https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks it rather obvious to me that Mr Jones and his NB Power pals must not have my email to them today N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/02/questionable-florida-investment-by-nb.html
#nbpoli#cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-eub-rate-hearing-joi-scientific-1.5453633
· CBC News· Posted: Feb 06, 2020 6:00 AM AT
NB Power CEO Gaëtan Thomas posed with Joi Scientific executives Robert Koeneman and Traver Kennedy on a beach in Cape Canaveral, Fla. The utility spent $13 million on a licensing agreement with Joi Scientific. (Joi Scientific)
NB Power began an application for a $29.7-million rate increase in front of the Energy and Utilities Board on Wednesday with a surprise change of heart about asking customers to pay extra for its controversial investment in the Florida hydrogen company Joi Scientific.
"We thought it was important to notify the panel NB Power has recently decided it will not seek to recover the cost incurred for the licensing agreement with Joi Scientific," said Darren Murphy, NB Power's chief financial officer and senior vice-president, minutes into what is expected to be a six-day hearing.
"As a result, we are reducing the cost of our application accordingly."
NB Power had been applying for a two per cent rate increase on all of its customers beginning April 1 to raise an extra $29.7 million in revenue for next year.
But Murphy said NB Power decided just before the hearing began it was not appropriate to ask customers to pay about $1.34 million in amortization and interest expenses the utility will incur this year on the investment it made in Joi Scientific.
NB Power CFO Darren Murphy opened the EUB hearings saying the utility will not seek to recover the money it spent on Joi Scientific through customers. (CBC)
That will likely force it to lower its rate request to 1.9 per cent.
NB Power invested a total of $7.3 million of its own money in Joi Scientific and was planning on recovering that from utility customers over a six-year period, according to the rate application it first filed with the EUB four months ago.
That remained the plan until utility executives appeared in person at the rate hearing Wednesday.
"We appreciate the late nature of our notice," said Murphy.
Joi Scientific claimed to have developed a method to efficiently generate hydrogen gas from seawater to generate electricity on demand. It would have been a major scientific breakthrough and, in 2016, senior NB Power officials, including President Gaëtan Thomas, became convinced it could work.
The utility helped raise $13 million, partly from NB Power funds and partly from the New Brunswick government, to obtain licensing rights for the technology.
But at the EUB, Keith Cronkhite, NB Power's senior vice-president of business development and strategic planning, said the utility was never supposed to invest its own money in the scheme and did so only after the federal government declined a funding request.
Cronkhite said it would not be reasonable to ask NB Power customers to pay it back for something it had not intended to spend money on in the first place.
"The objective here was not to have a direct investment from NB Power," said Cronkhite.
"Half of the licensing arrangement was obtained through provincial support. The goal was to obtain the other half of the funding requirement from the federal government to complete that support.
"The bottom line is these efforts were done at the outset and the intent was never to have this borne by the customers of New Brunswick Power."
Last year, NB Power spent additional money attempting to engineer a way to get Joi Scientific's technology to market, but Cronkhite said those efforts failed.
"There was a provision whereby we would take efforts to commercialize, to scale up the technology for deployment," he told public intervenor Heather Black.
NB Power VP Keith Cronkhite said it's not reasonable to ask ratepayers to pay back the money the utility spent on Joi Scientific. (Robert Jones/CBC)
"The advances that were anticipated relative to the electronics and the ability to simplify the testing of the rig did not develop as we would have anticipated."
In December, New Brunswick Energy Minister Mike Holland announced the province, as NB Power's sole shareholder, did not want the utility to pour any more money into Joi Scientific.
"At this particular moment I have not been presented with any proof of viability," said Holland about the technology.
NB Power's rate hearing continues Thursday.
38 Comments
David Amos
Methinks it rather obvious to me that Mr Jones and his NB Power pals must not have my email to them today N'esy Pas?
BruceJack Speculator
Quote from the article: " . .. Cronkhite said it's not reasonable to ask ratepayers to pay back the money the utility spent on Joi Scientific...."
Sorry, but does that mean executives plan to pay it back from personal sources other than their salaries? Otherwise, who besides the ratepayers gives money to NB Power? If it is the NB Govt that sells bonds to pay it back, that is a loan payed again by "taxpayers" instead of "ratepayers" but still the same source is it not?
David Amos
David Amos
Reply to @BruceJack Speculator: At least Cronkhite has a real name and a job. What it is you do?
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @DavidRayAmos @alllibertynews and 49 others
Methinks it rather obvious to me that Mr Jones and his NB Power pals must not have my email to them today N'esy Pas?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/02/questionable-florida-investment-by-nb.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-power-eub-rate-hearing-joi-scientific-1.5453633
Questionable Florida investment by NB Power in spotlight at rate hearing
Utility and province spent $13M on licensing rights for technology claiming to generate hydrogen from seawater
· CBC News· Posted: Feb 06, 2020 6:00 AM AT
NB Power CEO Gaëtan Thomas posed with Joi Scientific executives Robert Koeneman and Traver Kennedy on a beach in Cape Canaveral, Fla. The utility spent $13 million on a licensing agreement with Joi Scientific. (Joi Scientific)
NB Power began an application for a $29.7-million rate increase in front of the Energy and Utilities Board on Wednesday with a surprise change of heart about asking customers to pay extra for its controversial investment in the Florida hydrogen company Joi Scientific.
"We thought it was important to notify the panel NB Power has recently decided it will not seek to recover the cost incurred for the licensing agreement with Joi Scientific," said Darren Murphy, NB Power's chief financial officer and senior vice-president, minutes into what is expected to be a six-day hearing.
"As a result, we are reducing the cost of our application accordingly."
NB Power had been applying for a two per cent rate increase on all of its customers beginning April 1 to raise an extra $29.7 million in revenue for next year.
But Murphy said NB Power decided just before the hearing began it was not appropriate to ask customers to pay about $1.34 million in amortization and interest expenses the utility will incur this year on the investment it made in Joi Scientific.
NB Power CFO Darren Murphy opened the EUB hearings saying the utility will not seek to recover the money it spent on Joi Scientific through customers. (CBC)
That will likely force it to lower its rate request to 1.9 per cent.
NB Power invested a total of $7.3 million of its own money in Joi Scientific and was planning on recovering that from utility customers over a six-year period, according to the rate application it first filed with the EUB four months ago.
That remained the plan until utility executives appeared in person at the rate hearing Wednesday.
"We appreciate the late nature of our notice," said Murphy.
Joi Scientific's dubious claims
Joi Scientific claimed to have developed a method to efficiently generate hydrogen gas from seawater to generate electricity on demand. It would have been a major scientific breakthrough and, in 2016, senior NB Power officials, including President Gaëtan Thomas, became convinced it could work.
The utility helped raise $13 million, partly from NB Power funds and partly from the New Brunswick government, to obtain licensing rights for the technology.
Cronkhite said it would not be reasonable to ask NB Power customers to pay it back for something it had not intended to spend money on in the first place.
"The objective here was not to have a direct investment from NB Power," said Cronkhite.
"Half of the licensing arrangement was obtained through provincial support. The goal was to obtain the other half of the funding requirement from the federal government to complete that support.
"The bottom line is these efforts were done at the outset and the intent was never to have this borne by the customers of New Brunswick Power."
Failed bid to reach market
Last year, NB Power spent additional money attempting to engineer a way to get Joi Scientific's technology to market, but Cronkhite said those efforts failed.
"There was a provision whereby we would take efforts to commercialize, to scale up the technology for deployment," he told public intervenor Heather Black.
NB Power VP Keith Cronkhite said it's not reasonable to ask ratepayers to pay back the money the utility spent on Joi Scientific. (Robert Jones/CBC)
"The advances that were anticipated relative to the electronics and the ability to simplify the testing of the rig did not develop as we would have anticipated."
In December, New Brunswick Energy Minister Mike Holland announced the province, as NB Power's sole shareholder, did not want the utility to pour any more money into Joi Scientific.
"At this particular moment I have not been presented with any proof of viability," said Holland about the technology.
NB Power's rate hearing continues Thursday.
38 Comments
David Amos
Methinks it rather obvious to me that Mr Jones and his NB Power pals must not have my email to them today N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Methinks my friend Roger Richard made NB Power kinda nervous too N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @David Amos: NEW BRUNSWICK ENERGY and UTILITIES BOARD
Matter 458
IN THE MATTER OF an application by New Brunswick Power Corporation for approval of the schedules of rates for the fiscal year commencing April 1st 2020.
Held at the Delta Hotel, Saint John, N.B. on February 5th 2020.
DR. RICHARD: Now Mrs. Mitchell if you want to go to document NBP 1.27. Page 4. Go a little bit at the bottom of the page. Ok. Are all your unions due to negotiate their contracts in 2020?
MR. MURPHY: Yes, I believe as indicated here, we currently have our distribution in customer service in transmission collective agreements currently under negotiation and the generation and nuclear ones, current collective agreements would terminate December of ’19. So they, you know, in due course subsequently will be negotiated during the 2020 year.
DR. RICHARD: Will it affect our financial plan?
MR. MURPHY: So recognizing these collective agreements were due, we would make assumptions around the cost of renegotiating the collective agreement, and we would build that into our forecast both in the test year and in the 10-Year Plan. So there would be assumptions in there in recognition of the fact that these were coming1 due and providing some provision for their negotiation.
DR. RICHARD: That must explain why the union letter is the only letter from the public that is for the increase in electricity prices. Thank you for your time.
Matter 458
IN THE MATTER OF an application by New Brunswick Power Corporation for approval of the schedules of rates for the fiscal year commencing April 1st 2020.
Held at the Delta Hotel, Saint John, N.B. on February 5th 2020.
DR. RICHARD: Now Mrs. Mitchell if you want to go to document NBP 1.27. Page 4. Go a little bit at the bottom of the page. Ok. Are all your unions due to negotiate their contracts in 2020?
MR. MURPHY: Yes, I believe as indicated here, we currently have our distribution in customer service in transmission collective agreements currently under negotiation and the generation and nuclear ones, current collective agreements would terminate December of ’19. So they, you know, in due course subsequently will be negotiated during the 2020 year.
DR. RICHARD: Will it affect our financial plan?
MR. MURPHY: So recognizing these collective agreements were due, we would make assumptions around the cost of renegotiating the collective agreement, and we would build that into our forecast both in the test year and in the 10-Year Plan. So there would be assumptions in there in recognition of the fact that these were coming1 due and providing some provision for their negotiation.
DR. RICHARD: That must explain why the union letter is the only letter from the public that is for the increase in electricity prices. Thank you for your time.
BruceJack Speculator
Reply to @David Amos: was that the intervener who was going on about the dangerous radiation from electric meters . . . yeah that surely made a difference? , , , any good evidence of the hazard, compared to wifi in the house or cell phone in the hand ? ?
BruceJack Speculator
Quote from the article: " . .. Cronkhite said it's not reasonable to ask ratepayers to pay back the money the utility spent on Joi Scientific...."
Sorry, but does that mean executives plan to pay it back from personal sources other than their salaries? Otherwise, who besides the ratepayers gives money to NB Power? If it is the NB Govt that sells bonds to pay it back, that is a loan payed again by "taxpayers" instead of "ratepayers" but still the same source is it not?
David Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @BruceJack Speculator: Methinks all the usual suspects should quit complaining about NB Power and the government etc and do something. At least my friend Roger Richard ran for public office and intervened in several EUB matters just like I did. Obviously there is a PUBLIC EUB Hearing going on in Saint John right now. Why not attend? At the very least clever crybabies parked in front of computers should go to the EUB website and download the transcripts in order to read what my friend has been saying before the board on behalf of ordinary folks such as I N'esy Pas?
David Amos
Reply to @BruceJack Speculator: At least Cronkhite has a real name and a job. What it is you do?