https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
#nbpoli#cdnpoli
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-snc-lavalin-fraud-corruption-1.5009578
Irv Millar
Shawn Wylie
Dan Flanagan
Daryl McBride
Pam Sutton
Methinks there are no coincidences N'esy Pas?
Jamie Gillis "
Daryl McBride
Adam Smith
Richard Dekkar
bill chagwich
Jamie Gillis
bobby ornstein
John Wakefield
Robert Fournier
Steve Sax
Tim O'Day
Nico De Jong
John Smith
Pam Sutton
Steve Sax
John Paul Maxwell
Pam Sutton
Nico De Jong
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/trudeau-snc-lavalin-fraud-corruption-1.5009578
Trudeau under fire over claim he pressured justice minister to intervene in SNC-Lavalin fraud case
Comments
Irv Millar
The straws are being grasped. A mountain and the mole hill. The only way the Conservatives know how to govern. In blame, but no self-blame. There's mirrors for that eh?
Frank G. Castiglione
@Irv Millar the boy wonders swan song.
steve curtis
@Irv Millar
Just wake up?
Just wake up?
Max Ruger
@Irv Millar Are you insane ? This has nothing to do with the Conservatives. They didn't break the story, the Globe and Mail did. How can you defend this ?
William Martin
@Irv Millar Yes trying to alter an ongoing investigation is making a mountain out of a mole hill. SMH.
Irv Millar
@steve curtis Nope. I have memories of a former PM that sold out a national legacy, CN, then moved onto the nation, NAFTA. You remember what party this was/is do you not?
steve curtis
@Irv Millar
J T and his daddy, from what I remember. You a banker? "cause you sure love the sell out.
J T and his daddy, from what I remember. You a banker? "cause you sure love the sell out.
Irv Millar
@Max Ruger The Conservatives and SNC Lavalin have a storied past. Read the Globe and Mail articles on this latest Conservative stab/grab for election traction. Then do a little research into the likes of Dr. Porter and the whole cabal that fleeced the nation. Then you'll have a better perspective.
Felix Culpa
@Irv Millar
Sure. Chrétien sold CN in 1995. I think he was a Liberal. Mulroney signed NAFTA, a good deal for Canada, but somewhat diminished thanks to Trump and the current PM.
Sure. Chrétien sold CN in 1995. I think he was a Liberal. Mulroney signed NAFTA, a good deal for Canada, but somewhat diminished thanks to Trump and the current PM.
Irv Millar
@steve curtis Did you read the Globe and Mail articles?
Irv Millar
@Felix Culpa Wrong. Read a little more then get back to us.
Daryl McBride
@Irv Millar 166 votes in 19 minutes, is that a record?
Bert Law
@Daryl McBride
actually it only took 15 seconds.
i was watching
actually it only took 15 seconds.
i was watching
Daryl McBride
@Bert Law same thing happened with the Khadr story.
Jamie Gillis
@Irv Millar
Nice hack of the system.
Nice hack of the system.
Bert Law
@Daryl McBride
I suggest report it to the ombudsman here.
I suggest report it to the ombudsman here.
Donald Patrick
@Jamie Gillis Sickening isn't it? So bloody blatant.
Bert Law
@Jamie Gillis
yup. first comment. 170 up votes.
second only 12 .... obviously hacked
yup. first comment. 170 up votes.
second only 12 .... obviously hacked
Rick Meyer
@Jamie Gillis
Everyone needs to flag the fake top calm mints
Everyone needs to flag the fake top calm mints
david kirby
@Bert Law
That will do no good at all. I tried it once
That will do no good at all. I tried it once
William Martin
@Irv Millar Here is another post where the votes were rigged.
Daryl McBride
@William Martin I took a video of the manipulation, who to send it to?
Ron Brady
@Daryl McBride YouTube it.
Phil Mein
@Irv Millar No need to grasp at straws, like his stay on the private island he "didn't see any ethical breach" with until it was explained what the definition is. Justin already has a LONG list of transgressions he needs to explain to Canadians, no doubt you'll all be here frothing at the mouth trying to defend his shortcomings, , which is great , because HERE at the CBC you're all preaching to the Liberal choir , meaning you're all just having ZERO influence on anybody outside of your shallow pool of cheerleaders. October is gonna e great !
Al Kennedy
@Irv Millar
You are wrong. Chretien sold CNR in 1995. Then Chretien sold the Port of Churchill , which includes the grain elevator and the Churchill Fuel Terminal, to OmniTRAX in 1997. OmniTRAX owns the Hudson Bay Railroad and the rail line that runs from The Pas to Churchill. And Chretien got elected in his promise to "tear up that NAFTA" and get rid of the GST.
You are wrong. Chretien sold CNR in 1995. Then Chretien sold the Port of Churchill , which includes the grain elevator and the Churchill Fuel Terminal, to OmniTRAX in 1997. OmniTRAX owns the Hudson Bay Railroad and the rail line that runs from The Pas to Churchill. And Chretien got elected in his promise to "tear up that NAFTA" and get rid of the GST.
Al Kennedy
@Irv Millar
And I forgot to mention that the company that Chretien sold the port to is an American company.
And I forgot to mention that the company that Chretien sold the port to is an American company.
David Amos
@Irv Millar Methinks if you knew what I know you would sing a different tune Lets just say anyone can surf the net using certain names and mine as well N'esy Pas?
Jenna Collins
@Irv Millar
How in the world did this comment make it to the most liked? I've been ban-ned from this site for commenting off topic and yet here you are.
How in the world did this comment make it to the most liked? I've been ban-ned from this site for commenting off topic and yet here you are.
Shawn Wylie
The accused has a right to question the accuser who is conveniently an anonymous source, until actual evidence is put forward this is a non starter.
Steve Sax
@Shawn Wylie
Ya. All those anonymous sources that have attacked Trump. But that’s okay as long it suits your narrative
Ya. All those anonymous sources that have attacked Trump. But that’s okay as long it suits your narrative
William Martin
@Shawn Wylie Would you be so generous with a different government?
Shawn Wylie
@Steve Sax Ah one of the sheep can talk.
Shawn Wylie
@William Martin I would be the same with any government, I don't hold any party affiliation as any smart voter would do, you go by the facts that are presented and so far non have been presented.
Ron Brady
@Shawn Wylie Would you rather talk about MP Grewal?
Shawn Wylie
@Ron Brady ?
Robert Tyre
@Shawn Wylie seems though we never get to the "evidence". Things get buried, sealed, people get leaned on, orders come down, and voila, house (mansion) arrest and a tax deductible fine equal to pocket change.
Shawn Wylie
@Steve Sax If your a fan of Trump you are a sheep, he's been a con man all his life and has ripped of people to get his small fortune, his famous line is sue me, same line he used for running a fake charity and his family using it as their piggy bank, have a nice life.
Al Kennedy
@Shawn Wylie
What about asking the person at the center of this? Oh yes they did, and she would neither confirm or deny it.
hmmm?
What about asking the person at the center of this? Oh yes they did, and she would neither confirm or deny it.
hmmm?
Shawn Wylie
@Robert Tyre Be patient, get the facts before making decisions, if there is anything to it it will come out. We're leading up to the elections and unfortunately the Reform/PC's of late have been well known for starting false rumours and news.
Shawn Wylie
@Al Kennedy So what's your point, or are you just going to automatically make a judgement based on nothing?
Shawn Wylie
@Ron Brady Good deflection.
Al Kennedy
@Shawn Wylie
Well if the allegations were false, why wouldn't she say that?
Well if the allegations were false, why wouldn't she say that?
Ron Brady
@Shawn Wylie lol ... what ???
Jenna Collins
@Shawn Wylie
Someone here on this site has given you a lot of likes for this comment. The like/dislike manipulation is back.
Someone here on this site has given you a lot of likes for this comment. The like/dislike manipulation is back.
David Amos
@Shawn Wylie Methinks a few fancy people have been much embarrassed by anonymous sources over the years However I am not anonymous and did in fact sue the Crown N'esy Pas?
Dan Flanagan
"However, Trudeau's denial did little to satisfy the opposition Conservatives and New Democrats. The allegations, made by unnamed sources to the Globe and Mail, dominated Thursday's question period."
What a shock!
Scheer desperately trying to get people to remember his name and, well, the NDP are the NDP
What a shock!
Scheer desperately trying to get people to remember his name and, well, the NDP are the NDP
Chuck Darwin
@Dan Flanagan
Drowning man, grasping for a rope
Drowning man, grasping for a rope
Dan Flanagan
@Chuck Darwin Proof?
Chuck Darwin
@Dan Flanagan
To quote a liberal
The proof is the proof
To quote a liberal
The proof is the proof
Edward Mann
@Dan Flanagan
Waiting for the proof... It will come
Waiting for the proof... It will come
Jim Gurtle
@Dan Flanagan elections are usually more about voting against someone. From that perspective, I’d say Justin should get his luggage ready
Rick Meyer
@Dan Flanagan
I see the upvotes have been hacked
I see the upvotes have been hacked
William Martin
@Dan Flanagan Why on earth do you have 150 upvotes?
Byron Whitford
@William Martin
Vote manipulation. 150 upvotes and 150 downvotes all at once on certain comments to manipulate the forum.
Vote manipulation. 150 upvotes and 150 downvotes all at once on certain comments to manipulate the forum.
David Amos
@Byron Whitford Welcome to the Circus
Jenna Collins
@Byron Whitford
Someone is manipulating comments.
Someone is manipulating comments.
Daryl McBride
I will believe the Globe and Mail instead of the first Pm ever to break ethics law, 4 of them to boot.
Troy Mann
@Daryl McBride
Wow, you of all people dont believe the PM even though no shred of evidence is supplied. Wild stuff, let us know when you actually believed our PM?
You supported Harper contempt of parliament so dont give us the ethics baloney.
Wow, you of all people dont believe the PM even though no shred of evidence is supplied. Wild stuff, let us know when you actually believed our PM?
You supported Harper contempt of parliament so dont give us the ethics baloney.
Hermann Mattfield
@Troy Mann ...awwww!!! Troy you got our PM's back...lol
Jamie Gillis
@Troy Mann
Troy, for the allegations to be false, "well-connected Liberals, "Liberal insiders," and "SNC Lavalin sources" had to conspire together to create a hoax. Think about this one.
Troy, for the allegations to be false, "well-connected Liberals, "Liberal insiders," and "SNC Lavalin sources" had to conspire together to create a hoax. Think about this one.
Neil Turv
@Troy Mann
The point is that no matter who is in power you will find evidence of nepotism, corruption, etc. etc.
Harper was found in Contempt, a few of his senators misused public funds, robocalls.
Trudeau was found guilty of ethics violations, and outside of the SNC the Liberals have several other questionable financial deals that have been or are under scrutiny.
Chretien had the sponsorship scandal, HRDC scandal, allegations of covering up the Canadian peacekeepers abuse in Somalia
Mulroney has serious evidence against him regarding bribes and payoffs....
etc. etc.
You give someone power they will abuse it, it's not a Con thing, not a Liberal thing, and if the NDP run the country I'll guarantee something will happen under their watch too.
The point is that no matter who is in power you will find evidence of nepotism, corruption, etc. etc.
Harper was found in Contempt, a few of his senators misused public funds, robocalls.
Trudeau was found guilty of ethics violations, and outside of the SNC the Liberals have several other questionable financial deals that have been or are under scrutiny.
Chretien had the sponsorship scandal, HRDC scandal, allegations of covering up the Canadian peacekeepers abuse in Somalia
Mulroney has serious evidence against him regarding bribes and payoffs....
etc. etc.
You give someone power they will abuse it, it's not a Con thing, not a Liberal thing, and if the NDP run the country I'll guarantee something will happen under their watch too.
Jamie Gillis
@Daryl McBride
I haven't always agreed with her, but given the circumstances, I have to applaud Jody Wilson-Raybould. She stood up to the bullies in the Prime Minister's Officer and stood her ground. And even in the face of multiple sources supporting the allegations, she won't throw her party under the bus. Liberals: that should be your leader right there.
I haven't always agreed with her, but given the circumstances, I have to applaud Jody Wilson-Raybould. She stood up to the bullies in the Prime Minister's Officer and stood her ground. And even in the face of multiple sources supporting the allegations, she won't throw her party under the bus. Liberals: that should be your leader right there.
William Martin
@Daryl McBride I'm with you on that one.
James Holden
@Daryl McBride
No laws have been broken by this Government.
Unlike the last one.
No laws have been broken by this Government.
Unlike the last one.
James Holden
@Daryl McBride
We have a new Justice Minister from Montreal.
Still the case has not been set aside.
That fact negates the allegations that she was demoted for not setting the prosecution aside.
The story does not hold water.
We have a new Justice Minister from Montreal.
Still the case has not been set aside.
That fact negates the allegations that she was demoted for not setting the prosecution aside.
The story does not hold water.
Daryl McBride
@James Holden Not according to the facts,
https://www.cbc.ca/news/thenational/trudeau-breaks-federal-ethics-laws-first-prime-minister-to-do-so-at-issue-1.4459763
https://www.cbc.ca/news/thenational/trudeau-breaks-federal-ethics-laws-first-prime-minister-to-do-so-at-issue-1.4459763
Ron Brady
@Troy Mann "But, but Harper" won't cut it today, I'm afraid.
Jamie Gillis
@James Holden "We have a new Justice Minister from Montreal. Still the case has not been set aside."
The cabinet shuffle isn't even a month old! That's not indicative of anything. And why would Liberal and SNC Lavalin insiders all be saying this is it weren't true?
The cabinet shuffle isn't even a month old! That's not indicative of anything. And why would Liberal and SNC Lavalin insiders all be saying this is it weren't true?
Jim Roth
@Daryl McBride The previous Minister did not give SNC a break from prosecution. She was moved in a cabinet shuffle. If the new Minister then gave SNC a break that would be suspicious, but that did not happen. The prosecution continued unchanged.
So the Conservative allegation is "you didn't do anything wrong, but we wish you had".
So the Conservative allegation is "you didn't do anything wrong, but we wish you had".
Jamie Gillis
@Jim Roth
What "Conservative allegation"?
What "Conservative allegation"?
Paul Doe
@Neil Turv
/sarcasm on
NO NO NO
It doesn't work that way.
We ignore when our side does something wrong, or we spin it so it was actually because the other side is evil. If the other side does something wrong, not only was it wrong in its own right, it is also a proper retort when our side does something wrong.
You must be a politics rookie.
/sarcasm off
/sarcasm on
NO NO NO
It doesn't work that way.
We ignore when our side does something wrong, or we spin it so it was actually because the other side is evil. If the other side does something wrong, not only was it wrong in its own right, it is also a proper retort when our side does something wrong.
You must be a politics rookie.
/sarcasm off
Tyler Brown
@George Halbert McKinney
At the same time this post magically received 150+ down votes a pro Trudeau post appears at the top of most liked with 150+ up votes , which appeared in minutes, to take top spot.
At the same time this post magically received 150+ down votes a pro Trudeau post appears at the top of most liked with 150+ up votes , which appeared in minutes, to take top spot.
Ron Brady
@George Halbert McKinney Yes I know. Both up and down votes were altered. I should have been more clear.
Murray Joah
@Tyler Brown
Get ready to be "disabled" for making THAT observation!!!
Get ready to be "disabled" for making THAT observation!!!
Allen Quisnel
@Murray Joah There are companies who actually work as 'commenters' who are in place to make people think popular opinion is a certain direction to sway public opinion. They have been active since 2002. "July 21, 2017 "Information Clearing House" - The Computational Propaganda Research Project (COMPROP) investigates the interaction of algorithms, automation and politics. This work includes analysis of how tools like social media bots are used to manipulate public opinion by amplifying or repressing political content, disinformation, hate speech, junk or fake news.
In their most recent report COMPROP have identified how organisations, often with public money, have created a system to help ‘define and manage what is in the best interest of the public.’
In their most recent report COMPROP have identified how organisations, often with public money, have created a system to help ‘define and manage what is in the best interest of the public.’
Neil Turv
@Paul Doe
Thanks Paul,
I am very aware that the quickest way to get a bunch of downvotes on this site is to state that neither side inherently evil or bad.
Thanks Paul,
I am very aware that the quickest way to get a bunch of downvotes on this site is to state that neither side inherently evil or bad.
Troy Mann
@Neil Turv
I agree
But people like Darryl here pretending to be non-partisan is simply out of touch with reality. He has a long history of supporting Saudi Arabia, China, Russia and Venezuela over Canada so home pretending to have an excuse is hilarious.
I agree
But people like Darryl here pretending to be non-partisan is simply out of touch with reality. He has a long history of supporting Saudi Arabia, China, Russia and Venezuela over Canada so home pretending to have an excuse is hilarious.
Neil Turv
@Troy Mann
Sure, but he's easily balanced out by James Holden,
And just as many people on the left defend China, Venezeual and other dictators on this site as right wing people. (Sharp and mccaig being the most prime examples).
Sure, but he's easily balanced out by James Holden,
And just as many people on the left defend China, Venezeual and other dictators on this site as right wing people. (Sharp and mccaig being the most prime examples).
Munroe Kelly
@Daryl McBride
“I’m confident that I did not act inappropriately but I think the essence of this is that people can experience interactions differently.”
Justin Trudeau
“I’m confident that I did not act inappropriately but I think the essence of this is that people can experience interactions differently.”
Justin Trudeau
Troy Mann
@Neil Turv
I disagree that as many defended China and Venezuela from the left than from conservatives on here.
Conservatives on here will always choose a foreign power over Canada. They have shown themselves very open on that, they cant ever phantom agreeing with Trudeau even when he is 100% right.
I disagreed with Harper on most things but still agreed with him on several. Conservatives will never say that, it goes against their beliefs. They would like to see Canada fail because to them it would make Trudeau look bad, ignoring the fact that Canada would fail. Trudeau looking bad is more important to them than Canada succeeding.
I disagree that as many defended China and Venezuela from the left than from conservatives on here.
Conservatives on here will always choose a foreign power over Canada. They have shown themselves very open on that, they cant ever phantom agreeing with Trudeau even when he is 100% right.
I disagreed with Harper on most things but still agreed with him on several. Conservatives will never say that, it goes against their beliefs. They would like to see Canada fail because to them it would make Trudeau look bad, ignoring the fact that Canada would fail. Trudeau looking bad is more important to them than Canada succeeding.
Greg Miller
@Daryl McBride SHADES OF TRUMP?
Neil Turv
@Troy Mann
Casting broad aspersions to any group isn't helpful
I'm a conservative supporter (ford notwithstanding) and support Trudeau on most immigration initiatives and tend to support the line he draws with totalitarian regimes.
Remember criticizing the tactics Trudeau uses to deal with these issues is not necessarily the same as supporting the dictator in question. It really isn't one or another and rarely is in any scenario, it's mostly grey.
Casting broad aspersions to any group isn't helpful
I'm a conservative supporter (ford notwithstanding) and support Trudeau on most immigration initiatives and tend to support the line he draws with totalitarian regimes.
Remember criticizing the tactics Trudeau uses to deal with these issues is not necessarily the same as supporting the dictator in question. It really isn't one or another and rarely is in any scenario, it's mostly grey.
Troy Mann
@Neil Turv
Criticizing tactics is one thing, usually offering up some type of alternative but the most liked posts in all those stories where partisan rants designed to give foreign powers partisan tools to use against Canada.
You know exactly what I am saying if you want to be non partisan about it.
Criticizing tactics is one thing, usually offering up some type of alternative but the most liked posts in all those stories where partisan rants designed to give foreign powers partisan tools to use against Canada.
You know exactly what I am saying if you want to be non partisan about it.
Mark Hammer
@Jim Roth
Correct. The PM could have moved the minister in another cabinet shuffle at any previous time, but did not until Scott Brison's resignation obliged a cabinet shuffle. If it was that serious, why wait, right?
Correct. The PM could have moved the minister in another cabinet shuffle at any previous time, but did not until Scott Brison's resignation obliged a cabinet shuffle. If it was that serious, why wait, right?
mike j malicki
@Daryl McBride ...Whats the chance SNC has deals with the U.N. ? I would say pretty good .
Ron Brady
@Daryl McBride For the record, this was the top post until 150 down votes magically appeared.
Tyler Brown
@Ron Brady
I noticed that too. A couple of hours ago it was 100 up votes to 10 down votes. I see the election interference has started early.
I noticed that too. A couple of hours ago it was 100 up votes to 10 down votes. I see the election interference has started early.
Jenna Collins
@Daryl McBride
Someone is playing with the likes/dislikes on this site again.
Someone is playing with the likes/dislikes on this site again.
Murray Joah
@Daryl McBride
SeeBeeSee continually disabling me for pointing out how the votes suddenly changed.
SeeBeeSee continually disabling me for pointing out how the votes suddenly changed.
Byron Whitford
@Murray Joah
They are doing it to me too.
They are doing it to me too.
Jenna Collins
@Murray Joah
The same thing is happening to me. Unbelievable that someone can manipulate the likes/dislikes in the Liberal's favour.
The same thing is happening to me. Unbelievable that someone can manipulate the likes/dislikes in the Liberal's favour.
George Halbert McKinney
@Ron Brady "this was the top post until 150 down votes magically appeared."
As far as I can tell from several years of observation, "down votes" have no effect on the "Most Liked" ranking.
It does appear that there are multiple campaigns attempting to change rankings, but I think that "Most Liked" entirely ignores the number of down votes.
As far as I can tell from several years of observation, "down votes" have no effect on the "Most Liked" ranking.
It does appear that there are multiple campaigns attempting to change rankings, but I think that "Most Liked" entirely ignores the number of down votes.
Byron Whitford
@George Halbert McKinney
You are correct. It only counts upvotes. The downvotes are for looks...
You are correct. It only counts upvotes. The downvotes are for looks...
David Amos
@Daryl McBride Methinks it would not be wise to believe the Globe and Mail or the PM N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Troy Mann "You know exactly what I am saying if you want to be non partisan about it."
Now thats funny
Now thats funny
Pam Sutton
"It’s hard not to feel disappointed in your government when every day there is a new scandal."
Justin Trudeau October 2013
Justin Trudeau October 2013
Edward Peter
@Pam Sutton
If there is one, and the scandal is not fake.
If there is one, and the scandal is not fake.
Al Kennedy
@Edward Peter
Unfortunately - "Wilson-Raybould refused Thursday to comment on the Globe's story, either to confirm or deny it."
Unfortunately - "Wilson-Raybould refused Thursday to comment on the Globe's story, either to confirm or deny it."
Lucas Williams
@Al Kennedy
And her refusal to comment, either to confirm or deny, says it all, doesn't it?
And her refusal to comment, either to confirm or deny, says it all, doesn't it?
Troy Mann
@Lucas Williams
How does refusing to make a statement give you the insight on her thoughts?
How does refusing to make a statement give you the insight on her thoughts?
Byron Whitford
@Troy Mann
"How does refusing to make a statement give you the insight on her thoughts?"
It is called deductive reasoning. If a lawyer won't outright refute a negative accusation chances are it has some sembelance of truth to it.
"How does refusing to make a statement give you the insight on her thoughts?"
It is called deductive reasoning. If a lawyer won't outright refute a negative accusation chances are it has some sembelance of truth to it.
Troy Mann
@Byron Whitford
If a lawyer hasn't read the report or have intimate knowledge on what is being asked they would state "I have no comment today" so they can obtain facts rather than hearsay...
Your reasoning is flawed, you are making an assumption based on no evidence.
If a lawyer hasn't read the report or have intimate knowledge on what is being asked they would state "I have no comment today" so they can obtain facts rather than hearsay...
Your reasoning is flawed, you are making an assumption based on no evidence.
Byron Whitford
@Troy Mann
If the lawyer is the one being accused and has direct knowledge of the situation and refuses to comment then you can make assumptions based on their non-answer. They don't need to read the report which in this case a news article she could read in 5 minutes THAT IS ALL ABOUT HER. If she hadn't read it by that time then that is a whole other problem.
If the lawyer is the one being accused and has direct knowledge of the situation and refuses to comment then you can make assumptions based on their non-answer. They don't need to read the report which in this case a news article she could read in 5 minutes THAT IS ALL ABOUT HER. If she hadn't read it by that time then that is a whole other problem.
Troy Mann
@Byron Whitford
You know what they say about making assumptions right
If she hasn't read or even knew about the article any lawyer would state "I have no comment today". Her statement using the word today is the indicator for me that she was blind sided and she knows better to say anything with out understanding the situation.
You know what they say about making assumptions right
If she hasn't read or even knew about the article any lawyer would state "I have no comment today". Her statement using the word today is the indicator for me that she was blind sided and she knows better to say anything with out understanding the situation.
Phil Mein
@Troy Mann "Your reasoning is flawed, you are making an assumption based on no evidence."
Oh the hypocrisy !
Oh the hypocrisy !
David Amos
@Troy Mann "any lawyer would state "I have no comment today"
Methinks you should have taken that advice as well N'esy Pas?
Methinks you should have taken that advice as well N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Byron Whitford "If a lawyer won't outright refute a negative accusation chances are it has some sembelance of truth to it."
Several lawyers pulled that trick on me yesterday during a hearing but I went around their nonsense
Several lawyers pulled that trick on me yesterday during a hearing but I went around their nonsense
Byron Whitford
@David Amos
They tried to avoid answering the question or implied you were guilty from your non-answers?
They tried to avoid answering the question or implied you were guilty from your non-answers?
David Amos
@Byron Whitford "They tried to avoid answering the question"
I am guilty of nothing I is me who is suing the Crown
I am guilty of nothing I is me who is suing the Crown
Byron Whitford
@David Amos
Nice. Just wanted clarification.
Nice. Just wanted clarification.
David Amos
@Byron Whitford FYI I was arguing the CROWN in Federal Court before former Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould was ever elected. Why she covered for Harper and Andy Scheer is still a mystery to me but no doubt it has something to do with me versus KPMG and that was what I was arguing yesterday with some interesting characters to say the least. One of them I ran against in 2004 after he turned coat on Harper's new Party and became a liberal like his buddy Brison who just quit as well
Methinks there are no coincidences N'esy Pas?
Jamie Gillis "
Having read the Globe and Mail's account, the information provided by sources is damning. "One well-connected Liberal with close ties to SNC-Lavalin said Ms. Wilson-Raybould “blew off the PMO” requests." In addition, "Sources at SNC-Lavalin told The Globe the PMO was furious with the justice minister’s intransigence on the remediation agreement and that the company was pleased to see her moved out of the portfolio."
All the information provided by sources in the article fits the facts. It looks pretty clear that the PMO, which was lobbied by SNC Lavalin 14 out of the 50 times they met with officials, are protecting the company and because Wilson-Raybould refused to do it, she was removed with someone who possibly will. This is possibly bigger than the Norman trial. I have to tip my hat to Wilson-Raybould: she stood up to the bullies in the PMO and seems to be remaining loyal. Make her leader of the Liberals!
All the information provided by sources in the article fits the facts. It looks pretty clear that the PMO, which was lobbied by SNC Lavalin 14 out of the 50 times they met with officials, are protecting the company and because Wilson-Raybould refused to do it, she was removed with someone who possibly will. This is possibly bigger than the Norman trial. I have to tip my hat to Wilson-Raybould: she stood up to the bullies in the PMO and seems to be remaining loyal. Make her leader of the Liberals!
James Holden
@Jamie Gillis
"the PMO was furious"
The story breaks down there as "the PMO" is not a single person. It is a large office with many people working.
Also the prosecution has not been set aside even with a new Justice MInister from Montreal.
"Sources from SNC-Lavalin" One of the most demonstrably corrupt companies in Canada, should not be believed without corroborative evidence.
This looks like dirty tricks of a type that Conservatives are well known for. Probably through their wholly owned subsidiary, the Ontario Proud boys.
"the PMO was furious"
The story breaks down there as "the PMO" is not a single person. It is a large office with many people working.
Also the prosecution has not been set aside even with a new Justice MInister from Montreal.
"Sources from SNC-Lavalin" One of the most demonstrably corrupt companies in Canada, should not be believed without corroborative evidence.
This looks like dirty tricks of a type that Conservatives are well known for. Probably through their wholly owned subsidiary, the Ontario Proud boys.
Jamie Gillis
@James Holden
1) Everybody knows that the PMO is not one person, but that it's routinely referred to that way. The same phrase was used to describe the fallout from the cabinet leak in the Norman case.
2) The new Justice Minister hasn't even been in for a month yet, so that he hasn't taken any action on this yet isn't indicative of anything.
3) Liberal insiders are also cited as sources in the Globe article.
4) Trying to drag the Conservatives into this wreaks of desperation on your part.
1) Everybody knows that the PMO is not one person, but that it's routinely referred to that way. The same phrase was used to describe the fallout from the cabinet leak in the Norman case.
2) The new Justice Minister hasn't even been in for a month yet, so that he hasn't taken any action on this yet isn't indicative of anything.
3) Liberal insiders are also cited as sources in the Globe article.
4) Trying to drag the Conservatives into this wreaks of desperation on your part.
Neil Turv
@James Holden
Your arguments against this article is essentially the written equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "lalalala".
Liberals are just as capable of cronyism and nepotism as the Conservatives, and the Proud Boys conspiracy theory has the merit of a flat earthers claims.
I stepped in a puddle yesterday that was much deeper than I thought, can you explain to me how Scheer orchestrated my wet foot?
Your arguments against this article is essentially the written equivalent of sticking your fingers in your ears and yelling "lalalala".
Liberals are just as capable of cronyism and nepotism as the Conservatives, and the Proud Boys conspiracy theory has the merit of a flat earthers claims.
I stepped in a puddle yesterday that was much deeper than I thought, can you explain to me how Scheer orchestrated my wet foot?
Al Kennedy
@James Holden
Your reply to the reported fact "One well-connected Liberal with close ties to SNC-Lavalin" is
"This looks like dirty tricks of a type that Conservatives are well known for"
LOL
Your reply to the reported fact "One well-connected Liberal with close ties to SNC-Lavalin" is
"This looks like dirty tricks of a type that Conservatives are well known for"
LOL
Troy Mann
@Neil Turv
Capable yes but instantly believing an anonymous source is a stretch at best. I shrugged off many of those accusations during the Harper years and will do so now.
Your way foot, well an insider of the conservatives party who wants to remain anonymous told me Sheer created the puddle. You believe me right, because of my anonymous source.
Capable yes but instantly believing an anonymous source is a stretch at best. I shrugged off many of those accusations during the Harper years and will do so now.
Your way foot, well an insider of the conservatives party who wants to remain anonymous told me Sheer created the puddle. You believe me right, because of my anonymous source.
Neil Turv
@Troy Mann
Like you I am withholding final judgement, but the G&M is hardly a far right source of information. While I will be happy to change my view, from what I have read in this case if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck it's probably a duck, and a cabinet shuffle to get the result you want is a fairly common practice in politics.
Like you I am withholding final judgement, but the G&M is hardly a far right source of information. While I will be happy to change my view, from what I have read in this case if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck it's probably a duck, and a cabinet shuffle to get the result you want is a fairly common practice in politics.
Troy Mann
@Neil Turv
But why wait for Brison to resign to make the shuffle happen? If Trudeau was furious he could have made the change long ago.
Fact remains unless the anonymous source reveals themself or Wilson agrees with the anonymous source we will never have enough facts to make a decision. So you are left with the duck situation and like I said before, I brushed aside many anonymous sources during the Harper years because it is futile.
But why wait for Brison to resign to make the shuffle happen? If Trudeau was furious he could have made the change long ago.
Fact remains unless the anonymous source reveals themself or Wilson agrees with the anonymous source we will never have enough facts to make a decision. So you are left with the duck situation and like I said before, I brushed aside many anonymous sources during the Harper years because it is futile.
Jamie Gillis
@Troy Mann
Troy, you forget, or perhaps were unaware, that the Globe article identifies one of those anonymous sources as a "well-connected Liberal with close ties to SNC-Lavalin" and that this individual said "Ms. Wilson-Raybould “blew off the PMO” requests."
Are you saying this Liberal isn't a Liberal at all? Or Are you suggesting this Liberal made it up, along with any other sources telling the same story?
Troy, you forget, or perhaps were unaware, that the Globe article identifies one of those anonymous sources as a "well-connected Liberal with close ties to SNC-Lavalin" and that this individual said "Ms. Wilson-Raybould “blew off the PMO” requests."
Are you saying this Liberal isn't a Liberal at all? Or Are you suggesting this Liberal made it up, along with any other sources telling the same story?
Jamie Gillis
@Troy Mann "But why wait for Brison to resign to make the shuffle happen? If Trudeau was furious he could have made the change long ago."
Optics.
Optics.
Stanley Baird
@Jamie Gillis Let's see what all the fact are, but the removal of Wilson-Raybould has not yet been explained and so far this is the only explanation.
Jamie Gillis
@Stanley Baird
Well we have no choice but to wait. But there's no getting around it: none of this looks good.
Well we have no choice but to wait. But there's no getting around it: none of this looks good.
Troy Mann
@Jamie Gillis "
Are you saying this Liberal isn't a Liberal at all? Or Are you suggesting this Liberal made it up, along with any other sources telling the same story"
Who are the other sources other than anonymous?
I rolled my eyes at many of the anonymous accusations against Harper and I will continue to do so while Trudeau is PM and whomever is next.
Anonymous accusations are useless until they are verified even when I dont like the person being accused.
Are you saying this Liberal isn't a Liberal at all? Or Are you suggesting this Liberal made it up, along with any other sources telling the same story"
Who are the other sources other than anonymous?
I rolled my eyes at many of the anonymous accusations against Harper and I will continue to do so while Trudeau is PM and whomever is next.
Anonymous accusations are useless until they are verified even when I dont like the person being accused.
David Amos
@Troy Mann I am not anonymous
Daryl McBride
It wouldn't be the first time the Liberals have tried to intervene, the Stanley trial comes to mind.
Jack O Hill
@Daryl McBride
As well as the PM announcing that the investigation in VAdm Norman was certain to end up in court.
As well as the PM announcing that the investigation in VAdm Norman was certain to end up in court.
Irv Millar
@Daryl McBride Did you even read the articles from the Globe and Mail?
To quote: "The Globe and Mail never reported that officials in Mr. Trudeau's office had directed Ms. Wilson-Raybould to take action--only that she was pressured to do so and declined.
Well the PM/PMO have said otherwise. The only other party to make statements would be SNC Lavalin. Go figure eh?
To quote: "The Globe and Mail never reported that officials in Mr. Trudeau's office had directed Ms. Wilson-Raybould to take action--only that she was pressured to do so and declined.
Well the PM/PMO have said otherwise. The only other party to make statements would be SNC Lavalin. Go figure eh?
Troy Mann
@Irv Millar
Conservatives slinging mud in every direction hoping something sticks yet anonymous sources are rarely reliable.
Conservatives slinging mud in every direction hoping something sticks yet anonymous sources are rarely reliable.
Phil Mein
@Troy Mann "Conservatives slinging mud in every direction hoping something sticks yet anonymous sources are rarely reliable."
Sounds like you're adopting Trump's style , looks good on you. LOL
Sounds like you're adopting Trump's style , looks good on you. LOL
David Amos
@Troy Mann I repeat I am not anonymous and you have never dared to argue even once Correct?
David Amos
@Irv Millar "The straws are being grasped. A mountain and the mole hill. The only way the Conservatives know how to govern. In blame, but no self-blame. There's mirrors for that eh?"
Methinks it must have felt good to be at the top of the heep or awhile N'esy Pas?
Methinks it must have felt good to be at the top of the heep or awhile N'esy Pas?
Adam Smith
His nose is getting longer.
Reid Fleming
@Adam Smith And his tenure is getting shorter...
Stanley Baird
@Adam Smith did the last Liberal majority also go down due to scandal in Quebec?
Troy Mann
@Stanley Baird
I remember the last conservative majority went down due to failed policies that lead us into a recession...
I remember the last conservative majority went down due to failed policies that lead us into a recession...
Ryan Tulson
The recession was world wide and Canada came out on top! You may want to climb out from under the rock you were under for the last 20 years
David Amos
@Troy Mann "I remember the last conservative majority went down due to failed policies that lead us into a recession..."
Do you recall the reasons that you did not vote or me in 2006?
Do you recall the reasons that you did not vote or me in 2006?
Richard Dekkar
This is headline news and it's buried in the Politics section on this site. Did the PMO send those instructions too?
Daryl McBride
@Richard Dekkar Of course he did.
Sophia Riangulo
@Richard Dekkar Shows up on the front page as the first article and a large photo for me.
Richard Dekkar
@Sophia Riangulo
Yes thanks, it does for me now too. It didn't appear there at first but even our public broadcaster can't hide this one.
Yes thanks, it does for me now too. It didn't appear there at first but even our public broadcaster can't hide this one.
David Amos
@Richard Dekkar Of that I have no doubt
bill chagwich
I will be voting A Scheer conservatives in the next election, Canadians deserve better, enough is enough
Graham Greene
@bill chagwich
I thought you wanted 'better'??
I thought you wanted 'better'??
Stephen David
@bill chagwich
Well said....as will many Canadians. Enough is enough already.
Well said....as will many Canadians. Enough is enough already.
Arthur Gill
@Graham Greene
That is what he said. What makes you think he is wrong?
That is what he said. What makes you think he is wrong?
Graham Greene
@Arthur Gill
Scheer. And face of Pierre P. among others . . . .
Scheer. And face of Pierre P. among others . . . .
Arthur Gill
@Graham Greene
That is not an answer.
That is not an answer.
Chuck MacDonald
@bill chagwich I SECOND THAT
Troy Mann
@Arthur Gill
Provide one policy Sheer has that will make things better?
Allowing Quebec to collect federal taxes?
The suggestion that there will be no 'scandals' especially from anonymous sources with Sheer as leader is just silly talk at best. There was this type of stuff on a daily basis when Harper was PM and conservatives in chorus all said "but but Chretien"
Provide one policy Sheer has that will make things better?
Allowing Quebec to collect federal taxes?
The suggestion that there will be no 'scandals' especially from anonymous sources with Sheer as leader is just silly talk at best. There was this type of stuff on a daily basis when Harper was PM and conservatives in chorus all said "but but Chretien"
David Amos
@Troy Mann "but but Chretien"
Methinks you know what happened between Chretien and I N'esy Pas?
Methinks you know what happened between Chretien and I N'esy Pas?
Jamie Gillis
Wilson-Raybould's "shuffle" out of the Justice file was not well received among many communities and Canadians. This is going to add a lot of salt to that wound. Heh, unless you believe Trudeau.
Seriously, the Globe article is worth the subscription. The details are jaw dropping.
Seriously, the Globe article is worth the subscription. The details are jaw dropping.
Stanley Baird
@Jamie Gillis disappointing that the PM or PMO would interfere with the courts while the PM tells China that he cannot do such things in Canada.
David Amos
@Stanley Baird Surprise Surprise Surprise
bobby ornstein
People in the PMO today running around with their Armani pants on fire ...
Ted Wach
@bobby ornstein Hopefully the socks don't get consumed....
Jan Rose
@bobby ornstein Wow, the paid bots are out on this one.
David Amos
@bobby ornstein Methinks the antics of the boyz in shorts pants in the PCO must be quite a circus too N'esy Pas?
John Wakefield
Trudeau and ethics issues again! When does it end? October 2019?
Billie-Bob Brown
@John Wakefield
You mean like the other ethics matters that were really no big deal, when the actual facts are fully understood?
You mean like the other ethics matters that were really no big deal, when the actual facts are fully understood?
John Wakefield
@Billie-Bob Brown
So the elaborate expensive trip to the Aga Khan's private island for Trudeau and his entourage, and the $50 million he gave to the Aga Khan are just an inconvenient coincidence....
So the elaborate expensive trip to the Aga Khan's private island for Trudeau and his entourage, and the $50 million he gave to the Aga Khan are just an inconvenient coincidence....
Billie-Bob Brown
@John Wakefield
No evidence of influence that benefited the Aga Khan. Only minor breaches of reporting to the many bodies that are officially required to be reported to (with each lack of reporting being counted as a separate 'ethics' issue by some people)
No evidence of influence that benefited the Aga Khan. Only minor breaches of reporting to the many bodies that are officially required to be reported to (with each lack of reporting being counted as a separate 'ethics' issue by some people)
Billie-Bob Brown
@John Wakefield
I suppose some people also believe that Trudeau tweeting Canada's commitment to support girl's education in developing nations to Trevor Noah during his hosting of a fund raiser in SA is also an 'ethical violation that benefited Trevor Noah'.
I suppose some people also believe that Trudeau tweeting Canada's commitment to support girl's education in developing nations to Trevor Noah during his hosting of a fund raiser in SA is also an 'ethical violation that benefited Trevor Noah'.
David Amos
@John Wakefield "Trudeau and ethics issues again! When does it end? October 2019?"
Methinks that many will agree that Trudeau The Younger and his cohorts will win again because Harper 2.0 and his old buddy Maxime will split the vote on the right and the NDP will sink even further under their current leadership However whatever way it turns out it will be an entertaining circus from now until polling day N'esy Pas?
Methinks that many will agree that Trudeau The Younger and his cohorts will win again because Harper 2.0 and his old buddy Maxime will split the vote on the right and the NDP will sink even further under their current leadership However whatever way it turns out it will be an entertaining circus from now until polling day N'esy Pas?
Robert Fournier
This certainly explains credibly why the minister was demoted from Justice to Veterans affairs
Stanley Baird
@Robert Fournier so our self-proclaimed feminist PM may have demoted the minister of Justice when she refused to act improperly in this case at his request? His actions tell me all I need to know about his feminist and ethical credentials - he can stop lecturing the rest of us now, thanks.
David Amos
@Robert Fournier Methinks a lot of Veterans do not consider it a demotion N'esy Pas?
Steve Sax
Apparently the Globe and Mail isn’t good enough for the CBC as a news source. They only believe the LPC as a news source
Eileen Kinley
@Steve Sax
They're reporting it.
They're reporting it.
Shawn Pieterson
@Steve Sax
Globe and mail doesn't pay the bills, sorry.
Globe and mail doesn't pay the bills, sorry.
Jamie Gillis
@Eileen Kinley
The only thing the CBC has really reported here is that Trudeau is saying "No I didn't!" Read the Globe article. The information from sources, both Liberals and SNC Lavalin, are staggering.
The only thing the CBC has really reported here is that Trudeau is saying "No I didn't!" Read the Globe article. The information from sources, both Liberals and SNC Lavalin, are staggering.
Steve Sax
@Eileen Kinley
They were kinda forced to report on another news sources report
They were kinda forced to report on another news sources report
David Amos
@Steve Sax "Apparently the Globe and Mail isn’t good enough for the CBC as a news source"
Methinks the CBC are not alone in that regard N'esy Pas?
Methinks the CBC are not alone in that regard N'esy Pas?
Tim O'Day
I'm amazed that the Globe story made it's way past the Guardians at Trudeau's Ministry of Truth and Sunny Ways.
Maybe the Globe's share of the $595 Million hasn't been received yet?
Maybe the Globe's share of the $595 Million hasn't been received yet?
David Amos
@Tim O'Day Methinks everybody knows that the Globe and Mai leans to the right N'esy Pas?
Nico De Jong
Why is it that whenever Liberals are in government, within a few short years the whole scene just reeks of corrup tion?
Michael Taylor
@Nico De Jong
so far nothing compares with Duffy-gate. Harper still outnumbers the libs on corruption scandals.
so far nothing compares with Duffy-gate. Harper still outnumbers the libs on corruption scandals.
Richard Ade
@Nico De Jong The most surprising thing is the people that keep voting for them and supporting them. What have they delivered? Pot, more debts, bad trade deals USMCA, ....
Eileen Kinley
@Nico De Jong
Yeah, the CPC are able to hide it longer.
Yeah, the CPC are able to hide it longer.
Jason James
@Nico De Jong
Same can be said of the Conservatives. No government is immune to corruption.
Same can be said of the Conservatives. No government is immune to corruption.
Dave Edwards
@Eileen Kinley That's not a denial of Liberal corruption.
If anything you're admitting that the Conservatives seem to know what they're doing better than the Liberals.
If anything you're admitting that the Conservatives seem to know what they're doing better than the Liberals.
Brian Rose
@Nico De Jong have something to do with PQ
Dale Bengtzen
@Jason James
This isn't about the Conservatives.
This isn't about the Conservatives.
Eileen Kinley
@Dave Edwards
Why would I deny Liberal corruption? I'm waiting for more information on this situation.
Why would I deny Liberal corruption? I'm waiting for more information on this situation.
Jason James
@Dale Bengtzen
No but when someone acts like ONLY the Liberals are corrupt, it needs to be brought up that there are other political parties who are as well.
No but when someone acts like ONLY the Liberals are corrupt, it needs to be brought up that there are other political parties who are as well.
Nico De Jong
@Nico De Jong
bEcause IT'S THE LIBERAL WAY ?
bEcause IT'S THE LIBERAL WAY ?
Irv Millar
@Nico De Jong Not sure. Maybe ask Steve, Mike, Ernie, Grant, Brad or Jason?
Dan Desormeaux
@Dave Edwards some people are not blind party stooges. Do you disagree that MOST politicians are corrupt or corruptible?
Andy Steinbach
@Jason James
Well, that's just called deflection because this story is about Trudeau and the Liberals...
Well, that's just called deflection because this story is about Trudeau and the Liberals...
David Amos
@Nico De Jong Methinks the same can be said of any government N'esy Pas?
David Amos
@Dan Desormeaux "Do you disagree that MOST politicians are corrupt or corruptible?"
Methinks everybody knows that is the reason I sued the Crown and have run against all the political parties six times thus far N'esy Pas?
Methinks everybody knows that is the reason I sued the Crown and have run against all the political parties six times thus far N'esy Pas?
John Smith
Sorry Trudeau but you're a listen and believe feminist. Accusations equal proof for you. I'm gonna take a page out of the progressive (your) hand book and take these accusations as true even without a shred of evidence and hold them against you. You reap what you sow pal.
Tony Belmore
@John Smith Ya!
Tom Simpson
@John Smith
Wow. You know, I know you post a lot of BS like this but c'mon... Those two things are so different in scope. I mean.. it's just ridiculous.
Wow. You know, I know you post a lot of BS like this but c'mon... Those two things are so different in scope. I mean.. it's just ridiculous.
John Smith
@Tom Simpson What's different? You like the person being accused without proof this time?
Tom Simpson
@John Smith
I'm not even going to get into this with you. It's just ignorant.
I'm not even going to get into this with you. It's just ignorant.
John Smith
@Tom Simpson You're not going to get into this because you know you're wrong.
Tom Simpson
@John Smith
I'm really not though John. I'm really not.
I'm really not though John. I'm really not.
John Smith
@Tom Simpson care to offer an explanation of why you're not wrong? or are you going to stop at a simple claim and hope hope that's enough to prove something?
Alanna Logan
@Tom Simpson not too much support for your so called right position. Might be time to reevaluate.
Randy A. Selkirk
@John Smith Good one John , good one !
Tom Simpson
@Alanna Logan
The allegations may be true and it may not be. That's my stance on it. We barely know anything about it yet.
The allegations may be true and it may not be. That's my stance on it. We barely know anything about it yet.
Tom Simpson
@John Smith
Like I said John, I really hope you know why comparing the two is way out of scope. I really hope you do.
Like I said John, I really hope you know why comparing the two is way out of scope. I really hope you do.
John Smith
@Tom Simpson I do but the act of punishing someone without proof is equally wrong in either scenario.
Tom Simpson
@John Smith
That's certainly a good point. However, that isn't always possible.
That's certainly a good point. However, that isn't always possible.
Jim Lauzon
@John Smith
it wasn't "Listen and believe" when JT was the accused sexual offender either.
it wasn't "Listen and believe" when JT was the accused sexual offender either.
David Amos
@Jim Lauzon True
David Amos
@John Smith "care to offer an explanation of why you're not wrong? or are you going to stop at a simple claim and hope hope that's enough to prove something?"
Methinks Trudeau the Younger and his latest Minister of Justice should review paragraph 83 of my statement of claim In Federal Court I filed it when Harper was the PM N'esy Pas?
Methinks Trudeau the Younger and his latest Minister of Justice should review paragraph 83 of my statement of claim In Federal Court I filed it when Harper was the PM N'esy Pas?
Pam Sutton
When asked about this on camera, Trudeau looked like he was about to start crying.
Ricky Weston
@Pam Sutton I think he may of wet his pants.
Mike Irvine
@Pam Sutton ROFLMAO!
Angus Mackenzie
@Pam Sutton It's the default position for a child in trouble.
Sand In
@Pam Sutton
again...
again...
David Amos
@Angus Mackenzie "It's the default position for a child in trouble."
Oh So True
Oh So True
Steve Sax
Irvings
McCains
SNC Lavilian
Bombardier
Seem to own the Liberals
McCains
SNC Lavilian
Bombardier
Seem to own the Liberals
Paul Underhill
Suggest looking into a long time connection between a particular Canadian family
and the Trudeaus, Mulroneys and the Chretiens.
and the Trudeaus, Mulroneys and the Chretiens.
@Steve Sax Need to add the Bronfmans and Desmarais to that list
David Amos
@Steve Sax I wholeheartedly agree
David Amos
@ "Need to add the Bronfmans and Desmarais to that list"
YUP BUT
Methinks everybody would like to know who I am agreeing with N'esy Pas?
YUP BUT
Methinks everybody would like to know who I am agreeing with N'esy Pas?
John Paul Maxwell
All this in just 3 years.Wow!!
David Amos
@John Paul Maxwell Methinks there were a lots sunny days within those 3 years for Trudeau the Younger to enjoy N'esy Pas?
Pam Sutton
"Low income Canadians don't pay taxes, AND my high income corporate pals don't go to court" - Justin Trudeau
Richard Riel
@Pam Sutton And in many cases don't pay taxes whatsoever.
Michael Brown
@Richard Riel Really? I'd love to see your evidence.
Edward Peter
@Pam Sutton
Said when, under what condition, or just another misleading comment?
Said when, under what condition, or just another misleading comment?
David Amos
@Pam Sutton "Low income Canadians don't pay taxes, AND my high income corporate pals don't go to court" - Justin Trudeau
Say it again Pam
Say it again Pam
Nico De Jong
Perfect time to take a walk in the snow, Trudeau.
Do Canada, and yourself - a huge favour, and do just that.
Don't worry, your career at the UN is secure - the more experience you have at alleged corruption, the better your resume looks to them.
Do Canada, and yourself - a huge favour, and do just that.
Don't worry, your career at the UN is secure - the more experience you have at alleged corruption, the better your resume looks to them.
Mike Irvine
@Nico De Jong make the walk up by Ft Mac and its -50C
Brad Mercier
@Mike Irvine
Must be the AGW.
Must be the AGW.
Andrew Hanson
@Nico De Jong blah blah blah .
Alan Humphreys
@Andrew Hanson-"blah blah blah"? I dazzled by your contribution! And your next defence submission will be?
David Amos
@Nico De Jong "Perfect time to take a walk in the snow, Trudeau"
Methinks we can only just watch Trudeau The Younger look for his Father's tracks in the snow of long ago N'esy Pas?
Methinks we can only just watch Trudeau The Younger look for his Father's tracks in the snow of long ago N'esy Pas?
Trudeau under fire over claim he pressured justice minister to intervene in SNC-Lavalin fraud case
Company facing charges of fraud and corruption in connection with payments to Libyan officials
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau found himself in the opposition's crosshairs Thursday following a report that he pressed former Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould to intervene in the prosecution of construction giant SNC-Lavalin on charges of fraud and corruption.
Trudeau denied today that he or his staff "directed" Wilson-Raybould to intervene. At one point, in reply to a journalist's question, he said in French that he never "asked" her to make any decisions in the case.
"The allegations in the Globe story this morning are false," Trudeau told reporters during a Toronto-area news conference Thursday morning.
"Neither the current nor the previous attorney general was ever directed by me, or by anyone in my office, to take a decision in this matter."
However, Trudeau's denial did little to satisfy the opposition Conservatives and New Democrats. The allegations, made by unnamed sources to the Globe and Mail, dominated Thursday's question period.
"We have heard the prime minister's very carefully scripted legalistic answer," said Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer. "But the question is, did anyone in the Prime Minister's Office at any time communicate with anyone in the former attorney general's office on the matter of the criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin — yes or no?"
Guy Caron, parliamentary leader for the New Democratic Party, drew a link between the allegations and illegal political donations the company has made in the past.
"SNC-Lavalin illegally gave more than $110,000 to the Liberal Party and its (riding) associations.
Today, SNC-Lavalin needs a helping hand because they are in trouble," Caron said, pointing out that the company had lobbied the government more than 50 times in the past two years.
"The justice minister was fired and everybody asked why. Was she fired because the bottom line is a friend is a friend?"
Current Justice Minister David Lametti was forced to field question after question, repeating Trudeau's response from earlier in the day and saying he personally had received no pressure or directives to intervene in the case.
Meanwhile, the woman at the centre of the storm remained silent. Wilson-Raybould, who was moved out of the prestigious Justice portfolio to Veterans Affairs last month, refused to answer reporters' questions Thursday — either to back up her boss or to deny the Globe and Mail's report.
The Globe and Mail story said Wilson-Raybould was shuffled from her portfolio after she refused to ask federal prosecutors to make a plea bargain deal with Montreal-based SNC-Lavalin. The newspaper, citing anonymous sources, said Trudeau's office tried to press Wilson-Raybould to intervene in the prosecution of SNC Lavalin.
CBC News has not independently verified the allegations.
Bill Wilson, Wilson-Raybould's father and a Kwakwaka'wakw hereditary chief in B.C., told CBC News his daughter has an iron will and will emerge from this scandal clean.
"If she or I had been purchasable at some point in time in our political career, it never happened, it didn't happen and will never happen," said Wilson.
"If this mess comes out as messy as I imagine it might be, she will be one of the few people that won't get any dirt on her."
SNC-Lavalin is before a court in Montreal, charged with fraud and corruption in connection with payments of nearly $48 million to public officials in Libya under Moammar Gadhafi's government and allegations it defrauded Libyan organizations of an estimated $130 million.
The company is contesting the case and has pleaded not guilty. The case is at the preliminary hearing stage.
If convicted, the company could be blocked from competing for federal government contracts for a decade.
In 2013, SNC-Lavalin was debarred from competing on any project financed by the World Bank for 10 years following an investigation into allegations of bribery schemes involving the company and officials in Bangladesh.
On Friday, former SNC-Lavalin CEO Pierre Duhaime pleaded guilty to helping a public servant commit breach of trust in a deal that resulted in 20 months of house arrest, 240 hours of community service and a $200,000 donation to a fund for victims of crime.
In late November, the company's former vice-president Normand Morin pleaded guilty to charges of violating Canada's election financing rules through an elaborate scheme that sent more than $117,000 to the federal Liberal and Conservative parties and to individual candidates.
The company maintains that the charges resulted from the actions of former executives and it is under new management. It says it has cleaned up its act.
On Thursday, it refused all comment.
According to the Globe and Mail's report, SNC-Lavalin lobbied Trudeau's government to agree to a deferred prosecution agreement or remediation agreement. In such cases, the prosecution is set aside; in return, the company admits responsibility and takes remedial steps, such as paying a fine or adopting compliance rules.
To date, the Public Prosecution Service has refused to negotiate a deal with SNC-Lavalin. The company has challenged that decision.
According to the anonymous sources cited by the Globe and Mail, unidentified officials in Trudeau's office pressed Wilson-Raybould to use her power to intervene.
Scheer described the allegations as very troubling and called on Trudeau to tell Canadians what happened.
"It is clear that the prime minister is hiding something because he wasn't very transparent, he didn't respond to the other questions and he returned to one line that sounded like it was constructed by lawyers," he told reporters.
Scheer said his party will explore all options to pursue the allegation. "All the options are on the table," he said, refusing to spell out what he had in mind.
Scheer also didn't say whether a Conservative government would have granted SNC-Lavalin's request for a remediation agreement.
"If there is going to be any discussion from very high levels in the government to grant an exemption or an alternative measure to a company when we're talking about very serious prosecutions, that must be done with full transparency and this is not what we're seeing here," he said.
"We're talking about allegations the prime minister or his office exerted a great deal of pressure and when they didn't get the answer they liked, they fired the minister of justice."
Meanwhile, a former Saskatchewan judge says the RCMP needs to investigate the allegations. Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, currently director of the University of British Columbia's Indian Residential School History and Dialogue Centre, told CBC News a federal police investigation is necessary to restore public confidence in the administration of justice.
Elizabeth Thompson can be reached at elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca
Trudeau denied today that he or his staff "directed" Wilson-Raybould to intervene. At one point, in reply to a journalist's question, he said in French that he never "asked" her to make any decisions in the case.
"The allegations in the Globe story this morning are false," Trudeau told reporters during a Toronto-area news conference Thursday morning.
"Neither the current nor the previous attorney general was ever directed by me, or by anyone in my office, to take a decision in this matter."
"We have heard the prime minister's very carefully scripted legalistic answer," said Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer. "But the question is, did anyone in the Prime Minister's Office at any time communicate with anyone in the former attorney general's office on the matter of the criminal prosecution of SNC-Lavalin — yes or no?"
Guy Caron, parliamentary leader for the New Democratic Party, drew a link between the allegations and illegal political donations the company has made in the past.
"SNC-Lavalin illegally gave more than $110,000 to the Liberal Party and its (riding) associations.
Today, SNC-Lavalin needs a helping hand because they are in trouble," Caron said, pointing out that the company had lobbied the government more than 50 times in the past two years.
"The justice minister was fired and everybody asked why. Was she fired because the bottom line is a friend is a friend?"
Current Justice Minister David Lametti was forced to field question after question, repeating Trudeau's response from earlier in the day and saying he personally had received no pressure or directives to intervene in the case.
Meanwhile, the woman at the centre of the storm remained silent. Wilson-Raybould, who was moved out of the prestigious Justice portfolio to Veterans Affairs last month, refused to answer reporters' questions Thursday — either to back up her boss or to deny the Globe and Mail's report.
The Globe and Mail story said Wilson-Raybould was shuffled from her portfolio after she refused to ask federal prosecutors to make a plea bargain deal with Montreal-based SNC-Lavalin. The newspaper, citing anonymous sources, said Trudeau's office tried to press Wilson-Raybould to intervene in the prosecution of SNC Lavalin.
CBC News has not independently verified the allegations.
Bill Wilson, Wilson-Raybould's father and a Kwakwaka'wakw hereditary chief in B.C., told CBC News his daughter has an iron will and will emerge from this scandal clean.
"If she or I had been purchasable at some point in time in our political career, it never happened, it didn't happen and will never happen," said Wilson.
"If this mess comes out as messy as I imagine it might be, she will be one of the few people that won't get any dirt on her."
The company is contesting the case and has pleaded not guilty. The case is at the preliminary hearing stage.
If convicted, the company could be blocked from competing for federal government contracts for a decade.
In 2013, SNC-Lavalin was debarred from competing on any project financed by the World Bank for 10 years following an investigation into allegations of bribery schemes involving the company and officials in Bangladesh.
On Friday, former SNC-Lavalin CEO Pierre Duhaime pleaded guilty to helping a public servant commit breach of trust in a deal that resulted in 20 months of house arrest, 240 hours of community service and a $200,000 donation to a fund for victims of crime.
In late November, the company's former vice-president Normand Morin pleaded guilty to charges of violating Canada's election financing rules through an elaborate scheme that sent more than $117,000 to the federal Liberal and Conservative parties and to individual candidates.
The company maintains that the charges resulted from the actions of former executives and it is under new management. It says it has cleaned up its act.
On Thursday, it refused all comment.
According to the Globe and Mail's report, SNC-Lavalin lobbied Trudeau's government to agree to a deferred prosecution agreement or remediation agreement. In such cases, the prosecution is set aside; in return, the company admits responsibility and takes remedial steps, such as paying a fine or adopting compliance rules.
To date, the Public Prosecution Service has refused to negotiate a deal with SNC-Lavalin. The company has challenged that decision.
According to the anonymous sources cited by the Globe and Mail, unidentified officials in Trudeau's office pressed Wilson-Raybould to use her power to intervene.
Scheer described the allegations as very troubling and called on Trudeau to tell Canadians what happened.
"It is clear that the prime minister is hiding something because he wasn't very transparent, he didn't respond to the other questions and he returned to one line that sounded like it was constructed by lawyers," he told reporters.
Scheer said his party will explore all options to pursue the allegation. "All the options are on the table," he said, refusing to spell out what he had in mind.
Scheer also didn't say whether a Conservative government would have granted SNC-Lavalin's request for a remediation agreement.
"If there is going to be any discussion from very high levels in the government to grant an exemption or an alternative measure to a company when we're talking about very serious prosecutions, that must be done with full transparency and this is not what we're seeing here," he said.
"We're talking about allegations the prime minister or his office exerted a great deal of pressure and when they didn't get the answer they liked, they fired the minister of justice."
Meanwhile, a former Saskatchewan judge says the RCMP needs to investigate the allegations. Mary Ellen Turpel-Lafond, currently director of the University of British Columbia's Indian Residential School History and Dialogue Centre, told CBC News a federal police investigation is necessary to restore public confidence in the administration of justice.
Elizabeth Thompson can be reached at elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca
CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices