---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 08:27:31 -0400
Subject: The RCMP and the FBI know Judge Sydney Hanlon has pile of
wiretap tapes and her buddy Mark Coven is the crooked Yankee judge who
ordered our home in Milton sold illegally in order to bust up my Clan
in a effort to try to stop me
To: hb@hbjustice.com, newsdesk@independent.co.uk,
tmarthey@prestonnj.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
news@kingscorecord.com, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com
djtjr@trumporg.com, jureneck@comcast.net,
support@fatherhoodcoaltion.org
ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
washington field washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov
Everybody and his dog knows that it was Janet Reno's evil buddy
Dorchester District Court Judge Sydney Hanlon who had me falsely
imprisoned 2004 and who issued the warrant for my arrest that is still
in effect to this very day
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Hanlon Part One
183 views
joeu02
Published on Apr 2, 2009
Part One
www.fatherhoodcoalition.org 617 SAD-DADS
Nomination hearing for Sydney Hanlon to the Massachusetts Appeals
Court. The nomination of Judge Hanlon, currently a district court
judge, was opposed by representatives of The Fatherhood Coalition
(Part 4[end], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12[end] and 13) because of her active
promotion of the domestic violence legal system. Dorchester District
Court under Judge Hanlon was one of three courts nationwide used as a
domestic violence court model/prototype by the US Justice Department.
The council also voted 4-3 to confirm the nomination of Laurie MacLeod
to be a judge at the Palmer district court (Part 11 and 12). Atty.
MacLeod's nomination. Two weeks earlier when the council's presiding
officer Lt. Gov. Murray closed the council meeting without a vote on
MacLeod she was expected to lose. The vote change came about because
one councilor opposed to MacLeod was absent due to a family death
while another councilor supporting MacLeod, absent at the previous
meeting, was in attendence. There are apparently no provisions to
prevent the manipulation of council votes in this way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Interview with Quincy Distric Judge Mark Coven
25 views
Discovering the Law
Published on Jul 8, 2018
Quincy District Court Chief Justice Mark Coven addresses the opiod
epidemic and explains the role that specialty courts play in this
fight.
If aanyone bothered t read the documents I sent earlier our troubles
with the very corrupt Yankee justice system began with the very
corrupt Yankee Judge Paula Carey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Chief Justice Paula Carey on her new role
526 views
MassLW
Published on Aug 14, 2013
Trial Court Chief Justice Paula M. Carey discusses the newly created
position she was appointed to fill and her overall approach to the
job.
Everybody knows it was former Plymouth County Probate and Family Court
Judge Michael J. Livingstone who attacked our beach house after I sued
Carey et al and before I ran for a seat Parliament in 2004
https://www.southcoasttoday.
http://www.southofboston.net/
https://www.masscops.com/
Surprise! Disgraced ex-judge best man for the job
By Howie Carr
Friday, January 30, 2009
What hiring freeze? There has been another nationwide search, and the
winner is disgraced ex-state judge and State House hack Michael
Livingstone.
Did someone say something about a state budgetary “crisis”?
You’ve read about Livingstone. Until last June, he was a probate and
family court judge in Plymouth County. Then he cut a deal with the
Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, which dropped various
charges against him in return for his resignation.
The allegations included sending a threat to a Section 8 tenant,
secretly grabbing fees from former clients and claiming as income tax
deductions various business expenses relating to his allegedly closed
law practice.
A bent Massachusetts state judge. Stop me if you’ve heard this one before.
Livingstone resigned June 12. Then began the longest, most
nerve-wracking 148 days of his worthless layabout life. That was how
long it took him to wedge his snout back into the public trough.
His new employer is Bristol County Sheriff Tom Hodgson, a good guy.
Hodgson, a Republican, hired the bust-out judge as “coordinator of
contract compliance.” Livingstone is taking a huge pay cut, from his
$129,000 judicial pay to $39,197.25 a year. Boo-hoo.
You know how when judges are making their annual demand for a pay
hike, they always claim they could be making really, really big bucks
in the Dreaded Private Sector. It’s their little fantasy, and I’m
being kind. Livingstone is the reality. Without their robes, 99
percent of these hack judges would be starving to death, desperate to
make anything close to the $39,000 Livingstone is collecting.
A call was placed to Sheriff Hodgson about his new employee.
“I asked him what had happened,” the sheriff said, “and he told me
these were administrative charges, not criminal. He said he had gotten
a letter saying what he’d done was permitted, but that the commission
didn’t think so.”
And of course, the sheriff also got a few calls. One came from ex-Sen.
Biff MacLean, the caudillo of Bristol County, fined $512,000 on his
way out the door. The sheriff said he also heard from “Mayor Markey” -
that would be Judge Jack Markey of New Bedford, himself suspended
without pay from the bench for three months in 1998 for trying to fix
a domestic-violence case.
And then there was New Bedford City Councilor John Saunders.
In an amazing coincidence, Saunders took a $200 contribution from
Livingstone in 2002, just before acting Gov. Jane Swift appointed
Livingstone to the bench.
Livingstone got his judgeship the old-fashioned way. First he worked
at the State House., for Rep. Mike Flaherty, himself a future judge
and the father of both a court clerk and the wannabe mayor of Boston.
Then by sending contributions to the usual suspects, and I do mean
suspects.
Felon Finneran, who was convicted, got $300 from Livingstone. Ex-Sen.
Henri Rauschenbach, who was acquitted, grabbed $250. Rep. Jailbird
George Rogers, whose second, post-prison political career ended after
the cops confiscated hundreds of gay porn videos from his house in New
Bedford, received $600. U.S. Rep. Barney Frank took in $250.
Four words to always remember about Massachusetts state government:
Nothing on the level.
kwflatbed said: ↑
Livingstone got his judgeship the old-fashioned way. First he worked
at the State House., for Rep. Mike Flaherty, himself a future judge
and the father of both a court clerk and the wannabe mayor of Boston.
Then by sending contributions to the usual suspects, and I do mean
suspects.
Felon Finneran, who was convicted, got $300 from Livingstone. Ex-Sen.
Henri Rauschenbach, who was acquitted, grabbed $250. Rep. Jailbird
George Rogers, whose second, post-prison political career ended after
the cops confiscated hundreds of gay porn videos from his house in New
Bedford, received $600. U.S. Rep. Barney Frank took in $250.Click to
expand...
Not gay porn, CHILD PORN. Big difference. One's criminal...unless
you're golfing buddies with the DA and the charges get swept.
lawdog671
MassCops Member
"I don't think too many people who know me will tell you I'm a guy
driven by political patronage," he said. Bristol County Sheriff Thomas
M. Hodgson
This was a Sheriff saying this?? EVERYTHING they do is political...any
Joe Blow could do this job...well not anyone literally but maybe
someone who may have done this for a living before might have been
better suited...
Sheriff Hodgson defends hiring of former probate judge
By Brian Fraga
Standard-Times staff writer
January 31, 2009 6:00 AM
Bristol County Sheriff Thomas M. Hodgson this week defended his
decision to hire Michael J. Livingstone — the former probate judge who
retired last year amidst misconduct charges — as a "coordinator of
contract compliance."
"I spoke with him about the ethical issues and he was very candid with
me," the sheriff said, adding that he was satisfied with Mr.
Livingstone's explanation that he unknowingly violated judicial
administrative rules while he was a sitting judge at the Plymouth
Probate and Family Court.
Sheriff Hodgson hired Mr. Livingstone, 52, in October to monitor
contracts for the department's medical unit. In that position, which
pays a $39,000 annual salary, Mr. Livingstone is responsible for
managing the costs associated with providing inmates' medical care.
"He monitors to make sure there is full compliance with the contract
so that we're getting our medical services," Sheriff Hodgson said.
"His job is also to find ways to reduce our medical costs for hospital
runs and hospital stays."
Three months before hiring Mr. Livingstone, Sheriff Hodgson
acknowledged he was approached by local political figures such as
former state Sen. William Q. "Biff" MacLean Jr., City Councilor John
Saunders and former mayor Judge John Markey asking to keep the former
judge in mind for any job openings.
Sheriff Hodgson said he decided to offer Mr. Livingstone a job that
was created when the department split the director of medical
services' position, which was also responsible for community and
volunteer programs.
The sheriff said the move was not fueled by politics.
"I don't think too many people who know me will tell you I'm a guy
driven by political patronage," he said.
"If I can get a good bargain on a top-notch person, I'm going to take
it. Mike is a very talented guy. He's very bright. He's a hard worker.
I basically got him for a steal."
Mr. Livingstone, who has listed addresses in New Bedford, could not be
reached for comment Friday.
He stepped down from the bench last June after the Commission on
Judicial Conduct charged him with violating judicial ethics rules by
running a real estate business and collecting fees as an attorney even
while he was a judge.
The commission had also charged him with making a false statement in
an affidavit describing his involvement with High Low Properties in
New Bedford and illegally threatening to shut off a tenant's
utilities.
Mr. Livingstone apologized, saying he took full responsibility for his
actions and regretted creating an appearance of impropriety.
Former acting Gov. Jane Swift appointed him to the bench in December
2002. He was previously the legal counsel to the New Bedford City
Council and a city solicitor.
Mr. Livingstone also has been known for political connections. He has
made thousands of dollars in campaign contributions over the years to
local leaders such as former Sen. MacLean, Mr. Saunders, former
Bristol County District Attorney Paul F. Walsh Jr. and state Sen. Mark
C.W. Montigny.
In November, he contributed $250 to state Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill,
according to campaign finance records.
http://www.southcoasttoday.
Here are some of the tough talking Yankee Fathers who laughed at me
for way past too long I tried hard to talk to them when they raised a
stink about Livingstone and Hanlon
https://www.dotnews.com/2009/
https://archives.lib.state.ma.
Joe Ureneck
2 Marlowe St.
Dorchester Ma 02124
Phone: 857 350-0575
Email: jureneck@comcast.net
https://www.
Top Ten Worst Judges in Massachusetts
Sun, 02/18/2018 - 13:10 | JoeU
What makes a bad judge?: Won't follow the law, violates the
Constitution and runs a nefarious operation in the shadows.
What attributes contribute to being a bad judge?: Lack of moral
compass & principles, inability to comprehend.
The current list includes 1 top admin judge, 1 appellate judge, 3
superior court & 5 at the district/family court level.
We canvassed several thousand BayStaters to find the worst of the worst.
Thank you. Mike Franco, candidate for Massachusetts Governor's Council
The Top ten worst "sitting" MA judges are:
Worst MA Administrative Judges:
Angela Ordonez, Chief Justice Probate & Family
Worst MA Appellate Judges:
Edward McDonough, MA Appeals Court
Worst MA Superior Court Judges:
Richard Carey
Brian Davis
Kenneth Salinger
Worst MA District & Family Court Judges:
Megan Christopher
Mark Coven
Thomas Estes
William O'Grady
Bernadette Sabra
(Many more were nominated but they have since retired or were
forced off the bench.)
https://www.facebook.com/pg/
CONTACT INFO
Call +1 617-723-3237
m.me/TheFatherhoodCoalition
http://www.
MORE INFO
About
Please visit our web page at www.fatherhoodcoaltion.org.
Email us at support@fatherhoodcoaltion.org
categories
Nonprofit Organization
CPF Board
Mike Franco
Patricia Friedman
Doug George
Brian Hutchins
Wayne Jewett
Juan Maldonado
Patrick McCabe, Co-Chair
Jim Marques
Rich Mitchell
Joe Ureneck, Chair
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 16:33:58 -0400
Subject: The RCMP cab never claim that I didn't try to settle first CORRECT?
To: hb@hbjustice.com, newsdesk@independent.co.uk, tmarthey@prestonnj.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca,
Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov
On 12/15/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ethics-ethique ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 15:28:31 -0500
> Subject: Re: YO Hank Brennan I stand corrected it is Chris Bulger who
> can be found on page 58 of the document hereto attached
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> This will confirm that we have received your enquiry and it has been
> placed in a priority sequence.
> ******************************
> La présente confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre requête et qu'elle
> a été placée en ordre de priorité de réception.
>
> Thank you/Merci
>
> Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle
> Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> 73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101
> RCMP Mailstop #58/
> GRC Arrêt Postal #58
> Ottawa, Ontario
> K1A 0R2
>
> 1-866-206-0195 (off/bur)
>
> ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> "Strong Ethics, Strong Organization"
> « Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide »
>
> This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is
> loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be
> reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the
> originator."
>
> « Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis
> en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié
> ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »
>
>
>
> On 12/15/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Jensen, Jan"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 19:31:16 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Hank Brennan and Robert Goldstein I
>> just called and left a message about Whitey Bulger and the FBI
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be away from the office and not returning until Tuesday
>> December 18th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please
>> contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 19:30:58 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Hank Brennan and Robert Goldstein I
>> just called and left a message about Whitey Bulger and the FBI
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: ethics-ethique ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:22:30 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Re My many calls to the Calgary Police Dept about their
>> client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> This will confirm that we have received your enquiry and it has been
>> placed in a priority sequence.
>> ******************************
>> La présente confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre requête et qu'elle
>> a été placée en ordre de priorité de réception.
>>
>> Thank you/Merci
>>
>> Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle
>> Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada
>> 73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101
>> RCMP Mailstop #58/
>> GRC Arrêt Postal #58
>> Ottawa, Ontario
>> K1A 0R2
>>
>> 1-866-206-0195 (off/bur)
>>
>> ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> "Strong Ethics, Strong Organization"
>> « Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide »
>>
>> This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is
>> loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be
>> reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the
>> originator."
>>
>> « Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis
>> en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié
>> ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:25:46 -0400
>> Subject: YO "Misandry Today" your pal "Thomas" or anyone else can go
>> to the 52 minute mark of this hearing held about 2 weeks before Barry
>> Winters was finally arrested and listen to me mention Patrick Doran's
>> malicous work within Encylopedia Dramatic
>> To: Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1
>> <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, thomas <thomas@1000notes.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor
>> <themayor@calgary.ca>
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> Then his fellow Trolls should check Doran's work in ED
>>
>> https://encyclopediadramatica.
>>
>> Nobody can deny that he provides the entire text of my lawsuit srcoll
>> down to Paragraph 75 to reqd the following statement AGAIN Do you not
>> see Doran and Wnters named???
>>
>>
>>
>> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
>> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
>> have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
>> supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
>> Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
>> “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
>> The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
>> cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
>> because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
>> corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
>> several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
>> the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
>> Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
>> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
>> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
>> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
>> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
>> on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
>> legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
>> Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
>> several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
>> the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
>> and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
>> from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
>> others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
>> A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
>> Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
>> Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
>> who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
>> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
>> were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
>> to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
>> nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
>> continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
>> slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
>> Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
>> Winters and his blogs.
>>
>>
>> BTW the DavidRayAmos Troll attacking using my name is not me. I was
>> not aware of Doran in ED until Barry Winters blogged about it
>>
>> I suspect it was the same Troll who created the ED webpage that you
>> used to source your bullshit about me from
>>
>> The reason I CC'd the universe and many cops in particular is because
>> I am filing a lawsuit about the shit.
>>
>> In a nutshell Doran is a shill for the Calgary cops Get it yet?
>>
>> On 3/31/18, Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> David,
>>>
>>> Thank you for directing your email to me specifically so I can respond.
>>>
>>> Please do not take my lack of response to your prior emails as a form of
>>> disrespect, its not. However, after reading your prior emails, I was
>>> unable
>>> to decipher who your message was specifically directed it.
>>>
>>> Was there something specific you wanted to discuss? Or were you just
>>> notifying me on the links and info included in this most recent email?
>>>
>>> Also, is there a reason the known universe is CC'd?
>>>
>>> Again, I'm not being disrespectful, but I know very little about you and
>>> your history with Patrick Doran, other than there was some sort of feud.
>>>
>>> Can you provide me some history and context?
>>>
>>> Respectfully,
>>> DDJ
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:37 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>> email-suit.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Saturday, 31 March 2018
>>>> Yo "Misandry Today" does this email suit a noname Yankee paralegal's
>>>> demand of me that he quickly deleted?
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LEGALLY PWNED: MISANDRY TODAY (DDJ)
>>>> 99 views
>>>> 15 1 Share
>>>>
>>>> Mad Shangi
>>>> Published on Mar 29, 2018
>>>>
>>>>
>> etc etc etc
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> The DDJ Drama Stream Extravaganza #DramaLivesMatter
>> 962 views
>> 79
>> 7
>> Share
>> Save
>> Cognitive Thought
>> Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018
>> DDJ has a Yes and No answer to a basic principle and conflates it with
>> an assumed argument.
>>
>> If you like what you see, please Subscribe! (:
>>
>> ⚙Support My Work⚙
>> Streamlabs: https://streamlabs.com/
>> PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/
>> Maker Support: https://www.makersupport.com/
>> Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/
>> Merchandise: http://tee.pub/lic/ZH_vh4ESxHg
>>
>> ⚙Social Media⚙
>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/anonymous_
>> BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/
>> Minds: https://www.minds.com/
>> Gab: https://gab.ai/Cog_Thought
>> Discord: https://discord.gg/ryrKPCR
>>
>> ⚙Patrons⚙
>> Scott Mraz: https://www.youtube.com/c/
>> DerWeisePanda: https://twitter.com/
>> Joseph Yhu: http://www.twitter.com/
>> Bearing: https://www.youtube.com/
>> Olenska: https://twitter.com/
>> CatherineAquitaine: https://www.minds.com/
>> Sheepalicious: https://twitter.com/
>> Shareyourworldwide: https://minds.com/
>> Joseph Palka: https://www.youtube.com/user/
>> Deodora Langerrud: https://www.facebook.com/
>> BobTheTrollKing: https://www.youtube.com/
>> The Gayest Person on Patreon: https://www.youtube.com/
>> Hoody: https://twitter.com/HoodyGeek
>> ShortBusMooner: https://twitter.com/
>> Chrome Fotter: https://www.youtube.com/
>> Occam's Razor: https://www.youtube.com/
>> A Very Dead Horse: https://www.youtube.com/
>> Thomas Schnadelbach
>> GarbageHumanTJM64
>> Clackston Biaar
>> Drauka Grissa
>> Paulie J
>> Debra J O'Connor
>> Static Citizen
>> Robert Etgeton III
>> Matt Studwell
>> Agent_R_Patriarchy
>> David Berryman
>> (To all my Patrons without links, let me know what social link you'd like
>> here.)
>>
>> Thank you all for your support!
>>
>> More than anything though, whatever you do with your day, enjoy yourself.
>> (:
>> Category
>> People & Blogs
>> 14 Comments
>> David Amos
>> Add a public comment...
>> David Amos
>> David Amos
>> 8 months ago
>> Clearly by your own words you perverts know that I contacted the cops
>> in Canada, the USA and the UK about your slander and criminal libel.
>> Please do go ahead and study my blog and discuss it on one of your oh
>> so informative livestreams. Trust that you will find this comment at
>> the top of this blog in a heartbeat along with some selected comments
>> from your live chat last night while your discussion bored me enough
>> to send me to la la land.
>>
>> Feel free to check my work about YOUR obvious malice towards me.
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> That said. I have no false illusions about justice. However I also
>> know I can make you perverts rather infamous as I bust ya in front of
>> your friends. We all know the corrupt cops in the UK who are more
>> concerned about Nazi Pugs will never act within the scope of their
>> employment just like the RCMP and the FBI never did. Everybody knows
>> its because of my lawsuits in the USA and Canada. However the RCMP
>> and I have been at war since 1982 when Coggy Baby was no doubt
>> shitting yellow.
>>
>> My contact info is always on the bottom of the lawsuits and made
>> public by the courts. Hence I have no problem whatsoever telling the
>> world who I am in a sick little Troll's YouTube channel that may go
>> "Poof" tomorrow if I decide to pick up the phone contact Google's
>> lawyers personally. If you dummies had bothered to notice I sent their
>> top lawyer in the USA and Canada the same email the "Thomas"
>> chickenshit makes fun of.
>>
>> What if I decide to waste some more of precious time on Trolls and
>> figure out who you are? What id I then "dox" you dudes and DDJ as
>> well on the Internet before I name you all within a paragraph or two
>> in my next lawsuit against the Crown? If you had bothered to read
>> paragraph 75 of a lawsuit NOT about cows (Federal Court File No
>> T-1557-15) you would have seen that I did it with Patty Baby Doran
>> and his butt buddy Barry Winters in 2015. Correct? My my won't that be
>> fun for the RCMP and their shills when I do it again particularly
>> after Barry Winters was arrested and then purportedly shit the bed
>> last year?
>>
>> Please feel free to tell us more in your next livestream just how much
>> fun you perverted Trolls are still having with me. Rest assured that
>> I will save every word.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 5 Campbell St
>> Apohaqui, NB
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Never forget that you nasty noname little bastards picked this fight with
>> me.
>> Ragnok Ulfbhert
>> Ragnok Ulfbhert
>> 8 months ago (edited)
>> The "Somewhere in the pooblic space" over the rainbow spoof has to be
>> a song Cog. It will be glorious lol
>> 4
>> Saoirse
>> Saoirse
>> 8 months ago
>> See I knew there was a reason I found myself wide awake at 4 am. I
>> have a 2 and a half hour podcast to catch up on.
>> 3
>> Admiral Thunderbunny
>> Admiral Thunderbunny
>> 8 months ago
>> Can't we just agree that DDJ is just a:
>>
>> Transitional
>> Amalgamation of
>> Recycled
>> Detritus
>> 3
>> The Badman
>> The Badman
>> 8 months ago
>> Ddj is a grandad probably in his 50s just so you know cog
>> 2
>> John Brown
>> John Brown
>> 8 months ago
>> Grandpas don't behave the way he does. Absolutely not.
>> Mad Shangi
>> Mad Shangi
>> 8 months ago
>> DDJ exposed for breaking the law.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> MGTOW REVEALED
>> MGTOW REVEALED
>> 8 months ago
>> Turd flinging monkey just got terminated for community guidelines.
>> Celestina Monkey and Misandry Today DDJ is next :) All MGTOWS are
>> going down, MGTOW is cancer, worse than feminism. Good riddance.
>> 1
>> The Badman
>> The Badman
>> 8 months ago
>> Did Katherine lamp show up? What happened I musta missed a stream
>> 1
>> CaptainAwesomesworld
>> CaptainAwesomesworld
>> 8 months ago
>> The Badman dollars to doughnuts kat lamp is a ddj sock puppet
>> 1
>> The Badman
>> The Badman
>> 8 months ago
>> nah, she was on his just a stream stream, she is just a senile looney old
>> bag.
>> John Brown
>> John Brown
>> 8 months ago
>> Hey Cog, you should know that DDJ has said multiple times that he's an
>> orphan. Doesn't that count as coming from a broken home? Oh wait, his
>> statements don't apply to him, my bad.
>> Mad Shangi
>> Mad Shangi
>> 8 months ago
>> You might appreciate this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>>
>> Live chat replay is on. Messages that appeared when the stream was
>> live will show up here.
>> David Amos
>> Are Coggy and Patty Baby having a bad day? Say Hoka Hey to your cop
>> pals for me will ya?
>> David Amos
>> You should know Patty Baby Everybody with two clues between their
>> ears must have figured out that you are a shill for the corrupt
>> Calgary cops
>> David Amos
>> That why Barry Winters got arrested but you did not Correct?
>> David Amos
>> You tell these fools I sued about cows and they believe you? Too too
>> funny indeed
>> David Amos
>> Perhaps your pals should read paragraph 75 of the lawsuit they make
>> fun of to see what is said of Trolls and the names of Patty Baby Doran
>> and Barry Winters EH?
>> lennon 41
>> WE THE CHAT
>> Doku HL SD
>> #CowGang
>> lennon 41
>> RESERVE THE RIGHT
>> Mad Shangi
>> Is he insinuating that people who are commenting on his videos now
>> are part of a conspiracy?!
>> Doku HL SD
>> the age of man is over the age of cow is now
>> Jorge mackensen
>> Get your cowsuits and tin foil hat on, we're gonna stalk some cows
>> today......
>> Unholy Mole
>> the cownt down to destruction
>> Nightbot
>> ⚙Support The Channel⚙ https://streamlabs.com/
>> DataWasteland
>> AND MILK IT FOR ALL ITS WORTH
>> Doku HL SD
>> madox cow disease
>> lennon 41
>> FUCKIN NORMIES
>> Jacob gulf city Navo
>> I want to punch ddj in the face
>> DataWasteland
>> IRRITABLE BULL SYNDROME
>> Doku HL SD
>> cownflicting arguments
>> Jimmie The Rustle
>> I don't think DDJ is observing the same reality as the rest of us.
>> lennon 41
>> TOWER 7 THAT HOE
>> Toothless Cowboy
>> Inifinte Bull Shite #MADoxcow ?
>> Doku HL SD
>> #MADoxcow
>> Doku HL SD
>> cow gang is on the rise
>> DataWasteland
>> ITS THE NEW MOOOOVMENT
>> Jacob gulf city Navo
>> Olenska I’m going to bed goodnight
>> Doku HL SD
>> MOOOOOO
>> Mad Shangi
>> Something tells me this April 1st conversation ain't happening. LOL!
>> Doku HL SD
>> MOOOOOOvement
>> Mad Shangi
>> He's got a bitch made voice.
>> Jorge mackensen
>> DDQ= Drama Dairy Queen
>> Doku HL SD
>> moooooove up dat drama
>> Doku HL SD
>> we're all from broken pastures
>> CThomas The Peasant
>> @Olenska Did I miss much of the (((autism)))?
>> Nightbot
>> ⚙Support The Channel⚙ https://streamlabs.com/
>> Doku HL SD
>> 🐄🐄🐄🐄🐄
>> Mad Shangi
>> Traumatic like the way his kids got fondled by his ex's boyfriend?
>> CThomas The Peasant
>> @Olenska Is it Moo-ving?
>> Jorge mackensen
>> I'm disturbed by the amount of Udders on the DDQ show mooooooooooooo🐮
>> CThomas The Peasant
>> @Olenska So I've herd
>> Doku HL SD
>> we have a cow gang problem on the internet we need a new moovement to
>> combats its
>> Catherine Aquitaine
>> Hello everyone!
>> Mad Shangi
>> I think @David Amos gave up on us. LOL!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:47:21 -0400
>> Subject: Re My many calls to the City of Calgary this week about the
>> Calgary Police Dept their client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
>> To: themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, city.manager@calgary.ca,
>> lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca, Glenda.Cole@calgary.ca,
>> Shannon.Belvedere@calgary.ca, Brian.Graham@calgary.ca,
>> David.Lewis@calgary.ca, David.Mercer@calgary.ca,
>> Stephen.Wheeler@calgary.ca, Douglas.Merchant@calgary.ca, mike lokken
>> <mike.lokken@albertaicenorth.
>> <Mike.Lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, cps
>> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol9600@calgarypolice.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Nobody should deny the fact that I tried to reason with you people for
>> ten long years.
>>
>> Yesterday I had heard enough from people playing dumb.
>>
>> Here is the email I promised to send to your lawyers
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:16:30 -0400
>> Subject: Re: DDJ's Inferno: Responding to MadShangi's Campaign of
>> Harassment
>> To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, patrick_doran1
>> <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
>> "Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> <philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
>> <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
>> eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> Scorched Earth = Butt Hurt
>> 59 views
>> Mad Shangi
>> Published on Mar 12, 2018
>> What happens when you trigger a sex-doll peddlin' fake MGTOW? Well,
>> you get doxxed of course.
>>
>> On 3/12/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> DDJ's Inferno: Responding to MadShangi's Campaign of Harassment
>>> 2,412 views
>>> Misandry Today
>>> Published on Mar 11, 2018
>>>
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:24:02 -0400
>> Subject: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt Cops and their
>> clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in BC, Dean Roger
>> Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran in Alberta, Encyclopedia Dramatica,
>> the Baconfat Legacy etc and Section 300 of the Canadian Crimial Code
>> To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
>> "philip.bryden"<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
>> <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
>> <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
>> "bill.clark"<bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> <Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> "Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
>> <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> danadurnford <danadurnford@hotmail.com>, Dean Ray
>> <deanrogerray@hotmail.com>, maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>,
>> xtofury <xtofury@gmail.com>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
>> "don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, smcintyre
>> <smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
>> "david.eby.mla"<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, pol7163
>> <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, police <police@halifax.ca>, oldmaison
>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, police <police@fredericton.ca>, andre
>> <andre@jafaust.com>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <grcanning@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER
>> <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
>> <premier@ontario.ca>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "bill.pentney"
>> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
>> mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
>> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>>
>> https://encyclopediadramatica.
>>
>> http://baconfatlegacy.
>>
>> The Baconfat Legacy
>>
>> Blog Archive
>> • ▼ 2018 (1)
>> o ▼ January (1)
>> Glen Canning: Exploiter of Rehtaeh Parsons
>> • ▼ 2017 (11)
>> o ▼ December (1)
>> Disturbed Troll Glen Canning Leaves Even More Angr...
>> o ▼ October (10)
>> The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Am...
>> The New Baconfat Mission Statement
>> Archive: Glen Canning and Leah Parsons on Stage
>> Butt-Hurt Troll Glen Canning Posts A Comment
>> The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos (1980's s...
>> The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos
>> The Musical PWNage of Glen Canning
>> RIP BARRY WINTERS: Don't Let Free Speech Die With ...
>> Glen Canning: Psychopath
>> Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
>>
>>
>> Tuesday, 24 October 2017
>>
>> Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
>>
>> Welcome to The Baconfat Legacy - started in tribute to Mr. Barry
>> Winters: a controversial blogger, opinionated troll and Edmonton
>> resident, who sadly passed away. Before his passing, his blog was the
>> subject of hate crime charges due to the offensive politically
>> incorrect nature of Barry's writing. I will continue this blog in that
>> tradition. You are going to read words like "faggot,""nigger,"
>> "kike,""spick,""nip,""bitch,""cunt,""whore,""slut,""wop,"
>> "midget," and anything else that just happens to pop into my head,
>> because like Barry I'm an equal opportunity offender. And if you don't
>> like the aggressive, in your face, deliberately offensive nature of
>> this blog well you can suck my fucking dick. Go tell David Amos and
>> Glen Canning to go fuck themselves too. Alert your local authorities
>> and go bitch to your friends in the government, because the Baconfat
>> is back baby.
>>
>> And in the interest of free speech I hope you fuckers try to shut me
>> down, because I will fight you. If you don't like this blog, then
>> don't read it. Go read the fucking Babysitter's Club for all I care.
>> But any bullshit trumped up charges you throw at me will make my day.
>> Because the day we start locking people up for talking shit in a
>> fucking blog, is the day that fascism rules. C'yall in court,
>> motherfuckers.
>>
>> Posted by Mad Shangi at 00:24
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.canadianlawlist.
>>
>> Glenda E. Cole
>> City Solicitor
>> Called to the bar: 1988 (AB); Q.C.2013 (AB)
>> Phone: 403-268-5182
>>
>>
>> City Solicitor's Office
>> Law Dept., 12th Flr., 800 Macleod Trail S.E.
>> PO Box 2100, Stn. M
>> Calgary, Alberta T2P 2M5
>> Phone: 403-268-2441
>> Fax: 403-268-4634
>>
>> Email: lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca
>>
>> Listed Individuals
>> Shannon C. Belvedere
>> Mary Ann Bendfeld
>> Jocelyn J. Caldwell
>> Glenda E. Cole
>> C. Tat Fan
>> Jill S. Floen
>> James T. Floyd
>> Paul Frank
>> Leila J. Gosselin
>> Brian C. Graham
>> Andrea Hankins-Palmer
>> Amanda Hart
>> T. E. Haufe
>> B. R. Inlow
>> Denise C. Jakal
>> Lori L. Kerr
>> My-Le Lai
>> David J. Lewis
>> Richard Loomer
>> Lesia Luciuk
>> Ola Malik
>> David E. Mercer
>> Douglas D. Merchant
>> Hanna Oh
>> Lise Olsen
>> Carol L. Reesor
>> Marnie B. Rusen
>> Colleen N. Sinclair
>> Tina Squire
>> R. Shawn Swinn
>> Stephen B. Wheeler
>> Trudy Wobeser
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> Friday, 18 September 2015
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>>
>> Court File No. T-1557-15
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
>>
>>
>>
>> 72. The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary,
>> Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the
>> Plaintiff ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had
>> researched Byron Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of
>> Justice in late 2006 has not been made public. More importantly the
>> lawyer who has been the MP representing Fundy Royal for the past
>> eleven years and that the former Minister of Public Safety
>> acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about Byron Prior that
>> contained the entire text of his website before the writ was dropped
>> for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email exchange
>> has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on the
>> Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed.
>> The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find
>> published on the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman”
>> character named Max published within the YouTube domain. It was an
>> interview of Byron Prior as he was protesting on the grounds of the
>> House of Commons the day after the Prime Minister was found in
>> “Contempt of Parliament” and his most contemptuous minority mandate
>> became a matter of history. His majority mandate is history and the
>> Plaintiff seeks relief.
>>
>> 73. The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public
>> Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia
>> claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had
>> several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons
>> during 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the
>> Plaintiff but he does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the
>> same street as the Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is
>> being prosecuted by the Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It
>> is unlikely he would move far from the city soon. If the Crown wishes
>> to argue this complaint Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc should be
>> summoned to testify about what they know of this matter and of their
>> being illegally barred from parliament properties as well. Failing
>> that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of documentation
>> including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide byway of
>> digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the concerns
>> of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the
>> Plaintiff and many others.
>>
>> 74. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was
>> before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff
>> that she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and
>> while visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by
>> the RCMP and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert
>> area of Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency
>> offices of the Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded
>> her emails to and from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former
>> Premier and the office of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff
>> to support her. The Plaintiff introduced himself to all the
>> aforementioned parties in order to assist Robin Reid and they were
>> ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff discovered he could no longer
>> assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the actions of Neo Nazis who
>> supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP and many other law
>> enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well aware of the
>> reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people in any
>> fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis
>> are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown
>> but their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.
>>
>> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
>> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
>> have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
>> supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
>> Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
>> “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
>> The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
>> cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
>> because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
>> corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
>> several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
>> the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
>> Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
>> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
>> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
>> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
>> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
>> on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
>> legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
>> Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
>> several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
>> the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
>> and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
>> from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
>> others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
>> A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
>> Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
>> Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
>> who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
>> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
>> were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
>> to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
>> nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
>> continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
>> slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
>> Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
>> Winters and his blogs.
>>
>> 76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up
>> on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor
>> Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their
>> actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal
>> gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to
>> politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters
>> responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June
>> of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry
>> Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his
>> published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That
>> fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received
>> any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the
>> EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime
>> Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while
>> continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to
>> university students and anyone else who will listen to them
>> particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every
>> word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic
>> cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a
>> lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He
>> considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates
>> that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of
>> cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court
>> of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore
>> other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work
>> of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and
>> WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
>>
>> 77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the
>> EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking
>> him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and
>> to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the
>> anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the
>> questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of
>> Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the
>> law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations.
>>
>> 78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified
>> himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a
>> follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for
>> certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff
>> has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of
>> time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone
>> number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior.
>> The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable
>> fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss
>> the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and
>> the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA
>> and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know
>> that some programs allow cyb...
[Message clipped] View entire message
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2018 08:27:31 -0400
Subject: The RCMP and the FBI know Judge Sydney Hanlon has pile of
wiretap tapes and her buddy Mark Coven is the crooked Yankee judge who
ordered our home in Milton sold illegally in order to bust up my Clan
in a effort to try to stop me
To: hb@hbjustice.com, newsdesk@independent.co.uk,
tmarthey@prestonnj.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca,
steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
news@kingscorecord.com, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, stateofcorruptionnh1@gmail.com
djtjr@trumporg.com, jureneck@comcast.net,
support@fatherhoodcoaltion.org
ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca, Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
washington field washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov
Everybody and his dog knows that it was Janet Reno's evil buddy
Dorchester District Court Judge Sydney Hanlon who had me falsely
imprisoned 2004 and who issued the warrant for my arrest that is still
in effect to this very day
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Hanlon Part One
183 views
joeu02
Published on Apr 2, 2009
Part One
www.fatherhoodcoalition.org 617 SAD-DADS
Nomination hearing for Sydney Hanlon to the Massachusetts Appeals
Court. The nomination of Judge Hanlon, currently a district court
judge, was opposed by representatives of The Fatherhood Coalition
(Part 4[end], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12[end] and 13) because of her active
promotion of the domestic violence legal system. Dorchester District
Court under Judge Hanlon was one of three courts nationwide used as a
domestic violence court model/prototype by the US Justice Department.
The council also voted 4-3 to confirm the nomination of Laurie MacLeod
to be a judge at the Palmer district court (Part 11 and 12). Atty.
MacLeod's nomination. Two weeks earlier when the council's presiding
officer Lt. Gov. Murray closed the council meeting without a vote on
MacLeod she was expected to lose. The vote change came about because
one councilor opposed to MacLeod was absent due to a family death
while another councilor supporting MacLeod, absent at the previous
meeting, was in attendence. There are apparently no provisions to
prevent the manipulation of council votes in this way.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Interview with Quincy Distric Judge Mark Coven
25 views
Discovering the Law
Published on Jul 8, 2018
Quincy District Court Chief Justice Mark Coven addresses the opiod
epidemic and explains the role that specialty courts play in this
fight.
If aanyone bothered t read the documents I sent earlier our troubles
with the very corrupt Yankee justice system began with the very
corrupt Yankee Judge Paula Carey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
Chief Justice Paula Carey on her new role
526 views
MassLW
Published on Aug 14, 2013
Trial Court Chief Justice Paula M. Carey discusses the newly created
position she was appointed to fill and her overall approach to the
job.
Everybody knows it was former Plymouth County Probate and Family Court
Judge Michael J. Livingstone who attacked our beach house after I sued
Carey et al and before I ran for a seat Parliament in 2004
https://www.southcoasttoday.
http://www.southofboston.net/
https://www.masscops.com/
Surprise! Disgraced ex-judge best man for the job
By Howie Carr
Friday, January 30, 2009
What hiring freeze? There has been another nationwide search, and the
winner is disgraced ex-state judge and State House hack Michael
Livingstone.
Did someone say something about a state budgetary “crisis”?
You’ve read about Livingstone. Until last June, he was a probate and
family court judge in Plymouth County. Then he cut a deal with the
Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct, which dropped various
charges against him in return for his resignation.
The allegations included sending a threat to a Section 8 tenant,
secretly grabbing fees from former clients and claiming as income tax
deductions various business expenses relating to his allegedly closed
law practice.
A bent Massachusetts state judge. Stop me if you’ve heard this one before.
Livingstone resigned June 12. Then began the longest, most
nerve-wracking 148 days of his worthless layabout life. That was how
long it took him to wedge his snout back into the public trough.
His new employer is Bristol County Sheriff Tom Hodgson, a good guy.
Hodgson, a Republican, hired the bust-out judge as “coordinator of
contract compliance.” Livingstone is taking a huge pay cut, from his
$129,000 judicial pay to $39,197.25 a year. Boo-hoo.
You know how when judges are making their annual demand for a pay
hike, they always claim they could be making really, really big bucks
in the Dreaded Private Sector. It’s their little fantasy, and I’m
being kind. Livingstone is the reality. Without their robes, 99
percent of these hack judges would be starving to death, desperate to
make anything close to the $39,000 Livingstone is collecting.
A call was placed to Sheriff Hodgson about his new employee.
“I asked him what had happened,” the sheriff said, “and he told me
these were administrative charges, not criminal. He said he had gotten
a letter saying what he’d done was permitted, but that the commission
didn’t think so.”
And of course, the sheriff also got a few calls. One came from ex-Sen.
Biff MacLean, the caudillo of Bristol County, fined $512,000 on his
way out the door. The sheriff said he also heard from “Mayor Markey” -
that would be Judge Jack Markey of New Bedford, himself suspended
without pay from the bench for three months in 1998 for trying to fix
a domestic-violence case.
And then there was New Bedford City Councilor John Saunders.
In an amazing coincidence, Saunders took a $200 contribution from
Livingstone in 2002, just before acting Gov. Jane Swift appointed
Livingstone to the bench.
Livingstone got his judgeship the old-fashioned way. First he worked
at the State House., for Rep. Mike Flaherty, himself a future judge
and the father of both a court clerk and the wannabe mayor of Boston.
Then by sending contributions to the usual suspects, and I do mean
suspects.
Felon Finneran, who was convicted, got $300 from Livingstone. Ex-Sen.
Henri Rauschenbach, who was acquitted, grabbed $250. Rep. Jailbird
George Rogers, whose second, post-prison political career ended after
the cops confiscated hundreds of gay porn videos from his house in New
Bedford, received $600. U.S. Rep. Barney Frank took in $250.
Four words to always remember about Massachusetts state government:
Nothing on the level.
kwflatbed said: ↑
Livingstone got his judgeship the old-fashioned way. First he worked
at the State House., for Rep. Mike Flaherty, himself a future judge
and the father of both a court clerk and the wannabe mayor of Boston.
Then by sending contributions to the usual suspects, and I do mean
suspects.
Felon Finneran, who was convicted, got $300 from Livingstone. Ex-Sen.
Henri Rauschenbach, who was acquitted, grabbed $250. Rep. Jailbird
George Rogers, whose second, post-prison political career ended after
the cops confiscated hundreds of gay porn videos from his house in New
Bedford, received $600. U.S. Rep. Barney Frank took in $250.Click to
expand...
Not gay porn, CHILD PORN. Big difference. One's criminal...unless
you're golfing buddies with the DA and the charges get swept.
lawdog671
MassCops Member
"I don't think too many people who know me will tell you I'm a guy
driven by political patronage," he said. Bristol County Sheriff Thomas
M. Hodgson
This was a Sheriff saying this?? EVERYTHING they do is political...any
Joe Blow could do this job...well not anyone literally but maybe
someone who may have done this for a living before might have been
better suited...
Sheriff Hodgson defends hiring of former probate judge
By Brian Fraga
Standard-Times staff writer
January 31, 2009 6:00 AM
Bristol County Sheriff Thomas M. Hodgson this week defended his
decision to hire Michael J. Livingstone — the former probate judge who
retired last year amidst misconduct charges — as a "coordinator of
contract compliance."
"I spoke with him about the ethical issues and he was very candid with
me," the sheriff said, adding that he was satisfied with Mr.
Livingstone's explanation that he unknowingly violated judicial
administrative rules while he was a sitting judge at the Plymouth
Probate and Family Court.
Sheriff Hodgson hired Mr. Livingstone, 52, in October to monitor
contracts for the department's medical unit. In that position, which
pays a $39,000 annual salary, Mr. Livingstone is responsible for
managing the costs associated with providing inmates' medical care.
"He monitors to make sure there is full compliance with the contract
so that we're getting our medical services," Sheriff Hodgson said.
"His job is also to find ways to reduce our medical costs for hospital
runs and hospital stays."
Three months before hiring Mr. Livingstone, Sheriff Hodgson
acknowledged he was approached by local political figures such as
former state Sen. William Q. "Biff" MacLean Jr., City Councilor John
Saunders and former mayor Judge John Markey asking to keep the former
judge in mind for any job openings.
Sheriff Hodgson said he decided to offer Mr. Livingstone a job that
was created when the department split the director of medical
services' position, which was also responsible for community and
volunteer programs.
The sheriff said the move was not fueled by politics.
"I don't think too many people who know me will tell you I'm a guy
driven by political patronage," he said.
"If I can get a good bargain on a top-notch person, I'm going to take
it. Mike is a very talented guy. He's very bright. He's a hard worker.
I basically got him for a steal."
Mr. Livingstone, who has listed addresses in New Bedford, could not be
reached for comment Friday.
He stepped down from the bench last June after the Commission on
Judicial Conduct charged him with violating judicial ethics rules by
running a real estate business and collecting fees as an attorney even
while he was a judge.
The commission had also charged him with making a false statement in
an affidavit describing his involvement with High Low Properties in
New Bedford and illegally threatening to shut off a tenant's
utilities.
Mr. Livingstone apologized, saying he took full responsibility for his
actions and regretted creating an appearance of impropriety.
Former acting Gov. Jane Swift appointed him to the bench in December
2002. He was previously the legal counsel to the New Bedford City
Council and a city solicitor.
Mr. Livingstone also has been known for political connections. He has
made thousands of dollars in campaign contributions over the years to
local leaders such as former Sen. MacLean, Mr. Saunders, former
Bristol County District Attorney Paul F. Walsh Jr. and state Sen. Mark
C.W. Montigny.
In November, he contributed $250 to state Treasurer Timothy P. Cahill,
according to campaign finance records.
http://www.southcoasttoday.
Here are some of the tough talking Yankee Fathers who laughed at me
for way past too long I tried hard to talk to them when they raised a
stink about Livingstone and Hanlon
https://www.dotnews.com/2009/
https://archives.lib.state.ma.
Joe Ureneck
2 Marlowe St.
Dorchester Ma 02124
Phone: 857 350-0575
Email: jureneck@comcast.net
https://www.
Top Ten Worst Judges in Massachusetts
Sun, 02/18/2018 - 13:10 | JoeU
What makes a bad judge?: Won't follow the law, violates the
Constitution and runs a nefarious operation in the shadows.
What attributes contribute to being a bad judge?: Lack of moral
compass & principles, inability to comprehend.
The current list includes 1 top admin judge, 1 appellate judge, 3
superior court & 5 at the district/family court level.
We canvassed several thousand BayStaters to find the worst of the worst.
Thank you. Mike Franco, candidate for Massachusetts Governor's Council
The Top ten worst "sitting" MA judges are:
Worst MA Administrative Judges:
Angela Ordonez, Chief Justice Probate & Family
Worst MA Appellate Judges:
Edward McDonough, MA Appeals Court
Worst MA Superior Court Judges:
Richard Carey
Brian Davis
Kenneth Salinger
Worst MA District & Family Court Judges:
Megan Christopher
Mark Coven
Thomas Estes
William O'Grady
Bernadette Sabra
(Many more were nominated but they have since retired or were
forced off the bench.)
https://www.facebook.com/pg/
CONTACT INFO
Call +1 617-723-3237
m.me/TheFatherhoodCoalition
http://www.
MORE INFO
About
Please visit our web page at www.fatherhoodcoaltion.org.
Email us at support@fatherhoodcoaltion.org
categories
Nonprofit Organization
CPF Board
Mike Franco
Patricia Friedman
Doug George
Brian Hutchins
Wayne Jewett
Juan Maldonado
Patrick McCabe, Co-Chair
Jim Marques
Rich Mitchell
Joe Ureneck, Chair
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 16:33:58 -0400
Subject: The RCMP cab never claim that I didn't try to settle first CORRECT?
To: hb@hbjustice.com, newsdesk@independent.co.uk, tmarthey@prestonnj.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, news@kingscorecord.com, jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca,
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca,
Liliana.Longo@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov
On 12/15/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: ethics-ethique ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 15:28:31 -0500
> Subject: Re: YO Hank Brennan I stand corrected it is Chris Bulger who
> can be found on page 58 of the document hereto attached
> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> This will confirm that we have received your enquiry and it has been
> placed in a priority sequence.
> ******************************
> La présente confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre requête et qu'elle
> a été placée en ordre de priorité de réception.
>
> Thank you/Merci
>
> Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle
> Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada
> 73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101
> RCMP Mailstop #58/
> GRC Arrêt Postal #58
> Ottawa, Ontario
> K1A 0R2
>
> 1-866-206-0195 (off/bur)
>
> ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
> "Strong Ethics, Strong Organization"
> « Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide »
>
> This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is
> loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be
> reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the
> originator."
>
> « Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis
> en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié
> ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »
>
>
>
> On 12/15/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: "Jensen, Jan"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>
>> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 19:31:16 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Hank Brennan and Robert Goldstein I
>> just called and left a message about Whitey Bulger and the FBI
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> I will be away from the office and not returning until Tuesday
>> December 18th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please
>> contact my assistant at (902) 407 7461.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 19:30:58 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Hank Brennan and Robert Goldstein I
>> just called and left a message about Whitey Bulger and the FBI
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>
>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>
>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>
>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>
>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>> press releases.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: ethics-ethique ethics-ethique <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 00:22:30 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Re My many calls to the Calgary Police Dept about their
>> client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> This will confirm that we have received your enquiry and it has been
>> placed in a priority sequence.
>> ******************************
>> La présente confirme que nous avons bien reçu votre requête et qu'elle
>> a été placée en ordre de priorité de réception.
>>
>> Thank you/Merci
>>
>> Professional Ethics Office / Bureau de l'éthique professionelle
>> Royal Canadian Mounted Police / Gendarmerie royale du Canada
>> 73 Leikin Dr., M5-3-101
>> RCMP Mailstop #58/
>> GRC Arrêt Postal #58
>> Ottawa, Ontario
>> K1A 0R2
>>
>> 1-866-206-0195 (off/bur)
>>
>> ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>
>> "Strong Ethics, Strong Organization"
>> « Une éthique solide pour une organisation solide »
>>
>> This document is the property of the Government of Canada. It is
>> loaned, in confidence, to your agency only and is not to be
>> reclassified or further disseminated without the consent of the
>> originator."
>>
>> « Ce document appartient au gouvernement du Canada. Il n'est transmis
>> en confidence qu'à votre organisme et il ne doit pas être reclassifié
>> ou transmis à d'autres sans le consentement de l'expéditeur. »
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://archive.org/details/
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
>>> dudes are way past too late
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>>>
>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Merci ,
>>>
>>>
>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>
>>>
>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Mr. Amos,
>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>
>> Department of Justice
>>
>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well Please
>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob
>>>
>>> http://thedavidamosrant.
>>> ilian.html
>>>
>>>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/
>>>>
>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must
>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>>>> cards?
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>> 6
>>>>
>>>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/
>>>>
>>>> http://www.archive.org/
>>>>
>>>> http://archive.org/details/
>>>>
>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>>> United States Senate
>>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>>
>>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>>
>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>>> raised in the attached letter.
>>>>
>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap
>>>> tapes.
>>>>
>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>>>
>>>> Very truly yours,
>>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> Sunday, 19 November 2017
>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
>> The Supreme Court
>>
>> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.
>>
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>>
>> Amos v. Canada
>> Court (s) Database
>>
>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
>> Date
>>
>> 2017-10-30
>> Neutral citation
>>
>> 2017 FCA 213
>> File numbers
>>
>> A-48-16
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:
>>
>> THE COURT
>>
>>
>>
>> Date: 20171030
>>
>> Docket: A-48-16
>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213
>> CORAM:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>> Respondent on the cross-appeal
>> (and formally Appellant)
>> and
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>> Appellant on the cross-appeal
>> (and formerly Respondent)
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT
>>
>> I. Introduction
>>
>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
>> (Claim at para. 96).
>>
>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
>> Prothontary’s Order).
>>
>>
>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).
>>
>>
>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal.
>>
>>
>> II. Preliminary Matter
>>
>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
>> several judges but did not name those judges.
>>
>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
>> c. F-7:
>>
>>
>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
>> Appeal.
>> […]
>>
>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
>> […]
>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.
>>
>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
>> juges de la Cour fédérale.
>>
>>
>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that the
>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
>> section.
>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide
>> that:
>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
>> matière civile et pénale.
>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.
>>
>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
>> compétence en matière civile et pénale.
>>
>>
>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
>> appeal book.
>>
>>
>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
>> conflict in any matter related to him.
>>
>>
>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.
>>
>>
>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
>> such judge had a conflict.
>>
>>
>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
>> was a member of such firm.
>>
>>
>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago.
>>
>>
>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
>> apprehension of bias:
>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
>> reasonable apprehension of bias:
>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly."
>>
>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed
>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
>> (4th) 193).
>>
>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.
>>
>>
>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."
>>
>>
>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.
>>
>>
>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
>> his former firm for a considerable period of time.
>>
>>
>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
>> events from over a decade ago.
>> (emphasis added)
>>
>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
>> Webb hearing this appeal.
>>
>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.
>>
>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.
>>
>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.
>>
>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
>> to recuse himself.
>>
>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.
>>
>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.
>>
>>
>> III. Issue
>>
>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?
>>
>> IV. Analysis
>>
>> A. Standard of Review
>>
>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83).
>>
>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
>> interfere.
>>
>>
>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the
>> Prothonotary’s Order?
>>
>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:
>>
>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
>> (…)
>>
>>
>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
>> [footnotes omitted].
>>
>>
>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
>> para. 27).
>>
>>
>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:
>>
>>
>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:
>>
>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;
>>
>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and
>>
>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).
>>
>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).
>>
>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:
>>
>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
>> of process…
>>
>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).
>>
>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the
>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.
>>
>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
>> supporting a cause of action.
>>
>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).
>>
>> V. Conclusion
>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
>> without leave to amend.
>> "Wyman W. Webb"
>> J.A.
>> "David G. Near"
>> J.A.
>> "Mary J.L. Gleason"
>> J.A.
>>
>>
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
>>
>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
>> DOCKET:
>>
>> A-48-16
>>
>>
>>
>> STYLE OF CAUSE:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>>
>> PLACE OF HEARING:
>>
>> Fredericton,
>> New Brunswick
>>
>> DATE OF HEARING:
>>
>> May 24, 2017
>>
>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:
>>
>> WEBB J.A.
>> NEAR J.A.
>> GLEASON J.A.
>>
>> DATED:
>>
>> October 30, 2017
>>
>> APPEARANCES:
>> David Raymond Amos
>>
>>
>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
>> (on his own behalf)
>>
>> Jan Jensen
>>
>>
>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
>> Nathalie G. Drouin
>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada
>>
>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 17:25:46 -0400
>> Subject: YO "Misandry Today" your pal "Thomas" or anyone else can go
>> to the 52 minute mark of this hearing held about 2 weeks before Barry
>> Winters was finally arrested and listen to me mention Patrick Doran's
>> malicous work within Encylopedia Dramatic
>> To: Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com>, patrick_doran1
>> <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, thomas <thomas@1000notes.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor
>> <themayor@calgary.ca>
>>
>> https://archive.org/details/
>>
>> Then his fellow Trolls should check Doran's work in ED
>>
>> https://encyclopediadramatica.
>>
>> Nobody can deny that he provides the entire text of my lawsuit srcoll
>> down to Paragraph 75 to reqd the following statement AGAIN Do you not
>> see Doran and Wnters named???
>>
>>
>>
>> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
>> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
>> have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
>> supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
>> Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
>> “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
>> The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
>> cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
>> because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
>> corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
>> several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
>> the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
>> Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
>> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
>> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
>> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
>> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
>> on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
>> legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
>> Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
>> several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
>> the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
>> and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
>> from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
>> others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
>> A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
>> Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
>> Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
>> who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
>> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
>> were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
>> to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
>> nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
>> continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
>> slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
>> Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
>> Winters and his blogs.
>>
>>
>> BTW the DavidRayAmos Troll attacking using my name is not me. I was
>> not aware of Doran in ED until Barry Winters blogged about it
>>
>> I suspect it was the same Troll who created the ED webpage that you
>> used to source your bullshit about me from
>>
>> The reason I CC'd the universe and many cops in particular is because
>> I am filing a lawsuit about the shit.
>>
>> In a nutshell Doran is a shill for the Calgary cops Get it yet?
>>
>> On 3/31/18, Misandry Today <misandry.happens@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> David,
>>>
>>> Thank you for directing your email to me specifically so I can respond.
>>>
>>> Please do not take my lack of response to your prior emails as a form of
>>> disrespect, its not. However, after reading your prior emails, I was
>>> unable
>>> to decipher who your message was specifically directed it.
>>>
>>> Was there something specific you wanted to discuss? Or were you just
>>> notifying me on the links and info included in this most recent email?
>>>
>>> Also, is there a reason the known universe is CC'd?
>>>
>>> Again, I'm not being disrespectful, but I know very little about you and
>>> your history with Patrick Doran, other than there was some sort of feud.
>>>
>>> Can you provide me some history and context?
>>>
>>> Respectfully,
>>> DDJ
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:37 AM, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>>> email-suit.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Saturday, 31 March 2018
>>>> Yo "Misandry Today" does this email suit a noname Yankee paralegal's
>>>> demand of me that he quickly deleted?
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LEGALLY PWNED: MISANDRY TODAY (DDJ)
>>>> 99 views
>>>> 15 1 Share
>>>>
>>>> Mad Shangi
>>>> Published on Mar 29, 2018
>>>>
>>>>
>> etc etc etc
>>
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> The DDJ Drama Stream Extravaganza #DramaLivesMatter
>> 962 views
>> 79
>> 7
>> Share
>> Save
>> Cognitive Thought
>> Streamed live on Mar 27, 2018
>> DDJ has a Yes and No answer to a basic principle and conflates it with
>> an assumed argument.
>>
>> If you like what you see, please Subscribe! (:
>>
>> ⚙Support My Work⚙
>> Streamlabs: https://streamlabs.com/
>> PayPal: https://www.paypal.me/
>> Maker Support: https://www.makersupport.com/
>> Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/
>> Merchandise: http://tee.pub/lic/ZH_vh4ESxHg
>>
>> ⚙Social Media⚙
>> Twitter: https://twitter.com/anonymous_
>> BitChute: https://www.bitchute.com/
>> Minds: https://www.minds.com/
>> Gab: https://gab.ai/Cog_Thought
>> Discord: https://discord.gg/ryrKPCR
>>
>> ⚙Patrons⚙
>> Scott Mraz: https://www.youtube.com/c/
>> DerWeisePanda: https://twitter.com/
>> Joseph Yhu: http://www.twitter.com/
>> Bearing: https://www.youtube.com/
>> Olenska: https://twitter.com/
>> CatherineAquitaine: https://www.minds.com/
>> Sheepalicious: https://twitter.com/
>> Shareyourworldwide: https://minds.com/
>> Joseph Palka: https://www.youtube.com/user/
>> Deodora Langerrud: https://www.facebook.com/
>> BobTheTrollKing: https://www.youtube.com/
>> The Gayest Person on Patreon: https://www.youtube.com/
>> Hoody: https://twitter.com/HoodyGeek
>> ShortBusMooner: https://twitter.com/
>> Chrome Fotter: https://www.youtube.com/
>> Occam's Razor: https://www.youtube.com/
>> A Very Dead Horse: https://www.youtube.com/
>> Thomas Schnadelbach
>> GarbageHumanTJM64
>> Clackston Biaar
>> Drauka Grissa
>> Paulie J
>> Debra J O'Connor
>> Static Citizen
>> Robert Etgeton III
>> Matt Studwell
>> Agent_R_Patriarchy
>> David Berryman
>> (To all my Patrons without links, let me know what social link you'd like
>> here.)
>>
>> Thank you all for your support!
>>
>> More than anything though, whatever you do with your day, enjoy yourself.
>> (:
>> Category
>> People & Blogs
>> 14 Comments
>> David Amos
>> Add a public comment...
>> David Amos
>> David Amos
>> 8 months ago
>> Clearly by your own words you perverts know that I contacted the cops
>> in Canada, the USA and the UK about your slander and criminal libel.
>> Please do go ahead and study my blog and discuss it on one of your oh
>> so informative livestreams. Trust that you will find this comment at
>> the top of this blog in a heartbeat along with some selected comments
>> from your live chat last night while your discussion bored me enough
>> to send me to la la land.
>>
>> Feel free to check my work about YOUR obvious malice towards me.
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> That said. I have no false illusions about justice. However I also
>> know I can make you perverts rather infamous as I bust ya in front of
>> your friends. We all know the corrupt cops in the UK who are more
>> concerned about Nazi Pugs will never act within the scope of their
>> employment just like the RCMP and the FBI never did. Everybody knows
>> its because of my lawsuits in the USA and Canada. However the RCMP
>> and I have been at war since 1982 when Coggy Baby was no doubt
>> shitting yellow.
>>
>> My contact info is always on the bottom of the lawsuits and made
>> public by the courts. Hence I have no problem whatsoever telling the
>> world who I am in a sick little Troll's YouTube channel that may go
>> "Poof" tomorrow if I decide to pick up the phone contact Google's
>> lawyers personally. If you dummies had bothered to notice I sent their
>> top lawyer in the USA and Canada the same email the "Thomas"
>> chickenshit makes fun of.
>>
>> What if I decide to waste some more of precious time on Trolls and
>> figure out who you are? What id I then "dox" you dudes and DDJ as
>> well on the Internet before I name you all within a paragraph or two
>> in my next lawsuit against the Crown? If you had bothered to read
>> paragraph 75 of a lawsuit NOT about cows (Federal Court File No
>> T-1557-15) you would have seen that I did it with Patty Baby Doran
>> and his butt buddy Barry Winters in 2015. Correct? My my won't that be
>> fun for the RCMP and their shills when I do it again particularly
>> after Barry Winters was arrested and then purportedly shit the bed
>> last year?
>>
>> Please feel free to tell us more in your next livestream just how much
>> fun you perverted Trolls are still having with me. Rest assured that
>> I will save every word.
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 5 Campbell St
>> Apohaqui, NB
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Never forget that you nasty noname little bastards picked this fight with
>> me.
>> Ragnok Ulfbhert
>> Ragnok Ulfbhert
>> 8 months ago (edited)
>> The "Somewhere in the pooblic space" over the rainbow spoof has to be
>> a song Cog. It will be glorious lol
>> 4
>> Saoirse
>> Saoirse
>> 8 months ago
>> See I knew there was a reason I found myself wide awake at 4 am. I
>> have a 2 and a half hour podcast to catch up on.
>> 3
>> Admiral Thunderbunny
>> Admiral Thunderbunny
>> 8 months ago
>> Can't we just agree that DDJ is just a:
>>
>> Transitional
>> Amalgamation of
>> Recycled
>> Detritus
>> 3
>> The Badman
>> The Badman
>> 8 months ago
>> Ddj is a grandad probably in his 50s just so you know cog
>> 2
>> John Brown
>> John Brown
>> 8 months ago
>> Grandpas don't behave the way he does. Absolutely not.
>> Mad Shangi
>> Mad Shangi
>> 8 months ago
>> DDJ exposed for breaking the law.
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>> MGTOW REVEALED
>> MGTOW REVEALED
>> 8 months ago
>> Turd flinging monkey just got terminated for community guidelines.
>> Celestina Monkey and Misandry Today DDJ is next :) All MGTOWS are
>> going down, MGTOW is cancer, worse than feminism. Good riddance.
>> 1
>> The Badman
>> The Badman
>> 8 months ago
>> Did Katherine lamp show up? What happened I musta missed a stream
>> 1
>> CaptainAwesomesworld
>> CaptainAwesomesworld
>> 8 months ago
>> The Badman dollars to doughnuts kat lamp is a ddj sock puppet
>> 1
>> The Badman
>> The Badman
>> 8 months ago
>> nah, she was on his just a stream stream, she is just a senile looney old
>> bag.
>> John Brown
>> John Brown
>> 8 months ago
>> Hey Cog, you should know that DDJ has said multiple times that he's an
>> orphan. Doesn't that count as coming from a broken home? Oh wait, his
>> statements don't apply to him, my bad.
>> Mad Shangi
>> Mad Shangi
>> 8 months ago
>> You might appreciate this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>>
>> Live chat replay is on. Messages that appeared when the stream was
>> live will show up here.
>> David Amos
>> Are Coggy and Patty Baby having a bad day? Say Hoka Hey to your cop
>> pals for me will ya?
>> David Amos
>> You should know Patty Baby Everybody with two clues between their
>> ears must have figured out that you are a shill for the corrupt
>> Calgary cops
>> David Amos
>> That why Barry Winters got arrested but you did not Correct?
>> David Amos
>> You tell these fools I sued about cows and they believe you? Too too
>> funny indeed
>> David Amos
>> Perhaps your pals should read paragraph 75 of the lawsuit they make
>> fun of to see what is said of Trolls and the names of Patty Baby Doran
>> and Barry Winters EH?
>> lennon 41
>> WE THE CHAT
>> Doku HL SD
>> #CowGang
>> lennon 41
>> RESERVE THE RIGHT
>> Mad Shangi
>> Is he insinuating that people who are commenting on his videos now
>> are part of a conspiracy?!
>> Doku HL SD
>> the age of man is over the age of cow is now
>> Jorge mackensen
>> Get your cowsuits and tin foil hat on, we're gonna stalk some cows
>> today......
>> Unholy Mole
>> the cownt down to destruction
>> Nightbot
>> ⚙Support The Channel⚙ https://streamlabs.com/
>> DataWasteland
>> AND MILK IT FOR ALL ITS WORTH
>> Doku HL SD
>> madox cow disease
>> lennon 41
>> FUCKIN NORMIES
>> Jacob gulf city Navo
>> I want to punch ddj in the face
>> DataWasteland
>> IRRITABLE BULL SYNDROME
>> Doku HL SD
>> cownflicting arguments
>> Jimmie The Rustle
>> I don't think DDJ is observing the same reality as the rest of us.
>> lennon 41
>> TOWER 7 THAT HOE
>> Toothless Cowboy
>> Inifinte Bull Shite #MADoxcow ?
>> Doku HL SD
>> #MADoxcow
>> Doku HL SD
>> cow gang is on the rise
>> DataWasteland
>> ITS THE NEW MOOOOVMENT
>> Jacob gulf city Navo
>> Olenska I’m going to bed goodnight
>> Doku HL SD
>> MOOOOOO
>> Mad Shangi
>> Something tells me this April 1st conversation ain't happening. LOL!
>> Doku HL SD
>> MOOOOOOvement
>> Mad Shangi
>> He's got a bitch made voice.
>> Jorge mackensen
>> DDQ= Drama Dairy Queen
>> Doku HL SD
>> moooooove up dat drama
>> Doku HL SD
>> we're all from broken pastures
>> CThomas The Peasant
>> @Olenska Did I miss much of the (((autism)))?
>> Nightbot
>> ⚙Support The Channel⚙ https://streamlabs.com/
>> Doku HL SD
>> 🐄🐄🐄🐄🐄
>> Mad Shangi
>> Traumatic like the way his kids got fondled by his ex's boyfriend?
>> CThomas The Peasant
>> @Olenska Is it Moo-ving?
>> Jorge mackensen
>> I'm disturbed by the amount of Udders on the DDQ show mooooooooooooo🐮
>> CThomas The Peasant
>> @Olenska So I've herd
>> Doku HL SD
>> we have a cow gang problem on the internet we need a new moovement to
>> combats its
>> Catherine Aquitaine
>> Hello everyone!
>> Mad Shangi
>> I think @David Amos gave up on us. LOL!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 14:47:21 -0400
>> Subject: Re My many calls to the City of Calgary this week about the
>> Calgary Police Dept their client Partick Doran and his many cohorts
>> To: themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>, city.manager@calgary.ca,
>> lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca, Glenda.Cole@calgary.ca,
>> Shannon.Belvedere@calgary.ca, Brian.Graham@calgary.ca,
>> David.Lewis@calgary.ca, David.Mercer@calgary.ca,
>> Stephen.Wheeler@calgary.ca, Douglas.Merchant@calgary.ca, mike lokken
>> <mike.lokken@albertaicenorth.
>> <Mike.Lokken@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, pol7163 <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, cps
>> <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, pol9600@calgarypolice.ca
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> Nobody should deny the fact that I tried to reason with you people for
>> ten long years.
>>
>> Yesterday I had heard enough from people playing dumb.
>>
>> Here is the email I promised to send to your lawyers
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:16:30 -0400
>> Subject: Re: DDJ's Inferno: Responding to MadShangi's Campaign of
>> Harassment
>> To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, patrick_doran1
>> <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
>> "Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> <philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
>> <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
>> eachtem <eachtem@hotmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>
>> Scorched Earth = Butt Hurt
>> 59 views
>> Mad Shangi
>> Published on Mar 12, 2018
>> What happens when you trigger a sex-doll peddlin' fake MGTOW? Well,
>> you get doxxed of course.
>>
>> On 3/12/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?
>>>
>>> DDJ's Inferno: Responding to MadShangi's Campaign of Harassment
>>> 2,412 views
>>> Misandry Today
>>> Published on Mar 11, 2018
>>>
>>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2018 20:24:02 -0400
>> Subject: A reminder for Glen Canning, the Corrupt Cops and their
>> clients Arthur Topham, Dana Durnford and Alex Hunter in BC, Dean Roger
>> Ray, Eddy Atchem, Patty Baby Doran in Alberta, Encyclopedia Dramatica,
>> the Baconfat Legacy etc and Section 300 of the Canadian Crimial Code
>> To: cps <cps@calgarypolice.ca>, themayor <themayor@calgary.ca>,
>> "philip.bryden"<philip.bryden@gov.ab.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "Kathleen.Ganley"
>> <Kathleen.Ganley@assembly.ab.
>> <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, eps <eps@edmontonpolice.ca>,
>> "bill.clark"<bill.clark@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> <Cindy.Bruneau@edmonton.ca>, "Paul.Lynch"
>> <Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>
>> "Michelle.Boutin"<Michelle.Boutin@rcmp-grc.gc.
>> <ethics-ethique@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> danadurnford <danadurnford@hotmail.com>, Dean Ray
>> <deanrogerray@hotmail.com>, maryann4peace <maryann4peace@gmail.com>,
>> xtofury <xtofury@gmail.com>, "don.iveson"<don.iveson@edmonton.ca>,
>> "don.marshall"<don.marshall@edmonton.ca>, smcintyre
>> <smcintyre@sylvanlake.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>,
>> "david.eby.mla"<david.eby.mla@leg.bc.ca>, pol7163
>> <pol7163@calgarypolice.ca>, police <police@halifax.ca>, oldmaison
>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, police <police@fredericton.ca>, andre
>> <andre@jafaust.com>, patrick_doran1 <patrick_doran1@hotmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> <grcanning@gmail.com>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER
>> <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
>> <premier@ontario.ca>, glen <glen@glencanning.com>, "bill.pentney"
>> <bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>,
>> mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"
>> <Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>>
>> https://encyclopediadramatica.
>>
>> http://baconfatlegacy.
>>
>> The Baconfat Legacy
>>
>> Blog Archive
>> • ▼ 2018 (1)
>> o ▼ January (1)
>> Glen Canning: Exploiter of Rehtaeh Parsons
>> • ▼ 2017 (11)
>> o ▼ December (1)
>> Disturbed Troll Glen Canning Leaves Even More Angr...
>> o ▼ October (10)
>> The Mad Shangi Show "The Roast of David Raymond Am...
>> The New Baconfat Mission Statement
>> Archive: Glen Canning and Leah Parsons on Stage
>> Butt-Hurt Troll Glen Canning Posts A Comment
>> The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos (1980's s...
>> The Musical PWNage of David Raymond Amos
>> The Musical PWNage of Glen Canning
>> RIP BARRY WINTERS: Don't Let Free Speech Die With ...
>> Glen Canning: Psychopath
>> Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
>>
>>
>> Tuesday, 24 October 2017
>>
>> Welcome To The New Home Of The Baconfat Papers
>>
>> Welcome to The Baconfat Legacy - started in tribute to Mr. Barry
>> Winters: a controversial blogger, opinionated troll and Edmonton
>> resident, who sadly passed away. Before his passing, his blog was the
>> subject of hate crime charges due to the offensive politically
>> incorrect nature of Barry's writing. I will continue this blog in that
>> tradition. You are going to read words like "faggot,""nigger,"
>> "kike,""spick,""nip,""bitch,""cunt,""whore,""slut,""wop,"
>> "midget," and anything else that just happens to pop into my head,
>> because like Barry I'm an equal opportunity offender. And if you don't
>> like the aggressive, in your face, deliberately offensive nature of
>> this blog well you can suck my fucking dick. Go tell David Amos and
>> Glen Canning to go fuck themselves too. Alert your local authorities
>> and go bitch to your friends in the government, because the Baconfat
>> is back baby.
>>
>> And in the interest of free speech I hope you fuckers try to shut me
>> down, because I will fight you. If you don't like this blog, then
>> don't read it. Go read the fucking Babysitter's Club for all I care.
>> But any bullshit trumped up charges you throw at me will make my day.
>> Because the day we start locking people up for talking shit in a
>> fucking blog, is the day that fascism rules. C'yall in court,
>> motherfuckers.
>>
>> Posted by Mad Shangi at 00:24
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.canadianlawlist.
>>
>> Glenda E. Cole
>> City Solicitor
>> Called to the bar: 1988 (AB); Q.C.2013 (AB)
>> Phone: 403-268-5182
>>
>>
>> City Solicitor's Office
>> Law Dept., 12th Flr., 800 Macleod Trail S.E.
>> PO Box 2100, Stn. M
>> Calgary, Alberta T2P 2M5
>> Phone: 403-268-2441
>> Fax: 403-268-4634
>>
>> Email: lawdept@gov.calgary.ab.ca
>>
>> Listed Individuals
>> Shannon C. Belvedere
>> Mary Ann Bendfeld
>> Jocelyn J. Caldwell
>> Glenda E. Cole
>> C. Tat Fan
>> Jill S. Floen
>> James T. Floyd
>> Paul Frank
>> Leila J. Gosselin
>> Brian C. Graham
>> Andrea Hankins-Palmer
>> Amanda Hart
>> T. E. Haufe
>> B. R. Inlow
>> Denise C. Jakal
>> Lori L. Kerr
>> My-Le Lai
>> David J. Lewis
>> Richard Loomer
>> Lesia Luciuk
>> Ola Malik
>> David E. Mercer
>> Douglas D. Merchant
>> Hanna Oh
>> Lise Olsen
>> Carol L. Reesor
>> Marnie B. Rusen
>> Colleen N. Sinclair
>> Tina Squire
>> R. Shawn Swinn
>> Stephen B. Wheeler
>> Trudy Wobeser
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.
>>
>> Friday, 18 September 2015
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>>
>> Court File No. T-1557-15
>>
>> FEDERAL COURT
>>
>> BETWEEN:
>>
>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>
>>
>> Plaintiff
>>
>> and
>>
>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>
>>
>> Defendant
>>
>> STATEMENT OF CLAIM
>>
>>
>>
>> 72. The Plaintiff states that in early 2006 Saga Books of Calgary,
>> Alberta published a book about Byron Prior and the MP whom the
>> Plaintiff ran against in 2004 and hopefully again in 2014 had
>> researched Byron Prior’s matters. His report to the Minister of
>> Justice in late 2006 has not been made public. More importantly the
>> lawyer who has been the MP representing Fundy Royal for the past
>> eleven years and that the former Minister of Public Safety
>> acknowledged an email from the Plaintiff about Byron Prior that
>> contained the entire text of his website before the writ was dropped
>> for the election of the 38th Parliament. The aforesaid email exchange
>> has been published in the Internet for eleven years. Everything on the
>> Internet published by Byron Prior beginning in 2002 has been removed.
>> The last comments of Byron Prior that the Plaintiff could find
>> published on the Internet was within a few videos a “Freeman”
>> character named Max published within the YouTube domain. It was an
>> interview of Byron Prior as he was protesting on the grounds of the
>> House of Commons the day after the Prime Minister was found in
>> “Contempt of Parliament” and his most contemptuous minority mandate
>> became a matter of history. His majority mandate is history and the
>> Plaintiff seeks relief.
>>
>> 73. The Plaintiff states that he did see a comment posted in a public
>> Facebook of one of Byron Prior’s many associates in British Colombia
>> claiming that Byron Prior had been arrested in Ottawa in 2012 as had
>> several other of his associates across Canada for various reasons
>> during 2012. The whereabouts of Byron Prior are not known to the
>> Plaintiff but he does know that Charles Leblanc lives one block up the
>> same street as the Federal Court in Fredericton is located. Leblanc is
>> being prosecuted by the Crown and suing the FPF at the same time. It
>> is unlikely he would move far from the city soon. If the Crown wishes
>> to argue this complaint Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc should be
>> summoned to testify about what they know of this matter and of their
>> being illegally barred from parliament properties as well. Failing
>> that the Plaintiff has collected a large amount of documentation
>> including documents, videos and webpages etc. He can provide byway of
>> digital media much evidence for the Crown to review about the concerns
>> of Byron Prior and Charles Leblanc and their association with the
>> Plaintiff and many others.
>>
>> 74. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2009 while Byron Prior was
>> before the court a supporter of his, Robin Reid informed the Plaintiff
>> that she was barred from the legislative properties of Alberta and
>> while visiting a constituency office of a MP she had been arrested by
>> the RCMP and assaulted in a locked cell of a hospital in the St Albert
>> area of Alberta. Her arrest was after her visits to the constituency
>> offices of the Prime Minister and an Edmonton MLA. Ms. Reid forwarded
>> her emails to and from the Prime Minister’s office, the RCMP, a former
>> Premier and the office of the Sergeant-at-Arms and asked the Plaintiff
>> to support her. The Plaintiff introduced himself to all the
>> aforementioned parties in order to assist Robin Reid and they were
>> ignored for years. In 2012 the Plaintiff discovered he could no longer
>> assist Ms. Reid because she agreed with the actions of Neo Nazis who
>> supported Byron Prior and Werner Bock. The RCMP and many other law
>> enforcement authorities in Canada and the USA are well aware of the
>> reasons why the Plaintiff is not associated with such people in any
>> fashion other than to attack them with his written words. Neo Nazis
>> are not worthy of further mention in this complaint against the Crown
>> but their Zionist foe, Barry Winters is.
>>
>> 75. The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware of the libel,
>> sexual harassment, and death threats practiced against his family that
>> have been published on the Internet since 2005 by fans (Trolls) who
>> supported Byron Prior. Four Trolls who live in Alberta are Barry
>> Winters, Dean Roger Ray, Eddy Achtem and Patrick Doran They have many
>> “Anonymous” cohorts throughout Canada, the USA and the United Kingdom.
>> The actions of these Trolls created an important example of
>> cyberbullying. Law enforcement officials have ignored these Trolls
>> because of the Plaintiff’s standing as a whistleblower exposing
>> corruption within the justice system. The Plaintiff is aware that
>> several people complained about their actions over the years. In fact
>> the mother of Dean Roger Ray recently her indignation in Barry
>> Winter’s blog. Complaints about Barry Winters can be seen on the
>> Internet by Glen Canning and Professor Kris Wells, two politically
>> well-connected people who complain of cyberbullying often. Proof the
>> Edmonton Police Force (EPS), RCMP, FBI and police in the UK have been
>> ignoring the Plaintiff’s complaints about these Trolls can also viewed
>> on the Internet. The Plaintiff fought fire with fire but did so in a
>> legal fashion and kept the police fully informed of his actions. The
>> Plaintiff was successful in causing numerous egregious videos and
>> several blogs to be taken down after doing his best to find out who
>> the “Anonymous” people were and reporting them. He saved all the blogs
>> and videos published about his family before the malice was removed
>> from public view. Three Trolls who continue to attack his family and
>> others are Dean Roger Ray, Barry Winters and one government employee.
>> A member of the legal dept. of Edmonton tried to claim that the
>> Plaintiff was Barry Winters then complained to the EPS about the
>> Plaintiff’s questions about her incompetence. Professor Kris Wells,
>> who was associated with the Police Commission of Edmonton and Glen
>> Canning, who lost his daughter to cyberbullying, said nothing. They
>> were content that the Plaintiff managed to convince Google’s lawyers
>> to remove one of Barry Winters’s blogs on October 23, 2014 and say
>> nothing about his blog within WordPress that the Troll uses to
>> continue his libel of them and their friends. Instead Glen Canning
>> slandered the Plaintiff within Twitter after Kris Wells sent the
>> Plaintiff an email stating his lawyer had advised him to ignore Barry
>> Winters and his blogs.
>>
>> 76. The Plaintiff states that since the fall of 2014 he has given up
>> on the notion that any police officer or Glen Canning and Professor
>> Kris Wells would ever act with any semblance of integrity. All their
>> actions appear to be for the purposes of self-promotion and personal
>> gain. Canning and Wells received the same emails that were sent to
>> politicians and law enforcement authorities and only Barry Winters
>> responded to all and disputed the Plaintiff’s words. The EPS in June
>> of 2015 informed the Plaintiff that they intend to prosecute Barry
>> Winters for sending “False Messages” instead of prosecuting for his
>> published malice under Sections 300 and 319 of the Criminal Code. That
>> fact must be true because since June the Plaintiff has not received
>> any emails from Barry Winters and within his blog he has slandered the
>> EPS and often mentions the topic of “False Messages”. In the meantime
>> Canning and Wells ignore the Plaintiff’s common concerns while
>> continuing to profess of their abundant knowledge of bullying to
>> university students and anyone else who will listen to them
>> particularly members of the corporate media. The Plaintiff saves every
>> word of Canning and Wells that they cause to be published on the topic
>> cyberbullying and plans to file them as his exhibits to support a
>> lawsuit to seek relief from the cyberbullying of his Clan. He
>> considers the blogs of Barry Winters and the videos of his associates
>> that remain published on the Internet to be important evidence of
>> cyberbullying that the Crown will be arguing within a provincial court
>> of his choice after the election of the 42nd Parliament. Therefore
>> other than remind the Crown and others that he is recording the work
>> of the Trolls, he has not reported their malice to Google and
>> WordPress anymore because the RCMP should have done so long ago.
>>
>> 77. The Plaintiff states that in June of 2015 when a member of the
>> EPS called him four times with an anonymous telephone number asking
>> him to stop emailing public officials about Barry Winters’s blog and
>> to file a formal complaint. The Plaintiff was offended by the
>> anonymous talk of “False Messages”. He refused and stated that if the
>> questionable public officials found his emails quoting the blog of
>> Barry Winters upsetting then the EPS and the RCMP should uphold the
>> law and do something about it in order to protect their reputations.
>>
>> 78. The Plaintiff states that until the EPS member clearly identified
>> himself with his badge number in the fourth phone call and sent a
>> follow up email to back up his words, the Plaintiff could not know for
>> certain that a Troll or the EPS had been calling him. The Plaintiff
>> has a record of two fraudulent calls to him during the same period of
>> time, one using an RCMP phone number and the other used the phone
>> number of Dana Durnford, a well-known Troll and friend of Byron Prior.
>> The Plaintiff returned the calls. Dana Durnford in a predictable
>> fashion denied knowing him and hung up but the Plaintiff did discuss
>> the malice of Trolls with an ethical member of the RCMP. The RCMP and
>> the FBI know that anyone can access several websites based in the USA
>> and engage their free services to harass people with. The RCMP know
>> that some programs allow cyb...
[Message clipped] View entire message
https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/31/us/james-whitey-bulger/index.html
Whitey Bulger met a violent end after a lifetime of brutality
McGonagle was the leader of a gang that was a rival to reputed Irish mobster boss James "Whitey" Bulger's Winter Hill Gang. Bulger was suspected of being involved in McGonagle's death in 1974, and in 18 other mob-related killings between1973 and 1985.
Whenever Bulger drove by the shallow grave, he would say "Drink up, Paulie," a witness testified at Bulger's trial in 2013. A federal jury convicted Bulger of 31 counts that year, including racketeering and extortion, and found him culpable in 11 killings, including McGonagle's death.
Bulger, leader of the South Boston gang, was the ruthless kingpin of a criminal empire that a federal judge said committed "unfathomable" acts. His infamous reign would be the inspiration for Jack Nicholson's character in Martin Scorsese's film "The Departed." Bulger evaded police for 16 years before his capture in 2011.
He died Tuesday in a West Virginia prison, an 89-year-old man serving two life sentences and five years.
"The guy is a sociopathic killer," Tom Foley, the former Massachusetts State police head who spent years trying to capture Bulger, told CNN in 2011. "He loved that type of life. He's one of the hardest and cruelest individuals that operated in the Boston area. He's a bad, bad, bad guy."
Bulger, a longtime FBI informant, was killed in the US Penitentiary Hazelton in Bruceton Mills. He was found unresponsive at 8:20 a.m., according to statement from the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
He was pronounced dead by the Preston County medical examiner after life saving measures failed. No other inmates or staff were injured, the prisons bureau said.
The FBI is investigating Bulger's death, which occurred a day after he was transferred to the West Virginia facility, the prison bureau said.
'It's a happy day'
A statement Tuesday from Andrew Lelling, the US Attorney for Massachusetts, was brief. It made no mention of Bulger other than he had died.
"We received word this morning about the death of James "Whitey" Bulger. Our thoughts are with his victims and their families," the statement said.
The brother of a woman Bulger was accused of killing in 1981 told CNN, "It's a happy day."
Steven Davis' 26-year-old sister, Debra Davis, was the girlfriend of Bulger partner Steve "The Rifleman" Flemmi. Flemmi testified that he lured Davis to a house where Bulger strangled her. Flemmi testified he "inadvertently blurted out" to Davis that he and Bulger were FBI informants, and that Bulger said several times "he wanted to kill" Davis because she knew about the relationship with the FBI.
The defense presented testimony from former hitman John Martorano, who admitted he "accidentally strangled" Davis. Martorano served 12 years in prison, but was released in 2007 in exchange for testifying against Bulger.
The jury had "no finding" in Davis' death. Bulger "didn't have the right to live as long as he did," her brother said.
The end of a '16-year honeymoon'
In 1995, Bulger skipped town ahead of a pending indictment, allegedly on a tip from a rogue FBI agent.
The mob boss, who took Osama bin Laden's place at the top of the FBI's Top 10 Most Wanted list, hid in plain sight in Santa Monica, California. He and his girlfriend, Catherine Elizabeth Greig, lived blocks from the beach under the aliases of Charlie and Carol Gasko. The fake name was even on the door bell list.
The couple dined some nights at a white-tablecloth establishment that drew Hollywood producers, sitting in a corner table in the patio at the back of the restaurant, a manager said. They were generally polite, too. Bulger often wore a hat, with the brim pulled down, neighbor Catalina Schlank told CNN in 2011.
"They were kind of secretive. Even on the phone -- you couldn't call them," she said. "Sometimes, I wanted to give them a tip of stuff on sale."
A tip led the authorities to him.
In 2011, the FBI lured a likely unsuspecting Bulger out of his seaside apartment. Bulger had received a phone call and was told that his lockbox had been broken into in the basement parking lot area of his building. The FBI arrested Bulger when he went to check it out, a source told CNN.
Bulger would refer to his years as a fugitive with Greig as a "16-year honeymoon."
In 2012, Greigwas sentenced to eight years in federal prison for identity fraud and helping Bulger avoid capture.
During Bulger's trial, gruesome details emerged about the deaths he was accused of being involved in.
Onetime enforcer Kevin Weeks testified how Bulger killed Arthur "Bucky" Barrett.
In the summer of 1983, Bulger organized a meeting with Barrett under the guise that he had stolen diamonds he wanted to get rid of. When Barrett showed up at the house, Weeks, Bulger and Flemmi were waiting.
They chained Barrett to a chair. For hours, they grilled him about a rival gang and local drug dealings, Weeks testified.
Barrett tried to buy his way to out, telling Bulger about his stash of $40,000.
Weeks said Bulger left the house to pick up the money while he and another associate watched Barrett. When Bulger returned, he told Barrett to walk down to the basement. Then Bulger put a gun to the back of Barrett's head and pulled the trigger, according to Weeks.
"Nothing happened," Weeks said.
Bulger realized the gun's safety was on. He removed the safety and shot Barrett, Weeks said.
'It's just sad that it took so long'
During his sentencing, Bulger did not make eye contact with the relatives of the people he killed, nor those slain by his accomplices in the Winter Hill Gang.
He was a convicted murderer in his 80s. He was likely going to die in prison.
Carmen Ortiz, the former US Attorney for Massachusetts who oversaw Bulger's prosecution, said she hopes Bulger's notoriety didn't take away the focus from his victims. Ortiz says she hopes his death "is the end of a very sad chapter in Boston's history, during which this man caused so much harm to many through his brutal crimes."
"He had it coming to him and it's just sad that it took so long," Steven Davis said.
https://www.wvnews.com/prestoncountynews/news/hazelton-officials-remain-mum-on-bulger-death/article_2ecb692b-9bae-5575-a7ee-e3d2d0f39cf0.html
Hazelton officials remain mum on Bulger death
HAZELTON — Holding the first community relations board meeting since the death of nationally known mobster James “Whitey” Bulger, Hazelton federal prison officials declined to discuss the incident.
The quarterly meetings are held so representatives of the community can hear from prison officials about various issues. Past meetings have addressed staffing levels, transportation of inmates to and from medical facilities, and public safety.
At Wednesday’s meeting, questions regarding Bulger’s murder were referred to the Department of Justice.
Bulger, 89, was beaten to death in his wheelchair within hours of his arrival at the Hazelton complex.
He had been serving life sentences after being implicated in 11 murder and convicted in 2013. It has been reported that inmates were responsible for Bulger’s death, but no charges have been filed.
He had been serving life sentences after being implicated in 11 murder and convicted in 2013. It has been reported that inmates were responsible for Bulger’s death, but no charges have been filed.
Over the weekend, the lawyer representing Bulger’s estate said he planned to file a wrongful death lawsuit against the federal government in order to find answers as to why Bulger had been transferred from Florida to West Virginia.
At the end of Wednesday’s meeting, Warden Joe Coakley said the prison wants to be as transparent as possible.
“I think we have a lot to offer the community,” Coakley said. “We value our relationship with our community members.”
Wednesday’s meeting instead focused on stemming the inflow of contraband into the federal facility.
Staff Writer Theresa Marthey can be reached at (304) 276-1127 or by email at tmarthey@prestonnj.com.
Staff Writer Theresa Marthey can be reached at (304) 276-1127 or by email at tmarthey@prestonnj.com.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/james-whitey-bulger-death-family-lawsuit-prison-killing-west-virginia-catherine-greig-a8676991.html
James ‘Whitey’ Bulger family plans to sue government over 'wrongful death'
Notorious mobster was killed by inmates in unlocked cell at a West Virginia federal prison
A lawyer for James “Whitey” Bulger is planning to file a wrongful death lawsuit against the government over the infamous gangster’s prison killing.
On October 30, some hours after arriving at a West Virginia federal prison, the 89-year-old was beaten to death by inmates inside his unlocked prison cell.
Hank Brennan, Bulger’s lawyer for seven years, said he would put forward wrongful death and negligence claims on behalf of the gangster’s estate.
In late September, the mobster told Mr Brennan that he received word he would be released from solitary confinement at a Florida federal prison and transferred to a prison medical facility. Bulger, however, was instead sent to a penitentiary at Hazelton, West Virginia.
A spokesperson for the Bureau of Prisons, told the Wall Street Journal Bulger was transferred to Hazelton after he allegedly made threats against a staff member, an allegation Mr Brennan denied.
The newspaper said the bureau declined to comment on any medical issues, or the threat of a lawsuit, and that it previously said it had sent a team of experts to the Hazelton complex “to assess operational activities and correctional security practices and measures to determine any relevant facts that may have contributed to the incident”.
Bulger’s medical classification was lowered to stipulate the 89-year-old needed less medical attention before he was transferred to Hazleton. Mr Brennan said Bulger’s medical classification should not have been downgraded since his health was worsening. The lawyer said Bulger was wheelchair-bound, appeared to be sickly, and complained about frequent heart complications, when the two last met in the central Florida prison in June.
“It’s important for the family and the public to know why the prisons decided to wheel an 89-year-old man with a history of heart attacks into one of the most dangerous prisons in the country,” Mr Brennan told the Journal.
Mr Brennan said he expected to file a series of lawsuits in the next month, but did not provide any further details.
Bulger was convicted in 2013 for his involvement in 11 murders among other crimes including extortion, money-laundering and drug-dealing from the 1970s to the mid-1990s.
The authorities are investigating his death as a murder, and believe that inmates targeted him because he served as an FBI informant, a claim he repeatedly denied. Two mobsters from Massachusetts are suspected to be involved in Bulger’s death, including a mafia hit man serving a life-sentence in the same prison.