Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Fired cabinet minister speaks out on premier's leadership style

$
0
0

 

 

Dissenting minister who survived New Brunswick cabinet firings puzzles scholar

Daniel Allain and Jeff Carr were fired for publicly opposing government policy but not Arlene Dunn

"The convention of cabinet solidarity was broken by all three," said Emmett Macfarlane, a political scientist at the University of Waterloo.

"Arguably the premier has misunderstood the convention."

On Tuesday, Higgs shuffled his cabinet and removed former local government minister Daniel Allain and former transportation minister Jeff Carr.

Man in blue suit stepping out of black car Premier Higgs arrived at Government House for a cabinet shuffle Tuesday. He invoked the parliamentary convention of cabinet solidarity to explain why he fired two ministers, although academics say it was unevenly applied. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

Two weeks earlier the pair, along with then social development minister Dorothy Shephard and then post secondary education minister Trevor Holder and two additional backbench government MLA, voted for an opposition motion to further study government changes to Policy 713, which covers the treatment of LGBTQ students in public schools.

Shephard submitted her resignation from cabinet on June 15 following the vote, as did Holder days later.

A fifth government minister, Arlene Dunn, was not in the legislature for the vote but publicly announced the following day she, too, would have sided against the government had she been there. 

On Tuesday, while Allain and Carr were fired, Dunn retained her job and was given additional responsibilities.

Higgs explained that although Dunn had publicly opposed the government's plan in interviews and public statements, that wasn't the same violation of cabinet solidarity committed by those ministers who voted against it.

"When you have cabinet ministers who take a position against the government in the legislature, it's very significant," said Higgs.

A man wearing a suit and tie. There is another man out-of-focus behind him.  Jeff Carr said ministers felt they were free to vote their conscience on government changes to Policy 713. (Jacques Poitras/CBC)

"If you look at the parliamentary system we operate under, cabinet support is paramount."

But Macfarlane said that is not a full understanding of the principles and traditions involved.

"The convention does not apply to voting. It applies to any public disagreement with the government," said Macfarlane.

He explained that in a parliamentary system the premier and cabinet ministers are "collectively" responsible for government policies and decisions and are required to defend all of them, even those they might disagree with privately, or resign.

Dunn, he argues, was in the same position opposing the government's changes to the 713 policy outside the legislature as Carr and Allain were voting against it inside the Legislature. 

"You have a real problem when a cabinet minister even just articulates dissent," said Macfarlane.

"Under our traditional view of the convention of cabinet solidarity the minister should have actually resigned."

No 'hard' rules

Greg Flynn, chair of the department of political science at McMaster University in Hamilton, said Higgs can do as he pleases because parliamentary traditions are not "hard and fast rules" and can be applied or not at the premier's discretion.

However, he said it is difficult to argue any parliamentary tradition would suggest treating Dunn differently than Allain and Carr.

"Generally speaking, any deviation or expression of disapproval from a government's position/policy should trigger either a resignation by the Minister or dismissal from Cabinet," wrote Flynn in an email about the issue.

Yan Campagnolo, a law professor at the University of Ottawa, does see some room for Higgs to treat Dunn's opposition to the government policy differently than the other ministers, but said all three were on thin ice.

"In a system of cabinet government, a minister who cannot publicly support a significant government policy would normally be expected to resign," said Campagnolo.

A man wearing a suit jacket standing outside with his arms crossed University of Ottawa law professor Yan Campagnolo says ministers who cannot support a government policy normally resign on principle. (University of Ottawa)

In his view, a minister voting against the government in the legislature is "the ultimate form of dissent" that no premier would tolerate, but he said it's not clear to him if Dunn's absence from the vote was a scheduling problem or a deliberate decision not to embarrass Higgs.

"Arlene Dunn's case is not as clear cut," he said.

Higgs had publicly announced prior to the vote in the legislature that he would not be requiring government MLAs to support any particular position and on Wednesday Carr said that signaled to ministers they were free to vote their conscience.

"It's not a whipped vote and nobody asked us how we were going to vote," Carr told CBC News.

But Macfarlane said that's not how cabinet solidarity works, either.

He said free votes for cabinet ministers are rare and always explicit, and he said every minister who feels it important to be publicly critical of a government policy or to vote against it, normally would resign their cabinet position on their own beforehand.

"We would always, except for very rare exceptions in Canadian history, expect cabinet members to vote with the government. That is in fact the convention of cabinet solidarity,"  said Macfarlane.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Robert Jones

Reporter

Robert Jones has been a reporter and producer with CBC New Brunswick since 1990. His investigative reports on petroleum pricing in New Brunswick won several regional and national awards and led to the adoption of price regulation in 2006.

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
35 Comments
 
 
 
David Amos
Oh My My
 
 
 
David Amos  

I am certain that the Fat Fred City Finest can explain why the Lady's position is secure 

 

 

 

Fired cabinet minister speaks out on premier's leadership style

Jeff Carr remains PC MLA, supports leadership review

On Tuesday, Higgs shuffled his cabinet, replacing Carr in transportation and former local government minister Daniel Allain.

The reason given was that the two former ministers broke with cabinet solidarity by voting for an opposition motion on Policy 713.

"We have to respect the parliamentary system that we're in, the sanctity of cabinet, and the fact we'll have very frank and open discussion in cabinet or in caucus, but in cabinet you have to have solidarity," said Higgs after the shuffle. 

A man in suit and tie and wearing glasses speaks. Higgs claimed the vote on Policy 713 was not whipped, but he said Tuesday, 'I never made it a free vote, either.' (Stephen MacGillivray/The Canadian Press)

But Carr isn't buying that explanation.

"Cabinet solidarity, yeah, you can't square that up when it's an opposition motion," said Carr, speaking to Information Morning Fredericton. 

"It's not a whipped vote and nobody asked us how we were going to vote. Nobody talked to us about that after we voted for, like, 18 days."

Cabinet conflict

Cabinet solidarity is the concept that cabinet ministers must openly support the government on all matters, and if a minister can't or won't support the government they should resign.

But this clashes with the idea of a free vote, meaning government members are not whipped — expected to vote on the government side, which sometimes happens with votes on issues such as abortion or LGBTQ rights.

There are different interpretations on whether cabinet ministers can vote against the government on a free vote, like Carr did, or must simply abstain, as Arlene Dunn did on the same Policy 713 vote. She remains in cabinet.

Dark-haired man with beard and glasses standing in front of a white house. Political scientists J.P. Lewis said it's up to the premier to interpret when a minister has violated the sanctity of the cabinet. (Graham Thompson/CBC)

J.P. Lewis, a political scientist at UNB Saint John, said cabinet ministers have been expected to support the government even on free votes, historically, but the interpretation of that rule comes down to the premier.

"It's the premier's prerogative," said Lewis. "It's up to the first minister to interpret when they think a minister has violated [cabinet solidarity.]"

Premier 'lost' says Carr

Carr said he questions whether he should have stayed in cabinet as long as he did, but said he was hoping to have a moderating effect on the premier.

He said there have been ongoing issues with Higgs's leadership style, adding the premier's behaviour at a weekend PC party meeting was indicative of his style behind the scenes.

"People were offering the premier an olive branch to ask him to fix this within caucus," said Carr. "He burned that olive branch in front of a number of very good volunteers."

Premier Blaine Higgs rewards MLAs for their loyalty, and dumps two Ministers who veered from that path​. Jeanne Armstrong spoke to one of them, Jeff Carr, MLA for New Maryland-Sunbury​.

Carr also had criticism for the people running that meeting, saying it was unorganized and the agenda was changed without advance warning.

"It was like it was purposely unofficial so that there would be no record of what would happen on Saturday," said Carr.

CBC News has reached out to PC party president Erika Hachey about Carr's description of the meeting and is awaiting a response.

Carr remains PC MLA

He dodged questions about whether he still supports Higgs, but said he doesn't support his leadership style.

He does support a leadership review.

"The premier seems to have lost his way with this style," said Carr. 

"I feel for him and his family and my colleagues, and we have to do something soon."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Jordan Gill

Reporter

Jordan Gill is a CBC reporter based out of Fredericton. He can be reached at jordan.gill@cbc.ca.

With files from Information Morning Fredericton

 
 
 
144 Comments
 
 
 
David Amos
Who do you believe?  
  
 
 
David Amos
Deja Vu?

Several high-profile ministers dropped as Blaine Higgs unveils new cabinet

Premier appoints 6 women to 16-member cabinet in Tuesday's swearing-in ceremony

Jacques Poitras · CBC News · Posted: Sep 29, 2020 2:40 PM ADT

Premier Blaine Higgs has jettisoned six members of his previous cabinet and has appointed six women as ministers in a sweeping post-election shuffle.

The six Progressive Conservative MLAs who served in Higgs's cabinet from 2018 until they were dropped Tuesday include high-profile members Andrea Anderson-Mason, who was attorney general, Jeff Carr who was at Environment and Local Government, and Jake Stewart who was minister of Aboriginal affairs.

Bill Oliver, Sherry Wilson and Ross Wetmore are also out. 

 
David Amos
Reply to David Amos  
 "Higgs told reporters that dropping six ministers was "nothing personal," and he said his new lineup is what he has "right now," holding out the possibility that reorganizing departments in the coming years could let some MLAs return to cabinet.

"We will look going forward at what needs to change," he said.

In other cabinet moves, Bruce Fitch replaces Shephard as minister of social development, while Education and Early Childhood Development Minister Dominic Cardy remains in that job. Mary Wilson moves from Economic Development to minister of Service New Brunswick.

Rookie Moncton East MLA Daniel Allain becomes the minister of local government and local government reform.

Allain told reporters the title is a sign that the government considers reform a major priority.

Other first-time MLAs joining cabinet are:

Margaret Johnson as minister of agriculture, aquaculture and fisheries.

Arlene Dunn as minister responsible for economic development. She is also minister responsible for immigration and minister of Aboriginal affairs.

Tammy Scott-Wallace as minister of tourism, heritage and culture and minister responsible for women's equality.

Jill Green as minister of transportation and infrastructure." 

 

 

 
Vivian Unger 
"It's up to the premier to interpret when a minister has violated the sanctity of the cabinet." Sounds like a dictatorship. The overwhelming power invested in party leaders is a clear and present threat to Canadian "democracy." 


David Amos
Reply to Vivian Unger 
Well put
 
 
 
 
Pete Spence 

"The sanctity of cabinet."

Whoa !! What drugs is this dude on !!

sanctity (noun) : the state or quality of being holy, sacred, or saintly.

 
David Amos

Reply to Pete Spence  
Welcome to the circus  
 
 
 
 
 
Bill Green  
Another day, another controversy for Blaine Higgs. His time is running short for office. He is clearly trying to go scorched earth, but by the by, his party is dwindling. Polling shows that Susan Holt will be premier by the next election at this rate
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Green  
I maintain that Daniel Allain will be the next Premier 
 
 
Vivian Unger
Reply to Bill Green  
Hard to predict, when we don't even know yet if Higgs will be dropped. 
 
 
 
 
  
Bobby Richards
Higgs is playing with the junior varsity single A team at a triple A tournament. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply toBobby Richards
You could not pay me to watch a hockey game but I would spend my last dimes on peanuts and popcorn as I spend all my time watching Higgy's circus 
 
 
 
 
 
Don Corey 
It was an opposition motion, but Carr has been around long enough to know that voting for it (rightly or wrongly) meant voting against the very government with which he enjoyed cabinet status. He knows why he's out.....bye Jeffy....should have pulled an Arlene Dunn.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply toDon Corey
Go Figure

Dissenting minister who survived New Brunswick cabinet firings puzzles scholar

Daniel Allain and Jeff Carr were fired for publicly opposing government policy but not Arlene Dunn

Robert Jones · CBC News · Posted: Jun 29, 2023 7:00 AM ADT 

 
David Amos
Reply toDon Corey  
"Greg Flynn, chair of the department of political science at McMaster University in Hamilton, said Higgs can do as he pleases because parliamentary traditions are not "hard and fast rules" and can be applied or not at the premier's discretion.

However, he said it is difficult to argue any parliamentary tradition would suggest treating Dunn differently than Allain and Carr." 

 
Don Corey
Reply to David Amos  
I'm sure Higgs will be explaining his rationale behind the Dunn exclusion.  
 
 
Ed Armstrong
Reply toDon Corey 
As the 3rd Carr Brother from the New Maryland area to serve in Cabinet, Jeff knew very well his actions could get him removed from Cabinet or should have. As the old saying goes, "Don't bite the hand that feeds you", you must play by the rules. As for Arlene Dunn, The Premier must figure she is more valuable inside Cabinet than sitting outside throwing the snowballs the others make.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Ed Armstrong
The plot thickens
 
 



-Thomas Grant 
Thumbs up for Higgs 


David Amos
Reply to -Thomas Grant  
Only one?  
 
 
 
 
Steve Ryan  
It's called purging, cleansing. Needs to be done at all levels.
 
 
Jim Lake 
Reply to Steve Ryan 
Starting with the Premier’s office.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jim Lake 
Amen 




Jim Lake 
Very telling indeed …

Highlights the massive dysfunction that Higgs has created in our government and in our province.

And it highlights how urgently our province needs a change … only then will we have the chance to be better.

 
Don Corey
Reply to Jim Lake 
What's so "telling" about it? Carr should have known better.

Look no further than Ottawa for recent real life examples on what happens when a cabinet minister tries to buck the boss.

 
David Amos

Reply toDon Corey
I am certain that the Fat Fred City Finest can explain why Madame Dunn's position is secure 
 
 
David Amos
Reply toDon Corey 
True 
 
 
Bobby Richards
Reply toDon Corey 
Carr did know what was going to happen. Anyone that works with Higgs knows what the outcome would be. Carr and others had the guts to get out from under the premier's thumb and let the public see what this govt is actually like. When Higg's was in private business he would terminate employees and never see them again. He can't do that here and it's driving him mad. He can't fire them from their MLA position. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply toBobby Richards
Years ago Higgy called me crazy Now its my turn to call him that  
 
 
Don Corey
Reply toBobby Richards
True, but he could kick them out of the party. That would pretty much kill any chance they might have had otherwise to be re-elected.  
 
 
Bobby Richards
Reply toDon Corey
And put the PCs into a minority govt. Then we know what happens after that.  
 
 
Don Corey
Reply toBobby Richards 
I said he "could", but it would not be a wise move (especially for him). 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Monty Shplar  
These fired CM's are Liberals in blue shirts, clean house and show them the door !  
 
 
G. Timothy Walton
Reply to Monty Shplar 
There wasn't a huge difference between the two parties until Higgs stopped hiding his true colours.

 
Monty Shplar
Reply to G. Timothy Walton  
You mean his true blue colors.
 
 
David Amos
 
Reply to Monty Shplar 
Dream on  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to G. Timothy Walton  
Yea Right  
 
 
Bobby Richards
Reply to Monty Shplar
More like moderates I would say. That's where I am as a PC supporter. Higg's has now created a far right. Far rights and far lefts will always vote conservative or liberal every time but it's the ones in the middle that decide the winner of an election. It will be interesting to see where NB stands come election time.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply toBobby Richards
We always get the governments we deserve  
 
 
Bobby Richards
Reply to David Amos
I agree.
 
 
 
 
tessie Quinn 
What a way to end the school year. For teachers, parents and students. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply totessie Quinn  
Yup




Marcel Belanger
It seems Higgs has said there will be a caucus meeting fairly soon where they will vote on whether or not the six rebels can stay in caucus. I think this will be a most interesting meeting since those 6 will be able to attend.  
 
 
Jim Lake 
Reply to Marcel Belanger 
It would be tremendous to see the 6 leave of their own accord to sit as independents - see them take control rather than wait for Higgs to give them the toe of his boot.  
 
 
Don Corey 
Reply to Jim Lake 
You can only wish lol....  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Marcel Belanger
Methinks they would be able to sit as Independents yet remain card carrying PC Party members just like Cardy is N'esy Pas? 
 
 
Marcel Belanger 
Reply to David Amos  
You are correct in that statement, they can remain at least until the next election where Higgs won’t sign their nomination papers. When they become independent as is highly likely then Higgs will trigger an election. 


David Amos
Reply to Marcel Belanger  
How do you that Higgy will still be their leader by then?

Marcel Belanger 
Reply to David Amos   
How do you know he did not engineer this whole affair to create a polarizing issue with himself as the higher moral politician. There's a group on FB who's looking for people to sign up and support Higgs based on this single issue. His numbers are in the basement so what was he going to do to galvanize support. Well....we're seeing what he's going to do. The PC party is about to gut itself and all in public view, he needs a hot issue to get thru this.


David Amos
Reply to Marcel Belanger 
I think he did engineer it 
 
 
 

Le Wier
If I could pick a song to sum up today in New Brunswick politics I would pick Hush Joy Williams.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Le Wier
How about "Stuck in the Middle With You"  
 
 
 
 
Buford Wilson  
Jeff needs to go away. 
 
 
David Amos

Reply to Buford Wilson
But he has no car  
 
 
David Amos

Reply to Buford Wilson 
I should say he is a Carr but he has no free car to get away with Correct? 
 
 
Sterling Wright
Reply to Buford Wilson 
Maybe he and Blaine could go together  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Sterling Wright
At least Blaine still has a free car and chauffeur to boot. Ya think he would take his old buddy with him when its time to get out of Dodge 
 
 
 
 
Samual Johnston 
Seems like a pretty good reason to kick someone out to me. Would JT or any other leader keep these people around? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Samual Johnston
Ask Jody (Not one of the Carr dudes)  
 
 
Christine Martinez 
Reply to Samual Johnston
Yep. Show me an MP in JT's cabinet that breaks solidarity in a vote, and I'll show you a soon-to-be independent MP.  
 
 
Don Corey 
Reply to Samual Johnston
We all know what JT's response is.  
 
 
Don Corey    
Reply to Christine Martinez
Very quickly, and with extreme prejudice.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Don Corey 
My responses to their actions can be described in the same fashion 


Don Corey    
Reply to David Amos
And for good reason 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Le Wier
Why would Higgs put Mary Wilson in his inner circle when she is a sister by choice with the Carr Brothers, and they are the ones that voted for the leadership review? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Le Wier
Because Mary is so very  
 
 
 
 
Greg Miller  
Unfortunately virtually all politicians have personal agendas not usually directed at the "public good". Being a politician is almost an addiction.
 
 
Matt Plastic
Reply to Greg Miller
Agreed. Name a single politician who did it for the betterment of the people. Higgs did it for the betterment of "his people" and we all know who they are. Hint they all make over 6 figures. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Greg Miller  
Its worse than an addiction 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Matt Plastic  
Jim Traficant 
 
 
Samual Johnston 
Reply to Matt Plastic  
Dunno about that. His work on the economy keeping the deficits down, reducing the debt and so on. All these things are for the common person. 
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to Greg Miller
Not a job for just anyone.
 
 
Matt Plastic  
Reply to Samual Johnston 
Deficit and debt are numbers on paper. There's still high taxes in NB and very little services to show for it. The economy is also not exactly booming as you can see. Shy of moncton it's the status quo everywhere else. Which is just how Blaine likes it. He knows the folks who don't like change will keep voting for him.
 
 
Don Corey
Reply to Matt Plastic 
Actually they're very real, just like spending in excess of what you earn and then borrowing more from the bank. A billion in debt reduction means exactly that, and a corresponding reduction in real money that it takes just for the debt interest. Obviously economics has never been your strength. 
 
 
Al Clark
Reply to Michael Cain
check your conscience at the door
 
 
David Amos
 
Reply to Al Clark 
Do you have one? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Al Clark
Hmmm
 
 
Michael Cain
Reply to Matt Plastic 
Visit Fredericton; the amount of construction going on for the past couple of years is really high. Still lots of money floating around. Higgs has nothing to do with it. 
 
 
Al Clark  
Reply to David Amos
Mmmmm 
 
 
Matt Plastic
Reply to Don Corey
What the government owes or doesn't owe doesn't concern me. Debt comes and goes, it's money on paper moving back and forth all while services stay the same. You keep insulting anonymous people on internet forums and I'll live in the real world. 
 
 
Matt Plastic
Reply to Don Corey
I don't think economics is your strength or you wouldn't be wasting your time posting here. Government debt is the least of my concern. There will always be debt. I live in the now. 
 
 


Le Wier  
I think Higgs should be concerned. Carr called Mary Wilson his sister by choice, and Mary said she swore allegiance to Higgs. But did she really?  
 
 
Jos Allaire
Reply to Le Wier
She swore at him she meant.   

 
Michael Cain 
Reply to Le Wier   
She needs that pension badly. 
 

David Amos

Reply to Jos Allaire  
When I met Mary she didn't dare swear at me
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jos Allaire  
Oh My My


 
 
Kyle Woodman  
The real problem with team Higgs is they have a really poor understanding of how governance and legislative processes work in NB. The deputy speaker blunder is another example of how the just don't get the basics of our democratic system.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Kyle Woodman
They don't care   
 
 
Kyle Woodman 
Reply to David Amos 
Probably
 
 
 
 
Benny Swim  
Higgs' problems are a plot by well known Liberal party operatives like the Carr brothers and Trevor Holder. 
 
 
Graham McCormack 
Reply to Benny Swim
Yes, they are well know liberals. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Benny Swim 
Now thats funny  
 
 
 
 
JOhn D Bond  
Sorry Jeff Carr but as in Federal Politics, you serve at the pleasure of the Premier.

It has nothing to do with voting with or against the government. It simply requires that the premier retains confidence in you and is 100% subjective.

 
Jos Allaire
Reply to JOhn D Bond
The problem is, Higgs casting out his best and they are few and far between.

The writing is on the wall for Higgs.

 
JOhn D Bond 
Reply to Jos Allaire 
It may very well be the case. Not the issue of the article.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jos Allaire
Please explain "best" 
 
 
Jos Allaire
Reply to David Amos
The bar is low, very low! 
 
 
Fred Brewer  
Reply to JOhn D Bond
And the Premier serves at the pleasure of his party who want him out. And he serves at the pleasure of the voters who I think also want him out. 
 
 
 
 
 
William Peters  
Who, may I ask, dreamed up this historical convention or "principle". It is no different than to say: My dear, we have always had our oatmeal this way. How dare you question it! Who was the first authoritarian premier who demanded to be supported or else? Did this come from England? What the political scientist does tell us is that a premier could just as easily think differently. So there you go, we can focus on electing someone who will answer that question about his preference before we vote for him. Remember the question. The desire to have people comply might be found in all parties if we don't select against it. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to William Peters  
Methinks its the same dudes who dreamed up the notwithstanding clause or parliamentary privilege or longstanding tradition etc N'esy Pas? 


Kyle Woodman 
Reply to William Peters 
Conservatives historically were the party that tried to preserve these legislative conventions and principles in our Westminster system.  
 
 
 
 
Shawn Tabor  
This article speaks volumes,,, if everything or if their words are true. If they can’t vote the way they want, then why even show up. Holy smokes, this is what people want to hear. Read the story again. He got fired because he did not vote the way the rest of them wanted him to. WOW. You now know why the province is so screwed up. Like Irving, believe me, this is Irving. Wow again. Great day, the proof is right here. Speaks volumes and volumes of what your so called Government truly is. Like Irving, either you do it or they will find someone that will. Thank you. Again i am so excited to read this article. This is real proof. Nothing will come out of it, but at least it was spoken. Finally. Boy oh boy, does this brings back memories of baby boomer bosses. Funny they change when you challenge them. Thank you again. A lot of people in Little NB that have back bones the same as a jelly fish. Too funny. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Shawn Tabor  
Why do you think I always ran as an Independent?


G. Timothy Walton 
Reply to David Amos
Do you really want that question answered?  
 
 
David Amos

Reply to G. Timothy Walton  
I asked my former friend not you  
 
 
Shawn Tabor 
Reply to David Amos
Remember the roads we traveled, what i learned or what we both learned. The Judges, the Police and especially the Lawyers have showed that law does not exist. Its all about protecting each other and the almighty GAME. ( money ). Democracy has to be a myth. Think of the families that live in somewhat fear of this or have grave doubts of their elected officials or the government in general. This topic and many many more. If you speak out against Irving your fired, everyone knows this. That clown still has to be working for Irving not the public, sigmen Foid maybe, sorry about my spelling, reminds me of a Lawyer LOL. Think of the people that will never speak for fear living in New Brunswick and what has happened to folks that do. Forget about going to court, calling the police. They are nervous just to investigate certain things. Truly a wow moment and thank you Mr Carr. I hope their is thousands of comments on this. The cat is out of the bag. WOW 
 

David Amos 
Reply to G. Timothy Walton 
Satisfied now?  
 
 
 
 
 
Dacre Gushue  
A demoted disgruntled employee with the publics ear (thanks CBC). The same thing happened with Andrea Anderson Mason. Actions have consequences. These are smart people, it shouldn't have to be explained. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Dacre Gushue 
Why don't you try to explain? 
 
 
 
 
Dacre Gushue  
Nice on JP to pass off a hit piece. He was looking at tad bias.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Dacre Gushue
and you are not?
 
 
 
 
 
Ronald Miller  
Whatever happens with the PCs, they need to get their act together for the sake of NB. We know the destruction that would happen with another option getting power. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Ronald Miller 
So you say 
 
 
Matt Plastic 
Reply to Ronald Miller 
Who cares if the Liberals spend more money. At least we will have nice things. Or is not about money with you and more about "traditional values" ? 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Le Wier
Perhaps Carr’s firing had to do not only with his insubordination, but with his performance as minister. As Carr said in the Information Morning Fredericton interview “it’s Premier’s choice.” on who sits in his cabinet. On another note what an odd statement “I feel for his family.” What happened to the Premier’s family?
 
 
William Peters 
Reply to Le Wier
What? The premier sacked him and Allain for a reason he gave publicly.  
 
 
Le Wier
Reply to William Peters
 
 
David Amos
Reply to William Peters
Yea Right 
 
 
 
 
Howard O'Toole 
Higgs seems to lack the temperament to be an effective leader for all New Brunswickers.
 
  
Dacre Gushue
Reply to Howard O'Toole   
This kind of insubordination would get you fired from any high profile job.  
 
 
Howard O'Toole 
Reply to Dacre Gushue
I wouldn't use the term "insubordination ", MLA's are elected to represent ridings in various parts of the province. As such there should be room for different points of view and it shouldn't be just whatever the Premier wants.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Howard O'Toole 
Most New Brunswickers thought that out of the gate  
 
 
 
 
B.W. Fishman  

........................and worse, PP is still slithering around N.B.

Get PP an N.B. t-shift.........................It should read, "The New Backwards"

 
David Amos
Reply to B.W. Fishman  
At least he is spending money here That should help our economy EH?
 
 
 
 
Toby Tolly 
the last liberal premier hid a 130mil secret

that's the liberal style

now I will read the story

 
Graham McCormack 
Reply to Toby Tolly 
Move on, that was a long time ago and it has been dealt with. 
 
 
William Peters 
Reply to Toby Tolly  
He was forced to leave just like this guy will be. On to the next! Grifters are not wanted and neither are corporate kleptocrats or authoritarians. But thanks for reminding us that no party is safe.
 
 
Toby Tolly 
Reply to Graham McCormack 
my motto

je me souviens

 
Dacre Gushue 
Reply to Graham McCormack 
Yes move on Toby! Nothing to see there...

Do as they say, not as they do.

 
David Amos
Reply to Toby Tolly 
My Clan's Motto is Veritas Vincit 


Mathieu Laperriere 
Reply to Toby Tolly  
If it wasn't a french thing you wouldn't have cared. 

 
 
 
Bob Smith  
So Higgs is equating a vote on Policy 713 with a vote on budgetary measures or a non confidence motion. That's a strange equivalence...
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bob Smith 
Welcome back to the circus 
 
 
 
 
Andrew Martin  
"employee fired gives opinion because they're upset" 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Andrew Martin 
So? 


Andrew Martin 
Reply to David Amos 
Yes?
 
 
 
 
Matt Plastic  
Higgs doesn't have the best interests of NB at heart. He seems to like being in charge more than helping the common folks 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Matt Plastic 
He does love being the boss
 
 

 
 

As New Brunswick changes its LGBTQ policy in schools, advocates worry it's just the beginning

'There's nothing stopping a government from passing discriminatory legislation,' says professor

A policy about LGBTQ students at the heart of a political battle in New Brunswick could have a ripple effect across Canada, according to experts who say they're concerned it could open the door for other provincial governments to make similar changes.

New Brunswick's Policy 713, which was introduced in August 2020, outlines minimum requirements for a safe environment for LGBTQ students. Earlier in June, the province's Progressive Conservative government made changes to the policy, scheduled to take effect on July 1.

If those changes go forward, similar "attacks against the transgender and the non-binary community" could happen elsewhere in Canada, said Kristopher Wells, an associate professor at MacEwan University in Edmonton, and the Canada Research Chair for the Public Understanding of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth.

"Once one government makes a change, then it becomes often easier or more popular for other governments to consider those changes as well," he told CBC News.

"I think other provinces are obviously watching very closely to see what the potential fallout will be," said Helen Kennedy, the executive director for LGBTQ advocacy group Egale Canada.

New Brunswick's recent changes to the policy mean it's no longer mandatory for teachers to use the preferred pronouns or names of transgender or non-binary students under the age of 16.

A teacher or school would need to obtain parental consent for any child who wants to change their name at school. A student who refuses parental involvement would be referred to a school psychologist or social worker to develop a plan to inform the student's parents.

Premier Blaine Higgs has said that the changes reflect the government's desire to ensure parents play a role in the "formative years" of their children.

Higgs defended the changes again Tuesday during an interview with CBC's Power and Politics, saying he was seeing "a tremendous outpouring of support" for his position.

"Nationally, people are saying, 'Why wouldn't parents play a role?'" he said.

WATCH | Trudeau weighs in on New Brunswick's Policy 713: 

‘Trans kids need to feel safe’: Prime Minister Justin Trudeau weighs in on Policy 713

Duration 0:32
Speaking at a Pride event Thursday night in Toronto, the prime minister spoke out against changes made by the Higgs government to Policy 713.

Backlash, political debate

The change has caused turmoil in Higgs' cabinet, including two resignations. On Tuesday, he dropped two ministers who had voted against him on the gender-identity policy. Unionized school psychologists and social workers have filed two grievances with the provincial government.

It has also sparked federal debate, with both Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Opposition Leader Pierre Poilievre chiming in. Speaking at a Pride even in Toronto earlier in June, Trudeau spoke out against the changes.

"Trans kids need to feel safe, not targeted by politicians. We need to stand against this," he said.

On Tuesday, Poilievre told reporters that Trudeau should stay out of it, saying "the prime minister has no business in decisions that should rest with provinces and parents." 

"So my message to Justin Trudeau is, 'Butt out and let provinces run schools and let parents raise kids.'"

WATCH | Pierre Poilievre tells Trudeau to 'butt out': 

Poilievre: PM has 'no business' in N.B. gender identity policy debate

Duration 0:28
Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre says the prime minister needs to let 'provinces run schools and parents raise children.'

The changes have drawn national attention, with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association (CCLA) saying it will cause harm to trans and non-binary kids — not just in New Brunswick, but potentially across Canada.

"Make no mistake that this decision sets a dangerous precedent and that could instigate similar attempts to harm the rights of children across the country," Harini Sivalingam, lawyer and director of the Equality Program at the CCLA, said in a June 9 press release.

Meanwhile, a conservative Christian group based in B.C. is calling it a test case for its own efforts to roll back school LGBTQ policies.

Court challenges an option that take time

LGBTQ rights in Canada are protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression are protected in every provincial and territorial Human Rights Act.

According to Wells, this means any public institution by law must provide a discrimination-free environment.

A man in a suit stands in front of a sign for MacEwan University. According to Kristopher Wells, an associate professor at MacEwan University in Edmonton, and the Canada Research Chair for the Public Understanding of Sexual and Gender Minority Youth, 'there's nothing stopping a government from passing discriminatory legislation.' (MacEwan University)

"But that doesn't mean that the rights won through the courts and through government can't be stripped away or taken away," he said. 

Wells points to what happened after Jason Kenney was elected premier in Alberta — his United Conservative Party passed a controversial education bill that rolled back previous protections for children who join Gay-Straight Alliances in schools.

While politicians can pass legislation or policies that can be seen as discriminatory, these can also be challenged in the courts, Wells said, noting that there are checks and balances in the system.

In New Brunswick, he said, the only recourse the community really has is to either file a human rights complaint or go through the court system.

"But the reality is it takes a long time to challenge a government in court to get legislation ruled as being unconstitutional and stricken down," Wells said.

"There's nothing stopping a government from passing discriminatory legislation. That's why people need to to be very careful about how they vote."

Just the beginning?

Egale Canada's Kennedy says she worries the changes to Policy 713 are just the beginning.

"Do I see a political trend here to scapegoat members of the 2SLGBTQI community? Absolutely," Kennedy said. "We forget that there are human beings attached to the other end of all these political opportunist actions."

It's a hostile environment right now for the LGBTQ community, she said, noting the recent targeting of Pride flags as just one example.

Several communities across Canada, including Norwich, Ont., and Hope, B.C., have recently decided not to fly Pride flags. There have also been reports this year of flags in various provinces being stolendamaged and burned

Earlier this month, students in Vaughan, Ont., walked out over the York Catholic District School Board's decision not to raise a Pride flag at its education centre.

As far as Policy 713 is concerned, Kennedy says other provinces are likely looking at both the political response — will an election be called? Will Higgs fall? — and the community response, such as parental pushback. And while she says it's been encouraging to see some opposition, she also says the damage has been done.

"It's out there. We all know how [Higgs] feels about members of the 2SLGBTQI communities, and it's disturbing," she said.

"Every child, every student, has a right to a safe and inclusive education."

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Natalie Stechyson

Senior writer and editor

Natalie Stechyson is a senior writer and editor at CBC News. She's worked in newsrooms across the country in her 12+ years of journalism experience, including the Globe and Mail, Postmedia News, Calgary Herald and Brunswick News. Before joining CBC News, she was the Parents editor at HuffPost Canada, where she won a silver Canadian Online Publishing Award.

With files Marie-Jose Burgos and the Canadian Press

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Trending Articles