https://www.rebelnews.com/jim_karahalios_addresses_the_infighting_among_the_convoys_leadership
Jim Karahalios addresses the infighting among the convoy's leadership
The leader of the New Blue Party of Ontario was serving as legal counsel for one of the Freedom Convoy organizers, Benjamin Dichter, and touches on the disagreements between Dichter and others involved in the protest.
In a surprise to some viewers who have been following along with the Public Order Emergency Commission, the co-founder and leader of the New Blue Party of Ontario, Jim Karahalios, appeared at the public inquiry to represent Benjamin Dichter, one of the Freedom Convoy organizers, during his testimony.
The inquiry, which we here at Rebel News are calling the Trucker Commission, is a mandatory investigation into Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's invoking of the Emergencies Act, the never-before-used successor to the former War Measures Act. Trudeau used this extreme legislation this past February in an attempt to crush the peaceful convoy protesters after they'd demonstrated in Ottawa for nearly a month.
In today's report, we'll bring you an interview with Karahalios following his appearance at the commission. As one of the early organizers behind the Freedom Convoy, Dichter was called to the stand to testify.
Karahalios, who studied law at the University of Ottawa before entering politics, spoke to us about why he decided to represnt Dichter during the convoy and his view of Freedom Corp. — a group of other key figures in the convoy which includes Tamara Lich, Chris Barber and Tom Marazzo.
The New Blue leader also touched on Dichter's relationship with Marazzo and a whole lot more. The things Dichter said, and Karahalios told Rebel News, were quite different from what Marazzo and Keith Wilson, a lawyer for the convoy, recalled during their testimonies. This tension between the convoy figures was on full display when another convoy lawyer, Brendan Miller, cross-examined Dichter.
Although the inquiry is set to continue for nearly another three weeks, Dichter and his counsel, Karahalios, were not given standing, which means they will not be allowed to cross-examine any of the other witnesses appearing in front of the commission.
It's a ruse!
Jim Karahalios<vote@jimkarahalios.ca> | Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 5:41 PM | ||||
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com> | |||||
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original | |||||
|
---------- Original message ----------
From: Premier of Ontario | Premier ministre de l’Ontario <Premier@ontario.ca>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 22:01:14 +0000
Subject: Automatic reply: Problem with PC Policy Convention I talked
to Michael Crase and he played dumb once it dawned on him he was in
over his head
To: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Thank you for your email. Your thoughts, comments and input are greatly valued.
You can be assured that all emails and letters are carefully read,
reviewed and taken into consideration.
There may be occasions when, given the issues you have raised and the
need to address them effectively, we will forward a copy of your
correspondence to the appropriate government official. Accordingly, a
response may take several business days.
Thanks again for your email.
______
Merci pour votre courriel. Nous vous sommes très reconnaissants de
nous avoir fait part de vos idées, commentaires et observations.
Nous tenons à vous assurer que nous lisons attentivement et prenons en
considération tous les courriels et lettres que nous recevons.
Dans certains cas, nous transmettrons votre message au ministère
responsable afin que les questions soulevées puissent être traitées de
la manière la plus efficace possible. En conséquence, plusieurs jours
ouvrables pourraient s’écouler avant que nous puissions vous répondre.
Merci encore pour votre courriel.
---------- Original message ----------
From: David Amos <motomaniac333@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:01:11 -0400
Subject: Re: Problem with PC Policy Convention I talked to Michael
Crase and he played dumb once it dawned on him he was in over his head
To: Tanya Granic Allen <tanya@pafe.ca>, questions@forthemembers.ca,
vote@jimkarahalios.ca, premier <premier@ontario.ca>,
"caroline.mulroneyco"<caroline.mulroneyco@pc.ola.
attorneygeneral <attorneygeneral@ontario.ca>, caroline
< caroline@carolinemulroney.ca>
Cc: David Amos <david.raymond.amos@gmail.com>
Office of the Premier <scott.moe@gov.sk.ca>, premier
< premier@gov.sk.ca>, premier <premier@gov.ab.ca>, premier
< premier@gnb.ca>, PREMIER <PREMIER@gov.ns.ca>, "blaine.higgs"
< blaine.higgs@gnb.ca>, "brian.gallant"<brian.gallant@gnb.ca>,
"David.Coon"<David.Coon@gnb.ca>, krisaustin
< krisaustin@peoplesalliance.ca
< andrew.scheer@parl.gc.ca>, "maxime.bernier"
< maxime.bernier@parl.gc.ca>
Jim Karahalios and Brian Patterson did not bother to return my calls
We shall see if they answer my emails just like YOU the Ford and
Mulroney people never did.
On 10/30/18, Tanya Granic Allen <tanya@pafe.ca> wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> In follow-up to yesterday's email (click here
> < http://www.pafe.ca/problem_
> haven’t yet), I want to update you on problematic developments with the PC
> Party Policy Convention& General Meeting taking place November 16-18 in
> Toronto.
>
> For the past few months, the policy debate and votes, and the voting on
> constitutional amendments was scheduled to take place in the daytime hours
> of Saturday, November 17.
>
> This past weekend, though, I was made aware that the Doug Ford controlled
> “Convention Committee” recently voted to make a radical change to the
> program.
>
> Now, the designated voting times for the policy proposals, constitutional
> amendments, and the executive will be taking place the next day - on SUNDAY
> morning starting at the early hour of 7am! (7am for executive elections, 9am
> for policy and constitutional amendments).
>
> Voting on policies and the executive early Sunday morning starting at 7am?!
> This isn't right.
>
> I know the PC Party is aware that pro-family delegates were elected in big
> numbers for this convention. Is this possibly why the Ford-appointed
> Convention Committee moved the voting times to when many delegates would be
> attending church services, or would otherwise have family commitments?
> According to a senior PC Party official I spoke with yesterday, the change
> in schedule was to accommodate "set-up" for the Doug Ford dinner on the
> Saturday evening.
>
> I don't think it's right that preparations for dinner with Doug Ford should
> take all day Saturday. Surely this can’t be the real reason that, with this
> last-minute change of schedule, hundreds of delegates will be now be
> inconvenienced and possibly required to miss their church services. Isn't
> Team Ford supposed to be providing a government "for the people"? Maybe it
> is the government for some people only, and not for others. And maybe this
> same ethos is being applied to how the PC Party is being run?
>
> Furthermore, it seems that most of the pro-family policy proposals have been
> omitted from the convention. The Party decided against many of our
> grassroots policies that were endorsed by party members throughout Ontario –
> policies addressing Bill 89 (kids being removed from their home if parents
> disagree with them changing their sex), Bill 28 (removing the words “mother”
> and “father” in the birth registration process), and Bill 77 (banning
> therapy for children who think they want to change their sex). The PC Party
> even censored and suppressed my policy resolutions that opposed gender
> identity theory, EVEN THOUGH, as recently as this past February, Doug Ford
> himself described gender identity theory as nothing more than “Liberal
> ideology” <https://www.youtube.com/
>
> If you are going to boast that you are going to “listen to the people”, then
> you need to listen. Omitting grassroots policies, and rearranging the voting
> time to early Sunday morning is exclusionary.
>
> Is this our new party? Or is the new Doug Ford PC Party using the old
> Patrick Brown tricks?
>
> We need to voice our concerns. I have already raised my concerns with the
> Executive Director of the Ontario PC Party – Michael Crase - in a lengthy
> conversation yesterday. Now it's your turn.
>
> At this point, I think the best persons you can approach to act on our
> behalf are the two gentlemen running for PC Party President - Jim Karahalios
> and Brian Patterson.
>
> Can you contact Brian Patterson or Jim Karahalios and ask them to do
> something? Tell them we need to bring back voting to Saturday and include
> all the grassroots policies - not just the handpicked ones that meet the
> approval of a select few.
>
> You can reach them at the following:
>
> Jim Karahalios
> vote@jimkarahalios.ca<mailto:vote@jimkarahalios.ca>
> 416-789-1555
>
> Brian Patterson
> questions@forthemembers.ca<mailto:questions@
> 416-574-5546
>
> Email me at tanya@pafe.ca<mailto:tanya@pafe.ca> and let me know what they
> say.
>
> For the family,
>
>
>
> Tanya Granic Allen, President
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your donation to Parents As First Educators (PAFE)helps us fight for
> parental rights! <https://pafe.nationbuilder.
> Please make a donation today by clicking here.
> < https://pafe.nationbuilder.
>
>
>
>
>
> -=-=-
> Parents As First Educators Inc. - Canada
> This email was sent to motomaniac333@gmail.com. To stop receiving emails:
> http://www.pafe.ca/unsubscribe
> -=-=-