https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 
 #nbpoli#cdnpoli


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/worksafenb-claims-auditor-general-report-1.4981326

WorkSafeNB claims process preventing injured workers from returning sooner: AG report

WorkSafeNB needs focus on return-to-work outcomes, says report

WorkSafeNB says it accepts all the auditor general's recommendations to improve its injured worker claims management. (CBC)


WorkSafeNB says it accepts all of the auditor general's recommendations to improve deficiencies in the Crown corporation's handling of injured worker claims.

Kim MacPherson's report, which focused on claim management, found the process lacks a return-to-work focus, creates unnecessary delays, needs new claim management software and suffers from a general lack of communication.

Those deficiencies are preventing injured workers from returning to work sooner, she said.

"What we found is that generally the policies and the practices within WorkSafe are in line with other workers' compensation organizations across the country," MacPherson told reporters Wednesday.

"But when it comes to managing injured worker claims, there is a lot WorkSafe can do to reduce the time the injured worker is off by ingraining in their processes this focus on return to work."
That focus will reduce the duration and cost of the claim, she said.

WorkSafeNB said in a statement Wednesday the recommendations are an "opportunity to improve the medical treatment and return to work outcomes."

"[The recommendations] fully align to the objectives of our business transformation that is currently underway to significantly improve process efficiencies and outcomes for injured workers and employers," the statement said.

Doug Jones, president and CEO of WorkSafeNB, thanked MacPherson in a tweet.







"The recommendations will help us be a better organization and provide the highest level of service to our clients," he said.

Daniel Theriault, chair of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal, agreed with MacPherson's statement that the recommendations will be "mutually beneficial" to injured workers and employers.

"Anytime you can speed up the process and try to get the injured worker back to work, it's good for the injured worker and it's certainly good for the employer," he said.

29 recommendations

The report outlined 29 recommendations to be implemented before the end of 2021. They include:

• Automate the claim management software to improve efficiency and tracking;
• Develop detailed case plans with return-to-work goals, proposed treatments, forecast recovery date;
• Have case managers speak with injured workers about their abilities and limitations in forming the return-to-work plan;
• Follow up with injured workers and health care providers about treatment and closely monitor claims;
• Train case managers to better understand specific types of injuries and refer those claims to them;
• Develop key performance indicators and targets for internal processes;
• Promote early referrals to the Workers' Rehabilitation Centre.

MacPherson said the Workers' Rehabilitation Centre in Grand Bay-Westfield is often used as a "last resort" in complex cases.

"[WorkSafeNB] should consider these complex cases going to the rehab centre earlier in their treatment plan, rather than waiting until after they've exhausted every other opportunity," she said.

Skyrocketing claims

The report, released Wednesday, is the second of two from the auditor general's office on WorkSafeNB in the past seven months. In June, MacPherson found the corporation is plagued by poor governance and lack of oversight.

The cost of claims has also skyrocketed in recent years. The figure soared more than $300 million since 2013, reaching $486 million in 2017, the report stated.

And New Brunswick employers are feeling the brunt in the premiums they pay. Starting Jan.1, they are paying $2.65 for every $100 of payroll — almost double what they were paying two years earlier.

Most, including MacPherson in her report, point to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal, a quasi-judicial tribunal that's independent of WorkSafeNB, as the reason for the ballooning costs.

Critics say the scope of its powers were too broad and that led to a high number of decisions being overturned.

MacPherson's report recommended amending legislation so that appeals go the issues resolution office before the tribunal.

Theriault, the tribunal chair, said it makes sense to consider the appeal internally before sending it to the independent body.

New legislation

In an effort to tackle rising premiums, the Higgs government passed legislation in December ending the tribunal's power to overrule WorkSafeNB policies when hearing claim cases.
Theriault, the tribunal chair, said he was consulted on the auditor general's first WorkSafeNB report, but not the second one. If he had been, Theriault said he would have clarified some of MacPherson's findings.

"I'm assuming she received her information mainly from WorkSafe ... and didn't challenge it," he said.

For instance, the report stated WorkSafeNB, due to WCAT decisions, continues to pay benefits for non-compensable injuries — something that's inconsistent with the rest of Canada.

Theriault said the tribunal is only following case law that dates back two decades.

The new legislation has changed that, he said, and WorkSafeNB will be introducing new policies.









 
David R. Amos
Methinks the time has come to talk of many things so said the Walrus N'esy Pas?

and Chucky said

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/worksafe-premiums-new-brunswick-premiums-1.4923562

The new Progressive Conservative government introduced legislation Tuesday that could see rates start to come down by the end of January, after three years of increases in the premiums paid by employers.

Charles Murray, who as ombud has had a longtime interest in workplace fairness in New Brunswick, said those increases were needed because WorkSafeNB ran irresponsible deficits, giving employers hundreds of millions of dollars in premium rebates and setting unrealistically low rates.

"I'd say WorkSafe has become a cautionary tale about what happens when an agency of government runs irresponsible deficits year after year and then is suddenly forced to face the reality of those decisions," he told Information Morning Fredericton on Wednesday.

Murray said that in the past 20 years there has been a "very stable system in the province, where rates hovered around $2."

But in recent years, he said, "huge" rebates on premiums were given to employers, and the fund for compensating injured workers was "drained of literally hundreds of millions of dollars."

"We took the fund from 140 per cent protection to 110 per cent protection in just a couple of years and surprise, surprise now the piper has to be paid. ... Now the money has to go back into the system."









Daniel Rawlins

David R. Amos









 
Harold Benson












Emilien Forest








https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/worksafe-nb-premiums-1.4944325

Employers to pay smaller WorkSafe premium increase than expected

Province promises other changes in law governing WorkSafeNB

Labour Minister Trevor Holder thanked all parties in the house for quick passage of the bill, which made the lesser premium increase possible. (CBC)

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices







David Amos




https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/worksafe-premiums-new-brunswick-premiums-1.4923562

Injured workers will pay price for lower WorkSafeNB premiums, ombud says

The PC government introduced legislation Tuesday which aims to reduce premiums

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 
#nbpoli#cdnpoli


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nurses-association-withdraws-lawsuit-language-commissioner-1.4981862


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:21:47 -0400
Subject: I just called Nurses Association of New Brunswick and they played dumb
so perhaps Michel Carrier and his SANB lawyer pals can explain why I called
N'esy Pas Serge Rouselle?
To: serge.rousselle@gnb.ca, Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, president@nanb.nb.ca,
 ljanes@nanb.nb.ca, jwhitehead@nanb.nb.ca, peter.lindfield@carlisleinstitute.org,
hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca ,brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
David.Coon@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
 kristar@frederictonchamber.ca, Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca,

Nurses withdraw lawsuit against language commissioner over licensing exam

Nurses group was angry with commissioner's report on failure rate by francophone nurses

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos,
We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
not be responding to further emails on this matter.

Department of Justice


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
did she take all four copies?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.





> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>


On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:

> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
> ilian.html
>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>> 6
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html


Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017

APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 
#nbpoli#cdnpoli



https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/maxime-bernier-saint-john-blaine-higgs-equalization-payments-1.4982399

Maxime Bernier applauds Higgs's call for cuts to equalization

 
David R. Amos










Bernard McIntyre









 
Marc LeBlanc











Marguerite Deschamps










 
Brian Dufoe










 
Douglas James











Rosco holt











 
Claude DeRoche

Maxime Bernier applauds Higgs's call for cuts to equalization

Leader of the People's Party spoke at a luncheon in Saint John on Thursday

Maxime Bernier gave a speech at a business luncheon in Saint John on Thursday. He said he approves of Premier Blaine Higgs's call to reduce equalization payments to the province to force governments to develop natural resources. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 
Methinks many folks are beginning to realize why I have been enjoying watching this circus so much lately N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/michael-cohen-says-rigging-polls-was-at.html


#nbpoli#cdnpoli#Trump#Trudeau#FBI#RCMP



https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/giuliani-trump-mueller-collusion-1.4983035

Giuliani just made it a lot harder for Trump to cry 'witch hunt'

  

Liam Young







https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 
Methinks its unthinkable to even consider that Trump would have to order his greedy Yankee lawyer to lie N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/michael-cohen-says-rigging-polls-was-at.html


#nbpoli#cdnpoli#Trump#Trudeau#FBI#RCMP
 

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/cohen-trump-buzzfeed-1.4983384

U.S. Congress to probe BuzzFeed report that Trump directed Cohen to lie

 
David R. Amos












Bill Nest







https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos 



CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/changes-rcmp-st-thomas-university-criminology-professor-1.4983344

Civilian RCMP watchdog could change culture if right people involved, prof says

  
David R. Amos




 
David R. Amos
"Michael Boudreau, a criminology professor in Fredericton, welcomed the step, although he is concerned the civilians will be former Mounties.

"Depending on who those former Mounties are that would be a step backwards," said Boudreau.

But he hopes the government will choose committee members who have been advocates for women in the RCMP and maybe even a "whistle blower" attuned to what's been happening in the force."

Methinks if anyone bothers to read my lawsuit they would understand that I am a bigtime "whistle blower" who is definitely attuned to what's been happening in the force. since 1982 N'esy Pas?










 
Rod McLeod

Civilian RCMP watchdog could change culture if right people involved, prof says

Michael Boudreau says he's 'cautiously optimistic' about promised oversight committee

Michael Boudreau, a St. Thomas University criminology professor, is hopeful the new civilian oversight committee will encourage more women to join the RCMP. (CBC)

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices|

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/campobello-ferry-border-crossing-1.4982051

Campobello ferry proponents say it's getting harder to cross border

 
Matt Steele








 
Don Smith










 
Harold Benson









Jim Cyr











David Peters

Campobello ferry proponents say it's getting harder to cross border

Federal public safety minister says new security regulations 'will not impinge' on Campobello residents

Campobello residents say it's getting increasingly difficult to travel through the United States to the rest of Canada. (Elaine Thompson/Associated Press)

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/new-ambulance-new-brunswick-policy-lets.html

#nbpoli#cdnpoli

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/ambulance-new-brunswick-bilingual-staffing-1.4984352

New Ambulance New Brunswick policy lets unilingual paramedics stay on for now

Jobs for which bilingual paramedics can't be found won't have to be reposted every 8 weeks

Medavie, which runs Ambulance New Brunswick, has stopped re-posting vacant bilingual positions every eight weeks. (CBC)

New Ambulance New Brunswick policy lets unilingual paramedics stay on for now

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices









 
David R. Amos

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Methinks politics and education are the reasons George Daley has his job as the president of New Brunswick Teachers' Association in the first place N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/httpstwitter.html

#nbpoli#cdnpoli


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/teachers-union-education-system-politics-auditor-general-1.4983045

Take politics out of education, says teachers' union leader

Auditor general’s report detailed instability in New Brunswick's education system

George Daley, president of New Brunswick Teachers' Association, says he wants politics out of the education system. (Catherine Harrop/CBC)



The head of New Brunswick's teachers' union says the voices of teachers have finally been heard, following the release of a report by the auditor general calling for stability in the provincial education system.

Kim MacPherson found that schools are failing to hit performance targets because frequent changes in education strategy "create instability and shift focus away from educating students."
"The system needs to stabilize," MacPherson said.

Her report explained that a student who started school in September 2004 would have experienced five different strategies, each with its own priorities, by the time they graduated.
George Daley, president of the New Brunswick Teachers' Association, offered another statistic: 37 major changes in the past 35 years.

"I now understand why I never felt I could never get my feet under me: because everything was always changing," Daley said.

"There was a new target, there was a new way of doing something, there was a new program, there was a new district office I had to deal with. It was always there."

 Assessments indicate students continue to fail to meet targets. Auditor General Kim MacPherson says each time government makes changes to the education plan, it filters down and impacts student performance. 11:06

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos
Welcome to the Circus

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/01/after-layoffs-cannabis-nb-employees-in.html


#nbpoli#cdnpoli


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/cannabis-nb-union-layoffs-jobs-1.4984222

After layoffs, Cannabis NB employees in 2 cities take steps to unionize

New Brunswick Union calls move to organize 'a step in the right direction'

A majority of employees at two of the 20 Cannabis NB locations in New Brunswick have signed union cards. (Julia Wright / CBC)



CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices

https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies




David Raymond Amos‏ @DavidRayAmos


#nbpoli#cdnpoli


https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-seed-royalties-meeting-1.4983351




---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 18:21:30 -0400
Subject: YO Wayne Easter are you LIEbranos nuts to pick a fight with farmers in an election year?
To: wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca, lawrence.macaulay@parl.gc.ca, ourfarmcsa@gmail.com
>. Thank you!

---

Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le chef de l’opposition
officielle du Nouveau-Brunswick.  Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel
sera examiné.

Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
ashley.beaudin@gnb.camedia-medias@gnb.ca>.  Merci!



---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:58:26 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: C'yall in Court
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.

If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com

If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<

>

<>


> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: pr@potashcorp.com; Podwika@potashcorp.com;
> fosterd@bennettjones.ca; corporate.relations@potashcorp.com;
> lgold.blcanada@b-l.com; shawn. graham; David.ALWARD@gnb.ca;
> krisaustin; jacques_poitras@cbc.ca; cjcw@nbnet.nb.ca;
> tomp.young@atlanticradio.rogers.com; nmiller@corridor.ca;
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca; atlbf@nb.aibn.com; akapoor@globeandmail.com;
> nmacadam@globeandmail.com; vepp@globeandmail.com;
> potash@mackenziepartners.com; contactus@kingsdaleshareholder.com;
> rick.hancox; Bernard.LeBlanc; Liebenberg, Andre;
> mclellana@bennettjones.com; MooreR; danfour; oldmaison@yahoo.com;
> Harris, Brendan; Dean.Buzza; Gilles. Blinn
> Cc: wcoady; michel.desneiges@sade-els.org; producers@stu.ca;
> WaterWarCrimes; Penny Bright; tony; Nasser, Jacques
> Subject: Fwd: PotashCorp should mention my concerns about their lack
> of ethical conduct and actions against me to your shareholers before
> you people buy much stock in their stock eh?
>
> With ANOTHER election in the near future I see no need to explain my
> issues again about  the exploitation of our natural resources to a
> bunch of sneaky lawyers.(everyboy shoul checkout the pdf hereto
> attache) especially our former Deputy Prime Minister Lanslide Annie
> McLelllan an the RCMP thought they knew everything seven years ago and
> did nothing let alone call me back just like you an your many
> conservative cohorts NEVER did EH Brucy Baby Northrup? (902 800 0369
> Notice my new contact number? You an the RCMP can forget Werner Bock's
> now)
>
> Clearly there is no need for politicians to try to be confidential
> with mean old me when the Globe and Mail loves spilling the beans
> sometimes ou woul think those unethical journlists woul know that
> simple truths spoken amongst common folk about corrupt politicians
> have a good habit of coming to the surface sooner or later anyway EH?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>


This message and any attached files may contain information that is
confidential and/or subject of legal privilege intended only for use
by the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient or
the person responsible for delivering the message to the intended
recipient, be advised that you have received this message in error and
that any dissemination, copying or use of this message or attachment
is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the information
therein. If you have received this message in error please notify the
sender immediately and delete the message.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:05:02 -0300
Subject: Mr Lee I just called you from 902 800 0369 after listening to
you on CAPAC last night perhaps we should talk ASAP
To: ian_lee@carleton.ca
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>

First and foremost do you see Eliot Spitzer testified on the very day
he thanked me for the info?  I ask again where did the transcripts and
webcasts go not long after I made the congressman Ron Paul and legions
of others well aware of their existence as he bitched about such
things whle running for the GOP endorcement to run for president in
2007? For the PUBLIC Record the records of the hearings were deleted
in late fall 2007 just as all the subprime morigages began to smell
bad.

http://banking.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Hearings.Hearing&Hearing_ID=90f8e691-9065-4f8c-a465-72722b47e7f2

Now check the dates on the letters in this file page 13 in particular

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf

Then read ths old email exchange

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/david-amos-to-wendy-olsen-on.html

Get it? If not call me will ya?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 22:56:05 -0300
Subject: Fwd: Wheras ol Whitey Bulger is now in custody Perhaps the
FEDS should review this old file ASAP EH Assange?
To: jcarney@carneybassil.com, "jacques.boucher"
<jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
"william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"<william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Wayne.Lang"<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>,
Daniel.Conley@massmail.state.ma.us, dboeri@wbur.bu.edu,
wburnews@wbmur.org, birgittajoy <birgittajoy@gmail.com>, "Julian
Assange)"<editor@wikileaks.org>, "Bathurst, News Max"
<maxnews@astral.com>, "mckeen.randy"<mckeen.randy@gmail.com>, "Frank.
McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>, "mclaughlin.heather"
<mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com>
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
editorial <editorial@thedailybeast.com>, "terry.seguin"
<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, nickysbirdy <nickysbirdy@yahoo.ca>, webo
<webo@xplornet.com>, "Loiseau, Frederic"
<frederic.loiseau@fredericton.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight"
<Barry.MacKnight@fredericton.ca>

http://www.wbur.org/2011/07/06/bulger-arraignment

http://carneybassil.com/team/carney/

From: magicJack <voicemail@notify.magicjack.com>
Subject: New VM (16) - 0:47 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from
7097728272
To: "DAVID AMOS"
Date: Monday, July 4, 2011, 6:16 AM

Dear magicJack User:

You received a new 0:47 minutes voicemail message, on Monday, July 04,
2011 at 09:16:24 AM in mailbox 902 800 0369 from 709 772 8272.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 20:02:45 -0300
Subject: Wheras ol Whitey Bulger is now in custody Perhaps the FEDS
should review this file ASAP?
To: "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"<william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Wayne.Lang"<Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, dean <dean@law.ualberta.ca>,
maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"greg.preston"<greg.preston@police.edmonton.ab.ca>, acampbell
<acampbell@ctv.ca>, LaytoJ <LaytoJ@parl.gc.ca>, godiny
<godiny@parl.gc.ca>, Ashfik1a <Ashfik1a@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: "terry.seguin"<terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"<oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
"richard. dearden"<richard.dearden@gowlings.com>

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf

Beginning on page 56 All of Whitey's lawyers will get the jitters

Notice Andrew Bulger?

http://www.bostonmagazine.com/articles/the_martyrdom_of_john_connolly/page4


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:18:17 -0300
Subject: Thanx for the call back
To: dboeri@wbur.bu.edu
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:35:19 -0300
Subject: "He looks forward to facing the charges against him," said
Bulger lawyer Peter Krupp
To: pkrupp@luriekrupp.com
Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, "Daniel.Conley"
<Daniel.Conley@massmail.state.ma.us>, "Daniel.Conley"
<Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:43:17 -0300
Subject: Thanx for listening to me I will call WBUR's David Boeri in
short order (617 353 1059)
To: wburnews@wbur.org, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>
Cc: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, oldmaison@yahoo.com, danfour
<danfour@myginch.com>, "jonesr@cbc.ca"<jonesr@cbc.ca>

I called and tried to talk to David Boeri because of what he said
recently within this video and what he wrote about Whitey na the Feds
over the years

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8mQTMZts0U

http://www.wbur.org/contact

FYI After I called a lot of parliamentarians, the RCMP and the FBI I
noticed this hit on a blog about me this morning. I have no doubt the
following emails is what they were reading so I called Fred Wyshak and
read him the riot act once again byway of his voicemail within the US
Attorney's Office and then called the WBUR newsroom

http://qslspolitics.blogspot.com/2008/04/david-amos-nb-nwo-whistleblower-part-3.html

QSLS Politics
By Location  Visit Detail
Visit 21,300
Domain Name   (Unknown)
IP Address   98.27.50.# (Unknown Organization)
ISP   Unknown ISP
Location   Continent  :  Unknown
Country  :  Unknown
Lat/Long  :  unknown
Language   English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System   Macintosh MacOSX
Browser   Safari 1.3
Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 4_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us)
AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.2 Mobile/8C148
Safari/6533.18.5
Javascript   version 1.5
Monitor   Resolution  :  768 x 1024
Color Depth  :  32 bits
Time of Visit   Jun 26 2011 4:45:39 am
Last Page View   Jun 26 2011 4:45:39 am
Visit Length   0 seconds
Page Views   1
Referring URL  http://www.google.co...1xsTVXbAU1_dhPR2fb0w
Search Engine  google.com
Search Words  fred wyshak
Visit Entry Page   http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html
Visit Exit Page   http://qslspolitics....leblower-part-3.html
Out Click
Time Zone   UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time   Jun 25 2011 10:45:39 pm
Visit Number   21,300


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 2:09 PM
Subject: Attn Fred Wyshak and Stockwell Day Here is some proof that I
was not joking with you last week
To: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, USAMA.MEDIA@usdoj.gov, W-Five@ctv.ca,
day.s@parl.gc.ca, "Harper.S@parl.gc.ca"Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, "Duceppe.
G"Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca, dions1@parl.gc.ca, "layton. j"
Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca, "lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca"
lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca, "fbinhct@leo.gov"fbinhct@leo.gov,
webo@xplornet.com, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"wally.stiles@gnb.ca
Cc: josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, "moore.r@parl.gc.ca"
moore.r@parl.gc.ca, kmearn@townofmilton.org, kmunro@yahoo-inc.com,
Ryan Johnson nelsonresisters@gmail.com, Alfonso Carcamo
alfonso@canucklinks.com, robin reid zorroboy@live.com, Byron Prior
alltrue@nl.rogers.com, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca"t.j.burke@gnb.ca,
thompson.g@parl.gc.ca, townhall@town.woodstock.nb.ca,
ted.tax@justice.gc.ca, townofsussex@sussex.ca, "thibault.
r"Thibault.R@parl.gc.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com"oldmaison@yahoo.com,
"bruce.noble@fredericton.ca"bruce.noble@fredericton.ca,
"faye.rammage@pcnb.org"faye.rammage@pcnb.org, Dan Fitzgerald
danf@danf.net, "danny.copp@fredericton.ca"danny.copp@fredericton.ca>

Some of the docments within this file are signed by your boss the US
Attorney Michael Sullivan and it was me he was trying to argue about a
great deal of money as he covered up for the actions of corrupt US
Treasury Agents Correct?

http://www.scribd.com/doc/2619437/CROSS-BORDER-

And this is a true copy of one of many American Polce surveilance
wiretap tapes that I have in my pssession many law enforcement
authorities in Canada and the USA have received and acknowledged
Correct?

http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139

Who the Hell do you think chucked them in the garbage in Boston many
years ago? Here is your clue.

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/09/16/conno
lly_portrayed_as_corrupt_agent/?page=full

Furthermore Didn't Connoly tell the bartender's daughter Whitey Bulger
buried some of his victims just outsife Yarmouth in the crooked
politician Robert Thibault's riding in Nova Scotia?

Must I sue you too Fred???

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:20 PM
Subject: Hey Fred Wyshak Say hey to your boss the US Attorney Michael
J. Sullivan for me will ya? In return I will say hey to Callahan's
family for you, Deal?
To: Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, USAMA.MEDIA@usdoj.gov, w-five W-Five@ctv.ca, "
t.j.burke@gnb.ca"t.j.burke@gnb.ca, oldmaison.wcie@gmail.com, "
bruce.northrup@gnb.ca"bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, "bev.harrison@gnb.ca"
bev.harrison@gnb.ca, "bruce.noble@fredericton.ca"
bruce.noble@fredericton.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca
Cc: "moore.r@parl.gc.ca"moore.r@parl.gc.ca, "
william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca"william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "
ken.cook@fredericton.ca"ken.cook@fredericton.ca, "
Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca"Kathy.Alchorn@fredericton.ca,
kelly.lamrock@gnb.ca, kmearn@townofmilton.org, kmunro@yahoo-inc.com, "
wayne.steeves@gnb.ca"wayne.steeves@gnb.ca, "wally.stiles@gnb.ca"
wally.stiles@gnb.ca, josie.maguire@dfait-maeci.gc.ca, Ryan Johnson
nelsonresisters@gmail.com

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Raymond Amos noreply-comment@blogger.com
Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:49 PMy Hey to
Subject: [Just Dave] New comment on Just Dave.
To: David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com

David Raymond Amos http://www.blogger.com/profile/06553336660119659315 has
left a new comment on the post "Just Dave

http://davidamos.blogspot.com/2006/04/just-dave.html?ext-ref=comm-sub-email
":

From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 3:47 PM
Subject: Attn Willi Burgess perhaps you should read what i just posted
in my blog or other people's wesites
To: j.ford@shaw.ca, newbobjoy@shaw.ca, donna.clarkson@shaw.ca,
edphclarke@shaw.ca, tkiers@shaw.ca, kristiansen@shaw.ca,
chalko@liberalalberta.ca, info@timuppal.ca, info@voterona.ca,
RajotJ1@parl.gc.ca, info@mikelake.ca, info@brentrathgeber.com,
info@voterahimjaffer.com, info@lauriehawn.ca, info@petergoldring.com,
info@votejasonkenney.ca, info@jimprentice.ca, info@votedianeablonczy.ca,
info@votelee.ca, info@reelectdeepakobhrai.com, info@devindershory.com,
info@robanders.com, info@robmerrifield.ca, info@kevinsorenson.ca,
blake@voteblake.ca, info@blainecalkins.ca, info@brianstorseth.ca,
info@voteleonbenoit.ca, earl.dreeshen@shaw.ca, vote4warkentin@canada.com,
vote4ted@tedmenzies.ca, casson@rickcasson.ca, info@brianjean.ca
Cc: lindaduncan@ndp.ca, daveburkhart@ndp.ca, chughes@albertandp.ca,
barbphillips@ndp.ca, nevc@shaw.ca, anand47@yahoo.com, hanarazga@ndp.ca,
pricerg@telus.net, raymartin@ndp.ca, braunmw@telusplanet.net,
donnamartyn@shaw.ca, cameronwakefield@shaw.ca, marie.read@greenparty.ca

My concerns are far from confidential never mind what I know about
BANKERS and the US Treasury Dept etc

MURDER is a capital crime CORRECT? Connoly the ex FBI Agent's long
delayed trial started today and I am the guy with the wiretap tapes
that he threw out long ago. Why the Hell do you think I took such a
chance with the corrupt RCMP last week and recorded me serving a copy
of one wiretap tape upon them in Youtube before your boss Stevey Boy
Harper had his buddy the
Governor General drop the writ?

Scroll down you will see that I am no liar. I posted this email there as
well.

Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos

Just Dave By Location
*Visit Detail**
Visit 5,486*
Domain Name verizon.net
IP Address 71.184.227.# (Verizon Internet Services)
ISP Verizon Internet Services
Location
Continent : North America
Country : United States
State : Massachusetts
City : Winchester Lat/Long : 42.4547, -71.1502 (Map)
Language English (U.S.) en-us
Operating System Microsoft WinNT
Browser Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1; .NET CLR
2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506)
Javascript version 1.3
Monitor Resolution : 1152 x 864
Color Depth : 32 bits
Time of Visit Sep 15 2008 3:06:40 pm
Last Page View Sep 15 2008 3:06:40 pm
Visit Length 0 seconds
Page Views 1
Referring URL http://www.google.co...ess
winchester%2C ma
Search Engine google.com
Search Words "john b. callahan" address winchester, ma
Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html
Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo.../03/me-and-bush.html
Out Click
Time Zone UTC-5:00
Visitor's Time Sep 15 2008 2:06:40 pm
Visit Number 5,486


FEDERAL EXPRESS February 7, 2006

Senator Arlen Specter
United States Senate
Committee on the Judiciary
224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Mr. Specter:

I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
contact with you about this previously.

Very truly yours,
Barry A. Bachrach
Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com

http://www.scribd.com/doc/60818237/FCC-News-Corp

http://www.newscorp.com/news/news_499.html

http://www.oeclaw.co.uk/contact.asp

http://corporate.sky.com/about_sky/our_board_and_management/board.htm

http://www.businessinsider.com/newscorp-loses-general-counsel-when-rupert-murdoch-needs-legal-help-the-most-2011-7

http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11943/governance-issue-may-loom-newscorp/

http://www.corporatesecretary.com/articles/11949/newscorp-searches-legal-help-help-combat-us-lawsuits/

http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/politics/66-want-murdoch-to-sell-bskyb-shares-1.1113963

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/business/media/09newscorp.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/24/business/media/joel-klein-ex-schools-chief-leads-internal-news-corp-inquiry.html

http://www.newscorp.com/news/news_499.html

http://corporate.sky.com/about_sky/our_board_and_management/board.htm#9d3732f5b0f343aaab547a63163df246

http://www.newscorp.com/corp_gov/bod.html

http://www.newscorp.com/news/news_228.html

http://www.deadline.com/2011/06/surprise-at-news-corp-general-counsel-lawrence-jacobs-leaves/

http://www.thesoaprevolution.com/documents/SOSFOXCONTACTS.pdf