https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/doug-ford-scott-moe-announcement-1.4882428

Doug Ford attacks 'terrible tax' on carbon alongside Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe

Both provinces fighting imposition of federal tax in court

John Rieti· CBC News· Posted: Oct 29, 2018 12:26 PM ET






 
David Amos


Ontario Premier Doug Ford kept up his criticism of a federal carbon tax Monday calling the plan "nothing more than a complete scam."

Ford made his latest attack on the planned tax alongside Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe, who echoed Ford's remarks, calling a federal carbon tax a "sham" and a "vote-buying scheme." Both provinces are involved in a court challenge against the imposition of the tax.
Last week, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau went to Etobicoke — the riding Ford represents — to announce a federal carbon tax is coming to Ontario, which scrapped its cap-and-trade system earlier this year.

Ford's government hasn't announced what it will do to fight climate change, however, the premier said an announcement is coming soon about how it plans to tackle pollution. Queen's Park will come down on emitters, he said, like nothing they've seen before.

There was swift condemnation of Ford's statement.

Keith Stewart, a senior energy strategist with Greenpeace Canada, demanded Ford spell out exactly how his government will protect people from the dangers of climate change — including floods, heatwaves and powerful storms.

"If the two premiers dislike the federal carbon price, then all they have to do is meet or beat it with their own climate policy," Stewart said in an email to CBC Toronto.

Stewart added today's words amount to nothing more than an "evidence-free attack on climate action."

Ontario families to get $300 tax credit as part of federal plan

Trudeau has vowed every nickel raised from the federal tax will go back to Ontario.

Ottawa will levy a tax of $20 on every tonne of greenhouse gas emissions starting in 2019, rising by $10 each year to $50 a tonne by 2022.

Ontarians will likely pay more at the gas station as a result, but the federal government said most families will receive a tax break of about $300 per year.
Meanwhile, Ford said that amounts to "trying to buy Canadians with their own money," and warned the tax will drive up the price of virtually everything while also killing thousands of jobs.

"It's a terrible tax," he said.

Leaders sketch out trade deal

Ford added that he and Moe have signed a memorandum of understanding to lower trade barriers between Ontario and Saskatchewan.

Ford says that Canada has focused on free trade with the United States at the expense of internal trade.
The premiers say tackling interprovincial trade barriers is key to ensure Canada stays economically competitive.

"I hear from business leaders that this is one of the primary obstacles to attracting new investment and jobs to our country. We can't afford not to act," Ford said.

"I look forward to working with other provinces to bring these trade barriers down."



http://www.bloggingtories.ca/forums/post114915.html


Posted: Mon Apr 16, 2018 8:40 am    Post subject: Ford campaign team has harper era experience

( it appears ford is well prepared for the election with a campaign team nearly ready , many of who are very experiences in politics and elections ) Ford’s tight-knit Ontario election campaign team stacked with Harper-era players By Laura Ryckewaert Apr. 16, 2018 The Ford campaign team so far includes Kory Teneycke, Jenni Byrne, Chris Froggatt, Dean French, Michael Diamond, Fred DeLorey, Ian Todd, Melissa Lantsman, and Melanie Paradis, among others. Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Doug Ford has the advantage of name recognition in the upcoming Ontario election race, says Ken Boessenkool, eliminating the 'heavy lifting that goes on in a campaign for a lesser known candidate.' The Hill Times photograph by Andrew Meade Ontario’s provincial parties are in campaign-mode, and new Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader Doug Ford has a tight-knit team in place, stacked with experience at both the federal and provincial levels. “They’ve all spent a ton of time together in the last 10 to 15 years, so even though they were thrown together quickly out of circumstance, it’s a very tight-knit, impressive team,” said Ken Boessenkool, who was previously tapped to shape the Ontario PC platform under former leader Patrick Brown. Mr. Boessenkool is no longer involved with the campaign. He resigned after sexual misconduct allegations against Mr. Brown were reported by CTV in January and has since returned to Calgary. Mr. Brown denies the allegations and is suing CTV. Mr. Ford was elected leader of the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party on March 10. With so little time between becoming leader and the June 7 Ontario provincial election—and with Mr. Ford not currently holding a seat at the provincial legislature—the official opposition leader’s office at Queen’s Park is in the midst of a somewhat suspended transition. OLO staff are generally expected to join the campaign once the writ drops, and new strategists are already on board with Team Ford. Mr. Ford will be running in Etobicoke North in the upcoming election. The writ is set to drop on May 9, but there’s speculation it could happen even sooner. Ontario PC MPP Vic Fedeli is currently in charge of the operation of the OLO as acting leader at the legislature. There’s currently no one in place as chief of staff. Former chief of staff Alykhan Velshi departed before the leadership race. John Sinclair is a deputy chief of staff in the OLO, as is Amin Massoudi, who’s set to play a senior communications role on the campaign once it officially begins. Amin Massoudi. Photograph courtesy of LinkedIn Mr. Massoudi is a former strategic adviser with Amir Remtulla & Associates and a former senior consultant with the Capitol Hill Group. He was previously executive assistant to Mr. Ford in his Toronto city councillor’s office, and later tackled communications for then-Toronto mayor Rod Ford. Mitchell Davidson is director of policy and legislative affairs in the OLO, a role he’s held since 2015, having first joined the office as a policy adviser the year before. He’s expected to play a key role in developing the party’s campaign platform. Jeff Silverstein is currently director of communications in the OLO, while Simon Jefferies is press secretary. Both are also expected to lend their efforts to the campaign once it’s officially underway. Another current senior OLO staffer is Max Aulbrook, manager of operations and caucus relations, among others. “There’s parliamentary things that need to get done, and there’s a small group of people in the leader’s office who are getting that done, but that’s not the focus. We’re into the campaign,” said Mr. Boessenkool. He said the OLO and campaign aides are in regular contact to “set the direction for the day so no one’s running off in strange and odd directions.” “This is a very disciplined candidate, a very disciplined team,” said Mr. Boessenkool. Kory Tenecyke. The Hill Times file photograph Kory Teneycke is Mr. Ford’s campaign manager. A former vice-president of the Sun News Network, Mr. Teneycke has worked for the federal Progressive Conservatives and the Reform and Canadian Alliance parties, including in then-Reform party leader Preston Manning’s office as official opposition leader. Federally, he also worked as director of the Conservative Caucus Research Bureau; communications director to then prime minister Stephen Harper; and chief spokesperson for Conservative Party’s 2015 campaign. Provincially, he’s a former senior policy adviser to then Ontario PC premier Mike Harris and has worked on various campaigns, including in Alberta and Saskatchewan. He was also part of Mr. Ford’s leadership campaign team. Outside of politics, he’s been executive director of the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association, and more recently a director with Coriolis Public Affairs. Michael Diamond. Photograph courtesy of LinkedIn Second to Mr. Teneycke is campaign director Michael Diamond, who was campaign manager for Mr. Ford’s leadership bid. Mr. Diamond has worked on campaigns for the Manitoba and Nova Scotia Progressive Conservative parties; was deputy campaign manager to then Ontario PC MPP Peter Shurman in 2007; director of operations for Rob Ford’s successful 2010 mayoral bid; and was part of Conservative MP Kellie Leitch’s recent federal leadership campaign. Former Ontario PC party vice-president Dean French is chair of Mr. Ford’s campaign. He’s previously been a fundraiser for Rob Ford; an organizer and senior adviser to then-Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day, including on Mr. Day’s leadership campaign; ran unsuccessfully for a seat on Toronto’s city council for Ward 3, Etobicoke Centre, in 2014; and is a former president of the Etobicoke-Lakeshore Conservative riding association. Chris Froggatt. The Hill Times file photograph National Public Relations managing partner Chris Froggatt is vice-chair of Mr. Ford’s campaign. A former adviser to Mr. Manning as official opposition leader on the Hill, he went on to work for Ernie Eves’ PC government and later opposition team at Queen’s Park, starting as a senior adviser to then transport minister Brad Clark, and later becoming executive assistant to then Ontario MPP John Baird. Mr. Froggatt returned to the Hill to serve as Mr. Baird’s chief of staff as a minister under the Harper government through a number of portfolios from 2006 to 2010. “I understand it’s a bit of a three-legged stool, with Kory and Chris and Dean, who are kind of overall setting the main thrust of the campaign,” said longtime Conservative staffer Garry Keller, now a vice-president at StrategyCorp in Ottawa. Mr. Keller is not involved in Mr. Ford’s campaign. Michael Crase is executive director of the Ontario PC Party, and as such, will be a key player on the campaign. Mr. Crase is a well-known Ontario organizer and campaign manager, including heading Conservative MP Tony Clement’s brief 2017 federal leadership campaign. He’s also a former assistant to Conservative MP Stella Ambler. Jenni Bryne. Photograph courtesy of Facebook Jenni Byrne will be a target seat director for the campaign, focused on mapping out key ridings for the team to target. Ms. Byrne is a former senior adviser, director of issues management, and deputy chief of staff to Mr. Harper as prime minister, and ran the Conservative Party’s 2011 and 2015 election campaigns (the former alongside the late Doug Finley). She was also in the federal party’s 2008 campaign war room, and later served as the Conservative Party’s director of operations. On the campaign, Ms. Byrne will be working closely alongside her successor as Conservative Party operations director, Fred DeLorey, who’s been tapped to serve as the ‘Get Out the Vote’ director for Mr. Ford. A former communications director for the federal Conservatives, Mr. DeLorey ran unsuccessfully as candidate for the federal party in Central Nova, N.S. in the 2015 election, after which he became a principal with DeLorey & Associates. He also previously served as an Atlantic adviser to Mr. Harper. Ian Todd. Photograph courtesy of LinkedIn Ian Todd is director of Mr. Ford’s leader’s tour. He was director of tour for former Conservative minister Jason Kenney’s Alberta leadership campaign, and was director of Mr. Harper’s national tour during the 2008, 2011, and 2015 federal elections. He’s a former policy analyst to Brian Mulroney, a former deputy chief of staff to Mr. Manning, a former chief of staff to Mr. Day as leader, and a former chief of staff to then B.C. Liberal premier Gordon Campbell’s office. Federally, Mr. Todd has also been chief of staff to then human resources minister Monte Solberg and to then heritage minister James Moore. Melissa Lantsman. Photograph courtesy of LinkedIn Melissa Lantsman is head of the war room’s communications. A senior director at CIBC Capital Markets for the last two years up until January, she was previously director of communications to former Conservative finance minister Joe Oliver, and at the federal level has also worked for then-foreign affairs minister Lawrence Cannon, then-trade minister Peter Van Loan, and then-environment minister Peter Kent. Ms. Lantsman is also a former senior adviser for public affairs for Coca-Cola Canada and was part of Caroline Mulroney’s recent PC leadership campaign. Melanie Paradis. Photograph courtesy of LinkedIn Melanie Paradis is also a senior communications aide to Mr. Ford. She was director of communications for Christine Elliott’s unsuccessful PC leadership campaign, and did the same job for Conservative MP Erin O’Toole’s federal leadership bid in 2017. Ms. Paradis is also a former director of lands, resources and consultation for the Métis Nation of Ontario, and a former manager of public affairs and corporate communications for National Public Relations, among other past jobs. Andrew Kimber will be the campaign war room’s lead on issues management. He’s been working for Advocis, the Financial Advisors Association of Canada, in Toronto since 2015, and before then was research director for Sun Media. From May 2011 to May 2014, Mr. Kimber was deputy director of issues management for the Ontario PC Party. Lyndsey Vanstone is Mr. Ford’s executive assistant. She previously served as press secretary during his leadership campaign, and has a background in news, including as a former producer with Newstalk 1010’s The Live Drive with John Tory and as a former assignment editor with CP24, among many other past roles. Simone Daniels will also be playing a senior role on the Ford campaign. According to LinkedIn, she’s been director of sales, government relations and marketing at Deco Labels & Flexible Packaging, the company owned by Mr. Ford’s family, and was an administrative assistant at Toronto city hall during Rob Ford’s time as mayor. Patrick Tuns is outreach and nominations director. He’s a former executive assistant to then Conservative MP Parm Gill on the Hill from 2013 up until Mr. Gill’s defeat in the 2015 federal election, and of late, has been working as a consultant with his own firm, according to LinkedIn. Mr. Keller said at this point in the game, Mr. Ford’s team would be focused on sorting out who all will be in their campaign war room, and he expects more names to be announced as it gets closer to E-day on June 7. Noting the weight of experience among the Ford team, including aides who’ve worked together in the past, Mr. Keller said he expects it’ll be an integrated team that’ll work well together, without egos getting in the way. “I don’t think it’s going to be a very siloed campaign at all. I think everybody’s going to put their shoulders to the wheel on this one,” he said. He’s also expecting Mr. Ford to run a straightforward campaign, “old school style campaign,” heavy on face-to-face interactions. “At the same time this is 2018, and I think you’ll probably also see a very aggressive online and digital campaign as well,” said Mr. Keller. He noted there’s been some speculation that Mr. Ford will take a similar election platform approach as Mr. Harper did in the 2006 election, which saw the federal Conservatives unseat Paul Martin’s Liberal government. “I don’t think you’re going to see a big 80-page platform…. Some have mused that it’ll follow sort of a repeat of Mr. Harper’s 2006 campaign, the five priorities, something easy to communicate to voters at the door,” said Mr. Keller. Mr. Boessenkool said he expects the upcoming Ontario election to essentially be a “referendum on Kathleen Wynne and the Liberal style of management,” adding an advantage for Team Ford will be their leader’s name recognition. “He doesn’t suffer from any of the things Brown suffered from in the early days, which is that the people of Ontario didn’t have a clue who he was. Everyone knows who Doug Ford is,” said Mr. Boessenkool. “A lot of that sort of heavy lifting that goes on in a campaign for a lesser known candidate sort of is already there for him and that’s a huge advantage.” https://www.hilltimes.com/2018/04/16/pc-leader-fords-tight-knit-campaign-team-stacked-federal-provincial-experience/140492

> or call 613-957-4222.

Thank you

-------------------

Merci d'?crire ? l'honorable Jody Wilson-Raybould, d?put?e de
Vancouver Granville.

Le pr?sent message vise ? vous informer que nous avons re?u votre
courriel. En raison d'une augmentation importante du volume de
correspondance, il pourrait y avoir un retard dans le traitement de
votre courriel. Sachez que votre message sera examin? attentivement.

Pour nous aider ? r?pondre ? vos pr?occupations plus rapidement,
veuillez inclure dans le corps de votre courriel votre nom complet,
votre adresse et votre code postal.

Veuillez prendre note que votre message sera transmis au minist?re de
la Justice s'il porte sur des sujets qui rel?vent du r?le de la
d?put?e en tant que ministre de la Justice et procureure g?n?rale du
Canada. Pour toute correspondance future adress?e ? la ministre de la
Justice, veuillez ?crire directement au minist?re de la Justice ?
mcu@justice.gc.ca ou appelez au 613-957-4222.

Merci



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Warner, Lorri"<Lorri.Warner@justice.gc.ca>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:12:43 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn Madame Mulroney say hey to sneaky
assiant Nabeel and your many Crown Counsels for me will ya?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

I will be away from the office until October 30, 2018.  Please contact
Annette Hartlen at 902-426-7040 or
annette.hartlen@justice.gc.ca<mailto:annette.hartlen@justice.gc.ca> if
you require assistance. Thank you.



---------- Original message ----------
From: ask tvo <asktvo@tvo.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 17:52:43 +0000
Subject: RE: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers
know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the
next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>





Nadine


Customer Relations
Help make the world a better place through the power of learning.Donate today.


Good customer service is important to us at TVO. Please take a moment to let us know whether or not you are satisfied with the level of service provided by our Customer Relations Representative, by completing this survey.



---------- Original  message ----------
From: Caroline Mulroney <caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:53:12 -0800
Subject: Thank you for your message! Re: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the
Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see
become the next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: motomaniac333@gmail.com

Hello,

Thank you for getting in touch with the Caroline Mulroney for Leader
campaign. We’ve heard from hundreds of people like you who are excited
about the change that Caroline will bring to Ontario as the Leader of
the PC Party and the next Premier.

We wanted to let you know that we have received your message and that
we will be in touch shortly to follow up with you.

In the meantime, if you haven’t had the opportunity to get a
membership, please visit carolinemulroney.ca to sign up and vote for
Caroline on March 2nd.

Sincerely,

The Caroline Mulroney for Leader Campaign

--

Caroline Mulroney Campaign
416-922-0573
www.CarolineMulroney.ca


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:58:32 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive
Conservatives" Tim Hudak and Christine Elliott never felt that I was
worth talking to perhaps they should talk to each other about your
pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Bo...
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:53:52 -0400
Subject: FWD Whereas the purported "Progressive Conservatives" Tim Hudak
and Christine Elliott never felt that I was worth talking to perhaps they should talk
to each other about your pals Jenni Byrne, Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney
EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, caroline@carolinemulroney.ca, campaign@tanyagranicallen.com,
 bmulroney <bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, dbutler <dbutler@postmedia.com>,
"blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>,
news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>,
"ht.lacroix"<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, info@ipolitics.ca, "Melanie.Joly"<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, david@policyalternatives.ca,
elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca, KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca, "patrick.brown"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>,
"PETER.MACKAY"<PETER.MACKAY@bakermckenzie.com>,
"Marc.Litt"<Marc.Litt@bakermckenzie.com>, "
Boston.Mail"<Boston.Mail@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>
washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>,

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/tanya-granic-allen-ontario-pc-leadership-1.4538156

Debate proves Tanya Granic Allen will be a factor in Ontario PC leadership race
Allen promises to speak for people who oppose 'the Kathleen Wynne sex-ed agenda'

By Mike Crawley, CBC News Posted: Feb 16, 2018 6:00 AM ET

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lgTsmzbasCA

The CROWN Versus Mean Old Me
140 views
David Amos
Published on Oct 18, 2015

Just Listen or Read

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFOKT6TlSE

Fundy Royal, New Brunswick Debate – Federal Elections 2015 - The Local
Campaign, Rogers TV
5,404 views
Rogers tv
Published on Oct 1, 2015
Federal debate in Fundy Royal, New Brunswick riding featuring
candidates Rob Moore, Stephanie Coburn, Alaina Lockhart, Jennifer
McKenzie and David Amos.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BU3kcK6RdL8

David Amos Federal Court Date is today at 2:00pm at the Federal Building!!!
193 views
Charles Leblanc
Published on May 23, 2017

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLK31BCqepQ&t=142s

Me,Myself and I
42 views
David Amos
Published on Oct 27, 2015

---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 15:54:44 -0400
Subject: Whereas the purported "Progressive Conservatives" Tim Hudak
and Christine Elliott never felt that I was worth talking to perhaps
they should talk to each other about your pals Jenni Byrne, Paul
Godfrey and Derek Burney EH Stevey Boy Harper?
To: tim.hudakco@pc.ola.org, christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org,
premier <premier@ontario.ca>, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
"peter.mackay"<peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca>,
derek.burney@nortonrosefulbright.com, aradwanski@globeandmail.com,
kmcparland@nationalpost.com, ggiorno@fasken.com,
"ht.lacroix"<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, jesse <jesse@jessebrown.ca>,
"paul.dewar.a1"<paul.dewar.a1@parl.gc.ca>,
"Paul.Collister"<Paul.Collister@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"paul.looker"<paul.looker@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
"Paul.Harpelle"<Paul.Harpelle@gnb.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/meet-the-woman-driving-harpers-re-election-campaign/article24699535/

Harper’s enforcer: Meet Jenni Byrne, the most powerful woman in Ottawa
Add to ...
Adam Radwanski The Globe and Mail Published Friday, May 29, 2015 8:00PM EDT

"As Tim Hudak prepared for his second and final shot at becoming
Ontario’s premier, the word went out through Conservative circles in
the nation’s capital: Do not help this man.

Mr. Hudak, then the leader of the provincial Progressive
Conservatives, was a kindred spirit set to run on a right-wing agenda.
He had a decent shot at knocking off a Liberal incumbent with whom
Stephen Harper had a frosty relationship. And after more than a decade
in the political wilderness, his Tories badly needed organizational
support from federal cousins who had recently been in the business of
winning.

Before Mr. Hudak’s first election leading his party, in 2011, such
support was forthcoming. The federal Conservatives lent experienced
campaign managers for target ridings, shared their volunteer lists,
and helped raise money. They even let the provincial Tories use a
campaign bus.

But on the final day of that election campaign, before the votes were
even counted, Mr. Hudak made a bad mistake that went a long way toward
souring his relationship with the federal party: He fired his chief of
staff, Lynette Corbett.

Mixed views about whether Ms. Corbett deserved to be let go, after a
behind-the-scenes power struggle among Mr. Hudak’s senior officials,
are beside the point.

What matters is that she’s among the very best friends of Jenni Byrne.

There are only a few backroom operators in this country whose bad side
needs to be avoided at all costs. And Ms. Byrne – the Prime Minister’s
campaign manager, his enforcer, his primary connection to his party’s
grassroots, and one of his longest-serving loyalists – is most
emphatically one of them.

“Pretty much from the day Lynette was fired, we couldn’t get a phone
call returned,” recalls a senior member of Mr. Hudak’s campaign team.
“It pretty quickly became clear this wasn’t an issue to be managed. It
was a fact to be accepted.”

Never mind central support; all but the bravest federal Conservatives
were reluctant even to be seen at a Hudak fundraiser, for fear of what
it would do to their careers.

It is unclear whether Mr. Harper was fully aware that his party was
choking off resources to Mr. Hudak; if he was, he didn’t much care.
Such is the leeway afforded to the woman who claimed credit for
steering the Prime Minister to majority government, and whom he will
be counting on to help him hold on to it in this year’s federal
campaign."


----- Original Message -----
From: BARRY WINTERS <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 14:17:21 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: Re: Attn Christine Elliott as soon as I saw that Paul Godfrey and
Derek Burney were behind the lawyer Patrick Brown I understood the game
Did You?
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>,
annette boucher <annette.boucher@novascotia.ca>, boucheam@gov.ns.ca,
Dana doiron <Dana.doiron@novascotia.ca>, blake@frankmagazine.ca,
comment@contrarian.ca, HANSENCE@gov.ns.ca,
Parker Donham <parker@donham.ca>, mail@trinetraproductions.com,
Glen Canning <grcanning@gmail.com>, Glen Muise <glenmuise1000@gmail.com>,
obsceneworks@gmail.com, gord@gordgamble.com, greenhkh@gov.ns.ca,
"jim.david"<jim.david@pcparty.ns.ca>, Legc office
<Legc.office@novascotia.ca>, Neil Ferguson
<Neil.Ferguson@novascotia.ca>

To all addressees. Please be advised David Amos is a wanted sex
offender with outstanding warrants in the United States


On 5/13/15, Elliott-co, Christine < christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org> wrote:


---------- Original message ----------
From: "Elliott-co, Christine"<christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org>
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 17:00:31 +0000
Subject: RE: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about Commissioner Joe Friday
and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on April 28th
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Mr. Amos.  I am writing to acknowledge receipt of the 2 emails that
you have forwarded to Ms. Elliott's office.  I will bring them to her
attention at the earliest opportunity.

Constituency Staff
Office of Christine Elliott
MPP, Whitby-Oshawa


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos < motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:31 AM
Subject: Attn Christine Elliott as soon as I saw that Paul Godfrey and Derek Burney
were behind the lawyer Patrick Brown I understood the game Did You?
To: christine.elliottco@pc.ola.org , christine@christineelliott.ca ,
derek.burney@nortonrosefulbright.com , christina.blizzard@sunmedia.ca
, premier < premier@ontario.ca>, pm < pm@pm.gc.ca>,
premier < premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier < premier@gnb.ca>,
 PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, premier < premier@gov.bc.ca>,
 premier < premier@leg.gov.mb.ca>, premier < premier@gov.pe.ca>,
 premier < premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier < premier@gov.nl.ca>
Cc: David Amos < david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

FYI I just got off the phone with Brown's office in Ottawa on his last
day as an MP and his staff rememberd me.

http://www.christineelliott.ca/meet_christine

My big question to you is do you even remember me?

Here is a clue

http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/harper-and-bankers.html

-----Original Message-----
From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 9:32 AM
To: Elliott-co, Christine; christine@christineelliott.ca;
derek.burney@nortonrosefulbright.com; christina.blizzard@sunmedia.ca;
premier; pm; premier; premier; PREMIER; premier; premier; premier;
premier; premier
Cc: David Amos
Subject: Fwd: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about Commissioner
Joe Friday and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on April 28th


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2015 17:22:09 -0400
Subject: RE I just called Pat Martin and Brad Butt about Commissioner
Joe Friday and his testimony before the OGGO Committee on April 28th
To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Lampron.Raynald@psic-ispc.gc.ca,
Friday.Joe@psic-ispc.gc.ca, lachapelle.edith@psic-ispc.gc.ca,
brad.butt@parl.gc.ca, pat.martin@parl.gc.ca, OGGO@parl.gc.ca,
manon.hardy@chrc-ccdp.ca, "Gilles.Moreau"<Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>,
 "Gilles.Blinn"<Gilles.Blinn@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
"David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "Stephen.Horsman"<Stephen.Horsman@gnb.ca>

http://parlvu.parl.gc.ca/PARLVU/ContentEntityDetailView.aspx?contententityid=12872&date=20150401&lang=en


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/tanya-granic-allen-ontario-pc-leadership-1.4538156


---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Première ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:49:57 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the
Mulroney lawyers know why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like
to see become the next PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>


Thanks for your email. I value your input and appreciate your taking
the time to get in touch with me.

Every email and letter I receive is carefully read and reviewed. Given
the volume of emails and letters I receive, and because I may need to
share your message with one of my Cabinet ministers or the appropriate
government officials for more information, a response may take several
business days.

Thanks again for contacting me.

Kathleen Wynne
Premier


Please note that we are not able to receive replies at this email
address, so please do not respond directly to this email.

* * *

Je vous remercie de votre courriel. Votre avis est important pour moi
et je vous suis reconnaissante d’avoir pris le temps de m’écrire.

Toutes les lettres et tous les courriels que je reçois sont lus
attentivement, un par un. Sachez, cependant, qu’en raison du volume
important de correspondance que je reçois et parce qu’il se peut que
j’aie à consulter l’un de mes collègues du Conseil des ministres ou un
fonctionnaire compétent en la matière, il pourrait s’écouler plusieurs
jours avant que je puisse donner suite à votre courriel.

Meilleures salutations,

Kathleen Wynne
Première ministre de l’Ontario

Veuillez ne pas répondre directement à ce courriel, car aucun courriel
ne peut être reçu à cette adresse.


---------- Original  message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 09:26:57 -0400
Subject: Trust that TVO, Billy Morneau and the Mulroney lawyers know
why Tanya Granic Allen is the Lady I would like to see become the next
PC leader and everybody know I am NOT religious
To: asktvo@tvo.org, caroline@carolinemulroney.ca, campaign@tanyagranicallen.com,
 bmulroney <bmulroney@ogilvyrenault.com>, dbutler <dbutler@postmedia.com>,
"Dominic.Cardy"<Dominic.Cardy@gnb.ca>, "blaine.higgs"<blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>,
 news <news@kingscorecord.com>, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>,
andre <andre@jafaust.com>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>,
"ht.lacroix"<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>, "sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>, "Melanie.Joly"<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>, david@policyalternatives.ca,
info@ipolitics.ca, elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca, KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca,
StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca, "patrick.brown"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "martine.turcotte"<martine.turcotte@bell.ca>, "steve.murphy"<steve.murphy@ctv.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>, "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>

https://tvo.org/current-affairs

https://expertfile.com/experts/lisa.dewilde

Lisa de Wilde, C.M.
Chief Executive Officer

As a well-known Canadian media executive, Lisa de Wilde is a leader of
innovation and transformative change. An advocate of leveraging
digital technology to create moments of learning for people of all
ages, as Chief Executive Officer since 2005 Lisa has steered TVO’s
transformation into Ontario’s digital learning organization.

Prior to leading TVO, Lisa was President and CEO of Astral Television,
and has also been legal counsel for the Canadian Radio-Television and
Telecommunications Commission (CRTC). Lisa also serves the community
in volunteer roles on the Board of Directors of Toronto Global, the
Strategic Advisory Group for the Ontario Institute for Studies in
Education (OISE), the Advisory Board for the Mowat Centre, and
previously with the Board of Directors of the Toronto International
Film Festival (TIFF), which she chaired from 2013-2016. She is
currently on the Boards of Directors of TELUS and Enercare Inc.

Lisa is a member of the Order of Canada, a recipient of the Queen’s
Diamond Jubilee Medal, has received honourary degrees from Ryerson
University and Brandon University, and was recognized with the WXN
Canada’s Most Powerful Women: Top 100 Award. She holds Bachelors of
Arts and of Laws degrees from McGill University, and is a member of
the Law Society of Upper Canada.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/steve-paikin-tvo-third-party-sexual-harassment-1.4520028


TVO launches 3rd-party investigation into Steve Paikin over sexual
harassment allegations
Allegations date back to 2010 lunch
CBC News Posted: Feb 05, 2018 10:36 AM ET

The Ontario PC Leadership Debate
2,476 views
The Agenda with Steve Paikin
Published on Feb 15, 2018
The Ontario PC leadership is up for grabs. The Agenda welcomes the
candidates to debate the issue

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThzTrGqENHA

Tanya Granic Allen Campaign
PO Box 40514, RPO Six Points Plaza
Etobicoke, ON M9B 6K8
Media Contact
Phone 905-459-0082
Email
campaign@tanyagranicallen.com



---------- Original message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 21:07:13 +0000
Subject: RE: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:06:59 -0400
Subject: Has TVO figured out who I am yet?
To: asktvo@tvo.org, premier <premier@ontario.ca>, "Bill.Morneau"
<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, "ht.lacroix"<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>,
"Melanie.Joly"<Melanie.Joly@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:21:57 -0400
Subject: Please forward this email to Peter Bleyer and David Macdonald
for me will ya?
To: ccpasask@sasktel.net, christine@policyalternatives.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>

Simon Enoch, Director
CCPA Saskatchewan
2nd Floor, 2138 McIntyre Street
Regina, SK S4P 2R7

Telephone: 306-924-3372
Fax: 306-586-5177
Email: ccpasask@sasktel.net

For media inquiries, please contact Christine Saulnier, Director,
(902) 240-0926 or christine@policyalternatives.ca.

PO Box 8355
Halifax, NS B3K 5M1
Email: ccpans@policyalternatives.ca
Telephone: (902) 240-0926


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2018 18:22:21 -0400
Subject: Yo Bill Morneau before Trump causes the markets to crash Methinks I should remind
folks of the Bank of Canadas long lost mandate, Harper's Bankster bail out 10 years ago and
Trudeau The Younger's recent Bankster Bail-In plan
To: "Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>,
 "Andrew.Bailey"<Andrew.Bailey@fca.org.uk>, postur <postur@for.is>,
postur <postur@dmr.is>, postur <postur@irr.is>, smari <smari@immi.is>,
david@policyalternatives.ca, info@ipolitics.ca, elizabeth.thompson@cbc.ca, michaelharris@ipolitics.ca, KadyOMalley@ipolitics.ca, StephenMaher@ipolitics.ca,
info@canadachristiancollege.com, "zach.dubinsky"<zach.dubinsky@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
 press <press@bankofengland.co.uk>,
 "boris.johnson.mp"<boris.johnson.mp@parliament.uk>,
"herb.wiseman"<herb.wiseman@gmail.com>, paul.slansky@bellnet.ca,
stuart@policyalternatives.ca, ccpa@policyalternatives.ca, steve.silva@globalnews.ca, steve@stevesilva.ca, "David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>

Whereas nobody listens to me I will attempt to do so byway of other
people's words and videos.

Does anyone recall this nonsense on Youtube 5 years ago when young
Justin was charging big bucks for speeches but having fun yapping it
up bigtime in malls for free? Obviously even bald mall guards loved
Trudeau "The Younger" back then Nesy Pas?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTUyIDRIAXo

Justin Trudeau: Fluoride/Bilderberg/Bank of Canada Are Conspiracy Theories
Terry Wilson
Published on Feb 8, 2013


However this far important stuff was also put up on YouTube after it
appears CBC had aired it first and nobody seemed to care.

Please note I truly do appreciate David MacDonald's work. However I am
very tired of his old buddies such as the turncoat NDP?Conservative
Dominic Cardy laughing at me while sending me butter tarts and talking
mindlessly of ardvarrks, puffins and pussy cats etc.

Study Reveals Secret Bailouts to Canadian Banks
31,067 views

LeakSourceCanada
Published on Apr 30, 2012
04/30/2012

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9K_N0uOXkQA&t=69s

"Our politicians are on the global stage touting the soundness of
Canada's banking system, where at the same time three of Canada's
banks were at some point underwater."

David Macdonald of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
explains the think tank's report that found Canadian banks received
secret bailouts during the 2008-2010 financial crisis.

(PDF) The Big Banks' Big Secret: Estimating Government Support for
Canadian Banks During the Financial Crisis
http://www.policyalternatives.ca/site...

http://LeakSource.wordpress.com


Need I say that I contacted these NDP/union/beancounter/spindoctors long ago?

https://www.policyalternatives.ca/authors/david-macdonald

https://www.policyalternatives.ca/newsroom/news-releases/record-breaking-ceo-pay-now-209-times-more-average-worker

“Canada’s corporate executives were among the loudest critics of a new
fifteen dollar minimum wage in provinces like Ontario and Alberta,
meanwhile the highest paid among them were raking in record-breaking
earnings,” says the report’s author, CCPA Senior Economist David
Macdonald."

Climbing Up and Kicking Down: Executive pay in Canada is available on
the CCPA website. For more information contact Alyssa O’Dell, CCPA
Media and Public Relations: 613-563-1341 x307,
alyssa@policyalternatives.ca or cell 343-998-7575.

Here is a little proof of an email of mine from 2012 that the CCPA,
the NDP, the Conservatives, Dizzy Lizzy May, Trudeau "The Younger",
his many mindless minions and even YOU should recall N'esy Pas David
Akin?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:09:54 -0400
Subject: Fwd: RE Potash Corp, The NEB, Nexen, Pipelines and MP Nathan Cullen
To: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca, "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>, "marc.garneau.a1"<marc.garneau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, "dean.delmastro.c1"
<dean.delmastro.c1@parl.gc.ca>, leader <leader@greenparty.ca>, leader
<leader@greenparty.bc.ca>, "adrian.dix.mla"<adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca>

That said

Does anyone remember what this crooked Bankster had to say to CBC the
following year before he split for a far fancier job in Not So Merry
Old England???

Bank 'bail-in' plan shouldn't worry Canadians, Carney says
Bank of Canada head says it's 'hard to fathom' Canadian deposits would
be touched
The Canadian Press Posted: Apr 18, 2013 5:03 PM ET

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/bank-bail-in-plan-shouldn-t-worry-canadians-carney-says-1.1320808

Since then the Liebranos put the Bankster 'bail-in' plan in the books.
While CBC has played dumb lawyers and many others have had an opinion
about it. I for one  particularly enjoy the ones I view on YouTube.

So who is the liar of these two? an unnamed lawyer on the CBA website
who does not offer a name to back up its opinion or a biblepounder
that claims to be a "Dr" or both?

FAQ: What is a “bail-in regime” and are my bank deposits safe?

https://cba.ca/faq-what-is-a-bail-in-regime


Trudeau's Bail-In Now Law to Allow Banks to Confiscate Your Deposits
23,777 views
Canadian Times NEWS
Published on Aug 11, 2016

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvZ5S-Jt6sw

Perhaps both the lawyer and the "Dr" may enjoy the email found within this blog
 I published today for their benefit

Sunday, 21 January 2018

As soon as Mark Carney is appointed Govenor of the Bank of England I
get a call from the SEC (202 551 2000)

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/01/as-soon-as-mark-carney-is-appointed.html



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "MinFinance / FinanceMin (FIN)"<fin.minfinance-financemin.fin@canada.ca>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 21:51:00 +0000
Subject: RE: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and Jack Gibbons
characters and what they opt to publish while I was at the NBEUB hearing yesterday and
yet they think i am not worth talking to just like the lawyers do?
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

The Department of Finance acknowledges receipt of your electronic
correspondence. Please be assured that we appreciate receiving your
comments.

Le ministère des Finances accuse réception de votre correspondance
électronique. Soyez assuré(e) que nous apprécions recevoir vos
commentaires.


---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 17:29:05 -0400
Subject: Unbelieveable I actually agree with these Doug Draper and Jack Gibbons characters
and what they opt to publish while I was at the NBEUB hearing yesterday and yet they think
i am not worth talking to just like the lawyers do?
To: jack@cleanairalliance.org, drapers@vaxxine.com, premier@ontario.ca,
doug <doug@fordnation.ca>, christine@christine2018.ca, info@fordforleader.ca,
ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca, Angela@cleanairalliance.org, rsvp@jakeskinner.ca, media@christine2018.ca, newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, leblanc.daniel.m@gmail.com,
Dave.Young@nbeub.ca, twoolf@synapse-energy.com, rzarumba@ceadvisors.com, rdk@indecon.com, efinamore@valutechsolutions.com, patrick.brown@pc.ola.org,
"Bill.Morneau"<Bill.Morneau@canada.ca>, paul.heroux@mcgill.ca, chris_r_31@hotmail.com, wharrison <wharrison@nbpower.com>, cstewart@stewartmckelvey.com
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
 "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>, "rick.doucet"<rick.doucet@gnb.ca>,
 ecdesmond <ecdesmond@nbeub.ca>, "Furey, John"<jfurey@nbpower.com>,
sstoll <sstoll@airdberlis.com>, hsegal <hsegal@airdberlis.com>,
 jtodd <jtodd@elenchus.ca>, ddale <ddale@thestar.ca>,
"darrow.macintyre"<darrow.macintyre@cbc.ca>

Go Figure EH Dougy Ford?

http://www.nbeub.ca/opt/M/browserecord.php?-action=browse&-recid=560

Matter No. 0375

Title NB  Power  2018-2019  General  Rate  Application  /  Énergie  NB
 Demande  générale  de  tarifs  pour  2018-2019

Description Electricity

Summary         IN  THE  MATTER  OF  an  application  by  New  Brunswick
Power  Corporation  for  approval  of  the  schedules  of  the  rates
for  the  fiscal  year  commencing  April  1,  2018.

Status Open

https://niagaraatlarge.com/2018/02/13/when-will-the-light-come-on/

When Will The Light Come On?
Posted on February 13, 2018 by dougdraper | 2 Comments
Urge Ontario’s Party Leaders To Embrace a ‘Real Solution’ to Rising
Electricity Costs

A Call-Out from the Ontario Clean Air Alliance, a citizens advocacy
group in the province

Posted February 13th, 2018 on Niagara At Large

We are now just a few months away from a provincial election and we
know that rising electricity costs are sure to be a big issue on the
campaign trail. So why have none of the parties at Queen’s Park
embraced the real solution to lowering bills – buying power from
Quebec?

Quebec just signed a deal with Massachusetts to supply power at 3 to
5.5 cents per kWh. That’s less than one-third of the projected cost of
power from rebuilt reactors at the Darlington Nuclear Station. Yet our
leaders seem more interested in accounting tricks and finger pointing
than in grabbing Quebec’s sensational offer to make a similar deal
with Ontario.

Right now, all our leaders (and leadership candidates) seem to be
stumbling around in the dark on the electricity issue (with the
exception of the Green Party, which has called for a deal with
Quebec). To make a real difference for voters, they need to quickly
flip the switch from dangerous high cost nuclear to clean affordable
power from Quebec. Voters have had enough of non-solutions and the
blame game. Now it is time for real answers.

Please tell the leaders and leadership candidates that you want
answers, not empty promises.

    Premier Kathleen Wynne: premier@ontario.ca
    NDP Leader Andrea Horwath: ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca
    PC Leadership candidate Christine Elliott: christine@christine2018.ca
    PC Leadership candidate Doug Ford: info@fordforleader.ca
    PC Leadership candidate Caroline Mulroney: christine@christine2018.ca

Thank you, Angela Bischoff, Director

P.S. We have sent the PC leadership candidates the following question:
“Should the Government of Ontario seek to negotiate a long-term
electricity supply contract with Hydro Quebec to lower our electricity
rates?” We’ll let you know what they have to say. Stay tuned.

Share this with your social media networks:

NIAGARA AT LARGE encourages you to join the conversation by sharing
your views on this post in the space below the Bernie quote.

A reminder that we only post comments by individuals who also share
their first and last names.

For more news and commentary from Niagara At Large – an independent,
alternative voice for our greater bi-national Niagara region – become
a regular visitor and subscriber to NAL at www.niagaraatlarge.com .

 “A politician thinks of the next election. A leader thinks of the
next generation.” – Bernie Sanders

Jack Gibbons, Chair
Former Toronto Hydro Commissioner
(416) 260-2080,  ext. 2
jack@cleanairalliance.org

Doug Draper
(905) 227-7951
32 Collier Rd N Thorold ON L2V 2X1




---------- Original message ----------
From: "Brown, Patrick"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 19:47:56 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just
called from 902 800 0369
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Thank you very much for getting in touch. Due to the large volume of
mail that I receive, please allow time for a response. If it is a
pressing issue, please call my Queen’s Park office at 416-325-3855.
Otherwise, I will respond as soon as possible.

Regards,

Patrick Brown, MPP
Simcoe North
Leader of the Official Opposition



---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:22:57 -0400
Subject: Attn David Butt and Matthew Garrow I just called from 902 800 0369
To: dbutt@barristersatlaw.ca, matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca,
"sylvie.gadoury"<sylvie.gadoury@radio-canada.ca>,  "ht.lacroix"<ht.lacroix@cbc.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>,
"David.Akin"<David.Akin@globalnews.ca>,
"patrick.brown"<patrick.brown@pc.ola.org>

Interesting news to say the least EH David Akin?


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/patrick-brown-blasts-ctv-news-1.4535358


'You lied. You defamed me': Patrick Brown blasts CTV News after sexual
misconduct accuser changes timeline
One of Brown's accusers now says she was wasn't underage at time of
alleged sexual misconduct
Amara McLaughlin · CBC News · Posted: Feb 14, 2018 2:45 PM ET |

"CTV 'stands by its reporting': spokesperson

Matthew Garrow, spokesperson for Bell Media, also responded to Brown's
Facebook post on Wednesday in an email to CBC News.

"CTV News continues to stand by its reporting," Garrow said.

"Patrick Brown's allegations regarding our reporting are false. As we
reported once again last night, the two women have reiterated their
allegations of sexual misconduct by Patrick Brown."


Matthew Garrow, Bell Media, 416-384-5258 or matthew.garrow@bellmedia.ca;

Mr Butt here is where I published the email I sent you last year

http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2018/02/oh-my-my-little-lawyer-patrick-brown.html


There rest of this email should bring you up to date

>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 02:23:24 -0300
>> Subject: ATTN FBI Special Agent Richard Deslauriers Have you talked to
>> your buddies Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly about the wiretap tapes YET?
>> To: boston@ic.fbi.gov, washington.field@ic.fbi.gov,
>> bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Kevin.leahy@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov, Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov,
>> jcarney@carneybassil.com, bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, birgittaj@althingi.is,
>> shmurphy@globe.com, redicecreations@gmail.com
>>
>> FBI Boston
>> One Center Plaza
>> Suite 600
>> Boston, MA 02108
>> Phone: (617) 742-5533
>> Fax: (617) 223-6327
>> E-mail: Boston@ic.fbi.gov
>>
>> Hours
>> Although we operate 24 hours a day, seven days a week, our normal
>> "walk-in" business hours are from 8:15 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday
>> through Friday. If you need to speak with a FBI representative at any
>> time other than during normal business hours, please telephone our
>> office at (617) 742-5533.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 01:20:20 -0300
>> Subject: Yo Fred Wyshak and Brian Kelly your buddy Whitey's trial is
>> finally underway now correct? What the hell do I do with the wiretap
>> tapes Sell them on Ebay?
>> To: Brian.Kelly@usdoj.gov, us.marshals@usdoj.gov,
>> Fred.Wyshak@usdoj.gov, jcarney@carneybassil.com,
>> bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net, wolfheartlodge@live.com, shmurphy@globe.com, >> jonathan.albano@bingham.com,  mvalencia@globe.com
>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> PATRICK.MURPHY@dhs.gov, rounappletree@aol.com
>>
>> http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/06/05/james-whitey-bulger-jury-selection-process-enters-second-day/KjS80ofyMMM5IkByK74bkK/story.html
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/story/2013/06/09/nsa-leak-guardian.html
>>
>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I must ask
>> them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING SOMETHING????
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vugUalUO8YY
>>
>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served upon the
>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament baseball
>> cards?
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/FedsUsTreasuryDeptRcmpEtc
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006
>>
>> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/2006/05/wiretap-tapes-impeach-bush.html
>>
>> http://www.archive.org/details/PoliceSurveilanceWiretapTape139
>>
>> http://archive.org/details/Part1WiretapTape143
>>
>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006
>> Senator Arlen Specter
>> United States Senate
>> Committee on the Judiciary
>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building
>> Washington, DC 20510
>>
>> Dear Mr. Specter:
>>
>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a man
>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the matters
>> raised in the attached letter.
>>
>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire tap tapes.
>>
>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this previously.
>>
>> Very truly yours,
>> Barry A. Bachrach
>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403
>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003
>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "David Amos"david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>> To: "Rob Talach"rtalach@ledroitbeckett.com
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 10:59 PM
>> Subject: Re: Attn Robert Talach and I should talk ASAP about my suing
>> the Catholic Church Trust that Bastarache knows why
>>
>> The date stamp on about page 134 of this old file of mine should mean
>> a lot to you
>>
>> http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/2619437-CROSS-BORDER-txt-.pdf
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:37:08 -0400
>> Subject: To Hell with the KILLER COP Gilles Moreau What say you NOW
>> Bernadine Chapman??
>> To: Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, phil.giles@statcan.ca,
>> maritme_malaise@yahoo.ca, Jennifer.Nixon@ps-sp.gc.ca,
>> bartman.heidi@psic-ispc.gc.ca, Yves.J.Marineau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
>> david.paradiso@erc-cee.gc.ca, desaulniea@smtp.gc.ca,
>> denise.brennan@tbs-sct.gc.ca, anne.murtha@vac-acc.gc.ca,
>> webo@xplornet.com, julie.dickson@osfi-bsif.gc.ca,
>> rod.giles@osfi-bsif.gc.ca, flaherty.j@parl.gc.ca, toewsv1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Nycole.Turmel@parl.gc.ca,Clemet1@parl.gc.ca, maritime_malaise@yahoo.ca, >> oig@sec.gov, whistleblower@finra.org, whistle@fsa.gov.uk,
>> david@fairwhistleblower.ca
>> Cc: j.kroes@interpol.int, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
>> bernadine.chapman@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,  justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca,
>> Juanita.Peddle@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, oldmaison@yahoo.com,
>> Wayne.Lang@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, Robert.Trevors@gnb.ca,
>> ian.fahie@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>
>>
>> http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/nb/news-nouvelles/media-medias-eng.htm
>>
>> http://nb.rcmpvet.ca/Newsletters/VetsReview/nlnov06.pdf
>>
>> From: Gilles Moreau Gilles.Moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 08:03:22 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Lets ee if the really nasty Newfy Lawyer Danny Boy
>> Millions will explain this email to you or your boss Vic Toews EH
>> Constable Peddle???
>> To: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
>>
>> Please cease and desist from using my name in your emails.
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, Chief Superintendent, CHRP and ACC
>> Director General
>> HR Transformation
>> 73 Leikin Drive, M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R2
>>
>> Tel 613-843-6039
>> Cel 613-818-6947
>>
>> Gilles Moreau, surintendant principal, CRHA et ACC
>> Directeur général de la Transformation des ressources humaines
>> 73 Leikin, pièce M5-2-502
>> Ottawa, ON K1A 0R2
>>
>> tél 613-843-6039
>> cel 613-818-6947
>> gilles.moreau@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>>


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2018 09:36:42 -0400
Subject: Yo Norman.Sabourin Need I say that the noname assistant of your buddy
Chief Justice David D. Smith just pissed of the wrong Maritimer today?
To: "Norman.Sabourin"<Norman.Sabourin@cjc-ccm.gc.ca>, david.d.smith@gnb.ca, "denis.landry2"<denis.landry2@gnb.ca>, Brian.Gallant@gnb.ca,
 "serge.rousselle"<serge.rousselle@gnb.ca>, "David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, "hugh.flemming"<hugh.flemming@gnb.ca>, "david.eidt"<david.eidt@gnb.ca>,
caroline.lafontaine@gnb.ca, crystal.critch@gnb.ca
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, george.filliter@gnb.ca,
michael.bray@fosterandcompany.com, "Jacques.Poitras"<Jacques.Poitras@cbc.ca>, "Larry.Tremblay"<Larry.Tremblay@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/chief-justice-retirement-1.4515502


New Brunswick chief justice announces retirement
J. Ernest Drapeau was appointed to the office in 2003
CBC News Posted: Feb 01, 2018 5:32 PM AT

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/david-smith-george-rideout-judge-transfer-letter-1.4515986

Sitting judge calls on chief justice to resign for defying transfer law
Chief Justice David Smith transferred a judge in December in a
challenge of new Judicature Act changes
By Jacques Poitras, CBC News Posted: Feb 02, 2018 4:00 AM AT

The Hon. George S. Rideout
Justice:
Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick
Moncton
Judges Chambers
145 Assumption Blvd.,
PO Box 5001, Stn. LCD 1
Moncton, New Brunswick E1C 8R3
Phone: 506-856-2301

Bell, Drapeau and Smith should have done the right thing LONG AGO


https://www.cjc-ccm.gc.ca/english/about_en.asp?selMenu=about_members_en.asp

New Brunswick
The Honourable Ernest Drapeau, Chief Justice of New Brunswick
The Honourable David D. Smith, Chief Justice of the Court of Queen's
Bench of New Brunswick

Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada
The Honourable B. Richard Bell, Chief Justice of the Court Martial
Appeal Court of Canada

Need I remind the Justice Dept that I am about to make an application to
the Supreme Court because of this wicked decision?  Please enjoy


http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/11/federal-court-of-appeal-finally-makes.html

Sunday, 19 November 2017

Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And Publishes
It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter Before
The Supreme Court

https://decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/236679/index.do


Federal Court of Appeal Decisions

Amos v. Canada
Court (s) Database

Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date

2017-10-30
Neutral citation

2017 FCA 213
File numbers

A-48-16
Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017.
Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY:

THE COURT



Date: 20171030

Docket: A-48-16
Citation: 2017 FCA 213
CORAM:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.


BETWEEN:
DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
Respondent on the cross-appeal
(and formally Appellant)
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Appellant on the cross-appeal
(and formerly Respondent)
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT

I.                    Introduction

[1]               On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. Amos)
filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court
against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 million
in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and Provincial
Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary
properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public Safety
that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal Canadian
Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his clan
(Claim at para. 96).

[2]               On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by way of a
motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court (the
Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to
amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally vexatious,
and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment (the
Prothontary’s Order).


[3]               On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of Mr.
Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the Federal
Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of Mr.
Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for damages
for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature in
2004 (the Federal Court Judgment).


[4]               Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed the
Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of Status
Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, 2016.
As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s
cross-appeal.


II.                 Preliminary Matter

[5]               Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in
relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on March
6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including two of
the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this appeal.
This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he believed
had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with this
Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with
several judges but did not name those judges.

[6]               Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have to
identify the judges in any document filed with this Court because he
had identified the judges in various documents that had been filed
with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the Federal
Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document filed in
the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is based on
subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., 1985,
c. F-7:


5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or her
office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court of
Appeal.
[…]

5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la Cour
d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que
les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale.
[…]
5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue of
that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the
jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal Court.

5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges de la
Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs que les
juges de la Cour fédérale.


[7]               However, these subsections only provide that the
judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and vice
versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the Federal
Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for this
section.
[8]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act provide that:
3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of
Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is
continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and
for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada and as
a superior court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour d’appel
fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en
français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est maintenue
à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté du
Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et
continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence en
matière civile et pénale.
4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal Court
— Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in
English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an
additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, for
the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a superior
court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction.

4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section de
première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée «
Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. Elle est
maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et
d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit
canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant
compétence en matière civile et pénale.


[9]               Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act create
two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal Court
(section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the Federal
Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there would no
need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as required by
Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in relation
to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The requirement to
file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal from a
decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only documents
that will be before this Court are the documents that are part of that
appeal book.


[10]           Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed on
March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in which
Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a
conflict in any matter related to him.


[11]           On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a motion
before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying the
conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the Federal
Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting that if
Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the Federal
Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this
cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before this
Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal Court
will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion brought
before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents filed in
relation to that motion are not part of the record of this Court.


[12]           During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged that
the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest and
submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim of a
conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was also
afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the conflict
that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in his
view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several pages of
documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the
documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the particular
judge and then, immediately following that biography, by including
copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim that
such judge had a conflict.


[13]           The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice Webb is
that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of Canada in
2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and before
that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted that he
had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law and
therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a partner
of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was
personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in which Mr.
Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only that he
was a member of such firm.


[14]           During his oral submissions at the hearing of his
appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice Webb,
focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at
Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. Amos at
the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this
particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with this
lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such dealings were
after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the Tax
Court of Canada over 10 years ago.


[15]           The documents that he submitted in relation to the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings between
Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office of
Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where Justice Webb
practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing between
Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of Stephen May
who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson Palmer. The
affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of e-mails
that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also included a
letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is John
Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson
Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed to
“John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street,
Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a
possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer.
[16]           Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice Webb
was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In Wewaykum
Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 S.C.R.
259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of a
judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable
apprehension of bias:
60        In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the
criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by de
Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National Energy
Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is the
reasonable apprehension of bias:
… the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by
reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the
question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the words
of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed person,
viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having thought
the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more likely
than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or
unconsciously, would not decide fairly."

[17]           The issue to be determined is whether an informed
person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and having
thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ allegations
give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court has
previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges will
administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be
rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias (Collins v.
Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. See
also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 D.L.R.
(4th) 193).

[18]           The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. v.
Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the Supreme
Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the
particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing a
case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was
involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The Ontario
Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified if the
judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he was a
lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the rules for
determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from the
rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict:
27        Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to a
finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case over
which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no involvement,
as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified.


28        The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson been
asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his appointment to
the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him from
taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of the
defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a trial
judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered by the
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. Bayfield
Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, that
there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a judge
and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances."


29        It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be an
inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the
different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of
judicial impartiality that applies in the context of disqualification
of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations of
conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's previous
involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by Sopinka J.
in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 (S.C.C.),
for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a disqualifying
interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a conclusory
statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential
information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is the
opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial judge.
His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case and
had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face value
unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. 19.


30        That brings me then to consider the particular circumstances
of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a
disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, there are
two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision not to
recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties accept,
that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm and
that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long passage of
time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85:
            To us, one significant factor stands out, and must inform
the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of this
involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That factor is
the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on
circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the decision-making,
or that occurred within a short time prior to the decision-making.
31        There are other factors that inform the issue. The Wilson
Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time of
trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. had
been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship with
his former firm for a considerable period of time.


32        In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter
realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal fairly
and impartially with this case. I take this view principally because
of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of involvement
in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had carriage.
In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that the
trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere fact that
his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from over a
decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he would
either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's former
client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would throw
off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and favour a
client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six years
earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case involving
events from over a decade ago.
(emphasis added)

[19]           Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter
involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or
Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos made it
clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for the
alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of
Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough for
Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos with
Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would have
had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when he
was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any
involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos had
with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself is
sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since
Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer would
also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in Justice
Webb hearing this appeal.

[20]           Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. R.
(2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no
reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a member of
the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no involvement
with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm.

[21]           In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, [2000] 4
F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a
reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was a
lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person who
was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished as
Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files involving Mr.
Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson Law.

[22]           Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. He
stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a “true copy
of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this CD.
He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the CD
entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement authorities
and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are willing
to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an “American
police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American law
enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, a
conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy.

[23]           As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable
apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason for him
to recuse himself.

[24]           Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past professional
experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in deciding
the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near
confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged in the
Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself.

[25]           Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for Mr.
Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he alleges
that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he wrote
a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that time,
both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law firm
Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and angry,
begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me suing
you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the letter
was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by Mr.
Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no reason
for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question does
not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.


III.               Issue

[26]           The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did the
Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the Claim
in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that Mr.
Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick
legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action?

IV.              Analysis

A.                 Standard of Review

[27]           Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of review to
be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and decisions
made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in Hospira
Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA 215,
402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel of
this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that
articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235
[Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the Federal
Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made by a
prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of the
case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal if
the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and overriding
error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and
law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only interfere with
a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary order
if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding error in
determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law
(Hospira at paras. 82-83).

[28]           In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own
assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This Court
must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the Judge
erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing to
interfere.


B.                 Did the Judge err in interfering with the
Prothonotary’s Order?

[29]           The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following
paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for striking the
Claim in its entirety without leave to amend:

17.       Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff
addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but four
of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred in 2006
in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction of
the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in right of
the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the Province
or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident alleged
does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this Court.
(…)


21.       The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant
provide no details as to the individuals involved or the location of
the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the
Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible to
determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to advance.
A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the Defendant to
only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. At
best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he
suspects he is barred from the House of Commons.
[footnotes omitted].


[30]           The Judge determined that he could not strike the Claim
on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge noted
that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the
liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the actors
who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004
included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In considering
the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified
paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it
identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as
Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment at
para. 27).


[31]           The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support a
cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and
identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. Canada,
2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111:


[13]      As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, 2003 SCC
69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must
determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each
element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office:

a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and unlawful
conduct in his or her capacity as public officer;

b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her
conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the plaintiff; and

c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the public
officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude that a
public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly.
Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28
(Federal Court Judgment at para. 28).

[32]           The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed sufficient
material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance in
public office because the actors, who barred him from the New
Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for
“political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29).

[33]           This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of pleadings
in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, 321
D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt:

…When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to
assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or
negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did steal”.
“The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is called
upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making bald,
conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an abuse
of process…

To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public office
requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in carrying
out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the public
officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or her
office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is
mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of
allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of mind of
a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.”
(at paras. 34-35, citations omitted).

[34]           Applying the Housen standard of review to the
Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge interfered
absent a legal or palpable and overriding error.

[35]           The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim
disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on the
basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material facts to
ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which addresses
the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP officer
engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her
conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in bad
faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was barred from
the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious reasons,
these allegations are not particularized and are directed against
non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Legislative
Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As such,
the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that the RCMP
barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was capable of
supporting a cause of action.

[36]           In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of bare
allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no
reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the Federal
Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside the
Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. Further, we
find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to amend.
The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such that
amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26).

V.                 Conclusion
[37]           For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the Crown’s
cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court Judgment,
dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, dated
November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety
without leave to amend.
"Wyman W. Webb"
J.A.
"David G. Near"
J.A.
"Mary J.L. Gleason"
J.A.



FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD

A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT DATED
JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15.
DOCKET:

A-48-16



STYLE OF CAUSE:

DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN



PLACE OF HEARING:

Fredericton,
New Brunswick

DATE OF HEARING:

May 24, 2017

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY:

WEBB J.A.
NEAR J.A.
GLEASON J.A.

DATED:

October 30, 2017





APPEARANCES:
David Raymond Amos


For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal
(on his own behalf)

Jan Jensen


For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL

SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Nathalie G. Drouin
Deputy Attorney General of Canada

For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL



http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2017/12/attn-simon-fish-of-bmo-and-robert.html


Thursday, 21 December 2017

Attn Simon Fish of the BMO and Robert Kennedy of Dentons I just called
from 902 800 0369 Play dumb all you wish The BMO has had my documents
for years

https://www.scribd.com/document/367699089/The-Scotia-Bank-and-The-Bank-of-Montreal

https://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/integrity-yea-right


While I was publishing this in my blog the lawyer Bobby Baby Kennedy called
back from (416) 846-6598 and played as dumb. Hell he even claimed that he
did not know who Frank McKenna was  No partner even a lowly collection
dude within Dentons is allowed to be THAT stupid.


> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400
> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> To: coi@gnb.ca
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Good Day Sir
>
> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and managed
> to speak to one of your staff for the first time
>
> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the lady who
> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after the Sgt
> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal Tanker
> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document.
>
> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I
> suggested that you study closely.
>
> This is the docket in Federal Court
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=T-1557-15&select_court=T
>
> These are digital recordings of  the last three hearings
>
> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/BahHumbug
>
> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/Jan11th2015
>
> April 3rd, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/April32017JusticeLeblancHearing
>
>
> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal
>
> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj.gc.ca/IndexingQueries/infp_RE_info_e.php?court_no=A-48-16&select_court=All
>
>
> The only hearing thus far
>
> May 24th, 2017
>
> https://archive.org/details/May24thHoedown
>
>
> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity
>
> Date: 20151223
>
> Docket: T-1557-15
>
> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015
>
> PRESENT:        The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell
>
> BETWEEN:
>
> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS
>
> Plaintiff
>
> and
>
> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
>
> Defendant
>
> ORDER
>
> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, on
> December 14, 2015)
>
> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion pursuant to
> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on November
> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of Claim
> in its entirety.
>
> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my attention a
> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my then
> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the Canadian
> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen Quigg,
> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal).  In that letter
> he stated:
>
> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you check the
> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm including you.
> You are your brother’s keeper.
>
> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a former
> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In addition to
> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a number of
> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be witnesses
> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are known to
> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime
> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former
> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba Court of
> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob Moore;
> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; former
> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former Staff
> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick Court
> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, retired
> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted
> Police.
>
> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my
> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with many
> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, I am
> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias should I
> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment in
> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board et al,
> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding
> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither party has
> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do so.
>
>
> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the Administrator of
> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion.  There
> is no order as to costs.
>
> “B. Richard Bell”
> Judge
>
>
> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one comment
> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I had sent
> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006.
>
>  I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the  the Court
> Martial Appeal Court of Canada  Perhaps you should scroll to the
> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83  of my
> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada?
>
> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest Trudeau the most
>
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca
> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM
> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the CROWN in
> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to
> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust that you
> dudes are way past too late
> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>
> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me rejoindre à
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un courriel à
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at
> lalanthier@hotmail.com
>
> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to
> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca
>
> Thank you,
>
> Merci ,
>
>
> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html
>
>
> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
> five years after he began his bragging:
>
> January 13, 2015
> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>
> December 8, 2014
> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>
> Friday, October 3, 2014
> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>
> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>
> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
> campaign of 2006.
>
> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>
> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>
> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>
> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>
> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the actions of
> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the CBC have
> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is ethical.
> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me.
>
> Subject:
> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400
> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca
> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
>
> January 30, 2007
>
> WITHOUT PREJUDICE
>
> Mr. David Amos
>
> Dear Mr. Amos:
>
> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of December 29,
> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP.
>
> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, I have
> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant Commissioner Steve
> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Honourable Michael B. Murphy
> Minister of Health
>
> CM/cb
>
>
> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote:
>
> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500
> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca,
> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net,
> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com
> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, riding@chuckstrahl.com,John.Foran@gnb.ca,
> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has
> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not
>
> Dear Mr. Amos,
>
> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days off
> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest assured I
> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your concerns.
>
> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our position
> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not process
> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to the
> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide these
> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in this
> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be done.
>
> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false
> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is clear
> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in Canada
> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment
> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB.
>
> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we had on
> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future endeavors.
>
>  Sincerely,
>
> Warren McBeath, Cpl.
> GRC Caledonia RCMP
> Traffic Services NCO
> Ph: (506) 387-2222
> Fax: (506) 387-4622
> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca
>
>
>
> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C.,
> Office of the Integrity Commissioner
> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street
> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1
> tel.: 506-457-7890
> fax: 506-444-5224
> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:35 AM
> Subject: RE My complaint against the CROWN in Federal Court Attn David
> Hansen and Peter MacKay If you planning to submit a motion for a
> publication ban on my complaint trust that you dudes are way past too late
> To: David.Hansen@justice.gc.ca, peter.mackay@justice.gc.ca
> peacock.kurt@telegraphjournal.com, mclaughlin.heather@dailygleaner.com,
> david.akin@sunmedia.ca, robert.frater@justice.gc.ca, paul.riley@ppsc-sppc.gc.ca,
> greg@gregdelbigio.com, joyce.dewitt-vanoosten@gov.bc.ca,
> joan.barrett@ontario.ca, jean-vincent.lacroix@gouv.qc.ca,
> peter.rogers@mcinnescooper.com
, mfeder@mccarthy.ca, mjamal@osler.com
> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com, gopublic@cbc.ca,
> Whistleblower@ctv.ca
>
> https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do
>
> http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/WebDocuments-DocumentsWeb/35072/FM030_Respondent_Attorney-General-of-Canada-on-Behalf-of-the-United-States-of-America.pdf
>
> http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/re-glen-greenwald-and-brazilian.html
>
> I repeat what the Hell do I do with the Yankee wiretapes taps sell
> them on Ebay or listen to them and argue them with you dudes in
> Feferal Court?
>
> Petey Baby loses all parliamentary privelges in less than a month but
> he still supposed to be an ethical officer of the Court CORRECT?
>
> Veritas Vincit
> David Raymond Amos
> 902 800 0369
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:10:14 -0400
> Subject: Yo Mr Bauer say hey to your client Obama and his buddies in
> the USDOJ for me will ya?
> To: RBauer@perkinscoie.com, sshimshak@paulweiss.com,
> cspada@lswlaw.com, msmith@svlaw.com, bginsberg@pattonboggs.com,
> gregory.craig@skadden.com, pm@pm.gc.ca, bob.paulson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca,
> bob.rae@rogers.blackberry.net, MulcaT@parl.gc.ca,  leader@greenparty.ca
> Cc: alevine@cooley.com, david.raymond.amos@gmail.com,
> michael.rothfeld@wsj.com, remery@ecbalaw.com
>
> QSLS Politics
> By Location Visit Detail
> Visit 29,419
> Domain Name usdoj.gov ? (U.S. Government)
> IP Address 149.101.1.# (US Dept of Justice)
> ISP US Dept of Justice
> Location Continent : North America
> Country : United States (Facts)
> State : District of Columbia
> City : Washington
> Lat/Long : 38.9097, -77.0231 (Map)
> Language English (U.S.) en-us
> Operating System Microsoft WinXP
> Browser Internet Explorer 8.0
> Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET
> CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; InfoPath.2;
> DI60SP1001)
> Javascript version 1.3
> Monitor Resolution : 1024 x 768
> Color Depth : 32 bits
> Time of Visit Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 pm
> Last Page View Nov 17 2012 6:33:08 p...

[Message clipped]  View entire message






http://michaelbryant.com/

Credentials

• Executive Director & General Counsel, Canadian Civil Liberties Association
• Attorney General of Ontario 2003-2007
• Clerked at Supreme Court of Canada for present Chief Justice of Canada
• LL.M. from Harvard University
• 2nd in Class at Osgoode Hall Law School
• Taught Criminal Law at King’s College, University of London
• Co-Authored book Criminal Law, published by Cavendish
• Lawyer since 1996, practising at McCarthys LLP and Norton Rose Fulbright LLP
• Cabinet Minister 2003-2009
• Member of Provincial Parliament 1999-2009

Latest Tweets

bryant@michaelbryant.com




https://ccla.org/staff/






Does not provide legal advice

Organization:	Canadian Civil Liberties Association
Phone Numbers:	416-363-0321
Fax:	416-861-1291
Email:	mail@ccla.org
Website:	www.ccla.org
Address:	90 Eglinton Ave E, Suite 900 Toronto, ON M4P 2Y3  Map
Intersection:	Yonge St and Eglinton Ave E
Hours:	Mon-Fri 9 am-5 pm
Executives:	Michael Bryant - Executive Director and General Counsel 416-363-0321 ext 256 April Julian - Director of Education 416-363-0321 ext 228 * education@ccla.org
Contacts:	Rayna Fletcher - Director of Administration 416-363-0321 ext 230 * rfletcher@ccla.org
Service Description:	Promotes legal protection of civil rights and liberties, particularly with reference to freedom of expression, police powers, government intrusions * organizes court interventions * presents briefs to provincial and federal legislative committees * provides deputations to public inquiries * education programme provides seminars and workshops in schools and education faculties * does not provide legal advice