From: David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 4:05 AM
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: brigitte belton <gidget642@gmail.com>, <davids@opabinllp.com>, <kwilson@wilsonlawoffices.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, rob.moore <rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>
Cc: pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, Jason Lavigne <jason@yellowhead.vote>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, <ps.ministerofpublicsafety-ministredelasecuritepublique.sp@ps-sp.gc.ca>, Pam Stavropoulos <pstavropoulos@iprimus.com.au>, Dominic.Cardy <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, Robert. Jones <Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, JUSTMIN <JUSTMIN@novascotia.ca>, Jean.Chretien <Jean.Chretien@dentons.com>
From: David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:37 PM
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: <Vincent.gircys@gmail.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:30:55 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: prontoman1@protonmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:56:02 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: AngryScotian@proton.me
Notice the webcast and transcript is missing then checkout pages 1, 2, 3 and 13
https://www.banking.senate.
Full Committee Hearing
Review of Current Investigations and Regulatory Actions Regarding the
Mutual Fund Industry
Date: Thursday, November 20, 2003 Time: 02:00 PM
Topic
The Committee will meet in OPEN SESSION to conduct the second in a
series of hearings on the “Review of Current Investigations and
Regulatory Actions Regarding the Mutual Fund Industry.”
Witnesses
Witness Panel 1
Mr. Stephen M. Cutler
Director - Division of Enforcement
Securities and Exchange Commission
Cutler - November 20, 2003
Mr. Robert Glauber
Chairman and CEO
National Association of Securities Dealers
Glauber - November 20, 2003
Eliot Spitzer
Attorney General
State of New York
Spitzer - November 20, 2003
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 19:01:03 -0400
Subject: Fwd: hey
To: Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 18:33:20 -0400
Subject: hey
To: monick@grenierlaw.ca
Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta
Citation: Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd v Drover, 2016 ABQB 420
Date: 20160728
Docket: 1401 03156
Registry: Calgary
Between:
Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd.
Plaintiff - and -
David H. Drover and Emerex Resources Ltd.
Defendants |
_______________________________________________________
Honourable Mr. JusticeJ.T. McCarthy
_______________________________________________________
The Application
[1] The Plaintiff Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd. brought an action against the Defendants David Drover and Emerex Resources Ltd. for breach of fiduciary duty. In response, David Drover and Emerex Resources Ltd. counterclaimed against Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd., Dean Smith, Brian Hunter, Terry Bradshaw, Shane Hawryluk and Joseph Dand.
[2] For this application, the Applicants (defendants by counterclaim) Dean Smith, Brian Hunter, Terry Bradshaw and Shane Hawryluk, seek an order requiring the Respondent (counterclaimant) David Drover, to post security for costs with respect to the counterclaim. The Applicants seek $300,000 for security for costs on a solicitor-client basis. Alternatively, they seek $200,000 on a party-party basis.
The Parties
[3] The Plaintiff Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd. (‘EOGL’) is a corporation registered pursuant to the laws of Alberta. EOGL was incorporated on March 29, 2011 and has been carrying on petroleum exploration and development in Saskatchewan. Its head office is in Calgary. EOGL is not participating in this application.
[4] Dean Smith is a shareholder, current director, and former officer of EOGL. He has been a director since June 2012. His positions as an officer included vice president - business development, chief executive officer and president. In their brief, the Applicants state that Mr. Smith served as an officer from June 2012 until February 7, 2014. However, one of the Applicants, Terry Bradshaw, in his January 20, 2015 Affidavit, states that Mr. Smith served as an officer of EOGL from June 2012 until September 25, 2013.
[5] Brian Hunter is a shareholder and current director of EOGL. He has been a director since October 2013.
[6] Terry Bradshaw is a shareholder, former director and former officer of EOGL. He was a director from October 30, 2013 until August 19, 2015. He served as president of EOGL from January 27, 2015 until August 19, 2015.
[7] Shane Hawryluk is a shareholder and former president of EOGL. In their brief, the Applicants state that Mr. Hawryluk was president from February 7, 2014 until January 26, 2015. However, in his January 20, 2015 Affidavit, Mr. Bradshaw states that Mr. Hawryluk became president of EOGL on November 1, 2013. The Applicants also state that the date of Mr. Hawryluk’s resignation is not in evidence.
[8] David Drover is a shareholder, former director and former officer of EOGL. From the incorporation of EOGL until October 2013, Mr. Drover was a director and officer. As an officer, his positions included president, chief executive officer, executive chairman and chief operations officer.
[9] Mr. Drover has been a resident of Castlegar, British Columbia since early 2014. According to his Affidavit sworn on May 4, 2016, Mr. Drover jointly owns his home with his wife. There is $137,250 worth of equity in his house. He also is the “sole proprietor of a numbered company registered in Alberta.” Based on his Affidavit, the nature of his interest in the numbered company is not clear. The numbered company has $200,000 worth of assets – half of which is cash. Mr. Drover owns in excess of $600,000 in shares of TSX listed companies. Finally, he also has a number of shares in the company Acapella.
[10] Emerex Resources Ltd. is not participating in this application.
Overview of Litigation
[11] The present litigation arises out of all the parties’ involvement with EOGL. All the parties in this application are investors and past or present directors or officers of EOGL.
[12] Mr. Drover incorporated EOGL in March 2011. Over the course of 2012 and 2013, he sought out investors for EOGL. A great many of the investors were his friends and family. The Applicants Dean Smith, Brian Hunter, Terry Bradshaw and Shane Hawryluk were also investors. EOGL had two financing periods: around August 2012, EOGL raised approximately $1,600,000 in share capital, and in February 2013, EOGL raised approximately $700,000.
[13] In July 2012, EOGL purchased a 1920 acre lease in Saskatchewan from Sundance Energy. The cost of the lease was $1,000, and also included the assumed liability for abandoning nine oil and gas wells. The lease was subject to forfeiture if a well was not drilled on the land within 60 days. Therefore, EOGL drilled a well in late September 2012. The well was operational and produced oil and water for two months; however, it was shut-in in November 2012 due to pump rod failure.
[14] Over the course of 2013, the relationship between the Applicants and Mr. Drover became strained, largely over the financial management of EOGL. The situation came to a head in October 2013.
[15] EOGL’s AGM was scheduled for the end of October 2013. Prior to the AGM, several shareholders requisitioned the board of EOGL to call a special shareholder’s meeting. One of the purposes of the meeting was to remove Mr. Drover from EOGL’s board. In response to the requisition, Mr. Drover resigned from the board of directors. He also resigned as president.
[16] Due to the various conflicts stemming out of these dealings, Mr. Drover filed a statement of claim against EOGL and Dean Smith on February 11, 2014; however, he discontinued his legal action on March 18, 2014.
[17] On March 21, 2014, EOGL filed a statement of claim against Mr. Drover and his company, Emerex Resources Ltd. EOGL sought damages from Mr. Drover for breach of fiduciary duties. On June 9, 2014, Mr. Drover filed a counterclaim against the Applicants and EOGL. Mr. Drover’s counterclaim included claims of negligent statements, oppressive conduct, breach of duty, conspiracy and defamation.
[18] The Applicants made this application for security for costs, with respect to the counterclaim, on January 20, 2015. However, the application was not heard until May 25, 2016.
Allegations in the Claim and Counterclaim
[19] The Applicants state in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit that from EOGL’s inception until October 2013, Mr. Drover controlled EOGL. He made all board decisions. During that period, EOGL’s board was composed of two people, Mr. Drover and Dean Smith. However, Mr. Drover, being the chairman of the board, held an extra deciding vote in the case of a tie. As such, Mr. Drover had ultimate control over EOGL’s board decisions.
[20] The Applicants further contend that in early 2013 they became concerned with Mr. Drover’s leadership of EOGL. The Applicants recommended several changes to Mr. Drover, such as a new board of directors and an audit committee. However, Mr. Drover refused to address the Applicants’ concerns.
[21] On October 2, 2013, due to the Applicants’ concerns, various shareholders requisitioned the board of EOGL to call a special shareholder meeting. The meeting was called to remove Mr. Drover from EOGL’s board and to elect new directors. Prior to the special meeting, Mr. Drover resigned from EOGL’s board. He also resigned as president of EOGL.
[22] At the AGM on October 30, 2013, Brian Hunter and Terry Bradshaw were elected to the board of EOGL. Dean Smith was re-elected to the board. The newly elected directors undertook a review of EOGL’s books, records and operations. Up until this time, EOGL did not have an auditor – instead, financial statements were prepared and approved on instruction from Mr. Drover. Therefore, the shareholders appointed MNP LLP as EOGL’s financial auditor. Once appointed auditor, MNP began to prepare an audited financial statement for EOGL.
[23] Prior to the October AGM, in the spring of 2013, Mr. Drover, acting for EOGL, retained Chapman Petroleum Engineering Ltd. for the purpose of preparing a report on the proved and probable oil reserves located in EOGL’s lease. Chapman finished the report in September 2013. Mr. Drover then distributed the report to the shareholders.
[24] Also, in advance of the October 2013 AGM, an information circular, signed by Mr. Drover, was issued to the shareholders. The information circular contained an unaudited financial statement for the year ending in December 31, 2012.
[25] As part of MNP’s audit of EOGL, MNP reviewed the Chapman report and the 2012 unaudited financial statement. After reviewing both documents, MNP concluded that both documents were inaccurate. The revised Chapman report reduced the proved reserves by 90% and the probable reserves by 30%. The original Chapman report grossly overvalued the reserves due to the use of inaccurate operating costs. The Applicants argue that although Mr. Drover did not supply these operating costs to Chapman Engineering, Mr. Drover, as president of EOGL, should have noticed the inaccurate operating costs upon review of the draft report. The original and revised Chapman reports appear as Exhibits C and D, respectively, in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit.
[26] The 2012 unaudited financial statement originally stated that the profits of EOGL for 2012 were $1,500. However, the audited financial statement found that EOGL actually experienced a loss of $1,500,000 for 2012. The unaudited and audited financial statements appear as Exhibits E and F, respectively, in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit.
[27] The Applicants argue that MNP’s audit of EOGL showed several other financial improprieties – all of which occurred while Mr. Drover was in control of EOGL. These financial improprieties are listed in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit and include: (1) EOGL management was paid salaries, despite Mr. Drover’s representation to shareholders to the contrary; (2) various expenses were reported as capital assets on EOGL’s balance sheet; (3) Mr. Drover caused EOGL to make payments for services rendered to his own company, Emerex Resources Ltd. and (4) Mr. Drover submitted expense claims to EOGL for personal or non-business related expenses.
[28] The review of EOGL’s operations by the newly elected directors also revealed several irregularities with the business operations of EOGL. These irregularities are listed in Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit and include: (1) the cost associated with the liability for abandoning the nine wells acquired through the lease was underestimated by approximately $118,000; (2) a successful drilling program was unlikely due to the geological characteristics of the oil reserves underneath EOGL’s acquired lease and (3) Mr. Drover sought and raised $700,000 in the second financing period despite having the knowledge that the lease acquired by EOGL in 2012 would likely not support a successful drilling program.
[29] On January 29, 2014, after completing their review of EOGL, the new directors issued a report to the shareholders. The report contained their findings on EOGL. Exhibit H of Terry Bradshaw’s January 20, 2015 Affidavit contains the report to the shareholders. Mr. Drover claims that the contents of this report were defamatory.
[30] The new directors concluded that further investment into EOGL’s lease was uneconomical. Therefore, the new directors sought to sell the assets of EOGL. However, no bids or offers were received. The directors then sought to terminate the lease and abandon the wells, the estimated cost being $230,000.
[31] On February 11, 2014, Mr. Drover filed a statement of claim against EOGL and Dean Smith for the recovery of approximately $112,000 that he claimed EOGL owed to him or to his company, Emerex Resources Ltd. However, he discontinued the action on March 18, 2014.
[32] Despite Mr. Drover discontinuing his action, EOGL proceeded to file a statement of claim against Mr. Drover and Emerex Resources Ltd. on March 21, 2014.
[33] On April 29, 2014, Mr. Drover filed a defence. On June 9, 2014, he filed a counterclaim. The counterclaim, in addition to including the original Plaintiff EOGL, included Joseph Dand, Terry Bradshaw, Brian Hunter, Dean Smith and Shane Hawryluk – the latter four being the Applicants.
[34] Mr. Drover’s counterclaim outlined the following claims: (1) recovery for legitimate business expenses; (2) Emerex Resources Ltd. sought the amount that EOGL agreed to pay on its behalf with respect to services rendered by a third party; (3) the Applicants breached their fiduciary duty towards Mr. Drover through various means, including by failing to develop the lease, by not correcting the deficiencies in the revised Chapman Engineering report and by rejecting the findings of the original Chapman Engineering report; (4) the Applicants conspired against Mr. Drover and unlawfully and fraudulently injured Mr. Drover and (5) Mr. Drover was defamed by the various shareholder reports and emails authored by the new directors.
[35] The Applicants filed a defence to the counterclaim on June 13, 2014 and served their affidavit of records on July 30, 2014. Mr. Drover and ERL served their affidavits of records in February 2016. Mr. Drover’s affidavit of records is 170 pages in length and lists 20,800 producible documents. The Applicants affidavit of records lists 224 records.
[36] The Applicants first filed their application for security for costs on January 20, 2015 at which time Mr. Drover had not served his affidavit of records on the Applicants. The application was originally scheduled for February 5, 2015; however, it was rescheduled to October 13, 2015 by consent. The application was further adjourned on September 18, 2015 and this matter was placed into case management on October 7, 2015.
Issues
[37] The two issues to be resolved are:
1. Whether the Plaintiff by counterclaim, Mr. Drover, should be required to pay security for costs prior to proceeding with his counterclaim?
2. If yes, what amount of security should be ordered?
The Law
[38] Rule 4.22 of the Alberta Rules of Court, Alta Reg 124/2010 (the “Rules”) and s 254 of the Business Corporations Act, RSA 2000, c B-9 provide the framework for deciding security for costs applications. Section 254 of the Business Corporations Act is applicable exclusively to bodies corporate (Amex Electrical Ltd v 726934 Alberta Ltd, 2014 ABQB 66 at para 6, 582 AR 304 [Amex]). Rule 4.22 of the Rules is applicable to individuals. Rule 4.22 states that:
The Court may order a party to provide security for payment of a costs award if the Court considers it just and reasonable to do so, taking into account all of the following:
(a) whether it is likely the applicant for the order will be able to enforce an order or judgment against assets in Alberta;
(b) the ability of the respondent to the application to pay the costs award;
(c) the merits of the action in which the application is filed;
(d) whether an order to give security for payment of a costs award would unduly prejudice the respondent’s ability to continue the action;
(e) any other matter the Court considers appropriate.
[39] Rule 4.22 of the Rules establishes a two-step security for costs analysis. First, the court must consider all the factors outlined in Rule 4.22. Second, the court should consider whether ordering the security for costs is just and reasonable (Attila Dogan Construction and Installation Co Inc v AMEC Americas Limited, 2011 ABQB 175 at paras 24-25, 504 AR 295 [AMEC]).
Applicants’ Positions on Security for Costs
[40] The Applicants lay out five reasons supporting this security for costs application. These reasons mirror the factors outlined in Rule 4.22.
[41] For the first factor under Rule 4.22, the Applicants state that they will be unable to enforce an order or judgment against assets in Alberta. The Applicants argue that Mr. Drover has few, if any, assets in Alberta. His home, which is jointly owned with his wife, is in British Columbia. Mr. Drover does not own any real estate in Alberta and it is unclear where his various shareholdings are situated. Therefore, the Applicants argue that they will not be able to enforce a costs award against Mr. Drover’s assets in Alberta.
[42] For the second factor, the Applicants argue in their brief that Mr. Drover has testified that he has sufficient assets to pay a costs award. The Applicants argue that Mr. Drover’s ability to pay favours ordering a security for costs award. Conversely, in their security for costs application, the Applicants state that Mr. Drover would be unable to pay costs in the event that the Applicants were successful in defending this action. Presumably, the Applicants meant that they would be unable to collect a costs award, as Mr. Drover had no assets in Alberta.
[43] For the third factor, the Applicants argue that they have a reasonably meritorious defence against Mr. Drover’s claim. The Applicants state that the merits of the case should only be considered on the basis of undisputed facts and the pleadings (Provalcid Inc v Graff, 2014 ABQB 453 at para 97, 591 AR 117 [Provalcid]). The Applicants bring forward various defences against Mr. Drover’s claims of breach of fiduciary duty, oppression, conspiracy and defamation.
[44] Against Mr. Drover’s claims of oppression and breach of fiduciary duty, the Applicants argue the business judgment rule, which is a defence for business decisions made by directors as long as the decisions lie within a range of reasonable alternatives (Peoples Department Stores Inc v Wise, 2004 SCC 68 at paras 64 to 67, [2004] 3 SCR 461). The Applicants argue that their decision to abandon the wells on EOGL’s lease was made after consulting with Chapman Engineering and MNP, two independent companies. The Applicants also acknowledge that, due to s 243(3) of the Business Corporations Act, a complainant in oppression is not required to post security for costs. The Applicants do not seek security for costs for the oppression portion of the counterclaim. However, they seek security for costs for the remainder of the counterclaim.
[45] Against the claim of conspiracy, the Applicants allege that as shareholders of EOGL, they had a statutory right to requisition board members to have a shareholder meeting to remove Mr. Drover as a director. The Applicants further believe that Mr. Drover’s alleged mismanagement of EOGL was sufficient cause to seek his removal as a director.
[46] Against the claims of defamation, the Applicants argue that they have defences pursuant to the principles of justification, fair comment and qualified privilege. The Applicants contend that the statements made in the allegedly defamatory material, which were two shareholder reports and two emails authored by Mr. Bradshaw, were true statements made carefully in reliance on information received from EOGL’s professional advisors. The Applicants also argue these statements were made without malice.
[47] With respect to qualified privilege, the Applicants argue that the director-shareholder relationship established a qualified privilege over the allegedly defamatory communications. The statements were made by Terry Bradshaw, who was then a director of EOGL. As a director of EOGL, he had a duty to convey information about EOGL to the various shareholders.
[48] For the fourth factor, the Applicants argue that Mr. Drover has sufficient assets to pay a costs award. Therefore, Mr. Drover would not be unduly prejudiced by an order to pay security for costs.
[49] For the fifth factor, the Applicants list three specific considerations that were mentioned in Provalcid at paragraphs 90 to 92 and 104 to 108. The considerations were (a) whether the application was brought at the earliest opportunity, (b) whether the applicant seeks security for steps already taken and (c) whether the resolution of the issues is important to the community.
[50] For timeliness, the Applicants argue that the application was brought very early in the proceeding. The Applicants state that they do not seek security for any step taken to date in this matter. The Applicants argue that there is nothing of public importance in Mr. Drover’s counterclaim. The dispute is private in nature. There are no public interest issues that warrant special consideration.
[51] With respect to whether ordering security for costs would be just and reasonable, the Applicants point to the alleged behaviour of Mr. Drover during these proceedings. In their brief, the Applicants point to Mr. Drover’s inappropriate communication with the Applicants’ counsel; Mr. Drover’s inappropriate comments made online against the Applicants’ families; Mr. Drover’s direct communication with the court; Mr. Drover’s contemptuous attitude toward the Court and the ballooning of legal expenses due to Mr. Drover’s conduct.
[52] The Applicants argue that Mr. Drover’s conduct is relevant in deciding whether it is just and reasonable to order security for costs. The Applicants cite paragraph 41 of Amex in support of their argument: “A litigant whose lack of resources or their location immunizes him from some of the factors which cause a person to behave as a responsible litigant is a liability to the court system.” The Applicants argue that Amex gives further justification for ordering Mr. Drover to pay security for costs.
[53] With respect to amount, the Applicants argue that Mr. Drover should pay $300,000 for security for costs on a solicitor-client basis. Alternatively, they seek $200,000 on a party-party basis.
[54] Relying on the factors set out in Pillar Resources Services Inc v Primewest Energy Inc, 2016 ABQB 120, [2016] AWLD 1366 [Pillar], the Applicants argue that costs should be awarded on a solicitor-client basis. Due to the size of Mr. Drover’s affidavit of records, and the time required to prepare for trial, the Applicant’s argue that the legal fees from the present time forward would be $300,000.
[55] In the alternative, the Applicants submit a draft bill of costs, which is Exhibit A in Mr. Bradshaw’s April 8, 2016 Affidavit. The amount in the draft bill of costs is $101,500.00. However, the Applicants argue that a multiple should be applied to the party-party costs, resulting in party-party costs of $200,000.
Respondent’s Position on Security for Costs
[56] Mr. Drover pointed to two potential statutory provisions that govern security for costs applications: s 254 of the Business Corporations Act and Rule 4.22 of the Rules. Mr. Drover argues that s 254 of the Business Corporations Act should not be used to determine this application.
[57] Mr. Drover, in his brief, listed factors that increase and decrease the likelihood of a security for costs order. These factors are from Amexat paragraphs 74 and 75. The only listed factor that Mr. Drover comments on is whether the Applicants failed to apply for security for costs at the earliest convenience. Mr. Drover argues that the security for costs claim was filed 10 months after the statement of claim.
[58] In his brief, Mr. Drover stated that he has always been agreeable to pay securities for cost. Also, Mr. Drover stated in his oral submissions that he is still agreeable to paying security for costs. He has offered his Acapella shares as security for cost. In his brief, Mr. Drover stated that his “Acapella shares…are valued anywhere between $100k and $300k depending on which valuation of Acapella one believes.” However, during oral argument, he stated that the Acapella shares are worthless.
[59] Despite being agreeable to pay security for costs, Mr. Drover stated that he is somewhat reluctant to pay security for costs. His reasons are: (1) the Applicants have rejected his offers to pay security for costs prior to this application; (2) in British Columbia security for costs are rarely awarded against individual plaintiffs; (3) Mr. Drover has assets in Alberta against which the Applicants will be able to enforce their judgment. Mr. Drover claims that his numbered company is an asset he owns in Alberta. Also, he states that his house in Castlegar, British Columbia can serve as an asset because British Columbia is a reciprocating jurisdiction with Alberta; (3) Mr. Drover claims that he has enough assets to pay costs if they are ordered against him; (4) he claims that the Applicants’ case has no merit whatsoever. In particular, they have no defence to his counterclaim; (5) Mr. Drover argues that paying $300,000 in security for costs will prejudice his ability to continue his counterclaim since he has accrued hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal expenses up to date. He needs the money for living expenses.
Analysis and Decision
Issue 1: Security for Costs
[60] I accept Mr. Drover’s position that Rule 4.22 of the Rules, and not s 254 of the Business Corporations Act, is applicable in this application for security for costs. The Applicants are seeking security for costs from Mr. Drover in his personal capacity, not from a corporation. Therefore, Rule 4.22 applies. I will proceed under Rule 4.22. The five factors to be considered under Rule 4.22 are:
(a) whether it is likely the applicant for the order will be able to enforce an order or judgment against assets in Alberta;
(b) the ability of the respondent to the application to pay the costs award;
(c) the merits of the action in which the application is filed;
(d) whether an order to give security for payment of a costs award would unduly prejudice the respondent’s ability to continue the action;
(e) any other matter the Court considers appropriate.
[61] I will consider each enumerated factor, after which I will determine whether it is just and reasonable to order security for costs in the circumstances.
(a) Likelihood of Enforcing an Order or Judgment Against Assets in Alberta
[62] Based on the evidence provided by Mr. Drover, he owns no exigible property in Alberta. His Alberta numbered company, being incorporated, is shielded from any judgment or order made against him personally. All the rest of his declared assets are held outside of Alberta. This factor favours an order for security for costs.
(b) Ability to Pay Costs
[63] Mr. Drover claims to have sufficient assets to pay any costs award. He therefore argues that the Applicants have not established that he cannot pay any potential costs award. This is true. In fact, the Applicants agree that Mr. Drover has sufficient assets to pay any costs award. The Applicants argue that Mr. Drover’s ability to pay the costs award supports the order for security for costs. However, the Applicants are mistaken.
[64] The party seeking security for costs bears the initial onus to establish, on a balance of probabilities, that the respondent will be unable to pay its costs if the defence is successful. If the applicant satisfies this onus, the evidentiary burden shifts to the respondent to show why the Court should not exercise its discretion to make such an order against it: Amex; Provalcid.
[65] Therefore, the Applicants are incorrect to state that Mr. Drover’s ability to pay for costs favours an order for security for costs. It does not. Mr. Drover’s ability to pay costs disfavours an order for security for costs. Had this application fallen under s 254 of the Business Corporations Act, Mr. Drover’s ability to pay costs would have been determinative – for the sole criterion under s 254 of the Business Corporations Act is whether the respondent “will be unable to pay the costs.” However, this application is being made under Rule 4.22.
[66] Under Rule 4.22, I need only consider Mr. Drover’s ability to pay costs – after which I must determine whether it is just and reasonable to order security for costs. The ability to pay costs is one factor to consider under Rule 4.22 and is not determinative. This principle is from Autoweld Systems Ltd v CRC-Evans Pipeline International Inc, 2011 ABQB 265, 504 AR 288, where Justice McMahon stated:
I need not determine that …[the Plaintiff] "will be unable to pay the costs". The mandate is merely to consider the ability of …[the Plaintiff] to pay in determining what is just and reasonable.
[67] Therefore, while both parties admit that Mr. Drover can pay costs, this admission does not determine the security for costs analysis. Justice McMahon continued on:
[68] As I have described, the Plaintiff is not insolvent…. Nevertheless, the modest net assets of …[the Plaintiff] suggests a real risk of an inability to pay substantial costs after protracted and expensive litigation. What is a viable business today may not be so at the end of this litigation.
[69] These words are very apt to the present situation. I do not see Mr. Drover’s current ability to pay costs as indicative that he will be able to pay costs in the future – nor do I consider this factor to be determinative in the analysis.
(c) Merits of the Action
[70] When considering the merits of the action “a reasonably meritorious defence, when considered together with the other factors set out in Rule 4.22, is sufficient to weigh in favour of granting security for costs. It is neither possible, nor desireable, for the Court at this stage to determine which party’s case is stronger” (AMEC at para 17).
[71] Against Mr. Drover’s claims of unpaid expenses, oppression, breach of fiduciary duties, conspiracy and defamation, the Applicants allege a number of defences, which I have listed above in paragraphs 43 to 47. While deciding nothing final with respect to the merits of these defences, these defences are all reasonably meritorious. As the Applicants have stated, I am only to consider the merits of the case “on the basis of undisputed facts, the pleadings, ...and not on the basis of seriously disputed facts or assessments of credibility” (Provalcidat para 97).
[72] Against Mr. Drover’s claim of oppression, the Applicants put forward the business judgment rule defence. Mr. Drover argues that Chapman Engineering and MNP were colluding with the Applicants to ruin his company. Therefore, the advice Chapman Engineering and MNP gave to the Applicants was, according to Mr. Drover, not independent. However, whether or not the advice was independent is not for me to presently decide. Based on the pleadings of the Applicants, the business judgment rule is a meritorious defence. The same applies to the other defences put forward by the Applicants.
[73] For their defence against the claim of conspiracy, the Applicants claim that they had a statutory right to requisition board members to have a shareholder meeting to remove Mr. Drover as a director. The Applicants further claim that Mr. Drover’s mismanagement of EOGL was sufficient cause to seek his removal as a director. Based on undisputed facts, the Applicants had a statutory right under s 142 of the Business Corporations Act to requisition board members to hold a meeting to remove Mr. Drover as a board member. Based on the facts pled by the Applicants, they had sufficient grounds to call the meeting. Therefore, they have a reasonably meritorious defence against the claim of conspiracy.
[74] Against the claims of defamation, the Applicants argue that they have defences pursuant to the principles of justification, fair comment and qualified privilege. Again, based on undisputed facts and on the facts which the Applicants pled, the Applicants were directors making representations to shareholders on the state of EOGL. Therefore, the defences are reasonably meritorious. Since the Applicants’ defences are reasonably meritorious, this factor favours an order for security for costs.
(d) Undue Prejudice
[75] Mr. Drover also claims that “paying significant security for costs of $300k” would prejudice his ability to continue his counterclaim. However, Mr. Drover does not object to paying some amount of security for cost. His true objection lies in the amount the order should be for, not whether the order should be made. Therefore, I do not find there will be any undue prejudice in making a security for costs order.
[76] Also, Mr. Drover has stated that he would be able to pay any costs award made against him. I am not sure how he can pay any order for costs, but would be unduly prejudiced by an order to pay security for costs. Lastly, based on the evidence given by Mr. Drover, he currently has assets in excess of $800,000. These funds seem sufficient to continue his counterclaim, even in spite of a security for costs order made against him.
(e) Other Factors
[77] Both parties have mentioned several other factors that I will consider. I do not see the need to consider any other factors not mentioned by either party.
[78] Mr. Drover alleged that the Applicants delayed in bringing this application. He states that the security for costs claim was filed 10 months after the statement of claim. It should be noted that the security for costs application was made in response to the counterclaim, which was filed 2.5 months after the statement of claim was filed. Therefore, the alleged delay was 7.5 months, not 10 months.
[79] However, Mr. Drover does not argue that the alleged delay resulted in any sort of prejudice. From Pocklington Foods Inc v Alberta (Provincial Treasurer), 1994 CanLII 18373 (AB KB), 153 AR 288 at para 9 (ABQB), [1994] AWLD 436 [Pocklington]:
Even if there has been some delay on the part of the defendant in the present case, the order should be granted unless the plaintiff shows that it suffered some prejudice from the delay, or was induced into believing it was safe in incurring costs without risking facing an order for security for costs.
[80] Since the alleged delay in bringing this application did not produce any prejudice, and since the Applicants are not seeking security for steps already taken, the delay does not weigh against ordering security for costs.
[81] Mr. Drover also argued that he has offered his Acapella shares to the Applicants as security for cost. His offer was allegedly rejected. While I make no finding with respect to the nature of the Acapella shares, Mr. Drover’s assertion during his oral argument that his Acapella shares are worthless largely explains why the Applicants would not accept his offer. Therefore, the fact that Mr. Drover offered his Acapella shares as security for costs does not weigh against ordering security for costs.
[82] The Applicants, citing Provalcid, have put forward three additional factors for my consideration. The factors are (a) whether the application was brought at the earliest opportunity, (b) whether the applicant seeks security for steps already taken and (c) whether the resolution of the issues is important to the community.
[83] Based on Provalcid, the timeliness of the application weighs in favour of ordering security for costs. I find there is not enough information to make a determination as to the timeliness of the application. Also, as I mentioned above, Mr. Drover did not experience any prejudice with respect to the timeliness or untimeliness of this application. Therefore, this particular factor does not favour or disfavor the application.
[84] The Applicants are not seeking security for any step taken to date in this matter. Based on Provalcid, this factor favours ordering security for costs.
[85] Lastly, I agree with the Applicants that the resolution of this dispute is not important to the greater community. This is a private dispute. Based on Provalcid, this factor favours ordering security for costs.
(f) Just and Reasonable
[86] My decision on security for costs is discretionary; however, this discretion must be the product of a rational process (Amexat para 71).
[87] In this particular case, I find that it is just and reasonable to order Mr. Drover to pay security for costs. Mr. Drover has no exigible assets in Alberta. Therefore, there is the possibility that he could escape payment of costs if the Applicants successfully defend this action. The Applicants have a meritorious defence and Mr. Drover would not suffer undue prejudice if security for costs was ordered. Lastly, Mr. Drover himself has stated that he is amenable to paying security for costs. For all of these reasons, I find that it is just and reasonable to order security for costs.
Issue 2: Amount of Security for Costs
[88] The Applicants seek $300,000 for security for costs on a solicitor-client basis. Alternatively, they seek $200,000 on a party-party basis.
[89] Alberta courts have stated that security for costs can be awarded on a solicitor-client basis where it is likely that the costs will be awarded on a solicitor-client basis (Hamza v Hamza, 1997 ABCA 263 at para 17, 200 AR 342; Canada Deposit Insurance Corp v Canadian Commercial Bank, 1989 ABCA 150 at paras 24 – 26, 61 DLR (4th) 161; Prairie Land Corp v Concert Properties Ltd, 2004 ABQB 726 at para 14, 364 AR 283).
[90] In arguing that the security for costs order should be made on a solicitor-client basis, the Applicants rely on the factors set out in Pillarat paragraph 2. These factors are:
a) engaged in blameworth conduct during the trial;
b) unduly prolonged the trial;
c) was guilty of misconduct prior to the litigation;
d) alleged fraud and failed to prove it; and
e) that justice would be served by such an award.
[91] I find that these factors are not applicable to the present application. Two of the factors listed involve trial behaviour. The fourth factor, an unproven accusation of fraud, is particularly problematic as fraud forms one of the very causes of action Mr. Drover is pleading. The cause of action pled by Mr. Drover cannot be used by the Applicants as evidence justifying solicitor-client costs – especially when the claim has not been tried on its merits. Also, assessing these factors prior to trial delves too deeply into the merits of this case. At this point, such a determination would be premature.
[92] Otherwise, cases have cited the principle that the amount of security should cover the probable costs of the suit. (ArcelorMittal Tubular Products Roman SA v Canadian Natural Resources Ltd, 2010 ABQB 552 at para 31, 503 AR 391; Pocklingtonat para 20; Home Exchange (Alberta) Ltd v Goodyear Canada Inc, 2001 ABQB 673 at para 14, 291 AR 295).
[93] I find that security for costs should be made on a party-party basis. Obviously, my decision has no bearing on the trial judge’s decision on costs.
[94] The Applicants allege that they will incur $200,000 in party-party costs on a go-forward basis. The amount cited in the Applicants’ draft bill of costs is $101,500. They argue that party-party costs should be awarded as a multiple of the draft bill of costs. However, I do not think this is a case where it would be appropriate to order costs based on a multiple of the draft bill of costs. Rather, costs should be based on a single set of Schedule C costs.
[95] Given the fact that Mr. Drover has claimed approximately $1,150,000.00 in damages, Schedule C costs should be calculated based on Column 4. The Applicants’ bill of costs is at the high end of the scale. In particular, the estimated length of trial and discovery are at the high end of the scale. Also, several expenses included in the bill of costs have already been incurred. Therefore, I have adjusted the bill of costs accordingly. These adjustments reduce the bill of costs to $50,000.
[96] Lastly, the Applicants did not discount the oppression claim in their bill of costs. Due to s 243 of the Business Corporations Act, security for costs cannot be received for oppression claims. Therefore, the security for costs should be discounted to account for the oppression claim. If the Court can reasonably determine what percentage of the action involves the oppression claim, security for costs may be awarded for the non-oppression portions of the plaintiff's claim (Vaasjo v Jurina, 2016 ABQB 78 at para 22). In this case, the oppression claim is clearly distinguishable from Mr. Drover’s other claims. Without more information provided, I am left to assume that all claims would require approximately equal costs. Therefore, as Mr. Drover has five claims, I will discount the security required by 20% to account for the oppression claim.
[97] Based on the above adjustments, I find that party-party costs are most accurately estimated at $40,000. The security for costs order will reflect that amount.
Conclusion
[98] The Applicants’ application is granted and the following relief is order:
1. The Respondent, Mr. Drover, is required to post security for costs for the trial of his counterclaim against the Applicants in the amount of $40,000 within two months of this decision.
2. The security is to be held until either the parties agree in writing otherwise or on further order of this Court.
3. Until the security is paid, all proceedings in the action are stayed.
4. If the security is not paid within the time period provided for by this decision, Mr. Drover’s counterclaim shall be dismissed without further notice.
[99] The Applicants are entitled to their costs of this application.
Heard on the 25th day of May, 2016.
Dated at the City of Calgary, Alberta this 28th day of July, 2016.
| J.T. McCarthy J.C.Q.B.A. |
Appearances:
Mark A. Klassen
for the Plaintiff, Emerex Oil and Gas Ltd.
David H. Drover
Self-Represented Litigant
From: David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:04 PM
Subject: YO Vincent Gircys Do you understand me now?
To: <Vincent.gircys@gmail.com>, <prontoman1@protonmail.com>, <senseirude@hotmail.com>, <newsnotnoise@protonmail.com>, <Chidakash@protonmail.com>, <paulajtucci@gmail.com>, <Tom@icareinsurance.ca>, <educatorsforhumanrights@protonmail.com>, <nancyobee@protonmail.com>, <vickie@vaccinechoicecanada.com>, <gisele@vaccinechoicecanada.com>, <tino@lcddash.com>, <anyakreynes@gmail.com>, <Shirley.guertin@protonmail.com>, <alanbrough@prontonmail.com>, <sciencej@protonmail.com>, <dione@librti.com>, <roman@librti.com>, <drpierremilot@protonmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, Marco.Mendicino <Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, fin.minfinance-financemin.fin <fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, pierre.poilievre <pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>, Katie.Telford <Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, kingpatrick278 <kingpatrick278@gmail.com>, Michael.Duheme <Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <Denis.Beaudoin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, <ngroot@investigationcounsel.com>, <tim.wilbur@keymedia.com>, <bkofman@ksvadvisory.com>, <info@nationalcitizensinquiry.ca>, jcarpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>, jagmeet.singh <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, <media.medias@fintrac-canafe.gc.ca>, blaine.higgs <blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, <jcooper@torontolegalresearch.com>, <ministryofjustice@gov.ab.ca>, <czwibel@ccla.org>, <contact@fedsforfreedom.ca>, ian <ian@mccuaiglaw.ca>, <mjackson@fieldlaw.com>, freedomreport.ca <freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, <chris.scott@whistlestoptruckstop.ca>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>, stefanos.karatopis <stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>, Lametti, David - M.P. <David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca>, <waynenarvey@hotmail.com>, <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Cc: <LGrey@gwsllp.ca>, <info@lawyers4truth.ca>, <brianpeckford@gmail.com>, <ted@vaccinechoicecanada.com>, <alanjm@idirect.com>, <benitapedersen@hotmail.com>, <KMartin@postmedia.com>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Vincent G <vincent.gircys@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 16:25:55 -0600
Subject: Re: Fw: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This
Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the
changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Cc: prontoman1@protonmail.com, waynenarvey@hotmail.com
Hello David,
I have no idea why you're sending me extensive emails relating to people
and situations I'm not involved with with no explanation or reference.
I currently have my hands full by working on matters that can make an
appreciable beneficial difference to Canadians in bringing about
accountability.
I suggest you try the appropriate social introduction to whomever your
trying to correspond with. Introduce yourself including the purpose of
contact and explain in short summary the concern you have and why your
contact might be interested including a request to delve in further
details.
As someone who gets extensive Web mail, I just can't process it all in
short order. If I tried I would be so far behind in workload I wouldn't be
able to get anything accomplished.
I hope you understand as this also applies to whoever else you may be
contacting of which some choose to proceed to use the block option.
Respectfully
Vincent Gircys
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024, 11:01 AM David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 04:00:06 +0000
> Subject: Fw: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer
> will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes,
> and sign the new or altered Retainer.
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
>
>
>
> ______________________________
> From: Dana-lee Melfi <dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
> Sent: January 29, 2024 9:59 PM
> To: Monick Grenier <monick@grenierlaw.ca>
> Subject: JCCF Portion of our current contract and This Retainer will
> not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree to the changes, and
> sign the new or altered Retainer.
>
> Hello Monick
>
> I have unanswered questions about our current retainer. I have
> "demanded" nothing. I have asked you complete your work before
> "finalization" and with several unanswered questions as your client.
> I do not have time to finish the draft of all these questions and
> requests I guess, and is of no interest now as you now have indicated
> quite abruptly and rudely.
>
> Let me make this very clear my friend. This is nothing personal.
> I have not released JCCF of their commitment and have disputed that
> JCCF has honoured their part of our current retainer.
> The excuses that were given is "they could not afford to pay private
> lawyers" and they offered an "inhouse lawyer". No other reasons given.
> This was not the case though as it was a brand-new law firm with zero
> experience as such under the licence, they operate. This made me
> question the communications the day you notified me that JCCF wants to
> change their agreement.
> I immediately tried to contact JCCF through several means and they
> would not respond. You know who did respond to me with conformation
> that JCCF will no longer help me?
> Chris Barber in writing to me. How did he even know? He described
> intimate details like them offering a new lawyer in writing to me.
> This is when I emailed you back to question these things and was met
> by a "is already done" attitude. So I had the retainer reviewed by a
> lawyer friend I have and I was advised to proceed cautiously. So I
> did.
> I reminded you of the contract in place , and specifically pointed out,
>
> 9. I understand that my matter is confidential, and that no
> information will be released to the Justice Centre except as provided
> in this Retainer.
> 10. I understand that the Lawyer’s obligations are to me, if a dispute
> arises between me and the Justice Centre.
> 11. I understand and consent that this legal payment arrangement has
> been provided to the Justice Centre.
> 12. I understand and consent that the Lawyer will provide me and the
> Justice Centre with a copy of each account due on this matter and that
> the Justice Centre will pay the said account on my behalf as well as a
> copy of this Retainer
> 13. As a condition of the Justice Centre paying my legal fees for this
> matter:
> (a) I agree to assert my constitutional and other legal rights;
> (d) I consent to the Lawyer utilizing, in regard to this matter, the
> services of other lawyers, paralegals, IT personnel and the
> communication team who work with the Justice Centre, and I consent to
> the disclosure of information related to this matter to these persons
> to the extent deemed appropriate by the Lawyer;
> (f) I agree to fully cooperate with the media and communications
> strategies approved by the Lawyer and implemented by the Justice
> Centre to publicize my matter;
> 14. If the Justice Centre does not pay the legal fee4s, I understand
> that I will be responsible to pay the legal fees.
> 17. I hereby authorize the Lawyer to discuss all aspects of this
> matter with the Justice Centre’s officers, directors, employees and
> network of volunteer legal service providers for the purpose of
> advancing the matter. Such communications shall not constitute a
> waiver of solicitor-client or litigation privilege.
> 25. I understand that this Retainer represents the whole Retainer
> between me and the Lawyer in regards to the matter.
> This Retainer will not be changed unless both the Lawyer and I agree
> to the changes, and sign the new or altered Retainer. This Retainer
> may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
> an original, but all of which together shall constitute one
> instrument. This Retainer may be executed by facsimile or PDF
> signature(s).
> 26. The laws of the Province of Ontario shall govern this Retainer.
> 27. I understand, the Lawyer is happy to answer any questions I may have.
> I may wish to have this retainer agreement reviewed by another lawyer.
> (Of which was done before I entered)
>
> I have already instructed you many times that our retainer is current
> and incomplete.
> When JCCF and John Carpay did not respond to my communications I
> secured a flight to Calgary and was going to walk in the front door of
> their head office. When they found out I was on the ground in Calgary
> I finally get a communication from their representative and he takes
> me for a lunch to explain. I did not let them out of the contract as
> they were still using my face several places online with a donate
> button even to this day 1/29/2024.
> POSTED ON: AUGUST 11, 2022
> COVID-19-NEWS-RELEASESNEWS RELEASES
> Count Days
> 536 days of advertising
> August 11, 2022 - January 29, 2024 (Page 1 missing in finalization of
> billing that shows the total paid by JCCF)
>
> https://www.jccf.ca/peace-man-
> 536 * aprox $3033.22 = $5.68 per day. I know from admissions and
> testimony that many specifically donated for my cause at JCCF within
> the first 100 days.
> And even recently.
>
> I did however agree for a consultation from this new proposed lawyer
> and firm to show my cooperation with their offer. After the
> consultation they sent me a new retainer to review. I did and also had
> it reviewed. It was NOT in my best interest to enter or even entertain
> that retainer. I informed YOU of this.
> I was never going to respond to that lawyer or firm again. A week
> later he contacted me and said he was NOT a representative of JCCF,
> when just two emails before he said he was.
> He was unethical in a very pointed and out right lie.
> You are cc'ed in that email.
> I could not take this lawyer they "offered". WE did not agree and did
> not enter into a new retainer and ours explicitly states the one we
> have is still in effect to this day 01/29/2024
> I informed you several times that the https://LSO.ca and
> https://lawsociety.mb.ca/ Had been contacted. Kings bench also
> contacted due to the seriousness beyond provincial borders on several
> lawyers under the banner of JCCF.
> I informed you of your professional standards even while asking me to
> pay an amount of $10,000.
> I informed you of my faith in you and trust you will do your job "to
> the best of your abilities" and told you I do not wish for another
> lawyer and give the courts any excuse to delay.
> I refused all "deals" and again informed you I would not plead guilty
> to any wrongdoing. I asked you to put in a late disclosure
> application. I asked to review any material you were going to share
> with the courts after you did not let me review the Charter
> Application.
> After shadowing up and ready on Jan 22 and making myself available for
> two hours before the 10"00 am scheduled time there was no Judge and no
> written explanation from the courts to me as to why. I asked for this.
> I questioned why my lawyer would not question this before first
> adjournment on that day.
> I waited until 2 pm and again no Judge and adjourned to Jan 23 10"00 am.
> Again I was ready and no Judge and not questioned on record.
> A colleague of mine contacted you in advocation asking you to review
> something before returning to court. David Amos.
> He was met with dismissal. You never asked or contacted me to ask if
> this was in fact a colleague or friend.
> This is quite important as you say that the Charter Application
> Challenge was a key factor in the decision.
> There were other key factors. David contacted many people over several
> months and waited for responses. He never contacted me and did his
> entire investigation from my online presence and seen what I was on
> too for the security of Canada. In those communications you can find
> all here at this link below.
> There was no Judge because there were none that would take the seat
> after these communications is an avenue we are exploring with the
> courts through the transcripts and communications. The EMA being
> deemed illegal had zero baring on my case. We both know the courts
> seen how serious I was and did not want this case to be heard.
> They know of the investigation I have been on. Despite me eluding to
> it many times to you, you have yet to question or try and understand
> the magnitude.
>
> On Jan 23 2024 I brought a witness to court from NCI. She also
> witnessed our communications outside the court room.
> What had NCI interested is they have representatives that have
> attended almost all cases regarding the protests and invocation of the
> Mandates and EMA in their own investigation.
> The representative that showed has never seen a case where a planned
> trial and no judge available.
> You are on the legal defence for Tamara and Chris Barber. We had to
> have many discussions about your client sabotaging my fundraising in
> more than one spot. None of them actually done by me but good
> Canadians that wanted to support me. You still allowed for it to
> happen and it hurt me. I told you, I do not wish you any harm. But you
> allowed harm and now asking me for payment.
> After my case was withdrawn I spent two days finally disclosing my
> investigation to NCI with hundreds of documents and, video, and
> testimony on how the protest of 2022 was infiltrated and the public
> defrauded and deceived.
> Plainly. On Feb 7th 2022 a Corporation was formed that placed demands
> on a five eyes country. If the Government would have even responded
> then a precedent would be set. Therefore the citizen led movement and
> their voices were stollen and premeditated. There were and are, far
> more than me working on this and there will be many more to testify in
> accordance to this.
> The money donated was always to be subverted and never to reach the
> intended recipients. and much more.
> The conspiracy charges will be investigated in a new way now. The
> Police have all the evidence that Freedom Corp and 53 other
> influencers and members of MSM in Canada were aware that lawyers for
> JCCF facilitated a media and propaganda control room for clients with
> court conditions and against those conditions. The Police notified and
> given evidence (Blonde) withheld this evidence even while under oath
> in his testimony before the courts. Has still yet to inform or share
> this evidence to date.
>
> Want to share that I am well aware that JCCF has paid a "private
> lawyer", yourself, just as recent as the date you want to abruptly end
> our contract with a quick finalization.
> Page 1 of the 2024-01-27 MELFI ACCOUNT 1414 PDF is missing. (incomplete
> work)
> I wish to have a detailed full account of the payments for your
> services from the start of our retainer to todays date. I told you we
> will be sending the bill to JCCF first and if they refuse to pay then
> the next step is to pay it with the trust in place when I hold them
> accountable. I advised you that if it came down to it I would pay from
> my life insurance if I was allowed to withdraw and not affect my
> lawsuit (DANA-LEE vs GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN).
>
> I ask you if you are the lawyer for Wayne Narvey?
> You have a retainer with him as a personal lawyer with JCCF as the
> payee correct?
> His court is now complete. And JCCF has confirmed they would pay. I
> also have an admission from Wayne that this is the case. (pictures
> attached)
> They have also paid much to others private lawyers. This raises some
> ethical questions on their actions and explanations to me.
>
> Before I continue Monick I ask you to complete our business and
> contract with answering some questions, providing some services that
> have now arisen due to the oddness of the courts actions. To remain
> loyal to your client that has obeyed all Rights and Freedoms under the
> law. That has paid and treated you with respect.
>
> There are much more intelligent people than I that have been watching
> every social communication and7or Government submissions that I have
> initiated since the days before my stance. The questions and
> investigation that I have been involved with and "I stood in peace on
> these filed documents within the law at all times".
> No Judge within their ethics would ever try my case for a reason. They
> are not only aware of my strong defence, but also aware of the
> investigations I am involved with.
> They were all notified long before my trial date. There are even
> responses from many acknowledging receipt. All 338 of the house of
> commons were notified and possible cabinet meetings associated. The
> Chief of defence notified and etc. Right up to our Prime Minister.
>
> https://davidraymondamos3.blog
>
> I am staying in Ottawa to do some follow up and am able to have a
> meeting with you.
> A call would be insufficient and communications in email seem to be
> misunderstood.
> I am available at your earliest convenience and need to get to a
> finalisation to submit my bill to JCCF. The trust is to be returned to
> an account until such time as I agree to release it.
> I must in the end advise the donors that the money they have sent was
> accounted for as I promised.
> I want you to understand the seriousness and not discount it as "an
> issue between JCCF and I".
> It is also your issue in your new corporation. When we entered our
> agreement, you were a sole proprietorship.
> I am giving you a chance to rectify the mistakes made and continue to
> honour our current retainer.
>
> Thank you,
> Dana-lee Melfi
>
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Chrystia Freeland <Chrystia.Freeland@fin.gc.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:25 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.
Le ministère des Finances Canada accuse réception de votre courriel.
Nous vous assurons que vos commentaires sont les bienvenus.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Carpay <jcarpay@jccf.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:23 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for contacting me. I am away from the office until Monday
February 5, not able to check email regularly.
For media queries please email media@jccf.ca.
If you need legal assistance, please go to "get legal help" at
www.jccf.ca<http://www.jccf.ca
Justice Centre's legal team requires that requests for legal
assistance be in writing, and does not deal with initial requests by
phone.
For all other inquiries, please contact info@jccf.ca.
Sincerely,
John Carpay, B.A., LL.B.
President
Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Katherine Kowalchuk <info@lawyers4truth.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:22 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Given the volume of messages we are
receiving at this time, we may not be able to respond to you in a
timely manner. We thank you for your understanding.
Sincerely,
Lawyers 4 Truth
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:52:21 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Announcement from Vincent Gircys.
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.c
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
From: Dana-lee Melfi<dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: RE The "Peace-Man" returns to court in Ottawa on Monday Correct?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>
 |
In 2022 I stood in peace and promoted peace in a court ordered legal
protest. I was unlawfully arrested, searched, seizure and detainment,
and charged with f... |
Sent: January 22, 2024 11:07 AM
To:Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com<Dana_lee_ca@hotmail.com>; monick@grenierlaw.ca<monick@grenierlaw.ca>; pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>; ps.ministerofpublicsafety-
Subject: RE The "Peace-Man" returns to court in Ottawa on Monday Correct?
my work about war etc
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 04:59:35 -0300
Subject: YO Minister Marco Mendicino Methinks its High Time that you
and I create a MOU N'esy Pas Ian Nunn???
To: bestdamnroofer@hotmail.com, freedomcentralcanada@gmail.com
"Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu
<mcu@justice.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "Katie.Telford"
<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy
<traversy.n@gmail.com>, sheilagunnreid <sheilagunnreid@gmail.com>,
"stefanos.karatopis"<stefanos.karatopis@gmail.com>
<davesteenburg269@gmail.com>, "freedomreport.ca"
<freedomreport.ca@gmail.com>, Viva Frei <david@vivafrei.com>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
"Brenda.Lucki"<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Hogan"
<Bill.Hogan@gnb.ca>, natasha.calvinho@gmail.com, "Mark.Blakely"
<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Mike.Comeau"<Mike.Comeau@gnb.ca>,
"Anita.Anand"<Anita.Anand@parl.gc.ca>,
"fin.minfinance-financemin.
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
<Chrystia.Freeland@parl.gc.ca>
<Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>,
"pierre.poilievre"<pierre.poilievre@parl.gc.ca>,
maverickmultimedia@mail.com, inunn@superaje.com,
artinfo6@digitaldoor.net, temp3@digitaldoor.net
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
livefromtheshed2022@gmail.com, freedom2canada@outlook.com,
gregory.re@fox.com, Cmd4pc@gmail.com, james@jamesbowielaw.com,
ontario@cp.org, JustinWells@foxnews.com, ottawanews@ctv.ca,
Michael.Kempa@uottawa.ca, drkempa@gmail.com
https://na01.safelinks.
David Raymond Amos’s Tweets
·
Apr 6
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @DanDonovan4 and 42 others
YO @realGonzaloLira
Go Figure why the link I offered you within @YouTube was blocked
https://na01.safelinks.
#UkraineRussianWar #cdnpoli
366 Comments
David Amos
Say Hoka Hey to NATO or me
https://na01.safelinks.
youtube.com
Vanished: Is There a NATO General In Mariupol?
A good introduction to the entire Skripal affair, and the unanswered
questions: https://na01.safelinks.
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @DanDonovan4 and 44 others
I heard through the grapevine that you ain't dead yet but have been
muzzled bigtime
#UkraineRussianWar #cdnpoli
Too bad so sad that these dudes were not honest with mean old me just
you dudes never were EH? @ikwilson @wikileaks @guardian @ggreenwald
https://na01.safelinks.
youtube.com
FOOD PLANT FIRES: LIVE NEWS COVERAGE...THE CONSPIRACY...THE SHORTAGES
Freedom Reporter and researcher Ian Nunn joins the conversation with
the newest data surrounding a bizarre chain of Food Processing Plant
fires across the U....
Mar 26
Gonzalo Lira
@realGonzaloLira
You want to learn the truth about the Zelensky regime? Google these names:
Vlodymyr Struk
Denis Kireev
Mikhail & Aleksander Kononovich
Nestor Shufrych
Yan Taksyur
Dmitri Djangirov
Elena Berezhnaya
If you haven’t heard from me in 12 hours or more, put my name on this list.
GL
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @realGonzaloLira
This was the last I heard from you
https://na01.safelinks.
youtube.com
Scott Ritter and The Battle of the Donbas
My Telegram channel: https://na01.safelinks.
https://na01.safelinks.
content: https://na01.safelinks.
https://na01.safelinks.
Monday, 26 April 2021
YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO dudes and
YOU know that I don't send Spam
https://na01.safelinks.
Ready for nuclear holocaust with Russia over Ukraine?
100,941 views
•Apr 16, 2021
5.2K160Share
Save
Tulsi Gabbard
Are we prepared to see our loved ones burn alive in a nuclear
holocaust in a war with Russia over Ukraine? If not, cut out the macho
saber rattling and deescalate before it's too late.
2,080 Comments
David Amos
David Amos
Why did you ignore me when you were running for Presidential Office???
https://na01.safelinks.
https://na01.safelinks.
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @JonathanVize
We just talked about this video that you dudes published Please say Hey to
@HarjitSajjan and the Boyz for me will ya?
https://na01.safelinks.
Canada on alert as Russia military moves into Arctic
846,650 views
Apr 7, 2021
Inside The Story
The Russian military has built a network of bases and stations along
its northern coast in recent years, while developing new weapons that
could hit North America.
3,852 Comments
David Amos
David Amos
Hmmmm
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 23:52:37 -0300
Subject: I trust that his minion Mark Koneda of US Naval Intel and his
FBI pals know why I had no respect for their Biden's old buddy Rep.
Alcee Hastings for rather obvious reasons
To: Dawn.McArdle@mail.house.gov, Matt.Gaetz@mail.house.gov,
bgordon@anchorsgordon.com, patrick.parsons@mail.house.gov
nia_ig.fct@navy.mil, art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, "Greta.Bossenmaier"
<Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int
<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>,
"steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, "rob.moore"
<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
"robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, washington field
<washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, "Ian.Shugart"
<Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>, premier
<premier@ontario.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, PREMIER
<PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier
<premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, Office
of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki"
<Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"
<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "fin.minfinance-financemin.
<fin.minfinance-financemin.
https://na01.safelinks.
Rep. Alcee Hastings dies, narrowing Democratic House majority to just 7
Published Tue, Apr 6 202110:44 AM EDTUpdated Tue, Apr 6 20214:01 PM EDT
Christian Nunley
@cnunley7
Share
Key Points
Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., died Tuesday at age 84 after a
two-year bout with pancreatic cancer.
Democrats now hold a narrower margin in the House, with a 218-211
split, while six vacant seats remain.
Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., listens to students speak about their
experiences with gun violence during the The Gun Violence Prevention
Task Force panel Wednesday afternoon May 23, 2018.
Sarah Silbiger | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images
Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., died Tuesday after a more than two-year
bout with pancreatic cancer, NBC News confirmed.
Hastings, who served in the House for nearly three decades, was 84.
Throughout his career, he held several key committee assignments and
leadership positions, most recently as vice chairman of the rules
committee. He had also been Florida’s first Black federal trial judge,
appointed to the bench in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter.
“As an attorney, civil rights activist and judge, and over his nearly
thirty years in Congress, he fought tirelessly to create opportunities
to lift up working families, communities of color, children and
immigrants,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote in a statement.
President Joe Biden reacted to Hastings’ death on Tuesday afternoon.
“Across his long career of public service, Alcee always stood up to
fight for equality, and always showed up for the working people he
represented,” he said in a statement. “Jill and I are saddened to
learn of his passing.”
Democrats now hold a narrower advantage in the House, 218-211, giving
the party a smaller margin of error in passing legislation. Six seats
are vacant, four of which were previously held by Democrats and two by
Republicans.
Three of the four Democratic House seats were vacated by appointments
to positions in President Joe Biden’s Cabinet. Deb Haaland, of New
Mexico, was appointed secretary of the Department of Interior; Marcia
Fudge, of Ohio, was named head of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development, and Cedric Richmond, of Louisiana, became senior advisor
to the president and director of the White House Office of Public
Engagement.
One of the two vacant GOP seats is no longer up for contest. Julia
Letlow of Louisiana was elected in late March but has yet to be sworn
in. Julia will replace her late husband, Luke Letlow, who was elected
to the seat but died before being sworn in due to Covid-19
complications.
In 1983, when Hastings was a federal judge, he was acquitted in
criminal court on a charge of conspiring to solicit a bribe in
exchange for leniency in a sentencing.
Alcee Hastings testifying at his impeachment trial in 1989.
Michael Jenkins | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images
Nevertheless, the House impeached Hastings in 1988 amid accusations
that he perjured himself during that criminal trial. The Senate voted
to convict him, removing him from the bench, but did not vote to
disqualify him from holding future office.
Hastings appealed the impeachment conviction in 1992. A federal judge
overturned the conviction, on the grounds that a 12-member Senate
committee, rather than the full Senate, conducted the impeachment
trial. This was the first time a Senate conviction was overturned by a
federal judge.
The next year, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled federal courts do not have
the authority to review the procedures of a Senate impeachment trial.
Hastings’ legislative career, which began with his election in 1992
and continued until his death, was unaffected by the decision.
On 4/6/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:03:08 +0000
> Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie
> Cooper made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas
> Howie Anglin?
> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>
> Dear David Amos,
> The Naval Intelligence Activity (NIA) Office of the Inspector General
> (IG) reviewed your email and attached .WAV file provided to the NIA
> Hotline on 2 April 2021. I found no connection to the United States
> Navy or United States Naval Intelligence.
>
> Naval Inspectors General exist to improve the efficiency and
> effectiveness of US Navy Programs, and strive to eliminate and prevent
> waste, fraud, and abuse with their respective departments. Naval IGs
> are restricted to assessing matters falling within the purview of
> their respective commanders.
>
> Citing the lack of an apparent connection to the US Navy or Naval
> Intelligence, I am unable to provide further assistance, or provide
> direct referral to any other agency or activity.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Mark Koneda
> Investigator
> Naval Intelligence Activity
> Office of the Inspector General
> NIA_IG@navy.mil
> (301)669-3030 (unclass)
> TSVOIP 560-3030
>
> INSPECTOR GENERAL SENSITIVE INFORMATION - FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY The
> information contained in this email and any accompanying attachments
> may contain Inspector General sensitive or pre-decisional information,
> which is protected from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of
> Information Act (FOIA, 5 USC Section 552). It should not be released
> to unauthorized persons. If you are not the intended recipient of this
> information, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of
> any action in reliance on this information is prohibited. If you
> received this email in error, please notify this office by email or by
> calling (301) 669-3030.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> Sent: Friday, April 2, 2021 12:50 PM
> To: NIA_IG <nia_ig.fct@navy.mil>
> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Non-DoD Source] Fwd: Methinks the evil lawyer Howie Cooper
> made a deal with the VERY NASTY FBI dudes in Beantown N'esy Pas Howie
> Anglin?
Friday, 2 April 2021
Russia warns NATO against deploying troops to Ukraine
https://na01.safelinks.
Image
David Raymond Amos
@DavidRaymondAm1
Replying to @DavidRaymondAm1 @Nyonitz and 49 others
NATO has been picking a fight long before this weekend but big media
ain't been saying much about it until now Methinks it was no
coincidence US Naval Intel people called me on Good Friday N'esy Pas?
https://na01.safelinks.
#nbpoli #cdnpoli #CORRUPTION
https://na01.safelinks.
Ukraine says Russia massing troops on border; U.S. warns Moscow
Dmytro Gorshkov
AFP Staff
Agence France-Presse’s network of 201 bureaus covers 151 countries,
with 80 nationalities represented among its 2,400 collaborators. AFP
is a global news agency delivering in-depth coverage of the events
shaping our world from conflicts to politics, economics, sports,
entertainment and the latest breakthroughs in health, science and
technology.
The Agency operates regional hubs in five geographical zones: Africa,
North America, Latin America, Asia, Middle East
Published Thursday, April 1, 2021 4:09PM EDT
Ukraine
Ukraine has been locked in a conflict with Russian-backed separatists
since 2014. (AFP)
KYIV, UKRAINE -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday
accused Moscow of building up troops on his country's border as the
United States warned Russia against "intimidating" Ukraine.
Kiev has been locked in a conflict with Russian-backed separatists
since 2014, and this week Ukrainian officials reported Russian troop
movement in annexed Crimea and on the border, near territories
controlled by Moscow-backed separatists.
On Thursday, Zelensky's ministers discussed the escalating security
situation with Western allies including U.S. Secretary of Defence
Lloyd Austin.
"Muscle-flexing in the form of military exercises and possible
provocations along the border are traditional Russian games," Zelensky
said in a statement.
He accused Moscow of seeking to create "a threatening atmosphere" as
Kiev hopes to resume a ceasefire brokered last year.
The U.S. State Department said it was "absolutely concerned by recent
escalations of Russian aggressive and provocative actions in eastern
Ukraine."
"What we would object to are aggressive actions that have an intent of
intimidating, of threatening, our partner Ukraine," State Department
spokesman Ned Price told reporters.
Some observers say the reported Russian troop buildup is a test for
the administration of U.S. President Joe Biden, who caused an uproar
in Moscow last month by calling his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin
a "killer".
This week, Moscow and Kyiv blamed each other for a rise in violence
between government forces and Kremlin-backed separatists in eastern
Ukraine, which has undermined the ceasefire.
Zelensky said 20 Ukrainian servicemen had been killed and 57 wounded
since the start of the year.
Separately, the military announced that a Ukrainian soldier was
wounded in an attack it blamed on separatists.
'READY FOR AN OFFENSIVE'
On Thursday, U.S. Secretary of Defence Austin called his Ukrainian
counterpart Andriy Taran, Ukraine's defence ministry said.
Austin said during the call that Washington would "not leave Ukraine
alone in the event of escalating Russian aggression", the ministry
said.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba for his part discussed the
"aggravation by the Russian Federation of the security situation" on
the frontline with his Canadian counterpart Marc Garneau.
Ukraine's military intelligence accused Russia of preparing to "expand
its military presence" in the separatist-controlled eastern regions of
Donetsk and Lugansk.
In a statement, the intelligence service said it "does not rule out"
an attempt by Russian forces to move "deep into Ukrainian territory".
A high-ranking Ukrainian government official, speaking on condition of
anonymity, claimed that the Russian army was practising "military
co-ordination" with separatists.
"From mid-April their combat units will be ready for an offensive,"
the official told AFP.
WEST SHOULD NOT 'WORRY'
Moscow has repeatedly denied sending troops and arms to buttress the
separatists and Putin's spokesman stressed on Thursday that Moscow is
at liberty to move troops across its territory.
"The Russian Federation moves its armed forces within its territory at
its discretion," spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters, but he did
not directly confirm a troop buildup on the Ukrainian border.
He added that "it should not worry anyone and does not pose a threat to anyone".
The war in eastern Ukraine broke out in 2014 when Russia annexed the
Crimean peninsula following a bloody uprising that ousted Ukraine's
Kremlin-friendly president Viktor Yanukovych.
On Wednesday, the Pentagon said U.S. forces in Europe had raised their
alert status following the "recent escalations of Russian aggression
in eastern Ukraine".
Mark Milley, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, also spoke
with his Russian and Ukrainian counterparts, Valery Gerasimov and
Ruslan Khomchak.
Khomchak said this week that 28,000 separatist fighters and "more than
2,000 Russian military instructors and advisers" are currently
stationed in eastern Ukraine.
On Thursday, the deputy head of Zelensky's office, Roman Mashovets,
called for joint drills with NATO forces to "help stabilise the
security situation".
Zelensky was elected in 2019 promising to end the years-long conflict,
but critics say a shaky ceasefire was his only tangible achievement.
The fighting has claimed more than 13,000 lives since 2014, according
to the United Nations.
https://na01.safelinks.
Top US national security officials call counterparts as Russia and
Ukraine tensions rise
By Oren Liebermann and Barbara Starr, CNN
Updated 8:54 PM ET, Wed March 31, 2021
An Andromeda-D automated control system takes part in an exercise held
by units of the Novorossiysk guards mountain air assault division of
the Russian Airborne Troops at Opuk range in Crimea.
An Andromeda-D automated control system takes part in an exercise held
by units of the Novorossiysk guards mountain air assault division of
the Russian Airborne Troops at Opuk range in Crimea.
(CNN)Top US national security officials have spoken with their
Ukrainian counterparts, and America's top general held a call
Wednesday with his Russian opposite number amid concern over Russian
military activity in Crimea and eastern Ukraine, including what the US
deemed a violation of a ceasefire by Moscow that led to the deaths of
four Ukrainian soldiers last week.
"Russia's destabilizing actions undermine the de-escalation intentions
that had been achieved through [last year's agreement]," chief
Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said Wednesday. "Additionally, we are
aware of Ukrainian military reports concerning Russian troop movements
on Ukraine's borders."
Secretary of State Tony Blinken reaffirmed the "unwavering support" of
the United States for Ukraine's territorial integrity in the face of
"Russia's ongoing aggression in the Donbas and Crimea," according to a
readout of his call with Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba
Wednesday. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley also
spoke to the top Ukrainian general Wednesday, while national security
adviser Jake Sullivan spoke with his Ukrainian counterpart at the
beginning of the week.
The Pentagon had grown increasingly concerned after military
intelligence reports assessed that some 4,000 heavily armed Russian
forces had been observed moving in Crimea, according to a US defense
official. "It was not totally clear what they were up to," the
official said, adding that the US now believes on further assessment
it may have been part of a Russian military exercise. Part of that
assessment was based on calls with Ukrainian officials who also viewed
the Russian activity as an exercise.
If so, the movement of so many Russian military personnel was a large
exercise and may be a deliberate message from the Kremlin to the Biden
administration about Russia's strength in the region and its ability
to challenge US allies, the official said.
This comes as NATO countries on Monday scrambled jets 10 times to
track an unusually high level of Russian military flights over a large
area of Europe including the North Sea, the Black Sea and the Baltic
Sea. NATO jets wound up conducting six intercepts in a six-hour
period.
The Biden administration is taking a tougher approach to Russia, and
Ukraine is only the latest source of tension between the two
adversaries. The White House unveiled a raft of sanctions against
Russian officials and entities at the beginning of the month over the
poisoning of opposition leader Alexey Navalny. President Joe Biden
then warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin would "pay a price"
for his efforts to undermine the 2020 US elections and went on to call
Putin a "killer." Meanwhile, the administration is expected to impose
more sanctions on Russia over election interference and the SolarWinds
cyberattack.
Classified US military war game set to take place as concerns about
threats posed by China and Russia increase
Classified US military war game set to take place as concerns about
threats posed by China and Russia increase
On Wednesday, Milley spoke with his Russian counterpart, Gen. Valery
Gerasimov. While the topics the two generals discussed have not been
made public, behind the scenes the Defense Department has been
concerned for the last several days about the build-up of Russian
troops and equipment along the Ukraine border. The Defense Department
recently raised the so-called "watch condition level" on that region
to gather updated intelligence assessments on Russian activity and
intentions, while monitoring any potential threats. The New York Times
was first to report that development.
Russia blamed Ukraine for renewed fighting in eastern Ukraine. Kremlin
spokesman Dmitry Peskov said this week that Russia was concerned about
"Ukraine's provocations," but he said he hoped it would not escalate
to fighting.
But Ukraine warned of a series of Russian violations of the ceasefire,
including two incidents of mortar fire and large-caliber machine gun
fire that led to the death of the four Ukrainian soldiers last Friday.
On Tuesday, Ukraine accused Russia of violating the ceasefire seven
times, prompting the country's parliament to call for an increase in
political and economic pressure on Moscow.
https://na01.safelinks.
NATO scrambles jets 10 times to track Russian military planes across Europe
By Barbara Starr, CNN Pentagon Correspondent
Updated 1:33 PM ET, Tue March 30, 2021
Norwegian F-16s intercepted two Russian Tu-95 bombers of the type shown here.
Norwegian F-16s intercepted two Russian Tu-95 bombers of the type shown here.
(CNN)NATO scrambled fighter jets 10 times Monday to track and
intercept an unusually "rare peak" of Russian bombers and fighters
flying over the North Sea, Black Sea and Baltic Sea, according to a
NATO official.
"NATO aircraft intercepted six different groups of Russian military
aircraft near alliance airspace in less than six hours," the
organization said in a statement.
The Russian activity across an unusually wide area of European skies
came on the same day North American Aerospace Defense Command said it
tracked Russian aircraft off the coast of Alaska.
None of the Russian aircraft entered the national airspace of NATO
nations in Europe and the intercepts were considered safe, but an
alliance statement detailed the activity.
Norwegian F-16s scrambled after radars detected two groups of Russian
military aircraft near Norway's coastline. The Norwegians intercepted
two Tu-95 Bear bombers which flew south over the North Sea. That
prompted the United Kingdom to send up Typhoon aircraft and Belgium to
deploy F-16 fighters.
The Norwegian F-16s later intercepted two Tu-160 bombers over
international waters nearby.
Separately, NATO radars detected three Russian military aircraft near
allied airspace over the Black Sea which were tracked by Turkish,
Romanian and Bulgarian fighters aircraft until they left the area.
In another encounter, NATO said Italian fighter jets intercepted a
Russian II-38 maritime patrol aircraft which was already being
escorted by Russian fighter jets over the Baltic Sea flying from
Kaliningrad.
CNN reported Saturday that the US is preparing to carry out a
classified war game this summer where a major focus of the scenarios
will be how the US should respond to aggressive action and unexpected
moves by China and Russia.
Tensions with Russia are high, and last week, Secretary of State
Antony Blinken called out Russia for "reckless and adversarial
actions" at a NATO meeting in Brussels and observed that Moscow has
"built up a forces, large scale exercises and acts of intimidation, in
the Baltic and Black Sea."
"Intercepting multiple groups of Russian aircraft demonstrates NATO
forces' readiness and capability to guard Allied skies 24 hours a day,
7 days a week, 365 days a year," Brig. Gen. Andrew Hansen, deputy
chief of staff operations at Allied Air Command, said in the NATO
statement.
NATO aircraft scrambled more than 400 times in 2020 to intercept
unknown aircraft according to the alliance. About 90 percent were in
response to flights by Russian aircraft. NATO says Russian flights
often pose a risk to civilian air traffic over Europe because the
Russians often fly without transmitting a transponder code indicating
their position and altitude and do not file a flight plan or
communicate with air traffic controllers.
Error Icon
Message blocked
Your message to pm@pm.gc.ca has been blocked. See technical details
below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to Greta.Bossenmaier@hq.nato.int has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to NIA_IG@navy.mil has been blocked. See technical
details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
Message blocked
Your message to Jim@conservativewriters.org has been blocked. See
technical details below for more information.
My message was blocked to everyone else as well Go Figure
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 15:41:27 -0400
Subject: Attn LGen Wayne Eyre I just called and tried to explain this
email and Federal Court File No T-1557-15 in particular
To: wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca, george.young@forces.gc.ca,
Vincent.Rigby@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Shelly.Bruce@cse-cst.gc.ca,
daniel.lauzon@international.
alexander.steinhouse@justica.
anne.dawson@hrsdc-rhdcc.gc.ca, marjorie.michel@tbs-sct.gc.ca,
jamie.innes@qpc-cpr.gc.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.ab.ca>, Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>,
premier <premier@gov.pe.ca>, premier <premier@gov.bc.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nt.ca>, premier
<premier@gov.yk.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, Premier
<PREMIER@novascotia.ca>, media@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Nathalie Sturgeon
<sturgeon.nathalie@
"kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Ames"
<Richard.Ames@gnb.ca>, "Richard.Bragdon"<Richard.Bragdon@parl.gc.ca>,
"Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"
<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"
<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
briangallant10 <briangallant10@gmail.com>, BrianThomasMacdonald
<BrianThomasMacdonald@gmail.
<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "robert.mckee"<robert.mckee@gnb.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
"Mark.Blakely"<Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "martin.gaudet"
<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca>
---------- Original message ----------
From: Art.McDonald@forces.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:08:24 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e
since 2015 when I was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament
and suing the Queen in Federal Court Methinks it is YOU who should
finally call me back N'esy Pas?
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
The Acting Chief of the Defence Staff is LGen Wayne Eyre, he may be
reached at wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
Le Chef d'état-major de la Défense par intérim est le LGen Wayne Eyre.
Il peut être rejoint au wayne.eyre@forces.gc.ca.
Art McD
He/Him // Il/Lui
Admiral/amiral Art McDonald
Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS)
Canadian Armed Forces
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<
Chef d’état-major de la Defense (CÉMD)
Forces armées canadiennes
art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca<
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 13:08:16 -0400
Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE You have been ducKing e since 2015 when I
was running iN the election of the 42nd Parliament and suing the Queen
in
who should finally call me back N'esy Pas?
To: art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca, richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca,
JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca,
Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca, Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca,
Derek.Sloan@parl.gc.ca, Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca,
Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca,
dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
<andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca>
Marwan.Tabbara@parl.gc.ca, Yasmin.Ratansi@parl.gc.ca,
Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news-tips
<news-tips@nytimes.com>, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
ombudsman-communications@
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 17:01:09 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON
STALKER, all the NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
Admiral Art McDonald is now the Chief of the Defence Staff, he may be
reached at art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. I will continue to monitor this
account periodically until my retirement from the Canadian Armed
Forces. Please reach out to EA CDS, LCol Richard Jolette at
richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca if you require to get a hold of me.
L'amiral Art McDonald est maintenant le Chef d'état-major de la
Défense, on peut le joindre au art.mcdonald@forces.gc.ca. Je
continuerai de surveiller ce compte périodiquement jusqu'à ma retraite
des Forces armées canadiennes. Veuillez contacter CdeC CEMD, Lcol
Richard Jolette au richard.jolette@forces.gc.ca si vous avez besoin de
me contacter.
On 3/11/21, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 12:35:27 -0400
> Subject: Re: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>
> Cc: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca, "erin.otoole"<erin.otoole@parl.gc.ca>,
> "Katie.Telford"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>, "jagmeet.singh"
> <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
> "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>
>
> https://na01.safelinks.
>
>
> Prosecuting high-ranking officers a 'significant challenge'
>
> "Retired colonel and lawyer Michel Drapeau, who is a leading expert in
> military justice, said he wonders how a court martial could hear a
> case involving Vance or McDonald when no one in the military,
> including judges, would outrank them."
>
> PERHAPS I SHOULD SUE THEM EH???
>
> On 9/23/19, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Byrne Furlong
>> Press Secretary
>> Office of the Minister of National Defence
>> 613-996-3100
>>
>> Media Relations
>> Department of National Defence
>> 613-996-2353
>> mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:14:23 -0300
>> Subject: Fwd: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the
>> NATO dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>> To: Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca, Walter.Semianiw@mdlo.ca, Newsroom
>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>
>> Peter Stoffer
>> STRATEGIC ADVISOR
>>
>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>>
>>
>>
>> Mr. Stoffer served as a Member of Parliament for the riding of
>> Sackville-Eastern Shore from 1997 to 2015. During 2011-2015, he served
>> as the Official Opposition Critic for Veterans Affairs.
>>
>> During this time, Mr. Stoffer was honoured with a variety of awards
>> from the environmental, military, provincial and federal communities.
>> He was named Canada’s Parliamentarian of the year 2013, and he
>> received the Veterans Ombudsman award. Mr Stoffer has been knighted
>> into the Order of St. George and has also been knighted by the King of
>> the Netherlands into the Order of Orange Nassau.
>>
>> He is currently volunteering for a variety of veteran organizations.
>> He is also host to a radio show called “Hour of Heroes in Nova Scotia”
>> on Community Radio, Radio Station 97-5 CIOE-FM, the Voice of the East
>> Coast Music.
>>
>>
>> Colonel-Maître® Michel William Drapeau
>> SENIOR COUNSEL
>> (613) 236-2657 x200
>> Michel.Drapeau@mdlo.ca
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 13:43:40 -0300
>> Subject: YO JONATHAN.VANCE I trust that MASON STALKER, all the NATO
>> dudes and YOU know that I don't send Spam
>> To: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"
>> <Gilles.Moreau@forces.gc.ca>, stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, ombudsman-communications@
>> "Paul.Shuttle"<Paul.Shuttle@pco-bcp.gc.ca>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 16:38:01 +0000
>> Subject: Automatic reply: [SUSPECTED SPAM / SPAM SUSPECT] A little
>> Deja Vu for JONATHAN.VANCE et al
>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Good day,
>>
>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>> has not been forwarded.
>>
>> Please forward your email to: stalker.mason@hq.nato.int
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>>
>> MJS
>>
>>
>> On 9/23/19, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: MASON.STALKER@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 12:04:41 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks its obvious why the Crown would
>>> drop the charges after Mark Norman's lawyers hit Trudeau and his buddy
>>> Butts with subpoenas N'esy Pas/
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good day,
>>>
>>> Please note that I do not have regular access to DWAN and your email
>>> has not been forwarded.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: JONATHAN.VANCE@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:35 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>> To: motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>>
>>> I will be out of the office until 23 February 2016. I am unable to
>>> monitor my e-mail during this time. For urgent matters, please contact
>>> my Chief of Staff, BGen Tammy Harris (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), or
>>> my EA, Maj Cedric Aspirault (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
>>> whom can contact me.
>>>
>>> Je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 23 février 2016. Il ne me sera pas
>>> possible de vérifier mes couriels pendant cette période. En cas
>>> d'urgence, veuillez contacter ma chef d'état major, Bgén Tammy Harris
>>> (Tammy.Harris@forces.gc.ca), ou mon CdC, le maj Cédric Aspirault
>>> (Cedric.Aspirault@forces.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Chisholm, Jill"<Jill.Chisholm@justice.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:34 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: I see that the the evil blogger in Alberta
>>> Barry Winters aka Mr Baconfat is still practising libel and hate
>>> speech contrary to Sections 300 and 319 0f the Canadian Criminal Code
>>> N'esy Pas Mr Prime Minister Trudeau "The Younger" ???
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your message. I will be away from the office until
>>> Friday, February 26, 2016 and will not be accessing email frequently
>>> during this time. Should you require assistance please contact
>>> Jacqueline Fenton at (902) 426-6996. Otherwise I will be pleased to
>>> respond to your message upon my return.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Ministerial Correspondence Unit - Justice Canada
>>> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 16:46:28 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YOr Ralph Goodale Methinks this should
>>> stress the Integrity of the Globe and Mail and your minions in the
>>> RCMP N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable David Lametti, Minister of
>>> Justice and Attorney General of Canada.
>>> Please be assured that your email has been received and will be read
>>> with
>>> care.
>>> However, in light of the federal elections being held on October 21,
>>> there may be a delay in processing your email.
>>>
>>> ______________________________
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir écrit à l'honorable David Lametti, ministre de la
>>> Justice et procureur général du Canada.
>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu et que celui-ci sera
>>> lu avec soin.
>>> Cependant, compte tenu des élections fédérales du 21 octobre prochain,
>>> veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le
>>> traitement de votre courriel.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Oreiginal message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2019 13:02:10 -0300
>>> Subject: A little Deja Vu for Ralph Goodale and the RCMP before I file
>>> my next lawsuit as promised
>>> To: Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca,
>>> Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca,
>>> Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca, "clare.barry"
>>> clare.barry@justice.gc.ca, mcu@justice.gc.ca,
>>> alaina@alainalockhart.ca, info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca,
>>> oldmaison@yahoo.com, Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca, daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca,
>>> info@waynelong.ca, matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca,
>>> pat@patfinnigan.ca, David.Coon@gnb.ca, tj@tjharvey.ca,
>>> karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com, votejohnw@gmail.com,
>>> PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com
>>> postur@fjr.stjr.is, Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca,
>>> Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Mark.Blakely@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> David.Akin@globalnews.ca, dale.drummond@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, jfurey@nbpower.com,
>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, postur@irr.is, birgittajoy@gmail.com,
>>> birgitta@this.is>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, Kevin.Vickers@gnb.ca,
>>> blaine.higgs@gnb.ca, kris.austin@gnb.ca, greg.byrne@gnb.ca,
>>> carl.urquhart@gnb.ca, Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> Michel.Carrier@gnb.ca, Yves.Cote@elections.ca, Greg.Bonnar@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: motomaniac333@gmail.com, Newsroom@globeandmail.com,
>>> fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Telford, Katie"<Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 13:14:20 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: YO Mr Butts Here are some more comments
>>> published within CBC that the RCMP and their boss Ralph Goodale should
>>> review ASAP N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I am out of the office until Tuesday, October 22nd without access to
>>> this
>>> email.
>>> In my absence, you may contact Mike McNair
>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
>>> Elder Marques
>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
>>> Warm regards,
>>> Katie
>>> ______
>>> Bonjour,
>>> Je suis absente du bureau jusqu'au mardi 22 octobre sans accès à mes
>>> courriels.
>>> Durant mon absence, veuillez communiquer avec Mike McNair
>>> (michael.mcnair@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
>>> Elder Marques
>>> (elder.marques@pmo-cpm.gc.ca<
>>> Cordialement,
>>> Katie
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Butts, Gerald"<Gerald.Butts@pmo-cpm.gc.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:33:26 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your email. I am out of the office with limited access
>>> to email. For assistance, please email Laura D'Angelo at
>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca.
>>>
>>> Merci pour votre message. Je suis absent du bureau avec un accèss
>>> limité aux courriels. Si vous avez besoin d'assistance, veuillez
>>> communiquer avec Laura D'Angelo à l'adresse
>>> laura.d'angelo@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:30:48 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: So Much for the Strong Ethics of the Strong
>>> Organization commonnly knows as the RCMP/GRC N'esy Pas?
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>
>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>
>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>
>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>
>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Merci
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "Hon.Ralph.Goodale (PS/SP)"<Hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:15 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir ?crit ? l'honorable Ralph Goodale, ministre de la
>>> S?curit? publique et de la Protection civile.
>>> En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de la correspondance
>>> adress?e au ministre, veuillez prendre note qu'il pourrait y avoir un
>>> retard dans le traitement de votre courriel. Soyez assur? que votre
>>> message sera examin? avec attention.
>>> Merci!
>>> L'Unit? de la correspondance minist?rielle
>>> S?curit? publique Canada
>>> *********
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Ralph Goodale, Minister of
>>> Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence
>>> addressed to the Minister, please note there could be a delay in
>>> processing your email. Rest assured that your message will be
>>> carefully reviewed.
>>> Thank you!
>>> Ministerial Correspondence Unit
>>> Public Safety Canada
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Honourable Jody Wilson-Raybould, Member
>>> of Parliament for Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> This message is to acknowledge that we are in receipt of your email.
>>> Due to the significant increase in the volume of correspondence, there
>>> may be a delay in processing your email. Rest assured that your
>>> message will be carefully reviewed.
>>>
>>> To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
>>> the body of your email your full name, address, and postal code.
>>>
>>> Please note that your message will be forwarded to the Department of
>>> Justice if it concerns topics pertaining to the member's role as the
>>> Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada. For all future
>>> correspondence addressed to the Minister of Justice, please write
>>> directly to the Department of Justice at
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca<mailto:mcu@
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>> Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
>>> Vancouver Granville.
>>>
>>> Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
>>> courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
>>> correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
>>> votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.
>>>
>>> Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
>>> veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
>>> votre adresse et votre code postal.
>>>
>>> Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
>>> la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
>>> d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
>>> Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
>>> Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.
>>>
>>> Merci
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"
>>> <fin.minfinance-financemin.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:17 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova
>>> Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
>>> correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
>>> comments.
>>>
>>> Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
>>> électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
>>> commentaires.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com>
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:53:16 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Re Emails to Department of Justice and
>>> Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>>
>>> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail.
>>>
>>> If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical
>>> support, please contact our Customer Service department at
>>> 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail.
>>>
>>> If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to
>>> publiceditor@globeandmail.com<
>>>
>>> Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com
>>>
>>> This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and
>>> press releases.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.
>>> Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 12:53:03 -0400
>>> Subject: Re Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: wrscott@nbpower.com, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
>>> "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"
>>> <David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin <krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
>>> "rick.doucet"<rick.doucet@gnb.ca>, "Sollows, David (ERD/DER)"
>>> <david.sollows@gnb.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>,
>>> "robert.gauvin"<robert.gauvin@gnb.ca>, kevin.a.arseneau@gnb.ca,
>>> "Bill.Fraser"<Bill.Fraser@gnb.ca>, "John.Ames"<John.Ames@gnb.ca>,
>>> gerry.lowe@gnb.ca, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>,
>>> michelle.conroy@gnb.ca, "art.odonnell"<art.odonnell@nb.aibn.com>,
>>> "jake.stewart"<jake.stewart@gnb.ca>, mike.holland@gnb.ca, votejohnw
>>> <votejohnw@gmail.com>, andrea.anderson-mason@gnb.ca,
>>> greg.thompson2@gnb.ca, jean-claude.d'amours@gnb.ca,
>>> jacques.j.leblanc@gnb.ca, megan.mitton@gnb.ca, keith.chiasson@gnb.ca,
>>> "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, robert.mckee@gnb.ca,
>>> rick.desaulniers@gnb.ca, premier <premier@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"
>>> <Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, gphlaw@nb.aibn.com, wharrison
>>> <wharrison@nbpower.com>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
>>> "Jody.Wilson-Raybould"<Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc.
>>> "clare.barry"<clare.barry@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>,
>>> "hon.ralph.goodale"<hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>,
>>> "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc"<Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca
>>> <Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>,
>>> JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca, LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>> Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca, Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca, Newsroom
>>> <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, news <news@kingscorecord.com>, news
>>> <news@dailygleaner.com>
>>> Cc: "David.Raymond.Amos"<David.Raymond.Amos@gmail.com>
>>> <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca,
>>> Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: "McGrath, Stephen T"<Stephen.McGrath@novascotia.ca
>>> Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 12:40:22 +0000
>>> Subject: Automatic reply: Does anyone recall the email entitled "So
>>> Stephen McGrath if not you then just exactly who sent me this latest
>>> email from your office?"
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks for your message, however I am no longer at the Department of
>>> Justice, and this email account is not being monitored.
>>>
>>> Please contact Kim Fleming at Kim.Fleming@novascotia.ca (phone
>>> 902-424-4023), or Vicky Zinck at Victoria.Zinck@novascotia.ca (phone
>>> 902-424-4390). Kim and Vicky will be able to redirect you.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000
>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova Scotia
>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Mr. Amos,
>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy Minister of
>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the
>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the Province
>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal claim
>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the Attorney
>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we will
>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter.
>>>
>>> Department of Justice
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:16:38 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Laura Lee Langley, Karen Hudson and Joanne Munro I just
>>> called all three of your offices to inform you of my next lawsuit
>>> against Nova Scotia
>>> To: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>> Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>> Cc: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Laura Lee Langley
>>> 1700 Granville Street, 5th Floor
>>> One Government Place
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 1X5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-8940
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0667
>>> Email: LauraLee.Langley@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Karen Hudson Q.C.
>>> 1690 Hollis Street, 7th Floor
>>> Joseph Howe Building
>>> Halifax, NS B3J 3J9
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4223
>>> Fax: (902) 424-0510
>>> Email: Karen.Hudson@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Joanne Munro:
>>> 1505 Barrington Street, 14-South
>>> Maritime Centre
>>> Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3K5
>>> Phone: (902) 424-4089
>>> Fax: (902) 424-5510
>>> Email: Joanne.Munro@novascotia.ca
>>>
>>> If you don't wish to speak to me before I begin litigation then I
>>> suspect the Integrity Commissioner New Brunswick or the Federal Crown
>>> Counsel can explain the email below and the documents hereto attached
>>> to you and your Premier etc.
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> To: coi@gnb.ca
>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> Good Day Sir
>>>
>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>>>
>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>>>
>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
>>> suggested that you study closely.
>>>
>>> This is the docket in Federal Court
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> January 11th, 2016 https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> April 3rd, 2017
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>>
>>> The only hearing thus far
>>>
>>> May 24th, 2017
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>>
>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>>>
>>> Date: 20151223
>>>
>>> Docket: T-1557-15
>>>
>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>>>
>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>>>
>>> BETWEEN:
>>>
>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>>>
>>> Plaintiff
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>>>
>>> Defendant
>>>
>>> ORDER
>>>
>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
>>> December 14, 2015)
>>>
>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
>>> in its entirety.
>>>
>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter
>>> he stated:
>>>
>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
>>> You are your brother’s keeper.
>>>
>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
>>> Police.
>>>
>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>>>
>>>
>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There
>>> is no order as to costs.
>>>
>>> “B. Richard Bell”
>>> Judge
>>>
>>>
>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>>>
>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court
>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the
>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my
>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>>>
>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau?
>>>
>>>
>>> Vertias Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>>>
>>> Subject:
>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>>
>>> January 30, 2007
>>>
>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>>>
>>> Mr. David Amos
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos:
>>>
>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>>>
>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
>>> Minister of Health
>>>
>>> CM/cb
>>>
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>>>
>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.
>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Amos,
>>>
>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>>>
>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>>>
>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>>>
>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>>>
>>> Sincerely,
>>>
>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP
>>> Traffic Services NCO
>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222
>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622
>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>>
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>>
>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>>> Senator Arlen Specter
>>> United States Senate
>>> Committee on the Judiciary
>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>>> Washington, DC 20510
>>>
>>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>>
>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>>> raised in the attached letter. Mr. Amos has represented to me that
>>> these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. I believe Mr. Amos has been in
>>> contact
>>> with you about this previously.
>>>
>>> Very truly yours,
>>> Barry A. Bachrach
>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
>>> tel.: 506-457-7890
>>> fax: 506-444-5224
>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>>>
>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.
>>> Integrity Commissioner
>>>
>>> Hon. Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., who resides in Bathurst, N.B., is a
>>> native of Kedgwick, N.B., and is married to Huguette (Savoie)
>>> Deschênes. They have two sons.
>>>
>>> He studied at Saint-Joseph University (now Université de Moncton) from
>>> 1960 to 1962, University of Ottawa from 1962-1965 (B.A.), and
>>> University of New Brunswick (LL.B., 1968). He was admitted to the Law
>>> Society of New Brunswick in 1968. He was legal counsel to the
>>> Department of Justice in Fredericton from 1968 to 1971. He was in
>>> private practice from 1972 to 1982 and specialized in civil litigation
>>> as a partner in the law firm of Michaud, Leblanc, Robichaud, and
>>> Deschênes. While residing in Shediac, N.B., he served on town council
>>> and became the first president of the South East Economic Commission.
>>> He is a past president of the Richelieu Club in Shediac.
>>>
>>> In 1982, he was appointed a judge of the Court of Queen’s Bench of New
>>> Brunswick and of the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick in 2000.
>>>
>>> On July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the Court Martial Appeal Court of
>>> Canada.
>>>
>>> While on the Court of Appeal of New Brunswick, he was appointed
>>> President of the provincial Judicial Council and in 2012 Chairperson
>>> of the Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for the Province of New
>>> Brunswick for the 2015 federal election.
>>>
>>> He was appointed Conflict of Interest Commissioner in December 2016
>>> and became New Brunswick’s first Integrity Commissioner on December
>>> 16, 2016 with responsibilities for conflict of interest issues related
>>> to Members of the Legislative Assembly. As of April 1, 2017 he
>>> supervises lobbyists of public office holders under the Lobbyists’
>>> Registration Act.
>>>
>>> As of September 1, 2017, he will be assuming the functions presently
>>> held by the Access to Information and Privacy Commissioner.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:05:47 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: Hey Premier Gallant please inform the questionable
>>> parliamentarian Birigtta Jonsdottir that although NB is a small "Have
>>> Not" province at least we have twice the population of Iceland and
>>> that not all of us are as dumb as she and her Prime Minister pretends
>>> to be..
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:39:17 +0000
>>> Subject: RE: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick.
>>> Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed,
>>> and a response will be forthcoming.
>>> Once again, thank you for taking the time to write.
>>>
>>> Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick.
>>> Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné
>>> et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée.
>>> Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire.
>>>
>>> Sincerely, / Sincèrement,
>>> Mallory Fowler
>>> Corespondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance
>>> Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: Póstur IRR <postur@irr.is>
>>> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:43:50 +0000
>>> Subject: Re: After crossing paths with them bigtime in 2004 Davey Baby
>>> Coon and his many Green Meanie and Fake Left cohorts know why I won't
>>> hold my breath waiting for them to act with any semblance of integrity
>>> now N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc??
>>> To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið. / Your request has been received.
>>>
>>> Kveðja / Best regards
>>> Innanríkisráðuneytið / Ministry of the Interior
>>>
>>>
>>> For the public record I knew Birgitta was no better than the people
>>> she bitches about when she refused to discuss the QSLS blog with me
>>> while she was in Canada making her rounds in the Canadain media in
>>> January of 2011.
>>>
>>>
>>> This is the docket
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> These are digital recordings of the last two hearings
>>>
>>> Dec 14th https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Jan 11th https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> This me running for a seat in Parliament again while CBC denies it again
>>>
>>> Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
>>> Campaign, Rogers TV
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 09:20:29 -0400
>>> Subject: Hey before you Red Coats swear an Oath to the Queen and the
>>> 42nd Parliament begins perhaps the turncoat Big Bad Billy Casey the
>>> Yankee carpetbagger David Lutz or some Boyz from NB should explain
>>> this lawsuit to you real slow.
>>> To: alaina@alainalockhart.ca, david <david@lutz.nb.ca>,
>>> "daniel.mchardie"<daniel.mchardie@cbc.ca>, info@waynelong.ca,
>>> info@ginettepetitpastaylor.ca, rarseno@nbnet.nb.ca,
>>> matt@mattdecourcey.ca, info@sergecormier.ca, pat@patfinnigan.ca,
>>> tj@tjharvey.ca, karen.ludwig.nb@gmail.com
>>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> <Frank.McKenna@td.com>, info@votezsteve.ca, info@billcasey.ca,
>>> "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
>>> "dominic.leblanc.a1"<dominic.leblanc.a1@parl.gc.ca
>>> <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, jacques_poitras <jacques_poitras@cbc.ca>,
>>> "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "peter.mackay"
>>> <peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the
>>> most
>>>
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> 83 The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>>
>>> January 13, 2015
>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>>
>>> December 8, 2014
>>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>>
>>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>>
>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>>
>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>>> campaign of 2006.
>>>
>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>>
>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>>
>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>>
>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>>
>>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>>> are not.
>>>
>>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>>
>>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>>
>>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>>
>>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>>
>>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>>
>>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>>> alive
>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>>
>>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Original message ----------
>>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.
>>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com
>>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.
>>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>>
>>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact that your
>>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>>> interesting though
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>>> shy political animal
>>>
>>> Veritas Vincit
>>> David Raymond Amos
>>> 902 800 0369
>>>
>>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>>> including a Canadian general.
>>>
>>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>>> into the US policy.
>>>
>>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>>> were deployed WMD.
>>>
>>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>>
>>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>>> are to met before US troop can redeploy? Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>>
>>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>>
>>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>>
>>> https://na01.safelinks.
>>>
>>
>
.