Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all 3623 articles
Browse latest View live

Re The Latest NEB pipeline game in NB with the Irvings, the Indians, the Unions, the Green Meanies and various lawsuits etc Obviously I did run for public office while arguing the CROWN EH Brian Gallant and Teddy Fleming???

$
0
0
GmailDavid Amos

Re The Latest NEB pipeline game in NB with the Irvings, the Indians, the Unions, the Green Meanies and various lawsuits etc Obviously I did run for public office while arguing the CROWN EH Brian Gallant and Teddy Fleming???

David Amos Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:34 PM
larc@sasktel.net, marc_bernard@live.com, marcelwhite1987@gmail.com,
dallasmcquarrie@gmail.com, grammawilli@gmail.com,
lorrainetootoo4life@gmail.compmoist@cupe.ca, COCMoncton@gmail.com,
oldmaison@yahoo.com,
inrexton2013@yahoo.ca, jimemberger@yahoo.com,
peter.dauphinee@gmail.com, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca,
john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
ddesserud@upei.ca, ddarrow@gov.ns.ca, larrykowalchuk@kowalchuklaw.ca,
dan.murphy@nbliberal.ca,
 mckeen.randy@gmail.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
upriverwatch@gmail.com, mboling <mboling@swn.com>,
Davidc.Coon@gmail.com, info@coalitionavenirquebec.org>,
pknoll@corridor.ca, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
almabrooks26@hotmail.com, sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca,
info@gg.ca, COCMoncton@gmail.com, markandcaroline@gmail.com, willi@iicph.org,
 john.logan@gnb.ca,
 sunrayzulu@shaw.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, <premier@gnb.ca>,
Brian Gallant <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>, don.darling@saintjohn.ca,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:20:33 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Re Anti Frackers etc Interesting lawsuits EH Teddy
Fleming??? Should I intervene or just run for public office AGAIN
To: larc@sasktel.net
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.noshalegasnb.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Statement-of-Claim-website-version.pdf

Kowalchuk Law Office
Business Address: 101 – 2222 Albert Street
Regina, Saskatchewan S4P 2V2
Telephone: (306) 522-2606
Fax: (306) 522-2608
Email: larc@sasktel.net


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 10:12:16 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Re Anti Frackers etc Interesting lawsuits EH Teddy
Fleming??? Should I intervene or just run for public office AGAIN
To: marc_bernard@live.com, marcelwhite1987@gmail.com,
dallasmcquarrie@gmail.com, grammawilli@gmail.com,
lorrainetootoo4life@gmail.com, pmoist <pmoist@cupe.ca>, COCMoncton
<COCMoncton@gmail.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
inrexton2013@yahoo.ca, jimemberger@yahoo.com, "peter.dauphinee"
<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "bruce.northrup"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "roger.l.brown"
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.warr"<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/your-buddy-elvis-of-swn-and-you-should.html

http://www.ernstversusencana.ca/22-community-groups-and-three-citizens-sue-new-brunswick-government-over-future-of-fracing-statement-of-claim-alleges-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms-violations

For more information, contact NBASGA Spokespersons:
Jim Emberger – (English)
Tel: (506) 440-4255
Email: jimemberger@yahoo.com

Denise Melanson (French)
Tel: 506-523-9467
Email: inrexton2013@yahoo.ca

https://nbharbinger.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/moncton-fracking-suit/

Lorraine Clair (506) 523-8291 <lorrainetootoo4life@gmail.com>
Marcel White (506) 785-4660 <marcelwhite1987@gmail.com>
Marc Bernard (Français) (506) 875-6364 <marc_bernard@live.com>
Dallas McQuarrie 506-876-4431<dallasmcquarrie@gmail.com>
Willi Nolan  (506) 785-4660 <grammawilli@gmail.com>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 08:26:25 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: Re Anti Frackers etc Interesting lawsuits EH Teddy
Fleming??? Should I intervene or just run for public office AGAIN
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, Tim RICHARDSON
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, ddesserud
<ddesserud@upei.ca>, ddarrow <ddarrow@gov.ns.ca>,
larrykowalchuk@kowalchuklaw.ca, dan murphy <dan.murphy@nbliberal.ca>,
"mckeen.randy"<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "mclaughlin.heather"
<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>,
"david.alward"<david.alward@gnb.ca>, swnnb@swn.com, upriverwatch
<upriverwatch@gmail.com>, mboling <mboling@swn.com>, "Davidc.Coon"
<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, info <info@coalitionavenirquebec.org>, pknoll
<pknoll@corridor.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, almabrooks26
<almabrooks26@hotmail.com>, sallybrooks25 <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>,
info <info@gg.ca>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, markandcaroline
<markandcaroline@gmail.com>, willi <willi@iicph.org>,
"Bernard.Valcourt.c1"<Bernard.Valcourt.c1@parl.gc.ca>,
"roger.l.brown"<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "john.logan"<john.logan@gnb.ca>, hugh
flemming <hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, Brian
Gallant <briangallant@nbliberal.ca>

Why not David? No one voted for you before and no will this time. Can
you afford to lose the deposit?

Be advised everyone Gracie Amos gives great head for twenty bucks in
Fredericton.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: larrykowalchuk@kowalchuklaw.ca, "dan murphy"
<dan.murphy@nbliberal.ca>, "mckeen.randy"<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>,
"mclaughlin.heather"<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>,
"acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>, "david.alward"<david.alward@gnb.ca>,
swnnb@swn.com, "upriverwatch"<upriverwatch@gmail.com>, "mboling"
<mboling@swn.com>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, "info"
<info@coalitionavenirquebec.org>, "pknoll"<pknoll@corridor.ca>,
"Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "oldmaison"
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "almabrooks26"<almabrooks26@hotmail.com>,
"sallybrooks25"<sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, "info"<info@gg.ca>,
"COCMoncton"<COCMoncton@gmail.com>, "markandcaroline"
<markandcaroline@gmail.com>, "willi"<willi@iicph.org>,
"Bernard.Valcourt.c1"<Bernard.Valcourt.c1@parl.gc.ca>,
"roger.l.brown"<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "john.logan"<john.logan@gnb.ca>,
"sunrayzulu"<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "hugh flemming"
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "premier"<premier@gnb.ca>, "Brian Gallant"
<briangallant@nbliberal.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Tim RICHARDSON"
<Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "ddesserud"
<ddesserud@upei.ca>, "ddarrow"<ddarrow@gov.ns.ca>
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2014 6:32:37 AM
Subject: Re Anti Frackers etc Interesting lawsuits EH Teddy Fleming???
Should I intervene or just run for public office AGAIN


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/peoples-lawsuit-launched-over-shale-gas-1.2688739

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/anti-shale-gas-group-suing-new-brunswick-government-1.2684758

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/your-buddy-elvis-of-swn-and-you-should.html

http://kowalchuklaw.ca/staff.html

Larry Kowalchuk
Lawyer

LLB, BA

(306) 522-2606
larrykowalchuk@kowalchuklaw.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 05:09:05 -0300
Subject: Whilst Matty Baby Hayes enjoys his summer days with Tracy and
Chucky Dr Anthony R Ingraffea's sabbatic leave should be over and
maybe he will read my emails now EH Ms Linke?
To: linkejul@gmail.com, ari1@cornell.edu, news@kingscorecord.com,
concernedcitizensofpenobsquis@yahoo.ca, ralph.carr@sussex.ca,
mhayes@stu.ca, andre@jafaust.com, markandcaroline@gmail.com
Cc: t.wishart@banfrackingnb.ca, jlpdev@nbnet.nb.ca,
kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWPd9ihOfdU&feature=player_embedded#!

http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.ca/2012/05/fredericton-mayoral-candidate-matthew_21.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:27:57 -0300
Subject: I tried to call Mayor "Sonny" about Fracking, Money,
Municipal elections and Public Corruption
To: marilyn.price@nb.aibn.com

He never called me back Perhaps his unnamed laywer should answer me in
writing now?

http://www.doaktown.com/village-office/village-staff

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 22:20:05 -0300
Subject: I just called about Fracking, Money, Municipal elections and
Public Corruption
To: acimediagroup@nb.aibn.com
Cc: mhayes <mhayes@stu.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, markandcaroline
<markandcaroline@gmail.com>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/04/26/nb-shale-gas-doaktown-debate-632.html

Thursday April 26, 2012
Doaktown elections
Posted by Kevin Shaw

Stan Donovan was certain candidates for office in Doaktown would be
eager to share their views on all issues at a public forum, then he
ran into fracking.

STANLEY M DONOVAN
(506) 365-7860

Doaktown,  NB

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/04/26/nb-bathurst-mayoral-race.html

James Risdon.
1050 Smith Street.
Bathurst, New Brunswick.
E2A 3V2.
(506) 545-7192
acimediagroup@nb.aibn.com



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 11:01:21 -0300
Subject: RE Windsor Energy Didn't I say i smelled something and that I
am big on family names especially big family names
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Cc: maritme_malaise <maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca>

Just so ya know here two Robert Jones' one as you know works for CBC
and the other is a VP of Transcana in charge of the Keystone Pipeline
Project. One thinks he is a Gas Guru merely because he copied how a
Newfy Taxi driver calculated the price of gas by watching the prices
of oil in the Big Apple. One thinks he knows everthing but still
checks my work for scoops and the other does know who I am if only
because of my conversations with.

http://gasandoil.blogspot.com/2007/06/go-light-on-golden-stuff-gasoline-to.html

This is too sick and sad and funny at the same time. Pissed off folks
have lots to say but not one of them will listen to me.

Just wait until Windsor or SWN or Petroworth or who cause something
like this to happen in "The Place to BE". Your name will be Mudd then
N'esy Pas? Wereas you retend to be mad at your buddies in Windsor
lately for the benefit of Ralphy Carr and the nasty little liberal
bastard Mark Wright please enjoy not reading this email. However rest
assured other folks here there and everywhere will sooner or later. It
appears that some people ithin the Occupy whatever crowd are begining
to check my work.

http://www.earthworksaction.org/clarkwyoming.cfm

http://ruffinprevost.posterous.com/blowout-prompting-closer-look-at-windsor-ener

http://www.earthworksaction.org/PR_ClarkWindsor.cfm

http://www.facebook.com/BanFrackingNB/posts/212676968797881



There is more to Windsor than just Water and Gas. These folks are
pissed about the SAND they take from them.

http://www.everythingredwing.com/nosand/

Another funny part is the Yankees discovered the folks in Norton that
Windsor pissed off last year. Yet I bet one group does not have the
first clue about the other even though they have a common foe and that
foe's lawyers know everything about all of them except who the hell we
are.

http://www.everythingredwing.com/nosand/blog/?p=97

This research by ordinary Yankee folk is interesting and informative
but they get stuck on Steven E. West

http://www.everythingredwing.com/nosand/Who_Is_Windsor_Permian.htm

Their findings about Windsor Energy LLC being by controlled by Wexford
is correct and supported by a SEC filing. However the big daddies
Shell and Windsor Energy Group are mentioned as well.

http://www.faqs.org/sec-filings/110314/GULFPORT-ENERGY-CORP_10-K/

The Permian Basin area covers a significant portion of western Texas
and eastern New Mexico and is considered one of the major producing
basins in the United States. The terrain in the Permian Basin is
semi-arid mesquite-mixed grassland steppe. Windsor Energy LLC, an
entity controlled by Wexford, is the operator of this field.


The availability of a ready market for any oil and/or natural gas we
produce depends on numerous factors beyond the control of our
management, including but not limited to the demand for oil and
natural gas and the level of domestic production and imports of oil,
the proximity and capacity of gas pipelines, the availability of
skilled labor, materials and equipment, the effect of state and
federal regulation of oil and natural gas production and federal
regulation of gas sold in interstate commerce. The oil and natural gas
we produce in Louisiana is sold to purchasers who service the areas
where our wells are located. We sell the majority of our oil to Shell
Trading Company, or Shell. Shell takes custody of the oil at the
outlet from our oil storage barge. Our production from WCBB, other
than the production sold under forward sales contracts, is being sold
in accordance with the Shell posted price for West Texas/New Mexico
Intermediate crude plus or minus Platt’s trade month average P+ value,
plus or minus the Platt’s HLS/WTI trade month average differential
less $2.70 per barrel for transportation. During 2010, we sold 75% and
19% of our oil production to Shell and Windsor Energy Group, the
operator of our Permian wells, respectively, and 50%, 32%, and 10% of
our natural gas production to Windsor Energy Group, Chevron and
Hilcorp Energy Company, respectively. During 2009, we sold 92% and 7%
of our oil production to Shell and Windsor Energy Group, the operator
of our Permian wells, respectively, and 45%, 38%, and 16% of our
natural gas production to Windsor Energy Group, Chevron and Hilcorp
Energy Company, respectively. During 2008, we sold 87% of our oil
production to Shell and 11% to Windsor Energy Group, 100% of our
natural gas liquids production to Windsor Energy Group, and 60%, 22%,
and 16% of our natural gas production to Chevron, Windsor Energy
Group, and Hilcorp Energy Company, respectively. We may not continue
to have ready access to suitable markets for our future oil and
natural gas production.

Oil and natural gas prices can be extremely volatile and are subject
to substantial seasonal, political and other fluctuations. The price
at which the oil and natural gas we produce may be sold is uncertain
and it is possible that under some market conditions the production
and sale of oil and natural gas from some or all of our properties may
not be economical. Because of all of the factors influencing the price
of oil and natural gas, it is impossible to accurately predict future
prices.

To mitigate the effects of commodity price fluctuations, we were party
to forward sales contracts for the sale of 3,000 barrels of WCBB
production per day at a weighted average daily price of $54.81 per
barrel, before transportation costs and differentials, for the period
January 2010 through February 2010. For the period March 2010 through
December 2010, we were party to forward sales contracts for the sale
of 2,300 barrels of WCBB production per day at a weighted average
daily price of $58.24 per barrel before transportation costs and
differentials. We delivered approximately 45% of our 2010 production
under these agreements.

In November 2010, we entered into fixed price swaps for 2,000 barrels
of oil per day at a weighted average price of $86.96 per barrel,
before transportation costs and differentials, for the period January
2011 through December 2011. Under the 2011 contracts, we have
committed to deliver approximately 30% to 33% of our estimated 2011
production. Such arrangements may expose us to risk of financial loss
in certain circumstances, including instances where production is less
than expected or oil prices increase. These forward sales contacts and
fixed price swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges and recorded
at fair value pursuant to FASB ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” and
related pronouncements.

Wexford Capital LP
Wexford Plaza
411 West Putnam Avenue
Greenwich, CT 06830

So how about this House of Windsor?

http://www.iapscience.com/etess_en.php

Interesting bunch

http://www.iapscience.com/directors_en.php

Check the Board of Directors of these dudes too

http://www.meconsult.co.uk/



Small wonder the Kalid Amin the local Chief Cook and bottlewasher for
Windsor with the Saudi sounding name talks so snobish about how well
heeled the big money dudes are behind him. Perhaps there is a reason
why the ROYAL cops are guarding  and his cohorts' assets. It looks to
mean old me they are guarding the Queen's arse too.

http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2011/10/20/windsor-energys-ceo/

However this dude is the most interesting of all. Who said dead men
don't tell tales?

Sir David Gore Booth, (deceased 2004) Chairman of the Windsor Energy
Group was a Foreign Office high-flier who was a colourful Ambassador
to Saudi Arabia and High Commissioner in India. His time in Saudi
Arabia had introduced him to the Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking
Corporation (HSBC), which managed the Saudi British Bank. They invited
him to join the group as special adviser to the chairman. He took to
his new career with zeal and aptitude and was soon on the board of
several of the group's affiliates, travelling widely and often to
various meetings.

http://www.faqs.org/sec-filings/110314/GULFPORT-ENERGY-CORP_10-K/

The Permian Basin area covers a significant portion of western Texas
and eastern New Mexico and is considered one of the major producing
basins in the United States. The terrain in the Permian Basin is
semi-arid mesquite-mixed grassland steppe. Windsor Energy LLC, an
entity controlled by Wexford, is the operator of this field.


The availability of a ready market for any oil and/or natural gas we
produce depends on numerous factors beyond the control of our
management, including but not limited to the demand for oil and
natural gas and the level of domestic production and imports of oil,
the proximity and capacity of gas pipelines, the availability of
skilled labor, materials and equipment, the effect of state and
federal regulation of oil and natural gas production and federal
regulation of gas sold in interstate commerce. The oil and natural gas
we produce in Louisiana is sold to purchasers who service the areas
where our wells are located. We sell the majority of our oil to Shell
Trading Company, or Shell. Shell takes custody of the oil at the
outlet from our oil storage barge. Our production from WCBB, other
than the production sold under forward sales contracts, is being sold
in accordance with the Shell posted price for West Texas/New Mexico
Intermediate crude plus or minus Platt’s trade month average P+ value,
plus or minus the Platt’s HLS/WTI trade month average differential
less $2.70 per barrel for transportation. During 2010, we sold 75% and
19% of our oil production to Shell and Windsor Energy Group, the
operator of our Permian wells, respectively, and 50%, 32%, and 10% of
our natural gas production to Windsor Energy Group, Chevron and
Hilcorp Energy Company, respectively. During 2009, we sold 92% and 7%
of our oil production to Shell and Windsor Energy Group, the operator
of our Permian wells, respectively, and 45%, 38%, and 16% of our
natural gas production to Windsor Energy Group, Chevron and Hilcorp
Energy Company, respectively. During 2008, we sold 87% of our oil
production to Shell and 11% to Windsor Energy Group, 100% of our
natural gas liquids production to Windsor Energy Group, and 60%, 22%,
and 16% of our natural gas production to Chevron, Windsor Energy
Group, and Hilcorp Energy Company, respectively. We may not continue
to have ready access to suitable markets for our future oil and
natural gas production.

Oil and natural gas prices can be extremely volatile and are subject
to substantial seasonal, political and other fluctuations. The price
at which the oil and natural gas we produce may be sold is uncertain
and it is possible that under some market conditions the production
and sale of oil and natural gas from some or all of our properties may
not be economical. Because of all of the factors influencing the price
of oil and natural gas, it is impossible to accurately predict future
prices.

To mitigate the effects of commodity price fluctuations, we were party
to forward sales contracts for the sale of 3,000 barrels of WCBB
production per day at a weighted average daily price of $54.81 per
barrel, before transportation costs and differentials, for the period
January 2010 through February 2010. For the period March 2010 through
December 2010, we were party to forward sales contracts for the sale
of 2,300 barrels of WCBB production per day at a weighted average
daily price of $58.24 per barrel before transportation costs and
differentials. We delivered approximately 45% of our 2010 production
under these agreements.

In November 2010, we entered into fixed price swaps for 2,000 barrels
of oil per day at a weighted average price of $86.96 per barrel,
before transportation costs and differentials, for the period January
2011 through December 2011. Under the 2011 contracts, we have
committed to deliver approximately 30% to 33% of our estimated 2011
production. Such arrangements may expose us to risk of financial loss
in certain circumstances, including instances where production is less
than expected or oil prices increase. These forward sales contacts and
fixed price swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges and recorded
at fair value pursuant to FASB ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging,” and
related pronouncements.



----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <t.wishart@banfrackingnb.ca>; <crwolpin@xplornet.com>;
<appsolca@yahoo.ca>; <jlpdev@nbnet.nb.ca>
Cc: "kirk. macdonald"<kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>; "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>; <jonesr@cbc.ca>; "mclaughlin.heather"
<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>; "news"
<news@kingscorecord.com>; "tips"<tips@nytimes.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 9:21 PM
Subject: Fwd: Dr. Ingraffea I enjoyed your presentations about
fracking in New Brunswick Its too bad that your friends did not
introduce us


http://www.nben.ca/en/collaborative-action/news-from-groups/itemlist/user/169-terrywishart

Media Contacts:

Our Environment, Our Choice, Denise Melanson: 523-9467

Quality of Life Initiative, Otty Forgrave: 839-2326

CCNB Action, Stephanie Merrill: 261-8317

Ban Fracking NB, Terri Telasco: 866-7658

New Brunswickers Against Fracking, Mary de La Valette: 369-1995

Council of Canadians, St. John Chapter, Carol Ring: 847-0953

Grand Lake Watershed Guardians, Amy Sullivan: 339-1980 or 339-5324

Sierra Club Atlantic, Hazel Richardson: 452-8915

Jean Louis Deveau 506 442 1413

Julia Linke 506 367 0987

Terry Wishart 506 238 4001

Carl Wolpin: 506 832-7827

Chris Rendell:  506 832-4660


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 20:02:57 -0400
Subject: Ralph Carr, Bruce Northrup and David Coon know why I won't
hold my breath waiting for a response from Dr Ingraffea
To: ARI1@cornell.edu, thepurplevioletpress
<thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>, concernedcitizensofpenobsquis
<concernedcitizensofpenobsquis@yahoo.ca>, "ralph.carr"
<ralph.carr@sussex.ca>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, linkejul <linkejul@gmail.com>, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "davidc.coon"
<davidc.coon@gmail.com>, water <water@ccnbaction.ca>

From: Anthony R Ingraffea <ari1@cornell.edu>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 23:52:38 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Dr. Ingraffea I enjoyed your presentations
about fracking in New Brunswick Its too bad that your friends did not
introduce us
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Hi,
Please note that I am on sabbatic leave until July 1, 2012.  I might
not be able to access email all the time, and I certainly will be
slower to respond in most cases.  I hope you understand.

Best regards,
Tony

On 12/7/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.cee.cornell.edu/people/profile.cfm?netid=ari1
>
> I especialy liked your comment about Corridor Resources and Potash
> Corp's work in Penosquis being stupid.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jdxg-Jen4K4
>
> FYI I have the same problem with trying to talk to this lady this week.
>
> Here is why I called her
>
> http://www.nben.ca/en/my-nb-eco-community/events/viewevent/283-Shale+Gas+Speaker+Series%3A+Jessica+Ernst
>
> http://www.bctwa.org/FrkBC-Ernst-PrRel-Apr%2026-2011.pdf
>
> Look my words quoted by the newspaper years ago and campare them to
> the words in Nasser's letter that is atttached.
>
> "What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
> the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
> name a few.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 07:46:04 -0400
> Subject: RE Harper, the CBC, Daniel Tobok, BHP Billiton and China
> versus me old me
> To: dtobok@digitalwyzdom.com, "greg.weston"<greg.weston@cbc.ca>, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Clemet1 <Clemet1@parl.gc.ca>, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
> corporate.relations@potashcorp.com
> Cc: Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com, jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com,
> "jacques.nasser"<jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com>, water
> <water@ccnbaction.ca>, "jonesr@cbc.ca"<jonesr@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier
> <premier@gov.sk.ca>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>
>
> Too too funny EH Jac?
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2010/09/15/china-potashcorp.html
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/m/rich/politics/story/2011/11/29/pol-weston-hacking-firms.html
>
> http://www.digitalwyzdom.com/corporate_management.html
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)"<Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
> Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
>
> Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
> Billiton
>
> Susan Collins
> Company Secretariat
> BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
> T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
> E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.comjane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com
>
>
>  <>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
>> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
>> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp.com;
>> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
>> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
>> tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com; nmiller@corridor.ca;
>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
>> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
>> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com;
>> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
>> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
>> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
>> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
>> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
>> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
>> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
>> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>>
>> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
>> issues again about  theexploitation of our natural resources to a
>> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
>> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
>> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
>> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
>> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
>> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
>> now)
>>
>> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
>> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
>> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
>> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
>> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>
>
> This message and any attached files may contain information that is
> confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
> by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
> the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
> recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
> that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
> is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
> therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete the message.
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location  Visit Detail
> Visit 24,639
> Domain Name   gc.ca ? (Canada)
> IP Address   131.137.245.# (Defence Research Establishment-Ottawa)
> ISP   Defense Research Establishment
> Location   Continent  :  North America
> Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
> State/Region  :  Ontario
> City  :  Ottawa
> Lat/Long  :  45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
> Language   English (Canada) en-ca
> Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
> Browser   Internet Explorer 7.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; InfoPath.1; .NET
> CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
> 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
> Javascript   version 1.3
> Monitor   Resolution  :  1280 x 1024
> Color Depth  :  32 bits
> Time of Visit   Dec 6 2011 1:15:10 am
> Last Page View   Dec 6 2011 1:15:10 am
> Visit Length   0 seconds
> Page Views   1
> Referring URL  http://www.google.ca...0l5l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0
> Search Engine  google.ca
> Search Words  david amos
> Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....liberal-premier.html
> Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....liberal-premier.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone   UTC-7:00
> Visitor's Time   Dec 5 2011 5:15:10 pm
> Visit Number   24,639
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>> From: "McKnight, Gisele"
>>>>>> To:
>>>>>> Cc:
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
>>>>>> Subject: David Amos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Lisa,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he
>>>>>> became an independent (not representing any political party)
>>>>>> candidate
>>>>>> in our federal election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in
>>>>>> our constituency of Fundy (now called Fundy-Royal).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates.
>>>>>> That
>>>>>> story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story,
>>>>>> written by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> report on the candidates' debate held June 18.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
>>>>>> The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358. I have attached the
>>>>>> two stories that appeared, as well as a photo taken by reporter Erin
>>>>>> Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo that ran, but
>>>>>> this one is very similar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gisele McKnight editor
>>>>>> Kings County Record
>>>>>> Sussex, New Brunswick
>>>>>> Canada
>>>>>> 506-433-1070
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd
>>>>>> By Erin Hatfield
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
>>>>>> world is all screwed up, rearrange it."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
>>>>>> the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
>>>>>> watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
>>>>>> unofficial, theme song for the debate.
>>>>>> The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but
>>>>>> as
>>>>>> they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
>>>>>> Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the
>>>>>> blue
>>>>>> chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's
>>>>>> Liberalswent
>>>>>> left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
>>>>>> mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row
>>>>>> towards
>>>>>> the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.
>>>>>> The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
>>>>>> organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a
>>>>>> barrage
>>>>>> of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
>>>>>> and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
>>>>>> responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
>>>>>> exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
>>>>>> Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
>>>>>> other on their answers and criticizing eachothers’ party leaders.
>>>>>> Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
>>>>>> questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of
>>>>>> comic
>>>>>> relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
>>>>>> response to the question of the national gun registry. "Nobody's
>>>>>> getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
>>>>>> party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
>>>>>> well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I
>>>>>> am
>>>>>> on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
>>>>>> places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
>>>>>> shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
>>>>>> one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
>>>>>> front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
>>>>>> voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and
>>>>>> second
>>>>>> readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted,
>>>>>> at
>>>>>> final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
>>>>>> register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
>>>>>> abiding citizens."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
>>>>>> women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
>>>>>> yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
>>>>>> spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
>>>>>> Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You’re out of touch," Armstrong
>>>>>> yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
>>>>>> post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
>>>>>> Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
>>>>>> anyplace," Armstrong responded.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
>>>>>> candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
>>>>>> fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
>>>>>> process for the June 28 vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cutline – David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of
>>>>>> his
>>>>>> favourite possessions—motorcycles.
>>>>>> McKnight/KCR
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Unconventional Candidate
>>>>>> David Amos Isn’t Campaigning For Your Vote, But….
>>>>>> By Gisele McKnight
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FUNDY—He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
>>>>>> wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
>>>>>> that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot—David Amos.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his
>>>>>> wife
>>>>>> and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
>>>>>> running for office in Canada.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
>>>>>> to meet Elections Canada requirements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
>>>>>> favourite place to do so—Fundy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
>>>>>> dissatisfaction with politicians.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I’ve become aware of much corruption involving our two countries,"
>>>>>> he
>>>>>> said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
>>>>>> 1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
>>>>>> needed to change his life.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
>>>>>> sometimes in midlife."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So Amos, who’d lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
>>>>>> motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
>>>>>> Panhead motorcycle.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
>>>>>> experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
>>>>>> renew your faith in mankind – you help anyone you can, you never ask
>>>>>> for anything, but you take what they offer."
>>>>>> For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
>>>>>> and conversation all over North America.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
>>>>>> and a daughter and become a house-husband – Mr. Mom, as he calls
>>>>>> himself.
>>>>>> He also describes himself in far more colourful terms—a motorcyclist
>>>>>> rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
>>>>>> individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a
>>>>>> proud
>>>>>> Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."
>>>>>> Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his
>>>>>> life.
>>>>>> "But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
>>>>>> "It’s alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.
>>>>>> "I didn’t appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
>>>>>> interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
>>>>>> call me. I’m not going to drive my opinions down their throats."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.
>>>>>> "I won’t take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some.
>>>>>> It’s
>>>>>> not about money. It goes against what I’m fighting about."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What he’s fighting for is the discussion of issues – tainted blood,
>>>>>> the exploitation of the Maritimes’ gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
>>>>>> name a few.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs –
>>>>>> fishing,
>>>>>> farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I’m
>>>>>> death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
>>>>>> (NAFTA) out the window.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
>>>>>> easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
>>>>>> especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
>>>>>> Don’t necessarily vote for me, but vote."
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Although…if you’re going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
>>>>>> your X by his name.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
>>>>>> say, ‘what the hell.’"
>>>>>
>

New Brunswickers from all over the province denounce the development
of an unconventional shale gas industry. The process used to extract
unconventional shale gas is less than 20 years old. It is the
undisputed cause of ecological damage and long-term economic net debt,
earthquakes, air and noise pollution, infrastructure degradation and
the profligate use and irreversible poisoning of trillions of litres
of fresh water. It leaves deleterious impacts on the lives and health
of humans and other animals in its wake.

“The civic duty of New Brunswick residents does not require that they
be guinea pigs in anyone’s science experiments”, states Jim Emberger,
spokesperson for the Taymouth Community Association.

The promise of large-scale job creation appears over-exaggerated. In a
recent presentation at the University of New Brunswick on October 22,
2011, Mr. Calvin Tillman, former mayor of Dish, Texas mentioned that
since this industry requires highly skilled workers, most will be
imported from outside the province to enable the industry to be more
competitive at a time when stock market prices for natural gas are
low.

Events on Saturday, November 19th will begin at 7:00 am with a Sunrise
Ceremony at the Old Burial Grounds at 51 Woodstock Road. At 10:00 am
there will be a benefit concert at the Old Burial Grounds for the
people of Penobsquis. A march to the Provincial Legislature will begin
after the concert, starting at 11:00 am.

Sixty residents in Penobsquis have lost their well water and have
experienced ground subsidence allegedly from the industrialization of
their rural community. Some who want to move away have been unable to
sell their homes. We ask, where is justice for the people of
Penobsquis? Will regulations serve anyone when more things go wrong? A
point made clear in the recent documentary by Rob Turgeon, ‘Be…
Without Water’. (www.youtube.com/user/robfturgeon#p/a/u/1/aK0NMTMXHSw)

Events on Wednesday, November 23rd are scheduled to begin at the
Provincial Legislature at 12:00 noon. A program with music and
speakers will begin at 1:00 pm.

Media Contacts:

Jean Louis Deveau 506 442 1413 jlpdev@nbnet.nb.ca
Julia Linke 506 367 0987 linkejul@gmail.com
Terry Wishart 506 238 4001 t.wishart@banfrackingnb.ca


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <linkejulia@gmail.com>; "thepurplevioletpress"
<thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>; <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "khalid"
<khalid@windsorenergy.ca>
Cc: <ron.shaw@gnb.ca>; "maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>;
<steve.benteau@gnb.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 5:20 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re Fracking etc Looks I should to clue in some folks
before next week about Windsor Energy and the RCMP EH?


15th and FINAL Shale Gas Sidewalk Protest

For Immediate Release
November 16, 2011
Contact: Julia Linke: linkejulia@gmail.com Telephone: 367-0987

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 11:20:37 -0400
Subject: Re Fracking etc Looks I should to clue in some folks before
next week about Windsor Energy and the RCMP EH?
To: heathbob1983@gmail.com, Sam.McEwan@gnb.ca, "davidc.coon"
<davidc.coon@gmail.com>, bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, water@ccnbaction.ca,
thepurplevioletpress <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
khalid@windsorenergy.ca, "Wayne.Lang"<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles. Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2011/11/10/nb-conservation-council-windsor-energy-rcmp.html

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=269310853105299

http://dailygleaner.canadaeast.com/rss/article/1446369

http://dailygleaner.canadaeast.com/rss/article/1450115

http://thepurplevioletpressnb.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2011-11-09T20%3A27%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=7

Correction
Natural Resources spokesman, Steve Benteau, informed us this afternoon
that Windsor Energy Inc. is indeed the name of the company operating
here in New Brunswick, not Windsor Energy Corp as we had researched on
the internet. It seems Windsor Energy Corp no longer exists, but that
Windsor Energy Inc from the United States is it's own entity, separate
from Calgary-based Windsor Energy Inc in Canada, of which Khalid Amin
is President. We have withdrawn our inquiries with Oklahoma-based
Windsor Energy Inc for information.

We are glad to finally have the questions surrounding these companies
cleared up. It is hoped Benteau and his staff will work with us in the
future to avoid such misunderstandings about DNR clients operating in
New Brunswick, rather than having to rely on the internet for
information.

This publication regrets the error and apologizes for any
inconvenience to readers, DNR or Windsor Energy Inc. - ED.
Posted by The Purple Violet Press at 15:10

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:15:44 -0400
Subject: Re Windsor Energy etc Attn Mike Dawson I am the guy who
called just you on your cell phone (403 669 3402)
To: info@csug.ca, naturalgas@gnb.ca, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, water@conservationcouncil.ca,
ptz@barryspalding.com, michelle.brun-coughlan@gnb.ca,
Sam.McEwan@gnb.ca, "davidc.coon"<davidc.coon@gmail.com>,
Sylvie.Levesque-Finn@gnb.ca, ralph.carr@sussex.ca,
mark.wright@sussex.ca, acampbell@ctv.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com, pcambs@yourlawyer.com,
dbecnel@becnellaw.com, jbuckingham@osler.com, armandpaul@xplornet.ca,
tom_alexander@swn.com, irelatio@swn.com, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"David.ALWARD@gnb.ca"<David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>
Cc: khalid@windsorenergy.ca, maritime_malaise
<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, concernedcitizensofpenobsquis@yahoo.ca,
thepurplevioletpress <thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>,
thenewbrunswicker <thenewbrunswicker@gmail.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>

After i heard Bruce northrup and CBC yapping about Winsor Energy I saw
red and checked your "Society" out immediately When I saw the sneaky
southern Yankee Tom Alexander amongst your frends introduced myself to
you ASAP.

http://www.csur.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=10&Itemid=172

http://www.scottdutton.ca/images/csug_unconventionalgas.pdf

Trust that now you know only a little of what the "Powers that BE" in
the "Place to BE know about mean old me

The Windsor Energy dude was not joking when he said New Brunswick is
the laughing stock of Ablerta Stephen Harper called us defeatists long
ago. That was one of the reasond I first ran aganst your malevolent
party in 2004. Remember Stevey Boy?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephanie Merrill"<water@ccnbaction.ca>
To: <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 24, 2011 11:53 PM
Subject: Thank you for your message Re: On and on it goes for the
people in Penobsquis and their battle with Potash Corp over water EH
Mr Zed?

Hi,

I have received your email, however due to an overwhelming number of
email inquiries, I may be unable to respond quickly.  Please know that
I received your message and will attempt to get back to you when I
can.

If your inquiry is extremely time sensitive, please call our main
office at 506.458.8747.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

Stephanie


Stephanie Merrill
Freshwater Protection Program Coordinator
Shale Gas Alert Campaign Coordinator
CCNB Action
506.458.8747
www.ccnbaction.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:40:44 -0300
Subject: On and on it goes for the people in Penobsquis and their
battle with Potash Corp over water EH Mr Zed?
To: concernedcitizensofpenobsquis
<concernedcitizensofpenobsquis@yahoo.ca>, water
<water@conservationcouncil.ca>, water <water@ccnbaction.ca>,
naturalgas@gnb.ca, ramsey@miningwatch.ca, avbruce@rogers.com, chiefape
<chiefape@gmail.com>, WaterWarCrimes <waterwarcrimes@gmail.com>
Cc: ptz@barryspalding.com, michelle.brun-coughlan@gnb.ca,
"michel.desneiges"<michel.desneiges@sade-els.org>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2011/10/14/nb-penobsquis-mining-hearing-931.html

Well it ain't over till the Fat Lady sings. The folks still have quite
a while to embarass the hell out of you with my actions and evidence
before Rod Duguay brings the hammer down for the benefit of the CROWN
and its buddies instead of the people it serves.

Cover ups involving the CROWN is a VRY serious allegation. Obviously I
mean it. Wanna sue me first?

Furthermore I have yet to sue the CROWN or your law firm or Potash
Corp or their buddies in UBS or Corridor Resources to name but a few.
What will the you and the CROWN do if the icecap over my name melt
before I do? At the very least you cannot deny that I have been lining
up my ducks for years and the cover up of certain crimes such as
murder is not limited by any amount of time to litigate about.

Rest assured that I certainly did not appreciate your clients within
Potash Corp posting my picture at their gate like I was some kind of
criminal while the same photo was posted inside the Legislative
Building in NB as I ran for a seat in parliament in 2006. You may  try
to say that I am a little late until your review the attachment EH Mr
Zed?

You and your fellow lawyers In Barry Spalding were certainly not very
wise officers of the court to ignore all the material I gave you and
the RCMP over the years particularly AFTER the Attorney General, the
Governor General and the RCMP ANSWERED me with a challenge then tried
to have me falsely imprisoned in two countries when the CROWN realized
its mistake. Don't you lawyers even know how to protect your own fat
dumb arses from being sued?

Perhaps people in Penobsquis should ignore their spokespersons such as
Beth Nixon and Beth Norrad and simply think for themselves. If they
just print the one document hereto attached and littered Sussex with
it ASAP the shit may hit the fan overnight in light of the fact that
the potash in Millstream is now in play.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2011/10/21/nb-millstream-potash-exploration.html

 If they print the text of this email as well whether they understand
it or not just put it in the PUBLIC Record before the Mining
Commissioner Roderick Duguay and his Justice Dept lawyer this week it
would be interesting to hear his judgemnt as to why it does not apply.
After he does the folks should up the ante bigtime and demand that
their MLA Bruce Northrup and MP Rob Moore and the CEO of Windsor
Energy to explain this entire email to them in writing.

Wheras it costs nothing at all to send an email Why not follow my lead
and forward this email to Bruce Northrup's gasy people
(naturalgas@gnb.ca) before his big webcast on Thursday?

press release

FREDERICTON -  Natural Resources Minister Bruce Northrup will hold a
live webcast on Thursday, October 27, to answer questions from New
Brunswickers about natural gas exploration and development.

The webcast will take place from 2 pm to 3 pm on the Natural Gas From
Shale website. Residents wishing to submit questions may do so by
e-mail at naturalgas@gnb.ca until 5 pm on Tuesday, October 25

Both Beths and David Coon's people all know as well as I that I talked
to them and a lot other folks in Penobsquis and elsewhere over the
years about their concerns about water etc. Need I say their silence
has been deafening in response to me? In my humble opinion the folks
should have ignored all the lawyers and their self serving sneaky
treehugger friends and simply invited me to explain many things about
Potash Corp and Corridor Resources etc ever since I first ran for a
seat in Parliament in Fundy Royal in 2004. Several of the so called
"Concerned Citizens" and Chris Bell in particular witnessed the circus
between Mr Shaw of Natural Resources, the treehuggers and I during
this meeting about Uranium mining in 2008 Those were MY documents that
Mr Shaw was waving in his hand Correct?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90Lm7S4JEpA&feature=channel_video_title

When I read this I just shook my head. Earthquakes??? Jeez Werner.

http://thepurplevioletpressnb.blogspot.com/2011/10/worried-reader-calls-in.html

Chris Bell must remember Werner was with me when their treehugger
friends denied that they recieved public funds? Well I wonder how
David Coon's and his cohorts explain this very recent lament

http://www.conservationcouncil.ca/News/news10141101.aspx

When I read the following I really shook my head. Trust that the
lawyer Petey Baby Zed would not had dared to ask me the same question
he asked Chris Bell.

Testimony before mining commissioner continues
By Jeanne Whitehead – Kings County Record June 28, 2011

"Peter Zed, PotashCorp’s lawyer, cross-examined Chris Bell."

"He also asked her, “You mentioned a cover-up? You seemed to indicate
the government was implicit with (PotashCorp) in not disclosing the
real reason for the water loss.”
“I don’t remember using that word ‘cover-up’,” she replied.
Zed told her the allegation was a very serious one. “Are you making
any allegations against (PotashCorp)?” he asked.
After several moments of contemplation, Chris Bell responded, “No.”
“Thank you,” said Zed."

In closing I must say your anonymous friend the Mad Ape and his very
nasty friends in Fat fred City such as Chucky Leblanc  pissed me off
long ago. The "ConcernedCitizens" in Penobsquis were not wise to side
with them and against me.

http://www.penobsquis.ca/2011/03/penobsquis-battle-versus-potashcorp-begins/

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369

Enjoy the rest of this email


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:09:47 -0300
Subject: Re Windsor Energy versus Bruce Northrup and the Boyz Not
everybody ignores mean old me EH David Coon?
To: Sam.McEwan@gnb.ca, "davidc.coon"<davidc.coon@gmail.com>,
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, Sylvie.Levesque-Finn@gnb.ca,
ralph.carr@sussex.ca, mark.wright@sussex.ca, acampbell@ctv.ca,
news@kingscorecord.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
dnrweb@gnb.ca, jake.stewart@gnb.ca
Cc: naturalgas@gnb.ca, thepurplevioletpress
<thepurplevioletpress@gmail.com>, doug.holt@gnb.ca,
Perry.Haines@gnb.ca, dallas.mccready@gnb.ca, Byron.James@gnb.ca,
mike.ferguson@gnb.ca, Charles.O'Donnell@gnb.ca, Phil.Lepage@gnb.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 17:23:21 -0300
Subject: Perhaps you and I should talk ASAP Trust that I studied your
company too
To: khalid@windsorenergy.ca

Thanks for the tip about BHP. You and I should talk very soon because
I am about to pass around some info about Windsor Energy because of
some local meeting this weekend.

To be fair to you and your company. You can save these words to keep
me honest. I am not against fracking or mining as long as corporations
and governments hold to the rule of law that are already in place to
protect the environment and our interests as best as humanly possible.
I understand that accidents can happen and I understand my fellow
Maritimers far better than you obviously do. It is the royalties paid
to the the stakeholders (the citizens the governments represent) that
concern me the most.

Trust that I am likely better known and better liked by the common
folk in the Sussex area than Ralph Carr or Bruce Northrup or Rob
Moore. It does not reflect in the polls merely because if you but a
blue coat on the dog in Fundy it will get elected. On the other hand
another awful truth is that if a Maritimer thinks his property or kids
are threatened he will bury the bastard in the yard so to speak and
all his neighbors will bring shovels to help him dig. It is because no
one trusts let alone respect the politicians and most hate the corrupt
RCMP as well.

Your words in the media raised the ire of ordinary folks and McLeod,
Alward and their puppetmasters (Derek Burney and Harper and Mulroney
for example) know it. Your company may become a scapegoat in order to
make him appear ethical.

Here are two good recent examples to support what I say is true.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2007/03/23/nb-masonverdict.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2006/08/02/nb-rcmp.html

Surf through this old file of mine from 2003 to make certain that I am
no bullshitter like Bruce Northrup most certainly is

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf

I know for a fact I can help you make the govenment keep its contract
with you but your task will be to convince me as to why should I wish
to

Veritas Vincit
David Ramond Amos
902 800 0369

On 10/22/11, khalid@windsorenergy.ca<khalid@windsorenergy.ca> wrote:
> BHP is coming to Sussex very soon. Old Millstream deposit.
>
> Some dirt:
> http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/city/article/1449883
>
>
> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:30:40
> To: <khalid@windsorenergy.ca>
> Subject: Re: Fwd: Attn Peter J. Cambs RE SWN I have been invited to take
> all
>  the greasy gassy oily people to Federal Court in Canada
>
> In a nutshell its called public corruption
>
> Did you read this email and study the attachments?
>
> I know who you are if you had read the email you would have noticed
> that i have been studying Potash and Corridor since I first ran for a
> seat in Parliament in he Sussex area in 2004. One of the attachments
> proved that I am the guy who threw a wrench in the BHP hostile
> takeover bid for Potash one year ago
>
> FYI I am this David Amos
>
> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html
>
>
>
> On 10/21/11, khalid@windsorenergy.ca<khalid@windsorenergy.ca> wrote:
>> Yes we are partners on some land. What is this all about ?
>> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 21:20:37
>> To: <khalid@windsorenergy.ca>
>> Subject: Re: Fwd: Attn Peter J. Cambs RE SWN I have been invited to take
>> all
>>  the greasy gassy oily people to Federal Court in Canada
>>
>> You are hooked at the hip with Corridor Resources
>>
>> On 10/21/11, khalid@windsorenergy.ca<khalid@windsorenergy.ca> wrote:
>>> I don't understand why I was emailed.
>>> I am Windsor Energy
>>>
>>> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 19:20:47
>>> To: <khalid@windsorenergy.ca>
>>> Subject: Re: Fwd: Attn Peter J. Cambs RE SWN I have been invited to take
>>> all
>>>  the greasy gassy oily people to Federal Court in Canada
>>>
>>> I am preparing a lawsuit and suggesting that my old friends settle with
>>> me
>>> first
>>>
>>> On 10/21/11, khalid@windsorenergy.ca<khalid@windsorenergy.ca> wrote:
>>>> What's this about?
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my BlackBerry device on the Rogers Wireless Network
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 02:26:53
>>>> To: <khalid@windsorenergy.ca>;
>>>> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>;
>>>> davidc.coon<davidc.coon@gmail.com>;
>>>> maritime_malaise<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>; <pcambs@yourlawyer.com>;
>>>> <dbecnel@becnellaw.com>; <jbuckingham@osler.com>;
>>>> acampbell<acampbell@ctv.ca>; news<news@kingscorecord.com>;
>>>> mclaughlin.heather<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>;
>>>> Barry.MacKnight<Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>;
>>>> danny.copp@fredericton.ca<danny.copp@fredericton.ca>;
>>>> Charles.O'Donnell<Charles.O'Donnell@gnb.ca>
>>>> Cc: <ralph.carr@sussex.ca>; <mark.wright@sussex.ca>;
>>>> Wayne.Lang<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
>>>> David.ALWARD@gnb.ca<David.ALWARD@gnb.ca>; <tom_alexander@swn.com>;
>>>> <irelatio@swn.com>
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Attn Peter J. Cambs RE SWN I have been invited to take
>>>> all
>>>> the
>>>>  greasy gassy oily people to Federal Court in Canada
>>>>
>>>> Mayor: Ralph Carr - Email
>>>> CAO: Scott Hatcher - Email
>>>> Town Clerk/Treasurer: Paul Maguire - Email
>>>>
>>>> 524 Main St.
>>>> Sussex, N. B.
>>>> Canada, E4E 3E4
>>>> Phone: (506) 432-4540
>>>> Fax: (506) 432-4566
>>>>
>>>> Hey Ralph
>>>>
>>>> Trust that did not appreciate YOUR pal Mark Wright making false
>>>> allegations against me and sending the RCMP to harass my friends and I
>>>> right after the last time you and talked while that nasty little
>>>> bastard was working with David Lutz as he was running for parliament
>>>> in 2008.
>>>>
>>>> Furthermore since then not once have you answered an email or returned
>>>> a phone call. HOWCOME RALPH?? Are you too buddy buddy with Bruce
>>>> Northrup and Rob Moore to ignore the truth?
>>>>
>>>> http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/city/article/1449260
>>>>
>>>> You talk of trust but you failed me 3 years ago. I know you liked and
>>>> respected my father like MacKenzie did and I thought we were friends
>>>> as well but I guess not EH Ralph?
>>>>
>>>> Well just so ya know your corrupt cops buddies are trying to say I
>>>> stole my old Harley when in fact they stole it from me and the
>>>> Registar deliberately lost its file. Well YOU were the one who first
>>>> registered it for me when you worked under my father after I bought it
>>>> from a very good friend of mine who bought it brand new in 1965. His
>>>> family will testify to that FACT. Cya'll in Court Ralph.
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 1 800 902 0369
>>>>
>>>> From: "MacKenzie, Lloyd (SNB)"<lloyd.mackenzie@snb.ca>
>>>> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:01:27 -0400
>>>> Subject: Telephone Conversation re: 1965 Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>> Cc: "Bastarache, Donald  J.(SNB)"<Donald.Bastarache@snb.ca>,
>>>> "Morrison, Bill (SNB)"<bill.morrison@snb.ca>, "Levesque-Finn, Sylvie
>>>> (SNB)"<Sylvie.Levesque-Finn@snb.ca>, "Pleadwell, Derek (SNB)"
>>>> <Derek.Pleadwell@snb.ca>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Upon your request I will inform Mr. Derek Pleadwell[(506)
>>>> 444-2897], Chairperson SNB Board of Directors, of our extended
>>>> conversation regarding the issues surrounding the 1965 Harley-Davidson
>>>> motorcycle when he visits my office at approximately 3:30 P.M. today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Also, as requested, I've copied in Ms. Sylvie
>>>> Levesque-Finn[(506) 453-3879], SNB President.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Lloyd D. MacKenzie, AACI, P. App, CAE
>>>>
>>>> Regional Manager of Assessment - Beauséjour Region/Responsable
>>>> régional de l'évaluation - region Beauséjour
>>>>
>>>> Assessment/ de l'évaluation
>>>>
>>>> Service New Brunswick/ Service Nouveau-Brunswick
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 633 rue Main St. 4th floor/4ième étage
>>>>
>>>> Moncton, NB
>>>>
>>>> E1C 8R3
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tel/Tél: (506) 856-3910
>>>>
>>>> Fax/Téléc: (506) 856-2519
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  From: "Lessard, Daniel  (DPS/MSP)"<Daniel.Lessard@gnb.ca>
>>>> Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:14:12 -0300
>>>> Subject: Out of Office: Telephone Conversation re: 1965
>>>> Harley-Davidson Motorcycle
>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Bonjour.
>>>>
>>>> Je suis assigné à Communications Nouveau-Brunswick pour une période
>>>> indéterminée.
>>>>
>>>> Pour toutes questions relatives au ministère de la SÉCURITÉ PUBLIQUE,
>>>> veuillez communiquer avec Lisa Harrity à l'adresse lisa.harrity@gnb.ca
>>>> ou par téléphone au numéro 506-453-4433. Merci.
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Lessard
>>>> Agent de communications
>>>> Ministère de la Sécurité publique
>>>> 506-444-5267
>>>> daniel.lessard@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> I will be working with Communications New Brunswick until further
>>>> notice.
>>>>
>>>> Any issues/questions related to the Department of PUBLIC SAFETY should
>>>> be sent to Lisa Harrity at lisa.harrity@gnb.ca. You can also reach her
>>>> at 506-453-4433. Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Daniel Lessard
>>>> Communications Officer
>>>> Department of Public Safety
>>>> 506-444-5267
>>>> daniel.lessard@gnb.ca
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 06:57:27 -0300
>>>> Subject: Attn Peter J. Cambs RE SWN I have been invited to take all
>>>> the greasy gassy oily people to Federal Court in Canada
>>>> To: pcambs@yourlawyer.com, dbecnel@becnellaw.com,
>>>> jbuckingham@osler.com, armandpaul@xplornet.ca, tom_alexander@swn.com,
>>>> irelatio@swn.com, mike.wilson@fredericton.ca,
>>>> alfonso.leon@apachecorp.com, rob.rayphole@apachecorp.com,
>>>> energy@conservationcouncil.ca, todd@forestethics.com,
>>>> Can_Steward.Shared@apachecorp.com
>>>> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>>> philippe.gauthier@shell.com, mwood@talisman-energy.com,
>>>> deborah_provias@nexeninc.com, marc.jackson@encana.com,
>>>> dana@cumberlandltd.com
>>>>
>>>> Peter J. Cambs
>>>> Parker Waichman Alonso LLP
>>>> 6 Harbor Park Drive
>>>> Port Washington, NY 11050
>>>> Telephone: (516) 466-6500
>>>> pcambs@yourlawyer.com
>>>>
>>>> The Halliburton Loophole embedded within the 2005 US Energy Bill may
>>>> give you some trouble protecting your client's rights and interests
>>>> but i do not believe that Canada has followed suit with such malicious
>>>> nonsense yet. However now that that the PM Harper as a his big mandate
>>>> things could change in a heart beat for the benefit of his
>>>> benefactors.
>>>>
>>>> At least Harper cannot deny that it was Corridor Resources and their
>>>> partner Potash Corp that invited many greedy Yankees to my old
>>>> stomping grounds to drill in New Brunswick. Nor can he deny the fact
>>>> that I had something to do with the FAILED BHP takeover bid during the
>>>> last provincial election in new Brunswick. One attachment and one
>>>> email below easily prove that fact.
>>>>
>>>> The attachments also prove that the Feds cannot deny that I
>>>> encountered Corridor Resources and a lot of their friends in 2006
>>>> during a National Energy Board Hearing while running for public office
>>>> for the last time.
>>>>
>>>> Now that you are involved in a lawsuit that SWN makes light of in
>>>> Canada perhaps you should read some Canadian news then check some of
>>>> my work to see if we can be of some assistance to each other.
>>>>
>>>> This was an interesting comment
>>>>
>>>> http://timestranscript.canadaeast.com/front/article/1423873



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 16:16:45 -0300
Subject: David Coon of the Green Meanies Roberta Clowater, Graham
Forbes, Kent Hardy, and all their pals on CBC should ask Chucky
Leblanc's Indian pals to say Hoka Hey to his buddies the Irvings, SWN,
Alward and Gallant on behalf of John and Jane Doe N'esy Pas?
To: rclowater <rclowater@cpaws.org>, media <media@cpaws.org>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>, execdirgen <execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>,
"Brian.gifford"<Brian.gifford@bellaliant.net>, "Davidc.Coon"
<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
infoamfredericton@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
keith.ashfield.a1@parl.gc.ca, forest <forest@conservationcouncil.ca>,
"paul.robichaud"<paul.robichaud@gnb.ca>, "marc.chiasson"
<marc.chiasson@mcinnescooper.com>, gforbes@unb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, linkejul <linkejul@gmail.com>

http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2014/03/13/forestry-report-2/

http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/canada/new-brunswick/story/1.2543625

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <CHenschel@cpaws.org>; <media@cpaws.org>; <cpawsnb@nb.sympatico.ca>;
<rclowater@cpaws.org>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 5:21 AM
Subject: Do you people want my help YET???


http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/15/protected-areas/

http://cpaws.org/news/chapter/nb

Media contact:

Ellen Adelberg
Director of Communications
(613)569-7226 ext. 234
media@cpaws.org

http://www.nben.ca/en/collaborative-action/news-from-groups/itemlist/user/212-Contact:

Roberta Clowater, 506-452-9902; cpawsnb@nb.sympatico.ca

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <mjs837@nyu.edu>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 9:49 PM
Subject: Re Fracking wars Mr Slade Trust that there is a lot more to this
than
what Chucky or the protesters or the RCMP or the politicians will tell you


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFtuNmTH7Qg

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Skurnik"<joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca>
To: "'David Amos'"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, December 13, 2013 8:08 AM
Subject: Thanks for your help on this

http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/straighttalk/archives/2013/12/20131212-214607.html


JOSHUA SKURNIK | MOBILE JOURNALIST
t 604.322.2360 | c (604).649.3011 | joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca
24 West 2nd Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1B3
www.sunnewsnetwork.ca Sun News Network is Canada's home for Hard News and
Straight Talk. Sun News Network is a division of Quebecor Media Inc.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joshua Skurnik <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 22:21:28 -0800
Subject: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

This is good stuff. Thank you very much. Just email me at my hotmail
account, I'll get it just the same.

Josh

On Nov 15, 2013, at 10:08 PM, David Amos wrote:


From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:07:37 -0400
Subject: Re: What can you tell me about these two?
To: Joshua Skurnik <joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca>, "joshua.skurnik"
<joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

I believe Willi (A bit of a nut) and Maxime and his wife (they mean
what they say) are harmless two bit players who genuinely care about
the environment. The proof of the pudding is they stand in line and
are willing to be arrested

The local masters of disaster orchestring things behind the scenes are
the very greedy little Indian lawyers TJ Burke and Pam Palmater,  the
Green meanies funded by Tides etc David Coon, local leader of Green
Party the Council of Canadians Council of Canadians Maude Barlow and
the strange anarchists of the Occupy crowd funded by George Soros

You already met one of the biggest shit disturbers that runs with
David Coon Maude Barlow and Dizzy Lizzy May Her name is Pamela Ross
she got her friends to block you twice thus far.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5xADesJNeU

Notice Pammy Baby and Chucky Leblanc are all buddy buddy with the other
media?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVOpy-nU8xg

Myles Howe is the Occupy dude running spin

http://halifax.mediacoop.ca/video/occupy-halifax-police-brutality-miles-howe-describes-his-arrest/9024

BTW Sunmedia is blocking me

http://willinolanspeaks.wordpress.com/2011/12/12/who-is-willi-nolan-biography/

http://willilittlefire.wordpress.com/2009/01/26/about-gramma-willi/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAVc1nvymPs

http://willinolanspeaks.wordpress.com/council-of-elders-session-transcripts/

http://www.hereonearth.ca/Here_On_Earth/Krow/Krow.html

http://www.nben.ca/fr/ma-eco-communaute-du-nb/197-maxime-daigle/profile

http://ohiocitizen.org/new-brunswick-ex-oil-worker-blasts-shale-gas-industry/

http://www.gnb.ca/Commission/pdf/Shale_gas_exploration.pdf

On 11/15/13, Joshua Skurnik <joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca> wrote:

Rachel and Maxime Daigle, some are telling me that they are the real reason
behind the Native uprising in Rexton. Thoughts?

Josh

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Skurnik"<joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca>
To: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:08 PM
Subject: What do you have on Willi Nolan?

Hi David,

I'm doing an in-depth report on fracking in BC and the Maritimes, and
one of the focuses is on the actual protestors involved in Rexton.

For Willi Nolan, I have her Facebook page, the civil suit documents
against her, and the Forbes article about her Tampon scam.

Here are the links:

http://www.forbes.com/global/1999/0517/0210033a.html

https://www.facebook.com/willi.nolan

Do you know if she is originally from California? Where is she based now?

Any other information is greatly appreciated, thank you very much for your
help.

Josh


JOSHUA SKURNIK | MOBILE JOURNALIST

t 604.322.2360 | c (604).649.3011 | joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca

24 West 2nd Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1B3
www.sunnewsnetwork.ca Sun News Network is Canada's home for Hard News
and Straight Talk. Sun News Network is a division of Quebecor Media Inc.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:56:53 -0300
Subject: Re: Do you recognize these names?
To: Joshua Skurnik <joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca>

Cook

On 10/28/13, Joshua Skurnik <joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca> wrote:
> Thank you very much. Do you know which ones are administrators of Shale
> Gas
> Alerts NB, the Facebook group?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:48 PM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/28/13, Joshua Skurnik <joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca> wrote:
>>> Loraine Clair Don't know her
>>>
>>> Jim Pictou Warrior General
>>>
>>> Seven Bernard Warrior
>>>
>>> Jason Okay Warrior
>>>
>>> Greg Cook Bullshitting writer from Saint John
>>>
>>> Wilhelmina ('Will') Nolan Nice skinny black/indina lady they call granny
>>>
>>> Melanie Elward Don't know her
>>>
>>> Ann Pohl Old woman loves to argue
>>>
>>> Rachel Dalgle Don't know her but she maybe that little french girl that
>>> was arrested in June
>>>
>>> Suzanne Patles Young warrior with big mouth from Cape Breton
>>>
>>> I know that Pictou and Okay are part of the six who had bail hearings.
>>> What about the others?
>>>
>>> Josh
>>> P.S I died laughing watching you talk to Amy Sock
>>>
>>> JOSHUA SKURNIK | MOBILE JOURNALIST
>>>
>>> t 604.322.2360 | c (604).649.3011 | joshua.skurnik@sunmedia.ca
>>>
>>> 24 West 2nd Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1B3
>>> www.sunnewsnetwork.ca Sun News Network is Canada's home for Hard News
>>> and
>>> Straight Talk. Sun News Network is a division of Quebecor Media Inc.
>>>
>>>
>


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <hmc@mediacoop.ca>; "oldmaison"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"wendallnicholas"<wendallnicholas@gmail.com>; "john.warr"
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "premier"<premier@gov.ab.ca>;
"Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>; "marie-claude.blais"
<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; "markandcaroline"<markandcaroline@gmail.com>;
"andre"<andre@jafaust.com>; "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>;
"acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>; "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
<Andy.Campbell@bellmedia.ca>; <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:38 AM
Subject: Re: I see that Miles Howe finally got around to calling me back
Kinda late though EH Insp Warr?
From: Andy Campbell <Andy.Campbell@bellmedia.ca>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:37:03 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: I see that Miles Howe finally got around to
calling me back Kinda late though EH Insp Warr?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the Fredericton bureau until Monday, July 29, 2013.
Should your matter require immediate attention, please contact Nick
Moore at nmoore@bellmedia.ca or call our main newsroom at
1-888-565-6397.

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <hmc@mediacoop.ca>; "oldmaison"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"wendallnicholas"<wendallnicholas@gmail.com>; "john.warr"
<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "premier"<premier@gov.ab.ca>;
"Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>; "marie-claude.blais"
<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>; "markandcaroline"<markandcaroline@gmail.com>;
"andre"<andre@jafaust.com>; "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>;
"acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>; "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:37 AM
Subject: I see that Miles Howe finally got around to calling me back
Kinda late though EH Insp Warr?


Organizer:Miles Howe (902-422-0097), Natascia Lypny (902-266-3678),
hmc@mediacoop.ca

http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2013/07/is-miles-howe-rcmp-rat.html

Saturday, July 6, 2013
Is Miles Howe a RCMP Rat?

Is Halifax "media co-op""reporter a real journalist or a
propagandist, or perhaps a RCMP rat? Injin "war chief" John Levi is in
jail tonight, no doubt some inmate's "fuck buddy." Yet ersatz
journalist Miles Howe who claims to be with "big chief" John Levi was
not charged.

No one actually reads or takes seriously the Halifax media co-op
because it is not "media," but merely the shill for "activist causes",
NGO's, and social agencies, in short a propaganda organ, akin to
Isvestia or Pravda. Here in Alberta the "media co-op," doesn't exist,
I wonder why?

"By their fruits ye shall know them." Elsipogtog "war chief," and the
minute number of Indian "activists"  have assaulted innocent work
crews, burned  seismic vehicles, sawed  old growth trees to block
roads, blockaded public thoroughfares, and have committee other
violent, criminal, and legally defined terrorist acts. And these
Indian animals try to pass all this off as "peaceful protest," or
"cultural rituals."

Preston Manning said many years ago, "if you turn on porch light, you
will no doubt attract some bugs. Very few if any decent, or white
people are attending these "native protests."

But there is always an exception. Social welfare parasite, emotionally
disturbed convicted criminal and self described "journalist" Charles
Leblanc will, as he says; "will be there." Charles Leblanc "will be
there" at the "protests in Kent County this Saturday morning. He will
be there not because of any great "journalist" type motives, but
merely because there will be a free "pot luck lunch" served. Whenever
there is a "free lunch," involved you can count on our "citizen
journalist," and self described "activist" Charles Leblanc elbowing
everyone to get at the free food. "Potlucks" are where everyone
contributes to dinner of lunch. You can count on Charles Leblanc to
contribute absolutely nothing, as he is wont to do his entire misspent
life. Even his parents had to ban him from the family home, because
Charles was still mooching off them in his twenties.

Again, "by their fruits ye shall know them."  Many of our so called
"peaceful protesters have extensive criminal records, are addicts
indulging their addictions around the "sacred fire" in the "sacred
camp," and drinking "sacred firewater."

None of these "native warriors," or "peacekeepers' or concerned about
Mother Earth are educated, employed, or are in manner successful
individuals. Their goal is to prevent jobs, employment, success,
enhance education of children and an escape from that New Brunswick
"cultural" traditions....pogey and equalization.

These animals and folks like Charles Leblanc do NOT care about "Mother
Earth," as much as they care about being fat, idle, ignorant and on
the dole.

So today, whilst Miles Howe, Charles Leblanc and the rest of the
little Indian  boys, and squaws dine heartily on food purchase by
social welfare...consider this? Who are the rats amongst you? So
Wendall Nicholas, how does the new "peacekeeper T shirt fit? Be
careful not to slop firewater on it!

Pocohontas Amy Sock, baby! How about a nice half and half for thirty
bucks? That would make "mother Earth" really happy, if not clapped and
dosed up
Posted by Seren at 9:47 AM

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "hmc"<hmc@mediacoop.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 6:46 AM
Subject: Fwd Perhaps the wise old Indian Billy Lewis will ask me someday
why I was laughing at the fact that two Newfys John Warr and his
buddy/boss Roger Brown of J Division in RCMP are the ones in charge of
the fracking battles with the "War Chief" John Levi

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 20:56:20 -0300
Subject: Perhaps the wise old Indian Billy Lewis will ask me someday
why I was laughing at the fact that two Newfys John Warr and his
buddy/boss Roger Brown of J Division in RCMP are the ones in charge of
the fracking battles with the "War Chief" John Levi
To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, sbartone22r@gmail.com,
kquinn@kairoscanada.org, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "mckeen.randy"<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>,
"mclaughlin.heather"<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, minister
<minister@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca>, "john.warr"<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

After watching the circus unfold for a couple of weeks and reading
what the lawyer Amy Sock had to say I figured that it was High Time to
give the Warrior Chief John Levi a ring to see if anyone had even
mentioned my concerns and my ofers of assistance against the RCMP to
him.

Need I say that I was not surprised that John Levi like old Billy
Lewis did not have the faintest notion as to who I was? To be fair I
never heard of either of them until this month. However a simple search
on the Internet will easily prove that most of their purported enemies and
many of their supposed pals have known exactly who I am for many years.
More importantlyy he has had many people around him lately who have
been recieving the same emails as the RCMP. Top of the list would be the
NDP, David Coon's Green Meanies, the Council of Canadians, the Sierra
Club and of course Chucky Leblanc and his media pals in the the CBC CTV
and the IRVING crowd.

While waiting for a call back from John Levi I pasted together a
couple of important emails I sent to John Warr beginning late last
year hen I learned he in charge of the jurisdiction where I was born
and raised and ran for a seat in Parliament while I was a friend and
supporter of the nasty Newfy Byron Prior. Just like Chucky Leblanc,
Barry Bachrach, Werner Bock, Mary Ann Hennen, Alex Hunter and
several other the Newfy Byron Prior stabbed me in the back after he
thought he made a deal to his advantage with some corrupt politicians.
Seems that people never learn that cops, lawyers, politicians, bankers,
bureaucrats and priests talk of ethical conduct but they are in fact
the last people to be trusted.

It has been a couple of hours since I called John Levi. He told me he
was in a meeting with a bunch of his supporters and that he would call
me back. I suggested that he mention my name to his friends and see
if any of them admitted to knowing of me. Almost instantly I noticed two
hits to the most relevant blog about John Levi's doings. Methinks there
are no coincidences. I will not bother him anymore and merely give him
the benefit of my doubts. I truly hope that Levi calls me back. However
I am not betting on it. People so seldom do.

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/06/fwd-oh-dear-alward-and-cohorts-should.html

A visitor from Canada left "The David Amos Rant: Fwd: Oh Dear Alward
and cohorts should be nervous now that the Indians, Greg Renouf, John
Bennett, Michel DesNeiges and Maude Barlow have "Issues" with your
buddy N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?" via justicedonedirtch eap.blogspot.ca
1 hour 51 mins ago

A visitor from Canada arrived from google.com and viewed "The David
Amos Rant: Fwd: Oh Dear Alward and cohorts should be nervous now that
the Indians, Greg Renouf, John Bennett, Michel DesNeiges and Maude
Barlow have "Issues" with your buddy N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?" 2
hours 4 mins ago


Whether John Levi ever calls me back or not at least like old Billy
Lewis and the nasty Roger Augustine  he now knows that I exist and
that amongst our common foes today are two cops from the "Rock"
John Warr and his boss Roger Brown. A funny part of our converstion
to me was that John Levi said he knew who Leonard Peltier was but
did not know Billy Lewis. Levi's answer was he was new to this stuff?
Yet Billy Lewis claimed he was at the sacred fire in New Brunswick very
recently. Perhaps Levi did not understand me I don't know. I do know for
sure Billy Lewis never called me back and Angela Giles suddenly took a
vacation. Go Figure. These are just some of their many words that I have
read. I bet these people must have read a few of mine sent directly to
them after calling them as well.

http://canadians.org/media/water/2013/14-Jun-13.html

"Where is the media?" asks Angela Giles, Atlantic regional organizer
with the Council of Canadians. "And how is this democracy? The New
Brunswick government has not been given the mandate to move ahead with
shale gas development. The RCMP are paid with public money and then
are assigned to protect private interests over the interests of the
people... This is not right."

Billy Lewis, Mi'kmaq elder, also visited and prayed at the Sacred Fire
in Elsipogtog yesterday. "This is Indigenous land and there is a duty
to consult Mi'kmaq and Maliseet, and they weren't consulted. These
actions affect the land, the treaties and all of us."

http://rabble.ca/rabbletv/program-guide/2013/06/best-net/video-john-levi-and-amy-sock-call-solidarity-against-frackin

http://rabble.ca/blogs/bloggers/council-canadians/2013/06/peaceful-resistance-to-shale-gas-nb-may-soon-come-to-head

http://kairoshalifax.wordpress.com/2013/06/13/urgent-call-for-support-of-a-treaty-assertion-action-initiated-by-the-mikmaq-in-elsipogtog-big-cove-new-brunswick/

http://www.cfne.org/modules/news/index.php?start=60

http://nbharbinger.wordpress.com/category/new-brunswick/

http://halifax.mediacoop.ca/video/plea-immediate-assistance-elsipogtog-war-chief-joh/18028

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/06/23/nb-fracking-protesters.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/06/22/ns-shale-gas-protestors-charged.html

http://www.gnb.ca/hrc-cdp/e/d/43.0%20E%20HR-003-07%20Sock%20v%20Legal%20Aid%20New%20Brunswick%20Board%20of%20Inquiry.pdf

http://lefteyex.wordpress.com/2013/02/21/new-shale-gas-rules-put-the-cart-before-the-horse/

Perhaps the RCMP and anyone else who understands that politicians and
lawyers are monumental liars and is truly interested in justice should
scrolll down

Clearly on May 31st of this year I reminded the two Newfy RCMP bosses that I
knew they were they were in my old stomping grounds and I was paying
attention as I remindded them about my dongs with their old buddy Byron
Prior.

You can bet I made many calls and sent many emails before and after thirty
some people have needlessly gotten themselves arrested..I suspected that
John
Warr is the unamed boss in the Irish Town Community Hall. At least no
corrupt
cop has denied it yet. Trust that the RCMP and legions of others in many
countries know my  issues with public corruption, the RCMP, banksters and
the Greasey Gassy Oily guys go way back in time. The RCMP attacked me
LONG before John Levi and his little band of fellow "native warriors"
decided to
seize a Stantec truck that is used in SWN Resources' shale gas work . At
first I
thought it comical that John Levi wold pick a fight like that then allow the
local RCMP to take the truck and park it at their local cop shop so they
could surround it there. However who am I to judge? Nobody has the balls to
even say my name. Levi's actions did make the National News byway of a
little Pow Wow with the other questionable CROWN Corp known as the CBC
and the very next day they had quite a sizable fan club..On the otherhand I
have
no fans at all who are willing admit in public that I even exist. Yet there
are lots of evil trolls on the Internet who are more that willing to
harrass slander and threaten my family and I for the benefit of the RCMP and
their political puppetmasters and their corporate sponsors etc. Of that I
have
no doubt.

If the RCMP would harass litterly hundreds of their own members and even
kill citizens that they puportedly serve and protect why it is unbelievable
to
think they would attack a whistleblower trying hard to expose their many
wrongs?

If you doubt me ask John Warr and Roger Brown about Byron Prior and I and
laugh as watch the play dumb or run away from you.  FYI What I was trying
to telll John Levi on the phone is that all any anti fracking protester has
to do
to make the CROWN stay the charges against them is to simply serve some of
my documents on the RCMP. I was telling many others to watch Werner Bock
and his UFO arguments with the CROWN this week. I suspect that pigheaded
old farmer and newborn Nazi supporter would rather lose his farm than admit
I
was correct about Byron Prior and their many political friends. Where will
his
pals be if Bock gets his nasty arse locked up as nut just like it has
happened
twice before?

Trust that I will never come to his defense again but I may sue the CROWN
about
my cattle. Section 444 is stilll on the books CORRECT?

Anyway all of this political bullsit about natural resources reminds me of
the actions of  AIM and the FBI in Pine Ridge back in the 1970s. Many people
wound up MURDERED including a AN ETHICAL Mic Mac lady and now at least one
of her daughters is a member of the RCMP. Go figure why I wonder what Anna
Mae's daughter thinks as her fellow cops attack her Mother's people in our
Native Land instead of the US of A EH?

Politically speaking Harper and everybody else want to forget what I said
about NaTural Gas, Natural Resources and NAFTA etc when I ran for Parliament
in the the area in 2004.

Perhaps the RCMP should study a LOTof documents and perpare to argue me
while ordinary folks review an IRVING News Rag trying to make fun of my
concerns in 2004 N'esy Pas?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 02:13:34 -0300
Subject: Re Potash and the boss of BHP Billiton, Mr Harper and a host
of Green Meanies versus Mean Old me
To: nomadicgatherings@gmail.com, markbonokoski@gmail.com,
thecos@teksavvy.com, thecos@the-wire.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
leader <leader@greenparty.ca>

---- Original Message -----
From: "McKnight, Gisele"McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
To: lcampenella@ledger.com
Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: David Amos

Hello Lisa,

David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
federal
election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
Fundy (now called  Fundy-Royal).

I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
the candidates' debate held June 18.

As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.

I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
that ran, but this one is very similar.


A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG

Gisele McKnight editor
Kings County Record
Sussex, New Brunswick
Canada
506-433-1070


Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd

By Erin Hatfield

"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.

The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat."


Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions--motorcycles.

McKnight/KCR

The Unconventional Candidate

David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But....

By Gisele McKnight

FUNDY--He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."


"Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.

"I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."

And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.

"I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."

What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.

"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.

"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."


----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <wuestl@nbnet.nb.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2013 8:39 PM
Subject: Mr Wuest i just called from 902 800 0369 Lots of your friends know
exactly who I am


http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/17/mining-interests-blamed/

http://www.nashwaakwatershed.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Communique-classification-des-eaux.pdf

Lawrence Wuest 367 2280

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <hraper@mlpi.ca>; <news@959sunfm.com>; <umoe@umoe.no>; "bruce.northrup"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>; "briangallant10"<briangallant10@gmail.com>;
"Bill.Fraser"<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>; "oldmaison"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
"Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>; <dblenkhorn@mlb.ca>; "premier"
<premier@gnb.ca>; "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>; "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>; "acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>; "jb"
<jb@sierraclub.ca>; "leader"<leader@greenparty.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 4:33 PM
Subject: Mr Raper Say Hey to Harry Steele's new local news men or Chucky
Leblanc and hs pals Coon, Fraser, Trevors, Alward, Northrup and Sequin for
me


I find it interesting that because CBC has ignored their mandate since
2002 people don't think I am for real

http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/07/mr-raper-i-know-for-fact-i-can-help.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2012/03/30/nb-forestry-plan-northrup-924.html

From: Elizabeth May <leader@greenparty.ca>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:45:47 -0700
Subject: Thank you for your message / Merci pour votre courriel Re: Oh
My My A Wealthy family in Norway UMO/Fornebu have helped the Irvings
pick a fight in my old stomping grounds EH Mr Gallant?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for your email. We will work to ensure that a response is
sent to you as soon as possible.

For invitations or meeting requests, please email ea@greenparty.ca.
For media inquiries, please email media@greenparty.ca.

Nous vous remercions d'avoir pris le temps de nous écrire. Nous ne
ménagerons aucun effort pour vous transmettre notre réponse dans les
meilleurs délais.

Leader's Office Correspondence Team
Équipe de correspondance du Bureau de la chef

--
Green Party of Canada
Parti vert du Canada
1-866-868-3447
www.greenparty.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 16:18:43 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Mr Raper I know for a fact I can help with your trouble
with Irving's greed and Northrups inaction in support of it
To: hraper@mlpi.ca, "umoe@umoe.no \"news\""<news@959sunfm.com>,
"terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "bruce.northrup"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "Bill.Fraser"<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>


My number is 902 800 0369

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/07/23/nb-irving-investment-miramichi-619.html

http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/23/miramichi-mill/

http://www.workingforest.com/fornebu-mill-nb-receives-25-m-provincial-loan/

http://www.mlb.ca/members_producers.html

Miramichi Timber - Boiestown

OFFICE
25 Jane St.
Miramichi, NB, E1V 2S6
Telephone: 506-627-9971
Fax: 506-622-6308
Email: hraper@mlpi.ca
Contact: Hal Raper



----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <umoe@umoe.no>; "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>;
"briangallant10"<briangallant10@gmail.com>; "Bill.Fraser"
<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>; "oldmaison"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>; "Davidc.Coon"
<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>; <hraper@mlpi.ca>; <dblenkhorn@mlb.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "premier"<premier@gnb.ca>;
"john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>; "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>; "acampbell"<acampbell@ctv.ca>; "jb"
<jb@sierraclub.ca>; "leader"<leader@greenparty.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 3:45 PM
Subject: Oh My My A Wealthy family in Norway UMO/Fornebu have helped the
Irvings pick a fight in my old stomping grounds EH Mr Gallant?


Too too funny Big bad Billy Fraser has to send his news release to
Chucky Leblanc because the Irvings won't print it?

http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.ca/2013/07/leader-of-green-party-david-coon.html

Your pals David Coon and Chucky Leblanc will talk off Umoe all day but
they will never explain these videos N'esy Pas Brucy baby Northrup?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7c4VjtY3-M

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7Ir55k6kMY

http://www.umoe.com/the-company/management/

http://www.mlb.ca/members_producers.html

http://www.miramichionline.com/miramichi-news-fornebu-lumber-company-allowcated-40000m3-of-hardwood-pulp-wood-for-export-to-overseas-markets/

http://www.workingforest.com/fornebu-mill-nb-receives-25-m-provincial-loan/

http://eng.itfornebu.no/executive-management/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:12:32 -0300
Subject: Say hello to the "Gov" Ricky Baby Perry for me Howie You
SOUTHERN Yankee bastards hang to far many innocent people to suit mean
old me
To: paul.paulos@ci.stpaul.mn.us, howie.padilla@ci.stpaul.mn.us,
campaign@rickperry.org
Cc: DAvid R Amos <davidr_amos@yahoo.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, newstips <newstips@cnn.com>

Texans for Rick Perry
815-A Brazos Street, PMB 217
Austin, TX 78701

Phone:

512-478-3276


> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 21,964
> Domain Name swbell.net ? (Network)
> IP Address 69.153.163.# (Texans For Rick Perry)
> ISP SBC Internet Services
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : Texas
> City : Austin
> Lat/Long : 30.3037, -97.7696 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Macintosh WinNT
> Browser Safari 1.3
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko)
> Chrome/12.0.742.122 Safari/534.30
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 800
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 2 2011 8:14:13 pm
> Last Page View Aug 2 2011 8:14:13 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-6:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 2 2011 1:14:13 pm
> Visit Number 21,964
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 21,970
> Domain Name state.tx.us ? (U.S.)
> IP Address 204.65.226.# (STATE OF TEXAS GENERAL SERVICES COMMISSION)
> ISP STATE OF TEXAS GENERAL SERVICES COMMISSION
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : Texas
> City : Austin
> Lat/Long : 30.3037, -97.7696 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0;
> InfoPath.2; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR
> 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.5.21022; .NET CLR
> 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 2 2011 10:04:07 pm
> Last Page View Aug 2 2011 10:04:07 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-6:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 2 2011 3:04:07 pm
> Visit Number 21,970
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 21,962
> Domain Name senate.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 156.33.87.# (U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms)
> ISP U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Macintosh MacOSX
> Browser Safari 1.3
> Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_7; en-us)
> AppleWebKit/533.21.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.5 Safari/533.21.1
> Javascript version 1.5
> Monitor Resolution : 2560 x 1440
> Color Depth : 24 bits
> Time of Visit Aug 2 2011 7:01:04 pm
> Last Page View Aug 2 2011 7:01:04 pm
> Visit Length 0 seconds
> Page Views 1
> Referring URL http://www.google.co...wwWJrm94lCEqRmovPXJg
> Search Engine google.com
> Search Words david amos madoff
> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-olsen-on.html
> Out Click
> Time Zone UTC-5:00
> Visitor's Time Aug 2 2011 1:01:04 pm
> Visit Number 21,962

http://o.canada.com/2013/07/17/mike-allen-mla-prostitution/

Howie Padilla
Public Information Coordinator

Office: 651-266-5735

 Before joining the Saint Paul Police Department as Public Information
Coordinator for in August of 2011, he spent four years serving in
communications roles at Saint Paul Public Schools. He also spent seven
years reporting on Public Safety and Justice issues at the Star
Tribune following graduation from the University of North Dakota where
he majored in Communications.

Sgt. Paul Paulos
Public Information Officer
Office: 651-266-5639

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 18:40:29 -0300
Subject: Mr Campbell mett Mr Bauer say hello to Mr Obama lawyer and
our Attorney general Mr Mackay for me will ya?
To: paul.williams@ci.stpaul.mn.us, joe.campbell@ci.stpaul.mn.us,
RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>, "fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo"
<fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>

Just so ya my Scottish ancestors told us to NEVER trust a poltician
named Campbell

Paul Williams
Mayor's Staff
Title: Deputy Mayor
Phone: (651) 266-8569

Joe Campbell
Mayor's Staff
Title: Director of Communications
Phone: (651) 266-8518

Bruce Northrup unveils new forestry plan
Annual allowable cut for softwood lumber remains the same
CBC News
Posted: Mar 30, 2012 9:44 AM AT

Natural Resources Minister Bruce Northrup is holding the line on the
annual allowable cut for softwood lumber in the provincial
government's new forestry policy.

Northrup made the long-awaited announcement today in Fredericton.

The annual allowable cut for softwood, such as spruce, fir and jack
pine, is 3.27 million cubic metres, which is the same annual allowable
cut as in the 2007-2012 management plan.

Northrup said the department's projections show the annual allowable
cut for softwood lumber can be maintained at the existing level.

"All our information indicates there will be a rapidly growing wood
supply beginning around 2030 as these managed stands mature,''
Northrup said.

"Until then, we are confident there will be enough wood to at least
maintain the softwood AAC at the present level and that is our
objective.''

Meanwhile, the Department of Natural Resources is cutting the annual
allowable cut for hardwood to 1.41 million cubic metres from 1.77
million cubic metres in the 2007-2012 plan. The 21 per cent reduction
will ensure a sustainable hardwood supply in the future, according to
the department.

"It would be in no one's interest to harvest hardwood species at a
level that would require an even larger AAC reduction in the future,
the natural resources minister said.

"This reduction is necessary and, at the same time, it represents an
opportunity for the province's private woodlot sector to sell more
wood into the marketplace, which is a top priority for our
government.''

Northrup said his forest management plan is "balanced." He said it
would help support the environment and maintain jobs in the industry.

"It strikes the best balance possible while preserving jobs in rural
and northern New Brunswick, where forestry remains a major employer
and a $2.7-billion industry," he said.

The forest management plan also outlined how:

the amount of forested Crown land designated as protected natural
areas is increased to eight per cent.
28 per cent of Crown forest is designated as "conservation forest."
"non-clearcut harvesting measures" would be implemented.
The management plan starts in April 2012 and continues until March 31,
2022. The 10-year plan is double the normal length of the previous
forest management plans.

Northrup said the recommendation for a longer management plan came
from a government-appointed management plan.

"The Crown Land Task Force on timber objectives recommended we move to
a 10-year planning cycle in order to provide greater certainty on
allocation levels as well as commitments to conservation measures,''
Northrup said.

The natural resources minister said the longer plan will give more
predictability for the forest industry.

The Alward government hired two task forces to study Crown land and
private land task force.

Environmental support
David Coon, left, said Natural Resources Minister Bruce Northrup's
forest management strategy is an improvement. (CBC)
Northrup's plan received some cautious praise from the province's
largest environmental group.

David Coon, the executive director of the Conservation Council of New
Brunswick, said he has concerns with the forest management strategy,
but said it is a vast improvement.

"The plan they released today is far better than what the industry was
lobbying for and it is far better than what the Liberals had proposed
when they were they government, he said.

"But it is moving in the wrong direction for most New Brunswickers who
say their number one priority areas are to protect water and to
protect wildlife."

Coon said he's concerned about a reduction of deer wintering areas and
the size of buffer zones around water courses.

The forest, which is set aside for habitat zones and watercourse
buffers, will be reduced to 28 per cent from 30.5 per cent, Coon said.

Industry concerns
Robert Fawcett, the director of forestry relations for J.D. Irving
Ltd., said the forest management plan will mean two mills will remain
closed. (CBC)
Several forest operations in the province have closed in recent months
because in the uncertainty of the industry.

Robert Fawcett, the director of forestry relations for J.D. Irving
Ltd., said its Clair and Deersdale mills will remain closed. He blamed
the extended closure on cost uncertainty in the government's plan.

He said the company is "really concerned" about the impact on its
employees and the communities where its mills operate.

"For us at the moment, our mill capital expansions are put on hold,
Fawcett said.

"We are not going to be able to invest in our facilities today until
we hear a more certain number in terms of the wood that is going to be
available for those facilities."

The closure of the Deersdale mill near Juniper put more than 70 people
out of work in October.

Another 73 people were put out of work in September when J.D. Irving
closed its mill in Clair.

The forest industry had been lobbying to make sure the annual
allowable cut was not reduced.

Last June, J.D. Irving Ltd. organized a petition campaign aimed at
provincial politicians that said hundreds of jobs were at stake if the
provincial government reduces allowable cuts of some types of trees by
25 per cent.

Fawcett said J.D. Irving Ltd. is very concerned about the new
standards that are being put in place, which will make it more
expensive to cut trees in the province.

"We need to be very concerned about the implementation about these new
standards that DNR is putting in place by April 1. These new standards
will increase the cost of harvesting wood significantly," he said.

The new standards will mean younger and smaller trees will be cut,
Fawcett said, which will increase the cost to log, transport and then
process the trees.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/07/23/nb-irving-investment-miramichi-619.html

Miramichi mill has plenty of wood, Irving says
J.Dr. Irving Ltd. spokeswoman says company is not to blame for mill shutdown
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News
Posted: Jul 23, 2013 6:50 AM AT

J.D. Irving Ltd. is forcefully rejecting suggestions that a shift of
some Crown wood to their Chipman mill is to blame for the looming
shutdown of a Miramichi sawmill.

Irving spokesperson Mary Keith says Miramichi Lumber Products has
plenty of its own allocation on Crown lands that it hasn't used.

Miramichi Lumber CFO Hal Raper previously told CBC News that the
licensee operating the public forests in the Miramichi area, Fornebu,
was allowing saw logs to go to JDI, depriving the local mill of that
wood.

The Miramichi Lumber Products mill announced on Friday it was closing
because of a shortage of Crown wood. (CBC)
That prompted a strongly-worded statement from Keith, who called the
suggestion "absolutely false."

"Our company has in fact been working with Miramichi Lumber Products
to buy their wood chips and send saw logs to their mill," said Keith.
"The allocations are a matter of public record and we are fully
compliant."

She said Miramichi Lumber "have never harvested the full amount
allocated to them" in any of the last four years.

The company has not operated year-round in any of the last four years,
which may explain why it hasn't used all of its allocation.

Forestry firms eye $1B in spending, J.D. Irving Ltd. says
Miramichi Lumber Products mill shuts down again
Miramichi Lumber said last week it would shut down this Friday, laying
off 110 people, because it's only been able to secure 40 per cent of
its allocation of wood from publicly-owned forest land.

"Everybody wants more wood," Raper said on Monday. "I think the
government has to decide what their priority is and who they're going
to support."

Raper said Fornebu was able to send logs to Irving because the
province wasn't enforcing usage standards, which set out how much of
the tree can be used for saw logs and how much for stud logs.

'All the allocated users are getting their allocation today as the
government dictates.'--Fornebu CEO Kevin Jewett
For the second straight day, the Department of Natural Resources has
not made anyone available to respond to Raper's comments or to clarify
the complex rules surrounding the use of Crown land.

Fornebu CEO Kevin Jewett also rejected Raper's allegations, saying
Miramichi Lumber is free to cut the wood it needs.

"All the allocated users are getting their allocation today as the
government dictates," he said. "So J.D. Irving is getting the wood
they have the right to take, and MLPI, Hal Raper's mill, has been
given access to the wood that they have the right to take."

Miramichi Mayor Gerry Cormier told CBC News that cabinet minister
Robert Trevors, a Miramichi-area MLA, has promised a fix that will
keep Miramichi Lumber running for four to five weeks.

But Cormier could not say where the wood supply will come from. "You'd
have to ask the minister."

Irving demand for wood supply
Mary Keith, a J.D. Irving Ltd. vice-president, said the company is not
receiving more wood than it should be from Crown licence. (CBC)
Raper's comments came as J.D. Irving Ltd. continued its ongoing push
to get the province to commit to increasing the Crown wood supply for
industry over a longer term.

Last year, Natural Resources Minister Bruce Northrup announced he was
keeping the annual allowable softwood cut at the same level. He also
doubled the normal management plan from five years to 10, to give
companies more predictability.

Irving says that's an improvement, but it doesn't go far enough. Keith
said it doesn't provide "the long-term certainty of wood supply to
warrant hundreds of millions of dollars of investment.

"We need to know the government is interested and is working to grow
the wood supply."

Keith says JDI is one of several forestry companies prepared to invest
a total of almost $1 billion in its facilities, but only if the wood
supply is secure. She said that would include a major upgrade to the
company's Saint John pulp mill.

"We need a longer-term view and a longer-term determination of what
the timber objectives, what the timber supply is going to be, so we
can go forward with investments," Keith said.

Green Party Leader David Coon criticized Irving's "unrelenting demand"
for more wood, pointing to the looming closure of Miramichi Lumber as
a casualty of the company's constant push for growth.

"It's not a question of wood supply," Coon said. "It's a question of
competition for the wood between the big guys and the independents."

http://charlesotherpersonality.blogspot.ca/

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Leader of the Green Party David Coon explains to Blogger of the Crisis
in the Miramichi lumber Market!!!!

Here's the News Release from Liberal MLA Bill Fraser!!


July 22, 2013

Hon. David Alward
Premier - Province of  New Brunswick
PO Box 6000
Fredericton, NB  E3B 5H1

RE:  Miramichi Lumber Crown Allocation

Dear Mr. Premier,

After meeting with officials and employees from Miramichi Lumber on
Thursday and Friday of last week, I feel it necessary to ask for your
immediate intervention into the dire situation they are facing
regarding their crown wood allocation.  It is my understanding that
the licensee, Fornebu, is not following DNR's utilization standard for
saw log allocation.

The employees were notified on Wednesday that the mill would be
closing effective this Friday July 26th, until the saw log allocation
is enforced to the level that will allow the mill to operate. Mr.
Premier, that is more than 110 employees facing unemployment in an
area that has already been hit hard by job loss.

Mr. Premier, in 2010 after you were elected Premier of New Brunswick,
you came to Miramichi and said "we have been saying for a long time
that the Miramichi wood basket must remain in Miramichi for economic
development and job creation. And from day 1 of forming a government
we will be completely focused on this with and for the residents of
the Miramichi and for the private wood lot owners as well, who must
play a part in the future of the region" (as reported in Miramichi
Leader).

The Miramichi region once had several mills operating, each with
adequate access to crown wood and thus, thousands of jobs were
sustained. Today we have two mills operating in Miramichi; Arbec and
Miramichi Lumber, with one facing a closure.

I am at a loss to understand how you can justify the comments you made
in 2010 when now, the actions of your government completely contradict
your previous position and will in turn force the mill to shut down.
It is your government that cannot find enough crown wood in the
Miramichi wood basket to sustain these operations.

From discussions I have had with stakeholders in the industry, I
understand that there is more than enough wood in the Miramichi wood
basket to supply the needs of Arbec, Miramichi Lumber and the former
plywood mill in Nelson who I have been told are also experiencing
difficulty in obtaining enough crown wood to allow them to re-open
(under new ownership).

The Miramichi region has been hit extremely hard and, Mr. Premier, we
simply cannot afford to lose one more job. I am urging you to
immediately intervene in this very serious situation to prevent these
110 + employees from unemployment, and leaving our Province in order
to provide for their families.

If there is anything I can do to assist you in this effort, please, do
not hesitate to ask. I am more than willing to work together on this
matter to see a resolution that will save jobs and sustain the
operations of the Miramichi Lumber Mill.

Sincerely,

Bill Fraser, MLA - Miramichi Bay Du Vin
Official Opposition House Leader
Critic - Department of Transportation & Infrastructure / Government Services

http://www.workingforest.com/fornebu-mill-nb-receives-25-m-provincial-loan/

Fornebu mill in N.B. receives $2.5 M provincial loan
July 04, 2011
By: Telegraph-Journal

A $2.5 million loan for Fornebu Lumber was approved on June 16, not
long before the province announced it would buy Fornebu parent Umoe
Solar's Miramichi assets.

The loan is listed on the same order-in-council (OIC) document that
authorized the government to buy Umoe Solar's assets, although the two
do not otherwise appear linked.

Business New Brunswick spokeswoman Marie-Josee Groulx said the loan
was not linked to negotiations that eventually saw the Umoe purchase
price reduced from $17 million to $10.8 million.

"It's just on the same OIC," said Groulx, who stated she'd been told
by Economic Development Minister Paul Robichaud. "We treat them as two
separate entities. Fornebu is its own operating thing, and Umoe was
its own case file."

The loan will go toward the Bathurst sawmill owned by Fornebu since
taking over all of UPM-Kymmene's former New Brunswick properties,
including the Miramichi site. It is for a period of six years, and
Groulx said the money would be used for a new biomass boiler for the
plant, which currently uses more expensive propane for heat.

The OIC also authorizes the government to buy up the assets at the
site of Umoe Solar's formerly planned polysilicon plant, for a price
of up to $17 million.

That deal was made in 2009 by the former Liberal government, to come
into effect if Umoe Solar had not gone ahead with its planned plant by
January 2011.

Groulx said at the time of the OIC, June 16, the final deal to knock
the price down to $10.8 million hadn't been finalized.

"At that point, we were still on the hook for up to $17 million, as
part of the original agreement, but they were able to negotiate
downwards," she said.

Although Umoe Solar is no more, Fornebu continues to manage the
enormous Crown License 3 formerly managed by UPM.

Miramichi - Bay du Vin MLA Bill Fraser, who was part of the Liberal
government that made the $17 million purchase deal, said Fornebu's
control of the license was linked to creating jobs in Miramichi.

Now that the planned polysilicon plant is no longer a go, he said,
Fornebu's management of the license should be revoked. He said the
Natural Resources Department should take over managing the license,
with Fornebu remaining as a sublicensee.

"If Fornebu is creating jobs, and I believe they are, and
opportunities in the Miramichi region, and I believe they are, I think
that they should continue to use that wood at that site," he said.
"But ... they shouldn't be running the entire allocation. That should
be immediately taken away."

Fraser said he was not made aware of the $17 million purchase deal at
the time it was made in 2009, saying that would have been a cabinet
decision.

He argued the polysilicon plant project failed due to global factors
beyond anyone's control, though he said the failure of the NB Power
deal made matters worse.

He criticized Robichaud for slamming the $17 million purchase
agreement as a "bad deal" for taxpayers.

"I'm very disappointed in Paul Robichaud, you know, criticizing
everything we've done to help the Miramichi."

Department of Natural Resources (DNR) spokeswoman Anne Bull Monteith
said Fornebu has been the manager of the license since 2009. It is
next up for review in March 2012 and does not expire until 2022.

When asked about whether Fornebu could have its license revoked,
Monteith would only say that was not being considered.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 22:47:13 -0300
Subject: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the National
Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanie Horst Sauerteig
talked to that I did not?
To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "mckeen.randy"
<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, news@959sunfm.com, xchief
<xchief@bell.blackberry.net>, minister <minister@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "marie-claude.blais"
<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "john.warr"<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"bernadine.chapman"<bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
mjs837@nyu.edu, hmc <hmc@mediacoop.ca>, wendallnicholas
<wendallnicholas@gmail.com>, ppalmater
<ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>, jrebick <jrebick@politics.ryerson.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes"
<Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "gary.forward"
<gary.forward@fredericton.ca>, "Michelle.Boutin"
<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>,
"fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo"<fortmcmurray.woodbuffalo@assembly.ab.ca>,
deanr0032 <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>,
gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>

From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:29:46 -0300
Subject: Re: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the
National Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
To: Horst Sauerteig <sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca>
Cc: sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, "chris.huskilson"
<chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com \"joe.oliver.c1\""
<joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
<Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett"<rob.bennett@emera.com>,
mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca

FUCK YOU Sauerteig  I don't need your consent

---------- Original message ----------
From: Horst Sauerteig <sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:49:45 -0400
Subject: Re: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the
National Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, "chris.huskilson"
<chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com \"joe.oliver.c1\""
<joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
<Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett"<rob.bennett@emera.com>,
mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca

Please note that Mr. Amos sent this e-mail without my knowledge and/or
consent.

Horst Sauerteig, Wednesday, July 17, 2013

http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/17/mining-interests-blamed/

http://www.nashwaakwatershed.ca/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Communique-classification-des-eaux.pdf

Lawrence Wuest 367 2280

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 05:21:38 -0300
Subject: Do you people want my help YET???
To: CHenschel@cpaws.org, media@cpaws.org, cpawsnb@nb.sympatico.ca,
rclowater@cpaws.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningfredericton/2013/07/15/protected-areas/

http://cpaws.org/news/chapter/nb

Media contact:

Ellen Adelberg
Director of Communications
(613)569-7226 ext. 234
media@cpaws.org

http://www.nben.ca/en/collaborative-action/news-from-groups/itemlist/user/212-Contact:

Roberta Clowater, 506-452-9902;
cpawsnb@nb.sympatico.ca



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 04:45:05 -0300
Subject: EMERA is in constant contact with the regulator the National
Energy Board???? Gee who the hell has the Green Meanies Horst
Sauerteig talked to that I did not?
To: sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, sauertwo@nb.sympatico.ca,
"chris.huskilson"<chris.huskilson@emera.com>, "dave.eby@gmail.com
\"joe.oliver.c1\""<joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>, "Dina.Bartolacci"
<Dina.Bartolacci@emera.com>, "Robert.Trevors"<Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca>,
"bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, musoviczl@repsol.com,
pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com, ottawa@mofa.gov.qa,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
ngodbout@lawsoncreamer.com, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stephen.aftanas@emera.com,
Scott.Balfour@emera.com, "rob.bennett"<rob.bennett@emera.com>,
mel.norton@saintjohn.ca, Kevin.Clifford@saintjohn.ca

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=op2bmd-XXHc

http://www.cbc.ca/informationmorningsaintjohn/2013/07/15/city-not-prepared-for-oil-disaster-possibilites/

Horst Sauerteig
88 Bedell Avenue
Saint John, NB E2K 2C4
Telephone .(506) 658-1326

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/07/15/nb-emera-brunswick-pipeline-safety-717.html

http://brunswickpipeline.com/en/home/ourbusiness/boardofdirectors.aspx

http://lawsoncreamer.com/lawyers/nathalie-godbout/

http://www.zoominfo.com/#!search/profile/person?personId=1413397560&targetid=profile

http://www.conservationcouncil.ca/about-us/eco-heroes/

http://brunswickpipeline.com/en/home/community/saintjohncommunityliaisoncommittee/2008/agendawednesdayfebruary272008.aspx

http://www.canaportlng.com/pdfs/ccelc_minutes_june92008.pdf

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 04:24:21 -0300
Subject: Imagine if David Eby beats Christy Clark this time around I
suspect he will become BC's next Attorney General then Cummins decides
to finally to act ethically and embarasses the hell out the NDP, the
Liberals, Harper, and you EH Mr Plant?
To: "gplant@heenan.ca"<gplant@heenan.ca>, "dave.eby@gmail.com"
<dave.eby@gmail.com>, "elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca"
<elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>, "jchretien@heenan.ca"
<jchretien@heenan.ca>, "rheenan@heenan.ca"<rheenan@heenan.ca>,
"bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com"<bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>,
"broy@ogilvyrenault.com"<broy@ogilvyrenault.com>,
"media@cumminsforbc.ca"<media@cumminsforbc.ca>, "weststar@telus.net"
<weststar@telus.net>, "t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"
<t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "premier@gov.bc.ca"<premier@gov.bc.ca>,
"francoise.raunet@greenparty.bc.ca"
<francoise.raunet@greenparty.bc.ca>, duane <duane@nickull.net>,
"premier@gov.ab.ca"<premier@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
"derek.burney@nortonrose.com"<derek.burney@nortonrose.com>,
"vhuntington@dccnet.com"<vhuntington@dccnet.com>, RBauer
<RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, rtalach@beckettinjurylawyers.com,
mbastarache@heenan.ca, ddexter <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, premier
<premier@gnb.ca>

Hey Mr Plant

Please notice that I added two more pdf files to this email  that all our
surving past and present Prime Ministers and Governor Generals are
well aware of but you may not have seen them.

Remember our conversation and the four emails I sent you one month before
the writ was dropped? It was at about the same time a couple of my enemies
in BC Splitting the Sky and Dougy Baby Christie dropped dead. They were
followed up not long afterwards by none other than Rotten Ralphy Klein?
Does it make me an evil person to be happy that I out lived some of my foes?
You should not deny that Rotten Ralphy's Attorney General got the same
letter and the same a pile of documents and a CD that all the Canadian
Attorney General's received except the Quebecers who turned the Registered
US Mail back 10 times but it was NEVER returned to the USA. Methinks the
RCMP or their pals in CSIS stole my mail just like they have done before and
since. Its rough being a whistleblower. N'esy Pas Mr. Chretien and Mr.
Cutler?

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html

http://www.integritybc.ca/?page_id=276

http://blogs.vancouversun.com/2013/04/23/the-candidate-chronicles-a-friendly-election/

Now to be fair here is one all the lawyers working for the Yankees Al Gore,
Prez Obama and George Soros should review before Birgitta Jonsdotter and her
Wikileaks buddies finally read it..

http://www.scribd.com/doc/5051668/Al-Gore-and-the-boys

Yea I know I am pipe dreaming. I doubt things will change in my lifetime but
what is life with fine dreams? History has proven the Sheeple always get the
governments they deserve when apathy rules the day. However once they start
losing their shirts and have no cake to eat there is always hell to pay and
do roll on occasion. Anyone paying attention can see that the stock
market is at an artificial high created by the greedy Banksters NOT the
economy. Obviously it has nowhere to go but down. Look out when it does.
Even old folks who support Harper and Cummins get pissed when they lose
another big chunk of their precious pensions. But to hell with us old folks
our days
taking advantage of this wonderful old old are winding down anyway. What is
far worse to me is that methinks the "Powers that Be" may let loose the Dogs
of War once again at about the same time the economy crashes. I am not the
only soul predicting this but I have been rather outspoken about this since
2002 when the greedy Yankees attacked my little Clan. Te public record
of my affairs speaks for itself. If my reasoning is correct all of our
children's future will become truly dire indeed. Shame on all you greedy
smiling
bastards if what I believe comes true. Trust that I will hate being correct
but to deny the obvious would make me as foolish as you people.

Pipedream or not the rest of this email is a nightmare for any unethical
lawyer or cop to read or ignore.

Unlike a lawyer or a poltiician I have always trusted my conscience, my
logic and my strange gut feelings.just like the honest cops in the movies
do.
Thus far the senses I was born with have not failed me. So I must confess
the
I have not lost my faith in my fellow common man yet even though I hold much
contempt towarss many low men in high places. My doubts are justifiable but
I
still have hope especially after watching the black guy named Charles talk
about
taking a break from munching on his MacDonald's and playing  his part help
to
save three long lost girls in the USA  It is guys like him that assure me
that we
common folk are not all evil people like the wealthy ones amongst us usually
are.
Charles should run for Congress I suspect he would win by a landslide if a
self
serving Independent can beat BC's Attorney General in the last election/ If
the
sneaky lawyer David Eby beats Christy Clark in her own riding it will only
serve to further prove my point. Need I say I love how the political parties
in BC are creating their own Independent opponents? Too too funny. Seems
that they are bringing about "change" byway of their malicious incompetence.

History as I said earlier has proven the worm always turns on the smiling
bastards. With any luck at all it may happen soon in BC. I know I have done
my part to try to bring about change in BC since 2004.  I still have so many
irons in the fire in so many places to singe some fancy political arses with
that it is quite simply unbelievable. For instance with regards to this
email pipelines in your neck of the woods I know everyone of you checked out
the letters hereto attached but did nothing . Curipusity is a hell of a
thing but you are all afraid of Harper Correct? I doubt many of you greedy
people know about Lenny Hoyt, Emera and Enbridge or Mr. Jones, his Director
Derek Burney within TransCanada versus Mean Old Me. Trust
that it would take me only minutes to explain it to anyone with two clues
between their ears. In fact I have done so to quite few and still they say
and do nothing. Hell the dumb Green Meanies in Canada have understood me
since 2004 and still don't care about the shit that went down between Danny
Boy Williams and I even after he sues some of them. Go figure?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/05/07/nb-enbridge-appeal-rates-leonard.html

http://www.transcanada.com/612.html

http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/193845.pdf

Methinks folks should stop listening to greedy lawyers EH? What say you Mr.
Plant? If you recall our conversation on March 15th you demanded I wrap
things up in a couple of minutes and I promptly did so within 30 seconds or
so then I called your friend Elisabeth Graff and her bosses as well. After
all your Law Firm has had Hard Copy of my material for nearly a year before
you quit politicking as an Attorney General Then Wall Eyed Wally Opal gladly
took your job and in turn got his arse kicked out of office by an incredibly
stupid Independent whom I talked to as well CORRECT Ms Huntington a former
RCMP
Security person and Acting-Chief of Staff to the Solicitor General of
Canada?
What I did not bother telling you Mr. Plant was the the reason I called on
lots
of people the Ides of March. Scroll down and you will see I caught Harper's
minions checking my work that day. Plus I know for a fact the CSE and the
RCMP listen to all my calls so why not give them an earful then prove to
many
others I am paying attention too?

Believe it or not not everybody is a afraid of Mr. Harper and many are
tired of his antics. I heard through the grapevine that I have
gotten some fans amongst the Feds and that maybe someone may use my
documents to blow the whistle. Heres hoping that is true. The sooner I get
my old Harley back and return to being "Just Dave" I am sure many
politicians
and lawyers will breath a sigh of relief. Methinks the CROWN and I should
write an MOU ASAP and then assist me in asking the the Yankees to settle
with as well. What say Mr. Plant? Do you know an old liberal lawyer in YOUR
law firm capable of writing a letter to the Prime Minister and making a deal
with fellow devil on behalf of a Canadian citizen that they purportedly
serve? I do they got this email too and my letter hereto attached. Four of
the
documents are from the Canadian government one is from a very big cheese
and only one is mine Correct?

If no no lawyer takes my side rest assured the Green Meanies South of the
49th heavily financed by George Soros/Swartz are about to be enlightened
much to the chagrin of Harper and Prez Obama and of course my wife's evil
Catholic cousins and their old Yankee buddy John Kerry the current Secretary
of the Sad State of Affairs in the US of A.

http://www.theinquiry.ca/wordpress/settlements/bastarache-conciliation-deals/moncton-dioceses-money-woes-will-worsen-lawyer-says/

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf

 Such is the way of the world and the life and times of a fierce but ethical
political animal. As long as I maintain my Integrity I and tell the truth
all day long
to anyone I choose to then sit back and watch the "Powers That Be" squirm.
Sooner or later somebody will grow some balls and simply say my name in a
Parliament or a Congress or in the corporate media. The love of money
dictates it.
Of that I have no doubt.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369



----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <kristyf@bcconservative2013.ca>; <media@cumminsforbc.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:24 PM
Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and political spats


Media contact:
Andrea Smith
604.897.8478
media@cumminsforbc.ca

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2011/09/16/bc-cummins-attack-ads.html

http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1107310278688-34/Campaign+Briefing+Notes-+Volume+1+Issue+2.pdf

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Dix.MLA, Adrian"<Adrian.Dix.MLA@leg.bc.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:03:21 +0000
Subject: Thank you for your email
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.  This response is to assure you that your
message has been received.

All of my e-mail messages are reviewed on a regular basis. However,
due to the high volume of e-mails received, I may not be able to
respond personally to each one.  To help me serve you better, please
ensure that your e-mail includes your full name, phone number and
street address with your postal code.

To ensure your email is sent to the most appropriate office, a
database of all MLAs, searchable by postal code, is available at the
BC Legislature website:  http://www.leg.bc.ca/mla/3-1-1.htm

Thank you again for taking the time to share your ideas, concerns, and
insight with me. If you require an immediate response or your email is
urgent, please call our office directly at 604-660-0314

Adrian Dix

MLA, Vancouver-Kingsway

Leader, New Democrat Official Opposition

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "elisabeth.graff"<elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "weststar"
<weststar@telus.net>; "premier"<premier@gov.bc.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "t.wilson"
<t.wilson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>; "radical"<radical@radicalpress.com>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:35 PM
Subject: Fwd: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA and
Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians lawyers
Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd Russell and
Claude Aubin versus Mean old me


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:03:04 -0300
Subject: Fwd: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA
and Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians
lawyers Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd
Russell and Claude Aubin versus Mean old me
To: premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, gplant <gplant@heenan.ca>,
lmcgrady@mbwlaw.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "adrian.dix.mla"
<adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 20:08:49 -0300
Subject: RE The Media the VERY Corrupt Justice Depts in the USA and
Canada, the EX PCO Prez Peter Penashue, greedy little politicians
lawyers Indians and Metis such as John Boncore, Pam Palmater, Todd
Russell and Claude Aubin versus Mean old me
To: yvonnejones@gov.nl.ca, "MulcaT@parl.gc.ca"<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>,
"aubinc@cactuscom.com"<aubinc@cactuscom.com>,
"justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com"<policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com>,
"media.karenforcanada@gmail.com"<media.karenforcanada@gmail.com>,
"Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca"<Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca>,
brycefequet@metisnationofcanada.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, trussell
<trussell@nunatukavut.ca>, ppalmater <ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>,
Darcey@metisonline.ca, merv <merv@northwebpress.com>, radical
<radical@radicalpress.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, jacques boucher
<jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/story/2013/03/15/nl-peter-penashue-political-reaction-315.html

http://nlliberals.ca/caucus/cartwright-lanse-au-clair-yvonne-jones-mha/

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "Claude Aubin"<aubinc@cactuscom.com>; "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>;
"marc.garneau.a1"<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>; "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>; "MulcaT"<MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>;
<presse@philippecouillard.com>; <montreal@philippecouillard.com>;
<meerang.rb@gmail.com>; <media@georgetakach.ca>; <info@georgetakach.ca>;
<info@martincauchon.ca>; <media@martincauchon.ca>;
<policy.karenforcanada@gmail.com>; <media.karenforcanada@gmail.com>;
<media@davidbertschi.ca>; <info@pierremoreau.ca>
Cc: <peter.penashue@parl.gc.ca>; <Darcey@metisonline.ca>; <jriche@innu.ca>;
<trussell@nunatukavut.ca>; <minister@aadnc-aandc.gc.ca>;
<ministre@ec.gc.ca>; <Marjory.LeBreton@pco-bcp.gc.ca>;
<DuaneM@metisnation.ca>; <info@pco-bcp.gc.ca>;
<peter.penashue@pco-bcp.gc.ca>; <info@metisnation.ca>;
<brycefequet@metisnationofcanada.com>; <info@claudeaubinmetis.com>; "David
Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "ppalmater"
<ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca>; <news@northwebpress.com>;
<appa@sen.parl.gc.ca>; <bcm@international.gc.ca>; "RBauer"
<RBauer@perkinscoie.com>; "bginsberg"<bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 7:57 PM
Subject: Yo Harper Just exactly how dumb is your French buddy Claude
Aubin????


Just Dave
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 18,799
Domain Name   gc.ca ? (Canada)
IP Address   198.103.111.# (Privy Council Office)
ISP   GTIS
Location   Continent  :  North America
Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
State/Region  :  Ontario
City  :  Ottawa
Lat/Long  :  45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language   English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0
Javascript   version 1.5
Monitor   Resolution  :  1024 x 768
Color Depth  :  24 bits
Time of Visit   Jan 23 2013 5:10:21 pm
Last Page View   Jan 23 2013 5:12:20 pm
Visit Length   1 minute 59 seconds
Page Views   2
Referring URL  http://www.google.ca...248874,d.aWc&cad=rja
Search Engine  google.ca
Search Words  david amos
Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blo...per-and-bankers.html
Out Click
Time Zone   UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time   Jan 23 2013 4:10:21 pm
Visit Number   18,799

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: "elisabeth.graff"<elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "weststar"
<weststar@telus.net>; "premier"<premier@gov.bc.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; "david.akin"
<david.akin@sunmedia.ca>
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 9:33 PM
Subject: Fwd: DOD Auditor General and alan.white@cbc.ca


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:29:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: DOD Auditor General and   alan.white@cbc.ca
To: "alan.white@cbc.ca"<alan.white@cbc.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>

Just Dave
By Location > Visit Detail
Visit 19,128
Domain Name   dnd.ca ? (Canada)
IP Address   131.137.247.# (Defence Research Establishment-Ottawa)
ISP   Defense Research Establishment
Location   Continent  :  North America
Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
State/Region  :  Ontario
City  :  Ottawa
Lat/Long  :  45.4167, -75.7 (Map)
Language   English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727;
InfoPath.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
3.5.30729; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
Javascript   version 1.3
Monitor   Resolution  :  1280 x 800
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
Last Page View   Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL
http://www.bing.com/search?q=alan.white@cbc.ca&src=IE-SearchBox
Search Engine  bing.com
Search Words  alan.white@cbc.ca
Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/10/for-record.html
Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/10/for-record.html
Out Click
Time Zone   UTC-4:00
Visitor's Time   Mar 15 2013 3:16:44 pm
Visit Number   19,128

QSLS Politics
By Location > Visit Detail
Visit 30,501
Domain Name   gc.ca ? (Canada)
IP Address   192.197.72.# (Office of the Auditor General of Canada)
ISP   Office of the Auditor General of Canada
Location   Continent  :  North America
Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
State/Region  :  Quebec
City  :  Gatineau
Lat/Long  :  45.4833, -75.65 (Map)
Language   English (Canada) en-ca
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Internet Explorer 8.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR
3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E)
Javascript   version 1.3
Monitor   Resolution  :  1613 x 1008
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Mar 15 2013 7:10:33 pm
Last Page View   Mar 15 2013 7:15:45 pm
Visit Length   5 minutes 12 seconds
Page Views   3
Referring URL
Visit Entry Page
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
Visit Exit Page
http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html
Out Click
Time Zone   UTC-4:00
Visitor's Time   Mar 15 2013 2:10:33 pm
Visit Number   30,501

Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 13:08:42 -0800 (PST)
From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
Subject: So do ya think Harper ordered CBC to ignore me or Heenan? (: Or
could it be Dick Cheney :)
To: Ombudsman@cbc.ca, ombudsman@radio-canada.ca,
newsroom@allheadlinenews.com, jromanelli@hfxnews.ca, cfleming@hfxnews.ca,
pramsay@amherstdaily.com, Dion.S@parl.gc.ca, Martin.Paul@parl.gc.ca,
Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, Volpe.J@parl.gc.ca, Brison.S@parl.gc.ca,
Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, egarris2@antiwar.com, btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca,
Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com,
martine.turcotte@bell.ca, premier@gov.ns.ca, McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca
CC: tjconnel@gannett.com, jchretien@heenan.ca, rheenan@heenan.ca,
bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com, broy@ogilvyrenault.com,
kmearn@mpdmilton.org, governorlynch@nh.gov, mayor@ci.boston.ma.us,
kinsella@stu.ca, mcomeau@stu.ca, ruby@ruby-edwardh.com,
Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca, Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca,
atlantic@ctv.ca, smurphy@ctv.ca, Eyking.M@parl.gc.ca, Keddy.G@parl.gc.ca,
Regan.G@parl.gc.ca, Savage.M@parl.gc.ca, Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca,
news-tips@nytimes.com, foreign@nytimes.com, dinoratt@telus.net,
editor@thetyee.ca

It has been a couple of days since the one honest lady and from CBC emailed
me and
nobody calls while the Feds kill my email account?

Don't that just piss me off  when I see you checking my work to beat the the
band?

What are you doing in Upper Canada?

Are ya waiting for me to blog your nonsense or just sue ya?

David Raymond Amos <davidramos@xplornet.com> wrote:

From: "David Raymond Amos"<davidramos@xplornet.com>
To: <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>, <newsroom@nbpub.com>,
<carl.davies@gnb.ca>,
<janet.trail@gnb.ca>, <Akoschany@ctv.ca>, <jtravers@thestar.ca>,
<warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com>,
<Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Spinks Spinks"<spinks08@hotmail.com>, <seanoshaughnessy@rogers.com>,
<jonesr@cbc.ca>, <mleger@stu.ca>, <jwalker@stu.ca>, <plee@stu.ca>,
<dwatch@web.net>, <Duane.Rousselle@unb.ca>, <oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com>,
<btaylor@nbnet.nb.ca>, <trenchcoatblog@yahoo.ca>, <Jack.Keir2@gnb.ca>,
<advocacycollective@yahoo.com>, <MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca>,
<collins.moncton-east@hotmail.com>, <wally.stiles@gnb.ca>,
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, <kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, <greg.byrne@gnb.ca>,
<Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca>, <Bernard.Richard@gnb.ca>,
<abel.leblanc@gnb.ca>, <eugene.mcginley2@gnb.ca>, <Scott.A@parl.gc.ca>,
<John.Foran@gnb.ca>, <premier@gnb.ca>, <Hermenegilde.Chiasson@gnb.ca>,
<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
<chris.goodwin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <info@cisnb-srcnb.ca>,
<bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
CC: <bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <Oda.B@parl.gc.ca>,
<paul.dube@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Henry McCandless"<hemccand@shaw.ca>,
<dwatch@web.net>, <president@utoronto.ca>, <rbrant@mccarthy.ca>,
<bsullivan@wc.com>, <jimwilson@telus.net>, <info@lymedisease.org>,
<lbj1@pacbell.net>, <ottawa@chuckstrahl.com>, <riding@chuckstrahl.com>,
, <bpel@mccarthy.ca>, <Catboat15@aol.com>,
<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>, <Dykstra.R@parl.gc.ca>,
<solberg.m@parl.gc.ca>, <thompson.g@parl.gc.ca>, <toews.v@parl.gc.ca>,
<Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>, <ruby@ruby-edwardh.com>,
<fbinhct@leo.gov>, <patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov>,
<Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov>,
<stephen.cutler@wilmerhale.com>, <olived@sen.parl.gc.ca>,
<bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, <broy@ogilvyrenault.com>,
<cumby.meghan@dailygleaner.com>, <stronach.b@parl.gc.ca>,
<day.s@parl.gc.ca>, <duffy@ctv.ca>,
<tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com>, <mikemurphymla@hotmail.com>,
<dykstrafarms@hotmail.com>
Subject: Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp known as CBC
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 13:22:27 -0400

----- Original Message -----
From: David Raymond Amos
To: office@AJAs.ca
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 9:38 AM
Subject: Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp known as CBC



----- Original Message -----
From: "Ombudsman de Radio-Canada"<ombudsman@radio-canada.ca>
To: "David Raymond Amos"<davidramos@xplornet.com>
Cc: "CBC Ombudsman"<Ombudsman@cbc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 12:00 PM
Subject: {Spam?} Rép. : Fw: Gotcha now watch me embarass the Crown Corp
known as CBC


Dear Sir:

 I write to acknowledge receipt of your e-mail and your voice mail, which I
have shared with the office of the Ombudsman of the English network. It will
follow up with your request.
For more information, you can consult CBC Ombudsman's web site:
http://www.cbc.ca/ombudsman/

Best regards,

Laure Simonet
Assistant of the Ombudsman, French Services
Société Radio-Canada

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:47:29 -0400
Subject: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and political spats
To: andrew.weaver@greenparty.bc.ca, leader@greenparty.bc.ca,
weaver@ocean.seos.uvic.ca, ida.chong.mla@leg.bc.ca,
michael.byers@ubc.ca, colivier@theprovince.com, leader
<leader@greenparty.ca>, leader <leader@actionparty.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, editor@desmogblog.com,
judy@yesbc.ca, mhager@postmedia.com

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Green+Party+candidate+pressured+election/7691565/story.html#axzz2Eyjd6DI9

http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Star+Green+party+candidate+Andrew+Weaver+says+Democrat+asked/7691247/story.html

http://www.theprovince.com/news/Green+Party+candidate+pressured+election/7691565/story.html#axzz2Eyjd6DI9

http://www.desmogblog.com/weaver-sues-tim-ball-libel

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <josh@bccla.org>; <Carmen@bccla.org>; <sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>;
<gaetan.caron@neb-one.gc.ca>; <ted@tedhsu.ca>; <Ted.Hsu@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; <gplant@heenan.ca>;
<elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>; "joe.oliver.c1"<joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:56 PM
Subject: Perhap somebody should ask Joe Oliver some serious questions ASAP
EH Ted Hsu?


http://bccla.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/20130114-NEB-Letter.pdf

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
To: <gplant@heenan.ca>; <james@jameskeller.ca>; <dbennett@cp.org>
Cc: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>;
<sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>; <elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca>
Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 4:35 PM
Subject: The lawyer Leggett and her legal cohorts are too too funny
sometimes EH Mr Plant?


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/09/06/bc-geoff-plant-enbridge-hearings.html?cmp=rss

http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=5119

Geoff Plant, Q.C.bPartner
Vancouver 604 891.1186
Victoria 250 381.9321
gplant@heenan.ca


http://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/contact/elisabeth-graff-654409/

Elisabeth Graff
Solicitor
Called to the bar: 2008 (BC)
Justice (BC), Min. of
Abor. Law - Environ., Resource & Abor. Law Group
PO Box 9220, Stn. Prov. Govt
Victoria, British Columbia V8W 9J1
Phone: 250-356-1155 Ext:
Fax: 250-356-8939
Email: elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca

http://www.ipe.ualberta.ca/en/EventsandSeminars/ChinaandIndiaGlobalPowerShiftO/SpeakerProfiles/JohnCarruthers.aspx

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+Attorney+General+Geoff+Plant+represent+Northern+Gateway+hearings/7199978/story.html

http://www.thecanadianpress.com/english/marketing/contacts/CPContactsEnglish.pdf

http://www.jameskeller.ca/contact/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-lawyer-grills-northern-gateway-president-on-enbridges-liability/article4526907/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:07:18 -0300
Subject: BTW Heather Remember when Harper stopped the BHP Potash deal?
To: martinhea39@gmail.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:44:45 -0300
Subject: I just called from 902 800 0369 Perhaps the Qatari Embassy
should study the attachments closely EH Mr Alward?
To: musoviczl@repsol.com, pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com
Cc: ottawa@mofa.gov.qa, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
leader <leader@greenparty.ca>

Qatari Embassy in Ottawa, Canada
800-150 Metcalfe Street
Ottawa Ontario K2P 1P1
Telephone (+1) 613 241 4917
 E-mail ottawa@mofa.gov.qa
http://www.repsolenergy.com/rena_team/rena_team.html

http://www.repsolenergy.com/press_room/press_room.html

http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/kuwait-koweit/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/fs-qatar-fd.aspx?lang=eng&view=d

http://www.nccar.ca/statements/news-releases/establishment-of-the-embassy-of-qatar-in-canadaune-ambassade-du-qatar-a-ottawa/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 01:07:11 -0400
Subject: YO Nathan Cullen WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPORTING,
JOURNALISM AND PROPAGANDA???
To: cullen1 <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, gsmith@classicrockcfnr.ca,
dquan@postmedia.com, merv@northwebpress.com, charlie@straight.com, pm
<pm@pm.gc.ca>, president@ubcic.bc.ca,
palmater@indigenousnationhood.com, ppalmater@politics.ryerson.ca,
radical <radical@radicalpress.com>, hjk <hjk@quesnelbc.com>,
"macpherson.don"<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>,
"mclaughlin.heather"<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>, acampbell
<acampbell@ctv.ca>, "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, Jessica Hume
<jessica.hume@sunmedia.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, vivian.krause@mac.com,
Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org

I believe that only propaganda exists these days. The other two terms
are merely myths that bullshitters use to jusify greedy wordsmiths who
try to wax poetic for whomever will pay them the most. If all else
fails the corporations hire the cheapest help they can get for local
events and just cut and paste and print and pay some other dude for
the fancy words to elp sell their newsrag. Original thought and common
sense evaporated with veritical intigration or whatever the evil
corporate bastards wish to call these days.

http://www.ubcic.bc.ca/about/executive.htm#axzz2Gn4tlS9t

Perhaps some clever Indian in BC will ask me why I ran against Andy
Scott when he was the Minister of Indian Affairs EH John Duncan? I see
folks in your neck of the woods checking my work alot lately. No doubt
some of it is because of the upcoming election and the doings between
me and the Wally Opal and the RCMP back in 2005. However there is the
doings between the NEB and I in 2006 but that bullshit only involves
mere matters of money and the environment. YOU cannot deny that the
Minister of Indian Affairs has had Hard Copy of my concerns since 2004
and THAT involves the Captial Crime known and MURDER. YOUR head office
is in Amherst Nova Scotia which well within MY stomping gounds. Thus
that is where I will serve you the summons in order to bring the RCMP
and your lawyers to Federal Court CORRECT Minister Duncan? Perhaps you
should call the RCMP in Amherst Nova Scotia and ask them about the
documents and CD I served on them with a witness who has my Durable
Power of Attorney in August of 2012 in order to bring everything up to
date.

FYI its mostly the same materail that Wally Opal and the lawyer
Shirley Heafey as the Commissioer of Public Complaints Against the
RCMP received byway of registered US Mail (signature required) in 2005

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/06/david-amos-vs-bcs-liberal-premier.html

http://www.scribd.com/doc/7625653/Indian-Affairs

http://www.straight.com/news/grand-chief-stewart-phillip-stephen-harper-attacked-first-nations-rights-2012

http://www.terracedaily.ca/show10549a0x300y1z/THE_DIFFERENCE_BETWEEN_REPORTING_JOURNALISM_AND_PROPAGANDA_

http://www.classicrockcfnr.ca/index.php/on-air/nationview-journeys-archives/

Air Date: December 14, 2012
The Union of BC Indian Chiefs has announced they are ready and willing
to take legal action against the Federal Government over concerns of
the potential Canada-China Foreign Investment Promotion & Protection
Agreement (FIPPA). President of the UBCIC Grand Chief Stewart Phillip
explains what a potential international free-trade agreement would
mean for the environment and country. Meanwhile Reporter Jon Brown
speaks with BC Conservative Leader John Cummins who's making a
northern tour.

Interview Segment: Grand Chief Stewart Phillip & Conservative Leader
John Cummins

http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/srch/nvgt.do?lang=eng&prtl=1&sbPrtl=&estblmntNo=123456126441&profile=cmpltPrfl&profileId=501&app=sold

QSLS Politics
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 29,838
Domain Name   shawcable.net ? (Network)
IP Address   70.67.22.# (Shaw Communications)
ISP   Shaw Communications
Location   Continent  :  North America
Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
State/Region  :  British Columbia
City  :  Comox
Lat/Long  :  49.6833, -124.9333 (Map)
Language   English (U.K.) en-gb
Operating System   Microsoft WinNT
Browser   Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0
Javascript   version 1.5
Monitor   Resolution  :  1366 x 768
Color Depth  :  24 bits
Time of Visit   Dec 26 2012 10:28:18 pm
Last Page View   Dec 26 2012 10:28:18 pm
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL  http://www.google.ca...LAqq-gLgM&usg=AFQjCN
Search Engine  google.ca
Search Words  whistle blower charged with defamation bc
Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....es-libel-charge.html
Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....es-libel-charge.html
Out Click
Time Zone   UTC-8:00
Visitor's Time   Dec 26 2012 1:28:18 pm
Visit Number   29,838


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 02:00:26 -0400
Subject: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan Cullen
To: vivian.krause@mac.com, joel@renewalpartners.com, "ross.mcmillan"
<ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org>, charlie@straight.com,
"gregor.robertson"<gregor.robertson@vancouver.ca>,
info@forestethics.org, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca,
harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca
Cc: cullen1@parl.gc.ca, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oig
<oig@sec.gov>, oig <oig@ftc.gov>, todd@forestethics.org

http://forestethics.org/todd-paglia-executive-director-responds-lastest-news-canada

Cullen to question Enbridge, government at JRP in February
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
DECEMBER 12, 2012

Prince Rupert - MP Nathan Cullen will next appear before the National
Energy Board's Enbridge Joint Review Panel (JRP) in February.

Cullen will question witnesses from Enbridge on emergency preparedness
and response mechanisms that would be established to deal with oil
spills.

Later in the spring, Cullen will also cross-examine Department of
Fisheries and Oceans officials about federal assessments of the
project's environmental impacts.

JRP hearings continue in Prince Rupert this week and are set to resume
there on February 4.  The panel will sit for two-week rotations until
early spring and must issue its recommendation by the end of 2013.


- 30 -

Contact: Shelley Browne, cullen1@parl.gc.ca 250-877-4140


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:31:34 -0300
Subject: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the left
versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
To: kcryderman@calgaryherald.com, tips@660news.com,
david.cournoyer@gmail.com, Lee.Richardson@gov.ab.ca,
jason.kenney.c1@parl.gc.ca, Elizabeth.May.C1@parl.gc.ca,
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, leader
<leader@actionparty.ca>, donn@petroxcapital.ca,
albertadiary@gmail.com, support@erinotoole.ca, editor@oakbaynews.com,
info@joancrockatt.ca
Cc: vin@vincentstpierre.com, rahim@tedxcalgary.ca,
harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
datkins@oceancapitalpartners.com, galloway@uvic.ca,
paulsummerville@shaw.ca, mrankin@murrayrankin.ca,
murray@murrayrankinndp.ca, elizabeth@elizabethcull.ca,
charleyberesford@gmail.com, loriacreative@yahoo.com,
info@innermusica.com, rscollis@gmail.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By-elections_to_the_41st_Canadian_Parliament#cite_note-Kady-20

http://victoriavision.blogspot.ca/

http://alberta.ca/albertafiles/includes/directorysearch/goaBrowse.cfm?txtSearch=Executive%20Branch&Ministry=EXC&LevelID=17734&userid=106619

http://www.calgaryliberal.com/2012/09/14/liberal-nomination-12-the-race-for-calgary-centre/

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/politics/Liberals+choose+candidate+Calgary+Centre/7277510/story.html

http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2012/09/strikebreaker-condemns-joan-crockatt-for-role-in-calgary-herald-strike/

http://daveberta.ca/2012/08/calgary-centre-nomination-update/


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 19:31:34 -0300
Subject: RE The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines, the by elections of the left
versus Harper & cohorts Anyone remember me?
To: kcryderman@calgaryherald.com, tips@660news.com,
david.cournoyer@gmail.com, Lee.Richardson@gov.ab.ca,
jason.kenney.c1@parl.gc.ca, Elizabeth.May.C1@parl.gc.ca,
Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Joe.oliver.c1@parl.gc.ca, leader
<leader@actionparty.ca>, donn@petroxcapital.ca,
albertadiary@gmail.com, support@erinotoole.ca, editor@oakbaynews.com,
info@joancrockatt.ca
Cc: vin@vincentstpierre.com, rahim@tedxcalgary.ca,
harvey@harveylocke.com, donn.lovett@gmail.com,
datkins@oceancapitalpartners.com, galloway@uvic.ca,
paulsummerville@shaw.ca, mrankin@murrayrankin.ca,
murray@murrayrankinndp.ca, elizabeth@elizabethcull.ca,
charleyberesford@gmail.com, loriacreative@yahoo.com,
info@innermusica.com, rscollis@gmail.com

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By-elections_to_the_41st_Canadian_Parliament#cite_note-Kady-20

http://victoriavision.blogspot.ca/

http://alberta.ca/albertafiles/includes/directorysearch/goaBrowse.cfm?txtSearch=Executive%20Branch&Ministry=EXC&LevelID=17734&userid=106619

http://www.calgaryliberal.com/2012/09/14/liberal-nomination-12-the-race-for-calgary-centre/

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/politics/Liberals+choose+candidate+Calgary+Centre/7277510/story.html

http://beaconnews.ca/calgary/2012/09/strikebreaker-condemns-joan-crockatt-for-role-in-calgary-herald-strike/

http://daveberta.ca/2012/08/calgary-centre-nomination-update/

From: Josipa Petrunic <enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca>
Subject: Follow up
To: "David Amos"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Received: Sunday, June 5, 2011, 8:45 PM

Dear David,

Apologies for the delay in my response. This week was jammed with
board meetings for our riding and a massive volunteer appreciation BBQ
that we held yesterday. I'm just catching up on messages now.

Apropos the information you sent to me, I found it very interesting.
In fact, here in Calgary East, I'm planning a series of
workshops/public lectures that look at "Corruption in Canada". My
policy team and I are meeting this week to discuss the items you sent
to me and your case in particular to see what we can do in terms of,
at least, bringing some public awareness to this case and other cases
of corruption and questionable practices in Canadian governance and
government relations with businesses.

Do make sure to send us a follow up on what you decide to do, apropos
your proposed law suit. I will share the information with my team.

As my own follow up question, though, why have you sent me this
material as opposed to approaching your local MP and/or Liberal
candidate? Surely others would be interested too.

I know Ted. He's a great person and he'll be a wonderful MP. Do let me
know what transpires on that front.

Best of luck in your efforts. We'll chat soon,

Josipa
--
Josipa Petrunic
Liberal Party Candidate
Federal constituency of Calgary East
www.josipapetrunic.ca
www.facebook.com/votejosipa
Phone: 403-719-6253

From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Subject: Josipa I will try calling you again (902 800 0369) BTW I am
not a local nor am I a liberal
To: enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca
Cc: ted@tedhsu.ca, David Amos
Received: Monday, May 23, 2011, 10:38 PM

Say hey to Ted Hsu

I explained myself to your sister Ana ( who was quite nice) She
obviously told you I had called after you responded to my first emaiI.
She told me you were heading out to debate that night so I sent you
the email with the attachemnt about BHP and Potash Corp so you could
embarass some Conservatives as to why Harper stopped the hostile
takeover last year but clearly you did not read it in time for the
election but there is still a bit of time to stir the pot before the
Speech from the Throne in June

Anyway to answer your question I am the whistleblower that inspired
this hearing in Washington DC before I came home and ran for public
office 4 times in Canada between 2004 and 2006 then got stuck here
without my wife and kids

http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=102e41a1-f540-4ce5-a701-b6d09b7606b1

http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2

The first email I sent you had this pdf file attached and Ted got it too.

www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.pdf

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

P.S. The rest of this email and its attachment contains just one of
the reasons Stockwell Day quit.

From: Josipa Petrunic <enquiries@josipapetrunic.ca>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 17:26:34 -0400
Subject: Reading your message
To: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Hi David -

I just heard your message (sort of) on the telephone.
Unfortunately the line is garbled and all I could hear was your name and
a mention of a Senate website site. The rest is mostly garbled for some
reason and I can't make out your phone number or the website you were
trying to direct me towards. Were you on a cell phone, by chance? It
sounds like digital interference on the phone.

That said, I have indeed scanned through the emails you sent to me,
but I have a number of questions, as the order of the emails is all
over the place and it's
hard for me to track what happened when and who you were responding to
at certain times.

I thought that it might be easier for you to come to
one of our meetings (i.e. our board meeting on June 1st). We always
leave a slot of time for people from the community, like yourself, to
talk about issues thought to be important and which we, as Liberals, can
talk about.

Indeed, as I'm developing a lecture series for Calgary
East right now, it might be worthwhile having you succinctly explain the
situation and your role in whistleblowing, so that I can grasp the
issues at hand.

In the meantime, could you email me your number and a
link to the website you mentioned. I can start by looking at the site.

Cheers, Josipa
---
Josipa Petrunic
Liberal Party Candidate
Federal
constituency of Calgary East
www.josipapetrunic.ca [1]
www.facebook.com/votejosipa [2]
Phone: 403-719-6253


From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: Ted perhaps you should mention this email to the lawyers
Sean Casey, Dominic Leblanc, Bob Rae and Ralph Goodale ASAP
To: ted@tedhsu.ca
Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
Received: Friday, May 20, 2011, 2:33 PM

When you responded once again to the earlier email I figured it was
not you who blocked the email I was calling about. Ask yourself who
blocked this email to you and why. BTW after I called you and left a
message about this I did as I promised and called Bob Rae's office as
well. He did ot call me back but i saw his help checking my work on
the web while we talked.

Best Regards
Dave

--- On Thu, 5/19/11, Ted Hsu <ted@tedhsu.ca> wrote:


From: Ted Hsu <ted@tedhsu.ca>
Subject: Re: Ted I figured out it was you who called me back (613 544 8450)
To: "David Amos"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Received: Thursday, May 19, 2011, 8:18 PM


Hello David,


I'm going to go over the contents of your email.


Regards,


Ted Hsu


On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:30 PM, David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
wrote:

Congrats on two fronts.

One for getting elected

Two and more importantly to me is the fact that you are the only
elected politician to returm a call to me this year. No joke.

That fact alone proves to me that you are the only person who should
be the liberal leader and our next Prime Minister No joking again.

because you acted ethiclly with me I will keep this email in
confidence until we get a chance to talk.

Best Regards
Dave

Please study the text of the email when you get the time but checkout
the pdf files attached ASAP before the 41st Parliament sits would be
wise

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 00:34:44 -0300
Subject: never-mind-northern-gateway-keystone-xl
To: albertadiary <albertadiary@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://albertadiary.ca/2012/01/never-mind-northern-gateway-keystone-xl_17.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2012 16:35:46 -0300
Subject: The lawyer Leggett and her legal cohorts are too too funny
sometimes EH Mr Plant?
To: gplant@heenan.ca, james@jameskeller.ca, dbennett@cp.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca, elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/story/2012/09/06/bc-geoff-plant-enbridge-hearings.html?cmp=rss

http://www.heenanblaikie.com/en/ourTeam/bio?id=5119

Geoff Plant, Q.C.bPartner
Vancouver 604 891.1186
Victoria 250 381.9321
gplant@heenan.ca


http://www.canadianlawlist.com/listingdetail/contact/elisabeth-graff-654409/

Elisabeth Graff
Solicitor
Called to the bar: 2008 (BC)
Justice (BC), Min. of
Abor. Law - Environ., Resource & Abor. Law Group
PO Box 9220, Stn. Prov. Govt
Victoria, British Columbia V8W 9J1
Phone: 250-356-1155 Ext:
Fax: 250-356-8939
Email: elisabeth.graff@gov.bc.ca

http://www.ipe.ualberta.ca/en/EventsandSeminars/ChinaandIndiaGlobalPowerShiftO/SpeakerProfiles/JohnCarruthers.aspx

http://www.vancouversun.com/news/Former+Attorney+General+Geoff+Plant+represent+Northern+Gateway+hearings/7199978/story.html

http://www.thecanadianpress.com/english/marketing/contacts/CPContactsEnglish.pdf

http://www.jameskeller.ca/contact/

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/bc-lawyer-grills-northern-gateway-president-on-enbridges-liability/article4526907/

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
To: <sheila.leggett@neb-one.gc.ca>; <gaetan.caron@neb-one.gc.ca>;
<rowland.harrison@neb-one.gc.ca>; <john.bulger@neb-one.gc.ca>;
<kenneth.bateman@neb-one.gc.ca>; <roland.george@neb-one.gc.ca>;
<georgette.habib@neb-one.gc.ca>; <david.hamilton@neb-one.gc.ca>;
<kenneth.vollman@neb-one.gc.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 1:02 PM
Subject: We just talked Ms. Legget I must say you picked a bad day to
play dumb EH?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 23:07:18 -0300
Subject: BTW Heather Remember when Harper stopped the BHP Potash deal?
To: martinhea39@gmail.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:44:45 -0300
Subject: I just called from 902 800 0369 Perhaps the Qatari Embassy
should study the attachments closely EH Mr Alward?
To: musoviczl@repsol.com, pribbeck@repsol.com, vcmorrissettem@repsol.com
Cc: ottawa@mofa.gov.qa, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>,
leader <leader@greenparty.ca>

Qatari Embassy in Ottawa, Canada
800-150 Metcalfe Street
Ottawa Ontario K2P 1P1
Telephone (+1) 613 241 4917
 E-mail ottawa@mofa.gov.qa
http://www.repsolenergy.com/rena_team/rena_team.html

http://www.repsolenergy.com/press_room/press_room.html

http://www.canadainternational.gc.ca/kuwait-koweit/bilateral_relations_bilaterales/fs-qatar-fd.aspx?lang=eng&view=d

http://www.nccar.ca/statements/news-releases/establishment-of-the-embassy-of-qatar-in-canadaune-ambassade-du-qatar-a-ottawa/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Alan Dark <Alan.Dark@cbc.ca>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:57:14 -0400
Subject: Re: I just called from 902 800 0369 and tried to talk to you
Mr Tomick (Out of office)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.  Please be advised that I am currently out of
the office; returning Monday Agust 27th.

If your matter is urgent, please contact Camilla Inderberg at
416-205-5545 or by email camilla.inderberg@cbc.ca or Janice Smith
416-205-2940 or janice.smith@cbc.ca

Best regards,
Al



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:03:50 -0300
Subject: Ask yourself why CBC would report none of this
To: kim_woima@nexeninc.com, "greg.weston"<greg.weston@cbc.ca>,
jack.tomik@cbc.ca, alan.dark@cbc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jacques_poitras
<jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>

You do know Landslide Annie is on the Board of Directors of Nexen I hope

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/08/20/f-scott-peterson-cnooc-nexen.html


http://www.nexeninc.com/en/Governance/BoardofDirectors/BoardBios.aspx
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:17:20 -0300
Subject: Re Danny Williams Vs the Sierra Club Very Interesting lawsuit
and counterclaim EH Mr Bennnett
To: jb@sierraclub.ca, lgue@davidsuzuki.org, grenouf
<grenouf@genuinewitty.com>, editor@theindependent.ca
Cc: jbaker@ottenheimerbaker.com, info@alderonironore.com,
ktsakumis@alderonironore.com, "pgleeson@alderonironore.com \"David
Amos\""<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, jvettese@casselsbrock.com

http://thechronicleherald.ca/canada/125139-muskrat-falls-critic-countersues-williams

http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/node/4542

FYI I just call Bruno Marcocchio @ 902-567-1132 and he had no clue as
to what I was talking about However trust that just like Gretchen
Fitzgerald, Danny Williams and his corporate pals know EXACTLY who I
am and why I was calling.

http://www.tmx.com/en/news_events/exchange_bulletins/bulletins/10-7-2011_TSX-NewListingADV.html

http://alderonironore.com/corporate/board_directors/

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.ca/2008/05/nfld-whistleblower-dodges-libel-charge.html

2005 01 T 0010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR
TRIAL DIVISION
BETWEEN:

WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF
AND:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT

AND BETWEEN:
BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT/PLAINTIFF
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF/FIRST DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: T. ALEX HICKMAN SECOND DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: THOMAS MARSHALL THIRD DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: DANNY WILLIAMS FOURTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: EDWARD M. ROBERTS FIFTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: JOHN CROSBIE SIXTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

AND: PATTERSON PALMER SEVENTH DEFENDANT
BY COUNTERCLAIM

SUMMARY OF CURRENT DOCUMENT

Court File Number(s):2005 01 T 0010

Date of Filing of Document: 25 January 2005

Name of Filing Party or Person: Stephen J. May

Application to which Document being filed relates: Amended Application
of the Plaintiff/Defendant by Counterclaim to maintain an Order
restricting publication, to strike portions of the Statement of
Defence, strike the Counterclaim in it's entirety, and to refer this
proceeding to case management.

Statement of purpose in filing: To maintain an Order restricting
publication, to strike portions of the Statement of Defence, strike
the Counterclaim in its entirety and refer this proceeding to case
management.

A F F I D A V I T

I, Stephen J. May, of the City of St. John's, in the Province of
Newfoundland and Labrador, Barrister and Solicitor, make oath and say
as follows:

THAT I am a Partner in the St. John's office of PATTERSON PALMER
solicitors for William Matthews, the Member of Parliament for
Random-Burin-St. George's in the Parliament of Canada.

THAT Mr. Matthews originally retained Mr. Edward Roberts, Q.C. on or
about 30 April 2002 after Mr. Byron Prior, the Defendant/Plaintiff by
Counterclaim, had made allegations against Mr. Matthews in a
publication called "My Inheritance - The truth - Not Fiction: A Town
with a Secret". In that publication, the allegation was made that Mr.
Matthews had had sex with a girl who had been prostituted by her
mother. That girl was alleged to have been Mr. Prior's sister.

THAT upon being retained, Mr. Edward Roberts wrote a letter to Mr.
Prior. That letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "1" to my
Affidavit.

THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts' letter to Mr. Prior, Mr. Roberts
received a 1 May 2002 e-mail from Mr. Prior. That e-mail is attached
as Exhibit "2".

THAT subsequent to Mr. Roberts receipt of the e-mail, Mr. Prior swore
an Affidavit acknowledging that what had been said in that publication
was false. That Affidavit is attached as Exhibit "3" to my Affidavit.
Following Mr. Roberts' receipt of that Affidavit, Mr. Matthews advised
that he was satisfied not to pursue the matter any further and our
firm closed our file.

THAT on or about 25 October 2004, I was retained by Mr. Matthews
following his gaining knowledge that a web site, made a series of
allegations against him relating to my having sex with a girl of
approximately 12 years old through to an approximate age of 15 years
old. It also accused him of being a father of one of her children and
accused him of having raped that girl. Upon checking the web site I
saw that Byron Prior, the Defendant, had been identified as the author
of the material on the site.

THAT Mr. Matthews instructed me to write Mr. Prior, to remind him of
the fact that the allegations had been admitted to being false through
a 16 May 2002 Affidavit to advise him of Mr. Matthews' intentions to
commence legal proceedings if the comments were not removed from the
web site. A copy of my letter to Mr. Prior is attached as Exhibit "4"
to this Affidavit.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "5" a transcript from a 5 November 2004
voicemail left by David Amos, identified in the voicemail as a friend
of Mr. Prior.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "6" a portion of a 6 November 2004 e-mail
from Mr. Amos.

THAT until I received his voicemail and e-mail, I had never heard of Mr.
Amos.

THAT Mr. Amos has continued to send me e-mail since his 5 November
e-mail. Including his 6 November 2004 e-mail, I have received a total
of 15 e-mails as of 23 January 2005. All do not address Mr. Matthews'
claim or my involvement as Mr. Matthews' solicitor. I attach as
Exhibit "7" a portion of a 12 January 2005 e-mail that Mr. Amos sent
to me but originally came to my attention through Ms. Lois Skanes
whose firm had received a copy. This e-mail followed the service of
the Statement of Claim on 11 January 2005 on Mr. Prior. I also attach
as Exhibit "8" a copy of a 19 January 2005 e-mail from Mr. Amos.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "9" a copy of a 22 November 2004 letter
addressed to me from Edward Roberts, the Lieutenant Governor of
Newfoundland and Labrador covering a 2 September 2004 letter from Mr.
Amos addressed to John Crosbie, Edward Roberts, in his capacity as
Lieutenant Governor, Danny Williams, in his capacity as Premier of
Newfoundland and Labrador, and Brian F. Furey, President of the Law
Society of Newfoundland and Labrador. I requested a copy of this
letter from Government House after asking Mr. Roberts if he had
received any correspondence from Mr. Amos during his previous
representation of Mr. Matthews. He advised me that he received a
letter since becoming Lieutenant Governor, portions of which involved
his representation of Mr. Matthews. Mr. Roberts' letter also covered
his reply to Mr. Amos.

THAT I attach as Exhibit "10" an e-mail from Mr. Amos received on
Sunday, 23 January 2005.

THAT I swear this Affidavit in support of the Application to strike
Mr. Prior's counterclaim.

SWORN to before me at
St. John's, Province of Newfoundland and Labrador this 24th day of
January, 2005.

Signed by Della Hart
STEPHEN J. MAY
Signature STAMP
DELLA HART
A Commissioner for Oaths in and for
the Province of Newfoundland and Labrador. My commission expires on
December 31, 2009



---- Original Message -----
From: "McKnight, Gisele"McKnight.Gisele@kingscorecord.com
To: lcampenella@ledger.com
Cc:motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: David Amos

Hello Lisa,

David Amos asked me to contact you. I met him last June after he became
an independent (not representing any political party) candidate in our
federal
election that was held June 28. He was a candidate in our constituency of
Fundy (now called  Fundy-Royal).

I wrote a profile story about him, as I did all other candidates. That
story appeared in the Kings County Record June 22. A second story, written
by one of my reporters, appeared on the same date, which was a report on
the candidates' debate held June 18.

As I recall David Amos came last of four candidates in the election.
The winner got 14,997 votes, while Amos got 358.

I have attached the two stories that appeared, as well as a photo
taken by reporter Erin Hatfield during the debate. I couldn't find the photo
that ran, but this one is very similar.


A1-debate A1-amos,David for MP 24.doc debate 2.JPG

Gisele McKnight editor
Kings County Record
Sussex, New Brunswick
Canada
506-433-1070


Raising a Little Hell- Lively Debate Provokes Crowd

By Erin Hatfield

"If you don't like what you got, why don't you change it? If your
world is all screwed up, rearrange it."

The 1979 Trooper song Raise a Little Hell blared on the speakers at
the 8th Hussars Sports Center Friday evening as people filed in to
watch the Fundy candidates debate the issues. It was an accurate, if
unofficial, theme song for the debate.

The crowd of over 200 spectators was dwarfed by the huge arena, but as
they chose their seats, it was clear the battle lines were drawn.
Supporters of Conservative candidate Rob Moore naturally took the blue
chairs on the right of the rink floor while John Herron's Liberalswent
left. There were splashes of orange, supporters of NDP Pat Hanratty,
mixed throughout. Perhaps the loudest applause came from a row towards
the back, where supporters of independent candidate David Amos sat.

The debate was moderated by Leo Melanson of CJCW Radio and was
organized by the Sussex Valley Jaycees. Candidates wereasked a barrage
of questions bypanelists Gisele McKnight of the Kings County Record
and Lisa Spencer of CJCW.

Staying true to party platforms for the most part, candidates
responded to questions about the gun registry, same sex marriage, the
exodus of young people from the Maritimes and regulated gas prices.
Herron and Moore were clear competitors,constantly challenging each
other on their answers and criticizing eachothers' party leaders.
Hanratty flew under the radar, giving short, concise responses to the
questions while Amos provided some food for thought and a bit of comic
relief with quirky answers. "I was raised with a gun," Amos said in
response to the question of thenational gun registry. "Nobody's
getting mine and I'm not paying 10 cents for it."

Herron, a Progressive Conservative MP turned Liberal, veered from his
party'splatform with regard to gun control. "It was ill advised but
well intentioned," Herron said. "No matter what side of the house I am
on, I'm voting against it." Pat Hanratty agreed there were better
places for the gun registry dollars to be spent.Recreational hunters
shouldn't have been penalized by this gun registry," he said.

The gun registry issues provoked the tempers of Herron and Moore. At
one point Herron got out of his seat and threw a piece of paper in
front of Moore. "Read that," Herron said to Moore, referring to the
voting record of Conservative Party leader Steven Harper. According to
Herron, Harper voted in favour of the registry on the first and second
readings of the bill in 1995. "He voted against it when it counted, at
final count," Moore said. "We needa government with courage to
register sex offenders rather than register the property of law
abiding citizens."

The crowd was vocal throughout the evening, with white haired men and
women heckling from the Conservative side. "Shut up John," one woman
yelled. "How can you talk about selling out?" a man yelled whenHerron
spoke about his fear that the Conservatives are selling farmers out.

Although the Liberal side was less vocal, Kings East MLA Leroy
Armstrong weighed in at one point. "You're out of touch," Armstrong
yelled to Moore from the crowd when the debate turned to the cost of
post-secondary education. Later in the evening Amos challenged
Armstrong to a public debate of their own. "Talk is cheap. Any time,
anyplace," Armstrong responded.

As the crowd made its way out of the building following the debate,
candidates worked the room. They shook hands with well-wishers and
fielded questions from spectators-all part of the decision-making
process for the June 28 vote.

Cutline - David Amos, independent candidate in Fundy, with some of his
favourite possessions--motorcycles.

McKnight/KCR

The Unconventional Candidate

David Amos Isn't Campaigning For Your Vote, But....

By Gisele McKnight

FUNDY--He has a pack of cigarettes in his shirt pocket, a chain on his
wallet, a beard at least a foot long, 60 motorcycles and a cell phone
that rings to the tune of "Yankee Doodle."

Meet the latest addition to the Fundy ballot--David Amos.

The independent candidate lives in Milton, Massachusetts with his wife
and two children, but his place of residence does not stop him from
running for office in Canada.

One has only to be at least 18, a Canadian citizen and not be in jail
to meet Elections Canada requirements.

When it came time to launch his political crusade, Amos chose his
favourite place to do so--Fundy.

Amos, 52, is running for political office because of his
dissatisfaction with politicians.

"I've become aware of much corruption involving our two countries," he
said. "The only way to fix corruption is in the political forum."

The journey that eventually led Amos to politics began in Sussex in
1987. He woke up one morning disillusioned with life and decided he
needed to change his life.

"I lost my faith in mankind," he said. "People go through that
sometimes in midlife."

So Amos, who'd lived in Sussex since 1973, closed his Four Corners
motorcycle shop, paid his bills and hit the road with Annie, his 1952
Panhead motorcycle.

"Annie and I rode around for awhile (three years, to be exact)
experiencing the milk of human kindness," he said. "This is how you
renew your faith in mankind - you help anyone you can, you never ask
for anything, but you take what they offer."

For those three years, they offered food, a place to sleep, odd jobs
and conversation all over North America.

Since he and Annie stopped wandering, he has married, fathered a son
and a daughter and become a house-husband - Mr. Mom, as he calls
himself.

He also describes himself in far more colourful terms--a motorcyclist
rather than a biker, a "fun-loving, free-thinking, pig-headed
individual," a "pissed-off Maritimer" rather than an activist, a proud
Canadian and a "wild colonial boy."

Ironically, the man who is running for office has never voted in his life.

"But I have no right to criticize unless I offer my name," he said.
"It's alright to bitch in the kitchen, but can you walk the walk?"

Amos has no intention of actively campaigning.

"I didn't appreciate it when they (politicians) pounded on my door
interrupting my dinner," he said. "If people are interested, they can
call me. I'm not going to drive my opinions down their throats."

And he has no campaign budget, nor does he want one.

"I won't take any donations," he said. "Just try to give me some. It's
not about money. It goes against what I'm fighting about."

What he's fighting for is the discussion of issues - tainted blood,
the exploitation of the Maritimes' gas and oil reserves and NAFTA, to
name a few.

"The political issues in the Maritimes involve the three Fs - fishing,
farming and forestry, but they forget foreign issues," he said. "I'm
death on NAFTA, the back room deals and free trade. I say chuck it
(NAFTA) out the window.

NAFTA is the North American Free Trade Agreement which allows an
easier flow of goods between Canada, the United States and Mexico.

Amos disagrees with the idea that a vote for him is a wasted vote.

"There are no wasted votes," he said. "I want people like me,
especially young people, to pay attention and exercise their right.
Don't necessarily vote for me, but vote."

Although...if you're going to vote anyway, Amos would be happy to have
your X by his name.

"I want people to go into that voting booth, see my name, laugh and
say, 'what the hell.'"


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:01:00 -0300
Subject: RE John Conway of the University of Regina and his published
opinion of the demise of the NDP In SK
To: John.Conway@uregina.ca, voices@operationmaple.com, bwall
<bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>,
bboyd@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, pr@potashcorp.com,
Podwika@potashcorp.com, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
corporate.relations@potashcorp.com
Cc: dwain@saskndp.ca, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com, jane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com,
"jacques.nasser"<jacques.nasser@bhpbilliton.com>, occupyfredericton
<occupyfredericton@gmail.com>, "9.17occupywallstreet"
<9.17occupywallstreet@gmail.com>, occupyottawa
<occupyottawa@gmail.com>

http://www.operationmaple.com/home/173-saskatchewan-ndp-faces-electoral-disaster

http://www.arts.uregina.ca/john-conway

I don't believe John Conway knows as much as he thinks he does so he
deserved to be somewhat more enlightened EH Brad Wall? Rest assured
that I called him and told him as much as he wanted to know while
Lingenfelter's campain manager played as dumb as a post about my
concerns.

However as dumb as Lingenfelter and his cohorts may pretend to be if
the NDP boss in SK truly practiced old style, right wing "take no
prisoners" politicking he who have embarassed the hell out of Brad
Wall last year with the letter from Jac Nasser to mean old me that is
hereto attached.

Anyone with two clues between their ears or even a dumb NDP dude would
know that BHP Billiton's Marius Kloppers visiting Brad Wall during an
election campaign is just no coincidence at all. Something smells
truly rotten indeed. However the only way to resolve my concerns is
byway of litigation CORRECT MR WALL?

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/business/breakingnews/bhp-billiton-ceo-meets-with-saskatchewan-premier-during-election-campaign-131894618.html

Have your lawyers review the emials below and tell your Attorney
General to find the documents I sent his office byway REGISTERED US
MAIL in 2005 and tell them to give me a call if they have more BALLS
than you EH MR WALL?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:16:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Fw: RE BHP's game I just called Bill Boyd and the NDP In SK
they played dumb as usual
To: bwall@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, dlingenfelter@mla.legassembly.sk.ca,
bboyd@mla.legassembly.sk.ca, pr@potashcorp.com,
Podwika@potashcorp.com, fosterd@bennettjones.ca,
corporate.relations@potashcorp.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com


From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Yo Shawny Baby interestng trick your pal Carl Urquhart and
his buddies in the RCMP and Fat Fred City's Finest tried to pull on my
son and I last night EH?
To: "MLA"<MLA@carlurquhart.com>, "kelly. lamrock"
<kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, "jack. keir"<jack.keir@gnb.ca>,
"jack.macdougall"<jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca>, "Ed. Doherty"
<Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca>, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"<wally.stiles@gnb.ca>,
"oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "danfour"
<danfour@myginch.com>, "Richard Harris"
<injusticecoalition@hotmail.com>, "tracy"<tracy@jatam.org>, "nb.
premier"<nb.premier@gmail.com>, "nbpolitico"<nbpolitico@gmail.com>,
"terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>
Cc: "Wayne.Lang"<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "rob.lafrance"
<rob.lafrance@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "shawn. graham"<shawn.graham@gnb.ca>,
"John. Foran"<John.Foran@gnb.ca>, "john"
<john@johncampbellsaintjohnharbour.ca>, "krisaustin"
<krisaustin@panb.org>, "robin reid"<zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>, "tony"
<tony@peoplestandup.ca>, fortsaskatchewan.vegreville@assembly.ab.ca,
"Barry.MacKnight"<Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>, "Barry Winters"
<sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 6:25 PM

How dumb was that? I must ask did he expect the cops to arrest both of
us and then call us both crazy? Hell Urquhart even bragged in front of
the cops that he did the same shit on July 4th, 2008 That malicious
nonsense didn't work out too well for the long gone lawyer and former
Minister of Health Mikey Murphy partcularly after the nasty French
bastard Chucky Lebanc and hs pals violated my privacy and blogged
about N'esy Pas? I told the cops last nght to simply Google my name and
the dumb bastards laughed.

FYI type in Davd Amos to see that I wa not jokng with the smiling dumb
bastards last nght Google will offer Chucky Leblanc's bullshit about
mean old me at the top of the hit  list DUHHH?

Davd Amos plus Google equals

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/07/feds-institutionalize-determined-nb.html

Do tell does Carl Baby really think I won't sue his nasty arse
someday? Ya think the corrupt ex cop of Fat Fred City's Finest would
at least wait until he and his cohorts got sworn in to take over your
jobs EH?

--- On Mon, 9/13/10, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote:


From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: How is your conscience and sense of ethical conduct doing now
ladies?
To: Jane.McAloon@bhpbilliton.com, Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com
Cc: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"<william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Dean.Buzza"<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Date: Monday, September 13, 2010, 7:57 PM


Jane McAloon (Group Company Secretary) BEc (Hons), LLB, GDipGov, FCIS
Term of office: Jane McAloon was appointed Group Company Secretary in
July 2007 and joined the BHP Billiton Group in September 2006 as
Company Secretary for BHP Billiton Limited.
Skills and experience: Prior to joining BHP Billiton, Jane McAloon
held the position of Company Secretary and Group Manager External and
Regulatory Services in the Australian Gas Light Company. She
previously held various State and Commonwealth government positions,
including Director General of the NSW Ministry of Energy and Utilities
and Deputy Director General for the NSW Cabinet Office, as well as
working in private legal practice. She is a Fellow of the Institute of
Chartered Secretaries.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Collins, Susan J (COSEC)"<Susan.J.Collins@bhpbilliton.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:23:12 +1000
Subject: Email to BHP Billiton Chairman's
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com


Please find attached a letter from Mr Jac Nasser, Chairman of BHP
Billiton

Susan Collins
Company Secretariat
BHP Billiton | 180 Lonsdale St | Melbourne Vic 3000 |Australia
T: +61 3 9609 2654 | M: +61 427 713 994 | F: +61 3 9609 3290
E: susan.j.collins@bhpbilliton.comjane.mcaloon@bhpbilliton.com
>

<>


-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp.com;
lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com; nmiller@corridor.ca;
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com;
rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
you people buy much stock in their stock eh?

With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
issues again about  theexploitation of our natural resources to a
bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
now)

Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spiling the beans
sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos


This message and any attached files may contain information that is
confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
sender immediately and delete the message.



http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=821

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/potash-corp-soars-bhp-bid-rejected/article1675353/

http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00828/BHPrelease_828561a.pdf

http://www.potashcorp.com/media/POT_2010_Letter_from_BHP_Billiton's_Chairman.pdf

http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/aboutUs/companyOverview/ourBoard.jsp

http://www.potashcorp.com/about/management_board/senior_management/podwika/

http://www.corridor.ca/media/2010-press-releases/20100510.html

http://www.bennettjones.com/people_item.aspx?person=712&name=foster&pg=&office=

http://www.robmooremp.com/081908.htm

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new-brunswick/story/2009/05/07/nb-penobsquis-water-lawyer-1056.html?ref=rss

http://www.newbrunswickbeacon.ca/2010/03/risk-and-reward-when-rural-life-meets-economic-development/5666

http://www.vancouverislandwaterwatchcoalition.ca/go456a/FRACKING

http://www.elements.nb.ca/theme/ecojustice/JeanPaul/JeanPaul.htm

http://www.nbmediacoop.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1133:penobsquis-residents-seek-compensation-for-damages&catid=82:environment&Itemid=197



From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Yo Mr Harper What part of this email did the many Green
Meanies fail to understand last year?
To: "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "davidc.coon"<davidc.coon@gmail.com>,
leader@greenparty.ca, "campaign"<campaign@briantopp.ca>,
"Nycole.Turmel"<Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"
<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net>, "briangallant10"
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "gregory.graham"
<gregory.graham@tidescanada.org>, "ross"<ross@tidescanada.org>,
"ross.mcmillan"<ross.mcmillan@tidescanada.org>,
info@blackriver.ns.ca, "maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
darce@nsrighttoknow.ca, timb@thecoast.ca, "counsel"
<counsel@barackobama.com>, "newt"<newt@newt.org>, "info"
<info@mittromney.com>
Cc: jb@sierraclub.ca, "premier@gov.ns.ca"<premier@gov.ns.ca>,
"premier.ministre"<premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.ca>,
"OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX"<premier@gov.bc.ca>, "premier"
<premier@gnb.ca>
Date: Friday, January 27, 2012, 8:46 AM


You and lawyers such as Joey Oliver, Gary Lunn and Dizzy Lizzy May are
well aware of why I have "Issues" with the Greasy Gassy Oily Guys, the
National Energy Board and all the Green Meanies EH?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 15:26:17 -0300
Subject: I just called
To: timb@thecoast.ca
Cc: info@greenbelt.ca, taxworthy@gordonfn.org, tim@gordonfn.org,
tbrodhead@mcconnellfoundation.ca

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Lisa Gue <lgue@davidsuzuki.org>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:37:02 -0400
Subject: RE: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me
back Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cc: Jean-Patrick Toussaint <jptoussaint@davidsuzuki.org>, Sutton Eaves
<seaves@davidsuzuki.org>, Ian Bruce <ibruce@davidsuzuki.org>

Mr. Amos,

When you called my cell phone earlier, as I was on my way into a
meeting, you offered to send me an e-mail outline the information you
are looking for from the David Suzuki Foundation. Is this it??

Lisa Gue

From: Sutton Eaves <seaves@davidsuzuki.org>
Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: The greedy pople on the Fake Left
say nasty things about mean old me as well EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: "David Amos"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:55 PM


Thanks for your message. I am out of the office until Tuesday, April 19.

If this is a media request, please contact Ian Hanington at
ihanington@davidsuzuki.org, or Leanne Clare at lclare@davidsuzuki.org.

Otherwise, I'll return your message when I return.

Have a great day!


From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Subject: The greedy pople on the Fake Left say nasty things about mean
old me as well EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy@jatam.org,
dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca,
nmiller@corridor.ca, coalitionstlaurent@me.com,
jeanpatrick.toussaint@adelaide.edu.au, info@climateprojectcanada.org,
lgue@davidsuzuki.org, ibruce@davidsuzuki.org, seaves@davidsuzuki.org,
"pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>, "IgnatM"<IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>, "danfour"
<danfour@myginch.com>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, "charlieparkermla"
<charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca>, "ducepg"<ducepg@parl.gc.ca>,
"LaytoJ"<LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, leader@greenparty.ca
Cc: "pm"<pm@pm.gc.ca>, ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca
Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:54 PM


From: John Bennett <jb@sierraclub.ca>
Subject: Re: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me
back Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
To: "Paula Boutis"<pboutis@ilercampbell.com>,
"JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com"<JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com>, "Wayne
Gallant"<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "webo@xplornet.com"
<webo@xplornet.com>, "Gretchen Fitzgerald"<gretchenf@sierraclub.ca>,
"maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Cc: "pfalvo@yellowknife.ca"<pfalvo@yellowknife.ca>
Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:26 PM


He is known to Gretchen as not quiet rational.

John Bennett Executive Director Sierra Club Canada 613 291 6888

-----Original Message-----
From: "Paula  Boutis"<pboutis@ilercampbell.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 10:18:46
To: JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com<JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com>; Wayne
Gallant<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
webo@xplornet.com<webo@xplornet.com>;
jb@sierraclub.ca<jb@sierraclub.ca>;
gretchenf@sierraclub.ca<gretchenf@sierraclub.ca>;
maritime_malaise<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Cc: pfalvo@yellowknife.ca<pfalvo@yellowknife.ca>
Subject: RE: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me back
Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?

I am not responding to Dave Amos' emails, but I believe I have heard
he has some "issues".  I have no sense of what his involvement is with
the organization or why he is threatening law suits (my receptionist
just intercepted a call and he told her he didn't want to leave a
message and to just tell her that he would "see me in court").

Does anyone have any idea what to do about this guy?   Should we just
ignore him?

Paula

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:01:31 -0300
Subject: i just called some of you again. Instead of calling me back
Suzuki's people just surf the net and play dumb Correct?
To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy@jatam.org,
dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca,
nmiller@corridor.ca, coalitionstlaurent@me.com,
jeanpatrick.toussaint@adelaide.edu.au, info@climateprojectcanada.org,
lgue@davidsuzuki.org, ibruce@davidsuzuki.org, seaves@davidsuzuki.org,
pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, IgnatM <IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>,
"oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, "bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"
<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>, charlieparkermla
<charlieparkermla@ns.aliantzinc.ca>, ducepg <ducepg@parl.gc.ca>,
LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, leader@greenparty.ca

http://www.coalitionsaintlaurent.ca/en/contact

Jean-Patrick Toussaint
Spokesperson (english), St-Lawrence Coalition
(David Suzuki Foundation)
514-316-4646

http://www.davidsuzuki.org/fr/

http://www.climateprojectcanada.org/.profile/jtoussaint3

http://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/jeanpatrick.toussaint

http://www.climateprojectcanada.org/about/board

Did that lots of people have an opinion of bugets not just David
Suzuki and the greasy gassy oily guys such as Emera, Corridor
Resources and irving Oil

http://www.davidsuzuki.org/media/

Just Dave
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 13,581
Domain Name   videotron.ca ? (Canada)
IP Address   69.70.160.# (Videotron Ltee)
ISP   Videotron Ltee
Location   Continent  :  North America
Country  :  Canada  (Facts)
State/Region  :  Quebec
City  :  Boucherville
Lat/Long  :  45.6, -73.45 (Map)
Language   English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System   Microsoft WinXP
Browser   Firefox
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8)
Gecko/20100722 Firefox/3.6.8 ( .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET4.0C)
Javascript   version 1.5
Monitor   Resolution  :  1680 x 1050
Color Depth  :  24 bits
Time of Visit   Apr 6 2011 2:01:04 pm
Last Page View   Apr 6 2011 2:01:04 pm
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL  http://www.google.ca...0yufbeXCuJf0WH_kccBw
Search Engine  google.ca
Search Words  david amos corridor resources
Visit Entry Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Visit Exit Page   http://davidamos.blogspot.com/
Out Click
Time Zone   UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time   Apr 6 2011 1:01:04 pm
Visit Number   13,581



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:04:12 -0300
Subject: FYI here is a litte Deju Vu from Saint John Harbour for Dr Ed
to review EH Shawny Baby?
To: john <john@johncampbellsaintjohnharbour.ca>,
"carlkillen@gmail.com"<carlkillen@gmail.com>, "Ed. Doherty"
<Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca>, sharon_christian@transcanada.com, Aaron Kennedy
<sjmpabk@nb.sympatico.ca>, alison.gayton@unb.ca,
Allison_denning@hc-sc.gc.ca, amcallis@nrcan.gc.ca,
mcnan@reg2.health.nb.ca, info@irishhouseoftara.com,
ohallowe@gov.ns.ca, caring@rogers.com, cstpierre@nbpower.com, "Charles
L. Debly"<charlesdebly56@yahoo.com>, dannyrobichaud@nb.aibn.com,
deg@nb.aibn.com, darrell@unbi.org, dawnc@nbnet.nb.ca,
ddavies@mccarthy.ca, "Dorothy C. Dawson"<lawbrodc@hotmail.com>,
erik.denis@gnb.ca, FollowFran@yahoo.ca, fjames@gmail.com,
wattadil@nbnet.nb.ca, gnemecr@repsolypf.com, macgriff@nbnet.nb.ca,
saurtwo@nb.sympatico.ca, ileadley@duke-energy.com,
horse97@nb.sympatico.ca, Jake.Harms@justice.gc.ca, jsmellie@osler.com,
pearcer@nbnet.nb.ca, joel_forrest@transcanada.com,
pappas.john@jdirving.com, smithl@bennettjones.ca,
len.hoyt@mcinnescooper.com, lratelle@gazmetro.com,
Brunswick.Pipeline@ec.gc.ca, mbrown@heritagegas.com,
mosher.mark@jdirving.com, matthew_wharton@transcanada.com,
burgess@nbnet.nb.ca, christiemike@rogers.com,
Muratte.Graves@irvingoil.com, murray99@nbnet.nb.ca,
gretenern@bennettjones.ca, nmiller@corridor.ns.ca,
longsure@nbnet.nb.ca, peggyjames@rogers.com, Paul.Vanderlaan@gnb.ca,
zedpl@parl.gc.ca, pthompson@blgcanada.com, Pcblaney@rogers.com,
rjpelletier@duke-energy.com, rene.gallant@nspower.ca,
richard.neufeld@fmc-law.com, Rinde.Powell@encana.com,
fairbairn@capp.ca, Robert.Gall@shell.com, robmoirndp@gmail.com,
ronald.moore@esso.ca, ron@unitedway.aibn.nb.com,
shelley.black@enbridge.com, mcgratst@gov.ns.ca,
sweilcox@nb.sympatico.ca, curriet@mar.dfo-mpo.gc.ca,
ted_semadeni@anadarko.com, tdalgleish@mccarthy.ca,
edterry@nbnet.nb.ca, tinkpen@gmail.com, William.Gould@gnb.ca
Cc: "kelly. lamrock"<kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca>, "shawn. graham"
<shawn.graham@gnb.ca>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
danfour <danfour@myginch.com>, robin reid <zorroboy2009@hotmail.com>,
"tomp. young"<tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com>, tony
<tony@peoplestandup.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:59:59 -0300
Subject: I called you all and tried to explain how I can help with
your concerns I repeat just say my name
To: action@ecologyaction.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca, tracy
<tracy@jatam.org>, dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca, mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca
Cc: nmiller <nmiller@corridor.ca>, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"
<wally.stiles@gnb.ca>

If nothing else listen to this and get pissed off lIke mean old me. At
least that emotion is honest.

http://www.archive.org/details/Corridor1

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos



http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/in-the-news

http://atlantic.sierraclub.ca/en/media/release/coalition-calls-leaders-act-immediately-stop-oil-and-gas-exploration-gulf-st-lawrence

COALITION CALLS ON LEADERS TO ACT IMMEDIATELY TO STOP OIL AND GAS
EXPLORATION IN GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE
For Immediate Release - October 4, 2010
PICTOU, NS - Today's decision by the Canada Newfoundland and Labrador
Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB) to allow seismic blasting in the
Gulf of St. Lawrence was met with shock and concern by a coalition
calling for a moratorium on oil and gas development in the Gulf of St.
Lawrence. The coalition - made of aboriginal, fishing, and
environmental organizations - is calling on municipal, provincial,
federal, and aboriginal leaders to act swiftly to halt the testing.

"With this decision, the CNLOPB has approved an activity that could
damage this entire precious ecosystem," according to Mary Gorman of
the Save Our Seas and Shores, "We want this decision reversed
immediately, and action taken to allow jurisdictions bordering on the
Gulf to have a say in its future."

"Seismic testing could start in the next 48 hours, potentially
damaging marine mammals like blue whales, and disrupting fish and
fisheries. This approval has given oil and gas as a toehold in the
Gulf that could lead to full scale drilling," according to Danielle
Giroux of the. "Fishermen I work for need more say over protecting the
Gulf. We want the CNLOPB's decision reversed immediately."

"An oil spill in the Gulf of St. Lawrence would impact fish stocks and
coastal communities in Quebec, PEI, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and
Newfoundland. Moreover, the national importance of this ecosystem must
be upheld."  says Gretchen Fitzgerald, of the Sierra Club Canada. "
Federal laws to protect endangered species and fish habitat recognize
the importance of protecting our shared biodiversity and resources.
This decision is not reflecting this shared responsibility or concerns
expressed by groups around the Gulf."

-30-



For more information, please contact:

Mary Gorman, Save our Seas and Shores, 902-926-2128/mjgorman@ns.sympatico.ca

Danielle Giroux (Francais), Attention Fragile (Magdalen Islands)
418-969-9440/dgiroux@tlb.sympatico.ca

Gretchen Fitzgerald, Director, Sierra Club Atlantic, 902-444-3113/
gretchenf@sierraclub.ca

Mark Butler, Policy Director, Ecology Action Centre,
902-429-5287/action@ecologyaction.ca

From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Subject: Say Hoka Hey to the very sneaky lawyer Dizzy Lizzy May for me will
ya?
To: JeanPaulBourque@gmail.com, "Wayne.Gallant"
<Wayne.Gallant@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, webo@xplornet.com,
board@sierraclub.ca, jb@sierraclub.ca, gretchenf@sierraclub.ca,
maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca
Cc: pfalvo@yellowknife.ca, pboutis@ilercampbell.com, leader@greenparty.ca
Received: Tuesday, April 12, 2011, 2:28 PM


http://www.sierraclub.ca/en/john-bennet-bio

Bennett was assisting Cape Bretoners opposing a coal-fired power plant
at Point Aconi in Nova Scotia when he first caught the attention
Elizabeth May, then Sierra Club Canada's executive-director. May liked
his approach - among other things, he'd brought his wife and two
daughters to a potluck supper meeting and assured the group he was
there to hear from them, not issue orders. Several years - and, after
an interview on a train ride from Toronto to Ottawa -- later, she
hired him as the Club's director of atmosphere and energy.

He managed environmental education campaigns; was the Club's main
spokesperson on air, energy, automotive and climate change issues;
prepared fundraising proposals; and wrote position papers and research
articles.

During this period, Bennett also headed the Climate Action Network, an
association of up to 100 environmental, health, labour and faith
organizations from 10 provinces and two territories. There, he was
also the chief spokesperson, wrote releases and papers, and acted as
liaison with government officials, ministers, MPs, their staffs and
industry leaders. He did similar work with a successor organization,
ClimateforChange.ca.

It was then that he was involved in preparing reporters for the
federal Conservative government's climate plan. "I figured we had to
talk to the media. We had to meet the government head-on, and say what
they were doing was going backward. We were very effective."

The work "succeeded to the extent that when Stéphane Dion became
Liberal leader, the party thought the climate and environment were
where they should campaign. They were right; they just did it very
badly."

A spirit of collaboration

Most recently, Bennett was communications director for the Green Party
of Canada, including the 2008 campaign in which the Greens, led by
May, won nearly a million votes and was the only party to increase its
total.

"It's a well-rounded background, ranging from activist events to
negotiating in the halls of power," Bennett says. "My knowledge covers
the spectrum of issues across the country."

Bennett's experience has demonstrated the importance of collaborating
with other groups and including as many people as possible, and their
ideas, in whatever work must be done. That was especially obvious in
the creation of the Green Budget Coalition, which analyzed federal
budgets in terms of their impact on environmental concerns.


----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: Fry.H@parl.gc.ca ; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ;
letters@proislam.com ; Cummins.J@parl.gc.ca ; Canada@cair-net.org ;
dcr618@msn.com ; madd_professor@cox.net ; Iolmisha@cs.com ;
derrickcrobinson@gmail.com ; khr909@hotmail.com ; erniemusic2@yahoo.com ;
kevin_annett@hotmail.com ; radical@radicalpress.com ; thespur@hotmail.com ;
lisah@whooshnet.com ; dougchristie@shaw.ca ; lawald@web.net ;
wickedwanda3@adelphia.net ; fbinhct@leo.gov ; info@afi-international.com ;
wgoss@smss.com ; landrews@smss.com ; jcrosbie@coxandpalmer.com ;
rgfaloon@coxandpalmer.com ; dhashey@coxandpalmer.com ; smay@coxandpalmer.com
; kmccullogh@smss.com ; gpetrie@smss.com ; orakwa@paulcomm.ca ;
Kahentinetha2@yahoo.com ; katenies20@yahoo.com ; media@cupw-sttp.org
Cc: ceri@shaw.ca ; deanr0032@hotmail.com ; info@politicswatch.com ;
Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca ; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca ; Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca ;
McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca ; Dhalla.R@parl.gc.ca ; Casey.B@parl.gc.ca ;
Leblanc.D@parl.gc.ca ; Holland.M@parl.gc.ca ; Hubbard.C@parl.gc.ca ;
Martin.Pat@parl.gc.ca ; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca ; Mark.I@parl.gc.ca ;
Turner.G@parl.gc.ca ; Chong.M@parl.gc.ca ; Comuzzi.J@parl.gc.ca ;
warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; John.Foran@gnb.ca
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 3:15 PM
Subject: RE;Budget votes and more War its the same old same old If you
forgot scroll down


I just talked to Paul Dewar's office for the last time.and spoke to Jamesey
Baby once again. He to me to go for it and sue the Crown I told him I willl
also sue him and his chickenshit boss too or my name ain't "Just Dave".
reveiw his Bullshit and start lining up lawyers.

"Katter, Robert (MP)"<Bob.Katter.MP@aph.gov.au> wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach
George W. Bush and put a stop Harper's motion tommorrow
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 02:18:35 +1000
From: "Katter, Robert \(MP\)"<Bob.Katter.MP@aph.gov.au>
To: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

Thank you for your e-mail which will be forwarded to the appropriate staff
member to deal with as soon as possible.
The Kennedy electorate is a large electorate (about 2.5 times the size of
the entire State of Victoria) with almost 150,000 residents, over 120
schools and over 140 localities all with various service and sporting clubs.
For this reason we receive quite a large volume of faxes, letters, e-mails
and phone calls each day and while our staff aim for a 7-day turnaround in
correspondence - unfortunately this is not always possible.  However, if you
have not heard back from anyone at the office within 7-14 days, please
telephone the office on the numbers listed below.
If the matter is urgent please phone 1800 810 519, or if you are not in the
electorate, 07 4061 6066.
To save disappointment we should advise that correspondence from outside the
electorate is not given the priority that correspondence within the
electorate is given.
That said, many thanks for your message, and we will endeavour to get back
to you as soon as possible.
Hon Bob Katter MP
Member for Kennedy
Innisfail Office:  Cnr Edith & Owen Sts PO Box 1638 Innisfail FNQ 4860 Ph 07
4061 6066 Fx 07 4061 6566
Mt Isa Office:  52 Miles St Mt Isa NWQ 4825 PO Box 2130 Mt Isa NWQ 4825 Ph
07 4743 3534 Fx 07 4743 0189
Parliament House (Sitting weeks only) Ph 02 6277 4978  Fx 02 6277 8558
Toll Free Number: 1800 810 519

"Roy, Bruno (Patterson Palmer NB)"<broy@pattersonpalmer.ca> wrote:

Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Stevey Boy Harper and Malicious Mikey
Ignatieff ain't fishing on Brokeback Mountian EH? Here is why
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 10:52:58 -0300
From: "Roy, Bruno \(Patterson Palmer NB\)"<broy@pattersonpalmer.ca>
To: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com

I will be out of the office until May 23rd. Should you need any assistance,
please call my assistant Doris at 856-9800.

Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 mai. Si vous avez des questions, vous
pouvez rejoindre mon adjointe Doris au 856-9800.



"Dewar, Paul - M.P."<Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca> wrote:
  Subject: RE: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach George W. Bush and put a
stop Harper's motion tommorrow
  Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 13:49:47 -0400
  From: "Dewar, Paul - M.P."<Dewar.P@parl.gc.ca>
  To: "David Amos"<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>


  Hi David. My name is James and I have been asked to send this message onto
you from Paul...

  Dear Mr. Amos,

  Thank you for informing me of your concerns regarding Canada's role in
Afghanistan after February 2007.

  The NDP voted against this motion because we believe it is the wrong
mission for Canada. It does not reflect the peace-making values that
Canadians want to see our forces undertake on the world stage. This forced
motion essentially ties our aid and development funds to war-making, and we
cannot support that.

  It is quite clear that Harper's Conservatives aren't interested in due
diligence. They're interested in dragging us further into a US-style combat
role and away from our traditional peace keeping role. Much like the
Liberals before them, the Conservatives have failed to tell Canadians:

  - What the chain of command and control will be for this mission.
  - What the definition of success will be for our troops.
  - What our exit strategy will be.

  Many Canadians have written me wanting answers and it is our duty as
representatives of our constituents, to get answers before committing to any
new missions overseas. As any soldier knows, time spent on reconnaissance is
never wasted.

  New Democrats recognize that Canada does have a role in assisting Afghanis
in rebuilding their country. Afghanistan is the largest recipient of
Canadian overseas development aid and we fully support the continuation of
that funding - outside of this mission.

  Thank you again for the time and effort you have taken to share your
thoughts with me, and for bringing your opinion on this matter to my
attention.

  Sincerely,



  Paul Dewar, MP Ottawa Centre



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com]
  Sent: May 16, 2006 8:13 PM
  To: Allen, Mike - M.P.; rcastrocalvo@yahoo.com; irislana@hotmail.com;
Angus, Charlie - M.P.; Atamanenko, Alex - M.P.; Bell, Catherine - M.P.;
Bevington, Dennis - M.P.; Black, Dawn - M.P.; Blaikie, Bill - M.P.;
Charlton, Chris - M.P.; Chow, Olivia - M.P.; Christopherson, David - M.P.;
Comartin, Joe - M.P.; Crowder, Jean - M.P.; Cullen, Nathan - M.P.; Davies,
Libby - M.P.; Dewar, Paul - M.P.; Julian, Peter - M.P.; Marston, Wayne -
M.P.; Martin, Pat D. - M.P.; Martin, Tony - M.P.; Masse, Brian - M.P.;
Mathyssen, Irene - M.P.; Nash, Peggy - M.P.; Priddy, Penny - M.P.; Savoie,
Denise - M.P.; Siksay, Bill - M.P.; Wasylycia-Leis, Judy - M.P.; Emerson,
David - M.P.
  Cc: Simms, Scott - M.P.; Russell, Todd - M.P.; Manning, Fabian - M.P.;
Hearn, Loyola - M.P.; Doyle, Norman - M.P.; Byrne, Gerry - M.P.; McGuire,
Joe - M.P.; MacAulay, Lawrence - M.P.; D'Amours, Jean-Claude - M.P.;
Hubbard, Charles - M.P.; Murphy, Brian - M.P.; Thibault, Robert - M.P.;
Savage, Michael - M.P.; Regan, Geoff - M.P.; Keddy, Gerald - M.P.; Eyking,
Mark - M.P.; Cuzner, Rodger - M.P.; Brison, Scott - M.P.
  Subject: Portions of wiretap tapes to impeach George W. Bush and put a
stop Harper's motion tommorrow


  Hey
          Before all the Parliamentarians argue and then vote to support
further Canadian deaths in one of George W. Bush's Wars for Global Control
for the benefit of his corporate cohorts perhaps, you should at least listen
to the attachments if you do not wish to bother to read what Billy Casey and
the Bankers got on May 12th. If I can assist in preventing the demise of
just one more Canadian warrior in a malicious foreign war, all of my work
will have been worth it EH?
           If everyone ignores me as usual, I will not be surprised. At
least I will sleep well with my conscience tonight because I know I have
done my very best to stop the nonsense since early 2002 long before the War
in Iraq began. None of you deserve to sleep well at all because you all
supported Harper's orders to send our people to war even before the 39th
Parliament sat this year. As far as I am concerned the blood of four very
honourable soldiers can be found on your hands. Shame on all of you for not
even bothering to honour our dead by lowering the flag on the Peacetower. As
long as I have been aware and could consider myself a Proad Canadian, I
thought we were peacekeepers rather than poorly paid hired guns for crooked
corporations, corrupt politicians and their wicked Yankee bible pounding
buddies.
                                                            Veritas Vincit
                                                                   David
Raymond Amos


  FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006

  Senator Arlen Specter
  United States Senate
  Committee on the Judiciary
  224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
  Washington, DC 20510

  Dear Mr. Specter:

  I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man named,
David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters raised in the
attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI
wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
previously.

  Very truly yours,
  Barry A. Bachrach
  Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
  Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
  Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com


        Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 00:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
        From: "David Amos"<motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com>
        Subject: Jumping Jimmy Flaherty's jump boots versus Crosbie's old
mukluks in a liberal Senate
        To: Grant.GARNEAU@gnb.ca, Russell_Feingold@feingold.senate.gov,
duffy@ctv.ca, tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com,
Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us, Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us,
Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us, Kandalaw@mindspring.com, kmdickson@comcast.net,
trvl@hotmail.com, patrick.fitzgerald@usdoj.gov, fbinhct@leo.gov,
oldmaison@yahoo.com, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, michael.malley@gnb.ca,
EGreenspan@144king.com, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca,
alicia.mcdonnell@state.ma.us, info@pco-bcp.gc.ca, ted.tax@justice.gc.ca,
Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca, racing.commission@state.ma.us, dwatch@web.net,
freeman.c@parl.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, graham.b@parl.gc.ca,
arthur.a@parl.gc.ca
        CC: nwnews@cknw.com, davidamos@bsn1.net, BBACHRACH@bowditch.com,
david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca,
moore.r@parl.gc.ca, thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, toews.v@parl.gc.ca,
day.s@parl.gc.ca, casey.b@parl.gc.ca, mlevine@goodmans.ca, brae@goodmans.ca,
steve.moate@utoronto.ca, sarah.mann@rci.rogers.com, rep@karenyarbrough.com,
dc@thepen.us, paul.neuman@asm.ca.gov, info@afterdowningstreet.org,
gearpigs@hotmail.com, alltrue@nl.rogers.com, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca

   Deja Vu Anyone? Anyone?
  That's what John Crosbie wore in 1979, the last time a budget brought down
a Canadian government in a minority-Parliament situation. It proved to be a
bad omen, given that the Conservative government of the day foundered on
Crosbie's document.
  The mukluks proved to be

4 attachmentsScan and download all attachments

Intervention.pdf
71K View as HTMLScan and download

Service_to_David_Raymond_Amos.pdf
58K View as HTMLScan and download

List_of_Parties_GH-1-2006.pdf
122K View as HTMLScan and download

Amos D 2010 09 14.pdf
41K View as HTMLScan and download

Attn Rt Hon Jeremy Corbyn MP I just called from 902 800 0369 and your assistant did not understand anything I told her Well I understand why Boris Johnson et al are blocking my emails to many folks

$
0
0
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
 
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 15:24:57 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Rt Hon Jeremy Corbyn MP Correct my number is 902 800 0369 I make 

human mistakes but at least I am a man of my words N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.




---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 15:24:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Rt Hon Jeremy Corbyn MP Correct my
number is 902 800 0369 I make human mistakes but at least I am a man
of my words N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?

To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Postmaster@bbc.co.uk
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 16:24:58 +0100
Subject: Undeliverable: Attn Rt Hon Jeremy Corbyn MP Correct my number
is 902 800 0369 I make human mistakes but at least I am a man of my
words N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
 
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
newsonline@bbc.co.uknewsonline@bbc.co.uk
>
The recipient won't be able to receive this message because it's too large.

The maximum message size that's allowed is 1 KB. This message is 7 KB.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 14:58:35 -0400
Subject: Attn Kaitlin Menza Trust that your article about Barbara Underwood.the New York 
Attorney General knowing Mr Mueller makes no brownie points with me
To: kaitlin.menza@gmail.com, kathryn@abovethelaw.com,
NYAG.Pressoffice@ag.ny.gov, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, 
 

Attorney General’s Press Office: (212) 416-8060

nyag.pressoffice@ag.ny.gov

https://www.cosmopolitan.com/politics/a20681352/barbara-underwood-ny-attorney-general/


Meet the Women Taking Over for Eric Schneiderman

They've toiled for years under disgraced politicos (not just
Schneiderman, but Eliot Spitzer and Anthony Weiner, too). In an
exclusive interview, the New York attorney general’s majority-female
staff talk about how they're finally taking charge under the state's
first female AG, Barbara Underwood.
By Kaitlin Menza        May 16, 2018

"Somebody once advised me in a different role: You’re in the job while
you’re in the job, and you're in the job until you're not," Underwood
says of guidance she received in 2001 from then-acting deputy attorney
general Robert Mueller, who of course has become a household name in
his own right since then."


"Before Schneiderman in the AG role, there was Andrew Cuomo, the child
of a political dynasty. Before Cuomo, it was Eliot Spitzer, who
eventually resigned as New York’s governor when he was caught in a
prostitution scandal in 2008.



Check page 2 of this old file of mine and Page 7 for Eliot Spitzer's signature


https://www.scribd.com/document/2619437/CROSS-BORDER



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 15:24:54 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Rt Hon Jeremy Corbyn MP Correct my
number is 902 800 0369 I make human mistakes but at least I am a man
of my words N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.



Meet the Women Taking Over for Eric Schneiderman

They've toiled for years under disgraced politicos (not just
Schneiderman, but Eliot Spitzer and Anthony Weiner, too). In an
exclusive interview, the New York attorney general’s majority-female
staff talk about how they're finally taking charge under the state's
first female AG, Barbara Underwood.
By Kaitlin Menza       
May 16, 2018

The highest ranking members of the New York attorney general’s office
are laughing, hugging, and taking selfies, gathered for a photo shoot
at Cosmopolitan.com's headquarters. They are jittery and tired after
the week they’ve had.

And what a week! At 6:47 p.m. on Monday, May 7, The New Yorker
published an investigation into their boss, Attorney General Eric
Schneiderman, an outspoken feminist and proud adversary of President
Donald Trump. In the story, four of his ex-girlfriends described
routine stranglings and slaps, in addition to other physical and
emotional abuses. At 7:21 p.m., Schneiderman released a statement
saying the violence was part of consensual role-playing between
himself and his sexual partners. At 9:45 p.m., he resigned.

The next day, Barbara Underwood was sworn in as his successor. She is
the first female attorney general of New York. It was an inauspicious
way to break a glass ceiling.

Barbara Underwood at Cosmopolitan.com HQ
Tory Rust     

"Everyone was stunned. I was stunned," Underwood says of the
Schneiderman scandal. She is wearing the same blue suit from her
historic swearing-in for today's photo shoot. "And now we're moving
forward."

Underwood is the most qualified person to ever hold the role, her team
tells me repeatedly. It's a phrase whose echo is bizarrely damning in
a post-Hillary Clinton world. Nevertheless, it's true: Underwood spent
the last decade serving as the state's solicitor general, and was
acting solicitor general of the United States under George W. Bush.
She argued 20 cases before the Supreme Court, and clerked under
Justice Thurgood Marshall. She was the first in her class at
Georgetown Law.
Lourdes Rosado and Margaret Garnett
Tory Rust     

Why did it take so long for a woman to take the helm, and in such a
liberal state as New York? "I think it’s because the process is
political," explains Janet Sabel, the chief deputy attorney general.
"It's not a process based on who is, in truth, the best attorney out
there in the community who can represent the interests of the state.
Women have a tougher time competing in that political process. It’s
telling that when we didn’t have a political process to decide who
could lead, Barbara was the obvious choice."

Before Schneiderman in the AG role, there was Andrew Cuomo, the child
of a political dynasty. Before Cuomo, it was Eliot Spitzer, who
eventually resigned as New York’s governor when he was caught in a
prostitution scandal in 2008.

Eric Schneiderman was an unabashed politician — many assumed he was
gunning for a presidential run in 2020. "Where Washington D.C. has
failed to lead on the issues that matter, Eric has made clear that New
York will provide a road map for the rest of the country," read his
biography on the attorney general website.

The 11 women gathered here represent the senior members of the
attorney general's office, which employs 1,800 people across the state
of New York. Schneiderman had assembled a team on which women held the
majority of leadership positions; it was just one of the aspects of
his prominent feminism. He repeatedly introduced a bill for free
contraception in New York, defended access to abortion clinics, and
published a brochure for victims of domestic violence.

He also, as The New Yorker pointed out, introduced a bill in 2010 to
make strangulation a felony, noting that the act is a popular move for
domestic abusers — a dazzling display of cognitive dissonance,
according to his exes.

But the work was good, even if the man wasn't. "For me, it was
reassuring when Barbara was announced as the acting AG — I knew that
people would continue to think of all of us in a positive light
because of the work we do and not because of this one blip," says
Lourdes Rosado, the leader of the state's civil rights bureau. "All of
a sudden it felt like, we know our course because she’s already our
leader and she has such gravitas in the legal community."

ReNika Moore

Still, that blip looms large in the room as staffers extol the
accomplishments of their new leader. Over the course of our interview,
all 11 women are careful to refer to Schneiderman obliquely as "the
previous leader" or to the scandal as "the events of the last few
days."

Press secretary Amy Spitalnick compares the Schneiderman scandal to
the election of Donald Trump in November 2016. "A brilliant colleague
said something to us on Tuesday: Our office has been through two
traumatic events in the last couple of years. The second was obviously
this week, but the first was the election," says Spitalnick, who also
worked on the mayoral campaign of Anthony Weiner. "Many of us came to
the office the morning after the election saying, 'Where do we go from
here?' And immediately we put our heads down and got to work." It was
the same, they say, last Tuesday.

"We focus on low-wage workers and we had workers coming in," says
ReNika Moore, the chief of the labor bureau. "Somehow they hadn't
heard about the events and they were like, 'I wasn’t paid. My family
won’t eat.' These are the issues they’re concerned about.”

Manisha Sheth, Leslie Dubeck, Amy Spitalnick
Tory Rust     

Schneiderman was also leading the fight against Donald Trump and many
of his policies. His office challenged the travel ban as soon as it
was announced, as well as the repeal of Deferred Action for Childhood
Arrivals (DACA).

"Trump has been Trump his entire life, and what is problematic is that
he is the president," Moore asserts. "He's using the powers of
government in ways that are abusive, that are discriminatory, that
don’t value all of the people who make us this country. I think for
us, as an office, it’s about recognizing when that’s happening, and
going after it."

Christina Harvey and Jeanette Moy
Tory Rust     

The women vow that this work will continue. Natalia Salgado, the
office's director of advocacy, has organized "resistance town halls"
across New York to address citizens' concerns about the Trump
administration. "Ultimately, what's beautiful about a movement is that
it’s never dependent on one person," she says.

If one elephant in this room is Eric Schneiderman, the other is the
fact that Underwood, their clearly beloved new leader, might only hold
this job for a couple of weeks. She is the acting attorney general,
and the New York state legislature is meeting with candidates this
week to see if they'd like to appoint someone else. That person will
then need to run for election in November 2018 — so it's possible that
four people will run the office over the course of a year.

The job of attorney general in one of the nation's most liberal states
under a controversial Republican president is, honestly, a sexy one.
It's a potentially showy role where a person could earn constant
headlines for taking on Trump policies and winning, as Schneiderman
did. Within the first days of his scandal, over a dozen New York
politicians and attorneys expressed interest in taking his post.

This leaves Underwood in the unfortunate position of having to battle
people for the job she was just hired to do. "I respect the role the
legislature has in this process, and I hope they will view it as an
opportunity to do what is best for the office," she says. "I think,
without any arrogance at all, it is fairly obvious that what is best
for the office is some continuity."

New York’s Governor Cuomo agrees, and has discouraged the legislature
and interested candidates from displacing Underwood. "She is
extraordinarily qualified. I think she provides capable leadership and
continuity in the office," he said last week.
Natalia Salgado

"Somebody once advised me in a different role: You’re in the job while
you’re in the job, and you're in the job until you're not," Underwood
says of guidance she received in 2001 from then-acting deputy attorney
general Robert Mueller, who of course has become a household name in
his own right since then.

"You just do it as well as you can for as long as you’re in the seat.
And that's my plan," she says.

She has a badass team of women with her while she does it. And she’s
careful about the context — when I ask the team how it feels to
finally work under a woman, Underwood visibly cringes.

"Could we say working 'with'?" she asks. "It really bothers me when we
talk about working 'under.'"

The room bursts out laughing.

Hearst Young Women's Network - A Part of Hearst Digital Media A Part
of Hearst Digital Media Cosmopolitan participates in various affiliate
marketing programs, which means we may get paid commissions on
editorially chosen products purchased through our links to retailer
sites.
©2018 Hearst Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

    Privacy Policy Your California Privacy Policy Terms of Use Site Map

 ---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 11:24:48 -0400
Subject: Attn Rt Hon Jeremy Corbyn MP Correct my number is 902 800 0369 I make
human mistakes but at least I am a man of my words N'esy Pas Bill Morneau?
To: leader@labour.org.uk, "chrystia.freeland"<chrystia.freeland@international.gc.ca>, "Chrystia.Freeland"<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca> ,
 "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, newsroom@globeandmail.com,
press <press@bankofengland.co.uk>, press <press@pirateparty.org.uk>,
 "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, 
 andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, 
 "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>

Thsi should be less than 1 k of info for the BBC to digest EH Boris Johnson?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/05/attn-rt-hon-jeremy-corbyn-mp-i-just.html

---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 13:32:51 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Rt Hon Jeremy Corbyn MP I just called from 902 900 0369 and your
assistant did not understand anything I told her Well I understand why Boris Johnson et al
are blocking my emails to many folks
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


There was a problem delivering your message to
chrystia.freeland@international.gc.ca. See the technical details
below, or try resending in a few minutes.
The response from the remote server was:

550 5.7.1 Error: Rejected

----------Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 09:10:26 -0400
Subject: Attn Rt Hon Jeremy Corbyn MP I just called from 902 900 0369 and your
assistant did not understand anything I told her Well I understand why Boris Johnson et al
are blocking my emails to many folks
To: leader@labour.org.uk, "chrystia.freeland"<chrystia.freeland@international.gc.ca>, "Chrystia.Freeland"<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>,
"Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>
Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>

Parliamentary
House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
Tel: 020 7219 3545
Email: leader@labour.org.uk

Small wonder why I publish my emails N'esy Pas Pas Bill Morneau???

Your message wasn't delivered to caroline.lucas.mp@parliament.uk
because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.

Your message wasn't delivered to boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk
because the address couldn't be found, or is unable to receive mail.


----------Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 13:17:20 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Jenny Jones I just called from 902 900 0369 I must say that your friend
Ken Livingstone picked an interesting time to quit EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


----------Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 13:13:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Jenny Jones I just called from 902 900 0369 I must say that
your friend Ken Livingstone picked an interesting time to quit EH?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.


----------Original message ----------
From: Postmaster@bbc.co.uk
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 14:12:17 +0100
Subject: Undeliverable: Attn Jenny Jones I just called from 902 900 0369 I must say
that your friend Ken Livingstone picked an interesting time to quit EH?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com

Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

newsonline@bbc.co.uk 

The recipient won't be able to receive this message because it's too large.

The maximum message size that's allowed is 1 KB. This message is 177 KB.


----------Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 08:43:51 -0400
Subject: Attn Jenny Jones I just called from 902 900 0369 I must say that your friend
Ken Livingstone picked an interesting time to quit EH?
To: media@jennyjones.org, jonesjb@parliament.uk,
contact@jennyjones.org, jeremy.corbyn.mp@parliament.uk,
mayt@parliament.uk, hammondp@parliament.uk, Johnsonb@parliament.uk,
theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk, philip.hammond.mp@parliament.uk,
public.enquiries@hmtreasury.gsi.gov.uk, jo.johnson.mp@parliament.uk,
newsonline@bbc.co.uk, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>,
"Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca
\"boris.johnson.mp\""<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>,
eastsussexlieutenancy@brighton-hove.gov.uk

https://www.greenparty.org.uk/people/jenny-jones.html


Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb

Jenny Jones

Jenny Jones, Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb joined the House of Lords
in 2013, having been chosen for this appointment in a ballot of all
Green Party members.

She was a Green Party member of the London Assembly from its creation
in 2000 until standing down in 2016. In 2003/04 she was appointed
Deputy Mayor for London by Ken Livingstone and worked closely with him
during his second term as Mayor when the greens successfully initiated
a series of environmental and social projects.

Jenny also served as chair of London Food (2005-08), having proposed
the setting up of the organisation. She has sought to improve the food
that is on offer to Londoners and to reduce its environmental impact.

Her most successful roles were as the Mayor’s Green Transport Adviser
(2004-2008) and Road Safety Ambassador (2001-2008), during which time
the number of people killed and seriously injured on London’s roads
decreased by over 2,000 with 20 mph zones and increased traffic
policing. A report she commissioned led to the creation of the hire
bike scheme and London’s cycling superhighways.

On the Assembly, she chaired the Economy Committee, the Housing
Committee and was Deputy Chair of the Policing and Crime Committee.
Her work, including several reports, has a strong emphasis on civil
liberties, sustainability and social justice.

She was the Green Party candidate for Mayor of London in 2012 and came third.

She sat on the Metropolitan Police Authority from 2000 to 2012 (when
it was abolished) where she held the Met and the Mayor to account,
particularly on civil liberties. She has consistently called for
greater police resources for the enforcement of road traffic laws, and
for better support for victims of crime.

She was also elected onto Southwark Council, from 2006 to 2010 and got
a motion approved for them to become a Living Wage employer.

In all her roles, Jenny has raised awareness of the dangers of climate
change and the urgent need to reduce greenhouse emissions. Jenny has
been a member of the project board that was leading the delivery of
the East London Green Grid of open spaces.

In 2004, Jenny was named as one of 200 'women of achievement'. Before
her election, Jenny Jones was an archaeologist working mainly in the
Middle East and a former chair of the Green Party Executive.

More about Green achievements on the London Assembly

Jenny Jones' official web site
Contact


For Parliamentary matters, contact jonesjb@parliament.uk or
contact@jennyjones.org

For media enquiries only please contact media@jennyjones.org or call
Ian Wingrove 07967 205330


For Parliamentary matters, contact jonesjb@parliament.uk or
contact@jennyjones.org

For media enquiries only please contact media@jennyjones.org or call
Ian Wingrove 07967 205330

http://kenlivingstone.net/2018/05/statement-from-ken-livingstone/


Statement from Ken Livingstone

“After much consideration, I have decided to resign from the Labour Party.

The ongoing issues around my suspension from the Labour Party have
become a distraction from the key political issue of our time – which
is to replace a Tory government overseeing falling living standards
and spiralling poverty, while starving our schools and the NHS of the
vital resources they need.

We live in dangerous times and there are many issues I wish to speak
up on and contribute my experience from running London to, from the
need for real action to tackle climate change, to opposing Trump’s
war-mongering, to the need to end austerity and invest in our future
here in Britain.

I do not accept the allegation that I have brought the Labour Party
into disrepute – nor that I am in any way guilty of anti-Semitism. I
abhor antisemitism, I have fought it all my life and will continue to
do so.

I also recognise that the way I made a historical argument has caused
offence and upset in the Jewish community. I am truly sorry for that.

Under Labour’s new General Secretary I am sure there will be rapid
action to expel anyone who genuinely has antisemitic views.

I am loyal to the Labour party and to Jeremy Corbyn. However any
further disciplinary action against me may drag on for months or even
years, distracting attention from Jeremy’s policies.

I am therefore, with great sadness, leaving the Labour Party.

We desperately need an end to Tory rule, and a Corbyn-led government
to transform Britain and end austerity. I will continue to work to
this end, and I thank all those who share this aim and who have
supported me in my own political career.”

* Ken Livingstone, May 21 2018.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Anita Bromberg <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 02:13:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Many years ago Robert S Mueller III and his
evil cohorts were in charge of Extraordinary Renditions and even tried
to pull that malice on me after I won some judgements in the USA
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Please note that Anita Bromberg is no longer employed at B'nai Brith
Canada. If this is a B'nai Brith matter, please redirect your email to
Amanda Hohmann at ahohmann@bnaibrith.ca.

Thank you.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "MAY, Theresa"<theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 02:13:36 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Many years ago Robert S Mueller III and his
evil cohorts were in charge of Extraordinary Renditions and even tried
to pull that malice on me after I won some judgements in the USA
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

If your email is to the Prime Minister, please re-send to the No 10
website: www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street<http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street>

If you are a constituent of the Prime Minister, please re-send to:
sharkeyj@parliament.uksharkeyj@parliament.uk>

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.



---------- Original message ----------
From: "JOHNSON, Boris"<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 02:13:34 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Many years ago Robert S Mueller III and his
evil cohorts were in charge of Extraordinary Renditions and even tried
to pull that malice on me after I won some judgements in the USA
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Rt. Hon. Boris Johnson MP
Member of Parliament for Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

Thank you for contacting Boris Johnson MP. Please note that this email
account is for constituency and other enquiries in my role as Member
of Parliament for Uxbridge and South Ruislip.

If you are a resident of Uxbridge and South Ruislip, please ensure
that you have included your full name and address. No emails will be
answered without full address and contact details.

Please note emails relating to the Foreign Office will not be replied
to. If you are contacting me about my responsibilities as Foreign
Secretary, you should re-send your email to:
fcocorrespondence@fco.gov.uk<mailto:fcocorrespondence@fco.gov.uk>

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Office, Press"<Press@bankofengland.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 02:14:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Many years ago Robert S Mueller III and his
evil cohorts were in charge of Extraordinary Renditions and even tried
to pull that malice on me after I won some judgements in the USA
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Press Office mailbox is monitored from 08:30-18:00, Monday to
Friday. Emails received outside of these hours will not be responded
to until the next working day.

If your message is urgent, please ring 020 7601 4411 and you will be
connected to the duty Press Officer.


Thanks



https://www.ft.com/content/98f75836-5d1c-11e8-9334-2218e7146b04

        Ex-London mayor Ken Livingstone quits Labour party
Leftwing veteran and former Corbyn ally was suspended in 2016 after
comments on Hitler
Ken Livingstone © Justin Tallis/AFP

Ken Livingstone has quit Labour, bringing to an end several years of
criticism over how the former mayor of London could stay in the party
after a string of controversies.

The leftwing veteran, once a close ally of leader Jeremy Corbyn, was
suspended in 2016 after making comments about Hitler being an early
advocate of Zionism.

He said on Monday that he was quitting the party after his lawyers
advised him that he could face months or years of wrangling if he lost
the case over his membership and was expelled.

“The ongoing issues around my suspension from the Labour party have
become a distraction from the key political issue of our time, which
is to replace a Tory government overseeing falling living standards
and spiralling poverty, while starving our schools and the NHS of the
vital resources they need,” he said.

Mr Corbyn said it was a “sad” moment but it was also “the right thing
to do”. The Labour leader has himself been battling wider allegations
of failing to crack down on anti-Semitic behaviour from some of his
followers in recent months.

His close ally Christine Shawcroft was forced to quit as Labour’s head
of discipline after intervening to support a leftwing council
candidate in Peterborough who had shared holocaust denial material on
Facebook.

Shami Chakrabarti, the shadow attorney-general, who wrote an internal
report into Labour anti-Semitism two years ago, last week called for
Mr Livingstone to be expelled.

Mr Livingstone first came to prominence when he ran the Greater London
Council between 1981 and 1986 from City Hall, just across the Thames
from the Thatcher government. He earned the nickname “Red Ken” as a
supporter of issues such as LGBT rights and Irish republicanism.

He has left Labour before: he was first elected as London mayor in
2000 as an independent, beating the party’s then candidate Frank
Dobson.

Having proved his electability, he was readmitted into the fold by
Tony Blair, the then leader, winning a second term in 2004 under the
Labour banner.

Despite his hard-left credentials, Mr Livingstone was widely seen as
an innovative and moderate mayor, bringing in the congestion charge,
part-pedestrianising Trafalgar Square and working closely with
property developers.

He stood unsuccessfully a third and fourth time for the mayoralty in
2008 and 2012, only to be beaten both times by Boris Johnson, the Tory
candidate.

Instead, he reinvented himself as a media pundit, with a regular slot
on LBC radio.
Recommended
Life & Arts
Momentum: inside Labour’s revolutionary movement

Despite his proximity to many in the Corbyn leadership, Mr Livingstone
landed himself in trouble in April 2016 with his comments that Hitler
“was supporting Zionism before he went mad and ended up killing 6m
Jews”.

With many Labour MPs calling for his suspension, including deputy
leader Tom Watson, and Mr Livingstone refusing repeatedly to
apologise, his membership of the party had become an embarrassment to
Mr Corbyn’s team.

A month ago, two Jewish groups held a rally in Parliament Square to
protest at what they saw as Mr Corbyn’s sluggish response to
allegations of anti-Semitism among some Labour members. At a more
recent meeting, they called on Mr Livingstone to be thrown out of the
party by the deadline of July.

In his statement, the former mayor apologised for making a “historical
argument” that had caused offence.

At the same time he was defiant to the end, saying that he did not
accept the allegation about bringing Labour into disrepute or being
guilty of anti-Semitism: “I abhor anti-Semitism, I have fought it all
my life and will continue to do so.”




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2018 08:17:14 -0400
Subject: ATTN Caroline Lucas I just called about Commissioner Katy
Bourne et al from 902 900 0369
To: brightonoffice@parliament.uk, caroline.lucas.mp@parliament.uk,
clucasmedia@parliament.uk, mayorsoffice@brighton-hove.gov.uk,
eastsussexlieutenancy@brighton-hove.gov.uk, Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "boris.johnson.mp"
<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>, "Gilles.Blinn"
<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

https://www.carolinelucas.com/get-in-touch


Caroline Lucas
Parliamentary
House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA
Tel: 020 7219 7025
Email: caroline.lucas.mp@parliament.uk

Constituency
Brighton Media Centre, 15-17 Middle Street, Brighton, BN1 1AA
Email: brightonoffice@parliament.uk




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: MayorsOffice <MayorsOffice@brighton-hove.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 22:29:28 +0000
Subject: Thank you
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your e-mail to
mayorsoffice@brighton-hove.gov.ukmayorsoffice@brighton-hove.gov.uk>.
We have received this and will respond within ten working days.

Notice to recipient:
The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended
only for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed
and may contain information which is privileged and confidential, the
disclosure of which is prohibited by law.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please
note that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error please notify the sender immediately.
Thank you in anticipation of your co-operation.

You can visit our website at http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk

Please consider the environment, only print out this email if
absolutely necessary.

Please Note:  Both incoming and outgoing Emails may be monitored
and/or recorded in line with current legislation


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: EastSussexLieutenancy <eastsussexlieutenancy@brighton-hove.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2018 14:46:19 +0000
Subject: FW: Ninesh Edwards I read your email after I had called
Councillor Bill Bentley and the office of the Lord Lieutenant of East
Sussex about my lawsuit against the Queen and my concerns about
Commissioner Katy Bourne                   protect
To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com"<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your message which has been passed to me to respond. We
are unable to assist you as this is a matter best referred to the
Foreign and Commonwealth Office.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "JOHNSON, Boris"<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:31:47 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: So Katty Bourne have got Johnny "Never Been
Good" Paterson locked up yet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Rt. Hon. Boris Johnson MP
Member of Parliament for Uxbridge and South Ruislip
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

Thank you for contacting Boris Johnson MP. Please note that this email
account is for constituency and other enquiries in my role as Member
of Parliament for Uxbridge and South Ruislip.

If you are a resident of Uxbridge and South Ruislip, please ensure
that you have included your full name and address. No emails will be
answered without full address and contact details.

Please note emails relating to the Foreign Office will not be replied
to. If you are contacting me about my responsibilities as Foreign
Secretary, you should re-send your email to:
fcocorrespondence@fco.gov.uk<mailto:fcocorrespondence@fco.gov.uk>

UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.



---------- Original message ----------
From: Katy Bourne <Katy.Bourne@sussex-pcc.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 10:31:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: So Katty Bourne have got Johnny "Never Been
Good" Paterson locked up yet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.

I aim to respond to your email as quickly as possible but do receive a
high volume of correspondence and calls.  Therefore, if your email is
urgent, please forward to my Executive Assistant:
gina.wheatley@sussex-pcc.gov.uk

Kind regards

Katy Bourne
Police & Crime Commissioner for Sussex


-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 May 2018 17:46
To: ninesh.edwards@westsussex.gov.uk; EastSussexLieutenancy; Geoff
Raw; Michaela Isaacs; MayorsOffice; Philip.Baker@eastsussex.gov.uk;
mervin.dadd@sussex-pcc.gov.uk; cllr.bill.bentley@eastsussex.gov.uk;
mark.streater@sussex-pcc.gov.uk; daniel.turk@sussex.pnn.police.uk
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos; motomaniac333
Subject: Ninesh Edwards I read your email after I had called
Councillor Bill Bentley and the office of the Lord Lieutenant of East
Sussex about my lawsuit against the Queen and my concerns about
Commissioner Katy Bourne

We just spoke below you will find some info about my first lawsuit
against the Queen

https://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk/content/council-and-democracy/councillors-and-committees/lord-lieutenant-east-sussex

The Lord Lieutenant of East Sussex
The Queen's representative

The Lord Lieutenant is appointed by The Queen to act on her behalf in
East Sussex. The title originated in the reign of Henry VIII and
originally had a military function. As there was no full-time army,
the Lord Lieutenant was charged with calling men of the county to arms
when needed. The role of Lord Lieutenant is now non-political and
unpaid.

Mr Peter Field became Lord Lieutenant for East Sussex in August 2008,
and holds this office until 2021.
Royal duties

The Lord Lieutenant's duties include:

    representing The Queen within East Sussex
    arranging royal visits to the county and escorting royal visitors
when appropriate
    participating in civic and social activities including direct and
indirect support to a wide range of groups, benevolent organisations,
industry and local businesses
    liaising with local armed forces units
    submitting honours nominations
    submitting royal garden party nominations
    presenting honours and awards on behalf of The Queen

Keeper of the Rolls (Custos Rotulorum)

As well as representing The Queen, the East Sussex Lord Lieutenant has
agreed to hold the post of Keeper of the Rolls for the Lord Chancellor
and Lord Chief Justice. This post dates back to the 15th century. The
rolls were the records of the Court of Quarter Sessions, an
administrative as well as judicial body.

http://www.east-sussex-lieutenancy.org.uk/contact-us/

Victoria Golding
PA to the Lieutenancy of East Sussex,
Civic Office, Brighton Town Hall
Bartholomew Square
Brighton
East Sussex,  BN1 1JA
email: eastsussexlieutenancy@brighton-hove.gov.uk
Telephone: 01273 293608

The Clerk to the Lieutenancy of East Sussex
Mr Geoff Raw, Chief Executive of Brighton & Hove City Council
Chief Executive’s Office
Brighton & Hove City Council
Hove Town Hall
Hove
BN3 3BQ

geoff.raw@brighton-hove.gov.uk
Tel: 01273 297329.

Michaela Isaacs
Civic Office Manager
email: michaela.isaacs@brighton-hove.gov.uk

The mayor's primary duty is to act as the Chair of Full Council
meetings. This means ensuring that the proceedings are conducted
properly and that all shades of opinion are given a hearing, as far as
possible.

The Civic Office also supports Queen's representative for East Sussex,
the Lord Lieutenant of East Sussex.

Councillor Mo Marsh is the current Mayor of Brighton & Hove

Brighton Town Hall
Bartholomew Square
Brighton
Postcode:
BN1 1JA

Email address: mayorsoffice@brighton-hove.gov.uk
Phone:  01273 291225
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/BHMayor
Twitter:
https://twitter.com/MayorOfficeBHCC

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:30:21 -0400
Subject: Fwd: I just called about Commissioner Katy Bourne from 902 900 0369
To: cllr.bill.bentley@eastsussex.gov.uk
Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, motomaniac333
<motomaniac333@gmail.com>

https://www.westsussex.gov.uk/about-the-council/how-the-council-works/committees-and-decision-making/other-meetings/sussex-police-and-crime-panel/#panel-members

Councillor Bill Bentley
Title: Lead Member for Communities and Safety
Party: Conservative
Swallow Brook House
15 Sandbanks Close
Hailsham
East Sussex
BN27 3TJ

Phone:  01323 847685
Mobile:  07710 717 131
Email:  cllr.bill.bentley@eastsussex.gov.uk

Panel members

In Sussex, the members of the Panel are drawn from each of the 15
local authorities within the region. At least 2 independent members
also sit on the Panel.

    Adur District Council – David Simmons
    Arun District Council – Mike Clayden
    Brighton and Hove City Council – Emma Daniel
    Brighton and Hove City Council – Joe Miller
    Chichester District Council – Eileen Lintill
    Crawley Borough Council – Michael Jones
    Eastbourne Borough Council – John Ungar
    East Sussex County Council – Bill Bentley (Chairman)
    East Sussex County Council – Carolyn Lambert
    Hastings Borough Council – Colin Fitzgerald
    Horsham District Council – Tricia Youtan
    Lewes District Council – Tony Nicholson
    Mid Sussex District Council – Norman Webster
    Rother District Council – Eleanor Kirby - Green
    Wealden District Council – Claire Dowling
    Worthing Borough Council – Valerie Turner
    West Sussex County Council - Christian Mitchell (Vice Chairman)
    Independent – Peter Nightingale*
    Independent – Susan Scholefield*

*Independent members of the Panel are required to sign up to West
Sussex County Council’s Code of Conduct.

---------- Original message ----------
From: Ninesh Edwards <ninesh.edwards@westsussex.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 14:44:04 +0000
Subject: I just called about Commissioner Katy Bourne from 902 900 0369
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hello Mr Amos,

Thank you for your voice message and for this email.

How can I help?


Best wishes,

Ninesh


Ninesh Edwards | Senior Advisor| Democratic Services West Sussex
County Council | Room 102 (Cabinet Office), County Hall, Chichester,
West Sussex.  PO19 1RQ
|Internal: 22542  | External: 0330 222 2542 | E-mail:
ninesh.edwards@westsussex.gov.uk | www.westsussex.gov.uk
What we do enables you


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 10:19:51 -0400
Subject: I just called about Commissioner Katy Bourne from 902 900 0369
To: pcp@westsussex.gov.uk, Katy.Bourne@sussex-pcc.gov.uk, pol4982
<pol4982@calgarypolice.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "bill.pentney"
<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

Contact Ninesh Edwards, Senior Advisor, Democratic Services, for
further information:

    Email pcp@westsussex.gov.uk
    Tel: 033 022 22542
    Address
    Room 21
    County Hall
    Chichester
    West Sussex
    PO19 1RQ

http://david1912.rssing.com/chan-22920969/all_p14.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Katy Bourne <Katy.Bourne@sussex-pcc.gov.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 04:53:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Chief Rick Hanson how could your corrupt
cops be even dumber than the RCMP or the mindless cops I talked to in
Halifax and in the UK today?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your email.

I will respond to your message as soon as possible.  However, I do
receive a significant number of emails, letters and telephone calls
each day and my scheduled commitments keep me very busy.

If you require a swift response please contact my office who will be
happy to assist.  Email: spcc@sussex-pcc.gov.uk or telephone : 01273
481561

Thank you once again for contacting me.

Kind regards

Katy Bourne
Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner
W: www.sussex-pcc.gov.uk
T: 01273 481561
T: @Sussexpcc  @KatyBourne

Kind regards

Katy Bourne
Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner
W: www.sussex-pcc.gov.uk
T: 01273 481561
T: @Sussexpcc @KatyBourne




This is the text of the lawsuit following that is more info

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html

Friday, 18 September 2015
David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15



                      Court File No. T-1557-15

FEDERAL COURT

BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS

                           Plaintiff
and

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN

                           Defendant

STATEMENT OF CLAIM

The Parties

1.      HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN (Crown) is Elizabeth II, the Queen of
England, the Protector of the Faith of the Church of England, the
longest reigning monarch of the United Kingdom and one of the
wealthiest persons in the world. Canada pays homage to the Queen
because she remained the Head of State and the Chief Executive Officer
of Canada after the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11 came into force
on April 17, 1982. The standing of the Queen in Canada was explained
within the 2002 Annual Report FORM 18-K filed by Canada with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It states as
follows:

     “The executive power of the federal Government is vested in the
Queen, represented by the Governor General, whose powers are exercised
on the advice of the federal Cabinet, which is responsible to the
House of Commons. The legislative branch at the federal level,
Parliament, consists of the Crown, the Senate and the House of
Commons.”

     “The executive power in each province is vested in the Lieutenant
Governor, appointed by the Governor General on the advice of the
federal Cabinet. The Lieutenant Governor’s powers are exercised on the
advice of the provincial cabinet, which is responsible to the
legislative assembly. Each provincial legislature is composed of a
Lieutenant Governor and a legislative assembly made up of members
elected for a period of five years.”

2.      Her Majesty the Queen is the named defendant pursuant to
sections 23(1) and 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act. Some
of the state actors whose duties and actions are at issue in this
action are the Prime Minister, Premiers, Governor General, Lieutenant
Governors, members of the Canadian Forces (CF), and Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP), federal and provincial Ministers of Public
Safety, Ministers of Justice, Ministers of Finance, Speakers, Clerks,
Sergeants-at-Arms and any other person acting as Aide-de-Camp
providing security within and around the House of Commons, the
legislative assemblies or acting as security for other federal,
provincial and municipal properties.

3.      Her Majesty the Queen’s servants the RCMP whose mandate is to
serve and protect Canadian citizens and assist in the security of
parliamentary properties and the protection of public officials should
not deny a correspondence from a former Deputy Prime Minister who was
appointed to be Canada’s first Minister of Public Safety in order to
oversee the RCMP and their cohorts. The letter that helped to raise
the ire of a fellow Canadian citizen who had never voted in his life
to run for public office four times thus far is quoted as follows:

  “Mr. David R. Amos
            Jan 3rd, 2004
153Alvin Avenue
   Milton, MA U.S.A. 02186

                Dear Mr. Amos

      Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to
                my predecessor, the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding
your safety.
                I apologize for the delay in responding.

      If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
               suggest that you contact the police of local
jurisdiction. In addition, any
               evidence of criminal activity should be brought to
their attention since the
               police are in the best position to evaluate the
information and take action
               as deemed appropriate.

       I trust that this information is satisfactory.

                                                              Yours sincerely

 A. Anne McLellan”

4.      DAVID RAYMOND AMOS (Plaintiff), a Canadian Citizen and the
first Chief of the Amos Clan, was born in Sackville, New Brunswick
(NB) on July 17th, 1952.

5.      The Plaintiff claims standing in this action as a citizen
whose human rights and democratic interests are to be protected by due
performance of the obligations of Canada’s public officials who are
either elected or appointed and all servants of the Crown whose
mandate is to secure the public safety, protect public interests and
to uphold and enforce the rule of law. The Crown affirms his right to
seek relief for offences to his rights under section 24(1) of the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (Charter). Paragraphs 6 to 13
explain the delay in bringing this action before Federal Court and
paragraphs 25 to 88 explain this matter.

6.      The Plaintiff states that pursuant to the democratic rights
found in Section 3 of the Charter he was a candidate in the elections
of the membership of the 38th and 39th Parliaments in the House of
Commons and a candidate in the elections of the memberships of the
legislative assemblies in Nova Scotia (NS) and NB in 2006.

7.      The Plaintiff states that if he is successful in finding a
Chartered Accountant to audit his records as per the rules of
Elections Canada, he will attempt to become a candidate in the
election of the membership of the 42nd Parliament.

8.      The Plaintiff states that beginning in January of 2002, he
made many members of the RCMP and many members of the corporate media
including employees of a Crown Corporation, the Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation (CBC) well aware of the reason why he planned to return to
Canada and become a candidate in the next federal election. In May of
2004, all members seated in the 37th Parliament before the writ was
dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament and several members of
the legislative assemblies of NB and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL)
knew the reason is the ongoing rampant public corruption. Evidence of
the Plaintiff’s concerns can be found within his documents that the
Office of the Governor General acknowledged were in its possession ten
years ago before the Speech from the Throne in 2004. The Governor
General’s letter is as follows:


  “September 11th, 2004
          Dear Mr. Amos,

           On behalf of Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne
Clarkson,
           I acknowledge receipt of two sets of documents and CD
regarding corruption,
           one received from you directly, and the other forwarded to
us by the Office of
           the Lieutenant Governor of New Brunswick.

                       I regret to inform you that the Governor
General cannot intervene in
           matters that are the responsibility of elected officials
and courts of Justice of
           Canada. You already contacted the various provincial
authorities regarding
           your concerns, and these were the appropriate steps to take.

                                                  Yours sincerely.
                                                              Renee
Blanchet
                                                              Office
of the Secretary
                                                              to the
Governor General”

9.      The Plaintiff states that the documents contain proof that the
Crown by way of the RCMP and the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
Prime Minister knew that he was the whistleblower offering his
assistance to Maher Arar and his lawyers in the USA. The Governor
General acknowledged his concerns about the subject of this complaint
and affirmed that the proper provincial authorities were contacted but
ignored the Plaintiff’s faxes and email to the RCMP and the Solicitor
General in November of 2003 and his tracked US Mail to the Solicitor
General and the Commissioner of the RCMP by way of the Department of
Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) in December of 2003
and the response he received from the Minister of Public Safety/Deputy
Prime Minister in early 2004. One document was irrefutable proof that
there was no need whatsoever to create a Commission of Inquiry into
Maher Arar concerns at about the same point in time. That document is
a letter from the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office
Inspector General (OIG complaint no. C04-01448) admitting contact with
his office on November 21, 2003 within days of the Plaintiff talking
to the office of Canada’s Solicitor General while he met with the US
Attorney General and one day after the former Attorney General of New
York (NY) and the former General Counsel of the SEC testified at a
public hearing before the US Senate Banking Committee about
investigations of the mutual fund industry.

10.  The Plaintiff states that another document that the Plaintiff
received during the election of the 39th Parliament further supported
the fact he was a whistleblower about financial crimes. In December of
2006 a member of the RCMP was ethical enough to admit that he
understood the Plaintiff’s concerns and forwarded his response to the
acting Commissioner of the RCMP and others including a NB Cabinet
Minister Michael B. Murphy QC. The Crown is well aware that any member
sitting in the last days of the 37th Parliament through to the end of
the 41st Parliament could have stood in the House of Commons and asked
the Speaker if the Crown was aware of the Plaintiff’s actions. All
parliamentarians should have wondered why his concerns and that of Mr.
Arar’s were not heard by a committee within the House of Commons in
early 2004. Instead, the Crown created an expensive Commission to
delay the Arar matter while he sued the governments of Canada and the
USA and his wife ran in the election of the 38th Parliament. In 2007,
Arar received a $10-million settlement from the Crown and the Prime
Minister gave him an official apology yet the US government has never
admitted fault. A month after the writ was dropped for the election of
the 42nd Parliament and CBC is reporting Syrian concerns constantly,
Mr. Arar’s lawyer announced that the RCMP will attempt to extradite a
Syrian intelligence officer because it had laid a charge in absentia
and a Canada-wide warrant and Interpol notice were issued. The
Plaintiff considers such news to be politicking practiced by the
Minister of Public Safety. He noticed the usually outspoken Mr. Arar
made no comment but his politically active wife had lots to say on
CBC. Meanwhile, the RCMP continues to bar a fellow citizen from
parliamentary properties because he exercised the same democratic
rights after he had offered his support to Arar by way of his American
lawyers. The aforementioned letter about financial crimes was from the
Inspector General for Tax Administration in the US Department of the
Treasury. Mr Arar’s lawyers, the RCMP, the Canadian Revenue Agency and
the US Internal Revenue Service still refuse to even admit TIGTA
complaint no. 071-0512-0055-C exists. However, the Commissioner of
Federal Court, the Queen’s Privy Council Office and other agencies
were made well aware of it before the Speech from the Throne in 2006.

11.  The Plaintiff states that from June 24, 2004 until the day he
signed this complaint he has diligently tried to resolve the breach of
his rights under the Charter that are the subject of this complaint
with any public official in Canada whom he believed had the mandate or
the ability to request that the Crown investigate and correct the
malicious actions and inactions of the RCMP, Sergeants-at-Arms and
Aides-de-Camp in all jurisdictions. Until June 16, 2006 the Plaintiff
did not have irrefutable proof to support this complaint. Time did not
permit him to address it immediately in Federal Court in 2006 because
his slate was full. For instance on June 16, 2006 while dealing with
deeply troubling private family matters, he was running against the
Attorney General for his seat in the NS provincial election while
arguing members of the RCMP about strange calls he got from someone in
Ottawa who claimed the Department of Public Safety as her client,
dealing with many liberal party members who were about to witness in
Moncton NB the first debate of all those who wished to become their
new leader, assisting a farmer in his attempt to get some authority to
properly investigate the demise of his cattle and discussing with
members of the Saint John NB City Council the actions of a sergeant in
the Saint John Police Force who was calling friends of the Plaintiff
and claiming that he was drug dealing member of a bike gang that they
should stay away from while he was preparing to intervene in pipeline
matter that was about to heard by the National Energy Board in Saint
John .

12.  The Plaintiff states that in April of 2007 he wrote a complaint
about this matter and returned to the Capital District of NB in order
to file it and argue the Crown before the Federal Court if it did not
wish to settle. A clerk of this court informed him that his complaint
was not composed correctly, so he began to rewrite this complaint.
However, as soon as it was known what the Plaintiff was about to file
he was subject to further police harassment and his family began to
suffer from constant slander, sexual harassment and death threats on
the Internet and on the telephone that continues to this very day
while the RCMP, the FBI and many other law enforcement authorities
continue to ignored the obvious evidence of cybercrime practiced
against many people including his minor children.

13.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown’s only response has been
further harassment by the RCMP including false arrest and imprisonment
and theft of his property by the Fredericton Police Force supported by
other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA. The Governor
General has had the Plaintiff’s documents for over ten years to study.
The Crown now has one of the complaints that the RCMP has been
delaying since 2003. It is as follows:

The Complaint

14.  The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 during the election of
the membership of the 38th Parliament the Crown breached his right to
peaceful assembly and association under Section 2(c) and (d) of the
Charter. The Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of NB (a
former member of the RCMP) supported by the Fredericton Police Force
(FPF), the Corps of Commissionaires (COC) and at least one RCMP
officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor barred
the Plaintiff under threat of arrest from the legislative properties
in NB.

15.  The Plaintiff states that whereas the Crown refused to put
anything in writing to either confirm or deny that he was in fact
barred from the legislative properties in NB, he returned to the
public property whenever he deemed it necessary to do so as he ran for
public office three more times. For example, when the Plaintiff was a
candidate in the election of the 39th Parliament for the riding of
Fredericton, he was asked to come into the legislative building of NB
to record a live interview for an Atlantic Television (ATV) news cast
shortly before polling day. On that occasion, the Sergeant-at-Arms and
his Aides-de-Camp did not attempt to bar the Plaintiff from access to
legislative property quite possibly because they did not wish their
actions to be recorded by ATV. However, the Crown made matters worse
in short order. CBC barred the Plaintiff from an all-candidates’
debate on the University of New Brunswick (UNB) campus and on polling
day two District Returning Officers on the UNB campus after viewing
identification threatened to have the Plaintiff arrested stating that
they did not believe he was on the ballot.

16.  The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms continued with
his threat of arrest after the election 39th Parliament. In response,
the Plaintiff challenged the Sergeant-at-Arms to either put his threat
in writing or arrest him so he could at least argue the Crown about
the offences against his rights under the Charter.

17.  The Plaintiff states that on June 16th, 2006 he was on a sidewalk
on Queen Street in Fredericton NB waiting for a friend who was meeting
with the Premier of NB and others inside the legislative assembly
building. Within minutes of his arrival the Sergeant-at-Arms and two
members of the FPF marched out of the building and served a signed
document barring him from public places overseen by the Crown because
some unnamed parties found him in ”Contempt of the House”. The
Sergeant-at-Arms then ordered the Plaintiff off legislative property.
When the Plaintiff pointed out that he was not on legislative property
but on a sidewalk on Queen Street, the Sergeant-at-Arms claimed that
his jurisdiction extended to the middle of the street. The two members
of the FPF identified themselves and agreed that if the Plaintiff did
not cross the street they would arrest him.

18.  The Plaintiff states that after he crossed Queen Street he took a
photograph of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF marching back into the
building to prove date and time of their malice. He sent a photograph
of their barring notice to many people particularly liberal party
members gathering in Moncton, NB that day to hear a debate by those
who wished to replace the former Prime Minister as their party leader.
It was important to do so because a liberal mandate created the
Charter in 1982 compelling all New Brunswickers including the
Sergeant-at-Arms and the police to abide the law within Canada’s only
bilingual province. Any citizen or public official who understands the
Charter and received a copy of the barring notice should have noticed
the Crown had barred a citizen from the legislative properties in NB
in only one official language. No police officer or politician or
Language Commissioner at either a federal or provincial level ever
responded to any inquiry about that fact. The Sergeant-at-Arms of NB
did acknowledge the receipt of a copy of his barring notice years
later but he did so in French only.

19.  The Plaintiff states that the NB Sergeant-at-Arms and his cohorts
in the FPF, RCMP and the COC are well aware that as soon as the
Plaintiff’s friend came out of legislative building on June 16, 2006,
he was given the barring notice to take back inside in order to
inquire about it and the reasons behind it. The COC are clearly named
at the bottom of the document yet the Commissionaires and all the
politicians he encountered that day claimed that they were not allowed
to discuss the barring notice and never would ever since. The
Plaintiff finds that the police, politicians and bureaucrats etc. are
maintaining their oath to the Crown rather than uphold the law and
Sections 2(c) (d), 16(2), 18(2) and 20(2) of the Charter and are
relying on the Crown’s legal counsel to stop him from seeking relief.

20.  The Plaintiff states that the RCMP and the members of the FPF who
harassed the Plaintiff in September of 2006 while he was a candidate
in the NB provincial election would not explain why the NB
Sergeant-at-Arms and the COC had barred him with a document written in
English only or why it was not published in the Royal Gazette. Members
of the FPF who violated the Plaintiff’s privacy trying to read an
email that he was composing on a laptop within his car parked on
private property refused to explain why they thought they had the
right do so as they attempted to interrogate him without a warrant or
due process of law. Members of the FPF refused to take the same
documents the RCMP had so that their major crimes unit could finally
investigate after they demanded that the Plaintiff identify himself so
they could check for warrants for his arrest. The FPF would not
discuss what they would do if he returned to the UNB campus or if he
parked a vehicle and put money in a parking meter on the side of Queen
Street claimed by the Sergeant-at-Arms. In February of 2007 after a
Cabinet Minister of NB acknowledged his concerns with the RCMP, his
children took pictures of the Plaintiff standing on the legislative
property and the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF did nothing that day.
However, the police harassment got worse afterwards. The FPF tried to
call him a criminal while the Plaintiff waited for answers before he
argued the Crown in court about his property that the FPF had
illegally seized. The text of two emails that the Crown and the FPF
sent in 2007 are as follows:

              “Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
               From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
               To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
               Subject:

                   January 30, 2007

                   WITHOUT PREJUDICE

                   Mr. David Amos

                   Dear Mr. Amos:

                         This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of
your e-mail of December
                    29, 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
Because of the
                    nature of the allegations made in your message, I
have taken the
                    measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant
Commissioner Steve Graham
                    of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton .

                   Sincerely,
                   Honourable Michael B. Murphy
                   Minister of Health”

                                                       AND

                “From: “Lafleur, Lou” lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca
                  To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com,
                  Subject: Fredericton Police Force
                  Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300

                         Dear Mr. Amos

          My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the
Fredericton Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you
regarding files that I am investigating and that you are alleged to
have involvement in.

            Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a
message and a phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am
not in my office.
                         yours truly,

                         Cpl. Lou LaFleur
                         Fredericton Police Force
                         311 Queen St.
                         Fredericton, NB
                         506-460-2332

21.  The Plaintiff states that by September of 2007, he was told by
police officers and others that he was barred from the town of
Woodstock, the House of Commons, the National Capital District
including Rideau Hall and the University of Ottawa, the Capital
District of NB including the Lieutenant Governor’s residence and the
University of NB, all other legislative properties in Canada and that
a photograph of him was posted inside the NB legislative building, the
Fredericton airport and at least one mining property guarded by the
Corps of Commissionaires.

22.  The Plaintiff states that on or about September 13, 2007 during a
conversation with the office of the Speaker of the House of Commons he
was referred to the Sergeant-at-Arms in order to find out if the
Plaintiff was truly barred from the House of Commons and if he had
been sent an answer to the documentation the Speaker and the
government of Iceland received in May of 2006. The Sergeant-at-Arms
was apparently well aware of his concerns because he said he knew the
Plaintiff from a past life and quickly hung up the telephone. The
Sergeant-at-Arms never did answer the Plaintiff and ignored all his
contacts ever since.

23.  The Plaintiff states that the odd response from Sergeant-at-Arms
of the House of Commons caused him to research how they knew each
other. The public record states that in June of 2005 the RCMP officer
acting as Aide-de-Camp to the NB Lieutenant Governor retired and
joined the House of Commons as Director of Security Operations. On
September 1, 2006, he became the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of
Commons. Therefore, because of all three of his positions from June of
2004 to December of 2014, the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House of Commons
must have agreed and seconded his fellow Sergeant-at-Arms in NB and
his threats to arrest Plaintiff if he reappeared on parliamentary
property.

24.  The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint about
being illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the most recent
contact from the Crown was the three members of the RCMP who harassed
the Plaintiff at 1:30 AM on December 16, 2014 not long after he had
received an email from a former CSIS agent who is the current
Sergeant-at-Arms of the legislative assembly of Alberta.

The Facts of this Matter

25.  The Plaintiff states that on June 24, 2004 within minutes of his
being barred, the Sergeant-at-Arms, two members of the FPF and one
Commissionaire witnessed him deliver a large number of documents to
the attention of two lawyers in the office of the opposition next
door. He suspects that the Sergeant-at-Arms read at least the cover
letter when his documents were in his care because to support his
right to bar a citizen in front two members of the FPF he falsely
accused the Plaintiff of attempting to serve documents while in the
legislative building.

26.  The Plaintiff states that within the hour of being barred, the
Plaintiff visited the headquarters of the FPF and attempted to meet
with its Chief in order to discuss the false allegations and the
threat of arrest. Whereas a Corporal denied access to his Chief, the
Plaintiff contacted the City Solicitor of Fredericton because he knew
him personally in younger days. After waiting one week for someone to
get back to him, the Plaintiff visited the constituency office of the
Premier and the law office of a former Premier of NB and gave them
many documents with the same cover letter addressing his concern about
being barred from the legislative properties amongst other issues. One
month later the Attorney General of NB sent an answer similar to what
the Deputy Prime Minister sent eight months earlier telling him to
take up his concerns with the police and ignored the issue of a
citizen being barred and threatened by the police. A lawyer acting as
the NB Ombudsman did not wish deal with the government on his behalf
suggested that the Plaintiff take up his concerns with the New
Brunswick Police Commission (NBPC) and introduced them. The Plaintiff,
his wife and a lawyer met with the NBPC. The NBPC acknowledged the
complaint and asked the FPF to investigate their questionable actions.
In the eleven years since the NBPC never responded and the Plaintiff
knows why. The NBPC and Governor General have many of his documents
and one is a letter to the Commissioner of the RCMP. The Plaintiff is
well aware the Chair of the NBPC in 2004 was also the Chief Coroner
whom he testified before on July 15, 1982 and he clearly informed the
Crown he assisted in a successful civil lawsuit against the RCMP about
a wrongful death.

27.  The Plaintiff states that the Sergeant-at-Arms, two
Commissionaires, a librarian, and two members of the FPF knew that the
Plaintiff was in legislative assembly on June 24, 2004 looking for the
“blogger” Charles Leblanc.  While the Plaintiff was waiting for
Charles Leblanc to arrive that day he exercised his democratic right
to witness the proceedings of the Legislative Assembly from the
gallery.

28.  The Plaintiff states that apparently a friend of the Crown put a
new spin on this matter the following day. The Crown’s corporate media
has never said anything about the Crown’s malicious actions barring
him it has had lots to say about the barring the blogger Charles
Leblanc two years later and it has made the arrests and prosecutions
of him well known. On June 25, 2004 Charles Leblanc a well-known
friend of the MLAs, the Sergeant-at-Arms, the Commissionaires, the
RCMP and the Fredericton Police Force falsely reported in the social
media that the Plaintiff had been “shown the door” claiming that he
had attempted to interrupt the proceedings in the Legislature by
speaking from the gallery. The Crown knows if that were true it would
have been recorded in the legislative records. The words of Charles
Leblanc an important witness to be called to testify as to what he
knows about this matter are as follows

       “IS ELVY ROBICHAID SEEING THE LIGHT????
        by Charles LeBlanc Friday, Jun. 25, 2004 at 10:56 AM
        Fredericton updates from Charles

 “There’s always undercovers cops around but only when the House is in
session.  As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but it’s just a
matter of time till someone is push over the edge. I guess a guy name
David Amos was shown the door yesterday at the Legislature. This guy
is running as an Independent candidate in the riding of Fundy Royal. I
met the guy over the net and he has a beef with our political
bureaucrats. I admire people fighting for what they believe in but you
can’t get carried away. I guess in this case? He wanted to speak from
the Gallery and that’s a big faux pas!”

29.  The Plaintiff states that he was not surprised that for the
benefit of his political opponents, servants of the Crown would
practice such malice against a citizen seeking public office. Three
weeks before the Plaintiff was barred in 2004 Elections Canada’s
lawyers waited until the very last minute to admit that section 3 of
the Charter existed and that it affirmed his right to run as an
Independent.

30.  The Plaintiff states that he has studied the actions of
journalists, politicians and their lawyers for many years and has
argued many. He has no doubt that during the time of a federal
election the Crown would not have barred any member of a wealthy well
known political party from any parliamentary property in Canada
without dealing with a Charter argument in court and a host of
journalists almost immediately. With that in mind the Plaintiff
gathered the evidence to support this claim and waited until the CBC
reported that the Prime Minister had asked the Governor General to
drop a writ. Now history tells us all that the writ has been dropped
early in order for the Prime Minister to cause the most expensive and
one of the longest federal elections in the history of Canada on a
date mandated by a law that his wealthy political party created for
its benefit. Now that the stock markets are in a turmoil again the
Office of the Inspector General of the SEC is acknowledging the
Plaintiff’s emails but only after they were made aware that he
received an ethical answer from a global organization that oversees
auditors. Recent events have proven to the Plaintiff that it is
important that he file this action in Federal Court as soon as
possible in order see if the Harer government wishes to continue
barring him from parliamentary property before polling day.

31.  The Plaintiff states that during the election of the 38th
Parliament not one of the employees of the CBC denied the fact that it
had acted in a deliberate partisan fashion and ignored the Crown
Corporation’s mandate. CBC reported that there were five candidates on
the ballot in Fundy but failed to name the Plaintiff in their website
or on the television and the radio. Nothing surprised the Plaintiff
about the actions of the CBC but they should not have laughed at him
when he pointed out other citizens should be afforded equal
opportunity to hear of him.

32.  The Plaintiff states that many politicians knew that the CBC had
hard copy of two lawsuits of his since 2002 and their journalists had
been laughing at him for two years. It was a profound mistake for CBC
to ignore his candidacy now that he did as he promised in a statement
of one lawsuit and was running for public office in Canada. As CBC
continued serving the interests of the politicians who provided the
funding sourced from the Canadian taxpayer other citizens noticed that
the CBC was ignoring his candidacy. One journalist who had laughed at
him called back and tried to make a deal after the Plaintiff had
called the Ombudsman for CBC complaining of him and his associates
only to be laughed at some more and invited to sue CBC. CBC continued
to ignore the Plaintiff even though the popular former CBC reporter
Mike Duffy was now employed by their largest corporate competitor, CTV
and they claimed Fundy was a riding to watch and at least three
newspapers and even the CBC’s blogger friend Charles Leblanc had
chosen to put his strange spin the actions and words of the Plaintiff
while calling him a Hells Angel. However, the aforementioned CBC
journalist did not keep his job very long after his boss and three
directors of CBC received the very same documents and CD that the
Plaintiff’s political opponents had in their possession. (The former
CBC journalist did get a job with the government of NB and has
continued with his obvious malice ever since)

33.  The Plaintiff states that the CBC would not have ignored its
mandate and the standing of a candidate if he or she were a member of
the Liberal Party or the newly merged Conservative parties or the Bloc
Quebecois Party or the Green Party or the New Democratic Party without
expecting to deal with legions of lawyers. CBC had no legal right
whatsoever to ignore the Plaintiff merely because he was an
Independent. In fact the mandate of CBC as a publicly owned
broadcaster dictates that he must not be ignored whether he be a
member of a powerful political party or not. With regards to this
complaint, on June 24, 2004 there were many journalists inside the
legislative properties of NB not just CBC. They published nothing
about the Plaintiff of his running for public office or his being
barred or even after their blogger friend, Charles Leblanc certainly
did.

34.  The Plaintiff states that in June of 2006 Charles Leblanc was
also barred from the same legislative properties but not the Public
Documents Building on the UNB campus. More importantly the
Sergeant-at-Arms was clever enough not to sign or date the English
only document this time. Thus Charles Leblanc who usually demands
things in French from the government when he is in trouble was never
barred at all. The CBC immediately reported the barring of Charles
Leblanc falsely claiming that the Sergeant-at-Arms had signed the
Barring Notice. CBC wrote the Sergeant-at-Arms admitted that he had
barred about six others but did not disclose as to who they were. CBC
did not ask who who the other citizens were because they knew they
would have to name the Plaintiff as well. Many people have protested
the barring of Charles Leblanc and a petition to have it revoked was
placed in the public record of the legislative assembly to no avail.
In 2006 Charles Leblanc was arrested in Saint John and in 2011 in
Fredericton. In 2009 and 2012 the FPF arrested their blogging friend
Charles Leblanc on the legislative properties. The CBC reported each
time but failed to follow up and investigate and report why the Crown
refused to charge Charles Leblanc in both instances. The CBC knows
that as soon as the Plaintiff contacted the politicians and police to
remind them that he would appreciate being called to testify at
Charles Leblanc’s trial as a hostile but ethical witness about the
barring actions of the Crown it would never go forward with the
charges. Leblanc was arrested by the FPF two other times in recent
years and he is on trial right now. The CBC knows the Plaintiff has
talked to members of the RCMP, the FPF, the Saint John Police Force,
the Miramichi Police Force and the Edmundston Police Force who were
investigating Leblanc for various reasons since 2006. The police
usually denied knowing who the Plaintiff was as they refused to answer
his emails. The Plaintiff knows the reason why Charles Leblanc was
barred from legislative property. He agrees with the Crown doing so
but it failed to allow the nasty blogger the right to due process of
law just like it did with and several others. He has never understood
why the Crown has not charged Leblanc under sections 300 and 319 of
the Criminal Code in lieu of arresting him for protesting too loudly
or possible child porn or trespass or punching an equally nasty poetic
beggar.

35.  The Plaintiff states that by the end of November of 2004 a lawyer
in the employ of the Attorney General of NB had answered him in
writing and the FPF, two lawyers, the Mayor and a city councilor of
Fredericton had some very serious email exchanges with the Plaintiff.
The only responses to the Plaintiff about the breach of his right to
peaceful assembly came from the (NBPC) on September 14, 2004
acknowledging his complaint (File no 2110-04-11) and two letters byway
of email from the FPF. On September 30, 2004 a Staff Sergeant of the
FPF wrote that he was in possession of the complaint and requested
evidence to support the Plaintiff’s statement that he had been barred
from the legislative properties for “political reasons not legal
reasons” The Plaintiff responded and suggested that the FPF listen to
the tape of the interview he had with the NBPC and study all the
evidence he gave to the NBPC in the presence of a lawyer as a witness.
The Staff Sergeant responded on October 29, 2004 stating that he had
detailed reports from fellow members of the FPF and he had interviewed
the Sergeant-at-Arms. He claimed that his fellow police officers acted
appropriately and he would inform the Chief of the FPF that he did not
have sufficient cause under the Police Act to investigate the
complaint the Plaintiff registered with the NBPC against the FPF. The
Plaintiff pointed out that the conflict of interest but grateful the
FPF acknowledged the incident. The Mayor of Fredericton found no
humour in that fact and sent the Plaintiff many emails within minutes
no doubt in an effort to overload his email account. In 2003 the
Plaintiff had demanded the Crown investigate the actions of RCMP now
the RCMP should do the same with the Crown because that para-military
police force has jurisdiction everywhere in Canada including all
public and private property controlled by the Crown even military
bases. The words of the Sergeant-at-Arms, Commissionaires and police
were witnessed by only the Plaintiff. A legal action about their
offences against his rights under the Charter would boil down to their
word against his. Evidence was required because he was outnumbered and
attacked by people the Crown employed to understand the law. It was
doubtful they would act ethically and until June 16, 2006 the Crown
refused to put anything in writing to prove this claim about the fact
that the Plaintiff is barred from parliamentary properties.

36.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown is aware that far greater
offences have been practiced within the Capital District of NB by the
FPF and the RCMP against the Plaintiff. Many servants of the Crown
have challenged him to seek relief in a Canadian provincial court. The
Plaintiff will not oblige Crown attorneys of thier desires he will
file in a court of a country at a time he chooses. Time is on the
Plaintiff’s side even though he getting old and was finally allowed to
collect his Canada Pension. His children and grandchildren are still
very young. Whatever was done against the Plaintiff was done against
his Clan as well. All of the Plaintiff’s heirs are Canadian citizens
and two of them are American citizens as well. The Crown, INTERPOL and
the American law enforcement authorities cannot deny that there is no
statute of limitations on certain crimes. The problem the Plaintiff is
finding an ethical journalist to report about the legal actions that
he and the Crown have already been involved in since 1982.

37.  The Plaintiff states that in October of 2004 if the Staff
Sergeant of the FPF had listened to the tape of his interview with the
NBPC and studied the documents they have in their possession he would
not have been so quick to dismiss the Plaintiff and his concerns in
such a fashion. Their many lawyers hardly ever allow corrupt police
officers to admit that the Plaintiff exists or put their malice
towards him in writing. The Plaintiff had explained to the NBPC what
transpired on June 24th, 2004. To explain briefly the police should
have known instantly the Sergeant-at-Arms actions were for political
reasons as soon as he turned in the guest pass and picked up his
documents as he stepped outside the building. While the Plaintiff was
inside the legislative building he spoke to only three employees two
Commissionaires and the librarian. He did not interfere with the
proceedings in the House as he watched the MLAs and their assistants
from the gallery, some of whom he knew personally. He did notice
political pundits in the building. One Cabinet Minister’s assistant
had been following him for a couple of days. His political foes wanted
him off the property immediately but they knew that he was not shy of
litigation if the Crown attempted to place a malicious charge against
him. Therefore they elected the Sergeant-at-Arms to try bully the
Plaintiff.

38.  The Plaintiff states that he satisfied himself as to the reasons
behind the blatant malice once he asked Sergeant-at-Arms and the
police three questions as follows:

(1)     The Plaintiff first asked was why he was being barred from the
legislative property. The Sergeant-at-Arms falsely claimed in front of
the police that the Plaintiff had tried to serve documents on somebody
inside the parliamentary building. The Commissionaires and police knew
that was untrue because they all witnessed the fact that the Plaintiff
had left all the documents in his possession with the Commissionaire
at the entrance before he was allowed into the building and they all
watched him pick up the same documents as he turned in a visitor’s
pass after he was asked to step outside of the building.

(2)     The second question was to the police to see if they agreed to
the false claim of the Sergeant-at-Arms and if they would identify
themselves. After the Sergeant-at-Arms said something quickly in
French and both police officers stated that they agreed with him but
only one would state his name and rank.

(3)     The Plaintiff then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms and the police
if they thought they had jurisdiction over him. They all said yes but
refused to take any documents from the Plaintiff just as the Deputy
Prime Minister suggested.

39.  The Plaintiff states that three people who were mentioned during
the aforesaid meeting with the NBPC were Charles Leblanc, Byron Prior
and the most wanted American gangster Whitey Bulger. All three were
well aware of the Plaintiff and his actions. More importantly the NBPC
were made well aware of the RCMP’s knowledge of his possession of many
American police surveillance wiretap tapes. The NBPC were shown the
very same tapes that he had promised to give to the Suffolk County
District Attorney in the Dorchester District Court of Boston
Massachusetts before a hearing to discuss an illegal summons to answer
a malicious unsigned criminal complaint (Docket no. 0407CR004623).
When the Plaintiff did so he was falsely imprisoned under the charges
of “other”.

40.  The Plaintiff states that an NBPC Commissioner did ask if they
should take the original wiretap tapes. The Plaintiff said no and that
the RCMP already had some but the NBPC could make copies of the ones
before them. The NBPC declined and said they did not have jurisdiction
over the RCMP and that they only wished to investigate why the FPF had
threatened to arrest him on June 24th, 2004.

41.  The Plaintiff states that read a few legal actions involving the
NBPC. He truly believes that NBPC has a mandate to oversee the actions
of the RCMP in the employ of municipalities and the government of NB.
On April 12, 2013 an employee denied that the NBPC it has any concerns
with the RCMP, so he forwarded the NBPC a judgment with an important
statement. Whenever he called the NBPC afterwards she did not allow
him to speak to anyone and denied receiving any emails even though
several were published on the Internet. The judgment pertains to
Miramichi Agricultural Exhibition Association Ltd. v. Chatham (Town)
1995 CanLII 3862 (NB QB). The statement reads as follows:

“Section 20 of the Police Act authorizes the Police Commission to
assess the adequacy of each police force and the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police and determine whether each municipality and the
Province is discharging its responsibility for the maintenance of an
adequate level of policing.”

42.  The Plaintiff states that in 2014 a confidential letter from the
lawyer who is now the chair of the NBPC was published by Charles
Leblanc. Within the aforesaid letter by a lawyer who was an officer in
the Canadian Forces when the Plaintiff was illegally barred in 2004
explained why he and some other unnamed lawyers claimed that the Chief
of the FPF and the NBPC did not have jurisdiction over the legislative
properties in order to investigate the wrongs of the members of FPF
under the Police Act. The lawyers claimed that whereas the police were
acting under the orders of the Sergeant-at-Arms the immunity afforded
them by parliamentary privilege would be undermined if the Chief of
the FPF and the NBPC upheld the law and the Charter.

43.  The Plaintiff states that as soon as he read the aforesaid letter
he had a deeper understanding as to why the NBPC and the FPF had
ignored his concerns for ten years and have refused to answer hard
copy or an email or even come to the phone or return a call for ten
years. He did manage to talk the lawyer who wrote the letter. The
lawyer just like another lawyer who was the Chair of the NBPC since
2004 was offended that the Plaintiff would dare to call his law office
instead of the NBPC. They both knew the reason was because every time
he called the NBPC, the Commissioners and their executive directors
were never available. They definitely did not return calls or answer
emails from the Plaintiff. The assistant who had denied receiving any
emails during his last conversation with her in May of 2015 said that
NBPC was never going to talk to him again. It appears the NBPC believe
that parliamentary privileges extend to them as well. Whether or not
that is true the NBPC must agree that the RCMP have no civilian
oversight whatsoever and that it is the only police force that has
jurisdiction to investigate the actions of the Crown on parliamentary
properties, the Canadian Forces and their semi-retired cohorts within
the Corps of Commissionaires. It appears to the Plaintiff that the
NBPC will not investigate the RCMP and in return the RCMP will not
investigate them. However, they do report to the Crown and the Crown
answers to the citizens it purportedly serves and protects.

44.  The Plaintiff states that claimed parliamentary privileges of
public officials are not above the rule of law just because some
unnamed lawyers deem it to be so. Some of the privileges
parliamentarians lay claim to cannot be found in the Constitution or
any other Act. They are implied by longstanding parliamentary
traditions and seldom challenged in a court of law.

45.  The Plaintiff states that claimed parliamentary privileges must
not be exercised secretly by the Crown against a citizen of an open
and just democracy because he visited parliamentary properties while
exercising his rights under the Charter and attempting to unseat its
political friends. He vividly recalls the last encounter with the
Sergeant-at-Arms that caused the Crown to create a “Barring Notice”.

46.  The Plaintiff states that on or about March 24th, 2006 he went to
the Office of the Conflict of Interest Commissioner of NB to give him
the same documents he had promised the Commissioner of Federal
Judicial Affairs, the Clerk of the Privy Council, Independent MP Andre
Arthur, Independent MLA Tanker O’Malley and many others. The
Commissionaire guarding door would not allow him in the building or
take the documents. The Sergeant-at-Arms must have been notified
because he was soon to appear and threatened to have the Plaintiff
arrested again. He asked why this time. The Sergeant-at-Arms said he
had already been warned to stay off legislative property. The
Plaintiff pointed out the fact that he was not on the legislative
property across the street but if the Crown wished to press false
charges against him the police should be called then he would look
forward to arguing the Sergeant-at-Arms in a court of law. The
Sergeant-at-Arms claimed that they were standing on parliamentary
property but did not call the police.

47.  The Plaintiff states that he then informed the Sergeant-at-Arms
if he thought he had a legal right to bar a citizen from parliamentary
properties he should have the Crown put the reasons to do so in
writing just like the NBPC had demanded of him when he complained of
the Sergeant-at-Arms and the FPF about their malevolent actions
against him two years before. There was no response from the
Sergeant-at-Arms to that simple statement.

48.  The Plaintiff states that he then asked the Sergeant-at-Arms in
front of witnesses if he still thought he had jurisdiction over him on
King Street and the response was yes. So the Plaintiff gave him the
documents and a CD destined for the Conflict of Interest Commissioner
and demanded an answer in writing. The Sergeant-at-Arms took the
documents but refused to sign a receipt for them. He tried to take
picture but the Sergeant-at-Arms crossed King Street and around the
corner too quickly. The Plaintiff received no answer from Conflict of
Interest Commissioner about his concerns. He called and emailed a copy
of the cover letter to the Commissioner’s office to see if it received
his documents and was ignored. The Commissionaire watching that day
knows who took the documents.

49.  The Plaintiff states that whereas there was no federal oversight
of the securities exchange business and no civilian oversight of the
RCMP, he took his concerns to the highest officials of each province
who represented their governments and the Crown. By the end of July in
2005, he emailed and called the offices of the Premiers and Lieutenant
Governors eight provinces. The Premier of Alberta did speak to the
Plaintiff after he staged a parade on Wall Street in order to promote
his province and that conversation did not go well. In early August
2005 he met the Alberta Premier’s challenge and included all provinces
in their argument. The Premiers and Lieutenant Governors received by
way of their Attorney General hard copy of many documents and a CD
similar to those acknowledged by the Governor General and the
Lieutenant Governors of NB and NL in 2004. They were sent by
registered US mail (signature required). Since that time not one
Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General or Premier has responded to the
Plaintiff other than the occasional insulting email. Over the past ten
years the offices of the Attorney Generals for Nova Scotia, Manitoba,
Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia and Newfoundland admitted on
the telephone that his documents are in their files. However, not one
would person was willing to explain why and who had determined his
communication and evidence did not deserve an answer. The offices of
the Attorney Generals for Canada, Ontario, Quebec and Prince Edward
Island denied having anything from the Plaintiff. Those offices could
not explain how registered mail sent signature required to their boss
could get lost. Ten years later several provinces are attempting to
join with the other provinces to oversee the securities exchange
business through one corporation. The Crown must admit that corruption
can be the only reason why all the Attorney Generals in Canada would
continue to ignore a Canadian whistleblower’s documents that employees
and Inspector Generals of the US Treasury Dept. and agents of the
Crown in the United Kingdom have acknowledged beginning in January of
2002. All of the Attorney Generals of Canada should have noticed that
the Plaintiff was capable of creating and arguing lawsuits against the
Attorney General of Massachusetts and embarrassing the US Attorney
when he attempted to make the complaints illegally evaporate “Ex
Parte”. This complaint proves this statement is true.

50.  The Plaintiff states that he has had many conversations with many
Canadian law enforcement authorities etc. about his documentation etc.
and he was usually the one to make first contact. However, in 2008 he
was rather surprised when the office of the Auditor General of Canada
called him on their own accord not long after he had received a
response from the Commission of Public Sector Integrity to a complaint
he made in 2007. The person who called was very elusive about the
reason the Auditor General was contacting him but he gathered from the
brief conversation someone was talking to the Commission of Public
Sector Integrity. So he called the lawyer who just sent him the very
strange response to see if she had changed her mind. She recognized
the Plaintiff voice even though it had been six months since they had
talked and asked him to hold the line. Thus the Plaintiff surmised she
was expecting his call. Apparently she was because the Plaintiff was
surprised once again when a man who would not identify himself came on
the line claiming to be corporate security and threatened to have him
arrested if the Plaintiff ever called their Commission again. The
Plaintiff was not surprised to hear in late 2010 that the Auditor
General had been auditing the Commission of Public Sector Integrity.
The Plaintiff contacted the person in charge of the Freedom of
Information to see if the Auditor General had his complaint. He was
not surprised to see the Office of Auditor General claim that they did
not have his file. What surprised him was the fact that Auditor
General dared to deny it in writing.

51.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware that the last
responses that he received from the Office of the Auditor General, the
Privy Council Office, the Commission of Public Complaints Against the
RCMP, the Commission of Public Sector Integrity and actions of the
RCMP against the Plaintiff in 2014 and 2015 have caused him quit
looking for ethical conduct to come from anyone employed in the public
service of Canada. In March of 2015 byway of an ethical lawyer in
British Columbia the Plaintiff, the Commissioner of the RCMP and his
legal department that whereas the RCMP has refused to investigate
itself then it should at least stop harassing his family and wait to
this lawsuit and his next one.

52.  The Plaintiff states that from July of 1982 until July of 2008
the wrongful actions of the Crown and its cohorts against him were
usually covert and very difficult to prove because it typically
involved the word of the several police officers against his alone.
The Crown should have noticed that amongst the documents that the
Plaintiff provided it in 2004 there are two documents from the
Attorney General of NY. One document was labeled “Re corruption”
(reference no. 04/000233). The Plaintiff forwarded the Attorney
General of Canada amongst others emails containing his recent
communications in 2015 with the Attorney General of NY about that
file. The Crown should be aware that the Attorney General of NY in
2004 became the Governor of NY and that he was arrested by the FBI in
2008 while he was outside of his jurisdiction in the US Capital but
never prosecuted for any offence. The RCMP falsely arrested the
Plaintiff when he returned to the Capital District of NB shortly
afterwards. The RCMP practiced their wrongs on private property
without a warrant or due process of law and never placed any charges
against the Plaintiff as well. The downturn of the stock market in NY
within months of both arrests caused a major worldwide recession. On
October 8, 2008 the Plaintiff finally received an answer from the
Prime Minister of Iceland whose Canadian Ambassador received exactly
the same documents the Speaker in the House of Commons received in May
of 2006 that his Sergeant-At- Arms refused to answer. In December of
2008 Bernie Madoff was arrested by the FBI in NY and by March of 2008
the US Attorney in NY and the SEC in Washington admitted in writing
that the Plaintiff was involved in the Madoff matter and that his
documents had been filed under seal and against the Plaintiff’s
wishes. On September 8, 2015, the Office of the Inspector General of
the SEC sent the Plaintiff and email suggesting that the Plaintiff
file a new complaint within their website. The Plaintiff was quick to
inform the SEC and many law enforcement authorities in Canada of his
indignation as the news broke about the possible criminal actions of
KPMG, the very auditors he was complaining of with regards to his
family’s interests and the Madoff matter. The Plaintiff as usual has
been ignored as of this date. However the Plaintiff has noticed a
sudden upturn in visits to websites where his words and work are
published. It is no coincidence.

53.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown cannot deny that the Arar
matter proved that the Canadian and American law enforcement
authorities have had an agreement to share their questionable
information and that Canadians do suffer from their unconfirmed
suspicions. The very same law enforcement authorities attacked a
whistleblower when he gave them irrefutable evidence to cause an
investigation of their wrongs. A recent judgment of the Supreme Court
of Canada (SCC), Wakeling v United States of America, 2014 SCC 72,
allows the RCMP to share their surveillance wiretap tapes of Canadian
citizens with Americans. However, the RCMP and the FBI etc. do not
wish to deal with American wiretap tapes of a mob that definitely
practices its crimes across many borders. The lawyer working for the
Plaintiff’s wife in a sincere effort to see justice served sent
several of the original wiretap tapes to a US Senator who was a chair
of the US Judiciary Committee after polling day for the election of
the 39th Parliament. The lawyer did so on or about day the Governor
General witnessed the first Conservative Cabinet Ministers of the
current Canadian government swear an oath to the Crown. The Plaintiff
sent proof of this statement to many members of the 39th Parliament
before a confidence vote on its first budget. An opposition member
acknowledged it but ignored it and only answered in a fashion that his
opinions about sending the Canadian Forces into combat agreed with the
Plaintiff’s.

54.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware that until July
15th, 1982 the Plaintiff held a great respect for her servants in the
RCMP. The Crown cannot deny that he explained the reasons for his
change of mind with regards to the RCMP in his communications to the
Commissioner of the RCMP, the FBI, the US Treasury Department and the
Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT)
amongst many others byway of fax and certified US Mail in November and
December of 2003. As the Plaintiff stated in paragraph 3 his ire was
raised when the Deputy Prime Minister chose to acknowledge his
concerns only after he received acknowledgment of a complaint on file
with the US Department of Homeland Security.

55.  The Plaintiff states that he knew in September of 2004 that the
Crown and the Americans were never going to uphold the law in regards
to his concerns as he saw his tracked US Mail to DFAIT being forwarded
elsewhere and his tracked mail to the RCMP evaporated from the Canada
Post records. Furthermore his home phone line was cut right after
Byron Prior notified him he was being much harassed and his American
lawyer Barry Bachrach called to say that recent actions of the FBI and
others had frightened him and that for the benefit of his family he
was staying away from the Plaintiff and not going to court with on
October 1, 2004. The Plaintiff expecting foul play prepared his wife
to notify his Septs who held his Durable Power of Attorney and to
visit Josie Maguire, the same person in the Canadian Consulate in
Boston whom he sent his documents to on December 16, 2003. On October
1, 2004 a judge acted ethically and recused himself after witnessing
the Plaintiff sign an affidavit and file it in the docket of the court
along with hundreds of supporting documents proving the malicious
prosecution by a layman clerk with no mandate to create a criminal
prosecution. On September 3, 2003, the Plaintiff gave the police
surveillance wiretap tapes that he had shown to the NBPC to the
Suffolk County District Attorney before he stood before a sub
municipal court to demand that it prove jurisdiction to hear a
criminal prosecution involving a prison term and what right did a
clerk have to summon a Canadian citizen across an international border
to answer unknown criminal charges after the Boston Police would not
discuss anything with him and the District Attorney claimed in writing
that they were not involved in the matter. The court then changed its
plan and he was called before another judge who read the affidavit and
immediately sent the Plaintiff to jail held under the charges of
“other” in solitary confinement with no chance of bail. The actions of
the Plaintiff’s wife in Boston and his Septs in Canada caused a member
of the RCMP and Josie Maguire to meet with him inside the American
jail to advise him that they could not help him and because he must
obey the laws of other countries he visits and then gave him an
amazing document signed by a judge that had been faxed to them by the
very clerk who had him falsely imprisoned.

56.  The Plaintiff states that in response he thanked the Crown’s
representatives in the USA for the proof of malice and showed them a
faxed copy of the letter from the Governor General dated September 11,
2004 that he had received just before his home phone line was cut. He
informed them that perhaps the Crown should expect a few lawsuits
against it in Canada and the USA then dismissed them.

57.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown and the Americans have always
demanded that the Plaintiff keep his interactions in confidence with
the RCMP, the FBI, the US Treasury Dept. and other secretive law
enforcement authorities. The Plaintiff as a whistleblower about
financial crimes proved that he did keep his concerns with the federal
agents in Canada and the USA in confidence until Canada Day 2002 when
he began filing his exhibits supporting two lawsuits in an American
court. He continued to keep in confidence with the FBI the fact that
he was in possession of hundreds of police surveillance wiretap tapes
until April 1, 2003 when the US Secret Service and the Milton Police
Department appeared at his door in the middle of the night with false
allegations of a presidential threat and threatening extraordinary
rendition because the Plaintiff was a foreign national just like Maher
Arar. The Plaintiff called the RCMP headquarters the following day to
inquire if they were informed about the visit the night before by the
Secret Service. Some lady who claimed she was a lawyer said the RCMP
knew all about the Plaintiff. She hung the phone when she was asked if
the RCMP had listened to the police surveillance wiretap tapes he had
given to the FBI. The conversation with the RCMP lawyer caused the
Plaintiff to begin sharing a true copy of only one wiretap tape with
hundreds of members of the bar and other law enforcement authorities
in Canada and the USA. He has received an incredible number of
incompetent responses. He only sent a few of the responses with the
Crown thus far. There are many more.

58.  The Plaintiff states that it is important to inform the Federal
Court what is on the CD that the Governor General’s office
acknowledged having two copies of in paragraph 8. It is a true copy of
an American police surveillance wiretap tape.

59.  The Plaintiff states that in his opinion he sees no harm in it
being heard in public in Federal Court. He published copies of it in
two American Internet domains in 2008 after the RCMP falsely arrested
him and attempted to have him certified as mentally ill. The actions
of the RCMP caused the Crown to have the problem the American’s have
had since 2004 when they tried the same malicious trick rather than
uphold the law. The problem is that the Plaintiff’s health has no
bearing on irrefutable hard evidence. He should not be in possession
of police surveillance wiretap tapes that offend the civil rights of
many American citizens. With regards to this complaint about being
illegally barred from parliamentary properties, the plaintiff must
point out that the Commissioner of the RCMP and the Minister of Public
Safety knew of the American police surveillance wiretap tapes in 2003.
Furthermore in 2004 the RCMP and a catholic priest had several
original wiretap tapes and the FPF, the NBPC, many members of the bar
and public officials received a true copy of CDs the Governor General
acknowledged before the Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned in the USA.
The aforesaid problem is getting worse because every day more people
around the world are aware of the wiretap tapes and two of the tapes
have been downloaded a number of times by unknown parties. The
Plaintiff cannot take them back even if he wanted to. The public has
always taken far more interest about what is recorded on the wiretap
tapes than his whistleblowing efforts about financial crimes but that
could change anytime. Sooner or later someone will recognize who the
people recorded on the tapes are and it may generate many lawsuits in
the USA without involving the Plaintiff but has many more he has yet
to reveal. The Plaintiff still has a number of wiretap tapes in his
possession and several were stolen by the FPF along with his
motorcycle. Other tapes are scattered about in Canada and the USA with
people he trusts far more than any member of the RCMP or the FBI.
Others tapes are hidden. Many of the wiretap tapes were no longer in
the Plaintiff’s possession for over ten years. He made certain no one
gave him any idea as to where most of the wiretap tapes are hidden but
he secured the proof of the wiretap tapes he had given to the RCMP and
various law enforcement authorities placed in the public record of
American courts and that his former lawyer sent to a US Senator.

60.  The Plaintiff states that before he left the USA, the Plaintiff
made the people he trusts far more than any other Yankee promise that
the tapes would surface if his American family were in jeopardy. It
was no longer safe for a family to live with its father in the USA or
Canada, too many corrupt law enforcement authorities and lawyers
working for mobsters knew he had the wiretap tapes. It was not his
fault that his family lost their interests because of the illegal
actions of family lawyers and their friends within the justice system.
The Plaintiff did the best he could in his Clan’s defence of their
homes and interests. He will die with a clear conscience about that
fact. However, he knew if his Clan suffered in any fashion because of
his actions trying to compel the RCMP and FBI to act ethically it
would be his fault because he knew the federal agents in Canada and
the USA were infinitely corrupt since 1982 when they began to call him
a drug dealer etc.

61.  The Plaintiff states that he and his wife agree that they should
have moved to Canada as they planned when they wed in 1991 but it was
a common decision to stay put in the USA. Simply put, the wiretap
tapes that put his Clan in jeopardy also offered the only way that a
proud but bankrupt father could protect his Clan in his forced absence
from the people he loves far more than life itself. Eleven years later
quite a number of the Yankee mobsters and their lawyers are now dead
or imprisoned. More importantly, the Plaintiff’s children are now
adults and live separately. The Plaintiff sees no need to keep any of
the wiretap tapes in confidence anymore. After the election of the
42nd Parliament, he will begin publishing more wiretap tapes in the
public domain. He will copyright them and consider them a form of
entertainment about true history of the mob and offer them for sale.
Any settlement of any future lawsuit about his knowledge of financial
crimes and his Clan’s stolen assets will be for their benefit and that
of their children. Their lawyers will need their father’s records in
order to assist them to that end. The Crown must understand that this
complaint is one many actions that are part of his records. The
wiretap tapes insure that there will be no statute of limitations.
With regards to this complaint, the Plaintiff reminds the Crown of
paragraph 48 and the Sergeant-at-Arms took a CD and documents.

62.  The Plaintiff states that the Clerk of Federal Court in the
Capital District of NB for reasons he will never understand mailed the
documents back to him instead of mailing them to the Commissioner of
Federal Judicial Affairs who was expecting them. So the Plaintiff
called that Commissioner’s office and then emailed a digital copy of
the cover letter and the clerk’s response and was ignored as well.

63.  The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint the
Crown should obey Section 18(2) of the Charter and serve the document
in two official languages. The “Barring Notice” should state who, when
and why he was found to be in “Contempt of the House”. The Crown
should not try to intimidate a citizen with a threat of arrest for an
implied breach of a contract about trespass on public property not
agreed to by him. The Crown should have published a proper “Barring
Notice” in the Royal Gazette so that all Canadians could read it
before attempting to arrest and charge any citizen for exercising his
right to freedom of assembly in and around the most important public
properties of all Canada.

64.  The Plaintiff states that in 2004 during his research of the Crown barring citizens from parliamentary property, he found mention of Louis Riel being barred from the House of Commons despite the fact he had been democratically elected to the membership therein. However, the Plaintiff could not find anything within the Charteror the Constitution Act, 1967 or the Parliament of Canada Act,or the Criminal Code about how the Crown could take such an action against a citizen who had not been charged and found guilty with breaking an applicable law first. He recorded his opinion of the Crown barring citizens within the cover letters accompanying the documents sent to the Governor General, the Prime Minister, a Canadian Senator, the Arar Inquiry, the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada, the Premier, Attorney General, Speaker of the House and Lieutenant Governor of NB, and the Premier and Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL) and many others. All the public officials ignored the subject of barring.
65.  The Plaintiff states that in the summer of 2004 Byron Prior a Canadian citizen told the Plaintiff that he too was barred under threat of arrest from the legislative building of NL. Many parliamentarians knew that the Plaintiff supported Byron Prior’s pursuit of justice but he did not share his support of two newly merged federal Conservative parties. In return Byron Prior did not support his candidacy in the election of the 38th Parliament. They remained friends until April of 2005. They did not consider Byron Prior’s barring a coincidence so they decided to include Byron Prior in the Plaintiff’s matters in order to show their support of each other’s concerns about justice for their families. The Plaintiff has monitored Byron Prior’s actions ever since although they are no longer friends. Byron Prior enjoyed receiving a copy of one response in particular and he and his associates used copies of some the Plaintiff’s documents within at least five legal actions.
66.  The Plaintiff states that the response from the Lieutenant Governor of NL is contrary to the opinions of the Deputy Prime Minister of Canada and the Attorney General of NB. Clearly he believed that the Attorney General of his province had the power to have crimes investigated. The text of the letter Crown’s vice regal representative in NL is as follows:

                                        GOVERNMENT  HOUSE                                   

                                      Newfoundland and Labrador
                                                                                             “September 10th, 2004
     Dear Mr. Amos:  
    The Lieutenant Governor has asked me to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 2 September, addressed directly to him, the Honourable Danny Williams, the Honourable John Crosbie and Mr. Brian Furey. He has asked me to tell you that he has neither the authority nor the responsibility over matters such as those raised in your letter and the associated material. 
     Accordingly at his instructions, I have sent the material to the Honourable Thomas Marshall, QC, the Attorney General and Minister of Justice for Newfoundland and Labrador, with the request that he take whatever further action he considers necessary and appropriate to deal with it.
                                                Sincerely yours,            
                                                                  Leona Harvey      
                                                                  Secretary to Lieutenant Governor”
67.  The Plaintiff states that in 2004 the 37th Parliament and many others in NB and NL were informed that he knew of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and that he supported their pursuit of justice byway of the social media. He called his fellow Maritimers after reading their words about politicians and listened to the reasons why they were collecting social assistance and could not afford computers. They did not care about his concerns with politicians but he believed them and offered his assistance by giving them computers. The Plaintiff asked that they publish the truth about his actions and to serve politicians copies of his documents. Leblanc publicly insulted the Plaintiff after receiving his computer and stole documents he promised to give to the Attorney General of NB and gave them to his activist friends instead. Leblanc was asked why behaved in such a fashion and he wrote back that he thought he was being funny and stated that he was not a sheriff then sent an email asking if the Plaintiff was a fair comparison to his dog. That email convinced the Plaintiff that Leblanc was a Conservative insider because he had apparently read a letter sent to the Attorney General. It did not take the Plaintiff long to figure out who his activist friends were because Leblanc had forwarded their email address along with pictures of his dog. Prior was difficult to deal with but he was true to his word. It was he who delivered the documents to the parties named in paragraph 53. In 2005 Prior was sued for libel within his website. The Plaintiff wrote his defence and counterclaim and it remained on the Internet until 2010. Prior’s one website had more visitors than all the blogs of Leblanc until late 2006 when the New York Times reported that a judge found Leblanc not guilty in a criminal trial and considered him to be a legitimate journalist. As the readership of his blog soared, Leblanc and all politicians became much better friends. In 2007 the Irving media empire complained of the Plaintiff and Leblanc to Google and Yahoo. In response the Plaintiff’s blog, two email accounts and all his legal documents stored within Yahoo’s domain were deleted. Leblanc’s blog was deleted then restored. The FPF arrested Leblanc again in 2012. The Plaintiff reminded the Crown of a judgment of Byron Prior finding Section 301 of the Criminal Code unconstitutional and law professors came to Leblanc’s aid. The Plaintiff caused Leblanc’s “other personality” blogto be deleted not the FPF.  
68.  The Plaintiff states that the Crown is well aware of three legal actions against Byron Prior. One action is a civil lawsuit for libel filed in Supreme Court of NL in January of 2005 against Byron Prior by a MP and that a publication ban was placed on the matter immediately. Two are criminal prosecutions of Byron Prior for libel. One prosecution under section 301 of the Criminal Code was found to be unconstitutional in 2008. The Plaintiff was falsely imprisoned by the RCMP in a mental ward of a hospital after he spread the word that the Crown had lost. The Plaintiff does not know the judgment in the second trial under section 300. He does know that in 2009 Byron Prior filed some of the Plaintiff’s documents in the docket before he was imprisoned in a mental hospital until early 2010.
69.  The Plaintiff states that it was not logical that Crown considered Byron Prior’s actions on the legislative properties in NL criminal. The Crown was arresting and prosecuting him in NL while the RCMP were issuing him permits to do exactly the same thing in front of the House of Commons for months at a time from the spring of 2006 to at least the spring 2011. The Crown prosecutes and defends all criminal actions at a provincial and federal level. If the Crown was sincere in its prosecution of Byron Prior it should have arrested him on the grounds of the House of Commons in the spring of 2006. Instead the Crown had the RCMP and a lawyer whom the Plaintiff ran against in the election of the 38thParliament investigate Byron Prior’s concerns at the request of his MP (Later appointed a Senator) and the Minister of Justice (Who his left seat in the 41st Parliament midterm as Minister of Public Safety and was appointed to be a judge).
70.  The Plaintiff states that with regards to this complaint he knows for certain that because of his association with Byron Prior in early 2004 the Crown has had a conflict of interest that affects the interests of nearly all the federal and provincial political parties of Canada. The Crown is well aware that a law firm of a former Premier and a MP of NL represented Byron Prior in the past. The Prime Minister and his current Attorney General are well aware the Plaintiff published copies of letters from them to Byron Prior as they sat in opposition of the 37th Parliament.
71.  The Plaintiff states that in his opinion banning the publication of legal documents after a public official sues a citizen for libel or when the Crown decides to prosecute the same citizen twice for libel does not serve the public interest and raises many questions about the actions of the Crown. Whereas the Plaintiff truly believes such actions only serve to protect the Crown and public officials from being embarrassed by their words and deeds since 2002 he has published on the Internet every document involving him that he has deemed necessary to expose the public corruption just like Byron Prior did beginning in 2002. That was how Byron Prior discovered the Plaintiff and contacted him in early 2004 and the Plaintiff discovered and contacted Charles Leblanc in Fredericton NB and later introduced them to Werner Bock of NB and his concerns. The Plaintiff believes that is why the Crown bars and imprisons its opponents who are adept with the social media. Corporate media protects privacy and never mentions the malice because like Louis Riel the Crown has deemed the poor souls to be mentally ill.
72.  The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary, Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the Plaintiff ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had researched Byron Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of Justice in late 2006 has not been made public. More importantly the lawyer who has been the MP representing Fundy Royal for the past eleven years and that the former Minister of Public Safety acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about Byron Prior that contained the entire text of his website before the writ was dropped for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email exchange has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on the Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed. The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find published on the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman” character named Max published within the YouTube domain. It was an interview of Byron Prior as he was protesting on the grounds of the House of Commons the day after the Prime Minister was found in “Contempt of Parliament” and his most contemptuous minority mandate became a matter of history. His majority mandate is history and the Plaintiff seeks relief.
73.  The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons during 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the Plaintiff but he does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the same street as the Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is being prosecuted by the Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It is unlikely he would move far from the city soon. If the Crown wishes to argue this complaint Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc should be summoned to testify about what they know of this matter and of their being illegally barred from parliament properties as well. Failing that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of documentation including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide byway of digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the concerns of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the Plaintiff and many others.
74.  The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff that she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and while visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by the RCMP and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert area of Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency offices of the Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded her emails to and from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former Premier and the office of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff to support her. The Plaintiff introduced himself to all the aforementioned parties in order to assist Robin Reid and they were ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff discovered he could no longer assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the actions of Neo Nazis who supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP and many other law enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well aware of the reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people in any fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown but their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.  
75.  The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel, sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom. The actions of these Trolls created an important example of cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs and videos published about his family before the malice was removed from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee. A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells, who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry Winters and his blogs. 
76.  The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to university students and anyone else who will listen to them particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan.He considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
77.  The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations. 
78.  The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior. The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know that some programs allow cyberbullies to pretend to be anyone by having their telephone numbers (including that of the RCMP or the EPS) appear on their victims’ phone display. The Crown knows commercial programs assist in political deceit. Recently, it sent a former assistant of the MP the Plaintiff ran against Fundy-Royal in 2004 to jail because of robo calls.
79.  The Plaintiff states that he has clearly explained his intentions to sue the EPS and the RCMP many times because they have been ignoring his complaints for eight years. It was obvious to him what the EPS was trying to do with him in June was trick. The RCMP has been trying to pull the same trick on the Plaintiff since 2003. The Crown knows that if the EPS managed to secure a complaint with the Plaintiff’s signature then it would delay his lawsuit because the EPS could claim that his complaint under investigation and that the EPS could say nothing about it until the matter had concluded. The Plaintiff informed the EPS that anyone could use an anonymous phone number and claim to be anyone if it wished to talk then it should do so from an identifiable telephone line or put it in writing just like he does. In fact the Plaintiff’s family have been getting anonymous calls for many years and the police claimed they could do nothing because the malicious calls came through the Internet. The RCMP would have acted ethically if the families of public officials were subject to the harassment his Clan has suffered instead of assisting in the illegal barring from the parliamentary properties of Canada. 
80.  The Plaintiff states that the subject of the Crown and Internet harassment became incredibly worse in 2007 long before the demise of two Canadian teenagers caused new cyber laws to be created and promptly ignored. In 2008 while the Plaintiff’s family and friends were being much harassed within many YouTube Channels by Trolls, the RCMP in NB created a YouTube channel of its own to use as tool to catch a local arsonist. As soon as the Plaintiff made a comment about eleven incidents of arson on his friend’s farm in the same area the Plaintiff and his friend were attacked by many Troll’s within the Crown’s domain within YouTube and the RCMP only laughed at the obvious malice that they were publishing for a year without attempting to moderate the comments. In early 2009 the comments within the RCMP YouTube channel change greatly with the arrest and imprisonment of members of the Tingley family pertaining to charges of “Organized Crime”. The libel continued until Werner Bock printed all the comments within the RCMP YouTube channel and delivered hard copy of it in hand to a local office of the RCMP.  Once the Plaintiff had a conversation with a member of the RCMP in Moncton NB who was investigating Bock’s complaint, the RCMP took down their video with all the comments and said nothing further about it. The Plaintiff did manage to save most of the comments digitally before they were deleted by the Trolls and the RCMP. Years later the Crown stayed the “Organized Crime” charges against the Tingleys and a publication ban was placed on their concerns about malicious prosecution. The matter was put before the Supreme Court of Canada Rodney Tingley, et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen SCC Docketno. 34107 and the Plaintiff had no idea of any outcome. However in late 2014 he did speak with some of the Tingleys and they admitted to knowing about him and his common concerns with the RCMP. One Tingley stated that their lawyers have advised them not to speak to him because of the publication ban. The same holds true with his former friend Werner Bock and Hank Temper another German who moved to NB to farm. They had trouble with the RCMP acting against them. A search on the Internet with their names and the Plaintiff’s easily proves his assistance but they will never acknowledge it as they attack the Crown, Bock byway of social media and Tepper byway of lawsuit.
81.  The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking that was before the SCC.  The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring him from legislative properties while he running for public office. 
82.  The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015 particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes. The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today. In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’ bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian involvement in the War on Iraq.
83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war in Iraq again itdid notserve Canadian interests and reputation to allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over five years after he began his bragging:  
Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau

Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway campaign of 2006.
What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. 
The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,” or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits are not.
Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy” David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing, marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security, and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.

Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now

From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.

>>>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil, Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca, milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca, sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari  <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower  <whistleblower@ctv.ca>

I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on  CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is interesting though

http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
 
Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right

The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a shy political animal
 
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
 
Enjoy Mr Weston
http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html

"But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
including a Canadian general.
 
That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000 U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
 
http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
 
"I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying into the US policy.

At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there were deployed WMD.
 
Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.

There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was onerous
 
American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which  ....not necessarily in that order. "

You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
Adams? of the CSE within the DND?

84.  The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21, 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the Plaintiff stated in public in Prince George BC on August 21, 2014 were recorded by the Neo Nazi and published on the Internet and the RCMP knows the Plaintiff stands by every word. For the public record the Plaintiff truly believes what Lonnie Landrud told him despite the fact that he does not trust his Neo Nazi associates. Therefore the Plaintiff had no ethical dilemma whatsoever in publishing the statement Lonnie Landrud mailed to him in a sincere effort to assist Lonnie Landrud’s pursuit of justice. The Crown is well aware that Plaintiff’s former lawyer, Barry Bachrach once had a leader of the American Indian Movement for a client and that is why he ran against the former Minister of Indian Affairs for his seat in the 39th Parliament.
85.  The Plaintiff states that while he was out west he visited Edmonton AB several times and met many people. He visited the home of Barry Winters and all his favourite haunts in the hope of meeting in person the evil person who had been sexually harassing and threatening to kill him and his children for many years. The Crown cannot deny that Winters invited him many times. On June 13, 2015 Barry Winters admitted the EPS warned him the Plaintiff was looking for him. 
86.  The Plaintiff states that on December 15th, 2014 the Crown in Alberta contacted him byway of an email account he seldom uses since his last communications with the Sergeant-at-Arms and Robin Reid. The Sergeant-at-Arms wanted to know about a contact he had that day with the constituency office of a recently appointed Cabinet Minister. All the other statements in this complaint should prove that the Plaintiff knew why a political lawyer from NB was ignoring a new constituent’s contacts all summer after answering a message in Twitter promising to meet with him. It was obvious to the Plaintiff that as soon as the lawyer was a Cabinet Minister he was attempting to use his influence to intimidate the Plaintiff byway of the Sergeant-at-Arms like his political associates in NB did in 2004.
87.  The Plaintiff states that before he had a chance to respond to the email from the Sergeant-at-Arms of Alberta, three members of the RCMP members in plain clothes were pounding on the basement entrance of a condo at 1:30 AM. They did not identify themselves as being the police as they attempted to harass the Plaintiff on private property in the middle of the night without a warrant. The Plaintiff was twice the age of the oldest one and considered them to be tough talking kids who were trying to enter a home in the middle of the night so as he closed the door he told them he was calling the cops. They hollered on the other side of the door that they were the cops as the Plaintiff called their headquarters and was immediately patched through to them. The Plaintiff refused their request when RCMP tried to con him into coming outside in freezing temperatures in the middle of the night so they could supposedly speak with him instead of saying what they needed to say over the telephone. If what the RCMP was saying was remotely true then they should have identified themselves and asked for him instead of someone else when he answered the door. The Plaintiff’s response to the RCMP’s trickery was that it was best that they communicate in writing and that he would be contacting their lawyers in the morning. The Crown received its very justifiable responses and the law was not upheld. The Plaintiff was ignored as the RCMP continued to harass his family deep into the New Year as he headed for the BC coast then back to the Maritimes to run for public office again. 
88.  The Plaintiff states that in regards to this complaint the actions and inactions of the Sergeant-at-Arms and the RCMP in Alberta affirmed to the Plaintiff that he is still barred under threat of arrest from all parliamentary properties in Canada because they did not deny it. The RCMP does not have the integrity to talk to or email him about anything because they know he tries to record everything just like they do. Instead of acting ethically the standard operating procedure of the RCMP since 2004 is to intimidate his friends and family in a malicious effort to impeach his character and separate them. That is the reason the Plaintiff stays away from most people most of the time. The actions of the RCMP towards the Plaintiff and many others and his experiences in the USA served to convince him that the Crown acts just like corrupt Americans. In order to cover up wrongs it would prefer to injure and imprison ethical citizens in mental wards rather than uphold the law or argue them publicly in a court of law. In 2002 the Plaintiff explained why he would seek public office in Canada to American lawyers he was suing within statements of a lawsuit about legal malpractice. Now he is doing the same to Canadian lawyers in the employ of the government whose wages are once again being paid by his fellow taxpayer. As the Plaintiff prepares to deal with a predicable motion to dismiss and a motion for a publication ban to delay and conceal this matter before polling day perhaps the lawyers working for the Crown should study the Plaintiff’s work found within documents in the Governor General’s office. Trust that he will look forward to talking to the first lawyer to answer this complaint because it has been years since he could get any lawyer in Canada to discuss anything with him. There is no ethical dilemma to be found in this statement, the Crown counsels should just do their job according to the law of the land, seek the documents in the possession of the lawyer who is the Governor General of Canada and let the political cards fall where they may. In closing the Plaintiff must remind the Crown that two members of the Canadian Forces acting as security for the Highland Games held on the grounds of the Lieutenant Governor’s residence in NB approached the Chief of the Amos Clan claiming that an unnamed party found him “overbearing”. He gave them a copy of the Governors General’s letter and freely left the parliamentary property.
Jurisdiction and Venue
89.  The Plaintiff states that Federal Court has jurisdiction in this claim against the Crown pursuant to section 17 (1) of the Federal Courts Act and he proposes that this action be tried at Fredericton, New Brunswick.
90.  The Plaintiff prays that the Federal Court does not strike this complaint against the Crown. It is not without merit nor is it abusing of the process of this Court. This claim is definitely not frivolous or vexatious or immaterial or redundant.
91.  The Plaintiff states he is not a lawyer or studied law at any law school. This is a Pro Se complaint composed by him to the best of his ability as a layman after studying Canadian laws on his own for ten years. He is compelled to act Pro Se because not one lawyer of the many whom he has approached in Canada and the USA over the course of the past fifteen years would assist him in any complaint that would impeach the character of an auditor or a fellow member of the bar or embarrass a justice system in which they practice law for a fee. However, many lawyers have been paid from the Plaintiff’s interests as they worked diligently to cover up many wrongs practiced against his family for many years. The Plaintiff considers two of the most offensive to him are the lawyers who are the current Governor General and Attorney General of Canada. The Plaintiff is acting upon a suggestion of a former Governor General after diligently attempting to settle this matter with all the Attorney Generals of Canada and the RCMP for twelve years.
92.  The Plaintiff states that must restate the simple truth of this matter. It still is as he explained to the NBPC in 2004. The Sergeant-at-Arms in NB illegally barred the Plaintiff for political reasons. His actions as a whistleblower the RCMP and the liberal federal government were the reasons. The Plaintiff met former Premiers Bernard Lord and David Alward (Consular in Boston) On October 3, 2006, Premier Lord studied the “Barring Notice”after being thanked for putting the Crown’s malice in writing. Alward and a RCMP member heard Lord claim he knew nothing about it and suggest that the Plaintiff sue the Sergeant-at-Arms. 
93.   The Plaintiff states that on October 3, 2006 he quickly proved what the political lawyer Bernard Lord had claimed in front of his former Cabinet Minister was not true by presenting him with a document signed by his former Attorney General. Bernard Lord quickly responded that the Plaintiff should sue him too. The former Premier had nothing further to say when he was shown a copy of the Plaintiff’s cover letter that came with the documents and CD given to his constituency office in Moncton NB in early July of 2004. The Plaintiff complained of Premier Lord expelling him from the legislature building for political reasons not legal within the first paragraph of the aforesaid cover letter. The Attorney General had answered the Plaintiff on the Crown’s behalf after admitting he had received the documents given to Premier Lord and another former Premier Frank McKenna the year before his was appointed to be the Canadian Ambassador to the USA. 
94.  The Plaintiff states that on October 30, 2006, after he had read the news and discussed Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar matter with many people that he knew Wayne Easter and Commissioner Giuliano Zacardelliwere profound liarshe received a callfrom Sgt. Vaillancourt of J Division of the RCMP. The Plaintiff refused to make a deal with the RCMP and his reasons were published on the Internet for years. Wayne Easter’s words quoted by CBC were the reason the RCMP called. They are as follows:
“Wayne Easter, the former solicitor-general who presided during the Arar ordeal, appeared to contradict earlier testimony from RCMP head Giuliano Zacardelli today when he answered questions at a commons committee. Responding to Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report on the Arar case at the public safety and national security committee, Easter said he was never told the RCMP had passed on false information to the United States and was never told the RCMP tried to correct it, as claimed by Zacardelli.

“I was not informed that the RCMP had provided inaccurate information to the U.S.,” Easter told the MPs.”
95.  The Plaintiff states that whereas the Prime Minister apologized to Maher Arar on behalf of Canada and made $10-million settlement after the government wasted several years and squandered an incredible amount of taxpayer funds on legal fees generating Justice Dennis O’Connor’s report, the Plaintiff deserves at least the same sort of settlement in this matter.
96.  The Plaintiff states that whereas he has been barred from access to parliamentary properties for a period of eleven years and that the aforesaid properties include ten provinces and the Nation’s Capital District the apologies and amount he seeks in settlement is very reasonable and certainly justified.
The plaintiff therefore asks this court for the following relief:
(a)    A public apology by the Prime Minister and each Premier for the illegal barring of a citizen from access to parliamentary properties.
(b)   A declaration signed by the Minister of Public Safety and witnessed by the Governor General stating that the Canadian government will no longer allow the RCMP and the Canadian Forces to harass the Plaintiff and his Clan.
(c)    A settlement of eleven million dollars ($11,000,000.00) in the form of relief and punitive damages for being barred from eleven parliamentary properties for eleven years.
(d)   Costs to the Plaintiff in bringing this matter before the court
Dated at Fredericton, NB the 15th day of September 2015
_________________________________                                                                     
Plaintiff  David Raymond Amos
P.O. Box 234
Apohaqui, NB, E5P 3G2
Telephone no.: (902) 800-0369
Fax no.: (506) 432-6089
Email : David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com

"We're from the Government and we're here to help you"?

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/agent-orange-gagetown-eyewitness-1.4673641


Ex-soldier says he watched barrels of Agent Orange being buried at Gagetown base

Did the Canadian military actually track down all of its stocks of the dangerous defoliant?



338 Comments



Joseph Cluster 
Joseph Cluster
What really is disheartening is the Gov't/military at the time let the US military use our troops as lab rats in the testing of this chemical.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Joseph Cluster Methinks Murray Brewster should read paragraph 83 of my lawsuit against the Queen sometime N'esy Pas?


John Jacobs
John Jacobs
@David Amos
Don’t you mean ‘n'est-ce pas’?


David Amos
David Amos
@John Jacobs NOPE

Patrick Smyth
Patrick Smyth
@John Jacobs

A complainer extraordinaire and irreverent as they come who happily wears his ignorance and arrogance on his sleeve.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Patrick Smyth Methinks that is a perfect description of yourself It appears that you finally got something right for a change N'esy Pas?


Art Rowe
Art Rowe
@David Amos
Well you should, because your ""N'esy Pas"" certainly isn't French.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Art Rowe Methinks I never said it was however it certainly upsets English "Know It Alls" N'esy Pas?


Kathy Altenhofen
Kathy Altenhofen
@John Jacobs No, he doesn't. He loves showing his disrespect for all things French Canadian.

Kathy Altenhofen
Kathy Altenhofen
@David Amos No, it just shows your lack of maturity and complete insensitivity to Canada's French populace.



David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Kathy Altenhofen Not True Its French Men I love to tease. (Trust that I count quite a few French Maritimers as friends)

More importantly methinks everybody knows that I love the French Ladies dearly N'esy Pas?


Kathy Altenhofen
Kathy Altenhofen
@David Amos I'm sure all the French ladies carry 10 foot poles and bear spray on the off chance they see you approaching.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Kathy Altenhofen "it just shows your lack of maturity and complete insensitivity to Canada's French populace."

Would you say that to me in defense of your hero Trudeau the Younger or his political foe Mr Harper during the last election?

Methinks that you make a fine example of why many Maritimers (French and English and particularly Scottish ones) find German folks awful snobby N'esy Pas?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

David Amos
David Amos
@Joseph Cluster This the first portion of paragraph 83 of my lawsuit against the Queen

Federal Court File No: T-1557-15

83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over five years after he began his bragging:

January 13, 2015
This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate

December 8, 2014
Why Canada Stood Tall!

Friday, October 3, 2014
Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
Stupid Justin Trudeau

Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.

When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to redeploy troops from there to Iraq.

David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos More

The PMO’s thinking that it was less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway campaign of 2006.

What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.

What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.

The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.


David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos More

President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,” or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@David Amos More

One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits are not.

Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy” David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos 
 @David Amos More

In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing, marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.

My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.

Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security, and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.

Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now

There is LOTS MORE



William Carver
William Carver
@David Amos

saving Afghanistan?

I suppose it depends on the metrics considered.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@William Carver Methinks its rather hard to consider anything I posted after CBC deleted so many of my comments N'esy Pas?


Myron deNiverville 
Myron deNiverville
This CBC website could use a barrel of whitewash and someone that knows how to design a website that's easier to use.


David Amos
David Amos
@Myron deNiverville YUP


Joseph Cluster 
Joseph Cluster
Wife had an Uncle that received a compensation package for the effects of getting sprayed with this chemical. He was grateful for the monies received but chuckled at the actual amount in relation to the suffering he went through.


David Amos
David Amos
@Joseph Cluster Chuckles eh?

I remember dealing with this Agent Orange issue as I ran in the election of the 39th Parliament in the Fredericton riding while CBC laughed and ignored me as I was barred me from the debates even an all candidates debate they hosted on the UNB campus. Later I was ordered from UNB polling station under threat of arrest because they did not believe I was the guy whose name was on the ballot.

Methinks that at least your uncle is 20 grand ahead of me with any settlement with the crooks Perhaps that why he chuckled N'esy Pas?

Aaron Morris
Aaron Morris
@David Amos

Looks like someone has been smoking to much 2,4,5-T

Aaron Morris
Aaron Morris
@Aaron Morris

two*

;)


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Aaron Morris Methinks that we all know that you brag too much N'esy Pas?


Robbie Adams 
Robbie Adams
"""Agent Orange was sprayed at CFB Gagetown in 1966 and 1967 by the U.S. military, with permission from Canada."""

Pollute our country. No bases in the US where they could have tested the stuff. Maybe the yanks should be paying for all of this


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Robbie Adams Methinks you should ask Monsanto what they thinks of your idea N'esy Pas?

  
Mike Trout
Jason Martin
The government fought veterans seeking benefits for illness from exposure to agent Orange for decades. They refused to admit culpability. Sound familiar?

February 1, 2018
Justin Trudeau, "Because veterans are asking for more than the government can give right now".

One and done in 2019.


Mike Trout
Mike Trout
@Jason Martin

This says it all about the "pm" Justin and his Liberal "government".

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/justin-trudeau-town-hall-edmonton-1.4515822

ABTL 2019

David Amos
David Amos
@Mike Trout Anyone believe this?

"I have pledged, and I did pledge and I will continue to pledge that I will do right by you," Trudeau said. "The changes that we've made to our support for veterans are based around recognizing where we went wrong before."

Survey Says?


carol e. kudla 
carol e. kudla
our not so clean past! we have nothing to brag about with any of our governments' behaviour. now or then


Curtis Harvey
Curtis Harvey
@carol e. kudla - When it comes right down to it the liberals have been far, more despicable in their actions toward our veterans and soldiers as a whole than the Conservatives and the Conservatives treated them very badly indeed.

David Amos
David Amos
@Curtis Harvey Methinks the Conservatives were far worse because they are the ones who put our Armed Forces in harms way in 2006 for no good reason whatsoever N'esy Pas?


  
Michael Larsne
James Watson
"We're from the Government and we're here to help you"?

Scariest words you are ever gong to hear!


David Amos
David Amos
@James Watson Every time a politician or bureaucrat say the words "How can I help you?" I hang up the phone

Michael Larsne
Michael Larsne
@David Amos right up there with "Believe me ..."


Michael Larsne 
Stephen McIntyre
"I would speculate that the government would have taken it more seriously if he had come forward earlier"

Ha! I speculate that the government would have buried his testimony deeper than the barrels. This man, the messenger, is not the problem.


David Amos
David Amos
@Stephen McIntyre Methinks this revelation is way past too late for most of the old veterans Money ain't much good to the dead and dying and the crooks who ordered the barrels hidden are no doubt long gone as well N'esy Pas?



Scott Wilson 
Scott Wilson
Trump uses it to color his hair.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Karin Bougie "Just like the guy on here making this about Trudeau, your Trump obsession is just as bad."

Methinks because of your comment I will singing Stormy Monday all day maybe some other folks will join in N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@David Amos Why on earth would CBC block that comment?

  
Matthew Smith
Matthew Smith
C'mon! without Agent Orange we wouldn't have had the money to develop Round-Up...same company Monsanto/Dow...


Matthew Smith
Matthew Smith
@Richard Nichols Do they not teach it in school any longer???

David Amos
David Amos
@Matthew Smith YUP


Matthew Smith 
Michael G. L. Geraldson
I wouldn't be at all surprised if they and many other dangerous substances were buried there and around the rest of the country. Not that I'm excusing it, but those with different times with a different mindset. I also remember planes flying overhead in the summer and fogging entire towns with insecticides, something nobody would tolerate today.


David Amos
David Amos
@Michael G. L. Geraldson Methinks they are spraying the same stuff today all over the province It just has a different name tis all N'esy Pas?

  
Gemma Schofield
Glen robert
What about all the chemicals left in bases in the far north?


Jean St. Amour
Jean St. Amour
@Glen robert

Oh the thousands of liters of PCB's that the Americans left behind after they abandoned all their radar stations that we let them build in Canada?

David Amos
David Amos
@Jean St. Amour Good point
  

Gemma Schofield
John Sollows
Back in the late '60's/early '70's there was an American proposal to build the world's largest power source (12,000 MW) on a small island in SW Nova Scotia. Nuclear, of course.

Local lobster fishermen expressed concern about how it might affect their livelihood, and there were a few other questions raised. Reassuring "No evidences.." abounded.

Then a local author said, "Why aren't they building it on their side of the water?"

And there has been dead silence ... ever since.

Thank you, Hattie Perry. R.I.P.


David Amos
David Amos
@John Sollows Have you read NAFTA or FATCA?


Murray Darren 
Murray Darren
Here we go again folks Blame it on Harper lol


Kathy Altenhofen
Kathy Altenhofen
@Murray Darren Another whiny rightie....


David Amos
David Amos
@Kathy Altenhofen "Another whiny rightie...."

Methinks you are the polar opposite Nesy Pas?

Kathy Altenhofen 
John Sollows
It would be nice to know what's buried at various other former American operations.

There's a large, fenced-in area not far from a former American base in Baccaro. N.S., for instance.

Don't know why it's fenced in. Maybe CBC could investigate...


David Amos
David Amos
@John Sollows Good luck with that one.


Ex-soldier says he watched barrels of Agent Orange being buried at Gagetown base

Did the Canadian military actually track down all of its stocks of the dangerous defoliant?


Former military police officer Al White says he watched barrels of Agent Orange being buried at CFB Gagetown in 1985. (CBC News)

It is a 33-year-old mystery that has gnawed at retired sergeant Al White's conscience.

The now-former military police officer told CBC News that, before sunrise on a clear morning in the late spring of 1985, he was ordered to escort a Department of National Defence flatbed truck along an empty road at CFB Gagetown in New Brunswick. The journey took just minutes and ended in shadows just off the road, where an excavator had dug a wide, fresh pit in the spongy soil.

On the flatbed were over 40 full or semi-full barrels in various conditions. Some were solid, others were dented, rusted or in various states of decay. Almost all of them were wrapped with an orange stripe.

"At the time, I didn't think much of it," White told CBC News. "I just did the task and it wasn't until some time later that it really, really hit home to me."

Very few words were exchanged between White, the truck driver and the operator of the excavator. The barrels were dumped into the pit and covered over.

What Al White said he witnessed that morning three decades back was the burial of leftover Agent Orange, the notorious chemical defoliant linked to various types of cancer that was used in secret spraying experiments by the U.S. at the Gagetown military base in New Brunswick — something which would blow up into a major public policy issue 20 years later.


An eyewitness account


​White said he was told at the time what the barrels contained. Experts and activists who have followed the case — and who fought the federal government for compensation for military personnel and civilians affected by defoliant spraying at Gagetown — said White's statement is the first eyewitness account they've heard of the base disposing of stocks of Agent Orange.

"This is quite an interesting development from my perspective," said Wayne Dwernychuk, a expert who spent over 15 years studying Agent Orange contamination and its effects on combatants during the war in Vietnam.

Much of the public controversy in New Brunswick over a dozen years ago related to the secret spraying program. Agent Orange was sprayed at CFB Gagetown in 1966 and 1967 by the U.S. military, with permission from Canada.

It's now known that exposure can lead to skin disorders, liver problems and certain types of cancers.

The Canadian government set aside almost $100 million in 2007 for Canadians harmed by defoliants at the base. In 2011, Ottawa also reversed a decision to reject compensation for dozens of soldiers and their families exposed to the defoliant who later became ill.

What makes White's account remarkable, Dwernychuk said, is that it's the first hint of an answer to a nagging question about the Gagetown spraying program: do we know what happened to all of the leftover defoliant?


Al White in uniform in the mid-1980s. "I just felt ... enough about hiding stuff. Bring it out into the public." (Submitted photo)
There are references to disposal in some of the public reports on the program — in both an independent engineering report and the public health study conducted by Dr. Dennis Furlong, which cites one instance of empty barrels being dug up near what is known as the Shirley Road dump.
White said that is roughly the area where he witnessed the burial.

There are, however, significant discrepancies between the Department of National Defence's timeline and White's account of the burial.

At least 10 sites on the base were the subject of study — and the department said it found barrels at only one.

White said he is willing to show defence officials where he saw the barrels buried; CBC News asked to accompany him. National Defence refused to allow access to the base and a spokesman said the issue has been studied exhaustively.
"DND/CAF has done extensive research into the use and testing of herbicides at CFB Gagetown and has left no stone unturned," said Daniel LeBouthillier.

LeBouthillier pointed to independent research conducted by Jacques Whitford Engineering and the community outreach the department did between 2005 and 2007.

"The Department of National Defence has been open and transparent about its work regarding this file and the science indicates that the base is safe today."

LeBouthillier did, however, invite White to contact the department directly.

Dwernychuk said the federal government needs to investigate further.

"It behooves whoever is in charge of the area, the ministry of defence, to find out what is actually in that particular region, particularly if there is a witness to the burying," he said.

The department claims it conducted remediation at the site where it found barrels. Dwernychuk said it should still look at taking deep core samples at that site, given that a brook runs through the area.

Rumours of buried toxins


Both he and Carol Brown Parker, of the Agent Orange Association of Canada — which still lobbies for more disclosure on the Agent Orange program and its aftermath — said they are amazed that White kept silent all these years.

The rumour that barrels of the defoliant had been secretly buried on the base has been rife in nearby communities for decades.

"I absolutely believe Al," said Brown-Parker, who recalled hearing as a child her teachers talking about the late night transport of barrels through the area. "It was well known they did that, but everybody kept quiet."

White said he recently lost three friends — all former soldiers — to cancer. They all suffered lingering, painful deaths, he said.

"I just felt ... enough about hiding stuff. Bring it out into the public that this did occur," White said. "Perhaps I should have brought it forth years ago after I was released from the military and I didn't, and I'm probably wrong for not doing that."

He said he would like clear, definitive answers from National Defence about the site "so that people can be at rest."

Dwernychuk said it's a bitter disappointment to hear now about what White said he saw decades past, given that he didn't come forward when the battle for recognition and federal compensation for those exposed to Agent Orange at Gagetown was being fought a dozen years ago.

"I would speculate that the government would have taken it more seriously if he had come forward earlier," he said.

"There is always going to be the question of, 'Why did you wait so long?'"

About the Author


Murray Brewster
Defence and security
Murray Brewster is senior defence writer for CBC News, based in Ottawa. He has covered the Canadian military and foreign policy from Parliament Hill for over a decade. Among other assignments, he spent a total of 15 months on the ground covering the Afghan war for The Canadian Press. Prior to that, he covered defence issues and politics for CP in Nova Scotia for 11 years and was bureau chief for Standard Broadcast News in Ottawa.

Trump blasts 'spoiled' Canada and Mexico over NAFTA talks

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/trump-auto-workers-1.4674280


White House launches investigation to determine if auto imports have hurt U.S. national security



2567 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


Richard Sharp 
Richard Sharp
"Trump blasts Canada..." blares the headline. "Canada has been very difficult to deal with" is what Trump actually told reporters.

Big difference.


Michael Murphy
Michael Murphy
@William Ben It's not Trudeau's job to give in to Trump, we didn't elect him to do that, despite Harper's advice to do just that

Play hardball

Trump said the other day there was no deal, now he's saying one is close, good news coming soon

Trudeau was right, what's the problem?


David Amos
David Amos
@Michael Murphy "Play hardball" ???

Methinks that you and everybody know that I play hardball all day long N'esy Pas?

Anyone can Google

Trump NAFTA FATCA Amos

and call his his cell to ask the POTUS lawyer Mr Cohen if I am joking


Fred Rickert
Fred Rickert
@Jim Oxener

Does anybody know what's going on with Trump? Does Trump even know?

David Amos
David Amos
@Fred Rickert Methinks you should have read my comment posted above N'esy Pas?


Eric  V. Zepplin   
Eric V. Zepplin
more 'dribble" coming from the mouth that roared , if the Yanks don't have their way they'll argue the whole time till they get their way , it is afterall the American way , just you remember that when it comes to June 12th summit meeting with Kim ,NFTA is just a side show


David Amos
David Amos
@Eric V. Zepplin Methinks its High Time that Superman in pursuit of Truth Justice and the American Way made an appearance in the Oval Office and read the nasty Yankee Mr. Trump and his cohorts the riot act N'esy Pas?


Maria Stellato 
Brent Grywinski
So I guess Trump expects Canada and Mexico to just roll over and agree to anything he demands? Uh, no! The problem is Trump has never had to compromise on anything in his life. Sorry, Donald, this is the real world. Reality sometimes stinks.


Maria Stellato
Maria Stellato
@Brent Grywinski His success proves he is in the real world and not living in a basement.

Michael Murphy
Michael Murphy
@Maria Stellato His $300m inheritance?

yeah we all got that, only he succeeded


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Carson Brook

The CIA and the rest of the Deep State would have preferred Hillary who was so bloodthirsty she joked about Gaddafi's gruesome, pre-arranged murder: "We came, we saw, he's dead."

Trump is way too unpredictable for these folks but they appear to be at least in truces, except for Mueller.


David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp True


David Amos
David Amos
@Mitchell Irwin Methinks that Trump ain't had much luck draining the swamp either N'esy Pas?

Margaret Bricknell
Margaret Bricknell
@David Amos
Sorry- I have to block you. Can't take the 'n'esy pas' any more.


David Amos
David Amos
@Margaret Bricknell So you are the one I complain of to CBC N'esy Pas?


Chris Messer 
Chris Messer
Just like he won with China. This guy's hot air has no end, please US vote him out in 2 years


David Amos
David Amos
@Andrew Clarkson The Donald" said

"NAFTA is very difficult. Mexico has been very difficult to deal with. Canada has been very difficult to deal with … but I will tell you that in the end we win," Trump told reporters at the White House. "We will win, and we'll win big."

Methinks its high time that Trudeau "The Younger" take the Yankee's hint and pick up his toys and come home. N'esy Pas?


Rick Wier
Rick Wier
@David Amos Yankee go home


David Amos
David Amos
@Rick Wier "Yankee go home" ???

Methinks you have a little studying to do N'esy Pas?

 
Karen King
Karen King
@David Amos

what's with the N'esy Pas bud, making fun of the French?? Or you just got it wrong and refuse to fix it?


Oliver Watler 
Oliver Watler
Canada has been very difficult to deal with?? If you can't get along with Canada then there's something wrong with you.


David Amos
David Amos
@Oliver Watler Methinks there no need to make a deal with a crooked Yankee who will go back on his word in a heartbeat N'esy Pas?


Mark Tyson 
Mark Tyson
Canada has been taking advantage ? What a buffon .


David Amos
David Amos
@Mark Tyson "Canada has been taking advantage ? What a buffon ."

Methinks most folks know that Trump has quite likely never even read NAFTA or FATCA N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Fred Rickert So you say but it got a rise out you N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Fred Rickert What say you quit worrying about my expressions and simply Google the following?

Trump NAFTA FATCA Amos

Emmi Ward
Content disabled.
Emmi Ward
@David Amos thank you for your email this is an automated response


David Amos
David Amos
@Emmi Ward "thank you for your email this is an automated response"

Methinks you should ask Minister Bill Morneau and Mean Mikey Cohen about my lawsuit like I did N'esy Pas?


Matt Bruce 
Matt Bruce
Dear Donald: get bent.


David Amos
David Amos
@Matt Bruce Methinks he is already bent If he gets bent again maybe it will straighten him out N'esy Pas?


George Abbott 
George Abbott
Like I said from the start, these talks from the onset was doomed, the Canadian negotiating team should do the right thing and withdraw from the talks and come back home to Canada. We don't need to kowtow to any bully. We are a sovereign country with values, pride and negotiate in good faith. This fiasco has been a waste of Canadian taxpayers money. Wishful thinking on our part but it was futile.


David Amos
David Amos
@George Abbott "the Canadian negotiating team should do the right thing and withdraw from the talks and come back home to Canada."

YUP


Donald Patrick
Donald Patrick
@David Amos Sure, and watch a couple hundred thousand auto industry jobs disappear. great strategy!!

David Amos
David Amos
@Donald Patrick Methinks there was a lot more folks working within the aforesaid industry BEFORE NAFTA N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos After all this is a comment of mine that you just buried within another thread N'esy Pas?

"Play hardball" ???

Methinks that you and everybody know that I play hardball all day long N'esy Pas?

Anyone can Google

Trump NAFTA FATCA Amos

and call his his cell to ask the POTUS lawyer Mr Cohen if I am joking

  
Donald Patrick
George Kapotto
Do you suppose Dumold understands that saying, "We will keep pushing until we get a one sided deal that is only good for the USA" is kind of self-defeating?


David Amos
David Amos
@George Kapotto Nope


Andrew McLaren 
Andrew McLaren
Trump is not arguing from an advantageous position. Under his Presidency, the USA is becoming an international outcast, certainly in the context of Trade negotiations, where he has left American representatives on constant alert, scrambled backtracking, and "he means something completely different this afternoon" announcements, usually. Greatness ! ! ! for POTUS 45, is essentially a foghorn of guess-my-bluff.


David Amos
David Amos
@Andrew McLaren "POTUS 45, is essentially a foghorn of guess-my-bluff."

Methinks there is no need to guess if we already know he is bluffing N'esy Pas?


Dan Chanos
John Thompson
I have no problem with a leader of a country to try to position himself in a better light when it comes to negotiating trade agreements. That said, for Trump to say mexico and Canada have been difficult is an absolute fallacy. He continues to demonstrate his loose interpretation of the facts...


Martin Oram
Martin Oram
@John Thompson

He continues to demonstrate his loose interpretation of Reality.

David Amos
David Amos
@John Thompson Methinks its a fact that 30 years ago the liberals like Trump were against NAFTA N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/2653709009

October 25, 1988

An invigorated John Turner takes on Brian Mulroney over his controversial free trade deal with the U.S.

David Amos
David Amos
@Martin Oram Methinks its a strange Reality that 30 years later that the liberals would enlist Mulroney to do their bidding in Washington N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/1149921347876

January 30, 2018

Former prime minister Brian Mulroney tells a U.S. Senate committee that a renegotiated NAFTA must be good for all partners, not just perfect for one.



Trump blasts 'spoiled' Canada and Mexico over NAFTA talks

White House launches investigation to determine if auto imports have hurt U.S. national security


U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media before departing the White House for a trip to New York on Wednesday. (Carlos Barria/Reuters)


U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday railed against Mexico and Canada's efforts in renegotiating the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), saying both neighbours have been "very difficult."

"NAFTA is very difficult. Mexico has been very difficult to deal with. Canada has been very difficult to deal with … but I will tell you that in the end we win," Trump told reporters at the White House. "We will win, and we'll win big.

"We'll get along with Mexico, we'll get along with Canada. But I will tell you, they have been very difficult to deal with.  They're very spoiled — because nobody has done this. But I will tell you that what they ask for is not fair."


Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland told reporters in Ottawa Wednesday that progress was being made on the deal and that she would continue to stand up for Canada's interests at the table.

"Let me be very clear, first and foremost with Canadians, that the government of Canada, the prime minister and I personally will always be absolutely resolute in our defence of the Canadian national interest, all the time, and very particularly during these NAFTA negotiations," she said.

"I have described Canada's position, I think at some length, and people can judge which adjectives they choose to apply to that position," Freeland said when asked about Trump's comments about Canada.



Later in the day, the U.S. Commerce Department launched a national security investigation into auto imports and whether they threaten the U.S. industry's health and ability to develop new technologies.

The probe could lead to new U.S. tariffs — similar to those imposed on imported steel and aluminum in March — and appeared to follow up on a remark Trump made on Twitter on Wednesday, when he promised "big news" for the auto sector.
The White House declined to comment, and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative referred queries to the White House.

Automakers scrambled after the tweet to get details. Some of them speculated that Trump could be referring to trade with the European Union.

In a meeting earlier this month with major automakers, Trump threatened to impose tariffs of 20 or 25 per cent on EU-built vehicles, according to three people briefed on the talks.

On Wednesday evening, the White House issued a statement saying U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross was initiating an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to determine "whether imports of automobiles and automotive parts threaten to impair" U.S. national security.

"There is evidence suggesting that, for decades, imports from abroad have eroded our domestic auto industry," said Secretary Ross in a statement.

The investigation will look at the impact of imports of not just automobiles and parts, but SUVs and light trucks as well.

Section 232 was also used to slap tariffs on steel and aluminum imports earlier this year. The notice did not single out any country or automotive brand as a target.



Trump has repeatedly criticized the large trade imbalance on autos between the United States and the EU. In March, he threatened in a tweet to "simply apply a Tax on their Cars which freely pour into the U.S."

The United States imposes a 2.5 per cent tariff on cars assembled in Europe and a 25 per cent tariff on European-built vans and pickup trucks. Europe imposes a 10 per cent tariff on U.S.-built cars.
Auto trade has been a big sticking point in talks between the United States, Mexico and Canada as they try to update NAFTA.

The United States and Mexico have been deadlocked over U.S. demands for wage increases in the auto sector and for a boost in North American content in cars. Last week, the top U.S. trade official said the three countries were "nowhere close to a deal."
At the same time, Washington and South Korea are working to finalize language in an updated U.S.-Korean Free Trade Agreement.

Under an agreement in principle, South Korea agreed to an extension of a 25 per cent U.S. tariff on pickup trucks for another 20 years until 2041. These were due to begin phasing out in 2019, causing concerns that South Korea would soon begin exporting pickup trucks to the United States.

Trump hinted at the possibility of "good news" on trade with South Korea during a meeting on Tuesday with South Korean President Moon Jae-in.

"We will have some pretty good news, I think, on trade," he told reporters as the two leaders sat down.

Attn Bruce McCulloch and Scott Lockhart I just called Perhaps you fellas should ask the RCMP or the Premier or Petey Baby MacKay if I am a Liar or Not?

$
0
0
---------- Original message ----------
From: Immigration Minister <ImmigrationMinister@novascotia.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 15:07:33 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Bruce McCulloch and Scott Lockhart I
just called Perhaps you fellas should ask the RCMP or the Premier or
Petey Baby MacKay if I am a Liar or Not?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for your message to the Nova Scotia Office of Immigration.

This is an automatic confirmation your email has been received.

Warmest regards,
Minister’s Correspondence Unit


---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 15:07:42 +0000
Subject: RE: Attn Bruce McCulloch and Scott Lockhart I just called
Perhaps you fellas should ask the RCMP or the Premier or Petey Baby
MacKay if I am a Liar or Not?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 11:07:27 -0400
Subject: Attn Bruce McCulloch and Scott Lockhart I just called Perhaps
you fellas should ask the RCMP or the Premier or Petey Baby MacKay if
I am a Liar or Not?
To: ToryRushton2018@gmail.com, news@sixrivers.ca, bill@sixrivers.ca,
scottlockhart@bellaliant.net, bruce@mccenergy.ca,
gpns@greenpartyns.ca, tt@cs.dal.ca, Michael.Gorman@cbc.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, "Andy.Fillmore"
<Andy.Fillmore@parl.gc.ca>, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com,
moraig@nsndp.ca, larryduchesne@nsndp.ca, davidwheeler@nsndp.ca,
"David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
ImmigrationMinister@novascotia.ca, bucci.paul@brunswicknews.com,
rickard.mark@brunswicknews.com, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
ttracy <ttracy@clc-ctc.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>
Cc: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, 15 <15@atlanticaparty.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLK31BCqepQ&t=206s

Me,Myself and I
David Amos
Published on Oct 27, 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
Campaign, Rogers TV
Rogers tv
Published on Oct 1, 2015

https://electionsnovascotia.ca/CumberlandSouth2018

Nominated Candidates, to date:
Larry DUCHESNE             Nova Scotia New Democratic Party (NDP)
Scott LOCKHART              Nova Scotia Liberal Party (NSLP)
Bruce W. MCCULLOCH    Green Party of Nova Scotia (GPNS)
Tory RUSHTON                 Progressive Conservative Association of
Nova Scotia (PC)

https://greenpartyns.ca/about/gpns-executive-contacts/

http://greenpartyns.ca/category/media/

Bruce McCulloch to Run in Cumberland South for Green Party of Nova Scotia

May 21, 2018 By gpnsadmin Leave a Comment
Bruce McCulloch, P.Eng, MBA

Bruce McCulloch, an engineer who has long been active in the community
of Parrsboro, will be the Green Party of Nova Scotia candidate in the
Cumberland South by-election.

Bruce is a seasoned professional with a strong knowledge of energy
efficiency. He lived in Parrsboro while his children were growing up.
He served on the Ship’s Company theatre board for 18 years, and was an
active volunteer at Ottawa House museum. He is an investor in the Two
Island Brewery start-up.

“Cumberland South has great, resilient communities, and an excellent
quality of life,” Bruce says. “This, in spite of the struggle to
retain health professionals, and the trend of jobs disappearing and
young people leaving the area.”

Bruce looks forward to discussing how the values of the Green Party
align with the needs of the people of Cumberland South.

Recognizing some of the issues he has seen in the area, Bruce promises
to strengthen supports for seasonal workers and businesses. He aims to
create conditions to allow local businesses to flourish, including
ensuring high speed internet access and global market opportunity. He
wants to see Nova Scotia adopt the British Columbia model for
attracting doctors.

Bruce assures current and retired teachers and health care workers in
Cumberland South that he will strive to ensure a more transparent,
cooperative approach to labour negotiations.

Finally, Bruce notes, “We need to overcome the “turf warfare” between
the Atlantic provinces to see regulatory processes and services become
more streamlined, cost-effective and efficient. We need better ‘free
trade’ between provinces.”

Bruce previously ran in the area in the 2013 election.

PO Box 36044
5665 Spring Garden Road
Halifax NS B3J 3S9
Email: gpns@greenpartyns.ca


Bruce McCulloch, P.Eng. MBA
LEED Green Associate | MCC Energy Strategies
.277 Rutledge Street, Suite 109,
Bedford NS  B4A 4M2
902-471-8665
bruce@mccenergy.ca.

Dr. Thomas Trappenberg
Professor Faculty of Computer Science
Dalhousie University
6050 University Avenue
PO BOX 15000
Halifax, NS B3H 4R2
Email: tt@cs.dal.ca
Phone: 902-494-3087



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 06:44:40 -0600
Subject: Re: The Hearing in the Federal Court on May 24th and the
elections in Antgonish Halifax Armdale and Cumberland South and
Atlantic Party's latest snobby nonsense
To: 15@atlanticaparty.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca, 24@atlanticaparty.ca,
jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca, Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie.com
Cc: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com, moraig@nsndp.ca,
larryduchesne@nsndp.ca, davidwheeler@nsndp.ca,
ImmigrationMinister@novascotia.ca, 14@atlanticaparty.ca,
2@atlanticaparty.ca

Would you like to see a copy of my drivers licence? If so ask Premier
McNeil’s minions in Amherst for it



---------- Original message ----------
From: 15@atlanticaparty.ca
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 09:12:49 -0300
Subject: Re: Good Evening RE Halifax Armdale and Cumberland South Feel
free to  call 902 800 0369
To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
Cc: 24@atlanticaparty.ca, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com

Mr David Amos

Thank you for contacting me.

1) Are you currently a resident and eligible voter in the Cumberland
South electoral district?

2) If you are in Cumberland South and would like to address issues that
concern the scope of the Provincial authority, please provide a short
point form outline of your questions on my own or the Atlantica's Party
policies.

I feel a frustration in your previous communications, however, dealing
with the wrong person will not help you get the issues resolved. If it
is something I can address personally, I will.

Thank you for your understanding

Michael "Thor" Lengies

Atlantica Party for Cumberland South



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice

On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017





APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

http://www.sixrivers.ca/cumberland-south-ndp-ready-for-fight

Cumberland South NDP Ready for Fight

Cumberland South has added another candidate to the list of those who
await a provincial by-election call. The NDP once again named Larry
Duchesne as their candidate at a nomination meeting today in
Springhill.

The event was filled with a star-studded cast, including the Nova
Scotia Leader, Gary Burrill, former national NDP leader Alexa
McDonough, Truro/Bible Hill MLA, Lenore Zann, and a number of former
candidates from around the province.

(Photo - seated L to R: Gary Burrill, Alexa McDonough, standing L to
R: Lenore Zann, and Larry Duchesne)

Duchesne, a former teacher and newspaper reporter, was unopposed for
the nomination. He has carried the banner before in Cumberland South
and elsewhere in Nova Scotia, as well as a three year stint as NDP
leader in Prince Edward Island.

The provincial leader was the keynote speaker this afternoon. Burrill
admitted to certain disappointments in recent elections, but he said
there are defining moments in the world of politics and this
by-election could be one of those moments.

Burrill says Nova Scotians are facing “a moment of regret and remorse”
at the re-election of the McNeil government. He said during the last
election campaign, “Not a single one of us heard a single Liberal
candidate say anything about the abolition of school boards, not one
word.” Burrill added, “They have completely eradicated a whole level
of local/regional democratic government in our province.” He says, “It
was very similar to the Nova Scotia Health Authority where they shut
down all those local voices and created one, super centralized,
Halifax based health authority.” The NDP leader often suggests the
Liberal goal is a “Halifax city state”.

The new candidate was grateful to all those who attended the meeting.
Duchesne suggested “winning is not out of the question at all. When
parties concentrate their resources, it makes a big difference.”

Speaking of the McNeil Liberals, he noted “how Conservative they are,
but they are not progressive.”

Duchesne says Cumberland South needs representation that truly cares
for people. He said, “In Cumberland South we have some of the oldest
and some of the poorest people in the province. If we had a
progressive government we stand to benefit a lot.” He added, “Instead,
from the Liberal Government, we’re getting disempowerment,
depopulation, and joblessness.”

Duchesne says, “When you look at the potential of tidal power, we have
to make sure that control stays as local as possible so the benefits
stay local.”

He also addressed concerns for the environment, geo-thermal potential
in Springhill, further development in farming and forestry. He says,
“Potential turns to reality when you have people working to identify
opportunities and see them through.”

Duchesne is sporting an eye patch to protect a detached retina. He
will soon go in for surgery and hopes there will be no patch during
the election campaign.

The NDP nomination follows earlier nominations by the Conservatives
and the Atlantic Party. In fact, the only party that is not yet ready
for a by-election is the Liberal Party. Premier Stephen McNeil has the
exclusive right to determine when an election call. With that
privilege, he gets to decide when the time is right for his party to
hold a nomination meeting.

Six Rivers News,
P.O. Box 364
Pugwash, NS
B0K 1L0
Phone 902-614-3000 •
email news@sixrivers.ca
General Manager, Bill Martin bill@sixrivers.ca
Reporter, Larry Duchesne 902-686-3735
or larry@sixrivers.ca


Springhill Headquarters is Open

The Coffee is on, the Cookies are out and our Campaign Headquarters is
now open at 69 Main St Springhill NS.
Drop in for a visit, drink some coffee and have a snack. Or If you
want to volunteer, come in anytime.
Ask away with any questions or concerns you may have. Pick up a pin or
door knocker with info. Or get on the sign list.
We are ready to go with the upcoming bi-election.

902-597-TORY (8679)
ToryRushton2018@gmail.com


Call  (902) 597-8200
@ScottLockhartNS
scottlockhart@bellaliant.net
http://www.scottlockhart.ca
Hometown
Springhill, NS
About
As a life long resident of Springhill, I am committed to making sure
Cumberland South’s voice is heard at the Government table. Let’s get
it done.

Cell (902) 297-1500


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 10:38:37 -0400
Subject: Attn Chief Electoral Officer, Richard Temporale I just called
I must ask why are you still holding to my money from the 2006
election?
To: elections@novascotia.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Cumberland South By-election
Cumberland South By-election information will be posted here. Most
recent information will appear at the top of the page. Under the House
of Assembly Act, a writ must be issued by July 24, six months from the
date the vacancy occurred.


Registered Candidates (to date)
(Candidate names will be added as registrations are received)

Tory Rushton           Progressive Conservative Association of Nova Scotia (PC)
Larry Duchesne       Nova Scotia New Democratic Party (NDP)
Scott Lockhart          Nova Scotia Liberal Party (NSLP)

 Contact Elections Nova Scotia
Street Address

 7037 Mumford Road, Suite 6
 Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3L 2J1
Mailing Address

 PO Box 2246
 Halifax, NS.
 B3J 3C8
Telephone

 902-424-8584
 1-800-565-1504 (Toll free)
 902-424-7475 (TTY)
 1-866-774-7074 (Toll Free TTY)
 902-424-6622 (Fax)
Email
elections@novascotia.ca



Cumberland South By-election – Nomination Fee Waived

Media Release - April 18, 2018

Chief Electoral Officer, Richard Temporale, is notifying registered
parties and prospective candidates that, for the upcoming Cumberland
South by-election, the nomination deposit will not be required as part
of the nomination process outlined in Section 65(2)(b) of the Act.

Under Section 5(r) of the Act, the Chief Electoral Officer may modify
any provision of this Act to permit its use at a by-election.

Following the 40th Provincial General Election, several recommended
changes to the Elections Act were made in Volume II: Report on the
Conduct of the May 30, 2017 Provincial General Election and
Recommendations for Legislative Change, dated December 2017.

The recommendation that the $200 candidate nomination deposit
requirement be removed received unanimous support from the members of
the Election Commission who represent the three parties with two or
more elected members in the House of Assembly.

The following is an excerpt from Volume II:


Candidate Deposits

On October 25, 2017, the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta rendered
its decision in Szuchewycz v. Canada (Attorney General), stating that
the $1,000 deposit requirement for prospective candidates in federal
elections infringes on section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms, which provides that: “Every citizen of Canada has the right
to vote in an election of members of the House of Commons or of a
legislative assembly and to be qualified for membership therein.” The
CEO believes that this decision applies to Nova Scotia and invalidates
Section 65 or the Elections Act and, as a result, prospective
candidates will no longer be required to deposit $200 as part of their
nomination requirements.

Recommendation 9: The Chief Electoral Officer recommends that the
candidate’s nomination deposit requirement be removed from the
legislation.


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/05/yo-matt-decourcey-while-you-are.html

Wednesday, 16 May 2018

Yo Matt DeCourcey while you are explaining things to John Brassard why
not explain Federal Court File No T-1557-15 as well?

Ontario NDP under fire for candidate's Hitler-themed social media post

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/tasleem-riaz-andrea-horwath-ndp-facebook-1.4677603


Ontario NDP under fire for candidate's Hitler-themed social media post

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath offered words of support for candidate in Scarborough-Agincourt

CBC News· Posted: May 25, 2018 11:12 AM ET


1210 Comments


Roy Stephenson 
Roy Stephenson
Newsflash!!! Horwath is toast as the Tories have a video of one of her candidates spitting on the sidewalk fifteen years ago. Way worse than Ford giving out bogus memberships to backstab his own Christine Elliot! Oh the humanity!


David Amos
David Amos 
@Roy Stephenson Methinks this is just another tempest in a teapot but its fun to watch N'esy Pas


Stephen George 
Stephen George
PCs are getting really desperate now.


David Amos
David Amos
@Stephen George "PCs are getting really desperate now."

Methinks they are all in the same boat but I am enjoying the circus as should we all N'esy Pas?

Pat Kenny
Pat Kenny
@David Amos Boat? Ford had a yacht and shipwrecked it. Wynne's canoe sprung leaks. Horwath is just enjoying her leisurely inner tube ride. She made Ford look foolish at the debates just by letting him talk.

David Amos
David Amos
@Pat Kenny True but Ford's yacht could come of the rocks yet. Methinks Wynne's record does not speak well of her old canoe and the winds of change do favour Horwath's inner tube ride but history could pot it into quite a spin like something going down a drain so to speak if folks look to NDP's history in Ontario Furthermore what is going on in BC and Alberta right now ain't helping people to be impressed with the NDP N'esy Pas?

Stephen George
Stephen George
@David Amos

Actually Notley and the NDP are doing quite well in Alberta.
N'cest pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Stephen George Methinks you should have a long talk with Jason Kenney's crowd of supporters N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Stephen George If the NDP want some food for thought they should Google the following ASAP N'esy Pas?

David Raymond Amos Christine Elliott

Stephen George
Stephen George
@David Amos

Why would I ever want to discuss anything with someone who supports that twit?


David Amos
David Amos
@Stephen George Methinks I have far better reason to dislike that twit that you do if you doubt me you should Google the following first N'esy Pas?

David Raymond Amos Jason Kenney

Stephen George
Stephen George
@David Amos

I don't really care to enter a dialogue with someone who supports that twit. N'cest pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Stephen George Methinks your rattled and being rather redundant now N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos Methinks everybody in the know knows the result I am hoping for If you don't too bad s sad that you don't know how to surf the Internet before you pounce on a rather fierce political animal N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos Methinks the link below provides a very good example as to why I ran against all political parties five times thus far N'esy Pas?

Read the comment section

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276

Then Google

Fundy Royal Debate


Angela Zione 
Angela Zione
If howling about a Facebook meme from 2013 is the best the PCs can come up with, they've already lost this election.


David Amos
David Amos
@Angela Zione It is pretty comical


Al Freeman 
Al Freeman
When Doug Ford was caught on audio fudging the sales of Conservative memberships he responded by saying "that was in 2016". This out-of-context allegation allegedly occurred in 2013. Why aren't the Conservatives applying the same standard?


John Gerrits
John Gerrits
@Al Freeman Why?...because anyone from any party would do the same.


David Amos
David Amos
@John Gerrits True


Ron Moffatt 
Ron Moffatt
this is nothing more than a desperate act by a desperate party who is managed once again to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.Love it!Wise choice PC's picking Doug Ford to lead you to defeat.


David Amos
David Amos
@Ron Moffatt Methinks the Yankee have a pretty good expression for such days as this "It ain't over til the Fat Lady sings" N'esy Pas?


 Al Freeman 
Chris Shield
Yesterday, Drug Ford said that the Liberals were digging up old news right before the election in order to change the script.
Today, the PC party releases an NDP tweet from 2013 about Hitler.
All I can do is roll my eyes......


David Amos
David Amos
@Chris Shield oh come on now Methinks this news must have been worth at least one little chuckle N'esy Pas?


Mike Martin
Mike Martin
@David Amos
What does "N'esy Pas" mean by the way?

David Amos
David Amos @Mike Martin Thanks for asking.

Way back in 2006 I was dicing with a rather well known nasty French blogger in New Brunswick within his own blog 2 years after I gave him a free computer. He is now CTV and CBC's favourite blogger in the Maritimes. When I busted Chucky in front of his fans, he blocked me. However his fan base demanded that he unblock me so they could watch the circus between he and I . He then demanded that I be nice so I typed N'esy Pas? and asked him if that was nice enough for him. Ever since I have used it as my signature to tease him and his pals in CBC. True story.


JOHN MCTAGGART 
JOHN MCTAGGART
Mud slinging defines the slinger as much, if not more, than the target!


David Amos
David Amos
@JOHN MCTAGGART I agree


Al Freeman 
Greg Anderson
Comical... 20 yrs ago you posted a pic of a dog. Meanwhile Doug is on audio getting bogus memberships. Sigh... politics is a dirty game.


David Amos
David Amos
@Michael Murphy "Right wingers are hilarious"

Methinks you should know that left wingers are every bit as comical N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Greg Anderson "Sigh... politics is a dirty game"

Oh So True Methinks Ford can win of without a platform on one issue alone Getting rid of Carbon Tax is his hot ticket to a mandate N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos "Sigh... politics is a dirty game"

Methinks it should be fairly obvious to many why the second most like thread just went "Poof" N'esy Pas?


Dale Sullivan 
Dale Sullivan
Digging, digging. Going back 5 years to try and find dirt. The Conservative way. Are they getting worried?


Michele McLean
Michele McLean
@Dale Sullivan

On the contrary - if the Cons are this desperate, things in Ontario are really looking up!

David Amos
David Amos
@Michele McLean How so?


Charlize Croft 
Charlize Croft
Say goodbye to investment in Ontario if the NDP get in, and hello to the carbon tax.


David Amos
David Amos
@Charlize Croft I concur

Pat Kenny 
Pat Kenny
I got robocalled twice by Ford's people using my etr407 data! But these guys think I care what one riding candidate may have said years ago??? I guess Mike Harris knew what he was doing when he gave away the 407 to Tory friends.


Roy Stephenson
Roy Stephenson
@Pat Kenny I got asked if I want to make a donation. lol...sure I said, I love it when thiefs steal my data and then bug me on the phone. Bye Ford.

David Amos
David Amos
@Roy Stephenson Ford and his minions don't write or call me back Methinks they don't love me anymore than the NDP, the Liberals or the Green Meanies do N'esy Pas?



Ontario NDP under fire for candidate's Hitler-themed social media post

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath offered words of support for candidate in Scarborough-Agincourt

CBC News· Posted: May 25, 2018 11:12 AM ET


Ontario NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said her team would probe allegations that a candidate in Scarborough-Agincourt made controversial social media posts. (Chris Young/Canadian Press)



Ontario's Progressive Conservatives are calling on NDP Leader Andrea Horwath to part ways with a candidate in Toronto who shared an Adolf Hitler meme on social media several years ago.

At a morning news conference, two PC candidates, Todd Smith and Gila Martow, presented what they say is evidence of anti-Semitism "festering" in the NDP.

The pair provided a printout of an October 2013 social media meme shared by the NDP candidate in Scarborough–Agincourt, Tasleem Riaz.

The Facebook post features a quote that is commonly attributed to Hitler overlaid over a photo of the tyrannical despot giving a Nazi salute to a gathered crowd. A title above the image reads, "The Ruler said about Rule."
The phrase below it — "If you don't like a rule ... just follow it ... reach on the top ... and change the rule," is attributed to Hitler, though there's no direct historical evidence the Nazi dictator ever uttered it.

Smith called the post the "most serious example of anti-Semitism we've seen in Ontario politics for a long, long time" and criticized Horwath for what he characterized as a laissez faire approach to dealing with candidates who express controversial views.

"You don't post this kind of thing by accident. You don't openly push Nazi messages on social media by mistake," Martow said.

Smith and Martow also provided a screen grab of a April 2011 post allegedly written by Riaz, taking aim at the federal Liberals' and Tories' support for the war in Afghanistan. Riaz said the parties supported troops who "slaughter innocent men, women and children."

In a statement, Riaz said she is "horrified that an inappropriate meme was on my Facebook page" and that she cannot understand how it happened.

"I don't recall sharing it in 2013 — and at no point in my life would I have done so intentionally," she continued.

"I am an interfaith advocate, and I have devoted my life to interfaith religious tolerance and freedom. I work closely with the Jewish, Hindu, Christian, Sikh and Muslim communities in my neighbourhood. In every way, I find Hitler, the hate he spewed, and the genocide he committed to be abhorrent."

PCs in 'glass house,' Horwath says


During a campaign stop on Friday morning, Horwath said she was unaware of the details of the post and would have her staff investigate the allegations. She followed up, however, with a statement of support for Riaz.

"Let me be pretty clear about our candidate. I've known Tasleem for some time now. This woman is an activist in the inter-faith community … I find it pretty unbelievable that she would be in any way implicated in anything that's at all anti-Semitic," Horwath told reporters.

She added that PC Leader Doug Ford and his team "live in a little bit of a glass house."

"This is coming from a party whose leader is accused of cheating in nomination meetings, cheating in the democratic process," Horwath said, alluding to allegations that Ford improperly bought party memberships to support his preferred candidate in Etobicoke Centre.

Shortly after Horwath spoke, Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne said on Twitter, "Andrea Horwath needs to be clearer in her condemnation of this post by her candidate.

"No one in Ontario can or should attempt to draw inspiration from the words of Adolf Hitler. Canadian soldiers have earned and deserve our thanks."

The social media footprints of NDP candidates have come under increasing scrutiny from the PCs on the campaign trail in recent weeks. Earlier this week, Horwath was forced to fend off criticism of the NDP candidate in Mississauga Centre, Laura Kaminker, who once posted online that she refuses to wear a poppy around Remembrance Day.
The PCs are not immune to ghosts of social media past, however.

Andrew Lawton, the Tory candidate in London West, faced pressure to resign after a series of posts — alternately described by critics as homophobic, misogynistic and Islamophobic — resurfaced online. Lawton has repeatedly attributed the posts to mental illness.

Despite calls for him to intervene, Ford has allowed Lawton to continue on the campaign trail.
Pressed by reporters to explain the apparent contradiction, Smith said the difference is how the PCs have chosen to handle controversial comments from candidates.

"Our candidates have apologized and addressed comments that were made. The NDP continue to shrug them off, and their leader, Andrea Horwath, continues to almost laugh off these types of comments that were made in the past," said Smith.

"True leadership is actually addressing these situations as real problems and answering the questions that need to be asked about this party."
 

Loonie sinks to two-week low: Is this the start of another big drop?

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/loonie-canadian-dollar-currency-1.4677993


Loonie sinks to two-week low: Is this the start of another big drop?

The pressures facing the Canadian dollar could intensify further next week, according to analysts

Rajeshni Naidu-Ghelani· CBC News· Posted: May 26, 2018 4:00 AM ET



499 Comments 
Commenting is now closed for this story.



Earl Sargent 
Earl Sargent
If only we still had Harper. Guess we are getting what was voted for.


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Earl Sargent

Earl, we kicked Harper to the curb for a hundred reasons, all of which are still valid. He was the worst PM since WW II in terms of economic, employment and export growth, FPT, foreign and FNs relations and on and on. In terms of character, he had none.

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Methinks you clever liberals should finally Google the following N'esy Pas?

Trump NAFTA FATCA Amos


Earl Sargent
Earl Sargent
@Richard Sharp You stories are always entertaining Richard. But the truth just wrecks your stories every single time. Have you thought about writing fiction novels?

  
Earl Sargent
Earl Sargent
The Loonie will also drop much farther if another disastrous leftie government gets in , in Ontario. Canadians will get what they voted for. Third world status.


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Earl Sargent

How does Premier Horwath sound, Earl. Maybe you should move south for a few years. Trump land appears to suit you.

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Oh My My

Earl Sargent
Earl Sargent
@Richard Sharp As a liberal cheerleader that must really have been hard to write. Your in third and dropping like a brick. Expect the same in 2019.


Carl Street 
Carl Street
Liberal times are definitely tough times ...


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Carl Street

What part of the highest economic growth in the G7 bothers you, Carl? Is it the lowest unemployment rate in decades that upsets you? Or are you just slinging unfounded mud?

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp LOL


Brian Robertson 
Brian Robertson
How much longer is Trudeau going to cling to his fantasies, until reality forces him to alter Canada's trajectory to the bottom?
His international gifts of our money; the open borders to anyone that can walk here; the continuing deficits; the growing debts; the stifled economic growth and now increasing interest rates taking an even bigger bite out of revenues. This simply cannot continue.


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Brian Robertson

The Libs' spending on international aid is no more than Harper. Our handling of refugees at the border is in accordance with our international obligations and the law. The deficits are lower than projected and the lowest unemployment rate in decades tells reasonable people they are working. Economic growth is the highest among the G7. Interest rate increases are minimal in terms of the federal government's books.

So, you are zero for seven Brian. Can't do much worse than that.

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Stop it My belly hurts from laughing

Darren MacDonald
Darren MacDonald
@David Amos Don't even say that, a belly tax might be next.



Nick Cash 
Nick Cash
An NDP government in Ontario will send it much lower. $.60


David Amos
David Amos
@Nick Cash Perhaps



Loonie sinks to two-week low: Is this the start of another big drop?

The pressures facing the Canadian dollar could intensify further next week, according to analysts

Rajeshni Naidu-Ghelani· CBC News· Posted: May 26, 2018 4:00 AM ET


The headwinds facing the loonie are being driven by political events such as NAFTA talks and the uncertainty around Canada's exemption from the U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs that could be renewed next week. (Jonathan Hayward/The Canadian Press)



The Canadian dollar fell to a two-week low against the U.S. dollar on Friday as lower oil prices and global trade tensions continue to weigh on the currency.

The loonie is already down more than three per cent this year and was at 77.11 cents US on Friday.

But analysts say the risks facing the Canadian dollar could intensify further next week, pushing the currency closer to a "tipping point."

Bipan Rai, head of North American foreign exchange strategy at CIBC Capital Markets, said that downside risks for the loonie are being driven by political events such as NAFTA talks and the uncertainty around Canada's exemption from the U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs that could be renewed next week.

"We're monitoring [Canadian dollar] price behaviour closely now, but the tipping point will come if markets chase the Canadian dollar-U.S. dollar cross below the 76.40 to 77.00 [cent] range," he said.

Canada's exclusion from the Trump administration's hefty tariffs on steel and aluminum is set to expire next week on June 1, with U.S. officials hinting this week that tariffs could be imposed if the U.S. does not get a better NAFTA deal as its deadline also looms.
In addition that, the U.S. launched an investigation this week into whether vehicles imported from Canada and other countries posed a security threat.

The investigation allows the world's biggest economy to impose tariffs if national security is under threat.
"I think there is a hefty 'NAFTA discount' being applied to the currency at this point due to concerns that the agreement may lapse," said Shaun Osborne, chief foreign exchange strategist at Scotiabank.

Oil factor?


Meanwhile, U.S. crude oil prices were down for a fourth consecutive day on Friday for a total weekly drop of more than three per cent. The drop came after reports that top producers Saudi Arabia and Russia could boost production later this year, increasing supply in the market.

Because oil is one of Canada's major exports, its price has weighed on the loonie in the past, but the correlation between the two has eased off lately.

However, Mazen Issa, senior foreign exchange strategist at TD Securities, said falling oil prices still represent one less positive working in the Canadian dollar's favour.
He sees the Canadian dollar "on the cusp of an appreciable downleg" and is calling for investors to favour currencies that would benefit from a weaker loonie.

"Naturally, this has us eyeing $1.30 as the next major topside attractor for U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar cross, though a move towards $1.32 should not be ruled out in the coming weeks," he said in a note on Friday. That is an almost two per cent increase in the value of the U.S. dollar against the loonie.

But Scotiabank's Osborne thinks that even if oil prices dropped closer to $65 US a barrel in the near term, the general trend in commodity prices is strong and that will bode well for the Canadian dollar. Oil is currently trading around $67 US.

"Rising commodity prices boost Canadian terms of trade and usually produce positive economic outcomes — rising incomes etc.," he said. "This is the opposite of what occurred in 2015 when oil prices slumped. The terms of trade effect is not fully reflected in the Canadian dollar at this point."

Impact of higher rates


He also thinks that the Bank of Canada's interest rate policy meeting next week will lend support to the loonie as the central bank talks positively about the Canadian economy in preparation to rising interest rates later in the summer.
"Despite the uncertainty over the NAFTA outlook, the Bank of Canada may sound a little more hawkish [in favour of higher interest rates] in next week's policy statement to prepare markets for a late summer tightening," Osborne said. "If it does, the Canadian dollar should rally modestly."

Rai of CIBC agreed that the Canadian economy is performing well and said it likely grew faster than the Bank of Canada's growth forecast of 1.3 per cent in the first quarter of this year.

"We still need to see the national accounts data to confirm this, but that is a step in the right direction for a rate hike in the coming months," he said.
 

No matter what's at stake in final Ontario leaders' debate Phil Simpson is not my friend N'esy Pas??

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/brown-ford-pc-ontario-1.4681338


Patrick Brown says he's not to blame for Doug Ford's campaign woes

'This is the Progressive Conservatives' election to lose,' the former Ontario PC leader told CBC News

Hannah Thibedeau, Christina Romualdo· CBC News· Posted: May 28, 2018 7:04 PM ET


185 Comments

  
Lee Hall
Anna Lyle
Patrick Brown is right. Doug Ford's undoing is no one's fault but his own.


David Amos
David Amos
@Anna Lyle Trust that I am no fan of Doug Ford However the truth this is the title of a blog that I kept adding more emails to Anyone can Google some of the words to find it

Friday, 19 January 2018
Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial election?




http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/what-s-at-stake-in-final-ontario-leaders-debate-1.4676911


What's at stake in final Ontario leaders' debate?

In the 3 weeks since the first televised debate, the campaign has changed dramatically



Joanne Chianello· CBC News· Posted: May 27, 2018 4:00 AM ET



3503 Comments 
Commenting is now closed for this story.



 Robin Blair 
Robin Blair
I'll bet Dougie is sweating tonight!"
 

David Amos
David Amos
@Robin Blair Methinks many folks would bet against you N'esy Pas?


Dale Prokop 
Dale Prokop
The PC's shot themselves in the head with Ford.


Johny Ng
Johny Ng
@Dale Prokop Caroline and Christine split the vote. The delegates clearly showed enthusiasm for both. Now Ford is the leader and as such presents a clear and definite improvement over Horvath or
Wynn spend and tax approach



David Amos
David Amos
@Johny Ng YUP


Robin Blair
Robin Blair
@Dale Prokop

The Man With No Plan!

But don't worry, anti-Ford posts are being systematically flagged and removed today.


David Amos
David Amos
@Robin Blair Methinks that its not rocket science to understand why certain folks are blocked no matter what side of the political fence they are sitting on Your most liked Leftie thread went "Poof" because of my reply N'esy Pas?

 
William Carver
William Carver
@Robin Blair

Odd, I've seen many anti-Ford comments.

As a 10 year veteran of this section, and quite familiar with the colour of censor, and being quite familiar with your posts, I suspect this is just another ploy of yours to denigrate opposition.

David Amos
David Amos
@William Carver Nope it happened t him at least once As I said methinks it was because of my reply N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@William Carver Methinks you should trust that I have been watching very closely save everything I did for non partisan political reasons of my own N'esy Pas?


William Carver
William Carver
@David Amos

CBC is participating in a campaign against pro PC supporters.


David Amos
David Amos
@William Carver Methinks everybody knows that but I bet you don't know why has CBC been acting against me since 2002 N'esy Pas?

 Chris Maurier 
Chris Maurier
Ford platform = Feed the rich ,Starve the poor.


David Amos
David Amos
@ Chris Maurier Methinks Ford needs no platform whatsoever just keep promising No Carbon Tax and allow the Fake Left to spit the vote N'esy Pas?

Andy Davis
Andy Davis
@David Amos It's n'est pas. There fixed that for you... cons aren't the brightest bulbs in the room

 
Jack Christian
Jack Christian
@David Amos Sure wish you'd grow up and knock off with the n'esy pas.

David Amos
David Amos
@Jack Christian Methinks you need to dream on Jacky Boy No doubt I am old enough to be your daddy N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Jack Christian A Little Deja Vu from this thread that has since went "Poof"

Andy Davis
@David Amos It's n'est pas. There fixed that for you... cons aren't the brightest bulbs in the room

 
Dennis Regan 
Dennis Regan
Mr. Ford. To get votes, I suggest you tell us "all" about yourself. To what extent did your high school schoolyard sales reach? Are you still super-buddies with your brothers sleazy friends? Would you still vote for Trump if you had a chance to?


David Amos
David Amos
@Dennis Regan "Would you still vote for Trump if you had a chance to?"

Methinks most folks in Canada don't care about Yankee election results between the Donald and Hillary nor should they N'esy Pas?


Phil Simpson
Phil Simpson
@David Amos : Methinks being willfully ignorant of the goings on concerning our neighbour to the south is pure folly. The USA is still the most powerful and influential nation in the western hemisphere, and it is prudent to keep an eye on what may be affecting our nation with every twitch and groan.


David Amos
David Amos
@Phil Simpson Methinks if you truly mean what you say then you should Google the following ASAP N'esy Pas?

Trump NAFTA FATCA Amos


Phil Simpson
Phil Simpson
@David Amos : Methinks you are grinning when you gave me the link to David Raymond Amos. I'll pass on the obvious entertainment value of the blog.
N’est-ce pas, mon ami? Certainement, non?


David Amos
David Amos
@Phil Simpson Nope However Methinks you may enjoy the title of my latest blog N'esy Pas?


Phil Simpson
Phil Simpson
@David Amos : That is a cute bit of bait that you have extended. I am not biting, or even curious to nibble.
No, you are not my friend, as yet, but you that could change as I do not know you.
I am assuredly not your enemy either, as I do not know you.
I hope you are having a wonderful day.
N’est-ce pas, mon ami? Certainement, non?


David Amos
David Amos
@Phil Simpson Methinks Stupid Is As Stupid Does N'esy Pas?

BTW I Tweeted about it as well


Neil Gregory 
Neil Gregory
What is at stake in final Ontario leaders' debate is the political and economic future of Ontario. As I see it, a vote for Wynne is a vote for more of the same old policies and behaviors that have plagued Ontario for the past fifteen years. A vote for Ford and is reformacons will likely result in the same kind of crippling debt Mulroney and Harper inflicted on Canada and the massive cuts to essential government services imposed by Harris. The NDP is the unknown quantity in this election and is the only party without recent baggage.


David Amos
David Amos
@Neil Gregory "The NDP is the unknown quantity in this election and is the only party without recent baggage"

Methinks that you have not read the news about the doings of the NDP in Nova Scotia not all that long ago or what is going on in BC and Alberta right now N'esy Pas?

Neil Gregory
Neil Gregory
@David Amos

OK. Let me amend my statement. How about, "The NDP is the only party without recent baggage in Ontario."

Happy?

Probably not.


Jayme Reid 
Chris Maurier
Doug Ford started his Campaign by claiming he had a proven track record of Governance ..So a one yr. stint of running interference for his brother at city hall and a failed bid for Mayor is a proven track record? ..Of What?


Susanne Armstrong
Susanne Armstrong
@Steven Read You are being very kind. I think the word you are looking for is Ford is a Li ar.

David Amos
David Amos
@Susanne Armstrong Oh My My Please name one professional politician who is not. Methinks the Fake Left is upset that the vote is split N'esy Pas?


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Susanne Armstrong Oh My My I upset CBC

  
Jayme Reid
Francis Culligan
Provincial political experience

Horwarth--15 years as an MPP
Wynne--15 years
Ford--ZERO, but he can run a family bbq and invite folks


Sandy Gillis
Sandy Gillis
@Johny Ng
Like a business? What a terrible idea, government should never be run like a business. A non-profit maybe, but never a business.


David Amos
David Amos
@Sandy Gillis Methinks professional politicians have made government the biggest business of all. However we all know you are no fan of this political animal and his opinions N'esy Pas?


Jayme Reid 
Nigel Marshall
For 44 years, the PCs ruled Alberta. Swimming in oil, they promised to plan for a rainy day. When it rained, they were fresh out of umbrellas.
These are the financial geniuses that want to convince voters that the NDP are economic mismanagers.


David Amos
David Amos
@Dan Cooper Methinks that CBC has been know to mislead us in the past N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276


Jayme Reid
Danny Tanker
"What's at stake in final Ontario leaders' debate?"

The very future of your entire Province if you don't make the right choice, that's what.

I implore all Ontarions to vote, make your ballot count, exercise your rights but DO NOT vote for the Conservative candidate Doug Ford. If you do, you will regret it.


Jayme Reid
Jayme Reid
@Danny Tanker

The Ndp is no better.

Danny Tanker
Danny Tanker
@Jayme Reid

"The Ndp is no better."

I think they are but by a narrow margin, far better than Doug Ford who admires Trump, that alone ought to make you quiver with fear for the future of your Province


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos 
@Danny Tanker "I implore all Ontarions to vote, make your ballot count, exercise your rights but"

Methinks I should inform you that I strongly disagree with the rest of your statement in a bigtime fashion.

The last thing I am is a fan of Dougy Ford or anyone else. I truly believe folks should look to their interests and ignore all political party rhetoric then vote for anyone they wish within whatever riding they are in whom they think best represents their take on the scene.

I truly hope they do not vote for the incumbents no matter what colour of coat they wear. If that were to happen and enough new souls found a seat in the Legislative Assembly then they would see politicking change in Ontario N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Danny Tanker Methinks you should wonder why my reply to you has been disabled hours later and after it being read and liked and disliked several times N'esy Pas?


Robin Blair
Robin Blair
@Danny Tanker

Buck-A-Beer! Who could say no?

I'll bet we see Dougie sweating tonight!


David Amos
David Amos
@Robin Blair "I'll bet we see Dougie sweating tonight!"

Methinks I replied to that comment earlier and everything went "Poof' N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Bill Nazarene Methinks the Fake Left only care about staying aboard the gravy train N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Jack Christian Tu Tut Tut Jacky Boy Methinks your daddy should have taught you not to insult strangers Some of them may not receive it well N'esy Pas?

Kay Smith
Kay Smith
I guess the working people were not home to take a phone call from Forum polls


David Amos
David Amos
@Kay Smith LOL


Kay Smith 
Kay Smith
notice the Cons with Ford and again like with Scheer are not supporting Ford but attacking the others .
I guess it is hard to support those 2


Ron Vollans
Ron Vollans
@Ron Frier
Wishful thinking is easy to spot. No matter what they say, the cons know their party has blown it again. You would think they would learn what is causing these meltdowns.

David Amos
David Amos
@Ron Vollans Methinks it ain't over til the Fat Lady sings and there is only one poll that truly counts Hillary figured that out the hard way N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Kay Smith Methinks Scheer like Trudeau The Younger knows how important this election is to their upcoming federal showdown next year N'esy Pas?


Bertrum G.Gruff  
Bertrum G.Gruff
2015 desperate Fed Cons mailed retroactive family allowance cheques to everyone with a child,
then branded NDP as 'socialists'


David Amos
David Amos
@Bertrum G.Gruff Methinks everybody knows the NDP are socialists without Harper having to inform us N'esy Pas?



Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
@Danny Tanker if you are happy with how things are then voting either Liberal or NDP makes no difference. Their exactly the same party both practising pie in the sky economics and broken promises. But if you want real change for the better you can vote PC.

David Amos
David Amos
@Frank Gallagher Methinks folks would see a real change but the proof of things being better will be in the pudding after a couple of years N'esy Pas?


Steven Scott
Dave Singh
Doug hasn't presented any program to the electorate, he'll probably make it up as it goes, just like Donald down south.


David Amos
David Amos
@Dave Singh YUP

  
Steven Scott
Chris Maurier
Doug started his Campaign stating he has a proven track record of governance .. No one explained to him that running interference for his brother for a yr. at city hall and having a failing bid to be Mayor wasn't a True Proven track record.


Dave Ryan
Dave Ryan
@ Chris Maurier This to me seems to be the major problem with politics these days. The fact he says it is one problem, but the fact that no one calls him on it seems to be a bigger problem - or if he is called on it, the base just ignores it. I have seen nothing in Doug Ford's background that shows he will be a good leader. He took second fiddle to his brother, and we all know what he was all about. Enough said.

David Amos
David Amos
@Dave Ryan "Enough said."

So you say

Steven Scott
Bob Jenkins
Public sector unions = Liberals have sucked Ontario dry.

David Amos
David Amos
@Bob Jenkins True


Margaret Bricknell
Al. C Hill
The Manitoba debt...generated by the NDP....will take a generation to pay off..if Ontario think they are in bad shape now...put the NDP in power...then they will really see out of control spending and debt


Margaret Bricknell
Margaret Bricknell
@Philip Nicholson
The Manitoba government.
Manitoba's primary political parties are the New Democratic Party of Manitoba (NDP) and the Progressive Conservative Party of Manitoba. The current premier of Manitoba is Brian Pallister, who replaced Greg Selinger of the New Democratic Party to lead the Conservative majority government of 40 seats.

David Amos
David Amos
@Margaret Bricknell Methinks I see no need to explain why dudes such as Brian Pallister are joke to me N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/pallister-costa-rica-vacation-home-luxury-tax-1.4605666



John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@David Amos

The phrase you're looking for is: n'est-ce pas?

N'esy Pas isn't anything...


Steven Scott 
David Polk
I sugggest voters add up the Ford promises and the Ford tax cuts. The remarkable sum is very frightening. It really isn't hard to look these up. Then decide if you want to support the PCs.


David Amos
David Amos
@David Polk Methinks swing voters will decide this election like they always do because most folks will vote for the colour of the coat like they always do The big decision as to wins will be how many liberals will vote NDP this time or simply stay home N'esy Pas?


Phil Simpson
Francis Culligan
Doug Ford has not provided Ontarians with his platform. What is he hiding? How can a thinking person vote for someone unwilling to share what he intends to do?


David Amos
David Amos
@Francis Culligan Methinks many folks are disgusted with what the liberal have already done and are afraid of what the NDP are promising to do N'esy Pas?


Evan Mulligan
 Francis Culligan
Ford didn't even finish university. Why didn't he have to? Daddy.


David Foster
David Foster
@Francis Culligan
That's your qualifier??
How many academics that have been elected have but our province deep into debt.

David Amos
David Amos
@David Foster Good Point Sir


David Amos
David Amos
@Margaret Bricknell Methinks common folks know that there are a lot snobby people with fine educations who should not be trusted as far as one could throw them and we have the right to vote too N'esy Pas?
  
David Foster
Don Pooley
I told my PC candidate no platform no vote. Why should I have blind faith in Ford? I'm not in the habit of buying pigs in a poke, which is what Ford is selling.


William Voz
William Voz
@Don Pooley

I'm going with the party that will put more of my money in my pocket.

PC all the way.


David Amos
David Amos
@William Voz Methinks you are brutally honest about your voting intentions N'esy Pas?


Evan Mulligan 
Evan Mulligan
Expect Wynne to come out swinging. Her party is in for a defeat of historic proportions.

Expect Ford to blame the "mainstream media" and "elites" for his falloff in support. Bur do not expect him to actually present a plan.

Expect Horwath to target Ford, because that's where her best chance lies to draw support from the PCs to the NDP.

Expect the Greens to insist that the sky is falling. Again.


David Amos
David Amos
@Evan Mulligan I agree


Owen Frank
Owen Frank
@Evan Mulligan voting ....the best of the worst is?

Evan Mulligan
Evan Mulligan
@Owen Frank

I honestly don't know.

David Amos
David Amos
@Evan Mulligan Methinks everyone should appreciate your honesty but most won't N'esy Pas?
  
Al. C  Hill
Ernest Gregson
It’s beginning to look like a whole new crop of voters (aka millennials) are going to learn the hard way that living above your means is not sustainable and cradle to grave coddling will come with consequences. Those who do not know/remember history are doomed to repeat it.


David Amos
David Amos
@Ernest Gregson "Those who do not know/remember history are doomed to repeat it."

True

Methinks George Santayana was a wise guy.

The following is true as well N'esy Pas?

"Most men’s conscience, habits, and opinions are borrowed from convention and gather continual comforting assurances from the same social consensus that originally suggested them."


Al. C  Hill
Will McComb
Corruption in Ontario politics is entrenched. Not a new phenomenon, been there since Ontario became a Province , hard to get rid of it!


David Amos
David Amos
@Will McComb I concur




Patrick Brown says he's not to blame for Doug Ford's campaign woes

'This is the Progressive Conservatives' election to lose,' the former Ontario PC leader told CBC News

Hannah Thibedeau, Christina Romualdo· CBC News· Posted: May 28, 2018 7:04 PM ET



'The PCs had a slight lead in previous elections and it evaporated, but never anything like this,' former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown told Hannah Thibedeau of CBC News. (CBC)




He's not the party leader anymore. He's not even running for a seat.

But former Ontario Progressive Conservative leader Patrick Brown's name keeps popping up in the Ontario provincial election — whenever Liberals and New Democrats take his successor, Doug Ford, to task over lingering questions about contested PC nomination battles.

"You want to get answers on this, Patrick Brown was the leader under this whole group of people," Ford said during an event earlier this month in Baysville, Ont., when questioned about a private company's claim that data belonging to 60,000 customers had been breached.

The company, 407 ETR, runs a toll highway. Simmer Sandhu, who worked for the company for nine years, recently quit as the PC candidate in Brampton East over what he called allegations "pertaining to both my work life and my nomination campaign."

Brown has kept a relatively low profile since stepping down as leader in January after CTV News reported that two women were accusing him of sexual assault.

Brown has denied the reports and is suing CTV for $8 million. CTV News says it stands by the story.
But Ford's repeated claim that Brown left the party in ruins has drawn him out. Hours before the three major party leaders gathered Sunday night for the final debate of the election, Brown sat down with CBC News to talk about how the PC campaign is going so far — and to suggest that Ford is dropping the ball.
[The Progressive Conservatives] have snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory before, but never with a lead this big. - former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown
"You know, Doug may not have wanted to say, 'Talk to Patrick Brown,'" he said. "Because the facts tell a very different story.

"When I left we had a 20-point lead in the polls, a massive financial advantage, the largest membership, the most diverse membership in the province of Ontario. And we were winning by-elections left, right and centre."

That early advantage for the PCs seems to have evaporated over the course of the campaign. On Jan. 13, less than two weeks before Brown's resignation, the CBC Poll Tracker gave the PCs a lead of 12.5 points over the governing Liberals; the NDP was trailing in third, at 22 per cent.

On Mar. 11, the day after Progressive Conservatives elected Doug Ford as their leader, the party held a 20-point lead over the Liberals. The New Democrats trailed far behind at 24 per cent.

PCs' election to lose


On Monday, the day after the final leaders' debate, the PCs were at 35.9 per cent to the NDP's 35.2 per cent in the CBC's polling average.

"This is the Progressive Conservatives' election to lose," Brown said, adding that — given the substantial head-start the party had going into the campaign — anything short of a majority PC government would look like failure.

"[The Progressive Conservatives] have snatched defeat out of the jaws of victory before, but never with a lead this big. Never with an advantage this big. The PCs had a slight lead in previous elections and it evaporated, but never anything like this."
Sandhu's resignation and lingering questions about 407 ETR data aren't the only dark clouds hanging over Progressive Conservative candidate nominations during this campaign. In February, the party overturned two nominations in Scarborough Centre and Ottawa West-Nepean following reports of voting irregularities.

More recently, Ford himself was accused of interfering in a local party nomination race by signing up bogus members to help a candidate of his choice. The Liberals released documents and an audio recording of Ford that they claimed show him suggesting the fees would be paid by others — a violation of party rules.

"It was so frustrating," Brown said. He called on Elections Ontario to run party nominations to avoid allegations of manipulation of memberships.

"A party run by volunteers isn't adequately equipped to run nominations because they can be enormous affairs," he said.

"When the stakes are the opportunity to become an MPP and the opportunity to be part of a winning team, people will go to extensive lengths to win those nominations. And we've seen in some cases inappropriate lengths to win those nominations."

Patrick Brown: PC loss would be disappointing
00:0000:40
 
 
 
Former Ontario Progressive Conservative leader Patrick Brown says that it would be disappointing to see the PCs snatch defeat from the jaws of victory once again. 0:40
 
Brown refrained from directly implicating Ford in any of the nomination controversies, but he also rejected the suggestion that Ford was completely out of the loop.

"Doug Ford has been a big part of the PC party for the last number of years," he said. "He was active in these nominations, particularly Etobicoke and Scarborough, and some of his candidates won and some of his candidates lost."

But how does Brown feel about Ford's approach to the campaign he'd been planning to lead himself? Brown said he's taking care to avoid directly criticizing his successor.

"I'm not gonna be a backseat driver, I'm not going to provide criticisms or advice to the current leader," he said. "[Ford] hasn't asked for that."

No love lost


But Brown acknowledges that Ford is further to the right — and that the two men aren't exactly friends.

"I'm not particularly close with Doug Ford," he said. "I obviously I'm more of a progressive conservative and we share different perspectives.

"I was proud to be the first PC leader to take an official delegation in the Toronto Pride Parade. I was proud to be the only Conservative leader in the country to speak against Islamophobia ... I was proud to lead a Conservative party that recognized climate change is man-made and we have to do our part."

Brown says he is 'more of a progressive conservative' than Ontario PC leader Doug Ford, pictured. He also said they are not friends. (Samantha Craggs/CBC)
 
 
Ford's populism has invited a lot of comparisons to U.S. President Donald Trump. Brown said that's not a brand that works in Ontario.

"But I think Bill Davis's moderate progressive conservatism was a great fit for this province and it was right for our times."

He said he has had "mixed emotions" about watching the progress of the Ford campaign from the outside — particularly after Ford blamed what he called the "mess" Brown left behind for his decision to appoint 11 candidates in ridings across the province.

"The turn of events that I went through I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy," Brown said. "But I still have lots of very good friends in the Progressive Conservative Party and I only wish them well.

"When I ... won the leadership of the PC Party of Ontario in 2015, we had a $7 million debt. We were almost financially bankrupt. We had the worst finances of all the political parties in Ontario. When I left we had $4 million in the bank.

"When I ran for the leadership we had 12,000 party members. When I left ... it was the largest in Ontario history and we had seen a membership growth that was unparalleled.

"So to say there was a 'mess' is a very inaccurate picture."

'Never say never'


No one from the Ford camp would comment on Brown's words. An official close to the Ford campaign suggested Brown is trying to rehabilitate his public image to clear the way for a return to politics.

Brown won't rule it out.

"You never say never," he said.

"I'm not going to jump to any quick decisions. I do love public service, despite everything I've been through. I believe politics and public service can be a means to do good for your community. But I feel very fortunate to have friends and family and good health. And I'm enjoying life."




What's at stake in final Ontario leaders' debate?

In the 3 weeks since the first televised debate, the campaign has changed dramatically



Joanne Chianello· CBC News· Posted: May 27, 2018 4:00 AM ET


NDP Leader Andrea Horwath, Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne and PC Leader Doug Ford will debate Sunday night for the last time before election day June 7. (Chris Young/Canadian Press, Michael Charles Cole/CBC and Carlo Allegri/Reuters)


In the first televised debate between Ontario's major political leaders almost three weeks ago, NDP Leader Andrea Horwath literally set herself apart from her opponents, standing to the side of them, trying to convince voters that they had a choice other than the governing Liberals or front-running Progressive Conservatives.


Apparently her approach has worked.

Since that debate, the PCs' huge lead has collapsed, the NDP has experienced an unprecedented surge in popularity, and the Liberals — who had once contemplated a future as the Official Opposition after 15 years in office — now face a potentially humiliating loss on voting day.
With the political tables turned so dramaticallySunday evening's debate — the last before the polls open on June 7 — has the potential to be an exciting 90 minutes that could help decide who will be the next premier of Ontario.

"I don't think I've seen this much momentum behind a candidate in a major election campaign, well, ever," said EKOS Research president Frank Graves, of the NDP's leap forward in opinion polls.

With an NDP victory well within the realm of possibility, Horwath's performance at Sunday night's debate could be markedly different from her previous outing. 

NDP Leader Andrea Horwath will likely be a target in the debate. (Marta Iwanek/Canadian Press)

Horwath: Confident or defensive?


Horwath's lead in the polls, however slight, could give her confidence, said Graves. "Maybe she's thinking, 'I'm on fire!'"

But it won't be easy going. In the earlier debate, Horwath was seen as a benign third-placer. Now, she will be the target of both Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne and Progressive Conservative Leader Doug Ford.

Wynne will undoubtedly bring up the NDP's platform calculation error that led to the party's proposed deficit being understated by $1.4 billion.
The PCs have spent the past week exposing — and criticizing — questionable comments of a number of NDP candidates. One of the most recent controversies was an NDP candidate in Toronto who had posted a meme of Hitler on her Facebook page. (The candidate says she has no idea how the meme got there.)

Expect Ford to go after Horwath over the selection of these candidates, slamming the NDP leader for not dismissing them or denouncing some of their past statements more forcefully.

Both strategies will aim to show that Horwath and the NDP aren't ready, or shouldn't be trusted, to take the helm of the province. Horwath could be spending a fair amount of time on the defensive. She needs to remind people of why they were drawn to her, but also convince them that she will be able to handle the role of premier.

PC Leader Doug Ford will have to turn around cratering support. (Tara Walton/Canadian Press)

Ford: Needs to look 'premier ready'


Although Ford will likely bring up the Hitler-meme NDP candidate, he'll be skating on pretty thin ice when it comes to criticizing other parties' candidates. One of his candidates in Brampton was forced to resign over his alleged links to stolen data from the company that oversees Highway 407, and there are further accusations that a number of PC candidates may have used that data to help win their nominations. Elections Ontario is investigating.

Just days ago, the Liberals released an audio tape that features Ford allegedly offering to buy people's party memberships to secure the PC nomination of his preferred candidate in his home riding of Etobicoke Centre.
And while Ford has vowed to release a fully costed PC platform, there is no sign of it with less than two weeks until voting day. The cost of his promises have outweighed his unspecified plans to find "efficiencies" — which the other two leaders will characterize as cuts to core services.

"Doug Ford needs to somehow figure out a strategy for stopping the cratering of his support," said Ihor Korbabicz of Abacus Data.

Graves is even more blunt: "He needs to look premier ready."

That won't be easy, with the allegations against him and his party that Wynne and Horwath are likely to come back to again and again.

In the first debate, Ford merely needed to reassure. This time around, he has to win back the support he's lost.

Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne is trailing well behind in the polls. She has nothing to lose in Sunday's debate. (David Donnelly/CBC)

Wynne: A chance to reconnect?


After winning a surprise majority in the last election, Wynne is trailing far behind in the polls. She's got nothing to lose in this debate, which may be to her advantage. She's by far the best speaker of the three leaders, which will come in handy when the debate gets heated.

"It might be fun being Kathleen Wynne in this debate, even if it hasn't been fun being Kathleen Wynne in this campaign," said Korbabicz.
After being criticized in the first debate for delving too deeply into policy on occasion, Wynne will likely divide her time between trying to show why her opponents are not fit to govern and reintroducing her plan to help the people of Ontario.

But according to a member of her team, don't expect any potshots from the Liberal leader. She's planning to take the high road — even if Ford mentions her smile again — to reconnect with anxious voters.

But with previous surveys showing that more than three-quarters of voters want a change, it's unclear whether this debate offers a real chance to convince jaded Ontarians to reconsider the Liberals.

About the Author


Joanne Chianello
City affairs analyst
Joanne Chianello is an award-winning journalist and CBC Ottawa's city affairs analyst. You can email her at joanne.chianello@cbc.ca or tweet her at @jchianello.
 

Hmmm Nobody has called or wrote me back yet Methinks I should not be surprised N'esy Pas?

$
0
0
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 06:40:41 -0400
Subject: Attn Marcus Kingston and and Jason Jeandron I just called and left a message
To: marcus.kingston@gnb.ca, "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>,
jasonjeandron@hotmail.com, "Elizabeth.Fraser"<Elizabeth.Fraser@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
 "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
 markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,  "martin.gaudet"<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "leanne.murray"<leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>,
"mike.obrienfred"<mike.obrienfred@gmail.com>, "mike.obrien"<mike.obrien@fredericton.ca>, BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com>


Tree commission chair urges Fredericton to hold off on Officers' Square project

City plans to cut down 19 trees at square and didn't consult its tree advisory group until 2 weeks ago

Elizabeth Fraser· CBC News· Posted: May 28, 2018 11:19 AM AT


12 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


David Amos
David Amos
Hmmm Methinks I should a few calls N'esy Pas?



http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/officers-square-trees-fredericton-1.4681846


Pressure mounts to save 19 trees that will be cut down in Officers' Square

Close to 100 people protested against new development at Monday night's council meeting



Gary Moore· CBC News· Posted: May 29, 2018 7:12 AM AT

32 Comments


David Amos 
David Amos
Hmmm Nobody has called or wrote me back yet Methinks I should not be surprised N'esy Pas?


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@David Amos NOPE



David Amos
David Amos
@David Amos Methinks it is kinda obvious that I am not well liked by "peoplekind" in Fredericton Perhaps I should run for public office there again and tell them awful truth about themsleves N'esy Pas?


Michael G. L. Geraldson 
Michael G. L. Geraldson
I have no vested interest in saving the trees, I don't live, work or play there. However, I lost all of my elms back in the eighties to Dutch elm disease and that loss forever changed my property and my appreciation of my tree lined driveway. Think carefully about what you're doing, when they're gone, they're gone for good!


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Michael G. L. Geraldson YUP


David Amos
David Amos
@Michael G. L. Geraldson Methinks it is rather strange that you are the only soul whom I am not allowed to agree with N'esy Pas?


Michael G. L. Geraldson
 Rob Glencross
This reminds me of when the city tried to install a median down the middle of York Street at Kings College Road… at least they reconsidered that one.


David Amos
David Amos
@Rob Glencross Methinks Brad Woodside set the bar pretty high when its comes to a Fat Fred City Mayor changing his mind N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fredericton-holds-1st-pride-parade-1.946888
  
Michael G. L. Geraldson
 Ed Tour
The Mayor and Council forgot to ask the Province for permission to cut trees down in THEIR park. According to the Tourism Minister, Officer's Square belongs to the Province and NOT the City and the City needs permission from the Province to cut any trees. I guess the Mayor should think BEFORE he speaks.


David Amos
David Amos
@Ed Tour "The Mayor and Council forgot to ask the Province for permission to cut trees down"

NOPE Methinks they don't have to The park is in their jurisdiction and they are responsible for it N'esy Pas?
Matt Steele
 Matt Steele
Officers Square is a heritage area ; and should be left that way , surely they can find somewhere else to build their skating rink . I am surprised that the mayor has not proposed a round about be built in Officers Square as that seems to be his pet project these day.


David Amos

David Amos
@Matt Steele YUP

Murray Brown
Murray Brown
A mechanized outdoor skating rink on historic ground like Officer's Square is ridiculous. It's a terrible place to have a skating surface... It may be useful for civil servants for that month or two when it's actually usable... But a better local for an 'outdoor' skating facility would be the Exhibition grounds. In fact, more people lounge about at the Exhibition grounds than at Officer's square on a nightly basis, even during the winter.


David Amos
David Amos
@Murray Brown YUP


Paul Bourgoin 
Joel Green
You can NOT divulge the consequences of progress AFTER consultations, and after work has been started. Officers Square is the focal point of Fredericton, the City of Elms, and to remove almost all of them is ridiculous. Had citizens and councilors known of the plan to remove the trees, they may have altered their position or been able to propose less invasive options . That is poor governance. Mayor O'Brien, I submit that your chances for re-election are directly proportional to the percentage of trees that remain standing in Officers Square.


David Amos
David Amos
@Joel Green YUP


Paul Bourgoin 
Paul Bourgoin
New Brunswick, The Canadian clear cut Province!! : - (
SO SAD!!


David Amos
David Amos
@Paul Bourgoin YUP


Paul Bourgoin 
Brad Little
I wish people would take as much interest in provincial politics and economy as they do in a few trees in downtown Fredericton. The amount of uproar about this is ridiculous. There's more important things to take a stand on in this place.


louella woods
louella woods
@Brad Little it is not only the removal of the trees... the city is creating a concrete jungle from this beautiful pristine park like area and spending $9 million of taxpayers money to do it. check out the plan.. This is an issue of the economy..

David Amos
David Amos
@louella woods YUP


louella woods
Colin Seeley
Progress.

Not in this Place.


David Amos
David Amos
@Colin Seeley YUP


louella woods 
Lou Bell
And to think 3 weeks ago it was just a huge, overflowed septic tank fed by the Saint John River !


David Amos
David Amos
@Lou Bell YUP


Ed Tour
Colin Seeley
19 Trees
vs
bringing peoplekinds together.

Mayor and council need to have one word for these pretenser’s .

NO.


Ed Tour
Ed Tour
@Colin Seeley The Province already had a word for the City and that word was "no".

Colin Seeley
Colin Seeley
@Ed Tour

The Province has not said no. They will review.

The area is an unused dump.

Needs the Reno.

David Amos
David Amos
@Colin Seeley Nope

  
Colin Seeley
Roy Nicholl
While the Lorax is speaking for the trees, why not scrap City Halls plan to excavate the majority of the square to install a chiller pad - as both an action to preserve the outdoor skating against fluctuating winter temperatures and as a contribution toward the amplitude and frequency of those fluctuations?


David Amos
David Amos
@Roy Nicholl That went over my head Methinks I should look up what Tesla said on the topic N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
Methinks that nobody should deny that the "peoplekind" in Fat Fred City love a circus N'esy Pas?



http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/officers-square-trees-fredericton-1.4681909


Not just trees: Archeologist laments possible losses under Officers' Square project

Jason Jeandron says it's up to the province to enforce rules before Fredericton developments go ahead


Nineteen trees are set to be cut down in coming months to revamp Officers' Square in Fredericton. (CBC)

Pieces of history are at risk of being lost forever as work is done on St. Anne's Point Boulevard and Officers' Square, a Fredericton archeologist says.

Jason Jeandron said legislation requires that sections in both areas be excavated before heavy equipment is brought in for development work.

"This is a significant historic site both to the country and the people of New Brunswick and obviously the city of Fredericton," he said in an interview with Information Morning Fredericton.

"This is a real jewel, this is one of the things that sets Fredericton apart."

The green space at Officers' Square is recognized by the province and Parks Canada as a historical area.


Most of the trees to disappear are beside the wall along the square, which is getting a facelift. (CBC)
But the city plans to cut down 19 trees in coming months, starting with eight next week, although the trees are part of Officers' Square's character, Jeandron said.

The removal coincides with a planned revitalization of Officers' Square in the next four years. Most of the trees to disappear are beside the wall along the square.

One of the city's arguments for taking down the trees is that their roots would be compromised by major construction work being done on St. Anne's Point Boulevard this summer.

Although there have been protests against the removal of trees, Jeandron said the potential loss of history is just as disturbing.

Digging up the past


"You've got a huge volume of very significant archeology at that location," he said. "Largely, in part, what helps it to be defined as a national historic site and a provincial heritage place."
We've also got the potential for at least 8,000 years of archeological evidence of the ancestors of today's  Wolastoq  in that location.- Jason  Jeandron , archeologist 
He said the space at Officers' Square has at least four triggers for a required archeological excavation.
Excavation would be needed if a location is within 50 metres of a shoreline, the development extends onto a flood plain, if it's within 100 metres of a recorded historic site or if it's on an intervale.

"Any areas that they have the potential to destroy the archeology, then you want to collect all that information," he said.

"That's where the story comes from, it is the artifacts in the ground and how they're placed [with] each other."

A historical site


In 1784, Jeandron said, the British developed a garrison at the site, which grew to more than 50 buildings. Only four of those buildings from the military compound remain today and they were built in the early 1820s.

The Royal Canadian Regiment was formed Dec. 21, 1883, at that location, which Jeandron said gives it a significant place in the history of the Canadian army.

But much more than military history is stored at Officers' Square, he said.

At the northern end of the parking lot by the square is the old shoreline of the St. John River, known to Maliseet First Nations as Wolastoq. St. Anne's Point Boulevard now goes over the area, which was filled in for that purpose.


Jason Jeandron, an archaeologist in Fredericton, said sections of Officers' Square should be excavated before heavy equipment is brought in for development. (CBC)
"We've also got the potential for at least 8,000 years of archeological evidence of the ancestors of today's Wolastoq in that location."

Jeandron said there's also the possibility archeologists would discover early pieces of Acadian and Loyalist settlement in the area.

But if there isn't excavation to uncover artifacts, the information associated with people who lived in the area over the centuries will be gone.

"Apart from a handful of small sites, we have very little information about how people occupied and lived on the banks of the Wolastoq and lived in our community."

Province to enforce rules


Jeandron said it's up to the province to enforce the rules about archeological work before development makes it impossible

Johanne Leblanc, a spokesperson for the Department of Tourism, Heritage and Culture, suggested archeological and geophysical evaluations were done to identify locations of archeological interest at Officers' Square.

Character-defining elements of the area included "large mature trees" and "discovered and yet-to-be discovered archeological resources," she said in an email.

She said the province is considering approving a "site alteration plan," but final project plans will be required before approval can be final.



Information Morning - Fredericton
History of Officers' Square important too.


00:0016:43



Archaeologist Jason Jeandron says history should dictate what happens to Officers' Square. 16:43
 
Leblanc was asked later to explain what was involved in the evaluations and to elaborate on the "discovered and yet-to-be discovered archeological resources," but at the end of the day she said she couldn't answer.

Public not impressed


At least 1,000 people have signed an online petition calling on the city to put the brakes on the Officers' Square plan.

Close to 100 residents attended Monday night's council meeting to protest against the removing the downtown trees.


People gathered outside of Fredericton City Hall to voice concerns about the tree-cutting, the second rally in three days. (Gary Moore/CBC)
The crowd roared at the meeting when council denied a motion to add an item to the agenda — which would have delayed work at the heritage site.

After the meeting, Mayor Mike O'Brien said he plans to consult with staff to "dig deep" in attempt to save some of the trees but he wasn't promising anything.
With files from Information Morning Fredericton



Pressure mounts to save 19 trees that will be cut down in Officers' Square

Close to 100 people protested against new development at Monday night's council meeting



Gary Moore· CBC News· Posted: May 29, 2018 7:12 AM AT 


People gathered outside Fredericton City Hall on Monday to voice concerns over the city's plan to cut down 19 trees in Officers' Square. This was the second rally in three days. (Gary Moore/CBC)



A development that will force 19 trees to be cut down at Officers' Square will continue as planned, Fredericton Mayor Mike O'Brien.

But after a city council meeting Monday night, O'Brien said he also plans to consult with staff to "dig deep" for a way to save some of the trees.

And time is running out.
"Is there a way to save a couple trees?… I can't promise that, but I know they'll be looking hard to see if there's an opportunity."

The removal coincides with a planned revitalization of Officers' Square in the next four years. Most of the trees that will be cut down are beside the wall along Officers' Square, and vary in age.

Before the council meeting, a crowd gathered on the steps of City Hall to voice concerns about losing the trees.

Irresponsible representation


Inside, frustration continued to grow throughout the evening.

When council denied a motion to add an item to the agenda — which would have delayed work to the heritage site — Lily Smallwood shouted from the upper level, "irresponsible representation" to the mayor and council.




Protesters wrap Officer's Square trees in blankets
00:0000:53



A development that will force 19 trees to be cut down at Officers' Square will continue as planned, the mayor of Fredericton says. 0:53
At the same time, close to 100 other people erupted with anger, forcing the mayor and council to clear the chamber for several minutes.


Lily Smallwood and her son James Gwathmey were in the gallery during Monday's council meeting. (Gary Moore/CBC)
"We weren't asking them to make a decision right now, we were asking them to talk about it," said Smallwood, who attended the city council meeting with her son, James Gwathmey.

The public was hoping council would reconsider its decision to cut down the 19 trees at Officers' Square in coming months.

This was the second gathering of its kind from the public in just a few days.

Over the weekend, dozens of residents gathered in Officers' Square to protest against the city's plans to chop down the trees.

Not enough public consultation


At the meeting, Coun. Kate Rogers made the request to give city staff a chance to re-examine the construction plans and look at ways to save the trees.

Rogers said not enough public consultation was done on the Officers' Square project.


Coun. Kate Rogers said the public wasn't properly consulted on plans to cut down the trees in Officers' Square. (Gary Moore/CBC)
If council agreed to halt the project, she said, it would take staff only two or three weeks to consider alternative plans that could save the trees.

"To me it's our responsibility as elected officials to respond to the interests of our constituents," Rogers said to reporters after the meeting.

"There was clearly a desire amongst our constituency to have a further discussion on this."
O'Brien said he doesn't know what day the first tree is scheduled to come down, but said it will be soon. 

About the Author


Gary Moore
CBC News
Gary Moore recently moved from Corner Brook, NL to join the CBC team in Fredericton. He's an associate producer with Information Morning.



Tree commission chair urges Fredericton to hold off on Officers' Square project

City plans to cut down 19 trees at square and didn't consult its tree advisory group until 2 weeks ago

Elizabeth Fraser· CBC News· Posted: May 28, 2018 11:19 AM AT

Nineteen trees are expected to be cut down in coming weeks and months to make room for new development in Fredericton's Officers' Square. (Philip Drost/CBC News)



A commission set up to help manage and protect Fredericton trees wants the city to delay a project that will remove all but four trees from Officers' Square this summer.

The Fredericton Tree Commission only learned from city staff about two weeks ago about plans to take down 19 trees at the downtown gathering and performance space, said Sarah Weatherby, chair of the advisory group.

"They've been working on the plan for about four years," Weatherby said Monday. "And two weeks ago that was the first time that we were involved.
"That was the first time we had heard just how many trees were actually being removed. It was a bit of a shocker."

The tree removal could start as early as this week, with eight trees on the block.

The removal coincides with a planned revitalization of Officers' Square in the next four years. Most of the trees to disappear are beside the wall along Officers' Square, and they vary in age.
Sometimes with these new developments, we're losing sight of what's really important.- Sarah Weatherby , tree commission
Greg McCann, a project engineer with the city, said earlier that the 19 trees won't survive a sizeable construction project planned for Point St. Anne Boulevard this year.

Coun. Greg Ericson, who is council's representative on the tree commission, said that although the chair and some members of the commission were never briefed on the Officers' Square plan, at least two members — two city staffers on the committee —  knew about it for years.

He cited a communication problem but couldn't say why the collaboration with the commission, which would be expected on such projects, didn't happen.

The group will meet Thursday night to "straighten things out" and discuss how it should proceed as a group with respect to a stance on the tree-removal issue.

Mayor Mike O'Brien also planned to raise the issue at Monday's council meeting.
"The larger part is still off into the future," said Ericson.

The planned makeover for the square includes an oval skating track around the outside of the lawn, a performance stage, playground, and food and beverage area.

The city said it will eventually plant 40 trees in the area, a majority of them elms.




Construction season has begun in Fredericton
00:0001:43



 
There are 22 major construction projects taking place in Fredericton this summer, which will cost more than $30 million. 1:43
When the removal is finished, four trees will be left standing at Officers' Square.

"I did feel a little bulldozed," said Weatherby, who has been a part of the commission for four years.
"They [city] definitely weren't coming to talk to us about our advice … they were telling us, 'This is what's happening and why.'"

At that meeting, the commission made recommendations to city staff, including using a tree spade — a giant shovel — to remove some of the trees along the wall in the square to a new location.
But Weatherby said she's hoping the city will hold off on the upgrades altogether and assess the real need for them.


After discovering 19 trees will be cut down in Officers' Square, Sarah Weatherby, chair of Fredericton's tree commission, is hopeful the city will rethink its development plans for the area. (CBC)
"I really think they need to rethink the development," she said.

In the past, she said, the tree commission has been contacted early on by the city about plans involving trees.

"This is a fairly big development," she said. "But we were definitely brought in quite late in the game."

Public not impressed


Over the weekend, dozens of residents gathered in Officers' Square to protest against the city's plans to chop down the trees.

Protesters argued the loss of trees will destroy the history and beauty of the park.

O'Brien said he couldn't commit to anything except a promise to take the protesters' comments back to council and staff for a discussion about whether anything can be done.


Protesters gathered in Officers' Square on Saturday to send a message they want the trees saved. (Sarah Petz/CBC )
Weatherby applauded the public's passion for keeping the trees and its efforts to put pressure on council.

She said the trees provide more than just shade. They lower heating and cooling costs, they take away pollution from the air, reduce storm-water runoff and sway people to spend more time in the downtown, which is good for the city economy.

The commission will meet with the city in July to discuss the new trees being planted and other suggestions.

"Sometimes with these new developments, we're losing sight of what's really important," Weatherby said. "The trees are an important part of the infrastructure downtown."
With files from Information Morning Fredericton
 

Methinks it should be no surprise as to why CBC did not offer a comment section about this "News" item today N'esy Pas?

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberals-trans-mountain-pipeline-kinder-morgan-1.4681911


Liberals to buy Trans Mountain pipeline for $4.5B to ensure expansion is built

Canadian public could also incur millions to construct expansion project with estimated price tag of $7.4B

Kathleen Harris· CBC News· Posted: May 29, 2018 8:15 AM ET


8030 Comments


Paul Douglas 
Paul Douglas
A constitutional crisis of the Trudeau Liberals own making.
The Canadian taxpayer will foot the bill once again.


David Amos
David Amos
@david mccaig "The ONLY TIME these right wingers agree with Justin Trudeau IS WHEN HE'S WRONG"

Methinks the left wingnuts are having a bad day N'esy Pas?


Rick Guthrie 
Rick Guthrie
A small minority of alarmist must not be allowed to stop this national project.


Erika Blair
Erika Blair
@Rick Guthrie
Actually, it's about half the nation against this federal move and that will only grow. The Liberals are finished in the west.

David Amos
David Amos
@Erika Blair Methinks Trudeau The Younger and his sunny days and sunny ways in 2015 may be a mere matter of history for his peoplekind to review now that even his Carbon Tax plan is jeopardy if Doug Ford wins a mandate N'esy Pas?

  
Bill Hill
Marc R Henry
In other words, Canada and the Trudeau Liberals were incapable of getting its act together so that a private company could come in and complete a simple project at no cost to taxpayers. In my books the Trudeau Liberals have failed, regardless of how the pipeline gets built . They'll throw unlimited taxpayer dollars at this now to try cut their political losses. Heck, even Nanos has the Liberals in second place in the polls now.


Rob Lehtisaari
Rob Lehtisaari
@Marc R Henry

Those thinking simply, might be found of simple thinking.

David Amos
David Amos
@Rob Lehtisaari Methinks that many of my political foes may wish to claim that I resemble that remark N'esy Pas?

However it appears that they forgot I am for the pipelines going east and west but not south.

Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

 
Dale Boire 
Dale Boire
Whatever the decision the taxpayer will likely be on the hook.


Joseph Power
Joseph Power
@Dale Boire

"The first 20 years of expanded operations would mean a combined government revenue of $46.7 billion, with $5.7 billion for B.C., $19.4 billion for Alberta and $21.6 billion for the rest of Canada."

Did you even read the article?


David Amos
David Amos
@Dale Boire "wishful thinking is always the starting dialogue"

Well Put Sir

  
Bill Hill
Clint Allen
I just can't believe how utterly incompetent this government is.
It's just not Trudeau either, although he so incompetent he's responsible for it all.
It's his choice in ministers, one after another.
I can't think of a single one, except perhaps Garneau that is basically competent.
Worst government in Canadian history.


David Amos
David Amos
@John Gerrits "It's called Sunny Ways. Incompetent PM appointing diverse,incompetent ministers making diverse incompetent decisions for inclusion.."

YUP
 
 
Don Cameron 
Don Cameron
Canadian Press is reporting the Feds are considering BUYING Transmountain as one of the options to solve their pipeline conundrum.

No matter what they choose, it looks like this debacle is going to cost Canadians Billions and Billions of dollars.

Trudeau thinks that every problem can be solved by throwing money at it. Our money.


Dwight Williams
Dwight Williams
@Don Cameron

What I find really fascinating is that pro-pipeline people here are so stupid that you can write a post which can be seen as tacitly opposed to getting the KM pipeline done, but as long as you criticize Trudeau they will still give you plenty of 'likes'.

That's a far worse problem for our democracy than anything Trudeau is going to do.


David Amos
David Amos
@Dwight Williams "What I find really fascinating is that pro-pipeline people here are so stupid"

Methinks its the stupidly of the clowns that helps folks enjoy the circus N'esy Pas?

  
Jacob Hobart
Daryl McBride
Announcing to the world, Canada is closed for business unless it is tax payer funded.


Jacob Hobart
Jacob Hobart
@Daryl McBride Hye now, centrally managed projects are good. That Phoenix project worked out pretty well right? Ah...wait...

Rick Wier
Rick Wier
@Jacob Hobart conservative project, rushed to completion so harper could claim he had done something, conservative failure

Daryl McBride
Daryl McBride
@Rick Wier

Because Trudeau implemented it after he was told it wasn't ready?

David Amos
David Amos
@Daryl McBride True


Jerry Maguire 
Jerry Maguire
Trudeau telling the world we cannot move away from oil fast enough and his finance minister telling a private funding pipeline company and the world we will foot the bill for the pipeline is what we have today folks. The dichotomy of virtue signal and government incompetence is astounding.


David Amos
David Amos
@Jerry Maguire "The dichotomy of virtue signal and government incompetence is astounding."

Methinks you should study things south of the 49th if you enjoy a circus N'esy Pas?

  
Bill Hill
Jacques Renoir
This will be Trudeau's Waterloo.


Karen King
Karen King
@Dary Moed

Apology for what, he got 'er done

Angelica West
Angelica West
@Karen King Nothings done yet cowpoke.

David Amos
David Amos
@Angelica West ROTFLMAO

  
Bill Hill
Richard Dekkar
None of this was necessary. With real political leadership, the laws of this country would be enforced and the pipeline would be built without any taxpayer money at risk. Instead, Canada has become an international laughingstock for deliberately working to hobble its own economy.

David Amos
David Amos 
@Richard Dekkar "None of this was necessary. With real political leadership, the laws of this country would be enforced and the pipeline would be built without any taxpayer money at risk."

I wholeheartedly agree Sir. Methinks it should be no surprise as to why CBC did not offer a comment section about this "News" item today N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/energy-east-saint-john-darling-trans-mountain-federal-1.4683280

Saint John mayor calls on feds to revive Energy East after $4.5B Trans Mountain deal

Don Darling says TransCanada's proposed pipeline project also had 'a lot of merit'


Saint John Mayor Dan Darling hasn't given up on the Energy East pipeline project. (CBC)


Saint John Mayor Don Darling is calling on the federal government to revive the Energy East pipeline in light of its decision Tuesday to spend $4.5 billion to purchase the Trans Mountain pipeline and save the contentious expansion to the B.C. coast.

Last fall, the TransCanada Corp. abandoned its plan to build a pipeline to move crude oil from Alberta to an export terminal in Saint John, blaming new environmental criteria for the project.

But Darling wonders whether the federal government might now intervene.

"It does not seem fair that we couldn't get the level of support," he said. "I mean, it seems like this is a project that the federal government is going to push through at all costs."
"In the case of the Energy East project, I mean, I think the project had a lot of merit. The oil continues to be shipped here by rail bed. We just couldn't seem to get the level of commitment that is being demonstrated … on the West Coast."

Jim Irving, co-chief executive officer of J.D. Irving Limited, also addressed the issue with reporters Tuesday, following his luncheon address marking the Saint John Chamber's 200th anniversary.

"I'm not going to get into the politics of it, that's not my job. But I will tell you we should not let go of Energy East. It's still the right thing for the country," he said.

"This is not just about our region, this is about Canada. You need to get the oil to market on a competitive basis, absolutely essential. And for this part of the country, for New Brunswick in particular, Saint John, [it's] absolutely very important.

"So we'd encourage everybody in Ottawa not to let go. Stick with it."


Jim Irving, co-chief executive officer of J.D. Irving Limited, told reporters the Energy East pipeline 'would be the right thing to have,' not just for New Brunswick, but Canada. (CBC)
Federal Finance Minister Bill Morneau called the decision to purchase the existing Trans Mountain pipeline and the proposed expansion from Kinder Morgan "an investment in Canada's future."

Kinder Morgan had estimated the cost of building the expansion would be $7.4 billion, but Morneau insisted the project will not have a fiscal impact.

He said many groups have already expressed interest in eventually buying the pipeline, including Indigenous groups and pension funds, but it will operate as a Crown corporation for now.

The decision to buy the pipeline came after Kinder Morgan threatened to abandon the project, which is facing opposition and delays by the B.C. government.

Energy East further behind


Federal officials pointed out Tuesday that Trans Mountain was approved by both the National Energy Board and the federal cabinet in 2016, while Energy East never reached that point because of delays to the hearings.

Analysts also said the approval of other pipelines, including Trans Mountain and Keystone XL, weakened the business case for Energy East.

Still, Darling said he plans to follow up with Energy East proponents to see if it's something they can move on.

The proposed Energy East project would have carried more than one million barrels of oil every day from Alberta and Saskatchewan across the country to be refined or exported from plants in New Brunswick and Quebec.

5 more tankers a month


It would have added 1,500 kilometres worth of new oil pipelines to an existing network of more than 3,000 kilometres, which would have been converted from carrying natural gas to carrying oil.

The Trans Mountain agreement, which must still be approved by Kinder Morgan's shareholders, is expected to close in August.

The twinning of the 1,150-kilometre-long Trans Mountain pipeline between Strathcona County, near Edmonton, and Burnaby, B.C., will nearly triple its capacity to an estimated 890,000 barrels a day and increase traffic off B.C.'s coast from approximately five tankers to 34 tankers a month.




Liberals to buy Trans Mountain pipeline for $4.5B to ensure expansion is built

Canadian public could also incur millions to construct expansion project with estimated price tag of $7.4B

Kathleen Harris· CBC News· Posted: May 29, 2018 8:15 AM ET


Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced today the government is buying the Trans Mountain pipeline for $4.5 billion. (Chris Wattie/Reuters)



The Liberal government will buy the Trans Mountain pipeline and related infrastructure for $4.5 billion, and could spend billions more to build the controversial expansion.

Finance Minister Bill Morneau announced details of the agreement reached with Kinder Morgan at a news conference with Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr this morning, framing the short-term purchase agreement as financially sound and necessary to ensure a vital piece of energy infrastructure gets built.



Politics News
How much will the pipeline end up costing Canadians?
00:0008:23

 
'When it's in Canadians' advantage to know them...then of course that's going to be fully transparent,' says Bill Morneau. 8:23
"Make no mistake, this is an investment in Canada's future," Morneau said.

Morneau said the project is in the national interest, and proceeding with it will preserve jobs, reassure investors and get resources to world markets. He said he couldn't state exactly what additional costs will be incurred by the Canadian public to build the expansion, but suggested a toll paid by oil companies could offset some costs and that there would be a financial return on the investment.

Kinder Morgan had estimated the cost of building the expansion would be $7.4 billion, but Morneau insisted that the project will not have a fiscal impact, or "hit."


Politics News
Opposition MPs react to Trans Mountain purchase
00:0008:37

The Conservatives' Shannon Stubbs and the NDP's Jenny Kwan discuss the government's pipeline purchase. 8:37
He said the government does not intend to be a long-term owner, and at the appropriate time, the government will work with investors to transfer the project and related assets to a new owner or owners. Investors such as Indigenous groups and pension funds have already expressed interest, he said.
Until then, the project will proceed under the ownership of a Crown corporation. The agreement, which must still be approved by Kinder Morgan's shareholders, is expected to close in August.

A senior government official, speaking on background, said the government hopes to get a new commercial buyer for the pipeline by August, but if that doesn't happen, it will put up the $4.5 billion to purchase the assets.


Politics News
Morneau says government is buying Trans Mountain pipeline
00:0002:21

Finance Minister Bill Morneau explains the reasons behind the government's decision to buy the Trans Mountain pipeline for $4.5 billion. 2:21
The government won't publicly discuss construction cost for the expansion because it wants private companies to carry out their own assessments, then bid on the project, the official said.

Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer said today's decision does nothing to advance the project, since the legal questions and obstacles still remain. He said the government has failed to take action to ensure certainty around the expansion by resolving jurisdictional issues.

"This is a very, very sad day for Canada's energy sector. The message that is being sent to the world is that in order to get a big project build in this country, the federal government has to nationalize a huge aspect of it," he said.


Politics News
Scheer says Trans Mountain deal unnecessary
00:0000:53

Consevative Leader Andrew Scheer criticizes the governments decision to buy the Trans Mountain pipeline from Kinder Morgan. 0:53
NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh called it a "bad deal that will solve nothing." Pushing ahead with the pipeline betrays the government's promise to ease reliance on fossil fuels, he said.

"Climate change leaders don't spend $4.5 billion dollars on pipelines," he said. "We need a government with a vision that takes our future seriously."

The pipeline expansion project has faced intense opposition from the B.C. government, environmental activists and some Indigenous groups.


Politics News
Carr says Canadians can have a healthy planet and a strong economy
00:0001:48

Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr says that the Trans Mountain pipeline purchase can help Canadians achieve a clean environment and good jobs. 1:48
Carr said the plan does not sacrifice the environment for economic benefits.

"Canadians want both and we can have both," he said.

'Great economic benefits'


Kinder Morgan issued a statement that says the deal represents the best way forward for shareholders and Canadians.

"The outcome we have reached represents the best opportunity to complete Trans Mountain Expansion Project and thereby realize the great national economic benefits promised by that project," said chairman and CEO Steve Kean.
"Our Canadian employees and contractors have worked very hard to advance the project to this critical stage, and they will now resume work in executing this important Canadian project."

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May, who pleaded guilty Monday to criminal contempt for protesting the pipeline, tweeted that Kinder Morgan is "laughing all the way to the bank."

She called it a bad public policy decision that future generations will regret.

"Historically, I'm quite certain, this will go down as an epic financial, economic boondoggle that future students of political science will say, 'Why on earth did they do that? That made no sense,'" she said.


Politics News
May says Trans Mountain deal seems 'completely insane'
00:0001:13

Green Party Leader Elizabeth May says the decision to buy the Trans Mountain pipeline will go down in history as one of Canada's greatest epic, economical boondoggles. 1:13
Alberta Premier Rachel Notley called it "a major step forward for all Canadians." She believes any efforts to "harass" the project will have less effect with the federal government as the owner, because it will have Crown immunity in legal proceedings.

She said the pipeline remains a commercially viable project that will turn a profit. She conceded that governments could be on the hook if there is a spill, but said spills are becoming less frequent.

"Just like any project, there is risk. In this case, the risk is very low," she said.


Politics News
Alberta premier on feds' Trans Mountain purchase
00:0007:39



'I'm confident in recommending this to Albertans as a reasonable approach to getting this pipeline built,' says Rachel Notley. 7:39
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took to Twitter to praise the deal.

"Today, we've taken action to create and protect jobs in Alberta and B.C., and restart construction on the TMX pipeline expansion, a vital project in the national interest," his post says.

Under the arrangement, the government will indemnify a potential buyer for additional costs caused by provincial or municipal attempts to delay or obstruct the expansion. It also promises to underwrite costs if the proponent abandons the project because of an adverse judicial decision, or because it can't be completed by a predetermined date despite "commercially reasonable efforts."

Under either of those scenarios, the government will have the option to re-purchase the pipeline before the expansion is abandoned.

Bitter dispute


Notley has been locked in a bitter dispute over the pipeline with B.C. Premier John Horgan.

Today, Horgan said a change of ownership doesn't alter his concerns about the risk of a spill that could harm the coastal environment and said he'll proceed with a legal challenge.

"The good news is I think I have a better chance of progress with a Crown corporation and a government that is responsive to people rather than a company that is only responsive to its shareholders," he told CBC in Vancouver.

In a news conference, Horgan said the dispute should have been resolved through a joint reference to the Supreme Court.

"Now we have both Ottawa and Alberta, rather than going to court to determine jurisdiction, they're making financial decisions that affect taxpayers, and they'll have to be accountable for that."


The twinning of the 1,150-kilometre-long Trans Mountain pipeline will nearly triple its capacity to an estimated 890,000 barrels a day and increase traffic off B.C.'s coast from approximately five tankers to 34 tankers a month. (CBC News)
The federal government had looked at three options for moving the project forward:
  • compensating Kinder Morgan — or any other company — for financial losses caused by British Columbia's attempts to block the project;
  • buying and building the expansion itself, and then selling it once the work is complete, or;
  • buying the project from Kinder Morgan, then putting it on the market for investors willing to pick up the project and build it themselves.
Morneau's announcement comes just two days before a deadline that had been set by Kinder Morgan.

The company had said it needed clarity on a path forward for the project by May 31 or it would walk away from construction.

The original Trans Mountain pipeline was built in 1953. The expansion would be a twinning of the existing 1,150-kilometre pipeline between Strathcona County (near Edmonton), Alta., and Burnaby, B.C. It would add 980 kilometres of new pipeline and increase capacity from 300,000 barrels a day to 890,000 barrels a day.

According to Kinder Morgan's project website, the construction and the first 20 years of expanded operations would mean a combined government revenue of $46.7 billion, with $5.7 billion for B.C., $19.4 billion for Alberta and $21.6 billion for the rest of Canada.

With files from David Cochrane


Methinks everybody knows why I love the circus by now

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/gallant-government-report-card-1.4681647


Liberals grade themselves high on several election promises

The Gallant government gave themselves high marks despite leaving out some key financial commitments

Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: May 29, 2018 5:00 AM AT


38 Comments
 Commenting is now closed for this story.


Gerry Ferguson
Gerry Ferguson
I laughed while reading this article. Is this clown (Gallant) serious?????


David Amos
Page is closed to commenting.
 
@Gerry Ferguson Methinks everybody knows why I love the circus by now The Clowns make the show worth my two bits N'esy Pas?


Rosco holt
Brad Little
The only grade that comes to mind with this government is F.... 100% F'd


David Amos
David Amos
@Brad Little Methinks Mr Gallant and his cohorts facing a rough crowd come polling day if this comment section is any indication N'esy Pas?


Gerry Ferguson
Sterling Wright
This poor boy is totally out of touch with reality. Perhaps too much sampling at the pot facility he gave millions of our tax dollars to.


David Amos
David Amos
@Sterling Wright Methinks you sound a lot like a member of the PANB N'esy Pas?

 
Rosco holt
Archie Levesque
The Liberals are already in full fledged election mode. Running attack ads on the radio and now using our money to promote their ineptitude. At least most of the Atcon boys wont be back for another round.


Ray Bungay
Ray Bungay
@Archie Levesque I just hate American style attack ads. They serve no purpose!

David Amos
David Amos
@Archie Levesque YUP


Damian Gottfried 
Damian Gottfried
The liberals are being wiped out in ontario. And now are behind the conservatives federally.
That is the grade Canadians have given them.


Ray Bungay
Ray Bungay
@Damian Gottfried Don't forget Quebec, they are in trouble there as well!

David Amos
David Amos
@Ray Bungay Methinks Trudeau "The Younger" should never forget Quebec However Ontario will tell us quite a tale in short order. Its all over but the crying for the liberals if Ford wins and Carbon Tax goes out with the trash N'esy Pas?

  
Gerry Ferguson
Rosco holt
Of course they'll give themselves high marks, who wouldn't.
But they forgot to substact all the backdoor scheming like Parlee Beach, Extra-mural privatization, herbicide spraying, lobbying while sitting has an MLA, cutting question period and the rest we don't know of yet.


David Amos
David Amos
@Rosco holt Methinks the liberals forget nothing. They produce this nonsense in the faint hope that their fan base has a poor memory and can only recall the report card of their narcissistic boss on polling day N'esy Pas?
  

Rosco holt
Mario Doucet
Trudeau and Gallant are toast.


Rosco holt
Rosco holt
@Mario Doucet
The alternative maybe worst....

David Amos
David Amos
@Rosco holt TRUE

  
David Amos
David Amos
Wow don't I love the circus? Perhaps I should run again in "The Place To Be"

Methinks with Premier Brian Gallant is giving himself and his government high marks for keeping promises must have been the straw that broke his camel's back Brian MacDonald figured it was a good time to quit and go for a federal seat again N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/brian-macdonalds-quits-politics-1.4681380


Rosco holt
Rosco holt
@David Amos
Would anybody in his position give themselves a failing grade?

Most likely not.

David Amos
David Amos
@Rosco holt Methinks that it who take a narcissistic soul to dream up doing such a thing in the first place so of course he would rate himself highly N'esy Pas?


Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level

Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try federal politics


Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)

New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.

Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead jump into federal politics.
Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.

"It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my heart.

"I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis, I want to move on."



Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding will nominate their candidate June 28.

Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton. The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with national organizations that advocate for veterans.

"I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he said.
Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under Higgs.

Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of becoming a minister.

But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my options would be limited after that."

The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.

Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for Fredericton for the 2008 election.

After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.


Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the first ballot out of seven candidates.
Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.

"It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.



Liberals grade themselves high on several election promises

The Gallant government gave themselves high marks despite leaving out some key financial commitments

Robert Jones· CBC News· Posted: May 29, 2018 5:00 AM AT


New Brunswick Premier Brian Gallant gave himself and his government high marks on many commitments but left out key financial and job promises on the report card. (Stephen MacGillivray/Canadian Press)


New Brunswick Premier Brian Gallant is giving himself and his government high marks for keeping promises made during the 2014 election campaign — although the self-evaluation avoided grading some of the party's key financial commitments and generously assessed the successful completion of others.

"We are on track to fulfil 98 percent of the commitments we made in 2014 to New Brunswickers," said Gallant at a press event in Moncton on Monday.

"I think that demonstrates we work very hard in ensuring our commitments are going to be honoured."
Flanked by government-produced charts that delivered mostly a campaign-style message, Gallant presented an evaluation of 153 commitments the party claims it made in the 2014 Liberal election platform "Moving New Brunswick forward."

According to Gallant, 149 of those have either been kept or started, a success rate of 98 percent.

"We thought it was important going into the campaign season that we update you on where we were as a government in implementing the commitments we made to New Brunswickers in 2014," he said.


Gallant said 90 per cent of his government's promises were met, eight per cent were not yet met and two per cent were not met. (Robert Jones/CBC)
But not included in the evaluation were a number of financial commitments Liberals made in 2014.

In its platform, the party outlined six years of financial targets for itself, including eliminating the province's deficit by its fifth budget and generating a $111 million surplus in its sixth — neither of which is happening.

Job growth promises


In her latest budget speech, delivered in January, Finance Minister Cathy Rogers projected a $124 million deficit for a fifth Liberal budget, a $79 million deficit in a sixth and balanced finances not coming until budget seven.

That's significantly worse than what was proposed to voters in 2014 but did not count as a broken commitment in the party's self-evaluation because deficit promises weren't graded at all.

Also not graded were job creation numbers and a campaign promise that 5,000 would be generated in the first year of a Gallant government with a "guarantee" of 10,000 new jobs after four years,

Statistics Canada reports the province gained 2,800 jobs during the first 12 months of Gallant's government but only 800 more since then.

Liberals argue they did create the promised jobs, but employment losses in the private economy disguised their achievement. Either way, the issue does not appear in any form on the report card.

Generous grading 


Among commitments that do appear, grading was often generous.

For example, government credits itself with keeping a 2014 commitment to "explore opportunities to export NB Power's energy surplus" by creating a new electricity export corporation.

However, according to the utility, its exports have fallen by $160 million — more than 40 per cent — over the past four years.
Similarly, the report card says a number of promises to "make post-secondary education more affordable" were also kept, even though school actually became more expensive for thousands of students.

According to New Brunswick's public accounts, overall student aid declined $11.7 million in the fiscal year ending in March 2017, even with the introduction of free tuition for low income students, because of the cancellations of other programs.

Other supposed successes, like ensuring "the independence of medical officers of health" prompted animated debates inside and outside the legislature about whether that was the true effect of government reform.

Conservative MLA Bruce Fitch, who attended the report card event, gave it a failing grade.

"You can take every promise and argue back and forth for a long time (if it was kept)," said Fitch who claimed the press conference was Liberal Party, not New Brunswick government, business.

"They're using government resources to try and convince people to vote for them again," he said.
 

Strange that the former Speaker Andy Scheer didn't touch base with me when he was in my stomping grounds.

$
0
0
---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 17:11:35 +0000
Subject: RE: Strange that even the former Speaker Andy Scheer didn't
touch base with me when he was in my stomping grounds.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 13:11:22 -0400
Subject: Strange that even the former Speaker Andy Scheer didn't touch
base with me when he was in my stomping grounds.
To: billbrew@nb.sympatico.ca, news@radioabl.ca,
alaina.lockhart@parl.gc.ca, pwhite@nbnet.nb.ca, news
<news@kingscorecord.com>, news <news@hilltimes.com>,
brad.trost@parl.gc.ca, "deepak.obhrai"<deepak.obhrai@parl.gc.ca>,
"Matt.DeCourcey"<Matt.DeCourcey@parl.gc.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"
<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
>, "dominic.leblanc"
<dominic.leblanc@parl.gc.ca>, dleblanc <dleblanc@globeandmail.com>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, sfine <sfine@globeandmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
"hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>

He must have forgot my lawsuit N'esy Pas Dominic Leblanc?

http://www.thewave.ca/news/1047158775/tory-fundy-royal-nomination-process-slammed

Tory Fundy Royal Nomination Process Slammed
Posted on Friday, March 9, 2018 14:27 PM

A 'closed door affair' is how a retail manager from Quispamsis
characterizes the federal Conservative nomination process for the
riding of Fundy Royal.

https://www.facebook.com/BelyeasCoveCommunityHall/posts/1005550386188834

Bill Brewer :
12 Lyden Dr ,
Quispamsis, NB
Telephone: (506) 654-0708
E-mail: billbrew@nb.sympatico.ca


http://pcnb.ca/events/fundy-royal-conservative-association-annual-dinner/

Fundy Royal Conservative Association Annual Dinner

May 12th, 2018
Sussex Golf Club
Meet and Greet 4:30pm
Dinner 5:00pm
Speaker – Andrew Scheer
Tickets – Don Jenkins 333-0598

President Peter White 832-3404

White, Peter J. C., Law Office
936 Main St.
PO Box 1098, Stn. Main
Hampton, New Brunswick E5N 8H1
Phone: 506-832-3403
Fax: 506-832-3640
Email: pwhite@nbnet.nb.ca


---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 12:07:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Andy Scheer anf Petey MacKay this should
put your sneaky buddies on and even keel with Karen Ludwig before June
7th N'esy Pas Dominic Cardy?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 08:07:06 -0400
Subject: Yo Andy Scheer anf Petey MacKay this should put your sneaky
buddies on and even keel with Karen Ludwig before June 7th N'esy Pas
Dominic Cardy?
To: votejohnw@gmail.com, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.com>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "PETER.MACKAY"
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>, "Dominic.Cardy"
<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Karen.Ludwig"
<Karen.Ludwig@parl.gc.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "steve.murphy"
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/brian-macdonalds-quits-politics-1.4681380

Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level
Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try
federal politics
CBC News · Posted: May 28, 2018 6:07 PM AT

"Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative
nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the
riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA."

Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for
years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister
Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for
Fredericton for the 2008 election.

After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in
Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in
the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he
defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.



> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice

On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL



http://www.thewave.ca/news/1047158775/tory-fundy-royal-nomination-process-slammed

Tory Fundy Royal Nomination Process Slammed
Posted on Friday, March 9, 2018 14:27 PM

A 'closed door affair' is how a retail manager from Quispamsis
characterizes the federal Conservative nomination process for the
riding of Fundy Royal.

We reported this week that former cabinet minister in the Harper
government and longtime MP in the riding Rob Moore had been acclaimed
for the 2019 election.
38-year-old Bill Brewer ran provincially for the People's Alliance in
Albert during the 2014 election and says he was interested in throwing
his hat into the Fundy Royal ring but is slamming 'restrictive
constraints' including what he's calling a lack of advertisement.

"There were no phone calls, no standard mail sent and no written
advertisement in the one newspaper that is solely based in the Fundy
Royal boundaries," Brewer says.

He tells CHSJ News he's left with unanswered questions.

"I do firmly believe that Rob [Moore] was the choice candidate. He's
been a party spokesperson since shortly after he lost his seat in the
last election. He's been given a public profile by the party, so I
believe this was the intention all along to give it back to Rob," says
Brewer.

"I'm not soured by it, but I am disappointed by it."

Brewer is looking for federal Conservative leader Andrew Scheer to
re-open this nomination.

President of the Fundy Royal Conservative Association Peter White tell
CHSJ the procedure is openly stated on the party website and members
are given notice. He also says for anyone interested in running for
the nomination, the process is very open allowing them to be diligent
in following through with that desire before any nomination is
formally called.

https://www.telegraphjournal.com/telegraph-journal/story/100532708/

Nomination process questioned as former MP acclaimed as candidate

ADAM HURAS Parliament Hill  March 7, 2018

OTTAWA • Rob Moore has been acclaimed as the Conservative candidate in
the riding of Fundy Royal, kicking off a bid to regain the federal
seat he lost in the Trudeau sweep of New Brunswick in 2015.

But a man interested in running against Moore for the riding
nomination says he’s bewildered that the party had already closed
nominations more than 20 months ahead of the next expected federal
election.

The party maintains it followed its own rules and is ramping up well
in advance of the next federal vote.

Conservative members of the riding association in the province’s
southeast were informed Tuesday that Moore had been acclaimed as their
candidate for the election scheduled to be held in October 2019.

But Bill Brewer, a 38-year-old retail manager from Quispamsis who
represented the People's Alliance in the riding of Albert in the 2014
provincial election, has now stepped forward to say that he wanted a
shot at carrying the Conservative banner in the riding of Fundy Royal.

He believes he wasn’t afforded the chance.

“It seems as if the Conservative Party of Canada was more interested
in slanting the nomination in Fundy Royal to favour one candidate than
show interest in engaging its grassroots members in the process,”
Brewer said.

“There were no phone calls, no standard mail sent and no written
advertisement in the newspaper that is solely based in the Fundy Royal
boundaries.”

Moore, party leader Andrew Scheer’s critic for Atlantic Canada, is the
first Conservative candidate announced in New Brunswick.

In an interview Wednesday, Moore said that he was “fully prepared” to
face a contested nomination but that the rules were followed and he
was the only candidate to step forward.

“I’m very pleased to be acclaimed and to be the candidate again.”

 Just last month, Moore criticized a rule change by the federal
Liberals that could see party incumbents automatically acclaimed
without open nominations.

He said open run-offs are the most fair and democratic way of going
about it, even though it will see some of its biggest names face
contentious battles in the months ahead.

Moore reiterated Wednesday the party has seen contested nominations.

Seven seats have been challenged in advance of the 2019 election.

They include some higher-profile party names, including Brad Trost,
who finished fourth in last May's leadership race, and Deepak Obhrai,
who also lost in the run-off for party leader.

Moore said the party has put together a national plan that gives the
party the best chance to win the next election, with getting
candidates nominated and out working in key ridings being an important
part.

The party’s executive director has discretion on when to open a nomination.

A nomination deadline was set by the party for Feb. 1.

An email was sent by the party’s national executive director on Jan.
18 giving current party members 14 days' notice, the minimum
requirement, to submit a nomination application.

“The rules were followed, but it was the bare minimum,” Brewer said.
“But the rules don’t make it easy for people to participate.”

He has asked the party to reopen the nomination and allow for a longer
period to sign up new members, in hopes of a contested nomination.

“Contested nominations are the best way to grow the party in between
elections and get local citizens interested in participating in the
process. There appeared to be no interest from the party to grow the
membership and engage the current members of Fundy Royal.”



https://www.telegraphjournal.com/telegraph-journal/story/100508087/federal-election-mps?source=story-related


N.B.’s federal Liberals may be acclaimed
ADAM HURAS Parliament Hill  February 11, 2018

OTTAWA • All 10 sitting New Brunswick MPs could be acclaimed as
candidates for the 2019 election without the fear of being contested
for the job.

The federal Liberals unveiled new rules to protect incumbents from
nomination challenges earlier this month.

They arguably mean more here in Atlantic Canada where a Justin
Trudeau-led team swept all 32 seats in the region.

It’s a decision the province’s slate of federal Liberal politicians
say will ready them for the election runoff, making them even tougher
to defeat at the polls next time around.

Meanwhile, the federal Conservatives maintain that open nominations
are the most fair and democratic way of going about it, even though it
will see some of its biggest names face contentious battles in the
months ahead.

“I think it offers an opportunity for MPs to kind of knuckle down
early and make calls, do door knocking and fundraising to get ready
for the next election,” Saint John Rothesay MP Wayne Long said in an
interview. “We’re literally one year and three months out from the
election season.

“There’s a lot of work to do in all of the ridings, and I think this
little incentive helps MPs get prepared for the upcoming battle.”

Under new rules, incumbents who have a healthy war chest and a strong
riding ground game won’t have to win an open nomination contest.

MPs will automatically get to carry the Liberal banner into the next
election if they meet certain thresholds, including knocking on at
least 3,500 doors or made 5,000 phone calls and raising money
amounting to at least half of the riding’s anticipated election
expenses.

They also must sign up at least 30 new people to donate monthly to the
party and need signatures of support from at least 150 registered
Liberals in the riding and the approval of the national campaign
chairperson.

They’re conditions that arguably set them up for election success.

But Long said it’s not a guarantee all 10 MPs will be able to hit those targets.

“I don’t think that’s going to be the case. It’s just a little carrot
for people who are super organized.

“I view it as a positive thing. If MPs have their house in order that
it’s a little extra incentive for them. The bar is pretty high,
there’s a lot of work for a lot of MPs to meet that bar, but it’s a
little bit of an incentive for people to get going and be prepared.”

 Fredericton MP Matt DeCourcey would only say that he will keep doing
what he’s doing, “knocking on doors and calling people in the riding,
preparing myself to continue to do the job that I love to do.”

Meanwhile, Miramichi-Grand Lake MP Pat Finnigan said in an interview
said he will now have to work even harder.

“But I think that’s good because it means I will be have to call and
meet my constituents and that’s never a bad thing.”

There is an obstacle that stands in the way for New Brunswick MPs specifically.

The next New Brunswick election is slated for later this year – Sept.
24, 2018 – and the provincial and federal branch of the party largely
share campaign staff and volunteers, which may affect some MPs from
hitting the targets.

“I think it’s obtainable,” Finnigan said of the criteria’s threshold.
“The only thing that kind of works against us is the provincial
election.

“We’re trying not to get in their way.”

Federal Conservative spokesman Cory Hann said that its party’s
nominations are open regardless of it being a held or unheld seat.
Seven seats have been challenged in advance of the 2019 election.

They include some higher-profile party names, including Brad Trost,
who finished fourth in last May’s leadership race, and Deepak Obhrai,
who also lost in the runoff for party leader.

Ontario MP Kellie Leitch was also to face a nomination challenge but
has since announced she won’t seek reelection.

“We have a system where every member of every riding gets an
opportunity to decide who their candidate is going to be in the next
election and yes, that has led to some of our MPs being challenged,”
Former Conservative MP for Fundy Royal and Conservative critic for
Atlantic Canada Rob Moore said in an interview. “Obviously, our party
prefers the more open, more democratic process, but that’s a choice
they made.

“Having an open nomination allows individual party members to have a
say as to who their candidate is going to be, while guaranteeing the
nomination means the local association doesn’t have a say.

“We’ll see how it plays out.”



https://www.facebook.com/johnwilliamsonNB/photos/a.848901995163272.1073741826.172576949462450/1765074580212671/?type=3

John Williamson - Conservative Nomination Candidate New Brunswick Southwest
May 17 at 12:48pm ·

Great news! John Williamson is running for the federal Conservative
nomination in New Brunswick Southwest. He needs your help to secure
the riding and defeat the Trudeau Liberals in 2019.

Having served as Member of Parliament from 2011-2015, he knows the
issues, has proven ability, and can win: John had the highest
Conservative vote — 38.6% — of all 32 ridings in Atlantic Canada in
2015. It wasn’t enough to get over the top, but it was a clear signal
that his local campaign was strong.

How can you help? Only current Conservative Party members can vote for
John in the nomination, so please signup or renew your membership
here: https://donate.conservative.ca/membership/

There are also envelopes that need stuffing, phone calls that need to
be made, and events already planned.

Contact John today by e-mail at VoteJohnW@gmail.com or call
506-466-8347 to let him know how you can help!

Unsure if your membership is current? Feel free to contact John and
ask. His team can make sure you’re all set to vote.

And be sure to share and follow this page for updates on his campaign
and to learn about upcoming events.

Go John! And Vote John W!


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/brian-macdonalds-quits-politics-1.4681380



Progressive Conservative MLA calls it quits at provincial level

Brian Macdonald won't run again for legislature seat, but might try federal politics

Brian Macdonald, a Progressive Conservative MLA, has announced he won't run in the Sept. 24 provincial election. (CBC)

New Brunswick's Progressive Conservative party is losing one of its highest-profile MLAs just months before the next provincial election.

Brian Macdonald says he won't be a candidate this fall and may instead jump into federal politics.
Calling the last year "my best year in politics," the two-term MLA said his decision has nothing to do with PC Leader Blaine Higgs, who beat Macdonald for the party leadership in 2016.

"It's been a really good year," Macdonald said. "I've had a strong voice in the legislature on issues that are really important to my heart.

"I also think it can be a challenge being in provincial politics. It's very small, it's very close, it's very tight, and on a personal basis, I want to move on."


Macdonald says he’s considering running for the federal Conservative nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, which includes part of the riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell, where he has been the MLA. (CBC)
Macdonald said he's considering running for the federal Conservative nomination in New Brunswick Southwest, a constituency that includes part of Macdonald's provincial riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell.
That decision would pit him against former Conservative MP John Williamson, who announced May 21 he'll also seek the nomination in the riding he represented from 2011 to 2015. Party members in the riding will nominate their candidate June 28.

Macdonald said he'll also consider running federally in Fredericton. The former soldier said he's also looking at job opportunities with national organizations that advocate for veterans.

"I'm looking for opportunities and considering a lot of options," he said.
Macdonald is the fifth candidate from the 2016 provincial PC leadership race to opt against running in this year's election under Higgs.

Macdonald said he is confident he would have won his riding again and the Tories will win the election Sept. 24, meaning he'd have a shot of becoming a minister.

But he said being a provincial politician "does wear on you and it does make you think about what the other options are. … If I go another four years in provincial politics, it concerns me that my options would be limited after that."

The 47-year-old also said the recent death of some friends made him realize he should pursue other opportunities when he can.

Macdonald's interest in federal politics has been well-known for years. He was a political assistant to former federal Defence Minister Peter MacKay and sought the federal Conservative nomination for Fredericton for the 2008 election.

After failing to win that nomination, he ran provincially in Fredericton-Silverwood in 2010 and was elected. He was re-elected in the newly created riding of Fredericton West-Hanwell in 2014, when he defeated then-NDP leader Dominic Cardy.

Macdonald ran for the leadership of the New Brunswick Progressive Conservative Party but lost to Blaine Higgs. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)
In 2016, Macdonald ran for the PC leadership, placing sixth on the first ballot out of seven candidates.
Macdonald said he doesn't think his departure will hurt the provincial party's chances of holding on to Fredericton West-Hanwell.

"It's going to be very attractive to a number of high-calibre candidates who are now beginning to come forward," he said.

A nasty Lady said "Kory Teneycke is running Doug Ford's campaign. Remember him? Enough said."

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ford-pcs-platform-cost-fiscal-1.4684590


Doug Ford's PCs reveal 'final' campaign platform that has no fiscal outlook

Ford campaign spokesperson says no further financial details are coming before June 7



748 Comments


Peter Stemkowski 
Peter Stemkowski
And this is the party that scoffs at the NDP as inept? Seriously?


Tony Hill
Tony Hill
@Peter Stemkowski

The sad thing is that the NDP are inept, but they might be the least inept of three parties. Other than a few extreme partisans I think most people looking at the Ontario NDP in isolation would state that this group has absolutely no business forming government.

Unfortunately if one were to look at the Ontario Liberals they almost all say that this group has absolutely no business remaining as the government, and if they were to look at the PCs, and particularly Doug Ford, they would say that this group and individual have absolutely no business forming government or being premier.

Elections often end up with a set of poor options to choose from, but this Ontario election is setting an all-time low for the abysmal quality of all candidates on offer.

David Amos
David Amos
@Tony Hill Methinks you must have overlooked the election south of the 49th in 2016 The Yankees elected some dude they call the "The Donald" as Prez and he talked a lot like Ford does N'esy Pas?



james fryday 
james fryday
Ford's got a platform alright. It's called "do what I want". Trumpian I'd say.


Lee Hall
Lee Hall
@David Amos <--- a="" br="" canada="" canadians="" due="" economy.="" gift="" harper="" his="" in="" inept="" made="" of="" parting="" recession="" running="" s="" the="" to="" was="">
Plus,one of the longest election periods in Canadian history that cost Canadian taxpayers over $400 Million. As he tried to outspend his opponents.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/elections-canada-443-million-1.3436139--->

David Amos
David Amos
@Lee Hall Methinks you have no idea who I am because CBC didn't tell you that I ran in five elections N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276


Don Luft 
Don Luft
Ford calls the NDP "radical". Well I suppose from where Ford is standing that might be the perception but for 2/3 of the electorate the radical is Ford.

I'm not surprised Ford hasn't put forth a fully costed program but rails against the NDP and Liberals who have. I expect the reason his party has refused to show where the money is coming from is because the promises can't be reconciled with reality. Spending billions amidst tax cuts and saying you're going to reduce the deficit is ludicrous. The only way he can do it is the way his brother kept a similar promise for Toronto. He slashed budgets across the board leaving essential services under funded.

Like his idol Trump, Ford will come face to face with reality and discover its easier to promise contradictory goals than deliver them.


David Amos
David Amos
@Don Luft "2/3 of the electorate the radical is Ford"

Methinks you may be mistaken N'esy Pas?

SURVEY SAYS?

https://newsinteractives.cbc.ca/onvotes/poll-tracker/

Probability of the Progressive Conservatives winning a majority 71.9%

Probability of the Progressive Conservatives winning the most seats but not a majority 11.6%

Probability of the NDP winning a majority 9.2%

Probability of the NDP winning the most seats but not a majority 6.1%

Don Luft
Don Luft 
@David Amos

I don't know what you're point is. The number of seats doesn't reflect voter support. We've had lots of majority governments without majority support. This time we might get a majority government from a party that polls even fewer votes than second place finisher in terms of seats.

That 2/3 reference was because the PCs are polling around 34-35% right now so almost 2/3 of the electorate support left leaning parties. The difference in policies between the Greens, NDP and Liberal aren't enough that anyone attracted to any of those parties would consider the others radical. The Conservatives by comparison are way out in right field compared to the other parties who would likely see the PCs as radical.



james fryday 
Jim Graham
Typical Con ... taking it for granted they can ride the wave of anger to power. Wrong.

Doug Ford is not prepared to be honest or accountable to voters ... Donald Trump without the weird behaviour. Cons used to speak of someone not being ready ... well, Doug Ford is living their dream.

What a betrayal of public trust. His word cannot be trusted. Fiscal conservatives can find a more comfortable safe place with the Libs until this Ford nightmare passes on by..


Joe Godin
Joe Godin
@Jim Graham

The Libs ARE dead. Period, point finale.

Don't be surprised that if they are eliminated from official party status. But then again, if you have no elected members, OPS is a moot point...

David Amos
David Amos
@Joe Godin Methinks the most fun outcome of this circus would be a PC minority mandate. I doubt that Ford would have a tough time making a deal with what was left of the liberals N'esy Pas?



 james fryday 
David Fraser
Look at a picture of Doug Ford and ask yourself the question, "Would I buy a used car from this man?" if the answer is no, then you might want to think twice about putting him in charge of a used province. Especially considering that the written warranty he is offering with the car now boils down to "Trust me".

Mr Ford and his party are showing disrespect for the citizens of this province. They do not deserve our trust.


David Amos
David Amos
@David Fraser Methinks there once was a man named Ford who sold a lots of cars because folks trusted him. On the other hand there once was punk named Ford who shot Jesse James in the back because he mistakenly trusted him Moral of my story? I doubt if Ford can be trusted but I know for certain that I wouldn't trust the other two wannabe Premiers Confusing N'esy Pas?


 james fryday 
Ronald Clayton
Mr Ford is not a viable candidate. He lacks honesty, intelligence and a proven track record. Just a waste of time and a waste of a vote.


Margaret Bricknell
Margaret Bricknell
@Sue Northfield
Kory Teneycke is running his campaign. Remember him?
Enough said.

David Amos
David Amos
@Margaret Bricknell "Kory Teneycke is running his campaign. Remember him?"

Methinks you know why I remember him very well N'esy Pas?


james fryday 
Wayne Reid
Makes me scared. Doug Ford thinks health care here in Ontario should be like the states. pay for your own. I can take a real good guess where he will find some of the money he needs. Never heard one word from him on health care that eased my mind.

Also scares me greatly when they sneak their plan onto the web site and only say what they want to do. No mention of how they will pay for it or what he plans to cut. To sneaking and information lacking for me. My vote will be going else where.


bill chagwich
bill chagwich
@Wayne Reid sneak on the web, now that's scary, the web is open to each and everyone last time I was on it, false info again
David Amos
David Amos
@bill chagwich Methinks what you say is is largely true However one can find lots of false info about yours truly on the Internet N'esy Pas?

Pat Kenny 
Pat Kenny
So, how many would buy a vehicle after being told by the shady seller that you aren't allowed to look under the hood until after you buy it? Pfffttt...


David Amos
David Amos
@Pat Kenny "you aren't allowed to look under the hood"

Methinks you should credit your NDP leader with those words N'esy Pas?



james fryday 
Robert Morris
There is no such thing as a fiscally prudent con.


Robert Morris
Robert Morris
@Margaret Bricknell
Tommy Douglas was premier of Saskatchewan from 1944 to 1961. How old were you when he left in 1961??

Patrick Smyth
Patrick Smyth
@Robert Morris Does one need to have been alive then to speak of it?

David Amos
David Amos
@Patrick Smyth Methinks most religious folks would think that you asked a very dumb question N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Morris I was nine How about you?


 Pat Kenny
Pat Kenny
Who hides from all reporters and then hires his own phony reporter? Who hires actors to pretend they like him? Who wants you to buy a house without even being allowed to look inside it first?

Ronald McCallum
Ronald McCallum
@bill chagwich

"@Pat Kenny waiting for those false links, hmmm waiting, waiting"

HERE are the "so-called false links" for you Bill.

Pat said the following:

FIRST: "Who hires actors to pretend they like him?"

CBC News story on the 8th of May 2018: "Doug Ford looking into why actors were hired as PC supporters at Ontario leaders' debate": http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-debate-protesters-1.4653301

CBC News story on the 9th of May 2018: "Ontario PCs not parting ways with Toronto Centre candidate after actors hired to play Ford supporters": http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/meredith-cartwright-toronto-centre-1.4655893

SECOND: "Who wants you to buy a house without even being allowed to look inside it first?"

Link to the Progressive Conservatives' Platform sans costing

https://www.ontariopc.ca/plan_for_the_people« less

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Pat Kenny Methinks two dudes who went on a blind date last year both fit the bill N'esy Pas?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zs1PT44aWg

Jagmeet Singh and Doug Ford go on a Political Blind Date
9,821 views
Toronto Star
Published on Nov 15, 2017

David Amos
David Amos
@Pat Kenny Methinks it is rather interesting that CBC blocked my reply to you referring to the Toronto Star's report on Jagmeet Singh and Doug Ford N'esy Pas?


Doug Ford's PCs reveal 'final' campaign platform that has no fiscal outlook

Ford campaign spokesperson says no further financial details are coming before June 7


Following relentless criticism from his rivals, PC Leader Doug Ford and his team posted a campaign platform overnight that does not include a fiscal outlook or any details of how the PCs would pay for their promises. (Geoff Robins/Canadian Press)



After months of promising to release a fully costed campaign platform, the Progressive Conservatives have published an online list of promises that doesn't include a detailed fiscal plan.

Overnight on Tuesday, the PCs quietly revised their campaign website to include "For The People: A Plan for Ontario."

In the document, the PCs reiterate a number of promises already laid out by their leader, Doug Ford, including a pledge to cut taxes for the middle income bracket and businesses, reduce the price of gasoline by 10 cents per litre. They also promise hundreds of millions of dollars for various infrastructure projects.
The plan reveals how much each commitment is expected to cost, but makes no mention of the at least $6 billion of "efficiencies" Ford has previously said a PC government would find. It also makes no mention of when a PC government would balance the province's budget.

Politics News
P&P's Ontario election panel debates Ford's 'Plan for Ontario' website
00:0010:26
Rob Silver, Olivia Chow, and Kate Harrison break down the latest Ontario election news. 10:26
 
 
When asked whether the document was the party's final plan, Ford's spokeswoman Melissa Lantsman said in an email: "Correct. This is our plan. Costing of each promise included.

"We've been talking about our plan every day and it's all there in one spot to show Ontario voters the stark choice between a responsible and modest spending of a PC government and a radical NDP who will be disastrous for the people of Ontario," she said.

Ontario NDP Leader Andrea Horwath has said that the PCs are disrepecting voters by not publishing a fully costed campaign platform. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)
 
 
"We are going to balance the budget in a responsible way."

Ford and his campaign team have repeatedly promised to publish a fully costed platform before election day. Back in March, when the Liberals released their 2018 budget — which formed the backbone of their own platform  — Ford criticized the Liberals for putting forward figures he characterized as shoddy.
"We have 71 days left in this election. That's more than enough time to unveil our platform," Ford said then.

"And we have a solid platform that is fully costed. That's the difference. Ours will be fully costed, theirs isn't fully costed."

Ford has frequently touted his business experience on the campaign trail and his dedication to fiscal responsibility. During the last televised leaders' debate earlier this week, NDP Leader Andrea Horwath said Ford was disrespecting voters by failing to publish a costed platform.

Both Horwath and Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne heaped scorn on the notion that Ford had released a full plan Wednesday.

Ontario Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne says there are billions of dollars in spending unaccounted for in the PC plan. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)
 
 
"Look: This is not a fully costed plan, it's not coherent," Wynne said at a stop in Markham, Ont., where she pushed her government's transit record. "All of the things that Doug Ford has said would add up to a $40-billion hole and they have no idea how they would find that."

Horwath was equally incredulous, saying it wasn't good enough for Ford to write a "list of things he might do and put it on the internet."

People should know what Ford's plans are, what he's going to cut and what services might be at risk, the NDP leader said.

"His list of things-to-do that he put on his website is not going to help people to decide which way to vote and what's their best interest in this campaign," Horwath said.

"What's worrisome is we have a leader who's trying to take the chair of the premier in this province and he's not being honest with people."

Perhaps folks should read paragraph 83 of my lawsuit against the Crown real slow and ask Jean Chrétien about it ASAP N'esy Pas?

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/thecurrent/the-current-for-may-31-2018-1.4684322/trump-and-the-trans-mountain-pipeline-what-would-jean-chr%C3%A9tien-do-1.4684328


Trump and the Trans Mountain pipeline: What would Jean Chrétien do?

It would be silly not to take advantage of our natural resources, former PM tells CBC's The Current

Former prime minister Jean Chrétien is pictured in Ottawa in March 2017. The Trans Mountain pipeline debate is not a crisis of national unity, he says. (Justin Tang/Canadian Press)



Former prime minister Jean Chrétien predicts that NAFTA will survive, despite U.S. President Donald Trump's assertion that it is "the worst trade deal ever made."

"You cannot undo an omelette," he told The Current's Anna Maria Tremonti. Chrétien said the U.S. and Canada are too dependent on each other for trade for the deal to be scrapped.

Negotiating old deals is nothing new, he said, but "the Americans are big and slow, and we're small and fast."

The deal will have to be modified, he said, but even if Canada agreed to minor changes, to "change one comma, Mr. Trump would say it is the biggest historic victory that America ever had.
"And we [should] say 'Yes, sir, Monsieur Trump,'" he said.

Negotiations for a new version of the deal stalled after high-level talks broke off earlier this month. Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland arrived in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday in hopes of rekindling the discussion.

Chrétien said he would not have voted for Trump, but Americans did, and "that's democracy, you live with that."

"It's an American problem, it's not a Canadian problem."

If Chrétien met the U.S. president now, he knows what he would say.
"Bonjour — and he won't understand."

  • The former prime minister at Game 2 of the 2007 Stanley Cup Final, between the Anaheim Ducks and the Ottawa Senators, in Ottawa. (Dave Sandford/Getty Images)
 

Ignore the pipeline pundits


Chrétien made the comments in a wide-ranging interview on The Current, while discussing a new documentary, The Man. The Story. Jean Chrétien: In His Own Words, that charts his rise to power and 40-year political career.

Despite leaving office 15 years ago, he had plenty to say about the issues affecting Canada today, including the Trans Mountain pipeline row. Calling the fight a threat to national unity is overblown, he said.


"I don't think it will break the country, come on, don't exaggerate that way," he told Tremonti.
"Here we have two NDP governments — that's my fun to watch it — fighting. They tear off their shirts and so on for this problem."

He said he wasn't interested in the characterization of the debate as a crisis, or the pundits pushing it.
"If I had listened to all the pundits during all my life I would have been a very miserable person. And look how joyful I am still today," he quipped.

A protester holds a photo of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau covered in oil during a protest against the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion in Vancouver on May 29, 2018. (Darryl Dyck/Canadian Press)
 
 
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Liberal government announced on Tuesday that it would commit $4.5 billion to buying the pipeline from Kinder Morgan. The pipeline's expansion has been opposed by B.C. Premier John Horgan, some Indigenous groups and high-profile environmentalists, including Green Party Leader Elizabeth May. It has been championed by Alberta NDP Premier Rachel Notley.
Chrétien argued that it would be a mistake for Canada not to take advantage of its oil and gas reserves with a pipeline.

"Will we be silly enough, having these resources, not to sell it?" he asked Tremonti.

"They will burn oil elsewhere, that will come from Venezuela and Saudi Arabia, and so on. And we will not have the money of that wealth."
If they throw you out, politics is over, and your wife is happy.- Jean  Chrétien
Chrétien, who served as prime minister with the Liberals from 1993 to 2003, noted that there was support for the pipeline in B.C., with a recent poll suggesting more than half of British Columbians support the expansion.

However, "the poor premier has made a deal with the Greens," he said, referring to Horgan, and is afraid of losing their votes.
In political life, he said, it's important to listen, to take action, and to do what you think is right.
"When you're satisfied in your mind, and in your heart, that you're right, you do it and trust the judgment of the people.

"And if they throw you out, politics is over, and your wife is happy."

The two-part documentary, The Man. The Story. Jean Chrétien: In His Own Words, will air on the CBC Documentary Channel on June 2 and June 9, at 7 p.m. ET.

Listen to the full conversation near the top of this page.


Written by Padraig Moran with files from CBC News. This segment was produced by The Current's Idella Sturino.






82 Comments


David Amos
David Amos
Methinks somebody should check out my Twitter account ASAP I am not shy either N'esy Pas?

Out of the gate today CBC and their buddies in VIAFOURA proved my point in spades about just how crooked they are N'esy Pas?

$
0
0
---------- Original message ----------
From: Ontario Liberal Party <info@ontarioliberal.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 18:04:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Wynne Biting the political bullet After
reading enough in CBC I called a lot of you people yesterday and
nobody gave a damn Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Ontario Liberal Party.

We will endeavour to get back to you as soon as possible.

For media enquiries, please contact us at communications@ontarioliberal.ca.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact us.

Sincerely,

The Ontario Liberal Party Team


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 14:04:11 -0400
Subject: Re Wynne Biting the political bullet After reading enough in
CBC I called a lot of you people yesterday and nobody gave a damn
Correct?
To: communications@ontarioliberal.ca, info@jessspindler.ca,
info@ontarioliberal.ca, leccecampaign@gmail.com, info@romanbaber.ca,
paul@calandra.ca, gurratan.singh@ontariondp.ca, Helena@votehelena.ca,
marilynkingvaughan@gmail.com, andrea4yorkcentre@gmail.com,
info@voteramon.ca, votejoanndavis@gmail.com,
jessica.bell@ontariondp.ca, Outreach@gilliansmith.ca,
jill.andrew@ontariondp.ca, dwayne.morgan@ontariondp.ca,
info@chinlee.ca, zeyd.bismilla@ontariondp.ca, nadia@nadiaguerrera.ca,
bhutila.karpoche@ontariondp.ca
, info@voteqaadri.ca,
support@votedenzil.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, news@nowtoronto.com,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/biting-the-political-bullet-wynne-clears-path-for-liberals-to-campaign-out-of-her-shadow-1.4689343

Biting the political bullet, Wynne clears path for Liberals to
campaign out of her shadow
Admission of defeat widely seen as a Hail Mary for Liberals to win
enough seats to keep party status
CBC News · Posted: Jun 02, 2018 5:10 PM ET

Ontario Election 2018: 16 make-or-break races in the 416 and 905

It’s in seat-rich Toronto and the 905 that Ontario Election 2018 will
be won or lost on June 7. Here's a look inside the closest races in
the GTA.
by Enzo DiMatteo May 31, 2018

https://nowtoronto.com/news/ontario-election-416-905-ridings/

https://nowtoronto.com/news/ontario-election-10-ridings-to-watch-in-toronto/

https://nowtoronto.com/news/Ontario-Election-10-ridings-to-watch-in-the-905/

Enzo DiMatteo
EDITORIAL DIRECTOR

Enzo was born in Belgium and emigrated with his family to Canada in
the heat of Trudeaumania. He grew up in the city’s west end and cut
his teeth in journalism in the 90s covering cop stories and whatever
madness skinheads in the neo-Nazi movement were up to. He is a winner
of numerous writing awards and the only (alleged) Commie banned from
entering Cuba. It’s complicated. Claims to fame: champion
wood-chopper.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/06/out-of-gate-today-cbc-and-buddies-in.html

Saturday, 2 June 2018
Out of the gate today CBC and their buddies in VIAFOURA proved my
point in spades about just how crooked they are N'esy Pas?



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:33:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Premier Wynne or the record Joel Harden
of the NDP was the only plitcal animal to respond to my emails Tweets
and phone calls but obviously did so only to hustle me
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier


Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,


Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario


Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:33:46 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Premier Wynne or the record Joel Harden of the NDP was
the only plitcal animal to respond to my emails Tweets and phone calls
but obviously did so only to hustle me
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:33:42 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Premier Wynne or the record Joel Harden
of the NDP was the only plitcal animal to respond to my emails Tweets
and phone calls but obviously did so only to hustle me
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.

This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.

To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.

Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca
> or call 613-957-4222.

Thank you

-------------------

Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.

Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.

Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.

Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.

Merci




---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:33:44 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Premier Wynne or the record Joel Harden
of the NDP was the only plitcal animal to respond to my emails Tweets
and phone calls but obviously did so only to hustle me
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>

Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com

This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 12:33:37 -0400
Subject: Yo Premier Wynne or the record Joel Harden of the NDP was the
only plitcal animal to respond to my emails Tweets and phone calls but
obviously did so only to hustle me
To: premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
joel@joelharden.ca, cheriewong@gpo.ca, vgartner70@gmail.com, jesse
<jesse@viafoura.com>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, "jessica.hume"
<jessica.hume@ontario.ca>, doug <doug@fordnation.ca>,
yasir.naqvi@ontario.ca, warren@daisygroup.ca,
colinapritchard@gmail.com, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, ombuds@uottawa.ca,
recteur@uottawa.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
<gopublic@cbc.ca>, Eric.Grenier@cbc.ca, "sylvie.gadoury"
<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Melanie.Joly"
<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca

Clearly Harden ignored everything else and no doubt this blog as well N'esy Pas?

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/06/out-of-gate-today-cbc-and-buddies-in.html

Saturday, 2 June 2018

Out of the gate today CBC and their buddies in VIAFOURA proved my
point in spades about just how crooked they are N'esy Pas?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Joel Harden - Ottawa Centre NDP <joel@joelharden.ca>
Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2018 12:00:32 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Final Sprint to E-Day/Sprint final jusqu'à l'élection
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Hey David,

You must have heard about Kathleen Wynne's election concession
yesterday. By asking Ontario voters to elect a minority government,
Wynne is asking to hold onto power – people have already said they do
not want that. Only Andrea and the NDP can stop Doug Ford’s cuts and
privatization, and that's why need you to help us get Joel Harden
elected in Ottawa Centre.

Here are our last few events leading up to E-Day. Click on the
embedded links to RSVP:

etc etc etc

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 18:03:58 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Methinks I should take up my concerns with its Attorney
General after it is Yasir Naqvi or his replacement I will argue in
Federal Court Correct?
To: info@nota.ca, doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Email info@nota.ca
Facebook Facebook.com/NoneOfTheAboveX
Twitter Twitter.com/NoneOfTheAboveX
YouTube YouTube.com/NoneOfTheAboveX
Phone (905) 501-0010

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 15:36:02 -0400
Subject: Fwd: Methinks I should take up my concerns with its Attorney
General after it is Yasir Naqvi or his replacement I will argue in
Federal Court Correct?
To: yasir.naqvi@ontario.ca, ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 19:18:48 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks I should take up my concerns with
its Attorney General after it is Yasir Naqvi or his replacement I will
argue in Federal Court Correct?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.

This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
message will be carefully reviewed.

To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.

Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
directly to the Department of Justice at
mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222.

Thank you

-------------------

Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.

Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.

Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.

Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.

Merci



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 15:18:27 -0400
Subject: Methinks I should take up my concerns with its Attorney
General after it is Yasir Naqvi or his replacement I will argue in
Federal Court Correct?
To: ynaqvi.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, ombuds@uottawa.ca,
recteur@uottawa.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <myson333@yahoo.com>, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>

Yasir Naqvi
109 Catherine Street
Ottawa, ON
K2P 0P4
Email: ynaqvi.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org
Phone: 613-722-6414
Fax: 613-722-6703

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ombudsman - Ombudsperson <ombuds@uottawa.ca>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 18:46:47 +0000
Subject: RE: You cannot deny that I am a taxpayer who is compelled to
support "Canada's University" Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Dear Mr. Amos,

I have no doubt that you are a citizen. The mandate of my office does
not extend to people outside the university community. If you think
your question may be under the jurisdiction of an ombudsman, you may
contact the Ontario ombudsman office to see whether they can help with
your inquiry.

Best regards,

Martine Conway, Ombudsman / Ombudsperson

Bureau de l'Ombudsman / Office of the Ombudsperson
Université d'Ottawa/ University of Ottawa
(613) 562-5342 [ext. 5342]
85 Université (Centre Universitaire) pièce 307/ 85 University
(University Centre) Room 307
Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5
www.uottawa.ca/ombudsman

Veuillez prendre note que nous ne pouvons assurer la confidentialité
des courriels.  Il est nécessaire de téléphoner si vous souhaitez
communiquer avec nous de manière confidentielle.
Please note that we cannot guarantee the confidentiality of the
content of email messages.  In order to communicate with us on a
confidential basis, you must phone us.

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: May-07-18 5:36 PM
To: Ombudsman - Ombudsperson <ombuds@uottawa.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; Cabinet du recteur -
Office of the President <recteur@uottawa.ca>; pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>;
Gerald.Butts <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; andrew.scheer
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>
Subject: You cannot deny that I am a taxpayer who is compelled to
support "Canada's University" Correct?

On 5/7/18, Ombudsman - Ombudsperson <ombuds@uottawa.ca> wrote:
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your email and attached documentation. Please note that my
> Office has a mandate to receive university-related inquiries and complaints
> from members of the university community (i.e. staff, students,
> post-doctoral fellows, affiliated researchers, professors and administrators
> at the University of Ottawa). More specifically, I review complaints to
> ensure fair treatment of university community members.
>
> You did not indicate that you were a university community member, and while
> I note the concerns you express about a connection between the current
> president and the foundation you mentioned, this is not an issue under the
> mandate of my office. I also note that the documentation you attached
> relates to issues outside the university.
>
> I hope this clarifies what I was explaining over the phone. If you are a
> member of the university community (as described above) with a specific
> inquiry or complaint about a university process, please feel free to contact
> my office and explain the situation to me.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Martine Conway, Ombudsman / Ombudsperson
>
> Bureau de l'Ombudsman / Office of the Ombudsperson
> Université d'Ottawa/ University of Ottawa
> (613) 562-5342 [ext. 5342]
> 85 Université (Centre Universitaire) pièce 307/ 85 University (University
> Centre) Room 307
> Ottawa, Ontario K1N 6N5
> www.uottawa.ca/ombudsman
>
> Veuillez prendre note que nous ne pouvons assurer la confidentialité des
> courriels.  Il est nécessaire de téléphoner si vous souhaitez communiquer
> avec nous de manière confidentielle.
> Please note that we cannot guarantee the confidentiality of the content of
> email messages.  In order to communicate with us on a confidential basis,
> you must phone us.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: May-04-18 2:17 PM
> To: Ombudsman - Ombudsperson <ombuds@uottawa.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; George.Soros
> <George.Soros@opensocietyfoundations.org>; Cabinet du recteur - Office of
> the President <recteur@uottawa.ca>
> Subject: We just talked I tried to explain to you my concerns about Jacques
> Frémont and his connection with George Soros and the Open Society
> Foundation
>
> University Centre, Room 307
> 85 University Private, Ottawa ON K1N6N5
> Tel.: 613-562-5342
> Toll-free: 1-877-868-8292 ext. 5342
> Fax: 613-562-5386
> ombudsperson@uOttawa.ca
>
> Jacques Frémont, head of Quebec human rights commission, named next
> uOttawa president
> CBC News · Posted: Dec 02, 2015 3:28 PM ET |
>
> The current head of Quebec's human rights commission has been named
> the next president of the University of Ottawa.
>
> Jacques Frémont will succeed outgoing president Allan Rock when his
> term expires at the end of June 2016, the university announced
> Wednesday afternoon.
>
> In addition to becoming the university's 30th president, Frémont will
> also serve as vice-chancellor, the university said.
>
> Frémont, an emeritus professor of law at the University of Montreal,
> became president of the Commission des droits de la personne et des
> droits de la jeunesse in 2013.
>
> He was appointed unanimously, the university said.
>
> Frémont takes over for Rock, who has been the University of Ottawa's
> president since 2008.
>
>
>
> Biography
>
> Jacques Frémont is President and Vice-Chancellor of the University of
> Ottawa. In 2013, Quebec’s legislative assembly appointed him to chair
> the Quebec Human Rights and Youth Rights Commission. Prior to this
> appointment, he worked at the Open Society Foundations, in New York,
> as Director of the International Higher Education Support Program.
>
> Mr. Frémont was formerly at the University of Montreal, where he was
> Dean of the School of Law, as well as Provost and Vice-Rector
> (Academic Affairs) until 2010. He has also been a visiting professor
> at many Quebec, Canadian, European and Asian universities, and is the
> author of several books, articles and book chapters on constitutional
> law and public law. In 2012, he was named professor emeritus of the
> University of Montreal.
>
> Throughout his career, Mr. Frémont has advised various international
> organizations on issues involving human rights, good governance and
> democracy, and has directed major international cooperation projects
> in the fields of human rights and judicial training. He has also been
> very active in higher education in Canada and abroad.
>
> Mr. Frémont is a graduate of Laval University, in Quebec City, and
> pursued graduate studies at York University in Toronto. He has been
> awarded prizes and honours, including being named to the Order of the
> French Academic Palms in 2009 and receiving an honorary doctorate from
> Paul Cézanne University in Aix-en-Provence in 2010.
>
>
> Office of the President
> Tabaret Hall (map)
> 550 Cumberland, Room 212
> Ottawa ON K1N 6N5
> Canada
>
> Tel.:  613-562-5809
> Fax:  613-562-5103
> president@uOttawa.ca
>
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
etc etc etc





Replying to and 3 others
There isn't a soul alive that would inspire me to wade through your poorly formatted blog to figure out what delusions you are suffering from. Dude, you are not as important as you think you are.I mean this in the nicest possible way. Have you met Amy MacPherson by chance?

  1. Replying to
    If you are sincere then perhaps you should finally read this blog and your emails and say my name ASAP EH? Everybody in the know knows I am not shy and that my number is 902 800 0369 Correct?


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/01/yo-bill-morneau-are-opposition-leaders.html

  1. Replying to and3 others
    I waited for hours making lots of comments and creating a blog before I called the NDP 647-580-8804 and the PCs 647-696-5808 to see if they had read my Tweet 
    As soon as they said "How we help you?" I was done talking. 
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/06/out-of-gate-today-cbc-and-buddies-in.html


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-toronto-ontario-1.4688367


Will Toronto help give Doug Ford a majority government?

NDP, PCs are looking to make gains in Toronto off the backs of the faltering Liberals



Éric Grenier· CBC News· Posted: Jun 02, 2018 4:00 AM ET


1885 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.

 

Clearly my first comment within this "news' item"was responded to three times by my political foes before CBC disabled it N'esy Pas? 



Michael G. L. Geraldson
Bob King
If you really want to know more about Doug Ford, I suggest you Google the following; Globe investigation: The Ford family’s history with drug dealing.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Bob King Methinks serious folks should Google three names N'esy Pas? 

David Amos Christine Elliott Patrick Brown


Andy Davis
Andy Davis
@David Amos n’est pas is how it’s written
If you’re going to use another language. At least do it correctly


David Amos
David Amos
@Andy Davis Methinks you should never mind my spelling and confer with your friends Christine Elliott and Patrick Brown ASAP N'esy Pas?


Michael G. L. Geraldson
Michael G. L. Geraldson
@Andy Davis
Actually, it's n'est-ce pas.


David Amos
David Amos
@Michael G. L. Geraldson Methinks you must be talking to your pal about the spelling within the ghost of a comment that once was instead checking out the tip about your beloved PCs N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Michael G. L. Geraldson Methinks you should ask your Conservative buddies if their French is any better than mine N'esy Pas:?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ontario-provincial-election-feds-1.4655519

"Ford's campaign employs many people from former prime minister Stephen Harper's old order of battle. His campaign manager, Kory Teneycke, was Harper's director of communications. Jenni Byrne ran Harper's campaigns in 2011 and 2015; she's now mapping out ridings for Ford as his director of field operations."

Neil Gregory
Neil Gregory
@David Amos

People who choose to mangle one of Canada's official languages can NOT be taken seriously.


David Amos
David Amos 
@Neil Gregory Methinks its rather comical that so many of my English speaking political foes love to correct my French rather that check my work. However I doubt that Doug Ford's and Kory Teneycke's command of the French lingo is any better than mine or the Yankee they call "The Donald" N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ontario-provincial-election-feds-1.4655519

"Wynne compared Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Doug Ford to a certain rage-tweeting, media-bashing leader south of the border.

"Doug Ford sounds like Donald Trump and that's because he is like Donald Trump,""He will say anything about anyone at any time. Because just like Trump, it is all about him."

"Trudeau also used the memory of another divisive figure in conservative politics as a stick to bash his rival.

"It may be Andrew Scheer's smile," Trudeau told the crowd. "But it's still Stephen Harper's party,"

To be sure, an Ontario government led by Ford would be a nagging headache for the Trudeau Liberals. For them, losing a friendly government in Ontario would mean losing useful political support for key federal policies, such as carbon pricing"

"Meanwhile, Ford and his federal counterpart Scheer sometimes sound like they're reading from the same script — offering simply-worded slogans and talking points about smaller government, job creation, economic growth and getting rid of Trudeau's carbon pricing plan.

I think the members of Andrew Scheer's campaign are going to watch (Ontario) closely," said Chad Rogers, a partner at Crestview Strategies and a former Conservative staffer. "And every day that Doug Ford has a good day, that his messages work, they're going to consider that a successful trial run for something they might want to do in 2019."

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Bob King Methinks you may enjoy my input within the most like comment threads in the latest "news' item before they go "Poof" as well N'esy Pas?


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/wynne-liberals-ontario-election-minority-government-1.4689222


Lets see how long it takes VIAFOURA to disable more of my replies(Lots and the top two "most liked" threads have gone "POOF" thus far in the second article)




David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@David Amos Methinks it must be obvious to the political party people who comment all the time in here that my first comment within this "news' item"was responded to three times by my political foes before CBC disabled it and many more have been blocked since N'esy Pas?


Michael G. L. Geraldson 
Harvey keck
PCs 38.6%, NDP 34.9%, Liberals 19.3%

The socialist surge is reversing. Thank God.


mo bennett
mo bennett
@Harvey keck yer gonna need help from all the fictional deities ever imagined if doug and the slugs wynne on june 7th!


David Allan
David Allan
@mo bennett
"yer gonna need help from all the fictional deities ever imagined if doug and the slugs wynne on june 7th!"

Who are you voting for?

It seems that any time any candidate's name comes up you have nothing positive to say about them.

It's quite clear you don't stand for anything except whinging and whining.

David Amos
David Amos
@Harvey keck Methinks it ain't over until the fat lady sings at all the polling stations on June 7th N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@mo bennett "yer gonna need help from all the fictional deities ever imagined if doug and the slugs wynne on june 7th!"

YO MO Methinks your fictional deities just crawled off and hid under a rock N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/wynne-liberals-ontario-election-minority-government-1.4689222

Wynne acknowledges election is lost, urges voters to ensure NDP or PC minority

David Amos
David Amos
@David Allan "Who are you voting for? It seems that any time any candidate's name comes up you have nothing positive to say about them.

FYI people don't have to pick sides at the circus in order to sit and laugh at the nonsense of all the clowns

Methinks that you political party minions don't understand Independent opinions anyway N'esy Pas?


John Douglas
John Douglas
@Harvey keck

Ford said he will butt in and fire the CEO of a private company and tell the Board what they will be paid

cons normally call that "socialism"


John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@John Douglas

The Conservatives don't understand what socialism is...

They think it's just a bad word or an insult...


David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree :They think it's just a bad word or an insult"

Methinks that is because that is what it is to most folks blessed with commons sene N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@John Douglas YUP


David Amos
David Amos
@Kathy Altenhofen Methinks you political party people must finally understand why I always run as an Independent and CBC always fails to mention it until the elections are over N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276

 
David Amos
David Amos
@Chuck Hamilton Methinks serious political party people should Google three names and mine ASAP N'esy Pas?

David Amos Bill Morneau Christine Elliott Patrick Brown

Michael G. L. Geraldson 
Harvey keck
The liberals are finished thankfully. If you want more destruction vote NDP.


David Amos
David Amos
@Harvey keck "If you want more destruction vote NDP."

Methinks that why Ford may win by default N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks a lot of folks will dismiss you the instant you try to justify Carbon Tax N'esy Pas?

Michael G. L. Geraldson 
Jeremy Kemp
Torontonians have had enough of the Fords to last ten lifetimes. Doug's schtick doesn't wash after several years of exaggerations by the Ford brothers.


David Amos
David Amos
@Robert West "the only people deeply offended were the Toronto unions."

Good Point Sir


Michael G. L. Geraldson 
Lee Hall
Doug Ford and the Conservatives are the official party of well connected, very wealthy people, and corporations. They are not for the middle class and working people. Show me a conservative government that is.

Ford will ensure his friends, who really don't need financial help, will get plenty wealthier. At the expense of healthcare, schools, and vital services.

We have seen it all before.


Robert Paul
Robert Paul
@Lee Hall

Baloney. I am an intelligent, well educated, but middle-class person, and I know what I'm voting for. I am voting Conservative.

It's the Liberal party that is connected with big business and makes laws to hurt small business. This is as true today as it has been historically.

David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Paul Methinks we should not forget the NDP and all their greedy union cohorts who keep their boat afloat N'esy Pas?


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Lee Hall

Yet he professes to be for the little guy, and a lot of little guys believe him. Angry ones.

Women? Not so much.

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Methinks he has a lot of ladies running under his banner N'esy Pas?

Darren MacDonald
Darren MacDonald
@David Amos True dat.

Garry Walton 
Garry Walton
Even liberal Torontonians are finally realizing they pay taxes too.

They also realize the NDP platform would be the end of any semblance of prosperity and a

gateway into the abyss of financial hell.


Garry Walton
Garry Walton
@David Allan

Can't say my conclusions, but my observations.

Buty you're partly right, apparently, according to the polls, 23% of

Torontians still don't own a calculator.

David Amos
David Amos
@Garry Walton "23% of Torontians still don't own a calculator"

Methinks many that do own a calculator don't bother to use them because its too depressing N'esy Pas?.


John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@David Amos

N'esy Pas is gibberish...

n'est-ce pas is what you're looking for...

David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree NOPE

John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@David Amos

Alright - speak gibberish...

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks I would be no match for a mindless socialist N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks it not fair of CBC to block my reply to a socialist's insult N'esy Pas?

Michael G. L. Geraldson 
Louisa Walker
That Doug would win anywhere is a disgrace.


Robert Paul
Robert Paul
@Louisa Walker

Don't insult me. I am voting for Doug and I know what I'm doing.

David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Paul Methinks the lady doth protest too much N'esy Pas?


John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@David Amos

It's: "n'est-ce pas"

Michael G. L. Geraldson 
Jim Graham
Doug Ford is a bad choice for Ontario and a bad choice for Toronto. We suffered under the Ford brothers once ... and that's more than enough.

Vote strategically; find the candidate most likely to defeat the Con pick in your riding. Even if Ford gets a minority, he wont last longer than his first budget which, unlike his broken promise for a funded and costed platform, he won't be able to hide his fiscal incompetence.

A vote for Ford is a vote for Trump-style governance in Canada. Even Cons can't wish that fate for our province.


Robert Paul
Robert Paul
@Jim Graham

All baloney.

David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Paul YUP


Buford Wilson 
Buford Wilson
I'm seeing a glorious victory for Doug.

The pride is back.


Kevin McBurney
Kevin McBurney
@Buford Wilson
You mean Doug Ford IS going to march in this years Pride Parade ?
Who'd have thunk.


David Amos
David Amos
@Kevin McBurney Methinks a lot folks would pay to watch that circus N'esy Pas?


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Buford Wilson

Doug Ford has the apparent intellect of a grade 10 student. Just sayin'.

I've been watching and listening to him for months, so i know what i'm sayin'.
 

David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Methinks you can never explain the educations of the lawyers etc who are running under his leadership N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Methinks you would have had enough education and or political savvy to at least checkout my tip to Google these three names Bill Morneau, Christine Elliott, Patrick Brown and mine N'esy Pas?


Michael G. L. Geraldson 
Barry Spinoza
Torontonian here voting Ford!


Gerry Ferguson
Gerry Ferguson
@Barry Spinoza
I agree. The CBC is trying desperately to keep him out but he'll roll to a majority.

Robert Paul
Robert Paul
@Gerry Ferguson

I sure hope so, but I'm scared, honestly.

Robert Paul
Robert Paul
@Robert Paul

Scared that he might not win.


David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Paul Methinks that many people believe that they got the government they deserve until the next election N'esy Pas?

Nick Mcbain 
Nick Mcbain
NDP won in BC.

NDP won in Albera...

Why not NDP win in Ontario?


Robert Paul
Robert Paul
@Nick Mcbain

They might, which is what many of us are terrified of.

David Amos
David Amos
@Nick Mcbain Methinks it may because the NDP lost the last Federal Election to the third party lead by a drama teacher N'esy Pas?


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
@Ray Phillips

Notley just nailed a pipeline no other Alberta gov't could. She's NDP, no?


David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp "Notley just nailed a pipeline no other Alberta gov't could. She's NDP, no?"

Nope everybody knows Jason Kenney is the next Premier of Alberta. He will make Carbon Tax a footnote history if Ford and Premier Mo do not make it so before him.. Methinks Kinder Morgan just suckered Trudeau "The Younger" into buying an old pipeline because the end of the Yankee petrodollar is near and it was not worth being stuck between two mindless NDP mandates one day longer N'esy Pas?

Wynne acknowledges election is lost, urges voters to ensure NDP or PC minority

Some polls suggest the Liberals could lose official party status with fewer than 8 seats

CBC News· Posted: Jun 02, 2018 10:58 AM ET 


4430 Comments
Commenting is now closed for this story.


Jan Lenova 
Jan Lenova
"Wynne asked voters to continue to cast a ballot for the Liberals as a way to prevent a PC or NDP majority"
Why ?! With that statement Wynne just told Liberal voters to throw their votes away on a lifeless carcass of a horse called the Liberals.
Stopping Harris 2.0 (Ford) will require every Lib swing vote that's left to go towards the NDP.

She should've just told her, how ever many remaining, Lib'ers that are left to vote NDP.
Buy NOOO, she has to wreck that too, on her way OUT !?


David Amos 
Page is closed to commenting.
David Amos
@Jan Lenova Methinks you sound just like a certain very nervous NDP person N'esy Pas?


David Amos
Content disabled..
David Amos
@David Amos Methinks it must be obvious to the political party people who comment all the time in here that the top two "most liked" comment threads about this news' item have gone "POOF" N'esy Pas?


David James 
"POOF"
David James
Thank God she's gone. Now let's all get behind Doug and get Ontario working again.


David Amos
David Amos
@David James Methinks the "I ain't Sorry Premier" threw in the towel too soon because everybody knows it ain't over until the Fat Lady Sings. she knows that just one Maritimer could do a lot in the last few days to take the wind out of Doug Ford's sails. All Wynne has to do is finally say my name N'esy Pas?


Richard Dekkar 
"POOF"
Richard Dekkar
So it was a secret NDP coalition all along!

There’s only one choice to save Ontario! Please Ontario vote against the Wynne-NDP cabal!


David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Dekkar Methinks that loyal liberals should Google the following names and checkout the first link Google offers

David Amos Bill Morneau Patrick Brown Andrea Horwath Premier Wynne

Then ask their outgoing leader about an email from me that her office computer acknowledged on Sunday March 11th, 2018


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Richard Dekkar Methinks that it is rather strange that you do not respond to anyone within a thread you inspired Perhaps your comments have been disabled N'esy Pas?


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Jack Cochrane "Liberals have been doling out corporate welfare for decades to the public sector unions benefitting only those fortunate enough to work for a public sector union."

Methinks that is one of the main reasons why CBC blocks so many of my comments N'esy Pas?


Jolly Rodrigo
Jim Johnson
Bye Bye Liberals, you may not even get official party status and that would be great news.


David Amos
David Amos
@Jim Johnson Indeed it would be interesting news However methinks that the folks in Ontario do deserve a minority government just as the lady suggests N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Gordon MacFarlane "The "farce" is strong and runs deep in some voters"

Methinks the same can be said of those who support the blue coats too N'esy Pas?


Tina Palestina
Tina Palestina
@David Amos

You remind me of my ex who says things just to get a rise out of people.

That's partly why he's my ex and although I don't do this ever, but muting the N'esy Pas once and for all is just another way to avoid being annoyed needlessly.

Ciao.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Tina Palestina Methinks like your ex I won't miss you N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Tina Palestina Methinks that even you must have found it rather interesting that my reply to you stood for many hours before it was disabled N'esy Pas?

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Kate Ferguson "Bye bye Liberals. Hello - ??????"

Methinks the same could be said of this comment thread Whereas the top two "most liked" comment threads have gone "POOF" we should wonder how long this one lasts N'esy Pas?


Nick O'Reilly
Nick O'Reilly
@David Amos
Methinks you are a twit. Nesypas?

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Nick O'Reilly Methinks that may be because you checked my comments in Twitter about you and your cohorts N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Nick O'Reilly Methinks thats because I employ Twitter N'esy Pas?

Benjamin Moses
Benjamin Moses
@Jim Johnson Go Ford, Go! Destroy the liberal and NDP Communist vermin!

Nick O'Reilly
Nick O'Reilly
@David Amos
Does that make you want to shame me?

David Amos
David Amos
@Nick O'Reilly Methinks if you have a conscience then that is a trait you bring upon yourself if you don't have one then why should I bother with minor political minion? There are many well known sociopaths playing politics I must deal with ASAP N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Nick O'Reilly Methinks that you don't even understand the link between Bill Morneau, Christine Elliott, Patrick Brown and I N'esy Pas?

Nick O'Reilly
Nick O'Reilly
@David Amos
I think it would be best if I figure it out for myself perhaps, but for the sake of expediency, you should explain it.

Jim Johnson 
Jim Johnson
I am hoping to hear the same thing from Trudeau in 2019 that all is lost .


David Amos
David Amos
@Jim Johnson "I am hoping to hear the same thing from Trudeau in 2019 that all is lost '

Me Too


Kent Brockman
Kent Brockman
@Jim Johnson Justin will win again in the next election based on the millennial voters women aboriginal lgbtq2 and every tragically hip fan in Canada and there’s nothing you can do about it Dude is and international political rockstar get used to it


David Amos
David Amos
@Kent Brockman Methinks that you may be wise to prepare yourself for i a shocking surprise next year N'esy Pas?


Nick O'Reilly
Nick O'Reilly
@Jim Johnson
Trudeau's tearful farewell address will be epic.


David Kane
David Kane
@Jim Johnson - He and Freeland can share a box of tissues

David Amos
David Amos
@Nick O'Reilly Methinks you should say Hey to Harper 2.0 for me N'esy Pas?

 Jolly Rodrigo
Jolly Rodrigo
330 billion debt
formerly best utility in the world reduced to subsidizing rates
12 billion deficit
local hospitals gone

thank you liberals, enjoy your golden years.

Jimmy Kooymans
Jimmy Kooymans
@Jolly Rodrigo
J J J J Jolly......You ain't seen nothin' yet.......J J J J Jolly....You just ain't seen nothin yet.

David Amos
David Amos
@Jimmy Kooymans Methinks there is a lot of truth to be found in jest N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks the socialist supporters have been busy today in CBC N'esy Pas?


Nick O'Reilly
Nick O'Reilly
@David Amos
Nesy Pas, how do you rank 77,000?


David Amos
David Amos
@Nick O'Reilly "I think it would be best if I figure it out for myself perhaps, but for the sake of expediency, you should explain it."

Methinks there is not enough time left to bother with you N'esy Pas?

Jimmy Kooymans 
Paul Douglas
Why would anyone listen to Wynne?
If this woman had an ounce of integrity she would have resigned long ago.


Gordon MacFarlane
Gordon MacFarlane
@Wil Brown

"conservative parents are typically intolerant of anyone different"

The depth and breadth of the bigotry in that statement is alarming.

What a sad and nasty thing to think


David Amos
David Amos
@Gordon MacFarlane Methinks if you are truly alarmed then you should ponder as to why you are so intolerant of my opinions N'esy Pas?


Gordon MacFarlane
Gordon MacFarlane
@David Amos

Not intolerant of your opinions, just completely disinterested in them, Netty Pot?

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Gordon MacFarlane Methinks C'est la meme chose N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Gordon MacFarlane Methinks its so sad too bad that you could not read my reply yu may have enjoyed it N'esy Pas?

Paul Bigras 
Paul Bigras
I always believed that the liberals and the NDP were one in the same.


David Amos
David Amos
@Paul Bigras Methinks that the liberals and the conservatives are one and the same. The BLOC, the NDP and the Greens are quite simply irrelevant N'esy Pas?


David Kane
David Kane
@Paul Bigras - Its a challenge to figure which one would spend you into bankruptcy quicker
  
Paul Bigras
Jane Beagle
Her vision has made Ontario one of thee most indebted subsovereign nations on the planet, and she has the audacity to plead with voters not to give power to another. What a sad, shameful lady.


Paul Pedersen
Paul Pedersen
@Jane Beagle True but only if that planet is limited to the confines of your livingroom.

David Amos
David Amos
@Paul Pedersen Methinks the lady is correct about Ontario, being the world's most indebted sub-sovereign borrower. That includes your neighbourhood too N'esy Pas?

  
Paul Pedersen
Elaine Hancock
Wynne wants the balance of power in an NDP minority situation. That’s if she wins her seat. So it would be business as usual, only worse. Two alt-left parties dragging the province into more debt, more government, more socialism.


Robert Paul
Robert Paul
@Elaine Hancock

Which means much less economic and legal freedom.

We're grown-ups, and we need to vote for freedom, and against the government telling us what to do with our money and our choices. The government is just other grown-ups, so how dare they take away our money to spend it on their pet projects and regulate every last detail of our lives???

Down with the Left!

Bobby Black
Bobby Black
@Robert Paul
haha do you think the "right" doesn't spend money on their pet projects? And truly, the right-wing works hard to regulate every last detail of our lives, evidently you haven't noticed. You may vote for corporate welfare, but surely all Ontarians aren't so blind.


David Amos
David Amos
@Bobby Black Methinks they are all as crazy as loons N'esy Pas?


Paul Pedersen
Paul Douglas
The Liberal Party has lost its way both in Ontario and Federally. They both need to re invent the party from the grassroots up so that they provide another reasonable centrist option for voters.


Jane Beagle
Jane Beagle
@Audrey Rumle

oh no you've got it. ButHarperitis. Take two doses of reality and get some rest.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Jane Beagle "oh no you've got it. ButHarperitis"

Methinks you may suffer from "KissHarperButtitis" N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Jane Beagle Methinks I have a name for your affliction that CBC does not appear to appreciate N'esy Pas?


Paul Pedersen
Charlize Croft
Wynne has her tentacles entrenched into the NDP. If you vote for the NDP you may as well be casting your ballot for Wynne......


Paul Pedersen
Paul Pedersen
@Charlize Croft what utter rubbish. Really.

David Amos
David Amos
@Paul Pedersen Methinks you just gotta love the circus N'esy Pas?


Alex Keith 
Alex Keith
Worst premiere in the history of Canada. Wynne is a disgrace.


David Amos
David Amos
@Alex Keith Methinks you and I are related unless you picked your name from a beer bottle N'esy Pas?


Beth Conway 
Beth Conway
Step down, Kathleen..You're still trying to meddle in an election that
you've already lost..The Left wants to rule forever...Leave it to the voters
and retire..at last!


David Amos
David Amos
@Beth Conway Methinks she will not listen to you or anyone else for that matter N'esy Pas?


Jim Dandee 
Jim Dandee
Little chance her jersey number will be retired.


David Amos
David Amos
@Jim Dandee LOL


David Amos 
David Amos
Methinks serious political party people should Google three names Bill Morneau, Christine Elliott, Patrick Brown and mine ASAP N'esy Pas?


Gary Christopher
Gary Christopher
@David Amos Why?

David Amos
David Amos
@Gary Christopher Methinks I said serious political party people N'esy Pas?

Gary Christopher
Gary Christopher
@David Amos We already know there are no serious political parties in Canada. I don't need to google it.

David Amos
David Amos
@Gary Christopher Methinks Nick O'Reilly can explain thing for you N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Gary Christopher FYI

Nick O'Reilly just said "I think it would be best if I figure it out for myself perhaps, but for the sake of expediency, you should explain it."

My response was that he should say Hey to Harper 2.0 for me N'esy Pas?

Gary Christopher
Gary Christopher
@David Amos Sure!! What ever you say!!! Hmmmmm! N'esy Pas!

David Amos
David Amos
@Gary Christopher Methinks I should ask the obvious question did I talk to you or Nick O'Reilly or one of you associates yesterday? I did talk to a lot of political people speaking on behalf of several political parties They is no way I could remember them all N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Gary Christopher So I did?


Jim Dandee 
Gary Christopher
Voters!! Please, please, please,, be careful of what you wish for!! Once elected, a majority government will impose their will on all of us!! No matter who we like or don't like, a majority government will not listen to the people, because they don't have to!! Best case scenario, minority government, just to keep our so called politician honest.


David Amos
David Amos
@Gary Christopher Methinks you talk just like you liberal leader More importantly isn't that exactly what the Liberal mandates have been doing for years N'esy Pas?


Jim Dandee
 Ted Barry
"many voters are worried about handing a blank cheque to either Doug Ford or the NDP" - Kathleen ....I don't know why you're worried ...... the voters gave it to you (twice) and you still succeeded to screw things up..... .


David Amos
David Amos
@Ted Barry YUP


David Kane 
David Kane
Trudeau should take notes on Wynnes speeches for when he abdicates the throne, as failed King in 2019. Give him time to had in the annoying ummm errrr umms


David Amos
David Amos
@David Kane Methinks Methinks Trudeau The Younger will do just fine no matter the outcome. If he suffers the predicable big loss all the Drama teacher has to do is shed a crocodile tear or two to keep the ladies eating out of his hand then go back on the talk circuit like Harper is now to make a really big score N'esy Pas?


Gary Christopher
Benjamin Moses
Go Ford, Go! Destroy the liberal and NDP Communist vermin!


Gary Christopher
Gary Christopher
@Benjamin Moses Great, Ontario, the butt of all jokes.

John Britt
John Britt
@Benjamin Moses With all due respect, this kind of jingoist bombast is neither accurately representative nor helpful to a meaningful political discussion or debate, unless of course your intent is to demonstrate your preferred candidate is little more than a blowhard appealing to the lowest common denominator. While you're at it, you might want to point out the communist conspiracy to pollute our precious bodily fluids through fluoridation.

David Amos
David Amos
@Benjamin Moses Methinks you seem a little bitter about something and you have upset Mr Britt and Mr Christopher greatly N'esy Pas?



http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/biting-the-political-bullet-wynne-clears-path-for-liberals-to-campaign-out-of-her-shadow-1.4689343


Biting the political bullet, Wynne clears path for Liberals to campaign out of her shadow

Admission of defeat widely seen as a Hail Mary for Liberals to win enough seats to keep party status

CBC News· Posted: Jun 02, 2018 5:10 PM ET


608 Comments 
Commenting is now closed for this story

  
Richard Ade
Gary Barratt
J.T is following in her footsteps , he has accomplished very little other than growing the deficit.


David Amos
David Amos
@Gary Barratt Methinks that all the political party people I called last evening after reading this article should be clever enough to Google three names Bill Morneau, Christine Elliott, Patrick Brown and mine N'esy Pas?


Buford Wilson 
Buford Wilson
We may be witnessing the end of the Liberal Party of Ontario.


Kate Ferguson
Kate Ferguson
@Buford Wilson

No, you wish you were witnessing the end of the LPO - isn't that more truthful?

mo bennett
mo bennett
@Buford Wilson too bad we weren't witnessing the end of all political parties! and their occupants!

Richard Nichols
Richard Nichols
@mo bennett

mo for PM...mo knows!

mo bennett
mo bennett
@Richard Nichols no thanks, doesn't pay any where near enough.


Juan Torranso 
Juan Torranso
She's got four years more than she deserved.


mo bennett
mo bennett
@Juan Torranso 15, yer math is really bad.


Karl H Blatt 
Karl H Blatt
I think with the Conservatives Ontario will soon rise out of the ashes. I just hope that Canada will follow as soon as the Conservatives return to flourish again. Don't blame me I voted Conservative.


Jed Took
Jed Took
@Karl H Blatt

NDP...all the way

mo bennett
mo bennett
@Karl H Blatt how soon dumb voters forget.


David Amos
David Amos
Methinks that once the fat Lady Sinks on June 7th everybody can cry me a river as I laugh and watch the circus go on and on until the next federal polling day in 2019 N'esy Pas?


Emmi Ward
Emmi Ward
@David Amos just checking if N'esy could also be another way of saying "Nessie" as in the monster of folk lore...beneath the waters of the Loch... is that one way of putting it?

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Emmi Ward Methinks you are well aware of the fact that I explained it several times Now you political party people are merely embarrassing yourselves Methinks in the past month in particular you people would have been far wiser to check my tips instead of attacking my spelling N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@Emmi Ward Methinks serious political party people would have understood my tip to Google three names Bill Morneau, Christine Elliott Patrick Brown and mine instead of teasing me about spelling N'esy Pas?


mo bennett
mo bennett
@David Amos methinks now you've finally agreed with me that all politicians are absolutely useless, messy paws!

mo bennett
mo bennett
@Emmi Ward nah! he just keeps misspelling messy.

mo bennett
mo bennett
@David Amos now yer callin''em marionettes, which is exactly what they all are. good for you!





http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/01/yo-bill-morneau-are-opposition-leaders.html

Friday, 19 January 2018


Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial election? 

 

---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 05:43:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Bill Morneau The news tonight of Doug Ford's victory 
is finally true Methinks that you Liberals will lose the next Federal Election if he defeats 
Wynne too Seems Sunny Days are over N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier


Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,

Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario

Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 05:43:50 +0000
Subject: RE: Yo Bill Morneau The news tonight of Doug Ford's victory
is finally true Methinks that you Liberals will lose the next Federal
Election if he defeats Wynne too Seems Sunny Days are over N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 05:43:45 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Bill Morneau The news tonight of Doug Ford's 
victory is finally true Methinks that you Liberals will lose the next Federal Election 
if he defeats Wynne too Seems Sunny Days areover N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition


---------- Original message ----------
From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2018 21:43:43 -0800
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Yo Bill Morneau The news
tonight of Doug Ford's victory is finally true Methinks that you
Liberals will lose the next Federal Election if he defeats Wynne too
Seems Sunny Days are over N'esy Pas?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Hello,

Thank you for getting in touch with the Caroline Mulroney for Leader campaign.

We wanted to let you know that we have received your message and that
we will be in touch shortly to follow up with you.

If you have a question about the voting process once you've received
your package, please contact our office's help desk at 416-922-0573.

The deadline to vote is Friday, March 9 at 12:00 pm (noon). You will
receive an email with your ballot a shortly after verifying online
with your ID. If you have not yet received your ballot after verifying
and are concerned about voting on time, feel free to contact us and
we'll be happy to help.

If you need help verifying or voting, you can attend one of our
events, or sign up for our mobile assistance. All information
regarding voter accessibility services can be found at
www.carolinemulroney.ca.

Sincerely,

The Caroline Mulroney for Leader Campaign

Let's get it done!

--

Caroline Mulroney Campaign
416-922-0573
www.CarolineMulroney.ca
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carolinemulroneyPC/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/C_Mulroney



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 01:43:40 -0400
Subject: Yo Bill Morneau The news tonight of Doug Ford's victory is finally true 
Methinks that you Liberals will lose the next Federal Election if he defeats Wynne too 
Seems Sunny Days are over N'esy Pas?
To: "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, tanya@pafe.ca,
patrick.brown@pc.ola.org, doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, 
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, asktvo@tvo.org, info@rodformpp.ca,
"carolyn.bennett"<carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, "Navdeep.Bains"<Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
Mike.Crawley@cbc.ca, "ht.lacroix"<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, 
 jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>,   jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, 
 gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "Sophia.Harris"<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,   nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, 
 "jeremy.keefe"<jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ontario-progressive-conservatives-pcs-new-leader-election-1.4571014

Doug Ford named new Ontario PC leader after chaotic convention day
Announcement of Ford’s win was delayed by more than 7 hours over ballot dispute
Lucas Powers · CBC News · Posted: Mar 10, 2018 12:00 PM ET

Mike Crawley
‏Verified account @CBCQueensPark
26 minutes ago

BREAKING: Christine Elliott is NOT conceding the Ontario PC leadership
to Doug Ford. In this statement she claims “serious irregularities” in
the race. #onpoli #pcpoldr.

Remember the emails I sent you about Ontario's Provincial Election
since January?

If not you can find some of them within the link found below and many
people know it. Trust that there will be more to follow.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/yo-bill-morneau-are-opposition-leaders.html

Friday, 19 January 2018

Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea
Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial
election?


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: tanya@pafe.ca
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2018 02:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Yo Tanya ask your pal Bob Bryenton (519 332 2883) or
Patty Baby Brown or his lawyers or CTV why I am so pissed off
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Dear DAvid

Email received.

Best, Sarina for Tanya

On 2018-02-24T11:40:31-05:00, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You received a new 0:40 minutes voicemail message, on
> Friday, February 23, 2018 at 08:35:14 AM in mailbox
>  9028000369 from "Bob Bryenton"<5193322883>.
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/brown-ontario-pc-libel-suit-1.4550333
>
>
> Former Ontario PC leader Patrick Brown sends notice of libel to CTV News
> Brown accuses CTV of 'false, malicious, irresponsible and defamatory' reporting
> CBC News Posted: Feb 24, 2018 7:38 AM ET
>
> "Howard Winkler, among the team representing Brown, confirmed that CTV
> had received notice."
>
> https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4386982/Patrick-Brown-notice-of-libel.pdf
>
> http://www.lawtimesnews.com/article/former-client-suing-aird-and-berlis-winkler-8767/
>
> Former client suing Aird & Berlis, Winkler
> March 12, 2007|Written By Helen Burnett
>
> A copyright case involving two internet companies has culminated in
> one of the parties suing its former lawyer and law firm, alleging he
> “breached his duty of candor to the court” and “undermined the dignity
> of the legal process.”
>
> Howard Winkler, a partner with Aird & Berlis LLP and a specialist in
> civil litigation, was originally hired as lead counsel by plaintiff
> Netbored Inc. in 2003, after the company claimed that one of its
> former employees, who later joined defendant Avery Holdings Inc.,
> breached its copyright. Winkler denies the claims made against him.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:31:55 -0400
> Subject: Re: Tanya vs. Patrick Brown Why can't politicians be honest
> for a change? Why lie to me and say you did not get my email yet send
> me your hustle?
> To: "Dr. Teresa Pierre"<tanya@pafe.ca>, "patrick.brown"
> <patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>, christine <christine@christine2018.ca>,
> doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, caroline <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:53:12 -0800
> Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau
> and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I
> would like to see become the next PC leader and everybody know I am
> NOT religious
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for getting in touch with the Caroline Mulroney for Leader
> campaign. We’ve heard from hundreds of people like you who are excited
> about the change that Caroline will bring to Ontario as the Leader of
> the PC Party and the next Premier.
>
> We wanted to let you know that we have received your message and that
> we will be in touch shortly to follow up with you.
>
> In the meantime, if you haven’t had the opportunity to get a
> membership, please visit carolinemulroney.ca to sign up and vote for
> Caroline on March 2nd.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> The Caroline Mulroney for Leader Campaign
>
> --
>
> Caroline Mulroney Campaign
> 416-922-0573
> www.CarolineMulroney.ca
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Dr. Teresa Pierre"<tanya@pafe.ca>
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Tanya vs. Patrick Brown
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> (Tanya Granic Allen is on leave of absence while she seeks the
> leadership of the PC Party of Ontario. Dr. Teresa Pierre, PAFE’s
> founder, will step in as interim President.)
>
> David,
>
> I have several important updates since I wrote to you last Friday.
>
>   - The media reviews of Tanya Granic Allen's TVOntario debate
> performance have been breathtaking. Even the liberal press has been
> fawning. Thomas Walkom of The Toronto Star wrote of her "bravura"
> performance and said that, compared to Tanya, Caroline Mulroney and
> Christine Elliott seemed "anemic"; Mike Crawley of CBC News wrote,
> “Debate proves Tanya Granic Allen will be a factor in Ontario PC
> leadership race”; In The Globe and Mail, Adam Radwanski wrote that
> Tanya “certainly made the most of her opportunity to set the
> leadership campaign’s tone.”
>
>   - Tanya was formally accepted into the race. This is great news! It
> means that she is definitely going to be on the ballot. Further, I can
> assure you that Tanya is not a quitter. She is in this to the end. If
> you signed up to vote for her, you will finally be allowed to vote for
> a pro parental rights candidate.
>
>   - Patrick Brown has been allowed into the race. Actually, we at PAFE
> don't mind this, so long as he loses! As Tanya put it so well, we
> should welcome Brown's candidacy because "finally, he will be held to
> account for his political crimes.”
>
> So now what? What can we do to help Tanya?
>
> ***  MOST IMPORTANT ***: If you (or a friend, or a neighbour) paid the
> $10 and joined the PC Party in order to vote for Tanya, then it is
> really quite important that you go to
> ‎https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/join3  and let Tanya know
> that you support her! That way, Tanya’s campaign can contact you
> directly with important information regarding how the ONLINE voting
> system works. It is mildly complicated, so please get in touch with
> them via the above link TODAY and you will be sent more information.
> Please!
>
> For everyone (PC members and everyone else too),please:
>
> 1. Go to Tanya’s new Facebook page and LIKE it!
> https://www.facebook.com/TanyaGranicAllenPC/2
> <https://www.facebook.com/TanyaGranicAllenPC>5193322883>

>
> 2. Tanya’s campaign needs financial support, and you can get a
> generous political tax credit for your donation. Click here for more
> information <https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/donate>.
>
> We rarely get an opportunity to support a candidate who shares our
> values and beliefs. Tanya is the only candidate swho is ready to
> repeal the Wynne Sex-Ed Agenda. Let's get behind her so we can stop
> the sexualization of Ontario's children.
>
> Teresa Pierre, PhD
>
> P.S. Again, please, if you are a PC member and if you support Tanya
> Granic Allen, please let her know this!
> https://tanyagranicallen.nationbuilder.com/join3
>
>
>
> -=-=-
> Parents As First Educators Inc. - Canada
> This email was sent to motomaniac333@gmail.com.  To stop receiving
> emails: http://www.pafe.ca/unsubscribe
> -=-=-
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/trust-that-tvo-billy-morneau-and.html
>
> Friday, 16 February 2018
>
> Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya
> Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next PC leader
> and everybody knows I am NOT religious
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: ask tvo <asktvo@tvo.org>
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:52:43 +0000
> Subject: RE: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers
> know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the
> next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Dear David,
>
> Thank you for contacting TVO.
>
> We appreciate that you’ve taken the time to share this information
> with us, I’ve shared it with the appropriate people.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nadine
> Customer Relations
>
> Help make the world a better place through the power of learning. Donate today.
>
>
> Good customer service is important to us at TVO. Please take a moment
> to let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the level of
> service provided by our Customer Relations Representative, by
> completing this survey.
>
>
> ---------- Original  message ----------
> From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:53:12 -0800
> Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau
> and the Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I
> would like to see become the next PC leader and everybody know I am
> NOT religious
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for getting in touch with the Caroline Mulroney for Leader
> campaign. We’ve heard from hundreds of people like you who are excited
> about the change that Caroline will bring to Ontario as the Leader of
> the PC Party and the next Premier.
>
> We wanted to let you know that we have received your message and that
> we will be in touch shortly to follow up with you.
>
> In the meantime, if you haven’t had the opportunity to get a
> membership, please visit carolinemulroney.ca to sign up and vote for
> Caroline on March 2nd.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> The Caroline Mulroney for Leader Campaign
>
> --
>
> Caroline Mulroney Campaign
> 416-922-0573
> www.CarolineMulroney.ca
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Brown, Patrick"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:58:32 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive
> Conservatives" Tim Hudak and Christine Elliott never felt that I was
> worth talking to perhaps they should talk to each other about your
> pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Bo...
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
> mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
> pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
> Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.
>
> Regards,
>
> Patrick Brown, MPP
> Simcoe North
> Leader of the Official Opposition
>


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:49:39 -0400
Subject: Fwd: For the record the only MPP to return my calls Since
January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: info@rodformpp.ca, "carolyn.bennett"<carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>,
"Navdeep.Bains"<Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca>,
 "martine.turcotte"<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>, jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>,
 jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,  "jessica.hume"<jessica.hume@ontario.ca>,
Ezra@therebel.media, "Sophia.Harris"<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Rod Phillips
PO Box 31004 Westney Heights RPO
Ajax, Ontario L1T3V2
Tel: 289.275.2422
Tel: 1.888.ROD.4MPP
Fax: 289.275.2422



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:40:31 -0400
Subject: Fwd: For the record the only MPP to return my calls Since
January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: doug@fordnation.ca, tmccarthy@fmlaw.ca,
Gabriella.skubincan@patientombudsman.ca, ross.romano@pc.ola.org,
todd.smith@pc.ola.org, tabunsp-qp@ndp.on.ca, jvanthof-qp@ndp.on.ca,
bill.walker@pc.ola.org, jim.wilson@pc.ola.org,
john.yakabuski@pc.ola.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.fmlaw.ca/lawyers/christine-j-elliott/

https://patientombudsman.ca/About-Us/Patient-Ombudsmans-Message/Leadership-Team

@FordNationDougFord
doug@fordnation.ca
http://www.FordNation.ca
http://instagram.com/fordnationdougford
https://twitter.com/fordnation
• Official Facebook for Doug Ford & #FordNation • Past Toronto City
Councillor 🇨🇦
Cell 416.247.1061

 


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:33:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: For the record the only MPP to return my
calls Since January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier


Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,


Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario


Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:32:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: For the record the only MPP to return my
calls Since January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition



---------- Original message ----------
From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:32:58 -0800
Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: For the record the only MPP to return
my calls Since January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

(Français à suivre)

If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca

If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca

Thank you.

Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca

Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca

Merci.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:32:53 -0400
Subject: For the record the only MPP to return my calls Since January 19th was 

Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: caroline@carolinemulroney.ca, vic.fedeli@pc.ola.org,vic.fedelico@pc.ola.org, lisa.macleod@pc.ola.org,pmiller-qp@ndp.on.ca, norm.miller@pc.ola.org,
monte.mcnaughton@pc.ola.org, tnatyshak-qp@ndp.on.ca,
rick.nicholls@pc.ola.org, sam.oosterhoff@pc.ola.org,
randy.pettapiece@pc.ola.org, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
kwynne.mpp@liberal.ola.org, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
,
"jim.wilson"<jim.wilson@pc.ola.org>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
"patrick.brown"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>,
newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>

I told everyone byway of emails and voicemails that I publish everything I do.

So even if they can't find my emails all they have to do is type my
name and their email address into their favourite Internet search
engine in order to review what they can't find.

Mr Wilson's assistant can find the email I sent her boss and his many associates
within this blog


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/yo-bill-morneau-are-opposition-leaders.html

Friday, 19 January 2018

Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea
Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial
election?


http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/erin-o-toole-takes-pass-on-ontario-pc-leadership-endorses-christine-elliott-1.4516404


Erin O'Toole takes pass on Ontario PC leadership, endorses Christine Elliott

'She is ready to be premier right now,' MP tells CBC News

By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CBC NewsPosted: Feb 02, 2018 4:15 PM ET


Will Toronto help give Doug Ford a majority government?

NDP, PCs are looking to make gains in Toronto off the backs of the faltering Liberals



Éric Grenier· CBC News· Posted: Jun 02, 2018 4:00 AM ET

Ontario PC Leader Doug Ford campaigning in Toronto on May 20, where he hopes to make significant gains for his party. (Frank Gunn/Canadian Press)


Toronto could cast a decisive vote in Ontario's provincial election on Thursday. It could decide between a majority or a minority government.

The odds of a minority government are currently low: the CBC Poll Tracker estimates the chances of a majority government being elected at about 92 per cent. That's because the Liberals are projected to win so few seats that a minority government is mathematically unlikely.

More Liberal MPPs mean a higher likelihood of a minority government. And the best place for more Liberals to be elected is in Toronto.

The city has long been a Liberal bastion. The party has won the most votes and seats in the city in every election since 1999. In 2014, the Liberals took 49 per cent of the vote — a few points better than their performances in 2007 and 2011. The Progressive Conservatives and New Democrats trailed at some distance, with 23 and 22 per cent apiece.

The Liberals are the incumbents in almost all of Toronto's 25 ridings. Only two of those ridings elected NDP MPPs four years ago, and the PCs were shut out until they won a byelection in Scarborough in 2016.

But the Liberals are in serious trouble in the city and appear to be struggling to retain their 22 seats there.

According to the June 1 update of the Poll Tracker — an aggregation of all publicly available polling data — the Liberals' support has been cut by more than half in Toronto. They trail in third with 23 per cent, down 26 points from the 2014 provincial election.

Both Doug Ford's PCs and Andrea Horwath's New Democrats have benefited from that collapse, with the PCs up eight points to 31 per cent and the NDP up 18 points to 40 per cent. Half of those gains occurred in just the last week, at the expense of the Liberals.



The Greens follow with five per cent, while just one per cent of Torontonians say they will vote for another party. (Of the small parties, only the Libertarians are running in all ridings. No other small party is running even a half-slate.)

Liberal hopes for survival rest on Toronto


If the Liberals were losing support to just one party, they might have been able to hold on to one part of the city. Instead, they're poised to lose Toronto's downtown core to the New Democrats, while the Progressive Conservatives could win in the suburbs in North York, Etobicoke and Scarborough.

None of this leaves the Liberals with a lot of options.


Ontario Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne campaigning in Toronto on Wednesday. The party entered the election holding almost all of the city's seats. (Frank Gunn/Canadian Press)
The party is still in play in the three Don Valley ridings (including Don Valley West, where Kathleen Wynne is running for re-election) and in Toronto–St. Paul's. Liberals also might be able to hold on in three-way contests in some of the Scarborough ridings.

But it's difficult to lose more than half of your support and still win seats — even in ridings that were won by significant margins in 2014. And the Liberals lack incumbents in five of their 22 seats, having already lost higher-profile former cabinet ministers like Glen Murray and Eric Hoskins. This might make it even harder to secure these ridings — particularly in the context of the recent swing in support to the NDP from the Liberals.

Horwath was in Wynne's riding on Friday asking voters to back her party to block Ford's PCs — an invitation to voters to cast their ballots strategically. The swing suggests it's a message that could be resonating in Toronto.

NDP looking to grow from the centre out


The New Democrats traditionally have been able to count on a few seats in Toronto, particularly in the downtown core along Lake Ontario. But the party might be able to expand that beachhead deeper into the city — and perhaps turn some territory orange that might otherwise have turned blue.

Those downtown ridings — Beaches–East York, Davenport, Spadina–Fort York, Toronto Centre and University–Rosedale — are poised to flip to the New Democrats. But in addition to these seats in more traditionally NDP-friendly territory, the NDP also could pick up a few other seats from the Liberals outside of the party's traditional base of support, such as Humber River–Black Creek, Scarborough Centre, Scarborough Southwest, Scarborough–Rouge Park and York South–Weston.


Ontario NDP Leader Andrea Horwath was campaigning in Toronto on Friday. The NDP is leading in the polls in the city. (Nathan Denette/Canadian Press)
In those Scarborough seats, the contest might instead be between the NDP and the PCs, considering the steep drop in Liberal support.

The New Democrats need to be competitive in these parts of Toronto. While the downtown seats might help bulk up the party's caucus, it won't be enough to put the party into government. For that, the NDP would need to win seats outside of their traditional bases of support — both inside and outside of Toronto.

If New Democrats can't flip most of the seats in Scarborough toward them, they're unlikely to win the seats elsewhere they need to form a government.

Will Doug Ford help deliver Toronto?


For the Progressive Conservatives, however, Toronto might mean the difference between a majority and a minority government.

Ford's promise to PC members when he won the leadership race in March was that he could win in Toronto. Maybe he can't take all the credit — the party was polling about as well in Toronto before Ford took over — but he does seem to be delivering on his promise.

The PCs are on track for their best performance in the city since they last formed government under Mike Harris. The PCs could take seats from the Liberals in the Don Valley and Etobicoke (where Ford is running), as well as in Scarborough and North York. The party is in range of winning between seven and 15 seats in the region — a significant increase.
Those could be important seats. The PCs are currently projected to win 72 seats provincewide (though their likely range runs from 52 to 84). If the PCs win just seven seats in Toronto, that would drop them down to 65 — just above the threshold of 63 seats needed to form a majority government.

And if they are under-performing in Toronto, they'll probably under-perform enough to fall short in at least two other seats elsewhere in Ontario. And Ford might struggle to form a government in a minority legislature if doing so means winning the support of either Horwath or Wynne.

Only once in the last three decades have the Progressive Conservatives won more than seven seats in Toronto. If Toronto surpasses that amount a second time, Ford will almost certainly become Ontario's next premier.

About the Author

 


Éric Grenier
Politics and polls
Éric Grenier is a senior writer and the CBC's polls analyst. He was the founder of ThreeHundredEight.com and has written for The Globe and Mail, Huffington Post Canada, The Hill Times, Le Devoir, and L’actualité.




Wynne acknowledges election is lost, urges voters to ensure NDP or PC minority

Some polls suggest the Liberals could lose official party status with fewer than 8 seats

CBC News· Posted: Jun 02, 2018 10:58 AM ET 

Ontario Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne said that she's heard from voters that they are leery of PC Leader Doug Ford and don't trust the NDP to handle the province's finances. (Andrew Ryan/Canadian Press)

An emotional Kathleen Wynne on Saturday acknowledged that she will no longer be premier after the June 7 election and encouraged voters to elect Liberal candidates to prevent the NDP or PCs from securing a majority.

"Even though I won't be leading this province as premier, I care deeply about how it will be led," the Liberal leader said during a campaign stop in Toronto.

"People want change, but by and large they're confident about where Ontario stands and where Ontario is headed. For this reason — I heard this over and over again — many voters are worried about handing a blank cheque to either Doug Ford or the NDP," she continued.

She added that voters don't trust Progressive Conservative Leader Doug Ford and are concerned that an NDP government "will approach the responsibility of running Ontario's economy with a plan that is risky and unrealistic."

The only way to keep the province's next government on a "short leash," Wynne said, is to send as many Liberals to the Ontario Legislature as possible.






Wynne acknowledges Liberals won't win Ontario election




00:0006:48




Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne encourages voters to elect Liberal candidates to prevent the NDP or PCs from securing a majority 6:48


"The more Liberal MPPs we send to Queens Park on June 7, the less likely it becomes that either Doug Ford or the NDP will be able to form a majority government," Wynne said.

The Liberal leader has, until today, been defiant in the face of daunting poll numbers that suggest the Grits could lose official party status after the vote. In Ontario, parties need at least eight seats in the legislature to be formally recognized.

Public support for Wynne's Liberals has plummeted since the election started on May 9, and CBC's Poll Tracker indicates that even long-time strongholds like St. Paul's in Toronto and St. Catharines could be lost.

According to Wynne, a "confluence of things" led her to make her statement on Saturday. She said she's going to continue to work to get Liberal candidates elected and will make decisions about her future as leader of the party down the road.

She also conceded that some Liberal supporters may see the move as an early capitulation.

"I know there are Liberals who believe in us and believe in what we've been doing and some are going to be mad. Some are going to be sad," she said.  

Biting the political bullet, Wynne clears path for Liberals to campaign out of her shadow

Admission of defeat widely seen as a Hail Mary for Liberals to win enough seats to keep party status

CBC News· Posted: Jun 02, 2018 5:10 PM ET

An emotional Kathleen Wynne on Saturday acknowledged that she will no longer be premier after the June 7 election and encouraged voters to elect Liberal candidates to prevent the NDP or PCs from securing a majority. (CBC) 
Ontario Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne's surprise admission of defeat five days ahead of the election clears the path for her party's candidates to ditch the weight of the premier's unpopularity and race to the finish line on their own steam, many incumbent Liberals say.

In a stunning move Saturday, an emotional Wynne conceded her days as premier are over when voters head to the ballot box June 7 — but called on Ontarians to vote Liberal anyway, saying a vote for her party is a vote to keep the next government in check, be it one led by the NDP or the PCs.

At stake for the Liberals are eight seats, which they need to hang on to party status at a time when support has been floundering in the polls amid a virtually neck-in-neck race between the competition.

Wynne's move was a gamble.


'I've thought long and hard'


"I would never want to do anything that would undermine any of my candidates," Wynne told reporters. "I have thought long and hard about this, believe me."

It was a decision many candidates say caught them off guard.

"For me, it was just shocking," said Minister of Children and Youth Services Micheal Coteau, running for Don Valley East, who learned of the move on social media. Many others in the party found out during a conference call Saturday morning.


"There was less than half an hour, I would say, between finding out, and the announcement," said Coteau, who says his task remains to remind voters in a riding that voted 57 per cent in favour of the Grits in the last election, of the values for which the party stands.




Minister of Children and Youth Services Micheal Coteau, running for Don Valley East, said he learned of the move on social media, while many others in the party found out during a conference call Saturday morning. (CBC)


Many other party stalwarts, including Mitzie Hunter and Charles Sousa, told CBC News they too didn't know the move was in the works, with Hunter saying it was "unbelievable" to her when she first found out. But both called it a courageous act by a leader who wanted her party to move forward.

I'm not going to lie. It wasn't a boost in momentum for me.- Nadia  Guerrera ,  Parkdale-High  Park candidate
For first-time Parkdale-High Park candidate Nadia Guerrera, the news was doubly difficult. After all, it was less than a month ago that Guerrera's team got a phone call saying her office was going to be Wynne's first campaign stop.

Fast forward to Saturday, a conference call with the premier admitting she wasn't going to win.

"I'm not going to lie. It wasn't a boost in momentum for me. It was difficult for somebody that I respect," said Guerrera. "I can't imagine what she must be feeling right now. But there's work to do."

Public support for Wynne's Liberals has plummeted since the election started on May 9, and CBC's Poll Tracker indicates that even long-time strongholds like St. Paul's in Toronto and St. Catharines could be lost. Asked if there was a moment that prompted her to finally admit defeat, Wynne said the decision was the result of a "confluence of things."


A 'responsible' move, say some


Windsor West candidate Rino Bortolin says Wynne acknowledging she won't win enough votes to form government is part of her track record of making "tough decisions."


"When I've knocked on doors that they want to vote for me, they wanted my representation but they had reservations about supporting this government or supporting this premier. What this does is allows them to walk into the ballot box and vote for the person that they feel best represents their interests," Bortolin said. 

For first-time Parkdale-High Park candidate Nadia Guerrera, the news was doubly difficult. It was less than a month ago that Guerrera's team got a phone call saying her office was going to be Wynne’s first campaign stop. (CBC)
Liberal incumbent for Ottawa West-Nepean Bob Chiarelli expressed a similar view, calling the move "unusual," but one that was necessary "to protect the people of Ontario."

"Quite frankly, I thought it was practical. And it was responsible," he said of Wynne's political martyrdom.

"We want to take the concerns about Kathleen Wynne off the table and we want to say, 'What type of government do we want in Ontario, not particularly trying to defeat Kathleen Wynne' … I think people will understand why she did what she did."

Sudbury candidate Glenn Thibeault echoed that sentiment saying, "Yes, it took us all, I think, by surprise, but I think it's now the opportunity for us to say we can now go door to door, talk about the issues."

Whether Wynne's Hail Mary plea to voters to cast their ballot for her party is effective when there is no chance of a Liberal government remains to be seen.

But if her plan works, London North Centre candidate Kate Graham says, a minority government will be "a real opportunity" for a government that works across party lines.

A race to the finish … or maybe just survival


"It forces parties to work together," she told CBC News, something she believes will please many voters. Speaking with voters door to door, she says she's heard loud and clear that "people are not comfortable with any of the options."

"They don't want to hand the keys over to any single leader or party."

Ottawa Centre MPP and Attorney General Yasir Naqvi took the day's announcement into stride, saying he never takes an election for granted and this time is no different.

"I've worked as hard as I'm working this election," he said, calling Wynne's move a "courageous" one but difficult to hear.

Asked by reporters Saturday if she'll step down as party leader, Wynne wouldn't say, though some believe it's a foregone conclusion.

Windsor West candidate Rino Bortolin says Wynne acknowledging she won't win enough votes to form government is part of her track record of making 'tough decisions.' (CBC)
Couteau was among those eulogizing the premier's legacy following the announcement, remembering Wynne as his MPP growing in up Flemingdon Park who took a chance on him.

"I'm not the traditional guy who's brought into politics.… She gave me an opportunity to run, to be a part of that, to be a part of her cabinet. She was the person who helped bring me into the fold."
But whether campaigning without a viable candidate for premier helps secure the Liberals' survival or puts them underground remains to be seen. Whatever the outcome June 7, all eyes were surely on Wynne on Saturday.

"My coach Bonnie Parkhill said, 'You always had a really good kick, which is the last bit at the end," said a wistful Wynne, referring to her track coach. "So I'm going to use that. I'm going to use that for my candidates around the province." 

Wynne pinpoints the moment she realized she couldn't win YEA RIGHT She knew that long before the writ was dropped she just know how bad she was gonna lose

$
0
0

Wynne pinpoints the moment she realized she couldn't win

After admitting defeat over the weekend, Ontario's Liberal leader told CBC about when she realized it was over

Kate McGillivray· CBC News· Posted: Jun 04, 2018 6:05 AM ET


3860 Comments


John Kimble
 "POOF"
John Kimble
@Braden Walker meanwhile the ndp will make Ontario a sanctuary province. You can't make this stuff up

David Amos
David Amos
@John Kimble "You can't make this stuff up"

Methinks most folks blessed with common sense would not want to and take credit for doing so N'esy Pas?


Greg Lang 
Greg Lang
The fact that people are still voting Liberal AFTER Wynne has dropped out goes to show you what lemmings they are.


Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher
@Greg Lang "Saturday's emotional announcement"

Lol comes to show you who CBC is rooting for. Unbiased? Sure just keep telling yourself that lol.

David Amos
David Amos
@Frank Gallagher Methinks everybody knows the score no matter who CBC roots for N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@Pat Jones Methinks folks only further prove that they are lemmings if they allow others (liberals) to tell them how to vote That how Trudeau the Younger won such a big mandate N'esy Pas?

Greg Lang 
Cecile Lavas
Doug Ford has a solid lead and will win this election with a majority.


James Timberly
James Timberly
@Cecile Lavas "Doug Ford has a solid lead and will win this election with a majority"

His lead is not very big, and is only as solid as the Libs' grip on their remaining supporters. If that falters, it will be NDP in the end.

David Amos
David Amos
@James Timberly "His lead is not very big"

Methinks you should look at the polling results from another angle N'esy Pas?


Jonny Elleven
Jonny Elleven
@Kevin Delaney

or paid commenters.

David Amos
David Amos
@Jonny Elleven Methinks you hit the nail on the head N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@Frank Gallagher "Methinks this is more fake news from the Left."

YUP

Greg Lang 
Artie Gibson
Yep

After 15 years of McGuinty and herself destroying Ontario, all of a sudden decides to be honest folks.

It's more like a "deathbed confession".


David Amos
David Amos
@Artie Gibson "After 15 years of McGuinty and herself destroying Ontario, all of a sudden decides to be honest folks."

Methinks lots of folks must have laughed as hard as I when the lady liberal leader warned of the perils of a majority mandate N'esy Pas?


Greg Lang 
Jack Richards
The PC party need to win a majority otherwise Ontario could be stuck with a NDP Liberal coalition which would be a disaster and more of the same garbage.


David Amos
David Amos
@Jack Richards "Ontario could be stuck with a NDP Liberal coalition"

Methinks the NDP claimed that would never happen Nesy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Tim Klassen Methinks Petey MacKay and his cohorts did in the Progressive Conservative Party in 2003 The provincials merely use the name as the they follow the beat of the Harper drum N'esy Pas?


Kevin Delaney 
Kevin Delaney
The Liberals were never effectively rebuked for the sins of Dalton.
The Conservatives failed, time & time again to offer a sensible counter to the Liberals.
The Conservative backroom, played games at the last convention & failed again via Doug Ford.

Time for a re-boot in Ontario politics. A minority NDP Government of 18 to 24 months gets it done.


David Amos
David Amos
@Kevin Delaney Methinks it would be far more fun to watch a minority PC Government try to get things done N'esy Pas?

Kevin Delaney
Kevin Delaney
@David Amos
No. Ford needs to be tossed from the Ontario PCs asap.


David Amos
David Amos
@Kevin Delaney Methinks Elections Ontario should have been asking Mr Ford and his PC cohorts some pretty serious for about ten days or so Who cares if the Etobicoke Centre nomination went through an internal appeals process and was upheld by the PCs? Its the dudes that oversee his Party's actions who should be looking into this ussue N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-pc-memberships-audio-recording-kinga-surma-1.4675893

Doug Ford recorded trying to sell 'bogus' PC memberships, Liberals allege
Liberal campaign releases October 2016 audio recording at morning news conference
CBC News · Posted: May 24, 2018 10:49 AM ET


 Greg Lang 
Stew Gotz
Hopefully there will be Liberal indictments once Doug cracks open the cooked books.


David Amos
David Amos
@Stew Gotz "Hopefully there will be Liberal indictments once Doug cracks open the cooked books."

Methinks Ford's hero south of the 49th promised such things in 2016 and nothing has happened thus far N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree "The books are audited every year."

Methinks histry has proven that it matters very much who the auditors were N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amo
@Ronald McCallum Methinks nobody cares now that she has admitted she is history N'esy Pas?

Patrick Smyth 
Dean Melanson
one liberal government gone .... mr dressup is next .....


David Amos
David Amos
@Dean Melanson YUP


Rob Clayton 
ralph jacobs
Lots of people claim Ford hasn't put out anything on what he plans to do. I would like to know then where all the ads get their information that he will cut thousands of jobs and close multiple hospitals. If he hasn't said anything then this must be fake news.


David Amos
David Amos
@ralph jacobs "If he hasn't said anything then this must be fake news"

True


francis quinn 
Louisa Walker
As bad as the liberals got. You ain’t experienced nothing until you buy a Ford.


David Amos
David Amos
@Louisa Walker "You ain’t experienced nothing until you buy a Ford."

Methinks you bought the wrong Ford because they were the only car company that we did not bail out in 2008 so they must being doing something right N'esy Pas?


Gordon MacFarlane
Gordon MacFarlane
@Louisa Walker

My sister in Ottawa has said as much.

She is deeply disappointed in Wynne very concerned about Horvath and absolutely shocked the PCs elected Ford.

Still from a distance I consider Ford an upgrade to the man he replaced as leader of the PCs and his team an upgrade to the current govt.

Good luck to my friends and family in Ontario


David Amos
David Amos
@Gordon MacFarlane "Good luck to my friends and family in Ontario"

Even though my opinion means less than nothing to you methinks they are gonna need it bigtime N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@Neil Turv Methinks most folks prefer a subway particularly in the wintertime N'esy Pas?

francis quinn 
William T Fowler
Best choice for the economy and taxpayers is Doug Ford.

Don't trust Wynne or Horwath.


David Berg 
David Berg
  Do you really want more Ford? Save yourselves and the health care of your communities now while you still can.
Signed,
Manitoba 


David Amos
David Amos
@David Berg Manitoba???

Methinks that is the province that old Louis Riel helped create after he saved it from Canadian big business dudes selling to greedy Yankees. Later the RCMP hung him for his efforts to save Canada for the rest of us to enjoy N'esy Pas?


---------- Original message ----------
From: Ontario Liberal Party <info@ontarioliberal.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 18:04:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Wynne Biting the political bullet After
reading enough in CBC I called a lot of you people yesterday and
nobody gave a damn Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Ontario Liberal Party.

We will endeavour to get back to you as soon as possible.

For media enquiries, please contact us at communications@ontarioliberal.ca.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact us.

Sincerely,

The Ontario Liberal Party Team

---------- Original message ----------
From: Ontario Liberal Party <info@ontarioliberal.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 18:04:17 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Wynne Biting the political bullet After
reading enough in CBC I called a lot of you people yesterday and
nobody gave a damn Correct?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting the Ontario Liberal Party.

We will endeavour to get back to you as soon as possible.

For media enquiries, please contact us at communications@ontarioliberal.ca.

Thank you again for taking the time to contact us.

Sincerely,

The Ontario Liberal Party Team


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 14:04:11 -0400
Subject: Re Wynne Biting the political bullet After reading enough in
CBC I called a lot of you people yesterday and nobody gave a damn
Correct?
To: communications@ontarioliberal.ca, info@jessspindler.ca,
info@ontarioliberal.ca, leccecampaign@gmail.com, info@romanbaber.ca,
paul@calandra.ca, gurratan.singh@ontariondp.ca, Helena@votehelena.ca,
marilynkingvaughan@gmail.com, andrea4yorkcentre@gmail.com,
info@voteramon.ca, votejoanndavis@gmail.com,
jessica.bell@ontariondp.ca, Outreach@gilliansmith.ca,
jill.andrew@ontariondp.ca, dwayne.morgan@ontariondp.ca,
info@chinlee.ca, zeyd.bismilla@ontariondp.ca, nadia@nadiaguerrera.ca,
bhutila.karpoche@ontariondp.ca, info@voteqaadri.ca,
support@votedenzil.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, news@nowtoronto.com,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/biting-the-political-bullet-wynne-clears-path-for-liberals-to-campaign-out-of-her-shadow-1.4689343

Biting the political bullet, Wynne clears path for Liberals to
campaign out of her shadow
Admission of defeat widely seen as a Hail Mary for Liberals to win
enough seats to keep party status
CBC News · Posted: Jun 02, 2018 5:10 PM ET

Ontario Election 2018: 16 make-or-break races in the 416 and 905

It’s in seat-rich Toronto and the 905 that Ontario Election 2018 will
be won or lost on June 7. Here's a look inside the closest races in
the GTA.
by Enzo DiMatteo May 31, 2018

https://nowtoronto.com/news/ontario-election-416-905-ridings/

https://nowtoronto.com/news/ontario-election-10-ridings-to-watch-in-toronto/

https://nowtoronto.com/news/Ontario-Election-10-ridings-to-watch-in-the-905/

Enzo DiMatteo
EDITORIAL DIRECTOR

Enzo was born in Belgium and emigrated with his family to Canada in
the heat of Trudeaumania. He grew up in the city’s west end and cut
his teeth in journalism in the 90s covering cop stories and whatever
madness skinheads in the neo-Nazi movement were up to. He is a winner
of numerous writing awards and the only (alleged) Commie banned from
entering Cuba. It’s complicated. Claims to fame: champion
wood-chopper.

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/06/out-of-gate-today-cbc-and-buddies-in.html

Saturday, 2 June 2018
Out of the gate today CBC and their buddies in VIAFOURA proved my
point in spades about just how crooked they are N'esy Pas?


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2018 16:33:41 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Premier Wynne or the record Joel Harden
of the NDP was the only plitcal animal to respond to my emails Tweets
and phone calls but obviously did so only to hustle me
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier


Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,


Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario


Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Green Party of Ontario <admin@gpo.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 06:37:28 -0700
Subject: Thank you! Re: Re Paul Fromm Candidate in Etobicoke Centre???
YEA RIGHT Well Baker can still keep his seat if he is ethical N'esy
Pas Dougy Baby Ford?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you very much for your interest in the Green Party of Ontario.

I hope you appreciate that we make every effort to respond to
inquiries. However, our resources are limited, we cannot reply to
every email promptly.

Please note that your support is important to us.

To find your candidate, please visit: https://gpo.ca/find-candidate/

You can donate, volunteer or request a sign online.

If you are interested to check out our policy, please visit our
website at www.gpo.ca/vision.

Our fully costed platform can be found here: https://gpo.ca/our-platform/

*********************************************************************************

Merci pour votre intérêt pour le Parti Vert de l’Ontario.

Nous espérons que vous appréciez nos efforts pour répondre à vos
attentes. Cependant, nos ressources étant limitées, nous pourrions ne
pas répondre à tous les courriels aussi vite que nous le voudrions.

Votre support nous est très important.

Retrouvez votre candidat sur https://gpo.ca/find-candidate/

Si notre projet vous intéresse, vous pouvez visiter notre site
internet sur www.gpo.ca/vision.

Notre programme budgété est consultable sur
https://gpo.ca/wp-content/uploads/Parti%20Vert%20de%20l'Ontario%20Programme%202018%20May19.pdf



--
Green Party of Ontario
PO Box 1132 Stn F
Toronto, ON M4Y 2T8
Local: 416-977-7476
Tollfree: 1-888-647-3366
Fax: 416-977-5476
Email: admin@gpo.ca
Website: www.gpo.ca



---------- Original message ----------
From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 07:15:14 -0700
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Re Paul Fromm Candidate in
Etobicoke Centre??? YEA RIGHT Well Baker can still keep his seat if he
is ethical N'esy Pas Dougy Baby Ford?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Thank you for your email. A member of our team will get back to you as
soon as possible.

Warm regards,

Team Caroline


--

Caroline Mulroney Campaign
905-960-1457
www.CarolineMulroney.ca
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/carolinemulroneyPC/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/C_Mulroney



---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:15:16 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Paul Fromm Candidate in Etobicoke
Centre??? YEA RIGHT Well Baker can still keep his seat if he is
ethical N'esy Pas Dougy Baby Ford?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier


Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,


Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario


Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.


---------- Original message ----------
From: Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:15:15 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Paul Fromm Candidate in Etobicoke
Centre??? YEA RIGHT Well Baker can still keep his seat if he is
ethical N'esy Pas Dougy Baby Ford?
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com


Thank you for contacting the office of the Honourable Navdeep Bains, P.C., M.P.
Inquiries related to Ministry of Innovation, Science and Economic Development:
If you are contacting our office for matters concerning the Ministry
of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, please contact them
directly at ised.minister-ministre.isde@canada.caised.minister-ministre.isde@canada.ca
>

Event and Meeting Request in the Greater Toronto Hamilton Area:
If you are contacting us to invite the Hon. Navdeep Bains, MP to an
event in Mississauga - Malton or the Greater Toronto - Hamilton Area,
kindly follow the link below to complete the invitation form, and
we will be happy to advice on his availability closer to the date of
the event:  NavdeepBains.MP/services/<https://www.navdeepbains.mp/services/>

Constituents of Mississauga - Malton:
Our office is happy to process your request, and we will connect with
you shortly.Please do not hesitate to reach out to us anytime at
905-564-0228.


Regards,

The office of the Honourable Navdeep Bains, P.C.
Member of Parliament for Mississauga - Malton



---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 14:15:27 +0000
Subject: RE: Re Paul Fromm Candidate in Etobicoke Centre??? YEA RIGHT
Well Baker can still keep his seat if he is ethical N'esy Pas Dougy
Baby Ford?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 10:15:10 -0400
Subject: Re: Re Paul Fromm Candidate in Etobicoke Centre??? YEA RIGHT
Well Baker can still keep his seat if he is ethical N'esy Pas Dougy
Baby Ford?
To: doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, Kory@fordnation.ca,
ybaker.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org, erica.kelly@ontariondp.ca, paul
<paul@paulfromm.com>, warren <warren@daisygroup.ca>,
bmilner@gsfpartners.com, bmummery@gsfpartners.com, shawnrizvi@gpo.ca,
admin@gpo.ca, media@gpo.ca, info@rodformpp.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
<carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, "Navdeep.Bains"
<Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"
<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, ddale
<ddale@thestar.ca>, jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, jesse
<jesse@jessebrown.ca>, Ezra , "Sophia.Harris"
<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>, "jessica.hume"<jessica.hume@ontario.ca>,
Gabriella.skubincan@patientombudsman.ca, caroline@carolinemulroney.ca,
Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, Hannah.Thibedeau@cbc.ca, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Newsroom
<Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Brian Ruhe <brian@brianruhe.ca>

You can bet dimes to dolllars I just called the Ontarion PC Party and
talked about Paul Fromm et al

https://www.facebook.com/pg/ontariopc/about/?ref=page_internal

(416) 861-0020

Here is one of the many reasons why

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/ontario-provincial-election-feds-1.4655519

How the Ontario election is a warm-up act for the 2019 federal campaign
In staffing, tactics and policy, there's a lot of carry-over between
the federal and provincial operations
Hannah Thibedeau · CBC News · Posted: May 09, 2018 4:51 PM ET

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 13:37:31 +0000
Subject: RE: Re Paul Fromm Candidate in Etobicoke Centre??? YEA RIGHT
Well Baker can still keep his seat if he is ethical N'esy Pas Dougy
Baby Ford?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 13:37:30 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Paul Fromm Candidate in Etobicoke
Centre??? YEA RIGHT Well Baker can still keep his seat if he is
ethical N'esy Pas Dougy Baby Ford?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier


Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,


Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario


Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:49:39 -0400
Subject: Fwd: For the record the only MPP to return my calls Since
January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: info@rodformpp.ca, "carolyn.bennett"<carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>,
"Navdeep.Bains"<Navdeep.Bains@parl.gc.ca>, "martine.turcotte"
<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, ddale
<ddale@thestar.ca>, jesse <jesse@viafoura.com>, jesse
<jesse@jessebrown.ca>, "jessica.hume"<jessica.hume@ontario.ca>, Ezra
, "Sophia.Harris"<Sophia.Harris@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Rod Phillips
PO Box 31004 Westney Heights RPO
Ajax, Ontario L1T3V2
Tel: 289.275.2422
Tel: 1.888.ROD.4MPP
Fax: 289.275.2422



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 15:40:31 -0400
Subject: Fwd: For the record the only MPP to return my calls Since
January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: doug@fordnation.ca, tmccarthy@fmlaw.ca,
Gabriella.skubincan@patientombudsman.ca, ross.romano@pc.ola.org,
todd.smith@pc.ola.org, tabunsp-qp@ndp.on.ca, jvanthof-qp@ndp.on.ca,
bill.walker@pc.ola.org, jim.wilson@pc.ola.org,
john.yakabuski@pc.ola.org
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.fmlaw.ca/lawyers/christine-j-elliott/

https://patientombudsman.ca/About-Us/Patient-Ombudsmans-Message/Leadership-Team

@FordNationDougFord
doug@fordnation.ca
http://www.FordNation.ca
http://instagram.com/fordnationdougford
https://twitter.com/fordnation
• Official Facebook for Doug Ford & #FordNation • Past Toronto City
Councillor 🇨🇦
Cell 416.247.1061


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:33:00 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: For the record the only MPP to return my
calls Since January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier


Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,


Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario


Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:32:59 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: For the record the only MPP to return my
calls Since January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition


---------- Original message ----------
From: Brian Gallant <briangallant10@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 10:32:58 -0800
Subject: Merci / Thank you Re: For the record the only MPP to return
my calls Since January 19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

(Français à suivre)

If your email is pertaining to the Government of New Brunswick, please
email me at brian.gallant@gnb.ca

If your matter is urgent, please email Greg Byrne at greg.byrne@gnb.ca

Thank you.

Si votre courriel s'addresse au Gouvernement du Nouveau-Brunswick,
‎svp m'envoyez un courriel à brian.gallant@gnb.ca

Pour les urgences, veuillez contacter Greg Byrne à greg.byrne@gnb.ca

Merci.



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 14:32:53 -0400
Subject: For the record the only MPP to return my calls Since January
19th was Mr Wilson's assistant (416 325 2069)
To: caroline@carolinemulroney.ca, vic.fedeli@pc.ola.org,
vic.fedelico@pc.ola.org, lisa.macleod@pc.ola.org,
pmiller-qp@ndp.on.ca, norm.miller@pc.ola.org,
monte.mcnaughton@pc.ola.org, tnatyshak-qp@ndp.on.ca,
rick.nicholls@pc.ola.org, sam.oosterhoff@pc.ola.org,
randy.pettapiece@pc.ola.org, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
kwynne.mpp@liberal.ola.org, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "jim.wilson"
<jim.wilson@pc.ola.org>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "patrick.brown"
<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
"brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>

I told everyone byway of emails and voicemails that I publish everything I do.

So even if they can't find my emails all they have to do is type my
name and their email address into their favourite Internet search
engine in order to review what they can't find.

Mr Wilson's assistant can find the email I sent her boss and his many associates
within this blog


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/yo-bill-morneau-are-opposition-leaders.html

Friday, 19 January 2018

Yo Bill Morneau are the opposition leaders Patrick Brown and Andrea
Horwath even remotely concerned about the upcoming provincial
election?


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:42:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Vic Fedeli I just called and left a
message Methinks somebody should remind Premier Wynne, Patrick Brown
and Andrea Horwath of the email I published last week Nesy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier

Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,

Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario

Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.


Here is just one example that Christine Elliott should pay attention
to ASAP it can be found within this blog

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/round-two-of-cbc-wicked-games-with.html

Saturday, 27 January 2018

Round Two of CBC wicked games with the Conservatives in Ontario for
the benefit of LIEbranos

Wynne pinpoints the moment she realized she couldn't win

After admitting defeat over the weekend, Ontario's Liberal leader told CBC about when she realized it was over

Kate McGillivray· CBC News· Posted: Jun 04, 2018 6:05 AM ET

Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne spoke with CBC's Metro Morning on Monday about her admission of defeat ahead of Ontario's election. (CBC)




Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne says she can pinpoint the moment she realized she wouldn't have a chance of winning the Ontario election.

It was just after the final leaders' debate, held at CBC's Toronto headquarters on May 27.

"I think I did pretty well in the debate," she said during an interview on Metro Morning on Monday. 
Those discouraging poll numbers, showing the Liberals trailing far behind the Progressive Conservatives and NDP for Thursday's vote, "meant that we needed to be honest with people that we're not going to be the government," she said.

Then came Saturday's emotional announcement, when Wynne acknowledged she would not return as premier.

So what does that mean for Liberal candidates?

Disputing the idea that she was throwing them under the bus or giving Ontarians tacit permission to vote for the NDP, Wynne said Monday she made Saturday's announcement because she "needed to get myself out of the way."

"What I've said to them is, 'Look, this is going to help you in your ridings,'" she said. ​

Paving the way for a PC majority?

Wynne said voters are expressing anxiety at the prospect of an NDP or PC government, but that "there is another way."

"Here's what I know: the more Liberals we can elect, the more chance there won't be an NDP or Conservative majority," she said.

But an hour after Wynne appeared on Metro Morning, NDP Leader Andrea Horwath came out swinging, charging Wynne with asking Ontarians to play a "risky game" that could put the Progressive Conservatives in power.


Poll averages according to CBC's poll tracker on June 4, 2018. (CBC)
"I just fear that if people don't think about what she's asking, which is basically to likely put Doug Ford in the premier's chair, then we could be in a serious situation," Horwath told Metro Morning host Matt Galloway, calling Wynne's announcement both surprising and "disappointing."

CBC's poll tracker indicates the NDP has a narrow lead over the PC Party, but continues to favour Ford's party to win a majority government due to a better regional distribution of votes.

Wynne still wants to be an MPP 


Until this weekend's admission, Wynne had been defiant in the face of daunting poll numbers that suggest the Liberal Party could lose official party status after the vote. In Ontario, parties need at least eight seats to be formally recognized.

On Monday, Wynne reaffirmed that regardless of how her party fares on election day, she would like to continue to serve in Don Valley West, where she was first elected as MPP in 2003.
"This is the community that I love," she told Galloway. "I want to continue to represent them."



http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-pc-memberships-audio-recording-kinga-surma-1.4675893 


Doug Ford recorded trying to sell 'bogus' PC memberships, Liberals allege

Liberal campaign releases October 2016 audio recording at morning news conference




Liberals release audio recording of Doug Ford allegedly trying to sell bogus PC memberships

00:0001:18
 



Doug Ford can be heard attempting to sign up new members with Etobicoke Centre PC candidate Kinga Surma, Liberals allege 1:18


The Ontario Liberals released an audio recording on Thursday that features Doug Ford allegedly trying to sell "bogus memberships" to help secure the nomination of the Progressive Conservative candidate in his home riding.

In the edited audio recording presented by Liberal campaign co-chair Deb Matthews, the PC leader is heard alongside Etobicoke Centre PC candidate Kinga Surma attempting to sign up new party members to support Surma in her nomination contest.
Matthews said the audio, which she said was recorded in an Etobicoke Tim Hortons in October 2016, when Ford was not leader of the party, was provided to the Liberal campaign by the man who recorded it. Matthews said the man wants to remain anonymous and would not divulge any further information about the provenance of the recording.

She added that a longer version of the audio exists and offered to provide it to journalists.
On the tape, Ford and Surma can be heard telling residents of Etobicoke Centre — Ford's home riding — that it "won't cost ya anything" to sign up and that the forms could be left partially blank.
"You don't have to fill that out. She'll take your name, number; just sign it," Ford can be heard saying.
PC Party memberships are not free, and Matthews said the audio raises questions about who exactly was paying for the new members. According to PC Party rules, memberships cannot be given as gifts.
Matthews also alleges that if someone else was paying for the memberships, it could constitute "secret donations," which are banned by Ontario's election finances law. She stopped short of asserting Ford paid for the memberships.

Pressed by reporters, Matthews said the Liberals took multiple steps to verify the authenticity of the recording, but she did not elaborate on what that process included.



 Kinga Surma, left, the PC candidate in Etobicoke Centre, was a staffer in the administration of former Toronto mayor Rob Ford, Doug Ford's late brother. (@KingaSurma2018/Instagram)
"According to this new evidence, Mr. Ford was involved directly in the sale of bogus memberships on behalf of Ms. Surma," she said.

"These practices contradict the rules and regulations that Mr. Ford as leader has pledged to enforce."
Surma, a former Toronto city hall staffer for Ford's late brother Rob Ford, defeated lawyer

Pina Martino in the Etobicoke Centre nomination race. Martino was formerly a deputy chief of staff to two PC Party leaders and maintains a high profile among party insiders.

At the news conference, Matthews also provided a 2016 affidavit from Martino in which she says she encountered several people on the PC membership list who maintained they had not signed any forms or paid any fees.

Ford had, however, invited them to the nomination meeting, according to the affidavit from Martino.
She also alleged that Ford once intimidated her by following her home, but Ford denied those accusations at a campaign stop in Tillsonburg, Ont., on Thursday morning.

"No, that never happened," he said.

Liberals trying to distract from issues, Ford says


Ford said the release of the audio is an attempt by the Liberals to "change the channel" two weeks before the June 7 election. He did not deny the veracity of the recording but said the events happened almost two years ago. He also said that he has never paid for another person's party membership.

He added that the Etobicoke Centre nomination went through an internal appeals process and was upheld by the PCs.

"It went through an appeals process," he said. "The appeal was totally dismissed...This is the Liberals two weeks before an election trying to change the channel on their mismanagement, scandal and waste."



Doug Ford answers questions about membership allegations
00:0000:15

 
Doug Ford says this old issue "went through the appeals process and was totally dismissed' 0:15
When asked why he would go to such lengths to support Surma, Ford said his family has campaigned for PC candidates in the riding for 30 years. He also claimed that he once donated money to Martino before he chose to support Surma in the race.

The release of the audio excerpts comes as Ford tries to fend off accusations that some PC candidates may have used data stolen from 407 ETR to further their campaigns. The party's former candidate in Brampton East, Simmer Sandhu, was forced to resign over his alleged links to the stolen customer data.

On the campaign trail, Ford has said repeatedly that he has no knowledge that any other candidates have any links to the data breach and says he would act immediately in the face of credible allegations.

Now I have some questions about the ethics of the Washington State Bar Association and their friend Patrick Doran

$
0
0


  1. Replying to
    Perhaps I should call your people now? 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy6FJQyYUZw



Update from Washington State Bar Association

12 views
30Share

Published on Jun 4, 2018
I got a follow up from the Washington State Bar Association. The matter is closed, and no further action will be taken. It's disappointing, but not surprising.
  1. Join us Wednesday for the WSBA Diversity and Inclusion Celebration –– Where We’ve Been, Where We’re going: five years into the Diversity and Inclusion Plan.


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 21:45:44 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Sean Davis we just talked about the ethics of
Washington State Bar Association and their friend Patrick Doran
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
message sera examin? avec attention.
Merci!
L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
S?curit? publique Canada
*********

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
carefully reviewed.
Thank you!
Ministerial Correspondence Unit
Public Safety Canada


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:45:21 -0400
Subject: Attn Sean Davis we just talked about the ethics of Washington State Bar Association
and their friend Patrick Doran
To: Seand@wsba.org, Saran@wsba.org, mdcohen212 <mdcohen212@gmail.com>,
douge@wsba.org, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
mrichard<mrichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
"Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>

Paula Littlewood
Executive Director
206-733-5950 | paulal@wsba.org
voicemail only

Sean Davis
General Counsel, Director of the Office of General Counsel
206-733-5944 | Seand@wsba.org

Sara Niegowski
Chief Communications & Outreach Officer
206-733-5930 | Saran@wsba.org

Jean McElroy
Chief Regulatory Counsel, Director of Regulatory Services Department
206-727-8277 | jeanm@wsba.org

Doug Ende
Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Director of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel
206-727-8275 | douge@wsba.org

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:16:05 -0400
Subject: Now I have some questions about the ethics of the Washington State Bar Association
and their friend Patrick Doran

To: paulal@wsba.org, Questions@wsba.org, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>,
cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,
ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pol4982 ,
pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, thomas@1000notes.com,
"misandry.happens"<misandry.happens@gmail.com>,
David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/06/now-i-have-some-questions-about-ethics.html


Monday, 4 June 2018

Now I have some questions about the ethics of the Washington State Bar
Association and their friend Patrick Doran

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeLPreKX1JQ

Misandry Today Admits To Sharing The Mad Shangi's Dox
1,581 views
Cognitive Thought
Streamed live on Mar 14, 2018
Joining me is VampKandy & Sinatra.

 9 Comments

David Amos
2 months ago
The RCMP can bet our thin Canadian dimes to fat Yankee petrodollars
that I saved this video and the FBI know why

David Amos
2 months ago
I hear you people talking about Glen Canning and I dealing with your
pal Patrick Doran you can bet I contacted the cops AGAIN

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/nobody-safe-from-edmonton-blogger-charged-with-hate-crime-1.4161015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy6FJQyYUZw

Update from Washington State Bar Association
9 views
Mad Shangi
Published on Jun 4, 2018
I got a follow up from the Washington State Bar Association. The
matter is closed, and no further action will be taken. It's
disappointing, but not surprising.

https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/David_Raymond_Amos

https://www.wsba.org/about-wsba/who-we-are

Our Mission

The mission of the Washington State Bar Association is to serve the
public and the members of the Bar, to ensure the integrity of the
legal profession, and to champion justice.

The Washington State Bar Association is part of the judicial branch,
exercising a governmental function authorized by the Washington
Supreme Court to license the state’s more than 38,000 legal
professionals. The WSBA both regulates lawyers under the authority of
the Court and serves its members as a professional association — all
without public funding.

As a regulatory agency, the WSBA administers the bar admission
process, including the bar exam; provides record-keeping and licensing
functions; and administers the professional discipline system. As a
professional association, the WSBA also provides continuing legal
education for attorneys, in addition to numerous other educational and
member-services and opportunities to advance professionally.
Governance and Leadership

The Board of Governors is WSBA's governing body charged with
determining the general policies of the Bar and approving its annual
budget. The Board consists of the president, president-elect, and
immediate past president and members elected from each Congressional
District and three at-large positions.

The Board of Governors elects the president-elect of the Bar and
selects the executive director.


Questions? Contact our knowledgeable Service Center representatives or
key support contacts. We are here to assist you 8 a.m.–5 p.m. Monday
through Friday.

Phone
Toll-free: 800-945-9722
Local: 206-443-9722

Email
Questions@wsba.org

Fax
206-727-8316 – Main
206-727-8325 – Office of Disciplinary Counsel
206-727-8313 – Regulatory Services, Licensing and Admissions




> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice

On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:25:46 -0400
Subject: YO "Misandry Today" your pal "Thomas" or anyone else can go
to the 52 minute mark of this hearing held about 2 weeks before Barry
Winters was finally arrested and listen to me mention Patrick Doran's
malicous work within Encylopedia Dramatic
To: Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1
<patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, thomas <thomas@1000notes.com>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, cps
<cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor
<themayor@calgary.ca>

https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown

Then his fellow Trolls should check Doran's work in ED

https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/David_Raymond_Amos

Nobody can deny that he provides the entire text of my lawsuit srcoll
down to Paragraph 75 to reqd the following statement AGAIN Do you not
see Doran and Wnters named???



75.  The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
“Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
Winters and his blogs.


BTW the DavidRayAmos Troll attacking using my name is not me. I was
not aware of Doran in ED until Barry Winters blogged about it

I suspect it was the same Troll who created the ED webpage that you
used to source your bullshit about me from

The reason I CC'd the universe and many cops in particular is because
I am filing a lawsuit about the shit.

In a nutshell Doran is a shill for the Calgary cops Get it yet?

On 3/31/18, Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> Thank you for directing your email to me specifically so I can respond.
>
> Please do not take my lack of response to your prior emails as a form of
> disrespect, its not. However, after reading your prior emails, I was unable
> to decipher who your message was specifically directed it.
>
> Was there something specific you wanted to discuss? Or were you just
> notifying me on the links and info included in this most recent email?
>
> Also, is there a reason the known universe is CC'd?
>
> Again, I'm not being disrespectful, but I know very little about you and
> your history with Patrick Doran, other than there was some sort of feud.
>
> Can you provide me some history and context?
>
> Respectfully,
> DDJ
>
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:37 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/03/yo-misandry-today-does-this-
>> email-suit.html
>>
>>
>> Saturday, 31 March 2018
>> Yo "Misandry Today" does this email suit a noname Yankee paralegal's
>> demand of me that he quickly deleted?
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oXO47CdGkA
>>
>>
>> LEGALLY PWNED: MISANDRY TODAY (DDJ)
>> 99 views
>> 15 1 Share
>>
>> Mad Shangi
>> Published on Mar 29, 2018
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:32:01 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by
>> two Jewish groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or
>> the Attorney General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>
>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>
>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>> mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca
> or call 613-957-4222.
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>> Vancouver Granville.
>>
>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>
>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>
>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>
>> Merci
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:32:13 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by
>> two Jewish groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or
>> the Attorney General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale  (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:32:08 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by
>> two Jewish groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or
>> the Attorney General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>> Merci!
>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>> S?curit? publique Canada
>> *********
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>> Thank you!
>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>> Public Safety Canada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "DIXON, MICHAEL"<michael.dixon@blakes.com>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:32:07 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by
>> two Jewish groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or
>> the Attorney General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I am out of the office, returning Monday, April 9th, and will have
>> limited access to email.
>>
>> I will respond to your message as soon as I am able to.
>>
>> If you require immediate assistance, please contact my assistant,
>> Renee Dubeau, at 403-663-2261.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Michael Dixon
>> Partner
>> michael.dixon@blakes.com<mailto:michael.dixon@blakes.com>
>> Dir:   403-260-9786
>> Cell:  403-978-8880
>>
>>
>> ____________
>>
>> [cid:image68665e.GIF@d39c98cd.41a63db7]
>>
>>
>>
>> Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
>> 855 - 2nd Street S.W., Suite 3500, Calgary AB T2P 4J8
>> Tel: 403-260-9600  Fax: 403-260-9700
>> blakes.com<http://blakes.com> | Twitter<http://twitter.com/BlakesLaw>
>> | Unsubscribe<http://www.blakes.com/English/Resources/
>> Bulletins/Pages/unsubscribe.aspx>
>>
>>
>> Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP | Barristers & Solicitors | Patent &
>> Trade-mark Agents
>> This email communication is CONFIDENTIAL AND LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone
>> number shown above or by return email and delete this communication
>> and any copy immediately. Thank you.
>>
>>
>> L'information paraissant dans ce message électronique est
>> CONFIDENTIELLE. Si ce message vous est parvenu par erreur, veuillez
>> immédiatement m’en aviser par téléphone ou par courriel et en détruire
>> toute copie. Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 09:31:52 -0400
>> Subject: Fwd: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by two Jewish
>> groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or the Attorney
>> General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> To: misandry.happens@gmail.com, thomas <thomas@1000notes.com>,
>> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"
>> <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, "Kevin.leahy"<Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
>> patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, "Paul.Lynch"
>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>,
>> cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>, jkee
>> <jkee@google.com>, DDrummond <DDrummond@google.com>,
>> brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "hon.ralph.goodale"
>> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Roshan.Pinto"
>> <Roshan.Pinto@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, ethics-ethique
>> <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Liliana.Longo"
>> <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"
>> <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"
>> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin"
>> <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "brian.gallant"
>> <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>,
>> "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre
>> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, newsroom
>> <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, nmoore
>> <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,
>> "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
>> <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>, "martine.turcotte"
>> <martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, "leanne.murray"
>> <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
>> Mark.Potok@splcenter.org, PAUL.SCHABAS@blakes.com, "Furey, John"
>> <jfurey@nbpower.com>, IRIS.FISCHER@blakes.com,
>> michael.dixon@blakes.com
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Mark Potok <Mark.Potok@splcenter.org>
>> Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 13:16:31 +0000
>> Subject: Re: Hey Arty Baby if you use another man's words you really
>> should say his name or are you just like your blogging butt buddy Mr
>> Baconfat?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Take me off your list now, David, or I'll be forced to take some action.
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> On 9/3/13 6:25 PM, "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > No Way José! You zionist must have figured out by now that I want to
>> > argue your lawyers in my stomping grounds.
>> >
>> > There is noway in Hell a mindless provincial Attorney General and two
>> > sets of questionable Jewhish grooups have any sort of mandate to set
>> > public policy in Canada for the benefit of sneaky Yankees in the Deep
>> > South
>> >
>> > Furthermore Your buddy Fogel already threathened litigation against me
>> > before talking the the former BLOC MP who is now his General Counsel.
>> > He and his buddy Irwin Cotler should have reviewed the stuff I sent
>> > them before we all ran in the election of the el38th Parliament while
>> > the Attorney General of New Brunswick and cohorts were busy illegally
>> > banishing me from Legislative properties
>> >
>> > Are we clear?
>> >
>> > If not read the pdf files you already have that Fogel and the boys
>> > admitted receiving and found so offensive
>> >
>> > Veritas Vincit
>> > David Raymond Amos
>> > 902 800 0369
>> >
>> > On 9/3/13, Mark Potok <Mark.Potok@splcenter.org> wrote:
>> >> Unsubscribe me from your emails, please.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 9/2/13 9:17 PM, "David Amos"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Tut Tut Tut
>> >>>
>> >>> http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=3340
>> >>>
>> >>> See how easy it is to be ethical? And this ain't even my blog
>> >>>
>> >>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/hungary-
>> sheds-bankers-shackles-b
>> >>> y.
>> >>> html
>> >>>
>> >>> Tuesday, 27 August 2013
>> >>> Hungary Sheds Bankers' Shackles | By Ronald L. Ray
>> >>>
>> >>> http://americanfreepress.net/?p=12418
>> >>>
>> >>> Hungary Sheds Bankers' Shackles
>> >>> August 23, 2013 AFP
>> >>>
>> >>> • International Monetary Fund told to vacate the country; nation now
>> >>> issuing debt-free money
>> >>>
>> >>> By Ronald L. Ray
>> >>>
>> >>> Hungary is making history of the first order.
>> >>>
>> >>> Not since the 1930s in Germany has a major European country dared to
>> >>> escape from the clutches of the Rothschild-controlled international
>> >>> banking cartels. This is stupendous news that should encourage
>> >>> nationalist patriots worldwide to increase the fight for freedom from
>> >>> financial tyranny.
>> >>>
>> >>> Already in 2011, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán promised to
>> >>> serve justice on his socialist predecessors, who sold the nation's
>> >>> people into unending debt slavery under the lash of the International
>> >>> Monetary Fund (IMF) and the terrorist state of Israel. Those earlier
>> >>> administrations were riddled with Israelis in high places, to the
>> >>> fury
>> >>> of the masses, who finally elected Orbán's Fidesz party in response.
>> >>>
>> >>> According to a report on the German-language website "National
>> >>> Journal," Orbán has now moved to unseat the usurers from their
>> >>> throne.
>> >>> The popular, nationalistic prime minister told the IMF that Hungary
>> >>> neither wants nor needs further "assistance" from that proxy of the
>> >>> Rothschild-owned Federal Reserve Bank. No longer will Hungarians be
>> >>> forced to pay usurious interest to private, unaccountable central
>> >>> bankers.
>> >>>
>> >>> Instead, the Hungarian government has assumed sovereignty over its
>> >>> own
>> >>> currency and now issues money debt free, as it is needed. The results
>> >>> have been nothing short of remarkable. The nation's economy, formerly
>> >>> staggering under deep indebtedness, has recovered rapidly and by
>> >>> means
>> >>> not seen since National Socialist Germany.
>> >>>
>> >>> The Hungarian Economic Ministry announced that it has, thanks to a
>> >>> "disciplined budget policy," repaid on August 12, 2013, the remaining
>> >>> €2.2B owed to the IMF—well before the March 2014 due date. Orbán
>> >>> declared: "Hungary enjoys the trust of investors," by which is not
>> >>> meant the IMF, the Fed or any other tentacle of the Rothschild
>> >>> financial empire. Rather, he was referring to investors who produce
>> >>> something in Hungary for Hungarians and cause true economic growth.
>> >>> This is not the "paper prosperity" of plutocratic pirates, but the
>> >>> sort of production that actually employs people and improves their
>> >>> lives.
>> >>>
>> >>> With Hungary now free from the shackles of servitude to debt slavers,
>> >>> it is no wonder that the president of the Hungarian central bank,
>> >>> operated by the government for the public welfare and not private
>> >>> enrichment, has demanded that the IMF close its offices in that
>> >>> ancient European land. In addition, the state attorney general,
>> >>> echoing Iceland's efforts, has brought charges against the last three
>> >>> previous prime ministers because of the criminal amount of debt into
>> >>> which they plunged the nation.
>> >>>
>> >>> The only step remaining, which would completely destroy the power of
>> >>> the banksters in Hungary, is for that country to implement a barter
>> >>> system for foreign exchange, as existed in Germany under the National
>> >>> Socialists and exists today in the Brazil, Russia, India, China and
>> >>> South Africa, or BRICS, international economic coalition. And if the
>> >>> United States would follow the lead of Hungary, Americans could be
>> >>> freed from the usurers' tyranny and likewise hope for a return to
>> >>> peaceful prosperity.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Ronald L. Ray is a freelance author residing in the free state of
>> >>> Kansas. He is a descendant of several patriots of the American War
>> >>> for
>> >>> Independence.
>> >>>
>> >>> Posted by Contributing Advocate at 17:56
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Bell, Stewart (National Post)"<sbell@nationalpost.com>
>> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:09:50 -0500
>> Subject: Re: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by two Jewish
>> groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or the Attorney
>> General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Unsubscribe
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "SCHABAS, PAUL"<PAUL.SCHABAS@blakes.com>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:53:29 -0400
>> Subject: RE: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by two Jewish
>> groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or the Attorney
>> General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Please remove me from your list.
>>
>> Paul Schabas
>> paul.schabas@blakes.com
>> 416.863.4274
>> 416.648.3396 (mobile)
>>
>>
>> Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
>> 199 Bay Street, Suite 4000, Toronto ON M5L 1A9
>> Tel: 416-863-2400 Fax: 416-863-2653
>> http://www.blakes.com | http://twitter.com/BlakesLaw
>>
>> Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP | Barristers & Solicitors | Patent &
>> Trade-mark Agents
>> This email communication is CONFIDENTIAL AND LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone
>> number shown above or by return email and delete this communication
>> and any copy immediately. Thank you.
>>
>> L'information paraissant dans ce message électronique est
>> CONFIDENTIELLE. Si ce message vous est parvenu par erreur, veuillez
>> immédiatement m’en aviser par téléphone ou par courriel et en détruire
>> toute copie. Merci.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "FISCHER, IRIS"<IRIS.FISCHER@blakes.com>
>> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2012 14:01:35 -0400
>> Subject: Out of Office: The RCMP, CYBERTIP, UNICF, Beyond Borders care
>> about children??? Yea Right tell me another one EH Brian Murphy?
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for your message. I am currently on maternity leave. For
>> assistance, please contact my assistant Denelle Mohammed at
>> 416.863.2569 or denelle.mohammed@blakes.com, or my colleagues Ryder
>> Gilliland (ryder.gilliland@blakes.com) or Adam Lazier
>> (adam.lazier@blakes.com).
>>
>>
>>
>> Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP | Toronto
>> Tel: 416-863-2400 Fax: 416-863-2653
>> http://www.blakes.com/ | http://twitter.com/BlakesLaw/
>>
>> Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP | Barristers & Solicitors | Patent &
>> Trade-mark Agents
>> This email communication is CONFIDENTIAL AND LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify me at the telephone
>> number shown above or by return email and delete this communication
>> and any copy immediately. Thank you.
>>
>> L'information paraissant dans ce message électronique est
>> CONFIDENTIELLE. Si ce message vous est parvenu par erreur, veuillez
>> immédiatement m’en aviser par téléphone ou par courriel et en détruire
>> toute copie. Merci.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 7:32 PM
>> To: Robert D. Holmes
>> Cc: Ivan Whitehall; Lauren Gazzola; johnhugheslawoffice@nb.aibn.com;
>> gleblanc; cleblond@smss.com; Maria LaHood; Marissam;
>> ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca; radical; t.wilson; sdllaw@gmail.com; Aliya
>> Hana Hussain; pastorscott; Michael Ratner; Fred.Wyshak;
>> justin.trudeau.a1; marco.morency; marc; marc.garneau.a1;
>> gregory.craig; gregor.robertson; George.Soros; sbell;
>> Mark.Potok@splcenter.org; sfogel@cija.ca; pgladman@bnaibrith.ca;
>> ABromberg@bnaibrith.ca; rmarceau@cija.ca; pam.maceachern@nelligan.ca;
>> BROOKS, NANCY; SCHABAS, PAUL; echerniak@lerners.ca;
>> richard.cohen@splcenter.org; henry.brown@gowlings.com;
>> staleyr@bennettjones.ca; dodged; phoward; paul@paulfromm.com;
>> Morris.Dees@splcenter.org; Jeff Saikaley; michael.coren; Robert.
>> Jones; David Amos; bernadine.chapman; john.warr; roger.l.brown;
>> Ian.Shardlow; oldmaison; andre; danny.copp; Leanne.Fitch
>> Subject: Re: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by two Jewish
>> groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or the Attorney
>> General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>>
>> Ditto to you too Holmes Remember the documents I sent you in the
>> Conrad Blck VS Breedon  and the Boyz matter? Well MURDER IS A CAPITAL
>> CRIME CORRECT?
>>
>> On 8/22/13, Robert D. Holmes <rdholmes@mhklaw.com> wrote:
>> > Ditto -- Please remove me from all of this.
>> >
>> > HOLMES & KING
>> > per:
>> > Robert D. Holmes, Q.C.
>> > 1300 - 1111 West Georgia Street
>> > Vancouver BC Canada V6E 4M3
>> > Telephone 604-681-1310
>> > Fax 604-681-1307
>> > *******************
>> > The information contained in this transmission is privileged and/or
>> > confidential information intended for the use of the individual or
>> > entity named above.  If the reader of this message is not the intended
>> > recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>> > distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
>> >
>> > *******************
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Ivan Whitehall [mailto:IWhitehall@plaideurs.ca]
>> > Sent: August 22, 2013 4:00 PM
>> > To: Lauren Gazzola
>> > Cc: David Amos; johnhugheslawoffice@nb.aibn.com; gleblanc;
>> > cleblond@smss.com; Maria LaHood; Marissam; ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca;
>> > radical; t.wilson; sdllaw@gmail.com; Aliya Hana Hussain; pastorscott;
>> > Michael Ratner; Fred.Wyshak; justin.trudeau.a1; marco.morency; marc;
>> > marc.garneau.a1; gregory.craig; gregor.robertson; George.Soros; sbell;
>> > Mark.Potok@splcenter.org; sfogel@cija.ca; pgladman@bnaibrith.ca;
>> > ABromberg@bnaibrith.ca; rmarceau@cija.ca; pam.maceachern@nelligan.ca;
>> > Robert D. Holmes; Nancy.brooks@blakes.com; paul.schabas@blakes.com;
>> > echerniak@lerners.ca; richard.cohen@splcenter.org;
>> > henry.brown@gowlings.com; staleyr@bennettjones.ca; dodged; phoward;
>> > paul@paulfromm.com; Morris.Dees@splcenter.org; Jeff Saikaley;
>> > michael.coren; Robert. Jones; David Amos; bernadine.chapman;
>> > john.warr; roger.l.brown; Ian.Shardlow; oldmaison; andre; danny.copp;
>> > Leanne.Fitch
>> > Subject: Re: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by two Jewish
>> > groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or the Attorney
>> > General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> >
>> > Please remove me from the chain. Thank you.
>> >
>> > from the I Phone of
>> > I. G. Whitehall, QC, JD
>> >
>> >
>> > This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
>> > are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Thank
>> > you.
>> > Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou
>> > privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, veuillez
>> > nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci.
>> >
>> > On 2013-08-22, at 17:25, "Lauren Gazzola"<LGazzola@ccrjustice.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Ditto - please remove me immediately
>> >
>> > Lauren Gazzola | Communications Associate - Publications Center for
>> > Constitutional Rights
>> > 666 Broadway, 7th Floor
>> > New York, NY 10012
>> > p 212-614-6480 | e LGazzola@ccrjustice.orgwww.ccrjustice.org Follow
>> > @theCCR on Twitter and "Center for Constitutional Rights" on Facebook
>> >
>> > "Animals matter.  Animals matter because they not only live, but have
>> > lives-lives that we have every reason to believe are filled with joy
>> > and pain." - Jonathan Safran Foer
>> >
>> > It's not food. It's violence.
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 5:21 PM
>> > To: johnhugheslawoffice@nb.aibn.com; gleblanc; cleblond@smss.com;
>> > Maria LaHood; Marissam; ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca; radical; t.wilson;
>> > sdllaw@gmail.com; Aliya Hana Hussain; Lauren Gazzola; pastorscott;
>> > Michael Ratner; Fred.Wyshak; justin.trudeau.a1; marco.morency; marc;
>> > marc.garneau.a1; gregory.craig; gregor.robertson; George.Soros; sbell;
>> > Mark.Potok@splcenter.org; sfogel@cija.ca; iwhitehall@plaideurs.ca;
>> > pgladman@bnaibrith.ca; ABromberg@bnaibrith.ca; rmarceau@cija.ca;
>> > pam.maceachern@nelligan.ca; rdholmes@mhklaw.com;
>> > Nancy.brooks@blakes.com; paul.schabas@blakes.com;
>> > echerniak@lerners.ca; richard.cohen@splcenter.org;
>> > henry.brown@gowlings.com; staleyr@bennettjones.ca; dodged; phoward;
>> > paul@paulfromm.com; Morris.Dees@splcenter.org; jsaikaley@plaideurs.ca;
>> > michael.coren
>> > Cc: Robert. Jones; David Amos; bernadine.chapman; john.warr;
>> > roger.l.brown; Ian.Shardlow; oldmaison; andre; danny.copp;
>> > Leanne.Fitch
>> > Subject: Re: A Neo-Nazi estate dispute being overseen by two Jewish
>> > groups Perhaps Shimon Fogel should talk to his lawyer or the Attorney
>> > General Blais or his Number # fan Mr Baconfat???
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Shimon Fogel <sfogel@cija.ca>
>> > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:20:39 -0500
>> > Subject: Re: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be overseen by
>> > two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
>> > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I have no idea who you are or why you have decided to add me to your
>> > list of individuals receiving you messages. Please remove my name from
>> > your list-serve.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > SKF
>> >
>> > Shimon Koffler Fogel
>> > Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs
>> > 613.234.8271  ext.240
>> >
>> > The Centre has a new look online. Visit cija.ca and let us know what
>> > you think!
>> >
>> > WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS ZIONIST'S MANY EVIL WORDS MR FOGEL???
>> >
>> > http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
>> >
>> > Monday, May 27, 2013
>> > Zionism,The David Amos Rant, and the Pederast!
>> > David Amos is a garden variety coward and anti-Semite. He hates
>> > Zionists. He proudly trumpets his hatred, vitriol, venom, and insane
>> > animus against Jews and Zionists. He proclaims his insane ideas that
>> > "Jewish bankers are trying to blow up the world's economy," on
>> "conspiracy theory computer web sites."
>> >
>> > Yes David Amos, I am a Zionist! I served in IDF as an exchange
>> > officer. I am in good company. Arik Sharon was a Zionist. Theodor
>> > Hertzl
>> was a Zionist.
>> > David Ben Gurion was a Zionist. British Foreign Secretary Harold
>> > Balfour was a Zionist. Sir Winston Churchill was a Zionist. Canadian
>> > Prime Minister Lester Pearson was a Zionist. United States President
>> > Harry Truman, was a Zionist.
>> >
>> > Diaspora Jews may, or may not be Zionists, but true Jews are Zionists.
>> >
>> > Ilikenewman, or young Owen from the UK, had David Amos pegged as a
>> > little man, a bigot, and called him out as the anti-Semite he is. He
>> > was
>> "outted"
>> > on You Tube as an insane little man, for the entire planet to see, and
>> > disdain. David then tried to call young Owen's school in the UK. Just
>> > like he called the Dean of my daughter's law school.
>> >
>> > Those people of Fredericton who see David Amos in their community now
>> > see him as the evil, pederast, anti-Semite hater, that he really is.
>> > The people of New Brunswick when the see his children or his daughter
>> > Laura, will see the racist pigs that David Amos raised them to be.
>> >
>> > Zionists risk their lives for a greater good. Zionists fight and die
>> > for a home for the world's Jewry, a bolt hole if you will, from evil
>> > anti-Semites of the planet like David Amos.
>> >
>> > Yes David I am a Zionist! You are a pedophile and your children racist
>> > animals like yourself. David who claim a past with Alberta, but the
>> > reality is that you couldn't find Alberta on a map of Canada, on the
>> > best day you ever had.
>> >
>> > David, my lad, how is that for some "criminal malice?"
>> >
>> > Posted by Seren at 8:50 PM
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: "Murray, Leanne"<leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:28:56 -0300
>> > Subject: Out of Office: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be
>> > overseen by two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
>> > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I will be out of the office on vacation from August 5 to 21, 2013,
>> > inclusive, and will have limited access to email during this time
>> > period.
>> >
>> > For immediate assistance from August 5 to 9, 2013, please contact Lynn
>> > Davidson at 453-0929 or by email at lynn.davidson@mcinnescooper.com.
>> > For immediate assistance from August 12 to 21, 2013, please contact
>> > Margie Loisel at 458-1034 or by email at
>> > margie.loisel@mcinnescooper.com; otherwise, I will get back to you as
>> soon as possible upon my return.
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:28:42 -0300
>> > Subject: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be overseen by two
>> > Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
>> > To: cdmacausland@stewartmckelvey.com, "Marc.Leger"
>> > <Marc.Leger@gnb.ca>, "Marc.Litt"<Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com>,
>> > "marc.chiasson"<marc.chiasson@mcinnescooper.com>, "marco.morency"
>> > <marco.morency@petitcodiac.org>, abromberg <abromberg@bnaibrith.ca>,
>> > rmarceau <rmarceau@cija.ca>
>> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, oldmaison
>> > <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, woodsideb
>> > <woodsideb@fredericton.ca>, "Leanne.Fitch"
>> > <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "leanne.murray"
>> > <leanne.murray@mcinnescooper.com>
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:21:07 -0300
>> > Subject: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be overseen by two
>> > Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
>> > To: tlsoontiens@stewartmckelvey.com, bdysart
>> > <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>, bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>, nrubin
>> > <nrubin@stewartmckelvey.com>
>> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "marie-claude.blais"
>> > <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "richard.cohen"
>> > <richard.cohen@splcenter.org>, "Richard.Williams"
>> > <Richard.Williams@gnb.ca>
>> >
>> > http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/case-dossier/info/sum-som-eng.aspx?cas=31693
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Britt Dysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>
>> > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:21:17 +0000
>> > Subject: Automatic reply: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be
>> > overseen by two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
>> > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I am out of the office in meetings much of today, and will not have
>> > regular access to my email or voicemail during this time. Please
>> > contact my assistant,Sonja at 506-443-9942 and she will direct your
>> > inquiry. Otherwise, I will contact you upon my return .
>> >
>> >
>> >       ***********************************
>> > This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is confidential
>> > and may be privileged. Any unauthorized distribution or disclosure is
>> prohibited.
>> > Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient does not
>> > constitute waiver of privilege.  If you have received this e-mail in
>> > error, please notify us and delete it and any attachments from your
>> > computer system and records.
>> >       -----------------------------------
>> > Ce courriel (y compris  les pièces jointes) est confidentiel et peut
>> > être privilégié.  La distribution ou la divulgation non autorisée de
>> > ce courriel est interdite.  Sa divulgation à toute personne autre que
>> > son destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de privilège.  Si
>> > vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez nous aviser et
>> > éliminer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre système
>> informatique et de vos dossiers.
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Teri Soontiens <tlsoontiens@stewartmckelvey.com>
>> > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:21:23 +0000
>> > Subject: Automatic reply: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be
>> > overseen by two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
>> > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I will be out of the office the afternoon of Wednesday, August 21,
>> > 2013.  If your matter is urgent, please contact Chantal MacAusland at
>> > cdmacausland@stewartmckelvey.com.
>> >
>> >
>> >       ***********************************
>> > This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is confidential
>> > and may be privileged. Any unauthorized distribution or disclosure is
>> prohibited.
>> > Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient does not
>> > constitute waiver of privilege.  If you have received this e-mail in
>> > error, please notify us and delete it and any attachments from your
>> > computer system and records.
>> >       -----------------------------------
>> > Ce courriel (y compris  les pièces jointes) est confidentiel et peut
>> > être privilégié.  La distribution ou la divulgation non autorisée de
>> > ce courriel est interdite.  Sa divulgation à toute personne autre que
>> > son destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de privilège.  Si
>> > vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez nous aviser et
>> > éliminer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre système
>> informatique et de vos dossiers.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > From: Charles LeBlond <cleblond@stewartmckelvey.com>
>> > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:10:39 +0000
>> > Subject: Automatic reply: CBC says A Neo-Nazi estate dispute will be
>> > overseen by two Jewish groups and a very corrupt Attorney General???
>> > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > I will be out of the office until Monday, August 26, 2013.  I will
>> > have limted acess to emails.  For immediate assistance, please contact
>> > my assistant Teri at tlsoontiens@stewartmckelvey.com.
>> > Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 26 août, 2013.  J'aurai un accès
>> > limité à mes courriels.  Pour une aide immédiate, communiquez avec mon
>> > assistante Teri à tlsoontiens@stewartmckelvey.com.
>> > .
>> >
>> >
>> >       ***********************************
>> > This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is confidential
>> > and may be privileged. Any unauthorized distribution or disclosure is
>> prohibited.
>> > Disclosure to anyone other than the intended recipient does not
>> > constitute waiver of privilege.  If you have received this e-mail in
>> > error, please notify us and delete it and any attachments from your
>> > computer system and records.
>> >       -----------------------------------
>> > Ce courriel (y compris  les pièces jointes) est confidentiel et peut
>> > être privilégié.  La distribution ou la divulgation non autorisée de
>> > ce courriel est interdite.  Sa divulgation à toute personne autre que
>> > son destinataire ne constitue pas une renonciation de privilège.  Si
>> > vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez nous aviser et
>> > éliminer ce courriel, ainsi que les pièces jointes, de votre système
>> informatique et de vos dossiers.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <mailer-daemon@googlemail.com>
>> > Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:10:30 +0000
>> > Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>> > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> >
>> > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>> >
>> >     johnhugheslawoffice@nb.aibn.com
>> >
>> > Technical details of permanent failure:
>> > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the
>> > server for the recipient domain nb.aibn.com by mx.bellaliant.com.
>> > [4.59.182.109].
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 8/21/13, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Well who gets to oversee the malicious actions of the Attorney
>> >> General?
>> >>
>> >> Methinks it must be mean old me. Its a dirty job but soembody has to
>> >> do it. What say you? Please check the pdf file hereto attached and
>> >> argue me in writing if ya dare.
>> >>
>> >> The Chaisson lawyer is a partner in McInnes and Cooper thus he and
>> >> his partners have had Hard Copy of some of my concerns about illegal
>> >> probate actions practiced against the courts by lawyers for many
>> >> years. According to the CROWN Corp known as the CBC(They would not
>> >> conceal awful truths would they?) Chaisson dismissed Hughes'
>> >> suggestion that the Southern Poverty Law Centre is pulling strings as
>> >> "a conspiracy theory.""Where is the evidence? You can't just come to
>> >> court and throw wild accusations like that without any shred of
>> >> evidence," said Chiasson.
>> >>
>> >> Well trust that I have LOTS of evidence of conspiriacies practiced by
>> >> the Southern Poverty Law Center and legions of others that Chaisson
>> >> and his fellow lawyers should have disclosed to John Hughes by now.
>> >> Perhaps John Hughes should ignore his golfing buddies and finally
>> >> call me back. He and I should bury the hachet and he should simply
>> >> quit bullshitting me and ask me nicely for an affidavit and invite me
>> >> to court on September 10th. The amount being argued within the
>> >> McCorkell estate is chump change to me. However the Free Speech
>> >> issues and the right to privacy without state intervening on behalf
>> >> of unethicial "civil rights" groups certainly is not.
>> >>
>> >> The awful truth is the Attorney General is an elected public official.
>> >> The Blais lawyer from Moncton  was appointed by her mindless party
>> >> leader David Alward to uphold the law not to break it for the benefit
>> >> of greedy Yankees. The self appointed Jewish Groups who claim to be
>> >> the gusrfians of our civil rights are no such thing that task belongs
>> >> to our Justice officials. The Jewish groups should have had no
>> >> standing in the mcCorkell matter whatsoever.Hell even Canadian Jewish
>> >> lawyers such as Ezzy Baby Levant and Karen Selick agreed with me very
>> >> publicly. To watch a corrupt Attorney General and her mindless
>> >> minions side with a couple of sneaky Yankee lawyers was truly comical
>> >> indeed but to see the Court of the Queen's Bench allow the nonsense
>> >> of it all was way beyond ridiculous.
>> >>
>> >> How will the ordinary folk of New Brunswick have any idea what joke
>> >> the province may become over this frivolous action if the CBC and
>> >> their media buddies do not duly inform them of all sides of the
>> >> matter instead of merely slandering people. How many taxpayers
>> >> dollars have been spent already on secretive ex RCMP private
>> >> investigators and the less that useles litigation team? It had not
>> >> escaped my notice that many bloggers etc are not so easily fooled by
>> >> the Corporate Media. Try Googling mccorkell new brunswick sometime to
>> >> see how much of a joke Maritimers have already become no thanks to
>> >> Attorney General Blais and her minions.
>> >>
>> >> Moncton's former city solicitor John Hughes should not have ignored
>> >> me years ago so I am not surprised that he ignored once again
>> >> recently.
>> >>
>> >> The amount of money he wants to argue before the Supreme Court is the
>> >> smallest that I have ever seen.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/case-dossier/info/sum-som-eng.aspx?cas=31693
>> >>
>> >> Trust that the pdf file hereto attached proves that I could make
>> >> Hughes a very wealthy man if he were even remotely ethical and his
>> >> friend Attorney General Blais and her boss Stephen Harper know it.
>> >>
>> >> Its just like I hinted in an email to the Yankee lawyer/preacher
>> >> Scotty Baby Lively who is also battling the same SPLC dudes that I
>> >> published early this morning before I heard the news today. In my
>> >> humble opinion Mr Streed should use his rights in the US of A and sue
>> >> everyone of the nastyCanadian bastards ASAP in a US District Court
>> >> pursuant to US Title 42 Section 1982. If they wish to attack him he
>> >> should at least get to pick the turf.
>> >>
>> >> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/08/the-snobby-lawyerpreacher
>> >> -
>> >> scotty-lively.html
>> >>
>> >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/story/2013/07/31/nb-neo-n
>> >> a
>> >> zi-mccorkell-estate.html
>> >>
>> >> Hughes contends the Southern Poverty Law Centre is behind the whole
>> >> matter and recruited her.
>> >>
>> >> This is "a skillful operation by people who have done this many
>> >> times, not only to bankrupt their opponents, but to enrich their own
>> >> organization," he said.
>> >>
>> >> But her lawyer dismissed Hughes's suggestion that the Southern
>> >> Poverty Law Centre is pulling strings as "a conspiracy theory."
>> >>
>> >> "Where is the evidence? You can't just come to court and throw wild
>> >> accusations like that without any shred of evidence," said Chiasson.
>> >>
>> >> How his client pays her legal bills is a matter of client-attorney
>> >> privilege, he said.
>> >>
>> >> Judge ruled against cross-examination Justice Peter Glennie ruled
>> >> against allowing the cross-examination.
>> >>
>> >> "Cross examination under these circumstances should not become an
>> >> application for discovery," he said.
>> >>
>> >> The judge also ruled the temporary injunction should continue until
>> >> the hearing on Sept. 10.
>> >>
>> >> "I can't see any good coming out of this," said Chiasson, referring
>> >> to the estate going to the National Alliance. "Only evil would come
>> >> from that."
>> >>
>> >> Just in case folks think I don't understand the scene laid out above
>> >> pehaps they should checkout a letter an evil Special Agent of the US
>> >> Treasury Dept wrote me long ago.
>> >>
>> >> http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ne8Q7TeybUc/SFNyAJCln9I/AAAAAAAABE8/seWnLXU
>> >> 8
>> >> YMU/s1600-h/IRS.jpg
>> >>
>> >> Or find some fun in reading illegal ex parte documents filed by the
>> >> US Attorney in Beantown in order to try to protect his beloved
>> >> Cardinal Bernard Francis Law's evil arse.
>> >> They begin around page 100 of this file.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>> >>
>> >> (Wanna see more? Trust that I have lots more All ya gotta do is surf
>> >> the
>> >> web)
>> >>
>> >> How about how I used US Title 42 to defend my dumb arse agains the
>> >> Janet Reno's pal the VERY VERY EVIL Yankee lesbian Judge Sidney
>> >> Hanlon in 2004? Everything Hanlon did against me was ex parte and
>> >> VERY ILLEGAL.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1982
>> >>
>> >> 42 USC § 1982 - Property rights of citizens
>> >>
>> >> US CodeNotesUpdatesAuthorities (CFR)Current through Pub. L. 113-21.
>> >> (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)
>> >>
>> >> All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in every
>> >> State and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof to
>> >> inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and personal
>> >> property.
>> >>
>> >> Source
>> >>
>> >> (R.S. § 1978.)
>> >> Codification
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> R.S. § 1978 derived from act Apr. 9, 1866, ch. 31, § 1,14 Stat. 27.
>> >> Section was formerly classified to section 42 of Title 8, Aliens and
>> >> Nationality.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/02/november-05-2004-legal-ta
>> >> l
>> >> k-text-of.html
>> >>
>> >> THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
>> >> THE TRIAL COURT
>> >> DORCHESTER, SS.
>> >> DISTRICT COURT DEPARTMENT
>> >> THE COMMONWEALTH OF )
>> >> MASSACHUSETTS )
>> >> CRIMINAL ACTION
>> >> )
>> >> DOCKET NO. 0407CR004623
>> >> v . )
>> >> )
>> >> DAVID R. AMOS )
>> >> )
>> >> AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. AMOS
>> >> Now comes, David R. Amos, a Citizen of Canada and a Legal Permanent
>> >> Resident of the USA and asserts his Constitutional Rights pursuant to
>> >> Title 42 Sections 1981, 1982, 1985 and 1986 of the Federal Code and
>> >> freely swears under the penalties of perjury that the following
>> >> statements are true and to the best of his knowledge.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Attorney+General+Janet+Reno+Opens+New+D
>> >> o
>> >> rchester+Domestic+Violence...-a065078979
>> >>
>> >> United States Attorney General Janet Reno came to Boston today to
>> >> announce the opening of the new Dorchester District Court Domestic
>> >> Violence Session, under a Department of Justice grant given to Boston.
>> >> The Judicial Oversight Demonstration Initiative (JOD) grant is for $7
>> >> million over five years, contingent on continued Congressional
>> >> appropriations.
>> >>
>> >> Judge Sydney Hanlon, presiding judge of the Dorchester District
>> >> Court, will run the new domestic violence session. The domestic
>> >> violence court session will conduct arraignments, bail hearings,
>> >> probation surrenders, and probation reviews. It will also hear all ex
>> >> parte and contested civil restraining orders.
>> >>
>> >> http://www.mass.gov/courts/appealscourt/justices/hanlon.html
>> >>
>> >> http://wikiworldbook.com/global-address-book/Sidney-Hanlon
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> BTW lots of people hate lots of other people it is not illegal in
>> >> most places that are blessed with common sense. However with the
>> >> right to Free Speech come responsibility. Freedom has its limits in a
>> >> purportedly "Just" Society. Free Speech does not give one the licence
>> >> to injure others with your mouth or pen.
>> >>
>> >> R. v. Lucas, [1998] 1 S.C.R. 439 is the leading Supreme Court of
>> >> Canada decision on defamatory libel. The Court held that the freedom
>> >> of expression under Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights
>> >> and Freedoms is subject to the "reasonable limits prescribed by law"
>> >> set out in Section 1 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hell some offences come with quite a price tag in the British
>> >> Commonwealth. For instance libel and hate speech are illegal under
>> >> the Canadian Criminal Code Check Sections 300 and 319 if you don't
>> >> believe mean old me.
>> >>
>> >> http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-46/page-150.html#docCont
>> >>
>> >> http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/page-155.html#h-92
>> >>
>> >> For instance the Jewish lawyer Ezzy Baby Levant can have fun
>> >> preaching hate on Corporate TV against fools as Arty Topham and
>> >> legions of mindless anarchists but just like all of you Ezzy dares
>> >> not to even breathe my name over the public airwaves if he wishes to
>> keep his job.
>> >> This is a comical video.
>> >>
>> >> http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2012/11/muslim-hate-
>> >> ...

[Message clipped]  View entire message

Donald Trump declared that he has the "absolute right" to pardon himsel

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/donald-trump-pardon-himself-giuliani-russia-probe-mueller-1.4690400

Trump claims 'absolute right' to pardon himself

Remark comes a day after president's top lawyer called self-pardon 'unthinkable'



2112 Comments


Wil Brown 
Wil Brown
On the bright side, 46 will have to be an improvement. I don't think the Americans can set the bar any lower.


David Amos
David Amos
@Wil Brown Methinks Canadian folks need to see it for what it is. Trump is not our leader Why not just sit back and enjoy the circus south of the 49th because there is nothing you can do about it anyway N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@Inas Johnson "This article is just more B.S. to keep all distracted and worked up over things that don't exist."

YUP


Dave Robertson 
Jamie Robins
An innocent person does not talk about pardoning themselves.


David Amos
David Amos
@Jamie Robins Methinks that is when he should say "pardon me" N'esy Pas?



Inas Johnson
Inas Johnson
@Jamie Robins

Still waiting for more than a nothing burger.

David Amos
David Amos
@Inas Johnson Me Too


Jamie Robins 
Gorden Feist
Years ago someone who was above the law was considered a dictator. Now the alt-right consider him a hero. Sad!


David Amos
David Amos
@Jim Palmer Methinks you fail to see the humour in this nonsense N'esy Pas?


Jamie Robins 
Anna Lyle
Good grief! This is further evidence of the mental health issues Trump obviously suffers from.


David Amos
David Amos
@Anna Lyle Methinks narcissism is not a mental health issue but believing in the words lawyers certainly should be N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@Inas Johnson "Stop and think. Try to read up and check all the other sides of the story"

Methinks you should do the same N'esy Pas? Instead of burying my comments why not Google the following?

Trump NAFTA FATCA Cohen David Amos


Ken Simpson 
Ken Simpson
Kim Jong-un and Trump should get alone great they are both crazy.


Jim Palmer
Jim Palmer
@Ken Simpson

Not just 'plain' crazy, but Bat$#!+ crazy !!!

David Amos
David Amos
@Jim Palmer Methinks you are letting the Yankee circus upset you too much N'esy Pas?


Jamie Robins 
Jamie Robins
Trump is actually making Bush look good!!



Lou Parks
Lou Parks
@Jamie Robins

Everyone supporting that comment of yours
*clearly* has no clue about G.W. Bush.
Trump hasn't caused *1/10th* of the harm that G.W. Bush has caused.



David Amos
David Amos
@Lou Parks True



Inas Johnson
Inas Johnson
@Jamie Robins

No. Your perception of reality vs fantasy is cracking.

David Amos
David Amos
@Inas Johnson Methinks you may enjoy my perception of reality after you read the comment section found in the link below published one year before Trump was elected N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276


Randy Ellis 
Randy Ellis
No way Putin could have foreseen the wild success he's had in his bid to get a reality TV celebrity with zero political experience elected as President of the United States. Not even through the second year and already the guy is talking about pardoning himself, the country is a laughing stock and on the brink of a Constitutional Crisis.

Well played Vladimir, well played indeed.




Alexander Borgia
Alexander Borgi
@Randy Ellis Sure, blame thew Russians, why not. America could never admit that they did this to themselves.

David Amos
David Amos
@Alexander Borgia Oh So True


Gorden Feist 
Gorden Feist
The very rich and the very poor voted for Trump. One group lacks education and the other lacks a moral compass.


David Amos
David Amos
@Gorden Feist Methinks the rich and the poor amongst the Yankee "peoplekind" had no other choice because "The Donald" was the lesser of two evils offered on their ballots N'esy Pas?


Syd Barret 
Syd Barret
Trump is doing his absolute best to look like a tin pot despot.


Theo Crane
Theo Crane
@Syd Barret
At least he’s not hiding that he’s a tin pot despot at heart.

Kevin Graves (AKA Jaspersdad)
Kevin Graves (AKA Jaspersdad)
@Theo Crane

"He tells it like it is."

David Amos
David Amos
@Theo Crane Well put


Jed Took 
Jed Took
the U.S. has become the laughing stock of the world...what a joke


David Amos
David Amos
@Jed Took Methinks everybody loves a circus N'esy Pas?



Trump claims 'absolute right' to pardon himself

Remark comes a day after president's top lawyer called self-pardon 'unthinkable'


U.S. President Donald Trump arrives for a bill signing ceremony at the White House on May 30. Trump says he has the 'absolute right to PARDON myself,' but that he has 'done nothing wrong' in the Russia probe. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)


U.S. President Donald Trump declared Monday that he has the "absolute right" to pardon himself, but added he had done nothing wrong, asserting his presidential power as the White House sharpens its political and legal defences against the special counsel's Russia probe.

Trump's comments on Twitter came a day after attorney Rudy Giuliani played down the possibility that the president could pardon himself, suggesting he might have that authority but would be unwise to use it.

"Pardoning himself would be unthinkable and probably lead to immediate impeachment," Giuliani, a member of Trump's legal team, told NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. "And he has no need to do it, he's done nothing wrong."

In Monday's tweet, the president said:

Trump's legal team is making clear that it will combat any effort to force the president to testify in front of a grand jury. Giuliani on Sunday underscored one of the main arguments in a newly unveiled letter sent by Trump's lawyers to Mueller back in January — that a president can't be given a grand jury subpoena as part of the investigation into foreign meddling in the 2016 election.

But Giuliani, in a series of television interviews, broke with one of their bolder arguments in the letter that a president could not have committed obstruction of justice because he has ultimate authority over any federal investigation.

Yet the former New York City mayor, who was not on the legal team when the Jan. 29 letter was written, added that Trump "probably does" have the power to pardon himself, an assertion challenged by legal scholars. He says the president's legal team hasn't discussed that option, which many observers believe could plunge the nation into a constitutional crisis.
We don't live in a monarchy and you are not a king.—  Democratic Rep. Ted Deutch
"I think the political ramifications would be tough," Giuliani told ABC's This Week. "Pardoning other people is one thing, pardoning yourself is tough."

Trump has issued two unrelated pardons in recent days and discussed others, a move that has been interpreted as a possible signal to allies ensnared in the Russia probe.

White House spokesperson Sarah Huckabee Sanders partly echoed Trump and Giuliani on Monday when she told reporters the president wouldn't need a pardon because he "hasn't done anything wrong."

"Certainly no one is above the law," Sanders said.

But she also defended Trump's assertion that the special counsel investigation is unconstitutional, even though it is overseen by his administration's Justice Department.
No man is a judge in his own case.— Andrew Wright, Savannah Law School
Mueller has requested an interview with the president to determine whether he had criminal intent to obstruct the investigation into his associates' possible links to Russia's election interference.

Giuliani said Sunday that a decision about an interview would not be made until after Trump's summit with North Korean leader Kim Jong-un on June 12 in Singapore, and he cast doubt that it would occur at all.

In addition to the legal battles, Trump's team and allies have waged a public relations campaign against Mueller and the Justice Department to discredit the investigation and soften the impact of the special counsel's potential findings.


Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani arrives at the White House in Washington on May 30. Guiliani said Sunday that Trump pardoning himself would 'probably lead to immediate impeachment.' (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)

Giuliani said last week that the special counsel probe may be an "entirely illegitimate investigation" and need to be curtailed because, in his estimation, it was based on inappropriately obtained information from an informant and Comey's memos.

In reality, the FBI began a counterintelligence investigation in July 2016 to determine if Trump campaign associates were co-ordinating with Russia to tip the election. The investigation was opened after the hacking of Democratic emails that intelligence officials later formally attributed to Russia.

Trump's team has requested a briefing about the informant, but Giuliani said Sunday that the president would not order the Justice Department to comply because it would negatively affect public opinion.

But he continued to cast doubt on the special counsel's eventual findings, suggesting that Trump has already offered explanations for the matters being investigated and that the special counsel was biased against the president.
"For every one of these things he did, we can write out five reasons why he did it," Giuliani said. "If four of them are completely innocent and one of them is your assumption that it's a guilty motive, which [Trump] would deny, you can't possibly prosecute him."

Trump's legal team has long pushed the special counsel to narrow the scope of its interview. Giuliani also suggested that Trump's lawyers had been incorrect when they denied that the president was involved with the letter that offered an explanation for Donald Trump Jr.'s 2016 Trump Tower meeting with Russians who offered damaging information on Democrat Hillary Clinton.

"This is the reason you don't let the president testify," Giuliani told ABC. "Our recollection keeps changing, or we're not even asked a question and somebody makes an assumption."
If Trump does not consent to an interview, Mueller will have to decide whether to go forward with a historic grand jury subpoena. His team raised the possibility in March of subpoenaing the president, but it is not clear if it is still under active consideration.

A court battle is likely if Trump's team argues that the president can't be forced to answer questions or be charged with obstruction of justice.

President Bill Clinton was charged with obstruction in 1998 by the House of Representatives as part of his impeachment trial. And one of the articles of impeachment prepared against president Richard Nixon in 1974 was for obstruction.


Special counsel Robert Mueller departs surrounded by police and security after briefing members of the U.S. Senate on his investigation on June 21, 2017. (Joshua Roberts/Reuters)
The U.S. Constitution is silent on the issue of whether the president's broad power to grant pardons extends to himself, and some lawyers say that supports Trump's position.

"If there are any limits on the power, it's got to be in the constitution," said Samuel Morison, a former lawyer with Justice Department office that handles pardons. "It's nowhere in the constitution."

But many legal experts disagree. Andrew Wright, a former associate counsel in the Obama White House, said allowing the president to pardon himself would be contrary to fundamental principles of the American legal system.

"One of the basic rules is that no man is a judge in his own case," said Wright, a professor at Savannah Law School.

Trump's tweet on Monday triggered swift political criticism.

"You can't pardon yourself," Democratic Rep. Ted Deutch said on Twitter. "Let me remind you of something, we don't live in a monarchy and you are not a king."

A Canadian official says bilateral NAFTA talks are happening already

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trump-nafta-canada-mexico-1.4692046


Trump wants separate, 1-on-1 NAFTA talks with Canada, Mexico, adviser says

A Canadian official says bilateral NAFTA talks are happening already



1507 Comments



Jack Hill 
Jack Hill
Conservatives love a level playing field, so long as it it tipped in their favour.

Trump is no different.




Aaron Morris
Aaron Morris
@Jack Hill

Me too. There's a reason cops carry guns too.

Why would you engage in a fair fight when you don't have to?

David Amos
David Amos
@Aaron Morris Oh My Methinks your question does not warrant and answer N'esy Pas?


Kevin Delaney 
Kevin Delaney
Trump is but a painful moment in time. Fair exchange re NAFTA is something all want. Trump seeks dominance, fairness has nothing to do with it. Better days are ahead. Trump too will pass.


David Amos
David Amos 
@Kevin Delaney "Better days are ahead. Trump too will pass."

Nope

Methinks they keep coming back For instance Burney has always been a greedy Yankee's best buddy and he is back with his two bit worth N'esy Pas?

"The president has in the past floated the idea of bilateral deals if NAFTA talks fail. Former ambassador to the U.S. Derek Burney said bilateral talks are both feasible and desirable. "I think that we should agree to explore, if for no other reason than to inject a constructive note into our trade dialogue with the U.S.," he said."

Steven Arsenault 
Al Park
To a president who "doesn't like to read", I have no doubt that he's got no clue what's involved in ANY deal. The man is a washed up reality tv star....that's it.



Steven Arsenault
Steven Arsenault
@Fletch Peterson

Trump has never been a Multi-Billionaire.

In fact he has lied repeatedly about his wealth. However number crunchers have noted he would have been richer if he just invested his inheritance instead of losing millions in bad deals.

Also the Apprentice saved him along with South Korean developers who wanted his name on their buildings..... Prior to that he was near broke...despite stiffing people wherever he could.

No one does fake news better than Trump....irony at its finest.

David Amos
David Amos
@Steven Arsenault "No one does fake news better than Trump....irony at its finest."

Methinks Obama and his cohorts were every bit as talented with the "Fake News" game everybody knows that not just Trump N'esy Pas?


Charles Brody
Charles Beale
Trumpire is all about divide and conquer, Canada is not.


Jack Hill
Jack Hill
@Charles Beale

No, Trudeau has done a pretty fine job of dividing Canada and pitting Canadian against Canadian.

David Amos
David Amos
@Jack Hill YUP


Margaret Bricknell
John Paul Jones
The USA now stands alone in the world. Canada should not be so eager to stand next to them.


David Amos
David Amos
@John Paul Jones "Canada should not be so eager to stand next to them."

I agree


Jon Holmes 
Jon Holmes
Every single one of Drumpf's Economic Advisors looks like they've just recently suffered a Stroke or has one foot in the grave. These clowns long for a return to the 60's.


David Amos
David Amos
@Jon Holmes "These clowns long for a return to the 60's."

Methinks folks should learn to love the circus they are paying for it anyway N'esy Pas?


Karen King 
Karen King
Trump does not know what he wants, he wants to look good at everyone else's expense. Wonder if he knows how many really disagree with everything about him!!


David Amos
David Amos
@Karen King Methinks he does not care to know the awful truth about himself N'esy Pas?


Dale Sullivan 
Dale Sullivan
Trump makes me sick.


David Amos
David Amos
@Dale Sullivan Methinks you are not alone N'esy Pas?


Cole Trickle 
Cole Trickle
When are we getting free trade between provinces?


David Amos
David Amos
@Cole Trickle Methinks thou doth jest too much N'esy Pas?


Al Millar 
Al Millar
It's sad that people still call him the president . I had much more respect for that office before the Trumps and his crew of misfits came to power . The WH will need a heck of a cleaning to remove the stink of Trump Republicans from it .


Reginald McAlister
Reginald McAlister
@Al Millar
People get the government they deserve. We're hardly much better with the incompetent Mr. Dressup and his gang of scandalous misfits at the helm...


David Amos
David Amos
@Reginald McAlister YUP


Trump wants separate, 1-on-1 NAFTA talks with Canada, Mexico, adviser says

A Canadian official says bilateral NAFTA talks are happening already


U.S. President Donald Trump wants to try a 'different approach' to NAFTA negotiations after trilateral talks with Canada and Mexico stalled. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)



Donald Trump's economic adviser said today the U.S. has asked Canada to hold one-on-one North American Free Trade Agreement negotiations as trilateral talks sputter.

Larry Kudlow, director of the U.S. president's National Economic Council, said Trump is now "very seriously contemplating a shift in NAFTA negotiations."

"His preference now, and he asked me to convey this, is to actually negotiate with Mexico and Canada separately," he told Fox News Tuesday.

Kudlow said he spoke yesterday with one of Canada's "top people, right next to the prime minister" about the president's "new thinking," and is now awaiting a response from Canada that could come as early as today. He did not name the official.

"I'm waiting to hear what their reaction is going to be, frankly," he said.

A senior Canadian official said the government is aware of Kudlow's comments and similar remarks made by the president in past.

Canada's position, the official said, is that the negotiations are for a trilateral agreement. Discussions between individual NAFTA partners already happen regularly — so in that sense one-on-one talks are already happening, the official added.

Andrew Leslie, the parliamentary secretary to the foreign affairs minister in charge of Canada-U.S. relations, said there has been speculation about separate negotiations for 18 months, but Canada remains focused on a trilateral agreement.

"As Canada has maintained right from the beginning, we believe in a trilateral NAFTA, we believe that together it's been a win-win-win for our three economies and all three nations have prospered," he said.
Kudlow said that a bilateral approach would be a way to address significant differences between the countries.

"Canada is a different country than Mexico, they have different problems and you know, (Trump has) believed that bilateral has always been better," Kudlow said.

"He hates large treaties. I know this is just three countries, but still, you know, oftentimes when you have to compromise with a whole bunch of countries you get the worst of the deals."

Kudlow said Trump is not going to withdraw from NAFTA, but wants to try a different approach. The president has in the past floated the idea of bilateral deals if NAFTA talks fail.

Former ambassador to the U.S. Derek Burney said bilateral talks are both feasible and desirable.
"I think that we should agree to explore, if for no other reason than to inject a constructive note into our trade dialogue with the U.S.," he said.
Depending on the outcome, any deal coming out of a series of bilateral talks could supplant or incorporate NAFTA, said Burney, who was chief of staff to former prime minister Brian Mulroney during the final negotiations of the Canada-U.S. free trade deal.

Mounting tensions


Kudlow's remarks came as tensions mount over the U.S. decision to end an exemption on steel and aluminum tariffs that initially had been granted for Canada, Mexico and the EU.

Canada countered by announcing it would slap an estimated $16.6 billion in duties on some steel and aluminum products and other goods from the U.S., including maple syrup, beer kegs, whisky and toilet paper.

White House chief economic adviser Larry Kudlow says Trump wants separate talks with Canada and Mexico. (Evan Vucci/Associated Press)
 
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland announced the plan last week, just hours after U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross confirmed the U.S. would impose tariffs of 25 per cent on imported steel and 10 per cent on imported aluminum, citing national security interests.

At a news conference announcing the new duties, set to kick in July 1, Trudeau said he abandoned a proposed meeting with Trump in Washington last week after the White House insisted that he first agree to a five-year "sunset clause" in a renegotiated NAFTA.

In a daily briefing today, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Trump's desire to hold one-on-one talks is not a sign that NAFTA is dead.

"It's not done, but the president is open to having individual deals," she said. "He's looking at the best way to make sure he gets the best deal possible for American workers and whether or not that's through NAFTA or other means, those options are on the table."

Methinks a lot of folks will be laughing when the Fat Lady sings about the LIEbranos in Ontario tomorrow night N'esy Pas?

$
0
0
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/green-party-mike-schreiner-election-guelph-win-in-reach-1.4694216


Green Leader Mike Schreiner 'cautiously optimistic' he'll win in Guelph

'Guelph is leading in so many areas that reflect the Green party's values,' Schreiner says

Liam Casey· The Canadian Press· Posted: Jun 06, 2018 1:12 PM ET

5 Comments


David Amos 
David Amos
Methinks if one bothers to notice the tally of comments in this article versus the one today about Ford its kinda obvious Ford will be the Premier and Schreiner will not win a seat Nesy Pas?

Mike Underhill 
Mike Underhill
I live in BC
Our Province is under the indirect control of 3 Greens/
Save your Province folks. DON'T vote Green


David Amos
David Amos
@Mike Underhill Methinks BC under the "indirect control" of just one lawyer who is the Green Party Leader camped in Ottawa N'esy Pas?



http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/grenier-ontario-election-polls-1.4693795


With a day to go, Ontario election is still Doug Ford's to lose

PCs began the campaign as favourites to win and remain so today, but much has changed



Éric Grenier· CBC News· Posted: Jun 06, 2018 11:43 AM ET


4195 Comments


 John Oaktree 
 "POOF"
John Oaktree
Doug Ford's promised nothing but huge whopping debt and chaos...

 
David Amos
Content disabled.After I got 4 likes
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks you will cry us a river all day N'esy Pas?


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks its rather strange that my reply to you would be blocked after I got four likes N'esy Pas?


mo bennett
Content disabled. 
mo bennett
@David Amos METHINKS YOU NEED TO STOP WITH THE MESSY PAWS!

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@mo bennett NOPE


Steven Arsenault
Steven Arsenault 
@mo bennett

Does anyone notice a difference in the posts....those that are anti-Ford are coming in with facts and figures and analysis and those who support Ford are coming in with anger and no facts with the exception of Scott Brown who is at least has a working theory (corporate taxes) though I respectfully disagree.

I would say to Scott on that front that past performance is not an indicator of future performance and Americans will come to regret the big tax giveaway to the rich......it is not something we should model. They have a debt to GDP ratio of 105%....ours is 89%......theirs is going to sky rocket from trumps moves.....ours will stay consistent (even if it should be lower).


David Amos
David Amos
@mo bennett Methinks you must know what they say about people who holler at ghosts N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Steven Arsenault "Does anyone notice a difference in the posts"

Methinks lots of folks have but they cannot read what CBC has blocked N'esy Pas?

David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree "Why do you want to stifle freedom of speech??"

Methinks you should ask CBC that question N'esy Pas?
  
 John Oaktree
 "POOF"
Ivan Nano
If you are fool enough to vote for this unqualified Ford, this time next year, we are allowed to a say 'we told you so'


 John Oaktree
 Content disabled.
 mo bennett
@Ivan Nano there's lots of fools out there that are allowed to vote. this should be stopped immediately

David Amos
David Amos
@Ivan Nano Methinks a lot f folks don't want Carbon Tax N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@mo bennett "there's lots of fools out there that are allowed to vote. this should be stopped immediately!"

Methinks that thou doth jest too much Everybody knows that your liberal friends need every vote N'esy Pas?


David Amos 
 "POOF"
Damien Johnston
Ontario will regret voting in ford!


Bill Nazarene
Bill Nazarene
@Damien Johnston

Jim Keegstra, Malcolm Ross, Monika Schaefer, Kevin J. Johnston, Alexandre Bissonnette and Gabriel Sohier Chaput would vote for Rob/Doug if they could.


Damien Johnston
Damien Johnston
@Bill Nazarene
Relevance?


Bill Nazarene
Bill Nazarene
@Damien Johnston

That cohort doesn't really care about anything other than an intolerant, hateful Alt-R agenda. So long as Rob/Doug panders to that, he can do no wrong in their eyes.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Damien Johnston Methinks he is the lessor of the three stooges wanting to continue putting the screws to the taxpayer for the benefit of we all know who N'esy Pas?


Neil Turv
Neil Turv
@Damien Johnston

The names he listed off were various people convicted of hate speech,
or other bigotry related offences.

Which to his credit is similar but different from his usual tactic of randomly selecting a point that doesn't agree with his and screaming "alt-right."

There's three types of people in Bill's eyes:
himself, those who agree with everything he says...and the alt-right


Bill Nazarene
Bill Nazarene
@Neil Turv

The words 'tolerance', 'inclusive', 'feminist', 'diversity' do get your back up, Jethro. We've all seen it.

You betray yourself...


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Damien Johnston Methinks some political people are gonna enjoy checking out my reply to you that CBC blocked N'esy Pas?


mo bennett
mo bennett
@Damien Johnston ontario will regret voting for any politician!

Neil Turv
Neil Turv
@Bill Nazarene

If you say so buddy, my posts are just as public as yours.


David Amos
David Amos
@Neil Turv "If you say so buddy, my posts are just as public as yours."

Methinks that many people wish that they could say the same as Mr Nazarene However only CBC and I know how many of my comments they blocked today unless Bill finally reads my blog N'esy Pas?


Neil Turv
Neil Turv
@David Amos

I'd love for Bill to call someone Alt-right and then finish with "Because you believe __________ based on this factual evidence." (And then he posts a link or quote).

Then I wouldn't have a leg to stand on, but considering the frequency and enthusiasm with which he applies that abhorrent term, I personally feel it's just a childish way to shut down conversation, mainly because I don't believe 40%-60% of Canadians would qualify as "Alt-R" and base don his accusations that's the range in his head.


Ivan Nano 
 "POOF"
 Ivan Nano
If you are ridiculous enough to vote in this completely unqualified Ford, I reserve the right a year from now to say 'I told you so'


David Amos
David Amos
@Ivan Nano Methinks you must have noticed that your other "most liked" thread and that of two others just went "POOF" N'esy Pas?


bill chagwich
 "POOF"
 James Watson
After her party is wiped out maybe Wynne can ask for refugee status in Ottawa or even Toronto if Horvath makes it a sanctuary city.


David Amos
David Amos
@James Watson Methinks the latest poll that CBC offers predicts that the liberals may win only one seat. Wouldn't it be a hoot if Wynne is the only one elected to sit in the house tomorrow. Now that would be a circus if she decided to quit N'esy Pas?

James Watson
James Watson
@David Amos

If she WERE the only sitting Liberal it would be fitting punishment .


 Bryan Atkinson
"POOF"
Bryan Atkinson
Rob was a more honest man than Doug and Rob was a disaster.

You should know by now, Ontario, you can't trust the Fords!


 John Oaktree
Robert Paul
@Jim Gurtle

That's a good way to put it.

I am voting for the party philosophy of more liberty legally and financially against the government.

The left wingers want to take away my money and my freedoms in order to benefit the "have nots" more than they deserve. Why anyone who is a "have" would vote to give it all away to bums I cannot fathom. It's a matter of degree - yes, help out people who cannot help themselves, which is a Conservative basic official value, but going too far like the Left is doing, is terribly unfair, and it's deception to suggest that the middle class should vote Left thinking that the Left will benefit them. It will not.

We need to attract money to the province so that we can all benefit from it in terms of jobs and services. High taxes discourage this. I am not saying to have no taxes, just that the Left is taking things way too far.

David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Robert Paul "I am voting for the party philosophy of more liberty legally and financially against the government."

Methinks many folks agree with you N'esy Pas?


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Robert Paul Methinks its rather strange to be blocked because I merely agreed with you N'esy Pas?


Steven Arsenault
Steven Arsenault
@David Amos

thanks for the reminder...I am going to mute you as that N'esy Pas? drives me nuts....I get that is your objective.


Patrick Smyth
Patrick Smyth
@Steven Arsenault

Muted a couple of weeks ago and it has been pure bliss since then.


Patrick Smyth
Patrick Smyth
@Rob Kov

There is plenty of evidence base arguments as well. You know, the ones you usually dismiss/ignore without addressing?

Rob Kov
Rob Kov
@Patrick Smyth like what? Be specific, don't just accuse people and then walk away without any substance to your argument, "You know, the ones you usually dismiss/ignore without addressing?"


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Rob Kov Methinks if you scroll up within this thread you will see two dudes who can't argue brag that they have had my comments blocked N'esy Pas?


David Amos
"POOF"
Tom Simpson
I realize most people are just voting to get rid of Wynne but to elect Ford as Premier? Ford? Good Luck Ontario... Sounds like you'll need it.


Daniel McKay
Daniel McKay
@Tom Simpson I dunno, I see a lot of people berating the federal leader/party that got in on the "get-rid-of-the-current-administration-at-any-cost" vote. I think some thought about who is being rallied behind, provincially, will serve the people of Ontario better. Better than "just anyone other than Wynne", at least.

If I am reading properly, Ontarians are voting for who can best fix Wynne's mess. There will be no forward movement based on political ideology or market preference. It's all about cleanup.

David Amos
David Amos
@Daniel McKay "If I am reading properly, Ontarians are voting for who can best fix Wynne's mess."

I agree


mo bennett
Content disabled.
mo bennett
@David Amos NONE OF 'EM CAN FIX WYNNE'S MESS, JUST THE SAME AS YOU COULDN'T!


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@mo bennett Who are you to judge me in capital letters? Methinks you have done nothing at all except make fun of people within CBC's comment sections N'esy Pas?

  
Jim Graham
Ed Toogood
I want services, not tax cuts.


David Amos
David Amos
@Ed Toogood "I want services, not tax cuts."

Methinks you jest or you drink way too much of the NDP's kool aid N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Patrick Smyth "Yup, those public sector employees aren't PEOPLE or anything, they are just things to be used as pawns by politicians seeking power or convenient scapegoats among the right for all of societies economic problems"

Methinks thou doth protest too much N'esy Pas ye who claims to mute me?


Richard Sharp
Richard Sharp
Me too. But we could do with way fewer police, fire fighters and prison staff. America's crazy wars on drugs, crime, illegal immigration, terror et al thoroughly infected us and it's time we healed ourselves.


David Amos
Content disabled.
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Methinks nobody would be surprised by your reply The real question is how long will it exist N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Richard Sharp Methinks it should be no surprise that my reply to you was blocked N'esy Pas?


John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@Ed Toogood

Doug Ford's promised nothing but huge whopping debt and chaos...

David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree Hours ago I told you to cry me a river and so you have. However instead of posting the same comments a bunch of times, why not read something for a change? Methinks if you have no idea who I am just Google the names Bill Morneau, Patrick Brown, Andrea Horwath and mine. You may become enlightened just before polling day N'esy Pas?



David Amos
David Amos
@Lester Rowe "Sounds like a carefully thought out untruth."

Methinks if you truly wish to hear such wicked things all you have to do is just ask me for the cell phone number of Trump's lawyer N'esy Pas?
  
Andrew McLaren
Andrew McLaren
Ford has nothing constructive to offer Ontario: all he is capable of is boilerplate reactionary rhetoric, and claims to represent "little guys" while supporting policies that amplify inequality. If it's his election to lose, the only mitigating factor in his favour, is advisors telling him to stick to vague and minimal details on any political matter.

Nice sock puppet. And corporate vultures can fill their boots.


David Amos
David Amos
@Jim Gurtle "Companies were leaving Ontario under Wynne and would pack their bags even faster if Horwath is premier"

YUP


David Amos
David Amos
@Andrew McLaren "Ford has nothing constructive to offer Ontario"

Methinks his promise to turf Carbon Tax is a very big deal N'esy Pas?

Andrew McLaren
Andrew McLaren
@David Amos
Youthinks abandoning a policy held by countries representing 95% of the Earth's population is a "very big deal" when it's more like holding a garage sale for bunker fuel distributors. Keep staring into the smog if you must.


David Amos
Content disabled.(After being disliked)
David Amos
@Andrew McLaren Methinks you do know who I am N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Andrew McLaren "Youthinks abandoning a policy held by countries representing 95% of the Earth's population is a "very big deal"

Methinks you are twisting my words for political reasons N'esy Pas?


Andrew McLaren
Andrew McLaren
@David Amos
I'll take your "N'esy Pas" as some cryptic affectation of the term "unnecessary". Ford's irrational plan to eliminate the carbon tax is politically twisted for many reasons, and "unnecessarily" places Ontario at a disadvantage when the rest of the planet is pricing carbon accordingly. There would be consequences, pay now or pay later.

David Amos
David Amos
@Andrew McLaren Methinks that you have no idea who I am However everybody "in the know" knows that if you were to Google the names Bill Morneau, Patrick Brown, Andrea Horwath and mine you may become enlightened just before polling day N'esy Pas?


John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@Andrew McLaren

Doug Ford's promised nothing but huge whopping debt and chaos...

David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks earlier when you had the most liked thread CBC blocked my replies to you for political reasons N'esy Pas?

John Oaktree 
Ivor Sargent
Ford would vote for Trump and vice versa.


Jim Graham
Jim Graham
@Ivor Sargent

Yes, Trump, Doug Ford, Joe Arpaio and Roy Moore ... the ideal Trump foursome for a short 9 holes.

David Amos
David Amos
@Jim Graham Methinks a couple of my political foes such as the lawyer Rob Moore and his new boss I call Harper 2.0 would vote for Ford and Trump if they could N'esy Pas?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276


David Amos
David Amos
@Bill Nazarene "and Jim Keegstra, Malcolm Ross, Monika Schaefer, Kevin J. Johnston, Alexandre Bissonnette and Gabriel Sohier Chaput would vote for Rob/Doug if they could."

Methinks you are being rather redundant N'esy Pas?

Robert Langdon
Andrew Hurrie
I am still in shock that Ontario would even consider Doug Ford as a viable candidate.
Seriously people...it is DOUG FORD!
What are you thinking??
Wake up Ontario!!!


David Amos
David Amos
@Robert Langdon "Unfortunately, what are the options? They're not much better."

Methinks most folks think they are worse N'esy Pas?


Arlond Lynds
Arlond Lynds
@Andrew Hurrie
The conservative party no longer exists in Canada, and the republican Party no longer deserves to exist south of the border.

David Amos
David Amos
@Arlond Lynds Methinks the "Progressive" Conservative Party was chucked under the bus by Petey Baby MacKay and his cohorts in 2003 but the far right "Conservative Party is here to stay for quite awhile even though MacKay and the last of his old PC his pals quit before the last election N'esy Pas?


Andrew McLaren
Mike McNair
Get out the Vote.


David Amos
Content disabled.(After being disliked many times)
David Amos
@Mike McNair Methinks that is exactly what the folks should do and vote for anyone they wish N'esy Pas?
  

John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@David Amos

I think you mean n'est-ce pas

N'esy pas is gibberish...


David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks we all know why I get 5 dislikes while your rather redundant insult gets 5 likes Yet when I reply to you I am usually blocked N'esy Pas?


Patrick Smyth
Patrick Smyth
@John Oaktree

"gibberish..."

David's speciality.


Roy T. Gilroy
Roy T. Gilroy
@John Oaktree Oh he means messy paw


David Amos
David Amos
@Patrick Smyth In another thread above you posted "Muted a couple of weeks ago and it has been pure bliss since then."

Methinks it ain't rocket science to figure out your specialty N'esy Pas?


David Amos
David Amos
@Roy T. Gilroy Methinks its rather obvious that you and Mr Bennett are the best of buddies N'esy Pas?


Andrew McLaren
Mike McNair
Ford will have his work cut out for him to start bringing businesses and investments back to Ontario.


David Amos
David Amos
@Mike McNair Methinks if he cuts taxes they will come N'esy Pas?


John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@David Amos

What's the gibberish at the end of your comment?? Does it mean something??

Perhaps you meant n'est-ce pas??


David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks I have explained it at least three times in the past month. If you left wingers can't recall perhaps you should confer with your friend "mo bennett"? Trust that he knows the score as he twists it to "messy paws" N'esy Pas?


John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@Mike McNair

From: Rob Kov

@John Oaktree lying to the public about politics on a national news station isn't a freedom of speech issue, its a journalistic integrity issue.

David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree YUP


Brian Stewart
Claire Blackstone
CBC headline the day before the election implies a possible loss for PCs - just to make sure we know the preference of the "national broadcaster."


David Amos
David Amos
@Claire Blackstone "CBC headline the day before the election implies a possible loss for PCs"

Methinks its time to sit back and watch the circus and laugh as we wait for the Fat Lady sing a wickedly righteous tune tomorrow night. However I must admit that for once I agree with Wynne in that the best outcome would be a minority mandate but its looks like a big win for Ford N'esy Pas?


John Oaktree
John Oaktree
@Claire Blackstone

From: Rob Kov

@John Oaktree lying to the public about politics on a national news station isn't a freedom of speech issue, its a journalistic integrity issue.

David Amos
David Amos
@John Oaktree Methinks you are being far to redundant in order to bury the words of other folks N'esy Pas?

bill chagwich 
bill chagwich
Ford has his work cut out, with the debt that Wynne has left, by the way Horwath wants to continue


David Amos
David Amos
@bill chagwich "Ford has his work cut out, with the debt that Wynne has left"

Methinks that is an understatement He is gonna have a lot of nightmares to deal with if he wins N'esy Pas?


Pierre Elliott 
Pierre Elliott
The CBC should have to go offline 72 hours before an election. The bias is thick.


David Amos
David Amos
@Pierre Elliott Methinks that may be the understatement of the evening N'esy Pas?


Pierre Elliott
 Rod Figueroa
Go Ford!


mo bennett
mo bennett
@Rod Figueroa STOP FORD WOULD BE A BETTER IDEA!


David Amos
David Amos
@mo bennett Methinks that you are the dude being stopped a lot tonight N'esy Pas?



Maintained by CBC poll analyst Éric Grenier, the Poll Tracker aggregates all publicly available polling data to follow the trends of the June 7th election.




Latest polls and projections

Updated on June 06, 2018

Poll averages


PC
38.3%
+0.5
NDP
36.1%
-0.1
LIB
19.0%
-0.3
GRN
4.9%
-0.3
OTH
1.6%
+0.1

Seat projections

minoritymajority
PC74
5388
NDP49
3663
LIB1
11
GRN0
1
OTH0

Probability of winning

88.3%
Probability of the Progressive Conservatives winning a majority
3.4%
Probability of the Progressive Conservatives winning the most seats but not a majority
2.4%
Probability of the NDP winning the most seats but not a majority
5.4%
Probability of the NDP winning a majority
Doug Ford's PCs have inched ahead of Andrea Horwath's New Democrats in the polls, but despite the close race in the popular vote the PCs have a better regional distribution of that vote and so are heavily favoured to win more seats. The NDP's forward momentum appears to have stalled. It is no coincidence that the Liberal slide has also slowed, leaving the party with just enough support to be competitive in a handful of ridings.


With a day to go, Ontario election is still Doug Ford's to lose

PCs began the campaign as favourites to win and remain so today, but much has changed



Éric Grenier· CBC News· Posted: Jun 06, 2018 11:43 AM ET

From left, Ontario Liberal Leader Kathleen Wynne, Progressive Conservative Leader Doug Ford and NDP Leader Andrea Horwath: polls indicate the election is still Ford's to lose, Éric Grenier writes. (David Donnelly photos/CBC)


On the first day of the Ontario election campaign, the race was Doug Ford's to lose. On the last day of the campaign, it remains the PC leader's race to lose — and he might just avoid doing that.

With less than 24 hours to go before the polls open and voters begin casting their ballots, the opinion polls show that the Progressive Conservatives are holding on to their slim lead over Andrea Horwath's New Democrats. And because of how the vote is projected to break down across the province, that likely is enough to give the PCs a majority government.

But it isn't a sure bet. A number of factors could conspire to prevent the PCs from attaining the 63 seats needed to form a majority government. The odds of that happening are low, but this has been a campaign full of surprises.

As of the morning of June 6, the CBC Poll Tracker— an aggregation of all publicly available polling data — suggests the PCs have about 38 per cent support. That's just enough to keep them ahead of the New Democrats, who stand at 36.5 per cent.

(The Poll Tracker will be updated with the final polls of the campaign as they are published — see here for the latest numbers.)

It's a far closer race than when the campaign began. The margin between the PCs and the New Democrats has shrunk by 13 points, as the PCs have dropped three points in the Poll Tracker over the course of the campaign while the NDP has soared by 10.


Recent Forum and Pollara polls have found that Doug Ford's unfavourable ratings with voters approach those of Kathleen Wynne. (Geoff Robins/Canadian Press)

The New Democrats were able to take some support away from the PCs, but the bulk of their gains came from the Liberals. At 19.1 per cent, Kathleen Wynne's party has plummeted seven points to what would be the worst performance in the party's history if the numbers are replicated when the votes are tabulated Thursday night.

The Greens have held steady at five per cent, but leader Mike Schreiner could make history himself by pulling off an upset in the riding of Guelph.

But this portrait has been in freeze-frame for two weeks now; since the May 24 update of the Poll Tracker, the PCs and NDP have been within two points of one another without exception.

The polls have been very consistent on this score, with no disagreements that cannot be explained away by normal sampling errors. It looks like a close race. Still, it might not turn out that way when the votes are turned into seats.

PCs favoured in number that counts


The Poll Tracker seat projection currently estimates that the most likely outcome for the PCs is 73 seats, well over the threshold for a majority government. Taking into account past polling errors and the imprecision of the seat projection model, the PCs could win between 54 and 86 seats — a range that is comfortable for the PCs and their majority prospects, but not a certainty.


More Ontarians had a positive view of the NDP's Horwath than a negative one, according to Forum and Pollara polls. (Galit Rodan/Canadian Press)
The New Democrats are projected to win between 38 and 63 seats, with 50 seats being the best guess. That gives them some overlap with the PCs, but requires that current polls overestimate PC support significantly, with virtually all of that error going in the NDP's direction rather than toward the Liberals.
Wynne has admitted already she won't be winning the election. But she does need to ensure her party reaches the bar of eight seats to retain official party status. The seat projection model thinks the Liberals could win as many as 11 seats — and as few as zero.

With the current likeliest outcome for the Liberals being one seat, that suggests the odds are better than not that the party will fall short of eight seats.

But all politics being local — and Wynne's admission included a plea for voters to elect Liberal MPPs in some ridings — there is the potential for the Liberals to out-perform expectations in a few seats.

NDP vote looks inefficient, but is it?


That the PCs are able to win many more seats than the NDP with only slightly more votes is due to the relative inefficiency of the NDP's support and the manner in which the first-past-the-post electoral system can reward a party that has even a modest lead in the popular vote.

The PCs are ahead in eastern Ontario and in the GTA-Hamilton-Niagara region, two regions that could get the PCs most of the way to a majority government on their own. The party could win more than two-thirds of the seats in the GTA-Hamilton-Niagara region with just 40 per cent of the vote, despite being barely ahead of the NDP. It could win three-quarters of the seats in eastern Ontario with the same 40 per cent vote share.

The New Democrats lead in Toronto and are narrowly ahead in southwestern Ontario, but are poised to win about as many seats as the PCs in these two parts of the province.


Wynne's party faces what would be the worst performance in its history if poll numbers are replicated in voting Thursday. (Andrew Ryan/Canadian Press)
Only in northern Ontario might the NDP's vote be efficient — delivering as much as 85 per cent of the region's seats with just 45 per cent of the vote. It doesn't help much, however, as there are only 13 seats in northern Ontario.

For this reason, the Poll Tracker estimates that the PCs have an 87 per cent chance of winning a majority government with these levels of support, with the NDP's chances being just six per cent. The odds of a minority government — about seven per cent — are low due to the Liberals not winning enough seats to make a minority government mathematically likely.

But changing turnout patterns could turn the projections on their head, making the NDP vote more efficient and the seat gap narrower than expected. The NDP's historic rise in the polls makes this possible if voters come out in unpredictable places. But how likely is that?

Turnout could favour PCs, but …


Polls suggest that the PCs are more likely to benefit from the turnout than the New Democrats. A poll by Léger has found that the PCs hold a six-point edge among voters 55 and older, a cohort that traditionally votes in large numbers. The same poll found the NDP ahead by four points among voters between the ages of 18 and 34, a group that has low turnout rates.

Both Pollara and Abacus Data found the PCs leading among votes already cast, with the PCs ahead by seven and four points, respectively, among Ontarians who voted in the advance polls. Those are ballots already in the system and counted, rather than hypothetical future votes that have yet to be cast.

But in the last provincial election in 2014, pollsters experimented with turnout models in an effort to avoid a repeat of the polling miss in British Columbia the previous year. And in every single case, the likely voter models did worse than a standard weighting to the general population.

Turnout was supposed to benefit the Ontario PCs in 2014 and give Tim Hudak a chance of winning. Instead, the PCs under-performed their polls and the Liberals won a majority government.

Events and undecideds


The roller coaster final days of the campaign have also injected a degree of uncertainty. Wynne's admission of defeat and plea for the election of enough Liberal MPPs to keep the PCs or the NDP to a minority government hasn't had an impact on the polls, but it could have an influence on local races.

Recently, Renata Ford — widow of Doug Ford's late brother Rob — went public with a lawsuit claiming a lack of support for her bereaved family and bad management of the family firm under Doug Ford. The allegations — which have not been proven in court, and which Ford denies — could undermine the PC leader's already waning popularity.

Forum and Pollara have recently found Ford's unfavourables approaching those of Wynne. Forum put the number of Ontarians disapproving of Ford at 55 per cent, just 10 points below Wynne's score, while Pollara also found 55 per cent of respondents reporting negative views of Ford — just three points below Wynne.

Significant portion undecided


In both polls, more Ontarians had a positive view of the NDP's leader than a negative one.
There is also a significant portion of the electorate that remains undecided, ranging as low as six to seven per cent (Léger and Mainstreet, respectively) and as high as 12 to 14 per cent (Pollara and Abacus). If those undecideds swing disproportionately to the NDP or the PCs, it could have a big impact on a close race.

Nevertheless, Doug Ford and the PCs retain significant advantages and are the favourites to secure a majority government going into election day, a position they have never given up from Day 1.

But keeping an eye on the final polls of the campaign is still a good idea — electoral law in Ontario allows for the reporting of new opinion surveys up until Wednesday night. Over the past four weeks, the Ontario election campaign has been full of surprises and has changed quickly. There's no reason it should be any different in the last 36 hours.

About the Author

 


Éric Grenier
Politics and polls
Éric Grenier is a senior writer and the CBC's polls analyst. He was the founder of ThreeHundredEight.com and has written for The Globe and Mail, Huffington Post Canada, The Hill Times, Le Devoir, and L’actualité.


Green Leader Mike Schreiner 'cautiously optimistic' he'll win in Guelph

'Guelph is leading in so many areas that reflect the Green party's values,' Schreiner says

Liam Casey· The Canadian Press· Posted: Jun 06, 2018 1:12 PM ET

Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner may be within reach of a historic win in his riding of Guelph in Thursday's provincial election. (CBC)


Mike Schreiner cannot walk the streets of downtown Guelph, Ont., without being stopped to talk politics.

"Good job Mike," one man says as he slaps the Green party leader on the back.

"We're working hard, eh!" the 48-year-old U.S.-born politician responds with a laugh. "Make sure you vote, no matter who it is."

"I'm voting for you," the man says.

Schreiner talks and walks fast. He's got his messaging down, his enthusiasm up.

His goal of becoming the first-ever elected Green member of the provincial legislature might be within reach, according to two recent polls that had him in the lead in Guelph, a riding held by Liz Sandals, a veteran Liberal who is not running this time around.
"The Liberal vote is collapsing in Guelph," Schreiner says.

"I'm also finding a lot of Conservatives coming our way as well and it's mostly driven by Doug Ford. I've had so many Conservatives in Guelph come up and say 'I won't vote for a Doug Ford-led Conservative party."'

'Cautiously optimistic'


In the 2014 election, Schreiner, who has led the provincial Greens since 2009, finished third with 19.29 per cent of the vote, just 1.5 percentage points behind the Progressive Conservative candidate, who is also not running this time, and ahead of the NDP.

"I'm cautiously optimistic we're going to elect our first Green MPP," Schreiner says as he canvasses his riding, where he lives in a modest semi-detached house with his wife and two teenage daughters.
Schreiner was born and raised in a farm in Kansas. He says love took him north in 1994 to Canada, where his wife became a professor at the University of Toronto.

A few years ago, Schreiner moved from Toronto to Guelph, where he has been working for decades. The city is ripe for a Green representative, he says. It's replete with clean-tech startups and a city council focused on renewable energy and protecting its water.

"Guelph is leading in so many areas that reflect the Green party's values," he says.


Ontario Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner gets set to make a policy announcement in his home riding of Guelph, Ont., on May 25. (Kenneth Armstrong/Canadian Press)

Greens 'have a shot'


His supporters are people of all ages and political stripes. At 70 years old, Elaine Duignan says she's volunteering for the first time with a political party. She's been an NDP supporter, but has fallen in love with Schreiner and his policies.

"I love his honesty, his integrity, his community involvement," says Duignan as she strolls around Guelph clad head-to-toe in green.

"You know it's hard to meet an honest politician."
Timothy Rogers says he's still deciding between Schreiner and NDP candidate Agnieszka Mlynarz. He usually oscillates between the NDP and the Liberals, both provincially and federally.

"I haven't ever voted Green and that's mostly because I didn't ever really think they had a chance," Rogers says.

"Now that they do have a shot, it would be really nice to have Green win Guelph — but I'm not 100 per cent decided."

Changed party brand


Schreiner is a known commodity in Guelph, through owning various small food businesses — his first was an organic food distribution operation.

Locally, people know the Greens are about more than just saving the planet, he says, but across the province there is still the preconceived notion that the party only cares about the environment.
"The perception of the party once was that we hug trees, wear Birkenstocks and smoke cannabis," he says. "I really changed the brand of the party as a small business owner and an environmentalist at the same time."

Some of his policies are obvious. He wants Ontario to move to 100 per cent renewable energy and wants to close the nuclear energy plant in Pickering. But others reflect realities in urban areas like Guelph. He'd roll mental health coverage into the Ontario Health Insurance Plan and he'd implement a basic income program.


Mike Schreiner walks down the street in Kitchener after his campaign launch earlier this month. (Emily Fearon/CBC)
Once a month, Schreiner and his team help serve breakfast at Lakeside HOPE House, a community centre that helps low-income and homeless people.

The centre hosted an all-candidates meeting last week, in which there was one rule — no mud slinging. Schreiner and the other candidates representing the NDP, the Liberal party, the Communist party and the None of the Above party took time to praise each other.
It fits with Schreiner's style, who has vowed publicly to avoid running a negative campaign.

"People are saying they're just sick and tired of the three parties, all the political spin, all the vague answers, all the attack ads, so here in Guelph, I think that's partially why I'm getting so much support," he says.

"Who knows, maybe we can break through in Guelph and one or two other ridings," he adds, "because I would sure like some company at Queen's Park."
 
Viewing all 3623 articles
Browse latest View live