Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

N.B., N.S. premiers ask Ottawa for isthmus funding, but unhappily

$
0
0
 
 

N.B., N.S. premiers ask Ottawa for isthmus funding, but unhappily

Higgs, Houston say provinces want ruling that Ottawa should pay entire $650 million cost of upgrade

But Blaine Higgs and Tim Houston say they're not accepting that Ottawa will only pay for half the project and will still go to court to argue it should cover the entire cost, now estimated at $650 million.

The two Progressive Conservative premiers have been in a war of words with the federal Liberal government for more than a year over whose responsibility it is to reinforce the road, rail and telecommunications infrastructure linking New Brunswick and Nova Scotia.

The federal government offered to fund up to half the project, and until Tuesday it wasn't clear if the two provinces would even apply for funding on that basis.

Two men sitting at a table in front of a row of flags from Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Canada. Federal Infrastructure Minister Dominic LeBlanc, left, and Higgs at the growth meeting Tuesday of federal and provincial politicians from the region. LeBlanc wouldn’t commit to funding half of the new $650 million cost estimate for the Chignecto Isthmus project. (Isabelle Arseneau/Radio-Canada)

"Yes, we will be applying for it to meet the deadlines that have been put forward," Higgs said at a news conference. 

"At the same time we will be seeking clarification and a legal interpretation of the Constitution." 

Houston said his government will file a reference case with the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal to argue that Ottawa is obligated to pay the full cost of the project. 

He said other provinces will likely intervene in that case. Reference rulings are non-binding.

Ottawa has 'dug in': Houston

"This is a nationally significant trade corridor," Houston said. "I don't believe there's disagreement on the significance of it, but I think there's a little bit of difference of opinion on who should pay. I believe it should be a priority of the federal government." 

The two premiers spoke following an Atlantic Growth Strategy meeting of federal and provincial politicians from the region.

The deadline for the two provinces to file their applications to the federal Disaster Mitigation and Adaptation Fund is 4 p.m. AT Wednesday.

"The federal government has dug in," Houston said. "They said 'No [to paying the full cost], apply under the program for half.' So we'll do that."

A map of the Chignecto Isthmus that connects New Brunswick and Nova Scotia The Chignecto Isthmus is a key transportation corridor that connects Nova Scotia to New Brunswick. The premiers for both provinces have been in a war of words with the federal Liberal government for more than a year over whose responsibility it is to reinforce the road, rail and telecommunications infrastructure. (CBC News)

An estimated $35 billion in trade each year crosses the isthmus, which is protected from the Bay of Fundy tides by dikes and an aboiteau built centuries ago.

A 2018 report found that 70 per cent of the dikes in Nova Scotia are vulnerable to a one-in-50-years storm. Sea levels in the province are projected to increase by as much as a metre by 2100.

The Trans-Canada Highway, the main Canadian National rail line and fibre optic cables all cross the isthmus not far from the water's edge. 

Isthmus upgrade 'a priority project,' LeBlanc says

Federal Infrastructure Minister Dominic LeBlanc wouldn't commit to funding half of the new $650 million cost estimate, saying the question was hypothetical because the application hasn't been filed yet.

"We will evaluate the project that they will submit," he said.

He said Ottawa will probably receive applications for billions more than what's in the disaster fund's budget, but he called the isthmus upgrade "a priority project."

 A woman with glasses and shoulder-length brown hair sits on a yellow couch.Nicole O’Byrne, a University of New Brunswick law professor, says the Nova Scotia and New Brunswick premiers are on solid ground arguing the Chignecto Isthmus project is within federal jurisdiction because the infrastructure links two provinces and, by extension, the country. (Mag Hood/Submitted by Nicole O'Byrne)

Houston complained Tuesday that the provinces shouldn't be forced to apply under the disaster fund.

He said the project is so large that it'll crowd out other worthy mitigation and adaptation projects in Nova Scotia.

"All the other projects would be more suited, better suited, properly suited for that program — they don't have a chance to get approved," he said.

Upgrade estimate now $650 million

A report released in March 2022 presented three options, with the most expensive — raising the existing dikes and installing reinforcing steel sheet pile walls in some locations — estimated at $300 million.

Earlier this year the estimate was increased to $400 million. Ottawa agreed to contribute $200 million, or half the total, under a federal disaster mitigation program.

But now the Higgs government is putting the total figure at $650 million.

 Megan Mitton smiles in the legislature.Memramcook-Tantramar Green MLA Megan Mitton, whose riding includes the New Brunswick part of the isthmus, says work could have started by now if not for the federal-provincial feuding. (Jacques Poitras/CBC News)

Spokesperson Bruce Macfarlane said the new figure comes from a joint analysis by the two provinces along with a private engineering firm. He said the $650 million figure includes a contingency for cost overruns.

University of New Brunswick law professor Nicole O'Byrne says the two premiers are on solid ground arguing the project is within federal jurisdiction because the infrastructure links two provinces and, by extension, the country.

"The courts would likely find that is sufficient evidence to place the Chignecto Isthmus project under the jurisdictional authority of the federal government," she said.

But she said that doesn't necessarily mean Ottawa would be forced to pay the entire cost.

"Courts generally do not rule on the funding formula that should be used to fund cost-sharing projects," she said.

"This is not a legal determination. It is a political expression of co-operation by provincial and federal governments in the public interest."

Feud 'wasting the precious time,' says N.B. MLA

Memramcook-Tantramar Green MLA Megan Mitton, whose riding includes the New Brunswick part of the isthmus, says work could have started by now if not for the federal-provincial feuding.

"It has become something where they are trying to score political points, and it's really frustrating," she said. 

Mitton said the town of Sackville and other low-lying areas around the isthmus are one extreme storm away from disastrous flooding. 

"We're really facing a major risk and I'm terrified that this bickering is going to waste the time that we need.... They're wasting the precious time that we need to protect my community."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jacques Poitras

Provincial Affairs reporter

Jacques Poitras has been CBC's provincial affairs reporter in New Brunswick since 2000. He grew up in Moncton and covered Parliament in Ottawa for the New Brunswick Telegraph-Journal. He has reported on every New Brunswick election since 1995 and won awards from the Radio Television Digital News Association, the National Newspaper Awards and Amnesty International. He is also the author of five non-fiction books about New Brunswick politics and history.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 

179 Comments

 

David Amos
 
Methinks Leblanc, Houston and Higgs forgot that I was born and raised in this area N'esy Pas? 
 
 
 
 
Jos Allaire 
Reply to lee troop 
 [University of New Brunswick law professor Nicole O'Byrne says the two premiers are on solid ground arguing the project is within federal jurisdiction because the infrastructure links two provinces and, by extension, the country.

"The courts would likely find that is sufficient evidence to place the Chignecto Isthmus project under the jurisdictional authority of the federal government," she said.

But she said that doesn't necessarily mean Ottawa would be forced to pay the entire cost.

"This is not a legal determination. It is a political expression of co-operation by provincial and federal governments in the public interest."]

- To the one that stated that it's the federal's responsability and quoted the professor as a backup, as opposed to what he stated, she is stating very clearly that "that doesn't necessarily mean Ottawa would be forced to pay the entire cost" .

MLA Mitton nailed it when she stated: - ""It has become something where they are trying to score political points, and it's really frustrating...,"

"We're really facing a major risk and I'm terrified that this bickering is going to waste the time that we need.... They're wasting the precious time that we need to protect my community."

 
David Amos
Reply to Jos Allaire 
Methinks the lawyer and my cousin should study asymmetric federalism in Canada N'esy Pas?
 
 
Jos Allaire 
Reply toDavid Amos
You got it David! 
 
 
 
 
 
lee troop 
houston and higgs sounds like a comedy team 
 
 
David Amos
   
Reply to lee troop
The best team in the local circus  
 
 
Jos Allaire 
Reply to lee troop 
And it's droll, but not in the sense of funny. 
 
 
David Amos

Reply to Jos Allaire  
C'est Vrai
   
 
 
 
Daniel Rawlins
I'm pretty sure the federal government would hardly notice if Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland and Labrador should suddenly become detached from the rest of their country. Quick, anyone, how many provinces in Canada do you have to pay an extra fee just to travel to and from?
 
 
John Smith
Reply to Daniel Rawlins
To go to PEI or Newfoundland you have to pay a toll. If the Premiers expect the feds to cover 100% of the costs, soon you will have to pay a toll to go to NS too. 

 
 
 
Heather Cruickshanks
Reply to Daniel Rawlins
I agree. Our votes do not make a difference. It’s decided by Quebec and Ontario
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Daniel Rawlins
In BC most folks have to pay the ferryman in order to attend their own legislative properties
 
 
 
 
Christine Martinez  
Trudeau spends this kind of money on a weekend jaunts to Ukraine or Latvia. Not sure why he's so opposed to spending money on infrastructure in his own country.  
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Christine Martinez   
Perhaps because the provinces aren't Quebec and/or Ontario, and they have to deal with two Conservative premiers? Otherwise this would be pocket change to him. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey 
Oh So True 
 
 
 

Dan Wilkinson 
Let me guess: MLA Megan Mitton is an opposition critic. Nuff said, I will place my confidence with the law professor when it comes to points on constitutional law.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Dan Wilkinson
FYI Mitton is my cousin and the law professor ran for the Green Party in the last election. Trust that I have no confidence in either of them

Fredericton Greens back in the fight for progressive voters

Nicole O'Byrne will try to win riding back after former Green MP Jenica Atwin defected to Liberals

Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Jul 26, 2021 3:17 PM ADT

 
 
 
 
Stephen Robertson
The annual loss to the Federal treasury due to the decision of THIS Federal government to not toll and assume the maintenance cost of the Pont Champlain in Montreal is estimated at $134 million a year. If the cost of securing the isthmus for the next 100 years ballooned to 800 million, it would be equivalent to less than the investment in that bridge for about 6 years. Interesting how you can drive no charge across a city, but to get to PEI costs over 40 bucks, NFLD over 140. The Premiers say they don't have the cash, which generally means creative financing. Keep your eyes out for a big PPP deal, and of course tolls. I thought I had a bit of understanding of asymmetrical federalism, but...
 
David Amos 
Reply to Stephen Robertson
The most prominent example of asymmetric federalism in Canada is the constitutional requirement that three Supreme Court justices must come from Quebec. 
 
 
Rosco holt

Reply to Stephen Robertson 
 
 
Ronald Miller  
Reply to Rosco holt
Is is totally on them, did you read the article? 


Stephen Robertson 
Reply to Stephen Robertson
In attempting to reply to a comment which was completely legitimate and well said I hit the report button by accident. I didn't and don't know how to undo this and now the content of the poster has been deactivated. I apologize most sincerely for my part on this error! 


Stephen Robertson 
Reply to Ronald Miller  
Yes and yes
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Stephen Robertson
I am impressed with your Integrity and no doubt Mr Holt is as well 
 



Michael Cain
Instead of giving all that surplus money to the bank, Higgs could have loaned Nova Scotia their share, contracted the project, and made money. With the other half being committed by the feds, it would have been done; the feds would ultimately cover any cost overruns. I would like to see the list of all those climate change mitigation projects Huston talks about, and Higgs can show his accomplishments in spending that $65 million he committed.
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Michael Cain
Such a shame huh, applying a surplus to pay down our provincial debt? No loyal Liberal would ever allow that to happen.

Instead we could have spent much of it and somehow made money doing it? Good one!
 
 
Denny O'Brien
Reply to Michael Cain
New brunswick is the porrest province in canada
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to Don Corey
Yeah, we all know where that came from too. Interest on loans could be an ongoing payment to the debt. Economics 101.
 
 
Michael Cain.
Reply to Denny O'Brien
Since 2019, thanks to the Higgs government.
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Michael Cain
Yep, from the feds; just like all the other provinces receiving transfer payments. There is a formula to determine the amounts, so it's not "free money from Trudeau".

Too bad you failed Economics 101; I aced it!
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Michael Cain
False statement.
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to Don Corey
True statement; no made-up stories from me.
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Michael Cain
Yeah, sure.
 
 
Denny O'Brien
Reply to Don Corey
Infact that formula was created by harper,kenny and the gang
 
 
Jos Allaire.
Reply to Don Corey
You aced your own remark? How about we ask an impartial arbitrator?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jos Allaire
He aced it  
 
 
Jos Allaire.
Reply to David Amos
No he did not! 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jos Allaire
Are you claiming that I am not an impartial arbitrator? 
 
 



Don Corey
Rest assured that the federal government would have agreed to cover the entire cost had this project involved Ontario and Quebec. Dom continues his record of doing nothing for the Maritimes, who have been on a downhill slope ever since Confederation.

But no problem for $30 billion total in tax credits for two foreign-owned companies to set up battery plants in Ontario.
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to Don Corey
Federal spending between 2007 to 2019 in Atlantic Canada equaled $390.7 billion compared to revenue of $209.3 billion, a net inflow $181.4 billion of federal money. Maybe ask Higgs what he has done with our share.
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Michael Cain
Why don't you tell us where it went? You pretend to have all the answers.

And what has Dom really done for NB and the Maritimes?
 
 
Archie MacDaniel
Reply to Michael Cain
He has been spending it, ask the AG if you are that concerned.
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to Archie MacDaniel
On what?
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey
Amen
 
 


Bob Smith  
Houston and Higgs want the feds to pay the entire cost of this upgrade. That'll never happen... 
 
 
David Amos 
Reply to Bob Smith 
He with the gold makes the rules 
 
 

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Trending Articles