Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Province imposes greater financial burden on N.B. Power than carbon costs do, evidence shows

$
0
0
 
 
 

Province imposes greater financial burden on N.B. Power than carbon costs do, evidence shows

Taxes, debt fees and mill subsidies imposed on utility by province adding millions to electricity bills

The New Brunswick government is blaming federal carbon pricing for deepening the financial troubles at N.B. Power but the utility itself has recently debunked that claim.  

The utility has also supplied evidence to the New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board showing that fees and charges imposed on it by the provincial government are by far a heavier financial burden.

"They pay a significant amount of revenue to the province," said New Brunswick public intervener Alain Chaisson.  

Chiasson has been probing the issue of N.B. Power costs in pre-hearing questions he has been submitting in advance of an upcoming rate hearing.

Electricity prices for the utility's residential customers are set to jump 13.8 per cent on April 1, pending a full hearing by the Energy and Utilities Board in May.   

The April 1 jump includes a 9.8 per cent increase in rates, a three per cent surcharge to recover previous over-expenditures and the expiry of a one per cent rebate on bills that has been in place for the last 12 months.

A man wearing a suit standing in front of a brown building Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland told the legislature Wednesday that sharply rising rates at N.B. Power are being fueled by 'hundreds of millions of dollars' in federal carbon charges. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Those three increases have triggered political controversy over who is to blame and what, if anything, should be done.  

On Wednesday in question period, Natural Resources and Energy Development Minister Mike Holland made his case that federal carbon charges are largely responsible.

"Let's muse a little bit about what provincial power bills would look like if N.B. Power weren't hit with a crushing $110-million worth of extra fuel costs directly connected to the carbon tax that the federal government supplied," said Holland. 

"When we see carbon taxes put hundreds of millions of dollars worth of extra costs on our public utility, we know that New Brunswickers are going to suffer."

It is not clear what figures Holland was quoting from in making those comments and on Thursday his department did not respond to a question asking for clarification about why numbers he used about carbon charges facing N.B. Power differ significantly from those published by the utility.

This year N.B. Power estimates it will pay $16.8 million in carbon charges mandated by the federal government.

A nuclear plant in the distance with water and waves in the foreground N.B. Power's Point Lepreau nuclear generating station pays the highest provincial property tax in New Brunswick at $5.2 million. It's more than double the provincial property tax on any private sector industrial property in New Brunswick, including the Irving Oil refinery. (Submitted by N.B. Power)

Every one per cent increase in N.B. Power rates is worth about $18 million.

However, in an appearance in front of the legislature's Crown corporations committee last month, Brad Coady, N.B. Power's vice-president of business development, told MLAs carbon charges are not a significant issue for the utility because everything collected is rebated to N.B. Power to finance its energy efficiency projects.   

He said eliminating carbon charges would likely produce no savings because that would also eliminate the rebates.

"There's a recycling of that money that's happening," said Coady.  

"That money is, you know, going out one side and coming back in the other side of the door."

However, financial recycling is not the case with a number of much larger provincial charges N.B. Power is faced with from the New Brunswick government that have been emerging as a potential issue at its approaching rate hearing.

An aerial view of an industrial facility along a shoreline, featuring three large metal cylinders used for storage of liquefied natural gas. Repsol's LNG facility and Irving Oil's crude oil tank farm in east Saint John are both exempt from provincial property tax. On the other side of the harbour in west Saint John, N.B. Power's Coleson Cove generating station is not exempt and pays nearly $1.8 million to the province. (CBC )

In preparation for that review, Chiasson has been asking the utility to detail the value of what it pays to the New Brunswick government in property and utility taxes, debt fees and other charges, and said if there is any room to have them reduced he'll advocate for that to happen.

 "We want to know what the province charges to N.B. Power," said Chiasson.

"We want to know how much those amounts are."

The list supplied by the utility in response to Chiasson's questions show it is required to pay $35.2 million this year to the province for it to guarantee and manage N.B. Power's more than $5-billion debt burden.

That fee is in addition to debt interest and principal payments that N.B. Power makes to its lenders separately.   

N.B. Power is also required by the province to pay $24.2 million in provincial utility taxes on its transmission system.  

Also, unlike a number of New Brunswick industrial operations that are exempt from paying provincial property taxes for being "important to economic development," N.B. Power facilities are charged in full.

Three people N.B. Power vice-president Brad Coady, left, appeared at the legislature in February with president Lori Clark and chief financial officer Darren Murphy. He told MLAs carbon charges on N.B. Power are mostly neutral because everything charged is then rebated back to the utility. (New Brunswick Legislative Assembly)

The single largest provincial property tax bill issued by New Brunswick this year was $5.2 million to N.B. Power on the Point Lepreau nuclear generating station. That includes a $54,000 cost-of-assessment fee.  

N.B. Power was also billed $2.4 million in provincial property tax on the Belledune coal-fired generating station on top of municipal property taxes, $1.76 million on the Coleson Cove oil-fired generating station in Saint John and various smaller amounts on hydro dams and other generating stations.

Not included in the list to Chiasson are political mandates imposed on N.B. Power by the province, such as a requirement that it subsidize electricity prices for five pulp and paper mills.   

By regulation, N.B. Power is made to buy renewable energy produced by the mills and instantly resell it back to them at a loss. The utility estimates that scheme will cost it $12.6 million next year, a 46 per cent increase over the $8.6 million it is costing this year.

Chiasson acknowledges N.B. Power must pay all costs imposed on it by the New Brunswick government, but he says it is important those costs are public so N.B. Power customers can fully understand what their electricity rates are paying for.

"Part of our job is to raise the issue. That's why we are asking," said Chiasson.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Robert Jones

Reporter

Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
236 Comments 
 
 
 
David Amos
Have a look at the EUB and then tell me there is no conflict of interests
 
 
 
 
David Amos
Try questioning the New Brunswick public intervener
 
 
 
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise 
 
 
David Amos.
Reply to David Amos
Clearly I was grateful for all the volunteers who turned up in my neck of the woods

Residents of Belleisle area grateful to volunteers who battled out-of-control wildfire

Lessons learned, needed equipment identified after last week's fire

Mia Urquhart · CBC News · Posted: Jun 05, 2023 7:00 AM ADT

 
 
 
Lou Bell
Rather than work together and make everyones' jobs easier , pettiness dominates the equation . Having buildings and resources only 3 miles away from each other is one of the reasons ALL parties supported Municipal refrom . Duplication to the Nth degree . And not 2 buildings but 3. Many much larger communities get by with one Fire Department , one building . What a wonderful resouce , having so many volunteers , but it appears a few are putting themselves ahead of the " what's best for the community " thinking , and some came into the new changes with an " I'm not giving an inch to any change while I'm here " 
 
.  
David Amos
Reply to Lou Bell
Why have Higgy and Allian ignored this issue? 
 
 
 
  
Phil Nadeau
Wow talk about letting your community down because your department didn't get the same amount of money that the other department received. As far that I can see, the other department only received more due to the fact they have 2 buildings to operate with more manpower compare to the one in Rexton. Am I missing something?

 
David Amos
Reply to Phil Nadeau
Nope
 


Clive Gibbons
This looks like an old boys club move. Good on the town for not blinking. Given the closest fully staffed and equipped department is 5.3km away, let them pout. A Quick Look at their FB page shows that they, or whoever their scribe is, make some sort of melodramatic post every year or so.
 
 
Bob Smith 
Reply to Clive Gibbons
That's all great that the two stations are 5.3km away, most calls aren't at the fire station. What happens if that neighboring department has a call with most, or all, of their trucks committed and one comes in for Rexton's area? Now you wait even longer. You now have extra call volume placed on those volunteer firefighters. The municipality made a social post, of course saying everything is false, and pretty well immediately shut commenting off and deleted comments, so what are they trying to keep people from telling.  
 
 
Clive Gibbons
Reply to Bob Smith 
It's called mutual aid. In addition the station three miles away, there are three more surrounding stations that can come to help. I suspect that half of the Rexton members don't want to have anything to do with this, but given the type of management they're under, wouldn't say a word. Old boys club.  
 
 
Bob Smith 
Reply to Clive Gibbons
I'm well aware of what it's called. Again, that's all extra calls that surrounding areas have to pick up, people leaving work, family etc, instead of the two sides trying to come to an agreement. It seems the municipality doesn't want to work with them either, but then again they don't want to hear from the community members either, given how quickly they shut down commenting/deleted comments on their social media post, where of course they just denied everything.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Clive Gibbons
Amen  
 
 
 
 
Kyle Woodman
Why does Team Higgs lie so much to the public?
 
Toby Tolly
Reply to Kyle Woodman
id like to buy DL a cigar and tinfoil hat
 
 
Marcel Belanger
Reply to Kyle Woodman
That’s the normal lieservatives modus operandi.

Holland doesn’t care he’s leaving soon so Higgs seems to be using him more and more for these bogus pronouncements.

 
Eugene Peabody 
Reply to Kyle Woodman
It is in their DNA.  
 
 
Geordan Mann 
Reply to Kyle Woodman
You know this - because it works. People love inertia. 


David Amos
Reply to Kyle Woodman
Its just another one of those things that politicians do that folks blessed with common sense fail to appreciate
 
 
 
  
John Pokiok 
News started increase of 10% than they said 13% now this morning it's 14% so what will be by April 1st.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to John Pokiok
Another 10% is already on the slate for next year
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Trending Articles