https://archive.org/details/RogersTalkshowBuffoons

 Rogers Talkshow Buffoons

by    David Raymond Amos


Topics   RCMP, FBI

Andy Baby Kyrstal and Tommy Boy Young ain't got nothing on this mean
old Maritimer


Todd Veinotte
Reporter

Todd Veinotte joins Global News New Brunswick as a veteran reporter
with more than 20 years in the media.

He has worked in print, radio and television and held many positions
including; reporter, anchor, news director and producer.

Todd has hosted a regional radio talk show for four years (The Todd
Veinotte Show) which was heard throughout the Maritimes including
Saint John, Moncton and Halifax.

He also helped produce a twice-weekly podcast for three years as well,
primarily talk-show format covering everything and anything.

Todd is based out of Saint John.


Dan Ahlstrand

The news business has certainly taken Dan to places all over the
country. After spending part of his life in the Canadian Armed Forces,
Dan graduated from Confederation College’s radio and television
program and took his first gig in the paper-making town of Dryden,
Ontario. From there it was to Thunder Bay for a stint at Dougall Media
and then off to Owen Sound and Bayshore Broadcasting. When Rogers
Media decided to launch three news-talk stations in Atlantic Canada,
Dan jumped at the opportunity. First at an anchor at News 91.9 in
Moncton, then as the host of The Drive with Dan Ahlstrand and then The
New Brunswick Morning News. Dan is now the news director at CityNews
95.7 and co-anchors All News Mornings on each weekday morning from 6
a.m. to 10 a.m. When not working away in the newsroom you can find Dan
chasing a trout on a stream, watching his beloved Everton on the
pitch, or quietly hoping that Toronto will find a way to win the
Stanley Cup.

Email   dan.ahlstrand@news957.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1azdNWbF3A&t=183s&ab_channel=DavidAmos

Me,Myself and I
383 views
Apr 2, 2013
David Amos
45 subscribers


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ca6Egqghmw&ab_channel=DavidAmos

Tom Young
91 views
Dec 12, 2012
David Amos
45 subscribers



..

https://halifax.citynews.ca/local-news/andrew-krystal-former-citynews-halifax-talk-show-host-dies-5397615

Andrew Krystal, former CityNews Halifax talk show host, dies
Krystal was the first host of Maritime Morning when News 95.7 launched in 2005
Dan Ahlstrand Dan Ahlstrand
May 23, 2022 9:45 AM

andrew krystal
Andrew KrystalTwitter/@andrewkrystal
Listen to this article
00:01:12

Andrew Krystal has passed away.

The former Halifax radio talk show host died Sunday in Toronto.

Krystal started his broadcast career in Toronto before moving to
Halifax to help launch what was News 95.7 in 2005.

He and Maritime Morning became a very popular part of the fledgling
station as his beloved "Krystal Nation" grew.

Krystal joined The Todd Veinotte Show in November of 2020, where he
discussed his role as a talk show host.

"We approach journalism, but we're not journalists. Ultimately we are
entertainers," he stated. "I do the best I can. You don't go on and be
mean to everybody, but you can't go on always kissing up, there has to
be a range."

"You're compassionate, you're aggressive, you're understanding, you're
insightful. Hopefully you're prepared, you're intelligent and you're
well read. Those are important things."

In July of 2010, Krystal left Halifax and returned to Toronto where he
was heard on Sportsnet The Fan 590 and seen on CityNews Toronto.

From there he continued in talk radio with a show on SiriusXM, and
also formed his own communications company.

Funeral details have not yet been released.



https://halifax.citynews.ca/nova-scotia-news/families-of-ns-mass-shooting-victims-end-boycott-will-return-to-inquiry-hearings-5441145

Families of N.S. mass shooting victims end boycott, will return to
inquiry hearings

HALIFAX — Lawyers representing the relatives of the 22 people murdered
in the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting will retake their seats at next
week's mass casualty commission hearings, but they say their clients'
lack of confidence in the process remai
Lyndsay Armstrong, The Canadian Press
Jun 3, 2022 5:15 PM

20220603150620-629a5efc09798d52d0ddf247jpeg
Tara Miller, a lawyer who represents family members of Aaron Tuck and
Kristen Beaton, addresses the Mass Casualty Commission inquiry into
the mass murders in rural Nova Scotia on April 18/19, 2020, in Halifax
on Thursday, March 3, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Andrew Vaughan

HALIFAX — Lawyers representing the relatives of the 22 people murdered
in the 2020 Nova Scotia mass shooting will retake their seats at next
week's mass casualty commission hearings, but they say their clients'
lack of confidence in the process remains.

Tara Miller, a lawyer representing the family of two victims, said in
an interview Friday she will return to the public hearings beginning
Monday, but “our return next week is by no means an endorsement of the
decision made by the commissioners,” who prevented cross-examination
of key Mountie witnesses.

Last week, lawyers representing the majority of the 22 victims’
families boycotted the commission proceedings at the direction of
their clients. This was in response to the decision to prevent the
families’ lawyers from directly questioning Staff Sgt. Brian Rehill
and Sgt. Andy O’Brien.

“They’ve lost confidence,” Miller said. “While the lawyers will be
there next week, I’m not sure what clients will be there."

The commission said they agreed to allow the two witnesses to avoid
being cross-examined and to testify through video instead of in person
due to the officers' unspecified health concerns. In response, the
families of victims took to the streets last week in protest.

Patterson Law, which represents 14 of 22 families, said in a statement
last week that their clients are "disheartened and further
traumatized" by the commission's decision. Patterson Law lawyer
Michael Scott said in an email Friday his team will attend public
proceedings next week.

Miller said that on May 30, she told the commission she planned to
table a motion amending the rules so family participants can question
witnesses directly. She said she is waiting to hear back from the
commission. The motion, she explained, is critical toward restoring
confidence in the commission process for the victims’ families.

Many key RCMP witnesses have yet to testify at the hearing, Miller
said, adding that all should be cross-examined.

“The deep concern from my clients and other families as I understand
it, is that we will see this again,” she said.

Emily Hill, senior counsel for the mass casualty commission, told
reporters Friday it’s possible the commission will grant further
accommodations to witnesses that would allow them to avoid being
cross-examined or testifying in person. But she said no further
requests for accommodations have been made so far.

“At this point we haven’t received any other requests … but if we
receive them, then we have to consider them,” she said.

“Family lawyers have been permitted to ask questions of almost every
witness,” she said, and some questions asked in the recorded testimony
came from families’ counsel.

Miller, however, said she was able to submit written questions to
commission counsel, which she said does not equate to adequate
questioning of witnesses. “It’s misleading for them to suggest that
the ability to ask questions has been allowed."

“What we’re advocating for is appropriate cross-examination, which is
materially different than asking questions, putting them in writing
and giving them to commission counsel to ask in place of us doing it
ourselves with the appropriate followup,” Miller said.

Wayne MacKay, a professor emeritus at the Dalhousie University law
school in Halifax, says it seems there was a lack of communication
between the Mass Casualty Commission and the public about why the
decision was made to exempt two senior RCMP officers from being
cross-examined.

"I realize there is … personal health information that has to be
respected. But even with that, the families have walked out with their
lawyers for part of it,” he said in a recent interview.

“Surely, there needed to be a more fully developed and thoughtful
communication about that whole process,” he added.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 3, 2022.

— With files from Michael MacDonald in Halifax.

---

This story was produced with the financial assistance of the Meta and
Canadian Press News Fellowship.

Lyndsay Armstrong, The Canadian Press


https://www.mdwlaw.ca/lawyers/tara-miller/

 Tara Miller, Q.C.
Partner: Personal Injury Lawyer

tara@mdwlaw.ca

Phone: 902.422.5881

Toll Free: 1.844.956.9833

Kelly Dion, Paralegal
kelly@mdwlaw.ca



Tara is the “M” in MDW Law. A proactive and well-respected litigator
with a reputation of being firm but fair, she joined MDW Law as a
partner in May 2015 and is the leader of the firm’s personal injury
and insurance litigation practice group. She received her Queen’s
Counsel designation in 2019.

Originally from beautiful but cold Labrador, she sought the warmth of
Nova Scotia to attend university and begin a civil litigation practice
at a large Atlantic regional law firm.  She then honed her litigation
skills practicing insurance defence litigation exclusively in-house
for a national insurance company. She now uses her almost 25 years of
knowledge and experience to help clients injured in motor vehicle and
other accidents receive fair and timely settlements. She also
regularly provides advice and representation in other insurance
litigation matters.

Tara was drawn to a personal injury practice after a close family
member was in a significant accident.  She understands the emotional
toll on individuals and families dealing with the aftermath of an
unexpected injury or tragedy. While she does not hesitate to take
matters to trial when necessary, she believes alternative dispute
resolution leading to early settlement is in every client’s best
interest as the best results for most are achieved outside of the
adversarial court process. She has a wealth of experience in
negotiation, mediation and alternative dispute resolution. Her
experience also includes representing Personal Representatives of
deceased family members in the Desmond Fatality Inquiry under the
Fatality Investigations Act.

Outside of the office, Tara is an active and engaged volunteer in her
community.  She is a longstanding provincial Board member and Chair of
Special Olympics Nova Scotia.  She is the Past President of the PC
Party of Nova Scotia, after serving for 3 years as Party President.
In the legal community, she is a board member of the Lawyers Insurance
Association of NS and a member (and past executive member) of the
national CBA Women Lawyers Forum.  She is the former Chair of the Fine
Arts Parents Association.

Like her clients, Tara is passionate about her own family.  The mother
of two active teenagers (and a small but mighty dog), she is in charge
of clean laundry, timely transportation and short order meal
preparation!  She also spends a fair amount of time in soccer fields
and hockey rinks watching QMJHL games.  She spends some of her spare
time on a yoga mat, at her life long family cottage on the North
Shore, in running sneakers or working from a cookbook in the kitchen
with a glass of wine in hand.


PC Party Executive

    Share

Table Officers

    President: David Bond
    Executive Vice President:
    Secretary: Morris MacLeod
    Treasurer: Peter Orser
    Past President: Julie Chaisson
    Vice President (Policy): Rob Shea
    Vice President (Organization): Stephen Taylor
    PCNS Fund Chair: Chris Lydon
    Provincial Director: Penny Morash (non-voting)

Ex-Officio Members

    Leader: Tim Houston
    Young PC President: Tristan Shaw
    Women’s Caucus: Nicole Mosher

District Vice-Presidents

District 1
Glace Bay-Dominion, Cape Breton-Whitney Pier, and Sydney-Membertou
Todd McDougall

District 2
Victoria-The Lakes, Northside-Westmount, and Cape Breton East
Rob Andrews

District 3
Inverness, Richmond, and Guysborough-Tracadie
Barry Landry

District 4
Pictou Centre, Pictou West, Pictou East, and Antigonish
Hilton Moore

District 5
Cumberland North, Cumberland South, Colchester North,
Truro-Bible Hill-Millbrook-Salmon River, and Colchester-Musquodoboit Valley
Andy Smith

District 6
Hants East, Waverly-Fall River-Beaver Bank, Sackville-Uniacke,
Sackville-Cobequid, and Hammonds Plains-Lucasville
David Borden

District 7
Bedford Basin, Bedford South, Timberlea-Prospect, Clayton Park West,
and Fairview-Clayton Park
Jim Hanifen

District 8
Halifax Atlantic, Halifax Armdale, Halifax Chebucto, Halifax Needham,
and Halifax Citadel-Sable Island
Mike Salterio

District 9
Dartmouth North, Dartmouth East, Dartmouth South, and Eastern Passage
Rhonda Vickers

District 10
Cole Harbour-Dartmouth, Cole Harbour, Preston, and Eastern Shore
Lisa Bonang

District 11
Chester-St. Margaret's, Lunenburg, Lunenburg West, Queens, and Shelburne
Evelyn Snyder

District 12
Argyle, Yarmouth, Clare, and Digby-Annapolis
Marc Blinn

District 13
Annapolis, Kings West, Kings North, Kings South, and Hants West
Eric Meisner
Members At Large

    George Laird
    Darren McFadgen
    Marlene Smith
    Sue Uhren

Committee Chairs & Other Ex-Officio

    National Council – Nova Scotia: Rob Batherson
    2022 Annual Meeting Co-Chairs: Ryan Sharpe & Sarah McInnes
    Constitution: George White
    4PC Operations: Cheryl Newcombe
    Communications Chair: Mark Boudreau
    Membership: Jackie King
    Diverse Communities: Betty Thomas
    Code of Conduct Committee Co-Chairs: Adam Grant & Sarah McInnes

Management Committee Members

    Julie Chaisson
    Tim Houston
    David Bond
    Peter Orser
    Morris MacLeod
    David MacGregor
    Chris Lydon
    Rob Shea
    Stephen Taylor
    Barry Landry
    Andy Smith

Past Presidents

    Ms. Julie Chaisson, February 2019 – February 2021
    Ms. Tara Miller, February 2016 – February 2019
    Ms. Janet Fryday Dorey, February 2012 – February 2016
    Mr. Robert Batherson, November 2009 – February 2012
    Mr. Scott Armstrong, February 2006- November 2009
    Mr. John MacDonell, February 2004- February 2006
    Mr. Grant Galbraith, February 2002- February 2004
    Ms. Heather Foley Melvin, April 2000 –  February 2002
    Mr. Tom Jarmyn, February 1999 – April 2000
    The late Mr. Stephen Mont, February 1996 – February 1999
    Hon. Alfie MacLeod, October 1994 – February 1996
    Mr. Jim White, February 1994 – October 1994
    The late Mr. Jim Connors, February 1993 – February 1994
    Mr. Blair Mitchell, November 1991 – February 1993
    Mrs. Irene Swindells, February 1988 – November 1991
    The late Mr. John Abbass, January 1985 – February 1988
    The late Miss. Helen Gillis, February 1983 – January 1985
    The late Mr. John Grant
    The late Mrs. Sylivia Isenor
    Mr. Gordon Tidman
    Hon. Angus MacIsaac
    Mr. Walter Goodfellow
    The late Mr. Maurice Flemming
    The late Hon. Finlay MacDonald
    The late Rt. Hon. Robert L. Stanfield



On 12/31/20, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/nobody-safe-from-edmonton-blogger-charged-with-hate-crime-1.4161015
>
> 'Nobody was safe from it': Edmonton blogger charged with rare hate
> crime targeted individuals across Canada
>
> Police say Barry Winters, 62, made derogatory remarks about race,
> gender, politics
> Roberta Bell · CBC News · Posted: Jun 14, 2017 5:38 PM MT
>
> Edmonton police Sgt. Gary Willits of the hate crimes unit said the
> investigation into blog posts targeting numerous individuals took more
> than a year.  (Scott Neufeld/CBC)
>
> Blogs that led to a rare charge of promoting hatred were more extreme
> than anything he's ever seen before, says an Edmonton police
> investigator.
>
> "I've never seen such extreme hatred from an individual," said
> Edmonton police Sgt. Gary Willits. "He just kept spewing and nobody
> was safe from it.
>
> "He literally in some of these blogs was saying to kill people."
>
> After an investigation of more than a year, Edmonton police confirmed
> Wednesday a CBC News report a day earlier that revealed Barry Winters,
> 62, was charged with wilful promotion of hatred on a blog called The
> Baconfat Papers and other blogs between 2014 and 2016. But police say
> there's reason to believe the posts date back at least two years
> earlier.
>
> Copies of the blog submitted for evidence by one of many complainants
> in the case show the blogger repeatedly made derogatory comments about
> numerous individuals across the country, including a number of
> well-known politicians and LGBTQ advocates in Edmonton.
>
> The remarks don't exclusively target one particular group, but focus
> on various factors, including race, gender, sexual orientation and
> culture. Others attack individual politicians in various levels of
> government.
>
> Willits said it's possible some people still don't know they were
> targeted in the blog posts.
>
> Glenn Canning, based in Toronto, said there were dozens of posts on
> Winters' blog between 2014 and 2016 about his daughter, Rehtaeh
> Parsons. She committed suicide after she was sexually abused by a
> group of teenage boys at a party in Halifax in 2013.
>
> Canning said he discovered his daughter and his family were the
> subject of the blog posts after someone contacted him and told him
> about them.
>
> It just broke my bloody heart in half to read that.
>
> - Rehtaeh Parsons 's father Glen Canning
>
> The blogs that focused on Rehtaeh were "just disgusting and sick," Canning
> said.
>
> "It just broke my bloody heart in half to read that. It was cruel and
> it is even crueller to know that the guy did it for no other reason
> than he enjoyed hurting somebody."
>
> Canning said he was in touch with police over the past year after they
> opened the investigation. He's glad police have finally laid a charge.
>
> "I've cried over this," Canning said. "When it happens to you over a
> very personal thing, it affects you pretty badly."
>
> Marni Panas, an Edmonton-based LGBTQ advocate, said she was appalled
> when she stumbled across posts on a blog suggesting she move to a
> country where transgender women, like herself, are persecuted.
>
> You don't know who's on the other end of these keyboards.
>
> - Marni Panas
>
>
> "You don't know who's on the other end of these keyboards.You don't
> know what they're capable of and that instills a real fear," said
> Panas, who notified police in 2016.
>
> Panas said she has experienced online hateful comments before, but
> said it stood out that the blogger in this instance was from the same
> city.
>
> She said she'd never met the the blogger, to her knowledge, but
> wondered what would happen if she did.
>
> Willits said police began the investigation in early 2016, after they
> received complaints about the blog posts. Collecting the evidence was
> time-consuming and complicated, he said, because patterns of hatred,
> threats and harm had to be documented meticulously.
>
> Willits said stating an opinion, a personal dislike, of something or
> someone, is not the same as "intruding on others" and "uttering
> threats."
>
> The charge Winters faces is rare. Alberta Justice said in an email
> that province-wide, that type of charge has only been laid on three
> other occasions since 2011.
>
> Edmonton police had to seek approval from the attorney general to
> charge the blogger, who police say had a growing following numbering
> into the thousands.
>
> The posts were filled with derogatory words and "dehumanized scorn"
> toward people and identifiable groups, Willits said.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
> https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/edmonton/barry-winters-kris-wells-lgbtq-edmonton-hate-charges-1.4201914
>
> Professor hopeful hate-crime charge will deter others, despite death of
> accused
>
> 'Of course, it’s tragic when anyone passes away and very said, I
> think, in this case,' LGBTQ advocate says
> CBC News · Posted: Jul 12, 2017 3:45 PM MT
>
> A rare hate-crimes court case in Edmonton is over but the complainants
> may not have the kind of closure they were hoping for.
>
> The man charged with wilful promotion of hatred for offensive language
> he used on his blog, The Baconfat Papers, died of a stroke July 4, one
> of the complainants confirmed Wednesday.
>
> The Edmonton police hate crimes unit charged Barry Winters this spring
> after receiving complaints about his blog from LGBTQ advocates,
> including Kris Wells, the faculty director of the University of
> Alberta's Institute for Sexual Minority Studies and Services.
>
>
>
> •Edmonton police charge blogger with hate crime against prof
> •​'Nobody was safe from it': Edmonton blogger charged with rare hate crime
> •Rise in reported hate crimes in Alberta no surprise to many
>
> "Of course, it's tragic when anyone passes away and very sad, I think,
> in this case," Wells told CBC News.
>
>
> "I don't think there's any resolution," Wells said. "This person
> hasn't been held accountable; only in the sense of karma, perhaps, if
> you believe in that — the universe taking care of things on its own
> terms."
>
>
> Even though there will be no court hearing or decision, Wells is
> hopeful the nature of the charge will act as a deterrent to others
> using racist, homophobic or sexist language.
>
>
> "When you cross that line from free speech to hate speech, there will
> be consequences. That's probably the most important message out of
> these charges."
>
>
> Wells said he was shocked at the "hateful and horrific nature of the
> comments," when he read Winters's blog over two years ago. Wells was
> one of several people targeted with violent threats.
>
>
> "I'm used to lots of issues being directed my way because of the work
> that I do and in the LGBTQ community, but this really was beyond any
> bounds of acceptability."
>
>
>
>
>
> Wells acknowledged that the threshold is high for police to lay
> hate-crime charges, but he's hoping more people will report to police
> if they suspect someone's behaviour falls under that part of the
> Criminal Code.
>
> Wells said only one in 10 hate crimes is reported in Canada.
>
>
> Statistics Canada data show the rate of hate crimes in Alberta rose 39
> per cent in 2015, compared to a five-per-cent rise nationally.
>
>
> The Alberta Justice and Solicitor General office said the charge
> against Winters will be stayed before Aug. 4, which was to be
> Winters's next court appearance.
>
> CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 18:49:52 -0700
> Subject: Re the many Webpages of Frank Magazine, Vice Magazine,
> Feminists, Philip Rose, Glen Canning, Dean Roger Ray, Patty Baby Doran
> and the Mindless Evil Fat Bastard in Edmoton commonly known as Mr
> Baconfat
> To: "rod.knecht"<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>, sunrayzulu
> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "scott.macrae"<scott.macrae@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1
> <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Rhansen <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>,
> pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, blake <blake@frankmagazine.ca>,
> bourdap <bourdap@halifax.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jesse
> <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, sean <sean@canadalandshow.com>,
> "Stephen.Horsman"<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>, "danny.copp"
> <danny.copp@fredericton.ca>, macklamoureux@gmail.com, Cindy Bruneau
> <Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
> "don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, themayor
> <themayor@calgary.ca>, woodsideb <woodsideb@fredericton.ca>, deanr0032
> <deanr0032@hotmail.com>, "Gary.Rhodes"<Gary.Rhodes@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
> bluelightning 03 <bluelightning_03@hotmail.com>, smcintyre
> <smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, mgorman <mgorman@herald.ca>,
> "selena.ross@cbc.ca"<selena.ross@cbc.ca>, michael@frankmagazine.ca,
> mikegormanhfx@gmail.com, meghan@feministcurrent.com,
> christopherrowe@gmail.com, philiprose123@gmail.com, "Kevin.leahy"
> <Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "Staples, David (Edm
> Journal)"<dstaples@edmontonjournal.com>, lgunter <lgunter@shaw.ca>,
> "joshua.skurnik"<joshua.skurnik@hotmail.com>, "macpherson.don"
> <macpherson.don@dailygleaner.com>, steve.murphy@ctv.ca,
> acampbell@ctv.ca, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, cblatchford
> <cblatchford@postmedia.com>
>
> I hope by now Mack Lamoureux has figured out that I am NOT Mr Baconfat
> and that he has checked the malevolent blog close enough to see what a
> liar Mr Baconfat has proven himself to be.
>
> First lets quote one of his latest blogs
>
> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/vice-canada-amos-canning-and-that-evil-bastards-blog/
>
> "Since that bombastic threat NO media has contacted me until now, and
> Mr. Lamoureux freelancing for an obscure “on-line” sort of alternative
> “news” magazine VICE Canada, two galaxies over in the “cyber-space
> universe” called referring to me as “David” and hounded me with three
> or four e mails for an “interview.” Its  gratifying to know that Mr.
> Canning has finally been successful in his cries for media assistance
> in dealing with me, that evil bastard, and that blog in the “outer
> reaches of the cyber-space universe."
>
> "NO media has contacted me until now"
>
> YEA RIGHT???
>
> Following that "little epsitle" Mr Bconfat posted a YouTube of his
> butt buddy Patty Baby Doran.
>
> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/glen-canning-exposed/
>
> To relieve yourselves of boredon perhaps everybody and the
> "journalists" amongst you in particular should fast forward to 28
> minutes and 30 sec and freeze fames as you read two emails between Mr
> Baconfat and Frank Magazine last year from last year. DUHHH???
>
> Kinda easy to see that your old blogging buddy Mr Baconfat is a
> Monumental Liar with a very poor memory kinda like you N'esy pas
> Chucky Leblanc? Like you Mr Baconfat deletes his blogs once a Faux Pas
> has been exposed which is why I must save his words and yours EH
> Chucky Baby?
>
> However there is much more that the VICE dudes should enjoy. It proves
> that the arseholes within CBC, CTV, Global, the Herald, the Irving
> Empire and Frank Magazine etc have known about Glen Canning and Mr
> Baconfat's questionable actions all along. But this recent news should
> have embarassed the Hell out the RCMP and their boss Mr Harper. Yet
> nobody gave a damn Eh Kevin Leahy
>
> http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/child-porn-policing-program-suffers-from-rcmp-underspending-1.2963885
>
> There is a lot more to be found within the following link. If you read
> you will see I explained this to Frank Magazine et al in great detail
> last year so there is no need to be redundant.
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/06/yo-mr-baconfat-folks-have-to-pay-to.html
>
> Here is just a taste so the that evil bastard Mr Baconfat can eat his
> own words and hopefully choke on them..
>
> http://baconfat53.blogspot.ca/2014/05/glen-cannings-insane-jihad-against-us.html
>
> Wednesday, May 28, 2014
>
> Glen Canning's Insane Jihad Against Us Infidels!
>
> Glen Canning and his ex wife Leah Parsons have been waging a
> relentless Jihad of sort against anyone that does not buy the "family
> Parsons /Canning " propaganda about the life and martyrdom of "Saint
> Rehtaeh of Parsons." Glen and Leah's Jihad against myself and others
> has taken strange turn in the last few weeks. A few short weeks ago
> seemingly one of the parents of the principles of the Rehtaeh Parsons
> tragedy emailed me to complain the "antics of Leah Parsons and Glen
> Canning." Glen Canning sent 7 emails and six obscene hate filled
> epistles to my blog comments. Also Gen Canning made a threatening and
> harassing telephone call to my wife's place of employment. And today
> things got "curiouser and curiouser" when Mike Gorman of Halifax's
> Frank Magazine emailed some questions for me, as he is reporting about
> the Rehtaeh Parsons" media circus of the last year or so. Is Mr.
> Gorman a mere shill for Glen Canning?
>
> One of the questions Mr. Gorman posed to me was, "was I going to
> defend myself and launch a lawsuit. After I answered his query, it
> occurred to me that "those four boys" vilified, slandered, outted by
> anonymous, Team Parsons / Canning, and the Feministas, would have a
> very good case to litigate against all of these parties. These lads
> were never charged with a crime, never convicted, their identities
> protected by law, were abused, exposed, threatened, and their lives
> ruined by a "lynch mob" fomented and directed by Glen Canning and Leah
> Parsons using social media.. It seems to me these people have been
> grievously wronged and injured by the Canning, Parsons duo and are
> entitled to considerable legal remedy. Glen Canning and Leah Parsons
> ought to pay recompense to the collateral damage victims of their
> "Holy War."
>
> Mr. Gorman was entirely ignorant of "Rehtaeh's Law, that deals with
> cyber-bullying, harassment by posting, and distributing humiliating,
> and or naked pictures on social media. The behavior that some say
> drove poor Rehtaeh to suicide is now illegal. The ignorant Mr. Gorman
> wondered what effect would Rehaeh's Father "suing" me under Rehteah's
> Law would have on me. "Rehtaeh's Law is a CC of C section. So Mr.
> Canning has no input in the laying of such charges. I further educated
> Mr Gorman, that no one can "cyber-bully" Rehtaeh Parsons because she
> is dead as a Mackeral. There are no naked or pornographic pictures of
> Rehtaeh, nor of Mr. Glen Canning for that matter, if he is considering
> saying he is a victim of a miscreant violating Rehtaeh's Law. In fact
> I haven't harassed, bullied, sent unsolicited email, or communicated
> with anyone. I write a blog. A blog Glen Canning frequently visits and
> reads very much on his volition.
>
> Glen Canning and his ex wife Leah Parsons have been impersonating
> people on the world wide web, harassing them, and threatening them,
> because there is money to be made being "poor victims. And they would
> NOT want or let anyone jeopardize that. Mr. Canning has NO legal
> options, recourse, or means to shut me or others up.
>
> That's game, set and match, Glen!
>
> Posted by Seren at 1:35 PM
>
> Hence VICE Magazine has every chance in the world to set the record
> straight. EH Jesse Brown and Chucky Leblanc?
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:26:22 -0700
> Subject: Whilst Chucky Leblanc was having a little pow wow with Jesse
> Baby Brown in Fat Fred City his old blogging butt buddy the Very Evil
> Bastard Mr Baconfat of Edmonton was busy typing his latest epistle
> about Vice Magazine, Glen Canning and Mean Old Me
> To: Jeff.Callaway@wildrose.ca, David.Price@wildrose.ca,
> finance@wildrose.ca, "Heather.Forsyth"
> <Heather.Forsyth@assembly.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>,
> "Raj.Sherman"<Raj.Sherman@assembly.ab.ca>, Rachel Notley
> <Rachel.Notley@assembly.ab.ca>, "greg.clark@albertaparty.ca"
> <greg.clark@albertaparty.ca>, "Marianne.Ryan"
> <Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, ed <ed@wildrose.ca>,
> highwood@assembly.ab.ca, joe.anglin@assembly.ab.ca, "Danielle.Smith"
> <Danielle.Smith@assembly.ab.ca>, shennig@taxpayer.com,
> SHutton@stikeman.com, LacLaBiche.StPaul.TwoHills@assembly.ab.ca,
> brian.hodgson@assembly.ab.ca, Shayne.Saskiw@assembly.ab.ca, sunrayzulu
> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, "rod.knecht"<rod.knecht@edmontonpolice.ca>,
> patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, Rhansen
> <Rhansen@calgarypolice.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, macklamoureux
> <macklamoureux@gmail.com>, Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, jesse
> <jesse@jessebrown.ca>, sean <sean@canadalandshow.com>,
> "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "David.Coon"
> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Leanne.Fitch"
> <Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>
>
> Which blog will get more hits?  Survey Says?
>
> http://charlesotherpersonalitie.blogspot.ca/2015/02/jesse-brown-from-canadaland-is.html
>
> https://baconfatreport.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/vice-canada-amos-canning-and-that-evil-bastards-blog/
>
> Better yet does anyone even care?
>
>
>
> That said perhaps Mr Lamoureux should finally sprout some balls and
> answer my emails or at least pick up the phone and give me call. Most
> folks know that I find it very offensive to be thought of as the evil
> Mr Baconfat  EH Cindy Buneau and Rod Knecht?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2020/12/attn-sidney-powell-et-al-i-just-called.html
>
>
> Saturday, 26 December 2020
> ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in Texas and many
> of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:07:58 +0000
> Subject: Automatic Reply
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>
> Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please
> note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured
> that your message will be carefully reviewed.
>
> We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.
>
> -------------------
>
> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>
> En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez
> prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
> votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu
> avec soin.
>
> Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:08:11 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
> your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
> filings
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Thank you very much for reaching out to the Office of the Hon. Bill
> Blair, Member of Parliament for Scarborough Southwest.
>
> Please be advised that as a health and safety precaution, our
> constituency office will not be holding in-person meetings until
> further notice. We will continue to provide service during our regular
> office hours, both over the phone and via email.
>
> Due to the high volume of emails and calls we are receiving, our
> office prioritizes requests on the basis of urgency and in relation to
> our role in serving the constituents of Scarborough Southwest. If you
> are not a constituent of Scarborough Southwest, please reach out to
> your local of Member of Parliament for assistance. To find your local
> MP, visit: https://www.ourcommons.ca/members/en
>
> Moreover, at this time, we ask that you please only call our office if
> your case is extremely urgent. We are experiencing an extremely high
> volume of calls, and will better be able to serve you through email.
>
> Should you have any questions related to COVID-19, please see:
> www.canada.ca/coronavirus<http://www.canada.ca/coronavirus>
>
> Thank you again for your message, and we will get back to you as soon
> as possible.
>
> Best,
>
>
> MP Staff to the Hon. Bill Blair
> Parliament Hill: 613-995-0284
> Constituency Office: 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
> **
> Merci beaucoup d'avoir pris contact avec le bureau de l'Honorable Bill
> Blair, D?put? de Scarborough-Sud-Ouest.
>
> Veuillez noter que par mesure de pr?caution en mati?re de sant? et de
> s?curit?, notre bureau de circonscription ne tiendra pas de r?unions
> en personne jusqu'? nouvel ordre. Nous continuerons ? fournir des
> services pendant nos heures de bureau habituelles, tant par t?l?phone
> que par courrier ?lectronique.
>
> En raison du volume ?lev? de courriels que nous recevons, notre bureau
> classe les demandes par ordre de priorit? en fonction de leur urgence
> et de notre r?le dans le service aux ?lecteurs de Scarborough
> Sud-Ouest. Si vous n'?tes pas un ?lecteur de Scarborough Sud-Ouest,
> veuillez contacter votre d?put? local pour obtenir de l'aide. Pour
> trouver votre d?put? local, visitez le
> site:https://www.noscommunes.ca/members/fr
>
> En outre, nous vous demandons de ne t?l?phoner ? notre bureau que si
> votre cas est extr?mement urgent. Nous recevons un volume d'appels
> extr?mement ?lev? et nous serons mieux ? m?me de vous servir par
> courrier ?lectronique.
>
> Si vous avez des questions concernant COVID-19, veuillez consulter le
> site : http://www.canada.ca/le-coronavirus
>
> Merci encore pour votre message, et nous vous r?pondrons d?s que possible.
>
> Cordialement,
>
> Personnel du D?put? de l'Honorable Bill Blair
> Colline du Parlement : 613-995-0284
> Bureau de Circonscription : 416-261-8613
> bill.blair@parl.gc.ca<mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
> < mailto:bill.blair@parl.gc.ca>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 19:11:47 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called
> your office in Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th
> filings
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>
> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.com
>
> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<mailto:publiceditor@globeandmail.com>
>
> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>
> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
> press releases.
>
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 15:07:53 -0400
> Subject: FWD ATTN Sidney Powell et al I just called your office in
> Texas and many of your associates within the Dec 11th filings
> To: info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com,
> tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com,
> washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach
> <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>,
> "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom
> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>,
> news <news@dailygleaner.com>, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>, Nathalie
> Sturgeon <sturgeon.nathalie@brunswicknews.com>, mcu
> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, tracy@uncoverdc.com
> Cc: James@jamesfetzer.com, David Amos
> <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>, editor@americanthinker.com,
> jeromecorsi6554 <jeromecorsi6554@gmail.com>, susan@susanbradford.org
>
>
>  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNv-DoZ-6Dk&feature=emb_title
>
> Patrick Byrne dropping MOABS exclusively on SteelTruth
> •Streamed live on Dec 22, 2020
> Ann Vandersteel
> SteelTruth Weeknights 9pm ET
>
>
> SteelTruth™
>
> (561) 320-2464
> P.O. Box 3074
> Tequesta, FL 33469
> tips@steeltruth.com
> media@steeltruth.com
>
>
> Press Inquires: press@deepcapture.com or phone (480) 692-9336
>
> At the time much of the content on DeepCapture.com was written, the
> Great Financial Crisis of 2008 was either on the verge of happening or
> had just occurred. In those days, emotions among this publication’s
> contributors were raw and, in an effort to get their warnings noticed
> and appropriate blame placed, occasionally hyperbolic language and
> shocking imagery were employed. Were we to write these entries today,
> a different tone would prevail.
>
> Yet, being a record of a pivotal time in our global economic history,
> we’ve decided to leave the rawness unedited, with the proviso that
> readers take the context of the creation of certain posts into
> account, and that those easily offended re-consider the decision to
> read them.
>
> https://radioinfluence.com/2020/12/21/dark-to-light-a-meeting-with-the-president/
>
>
> Dark To Light: A Meeting With The President
> Radio Influence Staff
> December 21, 2020
> 3
>
> Patrick Byrne joins us today for a passionate conversation about his
> meeting with the President of the United States. There isn’t a need
> for many show notes.
>
> If there was ever an episode of the show you need to share with your
> friends and family, this is it.
>
> Follow Tracy Beanz on Twitter, subscribe to her YouTube channel, and
> check out her newest venture, UncoverDC.com!
>
> Follow Frank on Twitter, subscribe to his YouTube channel, and follow
> his solo podcast, Quite Frankly!
> Subscribe to Dark To Light With Frank & Beanz on Apple Podcasts,
> Stitcher, TuneIn Radio, Google Play, the iHeartRadio app, and now on
> Spotify!
>
>
> YO Jimmy Fetzer we talked again today after 16 very long years Correct?
>
> https://jamesfetzer.com/
>
> James H. Fetzer
> Legal Defense Fund
> 800 Violet Lane
> Oregon, WI   53575
> (608) 835-2707
> James@JamesFetzer.com
>
>
> Now say Hey to the Yankee lawyer in Hells Kitchen Mikey Leron who
> calls himself  "Lionel" in Youtue and other so called free thinkers
> then go figure why I am so pissed off
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_M4lTc5sLw&t=7s&ab_channel=GiuseppeVafanculoNeedtoKnow%3ATheFetzerReport
>
>
> Need to Know: The Fetzer Report World Premiere
> •Streamed live on Sep 3, 2020
> Giuseppe Vafanculo Need to Know: The Fetzer Report
> The first episode Special Report Features Professor Jim Fetzer along
> with commentators Giuseppe Vafanculo from Revolution Radio and Susan
> Bradford Author & Muckraking Journalist
>
>
> http://susanbradford.org/about.php
>
> Susan was lead investigative journalist in the Abramoff investigation,
> exposing the machinations of the Deep State within Indian Country and
> Bob Mueller's partisan prosecution of Republican superlobbyist Jack
> Abramoff and the executives of Enron. She has broken a number of
> stories that have been picked up by ABC News and other national media.
>
> https://www.bitchute.com/video/uudM2hYNgSgv/
>
>
> Jim Fetzer
>
> 2211 subscribers
>
> Need to Know Episode 93 (23 December 2020) with Giuseppe Vafanculo and
> David Scorpio. Whistleblower shares witnessing traitorous betrayal of
> Trump at Friday night White House Meeting. Trump appoints Sidney
> Powell Special Counsel, traitors in White House block her entry. Jenna
> Ellis calls out traitor Barr. Pence lets down Trump again. More and
> more election fraud revealed. Some GOP Congressmen will challenge
> electoral fraud on House floor. Trump threatens to veto stimulus bill
> unless direct payments upped to $2,000. Drunken Pelosi parties
> maskless with no social distancing--traitorous HYPOCRITE! 5 key
> elements to scamdemic. Who finally admits most PCR tests reveal
> nothing but the common cold. 3,150 MRNA ejection recipients sickened
> enough to require hospitalization. 50% of US States plan to deny White
> People the MRNA quackccination. Russian scientist who worked on COVID
> quackccine stabbed, falls out of window (another suicide). Netanyahu
> government collapses, 4th Israeli election in 2 years
>
>
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=beTDI9WggNY&t=1346s&ab_channel=LionelNation
>
> America the Unrecognizable
> 9,600 views
> Streamed live on Dec 23, 2020
> Lionel Nation
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Lionel Media <info@lionelmedia.com>
> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 20:16:31 +0000
> Subject: The New Lionel Nation Channel
> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>
> Remember what it was like to think dangerously? When expression and
> thought weren't throttled. When we questioned everything.
>
>
> ** “Censorship reflects society’s lack of confidence in itself. It is
> a hallmark of an authoritarian regime.” – Potter Stewart
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> View this email in your browser
> (https://us14.campaign-archive.com/?e=4dcb13a46e&u=aaca0d56ddaf02ef4aa46f516&id=04990bcd04)
>
> Here’s the news. I’ve a new channel. A new platform. A new paid
> subscription membership
> (https://lionelmedia.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) . It’s
> not on any social media platform. It’s LionelMedia
> (https://lionelmedia.com/) . New and improved. Remember when thinking
> was dangerous and unregulated? You know. Freedom of speech. Freedom of
> thought, expression, belief. Unfettered, unencumbered, unplugged.
> Remember? Sounds too good to be true. But it’s happening. Here
> (https://lionelmedia.com/membership-account/membership-levels/) .
> Countering the deep state, police state, intel state, shadow
> government and ruling class #BigTech fascists. Ahem.
>
> My story. Tuesday morning, 11 September 2001 CE. Redpilled. Big time.
> Everything changed for me and I haven’t been the same since. I was in
> NYC and couldn’t believe what I was seeing. And then I couldn’t
> believe what I was reading and seeing on TV. But the truth was online.
> This was before social media and Twatter, Fecesbook and that other
> thing. It was Wild West Internet. The theories and hypotheses were
> exploding. Many daft, many deranged and many spot-on and deadly
> accurate. Perfect. We were called Truthers. Translation: People who
> didn’t believe the official account (for a variety of reasons).
> Imagine that, derided for wanting the truth. And it was fun and cool
> and dangerous. And great.
>
> But wait, there’s more. If you want to question vaccine safety
> especially as to kids and you’re not RFK Jr. with Kennedy immunity,
> you’re an Anti-Vaxxer and you’re off social media. Remember in 2016
> when tough guy wannabe and overrated actor Bobby De Niro dared to
> screen “Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe”? Seems that tough guy
> Bobby got whacked and backed down. As the NYT reported
> (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/27/movies/robert-de-niro-pulls-anti-vaccine-documentary-from-tribeca-film-festival.html)
> : “Facing a storm of criticism over its plan to show a documentary
> about the widely debunked link between vaccines and autism, the
> Tribeca Film Festival on Saturday pulled the film from its schedule
> next month.” Did you catch that? Widely debunked link between vaccines
> and autism. You’d better say it’s debunked or you’ll go the way of
> Jenny McCarthy. Who? (Precisely.)
>
> I said there was more. Doubt that UBL was dispatched in a gun battle
> in Abbottabad and tossed into the drink à la Luca Brasi with not one
> single morgue shot available and question the seemingly endless
> passels of ex-Navy SEALs who swear they single-handedly plugged Osama
> bin Forgotten, you’re a Deather. Ditto for questioning Saddam’s phone
> cam dispatch. Unsure as to Barry O’s provenance (and you can think
> Hillary C for that one), you’re a Birther (and a racist). Think that
> masks don’t work (as Fauci said repeatedly) other than to steam up
> glasses and perpetuate the culture of anonymity, you’re a Masker. (OK,
> I made that one up). Bottom line, if you don’t regurgitate the pap,
> the story line, you’re on your own. And for most folks they couldn’t
> care less. Just let them pose half nude in front of a bathroom mirror
> or perseverate the illusion and fantasy of hotness via beauty app and
> they’re fine. That’s the way it works. Addict folks to social media
> and then demand that they abide by the
> rules of insipidity or lose their exhibitionist license. Sorry,
> Sparky, not for me.
>
> Then, it all changed. After social media hooked everyone with an
> unlimited narcissism stage it changed the rules. Don’t talk at all of
> the aforementioned or anything about hydroxychloroquine, stolen
> elections, Biden’s profligate son, China, geoengineering, the
> conspiracy theory du jour, pro-Trump ideations, “hate speech” and any
> of the forbidden phobias or Poof! Off you go. Be gone. Demonetization,
> shadow-banning, prohibition in toto, suspension, exceptions, labeling,
> cautionary warnings. Systematic destruction of random and erstwhile
> protected thought. You will be relegated and exiled in social media
> Elba.
>
> I need my own platform. I'm being second-guessed, sanctioned,
> penalized, throttled, demonetized. And for what exactly? Especially
> now with a spate of ex-Mafia made channels regaling you with lurid
> tales of hits and murder and "the life." (Whither omertà?) That’s OK.
> But dare to discuss COVID therapeutics and you’re Elvis. Sorry. Look,
> there’s nothing wrong with making money from the dissemination of
> opinion and analysis. We’re capitalists, after all. (That’s still
> legal. Right, AOC?) I want to say what I want and share it with the
> world for comments and reactions and reasonable pecuniary support.
> It’s what I’ve been doing professionally for 33 years inter alia.
> Heritage MSM news platforms are dead. Shock jocks are dinosaurs.
> Nothing shocks anymore. Other than the level of censorship. The only
> thing available of any informational truth value is citizen/civilian,
> alternative and foreign media. And this.
>
> Our mailing address is:
>
> Lionel Media
> The Lebron Firm
> 745 5th Avenue, 5th Floor
> New York, New York 10151
>
>
> https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/12/overstocks_colorful_founder_has_tales_to_tell_about_the_russia_hoax.html
>
> December 23, 2020
> Overstock's colorful founder has tales to tell about the Russia hoax
> By Andrea Widburg
>
> Patrick Byrne, Overstock's founder, has long suspected that Obama set
> up a police intelligence state that's been calling the shots in
> American politics since 2015.  On Sunday, he pushed back against those
> of Trump's legal advisers demanding surrender.  On Tuesday, he claimed
> that Obama had blackmailed Hillary Clinton to own her politically.  If
> that's true, what Byrne is saying can upend the American political
> scene.
>
> The New Yorker profiled Byrne early in December.  Sheelah Kolhatkar,
> who wrote the profile, thinks Byrne is probably as crazy as John
> McAfee, with both given over to life-destroying conspiracy theories.
> Kolhatkar plays fair, though, and cannot deny his brilliance.
>
>     Former employees describe a memory trick he likes to perform, in
> which he studies a deck of cards for a few minutes and then recites
> back the order of the cards, one by one. "When he's on, he's smart,
> charming, complex, and brilliant," Marc Cohodes, who was once a critic
> of Overstock and is now an investor in the company, told me.
>
> While Byrne may be eccentric, he's often right.  He was the first to
> realize that investment firms and stock traders were colluding to
> drive stock prices down.  He was accused of being paranoid, but the
> financial crisis proved he was correct.  Additionally, while Byrne's
> tales about his adventures sound like fiction, that doesn't mean they
> are:
>
>     David Luban, a professor of law at Georgetown University who has
> known Byrne since teaching him as an undergraduate, observed that
> improbable things seem to happen to Byrne with remarkable frequency.
> "He's a hard man to bet against," Luban said. "So many of his stories
> that have seemed utterly incredible turn out to be true."
>
> Byrne's biggest adventure was his relationship with Maria Butina, who
> was later convicted of acting as an unregistered Russian foreign
> agent.  When she approached him, he was worried enough to report that
> fact to the FBI and was surprised when the Fibbies were unconcerned.
> Throughout their one-and-a-half-year affair, Byrne kept the FBI
> apprised.
>
> Eventually, Byrne decided that the FBI were the baddies, and were
> setting up Butina, who was arrested in July 2018:
>
>     By then, Byrne's suspicions about the F.B.I. had crystallized into
> a belief that he had been part of a plot by high-ranking members of
> the Obama Administration to commit political espionage, in an attempt
> to control the next President.
>
> Byrne also claims that the Obama administration planned the Russia
> hoax as early as 2015:
>
>     According to the government's version of events, the F.B.I. opened
> Crossfire Hurricane, its investigation into possible ties between the
> Trump campaign and the Russian government, on July 31, 2016, after it
> found out that the Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos had told
> an Australian diplomat that he'd heard that Russians had compromising
> information about Hillary Clinton. Byrne claims that it all really
> started a year earlier, when the F.B.I. became aware of his
> relationship with Butina.
>
> We know that the government's account — that they opened the
> investigation on July 31, 2016 — is a lie.  A July 28, 2016 Peter
> Strzok text to Lisa Page refers to already open counter-intelligence
> investigations.  Moreover, Clinton and the DNC had hired Fusion GPS in
> April 2016 to investigate Trump's alleged Russian ties.  Byrne thinks
> Strzok was an architect of the Russia hoax and used Byrne's
> relationship with Butina to further it.
>
> Strzok denies all knowledge of Bryne and Butina.  As a reminder, this is
> Strzok:
>
> Peter Strzok's creepy smirks freak out Twitter audience
>
> On Sunday, Bryne spoke about a meeting in the Oval Office and claimed
> that Trump's legal advisers are betraying him by urging him not to
> fight massive election fraud:
>
> Now Byrne has gone on record to say that he was part of a 2015 sting
> operation that saw Hillary accept multi-million-dollar bribes from
> foreign governments.  Byrne thought the sting was to reveal Hillary's
> criminality, only to discover that it was to give Obama a hold over
> her when (as everyone assumed) she entered the White House.  You can
> see the video clip here in which Byrne explains that Obama had used
> the Deep State to set up a blackmail operation.
>
> The big question is whether Byrne is a fabulist, whose utterances we
> should ignore — or is he, instead, a brilliant, successful, connected,
> often prescient man who's currently a voice in the wilderness and
> should be taken very seriously?  I don't have an answer for that, but
> his statements seem consistent with what we know about Hillary's
> corruption and the Obama Deep State, including the FBI.
>
> Image: Patrick Byrne Interview with Ann Vandersteel.  YouTube screen grab.
>
> Staff
> Editor and Publisher    —       Thomas Lifson
> Deputy Editor   —       J.R. Dunn
> Deputy Editor   —       Drew Belsky
> Deputy Editor, Graphics consultant
> (i.e., drop Manager, Social Media)      —       Monica Showalter
> Deputy Editor   —       Andrea Widburg
> Co-founders     —       Richard Baehr, Ed Lasky
>
>
>
> Those were your latest videos now enjoy one mine from 2007 published a
> full year before the RCMP falsely arrested me after the FBI had
> arrested the Yankee Goveno Spitzer in Washington
> Obviously (I reloaded It in this YouTube Channel after Google bought
> YouTube and maliciously deleted my old faithful account)
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WVGHg0jlVWk&ab_channel=MaritimeMalaise
>
> RCMP Sussex New Brunswick
> 1,586 views
> Oct 9, 2010
> MaritimeMalaise
>
>
> Below is a true copy of my latest email It was sent today to Sidney
> Powell byway of her webpage format The lawyers found below will get
> regular email just like I have done with you people (I already called
> them all and spoke to some and left messages with the rest)
>
>
> Perhaps all you lawyers should check my work from years ago and call
> me back  ASAP???
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/265620671/Cross-Border-Txt
>
>
> On 12/13/20, Pam Stavropoulos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au> wrote:
>> Thank you David!
>>
>> Really appreciate wide dissemination of these concerns as you clearly
>> recognise.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Pam S.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Raymond Amos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au>
>> Sent: Monday, 14 December 2020 2:16 PM
>> To: pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au
>> Subject: Contact Form submission from
>> http://pamstavropoulos.com.au/contact/
>>
>> Sender's name: David Raymond Amos
>> E-mail: David.Raymond.Amos333@gmail.com
>> Phone: 506 434 8433
>>
>> Message: ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 23:14:01 -0400
>> Subject: ATTN Yanis Varoufakis and Pam Stavropoulos I just tweeted about
>> your concerns about Julian Assange and global economy etc
>> To: y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
>> Cc: motomaniac333
>>
>> Yanis Varoufakis
>> Web Site:
>>     https://www.yanisvaroufakis.eu
>> Email:
>>     y.varoufakis@parliament.gr
>> Address:
>>     Parliament Mansion (Megaro Voulis), GR10021
>> Athens / Tel. +30 2103707568 / Fax +30 2103707570.
>>
>> Check out the attachment for USA litigation over 18 years ago
>>
>>
>> Please notice that the webcasts and transcripts of this hearing went
>> missing not long  before the economy crashed in 2008 Find the letter
>> fom Spitzer to me on page 12 within the document I offer as
>> "Integrity-Yea-Right" and ask yourself why Assaage has never metioned
>> me In fact I bet that you folks won't either
>>
>> https://www.banking.senate.gov/hearings/review-of-current-investigations-and-regulatory-actions-regarding-the-mutual-fund-industry
>>
>>  Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
>> Mutual Fund Industry
>>
>> Date:   Thursday, November 20, 2003
>>
>> Witness Panel 1
>>
>>     Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
>>     Director - Division of Enforcement
>>     Securities and Exchange Commission
>>           Cutler - November 20, 2003
>>     Mr. Robert Glauber
>>     Chairman and CEO
>>     National Association of Securities Dealers
>>           Glauber - November 20, 2003
>>     Eliot Spitzer
>>     Attorney General
>>     State of New York
>>           Spitzer - November 20, 2003
>>
>>
>>
>> Yanis Varoufakis
>> @yanisvaroufakis
>> ·
>>
>> Law and Disorder: The case of Julian Assange - DiEM25
>> The conviction of Julian Assange would signify a new dystopian
>> landscape in which all investigative journalism risks prosecution.
>> diem25.org
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> @DavidRaymondAm1
>> ·
>> 1h
>> Perhaps you and I should have a long talk ASAP?
>>
>> FYI this old pdf file is the tip of the iceberg of things that Bolton
>> and Assange have known about yours truly for many years
>>
>> https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>
>> David Raymond Amos
>> @DavidRaymondAm1
>> ·
>> 41m
>> The first link I offer in the blog Greece is among the many that
>> received hundreds of documents byway of registered US Mail as I
>> returned home to run for public office 6 more times while suing the
>> Queen
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>>
>> Notice Assange and Trumps lawyer's email before they became famous?
>>
>>
>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2014/05/yo-birgitta-who-is-more-of-crook-julian.html
>>
>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000
>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the
>> first email I ever sent you
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> dear Dave
>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i
>> find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime
>>
>> thank you for bearing with me
>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters
>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and
>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:)
>> plus all the matters in relation to immi
>>
>> with oceans of joy
>> birgitta
>>
>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are
>> not.
>>
>> Andre Gide
>>
>> Birgitta Jonsdottir
>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884
>> http://this.is/birgitta– http://joyb.blogspot.com -
>> http://www.facebook.com/birgitta.jonsdottir
>>
>>>>> From: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM
>>>>> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbGiPjIE1pE
>>>>>
>>>>> More info http://immi.is/
>>>>>
>>>>> Julian Assange Editor WikiLeaks http://wikileaks.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>> To: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org
>>>>> Cc: "Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.net; "Byrne. G"Byrne.G@parl.gc.ca
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is
>>>>> something
>>>>> about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy
>>>>>
>>>>> Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>>
>>>>> Then read on and chuckle
>>>>>
>>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is
>>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009
>>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious
>>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years?
>>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to
>>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our
>>>>> office.
>>>>>
>>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web
>>>>> site www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical
>>>>> information regarding the economic crisis in Iceland.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024
>>>>>
>>>>> From: postur@for.stjr.is
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>>> Subject: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland
>>>>> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and
>>>>> waits attendance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008
>>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the
>>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy?
>>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is,
>>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca,
>>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com,
>>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca
>>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca,
>>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this
>>>>> letter ASAP EH?
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/4304560/Speaker-Iceland-etc
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/5352095/Tony-Merchant-and-Yankees
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me back
>>>>>
>>>>> Veritas Vincit
>>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> The Reykjavík Grapevine
>>>>> Hafnarstræti 15
>>>>> 101 Reykjavík
>>>>> Iceland
>>>>> grapevine@grapevine.is
>>>>> +354-540-3600
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2017/08/attn-andrey-dvornikov-tel-7-499-244-32.html
>>
>> Wednesday, 2 August 2017
>>
>> Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting
>> with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the United Nations,
>> This was the pdf file attached to the email found below
>>
>> https://www.scribd.com/document/332928056/UN-DUDES
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "MAY, Theresa"theresa.may.mp@parliament.uk
>> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:24 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32
>> 54 RE Nikki Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador
>> to the United Nations,
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> If your email is to the Prime Minister, please re-send to the No 10
>> website:
>> www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>>
>> http://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
>>
>>
>> If you are a constituent of the Prime Minister, please re-send to:
>> sharkeyj@parliament.uk
>>
>> UK Parliament Disclaimer: This e-mail is confidential to the intended
>> recipient. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
>> and delete it from your system. Any unauthorised use, disclosure, or
>> copying is not permitted. This e-mail has been checked for viruses,
>> but no liability is accepted for any damage caused by any virus
>> transmitted by this e-mail. This e-mail address is not secure, is not
>> encrypted and should not be used for sensitive data.
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
>> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca
>> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 12:12:16 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Attn Andrey Dvornikov, tel. (+7) 499 244 32 54 RE Nikki
>> Haley meeting with Vasily Nebeznya.Russia's new ambassador to the
>> United Nations,
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>> comments.
>>
>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>> commentaires.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos
>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
>> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
>> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
>> does he lie to me after all this time???
>> To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
>> Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
>> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
>> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
>> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
>> "CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management" , news-tips , lionel
>> Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
>> elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
>> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
>> oldmaison , andre
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Michael Cohen
>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just
>> called and left a message for you
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal
>> counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be
>> directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be
>> directed to 646-853-0114.
>> ________________________________
>> This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate
>> thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity.
>> This email may contain information that is confidential and/or
>> proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used,
>> copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended
>> recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and
>> promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed
>> to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted,
>> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses
>> or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not
>> guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for
>> any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in
>> any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its
>> affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an
>> electronic signature under applicable law.
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
>>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 22:05:00 +0000
>> Subject: RE: Yo President Trump RE the Federal Court of Canada File No
>> T-1557-15 lets see how the media people do with news that is NOT FAKE
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>> comments.
>>
>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>> commentaires.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Kevin Leahy
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 12:38:43 -0400
>> Subject: Re: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge (857 259
>> 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> French will follow
>>
>> Thank you for your email.
>>
>> For inquiries regarding EMRO’s Office, please address your email to
>> acting EMRO Sebastien Brillon at sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> For inquiries regarding CO NHQ Office, please address your email to
>> acting CO Farquharson, David at David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> All PPS related correspondence should be sent to my PPS account at
>> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Merci pour votre courriel.
>>
>> Pour toute question concernant le Bureau de l'EMRO, veuillez adresser
>> vos courriels à l’Officier responsable des Relations
>> employeur-employés par intérim Sébastien Brillon  à l'adresse suivante
>>  sebastien.brillon@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> Pour toute  question concernant le bureau du Commandant de la
>> Direction générale, veuillez adresser vos courriels au   Commandant de
>> la Direction générale par intérim Farquharson, David  à l'adresse
>> suivante   David.Farquharson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> Toute correspondance relative au Service De Protection Parlementaire
>> doit être envoyée à mon compte de PPS à l'adresse suivante
>> kevin.leahy@pps-spp@parl.gc.ca
>>
>>
>> Kevin Leahy
>> Chief Superintendent/Surintendant principal
>> Director, Parliamentary Protective Service
>> Directeur , Service de protection parlementaire
>> T 613-996-5048
>> Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email and any attachments are
>> confidential and may contain protected information. It is intended
>> only for the individual or entity named in the message. If you are not
>> the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver the
>> message that this email contains to the intended recipient, you should
>> not disseminate, distribute or copy this email, nor disclose or use in
>> any manner the information that it contains. Please notify the sender
>> immediately if you have received this email by mistake and delete it.
>> AVIS DE CONFIDENTIALITÉ: Le présent courriel et tout fichier qui y est
>> joint sont confidentiels et peuvent contenir des renseignements
>> protégés. Il est strictement réservé à l’usage du destinataire prévu.
>> Si vous n’êtes pas le destinataire prévu, ou le mandataire chargé de
>> lui transmettre le message que ce courriel contient, vous ne devez ni
>> le diffuser, le distribuer ou le copier, ni divulguer ou utiliser à
>> quelque fin que ce soit les renseignements qu’il contient. Veuillez
>> aviser immédiatement l’expéditeur si vous avez reçu ce courriel par
>> erreur et supprimez-le.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario
>> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 16:38:41 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: RE The call from the Boston cop Robert Ridge
>> (857 259 9083) on behalf of the VERY corrupt Yankee DA Rachael Rollins
>> To: David Amos
>>
>> Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly
>> valued.
>>
>> You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
>> reviewed and taken into consideration.
>>
>> There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
>> need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
>> correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
>> response may take several business days.
>>
>> Thanks again for your email.
>> ______­­
>>
>> Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
>> nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
>>
>> Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
>> considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
>>
>> Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
>> responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
>> la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
>> ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
>>
>> Merci encore pour votre courriel.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos
>>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>>> andre@jafaust.com>
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,  mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)"
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:33 +0000
> Subject: RE: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
> I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: David Amos
>
> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
> comments.
>
> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
> commentaires.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: Póstur FOR
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000
> Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump
> I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: David Amos
>
> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið  / Your request has been received
>
> Kveðja / Best regards
> Forsætisráðuneytið  / Prime Minister's Office
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "B English (MIN)"
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:29 +0000
> Subject: Automated response from the office of Hon Bill English
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your email to the Prime Minister.
>
> This is an automated response.
>
> Please be assured that any matters you raise in your email will be
> noted; however, not all messages will receive an individual response.
>
> Yours sincerely
> The Office of the Prime Minister
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: PmInvites
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:50 +0000
> Subject: PM Invites
> To: David Amos
>
> Thank you for your invitation/meeting request to the Prime Minister,
> the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP.
> Your invitation will be considered in light of the Prime Minister's
> existing commitments.
> We will be in touch with you as soon as possible to formally advise
> the progress of your invitation/meeting request.
>
> Yours sincerely
>
> Prime Minister's Office
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> IMPORTANT: This message, and any attachments to it, contains information
> that is confidential and may also be the subject of legal professional or
> other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you
> must not review, copy, disseminate or disclose its contents to any other
> party or take action in reliance of any material contained within it. If
> you
> have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately
> by
> return email informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of the
> message from your computer system.
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Turnbull, Malcolm (MP)"
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:35 +0000
> Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President
> Donald J. Trump I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen
> (646-853-0114) Why does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: David Amos
>
> ***Please be advised that this email address is no longer in use***
>
> Thank you for taking the time to write to me. Feedback from the people
> we represent is always extremely valuable for members of parliament,
> and especially valuable to me as Prime Minister.
>
> However as you can imagine I receive a very large, sometimes
> dauntingly large, amount of correspondence and it is important that we
> do everything we can to respond to it as quickly and effectively as
> possible.
>
> So to help us best direct your enquiry and respond to it, please
> complete this contact form. If you have written a detailed message in
> your email, just cut and paste it into the contact form and complete
> the details requested.
>
> If you would like to invite me or Lucy to an event, please forward the
> invitation to pminvites@pmc.gov.au.
>
> If you are a Wentworth constituent, please make us aware of this and
> my electorate office team in Edgecliff will be in touch.
>
> Regards,
>
> Malcolm Turnbull
> Prime Minister
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: David Amos
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400
> Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I
> just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why
> does he lie to me after all this time???
> To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm ,
> Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc.ca, MulcaT , Jean-Yves.Duclos@parl.gc.ca,
> B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au,
> pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" ,
> fin.financepublic-financepublique.fin@canada.ca, newsroom ,
> "CNN.Viewer.Communications.Management" , news-tips , lionel
> Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com,
> elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur ,
> stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" ,
> oldmaison , andre
>
>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400
>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call the
>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael Rollins
>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme Minister
>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr?
>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com,
>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com, JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca,
>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, sandra.lofaro@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, sfine@globeandmail.com,
>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com,
>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com,
>> andre@jafaust.com>
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com, DJT@trumporg.com
>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca,  mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca
>>
>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos,
>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>>> of Nova Scotia.  Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS.  Please note that we will
>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>>
>>>> Department of Justice
>>>>
>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>>>
>>>>> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-braz
>>>>> ilian.html
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>>>> cards?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly200
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>>>> United States Senate
>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>>>> tapes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this
>>>>>> previously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Good Day Sir
>>>>>
>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>>>
>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>>>>>
>>>>> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>>>>>
>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>>>>>
>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>>>>>
>>>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>>>
>>>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>>>
>>>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>>>
>>>>> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: 20151223
>>>>>
>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>>>
>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>>>
>>>>> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>>>
>>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>>>
>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>>>
>>>>> Plaintiff
>>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>>
>>>>> Defendant
>>>>>
>>>>> ORDER
>>>>>
>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>>>
>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>>>> in its entirety.
>>>>>
>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
>>>>> he stated:
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>>>> Police.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
>>>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>>>
>>>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>>>> Judge
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>>>
>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>>>> most
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>>>> dudes are way past too late
>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>
>>>>> Merci ,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>>>
>>>>> January 13, 2015
>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>>>
>>>>> December 8, 2014
>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>>>
>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>>>
>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>>>
>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>>>
>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>>>
>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>>>
>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>>>
>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>>>
>>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject:
>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>>
>>>>> January 30, 2007
>>>>>
>>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>>>
>>>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>>>
>>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>>>> Minister of Health
>>>>>
>>>>> CM/cb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
>>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>>>
>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>>>
>>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>>>
>>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>>>
>>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Sincerely,
>>>>>
>>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>>>> The Supreme Court
>>>>
>>>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>>
>>>> Amos v. Canada
>>>> Court (s) Database
>>>>
>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>>> Date
>>>>
>>>> 2017-10-30
>>>> Neutral citation
>>>>
>>>> 2017 FCA 213
>>>> File numbers
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>>>
>>>> THE COURT
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Date: 20171030
>>>>
>>>> Docket: A-48-16
>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>>>> CORAM:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BETWEEN:
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formally Appellant)
>>>> and
>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>>>> (and formerly Respondent)
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>>>
>>>> I.                    Introduction
>>>>
>>>> [1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>>>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>>>
>>>> [2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>>>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> II.                 Preliminary Matter
>>>>
>>>> [5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>>>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>>>
>>>> [6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>>>> c. F-7:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal.
>>>> […]
>>>>
>>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>>>> […]
>>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>>>
>>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>>>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
>>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>>>> section.
>>>> [8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>>>> that:
>>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>>>> matière civile et pénale.
>>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>>>
>>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>>>> appeal book.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>>>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>>>> such judge had a conflict.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>>>> was a member of such firm.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>>>> [16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias:
>>>> 60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>>>
>>>> [17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>>>> (4th) 193).
>>>>
>>>> [18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>>>> 27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>>>>             To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>>>> 31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>>>> events from over a decade ago.
>>>> (emphasis added)
>>>>
>>>> [19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>>>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>>>
>>>> [20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>>>
>>>> [21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>>>
>>>> [22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>>>
>>>> [23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>>>> to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>>>
>>>> [25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> III.               Issue
>>>>
>>>> [26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>>>
>>>> IV.              Analysis
>>>>
>>>> A.                 Standard of Review
>>>>
>>>> [27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>>>
>>>> [28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>>>> interfere.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>>>
>>>> [29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>>>
>>>> 17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>>>> (…)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>>>> [footnotes omitted].
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>>>> para. 27).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>>>
>>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>>>
>>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>>>
>>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>>>
>>>> [32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>>>
>>>> [33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>>>
>>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>>>> of process…
>>>>
>>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>>>
>>>> [34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>>>
>>>> [35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>>>> supporting a cause of action.
>>>>
>>>> [36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>>>
>>>> V.                 Conclusion
>>>> [37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>>>> without leave to amend.
>>>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "David G. Near"
>>>> J.A.
>>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>>>> J.A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>>>
>>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>>>> DOCKET:
>>>>
>>>> A-48-16
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>>>
>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> Fredericton,
>>>> New Brunswick
>>>>
>>>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>>>
>>>> May 24, 2017
>>>>
>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>>>
>>>> WEBB J.A.
>>>> NEAR J.A.
>>>> GLEASON J.A.
>>>>
>>>> DATED:
>>>>
>>>> October 30, 2017
>>>>
>>>> APPEARANCES:
>>>> David Raymond Amos
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>>>> (on his own behalf)
>>>>
>>>> Jan Jensen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>>>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>>>
>>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>