The United States and Canada share what's been known as the longest undefended border in the world, because of the neighbourly sentiment between the nations. Now defence has become irrelevant, because Canadian lawmakers have effectively invited an invasion by U.S. border authorities.
In the political climate of President Donald Trump's Muslim ban and Facebook groups comprising bigoted customs agents, Canadians travelling to or through the U.S. need to pay close attention to their withering rights.
While far less violent than the horrors at the southern boundary of the United States, problems arising across the northern U.S. line are alarming. Incidents of racial profiling against travellers of colour have risen significantly, and the number of people turned back by U.S. border guards has seen an increase in recent years.
The most recent incursion by U.S. border officials comes in the form of amendments made earlier this year to the set of laws that facilitate cross-border movement, known as the Canada-United States Preclearance Agreement.
Travellers on their way from Canada into the United States should be aware that these changes, ostensibly enacted to increase the efficiency of travel and trade across the boundary, give U.S. officials dangerously extended power in Customs preclearance areas on Canadian ground.
U.S. officials can now carry sidearms in these preclearance zones, conduct strip searches, record and keep passenger information, and detain Canadian citizens.
Even if a Canadian official is "unwilling" to conduct a search or has deemed a detainment unnecessary, a U.S. official can override that call. In other words, Canadian law enforcement can now be countermanded within Canada by Americans.
This new authority also allows U.S. border guards to deny Canadians their right of withdrawal. Before the amendment to the law was enacted, if a person felt at all uncomfortable in the course of preclearance questioning she could simply leave, retracting her intention to cross the border with no penalty.
Now, as a result of amendments, the guard is entitled to detain her if he finds "reasonable grounds" to do so. And the request to leave in itself could be construed as reasonable grounds.
Each new provision in the Preclearance Agreement comes with a similarly vague, deeply troubling caveat. For example, the new subsection 39(2) says, "A border services officer or other public officer is not permitted, in a preclearance area or preclearance perimeter, to exercise any powers of questioning or interrogation, examination, search, seizure, forfeiture, detention or arrest except to the extent that such powers are conferred on the officer by the laws of the United States."
In other words, authoritarian behaviour is prohibited — except as the U.S. deems necessary.
The intention of equivocal statements such as these can only be a broader interpretation of the limit (or limitlessness) of American power.
Scarier still is the provision that undergirds every amendment to the agreement: that U.S. border officials will not be held accountable for impropriety.
In the exact language of the bill, "no action or civil proceeding may be brought against a U.S. preclearance officer in respect of anything that is done or omitted in the exercise of their powers, or the performance of their duties and functions under the legislation."
So there will be no repercussions for anything committed in the exercise of their powers.
This is a menacing leniency in our era of partisan conflict and rampant xenophobia.
Groups such as the Iranian Canadian Congress have expressed concern at these new broad powers, perturbed at their potential: "With the rise of discriminatory instances against Iranians in both Canada and the United States, and the current political climate between Iran and the two countries, removing the safeguards for withdrawing allows preclearance officers the ability to racially profile Iranian-Canadians with no restrictions or recourse for Iranian-Canadians."
It cannot be left to the whims and biases of individual U.S. officials to decide what happens to Canadian citizens in Canada. Trump encourages prejudice and discourages international partnership.
There is a staggering hypocrisy in building a wall — or a moat full of alligators— at the border to the south, while extending jurisdiction across the border to the north.
Under Trump's leadership, any latent intolerance among border-protection agents is given room to roam. For Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to allow the practices of such an administration to seep over the borderline onto Canadian soil is to condone the behaviour of Trump's regime.
Worse, Trudeau's government is empowering foreign officials and disempowering Canadian citizens. He is kowtowing to American imperialism.
This column is part of CBC's Opinion section. For more information about this section, please read our FAQ.
H.M. Jocelyn, a dual Canadian-American citizen, was born in Stratford, Ont., and grew up spending school years in New York City. As a border studies scholar in the American Studies PhD program at Rutgers University-Newark, she continues to cross the international boundary between the two nations many times a year. Her previous publications include a chapter in Critical Insights: American Short Story (Salem Press, 2015) and articles in The Journal of American Studies and in Interdisciplinary Literary Studies: A Journal of Criticism and Theory.
Reply to @Shannon Clark: I learned recently that the US can potentially have a plane grounded if they want to arrest you - suspect this is only for “big fish”
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Stanley Baird: Its true but define "Big Fish"
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @David Railton: YUP
Karen King
Reply to @Myles Grant: with online shopping I have not set foot in the USA in years and no intention of doing so again. The ones near the border will be most upset about this. The rest of us have other options.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Karen King: Years ago a friend of mine lost his right to fly overseas if the air travel involved the USA in anyway. Whereas the plane had to land in the USA to refuel the Yankee border guards in Canada became involved. Once they found out he was prosecuted for smoking dope when he was a kid he was not allowed to board the plane. When he complained about the cost of the ticket being lost the Yankees just laughed.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @christopher smith: Methinks there is a wealthy Chinese Lady who wishes she had avoided Canada because our politicians think and act a lot like Yankees these days N'esy Pas?
