Quantcast
Channel: David Raymond Amos Round 3
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Loan or gift? 93-year-old man says now-former RCMP officer won't repay the $100K he gave him

$
0
0
 

Loan or gift? 93-year-old man says now-former RCMP officer won't repay the $100K he gave him

In court filings, then-Mountie says money was never meant to be repaid

Charles Samms, 93, filed a statement of claim at Newfoundland and Labrador Supreme Court against his neighbour on Nov. 4, 2022 — two years to the day after writing Lush the cheque. 

Lush, meanwhile, is asking the court to dismiss the case and says he is innocent of any wrongdoing.

But the conflict between the two neighbours sparked two separate investigations into Lush's conduct — one criminal, one internal.

The criminal investigation found there was insufficient evidence to support criminal charges, the RCMP said in an emailed statement to CBC News.

The force said its professional responsibility unit then did a full internal investigation into alleged contraventions of the RCMP's code of conduct. 

The RCMP said Lush is no longer employed by the force, having resigned last month before that process concluded.

In an email to CBC News, Lush's lawyer said his client took a medical retirement unrelated to the matter involving Samms.

'I'm so upset about it'

During an interview at his Deer Lake home on Monday, Samms said the incident has taken a toll.

"I'm so upset about it," he said. "I'm awake, night after night."

Samms said he and his wife Camille first met Lush and his family when the Sammses moved next door in 2018. The elderly couple wanted to spend their waning time together in Samms's hometown after years of living in Ontario, where he worked as a truck driver.

Samms said he was immediately impressed with his neighbour's kindness after a snowstorm struck the town on Newfoundland's west coast. 

"[Lush] came over and [did] the driveway. I went out and met him. Thanked him. I said, 'How much do I owe you?' He said, 'You don't owe me anything. You're a neighbour, I just wanted to help you out,'" said Samms.

He said their friendship grew from there.

According to Samms, Lush approached him in 2020 about financial troubles, saying he was struggling to pay his mortgage and feared he would lose his house.

Samms said Lush did not ask for a loan — Samms offered one.

"I said, 'I'll help you out.' He said, 'You don't have to.' I should never have given him the $100,000," said Samms.

"I never, ever said it was a gift. Who would be crazy enough to give away $100,000 as a gift?"

'Gift ... in appreciation of his friendship and assistance'

But Lush tells a different story.

In court documents, Lush said it was Samms who approached him, "stating his firm intention to provide the defendant with a gift of $100,000 in appreciation of his friendship and assistance."

According to court filings, Lush said he initially refused to accept the money.

"But the plaintiff persisted and eventually persuaded the defendant to accept the unconditional gift," wrote Mark Mills, Lush's lawyer, in a statement of defence filed this January.

A red brick building. Const. Jason Lush worked for the RCMP at the Deer Lake detachment. (Troy Turner/CBC)

Lush alleges that Samms became upset with him the year after the money changed hands, because Lush sustained a significant injury that prevented him from helping Samms around the house. That's when, Lush alleges, Samms began asking for the money back. 

Samms told CBC News he disagrees about the intention of asking for repayment.

"I phoned him up and asked him, 'When are you going to start paying back some of the money you owe me?' [Lush] said, 'I can't afford to pay you anything,' and he hung up."

Lush's statement of defence says the money was never meant to be repaid, and the funds have been spent. 

Through his lawyer, Lush declined an interview.

However, in a statement, Mills said Lush is eager for the matter to proceed through civil court.

"Mr. Samms' statement that he is owed an unpaid debt by Mr. Lush is false and defamatory," wrote Mills in an email Wednesday.

"Beyond the filing of initial pleadings, Mr. Samms has made no attempt to advance this matter through the courts in earnest, which is indicative of the complete lack of merit his case has. Mr. Lush is a respected and upstanding member of his community and is innocent of any wrongdoing."

None of the claims from either side have been tested in court.

A man with white hair looks out a window. Samms and his wife moved to Deer Lake from Ontario in 2018. (Troy Turner/CBC)

Samms said his wife was upset with him for handing over the money and told her husband that they should have had a written agreement. 

"I said, 'We can trust him.' That's why I didn't get him to sign anything because he was such a nice guy and friendly. He's going to church all the time, I figured he'd pay me back but he didn't," said Samms, adding he trusted him even more because he was a police officer.

"I wanted to help him out, I didn't give him the bloody money."

Camille Samms died in June 2022.

Samms and Lush remain neighbours; their properties are connected by a grassy lawn.

RCMP addresses situation

In answers to questions from CBC News, the RCMP said its conflict of interest policy includes rules addressing the acceptance of gifts or loans.

"All employees are expected to uphold the highest ethical standards and must maintain public confidence in the objectivity of the RCMP by preventing and avoiding actual, apparent, or potential conflicts of interest," wrote RCMP spokesperson Cpl. Jolene Garland. 

While the RCMP said it did complete an internal investigation, a decision was not made before Lush resigned. The force did not elaborate on the findings of that investigation, and did not specify whether Lush would have been disciplined if he had not left his position.

RCMP assistant commissioner Jennifer Ebert, the force's commanding officer in Newfoundland and Labrador. Assistant Commissioner Jennifer Ebert is the commanding officer of the RCMP in Newfoundland and Labrador. (Terry Roberts/CBC)

Assistant Commissioner Jennifer Ebert — the commanding officer for the RCMP in Newfoundland and Labrador — said police officers are held to a high standard.

She stressed in a statement that the "vast majority of our employees perform their work in a manner that reflects our core values — to act with integrity, show respect, demonstrate compassion, take responsibility and serve with excellence."

Ebert noted, "RCMP employees are expected to conduct themselves in a manner that meets the highest ethical standards of our organization and the rightfully high expectations of citizens."

She added, "When those standards are not met, employees are dealt with through stringent processes in place to address the issues and to help ensure public confidence." 

In an email to CBC News, Lush's lawyer said the RCMP could have pursued internal investigation of the matter even after Lush retired but declined to do so.

A red and white logo says CBC Investigates.

Read more from CBC Newfoundland and Labrador

ABOUT THE AUTHOR


Ariana Kelland

Investigative reporter

Ariana Kelland is a reporter with the CBC Newfoundland and Labrador bureau in St. John's. She is working as a member of CBC's Atlantic Investigative Unit. Email: ariana.kelland@cbc.ca

CBC's Journalistic Standards and Practices
 
 
 
 
 
 
139 Comments
 
 
 
David Amos
An RCMP member conned an old man? Surprise Surprise Surprise
 
 
David Amos
Reply to David Amos 
"Assistant Commissioner Jennifer Ebert — the commanding officer for the RCMP in Newfoundland and Labrador — said police officers are held to a high standard.

She stressed in a statement that the "vast majority of our employees perform their work in a manner that reflects our core values — to act with integrity, show respect, demonstrate compassion, take responsibility and serve with excellence."

Ebert noted, "RCMP employees are expected to conduct themselves in a manner that meets the highest ethical standards of our organization and the rightfully high expectations of citizens."

She added, "When those standards are not met, employees are dealt with through stringent processes in place to address the issues and to help ensure public confidence."

YEA RIGHT

 
Loretta Willings
Reply to David Amos
Ok and how was Jason Lush dealt with? 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Loretta Willings
The cops obviously played dumb while waiting for the old man to die 
 
 
 
 
 
Carly Wattson  
So it comes down to a disagreement over money between two neighbours. Take it to the news? 
 
 
Maureen Brannigan 
Reply to Carly Wattson  
Are you sure you're not related to Lush? 
 
 
Carly Wattson
Reply to Maureen Brannigan 
Not at all. I’m just not jumping to conclusions.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Maureen Brannigan 
Good question  
 
 
 
 
 
Martin Yan 
problem is, complaints go nowhere but into a void.

nobody finds out what happens about a complaint over an officer and their behaviour.

police deal in secrecy and closed cases.

no transparency to the public for their actions.

unless it's a big case that makes it to print.

where you can't hide.

like dealing with a religious organization.

move people around and give no answers.

 
David Amos
Reply to Martin Yan
No doubt the ex cop was waiting for Samms to pass on and the debt die with him. However now that this issue has become well known I suspect a Judge will get to the bottom of it fairly quickly and perhaps the RCMP will finally have to do something ethical for a change.  
 
 
Maureen Brannigan 
Reply to Martin Yan
 
 
Maureen Brannigan 
Reply to David Amos
This is a huge problem. The police should not be investigating police! Why is this still happening? 
I hope you're right. The top cop goes to great lengths to convince us that bad behaviour is dealt with within the force. Then they decide that this conman cop has done nothing wrong. This is another slap in the face of the RCMP members who actually do their job. Sickening! I'd love to know the opinions of some RCMP members.on this 'tea-leaf' cop.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Maureen Brannigan  
I have been battling the RCMP since 1982  
 
 
Maureen Brannigan 
Reply to David Amos 
Holy! Were you a member of the RCMP? 


David Amos
Reply to Maureen Brannigan  
No they used to enlist me to help them because of my expertise with motorcycles.   
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Maureen Brannigan   
Google the following words to watch a short video

rcmp sussex nb david amos

 
David Amos
Reply to Maureen Brannigan    
Brilliant! 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Matt Smith
Don't lend jerks money.   
 
 
Carly Wattson
Reply to Matt Smith 
Don’t lend friends money if you need it back.
 
 
John Johnston 
Reply to Carly Wattson  
Exactly. Don't ask me to lend you fifty bucks. I'll give it to you if you need it.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to John Johnston 
I concur  
 
 
 
 
mo bennett  
Why would you ever give a cop a hundred k?
 
 
Max Yields 
Reply to mo bennett 
Even, in salary. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Max Yields 
Nobody would unless they were not thinking straight. Hence the old man was conned  
 
 
 
 
 
Darrell George 
Sounds about right for a cop.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Darrell George 
Yup





Paul Carey 
I'm not sure how much faith I have in a "professional responsibilities unit" when it involves interactions with the public. Issues between RCMP members? Sure. But when the public is involved, there's a serious conflict of interest.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Paul Carey 
Check my work





Brad Williams 
"{The RCMP said Lush is no longer employed by the force, having resigned last month before that process concluded.

In an email to CBC News, Lush's lawyer said his client took a medical retirement unrelated to the matter involving Samms." Seems fishy to me.

 
Bill Dixon 
Reply to Brad Williams 
My bet is that he's a scammer in all kinds of ways.  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Brad Williams
You were the first to register the fact that you smell something rotten on the Rock but far from the last 
 
 
 
 
 
Len Evans 
The elderly man worked as a truck driver, he was not some super rich person. Any cop with half a clue would know that no person of normal means gifts you $100,000.00. & if they did, they would take reasonable steps to have it attended to by some legal authority for the protection of the elderly person. This guy has some serious questions to answer. 
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Len Evans
The RCMP should have the answers but they ain't telling us  
 
 
 
 
 
Rick Rubin
I appreciate Mr. Samms's desire to help his neighbour in return, but $100,000? I hope the court sides with Mr. Samms. I doubt he has $100,000 to just blow away like that. And if Mr. Lush had any morals, he'd return the money based on the misunderstanding alone.
 
 
Robert Redson 
Reply to Rick Rubin
The dealings between Mr. Lush and his neighbour was private affair until today. His reputation will be forever questioned by his former and present social contacts and also across his community. He probably didn't think of that when contacted by a reporter. 
 
 
Rese Archer 
Reply to Rick Rubin
How about the legal principle in Canadian law called a "resulting trust" - wouldn't it apply here? It says that a transfer or money or property is deemed to be a loan that returns ('results' in old English) back to the original owner, unless the person receiving it can prove it was intended as a gift. This old but current rule also applies when parents put the title of a home or car in their adult childrens' names (like when they help them buy a house) - when the kids sell or divorce, the parents are entitled to their share of the money back regardless of if their name is on title or not). Same principle here - a transfer of $100k between adult neighbors is deemed a loan that is returnable unless you can prove it was intended in the mind of the giver as a gift. (Pecore v Pecore 2007 SCC) Let the lawyers sort this one out. 
 
 
Robert Harju 
Reply to Rese Archer 
Well stated argument, sir.
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Robert Redson 
There is a lawsuit filed in the PUBLIC Record Correct?  
 
 
 
 
 
William Knot   
"Samms said his wife was upset with him for handing over the money and told her husband that they should have had a written agreement"

Gee, ya think?

 
Jackie Barrett 
Reply to William Knot 
If the memo say "loan" on the cheque add a repayment agree was arranged, Constable Lush still had to pay it back
 
 
David Amos
Reply to William Knot 
Methinks the wife was trying to reason with a hubby who wasn't thinking clearly anymore
 
 
 
 
 
Paul Gardner
If the money was a gift then corruption and tax evasion  
 
 
Bill Dixon 
Reply to Paul Gardner
Gifts aren't taxable. 
 
 
Andrew Hebda 
Reply to Bill Dixon
Are public officials allowed to accept cash gifts?  
 
 
David Amos
 
Reply to Andrew Hebda
Good question   
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Dixon 
Hmmmm  
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Bill Dixon  
Mulroney's tax deal standard practice in 2000, inquiry hears

CBC News · Posted: May 21, 2009 5:40 PM ADT | Last Updated: May 21, 2009

The policy that allowed former prime minister Brian Mulroney to pay taxes on only half of the $225,000 he said he received from German-Canadian businessman Karlheinz Schreiber was a standard practice at the time, a federal inquiry heard Thursday.

But Christiane Sauvé, of the Canada Revenue Agency, told the Oliphant inquiry in Ottawa that the "50 per cent policy" of the voluntary disclosure program has since been changed.

Sauvé said that the voluntary disclosure program allows individuals to pay outstanding taxes and avoid penalties. The benefit to the agency is that it reduces administration costs and allows the agency to get back monies it may not have been able to retrieve.

In order to be eligible, disclosure has to be voluntary, verifiable and the taxes have to be paid, Sauvé said. She added that the taxpayer could not currently be under criminal investigation by the tax office or the RCMP.

 
 
 
 
Jo-Anne P Shaw 
We need Judge Judy on this one!
 
 
David Amos
Reply to Jo-Anne P Shaw 
Surely you jest
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3475

Trending Articles