Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Auditor general's former deputy says firing was 'retaliatory'

$
0
0
 
 

Auditor general's former deputy says firing was 'retaliatory'

Janice Leahy was among a dozen employees who left the office in 2023

New Brunswick's auditor general is facing a lawsuit by his former deputy, who alleges in a court filing that her firing earlier this year was "retaliatory." 

Janice Leahy was one of a dozen employees of the office who left their positions this year for reasons Auditor General Paul Martin has refused to discuss.

"The termination was retaliatory in nature given the positions taken by the plaintiff [Leahy] and was in bad faith," Leahy says in a statement of claim filed Nov. 22.

She and her lawyer Robert Basque turned down an interview request, and her filing does not elaborate on what was retaliatory about her firing.

Man smiling at camera Auditor General Paul Martin refused to comment on the lawsuit Monday. (Jacques Poitras / CBC)

Martin has filed a notice saying he plans to file a defence.

His office refused to comment on the lawsuit Monday.

"The Auditor General cannot discuss the matter as it is before the court," spokesperson Jolyne Roy told CBC News in an email.

None of Leahy's claims have been proven in court.

Green Leader David Coon said it's "very concerning" that Leahy is alleging retaliation for positions she took, given Martin and his team were working on a review of the government's COVID-19 response at the time.

MLAs, including Coon, questioned Martin's approach to the first phase of the review when he presented it to them in September after two postponements.

"It was very unusual to have a committee hearing with the auditor general where so many questions were asked to the auditor general about the process that he followed in this case, rather than clarifying the substance of his findings," Coon said. 

The second phase of Martin's COVID-19 audit will be released next week. 

A balding man with glasses is speaking inside the legislature. Green Leader David Coon says it’s 'very concerning' that Leahy is alleging retaliation for positions she took, given Martin and his team were working on a review of the government's COVID-19 response at the time. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Martin said in September there was no connection between the departures from his office and his approach to the pandemic audits.

The auditor general is an independent officer of the legislature whose mandate is to review government spending and programs.

Leahy said in the court filing that she was fired July 12 "without cause, and without notice" and is owed a higher severance package than what Martin gave her.

"The plaintiff was employed in a unique and highly specialized position and was highly paid compared to the average worker in New Brunswick," the claim says. 

Leahy had worked as the deputy auditor general since 2011.

Leahy says she was earning $166,166 a year, far more than the $107,249 annual salary in the new job she found at the Canada Revenue Agency in September.

She also says she was entitled to severance equivalent to 24 months' notice, not the 10 weeks she received.

She is claiming the difference, along with lost vacation pay, pension contributions she says Martin's office should have continued making past July and other amounts totalling $163,497.37.

Martin confirmed in August that 12 people — more than one-third of his staff — had left his office since the start of 2023.

During his September appearance before the legislature's public accounts committee, he said some of them were lured away by competitive job offers from the private sector.

But he refused to say how many left for that reason or whether any were fired.

He also said his office had adopted a new strategic plan since he took over at the start of 2022, a plan that includes "building a strong team to achieve our mission, our goals and objectives."

He said his office offers "a safe and welcoming work environment" to a diverse group of employees, which had allowed him to fill the vacancies.

Martin would not say Monday whether anyone else has left his office since he confirmed 12 departures in August.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
42 Comments 
 
 
 
David Amos 

"Leahy says she was earning $166,166 a year, far more than the $107,249 annual salary in the new job she found at the Canada Revenue Agency in September"

Trust that the lady had been made very aware of my concerns with the CRA since 2017 when she was the deputy auditor general she called me and I was happy that she did so.

 
 
David Amos 
"The Auditor General cannot discuss the matter as it is before the court," spokesperson Jolyne Roy told CBC News in an email.

Madame Roy and her boss should give my emails to their lawyers

 
Harvey York  
Reply to David Amos
No...no they shouldn't.  
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Harvey York   
Are you afraid she will? 

 
David Amos 
Reply to Harvey York
Did you and Higgy check out the decision I got yesterday without Martin's assistance? 
 
 
Harvey York  
Reply to David Amos
What did you win? An all-expenses paid vacation to Restigouche?   
 
 
 
 
G. Timothy Walton 
Interesting.

After a whole lot of the office leaves, the #2 person gets fired. Has anyone checked into whether that was the end of the departures?

 
Geordan Mann  
Reply toG. Timothy Walton  
If I recall there was another story on this site a while ago and it said there were firings earlier and then a bunch of people left. I don't think it said who went when but could be mistaken.
 
 
Allan Marven 
Reply toG. Timothy Walton  
Yeah she wouldn't quit so she was fired.
 
 
David Amos
Reply toGeordan Mann 
You are correct 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to
Their incompetence? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to
 

Reply toKyle WoodmanThe AG is appointed by the LG through an all party recommendation and work under their own directive but you keep working on your conspiracy theories. Maybe aliens are part of the answer dimwit.  
Reply to Ronald Miller   
David and I were having a conversation Ronald. Your opinions are not helpful.

 
David Amos
Reply to 
Actually I find their attacks on me useful It certainly beats being ignored
 
 
 
 
Geordan Mann  
Something seriously wrong here. 1/3 of staff who are probably professionals left or were fired for no reason. I doubt that. That is just crazy. It smells bad and there should really be an investigation into this.
 
 
David Amos
Reply toGeordan Mann 
Check my work  

Reply to Ronald Miller   
How does it feel to simply follow someone blindly? It must hurt a bit when people start asking hard questions. 
Reply to Ronald Miller 
My mini me is up early this morning posting.
Reply to Geordan Mann
But Higgs is the boss

Reply to Ronald Miller 
You tell em mini me.
 
 
David Amos
 
Reply to Ronald Miller
LMAO
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Ronald Miller 
Too funny
 
 
 
Allan Marven  
Looks like he needs a taste of his own medicine 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply toAllan Marven   
Perhaps he will partake of Higgy's butter tarts 
 
 
 
 
David Peters 
"The Auditor General cannot discuss the matter as it is before the court,..."

The one person who the public pays a massive wage to to oversee gov spending and actions has decided to not speak. Why are we paying for an AG, again?

-sound of crickets-

Free-for-all at the trough continues...

 
Ronald McCallum 
Reply toDavid Peters   
"The one person who the public pays a massive wage to to oversee gov spending and actions has decided to not speak. Why are we paying for an AG, again?"

The Auditor General does NOT oversee government spending, the Executive Council (Cabinet), the Finance Department and the Treasury Board does that.

The Auditor General is an independent Officer of the Parliament (Legislature) of the Province of New Brunswick that completes EXTERNAL AUDITS and specialized examinations of the Executive Government and bureaucracy to ensure that the money is being well-spent:

"The auditor general is an independent officer of the legislature whose mandate is to review government spending and programs."

""The Auditor General cannot discuss the matter as it is before the court,...""

That is standard procedure for matters that are before the Courts, and to do otherwise would be inviting Contempt of Court charges from the Court.

 
David Peters
Reply to Ronald McCallum 
Reporting to shareholders(citizens of NB) is what the AG is paid to do. How would that be a contempt of court? Imo, that would be upholding a legal contract, and muzzling the AG is a breach of contract. 
 
 
Ronald McCallum 
Reply toDavid Peters  
Naturally, you would take the comment out of context, here is what was published in the story:

""His office refused to comment on the lawsuit Monday.

"The Auditor General cannot discuss the matter as it is before the court," spokesperson Jolyne Roy told CBC News in an email."

The Auditor General can NOT and should NOT comment on any matter that is before the Courts.

With regards to the Auditor General's audits and reviews of the Government's COVID-19 strategies and programs, the article does report the following:

"MLAs, including Coon, questioned Martin's approach to the first phase of the review when he presented it to them in September after two postponements.

"It was very unusual to have a committee hearing with the auditor general where so many questions were asked to the auditor general about the process that he followed in this case, rather than clarifying the substance of his findings," Coon said.

The second phase of Martin's COVID-19 audit will be released next week."

Therefore, the Auditor General was reporting to the elected representatives of the people of New Brunswick.

 
Geordan Mann
Reply to Ronald McCallum 
I think any of these independent officers are still subject to review by the legislative assembly. According to the website, he reports to them so if there is something wrong, it falls on them to look into it. 
 
 
Ronald McCallum 
Reply toGeordan Mann 
I would think that you are right that the independent Officers of the Parliament (Legislature) would be subject to review by the Legislative Assembly, However, they are unable to publicly comment on any matter before the Courts. 
 
 
David Peters
Reply to Ronald McCallum 
When it takes so long to 'bring it to court', that, in effect is gov muzzling the one big check on the massive, 10's of thousands bureaucracy. History shows the 'elected representatives' work for the billionaire class. Imo, the AG is one position who is paid to communicate to the public what is going on in the bureaucracy and should be doing so much more frequently. There is way too much secrecy in gov and no good excuse for it.  
 
 
Ronald McCallum 
Reply toDavid Peters   
I suspect that the Auditor General is actually paid to report to the Legislative Assembly of New Brunswick on the spending done by the Government, and as a consequence the report becomes public information.

Also, the Courts operate as an independent branch of the state, and the Executive Government would be unable to slow down the Court process for civil lawsuits.

Oh by the way, the Auditor General NEVER directly reports to the public. Remember during the 2011 Federal General Election, the Auditor General of Canada was unable to submit a report to the Speaker of the Senate, and to the Speaker of the House of Commons as the 40th Parliament had been dissolved, hence, the report could NOT be made public.

 
David Peters
Reply to Ronald McCallum 
When you add in how much $$$ gov funds media(coercion muzzling) and all the billions/yr in corp welfare(funding candidate campaigns), it's a nice, tidy little private party that the public doesn't need to know about. Just pay those taxes/inflation and move on. Check.
 
 
Ronald McCallum 
Reply toDavid Peters
Now, you are taking my words out of context.   
 
 
David Peters
Reply to Ronald McCallum
Not one bit. What you are describing is a system of investigation that's intended to hide corruption from the public, not reveal it. Prove me wrong. 
 
 
Ronald McCallum 
Reply toDavid Peters  
Actually, the Auditor General is paid to report to the Legislative Assembly no later than the 31st December:

"15(3) An annual report by the Auditor General to the Legislative Assembly shall be submitted to the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly on or before December 31 in the year to which the report relates, and the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly shall table each report before the Legislative Assembly without delay after receipt of it by him or her or, if the Legislative Assembly is not then in session, within ten days following the commencement of the next session of the Legislative Assembly."

So, the Auditor General is NOT being muzzled.

Source: https://www.canlii.org/en/nb/laws/stat/rsnb-2011-c-118/latest/rsnb-2011-c-118.html  
 
 
David Peters  
Reply to David Peters
Notice how we are talking about bureaucratic red tape and not what the government has been doing, internally. That is muzzling. Deny it, but that's what it is. Public health was weaponized and used against the public to coerce them to take a medical treatment, which has to be a Charter infraction. This is an attempt to use red tape to muzzle(hide from public) any kind of a real look into what happened backstage on this file.
 
 
David Amos 
Reply toDavid Peters
The Fat Lady ain't sung yet 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply toGeordan Mann
Bingo
 
 
 
Ron parker   
That's a lot of people to leave a good paying job, something is not right.
 
 
David Amos 
Reply toRon parker 
Hence the lawsuit 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Trending Articles