, lebrun@nb.aibn.com
Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Alysha.Elliott@gnb.ca,
hugh.flemming@gnb.ca, Dr.France.Desrosiers@vitalitenb.ca

On 3/25/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/restigouche-hospital-youth-centre-ombud-report-northern-mayors-1.5066125
>
> North-south tension rises as leaders fear losing troubled youth mental
> health centre
>
> Northern mayors say moving centre out of Campbellton would be major loss
> Colin McPhail · CBC News · Posted: Mar 25, 2019 6:00 AM AT
>
> https://healthstandards.org/board-directors/george-weber/
>
> https://healthstandards.org/executive-team/
> Health Standards Organization
> 1150 Cyrville Road
> Ottawa, ON, Canada
> K1J 7S9
>
> Phone
> +1 613-738-3800
>
> Leslee J. Thompson ext 222
>
> George Weber
> Board Chair
>
> George Weber has served as President and CEO of the Royal Ottawa
> Health Care Group, one of four standalone specialized mental health
> facilities in Ontario, since 2007.
>
> Over the previous 26 years, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of
> a number of national organizations, such as the Canadian Red Cross and
> Canadian Dental Association, as well as various international
> organizations, including the International Red Cross and Red Crescent
> Societies in Geneva, Switzerland.
>
> Throughout his career, he has been involved in health and humanitarian
> work from multiple dimensions, including dental accreditation. George
> holds a Master’s degree from McGill University and has completed the
> Advanced Management Program from the Graduate School of Business
> Administration, Harvard University, the International Program for
> Board Members from the Institute of Management Development in
> Lausanne, Switzerland and the Directors course sponsored by the
> Institute of Corporate Directors and the Rotman School of Management,
> University of Toronto.
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 14:30:57 -0400
> Subject: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of Ombud NB too After all
> he is the same politically appointed lawyer N'esy Pas?
> To: premier@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
> andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca, brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
> robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre
> <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch@gmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com
>
> ---------- Original  message ----------
> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
> <Premier@ontario.ca>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 19:13:29 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of your
> Acting Integrity Commissioner N'esy Pas?
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
> valued.
>
> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>
> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
> response may take several business days.
>
> Thanks again for your email.
> ______­­
>
> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>
> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>
> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>
> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>
>
> ---------- Original  message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 15:13:26 -0400
> Subject: YO Mr Higgs So much for the ethics of your Acting Integrity
> Commissioner N'esy Pas?
> To: premier@gnb.ca, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
> robert.gauvin@gnb.ca, hugh.flemming@gnb.ca,
> andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,  brian.gallant@gnb.ca,
> robert.mckee@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca,
> Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca,
> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca,  michelle.conroy@gnb.ca,
> bruce.northrup@gnb.ca, bruce.fitch@gnb.c, mike.holland@gnb.ca, andre
> andre@jafaust.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Frank.McKenna@td.com,
> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
> premier@ontario.ca, scott.moe@gov.sk.ca, andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca,
> maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca, Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpOY5yzB9-8
>
> New Brunswick Ombudsman Charles Murray on report regarding The
> Restigouche Hostipal Centre!
> 119 views
> Charles Leblanc
> Published on Feb 8, 2019
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca>
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000
> Subject: You wished to speak with me
> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails over the
> years.
>
>
> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and
> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in response to
> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a
> productive use of either of our time.
>
>
> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to communicate
> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will be
> given due consideration.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Charles Murray
>
> Ombud NB
>
> Acting Integrity Commissioner
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 03:09:18 -0300
> Subject: So your buddy Charles Murray has my documents now N'esy Pas
> Chucky Baby?
> To: charles.murray@gnb.ca, Charles.McAllister@snb.ca, premier
> <premier@gov.ab.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, oldmaison
> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, sallybrooks25
> <sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca>, blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kim.macpherson@gnb.ca
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, briangallant10
> <briangallant10@gmail.com>, execdirgen <execdirgen@nbliberal.ca>
>
> CBC
> 3 new watchdogs appointed
> Premier names child and youth advocate, official languages
> commissioner and ombudsman
> CBC News Posted: Jun 14, 2013 3:24 PM
>
>
> The new ombudsman is Charles Murray, a civil servant and former
> political assistant to one-time Tory MP Elsie Wayne and to former PC
> cabinet minister Brad Green.
>
> "I am confident that their experience and education will help them to
> carry out their respective duties effectively," said Premier David
> Alward.
>
> He said Murray's appointment is not political.
>
> YEA RIGHT DAVEY BABY
>
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbDs3NUo-Nk
>
> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2526023-DAMOSIntegrity-yea-right.-txt.pdf
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Evelyn Greene
> To: charles.mcallister@snb.ca ; blaine.higgs@gnb.ca ;
> kim.macpherson@gnb.ca ; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ;
> david.alward@gnb.ca ; charles.murray@gnb.ca ; madeleine.dube@gnb.ca ;
> ken.ross@gnb.ca
> Cc: don.forestell@gnb.ca ; dhashey@coxandpalmer.com
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 6:32 PM
> Subject: RE: Ambulance New Brunswick Inc.
>
>
> Dear Mr. McAllister:  Ambulance New Brunswick Inc. is also CROWN
> CORPORATION UNDER PART III OF THE PUBLIC LABOR RELATIONS ACT, AND WHY
> WOULD NOT NOT KNOW THAT.  PLEASE ADVISE.  ALSO, MS. RENEE LAFOREST
> DOES NOT GET BACK TO ME.  DO YOU HAVE HER EMAIL.  MY FRIEND SALLY AND
> I WENT THERE TODAY AND WAS TOLD THAT SHE WAS IN A MEETING.  SO WHO
> MAKES THE ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC TO SEE THE BOOKS AS PER THE
> PUBLIC RIGHTS AS TAXPAYERS?
>
>
> EVELYN GREENE  ALSO, THE LETTERS PATENT ARE NOT WITNESSED AS PER THE
> REGULATIONS UNDER THE COMPANY'S ACT.  COULD YOU COMMENT ABOUT THAT.
> WHY WOULD IT HAVE GONE THRU YOUR OFFICE WITHOUT PROPER ATTENTION TO
> THE LAWYER SIGNING ON BEHALF OF THE CO. THAT ALL IS IN COMPLIANCE
> WHICH IT ISN'T. LOOK AT THE DOCUMENTS FOR MEDAVIE EMS AND NB EMS AND
> TELL ME IF THEY WERE WITNESSED PROPERLY?
>
> SEND THIS ON THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS, INCLUDING DAVID HASHEY'S CLIENT,
> DONALD PETERS AND CHARLES MURRAY WHO BY WAY OF THE LEGISLATION ARE IN
> CONFLICT BY BEING ON THE BOARDS.  PLEASE CONFIRM?  I WANT TO KNOW HOW
> TO ACCESS THE BOOKS OF AMBULANCE N.B. INC. WHICH IS A PUBLIC
> CORPORATION WHICH IS PARTNERED WITH ANOTHER CO. N.B. EMS WHICH IS
> PARTNERED WITH MEDAVIE EMS MAKING THEM ALL SUBSIDIARIES AND ALL
> SHAREHOLDERS OF THE SUBSIDIARIES CAN GET LOAN GUARANTEES AND OTHER
> BENEFITS BUT WHY WAS THIS DEAL NOT PUT OUT FOR A COST ANALYSIS AND
> BIDDING AS PER THE RULES?
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> From: Charles.McAllister@snb.ca
> To: evelyngreene@live.ca
> Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:49:31 -0400
> Subject: Ambulance New Brunswick Inc.
>
>
> This is further to our discussion today.
>
>
>
> As indicated, this company is incorporated and subject to the
> Companies Act. You can access the Act at the following link:
>
> http://laws.gnb.ca/en/BrowseTitle
>
>
>
> The company’s head office location is as follows: Department  of
> Health, 520  King Street, Fredericton. You had asked me exactly where
> at 520 King Street is the head office. An ANB official indicates it is
> at the fourth floor of 520 King Street –which is occupied as well by
> offices of the Dept of Health.
>
>
>
> You indicated you wish to attend and examined certain records of ANB.
> I have provided you with a contact name: Renee LaForest (phone number
> 453-3759). It is our understanding she is the secretary-treasurer of
> ANB.
>
>
>
> I have indicated under the Companies Act, the relevant provisions
> regarding access is as follows:
>
>
>
> BOOKS OF THE COMPANY
>
> 104The company shall cause books to be kept by the secretary, or by
> some other officer or agent specially charged with that duty, wherein
> shall be kept recorded
>
> (a)a copy of the letters patent incorporating the company, and any
> supplementary letters patent, and of all by-laws of the company;
>
> (b)the names alphabetically arranged of all persons who are or have
> been shareholders;
>
> (c)the address and calling of every such person while a shareholder,
> as far as can be ascertained;
>
> (d)the number of shares of stock held by each shareholder;
>
> (e)the amounts paid in and remaining unpaid respectively on the stock
> of each shareholder;
>
> (f)all transfers of stocks, with the date and other particulars of the
> transfer, and the date of the entry thereof;
>
> (g)the names, addresses and callings of all persons who are or have
> been directors of the company, with the several dates at which each
> became or ceased to be a director;
>
> (h)minutes of all meetings of shareholders, directors and executive
> committee.
>
> R.S., c.33, s.103.
>
> 105(1)A book called the register of transfers shall be provided, and
> in the book shall be entered the particulars of every transfer of
> shares in the capital of the company.
>
> 105(2)One or more branch registers of transfers may be kept at places
> appointed by the directors.
>
> 105(3)Every transfer made at a branch registry shall be forthwith
> reported to the head office of the company.
>
> R.S., c.33, s.104.
>
> 106(1)Such books, with the exception of the minute books of the
> directors and executive committee, shall, during reasonable business
> hours of every day except Sundays and holidays, be kept open at the
> head office of the company or at such place as may be authorized under
> subsection (2) or (3) of this section, for the inspection of
> shareholders and creditors of the company and their personal
> representatives, and of any judgment creditor of a shareholder.
>
> 106(2)The Lieutenant-Governor in Council upon cause being shown to him
> may by order designate some other office of the company in the
> Province as the place where its books may be kept for the purposes of
> subsection (1).
>
> 106(3)Where an agent with an established place of business in the
> Province is appointed by the company for the purpose of recording the
> transfer of its shares, the book, in which are recorded the
> particulars mentioned in paragraphs 104(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f), may
> be kept at the agent’s place of business in the Province where the
> register of transfers is kept.
>
> 106(4)Every such shareholder, creditor or personal representative or
> judgment creditor may make extracts therefrom.
>
>
>
> The definition section of the Act states as follows:
>
> “shareholder” means every subscriber to, or holder of, stock in the
> company, and includes every member of a company without share capital
> and the personal representatives of the shareholder;
>
>
>
> As discussed with you, you do not seem to fall within the scope of
> section 106(1) to entitle you to see the records of ANB that are
> mentioned in section 104 of the Act.
>
>
>
> You have expressed the view you are entitled to see the above records
> and perhaps other records, notwithstanding that you do not fall
> presently within s 106(1). To what extent you have other legal rights
> to see the above records (or other records), you will need to pursue
> that viewpoint with ANB, not with myself.
>
>
>
> Charles McAllister
>
> Director- Companies Act
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Evelyn Greene
> To: ndesrosiers@ccla.org ; david.raymond.amos@gmail.com ;
> lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ;
> sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca ; hubert.lacroix@cbc.ca ; andy.campbell@ctv.ca
> ; steve.murphy@ctv.ca ; w5@ctv.ca ; russomanno@wsgalaw.com ;
> kim.macpherson@gnb.ca ; heather.webb@gnb.ca ; david.alward@gnb.ca ;
> marie.claudeblais@gnb.ca ; madeleine.dube@gnb.ca ;
> charles.murray@gnb.ca
> Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:53 PM
> Subject: FW: Disclosure still outstanding
>
>
> I am sending this to you folks as a beginning of some information you
> need to know.  On May 13, 2011, the day I was beaten up by police at
> Ambulance New Brunswick on 24 Harold Doherty Dr., in Fredericton, I
> had originally agreed to meet with Charles LeBlanc for the first at
> the front of the Legislature.  I had spoken with my MLA Brian
> MacDonald on the 12th and I made him aware that I was doing the
> interview due to him and others not looking into the corruption.
>
> On May 13, 2011, I later learned that Premier David Alward and Health
> Minister Madeleine Dube had gone to Moncton or St. John and I believe
> it was to open an ambulance or to do with something about a new part
> of the hospital.  I sort of flagged this in mind because I thought
> this is convenient that they are both out of town when I got beaten.
>
> I had arranged a few days earlier to meet Charles LeBlanc however,
> that morning I wrote him an email and cancelled saying I was not well
> which was true as is in the police records when they charged me.
> However, the timeline to deliver the Right to Information was up that
> day and in the afternoon I forced myself to go downtown and serve
> them.  I first went to Cox and Palmer Law Firm, then to the Court
> House to see Craig Carleton and then to the N.B. Police Commission and
> secretary/receptionist Julie Williams accepted the documents.
>
> Then I went to Ambulance N.B. where they seemingly were expecting me.
> I felt then as I do today that they were call by someone and were
> expecting me.
>
> 1. On the day of that Friday, May 13, 2011, I had an email from
> Charles LeBlanc saying all of a sudden his blog was shut down.
> However, as I reported at the time, I smelled a rat and I told Mr.
> LeBlanc this and later after that day I asked to do an interview in
> front of the Justice Bld. and Charles LeBlanc refused, saying he was
> interviewing Mayor Woodside at City Hall.  Then there was this big ten
> minute or more interview on Charles' blog with the Mayor and the Mayor
> was saying things like, "When I pick you up in the winter and give you
> a drive ........ (this was to Charles).  I smelled a rat then as I do
> not and I sent Charles a letter and copied all government heads saying
> he would make the perfect stooge for the mayor and others.
>
> Look at the next few emails, please.
>
> It was Sally Brooks who wanted me to meet with her and Charles LeBlanc
> at the coffee shop last week and I told Sally I did not trust him.
> She said he has ADHD and is harmless and that when he was in court he
> could hardly talk.  I told her that this did not compute in my mind,
> because he can stand in front of the police station on another day and
> blurt the hell out of himself yelling things at the police and writing
> all this stuff on the blog.  Sally said just come and see.  That
> morning, Charles LeBlanc could hardly look me in the fact and I told
> Sally that and she said she noticed but she felt it was nothing.  In
> fact, I gave him $10 for coffee and he took our picture and put it on
> the blog.  Howevr, he wanted to only put things on the blog which was
> really Sally and My blog but he wanted to control what went in and
> out.  For ex. he did not want to print anything about the letter I
> wrote the Police Commission and I copied other people, including David
> Amos who to this date, I have not yet met.  However, David does speak
> the truth to my mind.  He may be blunt, but he says it like it is.  I
> told Sally I thought Charles and David were friends behind closed
> doors, but I have now changed that idea.  For ex. at no time did
> Charles LeBlanc ever tell me about Andre Murray's plight with the same
> police officer who beat me, Cst. Nancy Rideout nor did he mention any
> of the facts, but knew my story.  I just recently learned of Andre
> Murray and the common denomination we have in common:  "police abuse".
>
> Please read the next few emails and see what you think.  Then on
> Friday, Sally said she met with Charles at his house and she was late
> to meet me for lunch.  She did not mention that they were walking on
> the street as has been written on our blog.  However, Sally told me to
> just let Charles do the whole process of the blog and not send
> anything to him but brief comments as Charles is not well enough to
> understand my topics of police commission willfull blindness.  I said
> okay, but she did not say they were together on the streets nor
> mention anything like that, just that she was late because of doing
> errands.
>
> Please remember that nothing about my story was ever written in the
> Brunswick Newspaper owned by irving and this is the case with Mr.
> Andre Murray.  Why?  Why would Jacques Poitras refuse to write
> anything and basically threw me out of the CBC a couple weeks ago,
> saying I wrote his boss, Hubert Lacroix.  I asked Mr. Lacrois since
> that time if Mr. Poitras has any connection with the female crown
> prosecutor, Ms. Poitras in Bathurst, N.B.
>
> Then someone wrote recently that our finance minister, mr. Higgs used
> to work for Irvings.
>
> I have continually asked if Irving or his son, Kenneth, who up and
> left the Irvings shortly after my beating took place and went to
> Kinross Gold may have anything to do with Ambulance N.B. and the big
> contract its partner, Medavie EMS which is a private, for-profit co.
> that has common shares and because it is a private co., the
> shareholders do not need to be mentioned at corporate records due to
> N.B. legislative statute under Private Act and corporations.  For ex.,
> Medavie EMS partnered with NB EMS and that too is partnered with
> Ambulance N.B.  They won a lucrative bid for sending a fleet of
> ambulances from Canada to Trinidad for $90 million a year.  Was it in
> our newspaper.  I did not see it.  Also, I have shared with many of
> you the corporate documents showing irregularities in the letters
> patent and the incorporation of Medavie EMS which is signed by a
> lawyer in Halifax who is with the law firm, Stewart McKelvey who
> represents Ambulance N.B. Inc.  I wrote the Trinidad Government and I
> got hold of the paper from Trinidad, the TNT Mirror saying the
> Attorney General was concerned about irregularities in the contract
> and Medavie EMS had written asking what was the hold up.  I then
> forwarded my story about getting beaten up at Ambulance NB Inc. and
> there was no investigation albeit I informed the Premier, David Alward
> and all other ministers.  It is my understanding too that in order for
> a P3 partnership that EMS set up with Ambulance NB it is supposed to
> be okayed with the Cabinet.  In fact the Minister has to sign off on
> it.  However, it was signed by a different Minister, Jack Keir, on
> behalf of Minister Greg Byrne who Mr. Keir said was out of the country
> at the time.  I asked the secretaries at Service NB who Jack Keir is
> and they did not know, but I later found out and called Mr. Keir.  He
> told me he is no longer the minister and did not know what he was
> signing, saying he is a North shore, St. John New Brunswicker and not
> a lawyer.  I have the documentation and it is questionable.  I sent
> this information to Finance Minister Blaine Higgs and he did not
> respond.  I went to see Kim MacPherson, our auditor general and she
> said she had no obligation to report it.  She said she knew nothing
> about this P3 deal and she would not talk further, telling her
> secretary, Heather, to tell me she could not help me in my plight for
> justice and almost being beaten to death while wearing an implanted
> heart defibrillator and reported sick to the paramedic station.  This
> is documented by others, not just me.
>
> Then I checked the records for Ambulance N.B. Inc. and find that the
> lawyer for the Minister of Health, Charles Murray is on the Board of
> Directors, as is Donald J. Peters the CEO of Horizon Health Network
> also known as Regional Health Authority B and is over the Dr. Everett
> Chalmers Hospital where my problems first stemmed.  It is scary
> really.
>
> Pls. read on.
>
> Evelyn Greene
>
> Wait for the next few emails and then let me know what you think of
> all of this please, especially the Canadian Civil Liberties Assoc. who
> know I contacted them long ago about my plight and they said they
> could not help.
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 09:08:19 -0800
> From: sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca
> Subject: Re: Disclosure still outstanding
> To: evelyngreene@live.ca
>
>
>
>
> brilliant!
>
> This is really good, really concise and absolutely puts the pressure
> on. Well done Evelyn.
>
> STOP PRESS: LAXATIVE SALES BOTTOM OUT IN NEW BRUNSWICK!
> From: Evelyn Greene <evelyngreene@live.ca>
> To: christopher.lavigne@gnb.ca
> Cc: luc.labonte@gnb.ca; pierre.castonguay@gnb.ca;
> madeleine.dube@gnb.ca; justice.comments@gnb.ca;
> sallybrooks25@yahoo.ca; wishart.john@dailygleaner.com;
> wylie1@nb.sympatico.ca; mboudreau@stu.ca; w5@ctv.ca;
> hubert.lacroix@cbc.ca; jacques.poitras@cbc.ca; info@atlanticalarm.com;
> keith.ball@gnb.ca; kimthomas@ag.gov.tt
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 12:30:37 PM
> Subject: Disclosure still outstanding
>
>
>
> Mr. Lavigne:
>
> I still have not received confirmation that you went back to the
> police and Ambulance N.B. to obtain the rest of the answers to the
> questions you posed to them in your letter of Dec. 2011 about the CCTV
> evidence and the Audio evidence.
>
> (1)  Surely you are not going to accept the perjured evidence of Robin
> O'Hara and go ahead now and subpoena the main information straight
> from Atlantic alarm and sound right off the original data base or
> where it is initially (originally) recorded?  You need this according
> to the head of the company.
>
> (2)  Where is the evidence of the 911 call from Ambulance N.B. to the
> police.
>
> (3)  Did you get the statement from the Ambulance N.B. and the Police
> why the police were called in the first place when I was sitting
> quietly, and felt sick, and was no harm to myself or anyone else.  Why
> was that called placed to the police and why did four police officers
> and four cars arrive when it was not even an emergency?  Do you not
> see that my Charter rights were violated to a high (not low or
> moderate degree) ending up with me having bodily injury and no police
> report made out that I have seen, and as per the rules of the Police
> Act, when personal injury happenes to a person in custody?
>
> (4)  Why did the police investigate themselves when I made a complaint
> of abuse against them to the Chief of Police?  Who investigated this
> and where are their reports?
>
> (5)  Where is the report of NCO Horseman when he took my complaints
> and my statement?  What did he say?
>
> (6)  I need the answers requested from David Banks, the dispatch head
> at the police station for all 911 calls.
>
> (7)  Did you ask the police to explain the different dispatchers on
> the call and the questions posed to the crown about the video
> tampering evidence supplied by Ms. Brooks?
>
> (8)  Judge Richards had said to prosecutor Rose Campbell that Greene
> needs a lawyer and she was looking into, but then a new Judge (Judge
> Jackson) came on the case and I told him about this but he did not
> look into it.
>
> (9)  Where are the answers to the other questions you posed such as
> why Constable Rideout was on the phone while in the police car taking
> me to Headquarters and reporting that I was loud and out of control
> but this was not picked up on the audio of the call.
>
> (10)Why were the ambulance dispatched to 24 Doherty Drive for almost 8
> minutes after I was taken to headquarters?  I need their reports as to
> why and what they were doing there?  I have asked Fire Chief Toole who
> did not respond.  You need to get this information even if it is by
> subpoena.
>
> (11)  Where are the phone records of all calls made to Ambulance N.B.
> at 24 Harold Doherty Dr. on the 13th of May?  Were any from Cox and
> Palmer or from the NB Police Commission or the Court House.
>
> (12)  I sent you recent conflicting statements from representatives
> from Atlantic Alarm and Sound.  The owner had obviously not
> anticipated that I would contact the service provider who obviously
> told the truth.  What are you doing about that, if anything?  And if
> nothing, why not, please explain?
> (
> (13)  You have the capacity to send the CCTV video to the crime lab in
> Halifax (RCMP) so why has this not yet been done which would add their
> input to this matter?  Are you not wanting to know the truth here Mr.
> Lavigne because it would most likely cost less than $500 and your are
> spending far more than that on continuing on with this bogus charge at
> great expense to the public purse and the court's time?
>
> (14).  Much other evidence is sent to the crime lab for analyses so
> why is this case different?  Please explain that.
>
> (15).  The McNeil case was decided by the Supreme Court of Canada and
> that includes all disclosure must be given to the Defendant,
> regardless of privacy issues or anything else.  Again what are you
> doing to get the original documentation of the CCTV video.  The
> service co-ordinator said if one camera is not working, then the
> others take over.  There are four cameras surrounding the paramedic
> door at Ambulance N.B. Paramedic Bay and clearly picked up other
> movement that day, but did have four minute splitting here and there.
> The pictures that do take are for the most part visible so it is not a
> case of the camera set low for visibility issues?
>
> (16)  The expert from Outreach Productions wrote down that a police
> officer magically appears from no where on the CCTV camera?  What did
> you learn about that?
>
> I need answers to these questions and I am asking once more to review
> my file in its entirety and have the times set so that the photocopies
> can be made at that time.  I asked Simonne of the Prosecutor's office
> for copies and she said I would have to come back.  When I came back,
> she had left for home early and when I picked up the documents early
> the next week, many of the documents I requested to be photocopies
> were not included.  There was one email or report that had the word
> dizzy typed out like this "d-i-z-z-y".  I suspect that was one of the
> officers or paramedics who reported I told them I felt dizzy that day
> which i did.  Why would this be concealed now and
>
> (17)  Have you now reviewed all of the evidence, including the CCTV
> video and audio and my doctor's notes and the notes I submitted
> regarding the officer who was let off a charge in Ont. as he has
> hypoglycemia which I have and is in the police reports?
>
> (18)  You know that Cst. Rideout left my angina meds. (nitro) in my
> car with my purse and would not let me have it before going to
> headquarters and then $150 went missing out of my purse when it was
> returned so that I would not have the cash on hand to get my impounded
> car.  I also had to call a taxi for a drive back across the river to
> where my car was impounded and for some reason their debit machines
> were not working.
>
> (19)  I have a lifeline contract with Phillips Lifeline and I have
> told them of this issue.  My lifeline box which is connected to the
> hospital has not worked for some time and lifeline calls me every
> night at 7 p.m. to ensure I am okay.  If they do not hear form me,
> they call the ambulance.  Not long ago, I did not hear the phone ring
> and they sent the ambulance and fire truck.  I went to the door and
> said I did not hear the phone ring and I was listenening for it and
> told them I was okay.  Phillips lifeline then called the paramedics
> and was told by the paramedics "that she (Greene) was not home.  I
> asked Lifeline to document this information as it is just one part of
> the total picture of lies and corruption from Ambulance employeess.
> Your job, I believe, is to ask whey they lied to lifeline?  It is
> documented so you could contact them directly.
>
> I look forward to receiving your response to this letter which I will
> drop off at the Crown's office next week in hard copy so that if you
> fail to address these questions, I will use them later for appeal
> purposes as is the case with all the documentation I asked for to date
> and did not receive.  Also perphas you can ask why I have not been
> allowed a lawyer as per Judge Richards question about that to
> Prosecutor Rose Campbell?
>
> Evelyn Greene
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> To: <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; <T.J.Burke@gnb.ca>; <john.foran@gnb.ca>;
> <Wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca>; <frederic.loiseau@fredericton.ca>;
> <tony.whalen@gnb.ca>
> Cc: <abel.leblanc@gnb.ca>; <jack.keir@gnb.ca>; <premier@gnb.ca>;
> <Jeannot.VOLPE@gnb.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 4:08 AM
> Subject: Hells Angels EH Chucky Leblanc? When was the last time you or
> the Irvings or the RCMP saw one ride a Panhead alone?
>
>
> Remember these old emails of yours Chucky Baby? Post this photo of my
> nasty arse I Double Dog Dare Ya to Frenchy. At least my baby boy's
> little arse is far more innocent looking  than Shawny Baby Graham's
> black eye EH Frenchy?
>
> Small wonder that I didn't allow him anywhere near and of Cardinal
> Law's nasty Boyz in Beantown EH?
>
> You must I figured out by now that I hate diddlers and especiallly the
> ones who pretend to be oh so pious and above us all. By now you must
> at least understand one of the reasons I supported Byron Prior years
> ago in his quest for justice but I was always more concerned about
> about what he knows about Johnny Crosbie, the Haliburton dudes and our
> dead fish. But you don't know the first thing about that do ya? It
> must be because not one of your five brians knows how to read Nest Pas?
>
> HELL ANGELS FROM MONTREAL LOOKING FOR CHARLES LEBLANC????
> by Charles LeBlanc Saturday, Jun. 12, 2004 at 11:26 AM
>
> Thursday morning, I showed up at the Legislature to use the computer
> at the Library.
> I was told by security that two rough looking individuals walked
> through the doors and asked for a Charles Leblanc?
> They described the guys as rough looking and one of them had a long
> gray beard with a leather jacket!
> At first, I believe it was the Hell Angels coming down from Montreal
> for a hit on Charles.
>
> Hours later, I seen my bigot buddy Matthew Glenn and he was in front
> of the Legislature with his blowhorn.
> For you people who don't know the bigot? He's the one who started the
> Anglo Society. I seen him preaching to three young kids and of course
> I butt in and said - Hey Bigot??? Why don't you bigot go home?
>
> Minutes later, we were approached by two guys and they asked politely
> –Where can we locate a Charles LeBlanc???
> In a matter of seconds, the bigot quickly pointed at me. I said to
> myself - Ohhh?? Thanks a lot Bigot!!!
>
> At the end? It was a guy named David Amos and I guess that he's
> running at an independent in the riding of Fundy Royal. The guy have
> been living in the area of Boston and he's been following my updates
> on the internet. I'm telling you that the information highway is a
> great way to spread the message to the rest of the world!
>
> We talked for around 30 minutes and it was nice to see the bigot, me
> and David Amos together debating our own little concern issue. We all
> have our own issues and it's too bad that we cannot unite and fight
> but that's the way Canadians do things. They remind silent until the
> Government really pissed them all and go out and vote the party in
> power out of office.
>
> What did I tell you people in the past? Someone is
> going to crack up one of these days and I know for a
> fact the area targeted is going to be the Legislature.
>
> Two weeks later you wrote this Chucky
>
> "There's always undercovers cops around but only when the House is in
> session. As God as my witness I hope nothing happens but it's just a
> matter of time till someone is push over the edge.
>
> I guess a guy name David Amos was shown the door yesterday at the
> Legislature. This guy is running as an Independent candidate in the
> riding of Fundy Royal. I met the guy over the net and he has a beef
> with our political bureaucrats. I admire people fighting for what they
> believe in but you can't get carried away.
>
> I guess in this case? He wanted to speak from the Gallery and that's a
> big faux pas!"
>
> After you continued to make fun of me throughout the summer of 2004
> amongst the other things I forwarded to you was an old joke about my
> drunken Irish Catholic in laws in Beantown. N'est Pas? It must have
> pissed you off as I tortured the Hell out of your buddy Bernie Richard
> the nasty Ombudsman too before my wife and I and a lawyer visited the
> Police Commission. In response you sent photos of your old soon to be
> dead dog comparing it to me. I laughed the photos were taken by your
> Fake Left friends and emailed to you. Your big Faux Pas was that you
> were so dumb you sent me their email address too. Thus in a wink of an
> eye I knew and had the proof of who was behind you and pulling your
> strings. Do they remember my conversations with them last year? I do.
> The question is did I record them as they made liars out of themselves.
> LOL EH? Stay tuned Frenchy.
>
> When you saw that I was falsely imprisoned in Boston on October 1st,
> 2004 you largely shut up and never responded to my emails over the
> course of the past four years because you knew what I did with them
> after that. As the old Joke goes many a true word is said in jest and
> you did not like other people reading your nonsense to me. Correct?
>
> Years after that old joke I sent you went around. The Yankees made a
> movie starring Jack Nicholson based on Whitey's life and times. It is
> entitled "The Departed". Perhaps the drunken Catholic in you should
> rent it sometime with your welfare dimes. Listen closely to what ol
> Jacky Boy says about your Church and their very corrupt doings.
>
> My Keith ancestors and I were not alone in our contempt towards your
> church EH? Did your Mama tell you that the Keiths came out of northern
> Germany to settle in Scotland in order to escape your nasty Popes and
> their cohorts? Do you understand that after the shit was settled in
> 1755 the Frenchmen in Canada who did not wish to be shipped out to
> other French holdings swore allegiance to the British Crown? What
> makes you dudes think that you can change the deal now especially in
> light of the fact every Indian demands that we hold up to all the
> other deals our ancestors made long before any of us were born? The
> Scottish part of you should shove that Acadian flag along with its
> flagpole up your French arse Chucky Baby. Is that clear or COR enough
> for you?
>
> To rub it in I will tell you that after my father died my Mama married
> Loyd Nickerson a member of the COR Party who was also the Chief
> Electoral Officer of New Brunswick. One big reason I ran in Fundy is
> that there are damn few French men registered to vote and not many
> Catholic churches in Kings County. I  ain't a bigot. I love French
> Catholic women. Hell I was the first of my family that I know of who
> married a Catholic woman.  It is their greedy Catholic brothers that I
> hate be they either French or Irish or whatever. I believe they call
> this shit conflict of colours Orange versus Green  not biker bullshit
> as you claimed about me. I don't wear Biker colours I where the
> colours of My Clan and I have many friends.  Quite possibly many more
> true French ones than you do. How can you have true friends at all if
> they can't trust you. Do your even believe yourself and your obvious
> Bullshit?
>
> How do you sleep at night knowing yourself as you do? Why do you
> make fun of a fellow Maritimer whose family was destroyed by the
> very people you pretend to complain about? Never forget I am from
> Dorchester Frenchy and Ivan Cormier (AKA the Beast) was on my paper
> route and I liked and admired him and his friends and their art
> particularly Killer Karl Krupp and the Cuban. Their Bullshit was flat
> out entertaining and not malicious at all. Yours definitely is
> malicious and not funny at all. No Class Bobby Bass had way more class
> in his worst fart than you do in your whole soul. I must say venting
> some of my venom towards you is definitely good for my savage soul. As
> a southern friend of mine would say when I was feeling mean years ago
> "Ya gots to get the poison out or ya die just don't spit out in my
> direction. Save it for somebody who deserves it."
>
> BTW, the man who sold me that old Panhead that your cop buddies in Fat
> Fred City stole from me last summer was a of French Cathlolic heritage
> out of Quebec. He was a really good friend of mine and I named my bike
> after him and his wife. His family moved from Quebec to Vermont about
> a hundred years ago when your greedy priests demanded that the poor
> folks build another big fancy church across the road from the one they
> just built. So they crossed the border, built a simple church and went
> about the pursuit of happiness in a country that is supposed to keep
> church and state separate and have only one official language. Go try
> your crybaby French welfare nonsense in New Hampshire or Vermont
> sometime Chucky and see if you come back in one piece. I would pay
> money I don't have to watch that circus tent unfold. The Pope's
> mission is to keep you dudes poor and dumb. Get it Frenchy? If not ask
> your hero Spinksy Baby to argue me as if I care what any of you think.
> I would argue him right after that chickenshit IDs himself and proves
> to me and everyone else that he is not Brent Taylor.
>
> I Double Dog Dare Ya to post this email in his blog. I am posting it
> deep in your buddy the Gypsy's blog before I post it in mine. That is
> if he has still maintained his integrity after all my stress tests
> last week. You dudes kissing the "The General Blogger" nasty arse was
> too much for me to stand. It was too funny that T. J Burke blocked my
> defence of your blatant stupidity N'est Pas?
>
> BTW one of my wife's cousins Robert T. Kickham you remember the evil
> ex banker who turned into the evil priest is still Cardinal O'Malley's
> secretary in Beantown as far as I know. Why don't you sing their
> priases on the Internet this Easter and ask that all the corrupt
> Catholics to pray that I be crucified by the RCMP soon? I must ask you
> Chucky why did you support diddlers for years and then suddenly turn
> coat and support Byron Prior's pursuit of justice after ignoring the
> fact that I introduced you two to each other four years ago?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> P.S.  For the record Chucky this joke is still funny to me and my arse
> and my balls are as big as ever. Ain't it funny how time slips away
> and yet some things remain the same? Everybody knows I find you
> contemptible and why that is so. I do wish you a long life so that you
> can recall all your sins countless times with your five brains.
> However I must turn the page my personal history and go back to how I
> once was before I am dust once more. Life is too short to argue with
> liars for long or dance with ugly women so to speak. My Baby Boy turns
> 18 this year thus my job of raising him is largely done. He and his
> sisters are my best piece work. They all have the records of all my
> work including this email. (Obviously I sent it from one of my other
> email accounts to one of my son's for safe keeping before I save it
> digitally and print it as well.) Before long my son will be the Chief
> of our Clan and it will be his job to defend my integrity and my deeds
> for the benefit of my seed as I grin proudly from the grave. He is
> quite simply the best man I ever met and truly a man of his word.
> Never underestimate my darling daughters they are tigers in their own
> right and I raised them not to take shit from anyone. They may prove
> to be the most trouble for the unethical smiling bastards that are the
> powers that be right now.
>
> Between men I asked my son to piss on the graves of my enemies someday
> if I could not do so and he promised that he would. I would not ask my
> little Darlins to do such a thing out of respect to their gender. As
> part of my Blood Feud you made the list Chucky Baby. Your Mama will
> understand why I told my son that in order to pay proper respect to
> from Whence We Came he really should drink a lot of Keiths beer before
> he does so. Whereas neither of us like the taste of beer I will leave
> him to his own chosen poison as long as he enjoys the in and out of it all.
>
> As for me I plan to Rest in Peace in Dorchester someday happy in
> knowing the fact that  I have left at least four very decent folk
> behind me on this planet. My skull like Yorick's of old will grin like
> Hell thinking about the fact that the prevailing winds will blow the
> smell of my rotting corpse towards your old stomping grounds where you
> no doubt will be buried without any children at all to visit your
> bones. If you do have kids or an ex wife or two I never read where you
> admitted it. Dudes like you and your fans such as Dean Roger Ray and
> the Depupty Dog Robert F. O'Meara are too selfish to make decent
> loving fathers anyway. If there truly is a Hell like in your dreams
> Chucky, I will look for you there. I suspect the Devil would promote
> me to Sergeant at Arms and give me a Black Rod as soon as I landed in
> order to cram it up your nasty French arse. I have no doubt its hard
> to get good help in Hell and Satan will need a lot of help pounding on
> all the evil priests, bankers, lawyers, cops, politicians and the
> liars like you who supported their malice in this wonderful old world.
> N'est Pas?
>
> Can one of your five brains tell that you have an ethical pigheaded
> Maritimer you hates you with a very justifiable passion Chucky Baby?
> Whereas your buddy Shawny Baby Graham enjoys jokes maybe he will enjoy
> this one since it is on you. It is not my joke and I give credit where
> credit is due. I hate it when you or your buddies Dean Roger Ray or
> the Yankee Stevey Boy Erickson steal my words and claim them as their
> own while you try to impeach my character at the same time. If anyone
> doubts that I am the first Chief of the Amos Clan who has every right
> and duty to defend it fiercely perhaps he should query the dockets of
> the US District Court in Concord New Hampshire if he knows how.
> Whereas everything in the Catholic's heaven and hell is down in three
> I file My Clan's declaration of Independence for the Keiths within
> three affidavits in three different matters. I do not file nuisance
> lawsuits as Yankee blogger hero claims. Danny Boy can post the photo
> of my nasty arse, my boy and my panhead on the Internet with my
> knowledge and assent and my blessings and thanx as well. However I
> still own the rights to it. I need it for my book about you Fake Left
> Creeps on Fat Fred city and elsewhere. It may be the only thing that I
> leave my kids that could be worth something someday. Maritimers do
> love juicy gossip N'est Pas?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
> Date:    Fri, 18 Oct 2002 02:02:22 -0400
> From:    Rollo Tomasi rollotomasi@COMCAST.NET
> Subject: Bingo-Playing Golden-Age Golden Glove Catholic Gang Members
> Lay Waste to Bay State
>
> Boston - First it was financial scandals, followed by Notre Dame
> football teams that really sucked, then pederast priests. Now it appears
> that bingo, the fourth and some would say most important pillar of the
> Roman Catholic Church, is on the verge of self-destruction.
>
> Yesterday members of the Boston Police Department SWAT team, two
> divisions of the Massachusetts National Guard and the US Army's elite
> Delta Force had to be called in to stop a riot that had broken out at the
> Whitey Bulger Memorial Senior Citizen Center at St. Bernadette's
> Cathedral in the so-called "Southie" section of Beantown.
>
> "Southie," populated mostly by unemployed drunk Irish immigrants,
> became well-known in the 1970s as a symbol of protest against racial
> integration, and according to statistics released by the US Census Bureau,
> contains the highest concentration of dim-witted white people in the world.
>
> Although details at this point are sketchy, it appears that the cause of
> the
> riot was dissatisfaction over new rules limiting bingo participants to one
> colostomy bag per person.
>
> "I know these old-timers can play bingo all night," said Seamus O'Connor,
> director of activities at the Bulger Center, "But, my god, seven colostomy
> bags?!  C'mon, we all know they were smuggling in contraband and
> controlled substances.  Heck, we even found one hastily discarded bag
> filled with two gallons of Curacao.  I mean, give me a break.  Who pisses
> blue anyway?"
>
> The Diocese of Boston officially denied any responsibility for the riot.
> John Cardinal O'Donnell, Archbishop of the Diocese, angrily attacked the
> press for what he termed "sloppy reporting by biased reporters who have
> been duped by Protestant agitprop."
>
> Cardinal O'Donnell assumed a defiant posture as he met with members of
> the press.  "I'm sick and tired of all the anti-Irish prejudice in
> American society.
> You read the newspapers and you'd think that all we Irish do is drink,
> fight
> and whore around." O'Donnell then chugged a bottle of Guinness Stout,
> pinched his secretary on her posterior, made two fists with his hands and
> said,
> "And I'll lick any man who says otherwise."
> __
> by William Grim
> (c) Copyright 2002 Broken Newz
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: charlie leblanc
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Friday, February 11, 2005 3:49 PM
> Subject: Re: Good Day Charlie say het to Andy for me
>
>
> merci
>
> David Amos <motomaniac_02186@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ;
> oldmaison1@yahoo.ca ; wayne.STEEVES@gnb.ca ; Cadman.C@parl.gc.ca ;
> Cotler.I@parl.gc.ca ; Easter.W@parl.gc.ca ; Efford.J@parl.gc.ca ;
> Graham.B@parl.gc.ca ; 'Stephen Harper' ; Jack Layton ;
> MacAulay.L@parl.gc.ca ; McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Parrish.C@parl.gc.ca
> ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; Zed.P@parl.gc.ca ;
> info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca ; justice@gov.nl.ca ; Canadian Justice Review Board
> ; J. D. Kuntz ; webmaster@canadalawcourts.com ; Brent Taylor ;
> gbudden@buddenmorris.com ; frontline@wgbh.org
> Cc: info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; strategis@ic.gc.ca ; JackMCOPA@aol.com ;
> user.cru@pol.state.ma.us ; plypd@four.net ; corp.website@sunlife.com ;
> martine.turcotte@bell.ca ; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ;
> Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca ; Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca ; pm@pm.gc.ca ;
> jeff.mockler@gnb.ca ; diane.bourque@flsc.ca ; police@fredericton.ca
> Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 9:13 PM
> Subject: Good Day Charlie say het to Andy for me
>
>
>      Hey Andy do ya remember this email I sent before the last I came
> home? I bet Charlie Leblanc don't just as the other LeBlanc dude
> didn't want to talk fishing and you didn't want to talk about
> soliciting. Since I have left the last thing you want to talk about is
> Indians EH? What is you dudes do other than suck Martin's arse?
>
>        It seems the Frenchman who represents from Beauséjour, the area
> I was born in forgot the fact that both he and his wife are lawyers.
> Obviously I didn't. I also never forgot how Chréitian waltzed on down
> to Beauséjour years ago and his buddy Mulroney allowed him to have a
> seat without opposition except from a lady in CoR from Dorchester. You
> remember that place don't Charlie? I grew up just down the road from
> ya. What do you think will do the other LeBlanc Dude will do  when he
> receives the same material you did last year? I don't trust Frenchmen
> who are lawyers do you? Ask the other Frenchman you admire Bernard
> Richard who is a lawyer from Shediac/Cape Pele area why that is. What
> do ya think should I stress test the new kid on the block, Victor
> Boudreau. I know he ain't a lawyer but never the less he is still a
> god damned Frenchman. I think most Frenchmen are just like you Charles
> LeBlanc. Greedy Bullshiters. However I really love the French ladies.
> So does that make me all bad? Am I pissing anybody off yet? Good.
> Trust nobody is half as mad as I am right now but at least I am still
> having fun. I am just giggling up a storm at the thought of how many
> people are cursing my name :)
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: dwatch@web.net
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 11:32 PM
> Subject: Read real slow then forget what is politically correct.
>
> Deal with your own conscience. After that try to think of a good
> reason why I should not run for
> Parliament and at least speak my mind about the sad state of our affairs.
>
> You know who I am. If you don't, trust me, you are way behind the eight
> ball.
>
> Once I make my mark in the American Justice System and political
> process, I am coming home
> to stress test the ethics of many a lawyer/politician in my nativeland
> during the course of the next
> federal election. My question to all of you will be why did you wait
> for me to say something? Am I
> the only one paying any attention. Even Jesus got mad a time or two
> and tore up a temple when
> he saw all the money changing hands in a place that should not be
> concerned about such things.
> But forget about the money for a minute.
>
> What did he have to say about anyone that harmed a child?
> Rest assured I will remind you. Although Iain't religious, I must say
> that Jesus had more of sand
> than most men and he made some very good points about what is right
> and what is wrong. Can any
> of you even hold a candle to Byron? He has at least one friend that
> will back him up all the way
> down the line.
>
> I don't mind dying it is what I didn't do while I was living that will
> haunt me in in my grave. What is the
> golden rule these days? Is it truly a fact that he with the gold makes
> the rules. Do you think voters
> agree with that fact? What say you?
>
> Canadian Corruption
> Sexual Abuse & Political & Legal Conspiracy.
> RCMP Incompetence & Cover up.
> Priors Of Grand Bank NFLD Canada
>
> How do I get a corrupt legal system to investigate, charge and convict
> itself?
> After years of asking the Canadian Legal System to do its job, it's
> long past time to inform
> the public myself about this lack of action or justice.
>
> If T. Alex Hickman, Justice Minister, 1966 to 1979 also Health
> Minister 1968 to 1969 and
> Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland 1979 to 2000, 34 YEARS
> OF
> COMPLETE LEGAL SYSTEMS CONTROL,at 41 years of age, rapes and impregnates
> your younger sister Susan, at 12 years old, and in grade 8, what would you
> do?
> At 12 years old she was the youngest child ever,in Grand Bank,to have a
> baby.
>
> I am willing to take any tests and answer all questions regarding my
> entire life. All he has to
> do is take one blood test. It's time for him to stop manipulating our
> legal system and face the
> truth which I have been telling the legal System,and anyone else who
> would listen, all of my life.
> I didn't just awake one morning and decide to accuse the most powerful
> and most corrupt legal
> animal in this province. I have had, no childhood, no education, no
> family, no hometown, no
> self- esteem or self-respect and no past, present or future as a
> contributing person. By the time
> I was 14 years old I was responsible for 9 younger children, all of us
> abused and molested while
> our hometown either joined in, bothered us about our situation, or
> looked the other way and said
>  we were all trouble. and so on.......till the end.
>
> If anyone wishes to have the complete police statement contact me at
> alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net or
> telephone 709-834-9822. If I cannot reply I have been arrested. Please
> contact pm@pm.gc.ca or
> paul@paulmartin.ca and tell him the Priors of Grand Bank NF require
> Justice immediately.
>
> Thank You for helping.END OF WEB SITE
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre"
> dpm@pm.gc.ca
> To: davidamos@comcast.net
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:34 PM
> Subject: Regarding your e-mail
>
>  If you wish to receive a response to your comments addressed to the
> Deputy Prime Minister
> and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness, please
> include your return mailing
> address along with your original e-mail message.
>
> All official responses will be sent by regular mail.
>
> If you wish to send correspondence addressed to the Minister through
> the regular mail, please
> use the following mailing address:
>
> The Honourable A. Anne McLellan
> Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety
> and Emergency Preparedness
> 340 Laurier Avenue West
> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0P8
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Correspondance Deputy Prime Minister/Vice premier ministre
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 1:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
>
> I already received Anne's response. Can't you people read what you wrote to
> me?
>
> Why else would I be so pissed off? I am who I say I am and that is as
> follows:
>
> David R. Amos
> 153 Alvin Ave,
> Milton, MA. 02186
> Phone 617 240-6698
>
> Now just exactly who are you Mr. Correspondence Deputy Prime Minister
> and are you a lawyer?
>
>
>  Jan 3rd, 2004
>
>
>
> Mr. David R. Amos
>
>
>
>         153 Alvin Avenue
>
>
>
>              Milton, MA 02186
>
>
>
>                   U.S.A.
>
>
>
> Dear Mr. Amos
>
>
>
> Thank you for your letter of November 19th, 2003, addressed to my
> predecessor,
>
> the Honourble Wayne Easter, regarding your safety.
>
>
>
> I apologize for the delay in responding.
>
>
>
> If you have any concerns about your personal safety, I can only
> suggest that you
>
> contact the police of local jurisdiction. In addition, any evidence of
> criminal
>
> activity should be brought to their attention since the police are in the
> best
>
> position to evaluate the information and take action as deemed appropriate.
>
>
>
> I trust that this information is satisfactory.
>
>
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> A. Anne McLellan
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: alltrue@roadrunner.nf.net
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:03 PM
> Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: tedcardwell@mail.gov.nf.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:05 PM
> Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos mailto:davidamos@comcast.net
> Sent: March 16, 2004 2:07 PM
> To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> Subject: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 2:15 PM
> Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
>
> Thank you for the notice.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos mailto:davidamos@comcast.net
> Sent: March 22, 2004 3:28 PM
> To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
>
> No problem, Elsie. By the way my mom is a fan of yours. She told me
> you were quitting. Too bad if it is true.
>
> You are the first politician to respond to me. That fact alone wins my
> respect. Ask around Saint John about me
> in certain circles I am fairly well known. You may even know my
> sister, Nancy and her husband, Reid Chedore.
> Perhaps you crossed paths with my dad C. Max Amos he was a tax
> Supervisor for the Province years ago. And
> maybe even my mom's second husband, Lloyd Nickerson, from Fredericton.
> He was somewhat of a political person
> whereas my dad was not. (Lloyd was chief electoral officer for about
> twelve years and did run as a Conservative)
>
> If you wish to warm my mom's heart please give her a call and simply
> say that you appreciate her good words about
> you to her wild child Dalevid. She will get the joke. She is always
> confusing me with another brother. Her name is
> Anna and her number is 506 000 0000. Do with it what you will. Trust
> me I would love to see another out spoken
> Maritimer step up to the plate and speak of rights and wrongs. The
> sooner that I can go back to being just Papa the
> happier my little Clan will be. I would truly appreciate if someone
> would let my mom know that they are at least aware
> of my concerns whether they agree with me or not.
>
>                                                 Best Regards
>                                                                 Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> To: David Amos
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:42 PM
> Subject: RE: Regarding your e-mail
>
> Dear Dave,
>
> I try to respond to as many people as I can. We do get a lot of email
> around here....
>
> I decided to retire because I truly miss my family. It's hard being on
> the road back and forth by yourself.
>
> It gets very lonely.
>
>              God Bless,
>                               Elsie
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: Wayne, Elsie - M.P.
> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 5:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Regarding your e-mail
>
>
>        Elsie, I like you more and more. If anyone understands about
> being forced to be away from his family its me.
> Give my mom a call. Her laugh alone will make your day. To hell with
> the smiling bastards in Ottawa their grins
> ain't genuine. Maritimers can still find some fun in a long hard day
> :) Come to think of it, maybe thats why the
> Upper Canadians think we are crazy.
>
>         By the way I have managed to get a rather famous lawyer to
> speak on my wife's behalf down here while I run
> for Parliament uphome. But before I go I have been invited to go
> fishing with Martha Stewart's brother Frank in the
> Gulf of Mexico. My matters are about to bust wide open down here. That
> is why I have chosen this time to make
> an appearance uphome. Once I make the news down here I will step on
> the stump uphome.
>
>                                                            Best Regards
>
>       Dave
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: robmoore@atrueconservative.ca
> To: davidamos@comcast.net
> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2004 1:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: Regarding your e-mail
>
>
> David,
>
> Thanks for the e-mails.  I will read them all and hear what you have to
> say.
>
> All the best.
>
> Rob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: davidorchard@sasktel.net
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:15 PM
> Subject: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
>
>
> Just so ya know David I am forwarding these emails to other
> politicians as well.  But I didn't bother to call them because they
> are lawyers as well. Therefore I see no need to explain my actions to
> them. Plus the smart one's have a bad habit of trying to ignore me
> anyway. I t appears that standard operating procedure for them is to
> ignore. delay, deny and then try to settle. They are confused by
> someone that wants to argue law rather than go away with the gold.
> What should be interesting to both of us is whether or not they have a
> sudden fit of ethical behavior after they discover that an honest
> western farmer and wild but ethical maritime biker have been talking
> about them. Please notice that I am more than willing to help such a
> man as Byron Prior anyway I can. I just wish there were more men like
> him on this planet. Trust me the US Attorney backtracking in the
> Martha Stewart matter and prosecuting a Secret Service Agent is too
> funny to relate in this email.
>                             Dave
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: rosent@math.toronto.edu
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 1:30 PM
> Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: jim.prentice@shaw.ca
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 3:41 PM
> Subject: Fw: Here is some proof that Harper knows I coming home
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: leblad@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:03 PM
> Subject: You, the Harvard Crowd and I
>
>
> We are going to have lots to argue about very soon. But like any true
> Maritimer we should first discuss why the Fishing ain't worth a good
> God damn.
>
>
>
> March 18, 2004
> Ottawa, Ontario
> Prime Minister Paul Martin announced today the renewed mandate of the
> Task Force on Seasonal Work. The Task Force will evaluate the
> challenges born by seasonal industries while looking into the needs of
> workers and communities that depend on them and provide advice on
> areas for possible action in the future.
>
> “This government places great importance on hearing from those lives
> that are directly impacted by our policies, including our seasonal
> workers. Our Caucus has been extremely active in making the sector’s
> opinions known, and will continue to play an important role in further
> examining those views,” said Prime Minister Paul Martin.
>
> “We are facing particularly challenging times in one of our economy’s
> strongest sectors and I look forward to working in collaboration with
> Parliamentarians and all Canadians to find solutions.”
>
> The Task Force will examine;
>
> the specific needs of seasonal industries and workers in the area of
> skills development, life-long learning, and literacy;
>
>
> ways to promote greater economic diversity and stronger local
> economies, particularly in rural and remote communities across Canada;
>
>
> the support required to help seasonal work dependent communities to
> adapt to seize opportunities provided by the new knowledge-based
> global economy;
>
>
> ways of lowering barriers to regional and interprovincial labour mobility;
>
>
> how to align income support programs such as Employment Insurance and
> Provincial Social Assistance Programs to improve income support, while
> also promoting full, year-round participation in the labour force;
>
> ways of addressing the challenges and opportunities offered by
> temporary foreign workers;
>
> the potential role for government in encouraging new approaches to
> community development, i.e. the `social economy` ;
>
> an assessment of the opportunities and challenges specific to seasonal
> economies in promoting the safeguard of our natural environment;
>
> The Task Force will deliver its report to the Prime Minister by November
> 2004.
>
> Members of the Prime Minister`s Task Force on Seasonal Work include;
>
> Chair: Brent St. Denis, MP (Algoma-Manitoulin)
> Vice-Chair: The Honourable Pierrette Ringuette, Senator (New Brunswick)
> Members: The Honourable Libby Hubley, Senator (Prince Edward Island)
> The Honourable Lorna Milne, Senator (Ontario)
> Dominic Leblanc, MP (Beauséjour-Petitcodiac)
> Jeannot Castonguay, MP (Madawaska-Restigouche)
> Rick Laliberte, MP (Churchill River)
> Georges Farrah, MP (Bonaventure-Gaspé-Îles-de-la-Madeleine-Pabok)
> Nancy Karetak-Lindell, MP (Nunavut)
>
>       Dominic LeBlanc was elected to the House of Commons in November
> 2000. Since then he has served on the Special Committee on Non-Medical
> Use of Drugs, and the Standing Committees on Fisheries and Oceans,
> Transport and Government Operations, National Defence and Veterans
> Affairs, and Public Accounts. He has also served as Parliamentary
> Secretary to the Minister of National Defence and was Chair of the
> Atlantic Caucus
>
> .
>
>       Mr. LeBlanc received a B.A. in political science from the
> University of Toronto (Trinity College), his Bachelor of Laws from the
> University of New Brunswick, and then attended Harvard Law School,
> where he obtained his Masters of Law. Academic successes include the
> Dean's List at the University of New Brunswick's Faculty of Law, a
> scholarship from the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian Bar
> Association, and the Graduating Average Prize from Trinity College at
> the University of Toronto.
>
> Prior to his election to the House of Commons, Mr. LeBlanc was a
> barrister and solicitor with Clark Drummie in Shediac and Moncton.
> From 1993-1996, Mr. LeBlanc was a Special Advisor to the Prime
> Minister of Canada.
>
>
>
>      Mr. LeBlanc is married to Jolène Richard, a Moncton lawyer. They
> have one son, Selby.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: David Amos
> To: scotta@parl.gc.ca
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 5:55 PM
>
>
> Hey,
>    Methinks you and I should have a long talk very soon about
> Maritimers and Solicitor Generals. Call Anne McLellan or Wayne Easter
> and mention my name if you haven't heard of it by now. Trust that no
> lawyer uphome will welcome my letters. They hate it when they are
> compelled to uphold the law and the Public Trust particularly at
> election time.
>            David R. Amos
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 2 image/tiff name=New Solicitor General.tif
>
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 3 image/tiff name=Insp+General+DHS.tiff
>
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 4 image/tiff name=Francis+Galvin+too+late.tiff
>
>
>> ATTACHMENT part 5 image/tiff name=AG+Elliott+Spitzer.tiff
>
> Charles LeBlanc
> 114 Brunswick Street
> Fredericton
> New Brunswick
>
>
> Charles LeBlanc
> 114 Brunswick Street
> Fredericton
> New Brunswick
>
> I have too many people on my list so I added
> another account! Some of you will received my updates
> from oldmaison1@yahoo.ca and others will be
> oldmaison@yahoo.com...It just takes me too long to
> send my update with only one account!
>
> Ok..yesterday, I phoned the editor of the Local
> paper and asked him where do I send the bill for my
> stomach Transplant? The Irvings?????
> This is what got me very upset-
>
> Daily Gleaner | Brent Taylor
> As published on page A8 on January 11, 2005
>
> Robichaud made an impact
> Brent Taylor
> REALITY CHECK
>
> This morning in Moncton Louis Robichaud was given his
> final farewell.
>
> He had not been well in recent weeks, but maybe not
> everybody knew that. Journalists knew, and had been
> preparing for some time. So, when the sad news finally
> came last Thursday, New Brunswick's media was ready to
> retell the story of the "father of modern New
> Brunswick."
>
> All of the papers had extensive coverage, as did the
> electronic media.
>
> In helping to prepare a little of that preliminary
> work myself, I spent quite a bit of time researching
> the career of Louis Robichaud. The more I found, the
> more fascinated I became. Being a resident of Quebec
> for the entire 10-year reign of Robichaud, I never saw
> in person the changes he brought to the province. AND
> IT GOES ON BLAH BLAH BLAH….
>
> For you people who’s not familiar with Brent
> Taylor?
>
> He’s a former MLA from the C.O.R. Party! I used
> to debate Acadian issues with these bigots for years
> in the letters to the editor!
>
> The C.O.R. Party was to the Acadian population
> like the KKK is to the Blacks! Brent Taylor ran for
> the Leadership of the C.O.R. Party in the early 90s
> while in Campbellton he made a very very very
> Anti-French speech!
>
> We all know that a leopard never changes it spots
> and it makes me sick to my stomach seeing this
> headline in the Daily Gleaner and of course I never
> read this BS anyway but there’s something that I
> found very interesting yesterday.
>
> Someone told me that Brent Taylor will run under
> the P.C. Banner during the next Provincial Election!
> Well? I’ll tell you one thing right now!!! If Bernard Lord
> allows that Bigot to run??? Well? I’m going to be front
> and center with this issue!
>
> The P.C Party shouldn’t associate themselves with
> a man like Brent Taylor. Mind you, I met and have some
> good friends from the C.O.R. Party!
>
> As a matter of fact, I had a good chat with Max
> White during the P.C. Annual meeting in Fredericton a
> few months ago!
>
> But I’ll never forget Brent Taylor speech and I’m
> very surprised that he has his own column in the
> Irving Papers???  Why is that now???
>
> The Telegraph Journal stop printing my letters
> but they allowed a bigot to spread his views? Why is
> that now? Who knows?
>
> I crashed their first annual convention in 1991
> when Danny Cameron held a news conference telling the
> Government of the day < Frank McKenna > to removed the
> Acadian flag from on top of the Legislature.
>
> My actions went across Canada. There were 1,000
> members at that convention and I am not afraid to
> speak out against hatred!!!
>
> I was very surprised to see J.K. Irving at Louis
> Robichaud Funeral yesterday!
>
> Of course, I always like J.K. anyway but it’s his
> son J.D that I don’t care for!
>
> Hey? Any Billionaire who supports Racism? There’s
> definitely something wrong with this Picture.
>
> I told J.D. himself that he had a very racist
> Supervisor working at Gulf Operators
>
>
> The Rise and Fall of the New Brunswick CoR Party, 1988-1995
> Geoffrey Martin
>
>
> At the time this article was written Geoffrey Martin was teaching at
> Mount Allison University in Sackville, New Brunswick
>
> This article traces the rise and fall of one of Canada's
> recently-formed populist, "New right" parties, the Confederation of
> Regions Party of New Brunswick. It shows how and why the party was
> formed and why it collapsed in the last provincial election. COR-NB
> was a programmatic party based on political protest, which advocated a
> libertarian ideology. The article argues that partisan realignment is
> possible in "traditional" areas like New Brunswick, but that the anger
> that led to the formation of the party eventually turned inward and
> destroyed the party's coherence.
>
> On September 11, 1995, the saga of the Confederation of Regions Party
> of New Brunswick (COR-NB) ended, when the party received 7% of the
> votes and no seats in the provincial election. This represented a
> major collapse of a party, which in the 1991 provincial election
> polled 87,256 votes (21% of the total), took 8 seats, and the position
> of Official Opposition in the Legislative Assembly. As it turned out,
> COR-NB's success in 1991 took place in a "populist moment" in New
> Brunswick politics, in which a number of factors came together to
> enable a new party, which rejected "Official Bilingualism" and many of
> the basic principles of the political system, to achieve significant
> success in a province with almost no tradition of third-party
> activity. COR's collapse in the recent election shows that this
> populist moment has passed, along with the other factors that made for
> COR-NB's success. For the forseeable future New Brunswick politics has
> returned to its historic pattern of two-party competition among
> small-c conservative elites.
>
> The COR Party of New Brunswick
>
> COR-NB was formed in 1989, less than two years after the "McKenna
> sweep" of 1987, in which the Liberal Party under Frank McKenna won
> every single seat in the legislature. In the 1991 election, COR-NB won
> its seats in the South and Central parts of the province, and its
> support was also disproportionately in rural, sparsely populated
> areas. COR took advantage of the voters' underlying concern about
> bilingualism. It did this chiefly in the former heartland of the
> Progressive Conservative (PC) Party.
>
> There are five central points that describe the party's platform and
> principles.
>
> The party was, first of all, a programmatic party, not a brokerage
> party. It had a fixed programme which its activists were unwilling to
> compromise.
>
> Second, it was a protest party with roots in a single issue, that of
> "Official Bilingualism." The party was essentially an "ethnic party"
> representing a segment of English New Brunswick which was extremely
> dissatisfied, to the point of anger, over the direction of public
> policy in the province and the country.1
>
> Third, like Social Credit in Alberta, COR-NB was a populist party and
> it placed high priority on changing the system in addition to changing
> specific public policies. This populism was represented most
> significantly in the inversion of the political hierarcy: For COR
> activists, elected members were responsible to the Electorate first,
> then the Party, and only finally the Leader.
>
> Fourth, ideologically the party is "classical liberal" in the
> nineteenth century sense, which today is best referred to as
> libertarian.
>
> Fifth and finally, like Social Credit in the past, in class terms the
> COR Party is petty bourgeois and lower-middle class in its
> orientation.
>
> This final point is important and too often neglected, and is also
> relevant to other Canadian political experiments, especially the
> Reform Party of Canada. In its heyday the COR Party was dominated by
> middle-income and small-business people, professionals, and the
> self-employed. The middle class is the backbone of advanced industrial
> societies and pays more than its share of taxes and is most likely to
> feel put upon and unable to "get ahead." The party went beyond
> appealing only to "middle-income groups." It was also a reflection of
> those individuals who have an intermediate amount of control over
> their work, including professionals, small business people, and
> independent commodity producers, like farmers, woodlot owners, fishers
> and the self-employed in general. These characteristics are important
> because this class sometimes allies with the working class, sometimes
> with the middle class, and sometimes is alienated from both.
>
> Political parties based purely on the middle class and petty
> bourgeoisie are notoriously hard to hold together. As C. B. MacPherson
> notes, "the petite-bourgeoisie cannot be cohesive" in politics because
> the individualism of members of this class divides it and splinters it
> apart.2
>
> In electoral terms the COR Party was not a party of big business or
> the affluent, even if its programme, especially the provisions that
> weaken government, would seem to provide disproportionate benefits to
> large corporate interests. Yet high income groups and wealth holders
> appear to have stuck with the Liberals and PCs. This is symbolized by
> the close association of the powerful McCain family with the Liberal
> Party, and the fact that one of the McCain spouses, Margaret Norrie
> McCain, was appointed to a five-year term as the province's
> Lieutenant-Governor in 1994. The Irving interests, both individual and
> corporate, are harder to identify with certainty. The descendants of
> the founder of the Irving empire take little public role in partisan
> politics, seeming to prefer to influence the provincial government of
> the day regardless of its political stripe. Judging from the 1993
> federal election and the 1995 provincial election, the Irving
> preference runs towards the "old line" parties and not populist
> alternatives further to the right or the left. In the 1993 federal
> campaign, the Irving interests made financial contributions to both
> the PC and Liberal campaign funds, and not to Reform, the National
> Party or the NDP.3
>
> The Formation of the COR Party
>
> The McKenna Liberals completely dominated New Brunswick politics from
> 1987 to 1989, and New Brunswick was effectively a one-party province
> during that time. Yet the COR Party rose much faster, less than two
> years after the 1987 election, than is usually the case with third
> parties. First of all, this rapid rise is explained by the seriousness
> and longevity of New Brunswick's high unemployment and economic
> hardship over the last 25 years. The Progressive Conservative Party
> was wiped out in 1987 as a repudiation of Richard Hatfield, whose
> longevity in power and personal legal troubles turned the electorate
> against him. Further, the Progressive Conservative Party was slow to
> rebuild, and the leader it finally elected, Barbara Baird Filliter,
> was generally regarded as ineffective. The rapidity of the rise of
> COR-NB was also a response to the McKenna government's desire to
> increase bilingualism in the civil service, an effort which the
> government has since admitted it has not succeeded in achieving.
> Finally, for many activists and voters, federal and provincial
> politics are not separate, and one reason for the rise of the COR-NB
> was the activists' distaste for the Mulroney government, another
> handicap for the provincial PC Party.
>
> A neglected aspect of the rise of COR-NB was its genesis as a social
> movement called the New Brunswick Association of English-Speaking
> Canadians, usually shortened to the English Speaking Association
> (ESA). The ESA was formed in the early 1980s to oppose the extension
> of bilingualism in the provincial government, something that it was
> effective in preventing. The ESA was like a party-in-waiting with a
> membership and an agenda, so that activists were easy to mobilize once
> the decision to form a new party was taken in the late 1980s. By that
> time individuals involved in the organization began to question their
> effectiveness as a lobby group. "We brought our concerns to government
> but it just became frustrating because month after month we were
> bringing the same concerns, getting the same answers, and really not
> getting anywhere," said Arch Pafford, COR-NB's first president, first
> leader, and an ESA activist.4
>
> The ESA was a single-issue social movement and the COR Party inherited
> ESA activists and this issue. Perhaps because of its ties to the
> (now-defunct) federal COR Party, COR-NB quickly developed similar New
> Right policies, including opposition to the Meech Lake Accord and
> support for parliamentary reform, tax reform, privatization, and
> deregulation. While party activists claim the COR Party is not a
> one-issue party, the party, like the ESA before it, would never had
> been formed without Anglophone discontent over the perceived lack of
> jobs for Anglophones, and Official Bilingualism, two phenomena that
> COR-NB activists always linked together. As Sue Calhoun has written,
> "If someone is pushed about why they joined COR, the answer is,
> inevitably, because of language."5 Just as the ESA was a protest
> vehicle, the COR Party was a protest party because of its desire to
> overturn the status quo and because of its dependence on a single
> issue, that of language policy.
>
> The COR Party in Decline
>
> By the fall of 1993, two years after the party's breakthrough in the
> 1991 election, the COR Party was clearly in decline, manifested in the
> party's slide in public opinion polls as well as internal bickering.
> By 1994 the party consistently polled between 3-7% of decided voters
> in various polls (down from 21% in the 1991 election) and its
> membership had plunged from around 20,000 in 1991 to approximately
> 2500 by the end of 1994. To some extent the conditions for the decline
> of the party mirror the conditions under which it arose.
>
> In this section some of the reasons for the party's decline will be
> outlined, but we will concentrate on one of the root reasons for the
> party's problems, that of the incompatibility between the party's: a)
> populism; b) free market ideology, and; c) its role as a political
> party and Official Opposition in the existing system. In contrast to
> many members of the party, the argument presented here is that COR's
> problem was not just a matter of finding a new or better leader.
>
> The party ultimately collapsed because of the membership's approach to
> politics and because a section of the party was unwilling to conform
> to the existing party system.
>
> There are straight-forward reasons for the party's decline that should
> be delineated briefly. First, the departure of Brian Mulroney from
> national politics, and the collapse of the federal PCs in the 1993
> federal election, made it possible for small-c conservatives to return
> to the provincial PC Party. Second, the COR Party suffered a double
> blow from the Charlottetown Constitutional Accord referendum in 1992.
> Since the accord was defeated nationally, constitutional and language
> issues disappeared for a time from the political agenda, which hurt
> the COR Party's ability to grab public attention. Even the province's
> constitutionalization of Bill 88, which declared the equality of the
> Francophone and Anglophone communities in the province, and the 1994
> Québec election, did not excite widespread public attention. The
> second blow was that COR-NB led the anti-accord side in New Brunswick
> in 1992 and yet the pro-accord side won convincingly in the province,
> all of which undermined COR-NB's claim that it represented some kind
> of "silent majority."
>
> Third, the provincial PC Party gained new credibility in the last two
> years because of the effectiveness of its leader, Dennis Cochrane, who
> was elected to that position and to the Legislative Assembly in 1991.
> Even the sudden resignation of Mr. Cochrane in the spring of 1995, and
> his replacement by former Mulroney cabinet minister Bernard Valcourt,
> did not revive COR's fortune's. Fourth, Frank McKenna's Liberal
> government was rightward leaning during its second mandate (1991-95),
> given its attitudes toward individual and provincial self-reliance,
> cuts to social and health services, and its emphasis on job creation
> in the private sector. This also hurt the COR Party because like a
> competent brokerage politician, McKenna's rightward move undercut
> COR-NB support, and this left most opponents of the government in the
> centre (supporting the PCs) or to the left (supporting the NDP, led by
> Elizabeth Weir).
>
> All of these are important reasons for the decline of the party, but
> we should concentrate on another reason, the incompatibility of the
> party's self-identity and its role in the system. The party tried to
> combine populism and free market economics, two ideologies that are
> often in conflict because the interest of the "common man" is often in
> conflict with the interests of even small business, let alone the
> larger firms that dominate the New Brunswick political economy. Like
> the supporters of the United Farmers and Social Credit in Alberta,
> COR-NB members believed in the value of the individual and of free
> enterprise, even though the concentration of capital and high levels
> of unemployment are the result of the particular form of
> resource-based capitalism that exists in New Brunswick. The COR Party
> started as a "revolt against the system," though by 1993 the party
> increasingly internalized the system and so the revolt turned inward,
> with all of the venom once reserved only for the New Brunswick Society
> of Acadians and the established parties.
>
> As the economy and job situation in New Brunswick improved somewhat
> after the recession of the early 1990s, COR-NB lost momentum. (Instead
> of scapegoating Acadians as they did in the late 1980s, in 1995 New
> Brunswick Anglophones were more likely to feel aggrieved at the
> Liberal federal government for tightening the Unemployment Insurance
> rules in the 1994 budget, or for its gun control initiative of 1995.)
>
> There is a serious structural problem underlying these internal
> conflicts, in the form of an ideological conflict between Board
> control and caucus control of the party. As has been stated above, the
> party policy is that an elected member is responsible to the
> electorate first, the party second, and the leader last. Yet under its
> constitution the COR Party—and not the elected caucus—selected the
> leader and the Board of Directors could call a leadership convention,
> which inevitably gave the party control over the elected members.
>
> Greg Hargrove (MLA-York North) said in 1993 that the Board overstepped
> its authority in trying to dump then-leader Danny Cameron because the
> Board is answerable to the membership while the caucus is responsible
> to the electorate. By this line of reasoning, the membership can elect
> a leader but cannot remove a leader, which ultimately sounds like the
> "old-line parties" that the COR Party criticized. This suggests an
> inherent contradiction in the party's inversion of the
> "Leader-Party-Electorate" hierarchy, because elected members cannot be
> responsible to the electorate first given the party's power to remove
> the party leader by calling a leadership convention.
>
> Conclusion
>
> COR-NB was a right-of-centre protest party that picked up on the
> tendency of many New Brunswick Anglophones to blame their economic
> woes on Official Bilingualism, big government, and "special interest
> groups." The COR Party went into the vacuum left by the collapse of
> the provincial PCs, aided by the general weakness of political
> opposition in McKenna's first term and the unpopularity of the
> Mulroney government in the Atlantic region. The political culture of
> New Brunswick was, for a brief period, not as traditional as many
> observers claim, because a significant segment of the electorate
> proved that they were willing to try a political alternative to the
> two dominant parties. By making the COR Party the Official Opposition,
> the voters showed that they were prepared to forgo, both as
> individuals and as constituencies, the benefits of having a member on
> the government side of the house.
>
> The COR Party ultimately declined because of the contradiction between
> its anti-party populism and the realities of operating a political
> party in the existing party system. This essay also shows the risks of
> building a new party based on participatory and populist principles
> when it must function in a "democratic" political system that remains
> hierarchical and discourages active, meaningful, mass participation in
> the process of governing between elections. With the election of 1995,
> the voters have again accepted the elitist political system, in which
> a government is judged based on its results—the "bottom line"—and not
> on its style.
>
> The COR Party was formed by a delicate coalition of populists,
> anti-francophone activists, and traditional conservatives. This
> coalition has shattered, and it is unlikely that it will come back
> together in the near future. It may take a generation to rebuild it.
> There is some possibility that populism will make itself felt in the
> coming years, if people increasingly feel alienated from New
> Brunswick's McKenna government and from the Chrétien government in
> Ottawa. The key question is whether any political party can take
> advantage of this populist discontent without itself being consumed by
> its fires.
>
> Notes
>
> 1. More attention is paid to the issue of bilingualism as well as the
> ethnic basis of the party in another article by the same author,
> entitled "The New Brunswick COR Party as an `Ethnic Party'", Canadian
> Review of Studies in Nationalism, forthcoming, 1996, Vol. 23.
>
> 2. See C.B. MacPherson, Democracy in Alberta: Social Credit and the
> Party System, Second Edition, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press,
> 1962), pp. 224-226.
>
> 3. New Brunwick Telegraph Journal, October 4, 1994, p. 1.
>
> 4. Interview with Arch Pafford, Nordin, NB, August 20, 1993.
>
> 5. Sue Calhoun, "Getting to the Core of COR," New Maritimes, 1992,
> vol. 11, No. (2) November/December, p. 15.
>
>
>
> From: "MacPherson, Don"<macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>
> Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 07:29:42 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: Ms Blatchford please allow me to introduce
> you to Google's lawyer David Drummond and Mr Baconfat's buddies in the
> Daily Gleaner Gisele McKnight and Dastardly Don MacPherson
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> I'll be out of the office on vacation from Aug. 30 to Sept. 8,
> returning Sept. 9.
>