leave to amend, with the exception of the claim for monetary relief
    > for allegedly being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick
    > legislature in 2004; 4. the Defendant is at liberty to present a
    > motion, to be filed within 30 days of the date of this Order or any
    > decision resulting from any appeal of this Order, arguing which
    > specific paragraphs of the Statement of Claim should be struck in
    > order to accord with my decision; 5. the time for the Defendant to
    > file a Statement of Defence is extended to 30 days from the date of
    > this Order, the date of any Order resulting from a motion by the
    > Defendant arguing which specific paragraphs of the Statement of Claim
    > should be struck in order to accord with my decision, and the date of
    > any decision resulting from any appea of either such Order; and 6. No
    > costs are awarded on this motion." placed on file on 25-JAN-2016
    >
    > 20 2016-01-25 Toronto Reasons and Order dated 25-JAN-2016 rendered by
    > The Honourable Mr. Justice Southcott Matter considered with personal
    > appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc. No. 8
    > Result: granted in part 2. the Order of Prothonotary Morneau dated
    > 12-NOV-2015 is set aside; 3. claims for relief in final paragraph of
    > Plaintiff's Statement of claim are struck without leave to amend, ...
    > 4. Defendant is at liberty to present a motion, to be filed within 30
    > days.. 5. time for Defendant to file a Statement of Defence is
    > extended to 30 days... 6. No costs are awarde on this motion. **(see
    > Reasons and Order for complete wording)** Filed on 25-JAN-2016
    > certified copies sent to parties Interlocutory Decision Copy of
    > Reasons for Order entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1290 page(s) 470 -
    > 484
    >
    > - 2016-01-11 Fredericton Receipt for payment audio CD hearing Dec 14,
    > 2015 and Jan 11, 2016. Req.by Roger Richard placed on file on
    > 11-JAN-2016
    >
    > - 2016-01-11 Fredericton Receipt for payment copy audio CD recording
    > hearing Jan 11, 2016. Requested by Plaintiff placed on file on
    > 11-JAN-2016
    >
    > - 2016-01-11 Fredericton Fredericton 11-JAN-2016 BEFORE The Honourable
    > Mr. Justice Southcott Language: E Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 8
    > on behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter reserved held in
    > Court Duration per day: 11-JAN-2016 from 09:31 to 10:47 Courtroom :
    > Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court Registrar: Michel Morneault Total
    > Duration: 1h16min Appearances: David Raymond Amos 902-800-0369
    > representing the Plaintiff on his own behalf Jill Chisholm
    > 902-426-7570 representing Defendant Comments: DARS Z005130 was used
    > for the recording of the hearing Minutes of Hearing entered in Vol.
    > 943 page(s) 475 - 477 Abstract of Hearing placed on file
    >
    > - 2015-12-23 Ottawa Acknowledgment of Receipt received from all
    > parties with respect to the Order of the Court rendered on December
    > 14, 2015. (via fax) placed on file on 23-DEC-2015
    >
    > 19 2015-12-23 Fredericton Order dated 14-DEC-2015 rendered by The
    > Honourable Mr. Justice Bell Matter considered with personal appearance
    > The Court's decision is with regard to Motion Doc. No. 8 Result:
    > Delivered orally from the Bench on December 14, 2015. As a result of
    > my recusal, this Court orders that the Administrator of the Court
    > schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There is no order
    > as to costs. Filed on 23-DEC-2015 entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1288
    > page(s) 428 - 430 Interlocutory Decision
    >
    > - 2015-12-23 Fredericton Correction to General Sitting concerning
    > Motion Doc. No. 8 Hearing rescheduled from General Sitting at
    > Fredericton on 14-DEC-2015 to General Sitting at Fredericton on
    > 11-JAN-2016 at 09:30 duration: 2h Language: E Reason for correction:
    > The presiding Judge recused himself on 14-DEC-2015 sitting
    >
    > - 2015-12-14 Fredericton Receipt for payment CD audio recording of the
    > hearing on 14-DEC-2015, req. by Plaintiff placed on file on
    > 14-DEC-2015
    >
    > - 2015-12-14 Fredericton Fredericton 14-DEC-2015 BEFORE The Honourable
    > Mr. Justice Bell Language: E Before the Court: Motion Doc. No. 8 on
    > behalf of Plaintiff Result of Hearing: Matter adjourned sine die held
    > in Court Duration per day: 14-DEC-2015 from 09:35 to 10:42 Courtroom :
    > Courtroom No. 1 - Fredericton Court Registrar: Michel Morneault Total
    > Duration: 1h07min Appearances: David Raymond Amos 902-800-0369
    > representing on his own behalf Jill Chisholm 902-426-7570 representing
    > Defendant Comments: Tascam Backup was used for the recording of the
    > hearing. Plaintiff requested an audio CD of the hearing. Minutes of
    > Hearing entered in Vol. 943 page(s) 46 - 47 Abstract of Hearing placed
    > on file
    >
    > 17 2015-12-10 Halifax Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf of
    > Jill Chisholm confirming service of the Defendant's Motion Record
    > (Doc.16) upon Plaintiff by courier on 10-DEC-2015 filed on 10-DEC-2015
    >
    > 16 2015-12-10 Halifax Motion Record in response to Motion Doc. No. 8
    > containing the following original document(s): 14 15 Number of copies
    > received: 3 on behalf of Defendant filed on 10-DEC-2015
    >
    > 15 2015-12-10 Halifax Written Representations contained within a
    > Motion Record on behalf of Defendant concerning Motion Doc. No. 8
    > filed on 10-DEC-2015
    >
    > 14 2015-12-10 Halifax Affidavit of Jill Thomson sworn on 10-DEC-2015
    > contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Defendant in opposition
    > to Motion Doc. No. 8 with Exhibits 1 & 2 filed on 10-DEC-2015
    >
    > 13 2015-12-08 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
    > sworn on 08-DEC-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
    > doc.12 (doc.8,10,11) upon Defendant by Priority next day mail on
    > 08-DEC-2015 filed on 08-DEC-2015
    >
    > 12 2015-12-08 Fredericton Motion Record containing the following
    > original document(s): 8 10 11 Number of copies received: 3 on behalf
    > of Plaintiff filed on 08-DEC-2015
    >
    > 11 2015-12-08 Fredericton Written Representations contained within a
    > Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff concerning Motion Doc. No. 8
    > filed on 08-DEC-2015
    >
    > 10 2015-12-08 Fredericton Affidavit of David Raymond Amos sworn on
    > 08-DEC-2015 contained within a Motion Record on behalf of Plaintiff in
    > support of Motion Doc. No. 8 with Exhibits A & B (Exhibit A is a CD)
    > filed on 08-DEC-2015
    >
    > - 2015-11-23 Fredericton Memorandum to file from Michel G. Morneault
    > dated 23-NOV-2015 a copy of the Notice of Motion filed on November
    > 20th, 2015 appealing the decision of Proth. Morneau dated November
    > 12th, 2015, sent to Mr. Morneau placed on file.
    >
    > 9 2015-11-20 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
    > sworn on 20-NOV-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
    > doc.8 upon Defendant by mail on 20-NOV-2015 filed on 20-NOV-2015
    >
    > 8 2015-11-20 Fredericton Notice of Motion on behalf of Plaintiff
    > returnable at General Sitting in Fredericton on 14-DEC-2015 to begin
    > at 09:30 duration: 2h language: E for an appeal of the decision of
    > Richard Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary dated 12-NOV-2015 Doc. No. 6 filed
    > on 20-NOV-2015
    >
    > - 2015-11-19 Ottawa Letter sent by Registry on 19-NOV-2015 to
    > Plaintiff providing a certified copy of the order dated 12-NOV-2015 to
    > the Plaintiff that had previously been faxed to him on 12-NOV-2015 and
    > 19-NOV-2015 Copy placed on file.
    >
    > - 2015-11-19 Ottawa Confirmation of receipt by fax printout by the
    > Plaintiff of the Order dated 12-NOV-2015 of Mr. Prothonotary Morneau
    > placed on file on 19-NOV-2015
    >
    > - 2015-11-12 Montréal Acknowledgment of Receipt received from parties
    > with respect to reception of order 6 placed on file on 12-NOV-2015
    >
    > 6 2015-11-12 Montréal Order dated 12-NOV-2015 rendered by Richard
    > Morneau, Esq., Prothonotary Matter considered without personal
    > appearance The Court's decision is with regard to Motion in writing
    > Doc. No. 2 Result: granted Filed on 12-NOV-2015 copies sent to parties
    > entered in J. & O. Book, volume 1283 page(s) 357 - 359 Interlocutory
    > Decision
    >
    > - 2015-11-06 Montréal Communication to the Court from the Registry
    > dated 06-NOV-2015 re: Notice of Motion (doc. #2) + request for
    > direction
    >
    > 18 2015-10-26 Fredericton Affidavit of service of David Raymond Amos
    > sworn on 26-OCT-2015 on behalf of Plaintiff confirming service of
    > doc.7 upon Defendant by mail on 26-OCT-2015 filed on 26-OCT-2015
    >
    > 7 2015-10-26 Montréal Motion Record in response to Motion Doc. No. 2
    > Number of copies received: 1 on behalf of Plaintiff (filed as per
    > order 6; one copy only) filed on 26-OCT-2015
    >
    > 5 2015-10-14 St. John's Solicitor's certificate of service on behalf
    > of Jill Chisholm confirming service of Doc 4 Motion Record upon
    > Plaintiff by Courier on 14-OCT-2015 filed on 14-OCT-2015
    >
    > 4 2015-10-14 St. John's Motion Record Number of copies received: 3 on
    > behalf of Defendant filed on 14-OCT-2015
    >
    > - 2015-10-14 St. John's Draft Order concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
    > received on 14-OCT-2015
    >
    > 3 2015-10-14 St. John's Written Representations contained within a
    > Motion Record on behalf of Defendant concerning Motion Doc. No. 2
    > filed on 14-OCT-2015
    >
    > 2 2015-10-14 St. John's Notice of Motion contained within a Motion
    > Record on behalf of Defendant in writing to be dealt with in the
    > Montréal local office for an Order purusant to Rules 221(1)(a) and (c)
    > to strike and an order pursuant to Rule 8 extention of time to serve
    > and file Defence. filed on 14-OCT-2015 Draft Order\\Judgment received.
    >
    > - 2015-09-16 Fredericton Letter sent by Registry on 16-SEP-2015 to DOJ
    > Halifax R.133 service letter Copy placed on file.
    >
    > 1 2015-09-16 Fredericton Statement of Claim and 2 cc's filed on
    > 16-SEP-2015 Certified copy(ies)/copy(ies) transmitted to Director of
    > the Regional Office of the Department of Justice Section 48 - $2.00
    >
    > The last database update occurred on 2016-07-14 12:09
    > Top of page
    >
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:24:50 -0400
    > Subject: Re: The FSB, Federal Court file no T-1557-15 ,secret oaths to
    > the British Queen and the evil Feds etc FYI I did call Moody's lawyer
    > Goggins When he did not pick up I contacted Michael Adler an he did
    > not return my call.
    > To: michael.adler@moodys.com, sallilyn.schwartz@moodys.com,
    > ir@moodys.com, Richard.Cantor@moodys.com, John.Goggins@moodys.com,
    > caitlin.workman@canada.ca, press@bankofengland.co.uk,
    > Joe.Perry@fsb.org, embassy.ottawa@mfa.ee, "Dale.Morgan"
    > <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.warr"<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    > "Wayne.Gallant"<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "Marc.Litt"
    > <Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com>, Robert_Glauber@harvard.edu,
    > "PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, sunrayzulu
    > <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu@justice.gc.ca, "bill.pentney"
    > <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, washington field
    > <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
    > "Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
    , pol7163
    > <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, patrick_doran1
    > <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, "rod.knecht"
    > <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
    , cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, eps
    > <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ,
    > b.spurlock@octafinance.com, s.holbrook@octafinance.com, NBInvestigates
    > <NBInvestigates@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
    > bostncs <bostncs@international.gc.ca>
    >
    > So before I leave for a little vacation and not be available for
    > awhile. I will leave you all with some very serious stuff to consider.
    >
    > Sometimes less is more so this email should prove to the RCMP who will
    > no doubt wish to harass me some more and all your lawyers that I am
    > not joking when acting in defense of my Clan. If you don't believe me
    > ask the Wilson-Raybould and her many minions about my lititigation ask
    > the Queen of England and I bet ya they will all play as dumb as post
    > as per their oath to the Queen's Privy Council or the BAR.
    >
    > Need I say you snobby Yankee lawyers who take the liberty to assume
    > the title of  "Esquire" a joke to mean old me?
    >
    > I would lay odds that my long dead Loyalist ancesters are rolling in
    > the their graves in Fundy Royal and laughing at a very simple but oh
    > so true statement made by a wild child of theirs. FYI your Yankee
    > Constitution does not recognize titles so you and lord over your
    > fellow men. Who the Hell are you to call yourselves sons of Lords?
    >
    > To be fair to the nasy Yankees Politicians who call themselves
    > Honourable are the biggest jokes of all
    >
    > Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, P.C., M.P.
    > Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
    >
    > Parliament Hill:
    > Telephone: 613-992-1416
    > Fax: 613-992-1460
    >
    > Department:
    > Justice
    > 284 Wellington Street
    > Ottawa, Ontario
    > K1A 0H8
    > Telephone: 613-992-4621
    > TTY: 613-992-4556
    > Fax: 613-954-0811
    > E-Mail: mcu@justice.gc.ca
    >
    > First things first have a Look at the 3 documents hereto attached (Not
    > a big read)
    >
    > Listen to these old voicemails from interesting FEDS at about  the
    > same point in time (Won't take long)
    >
    > http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
    >
    > then ask youselves or the lawyers Senator Shelby or Spizter or Cutler
    > or Bernie madoff's old buddy Robert Glauber where the webcast and
    > transcript went for a very important hearing held in late 2003 by the
    > United States Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
    >
    > http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/hearings?ID=90F8E691-9065-4F8C-A465-72722B47E7F2
    >
    > Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
    > Mutual Fund Industry
    >
    > November 20, 2003 02:00 PM
    > The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
    > series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
    > Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
    >
    >     Archived Webcast
    >
    > Witness Panel 1
    >
    > Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
    >     Director - Division of Enforcement
    >     Securities and Exchange Commission
    >     cutler.pdf (175.5 KBs)
    >
    > Mr. Robert Glauber
    >     Chairman and CEO
    >     National Association of Securities Dealers
    >     glauber.pdf (171.1 KBs)
    >
    > Eliot Spitzer
    >     Attorney General
    >     State of New York
    >     spitzer.pdf (68.2 KBs)
    >
    > Permalink:
    > http://www.banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2003/11/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
    >
    >
    > Trust that the evil women and men that  PM Trudeau "The Younger"
    > appointed to to his cabinet will continue to play dumb because of
    > their oath to The Privy Council. However it does not follow that
    > everybody who works for them are dumb and they have no such oath to
    > uphold N'esy Pas?.
    >
    > Veritas Vincit
    > David Raymond Amos
    > 902 800 0369
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:14:00 -0700
    > Subject: WikiLeaks' Julian Assange to leave Embassy of Ecuador in
    > London soon??? Attn Ecuadorian FM Ricardo Patino and Amb Dr. Andres
    > Teran-Parral I don't think Fernando would disagree when I say this is
    > NO COINCIDENCE
    > To: eecucanada@cancilleria.gob.ec, khrafnsson@gmail.com, birgittaj
    > <birgittaj@althingi.is>, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>,
    > birgitta@this.is, chinaemb_ca@mfa.gov.cn, embassy@embassyecuador.ca,
    > ecuador@telus.net, enquiries@canninghouse.org, postur@irr.is,
    > "calgary.northernhills"<calgary.northernhills@assembly.ab.ca>,
    > "calgary.hays"<calgary.hays@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.cross"
    > <calgary.cross@assembly.ab.ca>
    , premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
    > <premier@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
    > richardwtc@gmail.com, "rod.knecht"<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
    ,
    > editor@desmogblog.com, chineseembassy.ca@gmail.com, lgunter
    > <lgunter@shaw.ca>, "joshua.skurnik"<joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>,
    > oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, COCMoncton
    > <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, dave.peiser@peiserforcongress.com, RBauer
    > <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, bginsberg <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>,
    > bairdj <bairdj@parl.gc.ca>, chinaconsul_cal_ca@mfa.gov.cn,
    > "greg.weston"<greg.weston@cbc.ca>, jack.tomik@cbc.ca,
    > alan.dark@cbc.ca, Mindy.Qi@nexencnoocltd.com
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , frankffrost
    > <frankffrost@hotmail.com>, "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>,
    > "John.Grierson"<John.Grierson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "Darren.Woroshelo"
    > <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Rod.Booth"
    > <Rod.Booth@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "craig.callens"
    > <craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    , "ron.klain"
    > <ron.klain@revolution.com>, "Geoffrey.McDonald"
    > <Geoffrey.McDonald@gov.bc.ca>, "dean.buzza"
    > <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    >
    > http://wikileaks-press.org/press-conference-with-foreign-minister-ricardo-patino-aroca-ecuador-grants-asylum-to-julian-assange-english-translation/
    >
    > https://twitter.com/RicardoPatinoEC
    >
    > http://www.ricardopatino.com/
    >
    > http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2014/08/18/julian-assange-wikileaks-ecuadorian-embassy-london/14219537/
    >
    > WikiLeaks' Julian Assange to leave embassy 'soon'
    >
    > Kim Hjelmgaard, USA TODAY 11:08 a.m. EDT August 18, 2014
    >
    > LONDON — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange announced Monday that after
    > spending two years in the Embassy of Ecuador in London he will "soon"
    > leave the diplomatic safe harbor.
    >
    > He made the comments during a joint press conference with Ecuador's
    > Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino. Assange did not elaborate on the
    > timing or address whether an impasse over his potential extradition
    > had been resolved.
    >
    > It was suggested in the British press over the weekend that Assange
    > may need hospital treatment for a heart defect and lung condition and
    > that any move could be to remedy those suspected health problems.
    >
    > However, Assange refused to be drawn on those specific points Monday,
    > saying only that when he does leave it will "probably not" be for the
    > reasons reported on.
    >
    > WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson later clarified Assange's
    > claim. Hrafnsson said the issue of Assange's extradition must first be
    > resolved before he can leave.
    >
    > "The plan is to leave as soon as the U.K. government decides to honor
    > its obligations," Hrafnsson said, referring to guarantees he is
    > seeking over the right to travel to Ecuador.
    >
    > Still, Assange said that his health has suffered as a result of his
    > confinement.
    >
    > "It's (the embassy) an environment in which any healthy person would
    > find themselves soon enough with certain difficulties they would have
    > to manage," Assange said. He said the embassy "has no outside areas,
    > no sunlight."
    >
    > Assange, 43, fled to the embassy in 2012 fearing extradition to the
    > U.S. via Sweden, where authorities want to question him over
    > allegations related to a sexual assault.
    >
    > Ecuador has granted him refugee status and says it remains committed
    > to his protection, but British police have so far refused to let
    > Assange leave the embassy and it is thought that he would be arrested
    > if he tried to do so.
    >
    > In 2010, WikiLeaks published a tranche of leaked military and
    > diplomatic cables and Assange has been the subject of an investigation
    > by U.S. authorities.
    >
    >
    > https://www.facebook.com/wikileaks/posts/136980676312318
    >
    > Wikileaks
    >
    > June 18, 2010 ·
    > .
    >
    > Wikileaks' Julian Assange has limited ability to respond to
    > interviews. Please contact spokespersons below. (now with correction
    > on Kristinn's email)
    >
    >
    >  Kristinn Hrafnsson
    >  Journalist RUV (Icelandic equivalent to the BBC), one of two
    > journalists WikiLeaks sent to Baghdad.
    >  Tel:+354 821 7121
    >  Email: khrafnsson at gmail.com
    >
    >
    >  Birgitta Jonsdottir
    >  Member of the Icelandic Parliament, Key speaker for the IMMI
    > proposal, co-producer of the Baghdad video
    >  Tel: +354 692 8884
    >  Email: birgitta at this.is
    >
    >
    > http://www.collateralmurder.com/en/contact.html
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:06:21 -0600
    > Subject: Fwd: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
    > China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
    > Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
    > To: "calgary.northernhills"<calgary.northernhills@assembly.ab.ca>,
    > "calgary.hays"<calgary.hays@assembly.ab.ca>, "calgary.cross"
    > <calgary.cross@assembly.ab.ca>
    , premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , premier
    > <premier@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>
    >
    > Associate Minister – International and Intergovernmental Relations (Asia)
    >
    > Ms. Woo-Paw was elected to her second term as Member of the
    > Legislative Assembly for Calgary-Northern Hills on April 23, 2012. She
    > currently serves as the Associate Minister – International and
    > Intergovernmental Relations (Asia). Ms. Woo-Paw is also the Chair of
    > the Asia Advisory Council.
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:02:39 -0600
    > Subject: Fwd: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
    > China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
    > Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
    > To: eecucanada@cancilleria.gob.ec
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Doug Brinkman <richardwtc@gmail.com>
    > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 11:01:16 -0600
    > Subject: Re: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
    > China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
    > Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thanks David - you said you had a photo of the blogger "The Bacon Fat" are
    > you willing to share it with me?
    >
    > Regards Doug Brinkman
    >
    > *Hawkeyi Active - A Civil Information Company*
    > Photo, Art, Graphic Design and Video Productions.
    >  Hawkeyi.com <http://www.ciactivist.org/HawkeyiMedia.html>,  Phone:
    > 780.424.1538
    >
    > *Civil Information Activism- Free News on YouTube*
    > #YEG Community News ciactivist.org
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:41:16 -0600
    > Subject: Fwd: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
    > China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
    > Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
    > To: chineseembassy.ca@gmail.com, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>,
    > "joshua.skurnik"<joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, richardwtc@gmail.com
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "dean.buzza"
    > <dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, editor <editor@desmogblog.com>
    >
    > Attn
    >
    > Economic and Commercial Section.
    > 401 King Edward Avenue
    > Ottawa (Ontario) K1N 9C9
    > chineseembassy.ca@gmail.com.
    >
    > My number is 902 800 0389
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:27:05 -0600
    > Subject: Fwd: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of
    > China and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange
    > Bankster, Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
    > To: dave.peiser@peiserforcongress.com, RBauer
    > <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, bginsberg <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "ron.klain"
    > <ron.klain@revolution.com>, dkilgour <dkilgour@guelphmercury.com>
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 16:08:18 -0600
    > Subject: Attn Ambassador Luo Zhaohui of the People's Republic of China
    > and Ambassador Dr. Andres Teran-Parral Re Snowden Assange Bankster,
    > Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
    > To: chinaemb_ca@mfa.gov.cn, embassy@embassyecuador.ca,
    > ecuador@telus.net, birgittaj <birgittaj@althingi.is>, birgittajoy
    > <birgittajoy@gmail.com>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Jacques.Poitras"
    > <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
    > <andre@jafaust.com>
    >
    > EMBASSY OF ECUADOR IN CANADA
    > OTTAWA
    > 99 Bank Street, Suite 230
    > Ottawa, Ontario
    > K1P 6B9
    > Tel: (613) 563 – 8206
    > (613) 563 – 4286
    > Fax: (613) 235 – 5776
    > E-mail: embassy@embassyecuador.ca
    >
    >
    > VANCOUVER
    > AD HONOREM
    > CONSULATE GENERAL
    >
    > 3835 Trinity Street
    > Burnaby, British Columbia
    > V5C 1N4
    > Tel: (604) 299 – 6600
    > Fax: (604) 789 – 3719
    >
    > E-mail: ecuador@telus.net
    >
    >
    > Ambassador Luo Zhaohui
    > Embassy Address:
    > 515 St. Patrick Street, Ottawa, ON K1N 5H3
    > Tel: 613-7893434
    > Fax: 613-7891911
    > E-mail: chinaemb_ca@mfa.gov.cn
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 15:54:52 -0600
    > Subject: Attn Wang Xinping Consulate General of the People's Republic
    > of China in Calgary Re Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and
    > Obama etc
    > To: chinaconsul_cal_ca@mfa.gov.cn
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > http://calgary.china-consulate.org/eng/zlszc/
    >
    > Consul General Wang Xinping
    > 1011 6th Ave. S.W.
    > Calgary,Alberta,
    > Canada T2P 0W1
    > Tel:403-2643322
    > Fax:403-2646656
    > Email: chinaconsul_cal_ca@mfa.gov.cn
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:00:27 -0600
    > Subject: Re Nexen, Pipelines. the Maritime Link, Harper and Obama etc
    > To: "Qi, Mindy (Calgary)"<Mindy.Qi@nexencnoocltd.com>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > Good Day Ms Qi
    >
    > Trust that I am impressed with your Integrity and diligence (No Joke).
    > After I send this email I will try to get an better connection and
    > call you again in short order. Whereas you now speak for a state owned
    > Corporation that operates within my  native land of Canada and the USA
    > as well (both of which I am a person of) we really should discuss page
    > 3 of this old PDf file of mine.
    >
    http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/UN%20DUDES-txt.pdf
    >
    > In order to briefy explain to you the documents I forwarded to you
    > yesterday I will say that at the very least I proved to CNOOC that I
    > am a whisleblower against the very corrupt Justice Systems and the
    > Financial Industy operating within at least 10 purportedly profound
    > democracies. The documents do prove that I sued 3 US Treasury Agents
    > and many others at least once back in 2002 and that many government
    > offials and many others are well aware of that fact. In 2004
    > I remained true to my words to politicians such as Harper, MacKay,
    > Layton, the PM Martin, Anne McLellan (a former director of Nexen's)
    > and their many parliamentry cohorts and ran for a seat in Canada's
    > 38th Parliament
    >
    > Later in 2004 I was falsely imprisoned  after I returned to the USA in
    > order to continue to argue in court about my family's rights and
    > interests. My false arrest was done in open court before the Speech
    > from the Throne on Oct 1st 2004. The arrest was recorded on the public
    > record without a warrant or even a reason statedand I was held in
    > solitary confinement under the charges of "Other" with no bail terms
    > offered. After a few days DEFAIT was compelled to send one of its
    > consulate officers and some secretive member of the Canadian
    > Department of Public Safety to visit me in the Yankee jail. All those
    > mindless bureaucrats did was laugh at my plight and told me that they
    > could do nothing to help me be released from my false imprisonment. I
    > got of jail on my own with a lot of help from members of my Clan.Thus
    > in my humble opinion the Yankees and my fellow Canadians have no right
    > whatsoever to chastise the Chinese to doing similiar things to other
    > people. Imagine if such things were done to Stephen Harper in 2004?
    > Ten years later Harper is still playing dumb even though I debated one
    > of his lawyers in front of hundreds of people and his personal
    > computer answered my concerns weeks BEFORE I was falsely imprisoned.
    > Go Figure why I ran against the Bloc, the Green meanies, the NDO, the
    > Libranos and Harper and the Boyz in Blue again the following year.
    >
    > Anyway before I returned to Canada in order to escape false
    > imprisonment once again and to prepare run for a seat in the 39th
    > Parlaiment I contacted many foreign embassies and particularly
    > China's. I did so because in October of 2004 I had registered my
    > idignation that the former Canadian PM Mulroney (As Chairman of
    > Forbes) had arranged a huge meeting of worldwide CEOs in China while
    > Bush was seekiiing reelection and everyone ignored or laughed at me.
    > So in return for bureaucratic incompetence I sent the members of the
    > G20 and others within the UN a rather huge pile of documents byway of
    > registered US Mail. China got them and I have the proof that they did.
    > The link I provided above is only to the cover letters..
    >
    > Trust that again last year I reminded many countries of the documents
    > I sent them in 2005 after the NSA whistleblower Snowden sought refuge
    > in Hong Kong and the Russia. Here is just a little proof of what I say
    > is true.
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
    >
    > Yesterday after speaking with lady within your "Integrity" office and
    > discussing the recent emails I had sent to DEFAIT etc they asked to
    > see the email with the attached documents and I quickly obliged.
    > However after their email address proved to be inoperative I called
    > your Head Office in Calgary in a effort to speak to Fang Zhi or one of
    > his underlings. The lady who answered the phone wanted to know my
    > business and then laughed at my effort to speak to any member of the
    > executive in Calgary. I did not find that funny at all and I quickly
    > told her that she could laugh at me all she wished but I would call
    > her bosses in China if need be.
    >
    > For the record I was tryiing to inform you folks in Nexen about many
    > things but my past dealings with Nexen, the Chinese govenment and
    > people within the Canadian government such as Nexen's former director
    > Anne McLellan  and  CNOOC's current director Kevin Lynch should
    > concern your "Integrity" people greatly today.
    >
    > I hope you folks at NEXEN at least noticed the letter that the Chair
    > of BHP sent to me in September of 2010 months before Harper stopped
    > his takeover bid of Potash Corp. I could talk about the ramifications
    > of that one letter alone for several hours.
    >
    > FYI I picked your associate Diane Kossman to send an email to because
    > she had a lot to say in an email about CNOOC showing former Nexen
    > chief Kevin Reinhart the door. However nobody should deny that
    > Reinhart and many of his minions such as Kim Woima could not be
    > trusted or they would have informed the latest boss Fang Zhi and his
    > fellow CNOOC executives of my concerns about the actions and ethics of
    > foreign based companies and the exploitation of Canadian natural
    > resources before the Chinese opted to close the deal to buy Nexen.
    >
    > For the record I told your "Integrity" lady to Google my name and
    > Nexen. If she had bothered to do so she would have easily found some
    > emails of mine about Nexen posted within another fella's blog. She did
    > not wish to but did ask for the email that I had sent to DEFAIT that
    > you have studied as well.
    >
    > Now perhaps you folks at NEXEN should check out the emails I mentioned
    > on the phone. Within the following links an email to Kim Woima of
    > Nexen can be found.
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/01/howcome-you-said-nothing-when-i-backed.html
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/re-it-appears-that-wikileaks-iceland_9.html
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/07/harper-and-emera-will-know-why-i-am.html
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:03:50 -0300
    > Subject: Ask yourself why CBC would report none of this
    > To: kim_woima@nexeninc.com, "greg.weston"<greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
    > jack.tomik@cbc.ca, alan.dark@cbc.ca
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , jacques_poitras
    > <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
    >
    > You do know Landslide Annie is on the Board of Directors of Nexen I hope
    >
    > http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/08/20/f-scott-peterson-cnooc-nexen.html
    >
    >
    > http://www.nexeninc.com/en/Governance/BoardofDirectors/BoardBios.aspx
    >
    > I mean no disrepect to you Ms. Qi. In all sincerity I do thank you for
    > doing your job. The email above should finally start the ball rolling
    > in order to allow me to have a long talk with some officials within
    > the Chinese government and of course your boss Fang Zhi and his many
    > lawyers and beancounters. Correct?
    >
    >
    > Veritas Vincit
    > David Raymond Amos
    > 902 800 0369
    >
    > On 8/11/14, Qi, Mindy (Calgary) <Mindy.Qi@nexencnoocltd.com> wrote:
    >> Hi, Mr. Amos
    >>
    >> Thank you for your call today, and unfortunately, I can't hear you
    >> clearly
    >> over the phone.
    >>
    >> I took a little bit time to review the files you sent to us and tried to
    >> read the email string below, however, I got very confused on your purpose
    >> of
    >> the call and your email. Besides, your attached documents dated back to
    >> 2003
    >> and it contains large volume of information which I have no clue why you
    >> would like to contact Nexen.
    >>
    >> Would you please explain your background story and clarify what you hope
    >> Nexen can do for you in a simple way? So that I can see if I need to pass
    >> your case to any team leaders here. It will be very hard for me to bring
    >> your case to them if I don't know what we can do for you.
    >>
    >> Thank you!
    >>
    >> Mindy Qi, CHRP
    >> Logistics & Events Specialist
    >> Corporate Communications
    >>
    >> Nexen Energy ULC
    >> 801-7th Avenue S.W.
    >> Calgary,  AB, Canada T2P 3P7
    >> www.nexencnoocltd.com
    >>
    >> T: (403) 699-5232   ::   F: (403) 699-7512   ::   C: (403) 473-1929   ::
    >> E: mindy.qi@nexencnoocltd.com  ::   LinkedIn
    >>
    >>
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/re-it-appears-that-wikileaks-iceland_9.html
    >
    >
    > Sunday, 9 June 2013
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Re: It appears that Wikileaks, Iceland, Birgitta Jonsdottir and her
    > Pirate Party have no conscience whatsoever. I hoped I was wrong
    > However here is why I am not surprised
    >
    >
    >
    > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHk-UYZuXE4
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Henrik Palmgren <redicecreations@gmail.com>
    > Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 14:46:26 +0200
    > Subject: Re: Oh my my I guess we know the score on you EH?
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Oh my. Don't send me your spam. It's not good for anything.
    >
    > 2012/8/26 David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    >> On 8/25/12, Red Ice Creations <redicecreations@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> > Take me this list!
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > On 26 aug 2012, at 03:06, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> >
    >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> >> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:44:45 -0300
    >> >> Subject: I just called from 902 800 0369 Perhaps the Qatari Embassy
    >> >> should study the attachments closely EH Mr Alward?
    >> >> To: musoviczl@repsol.com, pribbeck@repsol.com,
    >> vcmorrissettem@repsol.com
    >> >> Cc: ottawa@mofa.gov.qa, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, David Amos
    >> >> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
    >> >> leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
    >> >>
    >> >> Qatari Embassy in Ottawa, Canada
    >> >> 800-150 Metcalfe Street
    >> >> Ottawa Ontario K2P 1P1
    >> >> Telephone (+1) 613 241 4917
    >> >> E-mail ottawa@mofa.gov.qa
    >> >> http://www.repsolenergy.com/rena_team/rena_team.html
    >> >>
    >> >> http://www.repsolenergy.com/press_room/press_room.html
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/kuwait-koweit/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/fs-qatar-fd.aspx?lang=eng&view=d
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> http://www.nccar.ca/statements/news-releases/establishment-of-the-embassy-of-qatar-in-canadaune-ambassade-du-qatar-a-ottawa/
    >> >>
    >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> >> From: Alan Dark <Alan.Dark@cbc.ca>
    >> >> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:57:14 -0400
    >> >> Subject: Re: I just called from 902 800 0369 and tried to talk to you
    >> >> Mr Tomick (Out of office)
    >> >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> >>
    >> >> Thank you for your email. Please be advised that I am currently out of
    >> >> the office; returning Monday Agust 27th.
    >> >>
    >> >> If your matter is urgent, please contact Camilla Inderberg at
    >> >> 416-205-5545 or by email camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca or Janice Smith
    >> >> 416-205-2940 or janice.smith@cbc.ca
    >> >>
    >> >> Best regards,
    >> >> Al
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> >> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:03:50 -0300
    >> >> Subject: Ask yourself why CBC would report none of this
    >> >> To: kim_woima@nexeninc.com, "greg.weston"<greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
    >> >> jack.tomik@cbc.ca, alan.dark@cbc.ca
    >> >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , jacques_poitras
    >> >> <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>
    >> >>
    >> >> You do know Landslide Annie is on the Board of Directors of Nexen I
    >> >> hope
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/08/20/f-scott-peterson-cnooc-nexen.html
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >> http://www.nexeninc.com/en/Governance/BoardofDirectors/BoardBios.aspx
    >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >> >> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:17:20 -0300
    >> >> Subject: Re Danny Williams Vs the Sierra Club Very Interesting lawsuit
    >> >> and counterclaim EH Mr Bennnett
    >> >> To: jb@sierraclub.ca, lgue@davidsuzuki.org, grenouf
    >> >> <grenouf@genuinewitty.com>, editor@theindependent.ca
    >> >> Cc: jbaker@ottenheimerbaker.com, info@alderonironore.com,
    >> >> ktsakumis@alderonironore.com, "pgleeson@alderonironore.com \"David
    >> >> Amos\""<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , jvettese@casselsbrock.com
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/125139-muskrat-falls-critic-countersues-williams
    >> >>
    >> >> http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/node/4542
    >> >>
    >> >> FYI I just call Bruno Marcocchio @ 902-567-1132 and he had no clue as
    >> >> to what I was talking about However trust that just like Gretchen
    >> >> Fitzgerald, Danny Williams and his corporate pals know EXACTLY who I
    >> >> am and why I was calling.
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> http://www.tmx.com/en/news_events/exchange_bulletins/bulletins/10-7-2011_TSX-NewListingADV.html
    >> >>
    >> >> http://alderonironore.com/corporate/board_directors/
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/05/nfld-whistleblower-dodges-libel-charge.html
    >> >>
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > To: <redicecreations@gmail.com>; "birgittaj"<birgittaj@althingi.is>;
    > "Piratar"<piratar@pirateparty.is>; "ed.pilkington"
    > <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>
    ; <janice.smith@cbc.ca>;
    > <camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca>; "david.akin"<david.akin@sunmedia.ca>;
    > <Alan.Dark@cbc.ca>; "newsonline"<newsonline@bbc.co.uk>
    > Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    ; "aih"<aih@cbc.ca>;
    > "news-tips"<news-tips@nytimes.com>
    > Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 5:49 PM
    > Subject: I wonder if the the bigtime bullshitter Henrik Palmgren even
    > remembers me I bet he still plays dumb just like YOU, Ed Pilkington,
    > the NYTimes, CNN, Sun Media, CBC and the BBC EH Birgitta?
    >
    >
    > http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2012/07/RIR-120722.php
    >
    > On 6/6/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/it-appears-that-wikileaks-iceland.html
    >>
    >> From: postur@irr.is
    >> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 08:23:00 +0000
    >> Subject: Re: It appears that Wikileaks, Iceland, Birgitta Jonsdottir
    >> and her Pirate Party have no conscience whatsoever. I hoped I was
    >> wrong However here is why I am not surprised
    >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
    >>
    >> Kveðja / Best regards
    >> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
    >>
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
    >
    >
    > Sunday, 18 May 2014
    >
    > Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen
    > Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP lawyer David Eby in BC or your
    > mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: postur@for.is
    > Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 02:03:05 +0000
    > Subject: Re: [Mogulegur Ruslpostur] Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook
    > Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP
    > lawyer David Eby in BC or your mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    >
    > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
    >
    > Kveðja / Best regards
    > Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: postur@irr.is
    > Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 02:03:06 +0000
    > Subject: Re: [Mogulegur Ruslpostur] Yo Birgitta Who is more of a crook
    > Julian Assange, the gay lawyer Glen Greenwald, the equally sneaky NDP
    > lawyer David Eby in BC or your mindless Prime Ministers of Iceland
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    >
    > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
    >
    > Kveðja / Best regards
    > Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
    > Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 06:12:37 -0600 (MDT)
    > Subject: Re: The BBC the Guardian the CBC, Brazil, Iceland, Canada
    > Pierre Omidyar, Glen Greenwald and all the other bigtime bullshitters
    > aka journalists may enjoy this blog but they will never write about it
    > N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Cc: interceptjobs <interceptjobs@theintercept.com>, David Amos
    > <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , SFeinman@fahrllc.com, ppalmater
    > <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca
    >, birgittaj <birgittaj@althingi.is>,
    > jamiebaillie@gov.ns.ca, bob rae <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net
    >,
    > nichor@parl.gc.ca, greg weston <greg.weston@cbc.ca>, Manon Hardy
    > <Manon.Hardy@priv.gc.ca>, Dion Mario <Dion.Mario@psic-ispc.gc.ca>,
    > csu@jesuits.ca, "George.Soros"
    > <George.Soros@opensocietyfoundations.org>, "george.osborne.mp"
    > <george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk>, henktep <henktep@nbnet.nb.ca>,
    > ambassador@brasilemb.org, postur <postur@for.stjr.is>, oldmaison
    > <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, lgunter
    > <lgunter@shaw.ca>, hmc <hmc@mediacoop.ca>, tips <tips@660news.com>,
    > news <news@thetelegraph.com.au>, tips <tips@gawker.com>, news919
    > <news919@rogers.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>, newsdesk
    > <newsdesk@theage.com.au>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "mckeen.randy"
    > <mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
    > <premier@gnb.ca>, Brian Gallant <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>,
    > "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "david.fraser"
    > <david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, Glen
    > Canning <grcanning@me.com>, john adams <john.adams@queensu.ca>,
    > "john.logan"<john.logan@gnb.ca>
    >
    > No one has ever "enjoyed this blog" David Amos sucks cock!
    >
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/re-snowdon-assangethe-dhs-rcm-pthe-cbc.html
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: postur@for.is
    > Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 12:42:06 +0000
    > Subject: Re: Re Snowdon Assangethe DHS the RCM Pthe CBC, Brazil
    > Iceland, the Guardian Pierre Omidyar, Glen Greenwald and all the other
    > bigtime bullshitters
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
    >
    > Kveðja / Best regards
    > Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: "OSBORNE, George"<george.osborne.mp@parliament.uk>
    > Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 12:36:36 +0000
    > Subject: Thank you for your e-mail
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thank you very much for your e-mail to George Osborne.
    >
    > Non- Tatton Residents
    > If you are contacting George in his capacity as Chancellor of the
    > Exchequer, please re-send your e-mail to
    > public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk<mailto:public.enquiries@hm-treasury.gov.uk>
    > Alternatively, write to The Correspondence & Enquiry Unit, HM
    > Treasury, 1 Horseguards Road, London, SW1A 2HQ or telephone 020 7270
    > 5000.
    >
    > Tatton Residents
    > Thank you for your email- this is simply an automated response to
    > acknowledge it. If you are one of George's Tatton constituents, please
    > ensure that you have included your full postal address and postcode,
    > so that we can identify you as a Tatton resident. Once we have
    > confirmed this then George will reply to your message.
    >
    > If you are unsure if George is your MP, you can check with your
    > postcode http://findyourmp.parliament.uk/
    >
    > The Tatton office, which is for constituent enquiries only, can be
    > reached on 01565 873037.
    >
    > If you are a personal contact of George's, your e-mail will be
    > forwarded accordingly.
    >
    > With kind regards,
    >
    >
    > Office of Rt Hon George Osborne MP
    > MP for Tatton
    > Chancellor of the Exchequer
    >  ______________________________
    __
    >
    > UK Parliament Disclaimer:
    > This e-mail is confidential to the intended recipient. If you have
    > received it in error, please notify the sender and delete it from your
    > system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or copying is not permitted.
    > This e-mail has been checked for viruses, but no liability is accepted
    > for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 09:03:20 -0300
    > Subject: Re Assange and the DND versus Mean Old Me
    > To: ryan.gallagher@theintercept.com
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > Trust that you and Snowden don't know the half of it I have a LOT
    > more INFO and that your pals in the CBC and the Guardian etc know it
    >
    > https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014/02/18/snowden-docs-reveal-covert-surveillance-and-pressure-tactics-aimed-at-wikileaks-and-its-supporters/
    >
    > Veritas Vincit
    > David Raymond Amos
    > 902 800 0389
    >
    >
    > From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
    > Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
    > Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
    > first email I ever sent you
    > To: David Amos
    >
    > dear Dave
    > i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
    > find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime
    >
    > thank you for bearing with me
    > i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
    > and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
    > the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
    > plus all the matters in relation to immi
    >
    > with oceans of joy
    > birgitta
    >
    > Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
    > not.
    >
    > Andre Gide
    >
    > Birgitta Jonsdottir
    > Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
    > http://this.is/birgittahttp://joyb.blogspot.com -
    > http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
    >
    >
    > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 23:05:48 -0300
    > Subject: Re Mean old me versus the incompetent Canadain Military
    > Police and Barry Winters a zionist who claims to be a former officer
    > To: media@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, Barry Winters
    > <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "Julian Assange)"<editor@wikileaks.org>,
    > Sheldon Day <gem3intucson@q.com>, whistleblower
    > <whistleblower@ctv.ca>, "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, brian
    > <brian@brian-macdonald.ca>, tracy <tracy@jatam.org>
    > Cc: mackay01 <mackay01@canada.com>, IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, LaytoJ
    > <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, danf <danf@danf.com>, "john.logan"
    > <john.logan@gnb.ca>
    >
    > ATTENTION
    >
    > Glenn Stannard Acting Chair
    > Military Police Complaints Commission
    > 270 Albert Street, 10th Floor
    > Ottawa, ON, K1P 5G8
    > Telephone: (613) 947-5625
    > Telephone Toll Free: 1 800 632-0566
    > Fax: (613) 947-5713
    > Fax Toll Free: 1 877 947-5713
    > e-mail: commission@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca
    >
    > Do you people have a lawyer with the balls to talk to me or must I sue
    > the CROWN first?
    >
    > Perhaps your snobby military lawyers should study every word of the
    > evil bastard's blog
    >
    > http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010_04_01_archive.html
    >
    > Furthermore Iggy's legal people should know this should be some sort
    > of Fucking Secret BULLSHIT to protect the reputations of many a
    > corrupt politician EH Mr Mindless Minister of Defence Petey Baby
    > MacKay??
    >
    > http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-does-amerika-truther-movment-god.html
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Haukur S Magnusson <haukur@grapevine.is>
    > Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 02:50:58 +0000
    > Subject: Re: OK allow me to be brief then Tell Julian Assange and your
    > bullshitting pals in Iceland to go fuck themselves
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >
    > Dude, I really have no idea who you are or why you are so upset with
    > this Julian person.
    >
    > Hope it all works out for you.
    >
    > Haukur
    >
    > On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:43 AM, David Amos wrote:
    >
    >> On 4/6/10, Haukur S Magnusson <haukur@grapevine.is> wrote:
    >>> Pardon me sir,
    >>>
    >>> why do you keep signing your crazy e-mails with a Reykjavík Grapevine
    >>> footer? It is disturbing, and we would appreciate it if you stopped
    >>> doing it.
    >>>
    >>> Also, if you want people to read what you have to say, make it less
    >>> long and all over the place.
    >>>
    >>> Thanks,
    >>>
    >>> Haukur S. Magnússon
    >>>
    >>> Editor // Reykjavík Grapevine
    >>> haukur@grapevine.is
    >>> Tel. (+354) 695-8158 / (+354) 540-3602
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:24 AM, David Amos wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> http://www.youtube.com/user/AndyCobbonUTube#p/u/14/dk4rBQDxOEE
    >>>>
    >>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010_04_01_archive.html
    >>>>
    >>>> This should be some sort of Fucking Secret BULLSHIT in order to
    >>>> protect the reputations of many a corrupt politician even a few
    >>>> Icelanders EH?
    >>>>
    >>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-does-amerika-truther-
    >>>> movment-god.html
    >>>>
    >>>> Friday, August 14, 2009
    >>>> What does Amerika, the "Truther" movment, "God" and retards have
    >>>> to do
    >>>> with Canada
    >>>>
    >>>> We do not have to worry about comment from Little Dean and
    >>>> Dave...they
    >>>> are to uneducated to understand most posts
    >>>>
    >>>> So have you seen them, been annoyed or insulted by them, have you
    >>>> smelled their disease? Have you ever crossed the "medicine line" and
    >>>> seen some Yank being taken into custody because he just has..."this
    >>>> constitutional right to bear arms"...in Canada. I remember years ago
    >>>> when the debate was on in Canada, about there being weapons of mass
    >>>> destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" demanded that Canada
    >>>> join
    >>>> into "the Coalition of the Willing.
    >>>>
    >>>> American "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for
    >>>> NOT
    >>>> buying into the US policy. At the time I was serving as a planner at
    >>>> NDHQ and with 24 other of my colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM
    >>>> HQ to
    >>>> be involved in the planning in the planning stages of the
    >>>> op....and to
    >>>> report to NDHQ, that would report to the PMO upon the merits of the
    >>>> proposed operation.
    >>>>
    >>>> There was never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites
    >>>> where there were deployed WMD. Coalition assets were more than
    >>>> sufficient for the initial strike and invasion phase but even at
    >>>> that
    >>>> point in the planning, we were concerned about the number of
    >>>> "boots on
    >>>> the ground" for the occupation (and end game) stage of an
    >>>> operation in
    >>>> Iraq.
    >>>>
    >>>> We were also concerned about the American plans for occupation plans
    >>>> of Iraq because they at that stage included no contingency for a
    >>>> handing over of civil authority to a vetted Iraqi government and
    >>>> bureaucracy. There was no detailed plan for Iraq being
    >>>> "liberated" and
    >>>> returned to its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan.
    >>>>
    >>>> This was contrary to the lessons of Vietnam but also to the military
    >>>> thought, that folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and
    >>>> others
    >>>> illucidated upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what
    >>>> conditions are to met before US troop can redeploy?
    >>>>
    >>>> Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very
    >>>> preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involment in an Iraq
    >>>> operation....History would prove them correct. The political
    >>>> preesure
    >>>> being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was
    >>>> onerus
    >>>>
    >>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
    >>>> military assets even moreso It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
    >>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantene
    >>>> operations
    >>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in
    >>>> Afghanistan
    >>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
    >>>> operation....
    >>>>
    >>>> The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian lives and
    >>>> liberal
    >>>> political capitial.. and the priority of which ....not
    >>>> neccessarily in
    >>>> that order. Essentially Canada detemined to stay out of Iraq,
    >>>> paid the
    >>>> price, of a larger role in Afghanistan to enable US military
    >>>> assets to
    >>>> redeploy to Iraq.
    >>>>
    >>>> The US op in Afghanistan evolved from a US op, to a UN op, to a
    >>>> NATO /
    >>>> ISAF op. NATO countries other than Canada and the UK shun combat
    >>>> operations in Afghanistan..their rules of deployment and engagement
    >>>> mitigate against NATO troops engaging the Taliban. By design I am
    >>>> quite sure.
    >>>>
    >>>> But now the American Iraq op, is a great success. The "surge"
    >>>> worked.
    >>>> But alas now 127 Canadian soldiers are dead. The 2011 deadline is
    >>>> coming nigh....and President Barak Obama and NATO want Canada to
    >>>> consider extending the deployment of Canadian troops. The motives
    >>>> are
    >>>> different. The US wants to... needs to, as matter of national
    >>>> security, to defeat insurgency in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Our
    >>>> European allies want Canada to remain and continue to "punch
    >>>> above its
    >>>> weight" so European soldiers do not have to actually fight or die.
    >>>>
    >>>> That begs a few questions: "Nations do not have friends, nations
    >>>> have
    >>>> interests" -Henry Kissinger. Is American national security re
    >>>> terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan compatable with Canadian
    >>>> national interests? If this country, Canada is going to be a
    >>>> continuing ally in "the war against terror"....should not our
    >>>> "friends
    >>>> and neighbours across the medicine line be more amenable in
    >>>> matters of
    >>>> trade, or just living up to their free trade agreements. If our
    >>>> "friends and neighbours" to the south want Canadians to fight
    >>>> side by
    >>>> side...maybe that 7 % Softwood lumber tariff was a mistake...or the
    >>>> buy American provision in the currant stimulus plan ought to be re
    >>>> thought.
    >>>>
    >>>> Our American "friends" give Israel roughly 3 billion dollars a
    >>>> year to
    >>>> be spent buying weapons systems from US defense contactors...to
    >>>> survive (both Israel and US defense industries) Perhaps US dollars
    >>>> should flow to Canada to buy weapons systems and patrol aircraft and
    >>>> naval platforms...after all, aren't we your "friends and allies"?
    >>>>
    >>>> There is nothing similar with American culture, and politics between
    >>>> Canada and the US. Canada evolved into nation status and the US,
    >>>> revolted violently. This difference in the means we became
    >>>> nations...has greatly defined who and what we are.
    >>>>
    >>>> Our American "friends" look upon Canada as cultural, economic and
    >>>> political satrap.... Now to their great consternation they are
    >>>> finding
    >>>> out... that is NOT the case . Nothing good came to Canada by way of
    >>>> America. The military "schewir punct" should be defense of our
    >>>> continental shelf and the arctic.
    >>>>
    >>>> Canada does need to stop shipping unrefined bitumen to the US and
    >>>> totally refine it here and start building a pipeline for bitumen to
    >>>> Canada's west coast to sell to Asian and the Chinese market. It is
    >>>> more than past time to understand ..our American "friends" are
    >>>> not our
    >>>> friends at all.
    >>>>
    >>>> Or else it is: Bend over here it comes again.....KY anyone?
    >>>> Posted by Seren at 11:27 AM
    >>>>
    >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>> From: Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
    >>>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 08:33:09 -0600
    >>>> Subject: Re: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks
    >>>> and
    >>>> British Banksters etc
    >>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >>>>
    >>>> Tuesday, April 6, 2010
    >>>> David Amos is a RCMP rat
    >>>> Police Constables the world over call informants...cocksuckers.
    >>>> David
    >>>> Raymond Amos is a RCMP rat, a cocksucker, and he admits it. Just a
    >>>> few days
    >>>> ago David Raymond Amos admit he informed on and gave evidence in a
    >>>> murder
    >>>> case involving Gillies Moreau.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> David Amos has never sued or blown the whistle on anyone. There
    >>>> is no
    >>>> citation of any case involving David Raymond Amos in the New York
    >>>> Law
    >>>> Reporting Service, Shepards, or the Mass. Law reporting society or
    >>>> for that
    >>>> matter any state citation reporting service anywhere...you the
    >>>> places
    >>>> lawyers go to precedents for their briefs.
    >>>>
    >>>> Wikileaks will have NOTHING to do with David Amos. DavidAmos
    >>>> routinely
    >>>> plagerizes wikileaks material and then says he had everything to do
    >>>> with its
    >>>> exposure. David Raymond Amos is not an "ethical whistle blower" he
    >>>> has no
    >>>> record of having any information regarding public corruption
    >>>> whatsoever.
    >>>>
    >>>> But David Raymond Amos has a record of being a rat! A snitch for
    >>>> the "feds"
    >>>> he claims to hate. His kids are rats and assets of the RCMP and FBI
    >>>> because
    >>>> they are low low level snitches that inform on the lower rungs of
    >>>> minor
    >>>> organized crime organizations.
    >>>>
    >>>> But David Raymond Amos is also a pedophile or a "skinner" and a
    >>>> "goof".....
    >>>>
    >>>> Time will eventually run out for David as it always does for rats
    >>>> and
    >>>> skinners. So much for being an "ethical whistleblower" eh!
    >>>> Posted by Seren at 7:07 AM
    >>>> ----- Original Message -----
    >>>> From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >>>> To: "whistleblower"<whistleblower@ctv.ca>; "Dan Fitzgerald"
    >>>> <danf@danf.net>; "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>; "Edith. Cody-
    >>>> Rice"
    >>>> <Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>; "Barry Winters"<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>;
    >>>> "eachtem"
    >>>> <eachtem@hotmail.com>; "danadurf"<danadurf@hotmail.com>; "dean Ray"
    >>>> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>; "dean"<dean@law.ualberta.ca>; "dean.law"
    >>>> <dean.law@mcgill.ca>; "Dean.Buzza"<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
    >>>> <kevin.Jackson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    >>>> Cc: <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "tracy"<tracy@jatam.org>;
    >>>> <David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>;
    >>>> "Richard Harris"<injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>
    >>>> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:06 PM
    >>>> Subject: Fwd: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland
    >>>> WikiLeaks and
    >>>> British Banksters etc
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >>>> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 01:58:58 -0300
    >>>> Subject: RE: The Reykjavík Grapevine Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks
    >>>> and
    >>>> British Banksters etc
    >>>> To: grapevine@grapevine.is,
    >>>> Cc: editor@wikileaks.org,
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r879_ZTqaY8
    >>>>
    >>>> From: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
    >>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
    >>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
    >>>>
    >>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
    >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
    >>>>
    >>>> More info http://immi.is/
    >>>>
    >>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
    >>>>
    >>>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>> To: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
    >>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G"Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
    >>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
    >>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
    >>>> something
    >>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
    >>>>
    >>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
    >>>>
    >>>> Then read on and chuckle
    >>>>
    >>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
    >>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
    >>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
    >>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
    >>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>>
    >>>> Dear David Amos
    >>>>
    >>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
    >>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
    >>>> office.
    >>>>
    >>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
    >>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
    >>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
    >>>>
    >>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
    >>>>
    >>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
    >>>>
    >>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
    >>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
    >>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
    >>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>>
    >>>> David Raymond Amos
    >>>>
    >>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
    >>>> waits attendance.
    >>>>
    >>>> Thank you.
    >>>>
    >>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
    >>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
    >>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
    >>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
    >>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
    >>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
    >>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
    >>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
    >>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
    >>>>
    >>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
    >>>> letter ASAP EH?
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
    >>>>
    >>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
    >>>>
    >>>> Veritas Vincit
    >>>> David Raymond Amos
    >>>>
    >>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
    >>>> Hafnarstræti 15
    >>>> 101 Reykjavík
    >>>> Iceland
    >>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
    >>>> +354-540-3600
    >>>
    >>>
    >
    >
    >
    > https://firstlook.org/theintercept/staff/ryan-gallagher/
    >
    > Ryan Gallagher is a Scottish journalist whose work at The Intercept is
    > focused on government surveillance, technology, and civil liberties.
    > His journalism has appeared in publications including Slate
    >


    Mayor / Maire, St. George
    # Seats to elect / No. de sièges à élire : 1
    Candidate / Candidat(e)         Votes   Incumbent / Sortant(e)  Sex / Sexe
            Elected / Élu(e)
    John DETORAKIS  222             M       E
    Sharon E. TUCKER        197             F       
    Faith AVERY     137     inc./sort.      F       
    Councillor / Conseiller(ère), St. George
    # Seats to elect / No. de sièges à élire : 6
    Candidate / Candidat(e)         Votes   Incumbent / Sortant(e)  Sex / Sexe
            Elected / Élu(e)
    Barbara Ann RAYNER      303             F       E
    Sam RUBIN       299             M       E
    Brenda ALLISON  286     inc./sort.      F       E
    Alexa DETORAKIS         282             F       E
    Leslie ARMSTRONG        281             F       E
    Nancy M. COULTON        237             F       E
    Gil BREAU       235             M       
    Sterling P. HARRIS      222             M       
    David E. HOOPER         208             M       
    Archie LESLIE   182             M       
    Brooke BACHER   162             F       

    St. George
    St. George
    Position to fill        # Positions to fill     # Candidates    Status
    Mayor   1       3       (Election)
    Councillor      6       12      (Election)


    St. George
    Name    Sex     Contact Information
    Mayor  (1 to elect)
    Faith Avery
    (inc./sort.)    F       Address for service: 12 rue Carleton St, St. George, NB , E5C 3B5
    Telephone: 506-321-0453
    E-mail: faith.e.avery@gmail.com
    John Detorakis  M       Address for service: 88 ch Mount Pleasant Rd, St.
    George, NB , E5C 3K6
    Telephone: (506)754-0324
    E-mail: detorakisjohn@gmail.com
    Website: facebook.com/detorakisformayor/
    Sharon E. Tucker        F       Address for service: 26 Harvest Lane , St. George,
    NB , E5C 0C5
    Telephone: 506-754-6151
    E-mail: sharontucker2018@gmail.com
    Councillor  (6 to elect)
    Brenda Allison
    (inc./sort.)    F       Address for service: 4 av Clark Ave, St. George, NB , E5C 3C3
    Telephone: 506-754-3124
    E-mail: bcba@rogers.com
    Leslie Armstrong        F       Address for service: 50 av Riverview Ave, St.
    George, NB , E5C 3M6
    Telephone: 506-755-0755
    E-mail: lesliekarenarmstrong@gmail.com
    Website: www.thermalxray.com
    Brooke Bacher   F       Address for service: 12 rue Trynor St, St. George, NB , E5C 3N9
    Telephone: 506-222-0010
    E-mail: bbacher31@gmail.com
    Gil Breau       M       Address for service: 66 rue Carleton St, St. George, NB , E5C 3C1
    E-mail: gil.breau@gmail.com
    Website: www.facebook.com/gilbreauforcouncil/
    Nancy M. Coulton        F       Address for service: 6 rue Prince William St, St.
    George, NB , E5C 3L8
    Telephone: 506-755-2944
    E-mail: coultonnm@hotmail.com
    Alexa Detorakis F       Address for service: 88 ch Mount Pleasant Rd, St.
    George, NB , E5C 3K6
    E-mail: detorakis.a@gmail.com
    Website: facebook.com/AlexaDetorakisforCouncil/
    Sterling P. Harris      M       Address for service: 15 crois Armstrong Cres, St.
    George, NB , E5C 1A1
    Telephone: 506-755-0615
    David E. Hooper M       Address for service: 8 Hillcrest Dr , St. George, NB , E5C 3G1
    E-mail: hoop@nbnet.nb.ca
    Archie Leslie   M       Address for service: 96 ch Mount Pleasant Rd, St.
    George, NB , E5C 3K6
    Telephone: 506-755-8971
    E-mail: dararcleslie@gmail.com
    Cynthia Macpherson      F       Address for service: 13 Henry Lane , St. George,
    NB , E5C 3R9
    Telephone: 506-467-6870
    E-mail: macpherson_cynthia@yahoo.com
    Barbara Ann Rayner      F       Address for service: 7 ch Pancake Hill Rd, St.
    George, NB , E5C 3K8
    Telephone: 506-755-2788
    E-mail: barbarayn22@gmail.com
    Sam Rubin       M       Address for service: 33 ch Mount Pleasant Rd, St. George,
    NB , E5C 3K3
    Telephone: 506-755-8985
    Cynthia MACPHERSON      124             F

     
     
     
     

    Yo Stéphane Robichaud as the CEO of the New Brunswick Health Council you must know Linda Duffett-Leger

    $
    0
    0

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 16:59:01 -0300
    Subject: Yo Stéphane Robichaud as the CEO of the New Brunswick Health
    Council you must know Linda Duffett-Leger Perhaps you should Google
    her name and mine
    To: stephane.robichaud@nbhc.ca, lduffett@unb.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    https://nbhc.ca/council-members

    Linda Duffet-Leger
    Past Council Member
    September 2008 - August 2011

    Here just one example

    http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/10/rcmp-david-raymond-amos.html

    Wednesday, October 29, 2008
    The RCMP & David Raymond Amos

    CC: ken.cook@fredericton.ca; John.Foran@gnb.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
    injusticecoalition@hotmail.com; danf@danf.net; wally.stiles@gnb.ca;
    kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca; brad.green@gnb.ca

    Mr Amos,

    I would like you to stop sending me your emails. I am not sure who or
    what you have a complaint with nor am I interested. I am certain that
    it does not involve me. Further emails will be considered harassment.

    Sincerely,

    Linda Duffett-Leger

    Linda Duffett-Leger, MN, BN, RN, BA

    Project Director, MOMS Study

    CHILD Research Program, http://www.unbf.ca/nursing/child/index.html

    UNB Nursing Faculty, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, N.B., E3B 5A3


    ----- Original Message ----
    From: David Amos
    To: menard@nbnet.nb.ca; t.j.burke@gnb.ca; police@fredericton.ca;
    day.s@parl.gc.ca; jonesr@cbc.ca; danny.copp@fredericton.ca;
    lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca; Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca;
    Walter.Lee@yorkvilleu.ca; lduffett@unb.ca; jsadler@nb.sympatico.ca;
    jmbuckleycc@nb.aibn.com; rick.rice@gnb.ca; rgbernier@hotmail.com;
    Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca; Moore.R@parl.gc.ca;
    warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    Cc: ken.cook@fredericton.ca; John.Foran@gnb.ca; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
    Richard Harris ; Dan Fitzgerald ; wally.stiles@gnb.ca;
    kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca; brad.green@gnb.ca
    Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 5:12:49 PM
    Subject: Need I say Bullshit about what the Irvings have to say about
    anything? FYI Ms. Menard The RCMP were contacted twice about you and I
    The GRC dudes just played dumb and hostile as usaual. so I told them
    what i told you on the phone Cya'll in court.

    After all Murder is still a capital crime correct?

    Subject:
    Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
    From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
    To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com


    January 30, 2007

    WITHOUT PREJUDICE

    Mr. David Amos

    Dear Mr. Amos:

    This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
    2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.

    Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
    taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
    Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton.

    Sincerely,

    Honourable Michael B. Murphy
    Minister of Health

    CM/cb

    Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:

    Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
    From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
    nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
    motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,
    John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,
    "Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
    forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n

    Dear Mr. Amos,

    Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over
    the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not
    ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.

    As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
    is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
    testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
    Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
    services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
    instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.

    As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
    imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
    that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and
    theUS. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing
    in Petitcodiac, NB.

    It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
    December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.

    Sincerely,

    Warren McBeath, Cpl.
    GRC Caledonia RCMP
    Traffic Services NCO
    Ph: (506) 387-2222
    Fax: (506) 387-4622
    E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

    Say Hoka Hey to your snotty hubby the latest publisher of the Kings
    County Record. wiil ya?

    Perhaps he and you buddies in Kings county should review what
    his/Irvings paper wrote about me four god damned years ago. You will
    find that article within a blog of chucky Leblanc's that he had Goggle
    delete. It is within an email that his editor sent to a reporter and I
    in the USA before I ran for a seat in Parliament again. Never forget
    my words are legally published int the USA according to its
    Consitution. Scotty editor sent her email to me in the USA and to a
    fellow reporter too. Whereas you are just a criminal lawer in New
    Brunswick I doubt that you have a licence to argue civil lawsuits in
    the USA. Perhaps you should find a lawyer now EH Ms. Menard? Why not
    ask the Irving's new sorta son in law who replaced Paul Zed (the
    lawyer in New York or whereever) to take me on?

    Veritas vincit

    David Raymond amos

    Veritas Vincit

    David Raymond Amos

    First the Irving's Rags write this about the doings between T.J. Burke
    and I last year. have my blog and emails killed then sing your praises
    about your legal Bullshit next year? Have alook for yourself lady

    Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 07:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
    From: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    Subject: Who says they are ignoring me Chucky? Ask Barry McKnight why
    the Yankees are researching him
    To: news@dailygleaner.com, kcarmichael@bloomberg.net,
    oldmaison@yahoo.com, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
    Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca,
    info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
    police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
    Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
    Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
    Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
    CC: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, whalen@fredericton.ca,
    david.kelly@fredericton.ca, cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca,
    stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca, tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca,
    scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca, marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca,
    walter.brown@fredericton.ca, norah.davidson@fredericton.ca,
    mike.obrien@fredericton.ca, bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca,
    dan.keenan@fredericton.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
    mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
    jlmockler@mpor.ca, scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca,
    jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca

    Just Dave
    By Location Visit Detail
    Visit 1,013
    Domain Name (Unknown)
    IP Address 206.15.101.# (NEWS CORPORATION)
    ISP NEWS CORPORATION
    Location Continent : North America
    Country : United States (Facts)
    State : New York
    City : New York
    Lat/Long : 40.7605, -73.9933 (Map)
    Language English (U.S.)
    en-us
    Operating System Microsoft Win2000
    Browser Firefox 2.0
    Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.3)
    Gecko/20070309 Firefox/2.0.0.3
    Javascript version 1.5
    Monitor Resolution : 800 x 600
    Color Depth : 32 bits
    Time of Visit May 23 2007 6:17:17 pm
    Last Page View May 23 2007 6:17:17 pm
    Visit Length 0 seconds
    Page Views 1
    Referring URL http://www.google.co...%22barry mcknight%22
    Search Engine google.com
    Search Words fredericton police department "barry mcknight"
    Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
    Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
    Out Click
    Time Zone UTC-5:00
    Visitor's Time May 23 2007 5:17:17 pm
    Visit Number 1,013


    charles leblanc oldmaison@yahoo.com wrote:

    Where are ya living now???? Since the media seem to ignore ya? I'll
    sit down for a debate with a recorder for the blog...Now? Don't get
    all exicted and send this all over the world.....lol

    ----- Original Message ----
    From: David Amos motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    To: brad.woodside@fredericton.ca; whalen@fredericton.ca;
    david.kelly@fredericton.ca; cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca;
    stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca; tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca;
    scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca; marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca;
    walter.brown@fredericton.ca; norah.davidson@fredericton.ca;
    mike.obrien@fredericton.ca; bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca;
    dan.keenan@fredericton.ca; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca;
    mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca;
    jlmockler@mpor.ca; scotta@parl.gc.ca; michael.bray@gnb.ca;
    jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
    Cc: news@dailygleaner.com; kcarmichael@bloomberg.net;
    oldmaison@yahoo.com; advocacycollective@yahoo.com;
    Easter.W@parl.gc.ca; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca; cityadmin@fredericton.ca;
    info@gg.ca; bmosher@mosherchedore.ca; rchedore@mosherchedore.ca;
    police@fredericton.ca; chebert@thestar.ca; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca;
    Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca; Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca; alltrue@nl.rogers.com;
    Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca;
    Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
    Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:37:04 PM
    Subject: I promised one of the Fat Fred City cop Randy Reilly that I
    would try to make him famous

    http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=davidraymondamos&search=Search

    A man is only as good as his word EH? To bad priests, bankers,
    politicians, lawyers and cops can't claim the same N'est Pas

    http://actionlyme.org/FBI_WIRETAPE_TAPES.htm

    http://davidamos.blogspot.com/

    Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
    From: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    Subject: Now everybody and his dog knows TJ Burke and his cop buddies
    allegations against me are false and you had the proof all along EH
    Chucky?
    To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbombud@gnb.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca,
    jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, news@dailygleaner.com,
    kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, advocacycollective@yahoo.com,
    Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, cityadmin@fredericton.ca,
    info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca,
    police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca,
    Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, alltrue@nl.rogers.com,
    Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca,
    Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca
    CC: dgleg@nb.aibn.com, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca,
    whalen@fredericton.ca, david.kelly@fredericton.ca,
    cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca, stephen.kelly@fredericton.ca,
    tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca, scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca,
    marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca, walter.brown@fredericton.ca,
    norah.davidson@fredericton.ca, mike.obrien@fredericton.ca,
    bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca, dan.keenan@fredericton.ca,
    jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca,
    cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, jlmockler@mpor.ca,
    scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca, jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca
    http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/05/24/nb-burkethreat.html

    http://www.canadaeast.com/ce2/docroot/article.php?articleID=149018

    http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2007/05/tj-burke-walking-around-with-rcmp.html

    http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2006/06/fapo-has-meeting-about-panhanding.html

    http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/2007/05/hats-off-to-cbc-reporter-jacques.html

    http://maritimes.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=9856

    Methinks your liberal pals just made a major faux pas N'est Pas?
    Scroll down Frenchie and go down?.

    Threat against Burke taken seriously

    By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN
    dgleg@nb.aibn.com
    Published Thursday May 24th, 2007
    Appeared on page A1
    An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and
    Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him
    recently.

    Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't
    explain the nature of the threats.

    "I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made
    specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told reporters
    Wednesday.

    "The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me to a
    couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside or
    have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have some
    added protection and that added comfort."

    The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP security unit.

    Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have
    been in recent weeks.

    "When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you have
    to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said.
    "But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my own
    personal safety."

    Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed his
    pattern of activity.

    "It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife feel awful nervous."

    Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a
    lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick.

    "(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure my
    family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in general due
    to my background and training.

    "I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had to happen."

    Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security concerns.

    "We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where threats
    have to be taken pretty seriously," he said.

    Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001,
    security in New Brunswick has been
    beefed up.

    Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all
    visitors are screened.

    The position of attorney general is often referred to as the
    province's "top cop."

    Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role as
    the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually
    prosecutes them.

    "With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had numerous
    threats since Day 1 in office."

    Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do with it.

    "I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a matter
    and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them
    their punishment or their sanction," he said.

    Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated?

    "I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied.

    Reporters asked when the threat would be over.

    "I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said
    Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source."

    Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative government,
    said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not
    complimentary."

    "I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the security
    of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch.

    "They look at each and every situation."

    Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former
    premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did
    have extra security staff assigned on occasion.

    He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with the RCMP.
    Group studies its legal options
    Early immersion | Reversal of decision wanted ASAP

    By JENNIFER DUNVILLE
    dunville.jennifer@dailygleaner.com

    Published Tuesday April 8th, 2008

    Appeared on page A1
    A lobby group opposed
    Posted by Richard A. Harris at 7:50 PM
    1 comment:

    David Raymond Amos said...

        So did I guess correctly Richy Baby?

        From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
        Subject: Yo "Blogger General" Burke Whats with your Blogger
    constituant Richy Baby? Is there still something wrong with the whole
    truth?
        To: "t.j.burke@gnb.ca"t.j.burke@gnb.ca, "Richard Harris"
    injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, "robin reid"zorroboy@live.com,
    "richard. dearden"richard.dearden@gowlings.com, "Byron Prior"
    alltrue@nl.rogers.com, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
    "brad. woodside"brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, "byron. james"
    byron.james@gnb.ca, "Byrne. G"Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca, "webo"
    webo@xplornet.com, "we"leader@greenparty.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
    oldmaison@yahoo.com
        Cc: "Paul.Harpelle"Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca, "checkup"
    checkup@cbc.ca, "Chris. Baker"Chris.Baker@gnb.ca, "tim4nm"
    tim4nm@gmail.com, "tim. porter"Tim.Porter@gnb.ca
        Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 6:19 AM


        I must say this is quite ablog but he slects what he chooses to reveal
        and about who received what. Is Richy Baby making a deal with you
    in private T.J. Baby???

        http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/10/rcmp-david-raymond-amos.html

        Wednesday, October 29, 2008
        The RCMP & David Raymond Amos

     

    https://nbhc.ca/staff-members/stephane-robichaud

    Chief Executive Officer
    photo Stéphane Robichaud
    Since:

    stephane.robichaud@nbhc.ca

    Photo Mathieu Picard
    Since:

    New Brunswick Health Council
    Pavillon J.-Raymond-Frenette
    50 de la Francophonie Street, Suite 2200
    Moncton, N.B. E1A 7R1

    (Note: de la Francophonie Street is located off of Crowley Farm road)

    Phone: (506) 869-6870
    (between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.)
    Toll-free:1-877-225-2521
    Fax: (506) 869-6282
    Email: info@nbhc.ca

     

     

    https://saintjohn.cioc.ca/record/HDC0390

     

    Contact Information
    Office PhoneMoncton: 506-857-8242
    Toll Free Phone1-800-453-4333
    Fax506-857-0315
    E-Mailhorizons@nbnet.nb.ca
    Websitewww.nbscf.ca/
    Primary ContactAlphonse Dionne, Provincial President, NBSCF-FCANB; Phone: 1-506-381-3525; Email: dionnealphonse@gmail.com
    Alternate ContactLise Guignard, Office manager, NBSCF-FCANB; Phone: 1-800-453-4333 * (506)857-8242; Fax: (506)857-0315; Email: horizons@nbnet.nb.ca
    Mailing Addressc/o NBSCF-FCANB 
    Box 23 
    Codiac Plaza 
    451 Paul St, Suite 209G 
    Dieppe, NB 
    Canada E1A 6W8
    Description & Services
    Description of service(s)The New Brunswick Senior Citizens' Federation's mission is to enhance the well being of New Brunswick Senior Citizens.
    HoursMonday to Friday 8:30am-4:30pm (lunch from noon to 1:00pm) 
    Closed on Fridays from June 28th to August 30th (summer only)
    Areas ServedNew Brunswick ; Throughout the province
    EligibilityAges: 50 year(s) and up
    Applicationcall the office for membership or lotto ticker purchases
    LanguagesEnglish ; French
    FeesMembership ; Membership $20 individual, $30 couple or $13 through a seniors' club near you

     

     

    https://kwaranuj.org.ng/paula-deen-jkm/public-health-nb-contact-number-90ae58

     

    NIGERIA UNION OF JOURNALISTS

    public health nb contact number

    165 St. Andrew Street, 2nd Floor Read verified and trustworthy customer reviews for New Brunswick Public Health … Programs and services are provided in both official languages. 506-523-7607, Sackville Contact the Auckland Regional Public Health Service: Street address: Cornwall Complex Building 15 40 Claude Road Greenlane Auckland 1023: Waikato Public Health Unit; Districts covered: Waikato, Ruapehu (Northern part) Postal address: Population Health Services Waikato District Health Board Private Bag 3200 Hamilton 3240: Phone (questionnaire) Public Health Ontario. Executive Director, Citizen EngagementPhone: (506) 869-6728Fax: (506) 462-2068Email: frank.vandenburg@nbhc.ca, New Brunswick Health Council 2A Shaffer Lane Blackville, NB E9B 1P4. New Brunswick has reported a total of 1,431 … Tracadie NB Social media. Three patients are hospitalized and two are in intensive care. COVID-19 information line: 1-833-784-4397 Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates . Facility Details. 506-735-2065, Grand Falls 506-336-3061, Tracadie To obtain health-care services, you will need a New Brunswick Medicare card Medicare covers most medically required services, and your card is a key piece of identification. 480 University Ave, Suite 300, Toronto, ON 2 - Singhal Sonica - Public Health Dentist - Health Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention Program Harkirat Singh New Brunswick Coronavirus. Public health emergencies (after hours, public holidays) 7. There have been 28 deaths, and the number of active cases is 35. Since yesterday, 9 people have recovered for a total of 1,360 recoveries. 8 Main Street,  You can contact Public Health Services in Fredericton, NB for more information. 506-364-4080, Shediac For up-to-date numbers of confirmed cases visit the Government of New Brunswick , the provincial dashboard's site , and the Public Health Agency of Canada (Canada). Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. Public Health Dentist Health Promotion, Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention Program 647-260-7680. sonica.singhal@oahpp.ca. Edmundston NB Public Health nurses and dietitians provide health care, educational and support services in daycares, in schools, at home, in the community and in the Public Health offices. E1A 7R1, (Note: de la Francophonie Street is located off of Crowley Farm road). Important Notice: All Public Health offices are closed to drop-in visitors. They work with individuals, families, groups and communities and are sensitive to cultural diversity. Public Health Inquiries: 306-766-7790 Childhood Immunization Inquiries: 306-766-7500 Travel and Special Population Immunization Inquiries: 306-766-7904: Rosetown: 306-882-2672 Ext. Moncton, N.B. This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions. 506-547-2062, Campbellton Middlesex County Public Health Department Contact Information. Shediac NB Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey, 2018 ACS 5-Year Estimates . 1. The number of confirmed cases in New Brunswick is 1,428. 131 Pleasant Street, 2nd Floor Moncton NB For an appointment with Public Health, please call a Public Health office near you. HSELive general health service information line is open 9am - 5pm Monday to Friday HSELive Coronavirus Helpline is open 8am to 8pm Monday to Friday and 9am - 5pm Saturday and Sunday 1850 24 1850 or 01 240 8787 In addition to engaging with and reporting to New Brunswickers, the NBHC makes annual recommendations to the Minister of Health. Locate and compare Public Health in Neguac NB, Yellow Pages Local Listings. Address, Phone Number, and Hours for Middlesex County Public Health Department, a Health Department, at Bayard Street, New Brunswick … Please consult with the NB Recovery Plan and Mandatory Order for the The number of confirmed cases in New Brunswick is 1,453. Yesterday, 1,642 … February 4, 2021 Public Health New Brunswick Page 4 of 4 to all public health safety protocols and are mentioned in their Operational Plan. : 647-260-7100 Toll Free: 1-877-543-8931 communications@oahpp.ca If you have a question or comment about our mandate, our work or the quality of our data, please use the form below and we’ll get back to you. The case in Zone 1 (Moncton region) is an individual 20-29. Contact Us If you have a question or comment about our mandate, our work or the quality of our data, please use the form below and we’ll get back to you. Purchasing information for suppliers and vendors 6. Contact us via email 4. Public Health - Richibucto - phone number, website & address - NB - . Find everything you need to know about Public Health on Yellowpages.ca Please enter what you're searching for Head Office 661 University Avenue, Suite 1701 Toronto, ON, M5G 1M1. The Public Health Act and regulations Public Health services in New Brunswick offer a number of programs designed to support a healthy start for young children and their families. The Public Health Act and regulations 506-533-3354, Shippagan They work with individuals, families, groups and communities and are sensitive to cultural diversity. Staff directory 2. 1297 Church Hill, Suite 102 New Braunfels, Texas 78130 Yesterday, 1,642 … Kedgwick NB Public Health Inquiries: 306-766-7790 Childhood Immunization Inquiries: 306-766-7500 Travel and Special Population Immunization Inquiries: 306-766-7904: Rosetown: 306-882-2672 Ext. Offices – Public Health Sudbury & Districts (Chapleau, Espanola, Manitoulin Island, Sudbury East, Greater Sudbury) 3. The Healthy Families- Healthy Babies program focuses on early child development and parenting capacity; prenatally and postnatally. Public Health offices Call 811 to speak with a nurse at all times. 342 Main Street, Unit 360 295 Saint-Pierre Boulevard West Directions to Public Health Office. Grand Falls NB FREDERICTON — New Brunswick is reporting one new case of COVID-19 today. Find useful information, the address and the phone number of the local business you are looking for. Pavillon J.-Raymond-Frenette Gauthier Boulevard Since yesterday, four people have recovered for a total of 1,389 recoveries. 81 Albert Street Campbellton NB 1. Find New Brunswick Population of People With Disabilities, Population by Disability Type, Public Health Insurance Coverage, and Private Health Insurance Coverage. Phone number: 1-866-626-4862. for 1+3, enter 4. for publications, indicators and other content, School districts, Educational sectors & NB, School districts, educational sectors & NB, In Balance: Report on Child and Youth Mental Health, Results from 2019 edition of Acute Care Survey, In Balance - Balancing Treatment and Prevention for Better Child and Youth Mental Health. From: Public Health Agency of Canada. 116-G Notre-Dame Street The case is travel related and is self-isolating. The New Brunswick Health Council (NBHC) was created by legislation in 2008 to report publicly on the performance of the provincial health system and to engage citizens in the improvement of health services quality. 506-284-3422, Moncton Booked appointments will proceed. Programs and services are provided in both official languages. Media inquiries related to public health issues 5. Find New Brunswick Population of People With Disabilities, Population by Disability Type, Public Health Insurance Coverage, and Private Health Insurance Coverage. New Brunswick. In those cases, using for example a 200% federal poverty level, you will only need double the 100% number listed above to 200%. Bathurst NB There have been 28 deaths, and the number of active cases is 35. Gradual resumption of services during the pandemic, New Brunswick Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) Centre of Excellence, Guide and recipes for introducing solid foods, Sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections, Quality, Patient Safety and Performance Improvement, Improvements to Vitalité Health Network's infrastructures, Healthy Families, Healthy Babies (Early Childhood Initiatives), Sexually transmitted and blood borne infections. Since yesterday, four people have recovered for a total of 1,389 recoveries. Tel. These teams can as… Measures of population health, health system quality, and related information, Measures of hospital patient care experience. The Healthy Families- Healthy Babies program focuses on early child development and parenting capacity; prenatally and postnatally. Covid-19 Information Phone: (506) 869-6870 506-856-2401, Richibucto Address, Phone Number, and Hours for Middlesex County Public Health Department, a Health Department, at Bayard Street, New Brunswick NJ. 6 Arran Street, 1st Floor 506-394-3888. Phone: (506) 869-6870(between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.)Toll-free:1-877-225-2521Fax: (506) 869-6282Email: info@nbhc.ca, Frank Vandenburg © Vitalité Health Network. We can all do our part in preventing the spread of COVID-19. For up-to-date numbers of confirmed cases visit the Government of New Brunswick , the provincial dashboard's site , and the Public Health Agency of Canada (Canada). The provincial government has partnered with the Association of New Brunswick Land Surveyors to provide more accurate and up-to-date mapping of property lines for landowners. ... 530 New Brunswick Ave Perth Amboy, NJ - … Call 811 to speak with a nurse at all times. In New Brunswick, Public Health is closely monitoring the spread of COVID-19. 311 Canada New Brunswick Department of Health - Public Health Contact Tracing Information All positive COVID-19 cases are reported to the appropriate regional public health office. Bathurst Horizon Health Network Woodbridge Centre 180 Woodbridge Street Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 4R3 Telephone: 506-623-5500 Click here to email us. In order to obtain actual costs please contact Middlesex County Public Health Department directly. Hours of operation are from 7 a.m. to midnight EST. Public Health services in New Brunswick offer a number of programs designed to support a healthy start for young children and their families. If you have been instructed by public health to quarantine for any other reason (for example, you have been in close contact with a case), inform your local public health authority of your status as an essential worker and follow their directions. Read verified and trustworthy customer reviews for New Brunswick Public Health … 121 De l’Église Street, Suite 330 There are 36 active reported cases in the province and two people are hospitalized with the disease, both in intensive care. 506-475-2441, Kedgwick Fredericton Area 506-452-5400 Miramichi Area 506-623-3000 Moncton Area 506-857-5111 Saint John Area 506-648-6000 Upper River Valley Area 506-375-5900 Subscribe to our e-newsletter! 3520 Principale Street The number of confirmed cases in New Brunswick is 1,453. Facebook @GovNB; Twitter @Gov_NB; Instagram @gnbca; Phone number: 811. Call 811 to speak with a nurse at all times. Middlesex County Public Health Department Contact Information. Three patients are hospitalized and two are in intensive care. Tele-Care 811 Tele-Care is a free, confidential, health advice and information line. Find everything you need to know about Public Health on Yellowpages.ca Please enter what you're searching for Bathurst 165 St. Andrew Street, 2nd Floor Bathurst NB 506-547-2062 Campbellton 6 Arran Street, 1st Floor Campbellton NB 506-789-2266 Caraquet 295 Saint-Pierre Boulevard West Caraquet NB 506-726-2025 Edmundston 121 De l’Église Street, Suite 330 25 Cartier Boulevard, Unit 153 Health officials say the new case involves a person in their 30s in the Miramichi region, about 175 kilometres northeast of Fredericton. To obtain health-care services, you will need a New Brunswick Medicare card Medicare covers most medically required services, and your card is a key piece of identification. New Brunswick Public Health – Company in Woodstock, NB – 200 King Street, Woodstock, New Brunswick. Dial 1 Plus the Number 5064532830 from outside Fredericton. In New Brunswick, Public Health is closely monitoring the spread of COVID-19. The NBHC consists of twelve citizen members from around the province, with staff located in Moncton. Seven previously reported cases are now considered recovered, as the number … New Brunswick Public Health is reporting four new cases of COVID-19 on Friday. Tele-Care 811 Tele-Care is a free, confidential, health advice and information line. Interpretation service available in 200+ languages. Public Health was the first non-military government health service in New Brunswick, with the first Public Health Act being passed in 1796, even before the creation of a Department of Health. Public Health reported one new case of COVID-19 today. Location: Address Telephone: Fax: Blackville: 2 Shaffer Lane Blackville, NB E9B 1P4: 506-843-2956: 506-843-2911: Boiestown: 6154 Route 8, Unit 1 Boiestown, NB E6A 1M4

    Andrew Cohen a professor at Carleton University claims Trump is addicted to chaos

    $
    0
    0
    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 17:48:10 +0000
    Subject: RE: YO Andrew Cohen Donald J. Trump asking for my input about Fake News
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Duclos, Jean-Yves - Député"<Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca>
    Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 17:46:16 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Andrew Cohen Donald J. Trump asking for
    my input about Fake News
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Bonjour,

    Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de l'hon.
    Jean-Yves Duclos, député fédéral de Québec.

    Ce courriel confirme la réception de votre correspondance.

    Veuillez prendre note que votre demande sera traitée dans les meilleurs délais.

    Salutations distinguées,

    Bureau de circonscription de Jean-Yves Duclos

    ________________________________

    Hello,

    Thank you for contacting the office of Jean-Yves Duclos, M.P for Québec.

    This email confirms the receipt of your message.

    Please note that your request will be processed as soon as possible.

    With our best regards,

    The riding office of Jean-Yves Duclos



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<Chrystia.Freeland@fin.gc.ca>
    Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 17:46:23 +0000
    Subject: Department of Finance  / Ministère des Finances
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    comments.
    Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
    any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
    on Canada’s COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
    Government of Canada website at www.canada.ca/coronavirus or by
    calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

    Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
    Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
    En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
    que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
    Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d’intervention
    économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
    le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au www.canada.ca/coronavirus ou
    en composant le 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 17:48:25 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Andrew Cohen Donald J. Trump asking for
    my input about Fake News
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

    If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
    support, please contact our Customer Service department at
    1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

    If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
    publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

    Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

    This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
    press releases.





    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2021 14:46:10 -0300
    Subject: YO Andrew Cohen Donald J. Trump asking for my input about Fake News
    To: contact@win.donaldjtrump.com, Andrew.Cohen@carleton.ca,
    journalism@carleton.ca, dfenton@postmedia.com, cspencer@postmedia.com,
    djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>, stephen.kimber@ukings.ca,
    "fin.minfinance-financemin.fin"
    <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, "steve.murphy"
    <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
    oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
    <Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, newstips <newstips@cnn.com>,
    elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, justin.ling@vice.com,
    Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mdcohen212@gmail.com,
    washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
    <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Donald J. Trump"<contact@win.donaldjtrump.com>
    Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 15:49:11 +0000
    Subject: I'm asking for your input.
    To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

    I'm asking for your input.

       
    Add star 

    Donald J. Trump

    <contact@win.donaldjtrump.com>
    Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 12:49 PM
    Reply-To: reply-K4BXN6KWKD-GGMSdSWWsq-KGJDN7@win.donaldjtrump.com
    To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    Save America President Donald J. Trump
     
    Friend,

    The Fake News Media, working in close conjunction with Big Tech and their partners, the Democrats, to SILENCE you.

    Remember when they took FREE SPEECH away from the 45th President of the United States?
    I do.

    Right now, Big Tech is accountable to NO ONE. They get away with anything that appeases the Democrats’ socialist agenda and I’m FIGHTING BACK.

    My team launched the Official Big Tech Accountability Survey and I need YOUR input. I’m only reaching out to a few of my BEST supporters for help with this, so please do not share your personalized link with anyone.


    Please take the Official Big Tech Accountability Survey IMMEDIATELY to make sure I can review your response. >>
     
    I’ve asked my team to print the results of this very important survey soon. I’ll be looking specifically for YOUR response, Friend. Will I see it?

    Take the Official Big Tech Accountability Survey RIGHT NOW to have your response counted in the official results.


    Thank you,

    President Donald J. Trump Signature Headshot
    Donald J. Trump
    45th President of the United States


     
    TAKE THE SURVEY NOW >>

     



     
    Paid for by Save America JFC, a joint fundraising committee of Save America and Make America Great Again PAC. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee. Donaldjtrump.com

    Save America, PO Box 13570, Arlington, VA 22219

    Privacy Policy | Unsubscribe 

     

    Deja Vu Anyone???
     

     

    Tuesday, 14 February 2017

    RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why does he lie to me after all this time???

     > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos
    > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
    > Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
    > just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
    > does he lie to me after all this time???
    > To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
    > Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
    > B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
    > pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
    > fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
    > "CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management" , news-tips , lionel
    > Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
    > elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
    > stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
    > oldmaison , andre
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: Michael Cohen
    > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
    > called and left a message for you
    > To: David Amos
    >
    > Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
    > counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
    > directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
    > directed to 646-853-0114.
    > ________________________________
    > This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
    > thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
    > This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
    > proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
    > copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
    > recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
    > received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
    > promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
    > to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
    > corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
    > or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
    > guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
    > any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
    > any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
    > represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
    > affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
    > electronic signature under applicable law.
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
    > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
    > Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
    > T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
    > To: David Amos
    >
    > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    > comments.
    >
    > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    > commentaires.

     


    https://ottawacitizen.com/opinion/columnists/cohen-addicted-to-chaos-donald-trump-refuses-to-fade-from-public-life

     

    Cohen: Addicted to chaos, Donald Trump refuses to fade from public life

    PORTLAND, Maine — It was a conventional, natural and widely shared expectation after the presidential election of Nov. 3, 2020, that the loser would leave public life.

    Isn’t this what one-term presidents do after the voters “hand you your hat and send you to the bus stop,” as George H.W. Bush described losing the White House to Bill Clinton in 1992? You go home and go to ground — writing your memoirs, planning your presidential library, becoming an elder statesman.

    Nurse your wounds in Kennebunkport, Maine (George Bush), or Plains, Ga. (Jimmy Carter). Give dull speeches and make real money. Join the world’s most exclusive club of former U.S. presidents.

    Now we know the idea that Donald Trump would fade away — even after a campaign challenging the legitimacy of the election — was always fanciful, even as Joe Biden came to power and COVID-19 receded.

    The Republic endured in 2020, but so did Trump.

    From his five-star redoubt in Mar-a-Lago, Fla., Trump plans his comeback. He raises millions. He perpetuates the big lie of the stolen election. He anoints loyalists and excommunicates others. He rails on social media. He holds rallies.

    At the same time, Trump stonewalls attempts to hold him accountable for the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. When the House special committee demands relevant documents from him or his staff — memos, reports, telephone logs — he refuses to release them. As always, he goes to court, trying to run out the clock.

    Like everything else about Donald Trump, it is all outrageous and strangely normal. Trump may have never heard of Napoleon, but Trump has become the Corsican corporal in his own unhappy exile, preparing his return from Elba.

    His road to restoration became clearer Tuesday when the Republicans reclaimed the governorship of Virginia. True or not, Trump is taking credit for Glenn Youngkin’s victory, which he’ll use to inject himself into the 2022 congressional mid-term elections. And then, of course, to run for president in 2024.

    If Trump succeeds in winning a second non-consecutive term, he will be the only president to do so other than Grover Cleveland, who won the presidency again in 1892. While both left office vowing to return — Cleveland’s wife told staff at the White House they would be back in four years — Cleveland was a spirited reformer and an effective president.

    (When Cleveland ran the first time, he was tainted by personal scandal, like Trump. His accusers said he had sired a child out of wedlock, which produced the memorable chant of the campaign: “Ma, Ma, where’s my Pa? Gone to the White House, ha, ha, ha!”)

    Scandal didn’t stop Cleveland and it won’t stop Trump. The real or prospective impediments to his return to elective politics have not yet thwarted him — personal bankruptcy, corporate criminality, allegations of sexual assault, and, most of all, inciting the insurrectionists on January 6.

    Is the Department of Justice going to charge Trump for his role in events that day? Will authorities in Georgia make a case of election interference around his phone call urging a senior official to find Trump thousands of votes? Will authorities in New York City bring down his business? So far, none has.

    We now see the consequences of the failure of more Republicans to join Democrats in the Senate in convicting Trump of high crimes and misdemeanours last winter. Had they found him guilty, he would have been unable to hold public office.

    Thanks to excellent reporting, we know more about Trump on Jan. 6. Consider this: For some three hours, as the mob roamed the halls of Congress, looting offices and looking to lynch Mike Pence, Trump sat in the Oval Office, refusing many entreaties from his daughter and others to urge the rioters to stop.

    He liked the chaos too much. This is the man who yearns to be president again, venerated by Republicans, seething with rage, exploiting race and fear in this fraught country.

    In the end Donald Trump may not win again. But he haunts us still.

    Andrew Cohen is a journalist, a professor at Carleton University and author of Two Days in June: John F. Kennedy and the 48 Hours That Made History  

     

    https://www.pressreader.com/canada/ottawa-citizen/20190905/281535112672870

     

    Newsroom: 613-596-3664 City: Drake Fenton, 613-726-5877, dfenton@postmedia.com
    cspencer@postmedia.com

     

    https://carleton.ca/sjc/profile/cohen-andrew/

    Andrew Cohen

    Associate Professor

    Photo of Cohen, Andrew

      Email:Andrew.Cohen@carleton.ca

    Biography

    Andrew Cohen is an author, columnist and broadcaster who joined the School of Journalism and Communication in 2001.

    In a career of 40 years, he has worked in Ottawa, Toronto, Washington, London and Berlin. He has written for The Globe and Mail, The New York Times, Foreign Affairs, United Press International, Time, CNN.com, and The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, among other publications.

    His books cover subjects ranging from Canada’s constitutional politics to national character to Arctic exploration. His study of Canadian foreign policy — While Canada Slept: How We Lost Our Place in the World — was a finalist for the Governor General’s Literary Award for Non-Fiction. His other best-selling books explore the lives of Pierre Elliott Trudeau and Lester B. Pearson.

    His latest book is Two Days in June: John F. Kennedy’s 48 Hours That Made History, which has been optioned as a feature film in Hollywood.

    Cohen has won two National Newspaper Awards, three National Magazine Awards and the Queen’s Jubilee Medal. He writes a syndicated column for The Ottawa Citizen and is a political commentator on CTV News Channel.

    A native of Montreal, Cohen attended The Choate School in Connecticut, followed by McGill University, Carleton University and the University of Cambridge. He has degrees in political science, journalism and international relations.

    He was correspondent and columnist for The Globe and Mail in Washington, where he recently returned as a Fulbright Fellow at the Wilson Center for International Scholars.

    Cohen teaches courses on Canada and the United States, Canada and the World, in-depth reporting, and advanced writing.

    Journalism

    4309 Richcraft Hall
    1125 Colonel By Drive
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada  K1S 5B6
    Phone: (613) 520-2600 x7404
    Email:journalism@carleton.ca
    Twitter:@JSchool_CU

     

     

    https://www.amazon.ca/Two-Days-June-Kennedy-History/dp/0771023871#:~:text=On%20two%20consecutive%20days%20in,nuclear%20arms%20and%20civil%20rights.&text=His%20speech%20on%20June%2010,Civil%20Rights%20Act%20of%201964.

    Two Days in June: John F. Kennedy and the 48 Hours that Made History Hardcover – Nov. 11 2014

    On two consecutive days in June 1963, in two lyrical speeches, John F. Kennedy pivots dramatically and boldly on the two greatest issues of his time: nuclear arms and civil rights. In language unheard in lily white, Cold War America, he appeals to Americans to see both the Russians and the "Negroes" as human beings. His speech on June 10 leads to the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty of 1963; his speech on June 11 to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Based on new material -- hours of recently uncovered documentary film shot in the White House and the Justice Department, fresh interviews, and a rediscovered draft speech -- Two Days in June captures Kennedy at the high noon of his presidency in startling, granular detail which biographer Sally Bedell Smith calls "a seamless and riveting narrative, beautifully written, weaving together the consequential and the quotidian, with verve and authority." Moment by moment, JFK's feverish forty-eight hours unspools in cinematic clarity as he addresses "peace and freedom." In the tick-tock of the American presidency, we see Kennedy facing down George Wallace over the integration of the University of Alabama, talking obsessively about sex and politics at a dinner party in Georgetown, recoiling at a newspaper photograph of a burning monk in Saigon, planning a secret diplomatic mission to Indonesia, and reeling from the midnight murder of Medgar Evers.
    There were 1,036 days in the presidency of John F. Kennedy. This is the story of two of them.

     

     

     


    Methinks Higgy et al know why I love the circus N'esy Pas?

    $
    0
    0

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/cupe-strike-new-brunswick-1.6238217 

     

    Striking workers heckle, jeer as premier addresses CUPE news conference

    Government schedules its own news conference on dispute for 2:45 p.m.

    Higgs, Shephard and Flemming provide update on strike by public-sector workers

    35 minutes ago
    Live
    Flemming provide an update on strike by public-sector workers, hours after CUPE held its own news conference. 0:00

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs crashed a news conference by the Canadian Union of Public Employees on Friday morning as efforts to end a week-old strike by public-sector workers appeared to go off the rails.

    CUPE officials were laying out a counter-proposal they made to the government overnight when the premier appeared at the news conference outside the legislature in Fredericton.

    "That's not how bargaining works," CUPE New Brunswick president Stephen Drost told reporters later, though Drost had challenged Higgs to "come out right now and … settle this" just before the premier's arrival.

    Higgs listened to Drost outline Thursday's discussions for several minutes before the union offered him its microphone to address the crowd.

    Higgs then laid out his position, defending pension changes in the province's offer, and getting into back-and-forth debates with some of the union leaders and with striking workers in the crowd.

    Canadian Union of Public Employees president Steve Drost handed the microphone to Premier Blaine Higgs at a union news conference Friday in Fredericton. Higgs defended the pension changes in the province's offer the night before, and said health-care workers need to go back to work. (CBC)

    "No one loses anything in their current plans," he said, trying to explain details of the province's proposal on pensions for two CUPE locals not part of the existing shared-risk plan.

    He said health-care workers need to come back to work, which was met with jeers from the crowd. 

    Eventually, he asked for a more orderly question-and-answer format. At that point, CUPE asked for its microphone back and the premier left.

    The dramatic and unconventional confrontation took place just an hour after Higgs told the legislature that CUPE had promised after a marathon meeting Thursday to recommend a government offer to its members.

    The first of more than 20,000 CUPE members began walking off the job last Friday morning after contract negotiations with the province collapsed for the second time.

    The striking workers include jail guards, school custodians, educational assistants, court stenographers, and clerical and cleaning staff working for regional health authorities.

    Higgs said in question period Friday morning that "we had a path forward when we left last night" that CUPE leaders promised to recommend to members, so he was disappointed to see health-care workers still picketing.

    "We had an agreement last night," he said. But he said there was a condition attached to it about health-care workers returning to their jobs quickly.

    Higgs said Attorney-General Ted Flemming and Health Minister Dorothy Shephard "are reviewing our options at this stage," a reference to the possibility of back-to-work legislation or the use of the province's emergency order to end the strike.

    "We are in a pandemic," Higgs said. "We will address the issues in our hospitals. … We will be moving forward to get health-care workers back to work."

    The government has scheduled a news conference for 2:45 p.m.

    Drost told the outdoor news conference that he sent the government a counter-proposal to Thursday night's offer at 4:03 a.m.

    He said if the province had accepted it, he had been prepared to send union members back to work Friday morning, but no response had come.

    "We have gone above and beyond every step of this way to protect the public and protect you, but once again, tricks are being played," he said.

    The first of several CUPE locals representing 20,000 workers walked off the job the morning of Oct. 29. 

    Drost arrived for the meeting with Higgs on Thursday at 1 p.m. and left at 8:45 p.m.

    The dispute has focused on CUPE's push for wage increases, but Higgs is insisting that the union also agree to shift two of the union locals into the province's shared-risk pension plan. 

    That dispute over pensions was the focus of Higg's impromptu debates with CUPE members during his surprise appearance at the news conference.

    Premier Blaine Higgs arrives at the Canadian Union of Public Employees' news conference at the foot of the legislature Friday morning. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

    Higgs said during question period that the province had received a response from CUPE but would not say what it was. 

    But he said the union had raised "something additional" that wasn't part of Thursday's discussions.

    "We are now focused on the emergency order and the health-care system in our province."

    Drost called Higgs's appearance at the news conference "so bizarre" and would not say whether he thought health-care locals would comply if they were legally ordered back to work.

    "This has been so unusual, this round of bargaining. We've never seen anything like this, ever."

     

    http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.com/ 

     

    Friday, 5 November 2021

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs leaves C.U.P.E News Conference in front of N.B. Legislature!!!! 

     



    Posted by Charles Leblanc at 6:39 pm No comments :

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs speaks to C.U.P.E. Protesters in front of the New Brunswick Legislature!!!



    Posted by Charles Leblanc at 6:37 pm No comments : 

     

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs shows up in person at C.U.P.E. News conference in front of the New Brunswick Legislature!!!! 

     


    Posted by Charles Leblanc at 6:36 pm No comments :

     

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/premier-cupe-meet-1.6237094

     

    Meeting between Premier and CUPE leader ends, but both sides mum on outcome

    No details released and no announcement made about whether meeting will resume Friday

    Stephen Drost arrived at Chancery Place, where the Premier's office is located, a few minutes before 1 p.m. He and fellow CUPE officials left shortly before 9 p.m.

    A government spokesperson confirmed the meeting was over but would not say if there was any result or if the meeting would resume Friday morning.

    CUPE spokesperson Simon Ouellette also confirmed the discussions had ended but had no further comment.

    The first of more than 20,000 CUPE members began walking off the job last Friday morning after contract negotiations with the province collapsed for the second time.

    Higgs told reporters Thursday morning that he still hoped the union will bend on his push to add another CUPE local to the province's shared-risk pension plan.

    "From the beginning there's been this 'I won't talk about it,'" he said. "I don't think any of us can go in with the attitude that we won't talk about it. That isn't the spirit of any meeting you'd have to try to resolve conflict."

    He said he didn't expect the meeting with Drost to resolve the dispute, but it could determine whether negotiations can resume. 

    He added that he was prepared to talk to Drost for as long as it took. 

    "It's the priority, so for me it won't really matter what else is in the schedule."

    The striking workers include jail guards, school custodians, court stenographers, and clerical and cleaning staff working for regional health authorities.

    The locals have been without contracts for years. The court stenographers' last contract expired in 2016. 

    Another CUPE local representing N.B. Liquor store and warehouse workers is holding a strike vote this week. 

    Higgs has warned that he could use back-to-work legislation, including an imposed wage mandate, to end the dispute. 

    But he said he may also use the province's COVID-19 emergency order to force health-care workers back, given the impact of the strike on vaccination clinics, testing sites and hospital procedures. 

    "Something has to give. We can't let the health-care system be impacted." 

    While legislation would take several days of debate before it could be adopted, the emergency order can be invoked quickly by cabinet order.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/wage-mandate-cupe-meeting-higgs-1.6235718 

     

    Higgs to meet with CUPE Thursday as opposition to single 'wage mandate' heats up

    Premier hopes to avoid back-to-work bill, nurses union issues warning of legal challenge if bill goes ahead

    New Brunswick Nurses Union president Paula Doucet says her members won't accept a so-called wage mandate that Premier Blaine Higgs could use to end the strike.

    And she would not rule out a legal challenge to such a law.

    "We have some legal [people] here in our office that would definitely put their eyes to that," Doucet says.

    Higgs repeated his warning Wednesday that if he uses back-to-work legislation to end the CUPE strike, it will include a wage mandate imposing uniform increases on those union locals and all other public-sector workers.

    Doucet says that would be an insult to nurses who've been on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020 and who have twice rejected tentative agreements on a new contract.

    "Having something mandated to them now is another slap in the face," she said.

    "Nurses are tired and frustrated and exhausted, and they're just really looking for some recognition here as well as better working conditions and fair compensation, and they're not getting that now."

    Paula Doucet, the president of the New Brunswick Nurses Union, says a wage mandate would be an insult to nurses who've been on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020. (Ed Hunter)

    Premier 'optimistic' a deal can be reached

    Higgs told reporters Wednesday morning he still hopes to avoid using legislation to end the dispute, which began last Friday.

    "I'd like to remain optimistic that we will still be able to work out a negotiated settlement with CUPE, and the opportunity for us to get back to the table is real." 

    Not long afterward, CUPE New Brunswick spokesperson Simon Ouellette confirmed that union officials will meet government representatives Thursday at 1 p.m.

    "I can confirm the premier has invited CUPE leadership to meet tomorrow at 1 p.m.," Higgs's spokesperson Nicolle Carlin said in a statement.

    Ouellette said it's not clear whether it's a return to bargaining or just a meeting to discuss restarting negotiations.

    Around 20,000 CUPE members in 10 locals began striking last Friday after a second breakdown in contract negotiations. The locals have been without contracts for years. One, representing court stenographers, saw its last agreement expire in 2016.

    ANBL workers starting strike votes

    CUPE announced Wednesday that another of its locals representing N.B. Liquor employees were starting strike votes that would run until Saturday.

    Members of Local 963, who include employees of 41 liquor stores, ratified a contract last year, but Higgs blocked it because its wage increases were higher than his wage model for provincial workers.

    Several hundred CUPE members and supporters returned to the legislature Wednesday after a larger protest Tuesday. For the second day, horns and noisemakers used by the crowd were picked up by the microphones and sound system in the chamber.

    In question period, Opposition Liberal Leader Roger Melanson pressed Attorney-General Ted Flemming on a 2015 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that upheld the right to strike and set a high bar for governments using back-to-work legislation.

    Flemming called it a "complex question" with "assorted variations" of court rulings on the issue but said any legislation would comply with the Constitution.

    "If it is not justified in law, we won't do it," he said.

    Wage mandate would have to be for all: Higgs

    Higgs said applying a wage mandate to all bargaining groups, whether they have signed contracts now or not, would protect the bill from a legal challenge. 

    "It would be for all unions, because it wouldn't be fair [otherwise]. That's my understanding legally. … We have to do it for everyone." 

    That would involve about 58,000 provincial employees, about 80 per cent of whom are represented by unions, he said.

    Higgs added that no union with a signed contract would see anything rolled back by a wage mandate. Any imposed package would be equal to or better than existing agreements.

    "I would feel obligated to provide those same terms and conditions to those that have settled," the premier said.

    Liberal Leader Roger Melanson said a back-to-work bill with a single wage mandate across the board is not the way to go. (Joe McDonald/CBC file photo)

    Melanson said a back-to-work bill with a single wage mandate across the board is not the way to go. 

    "Each group has different issues that they want to deal with, so that's why you get to the negotiating table and you discuss them. Negotiation is not a monologue, it's a dialogue."

    Green Leader David Coon said such a move would be "autocratic." 

    "It throws the whole notion of collective bargaining on its head, to be doing that by fiat, by legislated fiat. Not only is it unacceptable but I think it would be open to court challenges, no question."

    Higgs said Wednesday that a second-quarter fiscal projection for the 2021-22 financial year foresees a budget surplus of $200 million to $300 million, a fact that opposition parties seized on to argue the province can afford to make CUPE a better offer.

    The premier repeated that any contract has to be affordable for years to come, and it's not certain the province will have that much money to work with after this year.

    The Liberals also continued needling Higgs about whether his PC caucus is united behind his approach to negotiations.

    "There's a whole team of ministers and MLAs and we still don't know what they believe in this strike situation," Melanson said in question period. "What is his team actually doing to help him out?"

    Higgs said that "more than most," he's been open to different views in his government, but "at the end of the day, the premier does what he believes is right with the collection of information he has received from his caucus." 

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Jacques Poitras

    Provincial Affairs reporter

    Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

     https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b14zbd8t83jtp3/following-dutch-model-new-brunswick-leads-canadas-pension-model-reforms

     

    Following Dutch Model, New Brunswick
    Leads Canada's Pension Model Reforms

    A new, risk-sharing pension design is taking off in Canada.

    Following Dutch Model, New Brunswick Leads Canada's Pension Model Reforms

    On May 31, 2012 David Alward stood before the Legislative Assembly of the Province of New Brunswick, Canada. As Premier, he was about to preside over an event unprecedented in the history of the province. It was the last day before the legislature’s summer recess and Alward, as host of the occasion, had invited representatives from all six New Brunswick labor unions onto the floor, along with members of both the Liberal and New Democratic opposition parties and a special task force he had appointed after his 2010 election. After more than a year of research, planning and negotiation, the unified group of labor and elected officials had an announcement to make. The subject du jour: pensions.

    The events of May 2012 have only just begun to be felt across the province and beyond its borders. Whereas many private companies and public jurisdictions have previously turned to employer-based, individual retirement savings plans as a solution to their employees’ future income needs, the citizens, politicians, union members and pension officials in New Brunswick sought and enacted a solution to providing real pension benefits that would be economically sound under 21st century conditions. Now throughout Canada, and beyond its borders, pension stakeholders are starting to take note.

    As the financial crisis of 2008 exploded, New Brunswick — which shares its western border with the U.S. State of Maine and its eastern border with the Atlantic Ocean — watched many of the public and private pension funds within its borders take a big hit. It soon became apparent that the usual Band Aid–type fixes, like increasing contributions into a plan, were not going to work this time.

    Honoring his campaign promise to find an industrial strength fix for pension underfunding, in late October 2010 Alward appointed a three-member task force to solve the problem. In a particularly politic move, the premier tapped well-respected labor attorney Susan Rowland and longtime actuary Paul McCrossan, a member of Alward’s Progressive Conservative party, to spearhead the effort. Economics professor and public policy research expert Pierre-Marcel Desjardins rounded out the team. After more than a year of studying pension systems around the globe, and identifying the Dutch system as their number one model, the New Brunswick Pension Task Force announced the details of a new pension scheme that would be “more secure, transparent, sustainable, reliable, affordable and predictable” than either a defined benefit or defined contribution plan. It was named the Shared Risk Pension.

    “Shared risk would fix most pension problems in North America,” asserts Rowland, chief of the pension task force. With the shared risk model, New Brunswick became the first jurisdiction in North America to develop comprehensive funding and risk management procedures in the administration of pensions, that cover both asset and liability management while addressing the challenges faced by pension schemes today and into the future, underlines the report entitled, “Rebuilding New Brunswick: The Case for Pension Reform.”

    The new pension model sports the best features of the Dutch pension system: pooled assets that are professionally managed; strict and predictable funding requirements; and risk management processes not previously a part of New Brunswick’s defined benefit plans. Like the Dutch plan — and the Wisconsin Retirement System in the U.S. — the shared risk plan is designed to self-correct according to the performance of its investment portfolio. That means that cost of living adjustments are eliminated in favor of a system of either “dividends” or reductions that change in concert with the annual portfolio asset size fluctuations.

    Alward began his quest for a better pension model after several forest and paper products companies, the biggest industry in New Brunswick, took a severe hit during the dip in the housing market brought on by the 2002 downturn and 2008 financial crisis. Companies like Fraser Papers (in 2010) and St. Anne-Nackawic Pulp Co. (in 2004) saw their pension promises go up in smoke as they entered bankruptcy. When pensioners had their monthly checks slashed by 30 to 40 percent, Canadians learned that a pension promise could be broken. Soon public pension deficits came to light as Moody’s Investor Services and Standard and Poor’s Rating Services downgraded New Brunswick’s credit rating in 2009 and 2010, respectively.

    One of the keys to making the new pension scheme a reality was the cooperation between political parties, public government and labor unions. “We adopted a collaborative approach to get it done,” explains task force member McCrossan. “When we designed the pension plan, the whole province took part in it,” adds the actuary who came back from his 2006 retirement twice: once to help the International Monetary Fund grapple with global pension issues ahead of the impending crisis and then again in 2010 when Alward appointed him to the pension task force. “The fear factor went away when we showed them the information,” agrees Michael O’Brien, a Fredericton city councillor and former finance committee chair, speaking about his own work with the unions and retirees.

    The City of Fredericton, home of the provincial government, has six separate pension funds, five of which initially chose to move to the new structure. Along with the pension of New Brunswick’s City of Saint John, the governance structure of the old plan has been entirely redesigned. In the City of Fredericton, the old defined benefit plan, which had been managed by the municipal government along with its other financial portfolios, is now, by law, the fiduciary responsibility of an independent board of eight trustees. The board members are an even split between council-appointees and union members.

    “Six union presidents came together in July 2010,” explains Wade Kierstead, president of CUPE 3864, known formally as the Canadian Union of Public Employees’ Technical and Professional Union for the City of Fredericton. That was when the city’s pension fund first raised serious flags. The $200 million City of Fredericton pension fund was found to be $59 million underfunded. It is one of the smaller plans; the largest, the New Brunswick government employee fund, stands at $5 billion in assets. Kierstead and his fellow union leaders got their members behind the change. There are sacrifices on both sides, employee and employer. For example, both will increase their contributions and a higher retirement age will be phased in over a 40-year period. Like Dutch pensions, the plans must be overfunded, in this case at 115 percent, to meet new legal requirements. “Everybody takes a little cut,” explains Jane Blakely, director of strategic direction and consulting for the City of Fredericton.

    To incorporate all the changes, the Canadian Pension Benefits Act had to be amended. So it was that on May 31, 2012, when the amendment was officially accepted, creating a Part 2 of the Act that made way for the new pension regime, that the entire legislature gave Alward, the union leaders, and the pension task force a well-deserved standing ovation for bringing about a change that protects the future retirement of the 47,000 public employees of the Province of New Brunswick.

    Looking forward, there are now plans in the pipeline, following the change over to the new scheme for most New Brunswick pensions, to amalgamate most of the plans into one, $10 billion pension plan. Outside New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale and Prince Edward Island Premier Robert Ghiz, are both studying the New Brunswick pension model.

    For Canada, the development and adoption of a pension plan for the 21st century proves that it is possible for a disparate group of pension stakeholders — legislators, labor unions, employees, pensioners, and citizens — to work together to ensure a secure retirement for public servants.

     

     https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/news/news_release.2010.12.1849.html

     

    Pension task force members named

    FREDERICTON (CNB) – The three members of the Task Force on Protecting Pensions were named today by Justice and Consumer Affairs Minister Marie-Claude Blais.

    The task force, which was announced on Oct. 28, will lead public consultations and examine the long-term stability and security of private pensions in New Brunswick.

    The three members of the task force are Paul McCrossan, Susan Rowland and Pierre-Marcel Desjardins.

    "Employees deserve to know that the pensions they have contributed to all their working lives will be there when they retire,” said Blais. “Retirees need to know the pension they count on will continue to support them throughout retirement. That is why I am pleased we have been able to assemble such a qualified team of experts to undertake this important review."

    Among the issues that the task force will examine are:

    ●    rules protecting employees and pensioners;
    ●    ensuring that the long-term sustainability of pension promises made to workers is honoured and protected; and
    ●    reviewing the structure meant to protect pension plans to insure they are as effective as possible.

    "Our goal at the end of the review is to ensure New Brunswick has the rules and regulations in place that are needed to offer our residents the best protection possible for their hard-earned pension savings," said Blais.

    The task force brings extensive experience in the field of private pension administration and pension restructuring. The panel will report back to government with their findings and recommendations.

    Biographies of task force members

    Paul McCrossan

    Throughout his career as a consultant and actuary, McCrossan has held various positions with the Canadian Institute of Actuaries, the Society of Actuaries and the International Actuarial Association. He has written and lectured extensively on the topic of finances and pensions. Serving twice as a Member of Parliament, he was involved in the reform of a number of key pieces of pension-related legislation, including the Pension Benefits Standards Act and the Canada Pension Plan Act.  

    Susan Rowland

    A graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School, Rowland has focused her career on pension and benefits law, with particular expertise in the restructuring and funding of pension plans. Appointed as representative counsel by the Superintendent of Financial institutions for Ontario, she has assisted in resolving the under-funding of several high-profile pension plans, including: Algoma Steel, Ivaco Inc., General Motors of Canada and Chrysler Inc. Rowland has published numerous papers in professional journals and has been frequently invited to speak before groups interested in pension and insolvency issues.   

    Pierre-Marcel Desjardins

    Desjardins has a Ph.D. in economics and has been teaching economics at the Université de Moncton since 1990. He is also researcher at that Canadian Institute for Research on Public Policy and Public Administration. He is vice-president of the Fédération des caisses populaires acadiennes, the executive director of the Canadian Regional Science Association, a member of the board of directors of the Caisse populaire Kent-Sud, and a member of the advisory committee for the Sainte-Marie-de-Kent local service district.

     

    Paul Harpelle, communications, Department of Justice and Consumer Affairs, 506-453-6543, paul.harpelle@gnb.ca.


    https://www.linkedin.com/in/sue-rowland-226a2a83/?originalSubdomain=ca

    Sue Rowland

    Pension Consultant at Rowland Consulting
    Port Hope, Ontario, Canada Contact info

    Striking workers heckle, jeer as premier addresses CUPE news conference

    $
    0
    0

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/cupe-strike-new-brunswick-1.6238217 

     

    Striking workers heckle, jeer as premier addresses CUPE news conference

    Government schedules its own news conference on dispute for 2:45 p.m.

    Higgs, Shephard and Flemming provide update on strike by public-sector workers

    35 minutes ago
    Live
    Flemming provide an update on strike by public-sector workers, hours after CUPE held its own news conference. 0:00

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs crashed a news conference by the Canadian Union of Public Employees on Friday morning as efforts to end a week-old strike by public-sector workers appeared to go off the rails.

    CUPE officials were laying out a counter-proposal they made to the government overnight when the premier appeared at the news conference outside the legislature in Fredericton.

    "That's not how bargaining works," CUPE New Brunswick president Stephen Drost told reporters later, though Drost had challenged Higgs to "come out right now and … settle this" just before the premier's arrival.

    Higgs listened to Drost outline Thursday's discussions for several minutes before the union offered him its microphone to address the crowd.

    Higgs then laid out his position, defending pension changes in the province's offer, and getting into back-and-forth debates with some of the union leaders and with striking workers in the crowd.

    Canadian Union of Public Employees president Steve Drost handed the microphone to Premier Blaine Higgs at a union news conference Friday in Fredericton. Higgs defended the pension changes in the province's offer the night before, and said health-care workers need to go back to work. (CBC)

    "No one loses anything in their current plans," he said, trying to explain details of the province's proposal on pensions for two CUPE locals not part of the existing shared-risk plan.

    He said health-care workers need to come back to work, which was met with jeers from the crowd. 

    Eventually, he asked for a more orderly question-and-answer format. At that point, CUPE asked for its microphone back and the premier left.

    The dramatic and unconventional confrontation took place just an hour after Higgs told the legislature that CUPE had promised after a marathon meeting Thursday to recommend a government offer to its members.

    The first of more than 20,000 CUPE members began walking off the job last Friday morning after contract negotiations with the province collapsed for the second time.

    The striking workers include jail guards, school custodians, educational assistants, court stenographers, and clerical and cleaning staff working for regional health authorities.

    Higgs said in question period Friday morning that "we had a path forward when we left last night" that CUPE leaders promised to recommend to members, so he was disappointed to see health-care workers still picketing.

    "We had an agreement last night," he said. But he said there was a condition attached to it about health-care workers returning to their jobs quickly.

    Higgs said Attorney-General Ted Flemming and Health Minister Dorothy Shephard "are reviewing our options at this stage," a reference to the possibility of back-to-work legislation or the use of the province's emergency order to end the strike.

    "We are in a pandemic," Higgs said. "We will address the issues in our hospitals. … We will be moving forward to get health-care workers back to work."

    The government has scheduled a news conference for 2:45 p.m.

    Drost told the outdoor news conference that he sent the government a counter-proposal to Thursday night's offer at 4:03 a.m.

    He said if the province had accepted it, he had been prepared to send union members back to work Friday morning, but no response had come.

    "We have gone above and beyond every step of this way to protect the public and protect you, but once again, tricks are being played," he said.

    The first of several CUPE locals representing 20,000 workers walked off the job the morning of Oct. 29. 

    Drost arrived for the meeting with Higgs on Thursday at 1 p.m. and left at 8:45 p.m.

    The dispute has focused on CUPE's push for wage increases, but Higgs is insisting that the union also agree to shift two of the union locals into the province's shared-risk pension plan. 

    That dispute over pensions was the focus of Higg's impromptu debates with CUPE members during his surprise appearance at the news conference.

    Premier Blaine Higgs arrives at the Canadian Union of Public Employees' news conference at the foot of the legislature Friday morning. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

    Higgs said during question period that the province had received a response from CUPE but would not say what it was. 

    But he said the union had raised "something additional" that wasn't part of Thursday's discussions.

    "We are now focused on the emergency order and the health-care system in our province."

    Drost called Higgs's appearance at the news conference "so bizarre" and would not say whether he thought health-care locals would comply if they were legally ordered back to work.

    "This has been so unusual, this round of bargaining. We've never seen anything like this, ever."

     

    http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.com/ 

     

    Friday, 5 November 2021

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs leaves C.U.P.E News Conference in front of N.B. Legislature!!!! 

     



    Posted by Charles Leblanc at 6:39 pm No comments :

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs speaks to C.U.P.E. Protesters in front of the New Brunswick Legislature!!!



    Posted by Charles Leblanc at 6:37 pm No comments : 

     

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs shows up in person at C.U.P.E. News conference in front of the New Brunswick Legislature!!!! 

     


    Posted by Charles Leblanc at 6:36 pm No comments :

     

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/premier-cupe-meet-1.6237094

     

    Meeting between Premier and CUPE leader ends, but both sides mum on outcome

    No details released and no announcement made about whether meeting will resume Friday

    Stephen Drost arrived at Chancery Place, where the Premier's office is located, a few minutes before 1 p.m. He and fellow CUPE officials left shortly before 9 p.m.

    A government spokesperson confirmed the meeting was over but would not say if there was any result or if the meeting would resume Friday morning.

    CUPE spokesperson Simon Ouellette also confirmed the discussions had ended but had no further comment.

    The first of more than 20,000 CUPE members began walking off the job last Friday morning after contract negotiations with the province collapsed for the second time.

    Higgs told reporters Thursday morning that he still hoped the union will bend on his push to add another CUPE local to the province's shared-risk pension plan.

    "From the beginning there's been this 'I won't talk about it,'" he said. "I don't think any of us can go in with the attitude that we won't talk about it. That isn't the spirit of any meeting you'd have to try to resolve conflict."

    He said he didn't expect the meeting with Drost to resolve the dispute, but it could determine whether negotiations can resume. 

    He added that he was prepared to talk to Drost for as long as it took. 

    "It's the priority, so for me it won't really matter what else is in the schedule."

    The striking workers include jail guards, school custodians, court stenographers, and clerical and cleaning staff working for regional health authorities.

    The locals have been without contracts for years. The court stenographers' last contract expired in 2016. 

    Another CUPE local representing N.B. Liquor store and warehouse workers is holding a strike vote this week. 

    Higgs has warned that he could use back-to-work legislation, including an imposed wage mandate, to end the dispute. 

    But he said he may also use the province's COVID-19 emergency order to force health-care workers back, given the impact of the strike on vaccination clinics, testing sites and hospital procedures. 

    "Something has to give. We can't let the health-care system be impacted." 

    While legislation would take several days of debate before it could be adopted, the emergency order can be invoked quickly by cabinet order.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/wage-mandate-cupe-meeting-higgs-1.6235718 

     

    Higgs to meet with CUPE Thursday as opposition to single 'wage mandate' heats up

    Premier hopes to avoid back-to-work bill, nurses union issues warning of legal challenge if bill goes ahead

    New Brunswick Nurses Union president Paula Doucet says her members won't accept a so-called wage mandate that Premier Blaine Higgs could use to end the strike.

    And she would not rule out a legal challenge to such a law.

    "We have some legal [people] here in our office that would definitely put their eyes to that," Doucet says.

    Higgs repeated his warning Wednesday that if he uses back-to-work legislation to end the CUPE strike, it will include a wage mandate imposing uniform increases on those union locals and all other public-sector workers.

    Doucet says that would be an insult to nurses who've been on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020 and who have twice rejected tentative agreements on a new contract.

    "Having something mandated to them now is another slap in the face," she said.

    "Nurses are tired and frustrated and exhausted, and they're just really looking for some recognition here as well as better working conditions and fair compensation, and they're not getting that now."

    Paula Doucet, the president of the New Brunswick Nurses Union, says a wage mandate would be an insult to nurses who've been on the front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020. (Ed Hunter)

    Premier 'optimistic' a deal can be reached

    Higgs told reporters Wednesday morning he still hopes to avoid using legislation to end the dispute, which began last Friday.

    "I'd like to remain optimistic that we will still be able to work out a negotiated settlement with CUPE, and the opportunity for us to get back to the table is real." 

    Not long afterward, CUPE New Brunswick spokesperson Simon Ouellette confirmed that union officials will meet government representatives Thursday at 1 p.m.

    "I can confirm the premier has invited CUPE leadership to meet tomorrow at 1 p.m.," Higgs's spokesperson Nicolle Carlin said in a statement.

    Ouellette said it's not clear whether it's a return to bargaining or just a meeting to discuss restarting negotiations.

    Around 20,000 CUPE members in 10 locals began striking last Friday after a second breakdown in contract negotiations. The locals have been without contracts for years. One, representing court stenographers, saw its last agreement expire in 2016.

    ANBL workers starting strike votes

    CUPE announced Wednesday that another of its locals representing N.B. Liquor employees were starting strike votes that would run until Saturday.

    Members of Local 963, who include employees of 41 liquor stores, ratified a contract last year, but Higgs blocked it because its wage increases were higher than his wage model for provincial workers.

    Several hundred CUPE members and supporters returned to the legislature Wednesday after a larger protest Tuesday. For the second day, horns and noisemakers used by the crowd were picked up by the microphones and sound system in the chamber.

    In question period, Opposition Liberal Leader Roger Melanson pressed Attorney-General Ted Flemming on a 2015 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that upheld the right to strike and set a high bar for governments using back-to-work legislation.

    Flemming called it a "complex question" with "assorted variations" of court rulings on the issue but said any legislation would comply with the Constitution.

    "If it is not justified in law, we won't do it," he said.

    Wage mandate would have to be for all: Higgs

    Higgs said applying a wage mandate to all bargaining groups, whether they have signed contracts now or not, would protect the bill from a legal challenge. 

    "It would be for all unions, because it wouldn't be fair [otherwise]. That's my understanding legally. … We have to do it for everyone." 

    That would involve about 58,000 provincial employees, about 80 per cent of whom are represented by unions, he said.

    Higgs added that no union with a signed contract would see anything rolled back by a wage mandate. Any imposed package would be equal to or better than existing agreements.

    "I would feel obligated to provide those same terms and conditions to those that have settled," the premier said.

    Liberal Leader Roger Melanson said a back-to-work bill with a single wage mandate across the board is not the way to go. (Joe McDonald/CBC file photo)

    Melanson said a back-to-work bill with a single wage mandate across the board is not the way to go. 

    "Each group has different issues that they want to deal with, so that's why you get to the negotiating table and you discuss them. Negotiation is not a monologue, it's a dialogue."

    Green Leader David Coon said such a move would be "autocratic." 

    "It throws the whole notion of collective bargaining on its head, to be doing that by fiat, by legislated fiat. Not only is it unacceptable but I think it would be open to court challenges, no question."

    Higgs said Wednesday that a second-quarter fiscal projection for the 2021-22 financial year foresees a budget surplus of $200 million to $300 million, a fact that opposition parties seized on to argue the province can afford to make CUPE a better offer.

    The premier repeated that any contract has to be affordable for years to come, and it's not certain the province will have that much money to work with after this year.

    The Liberals also continued needling Higgs about whether his PC caucus is united behind his approach to negotiations.

    "There's a whole team of ministers and MLAs and we still don't know what they believe in this strike situation," Melanson said in question period. "What is his team actually doing to help him out?"

    Higgs said that "more than most," he's been open to different views in his government, but "at the end of the day, the premier does what he believes is right with the collection of information he has received from his caucus." 

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Jacques Poitras

    Provincial Affairs reporter

    Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

     https://www.institutionalinvestor.com/article/b14zbd8t83jtp3/following-dutch-model-new-brunswick-leads-canadas-pension-model-reforms

     

    Following Dutch Model, New Brunswick
    Leads Canada's Pension Model Reforms

    A new, risk-sharing pension design is taking off in Canada.

    Following Dutch Model, New Brunswick Leads Canada's Pension Model Reforms

    On May 31, 2012 David Alward stood before the Legislative Assembly of the Province of New Brunswick, Canada. As Premier, he was about to preside over an event unprecedented in the history of the province. It was the last day before the legislature’s summer recess and Alward, as host of the occasion, had invited representatives from all six New Brunswick labor unions onto the floor, along with members of both the Liberal and New Democratic opposition parties and a special task force he had appointed after his 2010 election. After more than a year of research, planning and negotiation, the unified group of labor and elected officials had an announcement to make. The subject du jour: pensions.

    The events of May 2012 have only just begun to be felt across the province and beyond its borders. Whereas many private companies and public jurisdictions have previously turned to employer-based, individual retirement savings plans as a solution to their employees’ future income needs, the citizens, politicians, union members and pension officials in New Brunswick sought and enacted a solution to providing real pension benefits that would be economically sound under 21st century conditions. Now throughout Canada, and beyond its borders, pension stakeholders are starting to take note.

    As the financial crisis of 2008 exploded, New Brunswick — which shares its western border with the U.S. State of Maine and its eastern border with the Atlantic Ocean — watched many of the public and private pension funds within its borders take a big hit. It soon became apparent that the usual Band Aid–type fixes, like increasing contributions into a plan, were not going to work this time.

    Honoring his campaign promise to find an industrial strength fix for pension underfunding, in late October 2010 Alward appointed a three-member task force to solve the problem. In a particularly politic move, the premier tapped well-respected labor attorney Susan Rowland and longtime actuary Paul McCrossan, a member of Alward’s Progressive Conservative party, to spearhead the effort. Economics professor and public policy research expert Pierre-Marcel Desjardins rounded out the team. After more than a year of studying pension systems around the globe, and identifying the Dutch system as their number one model, the New Brunswick Pension Task Force announced the details of a new pension scheme that would be “more secure, transparent, sustainable, reliable, affordable and predictable” than either a defined benefit or defined contribution plan. It was named the Shared Risk Pension.

    “Shared risk would fix most pension problems in North America,” asserts Rowland, chief of the pension task force. With the shared risk model, New Brunswick became the first jurisdiction in North America to develop comprehensive funding and risk management procedures in the administration of pensions, that cover both asset and liability management while addressing the challenges faced by pension schemes today and into the future, underlines the report entitled, “Rebuilding New Brunswick: The Case for Pension Reform.”

    The new pension model sports the best features of the Dutch pension system: pooled assets that are professionally managed; strict and predictable funding requirements; and risk management processes not previously a part of New Brunswick’s defined benefit plans. Like the Dutch plan — and the Wisconsin Retirement System in the U.S. — the shared risk plan is designed to self-correct according to the performance of its investment portfolio. That means that cost of living adjustments are eliminated in favor of a system of either “dividends” or reductions that change in concert with the annual portfolio asset size fluctuations.

    Alward began his quest for a better pension model after several forest and paper products companies, the biggest industry in New Brunswick, took a severe hit during the dip in the housing market brought on by the 2002 downturn and 2008 financial crisis. Companies like Fraser Papers (in 2010) and St. Anne-Nackawic Pulp Co. (in 2004) saw their pension promises go up in smoke as they entered bankruptcy. When pensioners had their monthly checks slashed by 30 to 40 percent, Canadians learned that a pension promise could be broken. Soon public pension deficits came to light as Moody’s Investor Services and Standard and Poor’s Rating Services downgraded New Brunswick’s credit rating in 2009 and 2010, respectively.

    One of the keys to making the new pension scheme a reality was the cooperation between political parties, public government and labor unions. “We adopted a collaborative approach to get it done,” explains task force member McCrossan. “When we designed the pension plan, the whole province took part in it,” adds the actuary who came back from his 2006 retirement twice: once to help the International Monetary Fund grapple with global pension issues ahead of the impending crisis and then again in 2010 when Alward appointed him to the pension task force. “The fear factor went away when we showed them the information,” agrees Michael O’Brien, a Fredericton city councillor and former finance committee chair, speaking about his own work with the unions and retirees.

    The City of Fredericton, home of the provincial government, has six separate pension funds, five of which initially chose to move to the new structure. Along with the pension of New Brunswick’s City of Saint John, the governance structure of the old plan has been entirely redesigned. In the City of Fredericton, the old defined benefit plan, which had been managed by the municipal government along with its other financial portfolios, is now, by law, the fiduciary responsibility of an independent board of eight trustees. The board members are an even split between council-appointees and union members.

    “Six union presidents came together in July 2010,” explains Wade Kierstead, president of CUPE 3864, known formally as the Canadian Union of Public Employees’ Technical and Professional Union for the City of Fredericton. That was when the city’s pension fund first raised serious flags. The $200 million City of Fredericton pension fund was found to be $59 million underfunded. It is one of the smaller plans; the largest, the New Brunswick government employee fund, stands at $5 billion in assets. Kierstead and his fellow union leaders got their members behind the change. There are sacrifices on both sides, employee and employer. For example, both will increase their contributions and a higher retirement age will be phased in over a 40-year period. Like Dutch pensions, the plans must be overfunded, in this case at 115 percent, to meet new legal requirements. “Everybody takes a little cut,” explains Jane Blakely, director of strategic direction and consulting for the City of Fredericton.

    To incorporate all the changes, the Canadian Pension Benefits Act had to be amended. So it was that on May 31, 2012, when the amendment was officially accepted, creating a Part 2 of the Act that made way for the new pension regime, that the entire legislature gave Alward, the union leaders, and the pension task force a well-deserved standing ovation for bringing about a change that protects the future retirement of the 47,000 public employees of the Province of New Brunswick.

    Looking forward, there are now plans in the pipeline, following the change over to the new scheme for most New Brunswick pensions, to amalgamate most of the plans into one, $10 billion pension plan. Outside New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale and Prince Edward Island Premier Robert Ghiz, are both studying the New Brunswick pension model.

    For Canada, the development and adoption of a pension plan for the 21st century proves that it is possible for a disparate group of pension stakeholders — legislators, labor unions, employees, pensioners, and citizens — to work together to ensure a secure retirement for public servants.

     

     https://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/news/news_release.2010.12.1849.html

     

    Pension task force members named

    FREDERICTON (CNB) – The three members of the Task Force on Protecting Pensions were named today by Justice and Consumer Affairs Minister Marie-Claude Blais.

    The task force, which was announced on Oct. 28, will lead public consultations and examine the long-term stability and security of private pensions in New Brunswick.

    The three members of the task force are Paul McCrossan, Susan Rowland and Pierre-Marcel Desjardins.

    "Employees deserve to know that the pensions they have contributed to all their working lives will be there when they retire,” said Blais. “Retirees need to know the pension they count on will continue to support them throughout retirement. That is why I am pleased we have been able to assemble such a qualified team of experts to undertake this important review."

    Among the issues that the task force will examine are:

    ●    rules protecting employees and pensioners;
    ●    ensuring that the long-term sustainability of pension promises made to workers is honoured and protected; and
    ●    reviewing the structure meant to protect pension plans to insure they are as effective as possible.

    "Our goal at the end of the review is to ensure New Brunswick has the rules and regulations in place that are needed to offer our residents the best protection possible for their hard-earned pension savings," said Blais.

    The task force brings extensive experience in the field of private pension administration and pension restructuring. The panel will report back to government with their findings and recommendations.

    Biographies of task force members

    Paul McCrossan

    Throughout his career as a consultant and actuary, McCrossan has held various positions with the Canadian Institute of Actuaries, the Society of Actuaries and the International Actuarial Association. He has written and lectured extensively on the topic of finances and pensions. Serving twice as a Member of Parliament, he was involved in the reform of a number of key pieces of pension-related legislation, including the Pension Benefits Standards Act and the Canada Pension Plan Act.  

    Susan Rowland

    A graduate of Osgoode Hall Law School, Rowland has focused her career on pension and benefits law, with particular expertise in the restructuring and funding of pension plans. Appointed as representative counsel by the Superintendent of Financial institutions for Ontario, she has assisted in resolving the under-funding of several high-profile pension plans, including: Algoma Steel, Ivaco Inc., General Motors of Canada and Chrysler Inc. Rowland has published numerous papers in professional journals and has been frequently invited to speak before groups interested in pension and insolvency issues.   

    Pierre-Marcel Desjardins

    Desjardins has a Ph.D. in economics and has been teaching economics at the Université de Moncton since 1990. He is also researcher at that Canadian Institute for Research on Public Policy and Public Administration. He is vice-president of the Fédération des caisses populaires acadiennes, the executive director of the Canadian Regional Science Association, a member of the board of directors of the Caisse populaire Kent-Sud, and a member of the advisory committee for the Sainte-Marie-de-Kent local service district.

     

    Paul Harpelle, communications, Department of Justice and Consumer Affairs, 506-453-6543, paul.harpelle@gnb.ca.


    https://www.linkedin.com/in/sue-rowland-226a2a83/?originalSubdomain=ca

    Sue Rowland

    Pension Consultant at Rowland Consulting
    Port Hope, Ontario, Canada Contact info

     


    N.B. government behind financial problems of CUPE pensions, ruling suggests

    $
    0
    0
     ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:33:39 +0000
    Subject: RE: Mr Richard pehaps Elizabeth MacPherson the lady lawyer I
    was just talking to will teach Higgy and his lawyers a lesson about
    Integrity
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
    Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:31:19 -0400
    Subject: Mr Richard pehaps Elizabeth MacPherson the lady lawyer I was
    just talking to will teach Higgy and his lawyers a lesson about
    Integrity
    To: AthenaDRS@gmail.com
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, rrichard
    <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    963prez@gmail.com

    http://lancasterhouse.com/arbitrators/show/id/366


    Elizabeth MacPherson

    Elizabeth MacPherson

     

    P.O. Box 5024
    Kemptville ON  K0G 1J0
    Tel: (506) 804-4724
    Alternate Tel: (613) 903-5594
    Email: AthenaDRS@gmail.com
    Website: www.AthenaDRS.ca


    Primary Jurisdiction

    New Brunswick

    Arbitration Practice

    In practice since 2015; bilingual (English and French); also active in the federal jurisdiction.

    Education

    LL.M., University of Ottawa, 2000; LL.B., University of Ottawa, 1992; B.A. (Industrial Relations), McGill University, 1971.

    Background

    Chairperson, Canada Industrial Relations Board, 2008-2014; Director General, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, 1999-2007; Executive Director & General Counsel, Canadian Artists and Producers Professional Relations Tribunal, 1993-1999; Conciliation/Mediation Officer, Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, Labour Canada, 1978-1993.

    Standard Fees for Cancellation

    No charge before a hearing is scheduled, if date of cancelled hearing is used for another hearing, or if notification is received more than one month before hearing date; daily charge if notification is received less than one month before hearing date.

    Lists and Panels

    Canada Industrial Relations Board external adjudicators panel; New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board list of arbitrators.

    Related Adjudication Experience

    Chairperson (part-time), New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board, 2015-2020; Chairperson, Canada Industrial Relations Board, 2008-2014.

    Associations

    National Academy of Arbitrators.

    Related Publications

    "Collective Bargaining for Independent Contractors: Is the Status of the Artist Act a Model for Other Industrial Sectors?" 17 Canadian Labour and Employment Law Journal 355 (author).

    Arbitrators are invited to send awards to decisions@lancasterhouse.com. In an effort to facilitate access to justice, Lancaster House forwards all awards it receives from arbitrators to CanLII.

     
     
     
     
     

    Talks resume in Aliant strike

    Representatives from Atlantic Canada's largest telecommunications company and its 4,300 striking employees returned to the negotiating table Monday, restarting talks to end the four-month-old strike.

    Union and management representatives of Aliant met with federal mediator Elizabeth MacPherson at an undisclosed location in Halifax. It's their first face-to-face meeting since talks broke off after just two days of negotiations in mid-July.

    The meeting started at 10 a.m. and ended in the late afternoon, with plans to resume talks Tuesday.

    Federal Labour Minister Joe Fontana called the two sides back to the table on Friday.

    Union representative Dean MacDonald said he's optimistic going into another round of talks with Aliant.

    "Maybe with a bunch of different faces at the table, a new set of ears and a new set of eyes – may come up with something different," he said.

    About 2,200 managers have been doing the work of the striking employees.

    Aliant is majority-owned by Bell Canada and provides phone, internet and other communications services to about two million residential customers and 80,000 businesses in Atlantic Canada. It owns the major telecom providers in all four Atlantic provinces.

    Employees are in dispute with the company over job security, pay, hours of work and benefits. They also want better health-care and pension benefits as well as limits on contracting out.

    Last month, Jay Forbes, the president of Aliant, said the strike had already cost the company $13 million.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
     
     
     
     

    Fundy Royal campaign targets middle class with focus on jobs

    Fundy Royal voters have elected Conservatives all but 1 time in 28 elections over 101 years

    CBC News · Posted: Oct 17, 2015 6:00 AM AT
     
     
    View the profile of "David Amos"
    David Amos 
    I must Say I am rather impressed at CBC's sudden fit of Integrity to allow my posts to stand the test of time for a few hours at least. (: Rest assured that I have been saving digital snapshots just in case they delete and block me as usual :)

    In return here is an old scoop about CTV that CBC and everybody else and his dog has been ignoring for 11 very long years after I ran in the election of the 38th Parliament against the aptly named lawyer Rob Moore.

    http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/re-bce-and-jean-pierre-blais-of-crtc.html

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: martine.turcotte@bell.ca
    To: motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
    Cc: bcecomms@bce.ca ; W-Five@ctv.ca
    Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2004 9:28 AM
    Subject: RE: I am curious

    Mr. Amos, I confirm that I have received your documentation. There is
    no need to send us a hard copy. As you have said yourself, the
    documentation is very voluminous and after 3 days, we are still in the
    process of printing it. I have asked one of my lawyers to review it
    in my absence and report back to me upon my return in the office. We
    will then provide you with a reply.

    Martine Turcotte
    Chief Legal Officer / Chef principal du service juridique
    BCE Inc. / Bell Canada
    1000 de La Gauchetière ouest, bureau 3700
    Montréal (Qc) H3B 4Y7

    Tel: (514) 870-4637
    Fax: (514) 870-4877
    email: martine.turcotte@bell.ca

    Executive Assistant / Assistante à la haute direction: Diane Valade
    Tel: (514) 870-4638
    email: diane.valade@bell.ca
     
     
     
     

    N.B. government behind financial problems of CUPE pensions, ruling suggests

    Province ordered to fix $69.2 million funding shortfall

    In a decision issued June 28, experienced national labour arbitrator Elizabeth MacPherson found the province failed to meet its obligation to fully fund the pension of CUPE Local 1253, representing about 1,900 New Brunswick school custodians, maintenance workers and school bus drivers, over several years.  

    That helped drive it into a $69.2 million deficit as of Jan. 1, 2018, its last full actuarial evaluation.

    CUPE president Stephen Drost says members of locals 2745 and 1253 have made all of their required pension contributions and are not responsible for their poor financial condition. (Jacques Poitras/CBC News)

    In her ruling, MacPherson ordered the government to begin paying $5.5 million per year as part of a 15-year plan to fix a deterioration in the pension that years of underfunding caused.

    "I find that by failing to make the contributions to the Plan necessary to fund the going concern deficit identified by the Actuaries, the Employer has breached the collective agreement," wrote MacPherson, the former chair of the Canada Industrial Relations Board, first appointed in 2007 by the former government of Stephen Harper.  

    "As remedy for the breach, the Employer is directed to commence making regular contributions to the Plan in accordance with the 2018 Actuarial Valuation in amounts sufficient to eliminate the going concern deficit within 15 years."  

    MacPherson noted the figure of $5.5 million per year was an estimate from 2018 of what is required to fix the pension shortfall and may have to be updated when a 2021 actuarial valuation of the deficit is made available.

    She is in private practice now in Ontario and was jointly picked by the province and CUPE to rule on the dispute, which came forward as a union grievance in 2018

    Another grievance to be heard

    A second nearly identical grievance filed by CUPE Local 2745, the union representing school administrative staff, also alleges government wrongly starved its pension plan of millions of dollars in required contributions.

    That grievance is scheduled to be heard next year.

    Higgs has been criticizing the financial condition of both pensions, which are two of only three defined benefit plans left among New Brunswick government employees. The third plan belongs to provincial court judges.

    Defined benefit plans guarantee employees agreed-upon amounts of retirement income and benefits. Although employees and the employer both contribute to a pension fund to pay those costs, any unexpected shortfall is a financial responsibility of the employer alone.

    Most New Brunswick government unions were moved from defined benefit to "targeted benefit" pension plans in 2014,  but the two CUPE locals had special wording in their collective agreements that blocked the province from switching them over.

    Workers are among lowest paid 

    The two plans serve employees who are among the lowest paid in government.  

    According to the province's latest financial statements, members of the two unions make an average of just under $36,000 per year with retired members of CUPE Local 2745 earning average annual pensions of $8,724. Average pensions of former CUPE Local 1253 members are $11,979.

    "They are no way a gold-plated pension plan," said Theresa McAllister, president of Local 2745.

    The pension plans have been depicted as financial wrecks in government messaging as part of an effort to pressure the two unions to give them up for cheaper retirement plans with benefits the province does not have to guarantee.

    Theresa McAllister (in pink sweater) is president of CUPE Local 2745, whose members, she says, earn under $36,000 on average, with retirees collecting average annual pensions under $9,000. (CBC)

    In government news releases, the plans are described as being unsustainable and in financial "jeopardy" and last week Higgs told the legislature that winning changes to the two plans was a key government goal in its current labour fight with multiple CUPE unions

     "That is one of the stalemates in the CUPE discussion," he said

    Largely government's doing

    Both pension funds are in a serious deficit position, but according to MacPherson's account of what happened to the CUPE 1253 pension, this is largely government's doing for unilaterally failing to make regular "special payments" to keep the plans fully funded as it is required to do. 

    MacPherson said special payments are typical in defined benefit plans.

    Iris Lloyd is President of Local 1253 and said evidence gathered by the union and presented to MacPherson showed that as a deficit appeared in the plan following the financial crash of 2008, regular special payments from the province began but then suddenly stopped in 2013.  

    Higgs was minister of finance at the time and the end of special payments triggered a downward spiral in the pension's financial position from which it has not recovered.    

    New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs says a decision from a labour arbitrator that the province owes CUPE 1253's pension plan $69.2 million is not why he's pushing for the plan to be changed. (Government of New Brunswick)

    The former government of Brian Gallant did make a $10.1 million retroactive payment in 2018 to try to shore up the plan but it remains in a significant hole.

    "Premier Higgs back in 2013 decided to stop making payments into our pension plan and therefore we were able to prove that he purposely underfunded our pension plan by that $69.2 million," Lloyd said in an interview. 

    "You really have to talk to Premier Higgs about why these plans are in the shape they are in." 

    In her decision, MacPherson said the province was wrong to withhold special payments from the plan that were needed for it to remain financially healthy.

    "Because this is a collectively bargained pension plan, the Employer is not free to simply ignore or amend the provisions of the Plan text or otherwise act unilaterally, as it has been able to do with pension plans applicable to other bargaining units that are solely controlled by the Employer," MacPherson wrote. 

    "Any changes to this Plan, including the parties' respective obligations under the Plan, must be negotiated by the Employer and the Union."

    Future of arbitration case

    The province has filed for a judicial review of MacPherson's decision. 

    Asked Monday about MacPherson's ruling, Higgs said it is unclear who is to blame for the two pensions' poor financial position.  

    "We can all have our different views on whether it was funded properly or not, but I'm not an actuary," said Higgs.

    He also denied his goal in changing the pension plans is to escape the expense of MacPherson's funding order. 

    "Absolutely not." he said

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Roger Richard <rrichard@nb.aibn.com>
    Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 17:50:56 -0400
    Subject: Re: Oh My My I read the news about Erin O'Toole et al in CBC
    again today Deja Vu Anyone???
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Cc: george.chahal@parl.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
    <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, kingpatrick278
    <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, "Kevin.leahy"
    <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "freedomreport.ca"
    <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, Viva Frei <david@vivafrei.com>,
    sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
    <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
    oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, Office of the Premier
    <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER
    <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, motomaniac333
    <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Sean.Fraser"<Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca>,
    "Seamus.ORegan"<Seamus.ORegan@parl.gc.ca>, premier
    <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier
    <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>

    Mr. Amos,

    Please explain very slowly this: "This Judge understnds the meaning of
    the word Integrity ».  What the word integrity means now a day?

    Thanks,

    Roger.


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:44:33 +0000
    Subject: RE: Oh My My I read the news about Erin O'Toole et al in CBC
    again today Deja Vu Anyone???
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Thank you for taking the time to write.

    Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
    to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
    at the earliest opportunity.

    If your inquiry more appropriately falls within the mandate of a
    Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer your email for
    review and consideration.

    Merci d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    En raison du volume des messages reçus, cette réponse automatique vous
    informe que votre courriel a été reçu et sera examiné dans les
    meilleurs délais.

    Si votre demande relève plutôt du mandat d'un ministère ou d'un autre
    secteur du gouvernement, le personnel vous renverra votre courriel
    pour examen et considération.


    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144 or by email
    media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
    Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>


    > Le 9 nov. 2021 à 16:08, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> a écrit :
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: "O'Toole, Erin - M.P."<Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 19:41:29 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My I read the news about Erin O'Toole
    > et al in CBC again today Deja Vu Anyone???
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > On behalf of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, thank you for contacting the
    > Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.
    >
    > Mr. O’Toole greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read
    > and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account
    > receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as
    > possible.
    >
    > If you are a constituent of Mr. O’Toole’s in Durham with an urgent
    > matter please contact his constituency office at:
    >
    > Office of Erin O’Toole, M.P.
    > 54 King Street East, Suite 103
    > Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N3
    > Tel: (905) 697-1699 or Toll-Free (866) 436-1141
    >
    > Once again, thank you for writing.
    >
    > Sincerely,
    >
    >
    >
    > Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition
    >
    > ------------------------------
    ----------------------------------------------
    >
    > Au nom de l’hon. Erin O’Toole, merci de communiquer avec le Bureau du
    > chef de l’Opposition officielle.
    >
    > M. O’Toole apprécie beaucoup le point de vue et les commentaires des
    > Canadiens et des Canadiennes. Nous lisons tous les courriels que nous
    > recevons. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels.
    > Nous y répondons le plus rapidement possible.
    >
    > Si vous êtes un électeur ou une électrice de M. O’Toole dans la
    > circonscription de Durham et que vous avez une question urgente,
    > veuillez communiquer avec son bureau de circonscription, au :
    >
    > Bureau d’Erin O’Toole, député
    > 54, rue King Est, bureau 103
    > Bowmanville (Ontario) L1C 1N3
    > Tél. : (905) 697-1699 ou sans frais : (866) 436-1141
    >
    > Encore une fois merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.
    >
    > Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,
    >
    >
    >
    > Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2021 15:40:53 -0400
    > Subject: Oh My My I read the news about Erin O'Toole et al in CBC
    > again today Deja Vu Anyone???
    > To: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
    > Pablo.Rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca,
    > Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca, Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca,
    > Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca, Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca,
    > Annie.Koutrakis@parl.gc.ca, Emmanuella.Lambropoulos@parl.gc.ca,
    > Patricia.Lattanzio@parl.gc.ca, Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca,
    > Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca, Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl.gc.ca,
    > Sherry.Romanado@parl.gc.ca, Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca,
    > Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca, Sameer.Zuberi@parl.gc.ca,
    > Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca,
    > mike.lake@parl.gc.ca, Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca,
    > chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca, Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca,
    > Arnold.Viersen@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca,
    > blake.richards@parl.gc.ca, blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca,
    > Shannon.Stubbs@parl.gc.ca, Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca
    > Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, "Michelle.Boutin"
    > <Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Info@gg.ca,
    > fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, "pierre.poilievre"
    > <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca,
    > jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca, erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca, john.tasker@cbc.ca
    >
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/otoole-shadow-cabinet-shuffle-1.6242300
    >
    >
    > O'Toole leaves MPs who questioned vaccine policy out of his shadow cabinet
    >
    > Poilievre appointed finance critic, Rempel Garner out at health in
    > Conservative shadow-cabinet shuffle
    > John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Nov 09, 2021 9:07 AM ET | Last
    > Updated: 16 minutes ago
    >
    > Conservative Leader Erin O’Toole holds a news conference on Parliament
    > Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Nov. 9, 2021. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian
    > Press)
    >
    > Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole announced his shadow cabinet today —
    > the critics who will stare down Liberal ministers in the House of
    > Commons and press for answers on key files.
    >
    > Notably absent from the critics' list are MPs who have voiced
    > opposition to COVID-19 vaccine policies.
    >
    > Newly elected MP and former Conservative leadership contender Leslyn
    > Lewis, long-time MP Marilyn Gladu and Saskatchewan MP Rosemarie Falk
    > have been left on the Conservative backbench without a prominent role
    > in the next Parliament.
    >
    > Lewis has criticized COVID-19 vaccinations for children. Gladu
    > recently took on a role with a new "civil liberties" working group of
    > parliamentarians concerned about vaccinate mandates. Falk has
    > expressed opposition to what she has called "mandatory vaccinations."
    >
    > Gladu and Falk served previously in O'Toole's pre-election shadow
    > cabinet as critics for the Queen's Privy Council and seniors
    > respectively. Gladu, who made waves recently by comparing COVID-19 to
    > polio, also served previously as the party's health critic under
    > former leader Andrew Scheer.
    >
    >    O'Toole concedes some Conservative MPs have caused 'confusion' over vaccines
    >
    > B.C. MP Mark Strahl, who said last month in a social media post that
    > vaccine mandates are "discriminatory, coercive and must be opposed,"
    > has lost his job as the party's shadow minister for labour.
    >
    > Ontario MP Dean Allison, the host of an online show that has featured
    > vaccine skeptics as guests, has been left out of the shadow cabinet,
    > although he didn't have a role on O'Toole's team before the September
    > federal election.
    >
    > Asked what he would do about MPs who have questioned public health
    > guidance or government directives on vaccines, O'Toole said his
    > choices for the shadow cabinet reflect how he feels about the issue.
    >
    > "We selected experienced MPs who are prepared to fight inflation,
    > prepared to fight the Liberal-NDP coalition and also to address
    > vaccine hesitancy. It's very important for leaders in our shadow
    > cabinet to play that role and that's why I made choices like the ones
    > I just announced," O'Toole said in French.
    > Former leadership candidates on backbench
    >
    > Lewis, who has strong support from the social conservative wing of the
    > party, ran a close third place in last year's leadership race.
    > Newly elected Conservative MP Leslyn Lewis adjusts her mask as she
    > arrives for a caucus meeting. Lewis was left out of Conservative
    > Leader Erin O'Toole's shadow cabinet. (Adrian Wyld/Canadian Press)
    >
    > One of the few people of colour elected under the Conservative banner,
    > Lewis has said Canadian children are being "used as shields for
    > adults" and has vowed to stand against the deployment of COVID-19
    > shots in kids. Most health experts say vaccine coverage in this
    > younger cohort will help Canada achieve some form of herd immunity
    > against the virus.
    >
    >    O'Toole attacks Trudeau's 'inexperienced' cabinet as a threat to
    > national unity
    >
    > Gladu also ran for the party's leadership but failed to gain enough
    > early support to get her name on the final ballot.
    >
    > She is a member of a group of Conservative parliamentarians who
    > recently formed what they call a "civil liberties" working group to
    > advocate for the unvaccinated. While promoting the group's work during
    > an appearance on CTV, Gladu suggested that polio — a disease largely
    > eradicated in Canada through vaccinations — posed more of a threat
    > than COVID-19.
    >
    > Gladu also said "multiple sources of data" must be reviewed to
    > determine if vaccine mandates actually work to curb the spread of the
    > virus. She said asking people to disclose their vaccination status is
    > a slippery slope that could lead to "discrimination" against people
    > with other health conditions.
    >
    > WATCH | Conservative MPs form 'mini-caucus' to talk about
    > vaccine-related issues:
    > Conservative MPs forming ‘mini-caucus’ to talk about vaccine-related issues
    > 4 days ago
    > 11:20
    >
    > Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu, who is spearheading the initiative,
    > joins Power & Politics to discuss how some Conservatives are forming a
    > team within caucus to tackle what they're calling civil liberties
    > issues related to vaccination. 11:20
    >
    > After the shadow cabinet positions were announced today, Gladu issued
    > a statement to the media retracting her comments.
    >
    > "I would like to apologize for my inappropriate comments about
    > COVID-19 vaccines during a recent CTV interview. Upon reflection, I
    > recognize how dangerous it is to share misinformation about the
    > severity of COVID-19 and the safety and efficacy of vaccines. I
    > retract these comments in full," Gladu said.
    >
    > "I apologize unreservedly to Canadians. I also apologize to my caucus
    > colleagues and Leader for the distraction my comments have created."
    > Experienced MPs take on top critic roles
    >
    > Ontario MP Pierre Poilievre is back as the party's finance critic.
    > Known as a hard-charging parliamentarian, Poilievre was swapped out of
    > that role by O'Toole before the last election.
    >
    > He's back now, O'Toole said, because the Conservatives are intent on
    > holding the government's feet to the fire over its perceived
    > mishandling of inflation. The pandemic, massive government spending
    > and constrained supply chains have caused prices to spike, a
    > phenomenon that makes the cost of living higher for everyone.
    > Conservative MP Pierre Poilievre will serve as the party's finance
    > critic. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)
    >
    > "As you know, Pierre is one of our strongest communicators. He's tough
    > in the House. I see Liberals quiver when he rises to his feet, whether
    > it's on the WE Charity scandal or other issues," O'Toole said.
    >
    > "The big risk facing our country is inflation — the highest rate in 20
    > years. So, I want Mr. Trudeau and Ms. Freeland worried about their
    > complacency, their overspending and that NDP coalition," O'Toole said,
    > citing media reports suggesting the Liberals and NDP are in talks over
    > some sort of cooperation agreement ahead of Parliament's return on
    > Nov. 22. "They can buy Jagmeet Singh's silence. They cannot buy ours
    > or Pierre's."
    >
    > Poilievre's replacement as finance critic, B.C. MP Ed Fast, will serve
    > as the party's industry, innovation and science critic. O'Toole said
    > the job change was not a criticism of Fast personally. "I'm a big fan
    > of Ed Fast," O'Toole said.
    >
    >    Erin O'Toole says he has enough Conservative caucus support to
    > stay on as leader
    >
    > Alberta MP Michelle Rempel Garner, who was a sharp critic of the
    > government's pandemic response, has been shuffled out of her role as
    > health critic and into the natural resources portfolio.
    >
    > A skilled communicator, Rempel Garner will take on Environment
    > Minister Steven Guilbeault and Natural Resources Minister Jonathan
    > Wilkinson, two Liberal ministers who have been tasked with reshaping
    > Canada's climate policy as the country strives to dramatically slash
    > greenhouse gas emissions by some 40 to 45 per cent by the end of the
    > decade.
    >
    > Last week at the COP26 climate summit in Glasgow, Prime Minister
    > Justin Trudeau promised to put a cap on emissions from the oil and gas
    > sector, which could have long-term consequences for jobs and growth in
    > Alberta's oil patch.
    >
    > "We actually want the country to succeed. We want to reduce emissions
    > but not by shutting down an entire sector of the economy when we need
    > them the most," O'Toole said.
    >
    > "So, you're going to see a mixture of experienced, talented and new
    > voices proposing an economic future that I think Canadians will be
    > desperate for by the time the next election comes."
    >
    > Alberta MP Shannon Stubbs, who voiced concerns about O'Toole's
    > leadership after the September election, is also out as the party's
    > shadow minister for public safety.
    >
    > Stubbs told reporters ahead of the first post-election caucus meeting
    > that she was concerned about the party's shift to the centre under
    > O'Toole, criticizing his election flip-flop on firearms in particular.
    >
    > ABOUT THE AUTHOR
    > John Paul Tasker
    >
    > Parliamentary Bureau
    >
    > J.P. Tasker is a senior writer in the CBC's parliamentary bureau in
    > Ottawa. He can be reached at john.tasker@cbc.ca.
    >
    >    Follow J.P. on Twitter
    >
    > CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:04:55 -0400
    > Subject: Fwd: Anybody know who the Governor General is these days???
    > Methinks if Trudeau the Younger wants a writ dropped somebody has to
    > do the dirty deed N'esy Pas?
    > To: Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
    > Pablo.Rodriguez@parl.gc.ca, francis.scarpaleggia@parl.gc.ca,
    > Steven.MacKinnon@parl.gc.ca, Marc.Miller@parl.gc.ca,
    > Yves.Robillard@parl.gc.ca, Angelo.Iacono@parl.gc.ca,
    > Annie.Koutrakis@parl.gc.ca, Emmanuella.Lambropoulos@parl.gc.ca,
    > Patricia.Lattanzio@parl.gc.ca, Stephane.Lauzon@parl.gc.ca,
    > Joel.Lightbound@parl.gc.ca, Soraya.MartinezFerrada@parl.gc.ca,
    > Sherry.Romanado@parl.gc.ca, Peter.Schiefke@parl.gc.ca,
    > Brenda.Shanahan@parl.gc.ca, Sameer.Zuberi@parl.gc.ca
    > Cc: Michelle.Rempel@parl.gc.ca, Tim.Uppal@parl.gc.ca,
    > mike.lake@parl.gc.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
    > Ron.Liepert@parl.gc.ca, chris.warkentin@parl.gc.ca,
    > Len.Webber@parl.gc.ca, Arnold.Viersen@parl.gc.ca,
    > Martin.Shields@parl.gc.ca, blake.richards@parl.gc.ca,
    > blaine.calkins@parl.gc.ca, Shannon.Stubbs@parl.gc.ca,
    > Gerald.Soroka@parl.gc.ca
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Info <Info@gg.ca>
    > Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 21:26:28 +0000
    > Subject: OSGG General Inquiries / Demande de renseignements généraux au BSGG
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor
    > General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses
    > to specific inquiries can be expected within three weeks. Please note
    > that general comments and opinions may not receive a response.
    >
    > *****
    >
    > Nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit au Bureau du secrétaire du
    > gouverneur général. Nous aimons prendre connaissance de vos points de
    > vue et de vos suggestions. Il faut allouer trois semaines pour
    > recevoir une réponse à une demande précise. Veuillez noter que nous ne
    > donnons pas nécessairement suite aux opinions et aux commentaires
    > généraux.
    >
    >
    > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message may contain confidential or privileged
    > information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are
    > not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
    > copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately if you have
    > received this email by mistake and delete it from your system.
    >
    > AVIS IMPORTANT : Le présent courriel peut contenir des renseignements
    > confidentiels et est strictement réservé à l’usage de la personne à
    > qui il est destiné. Si vous n’êtes pas la personne visée, vous ne
    > devez pas diffuser, distribuer ou copier ce courriel. Merci de nous en
    > aviser immédiatement et de supprimer ce courriel s’il vous a été
    > envoyé par erreur.
    >
    > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLiVYvRCavs
    >
    > Here's why Erin O'Toole fired Pierre Poilievre
    > 119,253 views
    > Feb 11, 2021
    > Rebel News
    > 1.45M subscribers
    > Why would Erin O'Toole, the leader of the Conservative Party of
    > Canada, fire his most popular MP, Pierre Poilievre?
    > READ MORE ► https://rebelne.ws/2LEk3G2
    >
    > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47jfqjujJ_o&ab_channel=RebelNews
    >
    > Elections Canada fines Ezra Levant $3,000 for book comparing Trudeau
    > to Tony Soprano
    > 51,226 views
    > Jan 22, 2021
    > Rebel News
    > 1.45M subscribers
    > ►Help fund our constitutional challenge against the Trudeau
    > government: http://www.SaveRebelNews.com
    > Justin Trudeau's Elections Commissioner convicted us! Elections Canada
    > just fined Ezra Levant $3,000 for writing a book comparing Justin
    > Trudeau to Tony Soprano!
    >
    > ►You can watch and read all of our stories from our battle with the
    > elections commissioners at: http://rebelne.ws/saverebelnews
    >
    >
    > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V__GmSk24qw&t=381s&ab_channel=RebelNews
    >
    > HIDDEN CAMERA: Police interrogated me about my Justin Trudeau book.
    > They didn’t know I videotaped it
    > 873,421 views
    > •Jan 29, 2020
    > Rebel News
    > 1.45M subscribers
    > http://www.SaveRebelNews.com​ I wrote a best-selling book about Justin
    > Trudeau in the last election. After the election, I received a letter
    > by registered mail notifying me that I was being investigated for that
    > book. Trudeau’s elections commissioner claimed it was an illegal
    > campaign activity and demanded that I submit to an interrogation. So I
    > went to Elections Canada’s Ottawa headquarters last week, where I was
    > grilled for an hour by two 30-year veterans of the RCMP — and they
    > refused to rule out a police raid on Rebel News headquarters!
    >
    >
    >
    > http://www.goc411.ca/en/116134/Yves-Cote
    >
    > Yves Côté works as Commissioner of Canada Elections for Office of the
    > Chief Electoral Officer.
    > Yves can be reached at 819-939-2060
    >
    > Yves Côté's team
    >
    > Tim Mackin works as Investigator under contract for Office of the
    > Chief Electoral Officer.
    > Tim can be reached at 819-934-2935
    >
    > John Dickson works as Investigator under contract for Office of the
    > Chief Electoral Officer.
    > John can be reached at 819-939-2068
    >
    >
    >
    > http://www.goc411.ca/en/90401/Mylene-Gigou
    >
    > Mylène Gigou works as Director of Investigations for Office of the
    > Chief Electoral Officer.
    > Mylène can be reached at 819-939-2253
    >
    > Mylène Gigou's team
    >
    > Paul Couture works as Senior Investigator for Office of the Chief
    > Electoral Officer.
    > Paul can be reached at 819-939-2075
    >
    > Ronald Lamothe works as Senior Investigator for Office of the Chief
    > Electoral Officer.
    > Ronald can be reached at 819-939-2073
    >
    > Réjean Labonté works as Senior Investigator for Office of the Chief
    > Electoral Officer.
    > Réjean can be reached at 819-939-2072
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca
    >> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:24 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e
    >> since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament
    >> and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should
    >> finally call me back N'esy Pas?
    >> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    >>
    >> The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be
    >> reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
    >>
    >> Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre.
    >> Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
    >>
    >> Art McD
    >> He/Him // Il/Lui
    >> Admiral/amiral Art McDonald
    >>
    >> Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS)
    >> Canadian Armed Forces
    >> art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<
    mailto:art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca> / Tel:
    >> 613-992-5054
    >>
    >> Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD)
    >> Forces armées canadiennes
    >> art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<
    mailto:art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca> / Tél:
    >> 613-992-5054
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:08:16 -0400
    >> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when I
    >> was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the Queen
    >> in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should finally call me back
    >> N'esy Pas?
    >> To: art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca,
    >> JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
    >> Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
    >> Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
    >> Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >> clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
    >> michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
    >> dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    >> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca,
    >> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, "andrea.anderson-mason"
    >> <andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
    , Ramesh.Sangha@parl.gc.ca,
    >> Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
    >> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
    >> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
    >> Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips
    >> <news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
    >> ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca
    >>
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
    >> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:09 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON
    >> STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
    >> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    >>
    >> Admiral Art McDonald is now the Chief of the Defence Staff, he may be
    >> reached at art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. I will continue to monitor this
    >> account periodically until my retirement from the Canadian Armed
    >> Forces. Please reach out to EA CDS, LCol Richard Jolette at
    >> richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca if you require to get a hold of me.
    >>
    >> L'amiral Art McDonald est maintenant le Chef d'état-major de la
    >> Défense, on peut le joindre au art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. Je
    >> continuerai de surveiller ce compte périodiquement jusqu'à ma retraite
    >> des Forces armées canadiennes. Veuillez contacter CdeC CEMD, Lcol
    >> Richard Jolette au richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca si vous avez besoin de
    >> me contacter.
    >>
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
    >> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    >> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:23 +0000
    >> Subject: RE: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
    >> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
    >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    >> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    >> comments.
    >> Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
    >> any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
    >> on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
    >> Government of Canada website at
    >> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
    >> calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
    >>
    >> Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
    >> Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
    >> En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
    >> que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
    >> Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
    >> économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
    >> le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
    >> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
    >> composant le
    >> 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
    >>
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
    >> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    >> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:27 +0000
    >> Subject: RE: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when
    >> I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the
    >> Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should finally call me
    >> back N'esy Pas?
    >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    >> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    >> comments.
    >> Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
    >> any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
    >> on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
    >> Government of Canada website at
    >> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
    >> calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.
    >>
    >> Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
    >> Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
    >> En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
    >> que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
    >> Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
    >> économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
    >> le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
    >> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
    >> composant le
    >> 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.
    >>
    >>
    >> ---------- Original message ----------
    >> From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    >> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:22 +0000
    >> Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e
    >> since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament
    >> and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should
    >> finally call me back N'esy Pas?
    >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> Thank you for taking the time to write to us.
    >>
    >> Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
    >> that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
    >> understanding.
    >>
    >> If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
    >> visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
    >>
    >> If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    >> (506) 453-2144.
    >>
    >> Thank you.
    >>
    >>
    >> Bonjour,
    >>
    >> Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.
    >>
    >> Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
    >> quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
    >> Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.
    >>
    >> Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
    >> veuillez visiter
    >> www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.
    >>
    >> S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    >> Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.
    >>
    >> Merci.
    >>
    >>
    >> Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    >> P.O Box/C. P. 6000
    >> Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
    Brunswick
    >> E3B 5H1
    >> Canada
    >> Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    >> Email/Courriel:
    >> premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:35:27 -0400
    >>> Subject: Re: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
    >>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
    >>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>
    >>> Cc: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca, "erin.otoole"<erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
    >>> "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
    >>> <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
    >>> "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
    >>>
    >>> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/fifth-estate-military-justice-1.5943931
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Prosecuting high-ranking officers a 'significant challenge'
    >>>
    >>> "Retired colonel and lawyer Michel Drapeau, who is a leading expert in
    >>> military justice, said he wonders how a court martial could hear a
    >>> case involving Vance or McDonald when no one in the military,
    >>> including judges, would outrank them."
    >>>
    >>> PERHAPS I SHOULD SUE THEM EH???
    >>>
    >>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>> Byrne Furlong
    >>>> Press Secretary
    >>>> Office of the Minister of National Defence
    >>>> 613-996-3100
    >>>>
    >>>> Media Relations
    >>>> Department of National Defence
    >>>> 613-996-2353
    >>>> mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
    >>>>
    >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:14:23 -0300
    >>>> Subject: Fwd: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
    >>>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
    >>>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, Walter.Semianiw@mdlo.ca, Newsroom
    >>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    >>>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>
    >>>> Peter Stoffer
    >>>> STRATEGIC ADVISOR
    >>>>
    >>>> (613) 236-2657 x200
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Mr. Stoffer served as a Member of Parliament for the riding of
    >>>> Sackville-Eastern Shore from 1997 to 2015. During 2011-2015, he served
    >>>> as the Official Opposition Critic for Veterans Affairs.
    >>>>
    >>>> During this time, Mr. Stoffer was honoured with a variety of awards
    >>>> from the environmental, military, provincial and federal communities.
    >>>> He was named Canada’s Parliamentarian of the year 2013, and he
    >>>> received the Veterans Ombudsman award. Mr Stoffer has been knighted
    >>>> into the Order of St. George and has also been knighted by the King of
    >>>> the Netherlands into the Order of Orange Nassau.
    >>>>
    >>>> He is currently volunteering for a variety of veteran organizations.
    >>>> He is also host to a radio show called “Hour of Heroes in Nova Scotia”
    >>>> on Community Radio,  Radio Station 97-5 CIOE-FM, the Voice of the East
    >>>> Coast Music.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Colonel-Maître® Michel William Drapeau
    >>>> SENIOR COUNSEL
    >>>> (613) 236-2657 x200
    >>>> Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:43:40 -0300
    >>>> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO
    >>>> dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
    >>>> To: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"
    >>>> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
    >>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, mcu
    >>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, ombudsman-communications@forces.gc.ca,
    >>>> "Paul.Shuttle"<Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
    >>>>
    >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
    >>>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:38:01 +0000
    >>>> Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM / SPAM SUSPECT] A little
    >>>> Deja Vu for JONATHAN.VANCE et al
    >>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>>>
    >>>> Good day,
    >>>>
    >>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
    >>>> has not been forwarded.
    >>>>
    >>>> Please forward your email to: stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
    >>>>
    >>>> Thank you in advance,
    >>>>
    >>>> MJS
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
    >>>>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
    >>>>> drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
    >>>>> Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
    >>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Good day,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
    >>>>> has not been forwarded.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
    >>>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:35 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
    >>>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
    >>>>> speech     contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
    >>>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
    >>>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I will be out of the office until 23 February 2016. I am unable to
    >>>>> monitor my e-mail during this time. For urgent matters, please contact
    >>>>> my Chief of Staff, BGen Tammy Harris (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), or
    >>>>> my EA, Maj Cedric Aspirault (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
    ) both of
    >>>>> whom can contact me.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 février 2016. Il ne me sera pas
    >>>>> possible de vérifier mes couriels pendant cette période. En cas
    >>>>> d'urgence, veuillez contacter ma chef d'état major, Bgén Tammy Harris
    >>>>> (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), ou mon CdC, le maj Cédric Aspirault
    >>>>> (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
    ), ils seront en mesure de me rejoindre.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: "Chisholm, Jill"<Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
    >>>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:34 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
    >>>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
    >>>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
    >>>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
    >>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until
    >>>>> Friday, February 26, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently
    >>>>> during this time.  Should you require assistance please contact
    >>>>> Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996.  Otherwise I will be pleased to
    >>>>> respond to your message upon my return.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
    >>>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
    >>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:46:28 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YOr Ralph Goodale Methinks this should
    >>>>> stress the Integrity of the Globe and Mail and your minions in the
    >>>>> RCMP N'esy Pas?
    >>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
    >>>>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
    >>>>> Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read
    >>>>> with
    >>>>> care.
    >>>>> However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21,
    >>>>> there may be a delay in processing your email.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ______________________________
    ___________________________________
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
    >>>>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
    >>>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera
    >>>>> lu avec soin.
    >>>>> Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain,
    >>>>> veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le
    >>>>> traitement de votre courriel.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Oreiginal message ----------
    >>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:02:10 -0300
    >>>>> Subject: A little Deja Vu for Ralph Goodale and the RCMP before I file
    >>>>> my next lawsuit as promised
    >>>>> To: Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
    >>>>> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
    >>>>> Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.cabarbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >>>>> elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
    >>>>> Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, "clare.barry"
    >>>>> clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
    >>>>> alaina@alainalockhart.ca, info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca,
    >>>>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca,
    >>>>> info@waynelong.ca, matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca,
    >>>>> pat@patfinnigan.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, tj@tjharvey.ca,
    >>>>> karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com, votejohnw@gmail.com,
    >>>>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
    , Frank.McKenna@td.com, postur@for.is,
    >>>>> postur@fjr.stjr.is, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
    >>>>> Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >>>>> David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >>>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dave.Young@nbeub.cajfurey@nbpower.com,
    >>>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, postur@irr.is, birgittajoy@gmail.com,
    >>>>> birgitta@this.is>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >>>>> Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, Yves.Cote@elections.ca, Greg.Bonnar@gnb.ca
    >>>>> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
    >>>>> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, hon.melanie.joly@canada.ca
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
    >>>>> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:14:20 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Butts Here are some more comments
    >>>>> published within CBC that the RCMP and their boss Ralph Goodale should
    >>>>> review ASAP N'esy Pas?
    >>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Hello,
    >>>>> I am out of the office until Tuesday, October 22nd without access to
    >>>>> this
    >>>>> email.
    >>>>> In my absence, you may contact Mike McNair
    >>>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
    mailto:michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>) or
    >>>>> Elder Marques
    >>>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
    mailto:elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
    >>>>> Warm regards,
    >>>>> Katie
    >>>>> ______
    >>>>> Bonjour,
    >>>>> Je suis absente du bureau jusqu'au mardi 22 octobre sans accès à mes
    >>>>> courriels.
    >>>>> Durant mon absence, veuillez communiquer avec Mike McNair
    >>>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
    mailto:michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>) ou
    >>>>> Elder Marques
    >>>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
    mailto:elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>).
    >>>>> Cordialement,
    >>>>> Katie
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: "Butts, Gerald"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
    >>>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
    >>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access
    >>>>> to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at
    >>>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss
    >>>>> limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez
    >>>>> communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse
    >>>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:30:48 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
    >>>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
    >>>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
    >>>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
    >>>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
    >>>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
    >>>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
    >>>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
    >>>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
    >>>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
    >>>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
    >>>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
    >>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you
    >>>>>
    >>>>> -------------------
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
    >>>>> Vancouver Granville.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
    >>>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
    >>>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
    >>>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
    >>>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
    >>>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
    >>>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
    >>>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
    >>>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
    >>>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
    >>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Merci
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
    >>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:15 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
    >>>>> Province of Nova Scotia
    >>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
    >>>>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
    >>>>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
    >>>>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
    >>>>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
    >>>>> message sera examin? avec attention.
    >>>>> Merci!
    >>>>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
    >>>>> S?curit? publique Canada
    >>>>> *********
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
    >>>>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
    >>>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
    >>>>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
    >>>>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
    >>>>> carefully reviewed.
    >>>>> Thank you!
    >>>>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
    >>>>> Public Safety Canada
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
    >>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:11 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
    >>>>> Province of Nova Scotia
    >>>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
    >>>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
    >>>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
    >>>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
    >>>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
    >>>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
    >>>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
    >>>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
    >>>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
    >>>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
    >>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you
    >>>>>
    >>>>> -------------------
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
    >>>>> Vancouver Granville.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
    >>>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
    >>>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
    >>>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
    >>>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
    >>>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
    >>>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
    >>>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
    >>>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
    >>>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
    >>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Merci
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
    >>>>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    >>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:17 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: RE: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
    >>>>> Scotia
    >>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    >>>>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    >>>>> comments.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    >>>>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    >>>>> commentaires.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    >>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:16 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
    >>>>> Province of Nova Scotia
    >>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
    >>>>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
    >>>>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
    >>>>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
    mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
    >>>>> press releases.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >>>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:53:03 -0400
    >>>>> Subject: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
    >>>>> To: wrscott@nbpower.com, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
    >>>>> "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
    >>>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
    >,
    >>>>> "rick.doucet"<rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Sollows, David (ERD/DER)"
    >>>>> <david.sollows@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
    >>>>> "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> "Bill.Fraser"<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "John.Ames"<John.Ames@gnb.ca>,
    >>>>> gerry.lowe@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
    >>>>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "art.odonnell"<art.odonnell@nb.aibn.com>,
    >>>>> "jake.stewart"<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, mike.holland@gnb.ca, votejohnw
    >>>>> <votejohnw@gmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> greg.thompson2@gnb.ca, jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
    >>>>> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, wharrison
    >>>>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
    >>>>> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
    >>>>> "clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
    >>>>> "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
    >>>>> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
    >, "Bill.Morneau"
    >>>>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
    >>>>> JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
    ,
    >>>>> Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca, Newsroom
    >>>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
    >>>>> <news@dailygleaner.com>
    >>>>> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
    , motomaniac333
    >>>>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca,
    >>>>> Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: "McGrath, Stephen T"<Stephen.McGrath@novascotia.ca
    >
    >>>>> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:40:22 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Does anyone recall the email entitled "So
    >>>>> Stephen McGrath if not you then just exactly who sent me this latest
    >>>>> email from your office?"
    >>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thanks for your message, however I am no longer at the Department of
    >>>>> Justice, and this email account is not being monitored.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Please contact Kim Fleming at Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca (phone
    >>>>> 902-424-4023), or Vicky Zinck at Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca (phone
    >>>>> 902-424-4390). Kim and Vicky will be able to redirect you.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
    >>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Mr. Amos,
    >>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
    >>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
    >>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
    >>>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
    >>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
    >>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
    >>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Department of Justice
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400
    >>>>> Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just
    >>>>> called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit
    >>>>> against Nova Scotia
    >>>>> To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
    , Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca,
    >>>>> Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
    >>>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/NSDeputies.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/LLLangley-bio.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Laura Lee Langley
    >>>>> 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor
    >>>>> One Government Place
    >>>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5
    >>>>> Phone: (902) 424-8940
    >>>>> Fax: (902) 424-0667
    >>>>> Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
    >>>>>
    >>>>> https://novascotia.ca/just/deputy.asp
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Karen Hudson Q.C.
    >>>>> 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor
    >>>>> Joseph Howe Building
    >>>>> Halifax, NS B3J 3J9
    >>>>> Phone: (902) 424-4223
    >>>>> Fax: (902) 424-0510
    >>>>> Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca
    >>>>>
    >>>>> https://novascotia.ca/sns/ceo.asp
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Joanne Munro:
    >>>>> 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South
    >>>>> Maritime Centre
    >>>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5
    >>>>> Phone: (902) 424-4089
    >>>>> Fax: (902) 424-5510
    >>>>> Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
    >>>>>
    >>>>> If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I
    >>>>> suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown
    >>>>> Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached
    >>>>> to you and your Premier etc.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Veritas Vincit
    >>>>> David Raymond Amos
    >>>>> 902 800 0369
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
    >>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
    >>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Good Day Sir
    >>>>>
    >>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
    >>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
    >>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
    >>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
    >>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
    >>>>> suggested that you study closely.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>>>>
    >>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>>>>
    >>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>>>>
    >>>>> April 3rd, 2017
    >>>>>
    >>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The only hearing thus far
    >>>>>
    >>>>> May 24th, 2017
    >>>>>
    >>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Date: 20151223
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
    >>>>>
    >>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
    >>>>>
    >>>>> BETWEEN:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Plaintiff
    >>>>>
    >>>>> and
    >>>>>
    >>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Defendant
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ORDER
    >>>>>
    >>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
    >>>>> December 14, 2015)
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
    >>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
    >>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
    >>>>> in its entirety.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
    >>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
    >>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
    >>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
    >>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
    >>>>> he stated:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
    >>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
    >>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
    >>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
    >>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
    >>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
    >>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
    >>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
    >>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
    >>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
    >>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
    >>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
    >>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
    >>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
    >>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
    >>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
    >>>>> Police.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
    >>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
    >>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
    >>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
    >>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
    >>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
    >>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
    >>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
    >>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
    >>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
    >>>>> is no order as to costs.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
    >>>>> Judge
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
    >>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
    >>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
    >>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
    >>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
    >>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
    >>>>> most
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    >>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    >>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    >>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> January 13, 2015
    >>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >>>>>
    >>>>> December 8, 2014
    >>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
    >>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    >>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Vertias Vincit
    >>>>> David Raymond Amos
    >>>>> 902 800 0369
    >>>>>
    >>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
    >>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
    >>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
    >>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Subject:
    >>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
    >>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
    >>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> January 30, 2007
    >>>>>
    >>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Mr. David Amos
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
    >>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
    >>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
    >>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Sincerely,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
    >>>>> Minister of Health
    >>>>>
    >>>>> CM/cb
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
    >>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
    >>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
    >>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
    >>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
    >>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
    >>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
    >>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
    >>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
    >>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
    >>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
    >>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
    >>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
    >>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
    >>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
    >>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
    >>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Sincerely,
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
    >>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
    >>>>> Traffic Services NCO
    >>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
    >>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
    >>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
    >>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
    >>>>> United States Senate
    >>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
    >>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
    >>>>> Washington, DC 20510
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
    >>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
    >>>>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
    >>>>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
    >>>>> contact
    >>>>> with you about this previously.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Very truly yours,
    >>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
    >>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
    >>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
    >>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
    >>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
    >>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
    >>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
    >>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
    >>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
    >>>>> Integrity Commissioner
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
    >>>>> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
    >>>>> Deschênes. They have two sons.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
    >>>>> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
    >>>>> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
    >>>>> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
    >>>>> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
    >>>>> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
    >>>>> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
    >>>>> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
    >>>>> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
    >>>>> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
    >>>>> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
    >>>>> Canada.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
    >>>>> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
    >>>>> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
    >>>>> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
    >>>>> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
    >>>>> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
    >>>>> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
    >>>>> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
    >>>>> Registration Act.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
    >>>>> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
    >>>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
    >>>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
    >>>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
    >>>>> to be..
    >>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>>>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
    >>>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
    >>>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
    >>>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
    >>>>> to be..
    >>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
    >>>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
    >>>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
    >>>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
    >>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
    >>>>> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
    >>>>> and a response will be forthcoming.
    >>>>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
    >>>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
    >>>>> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
    >>>>> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
    >>>>> Mallory Fowler
    >>>>> Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
    >>>>> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
    >>>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
    >>>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
    >>>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
    >>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>>>> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
    >>>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
    >>>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
    >>>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
    >>>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
    >>>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
    >>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Kveðja / Best regards
    >>>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> For the public record I knew Birgitta was no better than the people
    >>>>> she bitches about when she refused to discuss the QSLS blog with me
    >>>>> while she was in Canada making her rounds in the Canadain media in
    >>>>> January of 2011.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This is the docket
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>>>>
    >>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last two hearings
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it
    >>>>> again
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
    >>>>> Campaign, Rogers TV
    >>>>>
    >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Veritas Vincit
    >>>>> David Raymond Amos
    >>>>> 902 800 0369
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400
    >>>>> Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the
    >>>>> 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the
    >>>>> Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain
    >>>>> this lawsuit to you real slow.
    >>>>> To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
    >>>>> "daniel.mchardie"<daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca,
    >>>>> info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca,
    >>>>> matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca,
    >>>>> tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com
    >>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "Frank.McKenna"
    >>>>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca,
    >>>>> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
    ,
    >>>>> "dominic.leblanc.a1"<dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca
    >, oldmaison
    >>>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>,
    >>>>> "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay"
    >>>>> <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
    >>>>> most
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    >>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    >>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    >>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> January 13, 2015
    >>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >>>>>
    >>>>> December 8, 2014
    >>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
    >>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    >>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
    >>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
    >>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
    >>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
    >>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
    >>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
    >>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
    >>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
    >>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
    >>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
    >>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
    >>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
    >>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
    >>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
    >>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
    >>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
    >>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
    >>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
    >>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
    >>>>> campaign of 2006.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
    >>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
    >>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
    >>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
    >>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
    >>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
    >>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
    >>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
    >>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
    >>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
    >>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
    >>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
    >>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
    >>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
    >>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
    >>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
    >>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
    >>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
    >>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
    >>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
    >>>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
    >>>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
    >>>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
    >>>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
    >>>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
    >>>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
    >>>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
    >>>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
    >>>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
    >>>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
    >>>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
    >>>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
    >>>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
    >>>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
    >>>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
    >>>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
    >>>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
    >>>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
    >>>>> are not.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
    >>>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
    >>>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
    >>>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
    >>>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
    >>>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
    >>>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
    >>>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
    >>>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
    >>>>>
    >>>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
    >>>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
    >>>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
    >>>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
    >>>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
    >>>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
    >>>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
    >>>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
    >>>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
    >>>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
    >>>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
    >>>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
    >>>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
    >>>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
    >>>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
    >>>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
    >>>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
    >>>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
    >>>>>
    >>>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
    >>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
    >>>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
    >>>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
    >>>>> alive
    >>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
    >>>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
    >>>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    >>>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
    >>>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
    >>>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
    >>>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
    >>>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
    >>>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    , stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
    >>>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
    >>>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
    >>>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
    >>>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
    >>>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
    , Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
    >>>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
    >>>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
    >>>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
    >>>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
    >>>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
    >>>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
    >>>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
    >>>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
    >>>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
    >>>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
    >>>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
    >>>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
    >>>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
    >>>>> interesting though
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
    >>>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
    >>>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
    >>>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
    >>>>>
    >>>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
    >>>>> shy political animal
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Veritas Vincit
    >>>>> David Raymond Amos
    >>>>> 902 800 0369
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
    >>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
    >>>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
    >>>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
    >>>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
    >>>>> including a Canadian general.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
    >>>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
    >>>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
    >>>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
    >>>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
    >>>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
    >>>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
    >>>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
    >>>>> into the US policy.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
    >>>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
    >>>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
    >>>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
    >>>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
    >>>>> were deployed WMD.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
    >>>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
    >>>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
    >>>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
    >>>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
    >>>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
    >>>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
    >>>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
    >>>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
    >>>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
    >>>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
    >>>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >>>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
    >>>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
    >>>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
    >>>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
    >>>>>
    >>>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
    >>>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
    >>>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
    >>>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
    >>>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
    >>>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
    >>>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
    >>>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
    >>>>>
    >>>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
    >>>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>

    Labour board dismisses CUPE complaint after some workers ordered back to work

    $
    0
    0

     

     
     

    Labour board dismisses CUPE complaint after some workers ordered back to work

    Union representing health-care workers who were forced back to job alleges intimidation by government

    On Friday, Public Safety Minister Ted Flemming said cabinet was using the Emergency Measures Act to issue an order forcing more than 3,000 striking health-care workers to go back to their jobs.

    Over the weekend, the affected custodians, patient services workers and laundry workers went back to work while their union challenged the order with the New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board.

    According to board ruling filed Sunday, CUPE alleged the province was trying to "compel, by intimidation or threat," employees who are not designated essential to stop striking.

    In its response, the province first said the labour board lacked the jurisdiction to consider the mandatory order. The province also said the order is lawful and denied CUPE's allegations.

    The order does not note the reasons why the complaint was dismissed, except to say the chair was not satisfied that the province violated the Public Service Labour Relations Act.

    The full written reasons are typically completed weeks after the decision itself is made.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Hadeel Ibrahim is a CBC reporter based in Saint John. She can be reached at hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FO8399116C0&ab_channel=CUPENewBrunswick

     


    Un message sur l'arreté d'urgence de Higgs // Higgs' back to work emergency order

    116 views
    Nov 7, 2021
    244 subscribers

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywgHbmDcQvY&ab_channel=CUPENewBrunswick 

     


     

    Our Counter Offer // Notre contre-offre

    702 views
    Nov 7, 2021
    244 subscribers
    November 6, 2021 - CUPE NB President Stephen Drost outlines Premier Higgs' misleading statements about negotiations and explains CUPE's counter offer which the Premier has not responded to. // 6 novembre 2021 - Le président du SCFP NB, Stephen Drost, souligne les déclarations trompeuses du premier ministre Higgs au sujet des négociations et explique la contre-offre du SCFP à laquelle le premier ministre n'a pas répondu. 
     
    ***************** 
     
     Mettons les choses au clair. 
     
    L'équipe de négociation centralisée n'a jamais accepté l'offre que Higgs a présentée jeudi soir. 
     
    Aucun accord de principe n'a été conclu. Higgs ment. 
     
    Cette offre ne peut pas faire l'objet d'un vote. 
     
    Le SCFP a présenté une contre-offre à l'employeur tôt vendredi matin - nous n'avons pas encore reçu de réponse. 
     
    LA CONTRE-OFFRE DU SCFP COMPREND: 
     
    Des augmentations salariales de 2 % par an, plus 25 cents de l'heure supplémentaires par an et 50 cents de l'heure pour les années 4 et 5. Cela pourrait signifier un peu plus de 3% par an ou un peu moins de 4% par an, selon votre taux de salaire. POUR 
     
    LES EMPLOYÉS OCCASIONNELS 
     
    Nous sommes d'accord pour que les employés occasionnels soient payés à 100% du taux de salaire. C'est ce qu'ils ont toujours mérité. 
     
    RÉTROACTIVITÉ DE LA PAIE 
     
    Le salaire rétroactif n'est pas un bonus, c'est un paiement pour le travail déjà effectué. 
     
    La seule raison pour laquelle nos membres reçoivent un salaire rétroactif est que l'employeur n'a pas réussi à résoudre les contrats plus tôt. 
     
    PENSIONS 
     
    Higgs nous a dit que son offre salariale n'était valable pour les 10 sections locales a la condition que deux d'entre elles acceptaient d'importantes concessions sur les pensions. 
     
    Ce graphique indique que les plans sont en péril. La vérité est que le gouvernement doit de l'argent aux régimes de retraite du secteur de l'éducation. Le gouvernement a été sommé de payer. Et il ne veut pas le faire. 
     
    Les travailleurs n'ont jamais manqué un seul paiement dans les plans de pension. 
     
     Le gouvernement de Higgs attaque les travailleurs. 
     
    Higgs fait tout ce qui est en son pouvoir pour les priver de leurs droits légaux tels que prescrits par la Loi sur les relations de travail dans la fonction publique. 
     
    Higgs a été élu pour servir et protéger tous les citoyens, et non pour écraser les travailleurs. 
     
    Higgs doit faire ce pour quoi il à avez été élu, c’est à dire traiter tous les citoyens avec respect et dignité.
     
    David Amos
    I called AGAIN

     

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/cupe-strike-stalemate-1.6240533 

     

    CUPE, province at an impasse as strike reaches Day 10

    Unionized workers picket across province as students prepare for Week 2 of at-home learning

    The Canadian Union of Public Employees and the New Brunswick government are at an impasse as the strike moves into its 10th day.

    Premier Blaine Higgs said Saturday that he was shocked the union didn't accept an offer his government presented last week.

    Steve Drost, CUPE New Brunswick president, said Sunday the union sent the province a counter-offer on Friday, but has yet to receive a response. 

    Drost said there are no plans for the two sides to meet. 

    On Friday, the province ordered striking health-care workers back to work.

    Those mandated back include more than 2,000 workers in locals 1252, 1190 and 1251, which represent support staff in vaccination clinics and hospitals, and those providing laundry services to hospitals and nursing homes. 

    The order only applies to striking workers in the health sector. School staff, jail guards, court stenographers and others on strike are not affected and are continuing strike action. 

    The union's lawyers are looking into how they could challenge the order, Drost said Saturday. 

    The most recent offer from the union seeks a wage increase of two per cent per year, plus an additional 25 cents per hour per year for the first three years, and 50 cents per hour for the fourth and fifth years.

    The province's most recent offer includes the same two per cent increase each year, plus an increase of 25 cents per hour in each of the five years. There is also a demand that some locals concede to pension changes. 

    The province wants the union to shift two locals into the province's shared-risk pension plan. 

    Both the province and the union agree that casuals should have wages increased to 100 per cent of the applicable regular rate of pay, up from the current 80 per cent.

    Because of the labour dispute, all schools across the province will continue with at-home learning Monday for the second week in a row. 

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/striking-health-care-workers-ordered-back-to-work-1.6239947 

     

    Striking health-care workers back to work in N.B. after province invokes emergency order

    Over 2,000 workers are complying with the province's order to return to work

    Health-care workers returning to work after premier's order, CUPE N.B. president says

    7:26
    Striking health-care workers in New Brunswick are being forced to return to work on Saturday. Premier Blaine Higgs has used emergency COVID-19 legislation to issue the order. Stephen Drost, president of CUPE N.B., says while he is disappointed, health-care workers are honouring the order and returning to work. 7:26

    Striking health-care workers in New Brunswick, members of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, are complying with the province's back-to-work order, union leaders say.

    The order announced by the justice minister on Friday impacts health-care workers in locals 1252, 1190 and 1251, which represent support staff in vaccination clinics and hospitals, and those providing laundry services to hospitals and nursing homes.

    "They decided that they were going back to work this morning because it was an order," said Norma Robinson, the president of Local 1252. 

    Robinson's local represents support staff and maintenance workers in hospitals, including over 2,000 who have been ordered back to work.

    The local has about 9,000 members in all, including 70 per cent who have already been working throughout the strike since they were deemed essential by the province.

    Over 200 laundry workers are also impacted by the order, in addition to 48 workers in the supply chain that supports hospitals. 

    "I just want to express how frustrated and angry our members are with the application of the Emergency Measures Act," said Chris Curran, the president of the local representing laundry workers.

    "Members feel like they've been cheated of their right to strike."

    Thousands of striking and locked-out public-sector workers and supporters gathered at the legislature in Fredericton on Tuesday. (Miriam Lafontaine/CBC)

    Hospitals never reached out to his local to say the services at the hospitals were reaching emergency levels, Curran said, and workers would have been willing to step in if it was needed.

    The order, which is separate from the existing COVID-19 mandatory order, only applies to striking workers in the health-care field. School staff, jail guards, court stenographers and others on strike are not affected and can continue strike action.

    Hefty fines for non-compliance 

    Health-care workers who fail to show up to work when scheduled could face fines ranging from $480 to $20,400 per day. Those encouraging workers to strike could also face fines. 

    "In addition, CUPE will be fined a minimum of $100,000 for each day that a worker does not comply with the mandatory order," the province wrote in a statement issued Friday. 

    Under the order, hospitals can assign non-bargaining employees or contract the work elsewhere to ensure the continuation of services if necessary, the statement added.

    N.B. Public Safety Minister and Attorney General Ted Flemming announced Friday that his government was using the Emergency Measures Act to force striking health-care workers back to work at midnight Friday. (Joe McDonald/CBC)

    At a press conference Friday afternoon, the CEOs of the province's two health authorities said they asked for the order out of concern for patients, including many who have had urgent surgeries cancelled. 

    By early afternoon on Saturday, both health authorities sent out press releases welcoming the workers back. The Vitalité Health Network said the situation at hospitals is already improving — and over the coming days they'll work to increase hospital capacity for surgeries.

    The province says it has not heard any reports from either health networks regarding employees not showing up to their shifts, according to a release shared Saturday.

    Robinson said some of her members have been turned away from their hospital shifts by management despite being scheduled, including many in the Campbellton region.

    "They were informed this morning they were not included in this mandatory order," she said.

    The CBC has since reached out to Vitalité for comment. 

    CUPE considers legal options

    CUPE president Steve Drost said even though health-care workers are complying with the order, the union's lawyers are looking into how they could challenge it.

    There are already laws in place to ensure essential workers stay on the job during strike action, he emphasized, saying the mandatory order is outrageous.

    "It's simply a tool that was used to interfere with these members' legal rights," Drost said in an afternoon press conference on Saturday. 

    Steve Drost, president of CUPE New Brunswick, spoke at an afternoon press conference on Saturday. (CBC)

    The union has also been scrambling to figure out who the order applies to among their members. 

    "The unions have been complying with this order, but there certainly are a lot of questions about who it applies to and who it doesn't apply to," Drost added in an interview.

    The province has yet to respond to the union's counter-offer that was shared following talks on Friday, the union said.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Miriam Lafontaine is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick based in Fredericton. She's originally from Montreal, and can be reached at miriam.lafontaine@cbc.ca.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

    CUPE takes province to court over back-to-work emergency order

    $
    0
    0

     

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/new-brusnwick-strike-cupe-back-to-work-order-1.6242264 

     

    CUPE takes province to court over back-to-work emergency order

    CUPE alleges the mandatory order forcing staff back to work is unconstitutional

    In a filing for a judicial review Monday, CUPE alleges the emergency order is unconstitutional. CUPE is asking a judge to quash the emergency order, which they allege contravenes the workers' right to freedom of association or to belong to a certain organization.

    Last week, Public Safety Minister Ted Flemming said cabinet was using the Emergency Measures Act to issue an order forcing the health-care workers to go back to their jobs. The order says if a person fails to comply with it, the "employee organization" they're a member of would be fined a minimum of $100,000, with no maximum limit, for each day they don't comply.

    CUPE application says the fines exceed what's allowed through the Emergency Measures Act, and constitutes "cruel and unusual punishment", which also contravenes the charter. 

    Health authority CEOs said order was necessary

    The CEOs of the two health authorities said the system had reached a breaking point with not enough custodians and workers to keep the trash cans empty and the bed sheets clean.

    Several COVID-19 testing and vaccination centres were also closed because of lack of staff, according to the province.

    One local has about 70 per cent of its workers designated essential and therefore not on strike, but the province and health authorities said that number was still not enough to keep the system functioning and people safe.

    Over the weekend, the affected custodians, patient services workers and laundry workers were back on the job while their union challenged the order with the New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board.

    The board dismissed the complaint, saying there wasn't enough evidence to prove the province broke the law by forcing workers off the picket lines.

    The next day, CUPE filed the lawsuit.

    The province has not filed a statement of defence and no date has been set to hear the case. 

    'We will defend it fully in court'

    Premier Blaine Higgs said Monday the province is prepared to spend as much money as it needs to in order to "keep the health and safety of our citizens first and foremost."

    "It's just unfortunate that it would continue to challenge us in court when we have an emergency measures act in place, when we have a pandemic on the fourth wave and we have situations in our hospitals that need to be addressed," he said in a news conference Monday. "We were cancelling, you know, elective surgeries and starting to get to a point where we could go beyond that.

    "It's kind of hard to imagine that the CUPE leadership would take a position that they are, but I assure you, we will defend it fully in the courts."

    The remaining locals not involved in the back-to-work order remain on strike, including certain school staff and transportation workers.


    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/higgs-cupe-health-care-workers-1.6243082 

     

    Higgs says CUPE health-care workers could continue strike with Public Health go-ahead

    Higgs says workers could go back on strike if they wish once Sept. 24 state of emergency ends

    Higgs made the comments to reporters after the Opposition Liberals questioned whether he plans to keep the emergency order in place in perpetuity, even after COVID-19 hospitalizations fall below the threshold for lifting restrictions.

    "If the CEOs [of the two regional health authorities] and Public Health were to say, 'Okay, we're good to go,' then we'd be in a situation where we could say, 'Okay, we don't need to maintain this regulation about back to work," he told reporters.

    "Workers could go back on strike if they chose to do so. I would like to think that during this time frame that they will have a chance to vote on the offer that's on the table, and all of this would be unnecessary."

    Use of emergency powers

    Last Friday the province used the same emergency powers to order striking hospital workers back on the job. Most of them are members of the 9,000-strong Canadian Union of Public Employees Local 1252. 

    The province declared a new COVID-19 state of emergency on Sept. 24 under the provincial Emergency Measures Act and issued a new mandatory order on masks and other measures.

    At the time they said that order would be lifted when fewer than 10 New Brunswickers were hospitalized for COVID-19. 

    Hospitalizations peaked at 68 on Oct. 13 and have been trending downward since then. On Tuesday there were 16.

    That trend prompted the Liberal Opposition to ask Tuesday what will happen to the order applying to health workers if that number dips below 10.

    "Premier, are you going to have a state of emergency forever, as long as you're premier?" Liberal Leader Roger Melanson asked during question period.

    Justice and Public Safety Minister Ted Flemming pointed out that the back-to-work order is separate from the COVID-19 restrictions order.

    But Higgs acknowledged to reporters that it is linked to the pandemic.

    "It is a separate document, but it is allowable because of the province being under an emergency order, so the two are tied in that sense, because it is health and safety." 

    At first he refused to answer questions about what will happen when hospitalizations dip below 10, calling them hypothetical.

    He then said he wouldn't necessarily keep the back-to-work order in place.

    "I'm not saying that would be the case at all. We would decide at that point at time based on the Public Health assessment and the CEOs' assessment about what would be the next step." 

    Thousands of striking and locked-out public sector workers and supporters gather at the Legislature in Fredericton on Nov. 2, days before striking health-care workers were ordered back to work. (Jacques Poitras/CBC News)

    He pointed out that it was the health authority CEOs who asked for the order last week based on hospitals reaching the breaking point.

    He said any decision to lift the order would be based on the same consideration, not the state of the labour dispute.

    Green Party Leader David Coon, who called the use of the emergency order "autocratic" last week, said he was not reassured by Higgs's comments. 

    "I guess I don't buy it. I don't see that happening. I think that's just politics." 

    Green Party Leader David Coon said on Twitter the Higgs government's use of the Emergency Measures Act powers to order public sector workers back to work is "unacceptable" and "circumvents the democratic process of the Legislature." (Ed Hunter/CBC)

    Current status on negotiations

    The order signed last Friday applies only to health-care workers. About 70 per cent of CUPE Local 1252 members had been designated essential and were still working despite the strike.

    School staff, jail guards, court stenographers and other CUPE members on strike were not affected by the order and continue to walk picket lines.

    Higgs continued to insist Tuesday that CUPE leaders put what he called a new offer to members for a vote, though union officials argue that's not possible unless they and the province reach a tentative agreement.

    The premier has claimed there was a deal last Thursday night that union leaders would take to workers. CUPE denies that, saying it responded to the government's proposal with a counter-proposal in the wee hours of Friday morning.

    The two sides were not far apart on wages but Higgs is insisting that two CUPE locals agree to look at a new pension system.

    The province has the power to declare a "final offer" and ask the New Brunswick Labour and Employment board to order union members to vote on the proposal. 

    "We are looking at that, because it is an option," Higgs said Tuesday.

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Jacques Poitras

    Provincial Affairs reporter

    Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/cupe-labour-board-complaint-1.6241039

     

    Labour board dismisses CUPE complaint after some workers ordered back to work

    Union representing health-care workers who were forced back to job alleges intimidation by government

    On Friday, Public Safety Minister Ted Flemming said cabinet was using the Emergency Measures Act to issue an order forcing more than 3,000 striking health-care workers to go back to their jobs.

    Over the weekend, the affected custodians, patient services workers and laundry workers went back to work while their union challenged the order with the New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board.

    According to board ruling filed Sunday, CUPE alleged the province was trying to "compel, by intimidation or threat," employees who are not designated essential to stop striking.

    In its response, the province first said the labour board lacked the jurisdiction to consider the mandatory order. The province also said the order is lawful and denied CUPE's allegations.

    The order does not note the reasons why the complaint was dismissed, except to say the chair was not satisfied that the province violated the Public Service Labour Relations Act.

    The full written reasons are typically completed weeks after the decision itself is made.

    On Saturday, CUPE president Steve Drost said the union's lawyers are looking into how they could challenge it.

    "It's simply a tool that was used to interfere with these members' legal rights," Drost said of the back-to-work order.

    Higgs ready to defend use of emergency act

    Asked how the province would respond if CUPE went to court over use of the emergency act, Premier Blaine Higgs said the province would continue to defend the "health and safety of our citizens."  

    "It's just unfortunate that CUPE would continue to challenge us in court when we have an Emergency Measures Act in place, when we have a pandemic [in] the fourth wave," Higgs told reporters Monday.

    "We have situations in our hospitals that need to be addressed and we were cancelling elective surgeries and starting to get to a point where we could go beyond that.

    He said he found CUPE's position hard to understand, but if the union continues to challenge the back-to-work order, "we will defend it fully in the courts."

    Offer, counteroffer, pension impasse

    On Thursday night, the province made CUPE officials an offer that's closer to what the union has been asking for when it comes to wage increases.

    The offer includes a two per cent increase over five years, plus a 25 cent increase per hour over the same number of years. 

    The province's offer also includes a memorandum of agreement, where to move forward, both sides would have to agree to allow pension representatives to find a "new retirement vehicle" for two locals. 

    Higgs said Monday that the government proposal of wage increases totalling 15 per cent over five years reflected the  good work of employees.

    "This offer reflects what people have done throughout the pandemic," said Higgs.

    The two locals, one representing school support staff such as bus drivers, and the other representing educational and clerical assistants, are the only ones remaining with no shared-risk pension plan.

    READ: The province's new emergency order forcing health-care workers back to work

    Mobile users: View the document
    (PDF 389 KBKB)
    (Text 389 KBKB)
    CBC is not responsible for 3rd party content

    The transition to shared-risk pension plans has been contentious. In 2016, CUPE joined a lawsuit against the "unilateral conversion" of the province's public service pension plan into a shared-risk plan.

    A shared-risk plan means an employee's retirement payout could increase or decrease depending on how their pension plan is performing.

    "The rights of CUPE members and many other public-sector workers were violated when the government unilaterally imposed pension changes on workers, in violation of their right to free collective bargaining," Daniel Légère, then-president of CUPE New Brunswick, said in 2016.

    Drost posted a video on Sunday explaining the counteroffer CUPE submitted in response. In it, he outlined wage increases that are almost identical to the ones the province was offering. However, the retirement-plan point in the province's offer would be "major concession" by the union.

    Back-to-work emergency order and impact on strike, health care

    The health-care workers were ordered back to work Friday after a full week of striking.

    In one group, Local 1252 representing support staff and maintenance workers in hospitals, 70 per cent were designated essential and were still working.

    However, the CEOs of the province's two health authorities said the system is close to a breaking point, and the remaining 30 per cent were needed urgently.

    Over the week of the strike, COVID-19 testing and contact-tracing capacity was significantly reduced, with multiple vaccination clinics cancelled.

    If workers don't report to work once ordered, the province could fine them between $480 and $20,400 for each day they don't comply, according to the new emergency order.

    On Monday, a few days after the emergency order was enacted, Higgs said he's been impressed with the returning employees' work ethic.

    "I've been so impressed with the people that have come back to work and have done so and integrated right back into the workforce as we thought or hoped they would, because they are our friends and neighbours."

    That doesn't mean they're content, according to the union. Chris Curran, the president of Local 1251 representing laundry workers, said earlier that members were frustrated and angry with the use of the emergency order.

    "Members feel like they've been cheated of their right to strike."

    ABOUT THE AUTHOR

    Hadeel Ibrahim is a CBC reporter based in Saint John. She can be reached at hadeel.ibrahim@cbc.ca

    With files from Vanessa Balintec

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    Premier Blaine Higgs chat with Blogger about debate with Striking C.U.P.E. at the Legislature!!!

    69 views
    Nov 9, 2021

    2.15K subscribers









    Union Power Political Action

    $
    0
    0

     

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWitsAgxd8U&ab_channel=CBC

     


    Retrobites: Jimmy Hoffa (1960) | CBC

    251,613 views
    Dec 11, 2008
     374K subscribers
    Infamous labour leader Jimmy Hoffa talks about power and his childhood.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eFPkqBLCdg&ab_channel=MyFootage.com

     


    1957 John F. Kennedy Questions Jimmy Hoffa

    149,748 views
    Jul 22, 2011
    66.1K subscribers
    Reel # 9125 This clip is available for licensing without time code and logo - To inquire about licensing email us at Myfootage@gmail.com or call us at (212) 620-3955 - Please Subscribe to our channel, as we are constantly adding new clips. Thanks! Then-Senator J.F.K. (with brother Robert Kennedy seated next to him) grills teamster leader Jimmy Hoffa during the Select Committee Labor hearings of 1957.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RsQu9KeP06s&ab_channel=MOBFAX 

     


    Robert F Kennedy, Jimmy Hoffa - McLellan Committee 1957

    15,894 views
    Jun 13, 2021
    22.7K subscribers
    Jimmy Hoffa is questioned on on Improper Activities In Labor Management. 1957 McClellan Committee. 
     
     In December 1952, Robert F. Kennedy was appointed assistant counsel for the Committee on Government Operations by the then-chairman of the committee, Senator Joseph McCarthy.Kennedy resigned in July 1953, but rejoined the committee staff as chief minority counsel in February 1954. 
     
     When the Democrats regained the majority in January 1955, Kennedy became the committee's chief counsel. 
     
    Soon thereafter, the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the U.S. Senate Committee on Government Operations, under the leadership of Democratic Senator John L. McClellan (chair of the committee and subcommittee), began holding hearings into labor racketeering. 
     
    Much of the Permanent Subcommittee's work focused on a scandal which emerged in 1956 in the powerful trade union, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. 
     
    In the mid-1950s, Midwestern Teamster leader Jimmy Hoffa began an effort to unseat Dave Beck, the union's international president. 
     
     In October 1955, mobster Johnny Dio met with Hoffa in New York City and the two men conspired to create as many as 15 paper locals (fake local unions which existed only on paper) to boost Hoffa's delegate totals. 
     
    When the paper locals applied for charters from the international union, Hoffa's political foes were outraged. A major battle broke out within the Teamsters over whether to charter the locals, and the media attention led to investigations by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.
     
     
    For educational purposes only.

     

     

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJ1JApQv4-U 
     
     

    Union Power Political Action

    195 views195 views
    Feb 24, 2015
    235 subscribers

    CUPE NB in action
     
     
    https://nbmediacoop.org/2021/11/04/cupe-1992-general-strike-video/
     
     

    CUPE 1992 General Strike [video]

     
    CUPE 1992 General Strike [video]

    In 1992, the New Brunswick government had tried to break signed contracts with several CUPE locals. Then Liberal Premier Frank McKenna thought he could push around workers to impose his austerity agenda. An eight-day province-wide illegal strike by CUPE members forced the Government of New Brunswick to back down and honour signed collective agreements.

    After much digging in our old VCR archives, the full CUPE 1992 general strike video is finally on Youtube. Watch it here. For more on the 1992 General Strike, read labour historian David Frank’s commentary here.

     
     
     

     
     
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R9VYxn6yf4 
     
     

    1418 Steve Drost

    151 views151 views
    Apr 26, 2015
    235 subscribers
    Created with Corel Pinnacle Studio
     
     
     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67hOtjHUgQ4&t=75s&ab_channel=CharlesLeblanc
     
     

    Steve Drost, CUPE New Brunswick President gives his views after Premier Blaine Higgs left conference

    100 views
    Nov 5, 2021
    2.15K subscribers
    Steve Drost, CUPE New Brunswick President gives his views after Premier Blaine Higgs left conference
    David Amos
    Hmmmmm
     
     
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iAWcrOxv10&ab_channel=CharlesLeblanc
     
     
     

    http://www.teamsters.ca/

    The Teamsters Union represents 125,000 members in Canada. They are affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, which has 1.4 million members in North America.

    For more information :
    Stéphane Lacroix
    Director of Communications and Public Affairs
    Teamsters Canada
    Cell: 514-609-5101
    slacroix@teamsters.ca

     

    https://www.facebook.com/Teamsters-Local-927-340945505997965

    Teamsters Local Union 927 has defended the interests of workers in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island for more than 60 years!


    (902) 445-5301
    Send Message

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDBbtBS-LP0&ab_channel=Teamsters 

     


    James R Hoffa Remembered

    29,304 views
    Feb 6, 2013
    10.1K subscribers
    Teamsters tribute to James R Hoffa on his 100th birthday

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7e1Bk21OcM&ab_channel=Teamsters 

     


    Full General President Candidates’ Debate Video

    3,681 views
    Sep 2, 2021
    10.1K subscribers

     

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8Si8YyiKdo&ab_channel=Teamsters

     


    Final Teamsters General President Candidates Debate 2021

    6,105 views
    Sep 15, 2021
    10.1K subscribers
    Watch the second and final General President Candidates debate, which took place on September 8. Hear directly from the candidates.

     

     https://teamsterslocal25.com/president-sean-m-obrien/

     

    Sean M. O’Brien
    President / Principal Officer, Teamsters Local 25
    Secretary Treasurer/Principal Executive Officer Teamsters Joint Council 10 New England
    Eastern Region Vice-President, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    Sean M. O’Brien is a fourth generation Teamster, initiated in 1991 working in the Rigging Industry. Since 1999, Sean has held nearly all positions for Teamsters Local 25. In 2006, Sean became the youngest President in Local 25’s long history. Teamsters Local 25 represents more than 12,000 members and their families in Greater Boston. In 2011, Sean was elected Eastern Region International Vice President of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Sean also serves as Secretary Treasurer/Principal Executive Officer of New England Teamsters Joint Council 10 representing 45,000 Teamsters in six New England States.

    International Brotherhood of Teamsters Eastern Region Vice President O’Brien, has worked tirelessly to increase the membership of the Teamsters Union both locally and nationally and has been successful in organizing various diverse industries. Sean serves as a Trustee on both the New England Teamsters Pension Plan and the Local 25 Health Insurance Plan where he has skillfully negotiated growth of both plans over the last seven years. Sean was appointed by the Governor of Massachusetts to the Board of Directors for the Massachusetts Port Authority in 2012.

    Sean M. O’Brien, serves on the Board of Directors for Autism Speaks and since 2007, Teamsters Local 25 has been the premier fundraiser for Autism Speaks raising millions of dollars. Local 25 has lobbied the Massachusetts Legislature on behalf of families affected by autism and worked to pass insurance reform that requires insurers to pay for autism-related expenses. Teamsters Local 25 hosts and supports an annual Toy Drive, donating truckloads of toys and providing financial support at Christmas for the less fortunate in the Greater Boston area.

    Teamsters Local 25
    544 Main Street
    Boston, MA 02129-1113

    Phone: 617-241-8825

    https://www.nlrb.gov/case/01-CB-010732 

     

    Case Number:   01-CB-010732
    Date Filed:   03/19/2007
    Status:  Closed
    Location:  Boston, MA
    Region Assigned:  Region 01, Boston, Massachusetts
    Reason Closed:  Informal Settlement

    Docket Activity


    Date sort ascendingDocumentIssued/Filed By
    03/26/2012 Compliance Case--Closing Letter* NLRB - GC
    08/11/2008 Notice to Employees* NLRB - GC
    07/30/2008 Informal Settlement Agreement* NLRB - GC

    The Docket Activity list does not reflect all actions in this case.

    * This document may require redactions before it can be viewed. To obtain a copy, please file a request through our FOIA Branch.

    Related Documents


    Related Documents data is not available.

    Allegations


    • 8(b)(1)(A) Hiring Halls
    • 8(b)(1)(B) Other Allegations
    • 8(b)(1)(A) Coercion, incl'g Statements and Violence
    • 8(b)(2) Union Security Related Actions

    Participants


    ParticipantAddressPhone
    Charged Party / Respondent
    Legal Representative
    FEINBERG, MICHAEL
    Feinberg, Dumont & Brennan
    177 Milk St., 3rd Floor
    Boston, MA
    02109-3408
    (617)338-1976
    Charged Party / Respondent
    Union
    INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 25
    544 Main Street
    Charlestown, MA
    02129-1109
    (617)241-8825
    Charged Party / Respondent
    Additional Service
    International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO
    4818 East Ben White Boulevard Suite 300
    Austin, TX
    78741
    (202)624-6847
    Charging Party
    Individual


    Charging Party
    Individual


    Charging Party
    Individual


    Charged Party / Respondent
    Union
    International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 25
    544 Main St
    Boston, MA
    02129-1109
    (617)241-8825

    Related Cases


     

     

    https://inthesetimes.com/article/hoffa-teamsters-for-a-democratic-union-reform-labor-militancy-election

     

    Hoffa’s House Divided: The 2021 Teamster Election, Explained

    A rank-and-file Teamster describes what’s at stake.

    Andy Sernatinger 


    An election this November will decide who will lead the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT), the North American union of 1.4 million members representing workers in nearly every sector, including logistics, package delivery, construction, film and television, manufacturing, and transportation. For more than 20 years, the union has been run by James P. Hoffa, son of the notorious Jimmy Hoffa, the historic Teamster president with connections to organized crime. This election marks the closing of a chapter in Teamster history: the end of the federal government’s oversight of the union, and the first election in 25 years without the younger Hoffa on the ballot. Whoever wins will direct the union as it wrestles with today’s difficult environment: the growth of Amazon, the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, the next United Parcel Service (UPS) contract, and increasingly hostile employers and politicians.

    Two slates are running for control of the IBT’s top offices: Teamster Power, led by Steve Vairma and running mate Ron Herrera, and Teamsters United, led by Sean O’Brien and running mate Fred Zuckerman. Five years ago, Teamsters United, then headed by Zuckerman, came only a few thousand votes shy of defeating Hoffa and winning the office of General President, 45.6% to 48.4%.

    Backed by the reform group Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU), Teamsters United built a campaign that drew on growing anger over a number of issues like concessionary contractsforced at UPS, inaction over a crisis in the union’s pension fund, and the decline of core industries (trucking and logistics). TDU, a grassroots organization of Teamster members formed in 1976, has a long history of campaigns to democratize the union, fight corruption, and organize for strong contracts. TDU’s campaigns resulted in the right to directly vote for top officials in 1989, as well as the election of Ron Carey as Teamster General President in 1991, and played a significant role in the successful 1997 UPS strike.

    In 2016, Zuckerman narrowly lost to Hoffa, but Teamsters United won seats on the union’s General Executive Board for the Central and Southern districts, while Hoffa was able to swing the Eastern and Western regions as well as Teamsters Canada. The election revealed the deep dissatisfaction of Teamster members, the distance between the ranks and the leadership, and the existence of a base of members who could potentially change the course of the union. 

    The 2021 election has been billed as a rematch five years in the making. Vairma, a relatively unknown principal officer out of Teamsters Local 455 in Colorado and member of the Hoffa-Ken Hall slate (the establishment caucus that won in 2016) since 2011, is considered Hoffa’s successor. Hoffa has endorsed Vairma’s Teamster Power, and the slate features many loyalists. If that was all there was to it, this election could be viewed as another round of the reformers vs. the Hoffa old guard.” Without Hoffa’s name and incumbency to tie the sitting administration’s coalition together, the challengers should have the advantage after coming so close to victory in the last election. It would be Teamsters United’s election to lose.

    But this time around, Teamsters United has taken a turn with the introduction of new leadership. In 2016, Teamsters United was fronted by Zuckerman, principal officer of Teamsters Local 89 in Louisville, Ky. — home of the UPS headquarters hub. Zuckerman is a quiet and straightforward union officer who found himself allied with TDU in opposition to Hoffa’s direction of UPS negotiations. Despite Zuckerman’s success at the top of the ticket five years ago, Teamsters United is now being led by O’Brien of Teamsters Local 25 in Boston.

    O’Brien, like Vairma, was until recently a member of the Hoffa-Hall slate, elected to the IBT’s General Executive Board in 2011 as an International Vice President for the Teamsters Eastern Region. At the end of 2017, Hoffa fired O’Brien as the chief negotiator for the union with UPS, ostensibly for taking too hard a position against the company. O’Brien broke ranks with Hoffa and reached across the aisle to Teamsters United. Zuckerman, already reluctant to lead the ticket in 2016, then handed Teamsters United over to O’Brien and slid down to the number two position. TDU endorsed O’Brien and Teamsters United at its 2019 Convention and began its campaign for the slate.

    In defecting from the Hoffa camp, O’Brien brings connections to other local officers and votes in the Eastern Region — but he isn’t without baggage. O’Brien has earned a reputation among officers and the ranks as an ambitious, hotheaded figure, with several charges filed against him in the union. In 2013, O’Brien threatened members of Providence-based Teamsters Local 251 for running an election campaign to challenge the local’s leadership. The incident was captured on video, and led to his suspension. Charges were again filed against him for threats to opponents at Teamster conventions but were ultimately dismissed.

    In 2014, O’Brien’s Local 25 made national news when the union’s picket for the TV show Top Chef was recorded making a series of racist and sexist slurs towards members of the filming crew. Five men involved with the picket were then brought up on criminal extortion charges for threats to the production. (Local 25 officer Mark Harrington pleaded guilty; the remaining four were eventually acquitted. O’Brien denied wrongdoing, calling the accusationsfiction at best”.)

    The underdog character of Teamsters United has changed with the new leadership. O’Brien’s connections through the IBT have brought so many local officers into the fold that Teamsters United led the delegate race going into this summer’s 2021 convention. Zuckerman had to fight to get onto the ballot in 2016, just clearing the minimum requirement by getting 8% of delegates to support his nomination. This year, O’Brien got on the ballot with 52% of delegates supporting him.

    This half of local Teamster functionaries who supported O’Brien’s nomination have not suddenly been won to the 2016 Teamsters United platform for democracy and militancy. Delegates who supported O’Brien agreed to reform the most egregious issues that have driven rank-and-file anger, like delays on strike pay and the dreaded Two-Thirds Rule, a policy that requires a supermajority of no” votes to reject a contract if fewer than 50% of members participate in ratification, which allowed Hoffa to impose the 2018 UPS contract despite a majority no” vote. But their commitment ended there. 

    Proposals that confronted the privileges of Teamster officials were all defeated. These sought to (1) limit the number of salaries union officials could collect; (2) require top officers to have experience as working Teamsters; (3) preserve the rule that candidates for president only need the support of 5% of delegates to qualify; and (4) bar any officials who have been suspended from the office of General President. As if to bold the point, Teamster delegates at the convention voted overwhelmingly to enshrine Hoffa Jr. as General President Emeritus for Life.” My own Local 695 leadership endorsed O’Brien and his slate, while at the same time getting a fresh order of TDU Sucks” pins for the hall.

    There’s no reform slate in this election,” says Tom Leedham, the three-time candidate for Teamster General President from 1997 to 2006. Leedham, who maintains that he is proud of his record with TDU, explained at a debrief of a recent debate, People say this is the reform slate with TDU. There’s essentially five candidates [on the Teamsters United slate] that proudly carry a TDU moniker. Two of them will be in non-voting positions. It is so difficult to make anything happen when you have three seats on a 25-person board.” 

    Rather than a referendum on reform, this election reveals a split in the old leadership of the union. Two candidates from the Hoffa administration are competing for the top office, pulling together different sections of the membership to try and carry them over the finish line. O’Brien has focused on the union members who fall under national contracts at UPS, UPS Freight (now TForce), and Yellow Roadway Corporation (YRC) Freight, drawing on the prestige of the 2016 Teamsters United campaign while also bringing along local leaders previously aligned with Hoffa. It makes sense: 70% of UPS Teamsters voted for Zuckerman last time.

    Vairma and Teamsters Power have focused their message on the need to have a racially diverse leadership to match the changing demographics in the union, bringing with them the backing of the Teamsters National Black Caucus. Vairma is following Hoffa’s winning election strategy of drawing on the majority of Teamsters under local white paper” agreements (standalone contracts specific to local unions), using the connections of allied local officers to turn out votes. United Parcel Service is extremely important in this union, we have 325,000 members,” said Vairma in the first Teamsters 2021 Presidential Debate, but we also have another million members in the white paper’ industry that want to know that their voices are going to be heard in this administration.” Vairma plainly rejected members’ concerns over bargaining at UPS: The Vote No’ campaign down at UPS was a farce.” Many members of Vairma’s slate are directors of the union’s various divisions: warehouse, port, rail, public service, healthcare, construction trades. Vairma has doubled down on this approach by criticizing the union’s preoccupation with UPS.

    O’Brien’s campaign has capitalized on his aggressive approach. It’s clear that I’m ambitious and I want to run this union to the fullest extent,” said O’Brien in the same debate. When you’re out there and you’re being aggressive, you’re taking calculated risks for the betterment of your members, of course there’s going to be controversy.” O’Brien is calling for defense of contracts, organizing core industries that have been neglected, and using the strike weapon. Vairma has leaned heavily into attacks on O’Brien’s record, painting himself as the safe bet. (Though Vairma has some skeletons in the closet as well: In 2017, the federal government’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) found his Local 455 guilty of discrimination against a group of Somali workers they represented.)

    How this will play out is difficult to predict. The Teamsters are rare among North American unions in that elections for top union office are held by direct member vote. (Most international unions determine their leadership by delegate convention.) Participation in Teamster elections has been declining since the direct vote was won in 1989 with the Federal government’s consent decree”; in 2016, an abysmally low 200,000 of 1.4 million members cast ballots — roughly 15%. Anger over the 2013 UPS contract made for a perfect storm in 2016, with a clear choice between the officialdom and the alternative. In 2021, the merger of a section of the Hoffa leadership with the reformers from TDU blurs the lines. 

    The slates differ largely in who they think will elect them, and then how they intend to confront employers (or not). Teamsters United, with materials almost exclusively for UPS workers, advertises that it’s ready to fight. Teamster Power, stitching together the union’s various sector conferences, appeals to candidates’ good character and asks for faith in their integrity while they stay the course. Mark Solomon, writer with FreightWaves magazine, stated it plainly in a question submitted to the Teamster Presidential debate: You represent the status quo and are considered less militant than Sean O’Brien and Fred Zuckerman.” Rank-and-file Teamsters will have to make the best of the situation, which starts with knowing who the candidates are and what they represent.

    It’s the activity of union members on the shop floor that has pushed the IBT to adopt any changes. The reforms that were passed this year were the product of rank-and-file organizing over the past decade: the Vote No” campaigns at UPS and YRC, the refusal of Teamster retirees to accept that their pensions could be lost, and the repeated challenges to local officers. With two disastrous debates for Vairma, O’Brien seems to have the lead. Regardless of who wins the election, members will need to be organized to keep the leadership accountable.

    Andy Sernatinger is a member of Teamsters Local 695 in Madison, Wisconsin.

     

    https://teamster.org/leadership/james-hoffa/ 

     

    James P. Hoffa

    James P Hoffa-2012.jpg

    General President

    James P. Hoffa has been building the International Brotherhood of Teamsters into the strongest, most powerful voice in North America for working families. Under Hoffa’s leadership, the Teamsters Union is winning industry-leading contracts, engaging in vigorous contract enforcement and organizing the unorganized. Teamster positions on the issues of the day—from pension and retirement security, infrastructure development and worker rights to developing fair trade policies—now hold sway in Washington’s power corridors.

    Hoffa is recognized as one of the foremost authorities on Union issues. As the most visible and outspoken critic of government trade policies and anti-worker corporate agendas, Hoffa is recognized as a leader on issues that affect working people.

    Hoffa has been elected by direct-members vote five times – 1998, 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2016. He is the second-longest serving General President (Dan Tobin, 1907 – 1952) since the union was founded in 1903.
    Hoffa grew up on picket lines and in union meetings. He is the only son of James R. Hoffa, former Teamsters General President (1957 – 1971). Prior to being elected General President, Hoffa worked as a Teamsters laborer in Detroit and Alaska in the 1960s. He then spent 25 years as a labor attorney representing members, local unions and Joint Councils. From 1993 until his inauguration as General President in 1999, Hoffa served as Administrative Assistant to the President of Joint Council 43 in Michigan.
    Hoffa has been appointed to several committees by both Democratic and Republican administrations. His appointments include:

    • 2019 – Present, Chair, Road Section, International Transport Workers Federation
    • 2019 – Present, Member, Executive Board, International Transport Workers Federation
    • 2015 – Present, Board Member, Roosevelt Institute
    • 2010 – Present, USTR Advisory Committee on Trade Policy and Negotiations
    • 2009 – Present, Department of Labor Advisory Committee for Trade Negotiations and Trade Policy
    • 2013 – 2015, National Freight Advisory Committee
    • 2002 – 2004, President’s Council on the 21st Century Workforce
    • 2002 – 2004, Secretary of Energy’s Advisory Board

    EDUCATION

    • BA, Michigan State University, 1963
    • LLB, University of Michigan, 1966

    Hoffa has been married to his wife Virginia for 50 years, he has two sons, David and Geoffrey, and six grandchildren.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-jo1tztVlM&ab_channel=Teamsters 

     


    Episode 212: Flexing Political Muscle in the Corridors of Power

    113 views
    May 26, 2021
    10.1K subscribers
    Listen to the latest edition of the Teamsters Podcast and hear how the union is flexing its muscles in D.C.’s Corridors of Power to make sure workers can join together and organize for better wages and safer workplaces. Plus, a leader Teamster official tells a Senate subcommittee about the future of freight. Featuring audio and interviews with Sunshine McBride, deputy director of the Teamsters’ Department of Political and Legislative Action, as well as Lamont Byrd, director of the Teamsters’ Safety & Health Department.

     

    Hoffa: Passage of Infrastructure Bill Will Create Millions of Good-Paying Jobs

    team6.jpg

    Improved Roads, Rails, Airports, Power Grid, Water Systems Will Benefit All Americans

    Press Contact: Ted Gotsch Phone: (703) 899-0869 Email: tgotsch@teamster.org

    (WASHINGTON) – The following is a statement from Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa on the House’s passage of a $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill yesterday that would invest and rebuild in essential networks that will grow jobs.

    “After years of inaction, Democrats and Republicans came together to approve important legislation that will boost necessary transportation, electrical and water networks that will create good-paying jobs and bring the nation’s economy into the 21st century. I want to thank the Biden administration and congressional leaders for all their hard work to get this done.

    “Previously, elected officials have only talked about infrastructure investment but done little about it. But now the traveling public as well as those do the work to keep the nation’s roads, rails and bridges up-and-running have reason for hope.

    “This bill will modernize essential transportation systems – all critical parts of America’s supply chain. Teamsters work each day in every part of this supply chain and know firsthand that our transportation infrastructure has been neglected for too long.”

    Founded in 1903, the International Brotherhood of Teamsters represents 1.4 million hardworking men and women throughout the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. Visit www.teamster.org for more information. Follow us on Twitter @Teamsters and “like” us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/teamsters.

     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4OzXgKXOLE&ab_channel=NashvilleBarAssociation 

     


    HOFFA! Part 1

    16,209 views
    Sep 22, 2017
    290 subscribers
     

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aBW3gYlRuh8&ab_channel=NashvilleBarAssociation 

     


    HOFFA! Part 2

    3,080 views
    Sep 22, 2017
    290 subscribers
    HOFFA! 
     
    An in-depth study of the 1962 “Test Fleet” trial and its lasting impact upon Nashville lawyers 
     
    An on-stage presentation recorded live at the Nashville Public Main Library, September 17, 2015 
     
     In October 1962, the nation’s most powerful labor leader, Teamsters President James R. Hoffa, went on trial in a Nashville federal courtroom. 
     
    The People vs. Jimmy Hoffa. The labor leader’s Nashville trial became a hornet’s nest of jury rigging, attempted assassination, and tragedy. 
     
    The Nashville Bar Association is your source for cutting-edge, quality continuing legal education. 
     
    Discover more at NashvilleBar.org/CLE.

     

     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8m-Djr8l5k&ab_channel=SceneMaker

     


    Jimmy HATES the Kennedy family| The Irishman

    56,582 views
    Dec 7, 2019
    63410ShareSave
    A mob hitman recalls his possible involvement with the slaying of Jimmy Hoffa. Director: Martin Scorsese Writers: Charles Brandt (book), Steven Zaillian (screenplay) Produced by Martin Scorsese

     

     

     

     

    Congressional Record: July 11, 2001 (Senate) Page S7437-S7440 

    NOMINATION OF ROBERT MUELLER 

     Mr. SPECTER. Mr. President, I have sought recognition this morning to comment about the confirmation hearings which are scheduled later this month for Mr. Robert Mueller to be Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. That position arguably is as important as any position in the United States of America, perhaps even the most powerful position. 

    The statutory 10-year term is 2 years longer than the maximum a President may serve under the Constitution. The Director of the FBI has power over the largest investigative organization in the world, global in its exposure. 

    There are an enormous number of problems which have befallen the agency in recent years. The confirmation hearing will provide a unique opportunity for oversight for the U.S. Senate to seek to establish standards as to what the FBI should be doing in cooperating with congressional oversight. 

     The FBI is a well-respected organization. I have had very extensive opportunities to work with the FBI. After graduation from college, I was in the Air Force Office of Special Investigations for 2 years and had training from the FBI. The commanding officer of the OSI was a former top aide to Director J. Edgar Hoover. 

    I worked with the [[Page S7438]] FBI on the prosecution of the Philadelphia Teamsters, an investigation which was conducted by the McClellan committee, with then-general counsel, Robert Kennedy, and saw their very fine work. Then, as Assistant Counsel to the Warren Commission, I worked with the FBI; then as district attorney of Philadelphia and for the last 20 years extensively on the Judiciary Committee. 

    I have great respect for the Federal Bureau of Investigation. At the same time, my experience has shown me that there is an over concern by the personnel of the FBI with their so-called institutional image and that there cannot be a concession of any problems, which is really indispensable if problems are to be corrected. 

    (Disturbance in the visitors' galleries.) 

    The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. Will the Sergeant at Arms restore order in the galleries. 

    Mr. SPECTER. We have a nominee who has been put forward by the President who has very impressive credentials: United States Attorney in Boston, United States Attorney in San Francisco, 3 years as Assistant Attorney General in the Justice Department, where I had contacts and saw his impressive work. 

    He will be succeeding a man, Director Louis Freeh, who came to the Bureau with extraordinary credentials and overall did a good job, although he presided over the Bureau at a time when there were many institutional failures. 

    I analogize Director Freeh to the little boy on the Netherlands dike running around putting his finger in all the holes to try to stop the water from coming through. With so many holes and so many problems, it was not possible. 

     I believe similarly that the Congress, including the Senate and the Senate Judiciary Committee, has not been sufficiently active on oversight. These hearings will give us an opportunity to set standards as to what the FBI should be doing in response to oversight activities by the Senate Judiciary Committee. 

     I had an opportunity to talk for the better part of an hour yesterday to FBI Director-designee Mueller and went over quite a number of issues that I intend to ask him in the public forum. I comment about these today because the Senate ought to be preparing for this hearing with unique care for this very important position. 

    One of the matters I intend to discuss with Mr. Mueller in the confirmation hearings is the failure of the FBI to turn over for congressional Senate oversight a memorandum dated December 9, 1996, which was written at a time when there was a question as to whether Attorney General Reno was going to be reappointed by President Clinton. At that time, the campaign finance investigation was just being started. There was a conversation by a top FBI official Esposito, with a top Department of Justice official Lee Radek, and FBI Director Freeh wrote this memorandum to the file to Mr. Esposito actually. Referring to a meeting that he had with the Attorney General on December 6, Director Freeh wrote this memo December 9: 

    I also advised the Attorney General of Lee Radek's comment to you that there was a lot of ``pressure'' on him and the Public Integrity Section regarding this case because the ``Attorney General's job might hang in the balance'' (or words to that effect). This memorandum did not come to the attention of the Judiciary Committee until April of 2000, some 3\1/2\ years later, when, in my capacity as chairman of the subcommittee on Department of Justice oversight, a subpoena was issued for all of the FBI records and writings relating to the campaign finance investigation. When this memo was discovered, Director Freeh was questioned as to why he hadn't turned it over for Judiciary Committee oversight, because it was the view of many that it absolutely should have been done. 

    Director Freeh defended his inaction on the ground that it would have compromised his relationship with Attorney General Reno. But notwithstanding that fact, it is my view that this is the sort of oversight the Judiciary Committee must undertake. This will be the subject of my questioning of Mr. Mueller during the confirmation hearing. 

    Director Freeh declined to appear voluntarily before the Judiciary Committee or the subcommittee to comment about this memorandum, and the committee decided not to issue a subpoena, which I thought should have been done. 

     It is my view that when a matter of this importance comes to light there ought to be a public inquiry as to what happened between the Attorney General and the Director of the FBI. It takes a congressional committee to get to the bottom of that. When Attorney General Reno testified, she said, ``I don't recall that, but if that had come to my attention, I certainly would have done something about it.''  In my view, anybody who is going to be confirmed for FBI Director has to have a commitment to making this sort of information available to Senate oversight. 

    Another matter which I intend to question Mr. Mueller about is the insistence of the FBI on not cooperating with Senate oversight where there is a pending criminal investigation. Now, I understand the sensitivity of a pending criminal investigation, having some experience as a prosecutor myself, but the case law is plain that congressional oversight is so fundamental and so important that it may proceed even as to pending criminal investigations. But that has not been honored by the Department of Justice or by the FBI. And in the case involving Dr. Wen Ho Lee, the subcommittee on the Department of Justice oversight was stymied at every turn by the FBI refusing to make available information, citing a pending criminal investigation. 

    Now, the chairman of the committee and the ranking member, or chairman and the ranking member of the subcommittee, have standing, it seems to me, on a discrete inquiry, carefully controlled, where the prosecution would not be compromised. That is the role of oversight. But when Wen Ho Lee was indicted on December 11, 1999, immediately, the FBI used that as a reason to resist any further Senate oversight. And there was a real question of why the FBI and the Department of Justice allowed Dr. Lee to remain at large after a search of his premises in April of 1999 was conducted, and then he was at liberty, at large, until December when an arrest warrant was issued. Suddenly, he became more problematic than public enemy No. 1, when he was put in manacles and solitary confinement, in a situation which had all the earmarks of an effort at the top of the Justice Department and FBI to coerce a guilty plea. 

    After the guilty plea was entered, Judiciary Committee oversight had been further stymied by the refusal of the FBI to allow access to what was going on because Dr. Lee was still being debriefed. Here again, I believe the Judiciary Committee is entitled to a commitment that oversight will be respected, and the case law will be respected, and that there may be oversight even on pending criminal investigations. 

    In the case of Hanssen, who has just entered a guilty plea on an arrangement to be spared the death penalty, raises some very fundamental questions that need to be answered as to procedures in the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Although this matter did not come to light until very recently, in August of 1986, Hanssen's voice was recorded by an FBI wiretap on his Soviet contact's telephone. In 1992, Hanssen improperly accessed his supervisor's computer. In 1997, Hanssen began to search the FBI computerized case database for his name, his home address, and for terms referring to espionage activities. 

     A question arises, what steps have been taken by the FBI to detect a spy such as Hanssen? There was a very probing report issued by the inspector general of the CIA after Aldrich Ames was detected as a spy, and the inspector general of the CIA, Fred Hitz, wrote this in the report: 

    We have no reason to believe that the directors of Central Intelligence who served during the relevant period were aware of the deficiencies described in this report. 

    That relates to Aldrich Ames. 

     But directors of Central Intelligence are obligated to ensure that they are knowledgeable of significant developments relating to crucial agency missions. Sensitive human source reporting on the Soviet Union and Russia during and after the Cold War clearly was such a mission, and certain directors of Central Intelligence must therefore be held accountable for serious shortcomings in that reporting. 

    [[Page S7439]] 

    Now, what that does essentially is to say that the Directors are at fault, even though they didn't know about Aldrich Ames, or have reason to know about Aldrich Ames, because the presence of spies in the Central Intelligence Agency so threatens national security that the Directors have an obligation to find out about it. 

    If you make it an absolute responsibility, that, according to the CIA inspector general, would put the pressure on the Directors to find out about it. The three Directors of the Central Intelligence Agency who were in office during the time Aldrich Ames functioned--Judge Webster, Gates, and Woolsey--responded with a very hot letter denying responsibility and saying that the standard set by the CIA inspector general was too high. Well, this is a subject I have discussed preliminarily with Mr. Mueller and intend to ask him about. 

    It is a very tough standard to say that a public official is liable for matters that he didn't know about or didn't have reason to know about. But if our Nation's secrets are to be guarded, and if we are to be secure from spies such as Ames and Hanssen, this is a matter that we are going to have to determine as to what is the appropriate standard. 

    When I talked to Mr. Mueller, I didn't ask him for a response, but this is another subject that will be probed during the course of the confirmation hearings. The issues of management in the FBI are just gigantic; they are enormous. We have seen repeated failures by the Federal Bureau of Investigation to come forward with documents in a timely manner. In the McVeigh case, for example, the FBI had reason to know as early as January of this year that all of the documents relating to McVeigh had not been turned over to McVeigh's lawyers. Yet those documents were not made available until May. And then there was the issue about the fairness to McVeigh. No doubt he was guilty; he had confessed to the most horrendous crime in American history, where 168 people were killed in a Federal building in Oklahoma City--women, children, men, going there for official business, blameless, and it was done in a cold, calculated way. 

    There was no doubt as to guilt or as to the justification for the death sentence which was imposed, but there was an obligation on the part of the prosecution to turn over all the papers. There may have been something which bore on sentencing. Here you had a 5-month delay where the Federal Bureau of Investigation had reason to know that all those documents were not turned over. 

    The question is: What is to be done in the management of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to avoid this sort of an error? In an age of computerization and mechanization, we search for an answer and really must find a way that the FBI will correct these kinds of problems. 

     A similar issue was confronted in the Waco matter. It was an incident which occurred on April 19, 1993, where the compound was attacked and where so many people lost their lives in one of the most controversial incidents in American history, but it was not until August of 1999 that the FBI suddenly found a whole ream of records. Here again, management responsibilities require something much, much better than that. 

    The incident at Waco is really a very sad chapter in American history for many reasons: The confrontation, the deaths, the failure of congressional oversight, the failure of candid disclosure by the officials who were in charge. 

    On April 28 of 1993, Attorney General Reno and then FBI Director William Sessions testified before Congress that no pyrotechnic tear gas rounds were used at Waco. The hostage rescue team commander, Richard Rogers, who was present for their testimony but who did not testify, did not correct them. 

     Regrettably, that is an occurrence which has happened too often where there is a concern about the FBI institutional image which blinds people who ought to be coming forward and who ought to be making a disclosure as to what the facts were when there is congressional oversight and you have critical testimony by the Attorney General of the United States and by the Director of the FBI. 

    When Mr. Mueller and I talked yesterday, we discussed at some length the culture of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the difficulties of even the Director finding out what is going on in the FBI. That is a challenging task which Robert Mueller is going to have to confront. 

     In the context of what has happened with Wen Ho Lee, Waco, McVeigh, Hanssen, and the campaign finance investigation, these are issues which need to be very thoroughly explored in the confirmation hearing, and we ought to come to some common understanding between those of us who have oversight responsibilities on the Judiciary Committee and the Director of the FBI as to what his standard will be and what we think the standard should be so that we can come to a meeting of the minds or so that we may not confirm a Director who does not measure up to what Congress thinks is required as a matter of legitimate oversight. 

    At the same time, as I suggested before, Congress has not done its job on oversight. We had the incident at Waco on April 19 of 1993. In my view, there should have been a prompt, detailed, piercing oversight investigation of what went on there. It was not until former Senator Danforth undertook that investigation in 1999 that anything really was done. 

    Who can say as to the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal building 2 years to the day after the Waco incident, when the Oklahoma City bombing occurred on April 19, 1995, whether that was related to the Waco incident or whether it might have been prevented had there been vigorous congressional oversight? 

    In 1995, I served as the chairman of the Subcommittee on Terrorism and moved to have oversight hearings at that time on both Waco and Ruby Ridge because I thought a great deal more needed to be done. Finally, the subcommittee was permitted to have oversight as to Ruby Ridge. 

    That was an incident where Randy Weaver was on the mountain and refused to come down. There was a veritable army which approached him and had a firefight, and a U.S. marshal was killed in the process. 

    The oversight in which the Terrorism Subcommittee got to the bottom of the matter, and to the credit of FBI Director Louis Freeh, the FBI changed the rules of engagement related to the use of deadly force in what was a very important matter. 

    When we finished the hearings, Mr. Weaver said in the hearing room, had he known there was going to be this kind of congressional oversight, he would have come down from the mountain if he had believed there would be an inquiry and an appropriate resolution. 

    It was at that time that militia were springing up in some 40 States across the United States. If Congress exercises appropriate oversight, it is my view that will do a great deal to quell public unrest and public doubts as to what is happening with Federal action in a place such as Ruby Ridge and Federal action in a place such as Waco.

     In summary, these are matters which are of the utmost importance when we will be confirming the next Director of the FBI, an occurrence which happens only once every 10 years because it is a 10-year turn, although a Director may leave earlier. Louis Freeh is leaving after 8 years, a term of office longer than the maximum a President may serve under the Constitution. The Justices of the Supreme Court have enormous power on 5-4 decisions establishing the law of the land, but there are four others who go with the one deciding vote. 

    The FBI, with all of its power--most of what it does is necessarily confidential and secret--requires that there be very profound changes in FBI management on the items which have been mentioned and an attitude that will not emphasize the institutional image to the sacrifice of not having appropriate congressional oversight, not having appropriate congressional disclosure of the memorandum referred to, having appropriate congressional disclosure when a matter is pending, even if it is a criminal matter. 

    Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the full text of the memorandum from Director Freeh, dated December 9, 1996, be printed in the Congressional Record. 

    There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows: 

    [[Page S7440]] 

    December 9, 1996. 

     To: Mr. Esposito. 

     From: Director, FBI. 

    Subject: Democratic National Campaign Matter. Memorandum As I related to you this morning, I met with the Attorney General on Friday, 12/6/96, to discuss the above-captioned matter. 

     I stated that DOJ had not yet referred the matter to the FBI to conduct a full, criminal investigation. It was my recommendation that this referral take place as soon as possible. 

    I also told the Attorney General that since she had declined to refer the matter to an Independent Counsel it was my recommendation that she select a first rate DOJ legal team from outside Main Justice to conduct the inquiry. In fact, I said that these prosecutors should be ``junk-yard dogs'' and that in my view, PIS was not capable of conducting the thorough, aggressive kind of investigation which was required. 

    I also advised the Attorney General of Lee Radek's comment to you that there was a lot of ``pressure'' on him and PIS regarding this case because the ``Attorney General's job might hang in the balance'' (or words to that effect). I stated that those comments would be enough for me to take him and the Criminal Division off the case completely. 

     I also stated that it didn't make sense for PIS to call the FBI the ``lead agency'' in this matter while operating a ``task force'' with DOC IGs who were conducting interviews of key witnesses without the knowledge or participation of the FBI. 

    I strongly recommend that the FBI and hand-picked DOJ attorneys from outside Main Justice run this case as we would any matter of such importance and complexity. 

    We left the conversation on Friday with arrangements to discuss the matter again on Monday. The Attorney General and I spoke today and she asked for a meeting to discuss the ``investigative team'' and hear our recommendations. The meeting is now scheduled for Wednesday, 12/11/96, which you and Bob Litt will also attend. 

    I intend to repeat my recommendations from Friday's meeting. We should present all of our recommendations for setting up the investigation--both AUSAs and other resources. You and I should also discuss and consider whether on the basis of all the facts and circumstances--including Huang's recently released letters to the President as well as Radek's comments--whether I should recommend that the Attorney General reconsider referral to an Independent Counsel. 

    It was unfortunate that DOJ declined to allow the FBI to play any role in the Independent Counsel referral deliberations. I agree with you that based on the DOJ's experience with the Cisneros matter--which was only referred to an Independent Counsel because the FBI and I intervened directly with the Attorney General--it was decided to exclude us from this decision-making process. 

    Nevertheless, based on information recently reviewed from PIS/DOC, we should determine whether or not an Independent Counsel referral should be made at this time. If so, I will make the recommendation to the Attorney General. 

    Mr. SPECTER. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that an extract of a report from CIA Inspector General Frederick Hitz be printed in the Congressional Record. 

    There being no objection, the material was ordered to be printed in the Record, as follows: 

    We have no reason to believe that the DCIs who served during the relevant period were aware of the deficiencies described in this report. But DCIs are obligated to ensure that they are knowledgeable of significant developments related to crucial Agency missions. Sensitive human source reporting on the Soviet Union and Russia during and after the Cold War clearly was such a mission, and certain DCIs must therefore be held accountable for serious shortcomings in that reporting. 

    Mr. SPECTER. I thank the Chair and yield the floor. 

    The ACTING PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Senator from Michigan. 

     

    https://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/21/nyregion/john-c-cheasty-star-witness-in-teamsters-case-dies-at-96.html

     

    John C. Cheasty, Star Witness In Teamsters Case, Dies at 96

    John C. Cheasty, who became the government's star witness after James R. Hoffa of the Teamsters union recruited him to spy on a Senate committee investigating labor racketeering in the 1950's, died June 14 in Bahama, N.C. He was 96.

    The cause was congestive heart failure, Mr. Cheasty's family said. He died at the home of a daughter with whom he had lived for several years, the Rev. Patrice Cheasty-Miller, the pastor of St. Paul United Methodist Church in Durham.

    A New York lawyer and investigator, Mr. Cheasty (pronounced CHASE-tee) figured in an episode that began with Hoffa's offer of big-money bribes. Mr. Cheasty took the first payment straight to Robert F. Kennedy, the chief counsel to the committee Hoffa wanted Mr. Cheasty to infiltrate. Hoffa was arrested after what he believed was a clandestine meeting with Mr. Cheasty in a Washington hotel.

    But a federal jury acquitted Hoffa of bribery and conspiracy charges, fanning a long-running feud between Hoffa and Kennedy.

    Mr. Cheasty began his career as a Treasury agent in the 1930's. After graduating from Manhattan College and Fordham Law School, he worked with the Treasury team that built a tax-evasion case against Enoch L. (Nucky) Johnson, the Republican boss of Atlantic County, N.J.

    As a Navy commander in World War II, he was put in charge of the military base at Luzon, in the Philippines. He was a Navy lawyer in 500 courts-martial after the war before he contracted an illness that was diagnosed as a heart problem and he retired on disability.

    Back home in Brooklyn, after realizing he was not dying, he opened a law practice. He handled tax-evasion cases for Joe Bosano, a nephew of Albert Anastasia, the New York Mafia leader, among others.

    He also made friends with a lawyer named Hyman I. Fischbach, who said a client wanted to infiltrate the Senate committee and find out what it was looking into.

    ''I asked him, 'Who is your client?''' Mr. Cheasty later testified. ''He opened an address book and said 'Jimmy' or 'James Hoffa,' and two phone numbers. I whistled and said, 'Wow, Mr. Big himself.'''

    Mr. Cheasty flew to Detroit for a meeting with Hoffa, then called Kennedy, who arranged for him to join the committee's staff. Kennedy later said Mr. Cheasty had felt Hoffa ''was asking him to betray his country.''

    With Mr. Cheasty's testimony and undercover film showing Hoffa accepting a packet of Senate material, the case seemed solid. Kennedy said he would ''jump off the Capitol dome'' if the government lost.

    But on the day Hoffa testified, the former heavyweight champion Joe Louis walked into the courtroom, threw an arm around Hoffa and told reporters he wanted to ''see what they're doing to my good friend Jimmy Hoffa.''

    Louis's appearance ''undoubtedly had a strong effect on the black members of the jury,'' Walter Sheridan wrote in ''The Rise and Fall of Jimmy Hoffa'' (Saturday Review Press, 1972).

    However, the jury of eight blacks and four whites told reporters that race was not a factor in their verdict; they said that they voted to acquit Hoffa because they did not believe Mr. Cheasty. (Bribery and conspiracy charges against Mr. Fischbach were later dropped.)

    Federal agents kept watch on the Cheasty household for more than a year. Mr. Cheasty's relatives say the F.B.I. gave him the code name Cat.

    After the Hoffa verdict, Mr. Cheasty's old client Mr. Bosano asked for a meeting. He told Mr. Cheasty that a contract had been taken out on him but that ''Uncle Albert'' -- Mr. Anastasia -- had blocked it.

    Mr. Cheasty worked on John F. Kennedy's presidential campaign in 1960 and later moved his law practice to Washington for a few years before returning to New York. After he retired at 87 in 1994, he told his family that in the 60's and 70's he had been a contract employee of the Central Intelligence Agency.

    In addition to Ms. Cheasty-Miller, he is survived by two other daughters, Virginia Lucey of Old Greenwich, Conn., and Mary Kornman of New York; two sons, John C., of Clarksville, Tenn., and Robert C., of Berkeley, Calif.; and 16 grandchildren. Mr. Cheasty's wife, Virginia, died in 1998.

    A version of this article appears in print on June 21, 2004, Section B, Page 6 of the National edition with the headline: John C. Cheasty, Star Witness In Teamsters Case, Dies at 96.  
     

     

     https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/other-courts/2004/2004-51580.html
     
     

    Rocco v Pension Plan of NY State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund

    Annotate this Case
    [*1] Rocco v Pension Plan of NY State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund 2004 NY Slip Op 51580(U) Decided on December 13, 2004 Supreme Court, Kings County Lewis, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

    Decided on December 13, 2004
    Supreme Court, Kings County

    Thomas Rocco and Dorothy Casey, on behalf of themselves and all other active, retired and vested participants and their surviving spouses and estates of the Brewery Fund Pension Plan who were denied benefits under the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Plan from on or about August 12, 1973, Plaintiffs,

    against

    The Pension Plan of the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund, The Board of Trustees of the Pension Plan of the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund and all predecessor Trustees who have served as such since 1973, Defendants.



    31804/02

    Yvonne Lewis, J.

    This court has been requested by the captioned plaintiffs to certify the within action as a class action pursuant to CPLR 901 and 902, with the following individuals designated as the members thereof; to wit,"all individuals who are or were participants or beneficiaries of participants in the Brewery Workers Pension Plan (Brewery Plan) as of August 7, 1973 when the agreement to merge the Brewery Fund and the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund (Teamsters Fund) was executed, who ceased to be active participants prior to December 1976 and who elected to receive benefits under the terms of the plan of benefits of the Teamsters Fund and who did not receive benefits under the terms of the plan of benefits of the Teamsters Fund." It is asserted by the plaintiffs that class certification is warranted herein since "all members of the putative class are receiving or have received benefits under the terms of the Brewery Plan; however, these benefits are less than the benefits they would have receive[d] under the terms of the merger agreement. . .which they seek to obtain in this case." More to the point, the plaintiffs contend that the agreement to merge the Brewery Plan and the Teamsters Plan, signed by the respective trustees on July 30, 1973 and August 7, 1973, was violated by the absence of contributions on their behalf on or after December 1, 1976.

    The subject merger was to become effective thirty days after notification to the parties that the Internal Revenue Service had approved their individual agreements. Accordingly, the parties were each required to forthwith seek that approval and to ". . .execute or cause to be executed any and all documents necessary to implement this Agreement." The Teamsters not only failed to abide by the foregoing terms, but on February 4, 1974 voted not to proceed with the merger, which resulted in the initiation of litigation for the specific performance of said merger. [*2]On April 11, 1975, The Queens County Supreme Court upheld the merger and directed the Teamsters to comply, which they failed to do. Consequently, on April 29, 1976, the Brewery Fund Trustees applied for the IRS approval on behalf of the Teamsters. On September 28, 1976, the IRS issued a letter of approval, and the New York State Supreme Court thereafter, in a supplemental enforcement proceeding, ". . .declared that the Brewery Fund was 'fully integrated' with the Teamsters Fund as of December 1, 1976." Brewery Workers Pension Fund et. al. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund, et. al., No. 9997/74 (NY Sup. Ct., April 12, 1977). On two subsequent occasions, the Teamsters were held in contempt for refusing to adhere to the terms of the merger, which they purged ". . .by inter alia, accepting the Brewery Fund assets and giving notice to Brewery Fund members. Nevertheless, they ultimately refused to provide higher Teamsters Fund benefits to participants, like Plaintiffs, who were actively employed when the Merger Agreement was executed and who 'but for' Defendants' wrongful conduct, would have been actively employed on the merger's effective date (had the IRS approval been sought as required under the Agreement), but who, due to an intervening plant closing, were no longer employed on December 1, 1976." It is also the plaintiffs' contention that they are entitled to benefits under the merger agreement under state common law claims, and that the "prevention doctrine" would bar the defendant from effectively arguing as to any delay in effective merger date since the defendant was the cause of such delay. The plaintiffs further contend that the requirements for class certification under CPLR 901 fully apply, in that the size of the claimants makes joinder impracticable; there exists questions of law and fact common to the class that predominates any individual concerns; and, the captioned individuals typify the concerns of the other class members, and will adequately represent their interests. In addition, the plaintiffs assert that the defendants' act of suing them as a class in prior litigation for a finding that ". . .the class of former Brewery Fund participants for whom no contributions were made on or after December 1, 1976, were not entitled to receive benefits under the terms of the Teamsters plan," was a tacit admission that a class action is appropriate. In that case, Brewery Delivery Employees Local Union No. 46, IBT, et. al. v. Mosely, et. al., Civ. 80-1476 (E.D.NY), the parties settled on an agreement that the statute of limitations would be tolled for "rights or claims which may be asserted against the Fund by members of Local 46 on whose behalf contributions were made into the Brewery Workers Pension Fund between 1973 and 1976 and who were not given the option to elect to become members of the New York State Teamsters Conference Pension and Retirement Fund." The plaintiffs also note that in prior unrelated litigation involving the Teamsters, Miele v. NYS Teamsters Pension Fund, 81 Civ. 0084, the Teamsters had furnished

    ". . .a computer print-out of all participants in the Brewery Pension Plan who, following the effective date of the Merger Agreement between the Brewers and Teamsters Pension Funds, were denied benefits under the Teamsters Plan. . . .a total of 1,148 members."

    In response to the foregoing, the defendants cross-moved this court for an order, pursuant to CPLR §§501 and 510(3), to transfer the within matter to the New York State Supreme Court in Onondaga County as a more convenient forum. They predicated that request on the fact that

    ". . .(1) the rules of the Pension Fund mandate that any action brought against it be commenced in the County of Onondaga, (2) the convenience of material witnesses and interest of justice support a change in venue[,] and (3) the Southern District specifically ruled in the previously dismissed federal court action brought by Plaintiffs that the most convenient forum is the County [*3]of Onondaga, to which it transferred the matter. Seitz, et. al. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund, 953 F. Supp. 100 (S.D.NY 1997)." The defendants also contend that, by its terms, the merger agreement resulted in two entities, the Pension Fund and the Brewery Plan and, that "[t]his meant that, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, only Brewery members who worked and had contributions made on their behalf after December 1, 1976 were eligible to have a portion of their benefits determined under the Pension Fund's Plan. All other Brewery members, like Plaintiff Rocco and Mr. Casey, were eligible for benefits solely under the Brewery Plan." Plaintiff Rocco ". . .ceased being a member of the Brewery Fund on March 26, 1976 and received an Early pension under the Brewery Plan effective June 1, 1984. . . .Mr. Casey retired on a Disability Pension under the brewery Plan effective February 1, 1976. He died on March 9, 1982." The defendants further note that all prior litigation, ". . .some 22 federal and state courts over the last 28 years have also recognized that the effective date of the Brewery Merger was December 1, 1976 and that this is the operative date for determining a Brewery member's eligibility for benefits." In their memorandum of law, the defendants also highlight the fact that the Northern District Court, in the matter of Seitz, et. al. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund, 97-CV 232, went on to confirm the December 1, 1976 effective merger date (Jan. 7, 2000); determine that it had jurisdiction under ERISA to adjudicate plaintiffs' claims; dismiss plaintiffs' complaint on the merits for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief could be granted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (Aug. 7, 2000); find that plaintiffs were without standing to assert such claims (June 9, 2000) as they were not participants or beneficiaries in the Pension Fund's Plan; and, finally, that plaintiffs failed to plead or argue any pendant claims under New York common law or statute. The defendants reinforce the foregoing by noting that said rulings were upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Seitz, et. al. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund, 281 F.3d 62 (2nd Cir. 2002) and that the U.S. Supreme Court denied Certiorari. Furthermore, the defendants argue that by virtue of the holdings aforementioned, the plaintiffs are barred from asserting any claims under New York State law by the principles of res judicata since "a final judgment on the merits of an action precludes the parties or their privies from re-litigating issues that were or could have been raised in that action." (Citing Meagher v. Cement and Concrete Workers' Pension Fund, 921 F. Supp. 161, 164 (S.D.NY 1997); Hennessey v. Cement and Concrete Workers, 963 F. Supp, 963 F. Supp. 334, 337 (S.D.NY 1997), and a host of other cases, including Buechel v. Bain, 97 NY2d 295, 740 NYS2d 252 in its reply memorandum of law), and/or collateral estoppel since ". . . an issue of fact or law actually litigated and decided by a court of competent jurisdiction in a prior action may not be re-litigated in a subsequent suit between the same parties or their privies." (Citing, United States v. Alcan Aluminum corp., 990 F.2d 711 (2d Cir. 1993), citing Montana v. United States, 440 U.S. 147, 153 (1979); Remington Rand Corporation v. Amsterdam Rotterdam Bank, 68 F.3d 478 (2d Cir. 1995), etc. The defendants also distinguish the fact that David Seitz, unlike the plaintiffs herein, had been a member of Local 46 who had made contributions to the Pension Fund after December 1, 1976.

    With regards to class certification, the defendants point out that CPLR §902 specifically required that the plaintiffs had to have moved therefor within sixty days after the filing of its responsive pleading herein, and that the courts may not extend this period (citing in particular, [*4]O'Hara v. Del Bello, 47 NY2d 363, 418 NYS2d 334). Accordingly, since its answer was filed on September 19, 2002 and the plaintiffs did not make this motion until June 4, 2003, they are barred therefrom. In addition, the defendants note that the tolling of the statute of limitations afforded by the Mosley, infra settlement, by its terms, applied only and specifically from the filing of that action in 1980 until its settlement in 1990, not to the within action which was commenced some twelve years after execution of the settlement agreement.

    In their reply, the plaintiffs note that this action was remanded to state court after the date that the defendants assert that the instant motion should have been filed. Consequently, their motion can in no way be viewed as untimely. In addition, the plaintiffs argue that "the 60 day requirement is not a statute of limitations, and a motion for class certification may be granted under appropriate circumstances even if it is brought after the expiration of that period." (Citing, John Bourdeau, Paul Coltoff, Christine M. Gimeno, 3A Carmody-Wait 2d §§19:395, a fourth department case, and some miscellaneous opinions). The plaintiffs then reassert their arguments for class certification, along with pointing out that the defendants have not filed an answer in state court; i.e, in this action. With regards to the request for change of venue, the plaintiffs argue that in Seitz, et. al. v. New York State Teamsters Conference Pension & Retirement Fund, supra, 953 F. Supp. 100 (S.D.NY 1997), "[t]he Eastern District of New York, which encompasses Kings County, was found to be a proper venue after the issue was briefed before Judge Batts in the Southern District of New York;" however, the plaintiffs concede that his opinion was silent vis-a-vis the "purported plan rule requiring venue in the county of Onondaga. . ." In any event, the plaintiffs assert that the trustees exceeded their authority in adopting such a rule as "[t]here is nothing in the Trust Agreement that permits the Trustees to abridge Plaintiffs' rights by adopting a venue provision or to limit or regulate litigation against or by the Fund."

    The Defendants, in response to the foregoing, submitted a reply memorandum which essentially reiterated their position against class certification and for a change of venue, save to assert that the plaintiffs had not initially quantified the number of the purported class in its original motion, but only did so in their supplemental affirmation on the basis of archival material, which they were unable to provide via discovery since ". . . Josephine Dontino, the person who allegedly generated the document some 25 years ago, retired from the pension fund, is in her 80's and is incapacitated. This is one of the reasons why this action is also barred by the statute of limitation since said statutes are designed to protect defendants against the elements of time, notably, the loss of evidence and faded memories of witnesses." (Citing Carmody Wait 2d, "Limitation of Actions,"§13.2 (1994) (the policy behind the statutes of limitation is to protect defendants from the revival of claims where 'evidence has been lost, memories have faded and witnesses have disappeared')." (Citing Meyers v. Frank, 550 F.2d 726 (2nd Cir.), cet. Denied, 434 U.S. 830 (1977); Vastola v. Maer, 39 NY2d 1019, 387 NYS2d 246 (1976), McCarthy v. Volkswagen of America, 55 NY2d 543; etc.) Insofar as its failure to have submitted an answer is concerned, the defendants argue that their response in the federal matterserved after removal but prior to remand to state courtis sufficient, especially in light of the fact that the plaintiffs had agreed to an extension of time for service of the same. Lastly, with regards to the plaintiff's argument that the trustees exceeded their authority in adopting a venue rule, the defendants argue that ". . .the venue rule was adopted by the Pension Fund's trustees pursuant to ERISA and the Agreement and Declaration of Trust. The right to adopt a venue derives from the Trustees' [*5]'exclusive authority to control and manage the operation and administration of the plan' and fiduciary mandates imposed upon them by ERISA. In this regard, ERISA provides that 'Every employee benefit plan shall be established and maintained pursuant to a written instrument. . .and the fiduciaries. . .shall have the authority to control and manage the operation and administration of the plan. 29 U.S.C. §1102(a)(1)." Finally, the defendants assert that since the venue rule applies to participants as well as applicants of the Plan, it is immaterial that the plaintiffs are not members of the Plan. The fact is that "[t]he plaintiffs here applied for benefits under the Pension Fund's Plan and were denied because they did not have contributions made after December 1, 1976, the 'effective date' of the Brewery Merger as adjudicated by the courts."

    CPLR § 901 provides, in pertinent part, that "one or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all if: 1. the class is so numerous that joinder of all members whether otherwise required or permitted, is impracticable; 2. there are questions of law or fact common to the class which predominate over any questions affecting only individual members; 3. the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; 4. the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class; and, 5. a class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy. CPLR § 902 adds that "within sixty days after the time to serve a responsive pleading has expired for all persons named as defendants in an action brought as a class action, the plaintiff shall move for an order to determine whether it is to be so maintained. An order under this section may be conditional, and may be altered or amended before the decision on the merits on the court's own motion or on motion of the parties. The action may be maintained as a class action only if the court finds that the prerequisites under section 901 have been satisfied. Among the matters which the court shall consider in determining whether the action may proceed as a class action are: 1. The interest of members of the class in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions; 2. The impracticability or inefficiency of prosecuting or defending separate actions; 3. The extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already commenced by or against members of the class; 4. The desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the claim in the particular forum; and 5. The difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of a class action."

    The controversy presented by the various arguments of the parties is whether the plaintiffs meet the statutory prerequisites and have timely moved for class certification, or whether prior judicial proceedings have resolved that determination and therefore preclude any reexamination thereof on the basis of res judicata and/or collateral estoppel. This court cannot proceed to make that analysis, however, in light of the venue issue herein presented. The law is clearly established that "contractual forum selection clauses are prima facie valid and enforceable." (See McIntosh County Bank, et. al. v. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, 4 Misc 3d 1017(A), 2004 WL 1878201 (NY Sup.), 2004 NY Slip Op. 50920(U), citing Premium Risk Group, Inc. v. Legion Insurance company, 294 AD2d 345 (2nd Dept., 2002); and Koko Contracting Inc. v. Environmental Asbestos Removal Corp., 272 AD2d 585 (2d Dept., 2000). Although the plaintiffs argue that the trustees did not have the authority to designate Onondaga county as the forum for any fund disputes, they have failed to convincingly demonstrate that agreeing to such a contractual provision is de hors the bounds of permissible and/or legitimate contractual parameters, much less fiduciary action. The fact is that "[i]n order to set aside such a clause, the party seeking to do [*6]so must establish that enforcement of the clause would be unreasonable or unjust, that the venue selection clause is void because of fraud or overreaching or that permitting the matter to proceed to trial in the venue established by the contract would be so difficult and inconvenient to the party challenging the provision [that he or she] would effectively [be] denied his or her day in court. (See McIntosh County Bank, et. al. v. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, 4 Misc 3d 1017(A), supra, citing Hunt v. Landers, 309 AD2d 900 (2nd Dept., 2003); and Hirschman v. National Textbook Company, 184 AD2d 494 [2d. Dept., 1992]). The McIntosh County Bank, et. al. v. St. Regis Mohawk Tribe, 4 Misc 3d 1017(A), supra, court went on to aptly note that "Agreements are to be interpreted in accordance with their plain meaning."(citing Green field v. Philles Records, Inc., 98 NY2d 562 (2002); Katina, Inc. v. Famiglietti, 306 AD2d 440 [2nd Dept., 2003]). "The court may not make a new agreement for the parties under the guise of interpretation." (Citing Rodolitz v. Neptune Paper Products, Inc., 22 NY2d 383 [1968]. See also, Iacobacci v. McAleavey, 222 AD3d 406 [2d Dept., 1995]). Accordingly, this court sees no other alternative than to have the within matter transferred to the Supreme court of Onondaga County pursuant to the terms of the parties' Merger agreement above discussed.

    WHEREFORE, on the basis of the foregoing, the defendants' motion for a change of venue is granted, and the plaintiffs' request for class certification is hereby deferred to the Supreme Court of Onondaga County. In addition, the Kings County Clerk is hereby directed to forthwith transfer the case file to the Onondaga Supreme Court for its deliberations. This constitutes the decision and order of this Court.

    _______________________________

    JSC
     

    Masks are here 'for the foreseeable future,' health minister says

    $
    0
    0

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-19-new-brunswick-masks-shephard-moncton-circuit-breaker-1.6243555

     

    N.B. COVID-19 roundup: Masks are here 'for the foreseeable future,' health minister says

    Delta variant means no end in sight for mask mandate, says Dorothy Shephard

    Masks are here to stay "for the foreseeable future," said Dorothy Shephard.

    She made the comment to reporters Tuesday when asked what more the province can do to combat COVID-19, when new daily COVID-19 case counts continue to hover between roughly 40 and 50, and the Moncton region, Zone 1, in particular remains a concern, despite a month-long circuit breaker.

    "Well, I think we always knew that in the end, we're going to be living with COVID. And that's the … important nuance that we've got, I think … to get to an acceptance of," she said.

    "I also think that we know now, with the reality of what's happened with [the] delta [variant], that masks are in our future for the foreseeable future."

    The highly transmissible variant is driving the fourth wave of the pandemic. It has also increased the vaccination target to achieve so-called herd immunity, where having a certain proportion of the population vaccinated protects others who aren't immunized.

    The original goal was to have 75 per cent of New Brunswickers aged 12 and older fully vaccinated. The new target is to have at least 90 per cent of the total population— not just the eligible population — double-dosed.

    As of Tuesday afternoon, 75.9 per cent of the total population had received two doses, while 82 per cent had received one dose, according to the CBC tracker.

    New Brunswickers … have a lot of power in preventing the spread of COVID and any of the variants. And so we just ask for their help every single day.
    - Dorothy Shephard, health minister

    Shephard said household transmissions account for most new cases of COVID-19 in the province and urged everyone to keep their number of contacts as low as possible.

    "And so I think only what we can do is to continue to remind New Brunswickers that, you know, they have a lot of power in preventing the spread of COVID and any of the variants. And so we just ask for their help every single day."

    The circuit breaker, which restricts private gatherings and non-essential travel to help limit the spread of the virus and keep more people out of hospital, covers Zone 1 as far north as, and including, Sainte-Anne-de-Kent and a large section of the Saint John region, Zone 2, including New River Beach and Lepreau, north to the communities of Clarendon and Welsford, east to the community of Head of Millstream, and all of the communities in Saint John and Kings counties.

    It's expected to continue until at least Friday at 6 p.m.

    Health officials will have more to say later this week about whether a circuit breaker might be needed in the Miramichi region, Zone 7, said Shephard. There are outbreaks at the homeless shelter and at Nelson Rural School.

    Masks have been mandatory in all indoor public spaces since Sept. 21 at 11:59 p.m. Public Health recommended the renewed mask mandate to ensure people could continue to have access to urgent care, intensive care beds, and hospital beds when they need it, Chief Medical Officer of Health Dr. Jennifer Russell said at the time.

    523 active cases

    Public Health reported 52 new cases of COVID-19 on Tuesday, bumping the province's active case count up to 523.

    Sixteen people are in hospital because of the virus, including 10 in intensive care.

    A total of 86.1 per cent of New Brunswickers 12 or older are fully vaccinated, and 92.9 per cent have received their first vaccine dose.

    New Brunswick has had 6,865 confirmed cases of COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic, with 6,220 recoveries so far and 121 COVID-related deaths.

    A total of 532,024 lab tests have been conducted, including 1,304 on Monday.

    Public exposure notices

    For the full list of new and previous public exposure notices, please visit the government of New Brunswick's website.

    People who have not been fully vaccinated at least 14 days prior to a possible exposure and who have symptoms should still get a COVID lab test. They can book an appointment online or call Tele-Care 811 and must isolate while waiting for their test result.

    People who are not fully vaccinated and do not have symptoms, are now being instructed to pick up an At-Home COVID-19 Rapid Point of Care Test (Rapid POCT) screening kit. They do not need to isolate if they have not been directed by Public Health to do so.

    All positive point of care test results must be confirmed with a laboratory polymerase chain reaction, or PCR test.

    It can take up to 14 days to test positive after being exposed to COVID-19 so even if their results comes back negative, they should continue to self-monitor for any symptoms and get tested immediately if any develop.

    They should also avoid visiting settings with vulnerable populations, such as nursing homes, correctional facilities and shelters during that 14-day period.

    For people who have been fully vaccinated at least 14 days prior to a possible exposure, Public Health recommends they monitor for symptoms for 14 days after the possible exposure and get a COVID lab test if symptoms develop.

    They do not need to isolate while they wait for their test results.

    If they do not have symptoms, they can pick up a rapid test kit and do not need to isolate.

    What to do if you have a symptom

    People concerned they might have COVID-19 can take a self-assessment test online.

    Public Health says symptoms of the illness have included a fever above 38 C, a new or worsening cough, sore throat, runny nose, headache, a new onset of fatigue, and difficulty breathing.

    In children, symptoms have also included purple markings on the fingers and toes.

    People with one of those symptoms should stay at home, call 811 or their doctor and follow instructions.

    With files from Jacques Poitras

    Viewing all 3457 articles
    Browse latest View live