Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all 3475 articles
Browse latest View live

President Trump Seeks Dismissal of Fraud Lawsuit Filed by His Niece, Says It’s ‘Laden with Conspiracy Theories’

$
0
0

 https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies

 

Image
Mary L Trump
Nailed it. Thank you, my friend.
 
Donald Trump would be wise to avoid advocating prosecution of presidential families for federal tax crimes.
 
 
Image
Replying to @MaryLTrump
Methinks I can capitalize on your spit and chew with @realDonaldTrump and finally force the Taxman to act ethically on both sides of the 49th N'esy Pas? @JustinTrudeau@DiLebouthillier@CanRevAgency@IRS_CI
 
 
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/05/cra-signs-secret-settlement-with.html
 
 
#FATCA#CRA#IRS
 
 

 
Image
I'm pretty sure that Donald is extremely tired of Joe Biden's winning. Congratulations--yet again--to President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.
 
 
Image
Replying to @MaryLTrump
YO @realDonaldTrump One of your former lawyers cannot deny its been over 5 years since we crossed paths Correct? 
 
 
Methinks your lawyers and your niece should check my work ASAP before I file another lawsuit mentioning you and the taxman etc N'esy Pas? 
 
 
Image
Mary L Trump
This is what every Democrat in Congress needs to say--because it's all true:
 
“Right now, the most serious attempt to overthrow our democracy in the history of our of country is underway. Those who are pushing to make Donald Trump President, no matter the outcome of the election, are engaged in a treachery against their nation.”
 
 
Image
Replying to @MaryLTrump
I strongly disagree Methinks the citizens are entitled to have their votes properly tallied N'esy Pas? Even though people such as @annvandersteel and @PatrickByrne ignore my concerns for political reasons no doubt it does not follow that I ignore theirs
 


DECEMBER 25 STEEL TRUTH'S CHRISTMAS SPECIAL

6,064 views
Streamed live 111 minutes ago

Special Guest: Mel Krell https://twitter.com/impulsivewoman

 

72 Comments

David Amos
Enjoy your next email from me
 
David Amos
@Steven Kerr Whose God?
 
R D
@David AmosIsn't there just one god but called different names by different people?
 
David Amos
@R D Trust that I don't care to argue at Xmasstime how many gods there may be. 
 
Methinks Trump's lawyers should agree that the devil is always in the details no matter whom their god may be N'esy Pas? 
 
 
At least your god knew that i was not joking about Tweeting Trump and his niece whether or not you believed me or even cared EH?
 

 

Last Posts Within The Live Chat

Robert Justice​I think Lynn Wood is highly overworked and is seeing monsters in the shadows. He is a great guy but maybe has some things wrong

 
Judy OCIA
 
Theresa C
 Yes the bombing is connected to the election and dominion etc. also to shut down the emergency broadcast system and probably more.
 
David Amos 
Guess who just tweeted this to Trump and his niece?
 
Kim Of Pittsburgh
 @Tami agreed!
 
Mike S 
Agreed, this is James Bond level gaming,
 
Faceless Nameless Rando
 @Tami Cyr Hawkins wot? Pence is a clone? No way
 
Hobbytrem 
DEEP STATE = MASONRY 

b j 
Patrick hanging there at the Hotel room with Sidney Powell is enough proof for me
 
Hobbytrem 
It is the real name of that disgrace.
 
dekonfrost7
 A replay of the interview
 
Beulah Nix
 Is that a about a certain House Member.
 
Kim Of Pittsburgh 
they are  s
 
Kathleen Walters
 the Clinton's live in New York
 
Frank Evans
 Prolly spook contractors
 
Gail Frances 
Pence being a clone is crazy talk.
 
Jacquelin Caruso 
I feel like we are living in a suspensemovie! Can we just get to the end!
 
Veronica Crespo RN
 right now you're so frustrating because you are up against us right now spill the darn beans
 
HobbytremSchiff is a bizarre daemon.
 
Faceless Nameless RandoNot revealing?
 
Mark G 
 What happened to Qanon?
 
sendthistojohn
 Lyn Wood's playing Broadway Stage Mgr. The show's already over. He just want's to keep them shouting, to make mop-up and full-disclosure easier.
 
Hobbytrem 
GREAT QUESTION
 
Faceless Nameless RandoMore secrets no proof
 
b jbeen Cloning since 1945
 
Veronica Crespo RNhow do these people sleep with this information? I guess they don't sleep
 
David AmosToo bad so sad you folks did not answer my email yesterday EH?
 
Robert Justice@Mark G - Countdown to Jan 6th
 
Kim Of Pittsburgh
 MEDBEDS are for clones! much DISINFO on medmeds
 
chris doe 
 Big Mike is big
 
Jeff Z 
Bryne is a fraud.
 
Sakib H 
 WELL GO TELL HIM NOW!!!!
 
Kathy Dawson 
Nothing surprises me.
 
Mark G 
@robert justice will see what happens
 
Veronica Crespo RN
 this guy reminds me of Corey Feldman all these secrets but they don't spill the beans
 
Gail Frances 
I do not believe Pence is a clone. Why would he be cloned? It doesn't make any sense.
 
Dubon Js
 I think Patrick is on our side! but he is not who he claims he is. He is some trained intelligence guy probably from Israel. this is just my opinion , and I am probably wrong. but he knows a lot.
 
James P. 
Bradley for US SenateAll roads lead to Obama
 
Judy O 
This is a replay and I prayed for Patrick’s safety I was so worried of him being killed
 
Kim Of Pittsburgh 
many talking up the Medbeds not good
 
Mary Cantu
 I thought this was LIVE???
 
sendthistojohn 
The President of the United States NEEDs two minutes with Patrick Byrne to totally explain his last 4 years, with clarity, ... DESPERATELY!!!...NOT.
 
Heidi Andrews
 agree pence is a clone.
 
Mark G 
@jeff there is something about him. He came out of nowhere ... to this lead role
 
Frank Evans 
No freaking clones!,,
 
Kathy Dawson
 I’m sure potus has Powell’s number. And Vic Verda.
 
H K 
its a miracle that Patrick is even still alive. Hes got to be extremely scared.
 
Tami Cyr Hawkins 
 
Justice Roberts is compromised! On Ebsteins flight log.
 
Judy O 
Thank you Ann
 
Kathy Dawson 
The fly was CGI
 
Veronica Crespo 
RNJFK said. the very word secrecy is repugnant.
 .
David Amos 
Go Figure what these people are ignoring 
https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
 
Judy OMerry 
Christmas Patriots
 
rob sinclaire 
Merry Christmas Ann and friends!
 
MsSkilledgamerBless You Ann
 
Kim Of Pittsburgh
 Pence tried to kill POTUS TREASON!
 
Alan Speaight
 PE
 
There was more but it was edited out perhaps not intentionally

Somebody said spill the beans and I replied that I just did

and somebody else said they wished they could go to the USA and I replied Me Too My children live there 

 

https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/president-trump-seeks-dismissal-of-fraud-lawsuit-filed-his-niece-says-its-laden-with-conspiracy-theories/ 

 

President Trump Seeks Dismissal of Fraud Lawsuit Filed by His Niece, Says It’s ‘Laden with Conspiracy Theories’

Donald Trump and his sister Maryanne Trump Barry

President Donald Trump and his sister Maryanne Trump Barry on Wednesday each asked a judge in New York to toss a lawsuit filed by the president’s niece which alleges that the Trump family conspired to fraudulently swindle her out of her inheritance.

In a motion to dismiss filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, the president’s attorneys said the suit was based on a series of falsehoods and argued that it was too late for Mary Trump to bring a lawsuit over her alleged claim to the estate of Fred Trump, who died in 1999.

Read: Fred Trump’s will

“Plaintiff makes outlandish and incredulous accusations in her Complaint, which is laden with conspiracy theories more befitting a Hollywood screenplay than a pleading in a legal action. Plaintiff even uses the thematic structure of a play to contrive a decades-long sinister plot in which she claims her aunt and uncles conspired with reputable lawyers, appraisers and other professionals to defraud her,” the motion stated.

In her September lawsuit, Mary alleged that her uncle Donald, her aunt Maryanne, and the president’s recently deceased brother Robert Trump, engaged in “rampant fraud and misconduct” to give her less of an inheritance than she deserved. The lawsuit began by describing the Trump family’s alleged decades-old scheme to “cheat on their taxes, swindle their business partners, and jack up rents on their low-income tenants.”

The suit broke down the Trump family’s alleged scheme into three parts: the “Grift,” the “Devaluing,” and the “Squeeze Out.”

Trump’s lawyers said Mary Trump is just trying leverage her family’s name for money.

“Neatly packaging the conspiracy as such, Plaintiff casts herself as the unknowing and unsophisticated victim. Quite the contrary, from her very public appearances this past year, it is apparent that Plaintiff has orchestrated a sophisticated plan to exact retribution for decades old, previously litigated family grievances to further her own political agenda and cash in on her family name,” the motion stated. “Plaintiff herself articulates no direct or specific evidence to substantiate her claims of fraud and conspiracy. Instead, she simply refers to a New York Times story published on October 2, 2018 which purported to demonstrate that Defendant, Donald J. Trump, inherited wealth from his parents and was not totally self-made, a narrative the authors and, no doubt, the New York Times itself were eager to push.”

Attorneys for Maryanne Trump Barry—who served as a federal judge for more than 30 years—also filed a motion to dismiss, similarly categorizing Mary Trump’s claims as “nothing more than conclusory allegations” of fraud “drawn directly from a New York Times investigative report,” based on documents provided to the newspaper by Mary herself.

“If the New York Times was able to divine this claimed ‘fraud’ in less than a year, surely Plaintiff could have done so within the applicable limitations period,” Maryanne Trump Barry’s attorneys argued.

The fraud lawsuit came after Mary Trump’s legal battle to publish her tell-all book about the Trump family.

Roberta Kaplan, an attorney for Mary Trump, said her client’s complaint speaks for itself.

“Donald Trump and his siblings defrauded their own niece out of tens of millions of dollars in connection with interests she inherited from her father, as has recently come to light,” Kaplan said in a statement to Law&Crime. “While it is true that Mary Trump is no fan of Donald Trump or his policies, that fraud is what this case is about. We are confident that the evidence will show and a jury will decide that that is exactly what happened.”

Read both motions to dismiss below:

Trump MTD by Law&Crime on Scribd

Maryanne Trump Barry MTD by Law&Crime on Scribd

Editor’s note: story updated post-publication with a statement from Mary Trump’s lawyer.

[image via ED Jones/AFP via Getty Images]

Have a tip we should know? tips@lawandcrime.com

 

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF NEW YORK: COMMERCIAL DIVISION

MARY L. TRUMP, Index # 654698/2020


Plaintiff,
AFFIRMATION
IN SUPPORT
-against- OF DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS
PURSUANT TO 3211(a)(5) & (7)
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his personal capacity,
MARYANNE TRUMP BARRY, and SHAWN
HUGHES, the executor of the ESTATE OF
ROBERT S. TRUMP, in his capacity as executor,
Defendants

James D. Kiley, Esq., an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the Courts of the
State of New York, hereby affirms and states:


(1) I am a partner in the law firm of Kiley, Kiley & Kiley, PLLC, attorneys for the
Defendants, Donald J. Trump and Shawn Hughes, the executor of the Estate of Robert S. Trump,
and I am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this action. That my knowledge comes
from a review of the files from Plaintiff’s previous litigation with Defendants dating back to 2001
and of the corporate records of the various entities named in Plaintiff’s Complaint.


(2) I make this Affirmation in support of said Defendants’ motion to dismiss all actions
stated in the Complaint in their entirety pursuant to CPLR § 3211(a)(5) & (7).


(3) The plaintiff, Mary L. Trump, brought the instant action against her uncle, Donald
J. Trump, her aunt, the Honorable Maryanne Trump Barry and the estate of her uncle, Robert S.
Trump by filing a Summons and Complaint on or about September 24, 2020 alleging eight separate
causes of action for fraud, civil conspiracy and breach of fiduciary duty. (Exhibit “A”)

 

 KAPLAN HECKER & FINK LLP
350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7110
New York, NY 10118
(212) 763-0883
(212) 564-0883 Fax
rkaplan@kaplanhecker.com
jquinn@kaplanhecker.com
arodney@kaplanhecker.com
 

James D. Kiley Esq.
KILEY, KILEY& KILEY PLLC 
3000 Marcus Ave., Ste. 3W07
Lake Success, NY 11042 U.S.A.
Phone: (516) 466-7900
JDKiley@kileylawfirm.com 


GREENFIELD, STEIN & SENIOR LLP
600 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10118
(212) 818-9336
212-818-1264 Fax
gfriedman@gss-law.com
jsheetz@gss-law.com

 

 

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/politics/a32946840/who-is-mary-trump-donald-niece/

What to Know About Mary L. Trump, Donald Trump's Niece and Author of Too Much and Never Enough

She's largely stayed out of the spotlight—until now.

too much and never enough
  • Donald Trump's niece, Mary Trump, released a tell-all book about the President and his family earlier this summer.
  • In the book, Mary reveals that she was a source for a landmark New York Times investigation.
  • A couple months later, in September, Mary filed a lawsuit against the President and his siblings, claiming they defrauded her out of her share of her grandfather's wealth.

When Donald Trump moved into the White House, more than a few of his family members stepped into the spotlight alongside him. It seems not a day goes by that the public doesn't hear about a Trump child's exploits, whether it be Ivanka's poorly-timed Instagram posts or Don Jr.'s right-wing pronouncements; even lesser-known figures, like Donald's sister Maryanne Trump Barry, have found themselves under renewed scrutiny.

But until very recently, the President's niece, Mary Trump, had been hardly heard from at all. With the publishing of her book about her uncle—which prompted a legal skirmish and then set sales records on its first day—that's all changed. In recent months, she's continued to make television appearances to speak about Trump, and filed a lawsuit against the President and his siblings in September.

Here, what you should know about Mary Lea Trump.

She's the daughter of Fred Trump Jr., Donald's older brother.

Mary is the eldest grandchild of patriarch Fred Trump Sr., and the daughter of Fred Trump Jr., the second of Fred Sr. and Mary Trump's five children. Fred Trump Jr. died from a heart attack due to complications from alcoholism, at age 42 in 1981. He left behind two children—Mary L. Trump and Fred Trump III, both teenagers at the time—with Linda Lee Clapp, his former wife.

Fred Jr.'s death left enduring scars on the family, including his younger brother, the now-President. Fred Sr. had hoped that Fred Jr. would take over the family business, but Fred Jr. was reticent to do so, preferring to pursue a career as a pilot. "There was a lot of tension between not only the old man but also between him and Donald," one of Fred Jr.'s friends, Annamaria Forcier, told the Washington Post in 2019. "There was a lot of tension because they didn’t want him to be an airline pilot."

Famously, Fred Jr.'s struggle with alcoholism would put Donald off drinking entirely. Donald Trump told the Washington Post, "I do regret having put pressure on him."

fred trump in atlantic city

Fred Trump Sr., photographed in 1988.Jeffrey AsherGetty Images

Mary has mostly stayed out of the spotlight.

Unlike some other members of her family, Mary has chosen to live largely under the radar. Not much is known about her personal life, other than that the 55-year-old lives with her daughter in New York. Mary holds a master's degree in literature from Columbia University and a doctorate in psychology from Adelphi University, per CNN. According to her biography on the Simon & Schuster website, she's taught courses in trauma, psychopathology, and developmental psychology.

She does have a Twitter account, in which she hints at her political views. In her bio, she writes "Black Lives Matter," and has an emoji of the LGBTQ rainbow flag.

fred trump, jr 1966

Fred Trump Jr. (left) signs a contract with Murray Zaret, (right) producer of the Pet Festival and Animal Husbandry Exposition in 1966.New York Post ArchivesGetty Images

She did speak out once about the Trump family.

Mary publicly slammed her extended family about the way Fred Trump Sr.'s estate was handled after his death in 1999.

After Fred III and Mary learned that they would received a far smaller portion of Fred Sr.'s estate than they expected, they filed lawsuits to challenge the outcome, alleging that Donald had pressured Fred Sr. to change his will while Fred Sr. was suffering the effects of dementia.

Her brother, Fred III, had recently had a child with cerebral palsy, who required pricey medical care. The expenses had been covered by a Trump company insurance plan. But after Fred III and Mary challenged Fred Sr.'s will, Robert, Maryanne, and Donald dropped the medical coverage for Fred III's young son in retaliation.

"When [Fred III] sued us, we said, 'Why should we give him medical coverage?'" Donald told the New York Daily Newsin 2000.

Mary also spoke to the Daily News for the article. "Given this family, it would be utterly naive to say it has nothing to do with money. But for both me and my brother, it has much more to do with that our father be recognized," she said. "He existed, he lived, he was their oldest son. And William is my father's grandson. He is as much a part of that family as anybody else. He desperately needs extra care."

The dispute was settled confidentially—but with Mary's new lawsuit against the President and his siblings, it's recently been resurrected. More on that below.

opening of donald trump's taj mahal casino   april 5, 1990

Siblings Donald Trump, Maryanne Trump Barry, and Robert Trump in 1990.
Ron GalellaGetty Images
 

 With her tell-all, she made a big splash.

In June, the Daily Beast broke the story that Mary was set to publish a tell-all about the Trump family. The highly-anticipated Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World’s Most Dangerous Manwas officially released on July 16, 2020. 
 

Courtesy Amazon
Too Much and Never Enough
amazon.com
$28.00
$19.58 (30% off)
 
"Mary L. Trump has the education, insight, and intimate familiarity needed to reveal what makes Donald, and the rest of her clan, tick," reads the description on publisher Simon & Schuster's site, adding that Mary discloses "a nightmare of traumas, destructive relationships, and a tragic combination of neglect and abuse" in the book. Mary also reveals that she was a primary source for the New York Times's landmark investigation into Donald Trump's taxes.
 
On June 21, Donald Trump told Axios that Mary is "not allowed to write a book" because she had signed a non-disclosure agreement in 2001, following the dispute over Fred Sr.'s estate. Trump's statements to Axios confirmed a separate Daily Beast article, which reported Mary's NDA. The youngest of Donald Trump's siblings, Robert, had sued Mary to attempt to stop the book's publication, citing the 2001 NDA. On June 3o, a New York state Supreme Court judge temporarily blocked the publication of Mary's book, ahead of a July 1o hearing for the case. Both Mary's attorney and Simon & Schuster pledged to appeal—and on July 1, an appellate judge reversed the lower court's decision, allowing the publication of the book to move forward.
 

Mary filed a lawsuit against the President and his siblings in September. 

 
The lawsuit, filed in the Supreme Court of Manhattan, begins by stating that "For Donald J. Trump, his sister Maryanne, and their late brother Robert, fraud was not just the family business—it was a way of life," echoing the sentiments of Mary's tell-all.
 
"Mary's father, and their brother, Fred Trump Jr., died in 1981 when Mary was just sixteen years old. Upon his death, Mary inherited valuable minority interests in the family business. Donald, Maryanne, and Robert committed to watch over her interests as fiduciaries. They lied," the suit reads. "Rather than protect Mary's interests, they designed and carried out a complex scheme to siphon funds away from her interests, conceal their grift, and deceive her about the true value of what she had inherited."
 
The suit seeks to recover millions of dollars, which Mary said her relatives worked "together in secret to steal from me" in a statement issued by her lawyer, per the New York Times. She added, "I am bringing this case to hold them accountable and to recover what is rightfully mine."
 
White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany disputed the suit's claims at a press conference on September 24, saying, “The only fraud committed there was Mary Trump recording one of her relatives and she has really discredited herself."
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Who Was Donald Trump's Brother, Robert Trump?

“He was not just my brother, he was my best friend,” said the President of his younger brother, who died August 15 age 71.



ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings

$
0
0

 

 https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies 

 

 
You have my email EH @SidneyPowell1 ??? #Trump#SidneyPowell
 
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:07:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.





---------- Original message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:08:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>




---------- Original message ---------- 
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:11:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.
 
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:07:53 -0400
Subject: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in
Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
To: info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com,
tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com,
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach
<bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, Newsroom
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNv-DoZ-6Dk&feature=emb_title

Patrick Byrne dropping MOABS exclusively on SteelTruth
•Streamed live on Dec 22, 2020
Ann Vandersteel
SteelTruth Weeknights 9pm ET


SteelTruth™

(561) 320-2464
P.O. Box 3074
Tequesta, FL 33469
tips@steeltruth.com
media@steeltruth.com


Press Inquires: press@deepcapture.com or phone (480) 692-9336

At the time much of the content on DeepCapture.com was written, the
Great Financial Crisis of 2008 was either on the verge of happening or
had just occurred. In those days, emotions among this publication’s
contributors were raw and, in an effort to get their warnings noticed
and appropriate blame placed, occasionally hyperbolic language and
shocking imagery were employed. Were we to write these entries today,
a different tone would prevail.

Yet, being a record of a pivotal time in our global economic history,
we’ve decided to leave the rawness unedited, with the proviso that
readers take the context of the creation of certain posts into
account, and that those easily offended re-consider the decision to
read them.

https://radioinfluence.com/2020/12/21/dark-to-light-a-meeting-with-the-president/


Dark To Light: A Meeting With The President
Radio Influence Staff
December 21, 2020
3

Patrick Byrne joins us today for a passionate conversation about his
meeting with the President of the United States. There isn’t a need
for many show notes.

If there was ever an episode of the show you need to share with your
friends and family, this is it.

Follow Tracy Beanz on Twitter, subscribe to her YouTube channel, and
check out her newest venture, UncoverDC.com!

Follow Frank on Twitter, subscribe to his YouTube channel, and follow
his solo podcast, Quite Frankly!
Subscribe to Dark To Light With Frank & Beanz on Apple Podcasts,
Stitcher, TuneIn Radio, Google Play, the iHeartRadio app, and now on
Spotify!


YO Jimmy Fetzer we talked again today after 16 very long years Correct?

https://jamesfetzer.com/

James H. Fetzer
Legal Defense Fund
800 Violet Lane
Oregon, WI   53575
(608) 835-2707
James@JamesFetzer.com


Now say Hey to the Yankee lawyer in Hells Kitchen Mikey Leron who
calls himself  "Lionel" in Youtue and other so called free thinkers
then go figure why I am so pissed off

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_M4lTc5sLw&t=7s&ab_channel=GiuseppeVafanculoNeedtoKnow%3ATheFetzerReport


Need to Know: The Fetzer Report World Premiere
•Streamed live on Sep 3, 2020
Giuseppe Vafanculo Need to Know: The Fetzer Report
The first episode Special Report Features Professor Jim Fetzer along
with commentators Giuseppe Vafanculo from Revolution Radio and Susan
Bradford Author & Muckraking Journalist


http://susanbradford.org/about.php

Susan was lead investigative journalist in the Abramoff investigation,
exposing the machinations of the Deep State within Indian Country and
Bob Mueller's partisan prosecution of Republican superlobbyist Jack
Abramoff and the executives of Enron. She has broken a number of
stories that have been picked up by ABC News and other national media.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/uudM2hYNgSgv/


Jim Fetzer

2211 subscribers

Need to Know Episode 93 (23 December 2020) with Giuseppe Vafanculo and
David Scorpio. Whistleblower shares witnessing traitorous betrayal of
Trump at Friday night White House Meeting. Trump appoints Sidney
Powell Special Counsel, traitors in White House block her entry. Jenna
Ellis calls out traitor Barr. Pence lets down Trump again. More and
more election fraud revealed. Some GOP Congressmen will challenge
electoral fraud on House floor. Trump threatens to veto stimulus bill
unless direct payments upped to $2,000. Drunken Pelosi parties
maskless with no social distancing--traitorous HYPOCRITE! 5 key
elements to scamdemic. Who finally admits most PCR tests reveal
nothing but the common cold. 3,150 MRNA ejection recipients sickened
enough to require hospitalization. 50% of US States plan to deny White
People the MRNA quackccination. Russian scientist who worked on COVID
quackccine stabbed, falls out of window (another suicide). Netanyahu
government collapses, 4th Israeli election in 2 years



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beTDI9WggNY&t=1346s&ab_channel=LionelNation

America the Unrecognizable
9,600 views
Streamed live on Dec 23, 2020
Lionel Nation


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lionel Media <info@lionelmedia.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:16:31 +0000
Subject: The New Lionel Nation Channel
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Remember what it was like to think dangerously? When expression and
thought weren't throttled. When we questioned everything.


** “Censorship reflects society’s lack of confidence in itself. It is
a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.” – Potter Stewart
------------------------------------------------------------
View this email in your browser
(https://us14.campaign-archive.com/?e=4dcb13a46e&u=aaca0d56ddaf02ef4aa46f516&id=04990bcd04)

Here’s the news. I’ve a new channel. A new platform. A new paid
subscription membership
(https://lionelmedia.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) . It’s
not on any social media platform. It’s LionelMedia
(https://lionelmedia.com/) . New and improved. Remember when thinking
was dangerous and unregulated? You know. Freedom of speech. Freedom of
thought, expression, belief. Unfettered, unencumbered, unplugged.
Remember? Sounds too good to be true. But it’s happening. Here
(https://lionelmedia.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) .
Countering the deep state, police state, intel state, shadow
government and ruling class #BigTech fascists. Ahem.

My story. Tuesday morning, 11 September 2001 CE. Redpilled. Big time.
Everything changed for me and I haven’t been the same since. I was in
NYC and couldn’t believe what I was seeing. And then I couldn’t
believe what I was reading and seeing on TV. But the truth was online.
This was before social media and Twatter, Fecesbook and that other
thing. It was Wild West Internet. The theories and hypotheses were
exploding. Many daft, many deranged and many spot-on and deadly
accurate. Perfect. We were called Truthers. Translation: People who
didn’t believe the official account (for a variety of reasons).
Imagine that, derided for wanting the truth. And it was fun and cool
and dangerous. And great.

But wait, there’s more. If you want to question vaccine safety
especially as to kids and you’re not RFK Jr. with Kennedy immunity,
you’re an Anti-Vaxxer and you’re off social media. Remember in 2016
when tough guy wannabe and overrated actor Bobby De Niro dared to
screen “Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe”? Seems that tough guy
Bobby got whacked and backed down. As the NYT reported
(https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/movies/robert-de-niro-pulls-anti-vaccine-documentary-from-tribeca-film-festival.html)
: “Facing a storm of criticism over its plan to show a documentary
about the widely debunked link between vaccines and autism, the
Tribeca Film Festival on Saturday pulled the film from its schedule
next month.” Did you catch that? Widely debunked link between vaccines
and autism. You’d better say it’s debunked or you’ll go the way of
Jenny McCarthy. Who? (Precisely.)

I said there was more. Doubt that UBL was dispatched in a gun battle
in Abbottabad and tossed into the drink à la Luca Brasi with not one
single morgue shot available and question the seemingly endless
passels of ex-Navy SEALs who swear they single-handedly plugged Osama
bin Forgotten, you’re a Deather. Ditto for questioning Saddam’s phone
cam dispatch. Unsure as to Barry O’s provenance (and you can think
Hillary C for that one), you’re a Birther (and a racist). Think that
masks don’t work (as Fauci said repeatedly) other than to steam up
glasses and perpetuate the culture of anonymity, you’re a Masker. (OK,
I made that one up). Bottom line, if you don’t regurgitate the pap,
the story line, you’re on your own. And for most folks they couldn’t
care less. Just let them pose half nude in front of a bathroom mirror
or perseverate the illusion and fantasy of hotness via beauty app and
they’re fine. That’s the way it works. Addict folks to social media
and then demand that they abide by the
rules of insipidity or lose their exhibitionist license. Sorry,
Sparky, not for me.

Then, it all changed. After social media hooked everyone with an
unlimited narcissism stage it changed the rules. Don’t talk at all of
the aforementioned or anything about hydroxychloroquine, stolen
elections, Biden’s profligate son, China, geoengineering, the
conspiracy theory du jour, pro-Trump ideations, “hate speech” and any
of the forbidden phobias or Poof! Off you go. Be gone. Demonetization,
shadow-banning, prohibition in toto, suspension, exceptions, labeling,
cautionary warnings. Systematic destruction of random and erstwhile
protected thought. You will be relegated and exiled in social media
Elba.

I need my own platform. I'm being second-guessed, sanctioned,
penalized, throttled, demonetized. And for what exactly? Especially
now with a spate of ex-Mafia made channels regaling you with lurid
tales of hits and murder and "the life." (Whither omertà?) That’s OK.
But dare to discuss COVID therapeutics and you’re Elvis. Sorry. Look,
there’s nothing wrong with making money from the dissemination of
opinion and analysis. We’re capitalists, after all. (That’s still
legal. Right, AOC?) I want to say what I want and share it with the
world for comments and reactions and reasonable pecuniary support.
It’s what I’ve been doing professionally for 33 years inter alia.
Heritage MSM news platforms are dead. Shock jocks are dinosaurs.
Nothing shocks anymore. Other than the level of censorship. The only
thing available of any informational truth value is citizen/civilian,
alternative and foreign media. And this.

Our mailing address is:

Lionel Media
The Lebron Firm
745 5th Avenue, 5th Floor
New York, New York 10151


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/overstocks_colorful_founder_has_tales_to_tell_about_the_russia_hoax.html

December 23, 2020
Overstock's colorful founder has tales to tell about the Russia hoax
By Andrea Widburg

Patrick Byrne, Overstock's founder, has long suspected that Obama set
up a police intelligence state that's been calling the shots in
American politics since 2015.  On Sunday, he pushed back against those
of Trump's legal advisers demanding surrender.  On Tuesday, he claimed
that Obama had blackmailed Hillary Clinton to own her politically.  If
that's true, what Byrne is saying can upend the American political
scene.

The New Yorker profiled Byrne early in December.  Sheelah Kolhatkar,
who wrote the profile, thinks Byrne is probably as crazy as John
McAfee, with both given over to life-destroying conspiracy theories.
Kolhatkar plays fair, though, and cannot deny his brilliance.

    Former employees describe a memory trick he likes to perform, in
which he studies a deck of cards for a few minutes and then recites
back the order of the cards, one by one. "When he's on, he's smart,
charming, complex, and brilliant," Marc Cohodes, who was once a critic
of Overstock and is now an investor in the company, told me.

While Byrne may be eccentric, he's often right.  He was the first to
realize that investment firms and stock traders were colluding to
drive stock prices down.  He was accused of being paranoid, but the
financial crisis proved he was correct.  Additionally, while Byrne's
tales about his adventures sound like fiction, that doesn't mean they
are:

    David Luban, a professor of law at Georgetown University who has
known Byrne since teaching him as an undergraduate, observed that
improbable things seem to happen to Byrne with remarkable frequency.
"He's a hard man to bet against," Luban said. "So many of his stories
that have seemed utterly incredible turn out to be true."

Byrne's biggest adventure was his relationship with Maria Butina, who
was later convicted of acting as an unregistered Russian foreign
agent.  When she approached him, he was worried enough to report that
fact to the FBI and was surprised when the Fibbies were unconcerned.
Throughout their one-and-a-half-year affair, Byrne kept the FBI
apprised.

Eventually, Byrne decided that the FBI were the baddies, and were
setting up Butina, who was arrested in July 2018:

    By then, Byrne's suspicions about the F.B.I. had crystallized into
a belief that he had been part of a plot by high-ranking members of
the Obama Administration to commit political espionage, in an attempt
to control the next President.

Byrne also claims that the Obama administration planned the Russia
hoax as early as 2015:

    According to the government's version of events, the F.B.I. opened
Crossfire Hurricane, its investigation into possible ties between the
Trump campaign and the Russian government, on July 31, 2016, after it
found out that the Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos had told
an Australian diplomat that he'd heard that Russians had compromising
information about Hillary Clinton. Byrne claims that it all really
started a year earlier, when the F.B.I. became aware of his
relationship with Butina.

We know that the government's account — that they opened the
investigation on July 31, 2016 — is a lie.  A July 28, 2016 Peter
Strzok text to Lisa Page refers to already open counter-intelligence
investigations.  Moreover, Clinton and the DNC had hired Fusion GPS in
April 2016 to investigate Trump's alleged Russian ties.  Byrne thinks
Strzok was an architect of the Russia hoax and used Byrne's
relationship with Butina to further it.

Strzok denies all knowledge of Bryne and Butina.  As a reminder, this is Strzok:

Peter Strzok's creepy smirks freak out Twitter audience

On Sunday, Bryne spoke about a meeting in the Oval Office and claimed
that Trump's legal advisers are betraying him by urging him not to
fight massive election fraud:

Now Byrne has gone on record to say that he was part of a 2015 sting
operation that saw Hillary accept multi-million-dollar bribes from
foreign governments.  Byrne thought the sting was to reveal Hillary's
criminality, only to discover that it was to give Obama a hold over
her when (as everyone assumed) she entered the White House.  You can
see the video clip here in which Byrne explains that Obama had used
the Deep State to set up a blackmail operation.

The big question is whether Byrne is a fabulist, whose utterances we
should ignore — or is he, instead, a brilliant, successful, connected,
often prescient man who's currently a voice in the wilderness and
should be taken very seriously?  I don't have an answer for that, but
his statements seem consistent with what we know about Hillary's
corruption and the Obama Deep State, including the FBI.

Image: Patrick Byrne Interview with Ann Vandersteel.  YouTube screen grab.

Staff
Editor and Publisher    —       Thomas Lifson
Deputy Editor   —       J.R. Dunn
Deputy Editor   —       Drew Belsky
Deputy Editor, Graphics consultant
(i.e., drop Manager, Social Media)      —       Monica Showalter
Deputy Editor   —       Andrea Widburg
Co-founders     —       Richard Baehr, Ed Lasky



Those were your latest videos now enjoy one mine from 2007 published a
full year before the RCMP falsely arrested me after the FBI had
arrested the Yankee Goveno Spitzer in Washington
Obviously (I reloaded It in this YouTube Channel after Google bought
YouTube and maliciously deleted my old faithful account)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVGHg0jlVWk&ab_channel=MaritimeMalaise

RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
1,586 views
Oct 9, 2010
MaritimeMalaise


Below is a true copy of my latest email It was sent today to Sidney
Powell byway of her webpage format The lawyers found below will get
regular email just like I have done with you people (I already called
them all and spoke to some and left messages with the rest)


Perhaps all you lawyers should check my work from years ago and call
me back  ASAP???

https://www.scribd.com/doc/265620671/Cross-Border-Txt


On 12/13/20, Pam Stavropoulos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
> Thank you David!
>
> Really appreciate wide dissemination of these concerns as you clearly
> recognise.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pam S.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Raymond Amos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au>
> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2020 2:16 PM
> To: pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au
> Subject: Contact Form submission from
> http://pamstavropoulos.com.au/contact/
>
> Sender's name: David Raymond Amos
> E-mail: David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com
> Phone: 506 434 8433
>
> Message: ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 23:14:01 -0400
> Subject: ATTN Yanis Varoufakis and Pam Stavropoulos I just tweeted about
> your concerns about Julian Assange and global economy etc
> To: y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
> Cc: motomaniac333
>
> Yanis Varoufakis
> Web Site:
>     https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu
> Email:
>     y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
> Address:
>     Parliament Mansion (Megaro Voulis), GR10021
> Athens / Tel. +30 2103707568 / Fax +30 2103707570.
>
> Check out the attachment for USA litigation over 18 years ago
>
>
> Please notice that the webcasts and transcripts of this hearing went
> missing not long  before the economy crashed in 2008 Find the letter
> fom Spitzer to me on page 12 within the document I offer as
> "Integrity-Yea-Right" and ask yourself why Assaage has never metioned
> me In fact I bet that you folks won't either
>
> https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
>
>  Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
> Mutual Fund Industry
>
> Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003
>
> Witness Panel 1
>
>     Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>     Director - Division of Enforcement
>     Securities and Exchange Commission
>           Cutler - November 20, 2003
>     Mr. Robert Glauber
>     Chairman and CEO
>     National Association of Securities Dealers
>           Glauber - November 20, 2003
>     Eliot Spitzer
>     Attorney General
>     State of New York
>           Spitzer - November 20, 2003
>
>
>
> Yanis Varoufakis
> @yanisvaroufakis
> ·
>
> Law and Disorder: The case of Julian Assange - DiEM25
> The conviction of Julian Assange would signify a new dystopian
> landscape in which all investigative journalism risks prosecution.
> diem25.org
>
> David Raymond Amos
> @DavidRaymondAm1
> ·
> 1h
> Perhaps you and I should have a long talk ASAP?
>
> FYI this old pdf file is the tip of the iceberg of things that Bolton
> and Assange have known about yours truly for many years
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>
> David Raymond Amos
> @DavidRaymondAm1
> ·
> 41m
> The first link I offer in the blog Greece is among the many that
> received hundreds of documents byway of registered US Mail as I
> returned home to run for public office 6 more times while suing the
> Queen
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>
> Notice Assange and Trumps lawyer's email before they became famous?
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>
> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
> first email I ever sent you
> To: David Amos
>
> dear Dave
> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
> find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime
>
> thank you for bearing with me
> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>
> with oceans of joy
> birgitta
>
> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
> not.
>
> Andre Gide
>
> Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
> http://this.is/birgittahttp://joyb.blogspot.com -
> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>
>>>> From: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>>
>>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>>
>>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>>
>>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>>
>>>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> To: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G"Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
>>>> something
>>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>>
>>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>
>>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>>
>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Dear David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>>> office.
>>>>
>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
>>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>>
>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>>
>>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>>> waits attendance.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
>>>> Hafnarstræti 15
>>>> 101 Reykjavík
>>>> Iceland
>>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
>>>> +354-540-3600
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>
> Wednesday, 2 August 2017
>
> Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting
> with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the United Nations,
> This was the pdf file attached to the email found below
>
> https://www.scribd.com/document/332928056/UN-DUDES
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MAY, Theresa"theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32
> 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador
> to the United Nations,
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> If your email is to the Prime Minister, please re-send to the No 10
> website:
> www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>
> http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>
>
> If you are a constituent of the Prime Minister, please re-send to:
> sharkeyj@parliament.uk
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
> recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
> copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
> but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
> encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:16 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki
> Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the
> United Nations,
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
> Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
> "CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management" , news-tips , lionel
> Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
> elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
> oldmaison , andre
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Michael Cohen
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
> called and left a message for you
> To: David Amos
>
> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
> directed to 646-853-0114.
> ________________________________
> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
> electronic signature under applicable law.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
>
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
> Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
> T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
> To: David Amos
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:33 +0000
Subject: RE: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000
Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Original message ----------
From: "B English (MIN)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:29 +0000
Subject: Automated response from the office of Hon Bill English
To: David Amos

Thank you for your email to the Prime Minister.

This is an automated response.

Please be assured that any matters you raise in your email will be
noted; however, not all messages will receive an individual response.

Yours sincerely
The Office of the Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: PmInvites
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:50 +0000
Subject: PM Invites
To: David Amos

Thank you for your invitation/meeting request to the Prime Minister,
the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP.
Your invitation will be considered in light of the Prime Minister's
existing commitments.
We will be in touch with you as soon as possible to formally advise
the progress of your invitation/meeting request.

Yours sincerely

Prime Minister's Office

______________________________________________________________________

IMPORTANT: This message, and any attachments to it, contains information
that is confidential and may also be the subject of legal professional or
other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
must not review, copy, disseminate or disclose its contents to any other
party or take action in reliance of any material contained within it. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return email informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of the
message from your computer system.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Turnbull, Malcolm (MP)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President
Donald J. Trump I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen
(646-853-0114) Why does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

***Please be advised that this email address is no longer in use***

Thank you for taking the time to write to me. Feedback from the people
we represent is always extremely valuable for members of parliament,
and especially valuable to me as Prime Minister.

However as you can imagine I receive a very large, sometimes
dauntingly large, amount of correspondence and it is important that we
do everything we can to respond to it as quickly and effectively as
possible.

So to help us best direct your enquiry and respond to it, please
complete this contact form. If you have written a detailed message in
your email, just cut and paste it into the contact form and complete
the details requested.

If you would like to invite me or Lucy to an event, please forward the
invitation to pminvites@pmc.gov.au.

If you are a Wentworth constituent, please make us aware of this and
my electorate office team in Edgecliff will be in touch.

Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull
Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
"CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management" , news-tips , lionel
Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
oldmaison , andre


> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
> andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Merci ,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>>  Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I.                    Introduction
>>>
>>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III.               Issue
>>>
>>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV.              Analysis
>>>
>>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V.                 Conclusion
>>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>

SIDNEY POWELL
Sidney Powell, P.C.
2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 300
Dallas, Texas 75219
(517) 763-7499
sidney@federalappeals.com



HOWARD KLEINHENDLER
Counsel of Record
Howard Kleinhendler Esquire
369 Lexington Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(917) 793-1188
howard@kleinhendler.com


L. LIN WOOD
L. LIN WOOD, P.C.
P.O. Box 52584
Atlanta, GA 30305-0584
(404) 891-1402
lwood@fightback.law

Of Counsel
JULIA Z. HALLER
BRANDON JOHNSON
EMILY P. NEWMAN


SIDNEY POWELL
STEFANIE LAMBERT JUNTTILA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Petitioners
500 Griswold Street, Suite 2340
Detroit, MI 48226
(248) 270-6689
attorneystefanielambert@gmail.com

SCOTT R. ELDRIDGE
Attorney at Law
Miller, Canfield,
One Michigan Avenue
Suite 900
Lansing, MI 48933-1609
517-483-4918
Email: eldridge@millercanfield.com

DANIEL M. SHARE
EUGENE DRIKER
STEPHEN E. GLAZEK
Attorney at Law
Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLC
333 West Fort Street; 12th Floor
Detroit, MI 48226
313-965-9725
Email: dshare@bsdd.com

EZRA D. ROSENBERG
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
1500 K Street, NW; Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
202-662-8345
Email: erosenberg@lawyerscommittee.org

JON GREENBAUM
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
District Of Columbia
1500 K Street NW
Ste 9th Floor
Washington, DC 20005
202-662-8315
Email: jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org

ERIK A. GRILL
HEATHER S. MEINGAST
Michigan Department of Attorney General
Civil Litigation, Employment & Elections Division
PO Box 30736
Lansing, MI 48909
517-335-7659
Email: grille@michigan.gov

DARRYL BRESSACK
DAVID H. FINK and NATHAN J. FINK
Attorneys as Law
38500 Woodward Avenue; Suite 350
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
248-971-2500
Email: dbressack@finkbressack.com

ANDREW A. PATERSON, JR.
Attorney at Law
46350 Grand River Ave.
Novi, MI 48374
248 568-9712
Email: aap43@hotmail.com

MARY ELLEN GUREWITZ
Attorney at Law
Cummings & Cummings Law PLLC
423 North Main Street; Suite 200
Royal Oak, MI 48067
313-204-6979
Email: megurewitz@gmail.com

RE Little Grey Cells loves your comment Trust that the CBC, the RCMP and Frank Magazine et al will hate this email

$
0
0

 Youtube Logo

 

PAUL P - A PAIR OF NUKNUUKS, AND ALL KIND OF QUESTIONS | Little Grey Cells

David Amos
https://www.ottawalife.com/article/investigative-reporter-and-author-paul-palango-says-rcmp-destroyed-evidence-in-nova-scotia-shootings"The document first was sent anonymously to Little Grey Cells, aYou Tube channel, which operates out of Alberta. The show’s host, Seamus Gorman, has been discussing it for the past few days in his broadcasts as part of a group called The Discord. It is comprised of 380 citizen investigators who have banded together since the massacre to dig up information."
Little Grey Cells loves your comment


Youtube Logo


Little Grey Cells loves your comment

 


 

PAUL P ON RICK HOW DEC 24 & MERRY CHRISTMAS

1,009 views
Streamed live on Dec 24, 2020
2.76K subscribers
Please email us any tips: nsinvestigators@gmail.com 
 
 
Our team: 
Tara Please subscribe to Tara's channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh9D... 
 
Steve L-TT Please subscribe to his channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCtDB... 
 
 
 JMSO Please subscribe to Adrian's channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UChq9... 
 
 
Rage in the Kage Please sub to Kage's channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCP03... 
 
Oh Dear Please subscribe to her channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmUI... A
 
 
ND OF COURSE, ALL OF THE HUGE SUPPORT OF ALL OF YOU!!!! 
 
THANKS SO MUCH TO THE DISCORD!!! 
 
WITHOUT ALL OF YOU, THIS WOULD NOT BE POSSIBLE :) 
 
God bless!!!! 
 
Seamus
 
 
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 08:22:44 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Automatic reply: RE Little Grey Cells loves your comment
Trust that the CBC, the RCMP and Frank Magazine et al will hate this
email
To: nsinvestigators@gmail.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 12:21:40 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Little Grey Cells loves your comment
Trust that the CBC, the RCMP and Frank Magazine et al will hate this
email
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>



---------- Original message ----------
From: "McCulloch, Sandra"<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 12:22:02 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Little Grey Cells loves your comment
Trust that the CBC, the RCMP and Frank Magazine et al will hate this
email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.  I will be away from the office for the much
of the holidays, between December 21st and January 4th.  I will be
online and checking my email periodically, and will reply to your
message as soon as I can.  Please contact 902.897.2000 if you require
a more urgent response.


---------- Original message ----------
From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 12:21:40 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : RE Little Grey Cells loves your comment
Trust that the CBC, the RCMP and Frank Magazine et al will hate this
email
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
lalanthier@hotmail.com

Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca

Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
lalanthier@hotmail.com

To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca

Thank you,

Merci ,


---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 12:21:40 +0000
Subject: RE: RE Little Grey Cells loves your comment Trust that the
CBC, the RCMP and Frank Magazine et al will hate this email
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 08:21:24 -0400
Subject: RE Little Grey Cells loves your comment Trust that the CBC,
the RCMP and Frank Magazine et al will hate this email
To: nsinvestigators@gmail.com, tim@halifaxexaminer.ca,
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
prmibullrun@gmail.com, "Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
"Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, "elizabeth.mcmillan"
<elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca>, "lisa.mayor"<lisa.mayor@cbc.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, andrew@frankmagazine.ca,
"justmin@gov.ns.ca"<justmin@gov.ns.ca>, andrewjdouglas@gmail.com,
patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Mad Ape
<chiefape@gmail.com>, "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, Jon Blanchard
<dexterdyne@gmail.com>, aparish@burchells.ca, "greg.church"
<greg.church@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, eps@edmontonpolice.ca, calgarypolice
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, Ob Wor <obscene.works@gmail.com>, msegal
<msegal@murraysegal.com>, David Fraser
<david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>, jpink <jpink@pinklarkin.com>,
"premier@gov.ns.ca"<premier@gov.ns.ca>, Glen Canning
<grcanning@gmail.com>, michael@frankmagazine.ca,
blake@frankmagazine.ca, comment@contrarian.ca, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Glen Muise
<glenmuise1000@gmail.com>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
greg.horton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca,
smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB
<JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com,
"Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, news919 <news919@rogers.com>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: YouTube <noreply@youtube.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 21:05:41 -0800
Subject: Little Grey Cells loves your comment
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Little Grey Cells loves your comment
Little Grey Cells loves your comment on PAUL P - A PAIR OF NUKNUUKS, AND
ALL KIND OF QUESTIONS
David Amos
Comment: Perhaps we should talk
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPVAL1E3MGY&feature=em-comments
Comment URL:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPVAL1E3MGY&lc=z23nvfg5cqj3e5ibn04t1aokggxreoqrmumalllsrypubk0h00410&feature=em-comments
Unsubscribe:
http://www.youtube.com/email_unsubscribe?uid=HI9BSxLVOnJkvYTVZlxvbA&action_unsubscribe=vATw3wKyg8i2Q6iEO4MZoP2PdfJ8MTYwOTM5MTE0MUAxNjA5MzkxMTQx&feature=em-comments





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 12:44:43 -0300
Subject: Yo Premier McNeil Trust that my emails to the nasty bastards
within Frank magazine are not SPAM Nor was the Hard Copy I sent to the
Attorney General and the RCMP
To: andrew@frankmagazine.ca, "justmin@gov.ns.ca"<justmin@gov.ns.ca>,
andrewjdouglas@gmail.com, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>,
Barry Winters <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, Mad Ape <chiefape@gmail.com>,
"john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, Jon Blanchard
<dexterdyne@gmail.com>, aparish@burchells.ca, "greg.church"
<greg.church@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, eps@edmontonpolice.ca, calgarypolice
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, Ob Wor <obscene.works@gmail.com>, msegal
<msegal@murraysegal.com>, David Fraser
<david.fraser@mcinnescooper.com>, jpink <jpink@pinklarkin.com>,
"premier@gov.ns.ca"<premier@gov.ns.ca>, "peter.mackay"
<peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>, "steven.blaney"
<steven.blaney@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Glen Muise
<glenmuise1000@gmail.com>, MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
"justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "gilles.moreau"<gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles. Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
greg.horton@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Glen Canning
<grcanning@gmail.com>, michael@frankmagazine.ca,
blake@frankmagazine.ca, comment@contrarian.ca

No need for me to be redundant your evil buddies Mr Baconfat and the
MadShangi have said enough this weekend EH Andy Baby?

https://twitter.com/davidrayamos/status/412743586460237824

*Janice Purdy** ‏@purdyjan * 16 Dec 2013
<https://twitter.com/purdyjan/status/412675906805563392> @*Frank_Mag*
<https://twitter.com/Frank_Mag> You need bullying sensitivity training so
you can stop running your mouth off about things of which you know shit-all
1 retweet  2 favorites

*Peter Henderson* ‏@*Henderburn* <https://twitter.com/Henderburn> 16 Dec
2013 <https://twitter.com/Henderburn/status/412676896220909568>
@*purdyjan* <https://twitter.com/purdyjan> @*Frank_Mag*
<https://twitter.com/Frank_Mag> wait, is that what sensitivity training
teaches you? 0 retweets  0 favorites
*Frank Magazine* ‏@*Frank_Mag* <https://twitter.com/Frank_Mag> 16 Dec 2013
<https://twitter.com/Frank_Mag/status/412677686964666368>
@*Henderburn* <https://twitter.com/Henderburn> @*purdyjan*
<https://twitter.com/purdyjan> does bullying sensitivity training make one
a kinder, gentler, but more effective bully?
1 retweet  1 favorite

*The Political Petard* ‏@*PoliticalPetard*
<https://twitter.com/PoliticalPetard> 16 Dec 2013
<https://twitter.com/PoliticalPetard/status/412690969448812544> @*Frank_Mag*
<https://twitter.com/Frank_Mag> @*Henderburn*
<https://twitter.com/Henderburn> @*purdyjan* <https://twitter.com/purdyjan>
Bullshit Sensitivity training is exactly that, thin skinned people/Adult
need to learn to suck it up.
0 retweets  0 favorites

*Peter Henderson* ‏@*Henderburn* <https://twitter.com/Henderburn> 16 Dec
2013 <https://twitter.com/Henderburn/status/412720372141031424>
@*RayMcLennan1* <https://twitter.com/RayMcLennan1> @*Frank_Mag*
<https://twitter.com/Frank_Mag> @*purdyjan* <https://twitter.com/purdyjan>
you seem like somebody who would need it
0 retweets  0 favorites

*The Political Petard* ‏@*PoliticalPetard*
<https://twitter.com/PoliticalPetard> 16 Dec 2013
<https://twitter.com/PoliticalPetard/status/412728465553514496> @
*Henderburn* <https://twitter.com/Henderburn> @*Frank_Mag*
<https://twitter.com/Frank_Mag> @*purdyjan* <https://twitter.com/purdyjan>
I am Sorry but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a
tinkers damn!
0 retweets  0 favorites
*David Raymond Amos*‏@*DavidRayAmos* <https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos> 16
Dec 2013 <https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/status/412743586460237824>

@*raymclennan1* <https://twitter.com/RayMcLennan1> @*frank_mag*
<https://twitter.com/Frank_Mag> @*henderburn*
<https://twitter.com/Henderburn> @*purdyjan* <https://twitter.com/purdyjan>
@*DavidRayAmos* <https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos> Perhaps you should learn
to http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/12/round-
three-easily-proves-that-premier.html
Monday, 9 December 2013
  Round Three easily proves that Premier McNeil and the dudes in Frank
Magazine have received and acknowledged my emails in the past The question
is what did Nova Scotia's Justice Minister's do with the Hard Copy sent by
REGISTERED US Mail in 2005?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Sun, May 24, 2015 at 1:17 AM
Subject: Automatic reply: [PROBABLE-SPAM] Re: Tarrah says Glen has not been
truthful when talking to media
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil.

This is an automatic confirmation your email has been received.

Warmest Regards,

Premier's Correspondence Unit




https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/05/24/twenty-e-mails-last-night-from-david-amos/


Twenty E Mails Last Night From David Amos
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/> on May 24,
2015

I and hundreds of others it seems received about twenty mass e-mailings
from convicted and registered pedophile David Raymond Amos of Halifax last
night. These e-mails are totally unsolicited, completely unwanted, poorly
written, go on for ever and ever, and are… spam. Damn, that’s a lot of
spam! There is nothing David Raymond Amos has to say or could say to anyone
the planet… that anyone would want to hear. David Raymond Amos is the
product of incestuous sexual congress betwixt his mother and  her brother a
German Shepherd Dog.

Hey David! If you, little Glenford Canning, the boys at Frank Magazine, and
anonymous don’t like this humble blog…don’t read it!

Oh dear, call me “Maxwell” lol lol lol

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/05/24/leah-parsons-says/
Leah Parsons Says!
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/> on May 24,
2015

Killer “parent” and entrepreneur Leah Parsons says ! “My daughter will be
remembered for what she stood for!” That’s a big negatory Leah baby! Retaeh
Parsons will be known for having a really stupid name, (Heather in
dyslexic) and for being a thirteen year-old slut that would do anything or
fuck anyone to “sit at the cool-kids table at school.” Rehtaeh Parsons will
be remembered for killing herself because she had to rid herself of two
disinterested, abusive, and now self-promoting “parents.”

The world, Canada and Maritime kanada is a better place with the
self-inflicted demise of little Rehtaeh Parsons. There’s one less hooker on
the streets of Halifax, there’s one less uneducated bimbo with four kids on
the welfare rolls. One less scum from  maritime kanada with her hand in our
pockets.

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/05/24/glenford-cannings-rape-culture/
Glenford Canning’s “Rape Culture!”
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/> on May 24,
2015

Rehateh Parsons was her daddy’s “very special angel!” Long before what Leah
Parsons called”that fateful party,” Glenford Canning would in the dark of
night do what the early Old Testiment Prophets referred to as “wash her
feet,” and or “lie with,” his daughter Rehtaeh Parsons. By the time Rehateh
Parsons was a prepubescent thirteen years old she was already emotionally
and intellectually damaged if not destroyed by Glenford Canning. Rehtaeh
Parsons at thirteen was “acting out,” lying to her entirely disinterested
“parents,” attending regularly sex parties and abusing both alcohol and
recreational drugs. “That fateful party” was NOT little Rehteah’s “first
rodeo” but only the culmination of a very large number drunken incidences
of sexual congress with a multiplicity of  partners… all them completely
consensual.

Rehtaeh Parsons extinguished her worthless life to rid herself of her
disinterested “mother” and abusive “father. Her “life” was ended by her
“father” before it had an opportunity to begin.

If there were any justice in this world and there isn’t, Leah Parsons  and
Glenford Canning would be dead.

Ping Back that Glen

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/05/22/justice-for-child-abusers-glenford-canning-and-david-amos/
Justice for Child Abusers Glenford Canning, and David Amos
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/> on May 22,
2015

What’s there not to love?

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/01/18/the-canning-parsons-crime-syndicate/
The Canning / Parsons Crime Syndicate!
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/> on January
18, 2015

The sordid, tragic, criminally negligent, and culpable story of little
Rehtaeh Parsons is finally over! The contrived self-serving false
allegations, lies and cries of rape were just that;  contrived,
self-serving false allegations, lies and cries of rape. A couple of day’s
ago the last principle or former teenage-boy was adjudicated, judged and
sentenced in a Halifax “kangaroo court,” for doing what all teenagers did
all those years ago, sending risqué pictures of each other on their cell
phones. Two teenage boys, and what began as a couple of teenage-girls were
tossing back “vodka shots.” Notwithstanding the begging and protestations
of the girl, Rehtaeh who had gone to the party with, for Rehtaeh not to
fuck her boyfriend, Rehateh climbed the stairs to the bedroom with two
young boys, including her friend’s paramour to fuck their brains out.

Last evening I posted two news pieces from the National Post, and Frank
Magazine on this Blog, about this sordid hoax, and  elaborate confidence
scheme. Longstanding, and well-known cyber-troll and criminal stalker of
women David Amos of Halifax sent literally thousands of unsolicited, and
spam e mails to thousands of “victims” last evening, complaining about this
Blog and its posts from the National Post, and Frank Magazine were
“cyber-stalking Glenford Canning!” That I was perpetrating salacious, and
slanderous libel upon,  and “cyber-stalking” poor  Glenford Canning by
posting two pieces from the national media.

Canada, and Canadians have finally learned the truth about Rehtaeh Parsons,
her fictious  rape, the true circumstances regarding her suicide, the
character of her “killer parents” Glen Canning and Leah Parsons, but more
importantly the entire elaborate hoax and con job this entire sordid tale
became.

Back to what Leah Parsons called “that fateful party,” Rehtaeh Parsons goes
up the stairs to the bedroom with two boys, one of them her best friend’s
boyfriend. Rehtaeh is described to be naked from the waist down, leaning
over a window, and they have been screwing for a while. Suddenly Rehtaeh
says she’s going to be sick, and one of the two boys places her in range of
the window so she wouldn’t spew on the floor.  Rehteah  then goes to the
bathroom, and whilst she was there, the two teenage-boys shared a smoke by
the window. When Rehtaeh returns, she tells the boys she wants to continue
with the “sexual athletics,” and so this entirely consensual sex continues.
Teenagers “tweet,” Face Book, share, everything, no one’s High School years
aren’t without significant emotional trauma. Little Rehtaeh was more than
OK, with that evening’s sexual athletics for over a week…until the pictures
appeared on or in cyber-space.

Police witness statements relate Rehtaeh telling “friends” she didn’t want
to be perceived as a “slut,” when she first saw the photos in cyber-space,
and at that point Rehtaeh, Leah, and Glenford decided one of Rehtaeh’s
numerous consensual sexual adventures was now a  ” vicious  gang rape ” by
four boys. As Halifax Police and the RCMP conducted two over year-long
investigations, there wasn’t a scintilla of evidence of rape, by four boys,
two boys or any boys. During two police investigations the ” Canning /
Parsons Crime Syndicate” engaged hacker collective anonymous to “out” boys
that weren’t involved, and one boy that wasn’t even at there.  Glen Canning
had anonymous even hack the  computer accounts of  the Father of one the
boys investigated. Leah Parsons led lynch mobs through the streets of
Halifax tearing handbills off posts, that told Haligonians to await the
results of the police investigations. Leah Parsons whined, cried, and lied
to the media how she was frightened, and threatened that handbills were
posted saying…”innocent until proven guilty.” The Rehteah Parsons, Leah
Parsons, /  Glenford Canning crime family bullied, threatened, stalked, and
harassed innocent boys, and their parents. The Parsons / Canning crime
family vilified, libeled, and propagandizing against the boys and their
family’s, the Parsons / Canning criminals knew were innocent… because there
was never a rape. Two police investigations found no evidence of a rape or
sexual assault because their wasn’t any.

Even at the time “of that fateful party,” the Parsons / Canning marriage
was problematic, it was a dysfunctional family, a broken home, the parents
were disinterested, and abusive. While the Parsons / Canning crime family
were conducting a social media circus, lynch mob, and con, seventeen
year-old Rehtaeh had stopped attending school, became  addicted to  drugs,
and was co-habitating with a twenty-three year-old man.  On April 4 2013
Rehtaeh after a quarrel with her adult significant other, went home and
hanged herself.  The ever opportunistic, and looking to make a buck Leah
Parsons and Glenford Canning immediately called every and all media outlets
to remonstrate loudly Rehtaeh’s suicide was the result of the “four boys”
that “viciously gang raped” her. The problem was….there was no rape. The
Parsons / Canning crime syndicate now had tragically lost one of its
members. But Glenford and Leah simply blamed The Crown, the Halifax police,
the Nova Scotia government, the “culture of rape in Canada,” The Halifax
School Board, the four “little bastards” that “viciously gang raped” her,
and now the little bastards who took those action photos, of Rehtaeh in
consensual action. Since Rehtaeh had “shrugged off this mortal
coil,” the Parsons / Canning crime syndicate has made a bundle. Clearly
Rehtaeh Parsons was screwed up long before  ” that fateful party”. Little
Rehtaeh’s  “parents ” gained far more from her death than ever when she was
alive .

They say “you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can’t
fool all the people all the time.” The Glenford Canning / Leah Parsons
crime organization has outlived its welcome in Halifax according to Frank
Magazine. Frank Magazine suggested that  “was past time for Glen Canning to
get a real job.” Glen Canning recently posted the genitalia of a college
professor, on twitter in a fit of righteous altruistic rage. When the last
boy was sentenced a couple of days ago, the judge lectured both the boy
being sentenced and Glen Canning for taking pictures of a sexual nature.
Glen Canning knew it and Halifax’s media knew it.

No one screwed up the Rehtaeh Parsons’ case or investigation. Its past time
for the Canning / Parsons crime syndicate to consider simply to shut the
fuck up…you’re liars!

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/01/18/glenford-canning-a-killer-dad/
Glenford Canning…”A Killer Dad!”
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/> on January
18, 2015

Haligonians are starting to wish that Glenford and Leah were long gone.

by Parker on 8 January 2015 at 23:31 · Email a comment
<comment@contrarian.ca> · Report a tpyo <typo@contrarian.ca>

[image: MSVU]

A legal lynching took place Thursday at the hands of the media, Glen
Canning, and the Mount Saint Vincent University administration. They and we
should all feel a bit dirty.

Michael Kydd, a part-time instructor at Mount Saint Vincent University,
was suspended, then resigned, after he was found to have had a brief sexual
relationship with a student.

The student was 38 years old, Kydd is 40. The course was a distance
education offering, the sex consensual. The woman says they were both going
through a difficult patch—Kydd was separated from his wife and seeking a
divorce—when they found comfort in each other’s arms. A total of two
liaisons, a bit of sexting, and some shared explicit photos.

On one occasion, Kydd prorated a grade for the woman, as he had for other
students, when a medical emergency prevented her from attending an exam.

A few weeks ago, the unnamed woman somehow began meeting with Canning, the
crusading father of the late Rehtaeh Parsons, and shortly after, she
reported the affair to the school administration. Yesterday Canning tweeted
a bowdlerized photo of the man’s penis along with some disapproving text.

I’ll pause for a moment while you absorb that.

When teenaged boys texted an explicit photo of Rehtaeh, Canning
understandably demanded their hides. Throughout the process leading to the
boys’ sentencing, he was constantly on the news and in social media,
condemning their actions and the bullying it engendered.

He showed no such concern for Kydd’s children, or the families
involved, when he shared an explicit photo without consent yesterday—only
an impulse to indulge in slut-shaming of his own. When his lewd display
touched off a firestorm on Twitter, he deleted the tweet but remained
unrepentant.

The Mount suspended Kydd, and gratuitously reassured students the accused
instructor was “not currently in the classroom”—gotta keep up the fantasy
he posed some kind of  menace, don’t you know. President Ramona Lumpkin
issued a statement affirming the university’s sensitivity to “protecting
and supporting the student who has made this allegation and… providing
whatever supports needed.”

Like a backbone, maybe?

The only backbone in evidence belonged to Kydd, who summoned reporters to
his lawyer’s office, where he read a statement acknowledging his actions
and announced he had resigned from his part-time teaching job.

“I did not want to compound my mistake—and this is my mistake—by failing to
come forward and take responsibility,” he said. “I expect my career to be
ruined.”

Seriously? Of all the characters in this tawdry operetta—the jilted ex-lover,
the avenging hypocrite,  the prissy president—Kydd is the only one I’d
trust with work, children, or the truth. He’s the only one who owned up,
spoke plain words, shouldered responsibility.

This is but the latest example of what happens when authorities substitute
zero tolerance for considered judgment.

I’d say the Merit Contractors Association of Nova Scotia, where Kydd serves
as president, is fortunate to have a person of his character. I
suspect they won’t be stampeded into joining the lynch mob.

One last thing: Will this episode finally persuade the Halifax media to
exercise critical judgment and stop treating Canning as a hero whose every
mean-spirited utterance is regarded as received truth?

<!–

–>

Filed under: That’s life <http://contrarian.ca/category/thats-life/> ·

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/glen-canning-pornographer/
Glen Canning Pornographer!
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/> on January
16, 2015

Get this dick out of here”: has Glen Canning fallen out of love with the
media?
by Blake Hunsley
[image: "Get this dick out of here": has Glen Canning fallen out of love
with the media?]
<http://www.frankmagazine.ca/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/glen%20and%20co.jpg>

Something very strange happened at the hearing held today to sentence the
man who shared the infamously ‘intimate’ photo of Rehtaeh Parsons. When the
hearing ended and the assembled representatives of the local press held out
their cameras and microphones to receive Glen Canning’s latest
pronouncements, he walked right past them. Briskly too, without a word or a
glance. I’m surprised there wasn’t more of an audible gasp in the room.

As his appearances on virtually every network and newspaper cover across
this nation and beyond have shown again and again, Glen’s not one to shrink
from publicity. So why today, on such an important day, would he avoid the
press entirely? Well it likely has to do with an uncomfortable question he
was asked on his way in to court earlier in the day. After a slightly
awkward introduction (a hand was extended in friendship, it was not
reciprocated), Frank editor Andrew  Douglas asked Glen for a comment on his
recent unauthorized sharing of an ‘intimate image’ (see dick pic) belonging
to former MSVU sex-ed business instructor Michael Kydd. “Today’s about my
daughter,” Canning replied. When pressed further, Canning’s wife Krista
attempted to intervene, but Glen reminded us all that he can (and
frequently does) speak for himself. “Go fuck yourself,” he said, before
demanding that another woman in his entourage “Get that dick away from me.”

If Glen was tired of hearing about his poorly thought out photo sharing
before the hearing, he must have been absolutely exhausted after listening
to the sentencing judge. “You are responsible for sharing that photo,” the
judge said, theoretically to the accused. “Every time the image is viewed,
the person depicted is victimized again and again.” To his credit, Glen did
not begin to squirm visibly as the judge hammered home the dire
consequences of sharing compromising photos without permission.

“Intimate images cannot be shared without consent under any circumstances,”
the judge said, “An adult knows this and would not be excused for doing so.”

Talk about awkward. The judge couldn’t have been any clearer if he’d come
down from his lofty perch, grabbed Glen Canning by the shoulders, and
slowly and patiently pronounced every word while staring him straight in
the face. Small wonder Mr. Canning suddenly developed an aversion to
publicity.

But the timing of his new-found media shyness couldn’t be more
disappointing. You see, Michael Kydd’s dick pic isn’t the only ‘intimate
image’ I’d like to ask Glen Canning about. I’d also like to ask him about
the dozen very intimate pictures featured on his Model Mayhem
<http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/119777/viewall> photography portfolio.

While these photos, taken by amateur photographer Glen, were all presumably
shared with the consent of their  subjects, there’s something terribly
off-putting about a grieving father who crusades against the exploitation
of young women posting photos of young girls that would make an American
Apparel marketing agent blush.

<http://photos.modelmayhem.com/photos/060331/05/442d1554d4acb.jpg>

That some of the women appear to be minors is even more disturbing. There
may be only partial nudity pictured, but the photos are all very sexual,
and far from what you might expect to see posted by the father of a girl
made famous after being exploited in photos shared online.

After browsing through Glen’s collection of young nubiles, clicking on the
link titled “Glen Canning Multimedia Productions” takes you to a website
that is dominated by the story of Rehtaeh, and her father’s efforts to make
the internet a safer place for young women. ‘Help prevent sexual
exploitation’ is the central theme of the second site. ‘Check out these
fine, young hotties’ seems to be the main message of the first. The
transition is jarring, to say the least.

If Glen Canning can’t see the apparent conflict between these two facets of
his online presence, then I have to seriously question his judgement. Just
like I questioned it when he published Michael Kydd’s dick pic. Or when he
championed laws that eroded our privacy. Or when he sent Anonymous to
chastise his online critics. Or when he took a revisionist history approach
to recounting his daughter’s tragically short life. Or…

The list goes on, and week by week it grows longer. Glen apparently remains
unrepentant over the dick pic sharing incident.

Messages left with Glen questioning his thoughts on the judge’s statements,
and the contents of his Model Mayhem account, have not been returned.

blake@frankmagazine.ca

https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/03/26/frank-magazines-got-glen-canning-dead-to-rights/
Frank Magazine’s Got Glen Canning “Dead to Rights.”
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/> on March 26,
2015

Glen Canning and Leah Parsons were killer parents. Rehaeh Parsons killed
herself to rid herself of her abusive “parents.”

Halifax’s Frank Magazine has got their number!
Is Rehtaeh’s dad a secret cyberbully?
by Andrew Douglas

There are more indications that *Glen Canning* has become the very thing
he’s vowed to eradicate.

It appears that Glen, under cover of anonymity, has taken to calling his
online critics down to the lowest, including but not limited to inviting
one individual to kindly “shoot yourself”.

The contrast between those words – uttered on the news discussion
website *novascotialive.com
<http://novascotialive.com>* – and Glen’s countless public statements on
the evils of cyberbullying, at conferences and in classrooms across the
continent, couldn’t be more stark.

When I presented Glen with several comments made under the username *Anne P*,
he denied making the remarks, and questioned how I could prove he did. But
he wasn’t interested in any answers. It was a brief conversation,
punctuated with several angry curse words. And then, following an
invitation to “have a nice day, dick,” he hung up on me.



This isn’t the first time Glen’s online behaviour has been called into
question. In *January,* he was roundly criticized
<http://www.frankmagazine.ca/node/3524> for tweeting an edited picture of *Mike
**Kydd*‘s penis, after the adult student with whom he had an affair ran to
Glen for counsel, for whatever reason. Later, Glen withstood another round
of denunciation when *Frank* reporter *Blake Hunsley* revealed that Glen’s
hobbies include taking photographs of young-looking models “that would make
an *American Apparel* marketing agent blush
<http://www.frankmagazine.ca/node/3531>“.

Glen Canning’s knack for finding his way into the news cycle on a
semi-daily basis, nearly two years after the tragic death of his
daughter, *Rehtaeh
Parsons*, has long been commented upon in an increasingly wide array of
circles. Much like impassable sidewalks in *Halifax* this winter, Glen
Canning has become, quite simply, an unavoidable fact of life.

Just this month, the local news media breathlessly reported that Glen
traveled to *New York* to address the *United Nations* — about the scourge
of cyberbullying, of course. And there’s the Rehtaeh documentary, which we
also learned recently will premiere at the *Hot Docs* film festival next
month. No doubt, Glen will be photographed on the red carpet in
*Toronto *sporting
a scarf and black t-shirt, along with all the other artsy folk.

After a few days without any news from Glen, I took to the Frank Magazine
*Twitter* account on *March 19* to question whether he made it through the
storm alright. Unbeknownst to me at the time, just minutes after that tweet
went up, a conversation thread criticizing Frank Magazine and its staff
appeared on Nova Scotia Live. A few days later, the thread was brought to
my attention via a newly-minted Twitter account, *@Terminal_Zen*, and its
owner, Anne P. The Twitter account was initially established to give a
wider audience to the N.S. Live discussion thread – also begun by somebody
called Anne P. – and the Twitter account holder proceeded to blame Frank
and its staff for, among other things, perpetuating rape culture, being
anti-woman and homophobic, and being “gutless assholes”.

Curious about this mysterious Anne P., I took to Nova Scotia Live to find
out what else she’s been saying. As far as I could tell, the account was
created in mid-*March*. And when she wasn’t criticizing Frank – which is
fair enough, hey, it’s a free country – she spent the rest of her time
defending Glen Canning from criticism on several fronts. About the Mike
Kydd incident, and, most notably, about a recent arrest made by military
police over online comments made on a *DND* computer. As you probably know,
the comments had to do with the Rehtaeh Parsons case, and the man arrested
turned out to be the father of one of Rehtaeh’s tormentors. But since the
military case involves a potential code of conduct violation and is not a
criminal matter at all, the arrest has been widely criticized, most notably
in a *March 4* *National Post* editorial that questions why an arrest,
search warrants, and the involvement of military police was necessary at
all.

On the Nova Scotia Live discussion board, Anne P shows a laser-like focus
on the details of the case, and she’s pissed:

“Canning made a complaint to the military police in *October*. A complaint.
One. Related to the words said on his web site. He made it to the military
police in Halifax,” she blusters.

“Not plural idiot. And not about *Wikipedia*. So fuck off. It’s in the
online stories if you can read shithead”.

Over on the National Post website comment section, a poster named
*TerminalZen*, while mounting another spirited defense of Glen, has words
with a fellow by the name of *Philip Rose*. I should note here that last
year Glen Canning wrote a detailed piece on his website, accusing the very
same Philip Rose of cyberbullying *Amanda Todd,* the *B.C.* teenager that
killed herself in *2012*. In that piece, Glen also claimed that Philip Rose
had reported him to police for being a pedophile.

In their exchange on the National Post website, “TerminalZen” accuses
Philip of being one of Amanda Todd’s cyberbullys. And then he tells Philip
that “the police always ignore you. Not that you’ve ever gone to them”.
Could that be an allusion to Glen’s belief that Philip reported him to
the *Canadian
Centre for Child Protection*, I wonder?

And then there’s Anne P.’s derisive comment: “You’ve never served, have
you?”

Glen, as you might know, is retired military.

It’s certainly beginning to look like Terminal Zen and Anne P, in all their
iterations, serve as pseudonyms to mask Glen Canning. Even moreso when you
consider that the Twitter account is using a photograph of a cyberbullied
gay teenager, *Adam Roberts*, whose cause Glen has championed on his
personal website. A *Google* reverse image search for the photo –
essentially, a way to find out where else on the web the photograph has
appeared – comes up empty. Deeper digging determines that the exact
photograph was one that was formerly used on the “*Adam’s Story*” *Facebook*
group, a forum run by Adam and his family. There are two other places that
particular photograph has appeared: on the Rehtaeh Parsons website, and
yes, you guessed it, on Glen Canning’s own website.

Another item of interest: Anne P.’s Twitter username, Terminal_Zen, was
changed just this morning, to something else. Which is notable because Glen
has an affinity to the concept of Zen: a section of his website is even
dedicated to “Seeking Zen”.

Anne P’s N.S. Live profile was deleted earlier this week. But screengrabs
taken by Frank Magazine show Glen – sorry, Anne P. – calling Glen Canning’s
detractors “retards,” “psychotic assholes,” and more. And, on one occasion,
as I mentioned up top, the one which invites a critic to kill himself.

In a thread dedicated to criticizing former *Coast* honcho/current *Halifax
Examiner* editor *Tim Bousquet*, Anne P. tells one commenter to “shoot
yourself. please”.

Two days before Glen – sorry, Anne P. – uttered those words, an article
appeared on *glencanning.com<http://glencanning.com>* with the
headline *Cyber-hate
is no joke*. To highlight just how far kids will go when showering hate on
one another, a real “mean tweet” is quoted verbatim:

“No one likes you. Do every one a favour. Kill yourself”.

It would seem there’s no shortage of adults willing to use such language
today as well.

Tonight, *March 26*, Glen Canning is scheduled to appear on an internet
radio chat show – at *voiceamerica.com<http://voiceamerica.com>* – in
order to discuss Rehtaeh, and “other victims of sexual violence and
cyber-harassment”. It sounds like one of those open-line call-in shows, so
I hope someone calls to ask him his thoughts about any “cyber-harassment”
he himself might have participated in lately.

*andrew@frankmagazine.ca<andrew@frankmagazine.ca> *


February 24, 2015
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/24/david-amos-is-gone/>
David Amos is Gone
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/24/david-amos-is-gone/>
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/>

For several years I have enabled a stupid man, an uneducated man, a
criminal man, a pedophile, a liar, an animal that called my wife, my
daughter, my wife’s employer, my landlord, the owner of my favourite pub,
the mayor, the Premier of Alberta, the Prime Minister, the amerkan FBI, US
Marshall’s Service, Canadian Forces Military Police, the Military Police
Complaints Commission, the RCMP, the RCMP Complaints Commission…et al.

This animal e mailed me at least 10 times a day. He has been blocked, David
Amos is done. I will of course write here in this blog about him, and his
family of cum swallowing sex workers…But David Amos has been silenced.

Leave a Comment
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/24/david-amos-is-gone/#respond>

February 23, 2015
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/23/glenford-canning-david-amos-and-edmonton-city-council/>
Glenford Canning, David Amos, and Edmonton City Council
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/23/glenford-canning-david-amos-and-edmonton-city-council/>
by baconfatreport
<https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/author/baconfatreport/>

Alberta Municipal Affairs Minister Dianna McQueen said, “Alberta’s cities
should not expect to be immune from cuts in the coming budget, even though
no decisions have been made yet.” She further announced, “the collapse in
oil prices drills a 7 billion dollar hole in Alberta coffers, which means
the province has to look at everything.”

Meanwhile back at Edmonton City Council Chambers, Ben “I want to be your
ho,” Henderson has his earphones on, listening to the dulcet strains of
Maria Dunne, stroking his crotch, and wishing for a blow job from her. Ben
“I want to be your ho” Henderson’s hero is Bill Clinton and loves chunky
bimbos in blue dresses.

Grandmother Bev Essinger the only bimbo on Edmonton City Council, has just
shot up ketamine. She is happily in the “K Hole.” Her eyes are glazed over,
her mouth drooling, and she is reclining in her chair with her legs spread,
skirt hiked up, and  council creature Michael Oshry is lapping at her
pussy , as council is “called to order” by His Honour “the mayor.”  “His
Honour” Don “the vacuous” Iveson begins to drone on once again how the
“province” and the federal government “need to make more investments in
backhanders to city politicians, and cash to municipal budgets, so
both,  crooked addicted politicians, and the cities, “can have nice
things.” These are the same degenerate drug and sex  addicts that
raised the city property tax rate by 5.8% and raised their salaries by 3.8
% .  Mayor Don “the vacuous” Iveson says. “We’re all in this together,” but
 I don’t see “council” sharing with the public any of the free dope they
get. ” I mean really!”

In this “council meeting” its clear His honour “the mayor” has few
coherent, lucid moments remaining. He tries to convince “council” of
the necessity of “approving an additional tax levy on Edmontonians” to buy
more quality drugs for “council” and to “fund other future LRT lines.” In
Dandy Don’s last coherent thoughts in this meeting, and orgy, he suggests
Edmonton transit users, also ought be charged more, in the form of
increases from one to ten percent. Don Iveson on heroin called
this, “council” developing a long-term strategy for transit. Most people
would call it an insane and drug fueled attempt to “get blood from a stone.”

Whilst Edmonton’s august City Council is “meeting” David Amos and his
“kiddies” Laura “the butt”, Gracie “the slut,” and Max “the angry faggot”
are circulating around “council” soliciting drug, and alcohol
inspired, entirely consensual , pay as you go sexual services. Business
appears to be brisk. David Amos’ faggot son has his pants around his ankles
and lubing up his “corn hole”  for little Michael Oshry.

Glenford Canning is looking for a unoccupied dick to take a ” dic pic” of
for his twitter account and to latch his lips onto, and then I imagine, to
cry rape! Little David Amos, is in the corner of “council chambers”
masturbating, thinking of the next batch of spam e mails he’s going to send
tonight.

There you have it, another “city council” meeting. They say. “Canadians
love good government and lots of it!” But is there anyone in their right
mind that would call this…”peace order and good government?”

“It was rape Daddy, really!”







https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/11/methinks-somebody-in-cbc-should-say-hey.html
 
 
 

Monday, 23 November 2020

Methinks somebody in CBC should say hey to your old buddies Landslide Annie and Big Bad Billy Blair for me N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The Younger???

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

 



Replying to
Methinks somebody in CBC should say hey to your old buddies Landslide Annie and Big Bad Billy Blair for me N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The Younger???  

 

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/11/methinks-somebody-in-cbc-should-say-hey.html

 
 

 #nbpoli#cdnpoli

 

https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/longform/nova-scotia-shooting-13-deadly-hours

 

 







Replying to
Methinks the CBC will NEVER reveal the truth This will be another attempt to make the RCMP appear to be not as incompetent and corrupt as they truly are N'esy Pas? 

 

 davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/indepe


 #nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/community/fifth-estate-premiere-1.5809952

 

Season premiere: Documentary about the N.S. shootings

Thirteen Deadly Hours: The Nova Scotia Shootings airs Monday, Nov. 23 at 9 p.m. on CBC TV / CBC Gem

 

CBC Communications· Posted: Nov 20, 2020 2:28 PM AT

 

 

The Fifth Estate presents a comprehensive inquiry into this year's mass shooting in Nova Scotia, chronicling 13 hours of mayhem that constitute one of Canada's deadliest events. We hear from the families of many of the 22 victims, and the terrible final moments their loved ones faced. Many questions remain about how the RCMP responded to the situation, and whether enough was done to protect the community.

Watch The Fifth Estate Monday, Nov. 23 9 p.m. (9:30 NT) on CBC TV and CBC Gem.

Tune in to CBC Nova Scotia News Tuesday at 6 p.m. for an encore broadcast. 

Related stories: 

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjxatZIus_o


Police Corruption? Nova Scotia Shooter - Behind The Scenes


86,369 views
Streamed live on Jul 28, 2020

Nova Scotia Shooter Behind The Scenes with Paul Palango a former senior editor at The Globe and Mail and author of three books on the RCMP, the most recent being Dispersing the Fog, Inside the Secret World of Ottawa and the RCMP. His work on the Nova Scotia massacre has been published in MacLeans and the Halifax Examiner.
 
 
---------- Original message ----------
From: Timothy Bousquet <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 05:41:36 -0300
Subject: Re: fea3
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello, I’m taking a much-needed vacation and will not be responding to
email until August 4. If this is urgent Halifax Examiner business,
please email zane@halifaxexaminer.ca.

Thanks,

Tim Bousquet
Editor
Halifax Examiner
 

----------Origiinal message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:09:14 -0300
Subject: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." What a
difference a day makes EH? Notice CBC ain't talking about this yet?
To: "darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
< barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
< Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
< washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, prmibullrun@gmail.com,
"Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson"
< Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>



----------Origiinal message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:04:25 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Bill.Blair Now that a full Public Inquiry is in order
Methinks people such as Anne McLellan, Ralph Goodale Leanne Fitch,
Allan Carroll, Mark Furey and YOU should testify under oath N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
Government of Canada website at
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
composant le
1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.




----------Origiinal message ----------
From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:04:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
confirmation your message has been received.

We recognize that Nova Scotians have concerns about novel coronavirus
(COVID-19). If you are looking for up-to-date information, we
encourage you to visit:
novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/

> or
canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.

If you are experiencing symptoms, please use the COVID-19 online
self-assessment, which can be found here:
https://when-to-call-about-covid19.novascotia.ca/en

On April 18th and 19th, our province experienced an unimaginable
tragedy, in already difficult times.

To share your condolences, please visit StrongerTogetherNS on
Facebook, or by sending them to
condolences@novascotia.ca<mailto:condolences@novascotia.ca>.

To contribute to the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, created in
partnership with the Canadian Red Cross, visit redcross.ca and search
for the Stronger Together Nova Scotia Fund, or call 1-800-418-1111.

Kind Regards,

Premier’s Correspondence Team

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioT6vj0zA_Q&t=3045s


Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government

 
58,732 views
Streamed live on Jul 27, 2020
 
Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government - Peter Mac Issac
 
 ----------Origiinal message ----------
 From: Peter Mac Isaac <prmibullrun@gmail.com>
 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:42:20 -0300
 Subject: Re: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry Event." Methinks
it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by the Pierre Elliott
 Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

 A lot of info to chew on - every now and then we win one - Today we
 won a partial victory when the provincial liberals threw the federal
 liberals under the bus forcing their hand . Now the spin will be to
 get a judge they can control.
 
 
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Pineo, Robert"<RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 04:40:12 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: 13 deadly hours Perhaps Elizabeth McMillan
and Lisa Mayor should have another talk with the lawyers Sean.Fraser
and Robert Pineo EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. I will be attending outside meetings during
the week of November 16, 2020 and will not have access to my telephone
or email. I will return your messages during the evenings. Thank you
and have a nice day.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 04:40:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: 13 deadly hours Perhaps Elizabeth McMillan
and Lisa Mayor should have another talk with the lawyers Sean.Fraser
and Robert Pineo EH?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

On 11/23/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/longform/nova-scotia-shooting-13-deadly-hours
>
>
> 13 deadly hours
>
> November 22, 2020
>
> Over 13 hours, a man disguised as a Mountie travelled nearly 200
> kilometres through Nova Scotia, killing 22 people. The Fifth Estate
> explores what the RCMP knew about the gunman that night, how they
> remained one step behind and why the public was left in the dark.
>
> Text by Elizabeth McMillan and Lisa Mayor
>
> Editing by Janet Davison
>
> "It seems to me that the RCMP are not wanting the entire story to come
> out about how the response to this tragedy took place," Rob Pineo, a
> lawyer representing the families of the victims in a lawsuit against
> the shooter's estate, told The Fifth Estate. "To be frank, [their
> response] seems to be quite embarrassing [for the RCMP]."
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html
>
>
> Wednesday, 29 July 2020
>
> Federal and provincial governments to hold public inquiry into Nova
> Scotia mass shootings
>
>
> https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
>
> David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
> Replying to @DavidRayAmos
> Methinks lots of folks may enjoy what Peter Mac Issac and his cohorts
> said while the RCMP and a lot of LIEbranos were stuttering and
> doubletalking bigtime N'esy Pas?
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/07/rallies-continue-push-for-public.html
>
>
>   #nbpoli #cdnpoli
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioT6vj0zA_Q&t=3045s
>
>
> Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government
> 18,724 views
> •Streamed live on Jul 27, 2020
>
>
> Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson
> 38K subscribers
> Citizens Rise Against Corruption in Trudeau Government - Peter Mac Issac
>
>
> ----------Origiinal message ----------
> From: Sean.Fraser@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 10:33:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Melanie Joly and Pablo Rodriguez Methinks
> Steven Guilbeault, his buddy Catherine Tait and all your former nasty
> minions in CBC must take courses on playing dumb N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for your message. Please note that due to the volume of
> inquiries our offices are receiving, I have written an automated
> message below, and I have attached frequently asked questions to try
> and address some of the common things we are hearing about. If you
> still have questions about the Government’s response to COVID-19 after
> reading the below, please reply to this e-mail and we will be pleased
> to assist you.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Pineo, Robert"<RPineo@pattersonlaw.ca>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 15:25:26 +0000
> Subject: Re: RE Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed by
> “Independent Review” I just called Correct?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, "McCulloch, Sandra"
> < smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Why are you quoting my statement back to me?
>
> Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
>
> ________________________________
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 9:53 AM
> To: smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca; rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca
> Cc: motomaniac333
> Subject: RE Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed by “Independent
> Review” I just called Correct?
>
> http://www.pattersonlaw.ca/News/NewsArticleView/tabid/179/ArticleId/1746/Families-of-Shooting-Victims-Disappointed-by-Independent-Review.aspx
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "McCulloch, Sandra"<smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:53:30 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed
> by “Independent Review” I just called Correct?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
>
> Thank you for your email. I will be away from my office conducting
> discovery examinations on July 27th through 29th.  I will respond to
> your e-mail as soon as possible.  Please contact 902.897.2000 if your
> matter requires more urgent
> attention.https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/longform/nova-scotia-shooting-13-deadly-hours
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:53:20 -0300
> Subject: RE Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed by “Independent
> Review” I just called Correct?
> To: smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca, rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> http://www.pattersonlaw.ca/News/NewsArticleView/tabid/179/ArticleId/1746/Families-of-Shooting-Victims-Disappointed-by-Independent-Review.aspx
>
>
> Families of Shooting Victims Disappointed by “Independent Review”
>
> The “Independent Review” announced by Ministers Furey and Blair is
> wholly insufficient to meet the objectives of providing full and
> transparent answers to the families and the public, identifying
> deficiencies in responses, and providing meaningful lessons to be
> learned to avoid similar future tragedies.
>
> The choices of commissioners, and in particular Former Chief Justice
> Michael MacDonald, were thoughtful and appropriate for an inquiry.
> Former Chief Justice MacDonald is of the highest rank in judicial
> capabilities and is of unassailable integrity. That said, any
> decision- maker can only render decisions based on the information and
> evidence presented to them.
>
> The announced “independent review” model, to be conducted in a
> so-called “non- traumatic” and “restorative” way, will prejudice the
> panel by restricting the evidence and information being presented.
>
> In a public inquiry setting, such as was employed in the Marshall and
> Westray public inquiries, interested parties had the opportunity to
> question the witnesses. It is a very well- held maxim in our common
> law legal tradition, that cross-examination is the most effective
> truth-finding mechanism available. Without proper and thorough
> questioning, the panel will be left with incomplete and untested
> evidence upon which to base its decision. This is completely contrary
> to our Canadian notions of fair and transparent justice.
>
> Most disappointingly, Ministers Furey and Blair have hidden behind
> their contrived notion of a “trauma-free” process to exclude the full
> participation of the families under the guise of protecting them from
> further trauma. This is not how the families wish to be treated.
> Minister Furey has spoken with the families, so he must know that they
> want to participate, not to be “protected” by an incomplete process.
>
> The families want a full and transparent public inquiry. Why will
> Minister Furey not give them this? Why will he not give the citizens
> of Nova Scotia this? “We are all in this together” has been the slogan
> throughout 2020 - the families simply want us all, the public, to be
> in this together now to figure out a better tomorrow for families and
> the Province.
>
> For further inquiries, please contact:
>
> Robert H. Pineo
> 902-405-8177
> rpineo@pattersonlaw.ca
>
>
> Sandra L. McCulloch
> 902-896-6114
> smcculloch@pattersonlaw.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 09:04:13 -0300
> Subject: YO Bill.Blair Now that a full Public Inquiry is in order
> Methinks people such as Anne McLellan, Ralph Goodale Leanne Fitch,
> Allan Carroll, Mark Furey and YOU should testify under oath N'esy Pas?
> To: Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, CabalCookies
> < cabalcookies@protonmail.com>, El.Jones@msvu.ca,
> tim@halifaxexaminer.ca, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp.gc.ca, Charles.Murray@gnb.ca, JUSTWEB
> < JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>, AgentMargaritaville@protonmail.com,
> "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "kevin.leahy"
> < kevin.leahy@pps-spp.parl.gc.ca>, lagenomai4@protonmail.com,
> mlaritcey@bellaliant.com, mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com,
> toryrushtonmla@bellaliant.com, kelly@kellyregan.ca,
> mla_assistant@alanapaon.com, stephenmcneil@ns.aliantzinc.ca, PREMIER
> < PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, info@hughmackay.ca, pictoueastamanda@gmail.com,
> markfurey.mla@eastlink.ca, claudiachendermla@gmail.com,
> FinanceMinister@novascotia.ca, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
> kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, istayhealthy8@gmail.com,
> prmi@eastlink.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>,
> "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 21:48:08 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The "Strike back: Demand an inquiry
> Event." Methinks it interesting that Martha Paynter is supported by
> the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation N'esy Pas?
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca
>
>>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.cabill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> After backlash, governments agree to hold public inquiry into Nova
> Scotia shooting
> By Alexander Quon & Elizabeth McSheffrey Global News
> Posted July 28, 2020 10:42 am
>
> WATCH: The federal government is now proceeding with a public inquiry
> into the Nova Scotia massacre that left 22 innocent people dead in
> April. Elizabeth McSheffrey looks at why Ottawa is changing paths now,
> and what the inquiry has the power to do.
>
> The decision to hold a review into the mass killing in April that
> resulted in the deaths of 22 people in Nova Scotia took three months
> to arrange. In less than a week the decision has been undone after a
> massive wave of public backlash.
>
> Federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair announced on Tuesday a
> public inquiry will be held into the mass shooting that began in
> Portapique, N.S. on April 18 and came to an end nearly 100 km away, 13
> hours later.
>
> “The Government of Canada is now proceeding with a full Public
> Inquiry, under the authority of the Inquiries Act,” said Blair in a
> statement.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Allan Carroll <allan.carroll@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:14:09 -0400
> Subject: Re: Trust that Murray Segal's appointment to whitewash the
> Rehteah Parsons matter did not surprise me after the meail I sent this
> weekend (AOL)
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be AOL commencing  July 27, 2013  and returning on August 13,
> 2013.  Cpl David Baldwin of Amherst Det will be assuming my duties
> during my absence. Should you require immediate assistance, please
> contact the main Amherst office number at 902-667-3859.
>
> For inquiries about the Crisis Negotiation Team, please contact
> Sgt.Royce MacRae at 902-720-5426 (w) or 902-471-8776 (c)
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Leanne"<leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:05:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Now this
> is interesting As soon as Brad Wall got reelected as Premier he began
> blocking my email Go Figure EH David Drummond???
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
> an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be repleid
> to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response please send
> your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton Police Force,
> 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506) 460-2300.
>
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
> retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
> and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
> appreciated.
>
> Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
> of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
> provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
> Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
> organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
> confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
> interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
> disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
> fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
> présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
> et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
> électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
> reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
>
> Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
> Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
> dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
> de la vie privée.
>
> GOV-OP-073
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:39:00 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks this afternoon Harjit Sajjan and
> his minions should go to Federal Court pull my file (T-1557-15) from
> the docket then read statement 83 real slow N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
> message sera examin? avec attention.
> Merci!
> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
> S?curit? publique Canada
> *********
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
> Thank you!
> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
> Public Safety Canada
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Fitch, Leanne"<leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca>
> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 16:38:59 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks this afternoon Harjit Sajjan and
> his minions should go to Federal Court pull my file (T-1557-15) from
> the docket then read statement 83 real slow N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is
> an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your message may not be
> responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response
> please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton
> Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506)
> 460-2300. If this is an emergency related to public safety please call
> 911.
>
> En raison du grand nombre de courriels que reçoit cette messagerie, il
> se peut qu’une réponse tarde un peu à venir. Si vous avez besoin d'une
> réponse officielle, veuillez envoyer votre demande par écrit à mon
> attention aux soins (a/s) de la Force policière de Fredericton 311,
> rue Queen, Fredericton, NB   E3B 1B1, ou composer le 506 460-2300.
> S'il s'agit d'une urgence de sécurité publique, faites le 911.
>
>
> This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is
> intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If
> you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review,
> retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or
> other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
> contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail
> and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is
> appreciated.
>
> Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents
> of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the
> provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and
> Protection of Privacy Act.
>
> Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse
> uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un
> organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou
> confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est
> interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de
> disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y
> fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le
> présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur
> et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
> électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
> reconnaissants de votre collaboration.
>
> Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la
> Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux
> dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection
> de la vie privée.
>
> GOV-OP-073
>
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> Friday, 18 September 2015
> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>
 
 
 
 
 


 

13 deadly hours

Over 13 hours, a man disguised as a Mountie travelled nearly 200 kilometres through Nova Scotia, killing 22 people. The Fifth Estate explores what the RCMP knew about the gunman that night, how they remained one step behind and why the public was left in the dark.

November 22, 2020

It was just days before his 46th birthday and Greg Blair was finally mortgage- and debt-free. He and his wife, Jamie — affectionately known as Chicken to her friends and family — ran a business together, selling and installing propane and natural gas equipment across Nova Scotia. In their downtime, they loved being outdoors and spent their days surrounded by family.

"They're great people," Tyler Blair told The Fifth Estate. "Very hard workers. My father worked very hard his whole life and ... was about to start living life."

On the night of April 18, 2020, the Blairs hosted two neighbours for dinner in their rural community of Portapique. With COVID-19 restrictions in place, they ate steak and potatoes at a table set up in the garage with the doors open, allowing the cool spring air in.

After dinner, the couple planned to spend the evening burning some brush they'd cleared that day. But around 10 p.m. that night, their plans were interrupted.

  • WATCH | The Fifth Estate: 13 Deadly Hours on Monday, Nov. 23 at 9 p.m. on CBC-TV and CBC Gem

Gabriel Wortman wasn't a friend of the Blairs. The denturist had a log cottage on Portapique Beach Road, the next road over, and would drive by their house on the way to his other property, a lavish garage where he meticulously worked on his collection of motorcycles.

Parked inside that warehouse on Orchard Beach Road, unknown to many, was a fully marked replica police vehicle Wortman had put together.

People in the community considered Wortman eccentric. From time to time, he'd show off his bar with its extensive liquor supply inside the wood-panelled garage. But some who knew him say he was a nasty drunk and prone to fits of rage — whether it be directed at people he'd hire to work on his property or his long-term partner.

That April night, after RCMP say he got in an argument with his partner, Wortman started a rampage, killing 22 people across Nova Scotia in Canada's largest mass shooting in modern history: 13 people in Portapique; four in Wentworth; two in Debert; three more in Shubenacadie.

WATCH | Tyler Blair says his dad and stepmom were "great people":

 


And for almost 12 hours after he left the community, the people of Nova Scotia would receive little information from the RCMP about the danger that stalked rural roads; a man killing at random disguised as a Mountie.

The Fifth Estate has learned the RCMP received crucial details, including the identity of the suspect and that he was driving what appeared to be a fully marked replica police car, from the first person they encountered on the scene that night in Portapique at 10:26 p.m., nearly 12 hours before they shared it with the public — information victims' families say could have saved the lives of their loved ones.

Saturday: 10:01 p.m.

In the seven months since, Tyler Blair, 27, has learned only some of the specifics of what happened to his dad and stepmom that night.

He told The Fifth Estate that while his younger brothers, aged 10 and 12, were playing video games, his stepmother Jamie and the young boys heard Greg yell, "What the f--k are you doing with a gun?"

They heard a shot. In an instant, Greg was killed steps from his front door.

"That's when Jamie ran back into the [house] and got [my brothers] and pushed them down the hallway, and they all ran down into their bedroom," Tyler Blair said.

He said his stepmother called 911 at 10:01 p.m. She was the first person to alert the RCMP to a problem in Portapique. She stayed on the line while shielding her sons from the gunman on the other side of the bedroom door.

Greg and Jamie Blair were killed at their home as their two young sons hid under a bed, where a bullet nearly missed them as it went through the mattress. (Jamie Blair/Facebook)

Greg and Jamie Blair were killed at their home as their two young sons hid under a bed, where a bullet nearly missed them as it went through the mattress. (Jamie Blair/Facebook)  

"My two little brothers hid behind the bed, and Jamie put her back up against the interior door of their bedroom," Tyler Blair said. "He just shot right through it."

Much later, when Tyler went to the house to collect some of Greg and Jamie's things, he said he found at least eight bullet holes through that bedroom door.

"There's one that actually went through the mattress of the bed, where my little brothers were hiding, and probably missed them by about a foot," he said.

After witnessing their mother die, the young boys realized the gunman was trying to set the house on fire. The older boy found logs from their wood stove strewn across the floor. The propane stove was on, with hotdog and hamburger buns thrown on the top near the flaming elements.

Seven months later, bullet holes can be seen in a window and the exterior wall of the Blairs' house. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

Seven months later, bullet holes can be seen in a window and the exterior wall of the Blairs' house. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)  

The brothers bolted through the woods towards their neighbour's house to seek help.

In the meantime, the shooter continued on his rampage through Portapique. Thirteen people would be dead by the time he left the community, and he was far from finished.

Saturday: About 10:05 p.m.

Next door to the Blairs, elementary school teacher Lisa McCully had been enjoying the saltwater air during her nightly ritual — a peaceful walk along the shore.

Portapique is a small, rural community overlooking a river that flows into Cobequid Bay, the easternmost tip of the Bay of Fundy. It's made up of a mix of cottages, trailers and homes nestled on the shore. There are a handful of gravel roads and no street lights. About 100 or so people call the area home, although the population doubles during the summer when families flock to the beach.

McCully moved to the area in part because she loved being close to nature. When she wasn't making music, the 49-year-old spent her free time hiking, doing yoga and playing with her children.

"She was fearless, she was your classic mama bear, she was so protective of everyone," said her sister Jenny Kierstead.

After McCully returned home and put her son and daughter to bed that evening, she noticed something troubling and stepped outside.

She lived directly across from Wortman's garage, though dense spruce trees usually blocked the view of anything beyond the driveway and the metal gate he normally kept locked. That night though, the building's frame was disintegrating against the moonless sky.

"She had gone out to see these flames that were higher than the tree line, and went out because she saw an RCMP officer," Kierstead said. "Probably [to] ask, should we evacuate, what the heck is going on?"

The burned-out patch of grass shows where Gabriel Wortman's garage used to be — directly across the road from Lisa McCully's red house. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

The burned-out patch of grass shows where Gabriel Wortman's garage used to be — directly across the road from Lisa McCully's red house. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)  

McCully called 911 and then approached someone she thought was a Mountie there to help.

It was Wortman, dressed as an RCMP officer — standing near a marked vehicle. As she approached him, he shot and killed her.

Kierstead said it was reassuring to learn from police that her sister died instantly.

McCully's children remained inside alone but answered the door when the Blair boys later showed up looking for help. After calling 911, the four friends huddled under the stairs in the basement.

The RCMP dispatcher tried to keep them calm and told them to wait for someone to rescue them. The dispatcher told the kids an RCMP officer would have a special word they would tell the children so they would know it was a real officer — and that it was finally safe to come out.

Saturday: 10:20 p.m.

Lisa McCully wasn't the only person alarmed by the fire at Wortman's garage. After they noticed flames, a man and woman who lived up the road jumped in their car to get a closer look and called 911.

The man, who we'll refer to as PR, has never spoken publicly about his experience and declined to be interviewed.

TheFifth Estate obtained an audio statement he gave in August to a private investigator who is working on behalf of victims' families to investigate the events of that night.

In the statement, he describes telling the RCMP about being shot by Wortman in a mock-RCMP vehicle — information the RCMP didn't share with the public until more than 12 hours after they'd received it.

PR said that while driving to see what was going on, he and his wife spotted an RCMP vehicle parked in front of Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn's blue house at the top of Orchard Beach Drive.

Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn's retirement home in Portapique no longer exists. It was one of three homes belonging to victims that the gunman burned. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn's retirement home in Portapique no longer exists. It was one of three homes belonging to victims that the gunman burned. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)  

PR said they told the dispatcher that it appeared an RCMP officer was already on scene, but he found it strange that the car was empty and the roof lights weren't on.

The couple continued down the road towards the fire, and as they got closer realized it was coming from the denturist's garage. PR said he thought to call his neighbour Gabe and tell him, but remembered Gabe didn't have a cellphone. PR and Gabe were friendly — they'd been neighbours for nearly a decade. PR said they would have a beer together now and then or talk about working on cars or motorcycles.

After seeing the fire, PR and his wife turned around and went back up the road — still on the phone with 911, where the operator was trying to transfer them to the fire department. They stopped in front of the Gulenchyns' and noticed someone was now in the cruiser.

"Over the cop car and through the kitchen window the whole kitchen lit up on fire fast," PR said. "Like, fast. So, we kinda [thought], something's wrong."

"Not very often you see two fires at once and like, why is there a police officer here?" he said. "It didn't make sense."

(CBC)

TheFifth Estate has learned that by that point, at least three people had called 911, including Jamie Blair, who reported that her husband was killed by a gunman before she, too, was shot shortly after 10 p.m.

But PR said the dispatcher didn't tell him what was going on. Months later, he told the investigator that he is still frustrated that he and his wife weren't warned of the danger ahead.

"So there's 20-some minutes before we called and ... they should have told us to get the f--k out of there, but they didn't," he said in the audio obtained by The Fifth Estate."Why didn't the dispatcher know to tell us to get out of there because people are getting shot?"

As they drove back towards their house, they noticed someone was in the RCMP car — and that person started driving towards them. The car pulled up beside PR and his wife.

"I rolled down the window to tell the RCMP officer that one, we're not lighting the fires, and two, we're on the phone with 911," PR said.

That's when the man he thought was an RCMP officer rolled down his own window and started firing a handgun at them.

PR recognized the shooter was his neighbour, Gabriel Wortman.

"We ducked quickly and I got shot in my forehead and one went through my arm," the audio tapes obtained by The Fifth Estate reveal. "My wife was OK but at that point I saw Gabe ... and I saw his gun. He had a laser sight on the gun and thank God he did, because if not I wouldn't have seen the handgun at all because it was dark."

Despite being hit twice — one bullet through the shoulder, the other grazing his forehead — PR managed to drive away.

Around 10:26, he encountered the first RCMP officer on scene. His account was confirmed in a summary of his police statement contained in search warrant documents CBC and other media organizations obtained in court.

WATCH | Clinton Ellison describes the terrifying night he spent hiding in the woods after he discovered his brother had been shot by the gunman:


Clinton Ellison says he hid in the woods for hours after discovering the body of his brother, Corrie, the night of the mass shooting in Portapique.

The Fifth Estate has learned it was at this point PR told the RCMP officer that crucial information about the suspect and his disguise.

"I told [the RCMP officer] right away it's my neighbour Gabe," PR said in the audio tape. "[I told him] he had ... an RCMP car. I knew he had those cars but I'd never seen them badged ... So that's when I first told him it was him in the car."

The constable he told this to immediately relayed the information over his police radio, PR said.

By this point, PR said, there were three officers on scene: The first to whom he told the information, the second who checked his gunshot wounds to make sure he was OK and the third, who took him and his wife to the end of the road to wait for help.

"[That officer] was watching the woods to make sure nothing came out at us," he said in the interview obtained by The Fifth Estate.

"It was dark and it was terrifying for anybody there," he said. "I don't know how they, those first officers on scene, I can't imagine what they had to walk into."

RCMP 'overwhelmed'

Audio of Nova Scotia's Emergency Health Services (EHS) dispatch that night reveals that at 10:49 p.m., they were told RCMP were "overwhelmed" and needed help.

When the specialized Emergency Response Team (ERT) eventually arrived kitted out in SWAT gear from Halifax, 130 kilometres away, they tried to clear some houses on the first road in the subdivision — pounding on doors and telling people to get out fast. They left others to sleep through the night, unaware of what was happening around them.

But it's unclear what happened on the ground when police arrived. In the seven months since the tragedy, the RCMP would not say how many officers were dispatched but insist the support was sufficient and officers followed their training.

"As dictated by their training, their objective was to locate and to stop that threat," Supt. Darren Campbell said in a media conference on June 4. "This is exactly what those RCMP first responders were working towards."

Portapique is nestled on the shores of Cobequid Bay, which leads into the Bay of Fundy. Along the eastern edge, there is a dirt road along a blueberry field that the gunman used to get out of the community. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

Portapique is nestled on the shores of Cobequid Bay, which leads into the Bay of Fundy. Along the eastern edge, there is a dirt road along a blueberry field that the gunman used to get out of the community. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)  

People who were in the area that night have a different story.

Witnesses have told The Fifth Estate the initial response consisted of three to four officers. How, when or even if they advanced on the scene in Portapique is still a mystery.

A neighbour, who spoke to The Fifth Estate on the condition of anonymity, said he didn't see any police presence on Orchard Beach Drive, the scene of six killings, until the emergency response team arrived at 12:45 a.m. Sunday — nearly three hours after he called 911 reporting gunshots.

Another resident, Leon Joudrey, said he encountered an ERT vehicle outside Wortman's burnt cottage but didn't see any police officers when he drove around Orchard Beach Road around 4 a.m., unaware his neighbours had been killed.

"It seems to me that the RCMP are not wanting the entire story to come out about how the response to this tragedy took place," Rob Pineo, a lawyer representing the families of the victims in a lawsuit against the shooter's estate, told The Fifth Estate. "To be frank, [their response] seems to be quite embarrassing [for the RCMP]."

The Fifth Estate has learned police didn't make it to the home of Emily, Jolene and Oliver Tuck until 19 hours after police believe they were killed in their home. Investigators would later tell family members they didn't discover the three bodies until 5 p.m. Sunday — 19 hours after police believe they were killed.

It would also take the RCMP more than two hours to rescue the four children hiding in Lisa McCully's basement.

The two McCully children and the two Blair children hid in the basement of Lisa McCully’s house for more than two hours, waiting for the RCMP to rescue them. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

The two McCully children and the two Blair children hid in the basement of Lisa McCully’s house for more than two hours, waiting for the RCMP to rescue them. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)  

"It shouldn't take two hours to go in and get four young kids out of an area that you know some madman's running around with a gun," Blair told The Fifth Estate. "It is a f--king long time for them to be sitting there ... I don't know why somebody wasn't sent in earlier to get them out of there."

The RCMP later told their families that as many as six officers were stationed around the house to protect the children. But Blair doesn't buy it.

"The RCMP have been caught in so many lies already," he told The Fifth Estate. "It's hard for me to believe a word that comes out of their mouth."

On the ground and in their makeshift operations headquarters in a nearby firehall, the RCMP seemed to be putting the pieces together about the horror that had unfolded in Portapique.

Around 3 a.m., an RCMP investigator called PR to go over his story again. They spoke for about an hour and PR sent the investigator a photo of Wortman he'd found on Facebook, "just to confirm," he said.

PR said in total, he told the RCMP three times about Wortman and the marked car.

But it wouldn't be until 12 hours after PR's first conversation that the RCMP would share that crucial information with the public.

The RCMP has repeatedly refused to speak with The Fifth Estate about the mass shootings.

During the 13-hour rampage, the RCMP communicated with the public via Twitter. They'd later say they were counting on local media to relay information to the public.

At 11:32 p.m. the RCMP first tweeted they were dealing with a "firearms complaint" in Portapique — no mention of fires, a gunman or anyone being hurt or killed. 

(CBC)

And critically, no mention of those key details The Fifth Estate has learned they were investigating overnight: that it was Wortman in a mock-RCMP vehicle.

According to internal bulletins that were circulated to police agencies across the province, by 1 a.m., the RCMP had identified the 51-year-old as a suspect who was "armed and dangerous" and associated him with "an old white police car."

The RCMP spent the night tracking vehicles associated with the gunman, including three decommissioned police cars. They found one white Ford Taurus burning at each of the shooter's properties in Portapique. A third would be located at his business in Dartmouth.

When all three cars had been accounted for, The Fifth Estate has learned the RCMP made a fateful assumption. By dawn, they concluded the gunman must have taken his own life — not an unusual outcome after a violent rampage — and thought they'd find the evidence somewhere in the rubble of his torched properties.

An RCMP source says some officers were even sent home at that point.

And while Mounties blocked off a section of Highway 2 connected to Portapique Beach Road, there was something else they hadn't realized: Portapique had a back way out — a dirt road along a blueberry field that leads to the highway, a few hundred metres from the subdivision's main entrance.

RCMP have said their investigation later determined the gunman escaped down that road about 20 minutes after police arrived — driving approximately 27 kilometres to the community of Debert. He spent the night parked behind a welding shop.

Sunday: 6:30 a.m.

The RCMP have always insisted they didn't know that Wortman was using a replica police car until around 6:30 a.m. Sunday.

"Those details came in their totality to us early in the morning of Sunday, after a key witness was located and interviewed," RCMP said in a media conference on April 22. "Prior to that time, we did not have all those details. The bulk of the details about our suspect came to us at that time."

That key witness was the gunman's spouse. Police say they got in a fight and he assaulted her, which was the start of the rampage that Saturday night.

The Fifth Estate has learned the woman told investigators that Wortman restrained her with a handcuff on one of her wrists. She said she escaped from the marked police car by crawling through the window in the divider between the front and backseat, fleeing and hiding until daybreak.

Around 8 a.m., after police spoke with her, an updated bulletin was sent out, telling other police forces the gunman was potentially driving a "fully marked Ford Taurus," and gave the car number. It warned "he could be anywhere in the province" and "was arrestable for homicide."

At almost the same time the RCMP was telling other police services that information, the force released its second tweet — saying there was an "active shooter" investigation in Portapique, not "anywhere in the province" as they had said internally.

Two hours later, around 9 a.m., the RCMP identified Wortman publicly as the suspected shooter in a tweet. But that tweet still contained no mention of a mock-RCMP car or a police uniform.

It wouldn't be until after 10 a.m. Sunday, and after the gunman killed 19 people, that police would release this information. It remains unclear why they waited.

They also didn't mention he could be anywhere in the province, as they'd identified internally — or even the possibility that he'd left Portapique, where he left behind the bodies of 13 of his neighbours.

Among those killed in Portapique were Jolene Oliver, Aaron Tuck and their daughter Emily and three couples who retired to Portapique in recent years: Joy and Peter Bond, Frank and Dawn Gulenchyn and John Zahl and Joanne Thomas. Corrie Ellison, 42, was also shot on Orchard Beach Road after going to see if anyone was in trouble when he spotted the flames at Wortman's warehouse. His brother, who discovered his body, hid in the woods for hours fearing the gunman was after him, too.

Seven months later, many families of 22 victims who were killed in Canada's largest mass shooting struggle with what they say is a lack of information from the RCMP. (CBC)

Seven months later, many families of 22 victims who were killed in Canada's largest mass shooting struggle with what they say is a lack of information from the RCMP. (CBC)  

Sunday: 6:30 a.m.

As word of the destruction began to travel informally among family and friends, people awoke to their normal Sunday routines. For those whose weekend rituals included scrolling through social media, some spotted posts about police activity in a corner of Colchester County.

At this point, the information released to the public via Twitter by the RCMP was still only that there was an active shooter in Portapique, and residents in that area should stay inside with their doors locked. People in other parts of the province were cautious, but saw no reason to worry.

But that bright Sunday morning, what looked like a Mountie in a patrol car was travelling north, taking the lone highway into the Wentworth Valley. He wouldn't stop until he was more than halfway across northern Nova Scotia.

Around 6:30 a.m., videos taken along a country road 50 kilometres from Portapique show the mock-RCMP cruiser with a distinctive black push bar heading to the home of Sean McLeod and Alanna Jenkins, who worked as managers at federal penitentiaries.

Sean and Alanna were father and stepmother to two daughters, who say their parents loved to host friends and their home on Hunter Road was always welcoming.

WATCH | Amielia McLeod says her dad and stepmom were loving, welcomed everyone:


"I wouldn't be who I am without him, like I grew up going fishing, hunting, like he taught me everything. They were really caring, selfless, loving, fun," said Sean's daughter Amielia McLeod.

The family does not know why the killer targeted them that morning or what he did during the three hours he spent at their home.

Police believe he killed the couple and their two dogs shortly after he arrived. Before he left, he set the house on fire and neighbours say in a matter of minutes, flames engulfed the wall of windows that faced the Wallace River where Sean and Alanna loved to spend their days floating.

In the early hours of April 19, 2020, the gunman travelled north from Portapique, taking the lone highway into the Wentworth Valley. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

In the early hours of April 19, 2020, the gunman travelled north from Portapique, taking the lone highway into the Wentworth Valley. (Steve Lawrence/CBC) 

The gunman also killed Tom Bagley close to the deck of the home where McLeod and Jenkins lived. Bagley was a retired former firefighter who was out for a walk.

Surveillance videos captured Wortman's car leaving Hunter Road at 9:23 a.m., driving faster than he had hours earlier. On the highway heading south from Wentworth, the gunman killed another stranger, Lillian Campbell, who was out walking.

By now, the information released to the public via Twitter by the RCMP was still that there was an active shooter in Portapique, and residents in that area should stay inside with their doors locked.

It was during these hours that the gunman's spouse emerged from hiding in Portapique, and the RCMP realized their suspect may not be where they thought he was. Around 9 a.m., the RCMP began to receive frantic calls from Wentworth.

When RCMP officers arrived on Hunter Road sometime after 10 a.m., the shooter was long gone — continuing his killing spree close to the warehouse where he'd spent the night.

Sunday: 9:59 a.m.

About 40 kilometres from Portapique in Onslow Mountain, Nick Beaton was making breakfast for his two-year-old son. His wife, Kristen, had just left for work.

She worked for the Victorian Order of Nurses, travelling around Nova Scotia taking care of those who needed her. She was a continuing care assistant and during the COVID-19 pandemic, she was especially tired — she was pregnant and had a small child at home.

"She was going to work early in the morning you know six, seven in the morning whatever it was, and [before she left] she came in and gave me a big kiss and a big hug and she said, 'Baby you're the best,'" Nick Beaton said.

"Little did I know that would be the last kiss I'd have."

Nick Beaton said he and his wife, Kristen, shown her during her first pregnancy, had a perfect life with their young son. She had just found out she was pregnant with their second child when she was killed. (Nick Beaton/Facebook)

Nick Beaton said he and his wife, Kristen, shown her during her first pregnancy, had a perfect life with their young son. She had just found out she was pregnant with their second child when she was killed. (Nick Beaton/Facebook)  

Meanwhile, in nearby Masstown, Heather O'Brien was also getting ready for the day; the nurse, who worked for the same organization as Beaton, was hoping to spend her day off working on her garden. Before she got started, the mother of eight wanted to check in on her family.

Earlier that morning, O'Brien's daughter Darcy Dobson was awoken by her husband with heartbreaking news: their friends Greg and Jamie Blair had been shot and killed in Portapique. Her husband was Jamie's cousin; their sons played hockey together.

"At that point, we weren't sure what had happened [in Portapique]," Dobson said. "I got up at 5:30, made a cup of coffee and called my mom."

Knowing her family was shaken by that news, O'Brien offered to swing by with a round of coffees for her children and smiles for her 12 grandchildren. They all lived in a loop in Colchester County, close enough that O'Brien could stop in for visits and the drinks would still be delivered hot.

"She knew we were all kind of a little bit on edge about what was happening in Portapique," Dobson told The Fifth Estate."More than anything she just kinda wanted to see us, make sure everybody was OK."

At this point, the only information the O'Brien family had was that something was happening in Portapique and police were still there, so she didn't think much of leaving her house more than 20 kilometres away from the scene.

As she drove, she called a fellow nurse who lived on the opposite side of Portapique. Since there was only one rural highway for her friend to travel — the road that went through Portapique — and the RCMP had part of it blocked off, O'Brien wanted to make sure her coworker could still make it to her appointments.

Heather O'Brien was mother to eight and loved spending time with her 12 grandchildren. (Submitted by Darcy Dobson)

Heather O'Brien was mother to eight and loved spending time with her 12 grandchildren. (Submitted by Darcy Dobson)  

Little did O'Brien know the gunman was heading her way, and she was about to run into him on Plains Road in Debert.

She never made it to the coffee shop.

Not far away, after Kristen Beaton left for work, her husband Nick was texting her updates of what was happening in Portapique.

"I'm thinking that ... it was like an isolated incident, that him and family got into it," he said. “Not thinking that he's out targeting innocent people."

The Beatons weren't worried, but were still being careful.

They chatted while she was pulled over on the side of Plains Road, waiting for her next visit. As they spoke, Nick cautioned her not to stop for anyone.

By this time, the RCMP had tweeted the name and a photo of their suspect.

"I just said, 'OK, I'm gonna go to his Facebook to find his picture and send it to you just in case you see him to avoid him,' or what have you," Nick Beaton said.

The photo was a smiling man in a ball cap. It was the last text Kristen Beaton read. The man in the photo came across Beaton as she was pulled over on the side of the road.

At that very same time, Heather O'Brien was heading down the same road, talking to her colleague on the phone. She saw what she thought was an RCMP car.

This RCMP handout photo shows the gunman's car driving through Debert at 10 a.m. on the morning of April 19. (RCMP)

This RCMP handout photo shows the gunman's car driving through Debert at 10 a.m. on the morning of April 19. (RCMP)  

At 9:59 a.m., O'Brien heard gunshots. She sent a text message to her kids in their family group chat:

RCMP.

Shots fired Debert.

It was likely the gunfire that killed Kristen Beaton.

"The coworker asked her where she was, and she said the RCMP was there and at that point she had screamed," said Dobson.

The line dropped. Her friend frantically dialled 911.

"I think she probably felt safe [seeing the] RCMP car," Dobson said. "If there's shots being fired in Debert, like at least the cops are here."

O'Brien was killed by the gunman just a few hundred metres from Kristen Beaton.

When O'Brien and Beaton left their homes Sunday morning, they and their families weren't aware that the gunman had fled Portapique — or even that the situation was ongoing.

A memorial for Kristen Beaton sits at the side of Plains Road in Debert, where she was killed. (Steve Lawrence/CBC)

A memorial for Kristen Beaton sits at the side of Plains Road in Debert, where she was killed. (Steve Lawrence/CBC) 

"It would have been after mom was killed that they posted he was [nearby]," O'Brien's daughter Darcy Dobson said. "It was after she was killed that they posted he was in an RCMP car."

About 15 minutes after O'Brien and Beaton were killed, Nova Scotia RCMP tweeted their suspect could be dressed as a Mountie driving a vehicle that was all but identical to an actual cruiser. It was 15 minutes too late for the two women. And it was nearly 12 hours after the RCMP received that information.

"The [RCMP] had an opportunity to stop him before the people who died on the 19th were killed," said Dobson. "They failed to give the public the information they needed to stay safe."

"I've gone over and over and over again they didn't release that he was dressed as an officer," Nick Beaton said.

He is adamant if they knew that information, his wife would be by his side today.

"If the RCMP had've armed us with the information of who he was and what they knew by 11 o'clock Saturday night ... she wouldn't have even been on the road," he said.

"Me and many other blue nosers in Nova Scotia were sitting on their front deck with their firearms protecting their family. And she'd have been behind me, she'd have been safe."

In all, the RCMP would release 10 tweets over the 13-hour rampage — releasing new tweets as they received information and sightings of the gunman as he traversed Nova Scotia.

Sunday: 10:49 a.m.

As the RCMP were frantically trying to track down their suspect, Const. Chad Morrison waited in his squad car to meet a colleague. By then, police knew the gunman was on the move.

He and Const. Heidi Stevenson both worked out of Enfield, an hour's drive from Portapique, and had been called to Colchester County to help set up roadblocks. They agreed to meet at an intersection about 50 kilometres from Debert.

According to court documents, Morrison pulled up to an approaching police car in Shubenacadie thinking it was Stevenson there to meet him. It wasn't.

The gunman pulled out a handgun and started firing at Morrison. He was shot in the arm, and managed to drive away — frantically pressing the emergency alarm in his car as he sped off.

The gunman’s mock cruiser was finally stopped when he collided with Const. Heidi Stevenson. The silver SUV was driven by Joey Webber, who was killed by the gunman when he pulled over to help. (Submitted by Rob Pineo)

The gunman’s mock cruiser was finally stopped when he collided with Const. Heidi Stevenson. The silver SUV was driven by Joey Webber, who was killed by the gunman when he pulled over to help. (Submitted by Rob Pineo) 

Meanwhile, less than 500 metres from where he struck Morrison, the gunman spotted Stevenson. He turned to intercept her, veering both cars into the guardrails of the ramp onto Highway 2 where they collided.

They exchanged gunfire and Stevenson, a 23-year member of the force and mother of two, was killed. The RCMP say Stevenson died a hero, sacrificing her life to protect the people of Nova Scotia.

The gunman then killed Joey Webber, who stopped to help after seeing the two crashed cruisers. The 36-year old father of two had been en route to buy furnace oil, and like the many other victims was unaware of any danger nearby.

The shooter stole Stevenson's police-issue pistol and lit the cruisers on fire before taking off in Webber's SUV.

Sunday: 11:26 a.m.

Half an hour later, police finally stopped their suspect at a busy gas station not far from Halifax's international airport.

He was driving a car stolen from his final victim, Gina Goulet. After fleeing from where the two cruisers burned, Wortman killed Goulet in her nearby home.

WATCH | Darcy Dobson says RCMP "failed" at providing information to keep public safe:


Goulet was a denturist who had twice battled cancer. She loved salsa dancing and fishing. Her beloved German Shepherd was shot but the dog survived.

When the gunman stole her car, the gas tank was almost empty. He soon headed to one of the area's busiest gas stations.

But as fate would have it, a member of the Emergency Response Team who was en route to try and stop the gunman had also pulled into the Big Stop in Enfield to get gas.

The RCMP officer recognized Wortman, and the gunman was shot and killed. Police later found five guns in his vehicle.

At 11:26 a.m on Sunday, 13 hours after it began, the rampage had ended.

The aftermath

In the months since the tragedy, the RCMP has offered few answers for families or the public. The force held five media conferences, the last in early June. Media organizations, including the CBC, have gone to court to try to gain access to search warrant documents.

In the early days after the shooting, RCMP said they had no files on Wortman. But police documents obtained by the CBC reveal the 51-year-old wasn't a stranger to police.

He was convicted of assaulting a teen in 2001 and investigated for threatening his parents in 2010.

The following year, Truro police received a tip that Wortman was mentally unstable, had firearms and threatened to kill a cop. In 2013, a neighbour in Portapique reported to police that Wortman was abusive towards his partner and had illegal weapons. None of these incidents resulted in charges and it's unclear to what extent police investigated.

"How in the hell is he not a red flag?" said Heather O'Brien's daughter Darcy Dobson. "It seems to me that a wealthy man with charisma got away with doing whatever the hell he wanted."

In the months since losing his wife, Nick Beaton has embarked on his own investigation, trying to piece together information about the shooter and what happened over those 13 hours.

"I tried to sit back so I could heal, so I could deal with it, and I can't," he said. "I need answers. There's too many questions, there's too many things not answered."

WATCH | Nick Beaton says "if RCMP had armed us with the information they had ... she'd have been safe":


 

In a meeting with investigators, he asked the Mounties to explain how they reached the conclusion that their suspect was dead.

"They couldn't answer it, they were going to look into it and get back to me," Beaton told The Fifth Estate. "I haven't heard nothing yet, it's been months.

"I can lay here and bawl the rest of my life, which I know Kristen wouldn't want, or fight."

Beaton is one of the named plaintiffs in the proposed class-action lawsuit against Wortman's estate. The families are also suing the RCMP and the province.

"We just want answers, we want the truth, full transparency," he said. "We want the RCMP to say we messed up, we made mistakes here, here and here we're learning from it and it's not going to happen again.

"It wasn't the men and women officers that day that I'm upset at, it's the force in general, it's the top brass, it's the people making the decisions."

He and other family members grew frustrated over the summer as calls for a public inquiry went unanswered.

On the same day Beaton and Dobson led a march of family members to the Bible Hill RCMP detachment in support of an inquiry, they learned the federal and provincial justice ministers would announce an independent review, but not the public inquiry they asked for.

Family and friends of victims, including Sean McLeod's daughters, Taylor Andrews, left, and Amielia McLeod, attend a march demanding an inquiry into the April mass shooting in Nova Scotia that killed 22 people, in Bible Hill, N.S., on July 22, 2020. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)

Family and friends of victims, including Sean McLeod's daughters, Taylor Andrews, left, and Amielia McLeod, attend a march demanding an inquiry into the April mass shooting in Nova Scotia that killed 22 people, in Bible Hill, N.S., on July 22, 2020. (Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press)  

Public outcry was swift and harsh, and within a week, federal Public Safety Minister Bill Blair backtracked and said an inquiry would go ahead. In October — days after the six-month anniversary of their loved ones deaths — family members finally got a timeline.

"I have often said this, if it was myself or one of my sisters, my brother, or my dad, [my mother] would have done everything I have done and more," Dobson said. She knows her mother would have settled for "nothing less than the truth."

"She would have demanded it, she'd have been worse than me," she said. "Everybody says you know, I am out there — and I am loud ... they would have been scared if she walked in the doors of that RCMP station because she wouldn't have taken no for an answer on anything."

The inquiry's final report is due by Nov. 1, 2022. Until then, families are left to grieve their loved ones without fully understanding how they came to lose them so violently.

"I know as much now as I knew in April or May," Tyler Blair said. "It's disgraceful.... We shouldn't have to fight and beg for answers."

With his parents gone, Blair now cares for his younger brothers and is running the family business. Although he and his father had talked about him taking it on eventually, it wasn't meant to happen this soon, this way.

"I'm just doing what I should do — what my father would want me to do."

With files from Linda Guerriero and Gillian Findlay

If you are seeking mental health support during this time, here are resources available to Canadians.

If you have a tip about this or any other story, contact elizabeth.mcmillan@cbc.ca or lisa.mayor@cbc.ca

 

 

 
 

RE My questions for Ron Paul, Lew Rockwell and their old buddy Jeffrey Tucker

$
0
0

 ---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 10:32:36 -0400
Subject: RE My questions for Ron Paul, Lew Rockwell and their old
buddy Jeffrey Tucker
To: rockwell@mises.org
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

OUT OF THE GATE I MUST ASK DO YOU DUDES EVEN REMEMBER ME?

https://mises.org/library/your-questions-ron-paul-and-lew-rockwell

 


Your Questions for Ron Paul and Lew Rockwell

8,629 views
Oct 3, 2018
127K subscribers
A special Question-and-Answer period at the Mises Institute's 2018 Supporters Summit in Auburn, Alabama. Recorded on September 28, 2018. Emceed by Mark Thornton.

 

Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.
Founder and Chairman

Tags Big GovernmentCronyism and CorporatismThe FedFree
MarketsStrategyThe Police StateU.S. EconomyWar and Foreign PolicyGold
StandardPolitical Theory

Works Published inThe Free MarketThe AustrianSpeeches and
PresentationsMises Daily Article
Contact Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr.Twitter

(334) 321-2100

 

 https://www.scribd.com/doc/79027777/Ron-Paul-McCain-and-Obama-Etc

 

August 17th, 2007

Andrew Frey
1675 West Broadway
New York, New York
10019-5820
Phone 212 506-2635

Ron Paul
3461 Washington Blvd. Suite 200
Arlington, Virginia 22201
Phone 703 248-9115

Mike Gravel
PO Box 948,
Arlington, Virginia
22216-0948
Phone 703 652-4698

Tony Merchant
83 St. Paul Ouest
Montréal, Québec H2Y 1Z1
Phone 866 982 7777

RE: Public Corruption

Hey Fellas

Remember me? I am the guy with no name worth mentioning or who even does not deserve a call back. EH? That said here is the hard copy of the material you must have forgot that I promised to send your way.

Out of the gate I must ask you dudes the same question I asked Eddy Greenspan, Mr. Frey's pal and many others over the years. After bragging so much about your sense of ethics and deeds in order to catch people's attention in order to solicit their vote or to hire you for your legal prowess, why did you dudes choose to play dumb with me?

If you do not support the public corruption that you have made a fine living within, the common courtesy of calling me back to ask a few legitimate questions about our common concerns and to stress test my integrity would have went a very long way towards convincing me that you were the honest men I have been seeking for years. A little effort on your part to try to understand what I was trying to share with you would have saved me the time and expense of putting you over a barrel and busting ya in front of my peers, the common folk you claim to respect.

The lawyers, Frey and Merchant do not even have to respond. I suspect they know that they should wait to see if summons to court comes from me first before deciding how to appear ethical. N'est Pas?

I already understand their game quite well. If they doubt me they should mention my name to their pals, Patrick Fitzgerald and Eddy Greenspan or any other lawyer named within these documents. In my humble opinion the dumb Maritimer in me played all those very snobby
lawyers like fiddle. I have enough angles on the Lord Conrad Black matter to embarrass everybody involved. Tis time for the political animal in me to pounce and growl a bit to see if haughty Lord Conrad Black is ready and willing to ignore his lawyers and listen to me in order to try to not going to jail like the dumb Martha Stewart and Frank Quattrone did years ago.. If the Hollinger executives were truly wise and acting for the best benefit of their shareholders, they would reconsider everybody's doings in the matter, particularly the lawyers. I received Eddy Greenspan s comical answer yesterday thus Andy Frey his associate in the defence of the Dark Lord of the media, Conrad Black as well as a lawyer suing the nasty old snob gets my stuff just as I promised. Don't say you don't know who I am Andy Baby, I caught you peeking at my blog. Remember?

The same holds true for you Tony Merchant you as a lawyer and your wife as a Canadian Senator. I have made certain that you both have known who I am for over three goddamned years now. If you have any doubts about my tenacity in the pursuit of Justice ask your wife to give the elusive Stevey Boy Harper or the crook Jean T. Fournier a call and tell them I said Hoka Hey and seek their so called Ethical Counsel. Quite Frankly, it is hightime for everybody to shit or get off the pot.

As for the two Yankee politicians I have sent this stuff to, I am still somewhat confused by both of you. You both say largely the right things about the sad state of Yankee affairs of state. However the word of Ron Paul don't ring true because as a seated congressman from Texas of Georgey Boy Bush's ilk he has had lots of opportunity to speak up in Congress just like Jim Traficant had the balls to do not too long ago. You double talk far too much to suit me which is no surprise for a politician to do but your motives truly escape me To put it simply, Ron Paul I have come to understand that you are just another bullshitter. Feel free to prove me wrong. In truth I would welcome it and quickly apologize.

On the other hand Mike Gravel you do seem to be a very straight up dude. The fact that the corporate controlled media is trying hard to ignore you just like they did with me speaks well of the sincerity of your efforts. I love it when you tell the media dudes in no uncertain terms what you think of them. The facts about what you did with the Pentagon Papers many years ago speak volumes about your integrity anyway. You could have easily rested on your laurels as an honest politician who did the right thing. The fact that you suddenly burst upon the scene and speak plainly about awful truths adds to my respect of you. Your age alone dictates that you do not have much to gain other than securing your proper place in history someday as a very rare ethical politician indeed. My hat is off to you sir. I mean you no disrespect but I have some doubts because the words of your assistants to me on the phone. If you truly mean what you say why don't you call me back personally rather than allow your assistants to continue to piss me off? You may not know a thing about me and I truly hope that is true. However from this point in time forward you can never say that you did not know that I exist and I try hard to impeach Georgey Boy Bush all by myself. If you are the man I certainly hope you are methinks it is high time for you to just mention my name in a pubic forum after you checked hard copy of some of my work. Failing that just crawl back under the rock that you said you hid under for years after you spoken of all the other things you know for a fact to be true for the benefit of the rest of us. You claim that government should be run by the people. Why not let them decide who is a lair and who is not and how the political cards should fall? Please just ask the people who do listen to you to check my work posted on the internet (davidamos.blogspot.com or under the user name DavidRaymondAmos in YouTube) and let them decide for themselves whether I am crazy or not. After all I did run for public office in the Maritimes four times in the past three years and I have sued more lawyers than anybody else I have ever heard of and yet nobody has ever dared to sue me let alone even say my name. That fact alone makes my name worth repeating. Read on before any of you dare to call me a liar. What I just spoke of is merely the tip of the very malevolent iceberg. As you listen to the CD of a copy of the Yankee police surveillance tape # 139 and read my letters to Georgey Boy Bush lawyers shouldn't somebody ask Alberto Gonzales what he has thought about all the illegal wiretap tapes I have had in my possession for many years?

Pursuant to my phone calls and emails please find enclosed the material that I promised to send to you before we may meet in a court someday. The list of the material and a brief explanation as to why I am providing it to you is listed as follows:

I have attached directly to this letter copies of three letters of mine, two to me one from the US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and the other from Senator John MaCain. The is the letter from me that I am certain the Barack Obama used to become the keynote Speaker in Beantown in July of 2004. Thus far it has gone unanswered just like the one to Hillary Clinton and several others who wanted to be President in 2003. However as you study my documents you will see that Johnny Boy Edwards and Dumb Dennis Kucinich and many of Mitt Romney's underlings certainly answered me over the years. I am very comfortable that my past works stands on its own without further input from me. Sooner or later some of the truth always leaks out. Ask Dick Cheney and his buddies. EH Mr. Frey?

I have also enclosed exactly the same material that Eddy Greenspan and some prominent Canadian Feds just acknowledged that they received before I start filing my first complaint in Canadian courts. I do not feel the need to say much more other than to say I think that you would be wise to study every word I have sent you. And do with your newfound knowledge in the best interest of the public trust place in your chosen professions.

In closing I make no apologies whatsoever for any mistakes I may have made in the wording or the text of this letter. It was written in a great hurry under circumstance that anyone would find hard to believe. There is no denying that I am very pissed off but I have never lost my temper yet and I am of no threat to anyone at despite what some crooked lawyer or cop may wish to claim in order to cover up their own wrongs. I truly hope that any of you or all of you call me back to make some sort of amends.

Veritas Vincit

David Raymond Amos
121 McLaughlin Rd.
Acworth, NH 03607
Phone 506 434 1379
C/o Werner Bock
3345 Route 890
Hillgrove, NB E4Z 5W3

 

 ---------- Original message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:48:28 -0300
 Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S SDNY
 To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov, NesterJ@sec.gov, USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov,
Ministere-Finances@fi.etat.lu, Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov,
vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov,
 "graham@grahamsteele.ca"<graham@grahamsteele.ca>, "jonathan.dean"
 <jonathan.dean@novascotiavision.com>, tucker <tucker@mises.com>,
producer@onsecondthought.tv, dr_taitz@yahoo.com,
drbilldeagle@earthlink.net
 Cc: oig@sec.gov, william.zabel@srz.com, dsheehan@bakerlaw.com,
mhirchfield@bakerlaw.com, ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca"
 <t.j.burke@gnb.ca>, "rick.hancox"<rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "Fred.
 Pretorius"<Fred.Pretorius@gov.yk.ca>, "Dean.Buzza"
 <Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, vanlop1 <vanlop1@parl.gc.ca>,
jwestbrook1@bloomberg.net, nathan.olivarezgiles@latimes.com,
sherine.elmadany@latimes.com, sbodoni@bloomberg.net, "Andrew. Krystal"
 <Andrew.Krystal@rci.rogers.com>, Richard Harris

 <injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
 <oldmaison@yahoo.com>

 What kind of strange game is the US Justice Dept and the SEC playing
 with me now Mr Litt? Rest assured I won't play it and many people know
 that I never would Even though the corporate media won't talk about my
 concerns about your actions,  others certainly do.

 Here is just one example that still exists on the net. Even though
 Danny Boy Fitzgerald hates this mean old Maritimer, at least
 understands the meaning of the term Integrity and detests you people
 more. I am merely wondering how much longer his blog will exist. You
 know why EH T.J. Burke?

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/search?q=amos

 You dudes know as well as I that my concerns are far greater that mere
 matters of money and Bernie Madoff. Perhaps you should talk to your
 associates in the RCMP and the INTERPOL ASAP Clearly I am trying hard
 to make the whole world know about my concerns about the Feds' severe
 lack of integrity EH H. David Kotz?

 Veritas Vincit
 David Raymond Amos

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: USANYS-MADOFF <USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov>
 Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:40:12 -0400
 Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

 -----Original Message-----
 From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
 Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 9:21 AM
 To: David Amos; USANYS-MADOFF; Litt, Marc (USANYS)
 Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
 Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY

 Thank you for your response.

 Wendy Olsen
 Victim Witness Coordinator

 -----Original Message-----
 From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM
 To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS)
 Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov
 Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY

 Ms Olsen

 Thank you for keeping me informed.

 Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and
 make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full
 disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule
 of Law within a purported democracy.

 As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing
 wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to
 privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to
 protect their butts from impreacment,  litigation and prosecution.

 The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well
 aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when
 the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff
 pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions
 was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been
 trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a
 secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of
 poeple and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people
 are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did
 beginning over seven years ago..

 Veritas Vincit
 David Raymond Amos
 506 756 8687

 P.S. For the record  Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as
 soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last
 night.

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
 ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull

 Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It
 is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing
 timing  They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud,
 forgery, perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal
 wiretappping  and Murder amongst other very serious crimes.

 "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos
 and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison."

 He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that
 Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only
 acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some
 Putnam insiders.

 Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency
 is in hot water again.

 Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying
 private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact
 investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you
 enter the private sector," Scannell said."

 --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:

 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
OFFICE SDNY
 To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald.com, "oig"
 <oig@sec.gov>, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com,
ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald"<danf@danf.net>
 Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com,
mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com,
david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com,
benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts.gov, bob_burke@ao.uscourts.gov
 Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM

 Need I say BULLSHIT?

http://www.bostonherald.com/business/general/view.bg?articleid=1162354&f
 ormat=&page=2&listingType=biz#articleFull


 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300
 Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S
 OFFICE SDNY
 To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com,
ninkster@navigantconsulting.com, dgolub@sgtlaw.com
 Cc: firstselectmanffld@town.fairfield.ct.us,
editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras
 <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:40:55 -0300
 Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 To: gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us, MartiK1 <MartiK1@parl.gc.ca>,
 "Paul. Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>, Jason Keenan
 <jason.keenan@icann.org>, Kandalaw <Kandalaw@mindspring.com>
 Cc: info@grahamdefense.org, fbinhct@leo.gov

 From: "Peck,Dave"<DPeck@town.fairfield.ct.us>
 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:32:32 -0400
 Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT
 INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

 I will be unavailable until 4/1/09.

 Deputy Chief MacNamara will be in charge while I am away.

 He can be reached at 254-4831 or email him at
gmacnamara@town.fairfield.ct.us

 I will not be checking emails or cell phone messages.

 Thank you,

 Chief Dave Peck

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:32:18 -0300
 Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 To: dpeck@town.fairfield.ct.us, edit@ctpost.com, bresee@courant.com

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:19:35 -0300
 Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF FW: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US
 ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY
 To: dtnews@telegraph.co.uk

 -----Original Message-----
 From: USANYS-MADOFF
 Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 3:06 PM
 To: DAVID.RAYMOND.AMOS@GMAIL.COM
 Subject: IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY

 In United States v. Bernard L. Madoff, 09 Cr. 213 (DC), the Court
 received a request from NBC and ABC to unseal all correspondence from
 victims that has been submitted in connection with the case.  This
 includes your email to the Government.  If the correspondence from
 victims is unsealed, the victim's personal identifying information
 including name, address, telephone number and email address (to the
 extent it was included on the correspondence) will become public. The
 Government must submit a response to the request by NBC and ABC by
 Tuesday, March 31, 2009.  Please let us know whether you consent to
 the full disclosure of your correspondence, or whether you wish to
 have your correspondence remain sealed for privacy or other reasons.
 If you wish to have your correspondence remain sealed, please let us
 know the reason.  We will defend your privacy to the extent that we
 can.  Thank you.

 I looks like the US attorney in New York finally has to unseal my
 emails that you dudes have been sitting on for quite some time for no
 reason I will ever understand other than you are just a bunch of
 chickenshits.

 I know NBC, ABC, your blogger buddies or any other media wacko will
 never say my name but the pissed off folks that lost a lot of money
 with Bernie Baby just may ask how the hell I am EH?

 Veritas Vincit
 David Raymond Amos




 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:48:50 -0300
 Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
 KPMG etc  may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
 To: Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:29:42 -0300
 Subject: Fwd: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
 KPMG etc  may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
 To: PChavkin@mintz.com
 Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)"<Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov>
 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:08:04 -0400
 Subject: RE: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
 KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me
 To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

     On March 10, 2009, the Honorable Denny Chin provided the following
 guidance for victims who wish to be heard at the plea proceeding on
 March 12, 2009 at 10:00 a.m.:

      Judge Chin stated that there are two issues that the Court will
 consider at the hearing: (1) whether to accept a guilty plea from the
 defendant to the eleven-count Criminal Information filed by the
 Government, which provides for a maximum sentence of 150 years'
 imprisonment; and (2) whether the defendant should be remanded or
 released on conditions of bail, if the Court accepts a guilty plea.
 Judge Chin also stated that, at the hearing on March 12, 2009, he will
 conduct a plea allocution of the defendant and then will announce
 whether the Court intends to accept the plea.  At that time, the Court
 will solicit speakers who disagree with the Court's intended ruling.

     Assuming the defendant pleads guilty and his plea is accepted by the
 Court, the Court intends to allow the Government and defense counsel
 to speak on the issue of bail.  The Court will then announce its
 intended ruling on that issue.  The Court will then invite individuals
 who disagree with the proposed ruling on bail to be heard.

     The Court noted that there will be opportunity for victims to be
 heard in the future on the subjects of sentencing, forfeiture and
 restitution in advance of any sentencing of the defendant.  The Court
 also noted that it is not appropriate for victims who wish to speak
 concerning sentencing issues to be heard at the March 12, 2009
 proceeding.

     A link to the a transcript of the March 10, 2009 Court hearing can
 be
 found on the website of the United States Attorney's Office for the
 Southern District of New York:

http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/nys


 -----Original Message-----
 From: Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
 Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:56 AM
 To: usanys.madoff@usdoj.gov
 Subject: FW: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and
 KPMG etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me


 -----Original Message-----
 From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
 Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:58 PM
 To: horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com; Nardoza, Robert (USANYE);
 USAMA-Media (USAMA); Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)
 Cc: oig
 Subject: Trust that whatever covert deal that Bernie Madoff and KPMG
 etc may make with the Feds they are not fooling mean old me

horwitzd@dicksteinshapiro.com

 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
 From: "Sartory, Thomas J."<TSartory@goulstonstorrs.com>
 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:41:20 -0500
 Subject: RE: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
 discuss         Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails
 To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

 Dear Mr. Amos,

         I am General Counsel at Goulston & Storrs.  Your email below to
 Messers. Rosensweig and Reisch has been forwarded to me for response.
 While it's not clear what type of assistance, if any, you seek from
 Goulston % Storrs, please be advised that we are not in a  position to
 help you.  Please do not send further communications to any of our
 attorneys.  We will not be able to respond, and your communications
 will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege.

         We wish you well in the pursuit of your concerns.

 Sincerely,

 Thomas J. Sartory




 -----Original Message-----
 From: David Amos [mailto:
 Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 8:18 PM
 To: Rosensweig, Richard J.; info@LAtaxlawyers.com; Reisch, Alan M.;
reed@hbsslaw.com
 Subject: Fwd: I did talk the lawyers Golub and Flumenbaum tried to
 discuss Bernie Madoff and KPMG etc before sending these emails

 Perhaps somebody should call me back now. EH?

 

American Institute for Economic Research

PO Box 1000 Great Barrington MA 01230-1000

  • E-mail: info@aier.org
  • Telephone: 888-528-1216 (Toll-Free)
  • Fax: 413-528-0103
  • www.aier.org

Press and other media outlets please contact 888-528-1216, ext. 3117.

 

 https://www.aier.org/article/why-dont-things-work-anymore/

– March 9, 2020

I enjoyed being on the show Full Measure to discuss government regulations on gas cans and other things like showers, toilets, dishwashers, hot water heaters, and so on. My first writings on this topic are from Bourbon for Breakfast and I’ve been writing about the issue of regulations on domestic appliances ever since.

I hope you enjoy the video below. Here is the full text of the appearance that reaches and estimated 43 million viewers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbSH2o8G7ww&feature=emb_title


Innovation Nation | Full Measure

1,516 views
Mar 9, 2020
From toilets to shower heads to light bulbs.. does it seem like some things don’t work as well as they used to? Jeffrey Tucker of the American Institute for Economic Research says you’re not imagining it. He tells us the reason why— starting with today’s gas cans with a design mandated by the federal government
 
Full Measure is a weekly Sunday news program focusing on investigative, original and accountability reporting. The host is Sharyl Attkisson, five-time Emmy Award winner and recipient of the Edward R. Murrow award for investigative reporting. She is backed by a team of award winning journalists. Each week, we have a cover story that explores untouchable topics in a fearless way including: immigration, terrorism, government waste, national security and whistleblower reports on government and corporate abuse and misdeeds. 
 
 Full Measure is broadcast to 43 million households in 79 markets on 162 Sinclair Broadcast Group stations, including ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX, CW, MyTV, Univision and Telemundo affiliates. It also streams live Sunday mornings at 9:30 a.m. ET. 
 
Read more about us at: http://fullmeasure.news/about 
Find out where to watch us at: http://fullmeasure.news/about Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FullMeasureNews 

 

 

Editorial Director

Jeffrey A. Tucker is Editorial Director for the American Institute for Economic Research.

He is the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and popular press and nine books in 5 languages, most recently Liberty or Lockdown. He is also the editor of The Best of Mises. He speaks widely on topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture.

Jeffrey is available for speaking and interviews via his emailTw | FB | LinkedIn

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:10:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Lockdown: The New Totalitarianism by
Jeffrey A. Tucker
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<

mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Houpt, Simon"<SHoupt@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 14:10:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE Lockdown: The New Totalitarianism by
Jeffrey A. Tucker
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

?
I will be out of the office until Monday, Jan. 4, 2021, checking
emails only on occasion. If this is urgent and you have my cellphone
#, please text me, though I cannot guarantee I will be able to get
back to you swiftly. If this is a Sports-related query that can't wait
until my return, you may wish to contact Deputy Sports Editor Jamie
Ross (jross@globeandmail.com).



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 10:08:14 -0400
Subject: RE Lockdown: The New Totalitarianism by Jeffrey A. Tucker
To: jeffrey.a.tucker@gmail.com, jim@jimbovard.com, jbovard@his.com,
james.caton@ndsu.edu, fiona.harrigan@gmail.com, sandyjfs@yahoo.com,
cbreashears@stlawu.edu, robertericwright@gmail.com,
alexander.w.salter@ttu.edu, eyang@studentsforliberty.org,
donjbx@gmail.com, bcarson@hsc.edu
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, press@aier.org, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, editor <editor@wikileaks.org>,
"Ian.Shugart"<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, nspector@globeandmail.ca,
ombudsman@washpost.com, shenderson600@freepress.com,
shine@foxnews.com, shoupt@globeandmail.ca

https://www.aier.org/article/lockdown-the-new-totalitarianism/

https://www.aier.org/staffs/jeffrey-tucker/

Jeffrey A. Tucker is Editorial Director for the American Institute for
Economic Research.

He is the author of many thousands of articles in the scholarly and
popular press and nine books in 5 languages, most recently Liberty or
Lockdown. He is also the editor of The Best of Mises. He speaks widely
on topics of economics, technology, social philosophy, and culture.

Jeffrey is available for speaking and interviews via his email.  Tw |
FB | LinkedIn


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:22:48 -0400
Subject: RE Fifteen Signs You’re in an Abusive Relationship with the Government
To: lou.eastman@aier.org, Amelia.Janaskie@aier.org, Micha.Gartz@aier.org
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

https://www.aier.org/article/fifteen-signs-youre-in-an-abusive-relationship-with-the-government/


Fifteen Signs You’re in an Abusive Relationship with the Government
Lucio Saverio-Eastman Micha Gartz
– December 31, 2020

---------- Original message ----------
From: noreply@wisconsin.gov
Date: 25 Dec 2020 00:14:48 -0600
Subject: Your message has been received
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for contacting my office. I appreciate hearing your
thoughts, concerns and ideas.

If you are reaching out to my office about COVID-19, you can find the
most accurate, current information about the status of COVID-19 in
Wisconsin at the Wisconsin Department of Health Services’ website
(https://www.dhs.wisconsin.gov/covid-19/index.htm). As governor, it is
my top priority to ensure folks across our state have access to the
most up-to-date information available so you have the resources you
need to make informed decisions to keep yourself, your family, and our
neighbors and communities safe.

The best way to prevent illness is to avoid being exposed to this
virus. Please follow guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), current as of April 16, 2020, to help take
preventative steps that will limit your exposure and protect yourself
from COVID-19:
•       Stay home as much as possible and avoid close contact with others
•       Wear a cloth face covering that covers your nose and mouth in public settings
•       Clean and disinfect frequently touched objects and surfaces
•       Wash your hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds,
especially after going to the bathroom; before eating; and after
blowing your nose, coughing, or sneezing.
o       If soap and water are not readily available, use an alcohol-based
hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol. Always wash your hands with
soap and water if they are visibly dirty.
o       For information about handwashing, see the CDC’s Handwashing website.
o       For information specific to healthcare providers, see the CDC’s Hand
Hygiene in Healthcare Settings.
•       Stay home if you are sick, except to get medical care.
My office receives thousands of letters, emails, and phone calls every
day, but I want you to know that we are working on responding to your
message.

Again, thank you for contacting my office. It is an honor to serve you
and to represent the people of our state.

Tony Evers
Governor


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Gonski, Sarah R. (Perkins Coie)"<SGonski@perkinscoie.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:14:55 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your
office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I am out of the virtual office until Monday, December 28 and my
response to your email will be delayed. If you need immediate
assistance, please contact my assistant at dgraziano@perkinscoie.com
or 602-351-8078 and he will connect you with another member of the
Political Law Group.

Thank you,
Sarah



________________________________

NOTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other
confidential information. If you have received it in error, please
advise the sender by reply email and immediately delete the message
and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank
you.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Press <Press@usdoj.gov>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:16:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply:  Press@usdoj.gov
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Department of Justice's Office of Public
Affairs.  Inquiries sent to this mailbox are no longer monitored.

To submit an inquiry, please visit
www.justice.gov/media<http://www.justice.gov/media>.  Inquiries made
via this form will be checked every 30 minutes from 9:00am – 6:00pm,
Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.

To submit an RSVP for an event, please visit
www.justice.gov/MediaRSVP<http://www.justice.gov/MediaRSVP>.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 06:18:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your
office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2020 02:14:39 -0400
Subject: Fwd: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in
Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
To: afoster@az.gov, bwjohnson@swlaw.com, cahler@swlaw.com,
dflint@swlaw.com, ijoyce@swlaw.com, governorsoffice@michigan.gov,
ccarr@law.ga.gov, dnessel@michigan.gov, kenneth.paxton@oag.texas.gov,
EversInfo@wisconsin.gov, attorneygeneral@doj.nh.gov,
kauljl@doj.state.wi.us, press@usdoj.gov, stateofcorruptionnh1
<stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com>, DSakowich@hearst.com, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "ed.pilkington"
<ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk>, editor <editor@wikileaks.org>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
"andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>,
attorneygeneral <attorneygeneral@ontario.ca>, awilder@azleg.gov,
MarkFinchem@me.com, NBarto@azleg.gov, ADanneman@perkinscoie.com,
SGonski@perkinscoie.com, MElias@perkinscoie.com,
BSpiva@perkinscoie.com, JDevaney@perkinscoie.com,
JGeise@perkinscoie.com, LHill@perkinscoie.com,
HerreraR@ballardspahr.com, ArellanoD@ballardspahr.com,
kellyjtownsend@yahoo.com, liddyt@mcao.maricopa.gov,
craigere@mcao.maricopa.gov, vigilj@mcao.maricopa.gov,
brancoj@mcao.maricopa.gov, laruej@mcao.maricopa.gov,
ca-civilmailbox@mcao.maricopa.gov, rdesai@cblawyers.com,
agaona@cblawyers.com, kyost@cblawyers.com, jnelson@susmangodfrey.com,
smorrissey@susmangodfrey.com, sshackelford@susmangodfrey.com,
dbrook@susmangodfrey.com, michael.c.herron@dartmouth.edu,
jrodden@stanford.edu, sda@gov.harvard.edu, king-assist@iq.harvard.edu,
King@harvard.edu
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
1AP.admin@protonmail.com, govcorrespcrm@pa.gov,
jshapiro@attorneygeneral.gov, Alexander.Kolodin@kolodinlaw.com,
CViskovic@kolodinlaw.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 16:27:43 -0400
Subject: Fwd: ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in
Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
To: sidney@federalappeals.com, howard@kleinhendler.com,
lwood@fightback.law, attorneystefanielambert@gmail.com,
eldridge@millercanfield.com, dshare@bsdd.com,
erosenberg@lawyerscommittee.org, jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org,
grille@michigan.gov, dbressack@finkbressack.com, aap43@hotmail.com,
megurewitz@gmail.com, James@jamesfetzer.com, info@lionelmedia.com,
liveneedtoknow@gmail.com, tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com,
press@deepcapture.com, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, Norman
Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "ron.klain"
<ron.klain@revolution.com>, bgaier@finance-commerce.com,
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca,
info@thomasmoresociety.org, info@rleighfrostlaw.com,
cferrara@thomasmoresociety.org, kaardal@mklaw.com,
mjnew@nationalreview.com, info@aul.org, pr@cato.org, "robert.frater"
<robert.frater@justice.gc.ca>, keith.ward@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen"
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, cxiong@startribune.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:07:58 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:08:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:11:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
filings
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.

Below is a true copy of my latest email It was sent today to Sidney
 Powell byway of her webpage format The lawyers found below will get
 regular email just like I have done with you people (I already called
 them all and spoke to some and left messages with the rest)


Perhaps all you lawyers should check my work from years ago and call
me back  ASAP???

https://www.scribd.com/doc/265620671/Cross-Border-Txt


On 12/13/20, Pam Stavropoulos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
> Thank you David!
>
> Really appreciate wide dissemination of these concerns as you clearly
> recognise.
>
> Regards,
>
> Pam S.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Raymond Amos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au>
> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2020 2:16 PM
> To: pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au
> Subject: Contact Form submission from
> http://pamstavropoulos.com.au/contact/
>
> Sender's name: David Raymond Amos
> E-mail: David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com
> Phone: 506 434 8433
>
> Message: ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 23:14:01 -0400
> Subject: ATTN Yanis Varoufakis and Pam Stavropoulos I just tweeted about
> your concerns about Julian Assange and global economy etc
> To: y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
> Cc: motomaniac333
>
> Yanis Varoufakis
> Web Site:
>     https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu
> Email:
>     y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
> Address:
>     Parliament Mansion (Megaro Voulis), GR10021
> Athens / Tel. +30 2103707568 / Fax +30 2103707570.
>
> Check out the attachment for USA litigation over 18 years ago
>
>
> Please notice that the webcasts and transcripts of this hearing went
> missing not long  before the economy crashed in 2008 Find the letter
> fom Spitzer to me on page 12 within the document I offer as
> "Integrity-Yea-Right" and ask yourself why Assaage has never metioned
> me In fact I bet that you folks won't either
>
> https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
>
>  Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
> Mutual Fund Industry
>
> Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003
>
> Witness Panel 1
>
>     Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>     Director - Division of Enforcement
>     Securities and Exchange Commission
>           Cutler - November 20, 2003
>     Mr. Robert Glauber
>     Chairman and CEO
>     National Association of Securities Dealers
>           Glauber - November 20, 2003
>     Eliot Spitzer
>     Attorney General
>     State of New York
>           Spitzer - November 20, 2003
>
>
>
> Yanis Varoufakis
> @yanisvaroufakis
> ·
>
> Law and Disorder: The case of Julian Assange - DiEM25
> The conviction of Julian Assange would signify a new dystopian
> landscape in which all investigative journalism risks prosecution.
> diem25.org
>
> David Raymond Amos
> @DavidRaymondAm1
> ·
> 1h
> Perhaps you and I should have a long talk ASAP?
>
> FYI this old pdf file is the tip of the iceberg of things that Bolton
> and Assange have known about yours truly for many years
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>
> David Raymond Amos
> @DavidRaymondAm1
> ·
> 41m
> The first link I offer in the blog Greece is among the many that
> received hundreds of documents byway of registered US Mail as I
> returned home to run for public office 6 more times while suing the
> Queen
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>
> Notice Assange and Trumps lawyer's email before they became famous?
>
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>
> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
> first email I ever sent you
> To: David Amos
>
> dear Dave
> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
> find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime
>
> thank you for bearing with me
> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>
> with oceans of joy
> birgitta
>
> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
> not.
>
> Andre Gide
>
> Birgitta Jonsdottir
> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
> http://this.is/birgittahttp://joyb.blogspot.com -
> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>
>>>> From: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>>
>>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>>
>>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>>
>>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>>
>>>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> To: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G"Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
>>>> something
>>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>>
>>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>
>>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>>
>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Dear David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>>> office.
>>>>
>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
>>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>>
>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>>
>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>>
>>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>>> waits attendance.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
>>>> Hafnarstræti 15
>>>> 101 Reykjavík
>>>> Iceland
>>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
>>>> +354-540-3600
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>
> Wednesday, 2 August 2017
>
> Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting
> with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the United Nations,
> This was the pdf file attached to the email found below
>
> https://www.scribd.com/document/332928056/UN-DUDES
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "MAY, Theresa"theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32
> 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador
> to the United Nations,
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> If your email is to the Prime Minister, please re-send to the No 10
> website:
> www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>
> http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>
>
> If you are a constituent of the Prime Minister, please re-send to:
> sharkeyj@parliament.uk
>
> UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
> recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
> copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
> but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
> transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
> encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:16 +0000
> Subject: RE: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki
> Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the
> United Nations,
> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
> Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
> "CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management" , news-tips , lionel
> Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
> elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
> oldmaison , andre
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Michael Cohen
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
> called and left a message for you
> To: David Amos
>
> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
> directed to 646-853-0114.
> ________________________________
> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
> electronic signature under applicable law.
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
>
> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
> Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
> T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
> To: David Amos
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Kevin Leahy
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos
>
> French will follow
>
> Thank you for your email.
>
> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Merci pour votre courriel.
>
> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>
>
> Kevin Leahy
> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
> T 613-996-5048
> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
> erreur et supprimez-le.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:33 +0000
Subject: RE: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Póstur FOR
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000
Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received

Kveðja / Best regards
Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office

---------- Original message ----------
From: "B English (MIN)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:29 +0000
Subject: Automated response from the office of Hon Bill English
To: David Amos

Thank you for your email to the Prime Minister.

This is an automated response.

Please be assured that any matters you raise in your email will be
noted; however, not all messages will receive an individual response.

Yours sincerely
The Office of the Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: PmInvites
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:50 +0000
Subject: PM Invites
To: David Amos

Thank you for your invitation/meeting request to the Prime Minister,
the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP.
Your invitation will be considered in light of the Prime Minister's
existing commitments.
We will be in touch with you as soon as possible to formally advise
the progress of your invitation/meeting request.

Yours sincerely

Prime Minister's Office

______________________________________________________________________

IMPORTANT: This message, and any attachments to it, contains information
that is confidential and may also be the subject of legal professional or
other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
must not review, copy, disseminate or disclose its contents to any other
party or take action in reliance of any material contained within it. If you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return email informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of the
message from your computer system.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Turnbull, Malcolm (MP)"
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President
Donald J. Trump I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen
(646-853-0114) Why does he lie to me after all this time???
To: David Amos

***Please be advised that this email address is no longer in use***

Thank you for taking the time to write to me. Feedback from the people
we represent is always extremely valuable for members of parliament,
and especially valuable to me as Prime Minister.

However as you can imagine I receive a very large, sometimes
dauntingly large, amount of correspondence and it is important that we
do everything we can to respond to it as quickly and effectively as
possible.

So to help us best direct your enquiry and respond to it, please
complete this contact form. If you have written a detailed message in
your email, just cut and paste it into the contact form and complete
the details requested.

If you would like to invite me or Lucy to an event, please forward the
invitation to pminvites@pmc.gov.au.

If you are a Wentworth constituent, please make us aware of this and
my electorate office team in Edgecliff will be in touch.

Regards,

Malcolm Turnbull
Prime Minister


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
does he lie to me after all this time???
To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
"CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management" , news-tips , lionel
Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
oldmaison , andre


> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
> andre@jafaust.com>
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>> ilian.html
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>
>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>
>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>> cards?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>> 6
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>
>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>
>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>>
>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>
>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>
>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>
>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>
>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>
>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>
>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>
>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>
>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>
>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>
>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>
>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>
>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>
>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>> Defendant
>>>>
>>>> ORDER
>>>>
>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>
>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>
>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>>> he stated:
>>>>
>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>
>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>> Police.
>>>>
>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>
>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>> Judge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>
>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>
>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>> most
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>
>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>> Thank you,
>>>>
>>>> Merci ,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>
>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>
>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>
>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>
>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>
>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>
>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>
>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>
>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>
>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>
>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>
>>>> Subject:
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>
>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>
>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>
>>>> CM/cb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>
>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>
>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>
>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>
>>>>  Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>> The Supreme Court
>>>
>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>
>>> Amos v. Canada
>>> Court (s) Database
>>>
>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>> Date
>>>
>>> 2017-10-30
>>> Neutral citation
>>>
>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>> File numbers
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>
>>> THE COURT
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Date: 20171030
>>>
>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>> CORAM:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>> and
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>
>>> I.                    Introduction
>>>
>>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>
>>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>
>>>
>>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>
>>>
>>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal.
>>>
>>>
>>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>>
>>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>
>>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>> c. F-7:
>>>
>>>
>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>> Appeal.
>>> […]
>>>
>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>> […]
>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>
>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>> section.
>>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>> that:
>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>
>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>
>>>
>>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>> appeal book.
>>>
>>>
>>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>
>>>
>>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>
>>>
>>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>
>>>
>>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>
>>>
>>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias:
>>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>
>>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>> (4th) 193).
>>>
>>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>
>>>
>>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>
>>>
>>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>
>>>
>>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>
>>>
>>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>> (emphasis added)
>>>
>>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>
>>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>
>>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>
>>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>
>>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>> to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>
>>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>
>>>
>>> III.               Issue
>>>
>>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>
>>> IV.              Analysis
>>>
>>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>>
>>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>
>>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>> interfere.
>>>
>>>
>>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>
>>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>
>>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>> (…)
>>>
>>>
>>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>
>>>
>>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>> para. 27).
>>>
>>>
>>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>
>>>
>>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>
>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>
>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>
>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>
>>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>
>>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>
>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>> of process…
>>>
>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>
>>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>
>>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>
>>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>
>>> V.                 Conclusion
>>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>> without leave to amend.
>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>> J.A.
>>> "David G. Near"
>>> J.A.
>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>> J.A.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>
>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>> DOCKET:
>>>
>>> A-48-16
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> Fredericton,
>>> New Brunswick
>>>
>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>
>>> May 24, 2017
>>>
>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>
>>> WEBB J.A.
>>> NEAR J.A.
>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>
>>> DATED:
>>>
>>> October 30, 2017
>>>
>>> APPEARANCES:
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>
>>> Jan Jensen
>>>
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>
>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>
>>>
>

SIDNEY POWELL
Sidney Powell, P.C.
2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 300
Dallas, Texas 75219
(517) 763-7499
sidney@federalappeals.com



HOWARD KLEINHENDLER
Counsel of Record
Howard Kleinhendler Esquire
369 Lexington Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(917) 793-1188
howard@kleinhendler.com


L. LIN WOOD
L. LIN WOOD, P.C.
P.O. Box 52584
Atlanta, GA 30305-0584
(404) 891-1402
lwood@fightback.law

Of Counsel
JULIA Z. HALLER
BRANDON JOHNSON
EMILY P. NEWMAN


SIDNEY POWELL
STEFANIE LAMBERT JUNTTILA
Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Petitioners
500 Griswold Street, Suite 2340
Detroit, MI 48226
(248) 270-6689
attorneystefanielambert@gmail.com

SCOTT R. ELDRIDGE
Attorney at Law
Miller, Canfield,
One Michigan Avenue
Suite 900
Lansing, MI 48933-1609
517-483-4918
Email: eldridge@millercanfield.com

DANIEL M. SHARE
EUGENE DRIKER
STEPHEN E. GLAZEK
Attorney at Law
Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLC
333 West Fort Street; 12th Floor
Detroit, MI 48226
313-965-9725
Email: dshare@bsdd.com

EZRA D. ROSENBERG
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
1500 K Street, NW; Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
202-662-8345
Email: erosenberg@lawyerscommittee.org

JON GREENBAUM
Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
District Of Columbia
1500 K Street NW
Ste 9th Floor
Washington, DC 20005
202-662-8315
Email: jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org

ERIK A. GRILL
HEATHER S. MEINGAST
Michigan Department of Attorney General
Civil Litigation, Employment & Elections Division
PO Box 30736
Lansing, MI 48909
517-335-7659
Email: grille@michigan.gov

DARRYL BRESSACK
DAVID H. FINK and NATHAN J. FINK
Attorneys as Law
38500 Woodward Avenue; Suite 350
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
248-971-2500
Email: dbressack@finkbressack.com

ANDREW A. PATERSON, JR.
Attorney at Law
46350 Grand River Ave.
Novi, MI 48374
248 568-9712
Email: aap43@hotmail.com

MARY ELLEN GUREWITZ
Attorney at Law
Cummings & Cummings Law PLLC
423 North Main Street; Suite 200
Royal Oak, MI 48067
313-204-6979
Email: megurewitz@gmail.com

THOMAS MORE SOCIETY
309 W. Washington Street
Suite 1250
Chicago, IL 60606
ph: 312.782.1680
f: 312.782.1887



“Personal prejudice and financial greed are the two great evils that
threaten courts of law, and once they get the upper hand they
immediately hamstring society, by destroying all justice.”
― Thomas More, Utopia.”

Michael McHale, Counsel

Michael McHale received a B.A. in Journalism and History from the
University of Nebraska-Lincoln with high distinction in 2009, and a
J.D. from the University of Nebraska College of Law with distinction
in 2012. Prior to joining TMS, Michael served as general counsel and
policy analyst for the Nebraska Catholic Conference, where he
testified before several committees of the Nebraska Legislature
defending the constitutionality of school vouchers, tax-credit
scholarships, and Nebraska’s parental consent statute for
abortion-seeking minors. From 2018 to 2019, he clerked for the
Honorable L. Steven Grasz on the United States Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit.

Michael is a Blackstone Legal Fellow with Alliance Defending Freedom.
His writings on the
rights to life and religious freedom have appeared in the Witherspoon
Institute’s online journal, Public Discourse, along with the Omaha
World-Herald and the Lincoln Journal Star. He has also completed
pre-theology studies as a seminarian at St. Gregory the Great
Seminary, where he studied philosophy and natural law.

Biography of Michael McHale, Counsel

Biography of Christopher Ferrara, Special Counsel


Christopher Ferrara is a Roman Catholic attorney, pro-life activist,
and journalist. He founded the American Catholic Lawyers Association
in 1990. He joined the Thomas More Society in 2020, and concentrates
his legal work on pro-life defense, religious liberty cases, unjust
laws that attack Catholic institutions, and that infringe on parental
rights. Mr. Ferrara graduated from Fordham Law in 1977 and practices
out of a satellite office in the New York metropolitan area. Mr.
Ferrara is a widely published author on Catholic Church affairs. Mr.
Ferrara is married and has six children.


CHRISTOPHER A. FERRARA, ESQ.
(Bar No. 51198)
148-29 Cross Island Parkway
Whitestone, Queens, New York 11357
Telephone: (718) 357-1040  973 703 0907
cferrara@thomasmoresociety.org
Special Counsel to the Thomas More Society


https://minnlawyer.com/2020/11/25/republicans-sue-to-stop-wisconsin-vote-certification/

Bill Gaier      President and Publisher         612-584-1537

Republicans sue to stop Wisconsin vote certification

By: The Associated Press        November 25, 2020       

MADISON, Wis. — Republicans filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking the
Wisconsin Supreme Court to block certification of the presidential
election results even as a recount over President-elect Joe Biden’s
win over President Donald Trump is ongoing.

The lawsuit echoes many of the same arguments Trump is making in
trying, unsuccessfully, to have tens of thousands of ballots
discounted during the recount. It also seeks to give the power to name
presidential electors to the Republican-controlled Legislature.

Wisconsin state law allows the political parties to pick electors,
which was done in October. Once the election results are certified,
which is scheduled to be done Dec. 1, those pre-determined electors
will cast their ballots for the winner on Dec. 14.

“The litigation filed this afternoon seeks to disenfranchise every
Wisconsinite who voted in this year’s presidential election,” said
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul. “The Wisconsin Department of
Justice will ensure that Wisconsin’s presidential electors are
selected based on the will of the more than 3 million Wisconsin voters
who cast a ballot.”

The lawsuit also rehashes a claim that a federal court rejected in
September that Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg tried to “illegally
circumvent Wisconsin absentee voting laws” through grants awarded by a
nonprofit center he funds.

At least 10 cases have been filed across the country seeking to halt
certification in parts or all of key battleground states, including
lawsuits brought by the Trump campaign in Michigan and Pennsylvania.
So far none have been successful.

The Wisconsin lawsuit was filed by attorney Erick Kaardal, a former
Minnesota Republican Party official who also represented rapper Kanye
West in his unsuccessful lawsuit attempting to get on the ballot in
Wisconsin. Kaardal represents a conservative group called the
Wisconsin Voters Alliance and a host of Republican voters.

Kaardal also filed an unsuccessful federal lawsuit in Wisconsin that
attempted to block $6.3 million from being awarded to five heavily
Democratic cities from the nonprofit Center for Technology and Civic
Life, which is primarily funded by Zuckerberg and his wife. A judge
tossed the lawsuit that argued the money amounted to bribery to
bolster Democratic turnout in Green Bay, Kenosha, Madison, Milwaukee
and Racine.

Many of the same arguments alleging the money was illegally awarded
and therefore the election results should be nullified are being made
in the new lawsuit in state court.

Other claims mirror those by Trump’s campaign.  Those claims allege
absentee ballots should not have been counted where election officials
filled in missing information on the certification envelope that
contains the ballot and that voters who identified as “indefinitely
confined” were lying to avoid the state’s photo ID law.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission advises clerks that they can fill
in missing information on the ballot envelopes, such as the address of
a witness. That’s been the practice for years, and it’s never been
challenged.

Biden won Wisconsin by 20,608 votes, but the lawsuit claims that more
than 156,000 ballots should be tossed out.

info@thomasmoresociety.org

Federal Court Says New York Governor Cuomo is Wrong to Limit Worship Services
Governor Cuomo and Mayor DeBlasio

(Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is wrong to limit worship services yet
condone mass protests, according to a federal judge. After telling
Thomas More Society attorneys in a June 18, 2020 hearing that he was
“troubled by” the government’s responses, Senior U.S. District Judge
Gary L. Sharpe issued a preliminary injunction on June 26, 2020,
prohibiting Governor Cuomo, his Attorney General Letitia James, and
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio from ordering or enforcing COVID-19
prompted restrictions on outdoor religious worship gatherings.
Christopher Ferrara

“This decision is an important step toward inhibiting the suddenly
emerging trend of exercising absolute monarchy on pretext of public
health. What this kind of regime really meant in practice is freedom
for me, but not for thee,” said Thomas More Society Special Counsel
Christopher Ferrara.

Thomas More Society Special Counsel Christopher Ferrara remarked, “We
are pleased that Judge Sharpe was able to see through the sham of
Governor Cuomo’s ‘Social Distancing Protocol’ which went right out the
window as soon as he and Mayor de Blasio saw a mass protest movement
they favored taking to the streets by the thousands. Suddenly, the
limit on ‘mass gatherings’ was no longer necessary to ‘save lives.’
Yet they were continuing to ban high school graduations and other
outdoor gatherings exceeding a mere 25 people. This decision is an
important step toward inhibiting the suddenly emerging trend of
exercising absolute monarchy on pretext of public health. What this
kind of regime really meant in practice is freedom for me, but not for
thee.”

Sharpe’s order noted that, “it is not the judiciary’s role to second
guess the likes of Governor Cuomo or Mayor de Blasio when it comes to
decisions they make in such troubling times, that is, until those
decisions result in the curtailment of fundamental rights without
compelling justification.”

In awarding the injunction, the court noted that “nonessential
businesses” that enjoy a 50% capacity limitation are not justifiably
different than houses of worship.

Sharpe remarked that offices, retails stores, salons, and restaurants
– all now permitted to open at 50% capacity indoors – all involve the
congregation of people for a length of time. He stated, “These secular
businesses/activities threaten defendants’ interest in slowing the
spread of COVID-19 to a similar or greater degree than those of
plaintiffs’, and demonstrate that the 25% indoor capacity limitation
on houses of worship is underinclusive and triggers strict scrutiny
review.”

The judge pointed out, “Another case of individualized exemption seems
even more obvious.” Governor Cuomo has now specifically authorized
outdoor, in-person graduation ceremonies of no more than 150 people.
This is an express exemption from the ten- or twenty-five-person
outdoor limits that apply to other situations. Yet, “There is nothing
materially different about a graduation ceremony and a religious
gathering such that defendants’ justifications for a difference in
treatment can be found compelling.”

Sharpe took New York City to task, stating that de Blasio’s
simultaneous pro-protest/anti-religious gathering messages “clearly
undermine the legitimacy” of his argument that selective enforcement
of the challenged laws with respect to mass race protests is a matter
of public safety.

“Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio could have just as easily
discouraged protests, short of condemning their message, in the name
of public health and exercised discretion to suspend enforcement for
public safety reasons instead of encouraging what they knew was a
flagrant disregard of the outdoor limits and social distancing rules,”
wrote Sharpe. “They could have also been silent. But by acting as they
did, Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio sent a clear message that mass
protests are deserving of preferential treatment.”

As a result of the federal order, Governor Cuomo, Attorney General
James, and Mayor de Blasio are “enjoined and restrained from enforcing
any indoor gathering limitations” against the involved houses of
worship “greater than imposed for Phase 2 industries,” provided that
participants follow the prescribed social distancing. They are also
forbidden from “enforcing any limitation for outdoor gatherings
provided that participants in such gatherings follow social distancing
requirements as set forth in the applicable executive orders and
guidance.”

Cuomo, James, and de Blasio were sued by two Catholic priests from
upstate New York and a trio of Orthodox Jewish congregants from
Brooklyn for violations of their civil rights by prejudicial orders
and selective enforcement. The federal lawsuit, filed June 10, 2020,
in United States District Court for the Northern District of New York,
charged the governor, attorney general, and mayor with violating the
plaintiffs’ rights to free exercise of religion, freedom of speech,
assembly and expressive association, and due process, under the First
and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Governor Cuomo was
also accused of violating New York state law and the New York State
Constitution.

Ferrara explained the lawsuit: “In an unprecedented abuse of power,
Governor Cuomo and Mayor de Blasio have exploited the COVID-19
pandemic to create, over the past three months, a veritable
dictatorship by means of a complex web of executive orders. The orders
have imposed and selectively enforced ‘social distancing’ under a
‘lockdown’ of virtually every aspect of life for New York state
residents on the pretext of ‘public health,’ but with numerous
exceptions. The permissible activities, not based on the science of
viral contagion, but rather determined according to personal value
judgments, have included mass demonstrations of thousands of people –
gatherings of which the governor and mayor have approved and the mayor
participated in. Cuomo and de Blasio, along with James, have enforced
the gubernatorial ‘lockdown’ by threat of criminal prosecution and
actual prosecution, including $1,000 fines for the recently created
offense of violating Cuomo’s ‘Social Distancing Protocol’.”

Ferrara added, “These mass protest gatherings, taking place during the
COVID-19 stay-at-home lockdown orders, have been not only allowed but
praised by both the governor of New York and mayor of New York City,
even though massive property damage and death have resulted. This,
when the government’s primary purpose is to protect the people it
governs.”

Read United States District Court for the Northern District of New
York Judge Gary L. Sharpe’s Memorandum-Decision and Order, issued June
26, 2020, in response to the Thomas More Society’s complaint, filed on
behalf of Rev. Steven Soos, Rev. Nicholas Stamos, Daniel Schonbrun,
Elchanan Perr, and Mayer Mayerfeld, in Rev. Steven Soos, et al v.
Andrew M. Cuomo, et al, here.


https://minnlawyer.com/2020/08/14/minnesota-churches-join-legal-challenges-to-virus-rules/

Minnesota churches join legal challenges to virus rules

By: The Associated Press        August 14, 2020

Churches in Minnesota and California, backed by a conservative legal
group, filed lawsuits this week against the governors of their states
challenging restrictions imposed due to the coronavirus outbreak that
they contend are violations of religious liberty.

They’re the latest in a long series of legal challenges, many of them
in California, pitting clerics and houses of worship who believe they
should be exempt from certain restrictions on public gatherings
against governors who insist the measures are needed to rein in the
pandemic. Most of the suits have been rebuffed; some have succeeded.

In Minnesota, a lawsuit was filed Thursday in federal court
challenging Gov. Tim Walz’s executive orders requiring 6-foot social
distancing and the wearing of face masks at worship services.

“Gov. Walz, a former teacher, gets an F in religious liberties,” said
Erick Kaardal, special counsel for the Thomas More Society. “Other
states, including Texas, Illinois and Ohio, have excluded churches
from COVID-19 mask mandates.”

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison reiterated his defense of
Walz’s order, saying it was legally and constitutionally sound.

Teddy Tschann, spokesperson for Walz, said the governor was within his
authority taking the action and added that all Walz’s actions have
been grounded in the desire to keep Minnesotans safe.

Walz had been embroiled in a battle with Roman Catholic and Lutheran
Church-Missouri Synod congregations across Minnesota over restrictions
he placed on gatherings of more than 10 people. He relented and said
they could hold services at 25% of capacity if certain conditions were
met after they made it clear they planned to defy the order.

Earlier this month a pastor in Palmetto, Florida, filed a suit
challenging Manatee County’s mask mandate. The Rev. Joel Tillis of
Suncoast Baptist Church said the order shouldn’t extend to houses of
worship because it hinders prayer.

The Thomas More Society, which specializes in litigation on religious
issues, filed a lawsuit Wednesday in California Superior Court against
Gov. Gavin Newsom and other officials. It seeks to prevent the
enforcement of “unconstitutional and onerous coronavirus pandemic
regulations” against Grace Community Church in the Los Angeles
neighborhood of Sun Valley.

The pastor, John MacArthur, has been holding services in recent weeks
attended by throngs of worshippers in defiance of state and county
limits on gatherings.

“We will obey God rather than men,” MacArthur said in a message to his
congregation. “He will be on our side.”

MacArthur was greeted with applause Sunday when he welcomed
worshippers to his church’s “peaceful protest.”

One of the two Thomas More lawyers representing MacArthur and his
church is Jenna Ellis, who also is a senior legal adviser to President
Donald Trump’s reelection campaign.

“California’s edicts demanding an indefinite shutdown have gone now
far past rational or reasonable and are firmly in the territory of
tyranny and discrimination,” Ellis said. “This isn’t about health.
It’s about blatantly targeting churches.”

The lawsuit contends that restrictions on large gatherings should not
be enforced at churches because they were not enforced on large
demonstrations against racism and police brutality.

Officials in California, where COVID-19 cases have been surging in
recent weeks, say strict restrictions remain necessary in Los Angeles
County and other counties that are on a state monitoring list for high
rates of new infections.

Los Angeles County filed a lawsuit against the church Thursday seeking
to have in-door, in-person worship services stopped. The lawsuit also
seeks to have the church comply with health order requirements,
including the use of face covers and physical distancing at outdoor
services.

Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s office referred a request for
comment to Newsom’s office, as the new lawsuit addresses the
governor’s executive order. Spokesmen for Newsom did not immediately
respond to a request for comment.

Across the country the vast majority of churches have cooperated with
health authorities and successfully protected their congregations. Yet
from the earliest phases of the pandemic, and continuing to this day,
some worship services and other religious activities have been
identified as sources of local outbreaks.

A few churches have been openly defiant, including one in California’s
Ventura County which held indoor worship services Sunday despite a
judge’s temporary restraining order.

Pastor Rob McCoy of Godspeak Calvary Chapel in Newbury Park had vowed
to continue in-person services even though the order cited “an
immediate threat to public health and safety.”

On Tuesday a different judge declined a county request to order the
immediate closure of the church, and scheduled a hearing for Aug. 21.

Earlier this year the U.S. Supreme Court upheld state COVID-19
restrictions on religious gatherings in a suit filed by South Bay
United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, California.

Religious plaintiffs have prevailed in some litigation, however. In
June a federal judge blocked New York state from enforcing
restrictions on indoor religious gatherings to 25% capacity when other
types of gatherings were limited to 50%.

The plaintiffs, represented by the Thomas More Society, were two
Catholic priests from Upstate New York and three Orthodox Jewish
congregants from Brooklyn. They argued that the restrictions violated
their First Amendment rights to practice their religion.

The society also claimed a victory in May when Illinois Gov. J.B.
Pritzker withdrew certain pandemic-related mandates on houses of
worship.

In the new Minnesota case, the plaintiffs were Protestant churches in
the towns of Alexandria, Buffalo and Crosby, along with their pastors.

“Our people are commanded to meet together in fellowship,” Eric
Anderson, pastor of Life Spring Church in Crosby, said at a news
conference Thursday. “They can’t fellowship with masks on their
faces.”

Kaardal, the Thomas Moore lawyer, argued that Walz’s executive order
usurped the legislature’s lawmaking powers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXMQciBKW4g&ab_channel=AnnVandersteel

12-21-20 Guardians of Free Speech; Flynn Family Stands with 1st
Amendment Praetorians
8,941 views
Streamed live on Dec 21, 2020
Ann Vandersteel

1st Amendment Praetorian

Special Guest: Robert Patrick Lewis
https://twitter.com/1st_praetorian?la...
1AP.admin@protonmail.com
https://www.1apraetorian.com/
https://www.1apraetorian.com/donate

Resounding Endorsements!
1. General Flynn Endorsement:  https://twitter.com/GenFlynn/status/1...
2. Joe Flynn Endorsement: https://twitter.com/JosephJFlynn1/sta...
3. Joe Flynn Endorsement : https://twitter.com/JosephJFlynn1/sta...


1AP.admin@protonmail.com

Anni L. Foster (#023643)
General Counsel
Office of Arizona Governor Douglas A. Ducey
1700 West Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Telephone: 602-542-4331
E-Mail: afoster@az.gov

Brett W. Johnson (#021527)
Colin P. Ahler (#023879)
Derek C. Flint (#034392)
Ian R. Joyce (#035806)
SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
One Arizona Center
400 E. Van Buren, Suite 1900
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202
Telephone: 602.382.6000
Facsimile: 602.382.6070
E-Mail: bwjohnson@swlaw.com
cahler@swlaw.com
dflint@swlaw.com
ijoyce@swlaw.com

Attorneys for Defendant Douglas

Brian Kemp
Office of the Governor
206 Washington Street
Suite 203, State Capitol
Atlanta, GA 30334
Tel: (404) 656-1776
Email: governorsoffice@michigan.gov

Christopher M. Carr
Office of the Attorney General
40 Capitol Square, SW
Atlanta, GA 30334
Tel: (404) 458-3600
Email: ccarr@law.ga.gov

Gretchen Whitmer
Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 30013
Lansing, MI 48909
Tel: 517-373-3400
Email: governorsoffice@michigan.gov

Dana Nessel
G. Mennen Williams Building
525 W. Ottawa Street
P.O. Box 30212
Lansing, MI 48909
Tel: 517-373-1110
Email: dnessel@michigan.gov

Ken Paxton
Attorney General of Texas
Brent Webster
First Assistant Attorney
General of Texas
Lawrence Joseph
Special Counsel to the
Attorney General of Texas
Office of the Attorney General
P.O. Box 12548 (MC 059)
Austin, TX 78711-2548
kenneth.paxton@oag.texas.gov
(512) 936-1414

Anthony S. Evers
Office of the Governor
115 East, State Capitol
Madison WI 53702
Tel: (414) 227-4344
Email: EversInfo@wisconsin.gov

Joshua L. Kaul
Wisconsin Department of Justice
17 West Main Street, P.O. Box 7857
Madison, WI 53707-7857
Tel: (608) 287-4202
Email: kauljl@doj.state.wi.us

Tom Wolf
Office of the Governor
508 Main Capitol Building
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Tel: 717-787-2500
Email: govcorrespcrm@pa.gov

Josh Shapiro
Office of Attorney General
Strawberry Square
Harrisburg, PA 17120
Tel.: 717.787.3391
Email: jshapiro@attorneygeneral.gov

Alexander Michael del Rey Kolodin,
AZ Bar No. 030826
Alexander.Kolodin@KolodinLaw.com
Christopher Viskovic,
AZ Bar No. 0358601
CViskovic@KolodinLaw.com
KOLODIN LAW GROUP PLLC
3443 N. Central Ave. Ste. 1009
Phoenix, AZ 85012
Telephone: (602) 730-2985
Facsimile: (602) 801-2539

Andrew Wilder
Director of Communications
Republican Majority Caucus
(602) 926-5299
awilder@azleg.gov

Representative Mark Finchem, LD-11
P.O. Box 69344
Oro Valley, AZ 85737
(520) 808-7340
MarkFinchem@me.com

Nancy K. Barto
5450 East. Deer Valley Dr.
#2196
Phoenix, Arizona 85054
602-926-5766 (office)
480-513-3750 (home)
602-370-8262 (direct)
NBarto@azleg.gov


Alexis E. Danneman (Bar No. 030478)
Sarah R. Gonski (Bar No. 032567)
PERKINS COIE LLP
2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2788
Telephone: (602) 351-8000
Facsimile: (602) 648-7000
ADanneman@perkinscoie.com
SGonski@perkinscoie.com

Marc E. Elias*
Bruce V. Spiva*
John Devaney*
John M. Geise**
PERKINS COIE LLP
700 Thirteenth Street NW, Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20005-3960
Telephone: (202) 654-6200
Facsimile: (202) 654-6211
MElias@perkinscoie.com
BSpiva@perkinscoie.com
JDevaney@perkinscoie.com
JGeise@perkinscoie.com

Laura Hill*
PERKINS COIE LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
Seattle, WA 98101-3099
Telephone: (206) 359-3349
Facsimile: (206) 359-4349
LHill@perkinscoie.com

Roy Herrera (Bar No. 032901)
Daniel A. Arellano (Bar No. 032304)
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
1 East Washington Street, Suite 2300
Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2555
Telephone: 602.798.5400
Facsimile: 602.798.5595
HerreraR@ballardspahr.com
ArellanoD@ballardspahr.com


Senator Kelly Townsend:
a. Senator in the AZ legislature
b. Maricopa County
c. kellyjtownsend@yahoo.com

ALLISTER ADEL
MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY
Thomas P. Liddy (019384)
Emily Craiger (021728)
Joseph I. Vigil (018677)
Joseph J. Branco (031474)
Joseph E. LaRue (031348)
Deputy County Attorneys
liddyt@mcao.maricopa.gov
craigere@mcao.maricopa.gov
vigilj@mcao.maricopa.gov
brancoj@mcao.maricopa.gov
laruej@mcao.maricopa.gov

CIVIL SERVICES DIVISION
225 West Madison Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85003
Telephone (602) 506-8541
Facsimile (602) 506-4317
ca-civilmailbox@mcao.maricopa.gov
Attorneys for Maricopa County Defendants

Roopali H. Desai (024295)
D. Andrew Gaona (028414)
Kristen Yost (034052)
COPPERSMITH BROCKELMAN PLC
2800 North Central Avenue, Suite 1900
Phoenix, AZ 85004
T: (602) 381-5478
rdesai@cblawyers.com
agaona@cblawyers.com
kyost@cblawyers.com

Justin A. Nelson (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1000 Louisiana, Suite 5100
Houston, TX 77002-5096
T: (713) 651-9366
jnelson@susmangodfrey.com

Stephen E. Morrissey (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3800
Seattle, WA 98101-3000
T: (206) 516-3880
smorrissey@susmangodfrey.com

Stephen Shackelford (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1301 Avenue of the Americas, 32nd Floor
New York, NY 10019-6023
T: (212) 336-8330
sshackelford@susmangodfrey.com

Davida Brook (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90067
T: (310) 789-3100
dbrook@susmangodfrey.com

Michael C. Herron
Dartmouth College
Department of Government
6108 Silsby Hall
Hanover, NH 03755-3547
Homepage: http://www.dartmouth.edu/˜herron
Phone: +1 (603) 646-2693
Mobile: +1 (603) 359-9731
Email: michael.c.herron@dartmouth.edu

Jonathan Rodden
Stanford University
Department of Political Science
Encina Hall Central
616 Serra Street
Stanford, CA 94305
Phone: (650) 723-5219
Fax: (650) 723-1808
Email: jrodden@stanford.edu

STEPHEN DANIEL ANSOLABEHERE
Department of Government
Harvard University
1737 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
sda@gov.harvard.edu

Gary King
Institute for Quantitative Social Science
Harvard University
1737 Cambridge Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
GaryKing.org
Direct: (617) 500-7570
King@Harvard.edu
Assistant: (617) 495-9271
king-assist@iq.harvard.edu


Dennis I. Wilenchik Esq.
Lee Miller Esq.
John (Jack) D. Wilenchik Esq.
The Wilenchik & Bartness Building
 2810 North Third Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85004
Phone: (602) 606-2810
jackw@wb-law.com
admin@wb-law.com

https://lawandcrime.com/opinion/supreme-smear-lin-wood-goes-full-q-in-bonkers-tweets-telling-800000-plus-followers-that-chief-justice-roberts-called-trump-a-motherfer-on-a-phone-call/

Supreme Smear: Lin Wood Goes Full Q in Bonkers Tweets Telling
800,000-Plus Followers That Chief Justice Roberts Called Trump a
‘Motherf***er’ on a Phone Call
Matt Naham
Dec 17th, 2020, 5:50 pm





https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/dominion-attorneys-send-brutal-letter-to-trump-campaigns-so-called-star-witness-mellissa-carone/




https://finance.yahoo.com/news/apos-brilliant-lucky-apos-clare-174929103.html

ALM Media

Zack Needles is Global Managing Editor, Regional Brands at ALM. He is
also the Managing Editor of The Legal Intelligencer, Pennsylvania Law
Weekly, Delaware Business Court Insider and Delaware Law Weekly.
Contact him at 215-557-2373 or zneedles@alm.com

https://www.law.com/


'Brilliant and Lucky' Clare Locke Makes Headlines by Keeping Clients Out of Them
November 28, 2018

Libby Locke and Tom Clare of Clare Locke, Washington D.C. (Courtesy photo)

Safeguarding the reputation of prominent clients has long been a
ticket to success in the legal profession, especially in
scandal-plagued Washington, D.C.

It's a skill that's in high demand these days, amid cascading
allegations against powerful media and government figures and
competing claims about who's peddling so-called Fake News—all
supercharged by the #MeToo movement and the polarized politics of the
Trump era.

In other words, it's the perfect environment for Tom Clare and Libby Locke.

The Washington-area husband-and-wife team seems to be everywhere these
days, noted (and sometimes reviled) for their work on behalf of the
unloved and accused. Their Alexandria, Virginia, defamation and
commercial litigation boutique, Clare Locke, hasn't shied away from
the black hat trope put forward by critics who have labeled them
“media assassins.” Instead, their website flaunts their success at
having “killed” stories at prominent publications.

Clare and Locke left the partnership at Kirkland & Ellis and opened
their boutique steps from the Potomac River in 2014, in a Virginian
townhouse with ample roaming room for their dog, Gipper. The pet is
named for either Notre Dame football coach Knute Rockne or former
President Ronald Reagan, depending on whether you believe Clare, a
Fighting Irish alumnus, or Locke, whose favorite president is Reagan.

The duo bristles at the notion that they are hired guns paid to
silence the press. They say the plaintiffs-side defamation work they
do involves three components—pre-publication counseling,
post-publication retraction, and defamation litigation.

“They are worthy adversaries, and they are very good at what they do,”
said Lee Levine, Ballard Spahr senior counsel and a leading First
Amendment attorney defending media clients. “I would describe them as
zealous advocates—and I think it’s fair to say there isn’t an issue in
defamation law in which I agree with them.”

New Media Era

Levine, who is defending The New York Times against a lawsuit brought
by Clare Locke on behalf of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, said he
has known Clare and Locke for several years. He said few lawyers on
the East Coast have been able to establish a practice comparable to
theirs, which he noted is more commonly found closer to Hollywood.

The decision to break away from Kirkland was inevitable in retrospect.
Clare and Locke proffered that positional conflicts, conflicts created
by increasing corporatization of media ownership, and the need to
offer rate flexibility made leaving Big Law a necessity.

They now lead a team of nine lawyers, including five Kirkland expats
and four recruited from other firms and law schools.

"Our firm culture is incredibly important to us, and so we have always
grown in size methodically and deliberately in order to assemble the
right team," they said in an email. "We are looking for lawyers who
share our mission and our passion for this area of the law. Given
those very specialized criteria, we expect to accomplish future growth
by targeted recruiting efforts rather than through a combination with
another firm."

Clare Locke’s timing was “brilliant and lucky, or some combination of
the two,” said Levine, as the burgeoning boutique scored some high
profile wins that drew new clients to its door. The pair scored a
multimillion-dollar victory against Rolling Stone for University of
Virginia associate dean Nicole Eramo regarding false claims made in
the 2014 article “A Rape on Campus.”

The amount of work arriving on their doorstep has only soared since,
which they attribute to the proliferation of cable television channels
and the explosion of social media and online news. They said
competitive pressures combined with shrinking media budgets have made
institutional checks-and-balances such as fact-checking increasingly
scarce.

“The rise in the number of outlets means, not only a rise in the
number of platforms where defamation can occur, but also intense
competition among these outlets to 'be first' in publishing news,”
Clare and Locke said. “The rush to be first leads to more mistakes
(whether intentional or not), more salacious headlines and content to
attract readership, and thus, more false and damaging articles being
published.”

President Donald Trump’s outspoken criticism of the media—alongside
the conduct of what Clare and Locke call “reckless media outlets” such
as Rolling Stone and Gawker (another adversary)—may have emboldened
potential victims previously intimidated into staying silent. And more
recent legal battles, such as CNN’s dispute with the White House
access for Jim Acosta, may have given ammunition to plaintiffs-side
defamation lawyers such as Clare, who argues that, “journalists do not
get a special hall pass to disobey rules of general applicability.”

“The First Amendment is not magical pixie dust that somehow immunizes
people from any sort of scrutiny from the way they behave or the
like,” Clare said of CNN’s dispute on the Lawyer 2 Lawyer podcast.

Clare Locke is litigating against CNN in a different case—on behalf of
a pediatric heart surgeon who filed a defamation suit in Florida. CNN
has fought to keep its editorial standards secret as part of its
defense in the case.

Levine said he thinks the the number of defamation suits brought by
well-financed public figures has risen in recent years, as the
individuals find such litigation to be a useful tool against the
press. He said courts need to “rise to the occasion” and tell
plaintiffs that such tactics will not work, and he compared the legal
landscape for media to the time “in the early 60s," before the U.S.
Supreme Court's unanimous decision in New York Times v. Sullivan
established the actual malice standard.

Clare and Locke aren't sympathetic to the notion that prominent public
figures have an unfair advantage when it comes to protecting their
reputations. They have represented several clients facing
#MeToo-related accusations, including Jeff Fager, the fired executive
producer of CBS’ “60 Minutes,” and reports have linked them to many
more, including The New York Times’ Glenn Thrush; Kimberly Guilfoyle,
formerly of Fox News; and fired NBC anchor Matt Lauer.

In representing such clients, Clare Locke has argued that the playing
field has tilted substantially toward the accusers, and Locke has
pointed to the controversy surrounding Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s
confirmation fight as evidence. The effect of sexual misconduct
allegations against Kavanaugh contradicted the “Victorian notion” that
women are powerless compared to men, Locke argued in The Wall Street
Journal in September.

“The circus this process has become demonstrates not only the power of
#MeToo, but also its potential as a weapon—and how an audience eager
for victim narratives and sinister power dynamics can be galvanized
without proof to shatter a man’s reputation built over a lifetime of
hard work,” Locke wrote of the confirmation fight.

Since Kavanaugh joined the nation’s highest court, clients have only
continued to line up for the firm. In subsequent weeks, Major League
Baseball and Breitbart, a Trump-supporting media outlet, have
reportedly retained Clare Locke. And given the state of politics and
media, there's no sign of a slowdown anytime soon.


https://www.pli.edu/faculty/tom-clare-23968


Tom Clare
Clare Locke LLP
Alexandria, VA, USA

 Biography

Tom is best known for representing high-profile clients who are
targeted in hostile media investigations or the subject of false
statements in the press. He has handled defamation matters for Fortune
500 companies and individuals, including CEOs, hedge-fund managers,
university presidents, professional athletes and sports teams,
celebrities, journalists, and others who find themselves under
reputational attack.

In March 2019, Tom secured a defamation jury verdict for Dr. Fredric
Eshelman based on false statements from Puma Biotechnology, Inc. The
jury awarded $15.85 million in compensatory and $6.5 million in
punitive damages.  He also represented UVA Associate Dean Nicole Eramo
in her defamation lawsuit against Rolling Stone magazine relating to a
highly publicized article of an alleged gang rape. In November 2016, a
jury found the defendants liable for defamation and awarded Ms. Eramo
$3 million.

Prior to founding Clare Locke LLP, Tom was an equity partner at one of
the nation’s premier litigation firms and has more than 20 years of
experience handling high-stakes commercial litigation matters. He is
ranked in the 2020 Chambers USA Guide for nationwide first amendment
litigation and for global defamation/reputation management in the
Chambers HNW directory. Tom is a Super Lawyer for Business Litigation
and Media and Advertising and a BTI Consulting Client-Service All-Star
MVP.

Associated Items
1 item
Date 11/20/2020
Program or Publication
Format  On-Demand
Watch Now
$1,535.00

Communications Law in the Digital Age 2020

13-Hour Program

See Credit Details Below
Overview

The practice of media and communications law demands the ability to
respond to new challenges arising from digital and social media, and
this program will address recent developments in First Amendment,
defamation, privacy, intellectual property, newsgathering, right of
publicity, reporter’s privilege law and more. Join an expert faculty
of law firm practitioners, in-house counsel, government officials, and
academics, and obtain the legal, strategic, and practical guidance
needed to keep current in these areas of law and technology.

What You Will Learn

• Recent developments in electronic media regulation
• First Amendment updates
• Legislative, judicial, and regulatory developments in data
protection and privacy
• Updates on reporter’s privilege and newsgathering liability
• Important intellectual property decisions
• Current issues in right of publicity law
• Recent developments in Section 230, commercial speech, and anti-SLAPP law
• International media law updates

Special Features

Earn one full hour of Ethics credit in an interactive format!




THOMAS A. CLARE, P.C.
tom@clarelocke.com
(202) 628-7401
10 Prince Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(202) 628-7400
www.clarelocke.com

February 21, 2019
By Email and Federal Express Not for Publication or Attribution

Nick Poser
Senior V.P. and Associate General Counsel
CBS Corporation
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
neposer@cbs.com

Bill Owens
Executive Producer, 60 Minutes
CBS Corporation
51 West 52nd Street
New York, NY 10019
owensb@cbsnews.com

Re: 60 Minutes Segment on Opioids

Dear Nick and Bill:

We represent Purdue Pharma L.P. (“Purdue”). I write regarding 60
Minutes’ reporting on
Purdue, specifically with regards to the segment on the U.S. Food and
Drug Administration (“FDA”) and opioid medicines that 60 Minutes is
considering airing this Sunday, February 24, 2019.

Despite multiple meetings, phone calls, and email exchanges between
representatives of Purdue and 60 Minutes Associate Producer Sam
Hornblower (during which detailed information was exchanged), we are
still concerned that Mr. Hornblower and 60 Minutes intend to air a
biased and one-sided segment rife with significant errors and
inaccuracies, and that 60 Minutes will refuse to disclose to its
viewers critical information about the sources it intends to rely on
(and even put on the air), including their personal biases toward
Purdue and their financial incentives in making false and misleading
statements about the company and OxyContin.

With this letter, CBS and 60 Minutes are on notice of the inaccuracies
and errors we
understand may be included in such a segment (and the contradicting
facts demonstrating their falsity) and that 60 Minutes has a duty to
its viewers and to Purdue to make the following disclosures should it
decide to air interviews with or statements from these biased sources.

I. 60 Minutes’ Intended Characterizations and Descriptions of the
Timing and Make-Up of
the FDA’s Initial 1995 Approval of OxyContin and the FDA’s Clarification and
Narrowing of that Approval in 2001 are Inaccurate and Misleading.
Based on meetings, phone calls, and email exchanges with Mr.
Hornblower, we have serious
concerns that he and 60 Minutes will falsely report that (1) in 1995,
the FDA lacked sufficient
evidence to approve OxyContin for distribution, and (2) in 1995, the
FDA did not approve
OxyContin for the treatment of chronic pain, and only in 2001 did the
FDA first broaden its
approval of OxyContin for use in the treatment of patients suffering
from chronic and long-term
pain. These purported statements are demonstrably false and create the
misleading impression that
OxyContin was not initially intended to be used for the treatment of
chronic and long-term pain,
and only after several years of such ‘unapproved use’ did the FDA take
action. In fact, publicly
available information demonstrates that the FDA, in its initial
approval of OxyContin in 1995,
understood that its benefits extended to the treatment of patients
suffering from chronic, long-term
pain, and therefore included that intended and approved use in its
initial approval. Then, six years
later in 2001, the FDA, in light of unexpected widespread abuse of
OxyContin, clarified its safety
warnings to narrow the use of it to patients who are actually
suffering from chronic and long-term
pain (and to eliminate any notion that this important treatment should
be used for any other
purpose).
A. The FDA Approved OxyContin for the Treatment of Chronic and Long-Term
Pain in 1995 Based on Sufficient and Extensive Data and Information.
We understand that 60 Minutes intends to falsely report that the FDA
lacked sufficient
evidence to approve OxyContin in 1995. This is patently false. The FDA
based its approval of
OxyContin on a robust set of clinical trials, which the FDA dubbed at
the time as the “gold standard.”
Though, at the time, only two clinical trials were usually necessary,
Purdue submitted and the FDA
reviewed six controlled clinical studies (involving over 700 patients)
before it approved OxyContin.
Three of these clinical trials were for cancer pain, and one for
osteoarthritis, one for chronic low
back, and one for post-operative pain. The new drug application for
OxyContin consisted of over
40,000 pages in 120 volumes, including 14 pharmacokinetic studies. The
FDA was in possession of
an unprecedented amount of information and evidence demonstrating
OxyContin’s benefits and
effectiveness in treating patients with debilitating pain before it
approved it for use in 1995. Any
statements that imply or suggest that the FDA somehow lacked
sufficient information or evidence
when it made its decision to approve OxyContin in 1995 is false.
In fact, in 2013, when denying a citizen’s petition brought by
Physicians for Responsible
Opioid Prescribing, the FDA stated that “there are numerous
uncontrolled studies that have
evaluated patients on opioids for as long as a year; although some
patients drop out of the studies
over this period of time, many remain on opioid therapy, which may
suggest that they continue to
experience benefits that would warrant the risks of opioid use.” And
even today, the FDA continues
to approve opioids for long-term, chronic pain use and recognizing
that for select patients, opioids
may be the only reasonable and effective therapy for patients seeking
to manage their legitimate
chronic pain.

B. The FDA Expressly Approved OxyContin for Use in the Treatment of Chronic
and Long-Term Pain in 1995, and then Narrowed its Approval to Only Such Use
in 2001.
We understand that 60 Minutes intends to report – inaccurately – that
in 2001, the FDA
broadened the indication for OxyContin to include the treatment of
chronic pain. This is simply
not true; the changes to OxyContin’s label that were required by the
FDA in 2001 narrowed the
patient population for which OxyContin was intended; importantly,
however, it did not add a
chronic pain indication as OxyContin has been approved for chronic
pain since its initial approval
in 1995.
The FDA initially approved OxyContin “for the management of moderate
to severe pain
where use of an opioid analgesic is appropriate for more than a few
days.” The original label (which
is enclosed with highlighted sections noted below for your reference)
included numerous references
to the medicine’s use (and approval) for chronic or long-term pain,
including the following
statements:
“During chronic therapy, especially for non-cancer pain syndromes,
the continued need for around-the-clock opioid therapy should be
reassessed periodically (e.g., every 6 to 12 months) as appropriate.”
“Physical dependence and tolerance are not unusual during chronic
opioid therapy.”
“It should be expected, however, that a fraction of cancer patients will
develop some degree of tolerance and require progressively higher
dosages of OxyContin to maintain pain control during chronic
treatment.”
“Neonates whose mothers have been taking oxycodone chronically
may exhibit respiratory depression and/or withdrawal symptoms,
either at birth and/or in the nursery.”
“The clinical relevance of a difference of this magnitude is low for a
drug intended for chronic usage at individualized dosages, and there
was no male/female difference detected for efficacy or adverse events
in clinical trials.”
“There was no evidence of oxycodone and metabolite accumulation
during 8 months of therapy.”
“There was a significant decrease in acute opioid-related side effects,
except for constipation, during the first several weeks of therapy.”
“Patients should be advised that if they have been receiving treatment
with OxyContin for more than a few weeks and cessation of therapy
is indicated, it may be appropriate to taper the OxyContin dose,rather
than abruptly discontinue it, due to the risk of precipitating
withdrawal symptoms.”
“The intent of the titration period is to establish a patient-specific
q12h dose that will maintain adequate analgesia with acceptable side
effects for as long as pain relief is necessary. Should pain recur then
the dose can be incrementally increased to re-establish pain control.
The method of therapy adjustment outlined above should be
employed to re-establish pain control.”
And, these clearly identified statements on OxyContin’s original label
echo the FDA Medical
Officer’s review of OxyContin when it was first approved:
“[C]ontrolled release oxycodone was studied in an adequate number
of patients to reveal adverse events at the 1 % level.…It showed an
acceptable level of risk associated with its use in the chronic pain
population.”
In July 2001, the FDA, recognizing that OxyContin was being widely
abused, added a black
box warning and narrowed the indication to “the management of moderate
to severe pain when a
continuous, around the clock analgesic is needed for an extended
period of time.” The FDA’s
meeting notes and congressional testimony confirm that the purpose of
the label changes was to add
important safety warnings and limit the use of the medicine only to
appropriate patients with
chronic pain.
In April 2001, the FDA acknowledged in a meeting that:
“The indication of ‘’moderate to severe pain for patients who need to
be on opiates for more than a few days” is broad and may not
adequately reflect the intended population. The label should clearly
state that this drug product should only be used patients who require
opiates for an extended period of time, that it should not be utilized
for first-time treatment of pain, and that it is not for intermittent
use.”
Furthermore, the FDA’s Dr. John Jenkins testified before the Senate in
2002 concerning
this narrowing clarification of the approved uses of OxyContin (while
also acknowledging Purdue’s
participation in that very process):
“In July of last year Purdue Pharma, working in cooperation with
FDA, significantly strengthened the warnings and precautions in the
labeling for OxyContin.…Furthermore, the labeling for OxyContin
now makes clear that it is only approved by FDA for treatment of
moderate to severe pain in patients who require around-the-clock
narcotics for an extended period of time.”
As the record demonstrates, the FDA, based on a mountain of data,
research and evidence,
approved OxyContin for use by patients seeking to manage and treat a
specific type and level of pain(which included chronic, long-term
pain) originally in 1995. Then in 2001, the FDA determined,
in consultation with Purdue, to add a strengthened warning to
OxyContin’s labels narrowing its
approved and intended use to individuals suffering from chronic,
long-term pain. Any statements
by 60 Minutes (or any sources or individuals it intends to interview
or publish statements from)1 in
any forthcoming statement would be demonstrably false and should not
be referenced.
II. 60 Minutes Intends to Include Interviews and Statements from
Sources Who are Biased
Against and Have a Personal and Financial Incentive to Negatively Comment About
Purdue.
As part of its one-sided segment on opioids, we understand that, based
on conversations and
communications with Mr. Hornblower, 60 Minutes has already interviewed
or intends to interview
two individuals who are well-known and vocal critics of Purdue and
OxyContin – Dr. Andrew
Kolodny and former FDA Commissioner David Kessler. Both of these
individuals are not only
inherently biased towards (and vocally critical of) Purdue and
OxyContin, but are also, based on
their paid-for consulting and advising roles for both 60 Minutes and
for plaintiff-side law firms
involved in litigation against Purdue, incapable of providing a
neutral and fair perspective on the
history and current state of opioid prescription use in the United States.
Dr. Kolodny has admitted, in the form of a court-filed expert
disclosure report made under
the penalty of perjury, to the fact that he is a paid consultant and
advisor, earning $725/hour for
his services.2 He also lists on his CV that he submitted to the U.S.
House of Representatives
Committee on Energy and Commerce on February 27, 2018 as part of his
required disclosures prior
to his testimony under oath, that he served in a “CONSULTING AND
ADVISING” role for “CBS
60 Minutes” in 2017 as part of 60 Minutes’ “The Whistleblower”
segment.3 A copy of this expert
disclosure report and Dr. Kolodny’s CV he submitted for his
congressional testimony is enclosed
for your reference. The facts demonstrate that Dr. Kolodny admits that
he worked for 60 Minutes
as a consultant and advisor within the last two years (and on a
segment that touched on substantially
similar subject matter is this segment) and that he is also a paid
consultant on behalf of plaintiffs
currently involved in active litigation with Purdue.
In that same vein and upon information and belief, we understand that
Dr. Kessler has also
performed extensive work for and has long consulted with and on behalf
of plaintiff-side law firms
who are or have been engaged in litigation against Purdue regarding
the very same issues he purports to comment on for 60 Minutes’ planned
segment.4 These types of consulting and advising roles for
law firms involved in active or potential litigation are rarely if
ever performed for free.
It is incumbent upon 60 Minutes, as the ultimate publisher and airer
of segments featuring
biased and conflicted individuals like Dr. Kolodny and Dr. Kessler,5
to thoroughly investigate and
vet its own sources and intended on-screen interviewees to confirm any
such biases and financial
incentives for promoting certain viewpoints and commentary. And where
such biases and financial
or otherwise personal motives to provide one-sided, incomplete, and
even false commentary on a
subject matter such as opioid use in the United States exists (as it
clearly does with Dr. Kolodny and
Dr. Kessler who are, at a minimum, paid-for consultants by individuals
and parties who are currently
suing Purdue), 60 Minutes has a duty to its viewers to clearly and
unambiguously disclose such bias
and the facts supporting their incentive and motivation for their
viewpoints and commentary during
any aired segment in which Dr. Kolodny and Dr. Kessler participate in,
and to confront such bias
head-on.
* * *
60 Minutes obviously has the right to make fair comment on matters of
public concern, and
that certainly extends to reporting on the opioid crisis in a balanced
and fair-minded manner.
However, reporting that includes demonstrably false and otherwise
misleading commentary
regarding the history of the FDA’s thorough approval process for
OxyContin and the clear and
unambiguous warnings and precautions both the FDA and Purdue have
taken over the years to
promote appropriate uses of OxyContin and that relies on the biased
and financially-incentivized
opinions of vocal critics of Purdue is neither fair nor balanced reporting.
Purdue recognizes the significant public health challenge that the
opioid and other addiction
crises pose and the impact they have on families across the U.S.
Purdue understands and has
embraced the importance of addressing this issue head on, both through
direct action and a
balanced and fair national discussion. To that end, Purdue has
submitted earlier today, under
separate cover, an on-the-record statement to 60 Minutes (enclosed for
your reference). We fully
expect that 60 Minutes will include Purdue’s full statement and
otherwise accurately represent
Purdue’s statement in the segment (and in any articles or other
accompanying reporting on the
segment posted online or elsewhere).
We trust that you understand the seriousness of these issues. We
request that you, in your
respective capacities as counsel for CBS and as the Executive Producer
of 60 Minutes, (1) refrain
from making the demonstrably false claims outlined in this letter
on-air in any forthcoming segment
and likewise ensure that the critical and necessary facts detailed
above are fairly and accurately
represented in any segment 60 Minutes may air that references Purdue
or OxyContin, (2) that CBS
and 60 Minutes thoroughly investigate and vet the bias and financial
incentives of any sources it
intends to rely on for any such segment (whether they are
on-background or on-camera interviewees), including Dr. Kolodny and
Dr. Kessler, and to fairly and accurately include in any forthcoming
segment the results of that vetting and investigation in order to
fully disclose to viewers the nature
of any such source’s bias and financial motivation to comment
negatively about Purdue or on the
opioid crisis, and (3) to include Purdue’s full, on-the-record
statement (sent under separate cover)
and to otherwise accurately and fairly represent Purdue’s statement in
any on-air segment or
accompanying reporting (whether published online or elsewhere).
I look forward to your prompt response confirming receipt. I am
available to discuss any
questions you may have on these subjects.


Very truly yours,
Thomas A. Clare, P.C.


CC: Sam Hornblower, Associate Producer, 60 Minutes, hornblowers@cbsnews.com
Enclosures


1 A media defendant can be liable for republishing or participating in
the publication of another’s
false statement if it acted with a reckless disregard for whether the
statement was true or false. Cianci
v. New Times Pub. Co., 639 F.2d 54, 60 (2d Cir. 1980); see also St.
Amant v. Thompson, 390 U.S.
727, 732 (1968) (recklessness may be found “where there are obvious
reasons to doubt the
veracity of the informant or the accuracy of his reports.”).
2 See Dec. 21, 2018 State’s Expert Witness Disclosures, Exhibit J,
Case No. CJ-2017-81.
3 See Feb. 27, 2018 Andrew Kolodny’s “Truth in Testimony” Witness
Disclosure Requirement,
Committee on Energy and Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives.
4 See, e.g., July 27, 2016 Decl. of David Kessler, Case No:
30-2014-00725287-CU-BT-CXC (enclosed
for your reference).
5 See Cianci, 639 F.2d at 60; St. Amant, 390 U.S. at 732.




Tuesday, September 08, 2020
Why is Ridgeback Biotherapeutics Trying to Suppress Adverse Opinions
by Issuing Frivolous Defamation Threats?

Over the past several months, I have posted a number of articles about
the campaign of intimidating copyright demand letters from Mathew
Higbee, who tries to extract money from individuals, nonprofits and
small businesses by threatening to file frivolous copyright lawsuits.
This is the first in what I expect will be series of articles about a
different sort of campaign of frivolous threats: companies that try to
clean up their reputations by hiring lawyers to send frivolous threats
of libel litigation.  I'm not sure which is worse.

Today’s story begins with an article that ran in the Washington Post
back in June, 2020, focusing on the role played by a small Miami-based
pharmaceutical corporation, run by hedge fund managers and called
Ridgeback Biopharmaceutics. The Post noted that Ridgeback had invested
in a potential antiviral therapy, developed at Emory University with
public financing, but that, when it failed to secure federal financing
to develop the drug further, it made a killing by selling its rights
to Merck. These facts, the reporter suggested, illustrate “the
perception that companies are profiteering during a global medical
crisis — especially in cases where inventions were funded by
taxpayers.” The article also tied the situation to the revelations
from BARDA whistleblower Rick Bright, who cited this as one of the
examples of political pressure being applied to secure federal
financing for private profit.

The article quoted a few nongovernmental sources commenting on the
situation, including the executive of a rival biotech firm; Harvard
Medical School Professor Aaron Kesselheim, and Jamie Love, the founder
of Knowledge Ecology International. Both Kesselheim and Love were
quoted as expressing concern that Ridgeback was “flipping” the
medication – Kesselheim said that it was analogous to a house flipper,
while Love said that “'molecule-flipping' is a good characterization
of what it is.” This language was reflected in the headline of the
article: “Hedge fund manager stands to profit on ‘flip’ of
taxpayer-funded coronavirus drug.” Love also noted that it had, in the
past, been unusual to see much engagement by private investors in
medications addressed to Ebola and SARS, which have been “backwater
areas in neglected disease.” But now, he said, private parties were
rushing to invest.

Ridgeback’s Libel Offensive

Ridgeback’s owner, it seems, is the unusual capitalist who finds it
insulting to be accused of having made a quick profit by finding
investment opportunities in an arena long neglected by other
investors. But instead of simply sending a note explaining why it
disagreed, and trying to persuade its critics based on the merits of
the evidence, Ridgeback hired Thomas Clare, a well-known plaintiffs’
libel lawyer, to complain to the Washington Post’s editors and legal
department about the article; the result was that the Post made some
minor changes in the article, described in an editor’s note. Mr. Clare
claims that the Post “agreed” to make these changes (although it is
not clear that there has been any “agreement.”) But the article’s
central point, about molecule- flipping and profiteering, remained
unchanged.

Ridgeback then turned its sights on Jamie Love, sending him a  letter
that warned that the Washington Post had already changed its story in
response to its “concerns”; stated that Love’s “flipping” statement
was “demonstrably false"; and ”demand[ed] that [Love] set the record
straight by immediately retracting your defamatory remarks.” Mr. Clare
made a few factual representations about what his client had done
vis-a-vis the chemical on question. His letter continued by contending
the Love had wrongly used the word “backwater” to denigrate the
African continent as well as China and Hong King, and seeking
retraction of that statement as well (a later letter appears to
suggest that Love’s allegedly calling Africa a backwater was “racist”
-- that accusation could be itself defamatory if it were not so
plainly a baseless opinion; name-calling is generally not defamatory).
To underline the legal peril in which Love had supposedly placed
himself, Mr. Clare dropped a footnote stating that the letter should
be considered a demand for retraction under section 770.02 of the
Florida Statutes. It is my assumption that Mr. Clare was hoping that,
if he could intimidate Love into retracting his use of the term
“flipping,” he could then go back to the Post and ask for further
changes. Interestingly enough, Mr. Clare did not make any complaint to
the Harvard professor who had also been quoted by the Post using the
term “flipping.” It is my assumption that Mr. Clare and his client
figured that the Harvard professor would be very able to defend
himself against a frivolous libel claim, but that Love might be an
softer target.

Love, however, did not back down. Instead, he  wrote back to explain
why he had said what he said, and asking a detailed list of pointed
questions questions, asking as well for documentation of Mr. Clare’s
statements praising his client. For example, he said he could not
assess the accuracy of Ridgeback’s denial of “molecule flipping”
without seeing Ridgeback’s agreements with Emory and with Merck,
outlining the companies’ relative roles in the development of
EIDD-2801, the relevant COVID medication. He also noted that he had
not, as Mr. Clare claimed, said that Africa or Hong Kong is a
backwater – he said that certain diseases have been neglected and thus
have been backwaters for investment. He noted that, instead of
expounding Ridgeback’s role in developing EIDD-2801, Mr. Clare’s
letter was largely devoted to praising his client’s work om mAb114, an
Ebola medication. Apart from noting that this was something of a
tangent from the claim that Ridgeback had been defamed about its COVID
work, Love posed some pointed questions about the relative shares of
government and Ridgeback funding in this work. Love concluded, “if
Ridgeback wants some type of compliment for its efforts in this space,
regarding the risking of its own money, I . . . would need facts and
more than just a letter from a boutique law firm that specializes in
defamation litigation.”

After Love had received no response to these questions, I followed up
Love’s query a few days later with some questions of my own. I told
Mr. Clare that I was working on an article about bullying libel demand
letters, not only asking whether Ridgeback was ready to answer Love’s
questions and provide him with documents, but also pointing out some
reasons to think that Ridgeback could not succeed on a defamation
claim. First of all, Mr. Clare had not so much taken issue with the
veracity of Love’s statements as quoted by the newspaper as with the
context into which the Washington Post had placed the quotations; but
if that was the issue, then Ridgeback’s gripe was with the article and
not with Love. Second, given that Mr. Clare wanted Love to be afraid
of being sued because of Mr. Clare’s kvelling about how the mighty
Washington Post had already backed down, it was remarkable that the
Post story had retained the assertion that Ridgeback was guilty of
flipping. So if Mr. Clare was satisfied with the Post’s clarifications
as he was claiming to be, why was he threatening to sue Love for using
the term? And as for the “backwater” comment, no reasonable person
could read the quotation from Love and think he was characterizing
specific geographical areas as backwaters – he said that certain
diseases were backwaters for investment, and not only is there no
reason to think that what Love said is false, but Emory University
itself has described the project from which its COVID-19 treatment
emerged as being devoted to attacking diseases that are “generally not
profitable enough for industry to pursue, and thus are considered
neglected diseases.”

Moreover, even Love’s “backwater” reference was false, even if it was
not merely an opinion, defamation claims can be asserted only by the
person about whom the defamatory statement was made – how would
Ridgeback have standing to sue for alleged defamation of a continent
or a disease? Plainly, with regard to Love’s use of the term
“backwater,” in this respect, Mr. Clare’s letter is just plain
chest-thumping intended to intimidate both because its sender is a big
macher, and because a longer letter citing additional complaints might
make Love worry more about his potential exposure.

My note to Clare also pointed to the caption on his letter to Love,
"Not for Publication or Attribution."  I was wondering whether, like
an earlier Virginia defamation lawyer, John Dozier, he thought he
could prevent the victims of his bullying from calling public
attention to his demands.  This caption is apparently a common feature
of demand letters from his firm.  See here, here and here.

Ridgeback’s Response to Being Accused of Bullying

Ridgeback responded,  first to me and  then to Love, by repeating its
assertion that it was not molecule flipping, but it stoutly refused to
produce any evidence to support its contentions, and the tone of its
responses was, in a number of respects, considerably milder. Both
letters asserted that Ridgeback has a continuing role in the
development of the COVID medication, but neither letter included any
specific dollar amounts, neither compared the amount of taxpayer
investment with the amount of private investment; and most important
they did not include any of the documentation that Love and I had
requested. They letters seemed, at best, a face-saving maneuver
accompanying Ridgeback’s declaration that it was not going to sue Love
despite his failure to meet the demand for retraction.

The letters contained statements that I consider false. First, Mr.
Clare declared to me that “any suggestion that Ridgeback has
threatened to sue Mr. Love is completely false”; to Love, he wrote
that I “seem[] to be under the misapprehension that Ridgeback has
threatened to sue you for libel . . ..For the avoidance of all doubt,
Ridgeback has never made such a threat, and we sent our previous
letter to (1) identify the false, misleading, and damaging statements
that you made and (2) determine whether you were quoted accurately.”
He went on to say that, given that the Washington Post “has made
retractions,” after what Mr. Clare told me was his “confronting” the
Post and engaging with its libel counsel (does he admit to threatening
to sue the Post>), he was not going to bother engaging any back
-and-forth with Love about the conclusory facts that he was asserting
in his letters.

Well, no. Mr. Clare’s letter to Love did not simply “request” that
Love clarify his remarks (although his second letter to Love phrases
this as a request). He told Love that his quoted assertion about
Ridgeback was “demonstrably false,” and the letter was a demand, not a
request “I demand that you set the record straight by immediately
retracting your defamatory remarks.” Lest Love be in any doubt that he
was facing the prospect of being sued, Mr. Clare dropped a footnote to
the Florida retraction statute, which limits the damages that can be
awarded in a libel suit if the alleged defamer responds appropriately
to a demand for retraction. The letter closed with a warning that Love
should “treat this with the seriousness that Ridgeback deserves.”

Now, Tom Clare is too sophisticated a lawyer to think that a letter
like this would not be treated as a threat of litigation, and, indeed,
I have chatted with a number of friends in DC who represent media
companies in libel litigation, including against Mr. Clare. Every one
of them indicated either (or both) that the letter should fairly be
read as at least implicit threatening to sue, or that, if one of their
clients received a letter like this, indeed from a libel specialist
lawyer, their client would be prudent to assume that they faced suit
if they failed to retract.

It is a mild threat, to be sure – it did not explicitly say “we will
sue you,” and it did not include litigation hold language. But it
seems to me that Mr. Clare imperils his own credibility by denying
that Ridgeback ever threatened to sue.

Conclusions – IS Ridgeback a Molecule Flipper?

I generally recommend that when people received demand letters, the
best response is to describe, in level-headed manner, why they are
right and why they were entitled to say what they said; it is best to
write such letters in consultation with potential litigation counsel
(even if the lawyer does not sign the letter). Love’s letter – which
so far as I can tell was written before obtaining potential libel
counsel— was very well done. He did a very good job of keeping the
temperature down, and his side comments on the impact of cancer on a
family represent a nice personal touch. And the upshot was a complete
capitulation on Ridgeback’s part.

And more than that: it seems to me that the upshot of the exchange of
correspondence is to raise one’s level of confidence in the fairness
of Love (and Kesselheim) having characterized Ridgeback as a molecule
flipper.

I come to this question without any predispositions, other than the
fact that I have known Jamie Love for many years and I respect his
judgment; and colleagues at Public Citizen who do specialize in these
issues share Love’s concerns, especially in light of the questions
Love posed and Ridgeback’s having blown them off. Love and Kesselheim
gave their reasons, and although Mr. Clare disputes them, his demand
letter to Love said that it is “demonstrably false.” In libel law
terms, to say something that is “demonstrably false” could be only an
assertion that it is capable of being proved false – that is, to say,
the phrase can be only an assertion the statement is one of fact,
which could be true or false, and not of opinion, which is not
actionable.

And most important, when given the opportunity to document falsity,
Mr. Clare punted, saying that it is not worth presenting evidence on
the question because the Washington Post has already “made
retractions.” But of course the Post has not retracted the part of its
article that said that characterized Ridgeback’s actions as a “flip.”
At most, it appears to me that the Post made some small clarifications
on issues that are tangential to the gist of the concerns that Mr.
Clare expressed to Love. Moreover, Mr. Clare has undercut the
credibility of the assertions made in his own letters by directly
denying having threatened to sue Love, and by asserting in his letters
that Love referred to Africa as backwater. Neither of these statements
is remotely true. So, if the statement that Ridgeback is a molecule
flipper is just as false (or just as true) as the statements that
Ridgeback never threatened to sue Love and that Love called Africa a
backwater, then it would appear that there is good reason to believe
that Ridgeback is a molecule flipper.

I do give Mr. Clare credit, however, for telling Love explicitly that
Love need no longer be concerned that he is facing suit for his
statements. Unlike Mathew Higbee, who commonly leaves the targets of
his threatening letters to worry about whether a lawsuit is coming
even after he and his client decide not to pursue litigation, Mr.
Clare showed his class by retracting his threat of litigation – if
only after claiming that he had never made a threat in the first
place.



https://www.citizen.org/news/how-to-protect-the-results-if-there-is-a-disputed-election/

October 30, 2020
How To Protect the Results if There Is a Disputed Election

By Bret Thompson

Millions of Americans who weren’t alive for Bush v. Gore, the Supreme
Court case that settled the 2000 election, will be casting their first
presidential ballots this year. While those who remember Florida’s
hanging chad debacle have particular reason to be wary for how the
mechanics of this year’s election will unfold, there are good reasons
for all of us to be concerned.

The biggest reason, of course, is President Donald Trump and his
repeated refusals to affirm that he’ll accept the results of an
election that doesn’t turn out in his favor. This is particularly
worrisome given:

    his endless campaign to sow distrust in the media and experts;
    his propensity for lying;
    and his ability to directly communicate with his most ardent
supporters via text, email, social media, and alt-right media, thus
bypassing traditional gatekeepers.

Even if Trump doesn’t actively stoke discord on or after Election Day,
there are still additional reasons to think this year’s election may
play out unusually. A record number of people have already voted, many
in ways they haven’t before, whether by mail or early in-person.
Additionally, the effects of the pandemic and social distancing
measures will cast a long shadow over precincts and counting rooms
across the country.

While it’s understandable to be worried, don’t be afraid! Public
Citizen is collaborating with over 150 different organizations to form
the Protect the Results coalition. Listening to the will of the people
by following a peaceful transition of power is a hallmark of American
democracy. Protect the Results is organizing Americans, regardless of
party affiliation, to mobilize to defend the valid results of the
election, whether their preferred candidate wins or loses. So far over
375 events in every state have been scheduled should we need to take
to the streets. The New Yorker recently profiled the coalition
discussing how we’re working to ensure that every vote is counted, and
how important it is that the losing candidate put their ego aside and
concede for the good of our country.

So make sure to cast your ballot and then pledge to take action, if
necessary, with Public Citizen and Protect the Results.

https://www.citizen.org/news/its-time-to-re-enter-reality-and-formally-begin-bidens-transition-process/

It’s Time To Re-Enter Reality And Formally Begin Biden’s Transition Process

WASHINGTON, D.C – Trump-appointed General Services Administration
administrator, Emily W. Murphy is refusing to sign off on a key
document needed to formally begin the transition process and to
recognize Joe Biden as the winner of the election and president-elect.
Murphy is the person tasked with officially affirming Biden has won
the election on behalf of the Trump administration – something Trump
has refused to do. She needs to sign a letter to release funds to the
Biden transition team through a process called ascertainment. This
would mark the first formal acknowledgment from the Trump
administration that Biden has won the election, and would unlock
access to national security tools to streamline background checks and
additional funds to pay for training and incoming staff. The following
statement was released by Public Citizen president, Robert Weissman:

“Under the terms of the Presidential Transition Act, the GSA
administrator is charged with making an “ascertainment” that the
election has been resolved. That determination starts the formal
transition process, enabling the incoming administration transition
team to gain access to funds and equipment, to start
conflict-of-interest vetting for potential nominees, and, most
importantly, to begin liaising with top officials of the outgoing
administration.

“This is a simple and straightforward process designed to make
government work, to facilitate an effective start to the new
administration. It has no partisan slant.

“Unfortunately, Murphy is infusing partisanship – at the expense of
the American people – into the process. Murphy is outrageously
refusing to acknowledge what all independent observers know to be
true: Joe Biden won the election. In refusing to make an ascertainment
of Biden’s victory, she is foiling the transition process, leaving the
incoming Biden administration less well equipped to address the
coronavirus pandemic, the economic crisis, and national security,
among other crucial matters.

“That Donald Trump can’t come to terms with his defeat is no excuse
for Murphy not doing her job. Nor are the Trump administration’s
lawsuits; Murphy’s ascertainment does not influence court cases or the
Electoral College. If for some reason the results of the election were
reversed, no damage would be done for having started and then stopped
the transition process. On the other hand, every moment of Murphy’s
delay is another setback for democracy and government preparation to
address the nation’s urgent needs.”



From: Paul Levy
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 12:28 PM
To: 'Daniel Watkins'
Cc: 'Tom Clare'
Subject: RE: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics

I have two more questions: Given that you disclaim having threatened
James Love with being sued if he did not comply with your “demand for
retraction under Florida Statute § 770.02,” are you planning to tell
Love that the prospect of litigation should not be a reason for him to
honor your “demand that [he] set the record straight by immediately
retracting [his allegedly] defamatory remarks,” and that he should
only take action assuming that he is persuaded by your arguments and
evidence? (And might you acknowledge, in all candor, that despite the
absence of a sentence explicitly threatening to sue, a reasonable
reader of the letter might take it that way?)

Second, I am curious about your use of the word “agreed” in describing
the Post’s clarifications and editor’s note: do you have an
“agreement” with the Washington Post concerning the clarification and
note, with a commitment not to sue them for what remains? Or would it
be more fair to characterize the Post’s actions as unilateral in
response to your “confronting” it, but without any “agreement” between
the two sides?


From: Paul Levy
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 5:19 PM
To: 'Daniel Watkins'<daniel@clarelocke.com>
Cc: Tom Clare <tom@clarelocke.com>
Subject: RE: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics

Thanks. I will look forward to seeing your letter to James Love along
with the documents that he requested. When you say “later this week,”
I assume you mean by tomorrow? Certainly I can hold off publishing
until then. Will you be bcc’ing me on the letter?

Given that you go to some length to describe “confronting” the
Washington Post -- I take it that this means you acknowledge
threatening to sue the Post even though you say that you did not
threaten to sue Love – I would like to take a look at the letter you
sent to the Post, in addition to the documents I requested in my
previous email..


From: Daniel Watkins <daniel@clarelocke.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 9:32 AM
To: Paul Levy <plevy@citizen.org>
Cc: Tom Clare <tom@clarelocke.com>
Subject: Re: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics

Dear Paul:
Please see the attached, sent on behalf of Ridgeback Biotherapeutics.

Regards,
Daniel

Daniel P. Watkins | Associate
CLARE LOCKE LLP
10 Prince Street | Alexandria, Virginia 22314
(202) 628-7407 - direct | (804) 426-9454 - cell
daniel@clarelocke.com | www.clarelocke.com


From: Paul Levy <plevy@citizen.org>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 6:35 PM
To: Tom Clare
Subject: Ridgeback Biotherapeutics

I am working on an article about Ridgeback Biotherapeutics, and about
the ways in which some companies use tendentious threats of libel
litigation to try to clean up their reputations by suppressing adverse
opinions.

In that regard, I have read the July 14, 2020 demand letter that you
sent to James
Love, as well as his August 17, 2020 response to you.

Has any response been sent to the questions and document requests posed in
James Love’s email? If not, would you or your client care to respond now?

I am also wondering why your client would have standing to complain
about statements that you say are unfair to Africa and “China / Hong
Kong”; why your client took the statement to BE about Africa and/or
China and Hong Kong; and, indeed why the word “backwater,” as applied
to a continent, a country or a city – or, indeed, to a disease – would
not merely be an opinion. I would also appreciate your comment on how
your client could bring a proper libel claim against someone who has
been quoted in a newspaper article based on the fact that, apparently,
your client does not like the context in which the reporter placed the
quotation. Given the phrasing of the prefatory note in the Post, I
take it that your demand letter to the Post resulted in changes that
satisfied your client, even though the headline still contains the
word “flip.” Or, are you still threatening litigation against the
Post?

I am also wondering about the facts (1) that your demand letter took
particular umbrage at the analogy between Ridgeback’s activities and
the flipping of real estate, but (2) that, so far as I can understand,
no demand letter was sent to Aaron Kesselheim, who was quoted in the
very same Post article as making an express comparison between
Ridgeback and flipping houses. So I am wondering why just to James
Love, and not to the Harvard professor? Might it have had anything to
do with the assumption that a Harvard professor would be better able
to defend himself against a libel suit than the head of a small
nonprofit?

Although I am a lawyer, I do not represent anybody in this matter.
However, I am being cautious by writing to your client’s counsel. If I
should be directing my questions to your client instead, please let me
know.

And please note that I do intend to publish, and attribute, some or
all of the language your letter. Please let me know if the “Not for
Publication or Attribution” legend is a common feature of your demand
letters..

Paul Alan Levy
Public Citizen Litigation Group
1600 20th Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20009
(202) 588-7725
@paulalanlevy
https://www.citizen.org/article/internet-free-speech/ [citizen.org]

DISCLAIMER: This e-mail message and any attachments are intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain information that is confidential or legally
privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of
this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
and permanently delete this message and any attachments.



https://www.citizen.org/article/internet-free-speech/

Internet Free Speech

The rapid growth of the internet and internet technologies created a
powerful opportunity for individuals to be heard on a wide variety of
issues, including  government, the corporations that have an
increasing role in economic security, and unions that represent their
labor interests.

Public Citizen has developed a program of litigation and other forms
of advocacy to protect the rights of these individuals against
entities that seek to curtail or suppress the exchange of ideas and
criticism that is enabled by this online platforms.

View Public Citizen’s Internet Free Speech Cases
Guide for Bloggers and Non-Profit Organizations About Writing with Libel in Mind

This guide discusses the elementary principles of libel law and
explains how to prepare for and conduct a pre-publication libel
review.

View the Guide
Statement of Public Citizen’s Paul Levy on Maryland House Bill 263

In testimony to the Maryland legislature on February 10, 2016, Paul
Levy discussed a pending anti-SLAPP bill and suggested changes to
protect consumers’ speech on matters of public interest.

View the Statement
Legal Perils and Legal Rights of Internet Speakers

This outline contains legal citations, links to relevant web sites,
and other resources.

View the Outline
Litigating Civil Subpoenas to Identify Anonymous Internet Speakers

This 2011 article by Paul Alan Levy explains how to defend against
subpoenas, with citations to relevant cases (published in Litigation,
the journal of the Litigation Section of the American Bar
Association.)

View the Article
A Guide to Fair Use in Posting Soccer Video Clips

View the Guide
Developments in Dendrite

This 2012 article, published in Florida Coastal Law Review, examines
developments in the caselaw governing subpoenas to identify anonymous
internet speakers.

View the Article
Introduction to Section 230

Internet Users Are Liable Only for Their Own Content – An Introduction
to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

View the Article


https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/money-and-power/news/a8479/robert-trump/

Who Was Donald Trump's Brother, Robert Trump?

“He was not just my brother, he was my best friend,” said the
President of his younger brother, who died August 15 age 71.
By Matthew Kassel       

Aug 16, 2020
republican presidential nominee donald trump holds election night
event in new york city
Chip SomodevillaGetty Images

    Robert Trump, Donald Trump's youngest brother, died on Saturday
August 15 in New York City. The White House had recently confirmed
that Robert has been hospitalized in Manhattan, and the President
visited his brother the day before he died. “He was not just my
brother, he was my best friend,” the president said in a statement.

    While he had not been in the media spotlight as much as his older
sibling, Robert was back in the news this summer, as his niece Mary
Trump published a tell-all about her family called Too Much and Never
Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man. Her
publisher, Simon & Schuster, describes the text as a “revelatory,
authoritative portrait of Donald J. Trump and the toxic family that
made him.”

    Robert requested a temporary restraining order in an attempt to
stop the book from being published. In a statement to the New York
Times, he said he was "deeply disappointed" in his niece's decision to
publish the book. “Her attempt to sensationalize and mischaracterize
our family relationship after all of these years for her own financial
gain is both a travesty and injustice to the memory of my late
brother, Fred, and our beloved parents,” he said. “I and the rest of
my entire family are so proud of my wonderful brother, the president,
and feel that Mary’s actions are truly a disgrace.”


SUPREME COURT- STATE OF NEW YORK
DUTCHESS COUNTY
Present:
Hon. HAL B. GREENWALD
Justice.
SUPREME COURT: DUTCHESS COUNTY


ROBERT S. TRUMP,
Plaintiff, DECISION AND ORDER
Index No. 22020-51585
-against- Motion Seq. No. 1
MARY L. TRUMP and SIMON & SCHUSTER,
INC.,
Defendants.


"The following NYSCEF documents were reviewed and considered by the
Court in rendering the within Decision and Order.

NYSCEF Doc. Nos. 1-9, 11-22, 24-45, 46-48, 49, 50-54, 55, 56-78, 79,
80, 81-103, 104, 105-109, 110-115, 116-118, 119, 122-124, 125-126,
128, 129-130, 132-134

RELEVANT FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Frederick Christ Trump, (Fred Trump) a prominent New York City real
estate developer, was born October 11, 1905 and died June 25, 1999. He
married Mary Anne Macleod on January 11, 1936 and they had five (5)
children, Maryanne Trump Barry (born 1937), Fred Trump, Jr.
(1938-1981), Elizabeth Trump Grau (born 1942), Donald Trump (born
1946) and Robert Trump (born 1948). Mary Anne Trump died on August 7,
2000. Litigation concerning the Estates of Fred Trump and of Mary Anne
Trump, as well as multiple intra-family disputes were conducted in
Queens County Surrogate’s Court, (Will of Fred C. Trump, File No
3949-1999) and Nassau County Supreme Court, Trump v. Trump, Index No.
6795-2000). Both matters were settled by an “Agreement and
Stipulation” (the Agreement) dated April 10, 2001. As it pertains to
the instant matter, the Agreement was signed by Donald J. Trump,
Maryanne Trump Barry and Plaintiff, ROBERT S. TRUMP, as “Proponents”
and Fred C. Trump, III and Defendant MARY L. TRUMP, as
“Respondents/Objectants”. Plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP seeks a
preliminary injunction against defendants MARY L. TRUMP and SIMON &
SCHUSTER, INC. (S&S) premised upon the terms set forth in the
aforesaid Agreement."





"The United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit in Democratic
National Committee v. Republican National Committee, 673 F.3d 192
(2012) enforced a Consent Decree entered by the DNC and RNC. The terms
in the Decree to restrict disclosure of specific information were
found to be nonviolative of the restricted party’s First Amendment
rights since consideration had been exchanged.

Another factor to be considered by this Court is what is the status of
publication? According to Jonathan Karp, CEO of S&S (in his initial
Affidavit in Opposition to the Order to Show Cause (NYSCEF Doc.
No.25), paragraph 10: “As of today, [June 30, 2020] approximately
75,000 copies have been printed and bound and are ready for
publication, thousands of which have already been shipped…In addition,
Simon & Schuster has provided, and multiple booksellers have
published, key information concerning the contents of the Book.” Karp
submitted an Amended Affidavit sworn to July 2, 2020 (NYSCEF Doc. No.
81) wherein he specifically states that, “…over 35,000 of which have
already been shipped.”, referring to copies of the Book.

Currently, there is pending an Order to Show Cause by which S&S seeks
to file Karp’s Second Amended Affidavit (NYSCEF Doc. No. 132) sworn to
July 8, 2020which states at paragraph 14 that after the Appellate
Division vacated this Court’s TRO against S&S, “…over 600,000 copies
of the Book had been printed and shipped to retail booksellers large
and small from national chains and online entities to a host of small,
independent booksellers all over the country. In the intervening days,
the Book has been extensively reviewed and commented on in the press,
and excerpts of the book are widely available.”.

There is no doubt that the Book is out in the public eye in
significant quantities and has reached millions of people by the
tremendous attention it has gained by the media. Another “balancing”
test for the Court is between plaintiff and S&S. Comparing the
potential enormous cost and logistical nightmare of stopping the
publication, recalling and removing hundreds of thousands of books
from all types of booksellers, brick and mortar and virtual, libraries
and private citizens, is an insurmountable task at this time. To quote
United States v. Bolton, 2020 WL 3401940 (United States District
Court, District of Columbia) ( Lambeth, J.) “By the looks of it the
horse is not just out of the barn, it is out of the country.”.

Lastly, in the vernacular of First year law students, “Con. Law trumps
Contracts”.

By reason of all the foregoing it is

ORDERED that the Temporary Restraining Order entered against MARY L.
TRUMP as modified by the Appellate Division Decision & Order on
Application (Scheinkman, J.) dated July 1, 2020 is VACATED; and it is
further

ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause of plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP,
made pursuant to CPLR 6301 seeking a preliminary injunction enjoining
and restraining MARY L. TRUMP together with her respective members,
officers, employees, servants, agents, representatives and all others
acting on behalf of or in concert with her, from publishing, printing
or distributing, directly or indirectly, any book or any portions
thereof, including but not limited to the book entitled: “Too Much and
Never Enough, How My Family Created the World’s Most DangerousMan”, in
any medium containing any descriptions or accounts of MARY L. TRUMP’s
relationship with ROBERT S. TRUMP, Donald Trump, or Maryanne Trump
Barry, or assisting any other person or entity in such publication,
printing or distribution, or providing such descriptions or accounts
to any other person (other than counsel of record in this case is
DENIED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Order to Show Cause of plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP,
made pursuant to CPLR 6301 seeking a preliminary injunction enjoining
and restraining SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC. together with its respective
members, officers, employees, servants, agents, representatives and
all others acting on behalf of or in concert with it, from publishing,
printing or distributing, directly or indirectly, any book or any
portions thereof, including but not limited to the book entitled: “Too
Much and Never Enough, How My Family Created the World’s Most
Dangerous Man”, in any medium containing any descriptions or accounts
of MARY L. TRUMP’s relationship with ROBERT S. TRUMP, Donald Trump, or
Maryanne Trump Barry, or assisting any other person or entity in such
publication, printing or distribution, or providing such descriptions
or accounts to any other person (other than counsel of record in this
case is DENIED.

Any relief not specifically granted herein is denied.

The foregoing constitutes the decision and order of this court.

Dated: July 13, 2020
Poughkeepsie, New York


__________________________________
HON HAL B. GREENWALD, J.S.C

Pursuant to CPLR Section 5513, an appeal as of right must be taken
within thirty days after service by a party upon the appellant of a
copy of the judgment or order appealed from and written notice of its
entry, except that when the appellant has served a copy of the
judgment"




Charles J. Harder, Esq.
HARDER, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP
100 Park Avenue, 16th Floor
New York, New York 10017
(212) 799-1400
CHarder@harderLLP.com

William G. Sayegh, Esq.
THE LAW FIRM OF WILLIAM G. SAYEGH, P.C.
Attorneys for Plaintiff ROBERT S. TRUMP
65 Gleneida Avenue
Carmel, New York 10512
(845) 228-4200
wgs@sayeghlaw.com

Theofore J. Boutrous, Jr., Esq.
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant MARY L. TRUMP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 229-7000
tboutrous@gibsondunn.com

Anne Champion, Esq.
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant MARY L. TRUMP
200 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10166
(212) 351-4000
achampion@gibsondunn.com

Elizabeth A. McNamara, Esq.
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE, LLP
Attorneys for Defendant SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC.
1251 Avenue of the Americas, 21st Floor
New York, New York 10020-1104
(212) 603-6437
lizmcnamara@dwt.com

 

 

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/05/12-years-of-deepening-debt-limit-nbs.html

 

DANNY BOY THIS IS IMPORTANT HERE IS THE DIGITAL PROOF THAT THE EMAIL I JUST SENT WAS RECEIVED.

IF THE CONSERVATIVES IN "THE PLACE TO BE " WERE WISE THEY WOULD SAY MY NAME ON THE RECORD INSIDE THE OLD MAISON TODAY TO PROTECT THEIR OWN DUMB ARSES FROM LAWSUITS BUT WE ALL KNOW THAT WON'T HAPPEN. THEY ARE ALL AS DUMB AS POSTS AND BETTING THAT THAT PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND APATHY WILL ALWAYS PREVAIL. HOWEVER METHINKS THEY UNDERESTIMATE PISSED OFF MARITIMERS WHO UNDERSTAND WHAT A TOOL FOR GOD AND EVIL THAT THE INTERNET HAS BECOME.

MAYBE JUST MAYBE OUR BLOGS WILL HAVE SOEM EFFECT SOONER OR LATER EH? AT LEAST FOR NOW NOBODY CAN STOP US FROM TRYING LIKE HELL TO EXPOSE THE AWFUL TRUTH OF IT ALL.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: leg-consultations@gnb.ca
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:56:39 -0300
Subject: Select Committee - Tax Review - Comité special - Examen de la fiscalité
To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Thank you for your interest in the Discussion Paper on New Brunswick's Tax System. The Select Committee on Tax Review will review your comments as part of the mandate to conduct public consultation and report to the House with recommendations on the options contained in the discussion paper.

Public Hearings: Individuals or organizations wishing to make a presentation to the Committee should advise the Office of the Clerk of the Legislative Assembly Shayne.Davies@gnb.ca by June 20th, 2008. Presentations should be no longer than 20 minutes. (See Schedule)

Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:56:22 -0300
From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
To: danf@danf.net, injusticecoalition@hotmail.com, coi@gnb.ca, mike.ferguson@gnb.ca, Heather.Campbell@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, Chrystiane.Mallaley@gnb.ca, leg-consultations@gnb.ca, wwwleg@gnb.ca, nbpc@gnb.ca, arnold.hadley@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, frederic.loiseau@fredericton.ca, tony.whalen@gnb.ca
Subject: Document that Conservatives should study on the last days of summer in the Old Maison
CC: madeleine.dube@gnb.ca, David.ALWARD@gnb.ca, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, claude.landry@gnb.ca, percy.mockler@gnb.ca, trevor.holder@gnb.ca, margaret-ann.blaney@gnb.ca, rose-may.poirier@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, dale.graham@gnb.ca, jody.carr@gnb.ca, mlanewmaryland@nb.aibn.com, johnw.betts@gnb.ca, paul.robichaud@gnb.ca, tony.huntjens@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, claude.williams@gnb.ca, cy.leblanc@gnb.ca
 
Danny Boy

Please post these documents in you Blog ASAP to aid in defence of our fleeting democracy in "The Place to BE". I am knida wondering why you haven't posted the one from Elections Canada yet. Trust that it is wicked poison for Stevey Boy Harper for swallow.

These are two of the smiling bastards documents and one of mine. All are irrefuttable. Signed sealed delivered and witnessed. I got some rather interesting challenges in Youtube ( I inserted them and my response within this email because the cop claim they don't look at YouTube even though they have created their own.

For the record after I called and talked to some liberals lately they made more false allegations against me to the Fat Fred City Finest and the RCMP as well. When the cops refused to answer me in writing in order to resolve the obvious malice I called and emailed the Police Commission of New Brunswick in order to make a complaint yesterday. It seems that someone wanted me to come to the see the tough talking cops of Fat Fred City Finest in the lobby of their HQ. I answered the dummy's challenge and he quickly bailed out of YouTube I may take the cops up on it soon. But I will pick the date and time and who my witnesses are not them. I ain't that dumb yet..

The first document is what I served the Jan 20th, 2006 to the liberals seated in opposition in the Leg while I was running against Andy Baby Scott in Fat Fred City. aI had a friend take pictures to
prove it was done. The guy who was protesting in a military uniform about the plight of his kids while they lived on the base in Gagetown witnessed it all on the very day Paul Martin (Humpty Dumpty) came to Fat Fred City and had fancy pow wow up on the Hanwell in his last days as Prime Minister. I told the ex soldier about the meeting and he went up there and protested with the same documents and that Chucky Leblanc has had for four years in his hand with a perosnal note to from me to the Chief of Police Barry Mcknight on the outside of the envelope so the cops would not harass him. This is a fact.

Months later I brought my friend the farmer Werner Bock to Fat Fred City and Shawny Baby sent him his letter later but Werner witnessed the Sgt at Arms and the Fat Fred City Finest illegally deny me my Charter Section 2 rights with a signed document that nobody wants to talk about to this very day. Although it was Bernie Lord's mandate that did it. Shawny Baby Graham and some of his liberal cohorts such as Kelly Lamrock sat on the panel that voted to attack my legal and civil rights and Freedoms under the Charter.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

First off the cops definitely know what YouTube is. Hell they use it.

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=Zo299kHPuYM&fromurl=/watch%3Fv%3DZo299kHPuYM

Here is what was said to me yesterday in YouTube and my responses.

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=oDc_3qiERJg

bigolcanoworms (14 hours ago)

Here is an open invitation to you David Appear at the Fredericton City Police station at high noon June 18th .

All that can should attend to see if David Raymond Amos is the man he claims , if he will honor his clan and back up his statements . Or will he dishonor his father and brothers memory and that of his clans by showing himself to be the spineless fake coward he is . I paid to see a high divin act , and Im a gonna see a high diving act.....David

DavidRaymondAmos (14 hours ago)

Now you have truly proven yourself to be a Yankee or a lover of them at least. The Fat Fred City Finest are arseholes of that I have no doubt. Methinks they at least know how to spell honour correctly. For the record the Dead men I do honour are whispering to me that you maybe none other than Norfolk County Depupt Dog Robert F. O'Meara best butt buddy of Dirty Dicky Dean and the Fat Fred City Finest N'est Pas?
 
What are the odds do ya think the smiling bastards will return my Harley? Slim to none?

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=8aMkVccrOwo

bigolcanoworms (15 hours ago)

I open an invitation to you Davis Raymond Amos . Show yourself June 18th at high noon , at the Fredericton City Police station lobby .
If you are what you say you are you will be present , if you are but a bullshitter and a fake you will not have the balls to show .

DavidRaymondAmos (14 hours ago)

As I said I called PAULINE PHILIBERT and ARNOLD HADLEY of the Police Commission today and complained about you. After reading your latest bullshit I just called Fat Fred City's Finest (506 460-2300) I was not shy and asked for the arsehole commenting in here. The woman pretended not to know what I was talking about and falsely claimed that you
arseholes don't have internet access. Everybody knows its free in Fat Fred City the far from wisest town in Canada. So what is your name chickenshit?

http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=p0NdNtvC-YI

bigolcanoworms (23 hours ago)

Almost time to have you arrested , yes I think so

DavidRaymondAmos (18 hours ago)

Time to take your meds Fed. As Kevin Baby Jackson of National Security quite likely already knows I dealt with the malicious bullshit of T.J. Burke and his liberal cohorts in a heartbeat with the Quebecer Frederic Loiseau of Fat Fred City's Finest and Cst David Kenny of the GRCs in Moncton. My next call is of course to the malicious Police Commission of New Brunswick once again. We all know what'll happen next EH donut muncher?

At least I have no false illusions grandeur like you do N'est PAS?


http://www.youtube.com/comment_servlet?all_comments&v=s81-Ln56MQc

bigolcanoworms (22 hours ago)

Must be June , a perfect time to arrest a lone

DavidRaymondAmos (18 hours ago)

First you must have a legit reason then have the balls to have a name to sign a bullshit complaint. then you must argue me in a court in front of a jury of my peers EH ya not so tough guy with no name?

bigolcanoworms (15 hours ago)

You want tough , come to Fredericton police station tomorrow (june 18th) at 12:00 noon (high noon ) . Lets see if you are man enough to show your face David . Or if you will turn and run , maybe hide at an old saw mill for awhile , or maybe you can hide behind your mamas skirt .

DavidRaymondAmos (14 hours ago)

Perhaps I may accommodate you sooner than you wish. When I do have your laywr buddy Brucy Baby Noble on hand and I will give him some Yankee Police wiretap tapes in front of some witnesses of my mine. Perhaps you should talk to the Police Commission first and tell everybody your name arsehole first to keep everything on the up and up EH?

If you doubt I contacted the Police Commission about your malice Google the latest QSLS Dummy and say Hoka Hey to Johnny "Never Been Good" Foran for me too.

DavidRaymondAmos (13 hours ago)

"This account is closed."

http://www.youtube.com/index?&session=e9TfE-OvXLexNIBYDee_QASkJwHiwbIzdRHHG42IY7nWsGC0Nr8ZS2EiNHsf3iwj3BpWEDdBDzJw27pg2pccO4qCZnXzBBrwGGts-U3K8voTZgt8jmAVhGMyMULTPL0VnxHqUMDWAQmSdCMmW_7XC4AnibfXGR1aR7izqG5LXnsAZt-7KsiYTntOKdmzUMBZfZF5jl_Rx7_4nZfKolsiz-tmECoS1rY0W_depsKM3fy9sGJhe5PP557G1vfs2xQyZXPA_ws9JNsBwErhJjGREg==

So much for tough talking hit and run chickenshit cops EH? One call the the Fat Fred City Finest 506 460 2300 and ask for the nasty bastard and poof the arsehole is gone. EH?
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Blogger David Raymond Amos said...
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:06:39 -0300
From: "David Amos" david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
To: abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, info@frederictonsocial.net, dcoon@conservationcouncil.ca, forest@conservationcouncil.ca, chris.collins@gnb.ca, cheryl.lavoie@gnb.ca, Roland.HACHE@gnb.ca, mary.schryer@gnb.ca, victor.boudreau@gnb.ca, rick.brewer@gnb.ca, saintjohnfundy@hotmail.com, rick.miles@gnb.ca, donald.arseneault@gnb.ca, kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, ronald.ouellette@gnb.ca, eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca
Subject: Hey Abe Baby LeBlanc has your arse kissing blogger buddy Chucky Leblanc or his "Blogger General" Jacky Boy Keir told ya the GAME is Still On?
CC: bill.fraser@gnb.ca, roly.macintyre@gnb.ca, brian.kenny@gnb.ca, roy.boudreau@nb.aibn.com, aurena.murray@gnb.ca, carmel.robichaud@gnb.ca, hedard.albert2@gnb.ca, dlandry@nbnet.nb.ca, rick.doucet@gnb.ca

I heard that you brag about enjoying a good scrap Abey Baby. Consider this about round five in a four year battle with you corrupt smiling bastards. I ain't done not by a long shot. We ain't even met in court yet. I am just playing hard ball politics until i judge the time is right. T.J. Burke and his cops can't rush me into doing something I don't wish to do until i want to do it. Even a dumb French man on meds with Scotish roots should understand at least that EH Chucky Leblanc?

Check me work in at least two places on the Internet Abey Baby if Chucky or your idiot pal Ivan Court hasn't told ya all about it by now.

Have a look at these blogs too arsehole. Just inc ase ya don't know the bloggers Danny Boy and Richy Baby Harris and I have made friends of sorts and the Gypsy and the snb Mikey Archibald have remaied silent as the grave but at least ethical and allowed my posts to stand the test of time. Despite our differences I do admire their styles and tenacity and words in their personal pursuits against the wall of public corruption..The well paid corporate controled media and their severe lack of integrity pales in comparison even if do say so myself.

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/06/nb-legislature-meets-again-june-17th.html

http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/04/tjburke-letter-to-me.html

http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.com/2008/03/just-wrong.html

http://blogcastnb.blogspot.com/2007/10/poor-poor-irvings-and-protestors.html

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/04/just-dave.html

Rest assured the Fake Left Whimps in Fat Fred City such as David Coon and his crowd won't say shit to offend the hand that feeds. After I heard Werner trying to Roly Hache and Mikey Murphy's people into acting with the scope of their employment today, I overheard Coon trying to argue a farmer about things they both agree on. I just shook my head at the nonsense of it all and kept on writng my little rants against the malicious sytem you people have created for your benefit not "WE THE PEOPLE" who elected you to protect our best interests and uphold the laws of the land.. The problem is Coon and you people are on the Gravy Train and the Common folk are not. They just pay the taxes to fuel you out of control rigging.

For the record as I said at the Uranium meeting last week in Peticodiac that is why the Fake will NEVER do the right thing Methinks they doth protest too much and yet do nothing all to back up their fancy words EH? Yet they think me rude.to call them Bullshitters? So be it. But at least I am ethical in my words and deeds as Werner is as well. Call us liars and put in writing and sign your name to it. I have Double Dog Dared Anyone To Take me on in Federal Court or elsewhere in a Pro Se fashion many times and not once has any lawyer or cop or politcian or Fake Left whiner accepted an honest challenge but the Irvings are quick to try to covertly deny that I haven't sued many lawyers in my time in this Wonderful Old World.

Well guess who is back in the "Place to BE" for awhile longer at least? Guess who WILL file some lawsuits in Federal Court in Fat Fred City before he leaves for the USA once again? Do ya hear me talking. do I sound shy in Werner's YouTubes Abey Baby? Wanna call me on a phone with a restricted number and call me some more names Abey Baby? 506 756 8687 Rest assured I will relish the call. It will be witnessed just like the last time you called just before Tanker became the Speaker and you had to kiss his nasty arse in order to remain in the Old Maison and on the the Gravy Train. It must rot your socks to see the dummy Wally Stiles cross the floor and become a Cabinet Minister while you still warm the back bench and merely vote in support of
whatever Dougy Tyler and the rest of the boyz tells Shawny Baby and his fellow arseholes what to do. Tell me honestly if ya dare have ever think of sitting as an Independent Abey Baby and speaking from the heart instead of your wallet, Abey Baby?

BTW the honourable immigrant farmer Werner Bock is still waiting for you and the big dummy Leroy Armstrong to show up at the farm like Shawny Baby Graham promised you would do two god damned years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=WernerBock&p=r

Whats the matter Abey Baby are ya too scared of crossing paths with me? Some tough guy you are on the phone EH? Too bad ya didn't have the balls to back up your mouth years ago if only for the memory of all the dead cattle in the killing fields of the "Place TO BE" who died over the past thirty three years trying to stuff your big belly in all the barbecues this summer and in summers long past. You and you arse kissing blogger cousin Chucky Leblanc bullshit your fellow sheople in order to sooth their greedy little souls as they all kow tow to the Irving Empire that you worship night and day EH Frenchy?

If nothing else I have the balls to call a spade a spade N'est Pas Frenchy?

That said I must say I feel better ALREADY. It is good to get the poison out one's system now and then. Tis time for me to finish writing a few lawsuits and enjoy my summer. Say Hoka Hey to the RCMP for me will ya? There is lots of time for me to raise some Hell with the FBI south of the 49th this fall. The bastards have delayed John Graham's trial that was supposed to start yesterday until the fall now.

You smiling bastards do recall that the sneaky Yankee Barry Bachrach was my wife's lawyer too EH? Think about how Graham's trial may turn out if my name breaks the surface of your scum this summer.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2720255/Barry-SC-order

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2897445/Bullshit-Yankee-Summons

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3024834/FBI

http://www.grahamdefense.org/news_bachrach1.htm

http://www.grahamdefense.org/news_straight1.htm

http://ourfreedom.wordpress.com/category/john-graham/

REST ASSURED POLITICKING WITH THE NOMIND BASTARDS WITHIN THE "PLACE TO BE" HAS BEEN CHILD'S PLAY FOR ME. CHECK MY WORK BEFORE I CAME HOME YEARS AGO.

ANYBODY REMEMBER THIS WOMAN? THE BLACK FOLKS AND THE INDIANS IN THE USA HAD LITTLE TROUBLE WITH THE FBI TOO. N'EST PAS?

THE FACT THAT THEY WERE ASKING FOR MY FILES YEARS AGO KINDA PROVES
THAT I AIN'T NO GOD DAMNED FED OR A HELLS ANGEL EH?

PERHAPS I AM JUST AS I SAY EH? JUST A PISSED OFF MARITIMER WHO IS
SERIOUS AS A HEART ATTACK ABOUT EXPOSING RAMPANT PUBLIC CORRUPTION FOR THE BENEFIT OF HIS CLAN.

----- Original Message -----
From: Angela Pepper Davis
To: davidamos@comcast.net
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: Ethical Concerns sent to Terry Begay

David,

My name is Pepper Davis. Since I cannot get into your briefcase
without a password and since you have raised our interest in your
concerns (mine and Terry's), would you be so kind as to explain
further what it is that you sent to Stephanie Herseth, William
Janklow, et al .

Do you have information posted at a website? Is Jeralyn Merritt
assisting you and if so in what way?

Any further information you feel comfortable in sharing would be
appreciated.

Pepper

In the "MEAN" time WHILE THE US PRESIDENTIAL RACE HEATS UP AND THE
DUMMY DENNIS KUCINCICH IS HAVING HIS VERY LATE MOTION TO IMPEACH BUSH ARGUED everybody and his dog such as Lord Conrad Black, folks who support Ron Paul and even the folks suing over Agent Orange should find the text of a letter sent out by certified mail last year along with many documents and a CD a very interesting read on the Intertnet nearly one year later. Now that Black is looked up Ron Paul is aloser and an intersting trial is beginning in Newfoundland EH?

FYI Dizzy Lizzy May of the Green Meanies got exactly the same material signature required. Now does anyone understand why I hate lawyers and Fake Left whining wannabes? Ask me if I care if ya don't.

August 17th, 2007

Andrew Frey
1675 West Broadway
New York, New York
10019-5820
Phone 212 506-2635

Ron Paul
3461 Washington Blvd. Suite 200
Arlington, Virginia 22201
Phone 703 248-9115

Mike Gravel
PO Box 948,
Arlington, Virginia
22216-0948
Phone 703 652-4698

Tony Merchant
83 St. Paul Ouest
Montréal, Québec H2Y 1Z1
Phone 866 982 7777

RE: Public Corruption

Hey Fellas

Remember me? I am the guy with no name worth mentioning or who even does not deserve a call back. EH? That said here is the hard copy of the material you must have forgot that I promised to send your way.

Out of the gate I must ask you dudes the same question I asked Eddy Greenspan, Mr. Frey's pal and many others over the years. After bragging so much about your sense of ethics and deeds in order to catch people's attention in order to solicit their vote or to hire you for your legal prowess, why did you dudes choose to play dumb with me?

If you do not support the public corruption that you have made a fine living within, the common courtesy of calling me back to ask a few legitimate questions about our common concerns and to stress test my integrity would have went a very long way towards convincing me that you were the honest men I have been seeking for years. A little effort on your part to try to understand what I was trying to share with you would have saved me the time and expense of putting you over a barrel and busting ya in front of my peers, the common folk you claim to respect.

The lawyers, Frey and Merchant do not even have to respond. I suspect they know that they should wait to see if summons to court comes from me first before deciding how to appear ethical. N'est Pas?

I already understand their game quite well. If they doubt me they should mention my name to their pals, Patrick Fitzgerald and Eddy Greenspan or any other lawyer named within these documents. In my humble opinion the dumb Maritimer in me played all those very snobby
lawyers like fiddle. I have enough angles on the Lord Conrad Black matter to embarrass everybody involved. Tis time for the political animal in me to pounce and growl a bit to see if haughty Lord Conrad Black is ready and willing to ignore his lawyers and listen to me in order to try to not going to jail like the dumb Martha Stewart and Frank Quattrone did years ago.. If the Hollinger executives were truly wise and acting for the best benefit of their shareholders, they would reconsider everybody's doings in the matter, particularly the lawyers. I received Eddy Greenspan s comical answer yesterday thus Andy Frey his associate in the defence of the Dark Lord of the media, Conrad Black as well as a lawyer suing the nasty old snob gets my stuff just as I promised. Don't say you don't know who I am Andy Baby, I caught you peeking at my blog. Remember?

The same holds true for you Tony Merchant you as a lawyer and your wife as a Canadian Senator. I have made certain that you both have known who I am for over three goddamned years now. If you have any doubts about my tenacity in the pursuit of Justice ask your wife to give the elusive Stevey Boy Harper or the crook Jean T. Fournier a call and tell them I said Hoka Hey and seek their so called Ethical Counsel. Quite Frankly, it is hightime for everybody to shit or get off the pot.

As for the two Yankee politicians I have sent this stuff to, I am still somewhat confused by both of you. You both say largely the right things about the sad state of Yankee affairs of state. However the word of Ron Paul don't ring true because as a seated congressman from Texas of Georgey Boy Bush's ilk he has had lots of opportunity to speak up in Congress just like Jim Traficant had the balls to do not too long ago. You double talk far too much to suit me which is no surprise for a politician to do but your motives truly escape me To put it simply, Ron Paul I have come to understand that you are just another bullshitter. Feel free to prove me wrong. In truth I would welcome it and quickly apologize.

On the other hand Mike Gravel you do seem to be a very straight up dude. The fact that the corporate controlled media is trying hard to ignore you just like they did with me speaks well of the sincerity of your efforts. I love it when you tell the media dudes in no uncertain terms what you think of them. The facts about what you did with the Pentagon Papers many years ago speak volumes about your integrity anyway. You could have easily rested on your laurels as an
honest politician who did the right thing. The fact that you suddenly burst upon the scene and speak plainly about awful truths adds to my respect of you. Your age alone dictates that you do not have much to gain other than securing your proper place in history someday as a very rare ethical politician indeed. My hat is off to you sir. I mean you no disrespect but I have some doubts because the words of your assistants to me on the phone. If you truly mean what you say why don't you call me back personally rather than allow your assistants to continue to piss me off? You may not know a thing about me and I truly hope that is true. However from this point in time forward you can never say that you did not know that I exist and I try hard to impeach Georgey Boy Bush all by myself. If you are the man I certainly hope you are methinks it is high time for you to just mention my name in a pubic forum after you checked hard copy of some of my work. Failing that just crawl back under the rock that you said you hid under for years after you spoken of all the other things you know for a fact to be true for the benefit of the rest of us. You claim that government should be run by the people. Why not let them decide who is a lair and who is not and how the political cards should fall? Please just ask the people who do listen to you to check my work posted on the internet (davidamos.blogspot.com or under the user name
DavidRaymondAmos in YouTube) and let them decide for themselves whether I am crazy or not. After all I did run for public office in the Maritimes four times in the past three years and I have sued more lawyers than anybody else I have ever heard of and yet nobody has ever dared to sue me let alone even say my name. That fact alone makes my name worth repeating. Read on before any of you dare to call me a liar. What I just spoke of is merely the tip of the very malevolent iceberg. As you listen to the CD of a copy of the Yankee police surveillance tape # 139 and read my letters to Georgey Boy Bush lawyers shouldn't somebody ask Alberto Gonzales what he has thought about all the illegal wiretap tapes I have had in my possession for many years?

Pursuant to my phone calls and emails please find enclosed the material that I promised to send to you before we may meet in a court someday. The list of the material and a brief explanation as to why I am providing it to you is listed as follows:

I have attached directly to this letter copies of three letters of mine, two to me one from the US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald and the other from Senator John MaCain. The is the letter from me that I am certain the Barack Obama used to become the keynote Speaker in Beantown in July of 2004. Thus far it has gone unanswered just like the one to Hillary Clinton and several others who wanted to be President in 2003. However as you study my documents you will see that Johnny Boy Edwards and Dumb Dennis Kucinich and many of Mitt Romney's underlings certainly answered me over the years. I am very comfortable that my past works stands on its own without further input from me. Sooner or later some of the truth always leaks out. Ask Dick Cheney and his buddies. EH Mr. Frey?

I have also enclosed exactly the same material that Eddy Greenspan and some prominent Canadian Feds just acknowledged that they received before I start filing my first complaint in Canadian courts. I do not feel the need to say much more other than to say I think that you would be wise to study every word I have sent you. And do with your newfound knowledge in the best interest of the public trust place in your chosen professions.

In closing I make no apologies whatsoever for any mistakes I may have made in the wording or the text of this letter. It was written in a great hurry under circumstance that anyone would find hard to believe. There is no denying that I am very pissed off but I have never lost my temper yet and I am of no threat to anyone at despite what some crooked lawyer or cop may wish to claim in order to cover up their own wrongs. I truly hope that any of you or all of you call me back to make some sort of amends.

Veritas Vincit

David Raymond Amos
121 McLaughlin Rd.
Acworth, NH 03607
Phone 506 434 1379
C/o Werner Bock
3345 Route 890
Hillgrove, NB E4Z 5W3



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Raymond Amos noreply-comment@blogger.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 07:24:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Just Dave] New comment on Just Dave.
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com

David Raymond Amos has left a new comment on the post "Just Dave":

DANNY BOY THIS IS IMPORTANT HERE IS THE DIGITAL PROOF THAT THE EMAIL I JUST SENT WAS RECEIVED.

IF THE CONVERVATIVES IN "THE PLACE TO BE " WERE WISE THEY WOULD SAY MY
NAME ON THE RECORD INSIDE THE OLD MAISON TODAY TO PROTECT THEIR OWN
DUMB ARSES FROM LAWSUITS BUT WE ALL KNOW THAT WON'T HAPPEN. THEY ARE ALL AS DUMB AS POSTS AND BETTING THAT THAT PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND APATHY WILL ALWAY PREVAIL. HOWEVER METHINKS THEY UNDERESTIMATE PISSED OFF MARITIMERS WHO UNDERSTAND WHAT A TOOL FOR GOD AND EVIL THAT THE
INTERNET HAS BECOME.
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Hey Arsehole Amos,,,,,it's your favorite brother-in-law. How come you keep me blocked from your "Youtube' site? Guess you're afraid people will hear the truth from me, EH? Now you have your new best friend, Werner, blocking me. Now we all know who is really running Werner's Youtube site. I'm wondering,,,,,you said I was stalking your kids. Did you even know that one of your kids quit sckool, back in February? All because of you. Another thing you can put on your list of accomplishments. Something a real papa can be proud of doing. What a real piece of shit you are, EH? signed,,,,,,,,your bro-in-law,,,,,,,,,,,,Bob O'Meara.
Tuesday, June 24, 2008
Blogger David Raymond Amos said...
You and your dumb lawyer Angie Baby must be feeling the heat EH Depupty Dog?

I repeat stay awy from my kids Yankee.
Thursday, June 26, 2008
Anonymous Anonymous said...
No heat down here for anyone, except for you. And I'll repeat myself, arsehole,,,,,,,,,,,,,,fuck you, I'll talk to anyone I want to.I guess you have nothing intelligent to say to any of your fans, about destroying your kids lives, EH? I hear Laura is pretty sick of you, too.Has Werner finally figured out that it is you who is killing his cattle. Don't worry,,,,,,,,,,,,I'll be in touch with him. Cya,,,,,,
Friday, June 27, 2008
Blogger David Raymond Amos said...
Hells Angels EH Chucky Leblanc? When was the last time you or the Irvings or the RCMP saw one ride a Panhead alone?
FRom: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
SEnt: Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 4:08 AM
To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, T.J.Burke@gnb.ca, john.foran@gnb.ca, Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca, frederic.loiseau@fredericton.ca, tony.whalen@gnb.ca
Cc: abel.leblanc@gnb.ca, jack.keir@gnb.ca, premier@gnb.ca, Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca

Remeber these old emails of yours Chucky Baby? Post this photo of my nasty arse I Double Dog Dare Ya to Frenchy. At least my baby boy's little arse is far more innocent looking than Shawny Baby Grahams black eye EH Frenchy?

Small wonder that I didn't allow him anywhere near and of Cardinal
Law's nasty Boyz in Beantown EH?

You must I figured out by now that I hate diddlers and especiallly the ones who pretend to be oh so pious and above us all. By now you must at least understand one of the reasons I supported Byron Prior years ago in his quest for justice but I was always more concerned about about what he knows about Johnny Crosbie, the Haliburton dudes and our dead fish. But you don't know the first thing about that do ya. It must be because not one of your five brians knows how to read Nest Pas?

HELL ANGELS FROM MONTREAL LOOKING FOR CHARLES LEBLANC????
by Charles LeBlanc Saturday, Jun. 12, 2004 at 11:26 AM

Thursday morning, I showed up at the Legislature to use the computer
at the Library. I was told by security that two rough looking individuals walked through the doors and asked for a Charles Leblanc? They described the guys as rough looking and one of them had a long gray beard with a leather jacket!
At first, I believe it was the Hell Angels coming down from Montreal for a hit on Charles.

Hours later, I seen my bigot buddy Matthew Glenn and he was in front
of the Legislature with his blowhorn.
For you people who don't know the bigot? He's the one who started the
Anglo Society. I seen him preaching to three young kids and of course
I butt in and said - Hey Bigot??? Why don't you bigot go home?

Minutes later, we were approached by two guys and they asked politely
–Where can we locate a Charles LeBlanc???
In a matter of seconds, the bigot quickly pointed at me. I said to
myself - Ohhh?? Thanks a lot Bigot!!!

At the end? It was a guy named David Amos and I guess that he's running at an independent in the riding of Fundy Royal. The guy have been living in the area of Boston and he's been following my updates on the internet. I'm telling you that the information highway is a great way to spread the message to the rest of the world!

We talked for around 30 minutes and it was nice to see the bigot, me and David Amos together debating our own little concern issue. We all have our own issues and it's too bad that we cannot unite and fight but that's the way Canadians do things. They remind silent until the Government really pissed them all and go out and vote the party in power out of office. (You Stole my words Chucky)

Two weeks later you wrote this Chucky

What did I tell you people in the past? Someone is going to crack up one of these days and I know for a fact the area targeted is going to be the Legislature.

There's always undercovers cops around but only when the House is in session. As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but it's just a matter of time till someone is push over the edge.

I guess a guy name David Amos was shown the door yesterday at the Legislature. This guy is running as an Independent candidate in the riding of Fundy Royal. I met the guy over the net and he has a beef with our political bureaucrats. I admire people fighting for what they believe in but you can't get carried away.

I guess in this case? He wanted to speak from the Gallery and that's a big faux pas!

After you continued to make fun of me throughout the summer of 2004 amongst the other things I forwarded to you was an old joke about my drunken Irish Catholic in laws in Beantown. N'est Pas? It must have pissed you off as I tortured the Hell out of your buddy Bernie Richard the nasty Ombudsman too before my wife and I and a lawyer visited the Police Commission. In response you sent photos of your old soon to be dead dog comparing it to me. I laughed the photos were taken by your Fake Left friends and emailed to you. Your big Faux Pas was that you were so dumb you sent me their email address too. Thus in a wink of an eye I knew and had the proof of who was behind you and pulling your strings. Do they remember my conversations with them last year? I do. The question is did I record them as they made liars out of themselves. LOL EH? Stay tuned Frenchy. When you saw that I was falsely imprisoned in Boston on October 1st, 2004 you largely shut up and never responded to my emails over the course of the past four years because you knew what I did with them after that. As the old Joke goes many a true word is said in jest and you did not like other people reading your nonsense to me. Correct?

Years after that old joke I sent you went around. The Yankees made a movie starring Jack Nicholson based on Whitey's life and times. It is entitled "The Departed". Perhaps the drunken Catholic in you should rent it sometime with your welfare dimes. Listen closely to what ol Jacky Boy says about your Church and their very corrupt doings. My Keith ancestors and I were not alone in our contempt towards your church EH? Did your Mama tell you that the Keiths came out of northern Germany to settle in Scotland in order to escape your nasty Popes and their cohorts? Do you understand that after the shit was settled in 1755 the Frenchmen in Canada who did not wish to be shipped out to other French holdings swore allegiance to the British Crown? What makes you dudes think that you can change the deal now especially in light of the fact every Indian demands that we hold up to all the other deals our ancestors made long before any of us were born? The Scottish part of you should shove that Acadian flag along with its flagpole up your French arse Chucky Baby. Is that clear or COR enough for you?

To rub it in I will tell you that after my father died my Mama married Loyd Nickerson a member of the COR Party who was also the Chief Electoral Officer of New Brunswick. One big reason I ran in Fundy is that there are damn few French men registered to vote and not many Catholic churches in Kings County. I ain't a bigot. I love French Catholic women. Hell I was the first of my family that I know of who married a Catholic woman. It is their greedy Catholic brothers that I hate be they either French or Irish or whatever. I believe they call this shit conflict of colours Orange versus Green not biker bullshit as you claimed about me. I don't wear Biker colours I where the colours of My Clan and I have many friends. Quite possibly many more true French ones than you do. How can you have true friends at all if they can't trust you. Do your even believe yourself and your obvious Bullshit? How do you sleep at night knowing yourself as you do? Why to do make fun of a fellow Maritimer whose family was destroyed by the very people you pretend to complain about? Never forget I am from Dorchester Frenchy and Ivan Cormier (AKA the Beast) was on my paper route and I liked and admired him and his friends and their art particularly Killer Karl Krupp and the Cuban. Their Bullshit was flat out entertaining and not malicious at all. Yours definitely is malicious and not funny at all. No Class Bobby Bass had way more class in his worst fart than you do in your whole soul. I must say venting some of my venom towards you is definitely good for my savage soul. As a southern friend of mine would say when I was feeling mean years ago "Ya gots to get the poison out or ya die just don't spit out in my direction. Save it for somebody who deserves it."

BTW, the man who sold me that old Panhead that your cop buddies in Fat Fred City stole from me last summer was a of French Cathlolic heritage out of Quebec. He was a really good friend of mine and I named my bike after him and his wife. His family moved from Quebec to Vermont about a hundred years ago when your greedy priests demanded that the poor folks build another big fancy church across the road from the one they just built. So they crossed the border, built a simple church and went about the pursuit of happiness in a country that is supposed to keep
church and state separate and have only one official language. Go try your crybaby French welfare nonsense in New Hampshire or Vermont sometime Chucky and see if you come back in one piece. I would pay money I don't have to watch that circus tent unfold. The Pope's mission is to keep you dudes poor and dumb. Get it Frenchy? If not ask your hero Spinksy Baby to argue me as if I care what any of you think. I would argue him right after that chickenshit IDs himself and proves to me and everyone else that he is not Brent Taylor.

I Double Dog Dare Ya to post this email in his blog. I am posting it deep in your buddy the Gypsy's blog before I post it in mine. That is if he has still maintained his integrity after all my stress tests last week. You dudes kissing the "The General Blogger" nasty arse was too much for me to stand. It was too funny that T. J Burke blocked my defence of your blatant stupidity N'est Pas?

BTW one of my wife's cousins Robert T. Kickham you remember the evil ex banker who turned into the evil priest is still Cardinal O'Malley's secretary in Beantown as far as I know. Why don't you sing their praises on the Internet this Easter and ask that all the corrupt Catholics to pray that I be crucified by the RCMP soon? I must ask you Chucky why did you support diddlers for years and then suddenly turn coat and support Byron Prior's pursuit of justice after ignoring the fact that I introduced you two to each other four years ago?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

P.S. For the record Chucky this joke is still funny to me and my arse and my balls are as big as ever. Ain't it funny how time slips away and yet some things remain the same? Everybody knows I find you contemptible and why that is so. I do wish you a long life so that you can recall all your sins countless times with your five brains. However I must turn the page my personal history and go back to how I once was before I am dust once more. Life is too short to argue with liars for long or dance with ugly women so to speak. My Baby Boy turns 18 this year thus my job of raising him is largely done. He and his sisters are my best piece work. They all have the records of all my work including this email. (Obviously I sent it from one of my other email accounts to one of my son's for safe keeping before I save it digitally and print it as well.) Before long my son will be the Chief of our Clan and it will be his job to defend my integrity and my deeds for the benefit of my seed as I grin proudly from the grave. He is quite simply the best man I ever met and truly a man of his word. Never underestimate my darling daughters they are tigers in their own right and I raised them not to take shit from anyone. They may prove to be the most trouble for the unethical smiling bastards that are the powers that be right now.

Between men I asked my son to piss on the graves of my enemies someday if I could not do so and he promised that he would. I would not ask my little Darlins to do such a thing out of respect to their gender. As part of my Blood Feud you made the list Chucky Baby. Your Mama will understand why I told my son that in order to pay proper respect to from Whence We Came he really should drink a lot of Keiths beer before he does so. Whereas neither of us like the taste of beer I will leave him to his own chosen poison as long as he enjoys the in and out of it all.

As for me I plan to Rest in Peace in Dorchester someday happy in knowing the fact that I have left at least four very decent folk behind me on this planet. My skull like Yorick's of old will grin like Hell thinking about the fact that the prevailing winds will blow the smell of my rotting corpse towards your old stomping grounds where you no doubt will be buried without any children at all to visit your bones. If you do have kids or an ex wife or two I never read where you admitted it. Dudes like you and your fans such as Dean Roger Ray and the Depupty Dog Robert F. O'Meara are too selfish to make decent loving fathers anyway. If there truly is a Hell like in your dreams Chucky, I will look for you there. I suspect the Devil would promote me to Sergeant at Arms and give me a Black Rod as soon as I landed in order to cram it up your nasty French arse. I have no doubt its hard to get good help in Hell and Satan will need a lot of help pounding on all the evil priests, bankers, lawyers, cops, politicians and the liars like you who supported their malice in this wonderful old world. N'est Pas?

Can one of your five brains tell that you have an ethical pigheaded Maritimer you hates you with a very justifiable passion Chucky Baby? Whereas your buddy Shawny Baby Graham enjoys jokes maybe he will enjoy this one since it is on you. It is not my joke and I give credit where credit is due. I hate it when you or your buddies Dean Roger Ray or the Yankee Stevey Boy Erickson steal my words and claim them as their own while you try to impeach my character at the same time. If anyone doubts that I am the first Chief of the Amos Clan who has every right and duty to defend it fiercely perhaps he should query the dockets of the US District Court in Concord New Hampshire if he knows how.

Whereas everything in the Catholic's heaven and hell is down in three I file My Clan's declaration of Independence for the Keiths within three affidavits in three different matters. I do not file nuisance lawsuits as Yankee blogger hero claims. Danny Boy can post the photo of my nasty arse, my boy and my panhead on the Internet with my knowledge and assent and my blessings and thanx as well. However I still own the rights to it. I need it for my book about you Fake Left Creeps in Fat Fred City and elsewhere. It may be the only thing that I leave my kids that could be worth something someday. Maritimers do love juicy gossip N'est Pas?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

 

The Watchdog, the Whistle-blower, & the Making of a $7Trillion Scandal

$
0
0

 

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/27/business/fund-fees-denounced-mutual-fund-whistleblower-tells-of-beating.html 

 

Fund Fees Denounced; Mutual Fund Whistleblower Tells of Beating

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A whistleblower was dragged from his car and beaten with a brick after confronting an investment-company superior about trading abuses in mutual funds, Peter Scannell told Congress Tuesday.

His complaint about abuses was brushed aside by federal regulators but eventually helped lead to civil fraud charges against fund giant Putnam Investments.

At the hearing where he testified on Tuesday, New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and Sen. Peter Fitzgerald, R-Ill., the head of a Senate panel, denounced what they called hidden and excessive fees that gouge millions of mutual fund investors. Spitzer also said it is unfair that mutual funds charge ordinary shareholders much higher fees than pension funds and other big investors.

Fitzgerald called the fund industry "the world's largest skimming operation ... a trough from which fund managers, brokers and other insiders are steadily siphoning off an excessive slice of the nation's household, college and retirement savings."

Putnam, meanwhile, announced that it would cut fees paid by shareholders and provide investors more information on fees and fund managers' compensation. The company, which has lost billions of dollars from investors since being charged by state and federal authorities -- knocking it from the fifth-largest to the sixth-largest mutual fund concern -- said its move was not prompted by pressure from the regulators.

Besides Boston-based Putnam, a growing number of other fund companies and executives have been accused by state regulators and the Securities and Exchange Commission of improper trading and the defrauding of investors.

The SEC has proposed new rules, and the Senate is weighing legislation to overhaul the $7 trillion mutual fund industry, following overwhelming House passage of such a measure in November.

Scannell said he met with hostility and a veiled threat from the Putnam manager and disinterest from investigators in the SEC's Boston office early last year. It took seven exchanges with his lawyer before the SEC staff met with him, for about an hour and a half, he testified at the hearing of the Senate Governmental Affairs subcommittee.

I "could not believe that the SEC was not acting on what I believed any reasonable regulator would consider being compelling evidence," Scannell said.

He later got a hearing from the office of Massachusetts' secretary of state, which acted on his disclosures.

In a partial settlement with the SEC in November, Putnam agreed to changes -- some of which the company had already begun to implement -- and a process for investors who were harmed to recoup losses. Putnam had already pledged to make restitution. The company neither admitted to nor denied wrongdoing in the accord.

In the Putnam case, participants in the Boilermakers union's retirement fund were accused of engaging in market-timing trades in the mutual funds, quick in-and-out trading to exploit price changes.

Scannell, who worked at a Putnam call center outside Boston, said the time between 3 p.m. and 4 p.m. was called "boilermaker hour" because of the group's aggressive trading.

He said he was assaulted in February 2003, a few days after confronting his supervisor, by a large man in a sweat shirt with "Boilermakers Local 5" written across the chest. The man referred to Scannell's working at Putnam and ordered him to shut up, he testified.

Representatives of the union didn't immediately return a telephone call seeking comment Tuesday.

Scannell said he met with hostility and a veiled threat from the Putnam manager and disinterest from investigators in the SEC's Boston office early last year. It took seven exchanges with his lawyer before the SEC staff met with him, for about an hour and a half, he testified at the hearing of the Senate Governmental Affairs subcommittee.

He said he "could not believe that the SEC was not acting on what I believed any reasonable regulator would consider being compelling evidence."

Scannell said he later got a hearing from the office of Massachusetts' secretary of state, which acted on his disclosures.

In a partial settlement with the SEC in November, Putnam agreed to changes and a process for investors who were harmed to recoup losses.

 

 https://www.bostonmagazine.com/2006/05/15/the-watchdog-the-whistleblower-the-making-of-a-7trillion-scandal-2/

The Watchdog, the Whistle-blower, & the Making of a $7Trillion Scandal

Vitalité Health Network announces new CEO Dr. France Desrosiers

$
0
0

 

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

 

 

Replying to   @alllibertynews and 49 others   

 

#cdnpoli #nbpoli

  

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:37:28 -0400
Subject: Re My right to MEDICARE and NO MORE false imprisonment
To: ethique.ethics@vitalitenb.ca, "thomas.lizotte"
<thomas.lizotte@vitalitenb.ca>, Stephanie.Thebeau@vitalitenb.ca,

Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca, MelanieDawn.Cameron@horizonnb.ca,
info@vitalitenb.ca, benoit.bourque@gnb.ca,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, tom.fetter@gnb.ca,
dave.dell@gnb.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca, "chuck.chiasson"
<chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, MichelleAnne.Duguay@gnb.ca,
Jason.Sully@gnb.ca, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"geoff.regan"<geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "ian.fahie"<ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, DND_MND@forces.gc.ca

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos  @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks Higgy et al are well aware of why I would like to talk to Mr
Alpaugh ASAP particularly after my receiving a very egregious letter
from one of my doctors N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/11/store-owner-furious-with-public-healths.html

#cdnpoli #nbpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-covid-exposure-jeff-alpaugh-case-1.5800648


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:51:52 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I just caught Krissy Baby being a LIAR on
Rogers TV and they cut me off
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

[Le français suit.]

Dear Sir/Madam:

Thank you for taking the time to write to us. Due to the high volume
of emails that we receive daily, please note that there may be a delay
in our response.

Thank you for your understanding.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144

Thank you

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. Tenant
compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement,
il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.

Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.

Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000 Fredericton New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick E3B 5H1 Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Cameron, Melanie Dawn (HorizonNB)"<MelanieDawn.Cameron@horizonnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 01:02:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I just caught Krissy Baby being a LIAR on
Rogers TV and they cut me off
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I will be away from the office returning on Monday, February 24th

Melanie Cameron
Executive Assistant
506-465-4433

------- Horizon Health Network Disclaimer -------

This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is intended
only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended
recipient of this e-mail, any use, review, retransmission, distribution,
dissemination, copying, printing, or other use of, or taking of any action in
reliance upon this e-mail, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the original and any
copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof, immediately. Your
co-operation is appreciated.

Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse uniquement à
son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un organisme, et pourrait
comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes
pas le destinataire du courriel, il est interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de
retransmettre, de distribuer, de disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce
courriel, d'agir en vous y fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon.
Si vous avez reçu le présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer
avec l'expéditeur et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie
électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes
reconnaissants de votre collaboration.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Info (VitaliteNB)"<MelanieDawn.Cameron@horizonnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 01:02:42 +0000
Subject: Réseau de santé Vitalité Health Network
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Nous accusons réception de votre courriel.  Un suivi sera fait dès que possible.

Veuillez prendre note que les messages reçus à cette adresse
électronique sont vérifiés seulement durant les heures d'ouverture de
nos bureaux, soit de 8 heures à 16 heures du lundi au vendredi.  Si
vous avez besoin d'une aide immédiate, composez le 911 ou communiquez
avec l'hôpital le plus près.

Merci!

We acknowledge receipt of your e-mail. A follow-up will be done as
soon as possible.

Please note that messages received at this e-mail address will be
checked during our office hours only, i.e. between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.  If you need immediate assistance, dial 911 or
contact the nearest hospital.

Thank you!



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 20:51:48 -0400
Subject: I just caught Krissy Baby being a LIAR on Rogers TV and they cut me off
To: "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA1KzEXJMR8

Kris Austin, People's Alliance - Voice of the Province - February 20, 2020
19 watching now

Rogers tv
32.1K subscribers


David Amos​ Too too Funny

David Amos​Ask Chucky why i was barred from the leg 2 years before he was

David Amos​ Ask Austin what he thought of the email everyone including
Chucky got on Feb 14th

David Amos​ Asdk Austin what he thinks of my lawsuit against the Crown

David Amos​ Chucky did attend one of the hearings because he and
Vickers are mentioned in the lawsuit

David Amos ​I take false arrest very personally



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:59:18 -0400
Subject: Fwd: YO Mr Higgs Re My right to MEDICARE and NO MORE false
imprisonment Just as I get another bill from Vitalité I hear Horizon
want the RCMP to arrest me AGAIN TRUE or FALSE??? (Out of Office )
To: Rhonda.Brown@globalnews.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "geoff.regan"<geoff.regan@parl.gc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "ian.fahie"<ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, david.akin@globalnews.ca

Need I say that I am tired of being called a perennial candidate on TV?


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/05/before-writs-were-dropped-in-bc-and-ns.html


Monday, 22 May 2017

Before writs were dropped in BC and NS The VERY UNETHICAL "Journalist"
David Akin scores a new job as CHIEF POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT Global
News???
Methinks that by now mindless David Akin would have figured out that
just like one of my favourite artists Gordy Lightfoot I am still alive
and kicking. However if you scroll to the bottom of this blog you will
see byway of his Tweets Davey Boy continues to ignore my emails even
after I talk to his lawyer and send them both a Hell of an email.  Go
figure why I am not surprised. EH Commissioner Bobby Paulson of the
RCMP?

Do tell does the CBC or the CRTC or CTV or Roger TV or even CPAC or
anyone else recall back in 2015 when I stress tested the ethics of
David Boy Akin and his gal pal Kady Baby O'Malley about voting etc
during and after the election of the 42nd Parliament? I did that years
after I talked to Akin the first in in 2004 when he worked for CTV and
about 2 years or so after Kady had blocked me within Twitter when she
and her snobby buddies such as Jesse Brown, Jian Ghomeshi, Greg Weston
and Evan Solomon used to work for CBC too.

https://globalnews.ca/author/rhonda-brown/

Rhonda Brown
Supervising Producer
902 481 4440

Rhonda is a journalist with more than 24 years experience in the
television industry.

As Supervising Producer, she works with news staff in Halifax and New
Brunswick in the gathering the day’s stories and getting them to air
on Global News at 6 pm.

Born in Newfoundland and raised in Ottawa, she’s lived in Halifax for
more than 22 years.

She’s held a variety of roles with both Global News and CBC over her
career, with a brief foray into public relations.

A perennial candidate is a political candidate who frequently runs for
an elected office and rarely, if ever, wins. The term is the opposite
of an incumbent politician who repeatedly defends their seats
successfully.

Perennial candidates can vary widely in nature. Some are independents
who lack the support of the major political parties in an area or are
members of alternative parties (such as third parties in the United
States). Others may be mainstream candidates who can consistently win
a party's nomination, but because their district is gerrymandered or a
natural safe seat for another party, the candidate likewise never gets
elected (thus these types are often paper candidates). Still others
may typically run in primary elections for a party's nomination and
lose repeatedly. Numerous perennial candidates, although not all, run
with the full knowledge of their inability to win elections and
instead use their candidacy for satire, to advance non-mainstream
political platforms, or to take advantage of benefits afforded
political candidates (such as campaign financing, name recognition,
and television advertising benefits).





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Rédaction <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 09:17:12 -0800
Subject: Re: Fwd: YO Mr Higgs Re My right to MEDICARE and NO MORE
false imprisonment Just as I get another bill from Vitalité I hear
Horizon want the RCMP to arrest me AGAIN TRUE or FALSE??? (Out of
Office )
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Nous avons reçu votre message. Au besoin, nous communiquerons avec
vous pour plus de détails. Si vous avez des informations
supplémentaires à fournir, s'il vous plaît, répondez à ce courriel.
Merci de votre intérêt envers l'Acadie Nouvelle.


--

Salle des nouvelles
Acadie Nouvelle
[image]




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 17:17:13 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Higgs Re My right to MEDICARE and NO
MORE false imprisonment Just as I get another bill from Vitalité I
hear Horizon want the RCMP to arrest me AGAIN TRUE or FALSE??? (Out of
Office )
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 13:17:08 -0400
Subject: Fwd: YO Mr Higgs Re My right to MEDICARE and NO MORE false
imprisonment Just as I get another bill from Vitalité I hear Horizon
want the RCMP to arrest me AGAIN TRUE or FALSE??? (Out of Office )
To: "jordan.gill"<jordan.gill@cbc.ca>, info@vitalitenb.ca,
info@chautva.com, Annie.Levasseur@chautva.com,
nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com, darsenault@allnovascotia.com,
huras.adam@brunswicknews.com, bajer.erica@brunswicknews.com,
dgnews@brunswicknews.com, restigouche@acadienouvelle.com, news
<news@chco.tv>, nouvelles@cimt.ca, mike.cameron3@bellmedia.ca,
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, callum.smith@globalnews.ca,
megan.yamoah@globalnews.ca, silas.brown@globalnews.ca,
travis.fortnum@globalnews.ca, cbcnb@cbc.ca, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
"bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Michael.Duheme"
<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Qualite.Quality@vitalitenb.ca,
"Serge.Cormier"<Serge.Cormier@parl.gc.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, media@horizonnb.ca, Kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca

CHAU-TV
324 boulevard St-Pierre Ouest
Caraquet, New Brunswick,
E1W 1A3         
Annie Levasseur
Email : info@chautva.com
Annie.Levasseur@chautva.com
Phone : (506) 727-4417


L'Acadie Nouvelle - Bureau de Caraquet 
476, boulevard Saint-Pierre ouest
C.P. 5536
Caraquet, Nouveau-Brunswick,
 E1W 1B7
Mathieu Roy-Comeau
Téléphone : 506 450-6103 (bureau)
Téléphone : 506 470-2413
nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com,

Vitalité Health Network
275 Main Street, Suite 600
Bathurst NB  E2A 1A9
Telephone: 506-544-2133
Toll-free: 1-888-472-2220
Fax: 506-544-2145
info@vitalitenb.ca

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/ceo-stands-behind-er-1.5466866

Vitalité CEO stands behind postponed emergency room proposals


Proposals 'were very good, were very sound, were evidence based,' said
Gilles Lanteigne

Jordan Gill · CBC News · Posted: Feb 18, 2020 10:33 AM AT

28 Comments

David Amos
Methinks Gilles Lanteigne and I should finally have a long talk ASAP N'esy Pas?



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 15:33:02 -0400
Subject: Fwd: YO Mr Higgs Re My right to MEDICARE and NO MORE false
imprisonment Just as I get another bill from Vitalité I hear Horizon
want the RCMP to arrest me AGAIN TRUE or FALSE???
To: perthelkslodge362@gmail.com, "Andrew.Harvey"
<andrew.harvey@gnb.ca>, "bruce.fitch"<bruce.fitch@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "Macfarlane, Bruce (DH/MS)"
<Bruce.Macfarlane@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "benoit.bourque"
<benoit.bourque@gnb.ca>, "Brian.kenny"<brian.kenny@gnb.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 22:41:47 -0400
Subject: Re: YO Mr Higgs Re My right to MEDICARE and NO MORE false
imprisonment Just as I get another bill from Vitalité I hear Horizon
want the RCMP to arrest me AGAIN TRUE or FALSE???
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Gerry.Lowe@gnb.ca,
"Jennifer.duggan"<Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Sandra.lofaro"
<Sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
"Roger.Brown"<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>,
bachfoundation@horizonnb.ca, chalmers.foundation@horizonnb.ca,
MelanieDawn.Cameron@horizonnb.ca, friends@horizonnb.ca,
bpendrel@xplornet.com, joyvantassel@hotmail.com,
mrhfoundation@horizonnb.ca, smhfoundation@horizonnb.ca,
1945smha@gmail.com, SJRH.Foundation@horizonnb.ca,
SCCRFoundation@horizonnb.ca, urvhfoundation@horizonnb.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "rob.moore"
<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, robmoorefundy <robmoorefundy@gmail.com>,
votejohnw <votejohnw@gmail.com>

https://en.horizonnb.ca/home/ways-to-give/foundations.aspx



At Horizon Health Network we are extremely appreciative for the
support of our Foundations, Auxiliaries, and Alumnae.  These
organizations provide funding and support for much needed equipment,
programs and projects.  This support continues to allow Horizon Health
Network to provide the best possible patient care. Our volunteers are
equally important as they provide much needed emotional support and
assist with our patient care by reading, writing, cooking, delivering
flowers, or sitting with someone who might not have family nearby.

Whichever way you choose to give, your gift is valued and appreciated.

Foundations
Auxiliaries
Alumnae
Volunteer
Foundations
Bennett and Albert County Health Care Foundation
Chalmers Regional Hospital Foundation
Charlotte County Hospital Foundation
Friends of The Moncton Hospital Foundation
Grand Manan Hospital Foundation
Harvey Community Hospital Foundation
Hotel-Dieu of St. Joseph Hospital Foundation
Miramichi Regional Hospital Foundation
Oromocto Public Hospital Foundation
Rexton and Area Health Care Foundation
Sackville Memorial Hospital Foundation
Saint John Regional Hospital Foundation
St. Joseph's Hospital Foundation
Stan Cassidy Foundation
Sussex Health Care Centre Foundation
Tobique Valley Health Care Foundation
Upper River Valley Hospital Foundation
Wauklehegan Manor/MacLean Memorial Hospital Foundation



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:30:16 -0500
Subject: Re: YO Mr Higgs Re My right to MEDICARE and NO MORE false
imprisonment Just as I get another bill from Vitalité I hear Horizon
want the RCMP to arrest me AGAIN TRUE or FALSE??? (Out of Office )
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

I am out of the office until Tuesday, February 18 and have
intermittent access to Email.  For any urgencies, please contact
Jennifer Duggan, General Counsel, at 613 825 2981, or my admin
assistant, Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540..

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'à mardi 18 février, et j'aurai un accès
intermittent aux courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez
communiquer avec Jennifer Duggan, Avocate générale, au 613 825 2981,
ou avec mon adjointe admin. Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.


>>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> 02/14/20 19:29 >>>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 20:29:13 -0400
Subject: YO Mr Higgs Re My right to MEDICARE and NO MORE false
imprisonment Just as I get another bill from Vitalité I hear Horizon
want the RCMP to arrest me AGAIN TRUE or FALSE???
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, dale.morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
<barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>
Cc: "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, David Amos
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
<mike.holland@gnb.ca>, lclark@nbpower.com,
colleen.dentremont@atlanticaenergy.org, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Office of the
Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, wharrison
<wharrison@nbpower.com>, gthomas <gthomas@nbpower.com>,
Andrea.AndersonMason@gnb.ca, jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, news
<news@dailygleaner.com>, nben@nben.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>,
"dominic.leblanc.c1"<dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@gnb.ca>,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"Ginette.PetitpasTaylor"<Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca>,
"Sherry.Wilson"<Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "mary.wilson"
<mary.wilson@gnb.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
"nick.brown"<nick.brown@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>,
"Tim.RICHARDSON"<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "Trevor.Holder"
<Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca>, "rick.desaulniers"<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>,
"michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"
<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "carl. davies"<carl.davies@gnb.ca>,
"carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, "Cathy.Rogers"
<Cathy.Rogers@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Roger.L.Melanson"<roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca>, "ron.tremblay2"
<ron.tremblay2@gmail.com>, philippe@dunsky.com,
Steven_Reid3@carleton.ca, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>,
"sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>

Methinks it must be because of my recent comments in CBC about your
nonsense about emergency Rooms etc N’esy Pas???

Here is just a few that are recorded within my blog etc


https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/02/deputy-premier-must-decide-whether-to.html


Wednesday, 12 February 2020

Deputy premier must decide whether to fall in line on health-care
reforms, Higgs says



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-doctor-sackville-hospital-emergency-room-closure-1.5462252


Doctor shortage forces overnight closure at Sackville ER

More er closures are possible before hours are permanently reduced on March 11

CBC News · Posted: Feb 13, 2020 11:32 AM AT



57 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


David Amos
Content disabled
Go Figure These are obviously not my Tweets but I did run against the lady


Chisholm Pothier
@chisholmp
·
Feb 10
The plan hasn’t even been announced yet and it’s already being
condemned. We know one thing for sure - we cannot keep delivering
Health the way we have. It isn’t sustainable with an aging population
and needs have changed with demographic change anyway. #nbpoli /1

Quote Tweet
Alaina Lockhart
@AlainaLockhart
· Feb 9
Premier @BlaineHiggs you can’t grow NB by reducing services in rural
areas. NB needs strong rural comms to thrive. The @townofsussex is key
to the region. You need to start thinking about the people impacted in
your quest to improve the bottom line.
https://twitter.com/nsteinbach_rc/


David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Amos: Chisholm Pothier no longer speaks for the
government Correct?









David Amos
Need I say I got a few calls after supper last night and the people
who called could tell I was pretty cranky about something? Trust that
what I heard on CBC this morning did not help my mood any..






David Amos
Methinks the real problem is that Higgy and Flemming can't get enough
bilingual folks who want to work within our Health Care System N'esy
Pas?

David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: Methinks everybody knows since the time of
Trudeau The Elder New Brunswick has been a great place to grow up and
get an education but to find work most of our young ones must head
west somewhere on the far side of Quebec. If the truth hurts so be it
N'esy Pas?







David Amos
On CBC this morning I heard our mindless Health Minister direct folks
to the emergency room in another province. Methinks we have not heard
that last about that N'esy Pas??







Jim Cyr
The people of New Brunswick are some of the silliest people in the
world. It’s been hilarious to see almost all of them completely turn
off their brains and freak out over Higgs’ emergency rooms plan. The
people will now vote out the PCs, of course......just as their silly
media masters tell them to do. And so the NB medical/fiscal/poverty
situation will just get worse and worse and worse than it already is..
You can’t make this kind of stuff up, folks!! Amazing to see.
Mind-numbingly predictable and monotonous. It’s like kubuki theater at
this point.. BAD kubuki theater.....lol

David Amos
Reply to @Jim Cyr: Methinks you may be cluing in as to why I call this
a circus If you can't find fun in the madness then you will go crazy
like they claim I am. Yea I'm crazy alright. Some say I'm crazy like a
fox others say I am just another narcissistic fool Hard telling not
knowing for sure but one thing is for certain I am having fun laughing
at all the people who laughed at me N'esy Pas?

However I can be as crazy as i want to be Higgy should ask the shinks
in the loonie bin of the DECH what they did with the wiretap tape of
the mob that I gave them in 2008 that the RCMP refuse to investigate.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Jim Cyr:
Silly? It's just plain "goofy". And once the CONServatives are gone,
having been exchanged for the Liberals, the process will repeat
itself, over and over.
Not one among us able to figure out the only end result is our pocket
remain empty.









Michael Durant
We need to begin serious talks with Doctors Without Boarders

David Amos
Reply to @Michael durant: Try again That one went over like a lead balloon

Ben Haroldson
Reply to @Michael durant: borders








Yves Savoie
Get your popcorn ready!!! The circus has begun....

David Amos
Reply to @Yves Savoie: Wanna trade some of your popcorn for peanuts?

Methinks Trump and everybody knows I have been enjoying the circuses
on both sides of the 49th for many years from the peanut galley.
Trump's minions know that just before July 4th, 2002 within a
statement of Claim against an incredible number of Yankee lawyers I
promised that I would run in the next Election in Canada. I have
remained true to my word and have run 7 times thus far. I joined the
clowns in the centre ring no only to to add my two bits worth and but
to witness the high diving acts up close and personal. Trust that
Harper and Higgy et al know that i dearly love the splash just my kids
and I did at Sea World a long long time ago N'esy Pas?

Ben Haroldson
Reply to @David Amos: Kudos to that, and if you were in my riding you
would get my vote, fed or prov.

Lou Bell
Reply to @Ben Haroldson: That would give him 14 votes

Lou Bell
Reply to @David Amos: " Methinks trumps and everybody knows I have
been enjoy.. .... ...... " !!! You really think trump knows who you
are ?? Seriously ???????????

David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Do you want his lawyers cell number?

David Amos
Reply to @Lou Bell: Better yet do you want me to give them yours so
you can say hey to your Yankee heroes who locked me up in 2004?

David Amos
Reply to @Ben Haroldson: Thanks for the vote of confidence









Ben Haroldson
The Doctors are just helping to move things along. No sense waffling
if things are that dire.

David Amos
Reply to @Ben Haroldson: So you say







Terry Tibbs
What do you *think*? Coincidence, or not?

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks we all know the wicked game by now N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: BTW I was born in the Sackville Hospital in 1952
and it saved my butt 3 years later when I went into a coma for a
month. Methinks for that reason alone I should raise hell to defend
it. Methinks it should be rather obvious that I quite simply don't
care what my cousin Megan Mitton and all her Green Party pals say or
do about it N'esy Pas?

Holly Mossing
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Not coincidence: ERs and Labour and Delivery
units have been randomly closing for years due to staffing issues.
That’s part of the problem, and this move will be part of the
solution. Government being responsible by listening to the health
authorities.










SarahRose Werner
How is the pool of doctors who provide nighttime ER coverage supplied?
Are these doctors who also work day jobs? Does staffing the ER
overnight make doctors less accessible to patients who seek service
during the day?

Elaine MacDonald
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Overnight Doctors come from the family
practice doctors; so while some work the ER during the day, those who
work nights will also work office hours during the day before their
night shift starts. After midnight, the ER is emergencies only, so you
will be triaged by a nurse, then depending on the triage, you may or
may not see a doctor.

This Friday, from how it seems, there will be no doctor at all; I'm
not sure if a tirage nurse will assess people however.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Elaine MacDonald: Apparently not, because the ER will be
closed entirely. Which makes sense because triage is a sorting
procedure, not a treatment procedure. The word "triage" comes from the
process of sorting battlefield patients into three levels: those will
recover even without treatment, those who will even if treated and
those for whom treatment will make a difference. If there's no one
available to provide treatment, there's no point doing triage.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Elaine MacDonald: "Overnight Doctors come from the family
practice doctors; so while some work the ER during the day, those who
work nights will also work office hours during the day before their
night shift starts." - I'm not surprised that doctors who've already
worked during the day are averse to taking overnight shifts as well.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @SarahRose Werner:
Why would they be "adverse"? If the "stories" told to us are true,
after supper the family practice doctor heads out to the ER for 7pm,
taking paperwork, or reading material, to catch up on.
Right around maybe 10, or 11pm they pull up a bed and have a snooze,
because there "might" be only 5 patients overnight, (this is "the
claim") maybe only one needing his/her attention, so the nurse can
wake him/her up as required. 7am the shift ends, doctor leaves fully
rested,12 hours pay richer.
In some cases, if the doctor lives real close, they go home, coming in
only if needed.

Holly Mossing
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Yes, it does, which is part of the
problem. These are great shifts for doctors to pick up (quiet and pay
very well), but don’t help the health of local people overall because
the doc may see 5 urgent patients overnight but not be able to work at
see *25* the next day. That’s a big capacity issue.

David Amos
Reply to @Elaine MacDonald: Its a pity that nobody in Sackville would
listen to me this week

David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: However I will disclose that the Office of the
CEO of one of our Health Care systems called me a few days before
Flemming's big announcement in order to reach an understanding as to
why I am going to file a lawsuitin order to get my Medicare Card and
other things. I have heard nothing but crickets since. Methinks they
think I am bluffing Others know I am not N'esy Pas?











Ian Scott
It would help if the management would outline what it takes to have an
ER open 24/7. I do not think a lot of the public has a clue as to what
it means to open an ER to all comers and the staff then needed to
cover all reasonable issues. You cannot confuse the public and
ambulances etc where to go each night if staffing gets short. It makes
it worse. If you staff with general practice then they must have
extended training in ER issues. Otherwise the next thing is the
complaint that things were not done . Then comes the standard
equipment needed for stroke trauma etc, like CT scanners etc. Even
appendectomy becomes an issue without ultrasound or CT. Its really a
standard of practice and it requires a service level that is very
difficult to reach in small centers. Otherwise you just end up
shipping people out again and delaying diagnostics and the right
treatment, some of which are time related. Would you want surgery for
something that is not needed? Or have blood thinners given when you
actually have a brain bleed etc.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Ian Scott: One thing I've been reading in comments on
stories on this issue is that people mention being "stabilized" in a
smaller centre before being shipped out to a larger one. Not being a
medical professional, I don't know what resources and skills are
required to "stabilize" patients. Is this something that could be
achieved in some other way, for example, by expanded and improved
paramedic service?

Ian Scott
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: That is the care in bigger centers, well
trained paramedics to stabilize at site and transport. Still most
stroke issues need CT before treatment. Heart issues may be
"stabilized" with drugs etc but transfer really is key for assessment
. Trauma , (major) , needs a trauma center. I am not sure how many
paramedics can intubate in the field at this point in NB but even an
acute asthma or allergic issue might need it. Its what has been
suggested. The numbers are small in many of these towns.Even having
those staff may prove difficult down the road. Helicopter Air
ambulance is another issue, complex and expensive but out there.
Freddy is a trauma center for a certain level , but even it only has a
snowfield for landing.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Ian Scott: Okay, so if someone has a heart attack, acute
allergic attack, stroke, etc. in Sussex in the middle of the night and
that person needs some sort of immediate treatment to tide them over
until they get to the Saint John Regional, how is that provided? To
me, that's the crux of the issue here. I agree that 24/7 ER service in
all locations is not the answer. What are other possible answers?

Elaine MacDonald
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: In that situation, the patient will be
sent on to Saint John/Moncton (not sure which hospital in regards to
Sussex) regardless if they are stable or not.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Elaine MacDonald: Are there increased to the patient if
they're sent on without stabilization? What are those? What will be
done to ameliorate those risks?

Holly Mossing
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: There is a great study on this that showed
that cardiac patients who were “stabilized” at a small center then
transferred had worse outcomes and a higher death rate than patients
who bypassed their local ER and were brought directly to where they
could receive specialized care, for example. (
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/28615177/ ). Advanced care
paramedics need to be normalized in New Brunswick and supported to
make health care as safe as possible. I’ve never voted Conservative
but in this case Higgs’ government is doing absolutely the responsible
thing. We need to make sure they follow through with increased daytime
services.

David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks you must have read some of my
comments N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Hmmmm










Donald Smith
There has to be a reason, or reasons why NB Cannot attract them ???????

Mack Leigh
Reply to @Donald Smith: There definitely is however no one is allowed
to talk about the " Elephant " in the room.

Ian Scott
Reply to @Mack Leigh: Major centers are not really having that issue
except for OR constraints for time for some specialists and no beds
because of acute care bed blockers. Bathurst has excellent docs as
does Edmonston and they are better at language issues than the south.
Freddy and SJ and the Moncton centers also attract excellent staff.
Its in between that is the issue , and medicine has changed , as have
expectations and the standard of care. An ER is just that , all
comers, not a clinic. One has to meet rigid standards of care. And
those are hard to meet in 4k population or less towns and villages.
Aging issues are one of the biggest issues and its being met poorly.
Billing numbers are a thing of the past so not in the question. There
could certainly be some concern I suppose of young docs worried about
potential language issues but low.

Elaine MacDonald
Reply to @Ian Scott: What people seem to forget is that Sackville,
while a population of 5000 including Mt. Allison students, also
services Dorchester, Memramcook, Port Elgin, Murry Corner as well as
we get patients from the Cape like Cocagne, Cap Pele, Shediac. We've
had people from Moncton and surrounding area come to our hospital in
increasing numbers over the past two years, even as far as Anagance,
AND we get people from NS as well like River Hebert and Amherst. It
isn't just NB, but NS we serve too.

So no, we don't have a 4K or less patient possibility, we have much
more than that.

SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Elaine MacDonald: Then maybe NS would like to contribute
some money to pay for overnight service at the ER.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @SarahRose Werner:
Don't you believe for a moment they don't.
Show an out of province medicare card at a NB hospital and the eyes
light up like a one armed bandit hitting a jackpot.

David Amos
Reply to @Donald Smith: Everybody knows the reasons

David Amos
Reply to @Mack Leigh: I do








Brian Robertson
This is just the logical next step in the deterioration of healthcare
under the thumb of a government administered monopoly.
When you have no money and no Doctors and costs are still increasing
because all your workers are members of public service unions that can
hold the public hostage; what else can happen?
The viability of single payer healthcare is based on the metering of
services in order to control costs.
Public needs and individual abilities to pay simply do not factor into
the equation.

Terry Tibbs
Reply to @Brian Robertson:
Hold the phone, Just STOP, and *think* for a moment, you have been
misdirected just like you are supposed to be.
EVERY other province, or territory, has "evil" union belonging health
professionals, this is not a NB only "thing".
We are supposed to be short of 100, maybe 200, health professionals
needed per capita (a different number pops out whenever those in
charge are asked).
We know the pay and benefits in NB are "short" hence the shortage of
health professionals.
Yet the cost of healthcare is higher (per capita) than every other
province, or territory.
So, either EVERYONE in NB is constantly sick, or the extra cost is
somewhere else other than with the health professionals.
I respectfully *think* you should be looking elsewhere.

Brian Robertson
Reply to @Terry Tibbs:
All Provincial healthcare systems are following the same pattern
decline; except possibly Quebec who enjoys a lucrative infusion of
Federal transfer payments annually. New Brunswick just seems to be
ahead of the curve in terms of declining services and wait times.
There is more than enough blame to go around for this spiral trip
around the drain. Yes, and that includes your healthcare
professionals.

David Amos
Reply to @Terry Tibbs: Methinks he knows you are correct Quebec is a
UNILINGUAL Province Hence its costs are less N'esy Pas?





John Pokiok
There you have it no Doctor wants to live in rural setting it's a hard
core fact.

Ian Scott
Reply to @John Pokiok: Thats not really true. Being an ER doc is a
different fish from a GP office setting. It requires an extension of
training.If you open an ER then you have every issue from Intubation
to trauma to poisoning, heart attack stroke, delivery etc. ER trained
docs are a separate entity . You are asking a GP to be everything and
have little backup and extended hours and then have a practice in the
community. It takes a serious block of staff to do this around the
clock. And to have surgical backups for obstetrics etc.And to then
live in communities with 4K people is not easy.

David Amos
Reply to @John Pokiok: Many do when they retire

Elaine MacDonald
Reply to @John Pokiok: And yet we just had *2* doctors from US
background move to Sackville to practice. It's not a matter of no
doctors wanting to move to rural areas.

David Amos
Reply to @Elaine MacDonald: Maybe they are willing to cover the midnight shift


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:55:17 +0000
Subject: RE: YO Tom Freda Say Hey Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
of CBC for me will ya?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>
>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>>  Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I.                    Introduction
>
> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>
> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III.               Issue
>
> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV.              Analysis
>
> A.                 Standard of Review
>
> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>
> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
> supporting a cause of action.
>
> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>
> V.                 Conclusion
> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
> without leave to amend.
> "Wyman W. Webb"
> J.A.
> "David G. Near"
> J.A.
> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
> J.A.
>
>
>
> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>
> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
> DOCKET:
>
> A-48-16
>
>
>
> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>
>
> PLACE OF HEARING:
>
> Fredericton,
> New Brunswick
>
> DATE OF HEARING:
>
> May 24, 2017
>
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
> DATED:
>
> October 30, 2017
>
> APPEARANCES:
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
> (on his own behalf)
>
> Jan Jensen
>
>
> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>
> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
> Nathalie G. Drouin
> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>
> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>

 

 

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/vitalit%C3%A9-announce-new-ceo-1.5814219

 

Vitalité Health Network announces new CEO

Dr. France Desrosiers will replace the outgoing CEO Gilles Lanteigne on Nov. 30

 

CBC News· Posted: Nov 24, 2020 1:28 PM AT

 


Dr. France Desrosiers is a family physician who has held management roles in the health network for 19 years. (Radio-Canada/François Vigneault)

A new CEO has been named for the Vitalité Health Network, one of the province's two health authorities.

Dr. France Desrosiers will replace the outgoing CEO Gilles Lanteigne on November 30.

In a news release, Vitalité said Desrosiers is a family physician who has held management roles in the health network for 19 years, "including most recently as vice-president of medical services, training and research."

"Dr. Desrosiers knows our health-care system first-hand and her experience as a physician and executive leadership member will be definite assets for Vitalité Health Network and our province," said Health Minister Dorothy Shephard in the same release.

Desrosiers was not available for an interview, according to Vitalité.

The start of Desrosiers term will be marked by both a health crisis and a push to change the way health care is delivered in the province.

COVID-19

New Brunswick is in the midst of a second wave of COVID-19 infections with 89 active cases of the disease in the province as of Tuesday.

The wave has potential to grow as several schools have reported positive cases and there have been warnings about possible public exposures in a number of businesses and restaurants.

On Monday, Desrosiers' soon-to-be counterpart warned that an increase in COVID-19 cases could spell trouble for the province's hospitals.

"We could easily be overwhelmed with a very few new cases," said Karen McGrath, CEO of the Horizon Health Network.

Rethinking health care

The province has also promised to review the way healthcare is delivered in the province.

Last winter,  Premier Blaine Higgs announced reductions in emergency room hours at several smaller hospitals.

After less than a week of intense pressure, he backed down from that decision, but promised to study the delivery of health care.

That was supposed to include public consultations that have been postponed twice, because of COVID-19 and September's election.

But Shephard told CBC News that she hopes to have consultations complete by March 2021.

"Much of this is probably going have to be done virtually, but we want to make sure we get the biggest possible participation we can get in these COVID times," said Shephard.

 

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

 

 

 

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:42:46 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE NB Mental Hospitals etc Why not ask Brad Green's
former assistant Chucky Murray and his blogging buddy Chucky Leblanc
about the document hereto attached?
To: viltide@nb.sympatico.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca,
kris.austin@gnb.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
brian.gallant@gnb.ca, robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Colin.McPhail@cbc.ca

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/tide-head-school-closure-policy-409-mayor-randy-hunter-1.5070564

Village mayor fights to give school on the chopping block a 2nd act
Small Tide Head School was voted to close after years of declining enrolment
Colin McPhail · CBC News · Posted: Mar 26, 2019 6:00 AM AT


Tide Head Village Office

6 Mountain St.
Tide Head, NB
Phone: (506) 789-6550
Fax: (506) 789-6553
Email: viltide@nb.sympatico.ca
 

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:07:11 -0400
Subject: RE NB Mental Hospitals etc Why not ask Brad Green's former
assistant Chucky Murray and his blogging buddy Chucky Leblanc about
the document hereto attached?
To: info@campbellton.org, normand.pelletier@dalhousie.ca, lebrun@nb.aibn.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Alysha.Elliott@gnb.ca,
hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca


On 3/25/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/restigouche-hospital-youth-centre-ombud-report-northern-mayors-1.5066125
>
> North-south tension rises as leaders fear losing troubled youth mental
> health centre
>
> Northern mayors say moving centre out of Campbellton would be major loss
> Colin McPhail · CBC News · Posted: Mar 25, 2019 6:00 AM AT
>
> https://healthstandards.org/board-directors/george-weber/
>
> https://healthstandards.org/executive-team/
> Health Standards Organization
> 1150 Cyrville Road
> Ottawa, ON, Canada
> K1J 7S9
>
> Phone
> +1 613-738-3800
>
> Leslee J. Thompson ext 222
>
> George Weber
> Board Chair
>
> George Weber has served as President and CEO of the Royal Ottawa
> Health Care Group, one of four standalone specialized mental health
> facilities in Ontario, since 2007.
>
> Over the previous 26 years, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of
> a number of national organizations, such as the Canadian Red Cross and
> Canadian Dental Association, as well as various international
> organizations, including the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
> Societies in Geneva, Switzerland.
>
> Throughout his career, he has been involved in health and humanitarian
> work from multiple dimensions, including dental accreditation. George
> holds a Master’s degree from McGill University and has completed the
> Advanced Management Program from the Graduate School of Business
> Administration, Harvard University, the International Program for
> Board Members from the Institute of Management Development in
> Lausanne, Switzerland and the Directors course sponsored by the
> Institute of Corporate Directors and the Rotman School of Management,
> University of Toronto.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 14:30:57 -0400
> Subject: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of Ombud NB too After all
> he is the same politically appointed lawyer N'esy Pas?
> To: premier@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
> andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
> robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch@gmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> ---------- Original  message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:13:29 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of your
> Acting Integrity Commissioner N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original  message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:13:26 -0400
> Subject: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of your Acting Integrity
> Commissioner N'esy Pas?
> To: premier@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
> andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.cabrian.gallant@gnb.ca,
> robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
> rick.desaulniers@gnb.camichelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.c, mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre
> andre@jafaust.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpOY5yzB9-8
>
> New Brunswick Ombudsman Charles Murray on report regarding The
> Restigouche Hostipal Centre!
> 119 views
> Charles Leblanc
> Published on Feb 8, 2019
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
> Subject: You wished to speak with me
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
> years.
>
>
> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
> productive use of either of our time.
>
>
> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
> given due consideration.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Charles Murray
>
> Ombud NB
>
> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:09:18 -0300
> Subject: So your buddy Charles Murray has my documents now N'esy Pas
> Chucky Baby?
> To: charles.murray@gnb.ca, Charles.McAllister@snb.ca, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25
> <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kim.macpherson@gnb.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, briangallant10
> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, execdirgen <execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>
>
> CBC
> 3 new watchdogs appointed
> Premier names child and youth advocate, official languages
> commissioner and ombudsman
> CBC News Posted: Jun 14, 2013 3:24 PM
>
>
> The new ombudsman is Charles Murray, a civil servant and former
> political assistant to one-time Tory MP Elsie Wayne and to former PC
> cabinet minister Brad Green.
>
> "I am confident that their experience and education will help them to
> carry out their respective duties effectively," said Premier David
> Alward.
>
> He said Murray's appointment is not political.
>
> YEA RIGHT DAVEY BABY
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbDs3NUo-Nk
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Evelyn Greene
> To: charles.mcallister@snb.ca ; blaine.higgs@gnb.ca ;
> kim.macpherson@gnb.ca ; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ;
> david.alward@gnb.ca ; charles.murray@gnb.ca ; madeleine.dube@gnb.ca ;
> ken.ross@gnb.ca
> Cc: don.forestell@gnb.ca ; dhashey@coxandpalmer.com
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 6:32 PM
> Subject: RE: Ambulance New Brunswick Inc.
>
>
> Dear Mr. McAllister:  Ambulance New Brunswick Inc. is also CROWN
> CORPORATION UNDER PART III OF THE PUBLIC LABOR RELATIONS ACT, AND WHY
> WOULD NOT NOT KNOW THAT.  PLEASE ADVISE.  ALSO, MS. RENEE LAFOREST
> DOES NOT GET BACK TO ME.  DO YOU HAVE HER EMAIL.  MY FRIEND SALLY AND
> I WENT THERE TODAY AND WAS TOLD THAT SHE WAS IN A MEETING.  SO WHO
> MAKES THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE THE BOOKS AS PER THE
> PUBLIC RIGHTS AS TAXPAYERS?
>
>
> EVELYN GREENE  ALSO, THE LETTERS PATENT ARE NOT WITNESSED AS PER THE
> REGULATIONS UNDER THE COMPANY'S ACT.  COULD YOU COMMENT ABOUT THAT.
> WHY WOULD IT HAVE GONE THRU YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PROPER ATTENTION TO
> THE LAWYER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THE CO. THAT ALL IS IN COMPLIANCE
> WHICH IT ISN'T. LOOK AT THE DOCUMENTS FOR MEDAVIE EMS AND NB EMS AND
> TELL ME IF THEY WERE WITNESSED PROPERLY?
>
> SEND THIS ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INCLUDING DAVID HASHEY'S CLIENT,
> DONALD PETERS AND CHARLES MURRAY WHO BY WAY OF THE LEGISLATION ARE IN
> CONFLICT BY BEING ON THE BOARDS.  PLEASE CONFIRM?  I WANT TO KNOW HOW
> TO ACCESS THE BOOKS OF AMBULANCE N.B. INC. WHICH IS A PUBLIC
> CORPORATION WHICH IS PARTNERED WITH ANOTHER CO. N.B. EMS WHICH IS
> PARTNERED WITH MEDAVIE EMS MAKING THEM ALL SUBSIDIARIES AND ALL
> SHAREHOLDERS OF THE SUBSIDIARIES CAN GET LOAN GUARANTEES AND OTHER
> BENEFITS BUT WHY WAS THIS DEAL NOT PUT OUT FOR A COST ANALYSIS AND
> BIDDING AS PER THE RULES?
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Charles.McAllister@snb.ca
> To: evelyngreene@live.ca
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:49:31 -0400
> Subject: Ambulance New Brunswick Inc.
>
>
> This is further to our discussion today.
>
>
>
> As indicated, this company is incorporated and subject to the
> Companies Act. You can access the Act at the following link:
>
> http://laws.gnb.ca/en/BrowseTitle
>
>
>
> The company’s head office location is as follows: Department  of
> Health, 520  King Street, Fredericton. You had asked me exactly where
> at 520 King Street is the head office. An ANB official indicates it is
> at the fourth floor of 520 King Street –which is occupied as well by
> offices of the Dept of Health.
>
>
>
> You indicated you wish to attend and examined certain records of ANB.
> I have provided you with a contact name: Renee LaForest (phone number
> 453-3759). It is our understanding she is the secretary-treasurer of
> ANB.
>
>
>
> I have indicated under the Companies Act, the relevant provisions
> regarding access is as follows:
>
>
>
> BOOKS OF THE COMPANY
>
> 104The company shall cause books to be kept by the secretary, or by
> some other officer or agent specially charged with that duty, wherein
> shall be kept recorded
>
> (a)a copy of the letters patent incorporating the company, and any
> supplementary letters patent, and of all by-laws of the company;
>
> (b)the names alphabetically arranged of all persons who are or have
> been shareholders;
>
> (c)the address and calling of every such person while a shareholder,
> as far as can be ascertained;
>
> (d)the number of shares of stock held by each shareholder;
>
> (e)the amounts paid in and remaining unpaid respectively on the stock
> of each shareholder;
>
> (f)all transfers of stocks, with the date and other particulars of the
> transfer, and the date of the entry thereof;
>
> (g)the names, addresses and callings of all persons who are or have
> been directors of the company, with the several dates at which each
> became or ceased to be a director;
>
> (h)minutes of all meetings of shareholders, directors and executive
> committee.
>
> R.S., c.33, s.103.
>
> 105(1)A book called the register of transfers shall be provided, and
> in the book shall be entered the particulars of every transfer of
> shares in the capital of the company.
>
> 105(2)One or more branch registers of transfers may be kept at places
> appointed by the directors.
>
> 105(3)Every transfer made at a branch registry shall be forthwith
> reported to the head office of the company.
>
> R.S., c.33, s.104.
>
> 106(1)Such books, with the exception of the minute books of the
> directors and executive committee, shall, during reasonable business
> hours of every day except Sundays and holidays, be kept open at the
> head office of the company or at such place as may be authorized under
> subsection (2) or (3) of this section, for the inspection of
> shareholders and creditors of the company and their personal
> representatives, and of any judgment creditor of a shareholder.
>
> 106(2)The Lieutenant-Governor in Council upon cause being shown to him
> may by order designate some other office of the company in the
> Province as the place where its books may be kept for the purposes of
> subsection (1).
>
> 106(3)Where an agent with an established place of business in the
> Province is appointed by the company for the purpose of recording the
> transfer of its shares, the book, in which are recorded the
> particulars mentioned in paragraphs 104(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f), may
> be kept at the agent’s place of business in the Province where the
> register of transfers is kept.
>
> 106(4)Every such shareholder, creditor or personal representative or
> judgment creditor may make extracts therefrom.
>
>
>
> The definition section of the Act states as follows:
>
> “shareholder” means every subscriber to, or holder of, stock in the
> company, and includes every member of a company without share capital
> and the personal representatives of the shareholder;
>
>
>
> As discussed with you, you do not seem to fall within the scope of
> section 106(1) to entitle you to see the records of ANB that are
> mentioned in section 104 of the Act.
>
>
>
> You have expressed the view you are entitled to see the above records
> and perhaps other records, notwithstanding that you do not fall
> presently within s 106(1). To what extent you have other legal rights
> to see the above records (or other records), you will need to pursue
> that viewpoint with ANB, not with myself.
>
>
>
> Charles McAllister
>
> Director- Companies Act
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Evelyn Greene
> To: ndesrosiers@ccla.org ; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ;
> lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca ; hubert.lacroix@cbc.ca ; andy.campbell@ctv.ca
> ; steve.murphy@ctv.ca ; w5@ctv.ca ; russomanno@wsgalaw.com ;
> kim.macpherson@gnb.ca ; heather.webb@gnb.ca ; david.alward@gnb.ca ;
> marie.claudeblais@gnb.ca ; madeleine.dube@gnb.ca ;
> charles.murray@gnb.ca
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:53 PM
> Subject: FW: Disclosure still outstanding
>
>
> I am sending this to you folks as a beginning of some information you
> need to know.  On May 13, 2011, the day I was beaten up by police at
> Ambulance New Brunswick on 24 Harold Doherty Dr., in Fredericton, I
> had originally agreed to meet with Charles LeBlanc for the first at
> the front of the Legislature.  I had spoken with my MLA Brian
> MacDonald on the 12th and I made him aware that I was doing the
> interview due to him and others not looking into the corruption.
>
> On May 13, 2011, I later learned that Premier David Alward and Health
> Minister Madeleine Dube had gone to Moncton or St. John and I believe
> it was to open an ambulance or to do with something about a new part
> of the hospital.  I sort of flagged this in mind because I thought
> this is convenient that they are both out of town when I got beaten.
>
> I had arranged a few days earlier to meet Charles LeBlanc however,
> that morning I wrote him an email and cancelled saying I was not well
> which was true as is in the police records when they charged me.
> However, the timeline to deliver the Right to Information was up that
> day and in the afternoon I forced myself to go downtown and serve
> them.  I first went to Cox and Palmer Law Firm, then to the Court
> House to see Craig Carleton and then to the N.B. Police Commission and
> secretary/receptionist Julie Williams accepted the documents.
>
> Then I went to Ambulance N.B. where they seemingly were expecting me.
> I felt then as I do today that they were call by someone and were
> expecting me.
>
> 1. On the day of that Friday, May 13, 2011, I had an email from
> Charles LeBlanc saying all of a sudden his blog was shut down.
> However, as I reported at the time, I smelled a rat and I told Mr.
> LeBlanc this and later after that day I asked to do an interview in
> front of the Justice Bld. and Charles LeBlanc refused, saying he was
> interviewing Mayor Woodside at City Hall.  Then there was this big ten
> minute or more interview on Charles' blog with the Mayor and the Mayor
> was saying things like, "When I pick you up in the winter and give you
> a drive ........ (this was to Charles).  I smelled a rat then as I do
> not and I sent Charles a letter and copied all government heads saying
> he would make the perfect stooge for the mayor and others.
>
> Look at the next few emails, please.
>
> It was Sally Brooks who wanted me to meet with her and Charles LeBlanc
> at the coffee shop last week and I told Sally I did not trust him.
> She said he has ADHD and is harmless and that when he was in court he
> could hardly talk.  I told her that this did not compute in my mind,
> because he can stand in front of the police station on another day and
> blurt the hell out of himself yelling things at the police and writing
> all this stuff on the blog.  Sally said just come and see.  That
> morning, Charles LeBlanc could hardly look me in the fact and I told
> Sally that and she said she noticed but she felt it was nothing.  In
> fact, I gave him $10 for coffee and he took our picture and put it on
> the blog.  Howevr, he wanted to only put things on the blog which was
> really Sally and My blog but he wanted to control what went in and
> out.  For ex. he did not want to print anything about the letter I
> wrote the Police Commission and I copied other people, including David
> Amos who to this date, I have not yet met.  However, David does speak
> the truth to my mind.  He may be blunt, but he says it like it is.  I
> told Sally I thought Charles and David were friends behind closed
> doors, but I have now changed that idea.  For ex. at no time did
> Charles LeBlanc ever tell me about Andre Murray's plight with the same
> police officer who beat me, Cst. Nancy Rideout nor did he mention any
> of the facts, but knew my story.  I just recently learned of Andre
> Murray and the common denomination we have in common:  "police abuse".
>
> Please read the next few emails and see what you think.  Then on
> Friday, Sally said she met with Charles at his house and she was late
> to meet me for lunch.  She did not mention that they were walking on
> the street as has been written on our blog.  However, Sally told me to
> just let Charles do the whole process of the blog and not send
> anything to him but brief comments as Charles is not well enough to
> understand my topics of police commission willfull blindness.  I said
> okay, but she did not say they were together on the streets nor
> mention anything like that, just that she was late because of doing
> errands.
>
> Please remember that nothing about my story was ever written in the
> Brunswick Newspaper owned by irving and this is the case with Mr.
> Andre Murray.  Why?  Why would Jacques Poitras refuse to write
> anything and basically threw me out of the CBC a couple weeks ago,
> saying I wrote his boss, Hubert Lacroix.  I asked Mr. Lacrois since
> that time if Mr. Poitras has any connection with the female crown
> prosecutor, Ms. Poitras in Bathurst, N.B.
>
> Then someone wrote recently that our finance minister, mr. Higgs used
> to work for Irvings.
>
> I have continually asked if Irving or his son, Kenneth, who up and
> left the Irvings shortly after my beating took place and went to
> Kinross Gold may have anything to do with Ambulance N.B. and the big
> contract its partner, Medavie EMS which is a private, for-profit co.
> that has common shares and because it is a private co., the
> shareholders do not need to be mentioned at corporate records due to
> N.B. legislative statute under Private Act and corporations.  For ex.,
> Medavie EMS partnered with NB EMS and that too is partnered with
> Ambulance N.B.  They won a lucrative bid for sending a fleet of
> ambulances from Canada to Trinidad for $90 million a year.  Was it in
> our newspaper.  I did not see it.  Also, I have shared with many of
> you the corporate documents showing irregularities in the letters
> patent and the incorporation of Medavie EMS which is signed by a
> lawyer in Halifax who is with the law firm, Stewart McKelvey who
> represents Ambulance N.B. Inc.  I wrote the Trinidad Government and I
> got hold of the paper from Trinidad, the TNT Mirror saying the
> Attorney General was concerned about irregularities in the contract
> and Medavie EMS had written asking what was the hold up.  I then
> forwarded my story about getting beaten up at Ambulance NB Inc. and
> there was no investigation albeit I informed the Premier, David Alward
> and all other ministers.  It is my understanding too that in order for
> a P3 partnership that EMS set up with Ambulance NB it is supposed to
> be okayed with the Cabinet.  In fact the Minister has to sign off on
> it.  However, it was signed by a different Minister, Jack Keir, on
> behalf of Minister Greg Byrne who Mr. Keir said was out of the country
> at the time.  I asked the secretaries at Service NB who Jack Keir is
> and they did not know, but I later found out and called Mr. Keir.  He
> told me he is no longer the minister and did not know what he was
> signing, saying he is a North shore, St. John New Brunswicker and not
> a lawyer.  I have the documentation and it is questionable.  I sent
> this information to Finance Minister Blaine Higgs and he did not
> respond.  I went to see Kim MacPherson, our auditor general and she
> said she had no obligation to report it.  She said she knew nothing
> about this P3 deal and she would not talk further, telling her
> secretary, Heather, to tell me she could not help me in my plight for
> justice and almost being beaten to death while wearing an implanted
> heart defibrillator and reported sick to the paramedic station.  This
> is documented by others, not just me.
>
> Then I checked the records for Ambulance N.B. Inc. and find that the
> lawyer for the Minister of Health, Charles Murray is on the Board of
> Directors, as is Donald J. Peters the CEO of Horizon Health Network
> also known as Regional Health Authority B and is over the Dr. Everett
> Chalmers Hospital where my problems first stemmed.  It is scary
> really.
>
> Pls. read on.
>
> Evelyn Greene
>
> Wait for the next few emails and then let me know what you think of
> all of this please, especially the Canadian Civil Liberties Assoc. who
> know I contacted them long ago about my plight and they said they
> could not help.
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:08:19 -0800
> From: sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca
> Subject: Re: Disclosure still outstanding
> To: evelyngreene@live.ca
>
>
>
>
> brilliant!
>
> This is really good, really concise and absolutely puts the pressure
> on. Well done Evelyn.
>
> STOP PRESS: LAXATIVE SALES BOTTOM OUT IN NEW BRUNSWICK!
> From: Evelyn Greene <evelyngreene@live.ca>
> To: christopher.lavigne@gnb.ca
> Cc: luc.labonte@gnb.ca; pierre.castonguay@gnb.ca;
> madeleine.dube@gnb.ca; justice.comments@gnb.ca;
> sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca; wishart.john@dailygleaner.com;
> wylie1@nb.sympatico.ca; mboudreau@stu.ca; w5@ctv.ca;
> hubert.lacroix@cbc.ca; jacques.poitras@cbc.ca; info@atlanticalarm.com;
> keith.ball@gnb.ca; kimthomas@ag.gov.tt
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 12:30:37 PM
> Subject: Disclosure still outstanding
>
>
>
> Mr. Lavigne:
>
> I still have not received confirmation that you went back to the
> police and Ambulance N.B. to obtain the rest of the answers to the
> questions you posed to them in your letter of Dec. 2011 about the CCTV
> evidence and the Audio evidence.
>
> (1)  Surely you are not going to accept the perjured evidence of Robin
> O'Hara and go ahead now and subpoena the main information straight
> from Atlantic alarm and sound right off the original data base or
> where it is initially (originally) recorded?  You need this according
> to the head of the company.
>
> (2)  Where is the evidence of the 911 call from Ambulance N.B. to the
> police.
>
> (3)  Did you get the statement from the Ambulance N.B. and the Police
> why the police were called in the first place when I was sitting
> quietly, and felt sick, and was no harm to myself or anyone else.  Why
> was that called placed to the police and why did four police officers
> and four cars arrive when it was not even an emergency?  Do you not
> see that my Charter rights were violated to a high (not low or
> moderate degree) ending up with me having bodily injury and no police
> report made out that I have seen, and as per the rules of the Police
> Act, when personal injury happenes to a person in custody?
>
> (4)  Why did the police investigate themselves when I made a complaint
> of abuse against them to the Chief of Police?  Who investigated this
> and where are their reports?
>
> (5)  Where is the report of NCO Horseman when he took my complaints
> and my statement?  What did he say?
>
> (6)  I need the answers requested from David Banks, the dispatch head
> at the police station for all 911 calls.
>
> (7)  Did you ask the police to explain the different dispatchers on
> the call and the questions posed to the crown about the video
> tampering evidence supplied by Ms. Brooks?
>
> (8)  Judge Richards had said to prosecutor Rose Campbell that Greene
> needs a lawyer and she was looking into, but then a new Judge (Judge
> Jackson) came on the case and I told him about this but he did not
> look into it.
>
> (9)  Where are the answers to the other questions you posed such as
> why Constable Rideout was on the phone while in the police car taking
> me to Headquarters and reporting that I was loud and out of control
> but this was not picked up on the audio of the call.
>
> (10)Why were the ambulance dispatched to 24 Doherty Drive for almost 8
> minutes after I was taken to headquarters?  I need their reports as to
> why and what they were doing there?  I have asked Fire Chief Toole who
> did not respond.  You need to get this information even if it is by
> subpoena.
>
> (11)  Where are the phone records of all calls made to Ambulance N.B.
> at 24 Harold Doherty Dr. on the 13th of May?  Were any from Cox and
> Palmer or from the NB Police Commission or the Court House.
>
> (12)  I sent you recent conflicting statements from representatives
> from Atlantic Alarm and Sound.  The owner had obviously not
> anticipated that I would contact the service provider who obviously
> told the truth.  What are you doing about that, if anything?  And if
> nothing, why not, please explain?
> (
> (13)  You have the capacity to send the CCTV video to the crime lab in
> Halifax (RCMP) so why has this not yet been done which would add their
> input to this matter?  Are you not wanting to know the truth here Mr.
> Lavigne because it would most likely cost less than $500 and your are
> spending far more than that on continuing on with this bogus charge at
> great expense to the public purse and the court's time?
>
> (14).  Much other evidence is sent to the crime lab for analyses so
> why is this case different?  Please explain that.
>
> (15).  The McNeil case was decided by the Supreme Court of Canada and
> that includes all disclosure must be given to the Defendant,
> regardless of privacy issues or anything else.  Again what are you
> doing to get the original documentation of the CCTV video.  The
> service co-ordinator said if one camera is not working, then the
> others take over.  There are four cameras surrounding the paramedic
> door at Ambulance N.B. Paramedic Bay and clearly picked up other
> movement that day, but did have four minute splitting here and there.
> The pictures that do take are for the most part visible so it is not a
> case of the camera set low for visibility issues?
>
> (16)  The expert from Outreach Productions wrote down that a police
> officer magically appears from no where on the CCTV camera?  What did
> you learn about that?
>
> I need answers to these questions and I am asking once more to review
> my file in its entirety and have the times set so that the photocopies
> can be made at that time.  I asked Simonne of the Prosecutor's office
> for copies and she said I would have to come back.  When I came back,
> she had left for home early and when I picked up the documents early
> the next week, many of the documents I requested to be photocopies
> were not included.  There was one email or report that had the word
> dizzy typed out like this "d-i-z-z-y".  I suspect that was one of the
> officers or paramedics who reported I told them I felt dizzy that day
> which i did.  Why would this be concealed now and
>
> (17)  Have you now reviewed all of the evidence, including the CCTV
> video and audio and my doctor's notes and the notes I submitted
> regarding the officer who was let off a charge in Ont. as he has
> hypoglycemia which I have and is in the police reports?
>
> (18)  You know that Cst. Rideout left my angina meds. (nitro) in my
> car with my purse and would not let me have it before going to
> headquarters and then $150 went missing out of my purse when it was
> returned so that I would not have the cash on hand to get my impounded
> car.  I also had to call a taxi for a drive back across the river to
> where my car was impounded and for some reason their debit machines
> were not working.
>
> (19)  I have a lifeline contract with Phillips Lifeline and I have
> told them of this issue.  My lifeline box which is connected to the
> hospital has not worked for some time and lifeline calls me every
> night at 7 p.m. to ensure I am okay.  If they do not hear form me,
> they call the ambulance.  Not long ago, I did not hear the phone ring
> and they sent the ambulance and fire truck.  I went to the door and
> said I did not hear the phone ring and I was listenening for it and
> told them I was okay.  Phillips lifeline then called the paramedics
> and was told by the paramedics "that she (Greene) was not home.  I
> asked Lifeline to document this information as it is just one part of
> the total picture of lies and corruption from Ambulance employeess.
> Your job, I believe, is to ask whey they lied to lifeline?  It is
> documented so you could contact them directly.
>
> I look forward to receiving your response to this letter which I will
> drop off at the Crown's office next week in hard copy so that if you
> fail to address these questions, I will use them later for appeal
> purposes as is the case with all the documentation I asked for to date
> and did not receive.  Also perphas you can ask why I have not been
> allowed a lawyer as per Judge Richards question about that to
> Prosecutor Rose Campbell?
>
> Evelyn Greene
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; <T.J.Burke@gnb.ca>; <john.foran@gnb.ca>;
> <Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca>; <frederic.loiseau@fredericton.ca>;
> <tony.whalen@gnb.ca>
> Cc: <abel.leblanc@gnb.ca>; <jack.keir@gnb.ca>; <premier@gnb.ca>;
> <Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:08 AM
> Subject: Hells Angels EH Chucky Leblanc? When was the last time you or
> the Irvings or the RCMP saw one ride a Panhead alone?
>
>
> Remember these old emails of yours Chucky Baby? Post this photo of my
> nasty arse I Double Dog Dare Ya to Frenchy. At least my baby boy's
> little arse is far more innocent looking  than Shawny Baby Graham's
> black eye EH Frenchy?
>
> Small wonder that I didn't allow him anywhere near and of Cardinal
> Law's nasty Boyz in Beantown EH?
>
> You must I figured out by now that I hate diddlers and especiallly the
> ones who pretend to be oh so pious and above us all. By now you must
> at least understand one of the reasons I supported Byron Prior years
> ago in his quest for justice but I was always more concerned about
> about what he knows about Johnny Crosbie, the Haliburton dudes and our
> dead fish. But you don't know the first thing about that do ya? It
> must be because not one of your five brians knows how to read Nest Pas?
>
> HELL ANGELS FROM MONTREAL LOOKING FOR CHARLES LEBLANC????
> by Charles LeBlanc Saturday, Jun. 12, 2004 at 11:26 AM
>
> Thursday morning, I showed up at the Legislature to use the computer
> at the Library.
> I was told by security that two rough looking individuals walked
> through the doors and asked for a Charles Leblanc?
> They described the guys as rough looking and one of them had a long
> gray beard with a leather jacket!
> At first, I believe it was the Hell Angels coming down from Montreal
> for a hit on Charles.
>
> Hours later, I seen my bigot buddy Matthew Glenn and he was in front
> of the Legislature with his blowhorn.
> For you people who don't know the bigot? He's the one who started the
> Anglo Society. I seen him preaching to three young kids and of course
> I butt in and said - Hey Bigot??? Why don't you bigot go home?
>
> Minutes later, we were approached by two guys and they asked politely
> –Where can we locate a Charles LeBlanc???
> In a matter of seconds, the bigot quickly pointed at me. I said to
> myself - Ohhh?? Thanks a lot Bigot!!!
>
> At the end? It was a guy named David Amos and I guess that he's
> running at an independent in the riding of Fundy Royal. The guy have
> been living in the area of Boston and he's been following my updates
> on the internet. I'm telling you that the information highway is a
> great way to spread the message to the rest of the world!
>
> We talked for around 30 minutes and it was nice to see the bigot, me
> and David Amos together debating our own little concern issue. We all
> have our own issues and it's too bad that we cannot unite and fight
> but that's the way Canadians do things. They remind silent until the
> Government really pissed them all and go out and vote the party in
> power out of office.
>
> What did I tell you people in the past? Someone is
> going to crack up one of these days and I know for a
> fact the area targeted is going to be the Legislature.
>
> Two weeks later you wrote this Chucky
>
> "There's always undercovers cops around but only when the House is in
> session. As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but it's just a
> matter of time till someone is push over the edge.
>
> I guess a guy name David Amos was shown the door yesterday at the
> Legislature. This guy is running as an Independent candidate in the
> riding of Fundy Royal. I met the guy over the net and he has a beef
> with our political bureaucrats. I admire people fighting for what they
> believe in but you can't get carried away.
>
> I guess in this case? He wanted to speak from the Gallery and that's a
> big faux pas!"
>
> After you continued to make fun of me throughout the summer of 2004
> amongst the other things I forwarded to you was an old joke about my
> drunken Irish Catholic in laws in Beantown. N'est Pas? It must have
> pissed you off as I tortured the Hell out of your buddy Bernie Richard
> the nasty Ombudsman too before my wife and I and a lawyer visited the
> Police Commission. In response you sent photos of your old soon to be
> dead dog comparing it to me. I laughed the photos were taken by your
> Fake Left friends and emailed to you. Your big Faux Pas was that you
> were so dumb you sent me their email address too. Thus in a wink of an
> eye I knew and had the proof of who was behind you and pulling your
> strings. Do they remember my conversations with them last year? I do.
> The question is did I record them as they made liars out of themselves.
> LOL EH? Stay tuned Frenchy.
>
> When you saw that I was falsely imprisoned in Boston on October 1st,
> 2004 you largely shut up and never responded to my emails over the
> course of the past four years because you knew what I did with them
> after that. As the old Joke goes many a true word is said in jest and
> you did not like other people reading your nonsense to me. Correct?
>
> Years after that old joke I sent you went around. The Yankees made a
> movie starring Jack Nicholson based on Whitey's life and times. It is
> entitled "The Departed". Perhaps the drunken Catholic in you should
> rent it sometime with your welfare dimes. Listen closely to what ol
> Jacky Boy says about your Church and their very corrupt doings.
>
> My Keith ancestors and I were not alone in our contempt towards your
> church EH? Did your Mama tell you that the Keiths came out of northern
> Germany to settle in Scotland in order to escape your nasty Popes and
> their cohorts? Do you understand that after the shit was settled in
> 1755 the Frenchmen in Canada who did not wish to be shipped out to
> other French holdings swore allegiance to the British Crown? What
> makes you dudes think that you can change the deal now especially in
> light of the fact every Indian demands that we hold up to all the
> other deals our ancestors made long before any of us were born? The
> Scottish part of you should shove that Acadian flag along with its
> flagpole up your French arse Chucky Baby. Is that clear or COR enough
> for you?
>
> To rub it in I will tell you that after my father died my Mama married
> Loyd Nickerson a member of the COR Party who was also the Chief
> Electoral Officer of New Brunswick. One big reason I ran in Fundy is
> that there are damn few French men registered to vote and not many
> Catholic churches in Kings County. I  ain't a bigot. I love French
> Catholic women. Hell I was the first of my family that I know of who
> married a Catholic woman.  It is their greedy Catholic brothers that I
> hate be they either French or Irish or whatever. I believe they call
> this shit conflict of colours Orange versus Green  not biker bullshit
> as you claimed about me. I don't wear Biker colours I where the
> colours of My Clan and I have many friends.  Quite possibly many more
> true French ones than you do. How can you have true friends at all if
> they can't trust you. Do your even believe yourself and your obvious
> Bullshit?
>
> How do you sleep at night knowing yourself as you do? Why do you
> make fun of a fellow Maritimer whose family was destroyed by the
> very people you pretend to complain about? Never forget I am from
> Dorchester Frenchy and Ivan Cormier (AKA the Beast) was on my paper
> route and I liked and admired him and his friends and their art
> particularly Killer Karl Krupp and the Cuban. Their Bullshit was flat
> out entertaining and not malicious at all. Yours definitely is
> malicious and not funny at all. No Class Bobby Bass had way more class
> in his worst fart than you do in your whole soul. I must say venting
> some of my venom towards you is definitely good for my savage soul. As
> a southern friend of mine would say when I was feeling mean years ago
> "Ya gots to get the poison out or ya die just don't spit out in my
> direction. Save it for somebody who deserves it."
>
> BTW, the man who sold me that old Panhead that your cop buddies in Fat
> Fred City stole from me last summer was a of French Cathlolic heritage
> out of Quebec. He was a really good friend of mine and I named my bike
> after him and his wife. His family moved from Quebec to Vermont about
> a hundred years ago when your greedy priests demanded that the poor
> folks build another big fancy church across the road from the one they
> just built. So they crossed the border, built a simple church and went
> about the pursuit of happiness in a country that is supposed to keep
> church and state separate and have only one official language. Go try
> your crybaby French welfare nonsense in New Hampshire or Vermont
> sometime Chucky and see if you come back in one piece. I would pay
> money I don't have to watch that circus tent unfold. The Pope's
> mission is to keep you dudes poor and dumb. Get it Frenchy? If not ask
> your hero Spinksy Baby to argue me as if I care what any of you think.
> I would argue him right after that chickenshit IDs himself and proves
> to me and everyone else that he is not Brent Taylor.
>
> I Double Dog Dare Ya to post this email in his blog. I am posting it
> deep in your buddy the Gypsy's blog before I post it in mine. That is
> if he has still maintained his integrity after all my stress tests
> last week. You dudes kissing the "The General Blogger" nasty arse was
> too much for me to stand. It was too funny that T. J Burke blocked my
> defence of your blatant stupidity N'est Pas?
>
> BTW one of my wife's cousins Robert T. Kickham you remember the evil
> ex banker who turned into the evil priest is still Cardinal O'Malley's
> secretary in Beantown as far as I know. Why don't you sing their
> priases on the Internet this Easter and ask that all the corrupt
> Catholics to pray that I be crucified by the RCMP soon? I must ask you
> Chucky why did you support diddlers for years and then suddenly turn
> coat and support Byron Prior's pursuit of justice after ignoring the
> fact that I introduced you two to each other four years ago?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> P.S.  For the record Chucky this joke is still funny to me and my arse
> and my balls are as big as ever. Ain't it funny how time slips away
> and yet some things remain the same? Everybody knows I find you
> contemptible and why that is so. I do wish you a long life so that you
> can recall all your sins countless times with your five brains.
> However I must turn the page my personal history and go back to how I
> once was before I am dust once more. Life is too short to argue with
> liars for long or dance with ugly women so to speak. My Baby Boy turns
> 18 this year thus my job of raising him is largely done. He and his
> sisters are my best piece work. They all have the records of all my
> work including this email. (Obviously I sent it from one of my other
> email accounts to one of my son's for safe keeping before I save it
> digitally and print it as well.) Before long my son will be the Chief
> of our Clan and it will be his job to defend my integrity and my deeds
> for the benefit of my seed as I grin proudly from the grave. He is
> quite simply the best man I ever met and truly a man of his word.
> Never underestimate my darling daughters they are tigers in their own
> right and I raised them not to take shit from anyone. They may prove
> to be the most trouble for the unethical smiling bastards that are the
> powers that be right now.
>
> Between men I asked my son to piss on the graves of my enemies someday
> if I could not do so and he promised that he would. I would not ask my
> little Darlins to do such a thing out of respect to their gender. As
> part of my Blood Feud you made the list Chucky Baby. Your Mama will
> understand why I told my son that in order to pay proper respect to
> from Whence We Came he really should drink a lot of Keiths beer before
> he does so. Whereas neither of us like the taste of beer I will leave
> him to his own chosen poison as long as he enjoys the in and out of it all.
>
> As for me I plan to Rest in Peace in Dorchester someday happy in
> knowing the fact that  I have left at least four very decent folk
> behind me on this planet. My skull like Yorick's of old will grin like
> Hell thinking about the fact that the prevailing winds will blow the
> smell of my rotting corpse towards your old stomping grounds where you
> no doubt will be buried without any children at all to visit your
> bones. If you do have kids or an ex wife or two I never read where you
> admitted it. Dudes like you and your fans such as Dean Roger Ray and
> the Depupty Dog Robert F. O'Meara are too selfish to make decent
> loving fathers anyway. If there truly is a Hell like in your dreams
> Chucky, I will look for you there. I suspect the Devil would promote
> me to Sergeant at Arms and give me a Black Rod as soon as I landed in
> order to cram it up your nasty French arse. I have no doubt its hard
> to get good help in Hell and Satan will need a lot of help pounding on
> all the evil priests, bankers, lawyers, cops, politicians and the
> liars like you who supported their malice in this wonderful old world.
> N'est Pas?
>
> Can one of your five brains tell that you have an ethical pigheaded
> Maritimer you hates you with a very justifiable passion Chucky Baby?
> Whereas your buddy Shawny Baby Graham enjoys jokes maybe he will enjoy
> this one since it is on you. It is not my joke and I give credit where
> credit is due. I hate it when you or your buddies Dean Roger Ray or
> the Yankee Stevey Boy Erickson steal my words and claim them as their
> own while you try to impeach my character at the same time. If anyone
> doubts that I am the first Chief of the Amos Clan who has every right
> and duty to defend it fiercely perhaps he should query the dockets of
> the US District Court in Concord New Hampshire if he knows how.
> Whereas everything in the Catholic's heaven and hell is down in three
> I file My Clan's declaration of Independence for the Keiths within
> three affidavits in three different matters. I do not file nuisance
> lawsuits as Yankee blogger hero claims. Danny Boy can post the photo
> of my nasty arse, my boy and my panhead on the Internet with my
> knowledge and assent and my blessings and thanx as well. However I
> still own the rights to it. I need it for my book about you Fake Left
> Creeps on Fat Fred city and elsewhere. It may be the only thing that I
> leave my kids that could be worth something someday. Maritimers do
> love juicy gossip N'est Pas?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Date:    Fri, 18 Oct 2002 02:02:22 -0400
> From:    Rollo Tomasi rollotomasi@COMCAST.NET
> Subject: Bingo-Playing Golden-Age Golden Glove Catholic Gang Members
> Lay Waste to Bay State
>
> Boston - First it was financial scandals, followed by Notre Dame
> football teams that really sucked, then pederast priests. Now it appears
> that bingo, the fourth and some would say most important pillar of the
> Roman Catholic Church, is on the verge of self-destruction.
>
> Yesterday members of the Boston Police Department SWAT team, two
> divisions of the Massachusetts National Guard and the US Army's elite
> Delta Force had to be called in to stop a riot that had broken out at the
> Whitey Bulger Memorial Senior Citizen Center at St. Bernadette's
> Cathedral in the so-called "Southie" section of Beantown.
>
> "Southie," populated mostly by unemployed drunk Irish immigrants,
> became well-known in the 1970s as a symbol of protest against racial
> integration, and according to statistics released by the US Census Bureau,
> contains the highest concentration of dim-witted white people in the world.
>
> Although details at this point are sketchy, it appears that the cause of
> the
> riot was dissatisfaction over new rules limiting bingo participants to one
> colostomy bag per person.
>
> "I know these old-timers can play bingo all night," said Seamus O'Connor,
> director of activities at the Bulger Center, "But, my god, seven colostomy
> bags?!  C'mon, we all know they were smuggling in contraband and
> controlled substances.  Heck, we even found one hastily discarded bag
> filled with two gallons of Curacao.  I mean, give me a break.  Who pisses
> blue anyway?"
>
> The Diocese of Boston officially denied any responsibility for the riot.
> John Cardinal O'Donnell, Archbishop of the Diocese, angrily attacked the
> press for what he termed "sloppy reporting by biased reporters who have
> been duped by Protestant agitprop."
>
> Cardinal O'Donnell assumed a defiant posture as he met with members of
> the press.  "I'm sick and tired of all the anti-Irish prejudice in
> American society.
> You read the newspapers and you'd think that all we Irish do is drink,
> fight
> and whore around." O'Donnell then chugged a bottle of Guinness Stout,
> pinched his secretary on her posterior, made two fists with his hands and
> said,
> "And I'll lick any man who says otherwise."
> __
> by William Grim
> (c) Copyright 2002 Broken Newz
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: charlie leblanc
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Good Day Charlie say het to Andy for me
>
>
> merci
>
> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ;
> oldmaison1@yahoo.ca ; wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ;
> Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Efford.J@parl.gc.ca ;
> Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; 'Stephen Harper' ; Jack Layton ;
> MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca
> ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Zed.P@parl.gc.ca ;
> info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca ; justice@gov.nl.ca ; Canadian Justice Review Board
> ; J. D. Kuntz ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; Brent Taylor ;
> gbudden@buddenmorris.com ; frontline@wgbh.org
> Cc: info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; strategis@ic.gc.ca ; JackMCOPA@aol.com ;
> user.cru@pol.state.ma.us ; plypd@four.net ; corp.website@sunlife.com ;
> martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ;
> Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca ; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ;
> jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; police@fredericton.ca
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:13 PM
> Subject: Good Day Charlie say het to Andy for me
>
>
>      Hey Andy do ya remember this email I sent before the last I came
> home? I bet Charlie Leblanc don't just as the other LeBlanc dude
> didn't want to talk fishing and you didn't want to talk about
> soliciting. Since I have left the last thing you want to talk about is
> Indians EH? What is you dudes do other than suck Martin's arse?
>
>        It seems the Frenchman who represents from Beauséjour, the area
> I was born in forgot the fact that both he and his wife are lawyers.
> Obviously I didn't. I also never forgot how Chréitian waltzed on down
> to Beauséjour years ago and his buddy Mulroney allowed him to have a
> seat without opposition except from a lady in CoR from Dorchester. You
> remember that place don't Charlie? I grew up just down the road from
> ya. What do you think will do the other LeBlanc Dude will do  when he
> receives the same material you did last year? I don't trust Frenchmen
> who are lawyers do you? Ask the other Frenchman you admire Bernard
> Richard who is a lawyer from Shediac/Cape Pele area why that is. What
> do ya think should I stress test the new kid on the block, Victor
> Boudreau. I know he ain't a lawyer but never the less he is still a
> god damned Frenchman. I think most Frenchmen are just like you Charles
> LeBlanc. Greedy Bullshiters. However I really love the French ladies.
> So does that make me all bad? Am I pissing anybody off yet? Good.
> Trust nobody is half as mad as I am right now but at least I am still
> having fun. I am just giggling up a storm at the thought of how many
> people are cursing my name :)
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: dwatch@web.net
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically correct.
>
> Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of a good
> reason why I should not run for
> Parliament and at least speak my mind about the sad state of our affairs.
>
> You know who I am. If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight
> ball.
>
> Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and political
> process, I am coming home
> to stress test the ethics of many a lawyer/politician in my nativeland
> during the course of the next
> federal election. My question to all of you will be why did you wait
> for me to say something? Am I
> the only one paying any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two
> and tore up a temple when
> he saw all the money changing hands in a place that should not be
> concerned about such things.
> But forget about the money for a minute.
>
> What did he have to say about anyone that harmed a child?
> Rest assured I will remind you. Although Iain't religious, I must say
> that Jesus had more of sand
> than most men and he made some very good points about what is right
> and what is wrong. Can any
> of you even hold a candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that
> will back him up all the way
> down the line.
>
> I don't mind dying it is what I didn't do while I was living that will
> haunt me in in my grave. What is the
> golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact that he with the gold makes
> the rules. Do you think voters
> agree with that fact? What say you?
>
> Canadian Corruption
> Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
>
> How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and convict
> itself?
> After years of asking the Canadian Legal System to do its job, it's
> long past time to inform
> the public myself about this lack of action or justice.
>
> If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> Minister 1968 to 1969 and
> Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS
> OF
> COMPLETE LEGAL SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates
> your younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what would you
> do?
> At 12 years old she was the youngest child ever,in Grand Bank,to have a
> baby.
>
> I am willing to take any tests and answer all questions regarding my
> entire life. All he has to
> do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop manipulating our
> legal system and face the
> truth which I have been telling the legal System,and anyone else who
> would listen, all of my life.
> I didn't just awake one morning and decide to accuse the most powerful
> and most corrupt legal
> animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no education, no
> family, no hometown, no
> self- esteem or self-respect and no past, present or future as a
> contributing person. By the time
> I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger children, all of us
> abused and molested while
> our hometown either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or
> looked the other way and said
>  we were all trouble. and so on.......till the end.
>
> If anyone wishes to have the complete police statement contact me at
> alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net or
> telephone 709-834-9822. If I cannot reply I have been arrested. Please
> contact pm@pm.gc.ca or
> paul@paulmartin.ca and tell him the Priors of Grand Bank NF require
> Justice immediately.
>
> Thank You for helping.END OF WEB SITE
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre"
> dpm@pm.gc.ca
> To: davidamos@comcast.net
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> Subject: Regarding your e-mail
>
>  If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed to the
> Deputy Prime Minister
> and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, please
> include your return mailing
> address along with your original e-mail message.
>
> All official responses will be sent by regular mail.
>
> If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister through
> the regular mail, please
> use the following mailing address:
>
> The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> and Emergency Preparedness
> 340 Laurier Avenue West
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P8
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
>
> I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what you wrote to
> me?
>
> Why else would I be so pissed off? I am who I say I am and that is as
> follows:
>
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave,
> Milton, MA. 02186
> Phone 617 240-6698
>
> Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime Minister
> and are you a lawyer?
>
>
>  Jan 3rd, 2004
>
>
>
> Mr. David R. Amos
>
>
>
>         153 Alvin Avenue
>
>
>
>              Milton, MA 02186
>
>
>
>                   U.S.A.
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
>
>
>
> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
> predecessor,
>
> the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety.
>
>
>
> I apologize for the delay in responding.
>
>
>
> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
> suggest that you
>
> contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
> criminal
>
> activity should be brought to their attention since the police are in the
> best
>
> position to evaluate the information and take action as deemed appropriate.
>
>
>
> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
>
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> A. Anne McLellan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos mailto:davidamos@comcast.net
> Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
>
> Thank you for the notice.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos mailto:davidamos@comcast.net
> Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
>
> No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told me
> you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.
>
> You are the first politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my
> respect. Ask around Saint John about me
> in certain circles I am fairly well known. You may even know my
> sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid Chedore.
> Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was a tax
> Supervisor for the Province years ago. And
> maybe even my mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton.
> He was somewhat of a political person
> whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was chief electoral officer for about
> twelve years and did run as a Conservative)
>
> If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her a call and simply
> say that you appreciate her good words about
> you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is always
> confusing me with another brother. Her name is
> Anna and her number is 506 000 0000. Do with it what you will. Trust
> me I would love to see another out spoken
> Maritimer step up to the plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The
> sooner that I can go back to being just Papa the
> happier my little Clan will be. I would truly appreciate if someone
> would let my mom know that they are at least aware
> of my concerns whether they agree with me or not.
>
>                                                 Best Regards
>                                                                 Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> around here....
>
> I decided to retire because I truly miss my family. It's hard being on
> the road back and forth by yourself.
>
> It gets very lonely.
>
>              God Bless,
>                               Elsie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
>
>
>        Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about
> being forced to be away from his family its me.
> Give my mom a call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with
> the smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins
> ain't genuine. Maritimers can still find some fun in a long hard day
> :) Come to think of it, maybe thats why the
> Upper Canadians think we are crazy.
>
>         By the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to
> speak on my wife's behalf down here while I run
> for Parliament uphome. But before I go I have been invited to go
> fishing with Martha Stewart's brother Frank in the
> Gulf of Mexico. My matters are about to bust wide open down here. That
> is why I have chosen this time to make
> an appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I will step on
> the stump uphome.
>
>                                                            Best Regards
>
>       Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: robmoore@atrueconservative.ca
> To: davidamos@comcast.net
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
>
>
> David,
>
> Thanks for the e-mails.  I will read them all and hear what you have to
> say.
>
> All the best.
>
> Rob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: davidorchard@sasktel.net
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
> Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
>
>
> Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other
> politicians as well.  But I didn't bother to call them because they
> are lawyers as well. Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to
> them. Plus the smart one's have a bad habit of trying to ignore me
> anyway. I t appears that standard operating procedure for them is to
> ignore. delay, deny and then try to settle. They are confused by
> someone that wants to argue law rather than go away with the gold.
> What should be interesting to both of us is whether or not they have a
> sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an honest
> western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking
> about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a
> man as Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like
> him on this planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the
> Martha Stewart matter and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too
> funny to relate in this email.
>                             Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: rosent@math.toronto.edu
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
> Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: jim.prentice@shaw.ca
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
> Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: leblad@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:03 PM
> Subject: You, the Harvard Crowd and I
>
>
> We are going to have lots to argue about very soon. But like any true
> Maritimer we should first discuss why the Fishing ain't worth a good
> God damn.
>
>
>
> March 18, 2004
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Prime Minister Paul Martin announced today the renewed mandate of the
> Task Force on Seasonal Work. The Task Force will evaluate the
> challenges born by seasonal industries while looking into the needs of
> workers and communities that depend on them and provide advice on
> areas for possible action in the future.
>
> “This government places great importance on hearing from those lives
> that are directly impacted by our policies, including our seasonal
> workers. Our Caucus has been extremely active in making the sector’s
> opinions known, and will continue to play an important role in further
> examining those views,” said Prime Minister Paul Martin.
>
> “We are facing particularly challenging times in one of our economy’s
> strongest sectors and I look forward to working in collaboration with
> Parliamentarians and all Canadians to find solutions.”
>
> The Task Force will examine;
>
> the specific needs of seasonal industries and workers in the area of
> skills development, life-long learning, and literacy;
>
>
> ways to promote greater economic diversity and stronger local
> economies, particularly in rural and remote communities across Canada;
>
>
> the support required to help seasonal work dependent communities to
> adapt to seize opportunities provided by the new knowledge-based
> global economy;
>
>
> ways of lowering barriers to regional and interprovincial labour mobility;
>
>
> how to align income support programs such as Employment Insurance and
> Provincial Social Assistance Programs to improve income support, while
> also promoting full, year-round participation in the labour force;
>
> ways of addressing the challenges and opportunities offered by
> temporary foreign workers;
>
> the potential role for government in encouraging new approaches to
> community development, i.e. the `social economy` ;
>
> an assessment of the opportunities and challenges specific to seasonal
> economies in promoting the safeguard of our natural environment;
>
> The Task Force will deliver its report to the Prime Minister by November
> 2004.
>
> Members of the Prime Minister`s Task Force on Seasonal Work include;
>
> Chair: Brent St. Denis, MP (Algoma-Manitoulin)
> Vice-Chair: The Honourable Pierrette Ringuette, Senator (New Brunswick)
> Members: The Honourable Libby Hubley, Senator (Prince Edward Island)
> The Honourable Lorna Milne, Senator (Ontario)
> Dominic Leblanc, MP (Beauséjour-Petitcodiac)
> Jeannot Castonguay, MP (Madawaska-Restigouche)
> Rick Laliberte, MP (Churchill River)
> Georges Farrah, MP (Bonaventure-Gaspé-Îles-de-la-Madeleine-Pabok)
> Nancy Karetak-Lindell, MP (Nunavut)
>
>       Dominic LeBlanc was elected to the House of Commons in November
> 2000. Since then he has served on the Special Committee on Non-Medical
> Use of Drugs, and the Standing Committees on Fisheries and Oceans,
> Transport and Government Operations, National Defence and Veterans
> Affairs, and Public Accounts. He has also served as Parliamentary
> Secretary to the Minister of National Defence and was Chair of the
> Atlantic Caucus
>
> .
>
>       Mr. LeBlanc received a B.A. in political science from the
> University of Toronto (Trinity College), his Bachelor of Laws from the
> University of New Brunswick, and then attended Harvard Law School,
> where he obtained his Masters of Law. Academic successes include the
> Dean's List at the University of New Brunswick's Faculty of Law, a
> scholarship from the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian Bar
> Association, and the Graduating Average Prize from Trinity College at
> the University of Toronto.
>
> Prior to his election to the House of Commons, Mr. LeBlanc was a
> barrister and solicitor with Clark Drummie in Shediac and Moncton.
> From 1993-1996, Mr. LeBlanc was a Special Advisor to the Prime
> Minister of Canada.
>
>
>
>      Mr. LeBlanc is married to Jolène Richard, a Moncton lawyer. They
> have one son, Selby.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: scotta@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:55 PM
>
>
> Hey,
>    Methinks you and I should have a long talk very soon about
> Maritimers and Solicitor Generals. Call Anne McLellan or Wayne Easter
> and mention my name if you haven't heard of it by now. Trust that no
> lawyer uphome will welcome my letters. They hate it when they are
> compelled to uphold the law and the Public Trust particularly at
> election time.
>            David R. Amos
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 2 image/tiff name=New Solicitor General.tif
>
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 3 image/tiff name=Insp+General+DHS.tiff
>
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 4 image/tiff name=Francis+Galvin+too+late.tiff
>
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 5 image/tiff name=AG+Elliott+Spitzer.tiff
>
> Charles LeBlanc
> 114 Brunswick Street
> Fredericton
> New Brunswick
>
>
> Charles LeBlanc
> 114 Brunswick Street
> Fredericton
> New Brunswick
>
> I have too many people on my list so I added
> another account! Some of you will received my updates
> from oldmaison1@yahoo.ca and others will be
> oldmaison@yahoo.com...It just takes me too long to
> send my update with only one account!
>
> Ok..yesterday, I phoned the editor of the Local
> paper and asked him where do I send the bill for my
> stomach Transplant? The Irvings?????
> This is what got me very upset-
>
> Daily Gleaner | Brent Taylor
> As published on page A8 on January 11, 2005
>
> Robichaud made an impact
> Brent Taylor
> REALITY CHECK
>
> This morning in Moncton Louis Robichaud was given his
> final farewell.
>
> He had not been well in recent weeks, but maybe not
> everybody knew that. Journalists knew, and had been
> preparing for some time. So, when the sad news finally
> came last Thursday, New Brunswick's media was ready to
> retell the story of the "father of modern New
> Brunswick."
>
> All of the papers had extensive coverage, as did the
> electronic media.
>
> In helping to prepare a little of that preliminary
> work myself, I spent quite a bit of time researching
> the career of Louis Robichaud. The more I found, the
> more fascinated I became. Being a resident of Quebec
> for the entire 10-year reign of Robichaud, I never saw
> in person the changes he brought to the province. AND
> IT GOES ON BLAH BLAH BLAH….
>
> For you people who’s not familiar with Brent
> Taylor?
>
> He’s a former MLA from the C.O.R. Party! I used
> to debate Acadian issues with these bigots for years
> in the letters to the editor!
>
> The C.O.R. Party was to the Acadian population
> like the KKK is to the Blacks! Brent Taylor ran for
> the Leadership of the C.O.R. Party in the early 90s
> while in Campbellton he made a very very very
> Anti-French speech!
>
> We all know that a leopard never changes it spots
> and it makes me sick to my stomach seeing this
> headline in the Daily Gleaner and of course I never
> read this BS anyway but there’s something that I
> found very interesting yesterday.
>
> Someone told me that Brent Taylor will run under
> the P.C. Banner during the next Provincial Election!
> Well? I’ll tell you one thing right now!!! If Bernard Lord
> allows that Bigot to run??? Well? I’m going to be front
> and center with this issue!
>
> The P.C Party shouldn’t associate themselves with
> a man like Brent Taylor. Mind you, I met and have some
> good friends from the C.O.R. Party!
>
> As a matter of fact, I had a good chat with Max
> White during the P.C. Annual meeting in Fredericton a
> few months ago!
>
> But I’ll never forget Brent Taylor speech and I’m
> very surprised that he has his own column in the
> Irving Papers???  Why is that now???
>
> The Telegraph Journal stop printing my letters
> but they allowed a bigot to spread his views? Why is
> that now? Who knows?
>
> I crashed their first annual convention in 1991
> when Danny Cameron held a news conference telling the
> Government of the day < Frank McKenna > to removed the
> Acadian flag from on top of the Legislature.
>
> My actions went across Canada. There were 1,000
> members at that convention and I am not afraid to
> speak out against hatred!!!
>
> I was very surprised to see J.K. Irving at Louis
> Robichaud Funeral yesterday!
>
> Of course, I always like J.K. anyway but it’s his
> son J.D that I don’t care for!
>
> Hey? Any Billionaire who supports Racism? There’s
> definitely something wrong with this Picture.
>
> I told J.D. himself that he had a very racist
> Supervisor working at Gulf Operators
>
>
> The Rise and Fall of the New Brunswick CoR Party, 1988-1995
> Geoffrey Martin
>
>
> At the time this article was written Geoffrey Martin was teaching at
> Mount Allison University in Sackville, New Brunswick
>
> This article traces the rise and fall of one of Canada's
> recently-formed populist, "New right" parties, the Confederation of
> Regions Party of New Brunswick. It shows how and why the party was
> formed and why it collapsed in the last provincial election. COR-NB
> was a programmatic party based on political protest, which advocated a
> libertarian ideology. The article argues that partisan realignment is
> possible in "traditional" areas like New Brunswick, but that the anger
> that led to the formation of the party eventually turned inward and
> destroyed the party's coherence.
>
> On September 11, 1995, the saga of the Confederation of Regions Party
> of New Brunswick (COR-NB) ended, when the party received 7% of the
> votes and no seats in the provincial election. This represented a
> major collapse of a party, which in the 1991 provincial election
> polled 87,256 votes (21% of the total), took 8 seats, and the position
> of Official Opposition in the Legislative Assembly. As it turned out,
> COR-NB's success in 1991 took place in a "populist moment" in New
> Brunswick politics, in which a number of factors came together to
> enable a new party, which rejected "Official Bilingualism" and many of
> the basic principles of the political system, to achieve significant
> success in a province with almost no tradition of third-party
> activity. COR's collapse in the recent election shows that this
> populist moment has passed, along with the other factors that made for
> COR-NB's success. For the forseeable future New Brunswick politics has
> returned to its historic pattern of two-party competition among
> small-c conservative elites.
>
> The COR Party of New Brunswick
>
> COR-NB was formed in 1989, less than two years after the "McKenna
> sweep" of 1987, in which the Liberal Party under Frank McKenna won
> every single seat in the legislature. In the 1991 election, COR-NB won
> its seats in the South and Central parts of the province, and its
> support was also disproportionately in rural, sparsely populated
> areas. COR took advantage of the voters' underlying concern about
> bilingualism. It did this chiefly in the former heartland of the
> Progressive Conservative (PC) Party.
>
> There are five central points that describe the party's platform and
> principles.
>
> The party was, first of all, a programmatic party, not a brokerage
> party. It had a fixed programme which its activists were unwilling to
> compromise.
>
> Second, it was a protest party with roots in a single issue, that of
> "Official Bilingualism." The party was essentially an "ethnic party"
> representing a segment of English New Brunswick which was extremely
> dissatisfied, to the point of anger, over the direction of public
> policy in the province and the country.1
>
> Third, like Social Credit in Alberta, COR-NB was a populist party and
> it placed high priority on changing the system in addition to changing
> specific public policies. This populism was represented most
> significantly in the inversion of the political hierarcy: For COR
> activists, elected members were responsible to the Electorate first,
> then the Party, and only finally the Leader.
>
> Fourth, ideologically the party is "classical liberal" in the
> nineteenth century sense, which today is best referred to as
> libertarian.
>
> Fifth and finally, like Social Credit in the past, in class terms the
> COR Party is petty bourgeois and lower-middle class in its
> orientation.
>
> This final point is important and too often neglected, and is also
> relevant to other Canadian political experiments, especially the
> Reform Party of Canada. In its heyday the COR Party was dominated by
> middle-income and small-business people, professionals, and the
> self-employed. The middle class is the backbone of advanced industrial
> societies and pays more than its share of taxes and is most likely to
> feel put upon and unable to "get ahead." The party went beyond
> appealing only to "middle-income groups." It was also a reflection of
> those individuals who have an intermediate amount of control over
> their work, including professionals, small business people, and
> independent commodity producers, like farmers, woodlot owners, fishers
> and the self-employed in general. These characteristics are important
> because this class sometimes allies with the working class, sometimes
> with the middle class, and sometimes is alienated from both.
>
> Political parties based purely on the middle class and petty
> bourgeoisie are notoriously hard to hold together. As C. B. MacPherson
> notes, "the petite-bourgeoisie cannot be cohesive" in politics because
> the individualism of members of this class divides it and splinters it
> apart.2
>
> In electoral terms the COR Party was not a party of big business or
> the affluent, even if its programme, especially the provisions that
> weaken government, would seem to provide disproportionate benefits to
> large corporate interests. Yet high income groups and wealth holders
> appear to have stuck with the Liberals and PCs. This is symbolized by
> the close association of the powerful McCain family with the Liberal
> Party, and the fact that one of the McCain spouses, Margaret Norrie
> McCain, was appointed to a five-year term as the province's
> Lieutenant-Governor in 1994. The Irving interests, both individual and
> corporate, are harder to identify with certainty. The descendants of
> the founder of the Irving empire take little public role in partisan
> politics, seeming to prefer to influence the provincial government of
> the day regardless of its political stripe. Judging from the 1993
> federal election and the 1995 provincial election, the Irving
> preference runs towards the "old line" parties and not populist
> alternatives further to the right or the left. In the 1993 federal
> campaign, the Irving interests made financial contributions to both
> the PC and Liberal campaign funds, and not to Reform, the National
> Party or the NDP.3
>
> The Formation of the COR Party
>
> The McKenna Liberals completely dominated New Brunswick politics from
> 1987 to 1989, and New Brunswick was effectively a one-party province
> during that time. Yet the COR Party rose much faster, less than two
> years after the 1987 election, than is usually the case with third
> parties. First of all, this rapid rise is explained by the seriousness
> and longevity of New Brunswick's high unemployment and economic
> hardship over the last 25 years. The Progressive Conservative Party
> was wiped out in 1987 as a repudiation of Richard Hatfield, whose
> longevity in power and personal legal troubles turned the electorate
> against him. Further, the Progressive Conservative Party was slow to
> rebuild, and the leader it finally elected, Barbara Baird Filliter,
> was generally regarded as ineffective. The rapidity of the rise of
> COR-NB was also a response to the McKenna government's desire to
> increase bilingualism in the civil service, an effort which the
> government has since admitted it has not succeeded in achieving.
> Finally, for many activists and voters, federal and provincial
> politics are not separate, and one reason for the rise of the COR-NB
> was the activists' distaste for the Mulroney government, another
> handicap for the provincial PC Party.
>
> A neglected aspect of the rise of COR-NB was its genesis as a social
> movement called the New Brunswick Association of English-Speaking
> Canadians, usually shortened to the English Speaking Association
> (ESA). The ESA was formed in the early 1980s to oppose the extension
> of bilingualism in the provincial government, something that it was
> effective in preventing. The ESA was like a party-in-waiting with a
> membership and an agenda, so that activists were easy to mobilize once
> the decision to form a new party was taken in the late 1980s. By that
> time individuals involved in the organization began to question their
> effectiveness as a lobby group. "We brought our concerns to government
> but it just became frustrating because month after month we were
> bringing the same concerns, getting the same answers, and really not
> getting anywhere," said Arch Pafford, COR-NB's first president, first
> leader, and an ESA activist.4
>
> The ESA was a single-issue social movement and the COR Party inherited
> ESA activists and this issue. Perhaps because of its ties to the
> (now-defunct) federal COR Party, COR-NB quickly developed similar New
> Right policies, including opposition to the Meech Lake Accord and
> support for parliamentary reform, tax reform, privatization, and
> deregulation. While party activists claim the COR Party is not a
> one-issue party, the party, like the ESA before it, would never had
> been formed without Anglophone discontent over the perceived lack of
> jobs for Anglophones, and Official Bilingualism, two phenomena that
> COR-NB activists always linked together. As Sue Calhoun has written,
> "If someone is pushed about why they joined COR, the answer is,
> inevitably, because of language."5 Just as the ESA was a protest
> vehicle, the COR Party was a protest party because of its desire to
> overturn the status quo and because of its dependence on a single
> issue, that of language policy.
>
> The COR Party in Decline
>
> By the fall of 1993, two years after the party's breakthrough in the
> 1991 election, the COR Party was clearly in decline, manifested in the
> party's slide in public opinion polls as well as internal bickering.
> By 1994 the party consistently polled between 3-7% of decided voters
> in various polls (down from 21% in the 1991 election) and its
> membership had plunged from around 20,000 in 1991 to approximately
> 2500 by the end of 1994. To some extent the conditions for the decline
> of the party mirror the conditions under which it arose.
>
> In this section some of the reasons for the party's decline will be
> outlined, but we will concentrate on one of the root reasons for the
> party's problems, that of the incompatibility between the party's: a)
> populism; b) free market ideology, and; c) its role as a political
> party and Official Opposition in the existing system. In contrast to
> many members of the party, the argument presented here is that COR's
> problem was not just a matter of finding a new or better leader.
>
> The party ultimately collapsed because of the membership's approach to
> politics and because a section of the party was unwilling to conform
> to the existing party system.
>
> There are straight-forward reasons for the party's decline that should
> be delineated briefly. First, the departure of Brian Mulroney from
> national politics, and the collapse of the federal PCs in the 1993
> federal election, made it possible for small-c conservatives to return
> to the provincial PC Party. Second, the COR Party suffered a double
> blow from the Charlottetown Constitutional Accord referendum in 1992.
> Since the accord was defeated nationally, constitutional and language
> issues disappeared for a time from the political agenda, which hurt
> the COR Party's ability to grab public attention. Even the province's
> constitutionalization of Bill 88, which declared the equality of the
> Francophone and Anglophone communities in the province, and the 1994
> Québec election, did not excite widespread public attention. The
> second blow was that COR-NB led the anti-accord side in New Brunswick
> in 1992 and yet the pro-accord side won convincingly in the province,
> all of which undermined COR-NB's claim that it represented some kind
> of "silent majority."
>
> Third, the provincial PC Party gained new credibility in the last two
> years because of the effectiveness of its leader, Dennis Cochrane, who
> was elected to that position and to the Legislative Assembly in 1991.
> Even the sudden resignation of Mr. Cochrane in the spring of 1995, and
> his replacement by former Mulroney cabinet minister Bernard Valcourt,
> did not revive COR's fortune's. Fourth, Frank McKenna's Liberal
> government was rightward leaning during its second mandate (1991-95),
> given its attitudes toward individual and provincial self-reliance,
> cuts to social and health services, and its emphasis on job creation
> in the private sector. This also hurt the COR Party because like a
> competent brokerage politician, McKenna's rightward move undercut
> COR-NB support, and this left most opponents of the government in the
> centre (supporting the PCs) or to the left (supporting the NDP, led by
> Elizabeth Weir).
>
> All of these are important reasons for the decline of the party, but
> we should concentrate on another reason, the incompatibility of the
> party's self-identity and its role in the system. The party tried to
> combine populism and free market economics, two ideologies that are
> often in conflict because the interest of the "common man" is often in
> conflict with the interests of even small business, let alone the
> larger firms that dominate the New Brunswick political economy. Like
> the supporters of the United Farmers and Social Credit in Alberta,
> COR-NB members believed in the value of the individual and of free
> enterprise, even though the concentration of capital and high levels
> of unemployment are the result of the particular form of
> resource-based capitalism that exists in New Brunswick. The COR Party
> started as a "revolt against the system," though by 1993 the party
> increasingly internalized the system and so the revolt turned inward,
> with all of the venom once reserved only for the New Brunswick Society
> of Acadians and the established parties.
>
> As the economy and job situation in New Brunswick improved somewhat
> after the recession of the early 1990s, COR-NB lost momentum. (Instead
> of scapegoating Acadians as they did in the late 1980s, in 1995 New
> Brunswick Anglophones were more likely to feel aggrieved at the
> Liberal federal government for tightening the Unemployment Insurance
> rules in the 1994 budget, or for its gun control initiative of 1995.)
>
> There is a serious structural problem underlying these internal
> conflicts, in the form of an ideological conflict between Board
> control and caucus control of the party. As has been stated above, the
> party policy is that an elected member is responsible to the
> electorate first, the party second, and the leader last. Yet under its
> constitution the COR Party—and not the elected caucus—selected the
> leader and the Board of Directors could call a leadership convention,
> which inevitably gave the party control over the elected members.
>
> Greg Hargrove (MLA-York North) said in 1993 that the Board overstepped
> its authority in trying to dump then-leader Danny Cameron because the
> Board is answerable to the membership while the caucus is responsible
> to the electorate. By this line of reasoning, the membership can elect
> a leader but cannot remove a leader, which ultimately sounds like the
> "old-line parties" that the COR Party criticized. This suggests an
> inherent contradiction in the party's inversion of the
> "Leader-Party-Electorate" hierarchy, because elected members cannot be
> responsible to the electorate first given the party's power to remove
> the party leader by calling a leadership convention.
>
> Conclusion
>
> COR-NB was a right-of-centre protest party that picked up on the
> tendency of many New Brunswick Anglophones to blame their economic
> woes on Official Bilingualism, big government, and "special interest
> groups." The COR Party went into the vacuum left by the collapse of
> the provincial PCs, aided by the general weakness of political
> opposition in McKenna's first term and the unpopularity of the
> Mulroney government in the Atlantic region. The political culture of
> New Brunswick was, for a brief period, not as traditional as many
> observers claim, because a significant segment of the electorate
> proved that they were willing to try a political alternative to the
> two dominant parties. By making the COR Party the Official Opposition,
> the voters showed that they were prepared to forgo, both as
> individuals and as constituencies, the benefits of having a member on
> the government side of the house.
>
> The COR Party ultimately declined because of the contradiction between
> its anti-party populism and the realities of operating a political
> party in the existing party system. This essay also shows the risks of
> building a new party based on participatory and populist principles
> when it must function in a "democratic" political system that remains
> hierarchical and discourages active, meaningful, mass participation in
> the process of governing between elections. With the election of 1995,
> the voters have again accepted the elitist political system, in which
> a government is judged based on its results—the "bottom line"—and not
> on its style.
>
> The COR Party was formed by a delicate coalition of populists,
> anti-francophone activists, and traditional conservatives. This
> coalition has shattered, and it is unlikely that it will come back
> together in the near future. It may take a generation to rebuild it.
> There is some possibility that populism will make itself felt in the
> coming years, if people increasingly feel alienated from New
> Brunswick's McKenna government and from the Chrétien government in
> Ottawa. The key question is whether any political party can take
> advantage of this populist discontent without itself being consumed by
> its fires.
>
> Notes
>
> 1. More attention is paid to the issue of bilingualism as well as the
> ethnic basis of the party in another article by the same author,
> entitled "The New Brunswick COR Party as an `Ethnic Party'", Canadian
> Review of Studies in Nationalism, forthcoming, 1996, Vol. 23.
>
> 2. See C.B. MacPherson, Democracy in Alberta: Social Credit and the
> Party System, Second Edition, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press,
> 1962), pp. 224-226.
>
> 3. New Brunwick Telegraph Journal, October 4, 1994, p. 1.
>
> 4. Interview with Arch Pafford, Nordin, NB, August 20, 1993.
>
> 5. Sue Calhoun, "Getting to the Core of COR," New Maritimes, 1992,
> vol. 11, No. (2) November/December, p. 15.
>
>
>
> From: "MacPherson, Don"<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:29:42 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Ms Blatchford please allow me to introduce
> you to Google's lawyer David Drummond and Mr Baconfat's buddies in the
> Daily Gleaner Gisele McKnight and Dastardly Don MacPherson
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I'll be out of the office on vacation from Aug. 30 to Sept. 8,
> returning Sept. 9.
>


Integrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
663K View as HTMLScan and download

 

 

 

 

Hey Billy Blair I bet many Yankees are impressed at how many young experts the University of Toronto has these days EH?

$
0
0

 https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies 

 

Image

Methinks those riding LIEbrano gravy train North of the 49th are upset with "The Donald" and his cohorts and have put their propaganda in high gear N'esy Pas?
 
 


https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/republicans-impeachment-two-1.5872561


Republicans ride the Trump train — down to the democracy-rattling end

Fewer than 5 per cent of House Republicans voted to impeach. But the long-term outlook gets messier for Trump

Alexander Panetta· CBC News· Posted: Jan 14, 2021 12:15 AM ET

Image

YO @jsrailton @UofT @munkschool @SecPlanner @JustinTrudeau @erinotoole @CanRevAgency
@CanadianPM @JusticeCanadaEN @jkenney @BillBlair What say you about censorship and tightly controlled messaging on the Canadian and Yankee social media platforms lately?
 

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right

Integrity Yea Right

 

https://www.utoronto.ca/news/how-researcher-u-t-s-citizen-lab-helped-id-capitol-hill-rioters-toronto-star

U of T news

 

""

Members of a violent mob enter in the Senate chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6 as Congress held a joint session to ratify the results of the 2020 election (photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

After a mob stunned the world last week by laying siege to Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., the University of Toronto’s John Scott-Railton sought to identify the masked men and women behind the violence.

Scott-Railton, who works for Citizen Lab at U of T’s Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy in the Faculty of Arts & Science, has been using photo enhancement techniques, open source search techniques and public tips gathered from social media to identify members of the violent throng that sought to overturn the results of the U.S. presidential election, according to a profile of Scott-Railton in the Toronto Star.

In collaboration with the New Yorker magazine, Scott-Railton determined that one individual was a U.S. Air Force combat veteran. Scott-Railton notified the FBI of his suspicions after piecing together the man’s identity through the insignias adorning his helmet and body armor, the New Yorkerpiece said.

Scott-Railton's Capitol Hill project – which has drawn interest from media outlets in the U.S. and around the world, including CNN, USA Today, the Independentand Germany’s Bild online –  is part of his broader Citizen Lab work, which focuses on malware, phishing, online disinformation and other digital threats to civil society.

Scott-Railton told the Star that he has been overwhelmed by input from the general public.

“The volume of tips and information now is unlike anything I have ever seen,” he said.

 

Read more about John Scott-Railton in the Toronto Star

 

 

Image

YO @ggreenwald I disagreed with @jack and @TwitterSupport freezing @DavidRayAmos before Xmass for the benefit of the Green Party BUT Methinks its interesting that @TorontoStar promotes its Fake Left spin in @Twitter yet we must pay to read it N'esy Pas?


https://www.thestar.com/news/world/2021/01/10/how-a-toronto-researcher-is-helping-to-identify-those-who-attacked-us-capitol.html

 

How a Toronto researcher is helping to identify those who attacked U.S. Capitol

Five people, including a police officer, were reported dead following Wednesday’s assault on the U.S. Capitol, when hundreds of rioters ransacked the building.

THIS ARTICLE IS

Exclusive to Subscribers

 

 

https://twitter.com/RenanLevine/with_replies

 

Image
Associate Professor, Teaching Stream, in Dept of Political Science at the University of Toronto Scarborough. Tour de France, wine & Philly sports.
Thornhill, Ontarioindividual.utoronto.ca/renan
Joined August 2011

 

 

Image

 
My job during "politics of usual:" explain the electoral college to Canadians My job during "politics of the unusual:" explain 25th Amendment, impeachment & transaction costs to Canadians My dream job: describe a simple election where the candidate with the most votes won. Fin.
 
 
Image

Jan 10

What Biden policy initiatives will @Jim_Jordan support to help us all come together for the country? He's old enough to remember Ted Kennedy voting for Reagan's first budget, right? #unity

 
Quote Tweet
Manu Raju
@mkraju
·
Rep. Jim Jordan, who helped lead the effort to overturn the presidential election results in Congress, rejects Dem calls to impeach Trump because in part it won’t unify the county. “It’s not healthy for the nation ... I hope we can come together for the country,” he said on Fox
 
Trust that I remember Teddy Baby very well

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right

Integrity Yea Right

 

https://twitter.com/jsrailton/with_replies

 

Image

John Scott-Railton

Contributed? Thank you. Worked a parallel effort? Thank you. Thank you
@RonanFarrow& team + @NewYorker Finally, please join me in recognizing the 1000s at @FBI& other agencies working this with neither public recognition nor much sleep right now.
 
Image
Image

 

 

Automatic reply: Hey Billy Blair I bet many Yankees are impressed at how many young experts the University of Troronto has these days EH?

   
Add star 

Office of the Premier

<Premier@gov.ab.ca>
Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Premier of Alberta.

A state of public health emergency remains in effect in Alberta. For the latest and most accurate information related to the COVID-19 response, visit alberta.ca/covid19 and canada.ca/covid-19.

Workplace guidance and supports to help businesses and non-profits affected by COVID-19 are available at www.alberta.ca/biz-connect.

Stay safe.



Add star 

Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)

<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.  

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your understanding.  

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus. 

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at (506) 453-2144. 

Thank you.

Bonjour,  

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.  

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse. Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.  

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus, veuillez visiter www.gnb.ca/coronavirus. 

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144. 

Merci. 

Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre 

P.O Box/C. P. 6000  

Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick  

E3B 5H1  

Canada 

Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144 

Email/Courriel: premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca 


 

Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario

<Premier@ontario.ca>
Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read, reviewed and taken into consideration.

There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a response may take several business days. 

Thanks again for your email.

______­­

 

Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

Merci encore pour votre courriel.



Add star                                                                                                       Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM

Spurr, Ben

<bspurr@torstar.ca>
     
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


Hi there,

 

I am off today, returning Tuesday, Jan. 12. If you need to reach the newsroom please email city@thestar.ca.

 

If it's an emergency, please try me on my cell phone at 647 400-5566.


Ben Spurr

Toronto Star

Transportation Reporter

c. 647 400-5566

o. 416 869-4547

 



Add star 

Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca

<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see: www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest, veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>




Add star 

O'Toole, Erin - M.P.

<Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca>
Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 9:37 AM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

On behalf of the Hon. Erin O’Toole, thank you for contacting the Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition.

Mr. O’Toole greatly values feedback and input from Canadians.  We read and review every incoming e-mail.  Please note that this account receives a high volume of e-mails.  We reply to e-mails as quickly as possible.

If you are a constituent of Mr. O’Toole’s in Durham with an urgent matter please contact his constituency office at:

Office of Erin O’Toole, M.P.
54 King Street East, Suite 103
Bowmanville, ON L1C 1N3
Tel: (905) 697-1699 or Toll-Free (866) 436-1141

Once again, thank you for writing.

Sincerely,


Office of the Leader of the Official Opposition


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Au nom de l’hon. Erin O’Toole, merci de communiquer avec le Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle.

M. O’Toole apprécie beaucoup le point de vue et les commentaires des Canadiens et des Canadiennes. Nous lisons tous les courriels que nous recevons. Veuillez noter que ce compte reçoit beaucoup de courriels. Nous y répondons le plus rapidement possible.

Si vous êtes un électeur ou une électrice de M. O’Toole dans la circonscription de Durham et que vous avez une question urgente, veuillez communiquer avec son bureau de circonscription, au :

Bureau d’Erin O’Toole, député
54, rue King Est, bureau 103
Bowmanville (Ontario) L1C 1N3
Tél. : (905) 697-1699 ou sans frais : (866) 436-1141

Encore une fois merci d’avoir pris le temps d’écrire.

Veuillez agréer nos salutations distinguées,


Bureau du chef de l’Opposition officielle

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:37:09 -0400
Subject: Hey Billy Blair I bet many Yankees are impressed at how many
young experts the University of Troronto has these days EH?
To: jsr@johnscottrailton.com, bspurr@thestar.ca, "Bill.Blair"
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, "blaine.higgs"
<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, renan.levine@utoronto.ca,
"erin.otoole"<erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>

https://www.utoronto.ca/news/u-t-expert-calls-capitol-hill-violence-extremely-disturbing-challenge-american-democracy

U of T expert calls Capitol Hill violence an ‘extremely disturbing
challenge to American democracy’

Hundreds of supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump stormed the
Capitol building in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, halting a joint
session of Congress in which votes cast by the Electoral College were
set to be counted – a standard procedural step in the presidential
election process.

The mob broke windows and clashed with police, while members of the
House and Senate, as well as Vice-President Mike Pence, were evacuated
from the building.

The National Guard was summoned to bolster security amid the violence,
which came after Trump addressed supporters at a Washington, D.C.
rally and refused to concede the election to President-elect Joe
Biden.

U of T News spoke with Renan Levine, an associate professor, teaching
stream, in the department of political science at the University of
Toronto Scarborough, about what the unrest means for the U.S., its
democratic processes and the future of the Republican party going
forward.

How unprecedented is the unrest in Washington, D.C.?

When we look around the world, yes, violence often accompanies
elections and losing sides do contest – sometimes violently – the
transfer of power. But that has not happened on this scale in America
since the 1800s.

As inspiring as it is to hear President-elect Joe Biden talk about
“this is not America,” the truth is that violence has certainly been
used before and after U.S. Election Day, especially against racialized
minorities. That gives a lot of us tremendous pause watching these
images. This is a day when an African-American man and a Jewish man
were elected senators from the state of Georgia – a state that has
lynched both Jewish and African-American men in its past.

This is a big deal and this attempt by people who are waving Trump
flags and Confederate flags are clearly evoking a history of violence
towards racialized minorities. Racialized minorities are being told
that, somehow, their votes don’t count or should not matter in the
same way that other voters’ votes should count or should matter.

What does the refusal of President Trump and his supporters to accept
the results of the election mean for American democracy?

Today should have been a boring, staid day. But it wasn’t. It quickly
became identified by the president and many of his supporters as the
day to stage a protest, to stage an insurrection in opposition to what
should have happened today – which was a pro forma reporting and
accepting of the election results.

There have been previous incidents where members of the House and
Senate have objected to some aspect of the returns, but that was
always in races where the opponent had already conceded, and they were
objecting in order to bring attention to some concern, some issue with
the process – which is very different. This isn’t raising a concern –
both what is happening and as led by a number of senators and members
of Congress – this was them saying, “No. We want to stop certification
of results and we are going to continue to signal that we do not
accept these results.”

So, this is a new and extremely disturbing challenge to American
democracy, including American democratic institutions and American
democratic norms, that has ensured peaceful and largely uneventful
transfers of power.

Is there any mechanism to forcibly remove President Trump from office?

Mechanisms within the 25th Amendment have been followed, but the
amendment has never been used. The 25th Amendment, I think, would be
dangerous in these circumstances.

It would certainly be fast, but it’s designed for when the president,
for various reasons, is incapable of leading – like if the president
is comatose or if the president is going to go under general
anesthesia for a short time. It allows for a transfer of power to the
vice-president or, in the absence of a vice-president, to the speaker
of the house in the event the president is incapable of carrying out
his or her responsibilities.

I don’t think it’s designed for this kind of situation, where people
like myself are concerned that the president is derelict in his
responsibilities to uphold the constitution. That recourse is very
clearly set out in the constitution and that’s an impeachment.

Where does the Republican party go from here?

One of the things Canadians need to remember is that one of the
hallmarks of American political parties is the lack of strong central
control over who gets party nominations and what the party says.

Before the violent protests today, there was a reckoning going on.
There were Republicans, some of whom had been stalwart Trump
supporters, saying the election is over and we need to accept these
results; others were saying that millions of Americans have concerns
and we should be taking every step to protect our democracy and ensure
that those concerns are addressed in a way that gives people
confidence in the democratic process.

There will be a struggle and that struggle will likely continue
because it’s not like there are mechanisms saying that Minority Leader
Mitch McConnell will be able to say “Okay, I’m throwing you guys out
of the caucus,” or “I’m firing you, you’re gone.” They could kick
people out of the caucus, but it’s highly unlikely.

When it comes to nominations, they may withhold an endorsement, but
one of the current Republican senators, Lisa Murkowski, was already
elected after being defeated in a Republican primary by someone else.

So, they don’t have a lot of control. They’re probably going to be
fighting. We’re probably going to see, in a year’s time when there are
some gubernatorial races or in two years’ time and certainly in four
years’ time, fights within the Republican party as to whether or not
they’re going to completely reject Trumpism or whether there’s going
to be some element of continued embrace of Trump the man or Trump the
ideology.


Renan Levine
Department of Political Science
University of Toronto - Scarborough

Office: (416) 208-2651
renan.levine@utoronto.ca

https://www.utoronto.ca/news/how-researcher-u-t-s-citizen-lab-helped-id-capitol-hill-rioters-toronto-star

How a researcher at U of T's Citizen Lab helped ID Capitol Hill
rioters: Toronto Star
""
Members of a violent mob enter in the Senate chamber on Capitol Hill
in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6 as Congress held a joint session to
ratify the results of the 2020 election (photo by Win McNamee/Getty
Images)

After a mob stunned the world last week by laying siege to Capitol
Hill in Washington, D.C., the University of Toronto’s John
Scott-Railton sought to identify the masked men and women behind the
violence.

Scott-Railton, who works for Citizen Lab at U of T’s Munk School of
Global Affairs & Public Policy in the Faculty of Arts & Science, has
been using photo enhancement techniques, facial recognition software
and public tips gathered from social media to identify members of the
violent throng that sought to overturn the results of the U.S.
presidential election, according to a profile of Scott-Railton in the
Toronto Star.

In collaboration with the New Yorker magazine, Scott-Railton
determined that one individual was a U.S. Air Force combat veteran.
Scott-Railton notified the FBI of his suspicions after piecing
together the man’s identity through the insignias adorning his helmet
and body armor, the New Yorker piece said.

Scott-Railton's Capitol Hill project – which has drawn interest from
media outlets in the U.S. and around the world, including CNN, USA
Today, the Independent and Germany’s Bild online –  is part of his
broader Citizen Lab work, which focuses on malware, phishing, online
disinformation and other digital threats to civil society.

Scott-Railton told the Star that he has been overwhelmed by input from
the general public.

“The volume of tips and information now is unlike anything I have ever
seen,” he said.

Read more about John Scott-Railton in the Toronto Star



lhttps://www.thestar.com/news/world/2021/01/10/how-a-toronto-researcher-is-helping-to-identify-those-who-attacked-us-capitol.html?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=SocialMedia&utm_campaign=GTA&utm_content=

Five people, including a police officer, were reported dead following
Wednesday’s assault on the U.S. Capitol, when hundreds of rioters
ransacked the building.
World
How a Toronto researcher is helping to identify those who attacked U.S. Capitol

By Ben SpurrTransportation Reporter
Sun., Jan. 10, 2021

As the world tries to understand how a violent crowd intent on
overturning the presidential election managed to break into the U.S.
Capitol last week, John Scott-Railton is grappling with another
question: who did it?

Since Wednesday’s deadly attack in Washington, D.C., Scott-Railton, a
senior researcher at the Citizen Lab at the University of Toronto’s
Munk School of Global Affairs, has been trying to identify members of
the mob that briefly paralyzed American government.

THIS ARTICLE IS
Exclusive to Subscribers

Only $1.92 a week for your first year.

https://www.johnscottrailton.com/

I research malware, phishing and disinformation as a Senior Researcher
at The Citizen Lab.

Watch a recent talk at the CCC (w/brilliant colleague Bill Marczak),
check out my publications, or read my occasional personal research
blog.

Ben Spurr
Transportation Reporter
416-869-4547
bspurr@thestar.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 20:48:02 -0400
Subject: Mr Abraham I agreed with the actions of Governor Jim Justice
and Attorney General Patrick Morrisey I have no doubt that they and
Derrick Evans and his lawyer Mr Bryan should agree that the best
defense against a corrupt justice system is to expose their many
wrongs
To: Brian.R.Abraham@wv.gov, Lindsay.S.See@wvago.gov,
JHB@johnbryanlaw.com, ATFTips@atf.gov, dfritz@wvnstv.com,
news@wvnstv.com, vsullivan@wvnstv.com
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
info@kevinstankiewicz.com, cnbctips@nbcuni.com,
jordan.l.damron@wv.gov, consumer@wvago.gov

https://www.wvnstv.com/news/west-virginia/morrisey-wv-will-join-lawsuit-to-us-supreme-court-on-voting-irregularities/

Morrisey: WV will join lawsuit to US Supreme Court on voting irregularities
West Virginia
Posted: Jan 11, 2021 / 03:39 PM EST     

CHARLESTON, WV (WOWK) – West Virginia Attorney General Patrick
Morrisey says the state will join a lawsuit out of Texas alleging
voting irregularities before the U.S. Supreme Court.

The suit seeks to block the Electoral College votes of Georgia,
Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconson – all were battleground states
which President Donald Trump won in 2016 but lost in 2020.

“Many Americans and West Virginians have seen their confidence in the
electoral system undermined,” said Morrisey in a written statement “as
they watch one report after another outlining the many, many problems
with the 2020 elections. That must change”

Morrisey says Texas wants the nation’s highest court to consider
“..the many irregular, highly problematic and unconstitutional actions
that have occured..” during the 2020 elections.

“The possibility of us entering suit or entering the suit in which
West Virginia is basically saying, y’know, we want our rights in how
the votes were counted and everything,” Governor Jim Justice (R) said
during his Wednesday COVID-19 briefing. “We handled ourselves exactly
how it should have been handled here in this state and we, absolutely
and overwhelmingly, voted for President Trump, and we want President
Trump to be able to have his due, and I don’t know where the attorney
general is on that, but I would surely encourage and only encourage
from the standpoint of just doing this.”

In filing the suit against the four battleground states, Texas
Attorney General Ken Paxtin sated “These elections in other states
where state law was not followed…affects my voters because these are
national elections, and so if there are fraudulent things or things
that affect an election and state law is not followed as is required
by the Constitution it affects our state.”

The challenge would affect 62 Electoral College votes from the four
states, and if the court rules in favor of Texas would give Trump a
second term.

To date each state has certified their elections results as fair and
accurate as of the “Safe Harbor” deadline of Monday December 7th.

Tuesday the Supreme Court dismissed a Trump re-election campaign
lawsuit against the Pennsylvania’s mail-in voting results with a
one-sentence denial with not noted dissents – including Trumps three
appointed Justices.

To date, of the 51 lawsuits the president’s team has filed in multiple
states, only one has been upheld.

Copyright 2021 Nexstar Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not
be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

https://www.wvnstv.com/news/lawsuit-over-the-2020-general-election-prompts-response-from-wv-naacp/

Lawsuit over the 2020 General Election prompts response from WV NAACP
News

by: Douglas Fritz
Posted: Jan 11, 2021 / 05:36 PM EST     

CHARLESTON, WV (WVNS) — The West Virginia chapter of the National
Association of the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is calling
for the removal of West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey.
The action comes in response to the Attorney General entering West
Virginia into a lawsuit over the results of the 2020 General Election.

The Attorney General announced WV will join a lawsuit from Texas that
alleges voting irregularities in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and
Wisconsin. The suit was announced on Dec. 9. It was presented before
the U.S. Supreme Court.

In a release on Monday, Jan. 11, 2021 the WV NAACP contends Morrisey’s
participation in the lawsuit disenfranchises voters in the four
battleground states. It labels the efforts as racist, unethical and
un-American.

The group is now calling for Morrisey’s removal as the the Attorney
General and for him to be disbarred in the upcoming WV Legislative
Session. The effort is supported by Delegates Danielle Walker (D –
Monongalia, 51), Mike Pushkin (D- Kanawha, 37) and Barbara Fleischauer
(D – Monongalia , 51) who will present the resolution.

59News reached out to Attorney General Morrisey regarding the release
from the WV NAACP. He provided the following response:

    I strongly condemned violence at the U.S. Capitol as it happened
Jan. 6 and continue to do so.

    It’s absolutely wrong for these radical, far-left delegates and
their allies to make allegations out of thin air and try to politicize
the death of a brave law enforcement official and other individuals.

    Our December brief sought to fully investigate allegations that
several states had not properly interpreted their own laws as they
conducted their elections. It’s absolutely appropriate for a state
attorney general to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to get the law right —
holding free and fair elections should be one of the most important
goals of our republic. That’s what that brief focused on.
    Patrick Morrisey, WV Attorney General

Valerie Sullivan
(304) 929-6418
vsullivan@wvnstv.com

Social Media/Web Director
Douglas Fritz
(304) 929-6420
dfritz@wvnstv.com


https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/11/gop-west-virginia-gov-jim-justice-calls-pro-trump-riot-despicable.html

GOP West Virginia governor calls pro-Trump Capitol riot ‘despicable,’
urges country over party
Published Mon, Jan 11 202112:12 PM EST
Kevin Stankiewicz


https://www.wvnstv.com/top-stories/gov-justice-appoints-new-chief-of-staff-effective-2021/

 Gov. Justice appoints new Chief of Staff, effective 2021
Posted: Dec 23, 2020 / 12:53 PM EST     

CHARLESTON, WV (WVNS) — Gov. Jim Justice announced on Wednesday, Dec.
23, 2020 Brian Abraham will become his new Chief of Staff, effective
Jan. 1, 2021.

Abraham has served as part of Justice’s General Counsel since January
2017. He also currently serves as Chair of the Joint Staff in the WV
National Guard.

https://wvmetronews.com/2021/01/09/derrick-evans-resigns-w-va-house-after-entering-u-s-capitol-with-mob/

Derrick Evans resigns W.Va. House after entering U.S. Capitol with mob
By Brad McElhinny
January 9, 2021 - 1:51 pm

https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/three-men-charged-connection-events-us-capitol

Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
District of Columbia
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Saturday, January 9, 2021
Three Men Charged in Connection with Events at U.S. Capitol

            WASHINGTON - Three men were charged today in federal court
in the District of Columbia in connection with the riots at the U.S.
Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021.

            Jacob Anthony Chansley, a.k.a. Jake Angeli, of Arizona,
was charged with knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted
building or grounds without lawful authority, and with violent entry
and disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. Chansley was taken into
custody today.

            It is alleged that Chansley was identified as the man seen
in media coverage who entered the Capitol building dressed in horns, a
bearskin headdress, red, white and blue face paint, shirtless, and tan
pants. This individual carried a spear, approximately 6 feet in
length, with an American flag tied just below the blade.

            Adam Johnson, 36, of Florida, was charged with one count
of knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or
grounds without lawful authority; one count of theft of government
property; and one count of violent entry and disorderly conduct on
Capitol grounds. Johnson was arrested yesterday and is currently in
custody.

            It is alleged that on Jan. 6, 2021, Johnson illegally
entered the United States Capitol and removed the Speaker of the
House’s lectern from where it had been stored on the House side of the
Capitol building. A search of open sources led law enforcement to
Johnson, who is allegedly seen in a widely circulated photo inside the
Capitol carrying the lectern.

            Derrick Evans, 35, of West Virginia, was charged with one
count of knowingly entering or remaining in any restricted building or
grounds without lawful authority; and one count of violent entry and
disorderly conduct on Capitol Grounds. Evans was taken into custody
Friday.

            It is alleged that on Jan. 6, 2021, Evans, a recently
elected member of the West Virginia House of Delegates, streamed live
to his Facebook page a video of himself joining and encouraging a
crowd unlawfully entering the U.S. Capitol. In the video, Evans is
allegedly seen crossing the threshold of the doorway into the U.S.
Capitol and shouting, “We’re in, we’re in! Derrick Evans is in the
Capitol!”

            These cases are being prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s
Office for the District of Columbia and investigated by the FBI’s
Washington Field Office and the United States Capitol Police.

            The information contained in the charging documents are
merely allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent until proven
guilty.

            The ATF and FBI continue to urge the public to report
suspected use of explosive devices, or violent, destructive acts
associated with the recent unrest. Anyone with information can call
1-888-ATF-TIPS (1-888-283-8477), email ATFTips@atf.gov or submit
information anonymously via ReportIt.com.

            The FBI is looking for individuals who may have incited or
promoted violence of any kind. Anyone with digital material or tips
can call 1-800-CALL-FBI (800-225-5324) or submit images or videos at
fbi.gov/USCapitol.Hansley SOFEvans complaint affidavitJohnson SOF


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:02:57 -0400
Subject: Sen. Doug Mastriano or a clever jounalist such as his pal
Wendy Bell should have got back to me before the shit hit the fan in
DC EH Jerome Corsi???
To: WendyBellRadio@gmail.com, dmastriano@pasen.gov,
matthew@depernolaw.com, miag@michigan.gov, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, info@lionelmedia.com,
liveneedtoknow@gmail.com, tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com,
press@deepcapture.com, jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com,
susan@susanbradford.org
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, lauralynnlive
<lauralynnlive@gmail.com>, tracy <tracy@uncoverdc.com>,
action@mediamatters.org, press@mediamatters.org

https://www.mediamatters.org/january-6-insurrection/pa-state-sen-doug-mastriano-called-effort-overturn-election-death-match

PA state Sen. Doug Mastriano called effort to overturn election a
“death match with the Democrat Party” shortly before heading to
insurrection attempt

Mastriano made his remarks to radio host Eric Metaxas, who previously
said: “We need to fight to the death, to the last drop of blood
because it's worth it.”

Written by Eric Hananoki

Published 01/11/21 2:17 PM EST

For press inquiries please contact press@mediamatters.org or 202.772.8195.

TSend news tips about misinformation to Media Matters at
action@mediamatters.org.


On 1/3/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/attn-sidney-powell-et-al-i-just-called.html
>
>
> https://www.michigan.gov/ag/0,4534,7-359-82100---,00.html
>
>
> Attorney General Dana Nessel
> G. Mennen Williams Building
> 525 W. Ottawa Street
> P.O. Box 30212
> Lansing, MI 48909
> Phone: 517-335-7622
> Email: miag@michigan.gov
>
>
https://www.depernolaw.com/
>
>
>
> DePerno Law Office
> 951 W. Milham Avenue
> Portage, MI 49002
> 269.321.5064 office/voice
> 269.491.0213 mobile/text
> matthew@depernolaw.com
>
>
> Listen to the Attorney Behind Michigan's Dominion Voting System AUDIT! WOW!
> 9,363 views
> •Streamed live on Dec 16, 2020
> 52412ShareSave
> Wendy Bell Radio
> 12K subscribers
> This WEDNESDAY MONOLOGUE is downright HUGE with attorney Matthew
> DePerno - the man who conducted the extensive voting system audit in
> Michigan - joining the show!! Listen now as he refutes allegations of
> "election irregularities" and proves emphatically that there was
> OUTRIGHT FRAUD in the 2020 general election!
>
>
> 2020 Election Fraud Defense Fund was established by Matthew DePerno to
> defend and to protect the integrity of elections in the United States.
> Please contribute below, using our secure system. Your donation will
> support our mission and the welfare of American democracy. Our mission
> is to protect and defend the lawful votes of American citizens, ensure
> election integrity, educate others about the United States
> constitution, and pursue legal action to preserve the vision of our
> Founders and to maintain this great Republic. <CONTRIBUTE>
> Matthew S. DePerno, Esq.
> PictureMatthew S. DePerno Matthew DePerno is an attorney who serves
> clients worldwide from his office in Kalamazoo Michigan, USA.  His
> experience and record of success has benefited individuals, small
> business, and multi-national corporations.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Tweets by ‎@mdeperno
>
>     Matthew S. DePerno, Esq. @mdeperno
>
>     Thank you Mike Dakkak @itnshow for a fair and honest article. It's
> not that difficult @CraigDMauger. And point of clarification, SOS
> Benson never did an audit of Antrim County. She did a hand recount.
> Big difference. https://twitter.com/itnshow/status/1344060767713296389
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:07:53 -0400
> Subject: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in
> Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
> To: info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com,
> tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com,
> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach
> <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
> news <news@dailygleaner.com>, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>, Nathalie
> Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu
> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, tracy@uncoverdc.com
> Cc: James@jamesfetzer.com, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, editor@americanthinker.com,
> jeromecorsi6554 <jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com>, susan@susanbradford.org
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNv-DoZ-6Dk&feature=emb_title
>
> Patrick Byrne dropping MOABS exclusively on SteelTruth
> •Streamed live on Dec 22, 2020
> Ann Vandersteel
> SteelTruth Weeknights 9pm ET
>
>
> SteelTruth™
>
> (561) 320-2464
> P.O. Box 3074
> Tequesta, FL 33469
> tips@steeltruth.com
> media@steeltruth.com
>
>
> Press Inquires: press@deepcapture.com or phone (480) 692-9336
>
> At the time much of the content on DeepCapture.com was written, the
> Great Financial Crisis of 2008 was either on the verge of happening or
> had just occurred. In those days, emotions among this publication’s
> contributors were raw and, in an effort to get their warnings noticed
> and appropriate blame placed, occasionally hyperbolic language and
> shocking imagery were employed. Were we to write these entries today,
> a different tone would prevail.
>
> Yet, being a record of a pivotal time in our global economic history,
> we’ve decided to leave the rawness unedited, with the proviso that
> readers take the context of the creation of certain posts into
> account, and that those easily offended re-consider the decision to
> read them.
>
> https://radioinfluence.com/2020/12/21/dark-to-light-a-meeting-with-the-president/
>
>
> Dark To Light: A Meeting With The President
> Radio Influence Staff
> December 21, 2020
> 3
>
> Patrick Byrne joins us today for a passionate conversation about his
> meeting with the President of the United States. There isn’t a need
> for many show notes.
>
> If there was ever an episode of the show you need to share with your
> friends and family, this is it.
>
> Follow Tracy Beanz on Twitter, subscribe to her YouTube channel, and
> check out her newest venture, UncoverDC.com!
>
> Follow Frank on Twitter, subscribe to his YouTube channel, and follow
> his solo podcast, Quite Frankly!
> Subscribe to Dark To Light With Frank & Beanz on Apple Podcasts,
> Stitcher, TuneIn Radio, Google Play, the iHeartRadio app, and now on
> Spotify!
>
>
> YO Jimmy Fetzer we talked again today after 16 very long years Correct?
>
> https://jamesfetzer.com/
>
> James H. Fetzer
> Legal Defense Fund
> 800 Violet Lane
> Oregon, WI   53575
> (608) 835-2707
> James@JamesFetzer.com
>
>
> Now say Hey to the Yankee lawyer in Hells Kitchen Mikey Leron who
> calls himself  "Lionel" in Youtue and other so called free thinkers
> then go figure why I am so pissed off
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_M4lTc5sLw&t=7s&ab_channel=GiuseppeVafanculoNeedtoKnow%3ATheFetzerReport
>
>
> Need to Know: The Fetzer Report World Premiere
> •Streamed live on Sep 3, 2020
> Giuseppe Vafanculo Need to Know: The Fetzer Report
> The first episode Special Report Features Professor Jim Fetzer along
> with commentators Giuseppe Vafanculo from Revolution Radio and Susan
> Bradford Author & Muckraking Journalist
>
>
> http://susanbradford.org/about.php
>
> Susan was lead investigative journalist in the Abramoff investigation,
> exposing the machinations of the Deep State within Indian Country and
> Bob Mueller's partisan prosecution of Republican superlobbyist Jack
> Abramoff and the executives of Enron. She has broken a number of
> stories that have been picked up by ABC News and other national media.
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/uudM2hYNgSgv/
>
>
> Jim Fetzer
>
> 2211 subscribers
>
> Need to Know Episode 93 (23 December 2020) with Giuseppe Vafanculo and
> David Scorpio. Whistleblower shares witnessing traitorous betrayal of
> Trump at Friday night White House Meeting. Trump appoints Sidney
> Powell Special Counsel, traitors in White House block her entry. Jenna
> Ellis calls out traitor Barr. Pence lets down Trump again. More and
> more election fraud revealed. Some GOP Congressmen will challenge
> electoral fraud on House floor. Trump threatens to veto stimulus bill
> unless direct payments upped to $2,000. Drunken Pelosi parties
> maskless with no social distancing--traitorous HYPOCRITE! 5 key
> elements to scamdemic. Who finally admits most PCR tests reveal
> nothing but the common cold. 3,150 MRNA ejection recipients sickened
> enough to require hospitalization. 50% of US States plan to deny White
> People the MRNA quackccination. Russian scientist who worked on COVID
> quackccine stabbed, falls out of window (another suicide). Netanyahu
> government collapses, 4th Israeli election in 2 years
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beTDI9WggNY&t=1346s&ab_channel=LionelNation
>
> America the Unrecognizable
> 9,600 views
> Streamed live on Dec 23, 2020
> Lionel Nation
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lionel Media <info@lionelmedia.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:16:31 +0000
> Subject: The New Lionel Nation Channel
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Remember what it was like to think dangerously? When expression and
> thought weren't throttled. When we questioned everything.
>
>
> ** “Censorship reflects society’s lack of confidence in itself. It is
> a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.” – Potter Stewart
> ------------------------------
------------------------------
> View this email in your browser
> (https://us14.campaign-archive.com/?e=4dcb13a46e&u=aaca0d56ddaf02ef4aa46f516&id=04990bcd04)
>
> Here’s the news. I’ve a new channel. A new platform. A new paid
> subscription membership
> (https://lionelmedia.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) . It’s
> not on any social media platform. It’s LionelMedia
> (https://lionelmedia.com/) . New and improved. Remember when thinking
> was dangerous and unregulated? You know. Freedom of speech. Freedom of
> thought, expression, belief. Unfettered, unencumbered, unplugged.
> Remember? Sounds too good to be true. But it’s happening. Here
> (https://lionelmedia.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) .
> Countering the deep state, police state, intel state, shadow
> government and ruling class #BigTech fascists. Ahem.
>
> My story. Tuesday morning, 11 September 2001 CE. Redpilled. Big time.
> Everything changed for me and I haven’t been the same since. I was in
> NYC and couldn’t believe what I was seeing. And then I couldn’t
> believe what I was reading and seeing on TV. But the truth was online.
> This was before social media and Twatter, Fecesbook and that other
> thing. It was Wild West Internet. The theories and hypotheses were
> exploding. Many daft, many deranged and many spot-on and deadly
> accurate. Perfect. We were called Truthers. Translation: People who
> didn’t believe the official account (for a variety of reasons).
> Imagine that, derided for wanting the truth. And it was fun and cool
> and dangerous. And great.
>
> But wait, there’s more. If you want to question vaccine safety
> especially as to kids and you’re not RFK Jr. with Kennedy immunity,
> you’re an Anti-Vaxxer and you’re off social media. Remember in 2016
> when tough guy wannabe and overrated actor Bobby De Niro dared to
> screen “Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe”? Seems that tough guy
> Bobby got whacked and backed down. As the NYT reported
> (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/movies/robert-de-niro-pulls-anti-vaccine-documentary-from-tribeca-film-festival.html)
> : “Facing a storm of criticism over its plan to show a documentary
> about the widely debunked link between vaccines and autism, the
> Tribeca Film Festival on Saturday pulled the film from its schedule
> next month.” Did you catch that? Widely debunked link between vaccines
> and autism. You’d better say it’s debunked or you’ll go the way of
> Jenny McCarthy. Who? (Precisely.)
>
> I said there was more. Doubt that UBL was dispatched in a gun battle
> in Abbottabad and tossed into the drink à la Luca Brasi with not one
> single morgue shot available and question the seemingly endless
> passels of ex-Navy SEALs who swear they single-handedly plugged Osama
> bin Forgotten, you’re a Deather. Ditto for questioning Saddam’s phone
> cam dispatch. Unsure as to Barry O’s provenance (and you can think
> Hillary C for that one), you’re a Birther (and a racist). Think that
> masks don’t work (as Fauci said repeatedly) other than to steam up
> glasses and perpetuate the culture of anonymity, you’re a Masker. (OK,
> I made that one up). Bottom line, if you don’t regurgitate the pap,
> the story line, you’re on your own. And for most folks they couldn’t
> care less. Just let them pose half nude in front of a bathroom mirror
> or perseverate the illusion and fantasy of hotness via beauty app and
> they’re fine. That’s the way it works. Addict folks to social media
> and then demand that they abide by the
> rules of insipidity or lose their exhibitionist license. Sorry,
> Sparky, not for me.
>
> Then, it all changed. After social media hooked everyone with an
> unlimited narcissism stage it changed the rules. Don’t talk at all of
> the aforementioned or anything about hydroxychloroquine, stolen
> elections, Biden’s profligate son, China, geoengineering, the
> conspiracy theory du jour, pro-Trump ideations, “hate speech” and any
> of the forbidden phobias or Poof! Off you go. Be gone. Demonetization,
> shadow-banning, prohibition in toto, suspension, exceptions, labeling,
> cautionary warnings. Systematic destruction of random and erstwhile
> protected thought. You will be relegated and exiled in social media
> Elba.
>
> I need my own platform. I'm being second-guessed, sanctioned,
> penalized, throttled, demonetized. And for what exactly? Especially
> now with a spate of ex-Mafia made channels regaling you with lurid
> tales of hits and murder and "the life." (Whither omertà?) That’s OK.
> But dare to discuss COVID therapeutics and you’re Elvis. Sorry. Look,
> there’s nothing wrong with making money from the dissemination of
> opinion and analysis. We’re capitalists, after all. (That’s still
> legal. Right, AOC?) I want to say what I want and share it with the
> world for comments and reactions and reasonable pecuniary support.
> It’s what I’ve been doing professionally for 33 years inter alia.
> Heritage MSM news platforms are dead. Shock jocks are dinosaurs.
> Nothing shocks anymore. Other than the level of censorship. The only
> thing available of any informational truth value is citizen/civilian,
> alternative and foreign media. And this.
>
> Our mailing address is:
>
> Lionel Media
> The Lebron Firm
> 745 5th Avenue, 5th Floor
> New York, New York 10151
>
>
> https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/overstocks_colorful_founder_has_tales_to_tell_about_the_russia_hoax.html
>
> December 23, 2020
> Overstock's colorful founder has tales to tell about the Russia hoax
> By Andrea Widburg
>
> Patrick Byrne, Overstock's founder, has long suspected that Obama set
> up a police intelligence state that's been calling the shots in
> American politics since 2015.  On Sunday, he pushed back against those
> of Trump's legal advisers demanding surrender.  On Tuesday, he claimed
> that Obama had blackmailed Hillary Clinton to own her politically.  If
> that's true, what Byrne is saying can upend the American political
> scene.
>
> The New Yorker profiled Byrne early in December.  Sheelah Kolhatkar,
> who wrote the profile, thinks Byrne is probably as crazy as John
> McAfee, with both given over to life-destroying conspiracy theories.
> Kolhatkar plays fair, though, and cannot deny his brilliance.
>
>     Former employees describe a memory trick he likes to perform, in
> which he studies a deck of cards for a few minutes and then recites
> back the order of the cards, one by one. "When he's on, he's smart,
> charming, complex, and brilliant," Marc Cohodes, who was once a critic
> of Overstock and is now an investor in the company, told me.
>
> While Byrne may be eccentric, he's often right.  He was the first to
> realize that investment firms and stock traders were colluding to
> drive stock prices down.  He was accused of being paranoid, but the
> financial crisis proved he was correct.  Additionally, while Byrne's
> tales about his adventures sound like fiction, that doesn't mean they
> are:
>
>     David Luban, a professor of law at Georgetown University who has
> known Byrne since teaching him as an undergraduate, observed that
> improbable things seem to happen to Byrne with remarkable frequency.
> "He's a hard man to bet against," Luban said. "So many of his stories
> that have seemed utterly incredible turn out to be true."
>
> Byrne's biggest adventure was his relationship with Maria Butina, who
> was later convicted of acting as an unregistered Russian foreign
> agent.  When she approached him, he was worried enough to report that
> fact to the FBI and was surprised when the Fibbies were unconcerned.
> Throughout their one-and-a-half-year affair, Byrne kept the FBI
> apprised.
>
> Eventually, Byrne decided that the FBI were the baddies, and were
> setting up Butina, who was arrested in July 2018:
>
>     By then, Byrne's suspicions about the F.B.I. had crystallized into
> a belief that he had been part of a plot by high-ranking members of
> the Obama Administration to commit political espionage, in an attempt
> to control the next President.
>
> Byrne also claims that the Obama administration planned the Russia
> hoax as early as 2015:
>
>     According to the government's version of events, the F.B.I. opened
> Crossfire Hurricane, its investigation into possible ties between the
> Trump campaign and the Russian government, on July 31, 2016, after it
> found out that the Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos had told
> an Australian diplomat that he'd heard that Russians had compromising
> information about Hillary Clinton. Byrne claims that it all really
> started a year earlier, when the F.B.I. became aware of his
> relationship with Butina.
>
> We know that the government's account — that they opened the
> investigation on July 31, 2016 — is a lie.  A July 28, 2016 Peter
> Strzok text to Lisa Page refers to already open counter-intelligence
> investigations.  Moreover, Clinton and the DNC had hired Fusion GPS in
> April 2016 to investigate Trump's alleged Russian ties.  Byrne thinks
> Strzok was an architect of the Russia hoax and used Byrne's
> relationship with Butina to further it.
>
> Strzok denies all knowledge of Bryne and Butina.  As a reminder, this is
> Strzok:
>
> Peter Strzok's creepy smirks freak out Twitter audience
>
> On Sunday, Bryne spoke about a meeting in the Oval Office and claimed
> that Trump's legal advisers are betraying him by urging him not to
> fight massive election fraud:
>
> Now Byrne has gone on record to say that he was part of a 2015 sting
> operation that saw Hillary accept multi-million-dollar bribes from
> foreign governments.  Byrne thought the sting was to reveal Hillary's
> criminality, only to discover that it was to give Obama a hold over
> her when (as everyone assumed) she entered the White House.  You can
> see the video clip here in which Byrne explains that Obama had used
> the Deep State to set up a blackmail operation.
>
> The big question is whether Byrne is a fabulist, whose utterances we
> should ignore — or is he, instead, a brilliant, successful, connected,
> often prescient man who's currently a voice in the wilderness and
> should be taken very seriously?  I don't have an answer for that, but
> his statements seem consistent with what we know about Hillary's
> corruption and the Obama Deep State, including the FBI.
>
> Image: Patrick Byrne Interview with Ann Vandersteel.  YouTube screen grab.
>
> Staff
> Editor and Publisher  —       Thomas Lifson
> Deputy Editor         —       J.R. Dunn
> Deputy Editor         —       Drew Belsky
> Deputy Editor, Graphics consultant
> (i.e., drop Manager, Social Media)    —       Monica Showalter
> Deputy Editor         —       Andrea Widburg
> Co-founders   —       Richard Baehr, Ed Lasky
>
>
>
> Those were your latest videos now enjoy one mine from 2007 published a
> full year before the RCMP falsely arrested me after the FBI had
> arrested the Yankee Goveno Spitzer in Washington
> Obviously (I reloaded It in this YouTube Channel after Google bought
> YouTube and maliciously deleted my old faithful account)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVGHg0jlVWk&ab_channel=MaritimeMalaise
>
> RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
> 1,586 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> Below is a true copy of my latest email It was sent today to Sidney
> Powell byway of her webpage format The lawyers found below will get
> regular email just like I have done with you people (I already called
> them all and spoke to some and left messages with the rest)
>
>
> Perhaps all you lawyers should check my work from years ago and call
> me back  ASAP???
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/265620671/Cross-Border-Txt
>
>
> On 12/13/20, Pam Stavropoulos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
>> Thank you David!
>>
>> Really appreciate wide dissemination of these concerns as you clearly
>> recognise.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pam S.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Raymond Amos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au>
>> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2020 2:16 PM
>> To: pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au
>> Subject: Contact Form submission from
>> http://pamstavropoulos.com.au/contact/
>>
>> Sender's name: David Raymond Amos
>> E-mail: David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com
>> Phone: 506 434 8433
>>
>> Message: ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 23:14:01 -0400
>> Subject: ATTN Yanis Varoufakis and Pam Stavropoulos I just tweeted about
>> your concerns about Julian Assange and global economy etc
>> To: y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
>> Cc: motomaniac333
>>
>> Yanis Varoufakis
>> Web Site:
>>     https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu
>> Email:
>>     y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
>> Address:
>>     Parliament Mansion (Megaro Voulis), GR10021
>> Athens / Tel. +30 2103707568 / Fax +30 2103707570.
>>
>> Check out the attachment for USA litigation over 18 years ago
>>
>>
>> Please notice that the webcasts and transcripts of this hearing went
>> missing not long  before the economy crashed in 2008 Find the letter
>> fom Spitzer to me on page 12 within the document I offer as
>> "Integrity-Yea-Right" and ask yourself why Assaage has never metioned
>> me In fact I bet that you folks won't either
>>
>> https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
>>
>>  Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
>> Mutual Fund Industry
>>
>> Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003
>>
>> Witness Panel 1
>>
>>     Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>>     Director - Division of Enforcement
>>     Securities and Exchange Commission
>>           Cutler - November 20, 2003
>>     Mr. Robert Glauber
>>     Chairman and CEO
>>     National Association of Securities Dealers
>>           Glauber - November 20, 2003
>>     Eliot Spitzer
>>     Attorney General
>>     State of New York
>>           Spitzer - November 20, 2003
>>
>>
>>
>> Yanis Varoufakis
>> @yanisvaroufakis
>> ·
>>
>> Law and Disorder: The case of Julian Assange - DiEM25
>> The conviction of Julian Assange would signify a new dystopian
>> landscape in which all investigative journalism risks prosecution.
>> diem25.org
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> @DavidRaymondAm1
>> ·
>> 1h
>> Perhaps you and I should have a long talk ASAP?
>>
>> FYI this old pdf file is the tip of the iceberg of things that Bolton
>> and Assange have known about yours truly for many years
>>
>> https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> @DavidRaymondAm1
>> ·
>> 41m
>> The first link I offer in the blog Greece is among the many that
>> received hundreds of documents byway of registered US Mail as I
>> returned home to run for public office 6 more times while suing the
>> Queen
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>>
>> Notice Assange and Trumps lawyer's email before they became famous?
>>
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>>
>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
>> first email I ever sent you
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> dear Dave
>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
>> find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime
>>
>> thank you for bearing with me
>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
>> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>>
>> with oceans of joy
>> birgitta
>>
>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>> not.
>>
>> Andre Gide
>>
>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>> http://this.is/birgittahttp://joyb.blogspot.com -
>> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>>
>>>>> From: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>>>
>>>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>> To: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G"Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
>>>>> something
>>>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>>>
>>>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>>
>>>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>>>
>>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>>>> office.
>>>>>
>>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
>>>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>>>
>>>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>>>> waits attendance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
>>>>> Hafnarstræti 15
>>>>> 101 Reykjavík
>>>>> Iceland
>>>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
>>>>> +354-540-3600
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>>
>> Wednesday, 2 August 2017
>>
>> Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting
>> with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the United Nations,
>> This was the pdf file attached to the email found below
>>
>> https://www.scribd.com/document/332928056/UN-DUDES
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "MAY, Theresa"theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk
>> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:24 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32
>> 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador
>> to the United Nations,
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> If your email is to the Prime Minister, please re-send to the No 10
>> website:
>> www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>>
>> http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>>
>>
>> If you are a constituent of the Prime Minister, please re-send to:
>> sharkeyj@parliament.uk
>>
>> UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
>> recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
>> and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
>> copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
>> but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
>> transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
>> encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
>> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
>> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:16 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki
>> Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the
>> United Nations,
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>> comments.
>>
>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>> commentaires.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
>> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
>> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
>> does he lie to me after all this time???
>> To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
>> Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
>> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au
,
>> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
>> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
>> "CNN.Viewer.Communications.
Management" , news-tips , lionel
>> Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
>> elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
>> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
>> oldmaison , andre
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Michael Cohen
>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
>> called and left a message for you
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>> ______________________________
__
>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
>> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
>> electronic signature under applicable law.
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
>>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
>> T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>> comments.
>>
>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>> commentaires.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Kevin Leahy
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
>> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
>> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> French will follow
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
>> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
>> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
>> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>> ------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
>> Merci pour votre courriel.
>>
>> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
>> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
>> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
>>  sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
>> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
>> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
>> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
>> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
>> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> Kevin Leahy
>> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
>> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
>> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
>> T 613-996-5048
>> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
>> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
>> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
>> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
>> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
>> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
>> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
>> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
>> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
>> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
>> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
>> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
>> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
>> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
>> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
>> erreur et supprimez-le.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
>> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______­­
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>>> andre@jafaust.com>
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
>>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:33 +0000
> Subject: RE: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
> I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: David Amos
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000
> Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
> I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: David Amos
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "B English (MIN)"
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:29 +0000
> Subject: Automated response from the office of Hon Bill English
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your email to the Prime Minister.
>
> This is an automated response.
>
> Please be assured that any matters you raise in your email will be
> noted; however, not all messages will receive an individual response.
>
> Yours sincerely
> The Office of the Prime Minister
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: PmInvites
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:50 +0000
> Subject: PM Invites
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your invitation/meeting request to the Prime Minister,
> the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP.
> Your invitation will be considered in light of the Prime Minister's
> existing commitments.
> We will be in touch with you as soon as possible to formally advise
> the progress of your invitation/meeting request.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Prime Minister's Office
>
> ______________________________
________________________________________
>
> IMPORTANT: This message, and any attachments to it, contains information
> that is confidential and may also be the subject of legal professional or
> other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
> must not review, copy, disseminate or disclose its contents to any other
> party or take action in reliance of any material contained within it. If
> you
> have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
> by
> return email informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of the
> message from your computer system.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Turnbull, Malcolm (MP)"
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President
> Donald J. Trump I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen
> (646-853-0114) Why does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: David Amos
>
> ***Please be advised that this email address is no longer in use***
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to me. Feedback from the people
> we represent is always extremely valuable for members of parliament,
> and especially valuable to me as Prime Minister.
>
> However as you can imagine I receive a very large, sometimes
> dauntingly large, amount of correspondence and it is important that we
> do everything we can to respond to it as quickly and effectively as
> possible.
>
> So to help us best direct your enquiry and respond to it, please
> complete this contact form. If you have written a detailed message in
> your email, just cut and paste it into the contact form and complete
> the details requested.
>
> If you would like to invite me or Lucy to an event, please forward the
> invitation to pminvites@pmc.gov.au.
>
> If you are a Wentworth constituent, please make us aware of this and
> my electorate office team in Edgecliff will be in touch.
>
> Regards,
>
> Malcolm Turnbull
> Prime Minister
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
> Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au
,
> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
> "CNN.Viewer.Communications.
Management" , news-tips , lionel
> Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
> elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
> oldmaison , andre
>
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com
, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>
>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>
>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>>> ilian.html
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>>> cards?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>>
>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>>
>>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>>
>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>>
>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>>
>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>>
>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>>
>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>>
>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>>
>>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>>
>>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>>
>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>>
>>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>>
>>>>> Defendant
>>>>>
>>>>> ORDER
>>>>>
>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>>
>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>>>> he stated:
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>>> Police.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>>
>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>> Judge
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>>
>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>>> most
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Merci ,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject:
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>>
>>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>>
>>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>>
>>>>> CM/cb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>>> The Supreme Court
>>>>
>>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>>
>>>> Amos v. Canada
>>>> Court (s) Database
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>> Date
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-30
>>>> Neutral citation
>>>>
>>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>>> File numbers
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>>
>>>> THE COURT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>>
>>>> I.                    Introduction
>>>>
>>>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>>
>>>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>>>
>>>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>>
>>>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>>> c. F-7:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal.
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>>> […]
>>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>>
>>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>>> section.
>>>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>>> that:
>>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>>> appeal book.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias:
>>>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>>
>>>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>>> (4th) 193).
>>>>
>>>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>>> (emphasis added)
>>>>
>>>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>>
>>>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>>
>>>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>>
>>>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>>
>>>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>>> to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> III.               Issue
>>>>
>>>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>>
>>>> IV.              Analysis
>>>>
>>>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>>>
>>>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>>
>>>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>>> interfere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>>
>>>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>>
>>>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>>> (…)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>>> para. 27).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>>
>>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>>
>>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>>
>>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>>
>>>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>>
>>>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>>
>>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>>> of process…
>>>>
>>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>>
>>>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>>
>>>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>>
>>>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>>
>>>> V.                 Conclusion
>>>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>>> without leave to amend.
>>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "David G. Near"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>>> J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>>
>>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>>> DOCKET:
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton,
>>>> New Brunswick
>>>>
>>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> May 24, 2017
>>>>
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>> DATED:
>>>>
>>>> October 30, 2017
>>>>
>>>> APPEARANCES:
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>>
>>>> Jan Jensen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> SIDNEY POWELL
> Sidney Powell, P.C.
> 2911 Turtle Creek Blvd., Suite 300
> Dallas, Texas 75219
> (517) 763-7499
> sidney@federalappeals.com
>
>
>
> HOWARD KLEINHENDLER
> Counsel of Record
> Howard Kleinhendler Esquire
> 369 Lexington Avenue, 12th Floor
> New York, New York 10017
> (917) 793-1188
> howard@kleinhendler.com
>
>
> L. LIN WOOD
> L. LIN WOOD, P.C.
> P.O. Box 52584
> Atlanta, GA 30305-0584
> (404) 891-1402
> lwood@fightback.law
>
> Of Counsel
> JULIA Z. HALLER
> BRANDON JOHNSON
> EMILY P. NEWMAN
>
>
> SIDNEY POWELL
> STEFANIE LAMBERT JUNTTILA
> Attorneys for Plaintiffs/Petitioners
> 500 Griswold Street, Suite 2340
> Detroit, MI 48226
> (248) 270-6689
> attorneystefanielambert@gmail.com
>
> SCOTT R. ELDRIDGE
> Attorney at Law
> Miller, Canfield,
> One Michigan Avenue
> Suite 900
> Lansing, MI 48933-1609
> 517-483-4918
> Email: eldridge@millercanfield.com
>
> DANIEL M. SHARE
> EUGENE DRIKER
> STEPHEN E. GLAZEK
> Attorney at Law
> Barris, Sott, Denn & Driker, PLLC
> 333 West Fort Street; 12th Floor
> Detroit, MI 48226
> 313-965-9725
> Email: dshare@bsdd.com
>
> EZRA D. ROSENBERG
> Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
> 1500 K Street, NW; Suite 900
> Washington, DC 20005
> 202-662-8345
> Email: erosenberg@lawyerscommittee.org
>
> JON GREENBAUM
> Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
> District Of Columbia
> 1500 K Street NW
> Ste 9th Floor
> Washington, DC 20005
> 202-662-8315
> Email: jgreenbaum@lawyerscommittee.org
>
> ERIK A. GRILL
> HEATHER S. MEINGAST
> Michigan Department of Attorney General
> Civil Litigation, Employment & Elections Division
> PO Box 30736
> Lansing, MI 48909
> 517-335-7659
> Email: grille@michigan.gov
>
> DARRYL BRESSACK
> DAVID H. FINK and NATHAN J. FINK
> Attorneys as Law
> 38500 Woodward Avenue; Suite 350
> Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304
> 248-971-2500
> Email: dbressack@finkbressack.com
>
> ANDREW A. PATERSON, JR.
> Attorney at Law
> 46350 Grand River Ave.
> Novi, MI 48374
> 248 568-9712
> Email: aap43@hotmail.com
>
> MARY ELLEN GUREWITZ
> Attorney at Law
> Cummings & Cummings Law PLLC
> 423 North Main Street; Suite 200
> Royal Oak, MI 48067
> 313-204-6979
> Email: megurewitz@gmail.com
>

RCMP accuses 3 of its officers of obstructing justice, destroying evidence

$
0
0

 https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies 

 

Image

Methinks Big Bad Billy Blair the latest  LIEbrano Boss of the RCMP won't call back or write me because he doesn't want me to have further proof of the severve lack of Integrity N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-rcmp-officers-charged-1.5875142

 

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:12:57 -0400
Subject: Fwd: YO Higgy Methinks Big Bad Billy Blair should explain to me                                       real slow why I need permission to send a email to the local mindless boss of                                       the RCMP N'esy Pas?
To: charles.leger@moncton.ca, brian.hicks@moncton.ca, mayor@moncton.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Lucie.Dubois"
<Lucie.Dubois@gnb.ca>, "Shane.Magee"<Shane.Magee@cbc.ca>

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-rcmp-officers-charged-1.5875142

 

Charges against Moncton RCMP officers 'troubling,' board chair says

Three officers face allegations they destroyed evidence during a criminal investigation in May, 2019

 

Shane Magee· CBC News· Posted: Jan 15, 2021 3:27 PM AT |

 


Three Codiac Regional RCMP officers each face a single count of obstructing justice by destroying evidence during a criminal investigation in 2019. (Shane Magee/CBC file)

Obstruction of justice charges against three RCMP officers are "troubling" says the chair of a board overseeing Codiac Regional RCMP.

"Everyone is innocent until proven guilty," Charles Léger told reporters after a Codiac Regional Policing Authority Board meeting Thursday night. 

"It's not something we like to hear, but there's a need to make sure that justice is upheld … Things like this are troubling, but they're being handled in the best and most appropriate way." 

The board oversees the force that polices Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview. Léger was answering questions after its first meeting following the announcement of the charges last week.

Cpl. Mathieu Potvin, 32, Const. Eric Pichette, 39, and Const. Graham Bourque, 32, each face a single count of obstructing justice by destroying evidence during a criminal investigation. The alleged destruction happened May 15, 2019.

Charles Léger, chair of the Codiac Regional Policing Authority board, called the charges troubling, but says the issue is being handled appropriately. (Pierre Fournier/CBC)

An RCMP news release issued Jan. 5 says the alleged crimes happened during a "police operation," but offered no further specifics about what that operation entailed.

The news release about the charges against the officers says they were suspended with pay on Dec. 15 and charges were laid in court Dec. 28.

Court documents show the investigation of the officers was carried out by another RCMP officer in Montreal. 

Why charges were laid a year and seven months after the evidence was allegedly destroyed isn't clear. It's also unclear when the allegations surfaced and began to be investigated, or how long the three officers continued working on other investigations.

Potvin is listed as a media contact in a Feb. 20, 2020 news release about a drug seizure during a traffic stop.

The case against the officers is being handled by Crown prosecutor Claude Haché in Fredericton, Coreen Enos, a spokesperson for the justice department, said in an email.

CBC News asked the department several questions about the charges, including when Crown prosecutors became aware of the case, when the decision was made to lay charges, at what level of the department that decision was made, and whether the alleged destruction of evidence affected prosecution of a case. 

Enos didn't answer, writing that the "questions are intertwined with the investigation and legal issues and, since the matter is now in front of the courts, we are unable to comment any further."


Carley Parish, a Hampton-based criminal defence lawyer, says the officers haven't been convicted but that the charges are disheartening. (Submitted/Lutz Longstaff Parish)

Carley Parish, a Hampton-based criminal defence lawyer, isn't involved in the case and only knows what police have said publicly so far.

While noting they are presumed innocent until proven guilty, she called the charges disheartening.

She said police officers, like lawyers, are held to a higher standard.

"At the end of the day, obstruction of justice, this is a difficult charge. It's not used lightly, but at the same time, it's not a charge that you see regularly," Parish said. 

Parish said given they haven't been convicted, it's too soon to say whether the charges could affect any other cases the officers have been involved with. 

Supt. Tom Critchlow, the commanding officer of Codiac Regional RCMP, offered little new information about the case when asked by a reporter Thursday following the policing authority board meeting. 

 

Codiac Regional RCMP Supt. Tom Critchlow says RCMP members are expected to hold themselves to a high moral and professional standard. (Kate Letterick/CBC News)

"RCMP members are expected to hold themselves to a high moral and professional standard," Critchlow said. 

"Any allegation that a member has not done so is troubling and is taken very seriously." 

Critchlow said the suspension adds to staffing challenges for Codiac.

One quarter of Codiac Regional RCMP shifts did not meet a minimum staff threshold in 2019, resulting in other Mounties being called in to work overtime or shifted to frontline roles from other police units like street crime and the general investigations section.

In response, the 2021 budget authorized adding 13 more officers to counteract staff shortages caused by long-term or injury leaves.

Critchlow told the policing authority that Codiac has filled eight of the 13 positions so far. He said the force has several strategies it will use to fill the holes created by the three officers on leave. 

The officers are scheduled to appear in court on March 15.

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-officers-obstruction-of-justice-1.5862212

 

RCMP accuses 3 of its officers of obstructing justice, destroying evidence

Charges laid in Moncton are related to officers' conduct during a 2019 operation, force says

 

CBC News· Posted: Jan 05, 2021 4:30 PM AT 

 


A New Brunswick RCMP release says the three officers have been suspended with pay since Dec. 15, 2020. (CBC)

The New Brunswick RCMP has charged three of its own officers with obstruction of justice.

A news release by the RCMP says the charges were laid against  Cpl. Mathieu Potvin, Const. Eric Pichette and Const. Graham Bourque in Moncton provincial court on Dec. 28.

According to court documents, the three officers allegedly "wilfully [attempted] to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice, by destroying evidence during a criminal investigation" on May 15, 2019.

The release says the charges are related to the officers' conduct during a 2019 police operation.

The officers are scheduled to appear on March 15, and all three were suspended with pay on Dec. 15.

The RCMP's professional standards unit is conducting a separate investigation under the force's code of conduct.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

https://crpa-aprc.ca/crpa/the-board/


The Board

Board members of the CRPA are appointed by the municipalities of
Dieppe, Moncton and Riverview for a three year renewable term. The
appointments are as follows: two Board Members from the City of
Dieppe, seven Board Members from the City of Moncton, two Board
Members from the Town of Riverview and one Board Member from the
Province of New Brunswick. The CRPA Board members possess a variety of
backgrounds including community, business, accounting, legal, human
resources, law enforcement and public relations experience.
Members:

Charles R. Léger
Chair
Appointed by: Moncton


Vicki L. Squires
Vice Chair
Appointed by: Moncton

Nagesh Jammula
Treasurer
Appointed by: Moncton

Danie Roy
Board Member
Appointed by: Moncton

Irwin Lampert
Board Member
Appointed by: Moncton

James Graves
Board Member
Appointed by: the Province of New Brunswick

John Coughlan
Board Member
Appointed by: Riverview
Robert J. Arsenault
Board Member
Appointed by: Dieppe

Véronique Chadillon-Farinacci
Board Member
Appointed by: Moncton


RCMP Representatives:
Tom Critchlow, Supt.
Officer in Charge, Codiac Regional RCMP

Benoit Jolette, Insp.
Officer in Charge of Operations, Codiac Regional RCMP

Debbie Hathaway
Financial Administrator

Charles Savoie
Strategic Planning and Policing Support Services

Tania Gould
Recording Secretary


https://www.moncton.ca/my-govt-work-city-council/meet-your-city-council

Charles Léger
Councillor, Ward 2
506.871.6746
charles.leger@moncton.ca




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:30:25 -0400
Subject: YO Higgy Methinks Big Bad Billy Blair should explain to me
real slow why I need permission to send a email to the local mindless
boss of the RCMP N'esy Pas?
To: "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barb.whitenect"

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:22:35 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Higgy I read the news today OH Boy
Methinks folks may enoy a little Deja Vu about your buddy Irwin Lampert 
and the RCMP yapping in CBC before the last election N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.

Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
office hours, both over the phone and via email.

Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en

Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.

Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>

Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
as possible.

Best,


MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>

**
Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.

Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
que par courrier ?lectronique.

En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr

En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
courrier ?lectronique.

Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus

Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.

Cordialement,

Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
< mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: postmaster@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 12:22:53 -0500
Subject: Undeliverable: YO Higgy I read the news today OH Boy Methinks
folks may enoy a little Deja Vu about your buddy Irwin Lampert and the
RCMP yapping in CBC before the last election N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

Larry.Tremblay (Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca)<mailto:Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Your message couldn't be delivered because you don't have permission
to send to the recipient's system. Ask the recipient's email admin to
grant you permission and then try again.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:22:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:26:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO Higgy I read the news today OH Boy
Methinks folks may enoy a little Deja Vu about your buddy Irwin Lampert 
and the RCMP yapping in CBC before the last election N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Payette is the one resigning — but Justin Trudeau has to wear it

$
0
0

https://www.gg.ca/en/media/news/2021/statement-governor-general 

Statement from the Governor General

January 21, 2021

OTTAWA—Everyone has a right to a healthy and safe work environment, at all times and under all circumstances. It appears this was not always the case at the Office of the Secretary to the Governor General. Tensions have arisen at Rideau Hall over the past few months and for that, I am sorry.

While no formal complaints or official grievances were made during my tenure, which would have immediately triggered a detailed investigation as prescribed by law and the collective agreements in place, I still take these allegations very seriously. Not only did I welcome a review of the work climate at the OSGG, but I have repeatedly encouraged employees to participate in the review in large numbers. We all experience things differently, but we should always strive to do better, and be attentive to one another’s perceptions.

I am a strong believer in the principles of natural justice, due process and the rule of law, and that these principles apply to all equally. Notwithstanding, in respect for the integrity of my vice-regal Office and for the good of our country and of our democratic institutions, I have come to the conclusion that a new Governor General should be appointed. Canadians deserve stability in these uncertain times.

From a personal side, this decision comes at an opportune time, as my father’s health has seriously worsened in the last few weeks and my family needs my help.

So it is with sureness and humility, but also with pride over what was accomplished during my tenure as Governor General and in my service to the country for the past 28 years, that I have submitted my resignation. I have informed the Prime Minister of Canada of my decision. I wish him the best as he seeks an individual to recommend to Her Majesty as the next Governor General of Canada and I wish the best to my successor. I will remain at his or her disposal.

It has been an immense privilege to serve my country and to fulfill the constitutional duties of my Office on behalf of all Canadians. I wish to extend my thanks to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau for his trust and for offering me this incredible opportunity. I would also like to thank the personnel of the Office of the Secretary to the Governor General for their work, especially under the difficult circumstances that we have known over the past months. All my gratitude also goes to the members of the RCMP who are willing to put their lives on the line to assure our protection; and to the members of the Canadian Armed Forces who have always shown tremendous respect, friendship and support. Being their Commander in chief for the last few year has been a tremendous honour. I hold them in great esteem.

For so many Canadians, the past few months have been extremely difficult. As our country, and indeed the world, faced the reality of a pandemic, we all have had to make sacrifice and do our part to limit the spread of the virus, and to protect others, especially the most vulnerable. One cannot choose when hardship comes, but one can choose how to respond to it in times of crisis, and Canadians all over the country have answered the call. At the forefront are the health and medical personnel, essential workers, military personnel, public health officials, leaders and scientists, who have been working tirelessly to provide care, support, leadership and solutions. We owe them an immense debt of gratitude.

I would like to conclude by conveying my sincere appreciation to Canadians for their support over the years. I have had the chance to meet, represent and celebrate the accomplishments of thousands of extraordinary Canadians from coast to coast over the past years and I will always cherish these memories. We live in a remarkable country.

It has been an honour and a privilege.

Julie Payette

-30-

Media information:

Rob McKinnon
Rideau Hall Press Office
343-548-1976 (cell)
Rob.McKinnon@gg.ca


https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies



@amandacconn
The probe of Gov. Gen. Julie Payette’s treatment of staff is in. The results are ‘scathing:’ sources
 
Replying to @amandacconn
Methinks Gobal et al should review my Statement of Claim Paragraph 8 in particular N'esy Pas?
 
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:23:18 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I just contacted the Governor General and
Canada's latest Lieutenant Governor through their offices in Ottawa
and Fredericton .byway of phone and obviously email as well N'esy Pas
Mr Butts?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
understanding.

If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
(506) 453-2144.

Thank you.


Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
veuillez visiter
www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

Merci.


Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
P.O Box/C. P. 6000
Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-
Brunswick
E3B 5H1
Canada
Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
Email/Courriel:
premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:22:12 +0000
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Info <Info@gg.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 14:22:15 +0000
Subject: OSGG General Inquiries / Demande de renseignements généraux au BSGG
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor
General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses
to specific inquiries can be expected within three weeks. Please note
that general comments and opinions may not receive a response.

*****

Nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit au Bureau du secrétaire du
gouverneur général. Nous aimons prendre connaissance de vos points de
vue et de vos suggestions. Il faut allouer trois semaines pour
recevoir une réponse à une demande précise. Veuillez noter que nous ne
donnons pas nécessairement suite aux opinions et aux commentaires
généraux.


IMPORTANT NOTICE: This message may contain confidential or privileged
information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are
not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or
copy this email. Please notify the sender immediately if you have
received this email by mistake and delete it from your system.

AVIS IMPORTANT : Le présent courriel peut contenir des renseignements
confidentiels et est strictement réservé à l’usage de la personne à
qui il est destiné. Si vous n’êtes pas la personne visée, vous ne
devez pas diffuser, distribuer ou copier ce courriel. Merci de nous en
aviser immédiatement et de supprimer ce courriel s’il vous a été
envoyé par erreur.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 10:22:09 -0400
Subject: Fwd: I just contacted the Governor General and Canada's
latest Lieutenant Governor through their offices in Ottawa and
Fredericton .byway of phone and obviously email as well N'esy Pas 
Mr Butts?
To: Rob.McKinnon@gg.ca, SylviaPoirier <SylviaPoirier@conservative.ca>,
pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
"Ian.Shugart"<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, ltgov@gnb.ca, info@gg.ca
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
robmoorefundy@gmail.com

Rob McKinnon
Rideau Hall Press Office
343-548-1976 (cell)
Rob.McKinnon@gg.ca

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 10:42:31 -0300
Subject: Re: I just contacted the Governor General and Canada's latest
Lieutenant Governor through their offices in Ottawa and Fredericton
.byway of phone and obviously email as well N'esy Pas Mr Butts?
To: info@gg.ca, ltgov@gnb.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"Kevin.Vickers"<Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"
<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "ian.hanamansing"<ian.hanamansing@cbc.ca>,
"Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>,
"Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Alex.Johnston"
<Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
<megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>,
"rick.desaulniers"<rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca>, "robert.gauvin"
<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, robmoorefundy <robmoorefundy@gmail.com>,
alaina <alaina@alainalockhart.ca>, "robert.mckee"
<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>, "andrea.anderson-mason"
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>,
"Roger.Brown"<Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "dan. bussieres"
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Cote"<Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>,
kathleen.roussel@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca
Cc: "Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "David.Lametti"<David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>,
"Ian.Shugart"<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Info <Info@gg.ca>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 13:36:23 +0000
Subject: OSGG General Inquiries / Demande de renseignements généraux au BSGG
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Office of the Secretary to the Governor
General. We appreciate hearing your views and suggestions. Responses
to specific inquiries can be expected within three weeks. Please note
that general comments and opinions may not receive a response.

*****

Nous vous remercions d'avoir écrit au Bureau du secrétaire du
gouverneur général. Nous aimons prendre connaissance de vos points de
vue et de vos suggestions. Il faut allouer trois semaines pour
recevoir une réponse à une demande précise. Veuillez noter que nous ne
donnons pas nécessairement suite aux opinions et aux commentaires
généraux.



On 10/9/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
> Office of the Secretary to the Governor General
>     Rideau Hall
>     1 Sussex Drive
>     Ottawa ON K1A 0A1
>     613-993-8200
>     1-800-465-6890 (toll-free in Canada and the U.S.)
>     TTY: 1-800-465-7735
>     info@gg.ca
>
> I spoke to a lady named "Hannah"
>
> Lieutenant Governor .
> Phone: (506) 453-2505
> Fax: (506) 444-5280
> E-mail: ltgov@gnb.ca
> Or by regular mail (see below)
>
> I got the recording so I left another voicemail
>
> This is the lawsuit I was referring to
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
> Friday, 18 September 2015
> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>
>
>
>                       Court File No. T-1557-15
>
> FEDERAL COURT
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
>                            Plaintiff
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
>                            Defendant
>
> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
>
> The Parties
>
> 1.      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
> England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
> longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
> wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
> because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
> of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
> on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
> within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
> United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
> follows:
>
>      “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
> Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
> on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
> House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
> Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
> Commons.”
>
>      “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
> Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
> federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
> advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
> legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
> Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
> elected for a period of five years.”
>
> 2.      Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
> sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
> of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
> action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
> Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
> Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
> Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
> providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
> legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
> provincial and municipal properties.
>
> 3.      Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
> serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
> parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
> not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
> appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
> oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
> the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
> to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:
>
>   “Mr. David R. Amos
>             Jan 3rd, 2004
> 153Alvin Avenue
>    Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186
>
>                 Dear Mr. Amos
>
>       Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
>                 my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
> your safety.
>                 I apologize for the delay in responding.
>
>       If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
>                suggest that you contact the police of local
> jurisdiction. In addition, any
>                evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
> their attention since the
>                police are in the best position to evaluate the
> information and take action
>                as deemed appropriate.
>
>        I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
>                                                               Yours
> sincerely
>
>  A. Anne McLellan”
>
> 4.      DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the
> first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick
> (NB) on July 17th, 1952.
>
> 5.      The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen
> whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
> performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are
> either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose
> mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and
> to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to
> seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the
> Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13
> explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and
> paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.
>
> 6.      The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights
> found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections
> of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of
> Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the
> legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.
>
> 7.      The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a
> Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of
> Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the
> election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament.
>
> 8.      The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he
> made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media
> including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting
> Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to
> Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of
> 2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was
> dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of
> the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
> knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of
> the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the
> Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten
> years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor
> General’s letter is as follows:
>
>
>   “September 11th, 2004
>           Dear Mr. Amos,
>
>            On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
> Clarkson,
>            I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
> regarding corruption,
>            one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
> us by the Office of
>            the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.
>
>                        I regret to inform you that the Governor
> General cannot intervene in
>            matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
> and courts of Justice of
>            Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
> authorities regarding
>            your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.
>
>                                                   Yours sincerely.
>                                                               Renee
> Blanchet
>                                                               Office
> of the Secretary
>                                                               to the
> Governor General”
>
> 9.      The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
> Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
> Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his
> assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor
> General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint
> and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but
> ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor
> General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor
> General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of
> Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003
> and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
> Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that
> there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into
> Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is
> a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office
> Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with
> his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking
> to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US
> Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
> York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a
> public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about
> investigations of the mutual fund industry.
>
> Here is a comment I made in CBC before I called their offices
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/brenda-murphy-lieutenant-governor-new-brunswick-installed-1.5313102
>
> 6 Comments
>
> David Raymond Amos
> Methinks whereas Murphy spoke about her passion for social justice,
> the lady and I should have a long talk very soon about the lawsuit I
> filed in Federal Court in 2015 while I was running in the last federal
> election N'esy Pas?
>
>
>
>
> Brenda Murphy installed as New Brunswick's 32nd lieutenant-governor
>
>
> Formal ceremony held in Fredericton on Tuesday follows swearing-in last
> month
> CBC News · Posted: Oct 08, 2019 5:40 PM AT | Last Updated: October 8
> Lt.-Gov. Brenda Murphy's installation ceremony included an honour
> guard. (Ed Hunter/CBC)
>
>
> Brenda Murphy was installed as New Brunswick's 32nd
> lieutenant-governor during a formal ceremony Tuesday at the
> legislative assembly in Fredericton.
>
> In her first speech as lieutenant-governor, Murphy spoke about her
> passion for social justice.
>
> "Effective change can happen when we work together to build an
> inclusive, equitable society, address systemic barriers and support
> one another," she said.
>
> "Having experienced New Brunswick through several different lenses, I
> am looking forward to bringing that diverse perspective to this role
> and to continuing to serve the people of our province."
>
> Murphy, 60, of Grand Bay-Westfield, succeeds Jocelyne Roy Vienneau,
> 63, who died Aug. 2 following a battle with cancer.
>
> Murphy was sworn in during an informal ceremony on Sept. 8 to allow
> for the immediate commencement of her duties.
>
>     Brenda Murphy 'humbled' to be appointed New Brunswick's new
> lieutenant-governor
>
> Premier Blaine Higgs, who hosted Tuesday's official ceremony, thanked
> Murphy for her leadership in social justice and making "a profound
> difference in the lives of many New Brunswickers."
>
> "I know she will continue to inspire others and contribute to the
> betterment of our province as lieutenant-governor, and I look forward
> to working with her."
>
> Murphy spent more than two decades as the head of the Saint John
> Women's Empowerment Network before retiring in April and has served on
> advisory councils on poverty and the status of women at the federal
> and provincial levels.
>
> She served three terms as a town councillor in Grand Bay-Westfield and
> has volunteered with a variety of organizations over the years,
> supporting housing, justice and equality for women.
>
> Lieutenant-governors are appointed by Julie Payette, the Governor
> General of Canada, on the recommendation of the prime minister. They
> serve terms of at least five years.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
 
 
 

Independent firm completes review into claims of 'toxic' environment at Rideau Hall

Sources briefed on the report say it's scathing

 
Ashley Burke· CBC News· Posted: Jan 21, 2021 11:00 AM ET


 

Gov. Gen. Julie Payette. An outside consultant hired to look into reports of a toxic workplace at Rideau Hall has tabled a report that sources say comes to some harsh conclusions. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

An independent consulting firm has completed its review into reports of a toxic environment and workplace harassment at Rideau Hall — and sources briefed on the report say its tone is blistering.

Sources said the negative findings in the report could make it difficult for Julie Payette to remain in her role as Governor General. The Globe and Mail also reports that the review has been completed and is damning in its conclusions.

Sources have also told CBC that Secretary to the Governor General Assunta Di Lorenzo, who has also been accused of harassing employees, recently hired Marie Henein's firm to represent her.

Henein represented ex-Vice Admiral Mark Norman, the military's former second-in-command, during his trial for breach of trust. Federal prosecutors stayed that charge. It's not clear if Henein or another lawyer at her firm is personally representing Di Lorenzo.

CBC News contacted Rideau Hall, Di Lorenzo and Henein this morning for comment and has not heard back. The National Post has also reported Henein Hutchison LLP has been hired. 

CBC is not naming the sources as they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The head of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada, Dominic LeBlanc, is overseeing the review and is expected to offer recommendations to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on his response. LeBlanc's father was the governor general from 1995-1999. 

Experts agree that when a government wants a controversial governor general to depart, the most likely approach would be for the prime minister to suggest resignation. If the governor general doesn't follow through on that suggestion, the prime minister could turn to the Queen to appoint a replacement.

A spokesperson for Buckingham Palace wouldn't comment on the report today.

"This is a matter for the Canadian government so I would refer you to them," said Hannah Howard, deputy communications secretary to the Queen.

The Privy Council Office launched the unprecedented third-party review in July in response to a CBC News report featuring a dozen public servants and former employees confidentially claiming Payette had belittled, berated and publicly humiliated Rideau Hall staff. Di Lorenzo, the Governor General's longtime friend and second-in-command, is also accused of bullying staff.

Payette tweeted two days after that story aired that she was "deeply concerned about the media reports" and she "takes harassment and workplace issues very seriously ... I am in full agreement and welcome the independent review."

As of Jan. 5, Rideau Hall had spent more than $150,000 in public funds on legal representation in response to the toxic workplace allegations, including a former Supreme Court justice for the Governor General and Blakes law firm for the institution.

That sum is larger than the original value of the federal contract that hired Quintet Consulting to conduct the review. The private firm was hired on an $88,325 contract in Sept. 2020.

More than 50 people voluntarily took part in the review. They included current and former staff at Rideau Hall and representatives of other government departments that work closely with the Governor General and her office, such as the RCMP, Global Affairs and the National Capital Commission. 

The number of participants grew higher than the government anticipated, causing the review to take longer than originally scheduled. 

Quintet's president, Raphael Szajnfarber, told CBC News yesterday the firm remains "unable to discuss this confidential matter."

WATCH | The atmosphere at Rideau Hall was tense in November 2020 as review was underway:

The atmosphere at Rideau Hall is tense as an investigation into allegations of workplace harassment continues with more than 50 people being interviewed. The investigation follows claims that Gov. Gen. Julie Payette harassed employees and her second-in-command bullied staff. 1:51

Reports of 'tantrums' on foreign trips

Last year, former staffers gave CBC News accounts of Payette throwing "tantrums" in the office and on foreign trips, openly criticizing people's work to the point where they were reduced to tears, and tossing an employee's work aside and calling it "shit." Employees have been seen leaving her office with tears in their eyes or crying in their vehicles. 

Sources say Payette is known for dropping "explosions" or "bursts of emotion" on staff at Rideau Hall over the quality of work done in the office.

CBC News has now spoken confidentially to more than 20 public servants with direct knowledge of the workplace climate at Rideau Hall. They spoke on the condition they not be named because they feared they could lose their jobs or their careers could suffer. Many of the sources are still in the public service, while others are former Rideau Hall employees.

One source said Rideau Hall went from being one of the most collegial federal public service workplaces to a "house of horrors," causing longtime employees to leave in droves.

Payette greets Canadian World War II veteran Bill Anderson, left, at a ceremony at the Beny-sur-Mer Canadian War Cemetery in Reviers, Normandy, France, in June 2019. Some former employees reported that on some foreign trips Payette threw 'tantrums' and was verbally abusive to staff. (David Vincent/The Associated Press)

Five executives left Payette's office in 2018 within months of each other, the communications department cleared out during the pandemic and Di Lorenzo has had at least four executive assistants leave, according to sources. In the past month, another group of staff members departed.

"She screams and humiliates staff in front of others," one former employee told CBC News in July 2020. "It's verbal abuse. In no world is it OK to treat people that way."

At the beginning of her mandate, sources said, Payette also put staff on the spot by quizzing them about outer space — asking them to name all the planets in the solar system, for example, or to state the distance between the sun and the moon.

In one four-month period, roughly two dozen people reported abusive conduct by Payette or Di Lorenzo to management, according to government sources. Former employees complain the system protects the alleged abusers and said they fear it would ruin their careers to file an official complaint.

Claims of harassment of employees

Di Lorenzo is also accused of harassing employees and calling some "lazy" and "incompetent."

A former lawyer and executive in Montreal, Di Lorenzo is supposed to keep Payette's office running smoothly and effectively. Multiple sources said Di Lorenzo is years into the job — which is typically filled by a seasoned public servant — and still doesn't understand how the public service works.

"[Di Lorenzo is] also a bully," said a source. "When confronted with something she's unsure of, instead of giving you the benefit of the doubt, she comes at you as a pit bull."

CBC News has also reported Payette has faced similar claims at past workplaces, but the prime minister and his officials didn't conduct checks with her past employers before appointing her as Governor General.

Payette was given severance of roughly $200,000 when she resigned from the Montreal Science Centre in 2016 following complaints about her treatment of employees, say multiple sources at Canada Lands Company, the Crown corporation that employed her. In 2017, Payette left the Canadian Olympic Committee after two internal investigations into her treatment of staff that included claims of verbal harassment, sources with that organization said.

The Governor General retained the services of former Supreme Court of Canada justice Michel Bastarache as "constitutional adviser" and paid him $41,488. The law firm Blakes is also assisting the Office of the Secretary to the Governor General (OSGG) in the review process and has been paid $111,179; that contract has been amended to allow for billing up to $149,500.

In August, Rideau Hall hired former NDP national director Karl Bélanger and his firm, Traxxion Strategies, to provide strategic communications counsel and media relations support to Payette, and has paid him $9,450 so far.

About the Author

Ashley Burke

Reporter

Ashley Burke is a senior reporter with CBC's Parliamentary Bureau. Have a story idea? Email her at ashley.burke@cbc.ca

With files from the CBC's Kristen Everson

 

 

 

 

 

 
Need I say that Leblanc's Bullshit made my day???
 
 
 
 

Payette stepping down as governor general after blistering report on Rideau Hall work environment

Chief Justice Richard Wagner will be fulfilling duties of the Governor General

 
Ashley Burke, Kristen Everson· CBC News· Posted: Jan 21, 2021 3:35 PM ET 
 
 
 
Governor General Julie Payette arrives at a swearing in ceremony in Ottawa, Ont., on August 18, 2020. (Patrick Doyle/Reuters)
 

Gov.-Gen. Julie Payette and her secretary, Assunta di Lorenzo, are resigning after an outside workplace review of Rideau Hall found that the pair presided over a toxic work environment.

Last year, an independent consulting firm was hired by the Privy Council Office (PCO) to review reports that Payette was responsible for workplace harassment at Rideau Hall.

Sources who were briefed on the consulting firm's report told CBC News that its conclusions were damning.

President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada Dominic LeBlanc told CBC's Vassy Kapelos the federal government received the final report late last week, which he said offered some "disturbing" and "worrisome" conclusions.

LeBlanc said Payette indicated her intention to resign during a meeting with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau last night, where they discussed the report's contents.

In a media statement announcing her departure, Payette apologized for what she called the "tensions" at Rideau Hall in recent months, saying that everyone has "a right to a healthy and safe work environment."

"While no formal complaints or official grievances were made during my tenure, which would have immediately triggered a detailed investigation as prescribed by law and the collective agreements in place, I still take these allegations very seriously," she said in the statement. 

"We all experience things differently, but we should always strive to do better and be attentive to one another's perceptions."

WATCH | Gov. Gen. Julie Payette resigns after scathing workplace review:

Gov. Gen. Julie Payette resigned on Thursday after a scathing review about a toxic workplace at Rideau Hall. The review followed CBC reporting into allegations of workplace harassment and bullying in the Governor General’s office. 2:50

Payette said her resignation comes at a good time because her father is in poor health and her family needs her help. 

Trudeau's office confirmed receiving Payette's resignation.

"Every employee in the Government of Canada has the right to work in a safe and healthy environment, and we will always take this very seriously," Trudeau said in a statement. "Today's announcement provides an opportunity for new leadership at Rideau Hall to address the workplace concerns raised by employees during the review."

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada Richard Wagner will fulfil the duties of the Governor General on an interim basis. In a short statement, Buckingham Palace said "the Queen has been kept informed of developments."

Third-party review

The Privy Council Office launched the unprecedented third-party review in July in response to a CBC News report featuring a dozen public servants and former employees confidentially claiming Payette belittled, berated and publicly humiliated Rideau Hall staff. Di Lorenzo, Payette's longtime friend and second-in-command, is also accused of bullying staff.

Payette tweeted two days after that story aired that she was "deeply concerned about the media reports" and she "takes harassment and workplace issues very seriously ... I am in full agreement and welcome the independent review."

As of Jan. 5, Rideau Hall had spent more than $150,000 in public funds on legal representation in response to the toxic workplace allegations, and had hired a former Supreme Court justice to represent Payette and Blakes law firm for the institution itself.

That sum is larger than the original value of the federal contract that hired Quintet Consulting to conduct the review. The private firm was hired on an $88,325 contract in Sept. 2020.

Sources have also told CBC that Secretary to the Governor General Assunta Di Lorenzo, who has also been accused of harassing employees, recently hired Marie Henein's firm to represent her.

Henein represented ex-Vice Admiral Mark Norman, the military's former second-in-command, during his trial for breach of trust. Federal prosecutors stayed that charge. It's not clear if Henein or another lawyer at her firm is personally representing Di Lorenzo.

The Bloc Québécois issued a statement calling for the immediate release of the Rideau Hall workplace review and said the position of Governor General has no place in a democracy.

LeBlanc said his department has already received — and will comply with — access to information requests for the report. But he added that federal privacy law limits what can be disclosed.

 "The government is not in a position ... to necessarily release all the details of the report," LeBlanc said. "We will clearly comply with the access to information legislation and the appropriate version will be made public as soon as we can."

Removing a Governor General

Payette joins a very short list of governors general who have left the post early — but she is the first to do so mired in controversy.

Lord Alexander left for England a month before Vincent Massey was sworn in as his replacement in 1952. John Buchan, also known as Lord Tweedsmuir, and Georges Vanier both died while serving, in 1940 and 1967, respectively. In those cases, the Supreme Court chief justice of the day stepped in to fill the role temporarily.

Romeo LeBlanc, Dominic's father, stepped down in 1999 before the end of his term due to health issues. The office was not left vacant; LeBlanc continued until Adrienne Clarkson was ready to succeed him.

Governors general have resigned under pressure — and have been asked to resign by prime ministers — in Commonwealth countries in the past. In 2003, Australian Gov. Gen. Peter Hollingworth resigned after controversy erupted over the way he had handled sexual abuse claims while he was archbishop of Brisbane.

WATCH | Former heritage minister on choosing a governor general

James Moore was the heritage minister in the Conservative government of Stephen Harper. 1:48

Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole released a statement calling on the Liberal government to consult the other parties before choosing Payette's permanent replacement.

"The Governor General is the Commander in Chief of our Armed Forces and has an important constitutional role," O'Toole said. "Considering the problems with his last appointment and the minority Parliament, the Prime Minister should consult opposition parties and re-establish the Vice-Regal Appointments Committee."

That committee was created by the Harper government in 2012 to identify a list of possible candidates for viceregal offices, including the Governor General, through a non-partisan consultation process. It was later disbanded and was dormant in 2017.

LeBlanc committed the Liberal government to a "robust and thorough and complete" vetting process when choosing Payette's successor.

In a statement, Robert Finch, chairman of the Monarchist League of Canada, called media reports about Payette's behaviour "regrettable." He said he hopes that her resignation will usher in a new chapter at Rideau Hall defined by "loyalty, dignity and respect."

"It is important to remember that the Governor General represents our admired head of state, the Queen," said Finch. "If future vice-regals aspire to perform their roles with the grace, dedication and duty as our Sovereign has during almost 70 years, they will excel."

With files from the CBC's Mark Gollom, Peter Zimonjic, Ryan Jones and the Canadian Press

 

 

 

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/payette-governor-general-resignation-wherry-1.5883082

 

Payette is the one resigning — but Justin Trudeau has to wear it

In Payette's appointment, we can see the consequences of a PM leaping before looking

 

Aaron Wherry· CBC News· Posted: Jan 22, 2021 4:00 AM ET

 


Julie Payette leaves along with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau after delivering the throne speech in the Senate chamber in Ottawa on Sept. 23, 2020. Payette resigned her post as governor general on Thursday. She may be the first governor general to have to resign in scandal, but Prime Minister Justin Trudeau does not come away from the scandal unscathed. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

Julie Payette might still want to debate the details of what exactly occurred inside Rideau Hall over the last three and a half years. But she apparently couldn't escape an increasingly obvious conclusion — that for her to continue as governor general would risk inflicting serious damage on the office.

"I am a strong believer in the principles of natural justice, due process and the rule of law, and that these principles apply to all equally," Payette said in a statement released Thursday.

"Notwithstanding, in respect for the integrity of my vice-regal office and for the good of our country and of our democratic institutions, I have come to the conclusion that a new governor general should be appointed."

Payette can now plead her case as a private citizen if she chooses. And if the next person to fill the role manages to do so with little to no trouble, the injuries to the office should be limited.

Payette will go down as the first governor general to have to resign in scandal, but Prime Minister Justin Trudeau does not come away unscathed.

It's the office that counts

The office of governor general is bigger than the person who temporarily occupies it. However interesting or noteworthy the appointee might be, he or she does not come to it with a popular mandate — it's the office that matters. Each governor general might hope to leave a mark, but it's the office that sits at the centre of Canada's democratic system. That imposes a special duty of care on the occupant.

Payette's time as governor general was threatening to tarnish that office. Other governors general have landed in controversy and maybe no one gets through their time at Rideau Hall without experiencing some criticism — either for being too interesting or not interesting enough.

But the allegations against Payette concerned both her interest in attending to some aspects of the job and her treatment of others, specifically her own staff. Those claims by staff members about a "toxic" environment at Rideau Hall were quite serious, and reports suggest an independent review of the office confirmed at least the gist of those charges.

As one commentator noted on Thursday, treating people badly in the workplace might not have been enough to get someone dismissed from a job in years past. But tolerance for misuse of authority is now greatly diminished. And for the nominal head of state, it was too much to overcome.

The GG is a figurehead — but an important one

It is very easy to discount or disregard the governor general. In many ways, the job is about attracting as little attention as possible.

The governor general is, on most days, a figurehead — the representative of Queen Elizabeth II and the embodiment of the Crown. The governor general should represent and celebrate the best of the country while carefully remaining apolitical.

Since the governor general is widely seen as someone who hands out awards and reads the throne speech, it's tempting to imagine that the office could easily be done away with.

But the Crown is central to the Canadian system of government. It's the governor general who presides over transfers of power, imposes some implicit restraint on the prime minister and, in rare circumstances, settles disputes over who will be given the opportunity to govern.

The office could not be reformed or eliminated without significant ramifications for the rest of the system — a system that has, for the most part, served Canada well.

How thoroughly was Payette vetted?

So it's not something to trifle with. And when serious accusations are levelled against the office's occupant, the integrity of the office has to be considered. Payette put that office at risk with her behaviour, and whoever takes the job next will do so at a uniquely delicate moment.

But the end of Payette's time at Rideau Hall leads back to questions about how it started. Doubts about how well she was vetted — about whether gaps in the process led to the appointment of an individual who was unsuited to the task — have already been raised. Such questions will get fresh attention now.

WATCH: Dominic LeBlanc on Julie Payette's resignation

Privy Council President and Intergovernmental Affairs Minister Dominic LeBlanc on the resignation of Governor General Julie Payette. 2:48

Were warning signs missed or discounted? Did the prime minister know enough about who he was appointing? Did Payette know enough about what she was being asked to do?

Payette's appointment might now seem like an artifact of the version of Justin Trudeau that existed between 2013 and 2019 — and that may still live on beneath the more workman-like version that was largely (but not entirely) on display through 2020.

The pre-beard Trudeau was more ostentatious. Sometimes he took a leap and managed to get to the other side — kick-starting Senate reform, legalizing marijuana or resettling 25,000 Syrian refugees. Other times, he failed to look before leaping and ended up taking a nasty fall — as he did with electoral reform.

Julie Payette was very much the sort of governor general you would have imagined Trudeau picking. Stephen Harper chose a bookish, grandfatherly university administrator. Justin Trudeau picked an astronaut who can sing and play the piano. It's easy to imagine Trudeau thinking about how great Payette would be if it all worked out. But it never really did.

Unfortunately for Trudeau, it will now be noted that Harper appointed a panel to come up with potential nominees — and that Trudeau didn't do the same. Maybe that wouldn't have kept Trudeau from picking someone better. But no one can claim it would have resulted in him picking someone worse.

The new governor general might be fine and the public might go back to not thinking much about who occupies Rideau Hall or what they do. More stories will emerge from Rideau Hall, no doubt, and perhaps Payette will attempt to clear her image with an interview or two. In time, though, this might go down as an unfortunate footnote.

But Payette, Trudeau and the office of the governor general will be lucky if that's as far as the fallout goes. For 153 years, Canadian governors general managed to serve without having to resign in scandal. Breaking that streak might not be the end of Canada's constitutional order — but it's no small thing.

About the Author

Aaron Wherry

Parliament Hill Bureau

Aaron Wherry has covered Parliament Hill since 2007 and has written for Maclean's, the National Post and the Globe and Mail. He is the author of Promise & Peril, a book about Justin Trudeau's years in power.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top Moncton Mountie questioned on force's approach to anti-mask protests

$
0
0

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-police-rcmp-covid-mask-protests-1.5874276

 

Top Moncton Mountie questioned on force's approach to anti-mask protests

Codiac Regional RCMP say officers observe, take 'measured' approach focusing on education

 

Shane Magee· CBC News· Posted: Jan 15, 2021 7:49 AM AT

 


Codiac Regional RCMP Supt. Tom Critchlow, shown in a file photo, says the force is taking a measured approach that focuses more on education but may issue tickets depending on the circumstances. (Shane Magee/CBC)

The top RCMP officer in the Moncton region was again questioned about why the force isn't ticketing anti-mask demonstrators apparently defying provincial emergency measures meant to limit the spread of COVID-19. 

Irwin Lampert, a retired provincial court judge who sits on the Codiac Regional Policing Authority board, questioned the RCMP's approach to anti-mask rallies that have occurred in Moncton as recently as Sunday.

"If you heard the premier and the chief medical health officer [Thursday], they were almost begging for people to co-operate and wear masks to social distance and follow the rules," Lampert said during a policing authority board meeting Thursday evening. 

"And here we have a group of maybe 20 to 40 people in front of City Hall making fun of the whole idea." 

Under the orange recovery phase in effect provincewide, outdoor gatherings are limited to 25 people and masks are required outside when physical distancing can't be maintained. 

Codiac Regional Policing Authority board member Irwin Lampert questioned why police were standing by watching what he said was a protest making fun of rules meant to limit the spread of COVID-19. (Kate Letterick/CBC News)

He said businesses are being fined and closed for not following the rules, but RCMP officers are only watching the protests. 

"I don't know why, at the very least, they're not being ticketed," Lampert said. "I don't think they should be able to stand there and make fun of the whole thing when people in the province are getting sick and dying."

Codiac Regional RCMP Supt. Tom Critchlow, the commanding officer of the detachment policing Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview, said officers observed the protest and have tried to educate protestors. 

"It's a measured approach, trying to look at the bigger picture, ensuring that everybody's safety is first and foremost," Critchlow told the board that oversees Codiac RCMP. 

He said ticketing isn't always the best method. 

"I'm not saying that we won't. It's done on a case-by-case situation."

Public Health reported 23 new cases in New Brunswick on Thursday. There have been 12 deaths, and three patients are currently hospitalized.

Premier Blaine Higgs said at an afternoon news conference that the majority of New Brunswickers are following the rules, but "we still don't see the compliance we need to." 

The premier warned that moving back to the red level "is indeed a possibility" if that doesn't change.

"That's why the enforcement is going to ramp up and we're going to become a whole lot more serious about people that are not following the rules," Higgs told CBC's Power and Politics on Thursday.

 

"We're going to become a whole lot more serious about people that are not following the rules." New Brunswick @premierbhiggs says his province is at a critical point in the pandemic. It currently has 246 active cases - the highest number of cases to date. #cdnpoli

Critchlow said police need to respect protesters' rights but will ticket if necessary. 

He said several of those who attended Sunday's protest have been ticketed in other circumstances for violations of the province's emergency measures order. 

Critchlow wasn't able to offer more specific details Thursday evening.

RCMP in New Brunswick have previously declined to tell CBC how many tickets the force has issued in the province for COVID-19 violations. 

About the Author

Shane Magee

Reporter

Shane Magee is a Moncton-based reporter for CBC.

 

86 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

 


Dave Shimla
why cant we comment on this?
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-rcmp-officers-charged-1.5875142

RCMP destroying evidence... who is getting charged? shouldn't Lampert be slightly concerned?
 
 
Dave Shimla
Reply to @Dave Shimla: or this? lots of masks not being worn either in the pictures, all within six feet of each other.,.. or is it different for different causes..

. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/march-peaceful-black-lives-matter-anti-racism-moncton-1.5593486
 
 
Randy McNally
Reply to @Dave Shimla: all I know is you must have connections because if I did this it would be disabled Lol!

 

 https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/rcmp-officers-obstruction-of-justice-1.5862212

 

RCMP accuses 3 of its officers of obstructing justice, destroying evidence

Charges laid in Moncton are related to officers' conduct during a 2019 operation, force says

 

CBC News· Posted: Jan 05, 2021 4:30 PM AT 

 


A New Brunswick RCMP release says the three officers have been suspended with pay since Dec. 15, 2020. (CBC)

The New Brunswick RCMP has charged three of its own officers with obstruction of justice.

A news release by the RCMP says the charges were laid against  Cpl. Mathieu Potvin, Const. Eric Pichette and Const. Graham Bourque in Moncton provincial court on Dec. 28.

According to court documents, the three officers allegedly "wilfully [attempted] to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice, by destroying evidence during a criminal investigation" on May 15, 2019.

The release says the charges are related to the officers' conduct during a 2019 police operation.

The officers are scheduled to appear on March 15, and all three were suspended with pay on Dec. 15.

The RCMP's professional standards unit is conducting a separate investigation under the force's code of conduct.

 

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-rcmp-mask-protestors-police-1.5878104


RCMP promise 'action' on anti-mask protesters in Moncton

Codiac Regional RCMP say they will act this week

 

Shane Magee· CBC News· Posted: Jan 19, 2021 8:00 AM AT

 


Codiac Regional RCMP Supt. Tom Critchlow says the force will take some kind of action this week regarding anti-mask protestors who violate the province's emergency measures order. (Kate Letterick/CBC News )

Codiac Regional RCMP say the force will take some kind of action regarding anti-mask protesters in Moncton who violate the province's emergency measures order.

Supt. Tom Critchlow, the commanding officer of Codiac RCMP, told Moncton councillors Monday police would act this week. He didn't offer specifics. 

"This group obviously wants some type of showdown," Critchlow said. 

"There's methods in how we deal with that. Rest assured, I will deal with that. We will deal with [it]. At this point, because of the current state that the province is morphing into, we will take action." 

His comments followed questions last week and by councillors Monday about what the force is doing regarding the protesters who appear to flout rules meant to limit the spread of COVID-19.

A board member of the Codiac Regional Policing Authority, which oversees the force that polices Moncton, Dieppe and Riverview, last week questioned why tickets weren't handed out to those defying the rules.

RCMP officers observed the protests held on weekends outside Moncton city hall. 

Under the orange recovery phase, outdoor gatherings are limited to 25 people and masks are required outside when physical distancing can't be maintained. 

Critchlow told the police authority that the force is taking a "measured" approach, observing the protesters and trying to educate them about the rules. 

His comments Monday suggested a change in approach. 

Moncton deputy mayor Shawn Crossman, left, and Coun. Paulette Theriault, shown here in 2018, expressed frustration with violations of the COVID-19 rules. (Shane Magee/CBC)

Moncton deputy mayor Shawn Crossman said he understands people have a right to protest, but said he's anxious to see COVID-19 rules enforced. 

"It's really frustrating," Crossman said of those violating rules. 

Coun. Paulette Thériault also said she's not impressed by the protests. 

She said more than two million deaths worldwide have been linked to COVID-19. 

"To say that we shouldn't be concerned is beyond my comprehension," Thériault said. 

"I don't think we can ever educate these people because I don't think they really want to hear what the realities are out there."

"But if we can find solutions so that at least we can protect our citizens, I think this is extremely important."

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/anti-mask-rally-covid-19-1.5886951 

 

Charges laid after Moncton anti-mask rally

Codiac Regional RCMP had said ‘action’ would be taken against those violating COVID-19 rules

 

Shane Magee· CBC News· Posted: Jan 25, 2021 4:36 PM AT 

 


An anti-mask protest took place in Moncton over the weekend, and at least five people were arrested. (Radio-Canada )

Charges have been laid against several people at an anti-mask protest held in Moncton on Sunday. 

Codiac Regional RCMP arrested at least five people who appeared in Moncton provincial court Monday by phone from police holding cells. 

The arrests followed Codiac Regional RCMP telling Moncton council last week that officers would take action regarding anti-mask protesters flouting provincial rules meant to limit the spread of COVID-19. 

2 people face criminal charges

All five were issued tickets for alleged violations of New Brunswick's Emergency Measures Act. It's alleged they attended an outdoor gathering of more than five people while not wearing a mask. 

Jonathan Rossiter, 29, of Nackawic, and Dawn Teakles, 49, of Moncton, face charges of assaulting police officers and obstructing police officers. 

Crown prosecutor Remi Allard told provincial court Judge Lucie Mathurin he was objecting to their release from custody but wanted time to review their files in more detail. 

Later in the day, he told the judge the Crown would consent to their release on various conditions, including staying away from Moncton City Hall, where protests have been held. They are scheduled to return to court to enter a plea on Feb. 22. 

"We can no longer gather peacefully?" Teakles asked the judge Monday afternoon. 

"I'm not here to give you a legal opinion," Mathurin said, telling her she'd have to consult with a lawyer.

Earlier in the day, Allard said he was seeking to have all five held pending bail hearings. 

"At this point it is repetition of the offence," Allard said.

'This is false imprisonment'

Rossiter in a boisterous appearance told the judge he had a medical exemption that allows him not to wear a mask. 

Others charged also alleged they have medical exemptions that allow them not to wear masks.

Rossiter, appearing by phone, yelled that he wasn't part of the protest and was only there filming. 

"This is false imprisonment," Rossiter said. 

After the judge outlined the ticket involving the alleged violation of the province's emergency order, Rossiter said "there is no emergency." 

"Everything you just said is fraudulent, it's pathetic," he said, going on to say he would charge all of the police officers involved."

"Everything you're doing is illegal, you criminals," he said. 

David West, 54, of Riverview, Nicholas DeAngelis, 34, of Bathurst, and Britney Green, 31, of Bathurst, were issued tickets for violations of the Emergency Measures Act. 

Mathurin appeared skeptical when the Crown objected to their release earlier in the day. 

"This is the 10th such occasion that the RCMP have dealt with her," Allard said of Green, noting she had also been ticketed by the Kennebecasis Regional Police Force on Saturday. The judge noted that would have involved travelling between two health zones, something that's discouraged under COVID-19 rules. 

West, DeAngelis and Green remain in custody with a bail hearing scheduled for Thursday. 


CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/anti-mask-protesters-court-bail-hearing-1.5891526

 

Two Moncton protesters released on bail, another sent for psychiatric evaluation

Three were arrested for allegedly violating the province's COVID-19 restrictions during protest

Shane Magee· CBC News· Posted: Jan 28, 2021 6:24 PM AT


Five people were arrested and held in custody. Four have been released, with one person ordered to undergo a psychiatric evaluation. (Guy LeBlanc/Radio-Canada)

Two people have been released on bail while a third has been sent for a psychiatric evaluation after being arrested for allegedly violating the province's COVID-19 restrictions during an anti-mask protest in Moncton on Sunday.

Bathurst residents Britney Green, 31, and Nicholas DeAngelis, 34, were among five arrested and charged at a protest at Moncton City Hall. 

Crown prosecutor Maurice Blanchard argued Green should be held in custody pending trial based on repeated violations of the province's emergency measures imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

"At some point, enough is enough," Blanchard said during Green's bail hearing, which wasn't subject to a publication ban.

Provincial court Judge Brigitte Volpé decided to release Green. Following that decision, the Crown decided not to oppose DeAngelis's release given the case was based on similar facts. 

RCMP officers issued tickets and arrested several people at the protest for violating the province's emergency measures imposed to limit the spread of COVID-19. (Guy LeBlanc/Radio-Canada)

Volpé ordered a third person arrested, 54-year-old David West of Riverview, to undergo a 30-day psychiatric evaluation at the request of duty counsel Guillaume LeBlanc.

"I'm just not all there in the head right now," West told the court before the judge issued the order. West returns to court Feb. 25. 

Green, West and DeAngelis were all scheduled to appear in court for bail hearings one after the other on Thursday afternoon. 

All appeared by video conference, Green from the New Brunswick Women's Correctional Centre in Miramichi and the other two from the Southeast Regional Correctional Centre in Shediac. 

New charges were laid against all three alleging they violated the Emergency Measures Act by failing to wear a mask in public spaces on several occasions.

Criminal charges laid

They also face criminal charges in connection with an alleged incident at the the Superstore on Main Street in Moncton on Dec. 31. 

Those charges include causing a disturbance by screaming, interfering with lawful use of property, resisting police officers and obstructing police.

Blanchard told Volpé that Green had been warned about failing to wear a mask in December at Walmart, a Superstore in Moncton, No Frills in Shediac, the Champlain Place mall in Dieppe and a Superstore in Moncton.

"At some point, this has to stop," Blanchard said. "Ms. Green has shown right now she does not want to follow the rules."

Green testified during her bail hearing that she has a doctor's note exempting her from wearing a mask because of anxiety and claustrophobia. 

Under cross-examination by Blanchard, she said the note was obtained through an online appointment with a doctor in Ontario.

Asked why she had a doctor in Ontario if she lives in New Brunswick, Green said she used an online form and "that's where this doctor is located." She said she found the doctor through an "online clinic." 

Blanchard said the note exempts her from wearing a mask "if safe to do so." 

In her decision, Volpé said she took the note into consideration when deciding to grant Green bail. 

"This is bail hearing, not a trial," Volpé said. "So the rules of evidence are different, they're not the same. I do take this information into consideration for my decision today."

Several people were arrested and ticketed at the protest outside Moncton city hall. (Radio-Canada )

The judge said the Crown presented little information about Green's participation in the Moncton protest that led to her arrest. 

"I have no information to permit me to evaluate the risk she may have posed that day," Volpé said.

An RCMP officer was present in the courtroom, but the Crown did not call on him to testify. 

Had the judge denied bail, the province's Provincial Offences Procedure Act would have required a trial be set within eight days.

LeBlanc, the duty counsel lawyer, indicated that had that occurred, the defence would file a challenge alleging the short-time frame violates Green's charter rights by not allowing enough time to prepare an adequate defence.

Green and DeAngelis are scheduled to return to court March 10 to enter a plea on the charges they face. 

Jonathan Rossiter, 29, of Nackawic, and Dawn Teakles, 49, of Moncton were also arrested and charged following the protest in Moncton on Sunday. Both were released on Monday and are scheduled to return to court Feb. 22. 

 

 

So my Mom recounted a true life scenario to us tonight where she was told she tested positive for covid after supper last night. They took her to the quarantine area of tucker hall. (Yes she lives in the nursing home with the ‘outbreak’. )
They put her in a room with a man who seemingly is asymptomatic but def positive.
Then they came after a few minutes and took her back to her room and said there was a mistake, that she was not positive. False alarm!
And as Long as she was only Exposed to the positive patient for less Than 15 minutes, all is swell.
👆👍🧐😉🤫
83 Comments
Omg seriously
I’m so sorry they did this to her!
This covid is SO smart
It’s amazing
Let's hope so!!??
Scary Liz! Hope your Mom is okay!
Oh
Liz Kramer
, I so sorry this happened to your mom.
I wonder how many more people this has happened to in and out of the nursing home. 😰
I guess I didn’t want to seem so cynical in my post but can anyone imagine a scenario where a mistake could be made With an individuals LAB RESULTS??????
Please explain this to me. And if you say to err is human, well, I’m going to laugh about that.
Liz Kramer
it would be the most ignorant response.
I’m so truly sorry your mom had that stress on her. ❤️
Liz Kramer
this sounds like something from a horror movie
Liz Kramer
the testing method proves nothing. They could test someone 10 times and probably get a positive one min and a negative the next.
Liz Kramer
Hmmmm..woudl the media be interested in knowing they exposed an "innocent" to a positive patient? And then brought her back out to potentially give it to others? You could really make some noise about that move! And 15 minutes...amazing covid can tell time now, quite a virus!
I figured if election fraud was not newsworthy enough (and is still
Unaddressed BTW), why would they want to point out blantant covid ridiculousness that doesn’t support their narrative?
True enough. But it seems the news eats up all and everything covid related. But you are right, one agenda. Although fb can spread a story too 🙂 But all that aside, I do hope your momma is o.k.
To call them out on their bullshit will get us nowhere, we have been there and done that, where are people to turn in these COVID times? No one gave a shit before, they certainly give less shits now!!!!!!!
This is scary... I hope she is ok
What the actual F**K?
That is crazy
Swell, just SWELL!!!!
I’m really sorry your mom experienced that trauma.
Oh no! Hugs Liz! Hope she’ll be ok!
That is traumatic to put someone through...The logistics of this makes no sense on a lot of levels.
I read your post as they took the wrong nursing home pt to that room, your mom. I’m sure the lab results were in right names and you wouldn’t know that quick if it was a lab mix up.im sorry to read this as your mom is definitely high risk pt. Prayers she stays well 💗
Liz, is your mother hip to the bullshit, and thus not the least be actually concerned for her health?
Drew Curry
she doesn’t know what to think!
She Recognizes there is something amiss but cannot put her finger on it. It’s scary when all the people around you bombard you with their forced cautions daily.
For example, she has to ride in an ambulance back and forth to dialysis 3 times a week. It’s a very short distance, and vastly overdone I’d say. And she has never been tested positive merely Lives in a facility where someone)s) have tested positive but still gets the full gear like she has tested positive and full Isolation as well.
Drew Curry
btw, she has had at least 4 nasal swabs done since the first case was discovered, with more in the pipeline!
She’s tired of it.
That swab i would refuse steadfastly. An ambulance to dialysis? I know the dialysis room well, having been taking my dad for 2+ years now.
Drew Curry
yes since the first case in the most recent outbreak my Negative tested
Mother has been transported to and from Dialysis in an ambulance when she would Normally Take the handibus.
Well, I just thank God that your mom, my Romaine is not positive, with COVID!!! It was a mistake!!! I thank God and continue praying for all who are sick!!
Joanne Marlene LeBlanc
love you Joanne, hope you are all well!❤️
Ahhhhhh wtf. Wow
1
R u kidding me 🤦‍♀️ poor mama .. you must be upset 😞 sending you hugs
I’m so sad this is all going on it’s horrendous what’s going on
Why would they room her with a man? (Call me old fashioned.)
Dana Stoesz
that was a question on my
Mind.
Oh my... Not even sure what to say here
Chantelle D Hyde
exactly, speechless!
All I keep seeing is about being kind! Our own family is not kind to each other, we are doomed, planned maybe?🙏🏼. Wow, how dare I!
hopefully they didn't infect your mother! i feel like we are in some communist orwellian hellscape full of power hungry "bought off" liars.
Omg big hug
Incompetence at that level is intolerable...the outcome from a misdiagnosis can and has been a life changing error. Some one has to be accountable.... Your Mom has enough troubles... Air hug.
Province to spend $6M on Rising Tide affordable housing plan in Moncton | CBC News
CBC.CA
Province to spend $6M on Rising Tide affordable housing plan in Moncton | CBC News
Province to spend $6M on Rising Tide affordable housing plan in Moncton | CBC News
N.B. special care sector needs to change, say some MLAs | CBC News
CBC.CA
N.B. special care sector needs to change, say some MLAs | CBC News
N.B. special care sector needs to change, say some MLAs | CBC News

 


Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?

$
0
0

 https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies

 

Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?
I see that many libelous comments were deleted this morning but the CBC and the RCMP will be sued.

 

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/methinks-plot-has-thickened-within-this.html

 

 #cdnpoli#nbpoli

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-covid-roundup-dec-12-2020-1.5839158

 

 

 ---------- Original message ----------
From: Chuck Thompson <chuck.thompson@cbc.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:20:57 -0800
Subject: Annual Leave Re: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 YO HUBBY
LACRIOX WHY DOES CBC CONTINUE TO BLOCK MY COMMENTS AND IGNORE MY
LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CROWN?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

I'll be away from the office until Monday, February 1st.  In my
absence, please contact Emma Bedard at emma.bedard@cbc.ca or on
416-205-7831.

Thanks,
Chuck

Chuck Thompson
Head of Public Affairs
CBC English Services
416-205-3747
416-509-3315 (cell)


--
Chuck Thompson
Head of Public Affairs
CBC English Services
416-205-3747
416-509-3315 (cell)



---------- Original message ----------
From: Dan Ciraco <dan.ciraco@cbc.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:20:55 -0800
Subject: OUT OF OFFICE Re: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 YO HUBBY
LACRIOX WHY DOES CBC CONTINUE TO BLOCK MY COMMENTS AND IGNORE MY
LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CROWN?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

I am currently out of the office, returning on February 1, 2016.

For immediate assistance, please contact my assistant at andre.st-amant@cbc.ca

Thank you.


--
Dan Ciraco
Senior Legal Counsel
Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
416-205-3352
 [image]
NOTICE :  This e-mail is confidential, may be privileged and is
intended for the exclusive use of the addressee.  If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify us immediately and delete all
copies.  Thank you.

 

Your account has been banned until February 11, 2021. Reason: We have banned this account for 60 days because we believe it is in violation of our Terms of Use, specifically repeated off topic/ uncivil comments. For more information, please visit: http://cbc.ca/submissions.  

 FaceBook

Your account has been banned until May 31, 2021. Reason: We have banned this account for 6 months because we believe it is in violation of our Terms of Use, specifically repeated personal attacks and off topic/ uncivil comments. For more information, please visit: http://cbc.ca/submissions.  

 motomaniac333@gmail.com

Your account has been banned until May 31, 2021. Reason: We have banned this account for 6 months because we believe it is in violation of our Terms of Use, specifically repeated personal attacks and off topic/ uncivil comments. For more information, please visit: http://cbc.ca/submissions.


Your account has been banned permanently. Reason: We have permanently banned this account because we believe it is in violation of our Terms of Use. For more information, please visit: http://cbc.ca/submissions .

Your account has been banned permanently. Reason: Your username is a violation of our Submission Guidelines, for more information please visit: http://www.cbc.ca/aboutcbc/discover/submissions.html. Your account has been blocked and all comments associated are no longer viewable by other users on our site. If you believe this has been done in error please contact us via cbc.ca/contact..

COVID-19 roundup: 1 new case in N.B. as Edmundston enters orange recovery phase

7 workers at Edmundston Regional Hospital have been diagnosed with COVID-19

 

CBC News· Posted: Dec 12, 2020 11:58 AM AT |



32 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story. 



View your notifications
David Amos
Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: Nope. Same as always 
 
 
View the profile of "Barry Winters"
Barry Winters
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Methinks the only thing to thicken here would be the bootmarks on our fierce unethical animal yessy plants? 
 
 
View the profile of "Byron Prior"
Byron Prior
Reply to @Barry Winters: I’d just like to thank the Radar Group for having my back here. I truly appreciate it. 
 
 
Tony Mcalbey 
Reply to @David Amos: Higgy hopefully shows up to answer questions he dodged last week
 
 
Michel Forgeron 
Reply to @Byron Prior: Byron, can you tell me who did all those posts during the night? I see most of them are gone this morning. Thanks.
 
 









View your notifications
David Amos
Methinks Higgy is relieved to know that my 97 year old Mother who is locked down in the Shannex has not been bothered by that pesky virus yet. At least Higgy can't deny that she is the widow of New Brunswick's Chief Electoral Officer 1972 - 1984 who was a CoR Party member when he was one of its wannabe leaders N'esy Pas? 
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: So daddy is a bean counter. Whom you go after, and sis is a lawyer? You are special
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @David Amos: I’m glad Granny Nickerson is doing well still. Everyone and his dog knows I’m named after both my grandads but there’s also a step-grandad that Papa is alluding to here.
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: Granny Nickerson loves me more than Dad does that’s for sure.
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Ray Oliver: And my uncle Scott who is his brother owns a Kia dealership in Fredericton also.
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: you were upper echelon govt royalty. When did it comes off the rails messy paws?
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Ray Oliver: I can answer that. Two things. Uncle Brian swimming while drunk on booze which dad gave him and he drowned, and having my older sister. He was also in tax trouble big time so he closed his shop and ditched his ex and my sister and moved to the states where he met my mom
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Gracie Amos: Wait. Dad told me Uncle Dale was drinking with Brian that day.
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Gracie Amos: I thought via his election interview he needed to experience the kindness of others and hit the open road as a free spirit. Whoooops
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Just like he accidentally touched Grace that one time. He’s a bigger spin doctor than the ones he complains about.
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: He’s also at least as dishonest as the people he complains about. His record speaks for itself in that regard.
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Gracie Amos: but he's sued more people than anyone in human history. He's an "ethical animal"!!!
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Ray Oliver: So ethical that he owes my mom never received one dime in child support for me or Max.
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Sorry for the garbled speech. I’m on the nod at the moment. What I mean is he never sent mom any support for us ever.
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Gracie Amos: so what about the elusive Medicare card? Methinks there's more than meets the eye Gracie
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: He never stays in one province long enough to get it back since he’s been back in Canada.
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: He conveniently forgets to mention that to his audience
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Max Amos: cross country tour of asylums
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: That and people he’s trying to mooch off of
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Max Amos: Ethical Stress tested Animal. A legend in his own mind 
 
 
Carlson MacKenzie
Reply to @Ray Oliver: He's got the multiple accounts deal running pretty smooth. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SarahRose Werner
Hopefully Saint John is the "hot spot" in the sense that a cooling lava flow is still hot for some time after the eruption is definitely over. :-)
 
 
Emery Hyslop-Margiso
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Hmm . . . Sounds very warm for pandemic talk.
 
 
Phil Collins
Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: Sarah Rose has been blowing enough hot air during the pandemic to heat most of the Southwest portion of New Brunswick!
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Content disabled 
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks you and your buddies would not be having so much fun with this nonsense if YOUR Mother was locked down in Shannex in Saint John like mine is right now N'esy Pas?
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Phil Collins: I concur
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: Methinks you should wonder why my reply to the Yankee lady's joke went "Poof' N'esy Pas?
 
 
Harvey York
Reply to @David Amos: methinks everybody knows why it went poof except for you  

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-roundup-tuesday-dec-8-1.5832816 

 

N.B. COVID-19 roundup: 5 new cases Tuesday, Fredericton students can return to school

Regular in-school routines will resume after COVID-19 case was confirmed Monday

 

Marie Sutherland· CBC News· Posted: Dec 08, 2020 2:32 PM AT

 

 

 

178 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story. 




 
View your notifications
David Amos
Content disabled
Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Methinks Higgy et al ain't too concerned about my 97 year old Mother being locked down in Shannex with that pesky virus because my sister the lawyer/nurse/ former patient advocate works there N'esy Pas?
 
 
View the profile of "DeanRoger Ray"
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: So why can’t Nancy help you get a medical card? I don’t understand that.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks you should ask your buddy Higgy and his Attorney General why that is N'esy Pas?
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: BTW Methinks your RCMP pals and their FBI buddies are very well aware that you were not very wise to pretend to be my children last night N'esy Pas?
 
 
View the profile of "DeanRoger Ray"
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: I would but they wouldn’t know who you are.











Tony Mcalbey
So much for the experts saying the vaccine was safe for “all”, health care workers in uk vaccinated have had severe reactions within a day.
 
 
Billy Buckner
Reply to @Tony Mcalbey: prove it.
 
 
Tony Mcalbey
Reply to @Billy Buckner: prove ?
 
 
Reply to @Billy Buckner: U.K. probing if allergic reactions linked to Pfizer vaccine on CTV news.
 
 
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Tony Mcalbey: Methinks CTV was not supposed to be telling that around N'esy Pas?
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Billy Buckner: Methinks Higgy et al and of course their SANB buddies will enjoy arguing the words within the oldest comment thread for years N'esy Pas?
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Billy Buckner: Say hey to Higgy for me will ya?
 
 
Billy Buckner
Reply to @Tony Mcalbey: yes, show us the article backing up your claim.
 
 
 
Reply to @Stephan Sommers: yes, people with certain allergies may have reactions, that's nice, there is hardly a drug on the market that has no side affects for certain people including tylenol. Not enough to dissuade the general public from taking it.
 
 
 
Reply to @Jack Dawkins: in the large scheme of things, this is trivial.
 
 
Billy Buckner
Reply to @David Amos: why don't you, oh right, you are not allowed in most public buildings, sorry, I keep forgetting.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Billy Buckner: Methinks higgy et al know why I suggested that the RCMP go on a mission to find out you truly are because I doubt you even know how to play baseball very well N'esy Pas?
 
 
View the profile of "DeanRoger Ray"
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: The RCMP are not your personal army Amos.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Of course not
Methinks everybody knows by now that they work with YOU Hence I must sue them N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
View the profile of "DeanRoger Ray"
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: That didn’t work last time did it?

 

 

 

 

 

 


Marc Martin
Where are the cases ??

 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Marc Martin: There is lot "cases" in the old folks home where my 97 year old Mother resides Methinks that fact made your day N'esy Pas?
  
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @David Amos: That’s not nice Papa.
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: Stopping picking on Dad you goof
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: Stop picking on him Max.
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Gracie Amos: Make me tramp
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: Come on! After all our favorite uncle just passed. Have a heart. You know Dad can be a little off. Let it go will you?
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Gracie Amos: Whatever. At least I can stick to one man at a time.
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: You’re just jealous. But for real don’t wind him up again. With Covid and all he doesn’t need Chalmers.
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Gracie Amos: Agreed. Done.
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: Thanks big bro!
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Gracie Amos Max Amos: Methinks Higgy and the lawyers working for the RCMP and CBC are gonna enjoy their next email N"'esy Pas?
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @David Amos: Sorry Dad. I told him to stop.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: Enjoy

January 30, 2007

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Mr. David Amos

Dear Mr. Amos:

This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve Graham of the RCMP °J" Division in Fredericton.

Sincerely,
Honourable Michael B. Murphy
Minister of Health CM/cb
 
 
 
Reply to @David Amos: Not really, I wouldn't wish this virus to anyone, hope your mom is ok man.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Marc Martin: Methinks Higgy et al and of course their SANB buddies will enjoy arguing the words within this and various other comment threads for years N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
Reply to @Marc Martin: Go figure why I was blocked

N.B. reports 14 new cases of COVID-19 as Shannex Saint John outbreak rises
6 new cases confirmed at Parkland Saint John, 1 case confirmed at Harrison Trimble High School in Moncton
Alexandre Silberman · CBC · Posted: Nov 29, 2020 10:17 AM AT
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Marc Martin: Can you imagine someone pretending to be your children and saying such things to each other?

Methinks I know what you would do However as you well know already did so once but with no avail while you people make fun of me perhaps my kids will have better luck than I in the US of A N'esy Pas?
 
 
View the profile of "DeanRoger Ray"
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Personally I think it’s sad that you care more about what is said on the internet than what is going on in their own real lives. Instead of calling the RCMP why not call them and have a heart to heart about the issues you get teased about eh messy paws?

 

 

 







James Edward
did russell wish everyone a "happy holidays" and then wish jewish people a happy Hanukkah....? 
 
 
June Arnott
Reply to @James Edward: why do people get offended when someone wishes them well? So over the top
 
 
 
Reply to @June Arnott: why not say Merry Christmas at this time of year, NB is still majority Christian, also Hanukkah starts tomorrow not today.
 
 
 
James Edward
Reply to @June Arnott: I'm not offended either, just gets old the hypocrisy of government bureaucrats.
 
 
Kevin Ellerdale
Reply to @James Edward: Its because tonight is the first night of hanukkah. Duh. Stop being so sensitive.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Kevin Ellerdale: Methinks the Yuletide season is upon us as well but I do not see much "Good Will" coming in my little Clan's direction N'esy Pas?
 
 
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @James Edward: Jewish holidays always start at sundown. Hanukkah starts at sundown this evening, with tomorrow being the first full day. And if the briefing had been held on Christmas Eve, Dr Russell would almost certainly have wished people a merry Christmas.
 
 
James Edward
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: uh huh....will see.
 
 
James Edward
Reply to @Kevin Ellerdale: I'm not sensitive, I just want the same respect for all people,
 
 
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @James Edward: If you want the same respect for all people, would you agree that *everyone's* December holiday should be a statutory holiday as Christmas is?
 
 
Buford Wilson 
(The Dominion of Canada is Christian, SarahRose.)
 
 
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Buford Wilson: It *was* back in 1867. Things change. 
 
 
Buford Wilson (
Our Head of State is also head of the Church of England, SarahRose.)
 
 
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Buford Wilson: Exactly what percentage of the population considers themselves to be not only Christian but specifically Anglican?
 
 
SarahRose Werner
Reply to @Buford Wilson: I would also point out that unlike the UK, we don't celebrate the monarch's birthday. Instead a statutory holiday on the last Monday before May 25 gives people a long weekend. There's no reason not to make the last Monday before December 25 a statutory holiday instead of Christmas. Call it Winter Day and let it carry the commercial burden that Christmas has assumed, leaving Christmas as a religious holiday for practicing Christians.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Who is WE???
 
 
View the profile of "Byron Prior"
Byron Prior
Reply to @David Amos: Come on. The only queen whose birthday you celebrate is Max.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks you as a Yankee gladly took an oath to the Queen you do not seem to admire in order to settle here and enjoy our liberal society and our free health care etc N'esy Pas?
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Byron Prior: Watch it babe. I am a princess thank you very much!
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: I’ll vouch for that.
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Gracie Amos: You just wish you had a man as fine as mine.
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: Not really big bro. I’ve always been all about quantity rather than quality.
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Gracie Amos: You know, there’s a word for you. And it starts with a W..
 
 
View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
Reply to @Max Amos: Wasted??
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @Gracie Amos: Well that one too now that I think about it
 
 
Buford Wilson
(May 24 is usually called Victoria Day, SarahRose. And July 1 is Dominion Day.)
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Reply to @Buford Wilson: True
 
 
 
Reply to @SarahRose Werner: no we are a christian country.

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/63-nb-jobs-lost-as-cannabis-company-closes-up-shop-1.5834541#vf-all_threads-9682600020082 

 

63 N.B. jobs lost as cannabis company closes up shop

Canopy Growth shutters its Tweed recreational cannabis location in Fredericton

Shane Fowler· CBC News· Posted: Dec 09, 2020 3:10 PM AT
 
 
86 Comments 
Commenting is now closed for this story.
 
 
 
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Why is it that i don't feel bad about this news?
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Content disabled efore I could read it
Reply to @David Amos: 
 
 
 
Johnny Jakobs
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Your Uncle Ronnie is more successful than you.
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: whos ronnie?
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: do you even do laundry?
 
 
Johnny Jakobs
Reply to @Ray Oliver: laundry? The cleaner does that stuff.
 
 
View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Johnny Jakobs: checkmate. Good one
 
 
 
Reply to @David Amos: because you grow your own?
 
 
 
Reply to @David Amos: Because Gracie likes the harder stuff. No pun intended of course...

 

 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-19-new-brunswick-dec-9-facebook-live-saint-john-orange-1.5833988

 

N.B. COVID-19 roundup: Russell says vaccine administration will likely take 12 months

New case is in Saint John and travel-related, province also warns of possible exposure on 2 flights

 

152 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

 


Ben Haroldson
On a lighter note, earthquake here in charco this morning. Mag 3.
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos 
Reply to @Ben Haroldson: I heard the sky is falling too
 
 
 
SarahRose Werner 
Reply to @Ben Haroldson: I appreciate your sense of humour, Ben.
 
 
 
Brent Harris Blizzard
Reply to @Ben Haroldson: There is a Whale in the Hudson River today, go figure.
 
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Brent Harris Blizzard: Did Trump go for a dip???
 
 
View the profile of "DeanRoger Ray"
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: No but Laura did. Hence...
 
 
View your notifications
David Amos
 Content disabled
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks the RCMP lawyer are gonna enjoy reviewing your words for years N'esy Pas? 
 
 
 
 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/satellite-internet-low-earth-orbit-streaming-video-conferencing-1.5817966 

 

Elon Musk's satellites now streaming to some rural N.B. homes

Public launch of service possible by mid-2021

 

Connell Smith· CBC News· Posted: Nov 27, 2020 7:00 AM AT

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
398 Comments 
 
 
 
 
David Amos
I listened to CBC this morning celebrate Smiths last day and just shook my head for obvious reasons

Methinks I will send him one last email for equally obvious reasons N'esy Pas?
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: Straight to the Spam bin once again, just for old times sake.
 
 
Mary MacKenzie
Reply to @David Amos: It seems you posted on the wrong article.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Mary MacKenzie: NOPE this is his last article

Methinks Higgy everybody else "in the know" knows why I laughed when the unemployed Hance Colburne called in to his old show N'esy Pas?
 
  
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: What you said of my children will never be forgiven
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: again. Think you have me confused with others on here.. I strictly like my digs at you only hahah
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: BTW I just got off the phone with your hero Mr Smith
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: "Hey look everyone someone answered my call! They did, they really did!"
 
 
David White
Reply to @David Amos: no
 
 
David White
Reply to @David Amos: Was it plugged in this time?
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David White: its just his nurse that answers they let him have a little victory every once in a while in the ward to keep his spirits up
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Douglas James
"Upfront costs could be a barrier to some. Rekounas paid $820 for the required Starlink hardware, a satellite receiving dish, modem, power supply and 100 feet of cable. The subscription fee is then $130 a month." I live in Saint John and pay $120 a month in the great Bell ripoff so $130 doesn't sound too bad at all, even with the requirement for hardware.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Douglas James: I want it ASAP
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: Methinks your old associate Smith knows its rather obvious I need it for the little rural abode that the RCMP shills falsely claim I don't own N'esy Pas?
 
 
Ray Oliver 
Reply to @David Amos: The taxpayer will cover that for you. Along with the rest of your adulthood we have
 
 
Ray Oliver 
Reply to @David Amos: who did you scam to get this abode? You didn't come by it honestly thats for certain
 
 
David White
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Is a cardboard box under a bridge called an Abode now?
 
 
Harvey York
Reply to @David Amos: some people shouldn't be allowed to have internet. You're one of them
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Harvey York: Methinks many Feds on both sides of the Medicine Line no doubt agree with you N'esy Pas? 
 
 
Harvey York 
Reply to @David Amos: as do many tax paying, law abiding citizens who resent that their taxes support your nincompoopery
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to @Harvey York: None of your cohorts support me

However no tax payer dollars support me either Hell I don't even have a medicare card or EVEN a Social Insurance Number REMEMBER???
 
 
Ray Oliver 
Reply to @David Amos: Now that right there is BS. No SIN #. Ya right
 
 
Ray Oliver 
Reply to @David Amos: you don't work what do you need one of those for anyway?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
David White
There is a huge difference between 'Rural High Speed' and 'Urban High Speed', what are the download/upload speeds on this system? There is no context to the story without that.
 
 
Mat Land
Reply to @David White: as per the included photo, he's getting 150 Mbps.
 
 
Ed Roberts
Reply to @David White: Did you see the picture on this post. It shows 150 Mbps down, which is a bit high because most posts on Youtube are always above 50 Mbps down and well up into the hundreds and above 30 Mmpb upload. The delays is average 30 ms. Outright top end performance especially since Starlink is unlimited data.
 
 
David White
Reply to @David White: Great did not see that on my phone screen, would be nice to see that in text.
 
 
Greg Rekounas
Reply to @David White: Using Ookia Speedtest app just now, I got 109 Mbps, and 15.8 on the upload.

Really low latency, and had no rain fade issues with the heavy rain we had last couple of days.
 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Greg Rekounas: How did you manage to get it? I registered but nothing thus far and i live across the ferry from you in the hills and certainly could use it ASAP
 
 
Rory Weiner
Reply to @David Amos: Same question here , I signed up on their site months ago , still fingers crossed
 
 
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: credit check ?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Al Clark: Methinks the CRTC, the CRAand Higgy et al must recall why I gave the Space X office a call quite a while ago and left a message for their tax lawyer Michael Sylvester N'esy Pas? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Rory Weiner: FYI Not that it should make any difference but my son and i are fans of Musk and my son does live in California and drives a brand new Tesla 

I wanted to get the service so bad that I even Musk's lawyer a call but to no avail.

Methinks I have the right to suspect why I am being ignored is political in nature N'esy Pas?
 
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: No. It’s because lawyers don’t have the ability to establish internet service. His people are not going to waste their time even bothering to tell you to call Customer Service.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks you do have no clue FYI Dummy he was the dude who represented Musk before the CRTC so Musk could sell us Internet service Mr Jones should have informed you that the lawyer for the EUB I argued is its latest Commissioner N'esy Pas?
 
 
https://media.viafoura.net/user_pictures/1374800020365_2_120x120.jpg
Max Amos
Content disabled 
Reply to @David Amos: That’s correct. My boyfriend bought me one for my birthday. He’s such a sweetie. But yeah Tesla makes some great cars.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Max Amos: Oh My MY looks like my son has every right to sue the Queen in the US of A EH?
 
 
https://media.viafoura.net/user_pictures/1374800020365_2_120x120.jpg
Max Amos
Reply to @David Amos: Calm down Papa. I don’t share your lawyer fantasies.
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: oh that transcript of your argument they let you in was great. It made ABSOLUTELY no sense
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @Max Amos: Good call Max. Its a losing battle. Takes some longer than others to figure that one out.
 
 
Al Clark
Reply to @David Amos: Wanting to book a flight with a ranger load of empties?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


David Amos 
Methinks CBC choice of an excellent cover of an ol Hank song dedicated to Mr Smith's last day at work was right on the money N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray 
Reply to @David Amos: A Boy Named Sue would be good for you.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: well Dirty Dicky trust I would be flat out honoured

Methinks any kid (mine certainly do) would love the late great Shel Silverstein books as well. However even the biblepounder in you must recall my favourite poem of his that was only published once that i know of and it can be found within the 25th Anniversary edition of Playboy which I still carry a copy of to this very day N'esy Pas?
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: Pages all stuck together yet?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: The Devil and Billy Markham If memory serves...
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: BINGO You Feds keep good records

 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Do your recall what lawyer I dealt with who was honest about me and Madoff?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Can you name the Yankee lawyer who sent a pile of wiretap tapes to Washington after I ran in the election of the 39th Parliament?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Name your buddy Deputy Dog's lawyer if ya dare
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Can you name the floor of the Chalmers they like to house him on, his condition, and the attending physician? Bonus points for the length of stay!!!
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: I recall you getting a canned form-letter reply from Eliot Spitzer’s office which you held up to brain dead people you were trying to con as “proof” that you caused Madoff to plead guilty in his trial.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: BS you quite simply don't know

Methinks its time your cohorts Googled your name to see who they are in bed with N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @Ray Oliver: There were two docs. One from Mexico and one from Russia. They let him out after 3 days I think.
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Angela Triccoli. You had a bizarre fascination with her posterior as I recall.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Ah yes Angie Baby

Methinks you should google her to see the trouble she have been in since N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Charles LeBlanc blogged it after Werner Bock let him know. Davey got all bootiehurt because everyone found out.
 
 
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Nope Why twist things after stalking my kids for years??? The bible pounder in you should at least confess that Chucky and your evil buddies in Alberta Mr Baconfat and the Mad Shangi violated my privacy and libeled me Chucky went so far as to even compare me to Ashley Smith correct?

Now do tell how many times have you been put in the looney bin for very legitimate reasons and when did your Mother boot you out of her basement so you went to stay with old Harry again whom I happened to like 
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: I really don’t care about her one way or the other. That’s just a name you always used to drop. She sure did a number on you though.
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: So who was Gracie’s lawyer when she got charged with auto theft at age 15?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: No lawyer has ever said that you are the reason Madoff got locked up.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks you should ask the lawyers Marc Litt Wendy Olson and David Kotz about Madoff and I N'esy Pas Mr Private investigator??
 
 
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray:I have no clue However you should not bring up the affairs of underage girls 
 
Methinks whereas you have been stalking my little darling since she was 12 you should know N'esy Pas?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: I am beginning to doubt that you are whom you claim to be because Dirty Dicky ain't that smart even though he claims otherwise Perhaps my first hunch may be correct and you are Deputy Dog after all EH?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Fact checked that one years ago. Olson didn’t remember you at all. If you have proof to the contrary (and form-letter responses to emails don’t count) I’ll walk away right now.  
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: Man you relish this attention even though the guy is slamming you time after time. Sad sad man
 
 
Harvey York 
Reply to @Ray Oliver: he totally gets off on it. Probably drinking a viagra smoothie while he reads all these 
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @Ray Oliver: That’s what it all boils down to. He just likes seeing his name in print. Makes him feel like something other than a mental defective.
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: It’s quite a bit more likely that I’m Dan or John...or that I have a daddy named Cleveland...
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: True
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: Methinks Tony Danny Boy's strange geeky daddy is far too much of a space cadet to figure what his son was up to but Hiigy's lawyer buddy Cleveland got hard copy in 2006 and the Duke his best buddy G$ know it N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: By the way I just spoke with Susan at Jardine. You did not call them and they did not send you any emails. They are trying to reach you though. And just in case you don’t get the answer you need here’s an early Christmas present: The name of the guy who won the auction and has the Panhead is Kevin Jackson. Ring any bells? I suspect you probably guessed that already though.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: BS I talked to Blair again yesterday thanked him for the email and explained to him what was up Furthermore Jackson is in Ontario
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks you are like moth to the flame and have no clue as to what i am up to N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Susan says otherwise. And if Kevin got transferred to Ontario then that’s where your bike is.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks the Fat Fred City Finest will enjoy reading that BS N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Making a rear end of yourself as per usual I assume.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Too Too Funny
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: They stopped reading your emails ten years ago.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Nay not so
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: I talked to Longo personally after two cops called me to discuss Justice Bell's decision She even recognized my voice and sent two cops to court to take pictures of Chucky and his cohort Andre and my buddies too I bet you didn't know that EH? 
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: I bet YOU didn’t know that I’ve had dinner with Reid Chedore on half a dozen occasions.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: If you are Deputy Dog then of course you would You are both brother in laws of mine 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: BTW Hows Chedore doing dealing with the investigation of him in the law society?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Does mommy still call you Dalevid?
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: so you're related to the lawyer Chedore? Haha. And you sue lawyers. He must think you're a peach
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Yup
 
 
David Amos
Content disabled 
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Methinks you morons really should have read my documents before bringing up Chedore FYI my sister is a lawyer too and everybody knows why I am honoured that they hate me N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Why don’t you ask Nancy? Or are you still not speaking?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks you have no clue whats been happening You are just desperately fishing for info because you are in deep doo doo N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Form-letter responses don’t help your case pal.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks the RCMP know I am not pal of yours in fact I doubt you have any friends at all whomever you may truly be N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Nope. Not in any kind of doo doo with the exception of much of what you type. You are no doubt attempting to get another waste-of-time lawsuit together. That’s what’s been happening.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: 3 actually
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Incorrect ma’am.
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: Ohhh 3 big lawsuits. Exciting!!
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: I trust that you will never read them
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @Ray Oliver: This will be some excellent comedy if he’s serious.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Methinks one thing you and your RCMP buddies know for certain is that I am as serious as a heart attack N'esy Pas?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Now are you actually going to have the balls to say my name this time or am I still going to be “one government employee”?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Duhhh???? You are named in T-1557-15
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: You refer everyone daily to T-90210 or whatever it is so im sure you are totally unable to keep your successes private
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Oh you are no doubt drooling all over keyboard.
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: wouldn't it get caught in that rats nest hanging off his chin before it hit the keyboard though?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @Ray Oliver: I bet you would never dare to say that to me in person and standing toe to toe with me
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: Dean Roger Ray is. But I’m not really him. You never mentioned me except to say “...and one government employee”
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @Ray Oliver: It does. But he’s one fierce slobbering animal...
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Oh My My So you admit are breaking the rules of this forum while acting as a government employee?
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: I betcha 20 loonies he would. Why would he be scared of a man who was turned down by the RCMP recruiter for being too short (true story...tell em Davey)
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @David Amos: sure. what overpass do you dwell under? Just give me the mile marker..
 
 
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Ask Higgy where I live If you come to my private property your skinny little arse is MINE
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: I said you referred to me as “one government employee.”. No more and no less. You suck at pro-se arguments buddy.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: BRB I have to blog all this malicious this nonsense of yours before it goes "Poof"
 
 
DeanRoger Ray
Reply to @David Amos: And no doubt changed the pants you’ve soiled in anger eh old man?
 
 
https://media.viafoura.net/user_pictures/1374800020365_2_120x120.jpg 
Max Amos
Reply to @DeanRoger Ray: Actually Papa only changes clothes when he showers which is once every two weeks or so. Be careful about making him mad and having accidents because he has been known to leave his dirty pants on still. Thanks in advance babes. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

N.B. COVID-19 roundup: Fredericton rolled back to orange, 12 new cases reported Thursday

Move to orange is due to high numbers of social interactions, multiple exposure settings, Russell says

Marie Sutherland· CBC News· Posted: Nov 26, 2020 11:42 AM AT 
 
 
 
 410 Comments
 
 
 
PHIL INNIS
The weak have inherited the earth
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @PHIL INNIS: if that's the case whats your share?
 
 
PHIL INNIS
Reply to @Ray Oliver: I'm not a boomer
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @PHIL INNIS: No, a real leader. What did Mom make for supper tonight Phil?
 
 
PHIL INNIS
Reply to @Ray Oliver: it wasn't loneliness like you had a huge helping of
 
 
Ray Oliver
Reply to @PHIL INNIS: it must suck that Trump lost and all those with your like minded mentality is put back into obscurity. It was a good run though guys.
 
 
David White
Reply to @Ray Oliver: Classic. the best burn of the day award.
 
 
David White
Reply to @David White: The supper one that is.
 
 
David White
Reply to @PHIL INNIS: Given your spelling did you mean 'bloomer'?.... Don't worry, You will get there a few more years when they drop and your voice gets deeper.
 
 
David White
Reply to @PHIL INNIS: Gee, he was only joking Phil. I am sure he didn't mean to hurt your feelings for you to resort to such a base comeback. Ray, you need to take it easy on the poor kid.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to @David White: Methinks its you who has his fancy knickers in a knot N'esy Pas?
 
 
David White
Reply to @David Amos: Wethinks you like to imagine that you have anyone in a knot N'esy pas? Wethinks you also think that you still think you matter N'ecy pas?...
 
 
David White
Reply to @David Amos:... plus they aren't that fancy... they are more 'britches' than anything.
 
 
David White
Reply to @David Amos: btw Is britches appropriate for your generation? or is it pantaloons?
 
 
View the profile of "Max Amos"
Max Amos
Reply to @David White: Actually in Papa’s case it’s Depends. Which he may need to change soon by the way.
 
 
David White
Reply to @Max Amos: I was referring to a generation of amateur Shakespearian actors with a penchant to spell French words incorrectly in disdain.
 
 
 
 
 
 

Mar 22, 2005

Comments

David R. Amos

Gotcha POGO I saved the proof of my postings. T fact that you left one of Depoty Dog's postings and yet removed many others before and afterwards makes your malice towards me and the simple truth of our matter undeniable. Your peoplr have proven to me that your organization is fake and no better than any other corporate controled Blog such as Laughing at Liberals and Free Republic etc etc. Sooner or later I will hope to sue your organization in the same complaint with Superman and Deputy Dog. i will be calling your offices tomorrow to prove my sincerity to you. Once i have identified a lawyer in your midst. i will send them hard copy of Deputy Dog and Superman's malice to stress test his ethics to the mmax. Thanks at least for proving for me that even the World Wide web is corporate controled. Freedom even in cyberspace must be defended proptly or all is lost in the real world. I find it interesting that you let my Blogs last so long and yet erased them on the very day the Homeland Security Act was blessed once more by a very corrupt Congress.
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos.

Bob "Deputy Dog" O'Meara

All you had to do to prevent your family from being "thrown" out on the street, was to buy everyone elses share. Didn't that ever occur to you? It is what most normal people would do who only own 25% of something. Buy the other 75%. You two think you can just claim both houses as your own. Thats right, Jean "homesteaded" Milton. Try looking up what the homestead act is. When you thought I was breaking into my own house in Mano, did you ever look at the back door? Always unlocked. I wish it was me destroying the beach house, but I'm sorry to say it was the new owners. All that equipment you saw belonged to them. All the property that was left in the house or on the property was moved or disposed of by the new owner. Thats what happens when you refuse to move yor crap. It is moved for you and at your expense, not ours.Try looking at your own wifes signatures. Which one does she claim is forged now. Seems she can't make up her mind. Oh thats right, she was suffering a nervous breakdown. How long did this breakdown last for? Seems to me she was still working during most of it. First it was over 911, then over the Kickhams, then it was the three of us. You guys should pick one story and stick to it. I think it was over you and the countless times you left to go on another scumbag tour. We all remember them. One of your best was summer of 1990. Remember Jeans delicate condition. You were gone for four and a half to five months while she sat around pissing and moaning about you. Why, I don't know since she does fine without you. Getting back to her signatures, I have about twenty copies of her signature dating as far back as 1980. They all look the same. Maybe thats why no one pays any attention to your bs about forgeries. You have accused a few people of this forgery. Have you made up your mind who you are going to "sue" for that. You must be up in the thousands of people who you are going to sue. I guess that's your full time job. There must be some correct paperwork on file in all these courts. It looks like both houses sold, while you kept yelling that we can't do it. You never did tell anyone why we could not, other than you saying we couldn't. You see where that went. I remember you saying in one of your many documents that you two were willing to match the first offer on the house. What ever happened to that? You and I both know. On Ole Tom, it's a kilt,,,,,,,on you,it's one of your wifes old skirts. You seem to dump on P-town. Seems to me that many of your friends,or former friends, and family go to P-town.Coming from a man in a skirt, I would not put too much credibility in what you say. You keep shitting on Yankees,,,,,,,,, both your children and your wife are Yankees. Thank God you will never be one. In case you are wondering, we are each enjoying our share of the sales, as we should be and so could you. Hopefully those storage fees are not getting too high. Maybe Triple M has alreadt auctioned of your junk. I was able to get my tools back before everything was packed up. You do remember the things you borrowed many years ago and failed to return them. I know that was just an oversight, being the honest man that you are. You should also look into how a deed works. We did not need a deed in our name to sell either property. I'm sure you being such a smart fellow, you looked into that and found a "Dave" loophole. Again,,,,nice try. You're suing the Queen? I didn't think the Queen had anything to do with Canada anymore. But I could be wrong. Don't really care. More useless info. I'm sure she responds to all your correspondence. She better if she knows what is good for her. Don't want her on the Dave list. Weren't you still married when you were messing around with jean and her friend. I really need a smart lawyer to argue with you. You still haven't seen through Barry yet. First he represents you, or Jean, or whoever. Then he Quits because you two don't pay him. Then he represents you because why, you're a political prisoner. That's cute. How much did you have to give him up front? I'm sure a nice chunk. The Mano money came in handy. Now he represents Jean. Thats good too. Same as with Mano, hire a lawyer after everything is done. Kind of like locking the barndoor after the horse is stolen. But this is how you two work, againest everyone and you achieve nothing. This pre-trial has nothing to do withus. It's Greg Chandler verses Jean O'Meara, no one else. Not you either. You need your own country, Daveland, where you can make up all the rules and laws. You don't seem to like any in the States or in Canada anymore. What's up with that. King Dave,,,,,,has a nice ring to it, don't you think. Lets go vacation in Daveland,,, there are no laws there. None that anyone has to obey, anyway. Does your new friend and lawyer know how you feel about lawyers? Or is he the second one that you like? This must all be good for you,,,,your latest excuse to stay away from your family and play with your friends. Thats what a husband and proud papa does. Do you have that in your book? I haven't seen in the stores. What ever happened to the millions you were getting from it? What ever happened to the millions you were awarded in court? Maybe that was another day the US Postal Service was screwing with your mail. With all this money you should be sitting pretty fat about now. Oh well, wish I was as well off as you.

Dean R Ray

A Freemason Speaks
Author Stephen Knight wrote one of the seminal books on freemasonry called 'The Brotherhood' in 1983. During the course of his research for this book he was introduced to a man known as 'Christopher', a mason of the highest 33rd degree ranking. In the Cafe Royal, London, Christopher showed him the papers demonstrating the authenticity of his masonic rank and told Knight that he was keen to "stop the rot" in freemasonry. Stephen Knight asked him what a person might have to fear from a group of influential freemasons if circumstances made him, for instance, a threat to them in the business world; or if he discovered they were using masonry for corrupt purposes; or had fallen a victim of their misuse of freemasonry and would not heed warnings not to oppose them.
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "It is not difficult to ruin a man and I will tell you how it is done time and again. There are more than half a million brethren under the jurisdiction of the Grand Lodge. Standards have been falling for twenty or thirty years. It is too easy to enter the Craft, so many men of dubious morals have joined. The secrecy and power attract such people, and when they come the decent leave. The numbers of people who would never have been considered for membership in the fifties are getting larger all the time. If only five per cent of freemasons use - abuse - the Craft for selfish or corrupt ends it means there are 25,000 of them. The figure is much closer to twelve or thirteen per cent now."
Stephen Knight: "Christopher explained that masonry's nationwide organization of men from most walks of life provided one of the most efficient private intelligence networks imaginable. Private information on anybody in the country could normally be accessed very rapidly through endless permutations of masonic contacts - police, magistrates, solicitors, bank managers. Post Office staff, doctors, government employees. Bosses of firms. A dossier of personal data could be built up on anybody very quickly. When the major facts of an individual's life were known, areas of vulnerability would become apparent. Perhaps he is in financial difficulties; perhaps he has some social vice - if married he might 'retain a mistress' or have a proclivity for visiting prostitutes; perhaps there is something in his past he wishes keep buried, some guilty secret, a criminal offence (easily obtainable through freemason police of doubtful virtue), or other blemish on his character: all these and more could be discovered via the wide-ranging masonic network of 600,000 contacts, a great many of whom were indisposed to do favours for one another because that had been their prime motive for joining. Even decent masons could often be 'conned' into providing information on the basis that 'Brother Smith needs this to help the person involved'. The adversary would even sometimes be described as a fellow mason to the Brother from whom information was sought - perhaps someone with access to his bank manager. The 'good' mason would not go to the lengths of checking with Freemason's Hall whether or not this was so. If the 'target' was presented as a Brother in distress by a fellow mason, especially a fellow lodge member, that would be enough for any upright member of the craft. Sometimes this information gathering process - often involving a long chain of masonic contacts all over the country and possibly abroad - would be necessary. Enough would be known in advance about the adversary to initiate any desired action against him.
'Christopher', the 33rd degree mason: "Solicitors are very good at it. Get your man involved in something legal - it need not be serious - and you have him."
Stephen Knight: "Masons can bring about the situation where credit companies and banks withdraw credit facilities from individual clients and tradesmen, said my informant. Banks can foreclose. People who rely on the telephone for their work can be cut off for long periods. Masonic employees of local authorities can arrange for a person's drains to be inspected and extensive damage to be reported, thus burdening the person with huge repair bills; workmen carrying out the job can 'find' - in reality cause - further damage. Again with regard to legal matters, a fair hearing is hard to get when a man in ordinary circumstances is in financial difficulties. If he is trying to fight a group of unprincipled freemasons skilled in using the 'network' it will be impossible because masonic DHSS and Law Society officials can delay applications for Legal Aid endlessly."
'Christopher', 33rd degree mason: "Employers, if they are freemasons or not, can be given private information about a man who has made himself an enemy of masonry. At worst he will be dismissed (if the information is true) or consistently passed over for promotion. Masonic doctors can also be used. But for some reason doctors seem to be the least corruptible men. There are only two occurrences of false medical certificates issued by company doctors to ruin the chances of an individual getting a particular job which I know about. It's not a problem that need greatly worry us like the rest.
"Only the fighters have any hope of beating the system once it's at work against them. Most people, fighters or not, are beaten in the end, though. It's.... you see, I... you finish up not knowing who you can trust. You can get no help because your story sounds so paranoid that you are thought a crank, one of those nuts who think the whole world is a conspiracy against them. It is a strange phenomenon. By setting up a situation that most people will think of as fantasy, these people can poison every part of person's life. If they give in they go under. If they don't give in it's only putting off the day because if they fight, so much unhappiness will be brought to the people around them that there will likely come a time when even their families turn against them out of desperation. When that happens and they are without friends wherever they look, they become easy meat. The newspapers will not touch them. "There is no defense against an evil which only the victims and perpetrators know exists."
Stalkers/terrorist break down:

Legends
Ordinary people have legitimate family, friends that can account for their existance.
Stalkers live on false legends, and have many other stalkers back up their claim to live an ordinary existence
Strength: is anyone can be decieved due to the fact that we tend to believe references.
weakness:Deeper investigation would show the phony legends and references these people depend on.
Conclusion: The stalkers would have to avoid deep investigations. Stalkers will leave a trail of victims as careers are seldom left to one target.

Targeting victims Jobs
Ordinary citizens are motivated to do the job in trade for money
Stalkers have to be able to do the job plus harm the target and seam motivated for the money. This is made easier under phony investigations. The stalkers can approach the target's work with an official police badge and ask the company for assistance. The company will decide to terminate the employee at the earliest convenience.
Strength: The stalkers can create competition against the target. Companies can be enticed to hire someone of more experience. Stalkers can inform companies of false investigations.
Weakness: Victims can inform the Companies of the truth and reveal the deception if the job is snafued anyway. If the Stalkers are exposed the trail will light up instantly as the events will probably be remembered by the employer. Especially if he sees the target on television telling the truth.
Conclusion: Eventually there should be an adequate pattern to follow that a deep investigation could uncover. Police involvement in the investigations could implicate the players involve working within the R.C.M.P.

Street Theatre
Ordinary Citizens behave in a manner they wish to be treated themselves
Stalkers do not care and have only one agenda, to disrupt the targets everyday schedual.
Strength: The stalkers can create a feelling of hopelessness, create hardships as more and more stalkers become involved. Create uncertainty that would make the victim disoriented and phocused on minor things.
weakness: Pictures and recordings can expose the harrassment and pave the way to a deeper investigation.
Conclusion : Exposure tell family and friends show the recordings, sell them the truth gently. Ask them to storm the police station and demand a deep investigation. upload to the net all evidense so if anything did happen it could not be covered up.

Noisy neighbours
Ordinary neighbours can be nasty depending on who lives beside you. Partiers can keep you up all night and that might be perfectly normal.
Stalkers often never get caught when you call the police. Stalkers know when to be noisy and when to deny you proof. When the ceiling seems like the person is going to stomp right through and you call the authorities. Just before police arrive the place goes silent this is a definate yes that they are Stalkers. When the stalkers surround a target they tend to take up space. Possibly many innocent neighbours are targeted so they can get close to you. Notify neighbours with a letter about multistalking and try not to reveal you are the source unless absolutely neccesary.
Strength: Sleep deprivation is a powerful tool. Stalkers can break the target much easier if the target is not coherent.
Weakness: The property can be linked to somebody that can be investigated. Deeper investigation would either reveal a false name or a stalker that has stalked before. Stalkers have to have an excuse why they are home all day, try to find out what the excuse is. If you know the name of the stalker do a internet background check. Look up case files and see if they show up stalking other Targets and were taken to court.
Conclusion: Always be able to tell the difference between noisy neighbours and stalkers. If you falsely accuse you help the stalkers prove you are incompetant.

Internet resources to search for:
http://www.abika.com/Reports/Satellitephotos.htm
http://www.backgroundcheckgateway.com/
http://www.canlii.org/

WHY?

Deep investigations would require the aquivalent of a murder investigation. Suicides are self explanatory and do not require scrutiny. This is why the stalkers stalk but have good restraint to avoid hurting the target To break the target, and even ask them to give up is just a tip of the iceburg of methods used.

You are the total sum thoughts you think everyday which means if everyday you live in fear of the stalkers you become the rabbit that they mock and chase easily. Reading can empower you and bring you to a level of understanding how the stalking works.

Excellent Books to read:
"BiBle" study it thourough and you will have faith and enlightenment in these troubled times.
"How to win friends and influence people" by andrew Carnagy this book will allow you to build a stronghold of friends and allow you more power to tell the difference between friend and foe.
"criminology" can be found in the library it is good to study how the laws are made and manipulated.
"university of success" by og mandino learn to become a salesman this will help you sell your story to the public and help look for work.
"road less traveled" by scott peck this book can reveal the real issues behind your reactions
"psycocybernetics" this books helps to discover how the self esteem works and can give you a shield against stalkers.
"thinking big" this book will train you to look at the big picture instead of swimming in the small details that can hold you down.
"48 laws of power" by Robert Greene This book will show you what true ruthlessness is and make you more aware of the stalkers way of thinking.
"Art of war" by suntzu Learn how to create decoys tell them one thing and do another. Know your enemy, research your objectives never reveal your true plans.

Sometimes stalkers can be spotted in several ways:

Familiar face in the crowd always there just as you head around the corner. In public places if someone goes to the bathrooms looks in and then walks in view to count heads then sits back in the shadows. These are trained watchers. They most likely will not interact but most likely the stalkers are nearby and ready for their performance.

After a street performance take pictures of every car in the lot even if you are in the biggest mall in your town. These pictures will allow an investigator to help find the perpetrators and maybe weed out some of the silent players that are more valuable to know about than the stalkers. The stalkers are most likely just individuals who are approached and want to work for cash or the fantasy of being james bond.

Handy tools for fighting back

computer note book
Digital recorder capable of recording up to seven hours
digital camera
upload everything to a stalker website set up by you, try not to jeapardize other sites when revealing names and places. My personal favorite is msn groups

There just might be an enemy of the stalkers out there and providing this information would help expose their network and make them very nervous. Applying the pressure back at them, creating the uncertainty that they desire you to have.

Yours Truly
Dean Ray

NO R.C.M.P will investigate my claims
Break in report updated...
Lois Sheplawy
-noticed a Icecream pail lid with a chain sitting on it in her room near the door . noon December 12 2004. picture has been taken with disposable camera.

(anything happens use event number 04300763. A file has been made when trying to find out what happened to the satelite Bell expressview.)


Dean Ray
- noticed two finishing nails in bedroom closest to kitchen. Nails located on Eastern wall towards elevator. A hook was screwed into the ceiling very close to Eastern wall and the wall which has the window. December 13 2004

Note that apartment was painted and it is impossible for the nails to be left behind. Landlord specifically noted we are only allowed to use one wall and Lois Sheplawy chose the living room eastern wall.

Dean Ray
-noticed more holes peppered throughout the apartment. Extreme amounts of nail damage in the bedroom nearest the kitchen. 2004 DEC 14

Lois Sheplawy
-noticed religious tapes erased, broken door on closet, roll of quarters stolen
2005 may 04

Lois Sheplawy
-noticed dish washing soap drained faster than usual 2005 may 4

David R. Amos

Sent by fax November 1, 2003


J. Michael Wiggins, Acting Assistant
Attorney General for Civil Rights and
William H. Jordan his counsel
C/O Steven H. Rosenbaum, Chief
Mellie H. Nelson, Deputy Chief
Andrew J. Barrick, Attorney
Special Litigation Section
Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 66400
Washington, D.C. 20035-6400
Phone (202) 514-6249
Fax (202) 514-6273

Hey,


Lets just say that I know a little about you Federalists and you know a lot about Mr. Ashcroft and his BUDDYS. Both Mr. Wiggins and Mr. Gordon would have a hard time convincing me that they don’t know Bob Barr or Alan Dershowitz. I find you good old boys from Atlanta just as interesting as the bluebloods and the Irish Catholics from Beantown. I am more than willing to argrue in court with y’all  Y’all of you should start acting within the scope of your employment and enforce the federal civil rights statutes, in particular the area you label as number two. Perhaps you should remind Mr. Kunicich of the past doings in his home State before he attempts to oversee the bad acting federal law enforcement teams. I am forwarding a copy of this letter to his lady-friend/lawyer and to the Judiciary Committee. 


I will also present to the Judiciary Committee some of the actual wiretap tapes that are mentioned throughout the documents. First I must inform the people recorded on the tapes that their civil rights have been violated and that I did everything I could to protect their rights while trying to bring the truth into view. Some of the tapes were actually filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire for a period of three days. Everybody knows that the U.S. District court clerk is a liar. The answer was filed in a timely fashion and on a different date than the clerk claimed. The filing that was returned will be used as evidence in litigation against the USA within a very righteous complaint even if I do say so myself. 


As you can see, within the attached documents I did everything I could to make the many law enforcement authorities do their job. Now I will simply take it to the people. Maybe they can fix the problem with the jury box and the ballot box. For what it is worth, I sincerely believe that every representative should run as an independent and vote only in the side of the best interests of their own constituents. All members of congress should only be allowed to have that seat for one term. 


It appears that one term in congress has the potential to corrupt even the best of us. To me, speaking for the people should be an honourable duty and not a vocation. Politicians should be allowed to make their point then go back to living in the real world and allow others to speak. Why have someone such as evil old J. Strom Thruman or drunken Ted Kennedy represent us forever when there are so many other decent folks without blood on their hands who could do the job much more diligently? As for the jury box I will speak plainly to them in order to prove my own point. I cannot vote nor do I want to. I would never wish to be a politician I am a private person that will not hesitate to defend my kin from anyone who attacks them or their interests. I speak for myself and my Clan Pro Se. That is my duty. Your duty is to protect the federal civil rights of all the people including me. I have the same rights as anyone else under Tittle 42. Government lawyers are not above the law nor are they immune from prosecution if they do not act within the scope of their employment. If you disagree say so. I will not hesitate to argue it with you in front of a jury.


The following I have gleaned from your website. May I suggest you start asking the various law enforcement agencies some hard questions on my behalf. 


“The Special Litigation Section enforces federal civil rights statutes in four major areas: (1) conditions of institutional confinement; (2) law enforcement misconduct; (3) access to reproductive health facilities and places of religious worship; and (4) protection of institutionalized persons' religious exercise rights.”


“Law Enforcement Misconduct. The Special Litigation Section enforces the police misconduct provision of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, which authorizes the Attorney General to seek equitable and declaratory relief to redress a pattern or practice of illegal conduct by law enforcement agencies or agencies responsible for the administration of juvenile justice. 

The Section also enforces the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, which authorizes the Attorney General to initiate civil litigation to remedy a pattern or practice of discrimination based on race, color national origin, gender or religion involving services by law enforcement agencies receiving financial assistance from the Department of Justice.


The Section has successfully engaged in resolving and investigating allegations against police departments by taking a cooperative approach. Under 42 U.S.C. § 14141, the Attorney General is authorized to file lawsuits seeking court orders to reform police departments engaging in a pattern or practice of violating citizens' federal rights. The Section is continuing investigations and negotiations with a number of cities. The Cincinnati Police investigation recently reached a settlement and investigations were opened into several other departments.


The Cincinnati settlement agreement is an example of the success of the Section's approach to investigations of police departments. In April 2001, the City of Cincinnati was literally and figuratively smoldering in the wake of riots touched off by community reaction to a number of controversial police shootings. 


One year later, Attorney General Ashcroft presided over the signing ceremony for an agreement between the Department of Justice and the City of Cincinnati that implemented significant reforms with respect to uses of force by the Cincinnati Police Department. Moreover, by engaging in a collaborative negotiation process with the City, the police, and community groups, the Department of Justice agreement will be jointly monitored and enforced along with a separate agreement among the community groups and the City. This unique and historic arrangement achieved real reform without the need for protracted litigation or a consent decree. It reflected the Section's desire to help fix the problems in Cincinnati. 


In addition to these agreements, the Section continues to ensure implementation of consent decrees with the police departments of Steubenville, Ohio and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In United States v. City of Steubenville (S.D. Ohio), the Section filed its complaint and a consent decree resolving our claims of excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, and related management failures in 1997. 

The Section continues to monitor compliance with the decree. The city attorney and others have noted the improvements in the police department since entry of the decree in press reports. The Section continues to review the regular reports filed by the local monitor. In United States v. City of Pittsburgh (W.D. Penn.), the court entered a consent decree resolving the Section's claims of excessive force, false arrests, improper searches and seizures, and related management failures in 1997. The Section is monitoring compliance with the consent decree. This includes a regular review of the auditor's report on compliance with the consent decree.” 


Methinks it high time the Feds start taking a serious look at Massachusetts. The window dressing of the present Judiciary Committee investigations is merely a mask of virtue over the face of evil. Doesn’t anybody realize that Senator Kerry and Bill Delahunt were both State District Attorneys when a lot of this shit went down? They both should have asked many questions of the State and Federal Authorities a very long time ago. If you do not think that there is a cover up then you should have your youngest child read real slow to you the U.S Attorney’s, Michael J. Sullivan, “Ex Parte” statement about it and then Judge Carey’s judgments the following month. Trust me you are already mentioned in my true story about these matters. You choose how you wish to be remembered. The tale is far more interesting than Michael Fredrickson’s fictional renditions of the facts. I do bear Witness for the Dead and I do possess a Cinderella Affidavit that implicates the Secret Service in the conspiracy to cover-up crimes. 


One way or another, I will 

 

Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave
Milton, MA 02186


P.S. I would prefer you stood with me. After all I am just an Alien Biker acting as a Court Jester when my much neglected real job is Mr. Mom. I just went under cover.

David R. Amos

Clark Kent Ervin November 12, 2003
Acting Inspector General of
the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Washington, D.C. 20528

Sir, 


Need I remind you of Rule 9 of the Code of Ethics hereto attached. May I strongly suggest that you waltz around the various departments of the DHS, drop my name and ask a few questions. W. Ralph Basham , Director, United States Secret Service, would be a good place to start. After all it was he who sent the Secret Service to see me to investigate false allegations but I bet that it was Mr. Webster who had an influence on their not investigating Bank Fraud. The recent developments in Boston with regards to the SEC and Putnam Investments must be great concern to the FEDS. Why else would they be calling me now after ignoring me for so long? Perhaps you should go talk to Eduardo Aguirre, Jr. about his fellas investigating me. I would like to know why the General Counsel of the DHS has not responded to my letter. Is he waiting the full six months like H. Marshall Jarrett did? November the 20th is the last day for your boss Attorney General Ashcroft to respond to me. After that date I can complain of him as an individual. Trust that I shall. I also suggest that you read the enclosed documents and listen to the tape, then apply your ethics while you ask yourself what you would do if you were me. Please surprise me and become the first Inspector General and in fact the first civil servant that acted within the scope of his employment.


Please find enclosed an exact copy of a letter sent to every U.S. Attorney in the USA just prior to the malicious side show held before Judge Borenstein in Norfolk Superior Court on September 29th. I suspect the recent developments about the SEC and the FBI in Beantown have caused him to delay his judgments of long delayed motions that he had no jurisdiction to hear. He need not be advised as to whether or not to dismiss Prima Facia complaints that belong in federal court. The irrefutable evidence supporting the allegations were filed and served with the complaints. He knew the truth when he read what remained of the dockets. The clerks’ actions in all courts were evil. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.

Cya’ll in Court
David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186

Davir R. Amos

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: info@pogo.org ; elliot.gerson@aspeninstitute.org ; pat.zindulka@aspeninstitute.org ; peter. reiling@aspeninstitute.org ; clark.ervin@aspeninstitute.org
Cc: brian@questionsquestions.net ; plough@ploughshares.ca ; moto maniac ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; backtalk@motherjones.com ; Wes Penre@Illuminati News.com ; tpalmer@cato.org ; ghealy@cato.org ; david@davidakin.com ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ; INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ; Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ; Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ; Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:30 AM
Subject: I just left voicemail for Jim Spiegelman


Hey Fellas


I have picked you Mr. Gerson to send exactly the same material that I sent to two Solicitor Generals last year before I ran for Parliament in Canada. I am certain that material caused Theodore Olson to quit his job and your brand new fellow, Clark Kent Erwin to get the boot from his job right after the last Yankee election. 


Obviously I picked you because of your own bragging. There is no need for me to expand upon things that you and I know to be true. It is merely my task to prove to the world that you are well aware of my concerns and allegations. Then if you and your Association does nothing to uphold the public trust, I will make it my best effort to embarrass you all in court in front of a jury of my peers. You people claim to inspire people to ethical leaders? I say Bullshit. What say you?


Say Hey to Superman for me. Will ya? Yea I know I just did but he likes to keep everything in confidence while his cohorts keep me falsely imprisoned. However I plan to call him to testify during my pending criminal trial as I have the right to do. I should be very interesting to see if he takes the fifth.


David R. Amos


"Elliot Gerson is responsible for the Aspen Institute's seminars, including the Executive Seminar, topical and custom seminars, and those offered in the Society of Fellows and Socrates programs. He also manages the Institute's public programs and activities, including the Aspen Ideas Festival. He is a graduate of Harvard College, Oxford University, where he was a Rhodes Scholar, and Yale Law School. As American Secretary of the Rhodes Trust, he manages the U.S. Rhodes Scholarships and is an advisor to the Mandela Rhodes Foundation in Cape Town, which focuses on African higher education and leadership. He was a U. S. Supreme Court clerk and has had a career including the practice of law, executive positions in state and federal government and a presidential campaign, president of leading insurance and healthcare companies, and service on many non-profit boards, especially in the arts."


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: jim.spiegelman@aspeninstitute.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 8:52 AM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: backtalk@motherjones.com
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 3:58 PM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: tpalmer@cato.org
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 6:32 PM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: dante17678@hotmail.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 10:18 AM
Subject: Fw: This is going to get interesting

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: rjvattuone@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2005 9:59 AM
Subject: This is going to get interesting

Hey Richard

Thanks for calling me back the other day. Here is my number in Boston 617 698-6549. I will be hitting the road shortly and I will be sending out to you hard copy of what I am sending to Scott Daruty. However there is a great deal more you should know ASAP. I am involved against the biggest and baddest of them all and we all know they play for keeps. It is important that you know much and have evidence of it in order to protect yourself. I know they moniter my phone calls and I have know doubt that they listen to the Canadain Cell as well. The fact that you spoke to me honestly and openly puts you in jeopardy. If you had acted like most lawyers, the bastards would leave you alone. If you come to my aid, they will attack you. Trust me it has happened before and I will send proof of it in the following emails. Some contain the Tiffs I mentioned I am curious to see if they get through AOL system. I hack been blocked by them in the past. I have not heard from Barry Bachrach since just after he warned me that the FBI was about to pounce on me on Oct 1st. It seems they have him running scared. I must do my best to protect honest men..

The following is what I just posted but it seems Bill Gates does not allow Tiff files in his sites so I will forward it to you to support what I said is true. Answer this email if and when you get it an I will send some others if you wish. However I think it would be better not to use AOL. As I said just get one in Yahoo or Hotmail they work better and are free.

From: motomaniac in response to Message 1 Sent: 3/27/2005 9:21 AM

In defense of Bobby Fischer I must say that he is just another man like me. He has his strengths and his weaknesses. Just like me. One particular forte of his, the amazing ability to play a game very well thrust him into the limelight for the whole wide world to study and examine his every move. More importantly I believe his fame caused him to become a pawn in the big big game. Although he had his right to privacy, the whole world dogged at his heels and critized his every action as a man. The Masters of War obviously tried use him to their advantage during the Cold War. He is not a stateman or a lawyer. He is simply a free thinking individual who has every right to speak his mind particularly after he has suffered through hell just because he plays chess so very well.

I say judge not lest ye be judged and mind your own mouth about things you do not know all the details of. I am far more outspoken than Bobby ever was and yet you have never even heard of my name. It is because the corporate controlled media is not permited to do so. I am nobody with any special talent that had caused me to be thrown into public scrutiny before I was compelled to speak out as Bobby has done. I do not have to agree or disagree with his every word over the years to understand his meaning and his troubles. That said, in all honesty it would behoove us both if his lawyer would listen to me and employ Bobby's fame to expose the truth of all that we say.

I am am not a perfect person and neither is Bobby. I do not know him nor do I judge him. Yet I do agree with with his standing in defense of his freedom. The Chessmaster has every right to spout off against the Masters of War because they have offended him greatly. It is for his attorney to weed out the truth and evidence of his convictions and present it in court in order to seek relief on his client's behalf. A jury of his peers will decide the truth of his matters not us bloggers without veiwing and hearing all the evidence. Forget what you may glean from the media. The information is controlled and slanted against him. Listen to what his lawyer says and what is used in arguement against him on the public record. Do not hold court in the media just gossip about things you know are true in order for the courts to act properly in the public interest.

Bobby has paid the devil his due and done time in his jails. It is time for him to seek relief. I have as well. I was summoned to jail in the USA while running for Parliament in Canada and held under the charges of "other". I will not want allow myself to be judged on just one particular act or deed. My criminal trial in the USA is coming very soon. I will have lots to say.

It is the average of all our days and deeds that speaks of us as the men we are. Like any game, it is what happens in the end that counts. Sometimes sacrifices must be made and sometimes mistakes are made. However once the word "checkmate" is declared, it is all over but the crying as long as we play by the rules and the fat lady sings in tune. I am more than happy to provide to Mr. Vattuone my evidence of much public corruption in order to support Bobby's lawsuit against the USA. It is high time the the Masters of War paid the fiddler and then be compelled to dance to a different tune as we make them fall on their own sword. No one is above the law. The public trust must be upheld or we are all losers in the the big big game. Forget Bobby and chess for a minute and listen to what he is saying through his attorney. I applaud is efforts in support of Bobby and his legal matters. I hope we get on like a house on fire. Any enemy of my foe should be a friend of mine. Bobby lawyer is your neighbor listen to him and then speak out to protect your own civil rights. What happened to Bobby and I could happen to you next. Get it?

If anyone wishes to challenge what I have said, respond to this message with a email account that can hold of 25 megs of attachments. I will send you Tiff files of legal documents etc. that will take you down path of of the Garden of Good and Evil that everybody knows is true. I simply made it a point to prove it. My particular forte that helped accomplish such a necessary task is that I am more stubburn than a pig, meaner than a snake and smarter than the average bear. Much to my chagrin, I am just an average sort of chess player and have much to learn from Bobby in that regard but I maintain that chess is just a game. Bobby was compelled to play a far more serious and deadly game just because of his love of a game. I do recognize his talent but my hat is off to him because of what he did and stood for as a man not a chess player. In regards to his legal actions methinks I can teach his attorney a trick or two of mine.

If anyone has any questions here is my phone number. 506 434-1379 Feel free to argue me and stress test my ethics to the max. It is your freedom as well as my own that I am protecting. I think anyone has the right to question my motives. I speak plainly and do not hide my identity. Integrity does not need a mask to hide behind. However men like John Ashcroft and all his cohorts need jails to cage honest men who speak their mind about their masks of virtue.

Bobby is just one man of many. His is fortunate that he is famous. Iceland would not do such things on behalf of the likes of me and many others. However Canada or Japan or whatever would do the same against me to support President Bush in a New York minute. In fact it already happened. The one file I have attached is the reason Clark Kent Ervin got fired immediately after the recent election. He long along proved to me that he was not interested in Truth Justice and the American Way and in fact he is a dumb as a post. I will wager I could beat him at chess. I know I played him like a fiddle as a lawyer and that is his game of choice. It was really to funny to me the advice he offered to others as he entered into the Aspen Crowd of nasty dudes. I feel the need to quote him. Many a govenment lawyer will understand why I am busting my gut laughing. I hope Bobby's lawyer does too.

Lauren Robinson POGO Fellow " Any advice for your fellow public servants?"

Clark Kent Ervin "Well, just do your job and let the political chips fall where they may. Unless your're willing to do that, it seems to me you shouldn't take the job in the first place."

My answer to his remark is No Shit Sherlock. The former Inspector General can expect a rather profound civil lawsuit. He must argue me Pro Se or a at least without government assistance on his behalf because he failed to act within the scope of his employment and he is now out of the job.

David Raymond Amos

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
 
 

For the record Jeannah Barry did forward his apology to you in January after I forced him to get honest fast.

Sep 20, 2006 at 2:37 AM
David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
To: jeanfomeara@yahoo.com, myson333@yahoo.com


David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 15:53:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: The answer to your dumb question is easy Barry Baby
To: BBACHRACH@bowditch.com, bbixby@burnslev.com, drosenblatt@burnslev.com,
thomas.gatzunis@state.ma.us, Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us,
lcampenella@ledger.com, Kandalaw@mindspring.com, jmurray@ibc.ca,
tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com, dwatch@web.net, duffy@ctv.ca,
trvl@hotmail.com, Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us, fbinhct@leo.gov
CC: wickedwanda3@adelphia.net, thee_sandman@hotmail.com, mchayday@mta.ca,
lemisanthrope@hotmail.com, desserud@unbsj.ca,
bernard.miller@mcinnescooper.com, dmnorman@coxhanson.ca,
general@pub.nb.ca, bryan.corbett@ualberta.ca, mcfaul@hoover.stanford.edu,
mayor@ci.boston.ma.us, patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov,
Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov, stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com,
governorlynch@nh.gov, lrikleen@bowditch.com

       Both my wife and I were foolish is expect to see that lawyers would insure that justice is served. You smiling bastards serve yourselves not the law you swore to uphold. Rest assured Barry Baby I will employ many of your own words to bust you in front of your brothers of the bar before I sue your nasty arse and that of your pal Norfolk County Deputy Sheriff Robert F. O'Meara and his flock of corrupt legal cronies.
        I have no problem whatsoever deleting your email from the list as I tell the truth about you. In the mean time go cry a river to you pal Senator Arlen Specter. Methinks he may call you in a day or two. After all you did swear you sent the wiretap tapes to him did you not? Well he claims that you didn't? My problem is I know that you are both corrupt as hell thus one lawyer will lie and the other will swear to it EH?
                                                                   Veritas Vincit
                                                                     David Raymond Amos
 
P.S. Guess who is forwarding this email everywhere and then posting it in a Blog?
                                                              
                                                        

"Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com> wrote:
Subject: RE: Some question
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:48:54 -0500
From: "Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com>
To: "David Amos"<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>,
"Jean F O'Meara"<Jean.F.O'Meara@aexp.com>

i don't recall ever calling you a liar. if you would like me to send the wiretaps to congress i will. i invited you to sue me because you said you were going to. who in congress would you like to send them to. how did i upset jean on 1/11.  i will remove myself as your attorney at your request. i suggest we all cool off and have a talk.you and jean should be talking. remember this all started when i simply passed on a message to you from i think it was an ftc lawyer. you got pissed at me. and it went downhill from there. frankly that was an incredibly trying time for me. alot has been going on and i have been busy on all fronts. i find email a poor way to communicate, because, particularly i am terse. with respect to the murder. this is what was reported to my secretary and she was very upset. i didn't take it as true but i have to ask to find out what is going on. i believe you never said that once you told me you didn't. if i took any stock in it do you think i would have privately written you to ask. you then publish it to many people, it wasn't me. i was keeping it between you and me and i would have been satisfied with your answer.  with respect to the norfolk case, i had to continue it. i did not think it would upset you. i had to be in south carolina and was for last week. but let me be cloear. i have never called you a liar. one thing i have learned, is you don't lie. you are an honorable man. second, my reaction came in the midst of your angry email to me which is one among many where i have taken alot of shit from people for trying to help on my dime. do i read before i write, probably not, i have a bad habit of talking first and then regretting some of the things i say.
anyway, i believe you got mad at me for passing on the ftc communication i had. i didn't expect that. i regret that i have failed miserably in helping you and your family, but i don't think i am the enemy or that i have aligned with the enemy. anyway, i in my heart don't believe i am or should be considered your enemy. maybe we can move forward, maybe we can't. but you and jean should talk. i don't believe i have said anything to jean to interfere with your relationship. could you point out where i called you a liar. if i did, i didn't intend to and apologize. one thing i know, is that you are not a liar.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 8:31 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE: Some question

    Don't this shit just piss me off. You send one sensible email and then slam me with the next. Don't you read before you write?  They write Country and Western songs about this shit don't they? That is what kind of shit this is. In legal terms it is called upholding the law. Even Georgey Boy Bush ain't above it even though he claims otherwise.    
   You refuse to send the wiretap tapes to Congress, call me a liar, invite me to sue you and tell me not to email you anymore. I don't I just sit back and keep on running for Parliament in order to corner the crooks in Canada in order to keep my dumb self righteous arse out of jail. Then you call and email me weeks later and say that I threatened your murder and then expect me not to respond to save my own arse from more false allegations?
      I repeat I told tou to rermove yourself as my atttorney in Dorchester District Court ONLY and see that you and the ADA McDonnell send a total of 18 original wiretap tapes you two have in your possession to Congress ASAP. I will be filing many more in Federal Court up here in Canada as double check to help me to impeach your Yankee President..
       What you and my wife have decided to do in Norfolk Probate Court is between you two for now. She won't speak to me particularly after you called her on Jan 11th and upset her even further.
      Rest assured I am sending a Hell of an email to you soon. Say hey to Deputy Dog and my wife, his sister for me will ya?

"Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com> wrote:
david what is this shit, and why on a personal email that i copy you to ask a question do you copy the world. i asked a question because that is what nancy was told. if i truly thought you were threatening me, would i ask/ i sent the email to find out what was going on. give me a break will ya.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:13 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Cc: Kandalaw@mindspring.com; fbinhct@leo.gov; josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us; info@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dpm@pm.gc.ca; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net
Subject: Re: Some question

   What is this shit? Are you trying to claim that I am threatening you now? Didn't you instruct me not to email you anymore but to sue you instead. Why have you not recognized my standing in Norfolk Probate Court? Have you withdrawn as my attorney in dorchester district Court yet? I did file a pre trial memorandum in the Norfolk Probate matter too. The hearing that was slated to go off yesterday was not the trial It was only a hearing about the evidence to be argued when the matter eventually does come to trial. Until then nothing counts if all parties including me are not served the various motions etc. Don't ya think we should have received the petition to start the matter in the first place? What I demand to know right now is has Triple M Movers auctioned off my bikes, that of my friends and the kids beds etc while I am awaiting a trial..
      Whoever called you from Fidelity is a flat out liar. I called a lawyer who claimed he was named Campell. I was demanding that he intervene in the matter to protect his company's interests  I had talked to him way back in August about the illegal sale of the house. His company was listed on the Hud forms as the title insurance company. I suggested then that they talk to you before Jean and the kids were thrown into the street. It seems that they may have. When I called him back yesterday he immediately started making jokes about you and Indian crap etc, while I only wanted to talk about the house and the title tranfer long before the mortgage discharge was registered in July.. Apparently he did not think I knew that his boss the General Counsel in Florida was a former underling of John Ascroft and it appeared he figured we screwed as of yesterday. Anyway I told him I would be sending him an exact copy of the same wiretap tape that everyone else received that does involve the FBI's cover up of the murders Whitey Bulger did. When you told me to sue you I demanded that you send the 9 wiretap tapes that you hold in your possession to the FBI in order for them to be sent off to Conress before Alberto Gonzales speaks before the Judicary committee. In response you call me a liar and tell me not to cantact you to sue you instead? Your wish is my command. Why you have chosen to stand  with people such as Kerstein, L:apointe and Troccoli against me has only one explanation. Obviously Deputy Dog talks to more people tham Jean and I do. Why?

"Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com> wrote:
Dear david
My secretary got a disturbing phone call which she just revealed to me.  Apparently you called fidelity and among other things indicated that you were coming down to take care of the crooks in norfolk and something about my murder.  Please explain what is going on.  Barry
Communications from our firm may contain or incorporate federal tax advice.  Under recently promulgated US Internal Revenue Service standards (Circular 230), we are required to inform you that only formal, written tax opinions meeting the requirements of Circular 230 may be relied upon by taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties.  Accordingly, this communication is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.

This e-mail message is generated from the law firm of Bowditch & Dewey, LLP and contains information that is confidential and may be privileged as an attorney/client communication or as attorney work product. The information is intended to be disclosed solely to the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of  this email information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete it from your computer system. For more information about Bowditch & Dewey, please visit our web site at
www.bowditch.com
 
"Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com> wrote:
 
Subject: RE: phone call from Barry On Jan 11
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:30:17 -0500
From: "Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com>
To: "David Amos"<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>

i am not a liar. and i won't be called a liar by the likes of you.you don't want me to continue the trial . so i didn't. don't call me a liar.  i was trying to move the trial because i have to be in federal court in south carolina. but smart guy that you are, you complained and didn't want it continued. read your email. c ya in court dave.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:12 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE: phone call from Barry On Jan 11

Liar I received no call from you Barry and Jean supports the fact that we have not talked. If she has discharged you she does not state it in the email you just forwarded to me. It looks to me that you are bailing out on my wife once again to protect your own arse. I will look foward to meeting you in federal court. You saw the HUD forms Kerstein sent to you. What you did not see was the the fraudulent mortgage discharge filed in the registry of Deeds one month later. Read the small print Title 18 1001 and 1010 holds true for you and your support of the fraud. the same thing happened in the Beach house matter that is why you did not wish to see my proof of the Title V fraus cover up EH? Say hey to rikleen for me will YA and i will say hey to your senior partners and some Indians you know. Rmeber when we last met I brought up the topic of the Fake Left? Wasn't I looking at you kinda hard?.

"Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com> wrote:
 
David and jean, I am sorry things did not work out. I am not continuing
the trial as you directed. Also, based on communications I will be
filing a motion to withdraw tomorrow. Best of luck to you. Barry b.

"Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com> wrote:
 
Subject: RE: phone call from Barry On Jan 11
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:27:49 -0500
From: "Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com>
To: "David Amos"<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>,
"Jean F O'Meara"<>

c ya in court dave. 
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 7:51 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.; Kandalaw@mindspring.com; fbinhct@leo.gov; josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca; alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us; info@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dpm@pm.gc.ca; ted.tax@justice.gc.ca; Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca
Cc: lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US; Rep.MichaelMoran@Hou.State.MA.US; canada@canadianembassy.org; brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca; Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca; racing.commission@state.ma.us; dwatch@web.net; general.info@thomson.com; wickedwanda3@adelphia.net; ombud@globe.com; dan@djflynn.com; adams_sammon@msn.com; tracy.parsons@pcparty.org; Harper.S@parl.gc.ca; ahamilton@casselsbrock.com; vote@montesolberg.com; vote4pat@rogers.com; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca; johncarty@ndp.ca; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca; Martin.P@parl.gc.ca; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca; graham@grahamsteele.ca; guyjl@rushcomm.ca; michael.baker@ns.sympatico.ca; jeff.mockler@gnb.ca; jacques.sabourin@justice.gc.ca; justice@gov.nl.ca; pduchastel@gmail.com; marc.hasbani@npd.qc.ca; Pettigrew.P@parl.gc.ca; maggie.trudel-maggiore@international.gc.ca; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca; info@apex.gc.ca; carp@50plus.com
Subject: RE: phone call from Barry On Jan 11

Enough is enough I will be filing a motion to oppose your withdrawal and demand that I will be allowed to argue you after the purported malicious warrant for my arrest in Dorchester District Court is revoked. If the court allows you to support it own wrongs we will meet in Federal Court. That is no threat that is a promise. go cry a river to Cynthia Hogue of the FTC whom you clearly stated I threatened or better yet the dumb as a post Rich Delmar, the lawyer for the Inspector General of the Treasury Dept. I will have him call you sometime soon. Before you are allowed to withdraw in my matter npw before Dorchester District Court. Please forward the nine wiretap tapes in your possession to the FBI ASAP before the hearings in Congress begin that were inspired by Bush's actions would be nice. I showed the tapes i gave to the Suffolk county DA to the Police commission in New Brunswick first with Jean and a lawyer present. As you know I am just a dumb piheaded Maritimer and  not an officer of the court like you are or a law enforcement authority that you are afraid off so do not send them to me or my wife. Say hey to your buddy Alcia S. McDonnell and tell her to go find hers. I have a tape of her underling admitting she recived your own nine wire tap tapes Tell her to find themand sent them to the FBI as well. Everybody wacthed her on Oct 1st 2004 put them in those funny envelopes with the strings and buttons before she lied about me threatening our former  neighbor Judge Coffey in order to  have me falsely imprisoned. Ask the Canadian diplomat Josie Maguire she supported the malice. Please explain to me real slow sometime why you did not come to court that first day in October of 2004 as you had promised Barry.

bob <wickedwanda3@adelphia.net> wrote:
 
From: "bob"<wickedwanda3@adelphia.net>
To: "David Amos"<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Mr. Turner you were not serious about Free Trade when you argued Mulroney in 1988. Were you?
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:50:54 -0800

You fired Barry,,,,,,,,,,,,,,didn't look that way to me.It looked like he finally told you to go take a shit for yourself.Not bad.Aguy doing it for FREE, and you screwed that up. And for the record, Kerstien was not my lawyer. He was appointed by the court.He did not represent anyone of us, smart guy.One more thing,,,,,,,,,why do you keep avoiding the question,,,,,,,,,why didn't you buy the houses ? Are you ever going to answer that one, with all your bullshit slinging.Guess you're going to be real busy in court. The "I'm going to sue you" list is getting bigger and bigger.Where am I on that list ? Just want to mark that day on my calender.I'm still waiting for those papers that were filed in court on Jan. 3rd. Guess the USPC is still screwing with the mail. Oh well,,G'day Dayve
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:20 AM
Subject: Mr. Turner you were not serious about Free Trade when you argued Mulroney in 1988. Were you?

Hey
     If you were a serious man Mr. Turner many ethical lawyers within your law firm and your former party which quickly going down the tubes would have come to my assistance by now. EH? Why were you so worried about Russian elections but seem to ignore the nonsense that is upon us right now? I was born here you were not but wouldn't it be interesting if it were the Bloc in the end that protected the Sovereignty and the Rights of all Canadians from Yankees before Quebec separates from my native land. Do you think any of the ladies of Bloc who receive this particular email will understand the ramifications of it? Neither do I but many other ordinary folk will someday. It is plain as the nose on you face Landslide Annie just bailed on Humpty Dumpty and is attempting to appear ethical before she loses her seat in Parliament and I sue her as an individual. Press print on the the attached Tiff file to see why if you do  not already know.
      Methinks you Mr. turner are just another corrupt political lawyer who says one thing and does another. I think the same of you Mr. Lucien Bouchard What say you oh ye oh so honourable sirs? I truly believe the word integrity means less than nothing ot any member of the bar. I have gone to great lengths to prove that simple fact is true before I sue the Crown  I will send you two similiar hard copy of the same material your old friends Brian Mulroney and Jean Chretien received before I went into a Yankee jail last year for the benefit of George W. Bush and met the Canadian Consulate there and they supported to false allegations made against me to this very day. Unless you two dudes decide to call me back very soon and somehow prove your integrity to me I will assume that my assestment of your characters is correct. If you don't appreciate it, sue me in fact, I Double Dog Dare Ya too. Thus far not one lawyer has taken me up on that simple challeng. ask yourselves why if you wish to play as dumb as the Newfy Johnny Crosbie.  
       Just so ya know as soon as the Yankee Attorney General Alberto Gonzales agreed to testify before the Senate Commitee in Washington about Bush's false claim that he had the Consitutional Right to ignore the Fourth Amendment, I fired my very incompetant Yankee attorney, Barry Bachrach in the matter now before Dorchester District Court but he still speaks for my wife in Probate court as I argue him and my other opponents in order to protect my own rights and interests and that of my two minor children. wheras he and I were all done I demanded that Bachrach send the nine original wiretap tapes in his possession to the FBI and on to Congress ASAP. I also suggested that he inform the Suffolk County District Attorney in Boston who had me falsely imprisoned last year to go find the nine other wiretap tapes that they have stashed away somewhere. I gave the tapes to the DA in court in front of many witnesses on Sept 3rd 2004. Bachrach refused and invited me to sue him. Rest assured I will. He knows for a fact that I am a man of my word and I have many more wisretap tapes as well if he has lost his too. I have many in Canada I will use against the Crown in short order not long after this wicked election is over. I also called several Yankee Senators last week who have had a copy of wiretap tape # 139 in particular for over two years and told them I will be suing them too someday soon.
                                                               Veritas Vincit
                                                                   David Raymond Amos
 
P.S. Say hello to the dumbest lawyer on the planet. The Yankee's  name is Neil M. Kerstein. I have a tape of him inside my home inviting me to sue him in federal court after he and the Milton Town Cops broke into my home with the Assistance of his client Norfolk County Sheriff Deputy Dog Robert F. O'Meara. It was done without a warrant or due process of law on June 16th 2004. While this damned Yankee was inside my home my attorney at the time, Barry Bachrach called Kerstein and talked to him on my phone in front of witnesses and asked him to leave my home imediately and still the dumb bastard refused. Next week Kerstein and his clients are going to auction off my property and are are bragging about it while the matter involving my possessions is still in litigation and I am a named respondent they have chosen to ignore for six months. Tell me that ain't dumb.
      Kerstein and I will argue another very important tape in federal court. Here is the transcript of it.  It was voicemail sent to us on month before while I was preparing to come home and run for Parliament just before Belinda Stronach crossed the floor and saved Humpty Dumpty's very corrupt government for a little while at least. In August I was forced by Yankees to come home and prepare to sue the Crown. I could not defend my Clan if I were falsely imprisoned again.
 
O’MEARA/AMOS
Voicemail from John Jenney, Norfolk Probate Court 5/12/05
Message for Jean O’Meara. Jean this is John Jenney. Its 12;30 on the ah, on Thursday.
Ah, Jean, there is no bond filed. I checked the file. I checked the court. There is no bond filed. A warrant never issued on the ah on the appointment of Neil Kerstein as Commissioner. He should have filed one.
I think you should get a lawyer and tell him or her that, that there is nothing…that the the warrant never issued before the sale. Does does does that make it defective? So I think that it probably does.
Ah. But I just want to put this on the record that at 12:30 on May 12th there is no bond on file here by Neil Kerstein and therefore the warrant to sell the property never issued. It is still in the file.
Ah my number is 781 830 1217. This is John Jenney. Bye.
                                                                    
David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:14:23 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: We have about one week to stop Harper in his tracks and put the other party leaders in their place
To: ed@edfast.ca, sashley-pryce@greenparty.ca, a-t-s@telus.net,
rgebert@shaw.ca
CC: vote@victoews.com, provencherliberal@mts.net, jgibson@greenparty.ca,
candidates@cbc.ca

Hey
       Just in case you don't think i am for real. here is what little the CBC says of me.
       Rest assured I don't care if my name does not ring a bell with Wes Penner it seems very familiar to me. I don't care about the spit and chew between the Ndp and the liberal you humpty Dumpty just canned. I know paul martin is whorse than everyone ask the ghosts who partook of tainted blood or the others who are still suffering and waiting for the long liberal promise of relief. Methinks tainted blood has killed more Canadians in Toronto than guns ever did. What say you?
   Besides all that the not withstanding clause is part of the Charter a PM cannot change it on a whim to gain a vote or two when hating legal guns did not garner him enough to regain some ground anymore tha George Boy Bush can say he has a Consitutional right to violate the Fourth amendment.. One thing for certain the talk of necessary ethical behaviour is interesting to say the least coming from incumbents who cannot be held accountable right now unless someone like me drags them into a court of law. Should I say they are full of Bullshit or just sue them or both since none of you quite likely never will? I think I may be the last true PC (Pissed Candidate) The crooked CBC can put that in their pipe and smoke it or inserted in their profile of me.
     I will try to call you all in order to prove my integrity first. If not Yahoo swears that the attached tif file is free of viruses.Just press print and protect your own rights and interests the best way you know how. I would be more than happy to argue Harper's lawyer buddy Ed Fast about this stuff ASAP but I know for a fact that the wannabe Attorney General Vic Toews ain't no better than the liberal crook Cotler he seeks to replace .No incumbent is about to act ethically now after they have all been ignoring me for two god damn years.
       All the Neo Conservative lawyers or anyone can call me a liar or sue I don't care as long as they put it in writing and sign their name to it like I do. That said perhaps they should call the little bible pounding aptly named lawyer Rob Moore before you may wish to call me. (506 434 1379) I ain't taking lawyers prisoner when I sue the Crown not too long after polling day.. It looks like I get to take on two Prime Ministers and their many unethical underlings for the price of one if a proud pigheaded Maritimer who is far from a defeatist gets his timing is spot on.
       Methinks the ghost of old Louis Riel is gleeful that I am embarassing the Hell out of a bunch old corrupt Upper Canadians like Humpty Dumpty and his pets Jacky Boy Layton, the wierd little Federal Party from just one Province and all their evil Yankee buddies  EH? Rest assured when a man such as I am is trying hard to impeach George W. Bush and his cohorts, Stevy Boy Harper ain't jackshit to me. After a little more than a week or so. I will not care much anymore for my fellow Canadian laments ab out the rampant corruption within our public service simply because the sheep get the government they deserve. I happy to be the lone wolf who loves to dog lawyers and torture them about their lack of integrity in order to get them to sue each other. Maybe some day some of them such as Humpty Dumpty will fall on their own sword. Paul Martin brags about how he upholds the Charter EH? Yea right it is just another lie from the mouth of one of canada;s most corrupt lawyers thats all.
       Good luck with your consciences tonight folks. I am gonna sleep like a baby and look forward to arguing Andy Baby Scott Humpty Dumpty's dumbest Cabinet Minister of all a couple of times in a few days.
                                                       Veritas Vincit
                                                            David Raymond Amos
                                                          

David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:50:28 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Here is some of what I was up to in Sussex last week after you had ducked out Rob Moore
To: eldonhunter4mp@nb.aibn.com, Moore.R@parl.gc.ca, pnphanratty@hotmail.com,
millett@canoemail.com, gthompson.nbsouthwest@nb.aibn.com,
stansmith@nb.aibn.com
 
Gregg Thompson                                                        January 10th, 2006
Member of Parliament
New Brunswick Southwest
 
Sir
           Mr. Thompson I am a constituent of the riding now known as New Brunswick Southwest. I am also the secretary for my friend, David Raymond Amos as he runs against the Cabinet Minister Andy Scott in the riding of Fredericton. Whereas you have spoken on my behalf in Parliament for well over a year, I must ask you a very important question for the benefit of my friend. Why didn’t you or any of your political party ask the 38th Parliament to question the false imprisonment of David Amos in October of 2004 in the USA and the malicious prosecution of him since that time. You know as well as I that Dave ran against your party’s local caucus leader Rob Moore in Fundy Royal in June of 2004. It was clearly impossible for him to be stalking a lawyer in the USA while running for Parliament in Canada. The lawyer who made false allegations against him claiming that she does not know him is still litigating against him to this very day. He has had the lawyer fired from three law firms thus far because of her many practiced wrongs against him and his family.
        The one of emails that the Americans are attempting to prosecute him about was sent to the Minister of Justice of the 37th Parliament first and has since been sent to every member of the 38th Parliament without one single response from anyone. Furthermore I know for a fact one other constituent has asked you this very same sort of question and provided you with a great deal of hard copy. You have not responded to her as of yet. I must ask why?
         Please give me an answer in writing before polling day so that many of my friends and I can decide as to whom that wishes to speak for us in the 39th Parliament understands the meaning of the word integrity. I know Dave does. That is why I am supporting him in his efforts to unseat our present Prime Minister Paul Martin and his party’s present government.
                                                          Yours Truly
                                                                        John M. Johnson
                                                                        1109 East Scotch Settlement Road
                                                                        Belleisle Creek, NB, E5P 1N5
                                                                        Phone 506 485 2578
 
                                       Certificate of Service
I, John M. Johnson, of Belleisle Creek certify that I have served this letter in hand to the Conservative MPs Gregg Thompson and Rob Moore on in front of many witnesses Jan10th, 2006. I have also provided a copy to Stanley Smith, Andrew Graham, Erik Millet, Eldon Hunter, Rob Moir and Patty Donovan. If they are not present I will send them a copy by first class mail ASAP.
                                                                              John M. Johnson
 
      Here is just one of the many emails that the Liberal, Green and and NDP party people running against Rob Moore and Gregg Thompson were trying hard to play dumb about last night. The incompetant opponents of the seated Blue Coats in New Brunswick who do not have anymore of a prayer of getting elected than I do thought I was pissed off when in fact I was having fun putting the Conservatives panties in a knot before I sue them. I just didn't wanted to be bothered by their pretense of being honestly concerned after the YoYos were way past too late in helping me stop Stevey Boy Harper from being our next Prime Minister. My battle is not with ordinary folks as I told the NDP Pesident Pat Hannratty last year. It is with corrupt Feds that he laments about but supports all the same.
 
           Just press print on the tiff (Yahoo promises no virus) and do with your newfound information what you will. Please have some fun and good luck unseating anyone. Government is a necessary evil but who says we have to send the same corrupt dudes back to keep playing their same old wicked old game?
      The biggest winner in this nonsense should be the NDP Party. They would lose less than twenty seats in return for a great many more if they would only be the first to grap the brass ring I am dangling in front of them. If someone else breaks the ice first on what the crooks such as Rooten Ralphie Goodale have been busy trying to keep covered up, second place won't count. However if Independents take my work and run with it Parliament would go though a true and very necessary change.
     Everybody talks the talk of ethics and integrity. However I have yet to meet another who will walk it. Everybody calls me crazy and yet they will not call me a liar. Ask your own conscience why that is. I knew the answer years ago. No doubt you do too or you wouldn't be trying to get elected would ya? As for me I don't care if I do. I am just setting the stage before I sue the Crown. If I do it ethically and correctly, settling with all the smiling bastards will become a matter of political will. N'est Pas?
                                                                     Veritas Vincit
                                                                            David Raymond Amos

David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:53:49 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Here is the email that should help unseat any incumbent
To: egmont@eastlink.ca, rkrussell@pei.sympatico.ca, ddaughton@gmail.com,
antolick@greenparty.ca, georgemarshall@ndp.ca, smithpad@pei.sympatico.ca,
megcumby@gmail.com, chisholma@gmail.com
CC: tom@tomdeblois.com, vote@noble4malpeque.com, ed@guergis.com,
info@wayneeaster.com, info@shawnmurphy.ca, McGuire.J@parl.gc.ca,
slabchuk@greenparty.ca, andrew@thegoodkid.com,
pmaloneycapcandidate@yahoo.ca, lois@loisbrown.ca, info@votebelinda.ca,
info@ndp4me.ca, fcomeau@auracom.com, sylvain.martel@csn.qc.ca,
alicepatry@rogers.com

Hey over there
       After talking to everyone on I could. I gave up on PEI last night and just shook my head. I figured that it would make no difference whether or not any of Humpty's Dumpty's cohorts in his government of entitlement got unseated. I found myself no fan of anyone who lusted for any of the nasty liberals seats on Parliament Hill. I love PEI and many of its people. The folks from over there deserve far better representitives than they now have but I had found no one who acted like any Islander I know. So I decided not to bother any you anymore except of course the NDP lawyer in Egmont who will not return my calls or answer my emails. To me she is just another lousy little lawyer who wants to play the game of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil for the benefit of her Brotherhood of the Bar. Methinks I will send her hard copy of evidence of many crimes before I sue Wayne Easter and Shawn Murphy. It makes no difference to me whether or not she gets elected she is always an officer of the court who has sworn an oath to uphold the law. Even Parliamentarians and lawyers are accountable in count when a pigheaded layman sues them. Nobobody is above the law. We shall see soon EH?
     However all that said I had a change heart last night after I quit trying to talk to my fellow Maritimers Young Andrew called me back. It seems there may be hope for young Islanders who never bother to vote for the likes of Wayne Easter and his buddies. I never did why should they? Andrew is the very ligitmate alternative but my best advice is to run as an Independent rather than under anyone's banner. i live by an old expression that Wayne Easter should consider when Landslide Annie and Belinda Stronach come acrost his dim witted mind. it goes like this. "God protect me from my friends, I can defend myself from my enemies. As for Shawn Murphy perhaps he should consider this old saying as he wonders why he never answered me at all and before he receives a summons to court. "I poor man need not fear a crowd of lawyers anymore than acrowd of pickpockets" How's that for picking an ethical fight EH?
     Watch out I am having some fun and more is coming soon. I Debate Humpty Dumpty dumbest Cabinet Minister very soon even though the Crown Corp CBC would not allow me to just like they did last year with the lawyer properly named Rob Moore before i was falsely imprisoned so George W. Bush, the Yankee he worships could get reelected. Good luck with your run for a seat Andrew and thanks for giving me your time. It is the most precious thing you have.
 
                                                        Veritas Vincit
                                                          David Raymond Amos
 
P.S. Hey Wayne say hey for me to Petey Baby MacKay's old sweety fart Belinda Stronach if you see her before she loses her seat in Upper Canada. Her opponent Lois Brown claims it is all about trust but she and I know she is all about getting elected. Do ya think that Beleinda knows that not all Maritimers are cry babies like you and MacKay? Some men like me ain't fooled by smart pretty rich women. I am kinda of fond of ordinary everyday Acadian women who are very wise about how life really is. The way those dark eyes catch my eye is much to my Yankee wife's chagrin. I think that maybe a big reason she wants me back in the USA ASAP. Don't ya think in his last two weeks as Prime Minister Humpty Dumpty would have the malicious Yankee warrant for my arrest revoked before my wife sues him? Her children have a Canadian birthright. Don't ya know the Charter you swore to uphold?
 
David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> wrote:
 
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:47:56 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Here is the email that should help unseat any incumbent

Yahoo! Autos. Looking for a sweet ride? Get pricing, reviews, & more on new and used cars.
Communications from our firm may contain or incorporate federal tax advice.  Under recently promulgated US Internal Revenue Service standards (Circular 230), we are required to inform you that only formal, written tax opinions meeting the requirements of Circular 230 may be relied upon by taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties.  Accordingly, this communication is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.

This e-mail message is generated from the law firm of Bowditch & Dewey, LLP and contains information that is confidential and may be privileged as an attorney/client communication or as attorney work product. The information is intended to be disclosed solely to the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of  this email information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete it from your computer system. For more information about Bowditch & Dewey, please visit our web site at
www.bowditch.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

It is high time to sue the bastards Barry

Sep 8, 2005 at 6:02 PM
David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
To: bbachrach@bowditch.com, alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, kandalaw@mindspring.com, registerodonnell@norfolkdeeds.org, david@lutz.nb.ca, dan@djflynn.com, jerryconstable@aol.com, adams_sammon@msn.com, info@mwpc.org, lliss@rubinrudman.com, regbert@egbertlaw.com, has@harveysilverglate.com, myson333@yahoo.com, jean.f.o'meara@aexp.com
Cc: ahamilton@casselsbrock.com, barnes.s@parl.gc.ca, boivin.f@parl.gc.ca, bulte.s@parl.gc.ca, comuzzi.j@parl.gc.ca, dryden.k@parl.gc.ca, devillers.p@parl.gc.ca, gallar@parl.gc.ca, jennings.m@parl.gc.ca, lapierre.j@parl.gc.ca, maloney.j@parl.gc.ca, lee.d@parl.gc.ca, macklin.p@parl.gc.ca, mcguinty.d@parl.gc.ca, mckay.j@parl.gc.ca, owen.s@parl.gc.ca, st.amand.l@parl.gc.ca, paradis.d@parl.gc.ca, peterson.j@parl.gc.ca, wappel.t@parl.gc.ca, leblanc.d@parl.gc.ca, murphy.s@parl.gc.ca, dmitchell@irvingmitchell.com, contact@citizenscentre.com, cbc@crimlaw.ca, belanger.jean-daniel@psio-bifp.gc.ca, pgriffin@lsrsg.com, jlaskin@torys.com, wbrock@dwpv.com
     
  Hey Barry  

   After what happened to Jeannah last week I was so pissed at everybody it took me some time to calm down. Now I am directing my anger in a very cold, well thought out and ethical fashion. I am printing this email and saving it to use as evidence against Kerstein and many others in federal court. It is a bit of a rant with no one to proof read it. Rest assured I don't care.

     As I told you long ago Norfolk Probate Court will never uphold the law. When they allowed William J. Kickham to be the executor of Uncle Franky's estate at the first of August after Jean had argued James Kickham, I knew the Feds were never get honest too and that the bastards would be coming after our home. Never forget Uncle Willy is an ex FBI agent. This has all boiled down to me trying to impeach George W. Bush and Paul Martin. I do not care if anyone believes me or not. That is the simple truth and that is why nobody will help me as well. Most folks do not understand my material. Most of the ones that do understand it, do not believe me. The one's that do believe me either do not care or are to chicken to help or attack me in order to cover up the public corruption for their own personal gain. It is just that simple. The proof of what I say is true is the fact that nobody will dare to call me a lair and put it in writing. Ask David Lutz, the Yankee Carpetbagger getting fat off of Maritime woes for years. He understands me very well. I looked him in the eye again last week just before his buddies threw me out of another court. He knows I am as serious as a heartattack or prostrate cancer.

    The most offensive thing to me is the rampant apathy that I have found within my fellow man. However it has explained to me why so much evil has been so easily practiced throughout history. If I did not have children. I would not give a good god damn for my fellow man. I don't care what other people think of me. Most of the human race does not deserve any respect from me whatsoever. I can easily justify that thinking. My FTW attitude is back bigtime but I will never to anything that will cause my kids or my friends to be ashamed of me. Whether I win or lose this battle i will wager most folks will steer clear of me from now on and that is the way I want it anyway. I am feeling pretty mean right now. I will pick who I want to know rather than the other way around. Howard Hughes' actions makes a lot of sense to me now.

     The letter at the bottom of this email to Adam Chu is just one example of what I am up to right now. I had to wait until I was certain that he got it. I am going to keep a lot of things under my hat after this in order to keep the smiling bastards in suspense as to whom I have contacted about what and when. I must find some fun in this or I will go nuts. There is great joy in knowing that there is no honour amongst thieves and eventualy the the truth will win out.

    Here is what is what I have come to understand of happened on Sept 2nd. Jean was in line behind this Lapointe character and the Kerstein arsehole before court began .They were apparently waiting to file an emergency motion and an affidavit for Gregg Chandler to intevene in the probate matter and scoop a bunch more money with no opposition from you or Jean. They did not know Jean was there as Kerstein went on and on about how we were screwed and what jokers you and I were. Jean kept silent as Kerstein bragged at how everything was in the bag and he was having a lot of fun mouthing off at our expense and explaining how he dealt with you and us the day before. Kerstein went red as beet and likely shit his pants though when they finally got to the clerk and he saw that Jean was behind him all along and was there to oppose his actions.

     As you know the clerk acknowledged that the court had changed the date to Sept 16th but did not tell the Judge Boorstein about it on Sept 2nd. The court played dumb as usual as the judge allowed the lawyers to go on with all of their nonsense. Troccoli appeared before the court along with the other two crooks and claimed that what you were doing on Jean's behalf was bullshit and a deliberate delay of justice on your part. The judge ignored Jeannah and her attempt to make her aware that the matter should not be heard because the court had changed the date and Kerstein ignored that fact. She tried to explain that you should at least have a chance to review the stuff in order to argue it. For obvious reasons Jean's pleas fell on very deaf ears and yet the court forced Jean to accept a pile of documents from LaPointe to give to you even though they did not recognize your standing in the matter. If the court does so later a lot of good that does us now if they have already allowed Kerstein's accounts and all the other crap that was not served upon us in the past. You know as well as I the court will either not notify us of any hearing, claim we were in default or ignore the appeal as they have always done.
     Kerstein has never spoken to any of us yet. Why should he start now when he has many crooked judges over a barrel and even brags of it? Hell Kerstein is even bold enough to force the court to accept a return of a warrant that I doubt it ever allowed or even filed in the first place. Talk about Kangaroo Courts. Massachusetts takes the cake and Kerstein's big belly proves he eats high off the hog supporting the porky pigs that steal cakes.
     In the end Judge Boorstein took the matter under advisement as usual until the court could come up with a new plan to screw us with. The crooks within Norfolk Probate Court etc. will never uphold the law because if they do they will hang themselves. Everybody knows it from George W. Bush on down. That is why the fat dumb Kerstein feels so cocky. You know it too, Barry. Why let him and Troccoli get away with this bullshit at the expense of your reputation too? Shouldn't you sue them too after you listen to what they have said about you in open court? I beleive Jean ordered the tape. You can't be afraid of arguing the likes of Troccoli and Kerstein particularly after they slander you. To hell with you complaining to the BBO about them. You know they ain't gonna do a damned thing. Never mind me and my actions just sue Kerstein and Troccoli yourself because of what they have said about you if for no other reason. Please understand that I know you are busy and have trouble with your health but we are heartsick and busy as hell as well.
      I am certainly not paranoid. Everything I said that would happen certainly did. Didn't it? I still do not understand why you did not file Jean's Motion in Norfolk Probate Court on July 27th along with yours or allowed her to file her affidavit in Dorchester District Court on July 28th. I am certain either document would have went a long way towards saving our home before the bastards Michael C. Moore and Adam and Gerold Loomis came to our door well over two weeks later with their unsigned warrant and threatened to arrest Jean and Dave and Woody in front of the Milton Cops. I have inserted the aforementioned motion and affidavit of Jean's within the text of this email for the record so that McDonnell and Kerstein can never claim that they did not know about them now. I would dearly love for McDonnell to try to prosecute me for sending it to her. I sent it from out of Canada to many Canadians as well in my best effory yo expose the crimes practiced aghainst my Clan.. The lowly little court in which McDonnell and Hanlon conduct their malicious actions in is just a sub court of a municipal court. It never had jurisdiction over my matter in the first place and everybody knows it. I have no doubt whatsoever my failure to follow Hanlon's orders anymore certainly did give her a migraine. However you and I both know it was just a signal for her and McDonnell to discuss my matter without you. The reason no one will confirm or deny that a warrant for my arrest exists is because there is none. The bastards just want to corner me first before they dream up something just like they did on Oct 1st. They can't fool me, I am too stupid.
     Barry please just act ethically ASAP and let the cards fall where they may for the benefit of all. Forget the false manners that crooks like Jenney, Kerstein, Adams and Troccoli pretend that they have with you. They are laughing at me and you. Just call a spade a spade just like I do. It is truly amazing how good it feels to do so.
    I must confess that Jean and I have no understanding of why you have allowed things to go this far. In all sincerity you should be as pissed off as we are. No officer of the court should have allowed the actions of Troccoli to continue this long with her obvious crimes against us. We do not understand why you have particularly after what went on over the beach house last year and my false imprisonment. Perjury is perjury, fraud is fraud, larceny is larceny, forgery is forgery etc etc. The crime of perjury both Kerstein and Troccoli have practiced against you as well as us. Why not hold them accountable for their actions for your benefit as well as ours? We do not understand why you followed the ADA McDonnell's orders and did not contact Troccoli on at least Jean's behalf before she and the kids were thrown on the street by Constables with an unsigned warrant. McDonnell had no problem critizing Jean's actions in defense of her home that she had homsteaded long before we had ever heard of Troccoli's name. The Norfolk Probate Court seems to want to ignore the fact that her father's estate is still not closed and the Norfolk Register of Deeds forgets that the place is homesteaded. The FBI and everybody else wants to ignore the fact that Triple M Movers stole much evidence of many crimes (including police surveilance tapes) when they broke into our home with the Milton Cops on August 17th.
     Jean went back to the probate court on Tuesday to check the docket to see if anything had happened and to see if Kerstein had in fact signed his warrant and if so had the clerks filed it and when. I was not surprised the clerks would not show the docket to her. We have no idea as to whether or not there will be another hearing or not but upon my viewing of what Jean was served by Lapointe it only serves to reaffirm the fact that we must sue Adams, Chandler and Troccoli ASAP. The best part of Lapointe's work is that he requests a hearing.
     I will sue Kerstein in Florida as I said I would. It would be too much fun not to do but I must clear up the matter of my false imprisonment for Troccoli's benefit first. Would you please order the tapes of all the hearings in Dorchester District Court now. Judge Hanlon promised them to me for free last October but the clerk only gave me a tape that had been largley erased in April. the hearings were held on Sept 3/04, Oct 1st/04, Oct 19th/04, Nov 18th/04, Jan 21st/05, April 21st/05(it was held ex parte behind locked doors)April 28th/05, Jul 28th/05 and Aug 2nd/05 . Also would you please demand that the ADA McDonnell to put something in writing as to whether or not there is a warrant out for my arrest and if so why? I also demand to know why there has been no notice of my appeal that was filed in May. It is time for me to prove in Canada just how crooked the Suffolk County District Attorney and Dorchester District Court truly is in order for me to return to the USA to defend my family and their interests. I have been very busy doing just that in the Maritimes but the USA is where I must sue Kerstein and Troccoli.   
    All that said what upset Jeannah and really pissed me off last week was what happened after court. Kerstein and Troccoli laughed and teased Jeannah about me being arrested and about her and the kids being thrown out of the home etc. Man that was way beyond mean even for the nastiest of Yankeee lawyers. I have no doubt it was a very deliberate attempt to give Jean a nervous breakdown again after she had surprised them by defending herself quite well in a pro se fashion. Although she told the crooks off in no uncertain terms she was so upset afterwards that she would not discuss what happened or send me the documents for a couple of days so that I could at least know who LaPointe was and what was going on.
      As soon as I found out who the bastard, LaPointe was, I called him and his partner Burke, left voicemails and ripped them both new arseholes. They did not call me back and when I called them again yesterday they would not come to the phone. They will have to answer a summons though. I will sue them in Florida along with their buddy Kerstein as soon as I resolve with Canadian authorities and the ADA McDonnell the bullshit about my false arrest. If this email does not prove my sincerity sooner or later they will see in a federal courtroom or from a Canadian soapbox just who is a joker and who is not.
    As you can see I have also sent this email to Adams, Kerstein, McDonnell and many Canadians as well. I defy anyone to call me a liar as I make it a point to prove to the world what dumb crooked Yankee lawyers act like byway of the actions of the likes of McDonnell, Whiting, Adams. Kerstein and Troccoli. Putting me in jail in order to coverup public corruption is one thing. I am a big boy and I can handle it but throwing my wife and kids on the street and then laughing at her is another kettle of fish all together. What kind of man would I be if I did not spring to her defense? Many Yankee lawyers are about to learn a hard but very ethical lesson about the fury of a patient man. I am mad as hell but my vengeance will be served on a cold plate in court. I really want to fry Constable Gerold Loomis' arse bigtime by taking his home from him in a singular lawsuit just between he and I. I have that big dumb bastard on video tape and can't wait to meet his Yankee lawyer after our little talk last week. He talks tough while I say what I mean. He may scare my wife but he don't scare me.
     I just came out of the hills yesterday to check emails etc then I am gone again for awhile as the RCMP and some Canadian politicians deal with their conscience and decide whether or not to continue to support Yankee arseholes such as Kerstein and his newfound friend. This LaPointe dude really pissed me off but at least I have his signature so he can never deny that he did not know the truth and the fact that he even expected me to sue him. Jean is faxing you what was served upon her to give to you. In the "mean" time why don't you give La Pointe a call and ask him for me if he is crooked or dumb or both. If he plays dumb ask him if he at least knows how to read what was served upon his clients before he writes something on their behalf. What I would like to know is why he is so brazen to attack my wife in person and yet too much of a chickenshit to call me back even though he feels free to slam me within his sneaky malicious documents after his clients have my family illegaly thrown into the street. It seems to me he must be in bed with the ADA McDonnell as well.
      This is way beyond ridiculous Barry but at least the kids and I are still having a little fun with our life in the Maritimes. this weekend there is a Balloon Fiesta, a car show and pig roast on the agenda. However none of us should be to busy to do something important like impeaching George W. Bush and Paul Martin. Help me will ya? You know for a fact that no other lawyer or politician will. Use the wiretap tapes you have in your possession to prove the public corruption yourself in order to help set Leonard free and relieve Jean of her troubles with crooked Yankee lawyers.
   To prove my point about how seriously pissed off I am right now I called Prakash I. Khatri, the Ombudsman for the DHS at 202-254-4105 to my surprise found myself reaching the voicemail for the latest Inspector General Skinner and his underlings. I doubt they will forget my call but nobdy called me back today as I demanded. After I send this email I will call the bastards again. Then I will send more hard copy to one odf the new Secretary's underlings along with a printout odf this email.
     I really want to know what happened to the Secret Service agents that came to my door in April of 2003 at the behest of Quincy District Court and why the Treasury Agent Timothy Croston has claimed that he has no idea who I am. Most importantly I want to know why Ken Kaiser the special agent in charge of the FBI in Beantown refused to allow his agents to come to our home on August 17th and pick up their own god damned wiretap tapes before Triple M Movers stole them along with my old Harley with Nova Scotia plates on it. Rest assured I want that bike back to say the least. I do not allow anyone near that bike without plan to stop them if they may wish to steal it. The biker in me would have it no other way. Even the crooks Robert, William and Brian O'Meara must have wondered why I left my bikes there. They know how much I dearly love my old bikes. I laugh at the fact that Triple M call my bikes junk. They stole other people's property as well and they ain't laughing.
 
   Obviously I sent the hard copy to Kerstein's buddy Adam Chu just like I promised him I would after he had requested it Sept 1st. Now that he has received it lets see if he gives you a call and answers you in writing.

Adam Chu                                                              September 7th, 2005
1212 Hancock St.
Quincy MA 02169

              Re: My pending lawsuit against your buddy, Neil M. Kerstein

Sir,

      Please find enclosed the hard copy of the material that you requested. As I told you during our conversation on Sept 1st in which I questioned you about your knowledge of the warrant Neil M. Kerstein purportedly signed on July 25th, in your presence. That document was about to be argued in Norfolk Probate Court. This material I have provided to you is exactly the same stuff sent to many Canadian politicians etc. on August 2nd before any warrant that Kerstein and his associate Troccoli claims was sworn out for my arrest in the USA. I have also enclosed a print out of an email sent out on Sept 1st that contained your name and address as proof of my contact with you at that time. The CD which is a copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as an officer of the court in order that it may be properly investigated.

       If you have any questions perhaps you should contact the lawyers listed below. The LaPointe character whom I have no doubt you know, made a rather interesting sneak attack against my Clan on Sept 2nd after your buddy Kerstein dodged our lawyer Barry Bachrach’s attempt to notify him that the date of the hearing had been changed by the court to Sept 16th. It now appears that Lapointe’s intervention in our matters on behalf of the nasty Yankees, Gregg Chandler and his wife Diane Sacco has put a new twist on everything. LaPointe claims to know the truth of everything so perhaps LaPointe, Barry Bachrach and you should have a long talk about the ethical conduct of Kerstein and Angela Troccoli before I decide to sue you too Mr. Chu.

      Please send your answer to me byway of Barry Bachrach. Your buddy Kerstein bragged in front of my wife that he thinks Barry and I are jokers. Check my work to see for yourself. I am too busy politicking in Canada right now to bother much with cheap dime store lawyers from Quincy right now but you may feel free to prove my initial opinion of you to be wrong. Please help me impeach George W. Bush only if you have enough sand to act ethically and uphold the law as your license to practice law demands.

Jeffrey C Lapointe                                           Barry A. Bachrach
Law Offices of George E Burke                         Bowditch & Dewey
339 Hancock Street                                         311 Main Street
Quincy MA 02171                                             Worcester MA 01608

                                                                             David R. Amos

                                                                             P.O. Box 73

                                                                             Acworth, NH. 03601

Label/Receipt Number: 0304 1560 0002 1590 6866
Detailed Results:

Acceptance, September 07, 2005, 9:47 pm, BOSTON, MA 02205
Arrival at Unit, September 08, 2005, 8:19 am, QUINCY, MA 02169
Delivered, September 08, 2005, 12:51 pm, QUINCY, MA 02169
 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

THE TRIAL COURT

NORFOLK, SS.                                                     PROBATE AND FAMILY COURT

ROBERT F. O’MEARA,       )

WILLIAM J. O’MEARA,      )

BRIAN L. O’MEARA,          )

             plaintiffs              )                          C.A. NO. 04E0017PP1

                  v.                    )

                                          )

JEAN F. O’MEARA,              )

DAVID R. AMOS                  )

MAX X. AMOS )

GRACE E. AMOS                 )

           defendants               )

MOTION OF THE DEFENDANT, JEAN F. O’MEARA, FOR THE COURT TO SUPPORT OR REPORT THE MALICIOUS ACTIONS WITHIN THE ESTATES OF

FRANCIS X. O’MEARA AND JANE E. O’MEARA BY THE PURPORTED DULY COMMISSIONER, NEIL M. KERSTEIN

Now comes the defendant, Jean F. O’Meara and motions the Norfolk Probate Court to clarify the standing of the lawyer, Neil M. Kerstein in the above stated matter and in the estate of Francis X. O’Meara, Norfolk Probate Court docket no.76F3087-A1 To the best of the defendant’s knowledge the aforesaid estate has yet to be closed because of some sort of unresolved action in Norfolk Superior Court docket no. 93370. Please view attachments. In support thereof the Defendant states as follows.

  1. On July 11th, 2005 an action was brought against the defendant and her family by Gregg A. Chandler (Chandler) of Quincy, MA in an effort to evict the family from their home based on his transactions with the lawyer Neil M. Kerstein (Kerstein) who clearly has no understanding of his purported obligations under M.G.L. 241. On February 7th, 2005 Kerstein lamented to this court about his need for a lawyer to defend him in possible future litigation. The court apparently ignored his concerns without a record of any hearing and yet affirmed by court order the fact that the court has no authority to evict anyone or invade the privacy of their home.
  2. The defendant further states that on June 16th, 2005 during the course of the third home invasion by police and many others without warrants or due process of law, Kerstein advised Chandler not to speak to the defendant’s husband on the phone and challenged David R. Amos again to sue him in federal court. This time the statements of Kerstein and others were recorded with their complete knowledge and assent in front of the Milton Police Dept while they stood inside the defendant’s home without a warrant. That is the reason for this motion. The defendants must know the names of all people willingly assisting Kerstein in his malicious and criminal actions.
  3. The defendant further states that on January 27th, 2005 Kerstein challenged the defendant’s husband to sue him and he was served in hand much material that is evidence to prove the many crimes practiced against their family. The aforesaid material included a CD copy of a police surveillance tape that District Attorneys, US Attorneys and all law enforcement officials either ignore or destroy or falsely claim that it is evidence in the defendant’s probate matters.
  4. The defendant further states that one such CD of wiretap tape # 139 was filed in this court on September 21st, 2004 to prove once and for all that the wiretap tapes in the defendants husband’s possession have nothing to do with probate matters whatsoever. The CD was attached to the defendant’s second pretrial memorandum hopefully to remain sealed until trial and out of the public view. At the end of June this year the defendant saw the CD within the docket of this matter and the seal on the envelope had been broken and the CD left in the public record for anyone to listen to without her permission.
  5. The defendant further states that on May 16th, 2002, I homesteaded my principle residence at 153 Alvin Ave Milton, MA for the benefit of my family which includes my minor children Max X.Amos and Grace E. Amos, my husband David R. Amos. It was necessary for me to do so because of the strange actions of the Norfolk Probate Court and many of my family members against me. There is no logical reason for these malicious actions other than the willful assistance of the Commonwealth and many others to cover up the apparent fraud practiced against me by the Kickham Law Offices and this court.
  6. The defendant further states that as of September 21st, 2004 the defendants had proven the fraud and perjury of the lawyer, Angel Troccoli (Troccoli) to the probate courts and two District Attorneys of this Commonwealth many times. On Sept. 21st at the end of the second Pre Trial Conference, Judge Langlois ordered Troccoli to begin again and serve all interested parties a copy of her Petition to Partition, give the defendants copies of her title search and the information on an unnamed bank that she claimed had held a mortgage on the property. Within ten days of that event the defendant, David R. Amos was falsely imprisoned by the Dorchester District Court in order to support Troccoli’s false allegations against him. Immediately thereafter on or about October 8th, 2004 Troccoli filed in this court an application for an interlocutory decree that was never served upon anyone. This court did not docket the aforesaid decree and yet Kerstein was purportedly appointed on its basis. It appears that the Commonwealth wishes to deny that Pre Trail Conferences in this matter had ever happened, ignore the crimes practiced against the defendant’s family in order to bankrupt them and throw them into the street before the truth of their matters is revealed. .
  7. In further support of the forgoing statements the defendant states that after reviewing many very questionable filings on behalf of my interests by my cousins, the lawyers within the Kickham Law Offices, I had petitioned the court to reopen four matters affecting my interests including this estate of my mother, Jane E. O’ Meara. On May 16th, 2002, I argued Pro Se two law firms billing their fees to my interests as best I could in a Pre-Trial Conference about three of my petitions because no lawyer was willing to assist me even though the trust of Elaine G. Kickham would pay their fees to assist me. I succeeded that day in having William J. Kickham removed as trustee of the trust of Elaine G. Kickham. However the court ignored the fact that his attorney, James M. Kickham withdrew from the matter after having admitted that he had falsely stated in a prior filing that I had assented to the closing of the estate of Elaine G. Kickham and clearly stated it was because my husband David R. Amos had proven his lack of integrity to the Board of Bar Overseers. The Norfolk Probate Court even when confronted with the admitted perjury of a lawyer refused to reopen the estates of Lawrence and Elaine Kickham in order that all assets could be properly inventoried and agreed upon. One year later the Register of this court allowed the Kickham Law Offices to file court ordered revised accountings without any interested party assenting and the Tax Fraud within the estate of Elaine G. Kickham in open view on the very first line of their fraudulent accountings. At the very same point in time a court without jurisdiction had ordered judgements by default in two lawsuits against the Kickhams and the court appointed trustee and his law firm.
  8. The defendant further states that on September 12th, 2002 Judge Langlois of this court who was a litigant against me in federal court at the time allowed a Motion to Dismiss my petition to reopen my mother’s estate because of his interest in the outcome. The Motion to Dismiss of Robert F. O’Meara was served upon my husband who had yet to file an appearance in the matter under my Durable Power of Attorney. The service was not proper. Two years later on September 21st, 2004. Judge Langlois struck my husband’s Appearance and Motion to Dismiss this matter on his own accord without a Motion to Strike in order to continue to protect his own interests once again. The court should not have acted without a motion from the opposing parties.
  9. The defendant further states that all matters must begin with a petition properly served and filed according to law. On September 21st, 2004 the defendants forever proved the perjury of Troccoli in this matter to the Norfolk Probate and Family Court and the Norfolk County Register of Deeds. On March 8th, 2004 Troccoli swore under penalties of perjury that she had complied with M.G.L. 241 Section 7 and filed a notice of the Petition to Partition in this matter within the records of the Norfolk County Register of Deeds. However she did not do so until weeks after she filed her application for a Interlocutory Decree and the defendant’s husband David R. Amos had been released from jail on bail. Judge Boorstein of this court who has acted and given orders on all actions in this matter since September 21st, 2004 also sits as chairperson on the Massachusetts Supreme Court Mental Health Advisors Committee. The aforesaid committee has ignored in writing David R. Amos’ pleas for assistance while its chairperson ignores the proof within the dockets before her that he is not crazy. Please view Exhibit A.
  10. In conclusion the defendant states that she has not talked to the purported Court Appointed Commissioner Kerstein because of his unwillingness to do so. By his own admission in filings within this court he was not allowed into her home on May 12th, 2005 prior to his malicious public auction. It was because he failed to produce evidence of a bond or a warrant and Assistant Register John B. Jenney Jr. affirmed that he did not within a voicemail to the defendant within two hours of Chandler signing a contract with Kerstein in front of her home. On June 1st, during the course of the first home invasion by Kerstein and the Milton Police without a warrant Kerstein viewed the latest evidence of Securities Fraud on the kitchen table of the defendants’ home and merely asked who the executor of the estate was. Kerstein claimed that he did not care about any crimes because he worked for the court and not the interested parties in the real estate he was attempting to sell. The action of Gregg A. Chandler in Quincy District Court to evict the defendants from their home should not go forward until their matters have been resolved in federal courts with the proper jurisdiction and venue. Please view Exhibit B, it contains true copies of the answers of the defendants Jean F. O’Meara and David R. Amos to Gregg A. Chandler’s complaint.

Wherefore for the above stated reasons the defendant demands as follows:

a. The Norfolk Probate Probate and Family Court closely review all filings and hearings in this matter and see that the criminals acting against the defendants are properly prosecuted.

                                                            Submitted by

Dated July 27th, 2005                                                     Jean F. Meara, Pro Se

                                                                                     153 Alvin Ave.

                                                                                     Milton, MA. 02186

                                                                                      617 698-6549

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

THE TRIAL COURT

DORCHESTER SS                                               DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT

THE COMMONWEALTH OF    )

MASSACHUSETTS                 )                                CRIMINAL ACTION

                                               )                          DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623

                  v.                          )

DAVID R. AMOS                      )

AFFIDAVIT OF JEAN F. O’MEARA

    Now comes, Jean F. O’Meara a US Citizen and wife of David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent Resident of the USA and freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the following statements are true and to the best of her knowledge.

  1. I am a very important witness to testify in defense of my husband’s freedom during the course of his pending trial.
  2. I have read what the Assistant District Attorney Alicia S. McDonnell has said about my family’s affairs in the email exchange in June with my husband’s attorney, Barry Bachrach. I am greatly offended. Mr. Bachrach is the lawyer who tried to protect my interests in the probate courts of the Commonwealth while my husband ran for Parliament Canada in a sincere effort to expose the public corruption we have become very aware of. I am grateful Mr. Bachrach replaced my husband to stand at my side yesterday in Quincy District Court and Norfolk Probate Court. Today I will witness what is said as he speaks on my husband’s behalf in a status hearing while my husband awaits his appeal in this matter that I witnessed him file on May 31st, 2005.
  3. I am well aware that the Assistant District Attorney Alicia S. McDonnell wishes to file some sort of affidavit to support more false allegations of hers. It appears that she wishes to claim that my husband has violated the terms of his bail and has continued to harass the lawyer, Angela Troccoli (Troccoli) when actually the reverse is true.
  4. On May 12th, 2005 Angel Troccoli and two of her client’s visited our home to support the malicious actions of her associate, Neil M. Kerstein (Kerstein) and to laugh at us and our plight.
  5. On June 1st, 2005 immediately after a home invasion by Kerstein and the Milton Police Dept. without warrants or due process of law, Troccoli sent the Norfolk County Sheriff Dept. with a notice to my husband that she was evicting him. My husband never contacted Angel Troccoli other than to call the Ellis law firm and Barry Bachrach and then fax supporting documents after determining if her associate Kerstein’s information was correct about Troccoli’s latest address. It was in order for Barry Bachrach to respond to Troccoli about the very malicious eviction notice. I have no understanding what gives the District Attorney the right to order Mr. Bachrach not to confer with Troccoli about her notice of eviction to us.
  6. I certainly do not understand why the Police and the Attorney General maintain that it is ok for Troccoli to order her clients, William and Robert O’Meara to break into and enter my home while my husband is inside awaiting a trial based on Troccoli’s false allegations.
  7. It was I who mailed my husband’s letter with all the supporting material to the Suffolk County District Attorney on or about July 20th, 2005 in order to prove whatever the law office of Dane M. Shulman and Troccoli were saying about my husband was false.
  8. On June 1st, 2004 it was I not my husband who had visited the law offices of Dane M. Shulman in order to serve the lawyer, Angela Troccoli (Troccoli) documents in answer to her complaint that she had marked to be heard that day and then failed to appear. It was impossible and ridiculous for the lawyer Angela Troccoli to claim that my husband was stalking her. He was not even the USA from the first week of June 2004 until he was summoned before this court on September 3rd and he immediately returned to Canada afterwards until September 13th to argue Troccoli in two events on Sept 13th and Sept 21st in Norfolk Probate Court dispite the fact that she had falsely claimed that he is not a litigant against her. Troccoli’s own eviction notice proves her statements false.
  9. I have witnessed all that has occurred and heard all that has been said in Dorchester District Court by and against my husband beginning September 3rd, 2004 after he had returned to the USA and stood before the court in response to a summons served upon our home in Milton MA dated August 13th, 2004. The only exception was on April 21st, 2005 when there was apparently some sort of hearing in this court held behind locked doors that my husband was not notified of. The clerk’s office of this court made me aware of the of hearing on April 21st after I had visited the Suffolk County District Attorney’s Office in order to have the police surveillance wiretap tapes retuned to us and to provide the DA with more evidence of crimes against my family before the lawyer Angela Troccoli and her associates including the Milton Police Dept. began their illegal invasions of our home and our privacy on May 12th, 2005. .
  10. On September 3rd, 2004, I along with two others, one a Canadian Citizen and another a US Citizen witnessed my husband, David R. Amos give many original wiretap tapes to the Assistant District Attorney Alicia S. McDonnell in her office before he spoke to Judge Coffey and tried to provide the court with many documents to prove that Troccoli was a lair one month before the court and the DA supported the Clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens’ illegal and malicious actions. The tapes have since disappeared just like my husband predicted they would.

                                  Signed before the court and

                                 under the Pains and

                                  Penalties of Perjury by

Dated July 28th, 2005                                                      Jean F. O’Meara

                                                                                     153 Alvin Ave.

                                                                                     Milton, MA. 02186

                                                                                     617 698-6549


                                  Veritas Vincit
                                                     David Raymond Amos

"Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com> wrote:

What happened Friday? Sorry I got sick again from flying, this is getting ridiculous, and I got busy and forgot to ask if there is a new date? I am going to see leonard tomorrow so expect me to get sick again. This is a fun life.

Communications from our firm may contain or incorporate federal tax advice.  Under recently promulgated US Internal Revenue Service standards (Circular 230), we are required to inform you that only formal, written tax opinions meeting the requirements of Circular 230 may be relied upon by taxpayers for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties.  Accordingly, this communication is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax-related penalties under the Internal Revenue Code.

This e-mail message is generated from the law firm of Bowditch & Dewey, LLP and contains information that is confidential and may be privileged as an attorney/client communication or as attorney work product. The information is intended to be disclosed solely to the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of  this email information is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email and delete it from your computer system. For more information about Bowditch & Dewey, please visit our web site at
www.bowditch.com

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Fwd: The Feds are at it again

Sep 28, 2005 at 7:01 PM
David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
To: jeanfomeara@yahoo.com, myson333@yahoo.com
1 File272kB

Hey Barry
     Look at the bottom of this email. Remember when we told each other to be careful last year on this very day? Well it is even more true today. I will wager many crooks are very nervous that I am still free and raising hell. Just like last year I have a very bad feeling that the bastards are going to try something again. Desperate people do do desperate things. I am being as careful as possible please be careful too. I know you are on vacation and I have not heard from you lately. So I do not know whether or not the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell has provided you with any proof of the malicious warrant she swore out for my arrest but at least the FBI has affirmed to me that it exists.
       Here is one of those emails that I warned you would be politicaly vicious. I am a politicall animal but never forget the Suffolk County District Attorney is a politician. He answered me before the politically appointed Clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens made his ridiculous criminal complaint against me last year. They have already proven to me are far more vicious than I.
      For my own benefit I am will print this email after I send it to myself and you. I obviously also sent to the two women one Canadian, one Yankee, the FBI dudes in CT that claim to be so concerned about public corruption and last but far from least the Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz. All of whom have refused to act within the scope of their employment for a very long time. I don't care if they answer this email or not but I certainly hope you do. As you know not only are you my attorney right now you are also very important witness for me as well.
     I must leave my friend's house soon and hit the road in order to serve a bunch a lawyers in hand and mail a pile of other stuff to many bad acting lawyers and politicians etc. Then I will file a Statement of Claim in Canadian Federal Court against the Crown. I suspect that the bastards will try hard to stop me before I can file that complaint. After I got off the phone today with the clerk of the Federal Trial Court in Fredericton, I began composing this email. I am covering my bases as best I can. If you have not heard from me for a few weeks or if you wish to check to see if I filed the complaint, here is the clerk's number (506 452-3016) I made the clerk office well aware of what I will be filing and why. I will publish that statement of claim on the web before I file it so that it cannot dissapear so easily from the public record like so much of my other work often does. The clerk did me the courtesy of faxing me a copy of another complaint by fishermen against the Crown last year so that I can use it as sort of a template to make my filing acceptable to the court. I love the fact that it appears that even the Federal Court thinks my work is a typical pigheaded Maritimer's action after all.
      If need be, I will present this email to any cop who decides to hassle me for the benefit of the rampant public corruption he wishes to support. I will also give them the same material I sent Shirley Heafey, the  Commissioner of Public Complaints Against the RCMP. I will let them all wonder who else I sent this email to. Rest assured, it will be many.
     It is necessary that I do this in this fashion because I got word that the local RCMP have been sniffing around and talking to my friends about me. There is no denying I am spooked. Alicia S. McDonell has taught me to be wary of false allegations. The cops are claiming that they got a call from Ottawa from people stating that I was a possible physical threat to someone. The RCMP in Sussex are well aware that I seldom leave the house these days except to get more cigarettes and coffee. In an effort to be left alone, I told many people that I intended go many places when in fact I went almost nowhere at all. My friends have said that if the cops have questions they should go talk to me because everybody knows that I am not in hiding but the cops should recognize my right to go anywhere I wish as a free man in a free country that he is a citizen of. The Yankee Feds must know I haven't gone anywhere too because my constant emailings and phone calls leave no time to do anything else and I should be very easy to locate by the telephone id alone. I am freely telling anyone anything they wish to know about everything I know to be true before the Feds try to shut me up. Everybody knows the Yankee Feds watch the internet etc like a hawk. They are likely reading this email as I type it into the web. That is one of the reasons I sent my material the General Counsel of Yahoo. I wanted to make certain that the Yankees do not kill this email address just like they did all the rest.
      I see no need to talk to any RCMP officers anymore. Three and a half years is long enough to wait for them to do the right thing. I sent their lawyer, Ms. Longo hard copy of my material last year before I was falsely imprisoned in the USA and Shirley Heafey knows it. I am entitled to an answer from the General Counsel of a Crown Corp. and the Commissioner appointed to check their work on my behalf before I am compelled to deal with the help anymore. If nothing else I am a member of the puiblic you has human rights as well. A few of the questions that I ask my friends after they tell me about the cops asking questions are "Who was the cop, what did he say and what did he want to know?" One of cops named to me was the RCMP officer Derek Daniels. Of all of the cops in Sussex that should have an understanding and investigated the truth of my matters by now it should have been that RCMP officer in particular.
    After what I did in court up here last year and all the answers I got from the various authorities way up the food chain from him, Derek Daniels has no excuse whatsoever. He was the first one in Sussex I crossed paths with three years ago. I had a long talk with the cop Derek Daniels in front of three witnesses on the last day of hunting season in November of 2002 after he had taken it upon himself to stop some of my friends and I on the road for no stated reason whatsoever. One thing I recall about our converstion was that as he was looking at the list of Yankee lawyers I was dealing with at the time, he remarked that a lot of them seemed to be of the same bunch that were up here investigating the tragic bus accident that had occurred the year before in Sussex. It seems that Canadian taxpayers were forced to go to great expense to make a big change in the highway because no doubt some clever Yankee lawyers convinced our dumb government lawyers that since one Yankee did not know how to drive safely and obey the law the Canadian people may be somehow responsible for the accident. It seems to me that Daniels has sided with clever crooked Yankee lawyers and against me because he thinks me dumb too. Well if that is the case, he should also know that he cannot fool me because I am too stupid. Daniels has known the truth of my matters for three years and has done nothing about it at all. Some cop EH?
     Attached to this email is the obvious perjury of Troccoli that she filed herself in Norfolk Probate Court. I will print it and attach it to the hard copy of this email. I will ask the cops that may choose to hassle me why she filed her documents with the Norfolk County Register of Deeds only after I came screaming out of jail and tried to remove the matter to US District Court. I will love to hear their answer because it is her false allegations that also caused my imprisonment. In my humble opinion this attachment is the first document you should present to the Judge in Norfolk Probate Court on October 26th on Jean's behalf. The entire action against our home began with perjury and the Norfolk Probate Court knows it. Everything that has been done against us should be undone ASAP. The Norfolk County Register of Deeds is well aware of that fact plus the fact that Jean had homesteaded the property long before we had ever heard of Angela Troccoli. He has a lot to answer for. I defy anyone to call me a liar especially the crooked Assistant District Attorney of Suffolk County Alicia S. McDonell. The simple truth is she swore out the warrant for my arrest in an effort to stop me from suing her and Judge Hanlon before the crooks could steal our home and our belongings. It was a very malicous effor to bankrupt us and break our hearts. However my wife and kids can still sue them no matter what they may do to me and our home..
        Barry, you know as well as I that for Jean and the kids benefit I must not go to jail or they will be truly screwed. The last people I can afford to trust are the RCMP. Everybody knows I have been like a ghost since I have returned home this time around the cops have no right to hassle me at all. Ghosts are as harmless as hell and they usually only haunt one spot. The RCMP have been making false allegations against me for years long before I ever even knew the names of many Yankee lawyers such as Charles J. Kickham Jr. or Angela K. Tocccoli. Ever since I testified against the RCMP's actions in the far from accidental death of a man on a motorcycle, I have not been on the list to join them in the Lions Den. I must say I am greatful not to be considered one of their ilk and that anything the cops in Sussex may say about me now should be doubted. I have few stories to tell about them that are not so hard to beleive.
       Lately I have been very careful of what I say on the phone and put in emails so that my ethical actions cannot be misunderstood. Since I have been home I have very purposely stayed away from almost everyone including most of my friends. Most of what I say, I put in writing and I do not speak long on the phone to people I do not trust. Just ask the lawyer Joyce Richardson about that fact. While the bigtime canadian crooks such as Johnny Crosbie, Justice Gomery, Jack Layton, Stevey Harper and Paul Martin were yucking it up in the Maritimes during the past month, I usually stayed inside the house so no one could accuse me of doing anything malicious at all. I know that they expected me to turn up everywhere but in truth I only went out in public once and that was in a court in Saint John on August 30th. Ask the Yankee lawyer, David Lutz or the Deputy Sheriff Shay who threw me out of court on his behalf what I said and why. Better yet ask his plain clothes RCMP buddies Johnny Dewinter of Jimmy Gas why I am so pissed off. They heard everything Judge Henrick Tonning and I said in court last year. It makes no difference that the transcript was edited and the tape is no longer available. Many other people heard what was said too.
      Lately I have been getting many strange calls again on the cell phone from some interesting Yankee Feds including the FBI and the DHS. They are just like the ones I got from Chief Kevin Mearn in November of 2002 after his political friends Senators Joyce and Kerry received my mail in October of 2002 just before they were reelected. I got another strange call yesterday from the DHS. That is what prompted this email. I crossed paths with them bigtime to make certain that Max got safely back to the USA to comfort his mother. They were a little late getting back to me now. The phone id comes up blank and there is no record of the call and the people will not properly identify themselves so what am I to think of that? If they cannot act openly then obviously they are up to no good. I called some of their offices quite awhile ago but they are just getting back to me now? I must ask why to all. The RCMP, FBI and the DHS appear to be fishing around for info from me or anyone in an effort to find something to hang me with. The Feds refuse to speak to you even though I demand that they do. They seem to be avoiding you like the plague just like Alicia S. McDonnell and Angie Troccoli did. It seems they don't appreciate ethical lawyers for some reason. Eh? Hell the Feds will not even take your phone number So I will give to them in this fashion. Here it is 1 508 926 3403 Correct?
       I do have the right to remain silent. You know as well as I was forced to enlist your help once again in order to meet the terms of the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell's malicious motion on April 28th. She should uphold the law and deal with you as my attorney about the simple truth of my matters. The same holds true for the Yankee Feds if they have questions of me now they should talk to my attorney. Correct?  
      I will deal with the Canadian Feds and the people employed to insure that they act ethically byway of a very justifiable lawsuit against the Crown. I have no understanding as to why the Yankee and Canadian Feds did not make certain that Angela Troccoli and her buddy Neil M. Kerstein were not in jail before they threw my wife and kids out of their home and into the street. They have raised the stakes not me. It seems to me that they forgot that my kids are Canadian citizens too. Quincy district court claimed that you and Jean were in default but they sent no notice to me. Remember I filed an answer to Chandler on my kids behalf and you served his lawyer for me and watched me file it with the clerk. I know for certain my kids were definitely not in default and Chandler's lawyer never argued me about their interests. It would have been in the Feds' best interest to act within the scope of their employment and at least come to our home on August 17th to stop Triple M. Movers, Constable Moore and his buddies the Milton Police from taking my kids beds out of their mother's home. Troccoli's and Kerstein's Fraud is Fraud and their Perjury is Perjury etc etc. Someone must be held accountable for the crimes. The crimes are undeniable and recorded in the public record. The fraudulent documents are filed by the very lawyers who practiced the crimes. What more should I have to do other than just point to the public record? What planet do Yankee lawyers and cops come from? The same one RCMP officers come from no doubt.
   I am trying hard to prove to my fellow Maritimers once and for all that justice is a myth. To that end, I will try to take this matter up today with one Shirley Heafey's assistants once again and the Justice Dept lawyer named Ted Tax. Here are their numbers too. Ted Tax (902) 426-7592 and Steven McDonell (sound familiar?) (613) 952-1302. Clearly this is an ethical effort to offset the RCMP considering to pounce on me in an attempt to lock me up for the benefit of crooked Yankees like Angie Troccoli, Judge Hanlon and ADA Alicia S. McDonnell. That said, I have no faith in the integrity of Heafey's Commission or Ted Tax either or they would have called me back by now. I just want proof of contact one last time. This email is just one of the ways I will do it. I will use the phone next. After all Shirley Heafey should have read my US Mail by now. Her silence is deafening. Ted Tax will receive the same material soon.
                                                  Veritas Vincit
                                                      David Raymond Amos
 
P.S. As I was typing this by some strange coincidence the Minister of Indian Affairs the yo yo Andy Scott whom I mentioned you in the letter to him last year is on Cpac talking to the Standing Committee on Human Rights about what a great job he did as Solicitor General for Canada in getting sweat lodges allowed in prison. I just have to send this email to him too now. Perhaps you and he should talk ASAP I am considering running against him for a seat in Parliament next time around. Here is his phone number. (613) 992-1067. I will insert the text of the letter to him last year at the bottom of this email so that he cannot play dumb anymore.
 
P.P.S  The funniest and saddest thing of all just came into my email inbox. It appears that within one day of our newest Governor General taking office , she wants to play as dumb as Andy Scott. Now that she won't take my emails I will send her byway of Queen's Privy Council Hard Copy. As you know the former Governor General Adrienne Clarkson answered me last year before I was falsely imprisoned. Enough is enough but at least Michaëlle Jean proved to me that she is a crook out of the gate. The most truly strange coincidence of all is that at the very same point in time the Cpac channel was playing the tape of Michaëlle Jean swearing into her office yesterday. I just listened to her swear to uphold the laws of the land and see that justice is served and then I get her email rejection. Have a look for yourself. This is a tragic comedy that Shakespeare would have loved to write about. This is far more than a mere farce Barry. It is truly very sad as well.
 
     All I can say about this right now is WOW and Yea right tell me another one Mr. Ibbitson
 
Date: 28 Sep 2005 14:02:05 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@yahoo.com
To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
Subject: failure notice
 
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at yahoo.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message
to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry
it didn't work out.

<info@gg.ca>:
198.103.213.5 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 552 Error: content rejected 

The remarkable new Governor-General personifies the free and open country Canada wants to be

By JOHN IBBITSON

Wednesday, September 28, 2005, Page A1

OTTAWA -- Her promise is the promise of what we almost are, of what we want to be. She is the becoming Canada.

There is a reason for the extraordinary attention paid yesterday to the investiture of Michaëlle Jean as Governor-General, and for the extraordinary controversy -- from accusations of separatist sympathies to the indiscretions of a dress designer -- that preceded it.

 

  For the record my Jean did hear Judge Hanlon read the following email into the public record and sorta argue it with herself. What I would like to know is what the hell happened to the Appeal I filed in May to oppose her decision not to recuse herself? Judge Hanlon had no right to speak to you at all on July 28th and August 2nd until that appeal had been dealt with by the Supreme Court. There was no need for me to appear before Judge Hanlon until that appeal had been heard. Her order for me to appear on August 2nd was very malicious indeed.
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 8:51 AM
Subject: Attn Barry Bachrach and Assistant DA McDonnell

  On April 28th, 2005 I made Judge Hanlon well aware of the facts of the matter and that I would not allow myself to have my head examined by any Yankee whatsoever. A friend of mine Robert Cochrane on his own accord and without my prior knowledge called another friend of mine, Ken Ross the Assistant Deputy Minister of Health in New Brunswick on April 28th as soon as I made him aware that the ADA was trying to put me back in Sheriff Cabral's Psych Ward.
    At that time Ken told Robert to keep him informed and that he would do what he could to see that justice was served on my part and have my head examined if necessary by Canadian civil servants. Since that time I have made Ken fully aware of my circumstances and although he finds them rather unbelievable I still trust him to do the right thing on my behalf.      Nevertheless if Judge Hanlon forces the issue today for me to have my head examined, I will turn myself in to Canadian Law Enforcement Authorities and ask to meet with my old friend Ken Ross not long after my first grandchild is born in Nova Scotia. I have had enough of the Yankee malice for now. I see no need to go to jail again in the USA under illegal criminal charges.
     As you can see my wife Jean forwarded this letter to my friend Ken this morning and she will serve you both a copy in hand before the Status hearing begins today. There is no need for the ADA to swear out a warrant for my arrest. Canadian Authorities have jurisdiction over me and have been made well aware of my concerns for years and everybody knows it.
      I will gladly argue with the Queen on my home ground. Anyone has any questions take it up with my friends Barry Bachrach or Ken Ross. This is Ken's contact information and as you can see he received the same email.
 

Carleton Place
P. O. Box 5100

520 King Street
Fredericton, NB
E3B 5G8 Canada

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From:Bachrach, Barry A. 

To:'McDonnell, Alicia (SUF)'

Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 7:24 PM

My ire is about up here. Trocoli may find herself the subject of bbo matters. She lied to the court about serving me docs while I was representing jean omeara which lead to the sale of a house. I was never served. One of the so called harrassing docs was a package of pleadings given to trocolli by jean omeara not david amos. It was then sent to me unopened.  When the facts come out here, I believe the charges will be proven frivolous and ms. Trocolli may find herself in hot water. Barry.

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 6:40 PM
Subject: FW:

pleasant.
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonnell, Alicia (SUF) [mailto:Alicia.Mcdonnell@state.ma.us]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 5:52 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE:

Attorney Bachrach-  i understand kate mcintyre agreed to this continuance but she did so without my consent and i would have objected-  i am not aware of the next date and will find out tomorrow but just so you know if it is not scheduled to be heard again in the next 30 days   i will make a motion to the court to have it moved up within 30 days-   there are outstanding issues that need immediate attention from the judge-  first, the commonwealth's motion for a competency evaluation; second, the defendant's continuing contact of the complaining witness in violation of the court order; and three: the complaining witness, angela troccoli, has informed me that she does not want to be contacted by you or any other attorney representing Mr. Amos. 
 
I will contact you to discuss another date if it is not within the next 30 days-  thank you- Alicia McDonnell
-----Original Message-----
From: Bachrach, Barry A. [mailto:BBACHRACH@bowditch.com]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 1:56 PM
To:'McDonnell, Alicia (SUF)'
Subject: RE:

so we're all set for tomorrow. thanks. i think the presence of an atty will help this case.
-----Original Message-----
From: McDonnell, Alicia (SUF) [mailto:Alicia.Mcdonnell@state.ma.us]
Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 8:42 AM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: RE:

Attorney Bachrach-
I am standing in for ADA McDonnell this week in her absence.  I am reading her e-mails to assist her and saw this.  If you advance and continuance the case, we would just ask that the time be excluded under R. 36. 
 
Kate McIntyre
-----Original Message-----
From: Bachrach, Barry A. [mailto:BBACHRACH@bowditch.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2005 11:25 PM
To:'Alicia McDonnell (alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us)'
Cc:'David Amos'; 'David Amos'
Subject:

Alicia, since we have not been able to talk, I feel it important that Mr. Amos have representation in the criminal matter. Hence I will enter an appearance Monday.however, I need to reschedule the status hearing scheduled for 6/14 because I will be travelling to a major hearing I have in fargo, nd, for leonard peltier. Could you please give me the name of the da taking your place Tuesday so I can reschedule. Thanks, barry.

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 6:55 AM
Subject: I have been saving this email for just the right time

 Barry this is a draft of one of many emails going out very soon. It should prove you why Hanlon and McDonnell hate me.
 
     The time is now. This email should prove to you all that at least I am an ethical political animal. I sent this email to the following people on November 19th. I argued in it court after I had served the ADA and the court hard copy in hand. The conversation was largely between the second Spanish speaking judge and I that my attorney, Barry Bachrach and my wife met again in Dorchester District Court last week after they crossed paths with Judge Coffey.
     On Nov 19th the ADA Alicia S. McDonnell mostly just stood before the court beaming beet red and struck dumb as usual. The only day McDonnell ever had much to say was on Oct 1st, 2004. That was when she read to the court Troccoli's Bullshit statement that apparently had just been faxed to her. She then quite frankly astounded me by adding a great deal more of her own Bullshit by falsely accusing me of threatening Judge Coffey. Her charges were not only false but insanely ridiculous. She is the one who needs her head examined not I. I could not be stalking anyone in the USA while I was in Canada the whole summer long. Then there is the simple fact that if I had threatened a judge he would have taken care of me immediately. He would not wait for an ADA and another judge to decide to protect him from possible harm. That aside McDonnell was not even present during the hearings I had before Judge Coffey. She had witnessed nothing that had transpired between he and I. She and Judge Hanlon were content to let their underlings handle me until I had thoroughly embarrassed their help and the court with the overwhelming truth of the matter out of the gate. After that their mission has always been to label me as some sort of madman and file me away forever to protect a bunch of crooks from their necessary and proper prosecution.
      Rather than act within the scope of their employment and uphold the law the Clerk Magistrate Owens, Judge Hanlon, the ADA McDonnell and all others involved in the Dorchester District Court matter willfully practiced crimes against me as early as September 3rd if not before. The clerk Magistrate Anthony Owens admitted within his own signed documents that he knew of the FBI tapes. How could he not have known I had given the Suffolk County District Attorney a copy of one tape the month before the Clerk Magistrate broke the law and filed an unsigned criminal complaint against a man not only not in jail but who was not even in the USA. The Suffolk County District Attorney had even answered my letter attempting to explain the clerk Magistrate's illegal actions. Honestly I think they were all shocked that I had made it across the border without the DHS taking me away. Dorchester District Court has never had jurisdiction over me but the Suffolk county District Attorney has always has jurisdiction over the wiretap tapes. The tapes were found in the trash less than a mile from his head office in the mid nineties. I tried to give them to the FBI on October 15th, 2002 but they they told me they did not care about my concerns because they were to busy preparing to go to war with Iraq. I swear upon my seed that is true. I made certain I recorded a statement of that fact in the public record of Norfolk Probate Court as soon as the Secret Service woke me up in April of 2003 investigating false allegations of a presdential threat made against me by the Quincy District Court. The very court that has just ordered my wife and children out of their home based on the fraudulent actions of Trocccoli and her cohorts. Yankees are crazy not me.
     On November 19th I served an Assistant District Attorney, a fairly young dude who always wears glasses with copy of the following email in hand after the court has first sent me to see Judge Coffey just like they did with Barry and my wife last week. As soon as I was called I asked the Spanish judge why I was ordered to the court that day. He looked at the largely empty docket and said had he had no idea and that it was a good question. So he sent for Alicia S. McDonnell to see if she could tell us why I was ordered to stand before the court that day. After a while McDonnell appeared and read every single word of the following email. She said nothing to argue the fact that the charges were illegal and malicious. In fact McDonnell hardly said anything at all except to claim that the hearing that day was supposed to be a pre trial conference.
      Months later on January 21st McDonnell gave me documents claiming that we had had a pre trial conference way back on October 19th, 2004 which was an outright lie as well. That was the day I raised only Hell in Dorchester District Court after I got out of jail and tried hard to remove the matter to federal court. At least my indignation last October finally caused the Probate Court to force Angela Troccoli to file her documents with the Register of Deeds that she had sworn under penalties of perjury that she had done way back in March of 2004. The perjury of Angela Troccoli within the Records of the Register of Deeds can never be erased by any clerk. The book has already been printed and her malice was recorded years after my wife homesteaded our home still deeded in her father's name until late June of this year. Her father's estate has yet to be closed and he has been dead since 1973. Troccoli's associate Neil M. Kerstein had no right to interfere in our privacy whatsoever. Small wonder to me that Hanlon, McDonnell and oh so many others want me in the nuthouse. It is for their benefit not justice.
   
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:32 AM
Subject: Hey
 
( I have corrected some spelling and added a few words. What the hell it is after all my email and I own the copyright. Nobody except a few good friends will even admit the email was sent last November)

Hey Ron, Byron, Kathyrn and Mr. Conley,

      I figure that today may go three ways. The District Attorney will drop the charges now that the federal election is over or he will go forward and attempt to prosecute me or he and the court will come up with some new charges in an attempt to put me away again. This email should off set all three actions. Feel free to surprise me Mr. Conley with a sudden fit of ethical behavior. However I ain’t betting on it.

      Whereas you, Mr. Conley have chosen to not only ignore my legitimate concerns for months but have maliciously prosecuted me and have even had me sent to jail over false allegations of threatening a judge, I look forward to arguing you about just one email with this email alone. However since you and the clerks office have a very bad habit of making documents disappear, I have decided to record this contact with you electronically but give it to your Assistant in hand. I ask my friends to send it around the world so that it is never lost. I have also sent the other emails mentioned by the Boston Police Dept. and your Assistants in their complaint against me. I will print hard copy and present this and the following emails Cynthia A. Robinson as the legal counsel to the Chief Justice of the Boston Municipal Court. She has some serious thinking to do after she had chosen to ignore my call about my concerns with the court that she speaks for. I knew she knew a lot the instant she called me David rather than Mr. Amos as most other lawyers do.

     On November 19th I will demand that Judge Hanlon recuse herself and ask the First Justice Charles R. Johnson to review the matter. I sincerely hope that he practices brevity, common sense, practicality accepts the court's limitations as well as his own. I do not think it wise for him to support Judge Hanlon's actions against me She had no right whatsoever to declare that I very likely have a prior history of mental illness and deny the fact that I had ran for Parliament and have very valid concerns about the Public Trust being upheld.

     I will file a personal injury lawsuit against Judge Hanlon and anyone who stands with her. I already have the documents proving her maliceWhy the wiretap tapes were denied as evidence by Judge Hanlon and your office without examination by any law enforcement authority will forever prove my point about corruption in Canada and the USA. Chief Justice Mulligan, the Attorney General of New Brunswick, the Solicitor General of Canada, Governor General of Canada and a great many others suggested that I give the god damned tapes to you and return I am called mental ill and dangerous? I am not the one that needs his head examined in fact you Mr. Conley are in great need of having your Professional Conduct examined. You are not crazy. You are corrupt.

      I will be demanding that the matter be sent to Congress and Parliament in order to be properly investigated and that counter charges be laid against you and many other employees of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts the City of Boston, the federal government and other States that failed to uphold the law and act within the scope of their employment. The fact that I as a Canadian Citizen was summoned out of Canada by an unsigned complaint by a Clerk Magistrate who had no authority to do so anyway forever makes this a federal matter. That it was done under the warrant of the Boston Police Dept whose very own Police Commissioner Kathleen O'Toole had been made aware of many crimes before even the first email was ever sent to Angela Troccoli's boss, Mr. Schulman makes this matter particularly offensive. The fact that I was sent to jail on unnamed charges that were labeled "other" should cause me to seek a great amount of relief in punitive damages so this does not happen again to others. The fact that I was sent into the custody of the very Sheriff that had practiced Fraud and Perjury against me for the benefit of the US Attorney Michael Sullivan two years ago just served to further piss me off. Clearly Judge Hanlon has no understanding of the Eighth Amendment and the Clerk Owens has done his best to try to cover his malicious tracks and destroy the Public Record in a effort to stop me from properly removing the matter to federal court. I watch you malicious Assistant District Attorney laugh as she over heard me saying that I would be suing her six ways to Sunday. Not only does she not understand me she does not understand how to uphold the law. Now she should suffer the pains and penalties for her malice. Following are a few law and prior matters we will be arguing in the near future.

CHAPTER 265. CRIMES AGAINST THE PERSON

Chapter 265: Section 43A Criminal harassment; punishment

Section 43A. (a) Whoever willfully and maliciously engages in a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person, which seriously alarms that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress, shall be guilty of the crime of criminal harassment and shall be punished by imprisonment in a house of correction for not more than two and one-half years or by a fine of not more than $1,000, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Such conduct or acts described in this paragraph shall include, but not be limited to, conduct or acts conducted by mail or by use of a telephonic or telecommunication device including, but not limited to, electronic mail, internet communications or facsimile communications.

Commonwealth v. Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury Division of the District Court
439 Mass. 352(2003)

** Important case regarding clerk-magistrate hearings **

A clerk-magistrate has no authority to conduct a show cause hearing prior to acting on an application for the issuance of a felony complaint where the person charged is not under arrest.

The Clerk-Magistrate of the West Roxbury District Court scheduled show cause hearings on two separate felony complaint applications. In both instances, the person charged had not been arrested for the alleged offenses. The Commonwealth filed a c. 211, § 3 petition, requesting that the single justice vacate the show cause hearing and issue an order directing the clerk-magistrate to halt such hearings in the future. The Commonwealth's petition was granted and the Clerk-Magistrate appealed.

In reviewing the opinion of the single justice, the SJC looked to the statutes that both define and limit the clerk-magistrate's authority - G.L. c.218, §§33 and 35A. The SJC found no authority for a clerk magistrate to hold a show cause hearing with respect to felony complaints - in fact, §35 specifically limits such hearings to misdemeanors for which there is no arrest. Additionally, §33 contains no provision for an adversary hearing with regard to the issuance of a felony complaint. Finding no statutory authority for such a hearing, the SJC affirmed the decision of the single justice, vacating the hearing and ordering all future hearings to cease. "To the extent that a clerk-magistrate declines to act on an application for the issuance of process on a felony complaint until a show cause hearing is held, the clerk-magistrate improperly interferes with the prosecutorial discretion of the executive branch."

Commonwealth v. Clemens
Appeals Court
September 2, 2004

In a rescript opinion, the Appeals Court addressed for the first time the criminal harassment statute (c. 265, § 43A) enacted in 2000. The Court suggested that, similar to the stalking statute, criminal harassment will require a showing of at least three separate incidents of willful and malicious conduct to support a conviction.

Jurisdiction:

Criminal jurisdiction of the Boston Municipal Court includes most criminal offenses which do not require the imposition of a state prison sentence. If a prison sentence is mandated, the Court may conduct probable cause hearings to determine whether offenses will be bound over to the Superior Court. The Court has original jurisdiction over a number of serious felonies, concurrent with the Superior Court. The Court's civil jurisdiction includes contract and tort actions; cases remanded from the Superior Court; small claims, small claims jury appeals; mental health commitments; summary process; supplementary proceedings; unemployment compensation appeals; paternity and support actions; and domestic abuse actions. The Court also has jurisdiction for review of findings of the State Police Trial Board and equitable jurisdiction in lead poisoning prevention; landlord interference with quiet enjoyment or failure to provide utilities; family abuse prevention; sanitary code; and residential nuisances.

Wagenmann v. Pozzi, 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30752, District of Massachusetts, 1986 decision, upheld the potential liability of prosecutors who convey false information to the bail magistrate which resulted in the setting of excessively high bail which precluded the plaintiff from obtaining release from jail, and further that such prosecutorial statements to the judge significantly contributed to the judge's decision to commit the plaintiff to a mental hospital, citing the next case below

Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 23482 (9th Cir. 1985)(en banc), in which a unanimous 9th Circuit upheld a Section 1983 civil rights claim for similar prosecutorial misconduct (alleged perjury, threatening and coercing witnesses, concealing and falsifying evidence), citing Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 68 L. Ed. 420, 101 S. Ct. 1908 (1981)

Richards v. City of New York, 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13675, Southern District of New York, Judge Michael B. Mukasey, opinion dated September 2, 1998, explaining how prosecuting attorneys can be liable (i.e., lose their full or partial immunity) when getting involved in the investigative area

      Mr. Conley I am well aware that you have many political friends that you are protecting from my very valid allegations of crimes. After I had properly disclosed to you many crimes practiced against me, you attacked me with great malice, You should inform your fellow District Attorneys William Keating, Paul F. Walsh, Jr. Timothy J. Cruz, John J. Conte and many other elected officials that I am going to sue you all after I done arguing Alicia S. McDonnell in Dorchester District Court.

       I am just a layman. It was not my job to inform the Clerk Magistrate, Mr. Owens of the law but I truly did try to byway of his clerks F. Dennis Sullivan and Robert Sullivan beginning in June while I was running for Parliament. I also fully disclosed everything to you in July in enough time to impeach George W. Bush while all the other Democrats were in Beantown. Hell you even answered me. In return you attack Me? Then when I prove your malice Owens and his assistants like Mr. Buckley and all the other clerks practice fraud etc. against me. I am also aware of the federal political connection of the Dorchester District Court byway of Judge Sidney Hanlon and the former Attorney General Janet Reno and federal funding sent to that court to support the torture of men in malicious actions such as this. I suspect it was to support the actions of the political far left in their endeavors to make inroads in the justice system to suit their own ends. Feel free to argue me.

                                                                 Cya’ll in CourtJ

                                                                                       David R. Amos

 

 

 

                                                                                              December 30th 2004

 

Legal Advisor Mary Jo Harris                          Legal Counsel Cynthia A Robinson
Boston Police Department                                 Boston Municipal Court

One Schroeder Plaza                                        90 Devonshire Street, 16th Floor
Boston MA 02120                                              Boston MA 02109

Phone 617 343-4550                                        Phone 617-788-8733

 

    RE: My pending personal injury lawsuit in federal court related to a pending matter  

          in Dorchester District Court Docket # 0407CR004623

 

Hey ladies,

      Beginning in June of this year as soon as I was made aware of the Boston PD investigation of the very fraudulent allegations of Angela Troccoli, I diligently to discuss this matter with everyone involved including you two ladies. I have waited six months for someone to act ethically and uphold the law. Now I quit talking and must sue everyone including you. I must do so promptly in order to regain the lost assets within the malicious bail ordered by the corrupt, Judge Hanlon and the lost assets stolen by Troccoli and her clients while I was in jail. I was never arrested, never read my rights and illegally held in the very crooked Sheriff Cabral’s jail under the charges of "other" in order to have my head examined because I exercised my right to refute the false statements made by the wicked Assistant District Attorney to support a malevolent Clerk Magistrate’s blatantly illegal complaint. What would you do if you were I?

     Thus far this was all done with the support of three judges, Coffey, Hanlon and some Spanish speaking judge no one will give me the name of. On Nov 19th the latter unnamed judge had no idea what the matter was about because the clerk had destroyed most of the Public Record. At least he ordered that the matter proceed swiftly to trial as I demanded. I must sue him too because he refused to return or reduce the bail. He also refused to keep the attached email that I served upon him and the District Attorney during the course of the hearing. He did study it but he called me back after the hearing was over and ordered me to take the document because both he and the clerk did not want it in the public record. I took it after promising to give it to his lawyer, which is you, Ms. Robinson. As you can see you are mentioned within the email dated Nov 19th hereto attached. Clearly it was composed and sent weeks after you had refused to discuss this matter with me when I still had time to remove it to federal court. I did tell you that I would send hard copy. I will never understand why you put me on hold and then were to busy to talk to me yet never called me back. I thought you would surely call once I had served this email upon the court and the DA. This matter does involve my freedom. Two months is long enough for any man to wait in order to be assured that a lawyer is delaying him for lucre or malice. Ms. Harris, the same is true for you. I called you before I called the Mayor’s office in July. If you ladies have questions now, ask your cohorts in the Police Dept, the Mayor’s Office, the DA’s office, the Clerks office, the Sheriff’s Dept, or listen to me on Jan 21st in Dorchester District Court as I argue a couple of interesting motions with whatever judge I meet next.

      Please find enclosed exactly the same material served upon the legal counsel for the House of Representatives two days ago. The copy of wiretap tape numbered 139 is served upon you as officers of the court in order that it may be properly investigated. Whereas Judge Hanlon refused to order the District Attorney to notify the FBI of the existence of the nine original tapes served upon them on September 3rd, perhaps you ladies should consider calling the FBI yourselves. Next year I will quit trying to reason with unethical lawyers etc. From now on I argue with them on the public record.

      I made my last calls today to some of my future adversaries. Ms. Harris the last call was to you while you were purportedly out to lunch. I was directed to your voicemail. I declined but it was one step further than the last time I called your office in July. Whoever answered then refused to speak to me because I was a so-called defendant. It did not matter her that I had yet to be charged or that I would be defending myself Pro Se if I were to be charged. After month or so I did manage to talk to Det. Wayne Williams but only briefly because he told me he had an ongoing investigation of me and refused to discuss anything with me. I told him that since he had already pressed false charges against me, I would be suing him. Maybe during the process of discovery of a civil lawsuit I will find out what other crime he is attempting to accuse me of.

       If the cops had studied the emails Troccoli claimed were harassing, they would have seen the last one was sent to other Police Depts and to Canada’s Minister of Justice. It was mere days before I returned to Canada to run for Parliament. If the emails were in fact harassment, ask yourself why Irwin Cotler didn’t charge me while I was under the Crown’s jurisdiction. If you doubt me then ask the District Attorney to show you the emails within the huge exhibits that were attached to the Affidavit filed on Oct 1st. Those same exhibits and a great deal more will reappear in federal court next year.

       I have no idea what is recorded on the wiretap tapes I gave the District Attorney on Sept 3rd in my criminal matter nor do I care. It is not my job to investigate crimes. I will be filing other wiretap tapes in federal court under seal in a civil complaint so that I cannot be accused of violating other people’s Fourth Amendment Rights. As you listen in confidence to the CD of tape # 139 please understand that either I or my estate will give the original tape only to the fella that calls himself "Al" so that he may sue the government himself if I fail to in my efforts to see justice served.

      A Happy New-Year for me would bring shame on all lawyers. Please feel free to impress me with ethical behavior as per the Rules of Professional Conduct. If the USPS does what they are paid to do this time around, you should receive this material first thing in the morning of the last day of this year. Perhaps you should call the FBI ASAP. Say hey to Mr. Kaiser for me. Tell him I am taking a vacation before going back to court on the 21st. He can forget trying to talk to me off the record next year. If he wants to hassle me let him know I sent the text of this letter to Irwin Cotler and many others.

                                                                     Cya’ll in CourtJ

                                                                                               David R. Amos

                                                                                               153 Alvin Ave.

                                                                                               Milton, MA. 02186

 

                                                                                            September 1st, 2004

 

Howard Rubin, Lyn Crompton                                      Andy Scott

and Greg Delbigio                                                       Minister of Indian Affairs

c/o Terry LaLiberte,                                                   61 Carleton Street

Barrister and Solicitor                                                Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2
1190-605 Robson Street
Vancouver, B.C. V6B 5J3

                                                  RE: Corruption

Hoka Hey,

        Please find enclosed a copy of most of the material sent to two Lieutenant Governors and the Governor General. The copy of wiretap tape number 139 is served upon you in confidence as officers of the court and a Minister in our government in order that it may be properly investigated. I have also enclosed a copy of a letter I composed months ago but never sent and some other information you may find interesting about the political scene in South Dakota.

          Leonard has been a political prisoner for far too long with Canadian assistance let us not allow history to repeat itself with John Graham.

         May I suggest that you all give my friend Barry Bachrach a call, drop my name and then look to the best interests of the people that you are employed to speak for. There is a strong possibility that my actions may embarrass you in the near future if you choose to ignore this letter. You are looking at just the tip of a very malevolent iceberg that we all know exists. No government is beyond reproach once the electorate has been properly informed. Conrad Black just proved to us all how bad things realy are if anyone was paying attention.

                                                                             Cya’ll in CourtJ

                                                                                                 David R. Amos

                                                                                                 153 Alvin Ave.

                                                                                                 Milton MA. 02186

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 

        I, David R. Amos, of 153 Alvin Ave. Milton, MA. on Sept 2nd, 2004, I delivered the enclosed material to the office of Andy Scott at 61 Carleton Street Fredericton, NB. E3B 3T2 and by mail to Terry LaLiberte. 
                                                                          David R, Amos

                                                                          153 Alvin Ave.

                                                                          Milton, MA. 02186

 

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:28 PM
Subject: RE: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?

SURE MENTION ME. CHAOMSKY IS PART OF THE FAKE LEFT. THEY ARE LOSERS.
-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:davidamos@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 3:33 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Has Noam Chomsky ever talked to you?

This really pissed me off. I have long email exchanges with him and when he and Paul Saba spoke in Milton (I had served Saba the same stuff you got at the same time.) I gave the same stuff to Noam's help without a CD recording. The old bugger don't mind running off to Canada to rub elbows with other Canadians he finds newsworthy but won't even pick up the phone to call me. He sure can talk a good talk though. I even had a long talk with Graham's buddies. I guess it is time to write his lawyers a letter do you wish for me to mention you?

 

 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 8:05 PM
Subject: Hey Mr . Irwin why not do the right thing and take your mail?

It seems that CSIS is messing with my mail
 
Sent by last Thursday by Canada Post to RCMP General Counsel Liliana Longo 
c/o Ast. Commissioner Gerry Lynch in NFLD. I have now called NFLD and gave Gerry
the tracking number and told him if he wants to read his mail he should send someoneto find it. afterall he is one of the second in Command of the RCMP and Longo is his lawyer.
Canada Post won't say dick to me about it.
 
To track and confirm delivery of your item, enter the Item number, Reference number, or Delivery Notification Card number in the corresponding field provided below, then click the Submit button.

No records found for specified search criteria: 46227406901
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Sent US Mail Saturday in Beantown all it had to do was go about a half a mile to the Canadin Consulate.
Obviously I informed them but the thing is they don't know who else I told. Kinda of a double check one by phone
and one by email.
 

Track & Confirm


Shipment Details


You entered 0302 1790 0001 6045 5717

Your item was forwarded to a different address at 2:22 pm on September 21, 2004 in BOSTON, MA 02108. This was because of forwarding instructions or because the address or ZIP Code on the label was incorrect. Information, if available, is updated every evening. Please check again later.

Here is what happened earlier:
  • ACCEPTANCE, September 17, 2004, 10:30 pm, BOSTON, MA 02205
      Anyway it ain't no matter to me now Their mail is filed in court for the public to view. If they want to piss and moan about it they can argue me later in court.
They are public servants they should read their god damned mail. The Postal Service has a little explaining to do anyway over the Attorney General Robb Quinan and his Mail fraud anyway. I will just and this shit to it. I knew old man Ronald  Irwin would duck and run but arguing Longo should be fun,
    What I did in Norfolk Probate Court today was way beyond fun it went way better than I dreamed it could. October 1st should prove to be quite a hoot after meeting Angie in court today. I wonder if Longo is a pretty as she is. She looks good in her picture anyway I am certain that she is a damn sight smarter than Angie. Angie is so stupid I almost feel ashamed for making her show me her ass. (Not really I am an ass man)
     Now it appears all the Canadian Boobs have shown me their ass a well. Time to talk to the right Yankees just before the November Election and then head out as planned. i finally got the tape from the New Brunswick Police Commission and I will send a copy of it your way someday Byron. I made sure I mentioned you several times and showed them the documents but I didn't speak of what it was about but everybody will know they got something really kinda big. I did to protect ya buddy. I also mentioned Barry once. I hope Barry called you today. I know the FEDS are likely listening and reading our emails so I recorded it here to protect the both of you and Collen Rowley as well. I cannot afford the time
to wait for her to retire she is more valuable to me as an honest lawyer within the FBI before the Yankee federal election, not afterwards.
      I also hear Jean and Joyse on the tape so it should protect their butts as well. I will order a copy of the Probate Court tape as soon as we can afford it. But it will likely be edited anyway 

 

From: "Bachrach, Barry A."<BBACHRACH@bowditch.com>
To: 'moto maniac'<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:49:51 -0400

you got to be careful. just found out someone went out to pine ridege. totally disrupted a group of people trying to fight the corruption. guess what. bingo, his wife is an fbi agent. i smelled something and told them to find out. in the interim, the work was disrupted as planned.
-----Original Message-----
From: moto maniac [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:47 PM
To: Bachrach, Barry A.
Subject: Fwd: Fw: Something weird going on...FR: Byron

Be careful Byron and I both think this lady is a FED in BC. He just spilled some beans to her on purpose.So that they will make a play against me on Oct 1st. You know what they say about keeping your friends close and your enemies closer. There is nothing wrong with my emails she just said that so that others won't read them.

Note: forwarded message attached.


Yahoo! for Good
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Alex Amos
 
 
Alex Amos
David Amos

Computer Science Student @ UNB | Github @alexamos32

About

As a student who has had exposure to many areas of the IT industry, I have found that I have a true passion for cybersecurity. Whether I am cracking CTF challenges, pranking my friends, or learning to develop interesting security tools, I find that I am constantly working towards my goal of achieving a career helping to protect people and companies from the dangers of the internet.

The global cybersecurity community is an amazing community that I am grateful I have the opportunity to be a part of. I am constantly looking to share the wonders of this industry with colleagues and others in my life.

My skills include Network Attack and Defense, Network Support for levels 2 and 3, and Development and QA in a web-based SaaS environment.

..

Activity

108 followers

Posts Alex created, shared, or commented on in the last 90 days are displayed here.

See all activity

Experience

Accomplishments

Alex has 4 courses4

Courses

  • Data Structures and Algorithms
  • Information Security
  • Network Security
  • Operating Systems I

Alex has 2 honors2

Honors & Awards

  • Deans List (2018-2019)
  • William and Lois Paine Founder's Scholarship

Alex has 2 projects2

Projects





  • member_name

    Anjali Patel out of network 3rd+

    Student Designer at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Building Engineering Co-op

  • member_name

    Dilip Vyavanad out of network 3rd+

    Manager,Inspection Services

  • member_name

    Richards Alexander out of network 3rd+

    Asset Management Intern at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories

  • member_name

    Atakan Inanc out of network 3rd+

    Student Designer at Canadian Nuclear Laboratories

  • Isabella Broggini

    Isabella Broggini

    Associate Commerce Editor, Health at Dotdash

  • Yostena Makram-Donahue

    Yostena Makram-Donahue

    Benefits and Wellness Specialist at Coastal Medical

  • Marg Carman

    Marg Carman

    Chaplaincy/RN at Bethesda Health Group

  • Ayebatari Wills

    Ayebatari Wills

    Program Officer at the Open Government Partnership Component of the World Bank States Fiscal Transparency, Accountability and Sustainability Program in Nigeria
  • What do you like to do outside of work?
  • No alt text provided for this image
  • Why do you want to leave your current role?
  • No alt text provided for this image
  •  
     

    Discount airline Flair announces expansion into Maritimes

    $
    0
    0

    https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies

     

    Image
    Methinks Higgy et al know why Jamina Kotak and her boss Mr Jones no doubt enjoyed my phone call but I doubt their buddy Derrick Stanford did N'esy Pas?
     

     
     

     #cdnpoli#nbpoli

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/flair-airlines-saint-john-ysj-1.5908808 

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 03:03:02 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgy et al know why Jamina Kotak
    and her boss Mr Jones no doubt enjoyed my phone call but I doubt their
    buddy Derrick Stanford did N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

    Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
    that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
    understanding.

    If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
    visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144.

    Thank you.


    Bonjour,

    Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
    quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
    Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

    Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
    veuillez visiter
    www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

    Merci.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000
    Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-

    Brunswick
    E3B 5H1
    Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>





    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Minister of Transport / Ministre des Transports (TC)"
    <TC.MinisterofTransport-MinistredesTransports.TC@tc.gc.ca>
    Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 03:01:28 +0000
    Subject: RE: Methinks Higgy et al know why Jamina Kotak and her boss
    Mr Jones no doubt enjoyed my phone call but I doubt their buddy
    Derrick Stanford did N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting the office of the Honourable Omar Alghabra,
    Minister of Transport. The Minister appreciates receiving your
    comments. This automated response is to assure you that your message
    has been received and will be reviewed as soon as possible.

    Please note that due to the high volume of correspondence, we will not
    be able to respond individually to every inquiry. Rest assured however
    that we are logging your comments and suggestions and forwarding them
    to the Minister, the Department or the appropriate Government Agency,
    as required.

    As you may already know, the federal Health Portfolio, which comprises
    both Health Canada and the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), is
    responsible for leading the Government of Canada’s response to the
    COVID-19 outbreak.

    Transport Canada is working diligently to support the government’s
    response effort with regard to Canada’s transportation system,
    including through measures to limit the spread of the pandemic and
    issues associated with economic impacts on the transportation sector.
    The Department continues to monitor this evolving situation and is
    working closely with its partners and industry stakeholders to ensure
    the safety and efficacy of our transportation system.

    To get the latest information, follow developments and/or learn about
    new measures and directives concerning COVID-19, we invite you to
    consult these links:

    Government of Canada Coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
    website<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
    Measures, Updates and Guidance issued by Transport
    Canada<http://www.tc.gc.ca/en/initiatives/covid-19-measures-updates-guidance-tc.html>
    COVID-19: Travel, quarantine and
    borders<https://travel.gc.ca/travel-covid?utm_campaign=gac-amc-covid-20-21&utm_source=travel-gc-ca_covid-19-travel&utm_medium=redirect&utm_content=en>
    New pre-departure COVID-19 testing requirements for all air travellers
    flying into Canada<https://www.canada.ca/en/transport-canada/news/2021/01/new-pre-departure-covid-19-testing-requirements-come-into-effect-for-all-air-travellers-flying-into-canada.html>
    Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan (Finance
    Canada)<http://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/economic-response-plan.html>
    Transport Canada
    News<https://www.canada.ca/en/news/advanced-news-search/news-results.html?_=1597849598414&dprtmnt=departmentoftransport&start=&end=>


    Merci d’avoir communiqué avec le cabinet du ministre des Transports,
    l’honorable Omar Alghabra. Le ministre vous remercie de lui faire part
    de vos commentaires. La présente réponse automatique vise à vous
    assurer que votre message a été reçu et qu’il sera examiné dès que
    possible.

    Veuillez noter qu’en raison du volume élevé de correspondance, il nous
    sera impossible de répondre à chaque demande individuellement. Nous
    tenons cependant à vous assurer que nous consignons vos commentaires
    et suggestions, et que nous les transmettons au ministre, à des
    responsables du Ministère ou à l’organisme gouvernemental approprié,
    au besoin.

    Comme vous le savez peut-être déjà, le portefeuille de la santé
    fédéral, constitué de Santé Canada et de l’Agence de la santé publique
    du Canada, est chargé de diriger l’intervention du gouvernement du
    Canada contre l’éclosion de la COVID‑19.

    Transports Canada travaille avec diligence pour appuyer la réponse du
    gouvernement en ce qui concerne le réseau de transport canadien,
    notamment au moyen de mesures visant à limiter la propagation et à
    tenir compte des répercussions économiques sur le secteur des
    transports. Le Ministère continue de surveiller cette situation en
    constante évolution et il travaille en étroite collaboration avec ses
    partenaires et les intervenants de l’industrie pour veiller à la
    sécurité et à l’efficacité du réseau de transport.

    Pour obtenir les dernières informations ou pour en apprendre davantage
    sur les nouvelles mesures et directives concernant la COVID-19, nous
    vous invitons à consulter les sites Web suivants :

    Site Web du gouvernement du Canada concernant la maladie à coronavirus
    (COVID-19)<https://www.canada.ca/fr/sante-publique/services/maladies/maladie-coronavirus-covid-19.html>
    Mesures, mises à jour et lignes directrices publiées par Transports
    Canada<https://tc.canada.ca/fr/initiatives/mesures-mises-jour-lignes-directrices-liees-covid-19-emises-transports-canada>
    COVID-19 : voyage, quarantaine et
    frontières<https://voyage.gc.ca/voyage-covid?_ga=2.156756603.1960142909.1610567432-1786117211.1610567432>
    Nouvelles exigences en matière de dépistage de la COVID-19 avant le
    départ pour tous les voyageurs aériens qui arrivent au
    Canada<https://www.canada.ca/fr/transports-canada/nouvelles/2021/01/nouvelles-exigences-en-matiere-de-depistage-de-la-covid-19-avant-le-depart-entrant-en-vigueur-pour-tous-les-voyageurs-aeriens-qui-arrivent-au-canada.html>
    Plan d’intervention économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19
    (Finances Canada)<https://www.canada.ca/fr/ministere-finances/plan-intervention-economique.html>
    Nouvelles de Transports Canada
    <https://www.canada.ca/fr/nouvelles/recherche-avancee-de-nouvelles/resultats-de-nouvelles.html>


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 03:01:27 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Higgy et al know why Jamina Kotak
    and her boss Mr Jones no doubt enjoyed my phone call but I doubt their
    buddy Derrick Stanford did N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

    If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
    support, please contact our Customer Service department at
    1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

    If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
    publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

    Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

    This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
    press releases.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2021 23:01:22 -0400
    Subject: Methinks Higgy et al know why Jamina Kotak and her boss Mr
    Jones no doubt enjoyed my phone call but I doubt their buddy Derrick
    Stanford did N'esy Pas?
    To: dstanford@sjairport.ca, mintc@tc.gc.ca, Omar.Alghabra@parl.gc.ca,
    Chris.Bittle@parl.gc.ca, media@flyflair.com, media@tc.gc.ca, pm
    <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, news
    <news@kingscorecord.com>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, news
    <news@dailygleaner.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
    <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, premier
    <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie
    Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "Robert. Jones"
    <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>

    Derrick Stanford, President and CEO
    Saint John Airport Office: 506-644-8607 E-mail: dstanford@sjairport.ca

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Media Relations / Relations Medias <media@tc.gc.ca>
    Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 22:03:06 +0000
    Subject: RE: Methinks Omar Alghabra and his parliamentary buddy
    Chris.Bittle know why Stephen Jones the CEO of Flair Airlnes has a lot
    of fans in the Maritimes today N'esy Pas Blaine Higgs and Rob Moore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    **Le texte français suit l’anglais.**

    Thank you for writing to Transport Canada’s Media Relations mailbox.

    If this is a media enquiry, we will get back to you as soon as
    possible. Please note this mailbox is monitored Monday to Friday from
    8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EST, except on national and statutory holidays.

    For all other enquiries, please visit Transport Canada’s Contact Us
    webpage: http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/contact-us.htm.

    Thank you,

    Media Relations
    Transport Canada
    Tel: 613-993-0055
    media@tc.gc.ca<mailto:media@tc.gc.ca>

     [cid:image001.png@01D3652B.

    989706F0]
    <https://twitter.com/transport_gc>
    [cid:image002.png@01D3652B.989706F0]
    <http://www.youtube.com/TransportCanada>
    [cid:image003.png@01D3652B.989706F0]
    <http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/feeds.htm>
    [cid:image004.png@01D3652B.989706F0]
    <https://www.facebook.com/TransportandInfrastructureinCanada>
    Follow us<https://twitter.com/transport_gc> on Twitter! |
    Suivez-nous<https://twitter.com/transports_gc> sur Twitter!
    Subscribe<http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/menu.htm> to our YouTube channel! |
    Abonnez-vous<http://www.youtube.com/TransportsCanada> à notre chaîne
    YouTube!
    View<https://www.flickr.com/photos/transportcanada> our photos on
    Flickr! | Consultez<https://www.flickr.com/photos/transportscanada>
    nos photos sur Flickr!
    Stay Connected<http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/menu.htm> | Restez
    branchés<http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/menu.htm>

    ********

    Merci d’avoir communiqué avec l’équipe des Relations avec les médias
    de Transports Canada.

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, nous vous répondrons le plus tôt
    possible. Veuillez noter que cette boîte de réception est surveillée
    du lundi au vendredi, de 8 h 30 à 18 h (heure de l’Est), sauf les
    jours fériés.

    Pour toutes autres demandes, veuillez visiter la page Contactez-nous
    de Transports Canada : http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/contactez-nous.htm.

    Cordialement,

    Relations avec les médias
    Transports Canada
    Téléphone : 613-993-0055
    Courriel : media@tc.gc.ca<mailto:media@tc.gc.ca>

    [cid:image001.png@01D3652B.989706F0]<https://twitter.com/transports_gc>[cid:image002.png@01D3652B.989706F0]<http://www.youtube.com/TransportsCanada>[cid:image003.png@01D3652B.989706F0]<http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/fils.htm>[cid:image004.png@01D3652B.989706F0]<https://www.facebook.com/TransportsetInfrastructureauCanada/>
    Suivez-nous<https://twitter.com/transports_gc> sur Twitter!
    Abonnez-vous<http://www.youtube.com/TransportsCanada> à notre chaîne YouTube!
    Consultez<https://www.flickr.com/photos/transportscanada> nos photos sur Flickr!
    Restez branchés<http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/menu.htm>


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/flair-airlines-saint-john-ysj-1.5908808

    Saint John chosen as Flair Airlines' only N.B. destination, with flights to start in May

    Discount airline announces eight new routes, with flights to Saint John set to begin May 1

     
    Marie Sutherland· CBC News· Posted: Feb 10, 2021 3:49 PM AT 
     

    Discount carrier Flair Airlines announced plans to expand routes to eight destinations, including Saint John, starting in May. (Submitted by Flair Airlines)

    Saint John Airport has been chosen as the only New Brunswick destination in discount carrier Flair Airlines' expansion plans. 

    Announced Wednesday, the Edmonton-based airline's plan is to bring low-fare air travel to eight Canadian destinations by summer.

    Service to four of those destinations, including Saint John, will begin in May, with more added in the coming months as non-essential travel within Canada restarts, Flair said.

    "Flair anticipates tourism and travel to begin restarting in the spring and summer," Flair CEO and president Stephen Jones said in a news release.

    In an email, Flair communications spokesperson Jamina Kotak said Saint John was chosen because of the airlines' focus on "efficiencies and finding a better way to do air travel."

    "Many of our passengers are travelling point-to-point, so they are not looking for connections," Kotak said. "In these cases, alternate airports often provide a better value."


    Derrick Stanford, CEO of the Saint John Airport, says the expansion plan's start date is contingent on the safe restart of non-essential travel, but notes 'We're hopeful we'll be able to pull out all the stops in May.' (Submitted by Derrick Stanford)
     

    'Good news' after months of hardship for airport

    In an interview Wednesday, Saint John Airport CEO Derrick Stanford noted the May start date is contingent on the restart of non-essential travel, including the lifting of travel restrictions on who can enter the province and the vaccine rollout.

    But it is welcome news after months of dire headlines about air travel, he said.

    "It's very exciting news, and it's really good to talk about something positive for a change in our industry," Stanford said. "So we're excited that this is happening, and we're hopeful we'll be able to pull out all the stops for May."

    Saint John Airport has been hard-hit by airlines' pandemic cutbacks.

    There have been no commercial flights into and out of the airport since Jan. 11, when Air Canada indefinitely suspended all flights out of Saint John — and all Toronto flights out of the Fredericton International Airport — amid the pandemic's second wave.

    Rapid testing at airports would be a welcome 'next step'

    The flights announced Wednesday would be from Toronto to Saint John on Tuesdays and Saturdays, for about $80 one way. 

    Two flights a week won't be enough to turn things around for YSJ, Stanford said, "but it's certainly a step in the right direction."


    Flair's plans are welcome news for the Saint John Airport, which saw its last remaining commercial flights suspended on Jan. 11. (Julia Wright / CBC file photo)

    Rapid testing would be a further step, he said.

    "Right now there is only one active airport in New Brunswick with commercial traffic and there's no [rapid] testing there yet," Stanford said.

    "I'd like to see rapid testing available in airports, and I think that would be a key part" of turning things around for New Brunswick airports.

    Other Atlantic airports have urged broader use of rapid testing as well, arguing that rapid testing would cut down on mandatory 14-day self-isolation periods because results are ready in about 15 minutes. 

    The federal government distributed 3.8 million of the tests to provincial health authorities late last year — about 200,000 of which were sent to New Brunswick.

    The province's chief medical officer of health has said they are being used "very judiciously," because there are differences in how sensitively they pick up COVID-19.

    In the case of travellers who are asymptomatic, Dr. Jennifer Russell has said, "the gold standard really is the PCR test that's done in the lab."

    The destinations and start dates included in Flair's expansion plan are:  

    • Saint John, May 1
    • Halifax, May 1
    • Ottawa, May 1
    • Waterloo Region, ON., May 1
    • Charlottetown, June 4
    • Thunder Bay, ON.,June 
    • Victoria, B.C., July
    • Abbotsford, B.C., August

    About the Author

    Marie Sutherland is a web writer with CBC New Brunswick based in Saint John. You can reach her at marie.sutherland@cbc.ca.

     
     
     
    7 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story. 
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Methinks Higgy et al know why Jamina Kotak and her boss Mr Jones no doubt enjoyed my phone call and email yesterday N'esy Pas?  
     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Alghabra, Omar - M.P."<Omar.Alghabra@parl.gc.ca>
    Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 22:03:07 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Omar Alghabra and his parliamentary
    buddy Chris.Bittle know why Stephen Jones the CEO of Flair Airlnes has
    a lot of fans in the Maritimes today N'esy Pas Blaine Higgs and Rob Moore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    (A French message follows)

    IMPORTANT

     Dear Sir/Madam:

    Thank you for taking the time to write to us. Due to the high volume
    of emails that we receive daily, there may be a delay in our response.
    Please note that we give priority to correspondence received from the
    constituents of Mississauga Centre, and as such, we ask that you
    include your residential address in your communication

    For matters or questions that relate to Transport Canada, kindly send
    them to the Minister’s office at mintc@tc.gc.ca<mailto:mintc@tc.gc.ca>

    Thank you for your understanding.

    Media only: For requests from the media, please contact:
    1-613-993-0055 or media@tc.gc.ca<mailto:media@tc.gc.ca>

    For requests from the public, you can rest assured that we will
    carefully read your message.

    Best regards,

    Office of the Honourable Omar Alghabra,

    MP for Mississauga Centre

    Minister of Transport


    ***

    IMPORTANT

    Bonjour,

    Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. Tenant
    compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons quotidiennement,
    il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse. Veuillez noter que
    dans le traitement de la correspondance, nous devons prioriser les
    citoyens de la circonscription de Mississauga-Centre, par conséquent
    nous vous invitons à inclure votre adresse résidentielle dans votre
    communication.

    Pour toutes les questions ou situations qui concernent Transports
    Canada, veuillez les envoyer au bureau du ministre à
    mintc@tc.gc.ca<mailto:mintc@tc.gc.ca>

    Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

    Médias seulement : Pour les demandes des médias, veuillez téléphoner :
    1-613-993-0055 ou media@tc.gc.ca<mailto:media@tc.gc.ca>

    Pour les demandes du public, soyez assuré(e) que nous lirons votre
    message attentivement.

    Cordialement,

    Bureau de l’honorable Omar Alghabra,

    Député de Mississauga-Centre,

    Ministre des Transports




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Higgs, Premier Blaine (PO/CPM)"<Blaine.Higgs@gnb.ca>
    Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 22:03:03 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Omar Alghabra and his parliamentary
    buddy Chris.Bittle know why Stephen Jones the CEO of Flair Airlnes has
    a lot of fans in the Maritimes today N'esy Pas Blaine Higgs and Rob Moore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for taking the time to write to us.

    Due to the high volume of emails that we receive daily, please note
    that there may be a delay in our response. Thank you for your
    understanding.

    If you are looking for current information on Coronavirus, please
    visit www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

    If this is a Media Request, please contact the Premier’s office at
    (506) 453-2144.

    Thank you.


    Bonjour,

    Nous vous remercions d’avoir pris le temps de nous écrire.

    Tenant compte du volume élevé de courriels que nous recevons
    quotidiennement, il se peut qu’il y ait un délai dans notre réponse.
    Nous vous remercions de votre compréhension.

    Si vous recherchez des informations à jour sur le coronavirus,
    veuillez visiter
    www.gnb.ca/coronavirus<http://www.gnb.ca/coronavirus>.

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, veuillez communiquer avec le
    Cabinet du premier ministre au 506-453-2144.

    Merci.


    Office of the Premier/Cabinet du premier ministre
    P.O Box/C. P. 6000
    Fredericton, New-Brunswick/Nouveau-Brunswick
    E3B 5H1
    Canada
    Tel./Tel. : (506) 453-2144
    Email/Courriel:
    premier@gnb.ca/premierministre@gnb.ca<mailto:premier@gnb.ca/premier.ministre@gnb.ca>



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
    Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 22:03:03 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Omar Alghabra and his parliamentary
    buddy Chris.Bittle know why Stephen Jones the CEO of Flair Airlnes has
    a lot of fans in the Maritimes today N'esy Pas Blaine Higgs and Rob Moore?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Merci encore pour votre courriel.


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 18:02:58 -0400
    Subject: Methinks Omar Alghabra and his parliamentary buddy
    Chris.Bittle know why Stephen Jones the CEO of Flair Airlnes has a lot
    of fans in the Maritimes today N'esy Pas Blaine Higgs and Rob Moore?
    To: Omar.Alghabra@parl.gc.ca, Chris.Bittle@parl.gc.ca,
    media@flyflair.com, media@tc.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
    <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>,
    "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "blaine.higgs"
    <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, premier
    <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie
    Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "Robert. Jones"
    <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-flair-airlines-charlottetown-airport-1.5908240
     

    Discount airline Flair announces expansion into Maritimes

    Expansion put on hold last year

     

    Kevin Yarr· CBC News· Posted: Feb 10, 2021 7:51 AM AT

     


    With the addition of the new destinations, Flair will serve 18 cities in Canada. (flyflair.com)

    Flair Airlines will offer service to the Maritimes this spring and summer, the discount carrier announced Wednesday.

    Flair, which bills itself as Canada's only independent low-fare airline, announced flights will begin May 1 in Halifax and Saint John, and in Charlottetown on June 4.

    The airline will add the following Maritime routes:

    • Service to Toronto, Ottawa and Waterloo out of Halifax.
    • Service to Toronto from Charlottetown and Saint John.

    Flair had originally intended to expand into the Maritimes in 2020, but put those plans on hold because of the pandemic.The Maritime flights are part of a broader expansion that includes eight new Canadian destinations.


    Bookings for Charlottetown are now available on the Flair website. (Flair Airlines)

    According to the Flair website, a return flight from Charlottetown to Toronto, including taxes and fees, will cost $98.27.

    Flair president and CEO Stephen Jones said Flair continues to support the restrictions on non-essential travel, but he believes travel restrictions will have eased enough by this summer for the airline to get a full domestic network flying.

    Jones acknowledged there is still uncertainty.

    "No one's got a crystal ball, but we just have to make our plans based on the best evidence that we have," he said.

    "If we don't decide now and we don't move now it'll be too late for the summer, because we need to allow some time for people to book flights. So we're planning now, we're going on sale now, and we're hoping that people will start to plan their summers now with a degree of confidence and positivity as well."

    The airline is providing COVID coverage that will allow people to get refunds or change flights.

    With the new destinations, Flair will serve 18 cities in Canada.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/air-canada-jobs-1.5906896

     

    Air Canada cuts 1,500 more jobs and cancels 17 more routes

    New coronavirus travel restrictions have battered industry

    Pete Evans· CBC News· Posted: Feb 09, 2021 11:11 AM ET

     


    An Air Canada check-in area is shown at Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport on May 16, 2020. ( Graham Hughes/The Canadian Press)

    Canada's biggest airline has informed 1,500 of its workers that they'll soon be out of jobs as a result of new travel restrictions and a dramatic reduction in demand for flying.

    The airline will "temporarily reduce its unionized workforce by 1,500 people and by an as-yet-undetermined number of management positions," Air Canada told CBC News.

    The move comes on the heels of a decision last week to temporarily shut down all Rouge flights, which resulted in the loss of 80 jobs.

    "This is due to the federal government's introduction of a mandatory quarantine on arrival as well as the continued suspension of flights to Mexico and the Caribbean," the airline's largest union CUPE said.

    At least 900 of the jobs lost will come from CUPE members.

    "We appreciate the need for measures to prevent the spread of new variants of COVID-19 in Canada," said Wesley Lesosky, who represents the Air Canada component of CUPE. "But restrictions have to be accompanied by solutions."

    Route suspensions

    The airline is also shutting down service on 17 more routes starting next week including:

    • Toronto to Fort Myers, Fla.
    • Toronto to Boston.
    • Toronto to Washington, D.C. (Reagan)
    • Toronto to Denver
    • Toronto to New York City (LaGuardia)
    • Montreal to Boston.
    • Montreal to LaGuardia.
    • Vancouver to Seattle.
    • Toronto to Bogotá, Colombia.
    • Toronto to Dubai.
    • Toronto to São Paulo, Brazil.
    • Toronto to Hong Kong.
    • Toronto to Tel Aviv, Israel.
    • Montreal to Bogotá, Colombia.
    • Vancouver to London, U.K.
    • Vancouver to Tokyo (Narita).
    • Toronto to Dublin, Ireland.

    "Affected customers with bookings will be contacted with options, including alternate routings," Air Canada said.

    Calgary-based independent airline analyst Rick Erickson, who has no financial relationship with Air Canada, called the news "another serious, serious blow to Canada's air carrier sector."

    The job cuts mean that Air Canada has essentially cut its workforce in half, from roughly 40,000 people before the pandemic to about 20,000 today. WestJet has cut even deeper, he says, from 14,000 workers before to only about 3,500 today.

    Erickson says he was more surprised by the route suspensions, because they are not all to the U.S. and Caribbean sun destinations that new travel rules targeted.

    Air Canada pulling out of those routes won't do much to limit travel, because foreign airlines will likely maintain their service.

    "The situation is dire," he said. "The air carriers have had no choice but to continue to make cuts."

    With files from the CBC's Meegan Read

     

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/10/13/2107284/0/en/Flair-Airlines-announces-new-Chief-Executive-Officer-Stephen-Jones.html

     


     

    Flair Airlines announces new Chief Executive Officer – Stephen Jones

    | Source:Flair Airlines

    Edmonton, Alberta, Oct. 13, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Flair Airlines is pleased to announce the appointment of Stephen Jones as President and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Jones replaces Jim Scott, the outgoing President and CEO, who presided over the year-long process to identify his successor.

    After nearly three years, Mr. Scott has decided to retire as Flair’s President and CEO.  He will remain as a shareholder of the company.

    Mr. Jones, former Managing Director and Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Wizz Air, was selected as CEO and President after an extensive global search. During Mr. Jones tenure at Wizz, one of the most profitable and fastest growing ULCC airlines in the world, he was responsible for operating a 110 aircraft fleet while heading the commercial, marketing, supply chain and digital organizations.  Before Wizz Air, Mr. Jones served as Air New Zealand's Chief Strategy Networks and Alliances Officer and was Chairman of the Alliance Management Board for the Star Alliance.  

    A spokesperson for the Flair Board remarked, “Mr. Jones invaluable experience in building and scaling ULCC carriers through a relentless focus on cost will accelerate Flair’s mission to make airfare more egalitarian in Canada.  The benefits will accrue first and foremost to the Canadian traveler who has been long neglected. ”As Flair Airlines’ new President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Stephen Jones, will lead a dynamic team operating a fleet of Boeing 737-800 aircraft flying to eleven Canadian destinations.  Flair offers airfares that are, on average, 30% below the competition and addresses a vastly underserved market segment with a customer-centric approach.

    "I am extremely excited to be joining Flair Airlines at this stage of its journey.  I firmly believe that Canadian travellers deserve a better deal.  It’s time for the Canadian public to benefit from true competition and the choice that passengers in every other region of the world enjoy. Throughout my career, I have seen the meaningful economic and human impact a ULCC can have on a society;  I am privileged to join the Flair team in their mission to do the same in Canada, "said Mr. Jones.

    About Flair Airlines

    Flair Airlines, Canada’s only independent low-fare carrier, is democratizing domestic airfare to make it affordable and accessible for all Canadians.  Flair’s fall schedule includes Victoria, Vancouver, Kelowna, Fort McMurray, Edmonton, Calgary, Saskatoon, Regina, Prince George, Winnipeg, and Toronto.

    For more information please visit www.flyflair.com

    Jamina Kotak
    Flair Airlines
    780.887.9209
    media@flyflair.com

     

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Media Relations / Relations Medias <media@tc.gc.ca>
    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 04:24:08 +0000
    Subject: RE: Methins Dougy Ford should it interesting that Trudeau the
    Younger wants to deport truck drivers and guardian angels when we need
    them after allowing in an astounding number of illegall immigrants for
    years N'esy Pas Blaine Higgs?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    **Le texte français suit l’anglais.**

    Thank you for writing to Transport Canada’s Media Relations mailbox.

    If this is a media enquiry, we will get back to you as soon as
    possible. Please note this mailbox is monitored Monday to Friday from
    8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EST, except on national and statutory holidays.

    For all other enquiries, please visit Transport Canada’s Contact Us
    webpage: http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/contact-us.htm.

    Thank you,

    Media Relations
    Transport Canada
    Tel: 613-993-0055
    media@tc.gc.ca<mailto:media@tc.gc.ca>

     [cid:image001.png@01D3652B.

    989706F0]
    <https://twitter.com/transport_gc>
    [cid:image002.png@01D3652B.989706F0]
    <http://www.youtube.com/TransportCanada>
    [cid:image003.png@01D3652B.989706F0]
    <http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/feeds.htm>
    [cid:image004.png@01D3652B.989706F0]
    <https://www.facebook.com/TransportandInfrastructureinCanada>
    Follow us<https://twitter.com/transport_gc> on Twitter! |
    Suivez-nous<https://twitter.com/transports_gc> sur Twitter!
    Subscribe<http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/menu.htm> to our YouTube channel! |
    Abonnez-vous<http://www.youtube.com/TransportsCanada> à notre chaîne
    YouTube!
    View<https://www.flickr.com/photos/transportcanada> our photos on
    Flickr! | Consultez<https://www.flickr.com/photos/transportscanada>
    nos photos sur Flickr!
    Stay Connected<http://www.tc.gc.ca/eng/menu.htm> | Restez
    branchés<http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/menu.htm>

    ********

    Merci d’avoir communiqué avec l’équipe des Relations avec les médias
    de Transports Canada.

    S’il s’agit d’une demande des médias, nous vous répondrons le plus tôt
    possible. Veuillez noter que cette boîte de réception est surveillée
    du lundi au vendredi, de 8 h 30 à 18 h (heure de l’Est), sauf les
    jours fériés.

    Pour toutes autres demandes, veuillez visiter la page Contactez-nous
    de Transports Canada : http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/contactez-nous.htm.

    Cordialement,

    Relations avec les médias
    Transports Canada
    Téléphone : 613-993-0055
    Courriel : media@tc.gc.ca<mailto:media@tc.gc.ca>

    [cid:image001.png@01D3652B.989706F0]<https://twitter.com/transports_gc>[cid:image002.png@01D3652B.989706F0]<http://www.youtube.com/TransportsCanada>[cid:image003.png@01D3652B.989706F0]<http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/fils.htm>[cid:image004.png@01D3652B.989706F0]<https://www.facebook.com/TransportsetInfrastructureauCanada/>
    Suivez-nous<https://twitter.com/transports_gc> sur Twitter!
    Abonnez-vous<http://www.youtube.com/TransportsCanada> à notre chaîne YouTube!
    Consultez<https://www.flickr.com/photos/transportscanada> nos photos sur Flickr!
    Restez branchés<http://www.tc.gc.ca/fra/menu.htm>

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/air-canada-saint-john-sydney-airport-atlantic-fredericton-halifax-1.5832712

     

    Air Canada suspends all Saint John flights, and Fredericton-Toronto service

    Sydney also loses all flights, and 3 other Atlantic routes suspended

     

    CBC News· Posted: Dec 08, 2020 1:37 PM AT 

     


    In June, Air Canada indefinitely suspended 11 routes in Atlantic Canada and closed stations in Bathurst, N.B., and Wabush, N.L. (Paul Chiasson/The Canadian Press)

    Air Canada is suspending all flights out of the Saint John Airport and all Toronto flights out of the Fredericton International Airport indefinitely, starting Jan. 11, because of the second wave of the pandemic.

    The airline is also suspending all operations at the J.A. Douglas McCurdy Sydney Airport until further notice and temporarily suspending Deer Lake-Halifax, Charlottetown-Toronto and Halifax-Ottawa service.

    "The second wave of COVID-19 infections is piling added pressure on a sector on the verge of collapse," the Atlantic Canada Airports Association said in a statement on Tuesday.

    "This is bigger than a blow to our region; we could be looking at the end of some our small regional airports if solutions are not found."

    At the Saint John Airport, Air Canada flights are currently the only flights, with one arrival and one departure from Montreal daily.

    The airport will remain open for medical emergencies, the Coast Guard and corporate clients, said Derrick Stanford, president and CEO of the Saint John Airport and president of the Atlantic Canada Airports Association.

    The Fredericton airport has been advised it will temporarily lose its three-times-a-week service to Toronto, but Air Canada will continue to offer daily flights to Montreal, said spokesperson Kate O'Rourke.

    "Service has been whittled down to an unsustainable level for our airports," Stanford said. "Our industry cannot survive and operate in these conditions, and we are seeing the worst-case scenario playing out here today.

    "This will have a huge impact on our region's economy, on the ability of families to reconnect, on the movement of essential workers, and on airport employees and businesses."

    Air Canada regrets impact

    Air Canada said it did not take the decisions lightly.

    "We regret the impact on our customers and community partners, but it is increasingly difficult to continue to operate in this challenging environment, without specific financial support from government, with whom we continue to wait for negotiations to start," a spokesperson said in an emailed statement.

    Passenger volumes are still less than eight per cent of normal "with no horizon for recovery," it said.

    The Saint John Airport will remain open for medical emergencies, the Coast Guard and corporate clients. (Graham Thompson/CBC)

    Saint John came close to losing its only Air Canada flight at the end of November, with bookings looking "quite grim," but managed to hold onto it through the holidays, said Stanford.

    Fourteen-day self-isolation requirements, the lack of a rapid COVID-19 testing program at airports, and the Canada-U.S. border being closed are "just stunting demand like crazy," he said.

    "We can't expect our business partner, Air Canada, to keep flying planes empty into Saint John."

    Stanford hopes that the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccine will help improve consumer confidence to "get people … back to travelling the way they used to travel" and that Air Canada will resume its Saint John service by April.


     Derrick Stanford, president and CEO of the Saint John Airport and president of the Atlantic Canada Airports Association, said he's hopeful the COVID-19 vaccine will improve passenger safety, boost consumer confidence and get people travelling again. (Submitted by Derrick Stanford)

    He also has meetings this week with the federal government to learn more about the funding programs for airports announced Nov. 30.

    "We're hopeful that we'll be able to take advantage of them, so that would be a welcome relief for us who've already depleted a lot of our savings trying to ride out the pandemic," he said.

    The funding includes $229 million in rent relief to airport authorities that pay rent to the federal government and $186 million to help small and regional airports through the "Airport Capital Assistance Program."

    Mayor vows 'all of our energy'

    Saint John Mayor Don Darling said the airport is a key economic driver in the area, with an economic impact of more than $90 million annually and supporting 650 jobs.

    It also plays a vital role in the growth for southern New Brunswick, in the movement of goods and the movement of people for both business and tourism.

    "So that's where we have to put all of our energy and our focus now," he said.

    Although many industries have been hard-hit by the pandemic, the airline industry has been "decimated," said Darling.

    Air Canada is suspending more flights in Atlantic Canada, including Saint John and Fredericton. We talk to Derrick Stanford with the Saint John Airport about how those cuts are going to impact the region. 9:04

    Saint John council will urge the federal government to provide funding to airlines so they can continue to provide regional air service to Atlantic Canada, and funding for the Saint John Airport to ensure it remains open, he said.

    Council also plans to encourage the provincial government to investigate and pilot initiatives, such as rapid COVID-19 testing, with a goal of reducing the amount of time that travellers are required to self-isolate, Darling said.

    The Fredericton airport continues to work with governments and airlines to find ways to safely restart travel while the vaccine is rolled out, O'Rourke said.

    "This has been an incredibly difficult year for everyone in the air industry, including airlines and airports across Canada, the companies that supply us, and the businesses that rely on air access," she said in an emailed statement.

    "Air access is critical for the movement of essential travellers now, and the recovery of our province's economy when the pandemic ends."

    This is the third major round of cuts to air service in the Atlantic region in the last six months.

    In October, WestJet announced it was suspending 80 per cent of its capacity. In June Air Canada indefinitely suspended 11 routes and closed stations in Bathurst and Wabush, N.L.

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-flair-airlines-maritimes-cancelled-1.5596229

     

    Flair Airlines postpones Maritimes expansion

    Expansion was planned for mid-May

     

    Kevin Yarr· CBC News· Posted: Jun 03, 2020 8:43 AM AT 

     


    No new date is set for the arrival of Flair Airlines in the Maritimes. (flyflair.com)

    With the airline industry in a steep decline in the COVID-19 pandemic, Flair Airlines has cancelled plans to expand into the Maritimes for now.

    In a news release Wednesday morning, Flair said previously announced service to Halifax, Saint John and Charlottetown, as well as to Ottawa, would not be going ahead.

    "This is only temporary," said John Mullins, vice president of customer experience and airports for Flair, in the release.

    "Due to the current provincial travel restrictions and quarantine requirements, we feel this is the best balance right now."

    Flair said it will offer full refunds to passengers booked on cancelled flights to the affected destinations.

    The airline had announced flights would start out of Halifax May 14, Saint John on June 25, and Charlottetown on June 26.

    Flair launched in 2017, and describes itself as Canada's only independent, low-fare airline.

    More from CBC P.E.I.

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

     

    Did David Amos get another account, or did his old one get banned?

    $
    0
    0

    https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies

     

    Image
    Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?
     
    The RCMP know the CBC deleted many libelous comments yet did nothing at all Hence the Crown will be sued AGAIN

     

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/cbc-deleted-many-libelous-comments-this.html

     

     #cdnpoli#nbpoli

     

     https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/02/did-david-amos-get-another-account-or.html

     

    David Amos

    Did David Amos get another account, or did his old one get banned?

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/four-new-cases-covid-19-new-brunswick-1.5820677

    Look in the comments for Tony Mcalbey.

    Hopefully he isn't inspiring more nutjobs lol.

    19 comments
    86% Upvoted
     

    I am the real David Amos just exactly who are you???

    User avatar

    Methinks ethical people folks should review what was really said by mean old me and my noname political foes warts and all Everybody and his dog now I am not Tony Baby N'esy Pas?

    http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/11/nb-covid-19-roundup-fredericton-rolled.html

     

    Only a nomind no name chickens**t would pretend to be me CORRECT JOHN GREEN???

    1
    User avatar
    level 3

    Methinks you know as well as I that the RCMP know you just proved my point again in Spades while stealing my name again N'esy Pas pervert???

    1
    User avatar
    level 4

    Not even Johnny “Never Been Good” Green is that dumb. Everybody and his dog knows that I ALWAYS post in my name unlike you shills who steal my name and work for reasons I will never understand.

    YOU are most likely the whacko from Seattle who has been threatening my daughter. Rest assured I have many friends in your neck of the woods who ride Harleys and don’t take kindly to fake gang members N’est Pas?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qbIw6E3iTw&t=204s

    THE CAPITOL CHAOS WAS A KINDERGARTEN RIOT..QUIT BEING SKARED OF LOW IQ REDNECKS 😆

    211 views
    Jan 10, 2021
    92Share
    35 subscribers
    Kicking off 2021 w/ a new channel kuz of bitchmade trolls flagging the RPP channel & getting it taken down now I gotta start all over again but oh well that's how the YT game goes right? LOL Been listening to JB Gunner's streams the last few days & the conspiracy nuts he's talking about are the same ones trolling me now it all makes sense 😆 If u enjoy this channel's content feel to donate here https://cash.app/$206Pinoy Follow me on Parler @Tondoboss1 The Vox Article on Biden's 3 Strikes Law https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politi...

     


    User avatar
    level 1

    I like Amos. His brand of lunacy always makes me laugh!

    7
    User avatar
    level 1

    Methinks we haven't read the last from him n'esy pas?

    5
    User avatar
    level 2

    Worst catchphrase ever.

    3
    User avatar
    level 3

    yeah he's an odd one isn't he? Ahh well, seems harmless and I hope he remains that way.

    3
    User avatar
    level 4

    I believe the catchphrase was first used to mock someone who said "n'est-ce pas?"

    What a jerk.

    2
    User avatar
    level 5

    yeah I'll bet he thinks he is clever but it comes across quite cringy.

    3
    User avatar
    level 6

    Cringey seems to be a prereq for cbc comment sections.

    Makes reddit look like the height of discourse.

    3
    User avatar
    level 7

    yeah I used to comment there years ago but it's like r/canada now.

    1
    User avatar
    level 1

    Half that comment section needs a ban. It's basically just the same 8 angry old people yelling at each other. Surely other than David no one is actually using their real names...

    3
    User avatar
    level 1

    Nope, david just posted. I thought the same thing too that the CBC NB comment section was waaayyy too quiet lately.

    2
    User avatar
    level 1

    I did not know the name, but I immediately knew the commenter you were posting about LOL

    2
    User avatar
    level 1

    That comment section is a garbage fire. I was pretty active in it about 8 or 9 years ago. It has gotten so much worse during that time.

    2
    User avatar
    level 2

    Comment sections seem to bring out the worst of the right-winged thinking. I swear if you only read comment sections you would think PANB was winning elections in landslides.

    3
    User avatar
    level 1

    I enjoy having a laugh at the nutters in the comment sections, heck, it’s fun to egg them on.

    That Amos guy is such clutter, it’s not even worth reading.

    CBC already limits comments on 90% of the topics, I have no idea how the guy can turn a comment section about puff pieces into some conspiracy theory about MLA’s ignoring him.

    His election campaign was hilarious.


    User avatar
    level 1

    He needs a perma ban

    r/newbrunswickcanada

    The Subreddit for the province of New Brunswick, Canada. / Le Subreddit pour la province du Nouveau-Brunswick, Canada.
     
    12.6k Members
     
    85 Online

    Created Sep 2, 2009

    level 1

    I am the real David Amos just exactly who are you???

    1
    User avatar
    level 1

    He needs a perma ban

     

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/woman-still-suffering-from-covid-1.5905620#vf-all_threads-2265900020312

     

    Quispamsis woman frustrated by COVID-19 symptoms that linger for months

    Emily Bodechon has found support from other so-called long-haulers

     
    CBC News· Posted: Feb 08, 2021 3:45 PM AT 
     
     
    PHIL INNIS
    It's never gerry the welder complaining lol
     
     
    Pete Kropotkin
    Reply to @PHIL INNIS: Super witty. Keep the clever quips coming, you are clearly a comic genius Phil
     
     
    Jeff LeBlanc
    Reply to @Pete Kropotkin: hey he types lol after all his posts. In his mind I'm sure he's a real Richard Prior.
     
     
    Tony Mcalbey
    Reply to @Pete Kropotkin: at least Phil uses his real name
     
     

    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @PHIL INNIS: Gerrys lungs from his job are wrecked so he's on a ventilator. He will get back to you. Maybe
     
     

    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Tony Mcalbey: Amos? That you
     
     
    Pete Kropotkin
    Reply to @Tony Mcalbey: What are you talking about kid?
     
     
    Pete Kropotkin
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: Me thinky your on to something ... is it Amos in disguise?
     
     
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Pete Kropotkin: Seeing as how they finally shut him out hes gotta find a way in.
     
     

    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Tony Mcalbey: proof he uses his real name? That was always a big thing with amos.. seeing as how I bet less than 10% do
     
     
    PHIL INNIS
    Reply to @Jeff LeBlanc: I always laugh at you drones
     
     
    PHIL INNIS
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: you need a life pal
     
     

    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @PHIL INNIS: You come here to initiate this stuff.. talk about living

     

     https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies

     

    Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?
     
    CBC deleted many libelous comments this morning but not all Hence the Crown will be sued AGAIN

     

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/cbc-deleted-many-libelous-comments-this.html

     

     #cdnpoli#nbpoli

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-covid-roundup-dec-12-2020-1.5839158

     

    COVID-19 roundup: 1 new case in N.B. as Edmundston enters orange recovery phase

    7 workers at Edmundston Regional Hospital have been diagnosed with COVID-19

     

    CBC News· Posted: Dec 12, 2020 11:58 AM AT

     


    The Edmundson region, or Zone 4, returned to orange level restrictions on Saturday. (Radio-Canada)

    New Brunswick reported one new case of COVID-19 on Saturday.

    The new case is an individual in their 20s in the Saint John region (Zone 2). The person is self-isolating.

    There are now 72 active cases, a drop of six.

    The province has recorded 555 total cases and 475 recoveries since the pandemic began.

    On Friday, the province conducted 887 COVID-19 tests, bringing the total number to 138,121.

    There are four people in hospital with the virus, three in intensive care.

    Eight people have died of COVID-19 in the province since the start of the pandemic.

    Edmundston returns to orange

    On Saturday, the Edmundston region, or Zone 4, entered its first day in the orange phase of COVID-19 restrictions since the early days of the pandemic.

    Public Health made the recommendation to put the zone in the more restrictive phase after an outbreak at the Edmundston Regional Hospital.

    "We have seen a rapid increase in the number of cases over the past week, a doubling of case counts within five days and a positivity rate from testing that is well above the provincial average," said Dr. Jennifer Russell, the province's chief medical officer of health.

    Seven workers at the Edmundston hospital have been diagnosed with COVID-19, and 24 workers are self-isolating.

    Fourteen of the province's active cases are in Zone 4.

    The Saint John region remains the province's hot zone with 33 active cases.

    Exposure notification

    Public Health added three new flights Friday to its list of possible exposures. A person who has tested positive may have been infectious while travelling on Dec. 4 on the following flights:

    • Air Canada Flight 8372 from Fort McMurray to Calgary.
    • Air Canada Flight 144 from Calgary to Toronto.
    • Air Canada Flight 8918 from Toronto to Moncton.

    Anyone who travelled on these flights should "continue to follow the directives given to them during the travel registration process and when they entered New Brunswick," the advisory said.

    What to do if you have a symptom

    People concerned they might have COVID-19 symptoms can take a self-assessment test online

    Public Health says symptoms shown by people with COVID-19 have included:

    • A fever above 38 C.

    • A new cough or worsening chronic cough.

    • Sore throat.

    • Runny nose.

    • Headache.

    • New onset of fatigue, muscle pain, diarrhea, loss of sense of taste or smell.

    • Difficulty breathing.

    In children, symptoms have also included purple markings on the fingers and toes.

    People with one of those symptoms should:

    • Stay at home.

    • Call Tele-Care 811 or their doctor.

    • Describe symptoms and travel history.

    • Follow instructions.

     

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practice

     


    32 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story. 



    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?
     
     
    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @David Amos: Nope. Same as always 
     
     
    View the profile of "Barry Winters"
    Barry Winters
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: Methinks the only thing to thicken here would be the bootmarks on our fierce unethical animal yessy plants? 
     
     
    View the profile of "Byron Prior"
    Byron Prior
    Reply to @Barry Winters: I’d just like to thank the Radar Group for having my back here. I truly appreciate it. 
     
     
    Tony Mcalbey 
    Reply to @David Amos: Higgy hopefully shows up to answer questions he dodged last week
     
     
    Michel Forgeron 
    Reply to @Byron Prior: Byron, can you tell me who did all those posts during the night? I see most of them are gone this morning. Thanks.
     
     









    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Methinks Higgy is relieved to know that my 97 year old Mother who is locked down in the Shannex has not been bothered by that pesky virus yet. At least Higgy can't deny that she is the widow of New Brunswick's Chief Electoral Officer 1972 - 1984 who was a CoR Party member when he was one of its wannabe leaders N'esy Pas? 
     
     
    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @David Amos: So daddy is a bean counter. Whom you go after, and sis is a lawyer? You are special
     
     
    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @David Amos: I’m glad Granny Nickerson is doing well still. Everyone and his dog knows I’m named after both my grandads but there’s also a step-grandad that Papa is alluding to here.
     
     
    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Max Amos: Granny Nickerson loves me more than Dad does that’s for sure.
     
     
    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: And my uncle Scott who is his brother owns a Kia dealership in Fredericton also.
     
     
    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @David Amos: you were upper echelon govt royalty. When did it comes off the rails messy paws?
     
     
    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: I can answer that. Two things. Uncle Brian swimming while drunk on booze which dad gave him and he drowned, and having my older sister. He was also in tax trouble big time so he closed his shop and ditched his ex and my sister and moved to the states where he met my mom
     
     
    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Gracie Amos: Wait. Dad told me Uncle Dale was drinking with Brian that day.
     
     
    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Gracie Amos: I thought via his election interview he needed to experience the kindness of others and hit the open road as a free spirit. Whoooops
     
     
    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: Just like he accidentally touched Grace that one time. He’s a bigger spin doctor than the ones he complains about.
     
     
    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Max Amos: He’s also at least as dishonest as the people he complains about. His record speaks for itself in that regard.
     
     
    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Gracie Amos: but he's sued more people than anyone in human history. He's an "ethical animal"!!!
     
     
    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: So ethical that he owes my mom never received one dime in child support for me or Max.
     
     
    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: Sorry for the garbled speech. I’m on the nod at the moment. What I mean is he never sent mom any support for us ever.
     
     
    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Gracie Amos: so what about the elusive Medicare card? Methinks there's more than meets the eye Gracie
     
     
    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: He never stays in one province long enough to get it back since he’s been back in Canada.
     
     
    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: He conveniently forgets to mention that to his audience
     
     
    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Max Amos: cross country tour of asylums
     
     
    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: That and people he’s trying to mooch off of
     
     
    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Max Amos: Ethical Stress tested Animal. A legend in his own mind 
     
     
    Carlson MacKenzie
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: He's got the multiple accounts deal running pretty smooth. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    SarahRose Werner
    Hopefully Saint John is the "hot spot" in the sense that a cooling lava flow is still hot for some time after the eruption is definitely over. :-)
     
     
    Emery Hyslop-Margiso
    Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Hmm . . . Sounds very warm for pandemic talk.
     
     
    Phil Collins
    Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: Sarah Rose has been blowing enough hot air during the pandemic to heat most of the Southwest portion of New Brunswick!
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Content disabled 
    Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks you and your buddies would not be having so much fun with this nonsense if YOUR Mother was locked down in Shannex in Saint John like mine is right now N'esy Pas?
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Phil Collins: I concur
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: Methinks you should wonder why my reply to the Yankee lady's joke went "Poof' N'esy Pas?
     
     
    Harvey York
    Reply to @David Amos: methinks everybody knows why it went poof except for you  

     

     

     

     ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:31:01 -0400
    Subject: YO Barbara Massey Your wish is my command At least you and
    your latest boss David Lametti and Premier Moe et al can never deny
    why I must sue the CROWN AGAIN EH?
    To: bmassey@justice.gc.ca, "Jennifer.duggan"
    < Jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
    < washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "warren.mcbeath"
    < warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "wayne.gallant"
    < wayne.gallant@nbpolice.ca>, "wayne.easter"<wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca>,
    "Jolene.harvey"<Jolene.harvey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Black, Heather
    (JAG/JPG)"<heather.black@gnb.ca>, "Holland, Mike (LEG)"
    < mike.holland@gnb.ca>, "Waycott, Stephen"<SWaycott@nbpower.com>,
    wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, press <press@larouchepac.com>,
    premier <premier@ontario.ca>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:02:08 +0000
    Subject: Automatic Reply
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
    Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

    Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
    note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
    that your message will be carefully reviewed.

    We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

    -------------------

    Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
    Justice et procureur général du Canada.

    En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
    prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
    votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
    avec soin.

    Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Massey, Barbara"<Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:02:24 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: CBC deleted many libelous comments this
    morning but not all Hence the Crown will be sued AGAIN
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    Please note that I have temporarily changed positions.  In my absence,
    until December 11th, please contact Jennifer Duggan at
    jennifer.duggan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca.

    From December 14th onwards, please contact Jolene Harvey at jolene
    harvey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca or 613-617-6282.

    You may reach me directly at bmassey@justice.gc.ca or 613-948-1463 and
    343-553-2075


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:02:10 +0000
    Subject: Thank you for your email
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


    This is to acknowledge that your email has been received by the Office
    of the Premier.

    We appreciate the time you have taken to write.


    NOTICE:  This e-mail was intended for a specific person.  If it has
    reached you by mistake, please delete it and advise me by return
    e-mail.  Any privilege associated with this information is not waived.
    Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.

    Avis: Ce message est confidentiel, peut être protégé par le secret
    professionnel et est à l'usage exclusif de son destinataire. Il est
    strictement interdit à toute autre personne de le diffuser, le
    distribuer ou le reproduire. Si le destinataire ne peut être joint ou
    vous est inconnu, veuillez informer l'expéditeur par courrier
    électronique immédiatement et effacer ce message et en détruire toute
    copie. Merci de votre cooperation.


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Office of the Premier <Premier@gov.ab.ca>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:02:09 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: CBC deleted many libelous comments this
    morning but not all Hence the Crown will be sued AGAIN
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting the Premier of Alberta.

    Due to the rising number of COVID-19 cases, Alberta has declared a
    state of public health emergency. Mandatory health measures are in
    effect immediately—all indoor and outdoor social gatherings are
    prohibited and province-wide masking is required. Beginning December
    13, places of worship will be limited to reduced numbers, while
    certain types of businesses must temporarily close or offer restricted
    services.

    For the latest and most accurate information related to the COVID-19
    response, visit alberta.ca/covid19<http://www.alberta.ca/covid-19> and
    canada.ca/covid-19<https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/coronavirus-disease-covid-19.html>.

    Workplace guidance and supports to help businesses and non-profits
    affected by COVID-19 are available at
    www.alberta.ca/biz-connect<https://www.alberta.ca/biz-connect.aspx>.

    Stay safe.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Premier <PREMIER@leg.gov.mb.ca>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:03:33 +0000
    Subject: Auto Reply Premier’s Secretariat
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    On behalf of The Honourable Brian Pallister, Premier of Manitoba, we
    would like to acknowledge receipt of your email.

    Please note that this is an automated response to let you know that
    your email has been received and that it will be reviewed at the
    earliest opportunity.

    We encourage you to keep updated on the latest Pandemic information by
    visiting Manitoba COVID-19 webpage<https://manitoba.ca/covid19/>.

    If you feel you are experiencing symptoms we encourage you to visit
    our online screening
    tool<https://sharedhealthmb.ca/covid19/screening-tool/>.

    If you are ill, or concerned about potentially being in contact with
    COVID-19, please contact Health Links – Info
    Santé<https://misericordia.mb.ca/programs/phcc/health-links-info-sante/>
    at 204-788-8200<tel:204-788-8200> or
    1-888-315-9257<tel:1-888-315-9257>.

    To learn more about the current public health restrictions in your
    area please visit the #RestartMB Pandemic Response System
    webpage<https://www.gov.mb.ca/covid19/restartmb/prs/>.

    If you have any questions about the restrictions or the pandemic
    response system please visit
    EngageMB<https://engagemb.ca/restartmb-pandemic-response-system>.

    If you are emailing to report a public health violation please fill
    out our online web form at
    www.manitoba.ca/enforcement<http://www.manitoba.ca/enforcement>, or by
    calling 204-945-3744 or 1-866-626-4862 (toll free) and press option
    three.

    We encourage all Manitobans to focus on the fundamentals to stay safe
    and healthy.

    Thank you to taking the time to share your thoughts with us.


    Premier’s Correspondence Team
    Executive Council
    Government of Manitoba

    ******************************

    Au nom de Brian Pallister, premier ministre du Manitoba, nous accusons
    réception de votre courriel.

    Veuillez noter qu’il s’agit d’une réponse automatique vous informant
    que nous avons reçu votre courriel et que nous l’étudierons dans les
    plus brefs délais.

    Nous vous invitons à vous tenir au courant des dernières informations
    sur la pandémie en consultant la page Web du Manitoba sur la
    COVID-19<https://manitoba.ca/covid19/index.fr.html>.

    Si vous ressentez des symptômes, nous vous encourageons à consulter
    notre outil de dépistage<https://covid19.soinscommunsmb.ca/covid19/outil-de-depistage/>.

    Si vous êtes malade, ou si vous craignez d’avoir été en contact avec
    la COVID‑19, veuillez contacter Health Links – Info
    Santé<https://misericordia.mb.ca/programs/phcc/health-links-info-sante/>
    au 204‑788‑8200<tel:204-788-8200> ou au
    1‑888‑315‑9257<tel:1-888-315-9257>.

    Pour en savoir plus sur les restrictions actuelles en matière de santé
    publique dans votre région, consultez la page Web Système de riposte à
    la pandémie de #RelanceMB.
    < https://www.gov.mb.ca/covid19/restartmb/prs/index.fr.html>

    Si vous avez des questions concernant les restrictions ou le système
    de riposte à la pandémie, veuillez consulter le site Web Participation
    MB.<https://participationmb.ca/>

    Si vous souhaitez signaler une infraction à la santé publique par
    courriel, veuillez remplir notre formulaire en ligne à
    www.manitoba.ca/application<https://forms.gov.mb.ca/covid-tip-line/index.fr.html>
    ou composer le 204‑945‑3744 ou le 1‑866‑626‑4862 (sans frais), puis
    appuyer sur l’option trois.

    Nous demandons à toute la population manitobaine de prêter attention
    aux mesures fondamentales pour rester en sécurité et en bonne santé.

    Merci d’avoir pris le temps de partager vos pensées avec nous.


    Équipe chargée de la correspondance du premier ministre
    Conseil exécutif
    Gouvernement du Manitoba



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:02:12 +0000
    Subject: Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil. This is an automatic
    confirmation your message has been received.

    We recognize that many Nova Scotians have concerns about COVID-19. If
    you are looking for the most up-to-date information, we encourage you
    to visit: novascotia.ca/coronavirus<https://novascotia.ca/coronavirus/>
    or canada.ca/coronavirus<https://canada.ca/coronavirus>. You can also
    call the toll-free information line at 1-833-784-4397.

    If you are experiencing symptoms, please visit
    https://811.novascotia.ca<https://811.novascotia.ca/>/ and use the
    COVID-19 online self-assessment tool, which will help you determine if
    you need to get tested. If you don’t have internet access, call 811.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 10:02:10 -0800
    Subject: Out of the office Re: CBC deleted many libelous comments this
    morning but not all Hence the Crown will be sued AGAIN
    To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

    Thank you for your message.

    I am currently out of the office and not responding to emails at this time.

    All the best,
    Nathalie

    --

    *Nathalie Sturgeon *
    Reporter, Telegraph-Journal | Brunswick News Inc.
    ------------------------------

    Mobile: 506-466-8150
    sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com
    https://tj.news
    ------------------------------


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:04:39 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: CBC deleted many libelous comments this
    morning but not all Hence the Crown will be sued AGAIN
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

    If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
    support, please contact our Customer Service department at
    1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

    If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
    publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

    Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

    This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
    press releases.





    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 14:02:05 -0400
    Subject: CBC deleted many libelous comments this morning but not all
    Hence the Crown will be sued AGAIN
    To: marie.sutherland@cbc.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
    John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca, John.green@gnb.ca, premier
    < premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the
    Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
    < premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
    < premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
    "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>, "barb.whitenect"
    < barb.whitenect@gnb.ca>, "barbara.massey"
    < barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
    < Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"
    < Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>,
    "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"
    < Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
    < sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, Newsroom
    < Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>,
    "martin.gaudet"<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "Roger.Brown"
    < Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca>, "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>,
    david.coon@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, andre@jafaust.com,
    "andrea.anderson-mason"<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>,
    "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "chuck.chiasson"
    < chuck.chiasson@gnb.ca>, "charles.murray"<charles.murray@gnb.ca>,
    "Chuck.Thompson"<Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
    "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "jake.stewart"
    < jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, "jeff.carr"<jeff.carr@gnb.ca>, "george.oram"
    < george.oram@gnb.ca>, Lucie.Dubois@gnb.ca, John.Lunney@gnb.ca,
    "Hamish.Wright"<Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca>, "Mitton, Megan (LEG)"
    < megan.mitton@gnb.ca>, "michelle.conroy"<michelle.conroy@gnb.ca>,
    "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"<kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca>
    Cc: "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, motomaniac333
    < motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Katie.Telford"
    < Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Ian.Shugart"
    < Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>

    https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies


    Image
    David Raymond Amos
    @DavidRaymondAm1
    Replying to@DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
    Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding
    within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?

    CBC deleted many libelous comments this morning but not all Hence the
    Crown will be sued AGAIN


    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/cbc-deleted-many-libelous-comments-this.html


     #cdnpoli #nbpoli


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-covid-roundup-dec-12-2020-1.5839158


    COVID-19 roundup: 1 new case in N.B. as Edmundston enters orange recovery phase
    7 workers at Edmundston Regional Hospital have been diagnosed with COVID-19

    CBC News · Posted: Dec 12, 2020 11:58 AM AT

    The Edmundson region, or Zone 4, returned to orange level restrictions
    on Saturday. (Radio-Canada)

    New Brunswick reported one new case of COVID-19 on Saturday.

    The new case is an individual in their 20s in the Saint John region
    (Zone 2). The person is self-isolating.

    There are now 72 active cases, a drop of six.

    The province has recorded 555 total cases and 475 recoveries since the
    pandemic began.

    On Friday, the province conducted 887 COVID-19 tests, bringing the
    total number to 138,121.

    There are four people in hospital with the virus, three in intensive care.

    Eight people have died of COVID-19 in the province since the start of
    the pandemic.
    Edmundston returns to orange

    On Saturday, the Edmundston region, or Zone 4, entered its first day
    in the orange phase of COVID-19 restrictions since the early days of
    the pandemic.

    Public Health made the recommendation to put the zone in the more
    restrictive phase after an outbreak at the Edmundston Regional
    Hospital.

    "We have seen a rapid increase in the number of cases over the past
    week, a doubling of case counts within five days and a positivity rate
    from testing that is well above the provincial average," said Dr.
    Jennifer Russell, the province's chief medical officer of health.

    Seven workers at the Edmundston hospital have been diagnosed with
    COVID-19, and 24 workers are self-isolating.

    Fourteen of the province's active cases are in Zone 4.

    The Saint John region remains the province's hot zone with 33 active cases.
    Exposure notification

    Public Health added three new flights Friday to its list of possible
    exposures. A person who has tested positive may have been infectious
    while travelling on Dec. 4 on the following flights:

        Air Canada Flight 8372 from Fort McMurray to Calgary.
        Air Canada Flight 144 from Calgary to Toronto.
        Air Canada Flight 8918 from Toronto to Moncton.

    Anyone who travelled on these flights should "continue to follow the
    directives given to them during the travel registration process and
    when they entered New Brunswick," the advisory said.
    What to do if you have a symptom

    People concerned they might have COVID-19 symptoms can take a
    self-assessment test online.

    Public Health says symptoms shown by people with COVID-19 have included:

        A fever above 38 C.

        A new cough or worsening chronic cough.

        Sore throat.

        Runny nose.

        Headache.

        New onset of fatigue, muscle pain, diarrhea, loss of sense of
    taste or smell.

        Difficulty breathing.

    In children, symptoms have also included purple markings on the
    fingers and toes.

    People with one of those symptoms should:

        Stay at home.

        Call Tele-Care 811 or their doctor.

        Describe symptoms and travel history.

        Follow instructions.


    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practice



    32 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story.



    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Methinks the plot has thickened within this tragicomedy unfolding
    within Higgy's circus N'esy Pas?

    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @David Amos: Nope. Same as always

    View the profile of "Barry Winters"
    Barry Winters
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: Methinks the only thing to thicken here would be
    the bootmarks on our fierce unethical animal yessy plants?

    View the profile of "Byron Prior"
    Byron Prior
    Reply to @Barry Winters: I’d just like to thank the Radar Group for
    having my back here. I truly appreciate it.

    Tony Mcalbey
    Reply to @David Amos: Higgy hopefully shows up to answer questions he
    dodged last week

    Michel Forgeron
    Reply to @Byron Prior: Byron, can you tell me who did all those posts
    during the night? I see most of them are gone this morning. Thanks.







    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Methinks Higgy is relieved to know that my 97 year old Mother who is
    locked down in the Shannex has not been bothered by that pesky virus
    yet. At least Higgy can't deny that she is the widow of New
    Brunswick's Chief Electoral Officer 1972 - 1984 who was a CoR Party
    member when he was one of its wannabe leaders N'esy Pas?

    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @David Amos: So daddy is a bean counter. Whom you go after,
    and sis is a lawyer? You are special

    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @David Amos: I’m glad Granny Nickerson is doing well still.
    Everyone and his dog knows I’m named after both my grandads but
    there’s also a step-grandad that Papa is alluding to here.

    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Max Amos: Granny Nickerson loves me more than Dad does
    that’s for sure.

    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: And my uncle Scott who is his brother owns a Kia
    dealership in Fredericton also.

    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @David Amos: you were upper echelon govt royalty. When did it
    comes off the rails messy paws?

    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: I can answer that. Two things. Uncle Brian
    swimming while drunk on booze which dad gave him and he drowned, and
    having my older sister. He was also in tax trouble big time so he
    closed his shop and ditched his ex and my sister and moved to the
    states where he met my mom

    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Gracie Amos: Wait. Dad told me Uncle Dale was drinking with
    Brian that day.

    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Gracie Amos: I thought via his election interview he needed
    to experience the kindness of others and hit the open road as a free
    spirit. Whoooops

    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: Just like he accidentally touched Grace that one
    time. He’s a bigger spin doctor than the ones he complains about.

    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Max Amos: He’s also at least as dishonest as the people he
    complains about. His record speaks for itself in that regard.

    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Gracie Amos: but he's sued more people than anyone in human
    history. He's an "ethical animal"!!!

    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: So ethical that he owes my mom never received
    one dime in child support for me or Max.

    View the profile of "Gracie Amos"
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: Sorry for the garbled speech. I’m on the nod at
    the moment. What I mean is he never sent mom any support for us ever.

    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Gracie Amos: so what about the elusive Medicare card?
    Methinks there's more than meets the eye Gracie

    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: He never stays in one province long enough to
    get it back since he’s been back in Canada.

    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: He conveniently forgets to mention that to his audience

    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Max Amos: cross country tour of asylums

    View the profile of "Max Amos"
    Max Amos
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: That and people he’s trying to mooch off of

    View the profile of "Ray Oliver"
    Ray Oliver
    Reply to @Max Amos: Ethical Stress tested Animal. A legend in his own mind

    Carlson MacKenzie
    Reply to @Ray Oliver: He's got the multiple accounts deal running
    pretty smooth.








    SarahRose Werner
    Hopefully Saint John is the "hot spot" in the sense that a cooling
    lava flow is still hot for some time after the eruption is definitely
    over. :-)

    Emery Hyslop-Margiso
    Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Hmm . . . Sounds very warm for pandemic talk.

    Phil Collins
    Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: Sarah Rose has been blowing enough
    hot air during the pandemic to heat most of the Southwest portion of
    New Brunswick!

    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @SarahRose Werner: Methinks you and your buddies would not be
    having so much fun with this nonsense if YOUR Mother was locked down
    in Shannex in Saint John like mine is right now N'esy Pas?

    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Phil Collins: I concur

    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Emery Hyslop-Margison: Methinks you should wonder why my
    reply to the Yankee lady's joke went "Poof' N'esy Pas?

    Harvey York
    Reply to @David Amos: methinks everybody knows why it went poof except for you

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    N.B. using stale data to calculate COVID payouts, and it's costing some communities thousands

    $
    0
    0

    https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies

     

    Image
    YO @blainehiggs Methinks the dudes in Fat Fred City should not be surprised by Rothesay's windfall N'esy Pas?
     

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/02/nb-using-stale-data-to-calculate-covid.html
     
     
    #nbpoli#cdnpoli
     
     
    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/covid-relief-bungle-new-brunswick-1.5909734
     

    N.B. using stale data to calculate COVID payouts, and it's costing some communities thousands

    Province criticized for using 2016 population estimates for 'per capita' distribution of relief funds

    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Feb 11, 2021 7:00 AM AT 

     


    Federal COVID-19 relief funding provided to New Brunswick for municipalities was based on 2020 population estimates, but the Higgs government reverted to 2016 estimates when it handed the money out to cities, towns and villages. (Government of New Brunswick)

    The provincial government's use of stale population numbers to hand out millions in COVID-19 relief funds has overpaid thousands of dollars to some communities, undercut amounts sent to other communities, and ignored one swath of the population completely.   

    Earlier this week, the province announced plans to distribute $28 million in leftover federal COVID-19 relief money that it is required to forward to municipalities.      

    But it is basing the distribution plans on outdated data, something Fredericton Councillor Greg Ericson calls "very unfortunate."

    Ericson, who is also chair of the city's finance committee, said there have been federal dollars "trying to get from Ottawa to New Brunswick" since the start of the pandemic.

    "The greatest challenge has been the New Brunswick government getting in the way," he said.

    When plans to distribute the $28 million to municipalities were announced, local government minister Daniel Allain said the money would be handed out equally to 104 communities "on a per capita basis."

    But his department used 2016 population numbers, not current estimates, to do it.


    Greg Ericson, a Fredericton city councilor and chair of the city finance committee, is not happy that the province is using nearly five-year-old population numbers to divide up federal aid to municipalities. (Gary Moore/CBC file photo)

    Difference will cost Fredericton about $121,000 in funding

    It's a significant difference in many cases.

    New Brunswick municipalities have added 28,000 people since 2016, and thousands more have moved between communities, changing the population of each of them.  

    In Fredericton's case, the per-capita COVID funding it will receive is based on its 2016 population of 58,636, even though its current population is 64,180, according to Statistics Canada estimates.

    The difference will cost the city about $121,000 in funding.

    Some of the 5,544 Fredericton residents not being counted in the per capita formula moved to the city from other New Brunswick communities during the last five years, and their amounts will be credited to where they lived in 2016.

    Other new residents are not being counted at all. 

    The formula skips over thousands of newcomers completely by not counting them toward the "per capita" distribution of the federally supplied funding.

    Ericson said failing to count every current resident in a per-capita formula is a problem, but he suspects it might not be an accident.

    "Am I surprised there is a rural bias in how the government is dividing the money? No I am not," said Ericson.

    Rothesay is one of several dozen slower-growing New Brunswick communities that benefited from the province's use of old data to divide up COVID relief funding. The town received $8,500 more than it would have received if updated 2020 estimates were used. (Graham Thompson/CBC)

    Only official Census data used, Allain's office says

    Ottawa sent New Brunswick $41.1 million in COVID-19 compensation funds for municipalities last year, part of a $2-billion national distribution of money for municipalities based on each province's population.

    After forwarding $13.1 million to communities over the fall and winter for direct COVID-19 expenses and losses, the Higgs government was left with $28 million to divide up as it saw fit.

    Although Ottawa had used New Brunswick population estimates from 2020 to determine how much to send the province, the province reverted to 2016 estimates to hand it out.

    Daniel Allain's office did not grant an interview request to ask about the use of 2016 population data, but his office said in an email that this is government policy.

    "We only use official Census data for funding formulas and calculations and the last Canadian Census was in 2016," the email noted.

    The use of old data benefits shrinking communities or those with stagnant growth, and penalizes those that are expanding.

     

    Hanwell Mayor Susan Cassidy says the province should not be using 2016 data to distribute money in 2021. The five-year lapse means her community will get $5,000 less than it would have if 2020 data had been used. (Radio-Canada file photo)

    For example, Nackawic is to receive $51,083.08 in per capita funding – less than Hartland, Blackville, Sainte-Anne-de-Madawaska or Nigadoo will receive, even though it has grown larger than all four since 2016.

    Rothesay is to be sent $632,919.89 as its per-capita amount. That's 46 per cent of the $1.38 million Dieppe will get, even though Rothesay's population is just 42 per cent of Dieppe's. 

    Grand Falls is to receive more funding than Woodstock, even though it has 250 fewer people this year, and Hanwell, which has grown larger than Memramcook and Grand Bay-Westfield since 2016, will receive less than both.

    Hanwell Mayor Susan Cassidy said she is not concerned about the extra $5,000 her community would get if updated population numbers were used by the province, but she does think relying on outdated data is poor public policy.

    "The five-year lapse is excessive," said Cassidy.  "There are other methods out there."

    In total, the use of 2016 population data will cost 21 growing New Brunswick communities $480,000 in funding.

    About $191,000 of that involves Moncton, which has added 7,619 people since 2016.

    About the Author

    Robert Jones

    Reporter

    Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006. 

     

     

     

    86 Comments 
    Commenting is now closed for this story. 

     

     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Methinks the dudes in Fat Fred City should not be surprised by Rothesay's windfall N'esy Pas?

     
    Lou Bell
    Reply to @David Amos: Ah , Dave how long since you were cut off ? We were all worried where you were .All kinds of conspiracy theories , including " in the klink " , " COVID " , " silenced by the Me / We Party " , " takeover of the party by Terry / Tony / Jimmie / Rob " you know all 7 or 8 party members
     
     
    Pete Kropotkin
    Reply to @David Amos: The Legend Continues! 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Rob Sense  
    Where is Lou to try and explain this away on Prov or Fed Liberals while passionately defending his spoon buddy. Putting more money into his back yard is so old school sleazy politics. 
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Rob Sense: Good question
     
     
    Lou Bell
    Reply to @Rob Sense: Your spoon buddy D A is back ! You and he can perform your " Spoon River " rendition !!
     
     
    Allister Bannister 
    Reply to @Lou Bell: OK...you just ruined rivers 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Chantal LeBouthi
    David Alward was the worst premier in NB until Higgs came along
     
     
    Archie Levesque
    Reply to @Chantal LeBouthi: Shawn Graham? Brian Gallant? or are only Blue ones bad?
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Archie Levesque: Good question
     
     
    Lou Bell
    Reply to @Chantal LeBouthi: Graham gave away 65 million taxpayer dollars to a close family relative of a former premier . Then Gallant doubled down , attempting to give away an UNDISCLOSED 130 million taxpayer dollars ! Thievery at it's finest ! 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    JOhn D Bond 
    How does this even warrant being a news story. There is nothing underhanded about it, not like any special favors are being given to one group or another group.
    A benchmark is just that a point in time line in the sad.
    To the cities that are claiming they are being hard done by, chill this is not the end of the world or even a material item
     
     
    Tim Biddiscombe
    Reply to @JOhn D Bond: The ones actually affected, NB cities, are rightfully upset in my opinion.
     
     
    JOhn D Bond 
    Reply to @Tim Biddiscombe: The issue is it will never be 100% accurate. Generally governments use census data for many funding decisions just like large businesses do. If 2016 is the last one that is available and published, everyone is being treated equally. Lets not recreate the wheel for something that has been used for years to assess economic impacts, support social initiatives..... We are not talking about life changing amounts of money. Really not material in the big picture.
     
     
    Allister Bannister
    Reply to @JOhn D Bond: i have to say...not using current numbers is lazy...and does it say something to the indifference of government?...it also has established a pattern of how this government has viewed federal money...just look at the mess this government created with the money that was available for public transit....its like every single politician and civil servant has a covid mandate...and everything else doesnt matter....well...you have a province to run
     
     
    JOhn D Bond 
    Reply to @Allister Bannister: I will agree the government has made a mess of a number of things. But this issue to me is a non issue. If only the 2016 data is available to the provinces how would they use something different. It would be great if it was more current. But if nothing is available and distributed nationally, why / what is the issue. It is a consistent path for all.
     
     
    View the profile of "Greg Ericson"
    Greg Ericson
    Reply to @JOhn D Bond: You’re missing the point. The Province should have used the same methodology that the Feds use to calculate the appropriate amount of pandemic funding resources between official census numbers. Statistics Canada information regarding population changes between official census determinations are annually used by the Province. The Province would scream ‘Foul’ if the Feds used 2016 information to calculate the Canada Health Transfer. Changing the methodology so that the intended results support other policy objectives is a bad faith move if I have ever seen one. 
     
     
    Allister Bannister
    Reply to @JOhn D Bond: just last nite on the news higgy was touting that despite the pandemic ...NB was doing better than any other province....he talked about all the people moving to NB because of how great it is here...fact is...they know the numbers...its that simple...they know the population numbers year to year...its being lazy...it may be a non issue to you...but what about the communities that are negatively affected?
     
     
    JOhn D Bond 
    Reply to @Greg Ericson: That is my point, 2016 is the latest full data set that is available from Stats Can.
     
     
    JOhn D Bond 
    Reply to @Allister Bannister: Perhaps I am missing something here. My understanding is that the last set of Stats Canada census information is from 2016.
     
     
    Toby Tolly 
    Reply to @JOhn D Bond:
    yeah
    that's the problem with methodologies
    theres too many
    I guess Eric also believes if the feds say spend money their way
    you had better invest
     
     
    Toby Tolly
    Reply to @Toby Tolly: Ericson that is ...
     
     
    View the profile of "Greg Ericson"
    Greg Ericson
    Reply to @JOhn D Bond: You are correct about the official census data sets’ publication date, but not so much about it being the only statistically valid way to determine population figures between census publications. Both Statistics Canada and the Statistic Society of Canada see value in using the Component Method Formula:
    Equation 1.1: P(t+i) = Pt + B(t,t+i) - D(t,t+i) + I(t,t+i) - E(t,t+i) + ΔNPR(t,t+i) + IMnet(t,t+i)

    This is how births, deaths, immigration, and other factors are considered between census data sets. The Province of New Brunswick uses this when it serves its purposes.
     
     
    JOhn D Bond
    Reply to @Greg Ericson: Greg, you miss the point. If we consistently use this data and the other levels of government do, being consistent is of value. Changing base line inputs to derive calculations is not something that we would benefit from on an occurrence basis. We would be like folks at a tennis match, getting a sore neck as the ball moves back and forth across the court.
    Are there better ways, of course. Should they simply make the change for this one exercise, absolutely not.
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Greg Ericson: If you are the real Mr Ericson I must ask why you don't answer my emails and have you seen my Harley lately??? 
     
     
    View the profile of "Greg Ericson"
    Greg Ericson
    Reply to @JOhn D Bond: If the point of the funding is to support people in the communities where they live during the Covid-19 pandemic it does not make sense to provide funding to where they may have lived 5 years ago. 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Jos Allaire
    Higgs, Blaine, aka Moore, Ron, most incompetent Premier ever! And Daniel Allain is his lackey.
     
     
    Steve Alexander 
    Reply to @Jos Allaire: I agree , but instead of how did we let this happen, let's work together to rectify the situation.
     
     
    Billy Buckner 
    Reply to @Jos Allaire: sounds like someone wants that tax and spend style of gov't back with lots of scandals mixed in, that always works.
     
     
    Simeon Elliott 
    Reply to @Jos Allaire: Gallant was the most incompetent Premier ever.
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Jos Allaire: Methinks many would agree that Higgy's and Allian's former boss Mr Alward takes the cake in the regard N'esy Pas?
     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Republican Party must change, warns ex U.S. Army Colonel

    $
    0
    0

     

    https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies

     

    Image
    Methinks Trump et al know why they and Col. Lawrence Wilkerson never returned my phone calls or answered my emails or my Tweets N'esy Pas?  

    As his Impeachment Trial proceeds enjoy a little Deja Vu 


    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/02/republican-party-must-change-warns-ex.html
     
     
    #TrumpImpeachmentTrial

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/massive-military-spending-is-turning-american-into-a-warfare-state-warns-ex-u-s-army-colonel-1.5738677

     

    Republican Party must change, warns ex U.S. Army Colonel

    Lifelong Republican argues GOP leaders must stand up for legitimacy and for the Constitution

     

    CBC Radio· Posted: Sep 28, 2020 5:28 PM ET 

     

     

    The Pentagon’s ever-expanding military budget ruins creativity and pollutes good leadership, argues retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson — a fierce critic of the 'military-industrial complex.' (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) 

    Ideas53:59 The Warfare State: Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

    The Pentagon’s ever-expanding military budget ruins creativity and pollutes good leadership, argues retired Col. Lawrence Wilkerson — a fierce critic of the 'military-industrial complex.' (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images) 

    In his 1961 farewell address, President Dwight Eisenhower cautioned the United States against "unwarranted influence"— what he saw as an alarming alignment of corporate interests with military operations, a relationship he famously called: "the military-industrial complex."

    Since then, the term has largely been taken up by the political left in its critique of America's militarism, and how vast military expenditures end up creating conflicts they're supposed to resolve.

    But Col. Lawrence Wilkerson is firmly on the political right. He spent over 30 years in the U.S. Army, was chief of staff for former Secretary of State, General Colin Powell, and is a lifelong Republican. 

    Today we have become what Eisenhower's worst nightmare predicted in his farewell address.
    - Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

    He believes that Eisenhower was right, and is a fierce critic of the military-industrial complex. Or what he calls "the warfare state," an obvious play on "welfare state." He believes military spending has become an ideological article of faith on the political right —and it is ruining America.

    "Today we have become what Eisenhower's worst nightmare predicted in his farewell address. We've become beholden to that complex, that this year [2019] marked its greatest year in history. It sold more weapons than anybody else in the world, at a greater total billion dollar figure than ever before," says Wilkerson in conversation with host, Nahlah Ayed.

    "We are the merchants of death for seven billion people."


    As we peer into society's future, we – you and I, and our government – must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering for our own ease and convenience the precious resources of tomorrow.’ From former U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower’s 1961 farewell address. (Evening Standard/Getty Images)

    Col. Wilkerson has seen firsthand how military expenditures create a devastating feedback loop with politics.

    "The country marches on to yet another war, another trillion dollar fiasco, another bloodbath for young men and women who are signed up because they were bribed to do so," says Col. Wilkerson.

    He says "bribed" unapologetically, as the U.S. military relies disproportionately on personnel from have-not states to fill its ranks.

    The expenditures, however, don't benefit the troops.

    "The divorce rate: off the charts in the services now. Suicide rate: off the charts in the services now. More post-traumatic stress then you'd ever imagine," Col. Wilkerson explains, adding that the expenditures end up benefiting the warfare state.

    "We had never had a standing industrial base for war.  Now it eats us alive. Not only does it produce F-35 strike fighters, that cost $135 million, a million dollars for the helmet the pilot wears, but they don't work."

    Militarism hurts the military

    Col. Wilkerson notes that many Americans believe that the U.S. is under perpetual threat. The result is that massive military spending gets justified publicly "on the backs of the soldiers, and the sailors, Marines, and airmen and so forth." 

    "That's why you see presidents array military tapestries behind themselves all the time … they like to have the military prop behind them."

    But the astronomical costs aren't simply fiscal, according to Col. Wilkerson. They're also political. 

    "We are almost $22 trillion in debt right now. We've not been this far in debt since the last year of World War Two. We have printed trillions of dollars that have absolutely nothing behind them but the might of the U.S. military and our willingness to bash people who might object to buying our treasury bonds" Col. Wilkerson remarks.

    "This is a comeuppance that is brewing.


    Col. Wilkerson has become a vocal critic of the Iraq War since his own involvement working on the pro-war presentation at the U.N. with former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell, pictured. ( Mario Tama/Getty Images)

    He predicts massive reductions in the Defense Department's budget. Reports from the Congressional Budget Office suggest that by 2030, the defense budget will seriously impede expenditures for other fixed spending in the federal budget — like Medicare and Social Security — and that the impact will be catastrophic.

    "By 2030, we'll have no federal dollars for anything other than the military and entitlements. That's a very foreboding future, fiscally."

    A reforming Republican

    As a lifelong member of the Republican party, just like his father, Col. Wilkerson has been criticized by fellow party members and Pentagon generals. But his hope for the future of the party lies in the growing number of younger Republicans he's met.

    "That demographic is going to be most loudly heard in this coming election, for the first time in our history," Col. Wilkerson tells Ayed.

    "We have the greatest maldistribution of wealth in America right now that we've ever had, worse than 1929. So this is an awakening within the Republican party. It's nascent right now."

    The challenge is waking Americans up. We are losing our democracy, if we haven't already lost it.
    - Col. Lawrence Wilkerson

    The former aide to Colin Powell believes that political reform is needed across the board. Getting rid of the Electoral College. Overhauling Congress. And just as he'd like to see the future of the Republican party empowered by younger people, he suggests the same for the Democrats.

    "I'd get rid of [House Speaker Nancy] Pelosi. I'd get rid of [Senate Minority Leader Chuck] Schumer. I'd get rid of Mitch McConnell. I'd get rid of all the people who have been around far too long, garnered far too much power, have too much influence over their own parties."

    But he's under no illusion how tough it will be to do all this.

    "The challenge is waking Americans up. We are losing our democracy, if we haven't already lost it."

    Col. Lawrence Wilkerson teaches government and public policy at The College of William and Mary in Virginia. This episode was based on a public talk he gave at the Peace Action Maine Spring Gathering in 2019.

    * This episode was produced by Danielle Duval and Greg Kelly.

     

     

    680 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story. 

     

     

    David Amos
    Content disabled
    Trust that I will do my best to try to talk to Col. Lawrence Wilkerson personally
     

     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    André Carrel
    What Col. Wilkerson said about the two political parties in the US applies, albeit to a lesser degree, to our own political parties as well.
    We are at a point where party leaders define what the party stands for, and, once in power, it is the party leader, with the PMO being the principle vehicle, who controls parliament.
    Not as bad (yet) as the US, but travelling on the same track in terms of the concentration of power in the establishment of our major political parties, all of them.
     
     
    David Amos
    Reply to @André Carrel: Oh So True However beware of Pied Pipers Col. Wilkerson is not telling us anything our Veteran Fathers (RIP) didn't already know since Ike was the Yankee President
     
     
    David Amos
    Reply to @David Amos: Remember what Diefenbaker did with the Avro Arrow and where a lot of our best engineers etc went?

    Methinks he liked Ike too N'esy Pas?
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    David Amos
    Methinks Trump et el know why Col. Lawrence Wilkerson never returned my phone call or answered my emails or even my Tweet N'esy Pas?
     
     
    John Valente
    Reply to @David Amos: Elvis had a Col. Parker has a manager. Chickens have a Col. Sanders...
     
     
    David Amos
    Reply to @John Valente: My favourite is CoL Proudy

    Leroy Fletcher Prouty (January 24, 1917 – June 5, 2001)[1] served as Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President John F. Kennedy. A former colonel in the United States Air Force, he retired from military service to become a bank executive. He subsequently became a critic of U.S. foreign policy, particularly the covert activities of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) about which he had considerable inside knowledge. Prouty was the inspiration for the character "Mr. X" in Oliver Stone's film JFK.
     

    https://wm.edu/as/government/faculty-directory/wilkerson_l.php



    Lawrence Wilkerson

    Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Government and Public Policy

    Office: Tyler 423, Mobile & txts (703) 624-9148
    Emaillbwilk@wm.edu
    Campus Office Hours: Mondays 8 - 11 am & 2 - 4 pm
    Virtual Office Hours: email to book: Tuesdays - Fridays 8 am - 4 pm

    Background

    Lawrence Wilkerson's last positions in government were as Secretary of State Colin Powell's Chief of Staff (2002-05), Associate Director of the State Department's Policy Planning staff under the directorship of Ambassador Richard N. Haass, and member of that staff responsible for East Asia and the Pacific, political-military and legislative affairs (2001-02). Before serving at the State Department, Wilkerson served 31 years in the U.S. Army. During that time, he was a member of the faculty of the U.S. Naval War College (1987 to 1989), Special Assistant to General Powell when he was Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (1989-93), and Director and Deputy Director of the U.S. Marine Corps War College at Quantico, Virginia (1993-97). Wilkerson retired from active service in 1997 as a colonel, and began work as an advisor to General Powell. He has also taught national security affairs in the Honors Program at the George Washington University.  He is currently working on a book about the first George W. Bush administration.

     

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 09:25:46 -0300
    Subject: Re: Attn Col. Lawrence Wilkerson Here is a little proof of what I said in my voicemail is true Ask Roger W. Ferguson Jr. and his cohorts He is found on Page 11 of my old file called "Cross Border
    To: Peggy Mason <pmason@rideauinstitute.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Perhaps we should finally talk?



    On 9/29/20, Peggy Mason <pmason@rideauinstitute.ca> wrote:
    > Dear David,
    >
    > Thank you for sending the link to the CBC Ideas programme featuring Col.
    > Wilkerson, which I had missed. He is an important voice.
    >
    > Onward!
    > Peggy
    >
    > Peggy Mason
    >
    > President/ Présidente,
    > L’Institut Rideau Institute,
    > PO Box 11312, Ottawa H, Nepean ON K2H 7V1; Office Manager: 613-565-9449;
    > MASON HOME OFFICE TEL: 613-722-5237; (Our covid-induced move to home offices
    > was made permanent on 1 August 2020).
    > cell: 613-612-6360
    > pmason@rideauinstitute.ca; rideauinstitute.ca
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > The only means we have right now to fight coronavirus is our own behaviour.
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Sent: September 28, 2020 8:17 PM
    > To: lbwilk@wm.edu; annette.nazareth@davispolk.com;

    > linda.thomsen@davispolk.com; cpeterson@tiaa-cref.org;

    > mackintoshs@group30.org; theharlemtimes@gmail.com;
    > pjackson@theharlemtimes.com; LANEYR@stifel.com; pmason@rideauinstitute.ca;
    > blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>; premier <premier@ontario.ca>; djtjr
    > <djtjr@trumporg.com>; press@trump.org; Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca; PETER.MACKAY
    > <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>; Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>;
    > Nathalie Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>; steve.murphy
    > <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>; washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>;
    > Brenda.Lucki <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; sylvie.gadoury
    > <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>
    > Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    > Subject: Attn Col. Lawrence Wilkerson Here is a little proof of what I said
    > in my voicemail is true Ask Roger W. Ferguson Jr. and his cohorts He is
    > found on Page 11 of my old file called "Cross Border
    >
    > https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
    >
    > David Raymond Amos
    > @DavidRayAmos
    > Replying to
    > @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews  and 49 others
    > Trust that I will do my best to try to talk to Col. Lawrence Wilkerson
    > personally
    >
    > https://wm.edu/as/government/faculty-directory/wilkerson_l.php
    >
    >
    >  #cdnpoli #nbpoli
    >
    >
    > https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/massive-military-spending-is-turning-american-into-a-warfare-state-warns-ex-u-s-army-colonel-1.5738677
    >
    > Massive military spending is turning America into a 'warfare state,'
    > warns ex U.S. Army Colonel
    >
    > 'We are the merchants of death for seven billion people,' says Col.
    > Lawrence Wilkerson
    > CBC Radio · Posted: Sep 28, 2020 5:28 PM ET
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Lawrence Wilkerson
    > Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Government and Public Policy
    >
    > Office: Tyler 423, Mobile & txts (703) 624-9148
    > Email: lbwilk@wm.edu
    >
    >
    > https://www.scribd.com/doc/265620671/Cross-Border-Txt
    >
    >
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
    >>> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
    >>> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
    >>> of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
    >>> Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
    >>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
    >>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
    >>> directed to 646-853-0114.
    >>> ______________________________
    __
    >>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
    >>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
    >>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
    >>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
    >>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
    >>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
    >>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
    >>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
    >>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
    >>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
    >>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
    >>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
    >>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
    >>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
    >>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
    >>> Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
    >>> signature under applicable law.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
    >>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
    >>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
    >>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>> Mr. Amos,
    >>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
    >>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
    >>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
    >>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
    >>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
    >>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
    >>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
    >>>
    >>> Department of Justice
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
    >>> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
    >>> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
    >>> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
    >>> did she take all four copies?
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
    >>> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
    >>> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
    >>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
    >>> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
    >>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>>
    >>> I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
    >>> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
    >>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
    >>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>>
    >>>> Good Day Sir
    >>>>
    >>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
    >>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
    >>>>
    >>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
    >>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
    >>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
    >>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
    >>>>
    >>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
    >>>> suggested that you study closely.
    >>>>
    >>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
    >>>>
    >>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>>>
    >>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
    >>>>
    >>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>>>
    >>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>>>
    >>>> April 3rd, 2017
    >>>>
    >>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
    >>>>
    >>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> The only hearing thus far
    >>>>
    >>>> May 24th, 2017
    >>>>
    >>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
    >>>>
    >>>> Date: 20151223
    >>>>
    >>>> Docket: T-1557-15
    >>>>
    >>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
    >>>>
    >>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
    >>>>
    >>>> BETWEEN:
    >>>>
    >>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >>>>
    >>>> Plaintiff
    >>>>
    >>>> and
    >>>>
    >>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>>>
    >>>> Defendant
    >>>>
    >>>> ORDER
    >>>>
    >>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
    >>>> December 14, 2015)
    >>>>
    >>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
    >>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
    >>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
    >>>> in its entirety.
    >>>>
    >>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
    >>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
    >>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
    >>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
    >>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
    >>>> he stated:
    >>>>
    >>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
    >>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
    >>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
    >>>>
    >>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
    >>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
    >>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
    >>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
    >>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
    >>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
    >>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
    >>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
    >>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
    >>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
    >>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
    >>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
    >>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
    >>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
    >>>> Police.
    >>>>
    >>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
    >>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
    >>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
    >>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
    >>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
    >>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
    >>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
    >>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
    >>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
    >>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
    >>>> is no order as to costs.
    >>>>
    >>>> “B. Richard Bell”
    >>>> Judge
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
    >>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
    >>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
    >>>>
    >>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
    >>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
    >>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
    >>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
    >>>>
    >>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
    >>>> most
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
    >>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
    >>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
    >>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
    >>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
    >>>> dudes are way past too late
    >>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>>
    >>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
    >>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >>>>
    >>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
    >>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >>>>
    >>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
    >>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >>>>
    >>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
    >>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >>>>
    >>>> Thank you,
    >>>>
    >>>> Merci ,
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    >>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    >>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    >>>> five years after he began his bragging:
    >>>>
    >>>> January 13, 2015
    >>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >>>>
    >>>> December 8, 2014
    >>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >>>>
    >>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
    >>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    >>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
    >>>>
    >>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
    >>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
    >>>>
    >>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
    >>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
    >>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
    >>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
    >>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
    >>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
    >>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
    >>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
    >>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
    >>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
    >>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
    >>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
    >>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
    >>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
    >>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
    >>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
    >>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
    >>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
    >>>> campaign of 2006.
    >>>>
    >>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
    >>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
    >>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
    >>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
    >>>>
    >>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
    >>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
    >>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
    >>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
    >>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
    >>>>
    >>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
    >>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
    >>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
    >>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
    >>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
    >>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
    >>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
    >>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
    >>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
    >>>>
    >>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
    >>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
    >>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
    >>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
    >>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
    >>>>
    >>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
    >>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
    >>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
    >>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
    >>>>
    >>>> Subject:
    >>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
    >>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
    >>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>>>
    >>>> January 30, 2007
    >>>>
    >>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
    >>>>
    >>>> Mr. David Amos
    >>>>
    >>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
    >>>>
    >>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
    >>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
    >>>>
    >>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
    >>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
    >>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
    >>>>
    >>>> Sincerely,
    >>>>
    >>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
    >>>> Minister of Health
    >>>>
    >>>> CM/cb
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
    >>>>
    >>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
    >>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
    >>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
    >>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
    >>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
    >>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
    >>>>
    >>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
    >>>>
    >>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
    >>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
    >>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
    >>>>
    >>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
    >>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
    >>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
    >>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
    >>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
    >>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
    >>>>
    >>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
    >>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
    >>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
    >>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
    >>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
    >>>>
    >>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
    >>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
    >>>>
    >>>>  Sincerely,
    >>>>
    >>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
    >>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
    >>>> Traffic Services NCO
    >>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
    >>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
    >>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
    >>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
    >>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
    >>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
    >>>> fax: 506-444-5224
    >>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
    >>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
    >>>>
    >>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
    >>>> ilian.html
    >>>>
    >>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
    >>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
    >>>>>
    >>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
    >>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
    >>>>> cards?
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
    >>>>> 6
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
    >>>>>
    >>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
    >>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
    >>>>> United States Senate
    >>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
    >>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
    >>>>> Washington, DC 20510
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
    >>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
    >>>>> raised in the attached letter.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
    >>>>> tapes.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> Very truly yours,
    >>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
    >>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
    >>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
    >>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
    >>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
    >>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
    >>> The Supreme Court
    >>>
    >>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    >>>
    >>> Amos v. Canada
    >>> Court (s) Database
    >>>
    >>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    >>> Date
    >>>
    >>> 2017-10-30
    >>> Neutral citation
    >>>
    >>> 2017 FCA 213
    >>> File numbers
    >>>
    >>> A-48-16
    >>> Date: 20171030
    >>>
    >>> Docket: A-48-16
    >>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    >>> CORAM:
    >>>
    >>> WEBB J.A.
    >>> NEAR J.A.
    >>> GLEASON J.A.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> BETWEEN:
    >>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
    >>> (and formally Appellant)
    >>> and
    >>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
    >>> (and formerly Respondent)
    >>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
    >>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
    >>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
    >>>
    >>> THE COURT
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Date: 20171030
    >>>
    >>> Docket: A-48-16
    >>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    >>> CORAM:
    >>>
    >>> WEBB J.A.
    >>> NEAR J.A.
    >>> GLEASON J.A.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> BETWEEN:
    >>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
    >>> (and formally Appellant)
    >>> and
    >>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
    >>> (and formerly Respondent)
    >>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
    >>>
    >>> I.                    Introduction
    >>>
    >>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
    >>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
    >>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
    >>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
    >>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
    >>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
    >>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
    >>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
    >>> (Claim at para. 96).
    >>>
    >>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
    >>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
    >>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
    >>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
    >>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
    >>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
    >>> Prothontary’s Order).
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
    >>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
    >>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
    >>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
    >>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
    >>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
    >>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
    >>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
    >>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
    >>> cross-appeal.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
    >>>
    >>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
    >>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
    >>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
    >>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
    >>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
    >>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
    >>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
    >>> several judges but did not name those judges.
    >>>
    >>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
    >>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
    >>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
    >>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
    >>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
    >>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
    >>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
    >>> c. F-7:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
    >>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
    >>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
    >>> Appeal.
    >>> […]
    >>>
    >>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
    >>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
    >>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
    >>> […]
    >>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
    >>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
    >>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
    >>>
    >>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
    >>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
    >>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
    >>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
    >>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
    >>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
    >>> section.
    >>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
    >>> that:
    >>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    >>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
    >>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
    >>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
    >>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
    >>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    >>>
    >>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
    >>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
    >>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
    >>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
    >>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
    >>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
    >>> matière civile et pénale.
    >>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    >>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
    >>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
    >>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
    >>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
    >>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    >>>
    >>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
    >>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
    >>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
    >>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
    >>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
    >>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
    >>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
    >>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
    >>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
    >>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
    >>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
    >>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
    >>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
    >>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
    >>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
    >>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
    >>> appeal book.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
    >>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
    >>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
    >>> conflict in any matter related to him.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
    >>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
    >>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
    >>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
    >>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
    >>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
    >>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
    >>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
    >>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
    >>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
    >>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
    >>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
    >>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
    >>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
    >>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
    >>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
    >>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
    >>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
    >>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
    >>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
    >>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
    >>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
    >>> such judge had a conflict.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
    >>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
    >>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
    >>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
    >>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
    >>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
    >>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
    >>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
    >>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
    >>> was a member of such firm.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
    >>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
    >>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
    >>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
    >>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
    >>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
    >>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
    >>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
    >>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
    >>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
    >>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
    >>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
    >>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
    >>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
    >>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
    >>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
    >>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
    >>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
    >>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
    >>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
    >>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
    >>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
    >>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
    >>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
    >>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
    >>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
    >>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
    >>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
    >>> apprehension of bias:
    >>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
    >>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
    >>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
    >>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
    >>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
    >>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
    >>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
    >>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
    >>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
    >>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
    >>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
    >>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
    >>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
    >>>
    >>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
    >>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
    >>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
    >>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
    >>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
    >>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
    >>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
    >>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
    >>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
    >>> (4th) 193).
    >>>
    >>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
    >>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
    >>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
    >>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
    >>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
    >>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
    >>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
    >>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
    >>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
    >>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
    >>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
    >>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
    >>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
    >>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
    >>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
    >>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
    >>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
    >>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
    >>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
    >>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
    >>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
    >>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
    >>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
    >>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
    >>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
    >>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
    >>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
    >>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
    >>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
    >>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
    >>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
    >>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
    >>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
    >>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
    >>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
    >>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
    >>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
    >>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
    >>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
    >>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
    >>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
    >>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
    >>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
    >>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
    >>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
    >>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
    >>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
    >>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
    >>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
    >>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
    >>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
    >>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
    >>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
    >>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
    >>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
    >>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
    >>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
    >>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
    >>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
    >>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
    >>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
    >>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
    >>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
    >>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
    >>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
    >>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
    >>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
    >>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
    >>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
    >>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
    >>> events from over a decade ago.
    >>> (emphasis added)
    >>>
    >>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
    >>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
    >>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
    >>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
    >>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
    >>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
    >>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
    >>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
    >>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
    >>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
    >>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
    >>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
    >>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
    >>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
    >>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
    >>> Webb hearing this appeal.
    >>>
    >>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
    >>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
    >>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
    >>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
    >>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
    >>>
    >>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
    >>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
    >>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
    >>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
    >>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
    >>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
    >>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
    >>>
    >>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
    >>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
    >>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
    >>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
    >>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
    >>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
    >>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
    >>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
    >>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
    >>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
    >>>
    >>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
    >>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
    >>> to recuse himself.
    >>>
    >>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
    >>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
    >>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
    >>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
    >>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
    >>>
    >>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
    >>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
    >>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
    >>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
    >>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
    >>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
    >>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
    >>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
    >>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
    >>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
    >>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
    >>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> III.               Issue
    >>>
    >>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
    >>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
    >>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
    >>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
    >>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
    >>>
    >>> IV.              Analysis
    >>>
    >>> A.                 Standard of Review
    >>>
    >>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
    >>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
    >>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
    >>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
    >>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
    >>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
    >>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
    >>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
    >>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
    >>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
    >>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
    >>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
    >>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
    >>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
    >>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
    >>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
    >>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
    >>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
    >>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
    >>>
    >>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
    >>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
    >>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
    >>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
    >>> interfere.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
    >>> Prothonotary’s Order?
    >>>
    >>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
    >>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
    >>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
    >>>
    >>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
    >>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
    >>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
    >>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
    >>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
    >>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
    >>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
    >>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
    >>> (…)
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
    >>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
    >>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
    >>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
    >>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
    >>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
    >>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
    >>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
    >>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
    >>> [footnotes omitted].
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
    >>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
    >>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
    >>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
    >>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
    >>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
    >>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
    >>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
    >>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
    >>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
    >>> para. 27).
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
    >>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
    >>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
    >>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
    >>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
    >>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
    >>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
    >>>
    >>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
    >>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
    >>>
    >>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
    >>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
    >>>
    >>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
    >>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
    >>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
    >>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
    >>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
    >>>
    >>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
    >>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
    >>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
    >>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
    >>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
    >>>
    >>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
    >>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
    >>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
    >>>
    >>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
    >>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
    >>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
    >>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
    >>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
    >>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
    >>> of process…
    >>>
    >>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
    >>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
    >>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
    >>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
    >>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
    >>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
    >>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
    >>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
    >>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
    >>>
    >>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
    >>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
    >>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
    >>>
    >>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
    >>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
    >>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
    >>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
    >>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
    >>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
    >>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
    >>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
    >>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
    >>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
    >>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
    >>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
    >>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
    >>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
    >>> supporting a cause of action.
    >>>
    >>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
    >>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
    >>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
    >>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
    >>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
    >>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
    >>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
    >>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
    >>>
    >>> V.                 Conclusion
    >>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
    >>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
    >>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
    >>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
    >>> without leave to amend.
    >>> "Wyman W. Webb"
    >>> J.A.
    >>> "David G. Near"
    >>> J.A.
    >>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
    >>> J.A.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
    >>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
    >>>
    >>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
    >>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
    >>> DOCKET:
    >>>
    >>> A-48-16
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
    >>>
    >>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> PLACE OF HEARING:
    >>>
    >>> Fredericton,
    >>> New Brunswick
    >>>
    >>> DATE OF HEARING:
    >>>
    >>> May 24, 2017
    >>>
    >>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
    >>>
    >>> WEBB J.A.
    >>> NEAR J.A.
    >>> GLEASON J.A.
    >>>
    >>> DATED:
    >>>
    >>> October 30, 2017
    >>>
    >>> APPEARANCES:
    >>> David Raymond Amos
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
    >>> (on his own behalf)
    >>>
    >>> Jan Jensen
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
    >>>
    >>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
    >>> Nathalie G. Drouin
    >>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
    >>>
    >>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
    >>>
    >>
    >
    > https://www.banking.senate.gov/download/nazareth-july-26-2005
    >
    > Annette Nazareth
    > From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    > Jump to navigation
    > Jump to search
    > Annette Nazareth
    > Annette Nazareth.jpg
    > Personal details
    > Born  January 27, 1956 (age 64)
    > Providence, Rhode Island, U.S.
    > Political party       Democratic
    > Spouse(s)     Roger W. Ferguson Jr.
    > Education     Brown University (BA)
    > Columbia University (JD)
    >
    > Annette LaPorte Nazareth (born January 27, 1956) is an American
    > attorney who served as a Commissioner of the U.S. Securities and
    > Exchange Commission from August 4, 2005 to January 31, 2008. She is
    > currently a partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell, where she works on
    > regulatory matters and transactions in the firm's Washington, D.C.
    > office.[1]
    > Contents
    >
    >     1 Education and personal life
    >     2 Early career
    >     3 Securities and Exchange Commission
    >         3.1 SEC Commissioner
    >         3.2 Consolidated Supervised Entity
    >     4 References
    >
    > Education and personal life
    >
    > Born on January 27, 1956, in Providence, Rhode Island. In 1978,
    > Nazareth graduated from Brown University with an A.B., magna cum laude
    > and Phi Beta Kappa. She went on to receive a Juris Doctor from
    > Columbia Law School, where she was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar.
    >
    > She is married to Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., former vice chairman of the
    > Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve and current President and
    > CEO of TIAA-CREF. They have two children.
    >
    >
    > https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/annette-nazareth
    >
    > https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/annette-nazareth
    >
    > Annette L. Nazareth
    >
    >     Partner
    >     Washington DC
    >     New York
    >
    > annette.nazareth@davispolk.com
    > +1 202 962 7075
    > +1 212 450 4804
    >
    > Ms. Nazareth is head of Davis Polk's Washington DC office and leads
    > the trading and markets practice within the firm’s Financial
    > Institutions Group. She advises clients across a broad range of
    > complex regulatory matters and transactions. She also works closely
    > with Davis Polk’s SEC enforcement practice, counseling nonfinancial
    > sector corporations that are subject to government regulatory and
    > enforcement actions.
    >
    > Ms. Nazareth has been a key player in financial services regulatory
    > reform for much of her career. She currently advises domestic and
    > international clients on financial regulatory and legislative issues.
    > Ms. Nazareth was a highly regarded financial services policymaker for
    > more than a decade. She joined the SEC Staff in 1998 as a Senior
    > Counsel to Chairman Arthur Levitt and then served as Interim Director
    > of the Division of Investment Management. She served as Director of
    > the Division of Market Regulation (now the Division of Trading and
    > Markets) from 1999 to 2005. As Director, she oversaw the regulation of
    > broker-dealers, exchanges, clearing agencies, transfer agents and
    > securities information processors. In 2005, she was appointed an SEC
    > Commissioner. During her tenure at the Commission, she worked on
    > numerous groundbreaking initiatives, including execution quality
    > disclosure rules, implementation of equities decimal pricing, short
    > sale reforms and modernization of the national market system rules.
    > Ms. Nazareth also served as the Commission’s representative on the
    > Financial Stability Forum from 1999 to 2008.
    >
    > Since leaving the SEC in January 2008, she has served as Rapporteur
    > for the Group of Thirty’s report, The Structure of Financial
    > Supervision: Approaches and Challenges in a Global Marketplace and as
    > Project Director for their report, Enhancing Financial Stability and
    > Resilience: Macroprudential Policy, Tools and Systems for the Future.
    > Earlier in her career, she held a number of senior legal positions at
    > several investment banks.
    >
    > https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/2003/11/18/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
    >
    > Full Committee Hearing
    > Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
    > Mutual Fund Industry
    >
    > Date:   Tuesday, November 18, 2003 Time:   10:00 AM
    >
    > The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the first in a
    > series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
    > Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
    >
    > Witness Panel 1
    >
    >     Mr. William H. Donaldson
    >     Chairman
    >     Securities and Exchange Commission
    >
    >
    > Witness Panel 2
    >
    >     Mr. Matthew P. Fink
    >     President
    >     Investment Company Institute
    >
    >     Mr. Marc Lackritz
    >     President
    >     Securities Industry Association
    >
    >
    > https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
    >
    > Full Committee Hearing
    > Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
    > Mutual Fund Industry
    >
    > Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time:   02:00 PM
    >
    > Witness Panel 1
    >
    >     Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
    >     Director - Division of Enforcement
    >     Securities and Exchange Commission
    >
    >     Mr. Robert Glauber
    >     Chairman and CEO
    >     National Association of Securities Dealers
    >
    >     Eliot Spitzer
    >     Attorney General
    >     State of New York
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Linda Chatman Thomsen Named Director of the Division of Enforcement
    > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    > 2005-73
    >
    > Washington, D.C., May 12, 2005 — Securities and Exchange Commission
    > Chairman William H. Donaldson today named Linda Chatman Thomsen as the
    > Director of the Division of Enforcement. Thomsen has been at the
    > Commission since 1995 and has served as the Division’s Deputy Director
    > since 2002. Thomsen succeeds Stephen M. Cutler, who in April announced
    > that he would leave the Commission.
    >
    > “I am pleased that Linda has agreed to take on this new role at the
    > Commission,” said Chairman Donaldson. “Linda is a highly accomplished
    > attorney with a proven record of effective advocacy on behalf of the
    > nation’s investors. The skills Linda has exhibited during her tenure
    > at the Commission instill great confidence in her ability to lead this
    > important division.”
    >
    >
    > Enforcement Director Linda Chatman Thomsen to Leave SEC
    > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    > 2009-22
    >
    > Washington, D.C., Feb. 9, 2009 — The Securities and Exchange
    > Commission announced today that Linda Chatman Thomsen, Director of the
    > Division of Enforcement, plans to return to the private sector. Ms.
    > Thomsen led a historic period of SEC law enforcement during which the
    > Commission brought more than 2,000 enforcement actions and returned
    > billions of dollars to harmed investors. In the past two years, the
    > Commission has brought the second and third-highest number of
    > enforcement actions in agency history.
    >
    > Among the many precedent-setting enforcement actions led by Ms. Thomsen
    > were:
    >
    >     The Enron investigation and the resulting actions against a number
    > of large financial institutions including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase,
    > and Merrill Lynch.
    >
    >
    > https://www.davispolk.com/professionals/linda-thomsen
    >
    > Linda Chatman Thomsen
    >
    >     Counsel
    >
    >     Washington DC
    >
    > linda.thomsen@davispolk.com
    > +1 202 962 7125
    >
    > Ms. Thomsen, who was the first woman to serve as the Director of the
    > Division of Enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission, is
    > counsel in Davis Polk’s Litigation Department and practices in the
    > Washington DC office. Her practice concentrates in matters related to
    > the enforcement of the federal securities laws.
    >
    > She has represented clients in SEC enforcement investigations and
    > inquiries, in enforcement matters before other agencies, including the
    > Department of Justice (various U.S. Attorneys Offices) and the
    > Commodity Futures Trading Commission, in investigations and inquiries
    > from self-regulatory agencies, including FINRA, and in internal
    > investigations.
    >
    > These matters, which are typically nonpublic, have covered a broad
    > range of securities-related subject matters, including insider
    > trading, foreign corrupt practices, financial reporting, manipulation
    > and regulatory compliance. Her clients have included major financial
    > institutions, regulated entities, public companies and senior
    > executives.
    >
    > Ms. Thomsen returned to Davis Polk in 2009 after 14 years of public
    > service at the SEC. While there she held a variety of positions and
    > ultimately served as the Director of Enforcement from 2005 through
    > February 2009. During her tenure as the Director of Enforcement, she
    > led the Enron investigation, the auction rate securities settlements,
    > the stock options backdating cases and the expansion of the
    > enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
    >
    >
    > roger.ferguson@tiaa.org, mackintoshs@group30.org,
    > cpeterson@tiaa-cref.org, rferguson@tiaa-cref.org,
    > theharlemtimes@gmail.com, pjackson@theharlemtimes.com,
    > Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca
    >
    >
    > https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/blog/2019/12/77358/
    >
    >
    > Amid worsening climate crisis, UN Secretary-General sets out top ten
    > climate action priorities for 2020, vows to stay on frontlines
    >
    > Report on 2019 Climate Action Summit cites need for major emitters to
    > step up, urgency of no new coal, and jobs and a just transition, among
    > other key priorities
    >
    > Madrid, 1 December—With the latest data showing global warming-causing
    > emissions still on the rise, UN Secretary-General António Guterres
    > today set out ten priority areas where much more action is needed to
    > keep a 1.5C future within reach.
    >
    > In his report on the 2019 Climate Action Summit and the road ahead,
    > the Secretary-General said he would work to ensure climate change
    > remains on the forefront of the international agenda, including
    > through:
    >
    >     Convening high-level platforms for countries to present
    > strengthened national climate plans
    >     Pushing financial actors to speed up the shift from the grey to
    > the green economy
    >     Facilitating dialogue between countries and stakeholders
    >     Coordinated engagement of the UN System, among other key steps
    >
    > September’s Climate Action Summit delivered important new actions, a
    > surge in climate momentum, and a clear destination: 45% emissions cuts
    > by 2030, on the way to a carbon neutral world by 2050. The gathering,
    > which drew leaders from across government, business and civil society,
    > also highlighted where much more action is needed.
    >
    > The Climate Action Summit produced 42 multi-partner initiatives in 12
    > critical areas, and many more commitments and announcement from
    > countries, business and civil society organizations.  According to the
    > report, the Summit provided a clear direction of travel for action
    > while reinforcing the goal of limiting climate change to 1.5°C by 2050
    > as a long-term objective, with countries needing to articulate what
    > they will achieve by 2020 and in the mid-term, by 2030.
    >
    > In addition to youth leaders participating directly in the Summit
    > alongside global leaders, the Secretary-General also convened the
    > first ever Youth Climate Summit, proving a platform at the UN for
    > young people to share their concerns, ideas and solutions for greater
    > climate action.
    >
    > The Summit also demonstrated political leadership with 70 countries
    > committing to deliver more ambitious climate plans, or NDCs, in 2020.
    > While these countries represent a significant portion of the world’s
    > population, they account for less than 10 percent of the world’s GHG
    > emissions. If none of the major emitters formally committed to more
    > ambitious NDCs, some of them “committed to commit” by the end of 2020.
    > Finally, 75 countries committed to deliver 2050 net zero emissions
    > strategies by 2020.
    >
    > Many of the strongest outcomes from the Summit came from the private
    > sector.  Coalitions of leading companies also stepped up, across key
    > sectors such as shipping, food and beverage, urban transport and
    > building, and the Net-Zero Asset Owner Alliance, which comprises 12
    > Asset Owners, allocating more than US$2.4 trillion globally  committed
    > to the full transition of all investment portfolios to net zero by
    > 2050, with strong intermediate targets every 5 years.
    >
    > The Summit highlighted how climate action can have meaningful impacts
    > on people’s lives, including on their jobs and health, and therefore
    > showed the need to align policies and systems to speed up the
    > implementation of both the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable
    > Development Goals (SDGs), leaving no-one behind.
    >
    > Setting priorities for 2020
    >
    > Much more needs to be done.  In his report, the Secretary-General
    > highlights ten priority areas for 2020:
    >
    >     Securing commitments from the main emitters of more ambitious
    > national commitments
    >     All countries coming forward with 2050 carbon neutrality commitments.
    >     Increasing the ambition of national commitments in sectors that
    > were not fully taken in account in the past, such as the use
    > nature-based solutions
    >     Tackling the social dimension of climate change by  ensuring that
    > national commitments include a just transition for people whose jobs
    > and livelihoods are impacted
    >     Curtailing current coal capacity and ensuring no more new coal
    > power plants are built after 2020.
    >     Accelerating the transition to 100% renewable energy
    >     Accelerating the shift of the financial flows, pushing on carbon
    > pricing to tax pollution not people, and ensuring access to
    > sustainable finance
    >     Stepping-up support for people affected by climate change and
    > making the shift towards a resilient future.
    >     Delivering on commitments made at the Summit to Small Islands
    > Developing States and Least Developed Countries.
    >     Implementing the Summit’s initiatives aiming at the deep
    > decarbonization of key economic sectors
    >
    > The report is being released during the UN Climate Conference in
    > Madrid, where the international community is working on key issues
    > relating to implementation of the Paris Agreement, so it can reach its
    > full potential.
    >
    > “It is five minutes to midnight in the global climate emergency.
    > Carbon pollution must stop rising in 2020 and start falling to keep
    > the Paris Agreement goals within realistic reach,” Secretary-General
    > Guterres said.  “We are a very long way behind, but there is still
    > reason to believe we can win this race. The next 12 months will be
    > crucial.”
    >
    > The latest data from United Nations Environment show that emissions
    > must stop rising in 2020 and fall in the order of 7.6 percent every
    > year to 2030 to keep the 1.5°C goal within reach.
    >
    > On the eve of the Summit the Secretary-General announced the
    > appointment of Mr. Mark Carney as his Special Envoy on Climate Action
    > and Finance.  Mr. Carney will have a focus on ambitious implementation
    > of climate action, with special attention to significantly shifting
    > public and private finance markets and mobilizing private finance to
    > the levels needed to achieve the 1.5°C goal of the Paris Agreement.
    >
    > For further information, please contact Dan Shepard, UN Department of
    > Public Information, 1 212 963 9495, M 646 675 3286 email
    > shepard@un.org, or Matthew Coghlan, Climate Action Summit Team,
    > matthew.coghlan@un.org
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > https://www.advisoryexcellence.com/experts/roger-w-ferguson-jr/
    >
    >
    >
    > https://www.tiaa.org/public/about-tiaa/leadership-team/roger-ferguson
    >
    > Roger Ferguson
    > President and Chief Executive Officer
    > B.A., J.D., and Ph.D, Harvard University
    > Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., is President and Chief Executive Officer of
    > TIAA, the leading provider of retirement services in the academic,
    > research, medical, and cultural fields and a Fortune 100 financial
    > services organization.
    > Mr. Ferguson is the former Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of
    > the U.S. Federal Reserve System. He represented the Federal Reserve on
    > several international policy groups and served on key Federal Reserve
    > System committees, including Payment System Oversight, Reserve Bank
    > Operations, and Supervision and Regulation. As the only Governor in
    > Washington, D.C. on 9/11, he led the Fed’s initial response to the
    > terrorist attacks, taking actions that kept the U.S. financial system
    > functioning while reassuring the global financial community that the
    > U.S. economy would not be paralyzed.
    > Prior to joining TIAA in April 2008, Mr. Ferguson was head of
    > financial services for Swiss Re, Chairman of Swiss Re America Holding
    > Corporation, and a member of the company’s executive committee. From
    > 1984 to 1997, he was an Associate and Partner at McKinsey & Company.
    > He began his career as an attorney at the New York City office of
    > Davis Polk & Wardwell.
    > Mr. Ferguson is a member of the Smithsonian Institution’s Board of
    > Regents and serves on the New York State Insurance Advisory Board. He
    > is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences and co-chairs
    > its Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education. He serves on
    > the boards of Alphabet, Inc.; General Mills, Inc.; and International
    > Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.
    > He serves on the boards of The Conference Board, the American Council
    > of Life Insurers, the Institute for Advanced Study and Memorial Sloan
    > Kettering Cancer Center. He is a fellow of the American Philosophical
    > Society and a member of the Economic Club of New York, the Council on
    > Foreign Relations, the Group of Thirty and the National Association
    > for Business Economics.
    > Mr. Ferguson served on President Obama’s Council on Jobs and
    > Competitiveness as well as its predecessor, the Economic Recovery
    > Advisory Board, and he co-chaired the National Academy of Sciences’
    > Committee on the Long-Run Macro-Economic Effects of the Aging U.S.
    > Population.
    > Mr. Ferguson holds a B.A., J.D., and a Ph.D. in economics, all from
    > Harvard University.
    >
    > https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20080403005626/en/TIAA-CREF-Names-Roger-W.-Ferguson-Jr.-President
    >
    >
    > TIAA-CREF Names Roger W. Ferguson, Jr. President and Chief Executive
    > Officer, Succeeding Herbert M. Allison, Jr.
    >
    > TIAA Appoints Ronald L. Thompson Chairman
    >
    > Ferguson former head of financial services at Swiss Re, member of
    > executive committee and chairman of Swiss Re America Holding
    > Corporation; former vice chairman of Federal Reserve Board of
    > Governors
    >
    > Thompson TIAA board member since 1995; former chairman and chief
    > executive officer of Midwest Stamping and Manufacturing Company
    >
    > Company manages more than $435 billion in assets; serves 3.4 million
    > individuals and more than 15,000 institutions
    >
    > April 03, 2008 10:06 AM Eastern Daylight Time
    >
    > NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Trustees of the Teachers Insurance and
    > Annuity Association (TIAA) have named Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.,
    > president and chief executive officer and appointed Ronald L. Thompson
    > chairman of the TIAA board. Mr. Ferguson and Mr. Thompson succeed
    > Herbert M. Allison, Jr., who is retiring. All changes become effective
    > April 14, 2008.
    >
    >     “Roger’s experience and expertise make him a superb choice to lead
    > TIAA-CREF’s work to uphold its mission by focusing on clients’ needs”
    >     Tweet this
    >
    > Mr. Ferguson comes to TIAA-CREF from Swiss Re where he was head of
    > financial services, a member of the executive committee and chairman
    > of Swiss Re America Holding Corporation. He was responsible for Swiss
    > Re's proprietary asset management unit, which managed approximately
    > $200 billion in assets, and oversaw the capital management and
    > advisory group, as well as the credit risk underwriting unit. Prior to
    > Swiss Re, Mr. Ferguson was vice chairman of the Board of Governors of
    > the U.S. Federal Reserve System.
    >
    > Mr. Thompson joined the TIAA Board of Trustees in 1995 and currently
    > serves as its Presiding Trustee. He served as chairman and chief
    > executive officer of Midwest Stamping and Manufacturing Company from
    > 1993 to 2005.
    >
    > TIAA-CREF is the leading retirement system for people who work in the
    > academic, research, medical and cultural fields with more than $435
    > billion in combined assets under management. The company serves 3.4
    > million active and retired employees of more than 15,000 institutions.
    > Beyond the choices available through retirement plans, TIAA-CREF
    > offers the Intelligent Life series of easy-to-understand life
    > insurance products; traditional and Roth IRAs; and flexible,
    > premium-deferred variable annuities and single-premium immediate
    > annuities. TIAA-CREF is number 80 on Fortune’s list of America’s
    > largest corporations (as of April 30, 2007).
    >
    > Speaking on behalf of the TIAA board, Ronald L. Thompson, Presiding
    > Trustee, said, “TIAA-CREF is transforming to meet the current and
    > future needs of its individual and institutional clients. Under Herb
    > Allison’s strong leadership, the company has substantially broadened
    > products and advisory services, continued to achieve outstanding
    > investment performance, and further strengthened its financial
    > position. Herb also instituted an extensive risk management program,
    > which the company is currently benefitting from during this period of
    > great market volatility. I am honored to accept the chairmanship of a
    > company with such rich history and a tradition of excellence. Roger
    > Ferguson, by virtue of his broad experience in strategic management,
    > financial services and economic policy, is the ideal person to build
    > on the company’s progress. Together with the trustees and TIAA-CREF’s
    > employees, Roger will lead the organization and its expanded
    > possibilities for service and growth in fulfillment of the company’s
    > mission.”
    >
    > “Roger’s experience and expertise make him a superb choice to lead
    > TIAA-CREF’s work to uphold its mission by focusing on clients’ needs,”
    > said Herb Allison. “He assumes leadership of our company at a pivotal
    > moment. The organization has made important changes that are producing
    > significant results. These advances will allow the company to
    > accelerate growth opportunities and ultimately provide greater value
    > to clients. I would like to thank TIAA-CREF’s employees, whose
    > creativity, dedication and professionalism have enabled us to progress
    > so rapidly. Their values are what most differentiate TIAA-CREF’s
    > service to clients.”
    >
    > “I am honored to assume leadership of an organization with such an
    > inspiring mission and legacy of performance for clients,” said Mr.
    > Ferguson. “This is a challenging time for individuals, who want
    > assurance that their retirement plans can stay on course through
    > economic uncertainty and for retirement-plan sponsors, who are
    > providing benefits to their employees while fulfilling more exacting
    > obligations in managing their retirement plans. In the years ahead, we
    > will remain focused on clients’ needs by building on TIAA-CREF’s 90
    > years of helping individuals achieve financial security and aiding
    > institutions as they uphold their fiduciary obligations. We also will
    > build upon the advantages of choice, value, objective advice,
    > investment performance, staying power and integrity that together
    > distinguish TIAA-CREF from other financial companies and that have
    > been so effectively nurtured by Herb Allison and his predecessors.”
    >
    > Important changes producing significant results
    >
    > In recent years, TIAA-CREF has taken steps to offer clients a wider
    > range of financial products and services that broaden their investment
    > choices and help them make sound financial decisions. As a result of
    > these steps:
    >
    >     TIAA-CREF is satisfying retirement plan sponsors’ need for
    > expanded funds and accounts, with nearly 1,000 plans having added
    > non-proprietary mutual funds on TIAA-CREF’s platform, in addition to
    > TIAA-CREF annuity accounts and funds.
    >     The company’s proprietary fund/account offering has expanded from
    > 19 in 2003 to 73 today, in addition to institutional separate
    > accounts, and to 297 third-party funds from 72 fund families.
    >     98 percent of TIAA-CREF institutional clients who have moved their
    > plans to the company’s new open investment platform have taken
    > advantage of TIAA-CREF’s expanded offerings.
    >     The company is positioned to help plan sponsors meet expanded
    > reporting requirements that take effect in 2009 as a result of new
    > regulations governing the operation of 403(b) plans.
    >     TIAA-CREF has created several new annuity products, such as a
    > stable value annuity and an annuity with features that provide
    > institutional clients greater control over their fund offering. In
    > addition, the company has developed best-in-class lifecycle funds that
    > are continually enhanced.
    >     TIAA-CREF also offers planned giving services for colleges,
    > universities and other non-profits via Kaspick & Company, the nation’s
    > leading provider of such services, which TIAA-CREF acquired in October
    > 2006.
    >     TIAA-CREF also is more accessible to clients, who can speak with a
    > TIAA-CREF consultant in one of 60 local offices or via telephone.
    >
    > TIAA-CREF has developed one of the leading retirement plan advisory
    > services.
    >
    >     More than 80 percent of individual clients who have used
    > TIAA-CREF’s Wealth Management service, launched in 2004, rate the
    > service “better or much better” than comparable services offered by
    > competitors.1
    >     For individual investors, TIAA-CREF now features personalized,
    > holistic investment advice, which Forbes magazine called “the most
    > extensive personalized workplace advice,” which TIAA-CREF delivers via
    > consultants who receive no sales commissions as part of their total
    > compensation.2
    >
    > The company continues to strengthen its commitment to consistent,
    > long-term investment growth.
    >
    >     More than 70 percent of TIAA-CREF’s funds and annuity accounts
    > have exceeded their Morningstar median for the past three and five
    > years (as of December 31, 2007).3
    >     The company has maintained effective risk management that has
    > helped TIAA-CREF to largely avoid losses in the debt markets that
    > other financial firms have experienced.
    >
    > Since 2002, TIAA-CREF has added to its financial strength.
    >
    >     This has allowed the company to remain one of only three U.S.
    > insurance companies to receive the highest rating from all major
    > insurance rating agencies.4
    >     Overall, assets under management grew from $264 billion in 2002 to
    > more than $435 billion (as of December 31, 2007), while legacy costs
    > companywide were reduced more than $300 million (through 2006).
    >
    > In addition, since 2002, TIAA-CREF has won more institutional mandates
    > than ever before, in direct competition with other firms.
    >
    > Biographical information about Roger W. Ferguson, Jr.
    >
    > Mr. Ferguson, 57, was appointed chairman of Swiss Re America Holding
    > Corporation in June 2006. In October 2006 he was appointed head of
    > financial services at Swiss Re and became a member of the company’s
    > executive committee.
    >
    > Before joining Swiss Re, Mr. Ferguson served as vice chairman of the
    > Board of Governors of the U.S. Federal Reserve System. He joined the
    > Federal Reserve in 1997, and became Vice Chairman in 1999. He was a
    > voting member of the Federal Open Market Committee, served as chairman
    > of the Financial Stability Forum, and chaired Federal Reserve Board
    > committees on banking supervision and regulation, payment system
    > policy and reserve bank oversight. In 2001, Mr. Ferguson led the
    > Federal Reserve’s immediate response to the terrorist attack on
    > September 11.
    >
    > Prior to joining the Federal Reserve Board, Mr. Ferguson was an
    > Associate and Partner at McKinsey & Company from 1984 to 1997. From
    > 1981 to 1984, he was an attorney at the New York City office of Davis
    > Polk & Wardwell, where he worked on syndicated loans, public
    > offerings, mergers and acquisitions, and new product development.
    >
    > Mr. Ferguson received a Ph.D. in economics in 1981, a J.D. in 1979 and
    > a B.A. in economics in 1973, all from Harvard University.
    >
    > He is a member of the Board of Overseers of Harvard University and of
    > the Board of Trustees of the Institute for Advanced Study. He is also
    > a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Group of Thirty.
    >
    >
    > About TIAA-CREF
    >
    > TIAA-CREF is a national financial services organization with more than
    > $435 billion in combined assets under management (as of December 31,
    > 2007) and is the leading provider of retirement services in the
    > academic, research, medical and cultural fields. Further information
    > can be found at www.tiaa-cref.org.
    >
    > 1 TIAA-CREF internal customer survey data, 2007.
    >
    > 2 “Got to Have a Plan,” Forbes, December 10, 2007. TIAA-CREF
    > consultants are compensated through a salary plus incentive program
    > that emphasizes client service excellence.
    >
    > 3 The Morningstar median represents the midpoint of an index of
    > comparable funds/accounts (grouped according to factors such as
    > objective and asset class). Relative performance over other periods
    > may vary. For more complete information about TIAA-CREF performance
    > and rankings, visit our website at www.tiaa-cref.org/performance.
    >
    > 4 A++, A.M. Best Company (as of 6/07); AAA, Fitch Ratings (as of
    > 5/07); Aaa, Moody’s Investors Service (as of 5/07); AAA, Standard &
    > Poor’s (as of 7/07) – the highest possible ratings from these
    > independent analysts. These ratings do not apply to variable
    > annuities, mutual funds, or any other product or service not fully
    > backed by TIAA’s/TIAA-CREF Life’s claims-paying ability.
    >
    > All TIAA-CREF investment products are subject to market risk and other
    > risk factors, including the possible loss of principal. Past
    > performance is no guarantee of future results.
    >
    > You should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and
    > expenses carefully before investing. Please call 877-518-9161, or go
    > to www.tiaa-cref.org for a current prospectus that contains this and
    > other information. Please read the prospectus carefully before
    > investing.
    >
    > TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC and Teachers
    > Personal Investors Services, Inc., members FINRA, distribute
    > securities products. Advisory services are provided by Advice and
    > Planning Services, a division of TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional
    > Services, LLC, a registered investment advisor. Insurance and annuity
    > products issued by TIAA (Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association),
    > New York, NY and TIAA-CREF Life Insurance Co., New York, NY.
    >
    > Contacts
    >
    > TIAA-CREF
    > Chad Peterson, 212-916-4808
    > cpeterson@tiaa-cref.org
    >
    >
    > Group of Thirty
    > 1701 K Street, NW, Suite 950,
    > Washington, DC 20006, USA
    > PHONE: 202-331-2472
    >
    >
    > Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., Trustee
    >
    > Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., is President and Chief Executive Officer of
    > TIAA, the leading provider of retirement services in the academic,
    > research, medical, and cultural fields and a Fortune 100 financial
    > services organization.
    >
    > Mr. Ferguson is the former Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of
    > the U.S. Federal Reserve System. He represented the Federal Reserve on
    > several international policy groups and served on key Federal Reserve
    > System committees, including Payment System Oversight, Reserve Bank
    > Operations, and Supervision and Regulation. As the only Governor in
    > Washington, D.C. on 9/11, he led the Fed’s initial response to the
    > terrorist attacks, taking actions that kept the U.S. financial system
    > functioning while reassuring the global financial community that the
    > U.S. economy would not be paralyzed.
    >
    > Prior to joining TIAA in April 2008, Mr. Ferguson was head of
    > financial services for Swiss Re, Chairman of Swiss Re America Holding
    > Corporation, and a member of the company’s executive committee. From
    > 1984 to 1997, he was an Associate and Partner at McKinsey & Company.
    > He began his career as an attorney at the New York City office of
    > Davis Polk & Wardwell.
    >
    > Mr. Ferguson is a member of the Smithsonian Institution’s Board of
    > Regents and serves on the New York State Insurance Advisory Board. He
    > is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences and co-chairs
    > its Commission on the Future of Undergraduate Education. He serves on
    > the boards of Alphabet, Inc.; General Mills, Inc.; and International
    > Flavors & Fragrances, Inc.
    >
    > He is Chairman of The Conference Board and serves on the boards of the
    > Institute for Advanced Study and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer
    > Center. He is a fellow of the American Philosophical Society and a
    > member of the Economic Club of New York, the Council on Foreign
    > Relations, and the Group of Thirty.
    >
    > Mr. Ferguson served on President Obama’s Council on Jobs and
    > Competitiveness as well as its predecessor, the Economic Recovery
    > Advisory Board, and he co-chaired the National Academy of Sciences’
    > Committee on the Long-Run Macro-Economic Effects of the Aging U.S.
    > Population.
    >
    > Mr. Ferguson holds a B.A., J.D., and a Ph.D. in economics, all from
    > Harvard University.
    >
    >
    > https://www.world-economics-journal.com/Authors/Stuart%20P.M.%20Mackintosh.author?AID=1062
    >
    > Stuart P.M. Mackintosh
    >
    > Email: mackintoshs@group30.org
    >
    > Stuart P.M. MackintoshStuart P.M. Mackintosh is the executive director
    > of the Group of Thirty, an international financial and economic think
    > tank composed of the world’s leading central bankers and financial
    > sector leaders. He oversees all aspects of the Group of Thirty’s
    > annual work programme of studies, project development, event planning
    > and annual fundraising. He has a BA and a PhD from Newcastle
    > University and an MSc from the University of Edinburgh.
    >
    >
    > https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20080403005626/en/TIAA-CREF-Names-Roger-W.-Ferguson-Jr.-President
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > http://theharlemtimes.com/contact
    >
    > Get in touch with The Harlem Times! We’d love to hear from you. Call us at
    > (347) 357-3567
    >
    theharlemtimes@gmail.com
    pjackson@theharlemtimes.com
    >
    >
    > pmason@rideauinstitute.ca
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Stifel Financial Advisor
    > Robert Laney, JD
    >
    > Phone: (805) 604-6711
    > LANEYR@stifel.com
    >
    > https://sec.report/AdviserInfo/Individuals/3190175
    >
    >
    > ROBERT BAYLISS LANEY
    > CRD#: 3190175
    >   Investment Adviser
    >   Broker
    > STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED CRD#: 793
    > 1000 TOWN CENTER DR., OXNARD, CA, United States, 93030
    > Other Business Discloures
    >
    > 1. NUCLEAR AGE PEACE FOUNDATION; 1187 COAST VILLAGE ROAD #1 SANTA
    > BARBARA CA 93108; EDUCATION AND ADVOCACY; CHAIR OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS;
    > CONVENE AND CONDUT MEETINGS OF THE BOARD; AFFILIATION STARTED
    > 01/01/1995; 5 HOURS PER MONTH; DURING SECURITIES TRADING HOURS; NOT
    > INVESTMENT-RELATED.
    >
    >
    >

     

     

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2020 18:02:11 -0300
    Subject: Methinks the Radio X dudes should explain to Jonathan
    Montpetit that conspiracies do exist because everybody knows CBC plays
    their part in many of them Nesy Pas?
    To: jonathan.montpetit@cbc.ca, live@radiox.com, "erin.otoole"
    <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
    pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>,
    info@electbawa.ca, info@nota.ca, mdsmith@postmedia.com,
    rhinoshornyyz@gmail.com, hello@anchor.fm, news@citynews.ca,
    fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca, jivison@postmedia.com,
    "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "PETER.MACKAY"
    <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "sylvie.gadoury"
    <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "steve.murphy"
    <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, Nathalie Sturgeon
    <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>

    EMAIL: live@radiox.com
    TÉL: 418-670-9098
    TEXTO: 418-670-9098


    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/10/us-conspiracy-theories-and-far-right.html

    Tuesday, 6 October 2020
    U.S. conspiracy theories and far-right movement have merged with
    anti-mask sentiment in Quebec: journalist

     https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies



    David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
    Replying to@DavidRayAmos @Bbawa and 9 others
    @MaximeBernier @TheMenzoid @erinotoole and the dudes within Radio X
    (CHOI-FM) should at the very least tune into 4 minutes and 30 seconds
    in order to listen to what I said about their old buddy André Arthur
    on a Rogers Talk Show on April Fools Day 2006

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ca6Egqghmw

    Tom Young
    Dec 12, 2012

    David Amos


    https://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006



     ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Johanne Mennie <johanne@peoplespartyofcanada.ca>
    Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 08:51:03 -0700
    Subject: Automatic Response Re: Fwd: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know
    what CBC and everybody else knows
    To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

    Hello,

    Johanne Mennie is no longer an employee of the People's Party of
    Canada and as a result this email address is no longer active.

    Your message has been forwarded to the current Executive Director, Daniel Tyrie.

    Thank you for reaching out to the PPC.

    Regards,

    PPC Team
    ______________________________

    __
    Bonjour,

    Johanne Mennie n'est plus une employée du Parti populaire du Canada
    et, par conséquent, cette adresse courriel n'est plus active.

    Votre message a été transmis au directeur Directeur général, Daniel Tyrie.

    Merci d'avoir contacté le PPC.

    Cordialement,

    L'équipe PPC

    Johanne Mennie

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Smith, Marie-Danielle"<mdsmith@postmedia.com>
    Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 17:02:35 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole I wonder how long your
    fellow lawyer Maxime Bernier willl continuue to play as dumb as Bill
    Morneau
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I am no longer with Postmedia. Any correspondence regarding Postmedia
    politics can be forwarded to Ottawa bureau chief John Ivison at
    jivison@postmedia.com



    André Arthur
    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Member of the Canadian Parliament
    for Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier
    In office
    2006–2011
    Preceded by    Guy Côté
    Succeeded by    Élaine Michaud
    Personal details
    Born    December 21, 1943 (age 76)
    Quebec City, Quebec
    Political party    Independent
    Spouse(s)    divorced
    Residence    Quebec City, Quebec
    Profession    Journalist, radio host

    André Arthur (born December 21, 1943) is a Canadian radio host and
    politician. He was the independent Member of Parliament for the riding
    of Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier from 2006 to 2011. He is known for his
    outspoken style and anti-statist right-of-center politics in a
    province known for mainly supporting left-of-center policies, but has
    nonetheless earned widespread popularity, earning the nickname le Roi
    Arthur ("King Arthur").

    Arthur consistently voted to support the government on confidence
    matters. As a result, the Conservative Party decided not to run a
    candidate against him in the 2008 and 2011 federal elections. This
    decision proved to be decisive in his 2008 re-election; Arthur
    retained the seat with only 33.5% of the vote, against 32% for Richard
    Coté of the Bloc Québécois.

    In 2011, Globe and Mail noted in an interview that aired on CHOI-FM in
    Quebec City on Aug. 23, 2007, shortly after a Tory cabinet shuffle,
    tdirected some of his well-known on-air venom toward Stephen Harper's
    new team. He called Peter MacKay, dismissing him as "a loser" and "a
    ridiculous character". Stated that Jim Prentice was "not a bad"
    minister who spent all his time solving problems for the Prime
    Minister and Bev Oda "lamentable - unable to find her behind with her
    two hands". However, Quebec MP Maxime Bernier, defended his party
    choice not stating to field a candidate during the 2011 election by
    stating "Absolutely not. He is an independent and he has his freedom
    of speech," and "Who doesn't make mistakes in life?"[ Arthur was
    defeated in 2011 by the New Democratic Party candidate, Élaine
    Michaud.




    David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
    Replying to @Bbawa and @DanielTyrie
    YO@BillBlair Methinks you and @JustinTrudeau should study your email
    ASAP N'esy Pas?

     #cdnpoli

    Please do enjoy a little Deja Vu


     https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/01/peter-mackay-set-to-enter-conservative.html



    Too Too Funny EH?

    @jonmontpetit @Jefffillion @francoislegault @realDonaldTrump @FBIWFO @RCMPNB



     https://www.cbc.ca/radio/day6/quebec-s-anti-mask-protests-trump-s-emergency-powers-dick-johnson-is-dead-levar-burton-reads-and-more-1.5746476/u-s-conspiracy-theories-and-far-right-movement-have-merged-with-anti-mask-sentiment-in-quebec-journalist-1.5746488


    U.S. conspiracy theories and far-right movement have merged with
    anti-mask sentiment in Quebec: journalist
    CBC reporter Jonathan Montpetit has been tracking far-right activity
    in Quebec for years

    CBC Radio · Posted: Oct 02, 2020 7:17 PM ET


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 19:10:36 -0300
    Subject: Attn Col. Lawrence Wilkerson Perhaps you should check my work
    and that of CBC to see who ethical and who is not
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Cc: lbwilk@wm.edu, annette.nazareth@davispolk.com,
    linda.thomsen@davispolk.com, cpeterson@tiaa-cref.org,
    mackintoshs@group30.org, theharlemtimes@gmail.com,
    pjackson@theharlemtimes.com, LANEYR@stifel.com,
    pmason@rideauinstitute.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    premier <premier@ontario.ca>, djtjr <djtjr@trumporg.com>,
    press@trump.org, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
    <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Nathalie Sturgeon
    <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, "steve.murphy"
    <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
    "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"
    <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/10/massive-military-spending-is-turning.html


    Thursday, 1 October 2020
    Massive military spending is turning America into a 'warfare state,'
    warns ex U.S. Army Colonel


    https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies


    David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
    Replying to @DavidRayAmos  @alllibertynews and 49 others
    Methinks Trump et el know why Col. Lawrence Wilkerson never returned
    my phone call or answered my emails or even my Tweet N'esy Pas?

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/10/massive-military-spending-is-turning.html

    #cdnpoli #nbpoli

    https://www.cbc.ca/radio/ideas/massive-military-spending-is-turning-america-into-a-warfare-state-warns-ex-u-s-army-colonel-1.5738677

    Massive military spending is turning America into a 'warfare state,'
    warns ex U.S. Army Colonel
    'We are the merchants of death for seven billion people,' says Col.
    Lawrence Wilkerson

    CBC Radio · Posted: Sep 28, 2020 5:28 PM ET


    666 Comments


    David Amos
    Content disabled
    Trust that I will do my best to try to talk to Col. Lawrence Wilkerson
    personally




    André Carrel
    What Col. Wilkerson said about the two political parties in the US
    applies, albeit to a lesser degree, to our own political parties as
    well.
    We are at a point where party leaders define what the party stands
    for, and, once in power, it is the party leader, with the PMO being
    the principle vehicle, who controls parliament.
    Not as bad (yet) as the US, but travelling on the same track in terms
    of the concentration of power in the establishment of our major
    political parties, all of them.

    David Amos
    Reply to @André Carrel: Oh So True However beware of Pied Pipers Col.
    Wilkerson is not telling us anything our Veteran Fathers (RIP) didn't
    already know since Ike was the Yankee President

    David Amos
    Reply to @David Amos: Remember what Diefenbaker did with the Avro
    Arrow and where a lot of our best engineers etc went?

    Methinks he liked Ike too N'esy Pas?








    David Amos
    Methinks Trump et el know why Col. Lawrence Wilkerson never returned
    my phone call or answered my emails or even my Tweet N'esy Pas?

    John Valente
    Reply to @David Amos: Elvis had a Col. Parker has a manager. Chickens
    have a Col. Sanders...

    David Amos
    Reply to @John Valente: My favourite is CoL Proudy
    Leroy Fletcher Prouty (January 24, 1917 – June 5, 2001)[1] served as
    Chief of Special Operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff under
    President John F. Kennedy. A former colonel in the United States Air
    Force, he retired from military service to become a bank executive. He
    subsequently became a critic of U.S. foreign policy, particularly the
    covert activities of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) about which
    he had considerable inside knowledge. Prouty was the inspiration for
    the character "Mr. X" in Oliver Stone's film JFK.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 14:04:36 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: YO Erin O'Toole I wonder how long your fellow lawyer
    Maxime Bernier willl continuue to play as dumb as Bill Morneau
    To: jivison@postmedia.com, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
    "PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Smith, Marie-Danielle"<mdsmith@postmedia.com>
    Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 17:02:35 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: YO Erin O'Toole I wonder how long your
    fellow lawyer Maxime Bernier willl continuue to play as dumb as Bill
    Morneau
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I am no longer with Postmedia. Any correspondence regarding Postmedia
    politics can be forwarded to Ottawa bureau chief John Ivison at
    jivison@postmedia.com

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 14:02:24 -0300
    Subject: YO Erin O'Toole I wonder how long your fellow lawyer Maxime
    Bernier willl continuue to play as dumb as Bill Morneau
    To: info@electbawa.ca, info@nota.ca, mdsmith@postmedia.com,
    rhinoshornyyz@gmail.com, hello@anchor.fm, news@citynews.ca,
    "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
    <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, riding@tcndp.ca,
    info@brianchang.ca, hello@ryanlester.ca, votemarci@liberal.ca
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, "erin.otoole"
    <erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"<jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>,
    pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>

    Canadian federal by-election, October 26, 2020: Toronto Centre
    Resignation of Bill Morneau
    Party   Candidate       Votes   %       ±%
            Liberal         Marci Ien*                     
            Conservative    Ryan Lester                     
            Green   Annamie Paul                   
            New Democratic  Brian Chang                     
            Free Party Canada       Dwayne Cappelletti*                     
            People's        Baljit S. Bawa                 
            Rhinoceros      Sean Carson                     
            No Affiliation  Above Znoneofthe*

    Baljit Bawa
    Principled. Proven. Progressive.
    info@electbawa.ca
    416.728.4142

    https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/meet-above-znoneofthe-the-fringe-candidate-who-keeps-running-in-ontario-by-elections

    Meet Above Znoneofthe, the fringe candidate who keeps running in
    Ontario by-elections

    Not only is he willing to legally change his name; he’s willing to
    'pull a Mrs. Doubtfire,' cross-dress and sneak by security to mouth
    off on debate stages
    Author of the article:
    Marie-Danielle Smith
    Publishing date:
    Nov 21, 2016

    Email info@nota.ca
    Facebook NOTA (Ontario) | NOTA (Canada)
    YouTube NOTA (Ontario)
    Phone (905) 501-0010


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Johanne Mennie <johanne@peoplespartyofcanada.ca>
    Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 08:51:03 -0700
    Subject: Automatic Response Re: Fwd: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know
    what CBC and everybody else knows
    To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

    Hello,

    Johanne Mennie is no longer an employee of the People's Party of
    Canada and as a result this email address is no longer active.

    Your message has been forwarded to the current Executive Director, Daniel Tyrie.

    Thank you for reaching out to the PPC.

    Regards,

    PPC Team
    ________________________________
    Bonjour,

    Johanne Mennie n'est plus une employée du Parti populaire du Canada
    et, par conséquent, cette adresse courriel n'est plus active.

    Votre message a été transmis au directeur Directeur général, Daniel Tyrie.

    Merci d'avoir contacté le PPC.

    Cordialement,

    L'équipe PPC


    --

    Johanne Mennie


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 12:50:56 -0300
    Subject: Fwd: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and everybody else knows
    To: votesaks@liberal.ca, andrea4yorkcentre
    <andrea4yorkcentre@gmail.com>, johnturmel <johnturmel@yahoo.com>,
    info@votejulius.ca, johanne@peoplespartyofcanada.ca,
    maxime@peoplespartyofcanada.ca, info <info@peoplespartyofcanada.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, Newsroom@globeandmail.com

    Canadian federal by-election, October 26, 2020: York Centre
    Resignation of Michael Levitt

            Liberal         Ya'ara Saks*                   
            Conservative    Julius Tiangson*                       
            Green                           
            New Democratic  Andrea Vásquez Jiménez                 
            People's        Maxime Bernier                 
            Independent     John The Engineer Turmel*



    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/green-party-new-leader-1.5749648

    Toronto lawyer Annamie Paul elected leader of the federal Green Party


    Paul is the first Black permanent leader of a major federal political party
    John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Oct 03, 2020 5:00 PM ET

    2003 Comments


    Al Arres
    Nutcases + Communists = Green Party

    Ken Theule
    Reply to @Al Arres:
    Open your mind a little

    Jim Ryan
    Reply to @Al Arres: I think perhaps more of the nutcases are posting
    on here. As for the communists ... lets get rid of healthcare,
    schools, roads, police, fires etc ... all universal programs run by
    the government and funded by taxpayers

    David Amos
    Reply to @Ken Theule: Methinks a lot of folks should ASAP N'esy Pas?




    David Amos
    Trust that I contacted the latest Green Party leader as soon as i read
    this article





    Greg Lang
    So yet another leader of a (sigh) federal party without a seat in the
    HoC. This is a usless waste of tax payers money.

    Bob Rodgers
    Reply to @Greg Lang: How? The Green Party Pays her salary, not the
    government of Canada.

    David Amos
    Reply to @Bob Rodgers: True




    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2020 15:54:53 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and
    everybody else knows
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

    If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
    support, please contact our Customer Service department at
    1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

    If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
    publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

    Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

    This is the correct email address for requests for news cov



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2020 22:54:34 -0300
    Subject: Attn Annamie Paul Now you know what CBC and everybody else knows
    To: connect@annamiepaul.ca, john.tasker@cbc.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Newsroom
    <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>



    https://www.annamiepaul.ca/

    connect@annamiepaul.ca

    1-833-ANNAMIE 266 2643

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:29:22 +0000
    Subject: RE: I received no response from the RCMP or the lawyer Derek
    Sloan about the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin
    Martin last week
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    comments.
    Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
    any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
    on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
    Government of Canada website at
    www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
    calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

    Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
    Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
    En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
    que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
    Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
    économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
    le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
    www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
    composant le
    1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:29:05 -0300
    Subject: I received no response from the RCMP or the lawyer Derek
    Sloan about the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin
    Martin last week
    To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
    <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, "steve.murphy"
    <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
    "andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca \"Hannah.Thibedeau\""
    <Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
    <Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
    newsroom@globeandmail.com, "Nathalie.Drouin"
    <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
    Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca, heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca, pm
    <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, info
    <info@lewislaw.ca>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:27:56 +0000
    Subject: RE: the RCMP and the lawyer Derek.Sloan can trust thati saved
    the voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin Martin N'esy Pas
    Petey Baby MacKay?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    comments.
    Due to the evolving COVID-19 situation, we apologize in advance for
    any delay in responding to your enquiry. In the meantime, information
    on Canada's COVID-19 Economic Response Plan is available on the
    Government of Canada website at
    www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> or by
    calling 1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) or 1-833-784-4397.

    Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
    Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
    En raison de la fluidité de la crise de la COVID-19, il est possible
    que nous retardions à vous répondre et nous nous en excusons.
    Entre-temps, les informations au sujet du Plan d'intervention
    économique du Canada pour répondre à la COVID-19 sont disponibles dans
    le site Web du gouvernement du Canada au
    www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus> ou en
    composant le
    1-800 O Canada (1-800-622-6232) ou le 1-833-784-4397.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 14:27:37 -0300
    Subject: the RCMP and the lawyer Derek.Sloan can trust thati saved the
    voicemail I got from his Chief of Staff Benjamin Martin N'esy Pas
    Petey Baby MacKay?
    To: Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, rick@petersoncapital.ca, "PETER.MACKAY"
    <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, "steve.murphy"
    <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
    michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca,
    andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "Hannah.Thibedeau"
    <Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca>, "Catherine.Cullen"
    <Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
    "mc \"Newsroom\""<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
    <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>

    On 1/26/20, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/derek-sloan-conservative-leadership-1.5436227
    >
    > Social conservative MP Derek Sloan running for Conservative
    > leadership, promises 'bold ideas'
    >
    > Sloan is trying to position himself as an alternative to 'boring"
    > candidates'
    > Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 2:08 PM ET
    >
    >
    > https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en/derek-sloan(105178)#roles
    >
    > House of Commons *
    > Ottawa, Ontario,
    > Canada K1A 0A6
    > Telephone: 613-992-5321
    > Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca,
    >
    >
    >
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/rick-peterson-conservative-leadership-1.5436247
    >
    > Businessman Rick Peterson is taking a second run at the Conservative
    > leadership
    >
    > 'I'm probably going to be the only candidate who has to meet a
    > payroll,' Peterson tells CBC News
    > Hannah Thibedeau · CBC News · Posted: Jan 22, 2020 1:15 PM ET
    >
    > https://www.petersoncapital.ca/
    >
    >
    > Rick Peterson - President
    >
    > More than 30 years in Canadian capital markets. Investment Advisor,
    > institutional sales, investment banking experience at senior roles at
    > Midland Walwyn Capital Inc, Merrill Lynch Canada, Yorkton Securities
    > and HSBC Securities.
    >
    > Founded Peterson Capital in 2003; Conservative Party of Canada 2017
    > leadership - candidate
    >
    > 780-868-6822
    > rick@petersoncapital.ca
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
    > <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:40 +0000
    > Subject: RE: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
    > agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
    > knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >
    > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    > comments.
    >
    > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    > commentaires.
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
    > <Premier@ontario.ca>
    > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:32 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
    > of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
    > everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
    > valued.
    >
    > You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    > reviewed and taken into consideration.
    >
    > There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    > need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    > correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    > response may take several business days.
    >
    > Thanks again for your email.
    > ______­­
    >
    > Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    > nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
    >
    > Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    > considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
    >
    > Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    > responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    > la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    > ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
    >
    > Merci encore pour votre courriel.
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
    > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
    > of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
    > everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
    > To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    >
    > Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
    >
    > This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
    > know that every incoming email is read and reviewed.  A member of my
    > Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
    > follow-up is required.
    > Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
    > responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
    > non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
    >
    > In your email, if you:
    >
    > *         have verified that you are a constituent by including your
    > complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
    > will be provided in a timely manner.
    > *         have not included your residential postal mailing address,
    > please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
    > and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
    >
    > If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
    > contact your Member of Parliament.  If you are unsure who your MP is,
    > you can find them by searching your postal code at
    > http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
    >
    > Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
    > attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
    > 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
    > voicemails will be returned promptly.
    >
    > Once again, thank you for your email.
    >
    > The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
    > Wellington-Halton Hills
    > toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
    > Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
    > E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<mailto:michael.chong@parl.gc.ca>
    > Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://www.michaelchong.ca>
    >
    > THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
    > AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
    > CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
    > notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
    > copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
    > strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
    > received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
    > delete this message from your system.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: Erin.OToole@parl.gc.ca
    > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 21:02:54 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
    > of CBC should agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what
    > everybody else knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
    > To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    >
    > ?
    > Hello -
    >
    > Thank you for contacting the office of MP Erin O'Toole.
    >
    > Please accept this automatic response as confirmation that your email
    > has been received. Your message is important to us and we will do our
    > best to respond to you as soon as possible. Our office may be unable
    > to respond to your message immediately, as we receive a large volume
    > of correspondence. If your matter is urgent please contact our office
    > at:
    >
    > Office of MP Erin O'Toole
    > 54 King Street East, Suite 103
    > Bowmanville, ON
    > L1C 1N3
    > Tele. 905-697-1699 or Toll Free: 1-866-436-1141
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:02:27 -0400
    > Subject: Methinks Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel of CBC should
    > agree that Marilyn Gladu has every right to know what everybody else
    > knows N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
    > To: Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, jbradley@canadian-republic.ca,
    > tfreda@canadian-republic.ca, info@canadian-republic.ca,
    > darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca,
    > cra-arc.media@cra-arc.gc.ca, premier@ontario.ca,
    > Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com,
    > news@dailygleaner.com, Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca,
    > Catherine.Cullen@cbc.ca
    > Cc: Marilyn.gladu@parl.gc.ca, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
    > pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca,
    > andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, michael.chong@parl.gc.ca,
    > Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
    Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
    >
    > https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/01/peter-mackay-set-to-enter-conservative.html
    >
    >
    > Wednesday, 15 January 2020
    >
    > Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
    > https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
    >
    > David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
    > Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
    > I never heard of Marilyn Gladu so I called her to explain why MacKay
    > made my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account
    > to verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
    >
    >
    > https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/01/peter-mackay-set-to-enter-conservative.html
    >
    > #nbpoli #cdnpoli
    >
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mackay-tweets-leadership-1.5427544
    >
    > David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
    > Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and 49 others
    > Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made my day Trudeau The
    > Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered this lawsuit while Harper
    > was still the boss N'esy Pas?
    >
    > https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >
    >  #nbpoli #cdnpoli
    >
    > https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mackay-tweets-leadership-1.5427544
    >
    >
    > Peter MacKay set to enter the Conservative leadership race today
    > MacKay's leadership run has been in the rumour mill for months
    >
    > Catherine Cullen · CBC News · Posted: Jan 15, 2020 12:11 PM ET
    >
    > 1213 Comments
    >
    >
    > David Sampson
    > But will intelligent "progressive" conservatives ever forgive Peter
    > for giving away a once proud national political institution to a horde
    > of western based reform fundamentalists?
    >
    > Eugene Peabody
    > Reply to @David Sampson: Not only can former PC members not trust him
    > but Canadians cannot also.When a man.s word is no good ,he is the
    > same.
    >
    > Anne Clarke
    > Reply to @David Sampson: they will do anything to win right?
    >
    > Frank Paul
    > Reply to @David Sampson: Nope.
    >
    > Neil Denman
    > Reply to @David Sampson:
    > I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
    > least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
    > Reformer. Peter Mackay, Jean Charest...I'm no fan of either, but it's
    > a step away from Harper and Scheer.
    >
    > David Raymond Amos
    > Reply to @David Sampson: Methinks everybody knows why MacKay just made
    > my day N'esy Pas?
    >
    > David Allan
    > Reply to @Neil Denman:
    > "I have those feelings too: I have a hard time forgiving that. But, at
    > least there are signs that the next leader may be a PCer rather than a
    > Reformer."
    >
    > He's a reformer now. He solidly demonstrated so with his last 9 years
    > in Parliament.
    > Or is he just an opportunist who doesn't really care aside from his
    > quest for personal power?
    >
    > Sean Cronin
    > Reply to @David Sampson:
    > I will. It's ancient history now.
    >
    > Art Rowe
    > Reply to @David Sampson:
    > Like there was ever a doubt he would run?
    >
    > David Raymond Amos
    > Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Methinks its comical that even Trudeau
    > The Younger cannot deny that Petey Baby answered my lawsuit in Federal
    > Court while Harper was still the boss N'esy Pas?
    >
    > Craig Hall
    > Reply to @David Sampson: Nobody cares except the Liberals. And David
    > Orchard.
    >
    > David Raymond Amos
    > Reply to @Craig Hall: I still do
    >
    > David Linkletter
    > Reply to @Frank Paul: cough robo calls to name but one
    >
    > David Raymond Amos
    > Reply to @Craig Hall: BTW I remember talking to David Orchard in early
    > 2004 about what went down and explained to him why I was preparing to
    > run for a seat in the 38th Parliament Furthermore I put proof of our
    > contact in a email which can still be found on the Internet to this
    > very day
    >
    > David Raymond Amos
    > Reply to @Craig Hall: By the same token I never heard of Marilyn Gladu
    > until I read this article so I called her to explain why MacKay made
    > my day but her assistant was too busy to check my Twitter account to
    > verify what I was saying was true so I told her to enjoy my email
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
    > <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 17:55:17 +0000
    > Subject: RE: YO Tom Freda Say Hey Sylvie Gadoury the General Counsel
    > of CBC for me will ya?
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >
    > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    > comments.
    >
    > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    > commentaires.
    >
    >> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
    >> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
    >> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
    >> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >>
    >> Mr. Amos,
    >> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
    >> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
    >> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
    >> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
    >> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
    >> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
    >> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
    >>
    >> Department of Justice
    >>
    >>
    >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    >>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
    >>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >>> To: coi@gnb.ca
    >>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>
    >>> Good Day Sir
    >>>
    >>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
    >>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
    >>>
    >>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
    >>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
    >>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
    >>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
    >>>
    >>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
    >>> suggested that you study closely.
    >>>
    >>> This is the docket in Federal Court
    >>>
    >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >>>
    >>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
    >>>
    >>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >>>
    >>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >>>
    >>> April 3rd, 2017
    >>>
    >>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
    >>>
    >>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> The only hearing thus far
    >>>
    >>> May 24th, 2017
    >>>
    >>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
    >>>
    >>> Date: 20151223
    >>>
    >>> Docket: T-1557-15
    >>>
    >>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
    >>>
    >>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
    >>>
    >>> BETWEEN:
    >>>
    >>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >>>
    >>> Plaintiff
    >>>
    >>> and
    >>>
    >>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>>
    >>> Defendant
    >>>
    >>> ORDER
    >>>
    >>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
    >>> December 14, 2015)
    >>>
    >>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
    >>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
    >>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
    >>> in its entirety.
    >>>
    >>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
    >>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
    >>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
    >>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
    >>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
    >>> he stated:
    >>>
    >>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
    >>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
    >>> You are your brother’s keeper.
    >>>
    >>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
    >>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
    >>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
    >>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
    >>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
    >>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
    >>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
    >>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
    >>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
    >>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
    >>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
    >>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
    >>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
    >>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
    >>> Police.
    >>>
    >>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
    >>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
    >>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
    >>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
    >>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
    >>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
    >>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
    >>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
    >>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
    >>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
    >>> is no order as to costs.
    >>>
    >>> “B. Richard Bell”
    >>> Judge
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
    >>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
    >>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
    >>>
    >>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
    >>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
    >>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
    >>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
    >>>
    >>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
    >>> most
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> ---------- Original message ----------
    >>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
    >>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
    >>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
    >>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
    >>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
    >>> dudes are way past too late
    >>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >>>
    >>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
    >>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >>>
    >>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
    >>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >>>
    >>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
    >>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >>>
    >>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
    >>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >>>
    >>> Thank you,
    >>>
    >>> Merci ,
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    >>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    >>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    >>> five years after he began his bragging:
    >>>
    >>> January 13, 2015
    >>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >>>
    >>> December 8, 2014
    >>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >>>
    >>> Friday, October 3, 2014
    >>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    >>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
    >>>
    >>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
    >>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
    >>>
    >>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    >>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
    >>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
    >>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
    >>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
    >>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
    >>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
    >>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
    >>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
    >>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
    >>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
    >>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
    >>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
    >>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
    >>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
    >>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
    >>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
    >>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
    >>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
    >>> campaign of 2006.
    >>>
    >>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
    >>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
    >>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
    >>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
    >>>
    >>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
    >>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
    >>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
    >>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
    >>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
    >>>
    >>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
    >>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
    >>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
    >>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
    >>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
    >>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
    >>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
    >>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
    >>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
    >>>
    >>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
    >>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
    >>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
    >>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
    >>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
    >>>
    >>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
    >>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
    >>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
    >>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
    >>>
    >>> Subject:
    >>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
    >>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
    >>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>>
    >>> January 30, 2007
    >>>
    >>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
    >>>
    >>> Mr. David Amos
    >>>
    >>> Dear Mr. Amos:
    >>>
    >>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
    >>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
    >>>
    >>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
    >>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
    >>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
    >>>
    >>> Sincerely,
    >>>
    >>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
    >>> Minister of Health
    >>>
    >>> CM/cb
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
    >>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
    >>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
    >>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
    >>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    >>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
    >>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
    >>>
    >>> Dear Mr. Amos,
    >>>
    >>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
    >>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
    >>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
    >>>
    >>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
    >>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
    >>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
    >>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
    >>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
    >>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
    >>>
    >>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
    >>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
    >>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
    >>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
    >>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
    >>>
    >>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
    >>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
    >>>
    >>>  Sincerely,
    >>>
    >>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
    >>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
    >>> Traffic Services NCO
    >>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
    >>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
    >>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    >>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
    >>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
    >>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
    >>> tel.: 506-457-7890
    >>> fax: 506-444-5224
    >>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
    >>>
    >>
    >>
    >> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
    >>
    >>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
    >>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
    >>>
    >>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
    >>> ilian.html
    >>>
    >>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
    >>>>
    >>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
    >>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
    >>>>
    >>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
    >>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
    >>>> cards?
    >>>>
    >>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
    >>>> 6
    >>>>
    >>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
    >>>>
    >>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
    >>>>
    >>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
    >>>>
    >>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
    >>>> Senator Arlen Specter
    >>>> United States Senate
    >>>> Committee on the Judiciary
    >>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
    >>>> Washington, DC 20510
    >>>>
    >>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
    >>>>
    >>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
    >>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
    >>>> raised in the attached letter.
    >>>>
    >>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
    >>>> tapes.
    >>>>
    >>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
    >>>>
    >>>> Very truly yours,
    >>>> Barry A. Bachrach
    >>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
    >>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
    >>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
    >>>>
    >>>
    >>
    >> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
    >>
    >>
    >> Sunday, 19 November 2017
    >> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
    >> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
    >> The Supreme Court
    >>
    >> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
    >>
    >>
    >> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    >>
    >> Amos v. Canada
    >> Court (s) Database
    >>
    >> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    >> Date
    >>
    >> 2017-10-30
    >> Neutral citation
    >>
    >> 2017 FCA 213
    >> File numbers
    >>
    >> A-48-16
    >> Date: 20171030
    >>
    >> Docket: A-48-16
    >> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    >> CORAM:
    >>
    >> WEBB J.A.
    >> NEAR J.A.
    >> GLEASON J.A.
    >>
    >>
    >> BETWEEN:
    >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >> Respondent on the cross-appeal
    >> (and formally Appellant)
    >> and
    >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >> Appellant on the cross-appeal
    >> (and formerly Respondent)
    >> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
    >> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
    >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
    >>
    >> THE COURT
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Date: 20171030
    >>
    >> Docket: A-48-16
    >> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    >> CORAM:
    >>
    >> WEBB J.A.
    >> NEAR J.A.
    >> GLEASON J.A.
    >>
    >>
    >> BETWEEN:
    >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >> Respondent on the cross-appeal
    >> (and formally Appellant)
    >> and
    >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >> Appellant on the cross-appeal
    >> (and formerly Respondent)
    >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
    >>
    >> I.                    Introduction
    >>
    >> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
    >> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
    >> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
    >> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
    >> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
    >> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
    >> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
    >> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
    >> (Claim at para. 96).
    >>
    >> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
    >> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
    >> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
    >> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
    >> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
    >> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
    >> Prothontary’s Order).
    >>
    >>
    >> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
    >> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
    >> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
    >> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
    >> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
    >> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
    >>
    >>
    >> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
    >> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
    >> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
    >> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
    >> cross-appeal.
    >>
    >>
    >> II.                 Preliminary Matter
    >>
    >> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
    >> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
    >> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
    >> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
    >> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
    >> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
    >> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
    >> several judges but did not name those judges.
    >>
    >> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
    >> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
    >> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
    >> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
    >> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
    >> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
    >> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
    >> c. F-7:
    >>
    >>
    >> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
    >> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
    >> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
    >> Appeal.
    >> […]
    >>
    >> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
    >> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
    >> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
    >> […]
    >> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
    >> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
    >> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
    >>
    >> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
    >> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
    >> juges de la Cour fédérale.
    >>
    >>
    >> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
    >> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
    >> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
    >> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
    >> section.
    >> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
    >> that:
    >> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    >> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
    >> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
    >> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
    >> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
    >> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    >>
    >> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
    >> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
    >> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
    >> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
    >> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
    >> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
    >> matière civile et pénale.
    >> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    >> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
    >> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
    >> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
    >> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
    >> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
    >>
    >> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
    >> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
    >> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
    >> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
    >> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
    >> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
    >> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
    >>
    >>
    >> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
    >> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
    >> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
    >> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
    >> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
    >> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
    >> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
    >> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
    >> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
    >> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
    >> appeal book.
    >>
    >>
    >> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
    >> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
    >> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
    >> conflict in any matter related to him.
    >>
    >>
    >> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
    >> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
    >> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
    >> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
    >> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
    >> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
    >> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
    >> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
    >> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
    >> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
    >> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
    >> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
    >>
    >>
    >> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
    >> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
    >> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
    >> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
    >> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
    >> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
    >> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
    >> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
    >> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
    >> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
    >> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
    >> such judge had a conflict.
    >>
    >>
    >> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
    >> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
    >> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
    >> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
    >> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
    >> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
    >> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
    >> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
    >> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
    >> was a member of such firm.
    >>
    >>
    >> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
    >> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
    >> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
    >> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
    >> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
    >> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
    >> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
    >> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
    >> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
    >>
    >>
    >> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
    >> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
    >> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
    >> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
    >> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
    >> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
    >> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
    >> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
    >> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
    >> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
    >> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
    >> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
    >> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
    >> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
    >> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
    >> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
    >> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
    >> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
    >> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
    >> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
    >> apprehension of bias:
    >> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
    >> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
    >> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
    >> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
    >> reasonable apprehension of bias:
    >> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
    >> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
    >> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
    >> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
    >> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
    >> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
    >> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
    >> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
    >>
    >> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
    >> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
    >> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
    >> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
    >> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
    >> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
    >> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
    >> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
    >> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
    >> (4th) 193).
    >>
    >> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
    >> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
    >> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
    >> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
    >> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
    >> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
    >> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
    >> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
    >> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
    >> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
    >> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
    >> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
    >> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
    >> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
    >> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
    >>
    >>
    >> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
    >> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
    >> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
    >> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
    >> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
    >> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
    >> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
    >> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
    >> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
    >> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
    >>
    >>
    >> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
    >> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
    >> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
    >> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
    >> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
    >> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
    >> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
    >> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
    >> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
    >> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
    >> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
    >> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
    >> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
    >> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
    >> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
    >> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
    >>
    >>
    >> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
    >> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
    >> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
    >> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
    >> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
    >> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
    >> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
    >> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
    >>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
    >> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
    >> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
    >> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
    >> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
    >> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
    >> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
    >> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
    >> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
    >> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
    >> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
    >>
    >>
    >> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
    >> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
    >> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
    >> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
    >> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
    >> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
    >> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
    >> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
    >> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
    >> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
    >> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
    >> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
    >> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
    >> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
    >> events from over a decade ago.
    >> (emphasis added)
    >>
    >> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
    >> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
    >> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
    >> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
    >> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
    >> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
    >> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
    >> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
    >> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
    >> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
    >> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
    >> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
    >> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
    >> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
    >> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
    >> Webb hearing this appeal.
    >>
    >> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
    >> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
    >> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
    >> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
    >> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
    >>
    >> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
    >> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
    >> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
    >> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
    >> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
    >> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
    >> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
    >>
    >> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
    >> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
    >> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
    >> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
    >> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
    >> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
    >> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
    >> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
    >> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
    >> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
    >>
    >> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
    >> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
    >> to recuse himself.
    >>
    >> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
    >> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
    >> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
    >> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
    >> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
    >>
    >> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
    >> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
    >> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
    >> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
    >> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
    >> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
    >> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
    >> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
    >> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
    >> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
    >> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
    >> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
    >>
    >>
    >> III.               Issue
    >>
    >> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
    >> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
    >> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
    >> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
    >> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
    >>
    >> IV.              Analysis
    >>
    >> A.                 Standard of Review
    >>
    >> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
    >> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
    >> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
    >> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
    >> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
    >> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
    >> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
    >> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
    >> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
    >> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
    >> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
    >> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
    >> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
    >> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
    >> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
    >> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
    >> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
    >> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
    >> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
    >>
    >> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
    >> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
    >> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
    >> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
    >> interfere.
    >>
    >>
    >> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
    >> Prothonotary’s Order?
    >>
    >> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
    >> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
    >> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
    >>
    >> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
    >> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
    >> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
    >> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
    >> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
    >> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
    >> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
    >> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
    >> (…)
    >>
    >>
    >> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
    >> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
    >> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
    >> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
    >> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
    >> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
    >> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
    >> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
    >> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
    >> [footnotes omitted].
    >>
    >>
    >> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
    >> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
    >> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
    >> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
    >> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
    >> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
    >> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
    >> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
    >> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
    >> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
    >> para. 27).
    >>
    >>
    >> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
    >> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
    >> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
    >> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
    >>
    >>
    >> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
    >> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
    >> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
    >> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
    >>
    >> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
    >> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
    >>
    >> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
    >> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
    >>
    >> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
    >> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
    >> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
    >> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
    >> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
    >>
    >> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
    >> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
    >> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
    >> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
    >> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
    >>
    >> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
    >> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
    >> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
    >>
    >> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
    >> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
    >> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
    >> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
    >> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
    >> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
    >> of process…
    >>
    >> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
    >> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
    >> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
    >> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
    >> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
    >> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
    >> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
    >> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
    >> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
    >>
    >> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
    >> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
    >> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
    >>
    >> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
    >> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
    >> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
    >> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
    >> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
    >> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
    >> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
    >> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
    >> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
    >> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
    >> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
    >> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
    >> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
    >> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
    >> supporting a cause of action.
    >>
    >> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
    >> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
    >> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
    >> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
    >> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
    >> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
    >> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
    >> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
    >>
    >> V.                 Conclusion
    >> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
    >> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
    >> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
    >> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
    >> without leave to amend.
    >> "Wyman W. Webb"
    >> J.A.
    >> "David G. Near"
    >> J.A.
    >> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
    >> J.A.
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
    >> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
    >>
    >> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
    >> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
    >> DOCKET:
    >>
    >> A-48-16
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> STYLE OF CAUSE:
    >>
    >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> PLACE OF HEARING:
    >>
    >> Fredericton,
    >> New Brunswick
    >>
    >> DATE OF HEARING:
    >>
    >> May 24, 2017
    >>
    >> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
    >>
    >> WEBB J.A.
    >> NEAR J.A.
    >> GLEASON J.A.
    >>
    >> DATED:
    >>
    >> October 30, 2017
    >>
    >> APPEARANCES:
    >> David Raymond Amos
    >>
    >>
    >> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
    >> (on his own behalf)
    >>
    >> Jan Jensen
    >>
    >>
    >> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
    >>
    >> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
    >> Nathalie G. Drouin
    >> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
    >>
    >> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:33:00 -0400
    > Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment I am certain that Rob Moore and the
    > RCMP can explain my concerns with questionable lawyers and their
    > actions CORRECT?
    > To: Pantea Jafari <jafari@jafarilaw.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tugrul Pinar
    > <admin@jafarilaw.ca>, "mgreene@sgimm.ca"<mgreene@sgimm.ca>,
    > "media@blaineimmigration.com"<media@blaineimmigration.com>,
    > "Sophia.Harris"<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"
    > <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
    > "Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
    > <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "mark.vespucci"
    > <mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, "jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca"
    > <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "carl.urquhart"
    > <carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
    > <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
    > <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
    > washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"
    > <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
    > "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: Barbara Massey <Barbara.Massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 12:28:58 -0500
    > Subject: Re: Notice of Harassment (Out of Office )
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >
    > I am out of the office until Wednesday, January 22, 2020, and will not
    > be accessing my Emails.  For any urgencies, you may contact Jolene
    > Harvey, General Counsel @ 613 843 4892., or my admin assistant, Sandra
    > Lofaro 613 843 3540..
    >
    > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    >
    > Je suis absent du bureau jusqu'au 22  janvier 2020, et je n'accéderai à
    > mes courriéls. Pour toute urgence,.vous pouvez communiquer avec Jolene
    > Harvey, Avocate générale, au 613 843 4892 ou avec mon adjointe admin.
    > Sandra Lofaro 613 843 3540.
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: "Moore, Rob - M.P."<Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:33 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Notice of Harassment
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >
    > On behalf of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. thank you for your
    > email. Our office appreciates the time you took to get in touch with
    > our office. Due to the high volume of email correspondence our office
    > receives, below is a guide on how your email will be responded to:
    >
    > Constituent of Fundy Royal:
    >
    > The constituents of Fundy Royal are our office’s priority. Please
    > ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the
    > appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to
    > ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely
    > manner.
    >
    > If your query is case related (i.e. immigration, CPP, EI, CRA, etc.),
    > consent forms will need to be filled out before your file can be
    > activated. If you have not yet filled out our office’s consent form, a
    > staff member will be in contact with you.
    >
    > If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office:
    > 506-832-4200.
    >
    > Event Invitations and Meeting Requests:
    >
    > If you have sent meeting request or an event invitation, we sincerely
    > appreciate the kind request and we will check his availability to see
    > if his schedule can accommodate.
    >
    > Invitations for Fundy Royal are managed in the riding office and
    > Ottawa based events and meetings are managed from the Parliamentary
    > office. The appropriate staff will follow up on your request.
    >
    > Non-Constituent Enquiries:
    >
    > If you are not a Fundy Royal resident, given the high volume of emails
    > we receive, your email will be reviewed and filed as INFORMATION.
    >
    >  If the email is Critic portfolio in nature, it will be responded to
    > as necessary.
    >
    > Again, we sincerely appreciate you taking the time to contact the
    > office of the Honourable Rob Moore.
    >
    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
    > <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    > Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:28:22 +0000
    > Subject: RE: Notice of Harassment
    > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
    >
    > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    > comments.
    >
    > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    > commentaires.
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
    > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:46 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
    > CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
    > on Brian Gallant
    > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
    >
    > Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
    > of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
    >
    > This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
    > Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
    > may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
    > message will be carefully reviewed.
    >
    > To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
    > the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
    >
    > Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
    > Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
    > Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
    > correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
    > directly to the Department of Justice at
    > mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.
    >
    > Thank you
    >
    > -------------------
    >
    > Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
    > Vancouver Granville.
    >
    > Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
    > courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
    > correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
    > votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
    >
    > Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
    > veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
    > votre adresse et votre code postal.
    >
    > Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
    > la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
    > d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
    > Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
    > Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
    > mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
    >
    > Merci
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: "Jensen, Jan"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
    > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:11 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
    > CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
    > on Brian Gallant
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > I will be away from the office and not returning until Monday,
    > November 5th, 2018.   If you require immediate assistance, please
    > contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
    > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 10:55:43 +0000
    > Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by
    > CBC for the benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote
    > on Brian Gallant
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
    >
    > If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
    > support, please contact our Customer Service department at
    > 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
    >
    > If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
    > publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
    >
    > Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
    >
    > This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
    > press releases.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    > Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 06:55:07 -0400
    > Subject: Here is the latest malicious trick pulled by CBC for the
    > benefit of the LIEbranos just before the confidence vote on Brian
    > Gallant
    > To: "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "Alex.Johnston"
    > <Alex.Johnston@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>,
    > Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, "Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1"
    > <Pierre.Paul-Hus.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "pierre.poilievre.a1"
    > <pierre.poilievre.a1@parl.gc.ca>, pierre.paul-hus@parl.gc.ca,
    > ps.publicsafetymcu-securitepubliqueucm.sp@canada.ca, "ralph.goodale"
    > <ralph.goodale@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
    > "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>,
    > "clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, "david.hansen"
    > <david.hansen@justice.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
    > "Dale.Morgan"<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "david.eidt"
    > <david.eidt@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
    > "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
    > <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
    > lorri.warner@justice.gc.ca, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
    > "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
    > <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg"
    > <andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>, "Norman.Sabourin"
    > <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>, "Gib.vanErt"<Gib.vanErt@scc-csc.ca>,
    > "marc.giroux"<marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
    > <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
    > <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, washington field
    > <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>,
    > english@rcinet.ca, "kennedy.stewart"<kennedy.stewart@parl.gc.ca>,
    > pvanloan@airdberlis.com, nicola.diiorio@bcf.ca, "Nicola.DiIorio"
    > <Nicola.DiIorio@parl.gc.ca>, "Catherine.Tait"<Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca>,
    > "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Sophia.Harris"
    > <Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
    > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, "macpherson.don"
    > <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, "David.Akin"
    > <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>,
    > news919 <news919@rogers.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>, news
    > <news@hilltimes.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newstips
    > <newstips@cnn.com>
    >
    > ethinks after all my phone calls emails, tweets, blogs and lawsuit CBC
    > and Brian Galllant can never claim that they didn't know the score
    > N'esy Pas?
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
    > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 13:11:27 +0000
    > Subject: RE: Not long after CBC closed a comment section and erased
    > one of my comments I hear Terry Seguin talking to Sophia Harris about
    > money and shook my head
    > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    >
    > Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.  Please be
    > assured  that your email will be reviewed.
    >
    > If this is a media request, please forward your email to
    > media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>.  Thank you!
    >
    > *************************************
    >
    > Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
    > Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre  courriel sera examiné.
    >
    > Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
    > media-medias@gnb.ca<mailto:media-medias@gnb.ca>.  Merci!
    >

     

     

     

     

     

     


    Bracing for 'a tax season like no other,' CRA hires private firm to answer Canadians' questions

    $
    0
    0

    https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies

     

    Image
    YO @Maximus_news @GovMattersTV @DHS @ToddMNatSec @FRoseDC
    Methinks somebody working for Taxman and the Powers That Be on both sides of the 49th must have read my comments and emails by now N'esy Pas?
     

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/02/bracing-for-tax-season-like-no-other.html 

     

     #nbpoli #cdnpoli #IRS #CRA

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/tax-season-pandemic-private-company-questions-1.5909359

     

    Bracing for 'a tax season like no other,' CRA hires private firm to answer Canadians' questions

     

    Federal tax agency is hiring 2,000 new agents but still bringing in external help

     

    Catherine Cullen· CBC News· Posted: Feb 11, 2021 4:00 AM ET

     

    The Canada Revenue Agency is taking the unusual step of hiring a private firm to help answer questions from Canadians this tax season. The agency says it is expecting a flood of queries related to COVID-19 benefits. (Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press)

    Preparing for what promises to be an extraordinarily busy tax season, the federal government is taking the unusual step of hiring a private company to answer some Canadians' questions about pandemic benefits — a move that has one union warning about privacy concerns.

    Officials with the Canada Revenue Agency insist this is a short-term initiative and that employees of the private company will only answer general questions and won't have access to taxpayers' personal information. 

    "It's nice to say that," said Marc Brière, president of the Union of Taxation Employees, which represents more than 28,000 CRA workers.

    "I understand that these people might not have access to the employee CRA system. But what if a taxpayer, thinking they're calling CRA, inadvertently gave confidential information to the employees of the third party? That can certainly happen. So we're concerned with that." 

    Brière said he also fears that involving a third party will create more confusion for taxpayers who are increasingly being targeted by scam artists claiming to represent the federal government.

    The CRA said the company taking on the benefit inquiries is Maximus Canada and that all agents answering the calls will be based in Canada.

    On its website, Maximus Canada states that it already provides health administration services in 10 of 13 Canadian provinces and territories. It's part of a larger global firm that operates in the United States, Australia, Italy, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, South Korea, Sweden and the United Kingdom and generates about $2.5 billion US in revenue worldwide.

    New staffers to be trained on CRA materials, procedures

    The private sector staffers will be trained with Canada Revenue Agency materials and procedures but will have to refer account-specific questions to the agency's in-house agents, CRA said.

    "They will only respond to general inquiries from Canadians, and do not have any access to their personal information or CRA accounts," said a CRA spokesperson.

    It's not clear how many people are being hired to handle the benefit questions. The CRA said the government has set an "expected service level" and Maxiumus will decide how many people it needs to meet that standard.

    The contract is set to run from February to August.

    "There will be no options to extend the period of the contract," said a CRA spokesperson.

    Brière said he's been told by CRA officials that the company could hire roughly 130 people.

    "We don't think it's respectful to our members that worked like crazy to help out the population and now they're being told those jobs will be given to somebody else. We don't think that's appropriate," he said.

    Pandemic benefits complicate tax season

    Those private sector staffers would be in addition to the roughly 2,000 new employees CRA is hiring to deal with what the agency has said will be "a tax season like no other" in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Many Canadians and businesses have accessed newly-created pandemic benefits, which could complicate tax season.

    WATCH | How the pandemic changes 2020 tax returns:

     

    The COVID-19 pandemic had a big impact on many Canadians’ bottom line and that will result in changes for tax returns, including a work-from-home credit and paying tax on the CERB. Businesses are hoping the government will provide additional support for them and an extension to the filing deadline. 2:03

    It's not clear, for example, how many of the approximately 8.9 million applicants for the Canada Emergency Response Benefit realized the $2,000 per month payments are taxable and set aside money to pay those taxes.

    The CRA said it has been "aggressively hiring" in-house call agents to help address the many tax questions it anticipates. It said that, by March 2021, it expects to have hired and trained about 2,000 new agents who will be able to address Canadians' questions about their tax filings.

    Call centre hours for individual inquiries will also be extended as of Feb. 27 and the agency is adding a new call-back service it said will allow callers to ask for an automated return call "when wait times reach a certain length."

    About the Author

    Catherine Cullen

    Parliamentary Bureau

    Catherine Cullen is a senior reporter covering politics and Parliament Hill in Ottawa.

     

     

    1312 Comments


    View your notifications
    David Amos 
    Content deactivated
    Methinks somebody working for the "Powers That Be" must have read my comments and emails by now N'esy Pas?  
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos 
    Content deactivated
    Awaiting moderation??? Oh My MY




     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Methinks the Minister of Revenue Canada should admit that I have every right to enlighten Maximus Canada as to the doings between the CRA and I since 2004 N'esy Pas?
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @David Amos: Methinks many of my fellow taxpayers should agree that the all knowing Maximus Canada people were not wise to try to play dumb with me today N'esy Pas?
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Curtis Green
    Can we get some adults running the government please?
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Curtis Green: Dream on
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Kevin Last
    September 2011- Maximus Inc. was sued by U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for disability discrimination for failure to promote a female employee because it regarded her as disabled.[83] Maximus settled the lawsuit in August 2012.[84]

    June 2012- Through an internal privacy audit, Maximus discovered that a worker in Canada illegally viewed personal health records of 43 Canadians. The worker involved was immediately suspended and later fired. Health critic and member of the New Democratic Party Mike Farnworth said the incident was disturbing. "It's concerning, we've had concerns about Maximus in the past," he said. "I think what I would like to know - is this an isolated incident? Has it happened in the past?" Ryan Jabs, spokesman for the British Columbia Health Ministry said,"The risk is really low level because it looks like he or she was accessing the information out of curiosity but not for any fraudulent activity."[85]

    January 2013- A Maximus employee, Marilyn Beltran, based in Boston MA was indicted for allegedly stealing more than $490,000 from the Massachusetts Medicaid program. The theft had occurred over a period of nine years.[86]

    2016 the New York City Public Advocate Letitia James sued the city's Department of Education over a system built by Maximus. The system, called SESIS, was meant to help the city track services for students with disabilities, but was prone to malfunctions and did not fully answer its original defined functional scope. The system had cost the city ~$130 million to build, but also incurred at least ~$356 million more in lost Medicaid reimbursements

    Sounds like this company has a solid history of protecting peoples privacy. Definatly a good company to work along side the directions of our liberal government. 
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Kevin Last: Thanks for the info
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Todd Donly
    Probably awarded contract to SNC
     
     
    Kevin Last
    Reply to @Todd Donly: its funny you bring that one up, guess who got another record breaking contract without having to meet the criteria like other contractors?
     
     
    Eric Smith
    Reply to @Kevin Last: WE
     
     
    Kevin Last
    Reply to @Eric Smith: oh maybe haven't seen that one yet, their is always the possibility but I am referring to another SNC contract. The specs are no where close to the requirements but hey like JTs stance on everything it should work itself out in the end. The unfortunate part is its always at the expense of the tax paying citizens.
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Kevin Last: I concur
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Jackson Paxton
    Government and incompetent are frequently mentioned in the same breath.
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Jackson Paxton: Welcome to the Circus
     
     
     
     

    Trump, Giuliani sued in federal court over role in Capitol riot

    $
    0
    0

     


     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-giuliani-capitol-riot-suit-1.5915344#vf-all_threads-4728400020132

     

    Trump, Giuliani sued in federal court over role in Capitol riot

    Proud Boys, Oath Keepers also accused in suit of conspiring against Congress to perform its duties

     

    The Associated Press· Posted: Feb 16, 2021 2:44 PM ET

     


    Donald Trump was acquitted in his second impeachment trial by a vote of 57-43 in the U.S. Senate. 5:32

    A Democratic congressman accused Donald Trump in a federal lawsuit on Tuesday of inciting the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol and of conspiring with his lawyer and extremist groups to try to prevent Congress from certifying the results of the presidential election he lost to Joe Biden.

    The lawsuit filed on behalf of Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson by Joseph Sellers, a Washington lawyer, and the NAACP, is part of an expected wave of litigation over the Jan. 6 riot and is believed to be the first filed by a member of Congress. Thompson, the Democratic chair of the House's homeland security committee, could be joined by other members of Congress, lawyers said.

    The case also names as defendants the former Republican president's personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, and groups including the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, extremist organizations that had members charged by the Justice Department with taking part in the siege. The suit seeks unspecified punitive and compensatory damages.

    A Trump adviser, Jason Miller, said in a statement Tuesday that Trump did not organize the rally that preceded the riot and "did not incite or conspire to incite any violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6th." A lawyer for Giuliani did not immediately return an email seeking comment.

    The suit, filed in federal court in Washington under a Reconstruction-era law known as the Ku Klux Klan Act, comes after Trump was acquitted on Feb. 13 in a Senate impeachment trial that centred on allegations that he incited the riot that saw five people in attendance die, including a Trump supporter who was fatally shot and a Capitol police officer who was killed in circumstances that are still unclear. Three others suffered fatal medical episodes, according to reports.

    Trump's acquittal is likely to open the door to fresh legal scrutiny over his actions before and during the siege.

    WATCH | McConnell highly critical of Trump despite vote to acquit:


    Mitch McConnell, the Senate's top Republican, excoriated Donald Trump on Saturday for the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, but defended his vote to acquit him at the impeachment trial. 2:49

    Even some Republicans who voted to acquit Trump on Saturday acknowledged that the more proper venue to deal with Trump was in the courts, especially now that he has left the White House and lost certain legal protections that shielded him as president.

    "We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation and former presidents are not immune from being accountable by either one," Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said from the chamber floor after the Senate voted 57-43 to find Trump guilty of the impeachment charge, a result that didn't meet the threshold of a two-thirds majority for a conviction.

    Riot a 'foreseeable culmination,' suit alleges

    The suit traces the drawn-out effort by Trump and Giuliani to cast doubt on the election results even though courts across the country, and state election officials, repeatedly rejected their baseless allegations of fraud.

    Despite evidence to the contrary, the suit says, the men portrayed the election as stolen while Trump "endorsed rather than discouraged" threats of violence from his angry supporters in the weeks leading up to the assault on the Capitol.

    "The carefully orchestrated series of events that unfolded at the Save America rally and the storming of the Capitol was no accident or coincidence," the suit says. "It was the intended and foreseeable culmination of a carefully co-ordinated campaign to interfere with the legal process required to confirm the tally of votes cast in the Electoral College."


    Rudy Giuliani, former U.S. president Donald Trump's personal lawyer, was at the pro-Trump rally in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, where he encouraged a 'trial by combat' in his speech. (Jim Bourg/Reuters)

    Presidents are historically afforded broad immunity from lawsuits for actions they take in their role as commander-in-chief. But the lawsuit filed Tuesday was brought against Trump in his personal, not official, capacity and alleges that none of the behaviour at issue had to do with his responsibilities as president.

    "Inciting a riot, or attempting to interfere with the congressional efforts to ratify the results of the election that are commended by the Constitution, could not conceivably be within the scope of ordinary responsibilities of the president," Sellers said in an AP interview.

    "In this respect, because of his conduct, he is just like any other private citizen," Sellers said.

    Mobile users: View the document
    (PDF KB)
    (Text KB)
    CBC is not responsible for 3rd party content

    Though the impeachment case focused squarely on accusations of incitement, the lawsuit more broadly accuses Trump of conspiring to disrupt the constitutional activities of Congress — namely, the certification of election results establishing Biden as the rightful winner — through a months-long effort to discredit the outcome and to lean on individual states and his own vice-president to overturn the contest.

    The case against Trump was brought under a provision of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, which was passed in response to KKK violence and prohibits violence or intimidation meant to prevent Congress or other federal officials from carrying out their constitutional duties.

    "Fortunately, this hasn't been used very much," Sellers said. "But what we see here is so unprecedented that it's really reminiscent of what gave rise to the enactment of this legislation right after the Civil War."

    Defending use of 'trial by combat'

    The suit cites incendiary comments that Trump and Giuliani made in the weeks leading up to the riot and on the day of it that lawyers say were designed to mobilize supporters to work to overturn the election results and to prevent the Senate's certification process. That process was temporarily interrupted when Trump loyalists broke into the Capitol.

    Giuliani has said his exhortation to those in attendance for a "trial by combat" was a Game of Thrones reference to encourage investigations of voting systems used in the Nov. 3 vote.

    Dominion Voting Systems, which has headquarters in Toronto, is one of two voting software companies to target Trump allies in lawsuits due to their rhetoric and unproven allegations of fraud.

    Trump told supporters at a rally preceding the riot to "fight like hell," but lawyers for the former president adamantly denied during the impeachment trial that he had incited the riot. They pointed to a remark during his speech in which he told the crowd to behave "peacefully" that day.

    Defence lawyers are likely to revisit those assertions in the lawsuit. They may also argue, as was done during the impeachment case, that Trump's speech was protected by the First Amendment.

    House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Monday that her chamber will move to establish an independent, Sept. 11-style commission to look into the insurrection. Pelosi said the commission will "investigate and report on the facts and causes" relating to the attack and "the interference with the peaceful transfer of power."

    At the White House on Tuesday, press secretary Jen Psaki said the president supports the formation of a commission. Biden "backs efforts to shed additional light on the facts to ensure something like that never happens again," she said.

    With files from CBC News

     

     

     

    3467 Comments 
    Commenting is now closed for this story. Shut down 3 hours early after a lot of editing

     

     


    David Amos
    Methinks "The Donald" and his buddy Rudy know why I called many Yankees today N'esy Pas?
    Reply to @David Amos: Too bad so sad the thread of Douglas Keith III went "Poof" before I could save it
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    John Douglas 
    Trump continues to defraud his cult saps for their money while throwing them under the bus after they followed his orders
     
     

    David Amos
    Reply to @John Douglas: Yea Right

     

     

     

     


    Douglas Keith III
    Oh come on.
    Both sides are guilty of rhetoric.
    If you don't charge the people in this video of incitement then you have list all crwdibility in your pursuit for justice.
    https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1859953731965

     
     
    John Douglas
    Reply to @Douglas Keith III:
    trumpy non sequiturs don't count
     
     

    David Amos
    Reply to @John Douglas: Nor do you
     
     

    David Amos
    Reply to @Douglas Keith III: If you recall I said a few things in support of your opinion earlier in your thread between a Douglas comment and mine that went "Poof" before I could save it. That said I repeat methinks folks who are fond of the Feds should check my work in Federal Courts on both sides of the 49th N'esy Pas? 
     
     

    David Amos
    Methinks "The Donald" and his buddy Rudy know why I called many Yankees today N'esy Pas?
    Reply to @David Amos: Too bad so sad the thread of Douglas Keith III went "Poof" before I could save it
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    John Douglas 
    Trump continues to defraud his cult saps for their money while throwing them under the bus after they followed his orders
     
     

    David Amos
    Reply to @John Douglas: Yea Right
     
     
     

    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/16/us/politics/naacp-sues-trump-giuliani-proud-boys-capitol.html

     

    N.A.A.C.P. Sues Trump and Giuliani Over Election Fight and Jan. 6 Riot

    The civil rights group brought the suit on behalf of Representative Bennie Thompson of Mississippi, with other Democrats in Congress expected to join as plaintiffs.

    Representative Bennie Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi, filed a lawsuit on Tuesday against former President Donald J. Trump and others over the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol.Credit...Anna Moneymaker/The New York Times

    WASHINGTON — The N.A.A.C.P. on Tuesday morning filed a federal lawsuit against former President Donald J. Trump and his personal lawyer Rudolph W. Giuliani, claiming that they violated a 19th century statute when they tried to prevent the certification of the election on Jan. 6.

    The civil rights organization brought the suit on behalf of Representative Bennie Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi. Other Democrats in Congress — including Representatives Hank Johnson of Georgia and Bonnie Watson Coleman of New Jersey — are expected to join as plaintiffs in the coming weeks, according to the N.A.A.C.P.

    The lawsuit contends that Mr. Trump and Mr. Giuliani violated the Ku Klux Klan Act, an 1871 statute that includes protections against violent conspiracies that interfered with Congress’s constitutional duties; the suit also names the Proud Boys, the far-right nationalist group, and the Oath Keepers militia group. The legal action accuses Mr. Trump, Mr. Giuliani and the two groups of conspiring to incite a violent riot at the Capitol, with the goal of preventing Congress from certifying the election.

    The suit is the latest legal problem for Mr. Trump: New York prosecutors are investigating his financial dealings; New York’s attorney general is pursuing a civil investigation into whether Mr. Trump’s company misstated assets to get bank loans and tax benefits; and a Georgia district attorney is examining his election interference effort there.

    Jason Miller, an adviser to Mr. Trump, noted in response to the lawsuit that the Senate had acquitted the former president of the article of impeachment on inciting an insurrection. The Senate voted 57-43, falling short of the two-thirds majority required to convict.

     

    “President Trump did not plan, produce or organize the Jan. 6 rally on the Ellipse. President Trump did not incite or conspire to incite any violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6,” Mr. Miller said in a statement on Tuesday. He added that Mr. Giuliani “is not currently representing President Trump in any legal matters.”

    In the lawsuit, Mr. Thompson said he was forced to wear a gas mask and hide on the floor of the House gallery for three hours while hearing “threats of physical violence against any member who attempted to proceed to approve the Electoral College ballot count.” Mr. Thompson also heard a gunshot, according to the suit, which he did not learn until later had killed Ashli Babbitt, one of the rioters in the Capitol lobby.

    Mr. Thompson is seeking compensatory and punitive damages in the lawsuit filed in Federal District Court in Washington. The suit does not include a specific financial amount.

    Mr. Thompson, 72, claims he was put at an increased health risk by later being required to shelter in place in a cramped area that did not allow for social distancing. The lawsuit notes that Mr. Thompson shared confined space with two members of Congress who tested positive for the coronavirus shortly after the attack at the Capitol.

    In an interview on Monday, Mr. Thompson said he would not have brought the suit against Mr. Trump if the Senate had voted to convict him in last week’s impeachment trial.

    “I feared for my life,” Mr. Thompson said. “Not a day passes that I don’t think about this incident. I was committed to seeing justice brought to this situation.”

    He added: “This is me, and hopefully others, having our day in court to address the atrocities of Jan. 6. I trust the better judgment of the courts because obviously Republican members of the Senate could not do what the evidence overwhelmingly presented.”

    Mr. Thompson said he had already received a second dose of a Covid vaccine by Jan. 6 and therefore did not quarantine after his close contacts with colleagues who tested positive. But he noted, “There were a number of members who were very concerned about being housed in those numbers with people refusing to wear masks.”

    Both Democratic and Republican members of Congress have recently raised the prospect of Mr. Trump being held accountable in the courts for the riot. Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader, voted to acquit Mr. Trump in the impeachment trial but then appeared to encourage people to take their fight to the courts.

    “He didn’t get away with anything, yet,” Mr. McConnell said at the trial’s conclusion, noting: “We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation.”

    Derrick Johnson, president of the N.A.A.C.P., said the decision to seek compensatory and punitive damages was rooted in a history of tools that have worked to fight back against white supremacy.

    “The Southern Poverty Law Center filed a lawsuit against the Ku Klux Klan that bankrupted a chapter,” he said, referring to a 2008 judgment against a Kentucky-based Klan outfit that ordered the group to pay $2.5 million in damages. “This is very similar. If we do nothing, we can be ensured these groups will continue to spread and grow in their boldness. We must curb the spread of white supremacy.”

    While much of the focus of the impeachment trial rested on how the violent mob was threatening former Vice President Mike Pence as well as congressional leaders like the House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, N.A.A.C.P. officials said the attack was deeply rooted in racial injustice.

    “Underlying this insurrection were the actions of folks who were challenging the voices of people of color,” said Janette McCarthy Wallace, interim general counsel of the N.A.A.C.P. “If you look at whose votes were being challenged, these came from largely urban areas. The votes of people of color were being challenged.”

    The suit, for instance, charges Mr. Giuliani with attempting to reject “the votes cast by voters in Detroit, the population of which is 78 percent African-American.” It also says Mr. Giuliani inaccurately claimed there was fraud in voting in Milwaukee and Madison, Wis., “both of which have large African-American populations.”

    Joseph M. Sellers, a partner at the civil rights law firm Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll, which jointly filed the case, said the lawsuit named Mr. Trump in his personal capacity because his conduct challenging another branch of government to do its job falls outside the official duties of the president.

    “He was engaging in conduct that is so far outside any remotely legitimate scope of his presidential duties,” Mr. Sellers said. “He no longer has the immunity of the president.”

    Annie Karni is a White House correspondent. She previously covered the White House and Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign for Politico, and covered local news and politics for the New York Post and the New York Daily News. @AnnieKarni

    A version of this article appears in print on Feb. 17, 2021, Section A, Page 12 of the New York edition with the headline: N.A.A.C.P. Files Federal Suit Against Trump and Giuliani






    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

    HON. BENNIE G. THOMPSON, in his

    personal capacity,

    2466 Rayburn House Office Building

    U.S. House of Representatives

    Washington, DC 20515

    Plaintiff,

    v.

    DONALD J. TRUMP, solely in his personal

    capacity

    Mar-A-Lago

    1100 S. Ocean Blvd.

    Palm Beach, Florida 33480-5004,

    RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI,

    Rudolph W Giuliani, PLLC

    445 Park Ave FL 18

    New York, NY 10022-2606

    PROUD BOYS INTERNATIONAL, L.L.C.,

    c/o Jason L. Van Dyke

    108 Durango Dr.

    Crossroads, TX, 76227, and

    OATH KEEPERS,

    Attn: Stewart Rhodes

    1030 E. Hwy 377

    Ste 110-285

    Granbury, TX 76048

    4625 West Nevso Drive, Suite 2 & 3

    Las Vegas, NV, 89103

    Defendants.

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    )

    Civil Action No. ____________

    COMPLAINT

    JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

    COMPLAINT

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 32

     

    2

    INTRODUCTION

    1. On and before January 6, 2021, the Defendants Donald J. Trump, Rudolph W.

    Giuliani, Proud Boys, and Oath Keepers conspired to incite an assembled crowd to march upon

    and enter the Capitol of the United States for the common purpose of disrupting, by the use of

    force, intimidation and threat, the approval by Congress of the count of votes cast by members of

    the Electoral College as required by Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution. In

    doing so, the Defendants each intended to prevent, and ultimately delayed, members of Congress

    from discharging their duty commanded by the United States Constitution to approve the results

    of the Electoral College in order to elect the next President and Vice President of the United

    States.

    2. Plaintiff, the Honorable Bennie G. Thompson, Member of the United States

    House of Representatives, brings this action against the Defendants for conspiring to prevent him

    and other Members of Congress from discharging these official duties, in violation of 42 U.S.C.

    § 1985(1). Enacted as the “Ku Klux Klan Act” in 1871, Section 1985(1) was intended to protect

    against conspiracies, through violence and intimidation, that sought to prevent Members of

    Congress from discharging their official duties. The statute was enacted in response to violence

    and intimidation in which the Ku Klux Klan and other organizations were engaged during that

    time period.

    3. The Defendants conspired to prevent, by force, intimidation and threats, the

    Plaintiff, as a Member of Congress, from discharging his official duties to approve the count of

    votes cast by members of the Electoral College following the presidential election held in

    November 2020.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 2 of 32

     

    3

    4. In furtherance of this common goal of preventing the timely approval of the

    Electoral College vote count, the Defendants acted in concert to incite and then carry out a riot at

    the Capitol by promoting an assembly of persons to engage in tumultuous and violent conduct or

    the threat of it that created grave danger of harm to the Plaintiff and to other Members of

    Congress.

    5. This conduct jointly undertaken to threaten the Plaintiff and other Members of

    Congress in order to disrupt the Electoral College vote count was part of an ongoing course of

    action pursued by the Defendants for the purpose of contesting the announced results of the

    presidential election held in November 2020 and preventing the duly elected President and Vice

    President from attaining approval of Congress of their election necessary to their inauguration.

    6. The insurrection at the Capitol was a direct, intended, and foreseeable result of the

    Defendants’ unlawful conspiracy. It was instigated according to a common plan that the

    Defendants pursued since the election held in November 2020, culminating in an assembly

    denominated as the “Save America” rally held at the Ellipse in Washington, D.C. on January 6,

    2021, during which Defendants Trump and Giuliani incited a crowd of thousands to descend

    upon the Capitol in order to prevent or delay through the use of force the counting of Electoral

    College votes. As part of this unified plan to prevent the counting of Electoral College votes,

    Defendants Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, through their leadership, acted in concert to

    spearhead the assault on the Capitol while the angry mob that Defendants Trump and Giuliani

    incited descended on the Capitol. The carefully orchestrated series of events that unfolded at the

    Save America rally and the storming of the Capitol was no accident or coincidence. It was the

    intended and foreseeable culmination of a carefully coordinated campaign to interfere with the

    legal process required to confirm the tally of votes cast in the Electoral College.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 3 of 32

     

    4

    7. While not all of the Defendants in this action were physically present at the

    Capitol during this attack on the Plaintiff and other Members of Congress, the events that

    occurred were the natural, foreseeable and intended consequence of the Defendants’ coordinated

    campaign to use intimidation, harassment and threats in an attempt to prevent Congress from

    discharging its legally required duty to preside over, and approve, the count of the Electoral

    College votes which ultimately confirmed that Defendant Trump’s opponent was elected the next

    President of the United States.

    8. Accordingly, this action seeks the award of compensatory damages to redress the

    harm to the Plaintiff caused by the Defendants’ use of intimidation, harassment and threats of

    violence to interfere with his discharge of his legally required duty as a Member of Congress and

    punitive damages to punish the Defendants for the reckless and malicious manner in which they

    acted and to enjoin and deter a recurrence of this unlawful conduct.

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    9. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this suit pursuant to 28

    U.S.C. § 1331 because the claim in this case arises under the laws of the United States.

    10. Venue is proper in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2)

    because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in this

    district.

    THE PARTIES

    11. Plaintiff Bennie G. Thompson is the duly elected Representative of the Second

    Congressional District of Mississippi. On January 6, 2021, Rep. Thompson was present in the

    Capitol in order to discharge his legally required duty to observe and approve the count of votes

    cast by members of the Electoral College for the election of President and Vice-President of the

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 4 of 32

     

    5

    United States. As described in more detail below, Rep. Thompson was hindered, delayed,

    impeded and almost completely prevented from carrying out these duties because of the

    Defendants’ unlawful actions. Rep. Thompson brings this suit in his personal capacity.

    12. Defendant Donald J. Trump was the President of the United States from January

    20, 2017 until noon Eastern Standard Time on January 20, 2021. Defendant Trump is a resident

    of the state of Florida. As described in more detail below, Defendant Trump, acting solely in his

    personal capacity, conspired with others with the purpose of preventing, by force, intimidation

    and threats, the Plaintiff and other Members of Congress from discharging their duty to approve

    the results of the Electoral College vote and certify the results of the presidential election held in

    November, 2020. Defendant Trump is sued in his personal capacity.

    13. Defendant Rudolph William Giuliani has acted as a confidant of Defendant

    Trump. The actions attributed to Defendant Giuliani were undertaken in his personal capacity

    and not as an officer of the United States. He is a resident of New York. As discussed in more

    detail below, Defendant Giuliani acted in concert with other Defendants to prevent the Plaintiff

    and other Members of Congress from discharging their duty to approve the results of the

    Electoral College vote and certify the results of the presidential election held in November 2020.

    14. Proud Boys International, L.L.C. (“Proud Boys”) is a Texas Limited Liability

    Company with multiple chapters in the United States and main offices located in Crossroads,

    Texas. The organization describes itself as a “pro-Western fraternal organization for men who

    refuse to apologize for creating the modern world; aka Western Chauvinists.” Proud Boys

    members have participated in multiple events that have supported and promoted views that were

    highly critical of positions advanced during the presidential campaign of then Vice President

    Biden and views that were strongly supportive of positions advanced during the presidential

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 5 of 32

     

    6

    campaign of then President Trump. It also has repeatedly employed and supported the use of

    violence in its opposition to views with which it differed, such as the views expressed by leaders

    of the Black Lives Matter movement. Proud Boys members can often be identified by the

    yellow and black colors they wear as well as by logos and emblems that are identified with the

    Proud Boys organization. As described in more detail below, Proud Boys was involved in

    organizing and carrying out the insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, in pursuit of a

    purpose shared by Defendants Trump and Giuliani, as part of a jointly conceived and executed

    plan to prevent the counting of Electoral Votes confirming Defendant Trump’s opponent as the

    next President.

    15. Defendant Oath Keepers is a militia organization incorporated as a non-profit

    corporation in Nevada, with its main office located in Las Vegas, Nevada, whose members are

    comprised of current and former military and law enforcement officers who express the view that

    the federal government is trying to strip American citizens of their rights. The organization’s

    name is derived from the oath that all military and police take to “defend the Constitution against

    all enemies, foreign and domestic.” The organization and its leadership have routinely stated

    that it is preparing for or engaged in a civil war. As described in more detail below, Oath

    Keepers was directly involved in organizing and carrying out the insurrection at the Capitol on

    January 6, 2021 in pursuit of a purpose shared by Defendants Trump, Giuliani and Proud Boys.

    STATEMENT OF FACTS

    I. Defendants’ Actions Leading Up to the “Save America” Rally

    16. The attack on the Capitol that occurred on January 6, 2021 was no accident.

    Since the results of the election held in November 2020 were announced, Defendant Trump, in

    concert with Defendant Giuliani, mobilized supporters by mounting a campaign of

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 6 of 32

     

    7

    misinformation and anger-laden rhetoric to challenge the validity of the election results in

    support of the false contention that Defendant Trump had actually won the election

    notwithstanding the results certified by every state in the Union that demonstrated otherwise.

    17. During the presidential campaign, Defendant Trump repeatedly declined to agree

    that, regardless of the outcome of the election, he would ensure a peaceful transition of power.

    In doing so, he solicited the support of, and endorsed the belligerent and violent actions of,

    organizations such as the Proud Boys that expressed support of his reelection.

    18. During this time, Defendant Trump actively and enthusiastically supported armed

    protesters who used threats and, at times, violence in the pursuit of their political and social

    agendas. For example, after state governments began implementing restrictions on access to

    public facilities in response to the spread of the COVID-19, Defendant Trump referred to

    supporters who threatened the use of violence in resisting these restrictions as the “Trump Army”

    and the “first line of defense when it comes to fighting off the Liberal mob.”

    19. In another illustration of Defendant Trump’s endorsement of the threat of

    violence, after a caravan of Trump supporters swarmed a Biden campaign bus on November 1,

    2020, nearly causing a violent accident and leading to the cancellation of a Biden campaign

    event, Defendant Trump praised the mob, saying, “These patriots did nothing wrong.”

    20. After the votes were tallied from the election held on November 3, 2020,

    Defendants Trump and Giuliani initiated a campaign in which they reported that the announced

    vote tallies were the product of fraud and that Defendant Trump in fact won the election,

    notwithstanding that these assertions were repeatedly rejected by the courts and the states to

    which they were presented.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 7 of 32

     

    8

    21. On November 4, 2020, Defendant Trump declared that he had won the

    presidential election, notwithstanding that some votes cast had not yet been counted.

    22. After all the votes had been counted and former Vice President Joseph Biden was

    declared the victor, Defendants Trump and Giuliani and Defendant Trump’s supporters

    embarked on a campaign to challenge as fraudulent the vote results in more than 60 lawsuits

    filed in various state and federal courts.

    23. Notwithstanding that the allegations of fraud were repeatedly rejected by the

    courts in which these suits were filed, Defendants Trump and Giuliani together maintained that

    Defendant Trump had actually prevailed in the election and continued to attack the integrity of

    the state election offices and officials and the election results in those states that reported

    Defendant Trump received fewer votes than then-former Vice President Biden.

    24. Defendant Trump communicated these inflammatory and demonstrably false

    views through various social media outlets, including Twitter, through which he had 89 million

    followers.

    25. Similarly, at a press conference held in the parking lot of Four Seasons Total

    Landscaping in Pennsylvania held on November 7, 2020, Defendant Giuliani stated that there

    had been widespread voter fraud in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh which he claimed accounted for

    Defendant Trump’s loss in that state. Both cities have large African American populations.

    26. Defendant Giuliani claimed that Philadelphia had “a sad history of voter

    fraud.” He also named deceased African Americans, whom he falsely claimed were still allowed

    to vote.

    27. In another episode in the campaign mounted by Defendants Trump and Giuliani,

    Defendant Giuliani said, “The margin in Michigan was 146,121, and these ballots were all cast

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 8 of 32

     

    9

    basically in Detroit, that Biden won 80-20. So, you see a change as a result in the election in

    Michigan if you take out Wayne County, so it’s a very significant case.” As a result, Defendant

    Giuliani advocated rejecting the votes cast by voters in Detroit, the population of which is 78

    percent African American. No evidence of such fraud was ever produced or found by any court

    or state agency.

    28. In still another episode in this campaign to instill doubt in the integrity of the

    electoral process, Defendant Giuliani asserted at a press conference held on November 19, 2020

    that Defendant Trump’s loss in Wisconsin was attributed to fraud in voting in Milwaukee and

    Madison, Wisconsin, both of which have large African American populations.

    29. In response to Defendant Trump and Giuliani’s repeated assertions that voting in

    states where Defendant Trump lost was tainted by fraud, some supporters of Defendant Trump,

    with his urging and support, harassed election workers in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada,

    Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and other states and attempted to interfere with and/or stop the vote

    count in those states.

    30. Defendant Trump persisted in casting doubt on the integrity of the electoral

    process in states where he lost and encouraging supporters to do the same, notwithstanding that

    state election officials found no evidence of fraud and resistance to the election results expressed

    by his supporters grew increasingly shrill and accusatory. Although officials rebutted the

    allegations of fraud and urged calmer exchanges over the election results, supporters of

    Defendant Trump, with his expressed support, continued to engage in personal and accusatory

    attacks.

    31. Georgia Republican election official Gabriel Sterling, for example, pleaded with

    Trump to “[s]top inspiring people to commit potential acts of violence. Someone is going to get

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 9 of 32

     

    10

    shot, someone is going to get killed. And it’s not right.” This plea, like others from state

    election officials, went unheeded by Trump and his supporters.

    32. Other threats of violence expressed by Trump supporters, with his endorsement,

    continued unabated. On December 6, 2020, for example, armed protestors arrived at the home of

    Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, threatening violence after the results of the

    election.

    33. Similarly, on December 8, the official Twitter account of the Arizona GOP asked

    supporters if they were willing to die for Defendant Trump, accompanied by a clip from the

    movie “Rambo.”

    34. Acknowledging the existence of these threats of violence, Trump endorsed rather

    than discouraged them. On December 10, 2020, for example, he tweeted: “People are upset, and

    they have a right to be. Georgia not only supported Trump in 2016, but now. This is the only

    State in the Deep South that went for Biden? Have they lost their minds? This is going to

    escalate dramatically. This is a very dangerous moment in our history....” Notwithstanding the

    danger that these threats of violence could escalate, Defendant Trump continued to claim that he

    had won elections in states where the state-certified vote tallies showed otherwise.

    35. As states finished certifying the official election results, confirming that

    Defendant Trump had lost the presidential election, Defendants Trump and Giuliani began

    characterizing the presidential election as stolen. On December 12, 2020, “Stop the Steal” rallies

    occurred across the country where violence erupted among the demonstrators. Rather than

    urging the demonstrators to act peacefully, Defendant Trump expressed his unqualified support

    of those who participated in these rallies and their violent tactics and tweeted, “I’ll be seeing

    them!”

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 10 of 32

     

    11

    36. Turning his attention away from challenging the state election results and toward

    the final count of the Electoral College votes by Congress on January 6, 2021, Defendant Trump

    began to rally his supporters to descend on Washington at that time. He tweeted: “Statistically

    impossible to have lost the 2020 Election” and “Big protest in DC on January 6th. Be there, will

    be wild!”

    37. In the days leading up to the “Save America” rally scheduled for January 6, 2021,

    Defendant Trump repeatedly issued messages to his supporters expressing support for the use of

    violent means to secure his reelection and stop the process confirming the election of former

    Vice President Biden.

    38. On social media message boards used by Trump supporters, supporters referred to

    the need to “go to war” against those who they regarded as unreceptive to Defendant Trump’s

    efforts to secure his reelection.

    39. In yet another warning that the incendiary remarks expressed by Trump could

    lead to violence, on December 28, 2020, former White House official Olivia Troye expressed

    concern “that there will be violence on January 6th because the president himself encourages it.”

    Ms. Troye continued, “This is what [Trump] does. He tweets. He incites it. He gets his

    followers and supporters to behave in this manner, and these people think they they’re being

    patriotic because they are supporting Donald Trump.”

    40. Nonetheless, on January 1, 2021, Defendant Trump retweeted a tweet from the

    chair of Women for America First, an organizer of the “Save America” rally, stating, “The

    cavalry [sic] is coming, Mr. President!”

    41. On December 29, 2020, Enrique Tarrio, Chairman of the Proud Boys, posted a

    message on the social media site Parler about the demonstration planned for January 6, 2021.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 11 of 32

     

    12

    Among other things, Tarrio announced that the Proud Boys would “turn out in record numbers

    on Jan 6th but this time with a twist… We will not be wearing our traditional Black and Yellow.

    We will be incognito and we will be spread across downtown DC in smaller teams. And who

    knows … we might dress in all BLACK for the occasion.” Law enforcement investigating the

    Capitol insurrection has attributed the statement about dressing in “all BLACK” as a reference to

    dressing like the group known as “Antifa,” whom the Proud Boys have identified as an enemy of

    their movement and are often depicted in the media wearing all black to demonstrations.

    42. In early January, Proud Boys leader Joseph Biggs posted on the social media

    platform Parler: “Every lawmaker who breaks their own stupid Fucking laws should be dragged

    out of office and hung.”

    43. In an interview posted online on or about January 3, 2021, Mr. Biggs described

    the Proud Boys’ efforts to organize and participate in events, stating that the group carefully

    plans ahead around a common objective for the group to achieve at the event.

    44. Defendant Trump encouraged and condoned the violence in which the Proud

    Boys engaged. When asked to denounce the Proud Boys during the September 28, 2020

    presidential debate, which had followed events over the summer in which Proud Boys members

    were reported to have promoted and engaged in violence during rallies, Defendant Trump

    condoned, rather than condemned, their violent conduct, telling members of the group: “Proud

    Boys, stand back and stand by.”

    45. Understanding that Defendant Trump was endorsing their violent conduct and

    enlisting them for future conflicts, Proud Boys Chairman Tarrio responded by tweeting:

    “Standing by sir.”

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 12 of 32

     

    13

    46. Thomas Caldwell, a leader of Defendant Oath Keepers, was also directly involved

    in coordinating and preparing for the insurrection at the Capitol.

    47. On January 1, 2021, Caldwell sent a Facebook message with information about a

    hotel in Northern Virginia where Oath Keepers members could stay and assemble when they

    came to Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021, stating that the hotel had “a good location and

    would allow us to hunt at night if we wanted to.” This message further stated that gathering on

    January 6 would be a “call to arms.”

    48. Following his father’s lead, on January 4, 2021, at a campaign rally in Georgia,

    Donald Trump Jr. rallied the crowd by stating, “They’re not taking this White House. We’re

    going to fight like hell.”

    49. Stoking the anger and fervor of the crowd assembled in Washington, D.C. for the

    “Stop the Steal” rally scheduled for January 6, 2021, at a rally at Freedom Plaza in Washington,

    D.C. held on January 5, 2021, the leader of the “Stop the Steal” event led the crowd of Trump

    supporters in a chant of: “Victory or death!”

    50. On the morning of January 6, 2021, before the Congressional approval of the

    Electoral College vote count was scheduled to occur later that day, Defendant Trump sent a

    message by twitter to Vice President Pence, encouraging him to refuse to allow the state-certified

    Electoral College ballots to be counted, as the Electoral Count Act of 1887 required. Instead,

    Defendant Trump stated, “All Mike Pence has to do is send [the election] back to the States,

    AND WE WIN.”

    51. The Electoral Count Act of 1887 requires that Congress convene on January 6 at

    1:00 PM of the year after each presidential election in order to count the ballots cast by members

    of the Electoral College and, absent objection to any of the ballots, certify the count to the Vice

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 13 of 32

     

    14

    President, acting as President of the Senate, who is required to formally declare the victor in the

    election.

    52. Defendant Trump’s proposal to Vice President Pence as the President of the

    Senate, that he decline to count the Electoral College ballots and, instead of declaring the winner

    of the election, send the election back to the states, was in direct contravention of the legal

    requirements that the Electoral Count Act of 1887 imposed on the Vice President.

    II. The Actions of Defendants Trump and Giuliani at the “Save America” Rally

    53. On the morning of January 6, 2021, before the “Save America” rally, Defendant

    Trump urged his followers to resist the final count of the Electoral College ballots, misinforming

    them in a tweet that “The States want to redo their votes. They found out they voted on a

    FRAUD. Legislatures never approved. Let them do it. BE STRONG!” No state ever expressed

    the view, attributed to them by Defendant Trump, that they wanted to “redo their votes.”

    54. Defendant Giuliani spoke immediately before Defendant Trump. In remarks

    mirroring Defendant Trump’s prior messages, Defendant Giuliani began by making a series of

    statements about the election contradicted by the state election officers, calling the votes lawfully

    cast in favor of President Biden “crooked ballots” and stating that he was “going to find

    criminality” and “proof this election was stolen.” Then, he incited the crowd to take violent

    action, stating, “If we’re right, a lot of them will go to jail. So, let’s have trial by combat … I’ll

    be darned if they’re going to take our free and fair vote … We’re going to fight to the very end to

    make sure that doesn’t happen.”

    55. Then, Defendant Trump addressed the assembled crowd. Defendant Trump

    began by condemning his political opposition and repeating the same unproven accusation,

    rejected by the state election officers, that the election was stolen from him: “Hundreds of

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 14 of 32

     

    15

    thousands of American patriots are committed to the honesty of our elections and the integrity of

    our glorious Republic. All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by

    emboldened radical left Democrats, which is what they’re doing and stolen by the fake news

    media. That’s what they’ve done and what they’re doing. We will never give up. We will never

    concede, it doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.” No state or court

    has credited Defendant Trump’s assertion that his opportunity to win the presidential election

    was “stolen” from him.

    56. Defendant Trump then began stoking the crowd’s anger and urging them to take

    action to forcibly seize control of the process for counting and approving the Electoral College

    ballots, stating: “Republicans are constantly fighting like a boxer with his hands tied behind his

    back. It’s like a boxer, and we want to be so nice. We want to be so respectful of everybody,

    including bad people. We’re going to have to fight much harder and Mike Pence is going to

    have to come through for us. If he doesn’t, that will be a sad day for our country because you’re

    sworn to uphold our constitution. Now it is up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on

    our democracy. After this, we’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you. We’re going to

    walk down. We’re going to walk down any one you want, but I think right here. We’re going

    walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave Senators, and Congressmen and

    women. We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll

    never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be

    strong.” It was Defendant Trump’s efforts to undermine the legitimacy of the presidential

    election results, not the lawful actions of the state election officials, that constituted the

    “egregious assault on our democracy” to which he referred.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 15 of 32

     

    16

    57. The call to arms by Defendant Trump had its intended effect. Immediately after

    his incendiary remarks, the crowd began shouting and chanting, “Storm the Capitol,” “Invade the

    Capitol Building,” and “Take the Capitol right now.”

    58. Rather than discourage the riotous action that was advocated, Defendant Trump

    reinforced it by stating: “The radical left knows exactly what they’re doing. They’re ruthless and

    it’s time that somebody did something about it.”

    59. Defendant Trump then roused the crowd further, shouting: “Something is wrong

    here, something is really wrong, can’t have happened and we fight, we fight like hell, and if you

    don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”

    60. At this point, the crowd began chanting “Fight like Hell” and “Fight for Trump.”

    61. Then, Defendant Trump directed the crowd to descend upon the Capitol: “So we

    are going to … walk down Pennsylvania Avenue …, and we are going to the Capitol, and we are

    going to try and give … our Republicans, the weak ones because the strong ones don’t need any

    of our help, we’re … going to try and give them the kind of pride and boldness that they need to

    take back our country. So, let’s walk down Pennsylvania Avenue.”

    62. The permit obtained for the Save America rally expressly provided: “This permit

    does not authorize a march from the Ellipse.” Defendant Trump nevertheless instructed the

    angry crowd to march from the Ellipse to the Capitol for the purpose of “fight[ing] like hell,” and

    therefore directed the crowd to take action outside the bounds of what the permit authorized.

    III. The Insurrection at the Capitol

    63. The U.S. Capitol, which is located at First Street, SE, in Washington, D.C., is

    secured 24 hours a day by U.S. Capitol Police. Restrictions around the U.S. Capitol include

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 16 of 32

     

    17

    permanent and temporary security barriers and posts manned by U.S. Capitol Police. Only

    authorized people with appropriate identification were allowed access inside the U.S. Capitol.

    64. On January 6, 2021, the exterior plaza of the U.S. Capitol was closed to members

    of the public. Metal barriers were placed along pedestrian entrances approximately one hundred

    feet from the west side entrance to the Capitol.

    65. On January 6, 2021, at approximately 1:00 PM, in accordance with the

    Constitution and federal law dictating the means by which Congress counts the states’ Electoral

    Votes, including the date and time such counting shall occur, a joint session of the United Sates

    Congress convened at the United States Capitol to certify the vote count of the 2020 presidential

    election.

    66. Defendant Proud Boys was a key instigator of the insurrection at the Capitol,

    working in concert with Defendants Trump and Giuliani as they incited and directed an angry

    mob to descend on the Capitol.

    67. At approximately 12:50 PM on January 6, 2021, Defendant Proud Boys, rallied

    by leader Joseph Biggs, coalesced and marched towards the Capitol while Trump was speaking

    at the Save America rally.

    68. En route to the Capitol, members of Defendant Proud Boys were engaged in

    various chants and response calls, including “Fuck Antifa!” and “Whose streets? Our streets!”

    69. At the direction of the Defendant Proud Boys rally organizers, many Proud Boys

    members abandoned their organization’s colors of black and yellow in order to wear the black

    attire associated with Antifa.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 17 of 32

     

    18

    70. Captured on video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n0MA5GjR6Zo, at

    approximately 12:52 PM, Defendant Proud Boys head Biggs dispatched the leader of the assault

    on the Capitol entrance.

    71. Following this lead, more members of Defendant Proud Boys descended on the

    Capitol, breaking through the metal barriers erected a hundred feet from the Capitol building and

    overcoming the Capitol Police officers stationed there to repel any incursion on the Capitol.

    72. Following the lead of the Defendant Proud Boys, who overcame the barriers

    erected to protect the Capitol, the crowd dispatched by Defendant Trump descended on the

    Capitol.

    73. By the time the thousands of demonstrators arrived at the Capitol, the Proud Boys

    had already begun compromising the protections erected by the Capitol Police near the base of

    the Capitol.

    74. As a result, the crowd that arrived passed easily through the outer ring of barriers

    and was able to confront and ultimately overwhelm an inner array of Capitol Police and

    barricades established as the last line of defense outside the Capitol building.

    75. Having delayed delivering his incendiary remarks to the crowd at the Ellipse in

    order to afford the Defendant Proud Boys an opportunity to arrive at the Capitol and overcome

    its initial defenses, Defendant Trump acted in concert with the Proud Boys, allowing them to

    clear the way for the arriving riotous crowd to descend on, and ultimately enter, the Capitol.

    76. The crowd that Defendants Trump and Giuliani incited to march upon and

    forcibly enter the Capitol erected gallows on the Capitol grounds and displayed a noose.

    77. Members of the crowd, whom Defendants Trump and Giuliani incited to forcibly

    enter the Capitol, proceeded as Defendants Trump and Giuliani directed them to interrupt the

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 18 of 32

     

    19

    count of the Electoral College ballots with the purpose of precluding the final certification of the

    election results required by law.

    78. At the time the rioters initially broke into the Capitol, members of the House of

    Representatives and the Senate were engaged in debating the tally of the votes cast by members

    of the Electoral College.

    79. Defendant Trump was watching live televised reports of the forcible entry into the

    Capitol and the violence committed by the crowd dispatched by Defendants Trump and Giuliani.

    Rather than take action to attempt to calm the riotous crowd or direct additional law enforcement

    to the site, Defendant Trump egged on members of the riotous crowd by tweeting at 1:49 PM a

    video of the “Save America” rally filmed shortly before, where he had rallied the crowd with his

    clarion call: “Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that’s what this is all

    about . . . You’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and

    you have to be strong.”

    80. Shortly after 2:00 PM, the riotous crowd breached the Capitol Building.

    Windows and barricades were broken as the mob stormed into the National Statuary Hall, the

    heart of the Capitol building.

    81. Video recorded a member of Defendant Proud Boys as he broke through a Capitol

    window at approximately 2:11 PM, using the clear-plastic shield seized from an overcome

    Capitol Police Officer. Thereafter, members of the crowd, including some from the Defendant

    Proud Boys, entered the Capitol through the broken window and then opened a door, through

    which the riotous crowd streamed into the Capitol.

    82. The member of Defendant Proud Boys who broke through the window with a

    plastic shield then posted a self-congratulatory video of himself smoking a cigar in celebration of

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 19 of 32

     

    20

    his unlawful entry, declaring: “Victory smoke in the Capitol, boys … I knew we could take this

    shit over if we tried hard enough.”

    83. Other video live streamed to the social media site Parler captured Defendant

    Proud Boys leader Joseph Biggs, who had entered the Capitol, responding to an inquiry asking,

    “Hey Biggs, what do you gotta say” by smiling and pronouncing, “This is awesome!”

    84. Shortly after the Capitol was breached, the Senate was called into recess.

    85. Chaos and violence reigned as riotous members of the crowd inflamed by remarks

    from Defendants Trump and Giuliani streamed into the Capitol, overcoming most of the

    remaining Capitol Police and descending upon Capitol offices of Members of Congress and their

    staff. Rioters beat on the doors of the chamber of the House of Representatives where Defendant

    Thompson and other members of the House were forced to shelter in place.

    86. Employing ear pieces and walkie-talkies in order to communicate with each other

    and coordinate their attack on the Capitol, members of Defendant Proud Boys inside the Capitol

    Building continued to lead and coordinate facets of the attack on the Capitol in order to interfere

    with the tally of Electoral College votes in which members of Congress were engaged.

    87. Yet another video depicted a member of Defendant Proud Boys inside the Capitol

    saying, “We just went ahead and stormed the Capitol. It’s about to get ugly.” He was

    surrounded by riotous supporters who chanted “Our house” and were accompanied by another

    member of Defendant Proud Boys who sarcastically called for “Nancy,” to summon the Speaker

    of the House of the United States House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi.

    88. Thereafter, members of Defendant Proud Boys and members of the riotous crowd

    whose invasion of the Capitol was incited by Defendants Trump and Giuliani roamed the

    Capitol, entering and rifling through Member offices, including the office of House Speaker

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 20 of 32

     

    21

    Nancy Pelosi, leaving furniture and files in disarray and removing personal and official effects

    including laptops containing confidential information. As they roamed the Capitol Building,

    members of Defendant Proud Boys and members of the riotous crowd chanted, “Fight for

    Trump.”

    89. Members of Defendant Proud Boys as well as members of the riotous crowd also

    searched for Members of Congress in the halls and rooms of the Capitol. Several rioters

    carried plastic handcuffs that would have permitted them to detain Members of Congress whom

    they encountered.

    90. Notwithstanding that Republican Members of Congress trapped in the Capitol

    transmitted appeals to the White House to take immediate action to stop the insurrection, no

    action was forthcoming as the President continued to watch the insurrection unfold in live

    televised reports.

    91. Soon after members of the riotous crowd dispatched by Defendants Trump and

    Giuliani forcibly entered the Capitol and began roaming its halls and offices, Defendant Trump

    called upon them to disrupt the Electoral College ballot count, tweeting that “Mike Pence didn’t

    have the courage to do what should have been done …”

    92. When the Capitol was breached around 2:11 PM, then Vice President Pence was

    present at the Capitol in his capacity as President of the Senate, in order to preside over the tally

    of the Electoral College ballots.

    93. Having declined to suspend the Electoral College vote tally as Defendant Trump

    urged him to do, then Vice President Pence also became a target of the crowd’s ire, along with

    Members of Congress, as rioters chanted “Hang Mike Pence.”

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 21 of 32

     

    22

    94. Once inside the Capitol, some members of the riotous crowd confirmed they were

    acting upon the direction and at the behest of Defendant Trump. When the crowd confronted

    Capitol Police inside the Capitol, they warned the Capitol Police officers, “You’re outnumbered.

    There’s a fucking million of us out there. And we are listening to Trump – your boss.”

    Apparently believing that Defendant Trump’s inciteful remarks gave them license to enter and

    overtake the Capitol, leaders of the riotous crowd also told Capitol Police, “We were invited here

    by the President of the United States.” Rioters parading through the halls of the Capitol carried

    flags and wore clothing and other paraphernalia bearing the name: “Trump.”

    95. As House Republican Conference Chair the Honorable Elizabeth L. Cheney

    stated in her vote in favor of the Article of Impeachment on January 12, 2021, Defendant Trump

    “summoned this mob, assembled the mob, and lit the flame of this attack. Everything that

    followed was his doing.”

    96. Then Senate Majority Leader Senator Mitch McConnell likewise observed in

    remarks delivered on the Senate floor on January 19, 2021 the pivotal role of Defendant Trump

    in inciting the attack on the Capitol, stating, “The mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the

    President and other powerful people and they tried to use fear and violence to stop a specific

    proceeding of the first branch of the federal government which they did not like.”

    97. Acting in concert with Defendant Proud Boys and the rest of the riotous mob

    entering the Capitol, members of Defendant Oath Keepers wore paramilitary equipment,

    helmets, reinforced vests and clothing with Oath Keepers paraphernalia, moving in a regimented

    manner as members of the military are trained. Pursuing a purpose shared by Defendants Trump

    and Giuliani as well as Defendant Proud Boys, Defendant Oath Keepers played a leadership role

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 22 of 32

     

    23

    of the riotous crowd and provided military-style assistance sufficient to overcome any Capitol

    Police resistance.

    98. Members of Defendant Oath Keepers were equally clear that the purpose of their

    unlawful presence at the Capitol was to interfere with the tally of Electoral College votes. One

    member of Defendant Oath Keepers, for example, posted a photograph of herself at the Capitol

    on the social media site Parler, along with the statement: “Me before forcing entry into the

    Capitol Building. #stopthesteal #stormthecapitol #oathkeepers #ohiomilitia.” Another post late

    in the day declared: “Yeah. We stormed the Capitol today. Teargassed, the whole, 9. Pushed

    our way into the Rotunda. Made it into the Senate even. The news is lying (even Fox) about the

    Historical Events we created today.”

    99. Like Defendant Proud Boys, members of Defendant Oath Keepers communicated

    with portable devices that permitted them to coordinate their activities in the Capitol. A message

    later posted on Facebook for example revealed Defendant Oath Keepers was transmitting

    intelligence about the location of Members of Congress whom they were hunting. It said: “All

    members are in the tunnels under capital seal them in. Turn on gas.” Another message

    transmitted to Defendant Oath Keepers leader Thomas Caldwell during the attack reported:

    “Tom, all legislators are down in the Tunnels 3 floors down,” and “Go through back house

    chamber doors facing N left down hallway down steps.” Still another message among members

    of Defendant Oath Keepers revealed the organized manner in which they pursued their mission:

    "We have a good group. We have about 30-40 of us. We are sticking together and sticking to

    the plan.”

    100. Reflecting on their success in interfering with the tally of the Electoral College

    votes, Defendant Oath Keepers leader Thomas Caldwell posted a message on Facebook at

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 23 of 32

     

    24

    approximately 7:49 PM on the same day with a video of himself inside the Capitol and the

    message: “Us storming the castle. Please share. Sharon was with me. I am such an instigator!

    She was ready for it man! Didn’t even mind the tear gas.”

    101. Gloating over their perceived success, Caldwell then sent another message

    reporting: “Proud boys scuffled with cops and drove them inside to hide. Breached the doors.

    One guy made it all the way to the house floor, another to Pelosi’s office. A good time.”

    102. Viewing their success in disrupting the Congress as a model for similar actions in

    the future, Caldwell sent another message stating: “We need to do this at the local level. Let’s

    storm the capitol in Ohio. Tell me when!”

    103. Members of the riotous crowd prominently displayed a Confederate flag within

    the walls of the Capitol. Widely viewed as a symbol of the subjugation of African Americans as

    slaves by the dominant white slave holders as well as a powerful reminder of the insurrection

    caused by the secession of the southern states before the Civil War, members of the riotous

    crowd carried the Confederate Flag as a banner reflecting much of the sentiment motivating

    many who invaded the Capitol.

    104. Outside the Capitol, rioters attacked Capitol Police officers, yelling “traitors” at

    those law enforcement officers who were trying to protect the Capitol and the members of the

    House of Representatives and Senate.

    105. Rioters doused law enforcement officers with bear mace, a concentrated pepper

    spray designed to deter bear attacks, i.e., not intended to be deployed against humans.

    106. Capitol Police Officers were dragged and kicked.

    107. At least one officer was beaten with the pole attached to an American flag.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 24 of 32

     

    25

    108. While the rioting crowd was forcibly entering the Capitol, roaming its halls and

    desecrating its offices, that same day Defendant Giuliani joined the other Defendants in seeking

    to delay and derail the tally of the Electoral College ballots by calling Members of Congress,

    urging them to do everything they could to “slow it down” and “delay” the Electoral College

    vote count in Congress.

    109. In these phone call communications with selected Members of Congress while the

    insurrection was ongoing on January 6, Defendant Giuliani urged: “And I know they’re

    reconvening at eight tonight, but the only strategy we can follow is to object to numerous states

    and raise issues so that we get ourselves into tomorrow ideally until the end of tomorrow.”

    110. At 6:01 PM, Defendant Trump expressed the view that the insurrection attempted

    by the rioting crowd dispatched by Trump and Giuliani and the accompanying violence at the

    Capitol were justified and to be expected, tweeting: “These are the things and events that happen

    when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from

    great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in

    peace. Remember this day forever!” This again was a complete and utter lie by Trump trying to

    tell the American people that he won a landslide election victory which was being stripped away.

    111. The final announcement by Vice President Mike Pence of the count of the

    Electoral College votes, which provided the imprimatur of Congress on the results of the

    presidential election held in 2020, did not occur until 3:41 AM the next morning, January 7,

    2021.

    112. Five people died during the course of the riot and/or as a result of injuries

    sustained during the riot. Those casualties included one member of law enforcement.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 25 of 32

     

    26

    113. Fights between rioters and officers of the Capitol Police resulted in the

    hospitalization of more than 50 officers.

    114. Faced with the threat of criminal prosecution, many of the rioting crowd members

    justified their presence and their actions as occurring because Defendants Trump and/or Giuliani

    instructed them to proceed in this unruly and disruptive manner, and that these individuals were

    following orders from their then-President and his attorney.

    IV. Plaintiff, the Honorable Bennie Thompson

    115. When the attack on the Capitol began, Plaintiff Thompson was seated in Gallery

    C of the House of Representatives, prepared to discharge his duties to supervise and eventually

    vote on approval of the count of the Electoral College ballots.

    116. Plaintiff Thompson was present when the proceeding began at 1:00 PM, as

    required by the Electoral Count Act of 1887.

    117. Between approximately 2:15 and 2:20 PM, soon after rioters had breached the

    Capitol Building, the House was called into recess.

    118. Plaintiff Thompson heard rioters pounding on the door of the House chamber and

    saw security guards move furniture to blockade the door. He then heard the rioters trying to

    break into the chamber refer to Speaker Pelosi as a “bitch,” saying they wanted to get their hands

    on her and refer to Vice President Pence as having betrayed President Trump.

    119. Plaintiff Thompson witnessed security personnel draw their firearms to protect

    Plaintiff Thompson and other Members of Congress, who were there to perform their legally

    required duties, from the violent rioters who were attempting to disrupt, and ultimately did

    disrupt, this important function of Congress.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 26 of 32

     

    27

    120. Through the blocked doors, Plaintiff Thompson heard threats of physical violence

    against any Member who attempted to proceed to approve the Electoral College ballot count.

    121. Plaintiff Thompson heard a gunshot, the source of which, at the time, was

    unknown to him, although he later learned that it had killed one of the rioters who had forced her

    way into the Capitol lobby.

    122. Capitol security instructed Plaintiff Thompson and the other lawmakers to lie on

    the floor, don gas masks that were stored under seats in the gallery, and to move to the other side

    of the gallery. After an extended period of time had elapsed, during which Plaintiff Thompson

    and his colleagues were unable to move or leave the gallery because the rioters posed a

    continuing threat to their safety, Capitol security led Plaintiff Thompson and the other lawmakers

    through a tunnel out of the Capitol to the Longworth House Office Building, where they were

    directed to shelter in a room with 200-300 other lawmakers, staff members, and family members.

    123. During this period, Plaintiff Thompson received telephone calls from his wife

    who reported what she saw on the televised reports of violence at the Capitol. Plaintiff

    Thompson ultimately moved to a different room in the Longworth Building, and at about 6:00

    P.M. was moved to a secure location in the Capitol.

    124. Plaintiff Thompson personally witnessed rioters who had gotten far into the

    building and were lying face down on the floor and restrained after being arrested by security.

    125. All these events took place during a worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. Plaintiff

    Thompson was 72 years old at the time and therefore within the age group for which the virus

    posed the greatest risk to his health.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 27 of 32

     

    28

    126. By being required to shelter in place, Plaintiff Thompson and other Members of

    Congress were forced to occupy space that did not allow for the social distancing measures that

    minimized the risk of transmission of the virus.

    127. Shortly after the siege on the Capitol ended, at least two other Members of

    Congress who shared the confined space with Plaintiff Thompson tested positive for COVID-19.

    128. Until the proceedings with the count of the Electoral College ballots resumed at

    approximately 8:00 PM, Plaintiff Thompson and other Members were barred from leaving the

    Capitol Building because their safety remained at risk from rioting crowd members who were

    still present.

    129. During this entire time, Plaintiff Thompson reasonably feared for his physical

    safety. While trapped in the building, during the siege by the rioters that Defendants unleashed

    on the Capitol, Plaintiff Thompson feared for his life and worried that he might never see his

    family again.

    130. On January 13, 2021, an Article of Impeachment was passed by a bipartisan

    majority of the House of Representatives, citing Defendant Trump for inciting the violence

    perpetrated at the Capitol. The Article of Impeachment provides, in part:

    On January 6, 2021, pursuant to the 12th Amendment to the

    Constitution of the United States, the Vice President of the United

    States, the House of Representatives, and the Senate met at the

    United States Capitol for a Joint Session of Congress to count the

    votes of the Electoral College. In the months preceding the Joint

    Session, President Trump repeatedly issued false statements

    asserting that the Presidential election results were the product of

    widespread fraud and should not be accepted by the American

    people or certified by State or Federal officials. Shortly before the

    Joint Session commenced, President Trump, addressed a crowd at

    the Ellipse in Washington, D.C. There, he reiterated false claims

    that “we won this election, and we won it by a landslide.” He also

    willfully made statements that, in context, encouraged — and

    foreseeably resulted in — lawless action at the Capitol, such as: “if

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 28 of 32

     

    29

    you don’t fight like hell you're not going to have a country

    anymore.” Thus incited by President Trump, members of the

    crowd he had addressed, in an attempt to, among other objectives,

    interfere with the Joint Session's solemn constitutional duty to

    certify the results of the 2020 Presidential election, unlawfully

    breached and vandalized the Capitol, injured and killed law

    enforcement personnel, menaced Members of Congress, the Vice

    President, and Congressional personnel, and engaged in other

    violent, deadly, destructive and seditious acts.

    131. At the conclusion of President Trump’s impeachment trial, the Senate voted to

    acquit Defendant Trump, finding Defendant Trump not guilty of inciting the deadly riot at the

    Capitol by a vote of 57 to 43.

    132. Minutes after voting to acquit Defendant Trump, Senate Minority Leader Mitch

    McConnell gave a speech on the floor of the Senate. Senator McConnell began by

    acknowledging Defendant Trump’s culpability: “There is no question that President Trump is

    practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of that day. The people who

    stormed this building believed they were acting on the wishes and instructions of their president.

    And their having that belief was a foreseeable consequence of the growing crescendo of false

    statements, conspiracy theories, and reckless hyperbole which the defeated President kept

    shouting into the largest megaphone on planet Earth.” However, like the other Senators who

    voted to acquit Defendant Trump, Senator McConnell did not believe that the impeachment

    process was constitutional. Senator McConnell went on to state that “President Trump is still

    liable for everything he did while he was in office, as an ordinary citizen, unless the statute of

    limitations has run, still liable for everything he did while in office, didn't get away with

    anything yet – yet. We have a criminal justice system in this country. We have civil litigation.

    And former presidents are not immune from being held accountable by either one.”

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 29 of 32

     

    30

    CAUSE OF ACTION

    Violation of the Ku Klux Klan Act

    133. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference the allegations contained in all

    preceding paragraphs.

    134. Under the Ku Klux Klan Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1985(1), Defendants may not “conspire

    to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person … holding any office, trust, or place of

    confidence under the United States … from discharging any duties thereof; or to induce by like

    means any officer of the United States to leave any … place[] where his duties as an officer are

    required to be performed, or … to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his

    official duties.”

    135. Defendants Trump, Giuliani, Proud Boys, and Oath Keepers plotted, coordinated,

    and executed a common plan to prevent Congress from discharging its official duties in

    certifying the results of the presidential election.

    136. In furtherance of this conspiracy, Defendants Trump and Giuliani engaged in a

    concerted campaign to misinform their supporters and the public, encouraging and promoting

    intimidation and violence in furtherance of their common plan to promote the re-election of

    Defendant Trump, even after the states had certified election results decisively showing he lost

    the election, and to disrupt the legally required process before Congress to supervise the counting

    of the Electoral College ballots and certify the results of that count.

    137. As a result, Defendant Trump acted beyond the outer perimeter of his official

    duties and therefore is susceptible to suit in his personal capacity.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 30 of 32

     

    31

    138. The activities alleged above were undertaken by all Defendants as co-conspirators

    for the purpose of seeking to prevent Plaintiff Thompson and other members of Congress from

    certifying that former Vice President Biden won the presidential election.

    139. As a result of the acts set out in the above paragraphs committed in furtherance of

    this conspiracy, Plaintiff Thompson was hindered and impeded in the discharge of his official

    duties and suffered the deprivation of his right to be free from intimidation and threats in the

    discharge of his official duties, as explicitly protected under Ku Klux Klan Act. During the time

    when the Capitol was under attack, Plaintiff Thompson suffered emotional distress.

    140. As a result, Plaintiff Thompson seeks an award of compensatory damages.

    141. As the unlawful actions taken by the Defendants were malicious and in reckless

    disregard of federally protected rights, Plaintiff Thompson seeks an award of punitive damages

    to punish the Defendants for engaging in a concerted and continuing course of unlawful conduct

    and to deter the Defendants and others from engaging in similar unlawful conduct in the future.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    Wherefore, Plaintiff respectfully requests an award of the following relief:

    A. A declaratory judgment that the actions described herein constitute a violation of

    42 U.S.C. § 1985(1);

    B. Injunctive relief enjoining Defendants from engaging in future violations of 42

    U.S.C. § 1985(1);

    C. Compensatory in an amount to be determined at trial;

    D. Punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial;

    E. An award of costs and reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988;

    F. Such other relief as the Court deems necessary and just.

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 31 of 32

     

    32

    Dated: February 16, 2021

    Respectfully submitted,

    /s/ Janette Louard

    Janette Louard (pro hac vice motion to be

    filed)

    Anthony P. Ashton, Bar No. MD0096

    NAACP

    Office of General Counsel

    4805 Mount Hope Drive

    Baltimore, MD 21215

    Telephone: (410) 580-5777

    jlouard@naacpnet.org

    aashton@naacpnet.org

    /s/ Joseph M. Sellers

    Joseph M. Sellers, Bar No. 318410

    Brian Corman, Bar No. 1008635

    Alison S. Deich, Bar No. 1572878 (application

    for admission to be filed)

    COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC

    1100 New York Avenue, N.W. Suite 500, East

    Tower Washington, DC 20005

    Telephone: (202) 408-4600

    Facsimile: (202) 408-4699

    jsellers@cohenmilstein.com

    bcorman@cohenmilstein.com

    adeich@cohenmilstein.com

    Case 1:21-cv-00400 Document 1 Filed 02/16/21 Page 32 of 32

     

     

     

    1. Douglas Keith III
    2. Comment history

      1. Douglas Keith III posted on Trump, Giuliani sued in federal court over role in Capitol riot | CBC News:

        "Oh come on. Both sides are guilty of rhetoric. If you don't charge the people in this video of incit..."

    3. Douglas Keith III posted on Trump, Giuliani sued in federal court over role in Capitol riot | CBC News:

      "Reply to @John Douglas: Are your legs sore?"

    4. Douglas Keith III posted on Trump, Giuliani sued in federal court over role in Capitol riot | CBC News:

      "Reply to @John Douglas:"

    5. Douglas Keith III posted on Trump, Giuliani sued in federal court over role in Capitol riot | CBC News:

      "Reply to @Richard Hertz: I could care less about each side. I want equality and justice. Don't you..."

    6. Douglas Keith III posted on Trump, Giuliani sued in federal court over role in Capitol riot | CBC News:

      "Reply to @George Kay: You must miss a lot. The clip is on CBC."

    Official languages commissioner prefers a public review of N.B's language law

    $
    0
    0

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/official-languages-review-prefers-open-review-1.5915692

     

    Official languages commissioner prefers a public review of N.B's language law

    Shirley MacLean says she had no say on decision to hold review behind closed doors

     

    Jacques Poitras· CBC News· Posted: Feb 16, 2021 3:00 PM AT

     


    Shirley MacLean, the New Brunswick commissioner of official languages, says that in order to have a full discussion of the Official Languages Act, the hearings should happen in public. (Radio-Canada)

    New Brunswick's official languages commissioner says she'd prefer to see a review of the province's language law unfold in public, and without other issues such as education being part of the discussion.

    Shirley MacLean told a committee of MLAs on Tuesday that she wasn't consulted on the review process and had no control over what the Higgs government chose to do. 

    But she said she would have preferred to see at least part of the consultation take place in public view. 

    "I think the public today expects that things happen transparently," said MacLean, who is in her first year in the job of commissioner. "For a full discussion it should be a public discussion.

    "Maybe part of it can be public, part of it not … but a full discussion, in my view, would take place in public."

    Premier Blaine Higgs announced in early January that he would choose two commissioners to conduct a 10-year review of the Official Languages Act, a process that is required by the law itself.

    Premier Blaine Higgs added a discussion around why anglophone schools don't graduate more bilingual students to the Official Languages Act review. (CBC)

    Despite calls for a public process from organizations ranging from the Acadian Society of New Brunswick to the People's Alliance, Higgs said consultations would happen behind closed doors. 

    He said that would allow "an open conversation where everybody is able to participate without any external pressure of any kind."

    Higgs has also asked the commissioners to examine why more graduates of anglophone schools in the province aren't fluent in French, even though that is not an issue covered by the language law.

    The province's dual school systems, one English and one French, do not have the obligation to provide bilingual service and operate outside the reach of the Official Languages Act. 

    Critics say adding education issues to the review will take away from the ability to focus on the act itself.

    Liberal MLA Isabelle Theriault says the broadened mandate to look at the French immersion program dilutes the review process. (Twitter.com)

    "When the mandate broadens like that, everything's diluted," Caraquet Liberal MLA Isabelle Thériault said Tuesday.

    MacLean agreed.

    "I would have preferred that the review would have happened without a discussion about education," she said.

    "They are two completely different things because the Official Languages Act does not touch on education."

    But she acknowledged she has no say on the process, and her input will be limited to making submissions to the commissioners. 

    "He wants a discussion on education and bilingualism," she said. "That's his choice at the end of the day." 

    In her annual report released in December, MacLean recommended the province amend the Official Languages Act to clarify the obligations of police departments to comply and to give public servants the right to work in the official language of their choice.

    She also recommended changes to give the province a 30-day time limit to respond to her investigations and to give her office the power to sign enforcement agreements with government institutions that violate the act regularly. 

     

    About the Author

    Jacques Poitras

    Provincial Affairs reporter

    Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit. 

     

     

     

    78 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story.

     

     

    David Amos
    Deja Vu Anyone??? 
     
    First anglophone to be named languages commissioner hopes her example will inspire
    Shirley MacLean is originally from Cape Breton but has lived here for more than 30 years
    Elizabeth Fraser · CBC News · Posted: Nov 25, 2019 11:14 AM AT
     
     
     
     

    David Amos
    Methinks Higgy et al should say Hey to Shirley MacLean for me N'esy Pas? 
     
     
     
     
     
     

    David Amos
    Content deactivated
    "Green party Leader David Coon says a public review of the legislation should be conducted by a legislative committee, not by commissioners appointed by the premier."

    Yea Right

    Methinks everybody knows I have had the low down of Shirley MacLean and all her lawyer pals since 2004 Hence we all know she will play along to get along in her new post. Thats why she and NB's latest Integrity Commissioner were appointed. Yet Higgy wants to appoint to more Commissioners to work in secret and even the Greens pretend to be confused N'esy Pas?


    David Amos
    Oh My My 
     
     
    PHIL INNIS  
    Reply to @David Amos: SURPRISE SURPRISE THE KING IS BACK!!!!
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Lou Bell
    Let's face it , the SANB Liberals have made " official languages " actually " official culture " . What was deemed " service in language of choice " has been manipulated into controlling culture . We certainly do need to have a talk in this province because the province really isn't just a "bilingual province as advertised , but a province where culture is manipulated to suit the preference of those in charge . The cultural manipulation we see is completely different than bilingualism . The " Phonie Games " had nothing to do with bilingualism , it had more to do with cowtowing to a distinct group of people . That's why the plans were never revealed . It was nefarious planning to keep their plans from the majority of NBers ! And when caught ? No apologies , nothing .
     
     

    David Amos
    Reply to @Lou Bell: Go Figure why CBC blocks me
     
     
    Jos Allaire
    Reply to @Lou DumBell: You are the type of folks that the CORservatives attract.
     
     
     
     
     
     
    PHIL INNIS
    *grabs popcorn*  


     

    Monday, 25 November 2019

    First anglophone to be named languages commissioner hopes her example will inspire

    https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies



     
    Replying to and  49 others
    Methinks Shirley MacLean, the deputy executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society should review my file before she takes her new position N'esy Pas?
     




    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/shirley-maclean-new-brunswick-language-commissioner-1.5371960



    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
    Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 04:17:56 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks nearly anyone is capable of Googling the following
    two names N'esy Pas? David Raymond Amos Shirley MacLean
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Merci encore pour votre courriel.

    First anglophone to be named languages commissioner hopes her example will inspire

    Shirley MacLean is originally from Cape Breton but has lived here for more than 30 years



    Elizabeth Fraser· CBC News· Posted: Nov 25, 2019 11:14 AM AT




    Shirley MacLean, the deputy executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society, has been selected as the province's next commissioner of official languages. (Shane Magee/CBC)

    Shirley MacLean has something to prove.

    On Friday, she was named the province's commissioner of official languages and will be the first anglophone to hold the position since it was created in 2003.

    "I'm very much hoping that my positive experience in learning a second language, certainly as an adult as well, will serve to promote the advancement of both official languages in New Brunswick," MacLean said Monday.


    She said she knows the French language and has a good understanding of French culture, but she also knows she has to win the hearts of francophones.

    "There's always work to be done."

    Bringing 2 languages together


    MacLean, who called herself a proponent of education about other cultures, said she hopes to give New Brunswickers a greater desire to learn the value of both official languages.

    "I'm actually pretty proud to have been chosen," she told Information Morning Fredericton.

    MacLean will come to the commissioner's job from the New Brunswick Law Society, where she has been deputy executive director. She will replace the acting languages commissioner, Michel Carrier.

    She is originally from Baddeck, N.S., but has lived in New Brunswick for more than 30 years.

    In her 20s, MacLean took immersion in Quebec where she became bilingual. Then she applied to law school at the University of New Brunswick. After getting her law degree, she decided to stay on and work in the province.

    "New Brunswick was a bilingual province and the only way I was going to keep my second language, was if I stayed here and worked and lived and breathed both official languages."

    What's the job?

    The official languages commissioner is mandated to investigate complaints under the Official Languages Act, to report on and make recommendations on compliance with the act, and to promote the advancement of both official languages in the province.
    The commissioner reports to the legislature and makes an annual report.

    In 2016, almost 34 per cent of New Brunswickers were bilingual, according to Statistics Canada.

    More than 72 per cent of New Brunswickers whose mother tongue is French are bilingual, compared with 15.4 per cent of New Brunswickers whose first language is English.


    The Higgs government has named Shirley MacLean, the current deputy executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society, as the province's next commissioner of official languages. 0:36

    The former permanent commissioner, Katherine d'Entremont, retired in July 2018 after five years in the position.

    MacLean will start the new job in January.

    With files from Information Morning Fredericton


    About the Author


    Elizabeth Fraser
    Reporter/Editor
    Elizabeth Fraser is a reporter/editor with CBC New Brunswick based in Fredericton. She's originally from Manitoba. Story tip? elizabeth.fraser@cbc.ca




    129 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story.




    David Amos
    Methinks Shirley MacLean, the deputy executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society should review my file before she takes her new position N'esy Pas?


    Al Clark
    Reply to @David Amos: neigh. paws. 
     

    Lewis Taylor
    Reply to @David Amos:
    Why would she waste her time on you? more important things to do. just post and be happy. 



    David Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Methinks even you are capable of Googling the following two names N'esy Pas? David Raymond Amos Shirley MacLean 
     

    David Amos
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Methinks some folks may enjoy Googling the following two names N'esy Pas?

    David Raymond Amos Shirley MacLean 



    David Amos
    Content disabled 
    Reply to @David Amos: BINGO












    Brian Robertson
    If there was ever an incentive for Maritime union, it would be to undo Frank McKenna's betrayal of New Brunswick.


    Al Clark 
    Reply to @Brian Robertson: "Frank McKenna's betrayal of New Brunswick" Oh, please elaborate ;-)


    Brian Robertson 
    Reply to @Al Clark:
    His backroom deal with Mulroney to slip Bill 88 into the Constitution, despite Meech Lake crashing and burning.
    That preposal would NEVER have passed on its own.



    Shawn McShane 
    Reply to @Al Clark: Call centers and minimum wages while on the back end foreign workers beneath the radar.


    Al Clark 
    Reply to @Brian Robertson: Mulroney? The Con? Post 87? Have you heard of the guy that was in there for 17 years before frankie?


    Al Clark 
    Reply to @Shawn McShane: I think you fergot clearcuts and roundup?


    David Amos
    Reply to @Brian Robertson: BINGO


    David Amos
    Reply to @Al Clark: Methinks you know I forget nothing as you SANB dudes try hard to forget Federal Court File No T-1557-15 N'esy Pas? 
     

    David Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Al Clark: Methinks if you SANB dudes read anything then you would know what Frank McKenna, his former partner Justice Richard Bell and legions of lawyers throughout Canada and the USA know. The fact is that Shirley MacLean answered my complaint against a liberal/Yankee lawyer in 2004 and that I filed her answer in the public record of a Yankee Court ASAP and the Federal Court of Canada several years ago N'esy Pas?


    David Amos 
    Reply to @David Amos: Too late already emailed and blogged












    Troy Murray
    I thought anglophone was English only. Would she be not termed bilingual, or English first language bilingual.


    David Amos  
    Reply to @Troy Murray: Who cares? 
     

    David Amos 
    Reply to @Troy Murray: FYI I mean no offense but If you could see what I see then you would understand my indignation


    Troy Murray
    Reply to @David Amos: I don’t like the fact our tax supported messenger tries to cause more division and strife. Picture yourself as a francophone seeing the headline thinking the worst case scenario. Halfway through the article it says she is bilingual. Don’t worry, no offence taken, thanks
     
     
    David Amos  
    Reply to @Troy Murray: "I don’t like the fact our tax supported messenger tries to cause more division and strife"

    Me Too














    Shawn McShane
    Moncton is losing the French Embassy, the Francophone is in active mode to bring in Francophone speakers, our last Language Commissioner championed Francophone"s from French Speaking Africa. The Embassy should be African, from the former French colonies of Africa.


    Shawn McShane
    Reply to @Shawn McShane: Get your vaccine! It will become the law.


    David Amos 
    Reply to @Shawn McShane: As I said they can cry me a river about the French leaving Moncton














    Linda Christie Hazlett
    I think she is a good choice and restores to a degree, a sense of fairness


    David Amos  
    Reply to @Linda Christie Hazlett: Dream on












    Marc Martin
    PANB and ERNB wont be able to use the French comissionnaire excuse anymore....


    Al Clark 
    Reply to @Marc Martin: Commissioner and commissionaire are not interchangeable. She is the official languageS commissioner.
    A member of the corps of commissionaires was the front line of contact for the public in a provincial government building (now the blaine higgs memorial eyesore - looks GREAT btw higgy) and couldn't speak both official languages. He knew he shouldn't be there and, more importantly, HIS BOSS did too. It will live forever in COR mythology.
     
     
    David Amos   
    Reply to @Marc Martin: Methinks you two SANB dudes are Too Too Funny Indeed I bet you laugh at your own nonsense as much as Higgy does N'esy Pas?














    Larry Larson
    Hopefully this one doesn't email phony complaints to herself because she wasn't getting any complaints!


    Marc Martin 
    Reply to @Larry Larson: So no English has ever complained? So why this language debate then?

    Larry Larson
    Reply to @Marc Martin: What about? What about? So you have no problem with the previous commissioner having to fake complaints?
     

    Marc Martin
    Reply to @Larry Larson: What are these fake complaints?

    Jason Inness 
    Reply to @Marc Martin: How about the one that got the guy fired in Fredericton? She put the complaint in, "investigated" the complaint, ruled on the complaint, then wouldn't admit that she was the one who put in the complaint.
    This position is crap and should be eliminated. The only reason they have an "Anglophone" person is because people are getting tired of this BS.
     

    Marc Martin 
    Reply to @Jason Inness: It was her job to investigate. The job was front service and required bilingual service, educated yourself its part of her mandate...Any other ? You wont find anything else but the reason she was French.


    Maggie Leard 
    Reply to @Marc Martin: new brunswick government should be passing language laws that test the english language at a cradle level....no person who speaks any type of french will be hired by government unless they speak the Queens english!
    french language was never a historic language for new brunswick.....the loyalists, the scots-Irish, the Irish, the british army settlers , etc. all contributed to an economic star that was NB before confederation.....no wonder macdonald wanted new brunswick in his pack...for new brunswick was center of business, trade, research , development..much more than quebec or ontarion..so lets all stand up for new brunswick.  



    Roy Nicholl
    Reply to @Maggie Leard wrote:
    "french language was never a historic language for new brunswick"

    After the indigenous languages, the Acadiens were speaking French in what is now New Brunswick, before ".the loyalists, the scots-Irish, the Irish, the british army settlers" arrived.

    "so lets all stand up for new brunswick."

    I agree, but it is disingenuous to state that after the false statements and vitriol which proceeded.


     
    Al Clark
    Reply to @Larry Larson: Well I sure hope this new chick knows to mind her own bidniss if she walks into a prominent gov bldg and the guard that greets her clearly can't speak both official languages!! LOL!

     
    Fred Brewer 
    Reply to @Marc Martin: "So no English has ever complained?" There were lots of complaints from anglophones but most were rejected and not investigated. I don't think this form of discrimination will happen under Ms. MacLean's watch.

     
    Will Benedikt 
    Reply to @Jason Inness: Anglophone. Francophone.....geeeze people get an iPhone and be done with the bull

     
    Larry Larson
    Reply to @Marc Martin: It was not her job to make up a phony complaint! Why are you ok with her being a li ar?

     
    David Amos  
    Reply to @Fred Brewer: "There were lots of complaints from anglophones but most were rejected and not investigated."

    Methjnks many lawyers know that I have the proof of that fact and published it on the Internet many years before I sued the Queen in 2015 but you never read anything I write N'esy Pas?


     
    David Amos  
    Reply to @Larry Larson: Welcome to the Circus













    Rod McLeod
    How did we pull off a coup like this?


    David Amos 
    Reply to @Rod McLeod: Who is we?















    Tom Gordon
    This province would be totally bilingual by now if the school system had merged into one back in 1970 and everyone had to learn how to speak both official languages. All the government has done for the past 50+ years is create a bigger gap and more segregation than ever.


    Al Clark 
    Reply to @Tom Gordon: You should google assimilation.


    Toby Tolly 
    Reply to @Al Clark: there was no assimilation until they left for greener pastures


    Al Clark
    Reply to @Toby Tolly: Huh?! Seems like a lot should google assimilation.


    Toby Tolly 
    Reply to @Al Clark: to make a short story short
    give us your U de M definition



    Norman Hall
    Reply to @Al Clark: And, Al, perhaps you should google “condescending”. You may find a photo of yourself.


    Al Clark 
    Reply to @Norman Hall: Condescending because I can read and write, or because I don't look down on people that look or sound different??


    Al Clark 
    Reply to @Toby Tolly: How bout a Britannica definition. Careful, big words!
    https://www.britannica.com/topic/assimilation-society



    Al Clark  
    Reply to @Toby Tolly: greener pastures??????????


    Al Clark 
    Reply to @Toby Tolly: U de M definition? Ah there's that COR charm we were looking for!

     
    Marc Martin
    Reply to @Tom Gordon: The schools were mixed before IT DID NOT WORK.
     

    Marc Martin 
    Reply to @Al Clark: Yep and notice they dont put their real names..


    David Amos 
    Reply to @Marc Martin: Methinks a lot of folks agree that is not your pal's real name N'esy Pas?


    Al Clark
    Reply to @David Amos: Reason number 3226 why you don't know what you're talking about, naysay paws


    Marc Martin 
    Reply to @David Amos: Who yanked your chain Davis?


    David Amos 
    Reply to @Marc Martin: Who is Davis and is he Al's pal? 
     

    Al Clark
    Reply to @David Amos: you know you and I are the very best of pals ray, neigh say paw?


    David Amos  
    Reply to @Al Clark: Nope However methinks everybody knows that I am truly honoured by the fact that you SANB dudes hate me N'esy Pas?







    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:05:50 +0000
    Subject: RE: Methinks Catherine Tait and her nasty minions in CBC just
    crossed the line bigtime N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    comments.

    Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    commentaires.






    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:05:46 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Catherine Tait and her nasty minions in CBC just
    crossed the line bigtime N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Merci encore pour votre courriel.




    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 17:05:47 +0000
    Subject: Automatic Reply
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil.

    This is an automatic confirmation your email has been received.

    Warmest Regards,

    Premier's Correspondence Team


    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 13:05:43 -0400
    Subject: Methinks Catherine Tait and her nasty minions in CBC just crossed the line bigtime
    N'esy Pas?
    To: kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca, Catherine.Tait@cbc.ca, sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, cps@calgarypolice.ca, grcanning@gmail.com,
    Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, premier@ontario.caNewsroom@globeandmail.com,
    Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Barbara.Whitenect@gnb.ca,
    eps@edmontonpolice.ca, ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca, premier@gov.ab.ca, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca, philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, denis.landry2@gnb.ca, carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jack.keir@gnb.ca,
    Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
    Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
    kathleen.roussel@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, themayor@calgary.ca,
    brian.gallant@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, jeff.carr@gnb.ca, benoit.bourque@gnb.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, Hamish.Wright@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, roger.l.melanson@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, Bill.Morneau@canada.ca, Ginette.PetitpasTaylor@parl.gc.ca,
    newsroom@globeandmail.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, jake.stewart@gnb.ca, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, andre@jafaust.com, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca,
    Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, Connell.Smith@cbc.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, tyler.campbell@gnb.ca, nick.brown@gnb.ca, Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca, Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca, barb.whitenect@gnb.ca,
    Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, robert.gauvin@gnb.ca,
    sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.comStephen.Horsman@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca, Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca, pablo.rodriguez@parl.gc.ca,
    Chuck.Thompson@cbc.ca, votejohnw@gmail.com, Wayne.Long@parl.gc.ca, robmoorefundy@gmail.com, robert.mckee@gnb.ca
    Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, RoseAnn.Smith@gnb.ca, janet.johnston@gnb.ca, rosswetmore@bellaliant.com, DH.MS.Medicare@gnb.ca, Norman.Bosse@gnb.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca

    Your account has been banned permanently. Reason: Your username is a
    violation of our Submission Guidelines, for more information please
    visit: http://www.cbc.ca/aboutcbc/discover/submissions.html. Your
    account has been blocked and all comments associated are no longer
    viewable by other users on our site. If you believe this has been done
    in error please contact us via cbc.ca/contact..


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:56:31 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Shirley MacLean, the current deputy
    executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society has lots of time
    to review my file that she created in 2004 N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Merci encore pour votre courriel.





    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:56:35 +0000
    Subject: RE: Methinks Shirley MacLean, the current deputy executive
    director of the New Brunswick Law Society has lots of time to review
    my file that she created in 2004 N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    comments.

    Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    commentaires.



    On 11/22/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> wrote:


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/shirley-maclean-languages-commissioner-1.5369323


    Shirley MacLean tapped as province's next official languages commissioner

    Current deputy executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society will start new role in July





    Shirley MacLean, the deputy executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society, has been selected as the province's next commissioner of official languages. (Shane Magee/CBC)

    The Higgs government has named Shirley MacLean, the current deputy executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society, as the province's next commissioner of official languages.

    MacLean will replace acting commissioner Michel Carrier, whose term ends on July 23.

    A selection committee recommended MacLean's candidacy to the Legislative Assembly, which accepted her, for a seven-year term.

    MacLean is English-speaking but is fluent in French and "has always had an acute sensitivity to the reality of the francophone community," said Christian Michaud, the outgoing president of the New Brunswick bar.

    Michaud, who has known MacLean for 25 years, said he has a great deal of respect for her and believes she will "succeed in bridging the gap between the two linguistic communities."

    In addition to being deputy executive director of the law society, MacLean is also the registrar of complaints, which makes her well-equipped for the role of commissioner of official languages,
    according to Michaud.

    "Shirley has always been able to hold her own. She has always been able to work in the public interest," he said.

    With files from Radio-Canada

    CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

    High hopes new languages commissioner Shirley MacLean will help bridge linguistic divide

    Anglophone MacLean, deputy executive director of New Brunswick Law Society, is fluent in French

    The Higgs government has named Shirley MacLean, the current deputy executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society, as the province's next commissioner of official languages. 0:36
     

    Asked whether having an anglophone in the position might help ease tensions, Premier Blaine Higgs said it shouldn't matter, as long as the person is bilingual.

    "But if it does then … maybe that's a good thing. But [ideally], it shouldn't matter whether they're anglophone or francophone," he said.

    "Maybe one day as we go forward we'll be all so fluently bilingual that it just will be a non-issue. Won't that be eureka?"

    Higgs is not bilingual. He is the first unilingual premier elected since 1970. He started French lessons after he won the Progressive Conservative leadership and can now read documents and deliver prepared speeches, but he has said he still has difficulty conversing.

    MacLean vowed to do her best to "react independently and fairly to everyone."

    I am a person who learned French late in life, so I may be an example of what it can be like for everyone in New Brunswick.
    - Shirley MacLean, official languages commissioner

    She also hopes her personal experience, as an English-speaker who learned French, might help inspire others.

    "I am a person who learned French late in life so I may be an example of what it can be like for everyone in New Brunswick," she said.

    In 2016, 33.9 per cent of New Brunswickers were bilingual, according to Statistics Canada.

    More than 72 per cent of New Brunswickers whose mother tongue is French are bilingual, compared to 15.4 per cent of New Brunswickers whose first language is English.

    Integrity commissioner appointed

    The official languages commissioner is mandated to investigate complaints under the Official Languages Act, to report on and make recommendations on compliance with the act, and to promote the advancement of both official languages in the province.

    The commissioner reports to the legislature and is responsible for an annual report to the legislative assembly.

    The former permanent commissioner, Katherine d'Entremont, retired in July 2018 after five years in the position and 37 years in public service.

    Charles Murray, who has been interim integrity commissioner pending a permanent appointment, was also appointed Friday to the role for a seven-year term.

    Murray will vacate his current position as the provincial ombud, so the search will begin for a successor.

    The Office of the Integrity Commissioner administers the Members' Conflict of Interest Act, the Conflict of Interest Act and the Lobbyists' Registration Act, and aims to encourage and sustain a culture of integrity and accountability.

    With files from Radio-Canada

     
     
    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:17:49 -0400
    Subject: Methinks nearly anyone is capable of Googling the following two names N'esy Pas?
    David Raymond Amos Shirley MacLean
    To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, claude.poirier@snb.ca, Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, charles.murray@gnb.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com, sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com,
    steve.murphy@ctv.ca, news@dailygleaner.com, macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com, tj@burkelaw.ca, martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Roger.Brown@fredericton.ca,

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:56:31 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Shirley MacLean, the current deputy
    executive director of the New Brunswick Law Society has lots of time
    to review my file that she created in 2004 N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.

    You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
    reviewed and taken into consideration.

    There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
    need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
    correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
    response may take several business days.

    Thanks again for your email.
    ______­­

    Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
    nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.

    Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
    considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.

    Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
    responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
    la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
    ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.

    Merci encore pour votre courriel.





    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
    Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 16:56:35 +0000
    Subject: RE: Methinks Shirley MacLean, the current deputy executive
    director of the New Brunswick Law Society has lots of time to review
    my file that she created in 2004 N'esy Pas?
    To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
    correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
    comments.

    Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
    électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
    commentaires.


    http://govinjustice.blogspot.com/2008/03/letter-from-law-society-of-nb.html

    http://gypsy-blog.blogspot.com/2008/03/media-restrains-itself-inexplicably.html

    Thanx again Gypsy for allowing my comment to stand the test of time. I
    notice my noname fan club has their usual mindless coments.

    Whereas the topic of this particular blog is that the media is
    restraining itself Methinks bloggers who claim to be honest are no
    different. the far from ethical Chucky Leblanc is back to his old
    tricks of blocking me for the benefit of his blogger General T.J.
    Burke. It appears to me that they made a deal after he ate some
    pancakes with his other liberal buddies.

    I wonder if you should bring a long fork when you have breakfast with
    the Devil? Anyway I commented emailed and posted about the blogger
    media restaining iself in my blog and yours. It is another one of
    those things I do the corrupt politicians don't seem to appreciate.

    I figured you would get a kick out of the threat the snobby lawyer who
    works for T.J made to me. He is the same lawyer that beat Mr. Hyslop
    bigtime recently. Ya think he would be smart enough not to admit that
    I sent him evidence of murder EH?

    Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:23:18 -0300
    From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    To: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"David.Eidt@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
    t.j.burke@gnb.ca, police@fredericton.ca, danny.copp@fredericton.ca,
    jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, jeff.mockler@gnb.ca,
    samperrier@hotmail.com
    Subject: Re: Hey Mr Eidt is it you or the RCMP I argue in order to get
    my Harley and the wiretap tapes back?

    Go cry a river to your boss T.J. Burke or his buddy Jeff Mockler I
    know what I sent you and I understand your obligations as a lawyer and
    a public servant . It is not harrassment to expect a bureaucrat in the
    justice dept to uphold the law.

    You are a liar sir please allow me to tell your boss and the cops for
    you what I think of you. Please call the cops I already have your
    false allegations in writing and you have only some of my files.

    Can you think of any reason why I shouldn't sue you personally someday
    after we argue professionally?

    Veritas Vincit
    Davidraymond Amos


    On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Eidt, David (OAG/CPG) David.Eidt@gnb.ca wrote:

    Mr. Amos,

    You sent me two pieces of email on March 24, 2008. They have nothing
    to do with me either personally or professionally. Please note that
    your correspondence is unwanted. Any further such communications will
    be considered harassing in nature. Please do not send me any more of
    your communications.

    Regards,

    David Eidt
    Legal Services
    Office of the Attorney General
    Tel: (506) 453-3964
    Fax: (506) 453-3275
    david.eidt@gnb.ca

    Notice : CONFIDENTIAL and PRIVILEGED. This document contains
    privileged and confidential information and should not be distributed
    or copied to anyone without prior consultation with the author. Thank
    you.

    Avis : CONFIDENTIEL et PRIVILÉGIÉ. Ce document contient des
    renseignements privilégiés et confidentiels et ne devrait être copié
    ou circulé sans consultation préalable avec l'auteur. Merci.

    http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.com/2008/03/blogger-genral-burke-will-not-post-all.html

    T.J. Burke and his little buddy Chucky said this in his blog while
    they both block me.

    Go figure why I must email eh?

    At 10:36 AM, March 25, 2008 , T.J. Burke said...
    Reality is, I just don't post libelous, slanderous or insensitive remarks.


    At 10:50 AM, March 25, 2008 , Charles LeBlanc said...
    Excuse moi General Sir?

    I hope you don't mean moi???

    I always speaks the truth!!!!

    :P



    https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

    David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
    Replying to @DavidRayAmos @Kathryn98967631 and  49 others
    Methinks Shirley MacLean, the deputy executive director of the New
    Brunswick Law Society should review my file before she takes her new
    position N'esy Pas?

    https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/11/first-anglophone-to-be-named-languages.html


     #cdnpoli #nbpoli


    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/shirley-maclean-new-brunswick-language-commissioner-1.5371960

    First anglophone to be named languages commissioner hopes her example
    will inspire
    Shirley MacLean is originally from Cape Breton but has lived here for
    more than 30 years

    Elizabeth Fraser · CBC News · Posted: Nov 25, 2019 11:14 AM AT


    114 Comments

    David Amos
    Methinks Shirley MacLean, the deputy executive director of the New
    Brunswick Law Society should review my file before she takes her new
    position N'esy Pas?

    Al Clark
    Reply to @David Amos: neigh. paws.

    Lewis Taylor
    Reply to @David Amos:
    Why would she waste her time on you? more important things to do. just
    post and be happy.

    David Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Lewis Taylor: Methinks even you are capable of Googling the
    following two names N'esy Pas? David Raymond Amos Shirley MacLean











    Brian Robertson

    If there was ever an incentive for Maritime union, it would be to undo
    Frank McKenna's betrayal of New Brunswick.

    Al Clark
    Reply to @Brian Robertson: "Frank McKenna's betrayal of New Brunswick"
    Oh, please elaborate ;-)

    Brian Robertson
    Reply to @Al Clark:
    His backroom deal with Mulroney to slip Bill 88 into the Constitution,
    despite Meech Lake crashing and burning.
    That preposal would NEVER have passed on its own.


    Shawn McShane
    Reply to @Al Clark: Call centers and minimum wages while on the back
    end foreign workers beneath the radar.





    Al Clark
    Reply to @Brian Robertson: Mulroney? The Con? Post 87? Have you heard
    of the guy that was in there for 17 years before frankie?

    Al Clark
    Reply to @Shawn McShane: I think you fergot clearcuts and roundup?

    David Amos
    Reply to @Brian Robertson: BINGO





    David Amos
    Reply to @Al Clark: Methinks you know I forget nothing as you SANB
    dudes try hard to forget Federal Court File No T-1557-15 N'esy Pas?




    David Amos
    Content disabled
    Reply to @Al Clark: Methinks if you SANB dudes read anything then you
    would know what Frank McKenna, his former partner Justice Richard Bell
    and legions of lawyers throughout Canada and the USA know. The fact is
    that Shirley MacLean answered my complaint against a liberal/Yankee
    lawyer in 2004 and that I filed her answer in the public record of a
    Yankee Court ASAP and the Federal Court of Canada several years ago
    N'esy Pas?

    David Amos
    Reply to @David Amos: Too late already emailed and blogged


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)"<Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
    Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:11:58 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian
    Title people, the Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that
    I will figure out what a form 13a is.
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Hello,

    I will be out of the office from August 9-24 inclusive. I will reply
    to your email upon my return, however, I will be checking emails
    periodically. Thank you.

    Bonjour,

    Je serai absent du bureau du 9 au 24 août inclusivement.  Je répondrai
    à votre courriel à mon retour, mais, je vérifierai régulièrement les
    courriels. Merci.
    - Hide quoted text -



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 06:11:54 -0700
    Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian
    Title people, the Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that
    I will figure out what a form 13a is.
    To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

    (Français à suivre)

    If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
    email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca

    If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca

    Thank you.

    Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
    ‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca

    Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca

    Merci.

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 09:11:48 -0400
    Subject: Hey Serge Trust that the First Canadian Title people, the
    Fidelity minions and many lawyers will tell you that I will figure out
    what a form 13a is.
    To: serge.gauvin@snb.ca, patrick.windle@snb.ca, "claude.poirier"
    <claude.poirier@snb.ca>, "john.mcnair"<john.mcnair@snb.ca>,
    Erin.Hardy@snb.ca, "alan.roy"<alan.roy@snb.ca>
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
    , "brian.gallant"
    <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
    MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, "serge.rousselle"
    <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca, "greg.byrne"
    <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
    >,
    "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
    <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

    Serge Gauvin
    Registrar General of Land Titles
    Called to the bar: 1995 (NB)
    Phone: 506-457-6933
    Fax: 506-444-3033
    Email: serge.gauvin@snb.ca
    Patrick V. Windle
    Deputy Registrar General of Land Titles
    Called to the bar: 1997 (NB)
    Email: patrick.windle@snb.ca
    Service New Brunswick
    Land Registry, 985 College Hill Rd.
    PO Box 1998, Stn. A
    Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5G4

    ---------- Original message ----------
    From: "Auto-reply from kevhache@nb.aibn.com"<kevhache@nb.aibn.com>
    Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2018 18:20:04 -0400
    Subject: Re: Too Funny I just talked to Claude Landry Elvy Robichaud’s
    old Chief of Staff He forgot what went down in 2004 and the emails I
    sent him since
    To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

    Bonjour

    Je serais absent du bureau du 6 aout au   22 aout inclusivement.  Le
    bureau sera fermé du 6 au 19 aout inclusivement pour les vacances d
    ete et sera ouvert a partir du 20 aout.  Bonne Vacance a tous

    Je retournerais votre courriel a mon retour.

    Kevin J. Hache

    CABINET KEVIN J. HACHE
    8 Boul St-Pierre Ouest
    C.P. 5662
    Caraquet NB E1W 1B7
    506 727 5150 (telephone)
    506 727 6686 (telecopieur)
    kevhache@nb.sympatico.ca


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:01:57 -0700
    Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: Fwd: I just called Alan Roy again about
    my right to health care, my missing 1965 Harley, the Yankee Wiretaps
    tapes in its saddlebag and Federal Court and his assistant played dumb
    as usual
    To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

    (Français à suivre)

    If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
    email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca

    If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca

    Thank you.

    Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
    ‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca

    Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca

    Merci.




    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
    Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 10:42:09 -0400
    Subject: Attn Marc Richard and John McNair I just called AGAIN Say hey
    to my Brother in Law W. S. Reid CHEDORE and his brother of the law
    David Lutz QC for me will ya?
    To: MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, John.McNair@snb.ca,
    "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, Erin.Hardy@snb.ca,
    David.Eidt@gnb.ca
    Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
    Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2017 22:51:09 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: RE Irving's ridiculous constitutional
    challenge and Federal Court File no T-1557-15 I wonder if George
    Cooper and Hélène Beaulieure even know how many times the Irvings and
    partners of their VERY snobby law firm have offended me over t...
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I will be out of the office until October 30, 2017.  Je serai absent
    du bureau jusqu'au 30 octobre 2017.


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
    Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
    would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
    did she take all four copies?
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
    little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
    Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
    Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
    bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "McNair, John (SNB)"<John.McNair@snb.ca>
    Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:29 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
    Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I will be out of the office August 1 - August 12. I will reply to your
    email when I return. If you require immediate assistance, please
    contact Chantal Leger at 663-2510. Thank you.

    Je serai absent du bureau les 1 aout - 12 aout. Je répondrai à votre
    courriel à mon retour. Si vous nécessitez de l'assistance
    immédiatement, veuillez contacter Chantal Leger au 663-2510. Merci.



    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: "Hardy, Erin (SNB)"<Erin.Hardy@snb.ca>
    Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:04:28 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
    Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Le francais suit:

    Hello,

    I am currently out of the office. I will gladly reply to your message
    upon my return on August 15, 2016. Should you require immediate
    assitance please contact Celeste Savoie at (506) 471-5290 or by email:
    Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.

    Have a nice day!

    Bonjour,

    Je suis presentement hors du bureau. Il me fera plaisir de repondre a
    votre message a mon retour August 15, 2016. Si vous avez besoin d'une
    assitance immediate, veuillez communiquer avec Celeste Savoie au (506)
    471-5290 ou par courriel a: Celeste.Savoie@snb.ca.

    Bonne journee!


    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
    Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:43:27 +0000
    Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My we just talked briefly Correct Ms
    Beaulieu? It appears to me that the latest President of the NB Law
    Society thinks non lawyers are not worth talking to
    To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    I will be out of the office until July 21, 2014. Je serai absent du
    bureau jusqu'au 21 juillet 2014.



    > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
    > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
    > Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    > To: coi@gnb.ca
    > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >
    > Good Day Sir
    >
    > After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
    > to speak to one of your staff for the first time
    >
    > Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
    > answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
    > at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
    > Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
    >
    > These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
    > suggested that you study closely.
    >
    > This is the docket in Federal Court
    >
    > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
    >
    > These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
    >
    > Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
    >
    > January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
    >
    > April 3rd, 2017
    >
    > https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
    >
    >
    > This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
    >
    > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
    >
    >
    > The only hearing thus far
    >
    > May 24th, 2017
    >
    > https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
    >
    >
    > This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
    >
    > Date: 20151223
    >
    > Docket: T-1557-15
    >
    > Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
    >
    > PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
    >
    > BETWEEN:
    >
    > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    >
    > Plaintiff
    >
    > and
    >
    > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    >
    > Defendant
    >
    > ORDER
    >
    > (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
    > December 14, 2015)
    >
    > The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
    > the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
    > 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
    > in its entirety.
    >
    > At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
    > letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
    > capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
    > Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
    > (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
    > he stated:
    >
    > As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
    > work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
    > You are your brother’s keeper.
    >
    > Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
    > colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
    > expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
    > people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
    > or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
    > me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
    > Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
    > Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
    > Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
    > former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
    > Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
    > Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
    > of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
    > Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
    > Police.
    >
    > In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
    > personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
    > potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
    > of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
    > hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
    > Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
    > [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
    > allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
    > requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
    >
    >
    > AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
    > the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
    > is no order as to costs.
    >
    > “B. Richard Bell”
    > Judge
    >
    >
    > Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
    > already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
    > to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
    >
    >  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
    > Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
    > bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
    > lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
    >
    > "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
    >
    >
    > ---------- Original message ----------
    > From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
    > Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
    > Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
    > Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
    > submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
    > dudes are way past too late
    > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
    >
    > Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
    > lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >
    > Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
    > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >
    > Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
    > lalanthier@hotmail.com
    >
    > To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
    > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
    >
    > Thank you,
    >
    > Merci ,
    >
    >
    > http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
    >
    >
    > 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
    > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
    > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
    > five years after he began his bragging:
    >
    > January 13, 2015
    > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
    >
    > December 8, 2014
    > Why Canada Stood Tall!
    >
    > Friday, October 3, 2014
    > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
    > Stupid Justin Trudeau
    >
    > Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
    > behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
    >
    > When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
    > actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
    > in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
    > the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
    > involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
    > significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
    > of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
    > operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
    > Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
    > The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
    > deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
    > Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
    > redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
    > less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
    > alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
    > then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
    > incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
    > professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
    > Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
    > campaign of 2006.
    >
    > What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
    > Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
    > Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
    > support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
    >
    > What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
    > chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
    > less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
    > as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
    > deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
    >
    > The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
    > the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
    > That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
    > constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
    > remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
    > non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
    > regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
    > instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
    > limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
    >
    > President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
    > attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
    > Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
    > and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
    > initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
    >
    > P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
    > the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
    > had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
    > Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
    >
    > Subject:
    > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
    > From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
    > To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    >
    > January 30, 2007
    >
    > WITHOUT PREJUDICE
    >
    > Mr. David Amos
    >
    > Dear Mr. Amos:
    >
    > This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
    > 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
    >
    > Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
    > taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
    > Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
    >
    > Sincerely,
    >
    > Honourable Michael B. Murphy
    > Minister of Health
    >
    > CM/cb
    >
    >
    > Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
    >
    > Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
    > From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    > To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
    > nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
    > motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
    > CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
    > Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
    > "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    > Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
    > forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
    >
    > Dear Mr. Amos,
    >
    > Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
    > over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
    > was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
    >
    > As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
    > is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
    > testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
    > Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
    > services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
    > instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
    >
    > As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
    > imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
    > that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
    > the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
    > and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
    >
    > It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
    > December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
    >
    >  Sincerely,
    >
    > Warren McBeath, Cpl.
    > GRC Caledonia RCMP
    > Traffic Services NCO
    > Ph: (506) 387-2222
    > Fax: (506) 387-4622
    > E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
    >
    >
    >
    > Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
    > Office of the Integrity Commissioner
    > Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
    > Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
    > tel.: 506-457-7890
    > fax: 506-444-5224
    > e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
    >

    ---------- Forwarded message ----------
    From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
    Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
    Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
    To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>

    Mr. Amos,
    We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
    Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
    Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
    of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
    against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
    General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
    not be responding to further emails on this matter.

    Department of Justice

    On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

    > If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
    > Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
    >
    > http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
    > ilian.html
    >
    >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
    >>
    >> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
    >> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
    >>
    >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
    >>
    >> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
    >> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
    >> cards?
    >>
    >> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
    >> 6
    >>
    >> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
    >>
    >> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
    >>
    >> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
    >>
    >> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
    >> Senator Arlen Specter
    >> United States Senate
    >> Committee on the Judiciary
    >> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
    >> Washington, DC 20510
    >>
    >> Dear Mr. Specter:
    >>
    >> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
    >> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
    >> raised in the attached letter.
    >>
    >> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
    >>
    >> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
    >>
    >> Very truly yours,
    >> Barry A. Bachrach
    >> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
    >> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
    >> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
    >>
    >

    http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


    Sunday, 19 November 2017
    Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
    It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
    The Supreme Court

    https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


    Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

    Amos v. Canada
    Court (s) Database

    Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
    Date

    2017-10-30
    Neutral citation

    2017 FCA 213
    File numbers

    A-48-16
    Date: 20171030

    Docket: A-48-16
    Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    CORAM:

    WEBB J.A.
    NEAR J.A.
    GLEASON J.A.


    BETWEEN:
    DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    Respondent on the cross-appeal
    (and formally Appellant)
    and
    HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    Appellant on the cross-appeal
    (and formerly Respondent)
    Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
    Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
    REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

    THE COURT



    Date: 20171030

    Docket: A-48-16
    Citation: 2017 FCA 213
    CORAM:

    WEBB J.A.
    NEAR J.A.
    GLEASON J.A.


    BETWEEN:
    DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
    Respondent on the cross-appeal
    (and formally Appellant)
    and
    HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
    Appellant on the cross-appeal
    (and formerly Respondent)
    REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

    I.                    Introduction

    [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
    filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
    against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
    in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
    Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
    properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
    that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
    Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
    (Claim at para. 96).

    [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
    motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
    Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
    amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
    disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
    and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
    Prothontary’s Order).


    [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
    Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
    Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
    Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
    for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
    2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


    [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
    Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
    Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
    As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
    cross-appeal.


    II.                 Preliminary Matter

    [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
    relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
    6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
    the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
    This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
    had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
    Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
    several judges but did not name those judges.

    [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
    identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
    had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
    with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
    Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
    the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
    subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
    c. F-7:


    5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
    office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
    jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
    Appeal.
    […]

    5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
    d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
    les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
    […]
    5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
    that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
    jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

    5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
    Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
    juges de la Cour fédérale.


    [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
    judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
    versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
    Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
    section.
    [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
    3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
    Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
    continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
    for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
    a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

    3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
    fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
    français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
    à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
    Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
    continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
    matière civile et pénale.
    4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
    — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
    English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
    additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
    the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
    court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

    4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
    première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
    Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
    maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
    d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
    canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
    compétence en matière civile et pénale.


    [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
    two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
    (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
    Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
    need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
    Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
    to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
    file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
    decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
    that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
    appeal book.


    [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
    March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
    Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
    conflict in any matter related to him.


    [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
    before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
    conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
    Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
    Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
    Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
    Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
    cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
    Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
    will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
    before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
    relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


    [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
    the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
    submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
    conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
    afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
    that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
    view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
    documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
    documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
    judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
    copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
    such judge had a conflict.


    [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
    that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
    2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
    that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
    had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
    therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
    of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
    personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
    Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
    was a member of such firm.


    [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
    appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
    focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
    Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
    the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
    particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
    lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
    after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
    Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


    [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
    alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
    Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
    Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
    practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
    Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
    who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
    affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
    that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
    letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
    Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
    Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
    “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
    Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
    possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
    [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
    was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
    Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
    259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
    judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
    apprehension of bias:
    60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
    criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
    Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
    Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
    reasonable apprehension of bias:
    … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
    reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
    question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
    of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
    viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
    the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
    than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
    unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

    [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
    person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
    thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
    give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
    previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
    administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
    rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
    Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
    also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
    (4th) 193).

    [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
    Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
    Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
    particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
    case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
    involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
    Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
    judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
    lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
    determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
    rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
    27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
    finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
    which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
    as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


    28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
    asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
    the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
    taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
    defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
    judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
    Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
    Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
    there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
    and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


    29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
    inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
    different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
    judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
    of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
    conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
    involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
    in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
    for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
    interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
    statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
    information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
    opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
    His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
    had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
    unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


    30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
    of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
    disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
    two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
    recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
    that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
    that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
    time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
                To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
    the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
    involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
    the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
    circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
    or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
    31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
    Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
    trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
    been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
    his former firm for a considerable period of time.


    32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
    realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
    and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
    of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
    in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
    In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
    trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
    his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
    decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
    either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
    client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
    off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
    client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
    earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
    events from over a decade ago.
    (emphasis added)

    [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
    involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
    Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
    clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
    alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
    Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
    Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
    Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
    had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
    was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
    involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
    with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
    sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
    Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
    also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
    Webb hearing this appeal.

    [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
    (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
    reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
    the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
    with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

    [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
    F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
    reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
    lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
    was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
    Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
    Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

    [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
    stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
    of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
    He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
    entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
    and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
    to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
    police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
    enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
    conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

    [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
    apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
    to recuse himself.

    [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
    experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
    the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
    confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
    Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

    [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
    Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
    that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
    a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
    both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
    Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
    begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
    you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
    was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
    Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
    for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
    not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


    III.               Issue

    [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
    Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
    in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
    Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
    legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

    IV.              Analysis

    A.                 Standard of Review

    [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
    Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
    be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
    made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
    Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
    402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
    this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
    articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
    [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
    Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
    prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
    case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
    the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
    error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
    law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
    a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
    if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
    determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
    (Hospira at paras. 82-83).

    [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
    assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
    must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
    erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
    interfere.


    B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
    Prothonotary’s Order?

    [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
    paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
    Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

    17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
    addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
    of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
    in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
    the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
    the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
    or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
    does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
    (…)


    21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
    provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
    the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
    Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
    determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
    A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
    only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
    best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
    suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
    [footnotes omitted].


    [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
    on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
    that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
    liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
    who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
    included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
    the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
    paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
    identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
    Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
    para. 27).


    [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
    cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
    identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
    2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


    [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
    69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
    determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
    element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

    a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
    conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

    b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
    conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

    c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
    officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
    public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
    Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
    (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

    [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
    material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
    public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
    Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
    “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

    [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
    in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
    D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

    …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
    assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
    negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
    “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
    upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
    conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
    of process…

    To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
    requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
    out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
    officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
    office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
    mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
    allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
    a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
    (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

    [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
    Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
    absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

    [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
    disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
    basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
    ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
    the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
    engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
    conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
    faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
    the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
    these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
    non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
    Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
    the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
    barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
    supporting a cause of action.

    [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
    allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
    reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
    Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
    Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
    find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
    The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
    amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

    V.                 Conclusion
    [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
    cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
    dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
    November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
    without leave to amend.
    "Wyman W. Webb"
    J.A.
    "David G. Near"
    J.A.
    "Mary J.L. Gleason"
    J.A.



    FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
    NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

    A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
    JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
    DOCKET:

    A-48-16



    STYLE OF CAUSE:

    DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



    PLACE OF HEARING:

    Fredericton,
    New Brunswick

    DATE OF HEARING:

    May 24, 2017

    REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

    WEBB J.A.
    NEAR J.A.
    GLEASON J.A.

    DATED:

    October 30, 2017

    APPEARANCES:
    David Raymond Amos


    For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
    (on his own behalf)

    Jan Jensen


    For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

    SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
    Nathalie G. Drouin
    Deputy Attorney General of Canada

    For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL


    https://www.facebook.com/johnwilliamsonNB/photos/a.848901995163272.1073741826.172576949462450/1765074580212671/?type=3

    John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick Southwest
    May 17 at 12:48pm ·

    Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
    nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
    the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.

    Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
    issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
    Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
    2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
    that his local campaign was strong.

    How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
    John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
    here: https://donate.conservative.ca/membership/

    There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
    be made, and events already planned.

    Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
    506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!

    Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
    ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.

    And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
    and to learn about upcoming events.

    Go John! And Vote John W!

    Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
    Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
    federal politics
    CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT | Last Updated: May 28
    Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he
    won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)

    New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its
    highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.

    Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead
    jump into federal politics.

    Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA
    said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who
    beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.

    "It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong
    voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my
    heart.

    "I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's
    very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis,
    I want to move on."

    Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
    nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
    riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)

    Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative
    nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes
    part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.

        Health critic slams 'gutting' of top doctor's office

        Blaine Higgs faces internal PC dissent over appointment

    That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John
    Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the
    riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding
    will nominate their candidate June 28.

    Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton.
    The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with
    national organizations that advocate for veterans.

    "I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he said.

        Blaine Higgs wins N.B. PC leadership race on 3rd ballot

        Tory leadership hopefuls scramble to be 'second choice' of rivals'
    supporters

    Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC
    leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under
    Higgs.

    Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and
    the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of
    becoming a minister.

    But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it
    does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go
    another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my
    options would be limited after that."

    The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him
    realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.

    Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
    years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
    Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
    Fredericton for the 2008 election.

    After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
    Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
    the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
    defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.

    Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive
    Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

    In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the
    first ballot out of seven candidates.

    Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial
    party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.

    "It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre
    candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.
     
     

    Minister's letter backing Irving Oil application 'inappropriate,' former EUB intervener says

    $
    0
    0

     https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies 

     

    Image

     

     

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/ministers-accountable-legislature-public-1.5891540

     

    Ministers accountable to legislature, not public, says minister

    Political panel discuses energy minister's letter to Energy and Utilities Board

     

    CBC News· Posted: Jan 28, 2021 3:26 PM AT |

     


    Irving Oil is seeking an increase to wholesale petroleum prices. Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland wrote a letter to the EUB saying they should act quickly on the matter. (Karissa Donkin/CBC)

    A New Brunswick cabinet minister is standing by a colleague who wrote a letter to the Energy and Utilities Board that opposition MLAs are calling inappropriate.

    Irving Oil is seeking an increase to wholesale petroleum prices that could cost New Brunswickers $60 million more per year.

    Mike Holland, the minister of natural resources and energy development, wrote a letter to the EUB saying it should act quickly on the matter.

    "It has been suggested that the current margin in New Brunswick is not enough to guarantee continuity of supply in the challenging COVID-19 global environment," Holland wrote.

    "As a result I am supporting the application to review evidence in an expedited fashion and, if warranted, an interim order to increase the wholesale margin. If an interim order is warranted, I feel the severity of a possible supply issue means it should be issued at the earliest opportunity." 

    The letter provoked calls for Holland's resignation, since cabinet ministers don't normally involve themselves in matters before the EUB, an arms-length regulatory body. 

    Accountable to whom?

    Justice Minister Ted Flemming said in the end cabinet ministers are accountable to the legislature, not the people of the province.

    "In law the minister is accountable to the legislature," said Flemming. 

    "If you want to say 'I think it's public or I think it's [to the] premier,' you can have that opinion. But in law, he's accountable to the legislature,"


    Taking part in the panel this week, for the government Ted Flemming MLA for Rothesay, Robert McKee, the MLA for Moncton Center, David Coon, leader of the Green party and MLA for Fredericton South, and Kris Austin, leader of the People's Alliance party and MLA for Fredericton-Grand Lake. 42:29

    Liberal MLA Robert McKee said the letter was inappropriate and may constitute an ethics violation and pointed to the premier's past career with Irving Oil.

    "We have some serious questions that we feel should be investigated and answered …  with respect to the premier's direct involvement in this," said McKee.


    Justice Minister Ted Flemming said in the end cabinet ministers are accountable to the legislature, not the people of the province. (CBC)

    "It's no secret that he's a former Irving Oil executive. So we feel that there's an issue of conflict of interest that could arise in this with the premier being involved. Did he have communications with Irving Oil about this?"

    McKee said he wants the integrity commissioner to review the incident.


    Liberal MLA Robert McKee said the letter was inappropriate and may constitute an ethics violation and pointed to the premier’s past career with Irving. (CBC)

    Flemming took issue with the characterization of the premier, adding no one would claim Flemming himself was  a fan of the Irving family.

    "K.C. Irving did everything in his power to get my grandfather [former Premier Hugh John Flemming] out of office in 1960 because he wouldn't toe the Irving line," said Flemming. 

    "I'm no poster boy for the Irvings here."

    'It was inappropriate'

    Green party Leader David Coon said the minister abused his power when he wrote a letter to the EUB because he holds all the cards when it comes to the board's future

    "Underlying all of this, of course, is [the board] recognizing that the minister and the government has the opportunity to change the legislation under which they act," said Coon.


    Green party Leader David Coon said the minister abused his power by writing to the EUB because he holds all the cards when it comes to the board's future (Jacques Poitras/CBC News file photo)
     

    "The not too subtle implication would be 'If you don't hurry up your process, then you may just see your legislation changed so that there are new constraints on you in terms of the time available to render your decisions.' That's one of the underlying messages."

    People's Alliance Leader Kris Austin said the minister and the government will essentially be accountable to the people in the next election.


    People’s Alliance Leader Kris Austin said the minister and the government will essentially be accountable to the people in the next election. (Gary Moore/CBC)
     

    "I think most of the public in this case is looking at this and saying here is a government that's clearly putting industry over people," said Austin. 

    "It was inappropriate. And, you know, I think it tipped the government's hand on who they're really fighting for."

    With files from Information Morning Fredericton

      

     https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-oil-application-regulator-1.5878467

     

    Minister's letter backing Irving Oil application 'inappropriate,' former EUB intervener says

    Mike Holland draws criticism after urging EUB to act quickly on application for petroleum charge increase

     

    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Jan 19, 2021 5:00 AM AT 

     


    Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland wrote a letter to New Brunswick's Energy and Utilities Board, in which he said an Irving Oil application for petroleum price increases should be dealt with quickly. (Radio-Canada)

    A letter sent by Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland telling the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board how he thinks it should deal with an Irving Oil Ltd. application is drawing criticism, but the province is not apologizing for it.

    Holland sent the letter to the board on Jan. 6, one day after Irving Oil made an application to increase the amount petroleum wholesalers in the province can charge.

    If approved, it could cost consumers up to $60 million more per year.

    In the letter, Holland told the Energy and Utilities Board that industry members had "expressed concerns to government about the sufficiency of the current wholesale margin," and said he wanted the board to know he felt it should act quickly on the issues Irving Oil was raising.

    "It has been suggested that the current margin in New Brunswick is not enough to guarantee continuity of supply in the challenging COVID-19 global environment," Holland wrote.

    "As a result I am supporting the application to review evidence in an expedited fashion and, if warranted, an interim order to increase the wholesale margin. If an interim order is warranted, I feel the severity of a possible supply issue means it should be issued at the earliest opportunity." 

    Image

    I am calling on Minister Mike Holland to resign his cabinet seat because he wrote the EUB to tell them how he thinks it should deal with an Irving Oil application to increase wholesale charges on fuel oil, gasoline and diesel.
    Image

    Holland was not made available for an interview. But in an email Monday, Natural Resources Department spokesperson Nick Brown said the government approved of the letter's intent.

    "Government felt that it was prudent to support an application by industry to ensure petroleum products remain available to New Brunswickers," Brown said in the email.

    After CBC News reported on the letter, Green Party Leader David Coon called for Holland's resignation, saying the letter was an "egregious abuse" of power.

    Letter could be a first

    Hartland lawyer Peter Hyslop, a former Energy and Utilities Board public intervener, said he cannot recall a minister writing to the board directly in the past about a matter in front of it.

    "Totally inappropriate," Hyslop said after reviewing the letter.

    "I do see it as a serious abuse of the process."    

    Hyslop was appointed to represent the public interest at numerous board hearings by the former government of Bernard Lord.

    Peter Hyslop is a former public intervener at the Energy and Utilities Board and its predecessor, the Public Utilities Board. He said letters from government ministers to the board about matters it has under review are "totally inappropriate." (Pat Richard/CBC News file photo)

    About the Author

    Robert Jones

    Reporter

    Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-former-public-intervener-residential-customers-1.4158898 

     

    Former public intervener asks to represent NB Power's residential ratepayers

    Peter Hyslop gets support from P.E.I. consultant, who says residential customers need voice at rate hearings

    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Jun 14, 2017 6:00 AM AT


    A former public intervener, Hartland lawyer Peter Hyslop is arguing residential customers need to be represented by their own lawyer at future rate hearings. (CBC)

    With parties lining up to argue for higher residential electricity bills at NB Power's upcoming rate design hearing, especially for people who use electric heat, a former public intervener is arguing residential customers need to be represented by their own lawyer — and he is proposing himself for the job.

    Hartland lawyer Peter Hyslop says the interests of residential ratepayers need to be heard. (CBC)
    "The interests of the residential rate payers, as a class, are meritorious," Hartland lawyer Peter Hyslop wrote in a motion submitted to the Energy and Utilities Board this week.

    "It is necessary for the proper completion of the record in this application that the interests of the residential rate class be presented."

    Year-long review 

    NB Power is in the middle of a year-long look at how it bills various customers for electricity. The review could result in prices charged by the utility changing dramatically.

    Some of the most significant proposals are aimed at homeowners and apartment dwellers, including higher than average rate increases for that group, premium prices for electric heat and the possible adoption of different rates at different times of the day, different days of the week or different months of the year. 


    NB Power is undergoing a year-long review of how it bills various customers for electricity. (Shane Fowler/CBC)

    Companies that are already on record as favouring some of those ideas, including Enbridge Gas New Brunswick and J.D. Irving Ltd. have their own lawyers who will be presenting evidence and arguments in support of their positions.  


    Enbridge has long argued electric heat prices are artificially low in New Brunswick, making it more difficult for the company to attract customers while J.D. Irving has expressed concern industrial rates are too high, in part, because evidence has shown NB Power undercharges homeowners.

    'Advocate in the public interest'

    Heather Black, the current public intervener, will be participating at the hearing but she is not legally permitted to represent the interests of any single group, including residential customers. Instead she is exclusively required to "advocate in the public interest," even if the public interest is not necessarily favourable to homeowners.

    Public intervener Heather Black says she isn't legally permitted to represent the interests of any other single group. (CBC)

    "Legislation prohibits me from representing or advocating on behalf of a particular class of customers," Black wrote in a statement to CBC News.   

    "My role is to assist the Board by submitting evidence and advancing arguments that consider the broader public interest, which has many — sometimes conflicting — components."

    Residential consumers are NB Power's largest customer group, accounting for 46 per cent of the utility's in-province sales and Hyslop is arguing it needs aggressive and well-financed representation to avoid unfair treatment.

    Asks utility to pay costs

    In an unusual manoeuvre that began two weeks ago, Hyslop's legal assistant, Carolanne Power, applied to intervene in the rate design hearing as a residential customer and then gave notice she would be asking for Hyslop to represent her — and all other residential customers — at NB Power's expense.

    "She will be seeking an Order from the Board directing (NB Power) to pay her costs for the intervention, including but not limited to legal fees, professional advisors and all proper and necessary costs and expenses related thereto," reads Power's application. 

    P.E.I. energy consultant Robert O'Rourke agrees the residential rate class must be represented at hearings. (CBC)
    Neither NB Power nor Hyslop would agree to an interview prior to their motion being heard Thursday but have submitted partial arguments in writing, including an affidavit from P.E.I. regulatory consultant Robert O'Rourke.

    "I am of the view that the residential rate class must be represented in this matter to ensure that the proper evidence arguments and submissions before this Board can be properly presented," says O'Rourke's affadavit.  

    "In the absence of such evidence, representation and submissions I am of the view that a significant impact may result on today's residential rate class."

    No response

    NB Power did not immediately respond to questions about Hyslop's request that it pay his bills, but the request, if granted, could cost the utility hundreds of thousands of dollars.

    The province has paid a number of private practice lawyers over the years to intervene at Energy and Utilities Board hearings, and the bill for expert and legal fees has never been less than $40,000 and several times exceeded $500,000.

    Hyslop served as public intervener at a number of NB Power hearings more than a decade ago during the term of the Bernard Lord government.

    The current rate design hearing is not scheduled until April 2018 but there are several months of pre-hearing activities, including the preparation of studies and expert evidence.

     
     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-residential-representative-1.4162540


    EUB delays ruling on intervener for NB Power residential ratepayers

    Lawyer Peter Hyslop argues residential customers need someone to look after their interests alone at hearings


    Philip Drost· CBC News· Posted: Jun 15, 2017 5:18 PM AT

    Peter Hyslop made his case Thursday to speak for NB Power's residential customers when the Energy and Utilities Board considers rate changes. (Pat Richard/CBC News file photo)

    A decision on whether NB Power will have to pay for an intervener to represent residential ratepayers has been delayed while the Energy and Utilities Board considers the issue.

    Hartland lawyer Peter Hyslop, a former public intervener, made his case Thursday to represent residential NB Power customers when the board holds rate hearings that could lead to higher electricity bills.

    Hyslop suggested public intervener Heather Black isn't able to represent the best interests of residential customers, since they are just a part of the "public" covered by her mandate.

    Th board is preparing for hearings on NB Power rates, which could lead to higher residential electricity bills. (Pat Richard/CBC)

    "Residential ratepayers have a lot at stake in this hearing, and somebody should be advocating strictly for their best interests," said Hyslop.

    "The public intervener has to wear many hats, which is a difficult role for her, so I'm at least coming forward. I'll do the best I can if the board rules in my favour."

    For support, Hyslop cited cases he considered to be similar situations, but NB Power lawyer John Furey disagreed they were applicable. 

    Furey didn't have any problem with Hyslop representing residential customers, but he disagreed that NB Power should pay for the work.

    Black, the present intervener, also disagreed with Hyslop, saying she was able to represent both the public and residential customers at the same time.

    Board chair Raymond Gorman says a decision will be made shortly after the June 22 deadline for written responses. (Pat Richard/CBC)

    "I think we need to make clear that just because advancing the public interest is not the same as exclusively representing residential rateplayers, it does not mean that considering the interests of residential ratepayers is not a very significant component of representing public interest," said Black. 

    The Energy and Utilities Board will come to a decision later, with chair Raymond Gorman stressing it was an important decision he didn't want to rush.

    Gorman gave an opportunity to all parties involved to make written comments by June 22 at noon. Gorman said the board's written decision would follow shortly after that.

    About the Author

    Philip Drost is a reporter with CBC New Brunswick.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/eub-peter-hyslop-nbpower-residential-intervener-1.4194478

    Board nixes special intervener to defend residential users in NB Power hearings

    Energy and Utilities Board concludes it does not have authority to appoint a residential intervener

     

    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Jul 07, 2017 12:08 PM AT

     


    Peter Hyslop, a Hartland-based lawyer, had argued he should be appointed as the residential representative to the Energy and Utilities Board during NB Power's rate design hearings. (Pat Richard/CBC News file photo)

    New Brunswick's Energy and Utilities Board has ruled it does not have the authority to order special funding for a lawyer to represent residential electricity users at upcoming NB Power hearings that will reshape how consumers are billed. 

    "The board finds that it does not have jurisdiction to grant intervener funding," it wrote in a three-page decision released late last week.

    NB Power is involved in a rate design hearing, which could dramatically change the prices charged by the utility.

    Peter Hyslop, a Hartland-based lawyer, argued in June that homeowners and apartment dwellers are NB Power's largest customer group and should be independently represented at hearings.

    "Rate design is going to have significant impact on residential ratepayers," Hyslop said at the June 15 meeting. 

    There is no question that Mr. Hyslop would bring a meaningful contribution to the proceedings.
    - Energy and Utilities Board

    "The argument and position of residential ratepayers should be before this board."

    NB Power is responsible for the expenses of electricity hearings and would have been the one to pay for the bills of a lawyer representing residential customers.

    In its decision, the EUB said there is nothing in its governing legislation or in precedent-setting court rulings that allow for that arrangement. 

    "There is no question that Mr. Hyslop would bring a meaningful contribution to the proceedings," it wrote.  

    "However, the board concludes that it cannot be implied that intervener funding is of practical necessity in order to accomplish its jurisdiction."

    Year-long hearing to reshape bills

    Heather Black is the public intervener at the Energy and Utility Board's looking into NB Power's rate design application. (Robert Jones/CBC)

    Hyslop is a former public intervener at NB Power rate hearings. 

    Heather Black, who is now the public intervener, is responsible for representing "the public interest" at the EUB hearings and is barred from advocating for any single group like residential customers.

    Hyslop suggested that mandate, which was changed by the Alward government in 2013, meant Black would be unable to represent the best interests of residential customers in the way public interveners used to.

    NB Power is in the middle of a year-long EUB proceeding that is looking at reshaping how the utility bills various customers for electricity.

    Some of the most significant proposals are aimed at homeowners and apartment dwellers, including higher than average rate increases for that group, premium prices for electric heat and the possible adoption of different rates at different times of the day, different days of the week or different months of the year.

     

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-oil-energy-board-margins-1.5886011

     

    Irving Oil supporters and skeptics lining up on opposite sides of company price hike request

    Energy and Utilities Board holds first hearing into requested wholesale margin increases today


    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Jan 25, 2021 7:26 AM AT

     


    Irving Oil says it needs an 'urgent' increase in petroleum margins to ensure product shortages do not hit consumers. (CBC News file photo)

    An initial hearing into Irving Oil's request for increases in petroleum wholesale prices begins today in front of the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board with supporters raising the stark prospect of the company shutting down if it does not get what it is asking for and skeptics warning the board against being manipulated.

    "We must be cautiously aware that no business is too big to fail," read one letter on the issue received and posted publicly last week by the EUB.

    "They are playing the Board,"  read another about the company's application.

    New Brunswick adopted petroleum price regulation in 2006 and put the Energy and Utilities Board in place to oversee it.  Currently wholesalers are allowed to add 6.51 cents per litre to the price of motor fuels they handle (gasoline and diesel) and 5.5 cents per litre to furnace oil. 

    Irving Oil is applying for a 62.8 per cent (4.09 cent per litre) increase in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels and a 54.9 per cent (3.02 cent per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.

    New Brunswick's Energy and Utilities Board has scheduled a full hearing into Irving Oil's request for wholesale petroleum price increases for March 30. It will hear arguments Monday for and against an emergency interim increase. (Robert Jones/CBC News)

    The increases are substantially more than the 11 per cent growth in inflation that has occurred since the margins last changed in March 2013, but the company says fundamental changes in the oil industry and a sudden collapse in demand for petroleum products caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have rendered those old amounts obsolete.

    "Petroleum pricing regulations in New Brunswick were created 15 years ago," Darren Gillis, Irving Oil chief marketing officer, said in an affidavit supporting the application. "They did not contemplate the challenges of the last several years and were not designed to react to a global pandemic."

    If granted in full, the increases would apply to all New Brunswick wholesalers and would cost consumers about $60 million per year in higher retail prices.

    The Energy and Utilities Board has tentatively scheduled a full hearing into the matter for the end of March, but in its application Irving Oil said its situation is dire and it cannot wait that long for relief. 


    Irving Oil's Darren Gillis is heading the company's effort to have the Energy and Utilities Board approve $60 million in increased petroleum margins for New Brunswick wholesalers. (Irving Oil)

    Instead it is asking for 85 per cent of the requested increase on motor fuels (3.5 cents) and 99 per cent of the increase on furnace oil (3.0 cents) to be granted immediately pending the outcome of the full hearing next spring.

    "The entire supply chain in under pressure and at risk," Gillis said in the application. "COVID-19 has exacerbated challenges for the industry and urgent action is required."

    That tone has alarmed supporters of Irving Oil who fear the company is in trouble. Last week, the company  announced layoffs at its Saint John refinery and worried suppliers have been mobilizing to urge the EUB to grant its request in full.

    Eric Lloyd is president of Sunny Corner Enterprises Inc., an industrial construction firm in Miramichi that does business with Irving Oil.  

    Lloyd wrote to the EUB to say it "must take action to understand the economic forces that are stressing a very important contributor to our economy," and warned it is not "too big to fail" in asking its request be granted.


    Hafsah Mohammad is with the Moncton social justice and climate action group Grassroots NB, one of several groups registered to oppose Irving Oil's application. (Tori Weldon/CBC News)

    Another Irving supplier, Lorneville Mechanical Contractors Ltd. in Saint John, also sent a letter expressing concern about the company's financial health.  

    "We understand that Irving Oil has identified New Brunswick's highly regulated fuel pricing system as a challenge to its ability to operate reliably and sustainably," wrote Lorneville's president Jim Brewer, in endorsing immediate increases.   

    Local building trade unions warned the viability of the refinery itself could hinge on the EUB's decision.

    "It would be devastating to lose this asset," wrote union president Jean-Marc Ringuette in his letter supporting Irving Oil's request.

    But others are skeptical.

    A number of anti-poverty, union and social justice organizations have signed up to oppose Irving Oil's application and a clutch of private citizens, like Saint John resident Mary Milander, also sent letters opposing  the increase.

    "I believe that that the people of Saint John and the whole province have suffered financially much more than the oil industry during the pandemic," Milander wrote to the board.

    Natural Resources and Energy Development Minster Mike Holland stoked early controversy about Irving Oil's request by writing a letter to the Energy and Utilities Board telling it the application should be dealt with quickly. (Radio-Canada)

    Although yet to start, the hearing has already been highly controversial following news last week that New Brunswick Natural Resources Minister Mike Holland sent his own letter to the EUB expressing concerns about Irving Oil's ability to supply products at current prices.

    That led to criticism from all three opposition parties and a call for Holland to resign from Green Party Leader David Coon. Premier Blaine Higgs defended Holland's intervention.

    The EUB has granted interim relief to applicants in other cases before, but normally on the condition money collected from consumers be returned if the increases are later found to be unjustified.

    A complicating factor in Irving Oil's application for immediate relief is that Gillis has acknowledged that other than home heating oil sales, returning money to customers will not be possible.

    "In the unlikely case the permanent increase for motor fuels is lower than the interim increase, Irving Oil cannot effectively and fairly rebate the difference," he said.



     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-oil-wholesale-petroleum-price-1.5887093 

     

    Irving Oil request for 'urgent' wholesale price hike stalls over redacted evidence

    Energy and Utilities Board adjourns to allow groups opposing price increase to argue for access to evidence


    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Jan 25, 2021 5:58 PM AT

     


    Irving Oil Ltd. is applying for a 62.8 per cent (4.09 cent per litre) increase in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels and a 54.9 per cent (3.02 cent per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.   (Devaan Ingraham/Reuters )

    Irving Oil's attempt to win immediate wholesale petroleum price increases from the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board stalled quickly Monday over objections from a variety of community organizations that too much of the application is based on secret material.

    "The amount of information that is redacted in these documents makes it very difficult for our organization to meaningfully participate," said Abram Lutes with the New Brunswick Common Front for Social Justice 

    "It limits our ability to participate meaningfully and to advocate on behalf of low income workers and people in poverty."

    Several other groups expressed similar concerns and the EUB's acting Chair Francois Beaulieu scheduled a hearing Friday morning to deal with the objections. That forced a delay in Irving Oil's request for immediate increases in wholesale petroleum margins at least until next week.


    Francois Beaulieu, acting chair of the Energy and Utilities Board, scheduled a hearing Friday morning to deal with objections to Irving Oil's requests. (Graham Thompson/CBC)

    "The board will adjourn and we'll await the interveners to file their objections," said Beaulieu.

    Until recently, Irving Oil has shown little outward concern about petroleum wholesale margins in New Brunswick. Since 2016, it twice declined to participate in scheduled reviews of the issue by the board, including the latest one launched in 2019.

    COVID-19 has affected business 

    But the company says the COVID-19 pandemic has hit its business hard, and it now requires immediate changes.

    In prepared remarks for the EUB on Monday that he was ultimately unable to deliver before proceedings adjourned Irving Oil marketing president Darren Gillis planned to outline the company's hardships

    "We've reduced spending across the company, cancelled projects, and unfortunately reduced our employee and contractor workforce," said the prepared remarks.

    "Significant sales declines (Jet Fuel, Marine Fuel and Transportation Fuel) and higher costs are having a serious impact on the entire supply chain. No one, no company is insulated from the impacts of the pandemic, including Irving Oil."   

    Company asks for substantial increases 

    The company is applying for a 62.8 per cent (4.09 cent per litre) increase in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels and a 54,9 per cent (3.02 cent per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.  

    It is asking that prior to a full hearing in late March,  85 per cent of the requested increase on motor fuels (3.5 cents) and 99 per cent of the increase on furnace oil (3.0 cents) be granted immediately

    The increases are substantially more than the 11 per cent growth in inflation that has occurred since the margins last changed in March 2013. But much of Irving Oil's evidence in support of changes that large is not being publicly shared to protect company operational and financial information, an immediate sticking point Monday  

    Beaulieu noted the EUB itself along with public intervener Heather Black and any experts they hire are permitted to view all the material, but that did little to satisfy several participants.

    Hafsah Mohammad with the Moncton social justice and climate action group Grassroots NB expressed support for Black's role but said more perspectives on Irving Oil's application are needed 

    "I think that has a problematic element with one person speaking for the entire public," said Mohammad.   

    "I thought that's why there are interveners. If it is solely on Heather Black I am concerned with just one person being assigned to this role."


    Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland wrote a letter to New Brunswick's Energy and Utilities Board, in which he said an Irving Oil application for petroleum price increases should be dealt with quickly. (Radio-Canada)

    Mohammad also pressed Beaulieu to explain his view on a letter sent to the EUB by Mike Holland, the New Brunswick natural resources and energy development minister, and its effect on the hearing..  

    Holland wrote to the board on Jan. 6, one day after Irving Oil filed its application, to back the company's request for an "expedited" review.

    "I did not have any intention to comment on the letter but if an intervener does put it forward I'll comment on it," said Beaulieu.

    "I'm putting it forward," said Mohammad 

    Beaulieu said all citizens have a right to send letters to comment on matters before the board, and he viewed Holland's as just one of many that have arrived from the public.

    Irving oil lawyer concerned over delay

    "Any person in the province of New Brunswick can comment on any proceeding of the board," said Beaulieu  "We're independent and that will continue."

    Irving Oil lawyer Len Hoyt expressed concern about delays in getting to the request for immediate price increases, but the application is effectively on hold for a week while the company's reliance on confidential information is dealt with first

    "The urgency and the expediency of this is of upmost importance to my client." said Hoyt.


     
     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-oil-price-hike-secrecy-1.5896468


    Irving Oil wins right to keep its price hike evidence private

    EUB rules groups fighting the application for petroleum price increases cannot view critical material


    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Feb 01, 2021 4:29 PM AT 

     


    Irving Oil lawyer Len Hoyt successfully argued there is no public benefit to letting groups opposed to the company's application see its evidence. (CBC)

    Opponents of Irving Oil's request to increase petroleum wholesale margins in New Brunswick are vowing to keep up their fight against the application despite a ruling Monday denying them access to most of the evidence the case is based upon. 

    "We're going to continue to carry on," said Abram Lutes.

    Lutes is with the Common Front for Social Justice, one of five community and union groups registered to take part in the hearing into petroleum margins in front of the Energy and Utilities Board that argued for the right to see all the evidence presented.   

    "It will be very difficult to argue the evidence itself when a lot of that substantial information is being withheld," said Lutes, after the ruling denying access was released    

    "It begs the question why have interveners in the first place?"

    Much of Irving Oil's evidence supporting an increase in petroleum margins is redacted to protect company information. The EUB ruled Monday that is reasonable. (Submitted by Irving Oil)

    Irving Oil's marketing and commercial divisions have applied for a 62.8 per cent (4.09 cent per litre) increase in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels, including diesel and gasoline and a 54.9 per cent (3.02 cent per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.  

    It is also asking that prior to a full hearing on that request in late March or early April,  85 per cent of the requested increase on motor fuels (3.5 cents) and 99 per cent of the increase on furnace oil (3.0 cents) be granted immediately because of intense financial pressures it says have arisen in the industry during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Abram Lutes is with the New Brunswick Common Front for Social Justice and says the group will continue to fight Irving Oil's application to raise petroleum wholesale prices despite not being allowed to see the evidence. (CBC)

    The increases are substantially more than the 11 per cent growth in inflation that has occurred since the margins last changed in March 2013, but the company said explaining why will involve sharing commercially sensitive information that it needs to protect from competitors.

    In its decision the board said Irving Oil is entitled to keep internal company information it submits to bolster its case for higher prices off the public record.  

    Acting board chair Francois Beaulieu said Irving Oil's evidence met the definition of what constitutes confidential information.  That requires the board to protect it and the parties opposed to the application will not be allowed to view it.


    Acting EUB chairman Francois Beaulieu delivered the ruling that Irving Oil met the requirement to keep evidence confidential. (CBC)

    Instead, the evidence will be available in its entirety to the board, its professional staff and hired expert as well as to public intervener Heather Black and any expert she retains.  

    He said that will ensure the company's evidence is properly "tested" and should provide enough scrutiny to ensure the public interest is served.

    In previous hearings on other matters the board has sometimes allowed multiple interveners to view confidential information if they sign non disclosure agreements, but Irving Oil made it clear last week it was also opposed to that arrangement.

    "We do have a concern with that, and the only party that we are prepared to provide it to is the Public Intervener in addition to the Board," said Irving Oil's lawyer Len Hoyt on Friday.


    Hafsah Mohammad, left, is with the Moncton community group Grassroots NB and is disappointed by the ruling evidence in Irving Oil's application to raise margins will not be widely shared. (Shane Magee/CBC)

    Hafsah Mohammad represents Garassroots NB and was disappointed with the board's decision but said her group would continue to fight the application.

    "Yes, absolutely," she said.

    "We don't have access to all evidence and we will preface our arguments with that reality."

    The board will meet Thursday to hear Irving Oil's request for an interim increase in allowed wholesale charges to cope with immediate financial pressures it says cannot wait for the full hearing in two months.

    About the Author

    Robert Jones

    Reporter

    Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006. 

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-oil-price-increase-request-1.5903522 

     

    Irving Oil's request for immediate price increases hits wall of opposition at EUB

     

    Public intervener Heather Black joins community and union groups calling for application to be denied

     

    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Feb 05, 2021 6:49 PM AT

     


    In a point-by-point dismantling of Irving Oil's request for interim price increases, public intervener Heather Black said, 'The applicant bears the burden of proof here and the applicant has not satisfied this burden.' (CBC News file photo)

    Irving Oil's effort to win an immediate increase in petroleum wholesale margins hit a wall of opposition in front of the Energy and Utilities Board Friday, with public intervener Heather Black joining a collection of community and union groups in opposing the application.

    "In my view, the applicant's motion should be denied," Black said in a point-by-point dismantling of the company's request for "interim" price increases.

    "The applicant bears the burden of proof here and the applicant has not satisfied this burden."

    Irving Oil's marketing and commercial divisions have applied for an increase of 62.8 per cent (4.09 cents per litre) in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels, including diesel and gasoline, and a 54.9 per cent (3.02 cents per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.  

    On Friday it was also asking that prior to a full hearing on that request scheduled for April, 85 per cent of the increase on motor fuels (3.5 cents) and 99 per cent of the increase on furnace oil (3.0 cents) be granted immediately.

    The immediate increase is necessary, it said, because of financial pressures that have arisen in the industry during the COVID-19 pandemic.


    Darren Gillis, head of Irving Oil's marketing and commercial fuels divisions. At Friday's hearing, Gillis said the company is experiencing intense financial pressure. (Irving Oil file photo)

    Company under financial pressure, exec says

    Darren Gillis, the head of Irving Oil's marketing and commercial fuels divisions, said the company is under intense financial pressure that could interrupt its ability to supply petroleum to New Brunswick customers.

    "Every day matters. Every day is important," said Gillis.

    If granted in full, the requested interim increase would allow all New Brunswick wholesalers to charge about $1 million per week extra for petroleum products.

    Under questioning from Hafsah Mohammad of the Moncton social justice and climate action group Grassroots NB, Gillis told the hearing the combination of no increases in wholesale margins since 2013 and a pandemic-driven drop in demand for petroleum products is causing the company significant trouble.

    "We can no longer continue to absorb those costs, especially so in a worldwide pandemic," he said.


    Hafsah Mohammad of Grassroots NB, who joined the hearing by Zoom, questioned Irving Oil on the specific causes of the financial trouble the company says it is experiencing. (Robert Jones/CBC News)

    Acting EUB chair François Beaulieu asked why, if an emergency has developed inside the oil industry in New Brunswick, none of the three dozen other wholesalers in the province are publicly expressing support for Irving's call for increases. 

    "What puzzles me is we haven't received one letter of comment  from a wholesaler that supports your application," Beaulieu said.

    "Why should the board grant an increase if there is nobody else in this province, no other wholesalers, that support your request?"

    Company lawyer Len Hoyt dismissed that concern, saying letters of support are of no evidentiary value.

    He said that if other oil companies had written to the board, Irving Oil would be accused of orchestrating the effort.

    "I really don't think you can take from the fact that there are no letters of comment filed by wholesalers that no wholesaler supports the application," Hoyt said.

    No evidence offered of threat to supply, Black says

    In her argument, Black listed a number of reasons to reject the application for immediate price hikes.

    She said that although a threat to the supply of petroleum products in New Brunswick would qualify for interim increases, the company failed to offer direct evidence to support that such a threat exists, other than its own statements.  

    "I submit that the applicant in this case has not established whether or to what extent the current margin is squeezing wholesalers so much that it jeopardizes supply," Black said.

    In addition, she said confidential cost information submitted by the company is not sufficiently detailed to separate out increases that apply to wholesalers from increases that might apply to the refinery, which is not covered by regulation.

    She also noted that the company supplied no sales data to show how its business volumes have changed during the pandemic to support its claim of harm. 
     
    "Generally the evidence is composed of broad statements about the petroleum industry as a whole, the effects of regulation in general and the effects of the pandemic on the larger Irving Oil entity," said Black. 

    "There's nothing specific in the narrative about wholesalers." 

    In addition to those shortcomings, Black said the company's admission that it has no way to rebate motorists who are charged an interim increase if the increase is later found to be unjustified in a full hearing is a fatal flaw in the application.

    "In my view, without the ability to rebate any over-collection, the board cannot grant the increase," she said.

    Also opposing the application for interim increases were the community groups Grassroots NB, The Common Front for Social Justice, Leap4wards and Fredericton Solidarity, as well as the Canadian Union of Public Employees.

    The EUB reserved decision in the matter.

    About the Author

    Robert Jones

    Reporter

    Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.

     

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/irving-request-denied-eub-1.5917204

     

    Rejected:  Irving Oil request for immediate petroleum price hikes denied by energy board

     

    Company needed to meet one of two tests to qualify for interim increases but fell short on both.

     

    Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: Feb 17, 2021 3:36 PM AT

     


    Irving Oil Ltd. had requested an immediate increase in wholesale margins ahead of an April hearing to mitigate financial pressures brought on by the pandemic. (Devaan Ingraham/Reuters)

    In a firm rejection of Irving Oil's request for urgent increases in petroleum wholesale margins, New Brunswick's Energy and Utilities Board ruled Wednesday that the company will have to wait for a full hearing in April to argue its case.

    "The board concludes the applicants have not met the principles to be applied for an interim order," said acting EUB chair Francois Beaulieu during a twenty minute reading of the board's decision.

    "The motion is therefore denied."

    In January, Irving Oil's marketing and commercial divisions applied for a 62.8 per cent (4.09 cent per litre) increase in the allowed wholesale margin for motor fuels, including diesel and gasoline and a 54.9 per cent (3.02 cent per litre) increase in the margin for furnace oil.  

    In addition, the company asked that prior to a full hearing on its request in April,  85 per cent of the increase on motor fuels (3.5 cents) and 99 per cent of the increase on furnace oil (3.0 cents) be granted immediately because of intense financial pressures it says have arisen in the industry during the COVID-19 pandemic..

    A hearing on that request was held earlier this month and on Wednesday, after 12 days of deliberation, the board said no.


    EUB acting chair Francois Beaulieu said Irving Oil did not meet 'the principles to be applied for an interim order' and denied the request by the company. (Graham Thompson/CBC)

    In the decision, Beaulieu said the two Irving Oil companies asking for the immediate increases needed to meet one of two requirements to qualify, but satisfied neither.

    He said the company needed to offer evidence that waiting for a full hearing and decision on the main application would involve a "significant delay" or alternatively that waiting any length of time for increases would have a "deleterious impact" on the company and its ability to supply petroleum products.

    Beaulieu said with a full hearing scheduled for late April, a decision is likely in May, which did not meet the definition of a significant delay. In addition, he said the company offered no solid evidence to show its financial circumstances are dire.

    "The board has no conclusive evidence of any serious apprehended financial difficulties caused by the current duration of this proceeding on the applicants," said Beaulieu.

    "The board concludes that the applicants have not established that the current wholesale margin for motor fuels and furnace oil are such that security of supply would be jeopardized during the period between its application and the likely timeframe of the board's final decision in this matter."  


    Abram Lutes is with the New Brunswick Common Front for Social Justice, an intervener in the hearings, and applauds the EUB decision. (CBC)

    Irving Oil Ltd. did not immediately respond for comment on the decision.

    Several community and union groups had intervened in the case to oppose the increases and appeared almost surprised they had won.

    "I have a lot more faith in the process for sure," said Hafsah Mohammed with the Moncton climate action and social justice group Grassroots NB.

    "I think this gives a lot of people hope that our society's checks and balances are in working order."

    Abram Lutes, with the New Brunswick Common Front for Social Justice, also applauded the ruling.  

    "We're very pleased," said Lutes.

    "It shows the board is taking public scrutiny of this process seriously."

    About the Author

    Robert Jones

    Reporter

    Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006. 

     

     

     

    93 Comments


    David Amos
    Surprise Surprise Surprise
     
     
     
     
    David White
    I wonder if layoffs will start in retaliation until the Government gives in? 
     
     
    David White 
    Reply to @David White: I mean the EUB under pressure from the Gov.
     
     
    Welly Smith
    Reply to @David White: In afew months we'll be back to normal....
     
     
    Terry Tibbs
    Reply to @David White:
    Didn't they already try that with a letter from the energy minister?
     
     
    David Amos
    Reply to @Terry Tibbs: FYI ALL of the EUB are liberal appointees except the questionable lawyer they are using lately

    Legislative committee to debate virtual meetings of the legislature

    $
    0
    0

     

     

     

     

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/legislative-colegislative-committee-to-debate-virtual-meetings-of-the-legismmittee-to-discuss-virtual-meetings-1.5915922

     

    Legislative committee to debate virtual meetings of the legislature

    Opposition parties argue some MLAs could attend virtually during pandemic, education minister opposes idea

     
    Jacques Poitras· CBC News· Posted: Feb 16, 2021 5:08 PM AT
     
     

    Opposition parties have pushed for the ability to attend meetings of the Legislature virtually. (Twitter/David Coon)

    A committee of MLAs will debate on Friday whether the New Brunswick Legislature should adopt virtual or hybrid sittings as a way of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Green Party Leader David Coon introduced a motion Tuesday to force the committee to deal with the issue, which flared up last week and derailed the early passage of several government bills.

    MLAs have been holding hybrid committee meetings for months, with some MLAs taking part virtually using videoconferencing technology.

    But so far, sittings of the full legislature are not allowed to use the same system because of objections from Education and Early Childhood Development Minister Dominic Cardy. 

    On Friday, Cardy said he would oppose going against "hundreds of years of history" and parliamentary tradition that he says requires MLAs to debate issues and vote on legislation in person.


    Green Party Leader David Coon made a motion before the committee on procedure, privileges and legislative officers to allow for virtual meetings of the legislature. (Jacques Poitras/CBC News file photo)

    He said those traditions outweigh the risk of MLAs travelling between health zones in red and orange phases to be in the legislature in person. 

    To protest Cardy's resistance, the Liberals and the Greens refused to give unanimous support Friday to a Progressive Conservative attempt to fast-track four government bills and a private member's bill. 

    Glen Savoie, the PC House leader, said that rather than obstruct government business, the opposition parties should raise the virtual-sittings issue at a meeting of the committee on procedure, privileges and legislative officers.

    That committee met Tuesday and Coon's motion called on members "to draft proposed changes" to house rules "by which the House may conduct hybrid and virtual proceeding" and to send its recommendations to the legislature by March 17. 


    Education Minister Dominic Cardy opposes virtual meetings of the legislature during the COVID-19 pandemic, even though his own leader has agreed the idea could work. (Submitted by the Government of New Brunswick)

    PC MLAs amended the motion to simply say the committee would "discuss" virtual sittings at its next meeting this Friday.

    Cardy's adamant opposition to virtual sittings is at odds with Premier Blaine Higgs himself, who pointed out Friday the legislature has the technology in place to operate virtually.

    "If it becomes a heightened concern because of the pandemic, not being able to conduct the business of the province is not an option, so we have to find a solution, and we will," he said. 

    About the Author

    Jacques Poitras

    Provincial Affairs reporter

    Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. Raised in Moncton, he also produces the CBC political podcast Spin Reduxit.

     
     
     
     
     
    23 Comments
    Commenting is now closed for this story. 


    View your notifications
    David Amos
    All these clowns know for certain is that everybody loves a circus
     
     

    Randy McNally
    Reply to @David Amos: "Clowns to the left of me Jokers to the right"
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Reply to @Randy McNally: Here I am stuck in the middle with you 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    Graham McCormack
    Time for Higgs to show Cardy who's in charge. Cardy has no problem telling teachers and students to work remotely, going against centuries of traditions.

    The guys is such a tool.
     
     
     
    Randy McNally
    Reply to @Graham McCormack: ...and the letter "f" is always interchangeable with the letter "t"
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos
    Content deactivated 
    Reply to @Randy McNally: Kinda like the century's of parliamentary tradition of certain clowns transforming butter tarts into butter farts while they spew BS in narcissistic fashion as if whatever sounds they make is important enough to become the law of the land.
     
     
    View your notifications
    David Amos 
    Reply to @Graham McCormack: Ask yourself why he doesn't

     

     

     

    Viewing all 3475 articles
    Browse latest View live