From: magicJack
Subject: New VM (2) - 0:26 minutes in your magicJack mailbox from 9026287810
To: "DAVID AMOS"
Date: Friday, May 11, 2018, 8:32 PM
Dear magicJack User:
You received a new 0:26 minutes voicemail message, on
Friday, May 11, 2018 at 08:32:48 PM in mailbox 9028000369
from 9026287810.
http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/
One thing is certain, Dumville says he will not resign his seat, vowing to use his time in the legislature in the spring to challenge the premier on questions of character and ethics.
His biggest concern is that his constituents could suffer now that he is no longer in government and left on poor terms.
Dumville admits the last week has been a rollercoaster of emotions.
“I don’t know what’s going to happen. This may be the end of my political career or it could be the beginning of my political career. Only time will tell.”
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 08:14:23 -0400
Subject: For the record Mr Dumville is the only person to call me back
from PEI since 2007
To: sfdumville@assembly.pe.ca, info@pronpei.vote, sthorne@gov.pe.ca,
psmith@charlottetown.ca, jbrown@gov.pe.ca, samyers@assembly.pe.ca,
omcrane@assembly.pe.ca, jsjaylward@assembly.pe.ca,
crlavie@assembly.pe.ca, twright@theguardian.pe.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
"andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, Hebell@assembly.pe.ca,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> ,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Jack.Keir"<Jack.Keir@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Hannah Bell <Hebell@assembly.pe.ca>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 11:16:00 -0300
Subject: Re: Fwd: Hey folks remember the emails I sent in in 2014 when Ghiz quit?
If not scroll down
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. As I was elected in November 2017 I did not
receive emails from 2014. I have scrolled through your mail and am not
clear what you are asking, however. I understand you have also called
the office - please note that we are happy to hear from the public but
that does not extend to threats.
best regards
Hannah Bell
MLA District 11 Charlottetown-Parkdale
Office of the Third Party / Bureau du troisième parti
Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island / Assemblée législative de
l'Île-du-Prince-Édouard
www.thirdpartypei.ca
Tel/Tél. : 902-620-3977
http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/
OPINION: Time to rock cradle
Published: Mar 23 at 9:11 a.m.
Consensus Government model could be effective solution to many concerns P.E.I. faces
BY JAMES AYLWARD GUEST OPINIONIn his column of March 10, 2018, Alan Holman suggested the party I lead would not support Mixed Proportional representation because we favour the existing system. I would like to correct him on that point. I believe reform of our system is essential to enhancing trust and respect and to maintain a high level of public involvement. I took the position that the party should not formally engage to promote one specific option thereby avoiding the charge of the party trying to influence the outcome.
I support the results of the plebiscite and our PC MLA’s were allowed a free vote. The failure of the premier to act on that preference has further undermined trust in the system and politicians. It has also offered us another opportunity to consider radical reform.
I was disappointed in one aspect of the process - all of the options presented to Islanders were based on the continued direct role of political parties. For those truly interested in reform, I for one, wonder why the Nunavut model of Consensus Government was not presented. It is a model that given the population of Prince Edward Island could be a very effective solution to many of the concerns we face.
It may seem strange for the leader of a political party to be suggesting the possible adoption of a system that does not involve the political parties. Nunavut was established in 1999 and deliberately opted for an elected assembly void of political parties. We now have four main registered political parties in the province, vying for support, advancing policies, raising money, nominating candidates. It may seem like a healthy political environment but is it the most effective? Each party offers some highly talented individuals, some are elected in government and have either a cabinet or backbench role, others are elected in opposition. Many times, the talent of backbench members and opposition members are underutilized in the governing process although they have an equal interest in helping Islanders. My interest in changing the current system is to come up with a process that fully utilizes the talents of all elected MLA’s.
Our current system is based on the winner take all, decide all. This reduces the role of individual MLA’s. As you may recall from part one of my article there is a need for serious reform of the role of MLA’s.
Consensus government achieves that. Each MLA is elected on an individual independent candidate basis. No party platforms, no party signs, no party advertising, no premiers selected by a party, no focus on politics over policy, no backbenchers, no formal opposition. Just good people elected by each district working to provide good government.
All MLAs meet following the election and from their own members elect a speaker and premier, and then the cabinet; all by secret ballot. The premier can assign and reassign portfolios, but it requires a two-thirds vote of all MLAs to remove a minister.
The cabinet is always smaller than half the members so that nothing can be achieved without the input and support of non- cabinet members. Cabinet is truly accountable to the assembly. Mid-term there is a leadership review of the cabinet. Individual members of the assembly have more influence over government actions.
The government business plan, budget estimates and capital expenditures are reviewed in draft form prior to formal presentation to the assembly. MLA’s have the opportunity to suggest changes before the plans are finalized. There is more open discussion and without party lines more openness to collaboration.
We are a province of 150,000. We are the cradle of Confederation. We could also be the cradle of change among the ten provinces for more effective government. Maybe it is time to rock the cradle.
- James Aylward, Leader of Official Opposition and Progressive Conservative Party of P.E.I.
Office of the Official Opposition
PO Box 338
Charlottetown PE C1A 7K7
Office address:
3rd floor, Coles Building
175 Richmond St.
Contact information:
Tel: 902-368-4360
Fax: 902-368-4377
Email: jsjaylward@assembly.pe.ca
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 15:04:36 -0400
Subject: Hey folks remember the emails I sent in in 2014 when Ghiz
quit? If not scroll down
To: dwcurrie@gov.pe.ca, samyers@assembly.pe.ca,
omcrane@assembly.pe.ca, jsjaylward@assembly.pe.ca,
crlavie@assembly.pe.ca, twright@theguardian.pe.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "peter.dauphinee"<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>,
COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
"PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
leanne.butler@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca> ,
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
"Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>,
"andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>,
"maxime.bernier"<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
Island Conservatives get their pick with Scheer
Scheer's home province of Saskatchewan only place he received more
support than P.E.I.
By Kerry Campbell, CBC News Posted: May 29, 2017 5:00 PM AT
Conservatives on P.E.I. are pleased with the selection of Andrew
Scheer as the party's new federal leader.
Scheer proved to be the Island favourite from the get-go, leading the
province in voting through all 13 rounds of counting required for the
party to select a leader Saturday night.
Andrew Scheer elected new Conservative leader
Who is Andrew Scheer? His rise from House Speaker to Conservative leader
"I think he could relate to people," said Martha Ellis, president of
the Charlottetown Conservative Electoral District Association. Ellis
said she ranked Scheer number one on her ballot.
"He's young, he's very mild-mannered, he's a family person, he came
from rural Canada…. I think people felt that he could relate to
Islanders and the issues that we have down here."
Support 2nd only to Saskatchewan
In total, Scheer received 70.8 per cent of the support up for grabs
from the Island's four federal ridings. The only province where Scheer
ended up with a higher total is his home province of Saskatchewan.
According to PC MLA Steven Myers, one of the issues that won support
for Scheer on the Island was his support of supply management. Maxime
Bernier, considered by many to be the front-runner heading into the
vote, had vowed to get rid of the system.
PEI MLA Steven Myers
Island PC MLA Steven Myers says Andrew Scheer's support of supply
management helped him win the support of P.E.I. Conservatives in his
bid to become party leader. (CBC)
"That's one of the reasons I didn't vote Bernier at all is because
supply management is very important here on Prince Edward Island,"
said Myers. "We still have an economy that's largely based on
agriculture. Supply management is important for Island farmers to have
it protected so that we have a good strong industry here on the
Island."
The interim leader of the Progressive Conservative Party on P.E.I.
Jamie Fox said Scheer's time as Speaker of the House of Commons in
Ottawa also helped him secure the support of Conservative party
members.
New leader has 'broad appeal,' says council member
"It showed that he had the ability to work fairly with all parties in
the House, that he had the confidence of the House and members from
all sides," said Fox. "That was a big thing."
Sylvia Poirier represents P.E.I. on the National Council of the
Conservative Party of Canada. She was in Toronto for the leadership
convention.
Martha Ellis
Martha Ellis from the Charlottetown Conservative Electoral District
Association said Andrew Scheer is able to relate to Islanders and
their issues. (CBC)
She gave a favourable review of the ranked ballot system the party
used to select Scheer, saying it made for a "less divisive" convention
and the selection of a candidate she believes can appeal to a wide
range of Canadians, including those in the Atlantic region.
"Scheer's platform was more moderate and I think had a broader
appeal," Poirier said. "And I think people put him on their ballot for
that reason."
She said the year-long campaign energized party supporters and
resulted in a fundraising boost, but said "I think people in general
are happy that it's done. It certainly was quite a huge process."
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:20:15 -0700
Subject: Obviously I just contacted Ms Dorsey and the RCMP again
To: mmdorsey@gov.pe.ca, "roger.l.brown"<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
http://www.gov.pe.ca/phone/
Dorsey, Michele
Deputy Minister and Deputy Attorney General
Environment, Labour and Justice
(902) 368-5152
(902) 368-4910
Shaw Building
South 4th Floor
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 2000
95 Rochford Street
Charlottetown
C1A 7N8
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:50:13 -0700
Subject: At least you smiling bastards can't deny that I contacted you
and sent you people many documents before the evil Premier Ghiz made
his VERY predictable announcement today EH Petey Baby MacKay?
To: dwcurrie@gov.pe.ca, samyers@assembly.pe.ca,
omcrane@assembly.pe.ca, jsjaylward@assembly.pe.ca,
crlavie@assembly.pe.ca, twright@theguardian.pe.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
MulcaT <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
"Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, acampbell
<acampbell@ctv.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, oldmaison
<oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "peter.dauphinee"<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>,
COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>,
"Davidc.Coon"<Davidc.Coon@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, Mackap
<Mackap@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
marnoon@cbc.ca, psmith@charlottetown.ca, craig.gibson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
leanne.butler@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
"Ghiz said that he was leaving at a time when he was proud of his
government's record, and that he had faith in the team he had built.
The premier said he had no plans apart from more time with his family.
He said he did not have any current intention to run federally, but he
did not rule it out in the future."
Yea Right how many times have we heard that before? Duhhh???
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
On 11/10/14, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/pe/
>
> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/pe/
>
> "In June 2004, C/Supt. Gibson was transferred to Ottawa Headquarters
> and assumed the role and responsibilities as Executive Officer to the
> Commissioner"
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.
>
> .https://www.youtube.com/
>
> https://twitter.com/
>
> Maritime Noon @CBCMaritimeNoon
> Share #YourOpinion on recall legislation... would allow voters to kick
> MLAs out of office midway through term @PC_Caucus_PEI #cbcpei
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/
>
> http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/
>
> Hon. Steven Myers
> Leader of the Official Opposition
> MLA for District 2: Georgetown - St. Peters
> Tel:(902) 368-4360
> Fax: (902) 368-4377
> Email: samyers@assembly.pe.ca
>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Coon, David (LEG)"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:02:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Coon and his boss Dizzy Lizzy
May will enjoy my comment about a "Not So Happy Dentist" on PEI the
Xmass N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email.
I’m out of the office and will be back on January 2nd, 2018. During
this period I will not be responding personally to my emails.
If you are looking for assistance of a personal nature & live in the
riding of Fredericton South, please contact my Constituency
Coordinator by email at Taeyon.Kim@gnb.caTaeyo
>
or 455-0936.
For media inquiries, please contact Shannon at
Shannon.carmont@gnb.ca
Best Regards,
David Coon
MLA Fredericton South & Leader of the Green Party
Merci pour votre courriel.
Je suis hors du bureau et reviendrai le 31 juillet 2017. Pendant cette
période, je ne répondrai pas personnellement à mes courriels.
Si vous êtes à la recherche d'une aide personnelle et habitez la
circonscription de Fredericton South, veuillez contacter ma
coordonnatrice de circonscription par courriel à
Taeyon.Kim@gnb.caTaeyo
Pour toute question concernant les médias, veuillez contacter Shannon
à Shannon.carmont@gnb.ca
Meilleures salutations,
David Coon
MLA Fredericton South et chef du Parti Vert
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:02:20 +0000
Subject: RE: Methinks David Coon and his boss Dizzy Lizzy May will
enjoy my comment about a "Not So Happy Dentist" on PEI the Xmass N'esy
Pas Chucky Leblanc?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be
assured that your email will be reviewed. Happy Holidays!
If this is a media request, please forward your email to
media-medias@gnb.camed
******************************
Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du
Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné.
Joyeuses Fêtes!
Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à
media-medias@gnb.camed
---------- Original message ----------
From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:02:18 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Coon and his boss Dizzy Lizzy
May will enjoy my comment about a "Not So Happy Dentist" on PEI the
Xmass N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
support, please contact our Customer Service department at
1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
press releases
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Harpelle, Paul (ENB)"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:02:20 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks David Coon and his boss Dizzy Lizzy
May will enjoy my comment about a "Not So Happy Dentist" on PEI the
Xmass N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
I am away from my office until January 3, 2018. I will be checking my
e-mails on occasion.
Je suis absent de mon bureau jusqu'au 3 janvier 2018. Je vérifierai
mon courriel occasionnellement.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Elizabeth.May@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:02:18 +0000
Subject: Thank you for contacting the Office of Elizabeth May, O.C., M.P
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for contacting me. This response is to assure you that your
message has been received. I welcome and appreciate receiving comments
and questions from constituents.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:02:15 -0400
Subject: Methinks David Coon and his boss Dizzy Lizzy May will enjoy
my comment about a "Not So Happy Dentist" on PEI the Xmass N'esy Pas
Chucky Leblanc?
To: oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>,
"elizabeth.may"<elizabeth.may@parl.gc.ca>, "David.Coon"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, COCMoncton <COCMoncton@gmail.com>,
upriverwatch <upriverwatch@gmail.com>, jbosnitch
<jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
"blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, briangallant10
<briangallant10@gmail.com>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>,
BrianThomasMacdonald <BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<randy.mckeen@gnb.ca>, "kirk.macdonald"<kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca>,
"carl.urquhart"<carl.urquhart@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, newsroom
<newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "jeremy.keefe"
<jeremy.keefe@globalnews.ca>, "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,
Ezra , "Jacques.Poitras"
<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "darrow.macintyre"
<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "Paul.Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Thursday, 21 December 2017
How boring is politicking in the Maritimes when a Green Meanie Leader
gets booted out of the House and nobody cares?
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/prince-edward-island/pei-green-leader-bevan-baker-removed-from-legislature-water-act-1.4459489
Green leader turfed from P.E.I. Legislature as sitting comes to dramatic close
Bevan-Baker escorted from chamber after referring to 'farcical' debate over legislation
By Kerry Campbell, CBC NewsPosted: Dec 20, 2017 9:28 PM AT11 Comments According to CBC however five comments were blocked N'esy Pas?
Commenting is now closed for this story.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:38:56 -0400
Subject: Attention Chief Paul Smith
To: Andrew Blackadar <Andrew.Blackadar@rcmp-grc.gc.
psmith@charlottetown.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.sk.ca>, gatownsend@assembly.pe.ca, jdfox@assembly.pe.ca,
jmcallaghan@assembly.pe.ca, psbevanbaker@assembly.pe.ca,
tdwatts@assembly.pe.ca, sjgallant@assembly.pe.ca, "jill.chisholm"
<jill.chisholm@justice.gc.ca>, baodonnell@assembly.pe.ca,
ajmcdonald@assembly.pe.ca, akemp <akemp@andrewkemp.ca>, "Dale.Morgan"
<Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
"premier.ministre"<premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc.
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"
<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, iteam <iteam@cbc.ca>, investigations
<investigations@cbc.ca>, w5 <w5@ctv.ca>, Whistleblower
<Whistleblower@ctv.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<craig.callens@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<ron.tremblay2@gmail.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,markandcaroline <markandcaroline@gmail.com>, "rona.ambrose.A1"
<rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca>, "carolyn.bennett"
<carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, "Chantal.Farrah"
<Chantal.Farrah@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
WRONG but thanks for finally showing me your arse
Tell your lawyers to stay tuned and to keep reading and listening as well.
http://davidraymondamos3.
Judge Bell Dec 14th
https://archive.org/details/
Judge Southcott Jan 11th
https://archive.org/details/
Veritas Vincit
David Raymond Amos
902 800 0369
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Smith, Paul"<psmith@charlottetown.ca>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:33:39 +0000
Subject: RE: I just called the dudes in PEI about Federal Court File
No: T-1557-15 and only the sneaky Sgt at Arms Al MacDonald bothered to
call me back Go Figure EH Bob Paulson?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Good Afternoon,
Email rec'd however it appears that other than an information item
there is nothing relating to this agency. Appear the Courts rendered a
decision on T-1557-15 in January of this year.
P. Smith
---------- Original message ----------
From: Andrew Blackadar <Andrew.Blackadar@rcmp-grc.gc.
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 10:44:52 -0500
Subject: Re: Fwd: I just called the dudes in PEI about Federal Court
File No: T-1557-15 and only the sneaky Sgt at Arms Al MacDonald
bothered to call me back Go Figure EH Bob Paulson?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Morning David,
It has been a long time since I heard from you. Just want to let you
know that I have left the Maritimes and am now living in British
Columbia.
Andrew
>>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 2016/02/10 7:40 AM >>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 11:40:24 -0400
Subject: Fwd: I just called the dudes in PEI about Federal Court File
No: T-1557-15 and only the sneaky Sgt at Arms Al MacDonald bothered to
call me back Go Figure EH Bob Paulson?To: andrew.blackadar@rcmp-grc.gc.
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
<Chantal.Farrah@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<roger.l.brown@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>
http://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/
Chief Paul Smith
P O Box 98
Charlottetown, PE
C1A 2T3
Telephone: (902) 629-4172
psmith@charlottetown.ca
http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/pe/
Sgt. Andrew Blackadar
RCMP Media Relations Officer
Tel: 902 566 7149
Cell: 902 940 3183
andrew.blackadar@rcmp-grc.gc.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 08:08:22 -0700
Subject: I just called the dudes in PEI about Federal Court File No:
T-1557-15 and only the sneaky Sgt at Arms Al MacDonald bothered to
call me back Go Figure EH Bob Paulson?
To: gatownsend@assembly.pe.ca, jdfox@assembly.pe.ca,
mgdrake@assembly.pe.ca, psbevanbaker@assembly.pe.ca,
tdwatts@assembly.pe.ca, sjgallant@assembly.pe.ca,
baodonnell@assembly.pe.ca, ajmcdonald@assembly.pe.ca
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/
http://www.assembly.pe.ca/
Hon. Francis (Buck) Watts Speaker
Sonny Gallant Deputy Speaker
Hazel Gallant Administrative Assistant
197 Richmond Street
(Church Street Entrance)
Mailing address:
P.O. Box 2000
Charlottetown, PE C1A 7N8
Tel: (902) 368-4310
Fax: (902) 368-4473
http://www.assembly.pe.ca/
Hon. John A. McQuaid Commissioner
Barbara O'Donnell Administrative Assistant
P.O. Box 2000
Charlottetown, PE
C1A 7K7
Tel: (902) 368-5970
Fax: (902) 368-5175
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:29:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as
it applies to my complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called
and tried to talk a lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing
the hearings held on Dec 14th and Jan 11th
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
I will be out of the office until January 15th. If you have media
inquiries please contact Valerie Gervais at 6139446475 or
valerie.gervais@parl.gc.ca
Je serai absente jusqu'au 15 janvier. Pour les demandes de medias
veuillez communiquer avec Valerie Gervais au 6139446475 ou
valerie.gervais@parl.gc.ca
Heather Bradley
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Fraser, Bill Hon. (THC/TPC)"<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:57:11 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as
it applies to my complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called
and tried to talk a lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing
the hearings held on Dec 14th and Jan 11th
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Please be advised that I am out of the
office from December 30, 2015 to January 16, 2016 inclusive. The Hon.
Brian Kenny will be Acting in my place until my return on January 17,
2016. He can be reached through my secretary at 506-453-3009.
Happy New Year!
Je vous remercie pour votre courriel. Veuillez noter que je suis hors
du bureau du 30 décembre 2015 au 16 janvier 2016 inclusivement.
L'hon. Brian Kenny agira par intérim jusqu'à mon retour le 17 janvier
2016. Il peut être rejoint par l'intermédiaire de ma secrétaire au
506-453-3009.
Bonne et heureuse année!
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Catherine.McKenna@parl.gc.ca
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 19:23:01 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as
it applies to my complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called
and tried to talk a lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing
the hearings held on Dec 14th and Jan 11th
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
Thank you for writing to the Honourable Catherine McKenna, Member of
Parliament for Ottawa Centre. Your message will be carefully reviewed.
Note: This receipt notification was generated by an automatic response
system. Please do not reply to this message.
***
Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Catherine McKenna, deput?e pour
Ottawa-Centre. Votre message sera examin? soigneusement.
Remarque : Cet accus? de r?ception vous est livr? par un syst?me de
r?ponse automatique. Veuillez ne pas y r?pondre.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:15:03 -0400
Subject: Re: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to
my complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to
talk a lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings
held on Dec 14th and Jan 11th
To: david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Thank you for being ethical.
Best Regards
Dave
On 1/15/16, david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca<david.mcguinty@parl.gc.ca>
wrote:
> Received. Thank you.
> ______________________________
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Sent: January 15, 2016 2:22 PM
> To: McGuinty, David - M.P.; McKay, John - M.P.; Long, Wayne - Riding
1;
> McKenna, Catherine - M.P.; McCrimmon, Karen - Riding 1; Ludwig, Karen
-
> Riding 2; karen.ludwig.nb; MacKinnon, Steven - Député
> Cc: David Amos
> Subject: Fwd: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies
to my
> complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to talk
a lot
> bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings held on
Dec
> 14th
> and Jan 11th
>
From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:05:07 +0000
Subject: RE: So what does Premier Gallant and Minister Doucet et al
think of my lawsuit? How about David Coon and his blogging buddy
Chucky joking about being illegally barred from parliamentary property
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
and a response will be forthcoming.
Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
Mallory Fowler
Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
On 1/19/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Good Day Sir
>>
>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>
>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>
>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>> suggested that you study closely.
>>
>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>
>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> April 3rd, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>
>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>
>>
>> The only hearing thus far
>>
>> May 24th, 2017
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>>
>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>
>> Date: 20151223
>>
>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>
>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>
>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> ORDER
>>
>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>> December 14, 2015)
>>
>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>> in its entirety.
>>
>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>> he stated:
>>
>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>
>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>> Police.
>>
>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>
>>
>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>> is no order as to costs.
>>
>> “B. Richard Bell”
>> Judge
>>
>>
>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>
>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>
>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>> most
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>> dudes are way past too late
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>
>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Merci ,
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>
>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>
>> Subject:
>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>
>> January 30, 2007
>>
>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>
>> Mr. David Amos
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>
>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>
>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>> Minister of Health
>>
>> CM/cb
>>
>>
>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>
>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>
>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>
>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>
>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>
>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>
>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>> Traffic Services NCO
>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>>
>>
>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>> fax: 506-444-5224
>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
>> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
>> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
>> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too
>> late
>> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
>> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.
>> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca,
>> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
>> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.
>> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.
>> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
>> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>>
>> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-
>>
>> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>
>> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
>> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
>> Feferal Court?
>>
>> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
>> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
>> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
>> the USDOJ for me will ya?
>> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
>> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
>> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca
>> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>>
>> QSLS Politics
>> By Location Visit Detail
>> Visit 29,419
>> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
>> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
>> ISP US Dept of Justice
>> Location Continent : North America
>> Country : United States (Facts)
>> State : District of Columbia
>> City : Washington
>> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
>> Language English (U.S.) en-us
>> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
>> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
>> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
>> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
>> DI60SP1001)
>> Javascript version 1.3
>> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
>> Color Depth : 32 bits
>> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
>> Visit Length 0 seconds
>> Page Views 1
>> Referring URL http://www.google.co...
>> Search Engine google.com
>> Search Words david amos bernie madoff
>> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy-
>> Out Click
>> Time Zone UTC-5:00
>> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm
>> Visit Number 29,419
>>
>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot.
>>
>>
>> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its
>> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400
>> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy
>> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry
>> affect the interests of every person in every district of every
>> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with
>> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and
>> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record.
>>
>> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of
>> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the
>> Conservatives
>>
>>
>> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the
>> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments
>>
>> Here is why
>>
>> http://banking.senate.gov/
>>
>> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate
>> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice
>> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the
>> following file
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>
>> http://occupywallst.org/users/
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Hansen, David"David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000
>> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Hello Mr. Amos,
>>
>> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic
>> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil
>> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named
>> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an
>> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which
>> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please
>> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action
>> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other
>> matters.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> David A. Hansen
>> Regional Director | Directeur régional
>> General Counsel |Avocat général
>> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et
>> services de consultation
>> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice
>> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke
>> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse
>> B3J 1P3
>> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca
>> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902)
>> 426-2329
>> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client
>> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If
>> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete
>> this entire e-mail.
>> Before printing think about the Environment
>> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary.
>> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>>
>>> FBI Boston
>>> One Center Plaza
>>> Suite 600
>>> Boston, MA 02108
>>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>>
>>> Hours
>>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com,
>>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>>
>>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/
>>>
>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>
>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>> cards?
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>
>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>
>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>> tapes.
>>>
>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>> To: "Rob Talach"rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>>
>>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>>> a lot to you
>>>
>>> http://www.checktheevidence.
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>>> Bernadine Chapman??
>>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme
>>> >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.
>>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>
>>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/
>>>
>>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/
>>>
>>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>>> Constable Peddle???
>>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>>> Director General
>>> HR Transformation
>>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> Tel 613-843-6039
>>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>>
>>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>>
>>> tél 613-843-6039
>>> cel 613-818-6947
>>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>
http://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 19 November 2017
Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court
https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2017-10-30
Neutral citation
2017 FCA 213
File numbers
A-48-16
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
THE COURT
Date: 20171030
Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
I. Introduction
[1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).
[2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).
[3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
[4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.
II. Preliminary Matter
[5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.
[6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:
5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]
5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.
[7] However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.
[9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.
[10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.
[11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
[12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.
[13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.
[14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
[15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
[17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).
[18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.
32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)
[19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.
[20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
[21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
[22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
[23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.
[24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
[25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
III. Issue
[26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
IV. Analysis
A. Standard of Review
[27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).
[28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.
B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?
[29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)
21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].
[30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).
[31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
[13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
[32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
[33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…
To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
[34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
[35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.
[36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
V. Conclusion
[37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:
A-48-16
STYLE OF CAUSE:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
PLACE OF HEARING:
Fredericton,
New Brunswick
DATE OF HEARING:
May 24, 2017
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.
DATED:
October 30, 2017
APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos
For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)
Jan Jensen
For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
http://www.theguardian.pe.ca/
EXCLUSIVE: Bush Dumville breaks his silence on decision to leave the Liberal caucus
Published: Feb 07 at 5:57 a.m.
It was 10 a.m. on Wednesday morning last week when Bush Dumville walked into the Shaw Building unannounced, holding his letter of resignation from the Liberal caucus, ready to hand-deliver it to Premier Wade MacLauchlan.
“Give him hell,” the commissionaire said to Dumville as he let him through security.
Little did he know that Dumville planned to do just that.
Dumville finally broke his silence Tuesday in an exclusive interview with the Guardian. The West Royalty-Springvale MLA detailed the full account of events that led to his decision to resign from the government side of the house and sit as an independent last week.
Dumville has been an MLA for over 10 years, beginning his term in office under former premier Robert Ghiz in 2007 and re-elected in 2011 and in 2015.
But, it was the lead-up to the 2015 provincial election that proved to be the beginning of the end of Dumville’s stomach for remaining part of the current Liberal team.
RELATED: MLA Bush Dumville resigns from Liberal caucus to sit as independent
In January 2015, he learned he would be challenged for the nomination in his district – something that raised many eyebrows at the time. Dumville and his supporters were convinced the party was supporting his challenger, Windsor Wight.
So, Dumville says he decided to visit MacLauchlan at his home. At that time, it was still unclear what riding MacLauchlan would run in. In fact, he still hadn’t been officially declared leader of the Liberal Party, although he was the only candidate.
The two went for a walk with MacLauchlan’s dogs, when Dumville says he offered to step aside and let MacLauchlan run in his district. MacLauchlan told him it was a generous offer, he had other plans.
“Then a few minutes later, we were up a little way around the corner and he said, ‘By the way Bush, you will not be in cabinet.”
He took this as a blow.
“How would it make you feel if a premier told you wouldn’t be in cabinet before you were nominated? That’s when something snapped inside. Then I was running, and I was running hard.”
He spent the next two months working his district to win the Liberal nomination, which he did on March 6, 2015, by 11 votes. He says 600 people attended this meeting, of which 255 people voted.
One month later, MacLauchlan dropped the election writ, and Dumville was back on doorsteps to fight for re-election to the legislature, which he also accomplished.
Now he was a member of MacLauchlan’s caucus, where he says he never felt welcome.
His first dustup with the premier’s office came when he became one of three Liberal MLAs who ran for the role of House Speaker.
After he was quoted in a Guardian article about the race, Dumville says MacLauchlan’s chief of staff, Robert Vessey, chastised him for speaking to the press “without permission.”
“He said, ‘You’ve got a bad attitude,’ ” Dumville recalls, saying Vessey told him he had better go see the premier.
Dumville refused and told Vessey he would speak to the press anytime he wanted.
“After that, here’s Bush, sitting over there in the corner, being requested to hold the party line, vote on the party line, chair committees with never a thank you, nothing,” he said.
“I felt like a junkyard dog chained up in the corner… They just wanted me to be docile. They needed me to work and to vote their way.”
He was unhappy, but he stayed put, waiting for the right time to make a move.
“It’s hard to be in a situation where you’re not wanted, but I’ll be damned if I was going to quit over it.”
He cited several other incidents over the last three years that further convinced him to consider his options. The biggest came after Alberton-Roseville MLA Pat Murphy spoke out against school closures in February 2017 and was then promoted to cabinet.
Following this appointment, Dumville says MacLauchlan met with all his MLAs to “hand out little goodies.”
He asked Dumville to accept a position on a cabinet committee – which would give him a $6,500 boost to his salary, a fact he says the premier noted.
“I looked at him and said, ‘You’ve just made Pat Murphy a minister. Gave him a $30,000 or $40,000 raise and a car. I’m not really interested in a $6,000 consolation prize. Premier, I’m resigning from caucus.’ You should have seen his eyes.”
Dumville says the premier asked him to reconsider, which he did.
RELATED: Dumville decision disappoints elector
Then, earlier this month, after once again being overlooked in a January cabinet shuffle, Dumville says he decided to finally follow through with his resignation after what he believes was a deliberate attempt by the party to once again move in on his district.
During a founding meeting for his newly redrawn District 15 to elect a new executive, two positions were contested, and the person Dumville was supporting for president did not win.
“The straw that broke the camel’s back was that farce of a meeting, pulling the same old tricks that they did in 2015,” Dumville said.
“These things happen in Russia and in Third World countries, and who would ever imagine that a learned person would ever resort to these types of tactics.”
That’s why, last Wednesday, he walked into the premier’s office and handed him his letter of resignation.
“I said, ‘I’ll be a federal Liberal in good standing. I’d like to be a provincial Liberal in good standing, however I’ll not be in your Liberal caucus because I do not support you.’”
He then dismissed himself, describing the feeling of walking back down the hallway to “walking the gauntlet.”
Last week, MacLauchlan dismissed the notion his party was behind contested executive positions. He said he expects his caucus MLAs to respect the values of inclusiveness and democracy and that it "has been clear for some time that Mr. Dumville has struggled to share the values of our Liberal caucus and Liberal party."
"It's an open and inclusive and democratic process, and I'm delighted to walk into a meeting and find the hall full or to see them putting out additional chairs," MacLauchlan said last week.
Going forward, Dumville says he will remain an “independent Liberal” until the next election, explaining that he owes it to his constituents to serve out his mandate as a Liberal.
But when asked if he would consider running for another party in the next election, he suggested he’d be willing to examine his options.
“As we get closer to an election, people will be looking for their nominees and then I’ll have to make a decision if there’s a nomination open somewhere for me in some party. I don’t know.”
One thing is certain, Dumville says he will not resign his seat, vowing to use his time in the legislature in the spring to challenge the premier on questions of character and ethics.
His biggest concern is that his constituents could suffer now that he is no longer in government and left on poor terms.
Dumville admits the last week has been a rollercoaster of emotions.
“I don’t know what’s going to happen. This may be the end of my political career or it could be the beginning of my political career. Only time will tell.”
“Give him hell,” the commissionaire said to Dumville as he let him through security.
Little did he know that Dumville planned to do just that.
Dumville finally broke his silence Tuesday in an exclusive interview with the Guardian. The West Royalty-Springvale MLA detailed the full account of events that led to his decision to resign from the government side of the house and sit as an independent last week.
Dumville has been an MLA for over 10 years, beginning his term in office under former premier Robert Ghiz in 2007 and re-elected in 2011 and in 2015.
But, it was the lead-up to the 2015 provincial election that proved to be the beginning of the end of Dumville’s stomach for remaining part of the current Liberal team.
RELATED: MLA Bush Dumville resigns from Liberal caucus to sit as independent
In January 2015, he learned he would be challenged for the nomination in his district – something that raised many eyebrows at the time. Dumville and his supporters were convinced the party was supporting his challenger, Windsor Wight.
So, Dumville says he decided to visit MacLauchlan at his home. At that time, it was still unclear what riding MacLauchlan would run in. In fact, he still hadn’t been officially declared leader of the Liberal Party, although he was the only candidate.
The two went for a walk with MacLauchlan’s dogs, when Dumville says he offered to step aside and let MacLauchlan run in his district. MacLauchlan told him it was a generous offer, he had other plans.
“Then a few minutes later, we were up a little way around the corner and he said, ‘By the way Bush, you will not be in cabinet.”
He took this as a blow.
TIMELINE:
Jan. 2015 – Dumville says he was told by Wade MacLauchlan he would never be in cabinet
March 6, 2015 – Dumville wins contested nomination in District 15 West Royalty-Springvale
April 6, 2015 – Provincial election is called
May 4, 2015 – Liberals win third term government with Wade MacLauchlan as new premier
Feb. 2017 – Dumville tells the premier he will resign from caucus but reconsiders
Jan. 25, 2018 – Founding meeting for new District 15 Brackley-Hunter River
Jan. 31, 2018 – Dumville resigns from Liberal caucus
“How would it make you feel if a premier told you wouldn’t be in cabinet before you were nominated? That’s when something snapped inside. Then I was running, and I was running hard.”
He spent the next two months working his district to win the Liberal nomination, which he did on March 6, 2015, by 11 votes. He says 600 people attended this meeting, of which 255 people voted.
One month later, MacLauchlan dropped the election writ, and Dumville was back on doorsteps to fight for re-election to the legislature, which he also accomplished.
Now he was a member of MacLauchlan’s caucus, where he says he never felt welcome.
His first dustup with the premier’s office came when he became one of three Liberal MLAs who ran for the role of House Speaker.
After he was quoted in a Guardian article about the race, Dumville says MacLauchlan’s chief of staff, Robert Vessey, chastised him for speaking to the press “without permission.”
“He said, ‘You’ve got a bad attitude,’ ” Dumville recalls, saying Vessey told him he had better go see the premier.
Dumville refused and told Vessey he would speak to the press anytime he wanted.
BUSH DUMVILLE AT A GLANCE
S. Forrest (Bush) Dumville was elected to the legislature in 2007. He was re-elected in 2011 and again in 2015.
Prior to entering politics, Dumville was a local businessman, community volunteer and a member of the RCMP. He has served for over 30 years with the Rotary Club of Charlottetown. He opened the Burger King restaurants in Charlottetown and Summerside.
He is past Master of the P.E.I. Masonic Order and a member of the Island Shrine Club and Philae Temple of Nova Scotia and P.E.I.
“After that, here’s Bush, sitting over there in the corner, being requested to hold the party line, vote on the party line, chair committees with never a thank you, nothing,” he said.
“I felt like a junkyard dog chained up in the corner… They just wanted me to be docile. They needed me to work and to vote their way.”
He was unhappy, but he stayed put, waiting for the right time to make a move.
“It’s hard to be in a situation where you’re not wanted, but I’ll be damned if I was going to quit over it.”
He cited several other incidents over the last three years that further convinced him to consider his options. The biggest came after Alberton-Roseville MLA Pat Murphy spoke out against school closures in February 2017 and was then promoted to cabinet.
Following this appointment, Dumville says MacLauchlan met with all his MLAs to “hand out little goodies.”
He asked Dumville to accept a position on a cabinet committee – which would give him a $6,500 boost to his salary, a fact he says the premier noted.
“I looked at him and said, ‘You’ve just made Pat Murphy a minister. Gave him a $30,000 or $40,000 raise and a car. I’m not really interested in a $6,000 consolation prize. Premier, I’m resigning from caucus.’ You should have seen his eyes.”
Dumville says the premier asked him to reconsider, which he did.
RELATED: Dumville decision disappoints elector
Then, earlier this month, after once again being overlooked in a January cabinet shuffle, Dumville says he decided to finally follow through with his resignation after what he believes was a deliberate attempt by the party to once again move in on his district.
During a founding meeting for his newly redrawn District 15 to elect a new executive, two positions were contested, and the person Dumville was supporting for president did not win.
“The straw that broke the camel’s back was that farce of a meeting, pulling the same old tricks that they did in 2015,” Dumville said.
“These things happen in Russia and in Third World countries, and who would ever imagine that a learned person would ever resort to these types of tactics.”
That’s why, last Wednesday, he walked into the premier’s office and handed him his letter of resignation.
“I said, ‘I’ll be a federal Liberal in good standing. I’d like to be a provincial Liberal in good standing, however I’ll not be in your Liberal caucus because I do not support you.’”
He then dismissed himself, describing the feeling of walking back down the hallway to “walking the gauntlet.”
Last week, MacLauchlan dismissed the notion his party was behind contested executive positions. He said he expects his caucus MLAs to respect the values of inclusiveness and democracy and that it "has been clear for some time that Mr. Dumville has struggled to share the values of our Liberal caucus and Liberal party."
"It's an open and inclusive and democratic process, and I'm delighted to walk into a meeting and find the hall full or to see them putting out additional chairs," MacLauchlan said last week.
Going forward, Dumville says he will remain an “independent Liberal” until the next election, explaining that he owes it to his constituents to serve out his mandate as a Liberal.
But when asked if he would consider running for another party in the next election, he suggested he’d be willing to examine his options.
“As we get closer to an election, people will be looking for their nominees and then I’ll have to make a decision if there’s a nomination open somewhere for me in some party. I don’t know.”
One thing is certain, Dumville says he will not resign his seat, vowing to use his time in the legislature in the spring to challenge the premier on questions of character and ethics.
His biggest concern is that his constituents could suffer now that he is no longer in government and left on poor terms.
Dumville admits the last week has been a rollercoaster of emotions.
“I don’t know what’s going to happen. This may be the end of my political career or it could be the beginning of my political career. Only time will tell.”
>>>> 370-5628.
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>> Hon. Jim Prentice, P.C., Q.C.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: OMBUDSMAN Mailbox <OMBUDSMAN@cibc.com>
>>>> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:39:36 +0000
>>>> Subject: Ombudsman Mailbox
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for contacting CIBC.
>>>> We received your message and will reply to you within 48 hours or 2
>>>> business days.
>>>> CIBC Office of the Ombudsman
>>>> ******************************
>>>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec la Banque CIBC.
>>>> Nous avons bien reçu votre message. Nous vous répondrons d'ici les 48
>>>> prochaines heures ou deux jours ouvrable.
>>>> CIBC Bureau de l'ombudsman
>>>>
>>>> https://www.securities-
>>>>
>>>> CSA SECRETARIAT
>>>> Tour de la Bourse
>>>> 800, Square Victoria
>>>> Suite 2510
>>>> Montreal Quebec H4Z 1J2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tel: (514) 864-9510
>>>> Fax: (514) 864-9512
>>>> E-mail: csa-acvm-secretariat@acvm-csa.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>> From: Jonathan Denis QC <Jonathan.Denis@gov.ab.ca>
>>>> Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 21:48:28 +0000
>>>> Subject: RE: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
>>>> Calgary (Tory ineptitude??? Methinks the Herald is no better EH Mr
>>>> Minister Denis?)
>>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> I've learned to ignore the noise and keep focused on the task at
>>>> hand...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________
>>>> From: David Amos [motomaniac333@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 10:14 AM
>>>> To: mike@mikeellis.ca; Raj.Sherman@assembly.ab.ca;
>>>> brianmalkinson@albertandp.ca; bill.kaufmann@sunmedia.ca;
>>>> dbraid@calgaryherald.com; news1@beaconnews.ca;
>>>> thowell@calgaryherald.com; msmith@michaelsmithconsulting.
>>>> the Premier; Bruce.McAllister@assembly.ab.
>>>> Chestermere.rockyview@
>>>> Louise_Healy@banffcentre.ca
>>>> Cc: David Amos; ! Jonathan Denis; mnielsen; dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com;
>>>> atlantic.director@taxpayer.com
>>>> justin.trudeau.a1
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
>>>> Calgary (Tory ineptitude??? Methinks the Herald is no better EH Mr
>>>> Minister Denis?)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.calgaryherald.com/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.calgaryherald.com/
>>>>
>>>> “The Wildrose, which has the most money to throw at this, is going to
>>>> throw everything they’ve got at it to gain some credibility, momentum
>>>> and publicity,” said Lori Williams, associate professor of political
>>>> science at Mount Royal University.
>>>>
>>>> Since becoming PC leader Sept. 6, Prentice has tried to distance
>>>> himself from the Redford government, promising to sell the fleet of
>>>> government aircraft, introduce tougher accountability legislation, end
>>>> entitlements and review rural health care.
>>>>
>>>> But opposition parties dismissed Prentice’s moves as mere
>>>> window-dressing from a party short on ideas, intent on
>>>> self-preservation and maintaining power after 43 years in government.
>>>>
>>>> “Don’t forget that all these things we’re hearing now — change,
>>>> renewal, a new beginning — this is exactly what was rolled out when
>>>> Redford came onto the scene,” said Bruce McAllister, Wildrose MLA for
>>>> Chestermere-Rocky View.
>>>>
>>>> “And we all know how that ended, don’t we.”
>>>> (403) 207-9889
>>>>
>>>> http://www.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.calgarysun.com/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.theanchor.ca/2014/
>>>> News Coverage/Reporter Sarah Papke 403.775.7525
>>>>
>>>> http://www.calgaryherald.com/
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>>
>>>> Derek Fildebrandt
>>>> Alberta Director
>>>> Office Location:
>>>> 3625 Shaganappi Trail NW
>>>> PO Box 84171 Market Mall
>>>> Calgary, Alberta T3A 5C4
>>>> Phone: 1-800-661-0187
>>>> Cell: 403-690-4910
>>>> E-mail: dfildebrandt@taxpayer.com
>>>> Twitter @ DFildebrandt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://beaconnews.ca/blog/
>>>> 604-560-5015
>>>>
>>>> http://albertandp.ca/
>>>> (403) 219-8183
>>>>
>>>> http://mikeellis.ca/connect-
>>>> 403-768-2720
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 18:31:07 -0600
>>>> Subject: Fwd: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
>>>> Calgary
>>>> To: jwood@calgaryherald.com, plknowlt@ucalgary.ca,
>>>> jenniferburgess@albertandp.ca, michelle.glavine@teachers.ab.
>>>> Rhansen <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>, pol7163
>>>> <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, highwood <highwood@assembly.ab.ca>
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.calgaryherald.com/
>>>>
>>>> “The PCs have been arrogant and out-of-touch,” said Macdonald.
>>>>
>>>> “I’m sorry, but the last two weeks of good news announcements by the
>>>> new premier do not make up for the last several years of government
>>>> entitlement and mismanagement.”
>>>>
>>>> Macdonald retired last year after 25 years on the Calgary Police
>>>> Service, where she specialized in cybercrime prevention and Internet
>>>> safety.
>>>>
>>>> YEA RIGHT I bet Ms MacDonald worked with your fellow corrupt cop ICE
>>>> Staff Sgt. Steve Lorne EH Chief Hansen?
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 16:11:07 -0600
>>>> Subject: Here is some VERY serious gossip for the Left Wingers in
>>>> Calgary
>>>> To: greg.clark@albertaparty.ca, mclean@svmlaw.ca,
>>>> Gwyneth.midgley@gmail.com, john.fletcher@shaw.ca, themayor
>>>> <themayor@calgary.ca>
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> "ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca"<ezra.levant@sunmedia.ca>, "joshua.skurnik"
>>>> <joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>,
>>>> wf.munsey@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>> I will lay odds that Col John Fletcher knows exactly who Mr Baconfat
>>>> is EH Ezzy Levant?
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:53:36 -0600
>>>> Subject: Yo Jimmy Prentice the RCMP that you and your minions oversee
>>>> are well aware that my brother did not call Mr Baconfat HOWEVER
>>>> To: "pej.prentice"<pej.prentice@gmail.com>, "Marianne.Ryan"
>>>> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>>> <rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>
>>>> patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Rhansen
>>>> <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>, deanr0032 <deanr0032@hotmail.com>,
>>>> "Gary.Rhodes"<Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, premier
>>>> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, ">"<greg.weston@cbc.ca>, "Mackay.P"
>>>> <Mackay.P@forces.gc.ca>, mccalj <mccalj@parl.gc.ca>, "McCallum.J"
>>>> <McCallum.J@parl.gc.ca>, Mackap <Mackap@parl.gc.ca>, birgir
>>>> <birgir@althingi.is>, birgittaj@althingi.is
>>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>>> <james.goodman@forces.gc.ca>, danielle@wildrosealliance.ca,
>>>> oldmaison@yahoo.com
>>>>
>>>> Anyone recall this email?
>>>>
>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>>>
>>>> Many cops including members and their Officers of Queen's Red Serge
>>>> cannot deny the fact that their blogging butt buddy Mr Baconfat in
>>>> Edmonton and his pal Dirty Dicky Dean in Sylvan Lake in have been
>>>> threatening to kill members of my family for nearly 8 years. Nor can
>>>> the corrupt cops deny the fact that I have the right to self defense
>>>> particularly when the law enforcement dudes refuse to act within the
>>>> scope of their employment. As far as I know duels are still legal as
>>>> long as they are done on the CROWN"s property.
>>>>
>>>> If I opt to come to Edmonton AGAIN in order to file a lawsuit or two
>>>> then take up the nasty Fat Bastard's far from cordial invite to kick
>>>> his evil arse on parliamenty property is his buddy Rod Kniecht and the
>>>> dudes in the RCMP gonna arrest me or hold Mr Baconfat's coat and take
>>>> bet on the outcome?
>>>>
>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>> 902 800 0369
>>>>
>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> Monday, August 25, 2014
>>>> Meet The Fucked Up Amos Brothers, Little Davey,And Dale
>>>>
>>>> A few short weeks ago pathological liar, and convicted sex offender
>>>> David Amos tried to con Lori, myself and cyber-space that he came here
>>>> from his humble hovel in Halifax, to "get me." He was called out,
>>>> called bullshit on and he has ran off to ignominious obscurity and
>>>> silence. What's the old expression, "good riddance to bad rubbish?"
>>>>
>>>> So now little Dale Amos 780 713 6836 Fort Mac Murray has written me,
>>>> and Lori twice to run the mouth and self aggrandize himself .
>>>>
>>>> This is first little missive: " Those Amos videos of your apartment
>>>> are priceless. Are you going to meet him, or are you a gutless shit? I
>>>> personally hopes he kills you."
>>>>
>>>> Then today little Dale Amos wrote this to Lori and me:
>>>>
>>>> "You could call me at 780 713 6836 and we could have a pow wow. If of
>>>> course you have the sand the back up your words. My Brother is most
>>>> definitely ready to hand you a proper shit kicking, and I wouldn't
>>>> mind getting a piece of you after what you said about my nieces.....By
>>>> the way when they are town Gracie plans to visit Lori at work and ask
>>>> her personally about your blog. Heads up Dale Amos." END OF QUOTE
>>>>
>>>> Dale Amos it appears YOU are as much a pathological liar as little
>>>> Davey baby is. Little Davey baby nor his paste swallowing "children"
>>>> could ever rise to the purchase of bus fare, much less a plane ticket,
>>>> to get to Alberta. In fact none of your inbred "family" have the
>>>> intellectual capacity to find Edmonton on a map, on the very best day
>>>> they ever had.
>>>>
>>>> Dale Amos YOU are a gobshite! Your Brother is a gobshite! If YOU feel
>>>> so emotionally committed to "handing me a proper shit kicking," I
>>>> cordially invite you try and do so before waiting for help to do so.
>>>>
>>>> Dale, send my love to your hooker nieces!
>>>>
>>>> Posted by Seren at 6:40 PM
>>>>
>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> Tuesday, September 3, 2013
>>>>
>>>> To sum up!
>>>>
>>>> It is Tuesday, September 3. I am back still traipsing the shallow
>>>> end of bureaucratic government, DND officialdom. David Amos is still
>>>> unemployed and Mr. Canning, and Leah Parsons is still trying to extend
>>>> and parlay their "fifteen minutes of infamy" into something more
>>>> profitable. "For the love of God do something..." they cry. Which
>>>> translates to, what can we get out of all this.
>>>>
>>>> Since Mr. Canning threatened me with "going national" on his blog,
>>>> nothing has occurred. There has been no deluge of e mails to my home,
>>>> none actually. NO torrent of comments to by blog, no promised calls
>>>> from the "media" or outraged articles or other news stories,
>>>> "methinks" Mr. Canning has overstated or exaggerated his importance,
>>>> and influence. I am not over surprised.
>>>>
>>>> Rehtaeh Parsons is still dead, a victim of her selfish, addled and
>>>> negligent "parents", to allow a fifteen year old child to be a drunk
>>>> and promiscuous. According police there are still outstanding photos
>>>> or at least one out there.
>>>>
>>>> David Raymond Amos still infects cyber-space threatening retribution,
>>>> spam and imaginary litigation upon anyone that annoys or irks him.
>>>> From Alison Menard, Robert F. O'Meara, Dan Fouts, Werner Bock, Mark
>>>> Carney and the rest of the "snobby British Banksters and politicians,
>>>> to our own "Stevie Boy Harper. Honourable mention goes to the unnamed
>>>> security constable who David wants his name so he can sue him, for
>>>> some arcane reason known only to, and understood by Amos. David Amos'
>>>> e communications are blocked and ignored, as the products of
>>>> whack-job.
>>>>
>>>> David Amos'"children" Max, and Laura are still hard working
>>>> prostitutes, swallowing paste and giving rim jobs for thirty bucks, a
>>>> pack of smokes in a pinch. And our "friend" David Amos is still
>>>> calling Cruise line a gay chat site for thrills.
>>>>
>>>> Oh dear....The more things change the more they stay the same.
>>>>
>>>> Posted by Seren at 4:23 PM
>>>>
>>>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> Monday, June 7, 2010
>>>> Canada and the United States
>>>> Our friend convicted sex offender David Amos post a few sentences of a
>>>> previous post of mine that was accurate then and still is.
>>>>
>>>> Friday, August 14, 2009 What does Amerika, the "Truther" movment,
>>>> "God" and retards have to do with Canada?
>>>>
>>>> We do not have to worry about comment from Little Dean and Dave...they
>>>> are to uneducated to understand most posts. So have you seen them,
>>>> been annoyed or insulted by them, have you smelled their disease? Have
>>>> you ever crossed the "medicine line" and seen some Yank being taken
>>>> into custody because he just has..."this constitutional right to bear
>>>> arms"...in Canada.
>>>>
>>>> I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>>> into the US policy.
>>>>
>>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation.There was
>>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>>
>>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>>
>>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>>> upon."What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions are
>>>> to met before US troop can redeploy?
>>>>
>>>> Prime Minister Jean Chretien and the PMO were even at the very
>>>> preliminary planning stages wary of Canadian involvement in an Iraq
>>>> operation....History would prove them correct. The political pressure
>>>> being applied on the PMO from the George W Bush administration was
>>>> onerous
>>>>
>>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>>> ....not necessarily in that order.
>>>>
>>>> Essentially Canada was determined to stay out of Iraq, paid the price,
>>>> of a larger role in Afghanistan to enable US military assets to
>>>> redeploy to Iraq. The