---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 12:35:15 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Former military ombudsman claims DND vendetta drove him into retirement To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:46:28 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: YOr Ralph Goodale Methinks this should stress the Integrity of the Globe and Mail and your minions in the RCMP N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read with care. However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21, there may be a delay in processing your email.
Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada. Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera lu avec soin. Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel.
David Raymond Amos@DavidRayAmos Replying to @DavidRayAmos@alllibertynews and 49 others Methinks minions under Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan and Ombudsperson Gregory Lick and their lawyers must have read statement 83 of my lawsuit on file in Federal Court (T-1557-15) by now N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos@DavidRayAmos Replying to @DavidRayAmos@alllibertynews and 49 others Carson Brook said: "look at the CBC ombuds office - rests easy about ignoring citizen concerns about quality of journalism and fact basing in political news room"
Former military ombudsman claims DND vendetta drove him into retirement
394 Comments And now the deletions begin way past closing time as per CBC's MO
The Tally of comments as of 10pm on the 24th is now 411
Jill Bennet It is a good election question question: will any of the Federal Parties make a committment to change the the Ombudsman reporting to Parliament vs. the Minister of Defense.
Partisanship this is raised again? Or is this a genuine act of patriotism, in service to Canada and institutional health? It seems more like the latter, regardless of the accuracy of any findings on this guy (right or wrong or railroaded, smeared)
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jill Bennet: Methinks a far A better election question to ask is why am I sue the Queen 3 more times. Trust that if veterans would bother to read statement 83 of my lawsuit in Federal Court they would have many questions to ask the Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan and his boss Mr Prime Minister Trudeau The Younger. Anyone can Google "David Raymond Amos versus Her Majesty the Queen T-1557-15" in order to read it N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos Reply to @Jill Bennet: Whereas I am running for a seat in Parliament again. I should remain open and accountable for my actions to the electorate until the election is over. Trust that anyone can feel free to scroll to the bottom of my lawsuit for my contact info and give a call. If they leave me a message with a real name and phone number I would be more that happy to return their call and explain my concerns in great detail.
David Raymond Amos Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Statement 83 within "David Raymond Amos versus Her Majesty the Queen T-1557-15" Begins as follows
The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over five years after he began his bragging:
January 13, 2015 This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
December 8, 2014 Why Canada Stood Tall!
Friday, October 3, 2014 Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And Stupid Justin Trudeau
Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to redeploy troops from there to Iraq.
Jill Bennet It doesn't sound like Minister Sajjan is trusted? Personally, I think there is too much power concentration in the PMO, especially under majority governments.
Harper's time: confidentiality breaches of veteran private and confidential health records shared among the government bureaucracy right up to a PR department, for spin? Why was it there?
Trudeau Government: the Norman case and the power of the Irving family, what were their paws doing on that? This was PCO related? We don't get to find out-- where's our assurance, this practice stops? Where is the acvountability for that? Were the wrong-doers fired? SNCL. . . contempt for judicial independence?
It's damaging to our institutions and the public trust.
After the Liberal party railing over the "Harper Dictatorship"-- what changed?
"Walbourne, while still in office, asked to be made an officer of Parliament and that was rejected by Sajjan.
More recently, newly appointed Veterans Ombudsman Craig Dalton asked the Liberal government for an independent review of his mandate — one that would include the possibility of him reporting independently and directly to Parliament, instead of to the minister.
Following cross-Canada meetings with veterans groups, advocates and individual former soldiers, Dalton said he's become concerned there's a lack of trust in his office and that it is perceived as too close to the minister."
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jill Bennet: Methinks everybody knows that I crossed paths with Craig Dalton when in was still in the Canadian Forces and then again when he worked for the Government of New Brunswick long before he took his new position in PEI N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos Reply to @Jill Bennet: Anyone can easily verify what I just stated is true by merely Googling two names
David Raymond Amos Craig Dalton
Jill Bennet Reply to @David Raymond Amos: You actually want to enter into that fray?
Good luck to you. :-)
It looks painfully messy at times, even though I believe there are a lot of good people working hard and delivering good services for our veterans and for Canada, but. . .
I don't think I would want enter that, without some really solid mental help-- this Ombudsman role looks set up for so much pain and personal suffering and burnout-- it's broken- and it's unethical to be confined in repirting to just the minister of defense.
And I beleive the politics can be so full of toxic stress, that it's hard to imagine that people of genuine good will could even tolerate it, lol. That's why we have what have in there, because a logical assessment of it, I think could lead to a rational decision that it's just healthy and not worth harming oneself, risk burnout, and longer term harm to oneself.
It looks like vipers' nest to me, lol. I don't see how an honest, rational, thinking person of honour and with values could last that long in that pit, lol But some do-- they're all stuck in the all the muck, I'm sure.
I think it could suck one's soul right out. It's a maochistic choice, unless one is properly strengthened with a protective dose of cynicism, lol Strong mental health help and good healthy daily routines of self-care.
It truly looks really awful and would be hard to bear for a person who genuinely cares. It just looks that aweful in there, lol
Do I wish you success? I don't know if I could wish that viper pit of political life on to anyone? So, I'll just wish you happiness. Keep your chin up. And do everything you can to build up your resilience and well being, because you'll need it for that.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jill Bennet: This is the 7th time I have run for public and if you read what else I posted you would have understood that I have been suing the Queen since Harper was the boss
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jill Bennet: "I beleive the politics can be so full of toxic stress, that it's hard to imagine that people of genuine good will could even tolerate"
Al Clark Reply to @David Raymond Amos: I have never run for office and have almost as many votes as you naysay paw??
David Raymond Amos Methinks the Office of the Minister of National Defence knows I am a man of my word and published the email I sent him yesterday within my blog and Tweeted about it as well N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos Methinks after all my conversations and emails with minions working for Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan and the Ombudsperson Gregory Lick's their lawyers must have verified my statement 83 within my lawsuit on file in Federal Court (T-1557-15) by now N'esy Pas?
Stephen Stepic Because of DND and CF Ombudsman, reckless and wilful blindness actions a staff member killed himself in 2017. The DND harsh and inhumane people treatment (they subject a person to a series of fabricated internal disciplinary procedure/punishment; mental torture, inhuman and degrading treatment) leading many to commit suicide. These methods are always successful and no one can stop them in their hideous crimes against innocent human beings
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Stephen Stepic: Methinks everybody knows that some innocent folks who have been attacked don't give up but in fact enjoy arguing the bullies and their many cohorts Federal Court N'esy Pas?
Karl Bueckert "The office should report directly to Parliament and should be administratively de-coupled from DND"...YES!!!
What a cushy job moving from a high ranking military position into the ombudsman position...as if the job is a given to a chosen one... snuggling up to your buddy buddies still in uniform and keeping the ombudsman office out of reach of change! Anyone coming in with the intentions of change...that's an invitation for harassment. Although, I see issues on both sides here Gary! I am only going to refer to DND here.
DND, tsk tsk...some accountability will have to be forced with DND members and that means a new investigation. Keeping a dysfunctional office is to DND's advantage! DND should have zero powers over the Ombudsman office and not have any input on open positions.
Ombudsman office...clean them all out, every one of them...reassign far away from this office. Start new.
This has been going on since the inception of the Ombudsman office! Harper made it much worse during his tenure and the Old Boys Club took advantage! Time for change but not by another Harperite.
Parliament needs to address this separate from DND. I think Canadians would agree that the cost of an ombudsman office that is separated from DND is worth the money for the sake of military members needs but lets take those funds away (not out of) the military budget . The old boys club will then have to deal with their fear that a separate ombudsman office will erode military authority and leadership by addressing their own wrong doings! Enough of this deliberate undermining of what is right for our men and women who stand up for Canada instead of being used and abused only to be tossed to the curb with a royal handshake and a flip by VAC!
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Karl Bueckert: I Wholeheartedly Agree Sir
Jill Bennet The extremes of Kook Left and Kook Right are both bad extremes. I can see now the damage this can cause to our country's institutions. As much as I might have preferences for some elements of political platforms over others, it is a disservice to Canada to elect incompetent or overly ideologically partisan individuals or 'placeholders' to office. Have to scrutinize local candidates very closely-- check credentials, CV, character and intellect, view performance in town halls, interview them-- check their clarity of thought.
MPs are suppose to defer to deputy ministers, but if the MP or PM are incompetent, overly ideological, they can make some bad choices and arrogance can cause MPs to over-step where they really shouldn't. . .
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jill Bennet: "scrutinize local candidates very closely"
Whereas I am running again perhaps you should Google Fundy Royal Debate to review what I said four long year ago
Jill Bennet It sounds possible that Mr. Walbourne was an intelligent man going up against possible arrogance and ignorance in Mr.Sajjan? I hate to say it, but that's what it looks like to me.
E.g. I see the advocacy the Mr. Walbourne was trying to do re: the internal CF dispute resolution process, the "IC2M program"-- and the issue of protecting soldier condentiality from Snr. leadership, otherwise what's the point of the program? Why not go to Snr. leadership?
But some conflicts are more complicated, and it seems like a good idea to have alternative conflict resolution route for clearing up misunderstanding-- it could prevent OSIs from getting entrenched. Exceptions to confidentiality can exist, but there should be *informed consent* on what those exceptions are (e.g. Mental Health Act/serious risk, MH referral).
Anyway, Walbourne's point is about the fixing the process/procedure so soldiers can feel safe talk (without fear of serious repercussions to career), but NOT inserting himself into direct intervention between soldiers in dispute IN the IC2M program itself.
Was Saajan too dim to understand that difference? Was it language barrier? An educational barrier? An ego/arrogance/incompetence barrier? An overstepping his ministerial authority?
Exaggeration of role in A-stan-- which is a character flag-- symptom of problematic narcissism/self-delusion :-(
I honesty hate the partisan circus-- it's corrosive to institutions. It wears at our social cohesion, our social fabric. It damages professionalism and it can be bs *incompetent* people use to take the heat off themselves. I don't that's what Walbourne is about-- It looks to me like he was facing arrogance and ignorance in Mr. Sajjan. Maybe it's Mr. Sajjan who should be resigning (+ some others. . .)?
David Raymond Amos Reply to @Jill Bennet: "Was Saajan too dim to understand that difference?"
Methinks the porch lights are on but nobody is home N'esy Pas?
Jill Bennet Reply to @David Raymond Amos: It's hard to know anything or claim any certainty based on so little information. It's a minute couple of details-- it's not a full picture, just potential flags-- there's no way to really confirm any of it. There has to be other unseen variables, possibly not all them are neccesarily nefarious, but in service to our country.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jill Bennet: Trust that I can easily verify everything I state is true Methinks you should check out my lawsuit in Federal Court (T-1557-15) N'esy Pas?
Maggie Leard well all, when canada has a DCO general who dines constantly with the PMO staff....i guess ombudsman was conservative in beliefs.......
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Maggie Leard: ???
Murray Murray always happens when you challenge establishment. you lose.
David Evans
Reply to @murray murray: Not always...you have to stick to your guns and if you are right, you'll win.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @David Evans: Heres hoping that is true
David Raymond Amos Reply to @murray murray: Methinks you should explain to us Melanie Chapman's successful litigation N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos Surprise Surprise Surprise Perhaps in his retirement he will read my lawsuit now
Keith Laughton
Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Unlikely.
He seems more concerned with actual problems.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Keith Laughton: Methinks you must have read it by now Why else would you be so nasty N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @Keith Laughton: A little Deja Vu for a dude who acts like a polical lawyer
MP Maxime Bernier quits 'morally corrupt' Conservatives, plans to start new party Conservative leader says Bernier was more occupied with advancing his own profile than the needs of the party Catharine Tunney · CBC News · Posted: Aug 23, 2018 11:05 AM ET
3870 Comments
"Keith Laughton Reply to Reply to@Awistoyus Nahasthay
Are you suggesting that Mr Scheer should break Canadian Law?
Try looking at the Parliament of Canada Act, specifically section 49.2.
49.2 A member of a caucus may only be expelled from it if
(a) the caucus chair has received a written notice signed by at least 20% of the members of the caucus requesting that the member’s membership be reviewed; and
(b) the expulsion of the member is approved by secret ballot by a majority of all caucus members."
Given that this is the law of the land you may ask why Mr Singh and Mr Trudeau are not considered to be breaking the same law since they have expelled caucus members.
That is the result of Section 49.8 of the same law
"49.8 (1) At its first meeting following a general election, the caucus of every party that has a recognized membership of 12 or more persons in the House of Commons shall conduct a separate vote among the caucus members in respect of each of the following questions:
(a) whether sections 49.2 and 49.3 are to apply in respect of the caucus"
The Conservatives decided to place themselves under section 49.2 in this parliament, just like the law says.
Happy to have cleared up your confusion about the issue that is evident from your post.
Regards,
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @David Raymond Amos:
David Amos Reply to @Keith Laughton Enlightening but methinks a strong leader could whip up such a thing in a heartbeat. The liberal Bill Casey would attest to that N'esy Pas?
Lawrence Wilson Mr. Walbourne was appointed by Mr. Harper. He seems to have politicized his office by using the media to try to make the Liberals look bad. Like the other Conservative appointee, Mr. Norman, he seems to have had greater allegiance to the Conservative Party than to the current government. This article has given him a last chance to show his negativity towards the government. News articles use to reveal both sides of a story. This one only reveals the side of the disgruntled, former employee. Little substance. Much innuendo. Why did Mr. Walbourne decide to speak out during the election?
Keith Laughton
Reply to @Lawrence Wilson: It appears that you don't actually read articles since you claim that VAdm Norman was a Harper appointee. He was promoted in rank by every government since he joined during the time of Pierre Elliot Trudeau. That included his appointment as VCDS by Justin Trudeau.
And the RCMP didn't bother to talk to VAdm Norman, or seek any evidence, other than from the Liberal Cabinet and their support staff, to test their theory.
Now as to Mr Walbourne, in your own post you present a one-sided view about Federal Court Documents, and indulge in innuendo with no facts, as to his partisan nature, almost like they were scripted by Ms Telford.
It does seem that you don't believe that the Pubic Service is non-partisan. That could explain why the two Clerks of the Privy Council appointed by Mr Trudeau have been so diligent about preventing RCMP investigators, and the Trudeau appointed Ethics Commissioner, from gaining access to Government information when the subject is Mr Trudeau or his cabinet.
Regards,
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Keith Laughton: Methinks I have discovered why who have begun dogging me since I became a confirmed candidate running against your lawyer buddy Rob Moore again Perhaps you should Google Admiral Norman and my name N'esy Pas?
BTW I was accepted into RMC in 1970 without having to write my High School finals I did go because I did not like the snobby officer interviewing me. You strike me as that type of dude
David Raymond Amos
Content disabled
Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Clearly all your comments remain while many of mine continue to go "Poof' to this very day EH?
John Smith Passive aggressiveness makes me want to quit my job too. My experience has been that these type of leaders either get fired or promoted in a short amount of time.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @John Smith: Methinks all politicians and their minions are well aware of Murphy's Law N'esy Pas?
Jerry Jordan Sajjan is a good representative of Trudeau's liberals ….my way or the highway.....no wonder there is so much bullying in Canada.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Jerry Jordan: Methinks its a dog eat dog world and Canada is no different N'esy Pas?
Stephen White He did the job right, one might know that this would happen to him...
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Stephen White: Perhaps
Wayne Ouellette Liberals have an interesting way of confronting challengers. They get fired or are forced to quit.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Wayne Ouellette: YUP
David Harrington
No surprise here. More of the Trudeau clown act. Canada is an international laughingstock
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @David Harrington: Welcome to the Circus
Rashid Mohamad Sounds like it was a case of constructive dismissal....which is illegal. Should not the Minister be held accountable?
Mo Bennett
Reply to @Jim Henry: then a lot of people have short memories and need to make a trip to Buford's milliner for a fitting.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @mo bennett: YO MO Methinks you resemble your own remark N'esy Pas?
Mo Bennett there were politicians involved, so of course it was a mess.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @mo bennett: YO MO I resemble that remark Check statement 83 of my lawsuit
Bort Smith
The Liberals and DND top officials....defaming and muzzeling people who tell the truth instead of making the brass and the Liberals look good??
I'm sooooo shocked.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Bort Smith: Methinks the DND should check my work N'esy Pas?
Keith Laughton
Reply to @David Raymond Amos: No.
David Raymond Amos Reply to @Keith Laughton: Methinks you are still dogging me for some strange political reason since I became a confirmed candidate in Fundy Royal Perhaps you have some stake in Veterans affairs and their pensions etc N'esy Pas?
Ewa Adams The federal government was always like this: petty, complacent, ***-kissing and vicious...left it with gusto :-)
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Ewa Adams: Mais oui
Doug Gray This should also relate to the sexual harassment within the military. The forum was open to comments with the RCMP enquire, we heard there were some 2000 complaints of harassment and no report on how many were founded, but 200,000 million was set aside. The Military sexual harassment no details or comments allowed but we hear the figure of 900,000 million being mentioned but no number of complaints. Why the vast difference in the way they are handled and why doesn’t the public get details. Perhaps our media has slipped up or overlooked the issue?
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Doug Gray: Methinks everything political always boils down to our taxpayer funds paying off somebody for governmental wrongs N'esy Pas?
Keith Laughton
Reply to @David Raymond Amos: Is that why you clam to be on the ballot this year. So that you can collect?
Regards
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Keith Laughton: Methinks you don't have the first clue as to what you are talking about N'esy Pas?
David Raymond Amos Reply to @Keith Laughton: Methinks if anybody bothered to notice your dogging of me today it should be a small wonder that I hold you in no regard at all N'esy Pas?
Myles Grant This looks like political interference from the defence minister in order to cover up the bad job the Liberals are doing in transitioning veterans to civilian life. Totally political. This is Harjit Sajjans SNC Lavalin.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Myles Grant: YUP
Kevan Cleverbridge This is par for the course for the Trudeau Liberals. If they don't get their own way they'll defame or disgrace you,just ask Jodi,Jane,Vice Admiral Norman and a whole host of others. Shameful.
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Kevan Cleverbridge: Methinks everybody knows the Tag Team of Jody and Jane and their buddy Admiral Norman ain't telling the whole truth N'esy Pas?
David Conway The Ombudsman position, no matter what aspect of governing it's to cover, is a nightmare for who ever holds the position.
Carson Brook
Reply to @David Conway: actually that's so often not accurate..... . look at the CBC ombuds office - rests easy about ignoring citizen concerns about quality of journalism and fact basing in political news room Or maybe that's what you mean; the path to survival, not to service
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Carson Brook: YUP
David Raymond Amos
Reply to @Carson Brook: FYI I quoted your words in Twitter just now and blogged them as well
---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:39:29 -0300 Subject: Fwd: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam To: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Byrne Furlong Press Secretary Office of the Minister of National Defence 613-996-3100
Media Relations Department of National Defence 613-996-2353 mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
Mr. Stoffer served as a Member of Parliament for the riding of Sackville-Eastern Shore from 1997 to 2015. During 2011-2015, he served as the Official Opposition Critic for Veterans Affairs.
During this time, Mr. Stoffer was honoured with a variety of awards from the environmental, military, provincial and federal communities. He was named Canada’s Parliamentarian of the year 2013, and he received the Veterans Ombudsman award. Mr Stoffer has been knighted into the Order of St. George and has also been knighted by the King of the Netherlands into the Order of Orange Nassau.
He is currently volunteering for a variety of veteran organizations. He is also host to a radio show called “Hour of Heroes in Nova Scotia” on Community Radio, Radio Station 97-5 CIOE-FM, the Voice of the East Coast Music.
Colonel-Maître® Michel William Drapeau SENIOR COUNSEL (613) 236-2657 x200 Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:38:01 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM / SPAM SUSPECT] A little Deja Vu for JONATHAN.VANCE et al To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Good day,
Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email has not been forwarded.
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca > Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would > drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy > Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/ > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Good day, > > Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email > has not been forwarded. > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:35 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta > Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate > speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code > N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ??? > To: motomaniac333@gmail.com > > I will be out of the office until 23 February 2016. I am unable to > monitor my e-mail during this time. For urgent matters, please contact > my Chief of Staff, BGen Tammy Harris (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), or > my EA, Maj Cedric Aspirault (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
> or call 613-957-4222. > > Thank you > > ------------------- > > Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de > Vancouver Granville. > > Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre > courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de > correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de > votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. > > Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, > veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, > votre adresse et votre code postal. > > Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de > la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la > d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du > Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la > Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ? > mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222. > > Merci > > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca> > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:15 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and > Province of Nova Scotia > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> > > Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la > S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile. > En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance > adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un > retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre > message sera examin? avec attention. > Merci! > L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle > S?curit? publique Canada > ********* > > Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of > Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness. > Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence > addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in > processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be > carefully reviewed. > Thank you! > Ministerial Correspondence Unit > Public Safety Canada > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:11 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and > Province of Nova Scotia > To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com > > Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member > of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. > > This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. > Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there > may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your > message will be carefully reviewed. > > To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within > the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. > > Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of > Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the > Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future > correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write > directly to the Department of Justice at > mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice.gc.ca> or call 613-957-4222. > > Thank you > > ------------------- > > Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de > Vancouver Granville. > > Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre > courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de > correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de > votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. > > Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, > veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, > votre adresse et votre code postal. > > Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de > la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la > d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du > Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la > Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ? > mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222. > > Merci > > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)" > <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca> > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:17 +0000 > Subject: RE: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> > > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your > comments. > > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos > commentaires. > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:16 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and > Province of Nova Scotia > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> > > Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. > > If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical > support, please contact our Customer Service department at > 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com > > If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to > publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com> > > Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com > > This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and > press releases. > > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> > Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:53:03 -0400 > Subject: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia > To: wrscott@nbpower.com, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, > "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" > <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca>, > "rick.doucet"<rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Sollows, David (ERD/DER)" > <david.sollows@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, > "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca, > "Bill.Fraser"<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "John.Ames"<John.Ames@gnb.ca>, > gerry.lowe@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, > michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "art.odonnell"<art.odonnell@nb.aibn.com>, > "jake.stewart"<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, mike.holland@gnb.ca, votejohnw > <votejohnw@gmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, > greg.thompson2@gnb.ca, jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca, > jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca, > "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca, > rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy" > <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, wharrison > <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>, > "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca>, > "clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, > "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, > "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" > <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, > JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca, > Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca, Newsroom > <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news > <news@dailygleaner.com> > Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>, motomaniac333 > <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca, > Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "McGrath, Stephen T"<Stephen.McGrath@novascotia.ca> > Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:40:22 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: Does anyone recall the email entitled "So > Stephen McGrath if not you then just exactly who sent me this latest > email from your office?" > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Thanks for your message, however I am no longer at the Department of > Justice, and this email account is not being monitored. > > Please contact Kim Fleming at Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca (phone > 902-424-4023), or Vicky Zinck at Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca (phone > 902-424-4390). Kim and Vicky will be able to redirect you. > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca> > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000 > Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia > To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Mr. Amos, > We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of > Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the > Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province > of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim > against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney > General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will > not be responding to further emails on this matter. > > Department of Justice > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400 > Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just > called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit > against Nova Scotia > To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca, Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, > Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca > Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/NSDeputies.html > > https://novascotia.ca/exec_council/LLLangley-bio.html > > Laura Lee Langley > 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor > One Government Place > Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5 > Phone: (902) 424-8940 > Fax: (902) 424-0667 > Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca > > https://novascotia.ca/just/deputy.asp > > Karen Hudson Q.C. > 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor > Joseph Howe Building > Halifax, NS B3J 3J9 > Phone: (902) 424-4223 > Fax: (902) 424-0510 > Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca > > https://novascotia.ca/sns/ceo.asp > > Joanne Munro: > 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South > Maritime Centre > Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5 > Phone: (902) 424-4089 > Fax: (902) 424-5510 > Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca > > If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I > suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown > Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached > to you and your Premier etc. > > Veritas Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 > Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > To: coi@gnb.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Good Day Sir > > After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed > to speak to one of your staff for the first time > > Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who > answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt > at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker > Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. > > These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I > suggested that you study closely. > > This is the docket in Federal Court > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T > > These are digital recordings of the last three hearings > > Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug > > January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015 > > April 3rd, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing > > > This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All > > > The only hearing thus far > > May 24th, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown > > > This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity > > Date: 20151223 > > Docket: T-1557-15 > > Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 > > PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell > > BETWEEN: > > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS > > Plaintiff > > and > > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN > > Defendant > > ORDER > > (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on > December 14, 2015) > > The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to > the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November > 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim > in its entirety. > > At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a > letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then > capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian > Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, > (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter > he stated: > > As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the > work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. > You are your brother’s keeper. > > Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former > colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to > expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of > people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses > or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to > me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime > Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former > Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of > Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; > former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former > Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff > Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court > of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired > Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted > Police. > > In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my > personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many > potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am > of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I > hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in > Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, > [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding > allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has > requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. > > > AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of > the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There > is no order as to costs. > > “B. Richard Bell” > Judge > > > Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment > already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent > to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. > > I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court > Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the > bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my > lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? > > "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most > > http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html > > 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over > five years after he began his bragging: > > January 13, 2015 > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate > > December 8, 2014 > Why Canada Stood Tall! > > Friday, October 3, 2014 > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And > Stupid Justin Trudeau? > > > Vertias Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of > the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have > had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical. > Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me. > > Subject: > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 > From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca > To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > > January 30, 2007 > > WITHOUT PREJUDICE > > Mr. David Amos > > Dear Mr. Amos: > > This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, > 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. > > Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have > taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve > Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. > > Sincerely, > > Honourable Michael B. Murphy > Minister of Health > > CM/cb > > > Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: > > Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 > From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, > nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, > motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca, > Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has > forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not > > Dear Mr. Amos, > > Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off > over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I > was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. > > As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position > is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process > testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the > Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these > services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this > instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. > > As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false > imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear > that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada > the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment > and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. > > It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on > December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. > > Sincerely, > > Warren McBeath, Cpl. > GRC Caledonia RCMP > Traffic Services NCO > Ph: (506) 387-2222 > Fax: (506) 387-4622 > E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > > > http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139 > > http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc > > > FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 > Senator Arlen Specter > United States Senate > Committee on the Judiciary > 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building > Washington, DC 20510 > > Dear Mr. Specter: > > I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man > named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters > raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that > these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in > contact > with you about this previously. > > Very truly yours, > Barry A. Bachrach > Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 > Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 > Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com > > > > Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > Office of the Integrity Commissioner > Edgecombe House, 736 King Street > Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 > tel.: 506-457-7890 > fax: 506-444-5224 > e-mail:coi@gnb.ca > > Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C. > Integrity Commissioner > > Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a > native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie) > Deschênes. They have two sons. > > He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from > 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and > University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law > Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the > Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in > private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation > as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and > Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council > and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission. > He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac. > > In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New > Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000. > > On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of > Canada. > > While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed > President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson > of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New > Brunswick for the 2015 federal election. > > He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016 > and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December > 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related > to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he > supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’ > Registration Act. > > As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently > held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner. > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is> > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000 > Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable > parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have > Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and > that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends > to be.. > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received > > Kveðja / Best regards > Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is> > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000 > Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable > parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have > Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and > that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends > to be.. > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received. > > Kveðja / Best regards > Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca> > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000 > Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby > Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't > hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity > now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. > Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed, > and a response will be forthcoming. > Once again, thank you for taking the time to write. > > Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. > Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné > et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée. > Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire. > > Sincerely, / Sincèrement, > Mallory Fowler > Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance > Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is> > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000 > Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby > Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't > hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity > now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received > > Kveðja / Best regards > Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is> > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000 > Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby > Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't > hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity > now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?? > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received. > > Kveðja / Best regards > Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior > > > For the public record I knew Birgitta was no better than the people > she bitches about when she refused to discuss the QSLS blog with me > while she was in Canada making her rounds in the Canadain media in > January of 2011. > > > This is the docket > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T > > These are digital recordings of the last two hearings > > Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug > > Jan 11th https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015 > > This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again > > Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local > Campaign, Rogers TV > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE > > http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/fundy-royal-riding-profile-1.3274276 > > Veritas Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400 > Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the > 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the > Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain > this lawsuit to you real slow. > To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>, > "daniel.mchardie"<daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca, > info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca, > matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca, > tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Frank.McKenna" > <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca, > "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, > "dominic.leblanc.a1"<dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca>, oldmaison > <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>, > "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay" > <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca> > > > > FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most > > > http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html > > 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over > five years after he began his bragging: > > January 13, 2015 > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate > > December 8, 2014 > Why Canada Stood Tall! > > Friday, October 3, 2014 > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And > Stupid Justin Trudeau > > Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide > behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. > > When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien > actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign > in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to > the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were > involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were > significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth > of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for > operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” > Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. > The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not > deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a > Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to > redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was > less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But > alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s > then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s > incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, > professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle > Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway > campaign of 2006. > > What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then > Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the > Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, > support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. > > What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling > chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of > less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners > as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a > deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. > > The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have > the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. > That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by > constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is > remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of > non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government > regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this > instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a > limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. > > President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror > attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” > Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, > and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The > initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and > essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An > ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear > and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,” > or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of > terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states > “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of > Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an > ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the > Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan. > > One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty > was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the > amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time > denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time > self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of > “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the > G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious > behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister > Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully > cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits > are not. > > Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal > mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the > world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy” > David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security > and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can > and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing > “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war > criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending > tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.” > > In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau > “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and > successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing, > marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian > military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern > equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are > antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five > years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that > won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer. > > My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My > Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin > Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not > served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social > democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and > other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet > these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to > other nations, and then criticize them for doing so. > > Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security, > and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before > shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world. > > Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now > > From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca > Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400 > Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and > the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still > alive > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received > your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply > to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement. > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300 > Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the > War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive > To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil, > Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca, > william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>, > dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca, > milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca, > sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari > <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, > susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com, > eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net > Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin" > <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower > <whistleblower@ctv.ca> > > I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David > Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's > Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on > CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To > be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested > that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise > if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else > about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your > old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English > never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is > interesting though > > http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/ > > http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-launch.html > > Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read > this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about > Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad > Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me. > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right > > The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a > shy political animal > > Veritas Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > Enjoy Mr Weston > http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-wikileaks.html > > "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military > brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he > says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping > to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command, > including a Canadian general. > > That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff, > who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000 > U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was > also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped > prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait." > > http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html > > "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there > being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends" > demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American > "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying > into the US policy. > > At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my > colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning > in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would > report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was > never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there > were deployed WMD. > > Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and > invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were > concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation > (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned > about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at > that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil > authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy. > > There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to > its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary > to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that > folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated > upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions > are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien > and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of > Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them > correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the > George W Bush administration was onerous > > American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian > military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian > naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations > in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan > thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi > operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian > lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which > ....not necessarily in that order. " > > You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John > Adams? of the CSE within the DND? > > http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx >
Former military ombudsman claims DND vendetta drove him into retirement
'There comes a point ... when you have to consider whether I could do any further good." - Gary Walbourne
Then-Canadian Forces ombudsman Gary Walbourne is shown at a Senate veterans affairs committee in Ottawa on May 4. (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)
The Department of National Defence conducted a closed-door, wide-ranging review of complaints of mismanagement, nepotism and misuse of public funds in the Office of the Canadian Forces ombudsman last year, CBC News has learned.
The review was instrumental in the early retirement of former watchdog Gary Walbourne, according to recently released Federal Court documents.
In an interview with CBC News, Walbourne said the internal review was a flawed, politically-motivated inquiry intended to isolate and silence him. He also said the process gained significant traction only after a major, private falling out between him and Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan.
Walbourne refused to disclose the substance of his disagreement with the minister in the late winter of 2018, but said it was serious enough that Sajjan refused to speak or even meet with him for the remainder of his tenure.
"It was a stiff conversation between adults that got a little heated," he said. "Going into detail may breach some of the oaths I've taken as Order in Council appointee."
Walbourne said that after his clash with Sajjan — which took place in a private meeting on March 1, 2018 in the minister's Parliament Hill office — he quickly found himself out of the loop.
"Every meeting from that meeting forward was cancelled. There were dozens of them that were set and cancelled over a period of time," he said. "The authorities granted to the ombudsman by the deputy minister's office were altered, changed, truncated, and it just went on and on."
The conflict, he confirmed, led to him asking for early retirement.
"For about the last eight or 10 months I was in office, I sat there without financial or human resource authorities signed off by the deputy minister," Walbourne said.
"So when you take away the tools that allow you to do the job, you can't get an audience with the minister to talk about subjects that are of importance ... So there comes a point in time when you have to consider whether I could do any further good."
Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan. (The Canadian Press)
Documents, obtained by CBC News through both the Federal Court and independent sources, corroborate Walbourne's statements about the meeting date and the limits placed on his powers.
The apparent falling out with Sajjan was also the culmination of rising friction between the hard-charging, blunt-spoken ombudsman and the defence department, which had grown increasingly irritated with his repeated public criticisms on a number of topics.
The tension in the relationship spilled out into the public in early 2017, when Walbourne complained of "insidious" behind-the-scene attacks by DND officials. The relationship was so sour, according to a report at the time by The Canadian Press, that Sajjan wrote to the ombudsman in an attempt to smooth things over.
Walbourne's persistent complaints before parliamentary committees — particularly about the problems of transition to civilian life experienced by military members — were greeted with visible irritation by both military and civilian defence officials.
No answers from Sajjan
Sajjan refused to answer questions about Walbourne's allegations and the revelations in the Federal Court records.
The minister's office released a written statement that did not address the issues and said only that he valued "the substantive input, mandate and independence" of the ombudsman's office.
"I am committed to maintaining a positive and productive working relationship with the Ombudsperson and have encouraged him to come to me should he be facing issues in carrying out his mandate," the statement said. "I will continue to value the work being done by the Office of the Ombudsperson and look forward to continuing to work with the current Ombudsman."
Gregory Lick was named to replace Walbourne in November of last year.
The review of Walbourne and three other staff members, according to Federal Court records, was carried out by the defence department's assistant deputy minister of review services.
Probe launched after staffer suicide
It was initiated in response to an eight-page written complaint by an investigator on the ombudsman's team after another long-time staffer killed himself in April 2017.
The former ombudsman was accused under the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act of misuse of public funds, inappropriate hiring practices and promotion without competition, failure to accommodate a mental health disability in relation to the death of his staff member, and failure to create a safe and healthy workplace.
Four of the five complaints against Walbourne were deemed "founded."
The allegation of misuse of public funds, involving the hiring of a former journalist to write reports for the office, was thrown out.
Walbourne challenges the remaining findings and denied any wrongdoing.
He said that one of the complaints — of inappropriate hiring — is blatantly false because, while he knew one of the eight applicants for the job in question, he had recused himself from the selection process.
In fact, the staff member, hired in 2014, was vetted by a multi-departmental committee that included an acting assistant deputy minister, a director general from the Public Service Commission and a Department of National Defence human resources executive, according to documents (separate from the court filing) obtained by CBC News.
The defence department was unable to explain how that information was not taken into account in the findings of the investigation against Walbourne.
A former ombudsman's staff member, who left before the complaints were filed, said the watchdog routinely faced pushback from long-time members of the team when he tried to overhaul the office after he took over in 2014.
"Gary sought to professionalize the investigation teams with mandatory training and the standardization of the way systemic investigations were handled, and how the reports were written," said retired lieutenant-colonel Jamie Robertson.
"This rankled some members of the investigations team — the very same members who were also discontented with the previous ombudsman."
'No-nonsense, Newfoundlander-direct'
The revamp was a priority following a scathing report by the auditor general, who in 2015 criticized the previous military ombudsman, retired major-general Pierre Daigle, over a host of spending and hiring decisions.
Walbourne's approach "was always no-nonsense, Newfoundlander-direct," and that ruffled feathers, said Robertson.
Other staff members under Walbourne faced similar but separate complaints of misconduct. Melanie Chapman, Nadine Parker and Robyn Hynes were also faulted by the defence department review.
Chapman, the ombudsman's director of investigations, contested the findings against her. She took her case to Federal Court, saying the independent investigators and senior defence officials who sat in judgment never told her the substance of the complaints and denied her the opportunity to properly defend herself.
A Federal Court judge ruled her treatment by defence officials was unreasonable.
"She was not given procedural fairness in the investigation process," Judge Russel Zinn wrote in a July 23 ruling.
"She was not clearly apprised on the alleged wrongdoing, and she was not informed what evidence had been gathered by the investigator. In short, she was not given a meaningful right to be heard or given the opportunity to know the case against her at any stage of this process."
The judge ordered the department to re-examine her case.
'Collateral damage'
Walbourne said he believes the complaints against him and the rest of the staff were handled in the same arbitrary manner.
The investigation, which was conducted by an outside agency before being handed to the head of the defence department's review services, was formally launched in the fall of 2017.
Walbourne said he believes officials seized upon the complaints and made them part of a systematic campaign to discredit his office within the federal government after a series of hard-hitting reports on the transition issues facing members of the military.
Gary Walbourne at work: "The authorities granted to the ombudsman by the deputy minister's office were altered, changed, truncated, and it just went on and on." (Waubgeshig Rice/CBC)
"I do believe the object of the investigation was me, but this investigation was not just about me," he told CBC News. "There were other members of my staff who I consider to be collateral damage."
The former ombudsman made his concerns about the investigation known to Sajjan when he decided to retire ahead of schedule.
"The process has been flawed from the beginning and activity throughout has been suspicious," he wrote in his March 2, 2018 resignation letter, which was obtained by CBC News. "The names of those accused have been released and are being shared across the environment. A direct attempt to discredit and defame."
Court records filed in connection with the Chapman case make reference to a whisper campaign and show a senior staffer in deputy minister Jody Thomas' office acknowledged discussing the investigation of the ombudsman and his staff with at least nine senior defence bureaucrats.
The revelation, according to the court papers, cost Chapman a shot at the leadership of the military's newly created sexual assault response centre.
The court documents also spell out how the defence department altered and limited the financial and human resources powers of the ombudsman while Walbourne was still in charge.
Robertson said that, throughout his time serving two ombudsmen, he saw both examples of extraordinary cooperation and closed-door bureaucratic rebukes.
It is time for change, he said.
"To be an effective ombudsman you are unlikely to win a popularity contest with the organization you are overseeing," said Robertson.
"Each and every (CAF) ombudsman since 1998 has strongly recommended that the office should report directly to Parliament and should be administratively de-coupled from DND as this gives the department de facto control over financing, [human resources] and other elements that can impact the day to day functioning of the office."
Murray Brewster is senior defence writer for CBC News, based in Ottawa. He has covered the Canadian military and foreign policy from Parliament Hill for over a decade. Among other assignments, he spent a total of 15 months on the ground covering the Afghan war for The Canadian Press. Prior to that, he covered defence issues and politics for CP in Nova Scotia for 11 years and was bureau chief for Standard Broadcast News in Ottawa.
