Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Yo Trudeau Who gave Defence Minister Bill Blair the right to pick a fight with Putin?

$
0
0
 
 
 https://www.cbc.ca/player/play/video/9.6568010
 
 
 
archive.today
webpage capture
Saved from
no other snapshots from this url

 

---------- Original message ---------
From: Chrystia Freeland<Chrystia.Freeland@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Trudeau Who gave Defence Minister Bill Blair the right to pick a fight with Putin?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments.

Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel. Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.

 

---------- Original message ---------
From: Moore, Rob - M.P.<Rob.Moore@parl.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Trudeau Who gave Defence Minister Bill Blair the right to pick a fight with Putin?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>


*This is an automated response*

 

Thank you for contacting the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P. office. We appreciate the time you took to get in touch with our office.

 

If you did not already, please ensure to include your full contact details on your email and the appropriate staff will be able to action your request. We strive to ensure all constituent correspondence is responded to in a timely manner.

 

If your question or concern is time sensitive, please call our office: 506-832-4200.

 

Again, we thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and concerns.

 

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Office of the Honourable Rob Moore, P.C., M.P.

Member of Parliament for Fundy Royal

rob.moore@parl.gc.ca

 

 


---------- Original message ---------
From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada<mcu@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Automatic Reply
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>

Thank you for writing to the Honourable Arif Virani, Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada.

Due to the volume of correspondence addressed to the Minister, please note that there may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be carefully reviewed.

We do not respond to correspondence that contains offensive language.

-------------------

Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable Arif Virani, ministre de la Justice et procureur général du Canada.

En raison du volume de correspondance adressée au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Nous tenons à vous assurer que votre message sera lu avec soin.

Nous ne répondons pas à la correspondance contenant un langage offensant.

 

 
---------- Original message ---------
From: David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:23 PM
Subject: Yo Trudeau Who gave Defence Minister Bill Blair the right to pick a fight with Putin?
To: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, Nathalie.G.Drouin <Nathalie.G.Drouin@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, Greta.Bossenmaier <Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>, ragingdissident <ragingdissident@protonmail.com>, kris.austin <kris.austin@gnb.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, John.Williamson <John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, jake.stewart <jake.stewart@parl.gc.ca>, jan.jensen <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, Bill.Blair <Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, <Judy.Wagner@gnb.ca>, ltgov <ltgov@gnb.ca>, info <info@gg.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>
Cc: news <news@chco.tv>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, David.Akin <David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, <NIA_IG@navy.mil>, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, nia_ig.fct <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>


 
 
 

Russia's Putin signs updated doctrine that lowers threshold for using nuclear weapons

On 1,000th day since Russia invaded, Kremlin says Ukraine has employed long-range U.S. missiles

Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday signed a revised nuclear doctrine declaring that a conventional attack on Russia by any country that is supported by a nuclear power will be considered a joint attack on his country.

Putin's endorsement of the new nuclear deterrent policy comes on the 1,000th day after he sent troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. Putin first announced changes in the nuclear doctrine in September, when he chaired a meeting discussing the proposed revisions, but the signing follows an apparent decision by the U.S. to let Ukraine strike targets inside Russia with American-supplied longer-range missiles, which was first learned in published reports on the weekend.

Russia's Defence Ministry, as reported by Russian news agencies on Tuesday, said that Ukraine launched an attack on the Bryansk region overnight with six U.S.-made ATACMS long-range missiles. Debris from one missile fell on a military facility causing a fire, but the other five were intercepted, the report said.

The attack resulted in no casualties or damage, the ministry said.

Asked about the attack on a weapons depot in the Russian Bryansk region, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Kyiv now had U.S. ATACMS systems as well as its own long-range capabilities, and would use all of them.

'Irresponsible rhetoric'

The signing of the doctrine, which says that any massive aerial attack on Russia could trigger a nuclear response, reflects Putin's readiness to threaten use of the country's nuclear arsenal to force the West to back down as Moscow presses a slow-moving offensive in Ukraine.

Asked about whether the updated doctrine was deliberately issued on the heels of the U.S. decision to ease restrictions on Ukraine using its longer-range missiles to strike Russia, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the document was published "in a timely manner" and that Putin instructed the government to update it earlier this year so that it is "in line with the current situation."

WATCH l Ukrainians cautiously optimistic, but unclear how many ATACMS will be received:
 

Ukrainians welcome chance to fire deeper into Russia

13 hours ago
Duration 4:13
After nearly three years of bombardments, many Ukrainians welcome having the ability to strike back deeper into Russian territory as the U.S. is warned not to further escalate the war.

Russia's president has previously warned the U.S. and other NATO allies that allowing Ukraine to use Western-supplied longer-range weapons to hit Russian territory would mean that Russia and NATO are at war.

The White House National Security Council in a statement through a spokesperson characterized the doctrine change as unsurprising and "more of the same irresponsible rhetoric from Russia."

"Observing no changes to Russia's nuclear posture, we have not seen any reason to adjust our own nuclear posture or doctrine in response to Russia's statements today," the statement said.

Includes countries who support attack from a nuclear power

The updated doctrine states that an attack against his country by a non-nuclear power with the "participation or support of a nuclear power" will be seen as their "joint attack on the Russian Federation."

It doesn't specify whether such an attack would necessarily trigger a nuclear response. It mentions the "uncertainty of scale, time and place of possible use of nuclear deterrent" among the key principles of the nuclear deterrence.

WATCH l Canada supports weapons decision to defend against invasion: 
 

Canada supports decision to allow Ukraine to fire U.S. missiles into Russia

19 hours ago
Duration 2:25
Defence Minister Bill Blair says Canada supports the Biden administration's recent decision to allow Ukraine to fire U.S.-supplied long-range missiles into Russian territory.

At the same time, it spells out conditions for using nuclear weapons in greater detail compared to the previous version of the doctrine, noting they could be used in case of a massive air attack involving ballistic and cruise missiles, aircraft, drones and other flying vehicles.

The wide formulation appears to significantly broaden the triggers for possible nuclear weapons use compared with the previous version of the document, which stated that Russia could tap its atomic arsenal if "reliable information is received about the launch of ballistic missiles targeting the territory of Russia or its allies."

The revised doctrine envisages that Russia could use nuclear weapons in response to aggression against its ally Belarus.

Belarus's authoritarian President Alexander Lukashenko, who has ruled the country with an iron hand for more than 30 years, has relied on Russian subsidies and support. He has let Russia use his country's territory to send troops into Ukraine and allowed the Kremlin to deploy some of its tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus.

Another Sumy attack kills several

Advancing village by village, Russia since August has recorded its fastest gains in Ukraine since the first year of the war.

Russian forces claimed the capture of the Ukrainian settlement of Novoselydivka in Eastern Ukraine, Russian state news agency TASS reported on Tuesday, citing the Defence Ministry.

Dozens of people stand outside a multistorey residential building that has been partially destroyed, with concrete debris on the ground. Rescuers and volunteers remove debris at the site of a residential building hit by a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in the town of Hlukhiv, Sumy region, Ukraine on Tuesday. (Reuters)

Meanwhile, 12 people, including a child, were killed in a Russian drone attack on Ukraine's northeastern region of Sumy, Ukrainian officials said on Tuesday.

The drone attack overnight on a residential building in the small town of Hlukhiv bordering Russia also wounded 13 people, including three children, Ukraine's national police force said.

Ukraine's air force said it had shot down 51 drones and lost track of 30 more after Russia launched 87 drones overnight. Drones that disappear from radar have often been brought down by Ukrainian electronic defences.

Russian forces have pummelled the northeastern region of Sumy in recent months, damaging its critical and civilian infrastructure.

A missile strike there on Sunday killed 11 people, injured 89 and cut power for thousands.

With files from Reuters

 
 
Deja Vu Anyone???


Friday, 2 April 2021

Russia warns NATO against deploying troops to Ukraine

https://twitter.com/DavidRaymondAm1/with_replies 

 

 

Image
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
NATO has been picking a fight long before this weekend but big media ain't been saying much about it until now Methinks it was no coincidence US Naval Intel people called me on Good Friday N'esy Pas?

https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2021/04/russia-warns-nato-against-deploying.html 

 

 #nbpoli #cdnpoli #CORRUPTION

 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:03:08 +0000
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie Anglin?
 
Dear David Amos,
 
The Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) Office of the Inspector General (IG) reviewed your email and attached .WAV file provided to the NIA Hotline on 2 April 2021. I found no connection to the United States Navy or United States Naval Intelligence.
Naval Inspectors General exist to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of US Navy Programs, and strive to eliminate and prevent waste, fraud, and abuse with their respective departments. Naval IGs are restricted to assessing matters falling within the purview of their respective commanders.
 
Citing the lack of an apparent connection to the US Navy or Naval Intelligence, I am unable to provide further assistance, or provide direct referral to any other agency or activity.
 
Sincerely,
Mark Koneda
Investigator
Naval Intelligence Activity
Office of the Inspector General
(301)669-3030 (unclass)
TSVOIP 560-3030
 
INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The information contained in this email and any accompanying attachments may contain Inspector General sensitive or pre-decisional information, which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA, 5 USC Section 552). It should not be released to unauthorized persons. If you are not the intended recipient of this information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you received this email in error, please notify this office by email or by
calling (301) 669-3030.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/ukraine-says-russia-massing-troops-on-border-u-s-warns-moscow-1.5371806

 

Ukraine says Russia massing troops on border; U.S. warns Moscow

Dmytro Gorshkov

AFPStaff

Agence France-Presse’s network of 201 bureaus covers 151 countries, with 80 nationalities represented among its 2,400 collaborators. AFP is a global news agency delivering in-depth coverage of the events shaping our world from conflicts to politics, economics, sports, entertainment and the latest breakthroughs in health, science and technology.

The Agency operates regional hubs in five geographical zones: Africa, North America, Latin America, Asia, Middle East

Published Thursday, April 1, 2021 4:09PM EDT 
 
Ukraine

Ukraine has been locked in a conflict with Russian-backed separatists since 2014. (AFP)

KYIV, UKRAINE -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday accused Moscow of building up troops on his country's border as the United States warned Russia against "intimidating" Ukraine.

Kiev has been locked in a conflict with Russian-backed separatists since 2014, and this week Ukrainian officials reported Russian troop movement in annexed Crimea and on the border, near territories controlled by Moscow-backed separatists.

On Thursday, Zelensky's ministers discussed the escalating security situation with Western allies including U.S. Secretary of Defence Lloyd Austin.

"Muscle-flexing in the form of military exercises and possible provocations along the border are traditional Russian games," Zelensky said in a statement.

He accused Moscow of seeking to create "a threatening atmosphere" as Kiev hopes to resume a ceasefire brokered last year.

The U.S. State Department said it was "absolutely concerned by recent escalations of Russian aggressive and provocative actions in eastern Ukraine."

"What we would object to are aggressive actions that have an intent of intimidating, of threatening, our partner Ukraine," State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters.

Some observers say the reported Russian troop buildup is a test for the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden, who caused an uproar in Moscow last month by calling his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin a "killer".

This week, Moscow and Kyiv blamed each other for a rise in violence between government forces and Kremlin-backed separatists in eastern Ukraine, which has undermined the ceasefire.

Zelensky said 20 Ukrainian servicemen had been killed and 57 wounded since the start of the year.

Separately, the military announced that a Ukrainian soldier was wounded in an attack it blamed on separatists.

'READY FOR AN OFFENSIVE'

On Thursday, U.S. Secretary of Defence Austin called his Ukrainian counterpart Andriy Taran, Ukraine's defence ministry said.

Austin said during the call that Washington would "not leave Ukraine alone in the event of escalating Russian aggression", the ministry said.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba for his part discussed the "aggravation by the Russian Federation of the security situation" on the frontline with his Canadian counterpart Marc Garneau.

Ukraine's military intelligence accused Russia of preparing to "expand its military presence" in the separatist-controlled eastern regions of Donetsk and Lugansk.

In a statement, the intelligence service said it "does not rule out" an attempt by Russian forces to move "deep into Ukrainian territory".

A high-ranking Ukrainian government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, claimed that the Russian army was practising "military co-ordination" with separatists.

"From mid-April their combat units will be ready for an offensive," the official told AFP.

WEST SHOULD NOT 'WORRY'

Moscow has repeatedly denied sending troops and arms to buttress the separatists and Putin's spokesman stressed on Thursday that Moscow is at liberty to move troops across its territory.

"The Russian Federation moves its armed forces within its territory at its discretion," spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, but he did not directly confirm a troop buildup on the Ukrainian border.

He added that "it should not worry anyone and does not pose a threat to anyone".

The war in eastern Ukraine broke out in 2014 when Russia annexed the Crimean peninsula following a bloody uprising that ousted Ukraine's Kremlin-friendly president Viktor Yanukovych.

On Wednesday, the Pentagon said U.S. forces in Europe had raised their alert status following the "recent escalations of Russian aggression in eastern Ukraine".

Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, also spoke with his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts, Valery Gerasimov and Ruslan Khomchak.

Khomchak said this week that 28,000 separatist fighters and "more than 2,000 Russian military instructors and advisers" are currently stationed in eastern Ukraine.

On Thursday, the deputy head of Zelensky's office, Roman Mashovets, called for joint drills with NATO forces to "help stabilise the security situation".

Zelensky was elected in 2019 promising to end the years-long conflict, but critics say a shaky ceasefire was his only tangible achievement.

The fighting has claimed more than 13,000 lives since 2014, according to the United Nations.






Ukraine can fire U.S. missiles into Russia. The Kremlin changes its nuke policy. Is this what everyone feared?

On the 1,000th day after its invasion of Ukraine, Russia updated its nuclear doctrine

On Tuesday, just hours after Ukraine appeared to have fired U.S.-made ballistic missiles into Russia — likely for the first time — the Kremlin published changes to its nuclear doctrine, lowering the threshold for what would justify a nuclear response.

The changes, which the Kremlin said were developed over several months, state that Russia will consider using nuclear weapons if its sovereignty is critically threatened by a conventional weapon with the support of a nuclear power.

"The enemy must understand the inevitability of retaliation for aggression against the Russian Federation," said Dmitry Peskov, the spokesperson for the Kremlin, during a regular press teleconference on Tuesday.

An unnamed U.S. official told Reuters it was the first time the ATACMS were used by Ukraine inside Russia. 

Russian state media reported Ukraine fired six ballistic missiles at a facility in the Bryansk region overnight. Without offering evidence, RIA Novosti said Russia's air defence system shot down five of the missiles and damaged a sixth, which fell on the territory of the facility, sparking a fire that was extinguished.

FILE PHOTO: United States and South Korean troops utilizing the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) and South Korea's Hyunmoo Missile II, fire missiles into the waters of the East Sea, off South Korea, July 5, 2017.  U.S. and South Korean troops utilize the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) and South Korea's Hyunmoo Missile II to fire into the waters of the East Sea off South Korea on July 5, 2017. (United States Army/Reuters)

Ukrainian media reported the missiles hit a weapons depot located 110 kilometres from its border with Russia.

An unspecified number of ATACMS (or Army Tactical Missile System) units were delivered to Ukraine last year. But the outgoing administration of U.S. President Joe Biden just reversed its policy and is now allowing Ukraine to fire the weapons deeper into Russia. 

Tatiana Stanovaya, a Russian political analyst and founder of R. Politik, an analysis firm, says Russia's decision to publish its nuclear doctrine on Tuesday was deliberately timed to respond to the ATACMS decision.

"This marks an extraordinarily dangerous juncture," she wrote CBC News over the messaging app Telegram.

"The current situation offers Putin a significant temptation to escalate. With Trump not yet in office, such a move would not interfere with any immediate peace initiatives, but could instead reinforce Trump's argument for direct dialogue with Putin."

'The catalyst of the escalation'

U.S. president-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly vowed to end the war in Ukraine quickly, without offering any specifics.

Stanovaya believes Russia calculated its response in an effort to try and deter Ukraine from using the missiles, and push blame toward Biden for "being the catalyst of the escalation."

Ukrainian officials and Western analysts believe the missiles, which have a maximum range of 300 kilometres, aren't likely to lead to a dramatic shift on the ground, because Ukraine has a limited number of weapons systems and Russia has redeployed many of its helicopters and bombers to airbases out of ATACMS range.

 But according to the U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War, there are still hundreds of other Russian military targets in range of the weapons.

Ukraine received the ATACMS last October, and for the past several months it has pleaded to be allowed to use them more freely. Political observers believe the U.S. granted the permission now, because thousands of North Korean troops have been deployed to Russia's Kursk region for an anticipated counter-offensive.

In a surprise push in August, Ukraine captured an estimated 1,200 square kilometres in the Kursk region

In an image supplied by the Press service of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, rescuers work at a site of a residential building hit by a Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in the town of Hlukhiv, Sumy region, Ukraine November 19, 2024.     In an image supplied by the press service of the State Emergency Service of Ukraine, rescuers work at the site of a residential building hit by a Russian drone strike in the town of Hlukhiv, Sumy region, Ukraine, on Nov. 19, 2024. (State Emergency Service of Ukraine in Sumy region/Reuters)

Now, 1,000 days into Russia's full-scale invasion, its military, bolstered with North Korean recruits, appears positioned to try and take the territory back. 

"The situation is quite tense … the enemy is trying to oust us ... but at the moment, they are not able to," said a Ukrainian soldier who CBC News agreed to only identify as Wolverine, due to security concerns. 

Wolverine, who spent two months fighting in Kursk, spoke to CBC News from the Sumy region, where he was on leave but preparing to head back into battle. 

He described the recent ATACMS decision as "better late than never." But he says the fact it was a long time coming, and that it has been so widely reported, has removed any element of surprise. 

"The enemy can prepare and simply move its airfields, warehouses ... move its parts all to safe places where the weapons cannot reach."

Months of negotiations

Throughout the war, Ukraine's Western allies have grown increasingly comfortable supplying Kyiv with more powerful and deadlier weapons, despite concerns that it could escalate the conflict.  

Earlier in the war, there were negotiations over supplying Western-built tanks. Ukraine pleaded for F-16 fighter jets for months, before the jets started arriving this summer.

 According to Matthew Savill, military sciences director for the London-based Royal United Services Institute, the impact of the ATACMS would have been greater had Ukraine been given the weapons and permission to fire them into Russia from the outset. 

In a written press briefing, Savill noted the Russian planes launching glide-bombs and cruise missiles at Ukrainian cities are largely stationed out of ATACMS range, with some parked 1,000 km away from the border. However, he says ATACMS would still be able target supply hubs, headquarters and ammunition depots.

"It may help the Ukrainians fight to hold on to the Kursk incursion … and inflict casualties on those North Korean forces that are now operating inside Russia," Savill wrote. 

"The impact [of the ATACMS decision] may be more political, albeit with a narrowing window of opportunity."

Ukraine's response

Speaking to reporters in Kyiv on Tuesday, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy didn't confirm the overnight strike, but said the country has ATACMS and "will use them, all of them."

WATCH | Zelenskyy says Russian President Vladimir Putin wants war and chaos:
 

'Putin wants war' and chaos in the world, Zelenskyy says

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, speaking in Kyiv on the 1,000th day of war, says Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to destroy Ukraine and 'make chaos in the world.' 

During the joint news conference with Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, Zelenskyy responded to Russia's ramped-up nuclear policy and urged Germany to supply Kyiv with Taurus long-range missiles, which it has been hesitant to do. 

"I think after statements about nuclear weapons, it is also time for Germany to support corresponding decisions," Zelenskyy said. 

France and Britain have not yet confirmed whether they will follow the Americans by allowing Ukraine to fire their Storm Shadow/SCALP cruise missiles into Russia. The missiles have a range of 250 km.

The Kremlin's response follows a familiar pattern — it's claiming that NATO was trying to escalate the war with a provocation that was akin to "throwing fuel on a fire."

The headline on the Tuesday morning broadcast of the state media news program 60 Minutes said, "If there is an attack on Russia territory, this means a direct attack by NATO.

"Throughout the war, Russia has routinely accused NATO, and specifically the U.S., of waging a fight against Russia. 

"We are very much hopeful that Trump's people, and he himself, can overturn this decision," said Maria Butina, a Russian MP who spoke to CBC News over Zoom. 

Butina, who was convicted in the U.S. of being a covert agent, told CBC she believes the U.S. is close to pushing the conflict toward "World War Three," but would not comment on or even acknowledge that Russia has imported thousands of North Korean soldiers.

Russian lawmaker Maria Butina accused the U.S of trying to escalate the war, by allowing Ukraine to fire U.S.made ballistic missiles deeper into Russia. Russian lawmaker Maria Butina accused the U.S of trying to escalate the war by allowing Ukraine to fire U.S.-made ballistic missiles deeper into Russia. (Submitted by Maria Butina )

Reuters reported on Tuesday that Russia has begun serial production of mobile bomb shelters that can withstand a variety of threats, including shockwaves and radiation from a nuclear blast.

Butina says Biden's reversal on the use of ATACMS raises the stakes, noting that the U.S. and Russia are nuclear powers.

"While these big guys are playing politics in the United States, they don't fully realize that actually it could be the end for the whole human race."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Briar Stewart

Foreign Correspondent

Briar Stewart is a CBC correspondent, based in London. During her nearly two decades with CBC, she has reported across Canada and internationally. She can be reached at briar.stewart@cbc.ca or on X @briarstewart.

With files from Reuters and Corinne Seminoff








Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Trending Articles