Christian conservative group recruiting voters to sway PC nominations
Faytene Grasseschi wants “pro-parental rights” candidates chosen for potential election
Faytene Grasseschi is urging people on her mailing list to join the party to ensure the PCs nominate candidates who she calls "pro-parental rights."
In a YouTube video, Grasseschi, a Quispamsis resident, points out that local riding nomination contests can be decided by just a handful of votes.
"We want to make sure that there are strong parental rights candidates, candidates that are going to represent families, the faith community and all the issues that we care about," she said.
"We're pointing you to the PCNB party because that's the party that will most likely have the parental rights candidates landing here in the next couple of weeks."
Grasseschi
says she met with Blaine Higgs in March in his role as Quispamsis MLA,
before the Policy 713 controversy began. She went online in July urging
New Brunswickers to sign up for the PC Party to support Higgs if there
were an internal leadership review vote. (Submitted by Faytene Grasseschi)
The sign-up form is on the website of her activist organization 4 My Canada.
"Encouraging people to engage in democracy is nothing new; 4 My Canada has been doing it for decades, as it is one of the stated purposes of the non-profit," she said in an email to CBC News, in which she turned down an interview request.
Grasseschi launched the Don't Delete Parents campaign earlier this year on the 4 My Canada website to support Higgs's changes to Policy 713.
Changes to the policy requires parents to consent if children under 16 want to change names or pronouns to reflect their sexual orientation or gender identity.
Before the changes, school staff had to develop plans to informally accommodate the student's wishes in the classroom if the student didn't want their parents notified.
WATCH | Activism or advancement: N.B. parent questions motives:
Shawn Rouse says 'pro-parental rights' label is misleading.
The change was the catalyst for a revolt within the PC party, and its caucus of MLAs, over Higgs's leadership and decision-making style.
The premier says he has been "very close" to calling an election this fall to put an end to the instability in his caucus.
Grasseschi, well-known in Christian conservative circles for her Faytene TV current affairs show, went online in July urging New Brunswickers to sign up for the party to support Higgs if there were an internal leadership review vote.
That vote never happened, but she is using that mailing list now to help people buy PC memberships to vote in local riding nomination contests that would unfold quickly, if Higgs calls an election.
Supporters
of gender policy in New Brunswick schools have held rallies over the
past several months, after changes were announced to Policy 713. (Lars Schwarz/CBC)
Shawn Rouse, the parent of a transgender student who opposed Higgs's Policy 713 changes, says Grasseschi has the right to influence the political process but said it "can be very dangerous to weaponize politics."
He said the "pro-parental rights" label is misleading.
"We know what that means is it takes away the ability for the child under 16 in New Brunswick schools to be able to choose when they come out to their parents and at school."
Rouse said since Grasseschi doesn't have a trans child, "I'm not sure why she's so passionate about this issue. It makes me ask what she has to gain, and it certainly seems like she's looking to further her political career with it."
Until yesterday, the sign-up page on Grasseschi's 4 My Canada website included data with the name of the Hampton-Fundy-St. Martins provincial riding.
That constituency is next to the Quispamsis riding, where she lives and where Higgs plans to run again.
WATCH | From July 2023: Faytene Grasseschi on her political engagement strategy:
Group backing Blaine Higgs on Policy 713 looking to recruit voters to join Tories.
Grasseschi refused in two email exchanges with CBC News to say whether she plans to run.
She said the mention of the Hampton riding name in the web page data was a mistake.
"The title on the form is incorrect," she wrote in the email. "As the graphic clearly says, the form is not riding-specific, but for the entire province. I'll see if one of the team can look into that and update it as I can see how that would be confusing."
The label was changed as of Tuesday morning.
The PC riding association president in Hampton-Fundy-St. Martins, Jeremy Salgado, said he hasn't heard whether current MLA Gary Crossman will run again.
Salgado said there have been rumours about Grasseschi running but nothing official.
Former adherents of a religious movement called the New Apostolic Reformation told CBC News this summer that many of Grasseschi's past statements as an activist align with tenets of the NAR, which seeks to put people with Christian values in charge of political institutions.
She responded at the time that her faith is about service and is "never about control," and that her views had changed over the years.
"As we go, we mature and deepen in understanding," she said.
Grasseschi sought the federal Conservative nomination for Saint John-Rothesay in the 2021 election, and in a July interview with CBC News said she had thought "vaguely" about running provincially someday.
She also said at the time the mailing list she was gathering to support Higgs could be put to use in a future election.
"There's power in engagement. The nation and our communities are shaped by those who show up in the process. So I'm going to continue to create levers to onramp people into the democratic process," she said in July.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
369 Comments
David R. Amos
The plot thickens
Brian Cohen
Who knew that when JC of the bible talked about
inclusion and acceptance of others he ONLY meant those who shared
exactly his own beliefs, opinions and views?
Kat Burd
Reply to Brian Cohen
And who knew when he said not to judge he really meant to judge by our own prejudices?
Kyle Woodman
Reply to Brian Cohen
Umm, if you read the Bible, you will soon find out that Jesus associated with all kinds of sinners. It was basically his flock.
Brian Cohen
Reply to Kyle Woodman
Which was my point Kyle
Kyle Woodman
Reply to Brian Cohen
Oh no I was agreeing with you.
David R. Amos
Reply to Brian Cohen
Wow
Right Now is a not-for-profit committed to nominating and electing pro-life candidates across the cou
Page· Nonprofit organization
(587) 435-0166
info@itstartsrightnow.ca
Rating · 3.3 (327 Reviews)
Friday, 14 July 2023
Christian conservative group recruiting thousands to back Higgs
The Writ Podcast - Ep. #101: Can Blaine Higgs hold on?
1.84K subscribers
Michelle LeBlanc and Jacques Poitras discuss the latest upheavals in New Brunswick politics.
Christian conservative group recruiting thousands to back Higgs
2 activists say they’ll urge people to join PC party to vote for premier in leadership review
It and another organization rallying support for the embattled Progressive Conservative leader have flexed their muscles in the last month, gathering enough names to swing the vote in his favour.
"A lot of times it's hundreds or even dozens of people that can make a difference in some of these elections," said Faytene Grasseschi, who runs the group 4 My Canada from Quispamsis, outside Saint John.
As of Wednesday she said she had collected almost 9,000 names from across Canada, including 2,000 from New Brunswick who could sign up as provincial PC members.
In
a statement, New Brunswick Premier Blaine Higgs said he has received
support 'from a wide cross section of individuals' who come from
'different backgrounds, different cultures, and different religions.' (CBC)
"If it goes to a leadership review, I think it's buying that membership and making your voice heard," said Grasseschi.
"This is just basic democracy, right?"
Another group, Right Now, has more than 1,200 signatures. Co-founder Alissa Golob estimates more than 90 per cent of them are from New Brunswickers who are eligible to become provincial party members.
"We'll be ready if it does come to a leadership review or if it comes down to an election," said Golob, who describes her organization as non-religious.
Twenty-six PC riding association presidents have signed letters calling for a review, hoping to trigger a vote by members on whether to dump Higgs. New Brunswick's premier has lost or fired several cabinet ministers in recent months over his leadership style, and stance on issues like a gender policy in the province's schools.
The next hurdle is a two-thirds vote by the party's governing body to schedule a convention. But if that happens, Higgs has a good chance of surviving thanks to Grasseschi and Golob.
Just 2,732 PC members cast ballots in the third and final round of the party's 2016 leadership vote that Higgs won.
His margin was 394 votes — far fewer than the number of names collected by 4 My Canada and Right Now.
"The nation and our communities are shaped by those who show up in the process," Grasseschi said.
Groups leapt into action over Policy 713
The two groups started mobilizing last month after Higgs faced a cabinet and caucus revolt in the legislature over changes to Policy 713.
The original policy required school staff to respect the name and pronoun choices of students under 16 in the classroom, without notifying parents if that's what the child wanted.
WATCH | Faytene Grasseschi says influencing PC vote is 'basic democracy'
Now, if a child refuses to include parents, they'll be directed to a school psychologist or social worker to come up with a plan to include them. In the interim, teachers and staff are required to use the child's given name and pronoun at birth.
Two ministers resigned from cabinet after joining four other PCs to vote with the opposition to help pass a Liberal motion calling for more consultations.
They said they quit over broader problems with the premier's top-down leadership style, but Higgs has insisted the rebellion is about Policy 713 and parents' rights.
In a recent interview on True North, a conservative digital media site, Grasseschi said the original policy assumed "every parent is a villain. [But] most parents are not villains."
In fact, the policy was aimed at a tiny percentage of parents who might react badly or even violently if their children revealed they were questioning or changing their gender identity.
Grasseschi told CBC News that Higgs is trying to "strike a balance" to protect "vulnerable youth" while respecting the role of parents.
Author says trans issues 'a new hub' for Christian conservatives
Grasseschi is something of a celebrity in Christian conservative circles.
She first came to prominence as an organizer of mass prayer rallies called TheCry and founded 4 My Canada in 2006.
In 2009 well-known Canadian televangelist David Mainse compared her to Old Testament figures Deborah and Esther, saying she had a "prophetic edge."
Journalist Marci McDonald, author of a 2010 book on the Christian conservative movement, called her "very compelling and charismatic" and "one of the leading figures in this country's emerging Christian right."
McDonald said in an interview she believes Grasseschi and others are using the issue of LGBTQ rights in schools as "a new hub to get Christians, evangelical Christians, the religious right, involved in politics again, as a new rallying cry.
"They haven't had a rallying issue since same-sex marriage that brought people out to the polls."
Support can grow 'exponentially,' says Right Now co-founder
Right Now has existed since 2016 and focuses mainly on abortion.
Its online petition to support Higgs cites both Policy 713 and his refusal to fund abortions in Fredericton's Clinic 554.
Golob said she believes most of the New Brunswickers who have signed are not PC members because many of them opposed some of his other policies, such as COVID-19 restrictions early in the pandemic.
But she said they form a base that can be deployed in any leadership review or election where Higgs's future is on the line.
Roxana
Kreklo, a Sussex parent of school-age children who works for Harvest
Prison Ministries, says she joined the Progressive Conservative Party
two weeks ago expressly to support Higgs. (Ed Hunter/CBC)
"You can grow that exponentially as long as you have that solid foundation," she said.
In a statement, Higgs said he has received support "from a wide cross section of individuals" who come from "different backgrounds, different cultures, and different religions."
He said "despite their differences," they share his belief and support what he calls his balanced approach.
Sussex parent joins PCs to back Higgs
The strategy of the two groups is already bearing fruit.i
Roxana Kreklo, a Sussex parent of school-age children who works for Harvest Prison Ministries, said she joined the PC party two weeks ago expressly to support Higgs.
"I think it's important for all of us to get involved civically," she said.
Kreklo moved to Canada as a child from Romania, shortly after the collapse of Communist rule there — one reason she said she's getting involved politically now.
"I understand the value of of coming to a place that is a free and democratic society," she said. "So I want to do what I can to preserve that for my kids and for other kids as well."
Grasseschi disputes author's description
McDonald said Grasseschi is part of a movement called the New Aposotolic Reformation that aims to put believers in government leadership positions so Canada can be "restored to be a Christian nation in time for the second coming of Christ," she said.
Grasseschi would not confirm that.
"You know, that would be a good question," she told CBC News. "I don't know. I hear these types of terms thrown around. People assume that I know. I actually have the same question myself."
But Grasseschi said she is not aiming to create the kind of Christian-based government McDonald claims.
She also said her history with the Christian conservative movement isn't relevant to the current debate in New Brunswick.
"I think every young person wants to change the world," she said. "Once we get older, we just want the government to stay out of our pockets and not delete us from the lives of our kids."
What's next after Policy 713?
Grasseschi and Kreklo are both vague on whether they want further changes to the guidelines around LGBTQ students or other policies.
"Of course I haven't dissected the policy," Kreklo said. "I've just been made aware of it. … So as it stands right now, I'm happy with that first point of keeping the lines of communication open."
Grasseschi hopes to persuade the province to issue tax credits to parents who take their children out of public schools and enrol them in private schools, in effect allowing them to move their tax dollars out of the public system.
Grasseschi says met with Higgs in March in his role as Quispamsis MLA,
before the Policy 713 controversy began. (Submitted by Faytene
Grasseschi)
Higgs's spokesperson was asked for a comment on that idea, but the premier's statement to CBC News didn't include a response.
Grasseschi would not say if she'll lobby Higgs for more on Policy 713 or on issues such as abortion access or Medicare coverage of gender-confirming surgery for transgender people.
"If some of these other things come back onto the radar down the line, maybe we can have another conversation at that point," she said
Political activism separate from charity group, Grasseschi says
Besides running 4 My Canada, Grasseschi is also executive director of a charity called V-Kol Media Ministries, which runs a range of programs and produces her Faytene TV show.
The program, which looks at current affairs from a faith-based perspective, airs online and on several cable channels.
V-Kol and 4 My Canada shared the same mailing address, but Grasseschi said they are "separate legally and financially" and she recently set up a separate post office box for the charity to make that clear.
V-Kol issues charitable tax receipts to donors, so it is restricted from political advocacy, while 4 My Canada, a non-profit without charitable status, is free to be vocal and active.
Right Now and 4 My Canada also operate outside provincial laws on election transparency.
Since 2015, Elections New Brunswick has required party leadership candidates and riding nomination candidates to register and disclose their donors.
But there's no such rule for party leadership reviews.
There are also rules on third-party advertising, but they only apply during election campaigns.
Grasseschi won't rule out another election run
Grasseschi herself has already waded directly into electoral politics.
Not long after moving to New Brunswick, she ran unsuccessfully to be the Conservative Party of Canada candidate for Saint John-Rothesay in the last federal election.
Not
long after moving to New Brunswick, Grasseschi ran unsuccessfully to be
the Conservative Party of Canada candidate for Saint John-Rothesay in
the last federal election, but she lost to former Saint John mayor Mel
Norton. (Graham Thompson/CBC)
She lost to former Saint John mayor Mel Norton, who went on to lose to Liberal incumbent Wayne Long.
She is not ruling out running federally again. She also said she has thought "vaguely, vaguely" about running provincially in Quispamsis whenever Higgs retires as MLA.
"Right now I'm just trying to get my laundry done," she said. "Right now I'm just trying to get to tomorrow. But we all take things a day at a time in this world, right?"
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
With files from Alix Villeneuve, Radio-Canada
4038 Comments
David Amos
For the record I never heard of Alissa Golob or her group until today but Higgy may rest assured that I called them right now
John Pawluck
Reply to David Amos
What did they tell you.
David Amos
Surprise Surprise Surprise
Western office: 587-435-0166
info@itstartsrightnow.ca
PO Box 53029 Rideau Centre RO, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 1C5, Canada
"Not long after moving to New Brunswick, Grasseschi ran unsuccessfully to be the Conservative Party of Canada candidate for Saint John-Rothesay in the last federal election, but she lost to former Saint John mayor Mel Norton.
She is not ruling out running federally again. She also
said she has thought "vaguely, vaguely" about running provincially in
Quispamsis whenever Higgs retires as MLA."
Kyle Woodman
Reply to David Amos
Not long after moving to New Brunswick indeed. Someone
doesn't have a good grasp on the average New Brunswicker. Lots of
religious folks in the province. Most of them are tolerant of others and
keep their religious views to themselves. As it should be.
David Amos
Reply to Kyle Woodman
I crossed paths with the lady as soon as she landed here and was far from impressed but said nothing
Andy House
Grasseschi is wrong, what she is doing is not
""This is just basic democracy, right?". What she is doing is
single-issue activism, one trick pony style. The model is American
primary election politics where the "winners" are frequently determined
by the turnout of the most extreme members and are too extreme to win
generals. This is not "wrong" but it is "playing" the system to achieve
narrow objectives that seldom align with what the actual majority
wants.
Abe Miller
Reply to Andy House
What you just did was express the problem with
democracy. It is the conflict between views, where the minority always
loses. Why is it that people believe that minorities shouldn't have
rights?
David Amos
Reply to Andy House We talked recently correct?
https://www.itstartsrightnow.ca/about
WHO WE ARE
We’re a group of passionate strategists who understand the need for effective political campaigns that get results. We are inclusive, we are diverse and we are here to win.
Alissa Golob, Co-Founder
Scott Hayward, Co-Founder
HOW WE STARTED
After
being born into one of the only countries in the world with no law on
abortion and working full-time in the political pro-life movement that
saw little success, we realized it’s time for change. Instead of
rallying and protests, we’re organizing and mobilizing to effectively
nominate and elect pro-life politicians across the country, so we can
start passing life-saving legislation for the first time in over 40
years.
OUR MISSION
RightNow exists to nominate and elect pro-life politicians by mobilizing Canadians on the ground level to vote at local nomination meetings, and provide training to volunteers across the country to create effective campaign teams in every riding across Canada. It is only when we have a majority of pro-life politicians in our legislatures, that we’ll see pro-life legislation passed in our country.Contact Us
Eastern office: 204-573-0296Western office: 587-435-0166
info@itstartsrightnow.ca
PO Box 53029 Rideau Centre RO, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 1C5, Canada
Round 2: Convoy demands Deja Vu Anyone???
David Amos<david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com> | Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:57 AM |
| To: bmiller@fosterllp.ca, bsvandenberg@fosterllp.ca, Eva@chipiuk-law.ca, keith@wilsonlawoffices.ca, Anthony.Rota@parl.gc.ca, "heather.bradley"<heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, Peggy.Regimbal@bellmedia.ca, patrickking@canada-unity.com, james@canada-unity.com, novaxpass@outlook.com, martin@canada-unity.com, tdundas10@gmail.com, jlaface@gmail.com, davesteenburg269@gmail.com, brown_tm3@yahoo.ca, leannemb <leannemb@protonmail.com>, harold@jonkertrucking.com, keepcanada@protonmail.com, andyjohanna01@hotmail.com, janiebpelchat@icloud.com, janetseto@protonmail.com, johndoppenberg@icloud.com, stiessen1979@gmail.com, 77cordoba@outlook.com, pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl.gc.ca, Patrick.Brazeau@sen.parl.gc.ca, george.furey@sen.parl.gc.ca, larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com, tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey"<barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, Newsroom <Newsroom@globeandmail.com>, Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>, tracy@uncoverdc.com, James@jamesfetzer.com, editor@americanthinker.com, nharris@maverick-media.ca, nouvelle <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, danajmetcalfe@icloud.com, lauralynnlive@protonmail.com, "andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, info@eurasiagroup.net, james@eastpointswest.co.uk, onair@moats.tv, dnaylor@westernstandardonline.com, "Lindsay.Mathyssen"<Lindsay.Mathyssen@parl.gc.ca>, bonita.zarrillo@parl.gc.ca, "Jenny.Kwan"<Jenny.Kwan@parl.gc.ca>, "Alistair.MacGregor"<Alistair.MacGregor@parl.gc.ca>, "Matthew.Green"<Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca>, "Gord.Johns"<Gord.Johns@parl.gc.ca>, "peter.julian"<peter.julian@parl.gc.ca>, "brian.masse"<brian.masse@parl.gc.ca>, "don.davies"<don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, "Alexandre.Boulerice"<Alexandre.Boulerice@parl.gc.ca>, lisamarie.barron@parl.gc.ca, "Richard.Cannings"<Richard.Cannings@parl.gc.ca>, "Taylor.Bachrach"<Taylor.Bachrach@parl.gc.ca>, "Laurel.Collins"<Laurel.Collins@parl.gc.ca>, "Rachel.Blaney"<Rachel.Blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "randall.garrison"<randall.garrison@parl.gc.ca>, cathay.wagantall@parl.gc.ca, Corey.Tochor@parl.gc.ca, kevin.waugh@parl.gc.ca, Brad.Redekopp@parl.gc.ca, fraser.tolmie@parl.gc.ca, "Gary.Vidal"<Gary.Vidal@parl.gc.ca>, Warren.Steinley@parl.gc.ca, "Michael.Kram"<Michael.Kram@parl.gc.ca>, kelly.block@parl.gc.ca, robert.kitchen@parl.gc.ca, Rosemarie.Falk@parl.gc.ca, randy.hoback@parl.gc.ca, Jeremy.Patzer@parl.gc.ca | |
| Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, leschied@protonmail.com, Caryma.Sad@gmail.com, erinbcomber1@icloud.com, beth.macdonell@bellmedia.ca, stoosnews@nexicom.net, media@eurasiagroup.net, "Chris.Hall"<Chris.Hall@cbc.ca>, Wesley.Wark@uottawa.ca, president@uottawa.ca, "presidents.office"<presidents.office@carleton.ca>, president <president@unb.ca> | |
http://davidraymondamos3. Sunday, 22 January 2023 Re: Convoy demands Deja Vu Anyone??? Your post titled "Re: Convoy demands Deja Vu Anyone???" has been reinstated Blogger <no-reply@google.com> Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:56 PM To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Hello, We have re-evaluated the post titled "Re: Convoy demands Deja Vu Anyone???" against Community Guidelines https://blogger.com/go/ reinstated. You may access the post at http://davidraymondamos3. Sincerely, Your post titled "The VERY corrupt cop ClaudeTremblay just wished me a Merry Xmass??? BAH HUMBUG" has been reinstated Blogger <no-reply@google.com> Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 3:46 PM To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Hello, We have re-evaluated the post titled "The VERY corrupt cop ClaudeTremblay just wished me a Merry Xmass??? BAH HUMBUG" against Community Guidelines https://blogger.com/go/ review, the post has been reinstated. You may access the post at http://davidraymondamos3. Sincerely, The Blogger Team Your post titled "Re: Convoy demands Deja Vu Anyone???" has been put behind a warning for readers Blogger <no-reply@google.com> Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 3:13 PM To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Hello, As you may know, our Community Guidelines (https://blogger.com/go/ what we allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "Re: Convoy demands Deja Vu Anyone???" was flagged to us for review. This post was put behind a warning for readers because it contains sensitive content; the post is visible at http://davidraymondamos3. Your blog readers must acknowledge the warning before being able to read the post/blog. Why was your blog post put behind a warning for readers? Your content has been evaluated according to our Adult Content policy. Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn more. We apply warning messages to posts that contain sensitive content. If you are interested in having the status reviewed, please update the content to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is updated, you may republish it at https://www.blogger.com/go/ This will trigger a review of the post. For more information, please review the following resources: Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/ Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/ Sincerely, The Blogger Team https://www.youtube.com/watch? Emergencies Act inquiry: Trudeau says act was "in back of our minds" but considered later | FULL Global News 3.38M subscribers 151,594 views Streamed live on Nov 25, 2022 Prime Minister Justin Trudeau testified Friday before the Public Order Emergencies Commission (POEC) about the invocation of the Emergencies Act in response to the "Freedom Convoy" back in Feb. 2022, and said that the act was "in the back of our minds" early on during the protests but it was only "seriously" considered later on. He went on to say that during a meeting with the Incident Response Group the night before the act was invoked, there had been "consensus" around the table. He said there was "no question about it," and no one around the table raised concerns about using the act in response to the "Freedom Convoy." The prime minister also said he had not made up his mind on invoking the act until paperwork to sign off on the decision, and a recommendation by the Clerk of the Privy Council to do so had been made. He said the fact the Clerk had recommended it, as well as considerations of what might have happened if he did not invoke the act, were factors in his final decision. The COVID-19 federal mandates also were raised during the testimony when questioned by lawyers representing Freedom Corp., with Trudeau saying he relied on health officials, scientists and experts to make these decisions to protect Canadians. He went on to deny he had called the unvaccinated "names," rather, he said he highlighted differences between those hesitant to get vaccinated "for any range of reasons" from people who "deliberately spread misinformation." 496 Comments David Amos David Amos Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive https://www.youtube.com/watch? National Update on Canada’s Courts with John Carpay Faytene Show 11.6K subscribers 791 views Premiered Jan 15, 2023 The Canadian Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms protect Canadian freedoms such as: - Mobility rights - Conscience rights - Freedom of peaceful assembly - Freedom of communication in the media - Protection from unreasonable seizure - Equal treatment before the law for all Canadians Currently, Canada’s courts are being flooded with cases where citizens are suing various levels of government for breaching their charter rights over the last few years. It is likely that our nation has never before seen such an influx of charter court cases in such a small window of time. The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms is on the frontlines, currently representing hundreds of these cases across the nation. Recently, founder John Carpay was detained in prison for 23 hrs for a related investigation that he was a part of 17 months ago. He is with us today to discuss what happened and some of the cases he and his team have been taking on— the most notable case of which is The Hon. Brian Peckford’s lawsuit against the federal government for breeching his mobility rights. Mr. Peckford is the last remaining architect of Canada’s Constitution. Thanks for joining us. 6 Comments David Amos David Amos Methinks this lady should have talked to me when she moved to my neck of the woods N'esy Pas? Round 2: Convoy demands Deja Vu Anyone??? David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. To: bmiller@fosterllp.ca, bsvandenberg@fosterllp.ca, Eva@chipiuk-law.ca, keith@wilsonlawoffices.ca, Anthony.Rota@parl.gc.ca, "heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, Peggy.Regimbal@bellmedia.ca, patrickking@canada-unity.com, james@canada-unity.com, novaxpass@outlook.com, martin@canada-unity.com, tdundas10@gmail.com, jlaface@gmail.com, davesteenburg269@gmail.com, brown_tm3@yahoo.ca, leannemb <leannemb@protonmail.com>, harold@jonkertrucking.com, keepcanada@protonmail.com, andyjohanna01@hotmail.com, janiebpelchat@icloud.com, janetseto@protonmail.com, johndoppenberg@icloud.com, stiessen1979@gmail.com, 77cordoba@outlook.com, pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl. Patrick.Brazeau@sen.parl.gc.ca larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com, tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>, tracy@uncoverdc.com, James@jamesfetzer.com, editor@americanthinker.com, nharris@maverick-media.ca, nouvelle <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, danajmetcalfe@icloud.com, lauralynnlive@protonmail.com, <Chris.Hall@cbc.ca>, Wesley.Wark@uottawa.ca, president@uottawa.ca, "presidents.office"<presidents.office@carleton.ca <president@unb.ca> https://www.youtube.com/watch? Convoy organizers’ lawyer speaks to media after removal from Emergencies Act inquiry – Nov. 22, 2022 cpac 124K subscribers 260,602 views Nov 22, 2022 Brendan Miller, a lawyer representing a group of Freedom Convoy organizers at the Public Order Emergency Commission, speaks with reporters in Ottawa after being ordered to leave the inquiry’s public hearing by Commissioner Paul Rouleau. The commissioner’s order came following a dispute over Miller’s request to hear testimony from an additional witness. (November 22, 2022) Re: Convoy demands Merry Xmass??? Bah Humbug David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. To: bmiller@fosterllp.ca, bsvandenberg@fosterllp.ca, Eva@chipiuk-law.ca, keith@wilsonlawoffices.ca, Anthony.Rota@parl.gc.ca, "heather.bradley" <heather.bradley@parl.gc.ca>, Peggy.Regimbal@bellmedia.ca, patrickking@canada-unity.com, james@canada-unity.com, novaxpass@outlook.com, martin@canada-unity.com, tdundas10@gmail.com, jlaface@gmail.com, davesteenburg269@gmail.com, brown_tm3@yahoo.ca, leannemb <leannemb@protonmail.com>, harold@jonkertrucking.com, keepcanada@protonmail.com, andyjohanna01@hotmail.com, janiebpelchat@icloud.com, janetseto@protonmail.com, johndoppenberg@icloud.com, stiessen1979@gmail.com, 77cordoba@outlook.com, pierrette.ringuette@sen.parl. Patrick.Brazeau@sen.parl.gc.ca larry.campbell@sen.parl.gc.ca, Bev.Busson@sen.parl.gc.ca, info@lionelmedia.com, liveneedtoknow@gmail.com, tips@steeltruth.com, media@steeltruth.com, press@deepcapture.com, washington field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, bbachrach <bbachrach@bachrachlaw.net>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, "barbara.massey" <barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Norman Traversy <traversy.n@gmail.com>, news <news@dailygleaner.com>, nobyrne <nobyrne@unb.ca>, tracy@uncoverdc.com, James@jamesfetzer.com, editor@americanthinker.com, nharris@maverick-media.ca, nouvelle <nouvelle@acadienouvelle.com>, news-tips <news-tips@nytimes.com>, danajmetcalfe@icloud.com, lauralynnlive@protonmail.com, <Chris.Hall@cbc.ca>, Wesley.Wark@uottawa.ca, president@uottawa.ca, "presidents.office"<presidents.office@carleton.ca <president@unb.ca> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Brendan Miller <bmiller@fosterllp.ca> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 21:53:38 +0000 Subject: Automatic reply: Methinks Trudeau The Younger and his buddy Higgy wish that I did not save this video N'esy Pas Norm Traversy? To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Please be advised that from October 10, 2022 at 12:00AM through to and including November 25, 2022 at 11:59AM I will have limited access to my email, being email address bmiller@fosterllp.ca<mailto:bm the office. Though I typically accept services of applications, court process, and other documents via email, I will not be accepting service of same for the period of October 10, 2022 at 12:00AM through to and including November 25, 2022 at 11:59AM. If there is correspondence you absolutely need to send during the above time-period, you may send same by fax to Foster LLP (403-266-4741) to the attention of all three following lawyers please: (i) Leigh Sherry. (ii) Peter Crozier; & (iii) Rupert Joshi. If there is an emergency application or matter during the above time-period, you may serve the same by fax to Foster LLP (403-266-4741) to the attention of all three following lawyers please: (i) Leigh Sherry. (ii) Peter Crozier; & (iii) Rupert Joshi. If there is an emergency requiring that you speak to me by phone during the above time-period and you do not already have my cellphone number, please email Bethany DeWolfe at bdewolfe@fosterllp.ca<mailto:b provide to you. Thereafter, please text or Imessage me regarding who it is and what you need, and I will get back to you. If prior to October 10, 2022 you need to contact me about something on a file or what to deal with something before October 10, 2022, please do so now. If we have provided agreed to dates or have dates booked for steps in litigation, questioning, court, or something of the like, those dates stand and will be going ahead with counsel from my firm, or agent counsel in lieu of my appearance, and should stay in your calendar. This letter is not to be interpreted as agreement to adjourn or cancel anything. Automatic reply: Convoy demands Deja Vu Anyone??? Boulerice, Alexandre Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Block, Kelly - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Tochor, Corey - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM MacGregor, Alistair - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Barron, Lisa Marie - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Blaney, Rachel - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Cannings, Richard - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Collins, Laurel - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Mathyssen, Lindsay - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Davies, Don - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Zarrillo, Bonita - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM Kwan, Jenny - M.P. Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Julian, Peter - M.P.<peter.julian@parl.gc.ca> Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 1:11 PM To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. I called again Correct Tom Taggart and Brad Johns??? David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. To: brianwongmla@gmail.com, mla@esmithmccrossinmla.com, office@angelasimmonds.ca, info@loreleinicollmla.ca, info@carmankerr.ca, jessomeben@gmail.com, keith@irvingmla.ca, tonyince@tonyincemla.ca, info@braedonclark.ca, kendracoombesmla@gmail.com, claudiachendermla@gmail.com, info@patriciaarab.ca, brendan@brendanmaguire.ca, mla@northsidewestmount.ca Cc: larryharrisonmla@gmail.com, garyburrillmla@gmail.com, ca@zachchurchill.com, info@iainrankin.ca, toryrushtonmla@bellaliant.com Bcc: myson333 <myson333@yahoo.com> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 15:47:24 -0400 Subject: Re: I called again Correct Tom Taggart and Brad Johns??? To: Tom.Taggartmla@gmail.com, "jagmeet.singh" <jagmeet.singh@parl.gc.ca>, Candice.Bergen@parl.gc.ca, NightTimePodcast <NightTimePodcast@gmail.com>, tim <tim@halifaxexaminer.ca>, jennifer@halifaxexaminer.ca, paulpalango <paulpalango@protonmail.com>, andrewjdouglas@gmail.com, info@alidualemla.ca, suzyhalifaxneedham@gmail.com, conflict.commissioner@ info@ronnieleblanc.ca, Rafah@rafahdicostanzo.com, info@mombourquette.ca, mla@northsidewestmount.ca, LisaLachanceMLA@gmail.com, susanleblancMLA@bellaliant.com mlabradjohns@gmail.com, mlabradjohns.assistant@gmail. Cc: justmin <justmin@gov.ns.ca>, "Brenda.Lucki" <Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, smcneil@coxandpalmer.com ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Brad Johns, MLA Sackville - Uniacke"<mlabradjohns@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:27:16 -0800 Subject: Thank you for your email. Re: I called again Correct Tom Taggart and Brad Johns??? To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Hello, This is an automated response to confirm that your email has been received by MLA Brad Johns. In order to help answer your concern in a timely manner please forward your concern, with address, to mlabradjohns.assistant@gmail. Any correspondence for the Attorney General of Nova Scotia or the Minister of Justice should be sent to justmin@novascotia.ca In order to ensure constituent email is addressed in the most timely manner, if you are a resident and you require follow up, make sure that you have included your residential address and contact phone number. This will allow someone from our office to better sort, respond or directly contact you about your concern much faster. Please accept my apologizes in advance and thank you for your co-operation. Brad -- Brad Johns Member of the Nova Scotia Legislative Assembly Sackville - Uniacke (902) 865-6467 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Tom Taggart <tom.taggartmla@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:27:16 -0800 Subject: Re: I called again Correct Tom Taggart and Brad Johns??? To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. Thank you for contacting us at the office of MLA Tom Taggart. This email is being monitored by my Constituency Assistant Andrea Johnson, who will get back to you as soon as possible. If your inquiry is urgent, please feel free to call the Constituency Office @ 902-641-2335 Our Office is located @ 10653 Hwy 2 Masstown, Nova Scotia, right next door to the Petro- Canada. Our Office hours are Monday- Friday 8:30am - 3:30pm or by appointment. We are closed on Holidays. My office has the COVID RAPID TEST KITS if you need one please stop in a pick one up. -- Tom Taggart, MLA Colchester North (O) - 902-641-2335 tom.taggartmla@gmail.com Deja Vu Anyone???? Yo Premier Iain Rankin Methinks somebody should tell your buddy Timmy Boy Houston he picked a bad day not to come to the phone N'esy Pas? David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. To: BOB! B-O-B <coachwhitford1@gmail.com> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com> JD is just another piece of chickenshit Feel Free to tell him I said so On 8/6/21, BOB! B-O-B <coachwhitford1@gmail.com> wrote: > I listened to the court recordings, quite the difference in the sound of > Justice Bell's (I think his name is) when he came back from recess. Very > low voice and at times choking on his own words. Also the other justice, > Leblanc was it? He started off forcefully telling you "not to speak when I > am speaking", then after you patiently waited your turn and unloaded a few > of your facts his demeanor did a complete 180. Things that make you go > hmmmmm. Interesting stuff you sent. > > So what's JD's story? Is he a stand up guy or what? > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:01 AM David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > wrote: > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2021 18:02:43 -0300 >> Subject: Fwd: Yo Premier Iain Rankin Methinks somebody should tell >> your buddy Timmy Boy Houston he picked a bad day not to come to the >> phone N'esy Pas? >> To: brianwongpc2021@gmail.com, votemarni@gmail.com, >> anthony.edmonds@greenpartyns. >> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, >> "Bill.Blair"<Bill.Blair@parl.gc.ca>, pathealey@gmail.com >> >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> ---------- Original message ---------- >> >>>>>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> >>>>>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:15:59 -0400 >> >>>>>> Subject: Hey Ralph Goodale perhaps you and the RCMP should call >> >>>>>> the >> >>>>>> Yankees Governor Charlie Baker, his lawyer Bob Ross, Rachael >> >>>>>> Rollins >> >>>>>> and this cop Robert Ridge (857 259 9083) ASAP EH Mr Primme >> >>>>>> Minister >> >>>>>> Trudeau the Younger and Donald Trump Jr? >> >>>>>> To: pm@pm.gc.ca, Katie.Telford@pmo-cpm.gc.ca, >> >>>>>> Ian.Shugart@pco-bcp.gc.ca, djtjr@trumporg.com, >> >>>>>> Donald.J.Trump@donaldtrump.com >> >>>>>> Frank.McKenna@td.com, barbara.massey@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> >>>>>> Douglas.Johnson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> >>>>>> washington.field@ic.fbi.gov, Brenda.Lucki@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> >>>>>> gov.press@state.ma.us, bob.ross@state.ma.us, jfurey@nbpower.com, >> >>>>>> jfetzer@d.umn.edu, Newsroom@globeandmail.com, >> sfine@globeandmail.com, >> >>>>>> .Poitras@cbc.ca, steve.murphy@ctv.ca, David.Akin@globalnews.ca, >> >>>>>> Dale.Morgan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, news@kingscorecord.com, >> >>>>>> news@dailygleaner.com, oldmaison@yahoo.com, jbosnitch@gmail.com, >> >>>>>> andre@jafaust.com> >> >>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >>>>>> wharrison@nbpower.com, David.Lametti@parl.gc.ca, >> >>>>>> mcu@justice.gc.ca >> , >> >>>>>> Jody.Wilson-Raybould@parl.gc. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>>>>>> From: "Murray, Charles (Ombud)"<Charles.Murray@gnb.ca> >> >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 18:16:15 +0000 >> >>>>>>> Subject: You wished to speak with me >> >>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> I have the advantage, sir, of having read many of your emails >> >>>>>>> over >> >>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>> years. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> As such, I do not think a phone conversation between us, and >> >>>>>>> specifically one which you might mistakenly assume was in >> >>>>>>> response >> >>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>> your threat of legal action against me, is likely to prove a >> >>>>>>> productive use of either of our time. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> If there is some specific matter about which you wish to >> communicate >> >>>>>>> with me, feel free to email me with the full details and it will >> >>>>>>> be >> >>>>>>> given due consideration. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Sincerely, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Charles Murray >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Ombud NB >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Acting Integrity Commissioner >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> From: Justice Website <JUSTWEB@novascotia.ca> >> >>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:21:11 +0000 >> >>>>>>>> Subject: Emails to Department of Justice and Province of Nova >> >>>>>>>> Scotia >> >>>>>>>> To: "motomaniac333@gmail.com"<motomaniac333@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Mr. Amos, >> >>>>>>>> We acknowledge receipt of your recent emails to the Deputy >> Minister >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> Justice and lawyers within the Legal Services Division of the >> >>>>>>>> Department of Justice respecting a possible claim against the >> >>>>>>>> Province >> >>>>>>>> of Nova Scotia. Service of any documents respecting a legal >> >>>>>>>> claim >> >>>>>>>> against the Province of Nova Scotia may be served on the >> >>>>>>>> Attorney >> >>>>>>>> General at 1690 Hollis Street, Halifax, NS. Please note that we >> >>>>>>>> will >> >>>>>>>> not be responding to further emails on this matter. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Department of Justice >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> On 8/3/17, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> If want something very serious to download and laugh at as well >> >>>>>>>>> Please >> >>>>>>>>> Enjoy and share real wiretap tapes of the mob >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> http://thedavidamosrant. >> >>>>>>>>> ilian.html >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/ >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> As the CBC etc yap about Yankee wiretaps and whistleblowers I >> >>>>>>>>>> must >> >>>>>>>>>> ask them the obvious question AIN'T THEY FORGETTING >> SOMETHING???? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> What the hell does the media think my Yankee lawyer served >> >>>>>>>>>> upon >> >>>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>>> USDOJ right after I ran for and seat in the 39th Parliament >> >>>>>>>>>> baseball >> >>>>>>>>>> cards? >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> http://archive.org/details/ >> >>>>>>>>>> 6 >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> http://davidamos.blogspot.ca/ >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.archive.org/ >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://archive.org/details/ >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> FEDERAL EXPRES February 7, 2006 >> >>>>>>>>>> Senator Arlen Specter >> >>>>>>>>>> United States Senate >> >>>>>>>>>> Committee on the Judiciary >> >>>>>>>>>> 224 Dirksen Senate Office Building >> >>>>>>>>>> Washington, DC 20510 >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Specter: >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I have been asked to forward the enclosed tapes to you from a >> man >> >>>>>>>>>> named, David Amos, a Canadian citizen, in connection with the >> >>>>>>>>>> matters >> >>>>>>>>>> raised in the attached letter. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Mr. Amos has represented to me that these are illegal FBI wire >> >>>>>>>>>> tap >> >>>>>>>>>> tapes. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I believe Mr. Amos has been in contact with you about this >> >>>>>>>>>> previously. >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Very truly yours, >> >>>>>>>>>> Barry A. Bachrach >> >>>>>>>>>> Direct telephone: (508) 926-3403 >> >>>>>>>>>> Direct facsimile: (508) 929-3003 >> >>>>>>>>>> Email: bbachrach@bowditch.com >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>>>>>>>> From: David Amos motomaniac333@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 09:32:09 -0400 >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Attn Integrity Commissioner Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., >> >>>>>>>>> To: coi@gnb.ca >> >>>>>>>>> Cc: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Good Day Sir >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> After I heard you speak on CBC I called your office again and >> >>>>>>>>> managed >> >>>>>>>>> to speak to one of your staff for the first time >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Please find attached the documents I promised to send to the >> >>>>>>>>> lady >> >>>>>>>>> who >> >>>>>>>>> answered the phone this morning. Please notice that not after >> >>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>> Sgt >> >>>>>>>>> at Arms took the documents destined to your office his pal >> >>>>>>>>> Tanker >> >>>>>>>>> Malley barred me in writing with an "English" only document. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> These are the hearings and the dockets in Federal Court that I >> >>>>>>>>> suggested that you study closely. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> This is the docket in Federal Court >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> These are digital recordings of the last three hearings >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Dec 14th https://archive.org/details/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> January 11th, 2016 https://archive.org/details/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> April 3rd, 2017 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> This is the docket in the Federal Court of Appeal >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> http://cas-cdc-www02.cas-satj. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> The only hearing thus far >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> May 24th, 2017 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> https://archive.org/details/ >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> This Judge understnds the meaning of the word Integrity >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Date: 20151223 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Docket: T-1557-15 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Fredericton, New Brunswick, December 23, 2015 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bell >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> BETWEEN: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Plaintiff >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Defendant >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> ORDER >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> (Delivered orally from the Bench in Fredericton, New Brunswick, >> on >> >>>>>>>>> December 14, 2015) >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> The Plaintiff seeks an appeal de novo, by way of motion >> >>>>>>>>> pursuant >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> the Federal Courts Rules (SOR/98-106), from an Order made on >> >>>>>>>>> November >> >>>>>>>>> 12, 2015, in which Prothonotary Morneau struck the Statement of >> >>>>>>>>> Claim >> >>>>>>>>> in its entirety. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> At the outset of the hearing, the Plaintiff brought to my >> >>>>>>>>> attention >> >>>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>>> letter dated September 10, 2004, which he sent to me, in my >> >>>>>>>>> then >> >>>>>>>>> capacity as Past President of the New Brunswick Branch of the >> >>>>>>>>> Canadian >> >>>>>>>>> Bar Association, and the then President of the Branch, Kathleen >> >>>>>>>>> Quigg, >> >>>>>>>>> (now a Justice of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal). In that >> >>>>>>>>> letter >> >>>>>>>>> he stated: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> As for your past President, Mr. Bell, may I suggest that you >> check >> >>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>> work of Frank McKenna before I sue your entire law firm >> >>>>>>>>> including >> >>>>>>>>> you. >> >>>>>>>>> You are your brother’s keeper. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Frank McKenna is the former Premier of New Brunswick and a >> >>>>>>>>> former >> >>>>>>>>> colleague of mine at the law firm of McInnes Cooper. In >> >>>>>>>>> addition >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> expressing an intention to sue me, the Plaintiff refers to a >> >>>>>>>>> number >> >>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> people in his Motion Record who he appears to contend may be >> >>>>>>>>> witnesses >> >>>>>>>>> or potential parties to be added. Those individuals who are >> >>>>>>>>> known >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> me personally, include, but are not limited to the former Prime >> >>>>>>>>> Minister of Canada, The Right Honourable Stephen Harper; former >> >>>>>>>>> Attorney General of Canada and now a Justice of the Manitoba >> Court >> >>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> Queen’s Bench, Vic Toews; former member of Parliament Rob >> >>>>>>>>> Moore; >> >>>>>>>>> former Director of Policing Services, the late Grant Garneau; >> >>>>>>>>> former >> >>>>>>>>> Chief of the Fredericton Police Force, Barry McKnight; former >> >>>>>>>>> Staff >> >>>>>>>>> Sergeant Danny Copp; my former colleagues on the New Brunswick >> >>>>>>>>> Court >> >>>>>>>>> of Appeal, Justices Bradley V. Green and Kathleen Quigg, and, >> >>>>>>>>> retired >> >>>>>>>>> Assistant Commissioner Wayne Lang of the Royal Canadian Mounted >> >>>>>>>>> Police. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> In the circumstances, given the threat in 2004 to sue me in my >> >>>>>>>>> personal capacity and my past and present relationship with >> >>>>>>>>> many >> >>>>>>>>> potential witnesses and/or potential parties to the litigation, >> >>>>>>>>> I >> >>>>>>>>> am >> >>>>>>>>> of the view there would be a reasonable apprehension of bias >> >>>>>>>>> should >> >>>>>>>>> I >> >>>>>>>>> hear this motion. See Justice de Grandpré’s dissenting judgment >> in >> >>>>>>>>> Committee for Justice and Liberty et al v National Energy Board >> et >> >>>>>>>>> al, >> >>>>>>>>> [1978] 1 SCR 369 at p 394 for the applicable test regarding >> >>>>>>>>> allegations of bias. In the circumstances, although neither >> >>>>>>>>> party >> >>>>>>>>> has >> >>>>>>>>> requested I recuse myself, I consider it appropriate that I do >> so. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> AS A RESULT OF MY RECUSAL, THIS COURT ORDERS that the >> >>>>>>>>> Administrator >> >>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> the Court schedule another date for the hearing of the motion. >> >>>>>>>>> There >> >>>>>>>>> is no order as to costs. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> “B. Richard Bell” >> >>>>>>>>> Judge >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Below after the CBC article about your concerns (I made one >> >>>>>>>>> comment >> >>>>>>>>> already) you will find the text of just two of many emails I >> >>>>>>>>> had >> >>>>>>>>> sent >> >>>>>>>>> to your office over the years since I first visited it in 2006. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> I noticed that on July 30, 2009, he was appointed to the the >> >>>>>>>>> Court >> >>>>>>>>> Martial Appeal Court of Canada Perhaps you should scroll to >> >>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>> bottom of this email ASAP and read the entire Paragraph 83 of >> >>>>>>>>> my >> >>>>>>>>> lawsuit now before the Federal Court of Canada? >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> "FYI This is the text of the lawsuit that should interest >> >>>>>>>>> Trudeau >> >>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>> most >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Original message ---------- >> >>>>>>>>> From: justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca >> >>>>>>>>> Date: Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 8:18 PM >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Réponse automatique : RE My complaint against the >> >>>>>>>>> CROWN >> >>>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>>> Federal Court Attn David Hansen and Peter MacKay If you >> >>>>>>>>> planning >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> submit a motion for a publication ban on my complaint trust >> >>>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>>> you >> >>>>>>>>> dudes are way past too late >> >>>>>>>>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Veuillez noter que j'ai changé de courriel. Vous pouvez me >> >>>>>>>>> rejoindre >> >>>>>>>>> à >> >>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Pour rejoindre le bureau de M. Trudeau veuillez envoyer un >> >>>>>>>>> courriel >> >>>>>>>>> à >> >>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Please note that I changed email address, you can reach me at >> >>>>>>>>> lalanthier@hotmail.com >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> To reach the office of Mr. Trudeau please send an email to >> >>>>>>>>> tommy.desfosses@parl.gc.ca >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Thank you, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Merci , >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> http://davidraymondamos3. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> 83. The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in >> more >> >>>>>>>>> war >> >>>>>>>>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and >> >>>>>>>>> reputation >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times >> >>>>>>>>> over >> >>>>>>>>> five years after he began his bragging: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> January 13, 2015 >> >>>>>>>>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The >> >>>>>>>>> Debate >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> December 8, 2014 >> >>>>>>>>> Why Canada Stood Tall! >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Friday, October 3, 2014 >> >>>>>>>>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes >> >>>>>>>>> And >> >>>>>>>>> Stupid Justin Trudeau >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer >> >>>>>>>>> hide >> >>>>>>>>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean >> >>>>>>>>> Chretien >> >>>>>>>>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second >> >>>>>>>>> campaign >> >>>>>>>>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or >> >>>>>>>>> contrary >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were >> >>>>>>>>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. >> >>>>>>>>> There >> >>>>>>>>> were >> >>>>>>>>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the >> >>>>>>>>> dearth >> >>>>>>>>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for >> >>>>>>>>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last >> >>>>>>>>> minute” >> >>>>>>>>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its >> >>>>>>>>> mind. >> >>>>>>>>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would >> not >> >>>>>>>>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a >> >>>>>>>>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan >> cousins >> >>>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it >> was >> >>>>>>>>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. >> >>>>>>>>> But >> >>>>>>>>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister >> >>>>>>>>> Chretien’s >> >>>>>>>>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean >> Chretien’s >> >>>>>>>>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic, >> >>>>>>>>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI >> Battle >> >>>>>>>>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway >> >>>>>>>>> campaign of 2006. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is >> >>>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>>> then >> >>>>>>>>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed >> >>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, >> >>>>>>>>> consent, >> >>>>>>>>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and >> >>>>>>>>> babbling >> >>>>>>>>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the >> >>>>>>>>> deployment >> >>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by >> >>>>>>>>> planners >> >>>>>>>>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a >> >>>>>>>>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins >> >>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to >> >>>>>>>>> war. >> >>>>>>>>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian >> >>>>>>>>> public >> >>>>>>>>> by >> >>>>>>>>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can >> >>>>>>>>> do >> >>>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of >> >>>>>>>>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien >> >>>>>>>>> Government >> >>>>>>>>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in >> >>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons >> >>>>>>>>> regarding >> a >> >>>>>>>>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the >> >>>>>>>>> terror >> >>>>>>>>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed >> >>>>>>>>> state” >> >>>>>>>>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and >> >>>>>>>>> control, >> >>>>>>>>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. >> >>>>>>>>> The >> >>>>>>>>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was >> >>>>>>>>> vital >> >>>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> P.S. Whereas this CBC article is about your opinion of the >> actions >> >>>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>>> the latest Minister Of Health trust that Mr Boudreau and the >> >>>>>>>>> CBC >> >>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>> had my files for many years and the last thing they are is >> >>>>>>>>> ethical. >> >>>>>>>>> Ask his friends Mr Murphy and the RCMP if you don't believe me. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: >> >>>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:02:35 -0400 >> >>>>>>>>> From: "Murphy, Michael B. \(DH/MS\)"MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca >> >>>>>>>>> To: motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> January 30, 2007 >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> WITHOUT PREJUDICE >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Mr. David Amos >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> This will acknowledge receipt of a copy of your e-mail of >> December >> >>>>>>>>> 29, >> >>>>>>>>> 2006 to Corporal Warren McBeath of the RCMP. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Because of the nature of the allegations made in your message, >> >>>>>>>>> I >> >>>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>>> taken the measure of forwarding a copy to Assistant >> >>>>>>>>> Commissioner >> >>>>>>>>> Steve >> >>>>>>>>> Graham of the RCMP “J” Division in Fredericton. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Sincerely, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Honourable Michael B. Murphy >> >>>>>>>>> Minister of Health >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> CM/cb >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Warren McBeath warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca wrote: >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 17:34:53 -0500 >> >>>>>>>>> From: "Warren McBeath"warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> >>>>>>>>> To: kilgoursite@ca.inter.net, MichaelB.Murphy@gnb.ca, >> >>>>>>>>> nada.sarkis@gnb.ca, wally.stiles@gnb.ca, dwatch@web.net, >> >>>>>>>>> motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> >>>>>>>>> CC: ottawa@chuckstrahl.com, >> >>>>>>>>> riding@chuckstrahl.com,John. >> >>>>>>>>> Oda.B@parl.gc.ca,"Bev BUSSON"bev.busson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, >> >>>>>>>>> "Paul Dube"PAUL.DUBE@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Remember me Kilgour? Landslide Annie McLellan has >> >>>>>>>>> forgotten me but the crooks within the RCMP have not >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Dear Mr. Amos, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Thank you for your follow up e-mail to me today. I was on days >> off >> >>>>>>>>> over the holidays and returned to work this evening. Rest >> >>>>>>>>> assured >> >>>>>>>>> I >> >>>>>>>>> was not ignoring or procrastinating to respond to your >> >>>>>>>>> concerns. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> As your attachment sent today refers from Premier Graham, our >> >>>>>>>>> position >> >>>>>>>>> is clear on your dead calf issue: Our forensic labs do not >> process >> >>>>>>>>> testing on animals in cases such as yours, they are referred to >> >>>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>>> Atlantic Veterinary College in Charlottetown who can provide >> these >> >>>>>>>>> services. If you do not choose to utilize their expertise in >> >>>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>>> instance, then that is your decision and nothing more can be >> done. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> As for your other concerns regarding the US Government, false >> >>>>>>>>> imprisonment and Federal Court Dates in the US, etc... it is >> clear >> >>>>>>>>> that Federal authorities are aware of your concerns both in >> Canada >> >>>>>>>>> the US. These issues do not fall into the purvue of Detachment >> >>>>>>>>> and policing in Petitcodiac, NB. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> It was indeed an interesting and informative conversation we >> >>>>>>>>> had >> >>>>>>>>> on >> >>>>>>>>> December 23rd, and I wish you well in all of your future >> >>>>>>>>> endeavors. >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Sincerely, >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Warren McBeath, Cpl. >> >>>>>>>>> GRC Caledonia RCMP >> >>>>>>>>> Traffic Services NCO >> >>>>>>>>> Ph: (506) 387-2222 >> >>>>>>>>> Fax: (506) 387-4622 >> >>>>>>>>> E-mail warren.mcbeath@rcmp-grc.gc.ca >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>>> Alexandre Deschênes, Q.C., >> >>>>>>>>> Office of the Integrity Commissioner >> >>>>>>>>> Edgecombe House, 736 King Street >> >>>>>>>>> Fredericton, N.B. CANADA E3B 5H1 >> >>>>>>>>> tel.: 506-457-7890 >> >>>>>>>>> fax: 506-444-5224 >> >>>>>>>>> e-mail:coi@gnb.ca >> >>>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> http://davidraymondamos3. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Sunday, 19 November 2017 >> >>>>>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Finally Makes The BIG Decision And >> >>>>>>>> Publishes >> >>>>>>>> It Now The Crooks Cannot Take Back Ticket To Try Put My Matter >> >>>>>>>> Before >> >>>>>>>> The Supreme Court >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> https://decisions.fct-cf.gc. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Amos v. Canada >> >>>>>>>> Court (s) Database >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Federal Court of Appeal Decisions >> >>>>>>>> Date >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 2017-10-30 >> >>>>>>>> Neutral citation >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 2017 FCA 213 >> >>>>>>>> File numbers >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> A-48-16 >> >>>>>>>> Date: 20171030 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Docket: A-48-16 >> >>>>>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213 >> >>>>>>>> CORAM: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> WEBB J.A. >> >>>>>>>> NEAR J.A. >> >>>>>>>> GLEASON J.A. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> BETWEEN: >> >>>>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS >> >>>>>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal >> >>>>>>>> (and formally Appellant) >> >>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN >> >>>>>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal >> >>>>>>>> (and formerly Respondent) >> >>>>>>>> Heard at Fredericton, New Brunswick, on May 24, 2017. >> >>>>>>>> Judgment delivered at Ottawa, Ontario, on October 30, 2017. >> >>>>>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> THE COURT >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Date: 20171030 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Docket: A-48-16 >> >>>>>>>> Citation: 2017 FCA 213 >> >>>>>>>> CORAM: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> WEBB J.A. >> >>>>>>>> NEAR J.A. >> >>>>>>>> GLEASON J.A. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> BETWEEN: >> >>>>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS >> >>>>>>>> Respondent on the cross-appeal >> >>>>>>>> (and formally Appellant) >> >>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN >> >>>>>>>> Appellant on the cross-appeal >> >>>>>>>> (and formerly Respondent) >> >>>>>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY THE COURT >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> I. Introduction >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [1] On September 16, 2015, David Raymond Amos (Mr. >> >>>>>>>> Amos) >> >>>>>>>> filed a 53-page Statement of Claim (the Claim) in Federal Court >> >>>>>>>> against Her Majesty the Queen (the Crown). Mr. Amos claims $11 >> >>>>>>>> million >> >>>>>>>> in damages and a public apology from the Prime Minister and >> >>>>>>>> Provincial >> >>>>>>>> Premiers for being illegally barred from accessing parliamentary >> >>>>>>>> properties and seeks a declaration from the Minister of Public >> >>>>>>>> Safety >> >>>>>>>> that the Canadian Government will no longer allow the Royal >> >>>>>>>> Canadian >> >>>>>>>> Mounted Police (RCMP) and Canadian Forces to harass him and his >> >>>>>>>> clan >> >>>>>>>> (Claim at para. 96). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [2] On November 12, 2015 (Docket T-1557-15), by >> >>>>>>>> way >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> motion brought by the Crown, a prothonotary of the Federal Court >> >>>>>>>> (the >> >>>>>>>> Prothonotary) struck the Claim in its entirety, without leave to >> >>>>>>>> amend, on the basis that it was plain and obvious that the Claim >> >>>>>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim, the Claim was fundamentally >> >>>>>>>> vexatious, >> >>>>>>>> and the Claim could not be salvaged by way of further amendment >> >>>>>>>> (the >> >>>>>>>> Prothontary’s Order). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [3] On January 25, 2016 (2016 FC 93), by way of >> >>>>>>>> Mr. >> >>>>>>>> Amos’ appeal from the Prothonotary’s Order, a judge of the >> >>>>>>>> Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court (the Judge), reviewing the matter de novo, struck all of >> >>>>>>>> Mr. >> >>>>>>>> Amos’ claims for relief with the exception of the claim for >> damages >> >>>>>>>> for being barred by the RCMP from the New Brunswick legislature >> >>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>> 2004 (the Federal Court Judgment). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [4] Mr. Amos appealed and the Crown cross-appealed >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> Federal Court Judgment. Further to the issuance of a Notice of >> >>>>>>>> Status >> >>>>>>>> Review, Mr. Amos’ appeal was dismissed for delay on December 19, >> >>>>>>>> 2016. >> >>>>>>>> As such, the only matter before this Court is the Crown’s >> >>>>>>>> cross-appeal. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> II. Preliminary Matter >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [5] Mr. Amos, in his memorandum of fact and law in >> >>>>>>>> relation to the cross-appeal that was filed with this Court on >> >>>>>>>> March >> >>>>>>>> 6, 2017, indicated that several judges of this Court, including >> two >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> the judges of this panel, had a conflict of interest in this >> >>>>>>>> appeal. >> >>>>>>>> This was the first time that he identified the judges whom he >> >>>>>>>> believed >> >>>>>>>> had a conflict of interest in a document that was filed with >> >>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>> Court. In his notice of appeal he had alluded to a conflict with >> >>>>>>>> several judges but did not name those judges. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [6] Mr. Amos was of the view that he did not have >> >>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> identify the judges in any document filed with this Court >> >>>>>>>> because >> >>>>>>>> he >> >>>>>>>> had identified the judges in various documents that had been >> >>>>>>>> filed >> >>>>>>>> with the Federal Court. In his view the Federal Court and the >> >>>>>>>> Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court of Appeal are the same court and therefore any document >> filed >> >>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>> the Federal Court would be filed in this Court. This view is >> >>>>>>>> based >> >>>>>>>> on >> >>>>>>>> subsections 5(4) and 5.1(4) of the Federal Courts Act, R.S.C., >> >>>>>>>> 1985, >> >>>>>>>> c. F-7: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 5(4) Every judge of the Federal Court is, by virtue of his or >> >>>>>>>> her >> >>>>>>>> office, a judge of the Federal Court of Appeal and has all the >> >>>>>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> Appeal. >> >>>>>>>> […] >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 5(4) Les juges de la Cour fédérale sont d’office juges de la >> >>>>>>>> Cour >> >>>>>>>> d’appel fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs >> >>>>>>>> que >> >>>>>>>> les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale. >> >>>>>>>> […] >> >>>>>>>> 5.1(4) Every judge of the Federal Court of Appeal is, by virtue >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> that office, a judge of the Federal Court and has all the >> >>>>>>>> jurisdiction, power and authority of a judge of the Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 5.1(4) Les juges de la Cour d’appel fédérale sont d’office juges >> de >> >>>>>>>> la >> >>>>>>>> Cour fédérale et ont la même compétence et les mêmes pouvoirs >> >>>>>>>> que >> >>>>>>>> les >> >>>>>>>> juges de la Cour fédérale. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [7] However, these subsections only provide that >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> judges of the Federal Court are also judges of this Court (and >> vice >> >>>>>>>> versa). It does not mean that there is only one court. If the >> >>>>>>>> Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court and this Court were one Court, there would be no need for >> >>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>> section. >> >>>>>>>> [8] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act >> >>>>>>>> provide >> >>>>>>>> that: >> >>>>>>>> 3 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court >> >>>>>>>> — Appeal Division is continued under the name “Federal Court of >> >>>>>>>> Appeal” in English and “Cour d’appel fédérale” in French. It is >> >>>>>>>> continued as an additional court of law, equity and admiralty in >> >>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> for Canada, for the better administration of the laws of Canada >> and >> >>>>>>>> as >> >>>>>>>> a superior court of record having civil and criminal >> >>>>>>>> jurisdiction. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 3 La Section d’appel, aussi appelée la Cour d’appel ou la Cour >> >>>>>>>> d’appel >> >>>>>>>> fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée « Cour d’appel fédérale » en >> >>>>>>>> français et « Federal Court of Appeal » en anglais. Elle est >> >>>>>>>> maintenue >> >>>>>>>> à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et d’amirauté >> du >> >>>>>>>> Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit canadien, et >> >>>>>>>> continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives ayant compétence >> >>>>>>>> en >> >>>>>>>> matière civile et pénale. >> >>>>>>>> 4 The division of the Federal Court of Canada called the Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court >> >>>>>>>> — Trial Division is continued under the name “Federal Court” in >> >>>>>>>> English and “Cour fédérale” in French. It is continued as an >> >>>>>>>> additional court of law, equity and admiralty in and for Canada, >> >>>>>>>> for >> >>>>>>>> the better administration of the laws of Canada and as a >> >>>>>>>> superior >> >>>>>>>> court of record having civil and criminal jurisdiction. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 4 La section de la Cour fédérale du Canada, appelée la Section >> >>>>>>>> de >> >>>>>>>> première instance de la Cour fédérale, est maintenue et dénommée >> >>>>>>>> « >> >>>>>>>> Cour fédérale » en français et « Federal Court » en anglais. >> >>>>>>>> Elle >> >>>>>>>> est >> >>>>>>>> maintenue à titre de tribunal additionnel de droit, d’equity et >> >>>>>>>> d’amirauté du Canada, propre à améliorer l’application du droit >> >>>>>>>> canadien, et continue d’être une cour supérieure d’archives >> >>>>>>>> ayant >> >>>>>>>> compétence en matière civile et pénale. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [9] Sections 3 and 4 of the Federal Courts Act >> create >> >>>>>>>> two separate courts – this Court (section 3) and the Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court >> >>>>>>>> (section 4). If, as Mr. Amos suggests, documents filed in the >> >>>>>>>> Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court were automatically also filed in this Court, then there >> would >> >>>>>>>> no >> >>>>>>>> need for the parties to prepare and file appeal books as >> >>>>>>>> required >> >>>>>>>> by >> >>>>>>>> Rules 343 to 345 of the Federal Courts Rules, SOR/98-106 in >> >>>>>>>> relation >> >>>>>>>> to any appeal from a decision of the Federal Court. The >> requirement >> >>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> file an appeal book with this Court in relation to an appeal >> >>>>>>>> from >> a >> >>>>>>>> decision of the Federal Court makes it clear that the only >> >>>>>>>> documents >> >>>>>>>> that will be before this Court are the documents that are part >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> appeal book. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [10] Therefore, the memorandum of fact and law filed >> >>>>>>>> on >> >>>>>>>> March 6, 2017 is the first document, filed with this Court, in >> >>>>>>>> which >> >>>>>>>> Mr. Amos identified the particular judges that he submits have a >> >>>>>>>> conflict in any matter related to him. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [11] On April 3, 2017, Mr. Amos attempted to bring a >> >>>>>>>> motion >> >>>>>>>> before the Federal Court seeking an order “affirming or denying >> the >> >>>>>>>> conflict of interest he has” with a number of judges of the >> Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court. A judge of the Federal Court issued a direction noting >> >>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> if >> >>>>>>>> Mr. Amos was seeking this order in relation to judges of the >> >>>>>>>> Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court of Appeal, it was beyond the jurisdiction of the Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court. >> >>>>>>>> Mr. Amos raised the Federal Court motion at the hearing of this >> >>>>>>>> cross-appeal. The Federal Court motion is not a motion before >> >>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>> Court and, as such, the submissions filed before the Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court >> >>>>>>>> will not be entertained. As well, since this was a motion >> >>>>>>>> brought >> >>>>>>>> before the Federal Court (and not this Court), any documents >> >>>>>>>> filed >> >>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>> relation to that motion are not part of the record of this >> >>>>>>>> Court. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [12] During the hearing of the appeal Mr. Amos alleged >> >>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> the third member of this panel also had a conflict of interest >> >>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> submitted some documents that, in his view, supported his claim >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> conflict. Mr. Amos, following the hearing of his appeal, was >> >>>>>>>> also >> >>>>>>>> afforded the opportunity to provide a brief summary of the >> conflict >> >>>>>>>> that he was alleging and to file additional documents that, in >> >>>>>>>> his >> >>>>>>>> view, supported his allegations. Mr. Amos submitted several >> >>>>>>>> pages >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> documents in relation to the alleged conflicts. He organized the >> >>>>>>>> documents by submitting a copy of the biography of the >> >>>>>>>> particular >> >>>>>>>> judge and then, immediately following that biography, by >> >>>>>>>> including >> >>>>>>>> copies of the documents that, in his view, supported his claim >> that >> >>>>>>>> such judge had a conflict. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [13] The nature of the alleged conflict of Justice >> >>>>>>>> Webb >> >>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>> that before he was appointed as a Judge of the Tax Court of >> >>>>>>>> Canada >> >>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>> 2006, he was a partner with the law firm Patterson Law, and >> >>>>>>>> before >> >>>>>>>> that with Patterson Palmer in Nova Scotia. Mr. Amos submitted >> >>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> he >> >>>>>>>> had a number of disputes with Patterson Palmer and Patterson Law >> >>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> therefore Justice Webb has a conflict simply because he was a >> >>>>>>>> partner >> >>>>>>>> of these firms. Mr. Amos is not alleging that Justice Webb was >> >>>>>>>> personally involved in or had any knowledge of any matter in >> >>>>>>>> which >> >>>>>>>> Mr. >> >>>>>>>> Amos was involved with Justice Webb’s former law firm – only >> >>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> he >> >>>>>>>> was a member of such firm. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [14] During his oral submissions at the hearing of his >> >>>>>>>> appeal Mr. Amos, in relation to the alleged conflict for Justice >> >>>>>>>> Webb, >> >>>>>>>> focused on dealings between himself and a particular lawyer at >> >>>>>>>> Patterson Law. However, none of the documents submitted by Mr. >> Amos >> >>>>>>>> at >> >>>>>>>> the hearing or subsequently related to any dealings with this >> >>>>>>>> particular lawyer nor is it clear when Mr. Amos was dealing with >> >>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>> lawyer. In particular, it is far from clear whether such >> >>>>>>>> dealings >> >>>>>>>> were >> >>>>>>>> after the time that Justice Webb was appointed as a Judge of the >> >>>>>>>> Tax >> >>>>>>>> Court of Canada over 10 years ago. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [15] The documents that he submitted in relation to >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb largely relate to dealings >> >>>>>>>> between >> >>>>>>>> Byron Prior and the St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador office >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> Patterson Palmer, which is not in the same province where >> >>>>>>>> Justice >> >>>>>>>> Webb >> >>>>>>>> practiced law. The only document that indicates any dealing >> between >> >>>>>>>> Mr. Amos and Patterson Palmer is a copy of an affidavit of >> >>>>>>>> Stephen >> >>>>>>>> May >> >>>>>>>> who was a partner in the St. John’s NL office of Patterson >> >>>>>>>> Palmer. >> >>>>>>>> The >> >>>>>>>> affidavit is dated January 24, 2005 and refers to a number of >> >>>>>>>> e-mails >> >>>>>>>> that were sent by Mr. Amos to Stephen May. Mr. Amos also >> >>>>>>>> included >> a >> >>>>>>>> letter that is addressed to four individuals, one of whom is >> >>>>>>>> John >> >>>>>>>> Crosbie who was counsel to the St. John’s NL office of Patterson >> >>>>>>>> Palmer. The letter is dated September 2, 2004 and is addressed >> >>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> “John Crosbie, c/o Greg G. Byrne, Suite 502, 570 Queen Street, >> >>>>>>>> Fredericton, NB E3B 5E3”. In this letter Mr. Amos alludes to a >> >>>>>>>> possible lawsuit against Patterson Palmer. >> >>>>>>>> [16] Mr. Amos’ position is that simply because Justice >> >>>>>>>> Webb >> >>>>>>>> was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer, he now has a conflict. In >> >>>>>>>> Wewaykum >> >>>>>>>> Indian Band v. Her Majesty the Queen, 2003 SCC 45, [2003] 2 >> >>>>>>>> S.C.R. >> >>>>>>>> 259, the Supreme Court of Canada noted that disqualification of >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> judge is to be determined based on whether there is a reasonable >> >>>>>>>> apprehension of bias: >> >>>>>>>> 60 In Canadian law, one standard has now emerged as the >> >>>>>>>> criterion for disqualification. The criterion, as expressed by >> >>>>>>>> de >> >>>>>>>> Grandpré J. in Committee for Justice and Liberty v. National >> Energy >> >>>>>>>> Board, …[[1978] 1 S.C.R. 369, 68 D.L.R. (3d) 716], at p. 394, is >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias: >> >>>>>>>> … the apprehension of bias must be a reasonable one, held by >> >>>>>>>> reasonable and right minded persons, applying themselves to the >> >>>>>>>> question and obtaining thereon the required information. In the >> >>>>>>>> words >> >>>>>>>> of the Court of Appeal, that test is "what would an informed >> >>>>>>>> person, >> >>>>>>>> viewing the matter realistically and practically -- and having >> >>>>>>>> thought >> >>>>>>>> the matter through -- conclude. Would he think that it is more >> >>>>>>>> likely >> >>>>>>>> than not that [the decision-maker], whether consciously or >> >>>>>>>> unconsciously, would not decide fairly." >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [17] The issue to be determined is whether an informed >> >>>>>>>> person, viewing the matter realistically and practically, and >> >>>>>>>> having >> >>>>>>>> thought the matter through, would conclude that Mr. Amos’ >> >>>>>>>> allegations >> >>>>>>>> give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. As this Court >> >>>>>>>> has >> >>>>>>>> previously remarked, “there is a strong presumption that judges >> >>>>>>>> will >> >>>>>>>> administer justice impartially” and this presumption will not be >> >>>>>>>> rebutted in the absence of “convincing evidence” of bias >> >>>>>>>> (Collins >> >>>>>>>> v. >> >>>>>>>> Canada, 2011 FCA 140 at para. 7, [2011] 4 C.T.C. 157 [Collins]. >> See >> >>>>>>>> also R. v. S. (R.D.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 484 at para. 32, 151 >> >>>>>>>> D.L.R. >> >>>>>>>> (4th) 193). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [18] The Ontario Court of Appeal in Rando Drugs Ltd. >> >>>>>>>> v. >> >>>>>>>> Scott, 2007 ONCA 553, 86 O.R. (3d) 653 (leave to appeal to the >> >>>>>>>> Supreme >> >>>>>>>> Court of Canada refused, 32285 (August 1, 2007)), addressed the >> >>>>>>>> particular issue of whether a judge is disqualified from hearing >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> case simply because he had been a member of a law firm that was >> >>>>>>>> involved in the litigation that was now before that judge. The >> >>>>>>>> Ontario >> >>>>>>>> Court of Appeal determined that the judge was not disqualified >> >>>>>>>> if >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> judge had no involvement with the person or the matter when he >> >>>>>>>> was >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> lawyer. The Ontario Court of Appeal also explained that the >> >>>>>>>> rules >> >>>>>>>> for >> >>>>>>>> determining whether a judge is disqualified are different from >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> rules to determine whether a lawyer has a conflict: >> >>>>>>>> 27 Thus, disqualification is not the natural corollary to >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> finding that a trial judge has had some involvement in a case >> >>>>>>>> over >> >>>>>>>> which he or she is now presiding. Where the judge had no >> >>>>>>>> involvement, >> >>>>>>>> as here, it cannot be said that the judge is disqualified. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 28 The point can rightly be made that had Mr. Patterson >> been >> >>>>>>>> asked to represent the appellant as counsel before his >> >>>>>>>> appointment >> >>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> the bench, the conflict rules would likely have prevented him >> >>>>>>>> from >> >>>>>>>> taking the case because his firm had formerly represented one of >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> defendants in the case. Thus, it is argued how is it that as a >> >>>>>>>> trial >> >>>>>>>> judge Patterson J. can hear the case? This issue was considered >> >>>>>>>> by >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> Court of Appeal (Civil Division) in Locabail (U.K.) Ltd. v. >> >>>>>>>> Bayfield >> >>>>>>>> Properties Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 451. The court held, at para. 58, >> that >> >>>>>>>> there is no inflexible rule governing the disqualification of a >> >>>>>>>> judge >> >>>>>>>> and that, "[e]verything depends on the circumstances." >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 29 It seems to me that what appears at first sight to be >> >>>>>>>> an >> >>>>>>>> inconsistency in application of rules can be explained by the >> >>>>>>>> different contexts and in particular, the strong presumption of >> >>>>>>>> judicial impartiality that applies in the context of >> >>>>>>>> disqualification >> >>>>>>>> of a judge. There is no such presumption in cases of allegations >> of >> >>>>>>>> conflict of interest against a lawyer because of a firm's >> >>>>>>>> previous >> >>>>>>>> involvement in the case. To the contrary, as explained by >> >>>>>>>> Sopinka >> >>>>>>>> J. >> >>>>>>>> in MacDonald Estate v. Martin (1990), 77 D.L.R. (4th) 249 >> (S.C.C.), >> >>>>>>>> for sound policy reasons there is a presumption of a >> >>>>>>>> disqualifying >> >>>>>>>> interest that can rarely be overcome. In particular, a >> >>>>>>>> conclusory >> >>>>>>>> statement from the lawyer that he or she had no confidential >> >>>>>>>> information about the case will never be sufficient. The case is >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> opposite where the allegation of bias is made against a trial >> >>>>>>>> judge. >> >>>>>>>> His or her statement that he or she knew nothing about the case >> and >> >>>>>>>> had no involvement in it will ordinarily be accepted at face >> >>>>>>>> value >> >>>>>>>> unless there is good reason to doubt it: see Locabail, at para. >> 19. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 30 That brings me then to consider the particular >> >>>>>>>> circumstances >> >>>>>>>> of this case and whether there are serious grounds to find a >> >>>>>>>> disqualifying conflict of interest in this case. In my view, >> >>>>>>>> there >> >>>>>>>> are >> >>>>>>>> two significant factors that justify the trial judge's decision >> not >> >>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> recuse himself. The first is his statement, which all parties >> >>>>>>>> accept, >> >>>>>>>> that he knew nothing of the case when it was in his former firm >> and >> >>>>>>>> that he had nothing to do with it. The second is the long >> >>>>>>>> passage >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> time. As was said in Wewaykum, at para. 85: >> >>>>>>>> To us, one significant factor stands out, and must >> >>>>>>>> inform >> >>>>>>>> the perspective of the reasonable person assessing the impact of >> >>>>>>>> this >> >>>>>>>> involvement on Binnie J.'s impartiality in the appeals. That >> factor >> >>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>> the passage of time. Most arguments for disqualification rest on >> >>>>>>>> circumstances that are either contemporaneous to the >> >>>>>>>> decision-making, >> >>>>>>>> or that occurred within a short time prior to the >> >>>>>>>> decision-making. >> >>>>>>>> 31 There are other factors that inform the issue. The >> Wilson >> >>>>>>>> Walker firm no longer acted for any of the parties by the time >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> trial. More importantly, at the time of the motion, Patterson J. >> >>>>>>>> had >> >>>>>>>> been a judge for six years and thus had not had a relationship >> with >> >>>>>>>> his former firm for a considerable period of time. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 32 In my view, a reasonable person, viewing the matter >> >>>>>>>> realistically would conclude that the trial judge could deal >> fairly >> >>>>>>>> and impartially with this case. I take this view principally >> >>>>>>>> because >> >>>>>>>> of the long passage of time and the trial judge's lack of >> >>>>>>>> involvement >> >>>>>>>> in or knowledge of the case when the Wilson Walker firm had >> >>>>>>>> carriage. >> >>>>>>>> In these circumstances it cannot be reasonably contended that >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> trial judge could not remain impartial in the case. The mere >> >>>>>>>> fact >> >>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> his name appears on the letterhead of some correspondence from >> over >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> decade ago would not lead a reasonable person to believe that he >> >>>>>>>> would >> >>>>>>>> either consciously or unconsciously favour his former firm's >> former >> >>>>>>>> client. It is simply not realistic to think that a judge would >> >>>>>>>> throw >> >>>>>>>> off his mantle of impartiality, ignore his oath of office and >> >>>>>>>> favour >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> client - about whom he knew nothing - of a firm that he left six >> >>>>>>>> years >> >>>>>>>> earlier and that no longer acts for the client, in a case >> involving >> >>>>>>>> events from over a decade ago. >> >>>>>>>> (emphasis added) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [19] Justice Webb had no involvement with any matter >> >>>>>>>> involving Mr. Amos while he was a member of Patterson Palmer or >> >>>>>>>> Patterson Law, nor does Mr. Amos suggest that he did. Mr. Amos >> made >> >>>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>>> clear during the hearing of this matter that the only reason for >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> alleged conflict for Justice Webb was that he was a member of >> >>>>>>>> Patterson Law and Patterson Palmer. This is simply not enough >> >>>>>>>> for >> >>>>>>>> Justice Webb to be disqualified. Any involvement of Mr. Amos >> >>>>>>>> with >> >>>>>>>> Patterson Law while Justice Webb was a member of that firm would >> >>>>>>>> have >> >>>>>>>> had to occur over 10 years ago and even longer for the time when >> he >> >>>>>>>> was a member of Patterson Palmer. In addition to the lack of any >> >>>>>>>> involvement on his part with any matter or dispute that Mr. Amos >> >>>>>>>> had >> >>>>>>>> with Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer (which in and of itself >> >>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>> sufficient to dispose of this matter), the length of time since >> >>>>>>>> Justice Webb was a member of Patterson Law or Patterson Palmer >> >>>>>>>> would >> >>>>>>>> also result in the same finding – that there is no conflict in >> >>>>>>>> Justice >> >>>>>>>> Webb hearing this appeal. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [20] Similarly in R. v. Bagot, 2000 MBCA 30, 145 Man. >> >>>>>>>> R. >> >>>>>>>> (2d) 260, the Manitoba Court of Appeal found that there was no >> >>>>>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias when a judge, who had been a >> member >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> the law firm that had been retained by the accused, had no >> >>>>>>>> involvement >> >>>>>>>> with the accused while he was a lawyer with that firm. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [21] In Del Zotto v. Minister of National Revenue, >> [2000] >> >>>>>>>> 4 >> >>>>>>>> F.C. 321, 257 N.R. 96, this court did find that there would be a >> >>>>>>>> reasonable apprehension of bias where a judge, who while he was >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> lawyer, had recorded time on a matter involving the same person >> who >> >>>>>>>> was before that judge. However, this case can be distinguished >> >>>>>>>> as >> >>>>>>>> Justice Webb did not have any time recorded on any files >> >>>>>>>> involving >> >>>>>>>> Mr. >> >>>>>>>> Amos while he was a lawyer with Patterson Palmer or Patterson >> >>>>>>>> Law. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [22] Mr. Amos also included with his submissions a CD. >> He >> >>>>>>>> stated in his affidavit dated June 26, 2017 that there is a >> >>>>>>>> “true >> >>>>>>>> copy >> >>>>>>>> of an American police surveillance wiretap entitled 139” on this >> >>>>>>>> CD. >> >>>>>>>> He has also indicated that he has “provided a true copy of the >> >>>>>>>> CD >> >>>>>>>> entitled 139 to many American and Canadian law enforcement >> >>>>>>>> authorities >> >>>>>>>> and not one of the police forces or officers of the court are >> >>>>>>>> willing >> >>>>>>>> to investigate it”. Since he has indicated that this is an >> >>>>>>>> “American >> >>>>>>>> police surveillance wiretap”, this is a matter for the American >> law >> >>>>>>>> enforcement authorities and cannot create, as Mr. Amos suggests, >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> conflict of interest for any judge to whom he provides a copy. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [23] As a result, there is no conflict or reasonable >> >>>>>>>> apprehension of bias for Justice Webb and therefore, no reason >> >>>>>>>> for >> >>>>>>>> him >> >>>>>>>> to recuse himself. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [24] Mr. Amos alleged that Justice Near’s past >> >>>>>>>> professional >> >>>>>>>> experience with the government created a “quasi-conflict” in >> >>>>>>>> deciding >> >>>>>>>> the cross-appeal. Mr. Amos provided no details and Justice Near >> >>>>>>>> confirmed that he had no prior knowledge of the matters alleged >> >>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> Claim. Justice Near sees no reason to recuse himself. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [25] Insofar as it is possible to glean the basis for >> Mr. >> >>>>>>>> Amos’ allegations against Justice Gleason, it appears that he >> >>>>>>>> alleges >> >>>>>>>> that she is incapable of hearing this appeal because he says he >> >>>>>>>> wrote >> >>>>>>>> a letter to Brian Mulroney and Jean Chrétien in 2004. At that >> time, >> >>>>>>>> both Justice Gleason and Mr. Mulroney were partners in the law >> firm >> >>>>>>>> Ogilvy Renault, LLP. The letter in question, which is rude and >> >>>>>>>> angry, >> >>>>>>>> begins with “Hey you two Evil Old Smiling Bastards” and “Re: me >> >>>>>>>> suing >> >>>>>>>> you and your little dogs too”. There is no indication that the >> >>>>>>>> letter >> >>>>>>>> was ever responded to or that a law suit was ever commenced by >> >>>>>>>> Mr. >> >>>>>>>> Amos against Mr. Mulroney. In the circumstances, there is no >> reason >> >>>>>>>> for Justice Gleason to recuse herself as the letter in question >> >>>>>>>> does >> >>>>>>>> not give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> III. Issue >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [26] The issue on the cross-appeal is as follows: Did >> the >> >>>>>>>> Judge err in setting aside the Prothonotary’s Order striking the >> >>>>>>>> Claim >> >>>>>>>> in its entirety without leave to amend and in determining that >> >>>>>>>> Mr. >> >>>>>>>> Amos’ allegation that the RCMP barred him from the New Brunswick >> >>>>>>>> legislature in 2004 was capable of supporting a cause of action? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> IV. Analysis >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> A. Standard of Review >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [27] Following the Judge’s decision to set aside the >> >>>>>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, this Court revisited the standard of >> >>>>>>>> review >> >>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> be applied to discretionary decisions of prothonotaries and >> >>>>>>>> decisions >> >>>>>>>> made by judges on appeals of prothonotaries’ decisions in >> >>>>>>>> Hospira >> >>>>>>>> Healthcare Corp. v. Kennedy Institute of Rheumatology, 2016 FCA >> >>>>>>>> 215, >> >>>>>>>> 402 D.L.R. (4th) 497 [Hospira]. In Hospira, a five-member panel >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> this Court replaced the Aqua-Gem standard of review with that >> >>>>>>>> articulated in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 >> >>>>>>>> S.C.R. >> >>>>>>>> 235 >> >>>>>>>> [Housen]. As a result, it is no longer appropriate for the >> >>>>>>>> Federal >> >>>>>>>> Court to conduct a de novo review of a discretionary order made >> >>>>>>>> by >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> prothonotary in regard to questions vital to the final issue of >> the >> >>>>>>>> case. Rather, a Federal Court judge can only intervene on appeal >> if >> >>>>>>>> the prothonotary made an error of law or a palpable and >> >>>>>>>> overriding >> >>>>>>>> error in determining a question of fact or question of mixed >> >>>>>>>> fact >> >>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> law (Hospira at para. 79). Further, this Court can only >> >>>>>>>> interfere >> >>>>>>>> with >> >>>>>>>> a Federal Court judge’s review of a prothonotary’s discretionary >> >>>>>>>> order >> >>>>>>>> if the judge made an error of law or palpable and overriding >> >>>>>>>> error >> >>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>> determining a question of fact or question of mixed fact and law >> >>>>>>>> (Hospira at paras. 82-83). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [28] In the case at bar, the Judge substituted his own >> >>>>>>>> assessment of Mr. Amos’ Claim for that of the Prothonotary. This >> >>>>>>>> Court >> >>>>>>>> must look to the Prothonotary’s Order to determine whether the >> >>>>>>>> Judge >> >>>>>>>> erred in law or made a palpable and overriding error in choosing >> to >> >>>>>>>> interfere. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> B. Did the Judge err in interfering with the >> >>>>>>>> Prothonotary’s Order? >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [29] The Prothontoary’s Order accepted the following >> >>>>>>>> paragraphs from the Crown’s submissions as the basis for >> >>>>>>>> striking >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> Claim in its entirety without leave to amend: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 17. Within the 96 paragraph Statement of Claim, the >> Plaintiff >> >>>>>>>> addresses his complaint in paragraphs 14-24, inclusive. All but >> >>>>>>>> four >> >>>>>>>> of those paragraphs are dedicated to an incident that occurred >> >>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>> 2006 >> >>>>>>>> in and around the legislature in New Brunswick. The jurisdiction >> of >> >>>>>>>> the Federal Court does not extend to Her Majesty the Queen in >> right >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> the Provinces. In any event, the Plaintiff hasn’t named the >> >>>>>>>> Province >> >>>>>>>> or provincial actors as parties to this action. The incident >> >>>>>>>> alleged >> >>>>>>>> does not give rise to a justiciable cause of action in this >> >>>>>>>> Court. >> >>>>>>>> (…) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> 21. The few paragraphs that directly address the Defendant >> >>>>>>>> provide no details as to the individuals involved or the >> >>>>>>>> location >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> the alleged incidents or other details sufficient to allow the >> >>>>>>>> Defendant to respond. As a result, it is difficult or impossible >> to >> >>>>>>>> determine the causes of action the Plaintiff is attempting to >> >>>>>>>> advance. >> >>>>>>>> A generous reading of the Statement of Claim allows the >> >>>>>>>> Defendant >> >>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> only speculate as to the true and/or intended cause of action. >> >>>>>>>> At >> >>>>>>>> best, the Plaintiff’s action may possibly be summarized as: he >> >>>>>>>> suspects he is barred from the House of Commons. >> >>>>>>>> [footnotes omitted]. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [30] The Judge determined that he could not strike the >> >>>>>>>> Claim >> >>>>>>>> on the same jurisdictional basis as the Prothonotary. The Judge >> >>>>>>>> noted >> >>>>>>>> that the Federal Court has jurisdiction over claims based on the >> >>>>>>>> liability of Federal Crown servants like the RCMP and that the >> >>>>>>>> actors >> >>>>>>>> who barred Mr. Amos from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 >> >>>>>>>> included the RCMP (Federal Court Judgment at para. 23). In >> >>>>>>>> considering >> >>>>>>>> the viability of these allegations de novo, the Judge identified >> >>>>>>>> paragraph 14 of the Claim as containing “some precision” as it >> >>>>>>>> identifies the date of the event and a RCMP officer acting as >> >>>>>>>> Aide-de-Camp to the Lieutenant Governor (Federal Court Judgment >> >>>>>>>> at >> >>>>>>>> para. 27). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [31] The Judge noted that the 2004 event could support >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> cause of action in the tort of misfeasance in public office and >> >>>>>>>> identified the elements of the tort as excerpted from Meigs v. >> >>>>>>>> Canada, >> >>>>>>>> 2013 FC 389, 431 F.T.R. 111: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [13] As in both the cases of Odhavji Estate v Woodhouse, >> >>>>>>>> 2003 >> >>>>>>>> SCC >> >>>>>>>> 69 [Odhavji] and Lewis v Canada, 2012 FC 1514 [Lewis], I must >> >>>>>>>> determine whether the plaintiffs’ statement of claim pleads each >> >>>>>>>> element of the alleged tort of misfeasance in public office: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> a) The public officer must have engaged in deliberate and >> >>>>>>>> unlawful >> >>>>>>>> conduct in his or her capacity as public officer; >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> b) The public officer must have been aware both that his or her >> >>>>>>>> conduct was unlawful and that it was likely to harm the >> >>>>>>>> plaintiff; >> >>>>>>>> and >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> c) There must be an element of bad faith or dishonesty by the >> >>>>>>>> public >> >>>>>>>> officer and knowledge of harm alone is insufficient to conclude >> >>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> a >> >>>>>>>> public officer acted in bad faith or dishonestly. >> >>>>>>>> Odhavji, above, at paras 23, 24 and 28 >> >>>>>>>> (Federal Court Judgment at para. 28). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [32] The Judge determined that Mr. Amos disclosed >> >>>>>>>> sufficient >> >>>>>>>> material facts to meet the elements of the tort of misfeasance >> >>>>>>>> in >> >>>>>>>> public office because the actors, who barred him from the New >> >>>>>>>> Brunswick legislature in 2004, including the RCMP, did so for >> >>>>>>>> “political reasons” (Federal Court Judgment at para. 29). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [33] This Court’s discussion of the sufficiency of >> >>>>>>>> pleadings >> >>>>>>>> in Merchant Law Group v. Canada (Revenue Agency), 2010 FCA 184, >> 321 >> >>>>>>>> D.L.R (4th) 301 is particularly apt: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> …When pleading bad faith or abuse of power, it is not enough to >> >>>>>>>> assert, baldly, conclusory phrases such as “deliberately or >> >>>>>>>> negligently,” “callous disregard,” or “by fraud and theft did >> >>>>>>>> steal”. >> >>>>>>>> “The bare assertion of a conclusion upon which the court is >> >>>>>>>> called >> >>>>>>>> upon to pronounce is not an allegation of material fact”. Making >> >>>>>>>> bald, >> >>>>>>>> conclusory allegations without any evidentiary foundation is an >> >>>>>>>> abuse >> >>>>>>>> of process… >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> To this, I would add that the tort of misfeasance in public >> >>>>>>>> office >> >>>>>>>> requires a particular state of mind of a public officer in >> carrying >> >>>>>>>> out the impunged action, i.e., deliberate conduct which the >> >>>>>>>> public >> >>>>>>>> officer knows to be inconsistent with the obligations of his or >> her >> >>>>>>>> office. For this tort, particularization of the allegations is >> >>>>>>>> mandatory. Rule 181 specifically requires particularization of >> >>>>>>>> allegations of “breach of trust,” “wilful default,” “state of >> >>>>>>>> mind >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> a person,” “malice” or “fraudulent intention.” >> >>>>>>>> (at paras. 34-35, citations omitted). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [34] Applying the Housen standard of review to the >> >>>>>>>> Prothonotary’s Order, we are of the view that the Judge >> >>>>>>>> interfered >> >>>>>>>> absent a legal or palpable and overriding error. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [35] The Prothonotary determined that Mr. Amos’ Claim >> >>>>>>>> disclosed no reasonable claim and was fundamentally vexatious on >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> basis of jurisdictional concerns and the absence of material >> >>>>>>>> facts >> >>>>>>>> to >> >>>>>>>> ground a cause of action. Paragraph 14 of the Claim, which >> >>>>>>>> addresses >> >>>>>>>> the 2004 event, pleads no material facts as to how the RCMP >> officer >> >>>>>>>> engaged in deliberate and unlawful conduct, knew that his or her >> >>>>>>>> conduct was unlawful and likely to harm Mr. Amos, and acted in >> >>>>>>>> bad >> >>>>>>>> faith. While the Claim alleges elsewhere that Mr. Amos was >> >>>>>>>> barred >> >>>>>>>> from >> >>>>>>>> the New Brunswick legislature for political and/or malicious >> >>>>>>>> reasons, >> >>>>>>>> these allegations are not particularized and are directed >> >>>>>>>> against >> >>>>>>>> non-federal actors, such as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the >> Legislative >> >>>>>>>> Assembly of New Brunswick and the Fredericton Police Force. As >> >>>>>>>> such, >> >>>>>>>> the Judge erred in determining that Mr. Amos’ allegation that >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> RCMP >> >>>>>>>> barred him from the New Brunswick legislature in 2004 was >> >>>>>>>> capable >> >>>>>>>> of >> >>>>>>>> supporting a cause of action. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> [36] In our view, the Claim is made up entirely of >> >>>>>>>> bare >> >>>>>>>> allegations, devoid of any detail, such that it discloses no >> >>>>>>>> reasonable cause of action within the jurisdiction of the >> >>>>>>>> Federal >> >>>>>>>> Courts. Therefore, the Judge erred in interfering to set aside >> >>>>>>>> the >> >>>>>>>> Prothonotary’s Order striking the claim in its entirety. >> >>>>>>>> Further, >> >>>>>>>> we >> >>>>>>>> find that the Prothonotary made no error in denying leave to >> amend. >> >>>>>>>> The deficiencies in Mr. Amos’ pleadings are so extensive such >> >>>>>>>> that >> >>>>>>>> amendment could not cure them (see Collins at para. 26). >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> V. Conclusion >> >>>>>>>> [37] For the foregoing reasons, we would allow the >> >>>>>>>> Crown’s >> >>>>>>>> cross-appeal, with costs, setting aside the Federal Court >> Judgment, >> >>>>>>>> dated January 25, 2016 and restoring the Prothonotary’s Order, >> >>>>>>>> dated >> >>>>>>>> November 12, 2015, which struck Mr. Amos’ Claim in its entirety >> >>>>>>>> without leave to amend. >> >>>>>>>> "Wyman W. Webb" >> >>>>>>>> J.A. >> >>>>>>>> "David G. Near" >> >>>>>>>> J.A. >> >>>>>>>> "Mary J.L. Gleason" >> >>>>>>>> J.A. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL >> >>>>>>>> NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> A CROSS-APPEAL FROM AN ORDER OF THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE SOUTHCOTT >> >>>>>>>> DATED >> >>>>>>>> JANUARY 25, 2016; DOCKET NUMBER T-1557-15. >> >>>>>>>> DOCKET: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> A-48-16 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> STYLE OF CAUSE: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> DAVID RAYMOND AMOS v. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> PLACE OF HEARING: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Fredericton, >> >>>>>>>> New Brunswick >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> DATE OF HEARING: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> May 24, 2017 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> WEBB J.A. >> >>>>>>>> NEAR J.A. >> >>>>>>>> GLEASON J.A. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> DATED: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> October 30, 2017 >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> APPEARANCES: >> >>>>>>>> David Raymond Amos >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> For The Appellant / respondent on cross-appeal >> >>>>>>>> (on his own behalf) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> Jan Jensen >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> For The Respondent / appELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> SOLICITORS OF RECORD: >> >>>>>>>> Nathalie G. Drouin >> >>>>>>>> Deputy Attorney General of Canada >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> For The Respondent / APPELLANT ON CROSS-APPEAL >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ---------- Original message ---------- >> >>>>> Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 19:01:11 -0700 (PDT) >> >>>>> From: "David Amos"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com >> >>>>> Subject: Now everybody and his dog knows TJ Burke and his cop >> >>>>> buddies >> >>>>> allegations against me are false and you had the proof all along EH >> >>>>> Chucky? >> >>>>> To: oldmaison@yahoo.com, nbombud@gnb.ca, dan.bussieres@gnb.ca, >> >>>>> jacques_poitras@cbc.ca, news@dailygleaner.com, >> >>>>> kcarmichael@bloomberg.net, advocacycollective@yahoo.com, >> >>>>> Easter.W@parl.gc.ca, Comartin.J@parl.gc.ca, >> >>>>> cityadmin@fredericton.ca >> , >> >>>>> info@gg.ca, bmosher@mosherchedore.ca, rchedore@mosherchedore.ca, >> >>>>> police@fredericton.ca, chebert@thestar.ca, Stoffer.P@parl.gc.ca, >> >>>>> Stronach.B@parl.gc.ca, Matthews.B@parl.gc.ca, >> >>>>> alltrue@nl.rogers.com, >> >>>>> Harper.S@parl.gc.ca, Layton.J@parl.gc.ca, Dryden.K@parl.gc.ca, >> >>>>> Duceppe.G@parl.gc.ca >> >>>>> CC: dgleg@nb.aibn.com, brad.woodside@fredericton.ca, >> >>>>> whalen@fredericton.ca, david.kelly@fredericton.ca, >> >>>>> cathy.maclaggan@fredericton.ca >> >>>>> tom.jellinek@fredericton.ca, scott.mcconaghy@fredericton.ca >> >>>>> marilyn.kerton@fredericton.ca, walter.brown@fredericton.ca, >> >>>>> norah.davidson@fredericton.ca, mike.obrien@fredericton.ca, >> >>>>> bruce.grandy@fredericton.ca, dan.keenan@fredericton.ca, >> >>>>> jeff.mockler@gnb.ca, mrichard@lawsociety-barreau. >> >>>>> cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci. >> >>>>> scotta@parl.gc.ca, michael.bray@gnb.ca, jack.e.mackay@gnb.ca >> >>>>> >> http://www.cbc.ca/canada/new- >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://www.canadaeast.com/ce2/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> http://oldmaison.blogspot.com/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://maritimes.indymedia. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Methinks your liberal pals just made a major faux pas N'est Pas? >> >>>>> Scroll down Frenchie and go down?. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Threat against Burke taken seriously >> >>>>> >> >>>>> By STEPHEN LLEWELLYN >> >>>>> dgleg@nb.aibn.com >> >>>>> Published Thursday May 24th, 2007 >> >>>>> Appeared on page A1 >> >>>>> An RCMP security detail has been guarding Justice Minister and >> >>>>> Attorney General T.J. Burke because of threats made against him >> >>>>> recently. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Burke, the Liberal MLA for Fredericton-Fort Nashwaaksis, wouldn't >> >>>>> explain the nature of the threats. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "I have had a particular individual or individuals who have made >> >>>>> specific overtures about causing harm towards me," he told >> >>>>> reporters >> >>>>> Wednesday. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "The RCMP has provided security to me recently by accompanying me >> >>>>> to >> a >> >>>>> couple of public functions where the individual is known to reside >> >>>>> or >> >>>>> have family members in the area," said Burke. "It is nice to have >> some >> >>>>> added protection and that added comfort." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The RCMP provides protection to the premier and MLAs with its VIP >> >>>>> security >> >>>>> unit. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Burke didn't say when the threat was made but it's believed to have >> >>>>> been in recent weeks. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "When a threat is posed to you and it is a credible threat, you >> >>>>> have >> >>>>> to be cautious about where you go and who you are around," he said. >> >>>>> "But again, I am more concerned about my family as opposed to my >> >>>>> own >> >>>>> personal safety." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Burke said he doesn't feel any differently and he has not changed >> >>>>> his >> >>>>> pattern of activity. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "It doesn't bother me one bit," he said. "It makes my wife feel >> >>>>> awful >> >>>>> nervous." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Burke served in an elite American military unit before becoming a >> >>>>> lawyer and going into politics in New Brunswick. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "(I) have taken my own precautions and what I have to do to ensure >> >>>>> my >> >>>>> family's safety," he said. "I am a very cautious person in general >> due >> >>>>> to my background and training. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "I am comfortable with defending myself or my family if it ever had >> to >> >>>>> happen." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Burke said it is not uncommon for politicians to have security >> >>>>> concerns. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "We do live unfortunately in an age and in a society now where >> threats >> >>>>> have to be taken pretty seriously," he said. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Since the terrorism attacks in the United States on Sept. 11, 2001, >> >>>>> security in New Brunswick has been >> >>>>> beefed up. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Metal detectors were recently installed in the legislature and all >> >>>>> visitors are screened. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The position of attorney general is often referred to as the >> >>>>> province's "top cop." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Burke said sometimes people do not differentiate between his role >> >>>>> as >> >>>>> the manager of the justice system and the individual who actually >> >>>>> prosecutes them. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "With the job sometimes comes threats," he said. "I have had >> >>>>> numerous >> >>>>> threats since Day 1 in office." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Burke said he hopes his First Nations heritage has nothing to do >> >>>>> with >> >>>>> it. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "I think it is more of an issue where people get fixated on a >> >>>>> matter >> >>>>> and they believe you are personally responsible for assigning them >> >>>>> their punishment or their sanction," he said. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Is the threat from someone who was recently incarcerated? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "I probably shouldn't answer that," he replied. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Reporters asked when the threat would be over. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "I don't think a threat ever passes once it has been made," said >> >>>>> Burke. "You have to consider the credibility of the source." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Bruce Fitch, former justice minister in the Conservative >> >>>>> government, >> >>>>> said "every now and again there would be e-mails that were not >> >>>>> complimentary." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "I did have a meeting with the RCMP who are in charge of the >> >>>>> security >> >>>>> of the MLAs and ministers," said Fitch. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "They look at each and every situation." >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Fitch said he never had bodyguards assigned to him although former >> >>>>> premier Bernard Lord and former health minister Elvy Robichaud did >> >>>>> have extra security staff assigned on occasion. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> He said if any MLA felt threatened, he or she would discuss it with >> >>>>> the >> >>>>> RCMP. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> http://www.archive.org/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Small World EH Chucky Leblanc? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "Lafleur, Lou"lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> From: "Lafleur, Lou"lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca >> >>>>> To: "'motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com'"motomaniac_02186@yahoo.com, >> >>>>> "Lafleur, Lou"lou.lafleur@fredericton.ca >> >>>>> Subject: Fredericton Police Force >> >>>>> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 15:21:13 -0300 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Dear Mr. Amos >> >>>>> >> >>>>> My Name is Lou LaFleur and I am a Detective with the Fredericton >> >>>>> Police Major Crime Unit. I would like to talk to you regarding >> >>>>> files >> >>>>> that I am investigating and that you are alleged to have >> >>>>> involvement >> >>>>> in. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Please call me at your earliest convenience and leave a message and >> >>>>> a >> >>>>> phone number on my secure and confidential line if I am not in my >> >>>>> office. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> yours truly, >> >>>>> Cpl. Lou LaFleur >> >>>>> Fredericton Police Force >> >>>>> 311 Queen St. >> >>>>> Fredericton, NB >> >>>>> 506-460-2332 >> >>>>> ______________________________ >> >>>>> This electronic mail, including any attachments, is confidential >> >>>>> and >> >>>>> is for the sole use of the intended recipient and may be >> >>>>> privileged. >> >>>>> Any unauthorized distribution, copying, disclosure or review is >> >>>>> prohibited. Neither communication over the Internet nor disclosure >> >>>>> to >> >>>>> anyone other than the intended recipient constitutes waiver of >> >>>>> privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, please >> >>>>> immediately >> >>>>> notify the sender and then delete this communication and any >> >>>>> attachments from your computer system and records without saving or >> >>>>> forwarding it. Thank you. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> On 12/21/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > PUBLIC ORDER EMERGENCY COMMISSION > > B E T W E E N : > > FREEDOM CORP. ET AL > Applicants/Moving Parties > > - and - > > HIS MAJESTY THE KING IN RIGHT OF CANADA > and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA > Respondents/Responding Parties > > FINAL WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF FREEDOM CORP. ET AL – RELEASED > IMMEDIATELY AFTER FILING TO FEDERAL PARLIAMENTARIANS, THE CANADIAN > PUBLIC, AND THE CANADIAN AND FOREIGN MEDIA > > December 9, 2022 Foster LLP > > 2100, 520 – 5th Avenue SW > Calgary, Alberta T2P 3R7 > Tel: (403) 261-5333 > Fax: (403) 266-4741 > Brendan M. Miller & Bath-Sheba > van den Berg > Barristers and Solicitors > bmiller@fosterllp.ca > bsvandenberg@fosterllp.ca > File No. 450261 > > Wilson Law Office > Suite 195, 3-1 Bellerose Drive > St. Alberta, Alberta T8N 5C9 > Keith Wilson, K.C. > keith@wilsonlawoffices.ca > & Eva Chipiuk > Eva@chipiuk-law.ca > Acting in Capacity as Solicitors Only > Counsel for Freedom Corp. et al > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Sean Tiessen <stiessen1979@gmail.com> > Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 06:26:30 -0800 > Subject: Re: "The VERY corrupt cop ClaudeTremblay just wished me a > Merry Xmass??? BAH HUMBUG" > To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > > David, > > Long time no talk. > > As I know how much you live reading this type of thing... dig in!! > > Let me know what you think. Feel free to share.... widely. > > Thx > Merry Christmas > > Sean > > On Tue., Dec. 20, 2022, 1:27 p.m. David Amos, < > david.raymond.amos333@gmail. > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Blogger <no-reply@google.com> >> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 20:43:59 +0000 >> Subject: Your post titled "The VERY corrupt cop ClaudeTremblay just >> wished me a Merry Xmass??? BAH HUMBUG" has been put behind a warning >> for readers >> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> >> Hello, >> >> As you may know, our Community Guidelines >> (https://blogger.com/go/ >> we >> allow-- and don't allow-- on Blogger. Your post titled "The VERY corrupt >> cop ClaudeTremblay just wished me a Merry Xmass??? BAH HUMBUG" was >> flagged >> to us for review. This post was put behind a warning for readers because >> it >> contains sensitive content; the post is visible at >> >> http://davidraymondamos3. >> . >> Your blog readers must acknowledge the warning before being able to read >> the post/blog. >> >> Why was your blog post put behind a warning for readers? >> Your content has been evaluated according to our Adult Content >> policy. >> Please visit our Community Guidelines page linked in this email to learn >> more. >> >> We apply warning messages to posts that contain sensitive content. >> If >> you are interested in having the status reviewed, please update the >> content >> to adhere to Blogger's Community Guidelines. Once the content is updated, >> you may republish it at >> >> https://www.blogger.com/go/ >> . >> This will trigger a review of the post. >> >> For more information, please review the following resources: >> >> Terms of Service: https://www.blogger.com/go/ >> Blogger Community Guidelines: https://blogger.com/go/ >> >> Sincerely, >> >> The Blogger Team >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: Blogger <no-reply@google.com> >> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 07:02:05 +0000 >> Subject: Your post titled "MARCO MENDICINO PUBLIC ORDER EMERGENCY >> COMMISSION INQUIRY Day 28 - November 22, 2022" has been reinstated >> To: david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> Hello, >> >> We have re-evaluated the post titled "MARCO MENDICINO PUBLIC ORDER >> EMERGENCY COMMISSION INQUIRY Day 28 - November 22, 2022" against >> Community >> Guidelines https://blogger.com/go/ >> has >> been reinstated. You may access the post at >> >> http://davidraymondamos3. >> . >> >> Sincerely, >> >> The Blogger Team >> > > On 2/20/22, David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: LeanneMB <LeanneMB@protonmail.com> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 15:39:48 +0000 >> Subject: Convoy demands >> To: "david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> Sent from ProtonMail for iOS >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Barron, Lisa Marie - M.P."<lisamarie.barron@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> This automated response is to assure you that your message has been >> received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible. Please >> note that constituents of Nanaimo-Ladysmith have priority. Be sure to >> include your home address or postal code if you are a resident of >> Nanaimo-Ladysmith. >> >> If you are not a local resident, please contact your MP’s office for >> assistance. You can enter your postal code here >> https://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> your neighbourhood. >> >> Due to the overwhelming volume of correspondence received and our >> limited capacity, we may not be able to respond personally to your >> inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, forwarded items and links to >> articles will not receive a response. If you have any questions >> regarding the status of your correspondence, please do not hesitate to >> follow up with my office. >> >> If you live in Nanaimo-Ladysmith and the information you have sent is >> about a concern or problem with a federal government ministry or >> agency, please make sure that you have included your full name, >> address, telephone number and the particulars regarding your case so >> we can respond and assist you more efficiently. >> >> Thank you again for taking the time to share your views. >> >> Services & Assistance >> >> When you contact my community office, my team and I will do everything >> we can to assist you. Your confidentiality is respected at all times. >> To give you a better idea of how we can help, please review the >> information below. >> >> What my Community Office can help you with: >> >> * Provide information on locating government services and contact >> information >> * Assist in understanding government policies and services >> * Assist in navigating through government bureaucracy >> * Ensure due process is being followed >> * Attend community events >> * Advocate on behalf of the community to government >> * Provide congratulatory and greeting messages >> * Provide government documents, legislation discussion papers and >> other web-based forms if you don't have internet access >> * Resolve issues you may be having with federal ministries or >> agencies >> >> We can help you if: >> >> * You are a resident of the Nanaimo-Ladysmith constituency >> * Your matter is with the Federal government >> >> We are unable to: >> >> * Offer legal advice or assist with legal action >> * Influence processes set up in law to be independent of Parliament >> * Change the time limits for filing appeals >> * Make inquiries about police investigations. If you have a >> complaint about police conduct, please direct them to the Office of >> the Police Complaints Commissioner. >> >> In addition, while we are not able to take on casework that is >> provincial or municipal in nature, we can help direct you to the >> people who can assist you. >> >> If you would like more information regarding federal government >> services and assistance available, please go to >> https://www.canada.ca/en/ >> or call toll free 1-800-622-6232 for more information. >> >> Thanks again for writing. >> >> Warmly, >> >> Lisa Marie Barron >> >> Member of Parliament Elect for Nanaimo Ladysmith >> >> 250 734 6400 >> >> >> With respect and gratitude, the Nanaimo-Ladysmith riding is located on >> the traditional territories of the Snuneymuxw, Snaw Naw As, >> Stz`minus, and Lyackson First Nations. >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Cannings, Richard - M.P."<Richard.Cannings@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> *Do not reply to this email* >> >> Thank you very much for your e-mail and please be assured that I have >> taken note of your concerns and expressed views. Please be assured >> that this e-mail is monitored and while my staff and I read all >> correspondence, the volume of emails we receive means that some form >> letter campaigns and non-critic/non-riding correspondence may not >> receive a direct response. >> >> in the event that you require immediate assistance while our office is >> closed, I have provided the following list of contact numbers for your >> use. >> >> Service Canada: 1-800-622-6232 / >> www.canadabenefits.gc.ca<http: >> Global Affairs (International Consular Assistance): 1-800-267-8376, >> sos@international.gc.ca< >> >> Old Age Security (OAS): 1-800-277-9914 >> Canada Pension Plan (CPP): 1-800-227-9914 >> Employment Insurance (EI): 1-800-206-7218 >> Canada Revenue Agency (CRA): 1-800-959-8281 >> Citizenship and Immigration: 1-888-242-2100 >> Passport Canada: 1-800-567-6868 >> Veterans Affairs Canada: 1-866-522-2122 >> >> Provincial >> Service BC: 1-800-663-7867 >> Tenant Information Line: 1-800-665-1185 >> BC 211: Dial 211 or visit www.bc211.ca<http://www.bc211. >> connected to community, social and government resources. >> Legal Aid BC: 1-888-601-6076 >> >> Again, thank you very much for reaching out and I appreciate hearing from >> you. >> >> Please be assured that all e-mails sent to this office are treated as >> confidential. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Richard Cannings, MP >> South Okanagan-West Kootenay >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Wagantall, Cathay - M.P."<Cathay.Wagantall@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> Thank you for contacting the office of Cathay Wagantall, Member of >> Parliament for Yorkton-Melville, Saskatchewan. This is an automated >> response to acknowledge receipt of your email. >> MP Wagantall welcomes hearing from constituents on issues that are >> important to them. Priority will be given to Yorkton-Melville >> residents, so please include your mailing address and phone number in >> your email. If you are unsure, you can determine who your MP is by >> entering your postal code at https://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> For constituents with an urgent matter, please call the constituency >> office in Yorkton at 306-782-3309<tel:306-782-3309> or 1.800.667.6606 >> for assistance, Monday-Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. >> Stay up to date with your MP’s work in Ottawa and in the Constituency >> by signing up for her e-newsletter >> here<https://www. >> Please note: my office will not respond to messages directed to >> another person or organization, or to correspondence containing >> offensive or abusive language. >> Due to the large volume of letters my office receives, form letters >> from mass email senders are welcome, but will not receive a reply. >> However, topics tracked and brought to the Member’s attention each >> week. >> Again, thank you for taking the time to contact MP Wagantall. >> >> >> Sincerely, >> Cathay Wagantall >> Member of Parliament >> Yorkton-Melville >> FACEBOOK<https://www.facebook. >> YOUTUBE<https://www.youtube. >> | TWITTER<https://twitter.com/ >> INSTAGRAM<http://www. >> >> CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO CATHAY’S MONTHLY >> E-NEWSLETTER!<https://www. >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Bachrach, Taylor - M.P."<Taylor.Bachrach@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> Sent from the office of Taylor Bachrach, MP >> >> Thank you for your email and for taking the time to contact me and >> express your views. >> >> This automatic response is to let you know that I have received your >> message. I regularly review all communications sent to me, however, >> due to the high volume of emails received I may not be able to respond >> personally to each one. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded >> items will not receive a response. Every effort will be made to reply >> to you as soon as possible. >> >> Please note: due to much higher than normal levels of correspondence, >> our response time for non-urgent requests has temporarily increased. >> It may take several weeks for you to receive a response to your >> inquiry. Urgent requests will be given first priority. We apologize >> for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding. >> >> If you are a resident of the Skeena-Bulkley Valley constituency and >> your concerns are with a federal government ministry or agency, we >> would be happy to look into the matter for you and assist to the best >> of our ability. Please ensure that you have included your full name, >> address, postal code, telephone number, and the details of your >> situation so my office is able to assist you efficiently. If the >> matter is time-sensitive, please call my office directly at >> 1-888-622-0212. If we are unable to answer your call immediately, >> please leave a voicemail and we will return your call at our earliest >> opportunity. >> >> If you are not sure if you live within the Skeena-Bulkley Valley >> constituency, you can check by entering your postal code here: >> http://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> >> Thank you again for your email, and for taking the time to share your >> thoughts and concerns with me. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Taylor Bachrach, Member of Parliament >> Skeena-Bulkley Valley >> 1-888-622-0212 >> taylorbachrach.ndp.ca<http:// >> taylor.bachrach@parl.gc.ca< >> UFCW 232 >> >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Collins, Laurel - M.P."<Laurel.Collins@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> This automated response is to assure you that your message has been >> received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible. Please >> note that constituents of Victoria and correspondence related to my >> role as Critic of the Environment and Climate Change have priority. Be >> sure to include your home address or postal code if you are a resident >> of Victoria. >> >> If you are not a local resident, please contact your MP’s office for >> assistance.You can enter your postal code here >> https://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> your neighbourhood. >> >> If you are writing to Laurel with a media request regarding her role >> as the Member of Parliament for Victoria, please direct your request >> to nadia.hamdon.841@parl.gc.ca >> >> If you are writing to Laurel with a media request regarding her role >> as Critic of the Environment and Climate Change, please direct your >> request to >> alicia.tiffin.841@parl.gc.ca< >> >> Our office will respond to direct inquiries from constituents. >> However, due to the overwhelming volume of correspondence received and >> our limited capacity, there may be a delay in response time and we may >> not be able to respond personally to all emails. In most cases, >> anonymous, cc'd, forwarded items and links to articles will not >> receive a response. If you have any questions regarding the status of >> your correspondence, please do not hesitate to follow up with my >> office. >> >> If you live in Victoria and the information you have sent is about a >> concern or problem with a federal government ministry or agency, >> please make sure that you have included your full name, address, >> telephone number and the particulars regarding your case so we can >> respond and assist you more efficiently. >> >> Thank you again for taking the time to share your views. >> >> Services & Assistance >> When you contact my community office, my staff and I will do >> everything we can to assist you. Your confidentiality is respected at >> all times. To give you a better idea of how we can help, please review >> the information below. >> >> What my Community Office can help you with: >> • Provide information on locating government services and >> contact information >> • Assist in understanding government policies and services >> • Assist in navigating through government bureaucracy >> • Ensure due process is being followed >> • Attend community events >> • Advocate on behalf of the community to government >> • Provide congratulatory and greeting messages >> • Provide government documents, legislation discussion >> papers and other web-based forms if you don't have internet access >> • Resolve issues you may be having with federal ministries or >> agencies >> >> We can help you if: >> • You are a resident of the Victoria constituency >> • Your matter is with the Federal government >> >> We are unable to: >> • Offer legal advice or assist with legal action >> • Influence processes set up in law to be independent of >> Parliament >> • Change the time limits for filing appeals >> • Make inquiries about police investigations. If you have a >> complaint about police conduct, please direct them to the Office of >> the Police Complaints Commissioner. >> >> In addition, while we are not able to take on casework that is >> provincial or municipal in nature, we can help direct you to the >> people who can assist you. >> >> If you would like more information regarding federal government >> services and assistance available, please go to >> https://www.canada.ca/en/ >> or call toll free 1-800-622-6232 for more information. >> >> Thanks again for writing. >> >> Warmly, >> >> Laurel >> Member of Parliament for Victoria >> >> Community Office of Laurel Collins >> 1057 Fort Street >> Victoria BC V8V 3K5 >> 1-250-363-3600 >> >> Parliamentary Office of Laurel Collins >> Confederation Building, Suite 518 >> Parliament Hill >> Ottawa ON K1A 0A6 >> 1-613-996-2358 >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "MacGregor, Alistair - M.P."<Alistair.MacGregor@parl.gc.ca >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> Sent from the office of Alistair MacGregor, MP >> Thank you for your email and for taking the time to contact me and >> express your views. >> This automatic response is to let you know that I have received your >> message. I regularly review all communications sent to me, however, >> due to the high volume of emails received I may not be able to respond >> personally to each one. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, and forwarded >> items will not receive a response. Every effort will be made to reply >> to you as soon as possible. >> If you are a resident of the Cowichan-Malahat-Langford constituency >> and your concerns are with a federal government ministry or agency, we >> would be happy to look into the matter for you and assist to the best >> of our ability. Please ensure that you have included your full name, >> address, postal code, telephone number, and the details of your >> situation so my office is able to assist you efficiently. If the >> matter is time-sensitive, please call my office directly at >> 1-866-609-9998. If we are unable to answer your call immediately, >> please leave a voicemail and we will return your call at our earliest >> opportunity. >> If you are not sure if you live within the Cowichan-Malahat-Langford >> constituency, you can check by entering your postal code here: >> http://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> >> Thank you again for your email, and for taking the time to share your >> thoughts and concerns with me. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Alistair MacGregor, Member of Parliament >> Cowichan-Malahat-Langford >> 1-866-609-9998 >> alistairmacgregor.ca >> alistair.macgregor@parl.gc.ca< >> >> UFCW 232 >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Johns, Gord - M.P."<Gord.Johns@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> Hello! >> Thank you for taking the time to write. It's always great to hear from >> my constituents. This automated reply is being sent so that you know >> that your message has been received. Messages sent to this office are >> reviewed daily but the volume of emails means that not every message >> will receive an immediate or individual reply. >> Constituent issues requiring time-sensitive attention will be given >> priority and every effort will be made to reply to you in a timely >> fashion. If you are a constituent and need assistance with a >> federally-delivered service or federal government agency, please make >> sure you have included your full name, phone number, street address >> and postal code. Be assured that all correspondence sent to my office >> is treated as confidential. >> You can also contact my community offices directly: 1-844-620-9924 >> To contact the office of a Department, please call the House of >> Commons General Inquiries line: 1-866-599-4999 >> If you live outside Courtenay—Alberni, please contact your local MP >> office for assistance. If you aren't sure what riding you live in, go >> to: https://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> Best Regards, >> Gord Johns, MP Courtenay—Alberni http://gordjohns.ndp.ca/ >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Mathyssen, Lindsay - M.P."<Lindsay.Mathyssen@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> Thank you for your email and for taking the time to contact the office >> of MP Lindsay Mathyssen to express your views. >> This automatic response is to let you know that we have received your >> message. >> For the most up to date information on Canada’s response to COVID-19 >> as well as information on financial assistance and travel restrictions >> please visit: https://www.canada.ca/en.html >> Please note: Our office is now re-open to the public but due to >> provincial COVID-19 guidelines, we cannot host large numbers of >> visitors so please call before visiting, if possible. Staff continue >> to work on your behalf, but no in-person meetings will be scheduled at >> this time and please be assured that all emails will be responded to >> as soon as we are able. If you are a constituent living in >> London-Fanshawe, you can always contact our office by phone at >> 519-685-4745. We will return your call and respond to your inquiries >> as soon as we can. >> Due to much higher than normal levels of correspondence, our response >> time for non-urgent requests has temporarily increased. Form letter >> campaigns, anonymous or cc’ed emails may not receive an immediate >> response, but we will try to respond as quickly as possible. >> Thank you again for writing, and please be assured that all emails >> sent to my office is treated as confidential. >> ______________________________ >> Bonjour. Nous accusons réception de votre message et vous remercions >> d’avoir écrit au bureau de la députée Lindsay Mathyssen. Ceci est une >> réponse automatique. >> Pour des renseignements à jour sur la réponse du Canada à la COVID-19, >> l’aide financière et les restrictions de voyage, consultez >> https://www.canada.ca/fr.html. >> Veuillez noter que notre bureau est fermé en raison de la pandémie de >> COVID-19. Notre personnel continue de travailler pour vous, mais nous >> ne pouvons organiser de rencontre en personne pour l’instant. Sachez >> cependant que tous les courriels sont acheminés à qui de droit et que >> vous pouvez toujours nous contacter par téléphone au 519-685-4745. >> Comme nous recevons beaucoup plus de correspondance qu’en temps >> normal, les délais de réponse aux demandes non urgentes sont plus >> longs. Notre priorité va aux courriels urgents venant des habitants de >> la circonscription de London-Fanshawe ou portant sur les >> responsabilités essentielles de Mme Mathyssen. >> Il se pourrait que nous ne répondions pas directement aux campagnes de >> lettres, aux courriels anonymes, aux courriels envoyés en copie >> conforme (c.c.) et à la correspondance ne portant pas sur des >> questions essentielles ou relatives à la circonscription. Il pourrait >> s’écouler plusieurs semaines avant que nous puissions y répondre. >> Nous vous remercions de nous avoir écrit et sachez que tous les >> courriels envoyés à mon bureau sont traités confidentiellement. >> >> Lindsay Mathyssen >> >> Member of Parliament >> London-Fanshawe >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Zarrillo, Bonita - M.P."<bonita.zarrillo@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> This automated response is to assure you that your message has been >> received by my office and will be reviewed as soon as possible. Please >> note that constituents of Port Moody – Coquitlam, Anmore or Belcarra >> have priority. Be sure to include your home address or postal code if >> you are a resident of Port Moody – Coquitlam, Anmore or Belcarra. If >> you are not a local resident, please contact your MP’s office for >> assistance. You can enter your postal code here >> https://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> your neighbourhood. >> Due to the overwhelming volume of correspondence received and our >> limited capacity, we may not be able to respond personally to your >> inquiry. In most cases, anonymous, cc'd, forwarded items and links to >> articles will not receive a response. If you have any questions >> regarding the status of your correspondence, please do not hesitate to >> follow up with my office. >> If you live in Port Moody – Coquitlam, Anmore or Belcarra and the >> information you have sent is about a concern or problem with a federal >> government ministry or agency, please make sure that you have included >> your full name, address, telephone number and the particulars >> regarding your case so we can respond and assist you more efficiently. >> Thank you again for taking the time to share your views. >> Services & Assistance >> When you contact my community office, my staff and I will do >> everything we can to assist you. Your confidentiality is respected at >> all times. To give you a better idea of how we can help, please review >> the information below. >> What my Community Office can help you with: >> • Provide information on locating government services and >> contact information >> • Assist in understanding government policies and services >> • Assist in navigating through government bureaucracy >> • Ensure due process is being followed >> • Attend community events >> • Advocate on behalf of the community to government >> • Provide congratulatory and greeting messages >> • Provide government documents, legislation discussion >> papers and other web-based forms if you don't have internet access >> • Resolve issues you may be having with federal ministries or >> agencies >> We can help you if: >> • You are a resident of the Port Moody – Coquitlam constituency >> • Your matter is with the Federal government >> We are unable to: >> • Offer legal advice or assist with legal action >> • Influence processes set up in law to be independent of >> Parliament >> • Change the time limits for filing appeals >> • Make inquiries about police investigations. If you have a >> complaint about police conduct, please direct them to the Office of >> the Police Complaints Commissioner. >> In addition, while we are not able to take on casework that is >> provincial or municipal in nature, we can help direct you to the >> people who can assist you. >> If you would like more information regarding federal government >> services and assistance available, please go to >> https://www.canada.ca/en/ >> or call toll free 1-800-622-6232 for more information. >> Thanks again for writing. >> Respectfully, >> Bonita Zarrillo >> Member of Parliament Port Moody – Coquitlam >> Telephone: 604-664-9229 >> Fax: 604-664-9231 >> I respectfully acknowledge the Port Moody – Coquitlam riding is >> located on the unceded and traditional territory of the Halq'eméylem >> speaking Coast Salish peoples. This includes the nations of >> kʷikʷəƛw̓əm (Kwikwetlem), Katzie, and Tsleil-Waututh. >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Blaney, Rachel - M.P."<Rachel.Blaney@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> *Please do not reply to this email* >> >> Hello, thank you for contacting the office of Rachel Blaney, Member of >> Parliament for North Island - Powell River. This automated reply is to >> assure you that your message has been received by our office and will >> be reviewed as soon as possible. >> >> I want to thank you for taking the time to reach out and express your >> views. While all correspondence is read, the volume of emails we >> receive means that we are not able to respond immediately to every >> message. Every effort will be made to reply to you as soon as >> possible. Please note that in most cases, anonymous, cc’d or forwarded >> items will be read but will not receive a response. Constituents of >> North Island - Powell River and correspondence related to my roles as >> Critic of Seniors, Veterans, and Rural Economic Development have >> priority. If the information you have sent is about a concern that you >> have as a constituent, please make sure that you have given your full >> name, postal code and telephone number so that my office is able to >> assist you efficiently. >> >> You can ensure you are contacting the correct MP by entering your >> postal code at this website: https://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> >> Should you need further assistance, you can contact my constituency >> offices at 1-250-287-9388 (Campbell River) and 1-604-489-2286 (Powell >> River). >> >> Please be assured that all email sent to this office is treated as >> confidential. >> >> Thanks again for reaching out. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Rachel Blaney, MP >> (North Island - Powell River) >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: "Davies, Don - M.P."<don.davies@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and >> Freeland defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> *Do not reply to this email* >> >> Greetings! >> >> I acknowledge receipt of your email. Thank you for taking the time to >> contact me and express your views. >> >> Due to the current COVID-19 situation, please be advised that my >> Vancouver Kingsway constituency office will be conducting all business >> by phone and online communication until further notice. >> >> Our goal is to keep constituents and staff safe, while continuing to >> provide the important services that community members depend on. >> >> While I read all correspondence, the volume of email we receive means >> that I am not able to respond immediately to every message. Every >> effort will be made to reply to you as soon as possible. Please note >> that in most cases, anonymous, cc’d or forwarded items will be read >> but will not receive a response. >> >> If the information you have sent is about a concern that you have as a >> constituent, please make sure that you have given your full name, >> address and telephone number so my office is able to assist you >> efficiently. If you live outside Vancouver Kingsway please contact >> your own Member of Parliament for assistance. >> >> You can ensure you are contacting the correct MP by entering your >> postal code at this website: https://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> >> Please be assured that all email sent to this office is treated as >> confidential. >> >> Should you need further assistance, please contact my office at >> 604-775-6263. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Don Davies, MP >> Vancouver Kingsway >> >> >> *Ne répondre pas à ce courriel* >> >> Bonjour, >> >> J’accuse réception de votre courriel. Je vous remercie d’avoir pris le >> temps de communiquer avec moi et d’exprimer vos opinions. >> >> Alors que la situation du COVID-19 continue d'évoluer, mon bureau de >> circonscription de Vancouver Kingsway aidera avec toutes les affaires >> par téléphone et par communication en ligne jusqu'à nouvel avis. >> >> Notre objectif est d'assurer la sécurité des électeurs et du >> personnel, tout en continuant à fournir les services importants dont >> dépendent les membres de la communauté. >> >> Je tiens à vous assurer que je lis tous les messages qui me sont >> envoyés. Toutefois, le grand nombre de courriels que mon bureau reçoit >> fait en sorte que je ne suis pas en mesure de répondre immédiatement à >> chaque message. Tous les efforts seront déployés pour vous répondre >> dès que possible. Veuillez prendre note que, dans la plupart des cas, >> les messages anonymes, transmis en copie conforme ou transférés seront >> lus, mais qu’aucune réponse ne sera envoyée. >> >> Si les informations que vous m’avez transmises concernent un problème >> en particulier et que vous êtes un citoyen de la circonscription, >> assurez-vous d’avoir indiqué votre nom au complet, votre adresse et >> votre numéro de téléphone pour que mon bureau puisse vous aider >> efficacement. Si vous n’êtes pas un résident de Vancouver Kingsway, >> veuillez communiquer avec le député de votre circonscription pour >> obtenir de l’aide. >> >> Vous pouvez vous assurer de communiquer avec le bon député en entrant >> votre code postal sur cette page Web : >> https://www.ourcommons.ca/ >> >> Soyez assuré que tous les courriels envoyés à mon bureau sont traités >> en toute confidentialité. >> >> Si vous avez besoin d’aide, veuillez téléphoner à mon bureau : >> 604-775-6263. >> >> Je vous prie d’accepter l’expression de mes sentiments distingués. >> >> Don Davies, député à la Chambre des communes >> Vancouver Kingsway >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message -------------- >> From: "Julian, Peter - M.P."<peter.julian@parl.gc.ca> >> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 02:29:26 +0000 >> Subject: Thank you for contacting our Parliament Hill office / Merci >> d’avoir contacté notre bureau parlementaire >> To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> >> On behalf of Peter Julian, Member of Parliament (New >> Westminster-Burnaby), we would like to thank you for contacting our >> office. Peter always welcomes and appreciates receiving your comments >> and suggestions, which are helpful to his work in both Canada’s >> Parliament and in the Riding. >> We want to assure you that your email has been received, will be >> reviewed as soon as possible and acted upon should it be required. Due >> to the high volume of electronic mail received, messages from >> constituents of New Westminster-Burnaby will be given the highest >> priority. Please be certain that you have included your first, last >> name and mailing address (including your postal code) as well as the >> particulars of the federal issue (s) you are concerned about. Thank >> you. >> >> As always, we serve the constituents of New Westminster-Burnaby with >> resources, questions and concerns regarding federal departments and >> agencies. Please don’t hesitate to be in touch with our office with >> your concerns. Due to the rising COVID cases, we encourage you to >> reach our Constituency Office team by email >> peter.julian.c1@parl.gc.ca< >> telephone: 604-775-5707. In-person appointments can be arranged when >> necessary, but are subject to change according to the most recent >> health regulations. >> >> For the most up to date information on Canada’s response to COVID-19 >> as well as information on financial assistance and travel restrictions >> please visit: https://www.canada.ca/en.html >> Stay healthy and safe in these challenging times. >> *** >> Nous vous remercions de prendre contact avec le bureau parlementaire >> de Peter Julian, député dans la circonscription de New >> Westminster-Burnaby. Peter est toujours heureux de recevoir vos >> commentaires et vos suggestions qui sont utiles à son travail, tant au >> Comté qu’au Parlement. >> >> Soyez assuré que, malgré le grand nombre de courriels que nous >> recevons chaque jour, nous accordons toujours la plus haute priorité >> aux messages des commettants de New Westminster-Burnaby et que nous >> examinerons votre courriel le plus tôt possible. NB : veuillez-vous >> assurer SVP de bien nous indiquer les questions qui vous préoccupent >> qui relève du domaine fédéral, ainsi que votre nom, votre prénom, et >> adresse postale, y compris le code postal. Merci. >> >> Comme toujours, notre bureau de circonscription est disponible pour >> vous aider concernant toute question ou préoccupation relevant de la >> compétence fédérale. En raison de l'augmentation des cas de COVID, >> nous vous encourageons à contacter notre équipe par téléphone >> 604-775-5707 et par courriel >> peter.julian.c1@parl.gc.ca< >> obtenir de l’aide. Des rendez-vous en personne peuvent être fixés en >> cas de besoin mais sont susceptibles d'être modifiés en fonction des >> règlements sanitaires les plus récents. >> >> Pour des renseignements à jour sur la réponse du Canada à la COVID-19, >> l’aide financière et les restrictions de voyage, veuillez SVP >> consultez ce lien : https://www.canada.ca/fr.html. >> Restez en santé et en sécurité en cette période difficile. >> Office of Peter Julian, MP (New Westminster-Burnaby) | Bureau du >> député Peter Julian (New Westminster-Burnaby) >> New Democratic Party | Nouveau Parti démocratique >> >> We acknowledge that we work on the unceded traditional territory of >> the Algonquin, Haudenosaunee and Anishinabek peoples. >> Nous reconnaissons que nous travaillons sur le territoire non-cédé des >> nations Algonquine, Haudenosaunee et Anishinabek. >> >> New Westminster is located on the unceded and traditional territory of >> the Halq'eméylem speaking Coast Salish peoples. This includes the >> nations of the Qayqayt, qʼʷa:n̓ƛʼən̓ (Kwantlen), Katzie, kʷikʷəƛw̓əm >> (Kwikwetlem), xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam), Stó:lō, sc̓əwaθn məsteyəxʷ >> (Tsawwassen), and Tsleil-Waututh. >> >> Burnaby is located on the ancestral and unceded >> homelands<https://www. >> of the >> hən̓q̓əmin̓əm̓<http://www. >> and >> Sḵwx̱wú7mesh<https://www. >> speaking peoples as well as all Coast Salish peoples. >> ______________________________ >> >> (TEL) 613.992.4214 | (CELL) 613.222.4074 | FAX) 613.947.9500 >> >> UFCW | TUAC >> >> P Help save paper - do you need to print this email? >> >> P Économisons le papier – est-il vraiment nécessaire d’imprimer ce >> courriel? >> >> "My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. >> Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and >> optimistic. And we’ll change the world." >> -Jack Layton, 1950-2011 >> >> « Mes amis, l’amour est cent fois meilleur que la haine. L’espoir est >> meilleur que la peur. L’optimisme est meilleur que le désespoir. Alors >> aimons, gardons espoir et restons optimistes. Et nous changerons le >> monde. » >> -Jack Layton, 1950-2011 >> >> This email message and any attachment may contain privileged or >> confidential information and is intended only for the named >> recipient(s) or group indicated. If you have received this message in >> error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender and >> delete this email message. Thank you for your cooperation. >> >> Ce courriel, ainsi que tout fichier annexé peut contenir des >> renseignements protégés ou confidentiels et concerne uniquement les >> destinataires indiqués. Si vous avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, ou >> si vous n'êtes pas les destinataires, veuillez en aviser l'expéditeur >> et l'effacer. Merci de votre coopération. >> >> >> >> ---------- Original message ---------- >> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail. >> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 22:29:09 -0400 >> Subject: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending >> her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> To: "andrew.scheer"<andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, info@eurasiagroup.net, >> james@eastpointswest.co.uk, onair@moats.tv, >> dnaylor@westernstandardonline. >> <Lindsay.Mathyssen@parl.gc.ca> >> "Jenny.Kwan"<Jenny.Kwan@parl.gc.ca>, "Alistair.MacGregor" >> <Alistair.MacGregor@parl.gc.ca >> <Matthew.Green@parl.gc.ca>, "Gord.Johns"<Gord.Johns@parl.gc.ca>, >> "peter.julian"<peter.julian@parl.gc.ca>, "brian.masse" >> <brian.masse@parl.gc.ca>, "don.davies"<don.davies@parl.gc.ca>, >> "Alexandre.Boulerice"<Alexandre.Boulerice@parl.gc. >> lisamarie.barron@parl.gc.ca, "Richard.Cannings" >> <Richard.Cannings@parl.gc.ca>, "Taylor.Bachrach" >> <Taylor.Bachrach@parl.gc.ca>, "Laurel.Collins" >> <Laurel.Collins@parl.gc.ca>, "Rachel.Blaney" >> <Rachel.Blaney@parl.gc.ca>, "randall.garrison" >> <randall.garrison@parl.gc.ca>, cathay.wagantall@parl.gc.ca, >> Corey.Tochor@parl.gc.ca, kevin.waugh@parl.gc.ca, >> Brad.Redekopp@parl.gc.ca, fraser.tolmie@parl.gc.ca, "Gary.Vidal" >> <Gary.Vidal@parl.gc.ca>, Warren.Steinley@parl.gc.ca, "Michael.Kram" >> <Michael.Kram@parl.gc.ca>, kelly.block@parl.gc.ca, >> robert.kitchen@parl.gc.ca, Rosemarie.Falk@parl.gc.ca, >> randy.hoback@parl.gc.ca, Jeremy.Patzer@parl.gc.ca >> Cc: motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Caryma.Sad@gmail.com, >> erinbcomber1@icloud.com, beth.macdonell@bellmedia.ca, >> stoosnews@nexicom.net, media@eurasiagroup.net, "Chris.Hall" >> <Chris.Hall@cbc.ca>, "Wesley.Wark@uottawa.ca \"president\"" >> <president@uottawa.ca>, "presidents.office" >> <presidents.office@carleton.ca >> >> https://davidraymondamos3. >> >> Saturday, 19 February 2022 >> >> Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland defending her liberal >> democracy byway of her bankster buddies >> >> Deja Vu Anyone??? >> > | |
Sadly this “christian” thinks otherwise