mailto:Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca>.

Kindly be advised that should your correspondence be directed towards
the Speaker of the House of Commons, it is recommended to address it
to the Speaker's Office using the following electronic address:
Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca<mailto:Speaker.President@parl.gc.ca>.


[English follows]

Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d'avoir communiqué avec le bureau de l'honorable
Greg Fergus, Député de Hull-Aylmer.

Nous apprécions que vous ayez pris le temps de nous écrire. Ce message
confirme que notre bureau a reçu votre courriel et qu'il sera examiné
sous peu.

Toute la correspondance est lue, mais en raison du volume élevé de
courriels reçus, il se peut que les campagnes de lettres types et la
correspondance provenant de l'extérieur de Hull-Aylmer ne reçoivent
pas de réponse directe.

La priorité est accordée aux commettants de Hull-Aylmer. Veillez donc
à indiquer votre nom complet et votre adresse personnelle, y compris
votre code postal et votre numéro de téléphone, dans tous vos
courriels.

Même si nos bureaux de circonscription ne reçoivent habituellement pas
de visiteurs sans rendez-vous, sachez que notre équipe est toujours là
pour vous! Vous pouvez nous joindre pour toute demande d'information
fédérale au 819-994-8844 (Hull) ou au 819-682-1125 (Aylmer).

Cordialement,

Bureau de l’honorable Greg Fergus, Député de Hull-Aylmer


Good day,

Thank you for contacting the office of the Honourable Greg Fergus,
Member of Parliament for Hull-Aylmer.

We appreciate you taking the time to write to us. This message is to
acknowledge that our office has received your email and it will be
reviewed shortly.

All correspondence is read, however, due to the high volume of emails
received, form letter campaigns and correspondence from outside
Hull-Aylmer may not receive a direct response.

Priority is given to constituents of Hull-Aylmer. Please be sure to
include your full name, and home address, including postal code and
phone number, on all emails.

Although our constituency offices do not usually receive walk-in
visitors, our team is always there for you! You can reach us for
federal information at 819-994-8844 (Hull) or 819-682-1125 (Aylmer).

Kind Regards,

Office of the Honourable Greg Fergus, M.P. for Hull-Aylmer
https://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.com/2023/10/mps-voting-on-new-speaker-of-house-of.html

Tuesday, 3 October 2023

Liberal MP Greg Fergus elected Speaker of the House of Commons

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/mps-vote-new-speaker-1.6984673


Liberal MP Greg Fergus elected Speaker of the House of Commons
New Speaker's first task will be to help Parliament turn the page on
Yaroslav Hunka affair

John Paul Tasker · CBC News · Posted: Oct 03, 2023 5:00 AM ADT


Three men walk arm-in-arm in a government building Newly elected
Speaker of the House of Commons Greg Fergus is escorted into the House
of Commons by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Conservative Leader
Pierre Poilievre on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Oct. 3,
2023. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Liberal MP Greg Fergus has been elected the new Speaker of the House
of Commons — and his first challenge will be to help Parliament turn
the page on the embarrassing Yaroslav Hunka incident.

Fergus, who represents the Quebec riding of Hull-Aylmer near Ottawa,
is the first Black Speaker of the Commons. He was picked by his
colleagues through a secret ranked-ballot vote.

In his pitch for the job, Fergus vowed to improve the decorum in the
Commons — something past Speakers have also promised with little
success.

Debates in the chamber routinely include nasty partisan bickering. MPs
also often flout the rules and heckling is a common tactic,
particularly in question period.

"Respect and decorum — I'm going to be working hard on this and I need
all your help to make this happen," Fergus said in his first remarks
from the Speaker's chair after being elected.

"Respect is a fundamental part of what we do here. We need to make
sure that we treat each other with respect and we show Canadians that
example. There can be no dialogue unless there's a mutual
understanding of respect."
WATCH: MP Greg Fergus addresses House after being elected Speaker

MP Greg Fergus addresses House after being elected Speaker
Duration 2:22
Quebec Liberal MP Greg Fergus takes over the role of House Speaker
from Anthony Rota, who resigned after inviting a former Ukrainian
soldier who fought in a Nazi division to Parliament.

Speaking to reporters before the vote earlier Tuesday, Fergus was
asked about the prospect of becoming the first Black person in the
role.

"The historic nature of that is not lost on me," he said, adding
"that's not the reason why I'm asking my colleagues to vote for me.

"I'm asking them to vote for me because I'm the best candidate and
that I'm the person who can apply the rules, fairly, firmly and
consistently."

Candidate for Speaker and member of Parliament Greg Fergus delivers a
speech in the House of Commons prior to voting on Parliament Hill in
Ottawa on Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2023. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
Newly elected Speaker Greg Fergus has vowed to improve the decorum of
debates in the Commons — something past speakers have promised without
success. (Sean Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Fergus is a long-time admirer of Canada's Parliament.

He said Tuesday that, as a young person, he had the Hansard — the
official record of debates — delivered to his home.

In 1988, he came to Ottawa to serve as a parliamentary page — fetching
water for MPs and delivering letters, among other tasks.

One of those MPs Fergus worked with decades ago was Bloc Québécois MP
Louis Plamondon, who presided over the Speaker's election today as
"Dean of the House"— the MP with the longest unbroken sitting record
who isn't a minister or party leader.

Fergus is known as a loyal Liberal. He served as president of the
Young Liberals of Canada in 1990s.

In 2007, former Liberal leader Stéphane Dion named him national
director — the most senior role in the party's organizational
hierarchy. In that position, he helped prepare the party for an
election through fundraising and get-out-the-vote mobilization.

Fergus, first elected in 2015, served as Prime Minister Justin
Trudeau's parliamentary secretary — a testament to the close
relationship he enjoys with the head of government.

Trudeau and his cabinet gave Fergus a standing ovation as he assumed
the chair at the front of the Commons.
WATCH: Trudeau congratulates Fergus for being elected Speaker

Trudeau congratulates Fergus for being elected Speaker
Duration 1:51
Justin Trudeau says MP Greg Fergus's election as the first Black
Speaker of the House 'should be inspiring to all Canadians, especially
younger generations who want to get involved in politics.'

"We elected you to help us be civil in our debates, to remind us we're
all here for the same reason, which is to serve Canadians," Trudeau
said.

"Canadians expect us all to work together to deliver results. They
expect us to behave to the highest standard."

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre said Fergus's election was "an
incredible achievement."

He said Canadians are depending on Fergus to keep the government honest.

    Who's in, who's out and everything else you need to know about the
Speaker election

    Anthony Rota resigns as Speaker after honouring Ukrainian veteran
who fought with Nazi unit

Recounting the origins of parliamentary democracy in the United
Kingdom, Poilievre said: "The first commoners met in fields. They were
the peasants and the farmers who were tired of having their crops
taxed away by an impossibly cruel crown. Today we have a similar
circumstance with a government that is excessively powerful and
costly."

"The role of Parliament in restraining the power of the prime minister
is primordial," Poilievre said.

Fergus has been an advocate for social housing and seniors.

He served as a member of the board of directors of the Aylmer Arms, a
residence for semi-retired and retired seniors, and as a member of a
local parish council.

Previously, he was vice-president of a neighbourhood association and
was also involved with school committees, sports teams and
organizations promoting regional interests.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau votes in the Election for Speaker in the
House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday, Oct. 3,
2023. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau votes in the Election for Speaker
in the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Tuesday. (Sean
Kilpatrick/The Canadian Press)

Like some other Liberal MPs, Fergus has been known to filibuster
Commons committee hearings on various government mishaps — such as the
hearings on the WE Charity scandal.

During one contentious meeting about an ill-fated COVID-era summer
student jobs program partnership with that non-profit, Fergus spoke in
Latin and cited ancient Greece to run out the clock, and called the
opposition-backed inquiry a "fishing expedition."

Earlier this year, the ethics commissioner found Fergus violated the
Conflict of Interest Act by writing a letter of support for a
television channel's application to the CRTC for mandatory carriage.

Under parliamentary rules, MPs can write letters of support to the
CRTC in support of an application, but parliamentary secretaries and
cabinet ministers cannot.

Fergus apologized for what he called his "unintentional error."

The Speaker election was prompted by Anthony Rota's decision to vacate
the chair after taking full responsibility for inviting Hunka — a
98-year-old veteran of a Nazi unit — to participate in the celebration
of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during his recent visit.

Fergus beat out P.E.I. Liberal MP Sean Casey, Nova Scotia Conservative
MP Chris d'Entremont, Ontario NDP MP Carol Hughes, B.C. Green MP
Elizabeth May, Quebec Liberal MP Alexandra Mendès and Quebec Liberal
MP Peter Schiefke for the job.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

John Paul Tasker

Senior reporter

J.P. Tasker is a journalist in CBC's parliamentary bureau who reports
for digital, radio and television. He is also a regular panellist on
CBC News Network's Power & Politics. He covers the Conservative Party,
Canada-U.S. relations, Crown-Indigenous affairs, climate change,
health policy and the Senate. You can send story ideas and tips to
J.P. at john.tasker@cbc.ca.

    Follow J.P. on Twitter

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices


2692 Comments



David Amos
Now boils down to Greg Fergus and I


David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to David Amos
Perhaps Speaker Fergus will study my next email rather closely tonight




David Amos
Perhaps Anthony Rota or his buddy Geoff Regan should explain my email
to all the wannabe speakers ASAP


Mark Sunday
Reply to David Amos
I doubt it.


David Amos
Reply to Mark Sunday
Don't bet the farm on it




Mark Sunday
Polly, trying real hard to LOOK relevant.


David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to Mark Sunday
I thought that was your job


Michael Robert
Reply to Mark Sunday
Or be relevant!




Al Clark
Why didn't PP push a 'volunteer' forward?


David Amos
Reply to Al Clark
Go figure


Derek Andrews
Reply to Al Clark
There was one.


Rosemary Hughes
Reply to Al Clark
There was a CPC contender. d'Entremont.


David Amos
Reply to Rosemary Hughes
He was a deputy too


Joyce Conley
Reply to Al Clark
What do you mean a volunteer came forward.


David Amos
Content Deactivated
Reply to Al Clark
Cat got your tongue?


Felix Culpa
Reply to Al Clark
The Deputy Speaker was the Conservative running. Speaker is a
non-partisan role. The Liberals sued Speaker Rota, a Liberal MP, as a
pressure tactic to avoid fulfilling a demand by the Commons for
documents.


Automatic reply: RE Trudeau Invoking the Emergency Act and Freeland
defending her liberal democracy byway of her bankster buddies


Fergus, Greg - Député/MP
<Greg.Fergus@parl.gc.ca>        Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 10:23 PM
To: David Amos <david.raymond.amos333@gmail.com>



(English follows)



Bonjour,

Nous vous remercions d’avoir communiqué avec le bureau du député Greg
Fergus. Cette réponse automatisée vise à accuser réception de votre
courriel et à vous informer que nous communiquerons avec vous sous
peu. La priorité sera donnée aux demandes des résidents de
Hull-Aylmer.

Pour nous aider à répondre le plus rapidement possible à vos
préoccupations, assurez-vous de nous transmettre dans le corps de
votre message votre nom complet, votre adresse (y compris le code
postal) et votre numéro de téléphone.

Pour obtenir une liste des services du gouvernement fédéral et des
numéros de contact, veuillez consulter le site :
https://gregfergus.libparl.ca/2020/07/13/services-gouvernementaux/

Nous recevons un grand nombre de courriels, merci de votre patience et
compréhension.

Bureau du député Greg Fergus



MISE À JOUR COVID-19 :

REMARQUE : si vous avez des symptômes de COVID-19, isolez-vous
immédiatement et appelez-le 819-644-4545 (Gatineau) ou le
1-877-644-4545 (sans frais) pour vous faire dépister le plus tôt
possible.



Notre gouvernement tient à ce que les Canadiennes et les Canadiens
sachent que nous sommes avec eux. Alors que la COVID-19 continue
d’évoluer rapidement à travers le monde, notre priorité absolue est de
protéger la santé des Canadiens.



Afin d’assurer la sécurité dans notre pays, le gouvernement a mis à la
disposition de tous les Canadiens, qu’ils soient actuellement sur
notre territoire ou à l’étranger des plateformes en ligne pour
informer et renseigner sur les mesures à prendre face au COVID-19 :
canada.ca/le-coronavirus



Alors que nous nous isolons chez nous, il est important de se rappeler
de prendre soin de nous-mêmes et de ceux qui nous entourent. N'hésitez
pas de demander de l'aide, c'est un signe de courage et de sagesse!
(ressources ci-dessous) :

·     Centre de prévention du suicide du Québec : 1-866-APPELLE
(1-866-277-3553)

·     Services de crises du Canada : appelez 1-833-456-4566 ou tapez «
Start » par SMS au 45645 (service offert entre 16h et minuit)
https://www.crisisservicescanada.ca/fr/



-------------------------------------------------------------

Good day,

Thank you for contacting the office of Greg Fergus.  This is an
automated message to acknowledge that we have received your email and
will be in touch shortly. Please note that our first priority is to
respond to inquiries from residents of Hull-Aylmer.

To help us address your concerns more quickly, please include within
the body of your email your full name, your address (including the
postal code) and telephone number.

For a list of federal government services and contact numbers please
visit: https://gregfergus.libparl.ca/2020/07/13/services-gouvernementaux/?lang=en

We are receiving a high volume of inquiries at this time; thank you
for your patience and understanding.

Office of MP Greg Fergus

***********************************

-------------------



COVID-19 UPDATE:

NOTE: if you have COVID-19 symptoms, self-isolate immediately and call
819-644-4545 (Gatineau) or 1-877-644-4545 (toll free) to get tested as
soon as possible.



Our government wants Canadians to know that we have their backs. As
COVID-19 continues to evolve rapidly around the world, our top
priority is to protect the health of Canadians.



To ensure the safety and security of our country, the Government has
made available to all Canadians, both at home and abroad, online
platforms that help inform and educate on measures to take in
preventing the transmission of COVID-19: canada.ca/coronavirus



As we isolate ourselves at home, it is important to remember to
proactively take care of ourselves and those around us. Never hesitate
to reach out for help, it’s a sign of courage and wisdom! (resources
below)

·     Suicide prevention centre of Quebec: 1-866-APPELLE (1-866-277-3553)

·     Crisis Services Canada: call 1-833-456-4566 or text 45645 (4 pm
to midnight) https://www.crisisservicescanada.ca/en/


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ERN3OrEBWU&ab_channel=MaritimeMalaise


Me,Myself and I
MaritimeMalaise
51 subscribers
281 viewsOct 9, 2010
Transcript
0:02
close though as we heard your brother
0:04
for candidates for parties other than
0:05
the so-called big three major parties
0:07
say they have a tough time getting media
0:08
attention during election campaigns
0:10
tonight we take a small step toward
0:12
remedying that joining us tonight are
0:14
three of those candidates who are not
0:16
flying the colors of one of the big
0:17
three parties beginning with Nick right
0:18
candidate who left the Green Party in
0:21
Halifax mr. I could even do you good
0:23
evening also joining us tonight from
0:24
Munson is Ron Palillo who is running for
0:26
the Canadian Action Party India was from
0:29
thank you and in products in tonight
0:31
david amos who is running as an
0:33
independent candidate incredible riding
0:34
federative Mr Amos welcome good even do
0:36
today to my fellow Maritimers and I'll
0:39
begin with mr. dick right at Halifax
0:41
I'll begin with you because the Green
0:42
Party is in fact unique among all of the
0:44
other parties in that you have
0:45
candidates in all 308 ridings and
0:48
significant albeit single-digit support
0:50
in most of the polls and yet it seems
0:52
the Green Party is battling for
0:54
acceptance and attention what exactly is
0:56
the problem there just right so I think
0:58
you find a real distinction between be
0:59
the national perspective in the local
1:02
perspective because uh nationally the
1:05
big three big five private corporations
1:08
of the side who doesn't does not
1:09
participate in debate the Green Party's
1:11
being excluded Steph certain takes on
1:13
who they want to be included however at
1:15
the local level I know I've gone firstly
1:17
and from the other pendants I've spoken
1:19
to overwhelming ways we've been include
1:21
in the debate we've gotten tons of press
1:23
coverage so I think the green party
1:24
really is emerging as a viable
1:26
alternative to the old pre party or the
1:28
old platforms let me ask you you're a
1:30
young man will do subtracted youth the
1:31
green boys wouldn't feel can you go the
1:33
Green Party is that it has new ideas
1:35
looks not just the short term but also
1:37
the long term we're not just both
1:39
environment although as the Sierra Club
1:41
canada reason we said we do have the
1:43
best environmental platform we're also
1:45
forgot the social policy we believe in
1:47
universal public health care pharmacare
1:49
daycare we healthcare we look not just
1:51
the short term but also look at our
1:54
institutions prevention dealing with
1:57
obesity we're also fiscally responsible
1:59
which means balanced budgets and smart
2:01
taxation and again that environmental
2:03
emphasis because we can't drink the
2:05
water and breathe the air than the other
2:07
platforms other policies don't really
2:08
matter fair enough mr. Pownall ODU your
2:10
party is i repel was founded by Paul
2:12
Hellyer who in his lifetime was a
2:13
liberal and I could
2:15
leadership candidate for both of those
2:16
parties what appeals are you about about
2:19
the caap it's the monetary reform policy
2:23
and to give you a small example Steve
2:25
just does it to help you understand the
2:26
use of the Bank of Canada today as
2:29
opposed to the way we use the previous
2:30
1974 today to Bank of Canada that holds
2:33
about five percent of national debt
2:35
because of that it turns over two
2:37
million dollars that have two billion
2:38
dollars of your excuse me profit back to
2:40
the government or back to all Canadians
2:42
what we say is if we went back to the
2:44
pre-1970 full of course we're at times
2:46
be held for the one percent we would be
2:48
turning over 8 billion dollars in profit
2:50
back to government and as we go higher
2:52
the more for more money we would get and
2:54
if therefore we would define all our
2:57
social programs so for you it's all
2:58
about the monetary policy yes it is mr.
3:00
Anderson fredericton even with 15
3:02
registered parties in the country
3:03
representing many and varied
3:05
philosophies you are running free of
3:06
party affiliation as an independent why
3:08
are you independent and what are you
3:10
independent prompt I'm a very
3:13
independent character in I last time
3:16
when i ran for prom in 2004 I proved my
3:20
integrity to all parliamentarians and
3:22
legions of lawyers in public service now
3:25
I demand they prove their integrity me
3:28
before I sue the crown in federal court
3:31
here in private what are you gonna shoot
3:33
for no false imprisonment while I was
3:37
running for Parliament last time I was
3:39
summoned in the United States of America
3:41
false in prison without being read my
3:43
rights and held into the charges of
3:45
bother now as you know mr. Ramos
3:47
independent candidates in our country
3:48
usually don't get elected what message
3:51
are you sending to to the voters of
3:52
Frederick didn't just buy one not just
3:56
fredericton but I first must apologize
3:58
the folks in ormoc today expecting to
4:00
see me right now but the country in
4:02
general in Maritimes in particular
4:05
please stress test the integrity of the
4:08
Parliamentarians before you elect them
4:11
because after Lou there they are not
4:13
accountable how do you stress test the
4:15
integrity of a politician ask them what
4:17
I'm talking about mr. Pablo even with a
4:21
party label you're facing a pretty steep
4:24
battle as well how much of what you do
4:26
you know running putting yourself out to
4:28
the people of Boston is really there's
4:30
really a protest of some sort no it's
4:33
not a protest at all i think i think i
4:35
have a fair chance at winning there's a
4:37
four to six percent undecided voters
4:39
right now and I'd like to say that if I
4:41
wasn't like definitely the pearl would
4:42
that be the only one among the
4:43
candidates you never feel any better you
4:46
know what's going to be minority
4:47
government you know the leaders of the
4:49
whatever it might earn together what's
4:50
gonna have to negotiate for votes I've
4:52
quit something for smaller parties just
4:54
in I believe I can do that thanks on the
4:56
job both well let's talk about power
4:57
with Nick right in real terms what would
5:00
even a small rump of green MPs be able
5:03
to accomplish in a parliament that would
5:05
still be dominated by you know the
5:07
massive caucuses perhaps even a majority
5:09
talk so one of the other parts just
5:12
getting the the green voice in
5:14
Parliament is an important opponent
5:16
right now as I was saying we're not
5:17
looking at the long term we're just
5:18
looking at the short term so we need to
5:20
get that social aggressive policy that
5:22
this responsibility what you don't see
5:24
in that combination with the other
5:25
parties we have to have a strong
5:26
environmental message we have to ship
5:28
ship their subsidies away from the
5:30
Golden gas industries towards renewable
5:32
resources we have to focus on health not
5:35
just health care and generally we have
5:37
to start thinking the long term and
5:39
serve looking towards sustainability and
5:41
I should add that in this election and
5:44
then last which is a first each vote
5:46
gets a dollar 75 per year you know so it
5:49
is important to pick you both the Green
5:50
Party you're not just supporting our
5:52
progressive platform but you're also
5:53
builds a better Monica structure
5:55
absolutely I want to ask you to view
5:56
before I let you go when you consider
5:57
how many voters say they're disenchanted
5:59
with established parties why do you
6:00
think more people don't vote for
6:02
alternative parties and independents
6:04
like yourselves and I'll begin with you
6:06
Nick right why do you think more people
6:07
don't vote for parties like the green
6:10
party well for wine we're not including
6:11
the national debate and people are aware
6:14
of the platform then clearly they can't
6:15
come educated about it and both the
6:17
parties so I think awareness is the
6:19
fundamental issue mr. problem why do you
6:21
think historically Canadians have enough
6:23
to devote for your party and other
6:24
parties in the alternative category well
6:27
I think they just don't think there's a
6:28
chance that we work for our government
6:30
but you gotta start somewhere so I would
6:32
ask people great a monkey to have the
6:34
courage
6:35
this time around david amos why don't
6:37
people vote for independence i think you
6:38
make a strong case you know you're
6:40
independent you're free of all of the
6:41
external influences y know people choose
6:42
to vote for an independent voice like
6:44
yours more often most folks vote for the
6:47
color of the coat I'm begging the people
6:50
that have never voted in your life like
6:52
me to please vote and consider me a one
6:57
independent can keep all
6:59
parliamentarians accountable did you say
7:02
you've never voted never in my life sir
7:04
you don't even vote for yourself I this
7:08
time I would like to vote for myself but
7:10
I'm a permanent American resident and I
7:12
can't afford to give up my status as an
7:14
American because there must protect
7:16
family searched interest there you're
7:18
allowed to run but you're not allowed to
7:19
vote I'm 18 a proud Canadian and not
7:22
Jail it's all required that a thousand
7:24
dollars very interesting talking to the
7:26
three of you tonight I appreciate your
7:28
coming in thanks very much to you mr.
7:29
david amos lee dependent in fredericton
7:30
ron for below the canadian action
7:32
particular my candidate in the mountain
7:34
and nick broke three party candidate to
7:36



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ca6Egqghmw&t=320s&ab_channel=DavidAmos


Tom Young
David Amos
46 subscribers
96 views Dec 12, 2012
https://archive.org/details/ITriedToExplainItToAllMaritimersInEarly2006

Transcript
0:00
now our number is 1-866-4110889
0:07
that toll-free number applies wherever
0:11
you can hear this program
0:14
we had a gentleman who called
0:16
identifying himself as david from sussex
0:19
david go right ahead please hey tom
0:21
thanks put me on the air i was trying
0:24
hard to talk to you and duff at the same
0:26
time
0:27
as
0:28
i was calling i heard him say about
0:31
when the prime minister designate gets
0:33
sworn in
0:35
and when everybody starts their job in
0:37
the gray area and stuff like that
0:40
well
0:41
i was somewhat murky of the rules myself
0:44
so i called the speaker of the office uh
0:47
speaker of the house rather peter
0:48
milliken yes yesterday
0:51
to get the load down of it because if
0:53
you pick up the phone right now and call
0:55
a
0:56
uh
0:57
here
0:58
uh pettigrew or ann mcclellan even
1:01
though they weren't reelected
1:02
they're still
1:04
minister of public safety and minister
1:06
of foreign affairs today right until
1:09
they're replaced
1:10
until they replaced right and the
1:12
cabinet gets sworn in
1:14
on the six
1:15
and it's all the big mystery who
1:17
who's the deputy prime minister of the
1:19
minister of justice etc etc yeah we
1:22
won't know until uh
1:23
until they walk in yeah but the problem
1:26
is i don't i don't think it's any secret
1:28
who the deputy prime minister is i think
1:30
everybody knows who that is uh it's kind
1:32
of up in the air that there was that
1:34
lawrence guy on tv last night yeah
1:36
cannon yeah
1:38
but peter mccabe by all reports may be
1:42
minister of justice and then there's
1:43
toads out in the
1:45
west
1:46
yeah
1:48
yeah yeah
1:49
but that said um
1:51
who ruled the ruth and wynn
1:54
was a question i needed to answer
1:57
from the queen because even though the
1:59
queen is the figurative head of the
2:00
state
2:02
the speaker of the house speaks for her
2:04
yes
2:04
and everyone in parliament addresses her
2:07
through him
2:09
yeah her through him yes
2:12
now peter milliken is a liberal yes
2:15
he remains speaker of the house
2:18
until
2:20
the governor general gives her speech
2:22
from the throne
2:23
and the 39th parliament begins okay
2:27
it's kind of real weird
2:30
you know what i mean yeah so
2:33
in a sense yes there's a new cabinet
2:35
coming in but everybody has to deal with
2:37
the liberal
2:39
peter milliken
2:40
until
2:42
michelle jean gives her speech from the
2:44
throne whenever that is and and even the
2:47
speaker of the house was not sure when
2:49
that was going to happen yesterday right
2:52
so this is a very there's probably only
2:55
one person who knows exactly
2:58
and i'm quite sure that she doesn't even
3:00
know yet when exactly the speech on the
3:02
phone will occur and that would be the
3:04
prime minister
3:06
the governor general is the one that
3:07
said so well nobody actually picks the
3:10
day
3:10
well oh okay
3:12
she picks the day after he says to her i
3:16
think this is the day we ought to do it
3:17
and she will agree i think that's well
3:19
he goes he goes to her yes with his new
3:22
cabinet yes and he says ma'am
3:25
i think i can run a government yes
3:28
and she says yeah i think so too i'll
3:32
give a speech and we'll let the 39th
3:34
parliament begin and then the 38th
3:37
parliament
3:38
selects a speaker of the house and that
3:40
could be a liberal
3:42
uh yeah it well it could be it could be
3:45
but it's not likely to be yeah because
3:47
usually the the ruling party has the
3:50
speaker the house control the show yeah
3:52
and everybody addresses him and like
3:54
peter milliken he saved paul martin on
3:56
the 19th yes because he was the one that
3:59
cast the deciding vote yeah yeah yeah
4:01
but normally what happens is despite the
4:04
fact that the speaker of the house is
4:06
chosen uh from the by the members of the
4:09
uh of the house but of the whole house
4:12
of the whole house to hold out that
4:14
degree yeah absolutely not at the
4:16
majority i should say no no
4:17
they'll vote yeah i mean there could be
4:19
three or four or five different people
4:21
who will let their names stand for the
4:23
speaker and and then they do all kinds
4:25
of political maneuvers exactly exactly
4:29
so the thing is but just a minute let me
4:31
just say this before you go ahead but
4:32
despite the fact that mr milligan is is
4:35
a liberal because he was elected as a
4:37
liberal he's generally recognized as
4:40
being independent whoever the speaker is
4:44
supposedly supposedly
4:46
oh absolutely yeah i'm not now i would
4:48
think the fine man
4:50
to make the speaker of the house
4:53
if both all parties
4:56
were clever
4:58
would be none other than the only
5:00
independent
5:02
and that way they could set them up now
5:03
that would be the clear the clever thing
5:05
to do well
5:06
andre arthur speaker the house yeah uh
5:10
and that was the wicked yeah but i don't
5:12
think uh i don't happen on pipe dreaming
5:15
yeah but if they were clever that's what
5:17
they would do
5:18
because he is the loose cannon on deck
5:22
but you see
5:23
the speaker of the house
5:25
is generally uh not supposed to express
5:29
exactly an opinion exactly that's how
5:31
they could keep them quiet well you're a
5:33
talk show
5:35
and you know how spoken here oh
5:37
absolutely
5:38
and like he is one of my minor heroes
5:41
yeah but he might he might be the first
5:44
guy ever in the history of that job to
5:47
politicize the job of being the speaker
5:49
of the house exactly you know
5:52
i was talking to his assistant yesterday
5:57
andrea arthur's yes
5:59
because he's the guy
6:01
i think
6:03
might protect democracy for you and i
6:06
and as a radio talk show host you just
6:09
got to agree
6:11
but now
6:12
now now the thing about it is is
6:15
uh
6:16
there's this magic time between
6:20
one prime minister and another
6:23
and
6:25
i think once i say a little more you'll
6:27
understand who i am
6:29
but my beef is with mr duff connector
6:32
because he's a lawyer you're not
6:35
he's an officer of the court
6:37
you're not
6:39
now on
6:40
august 25th
6:42
of 2004
6:44
i sent duff connector who is the lawyer
6:47
associated with ralph nader yep that's
6:50
correct
6:52
ralph nader knows exactly who i am
6:56
jeff connector received confirmed canada
6:59
post he got it i mailed it august 24th
7:03
he got it received it
7:05
now
7:06
he is very outspoken four years he's the
7:08
guy that
7:10
took on howard wilson when howard wilson
7:13
said that paul martin must be okay over
7:15
tainted blood years ago because we
7:17
couldn't find the records of the meeting
7:20
and then when howard wilson quit bernard
7:23
shapiro was a big secret for a long time
7:27
but duff connector i've read most of his
7:30
words that i consider important and his
7:33
complaints in various courts
7:36
he's a very interesting lawyer to me
7:39
now i sent him the same stuff that i
7:42
delivered in hand to something
7:45
all the brunswickers should have been
7:47
interested in and that was the
7:48
commission on legislative democracy
7:51
and the lawyer there
7:53
who i addressed was lynn caston gay now
7:57
she teaches law in moncton
7:59
and bernard lord had appointed that
8:02
commission
8:03
to see if democracy was being served in
8:05
new brunswick
8:07
right
8:08
so i went to fredericton
8:10
on the 25th speak with my wife a yankee
8:15
and a lawyer
8:17
who wanted to be the conservative in
8:19
fundy
8:21
instead of rob moore
8:23
right
8:24
and
8:25
we went around and i served lynn
8:27
castengae the lieutenant governor chasan
8:30
who answered me
8:32
the law of society who answered me
8:36
and then we went to visit the police
8:37
commission in fredericton on king street
8:41
i've received many answers but not from
8:44
jeff conaker
8:46
and lynn castonguay
8:48
now duff
8:50
knows
8:52
the sincerity of my efforts
8:54
and the magnitude of the crime
8:58
and did nothing because he is quite
9:02
simply
9:03
just another
9:05
lawyer
9:06
he is part of the corruption
9:09
that he claims to lament greatly about
9:14
now
9:15
amongst many things that i served
9:19
deaf
9:20
conor was a copy




http://thedavidamosrant.blogspot.ca/2013/10/fwd-mikey-duffy-and-lawyers-petey.html

From: "Bastarache, Michel (Heenan Blaikie)"<MBastarache@heenan.ca>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 23:21:32 +0000
Subject: Réponse automatique : Mikey Duffy and the lawyers Petey
MacKay and Arty Hamilton should remember the file called "Upper
Canadians" quite well EH Mr Harper
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>

Je serai absent jusqu`au 1er novembre 2013. Vous  pouvez communiquez
avec mon adjointe Louise Belleau au 613-236-1668.

I will be away from the office until November 1st,  2013. If you
require assistance, please contact my assistant Louise Belleau at
613-236-1668

Merci / Thank you
M Bastarache


[cid:image2e6d67.JPG@bdab12e8.
419ff6b5]


Michel Bastarache
Avocat-Conseil / Counsel
Litige
HEENAN BLAIKIE  SRL / LLP
T 613 236.3488
F 866 441.2699    mbastarache@heenan.ca
55, rue Metcalfe, bureau 300, Ottawa (Ontario) Canada   K1P 6L5
55 Metcalfe Street, Suite 300, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1P 6L5

Ce courriel pourrait contenir des renseignements confidentiels ou
privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le véritable destinataire, veuillez
nous en aviser immédiatement. Merci.

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you
are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately. Thank
you.


Wright's $90K offer to Mike Duffy had conditions, RCMP say
Duffy told not to talk to media in exchange for money
By Meagan Fitzpatrick, CBC News
Posted: Jul 5, 2013 12:21 PM ET
Related Stories
  Who's who in the Senate expense controversy
  Duffy expense saga still riles CBCNews.ca readers
  Senator Mac Harb repays $51K in expenses
  Brazeau's Senate salary to be docked 20% to repay expenses
  Senator Brazeau unlikely to repay expenses by deadline
Nigel Wright's $90,000 payment to cover Senator Mike Duffy's expenses was
offered only with certain conditions, according to court documents that also
show several people in the Prime Minister's Office knew about the offer.

New details about the payment and the circumstances around it are contained
in an application to the court by the RCMP seeking documents from the Senate
and other material for its investigation of Duffy's expense claims.

RCMP investigator Cpl. Greg Horton wrote he has reasonable grounds to
believe Duffy committed breach of trust and fraud on the government because
of inappropriate expense claims and because he accepted the money from
Wright.

  a.. Who's who in the Senate expense controversy
Wright was Prime Minister Stephen Harper's chief of staff who resigned over
the matter once it was reported in the media in May.

The RCMP met with Wright's two lawyers on June 19, and they revealed that
while there was no written contract between Wright and Duffy, Wright asked
for two conditions to be met in return for the $90,000: that Duffy stop
talking to the media and that he reimburse the government immediately with
the money.

The lawyers, Patrick McCann and Peter Mantas, said Wright was not directed
by anyone to make the offer, that he believed it was the ethical thing to do
so that taxpayers weren't on the hook, and that he and Duffy were not
friends.

But the decision came only after the Conservative Party of Canada considered
paying the bill for Duffy's inappropriately claimed expenses when it was
thought he owed $32,000. The party has a fund controlled by Duffy's
colleague in the upper chamber, Senator Irving Gerstein.

When the amount owed jumped to $90,000, the party decided it was too much to
cover. Duffy was concerned he didn't have the money to cover the
reimbursement, the lawyers told the RCMP, and he was also worried that if he
didn't claim a primary residence in Prince Edward Island, his eligibility
for a Senate seat would be at risk.

Some PMO staff knew
Senators Patrick Brazeau and Mac Harb have been asked to pay taxpayers back
for housing and travel allowance claims. Harb paid $51,000 back on Friday.

  a.. Read about Harb's repayment
Wright didn't offer to cover their expenses, the lawyers said. He got a bank
draft from CIBC on March 25 that went to Duffy's lawyer, then Duffy wrote a
personal cheque to pay the government.

Harper says he didn't know about Wright giving the money to Duffy until it
was revealed in the media and in question period on May 28. The prime
minister said Wright made the decision on his own and kept the matter to
himself until May 15.

But the court documents say Wright let the RCMP know on June 21 that he told
Gerstein and three people in Harper's office that he was going to write
Duffy a cheque: David van Hemmen, Chris Woodcock, and Benjamin Perrin.

Perrin worked in the Prime Minister's Office as Harper's legal adviser and
some media reports have said he was involved in arranging the Duffy deal, a
claim he denies. Perrin issued a statement on May 21 saying he "was not
consulted on, and did not participate in" Wright's decision and that he
never talked to Harper about the matter. He recently left his job in the PMO
and is employed by the University of British Columbia.

Conditions attached
Van Hemmen worked as Wright's assistant and Woodcock is director of issues
management in the PMO.

The RCMP investigator says in the court document that he believes the
conditions attached to the payment offer back up the idea that there was an
agreement between Wright and Duffy involving the $90,000 and the Senate
report that ended up not being critical of the Prince Edward Island senator.

It has been reported in the media that Duffy agreed to say publicly he made
a mistake and was paying the money back in exchange for Wright actually
paying the money and a Senate report that would go easy on him.

This would amount to fraud on Duffy's part, according to the RCMP, and his
per diems and his housing allowance that he should not have claimed would be
breach of trust.

The documents lay out details of how the Senate report on Duffy's expenses
was amended by Conservative senators David Tkachuk and Carolyn
Stewart-Olsen. Stewart-Olsen was interviewed by the RCMP and said the report
removed the critical portions about Duffy because he had paid the money
back, she didn't know Wright actually paid the money, and that no one told
her and Tkachuk to change the report from its draft versions.

Duffy was reached by CBC News on Friday and said he had no comment. Wright's
lawyer said he is co-operating with the RCMP and has no further comment.

Harper's spokesman, Andrew MacDougall, was asked by CBC News to respond to a
long list of questions Friday including what role, if any, van Hemmen,
Woodcock, Perrin played and whether Harper knew his party was willing to pay
for Duffy.

"This file was handled by Nigel Wright and he has taken sole responsibility
for his decision to provide his personal funds to Duffy," MacDougall
responded, adding that the court document states Harper was not aware of the
offer and found out about it on May 15.

CBC News also asked Conservative party president John Walsh a series of
questions. Party spokesman Fred DeLorey responded instead by saying only
that the Conservative Fund did not pay for Duffy's expenses.

NDP MP Alexandre Boulerice said the details revealed by the court document
are "troubling." He said in an interview that Harper's version of events "is
just not true."

"It's not a personal issue between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy because there
was a first attempt to cover up this scandal by the Conservative Party," he
said.

Boulerice said he wants to know if Harper knew the party was going to pay
for Duffy and whether he asked his staff who was involved once the news
about Wright's payment broke.

"There's a lot of questions to answer now and Mr. Harper should do the right
thing and tell the truth," he said.

Heritage Minister James Moore said Friday that anyone who abuses the system
should be held accountable and should "leave public office with their head
hung in shame."

"I think when you see people like Senator Duffy or others taking taxpayers'
money, using it in an arrogant, irresponsible and perhaps illegal way, I
think taxpayers are rightfully upset, rightfully mad and they should be," he
told reporters at an event.

Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau said it's curious that the Conservative party
would be willing to pay for Duffy to "make his problems go away" and that
Harper has not been transparent with Canadians.

"It's been a real disappointment and it's frustrating, quite frankly, to
have to be learning about what happened in the Prime Minister's Office
through a very serious police investigation, and this Prime Minister has
completely lost any credibility with the Canadian people because of his
mishandling of this scandal," Trudeau told reporters.

----- Original Message -----
From: David Amos
To: ethics@ic.gc.ca ; gisele.osborne@gnb.ca ; dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
Pelletier, Raymond F. ; zedp@parl.gc.ca ; rmooremp@nb.sympatico.ca ;
savoya2@parl.gc.ca ; thompg@nb.sympatico.ca ;
john_kerry@kerry.senate.gov ; martib@sen.parl.gc.ca ;
dougchristielaw@shaw.ca ; Mayor@ci.boston.ma.us ;
Stephen.Murphy@ci.boston.ma.us ; geline.williams@state.ma.us ; Brian
Mulcahy ; madanr@ojp.usdoj.gov ; strategis@ic.gc.ca ;
wilson.howie@ic.gc.ca ; cbisson@mccarthy.ca ; lynn.morrison@oico.on.ca
Cc: Governor Office ; Governor.Rell@po.state.ct.us ;
smay@pattersonpalmer.ca ; johnduggan@legalaid.nf.ca ;
brenda.boyd@RCMP-GRC.gc.ca ; McLellan.A@parl.gc.ca ; david@lutz.nb.ca
; cynthia.merlini@dfait-maeci.gc.ca ; ethics@harvard.edu ;
INFO7@elections.ca ; inquiry.admin@bellnet.ca ; cotlei@parl.gc.ca ;
Robert.Creedon@state.ma.us ; Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us ;
Jack.Hart@state.ma.us ; Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us ;
Rep.AStephenTobin@hou.state.ma.us ; Dianne.Wilkerson@state.ma.us ;
Daphne.Thompson@gems2.gov.bc.ca ; coulter.osborne@oico.on.ca ;
WayneGreen@mail.gov.nl.ca ; gallanpm@gov.ns.ca ;
anrobins@vac-acc.gc.ca ; cei@nbnet.nb.ca ; kbar@nbnet.nb.ca ; Byron
Prior
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 12:52 PM
Subject: Small wonder the lady speaking for Bernard Shapiro believed me

. Senator Joe Day should have given him my material a long long time
ago. I thought Howie Wilson still had the job because everything was
kinda murky within Strategis at the time and nobody would respond to
me. Since my affairs in the USA are beginning to develop in a positive
direction, now Joe Day and the others are just starting to pretend
that they are ethical? Not on my watch. I have yet to find out who the
hell the Ethics Counselor is for the Senate but rest assured I will
find out and forward him all that I will send to you. Good luck with
your conscience folks. Perhaps someone should call me soon. 506
434-1379

Friday the 13th of August, 2004

Senator Joseph A. Day
14 Everett St.
Hampton, NB

Prime Minister, Paul Martin
80 Wellington Street
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A2

Eva Plunkett Inspector General (CSIS)
340 Laurier Avenue West
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0P8

Ethics Counselor, Howard Wilson
66 Slater St., 22nd Floor
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0C9

Geoff Reagan c/o Irwin Cotler,
900 Justice Building
Ottawa, ON. K1A 0A6

Philippe Rabot
RCMP External Review Committee
P.O. Box 1159, Station B
Ottawa, ON. K1P 5R2

RE: Corruption

Hey Joe,

The fact that you said I was not worth voting for is no matter to me.
I just wish my fellow Canadians had the right to vote you out of your
job. That is one thing I agree with Mr. Lord about. To me you are just
another lawyer who couldn’t get elected so you were politically
appointed to a high government position for the benefit of Irving
interests. Now that you are in public service not only must you obey
the Code of Conduct of your chosen profession, you must act ethically
as a well paid federal employee and speak for the public good. Forget
your former employer’s interests and do your job.

It is time to check the work of many high officials and mine as well.
I demand that you study of the enclosed material then forward it all
to the Prime Minister Paul Martin. Ask him to forward copies of it all
to the other above named government employees and to the Arar
Commission in particular. I can easily prove prior contact to all the
above named persons or their offices and I believe they should be
expecting to see this stuff. The CD of the copy of wiretap tape
numbered 139 is served upon you as an officer of the court in
confidence in order that it may be properly investigated. I have given
you many more documents than the ones I will mention in the following
paragraphs. I will send a copy of this letter to many people as a
double check on your ethics.

One of the documents of foremost importance to me is a recent letter
Attorney General Brad Green sent to me dated August 3rd. It is
attached to the letter and all the other material I had delivered to
Bernard Lord and Frank McKenna just after Canada Day. I deem the
aforesaid letter to be so important because he is the first Canadian
public servant in any office to even admit knowledge my concerns and
allegations in two months of waiting for a proper response. His
position in public service and his answer forever prove just how bad
things really are in Canada and the USA. I am not sorry for the delay
in providing you with this material as I planned and stated within the
enclosed email. If you had wanted it, you would have returned my calls
or answered my email.

I had spoken to many people about my concerns as I ran for Parliament.
I made certain that the proper authorities knew of my allegations the
instant I was on Canadian soil. If our government was on the up and
up, someone should have sent the cops around to pick this stuff up or
at least ask me a few questions a long time ago. I cannot wait any
longer for my country to act properly in my defense. The Yankees now
want me in court.

The recent letter from Brad Green and the actions of some other bad
actors in Fredericton and the USA gave me cause to pause, rethink and
rewrite a bunch of stuff. One would think that Henrick Tonning, the
first judge that Green had ever appointed or the unnamed duty counsel
in court on the first day of Brad’s new plan to defend the rights of
the people would have informed him that I was very pissed off and
still in New Brunswick. The Sheriff who refused to identify himself in
Henrik’s court that day was more than willing to take me away and
under his jurisdiction. What province writes the Sheriff’s paycheck?
Even the local rumormill had enough time to generate enough gossip
from July 29th to August 3rd for Brad Green to be adequately informed
before he wrote such a ridiculous letter to me. Clearly Brad paid no
heed my fair warning to lawyers about making one false move. Maybe he
should call the former Attorney General in New Hampshire and ask Peter
Heed why he paid no heed to me. Now I will prove to both Mr Heed and
Brad Green that I wasn’t joking and that I am well within the
jurisdiction of law enforcement in both New Brunswick and New
Hampshire.

If the Fredericton City Police arrest me as I approach the legislature
one day very soon, Brad Green, Bruce Noble and I will have lots to
argue about in years to come in many courts. I will be filing a
complaint against them and several others with the Law Society anyway.
I am looking to hire an ethical lawyer to sue the bastards long before
the Law Society gets around to figuring out how to ignore my
allegations. What would you do if you were I? Do you know an ethical
lawyer that I can discuss this with? Or would I fare better if I acted
ethically in a Pro Se fashion?

My encounter with the Ombudsman, Bernard Richard proved much to me
about NB politicians. I didn’t believe what he said about Wayne
Steeves the second he mentioned Connie Fogal. He tried so hard to
argue about jurisdiction that he maintained Rule One of the Code of
Professional Conduct of the New Brunswick Law Society is not about
integrity but jurisdiction. No lawyer is that dumb and the last thing
I would want is such a man to speak for me. So I promptly told him I
would see him in court and ended our conversation. He was obviously
arguing against me for the benefit of Brad Green rather than making a
sincere and ethical effort to listen to me and address my concerns to
the powers that be on my behalf. Richard likely has few Liberal
friends to chum with. For all I know he may have just got back from
Larry’s Gulch so I allowed him to continue on the fishing expedition
byway of email. For his information just in case he is that dumb, I
brought up the subject of integrity so he would stop arguing
jurisdiction and act more ethically and diligently as a lawyer. When
he continued, I quit talking and sought proof of contact. Lawyers must
maintain their integrity no matter the jurisdiction or issue.

I can easily refute the jurisdictional argument of both Mr. Richard
and Brad Green. I am used to that legal dodge. Thirty-three years ago
a RCMP officer charged me with speeding by within the city limits of
Fredericton. When I questioned his jurisdiction the Crown was quick to
inform me that the RCMP have jurisdiction over everyone everywhere in
Canada. If I were to unbuckle my seat belt in defiance of a NB law as
I drove to Hampton to serve this material upon a lawyer employed as a
Senator in the federal government, in what court would I appear? What
if I served this material upon the cop that had the authority stop me?
If the matter was heard in Hampton or Sussex Provincial Court
shouldn’t Judge Henrik Tonning immediately recuse himself because of
his words to me in court on July 29th. Would I not have the right to
make a federal case out of what began as a seat belt offense and
change the jurisdiction to the USA?

A far better example is what happened on June 24th. A man who claimed
represent the Crown as the Sergeant at Arms in the New Brunswick
legislature claimed that he and the Fredericton PD had jurisdiction
over me and the right to throw me out of the public building. However
when I tried to give them this stuff as the Deputy Prime Minister Anne
McLellan and Attorney General Brad Green have both suggested, they
refused. What right did they have to do so? Should I file a complaint
against the Crown in the USA? I was thrown out of a building in NB.
Who defends the Crown if not Green?

Senator Day, make certain that Jack Hooper of CSIS sends someone to
see the priest, Bill Elliott and get the stuff I gave to him the night
of his debate on June 21st. Everybody in the churchyard watched that
old man holler at me as I gave it to him. Now Mr. Waldman can listen
to what Mr. Harper was harping about on June 22nd on the CBC, As I
told the priest there were three original wiretap tapes within that
envelope I gave him. The tapes are important evidence for the Arar
Commission. If nothing else their mere existence proves how far the
FEDS in two countries will go to cover things up. Let me know if the
priest denies he got them or Hooper won’t give them up, I have several
more hidden in Canada that the Arar Commission can have. Hooper can
hoop and holler about National Security all he wants. I must protect
my ass if he won’t, If you look at the photo I have provided, you will
see me talking to a RCMP officer that was guarding Harper in Sussex on
June 19th. Now you know what I was talking about to him. What I want
to know is that cop’s name. Harper wasn’t long spilling the beans to
his political advantage on CBC but his lawyers weren’t long shutting
him up on June 24th after Waldman demanded that he testify at the
Inquiry. Why is that?

Waldman should have known of me if Arar’s lawyers at CCR in the USA
had kept him properly informed. Rest assured that I did as soon as I
became aware of him. During our conversation I know I said enough for
him to check my words. His silence spoke volumes.

Mr. Arar’s lawyers had no fear of filing a complaint against Ashcroft
and the others in the USA after they received my stuff last November.
I see no further progress with that suit since it was filed last
January. Why have they ignored me? Did they make a deal and settle?
Why have they fallen so silent within the inquiry in Canada?

If you don’t believe me about what Mr. Harper knows, call Arthur
Hamilton and ask him about the little talk we had about this a little
while ago. Mr. Hamilton can never say he doesn’t know because I saved
his voicemail to me. I have no doubt that he has had a long talk with
our new MP Rob Moore by now. Why are they so silent?

I have many questions to ask Geoff Regan and Anne McLellan about the
Arar Commission. Geoff has no time to return my call but lots of time
to golf with Clinton and McKenna. I demand to know if the many
documents that caused the delay in the inquiry were mine. If not, why
not? I did do as Anne McLellan suggested and gave this stuff to both
Customs and Immigration the instant I landed in Canadian jurisdiction.
If I am not called to testify, I will never understand. I did manage
to talk to Veena Verma and she had no answers for me only arguments
about jurisdiction as usual.

Your friend, Mr. Zed can never say he don’t know because as you can
see I served his law office this stuff on June 25th the day before he
and John Herron greeted Paul Martin at the airport. After your review
of this stuff you must confess it is obvious to all why Paul Zed and
his friend Frank McKenna have been struck so dumb. Paul Zed was
elected to speak for that politically minded priest amongst others,
correct? Perhaps after they voted according to their conscience they
should act according to it as well.

I know that I have proved what everybody knows. The word of a lawyer
is worthless. Peter MacKay also proved that to all the true
Progressive Conservatives in Canada. The fact that another lawyer,
John Crosbie advised the former Alliance party on what to say is too
funny and sad for the words of this letter. One reason I came home and
ran for Parliament is to sooth my own soul because I found Mr. Harper
and his buddies to be a truly dangerous bunch of characters. Crosbie
did too for awhile anyway. Ain’t it funny how he now sings a different
tune? There is no doubt that the old lawyer Paul Martin is a
monumental a crook. The boat in Sidney proved that to me two days
after the election. He can play well within Mulroney’s league. It was
truly sad that so many Canadians were compelled to vote for Martin
simply because they were too scared that Harper may lead our country
down a garden path and under an evil Bush.

Perhaps the NDP should check my work closely and then help me expose
all the crooks in both the Liberal and Conservative camps. I will give
this stuff to their local lawyer leader Ms. Weir. Maybe it is time for
the NDP to shine for the benefit of all Canadians. Even though the NDP
have only 19 seats in Parliament I believe they have the power to
inspire a non-confidence vote and cause another election. I think the
NDP politicians should think about the following statement a long time
then review how they made out in the last election. I did say at the
Moss Glen debate that the NDP party was the best spot to place a vote.
However NDP people I know argued with me saying that if they did that
their vote would be wasted and Harper might get in, so they must vote
out of fear for a Liberal. Therefore I fall back on what I had said
during the Hampton debate in that every ballot should have one more
line on it "None of the above" then I am certain many more Canadians
would exercise their right to vote. Many did agree.

Senator Day I did come across your wife in the Canada Elections office
as she worked in support of Herron. Please don’t deny the fact that
the person seated beside your wife in Hampton laughed and applauded at
many of my remarks, Everybody heard what I said to Herron in front of
Rob Moore about suing him. Herron is foolish if he thought I was
kidding. Herron is a layman with few political friends. I spoke to him
very openly and honestly after the debate in Moss Glen. It should be
interesting to see whom he and Rob Moore manage to hire for lawyers to
defend them from my actions. I look forward to meeting a judge but I
am not certain I would be allowed a jury of my peers. Lawyers do have
an unfair stranglehold on Canadian justice. As you check my work, you
should see that I am out to shame all lawyers and the political ones
in particular. None of this would have been necessary if just one
lawyer had upheld their oath or one public servant had blown the
whistle. Why is not the question. The answer is Filthy Lucre.

Today is Friday the 13th. I am expected to stand in court in Boston
and argue allegations of criminal harassment made against me by a
lawyer who has practiced crimes against me. Clearly I am not making an
appearance. My kids and I will remain in this jurisdiction. I suspect
foul play and that it is a ploy to make me return to the USA. I have
little doubt that agents of the DHS would never allow me to appear in
that court. I notified everyone down in Boston that I look forward to
trial. Monday will tell the tale.

In closing I must say I considered myself a raging success to finally
break surface in the media and in an Irving owned newspaper of all
places. A former Irving lawyer needs no explanation as to the reason
for my joy. That said, let’s see if I can make the Internet work for
me in a grassroots sort of way. The Irvings are a little behind the
times in that regard. Although I do not wear a blue coat, I did give
the folks in Fundy one last chance to vote for a PC (Pissed off
Candidate) and I tried to do it in a fun fashion so that my efforts
would be remembered. Read the Kings County Record again to check my
words. As I watch the boob tube, I find the most honest reporting of
the political circus in America can be found on the Canadian comedy
shows. The stuff on Barack Obama, Ralph Nader, Melanie Sloan and the
Clintons should be pretty funny to you as well as you read the
documents I have provided. Now all I can say is Hooray for Canada and
thanks to the folks in Fundy that did vote for me. I am glad that at
least one percent understood and agreed with me. Quite likely not one
of them was a lawyer. Now I only need one lawyer in the right place in
government to do the right thing and things will change for the
better. Until that happens I will continue torturing lawyers with
dilemmas that a simple application of ethics could easily solve. It is
just a matter of time before one will break rank with the crooks and
become a truly honourable hero for the common man. As I said in my
first political speech I am a son of the Keith Clan whose roots can be
found in Fundy. Although I have separated myself from that Clan and
founded my own in order to declare a Blood Feud in my own name, I will
always honour from whence I came. I simply don’t care what lawyers or
politicians think of me Although I have no religion, I have faith in
my forefather’s motto "Veritas Vincit".

So what say you now, Senator Joe Day? Are you with me or against me?
Ignoring me just won’t do. Please send your answer to the following
address just as Brad Green did. I don’t know where I will be from day
to day these days. Like it or not you are all now witnesses to my sad
complaints. I demand an answer from you in writing even if it is to
refuse this demand to do your job. Your friend the Yankee lawyer,
David Lutz can turn his back on me then sneak away and try to hide but
you are a Canadian public servant now. You must answer me in a timely
fashion. I am part of the Canadian Public and a citizen that came to
your office in the constituency that I have been hanging my hat for
over two months. I demand assistance from the Senator appointed to
watch over us and expect you to act with the integrity that is
mandated by your license to practice law for a fee. Trust me, I am
wise to the delaying and denying game. Forget trying to argue
jurisdiction. I am here. What do you think? Should I run for Senator
if Lord manages to call an election for one? I can be reached by local
phone # 506 434-1379 but everything I say from here on out I want
recorded in the Public Record because it appears that lawyers think I
must sue the Queen in the USA. Do you think she will get pissed? The
reason question is can she afford the relief. Check the bottom line of
my first two complaints. Anne McLellan has made the Crown a
conspirator against me. Methinks she owes me three times the loss. Now
we all know the reason for the cover up. Too many lawyer/politicians
in Boston assisted the lawyer, Charles J. Kickham Jr. assist the ex
FBI agent William J. Kickham in his crimes against my Clan.

If any of the above named parties don’t like anything I have stated,
Please sue me. I dare ya. I promise I will not file any sort of motion
to dismiss the matter but I will demand a jury. I will call many
witnesses in my defense. I think the first one would be Mr. Harper.
Wouldn’t it be fun if he was a hostile one?

Cya’ll in CourtJ

David R. Amos
153 Alvin Ave.
Milton, MA. 02186
Certificate of Service

I, David R. Amos, a Canadian citizen presently within the jurisdiction
of the Province of New Brunswick in the County of Kings on Friday the
13th of August, 2004 delivered the above named material to the office
of Senator Joseph A. Day at 14 Everett St. Hampton, NB. I will also
email many people in many places the proof that this was done on this
day. Check into my beefs with the USPS and look at the news about the
Canadian Postal Service’s political issues with Paul Martin today and
it should be obvious why this is necessary for me to do in person.

>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:34 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: jmwilson@mta.ca, alaina@alainalockhart.ca,
> stephanie.coburn@greenparty.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> http://james4fundyroyal.weebly.com/
>
> https://alainalockhart.liberal.ca/
>
>
> http://www.greenparty.ca/en/content/federal-council-new-brunswick-stephanie-coburn
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:16 PM
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: Saint Croix Courier <editor@stcroixcourier.ca>, Duncan Matheson <
> duncan@bissettmatheson.com>, infoacadie@radio-canada.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
>
> *
> https://player.fm/series/shift-nb/nursing-home-policy-change-and-federal-election
> <
> https://player.fm/series/shift-nb/nursing-home-policy-change-and-federal-election
>>*
>
> Michelle LeBlanc, Vern Faulkner and Duncan Matheson look at the big
> political stories of the week. - See more at:
> https://player.fm/series/shift-nb/nursing-home-policy-change-and-federal-election#sthash.RYRFiC5P.dpuf
>
> https://twitter.com/mleblanc_RC
> Keep up with Duncan
>
> 506-457-1627
>
>
> *Editor:* Vern Faulkner
> Phone: (506) 466-3220 ext. 1307; CELL (506) 467-5203
> Email: editor@stcroixcourier.ca
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:18:04 -0300
> Subject: Fwd: Here is my latest complaint about the SEC, Banksters and
> Taxmen
> To: nicolas@allvotes.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,  brendan@brendanmiles.ca
> Cc: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>, Tim.Moen@libertarian.ca,
> info@democraticadvancementparty.ca
>
> ENJOY
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/281544801/Federal-Court-Seal
>
> https://www.scribd.com/doc/281442628/Me-Versus-the-Crown
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 18:22:05 -0400
> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 Did you order Harper and
> the NDP to ignore me as well???
> To: Liberal / Assistance <nbd_cna@liberal.ca>, cmunroe@glgmlaw.com, pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>, "justin.trudeau.a1"<justin.trudeau.a1@parl.gc.ca>
, mcu
> <mcu@justice.gc.ca>
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>
> How about Dizzy Lizzy May and the Bloc?
>
> On 1/6/16, Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance) <nbd_cna@liberal.ca> wrote:
>
> ---------- Original message ----------
> From: "Cmunroe (Liberal / Assistance)"<nbd_cna@liberal.ca>
> Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 19:28:25 +0000
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
> I am before the cour...
> To: Motomaniac333 <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>
> RealChange.ca | DuVraiChangement.ca
>
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Cmunroe, Jan 6, 14:28
>
> Hello all,
>
> I would ask that you please do not respond to this e-mail (in the
> event that you were inclined to do so.)
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
>
> Regards,
>
> Craig Munroe
> (Party Legal and Constitutional Advisor)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Amos [mailto:motomaniac333@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 11:09 AM
> To: Craig Munroe <cmunroe@glgmlaw.com>; nbd_cna@liberal.ca; pm
> <pm@pm.gc.ca>; ljulien@liberal.ca; pmilliken <pmilliken@cswan.com>;
> bdysart <bdysart@smss.com>; bdysart <bdysart@stewartmckelvey.com>;
> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca; robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com;
> jda@nf.aibn.com; eclark@coxandpalmer.com; office@liberal.ns.ca;
> president@lpco.ca; david@lpcm.ca; emerchant@merchantlaw.com
> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>; assistance@liberal.ca;
> Karine Fortin <info@ndp.ca>; stephen.harper
> <stephen.harper.a1@parl.gc.ca>
> Subject: Re: Attn Dr. John Gillis Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15
> Trust that I called and tried to reason with a lot of Liberals begore
> I am before the court again on Monday Jan 11th
>
> On 1/6/16, David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> wrote:
>> BTW the nice guys who talked to me and didn't dismiss me I put in the
>> BCC line
>>
>> Dr. John Gillis
>> P.O. Box 723
>> 5151 George Street, Suite 1400
>> Halifax, Nova Scotia
>> Canada B3J 2T3
>> Tel: (902) 429-1993
>> Email: office@liberal.ns.ca
>>
>> John Allan, President
>> Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador
>> T: (709) 685-1230
>> jda@nf.aibn.com
>>
>>
>> Braeden Caley
>> Office of the Mayor, City of Vancouver
>>  604-809-9951
>> Braeden.Caley@vancouver.ca,
>>
>>
>> Britt Dysart QC
>> Suite 600, Frederick Square
>> 77 Westmorland Street
>> P.O. Box 730
>> Fredericton, NB, Canada
>> E3B 5B4
>>
>> P 506.443.0153
>> F 506.443.9948
>>
>>
>> Evatt F. A. Merchant
>> Merchant Law Group LLP
>> First Nations Bank Bldg.
>> 501-224 4th Ave. S.
>> Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7K 5M5
>> Phone: 306-653-7777
>> Email: emerchant@merchantlaw.com
>>
>>
>> Ewan W. Clark
>> Montague
>> Phone: (902) 838-5275
>> Fax: (902) 838-3440
>> eclark@coxandpalmer.com
>>
>> Robert M. Schuett
>> #200, 602 11th Avenue SW
>> Calgary Alberta T2R 1J8
>> Phone: (403) 705-1261
>> Fax: (403) 705-1265
>> robert.m.schuett@schuettlaw.com
>>
>>
>> http://www.liberal.ca/national-board-of-directors/
>>
>> Who are we?
>>
>> We are volunteers from across the country who care passionately about
>> Canada’s future and promoting Liberal values. We are community
>> leaders, parents, and professionals who volunteer our time in this
>> role. The board works together to provide oversight and guidance to
>> the Party in matters both fiduciary, and strategic. We meet regularly
>> in person and by phone with the objective of ensuring the Party is
>> prepared for the next federal election. It is an honour to work with
>> such a distinct and talented group of individuals. Please don’t
>> hesitate to reach out to us at nbd_cna@liberal.ca.
>> Anna Gainey
>>
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada
>>
>> T @annamgainey
>> Leader        Justin Trudeau
>> National President    Anna Gainey
>> Acting National Director      Christina Topp
>> National Vice-President (English)     Chris MacInnes
>> National Vice-President (French)      Marie Tremblay
>> National Policy Chair         Maryanne Kampouris
>> National Membership Secretary         Leanne Bourassa
>> Past National President       Mike Crawley
>> President, Liberal Party of Newfoundland & Labrador   John Allan
>> President, Liberal Party of Prince Edward Island      Ewan Clark
>> President, Nova Scotia Liberal Party  John Gillis
>> President, New Brunswick Liberal Association  Britt Dysart
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Québec)   Linda Julien
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Ontario)  Tyler Banham
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Manitoba)         Sachit Mehra
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Saskatchewan)     Evatt Merchant
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Alberta)  Robbie Schuett
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (British Columbia)         Braeden
>> Caley
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Yukon       Blake Rogers
>> President, Liberal Party of Canada (Northwest Territories)    Rosanna
>> Nicol
>> President, Federal Liberal Association of Nunavut     Michel Potvin
>> Caucus Representative         Francis Scarpaleggia
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Female)     Caitlin Tolley
>> Co-Chair, Aboriginal Peoples’ Commission (Male)       Kevin Seesequasis
>> President, National Women’s Liberal Commission        Carlene Variyan
>> President, Young Liberals of Canada   Justin Kaiser
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (French)        Anne Adams
>> Co-Chair, Senior Liberals’ Commission (English)       Kenneth D. Halliday
>> Chair, Council of Presidents  Veena Bhullar
>> Chief Financial Officer       Chuck Rifici
>> Chief Revenue Officer         Stephen Bronfman
>> CEO, Federal Liberal Agency of Canada         Mike Eizenga
>> National Campaign Co-Chair    Katie Telford
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (English)    Craig Munroe
>> Constitutional and Legal Adviser (French)     Elise Bartlett
>>
>> Craig T. Munroe, Partner
>> Email: cmunroe@glgmlaw.com
>> Phone: (604) 891-1176
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
>> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 19:32:00 -0400
>> Subject: Re Federal Court File No: T-1557-15 the CBC, the RCMP, their
>> new boss Justin Trudeau and his Ministers of Justice and Defence etc
>> cannot deny their knowledge of Paragraphs 81, 82, 83, 84, and 85 now
>> CORRECT G$?
>> To: Paul.Samyn@freepress.mb.ca, "carolyn.bennett"
>> <carolyn.bennett@parl.gc.ca>, Doug@dougeyolfson.ca,
>> doug.eyolfson@parl.gc.ca, fpcity@freepress.mb.ca,
>> w.kinew@uwinnipeg.ca, "Paul.Lynch"<Paul.Lynch@edmontonpolice.ca>,
>> "Marianne.Ryan"<Marianne.Ryan@rcmp-grc.gc.ca>, sunrayzulu
>> <sunrayzulu@shaw.ca>, mcu <mcu@justice.gc.ca>, dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca,
>> "john.green"<john.green@gnb.ca>, chiefape <chiefape@gmail.com>
>> Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>, gopublic
>> <gopublic@cbc.ca>, oldmaison <oldmaison@yahoo.com>, radical
>> <radical@radicalpress.com>, newsonline <newsonline@bbc.co.uk>,
>> newsroom <newsroom@globeandmail.ca>, nmoore <nmoore@bellmedia.ca>,
>> andre <andre@jafaust.com>
>>
>> http://davidraymondamos3.blogspot.ca/2015/09/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.
>> html
>>
>> David Raymond Amos Versus The Crown T-1557-15
>>
>> 81.  The Plaintiff states that matters of harassment that the police
>> refuse to investigate would have entered the realm of ridiculous in
>> 2012 if the reasons behind the suicides of teenagers did not become
>> well known by the corporate media. In the summer of 2012 a new member
>> of the FPS who as a former member of the EPS had inspired a lawsuit
>> for beating a client in Edmonton called the Plaintiff and accused him
>> of something he could not do even if he wanted to while he was arguing
>> many lawyers byway of emails about a matter concerning cyber stalking
>> that was before the SCC.  The member of the FPF accused the Plaintiff
>> of calling the boss of Bullying Canada thirty times. At that time his
>> MagicJack account had been hacked and although he could receive
>> incoming calls, the Plaintiff could not call out to anyone. The
>> Plaintiff freely sent the FPF his telephone logs sourced from
>> MagicJack after his account restored without the Crown having to issue
>> a warrant to see his telephone records. He asked the FPF and the RCMP
>> where did the records of his phone calls to and from the FPF and the
>> RCMP go if his account had not been hacked. The police never
>> responded. Years later a Troll sent Dean Roger Ray a message through
>> YouTube providing info about the Plaintiff’s MagicJack account with
>> the correct password. Dean Roger Ray promptly posted two videos in
>> YouTube clearly displaying the blatant violation of privacy likely to
>> protect himself from the crime. The Plaintiff quickly pointed out the
>> videos to the RCMP and they refused to investigate as usual. At about
>> the same point in time the Plaintiff noticed that the CBC had
>> published a record of a access to information requests. On the list of
>> requests he saw his name along with several employees of CBC and the
>> boss of Bullying Canada. The Plaintiff called the CBC to make
>> inquiries about what he saw published on the Internet. CBC told him it
>> was none of his business and advised him if he thought his rights had
>> been offended to file a complaint. It appears the Plaintiff that
>> employees of CBC like other questionable Crown Corporations such as
>> the RCMP rely on their attorneys far too much to defend them from
>> litigation they invite from citizens they purportedly serve. The
>> employees of CBC named within the aforementioned and the CBC Legal
>> Dept. are very familiar with the Plaintiff and of the Crown barring
>> him from legislative properties while he running for public office.
>>
>> 82.  The Plaintiff states that any politician or police officer should
>> have seen enough of Barry Winter’s WordPress blog by June 22, 2015
>> particularly after the very unnecessary demise of two men in Alberta
>> because of the incompetence of the EPS. Barry Winters was blogging
>> about the EPS using battering ram in order to execute a warrant for a
>> 250 dollar bylaw offence at the same time Professor Kris Wells
>> revealed in a televised interview that the EPS member who was killed
>> was the one investigating the cyber harassment of him. It was obvious
>> why the police and politicians ignored all the death threats, sexual
>> harassment, cyberbullying and hate speech of a proud Zionist who
>> claimed to be a former CF officer who now working for the Department
>> of National Defence (DND). It is well known that no politician in
>> Canada is allowed to sit in Parliament as a member of the major
>> parties unless they support Israel. Since 2002 the Plaintiff made it
>> well known that he does not support Israeli actions and was against
>> the American plan to make war on Iraq. On Aril 1, 2003 within two
>> weeks of the beginning of the War on Iraq, the US Secret Service
>> threatened to practice extraordinary rendition because false
>> allegations of a Presidential threat were made against him by an
>> American court. However, the Americans and the Crown cannot deny that
>> what he said in two courts on April 1, 2003 because he published the
>> recordings of what was truly said as soon as he got the court tapes.
>> The RCMP knows those words can still be heard on the Internet today.
>> In 2009, the Plaintiff began to complain of Barry Winters about
>> something far more important to Canada as nation because of Winters’
>> bragging of being one of 24 CF officers who assisted the Americans in
>> the planning the War on Iraq in 2002. In the Plaintiff’s humble
>> opinion the mandate of the DND is Defence not Attack. He is not so
>> naive to think that such plans of war do not occur but if Barry
>> Winters was in fact one of the CF officers who did so then he broke
>> his oath to the Crown the instant he bragged of it in his blog. If
>> Winters was never an officer in the CF then he broke the law by
>> impersonating an officer. The Plaintiff downloaded the emails of the
>> Privy Council about Wikileaks. The bragging of Barry Winters should
>> have been investigated in 2009 before CBC reported that documents
>> released by WikiLeaks supported his information about Canadian
>> involvement in the War on Iraq.
>>
>> 83.  The Plaintiff states that now that Canada is involved in more war
>> in Iraq again it did not serve Canadian interests and reputation to
>> allow Barry Winters to publish the following words three times over
>> five years after he began his bragging:
>>
>> January 13, 2015
>> This Is Just AS Relevant Now As When I wrote It During The Debate
>>
>> December 8, 2014
>> Why Canada Stood Tall!
>>
>> Friday, October 3, 2014
>> Little David Amos’ “True History Of War” Canadian Airstrikes And
>> Stupid Justin Trudeau
>>
>> Canada’s and Canadians free ride is over. Canada can no longer hide
>> behind Amerka’s and NATO’s skirts.
>>
>> When I was still in Canadian Forces then Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> actually committed the Canadian Army to deploy in the second campaign
>> in Iraq, the Coalition of the Willing. This was against or contrary to
>> the wisdom or advice of those of us Canadian officers that were
>> involved in the initial planning phases of that operation. There were
>> significant concern in our planning cell, and NDHQ about of the dearth
>> of concern for operational guidance, direction, and forces for
>> operations after the initial occupation of Iraq. At the “last minute”
>> Prime Minister Chretien and the Liberal government changed its mind.
>> The Canadian government told our amerkan cousins that we would not
>> deploy combat troops for the Iraq campaign, but would deploy a
>> Canadian Battle Group to Afghanistan, enabling our amerkan cousins to
>> redeploy troops from there to Iraq. The PMO’s thinking that it was
>> less costly to deploy Canadian Forces to Afghanistan than Iraq. But
>> alas no one seems to remind the Liberals of Prime Minister Chretien’s
>> then grossly incorrect assumption. Notwithstanding Jean Chretien’s
>> incompetence and stupidity, the Canadian Army was heroic,
>> professional, punched well above it’s weight, and the PPCLI Battle
>> Group, is credited with “saving Afghanistan” during the Panjway
>> campaign of 2006.
>>
>> What Justin Trudeau and the Liberals don’t tell you now, is that then
>> Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chretien committed, and deployed the
>> Canadian army to Canada’s longest “war” without the advice, consent,
>> support, or vote of the Canadian Parliament.
>>
>> What David Amos and the rest of the ignorant, uneducated, and babbling
>> chattering classes are too addled to understand is the deployment of
>> less than 75 special operations troops, and what is known by planners
>> as a “six pac cell” of fighter aircraft is NOT the same as a
>> deployment of a Battle Group, nor a “war” make.
>>
>> The Canadian Government or The Crown unlike our amerkan cousins have
>> the “constitutional authority” to commit the Canadian nation to war.
>> That has been recently clearly articulated to the Canadian public by
>> constitutional scholar Phillippe Legasse. What Parliament can do is
>> remove “confidence” in The Crown’s Government in a “vote of
>> non-confidence.” That could not happen to the Chretien Government
>> regarding deployment to Afghanistan, and it won’t happen in this
>> instance with the conservative majority in The Commons regarding a
>> limited Canadian deployment to the Middle East.
>>
>> President George Bush was quite correct after 911 and the terror
>> attacks in New York; that the Taliban “occupied” and “failed state”
>> Afghanistan was the source of logistical support, command and control,
>> and training for the Al Quaeda war of terror against the world. The
>> initial defeat, and removal from control of Afghanistan was vital and
>> essential for the security and tranquility of the developed world. An
>> ISIS “caliphate,” in the Middle East, no matter how small, is a clear
>> and present danger to the entire world. This “occupied state,”
>> or“failed state” will prosecute an unending Islamic inspired war of
>> terror against not only the “western world,” but Arab states
>> “moderate” or not, as well. The security, safety, and tranquility of
>> Canada and Canadians are just at risk now with the emergence of an
>> ISIS“caliphate” no matter how large or small, as it was with the
>> Taliban and Al Quaeda “marriage” in Afghanistan.
>>
>> One of the everlasting “legacies” of the “Trudeau the Elder’s dynasty
>> was Canada and successive Liberal governments cowering behind the
>> amerkan’s nuclear and conventional military shield, at the same time
>> denigrating, insulting them, opposing them, and at the same time
>> self-aggrandizing ourselves as “peace keepers,” and progenitors of
>> “world peace.” Canada failed. The United States of Amerka, NATO, the
>> G7 and or G20 will no longer permit that sort of sanctimonious
>> behavior from Canada or its government any longer. And Prime Minister
>> Stephen Harper, Foreign Minister John Baird , and Cabinet are fully
>> cognizant of that reality. Even if some editorial boards, and pundits
>> are not.
>>
>> Justin, Trudeau “the younger” is reprising the time “honoured” liberal
>> mantra, and tradition of expecting the amerkans or the rest of the
>> world to do “the heavy lifting.” Justin Trudeau and his “butt buddy”
>> David Amos are telling Canadians that we can guarantee our security
>> and safety by expecting other nations to fight for us. That Canada can
>> and should attempt to guarantee Canadians safety by providing
>> “humanitarian aid” somewhere, and call a sitting US president a “war
>> criminal.” This morning Australia announced they too, were sending
>> tactical aircraft to eliminate the menace of an ISIS “caliphate.”
>>
>> In one sense Prime Minister Harper is every bit the scoundrel Trudeau
>> “the elder” and Jean ‘the crook” Chretien was. Just As Trudeau, and
>> successive Liberal governments delighted in diminishing,
>> marginalizing, under funding Canadian Forces, and sending Canadian
>> military men and women to die with inadequate kit and modern
>> equipment; so too is Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Canada’s F-18s are
>> antiquated, poorly equipped, and ought to have been replaced five
>> years ago. But alas, there won’t be single RCAF fighter jock that
>> won’t go, or won’t want to go, to make Canada safe or safer.
>>
>> My Grandfather served this country. My father served this country. My
>> Uncle served this country. And I have served this country. Justin
>> Trudeau has not served Canada in any way. Thomas Mulcair has not
>> served this country in any way. Liberals and so called social
>> democrats haven’t served this country in any way. David Amos, and
>> other drooling fools have not served this great nation in any way. Yet
>> these fools are more than prepared to ensure their, our safety to
>> other nations, and then criticize them for doing so.
>>
>> Canada must again, now, “do our bit” to guarantee our own security,
>> and tranquility, but also that of the world. Canada has never before
>> shirked its responsibility to its citizens and that of the world.
>>
>> Prime Minister Harper will not permit this country to do so now
>>
>> From: dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 14:17:17 -0400
>> Subject: RE: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and
>> the War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still
>> alive
>> To: david.raymond.amos@gmail.com
>>
>> This is to confirm that the Minister of National Defence has received
>> your email and it will be reviewed in due course. Please do not reply
>> to this message: it is an automatic acknowledgement.
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original message ----------
>> From: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
>> Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:55:30 -0300
>> Subject: Re Greg Weston, The CBC , Wikileaks, USSOCOM, Canada and the
>> War in Iraq (I just called SOCOM and let them know I was still alive
>> To: DECPR@forces.gc.ca, Public.Affairs@socom.mil,
>> Raymonde.Cleroux@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, john.adams@cse-cst.gc.ca,
>> william.elliott@rcmp-grc.gc.ca, stoffp1 <stoffp1@parl.gc.ca>,
>> dnd_mdn@forces.gc.ca, media@drdc-rddc.gc.ca, information@forces.gc.ca,
>> milner@unb.ca, charters@unb.ca, lwindsor@unb.ca,
>> sarah.weir@mpcc-cppm.gc.ca, birgir <birgir@althingi.is>, smari
>> <smari@immi.is>, greg.weston@cbc.ca, pm <pm@pm.gc.ca>,
>> susan@blueskystrategygroup.com, Don@blueskystrategygroup.com,
>> eugene@blueskystrategygroup.com, americas@aljazeera.net
>> Cc: "Edith. Cody-Rice"<Edith.Cody-Rice@cbc.ca>, "terry.seguin"
>> <terry.seguin@cbc.ca>, acampbell <acampbell@ctv.ca>, whistleblower
>> <whistleblower@ctv.ca>
>>
>> I talked to Don Newman earlier this week before the beancounters David
>> Dodge and Don Drummond now of Queen's gave their spin about Canada's
>> Health Care system yesterday and Sheila Fraser yapped on and on on
>> CAPAC during her last days in office as if she were oh so ethical.. To
>> be fair to him I just called Greg Weston (613-288-6938) I suggested
>> that he should at least Google SOUCOM and David Amos It would be wise
>> if he check ALL of CBC's sources before he publishes something else
>> about the DND EH Don Newman? Lets just say that the fact  that  your
>> old CBC buddy, Tony Burman is now in charge of Al Jazeera English
>> never impressed me. The fact that he set up a Canadian office is
>> interesting though
>>
>> http://www.blueskystrategygroup.com/index.php/team/don-newman/
>>
>> http://www.cbc.ca/news/arts/media/story/2010/05/04/al-jazeera-english-
>> launch.html
>>
>> Anyone can call me back and stress test my integrity after they read
>> this simple pdf file. BTW what you Blue Sky dudes pubished about
>> Potash Corp and BHP is truly funny. Perhaps Stevey Boy Harper or Brad
>> Wall will fill ya in if you are to shy to call mean old me.
>>
>> http://www.scribd.com/doc/2718120/Integrity-Yea-Right
>>
>> The Governor General, the PMO and the PCO offices know that I am not a
>> shy political animal
>>
>> Veritas Vincit
>> David Raymond Amos
>> 902 800 0369
>>
>> Enjoy Mr Weston
>> http://www.cbc.ca/m/touch/news/story/2011/05/15/weston-iraq-invasion-w
>> ikileaks.html
>>
>> "But Lang, defence minister McCallum's chief of staff, says military
>> brass were not entirely forthcoming on the issue. For instance, he
>> says, even McCallum initially didn't know those soldiers were helping
>> to plan the invasion of Iraq up to the highest levels of command,
>> including a Canadian general.
>>
>> That general is Walt Natynczyk, now Canada's chief of defence staff,
>> who eight months after the invasion became deputy commander of 35,000
>> U.S. soldiers and other allied forces in Iraq. Lang says Natynczyk was
>> also part of the team of mainly senior U.S. military brass that helped
>> prepare for the invasion from a mobile command in Kuwait."
>>
>> http://baconfat53.blogspot.com/2010/06/canada-and-united-states.html
>>
>> "I remember years ago when the debate was on in Canada, about there
>> being weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Our American 'friends"
>> demanded that Canada join into "the Coalition of the Willing. American
>> "veterans" and sportscasters loudly denounced Canada for NOT buying
>> into the US policy.
>>
>> At the time I was serving as a planner at NDHQ and with 24 other of my
>> colleagues we went to Tampa SOUCOM HQ to be involved in the planning
>> in the planning stages of the op....and to report to NDHQ, that would
>> report to the PMO upon the merits of the proposed operation. There was
>> never at anytime an existing target list of verified sites where there
>> were deployed WMD.
>>
>> Coalition assets were more than sufficient for the initial strike and
>> invasion phase but even at that point in the planning, we were
>> concerned about the number of "boots on the ground" for the occupation
>> (and end game) stage of an operation in Iraq. We were also concerned
>> about the American plans for occupation plans of Iraq because they at
>> that stage included no contingency for a handing over of civil
>> authority to a vetted Iraqi government and bureaucracy.
>>
>> There was no detailed plan for Iraq being "liberated" and returned to
>> its people...nor a thought to an eventual exit plan. This was contrary
>> to the lessons of Vietnam but also to current military thought, that
>> folks like Colin Powell and "Stuffy" Leighton and others elucidated
>> upon. "What's the mission" how long is the mission, what conditions
>> are to met before US troop can redeploy?  Prime Minister Jean Chretien
>> and the PMO were even at the very preliminary planning stages wary of
>> Canadian involvement in an Iraq operation....History would prove them
>> correct. The political pressure being applied on the PMO from the
>> George W Bush administration was onerous
>>
>> American military assets were extremely overstretched, and Canadian
>> military assets even more so It was proposed by the PMO that Canadian
>> naval platforms would deploy to assist in naval quarantine operations
>> in the Gulf and that Canadian army assets would deploy in Afghanistan
>> thus permitting US army assets to redeploy for an Iraqi
>> operation....The PMO thought that "compromise would save Canadian
>> lives and liberal political capital.. and the priority of which
>> ....not necessarily in that order. "
>>
>> You can bet that I called these sneaky Yankees again today EH John
>> Adams? of the CSE within the DND?
>>
>> http://www.socom.mil/SOCOMHome/Pages/ContactUSSOCOM.aspx
>>
>>
>> 84.  The Plaintiff states that the RCMP is well aware that he went to
>> western Canada in 2104 at the invitation of a fellow Maritimer in
>> order to assist in his attempt to investigate the murders of many
>> people in Northern BC. The Plaintiff has good reasons to doubt his
>> fellow Maritimer’s motives. The fact that he did not tell the
>> Plaintiff until he had arrived in BC that he had invited a Neo Nazi he
>> knew the Plaintiff strongly disliked to the same protest that he was
>> staging in front of the court house in Prince George on August 21,
>> 2014. The Plaintiff was looking forward to meeting Lonnie Landrud so
>> he ignored the Neo Nazi. Several months after their one and only
>> meeting, Lonnie Landrud contacted the Plaintiff and asked him to
>> publish a statement of his on the Internet and to forward it to anyone
>> he wished. The Plaintiff obliged Landrud and did an investigation of
>> his own as well. He has informed the RCMP of his opinion of their
>> actions and has done nothing further except monitor the criminal
>> proceedings the Crown has placed against the Neo Nazi in BC and save
>> his videos and webpages and that of his associates. The words the
>> Plaintiff stated in public in P...

[Message clipped]  View entire message

4 attachments— Scan and download all attachments

Joe Day.pdf 299K View as HTMLScan and download

Speaker Iceland etc.pdf 970K View as HTMLScan and download

Andy Scott Indians.pdf 28K View as HTMLScan and download

Integrity_yea_right.pdf 961K View as HTMLScan and download