

Patricia Conlin, PPC Candidate Durham
Intro


Intro





Auto tycoon Frank Stronach returns to Toronto court on historic sex assault charges
Frank Stronach’s preliminary hearing starts Friday at 10 Armoury Street. There will be a publication ban on the evidence. He will be there with his lawyer Leora Shemesh.

Stronach civil case highlights Succession-like battle over family's billions
Latest chapter in legal drama comes as auto parts tycoon faces sexual assault charges
An Ontario judge's looming decision on whether to compel the Stronach Group to disclose evidence of any coverup of sexual misconduct may add yet a new dimension to a deepening scandal surrounding the multinational's billionaire founder.
The civil court case also offers a peek into the deep divisions at the heart of a family feud involving auto parts tycoon Frank Stronach's adult children and grandchildren.
According to at least one longtime observer, the conflict bears a resemblance to the infighting involving another famous clan.
"There are a lot of parallels to the fictional family in Succession," said Dimitry Anastakis, a University of Toronto professor and business historian.
The popular HBO drama series portrayed members of the mega-rich Roy family — usually in lavish surroundings — as they battled for control of a media conglomerate led by an aging patriarch.
Cast
members of the HBO series Succession pose together at the 75th
Primetime Emmy Awards in Los Angeles in January. According to at least
one longtime observer, the conflict in the Stronach family bears a
resemblance to the infighting involving the TV show's Roy clan. (Aude Guerrucci/Reuters)
Like Logan Roy's fictional rags-to-riches tale, the Austrian-born Stronach built a successful business empire after immigrating to Canada. But recent criminal accusations threaten to consume the 91-year-old's legacy.
In June, Peel Regional Police, near Toronto, laid 13 charges against Stronach, including sexual assault, rape and forcible confinement. The charges stem from alleged incidents involving 10 accusers, from 1977 to this past February.
In an interview with CBC's The Fifth Estate earlier this week, Stronach denied wrongdoing. He said he would prove the criminal allegations amounted to "lies" and suggested that the complainants were motivated by money.
Still, the charges — and media reports suggesting corporate assets may have helped facilitate sexual misconduct — prompted one of Stronach's granddaughters, Selena Stronach, to probe for answers.
Granddaughter takes on Stronach Group
Already locked in a long-standing legal battle over family riches, the lawyers for 23-year-old Selena filed a new motion, alleging "it is likely that records exist which reveal a pattern of misconduct by Mr. Stronach that includes corporate knowledge and, potentially, facilitation and coverup."
Frank Stronach initially made a fortune from Magna International, the auto parts manufacturer he launched in 1957. He later spun off subsidiaries specializing in horse racing and entertainment that now fall under the Stronach Group. Frank Stronach is no longer directly involved in either firm.
Selena Stronach's lawyers recently asked a judge to order Stronach Group executives, including her aunt, Belinda, to hand over any documents — such as non-disclosure agreements and payment records — related to sexual misconduct complaints against Frank Stronach.
The motion is part of a broader civil suit brought by Selena and her father, Andrew Stronach, who claim Belinda and others have mismanaged the family fortune. The case is scheduled to go to trial next month.
Anastakis, the business historian, said the civil suit is about more than the family's multibillion-dollar fortune.
"I think at stake is as much legacy issues as it is financial futures and fortunes," he said, adding the second- and third-generation Stronachs are likely keen to distance themselves from the patriarch's tarnished reputation.
Accounts detailing the youngest Stronach's lifestyle vary.
As of 2021, Selena shared a 15,000-square-foot home in Aurora, Ont., north of Toronto, with her mother, Kathleen, on the Stronach farm, where Selena also kept cattle. According to court filings, she blamed Belinda for cutting off funding for renovations, which left the residence with incomplete plumbing, loose wiring and unfinished walls and without "a functional kitchen for years."
Belinda Stronach's lawyers called the description of Selena's living arrangements "absurd." They said the young woman had used a family trust to buy a luxury home in Vancouver when she was 19.
According to a 2019 article in Toronto Life magazine, Selena's lawyers once acknowledged she was "raised in an environment in which no event, experience, consumer purchase or travel has been denied."
Court documents suggest Andrew Stronach "owns over 100 properties" in Canada and the United States.
Stronachs let lawyers talk in court
On Thursday, at least 14 lawyers representing the family's warring factions crowded into a downtown Toronto courtroom for an all-day hearing on Selena's motion.
While Belinda's children, equestrian Nicole Walker and globetrotting DJ Frank Walker, live relatively public lives, their cousin has shied away from the spotlight.
An online search reveals so few images of Selena, journalists in the courtroom on Thursday whispered to each other, wondering whether a young woman with dark hair in a back corner of the courtroom could be her.
It wasn't. None of the Stronachs followed the proceedings in person.
The youngest Stronach's lawyer even declined to say whether Selena could be seen in a photo taken last year at a company-owned thoroughbred horse-racing complex in Florida.
Selena
Stronach's lawyer, Matthew Gottlieb, addresses Justice Peter Osborne in
the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Toronto on Thursday. (Alexandra Newbould/CBC)
"I can neither confirm nor deny," Matthew Gottlieb said when a reporter showed him the photo and asked whether the caption was correct in identifying his client.
Addressing Ontario Superior Court Justice Peter Osborne, Gottlieb insisted that if the Stronach Group paid to cover up complaints against the family patriarch, CEO Belinda Stronach and her predecessor, Alon Ossip, surely would have known.
Ossip's lawyer, Mark Gelowitz, dismissed the claims as a "cascade of conjecture."
"This is a tactical attempt by Selena to introduce these allegations against Belinda and Alon in order to embarrass them in a case that has attracted the attention of the media," Gelowitz told the court.
Belinda Stronach — a former Conservative MP for Newmarket—Aurora who was once best known for crossing the floor in 2005 to join the Liberal cabinet — is no stranger to legal battles within the family.
In 2020, control of the Stronach fortune was split after she and her father settled a high-profile lawsuit pitting Belinda against her parents.
"I am glad that our disagreements have been resolved amongst ourselves," Frank Stronach said in a statement at the time.
His wife of 60 years, Elfriede, died in March at the age of 80.
Reached by phone on Friday, Frank Stronach said he had no comment on the latest civil case involving his children and grandchildren.
"There will be a time when there's more to say," he added.
Commentary from Chambers, Benchmark and our clients states that Matt — “… ranks among the market’s leading trial lawyers,” and “… is a prominent figure in Toronto's commercial litigation market. He is particularly respected for his insolvency disputes practice ... has a well-deserved reputation for his advocacy skills." And that "Matthew Gottlieb is an excellent lawyer." Matt was named “Lawyer of the Year” in Bet-the-Company Litigation by Best Lawyers 2022 and is ranked as one of the Top 50 Trial Lawyers in Canada by Benchmark Litigation.
https://socialmiami.com/socialmanny-episode-312/

Mark A. Gelowitz
Alon S. Ossip
Description
This document is a statement of defence filed by Alon Ossip in response to a statement of claim by Frank Stronach and Elfriede Stronach. Alon admits some allegations in the statement of claim and denies others. He provides background on his long career working for Frank Stronach and various Stronach family businesses. He asserts that Frank's business judgment has declined and led to financial issues. Alon argues he has acted properly and fulfilled all duties, building substantial wealth for the Stronach family, and that the allegations against him are without foundation.https://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com/pdf/tdn/2018/tdn181011.pdfTDN HEADLINE NEWS THETDN.COM
STRONACH FAMILY RIFT REVEALED IN BOMBSHELL LAWSUIT
Belinda and Frank Stronach photosrun his empire, Belinda Stronach, has mismanaged the family's chief assets and trust funds while forcing her father out of control of the fortune he created.
According to the suit, Frank Stronach is also seeking three separate forms of financial redress:
after having concealed their actions from Frank [and other family members] during the period from at least 2011 to November 2016 when Belinda and Alon took the position, for the first time, that Frank was no longer in control of, and had no role in running, the family empire.
Cont. p4
Ossip's attorney, Mark Gelowitz, confirmed via email that his client has authorized a spokesperson, Paul Deegan, to issue the following statement:
reality. Alon has always honored his obligations and acted in
good faith to preserve and grow the Stronach family's assets and
to protect the interests of all members of the family. Alon
created huge wealth for the family, and he has always operated
in a prudent and commercially sensible manner. Frank Stronach
was a great auto parts entrepreneur, but his recent excessive
spending and numerous failed ventures put his family=s wealth
at risk. This is a dispute between Stronach family members that
should be resolved between family members.
The rags-to-riches rise of the Austrian-born Frank Stronach is
well known within the racing industry, and he has been honored
with numerous awards during his ascent from a small-scale
Ontario horse owner and breeder to a global Thoroughbred
power player. Over the course of six decades, he concurrently
enjoyed commercial success as an auto-parts magnate, and
several of his early racing holdings were intertwined with that
firm, Magna International.
As Frank Stronach's scope and scale of investment within
Thoroughbred racing grew, he formed Magna Entertainment
Corporation (MEC) in 1999 to keep his racing interests separate
from the automotive business.
Belinda Stronach came on board with MEC in 2001 as its chief
executive, although she briefly stepped away shortly thereafter
for a run in Canadian politics.
Over the decades, as his wealth grew, Frank Stronach formed various trusts to share the fortune with family members.
According to the suit, even though other family members were eventually named as trustees, it was understood that the patriarch would always retain Super Trustee status.
In September 2013, Frank Stronach stepped away from his racing ventures and resigned leadership positions with two family trusts in order to fulfill a lifelong goal of leading a party that would get elected to the Austrian Parliament. His party got voted in, but by January 2014 he resigned from its active leadership and returned to Ontario to re-immerse himself in TSG, assuming that everything was business as usual. But according to Frank Stronach's version of events detailed in the lawsuit, it wasn't.
In fact, the suit contends, it wasn't until November 2016 that, Belinda and Alon informed Frank for the first time that TSG was facing significant liquidity issues. This came as a surprise to Frank and raised red flags about their management of TSG.
The suit then details a litany of alleged power plays initiated by Belinda Stronach and Ossip, including their refusal to let Frank Stronach act on routine business transactions. Belinda and Alon were confrontational, disrespectful andinsubordinate, the suit alleges. They demanded that Frank take steps to rein in or terminate all expenditures and investments being made by him on behalf of TSGY. Belinda and Alon also took the position, for the first time, that Frank had no authority to act in the name of any of the businesses owned or operated by TSGY. They asserted that Frank had no signing authority or ability to access corporate funds.
Ossip, according to the suit, also threatened to fire any TSG employees who carried out orders from Frank Stronach. Alon belittled and embarrassed Frank, and did so with the blessing and encouragement of Belinda, the suit contends.
Eventually, Frank Stronach insisted to his daughter that Ossip be terminated. The suit alleges that Belinda Stronach only paid lip service to her father's request, telling him that Ossip would be suspended and play no further role in TSG business, when in reality, the two allegedly Acollaborated covertly to keep Frank Stronach from figuring out that Ossip was still actively involved.
other [non-racing] assets that form part of the Stronach family empire.
TWIRLING CANDY FILLY HEADING TO BC8
Ashbrook Farm and BBN Racing'sConcrete Rose(Twirling Candy),
stretching out off an impressive debut win at Saratoga, had no issue
with two turns and blew her competition away in the GII JPMorgan
Chase Jessamine S. Wednesday at Keeneland.
PUBLISHER & CEO
Sue Morris Finley @suefinley
suefinley@thetdn.com
V.P., INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
Gary King @garykingTDN
garyking@thetdn.com
EDITORIAL
editor@thetdn.com
Editor-in-Chief
Jessica Martini @JessMartiniTDN
Managing Editor
Alan Carasso @EquinealTDN
Senior Editor
Steve Sherack @SteveSherackTDN
Racing Editor
Brian DiDonato @BDiDonatoTDN
News and Features Editor
Ben Massam @BMassamTDN
Associate Editors
Christie DeBernardis @CDeBernardisTDN
Joe Bianca @JBiancaTDN
ADVERTISING
advertising@thetdn.com
Director of Advertising
Alycia Borer
Advertising Manager
Lia Best
Advertising Designer
Amanda Crelin
Advertising Assistants
Alexa Reisfield
Amie Morosco
Advertising Assistant/Dir. of Distribution
Rachel McCaffrey
Photo Editor
Sarah K. Andrew @SarahKAndrew
photos@thetdn.com
Social Media Strategist
Justina Severni
Director of Customer Service
Vicki Forbes
customerservice@thetdn.com
Marketing Manager
Alayna Cullen @AlaynaCullen
Director of Information Technology
Ray Villa
rayvilla@thetdn.com
Bookkeeper
Terry May
media.vista@verizon.net
WORLDWIDE INFORMATION
International Editor
Kelsey Riley @kelseynrileyTDN
kelseynriley@thetdn.com
European Editor
Emma Berry
emmaberry@thetdn.com
Associate International Editor
Heather Anderson @HLAndersonTDN
Newmarket Bureau, Cafe Racing
Sean Cronin & Tom Frary
caferacing@thetdn.com
60 Broad Street, Suite 100
Red Bank, NJ 07701
732-747-8060 | 732-747-8955 (fax)
www.TheTDN.com
Top T-Bred Owner Gill Irate
According
to a report, top thoroughbred owner Michael Gill is livid. The
Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission has lifted its ban on the
controversial owner, but the move has come after he has sold his horses
and stepped
away from the industry.
This past February, Gill and his trainer, Tony Adamo, were barred from racing horses at Penn National Race Course after jockeys and trainers refused to enter races in which Gill had a horse participating. The position taken by the jockeys and trainers was that they feared Gill's horses breaking down and hurting others during the races.
"I have a family, I have kids and no job and I didn't do anything wrong, or at least I haven't been told what I did wrong," Adamo said during an interview with fox43.com. The trainer is now allowed to race once again, but virtually all of his stock he had to work with is now gone.
In regard to being cleared once he had sold off all of his stock, Gill said: "When I'm all out of business, only have a couple of horses left, what? Everybody's innocent? No one did anything wrong? No findings? How corrupt is that?"
(With files from fox43.com)
Judge: Adamo, Gill Can Sue PHRC
According to a report, a federal judge in the United States has ruled that thoroughbred horse owner Michael Gill and trainer Anthony Adamo can sue racing commissioners in Pennsylvania in regard to having been banned from running their horses at Penn National Race Course
in early 2010.
An article on courthousenews.com states that Adamo and Gill cited civil rights violations in their suit against six past and present officials with the Pennsylvania Horse Racing Commission.
According to the report, the commission had banned the duo on the basis that they were racing horses which were unsound and thus dangerous. The commission had also taken the position that the pair could not present a feasible civil rights claim based on the merits of due process because as licensees they did not hold property rights (the commission took the position that the licenses were a privilege, not a right).
U.S. District Judge Sylvia Rambo did not agree.
"Defendants' argument that the language of the statute expressly precludes a procedural due process claim is somewhat perplexing in light of the hearing rights guaranteed to a licensee facing ejection," Rambo wrote. She went on to say, "The state law has engendered a clear expectation of continued enjoyment of the licenses absent proof of culpable conduct by plaintiffs. This is enough to create a property interest in plaintiffs' licenses, notwithstanding the statutory language to the contrary."
In January, 2010, twenty-five jockeys at Penn National Race Course banded together and refused to ride in races in which Gill-owned horses were participating. The jockeys stated that the form of the Gill-owned horses were putting them at risk. A number of Gill's horses had been euthanized after having been involved in accidents over the Penn National course.
"You cannot believe how worried we are for our own safety and the safety of all the horses," jockey Thomas Clifton was quoted as saying afterward.
"I tell everybody: They can go to my farm, my barn, they can inspect every one of my horses," Gill was quoted as saying. "I never ask for any special treatment. All I ask for is to be treated fairly."
(With files from courthousenews.com)
Former Magna executive Don Amos dies at 73
Ron Gierkink Feb 12, 2018
ETOBICOKE, Ontario – Owner, breeder, and former racing executive Don Amos died at age 73 on Feb. 8 at the Sheridan Villa in Mississauga, Ontario.
Amos, a native of Barrie, Ontario, was the Ontario Jockey Club’s vice president of Woodbine Sales prior to joining Magna International in 1984. He was eventually appointed as chief operating officer of Magna Entertainment, before retiring from the company in 2006.
Amos owned and bred Swingin On Ice, who captured the Grade 2 Beaumont Stakes at Keeneland in 1999 for trainer Josie Carroll.
A private funeral and celebration of Amos’ life will be held at a later date. Memorial donations may be made to the Sheridan Villa, the Long Run Thoroughbred Adoption Society, or the Alzheimer’s Society.
Belinda Stronach Regains CEO Job at Horseracing Firm, Cementing Control
Belinda Stronach and Frank Stronach
Photographer: Donald Weber/Getty Images North AmericaAlon Ossip stepped down as chief executive officer of Stronach Group, making way for Belinda Stronach, seven months after her family agreed to settle a long and public feud.
Ossip “had been on a leave of absence since January 2017, so his formal resignation
Friday. The terms of Ossip’s departure by “mutual agreement” are confidential, the company said.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/stronach-family-feud-1.5685540
Stronachs settle family feud
Patriarch Frank will control one portion while second part will be under control of daughter Belinda
A high-profile feud among members of the Stronach family has been settled.
Under a settlement announced by The Stronach Group, control of the family fortune is basically split between two factions.
Former politician and business executive Belinda Stronach will remain chairwoman and president of The Stronach Group, with full control of its horse racing, gaming, real estate and related assets.
Her Austrian-born parents, Frank and Elfriede Stronach, will assume full ownership and control of a stallion and breeding business, all farm operations in North America and all European assets.
The family fortune was founded by Frank Stronach, who built the global Magna automotive manufacturing business — where Belinda worked for a time before entering federal politics.
Father and daughter issued a joint statement saying they were glad their disagreements had been settled.
The $500-Million Family Feud
Frank Stronach spent decades grooming his daughter, Belinda, to take over his billion-dollar business. Now he wants it back

On a cold grey morning last April, Ontario Superior Court judge Glenn A. Hainey held a routine scheduling hearing in his chambers on University Avenue. One by one, the country’s most high-powered corporate litigators filed into the room. There were friendly handshakes, there was collegial kibitzing, there was even some jovial laughter. It was the latest hearing in the Stronach family trust dispute—a case that’s tearing apart one of Canada’s wealthiest families and galvanizing the best legal minds on Bay Street.
One of the first to arrive was Kent Thomson, the ferociously adversarial corporate litigator from Davies representing Frank Stronach, the 86-year-old patriarch. Acting for Frank’s daughter, Belinda, was Michael Barrack, a veteran partner at Blakes whose LinkedIn profile describes his courtroom style as “street fighter meets master chess player.” Also present were counsel for various other Stronachs who’ve entered the fray, including Frank’s son, Andrew, and all three Stronach grandchildren, Frank Jr., Nicole and Selena. Among those lawyers were Alan Mark, a partner at Goodmans; Matthew Gottlieb, managing partner at Lax O’Sullivan; and Linda Plumpton, a senior commercial litigator from Torys. Mark Gelowitz, a respected litigator at Osler, was there on behalf of Frank’s one-time protégé, Alon Ossip. Tom Curry, the legendary litigator and a managing partner at Lenczner Slaght representing Frank’s wife, Elfriede, turned up late and had to hover by the door. One lawyer who was present later said it felt less like a scheduling hearing than a reception for the American College of Trial Lawyers. “We were all looking at the door, like, ‘Seriously? Anyone else?’ ” By the time the judge was ready to begin, it was standing room only, with 22 lawyers crammed in.
The family is battling for control of the Stronach Group, a complex collection of trusts, corporations and other entities Frank set up after he left Magna International, the multi-billion-dollar auto parts empire he founded in 1957. Last October, after a fruitless mediation, Frank filed an excoriating 73-page statement of claim against Belinda and Ossip, the Stronach Group’s CEO and formerly Frank’s close friend. Frank, who declined interview requests for this story through his lawyer, demanded more than $500 million, alleging his daughter and protégé defrauded him to gain control of the family fortune, which they deny. The document burns with explosive patriarchal rage, concluding with Frank’s demand that Belinda and Ossip be removed as trustees of the family trust.
Even Frank’s friends told me they were startled by the vitriol of the claim, which is an unmitigated attempt to destroy his daughter’s reputation. “I bet he thought he’d just fire off an angry shot, scare the hell out of everyone and then the whole thing would be over in a couple of weeks,” says a source close to the family.
Instead, Frank unleashed decades’ worth of repressed family acrimony: Belinda filed her own claim against her father, while her brother and niece sued her. The members of one of Canada’s wealthiest dynasties are now openly accusing each other of reckless spending, incompetent leadership and outright fraud. Their dysfunctional machinations have been laid bare in a web of litigation so complex it could keep them bound up in court for years to come. Frank and Belinda’s mutual intransigence isn’t surprising to anyone who knows them well. They’re people who cleave to the hard, glittering surface of life—street scrappers with the ability to bankroll armies. But unlike most wars, theirs isn’t just about power or money. It’s also about love.
Frank Stronach emigrated from Austria to Canada in 1954, when he was 21. Three years later, he set up a tool and die shop in a garage near Dupont and Dufferin. The business expanded rapidly, growing with Canada’s burgeoning manufacturing sector, and in 1969 the company merged with Magna Electronics, a publicly traded industrial parts manufacturer. Frank bought Beechwood Farm in Aurora and married a young Austrian woman named Elfriede. Their daughter, Belinda, was born in 1966. A son, Andrew, followed two years later.
In an interview, Belinda Stronach described her childhood as normal. “My parents were traditional and European in their approach to family,” she said. “My dad worked and my mom stayed at home.” Frank’s all-consuming toil paid off. By the mid-’70s, Magna International was a global leader in auto parts manufacturing. His leadership style could be draconian: he was autocratic and irascible, a man who operated on gut instinct and refused to apologize for it. His biographer, Wayne Lilley, described Stronach as “a genius and a buffoon wrapped together.” And yet his unorthodox style generated great personal wealth. As they say in business, you can’t argue with results.
Frank realized early on that Andrew, his only son, was never going to take up the mantle of power. Andrew inherited his father’s obsessive nature and meticulous attention to detail, but not his charisma or garrulousness. Frank did his best to ignore his son’s difference, allowing him to pursue his own interests. As a boy, Andrew discovered a passion for agriculture, which became the central focus of his life. In 1997, he married Kathleen Flannery, a waitress and graphic design student, and they had a daughter, Selena, in 2000. They later split—but never divorced—and Andrew moved to Prince Edward County, where he bought vast swaths of land to raise cattle. He’s now one of the county’s biggest private landowners.
Belinda took a different path. She grew into the quintessential golden girl: athletic, popular and vivacious, with a robust work ethic. She welcomed the spotlight that came with her family name, and from a young age regularly appeared at public events with her father. Frank adored his daughter. He praised her constantly, publicly extolling her beauty and brilliance, and on her 16th birthday, he gave her a silver Camaro Z-28, a special-edition Indy pace car. Despite the family’s wealth, Frank sent his children to Newmarket High, the local public secondary school, ostensibly to keep them grounded. Belinda went on to study business at York University but dropped out after a year to work for her father. Two years later, when she was just 22, Frank appointed her to the board of directors. While formal education wasn’t important to Frank—he left school at 14—hard work and obedience were everything. He didn’t just encourage the young Belinda to pursue her dreams. He told her what to dream, then made it come true.
Belinda entered the family business during a time of epic change. The company nearly went bankrupt after the stock market crash of 1987, and she watched as Frank ushered Magna through this rocky period. He implemented a “no debt” policy, which would later help the company emerge relatively unscathed from the 2008 financial crisis. Belinda rose through the ranks quickly—too quickly in the eyes of some associates—from vice-president to executive vice-president. In the late ’80s, she struck up a romance with Don Walker, then Magna’s VP of operations and later its president and CEO. The union delighted Frank and produced two children, Frank Jr. and Nicole, but it didn’t last. The couple separated in 1995.
In the 1990s, Magna became more profitable than ever. In 1992 it went public on the New York Stock Exchange, and by the turn of the millennium, Forbes had named it the world’s top auto parts company, with annual sales of $9.3 billion (U.S.). Publicly, Frank was the emblem of Canadian entrepreneurialism—a by-the-bootstraps immigrant with a penchant for big dreams and tough talk. Behind the scenes, he was a cantankerous, controlling patriarch. As one associate put it, “If you went out to dinner with Frank, he would tell you where to sit and what to eat. And he meant it.” He disliked criticism and was prone to flights of fancy. He would hire and fire on a whim, often turning on people he perceived to be insubordinate.
Emboldened by his success, Frank embarked on a slew of outlandish passion projects, including a theme park outside Vienna called World of Wonder and a transatlantic luxury airline called Magna Air. Neither came to fruition. At the end of the century, Frank formed Magna Entertainment Corp. to buy and develop racetracks. The company became the largest owner and operator of thoroughbred tracks in North America. But some Magna shareholders disliked Frank’s tendency to commit company money to what they saw as hare-brained schemes. They were furious when Magna bought the Santa Anita racetrack in 1998 for $126 million (U.S.)—they had invested in a successful auto parts company, not a pony player. To quell their concerns, Frank signed an agreement the following year restricting Magna’s ability to branch out into non-automotive agreements until 2006.
The cornerstone of Frank’s empire was his sprawling Aurora compound, which he built in the ’90s as the company’s Canadian headquarters. Housed in a vast building with European-style pitched roofs, the Magna headquarters was designed to resemble an Austrian château. He also built Magna Golf Club, a 7,300-yard course, as well as a courtyard and an artificial lake. He designed three residences: one for himself and Elfriede, one for Andrew and Kathleen, and one for Belinda and her kids. The houses were opulent mansions in the faux-Regency style, complete with swimming pools and garage space for multiple luxury cars.
Frank started thinking seriously about succession in the early 2000s. By that point, he’d established the Stronach family trust, naming his family as beneficiaries and ensuring that his empire would remain within the family and out of creditors’ hands. He arranged matters so the trust owned his Magna voting shares, through which he controlled the company. He also appointed himself super-trustee, endowed with the power to appoint and remove all other trustees. And in 2001, he named Belinda CEO of Magna, cementing her as his heir apparent.
Three years later, she stunned Bay Street by quitting Magna to pursue a political career. She won a seat as a Conservative MP—Stephen Harper spoke admiringly of the “glamour” she brought to the dull arena of Canadian politics—but in 2005, she famously crossed the floor into Paul Martin’s Liberal cabinet. After Harper beat the Liberals in 2006, she surprised no one by announcing she would leave politics to resume her role at Magna, which, unlike the Liberal party, was booming.
While his daughter was in office, Frank met a young tax lawyer named Alon Ossip. The two men could hardly have been more different. Where Frank was loud, controlling and impulsive, Ossip was a soft-spoken workaholic, obsessed with the intricacies of business and the law. He grew up in a wealthy north Toronto family, graduated from Osgoode then practised tax law at Goodman and Carr. There was something about Ossip that Frank instantly liked. After just a few meetings, he offered him the role of executive vice-president at Magna.
In legal and business circles, Ossip is a polarizing character. He has a reputation for arrogance and a tendency to think he’s the smartest guy in the room. Others praise his obsessive drive and credit him with generating much of the Stronach family fortune. If Shakespeare were writing the Stronach family saga, Ossip would be the outsider who stands in the shadows, whispering into the ears of the powerful lead players. In the coming years, he became bound as tightly to Frank and Belinda by money as they are by blood.
When Belinda returned to Magna, Frank embarked on another round of kooky, money-losing side ventures, including an electric bike company and an Austrian-themed energy drink that was shut down after the test-market phase. (Its ad campaign featured a lederhosen-clad model with the slogan “Keeps you yodelling all night long!”) There were charitable ventures, too: he built a housing project in Louisiana for 300 survivors of Hurricane Katrina, called Magnaville.
He also focused more on his agricultural pursuits. Frank bought his first thoroughbred in 1962 and later purchased several major American racetracks and a world-class horse-breeding operation near Versailles, Kentucky. Beginning in 2010, Frank acquired 90,000 acres of land in Ocala, Florida—which bills itself as America’s horse capital—and founded Adena Farms, which he envisioned as an all-natural, grass-fed-cattle farm. Employing a small army of agricultural workers, he converted the land into pasture and built a small-scale meat-processing plant with the capacity to slaughter 600 cattle per week. Over the next six years, the Stronachs spent nearly $300 million to develop Frank’s livestock business.
As his fascination with animal husbandry expanded, so did the scope of his dreams. He built a private members’ golf and country club where he planned to develop 120 luxury residences. He opened two restaurants—Frankey’s and Adena Grill and Wine Bar—and planned a chain of retail shops that would carry Adena Farms beef. An hour and a half down the road, he discovered a grove of mature oak trees, which inspired him to start an organic hog operation to produce acorn-fed pork. Because the hog farm was so far from the cattle operation, it would require its own meat-processing facility, which would cost $60 million (U.S.) to build.
Adena lost money, and lots of it. While beloved by equestrians, Ocala isn’t a particularly good place for raising grass-fed cattle—it simply doesn’t have the necessary nutrient-rich grasses or soil. One former employee told me the hog operation was particularly foolhardy: there was plenty of land available near the cattle farm. “Frank had his ideas and he wasn’t listening to reason,” said the employee, who was eventually fired.
According to Belinda and Ossip, Frank enacted his ideas by decree—there were no business plans, and he ignored independent market research. “He had absolutely no compunction about spending loads of cash, even when the business was draining money,” said one person close to the farm. “And there was no follow-up and no one to manage him.” Some Adena executives began to call the farm Frank’s Field of Dreams.
The most outrageous example of Frank’s spending came in 2012, when he commissioned a gargantuan statue of Pegasus as a statement piece and tourist attraction for Magna’s newly completed Florida racetrack, Gulfstream Park. Frank did the initial sketches himself, of a giant winged horse locked in battle to the death with a fire-breathing dragon. In the end, two statues were built and cast in bronze. One sits in Gulfstream Park today and the other—a perfect replica—is held in storage in China. At 12 storeys high, the statue towers over the park. The project, originally budgeted at $6 million, eventually ran to $55 million. In planning the statue, Frank also drew up plans for a “Pegasus Park” on the Gulfstream site, which was to include a roller coaster, a carousel, a lavish pony barn, a horse museum and a 5-D theatre inside the statue. This never came to pass, because Belinda intervened. Many people questioned Frank’s taste and business sense, but if that bothered him, he didn’t show it. He’d made the family fortune. Why shouldn’t he spend it how he liked?
In May 2010, Frank made one of the most surprising moves in Canadian business history. He relinquished his majority shareholder voting rights at Magna, which he’d used to keep an iron grip on power for three decades, in a deal valued at $983 million. The following year, Ossip orchestrated a second deal worth an additional $700 million: the Stronachs agreed to give up the rest of their voting rights in exchange for Magna’s horse-racing and gaming assets. Once again, Frank made off with a fortune. When the deal was done, the Stronachs formed the Stronach Group to manage their accumulated wealth in trust, as well as four main business divisions: racetracks and gaming; real estate development; agriculture; and breeding, training and racing. The family rewarded Ossip generously, signing over a five per cent interest in key Stronach Group assets outside the family trust. And with her father’s support, Belinda offered him the job of CEO of the newly formed Stronach Group. She’d serve as chair.
With Frank gone and Ossip as CEO, Belinda became the new face of the Stronach family. Although she’d never been a horse lover, she used her public profile to rebrand the long-declining sport of thoroughbred racing. Since taking over, Belinda has persuaded a raft of celebrities to attend her races, including the chef Bobby Flay, New England Patriots coach Bill Belichick and musicians Ne-Yo and Post Malone. Earlier this year, after 23 mysterious horse deaths on the Santa Anita track in just a few months, Belinda garnered a wave of positive press for using the crisis as an opportunity to modernize the sport. She proposed a long list of safety and welfare changes to the California Horse Racing Board, almost all of which were accepted. These included prohibiting jockeys from using a whip except in safety-related situations, and adjusting horse medication rules. Under Belinda’s leadership, the racing and gaming group’s sales almost doubled in the past five years, with revenues of $1.1 billion (U.S.) in 2017.
Rather than delighting Frank, his daughter’s growing success seemed to spur resentment: Belinda was overshadowing him. He became more obsessed with Adena Farms. Increasingly exasperated with the growing expense of her father’s hobby farm, Belinda dispatched Ossip to try to convince Frank to curtail spending. Through those first post-Magna years, Ossip contends that his role was increasingly one of damage control for Frank’s lavish and unrealistic passion projects.
During this time of mounting tension, Ossip adds, his relationships with both Belinda and her father were warm and respectful. He was Frank’s best friend. At social gatherings, Frank would introduce him as his “partner.” The two men spent every New Year’s Eve together in Florida with Ossip’s family. But as Ossip’s allegiance slowly shifted from the elder Stronach to the younger, Frank’s carefully laid succession plan began to unravel.
In 2012, Frank founded an Austrian political party called Team Stronach. He was always a staunch conservative, but by the time Team Stronach was born, his political opinions had veered just slightly to the left of Attila the Hun. Stronach later outlined his personal world view in a 2017 self-published book, The Question of All Questions: Where Are We Going and Where Did We Come From?, which features the famed Pegasus-dragon statue on the cover. The book is a rambling polemic about the nature of good and evil and the travesty of over-regulation and taxation. He recommends, among other things, offering cash payments of up to $500 for voluntary sterilization to curb population growth, putting poor residents to work on government-run urban farms so they can reconnect with the natural world, and separating children from parents who suffer from addiction or mental illness so they can be brought up in “government-supported child-care homes.”
Frank financed Team Stronach with funds from the Stronach Group. In the end, the party won 11 seats, including Frank’s own, making it the fifth-largest party in the fragmented Austrian parliament. He relocated to Austria to take up his seat on the backbench, but it wasn’t long before the Austrian tax authorities showed up on his doorstep. As a member of the legislature, Frank had to disclose his financial information. In 2013, he resigned from all corporate positions at the Stronach Group, including his role as super-trustee of the family trust. He appointed Belinda in his stead, giving her ultimate power over all decisions regarding the family coffers. Ossip, who was paid an annual salary of $1 million in addition to his share of certain family assets, was added as a trustee as well, as were Belinda’s kids, Frank Jr. and Nicole. The balance of power had shifted heavily to Belinda’s side of the family.
The same day Belinda was appointed as super-trustee, something strange took place: the Stronach Group’s in-house counsel created a set of undated documents declaring Frank Jr. and Nicole’s resignation as trustees and Frank Sr.’s reappointment. These documents, known as the “reappointment instruments,” are the central issue of dispute in the Stronach family drama. Frank claims he requested them with a view to resuming his position as super-trustee if he ever wished to do so, and that all parties understood that the documents would become effective when he chose to reappoint himself.
Belinda and Ossip deny this was ever the case. According to Belinda, such an intention would mean Frank’s resignation was a sham designed to avoid Austrian public-disclosure requirements. She maintains that the documents were created at Ossip’s request because he was worried he’d be left with only Frank Jr. and Nicole as co-trustees in the event of Belinda’s death or incapacity (she has a history of breast cancer). Both Belinda and Ossip say that Frank had no involvement in the documents’ creation.
Frank lasted just a few months on the backbenches of Austrian politics. “I rattled the cage. I said what had to be said. I’m so independent I don’t have to suck up to anyone,” he said at the time. He returned home in January 2014 and resumed work on Adena Farms, buying and selling Stronach Group assets, and expanding the business, which was sucking up vast amounts of money. He says he believed the reappointment documents had taken effect—and accuses Belinda and Ossip of knowingly deluding him into thinking he was still in power. Instead of telling him he no longer had legal signing authority, Frank contends, they signed off on contracts he executed after the fact to preserve his delusion. He argues that Belinda and Ossip created a Truman Show–like world in which he was the boss, when they knew he had no legal authority and could be banished on a whim. Belinda and Ossip categorically deny participating in any deception. They say Frank had largely stepped away from the family business years earlier, and that he created his “delusion” narrative in a flailing attempt to resume control.
In 2015, Frank opened Adena Golf and Country Club in Marion County, Florida. The same year, Belinda established a company of her own: Acasta Enterprises, launched with Tony Melman, formerly of Onex Corp., and Geoff Beattie, the former Thomson family advisor, and billed as Canada’s largest special-purpose acquisition company. It’s a fund that allows public investors to put their money in private equity transactions, particularly in leveraged buyouts of underperforming companies. Though increasingly at odds, father and daughter were finally in sync: Frank’s golf club and Belinda’s company would both go on to bleed money.
Over the next year, Belinda and Ossip regularly discussed Frank’s spending. They say he had become increasingly unwilling to admit his passion projects were not financially viable, even when presented with incontrovertible proof. Ossip says that Frank’s projects had reduced the family’s net worth by $800 million. He and Belinda agreed something radical had to be done.
In December 2016, Ossip informed Frank that the Stronach Group was facing significant liquidity issues and he would need to rein in spending on Adena. Frank claims this was the first he’d heard about it. When he protested, Ossip told him he’d have to take the argument up with his daughter—she was the boss. During this period, Frank says his daughter and Ossip were “confrontational, disrespectful and insubordinate,” though they dispute this. In the following weeks, Belinda pulled rank. She informed her father that his attempts to reappoint himself were ineffective. He had no legal right to act in the name of the business, and if he did, she would undermine him.
Frank responded by ordering Belinda to fire Ossip, whom he’d come to see as the villain who’d played father and daughter against each other for his own enrichment. Belinda was torn. On one side was her father, the man who had given her everything. On the other was her CEO, who had become as indispensable to her as he had once been to Frank. She attempted a compromise. She suspended Ossip, asking him to go on leave until the situation with Frank had cooled down. He agreed.
The family managed to put their differences on hold and spend Christmas together that year. In January, however, the feud resumed. Frank dated the reappointment documents and sent them to Belinda, informing her he had officially reappointed himself as a trustee. Belinda wrote back saying she would not allow him to take control of the family business. She and her father embarked on a mediation and later that year met to sign an agreement saying the Stronach Group would fund anticipated capital and operating expenditures for Adena Farms for the next three years up to a maximum of $40 million (U.S.). Frank was appointed chairman of Adena Farms and given signing authority over all farm expenditures under $1 million.
The truce didn’t last a month. According to Belinda, Frank breached the terms of the ceasefire almost immediately by making plans that exceeded the budget. Frank says he barely spent a cent. Belinda cancelled all the leases for Adena’s proposed retail operation and fired a number of employees without Frank’s knowledge. Then she took over Adena. She shuttered the failing golf club and put the land up for sale at a discount. She alleges that starting in the summer, her father repeatedly cornered her kids, pressuring them to sign documents reappointing him as trustee. She also claims he began doing everything he could to undermine the Stronach Group—that he meddled with company boards and went to the company’s bank, blocking her access to certain funds for which he still had signing power.
Elfriede, Andrew and Andrew’s daughter, Selena, sided with Frank, although their feelings toward Belinda are said to be more hurt than angry. Andrew’s team says she failed to pay attention to Stronach Group duties, prioritizing her own financial interests. Belinda maintains she’s always had the rest of the family’s interests at heart—that her fiduciary duty to protect the family fortune was what sparked the row in the first place.
Christmas 2017 came and went for the family, this time without Frank. Instead, Belinda spent it with her kids and her mother, who was devastated by the family fallout. In August, Belinda presented a proposal to all family members for the division of family assets. She suggested splitting assets based on the current proportional equity interests in the family trust and the businesses the family members were most involved in. Belinda and her kids would get the racing and gaming businesses, and Andrew, Selena and Elfriede would get the non-racing and non-gaming assets, including the agriculture group. In addition, there would be a large cash payout from Belinda to Andrew. The proposal went unanswered by all family members.
The Stronachs remained at a standoff, their guns pointed but no one willing to pull the trigger. And then Belinda sold the company jet—a luxury enjoyed by the entire family but primarily used by Frank. Several people suggested it was the jet sale, more than anything else, that prompted Frank to sue. “You have to understand the mentality,” one employee said. “Frank Stronach hadn’t flown commercial in well over 40 years.”
As the sale was being finalized, Frank filed suit against Ossip, Belinda and her two children, seeking to regain control of the family empire. A few weeks later, Andrew sued his sister, seeking to oust her and her children as trustees and supporting Frank’s reinstatement. In the new year, Belinda filed a lengthy statement of defence and counterclaim. Kathleen Stronach filed for divorce from Andrew, in what friends say was an effort to formalize their long-term separation and secure financial support. And finally, in February, 18-year-old Selena filed suit against her aunt Belinda. There are now four outstanding claims, and none of the allegations have been proven in court. It’s a mess of epic proportions with no resolution in sight.
These days, the Stronachs’ Aurora family compound looks more like a luxury ghost town. Belinda lives and works in a Yorkville condo. She recently purchased an office building on Hazelton for more than $5 million and is renovating it to be the Stronach Group’s new downtown headquarters. Frank, who spent decades travelling back and forth from Austria, now spends much of his time in Florida. Andrew has been in Prince Edward County for decades and avoids Aurora as much as possible.
The only people remaining at the compound are Kathleen and Selena, who have strained relationships with the rest of the Stronachs. They live in Residence 3, a 15,000-square-foot home that Kathleen helped design and decorate 22 years ago. Selena owns a cattle farm called Daisy Springs. According to her lawyers, she was “raised in an environment in which no event, experience, consumer purchase or travel has been denied.” And yet several sources close to the case assured me that Selena and her mother are veritable outcasts, rarely invited to family events and uninvolved with the family business.
Belinda’s children live a much more conspicuous life. Frank Jr. and Nicole are still close to their grandparents, despite the fact that they are suing each other for millions. Nicole is a competitive equestrian, and Frank Jr. is an EDM producer and DJ. Both are listed as official trustees and vice-presidents of the Stronach Group and receive substantial annual salaries despite having little to do with the running of the business.
Frank Sr., for his part, appears to have a new succession plan in the works, should he win back control of the Stronach Group in the courts. In late April, he appeared on stage at the Embassy Suites Hotel in Arcadia, California, just down the road from the Stronach Group’s Santa Anita Park, and announced to a crowd of 200 that he would put the company’s racing properties in a trust and allow “horsemen” to operate the business. His daughter, not surprisingly, met his proposed act of beneficence with deep skepticism. “My father recently proposed that we give away our racing and gaming business. I am not sure what he will think of next,” she recently told Toronto Life.“The fact that he sued me and my children because he wants to raise beef cattle in Florida ... is still unfathomable to me.” When asked if she believed her father’s mental state was deteriorating, she responded with dry diplomacy. “My father is in his late 80s and focused on his legacy, including building a $55-million statue of winged Pegasus and a fire-breathing dragon.”
Chris MacLeod, a lawyer at Cambridge LLP who has known Frank since the late 1980s, argues that Frank’s business judgment is sound. “Belinda and Alon supported Frank’s involvement in that business for years, and only began to criticize his involvement in the business well after it was established,” he says. “Their criticisms concerning Frank’s so-called ‘passion projects’ are neither fair nor accurate, and fail to recognize that Magna itself was one of Frank’s first passion projects. So was the racing and gaming business of the Stronach Group, which Belinda and Alon now characterize as its most valuable and successful asset.”
The cynical old chestnut about lawyers being the only winners has never applied so neatly as it does in the ongoing battle of the Stronachs. By the date of the hearing last April, millions had been spent. At last count, there were well over 50 corporate lawyers working on the case, including associates and underlings. Factor in the Stronach Group’s in-house counsel, private lawyers, PR representatives, reputation-management firms, mediators, consultants and other professionals, and you have the population of a small town. Helping the Stronachs diminish and destroy each other is big business these days on Bay Street.
It’s difficult to grasp why anyone would waste a fortune trying to ruin the person they love the most, yet that’s exactly what Frank and Belinda Stronach are doing. Their entire family is now locked in an act of mutually assured destruction. Then again, many family businesses have combusted at the point of friction where love and power intersect. The Bronfmans lost millions to a family succession battle. So did the Irvings and the Aspers, and the list goes on. The Stronachs’ flame-out is especially spectacular.
As the feud drags on, friends and associates of the Stronachs have been pleading for peace negotiations to resume between Frank and Belinda. According to a source close to the case, the idea of family therapy has been floated repeatedly to all parties involved. For the first time in years, father and daughter seem to be in agreement. It’s never going to happen.
This story originally appeared in the July 2019 issue of Toronto Life magazine. To subscribe, for just $29.95 a year, click here.
Sunday, 14 October 2018
Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the Yankee Mid Term Elections that your fellow lawyers such as Franky Boy McKenna and many other Maritimers may enjoy N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
https://twitter.com/DavidRayAmos/with_replies

David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos
Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the Yankee Mid Term Election that Franky Boy McKenna and many other Maritimers may enjoy N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2018/10/here-is-tale-of-horse-racing-and-3.html
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/frank-belinda-stronach-lawsuit-1.4858150

Frank Stronach sues daughter Belinda for allegedly mismanaging family fortune
Lawsuit in Ontario Superior Court seeks more than $500M in damages
The Canadian Press· Posted: Oct 10, 2018 11:16 PM ET---------- Original message ----------
From: "Barry, Clare"<Clare.Barry@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:12:15 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits
Franky Boy McKenna and many other Maritmers may enjoy
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Je serai absente du bureau le 15 octobre, 2018. Dans mon absence,
veuillez contactez Ginette Mazerolle ou Sam Boorman dans notre bureau
regional.
I will be away from the office on October 15, 2018 inclusive. In my
absence, kindly contact Ginette Mazerolle or Sam Boorman of the
Atlantic Regional Office.
---------- Original message ----------
From: Forsætisráðuneytið <for@for.is>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:12:24 +0000
Subject: Forsætisráðuneytið hefur móttekið tölvupóst þinn / Prime
Minister's Office hereby confirms the receipt of your email.
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Forsætisráðuneytið hefur móttekið tölvupóst þinn / Prime Minister's
Office hereby confirms the receipt of your email.
Vinsamlega ekki svara þessum tölvupósti, hafið samband í gegnum
for@for.is / Do not reply to this email. Contact us with any queries
via for@for.is
Með bestu kveðju / Best regards
------------------------------
Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
Stjórnarráðshúsinu, IS - 101 Reykjavík, Sími/Tel. +354 545 8400
www.stjornarradid.is<http://
Fyrirvari/Disclaimer<http://
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 21:56:06 -0400
Subject: You are the woman who called me a pedophile remember?
To: T F <skywatcher007@msn.com>
Cc: "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
On 10/15/18, T F <skywatcher007@msn.com> wrote:
> I don’t know why or how I got on your Cc list? Do you have something to do
> with that con Carol Roberts aka wheepingwillow2 4U on Youtube that scams and
> harms others? 500 grand settlement from liberty mutual not enough for her
> so off she goes to sue everyone in the world? If so please remove me as
> I’ve been harmed by her and have no use for anyone that is connected to her
> scam.
>
>
>
> Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/
> 10
>
>
>
> ______________________________
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2018 4:58:24 PM
> To: Arseneau, Kevin (DSF-NE)
> Cc: David Amos; michaelc.beck@libertymutual.
> mgill; Maggie; Boston.Mail; washington field; ray@paulickreport.com;
> presidentialsvcteam@
> fin.financepublic-
> clare.barry; daniel.gosselin; mcu; hon.ralph.goodale; Jody.Wilson-Raybould;
> postur; andre; jbosnitch; Rousselle, Serge (LEG); Gallant, Premier Brian
> (PO/CPM); andrew.scheer; maxime.bernier; Gerald.Butts;
> andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca; Norman.Sabourin; Doucet, Rick Hon. (ERD/DER -
> DAAF/MAAP); Coon, David (LEG); Gauvin, Robert (LEG); Mitton, Megan (LEG);
> Austin, Kris (LEG); Frank.McKenna; oldmaison; Robert.E.Lighthizer; Robert.
> Jones; David Amos; stateofcorruptionnh1; PETER.MACKAY; David.Akin; news;
> news; news919; news; Newsroom; darrow.macintyre; Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)
> Subject: Do you understand what you bounced back to me?
>
> On 10/14/18, Arseneau, Kevin (DSF-NE) <kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca> wrote:
>> J'ai reçu ce courriel par erreur
>>
>>
>> Merci et bonne journée!
>> Kevin,
>>
>> Responsable des installations scolaire
>> District scolaire francophone nord-est
>> Téléphone : (506) 394-3407
>> Télécopieur : (506) 394-3455
>> kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca
>>
>>
>> Ce message est destiné à la personne désignée dans la présente et il doit
>> demeurer confidentiel. Il ne
>> doit pas être réacheminé sans la permission de l’expéditeur. Si ce
>> message
>> vous a été envoyé par
>> erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur et effacer le message. Effacez
>> ensuite
>> votre réponse. Merci de votre
>> collaboration.
>>
>> Veuillez ne pas imprimer ce courriel à moins que ce soit nécessaire.
>>
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Envoyé : 14 octobre 2018 15:12
>> À : David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Cc : michaelc.beck@libertymutual.
>> <mgill@themortgagespecialists.
>> Boston.Mail <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>; washington field
>> <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; ray@paulickreport.com;
>> presidentialsvcteam@
>> Gilles.Blinn <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
>> fin.financepublic-
>> <Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>> clare.barry <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>; daniel.gosselin
>> <daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.
>> hon.ralph.goodale <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>; Jody.Wilson-Raybould
>> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>> <andre@jafaust.com>; jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>; Rousselle, Serge
>> (LEG) <Serge.Rousselle@gnb.ca>; Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)
>> <Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>; andrew.scheer <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>;
>> maxime.bernier <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>; Gerald.Butts
>> <Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca; Norman.Sabourin
>> <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
>> <Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca>; Coon, David (LEG) <David.Coon@gnb.ca>; Gauvin,
>> Robert (LEG) <Robert.Gauvin@gnb.ca>; Mitton, Megan (LEG) <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>;
>> Arseneau, Kevin (DSF-NE) <kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca>; Austin, Kris (LEG)
>> <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>; Frank.McKenna <Frank.McKenna@td.com>; oldmaison
>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>; Robert.E.Lighthizer
>> <Robert.E.Lighthizer@ustr.eop.
>> David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.
>> <PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
>> news <news@kingscorecord.com>; news <news@dailygleaner.com>; news919
>> <news919@rogers.com>; news <news@dailymail.co.uk>; Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>; darrow.macintyre <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
>> Objet : Re: Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the Yankee
>> Mid Term Elections that your fellow lawyer Franky Boy McKenna and many
>> other Maritmers may enjoy N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
>>
>> https://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 14 October 2018
>> Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the Yankee Mid Term
>> Elections that your fellow lawyer Franky Boy McKenna and many other
>> Maritmers may enjoy N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
>>
>>
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 18:58:24 -0400
Subject: Do you understand what you bounced back to me?
To: "Arseneau, Kevin (DSF-NE)"<kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
"michaelc.beck@libertymutual.
"mdcohen212@gmail.com"<mdcohen212@gmail.com>, mgill
<mgill@themortgagespecialists.
"Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "ray@paulickreport.com"
<ray@paulickreport.com>, "presidentialsvcteam@
<presidentialsvcteam@
<skywatcher007@msn.com>, "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"fin.financepublic-
<fin.financepublic-
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>,
"daniel.gosselin"<daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "Rousselle,
Serge (LEG)"<Serge.Rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Gallant, Premier Brian
(PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca"
<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
DAAF/MAAP)"<Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca>, "Coon, David (LEG)"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Gauvin, Robert (LEG)"<Robert.Gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>, "Austin, Kris (LEG)"
<Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Robert.E.Lighthizer"
<Robert.E.Lighthizer@ustr.eop.
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
stateofcorruptionnh1 <stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
<news@dailygleaner.com>, news919 <news919@rogers.com>, news
<news@dailymail.co.uk>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: "Arseneau, Kevin (DSF-NE)"<kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 22:30:52 +0000
Subject: RE: Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the
Yankee Mid Term Elections that your fellow lawyer Franky Boy McKenna
and many other Maritmers may enjoy N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, David Amos
<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Cc: "michaelc.beck@libertymutual.
<michaelc.beck@libertymutual.
<mdcohen212@gmail.com>, mgill <mgill@themortgagespecialists.
Maggie <Maggie@maggiehassan.com>, "Boston.Mail"
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "ray@paulickreport.com"
<ray@paulickreport.com>, "presidentialsvcteam@
<presidentialsvcteam@
<skywatcher007@msn.com>, "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"fin.financepublic-
<fin.financepublic-
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>,
"daniel.gosselin"<daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"
<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>, "Rousselle,
Serge (LEG)"<Serge.Rousselle@gnb.ca>, "Gallant, Premier Brian
(PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>, "andrew.scheer"
<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>, "Gerald.Butts"
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca"
<andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca>
<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
DAAF/MAAP)"<Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca>, "Coon, David (LEG)"
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Gauvin, Robert (LEG)"<Robert.Gauvin@gnb.ca>,
"Mitton, Megan (LEG)"<Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>, "Austin, Kris (LEG)"
<Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Robert.E.Lighthizer"
<Robert.E.Lighthizer@ustr.eop.
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
stateofcorruptionnh1 <stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
<news@dailygleaner.com>, news919 <news919@rogers.com>, news
<news@dailymail.co.uk>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>, "Arseneau, Kevin (LEG)"
<Kevin.A.Arseneau@gnb.ca>
J'ai reçu ce courriel par erreur
Merci et bonne journée!
Kevin,
Responsable des installations scolaire
District scolaire francophone nord-est
Téléphone : (506) 394-3407
Télécopieur : (506) 394-3455
kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca
Ce message est destiné à la personne désignée dans la présente et il
doit demeurer confidentiel. Il ne
doit pas être réacheminé sans la permission de l’expéditeur. Si ce
message vous a été envoyé par
erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur et effacer le message. Effacez
ensuite votre réponse. Merci de votre
collaboration.
Veuillez ne pas imprimer ce courriel à moins que ce soit nécessaire.
-----Message d'origine-----
De : David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Envoyé : 14 octobre 2018 15:12
À : David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Cc : michaelc.beck@libertymutual.
<mgill@themortgagespecialists.
Boston.Mail <Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>; washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>; ray@paulickreport.com;
presidentialsvcteam@
Gilles.Blinn <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>;
fin.financepublic-
<Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
clare.barry <clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>; daniel.gosselin
<daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.
hon.ralph.goodale <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>; Jody.Wilson-Raybould
<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<andre@jafaust.com>; jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>; Rousselle, Serge
(LEG) <Serge.Rousselle@gnb.ca>; Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)
<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>; andrew.scheer <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>;
maxime.bernier <maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>; Gerald.Butts
<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>; andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca;
Norman.Sabourin <Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
(ERD/DER - DAAF/MAAP) <Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca>; Coon, David (LEG)
<David.Coon@gnb.ca>; Gauvin, Robert (LEG) <Robert.Gauvin@gnb.ca>;
Mitton, Megan (LEG) <Megan.Mitton@gnb.ca>; Arseneau, Kevin (DSF-NE)
<kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca>; Austin, Kris (LEG) <Kris.Austin@gnb.ca>;
Frank.McKenna <Frank.McKenna@td.com>; oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>;
Robert.E.Lighthizer <Robert.E.Lighthizer@ustr.eop.
<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>; David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
stateofcorruptionnh1 <stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.
<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.
<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>; news <news@kingscorecord.com>; news
<news@dailygleaner.com>; news919 <news919@rogers.com>; news
<news@dailymail.co.uk>; Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>;
darrow.macintyre <darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
Objet : Re: Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the
Yankee Mid Term Elections that your fellow lawyer Franky Boy McKenna
and many other Maritmers may enjoy N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
https://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 14 October 2018
Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the Yankee Mid
Term Elections that your fellow lawyer Franky Boy McKenna and many
other Maritmers may enjoy N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 14:12:11 -0400
Subject: Re: Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the Yankee Mid Term Elections
that your fellow lawyer Franky Boy McKenna and many other Maritmers may enjoy
N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Cc: michaelc.beck@libertymutual.
mgill <mgill@themortgagespecialists.
"Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ray@paulickreport.com, "presidentialsvcteam@
<presidentialsvcteam@
"Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, fin.financepublic-
"daniel.gosselin"<daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>,
"maxime.bernier"<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca,
"Norman.Sabourin"<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
"rick.doucet"<rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca,
"kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
"Robert.E.Lighthizer"<Robert.E.Lighthizer@ustr.eop.
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
https://davidraymondamos3.
Sunday, 14 October 2018
Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the Yankee Mid
Term Elections that your fellow lawyer Franky Boy McKenna and many
other Maritmers may enjoy N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 13:23:48 -0400
Subject: Here is a Tale of Horse Racing and 3 Lawsuits before the Yankee Mid Term Elections
that your fellow lawyer Franky Boy McKenna and many other Maritmers may enjoy
N'esy Pas Petey Baby MacKay?
To: michaelc.beck@libertymutual.
mgill <mgill@themortgagespecialists.
"Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ray@paulickreport.com, "presidentialsvcteam@
<presidentialsvcteam@
"Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, fin.financepublic-
"daniel.gosselin"<daniel.gosselin@cas-satj.gc.
mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
"Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch <jbosnitch@gmail.com>,
"maxime.bernier"<maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>,
"Gerald.Butts"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, andrew.baumberg@fct-cf.gc.ca,
"Norman.Sabourin"<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca
"rick.doucet"<rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, kevin.arseneau@gnb.ca,
"kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Frank.McKenna"<Frank.McKenna@td.com>,
oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
"Robert.E.Lighthizer"<Robert.E.Lighthizer@ustr.eop.
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Trust that if Google blocks this email i will send it byway of another
email account and blog it for good measure then forward many people
the link to it
Message blocked |
Your message to mcu@justice.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. |
Your
message to Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. |
Your message to PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com has been blocked. See technical details below for more information. |
First the there is the Stronach Family Feudhttp://davidraymondamos3. Thursday, 9 August 2018 Why does CBC care what Petey Baby MacKay thinks about anything? https://twitter.com/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "MacKay, Peter"<Peter.MacKay@bakermckenzie. Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 14:39:17 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: YO Minister Jean-Yves.Duclos Once again you are welcome Now how about the RCMP, the LIEbranos and all the other parliamentarians start acting with some semblance of Integrity after all these years? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for your email. I am currently out of the office attending meetings and have limited access to email and voicemail. If your matter is urgent, or if you require assistance, please contact my assistant, Nicole Bruni at nicole.bruni@bakermckenzie.com or at (416) 865-3861. This message may contain confidential and privileged information. If it has been sent to you in error, please reply to advise the sender of the error and then immediately delete this message. Please visit www.bakermckenzie.com/ concerning this message. Do tell does Petey Baby MacKay or anyone else remember what went down between Don Amos his old girlfriend Belinda's lawyer and I in early 2005? https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/frank-belinda-stronach-lawsuit-1.4858150 Frank Stronach sues daughter Belinda for allegedly mismanaging family fortuneLawsuit in Ontario Superior Court seeks more than $500M in damages![]() An
Ontario business magnate is suing his daughter, two grandchildren and
others for allegedly mismanaging the family's assets and trust funds. Frank Stronach, the man who started the auto-parts business Magna International, and his wife Elfriede have launched the lawsuit in Ontario Superior Court and say they have done so as a last resort. Stronach says in a statement that the couple has made "considerable efforts" over the last two years to resolve the matter. Thoroughbred Daily News reports the couple have accused Belinda Stronach, the chairman and president of The Stronach Group that runs horse racetracks around the world, of conspiring by "unlawful actions" against the best interests of other members of the Stronach family. The suit, which has not been proven in court, seeks more than $500 million in damages. 'His allegations are untrue'Belinda Stronach has denied the allegations. "Family relationships within a business can be challenging," she said in a statement Wednesday night. "My children and I love my father. However, his allegations are untrue and we will be responding formally to the statement of claim in the normal course of the court process." A spokesperson for The Stronach Group CEO Alon Ossip, who is also named in the suit, called the allegations "baseless and are not grounded in fact or reality." "Alon has always honoured his obligations and acted in good faith to preserve and grow the Stronach family's assets and to protect the interests of all members of the family," Paul Deegan said in a statement. "This is a dispute between Stronach family members that should be resolved between family members." Then there are the legions of Yankees who love to race and gamble over what happens in the races at the Stonach racetracks I bet many Yankees recall the email found below with the Subject line "Whereas Michael C Beck of Liberty Mutual and others want to know what I know about Horse Racing perhaps you Yankees should ask your lawyers or the Wannabe Governor Mike Gill or follow my Twitter account" N'esy Pas? https://www.paulickreport.com/news/people/fix-beginning-former-leading-owner-gill-ordered-pay-record-274-5m-defamation-suit/ ‘It Was A Fix From The Beginning’: Former Leading Owner Gill Ordered To Pay Record $274.5M In Defamation Suitby Paulick Report Staff | 10.05.2017 | 11:28am Eclipse Award-winning owner Michael Gill, who is no longer involved in the horse racing industry, has once again made headlines after a New Hampshire jury awarded three Manchester, N.H., businessmen a whopping $274.5 million in a defamation suit they had filed against him. According to a report in the New Hampshire Union Leader, the three men, AutoFair owner Andy Crews, Manchester developer Dick Anagnost and Primary Bank founder William Greiner, filed the lawsuit against Gill after he used electronic billboards, radio ads and social media to accuse them of committing crimes, such as dealing drugs and money laundering. The plaintiffs' attorney, Steve Gordon, told the Union Leader that he believes the $274.5 million verdict is the largest personal injury verdict in the state's history. As to how much of that amount the three men will actually receive from Gill remains to be seen. “The chances are my clients will see some of it. How much he has? I do not know,” Gordon said. “In 2015, he claimed he was the largest mortgage broker in the country. The energy we put into trying the case, we will double that energy into collection. And we put a lot of effort into trying this case.” Gill is the founder of The Mortgage Specialists, a large mortgage brokerage firm. Gill represented himself at the week-long trial, but left before a jury was picked. He called the proceeding a “criminal enterprise.” After the verdict was announced, Gill took to social media, posting a statement on his ‘State of Corruption NH' Facebook page in which he said, “I know that there is massive corruption in all of our states. My purpose was to expose NH giving you the absolute evidence of the depth of corruption and to use NH as a domino to expose corruption in every state.” “I have exposed politicians, judges and law enforcement with absolute evidence and witnesses,” Gill went on. “I am not at that trial, it was a fix from the beginning.” Read more in the New Hampshire Union Leader Publisher – Ray Paulick Telephone – 859-312-2102 Now feel free to check my work ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dale Morgan <dale.morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 10:48:34 -0400 Subject: Re: Attn Minister Ralph Goodale RE your two questions of me today Well My Survey Says that you and your RCMP minions are monumental Bullshitters N'esy Pas? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> I am AOD but on my cell if you need me. (506)435-4598. http://davidraymondamos3. Saturday, 8 September 2018 The RCMP and Stephen McGrath the Deputy Minister of Justice of Nova Scotia Should never forget their invitation to sue them N'esy Pas Gilles Moreau? ---------- Original message ---------- From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 13:11:20 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: The RCMP and Stephen McGrath the Deputy Minister of Justice of Nova Scotia should never forget their invitation to sue them N'esy Pas Gilles Moreau"? To: motomaniac333@gmail.com Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member of Parliament for Vancouver Granville. This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email. Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed. To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code. Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write directly to the Department of Justice at mcu@justice.gc.camcu@justice. > or call 613-957-4222. Thank you ------------------- Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de Vancouver Granville. Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement. Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement, veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet, votre adresse et votre code postal. Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ? mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222. Merci Perhaps your lawyers will read my brief now? Here is the first part https://www.scribd.com/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Jensen, Jan" Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 10:04:38 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Trust that I will sue the RCMP but methinks one of Trump's many lawyers should be clever enough call the FBI dudes in DC and Beantown ASAP EH? To: David Amos I will be away from the office and not returning until June 26, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461. https://www.cbc.ca/news/ RCMP faces $1.1B lawsuit over bullying, harassment claims dating back decades Potential class action could represent thousands of officers, civilian employees, students and volunteers Rachel Houlihan, Dave Seglins · CBC News · Posted: Jun 25, 2018 4:00 AM ET ---------- Original message ---------- From: Ralph Goodale <info@email.liberal.ca> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:08:34 +0000 Subject: Two questions To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Liberal Party of Canada ----------------------------- Friend, I've spent a lifetime listening to Canadians. I've considered it my duty since 1974, when I was first elected as an MP. I've always valued when Canadians have come to me with an idea or issue, whether it affects them personally, or touches the entire country. When people speak up, they can help ignite real, positive change. So I listen closely. In 2015, Canadians told us we needed to grow the middle class, and to build an inclusive Canada where everybody has a real and fair chance at success. People spoke up about the high costs of raising a family. Now, more than 300,000 Canadian children have been lifted out of poverty thanks to the Canada Child Benefit - with 9 out of 10 families getting more money to help with the costs of raising kids. Canadians told us that they expect their government to get our natural resources to market - and to do so while protecting the environment and meeting our obligations to Indigenous peoples. We're getting that hard work done. This is the kind of progress we're making together - and I know there's more work to do. That's why I'm calling on you. This week, my colleagues and I will be heading to our Summer Caucus Retreat in Saskatchewan where we'll discuss our plans for this fall and for the year ahead. I want to make sure that your input stays at the heart of everything we do. The Liberal team has launched our Forward to 2019 fall priorities survey to give you the opportunity to share what matters to you. Will you take this two-question survey to give important feedback to the Liberal team about your priorities for the hope and hard work ahead of us? Take the Survey ➜ https://go.liberal.ca/page/s/ I'm looking forward to hearing what you have to say. Sincerely, Ralph Goodale M.P., Regina一Wascana. ----------------------------- This email was sent to motomaniac333@gmail.com http://go.liberal.ca/page/ 350 Albert Street, Suite 920 Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 6M8, CA. Authorized by the Federal Liberal Agency of Canada, registered agent for the Liberal Party of Canada. https://davidraymondamos3. Wednesday, 5 September 2018 ATTN David Duncan Young I just met your nasty little buddy Chris Spencer of SNB tonight Thanks to the Green Meanies from Fat Fred City anyone can view the circus last night in Fundy N'esy Pas Premier Gallant? https://www.youtube.com/watch? http://davidraymondamos3. Sunday, 19 November 2017 Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before The Supreme Court https://decisions.fct-cf.gc. Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Amos v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2017-10-30 Neutral citation 2017 FCA 213 File numbers A-48-16 Date: 20171030 Docket: A-48-16 Citation: 2017 FCA 213 CORAM: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Respondent on the cross-appeal (and formally Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant on the cross-appeal (and formerly Respondent) Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017. Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: THE COURT Date: 20171030 Docket: A-48-16 Citation: 2017 FCA 213 CORAM: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Respondent on the cross-appeal (and formally Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant on the cross-appeal (and formerly Respondent) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT I. Introduction [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos) filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan (Claim at para. 96). [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious, and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the Prothontary’s Order). [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr. Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr. Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment). [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016. As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s cross-appeal. II. Preliminary Matter [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal. This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with several judges but did not name those judges. [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7: 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal. […] 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale. […] 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court. 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour fédérale. [7] However, these subsections only provide that the judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this section. [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that: 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale. 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale. [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that appeal book. [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a conflict in any matter related to him. [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court. [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that such judge had a conflict. [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr. Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he was a member of such firm. [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb, focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada over 10 years ago. [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer. [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable apprehension of bias: 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the reasonable apprehension of bias: … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly." [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v. Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R. (4th) 193). [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v. Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict: 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement, as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified. 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances." 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.), for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge. His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19. 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept, that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85: To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making, or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making. 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with his former firm for a considerable period of time. 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage. In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving events from over a decade ago. (emphasis added) [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice Webb hearing this appeal. [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R. (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm. [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4 F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr. Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law. [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD. He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy. [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him to recuse himself. [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself. [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr. Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time, both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry, begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr. Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. III. Issue [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action? IV. Analysis A. Standard of Review [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215, 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at paras. 82-83). [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to interfere. B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the Prothonotary’s Order? [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend: 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006 in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court. (…) 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance. A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he suspects he is barred from the House of Commons. [footnotes omitted]. [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at para. 27). [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada, 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111: [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office: a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct in his or her capacity as public officer; b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly. Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28 (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28). [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in public office because the actors, who barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29). [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321 D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt: …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”. “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald, conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse of process… To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.” (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted). [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered absent a legal or palpable and overriding error. [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons, these allegations are not particularized and are directed against non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such, the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action. [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend. The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26). V. Conclusion [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment, dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety without leave to amend. "Wyman W. Webb" J.A. "David G. Near" J.A. "Mary J.L. Gleason" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15. DOCKET: A-48-16 STYLE OF CAUSE: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Fredericton, New Brunswick DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2017 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. DATED: October 30, 2017 APPEARANCES: David Raymond Amos For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal (on his own behalf) Jan Jensen For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marc Richard <MRichard@lawsociety-barreau. Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 17:43:27 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Oh My My we just talked briefly Correct Ms Beaulieu? It appears to me that the latest President of the NB Law Society thinks non lawyers are not worth talking to To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> I will be out of the office until July 21, 2014. Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 21 juillet 2014. > > Does Ricky Baby Doucet or anyone else recall this email??? > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Doucet, Rick (LEG)"<Rick.Doucet@gnb.ca> > Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2014 01:07:58 +0000 > Subject: RE: Final Docs > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Will get right on this. > Always look forward to your brilliant thoughts. > R > > > Hon.Rick Doucet > Legislative member for Charlotte-the isles > 28 Mt.Pleasant Rd. > St.George, N.B. E5C 3K4 > > Phone / Téléphone : 506-755-4200 > Fax / Télécopieur : 506-755-4207 > E-mail / Courriel : rick.doucet@gnb.ca > > This message is intended for the person to whom it is addressed and is > to be treated as confidential or private communications. It must not > be forwarded unless permission has been received from the originator. > If you have received this message inadvertently, please notify the > sender and delete the message. Then delete your response. Thank you > for your cooperation. > ------------------------------ > Ce message est destiné à la personne désignée dans la présente et il > doit demeurer confidentiel. Il ne doit pas être réacheminé sans la > permission de l’expéditeur. Si ce message vous a été envoyé par > erreur, veuillez aviser l’expéditeur et effacer le message. Effacez > ensuite votre réponse. Merci de votre collaboration. > ______________________________ > https://davidraymondamos3. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Kulik, John"<john.kulik@mcinnescooper.com> Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 18:29:07 +0000 Subject: McInnes Cooper To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>, "david.raymond.amos@gmail.com"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Dear Mr. Amos: I have tried to call you back a number of times at 902-800-0369 but each time I get a busy signal. John Kulik [McInnes Cooper]<http://www. John Kulik Q.C. Partner & General Counsel McInnes Cooper tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350 1969 Upper Water Street Suite 1300 Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1 asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215 From: Kulik, John Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 2:38 PM To: 'motomaniac333@gmail.com'; 'david.raymond.amos@gmail.com' Subject: McInnes Cooper Dear Mr. Amos: I am General Counsel for McInnes Cooper. If you need to communicate with our firm, please do so through me. Thank you. John Kulik [McInnes Cooper]<http://www. John Kulik Q.C. Partner & General Counsel McInnes Cooper tel +1 (902) 444 8571 | fax +1 (902) 425 6350 1969 Upper Water Street Suite 1300 Purdy's Wharf Tower II Halifax, NS, B3J 2V1 asst Cathy Ohlhausen | +1 (902) 455 8215 Notice This communication, including any attachments, is confidential and may be protected by solicitor/client privilege. It is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by e-mail or telephone at McInnes Cooper's expense. Avis Les informations contenues dans ce courriel, y compris toute(s) pièce(s) jointe(s), sont confidentielles et peuvent faire l'objet d'un privilège avocat-client. Les informations sont dirigées au(x) destinataire(s) seulement. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur par courriel ou par téléphone, aux frais de McInnes Cooper. > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 > Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > To: coi@gnb.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Good Day Sir > > After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed > to speak to one of your staff for the first time > > Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who > answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt > at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker > Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. > > These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I > suggested that you study closely. > > This is the docket in Federal Court > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. > > These are digital recordings of the last three hearings > > Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ > > January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ > > April 3rd, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. > > > The only hearing thus far > > May 24th, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity > > Date: 20151223 > > Docket: T-1557-15 > > Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 > > PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell > > BETWEEN: > > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS > > Plaintiff > > and > > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN > > Defendant > > ORDER > > (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on > December 14, 2015) > > The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to > the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November > 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim > in its entirety. > > At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a > letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then > capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian > Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, > (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter > he stated: > > As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the > work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. > You are your brother’s keeper. > > Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former > colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to > expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of > people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses > or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to > me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime > Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former > Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of > Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; > former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former > Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff > Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court > of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired > Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted > Police. > > In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my > personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many > potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am > of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I > hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in > Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, > [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding > allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has > requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. > > > AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of > the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There > is no order as to costs. > > “B. Richard Bell” > Judge > > > Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment > already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent > to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. > > I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court > Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the > bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my > lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? > > "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca > Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM > Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in > Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to > submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you > dudes are way past too late > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à > lalanthier@hotmail.com > > Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca > > Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at > lalanthier@hotmail.com > > To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca > > Thank you, > > Merci , > > > http://davidraymondamos3. > > > 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over > five years after he began his bragging: > > January 13, 2015 > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate > > December 8, 2014 > Why Canada Stood Tall! > > Friday, October 3, 2014 > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And > Stupid Justin Trudeau > > Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide > behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. > > When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien > actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign > in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to > the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were > involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were > significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth > of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for > operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” > Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. > The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not > deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a > Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to > redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was > less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But > alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s > then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s > incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, > professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle > Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway > campaign of 2006. > > What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then > Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the > Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, > support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. > > What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling > chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of > less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners > as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a > deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. > > The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have > the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. > That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by > constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is > remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of > non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government > regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this > instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a > limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. > > President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror > attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” > Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, > and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The > initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and > > P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of > the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have > had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical. > Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me. > > Subject: > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 > From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca > To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > > January 30, 2007 > > WITHOUT PREJUDICE > > Mr. David Amos > > Dear Mr. Amos: > > This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, > 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. > > Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have > taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve > Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. > > Sincerely, > > Honourable Michael B. Murphy > Minister of Health > > CM/cb > > > Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: > > Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 > From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, > nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, > motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John. > Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has > forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not > > Dear Mr. Amos, > > Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off > over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I > was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. > > As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position > is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process > testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the > Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these > services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this > instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. > > As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false > imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear > that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada > the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment > and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. > > It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on > December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. > > Sincerely, > > Warren McBeath, Cpl. > GRC Caledonia RCMP > Traffic Services NCO > Ph: (506) 387-2222 > Fax: (506) 387-4622 > E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > > > > Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > Office of the Integrity Commissioner > Edgecombe House, 736 King Street > Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 > tel.: 506-457-7890 > fax: 506-444-5224 > e-mail:coi@gnb.ca > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000 Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> Mr. Amos, We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will not be responding to further emails on this matter. Department of Justice On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: > If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please > Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob > > http://thedavidamosrant. > ilian.html > >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ >> >> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must >> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING???? >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >> >> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the >> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball >> cards? >> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> 6 >> >> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/ >> >> http://www.archive.org/ >> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> >> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >> Senator Arlen Specter >> United States Senate >> Committee on the Judiciary >> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >> Washington, DC 20510 >> >> Dear Mr. Specter: >> >> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >> raised in the attached letter. >> >> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. >> >> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously. >> >> Very truly yours, >> Barry A. Bachrach >> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >> > > > > https://www.tridentdmg.com/ > > Lanny Davis et al > 1700 K Street NW, Suite 825 > Washington, D.C. 20006 > Tel: 202-899-3834 > Email: info@tridentdmg.com > > http://davidraymondamos3. > > Tuesday, 14 February 2017 > > RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I just got > off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why does he lie > to me after all this time??? > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Finance Public / Finance Publique (FIN)" > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:33 +0000 > Subject: RE: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump > I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why > does he lie to me after all this time??? > To: David Amos > > The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic > correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your > comments. > > Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance > électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos > commentaires. > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Póstur FOR > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:41 +0000 > Subject: Re: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump > I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why > does he lie to me after all this time??? > To: David Amos > > Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received > > Kveðja / Best regards > Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "B English (MIN)" > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:29 +0000 > Subject: Automated response from the office of Hon Bill English > To: David Amos > > Thank you for your email to the Prime Minister. > > This is an automated response. > > Please be assured that any matters you raise in your email will be > noted; however, not all messages will receive an individual response. > > Yours sincerely > The Office of the Prime Minister > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: PmInvites > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:50 +0000 > Subject: PM Invites > To: David Amos > > Thank you for your invitation/meeting request to the Prime Minister, > the Hon Malcolm Turnbull MP. > Your invitation will be considered in light of the Prime Minister's > existing commitments. > We will be in touch with you as soon as possible to formally advise > the progress of your invitation/meeting request. > > Yours sincerely > > Prime Minister's Office > > ______________________________ > > IMPORTANT: This message, and any attachments to it, contains information > that is confidential and may also be the subject of legal professional or > other privilege. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you > must not review, copy, disseminate or disclose its contents to any other > party or take action in reliance of any material contained within it. If > you > have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately > by > return email informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of the > message from your computer system. > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Turnbull, Malcolm (MP)" > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:51:35 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President > Donald J. Trump I just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen > (646-853-0114) Why does he lie to me after all this time??? > To: David Amos > > ***Please be advised that this email address is no longer in use*** > > Thank you for taking the time to write to me. Feedback from the people > we represent is always extremely valuable for members of parliament, > and especially valuable to me as Prime Minister. > > However as you can imagine I receive a very large, sometimes > dauntingly large, amount of correspondence and it is important that we > do everything we can to respond to it as quickly and effectively as > possible. > > So to help us best direct your enquiry and respond to it, please > complete this contact form. If you have written a detailed message in > your email, just cut and paste it into the contact form and complete > the details requested. > > If you would like to invite me or Lucy to an event, please forward the > invitation to pminvites@pmc.gov.au. > > If you are a Wentworth constituent, please make us aware of this and > my electorate office team in Edgecliff will be in touch. > > Regards, > > Malcolm Turnbull > Prime Minister > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: David Amos > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:51:14 -0400 > Subject: RE FATCA, NAFTA & TPP etc ATTN President Donald J. Trump I > just got off the phone with your lawyer Mr Cohen (646-853-0114) Why > does he lie to me after all this time??? > To: president , mdcohen212@gmail.com, pm , > Pierre-Luc.Dusseault@parl.gc. > B.English@ministers.govt.nz, Malcolm.Turnbull.MP@aph.gov.au > pminvites@pmc.gov.au, mayt@parliament.uk, press , "Andrew.Bailey" , > fin.financepublic- > "CNN.Viewer.Communications. > Cc: David Amos , elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, "justin.ling@vice.com, > elizabeththompson" , djtjr , "Bill.Morneau" , postur , > stephen.kimber@ukings.ca, "steve.murphy" , "Jacques.Poitras" , > oldmaison , andre > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: Michael Cohen <mcohen@trumporg.com> > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:14 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just > called and left a message for you > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > Effective January 20, 2017, I have accepted the role as personal > counsel to President Donald J. Trump. All future emails should be > directed to mdcohen212@gmail.com and all future calls should be > directed to 646-853-0114. > ______________________________ > This communication is from The Trump Organization or an affiliate > thereof and is not sent on behalf of any other individual or entity. > This email may contain information that is confidential and/or > proprietary. Such information may not be read, disclosed, used, > copied, distributed or disseminated except (1) for use by the intended > recipient or (2) as expressly authorized by the sender. If you have > received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and > promptly notify the sender. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed > to be received, secure or error-free as emails could be intercepted, > corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late, incomplete, contain viruses > or otherwise. The Trump Organization and its affiliates do not > guarantee that all emails will be read and do not accept liability for > any errors or omissions in emails. Any views or opinions presented in > any email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of The Trump Organization or any of its > affiliates.Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an > electronic signature under applicable law. > > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: "Hancox, Rick (FCNB)"<rick.hancox@fcnb.ca> > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:15:22 +0000 > Subject: Automatic reply: RE FATCA ATTN Pierre-Luc.Dusseault I just > called and left a message for you > To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > > G'Day/Bonjour, > > Thanks for your e-mail. I am out of the office until 24 February. If > you need more immediate assistance, please contact France Bouchard at > 506 658-2696. > > Je serai absent du bureau jusqu'au 24 fevrier Durant mon absence, > veuillez contacter France Bouchard au 506 658-2696 pour assistance > immédiate. > > Thanks/Merci Rick > ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 14:19:06 -0400 Subject: Whereas Michael C Beck of Liberty Mutual and others want to know what I know about Horse Racing perhaps you Yankees should ask your lawyers or the Wannabe Governor Mike Gill or follow my Twitter account To: michaelc.beck@libertymutual. <mgill@themortgagespecialists. "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ray@paulickreport.com Cc: "presidentialsvcteam@ <presidentialsvcteam@ <skywatcher007@msn.com>, "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "john.warr"<john.warr@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> https://www.youtube.com/watch? EXCL: GIFT 2 MY VIEWERS TALK WITH DAVID AMOS ON LIBERTY MUTUAL WheepingWillow2 Published on May 6, 2016 5-6-16 M2U02083 902 800 0369 David Raymond Amos Federal Court Case No. T-1557-15 Google David Amos Twitter David Ray Amos https://www.youtube.com/watch? EXCL: DOCUMENT'N LIBERTY MUTUAL' ABUSES/MEDICAL NEGLECT, MAK'N FUN OF MY FRND DAVID AMOS! WheepingWillow2 Published on May 7, 2016 5-6-16 M2U02086 902 800 0369 David Raymond Amos Federal Court Case No. T-1557-15 Google David Amos Twitter David Ray Amos David Raymond Amos @DavidRayAmos 2 hours ago Yo @raypaulick I just called & left you a message about @FBI & bookies @washingtonpost @MichaelGillSr @POTUS ENJOY https://archive.org/details/ Ray Paulick @raypaulick Publisher http://www.paulickreport.com , covering international sport & business of #Thoroughbred #horseracing & breeding Tel: 859 312.2102 ray@paulickreport.com Lexington, Kentucky USA paulickreport.com http://www.bloomberg.com/ David H. Long Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Corporate Headquarters 175 Berkeley Street Boston, Massachusetts 02116 United States Phone: 617-357-9500 On 4/13/16, Carol Roberts <wheepingwillow2@yahoo.com> wrote: > David Amos, > > Since this one may not have gone through, I am re-sending it. Here's your > copy. > > Carol > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----- > From: Carol Roberts <wheepingwillow2@yahoo.com> > To: "presidentsvcteam@ > <presidentsvcteam@ > <michaelc.beck@libertymutual. > <wheepingwillow2@yahoo.com>; T. F. <skywatcher007@msn.com>; > "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:29 AM > Subject: Fw: Anyone in BC remember the corrupt lawyer Stevey Boy Toope or > the very nasty cop Chief Jamie Graham? I do have some fun but trust I am > never Josh anyone > > > To: Michael Beck ET AL, David Long ET AL, Liberty Mutual ET AL, Liberty > Mutual Group ET AL, Liberty Mutual Insurnace ET AL, > From Carol Roberts ET AL > You Beck wanted to talk to someone about me. Here you go assholes, > 902-800-0369. His name is David Amos. He'll be calling you shortly. He's a > self described BULLDOG that DOES NOT let go of the bone! He's anxious to > speak with you about me. > > By: Carol Roberts > woman > 3203 Ridgewood > Street > Owensboro, > Kentucky > 270-922-0936 > TO: David Amos > Dear David, > > Here is their contact information per your request. My case file > number is WC80D-001917 > > Liberty Mutual assholes to whom we discussed on what they are doing and have > done to me. > > Michael C Beck 317-582-1700 Extention 11705 > > Pres/Ceo David Long 800-344-0197 617-357-9500 > Thank you David. > > Carol > > > > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----- > > > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > To: wheepingwillow2@yahoo.com; Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 3:01 PM > Subject: > > > First Name: CAROL > Last Name: ROBERTSUCC1308 > Email: wheepingwillow2@yahoo.com > Phone: 270-922-0936 > Address: 3203 RIDGEWOOD STREET > City: OWENSBORO > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 19:38:30 -0400 > Subject: Re Panama Papers Tis strange that even the lawyer Juergen > Mossack and his partners don't care that I proved that Peter Newbatt > Smith and his media cohorts etc had no Integrity way back in 2004 > N'esy Pas Diane Lebouthillier, Gilles Blinn, Stephane Vaillancourt and > Gilles Moreau? > To: mf@mossfon.com, media@publicintegrity.org, > tips@publicintegrity.org, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre > <andre@jafaust.com>, andrewjdouglas <andrewjdouglas@gmail.com>, > gopublic <gopublic@cbc.ca>, "ed.pilkington" > <ed.pilkington@guardian.co.uk> > "dan.ciraco"<dan.ciraco@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury" > <sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada. > <investigations@cbc.ca>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, whistleblower > <whistleblower@finra.org>, WhistleblowerProtection > <WhistleblowerProtection@ > <Russell.George@tigta.treas. > grapevine <grapevine@grapevine.is>, RBauer@perkinscoie.com, oig > <oig@sec.gov>, "Stephane.vaillancourt" > <Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp- > <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> > Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> > <Diane.Lebouthillier@cra-arc. > <Diane.Lebouthillier.a1@parl. > <Andrew.Treusch@cra-arc.gc.ca> > <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, > "mark.vespucci"<mark.vespucci@ci.irs.gov>, gryle@icij.org, > mhudson@publicintegrity.org, "Gilles.Moreau" > <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> > > http://www.cbc.ca/news/ > > CRA's pursuit of Panama Papers tips likely to take years > Revenue Minister Lebouthiller promises Panama Papers followup, but > previous tax-haven audits slow > > By Dean Beeby, CBC News Posted: Apr 05, 2016 4:59 PM ET > > https://panamapapers.icij.org/ > > https://www.publicintegrity. > > On 4/8/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: >> http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/ >> >> Panama Papers' firm co-founder: We didn't know >> Everett Rosenfeld | @Ev_Rosenfeld >> 2 Hours AgoCNBC.com >> >> http://www.mossfon.com/ >> >> Jurgen Mossack >> Mossack Fonseca & Co >> Mossfon Building >> 54th Street, Marbella >> Panama 0832-0886 >> Tel: (507) 205-5888 Ext. 395 >> Fax: +507 265 7345 >> Email: mf@mossfon.com >> >> FYI I am This David Amos but these are not my blogs >> >> http://qslspolitics.blogspot. >> >> http://qslspolitics.blogspot. >> >> http://thedavidamosrant. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400 >> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy >> To: randyedmunds <randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca> >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> >> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry >> affect the interests of every person in every district of every >> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with >> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and >> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record. >> >> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of >> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the >> Conservatives >> >> >> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the >> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments >> >> Here is why >> >> http://www.banking.senate.gov/ >> >> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate >> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice >> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the >> following file >> >> http://www.checktheevidence. >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:33:57 -0400 >> Subject: Fwd: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to >> my complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to >> talk a lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings >> held on Dec 14th and Jan 11th >> To: janice.leahy@gnb.ca, Kim.MacPherson@gnb.ca >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> >> KIM MACPHERSON CA >> Auditor General >> Phone : (506) 453-2465 >> Fax : (506) 453-3067 >> Email : Kim.MacPherson@gnb.ca >> >> >> JANICE LEAHY CA, CIA >> Deputy Auditor General of New Brunswick >> HSBC Place >> 520 King Street >> Fredericton, New Brunswick >> E3B 6G3 >> >> Phone : (506) 453-6751 >> Fax : (506) 453-3067 >> Email : janice.leahy@gnb.ca >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 16:29:14 -0400 >> Subject: Re Federal Court Rule 46 (1) (a) (viii) as it applies to my >> complaint (File No: T-1557-15) Trust that I called and tried to talk a >> lot bureaucrats and politicians etc before sharing the hearings held >> on Dec 14th and Jan 11th >> To: Rheal.Fortin.c1@parl.gc.ca, Murray.Rankin.c1@parl.gc.ca, >> cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, nbd_cna@liberal.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, >> ljulien@liberal.ca, pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>, bdysart >> <bdysart@smss.com>, bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>, >> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca, robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw. >> jda@nf.aibn.com, eclark@coxandpalmer.com, office@liberal.ns.ca, >> president@lpco.ca, david@lpcm.ca, emerchant >> <emerchant@merchantlaw.com>, info@fja-cmf.gc.ca, w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, >> richard.tardif@cas-satj.gc.ca, "andrew.scheer" >> <andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, john.wallace@sen.parl.gc.ca, MulcaT >> <MulcaT@parl.gc.ca>, "rona.ambrose.A1"<rona.ambrose.A1@parl.gc.ca>, >> RBauer <RBauer@perkinscoie.com>, sshimshak@paulweiss.com, >> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith <msmith@svlaw.com>, bginsberg >> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com>, "gregory.craig" >> <gregory.craig@skadden.com>, "Gilles.Blinn" >> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.paulson" >> <bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bob.rae" >> <bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net >> <Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >> <Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp- >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Chantal.Carbonneau@cas-satj. >> assistance@liberal.ca, Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>, "stephen.harper" >> <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca> >> >> Anyway at least nobody said I could not so enjoy. >> >> Judge Bell Dec 14th >> >> https://archive.org/details/ >> >> Judge Southcott Jan 11th >> >> https://archive.org/details/ >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Elena Churikova <ElenaChurikova@ifac.org> >> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 20:22:31 +0000 >> Subject: RE: The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants and their >> many associates must remember me know correct Kevin Dancey? >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> >> Dear David, >> >> Thank you for forwarding the information to me and taking your time to >> bring these matters to our attention. As discussed I will forward the >> information to the appropriate person who will process it in >> accordance with our company's policy. >> >> With kind regards, >> >> Elena >> >> Elena Churikova >> Manager, Governance >> International Federation of Accountants >> 529 Fifth Avenue >> New York, NY 10017 USA >> >> Direct: +1 (212) 471-8730 >> Main: +1 (212) 286-9344 >> Mobile: +1 (917) 587-3854 >> Fax: +1 (212) 286-9570 >> >> Learn more at: ifac.org >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail. >> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 4:17 PM >> To: Elena Churikova >> Cc: David Amos >> Subject: Fwd: The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants and >> their many associates must remember me know correct Kevin Dancey? >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:10:40 -0400 >> Subject: The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants and their >> many associates must remember me know correct Kevin Dancey? >> To: office@cga-ns.org, info@cpacanada.ca, chait@bcsc.bc.ca, >> lara.gaede@asc.ca, cmcinnis@osc.gov.on.ca, >> anctil-bavas@lautorite.qc.ca, Communications@ifac.org, info@cairp.ca, >> gmoore@icans.ns.ca >> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> tobin.lambie@cica.ca, kevin.dancey@cica.ca, heather.whyte@cica.ca, >> Hwhyte@cpacanada.ca, Kdancey@cpacanada.ca >> >> http://archive.newswire.ca/en/ >> >> >> >> October 16, 2007 4:04 PM >> - General >> - Media Advisories >> >> Media Advisory - Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Media >> Availability >> >> >> TORONTO, Oct. 16 /CNW/ - Kevin Dancey, President and CEO of the >> Canadian >> Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), will be available for phone >> interviews with the media following tonight's federal Throne Speech. >> Any media outlet wanting to book an interview can contact Tobin >> Lambie, >> Manager, Media, at 416-204-3228 or tobin.lambie@cica.ca >> >> For further information: Chartered Accountants of Canada, 277 Wellington >> Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5V 3H2, Tel: (416) 977-3222, Fax: >> (416) 977-8585, www.cica.ca >> >> http://stop-ca-cma-cga-merger. >> >> >> >> https://www.cpacanada.ca/en/ >> >> https://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ >> >> Kevin Dancey >> Canadian Institute-Chartered >> 277 Wellington St W, >> Toronto, ON, M5V 3E4 >> Telephone 416-977-3222 >> >> https://www.cpacanada.ca/en/ >> >> CBA/CPA Canada Joint Committee on Taxation: Guidance on federal income >> tax issues >> >> Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada) collaborates >> with the Canadian Bar Association (CBA) to offer the federal >> government input on tax laws through its Joint Committee on Taxation. >> Close-up of a businesswoman writing at a meeting table. Other business >> people are seen in the background. >> >> A long-standing collaboration of CPA Canada and the Canadian Bar >> Association, this committee is a knowledge resource that enables CPA >> Canada to provide the Department of Finance and Canada Revenue Agency >> with expert insights on the technical aspects of present and proposed >> federal income tax laws. Its members respond to income tax legislation >> developments, make recommendations to the federal government to >> resolve income tax matters and provide expert counsel on income tax >> policy to other CPA Canada committees. >> Members >> >> Mitchell Sherman (chair) >> Goodmans LLP >> Toronto >> >> Janice Russell, CPA, CA (co-chair) >> Deloitte LLP >> Toronto >> >> Siobhan Monaghan (vice chair) >> Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP >> Toronto >> >> Kim Moody, FCA (vice chair) >> Moodys LLP Tax Advisors >> Calgary >> >> Bruce Ball, FCPA, FCA >> BDO Canada LLP >> Toronto >> >> Corrado Cardarelli >> Torys LLP >> Toronto >> >> Larry Chapman, FCPA, FCA >> Non-voting ex-officio >> Canadian Tax Foundation >> Toronto >> >> Gabe Hayos, FCPA, FCA >> Non-voting ex-officio >> Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada >> Toronto >> >> Kenneth Griffin, CPA, CA >> PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP >> Toronto >> >> Michael McLaren >> Thorsteinssons >> Vancouver >> >> Darcy Moch >> Bennett Jones LLP >> Calgary >> >> Colin Mowatt, CPA, CA >> PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP >> Toronto >> >> Angelo Nikolakakis >> Couzin Taylor LLP >> Montreal >> >> Joel Nitikman >> Fraser Milner Casgrain LLP >> Vancouver >> >> Edward Rowe >> Osler Hoskin & Harcourt >> Calgary >> >> Lorne Shillinger, CPA, CA >> KPMG LLP >> Toronto >> >> Sandra Slaats >> Deloitte LLP >> Toronto >> >> Anthony Strawson, CMA >> Felesky Flynn LLP >> Calgary >> >> Glen Thompson, CA >> MNP LLP >> Edmonton >> >> Jeffrey Trossman >> Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP >> Toronto >> >> Tim Wach >> Gowlings Lafleur Henderson LLP >> Toronto >> >> Craig Webster, CA >> Borden Lander Gervais LLP >> Toronto >> >> Penny Woolford, CPA, CA >> KPMG LLP >> Toronto >> >> Eric Xiao, CPA, CA >> Ernst & Young >> Toronto >> >> Karen Yull, CPA, CA >> Grant Thornton LLP >> >> >> http://www.ctf.ca/ctfweb/EN/ >> >> Toronto office: >> >> >> Québec office: >> >> Canadian Tax Foundation >> 595 Bay Street >> Suite 1200 >> Toronto, Ontario >> M5G 2N5 >> Tel: 416-599-0283 >> >> Fondation canadienne de fiscalité >> 1250 boul. René-Lévesque ouest >> Bureau 2935 >> Montreal, Québec >> H3B 4W8 >> Tél: (514)939-6323 >> >> About the Canadian Tax Foundation: >> >> Founded in 1945 as an independent tax research organization under the >> joint sponsorship of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants >> and the Canadian Bar Association, the Foundation provides a unique >> forum for lawyers, accountants, academics and other tax professionals >> to work together for the betterment of the Canadian tax system and the >> tax profession in general. >> >> For our 10,000 plus members, the Foundation is a valuable resource for >> the scope and depth of the tax information it provides and for its >> services to members, which support their everyday work in the taxation >> field. >> >> The Foundation has long been respected by Government policy makers and >> administrators for its objectivity, its focus on current tax issues, >> its concern for improvement of the Canadian tax system, and its >> significant contribution to tax and fiscal >> >> >> Governance >> >> The activities of the Foundation are directed by a board of 34 >> governors, nominated in consultation with its founding bodies, the >> Canadian Bar Association and the Chartered Professional Accountants of >> Canada. Governors are elected for a one-year term by the members >> present at the annual general meeting and generally serve for 3 years. >> The elected board represents all regions of Canada, the accounting and >> legal professions, and other tax-focused disciplines, and reflects >> diversity of specialization and of business organization. The board >> carries out its work through an executive committee (which includes >> the Foundation's full-time Executive Director) and several other >> working committees concerned with research, conferences and other >> events, membership, finances and government and community relations. A >> nominating committee in consultation with the Foundation's director >> prepares the slate for the election of a new board each year. >> >> >> Kevin Dancey >> Job Title: IFAC Board Technical Advisor for Carol Bellringer >> Country: Canada >> >> Kevin Dancey is the technical advisor for IFAC Board member Carol >> Bellringer. He was previously a member of the IFAC Board, 2006-2012. >> >> Mr. Dancey is president and chief executive officer of CPA Canada, >> appointed in January 2013 after previous serving as president of the >> Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA), a position he >> assumed in 2006. Prior to this, he was the CEO and senior partner of >> PwC in Canada and a member of the PricewaterhouseCoopers Global >> Leadership Team. Prior to election to this position he served as >> leader of PwC’s Canadian Tax Services Group. From 1993 to 1995, he >> served as assistant deputy minister of the Tax Policy Branch of the >> Canadian Department of Finance. He also served as special advisor to >> the assistant deputy minister of the Tax Policy Branch of the Canadian >> Department of Finance from 1985 to 1987. In addition, he worked with >> the Joint Committee on Taxation of the Canadian Bar Association and >> CICA. >> >> Mr. Dancey graduated from McMaster University with an honors degree in >> Math and Economics. He is a Chartered Accountant and in 2000 received >> the FCA designation. >> . >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch? >> >> https://www.youtube.com/user/ >> >> >> http://thedavidamosrant. >> >> Just Dave >> By Location Visit Detail >> Visit 15,578 >> Domain Name (Unknown) >> IP Address 198.235.184.# (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) >> ISP Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants >> Location Continent : North America >> Country : Canada (Facts) >> State/Region : Ontario >> City : Toronto >> Lat/Long : 43.6667, -79.4167 (Map) >> Language English (U.S.) en-us >> Operating System Microsoft WinXP >> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; >> .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) >> Javascript version 1.3 >> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 800 >> Color Depth : 32 bits >> Time of Visit Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am >> Last Page View Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am >> Visit Length 0 seconds >> Page Views 1 >> Referring URL http://www.bing.com/...avid amos&FORM=LENIE >> Search Engine bing.com >> Search Words david amos >> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/ >> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/ >> Out Click >> Time Zone UTC-5:00 >> Visitor's Time Nov 25 2011 10:41:25 am >> Visit Number 15,578 >> >> https://www.securities- >> >> Carla-Marie Hait >> Chief Accountant >> British Columbia Securities Commission >> (604) 899-6726 >> chait@bcsc.bc.ca >> >> Lara Gaede >> Chief Accountant >> Alberta Securities Commission >> (403) 297-4223 >> lara.gaede@asc.ca >> >> Cameron McInnis >> Chief Accountant >> Ontario Securities Commission >> (416) 593-3675 >> cmcinnis@osc.gov.on.ca >> >> Sylvie Anctil-Bavas >> Chef comptable >> Autorité des marchés financiers >> (514) 395-0337 ext. 4291 >> sylvie.anctil-bavas@lautorite. >> >> http://www.cga-canada.org/en- >> >> UNIFICATION OF THE ACCOUNTING PROFESSION >> CGA-Canada united with the Chartered Professional Accountants of >> Canada (CPA Canada) under the CPA banner on October 1, 2014. >> Unification will enhance the influence, relevance and contribution of >> the Canadian accounting profession here at home and internationally. >> >> >> The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants was incorporated by an >> Act of the Parliament of Canada in 1902.[1] This Act, now known as the >> Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Act, was last amended in >> 1990 to reflect the CICA's current mandate and powers.[2] >> >> Working in collaboration with its provincial member organizations, the >> CICA supports the setting of accounting, auditing and assurance >> standards for business, not-for-profit organizations and government, >> and develops and delivers education programs. It also provides a range >> of member services and professional literature; undertakes research >> and development of intellectual property; issues guidance on risk >> management and governance; and fosters relationships with key >> stakeholders nationally and internationally. >> >> International In an age of globalization, the world of finance is >> becoming increasingly interconnected. That is why Certified General >> Accountants of Canada has been an active participant in the >> international accounting community for the past four decades. >> >> Today, CGA-Canada pursues five themes in its international activities. >> Click on the side tabs to learn more about these activities. >> >> Strategic Alliances >> ACCA and CGA Canada Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) >> CGA-Canada and CPA Australia's Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) >> CGA-Canada and CPA Ireland Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) >> CGA-Canada and OEC de France Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA) >> Certification >> Bermuda >> Caribbean >> China >> Hong Kong and Macau >> Export of Knowledge >> CGAs Help Azerbaijan Modernize Accounting >> Central American Educators Get World Bank Support >> >> >> http://www.cga-canada.org/en- >> >> Nova Scotia / Bermuda >> Note: Bermuda students and members are administered by our association >> in Nova Scotia. >> >> The CGA Association of Nova Scotia Office: >> 1801 Hollis Street, Suite 230 >> Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 3N4 >> Tel: 902.425.4923 >> Fax: 902.425.4983 >> Email: office@cga-ns.org >> >> http://www.reuters.com/ >> >> >> Press Release | Wed Nov 26, 2014 9:56am EST >> Harper Government Solidifies Partnership With Canada's Professional >> Accountants >> * Reuters is not responsible for the content in this press release. >> >> Harper Government Solidifies Partnership With Canada's Professional >> Accountants >> >> New CRA-CPA Framework Agreement will strengthen collaboration on >> priority issues, including red tape reduction, service, and compliance >> >> OTTAWA, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Nov. 26, 2014) - Canada Revenue Agency >> >> The Honourable Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, P.C., Q.C., M.P., Minister of >> National Revenue, today announced the signing of a first-ever >> agreement with Canada's chartered professional accountant community, >> signaling a new era of information and collaboration in improving tax >> administration in Canada and better serving Canada's taxpayers. >> >> The new Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)-Chartered Professional Accountants >> of Canada (CPA Canada) Framework Agreement was formally signed by >> Andrew Treusch, Commissioner of Revenue and Chief Executive Officer of >> the CRA, and Kevin Dancey, President and CEO of the CPA, during the >> Financial Management Institute's Professional Development Week, being >> held in Ottawa from November 25 to 28. The Framework Agreement >> recognizes the important relationship between the CRA and CPA Canada >> in the successful administration of Canada's tax system, and promotes >> regular dialogue between the two organizations on tax-related matters >> of common interest. It will also ensure that input from Canada's >> accounting professionals is considered as the CRA moves forward with >> its change agenda. >> >> A central part of the Framework Agreement includes the creation of >> seven committees, each co-chaired by a senior representative from both >> the CRA and CPA Canada, to focus on seven priority areas: >> >> Services; >> Compliance; >> Tax Administration; >> Scientific Research and Experimental Development; >> Commodity Tax; >> Red Tape Reduction; and >> Training >> >> The agreement is a key element in the CRA's efforts to build strong >> relationships with the Canadian accounting community and tax service >> providers so that Canada continues to have a well-functioning and >> world-class tax system that benefits all Canadians. >> >> Quick Facts >> >> -The Financial Management Institute brings together some 3,500 >> financial management professionals from the private and public sectors >> to stay abreast of evolving practices in the management of public >> resources. >> >> -With the recent merger of all of professional accounting >> associations, CPA Canada now represents more than 190,000 members who >> play an important role in fostering tax compliance in Canada. >> >> -Currently, over 80 percent of Canada's professional accountants are >> merged under the CPA banner. (Source: Chartered Professional >> Accountants of Canada) >> >> -The CRA now offers over 80 service options to tax professionals in >> its dedicated secure online portal, Represent a Client, and that >> number is growing every year. >> >> Quotes >> >> "Our Government is committed to the administration of a world-class >> tax system, and I am pleased that the CRA-CPA Canada Framework >> Agreement formalizes an important partnership. This agreement will >> help a clear path forward on how we will seek improvements to our tax >> system to better serve Canadian taxpayers." >> >> The Honourable Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, P.C., Q.C., M.P., Minister of >> National Revenue >> >> "I am pleased to sign the CRA-CPA Canada Framework Agreement on behalf >> of our more than 190,000 members. This framework ensures that input >> from Canada's accounting professionals is considered by the CRA as it >> continues to modernize its programs and services. Our profession looks >> forward to enhanced collaboration with CRA as we collectively focus on >> a fair and efficient tax system for Canada with the best interests of >> taxpayers the key priority." >> >> Kevin Dancey, President and CEO, Chartered Professional Accountants of >> Canada >> >> "FMI is pleased to host this historical signing at our PD week, the >> largest gathering of public sector financial managers in Canada. This >> event is made possible with the support of our members, our amazing >> volunteers and our long lasting partners such as CPA and CRA just to >> name a few. FMI is proud to be the voice of the government financial >> management community since 1962." >> >> Mathieu Langelier, Chief Executive Officer, Financial Management >> Institute of Canada >> >> Associated Links >> >> Red Tape Reduction (RTR) >> >> Represent a Client >> >> Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA) >> >> Represent a client-what's new >> >> Financial Management Institute >> >> Stay connected >> To receive updates when new information is added to our website, you can: >> >> -Follow the CRA on Twitter - @CanRevAgency. >> >> -Subscribe to a CRA electronic mailing list. >> >> -Add our RSS feeds to your feed reader. >> >> -Watch our tax-related videos on YouTube. >> >> Rebecca Rogers >> Director of Communications >> Office of the Minister of National Revenue >> 613-995-2960 >> >> Noel Carisse >> Media Relations >> Canada Revenue Agency >> 613-952-9184 >> >> >> https://ocl-cal.gc.ca/app/ >> >> Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada (CPA Canada)/Comptables >> professionnels agréés du Canada (CPA Canada) >> Associated registration: 781031-13682-41 >> Communication date: 2015-06-03 >> Posted date: 2015-07-15 >> >> Designated Public Office Holders who participated in the >> communication: Frank Vermaeten, Assistant Commissioner >> Assessment & Benefit Services Branch, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) >> >> Anne Marie Lévesque, Assistant Commissioner >> Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) >> >> Mireille Laroche, Deputy Assistant Commissioner >> Collections and Verification, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) >> >> Rick Stewart, Assistant Commissioner >> Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) >> >> Richard Montroy, Assistant Commissioner >> Compliance Programs Branch, Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) >> >> Ted Gallivan, Deputy Assistant Commissioner >> Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) >> >> Andrew Treusch, Commissioner and Chief Executive Officer >> Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) >> >> Kerry-Lynne Findley, Minister of National Revenue >> Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) >> >> Subject Matter of the communication: Taxation and Finance >> >> Communication Report amended on: 2015-07-15 previous entry: 13682-358143 >> Reason for amendment: Thought a spelling error was made. >> >> Responsible Officer who filed this communication report: Kevin Dancey >> >> >> The above name is that of the most senior paid officer who is >> responsible for filing a return for a corporation or organization (the >> Registrant), whether that person participated in this communication or >> not. Indeed, the Lobbyists Registration Regulations do not require >> that the names of in-house lobbyists (i.e. employees of corporations >> or organizations) who actually participated in this communication with >> a designated public office holder be disclosed. >> >> >> http://www.payroll.ca/CPA/ >> >> https://openparliament.ca/ >> >> >> http://www.cba.org/CBA/ >> >> https://www.ific.ca/wp- >> >> http://stop-ca-cma-cga-merger. >> >> CICA Just Wants Its Members to Feel Like They’ve Been Heard >> >> The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) doesn’t really >> care what its members think of the CA/CMA/CGA merger. It just wants >> them to feel like they’ve been heard. >> >> Look at the e-mail Heather Whyte (VP of Communications and External >> Relations at CICA) accidentally sent to a member when she hit “reply >> all”. It’s better if you read this string of emails from the bottom >> up. >> >> >> From: Heather.Whyte@cica.ca [mailto:Heather.Whyte@cica.ca] >> Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 06:40 AM >> To: Aguilar Ismail, Michelle >> Cc: 'William MacKinnon'<bmackinnon@rogers.com>; >> 'Kevin.Dancey@cica.ca'<Kevin.Dancey@cica.ca>; 'Peter.McLean@cica.ca' >> <Peter.McLean@cica.ca> >> Subject: RE: FW: CA-CMA Merger: Important Message to all CAs >> >> Hi Kevin ... let me take this one. you have more important things to do. >> >> I will call her and calm her by providing clarity on the process and >> feedback, etc. if you like. I think it may be best to let her vent and >> feel heard. >> also i will ask shane to track her email and let us know the status. >> >> H >> >> >> From: "Aguilar Ismail, Michelle"<maismail@suncor.com> >> To: "'Kevin.Dancey@cica.ca'"<Kevin.Dancey@cica.ca> >> Cc: 'William MacKinnon'<bmackinnon@rogers.com>, >> "'Peter.McLean@cica.ca'"<Peter.McLean@cica.ca>, >> "'Heather.Whyte@cica.ca'"<Heather.Whyte@cica.ca> >> Date: 09/08/2011 03:19 PM >> Subject: RE: FW: CA-CMA Merger: Important Message to all CAs >> >> >> I did not receive an e-mail today nor the one on September 5th from >> the CICA. If your sever issues have been solved, why did I not >> receive it nor my husband who is also a CA? >> >> What do you mean by you have not heard from many members? Your first >> paragraph in your today's communication states that you have received >> feedback. There is direct feedback on the blog page you have set up >> and is the feedback being received via e-mail as I have provided and >> other colleagues not being considered? >> >> Please answer my question in #4 - I am sure you will hear from members >> when there is a vote if you are not getting enough feedback now. >> >> >> From: Kevin.Dancey@cica.ca [mailto:Kevin.Dancey@cica.ca] >> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 3:01 PM >> To: Aguilar Ismail, Michelle >> Cc: William MacKinnon; Peter.McLean@cica.ca; Heather.Whyte@cica.ca >> Subject: Re: FW: CA-CMA Merger: Important Message to all CAs >> >> Thank you for your email >> >> The September 5 and 8 emails were sent to all CAs, not a select few. >> We did have server problems on Monday and all CAs may not have >> received the September 5 email. However the September 5 email was >> attached to the email sent out today. Please let us know if you do not >> get the September 8 email >> >> With respect to the feedback received to date we have not heard from >> many members and many have asked for more information; the purpose of >> today's email was to provide additional information so that members >> could be more fully informed on the issues. >> >> Regards >> >> Kevin Dancey >> Kevin J. Dancey, FCA >> President & CEO / Président-directeur général >> The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants / L’Institut Canadien >> des Comptables Agréés >> Tel / Tél. : 416 204.3333 Fax / Téléc. : 416 204.3405 >> e-mail / courriel : kevin.dancey@cica.ca >> The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants >> L’Institut Canadien des Comptables Agréés >> 277 Wellington St. West, Toronto ON M5V 3H2 >> 277, rue Wellington Ouest, Toronto (Ontario) Canada M5V 3H2 >> Tel: 416 977.3222 Fax: 416 977.8585 >> Tél. : 416 977.3222 Téléc. : 416 977.8585 >> www.cica.ca >> www.icca.ca >> >> >> >> From: "Aguilar Ismail, Michelle"<maismail@suncor.com> >> To: "'peter.mclean@cica.ca'"<peter.mclean@cica.ca>, >> "'kevin.dancey@cica.ca'"<kevin.dancey@cica.ca>, >> "'bmackinnon@rogers.com'"<bmackinnon@rogers.com>, >> "'viewpoint@cica.ca'"<viewpoint@cica.ca>, >> "'Member_Viewpoint@icao.on.ca' >> Date: 09/08/2011 02:45 PM >> Subject: FW: CA-CMA Merger: Important Message to all CAs >> >> >> >> >> Dear Nora Murrant, Peter McLean, Kevin Dancey, Bill MacKinnon: >> >> I am writing on several issues that are gravely disturbing to me as a >> CA (ICAO #317839). I have called the CICA and have been advised to >> contact you directly. >> >> 1) I have not received the below e-mail from the CICA nor the ICAO. >> I received this communication through a colleague. Please confirm >> immediately why I am not receiving these communications directly. I >> find the selective distribution extremely unprofessional and a >> disgrace to the record keeping of the CICA as I am currently signed up >> to receive all merger related communication electronically and have >> filled in a survey indicating that I want to receive all merger >> communication via e-mail. This profession demands integrity and >> reliability, yet you cannot even distribute e-mails to your full >> member population. Having spoken to the CICA receptionist, she >> mentioned she is receiving a large volume of calls indicating that >> other CA's are also upset since they are not receiving these >> communications so there are clearly errors with your distribution >> list. Please confirm asap the reason I did not receive the below >> communication. >> >> 2) CMA's have received the attached e-mail on September 5th regarding >> the merger urging them to complete the survey. Again, I am extremely >> upset that I as a CA did not receive this same communication directly >> via e-mail. This is unprofessional. Please confirm why CA's were >> excluded from this same communication in the same format? It appears >> to me as though the CMA's are sending out these direct targeted >> communications that are completely one-sided to encourage them to >> provide positive feedback on the merger so that results can be >> portrayed as being in favour of the merger even though CA's are >> clearly against this merger. The CICA is not sending direct >> communication (or rather to a select sample of CA's) and rather >> posting information on a website without directing them to the >> information which I find personally underhanded. >> >> 3) Kevin/Bill - your note below is extremely disturbing. In the >> first paragraph, you recognize that the feedback during the >> exploratory phase you have received from CA's whom you are to both >> represent is clearly opposed to the merger. Yet, you disagree with >> the body of CAs and proceed to push your views upon the CA's that are >> clearly against this. What is the point of requesting feedback and >> having an exploratory phase to determine if you will proceed with the >> merger when you are completely ignoring the negative feedback and >> pursing ahead anyways? I am appalled that my member fees are being >> put towards individuals that have no regard for the members feedback >> and do not wish to represent them as they want. I have read every >> single piece of information on this merger that is posted on the >> website (Case for Change/Merger Update/Position Paper/etc.), and could >> not disagree more with this merger after reading all of the >> information presented. There is no further education required - the >> only requirement is for you to listen and represent CA's as requested >> which is to oppose this merger. The one-sided approach to this merger >> is truly disheartening and almost unlawful. There is no confusion in >> the marketplace - a CA is a CA and CMA is a CMA and CGA is a CGA - and >> people who need to know understand what those differences are and they >> are not equal. You are 100% diluting the CA brand by proposing this >> merger rather than protecting it. >> >> 4) When is the vote for this merger going to take place? As you >> state below, CA's are clearly against this merger and it will clearly >> be a repeat of 2004 when a merger was proposed and there was a >> resounding "NO" from CA's despite the "YES" from the CMA's. I will >> encourage each and every single CA and their network to vote and I can >> assure you that I have not had one positive vote for this merger from >> the vast number of CA's that I am in contact with. >> >> 5) I attach the feedback I presented to Nora Murrant via e-mail in >> regards to the merger. Please accept this as my formal feedback as >> being 100% against this merger. >> >> To quote Nora Murrant in her attached e-mail "We are exploring the >> merits and feasibility of a merger. As outlined in the position >> paper, we feel that the rationale for change is clear; however, before >> proceeding any further, we are seeking input from our members, >> registered students, governments and other stakeholders. In >> particular, we want to know if members agree or disagree with the >> issues presented in the position paper and any additional critical >> issues that they believe should be considered. Once we secure that >> feedback, we will decide on how to proceed." From the feedback >> received, it should be clear that CA members disagree as you confirm >> in your below communication. Hence, if the CICA/ICAO decide to >> proceed with next steps with merging, this is in direct contradiction >> to the wishes of your members and it is your duty to represent us. >> >> Regards, >> Michelle Aguilar Ismail, CA >> Posted 30th May 2012 >> >> From: Darren WOROSHELO <Darren.Woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc. >> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 23:15:06 -0400 >> Subject: Re: The pdf files hereto attached forever prove that the >> RCMP, the US Treasury Dept, the latest NB AG Teddy Feming and >> Jacqueline Maarse know that Grant Thornton and KPMG were the auditors >> of the Brookline Savings Bank were I reported the fraud in 2003 >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> >> I am currently absent on duty through June 27. I will have my cell >> phone and be checking e-mails daily. Please contact Acting Sergeant >> Jay Grierson in McBride should you need immedaite assistance. >> >> Cheers! >> >> Darren Woroshelo, Sergeant >> Detachment Commander >> Robson Valley Regional RCMP >> Valemount & McBride Detachments >> 1435 5th Avenue >> PO Box 159 >> Valemount, British Columbia >> V0E 2Z0 >> Phone: 250-566-4466 >> FAX: 250-566-9964 >> Cell: 250-566-1136 >> E-Mail: darren.woroshelo@rcmp-grc.gc. >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "Maarse, Jacqueline"<Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com> >> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 21:54:05 +0000 >> Subject: Your call today with Grant Thornton >> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> >> Dear Mr. Amos, >> >> Further to your call with the 2 gentlemen in our Moncton office today, >> we appreciate your interest in Grant Thornton. We ask that you direct >> any correspondence you may wish to send to my attention at the address >> indicated below. We will not be in a position to copy documents from >> your computer and we ask that you do not attend at our offices for >> that purpose. As indicated in the call, communications relating to >> ongoing litigation are dealt with by our General Counsel's Office and >> our partners and staff are not able to engage with you on these >> matters. >> >> Regards, >> Jacqueline Maarse >> >> Jacqueline Maarse | General Counsel >> Grant Thornton LLP >> 12th Floor | 50 Bay Street | Toronto | ON | M5J 2Z8 >> >> E Jacqueline.Maarse@ca.gt.com< >> http://www.grantthornton.ca/ >> >> [cid:image001.jpg@01CF909B. >> <http://www.grantthornton.ca/> >> [cid:image002.jpg@01CF909B. >> >> >> Grant Thornton LLP is proud to be >> recognized as one of Canada's best >> workplaces for our sixth consecutive year! >> >> ______________________________ >> Disclaimer: This email is intended solely for the person or entity to >> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >> information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use >> of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is >> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact >> the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. >> >> http://www. >> >> FREDERICTON - The New Brunswick government has launched a lawsuit >> against an accounting firm in an effort to recover $50 million >> provided as loan guarantees to the Miramichi-based Atcon group of >> companies. >> >> The lawsuit filed with the Court of Queen's Bench in Saint John >> alleges that Grant Thornton was in breach of its duties to the >> province in an inspection of the financial books of the Atcon group of >> companies. >> >> The former Liberal government of then premier Shawn Graham provided >> the loan guarantees to the companies in 2009. >> >> The statement of claim alleges the government approved the loan >> guarantees as a result of financial reports from Grant Thornton. >> >> "But for the Grant Thornton opinions and representations, the province >> would not have sustained a loss in excess of $50 million," the >> document asserts. >> >> It says the accounting firm "failed to exercise the care, diligence, >> and skill of an auditor of reasonable competence and prudence." >> >> None of the allegations contained in the statement of claim have been >> proven in court. >> >> Atcon, based in Miramichi, went bankrupt in April 2010. >> >> Grant Thornton LLP, Grant Thornton International and a chartered >> accountant who works for the company are named as the defendants. They >> have not filed a statement of defence and the accountant named in the >> statement of claim could not be reached for comment. >> >> Norm Raynard, managing partner in New Brunswick for Grant Thornton, >> said in an emailed statement that the company would not offer specific >> comments on the lawsuit because they are still reviewing the court >> documents. >> >> "We will vigorously defend ourselves against this action," he wrote. >> >> "Our initial reaction is that this timing has much to do with the >> political calendar in the province." >> >> The next provincial election is set for Sept. 22. >> >> Attorney General Hugh Flemming said the timing is not political. >> >> "This is not a time schedule which in any way was influenced by the >> government and it is not a political issue," he said Tuesday. >> >> He said the government had no choice but to take the matter to court >> because of the $50 million that was spent. >> >> "The government owes a duty to the people of New Brunswick to do what >> they can to recover this," Flemming said. >> >> © Copyright 2014 >> >> >> ------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:43:38 -0400 >> Subject: Re: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny that I warned >> New Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many times >> beginning in 2004 >> To: jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com, pnoble@grantthornton.ca, >> paul.robichaud@gnb.ca, ggilbert@grantthornton.ca, >> nraynard@grantthornton.ca, jdelaney@grantthornton.ca, >> kferguson@grantthornton.ca, blewis@grantthornton.ca, >> krieger@grantthornton.ca, hjaffer@grantthornton.ca, >> rgodbold@grantthornton.ca, pmartin@grantthornton.ca, >> gdent@grantthornton.ca, karrt <karrt@sec.gov>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, oig >> <oig@ftc.gov>, whistleblower <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle >> <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, Whistleblower <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>, >> "dean.buzza"<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, police >> <police@fredericton.ca>, GillesLee <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>, andre >> <andre@jafaust.com>, "peter.dauphinee"<peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>, >> law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>, "rick.hancox"<rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, >> "marie-claude.blais"<marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler" >> <jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>, "luc.labonte"<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>, >> "lucie.dubois"<lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman" >> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc. >> <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net >> rhouston <rhouston@burkerobertson.com>, richard.dearden@gowlings.com, >> "allan.cutler"<allan.cutler@ >> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp- >> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca> >> <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, ottawairc@state.gov, bginsberg >> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com> >> Cc: Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca, David Amos >> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> amacbeath@grantthornton.ca, bmatthews@grantthornton.ca, >> derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca >> >> From: "Matthews, Bev"<Beverley.Matthews@ca.gt.com> >> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 03:36:55 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny >> that I warned New Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many >> times beginning in 2004 >> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> >> Hello, >> >> I have stepped down from my position as General Counsel of Grant >> Thornton as of July 31, 2012. >> >> My successor, Jacqueline Maarse, can be reached at >> jacqueline.maarse@ca.gt.com or at 416 369-7013. >> >> I will respond directly to any e-mails associated with the limited >> matters for which I have responsiblity as Special Counsel to the firm >> or to any e-mails of a personal nature. >> >> Bev Matthews >> >> ______________________________ >> Disclaimer: This email is intended solely for the person or entity to >> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged >> information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing or other use >> of this email by persons or entities other than the addressee is >> prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please contact >> the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 23:36:40 -0400 >> Subject: The politicians and cops etc cannot deny that I warned New >> Brunswick not to trust Grant Thornton and KPMG many times beginning in >> 2004 >> To: pnoble@grantthornton.ca, paul.robichaud@gnb.ca, >> ggilbert@grantthornton.ca, nraynard@grantthornton.ca, >> jdelaney@grantthornton.ca, kferguson@grantthornton.ca, >> blewis@grantthornton.ca, krieger@grantthornton.ca, >> hjaffer@grantthornton.ca, rgodbold@grantthornton.ca, >> pmartin@grantthornton.ca, gdent@grantthornton.ca, karrt >> <karrt@sec.gov>, oig <oig@sec.gov>, oig <oig@ftc.gov>, whistleblower >> <whistleblower@finra.org>, whistle <whistle@fsa.gov.uk>, Whistleblower >> <Whistleblower@ctv.ca>, "dean.buzza"<dean.buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, >> police <police@fredericton.ca>, GillesLee <GillesLee@edmundston.ca>, >> andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "peter.dauphinee" >> <peter.dauphinee@gmail.com>, law <law@stevenfoulds.ca>, "rick.hancox" >> <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca>, "marie-claude.blais" >> <marie-claude.blais@gnb.ca>, "jeff.mockler"<jeff.mockler@gnb.ca>, >> "luc.labonte"<luc.labonte@gnb.ca>, "lucie.dubois" >> <lucie.dubois@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "bernadine.chapman" >> <bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc. >> <cullen1@parl.gc.ca>, "bob.rae"<bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net >> rhouston <rhouston@burkerobertson.com>, richard.dearden@gowlings.com, >> "allan.cutler"<allan.cutler@ >> Stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp- >> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca> >> <marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, ottawairc@state.gov, bginsberg >> <bginsberg@pattonboggs.com> >> Cc: Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca, David Amos >> <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> amacbeath@grantthornton.ca, bmatthews@grantthornton.ca, >> derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca >> >> "Harper, Stephen - M.P."<Harper.S@parl.gc.ca> wrote: >> >> Subject: RE: Re: Lets all go through the looking glass to check the >> Integrity of the Talking Heads in BC tonight >> Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:32:54 -0500 >> From: "Harper, Stephen - M.P."<Harper.S@parl.gc.ca> >> To: <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> >> >> Thank you for your e-mail message to Stephen Harper, Leader of the >> Opposition. Your views and suggestions are important to us. Once they >> have been carefully considered, you may receive a further reply. >> >> *Remember to include your mailing address if you would like a response. >> >> If you prefer to send your thoughts by regular mail, please address them >> to: >> >> Stephen Harper, M.P. >> Leader of the Opposition >> House of Commons >> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6 >> >> maggie.trudel-maggiore@ >> >> Mr. Amos, >> >> thank you for your phone message and several email messages. As the >> Director of Values and Ethics in the departments of Foreign Affairs >> Canada and International Trade Canada, my current mandate applies only >> to internal management issues. For example, establishing a code of >> conduct for our employees as well as providing advice to staff on >> conflict of interest and conflict resolution. >> >> As such I don't think I could be in a position to assist you. Please >> remove my name from your distribution list. >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Maggie Trudel-Maggiore >> A/Director, Values and Ethics >> >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ >> >> The crook Paul Robichaud spewed Pure Double talking Bullshit today >> >> "Robichaud told reporters on Thursday that suing Grant Thornton, the >> company that audited Atcon's financial records, could be considered >> but he said the province is unlikely to follow that specific option. >> >> "[A lawsuit] is something that we could consider, but I already said >> in the past it is not an option that we are going to look at this >> point. But we are looking at every option at this point," Robichaud >> said." >> >> http://www.grantthornton.ca/ >> >> http://www.nbica.org/english/ >> >> The RCMP, Rick Hancox,Bruce Lewis of Fat Fred City and his bosses in >> Upper Canada should at least recall what I explained to them on the >> phone in 2006 before you nasty bastards sent all the cops against me. >> CORRECT??? >> >> GO FIGURE >> >> http://secfilings.nasdaq.com/ >> >> http://qslspolitics.blogspot. >> >> >> My concerns about the severe lack of INTEGRITY of Grant Thornton and >> KPMG obviously had to do with their fraudulent auditing of the >> Brookline Bancorp etc (Putnam Investments is now owned by Power Corp >> BTW) while many Yankees, the USDOJ and the US Treasury Dept attacked >> my family and I in order to cover up their many wrongs. Meanwhile the >> cops and politicians in my nativeland did everything in ther power to >> assist in the many wrongs for nearly 11 years and counting. N'esy Pas? >> >> http://www.powercorporation. >> >> >> >> http://www.nbsc-cvmnb.ca/nbsc/ >> >> 13 December 2012 >> >> Canadian Securities Regulators Publish Discussion Paper on Mutual Fund >> Fees >> >> Toronto – The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) today published >> for comment CSA Discussion Paper 81-407 Mutual Fund Fees, which >> examines the mutual fund fee structure in Canada and identifies >> potential investor protection issues arising from that structure. The >> Discussion Paper sets out various topics for discussion in order to >> evaluate the appropriate structure for Canada. >> >> Canada's mutual fund fees have been the subject of much debate in >> recent years. Some research studies examining Canada's mutual fund >> fees, along with international reforms, have prompted greater interest >> in reviewing the issue of mutual fund fees in Canada. >> >> "Mutual funds are a key investment in the portfolios of many >> Canadians," said Bill Rice, Chair of the CSA and Chair and CEO of the >> Alberta Securities Commission. "It is important that we look at >> Canada's mutual fund fee structure carefully in determining what >> changes could or should be considered to enhance investor protection >> and foster confidence in our market." >> >> To date, the CSA has focused its efforts on enhancing the transparency >> of mutual fund fees and commissions through initiatives such as the >> Point of Sale, and Cost Disclosure and Performance Reporting projects. >> While these initiatives remain a priority on behalf of investors, the >> CSA has determined that it is also necessary to consult extensively >> with investors and market participants to explore whether further >> issues remain. >> >> The CSA welcomes feedback on the Discussion Paper, which can be found >> on CSA members' websites. The comment period is open until April 12, >> 2013. All comments will be considered in the CSA's decision and next >> steps, and also assist in the development of a roundtable the CSA >> plans to hold with investors and industry participants in 2013. >> >> The CSA, the council of the securities regulators of Canada's >> provinces and territories, coordinates and harmonizes regulation for >> the Canadian capital markets. >> >> – 30 – >> >> For more information: >> Wendy Connors-Beckett >> New Brunswick Securities Commission >> 506 643-7745 >> >> Subject: >> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 >> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca >> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> >> January 30, 2007 >> >> WITHOUT PREJUDICE >> >> Mr. David Amos >> >> Dear Mr. Amos: >> >> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, >> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. >> >> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have >> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve >> Graham of the RCMP "J" Division in Fredericton. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Honourable Michael B. Murphy >> Minister of Health >> >> CM/cb >> >> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: >> >> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 >> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, >> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, >> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com, >> John.Foran@gnb.ca, Oda.B@parl.gc.ca, >> "Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has >> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have n >> >> Dear Mr. Amos, >> >> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off over >> the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I was not >> ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. >> >> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position >> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process >> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the >> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these >> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this >> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. >> >> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false >> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear >> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada and >> theUS. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment policing >> in Petitcodiac, NB. >> >> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on >> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Warren McBeath, Cpl. >> GRC Caledonia RCMP >> Traffic Services NCO >> Ph: (506) 387-2222 >> Fax: (506) 387-4622 >> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:59 PM >> Subject: Fw: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: ottawairc@state.gov >> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 10:28 AM >> Subject: Fw: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: doralee.smith@pwgsc.gc.ca ; MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca >> Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 9:49 AM >> Subject: Please press print on this attachment and give it to MacKay >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: eamacleod@cbrmps.cape-breton. >> Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 5:26 PM >> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. >> Matthews >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: comartin.j@parl.gc.ca ; Brown.G@parl.gc.ca ; cotler.i@parl.gc.ca ; >> Hawn.L@parl.gc.ca ; Menard.S@parl.gc.ca ; >> scarpinelli@publicintegrity. >> MacKenzie.D@parl.gc.ca ; Chan.R@parl.gc.ca ; Bevilacqua.M@parl.gc.ca ; >> Batters.D@parl.gc.ca ; Siksay.B@parl.gc.ca ; Anderson.Da@parl.gc.ca ; >> Komarnicki.E@parl.gc.ca >> Cc: SECU@parl.gc.ca ; Breitkreuz.G@parl.gc.ca ; hollam@parl.gc.ca ; >> arnold.zeman@psepc-sppcc.gc.ca ; Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca ; >> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca ; Layton.J@parl.gc.ca ; Godin.Y@parl.gc.ca ; >> McDonough.A@parl.gc.ca ; Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca ; >> gemerson@tor.fasken.com ; garth@garth.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ; >> Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca ; smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; >> news957@rci.rogers.com ; Scott.A@parl.gc.ca ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ; >> leo@primetimecrime.com ; crilf@ucalgary.ca ; >> giuliano.zaccardelli@rcmp-grc. >> stephane.vaillancourt@rcmp- >> info@pco-bcp.gc.ca ; Daniel.Conley@state.ma.us ; kmearn@mpdmilton.org >> ; Freeman.C@parl.gc.ca >> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:52 PM >> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. >> Matthews >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: chanr0@parl.gc.ca >> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 3:00 PM >> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. >> Matthews >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: johnforan.mla@nb.aibn.com ; Chris.Baker@gnb.ca ; >> yvon.leblanc3@gnb.ca ; rachel.bard@gnb.ca ; Louise.LEMON@gnb.ca >> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 2:47 PM >> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. >> Matthews >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: amacbeath@grantthornton.ca >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 2:09 PM >> Subject: Fw: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. >> Matthews >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: bmatthews@grantthornton.ca >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:32 PM >> Subject: Press print on this attachment and call me a liar now Ms. >> Matthews >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: freemc@parl.gc.ca >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 1:00 PM >> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it >> works >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: pmartin@GrantThornton.ca >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 12:07 PM >> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it >> works >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: nraynard@GrantThornton.ca ; jdelaney@GrantThornton.ca ; >> kferguson@GrantThornton.ca ; blewis@GrantThornton.ca >> Cc: krieger@GrantThornton.ca ; hjaffer@GrantThornton.ca ; >> rgodbold@GrantThornton.ca >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:59 AM >> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it >> works >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: gdent@GrantThornton.ca >> Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:04 AM >> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it >> works >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: ckennedy@notes.tcs.treas.gov >> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:32 PM >> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it >> works >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: Raf.Souccar@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; tim.killam@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; >> martin.blais@rcmp-grc.gc.ca ; harrir1@parl.gc.ca ; harrir@parl.gc.ca ; >> peterj@parl.gc.ca >> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 2:44 PM >> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it >> works >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: leo@primetimecrime.com ; gary.bignell@peelpolice.on.ca ; >> crilf@ucalgary.ca >> Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 12:17 PM >> Subject: Fw: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it >> works >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: David Raymond Amos >> To: angie.coss@cjad.com >> Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2006 8:03 PM >> Subject: Angie press print on this attachment I know for a fact it works >> >> Just Dave >> By Location Visit Detail >> Visit 15,578 >> Domain Name (Unknown) >> IP Address 198.235.184.# (Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants) >> ISP Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants >> Location Continent : North America >> Country : Canada (Facts) >> State/Region : Ontario >> City : Toronto >> Lat/Long : 43.6667, -79.4167 (Map) >> Language English (U.S.) en-us >> Operating System Microsoft WinXP >> Browser Internet Explorer 7.0 >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; >> .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729) >> Javascript version 1.3 >> Monitor Resolution : 1280 x 800 >> Color Depth : 32 bits >> Time of Visit Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am >> Last Page View Nov 25 2011 11:41:25 am >> Visit Length 0 seconds >> Page Views 1 >> Referring URL http://www.bing.com/...avid amos&FORM=LENIE >> Search Engine bing.com >> Search Words david amos >> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/ >> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blogspot.com/ >> Out Click >> Time Zone UTC-5:00 >> Visitor's Time Nov 25 2011 10:41:25 am >> Visit Number 15,578 >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "David Amos"<david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> To: <derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca>; <thedderson@gov.nl.ca>; "pm" >> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; <premier@gov.nl.ca>; <pnoble@grantthornton.ca>; >> "ggilbert"<ggilbert@grantthornton.ca>; "Minister.Industry" >> <Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca>; <sheila.fraser@oag-bvg.gc.ca> >> Cc: "IgnatM"<IgnatM@parl.gc.ca>; "maritime_malaise" >> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>; <ducepg@parl.gc.ca> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 2:00 PM >> Subject: Tell me another one Mr Rideout after you talk to Brian >> Crawley perhaps you PCs should consider returning my calls EH? >> >> >> Representative of the Leader's Office >> Mr. Derrick Rideout >> Principal Assistant to the Premier >> Email: derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca >> >> From: Derrick Rideout <derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca> >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:33:19 -0700 (PDT) >> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, >> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> >> Don't know why i was sent this. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "Auto-reply from csheahan@pa-law.ca"<csheahan@pa-law.ca> >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:22:37 -0400 >> Subject: Re: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, >> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >> Please be advised that I will be away from the office from April 1, >> 2011 to April 11, 2011 (inclusive). If you require immediate >> assistance, please contact Debbie White at 709-634-3136. Thank you, >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "Williams, Norm"<nwilliams@grantthornton.ca> >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:23:15 -0400 >> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: RE Financial oversight the media, >> the SEC, Madoff, Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> >> Thank you for contacting Grant Thornton LLP. Norm Williams, CA has >> withdrawn from the firm effective December 31, 2010 and will be >> transitioning his files to other professionals within the firm over >> the next few weeks. If you have immediate needs please contact Bill >> Budgell at bbudgell@GrantThornton.ca or (709) 778-8802 and we will be >> pleased to service your needs. >> This email is intended solely for the person or entity to which it is >> addressed and may contain confidential and/or >> privileged information. Any review, dissemination, copying, printing >> or other use of this email by persons or entities other >> than the addressee is prohibited. If you have received this email in >> error, please contact the sender immediately and >> delete the material from any computer. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:56:23 -0300 >> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, >> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: pnoble@grantthornton.ca, ggilbert@grantthornton.ca >> Cc: "Minister.Industry"<Minister.Industry@ic.gc.ca>, "sheila. fraser" >> <sheila.fraser@oag-bvg.gc.ca>, ducepg <ducepg@parl.gc.ca> >> >> http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/ccc/ >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:22:34 -0300 >> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, >> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: pcparty@nf.aibn.com, derrickrideout001@yahoo.ca, jbabb@babblaw.ca, >> cynthia_downey@hotmail.com, "ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca" >> <ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca>, "David.ALWARD@gnb.ca"<David.ALWARD@gnb.ca> >> Cc: nwilliams@grantthornton.ca, csheahan@pa-law.ca, abugden@pa-law.ca, >> maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.com> >> >> I just called agsin. Heres why >> >> http://www.dunderdale2011.ca/ >> >> Just Dave >> By Location Visit Detail >> Visit 13,631 >> Domain Name shawcable.net ? (Network) >> IP Address 24.85.83.# (Shaw Communications) >> ISP Shaw Communications >> Location Continent : North America >> Country : Canada (Facts) >> State/Region : British Columbia >> City : Vancouver >> Lat/Long : 49.25, -123.1333 (Map) >> Language English (U.S.) en-us >> Operating System Macintosh MacOSX >> Browser Safari 1.3 >> Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_5; en-us) >> AppleWebKit/533.19.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0.3 Safari/533.19.4 >> Javascript version 1.5 >> Monitor Resolution : 1152 x 720 >> Color Depth : 24 bits >> Time of Visit Apr 12 2011 10:27:57 pm >> Last Page View Apr 12 2011 10:27:57 pm >> Visit Length 0 seconds >> Page Views 1 >> Referring URL http://www.google.ca... >> Search Engine google.ca >> Search Words babblaw.ca >> Visit Entry Page http://davidamos.blo...06/04/ >> Visit Exit Page http://davidamos.blo...06/04/ >> Out Click >> Time Zone UTC-8:00 >> Visitor's Time Apr 12 2011 6:27:57 pm >> Visit Number 13,631 >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:46:59 -0300 >> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, >> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: mark@snellingcenter.org >> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:16:39 -0300 >> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, >> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: Harriet.Johnson@state.vt.us, michael.clasen@state.vt.us, >> Harold@haroldalbrechtmp.ca, colleen@snellingcenter.org >> Cc: "PATRICK. MURPHY"<PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov>, "jacques.boucher" >> <jacques.boucher@rcmp-grc.gc. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:35:28 -0300 >> Subject: Fwd: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, >> Putnam and the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: GovernorVT@state.vt.us, jeb.spaulding@state.vt.us >> Cc: cmain2@bloomberg.net >> >> http://www.bloomberg.com/news/ >> >> Whats this? A possibly ethical Governor in Vermont? I tried talking to >> his people Heres hoping that he emails me back because his help >> suddenly got busy didn't ask for my number. >> >> "Vermont's governor, Democrat Peter Shumlin, has said he seeks to use >> an escape clause in the law to create a government- run health system >> that would cover every resident and put private insurers, including >> Cigna Corp. (CI), out of business in that state." >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:15:49 -0300 >> Subject: RE Financial oversight the media, the SEC, Madoff, Putnam and >> the Whistleblower @ 1-866-96-FINRA etc etc >> To: whistleblower@finra.org, michael_copeland@fortunemail. >> letters@fortune.com, susan.pulliam@wsj.com, Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, >> meredith.goodman@latimes.com, ninkster@navigantconsulting. >> dgolub@sgtlaw.com, firstselectmanffld@town. >> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras@cbc.ca >> Cc: oig <oig@sec.gov>, "Dean.Buzza"<Dean.Buzza@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, >> "Fred. Pretorius"<Fred.Pretorius@gov.yk.ca>, "rick.hancox" >> <rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca> >> >> http://qslspolitics.blogspot. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "Olsen, Wendy (USANYS)"Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov >> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:21:08 -0400 >> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US >> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY >> To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, USANYS-MADOFF >> USANYS.MADOFF@usdoj.gov, "Litt, Marc (USANYS)"Marc.Litt@usdoj.gov Cc: >> webo webo@xplornet.com, vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, >> krishnamurthyp@sec.gov >> >> Thank you for your response. >> >> Wendy Olsen >> Victim Witness Coordinator >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@ >> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 8:48 AM >> To: USANYS-MADOFF; Olsen, Wendy (USANYS); Litt, Marc (USANYS) >> Cc: webo; vasilescua@sec.gov; friedmani@sec.gov; krishnamurthyp@sec.gov >> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US >> ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY >> >> Ms Olsen >> >> Thank you for keeping me informed. >> >> Yes unseal all my emails with all their attachments immediately and >> make certain that the US Attorny's office finally practices full >> disclosurement as to who I am and what my concerns are as per the Rule >> of Law within a purported democracy. >> >> As you folks all well know I am not a shy man and I have done nothing >> wrong. It appears to me that bureacratic people only use the right to >> privacy of others when it suits their malicious ends in order to >> protect their butts from impreacment, litigation and prosecution. >> >> The people in the US Attorney's Office and the SEC etc are very well >> aware that I protested immediately to everyone I could think of when >> the instant I knew that my correspondences went under seal and Madoff >> pled guilty so quickly and yet another cover up involing my actions >> was under full steam. Everybody knows that.the US Government has been >> trying to keep my concerns about the rampant public corruption a >> secret for well over seven long years. However now that a lot of >> people and their countries in general are losing a lot of money people >> are beginning to remember just exactly who I am and what i did >> beginning over seven years ago.. >> >> Veritas Vincit >> David Raymond Amos >> 506 756 8687 begin_of_the_skype_ >> end_of_the_skype_highlighting >> >> P.S. For the record Obviously I pounced on these Yankee bastards as >> soon as the newsrag in Boston published this article on the web last >> night. >> >> http://www.bostonherald.com/ >> >> Notice that Nester just like everyone else would not say my name? It >> is because my issues surrounding both Madoff and are NOT marketing >> timing They are as you all well know money laundering, fraud, forgery, >> perjury, securites fraud, tax fraud, Bank fraud, illegal wiretappping >> and Murder amongst other very serious crimes. >> >> >> "SEC spokesman John Nester dismissed similarities between Markopolos >> and Scannell's cases as "not a valid comparison." >> >> He said the SEC determined the market-timing by Putnam clients that >> Scannell reported didn't violate federal law. Nester said the SEC only >> acted after another tipster alleged undisclosed market-timing by some >> Putnam insiders. >> >> Scannell, now a crusader for SEC reforms, isn't surprised the agency >> is in hot water again. >> >> Noting that several top SEC officials have gone on to high-paying >> private-sector jobs, he believes hopes for future employment impact >> investigations. "It's a distinct disadvantage to make waves before you >> enter the private sector," Scannell said." >> >> >> --- On Mon, 3/30/09, David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com wrote: >> >> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S >> OFFICE >> SDNY >> To: NesterJ@sec.gov, letterstoeditor@bostonherald. >> oig@sec.gov, Thunter@tribune.com, david@davidmyles.com, >> ddexter@ns.sympatico.ca, "Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.net >> Cc: dsheehan@bakerlaw.com, dspelfogel@bakerlaw.com, >> mc@whistleblowers.org, gkachroo@mccarter.com, >> david.straube@accenture.com, gurdip.s.sahota@accenture.com, >> benjamin_mcmurray@ao.uscourts. >> Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 10:00 PM >> >> Need I say BULLSHIT? >> >> http://www.bostonherald.com/ >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:03:13 -0300 >> Subject: RE: USANYS-MADOFF IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US ATTORNEY'S >> OFFICE >> SDNY >> To: Russ.Stanton@latimes.com, meredith.goodman@latimes.com, >> ninkster@navigantconsulting. >> Cc: firstselectmanffld@town. >> editor@whatsupfairfield.com, info@csiworld.org, jacques_poitras >> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 16:45:07 -0300 >> Subject: RE Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, Wikileaks and Daniel >> Ellsberg >> etc >> To: ellsbergpress@gmail.com, info@armycourtmartialdefense. >> "birgittaj@althingi.is"<birgittaj@althingi.is>, "Julian Assange)" >> <editor@wikileaks.org>, julian@sunshinepress.org, >> julian@wikileaks.org, smari <smari@immi.is> >> Cc: cindy@eff.org, clg_news@legitgov.org, maritime_malaise >> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, Wayne_Boone@carleton.ca >> >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:33:32 -0400 >> Subject: Notice that I knew Assange before he got World Famous? >> To: CLG_News <clg_news@legitgov.org> >> >> From: "Julian Assange)"<editor@wikileaks.org> >> Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:15:46 +0000 (GMT) >> Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven >> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >> FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >> >> More info http://immi.is/ >> >> Julian Assange >> Editor >> WikiLeaks >> http://wikileaks.org/ >> >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 17:14:22 -0400 >> Subject: RE Bradley Manning: National Traitor or Hero of the People? I >> just called again Correct Rev. Jason Lydon? >> To: info@openmediaboston.org, info@commchurch.org >> Cc: "birgittaj@althingi.is"<birgittaj@althingi.is>, editor >> <editor@clearwisdom.net>, "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca> >> >> http://www.bradleymanning.org/ >> >> http://openmediaboston.org/ >> >> Rev. Jason Lydon, Minister >> Community Church of Boston >> 565 Boylston Street >> Boston, MA 02116 >> (617) 266-6710 >> (617) 266-0449 (fax) >> info@commchurch.org >> http://www. >> >> >> >> http://www.aclum.org/legal/re_ >> >> From: Christopher Ott <cott@aclum.org> >> Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 15:04:25 -0500 >> Subject: Out of Office AutoReply: Re Wikileaks and Pfc Manning etc I >> just called you Mr Coombs my number is 902 800 0369 Correct? >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> >> I'll be out of the office until Wednesday, March 9, but will return >> your message as soon as possible. >> >> Chris Ott >> -- >> >> Christopher Ott | Communications Director >> ACLU of Massachusetts | 211 Congress St., 3rd Floor | Boston, MA 02110 >> >> cott@aclum.org | http://aclum.org >> >> 617.482.3170 x322 (office) | 617.451.0009 (fax) >> >> www.aclum.org/alerts | www.aclum.org/blog | www.aclum.org/facebook >> | www.aclum.org/podcasts >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 23:26:39 -0400 >> Subject: Re Wikileaks and Pfc Manning etc I just called you Mr Coombs >> my number is 902 800 0369 Correct? >> To: info@armycourtmartialdefense. >> <birgittaj@althingi.is>, "Julian Assange)"<editor@wikileaks.org>, >> julian <julian@sunshinepress.org>, julian <julian@wikileaks.org>, >> marcia@eff.org, rainey@eff.org, cindy@eff.org, mattz@eff.org, >> pde@eff.org, chris@eff.org, postur@serstakursaksoknari.is, >> postur@irr.is, postur@for.stjr.is, president@president.is >> Cc: "rick. skinner"<rick.skinner@dhs.gov>, >> "william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc. >> "john.adams"<john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca>, rls@rls.is, maritime_malaise >> <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> >> >> http://www. >> >> http://www. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Wayne_Boone <Wayne_Boone@carleton.ca> >> Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 09:51:21 -0500 >> Subject: RE: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my >> friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome? >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> >> I am not certain why you sent this to me, David. >> >> Sincerely, >> Wayne Boone CD PhD >> Assistant Professor, Infrastructure Protection and International >> Security (IPIS) Program >> The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs (NPSIA) >> Deputy Director, Canadian Centre of Intelligence and Security Studies >> (CCISS) >> Room 1315 Dunton Tower >> Tel: +1 613-520-2600 ext. 6672 >> Cell: +1 613 863-2993 >> Fax: +1 613-520-2889 >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: David Amos [mailto:david.raymond.amos@ >> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 9:43 AM >> To: wayne_boone@carleton.ca; dcarment@ccs.carleton.ca; >> Melissa_Haussman; jeremy_littlewood@carleton.ca; RICHARD_NIMIJEAN >> Cc: maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca; amy_guest@carleton.ca; danfour; plee; >> pleebooks >> Subject: Fwd: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my >> friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome? >> >> http://www1.carleton.ca/ >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 23:00:16 -0400 >> Subject: I noticed you report about Assange etc but not about my >> friend Birgitta Jonsdottir Howcome? >> To: CLG_News <clg_news@legitgov.org> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir <birgittajoy@gmail.com> >> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 22:37:13 +0000 >> Subject: Re: RE Canada, the USA, Iceland, Wikileaks, IMMI and Bankers >> etc the US Attorney Marc Litt no doubt remembers me EH Wendy? >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >> >> got your letter David >> will try to find time to read all the information soon >> >> all my best >> birgitta >> >> On Jan 8, 2011, at 4:06 PM, David Amos wrote: >> >>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot. >>> >>> >>> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, Hancox, Rick (NBSC/CVMNB) >>> <Rick.Hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> From: Hancox, Rick (NBSC/CVMNB) <Rick.Hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca> >>> Subject: Out of Office: FYI pursuant to the voicemails from Joyce I >>> talked to her and Laura in Clarke's offices >>> To: "David Amos"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> >>> Received: Friday, January 7, 2011, 10:19 PM >>> >>> >>> G'Day/Bonjour, Thanks for your e-mail. I am out of the office until >>> Monday 10 January, at which time I should be able to respond to your >>> email. If you need more immediate assistance, please call Gisele >>> Allard at 506 658-2696. Thanks/Merci Rick >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> >>> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:19:39 -0800 (PST) >>> Subject: FYI pursuant to the voicemails from Joyce I talked to her and >>> Laura in Clarke's offices >>> To: Clarkr@parl.gc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, >>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> <Randy.McGinnis@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> duncal@parl.gc.ca, "rick. skinner"<rick.skinner@dhs.gov>, >>> rick.hancox@nbsc-cvmnb.ca, murphb1@parl.gc.ca, "PATRICK. MURPHY" >>> <PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov>, birgitta@this.is >>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, mike.olscamp@gnb.ca, >>> kirk.macdonald@gnb.ca, mike.wilson@fredericton.ca, "jack.macdougall" >>> <jack.macdougall@greenparty.ca >>> ychoukri@wstephenson.com, toewsv1 <toewsv1@parl.gc.ca>, >>> Travis.ndp@gmail.com, robert.trevors@gnb.ca, >>> roberttrevors@nbnet.nb.ca, "Gilles. Blinn" >>> <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "gilles.moreau" >>> <gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >>> >>> http://www.robclarkemp.ca/ >>> >>> --- On Fri, 1/7/11, David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> Subject: I am on the phone to Mr Cullen right now >>> To: Cullen@parl.gc.ca >>> Cc: "maritime_malaise"<maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> >>> Received: Friday, January 7, 2011, 7:27 PM >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:29:28 -0400 >>> Subject: Attn Rebbecca Regan 1 415 436 9333 ext 135 >>> To: info@eff.org, information@eff.org >>> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Facebook <notification+zz2y6stc@ >>> Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 04:35:07 -0800 >>> Subject: Birgitta Jonsdottir confirmed you as a friend on Facebook... >>> To: David Raymond Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> Hi David, >>> Birgitta confirmed you as a friend on Facebook. >>> Thanks, >>> The Facebook Team >>> To view Birgitta's profile or write on her Wall, follow this link: >>> http://www.facebook.com/ >>> ============================== >>> This message was intended for david.raymond.amos@gmail.com. If you do >>> not wish to receive this type of email from Facebook in the future, >>> please follow the link below to unsubscribe. >>> http://www.facebook.com/o.php? >>> Facebook, Inc. P.O. Box 10005, Palo Alto, CA 94303 >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 11:32:28 -0400 >>> Subject: Birgitta I don't know if you will get my message in Facebook >>> so I also sent it this way as a doublecheck >>> To: birgittajoy@gmail.com >>> Cc: maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, ingaorama@gmail.com, >>> agnyrose@hotmail.com, stjani79@hotmail.com, birgitta@this.is >>> >>> Happy New Year Birgitta >>> >>> My foes have been fairly wicked as of late and attacking my friends as >>> well. I may head the smiling bastards off at the pass so to speak go >>> into the woods again with no internet etc before I get a bums rush and >>> possibly lose another good friend. >>> >>> Thus I am passing around the world many email exchanges of mine over >>> the years before I am out of touch with everyone. One of them is ours >>> from December 8th. I will forward you one example byway of gmail so >>> you will see I did not put you down and that accurate I felt you were >>> entitled to know so that you would not think I was using your name >>> behind your back. >>> >>> I understand that you must be busy particulary over Xmass. Trust that >>> I am still a fan of yours but I must defend my butt fromany cops etc >>> and try to keep out of jail the best way I know how with what little >>> assets I have. >>> >>> I truly do wish you well but I do wish Iceland and then later IMMI had >>> checked my work and got back to me long ago. >>> >>> If nothing else please check out this old blog. It contains a very >>> rare document that should be of interest to IMMI or any whistleblower >>> that as an interest in money. The nasty left wing blogger dude does >>> like me at all but at least he created it one month before the RCMP >>> falsely arrested me and many months before Iceland lost its shirt to >>> the very corrupt banksters. His blog seems to have certain crooks >>> quite nervous. If the Yankees, Brits, Saudis and zionists etc are >>> reading his old blogs about mean old me perhaps IMMI should save them >>> before they go "Poof" too? >>> >>> Here is just one that somebody intereting was checking ot yesterday. >>> lets just say that Jullian Assange is not the only guy who knows his >>> way around the Internet. Hell he probably does not even know what the >>> CSE is. Do you? >>> >>> http://qslspolitics.blogspot. >>> >>> Verita Vincit >>> David Raymond Amos >>> >>> P.S. My phone number is 902 800 0369 and I attempted to befriend you >>> Skpe last spring in order to try to talk to you but you must have >>> opted to ignore a stranger >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2011 09:41:41 -0400 >>> Subject: Most folks do not know this lady or what IMMMI is YET. But >>> Wikileaks certainly does EH Wayne Lang of the GRC?. >>> To: arsenault_chris@hotmail.com, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" >>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, danfour <danfour@myginch.com>, >>> advocacycollective <advocacycollective@yahoo.com> >>> carole <carole@libertymedia.com>, "Wayne.Lang" >>> <Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Barry.MacKnight" >>> <Barry.MacKnight@fredericton. >>> Cc: "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, acampbell >>> <acampbell@ctv.ca>, maritime_malaise <maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca>, >>> Alex@nbu.ca >>> >>> From: Birgitta Jonsdottir >>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000 >>> Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the >>> first email I ever sent you >>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>> >>> dear Dave >>> i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i >>> find some time >>> keep up the good fight in the meantime >>> >>> thank you for bearing with me >>> i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters >>> and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and >>> the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:) >>> plus all the matters in relation to immi >>> >>> with oceans of joy >>> birgitta >>> >>> >>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 1:35 AM, David Amos wrote: >>> >>>> I truly enjoyed talking to you. More to the point I am happy you took >>>> the time to listen to mean old me. I was impressed with your openess >>>> and honesty. In return I took a bit of time to study you more closely >>>> on the Internet and I am now even more impressed to view the artist in >>>> you. To hell with the politics and the money for a minute. At the >>>> risk of sounding odd your sincere soul that I sensed in your voice >>>> came shining through the various webpages. An honest person practicing >>>> the wicked art of politicking is a rare thing indeed. I must confess >>>> that I grinned at the possibility of crossing paths with another >>>> kindred soul when I saw you employ the expression Me Myself and I >>>> because I often use that expresssion >>>> >>>> I also sent you another email to your politcal email address on June >>>> 24th, 2010 right after you spoke on CBC. (I can resend it if you wish) >>>> When you folks ignored that and my calls and only sent me nasty >>>> responses I gave up on Iceland and IMMI because I had made everyone >>>> well aware I had no respect for Assange and corrupt parliamentarians >>>> whatsoever. Assange became the big celebrity after releasing the video >>>> from Iraq but I felt sorry for the kid who went to jail that had given >>>> him the stuff. Obviously I sent you folks the email below long before >>>> Assange made the scene in Iceland. Rest assured that I sent him >>>> evidence of my concerns about Iceland or he would not had sent me his >>>> bragging emails the following March. >>>> >>>> Now that Assange is in jail with no hope of bail like I was a couple >>>> of times after CBC has been yapping about him for weeks I was feeling >>>> a little vindictive so I opted to tease some of his friends and fans >>>> (such as McCarthy and CBC) by reminding them that I was still alive, >>>> not in jail and kicking like hell. (A host of cops in seven cars >>>> pounced on my son (who was visiting me) and I at 2;30 in the morning >>>> right after the results of the recent election was annnounced Although >>>> I managed to run them off this time need I say it really pissed me off >>>> and saddend me to put him on a bus back to Boston) >>>> >>>> I did not send you that email with the pdf files attached from my new >>>> Yahoo address but you will get it in a bit. Heres hoping you will >>>> enjoy it. >>>> >>>> Best Regards >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 22:33:10 -0300 >>>> Subject: RE: Iceland and Bankers Whereas the politicians ignore me >>>> maybe some fellow bloggers will listen to me eh? >>>> To: jong@althingi.is, kristjanj@althingi.is, olofn@althingi.is, >>>> petur@althingi.is, rea@althingi.is, ragnheidurr@althingi.is, >>>> sdg@althingi.is, sij@althingi.is, siv@althingi.is, >>>> tryggvih@althingi.is, ubk@althingi.is, vigdish@althingi.is, >>>> thkg@althingi.is, thorsaari@althingi.is >>>> Cc: margrett@althingi.is, thorgerdur@thorgerdur.is, saari@centrum.is, >>>> ha030002@unak.is, svanurmd@hotmail.com, baddiblue@gmail.com, >>>> dominus@islandia.is, birgitta@this.is, einar@smart.is >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:23:15 -0300 >>>> Subject: Fwd: You mentioned Iceland and Bankers just now and I smiled >>>> To: johanna@althingi.is >>>> Cc: "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, Dan Fitzgerald >>>> <danf@danf.net> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 20:52:42 -0300 >>>> Subject: You mentioned Iceland and Bankers just now and I smiled >>>> To: wmreditor@waynemadsenreport. >>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:24:42 -0300 >>>>> Subject: Fwd: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious >>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years? >>>>> To: vasilescua@sec.gov, friedmani@sec.gov, krishnamurthyp@sec.gov, >>>>> horwitzd@dsmo.com, wrobleskin@dsmo.com, wolfem@dicksteinshapiro.com, >>>>> Lisa.Baroni@usdoj.gov, ssbny@aol.com, service@ssbla.com, >>>>> rwing@lswlaw.com, rriccio@mdmc-law.com, lmodugno@mdmc-law.com, >>>>> griffinger@gibbonslaw.com, mmulholland@rmfpc.com, kmalerba@rmfpc.com, >>>>> tlieverman@srkw-law.com >>>>> Cc: webo <webo@xplornet.com>, John.Sinclair@nbimc.com, >>>>> Norma.Kennedy@nbimc.com, jan.imeson@nbimc.com, mc.blais@pcnb.org >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if any lawyer will bother to read this email, understand it >>>>> and call me back >>>>> >>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>> From: postur@fjr.stjr.is >>>>> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:06:39 +0000 >>>>> Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious >>>>> question. Why have you people ignored me for three years? >>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> Dear David Amos >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to >>>>> incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our >>>>> office. >>>>> >>>>> We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web >>>>> site >>>>> www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical information >>>>> regarding the economic crisis in Iceland. >>>>> >>>>> Greetings from the Ministry of Finance. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Frá: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>>> Dags: 29.01.2009 19:17:43 >>>>> Til: johanna.sigurdardottir@fel. >>>>> aih@cbc.ca, >>>>> Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is, >>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca, >>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com, >>>>> egilla@althingi.is, >>>>> william.turner@exsultate.ca, klm@althingi.is, mail@fjr.stjr.is, >>>>> Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca, wendy.williams@landsbanki.is, >>>>> cdhowe@cdhowe.org, >>>>> desparois.sylviane@fcac.gc.ca, plee@stu.ca, "oldmaison@yahoo.com" >>>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, "t.j.burke@gnb.ca"<t.j.burke@gnb.ca>, Dan >>>>> Fitzgerald <danf@danf.net>, jonina.s.larusdottir@ivr.stjr. >>>>> Afrit: fyrirspurn@fme.is, audur@audur.is, fme@fme.is, >>>>> info@landsbanki.is, sedlabanki@sedlabanki.is, tif@tif.is >>>>> Efni: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious question. Why >>>>> have you people ignored me for three years? >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> >>>>> FYI Some folks in Canada are watching your actions or lack thereof >>>>> more closely than others. As you well know I am one. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.topix.com/forum/ >>>>> >>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >>>>> >>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>>> You folks should not deny certain responses that I have received over >>>>> the course of the last few months from your country CORRECT? >>>>> >>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:57:55 -0300 >>>>> Subject: Re: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland >>>>> To: postur@for.stjr.is >>>>> >>>>> Thanx >>>>> >>>>> On 10/8/08, postur@for.stjr.is<postur@for.stjr.is> wrote: >>>>> David Raymond Amos >>>>> >>>>> Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and >>>>> waits >>>>> attendance. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> From: Fjármálaeftirlitið - Fyrirspurn <fyrirspurn@fme.is> >>>>> Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 12:23:41 -0000 >>>>> Subject: Staðfesting á móttöku >>>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>>> >>>>> Fjármálaeftirlitið hefur móttekið erindi yðar. Erindinu verður svarað >>>>> við fyrsta tækifæri. Vakin er athygli á heimasíðu >>>>> Fjármálaeftirlitsins, http://www.fme.is. Þar má finna ýmsar >>>>> upplýsingar ásamt svörum við algengum spurningum: >>>>> http://www.fme.is/?PageID=863. >>>>> >>>>> The Financial Supervisory Authority (FME) of Iceland confirms the >>>>> receipt of your e-mail. Your e-mail will be answered as soon as >>>>> possible. We would like to point out our website, http://www.fme.is. >>>>> There you can find information and answeres to frequently asked >>>>> questions: http://www.fme.is/?PageID=864. >>>>> >>>>> Kveðja / Best Regards >>>>> >>>>> Fjármálaeftirlitið / Financial Supervisory Authority, Iceland >>>>> >>>>> Sími / Tel.: (+354) 525 2700 >>>>> >>>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 10:53:47 -0300 >>>>> Subject: I just called to remind the Speaker, the Bankers and the >>>>> Icelanders that I still exist EH Mrs Mrechant, Bob Rae and Iggy? >>>>> To: Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is, >>>>> rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca, >>>>> marie@mariemorneau.com, dfranklin@franklinlegal.com, >>>>> egilla@althingi.is, william.turner@exsultate.ca >>>>> Cc: Rae.B@parl.gc.ca, Ignatieff.M@parl.gc.ca, lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca, >>>>> merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca, coolsa@sen.parl.gc.ca, olived@sen.parl.gc.ca >>>>> >>>>> All of you should review the documents and CD that came with this >>>>> letter ASAP EH? >>>>> >>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >>>>> >>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >>>>> >>>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps Geir Haarde and Steingrimur Sigfusson should call me at 506 >>>>> 756 >>>>> 8687 >>>>> >>>>> Veritas Vincit >>>>> David Raymond Amos >>>> >>>> I am listening to RBN right now. >>>> >>>> I explained a bit of my concerns to people down your way but either >>>> the talk shows are never aired or I am now banished from their >>>> talkshow forums. >>>> >>>> Do I sound like that bad a fellow? >>>> >>>> http://www.archive.org/ >>>> >>>> http://www.archive.org/ >>>> >>>> http://www.archive.org/ >>>> >>>> http://www.archive.org/ >>>> >>>> http://www.archive.org/ >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> >>>> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:36:32 -0300 >>>> Subject: RE the Fed and my whistle blowing efforts in that regard >>>> To: thecommonsenseshow <thecommonsenseshow@yahoo.com> >>>> >>>> These are the missing hearings I am trying to tell you about >>>> >>>> http://banking.senate.gov/ >>>> >>>> http://banking.senate.gov/ >>>> >>>> Me talking about a bit Spitzer the year before he got arrested >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >>>> >>>> Me talking about Spitzer briefly after he got arrested >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >>>> >>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >>>> >>>> >>>> This is the first page of where I store of my files for public view. >>>> >>>> http://www.scribd.com/people/ >>>> >>>> This is some of my Spitzer stuff as it pertains to New York Do you >>>> know of dr Ward Dean? >>>> >>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >>>> >>>> You can find some of my stuff pertaining to the Fed within this file >>>> >>>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/ >>>> >>>> Anyone can see the email between the US Attorney in New York and many >>>> other lawyers etc before and after Madoff plead guilty. I posted it >>>> right here beginning in comment #327 within a wicked little forum >>>> about corrupt lawyers and judges on Long Island New York >>>> >>>> http://www.theschwartzreport. >>> >>> Birgitta Jonsdottir >>> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884 >>> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com - >>> http://www.facebook.com/ >>> >>> >>> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are >>> not. >>> >>> >>> Andre Gide >> >> Birgitta Jonsdottir >> Birkimelur 8, 107 Reykjavik, Iceland, tel: 354 692 8884 >> http://this.is/birgitta - http://joyb.blogspot.com - >> http://www.facebook.com/ >> >> >> Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are >> not. >> >> >> Andre Gide >> >> Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 13:31:06 -0700 (PDT) >> From: David Amos <motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com> >> Subject: Say hey to Arthur Hamilton and Peter Mackay for me will ya? >> To: r.houston@burkerobertson.com, rhouston@burkerobertson.com, >> richard.dearden@gowlings.com, tconway@mccarthy.ca, >> riddella@solowaywright.com >> CC: david.allgood@rbc.com, mackay.p@parl.gc.ca, stronach.b@parl.gc.ca, >> moore.r@parl.gc.ca >> >> >> I remember you Mr Deardon. Remember me? You were the Auditor General, >> Sheila Fraser's lawyer in the Gomery matter. The last thing you are is >> ethical EH? I also remember quite a crowd of you dudes from McCarthy >> over the years as well. Need a I say you are all less honourable than >> "AL" If you think I am a liar sue me, will ya. One thing I know for >> certain Stevey Boy Harper won't have Parliamentry immunity when I sue >> him. >> >> PM invokes immunity to avoid testifying at ex-candidate's libel trial >> >> Tim Naumetz, The Ottawa Citizen >> Published: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 >> >> Prime Minister Stephen Harper is claiming parliamentary immunity to >> avoid giving evidence in a libel lawsuit launched by a prominent >> Ottawa lawyer who stepped aside as an election candidate to make way >> for sponsorship whistleblower Allan Cutler. >> >> Mr. Harper's lawyer, Richard Dearden, told court yesterday sections of >> the > > > > |