Inquest into police shooting death of Sammy Yatim on Toronto streetcar to begin Friday
Distraught teen shot several times by then-Const. James Forcillo on empty streetcar in 2013
A coroner's inquest is set to begin on Friday in Toronto into the police shooting death of a distraught teen on an empty streetcar more than 10 years ago.
The inquest will look into the circumstances surrounding the death of Sammy Yatim, 18, on July 27, 2013. The presiding jury may make recommendations aimed at preventing further deaths.
Yatim was shot several times by James Forcillo, a Toronto police constable at the time, while holding a small knife and standing alone on the streetcar on Dundas Street West west of Bathurst Street. Cellphone footage of the shooting posted online set off a wave of public outrage and calls for police reform.
Yatim was pronounced dead in hospital.
Asha James, lawyer for Yatim's mother Sahar Bahati, said Bahati hopes the inquest will lead to changes in how police are trained in de-escalation. She would like to see police given new strategies for dealing with mental health calls.
"This inquest has been something that has been very important to Dr. Bahati because she really, really wants what happened to Sammy not happen to anyone else. And so, the coroner's motto of 'We speak for the dead to protect the living,' that is something that Dr. Bahati really believes in," she said.
On the 10th anniversary of her son's death, Yatim's mother Sahar Bahadi said she worried her calls for change in policing and justice for her son were no longer being heard. (Nathan Denette/The Canadian Press)
"When we think about these these types of incidents where the police say, 'We're concerned for the safety of ourselves and for our other police officers, and for members of the public,' usually the person that's in distress is last on the totem pole, right? And we want to kind of change the way we're looking at that."
The inquest was supposed to begin in November 2022, but was delayed after Bryan Badali, the lawyer for Forcillo, brought forward a motion asking the proceeding to consider the possibility of "suicide by cop," where a person behaves threateningly in order to trigger a lethal response from law enforcement.
The presiding coroner rejected that argument.
In a news release on Dec. 14, the coroner's office said the inquest is mandatory under provincial law. Dr. David Cameron will be the presiding officer and Peter Napier and Grace Alcaide Janicas will be inquest counsel.
The proceedings, which will be conducted by video conference, are expected to last 13 days and to hear from about 14 witnesses.
With files from Lane Harrison
Inquest into Sammy Yatim's death scheduled for January
Inquest will examine the circumstances surrounding Yatim’s death, set to last 13 days
A date has been set for a coroner's inquest into the death of Sammy Yatim, an 18-year-old who was shot and killed by a Toronto police officer on a city streetcar just over a decade ago.
In a news release issued Thursday, the coroner's office said the inquest, which is mandatory under provincial law, will begin on Jan. 12, 2024.
Dr. David Cameron will be the presiding officer and Peter Napier and Grace Alcaide Janicas will be inquest counsel.
Yatim was shot multiple times by Const. James Forcillo while standing alone holding a small knife on the streetcar on July 27, 2013. Cellphone footage of the shooting posted online set off a wave of public outrage and calls for police reform.
The inquest will examine the circumstances surrounding Yatim's death, and the presiding jury may make recommendations aimed at preventing further deaths.
The proceedings are expected to last 13 days, with 14 witnesses set to give testimony.
Why can't the Department of Justice and Public Safety find the PUBLIC records of the coroner's inquest that was held in Higgy's neighbourhood in July of 1982?
Coroner (JPS/JSP)<Coroner@gnb.ca> | Fri, May 26, 2023 at 8:34 AM |
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | |
Hi David, We are presently pre-occupied by the other 20+ inquests that we have coming up this year. I was in grade 2 in 1982 so I'm afraid I can't answer this question for you. Pat is retired now and exhausted all the possible avenues she could have to gain some insight on this. As I said, we are extremely busy trying to prevent future unnecessary deaths so that is where our energy is focused at this time. I am sorry we couldn’t be of more help. Regards, Andrea Andrea Mather Administrative Assistant / Adjointe Administrative Coroner Services / Services des coroners Department of Justice & Public Safety / Ministère de la Justice et Sécurité publique Phone: (506) 453-3604 Fax : (506) 453-7124 Coroner Services, 12 McGloin Street, Fredericton, E3A 5T8, New Brunswick http://www.gnb.ca/coroner |
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:12 AM | ||||||||||||||
To: "kris.austin"<kris.austin@gnb.ca>, "michael.comeau"<michael.comeau@gnb.ca>, judy.desalliers@gnb.ca, Heather.Brander@gnb.ca, coroner@gnb.ca, michael.johnston@gnb.ca, "george.oram"<george.oram@gnb.ca>, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, "rob.moore"<rob.moore@parl.gc.ca>, "John.Williamson"<John.Williamson@parl.gc.ca>, "Robert. Jones"<Robert.Jones@cbc.ca>, "Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon"<Bobbi-Jean.MacKinnon@cbc.ca> | |||||||||||||||
Cc: "Michael.Duheme"<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Marco.Mendicino"<Marco.Mendicino@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca> | |||||||||||||||
https://davidraymondamos3. Tuesday, 23 May 2023 Inquest announced into death of former diplomat in Fredericton ER waiting room ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 22:51:31 -0300 Subject: Hey Senator Larry W. Campbell how is your conscience doing tonight? To: Larry.Campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 16:57:26 -0300 Subject: Re: Inquest Pat check out the top paragraph of page 3 in my letter to the RCMP Boss To: "Dickinson, Pat (JPS/JSP)"<Pat.Dickinson@gnb.ca> On 7/8/21, Dickinson, Pat (JPS/JSP) <Pat.Dickinson@gnb.ca> wrote: > David, I just checked our annual report for 1982. All inquests held that > year were mentioned but not this one. > > To me, this does not make sense as the paper specifically states "Coroner's > Inquest". > > Pat > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dickinson, Pat (JPS/JSP) > Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 3:10 PM > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > Subject: RE: Hi > > David, I checked our Records that were sent to Provincial Archives. We have > a list of all inquest information that was sent there and Silliphant's name > was not on the list for 1982. I also checked the previous years and > following years and there was no mention of a Silliphant. > > Pat > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 2:19 PM > To: Dickinson, Pat (JPS/JSP) <Pat.Dickinson@gnb.ca> > Subject: Re: Hi > > ATTENTION! External email / courriel externe. > > On 7/8/21, Dickinson, Pat (JPS/JSP) <Pat.Dickinson@gnb.ca> wrote: >> HI >> >> >> [Pat Dickinson (Mrs.) Signature December 2020] >> >> > ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Campbell, Larry W"<Larry.Campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2021 00:54:43 +0000 Subject: Re: YO Clint Richardson Methinks your gal pal Deanna Spingola should tell you why I declined the offer to speak her show over 11 years ago Nesy Pas? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Go bother someone else. I don’t need your rantings. Sent from my iPhone ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Campbell, Larry W"<Larry.Campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 20:19:28 +0000 Subject: Re: YO Larry Campbell I just called to say Shame on You and your buddies in the RCMP To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Cc: "Larry.Tremblay"<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. andre <andre@jafaust.com>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com> Yo David Amos. Go bother someone else and seek help for your obvious problems. No reply necessary. Sent from my iPhone Senator Larry W. Campbell Province: British Columbia (British Columbia) Affiliation: Canadian Senators Group Telephone: 613-995-4050 Email: larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca vCard Staff: Ross, Pam Personal Website: http://larrycampbell.ca/ Biography Born and raised in Brantford, Ontario, Campbell became a steelworker in Hamilton in the 1960s. In his first career move, he joined the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and was transferred to Vancouver in 1969, later joining the RCMP drug squad in 1973. After more than a decade with the RCMP, Campbell transitioned into death investigation, establishing Vancouver’s first District Coroner’s Office in 1981 and becoming the Chief Coroner for British Columbia in 1996. In this capacity, he became the inspiration behind the popular CBC drama Da Vinci’s Inquest, as well as its spin-off, Da Vinci’s City Hall. In 2002 he was elected Mayor by the citizens of Vancouver under the banner of the Coalition of Progressive Electors (COPE). Mayor Campbell spearheaded the approval and establishment of North America’s first legal safe injection site and continued to champion the Four Pillars Drug strategy. In addition to drug and crime prevention, he was also instrumental in the successful Vancouver bid to host the 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games; and the redevelopment of the Woodlands site. In August 2005, Campbell was summoned to the Senate of Canada by Prime Minister Paul Martin. As a Senator, Campbell has continued his work on drug policy, mental health, and aboriginal issues. In 2009, Campbell co-authored a book titled A Thousand Dreams: Vancouver's Downtown Eastside and the Fight for its Future with Neil Boyd and Lori Culbert. He holds a Master’s Degree in Business Administration (MBA) from City University in Vancouver. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Campbell, Larry W"<Larry.Campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 14:17:49 +0000 Subject: Re: YO David Freiheit did I mention that I know Julian Assange??? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Take me off this list. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 19, 2019, at 4:08 AM, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > I put this video up in March of 2010 in my long gone YouTube channel > > https://www.youtube.com/watch? > > The Ides of March 2010 for Al Jazeera Iceland WikiLeaks Zionists vs Mean Old Me > 304 views > > David Amos > Published on Apr 1, 2013 > > > From: "David Amos" > To: "Julian Assange)" > Cc:"Dan Fitzgerald"danf@danf.netByrne.G@parl.gc.ca > Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 8:35 PM > > Subject: Re: Al Jazeera on Iceland's new plan Thanx Here is something > about Iceland and Banksters Al Jazeera would enjoy > > Checkout this old pdf file from 2005 at about page two or three > > http://www.scribd.com/doc/ > > Then read on and chuckle > > > > From: "Julian Assange)"editor@wikileaks.org > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:15 PM > Subject: Al Jazeera on Iceland's plan for a press safe haven > > FYI: Al-Jazeera's take on Iceland's proposed media safe haven > http://www.youtube.com/watch? > > More info http://immi.is/ > > Julian Assange > > Editor > > WikiLeaks > > http://wikileaks.org// > > > > From: postur@fjr.stjr.is > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:06:39 +0000 > Subject: Re: RE: Iceland and Bankers etc I must ask the obvious > question. Why have you people ignored me for three years? > To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > > Dear David Amos > > Unfortunately there has been a considerable delay in responding to > incoming letters due to heavy workload and many inquiries to our office. > > We appreciate the issue raised in your letter. We have set up a web site > www.iceland.org where we have gathered various practical information > regarding the economic crisis in Iceland. > > Greetings from the Ministry of Finance. > > > Tilvísun í mál: FJR08100024 > > > > From: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 13:57:55 -0300 > Subject: Re: Regarding your enquiry to the Prime Ministry of Iceland > To: postur@for.stjr.is > > > Thanx > > > On 10/8/08, postur@for.stjr.ispostur@for.stjr.is wrote: > > David Raymond Amos > > Your enquiry has been received by the Prime Ministry of Iceland and > waits attendance. > > Thank you. > > > From: Birgitta Jonsdottir birgittajoy@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 07:14:02 +0000 > Subject: Re: Bon Soir Birgitta according to my records this is the > first email I ever sent you > To: David Amos david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > dear Dave > > i have got your email and will read through the links as soon as i > find some time keep up the good fight in the meantime > > thank you for bearing with me > i am literary drowning in requests to look into all sorts of matters > and at the same time working 150% work at the parliament and > > the creation of a political movement and being a responsible parent:) > plus all the matters in relation to immi > > with oceans of joy > birgitta > > > http://qslspolitics.blogspot. > > > > From: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:34:40 -0300 > Subject: Fwd: USANYS-MADOFF AND IMPORTANT INFORMATION FROM US > ATTORNEY'S OFFICE SDNY > To: frank.pingue@thomsonreuters. > johanna.sigurdardottir@fel. > Milliken.P@parl.gc.ca, sjs@althingi.is, emb.ottawa@mfa.is, > rmellish@pattersonlaw.ca, irisbirgisdottir@yahoo.ca, > grant.mccool@thomsonreuters. > "Robert. Jones"Robert.Jones@cbc.ca, marie@mariemorneau.com, > dfranklin@franklinlegal.com, egilla@althingi.is, > william.turner@exsultate.ca, klm@althingi.is, mail@fjr.stjr.is, > Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca, wendy.williams@landsbanki.is, > cdhowe@cdhowe.org, desparois.sylviane@fcac.gc.ca, plee@stu.ca, > jonina.s.larusdottir@ivr.stjr. > fme@fme.is, info@landsbanki.is, sedlabanki@sedlabanki.is, tif@tif.is > Cc: rfowlo@comcast.net, jmullen@townofmilton.org, webo@xplornet.com, > t.j.burke@gnb.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, Dan Fitzgerald danf@danf.net, > "spinks08@hotmail.com"spinks08@hotmail.com, gypsy-blog > gypsy-blog@hotmail.com, "nb. premier"nb.premier@gmail.com, nbpolitico > nbpolitico@gmail.com, "bruce.fitch"bruce.fitch@gnb.ca, "bruce.alec" > bruce.alec@gmail.com > > I know that the Yankee law enforcement people are either as dumb as > posts or pure evil. There appears to be few exceptions. The ethical > Ms. Olson is my favourite klady today. Does anyone speaking or acting > in the best interests of the decent folks in Iceland understand my > sincerity and her Integrity YET? > > Veritas Vincit > > David Raymond Amos > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch? > > Julian Assange Arrested - What's Next? Viva Frei Vlawg > 4,915 views > Viva Frei > Published on Apr 12, 2019 > April 11, 2019 will be a day that many people remember as the day > Julian Assange was arrested by British authorities after spending 7 > years in asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London. The question is > how this happened, and what will happen next. Here is my vlawg > breakdown. Enjoy! And be sure to like, share, comment and subscribe! > Peace! > > > ---------- Original message ---------- From: Brenda Lucki <brenda.lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:20:25 -0400 Subject: Re: David Coon and his buddy Chucky Leblanc know Attorney General Serge Rousselle told the CBC political panel the topic should not be discussed.because I am about to put my matter before the Supreme Court (Transferred - Mutation à Ottawa) To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Bonjour - Hello I am currently in the midst of transferring to Ottawa, and will be checking my e-mails periodically. If you require assistance in regards to Depot, please contact Cpl. Roshan Pinto at 639-625-3577 or Nicole Yandon at 639-625-3066. If you require anything in regards to the Commissioner' office, please contact Angie Boucher at 613-8436183 or Brigitte Voitel 613-843-4590. Je suis actuellement en train de préparer ma mutation à Ottawa; je vérifierai mes courriels à l'occasion. Pour toute demande urgente concernant la Division Dépôt, veuillez communiquer avec le cap. Roshan Pinto au 639-625-3577 ou avec Nicole Yandon au 639-625-3066. Pour toute demande en lien au bureau du commissaire, veuillez communiquer avec Angie Boucher au 613-8436183 ou avec Brigitte Voitel au 613-843-4590. Brenda >>> David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> 04/13/18 15:20 >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ New harassment policy in works after allegations against Speaker Legislative administration committee is setting up sub-group to write policy, says David Coon CBC News · Posted: Apr 12, 2018 7:53 PM AT | The CBC Political Panel discussed the harassment allegations against Speaker Chris Collins. Details about the allegations have not been made public. (CBC News) Listen to the full CBC New Brunswick Political Panel podcast by downloading from the CBC Podcast page or subscribing to the podcast in iTunes. Members of the legislative administration committee want a more robust harassment policy specifically for the legislature, according to Green Party Leader David Coon. A sub-group of the committee is drafting a new policy, which "will go above and beyond the workplace harassment policy for general government," Coon, a member of the committee, said during the CBC New Brunswick Political Panel podcast this week. Speaker Collins to fight 'politically driven' harassment allegation Mystery swirls around who will run for Liberals in Moncton Centre The decision follows harassment allegations revealed last week by Premier Brian Gallant against Speaker Chris Collins. Gallant suspended the Moncton Centre MLA from caucus over a complaint he harassed a former employee of the legislative assembly. Collins, who was planning to run in the September provincial election, will fight the allegations, according to his lawyer, T.J. Burke. Political Panel: April 12 Edition 00:00 34:42 This weeks political panel with Terry Seguin discusses the allegations of harassment against Chris Collins. 34:42 Filling policy gaps The legislative administration committee has agreed the clerk of the legislature will select an independent investigator to examine the complaint. It has also begun work to clarify issues with the harassment policy with respect to the allegations against the Speaker. "The decision to do that reflects that there was a gap at the legislative assembly," Coon said. The Liberals were criticized by opposition panel members for their response to the complaint. Four of the five panellists said the government failed to follow the existing harassment policy in not taking action when it learned there might be a complaint. Green Party Leader David Coon says the legislative administration committee is going to draft a new harassment policy. (CBC News) Gallant learned of a possible complaint in February but has said his office couldn't act until the official complaint was filed April 5. But the Progressive Conservatives were quick to point to the policy that says senior officials must take action about harassment "whether or not a complaint is filed." PC member Ted Flemming said on the panel that he was pleased to see an independent investigation because he doesn't trust the executive branch to get to the bottom of it. There is a pattern of shrouding the truth, said the MLA, pointing to scandals such as Atcon and inflated property taxes. "We're not able to get thNDP Leader Jennifer McKenzie took exception to Flemming's comparisons, saying the process should be followed and communicated clearly to the public and shouldn't be politicized. McKenzie said the rights of both Collins and the complainant should be respected and due process given. Speaker Chris Collins says he'll fight the harassment allegations. (CBC) People's Alliance Leader Kris Austin said time is of a factor with the investigation since it's an election year and Collins was committed to running. Austin pitched a 60-day deadline for the investigation. Gallant has said Collins could not run as a Liberal candidate while suspended from caucus. Rousselle responds Attorney General Serge Rousselle told the panel the topic should not be discussed. He said the harassment policy is being followed and it would be "inappropriate" to comment on the matter during the investigation. Attorney General Serge Rousselle says the Collins case shouldn't be discussed while an investigation is underway. (CBC News) Rousselle also dismissed calls for a full inquiry. "It could jeopardize the confidentiality of this process and discourage other people from coming forward with their own complaints for the fear of publicity that would follow," he said. He said it's the government's understanding the complainant does not want a full inquiry either. ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 12:24:24 -0400 Subject: Re: Attn Sergeant-at-Arms Gilles Cote (506) 453-2527 I just called AGAIN To: Gilles.Cote@gnb.ca, "dan. bussieres"<dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "Michael.Duheme"<Michael.Duheme@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Armitage, Blair" <blair.armitage@sen.parl.gc.ca <premier@gov.pe.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "premier.ministre" <premier.ministre@cex.gouv.qc. premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier <premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.nl.ca>, premier <premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay" <Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca <martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> <Jonathan.Vance@forces.gc.ca>, "Tim.RICHARDSON" <Tim.RICHARDSON@gnb.ca>, info <info@gg.ca>, "serge.rousselle" <serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "denis.landry2"<denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> <hon.ralph.goodale@canada.ca>, "jan.jensen" <jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "Nathalie.Drouin" <Nathalie.Drouin@justice.gc.ca ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 09:59:24 -0400 Subject: Fwd: So what does Premier Gallant and Minister Doucet et al think of my lawsuit? How about David Coon and his blogging buddy Chucky joking about being illegally barred from parliamentary property To: Ernie.Steeves@gnb.ca, Sherry.Wilson@gnb.ca, Keirstead.Brian@gnb.ca, "Ross.Wetmore"<Ross.Wetmore@gnb.ca>, Gary.Crossman@gnb.ca, Glen.Savoie@gnb.ca, Trevor.Holder@gnb.ca, Dorothy.Shephard@gnb.ca, Ed.Doherty@gnb.ca, Bill.Oliver@gnb.ca, John.Ames@gnb.ca, "michael.bray"<michael.bray@ Jody.Carr@gnb.ca, Pam.Lynch@gnb.ca, Jeff.Carr@gnb.ca, Carl.Urquhart@gnb.ca, Stewart.Fairgrieve@gnb.ca, Andrew.Harvey@gnb.ca, Chuck.Chiasson@gnb.ca, Madeleine.Dube@gnb.ca, Francine.Landry@gnb.ca Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> <dan.bussieres@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, tj <tj@burkelaw.ca>, "chris.collins"<chris.collins@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon" <David.Coon@gnb.ca> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:05:07 +0000 Subject: RE: So what does Premier Gallant anthink of my lawsuit? How about David Coon and his blogging buddy Chucky joking about being illegally barred from parliamentary property To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured that your email has been received, will be reviewed, and a response will be forthcoming. Once again, thank you for taking the time to write. Merci d'avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré que votre courriel a bien été reçu, qu'il sera examiné et qu'une réponse vous sera acheminée. Merci encore d'avoir pris de temps de nous écrire. Sincerely, / Sincèrement, Mallory Fowler Correspondence Manager / Gestionnaire de la correspondance Office of the Premier / Cabinet du premier ministre On 1/19/18, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 >> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., >> To: coi@gnb.ca >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >> Good Day Sir >> >> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed >> to speak to one of your staff for the first time >> >> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who >> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt >> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker >> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. >> >> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I >> suggested that you study closely. >> >> This is the docket in Federal Court >> >> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >> >> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings >> >> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ >> >> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ >> >> April 3rd, 2017 >> >> https://archive.org/details/ >> >> >> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal >> >> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >> >> >> The only hearing thus far >> >> May 24th, 2017 >> >> https://archive.org/details/ >> >> >> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity >> >> Date: 20151223 >> >> Docket: T-1557-15 >> >> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 >> >> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell >> >> BETWEEN: >> >> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS >> >> Plaintiff >> >> and >> >> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN >> >> Defendant >> >> ORDER >> >> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on >> December 14, 2015) >> >> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to >> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November >> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim >> in its entirety. >> >> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a >> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then >> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian >> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, >> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter >> he stated: >> >> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the >> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. >> You are your brother’s keeper. >> >> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former >> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to >> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of >> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses >> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to >> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime >> Minister of Canada, The Right Hon>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; >> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former >> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff >> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court >> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired >> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted >> Police. >> >> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my >> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many >> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am >> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I >> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in >> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, >> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding >> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has >> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. >> >> >> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of >> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There >> is no order as to costs. >> >> “B. Richard Bell” >> Judge >> >> >> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment >> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent >> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. >> >> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court >> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the >> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my >> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? >> >> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the >> most >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca >> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM >> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in >> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to >> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you >> dudes are way past too late >> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à >> lalanthier@hotmail.com >> >> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à >> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca >> >> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at >> lalanthier@hotmail.com >> >> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to >> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca >> >> Thank you, >> >> Merci , >> >> >> http://davidraymondamos3. >> >> >> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war >> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to >> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over >> five years after he began his bragging: >> >> January 13, 2015 >> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate >> >> December 8, 2014 >> Why Canada Stood Tall! >> >> Friday, October 3, 2014 >> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And >> Stupid Justin Trudeau >> >> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide >> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. >> >> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien >> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign >> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to >> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were >> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were >> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth >> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for >> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. >> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not >> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a >> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to >> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was >> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But >> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s >> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s >> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, >> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle >> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway >> campaign of 2006. >> >> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then >> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the >> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, >> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. >> >> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling >> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of >> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners >> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a >> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. >> >> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have >> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. >> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by >> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is >> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of >> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government >> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this >> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a >> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. >> >> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror >> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” >> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, >> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The >> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and >> >> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of >> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have >> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical. >> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me. >> >> Subject: >> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 >> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca >> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> >> January 30, 2007 >> >> WITHOUT PREJUDICE >> >> Mr. David Amos >> >> Dear Mr. Amos: >> >> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, >> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. >> >> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have >> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve >> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Honourable Michael B. Murphy >> Minister of Health >> >> CM/cb >> >> >> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: >> >> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 >> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, >> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, >> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John. >> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has >> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not >> >> Dear Mr. Amos, >> >> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off >> over the holidays and>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. >> >> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position >> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process >> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the >> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these >> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this >> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. >> >> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false >> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear >> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada >> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment >> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. >> >> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on >> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Warren McBeath, Cpl. >> GRC Caledonia RCMP >> Traffic Services NCO >> Ph: (506) 387-2222 >> Fax: (506) 387-4622 >> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> >> >> >> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., >> Office of the Integrity Commissioner >> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street >> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 >> tel.: 506-457-7890 >> fax: 506-444-5224 >> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM >> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David >> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a >> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too >> late >> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca >> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal. mclaughlin.heather@ >> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, >> paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca, >> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc. >> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc. >> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca, >> Whistleblower@ctv.ca >> >> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc- >> >> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/ >> >> http://thedavidamosrant. >> >> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell >> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in >> Feferal Court? >> >> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but >> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT? >> >> Veritas Vincit >> David Raymond Amos >> 902 800 0369 >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400 >> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in >> the USDOJ for me will ya? >> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com, >> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, >> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca >> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, >> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com >> >> QSLS Politics >> By Location Visit Detail >> Visit 29,419 >> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government) >> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice) >> ISP US Dept of Justice >> Location Continent : North America >> Country : United States (Facts) >> State : District of Columbia >> City : Washington >> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map) >> Language English (U.S.) en-us >> Operating System Microsoft WinXP >> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 >> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; >> Javascript version 1.3 >> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 >> Color Depth : 32 bits >> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm >> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm >> Visit Length 0 seconds >> Page Views 1 >> Referring URL http://www.google.co... >> Search Engine google.com >> Search Words david amos bernie madoff >> Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy- >> Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy- >> Out Click >> Time Zone UTC-5:00 >> Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm >> Visit Number 29,419 >> >> http://qslspolitics.blogspot. >> >> >> Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its >> because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400 >> Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy >> To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >> In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry >> affect the interests of every person in every district of every >> country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with >> Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and >> some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record. >> >> All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of >> Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the >> Conservatives >> >> >> Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the >> link to Madoff and Putnam Investments >> >> Here is why >> >> http://banking.senate.gov/ >> >> Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate >> Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice >> Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the >> following file >> >> http://www.checktheevidence. >> >> http://occupywallst.org/users/ >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: "Hansen, David"David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca >> Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000 >> Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen >> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> >> Hello Mr. Amos, >> >> I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic >> region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil >> litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named >> defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an >> existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which >> Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please >> provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action >> and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other >> matters. >> >> Thanks >> >> David A. Hansen >> Regional Director | Directeur régional >> General Counsel |Avocat général >> Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et >> services de consultation >> Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice >> Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke >> 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke >> Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse >> B3J 1P3 >> david.hansen@justice.gc.ca >> Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902) >> 426-2329 >> This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client >> privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If >> you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete >> this entire e-mail. >> Before printing think about the Environment >> Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. >> Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire. >> >> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ----->>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300 >>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to >>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET? >>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, >>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, >>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net >>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is, >>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com >>> >>> FBI Boston >>> One Center Plaza >>> Suite 600 >>> Boston, MA 02108 >>> Phone: (617) 742-5533 >>> Fax: (617) 223-6327 >>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov >>> >>> Hours >>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal >>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday >>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any >>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our >>> office at (617) 742-5533. >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300 >>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is >>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap >>> tapes Sell them on Ebay? >>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, >>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com, >>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >>> >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com >>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, >>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com >>> >>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/ >>> >>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ >>> >>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask >>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING???? >>> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >>> >>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the >>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball >>> cards? >>> >>> http://www.archive.org/ >>> >>> http://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/ >>> >>> http://www.archive.org/ >>> >>> http://archive.org/details/ >>> >>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >>> Senator Arlen Specter >>> United States Senate >>> Committee on the Judiciary >>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >>> Washington, DC 20510 >>> >>> Dear Mr. Specter: >>> >>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >>> raised in the attached letter. >>> >>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap >>> tapes. >>> >>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously. >>> >>> Very truly yours, >>> Barry A. Bachrach >>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >>> To: "Rob Talach"rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com >>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM >>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing >>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why >>> >>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean >>> a lot to you >>> >>> http://www.checktheevidence. >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400 >>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW >>>>>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca, >>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca, >>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, >>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, >>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca, >>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >>> >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk, >>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca >>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, >>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc. >>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, >>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca, >>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >>> >>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/ >>> >>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/ >>> >>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500 >>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy >>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH >>> Constable Peddle??? >>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >>> >>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails. >>> >>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC >>> Director General >>> HR Transformation >>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502 >>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2 >>> >>> Tel 613-843-6039 >>> Cel 613-818-6947 >>> >>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC >>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines >>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502 >>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2 >>> >>> tél 613-843-6039 >>> cel 613-818-6947 >>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >>> >
|
Asha James
Asha James is a partner at Falconers LLP and a graduate of the University of Windsor Law School where she earned American (JD) and Canadian (LLB) law degrees. She completed her articles with Falconers LLP and was called to the bar of Ontario in June of 2009.
Asha’s practice has centered around public interest litigation, with a strong focus on human rights, constitutional law, and access to justice. Asha also has a growing employment law practice providing advice on human resource matters for Indigenous police services and family service agencies.
Asha has acted on a number of high profile hearings, including Miller v. Toronto Police Services Board et al, Smith v. The Attorney General of Canada et al, Manon v. The Toronto Police Services Board et al., and Yatim v. The Toronto Police Services Board et al.
Asha has appeared before the Supreme Court of Canada, the Ontario Court of Appeal, and the Federal Court of Appeal, as well as at various administrative tribunals including the Canadian and Ontario Human Rights Tribunals, the Ontario Labour Relations Board and the Ontario Environmental Review Tribunal.
Asha is also a sessional instructor at the University of Windsor Law School and Lakehead University Law School, where she teaches Torts and Advanced Torts courses. Asha has participated in a number of panels as a guest speaker on topics ranging from police accountability, Ontario’s Inquest system, and environmental law.
Julian N. Falconer
Founding Partner
Julian Falconer holds degrees from the University of Alberta, McGill University, and the University of Toronto in addition to an Honorary Doctorate of Laws from the University of Guelph-Humber. He is a Bencher of the Law Society of Ontario and an author, writing extensively on issues of race and civil liberties, and co-authoring the book, the “Annotated Coroners Act”. In the true tradition of a Barrister, Julian Falconer’s practice takes him to civil, administrative, and criminal courts at both trial and appellate levels, including the Supreme Court. He is bilingual and has argued cases in both English and French.
More recently, with the firm’s expansion from Southern Ontario into the North, his work has expanded to focus on Indigenous-side representation on matters including child welfare, education, equitable service provision, and community governance, always focusing on the unique remedies required for reconciliation. Specifically, this work has included representation of the two largest First Nations police forces in negotiation of legislated standards of policing, representation on the Inquest into the deaths of Seven Youth in Thunder Bay, and as Counsel for the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada over a five-year period in respect of document collection litigation.
Julian’s client base spans the range of individuals and institutions which have recently included Nishnawbe Aski Nation (First Nations political territorial organization for Northern Ontario), Aboriginal Legal Services of Toronto, and several First Nations Police Services, as outlined above.
Julian has been counsel on matters related to prisoner rights, police accountability, and human rights. Specifically, this work has included the representation of Maher Arar, who made Canadian legal history in receiving the largest human rights settlement allotted to an individual plaintiff; the family of Ashley Smith, the 19-year-old who died in custody at Grand Valley Federal Penitentiary; and Adam Nobody and the “Free Press Four” in relation to their unlawful beatings and arrests during the G20 summit in Toronto.
Julian has represented numerous organizational interests (First Nations and African Canadian) at the Commission of Inquiry level, including the Ipperwash Inquiry and the Goudge Inquiry into child pathologist, Dr. Charles Smith.
Julian is also a pilot with over 2800 hours in the air. With the addition of “Falconair”, the firm not only represents individual First Nations in the remote North, but also provides a new level of access to justice by flying to them, visiting and engaging in the communities, and building new relationships.
What people are saying about Julian Falconer:
“I have known Julian for about 20
years. I have always known him to be supportive of all communities and
of issues dealing with equity and fairness. He is committed and is also a
fearless champion for the voiceless.”
-Sandy Thomas, Former President of CABL; Counsel, Public Prosecution Service of Canada
“As a Past President of the Indigenous
Bar Association and a legal practitioner for the last seventeen years, I
have experienced firsthand Julian’s style of advocacy in respect of
Indigenous justice issues. Julian has been at the forefront on key
Aboriginal justice issues both provincially and nationally including the
Iacobucci Inquiry into Justice Issues in the North and the Truth and
Reconciliation Commission litigation regarding residential school
survivors.”
-Dianne Corbiere, Managing Partner, Nahwegahbow, Corbiere; LSUC Bencher; Past President of the Indigenous Bar Association
“Mr. Falconer is one of the country’s
top constitutional and human rights lawyers. He represented the Smith
family in a lawsuit into the death of Ashley Smith in custody. He worked
on the Ipperwash Inquiry. He represented Maher Arar in a suit against
the federal government over his rendition and torture in Syria. The list
goes on. Point is, Mr. Falconer takes a special interest in holding
government to account.”
-Financial Post, November 17, 2014
“Colleagues and clients describe
Falconer as a steadfast champion of the public interest, a voice for the
powerless, a changemaker.”
-Toronto Star, December 19, 2013
Attn Anthony Morgan I just called from 902 800 0369 and left a voicemail
David Amos<motomaniac333@gmail.com> | Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:13 PM |
To: anthonym@falconers.ca | |
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> | |
http://www.cbc.ca/radio/ In an essay for Out In The Open, human rights and civil liberties lawyer Anthony Morgan reflects on how Eric Garner's last words "I can't breathe" changed his work and his advocacy as a Black man living in Canada. Here is an excerpt from his essay: From where I sat, Eric Garner's death looked like a lynching. He stood midday on a busy street sidewalk full of cars and occasional passers-by; the officers acted as a mob; and, Garner was soon going to be made into an example for daring to demand that the police respect his humanity. "I can't breathe""I can't breathe""I can't breathe""I can't breathe""I can't breathe""I can't breathe""I can't breathe""I can't breathe""I can't breathe""I can't breathe" Then nothing. Garner is left unconscious on the concrete. The video ends with several officers surrounding Garner, hovering over his limp lifeless body on the Staten sidewalk. For how long, I don't know, but I just sat there in the dark with Garner's last moments looping my mind, his last words echoing through my consciousness: "I can't breathe" These words touched a chord in me that rings back through several centuries, starting with the enslavement of Black people. Garner channelled our centuries-old cry to be left alone to enjoy our human right to freedom. Anthony Morgan Anthony Morgan (Courtesy of Anthony Morgan) It was a sentiment I too have felt as a Black man under the police's constant eye of suspicion for living while Black. Garner's feeling of being fed up with police interfering with his life was familiar to me. At different moments, I too have felt the exhausting burden of my Black skin being marked as a threat, as inherently criminal. I too have felt that deep desire to just be left alone, the frustration of being accused of something I haven't done, and feeling helpless as my accusers have already judged me guilty until proven innocent. Like Garner, I happen to be a large, heavy-set Black man. I have felt the size and Blackness of my body be met with fear and seen as a sign of trouble. I know too much about just trying to be, while my body was being seen as a weapon and a danger needing to be monitored, controlled, contained, and if not compliant, slain. From my own experience I know that being big and Black makes it hard to breathe in Canada too. To some that sounds like an exaggeration. Some might respond: "Toronto is not New York and Canada is not like America when it comes to these things." True, but acknowledging the difference doesn't dismiss the fact that anti-Blackness is borderless. At the time of Eric Garner's death, America already had its #TrayvonMartin #MichaelBrown and #TamirRice. But Canada had its own hashtag memorials at that time too: Jermaine Carby, Ian Pryce, Frank Anthony Berry, Michael Eligon, Eric Osawe, Reyal Jardine-Douglas, Junior Alexander Mannon. I didn't know then that names like Andrew Loku, Kwasi Skene-Peters, Bony Jean-Pierre, Alex Wetlaufer, Abdirahman Abdi and Pierre Coriolan would soon be added to the list of Black men in Canada. So, watching Garner's lynching, I felt the pain and horror of his last words in a visceral way, not as a foreign phenomenon. It was an experience regretfully resonant with Black life in Canada. Too routinely, Black bodies are unjustly surveilled, intercepted and snuffed out by police in the Great White North. Not only is anti-Black racism real here, but it is forcefully denied when you try to point it out. As such, there exists a double burden of anti-Blackness in Canada. This is what I call the suffocating experience of being Black in Canada. This story appears in the Out in the Open episode "Last Words". https://twitter.com/ Anthony Morgan Verified account @AnthonyNMorgan 22h22 hours ago Herein, I read an essay I wrote for @cbcopen describing the flurry of thoughts, feelings and overall response I had to watching the video of #EricGarner's killing at the hands of NYC Police. http://www.cbc.ca/player/play/ #BlackHistoryMonth #BlackLivesCDNSyllabus http://www.falconers.ca/team/ Anthony Morgan Phone Number 416-964-0495 ext. 226 Email Address anthonym@falconers.ca ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Brown, Patrick"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47:56 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369 To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855. Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible. Regards, Patrick Brown, MPP Simcoe North Leader of the Official Opposition ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:22:57 -0400 Subject: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369 To: dbutt@barristersatlaw.ca, matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca, "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada. < ht.lacroix@cbc.ca> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> < David.Akin@globalnews.ca>, "patrick.brown"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org> Interesting news to say the least EH David Akin? http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ 'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual misconduct accuser changes timeline One of Brown's accusers now says she was wasn't underage at time of alleged sexual misconduct Amara McLaughlin · CBC News · Posted: Feb 14, 2018 2:45 PM ET | "CTV 'stands by its reporting': spokesperson Matthew Garrow, spokesperson for Bell Media, also responded to Brown's Facebook post on Wednesday in an email to CBC News. "CTV News continues to stand by its reporting," Garrow said. "Patrick Brown's allegations regarding our reporting are false. As we reported once again last night, the two women have reiterated their allegations of sexual misconduct by Patrick Brown." Matthew Garrow, Bell Media, 416-384-5258 or matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca; Mr Butt here is where I published the email I sent you last year http://davidraymondamos3. There rest of this email should bring you up to date >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300 >> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to >> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET? >> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, >> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, >> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is, >> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com >> >> FBI Boston >> One Center Plaza >> Suite 600 >> Boston, MA 02108 >> Phone: (617) 742-5533 >> Fax: (617) 223-6327 >> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov >> >> Hours >> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal >> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday >> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any >> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our >> office at (617) 742-5533. >> >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300 >> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is >> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap >> tapes Sell them on Ebay? >> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, >> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com, >> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com, mvalencia@globe.com >> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, >> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com >> >> http://www.bostonglobe.com/ >> >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ >> >> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask >> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING???? >> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >> >> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the >> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball >> cards? >> >> http://www.archive.org/ >> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> >> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/ >> >> http://www.archive.org/ >> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> >> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >> Senator Arlen Specter >> United States Senate >> Committee on the Judiciary >> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >> Washington, DC 20510 >> >> Dear Mr. Specter: >> >> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man >> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters >> raised in the attached letter. >> >> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes. >> >> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously. >> >> Very truly yours, >> Barry A. Bachrach >> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> To: "Rob Talach"rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com >> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM >> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing >> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why >> >> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean >> a lot to you >> >> http://www.checktheevidence. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400 >> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW >> Bernadine Chapman?? >> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca, >> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca, >> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca, >> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca, >> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, >> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca, >> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Cleme >> david@fairwhistleblower.ca >> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, >> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc. >> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com, >> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca, >> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca> >> >> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/ >> >> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/ >> >> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500 >> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy >> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH >> Constable Peddle??? >> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> >> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails. >> >> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC >> Director General >> HR Transformation >> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502 >> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2 >> >> Tel 613-843-6039 >> Cel 613-818-6947 >> >> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC >> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines >> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502 >> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2 >> >> tél 613-843-6039 >> cel 613-818-6947 >> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:42 -0400 Subject: Yo Norman.Sabourin Need I say that the noname assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: "Norman.Sabourin"<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2"<denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" < hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> michael.bray@fosterandcompany. < Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay" < Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ New Brunswick chief justice announces retirement J. Ernest Drapeau was appointed to the office in 2003 CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 5:32 PM AT http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ Sitting judge calls on chief justice to resign for defying transfer law Chief Justice David Smith transferred a judge in December in a challenge of new Judicature Act changes By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2018 4:00 AM AT The Hon. George S. Rideout Justice: Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Moncton Judges Chambers 145 Assumption Blvd., PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1 Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3 Phone: 506-856-2301 Bell, Drapeau and Smith should have done the right thing LONG AGO https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/ New Brunswick The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision? Please enjoy http://davidraymondamos3. Sunday, 19 November 2017 Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before The Supreme Court https://decisions.fct-cf.gc. Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Amos v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2017-10-30 Neutral citation 2017 FCA 213 File numbers A-48-16 Date: 20171030 Docket: A-48-16 Citation: 2017 FCA 213 CORAM: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Respondent on the cross-appeal (and formally Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant on the cross-appeal (and formerly Respondent) Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017. Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: THE COURT Date: 20171030 Docket: A-48-16 Citation: 2017 FCA 213 CORAM: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. BETWEEN: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS Respondent on the cross-appeal (and formally Appellant) and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Appellant on the cross-appeal (and formerly Respondent) REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT I. Introduction [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos) filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan (Claim at para. 96). [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious, and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the Prothontary’s Order). [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr. Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr. Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment). [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016. As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s cross-appeal. II. Preliminary Matter [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal. This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with several judges but did not name those judges. [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. F-7: 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal. […] 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale. […] 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court. 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les juges de la Cour fédérale. [7] However, these subsections only provide that the judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this section. [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that: 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale. 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en matière civile et pénale. [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that appeal book. [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a conflict in any matter related to him. [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court. Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court. [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that such judge had a conflict. [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr. Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he was a member of such firm. [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb, focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada over 10 years ago. [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer. [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable apprehension of bias: 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the reasonable apprehension of bias: … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or unconsciously, would not decide fairly." [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v. Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R. (4th) 193). [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v. Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict: 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement, as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified. 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances." 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J. in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.), for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge. His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19. 30 That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept, that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85: To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making, or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making. 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with his former firm for a considerable period of time. 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage. In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving events from over a decade ago. (emphasis added) [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice Webb hearing this appeal. [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R. (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm. [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4 F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr. Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law. [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD. He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy. [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him to recuse himself. [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself. [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr. Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time, both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry, begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr. Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. III. Issue [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action? IV. Analysis A. Standard of Review [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215, 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law (Hospira at paras. 82-83). [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to interfere. B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the Prothonotary’s Order? [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the Claim in its entirety without leave to amend: 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006 in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court. (…) 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance. A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he suspects he is barred from the House of Commons. [footnotes omitted]. [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at para. 27). [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada, 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111: [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office: a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct in his or her capacity as public officer; b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly. Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28 (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28). [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in public office because the actors, who barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29). [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321 D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt: …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”. “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald, conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse of process… To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.” (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted). [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered absent a legal or palpable and overriding error. [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons, these allegations are not particularized and are directed against non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such, the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action. [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend. The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26). V. Conclusion [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment, dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety without leave to amend. "Wyman W. Webb" J.A. "David G. Near" J.A. "Mary J.L. Gleason" J.A. FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15. DOCKET: A-48-16 STYLE OF CAUSE: DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN PLACE OF HEARING: Fredericton, New Brunswick DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2017 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: WEBB J.A. NEAR J.A. GLEASON J.A. DATED: October 30, 2017 APPEARANCES: David Raymond Amos For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal (on his own behalf) Jan Jensen For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Nathalie G. Drouin Deputy Attorney General of Canada For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL http://davidraymondamos3. Thursday, 21 December 2017 Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents for years https://www.scribd.com/ https://www.scribd.com/doc/ While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he did not know who Frank McKenna was No partner even a lowly collection dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid. > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 > Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > To: coi@gnb.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Good Day Sir > > After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed > to speak to one of your staff for the first time > > Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who > answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt > at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker > Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. > > These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I > suggested that you study closely. > > This is the docket in Federal Court > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. > > These are digital recordings of the last three hearings > > Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ > > January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ > > April 3rd, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal > > http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. > > > The only hearing thus far > > May 24th, 2017 > > https://archive.org/details/ > > > This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity > > Date: 20151223 > > Docket: T-1557-15 > > Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 > > PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell > > BETWEEN: > > DAVID RAYMOND AMOS > > Plaintiff > > and > > HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN > > Defendant > > ORDER > > (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on > December 14, 2015) > > The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to > the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November > 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim > in its entirety. > > At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a > letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then > capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian > Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg, > (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that letter > he stated: > > As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the > work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you. > You are your brother’s keeper. > > Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former > colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to > expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of > people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses > or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to > me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime > Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former > Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of > Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore; > former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former > Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff > Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court > of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired > Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted > Police. > > In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my > personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many > potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am > of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I > hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in > Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al, > [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding > allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has > requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so. > > > AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of > the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. There > is no order as to costs. > > “B. Richard Bell” > Judge > > > Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment > already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent > to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. > > I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the Court > Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to the > bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of my > lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? > > "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most > > > ---------- Original message ---------- > From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca > Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM > Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in > Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to > submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you > dudes are way past too late > To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à > lalanthier@hotmail.com > > Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca > > Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at > lalanthier@hotmail.com > > To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to > tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca > > Thank you, > > Merci , > > > http://davidraymondamos3. > > > 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war > in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to > allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over > five years after he began his bragging: > > January 13, 2015 > This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate > > December 8, 2014 > Why Canada Stood Tall! > > Friday, October 3, 2014 > Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And > Stupid Justin Trudeau > > Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide > behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. > > When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien > actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign > in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to > the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were > involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were > significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth > of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for > operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute” > Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind. > The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not > deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a > Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to > redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was > less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But > alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s > then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s > incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, > professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle > Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway > campaign of 2006. > > What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then > Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the > Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent, > support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. > > What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling > chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of > less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners > as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a > deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. > > The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have > the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war. > That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by > constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is > remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of > non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government > regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this > instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a > limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. > > President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror > attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state” > Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control, > and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The > initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and > > P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of > the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have > had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical. > Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me. > > Subject: > Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 > From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca > To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > > January 30, 2007 > > WITHOUT PREJUDICE > > Mr. David Amos > > Dear Mr. Amos: > > This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29, > 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. > > Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have > taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve > Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. > > Sincerely, > > Honourable Michael B. Murphy > Minister of Health > > CM/cb > > > Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: > > Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 > From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, > nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, > motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com > CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John. > Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has > forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not > > Dear Mr. Amos, > > Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off > over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I > was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns. > > As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position > is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process > testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the > Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these > services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this > instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done. > > As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false > imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear > that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada > the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment > and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. > > It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on > December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors. > > Sincerely, > > Warren McBeath, Cpl. > GRC Caledonia RCMP > Traffic Services NCO > Ph: (506) 387-2222 > Fax: (506) 387-4622 > E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca > > > > Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., > Office of the Integrity Commissioner > Edgecombe House, 736 King Street > Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 > tel.: 506-457-7890 > fax: 506-444-5224 > e-mail:coi@gnb.ca > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM > Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David > Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a > publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late > To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca > peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal. > david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca, > greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc. > joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc. > peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com , mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca, > Whistleblower@ctv.ca > > https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc- > > http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/ > > http://thedavidamosrant. > > I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell > them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in > Feferal Court? > > Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but > he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT? > > Veritas Vincit > David Raymond Amos > 902 800 0369 > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400 > Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in > the USDOJ for me will ya? > To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com, > cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com, > gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, > bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca, leader@greenparty.ca > Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, > michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com > > QSLS Politics > By Location Visit Detail > Visit 29,419 > Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government) > IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice) > ISP US Dept of Justice > Location Continent : North America > Country : United States (Facts) > State : District of Columbia > City : Washington > Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map) > Language English (U.S.) en-us > Operating System Microsoft WinXP > Browser Internet Explorer 8.0 > Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET > CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2; > DI60SP1001) > Javascript version 1.3 > Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768 > Color Depth : 32 bits > Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm > Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm > Visit Length 0 seconds > Page Views 1 > Referring URL http://www.google.co... > Search Engine google.com > Search Words david amos bernie madoff > Visit Entry Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy- > Visit Exit Page http://qslspolitics....-wendy- > Out Click > Time Zone UTC-5:00 > Visitor's Time Nov 17 2012 12:33:08 pm > Visit Number 29,419 > > http://qslspolitics.blogspot. > > > Could ya tell I am investigating your pension plan bigtime? Its > because no member of the RCMP I have ever encountered has earned it yet > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 11:36:04 -0400 > Subject: This is a brief as I can make my concerns Randy > To: randyedmunds@gov.nl.ca > Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com > > In a nutshell my concerns about the actions of the Investment Industry > affect the interests of every person in every district of every > country not just the USA and Canada. I was offering to help you with > Emera because my work with them and Danny Williams is well known and > some of it is over eight years old and in the PUBLIC Record. > > All you have to do is stand in the Legislature and ask the MInister of > Justice why I have been invited to sue Newfoundland by the > Conservatives > > > Obviously I am the guy the USDOJ and the SEC would not name who is the > link to Madoff and Putnam Investments > > Here is why > > http://banking.senate.gov/ > > Notice the transcripts and webcasts of the hearing of the US Senate > Banking Commitee are still missing? Mr Emory should at least notice > Eliot Spitzer and the Dates around November 20th, 2003 in the > following file > > http://www.checktheevidence. > > http://occupywallst.org/users/ > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Hansen, David"David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca > Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 19:28:44 +0000 > Subject: RE: I just called again Mr Hansen > To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com > > Hello Mr. Amos, > > I manage the Justice Canada civil litigation section in the Atlantic > region. We are only responsible for litigating existing civil > litigation files in which the Attorney General of Canada is a named > defendant or plaintiff. If you are a plaintiff or defendant in an > existing civil litigation matter in the Atlantic region in which > Attorney General of Canada is a named defendant or plaintiff please > provide the court file number, the names of the parties in the action > and your question. I am not the appropriate contact for other > matters. > > Thanks > > David A. Hansen > Regional Director | Directeur régional > General Counsel |Avocat général > Civil Litigation and Advisory | Contentieux des affaires civiles et > services de consultation > Department of Justice | Ministère de la Justice > Suite 1400 – Duke Tower | Pièce 1400 – Tour Duke > 5251 Duke Street | 5251 rue Duke > Halifax, Nova Scotia | Halifax, Nouvelle- Écosse > B3J 1P3 > david.hansen@justice.gc.ca > Telephone | Téléphone (902) 426-3261 / Facsimile | Télécopieur (902) > 426-2329 > This e-mail is confidential and may be protected by solicitor-client > privilege. Unauthorized distribution or disclosure is prohibited. If > you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us and delete > this entire e-mail. > Before printing think about the Environment > Thinking Green, please do not print this e-mail unless necessary. > Pensez vert, svp imprimez que si nécessaire. > > ---------- Original message ---------- From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:04:23 +0000 Subject: Re: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016 To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received Kveðja / Best regards Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office ---------- Original message ---------- From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin. Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 21:03:34 +0000 Subject: RE: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016 To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments. Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires. ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:03:13 -0400 Subject: Before the Next Yankee election methinks folks in Massachusetts may pay attention to my recent posting in CBC of my talk about their Pirate Party and the Election in Iceland to the ERRE Committee of the Canadian Parliament in October of 2016 To: press@masspirates.org, postur <postur@for.is>, smari < smari@immi.is>, smarim <smarim@althingi.is>, smaher < smaher@postmedia.com>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "Bill.Morneau" < Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Cc: maltpoet@gmail.com, Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com, srevilak@masspirates.org, msukin11@gmail.com, jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org, noeseek@gmail.com ---------- Original message ---------- From: Póstur FOR <postur@for.is> Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:30:11 +0000 Subject: Re: Re Federal Court file no T-1557-15 Methinks that the Pirates and even your minions in the RCMP, CSIS, and their pals in CSE FBI, NSA, DHS and INTERPOL made fun the last of "Barrett's Privateers" for way past too long EH Mr Minister Rotten Ralpy Goodale? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Erindi þitt hefur verið móttekið / Your request has been received Kveðja / Best regards Forsætisráðuneytið / Prime Minister's Office https://archive.org/details/ FOIA For Fun and Liberation by Massachusetts Pirate Party Publication date 2016-06-25 Usage http://creativecommons.org/ Topics Massachusetts, Public Records, Secretary of the Commonwealth, FOIA Language English Maya Shaffer is a reporter for the Bay State Examiner, and someone who's used Massachusetts public records law enough to know it inside and out. This is a great talk, where Maya tells her stories of public records requesters in Massachusetts. Highlights include: The time Maya made an in-person FOIA request to NEMLEC -- the Northeastern Massachusetts Law Enforcement Council. NEMLEC wasn't sure how to respond to an in-person request, so they called 911. An agency proposed a $400 fee to process a public records request. The agency takes the $400, but never produces the records. How the city of Boston wanted to charge $10,000 to produce emails between the city, and the Massachusetts Municipal Association How Massachusetts public records laws aren't "real laws", in the sense that they're routinely violated, and the violating party is never punished. The level of apathy and disdain that the Secretary of the Commonwealth has for Massachusetts public records laws. The really neat things you can find out, if you manage to get your public records request fulfilled. Maya's talk was record on June 25, 2016, during PirateCon 2016. Identifier foia-for-fun-and-liberation Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.3 Taped by Steve Revilak Year 2016 http://www.baystateexaminer. https://twitter.com/ https://masspirates.org/blog/ The Massachusetts Pirate Party was formed in May, 2010 by James O’Keefe, Chris Reynolds and Erik Zoltan. We are active in promoting privacy, transparent government, and innovation by reining in copyright laws and eliminating patent laws. We ran candidates for State Representative in 2014 and 2016 and elected our first office holder in 2015. Pirate Council Captain – James O’Keefe / jokeefe@jamesokeefe.org / 617-447-0210 / @jpokeefe / Key Id: 0xAAFF1FEC First Officer – Noelani Kamelamela / noeseek@gmail.com / 617-901-4076 / Key Id: 0x358758A8 Quartermaster – Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com PR/Media Director – Open Activism Director – Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com Swarmwise Director – Open Web/Info Director – Open Council of Arbitrators Steve Revilak / srevilak@masspirates.org / 781-648-1083 / @Purple_Bandanna / Key Id: 0x28C2A300 Moses Sukin / msukin11@gmail.com / 585-748-9347 Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com Representative to the United States Pirate Party Sam Capradae / maltpoet@gmail.com Joseph Onoroski / Joseph.P.Onoroski@gmail.com To contact us, please email press@masspirates.org or call/txt us at (617) 863-6277. Press distribution If you would like to receive Pirate Party press releases, email press@masspirates.org and we will add you to our press list. http://www.cbc.ca/news/ A year later, Trudeau will only revisit electoral reform if pushed by other parties — something MPs don't buy PM says proportional representation would divide MPs, be harmful to Canadians By Elise von Scheel, CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 11:53 AM ET 482 Comments Commenting is now closed for this story. bill chagwich bill chagwich YES FOLKS, I was elected to help you,but to my own interest electoral reform will not work for me or my voter base, therefore take my promise and kinda forget about it, the honorable Justin Trudeau better know as what I promise means nothing,just a election plot bill chagwich bill chagwich @bill chagwich we all know what this is all about,CAMPAIGNING on the middle class tax payers dime Darryl McBride Darryl McBride @bill chagwich Reinforcing, how can one have credibility with no ethics. David Amos David Amos @bill chagwich Friday, October 7, 2016 Friday, Oct. 7, 2016 Electoral Reform Meeting 39 The Chair: Thank you very much. Mr. David Amos, the floor is yours. Mr. David Amos (As an Individual): Mr. Chair, I ran for public office five times against your party. That said, I ran against Mr. DeCourcey's boss right here in Fredericton in the election for the 39th Parliament. I was not aware of this committee meeting in Fredericton today until I heard Mr. DeCourcey speaking on CBC this morning. I don't pretend to know something I don't, but I'm a quick study. I thought I had paid my dues to sit on the panel. I notified the clerks in a timely fashion, but I received no response. At least I get another minute and a half. The previous speaker answered the $64,000 question: 338. I can name every premier in the country. Governor Maggie Hassan is my governor in New Hampshire. The people there who sit in the house get paid $100 a year plus per diem expenses. I think that's the way to run a government. There are lots of seats in the house for a very small state. My understanding of this hearing is that you have to report to Mr. Trudeau by December 1, because he said during the election that if he were elected Prime Minister, the 42nd Parliament, which I also ran in, would be the last first-past-the-post election. You don't have much time, so my suggestion to the clerks today, which I published and sent to the Prime Minister of Iceland and his Attorney General, was to do what Iceland does. Just cut and paste their rules. They have no first past the post. They have a pending election. David Amos David Amos @David Amos A former friend of mine, Birgitta Jónsdóttir, founded a party there, for which there is no leader. It is the Pirate Party. It's high in the polls right now with no leader. That's interesting. I tweeted this. You folks said that you follow tweets, so you should have seen what I tweeted before I came here this evening. That said, as a Canadian, I propose something else. Number one, my understanding of the Constitution and what I read about law.... There was a constitutional expert named Edgar Schmidt who sued the government. He was the man who was supposed to vet bills for Peter MacKay to make sure they were constitutionally correct. He did not argue the charter. He argued Mr. Diefenbaker's Bill of Rights. In 2002 I read a document filed by a former deputy minister of finance, Kevin Lynch, who later became Mr. Harper's clerk of the Privy Council. Now he's on an independent board of the Chinese oil company that bought Nexen. As deputy minister of finance, he reported to the American Securities and Exchange Commission on behalf of the corporation known as Canada. It is a very interesting document that I saved and forwarded to you folks. It says that he was in a quandary about whether the charter was in effect. (2005) David Amos David Amos @David Amos The Chair: Could it be in relation to a particular voting system? Mr. David Amos: According to Mr. Lynch, because of the failure of the Meech Lake and Charlottetown accords, he was in a quandary as to whether the charter was in effect. I know that the Supreme Court argues it on a daily basis. That charter, created by Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Chrétien, his attorney general at the time, gave me the right to run for public office and vote as a Canadian citizen. However, in the 1990s, Mr. Chrétien came out with a law, and because I am a permanent American resident, I can't vote. Yet the charter says I can. The Chair: That's a— Mr. David Amos: That said, that's been argued in court. In 2000, Mr. Chrétien came out with a law that said I couldn't vote. Right? He also took away my social insurance number. The Chair: I don't know about the case— Mr. David Amos: No, he did. The Chair: But I don't know about the case. Mr. David Amos: I did prove, after I argued with Elections Canada's lawyers in 2004.... You might have taken away my right to vote, but you can't stop me from running for public office, and I proved it five times. The Chair: Given that you're an experienced candidate— Mr. David Amos: Very experienced. The Chair: —does that experience provide you with a particular insight on the voting systems we're looking at? Mr. David Amos: In Mr. Trudeau's words, he has to come up with a plan and no more first past the post. My suggestion to you, in my contact today, is to cut and paste Iceland's rules. David Amos David Amos @David Amos The Chair: What kind of system does Iceland have? Mr. David Amos: It's just what you need, just what Mr. Trudeau is ordering now. It's proportional elections. The Chair: Is it MMP, or is it just...? Mr. David Amos: I tweeted you the beginner's book for Iceland. The Chair: Okay, we'll look at Iceland. We're just checking on the kind of system they have, but I appreciate the input, especially from a candidate, from somebody who has run many times. But we do have— Mr. David Amos: I have two other points, because I don't think you can pull this off. I don't think it will happen. The Chair: Well, I'm hoping we do. Mr. David Amos: Here is my suggestion. You guys are going north. The Chair: Yes. Mr. David Amos: Look how parliamentarians are elected in the Northwest Territories. There is no party, and I like that. The Chair: That's true. We were just up in Yellowknife, in fact, and we learned all about that. That's why it's good for us to be travelling the country. But, sir, I— Mr. David Amos: I have one more suggestion. The Chair: One more. Mr. David Amos: Mr. Harper changed the Canada Elections Act and I still couldn't vote. The Chair: Yes, I was in the House when that happened. David Amos David Amos @David Amos Mr. David Amos: Anyway, that said, when you alter the Canada Elections Act, make it.... The biggest problem we have is, look at the vast majority of people who, like me, have never voted in their life. Apathy rules the day. The Chair: Except that you've put us on to an idea about Iceland— Mr. David Amos: Let me finish. I suggest that you make voting mandatory, such as Australia does. Make it that if you don't vote, it costs you money, just like if you don't report to Statistics Canada. The Chair: Well, we're talking about that. That is part of our mandate, to look at mandatory voting and online voting. You already had your last suggestion. (2010) Mr. David Amos: Put in the line, “none of the above”, and if “none of the above” wins— The Chair: That's right, we've heard that, too. Mr. David Amos: Well, I haven't. The Chair: We've heard that in our testimony. Mr. David Amos: You and I will be talking again, trust me on that one, by way of writing. You answered my emails, Ma'am. The Chair: Thank you very much, sir. Now we'll hear from Julie Maitland. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Gallant, Premier Brian (PO/CPM)"<Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000 Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for writing to the Premier of New Brunswick. Please be assured that your email will be reviewed. If this is a media request, please forward your email to media-medias@gnb.camedia- > . Thank you! ****************************** Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le premier ministre du Nouveau-Brunswick. Soyez assuré(e) que votre courriel sera examiné. Si ceci est une demande médiatique, prière de la transmettre à media-medias@gnb.camedia- ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Critch, Crystal (JPS/JSP)"<Crystal.Critch@gnb.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:29 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Veuillez prendre note que je serai hors du bureau jusqu'au 5 février 2018. En cas d'urgence, veuillez communiquer avec la réception au 506 453-4230. Please note that I am out of the office until February 5, 2018. In case of emergency, please contact reception at 506 453-4230. thank you/merci, Crystal Critch ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Jensen, Jan"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:23 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> I will be out of office and will have limited email access until I return on Monday, February 5th, 2018. If you require immediate assistance, please contact my assistant at (902) 426 1798. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "Fitch, Leanne"<leanne.fitch@fredericton.ca> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:24 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Due to a very high volume of incoming email to this account there is an unusual backlog of pending responses. Your query may not be responded to in a timely fashion. If you require a formal response please send your query in writing to my attention c/o Fredericton Police Force, 311 Queen St, Fredericton, NB E3B 1B1 or phone (506) 460-2300. This e-mail communication (including any or all attachments) is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any use, review, retransmission, distribution, dissemination, copying, printing, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this e-mail, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any printout thereof, immediately. Your co-operation is appreciated. Any correspondence with elected officials, employees, or other agents of the City of Fredericton may be subject to disclosure under the provisions of the Province of New Brunswick Right to Information and Protection of Privacy Act. Le présent courriel (y compris toute pièce jointe) s'adresse uniquement à son destinataire, qu'il soit une personne ou un organisme, et pourrait comporter des renseignements privilégiés ou confidentiels. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire du courriel, il est interdit d'utiliser, de revoir, de retransmettre, de distribuer, de disséminer, de copier ou d'imprimer ce courriel, d'agir en vous y fiant ou de vous en servir de toute autre façon. Si vous avez reçu le présent courriel par erreur, prière de communiquer avec l'expéditeur et d'éliminer l'original du courriel, ainsi que toute copie électronique ou imprimée de celui-ci, immédiatement. Nous sommes reconnaissants de votre collaboration. Toute correspondance entre ou avec les employés ou les élus de la Ville de Fredericton pourrait être divulguée conformément aux dispositions de la Loi sur le droit à l’information et la protection de la vie privée. GOV-OP-073 ---------- Original message ---------- From: Newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:26 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Thank you for contacting The Globe and Mail. If your matter pertains to newspaper delivery or you require technical support, please contact our Customer Service department at 1-800-387-5400 or send an email to customerservice@globeandmail. If you are reporting a factual error please forward your email to publiceditor@globeandmail.com< Letters to the Editor can be sent to letters@globeandmail.com This is the correct email address for requests for news coverage and press releases. ---------- Original message ---------- From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin. Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 16:02:27 +0000 Subject: RE: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your comments. Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos commentaires. ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 12:02:19 -0400 Subject: Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? To: "Norman.Sabourin"<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2"<denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca, "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming" < hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>, caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca, george.filliter@gnb.ca, michael.bray@fosterandcompany. "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay" < Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca < nbpc@gnb.ca>, andre <andre@jafaust.com>, jbosnitch < jbosnitch@gmail.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "martin.gaudet"<martin.gaudet@fredericton.ca> < Leanne.Fitch@fredericton.ca>, "marc.giroux" < marc.giroux@fja-cmf.gc.ca>, "jan.jensen"<jan.jensen@justice.gc.ca>, "bill.pentney"<bill.pentney@justice.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> George.S.Rideout@gnb.ca, Danielle.Elliott@gnb.ca, "Dominic.Cardy" < Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc" < Hon.Dominic.LeBlanc@canada.ca < Bill.Morneau@canada.ca> http://davidraymondamos3. Friday, 2 February 2018 Yo Norman Sabourin Need I say that the no-name assistant of your buddy Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today? The Crown Corp commonly known as the CBC is telling us some interesting tales lately while Google continues to blog my long emails. However there is mre than one way to skin a cat and use Google's resources to do so EH? Methinks that as Drapeau quits and his questionable buddy Rideout takes on the boss on Premier Gallant's behalf while he tries to buy the next election things are becoming incredibly comical within the justice system and the political scene of the LIEbrano so called "Place to Be" N'esy Pas? In my humble opinion Justices Drapeau and Smith and Bell in particular should have done the right thing to see justice served on my Clan's behalf LONG AGO if only because of their positions on the Canadian Judicial Council but what do I know I am just the dumb Maritimer you have been ignoring since 2005 CORRECT Norman Sabourin? https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/ New Brunswick The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada Anyway the no-name lady I talked to again today Justice Smith's office certainly remember me and recalled getting the email fund below. Hence methinks I should take a guess at Justice George S. Rideout's email address and call him next to see if he even knows who I am like Cst Rideout of the Fat Fred City Finest (badge # 127) did in on a rainy night in front of the RCMP HQ in April of 2007 You dudes call them Yellow Stripers N'esy Pas Martin Gaudet and Leanne Fitch? The Hon. George S. Rideout Justice: Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Moncton Judges Chambers 145 Assumption Blvd., PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1 Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3 Phone: 506-856-2301 ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:13:56 -0400 Subject: Attn Judge David Smith To: david.d.smith@gnb.ca Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> The Hon. David D. Smith Chief Justice (Moncton): Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Moncton Judges Chambers 145 Assumption Blvd., PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1 Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3 Phone: 506-856-2300 Fax: 506-856-2751 Email: david.d.smith@gnb.ca It was quite a wicked email and everybody knows that I published it within my blog long ago http://davidraymondamos3. Thursday, 23 June 2016 There is no need for Judge David Smith's lawyer, Michael Bray to be in a quandary In My humble opinion Federal Court has the proper jurisdiction to hear his complaint against the CROWN Now we have the news that CBC offers us today N'esy Pas Chucky Leblanc and Andre Faust? ---------- Original message ---------- From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2018 20:43:37 -0400 Subject: Hey Jason tell Sam Sutter I just called (508) 491-1025 and tried to leave a voicemail but a woman picked up and asked me my business and I would not tell her To: JASON@resminilaw.com, info@jhcom.net Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com> Call us : 401.831.6123 Mail us : info@jhcom.net Former Fall River Mayor Will Not Pursue Mayoral Bid in 2017 Providence, RI (July 26th, 2017) – The Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini has added a new attorney, Sam Sutter, Esq., to their expanding team. An experienced and well-known practicing attorney since 1984, Mr. Sutter will be focusing on expanding the firm’s growing clientele in Bristol County. In accepting the position at the firm, Mr. Sutter has decided to forgo a run for Mayor of Fall River this November. “I am pleased to have Mr. Sutter join our team,” says Ronald J. Resmini, Founder of the Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, “His reputation speaks for itself and he will be an invaluable asset to our firm. In addition to his tremendous legal experience, Sam has always fought for what he believes in – this dedication will serve our clients well as he advocates on their behalf.” Prior to joining the Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, Mr. Sutter spent the first 7 years of his in private practice on Cape Cod. In 1991, he went on to work as an assistant district attorney in the Bristol County District Attorney’s Office. He then received the Prosecutor of the Year award from Mothers Against Drunk Driving in 1992. He was promoted to Superior Court in 1995, where he spent 4 years handling major felony cases. During this time, he tried eighteen Superior Court cases to verdict and won sixteen of them. In 2006, Mr. Sutter was successfully elected Bristol County District Attorney, and was awarded the Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Lawyer of the Year award. Sutter is eager to put his decades of experience to work for the clients of Ronald J. Resmini, stating: “I went to law school to make a positive difference in people’s lives. I knew that someday I would come back to practicing law. This opportunity has come along at just the right time in my life. I was looking for the right partnership and once I started talking to the Resmini’s I knew I had found the right team.” Once elected District Attorney, Mr. Sutter served for a total of 8 years leading the Bristol County District Attorney’s office. He began his second term in 2010 and that same month became president of the Massachusetts District Attorney’s Association. After a special election in 2014, Sutter served as Mayor of Fall River for one year and returned to private practice in 2016 concentrating in personal injury. Mr. Sutter resides in Fall River with his wife, Dorothy. About the Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini The Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini is a personal injury law firm serving all of Rhode Island and Massachusetts with offices in Providence, RI and Seekonk, MA. The firm celebrated 45 years of practicing law in 2015. Mr. Resmini is nationally recognized for his expertise in uninsured motorist cases and has authored more than twenty RI Law Institute handbooks on Personal Injury Law, Product Liability, Trial and Settlement Practice, Domestic Relations and other litigation topics. For more information, please visit www.resminilawoffices.com or call 401.444.4444. https://www.resminilawoffices. Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, LTD. local 401.751.8855 Available 24/7 Attorney Meet Sam Sutter, Esq Sam Sutter graduated from Brown University in 1976. At Brown, he played for the collegiate varsity tennis team and compiled the best singles record on the team. Following his undergraduate career, Mr. Sutter spent the next three years traveling to fifteen different countries, teaching tennis professionally and playing in professional tournaments. Following his travels, Mr. Sutter started law school at Vanderbilt University School of Law and graduated in 1983. The first seven years of his career, Mr. Sutter was in private practice on Cape Cod, concentrating in criminal defense. Beginning in January of 1991, he then went to work as an assistant district attorney in the Bristol County District Attorney’s Office. He spent four years prosecuting cases in the district court and tried over two hundred cases. In 1992, he received the Prosecutor of the Year award from Mothers against Drunk Driving and the organization featured him in their national publication. In 1995, he was promoted to Superior Court, and he spent the next four years handling major felony cases. During this time, Mr. Sutter tried eighteen Superior Court cases to verdict and won sixteen of them. In 1999, he returned to private practice to concentrate on personal injury and criminal defense. The next year, he began giving free tennis clinics to the Fall River youth and taught several hundred kids in Fall River how to play the game over the next seven years. For his contribution to the local community, the Fall River Herald News named Sam Sutter Coach of the Year in 2005. In 2006, due to an upsurge in gun violence, gang activity, and unsolved homicide cases, he ran for District Attorney against a sixteen-year incumbent who had close to a million dollars in his campaign account. He won the election against the odds. For his upset victory, Mr. Sutter won the Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Lawyer of the Year award in 2006. For the next eight years, he served the people of Bristol County as their District Attorney and led an office that made great progress in reducing gun violence and decreasing gang activity, solving cold cases, and promoting the rights of victims. Mr. Sutter also received the SouthCoast Man of the Year award for 2007. In 2010, he received the Massachusetts Nursing Association’s “Advocate for Nursing” award. In November of 2010, he was elected to a second term as Bristol County District Attorney. Later that month, he became president of the Massachusetts District Attorney’s Association. For the next four years, Mr. Sutter led an office that continued to make great strides in reducing gun violence. In 2013, he oversaw the investigation of the murder of Odin Lloyd, which led to the arrest, indictment, and subsequent conviction of Aaron Hernandez, the former all-pro for the New England Patriots. In 2014, concerned about political instability in his hometown of Fall River, he ran for mayor in a special election and won. For changing the direction of his career and winning that special election, as well as for the continued success of the Bristol County District Attorney’s Office, Sutter again received the Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Lawyer of the Year award. Sutter served one year as Mayor of Fall River. He focused on fostering economic development, which he did with the securing of a new Amazon Fulfillment Center, the redevelopment of the New Harbor Mall, and the expansion of small businesses throughout the city. Mr. Sutter also, as Mayor, served as Chairman of the School Committee in a year that saw continued progress in the Fall River Public Schools. His administration was also able to produce and pass a balanced budget during a very difficult fiscal climate. In 2016, Sutter returned to the private practice of law, and he is now excited to begin his collaboration with Resmini Law. He lives with his wife, Dorothy, in Fall River. They have three children: two sons and one daughter. Request Free Consultation Call us today for a free initial consultation. We promise to call back within the hour if we are busy, and we personally take your calls, not a call center. Rhode Island Office The Packet Building Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, LTD. Address155 S Main St #400, Providence, RI 02903 phone(401) 751-8855 Massachusetts Office The Resmini Building Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, LTD. Address41 Mink St, Seekonk, MA 02771 phone(508) 336-0500 Warwick Office Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, LTD. Address1345 Jefferson Blvd #3, Warwick, RI 02886 By Appointment Only phone(401) 352-5271 Newport Office Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, LTD. Address1 Court House St #2B, Newport, RI 02840 By Appointment Only phone(401) 367-4655 Fall River Office Law Offices of Ronald J. Resmini, LTD. Address215 Bank Street, Suite 4, Fall River, MA 02720 By Appointment Only phone(508) 491-1025 Areas Served Barrington, RI Bristol, RI Burrillville, RI Central Falls, RI Coventry, RI Cranston, RI Cumberland, RI Johnston, RI Lincoln, RI Middletown, RI Narragansett, RI Newport, RI Pawtucket, RI Portsmouth, RI Providence, RI South County, RI South Kingstown, RI Smithfield, RI Warwick, RI Westerly, RI Woonsocket, RI Attleborough, MA Boston, MA and surrounding areas Bristol county MA Fall River, MA New Bedford, MA Seekonk, MA Taunton, MA Connecticut Florida New York Washington, D.C. Providence RI, Warwick RI, Cranston RI, Pawtucket RI, Woonsocket RI, Coventry RI, Cumberland RI, New Bedford MA, Fall River MA, Attleboro MA, Seekonk MA, Newport, RI, Barrington, RI, Burrilville, RI |
2018 by Law Office of Ronald J. Resmini, LTD.
All rights reserved. | Disclaimer | Google + | Privacy Policy |
Helpful Legal Websites | Sitemap
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Youtube Youtube
Click for live chat!
LIVE CHAT - ONLINE NOW
Hi, we are here to help if you have questions.
YES
, start now!
LIVE CHAT
The information disclosed in this conversation does not constitute or
create a lawyer-client relationship.
We respect your privacy. Your personal information will only be
supplied to the chosen business, who may contact you using modern
phone equipment, which may include auto-dialers and text. Consent is
not a condition for purchase or hire.
You have entered the conversation. Waiting on operator...
Alanis has entered the conversation.
Alanis
Hi, I am Alanis. How may I assist you?
Are we still connected?
Visitor
I would like to talk to Sam Sutter
Alanis
We may be able to help you with that. Do you mind explaining the
situation in a bit more detail?
Visitor
Are you a lawyer?
Alanis
I'm part of the live chat support team for the firm, and my job is to
connect people with the most appropriate lawyer for their situation.
Would you mind sharing some brief details about the situation?
Visitor
I am the guy with all the wiretap tapes of the mob in MA
Alanis
I understand.
May I ask your name?
Visitor
Sure I am very well known just Google me David Raymond Amos wiretap tape
Alanis
I would be more than happy to forward your contact information and ask
that you be contacted as soon as possible.
What would be the best number for us to call?
Is there an email address you'd like to provide in case they miss you by phone?
Visitor
902 800 0369 Tell Mr Suuter I am about to send him an email in the BCC line
Alanis
May I also get your email address?
Visitor
The email will come from motomaniac333@gmail.com
The chat session has ended.
Send
Copyright (c) 2016 MH Sub I, LLC. All Rights Reserved