https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @SeanFineGlobe
Methinks that although you don't return calls or answer emails this tweet proves that you can trust the fact that you are not only one to notice that @JustinTrudeau politically vets his Judges just like @stephenharper did N'esy Pas ?
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/03/methinks-snobby-retired-judge-in-fat.html
#cdnpoli#nbpoli
Sean FineVerified account @SeanFineGlobe
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fine, Sean"<SFine@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 23:55:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Faisal Khan Suri would not listen to me so perhaps his political friends or the cops can explain my concerns
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
?I am in a place far removed from reality, from June 1 to June 8. On my return, I promise to be kinder.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fine, Sean"<SFine@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 15:39:12 -0400
Subject: Out of Office: Yo Loik Amis So much for the Integrity of your friends and associates in the legal business N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Back in August . . . zzzz...
http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/en/text/96
The Politics of Judicial Appointments, part I
Posted on Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:00:00 +0000
The federal government has been criticized for allegedly picking
judges based on political considerations and in a non-transparent
manner. In the first part of a two-part episode on the federal
judicial appointment process, we look into the scope of the
government’s discretion in naming judges and the role that ideology or
partisanship might play in the process. We speak with Sean Fine,
justice reporter at the Globe and Mail; Professor Robert Leckey of
McGill’s Faculty of Law; and David Gourdeau, a former commissioner for
federal judicial affairs.
The Politics of Judicial Appointments, part II
Posted on Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:30:00 +0000
The former federal government has been criticized for allegedly
picking judges based on political considerations and in a
non-transparent manner. In the second part of a two-part episode on
the federal judicial appointment process, we look into whether the
current process needs to be reformed and, if it does, how. We speak
with Leonid Sirota, J.S.D. Candidate at the New York University School
of Law and Professor Rosemary Cairns Way from the University of
Ottawa’s Faculty of Law.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-trudeau-appoints-first-female-chief-justice-1.5162351
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/more-than-half-of-liberals-appointed-judges-are-women/article34964546/
Sean Fine
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Replying to @SeanFineGlobe
Methinks that although you don't return calls or answer emails this tweet proves that you can trust the fact that you are not only one to notice that @JustinTrudeau politically vets his Judges just like @stephenharper did N'esy Pas ?
http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/03/methinks-snobby-retired-judge-in-fat.html
Sean FineVerified account @SeanFineGlobe
More inside info on Libs' judicial appointment process from my colleagues Leblanc and Cardoso: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-pmos-background-checks-on-potential-judges-reveal-more-than-a-decade/ …#cdnlaw
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fine, Sean"<SFine@globeandmail.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2019 23:55:10 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Faisal Khan Suri would not listen to me so perhaps his political friends or the cops can explain my concerns
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
?I am in a place far removed from reality, from June 1 to June 8. On my return, I promise to be kinder.
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Fine, Sean"<SFine@globeandmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 15:39:12 -0400
Subject: Out of Office: Yo Loik Amis So much for the Integrity of your friends and associates in the legal business N'esy Pas?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Back in August . . . zzzz...
http://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/en/text/96
The Politics of Judicial Appointments, part I
Posted on Wed, 14 Oct 2015 11:00:00 +0000
The federal government has been criticized for allegedly picking
judges based on political considerations and in a non-transparent
manner. In the first part of a two-part episode on the federal
judicial appointment process, we look into the scope of the
government’s discretion in naming judges and the role that ideology or
partisanship might play in the process. We speak with Sean Fine,
justice reporter at the Globe and Mail; Professor Robert Leckey of
McGill’s Faculty of Law; and David Gourdeau, a former commissioner for
federal judicial affairs.
The Politics of Judicial Appointments, part II
Posted on Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:30:00 +0000
The former federal government has been criticized for allegedly
picking judges based on political considerations and in a
non-transparent manner. In the second part of a two-part episode on
the federal judicial appointment process, we look into whether the
current process needs to be reformed and, if it does, how. We speak
with Leonid Sirota, J.S.D. Candidate at the New York University School
of Law and Professor Rosemary Cairns Way from the University of
Ottawa’s Faculty of Law.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/nb-trudeau-appoints-first-female-chief-justice-1.5162351
PM Justin Trudeau appoints 1st female Chief Justice of N.B.'s Court of Queen's Bench
Tracey K. DeWare is among 4 new judges appointed to Court of Queen's Bench on Tuesday
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has appointed New Brunswick's first female Chief Justice to the Court of Queen's Bench.
Tracey K. DeWare was a judge of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick for seven years and practised law in Moncton for 18 years.
Her appointment as chief justice comes after the retirement of Justice David Smith in March.
DeWare is fluently bilingual and during her time as a judge of the Court of Queen's Bench, she spent two years in Woodstock providing bilingual judicial services to the jurisdictions of Woodstock and Fredericton. In July 2016, DeWare was transferred to the jurisdiction of Moncton.
Federal Justice Minister David Lametti also appointed three people as judges of New Brunswick's Court of Queen's Bench.
Christa Bourque, a partner at McInnes Cooper in Moncton, will fill the vacancy in Moncton created by DeWare's appointment. She will serve in the family division.
Arthur T. Doyle, a partner at Cox & Palmer in Saint John, will replace Justice W.T. Grant, who had elected to become a supernumerary judge in October 2018. He will serve in the trial division.
Robert M. Dysart, a partner at Stewart McKelvey in Moncton, will replace Justice S. McNally, who retired in April. He will also serve in the trial division.
Tracey K. DeWare was a judge of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick for seven years and practised law in Moncton for 18 years.
Her appointment as chief justice comes after the retirement of Justice David Smith in March.
DeWare is fluently bilingual and during her time as a judge of the Court of Queen's Bench, she spent two years in Woodstock providing bilingual judicial services to the jurisdictions of Woodstock and Fredericton. In July 2016, DeWare was transferred to the jurisdiction of Moncton.
Federal Justice Minister David Lametti also appointed three people as judges of New Brunswick's Court of Queen's Bench.
Christa Bourque, a partner at McInnes Cooper in Moncton, will fill the vacancy in Moncton created by DeWare's appointment. She will serve in the family division.
Arthur T. Doyle, a partner at Cox & Palmer in Saint John, will replace Justice W.T. Grant, who had elected to become a supernumerary judge in October 2018. He will serve in the trial division.
Robert M. Dysart, a partner at Stewart McKelvey in Moncton, will replace Justice S. McNally, who retired in April. He will also serve in the trial division.
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/more-than-half-of-liberals-appointed-judges-are-women/article34964546/
Liberals reshape judicial bench with appointments of women
Sean Fine
The Liberal government is reshaping the bench, appointing a substantial majority of women, even though they make up a minority of applicants. The approach is winning praise from some in the legal community, while sparking concern about "quotas" from others.
A year and a half after taking office, the government has appointed 56 judges, of whom 33 are women – 59 per cent. Yet women make up only 42 per cent of the 795 people who have applied to be judges since the Liberals put in place a new appointment process in October.
Making federal institutions more reflective of Canadian diversity has been a theme of the Liberal government. Its cabinet has an equal number of men and women, and it announced a plan last week to ensure more women and minorities are named to federally funded research chair positions at universities.
Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould says a more diverse bench will build the public's confidence in the judiciary. "We are beginning to demonstrate how it is possible to have a bench that truly reflects the country we live in," she said in an e-mail to The Globe and Mail.
But some in the legal community question the government's commitment to the merit principle in appointing judges to federally appointed courts, which includes the superior courts of provinces, the Federal Court and Tax Court.
"I'm not really in favour of a quota system – those are alarming discrepancies," Brenda Noble, a veteran family lawyer in Saint John, said in an interview, referring to the gap between female appointees and applicants. "You want to have the best people in the job."
Ian Holloway, the University of Calgary's law dean, said it is hard to fault the government for increasing the proportion of women judges. Even so, he said he worries the government is putting too much emphasis on gender.
"In the old days, it was offensive that people got judgeships just because they were Liberals or Tories. That helped breed contempt for the judiciary. What we don't want to do is replicate that in a different form."
But others say the government is doing the right thing.
Brenda Hildebrandt, a Saskatoon lawyer and governing member of the Saskatchewan Law Society, was pleased. "Do I think it's a good thing women are more represented on the bench? Yes, I do, and I would hope that those are qualified candidates and that the fact that they're women is just one consideration, albeit important."
Rosemary Cairns Way, a University of Ottawa law professor who has studied diversity on federally appointed courts, supports the government's move as a way of achieving gender parity. "When there is no shortage of meritorious candidates, it seems to me the government can legitimately choose judges who, in addition to being independently qualified, will fulfill other institutional goals such as a more diverse and gender-balanced bench."
When the Liberals took office, 35 per cent of the federal judiciary (full-time and semi-retired) were women, according to the Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs. Given a similar time frame to the Conservatives – a decade in office – the Liberals would ultimately put women in the majority among the full-time federal judiciary if they maintain the current ratio of appointments. The previous government appointed more than 600 full-time federal judges, 30 per cent of them women; women also made up 30 per cent of applicants during the Conservatives' years in office.
The government's emphasis on creating a bench more reflective of Canada's diversity does not extend quite as much to racial minorities as it does to women. However, there are at least seven visible minorities among the new appointees – two of Indigenous ancestry, three of South Asian background, one Japanese-Canadian and one Chinese-Canadian.
The Liberals have authorized the judicial-affairs commissioner to collect, for the first time, data on race, Indigenous status, gender identity, sexual orientation and physical disability of applicants and appointees. But the office would not release those numbers to The Globe and Mail for this story, saying it is still preparing the data and it intends to publish them soon.
The Globe asked Ms. Wilson-Raybould whether she has a numerical target for the appointment of women to the federal judiciary. She replied that the government appoints judges based on merit and the needs of the court. "In assessing merit, I do not discriminate against applicants based on their gender, ethnic or cultural background," she said in an e-mail.
She acknowledged that the pace of racial-minority appointments is lagging and suggested the problem is a lack of minorities in the legal profession.
"We know that more needs to be done to increase the number of visible minorities in our law schools. As that happens, the face of the profession will change and evolve to better reflect the rest of the population."
Rob Nicholson, a former Conservative justice minister, and the party's current justice critic, said his chief concern is that qualified people be appointed. "If it's 55-per-cent women and 45-per-cent men, as long as we get qualified people for this," he said.