mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:02:22 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the email I promised to send the
> Canadian Construction Association after I tried to discuss Karl
> Bélanger's political nonsense with them
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "OfficeofthePremier, Office PREM:EX"<Premier@gov.bc.ca>
> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:02:28 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Here is the email I promised to send the
> Canadian Construction Association after I tried to discuss Karl
> Bélanger's political nonsense with them
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write. I appreciate hearing feedback
> and suggestions from the people of British Columbia as we work
> together to build a better BC.
>
> Due to the volume of incoming messages, this is an automated response
> to let you know that your email has been received and will be reviewed
> at the earliest opportunity.
>
> In the event that your inquiry more appropriately falls within the
> mandate of a Ministry or other area of government, staff will refer
> your email for review and consideration.
>
> Again, thank you for writing.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> John Horgan
> Premier
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Premier <PREMIER@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:02:24 +0000
> Subject: Automatic Reply
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email to Premier McNeil.
>
> This is an automatic confirmation your email has been received.
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> Premier's Correspondence Team
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 17:02:22 +0000
> Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
> message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
> and questions from constituents.
>
> I receive a much larger volume of correspondence (postal and email)
> than the average MP. All emails are reviewed on a regular basis,
> however due to the high volume of emails my office receives, I may not
> be able to respond personally to each one.
>
> My constituents in Saanich-Gulf Islands are my highest priority. If
> you are a constituent, please email
> elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca<mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca>. To
> help me serve you better, please ensure that your email includes your
> full name and street address with your postal code.
>
> For meeting requests and invitations, please email
> requests@elizabethmaymp.ca<mailto:requests@elizabethmaymp.ca>
>
> Thank you once again for contacting me.
>
>
> Elizabeth May, O.C.
>
> Member of Parliament
>
> Saanich - Gulf Islands
>
> Leader of the Green Party of Canada
>
> --
>
> Je vous remercie d'avoir communiqué avec moi. La présente réponse vous
> confirme que votre message a été reçu. Les questions et les
> commentaires des électeurs sont toujours les bienvenus.
>
> Je reçois une correspondance (postale et électronique) beaucoup plus
> abondante que le député type. Tous les messages électroniques sont lus
> régulièrement, mais, en raison de l'abondance des courriels reçus à
> mon bureau, il se peut que je ne sois pas en mesure de répondre
> personnellement à chacun d'entre eux.
>
> Mes électeurs de Saanich-Gulf Islands passent en premier. Si vous êtes
> un électeur, veuillez écrire à
> elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca<mailto:elizabeth.may.c1a@parl.gc.ca>.
> Pour m'aider à mieux vous servir, veillez à ce que votre courriel
> comporte votre nom complet, votre adresse municipale et votre code
> postal.
>
> Pour les demandes de rencontre et les invitations, veuillez écrire à
> requests@elizabethmaymp.ca<mailto:requests@elizabethmaymp.ca>.
>
> Je vous remercie encore d'avoir communiqué avec moi.
>
>
> Elizabeth May, O.C.
>
> Députée à la Chambre des communes
>
> Saanich-Gulf Islands
>
> Chef du Parti vert du Canada
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 14:02:15 -0300
> Subject: Here is the email I promised to send the Canadian
> Construction Association after I tried to discuss Karl Bélanger's
> political nonsense with them
> To: mvanburen@cca-acc.com, rgilbert@cca-acc.com,
> cmontpetit@cca-acc.com, jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca,
> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, andre@jafaust.com,
> COCMoncton@gmail.com, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
> David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
> jonathongatehouse@me.com, elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca,
> Paul.Manly@parl.gc.ca, premier@ontario.ca, premier@gnb.ca, premier
> premier@gov.ab.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, premier@leg.gov.mb.ca,
> premier@gov.bc.ca, PREMIER@gov.ns.ca, premier@gov.pe.ca,
> premier@gov.yk.ca,  premier@gov.nl.ca, premier@gov.nt.ca
> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, karl.belanger@dcf.ca,
> thomas.mulcair@umontreal.ca, Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca,
> brian.gallant@gnb.ca, wblomme@broadbentinstitute.ca,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, dominic.leblanc.c1@parl.gc.ca,
> Jane.Philpott@parl.gc.ca
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/greens-rise-occasions-attacks-1.5240860
>
> Why other parties are paying attention to Elizabeth May
>
> Some polls suggest that the federal race for bronze is tightening
> Jonathon Gatehouse · CBC News · Posted: Aug 09, 2019 4:00 AM ET
>
> "Karl Bélanger, a former principal secretary to Mulcair and the
> national director of the NDP, says he's not sure that the Greens pose
> a real threat, as seat projections show them making a modest gain from
> their current pair of MPs. But there is a danger in the growing
> "narrative" in the media that has the two leftist parties competing
> for third place, he said.
>
> "I'd advise the NDP to keep Jagmeet Singh going after Justin Trudeau,
> and let other people take on Elizabeth May," said Bélanger. "Because
> the truth is that the Greens are getting votes from all political
> parties, not just the NDP."
>
>
> Thomas Mulcair
> Professeur invité
> Faculté des arts et des sciences - Département de science politique
> Pavillon Lionel-Groulx office C-3130
> thomas.mulcair@umontreal.ca
> 514 343-6111 #54794
>
>
> https://en.dcf.ca/board_members
>
>
> The Douglas-Coldwell Foundation
> Jack Layton Building
> 300-279 Laurier Ave W.
> Ottawa, ON K1P 5J9 Canada
> Phone: (613) 232-1918
> Fax: (613) 230-9950
> Email: info@dcf.ca
>
>
> President
> Karl Bélanger
>
> Vice-President
> Derek de Vlieger
>
> Executive Secretary
> Amy Boughner
>
> Treasurer
> Past President
>
>
> Board of Directors
>
> Mohammad Akbar
>
> Rebecca Blaikie
>
> Lorne Calvert
>
> Heather Fraser
>
> Melissa Hunter
>
> Miles Krauter
>
> Chris Markevich
>
> Irene Mathyssen
>
> Jay Ramasubramanyam
>
> Anne Scotton
>
> Jonathan Weier
>
> https://www.broadbentinstitute.ca/broadbent_institute_and_douglas_coldwell_foundation_launch_reflection_on_status_of_social_democracy_in_canada
>
>
> Broadbent Institute and Douglas-Coldwell Foundation launch reflection
> on status of social democracy in Canada
> on March 13, 2017
> Posted by Broadbent Institute
>
> OTTAWA — The Broadbent Institute and the Douglas-Coldwell Foundation
> are partnering to convene a national discussion on social democracy in
> Canada, on the occasion of our nation’s 150th birthday in 2017.
>
> As the country looks to this milestone, Canadians will be reminded of
> the role played by the thought and practice of social democracy in
> fashioning much of what generations have held most dear about Canada,
> whether it is public health care, protection of workers’ rights, or a
> generous system of social provision.
>
> “Social democracy transformed daily life in Canada and most other
> advanced economies in the 20th century, as governments delivered
> virtually full employment, rising wages and access to social programs
> and public services. The result was much greater equality of both
> condition and opportunity, enhanced security for all, and broadly
> shared economic progress in a still market based economy,” said Ed
> Broadbent, Chair of the Broadbent Institute.
>
> “As we celebrate Canada’s 150th anniversary, it is vitally important
> to reflect on this historical experience, and to re-examine the
> intellectual sources of social democratic achievement. An important
> first step is to take a closer look at Canada’s rich progressive
> traditions and their significant accomplishments for Canadians,”
> stated Karl Bélanger, President of the Douglas-Coldwell Foundation.
>
> The initiative is being launched with the publication of a discussion
> paper, Reflections on the Social Democratic Tradition by the Broadbent
> Institute’s Senior Policy Advisor, Andrew Jackson. The paper,
> available here, provides a political history, overview and critical
> evaluation of the social democratic project in Western politics - and
> in Canada in particular - in this moment of upheaval, inequality and
> decline in democracies around the globe.
>
> Since the 1980s, the market-restricting structures of social democracy
> have been under attack. As David Frum has pointed out, in launching
> this attack Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan deliberately set out
> to destroy social democracy.
>
> “The result,” said Mr. Broadbent, “has been an increase in
> environmental degradation, the financial crisis of 2008 and especially
> the alarming increase in inequality - culminating in the rise of
> right-wing populism.”
>
> Reflections on the Social Democratic Tradition will set the stage for
> the Broadbent Institute’s project Change the Game – an in-depth
> reflection on not only what history teaches us, but on what might
> constitute genuinely progressive policy advocacy in the months and
> years ahead.
>
> -30-
>
> For more information please contact:
> Willy Blomme, Program Director at the Broadbent Institute
> wblomme@broadbentinstitute.ca (514) 699-4636
>
> Karl Bélanger, President of the Douglas-Coldwell Foundation
> karl.belanger@dcf.ca (613) 232-1918
>
>
> https://conference.cca-acc.com/speaker/karl-belanger/
>
> Karl Bélanger
> President, Traxxion Strategies
>
> Founding President of Traxxion Strategies, Karl Bélanger possesses 20
> years of experience on Parliament Hill and in the spheres of the
> nation’s capital. During his political career, Karl served four
> successive NDP leaders, particularly as senior press secretary for
> Jack Layton and principal secretary for Thomas Mulcair.
>
> After his tenure in office as leader of the NDP in 2016, Karl retired
> from active politics to become a consultant and political analyst. In
> addition to a daily column on Drainville PM on Cogeco’s 98.5 FM
> station in Montreal, he appears regularly on CTV’s Power Play and
> RDI’s Mordus de politique. He also publishes a column on Loonie
> Politics and contributes to L’Actualité.
>
> Karl is also president of the Douglas-Coldwell Foundation, a
> charitable organization which has as mandate the promotion of
> education and research on social democracy in Canada.
>
> @TraxxionStrat   traxxion.ca
> 09:00 — Election forecast 2019
>
> Warren Kinsella
> Allison Smith
> Karl Bélanger
>
> Simultaneous interpretation I Poinciana Ballroom
>
> Let’s discuss what the leadup to the next federal election is likely
> to bring us. Will the Liberal government be re-elected? What will the
> main issues be? Will the political parties be able to fulfill their
> promises?
>
>
> https://www.cca-acc.com/contact-us/
>
> If you have questions on the Canadian Construction Association’s (CCA)
> annual conference, don’t hesitate to contact our events team.
>
> 1900-275 Slater Street
> Ottawa ON K1P 5H9
> Tel: 613-236-9455
> Fax: 613-236-9526
> infoconference@cca-acc.com for general inquiries
> inforegistration@cca-acc.com for registration-related inquiries
> Contact CCA staff responsible for the annual conference
>
> Chantal Montpetit
> Director, Meetings & Conferences
> Ext: 406
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Iqra.Khalid@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 19:35:58 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Federal Court File No T-1557-15,
> SNC-Lavalin, Trudeau and the OECD etc pursuant to my calls today here
> is the email I promised to send
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for contacting the office of MP Iqra Khalid. Your email is
> very important to us and we will respond to you as soon as possible.
>
> If your matter is urgent, please call our office at 905-820-8814 for
> Mississauga, or 613-995-7321, for Ottawa.
>
> If your email is pertaining to any immigration matter or a service
> Canada issue, our Community Office will be very happy to assist you.
> Please feel free to walk in the office during the weekdays from 10:00
> AM to 5:00 PM (we break for lunch from 1-2 PM).
>
> The Community Office address for the residents of Mississauga - Erin
> Mills is as follows :
>
> Community Office of Iqra Khalid, MP
> 3100 Ridgeway Drive
> Suite 35
> Mississauga, Ontario
> L5L 5M5
> Phone : 9058208814
> Fax : 9058204068
>
>
> We look forward to serving you.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 15:35:36 -0400
> Subject: RE Federal Court File No T-1557-15, SNC-Lavalin, Trudeau and
> the OECD etc pursuant to my calls today here is the email I promised
> to send
> To: JUST@parl.gc.ca, Arif.Virani@parl.gc.ca, Iqra.Khalid@parl.gc.ca,
> Ali.Ehsassi@parl.gc.ca, Ron.McKinnon@parl.gc.ca,
> Michael.Cooper@parl.gc.ca, dave.mackenzie@parl.gc.ca,
> Michael.Barrett@parl.gc.ca, lisa.raitt@parl.gc.ca,
> rfife@globeandmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> David.Akin@globalnews.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, irwincotler@rwchr.org,
> darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca
>
> https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/JUST/Members
>
>
> Contact the Committee
> Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights
> Sixth Floor, 131 Queen Street
> House of Commons
> Ottawa ON K1A 0A6
> Canada
> E-mail: JUST@parl.gc.ca
> Fax: 613-947-3089
> Website: ourcommons.ca/JUST-e
> Committee Staff
> Marc-Olivier Girard, Clerk of the Committee
> 613-996-1553
> Vanessa Robillard, Committee Assistant
> Chloé Forget, Analyst
> Library of Parliament
> Lyne Casavant, Analyst
> Library of Parliament
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:29:38 -0400
> Subject: 3433 RE SNC-Lavalin Trudeau and the OECD Attn Don Houle,
> Denis Jasmin, William McNamara and Stephen LeDrew pursuant to my calls
> you will find this email at the bottom of my blog about you dudes
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:24:19 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE SNC-Lavalin Trudeau and the OECD Attn Don
> Houle, Denis Jasmin, William McNamara and Stephen LeDrew pursuant to
> my calls you will find this email at the bottom of my blog about you
> dudes
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
> Merci
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 01:24:20 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE SNC-Lavalin Trudeau and the OECD Attn Don
> Houle, Denis Jasmin, William McNamara and Stephen LeDrew pursuant to
> my calls you will find this email at the bottom of my blog about you
> dudes
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 21:24:10 -0400
> Subject: RE SNC-Lavalin Trudeau and the OECD Attn Don Houle, Denis
> Jasmin, William McNamara and Stephen LeDrew pursuant to my calls you
> will find this email at the bottom of my blog about you dudes
> To: investors@snclavalin.com, wmcnamara@torys.com,
> ledrew@stephenledrew.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, GOVintegrity@oecd.org,
> Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca, Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> cblatchford <cblatchford@postmedia.com,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
> Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
> mcu@justice.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
> David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, rfife@globeandmail.com>,
> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2019/03/t-1843-18-snc-lavalin-group-inc-et-al-v.html
>
> Denis Jasmin, CPA, CA
> Vice-President, Investor Relations
> 455 René-Lévesque Blvd. West
> Montreal, Quebec
> Canada, H2Z 1Z3
> +1 514-393-8000 ext. 57553
>
> Don Houle 513 393 8000 ext 56370
>
> investors@snclavalin.com
>
>
> ---------- Original  message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 12:05:00 -0400
> Subject: YO Pierre Poilievre RE SNC-Lavalin I just called again and
> managed to speak to Craig Patrick Hilimoniuk but he didn't have much
> time for me just like David Lametti's people
> To: pierre.poilievre.a3@parl.gc.ca, michael.chong.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> David.Lametti.a1@parl.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
> charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca, Amarjeet.Sohi.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> hannelie.stockenstrom@snclavalin.com, charles.nieto@snclavalin.com,
> Hartland.Paterson@snclavalin.com, PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com,
> tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca, scott.bardsley@canada.ca,
> mcu@justice.gc.ca, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
> fiacobucci@torys.com, justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca, coi@gnb.ca,
> MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca, David.Eidt@gnb.ca,
> Newsroom@globeandmail.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
> sfine@globeandmail.com
>
> https://www.nationalobserver.com/2019/03/05/news/snc-lavalin-lawyer-iacobucci-urged-resign-trudeaus-trans-mountain-envoy
>
> SNC-Lavalin lawyer Iacobucci urged to resign as Trudeau's Trans Mountain
> envoy
> By Alastair Sharp in News, Energy, Politics | March 5th 2019
>
> 'Not a shrinking violet'
>
> The UBCIC's Wilson said Iacobucci would ideally step down from his
> role leading the Trans Mountain expansion consultations, but should at
> least choose to remove himself from one of the files.
>
> “I think he’s embroiled in SNC and that he should stay over there but
> step down from the Trans Mountain pipeline one,” she said. “I would
> prefer him to step down from that one (the Trans Mountain pipeline)
> but maybe the majority of Canadians would prefer him out of SNC, I
> don’t know.”
>
> “He made a mess over there, we don’t want him to make a mess over here.”
>
> Wilson said the government's handling of both files showed a startling
> lack of transparency.
>
> “With SNC, we don’t know what was said to Minister Jody
> Wilson-Raybould or in the thousands of lobby meetings between SNC and
> the government," she said. "We also don’t know how Trans Mountain was
> handled in the inner core of the prime minister’s office and the
> various ministries involved, especially now that they are owners of
> the pipeline.”
>
> She pointed out the SNC-Lavalin could clearly benefit from
> construction and engineering contracts if Trans Mountain gets built.
>
> SNC-Lavalin employs about 9,000 people across Canada who work on
> projects in a variety of sectors, including oil, gas and pipelines.
>
> A spokesman for SNC-Lavalin declined to comment when asked about
> Iacobucci's dual roles. Iacobucci didn't respond to a request for
> comment.
>
> In May 2018, Canada’s elections watchdog laid charges against a former
> SNC executive, accusing him of orchestrating illegal federal political
> donations the company made, mostly to Liberal groups, as well as to
> Conservatives, more than a decade ago.
>
> During an emergency debate about the SNC-Lavalin scandal on Feb. 28,
> Green Party Leader Elizabeth May stood in the House of Commons to muse
> about Iacobucci's role in two key files it is juggling.
>
> "Frank Iacobucci is not a shrinking violet. He is playing an
> interesting role here. I wonder if my friend finds it's curious in any
> way that SNC-Lavalin's lawyer was the choice of the prime minister to
> run the Indigenous consulations in the repairing of the flawed
> consultations on the Kinder Morgan pipeline," she said, during an
> exchange in the Commons with Conservative MP Michael Barrett, who
> represents the Ontario riding of Leeds-Grenville-Thousand Islands.
> "And he is still playing that role, while he is also SNC-Lavalin's
> lawyer."
>
> Barrett responded by saying that nothing surprises him at this point.
>
> Hartland Paterson
> Executive Vice President & General Counsel:
> Called to the bar: 1987 (QC)
>
> Charles Nieto
> Senior Legal Counsel:
> Called to the bar: 1995 (QC)
> SNC-Lavalin Inc.
> 455 boul. René-Lévesque o.
> Montréal, Québec H2Z 1Z3
> Phone: 514-393-8000 Ext: 522668
> Fax: 514-866-5057
> Email: charles.nieto@snclavalin.com
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 22:48:08 -0400
> Subject: ATTN Anthony Housefather Your boss Trudeau cannot stop your
> friend Jody Wilson-Raybould talking about Re Federal Court File No
> T-1557-15 Correct?
> To: anthony.housefather@parl.gc.ca, Kathleen.Harris@cbc.ca, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, "wayne.easter"<wayne.easter@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Hon.Chrystia.Freeland"<Hon.Chrystia.Freeland@canada.ca>,
> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca>, "steve.murphy"
> <steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,
> TCromwell@blg.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca, jp.lewis@unb.ca,
> Hunter.Tootoo@parl.gc.ca, tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, JagmeetForBurnaby@ndp.ca,
> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>,
> "Michael.Wernick"<Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
> <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-wilson-raybould-snc-lavalin-1.5033639
>
>
> Wilson-Raybould says PMO restricting her ability to 'speak freely' at
> Justice committee Wednesday
>
>
> Former attorney general has been granted broad waiver on cabinet
> confidence, solicitor-client privilege
> Kathleen Harris · CBC News · Posted: Feb 26, 2019 10:59 AM ET
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:02:14 -0400
> Subject: Re: ATTN Murray Rankin and David Lametti Re Federal Court
> File No T-1557-15 I just called again Correct?
> To: "Murray.Rankin"<Murray.Rankin@parl.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
> <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
> <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "bruce.northrup"<bruce.northrup@gnb.ca>,
> "Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Alaina.Lockhart"
> <Alaina.Lockhart@parl.gc.ca>, "David.Lametti"
> <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, washington field
> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Dale.Morgan"
> <Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, media@ndp.ca,
> "Nathalie.Drouin"<Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca>, "nathan.cullen"
> <nathan.cullen@parl.gc.ca>, "charlie.angus"<charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Murray.Rankin@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:00:50 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Murray Rankin and David Lametti Re
> Federal Court File No T-1557-15 I just called again Correct?
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> For British Columbia media inquiries please email Krystal at
> Murray.Rankin.C1@parl.gc.ca
> For National media inquiries please email Charlotte at
> Murray.Rankin.A2@parl.gc.ca
> ---
> Thank you for taking the time to contact me and to express your views.
> I acknowledge receipt of your email.
> While my team and I read all correspondence, the volume of emails we
> receive means that I am not able to respond immediately to every
> message. Every effort will be made to reply to you as soon as
> possible. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd or forwarded mail will not
> receive a response.
> If you are a constituent of Victoria seeking assistance with a federal
> service or program, then please ensure your email included your full
> name, address, postal code, telephone number, and the details of your
> situation so that my office is able help you efficiently. If the
> matter is time-sensitive, then please call my office directly at
> 250-363-3600. If we are unable to answer your call immediately, please
> leave a voicemail and we will return your call at our earliest
> opportunity. Please be assured that all email sent to this office is
> treated as confidential.
>
> My team and I look forward to continuing our hard work for the
> residents of Victoria.
> Sincerely,
>
> Murray Rankin, Member of Parliament
> Victoria
> NDP Justice Critic and Deputy House Leader
> New Democratic Party
> ________________________________________________________
> Victoria: 250-363-3600 | Ottawa: 613-996-2358 | www.murrayrankin.ca
>
> UFCW 232
>
>
>
> On 2/26/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> http://murrayrankin.ndp.ca/ndp-calls-for-investigation-into-former-attorney-general-s-firing
>>
>>
>> NDP calls for investigation into former Attorney General’s firing
>>
>> February 8th, 2019 - 4:06pm
>>
>> NDP Critic for Justice Murray Rankin made the following statement:
>>
>> “Canadians have a right to question whether this Prime Minister fired
>> Canada’s first Indigenous Justice Minister for ‘speaking truth to
>> power’.
>>
>> The government has denied the Prime Minister or his backroom advisors
>> fired Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould because she refused to yield to
>> pressure in the SNC-Lavalin matter.
>>
>> Canadians have to be assured the independence of the justice system
>> has not been compromised.  In these circumstances, Canadians cannot be
>> expected to take the Prime Minister’s word for it.
>>
>> As Vice Chair of the Justice Committee, I have joined with MP Michael
>> Cooper in calling for the former Attorney General, the current Justice
>> Minister, and high-ranking officials in the Prime Minister’s Office to
>> appear before the Justice Committee as soon as possible.
>>
>> My NDP colleagues, Nathan Cullen and Charlie Angus, have also written
>> to the Ethics Commissioner to ensure an investigation by that office
>> is undertaken.
>>
>> The integrity of our justice system may well be at issue. The Liberal
>> government must allow the Justice Committee to do its work on behalf
>> of Canadians and clear the air at this critical time.”
>>
>>
>>
>>   – 30 –
>>
>>
>>
>> For more information, please contact:
>>
>> NDP Media Centre: 613-222-2351 or media@ndp.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:35:05 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA, the CRA and the IRS YO Donald J.
>> Trump Jr. why does your ex lawyer Mr Cohen and the Canadain FEDS
>> continue lie after all this time???
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>
>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>> carefully reviewed.
>>
>> We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
>>
>> -------------------
>>
>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>
>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>> adressée au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
>> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>>
>> Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "LSD / DSJ (JUS/JUS)"<BPIB-DGPAA@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 19:25:31 +0000
> Subject: RE: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason
> with David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> This confirms receipt of the message that you recently sent to the
> Legal Systems Division or to the Justipedia Team of the Legal
> Practices Branch. We will review your message and reply within
> forty-eight (48) hours. Please do not reply to this email.
>
> ***
>
> La présente confirme réception du message que vous avez fait parvenir
> à la Division des systèmes juridiques ou à l’équipe de Justipédia de
> la Direction générale des pratiques juridiques. Nous réviserons votre
> message et vous répondrons dans les quarante-huit (48) heures.  Prière
> de ne pas répondre au présent courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:25:26 -0400
> Subject: Fwd: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason
> with David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
> To: Support@viafoura.com, darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca,
> carrie@viafoura.com, allison@viafoura.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, LPMD-DGPD@justice.gc.ca,
> Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 15:00:58 -0400
> Subject: YO Pierre Poilievre I just called and tried to reason with
> David Lametti's minions and got nowhere fast Surprise Surprise
> Surprise N'esy Pas Petev Baby Mackay?
> To: pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca, olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca,
> David.Lametti.a1@parl.gc.ca, maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca,
> andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca, charlie.angus@parl.gc.ca,
> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com, tony.clement.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, scott.bardsley@canada.ca,
> scott.brison@parl.gc.ca, scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Beverley.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca
>
> Official Languages Directorate
>
> Telephone: 613-957-4967
> Fax: 613-948-6924
> Email: olad-dlo@justice.gc.ca
> Address: Official Languages Directorate
> Department of Justice Canada
> 350 Albert Street, 3rd floor
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2019 17:58:23 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: C'yall in Court
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:45 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
> addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in
> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
> carefully reviewed.
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>
> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
> adressée à la ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir
> un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous
> assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>
> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
> message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
> Vancouver Granville.
>
> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>
> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>
>
>
> Merci
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 22:18:49 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law
> school too N'esy Pas Pierre Poilievre?
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thanks very much for getting in touch with me!
>
> This email is to acknowledge receipt of your message and to let you
> know that every incoming email is read and reviewed.  A member of my
> Wellington-Halton Hills team will be in touch with you shortly if
> follow-up is required.
> Due to the high volume of email correspondence, priority is given to
> responding to residents of Wellington-Halton Hills and to emails of a
> non-chain (or "forwards") variety.
>
> In your email, if you:
>
> *         have verified that you are a constituent by including your
> complete residential postal address and a phone number, a response
> will be provided in a timely manner.
> *         have not included your residential postal mailing address,
> please resend your email with your complete residential postal address
> and phone number, and a response will be forthcoming.
>
> If you are not a constituent of Wellington Halton-Hills, please
> contact your Member of Parliament.  If you are unsure who your MP is,
> you can find them by searching your postal code at
> http://www.ourcommons.ca/en
>
> Any constituents of Wellington-Halton Hills who require urgent
> attention are encouraged to call the constituency office at
> 1-866-878-5556 (toll-free in riding). Please rest assured that any
> voicemails will be returned promptly.
>
> Once again, thank you for your email.
>
> The Hon. Michael Chong, M.P.
> Wellington-Halton Hills
> toll free riding office:1-866-878-5556
> Ottawa office: 613-992-4179
> E-mail: michael.chong@parl.gc.ca<mailto:michael.chong@parl.gc.ca>
> Website : www.michaelchong.ca<http://www.michaelchong.ca>
>
> THIS MESSAGE IS ONLY INTENDED FOR THE USE OF THE INTENDED RECIPIENT(S)
> AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, PROPRIETARY AND/OR
> CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
> notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> copying, conversion to hard copy or other use of this communication is
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have
> received this message in error, please notify me by return e-mail and
> delete this message from your system.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:18:40 -0400
> Subject: Methinks David Lametti should go back to law school too N'esy
> Pas Pierre Poilievre?
> To: David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca,
> pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca,mcu@justice.gc.ca,
> michael.chong@parl.gc.ca, Michael.Wernick@pco-bcp.gc.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, serge.rousselle@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 15:44:16 -0400
> Subject: Jagmeet Singh says that maybe Jay Shin should go back to law
> school??? Too Too Funny Indeed EH Karen Wang and Laura-Lynn Tyler
> Thompson?
> To: info@jayshin.ca, jay@lonsdalelaw.ca, karenwang@liberal.ca,
> lauralynnlive@gmail.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com, kgawley@burnabynow.com
>
> Jagmeet Singh on Tory opponent: 'Maybe he should go back to law school'
> Conservative candidate Jay Shin said Singh was 'keeping criminals out
> of jail' during his days as a criminal defence lawyer
> Kelvin Gawley Burnaby Now January 13, 2019 10:27 AM
>
> Julie MacLellan
> Assistant editor, and newsroom tip line
> jmaclellan@burnabynow.com
> Phone: 604 444 3020
> Kelvin Gawley
> kgawley@burnabynow.com
> Phone: 604 444 3024
>
> Jay Shin
> Direct: 604-980-5089
> Email: jay@lonsdalelaw.ca
> By phone: 604-628-0508
> By e-mail: info@jayshin.ca
>
> Karen Wang
> 604.531.1178
> karenwang@liberal.ca
>
> Now if Mr Shin scrolls down he will know some of what the fancy NDP
> lawyer has known for quite sometime
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Singh - QP, Jagmeet"<JSingh-QP@ndp.on.ca>
> Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 16:39:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court File # T-1557-15 and the
> upcoming hearing on May 24th I called a lot of your people before High
> Noon today Correct Ralph Goodale and Deputy Minister Malcolm Brown?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> For immediate assistance please contact our Brampton office at
> 905-799-3939 or jsingh-co@ndp.on.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Kennedy.Stewart@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 18:18:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Minister Ralph Goodale and Pierre
> Paul-Hus Trust that I look forward to arguing the fact that fhe Crown
> filed my Sept 4th email to you and your buddies
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Many thanks for your message. Your concerns are important to me. If
> your matter is urgent, an invitation or an immigration matter please
> forward it to burnabysouth.A1@parl.gc.ca or
> burnabysouth.C1@parl.gc.ca. This email is no longer being monitored.
>
> The House of Commons of Canada provides for the continuation of
> services to the constituents of a Member of Parliament whose seat has
> become vacant.  The party Whip supervises the staff retained under
> these circumstances.
>
> Following the resignation of the Member for the constituency of
> Burnaby South, Mr. Kennedy Stewart, the constituency office will
> continue to provide services to constituents.
>
> You can reach the Burnaby South constituency office by telephone at
> (604) 291-8863 or by mail at the following address: 4940 Kingsway,
> Burnaby BC.
>
> Office Hours:
>
> Tuesday - Thursday: 10am - 12pm & 1pm - 4pm
> Friday 10am - 12pm
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 05:54:40 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: ATTN Blair Armitage You acted as the Usher
> of the Black Rod twice while Kevin Vickers was the Sergeant-at-Arms
> Hence you and the RCMP must know why I sued the Queen Correct?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
> directed to 646-853-0114.
> ________________________________
> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its affiliates.
> Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic
> signature under applicable law.
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Mr. Amos,
> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>
> Department of Justice
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Eidt, David (OAG/CPG)"<David.Eidt@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:33:21 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Mr Lutz howcome your buddy the clerk
> would not file this motion and properly witnessed affidavit and why
> did she take all four copies?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until Monday, March 13, 2017. I will have
> little to no access to email. Please dial 453-2222 for assistance.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau.nb.ca>
> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:16:46 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE: The New Brunswick Real Estate
> Association and their deliberate ignorance for the bankster's benefit
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I will be out of the office until  August 15, 2016. Je serai absent du
> bureau jusqu'au 15 août 2016.
>
>
>
>
>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>
>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>>  Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>
>
> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>> ilian.html
>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>> 6
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>
>
> Sunday, 19 November 2017
> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
> The Supreme Court
>
> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>
> Amos v. Canada
> Court (s) Database
>
> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
> Date
>
> 2017-10-30
> Neutral citation
>
> 2017 FCA 213
> File numbers
>
> A-48-16
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>
> THE COURT
>
>
>
> Date: 20171030
>
> Docket: A-48-16
> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
> CORAM:
>
> WEBB J.A.
> NEAR J.A.
> GLEASON J.A.
>
>
> BETWEEN:
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
> Respondent on the cross-appeal
> (and formally Appellant)
> and
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
> Appellant on the cross-appeal
> (and formerly Respondent)
> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>
> I.                    Introduction
>
> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
> (Claim at para. 96).
>
> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
> Prothontary’s Order).
>
>
> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>
>
> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
> cross-appeal.
>
>
> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>
> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
> several judges but did not name those judges.
>
> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
> c. F-7:
>
>
> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
> Appeal.
> […]
>
> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
> […]
> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>
> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>
>
> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
> section.
> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
> matière civile et pénale.
> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>
> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>
>
> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
> appeal book.
>
>
> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
> conflict in any matter related to him.
>
>
> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>
>
> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
> such judge had a conflict.
>
>
> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
> was a member of such firm.
>
>
> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>
>
> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
> apprehension of bias:
> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
> reasonable apprehension of bias:
> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>
> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
> (4th) 193).
>
> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>
>
> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>
>
> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>
>
> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>
>
> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
> events from over a decade ago.
> (emphasis added)
>
> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
> Webb hearing this appeal.
>
> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>
> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>
> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>
> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
> to recuse himself.
>
> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>
> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>
>
> III.               Issue
>
> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>
> IV.              Analysis
>
> A.                 Standard of Review
>
> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>
> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
> interfere.
>
>
> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
> Prothonotary’s Order?
>
> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>
> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
> (…)
>
>
> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
> [footnotes omitted].
>
>
> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
> para. 27).
>
>
> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>
>
> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>
> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>
> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>
> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>
> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>
> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>
> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
> of process…
>
> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>
> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
> absent a legal or p...

[Message clipped]  View entire message